**2006 Bronze Medal Nominations**

**NOAA CORPORATE OFFICE NOMINATIONS**

**Dan Hytrek Group**

**OGC**

**Nomination #81**

[**Click Here to Go to Nomination**](#Hytrek)

[**(Or see nomination at end of document on page 298)**](#Hytrek)

**Marcia Nolan**

**WFMO**

**Nomination #1**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**1. Full Name of Nominee(s):** Marcia F. Nolan

**Pronunciation of Names**

Mär-shǝ F. Nō-lən

**2. Line Office**: Workforce Management Office

**3. Position title and grade for each nominee:**

Marcia F. Nolan, Human Resources Specialist, GS-0201-12

**4. Past awards (excluding Cash-in-Your Account, Performance and
Special Act Awards)**

Administrator's Award 2005 (Group Award)

NOAA Bronze 2003 and 2000, DOC Bronze 2001

DOC Cutting Back to the Basics 1995

Outstanding Service Award 1993

Resolution Trust Corporation

**5. Nominator's name and Line Office:** Paul J. Kountzman, NWS Client
Services Division Director, Workforce Management Office

**6. Certificate Citation:** (99 characters w/spaces)

"For coordinating payroll and Employee Assistance Program efforts during
Hurricane Katrina"

**7. Program Booklet:** (598 characters w/spaces)

Ms. Nolan is honored for her great efforts in coordinating payroll and
EAP issues during Hurricane Katrina. Ms. Nolan visited National Marine
Fisheries Service, National Environmental Satellite Data Information
Service, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, NOAA Marine and
Aviation Operations, and National Weather Service facilities to assess
the needs of EAP support. Ms. Nolan was also the Workforce Management
Office liaison for resolving payroll difficulties experienced by NOAA
employees. Nolan's contributions benefited NOAA and her fellow employees
during a period of great need.

**JUSTIFICATION:**

**Section 1 -- Definitions**

Not Applicable

**Section 2 -- Award Justification**

***Question 1 -- What was the specific goal, challenge or problem
related to the Department's mission and/or strategic plan?***

Provide employees with Employee Assistance Program (EAP) services and
resolving payroll issues for NOAA employees in the Gulf Coast who were
affected by Hurricane Katrina.

***Question 2 - What was the context in which the nominee addressed the
goal, challenge or problem?***

Ms. Nolan volunteered to go to the Gulf Coast area to arrange for
optional counseling services for NOAA employees impacted by hurricane
Katrina. Ms. Nolan voluntarily exposed herself to conditions which
required bottled water, conditions with no sanitary facilities, exposure
to toxic waste, and other hazardous environmental conditions common to
the area subsequent to hurricane Katrina.

***Question 3 -- What specific actions did the nominee take to address
the goal, challenge or problem?***

After Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005, Ms. Nolan
traveled to Pascagoula, MS; Stennis Space Center, MS; and Slidell, LA to
arrange for optional counseling services. She personally visited
multiple offices and assisted many NOAA employees by arranging for
specific counseling to address their situation.

In addition to coordinating the counseling, she served as the on-site
liaison for the Workforce Management Office's Client Services Divisions
for resolving payroll difficulties experienced by NOAA employees. Ms.
Nolan served as the point of contact for the employees that did not
receive or could not receive their payroll checks. Ms. Nolan contacted
the appropriate Client Services Division and helped troubleshoot
successful resolution of pay issues and in many cases helped to arrange
alternative ways for employees to receive and gain access to their pay

***Question 4 -- What were the results of the actions in either
quantifiable or qualitative terms?***

Ms. Nolan contacted the EAP contractor and confirmed what optional
services the contractor could provide to NOAA employees impacted by
hurricane Katrina. Ms. Nolan negotiated a flat rate hourly fee for all
optional counseling and related services related to Hurricane Katrina.
Ms. Nolan's efforts saved seven thousand dollars for NOAA organizations.
More importantly, her efforts resulted in EAP providing services during
the first weeks subsequent to the landfall of hurricane Katrina to
employees needing counseling and/or other EAP related services.

Ms. Nolan's efforts resulted in obtaining EAP counseling services that
were otherwise not covered under the EAP contract for NOAA employees.
Her efforts helped numerous employees rectify payroll problems so that
they could gain access to their pay to take care of immediate
necessities such as shelter, transportation, safety and working
condition. Ms. Nolan's contributions benefited NOAA and her fellow
employees during a period of great need.

**Section 3 -- Additional Information**

***Question 1 -- How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?
When was the accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?***

It took Ms. Nolan approximately one week to conduct a EAP needs
assessment to determine the requirements necessary to get employees back
to the point where they could perform successfully as team members.
After obtaining management concurrence, she worked with the EAP
contractor to arrange for ongoing counseling for employees. The ongoing
counseling continued for six weeks.

***Question 2 & 3 -- What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the
accomplishment on the bureau and/or Department's mission? & What is the
long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the bureau and/or
Department's mission?***

Ms. Nolan's efforts proved to be successful in getting the affected
employees back to working as integral parts of their teams.

**Mary Leach Group**

**AGO**

**Nomination #2**

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**

The Grants Business Process Reengineering team comprised of line office
and grants office personnel has helped NOAA strengthen its end-to-end
grants process by successfully implementing Line Office and Corporate
Office generated recommendations to improve the grants process.

1.  **Full name of nominee(s):**

(Group) NOAA Grants Business Process Reengineering (BPR) Implementation
Team. Exception requested to have 11 nominees for the group award.

2.  **Major Line of Corporate Office for each nominee:**

See Below

3.  **Position title and grade of each nominee: (Note this team is
    comprised of personnel from the LOs and Grants Office in order to
    understand how each side functions in the operational aspects of
    grants administration)**

Mary Leach (CAO) Transition Management Team Lead GS-15

Rimas Liogys (AGO) BPR Team Lead GS-15

Jerry Erbacher (NMFS) BPR Team Member ZA-04

Toni Parham (NESDIS) BPR Team Member GS-13

Carol Jean Pendleton (GMD) BPR Team Member GS-12

Harry Mears (NMFS) BPR Team Member GS-15

Maria Uitteroeve (NMFS) BPR Team Member GS-12

Dwight Reynolds (NOS) BPR Team Member GS-12

Daniel Namur (GMD) BPR Team Member GS-09

Shelby Mendez (PPI) BPR Team Member ZA-03

Alan Conway (GMD) BPR Team Member GS-13

4.  **Past awards**

Rimas Liogys -- Bronze Medal (1995)

5.  **Nominator's name and major Line or Corporate Office**

Helen Hurcombe / Rimas Liogys

Acquisition and Grants Office

**Certificate Citation**

For supporting the President's Management Agenda (PMA) to achieve
organizational excellence and support NOAA's mission to strengthen its
Financial and Administrative services through an integrated team of line
office and grants office personnel.

6.  **Justification**

**A. What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The Grants BPR team was faced with integrating a team comprised of
program office and grants office personnel to achieve the goal of
developing recommendations and successfully implementing them to improve
the end-to-end grants process. The work performed is linked to NOAA's
strategic goals to **Provide Critical Support for NOAA's Mission**. This
goal acknowledges the importance of efficient and effective financial
and administrative processes and their role in contributing to the
accomplishment of NOAA's mission goals.

**B. What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?**

This highly successful integrated team required its members to dedicate
80 - 100% of their time over a six to 18 month period (with most
continuing to perform their regular duties). The team established a
4-workstream approach to develop and ensure successful implementation of
the BPR recommendations:

-   [Project Mgmt]{.underline}: Establishes the overall timeframe and
    mgmt. of the recommendation and implementation process

-   [Process Transformation]{.underline}: Addresses the approach and
    associated activities to develop and implement recommendations

-   [Performance Mgmt]{.underline}: Addresses implementation of new
    performance metrics for the end-to-end Grants process

-   [Change Mgmt. and Communication]{.underline}: Intended to cultivate
    awareness, understanding, and acceptance of the effort and its
    resulting changes

C.  **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

The team developed 19 NOAA-wide recommendations and then converted them
to policies and procedures to ensure an efficient and effective grant
process. For example:

-   Enhance grants planning by developing a NOAA-wide tool that
    maintains both budget and grant-related information

-   Develop a NOAA-wide grants certification program

-   Update the NOAA Grants website with comprehensive, customer-focused,
    and secure information

**D. What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

-   Identified cost (17%) and cycle time (19%) reductions to process a
    grant

-   Developed a grants planning tool to enable yearly LO-specific and
    NOAA-wide grant plans. Planning tool requires interaction between LO
    budget, program, and GMD personnel, which was never done before

-   Improved grants workload distribution and processing capacity,
    resulting in 113% more grants in the first 8 months of FY06 than in
    FY05

-   Improved budgetary/grants planning which resulted in a 118% increase
    in grants awarded in the first quarter of FY06

-   Set goal to award grants 30-days prior to their start date, leading
    to increased customer satisfaction

-   Developed a NOAA-wide grants certification program

**Additional Information**

**1. How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The Grants BPR Implementation began in January 2006 and is expected to
be completed by September 2006

**2. What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The BPR implementation has had an immediate impact by standardizing the
grants process for LO and Corporate personnel. Although each
recommendation has short term impacts, the following are the specific
impacts of one of the BPR recommendations "Enhance Grants Fiscal Year
Planning":

-   Spread LO and GMD workload, thereby increasing overall quality and
    timeliness of grant processing

-   Reduce variance reporting because allotments, which are based on
    award start dates, will be obligated in the period for which they
    were planned

**3. What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

In the long-term the implementation of the BPR recommendations will
enable NOAA to strengthen services provided to customers and achieve
lasting tangible time and cost savings. In addition, this effort will
also institutionalize BPR knowledge for application in other areas at
NOAA.

**4. Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The BPR effort has made an impact both DOC-wide and at other
grant-making agencies. The NOAA-wide certification program implemented
by the Team was adopted by DOC and is intended to become a DOC-wide
certification program for personnel involved in the grants process.
Additionally, NOAA has received inquires about the effort from other
peer agencies, EPA recently contacted NOAA, "I understand that NOAA has
done an outstanding analysis of how to reengineer its grants business
process!  Could we get an electronic copy of it?  The analysis will be
very helpful to us as we embark on an initiative to improve the
efficiency of EPA\'s grant process." 

**5. Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

N/A

**6. Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative support?
If so, how?**

The BPR effort has increased the focus on customer satisfaction and
improved communication and collaboration between LO and CO personnel.
This was achieved by the introduction of a Grants Operating Model that
focuses on grant services and operating enablers for the grants process.
Additionally, this effort has resulted in the strengthening of
interaction and co-dependency among Grants Management Advisory Committee
members.

**Ezekiel Dennison Group**

**CAO**

**Nomination #3**

**Name: NOAA Personal Property Management Team** (see attached list)

+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| **Nominee Name**  | **Title and      | **Office**    | **Past        |
|                   | Grade**          |               | Awards**      |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Ezekiel Dennison  | Director,        | OCAO/RPFLO/   |               |
| Jr.               | Logistics        |               |               |
|                   | Division -- GS   | LD            |               |
|                   | 15               |               |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Brian Mason       | Supply Mgt       | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999;  |
|                   | Specialist -- GS |               | Federal       |
|                   | 13               | LD/PPMB       | Property      |
|                   |                  |               | Person of the |
|                   |                  |               | Year, 2003    |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Elizabeth         | Personal         | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999   |
| Valenzona         | Property Mgt     |               |               |
|                   | Specialist -- GS | L             |               |
|                   | 12               | D/BMB-Seattle |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Kim Hutchinson    | Personal         | OCAO/RPFLO/   |               |
|                   | Property Mgt     |               |               |
|                   | Specialist -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 7                |               |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Rudy Nunez        | Inventory Mgt    | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999   |
|                   | Specialist -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 12               | L             |               |
|                   |                  | D/BMB-Boulder |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Sheila Hensley    | Supply           | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999   |
|                   | Technician -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 7                | L             |               |
|                   |                  | D/BMB-Boulder |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Gilly Elsea       | Personal         | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999   |
|                   | Property Mgt     |               |               |
|                   | Specialist -- GS | LD/BMB-Kansas |               |
|                   | 12               | City          |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Robin MacMillan   | Inventory Mgt    | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999   |
|                   | Specialist -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 7                | L             |               |
|                   |                  | D/BMB-Norfolk |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Holly Turri       | Supply           | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999   |
|                   | Technician -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 7                | LD/PPMB       |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Barbara Carson    | Personal         | OCAO/RPFLO/   |               |
|                   | Property Account |               |               |
|                   | Manager -- GS 11 | LD/WMB        |               |
|                   |                  | -NCR-Detailed |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Melissa Nelson    | Personal         | OCAO/RPFLO/   |               |
|                   | Property Account |               |               |
|                   | Manager -- GS 11 | LD/WMB        |               |
|                   |                  | -NCR-Detailed |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Thomas Deckard    | Property Mgt     | OCAO/RPFLO/   |               |
|                   | Specialist -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 13               | LD/PPMB       |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Larry Oates       | Inventory Mgt    | OCAO/RPFLO/   |               |
|                   | Specialist -- GS |               |               |
|                   | 12               | LD/PPMB       |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Lyn Joynes        | Property         | OCAO/RPFLO/   | Bronze 1999;  |
|                   | Disposal         |               | Bronze 2005   |
|                   | Specialist -- GS | LD/PPMB       |               |
|                   | 9                |               |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+

**Nominator and Office:** William F. Broglie

NOAA Office of the Chief Administrative Officer

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

This enhanced personal property system reduced unreconciled payments for
FY 03, 04 and 05 to the lowest level NOAA's history; strengthened
oversight and fulfilled financial audit requirements.

**[I. Certificate Text]{.underline}:**

For exemplary contributions in developing and implementing a NOAA-wide
Personal Property accountability system and program.

**[II. Program Booklet Test: not required for Bronze
nominations]{.underline}**

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 -- Definitions/Acronyms]{.underline}**

AGO -- Acquisitions and Grants Office

UPR -- Unreconciled Payments Report

LD -- Logistics Division

OCAO -- Office of the Chief Administrative Officer

PC -- Property Custodian

PM -- Property Manager

PPMB -- Personal Property Management Branch

RPFLO -- Real Property, Facilities, and Logistics Office

WMB-NCR-Warehouse Management Branch-National Capital Region

Sunflower -- Automated framework to manage all of NOAA's Personal
Property assets

CBS -- Commerce Business System

FIMA -- Financial Information Management Accounting

BMB -- Buildings Management Branch

[**Section 2 - Award Justification**]{.underline}

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

> In the beginning of FY2005, NOAA had paid for \$25,635,139.12 worth of
> property that had not been identified nor recorded in the personal
> property tracking system (Sunflower). Some payments dated back to
> FY2003. As a result, the Department's Financial Statement was
> understated, and the Department was vulnerable to not passing a
> financial audit.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> Of the 120,000 accountable pieces of personal property tracked by the
> Department, NOAA has 106,000. The recording of the reconciliation
> between the payments and the Sunflower records had to be done
> manually. The auditors found that NOAA had a problem with timely
> reporting of property acquisitions.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> An automated procedure was created to reconcile Sunflower data with
> finance payment data reducing the overall UPR level and enabling NOAA
> to fulfill financial audit requirements.
>
> E-training was mandated for Line and Staff Office Property Custodians
> (PC) and Property Managers (PM) to ensure successful audits. 90+% of
> NOAA's 120 Property Accountable Officers and 88% of NOAA's 656 PCs
> were formally trained; monthly meetings were implemented between the
> PPMB staff , Line/Staff Offices PMs and the Chief Finance Office to
> resolve differences between Sunflower and CBS; bi-weekly conference
> calls with all Field Office managers/Regional PMs and weekly "huddles"
> were conducted with PPMB to address/resolve critical issues.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

> The UPR was reduced to lowest level in NOAA's history (\$25,635,139.12
> on 10/1/04 to \$4,830,577.83 on 9/29/05). Part of this \$20.8 million
> dollar reduction included \$2,757,464.88 of payments recorded in the
> old FIMA financial system which was difficult to reconcile. The
> \$393,000 FY03 UPR and the \$2,608,000 FY04 UPR were eliminated. All
> Line and Staff Offices appointed PMs and Alternate PMs strengthening
> NOAA's Personal Property program nationwide, and ensuring that timely,
> complete and accurate reporting of property acquisitions was
> understood to be important at the highest levels of the organization.

**[Section 3-Award Justification-Additional Information]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?  When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

> The establishment of the enhanced personal property accountability
> system and UPR reduction occurred primarily between Fiscal Year 2003
> through 2006.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or department's mission? **

> Auditors have noted the team's progress in enhancing personal property
> accountability at NOAA and the reduced UPR. There are now timely
> reconciliations of NOAA purchases with outstanding payments, which
> should continue into the foreseeable future.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

> Oversight of NOAA's personal property and overall asset accountability
> has been strengthened. The UPR has been significantly reduced to a
> reasonable level and NOAA now has the assurance of continued enhanced
> oversight with the newly trained/qualified property managers. NOAA's
> compliance efforts with financial reconciliation should no longer
> result in audit findings nor impact the Department's financial audit.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies?  If so, how?**

> Yes. The Department's audited financial statement now more accurately
> reflects the value of assets on hand since NOAA has approximately
> 88.7% of the entire Dept. of Commerce personal property asset value.
> Other Federal Agencies continue to inquire citing NOAA's drastic
> improvement as a best practice with plenty of lessons learned.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation?  If so, how?**

> **N/A**

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support?  If so, how?**

> There is now more timely reconciliation of all financial records with
> property acquisitions, which has improved both Line/Staff Office
> customer and administrative support for all NOAA missions.

**Roy Eckert Group**

**CAO**

**Nomination #4**

**Name: Real Property Integrated Facility Inspection Program Team (**see
attached list)

+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| **Nominee Name**  | **Title and      | **Office**    | **Past        |
|                   | Grade**          |               | Awards**      |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Roy Eckert        | Supervisory      | CAO/RPMD      | Bronze Award  |
|                   | Realty Officer - |               | 1993          |
|                   | GS 15            |               |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Gina Ziegenbein   | Property         | CAO/RPMD      | Bronze Award  |
|                   | Management       |               |               |
|                   | Officer GS-14    |               | 1991          |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+
| Gene Rodgers      | Management       | CAO/RPMD      |               |
|                   | Analyst- GS-13   |               |               |
+-------------------+------------------+---------------+---------------+

**Nominator and Office:** William F. Broglie

NOAA Chief Administrative Officer

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The development of a web-based Integrated Facility Inspection Program
(IFIP) has promoted life-cycle management of NOAA's real property
assets, and enables the Agency to satisfy E.O.13327; *Federal Real
Property Asset Management*.

**[I. Certificate Text;]{.underline}**

For outstanding leadership in developing and implementing NOAA's
Integrated Facility Inspection Program.

**[II. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions]{.underline}**

CAO -- Chief Administrative Officer

RPFLO -- Real Property Facilities and Logistics Office

RPMD -- Real Property Management Division

**[Section 2 - Award Justification]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

NOAA's broad mission results in its facility portfolio being both
architecturally diverse and geographically dispersed. NOAA owns more
than 440 facilities and leases another 400 facilities that support
essential NOAA operations and programs. Because of the diversity of
NOAA's real estate portfolio, the challenge was to develop a web based
questionnaire that could assess building deficiencies at a broad array
of sites, and also provide consistent costing data to depict required
investments.

In addition, the supplemental FY 2008 budget guidance from DOC's Office
of Budget stated "Major real estate projects will **[not]{.underline}**
be considered unless the bureau has a long-term facilities plan that is
current and consistent with the bureau's request." The IFIP data has
been instrumental in meeting the needs of this request.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Because this type of facility condition analysis had not been completed
by any other Bureau within the Department of Commerce moreover at other
Federal agencies, the team was confronted with the challenge of having
to meet with internal clients to understand the breath and complexity of
the real property holdings, assess market software alternatives to meet
the subtleties of NOAA's portfolio, and then develop a strategic vision
as to how the information regarding each buildings condition could be
collected and evaluated.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Team members developed key business requirements and system
specifications based on NOAA-wide user requirements, initiated and
administered the contract acquisition and award process, established and
maintained a NOAA users-group to refine the system and provide user
training, pilot-tested and ultimately deployed NOAA\'s first ever
Integrated Facility Inspection Program. This accomplishment resulted in
the establishment of a robust facility condition assessment process
enabling the Department of Commerce to successfully report data and meet
the requirements of Executive Order 13327.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

The first cycle of the IFIP survey resulted in the identification of
approximately \$89 million dollars worth of deficiencies in NOAA owned
and occupied buildings, and another \$9.6 million dollars of
deficiencies in NOAA leased and GSA assigned and occupied buildings.

**[Section 3-Award Justification-Additional Information]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment complete/implemented/deployed?**

The team assembled a Statement of Work, reviewed proposals and made a
contract award in Fiscal Year 04. During FY 05, the vendor's software
was adjusted to meets the needs of NOAA, and a questionnaire tool was
finalized. Cost algorithms were also reviewed to ensure accuracy. In
July, 2005 the first survey was deployed, and surveys were completed by
October, 2005. Beginning in November, 2005, survey data was tabulated,
evaluated and presented to internal and external customers.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or department's mission?**

Data from the first survey cycle has been used to develop short run
investment strategies, and has assisted in the development of some
campus and geographically based housing solutions**.** In addition, data
from the survey process has served as the foundation of NOAA's Facility
Modernization Plan submitted by NOAA senior management to the
Department.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The work completed on this project will position NOAA for years to come
in being able to cyclically assess the conditions of its buildings, and
maintain current data on building deficiencies at those sites.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Data from the survey has been used by the DOC Office of Real Estate in
meeting the reporting requirements of Executive Order 13327. Also,
numerous federal agencies have contacted NOAA for a demonstration of the
software, with interest in adapting the product for their needs.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how? N/A**

The web based survey tool that was developed enabled building occupants
at remote locations to access a survey tool, complete the question set,
send the answers to a centralized data base, which then priced
deficiencies based upon their answers. The centralized data base
aggregated the data to depict conditions for the entire NOAA portfolio.
The use of automation in collecting the data was both innovative and
unprecedented.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Development and execution of this system enabled the Chief
Administrative Officer's Office to demonstrate leadership in management
and accountability of NOAA's real property portfolio, and provided key
data to the NOAA Line Offices which heretofore had been unavailable.
Client feedback to the CAO on this system and its output has been most
positive.

**Ann Murphy Group**

**CAO**

**Nomination #5**

**Name: NOAA Deemed Export Implementation Team** (see attached list)

+----------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+
| Ann Murphy     | Program        | CAO/DEEMED     | NOAA GENERAL     |
|                | Analyst        | EXPORT         | COUNSEL'S AWARD  |
|                |                |                | 2005             |
|                | GS 15          |                |                  |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+
| Melanie Ann    | Program        | CAO/DEEMED     | NOAA GENERAL     |
| Caesar         | Analyst        | EXPORT         | COUNSEL'S AWARD  |
|                |                |                | 2005             |
|                | GS 12          |                |                  |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+
| Scott Jeffrey  | Assistant      | CAO/DEEMED     | NOAA GENERAL     |
| Jordan         | General        | EXPORT         | COUNSEL'S AWARD  |
|                | Counsel GS 15  |                | 2005             |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+
| Hugh Christian | At             | CAO/DEEMED     | NOAA GENERAL     |
| Schratwieser   | torney-Advisor | EXPORT         | COUNSEL'S AWARD  |
|                |                |                | 2005             |
|                | GS-14          |                |                  |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+------------------+

**Nominator and Office:** William F. Broglie

NOAA Chief Administrative Officer

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The nominees developed and implemented a deemed export compliance
program to prevent the release of controlled technology to foreign
nationals while balancing NOAA's cross-cutting mission for international
collaboration successfully closing all open action items from OIG audit
report concerning NOAA's compliance with Export Administration
Regulations (EAR).

**[I. Certificate Text (maximum characters -]{.underline}** For
developing and implementing NOAA's deemed export compliance program,
designed to prevent the unauthorized release of controlled technology to
foreign nationals.

**[II. Program Booklet Text: not required for Bronze
nominations]{.underline}**

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1- Definitions/Acronyms]{.underline}**

**AGM**- Annual Guidance Memorandum of NOAA's Strategic Plan

**BIS**- Bureau of Industry and Security

**CCL**- Commerce Control List

**CO**-Corporate Office

**DOC-** Department of Commerce

**EAR**- Export Administration Regulations

**LO**-Line Office

**NAO --** NOAA Administrative Order

**OIG** -- Office of the Inspector General

**OAM**- Office of Acquisition Management

**OSY** -- Office of Security

**[Deemed Export]{.underline}** - Any release of technology or source
code subject to the EAR to a foreign national within the United States.
Such a release is deemed to be an export to

the home country or countries of the foreign national. This deemed
export rule does not apply to persons lawfully admitted for permanent
residence in the United States or to persons who are protected
individuals under the Immigration and Naturalization Act (8 U.S.C.
1324b(a)(3)).

**[Controlled technology]{.underline}** - Items and technology required
for the development, production, or use of items on the CCL and that are
subject to EAR controls. Controlled technology includes dual use items
that have both commercial and military or proliferation applications.
Whether a deemed export license is required in any particular situation
is determined by the home country designation of the foreign national
and the type of access that foreign national has/may need to the
technology.

**[Priority One Sites]{.underline}**- Facilities hosting foreign
nationals and National Critical Infrastructure sites

**[Section 2- Award Justification]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

> The DOC OIG March 2004 Report to Congress cited export control
> compliance as one of the "Top 10 Management Challenges" and noted that
> "NOAA lacks an overall deemed export control policy to effectively
> monitor foreign national access to controlled technology." The
> nominees developed and implemented a deemed export compliance program
> which supports: 1) AGM FY08-12 "Coordinated NOAA's Homeland
> Security-Related Plans, Programs, and Policies to enhance NOAA-Wide
> program response, risk management\..." and 2) the FY04-09 DOC
> Strategic Plan 1.2, "Prevent illegal exports and identify violators of
> export prohibitions..."

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> The team established a new program to comply with a complex regulatory
> regime. There were no existing compliance models to draw from for an
> organization of NOAA's size and complexity, and NOAA lacked internal
> deemed export procedures and expertise. There was significant media
> attention on deemed exports, as well as internal concern given the
> emphasis NOAA places on international exchanges in science and
> technology.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

    -   Worked with a steering committee to administer the deemed
        exports program;

    -   Promulgated NAO 207-12, *Technology Controls and Foreign
        National Access* (5-11-06) establishing NOAA policies and
        procedures governing export controls;

    -   Coordinated completion of an inventory of 1) foreign nationals
        working at NOAA and 2) controlled technology at Priority One
        sites;

    -   Administered a training and outreach program for NOAA employees
        to ensure awareness of regulations governing controlled
        technology;

    -   Developed a contract/grants clause to ensure those receiving
        NOAA funds recognize their obligations under the EAR;

    -   Issued (6-20-06) guidance for researchers on their
        responsibilities concerning controlled technology;

    -   Established a certification process to ensure ongoing program
        compliance.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

> The team swiftly addressed the risk of export control non-compliance
> by creating a system to track access by foreign nationals to
> controlled technology. Facing this urgency, the team assisted BIS in
> training over 175 NOAA staff nationwide enabling over 250 facilities
> to complete controlled technology inventories and prepare access
> control plans. The team's efforts ensured compliance with deemed
> export regulations. OIG acknowledged the increased cooperation within
> NOAA and with BIS and OSY.

**[Section 3-Award Justification-Additional Information]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?  When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

> The establishment of the deemed export compliance program occurred
> primarily between June 2005 and June 2006. While the program will be
> ongoing, all actions identified in the original OIG assessment of NOAA
> were completed in June 2006.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or department's mission? **

> OIG noted the team's progress in enhancing awareness at NOAA and
> reducing the risk of deemed export violations. The team developed a
> certification process and roles and responsibilities to establish
> clear lines of accountability. The program provides a framework for
> NOAA to continue its international partnerships while complying with
> the EAR, thus reducing the risk of deemed export violations.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

> Deemed export controls serve national security, foreign policy, and
> nonproliferation interests of the U.S. by preventing the unauthorized
> transfer of controlled dual use technology. Long term, NOAA's
> compliance program supports national security efforts and will help
> prevent the unlicensed transfer of controlled technology to foreign
> nationals without burdening NOAA's important missions. OIG has
> encouraged NOAA to move forward with its program.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies?  If so, how?**

> Yes. The nominees partnered with BIS, OSY, and OAM to develop
> procedures to comply with the EAR and with OSY policies for foreign
> national access. These relationships enhanced NOAA's understanding of
> the regulations and BIS's ability to assist federal agencies with the
> EAR. BIS embraced the opportunity to assist a large "sister agency"
> with numerous cooperative relationships with universities and research
> institutions.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation?  If so, how? N/A**

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support?  If so, how?**

> Yes. What would have been difficult to accomplish in a single LO was
> accomplished across NOAA through a concerted effort led by the team.
> The team provided superior customer service and embodied many NOAA
> Core Values including *People, Integrity, Excellence, Teamwork, and
> Service.* The team drafted numerous documents and provided extensive
> consultation and guidance. They coordinated the efforts of OIG, BIS,
> and NOAA, established strong working relationships with DOC, and
> harnessed NOAA expertise to strengthen the compliance program. This
> corporate approach created a dynamic and evolving program that will
> assist NOAA to comply with the regulations while pursuing
> international exchanges. The approach provided flexibility to develop
> procedures based on unique LO organization structures and ensured that
> a "one NOAA" complied with national security regulations.

**CAPT John Humphrey Group**

**CIO**

**Nomination #6**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**Nominees:**

Homeland Security Program Office (HSPO)

CAPT John Humphrey, Executive Officer, NMAO -- Captain NOAA Corps

David Meiselman, Management Analyst GS-14

LCDR Keith W. Roberts, Lieutenant Commander NOAA Corps

Jean M. Smith, Management Analyst GS-14

Heather Gilbert, Management Analyst GS-12

NESDIS

Jane D'Aguanno, Technical Assistant ZP 4

1993 Administrator's Award, 1999 Bronze Award, 2000 Bronze Award, 2005
Administrator's Award

Roberta A. McQuilkin, Program Specialist ZA III

2003 Administrator's Award

NOS

Peter N. Gibson, Management Analyst GS-14

2001 Bronze Medal

Amy E. Holman, Program Analyst GS-13

2004 Administrator's Award

Jason Rolfe, Physical Scientist GS-12

U.S. Coast Guard Award for M/V ATHOS spill in Delaware River

LT Demian A. Bailey, LT---Assistant Scientific Support Coordinator

Assoc. of Commissioned Officer's Junior Office of the Year (2005)

Edwin L. Martin, Supervisory Cartographer GS-14

Kim L. Owens, General Physical Scientist GS-12

Robb K. Wright, Geographer GS-12

NWS

Mark S. Paese, Director Operations Division ES-801-00

1999 Bronze Medal, 2005 Administrator's Award

Albert H. Mongeon, Program Analyst GS-13

James J. Valdez, Management Analyst GS-15

Dennis A. Miller, Hydrologist GS-13

Douglas C. Young, Meteorologist GS-14

Kevin P. Lynott, Hydrologist GS-14

Paul M. Stokols, Meteorologist GS-14

Leslie O. Taylor, Supervisory Management & Program Analyst GS-14

Richard Okulski, Meteorologist GS-13

Robert J. McLeod, Supervisory Meteorologist GS-15

NMAO

LCDR Harris B. Halverson, Lieutenant Commander NOAA Corps

LT Nicole Manning, Lieutenant NOAA Corps

CDR Michele G. Bullock, Commander NOAA Corps

Timothy D. Salisbury, Ensign NOAA Corps

LCDR Eric W. Berkowitz, Lieutenant Commander NOAA Corps

William R. Cunningham, Physical Scientist GS-14

James William O'Clock, Physical Scientist GS-13

Michael Henderson, NOAA Regional Coordinator GS-14

NMFS

Mark G. Spurrier, Deputy Director, Office of Law Enforcement (OLE),
GS-15

Everett W. Baxter, Special Agent/National Program Manager for Homeland
Security Activities, OLE, GS-13

Stuart Edward Cory, Special Agent/National Program Manager for Protected
Resources and International Affairs, OLE, GS-13

OAR

CDR Wade J. Blake, Executive Officer/Commander

1990 Bronze Award

Roger V. Pierce, Senior Meteorologist ZP-IV-3

Ann Helen Georgilas, Program Analyst ZA IV

CAO

John M. Beeman, Special Technical Assistant, GS-15

Dana J. Shields, Special Technical Assistant, GS-15

WFMO

Darla Callaghan, Director, UNSEC Client Services Division GS-15

AGO

Jeanie M. Jennings, Supervisory Contract Specialist GS-15

**Certificate Text:**

> For extraordinary management excellence and teamwork in providing
> unified emergency response and incident management for Hurricanes
> Katrina and Rita.

## Justification

1.  **Definitions**

> [DOC EOC]{.underline}: Department of Commerce Emergency Operations
> Center.
>
> [Incident Coordination Center:]{.underline} (1) Emergency operations
> center located in SSMC I, 8^th^ floor; and (2) staffed by cadre of
> specially trained personnel bringing working knowledge of the National
> Response Plan, scientific and management issues, NOAA and Line Office
> Continuity of Operation (COOP) and contingency planning and NOAA
> organizational structures implementing program activities.
>
> [Homeland Security Program Office:]{.underline} NOAA activity tasked
> with establishing and maintaining the ICC and coordination of all
> homeland-security related policies, plans and programs.
>
> [Homeland Security Senior Management Team]{.underline}: A cadre of
> specially trained, Assistant Administrator- or Staff Office
> Director-appointed Line and Staff Office representatives serving as an
> executive steering group for HSPO. Members serve on ICC and COOP teams
> and working groups.
>
> [National Incident Management System (NIMS).]{.underline} National
> system mandated by Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 to
> facilitate interaction of engaged activities. Includes the Incident
> Command System (ICS) which establishes predefines roles and
> responsibilities for incident management.
>
> [NOAA HSOC Desk]{.underline}: NOAA presence in Homeland Security
> Operations Center (HSOC). Provides input to scheduled HSOC briefings
> and subject briefings including SECDHS. NOAA interface to other HSOC
> federal, state, and local support desks for information during all
> natural and man-made incidents for national level coordination.
> Supports the DHS Interagency Incident Management Group.

2.  **Award Justification**

> **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
> Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**
>
> To achieve organizational and management excellence in incident
> management. The nation depends on NOAA to (1) deliver scientific
> expertise, environmental information and situational awareness on
> operations supporting mission essential functions at all times; (2)
> integrate our activities into national planning, and (3) orchestrate
> all engaged activities, whether provided from sources impacted and
> operating under contingency plans; deployed assets on-site; supporting
> national, state or local incident management structures; or operating
> from normal duty stations.

What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?

> Between August 24 through October 3, 2005, NOAA faced Hurricanes
> Katrina, Rita and Wilma. Hurricane Katrina alone was among the
> deadliest and, in terms of economic loss, the most destructive natural
> disasters ever to strike the United States. Never before has all of
> NOAA been so widely affected by such a significant event. During these
> hurricanes, 719 NOAA employees were directly impacted (homes damaged
> or destroyed, vehicles damaged, etc.).

What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?

Four days before landfall, on Friday, August 26, 2005, NOAA activated
the Incident Coordination Center (ICC) for daily coordination and
overall incident management. The ICC served as the implementing arm of
NOAA leadership during activation. It achieved National-level
inter-agency coordination, coordinated NOAA activities, established
priorities, and supported deployed and impacted people and assets. The
ICC established and maintained the information stream vital to the
Situational Awareness and Common Operating Picture, guiding operations
at all levels of incident management. The ICC satisfied 100+ tracked
actions and issued 13 recurring reports: daily ICC SITREPS to Office of
Under Secretary, DOC EOC, DHS, and USNORTHCOM and current information on
NOAA's people, mission delivery, and impacted infrastructure.

What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?

The ICC realized "One NOAA" -- all NOAA activities working together for
a national need. NOAA's people were found, accounted for and helped.
NOAA's capabilities were effectively delivered where and when needed.
NOAA's Office of the Under Secretary was informed and appropriately
engaged. NOAA's partners were supported.

# **Additional Information**

How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?

Preparation began October 2001. HSPO leads NOAA efforts in national
exercises, planning, training, and preparedness activities. The ICC
operational construct, first realized at NOAA's Alternate Site C in
Forward Challenge 04, is executed by NOAA's Homeland Security Senior
Management Team (HS SMT) and Line and Staff Office representatives who
staff the ICC. The HS SMT also provides 24/7 monitoring as NOAA Watch
Officer.

What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

NOAA's effectiveness earned engagement in national planning. Corporate
NOAA and DOC saw firsthand the benefits of Continuity of Operations
Plans (COOPs) and incident management performed through a single source
to ensure coordinated delivery of NOAA essential functions, supporting
activities and capabilities.

What is the short-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

The nation has seen what NOAA can do to detect and warn, respond and
recover, and conduct long-term restoration. Partners see current and
future rewards of partnering with NOAA's scientific expertise,
environmental products and observing infrastructure.

Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other Federal
agencies? If so, how?

DHS and USNORTHCOM witnessed NOAA's efforts in Katrina and Rita.
Briefings provided by the NOAA Desk included DHS Secretary and White
House.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?

The ICC set up web-based and telephone-based infrastructures for NOAA's
most important asset, our people, to report their condition and
availability. ICC operations were supported by a separate server. A
phone system now forwards calls from the ICC to the NOAA Watch Officer.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?

The 2005 hurricane season was the first real test of the ICC being
physically stood up and demonstrated beyond a doubt the benefits of
unity of effort and a single information stream. All of NOAA now has a
greater degree of confidence in the ICC's ability to engage and respond
to any future disasters. Lessons learned during the hurricane season are
being incorporated into an ICC Standard Operating Plan. Thirty-six
iridium satellite phones were ordered and shipped to NOAA field sites in
the Gulf area in hopes of alleviating future communication problems. All
NOAA identification badges are now being printed with NOAA's emergency
toll-free number and homeland security web address. Stickers with this
information have been distributed to all employees to affix to their
badges until they receive new ones. National partners are now more aware
of the response capabilities NOAA has to offer.

**David Meiselman Group**

**CIO**

**Nomination #7**

**Nominees: NOAA's COOP Working Group**

Homeland Security Program Office (HSPO):

**David Meiselman**, Management Analyst GS-14

**Jean Smith**, Management Analyst GS-14

NESDIS: **Jane D'Aguanno**, Technical Assistant ZP 4

1993 Administrator's Award, 1999 Bronze Award, 2000 Bronze Award, 2005
Administrator's Award

**David Urbanski**, Chief, NCDC Support Services Division, ZP-V.

NOS: **Peter N. Gibson**, Management Analyst GS-14

2001 Bronze Medal

NWS: **Mark S. Paese**, Director Operations Division ES-801-00

1999 Bronze Medal, 2005 Administrator's Award

**Albert H. Mongeon**, Program Analyst GS-13

NMFS: **Mark G. Spurrier**, Dep. Dir., Office of Law Enforcement (OLE),
GS-15

**Everett W. Baxter**, Special Agent/National Program Manager for
Homeland Security Activities, OLE GS-13

OAR: **CDR Wade J. Blake**, Executive Officer/Commander

1990 Bronze Award

CAO: **Ezekiel Dennison**, Director, Logistics Division GS-15

**Mark Napoli**, Deputy Director, Logistics Division GS-15

**James Griffith**, Management Analyst GS-11

WFMO: **Darla Callaghan**, Director, UNSEC Client Services Division
GS-15

CIO: **Donald Holtzer**, Mgr, Messaging Operations Center, IT Spec.
GS-15

1995 and 2001 Bronze Awards, October 2003 Employee of the Month

**Nominator:** CDR Phil Kenul, Program Manager, Homeland Security

NOAA OCIO

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**

> This accomplishment signifies the dedication and commitment of the
> nominees toward substantially improving NOAA's COOP readiness through
> their dynamic test, training and exercise program in FY2006.

**Certificate Text:**

For design and execution of a Continuity of Operations exercise which
improved NOAA's ability to continue essential functions under all
circumstances.

## Justification

3.  **Definitions/Acronyms**

> [CONOPS]{.underline}: Concept of Operations
>
> [Continuity of Operations (COOP)]{.underline}: The activities of
> individual departments and agencies and their sub-components to ensure
> that their essential functions are performed. This includes plans and
> procedures that delineate essential functions; specify succession to
> office and the emergency delegation of authority; provide for the
> safekeeping of vital records and databases; identify alternate
> operating facilities; provide for interoperable communications; and
> validate the capability through tests, training, and exercises.
>
> [COOP Working Group (CWG)]{.underline}: A subset of the Homeland
> Security Senior Management Team (see below) convening as needed for
> exercises or policy issues.
>
> [COOP SOP]{.underline}: Continuity of Operations Standard Operating
> Procedures
>
> [DHS/FEMA]{.underline}: Department of Homeland Security/Federal
> Emergency Management Agency
>
> [Homeland Security Program Office (HSPO):]{.underline} NOAA activity
> tasked with establishing and maintaining the ICC and coordination of
> all homeland-security related policies, plans and programs.
>
> [Homeland Security Senior Management Team]{.underline}: A cadre of
> specially trained, Assistant Administrator- or Staff Office
> Director-appointed Line and Staff Office representatives serving as an
> executive steering group for HSPO. Members serve on ICC and COOP teams
> and working groups.
>
> [Incident Coordination Center (ICC):]{.underline} Emergency operations
> center located in SSMC I, 8^th^ floor; and staffed by cadre of
> specially trained personnel bringing working knowledge of the National
> Response Plan, scientific and management issues, NOAA and Line Office
> Continuity of Operation (COOP) and contingency planning and NOAA
> organizational structures implementing program activities. Members of
> the ICC deploy with COOP team to alternate sites if needed.
>
> [ICC SOP]{.underline}: Incident Coordination Center Standard Operating
> Procedures
>
> [Incident Command System (ICS)]{.underline}: An on-scene structure of
> management-level positions suitable for managing any incident.
>
> [NCDC]{.underline}: National Climatic Data Center, organizationally
> located under NOAA's National Environmental Satellite, Data and
> Information Service. NCDC facility is located in Asheville, NC.

4.  **Award Justification**

> **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
> Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**
>
> The goal was to ensure continuity of NOAA's essential functions under
> all circumstances. In order to achieve this, NOAA must 1) have a
> viable COOP Plan; 2) trained employees; and 3) COOP capabilities that
> can be performed from an alternate location.

What was the context in which the nominees addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?

> Between June 20 and June 22, 2006, NOAA participated in a Federal
> Executive Branch interagency full-scale exercise, Forward Challenge
> 2006 (FC06), to test its readiness and capabilities to execute COOP.
> DHS/FEMA conducted the exercise and all Departments and Agencies
> participated. In conjunction with FC06, NOAA developed an internal
> exercise scenario to test its ability to respond and recover from a
> terrorist attack on its headquarters facilities.

What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?

The nominees were part of a COOP Working Group and were responsible for
the exercise design, planning, and development of the NOAA drill. They
conducted several preparation meetings leading up to the exercise. They
took lessons learned from previous COOP exercises and incorporated them
into the NOAA COOP Plan and ICC SOP. They provided several training
sessions in incident management and COOP activation procedures for
members of the COOP team, ICC, and NCDC staff. They designed and
conducted a pre-drill at the alternate site in April 2006 to ensure
everything was in working order and appropriate administrative and
logistical support was available. They conducted briefings with
directors of their organizations. They managed and coordinated the
execution of the exercise and provided substantive comments for the
After Action Report.

What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?

NOAA met all FC06 overarching and NOAA internal exercise objectives. It
fully performed its essential functions and responded to all taskings in
a timely manner. FC06 presented an excellent opportunity for NOAA to
test its All Hazards CONOPS, fully test the employee accountability
system, and provide additional COOP training.

# **Additional Information** 

How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?

Preparation began in the Summer of 2005. Lessons learned from a COOP
exercise in June 2005 and the catastrophic hurricane season pointed out
necessary improvements to COOP SOP and incident management processes.
New procedures were incorporated in the NOAA COOP Plan which was
approved and signed in April 2006. Several meetings were held to develop
a scenario, propose exercise injects and expected player actions that
would sufficiently test NOAA's ability to perform its essential
functions.

What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

NOAA's effectiveness earned recognition from the Department. The
exercise strengthened NOAA's preparedness to respond to threatened or
actual domestic incidents and provided the mechanism to collect
information required to assess and validate the COOP Plan and identify
any corrective actions.

What is the short-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

NOAA's successful COOP ensures four of DOC's Priority Mission Essential
Functions can be accomplished.

Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other Federal
agencies? If so, how?

Yes. NOAA's successful COOP is essential to support a multitude of
Federal agencies requiring NOAA products and services.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?

> NOAA was able to fully test its employee accountability system.
> Overall, the test was a success with 4700 employees and contractors
> successfully logging into the redesigned system. A few technical and
> design issues were encountered and will be addressed.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?

This was the first COOP exercise where the staff on-site at NCDC
supported the COOP team in COOP activities and incident management. The
nominees provided the staff at NCDC several training sessions in
Incident Command System and ICC SOP prior to the exercise. As a result,
the NCDC staff proved a valuable asset to the COOP team. NOAA now has a
team it can rely on to prepare the alternate site for the COOP team's
arrival and begin COOP activities while the COOP team is in transit.

**NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE
NOMINATIONS**

**Steven Ansari**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #8**

Number range CHAPTER**[Nominee:]{.underline}**

Steve Ansari (an-SAR-ee)

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC

Physical Scientist/ ZP-1340-III

**[Past awards:]{.underline}**

NOAA Employee of the Month, April 2006

**[Nominator:]{.underline}**

Stephen Del Greco, Chief, Data Processing Branch

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC

**[Category:]{.underline}** Scientific/Engineering Achievement

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The Weather Radar Visualization and Data Exporter development effort
greatly enhanced the availability and use of National Weather Service
NEXRAD data and products.

**[Certificate citation:]{.underline}** For outstanding support to the
NOAA NEXRAD radar program by developing radar display and data exporter
tools.

**Section 1. Definitions**

NEXRAD: **Nex**t Generation **Rad**ar

NEXRAD Level II: Level II data are the three meteorological base data
quantities: reflectivity, mean radial velocity, and spectrum width.

NEXRAD Level III products: 41 products derived from Level II, mostly
images, e.g. echo intensity and echo top for detecting precipitation and
storm features

GEO-IDE: Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) Integrated
Data Environment (IDE).

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

National Weather Service's Principal User Processors (PUP) were first
decommissioned in 2002, an event which eliminated the ability to provide
NEXRAD radar images to customers who used the data retrospectively. This
loss of service to customers, including the National Weather Service
(NWS), was unacceptable and NCDC had the challenge to continue providing
images. This capability is important to NOAA's mission since NOAA's
Goals for Climate and Weather & Water include supporting research. The
NEXRAD data archive is critical to NOAAs research projects such as
improving severe weather forecasting and climate studies that provide
the basis for such things as flood planning.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Mr. Ansari understood that the NEXRAD data were valuable for research
and critical for the customer service that NOAA provides. He had to
define the functionality that was needed for the broad spectrum of users
and then develop the tools that would benefit them. He determined that
these tools should not only maintain the PUP capability to provide
images, but also develop tools that would make the data even more
accessible.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Mr. Ansari developed "User Friendly" NEXRAD radar display and data
exporter tools. The tools he developed enhanced production of radar
images and created animations. He also understood that the value of
NEXRAD data could be enhanced if it could be used with other data. He
achieved this by using standardized formats that permit users to combine
unique radar data with other types of data for research and commercial
applications. Mr. Ansari developed Geographical Information System
visualization and data exporter tools which promoted the integration of
radar data with data from other observing systems.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Mr. Ansari's development allows NOAA's NWS, as well as other Federal
agencies, academia and the general public, to now use his tools to
export, visualize, display, and use these data. Mr. Ansari's work makes
it possible to provide: direct access to radar data, views of the data,
and the export of radar data via the NCDC Radar Resources web page URL:
[http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/radar/radarresources.html;
and](http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/radar/radarresources.html; and) NCDC
Radar Visualization/Interoperability Tools to view, analyze and export
Radar Data from multiple sources in an Open Geospatial Consortium and
Common Data Model compliant environment.

**[Section 3 -- Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Decoding, viewing, and exporting level III products were implemented in
two months. This high priority target date had to be met because the PUP
was decommissioned. NEXRAD enhancements in decoding, viewing, and
exporting level II data products were implemented within six months.
Additional enhancements, visualization, and tools to support
interoperability were completed within one year.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

It has not only been possible to continue to support NWS and the general
public with the capability of the PUP, but additional capability has
resulted in increased use of radar data and visualization for research
and forensic use.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

In order to protect the investment in future capability, NOAA is seeking
to patent the software that Mr. Ansari developed, software which already
provides improved NEXRAD images, animations, climatologies and also
supports GEO-IDE and the interoperability of data.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

These tools are used by multiple sectors.

"Weather surveillance radar isn't just about weather. NEXRAD picks up in
the atmosphere when and where there are major movements of migratory
birds.  The JAVA NEXRAD Exporter helps turn potential into reality.... 
The NEXRAD Exporter is a great advancement." Dr. Sarah Mabey, North
Carolina State University

"I have been using Java NEXRAD Viewer since October 2004 and have found
it very useful....  . . . a project is currently under way....  The Java
NEXRAD is vital to this project." Dan Berkowitz, Hydrometeorologist, NWS
Radar Operations Center

"This is a fantastic piece of software.... A process that used to take
20 hours can be done in an hour. Great stuff!" Alan Bruno, Ofloff
Consulting

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

NEXRAD, a major technological advancement, is launched via Java Web
Start and runs on the client machine while accessing data remotely from
the archive or in near real time from other servers. The Interactive
Weather Radar Viewer provides tools for custom data overlays,
animations, and basic queries. The export of images and movies is
provided in multiple formats and in both vector polygon and raster
formats.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

His tools are a key part of improved customer service which provides
direct access to NEXRAD products and data via a web-based inventory and
access page. Mr. Ansari's tools have allowed NCDC to efficiently respond
to data requests, which have gone up ten-fold since his tools were made
operational in direct web access.

**Ray Habermann**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #9**

**Full name of nominee:** Dr. Ray E. (Ted) Habermann

**Major Line or Staff Office for each nominee:** NESDIS/NGDC

**Position title and grade for each nominee:** Geophysicist,
ZP-1313-04/03

**Past awards**: Silver Medal (1995) and Bronze Medal (1998)

**Nominator's name and major Line or Staff Office:** Dr. Christopher G
Fox, Director National Geophysical Data Center /NESDIS

**Certificate citation:** For leading a standards-based systems
development effort in support of the NOAA Observing System Architecture
(NOSA) and demonstrating continued innovation in NOAA.

**Justification:**

*What is the significance of this accomplishment?*

Only through proper integration of NOAA's diverse observations, advanced
by the innovative approach conceived by Ted Habermann, can the
environmental challenges of 21st century society be addressed.

**[Section 1 (Definitions)]{.underline}**

**CIRES** -- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental
Sciences at the University of Colorado.

**EDSG** - Enterprise Data Systems Group

**GIS** - Geographic Information Systems

**OGC** -- The Open Geospatial Consortium is an international industry
consortium of 272 companies, government agencies and universities
participating in a consensus process to develop a variety of standards
for geospatial systems.

**NOSA** - NOAA Observing System Architecture

**WMS** - The OGC Web Map Server (WMS) protocol defines a simple
interface for web based mapping applications. The NOSA website gives a
sample URL construction and examples of WMS URL\'s for the NOAA
Observing Systems. Making NOAA Observatory maps available through a WMS
is an important step towards supporting access to NOAA\'s observations
using international standards.

**[Justification -- Section 2]{.underline}**

*What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?*

Dr. Habermann answered the call from Vice Admiral Lautenbacher (as
delivered in an interview in May 2005 on organizational innovation) that
NOAA scientists must learn additional skills in order to address special
management challenges of the agency. Ted's response was to follow a few
simple tenets:

-   Continuous innovation is clearly critical to NOAA's success.

-   Technology is evolving from a computing tool to a communication
    tool; it is becoming an infrastructure technology.

-   Standards are critical to building value of infrastructure
    technologies and are key to building effective organizational
    components and architectural innovation.

*What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?*

In 2002, the NOAA Program Review Team concluded that "NOAA centrally
plan and integrate all observing systems." NESDIS was given the lead to
coordinate this project, and the NOSA team was formed. Ted took a
leadership role in this effort and marshaled the resources of his EDSG,
comprised of CIRES researchers, to apply state of the art technologies
in the development of a spatial relational database management system
and geographic search applications that allow users of all backgrounds
to discover NOAA assets around the globe. NOSA could be considered a
bell weather project for whether or not the "One NOAA" mission as
conceived by the Vice Admiral Lautenbacher and proclaimed in the NOAA
Strategic Plan can be realized.

*What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

Through Ted's expert leadership, EDSG brings together GIS, Relational
Databases, and the Internet to demonstrate the evolution from computing
to communications and the increasing importance of standards. The
foundation of the architecture of the NOSA website is a geospatial
database implemented using Oracle Spatial. A variety of access
approaches have been implemented on top of that database using
commercial and standards-based tools.

*What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

The NOSA geospatial database system supports numerous types of spatial
queries. The NOSA interactive map utilizes this database and provides
access to the observing systems home pages as well as access to
real-time data. The technology developed for the interactive map is also
being used widely at NGDC. The number of Internet map hits/month has
grown to 100,000, while the website receives 40,000 hits/month. The NOSA
spatial web portal provides access to over 500 environmental parameters
from over 100 disparate observation systems of NOAA.

**[Justification -- Section 3 (Additional Information)]{.underline}**

*How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?*

-   Development commenced Fall 2002.

-   NOSA Webpage deployed Spring 2004.

-   OGC-WMS implementation Spring 2005.

-   Google Earth implementation Spring 2006.

*What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?*

As part of the NOAA's NOSA Action Group, Ted's EDSG group has
contributed a major web portal for accessing vital information about
NOAA's observing systems. The most significant impact is searches that
have taken days to obtain information about a disparate set of NOAA
observing systems now are measured within minutes. He has hosted
workshops for the NOSA team, and cyclical meetings and data calls will
provide further integration between all of NOAA's line offices.

*What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?*

The development and support of geospatial search tools will be critical
in the building of NOAA observational architecture by designing
observing systems that support NOAA\'s mission and provide maximum
value, avoids duplication of existing systems, and operates efficiently
and in a cost-effective manner.

*Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?*

The techniques used to develop the NOSA spatial database are widely
viewed in NOAA as far thinking and visionary and are being adopted by
many bureaus. The interagency/academic/commercial Federation of Earth
Science Information Partners has named Ted to lead the development of
their ESIP data portal.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?*

This project demonstrates the application of a spatial database to
support a myriad of search tools for a broad audience to obtain
information about a diversity of observation systems in NOAA. The
establishment of a spatial portal via Internet mapping and geospatial
text searches instituted a new access approach under one umbrella for
observation system web pages. Ted led the EDSG team in implementing an
Open Geospatial Consortium Web Map Server that allows for multiple types
of GIS systems to interact with NOSA data layers. His latest goal of
integrating NOSA into Google Earth has been realized as well.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how? *

The NOSA website offers a number of tools for a wide spectrum of users
within the NOAA user community and markedly improved the information
retrieval time of searches on a disparate set of NOAA observatories.
Ted's foresight of bringing observatory data from a myriad of websites
into a centralized spatial database and a centralized point of access is
noteworthy given the power it provides users to gather NOAA-wide
information efficiently and in an integrated fashion.

**Brian Hughes/Thomas Renkevens**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #10**

**(Originally submitted as Silver; not forwarded by NIAB)**

**Title:** GOES Ingest NOAAPORT Interface (GINI) Data Processing Back-up
System.

**Candidate Award Recipients:**

Brian Hughes, NESDIS/OSDPD Operations Manager (ZP-1340-4)

Thomas Renkevens, NESDIS/OSD GOES-R Operations and Customer Liaison

(ZP-1301-4)

**Past Awards:**

Thomas Renkevens - Administrators Award, 1999; Silver Group Medal 2003

**Nominator:**

David Benner, NESDIS/OSDPD, Chief, Satellite Services Division

**Significance of the Accomplishment:**

The team designed and implemented an IT solution that eliminated a
critical single point of failure for the transmission of NOAA satellite
imagery, thus significantly enhancing the ability to satisfy NOAA
mission goal requirements.

**Certificate Text:**

For designing and implementing a backup system to eliminate a single
point of failure for NOAA satellite imagery, thus ensuring continuity of
mission critical operations.

## *Justification:*

**Section 1 - Definitions**

BNCF - Backup Network Control Facility

CDA - Command Data Acquisition station

CIP - Critical Infrastructure Protection plan

CM - Configuration Management

COOP - Continuity of Operations Plan

GOES - Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite

FB4 - Federal Building #4

GINI - GOES Ingest NOAAPORT Interface system processes and distributes

geostationary satellite image data.

GVAR - GOES VARiable data is real-time direct readout GOES satellite
imagery.

NCF - Network Control Facility

NWS - National Weather Service

NESDIS - NOAA Satellite and Information Service

### Section 2 -- Award Justification

• **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The challenge addressed by the team resulted from a NOAA study published
in October 2004 that evaluated responsiveness during Hurricane Isabel.
Recommendations were provided to improve NOAA hurricane and severe
weather support activities. An offsite backup capability for the primary
GINI system located in FB4 in Suitland, MD was deemed critical to
national security and NOAA's mission to protect life and property. Since
the GINI had no back up system, yet provided mission critical satellite
imagery to the NWS, NESDIS was tasked to implement this back up
capability and eliminate the single point of failure.

• **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Due to the severity of the 2005 Atlantic storm season, the team urgently
worked to design, develop and implement a backup GINI system that would
ensure continuity of operations for GOES satellite imagery. The GINI
ingests and processes real-time GVAR image and sounder data into
geo-located calibrated images that are transferred to the NWS NCF in
Silver Spring, MD for distribution to users via NOAAPORT. The backup
GINI system located at the CDA station in Wallops, VA processes and
transfers GVAR data to the NWS BNCF in Fairfield, WVA for dissemination,
and is completely independent of the primary GINI system.

**• What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The action to design and implement the GINI backup system was given high
priority with progress closely monitored by NOAA senior management. The
team developed a solution, designed the system, identified resources,
selected the site and successfully installed, tested and implemented
into operations the GINI backup system. The team established and tested
failover procedures, adhered to CM principles and ensured network/system
security by negotiating cooperative service agreements between several
NOAA organizations. This work was done without any additional funding.

**• What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The team eliminated a single point of failure for a national "Mission
Critical" data processing system. The GINI, part of the OSDPD
Environmental Satellite Processing System (ESPC), provides critical
environmental satellite information to NWS Field Offices, National
Centers for Environmental Prediction and many other Government agencies
charged with the protection of life and property. The backup GINI system
ensures delivery of GVAR satellite data in case of localized system
failure or larger-scale emergencies requiring NOAA COOP activations.

**Section 3 - Additional Information**

**• How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?  When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

One year. The team was assigned the task to draft and present a
conceptual backup GINI system design in February 2005. Resources were
identified and management approval was obtained in May 2005. The
installation of the Wallops GINI system was completed in December 2005
with final testing and certification completed in February 2006.

**• What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission? **

The primary and backup GINI systems provide "mission critical" satellite
data and products that are used by numerous NOAA Mission Goals and
Programs to meet their mission objectives and requirements. Users such
the NWS Field Offices, National Hurricane Center and Severe Weather
Center are ensured a continuous, uninterrupted flow of near real-time
GOES imagery for use in tropical storm prediction, flooding and severe
weather forecasts.

**• What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

NOAA Critical Infrastructure Plans for backup data processing systems
address a critical shortfall in ensuring continuity of IT operations
during localized or large-scale system, network or power outages. The
successful development and deployment of the backup GINI system
represents a first step and foundation for future collaborative IT
backup operations that improve the quality and reliability of NOAA data
information services.

**• Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies?  If so, how?**

The establishment of the backup GINI system ensures the uninterrupted
availability of GOES satellite imagery that is used as a primary data
source for ensuring the accuracy of severe weather forecasts. GVAR data
products are of critical importance to the NOAA Weather and Water
Mission Goal Team, the NWS, and Federal Government agencies charged with
nation security, public safety, disaster planning and recovery and
protection of life and property.

**• Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation?  If so, how?**

The establishment of the backup GINI system was the first step in
establishing critical infrastructure protection for the delivery of
mission critical GOES satellite imagery.

**• Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
support?  If so, how?**

The backup GINI system improves the consistency and quality of NOAA
customer service by eliminating temporary outages and the loss or delay
of critically important and time sensitive satellite data. Surveys
indicate that GINI image products and their availability are rated the
highest importance and value to user mission goals.

**Thomas Baldwin Group**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #11**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**Title:** Real-time Satellite Analysis Support during Hurricane Katrina

**Candidate Award Recipients:**

NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Satellite Analysis Branch

**Individual Line/Staff Office Title Grade**

Thomas Baldwin NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Alonzo Brown NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Gregory Gallina NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-III

Jay Hanna NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-III

Brian Hughes NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Physical Scientist ZP-1301-IV

Charles Kadin NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Jamie Kibler NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-III

Sheldon Kusselson NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Nancy Merckle NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-III

Mark Ruminski NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Alan Schwartz NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-III

John Simko NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-III

Davida Streett NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Physical Scientist ZP-1301-IV

Grace Swanson NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Michael Turk NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

Regis Walter NESDIS/OSDPD/SSD Meteorologist ZP-1340-IV

**Past Awards:**

Grace Swanson 2000 Bronze (Washington Volcanic Ash Advisory Center)

Charles Kadin 2001 Group Bronze (Satellite Precipitation Autoestimator)

Sheldon Kusselson 2001 Group Bronze (Satellite Precipitation
Autoestimator)

Thomas Baldwin 2001 Group Bronze (Satellite Precipitation Autoestimator)

John Simko 2001 Group Bronze (Satellite Precipitation Autoestimator)

**Nominator:**

David Benner, NESDIS/OSDPD, Chief, Satellite Services Division

**Significance of the Accomplishment:** The Satellite Analysis Branch
provided critical satellite support to federal agencies and the public
during one of the most destructive hurricanes on record, in alignment
with NOAA's overarching goal to save lives and property.

**Certificate Text:**

For providing exemplary, operational satellite analysis support to the
National Weather Service and other Government organizations during
Hurricane Katrina.

**Justification**

**Section 1 -- Definitions**

AA - Assistant Administrator

CIMSS - Center for Meteorological Satellite Studies

DHS - Department of Homeland Security

GOES - Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite

HSPO - Homeland Security Program Office

HPC - Hydrometeorological Prediction Center

HSOC - Homeland Security Operations Center

ICC - Incident Coordination Center

MS - Mississippi

NESDIS - National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Services

NWS - National Weather Service

OSO - Office of Satellite Operations

OSDPD - Office of Satellite Data Processing and Distribution

RFC - River Forecast Center

RSO - Rapid Scan Operational

SAB - Satellite Analysis Branch

SITREP - SITuation REPort

SSD - Satellite Services Division

TB - Terrabytes, or 10

TPC - Tropical Prediction Center

WFO - Weather Forecast Office

**Section 2 - Award Justification**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The NOAA Mission Goal addressed by this accomplishment is to: Serve
Society's Need for Weather and Water Information and the cross-cutting
priority of Ensuring Sound, State-of-the-Art Research.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Katrina was the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928 and the most
expensive on record with \$34.4 billion in insured losses. The SAB, in
support of NOAA's mission to protect life and property, provided
critically needed information to the NWS, DHS and other decision making
Government agencies on a 24x7 basis.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

SAB provided satellite derived hurricane position/intensity
classifications and pre-landfall accumulated rainfall projections to the
TPC; satellite precipitation estimates and trends for impacted coastal
areas to 33 WFOs, 5 RFCs and the HPC; scheduled over 125 hours of
specially requested GOES RSO imagery in support of NWS requirements;
24x7 staff support to the HSOC NOAA Desk that included briefings for
Secretary Chertoff and provided daily satellite SITREPs to the NOAA ICC
before, during and after storm landfall. All efforts were accomplished
despite staffing shortages and performing other SAB duties such as the
monitoring of Pacific/Indian Ocean storms, issuing volcanic ash
advisories and providing support for unprecedented levels of website
activity by the public.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

SAB satellite information was used as an independent and critically
important data source by the NWS Hurricane Center in the initialization
of forecast models to project the track/intensity of hurricanes, by HPC
in the generation of quantitative precipitation forecasts (a NWS metric
reported to Congress) and by numerous WFO's in the issuance of official
flash flood warnings. These activities directly support NOAA/NWS
performance measures of hurricane forecast track error, accuracy of
daily precipitation forecasts and accuracy of severe flash flood
warnings. SAB rainfall estimates took on added significance for flash
flood forecast during an extended radar outage in Jackson, MS.

**Section 3 - Additional Information**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The accomplishments of SAB in support of Hurricane Katrina encompassed
the 10 day period from detection of the tropical disturbance through
landfall.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

SAB support is critical for NOAA Mission Goals and Programs to meet
their mission objectives. Users, such WFO's and NWS Centers, are ensured
delivery of timely and high quality satellite-based analyses for use in
tropical storm prediction, flooding and severe weather forecasts.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Through experience gained with Katrina and other 2005 storms, SAB will
be more involved in collaborative tests and evaluations of new
techniques in tropical storm classification. These new tools will
significantly improve NOAA efforts to mitigate the effects of such
extreme weather events and support society's need for information as
encompassed by NOAA's Weather and Water Goal.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

SAB Katrina support institutionalized the organizations' support for
NOAA-specific (ICC) and external agency (DHS) disaster mitigation
efforts. The daily SITREPs provided by SAB provided critical information
for storm preparedness and recovery decisions by HSPO, DHS and other
agencies.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

During Katrina, SAB served as a test bed for the evaluation of an
automated objective tropical storm classification technique that has
potential for streamlining operations and augmenting/replacing the
traditional subjective analyses. Results from comparative performance
tests by SAB have been used by a research partner (CIMSS) in the
development of a new release that will be run in operational mode during
the 2006 storm season.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

SAB developed a NESDIS web site that consolidated access to all
satellite information pertaining to Katrina, for use by NWS, ICC and the
public. This technique was then used in support of subsequent hurricanes
(including Rita) and will be part of the NESDIS contribution to the
planned Storm Page of the NOAA Hazards Portal site. As reference, over
210 million hits and 6 TB of data were disseminated from SSD web sites
for the week period prior to Katrina landfall.

**Susan McLean Group**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #12**

**Type of Award:** Bronze Group Award -- Administrative/Technical
Support

**Name of Nominee:** Susan J. McLean

**Line Office:** National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information
Service (NESDIS), Project Coordinator

**Title**: Physical Scientist

**Series and Grade: ZP-1301-IV**

**Name of Nominee:** Joy A. Ikelman

**Line Office:** National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information
Service (NESDIS), Editor

**Title**: Physical Scientist

**Series and Grade: ZP-1301-III**

**Name of Nominee:** Krisa M. Arzayus

**Line Office:** Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR)

**Title**: Oceanographer

**Series and Grade: ZP-1360-IV**

**Name of Nominee:** Timothy P. Eichler

**Line Office:** Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR)

**Title**: Physical Scientist

**Series and Grade: ZP-1301-III**

**Name of Nominee:** Russell H. Beard

**Line Office:** National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information
Service (NESDIS) representing NOAA Ecosystems Mission Goal

**Title**: NCDDC Chief Scientist, NCDDC Oceanographer

**Series and Grade: ZP-1360-IV**

**Name of Nominee:** David Helms

**Line Office:** National Weather Service (NWS) representing NOAA
Weather and Water Mission Goal

**Title**: NWS Observing System Focal Point, Physical Scientist

**Series and Grade:** 1301 / GS 14

**Name of Nominee:** Maureen R. Kenny

**Line Office:** National Ocean Service (NOS) representing NOAA Commerce
and Transportation Mission Goal

**Title**: Deputy Chief, Coast Survey Development Laboratory

**Series and Grade: GS-1301-15**

**Name of Nominee:** Glenn K. Rutledge

**Line Office:** National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information
Service (NESDIS) representing NOAA Climate Mission Goal

**Title**: Physical Scientist

**Series and Grade: ZP-1301-IV**

**Name of Nominee:** David Meiselman

**Line Office:** Office of the Undersecretary of Commerce for Oceans and
Atmosphere (USEC) representing NOAA Mission Support Goal -- Homeland
Security

**Title**: Program Analyst

**Series and Grade: GS-343 14/8**

**Name of Nominee:** Steven L. Swartz

**Line Office:** National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)

**Title**: Ecosystem Observing Program Coordinator

**Series and Grade: ZP 0482 Band V**

**Other NOAA Awards:** McLean -- DOC Silver Medal, October 1994

Ikelman -- None

Arzayus -- None

Eichler -- None known

Beard -- None

Helms -- NOAA Bronze Medal, December 1999

Kenny -- None

Meiselman -- None known

Rutledge -- NOAA Administrator\'s Award;

NOAA EEO Distinguished Service Award;

Swartz -- NOAA Bronze - 1997

**Nominator:** Dr. Christopher G. Fox, Director National Geophysical
Data Center/ NESDIS

**Category:** Administrative/Technical Support

**Certificate Citation:** For planning and executing the first
comprehensive assessment of NOAA's data management capabilities,
critical for accomplishing the agency's mission goals.

**Justification:**

*What is the significance of this accomplishment?*

This first full comprehensive assessment of NOAA's data systems by
Mission Goal identified common challenges, established a framework, and
resulted in a Report to Congress and a detailed NOAA management report.

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

Public Law 102-567, Section 106 (c) Data And Information Systems (PL
102-567)

Data Management and Communications (DMAC)

Integrated Earth Observing System (IEOS)

Global Earth Observation -- Integrated Data Environment (GEO-IDE)

Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)

Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)

Program, Planning, Budgeting, and Execution System (PPBES)

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

*What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Agency's mission/or Strategic Plan?*

The goal was to conduct the first comprehensive NOAA-wide assessment of
data management capabilities, to both meet obligations under PL 102-567
and as an essential first steps in efforts to develop integrated
observation acquisition, quality control, archive, and delivery systems
supporting NOAA's crosscutting priority of *Integrating Global
Environmental Observation and Data Management*.

*What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?*

In October 2004, NOAA assembled a cross-Line Office and cross-Goal team
to develop a comprehensive and sustainable strategy for assessing NOAA's
current and near-future data management capability. The team, working
with the 45 Program Managers, four Mission Goal leads, and Support
Mission sub-Goal leads, completed the assessment, identified successes
and challenges unique to Programs/Mission Goals and common across the
Agency, and suggested a strategy for building on successes and
addressing challenges consistent with objectives of important national
and international data activities.

*What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

The team developed and conducted a NOAA-wide data assessment resulting
in two reports. The Report to Congress describes NOAA's capability to
manage, archive, and disseminate environmental data and information;
identifies data management successes and challenges across NOAA, and
recommends steps to address these challenges as required under PL
102-567. The NOAA technical report provides management the complete
assessment by Mission Goal and Program and expands on the data successes
and challenges.

*What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

This work resulted in the formal bi-annual *Report to Congress on NOAA's
Data and Information Management* (October 2005) and in a comprehensive
NOAA report, sponsored by the NOAA Data Management Committee, *NOAA's
Environmental Data Management: Integrating the Pieces* (March 2006)*.*
In addition to the reports, the NOAA team initiated a sustainable
framework for conducting future assessments, and tracking success in
addressing data management challenges.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

*How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?*

The assessment, analysis, writing, document review, and publication of
both documents took a total of 19 months beginning in October 2004 and
ending in April 2005.

*What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?*

The Report to Congress addresses NOAA's bi-annual requirement as defined
in PL 102-567. The NOAA Data Management Report provides NOAA and the
NOAA Data Management Committee a tool for identifying data management
needs and planning resources in a coordinated manner across the Agency.
The National Research Council's *Preliminary Principles and Guidelines
for Archiving Environmental and Geospatial Data at NOAA: Interim Report*
referenced the Data Management Report*.*

*What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?*

The Team's efforts established a sustainable framework for future NOAA
Data Management Reports to Congress and developed a mechanism for NOAA
management to monitor and direct data and information management
activities. This assessment will be a key input in the development of
the comprehensive GEO-IDE for all of NOAA. The GEO-IDE will be a major
NOAA contribution to GEOSS.

*Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?*

The team worked to ensure that the 10-year improvement strategies
detailed in both Reports were consistent with, and supportive, of the
IOOS DMAC plan and the goals of IEOS and GEOSS. NOAA management and
delivery of environmental data affects all agencies participating in or
using data delivered through IEOS and GEOSS (i.e. -- local, state,
national, and international levels).

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?*

No.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?*

The Team's work established an important baseline for future
assessments, allowing a quantitative measure of improvement performance
in this vital area of NOAA's mission. This work provides an invaluable
framework for action as well as a management tool for identifying data
management needs and prioritizing resources. NOAA Mission Goals and
Programs are already incorporating the findings of the assessment team
into the PPBES.

**Tom Schott Group**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #13**

**Satellite Process Improvement Working Group**

**Candidate Award Recipients**

Tom Schott, NESDIS/OSD, Polar Satellite Products Manager (ZP-4)

Dave Benner, NESDIS/OSDPD, Chief, Satellite Services Division (ZP-5)

Antonio Irving, NESDIS/OSDPD, Products Implementation Branch Chief
(ZP-5)

Selina Nauman, NESDIS/OSDPD, SPSRB Manager (ZP-4)

Brian Hughes, NESDIS/OSDPD, Operations Manager (ZP-4)

Eileen Maturi, NESDIS/ORA, Oceanographer (ZP-3)

Hank Drahos, NESDIS/STAR Chief, Operational Products Development Branch
(ZP-5)

**Past Awards**

Selina M. Nauman, Silver Medal (Oct 1994)

Antonio Irving -- Bronze Medal (Dec 1997), Silver Medal (Sep 2000)

**Nominator:** Michael Mignogno, NESDIS/OSD Polar Satellite Program
Manager

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**

The satellite process improvement working group implemented new
processes that significantly enhanced NOAA's fulfillment of mission
requirements for environmental satellite information.

**[Certificate
Text:](http://www.rdc.noaa.gov/~hrmo/medaltextlimitations.htm) ** For
improved transition of environmental satellite products from research to
operations with a dedicated focus on critical mission requirements.

**Justification**

**Section 1 - Definitions**

***None***

**Section 2 - Award Justification.**

• **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The group was formed to optimize NOAA's response to the growing customer
requirements for new or improved environmental satellite products.

• **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

By forming an inter-office team with all required disciplines the group
was able to optimize the use of available resources to maximize the user
benefit.

**• What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The group implemented processes to dramatically improve satellite
product transition from research to operations. They prioritized
customer needs and implemented streamlined procedures of satellite
product development to satisfy those needs.

The team implemented a technical assessment process that ensures the
most cost effective approach to satisfy NOAA user's requirements. They
standardized the internal process for evaluating the merits of competing
product development proposals relative to user requirements. The group
outlined innovative ways to better address NOAA mission goal needs for
environmental observations. They led efforts to define archive processes
to ensure the proper satellite data is archived and accessible,
improving the use of satellite information across all of NOAA These
improved processes will ensure that limited resources are applied to the
most critical mission needs.

**• What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Over the past year the group has transitioned a number of products from
research to ops and their benefits can be directly quantified. The
transition of Polar Winds Model impact studies at eight major numerical
weather prediction (NWP) centers have demonstrated that model forecasts
for the Northern and Southern Hemispheres are improved when MODIS polar
winds are assimilated.  Forecasts can be extended 2-6 hours, depending
on the location.  Hurricane track forecasts are also improved.  Society
benefits from the increased model forecast skills are far reaching since
weather impact nearly 30-40% of U.S. industries or \$3 trillion of the
Nation\'s Gross Domestic Product. Transitioning the Land Surface
Temperature helps NWP model define the boundary layer conditions for
model initialization which improves model performance at high levels in
the atmosphere.  Society benefits from the increased model forecast
skills are far reaching since weather impact nearly 30-40% of U.S.
industries or \$3 trillion of the Nation\'s Gross Domestic Product.

  **Section 3 - Additional Information**.

• **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?  When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The group was formed in 2004 and the product development plans were
applied to the 2005 and 2006 efforts

**• What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission? **

Improved procedures ensure management consideration of prioritized
customer needs which will maximize the benefit derived from new
capabilities transitioned from research into operations. Current and
future satellite product development will be linked to NOAA Mission Goal
and Program mission capability needs.

**• What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Procedures will infuse environmental satellite research results more
efficiently into operations, making vital information more readily
available to decision makers. The foundation for linking satellite
product development to NOAA Mission Goal and Program needs has been laid
and improved processes will ensure high priority items are addressed
over the long-term.

• **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies?  If so, how?**

The improved processes are being applied to address National needs
identified by other federal agencies including the Departments of
Defense, Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Emergency
Management Agency and others and will ultimately be expanded to address
international requirements of NOAA's partners*.*

• **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation?  If so, how?**

The new processes will reduce the time to transition new science into
operations by ensuring resources are applied to our efforts and projects
are managed appropriately.

• **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
support?  If so, how?**

This team has set up processes to more efficiently address customer
needs leading to greater customer satisfaction within the limit of
existing resources.

**Dawn Anders Group**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #14**

**Bronze Medal for NESDIS e-Government System (NeS) Team**

**[List of Nominees]{.underline}**

[NCDC]{.underline}

Dawn W. Anders

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/CSD/DAB

IT Specialist, ZP-2210-IV

NeS Team Leader

1999 Bronze Medal Group Award

William O. Brown

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/CSD/CSB

Meteorologist, ZP-1340-III

2000 Bronze Medal Group Award

Katherine A. Fincher

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/CSD/DAB

IT Specialist, ZP-2210-III

2003 Bronze Medal Group Award

Sharon K. Hawkins

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/CSD/DAB

IT Specialist, ZP-2210-III

None

Cynthia B. Karl

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/DOD/CDMP

IT Specialist, ZP-2210-III

None

Douglas G. McElreath

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/SSD/ITB

IT Specialist, ZP-2210-III

None

Tammy Scott

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/DOD/AB

IT Specialist, ZP-2210-III

None

Margaret K. Tessier

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/SSD/ITB

IT Specialist, ZP-2220-III

None

Janet S. Wall

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/CSD/CSB

Meteorological Technician, ZP-1341-III

2002 NOAA Administrator's Award

[NODC]{.underline}

Mary B. Hollinger

NOAA/NESDIS/NODC

Oceanographer, ZP-1360-IV

None

[NGDC]{.underline}

Kathleene A. Martin

NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC

Scientific Data Specialist, ZA-0301-III

None

Robin R. Warnken

NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC

Oceanographer, ZP2360-III

None

**[Nominator:]{.underline}**

Neal Lott

NOAA/NESDIS/NCDC/CSD/DAB

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment:]{.underline}**

The NESDIS e-Government System (NeS) team set up NeS to handle order
transactions, financial, and many other aspects of customer servicing.
This supported the President's Management Agenda by advancing
e-government for NOAA and DOC.

**[Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For implementing an e-Government system across three NESDIS Data
Centers, to process all orders for digital and non-digital data.

**[Section 1 - Definitions]{.underline}**

CLASS: Comprehensive Large Array-data Stewardship System

COTS: Commercial Off-The-Shelf product

DVD: Digital Versatile Disk (formerly Digital Video Disk)

FTP: File Transfer Protocol

NCDC: National Climatic Data Center

NeS: NESDIS e-Government System---the system developed by the NeS team

NGDC: National Geophysical Data Center

NODC: National Oceanographic Data Center

RCC: Regional Climate Centers\--six regional climate centers across the
country, which specialize in service to their section of the country

**[Section 2 - Award Justification]{.underline}**

[What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?]{.underline}

Following the NOAA Strategic Goal, *Serve society's needs for weather
and water information,* and the President's Management Agenda
(initiative four, expanded electronic government) the NeS team's goal
was to choose the best e-commerce software product to meet Data Center
order management requirements for the foreseeable future, and then to
tailor and implement the e-Government system to ensure all requirements
for a very diverse clientele were fully met. Key challenges included: a)
identifying and using competitive sourcing to the government and
taxpayer's advantage---ensuring that the best COTS product and
contractor were selected; b) creating a centralized, efficient system
rather than several tailored systems to complete each type of data
order; and c) having a system that could be easily extended to include
new products and servicing centers in the future.

[What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?]{.underline}

The three NESDIS Data Centers collectively service over 4000 paid orders
for data per month, resulting in over \$2 million in reimbursable
revenue for DOC per year. This includes a wide variety of products, from
100-year old publications to very large volumes of data on DVD or via
FTP. The new system had to be very versatile to efficiently interact
with call receivers, handle both off-line (e.g., orders by phone) and
on-line orders, properly manage cash flow, and interface with existing
data access systems.

[What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?]{.underline}

The NeS team, in addition to continual support to operational customer
service required for their positions, developed and implemented a plan
to: a) solicit proposals from potential companies with software to fit
the Data Center needs; b) gather all requirements and ensure good
configuration management from beginning to end of process; c) carefully
evaluate and select the best company to implement the chosen software;
d) ensure a long-term smooth flow of operations using best business
practices; e) tailor and implement the e-Government software at NCDC,
NGDC and NODC; and f) further expand the system to include the RCCs and
CLASS.

[What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?]{.underline}

NeS is now fully implemented at the three Data Centers for all off-line
and on-line orders. Also, it is now being used at the Southeast Regional
Climate Center and for CLASS orders.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information]{.underline}**

[How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?]{.underline}

NeS was implemented in phases, with Phase 1 (for off-line orders)
completed on October 1, 2004 after a two-year effort. This was fully
in-line with NeS team milestones, an ambitious goal for such a large
effort. Phase 2 was implemented during FY06, with a) NeS now handling
all on-line orders via new Online Store software (a component of NeS);
b) CLASS satellite data orders requiring payment now being processed via
NeS; and c) one RCC (the Southeast RCC) now using NeS.

[What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?]{.underline}

The predecessor system was obsolete in its technology, unable to be
expanded, and unable to operate in more recent operating system
environments. NeS overcame those problems and added additional
capabilities and tools for the users. Also, reports and business
statistics are being generated from NeS to provide the Data Centers with
critical information about its customer base, such as identifying which
datasets are most used.

[What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?]{.underline}

The long-term impacts include: a) ability to handle continued expansion
in data available on-line; b) ability to interact with new technologies,
such as telephony services (e.g., interactive web-based discussion with
customers); and c) fully vesting the government in software knowledge
and abilities for expansion. The ability to extend, expand, and interact
are key economic benefits to NOAA and DOC, to prevent the system from
becoming obsolete the future.

[Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?]{.underline}

The three Data Centers are using the system, and it is being expanded to
include the six RCCs, with the Southeast RCC now using NeS, along with
CLASS. It can also be expanded to other agencies.

[Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?]{.underline}

This was a major advancement in technology in being able to tailor a
commercial e-commerce product for government use, with a very wide
variety of clientele. This was very challenging in that no COTS products
already had this built-in ability.

[Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so,
how?]{.underline}

This was a major advancement in customer support in several areas: a)
more robust software to handle customer orders; b) expansion ability to
go beyond the Data Centers to include the RCCs and CLASS; c) using
"lessons learned" from past efforts to ensure the new system better
meets user and customer requirements; and d) overcoming the lack of
critical capabilities in COTS products. A very wide variety of customers
and requests are serviced, including free and paying, small to large
businesses, individuals, research institutes, engineers and foreign
customers.

**Keith Mann Group**

**NESDIS**

**Nomination #15**

**(Originally submitted as Silver; not forwarded by NIAB)**

**Nominees:**

Mr. Keith Mann -- NESDIS, OSO

GS-2210-13, IT Specialist

Past Awards: None

Mr. Dennis Mailhot -- NESDIS, OSO

GS-1311-IV, Physical Science Technician

Past Awards: None

Mr. Michael Settles -- NESDIS, OSO

ZP-1301-IV, Supervisory Physical Scientist

Past Awards: 2002 Bronze Group Medal

Mr. Albert McMath -- NESDIS, OSO

GS-2210-IV, IT Specialist

Past Awards: 2005 Bronze Group Medal

Mr. Greg Johnson -- NESDIS, OSO

ZP-855-IV, Electronics Engineer

Past Awards: 2004 Bronze Group Medal

Ms. Diane Robinson -- NESDIS, OSO\
GS-2210-IV, IT Specialist

Past Awards: 2004 Bronze Group Medal

Mr. Gary McBrien-- NESDIS, OSO

GS-2210-IV, IT Specialist

Past Awards: 2002 Bronze Group Medal

Mr. Mark Noto -- NESDIS, CIO

ZP-2210-IV, IT Specialist (INFOSEC)

Past Awards: None

Mr. Eric Clemons---NESDIS, OSD

ZP-1301-V, Supervisory Physical Scientist

Past Awards: None

**Nominator:** Kathy Kelly, NESDIS, OSO Director

**What is the significance of the accomplishment?**

Under challenging deadlines and preparations for two satellite launches,
the nominated group developed the GOES Certification and Accreditation
(C&A) package, the first NOAA system accredited, and used as a model for
all DOC systems.

**Certificate Text:** For excellence in management, technical support
and teamwork in developing the GOES Certification and Accreditation
package.

**Section 1 Definitions**

**C&A --** Certification and Accreditation

**CIO --** Chief Information Officer

**GOES -** Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites

**NC -** National Critical

**OIG** - Office of Inspector General

**Section 2 -- Award Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The Department's Inspector General had determined that problems in the
DOC C&A process merited the assessment of a Material Weakness in the
area of IT security, risking a poor rating in the President's Management
Agenda. NOAA was challenged to by the DOC to remove the material
weakness with substantial improvements in the C&A process. The nominated
team led efforts in NOAA to remove the basis for this assessment by
developing the first successful C&A package for a NOAA National Critical
(NC) System.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The team was tasked to completely revamp the C&A process for this NC
system while preparing for a new satellite launch. This was also the
first package to use new processes and formats that were not well
understood and were constantly being revised. New test and evaluation
procedures were devised for which the GOES system could be tested for
weaknesses in the IT area, all the while preserving the integrity of
critical environmental data to the nation. In addition, the GOES system
was designed in an era when IT security was not a consideration or
requirement.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The team worked closely with the NOAA CIO's office to develop system
security plan documents that addressed the deficiencies noted by the
OIG. They introduced new processes into the GOES environment including
automated patch management, development of configuration management
boards, procedures and the installation of hardware for IT security
monitoring. After C&A submission, the group supported system audits and
tests conducted by the NOAA IT security teams. All of this was
accomplished on an operational NC system during one of the busiest
hurricane seasons on record. No data was lost during this time.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

This effort culminated in the ability to provide the DOC a model C &A
package that was applied to other DOC systems. This effort increased the
reliability of systems by: Improving business contingency planning and
testing, improving individual accountability, improving system security
management, operational, technical and physical controls.

Toward the conclusion of the FY05 C&A campaign, the Director of IT
Security for the DOC CIO said that NESDIS had "earned bragging rights
across the Department" for its C&A leadership. A major portion of that
leadership was performed by the GOES C&A team.

**Section 3** **Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The initial kick off meeting was at the NOAA NESDIS headquarters on
November 10, 2004.

Certification test and evaluation for the GOES system was completed on
the May 20, 2005.

On May 31, 2005, the GOES C&A package was approved by the NESDIS
Director, (the Designated Approving Authority). Approval was granted
after the successful review package from the OIG.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The intense effort and in the development of an acceptable system
security plan and risk assessment processes was leveraged by other DOC
organizations saving time and money.

**What is the short-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The effort was a seminal effort in the improvement of the C&A process,
and its after-effects will help ensure the security of all DOC IT
systems.

GOES operations are now more secure and substantial improvements have
been made to the monitoring the security status. Continuity of
operations in the event of a site failure is greatly improved.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

This achievement created the impetus for Department of Commerce efforts
to successfully remove the Material Weakness. By providing a process and
concrete examples of acceptable documentation, other DOC organizations
will be able to develop acceptable packages with an economy of effort.
Application of the process will help ensure DOC IT systems are secure.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

No

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Prior to this effort, there was no evidence of a C&A process, nor was
there any demonstrated proof that a process could be developed and
implemented to produce acceptable C&A packages. The result of this
effort was a significant advancement in the quality and acceptability of
C&A processes and documentation sufficient to drive substantive
improvements in the security of national critical systems.

**NOAA MARINE AND AVIATION OPERATIONS NOMINATIONS**

**LCDR Debora Barr**

**NMAO**

**Nomination #16**

Full Name: Debora Regina Barr

Line Office: Office of Marine and Aviation Operations

Title and Grade: NOAA Aviation Safety, Program Manager

Lieutenant Commander, NOAA Commissioned Corps

Past Awards: NOAA Corps Commendation Medals -- February 8, 2005;
November 13, 1998

NOAA Special Achievement Awards - January 26, 2003; November 21, 2001;
August 5, 1996;

March 22, 1996

NOAA Corps Director's Ribbon -- June 5, 1996

NOAA Unit Citation Award -- January 31, 1999

NOAA Marine and Aviation Operations Employee of the Year in the
Professional/Management Category - 2002

Nominators Name: Elizabeth White/Paul Parsons (Former/Current
Supervisor)

Office of Marine and Aviation Operations

[Certificate Citation]{.underline}: For exemplary personal and
professional leadership implementing the NOAA Aviation Safety Program.

[Justification:]{.underline}

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The goal was to establish an aviation safety program within a very short
time frame. The need for a comprehensive program to account for safe
aviation support in NOAA's mission support process was indicated by
prior year program reviews and current year safety incidents during
2001. The agency did not have a procedure in place to account for all of
its outsourced aviation activities. All federal agencies are required to
report flight hours provided to the agency via the General Services
Administration's (GSA) Federal Aviation Inventory Reporting System
(FAIRS) annually and NOAA was not in compliance. The agency did not have
a safety policy for NOAA employees that use NOAA aircraft and
commercially provided aviation services, e.g. survival training,
aviation life support equipment and appropriate medical screening. The
agency did not have policy on required vendor certifications on
outsourced aircraft, e.g, pilot certifications and federal aviation
regulations the aircraft must adhere to, nor did the agency have
knowledgeable contracting personnel to ensure contracts included
appropriate language to ensure vendors met safety certifications.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Recognizing the risks to safety and related liability issues for the
agency, Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Barr implemented a plan of action
and was subsequently assigned by RADM Evelyn Fields in 2001 to initiate
the processes. Rear Admirals' Prahl and DeBow continued the support of
this goal with resources and guidance; however, as the sole officer
assigned, LCDR Barr conducted the essential communications work with key
personnel in NOAA regarding the technical needs and resource
requirements for a structured aviation safety program. In fact in
October 2004, NOAA's Administrator directed a safety stand-down on all
chartered flights until the agency safety policy was completed and
promulgated. There was no precedent set for such comprehensive policy in
a NOAA Administrative Order including medical screening of all personnel
that fly supporting NOAA's data collection requirements. Through her
leadership and technical knowledge of aviation safety she was able to
assemble the support of NOAA's line and staff offices. With perseverance
for continuous improvement, LCDR Barr developed the administrative and
technical information necessary to enable the many offices and program
missions in NOAA to integrate a single standard for aviation safety into
their routine use of aircraft. On the fly, LCDR Barr had to learn how to
develop a budget for a safety program and how to hire and supervise
personnel,

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

1\) LCDR Barr began an information and awareness campaign to ensure that
Assistant Administrators and other NOAA senior leadership were aware of
the issue and could take steps to address the problem, and that
contracting officials in the administrative support centers were
educated about inserting appropriate safety clauses in all aviation
contracts and assisting in making sure outsourced flight hours were
reported to OMAO.

2\) LCDR Barr established an Memorandum of Agreement with the Department
of Interior's (DOI) Office of Aircraft Services to allow NOAA employees
to take advantage of a service provided by DOI to other federal agencies
that would a) ensure NOAA personnel access to a vendor list of service
providers that had already been scrutinized for appropriate
certifications and adherence to safety regulations, b) assist NOAA
personnel with contracting and reporting of CAS flight hours, c) allow
NOAA personnel to take advantage of aviation safety training provided by
DOI prudent for the remote and dangerous work they were involved in.

3\) LCDR Barr worked with the Line Offices to establish a NOAA
Administrative Order on aviation safety policy to regulate aviation
activities in the agency. She took action to pull Line Office
representatives with a direct interest in the agency's aviation policies
to constitute the Agency's first Aviation Safety Board, who assisted in
developing the Order and to serve as a decision-making body on all
future aviation policy-making activities.

4)  In the FY06-10 Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution
    System (PPBES) year, LCDR Barr developed the justification and
    program adjustment to establish an Aviation Safety Program within
    OMAO consisting of four Full Time Equivalents (FTE). The FTE
    would a) develop and maintain a NOAA vendor list by performing
    vendor inspections of vendors that could meet NOAA's unique mission
    requirements, and b) assist NOAA personnel with contracting CAS.
    Through the use of more cost effective group purchasing, the FTE
    would locate and offer vendors that could routinely deliver aviation
    safety training courses to NOAA personnel and procure and maintain
    personalized aviation life support equipment (ALSE). The FY06-10
    Program Decision Memorandum required that OMAO develop the Aviation
    Safety Program within its current program and in FY06, through LCDR
    Barr's diligent efforts, the establishment of the NOAA Aviation
    Safety Program is well under way. Two FTE have been hired, and two
    more vacancy announcements have been prepared and will soon be open
    for hiring.

5)  Employed the newly established NEC and NEP to obtain the essential
    cross cutting support for resource allocations .

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

NOAA significantly enhanced the safety of its employees in large part
due to LCDR Barr's leadership. NOAA is now able to track and report its
outsourced flight hours. The NAO was signed June 16, 2006 establishing
aviation safety policy for the agency. NOAA employees now receive
training and acquire survival equipment pre-planned for their flight
mission environment.

[Additional information]{.underline}:

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

2002 - Agency information and awareness of the issues

2003 -- MOA with Department of Interior established

2003 -- All outsourced flight hours tracked and entered into FAIRS

2003 -- Travel Regulations revised to align with established clearance
requirements in NAO 216-104 for commercial aviation services

2004 -- Aircraft Policy Development Workshop

2004 -- Aviation Safety Stand Down was issued by the Under Secretary

2004 -- PPBES Program Adjustment requested to establish an Aviation
Safety Program in NMAO in 2006

2005 -- Draft of NAO 209-14 on Aviation Safety Policy

2005 Aviation Safety Board established

2005 --Aviation Life Support Equipment contractor hired to serve
employees needs for survival equipment

2006 -- Program Analyst hired to develop training and vendor lists for
NOAA employees to utilize

2006 -- NAO 209-124 approved and promulgated

**What is the short term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

NOAA has significantly enhanced the safety of its employees who utilize
aircraft to accomplish NOAA's airborne data collection mission.

**What is the long term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

NOAA has significantly enhanced the safety of its employees who utilize
aircraft to accomplish NOAA's airborne data collection mission and can
continue to build on the aviation safety foundation established.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

No

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

LCDR Barr's actions promoted a major advancement in the agency's safety
policies and mitigation of liability in the potential prevention of
aircraft accidents. The potential savings in the loss of life and
damages can not be estimated.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

NOAA's contracting specialists are much more knowledgeable about the
risks of not using appropriate contract language with respect to
aviation safety and can ensure that contracts have appropriate language.
NOAA scientists have access to vendor lists that ensure proper
certifications and conformance with NOAA's safety policies. NOAA
scientists will be informed of training opportunities and provided with
discounted and properly maintained aviation life saving equipment.

Teresa Turk Group

**NMAO**

**Nomination #17**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

  ----------------------------- ------------- -------------------- --------
  Full Name of Nominee(s)       Line/Staff    Position title/grade Past
                                Office                             Awards

  **NOAA Wilma Team Members**                                      

  Teresa Turk                   NMFS          Team Leader, ZP4     None

  Gregory Scott Raymond         OMAO          Team Member, GS-11   None

  Dennis Shields                OMAO          Team Member, GS-14   None

  Juan Levesque                 NMFS          Team Member, GS-11   None

  Pam Polmateer                 NMFS          Team Member., GS-12  None

  John Lord                     NWS           Team Member, GS-14   None

  **NOAA Katrina Team Member**                                     

  Michele Clark                 OMAO          Team Member, GS-7    None
  ----------------------------- ------------- -------------------- --------

**[Nominator's name and major Line or Staff Office]{.underline}**: CAPT
Jon Bailey, OMAO

**[Certificate citation]{.underline}**:

For establishing the first Florida Hurricane Disaster Recovery Center
and processing over 5,700 personnel that were affected by Hurricane
Wilma as well as contributions to post Katrina response.

**[Justification]{.underline}**:

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Answered the Department of Commerce's call for volunteers to support
FEMA's hurricane relief efforts.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Under the direction of their team leader, Ms. Teresa Turk, from the
NMFS/Science and Technology Office-National Observer Program, the NOAA
Wilma team quickly established relationships with the Chiefs' of Police
and fire department, city manager, Red Cross, Salvation Army, and other
state, county, and city officials. Their efforts to quickly establish
these critical connections resulted in the standup of the first Disaster
Recovery Center (DRC) in the state of Florida.

Ms. Clark was deployed through FEMA to the Jackson, Mississippi Disaster
Recovery Center to work with victims of Hurricane Katrina. There were
unprecedented numbers of victims of Katrina moving north to escape the
storm for shelter and food and other assistance. Volunteers such as
Michele Clark provided support and assistance aiding citizens in
desperate need and crisis. The personal sacrifices, emotional challenges
and tireless efforts of these Government employees, directly facilitated
expedient relief to the victims and evacuees of the storms.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Within two days of activating their DRC, the Wilma team assisted more
survivors making their way through the "tent" offices than any other DRC
in Florida. They assisted approximately 600 survivors per day for the
first couple of days and then an average of 317 personnel per day for
the remainder of their mission. With limited training and everyone's
expertise, the team was able to train themselves, establish daily work
routine, and worked hard to expedite FEMA assistance. Their daily duties
consisted of many aspects including: assessing damage within the lower
Keys; canvassing neighborhoods, so that residents were aware that there
was a DRC to assistant them; registering survivors via the intranet;
updating FEMA individual assistance applications; and giving food and
water to all who were in need. Listening to the survivors, it did not
take the team very long to assess the type of damage that the island of
Key West sustained. The team was informed that very little damage was
caused by high winds. However, several hours after the storm passed
residents began to experience a double storm surge, first from the Gulf
of Mexico and then from the Atlantic Ocean. Reports indicate that within
30-45 minutes the sea level rose and quickly flooded about 98 percent of
the island. The team was told that most places were between 4-6 feet
underwater. The water resided fairly quickly, within 2-3 hours;
nevertheless, most residents who did not evacuate, (approximately 80
percent of the population), lost their vehicles and all their personal
belongings (furniture, appliances, clothing, food). This may have been
the single worst flood disaster in Key West since the late 1920's.

The team member deployed to Jackson in response to Katrina provided very
similar disaster relief efforts as members of the Wilma group in
Florida.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Together the teams processed damage claims and assisted over 5,700
personnel affected by Hurricane Wilma and provided direct relief to
citizens in response to Katrina. The total time of contribution to the
FEMA relief effort for both teams was from October 12, 2005 to November
19, 2005.

**Section 3 - Additional Information** (Maximum number of characters for
all six questions in this section cannot exceed 2000.)

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Ms. Clark was deployed 13 October to 19 November 2005 (36 days) while
the Wilma Team was deployed 13 October to 12 November 2005 (29 days).

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Had a positive impact on the public's perception of NOAA and provided
interagency representation for NOAA. Lessons learned and best practices
received through the exchange of interagency collaboration will create
better procedures for future disaster response.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

**N/A**

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The team's hard work and dedication enabled FEMA to complete its mission
in providing support to Hurricane survivors.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

N/A

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

The team was able to provide significant customer service in the form of
assisting and supporting the needs of over 5,700 hurricane survivors.
Through daily, personal interactions with the victims of the hurricanes,
federal employees represented the agency and American government in a
very positive light and improved public relations. In addition,
interagency communication and coordination was advanced as NOAA
employees learned more about how FEMA, the Departments of Commerce and
Homeland Security as well as state governments work which will be useful
in coordinating future disaster events.

###### NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER

**NMAO**

**Nomination #18**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Response

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**

NANCY FOSTER responded quickly and effectively to the aftermath of
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The data collected by the ship supported
the re-opening of the Mobile, Alabama, and Pascagoula, Mississippi,
shipping channels and determined the health of local fisheries.

**I. [Certificate
Text:](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)**

For the quick and effective response in the aftermath of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita. *(85 characters)*

**II**. **[Program Booklet
Text:](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)
maximum of 600 characters; not required for Bronze nominations**

NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER quickly mobilized over the Labor Day weekend and
transited to the areas devastated by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Working in the area for two months, the ship's crew conducted mapping
operations, sub-bottom profiling, biological specimen sampling, trawling
operations and water profiling and sampling. The ship's work was an
integral part of the reopening of two critical local ports, as well, the
data helped determine the health of the fisheries in an area that relies
heavily on these industries for its economic health and livelihood.
*(560 characters)*

**III. Justification:**  

**Section 1 - Definitions**

[Hydrography]{.underline} - The science that deals with the measurement
and description of the physical features of the oceans and adjoining
coastal areas, with particular reference to their use for navigational
purposes.

OCS - Office of Coast Survey, NOAA's National Ocean Service

[Mapping operations]{.underline}: The acquisition and processing of
hydrographic data (soundings, location and least depth of bottom
obstructions, shoreline verification and positioning of navigation aids)
to support the update of the nautical chart for safe surface navigation.

[Sub-bottom profiling]{.underline}: low frequency sonar designed to
penetrate below the seafloor; used to discover geologic structure,
sediment layering, buried obstructions and historical artifacts.

[Biological specimen sampling]{.underline}: The act of extracting tissue
samples from marine species for analysis.

[Trawling operations]{.underline}: The act of pulling a cone shaped
fishing net through the water at prescribed depths or dragging in the
bottom. The horizontal spread of the net is maintained using "trawl
doors" that function as wings attached to the towing lines.

[Water profiling]{.underline}: The act of collecting water samples at
strategic pre-determined locations and concurrently at multiple depths
for chemical and/or biological analysis.

[Linear Nautical Miles]{.underline}. A unit of distance (approx 1.15
statute miles) used to measure the amount of data collected along a
vessel's track line.

**Section 2 - Award Justification**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

This work supported the strategic goal of providing "the information and
tools to maximize U.S. competitiveness and enable economic growth for
American industries, workers, and consumers." *(188 characters)*

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

NOAA Ship NANCY FOSTER was in Key West, FL when Hurricane Katrina passed
40 miles to the north on August 26. After the storm hit the Gulf Coast,
the ship quickly mobilized to provide a variety of support including
mapping of the seafloor, water profiles and water, sediment and
biological sampling.

*(294 characters)*

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Prior to, during, and after the hurricane, the ship relayed
meteorological information to Norfolk's Naval Meteorological Office and
NOAA's National Hurricane Center as the sensors at the Key West Weather
Office were damaged during the storm. NANCY FOSTER then transited to an
area south of Pensacola, FL to attempt to upright a 10-meter ocean data
buoy that was damaged by the storm. This buoy was later towed back to
shore. With assistance from NOAA\'s OCS the ship conducted 174 linear
nautical miles of hydrography in Mobile Ship Channel and a preliminary
survey of Pascagoula Ship Channel to verify controlling depths. The ship
collected 325 water, sediment and biological samples to measure the
river plume extent and location, and potential contamination of the
sediments and marine life. Numerous other data and information was also
collected in support of the scientific mission. The ship's mission was
covered by local and national media.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

The work done by the ship assisted in the opening of ports to ship
traffic and determined the health of the water and marine life in the
aftermath of Katrina and Rita. This allowed supplies needed for relief
efforts to arrive quicker and the health of the local fisheries, which
are essential to the area's economy, to be evaluated. Additionally, the
refinery in the Pascagoula, MS, vicinity processes over 300,000 barrels
of crude oil a day which made the opening of the port time-critical.
*(497 characters)*

**Section 3 - Additional Information**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The work was completed over a two month period including September and
October of 2005. The information was used while the ship was on scene
and later to help determine the impact of the storms on the local
fisheries and environment. *(233 characters)*

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The surveying efforts allowed ship traffic to resume sooner and carry
supplies needed in the relief effort. The scientific sampling helped
determine the health of the fisheries and environment. This work is
helping the area to rebuild, aid in the economic recovery and support
the commercial fishing industry. The ports and commercial fishing are
vital to the economic health of these coastal cities. *(399 characters)*

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The data collected by NANCY FOSTER should help the coastal communities
recover both economically and environmentally from these storms. The
data should serve as a baseline to compare against any previously
collected data and any data collected in future years or after future
hurricanes. Also, in the future, this data may be used as input for new
policies and procedures concerning storm preparedness in this and other
coastal communities. *(440 characters)*

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

This work supported NOAA's Office of Coast Survey and National Marine
Fisheries Service. Data collected will be used to update nautical charts
which are critical to safe surface navigation supporting the maritime
sector of the economy. Water, biological and sediment sampling data will
contribute to the determination of the health of local fisheries and how
regulations will affect the industry. This has a large impact to the
socio-economic issues affecting the coastal gulf communities. *(492
characters)*

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

N/A

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how? **

N/A

###### NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON

**NMAO**

**Nomination #19**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Response

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**

NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON responded quickly and effectively to the
aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The data collected by the ship
allowed for critical ports to re-open to ship traffic which assisted in
the relief and redevelopment efforts of the devastated areas.

**I. [Certificate
Text:](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)**

For the quick and effective response in the aftermath caused Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita.

**II**. **[Program Booklet
Text:](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)**

NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON quickly mobilized over Labor Day weekend and
transited to the areas devastated by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Working in the area for over two months, the ship's crew mapped the
approaches to several key ports. These mapping efforts identified areas
of shoaling and obstructions caused by the hurricanes which allowed for
the nautical charts to be quickly updated thus allowing deep draft
vessels to safely enter the port. The mapping effort was instrumental in
the initial relief effort and will continue to be a critical factor in
this region's revitalization due to the heavy reliance on ports for the
rebuilding, redevelopment and growth of the economy.

**III. Justification:** 

**Section 1 - Definitions**

[Hydrographic survey]{.underline}: The science that deals with the
measurement and description of the physical features of the oceans and
adjoining coastal areas, with particular reference to their use for
navigational purposes.

[Hydrography:]{.underline} The science that deals with the measurement
and description of the physical features of the oceans and adjoining
coastal areas, with particular reference to their use for navigational
purposes.

[Nautical chart:]{.underline} special purpose map generally designed for
purposes of ship navigation.

[Vertical water profiles:]{.underline} The act of collecting water
samples at strategic pre-determined locations and concurrently at
multiple depths for chemical and/or biological analysis.

[Survey launches:]{.underline} Small vessel in the 20-30 ft range
equipped with GPS navigation, single and/or multi-beam sonar for depth
determination and a suite of computers for running acquisition software.
Side scan sonar equipment may also be part of the suite and is used for
obtaining bottom imagery for obstruction detection. Survey launches are
used in the near-shore area and in narrow or shallow waterways where it
is neither safe nor practicable to use a ship.

[Linear Nautical Miles]{.underline}. A unit of distance (approx 1.15
statute miles) used to measure the amount of data collected along a
vessel's track line.

**Section 2 - Award Justification**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

This work supported the strategic goal of providing "the information and
tools to maximize U.S. competitiveness and enable economic growth for
American industries, workers, and consumers." NOAA's goal to "support
the nation's commerce with information for safe, efficient and
environmentally sound transportation" was also supported. *(333
characters)*

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON quickly mobilized and transited to the areas
impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita to conduct hydrographic surveys
of the approaches to Pascagoula and Gulfport, MS; Galveston Bay and Port
Author, TX. Following these hurricanes numerous obstructions were
created by debris from the storm. Shoaling of navigable waters had also
occurred. It was critical that the waterways were surveyed immediately
to allow deep draft vessels to safely enter and leave the port in
support of relief and rebuilding efforts. *(534 characters)*

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

While in the devastated area for nearly two months, the ship and its
survey launches conducted nearly 2400 linear nautical miles of
hydrography and/or side scan sonar operations and approximately 215
vertical water profiles. Additionally, ship personnel interfaced with
other NOAA personnel and local authorities to share data to identify
shoal areas in need of dredging, identify obstructions, and update
nautical charts which expedited the opening of ports. *(458 characters)*

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

The work done by the ship directly allowed the ports of Galveston and
Pascagoula to open to deep draft vessels. This allowed supplies needed
for relief efforts to arrive sooner and in greater quantities.
Additionally, the refinery in the Pascagoula vicinity processes over
300,000 barrels of crude oil a day which made the opening of that port
time critical. *(357 characters)*

**Section 3 - Additional Information**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The work was completed over a two month period including September,
October and November of 2005. The information was used while the ship
was on scene and later for the updating of nautical charts. *(197
characters)*

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The surveying of the approaches to the ports affected by Katrina and
Rita, allowed ship traffic to resume sooner and deep draft vessels to
carry supplies needed in the relief effort. This work is helping the
area to rebuild and aiding in its economic recovery. The ports are vital
to the economic health and vitality of these coastal cities. *(340
characters)*

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The data used to open the ports, specifically the Gulfport inner harbor,
will be used in updating nautical charts. Accurate information of the
harbors and waterways is a key component in the effective planning and
use of the waterfront area. Better development plans will help the
communities to recover quicker and prosper in the future. *(343
characters)*

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

This information will assist the Army Corps of Engineers in identifying
areas that may need to be dredged and obstructions that need to be
removed. *(147 characters)*

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

N/A

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how? **

N/A

**Aircraft Maintenance Branch, AOC**

**NMAO**

**Nomination #20**

Branch of the NOAA Aircraft Operations Center (AOC), Tampa, Florida

Organizational Award

***What is the significance of this accomplishment? (200 characters)***

The Aircraft Maintenance Branch of NOAA's AOC diligently kept all NOAA
Hurricane Hunter Aircraft flying during the most active hurricane season
in history.

**I.** Certificate Text: In recognition of the outstanding individual
and collective effort during the 2005 Hurricane season.

**II**. Program Booklet Text: Not Required

**III.** Justification

**Section 1** **-- Definition of Terms**

AOC \-- Aircraft Operations Center

Hurricane Reconnaissance -- aircraft missions flown into tropical
cyclones used to document current conditions and location of a hurricane
for the purposes of providing warnings to the public. Missions are
tasked by NOAA's National Hurricane Center in Miami, Florida.

Hurricane Research -- aircraft missions into the tropical cyclone
environment for purposes of data collection used in studies to interpret
future track forecast improvements, intensity forecast improvements, or
other information. Missions are conducted in conjunction with NOAA's
Hurricane Research Division in Miami, Florida.

# Section II -- Justification

• What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?

NOAA was slated to fly 297 hours on the G-IV aircraft and 245 hours on
the P-3 aircraft for hurricane reconnaissance and research during the
2005 season -- the actual number of hours flown was 897. Meeting this
demanding flight schedule with safe, reliable and mission capable
aircraft for the most active hurricane season in the history of the
United States in support of NOAA's Hurricane research and reconnaissance
mission proved extremely challenging.

• What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?

The maintenance branch had to support DOUBLE the number of actual hours
and reconnaissance missions into and around tropical cyclones from the
year before. NOAA\'s WP-3D aircraft alone had to fly 673 hours last
fiscal year, which was the most on these aircraft since 1998. NOAA\'s
heavy aircraft are by far the most difficult to maintain and keep
mission ready requiring many man-hours per hour flown.

• What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?

The maintenance branch worked day and night to support the flights. Any
maintenance that could be accomplished in between storms was efficiently
accomplished during the brief down periods to the largest extent
possible since the P-3 Flight Engineers also represent a large portion
of the branch's personnel.

• What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?

The branch performed flawlessly and was instrumental in the Aircraft
Operations Center being recently recognized by both the Director of the
National Weather Service and the Director of the National Hurricane
Center (NHC) for their outstanding support during the most active
hurricane season ever recorded. The command was tasked with 90 low level
fixes of tropical cyclones in 2005 and performed all 90. NOAA\'s G-IV
aircraft was tasked to fly 50 missions, many of them back-to-back
8.5-hour missions, during this past year by NHC and successfully
completed 49 of those, a 98% mission completion rate. The maintenance
branch personnel worked day and night to meet these mission completion
rates and protect the public.

The tangible benefit of this work to the public was the evacuation
warnings given to millions of people minimizing loss of life during an
unprecedented season.

# Section III -- Additional Information

How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?

One hurricane season - June 1 to November 30th, 2005.

What is the short term impact (1-2) years of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

Ensuring that NOAA's reputation for hurricane forecasting remains at the
highest level by providing the aircraft that gather information for
those accurate forecasts.

What is the long term impact (3-5) years of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

By providing the aircraft for research as well as reconnaissance
missions, the maintenance branch has ensured that the future forecast
improvements would continue. It is only through the research flights
that forecasters are able to experiment with new methods for
prognostication. The maintenance branch provides these aircraft.

Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other Federal
agencies? If so, how?

Almost every agency in the federal and state government is impacted by
the flights of these aircraft. Specifically, FEMA, state, county and
local emergency management agencies benefit the most from these flights.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?

No.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?

No.

Previous Awards received by the Aircraft Maintenance Branch:

None

The NOAA Aircraft Operations Center reports to the Office of Marine and
Aviation Operations in Silver Spring, Maryland.

> **CAPT Jon Bailey Group**
>
> **NMAO**
>
> **Nomination #21**

**[Nominees:]{.underline}**

  ----------------------- ------------ ------------------------------ --------
  Full Name of Nominee(s) Line/Staff   Position title/grade           Past
                          Office                                      Awards

  CAPT John Bailey        CPC          Director, O6                   Bronze
                                                                      2000,
                                                                      Gold
                                                                      2002

  Mr. Roger D. Mason      CPC          Deputy Director, GS-15         None

  CDR William Kearse      CPC-2        Chief, Officer Career          Gold
                                       Management Division, O5        2002

  CDR Raymond C. Slagle   CPC-2        Chief, Officer Career          None
                                       Management Division, O5        

  Mrs. Carolyn A. Harris  CPCx2        Chief Resource Management      None
                                       Division, GS-13                

  Ms. Katherine Raymond   CPC-1        Chief, Officer Personnel       None
                                       Management Division, GS-13     

  LCDR Anne Lynch         CPC-2        Chief, Officer Training        None
                                       Branch, O4                     

  LCDR Cecile Daniels     CPC-2        Chief, Officer Assignment      None
                                       Branch, O4                     

  LT Elizabeth            CPC-1        Chief, Medical Administration  None
  Hobson-Powell                        Branch, O3                     

  Mrs. Joann R. Butler    CPCx2        Financial Management           None
                                       Specialist                     

  LTJG Nicole M. Manning  CPC-2        Chief, Officer Recruiting      None
                                       Branch                         

  Mr. Gregory S. Raymond  CPC-1        Chief, NOAA Corps Compensation None
                                       Branch, GS-11                  

  Mrs. Neavaly Touray     CPC-1        Chief, Officer Services        None
                                       Branch, GS-11                  

  Mrs. Sherrita Irby      CPC          Special Assistant, GS-9        None

  Mrs. Carol Holley       CPCx2        Lead Pay Technician, GS-8      None

  Mr. Jerome Thompson     CPCx2        Pay Technician, GS-9           None

  Ms. Barbara M. Smith    CPC-2        Management Assistant, GS-7     None

  Mrs. Yavonda Agbara     CPCx2        Budget Analyst, GS-7           None

  Lisa Sudmann            CPC-1        Human Resources Assistant,     None
                                       GS-5                           
  ----------------------- ------------ ------------------------------ --------

**[Line Office:]{.underline}**

Office of Marine and Aviation Operations

**[Nominator:]{.underline}**

RADM Samuel DeBow, Jr., OMAO

**[Certificate citation:]{.underline}**

For developing and implementing new innovative processes, procedures and
technology resulting in significant improvement to organizational
effectiveness and service provided to its customers.

**[Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Improved organizational efficiencies.

What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?

Under the direction of the Director, CAPT Jon Bailey, the Commissioned
Personnel Center (CPC), the CPC team developed several efficiencies that
have improved the overall service provided to its customers. These
actions were up and beyond their normal jobs.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Enhanced Records Access. CPC staff developed a web based "Virtual CPC",
which allowed all officers to have access to their personnel folders.
Prior to this IT solution, officers had to visit CPC or request a copy
of their officer personnel record or copies had to be mailed to the
officers.

Improved Records Management. CPC staff converted the Annual Review of
Records to an electronic process. This effort reduced the possibility of
original personnel records being lost or destroyed during shipment to
other geographic locations. Additionally, over 120 hours used (3 FTE for
1 week) in packing and unpacking records was redirected to other
projects. Estimated cost savings of \$25K (i.e., travel, hotel rooms,
conference rooms).

Improved Officer Personnel Board (OPB) Process. CPC staff transition
from a paper based officer personnel board process (OPB) (i.e.,
promotion, separation) to an electronic OPB selection process. This new
electronic board process provided enhanced capabilities which resulted
in fewer days being needed to hold boards (i.e., boards were reduced
from 3 days to 1 day; reduced FTE usage by 160 hours for boards).

Improved Access to Policies. CPC staff transitioned personnel policies
from a paper based to an electronic based system. This electronic based
system allowed easier access to policies, quicker updates and reduces
the costs of publishing paper based manuals.

Personnel Allowance List. CPC established a billet list for the NOAA
Corps that aligned with the number of officers authorized by law. This
change resulted in better management of the limited number of officers,
reflected the true needs of NOAA programs, and met Congress' expectation
of the total number of billets reflecting authorized strength.

Officer Evaluation System. During 2005/2006, the NOAA Corps completely
revamped its officer evaluation system. The new Officer Evaluation
Report (OER) provides a better tool for providing feedback to the
officer and the Officer Personnel and Assignment Boards who use this
information when making critical decisions regarding officer promotions,
assignments, and career development decisions.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Allowed for the redistribution of over 280 hours FTE to other projects.
Improved overall service to CPC's customers.

Section 3 - Additional Information (Maximum number of characters for all
six questions in this section cannot exceed 2000.)

How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?

The various projects were completed between October 2005 and May 2006.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?** N/A

Improved efficiencies and stewardship over billets and resources.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?** N/A

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?** N/A

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

N/A

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Improved access to records and quicker response time to customers.

**NOAA Ship *DELAWARE II***

**NMAO**

**Nomination #22**

[Nominee]{.underline}:

The Officers and Crew of the NOAA Ship DELAWARE II

[Line Office]{.underline}:

Office of Marine and Aviation Operations

[Nominators]{.underline}:

Michael Abbott, NOAA Marine and Aviation Operations

Northeast Fisheries Science Center

166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543

Phone: 508-495-2298 Email: Michael.S.Abbott@noaa.gov

Russell Brown, NOAA Fisheries Service

Northeast Fisheries Science Center

166 Water Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543

Phone: 508-495-2380 Email: Russell.Brown@noaa.gov

[Period of Performance]{.underline}:

October 2004 -- April 2006

[Certificate Text]{.underline}:

> For testing and troubleshooting the new fishing gear to be used in the
> NOAA Fisheries Service's Bottom Trawl Survey aboard the FSV Henry B.
> Bigelow

[Justification]{.underline}:

Section 1 -- Definitions:

Northeast Fisheries Science Center Bottom Trawl Survey:

> a multispecies finfish and invertebrate survey conducted utilizing a
> stratified random sampling design and employing standardized research
> fishing gear to ensure compariability among surveys and years

Resource Stakeholders:

> individuals and businesses affected by survey results including
> commercial and recreational fishermen, processing and support
> businesses, scientists and researchers

Headrope Height:

> the distance between the headrope (top of the net) and the sea floor.
> This distance is critical to determining both the volume sampled and
> the catch rate of fish that are distributed near but not in contact
> with the sea floor.

Trawl Doors:

> Large flat or convex metal devices designed to spread the wing ends of
> a bottom or midwater trawl through ground sheer or hydrodynamic
> forcing. Trawl doors tested during this effort ranged from 350 to 800
> kg.

*Section 2 -- Award Justification:*

***What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?***

The spring (1968 -- present) and autumn (1963 -- present) bottom trawl
surveys conducted by the NOAA Fisheries Service's Northeast Fisheries
Science Center (NEFSC) are the longest running continuous time series of
research vessel sampling of broad scale finfish and marine organism
invertebrate communities in the world. The extensive time series of data
has allowed scientists to document: the dramatic collapse of many fish
stocks in response to intense harvesting by distant water fleets in the
1960's; the dramatic collapse and subsequent recovery of several
important fish stocks including Atlantic herring and haddock on Georges
Bank; and shifts in the distribution of finfish and invertebrates and
detection of large year classes (cohorts). With the introduction of the
FSV Henry B. Bigelow and the expected retirement of the RV Albatross IV,
it was necessary to both shift research platforms and adopt new
scientific fishing gear that could be effectively utilized on the
Bigelow. New fishing gear was designed by an Advisory Panel of
scientific and resource stakeholders including commercial fishermen.

***What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?***

The officers and crew of the RV Delaware II faced a daunting set of
challenges including testing gear with multiple sets of trawl doors,
fishing gear that is designed to be utilized on a significantly larger
vessel and working cooperatively with commercial fishery stakeholders
and NEFSC Scientists to optimize gear performance.

***What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?***

The NOAA Ship Delaware II completed 7 cruises over a period of 19 months
testing the new gear with many gear and rigging modifications, scope and
speed trials, changes in personnel, and flexibility of scheduling. The
vessel officers and crew responded by coordinating gear preparation and
rigging, determining innovative and safe approaches for gear deployment
and retrieval and assisting in troubleshooting of electronic and
acoustic sensors used to log and evaluate gear performance.

***What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?***

The results of this project are a gear design that is endorsed by the
Mid-Atlantic and New England Trawl Survey Advisory Panel, a diverse
group of scientific and industry stakeholders. The information gained
from future surveys will be used in analyses of ecosystem process
variability and contribute to the NOAA Mission Goal to *\"Protect,
restore and manage the use of coastal and ocean resources through an
ecosystem approach to management.\"*

*Section 3 -- Additional Information:*

***How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?***

The officers and crew of the RV Delaware II worked with scientists from
the Northeast Fisheries Science Center during 7 separate cruises between
October 2004 and April 2006 to adaptively modify and testing the
proposed survey fishing gear.

***What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?***

Extensive testing of gear and evaluation of results by Trawl Survey
Advisory Panel members has resulted in significant short term benefits
including stronger relationships with stakeholders and increased
stakeholder confidence in scientific operations on NOAA research
vessels.

***What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment of the
accomplishment on the bureau and/or Department's mission?***

To be honest, labeling long-term impacts in terms of 3-5 years is
extremely short sighted (by an order of magnitude) relative to the NOAA
mission of understanding ecosystems and managing resources on an
ecosystem basis. The impacts of effective survey gear design are
long-term and broad scale since these surveys are expected to be
conducted on an annual basis for the next two to four decades. The
scientific fishing gear from previous bottom trawl surveys was held
relatively constant for a period of 43 years.

***Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?***

These bottom trawl surveys serve as a primary platform for the
collection of biological and oceanographic samples on the Northwest
Atlantic continental shelf. Over the past 43 years, the surveys have
included participation of individuals from 170 different federal, state
and international agencies and universities. NEFSC bottom trawl surveys
support an average of 40 external sample requests from other federal,
state and international agencies and universities per survey.

***Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?***

The new fishing gear is design for more consistent performance of a
variety of habitats and under a range of sea state conditions. Initial
testing on the RV Delaware II indicates that the gear has consistent
bottom contact, a significantly higher head rope height, and is able to
effectively sample a significantly broader range of habitats and biota.

***Did the accomplishment results in a major advancement in
non**-**scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
support? If so, how?***

By troubleshooting issues of gear changes on the NOAA Ship Delaware II,
the transition to the NOAA Ship Henry B. Bigelow will be much smoother
and stakeholder confidence in NOAA fisheries surveying operations will
be enhanced. This effort positions the NOAA Ship Henry B. Bigelow is to
be the fleet standard of fishery survey vessels on the Atlantic coast.

**NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE NOMINATIONS**

**Steven Bograd**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #23**

**Nominee**

  ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ------------
  First and Last     **NOAA Fisheries     Position Title &    Past Awards
  Name, Ph.D.(if     Service**            Grade or Pay Band   
  appropriate)                                                

  Steven Bograd,     Southwest Fisheries  Supervisory         \`
  Ph.D.              Science Center       Research            
                                          Oceanographer       
                                          ZP-4-1              
  ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ------------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

As the complex and poorly understood linkages between climate
variability and marine ecosystem health become more comprehendible, NOAA
is expanding its ability to incorporate climate-related information into
its fisheries management decisions.

**Certificate**

For superior contributions in scientific research and leadership with
NOAA and its partners in understanding the linkages between climate
variability and marine ecosystem health.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The scientific community recognizes that ecosystem structure and
productivity are influenced by the environment, and may be altered by
future climate variability, but lack knowledge of the processes. Dr.
Bograd's research and leadership efforts are instrumental in creating an
understanding of the scientific basis for how climate variability
impacts marine ecosystems.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Dr, Bograd's research and scientific leadership efforts specifically
address both the NOAA Ecosystem and Climate Goals, and strengthen the
links between them. Trends and fluctuations observed in populations of
living marine resources frequently are attributable to impacts from
physical processes in the marine ecosystem environments. Dr. Bograd's
efforts are expanding NOAA's ability to incorporate climate-related
information in NOAA's fisheries management decisions.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

As a project leader in the Tagging of Pacific Pelagics (TOPP), one
component of the Census of Marine Life, Dr. Bograd studies the migration
patterns of large open-ocean animals and the oceanographic factors
controlling these patterns. The TOPP program is a partnership between
scientists from NOAA, academia, and foreign nations to integrate animal
tracking data collection efforts with oceanographic observations to map
the habitat of these animals and to understand how climate variability
induced changes to their habitat impacts these animals.

Dr. Bograd's studies of the diverse biota in upwelling waters in the
California Current, the seasonal and inter-annual migrations of the
transition zone chlorophyll front in the Current, and oceanographic
characteristics of biological hot spots in the North Pacific are helping
to delineate the impacts of climate variability, often evidenced in the
marine water column, on marine ecosystems of fishery stocks.

Through his leadership roles in the Northeast Pacific Program of the
U.S. component of Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics; components of the
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System for the west coast; and the
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission's Small Pelagics and Climate
Change Working Group on the "Use of Environmental Indices in Management
of Pelagic Fish Population," Dr. Bograd's efforts are adding to the body
of knowledge on the impacts of climate change on marine populations.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Dr. Bograd's scientific insights were instrumental in the ability of the
NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center to identify leading indicators
of environmental variability for incorporation into assessments of
fishery stocks. Further, his research on large-scale variability of
recurring temperature changes off the west coast of the U.S. indicated
associated impacts on the recruitment of groundfish. His research and
scientific leadership are advancing the marine science community,
enhancing NOAA's international scientific partnerships, and improving
NOAA's ability to make more informed decisions for protecting marine
resources and the associated ecosystems.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Dr. Bograd's scientific research and leadership activities span his
entire five-year tenure with NOAA.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

In the short-term, the results of Dr. Bograd's research promote
increased recognition of the importance of climate and environmental
variability to marine ecosystems.

**\\What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

In the long-term, Dr. Bograd's scientific leadership will contribute to
establishing ecosystem-based management strategies to ensure the
long-term health of living marine populations.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

No.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or**

**automation? If so, how?**

Understanding of the linkages between climate variability and marine
ecosystem health is in its infancy. Dr. Bograd's research and scientific
leadership efforts in these areas are adding to the knowledge base as
well as expanding NOAA's ability to incorporate climate-related
information in NOAA's fisheries management decisions.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

No.

**Steven Fransen**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #24**

**[Nominee]{.underline}**

  --------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------
  First and Last  **NOAA Fisheries      Position Title &      Past Awards
  Name, Ph.D.(if  Service**             Grade or Pay Band     
  appropriate)                                                

  Steven Fransen  Northwest Regional    Fish Biologist        
                  Office                ZP-482-III            
  --------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

Avoiding years of potential litigation, the Baker Settlement Agreement
facilitates providing continuous hydropower to residents of the Puget
Sound region while significantly improving habitat conditions for
endangered salmon in and along the River.

**Certificate Text**

For exceptional leadership in contentious negotiations for renewing a
hydropower license with provisions to enhance passage of salmon runs in
the Baker River, Washington.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The 175-megawatt Baker River Project is Puget Sound Energy's largest
hydropower facility, and was last issued a federal license in 1956.
Public interest in the process for its re-licensing was immense and
diverse. Peaking operations were common at the project that consists of
two high head dams with storage reservoirs to provide nearly total
hydraulic control of the sub-basin. Obstructed upstream and downstream
passage, with downstream being the most problematic, was the primary
impact to fisheries. Number range CHAPTERIn January 2001, Washington
Trout, American Rivers, and others filed a 60 day notice against Puget
Sound Energy. The suit was related to an incident in November 2000, when
a shut off of water releases from Lower Baker dam caused a dramatic drop
in river levels in the lower Skagit River. The change in river level
stranded numerous salmon and exposed juvenile salmon.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Prior to Mr. Fransen's efforts, more than 400 separate meetings,
attended by over100 representatives from 24 interested parties, and
completion of 76 major studies during the previous four years had
culminated in exceedingly contentious conditions.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Mr. Fransen negotiated with interested parties to craft conditions for a
new hydropower license that would align with other Federal and state
resource interests; fulfill Tribal trust responsibilities; accommodate
municipal and county government concerns as well as those of private
interests and conservation groups; and be realistically achievable for
the licensee. Using ingenuity to identify workable approaches while
maintaining a collegial manner, he coordinated terms that were agreeable
to all.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Mr. Fransen's diplomatic skills and excellent understanding of the
conflicting issues not only facilitated concurrence on the terms for
re-licensing, but also enabled inclusion of provisions that
significantly improve habitat conditions for endangered salmon in and
along the River. Signed in November 2004, the Settlement Agreement was
hailed by the president and CEO of Puget Sound Energy as showing "that
people can find common ground for the common good even when they hold
widely differing interests and objectives at the outset."

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

For 12 months Mr. Fransen negotiated with interested parties to identify
mutually agreeable conditions for re-licensing the hydropower facilities
on the Baker River in Washington. The Baker Settlement Agreement was
signed in November 2004.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Successful completion of the Settlement Agreement avoided years of
litigation among the parties and enabled timely implementation of
important resource protections for the valuable fisheries.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Under the agreement, Puget Sound Energy is committing future investments
of more than \$360 million for protection, mitigation and improvement
measures covering fish, wildlife, recreation and flood management over
the 45-year license period. The settlement enhances access to 36 miles
of habitat upstream of the dams and improves spawning conditions in the
30 miles downstream of the dams for Chinook salmon, listed under the
Endangered Species Act. New powerhouse modifications are included to
provide adequate water levels for reasonably safe passage for salmon up
and down the Baker River. Further, construction of new hatchery
facilities, mandated in the Settlement, will improve and supplement an
existing fish culture program.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Signatories to this Agreement included not only NOAA and Puget Sound
Energy, but also the National Park Service, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service as well as other federal, state, and local
agencies, private interests, conservation groups, and Tribes.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Completion of Baker Settlement Agreement facilitates providing
continuous hydropower to the residents of the Puget Sound region while
significantly improving habitat conditions for endangered salmon in and
along the River.

**Lance Garrison**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #25**

**Nominee**

  ------------------ ---------------------------- --------------- --------
  First and Last     NOAA Fisheries Service       Position Title  Past
  Name, Ph.D.(if                                  & Grade or Pay  Awards
  appropriate)                                    Band            

  Lance Garrison,    Southeast Fisheries Science  Research        None
  Ph.D.              Center                       Fishery         
                                                  Biologist GS-13 
  ------------------ ---------------------------- --------------- --------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

NOAA is developing and implementing effective marine mammal conservation
measures that minimize impacts to mariners, fishermen, and the nation's
economy as a result of Dr. Garrison's research.

**Certificate Text**

For sustained and tireless efforts to produce high quality scientific
analyses, thus furthering critical marine mammal conservation goals for
NOAA.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

NOAA is charged with implementing protections afforded living marine
resources by the mandates of the Endangered Species Act and the Marine
Mammal Protection Act. Doing so requires NOAA scientists to identify,
evaluate, and attempt to minimize human impacts on protected marine
species. Harmful human actions include accidental capture in fishing
gear and collisions with ships. Developing and implementing policy and
regulations to minimize these harmful actions requires an underpinning
of sound scientific data.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Right whales are among the most endangered species in the world and are
highly vulnerable to ship collisions; and calves, or baby whales, are
the most susceptible. Reducing serious injuries and deaths among Right
whales would allow more of these rare marine mammals to reach maturity
and reproduce. Improving the mortality for right whales is essential for
their population to eventually reach sustainable levels.

Pilot whales and Risso's Dolphins are frequently accidental catches in
the pelagic longline fishery. Changes to fishing practices and gear are
crucial if NOAA is to achieve the Marine Mammal Protection Act goal of
reducing the accidental catch of marine mammals to insignificant levels
that approach the zero rate. Previously, little scientific data existed
on the pilot whale/Risso's dolphin stock structure and the nature of
their interactions in the pelagic longline fishery.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The North Atlantic Right whale's known range includes winter calving and
nursery areas in coastal waters off the southeastern U.S. Dr. Garrison
conducted risk assessments of shipping lanes in three southeastern U.S.
ports in the Right whale's calving area. He also used a general additive
model to analyze the relative contribution of habitat features such as
water temperature and bathymetry to Right whale mother/calf
distribution.

In support of the efforts of the multi-stakeholder Pelagic Longline Take
Reduction Team (PLTRT) to develop management measures, Dr. Garrison
evaluated multiple factors associated with the accidental catch of pilot
whales and Risso's dolphins in that fishery. He developed a predictive
model to identify what changes in fishing practices and gear might help
reduce accidental catches. Dr. Garrison analyzed the effects of changing
hook shape, hook size, presence or absence of light sticks, bait type,
hook depth, mainline length, number of hooks, set duration, soak
duration, and haul duration on interaction rates of pilot whales and
Risso's dolphins.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

NOAA will use the results of Dr. Garrison's analyses on ship collisions
with Right whales to identify shipping lanes on its nautical charts that
are less risky to right whales. NOAA's marine resource managers are
using his analyses of temperature and bathymetry with Right whale
mother/calf distribution in southeastern coastal waters to assess
potential critical habitat areas for these marine mammals.

The results of Dr. Garrison's predictive model for pilot whales and
Risso's dolphins formed the basis of management measures recommended by
the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Team to achieve the Marine Mammal
Protection Act goal of reducing accidental catch of marine mammals to
almost zero.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Dr. Garrison's predictive modeling and risk assessments to further the
objectives of marine mammal conservation were produced during the last
four years.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the**

**Department's mission?**

Results from Dr. Garrison's key analytical products enable NOAA to
implement marine mammal conservation measures that are not overly
burdensome to mariners and fishermen.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the**

**Department's mission?**

Incorporation of the results of Dr. Garrison's rigorous analyses into
NOAA's marine mammal conservation measures will continue to instill
public confidence in NOAA's approach, and ensure that marine resource
managers use the best information to implement effective measures with
minimum associated impacts on the nation's economy.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Dr. Garrison's excellent communication skills in explaining results from
his rigorous scientific analyses to stakeholders and managers enable
NOAA to develop and implement effective marine mammal conservation
measures that minimize impacts to mariners, fishermen, and the nation's
economy.

**Loretta O'Brien**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #26**

Nominee

+---------------+---------------------------+----------------+--------+
| First and     | **NOAA Fisheries          | Position Title | Past   |
| Last Name,    | Service**                 | & Grade or Pay | Awards |
| Ph.D.(if      |                           | Band           |        |
| appropriate)  |                           |                |        |
+---------------+---------------------------+----------------+--------+
| Loretta       | Northeast Fisheries       | Research       | None   |
| O'Brien       | Science Center            | Fishery        |        |
|               |                           |                |        |
|               |                           | Biologist      |        |
|               |                           |                |        |
|               |                           | Pay Band ZP IV |        |
+---------------+---------------------------+----------------+--------+

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

More effective fishery management and improved stock conditions for
Atlantic cod and haddock on Georges Bank are possible due to increased
accuracy of assessments of the reproductive potential for specific
quantities of spawning stock biomass.

**Certificate Text**

For distinguished research on the reproductive potential of finfish,
specifically the effects of stock demographics and environmental
factors.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act requires
NOAA to develop and implement conservation and management measures to
restore exploited stocks to sustainable levels for the benefit of the
nation and its economy. These measures are required to be based on
rigorous scientific data.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Finfish stocks in the waters of the Northwestern Atlantic are among
those considered exploited and require management measures to return
their populations to sustainable levels. Current management of these
stocks involves evaluation of both fishing mortality and biomass-based
biological reference points. Spawning stock biomass, one such biological
reference point, is a common measure to evaluate reproductive capability
to generate increased populations. The reproductive potential of a given
quantity of spawning biomass, however, may vary according to various
factors. For example, the reproductive success of fish spawning for the
first time is lower than that for repeat spawning fish. Ms. O'Brien's
goal was to identify and quantify those factors associated with the
reproductive potential of finfish in the Northwestern Atlantic.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Collaborating with the Working Group on Reproductive Potential, under
the auspices of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, Ms.
O'Brien compiled a North Atlantic-wide atlas of existing data and
analyses correlated with measures of reproductive potential such as egg
and larval production, gonadosomatic and hepatosomatic indices, as well
as measures of stock demographics such as growth and age structure. She
then developed a set of life history and general additive models that
quantified the role of these and other environmental factors in
determining an overall measure of the reproductive potential of a stock.
Further, working with a team under the auspices of the International
Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Ms. O'Brien investigated the
role of reaction norms in explaining the onset of age and size maturity
of Atlantic cod and haddock of Georges Bank.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Ms. O'Brien's results enable more accurate assessments of the
reproductive potential for specific quantities of spawning finfish stock
biomass, thereby facilitating more effective fishery management and
improved stock conditions over the long term. For example, her research
indicated the importance of maintaining multiple age groups in the
stocks of Atlantic cod and haddock on Georges Bank in order to achieve
sustainable populations.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Ms. O'Brien's research began in 1999 and is on-going.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The results of Ms. O'Brien's research on impacts of the onset of age and
size maturity on the reproductive capability of spawning biomass of
Atlantic cod and haddock on Georges Bank will be incorporated in
near-term fishery management measures to promote maintaining multiple
age groups for these stocks.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Ms. O'Brien's results will be applied to other exploited fish stocks to
create more effective fishery management measures to promote sustainable
populations.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Ms. O'Brien's research enables more accurate assessments of the
reproductive potential for specific quantities of spawning finfish stock
biomass, thereby facilitating more effective fishery management measures
and improved stock conditions over the long term.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

John Catena/Eric Hutchins

NMFS

Nomination #27

(Originally submitted as Silver; NIAB recommended resubmission as
Bronze)

**Nominees**

John G. Catena

NOAA Fisheries Service, Office of Habitat Conservation

Northeast Regional Supervisor, Band IV

Silver Medal (2000), Bronze (2000), General Counsel\'s Award (1998)

Eric Hutchins

NOAA Fisheries Service, Office of Habitat Conservation

Fisheries Biologist, Band IV

Silver Medal (2000), Administrator's (2004)

**Category:** Leadership

**Nominator:** William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance:**

Focusing limited resources on the highest priority projects, the Gulf of
Maine Habitat Restoration Strategy is increasing restored habitat
acreage and stream miles in the region via greater cooperation between
the U.S. and Canada.

**Certificate Text:**

For spearheading collaborative relationships with United States and
Canadian partners to conceive, complete, and implement the Gulf of Maine
Habitat Restoration Strategy.

**Definitions:** The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment
(GOMC) is a collaboration between public and private entities around the
Gulf of Maine that was established to enhance, improve, and protect the
estuarine, coastal, and marine resources of the Gulf. In 1989, the
Governors of Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, and the Premiers
of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia passed a resolution stating that each
jurisdiction is committed to the Council\'s mission "to maintain and
enhance environmental quality in the Gulf of Maine (GOM) and to allow
for sustainable resource use by existing and future generations." NOAA's
Fisheries Service is a voting member of the Council.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Increased commercial and residential development, non-point source
pollution, and invasive plants are among factors threatening salt
marshes, seagrass beds, and riverine habitats that provide productive
and diverse habitat for finfish and shellfish in the Gulf of Maine. This
Team's leadership was instrumental in developing an approach to involve
interested parties, with competing interests, to work together to
identify and restore coastal habitats. Their efforts are in support of
NOAA's stewardship mission to promote an ecosystem-based approach to
conserving and managing our Nation's coastal and marine resources.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Numerous federal, provincial, state, and local governments, tribal
groups, university scientists, and non profit organizations were
conducting separate and unrelated restoration efforts along both the
Canadian and U.S. coastal areas of the Gulf of Maine. Recognizing that
these disjointed efforts were not effectively expanding usable habitat,
the Team successfully advocated the creation of the Habitat Restoration
Committee under the auspices of the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine
Environment.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Guiding the efforts of the Committee, the Team collaborated with
federal, provincial, state, and local governments, tribal groups,
university scientists, and non-profit organizations, such as Ducks
Unlimited and American Rivers, to develop a unified international
approach to regional habitat restoration. Initial steps included
identifying planned habitat restoration projects along the shores of
Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia as
well as potential sources of funding. Culminating in the Gulf of Maine
Habitat Restoration Strategy, the Committee prioritized restoration
projects to focus limited resources on those of greatest importance to
improving the health of the entire Gulf of Maine ecosystem while meeting
individual state and provincial needs. Subsequently, the Team directed
dozens of habitat restoration projects; and developed and implemented
Gulf-wide monitoring for salt marsh restoration projects.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

An estimated 50 habitat restoration projects are completed or underway
on both sides of the Gulf of Maine that address priority habitats
outlined in the Strategy. These projects are restoring water flow to
tidally restricted salt marshes, improving fish passage, and managing
invasive species. Further, the Team's efforts increased the transfer of
technology and information between U.S. and Canadian restoration
practitioners.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The Strategy was developed over the course of two years, adopted by the
Gulf of Maine Council on June 14, 2004, and publicly released at the
Gulf of Maine Summit in October, 2004 in St. Andrews, New Brunswick.
On-the-ground implementation of the strategy is an on-going effort.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

NOAA and its restoration partners are beginning to see a noticeable
increase in the quantity and quality of habitat restoration projects in
the region. The strategy helps NOAA to allocate its scarce funds to the
region's highest priority projects and provides a means to evaluate the
success of these funding efforts.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishments on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The Strategy will facilitate an even greater number and quality of
habitat restoration projects in the next 3-5 years. As more projects are
initiated, secondary benefits, such as enhanced protection and
management of NOAA trust resources, improved ocean literacy, and an
informed international leadership, will accrue.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The Strategy development was led by the Habitat Restoration Committee,
which consists of representatives from every level of state, provincial
and federal governmental in both the U.S. and Canada. In addition, many
non-profit organizations, including Ducks Unlimited, American Rivers,
and Trout Unlimited, participated in the process and are formal members
of the committee. These partners are working to implement the
recommendations in the Strategy.

**Did the accomplishments result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation?**

The Strategy is facilitating new restoration techniques and scientific
monitoring of Gulf of Maine restoration projects. The Restoration
Committee is now working to develop a standardized set of river
restoration monitoring protocols to ensure that quality science is
incorporated into the growing number of habitat restoration projects.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement of non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

The adoption of the restoration strategy provided the public,
municipalities, non-governmental organizations, academics, and other
citizen groups a common understanding of the region's priority habitats
and serves as an impetus to actively engage citizens in restoration
activities.

**Natalie Cosentino-Manning/Brian Mulvey**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #28**

**Nominees**

Natalie Cosentino-Manning

NOAA Fisheries Service

Office of Habitat Conservation

NOAA Restoration Center

Marine Restoration Specialist F/HC3

ZP-0401-III

Past Awards - None

Brian Mulvey

NOAA Fisheries Service

Southwest Regional Office

Fishery Management Specialist F/SWO22

ZP-0480-III

Past Awards - None

**Nominator:** William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

Newly planted eelgrass and native oyster beds are restoring estuarine
habitat for recreational and commercial fisheries in San Francisco Bay,
the largest and most economically important estuary on the U.S. Pacific
coast.

**Certificate Text**

For leading research and implementation of eelgrass and native oyster
bed restoration programs that are improving habitat for recreational and
commercial fisheries in San Francisco Bay.

**Definitions:**

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The previous existence of native eelgrass and oyster beds and their
beneficial ecosystem roles in

San Francisco Bay, the largest and most economically important estuary
on the U.S. Pacific coast, were not well known. With the decline of
these habitats in the Bay, the feeding, sheltering, and nursery
functions for native fisheries in Bay waters also were severely
deteriorated. In support of NOAA's environmental stewardship goal, the
Team led efforts to better understand the roles of these native habitats
and create a clear strategy for their restoration.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Continued and increasing pressures from development and operations of
ports, marinas, and other marine transportation industries, as well as
increased shoreline development along the Bay created a growing need for
options to offset impacts from these activities. The lack of scientific
data on the eelgrass and oyster habitats prevented their inclusion in
mitigation requirements to compensate for the resulting negative impacts
to the Bay ecosystem.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Collaborating with 33 federal, state, local, academic, and
non-governmental scientists, the Team initiated a program to research
the decline of native eelgrass and oysters in San Francisco Bay and
develop effective restoration strategies. The Team sponsored workshops
with other federal, state and local agencies around the Bay to promote
dissemination of the new information. Partnering with the Save the San
Francisco Bay Association, the Team utilized local community groups to
demonstrate the feasibility of restoring native oyster and eelgrass
habitats.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

These habitat restoration projects demonstrated that the presence of
filter-feeding oysters improves the clarity of the estuarine waters,
which in turn, promotes the growth of eelgrass beds.

As feeding, sheltering, and nursery capabilities provided by the
eelgrass and native oyster beds return to the Bay, so do native fish and
invertebrates. Sport fishermen again are enjoying the challenge of
catching striped bass, California halibut, leopard shark, sturgeon, and
salmon in season. Environmental resource managers are using the newly
acquired knowledge to create options that offset unavoidable adverse
impacts from new development projects. Further, a network of partners in
the San Francisco Bay area have contributed over \$500,000, to date, to
assist in additional research and restoration of these habitats.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

These efforts began in 2000, with accomplishments continuing through
2006.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

By initiating efforts to restore native eelgrass and oyster habitats in
the Bay, NOAA is recognized by the local community as a new leader in
improving the San Francisco Bay ecosystem.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Extensive public interest and participation in these activities is
promoting a long-term commitment to the stewardship of the San Francisco
Bay estuarine habitats. The obvious successes of the native eelgrass and
oyster restoration program spurred a new effort, the San Francisco Bay
Subtidal Habitat Goals Project that will document, protect, restore and
manage other subtidal habitats. This project, also led by NOAA
representatives, is expected to be completed on Earth Day 2008.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Departments or other
federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes. The newly acquired knowledge on the status eelgrass and oysters in
San Francisco Bay along with the development of a new technique to
restore eelgrass is providing improved compensatory mitigation options
for federal, state, and local agencies in the Bay area.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. As a result of these efforts, a new technique using eelgrass seeds
for restoration is being refined for San Francisco Bay. This seed buoy
technique is easy to use; may be implemented by multiple agencies and
non-profit community groups; and also may save time and money.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Yes. Permit and consultation processes for new development activities
are facilitated by the inclusion of native eelgrass and oyster habitats
in options to offset negative ecosystem impacts when adverse impacts are
unavoidable. Also, the coordinated efforts among participating agencies
on these Bay habitats are providing an efficient means to initiate new
restoration projects and improve the potential for success.

**Richard Hartman/Lawrence Haase**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #29**

Nominee

  ----------------- -------------------- ----------------- ---------------
  First and Last    **NOAA Fisheries     Position Title &  Past Awards
  Name              Service**            Grade or Pay Band 

  Richard Hartman   Southeast Region,    Fish Biologist    Bronze Medal
                    Habitat Conservation GS-13             2005
                    Division                               

  Lawrence Haase    Southeast Region,    Fish Biologist    
                    Habitat Conservation GS-12             
                    Division                               
  ----------------- -------------------- ----------------- ---------------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

More efficient review of projects and increased available funding to
mitigate fishery habitat impacts from permitted wetland development
activities in Louisiana are accruing from the consistent use of a
mitigation fee of \$25,409 for construction of one acre of wetland
habitat.

**Certificate Text**

For creating wetland value estimates for use as mitigation fees in
conjunction with compensatory mitigation required by the Coastal
Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Projects such as those for construction, dredging, and filling within
wetland areas in Louisiana must satisfy requirements to mitigate adverse
impacts to wetlands mandated by the provisions of the Coastal Wetlands
Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act. While Louisiana's 3.5 million
acres of coastal wetlands represent about 40 percent of the coastal
marshes in the continental U.S., Louisiana also experiences about 80
percent of the nation's annual coastal wetland losses. These wetlands
not only protect more developed areas from storms, they provide
essential habitat for fishery resources. Louisiana ranks second only to
Alaska in total pounds of commercial fish and shellfish landed annually.
Consequently, preserving these wetlands is crucial to the nation as well
as to Louisiana.

Once adverse impacts from specific projects are either avoided or
minimized to the maximum extent practicable, the NOAA Fisheries Service
usually seeks in-kind and in-place compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable impacts to marine and estuarine fishery habitat. Where this
is not possible or desirable, offsite habitat compensation is the only
reasonable option for compensating for habitat loss and degradation.
This may consist of the purchase of mitigation bank credits, stand-alone
or project-specific habitat restoration or creation projects, or
financial contributions to mitigation funding pools. Costs to remedy
adverse impacts of small-scale projects can be very expensive relative
to the small acreage typically created. To address these issues,
mitigation fess are assessed and added to other monies managed by the
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

In 2001, representatives from the NOAA Fisheries Service evaluated costs
for construction of coastal restoration projects and demonstrated a
reasonable habitat replacement value of \$18,000 per acre. In 2004, the
Team re-assessed the fee to determine what average value would fairly
compensate for the value of the lost wetland habitats.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The Team analyzed marsh creation projects constructed under the auspices
of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act,
Louisiana's Dedicated Dredging Program, NOAA's Community-Based
Restoration Program, and stand-alone mitigation construction efforts.
Factors analyzed included: 1) costs associated with marsh planting and
monitoring of restored or created habitats, 2) "functional
in-equivalency" of created areas as newly created habitats often possess
lower ecological values than long-established ones, and 3) planning,
administration and oversight of marsh creation projects. Documenting
their results in a report, the Team ensured scientific peer view of
their conclusions within and outside of NOAA.

Based on their analyses and external review of their work, it was agreed
that the amount needed to construct one acre of wetland habitat should
be set at \$25,409. In response to the Team's efforts, the Louisiana
Department of Natural Resources and the New Orleans District to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers sought broad public comment on the proposed fee
to mitigate for small project impacts. After evaluating public comments,
these regulatory agencies adopted the new valuation and are applying it
to smaller coastal development proposals when they determine that the
application of project specific habitat compensation would be
ineffective or excessively expensive.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Based on the Team's analyses, external review and public comments, the
Team's value of \$25,409 to construct one acre of wetland habitat was
adopted by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and the New
Orleans District to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for future
mitigation fees. Routinely and consistently applying this fee will
facilitate project review activities and greatly increase funding
available to mitigate fishery habitat impacts from permitted wetland
development activities in Louisiana.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The Team began the effort in 2004 and completed it in 2005.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Routinely applying the increased fee of 25,409 for construction of one
acre of wetland habitat will facilitate project review activities and
greatly increase funding available to mitigate fishery habitat impacts
from permitted wetland development activities in Louisiana.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Ultimately, the adoption of the Team's revised fee requirements by state
and federal regulatory agencies will create a significant long-term
benefit to habitat conservation/mitigation efforts in coastal Louisiana.
While inflation and technology will require a periodic review of habitat
replacement costs, the Team's efforts establish a strong basis from
which future mitigation cost evaluations can be updated.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The Team's value of \$25,409 to construct one acre of wetland habitat
was adopted by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and the New
Orleans District to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for future
mitigation fees.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Acceptance of the increased mitigation fee by all affected parties
demonstrates that this approach creates a balance between responsible
and needed coastal development activities and the conservation of
essential wetland habitats that support economically important
fisheries.

**Kimberly Amendola Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #30**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**[Nominees]{.underline}**

**Kimberly Amendola**

NMFS, SERO

GS-1001-12

Communications Specialist

Past Awards: none

**Connie Barclay**

NOAA NMFS

Director, NOAA Fisheries Service Public Affairs

GS 14/1035 series

**Laura Engleby**

NMFS, SERO

Fishery Management Specialist

GS480-12

Past Awards: Bronze award 2005

**Amy Holman**

Program Analyst

NOS/Office of Response and Restoration

GS-343-13

Previous Awards: Administrator's Award 2004

**Blair Mase-Guthrie**

Fishery Biologist

NMFS-Southeast Fisheries Science Center

GS-482-8

Previous Awards: Bronze Award 2005

**Keith Mullin, Ph.D.**

Research Fishery Biologist

NMFS-Southeast Fisheries Science Center

ZP-0482-IV

Previous Awards: None

**Jason Rolfe**

Physical Scientist

NOS/Office of Response and Restoration

GS-1301-12

Previous Awards: None

**Patricia Rosel, Ph.D.**

Research Geneticist

NMFS-Southeast Fisheries Science Center

GS-0440-13

Previous Awards: Administrators Award 2003

**Teresa K. Rowles, D.V.M., Ph.D.**

Fishery Biologist and Chief Veterinarian

NMFS-Office of Protected Resources

ZP-482-IV

Previous Awards: Silver Medal 2003

> Bronze Medal 2005
>
> Bronze Medal 2003
>
> Bronze Medal 2002

**Trevor Spradlin**

Fishery Biologist

NMFS-Office of Protected Resources

ZP-482-III

Past Awards: Bronze award 2005

Bronze award 2001

**[Significance of the Accomplishment]{.underline}**

During responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Team's leadership
enabled rescues of several imperiled captive and wild marine mammals,
while coordinating intense media interest in the rescues.

**[Certificate Text]{.underline}**

For successful rescues of captive and wild marine mammals displaced and
injured during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and associated media reports.

**[Program Booklet Text]{.underline}**

In the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Team demonstrated
skill in leading the rescues of captive-raised and wild marine mammals
in hazardous conditions, as well as in coordinating intense media
interest in the rescues. When an aquarium facility was destroyed in
Mississippi, 8 dolphins and 14 sea lions, not accustomed to independent
living, were washed out to sea. Further, 10 wild dolphins were stranded
inland by storm surge. All marine mammals were successfully captured,
wild dolphins returned to sea, and captive-reared marine mammals
returned to alternative aquaria.

**[Section 2 - Definitions]{.underline}**

USDA -- APHIS= United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service

**[Section 3 -- Challenge-Context-Action-Result]{.underline}**

1.  **What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

> The challenge was to rescue captive and wild marine mammals that were
> displaced by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita without further endangerment
> of human or animal safety. These actions support NOAA's goal to
> observe, protect, and manage the nation's marine resources to promote
> environmental stewardship.

2.  **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> The rescue efforts were compounded by conflicting reports about marine
> mammals needing assistance and by well-meaning, but often
> ill-conceived willingness, of many parties to assist marine mammals
> during a crisis.

3.  **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> These individuals quickly organized into a multi-disciplinary team to
> address many different aspects of the rescue efforts. Communication
> was a key activity, ensuring that information was received,
> interpreted, and transmitted efficiently and effectively among all
> parties involved in, or interested in, the rescue efforts and the
> status of the affected marine mammals. The Team's scientific expertise
> enabled them to interpret often conflicting information and provide
> clear, consistent instructions to rescue teams and others. The Team
> coordinated the simultaneous activity of several rescue teams acting
> over a broad area and facilitated cooperation among several NOAA
> programs, USDA-APHIS, the U.S. Navy, and independent public display
> facilities. The Team also provided clear, consistent messages to news
> media and to senior government officials in a timely manner.

4.  **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

> In the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Team successfully
> rescued captive-reared marine mammals (8 dolphins and 14 sea lions)
> washed out to sea when an aquarium was destroyed, and 10 wild dolphins
> that were washed ashore by storm surge. The Team also fielded over 200
> calls from local, national and international media, thereby increasing
> public awareness of NOAA\'s stewardship responsibility for living
> marine resources.

**[Section 4 -- Additional Information]{.underline}**

1.  **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?**

> The rescues post-Hurricane Katrina occurred over 6 months. After
> Hurricane Rita, rescues occurred over a 2-week period.
>
> **When was the accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**
>
> The rescues were initiated within 24 hours of Hurricane Katrina with
> the last rescue post-Katrina on March 13, 2006, and last rescue
> post-Rita on October 21, 2005.

2.  **What is the short-term impact (1--2 years) of the accomplishment
    on NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

> The short term impact was the successful rescue of 10 wild bottlenose
> dolphins, protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) for
> which NOAA is responsible. The Team also established a positive
> relationship with the media, which led to several long term stories on
> Discovery Channel and National Geographic.

3.  **What is the long-term impact (3--5 years) of the accomplishment on
    NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

> Long-term positive impacts include: (1) the wild dolphins that were
> displaced by the storm surge were returned to their home waters and
> will continue as members of the local wild dolphin population, and (2)
> the 8 captive bottlenose dolphins and 14 captive California sea lions
> that escaped from the destroyed aquarium no longer pose a threat to
> wild populations for potential disease transmission and/or unwanted
> genetic exchange.

4.  **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

> This was the first NOAA-lead rescue of captive marine mammals that
> were traumatically released after a hurricane. It sets a precedent for
> future cooperation among USDA-APHIS, the public display community, and
> NOAA in protecting marine mammals both in captivity and in the wild.
> In addition, this effort involved significant coordination with the
> U.S. Navy in the follow up care and treatment of the animals.

5.  **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation?**

> No.

6.  **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

> The Team provided significant support to the local stranding network,
> the public, and the marine mammal community by leading effective and
> rapid responses to two hurricanes that occurred in close succession.
> The partnerships the Team formed will tremendously enhance NOAA's
> ability to successfully respond to future crises involving protected
> species in peril.

**David Boughton Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #31**

(Originally submitted as Silver; NIAB did not forward)

**Nominees**

  ------------------- -------------------------- ------------ -------------
  First and Last      **NOAA Fisheries Service** Position     Past Awards
  Name, Ph.D.(if                                 Title &      (e.g.
  appropriate)                                   Grade or Pay Department
                                                 Band         Gold Medal)

  David Boughton,     Southwest Fisheries        ZP-0408-3    
  Ph.D.               Science Center                          

  Peter Adams, Ph.D.  Southwest Fisheries        ZP-0482-4    
                      Science Center                          

  Churchill Grimes,   Southwest Fisheries        ZP--0482-5   
  Ph.D.               Science Center                          
  ------------------- -------------------------- ------------ -------------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

The strong scientific foundation for recovering Endangered Species
Act-listed salmonids under the first California Coastal Salmonid
Monitoring Plan is generating confidence and acceptance by previously
skeptical stakeholders.

**Certificate Text**

For building consensus among diverse stakeholders to create and
implement the first California Coastal Salmonid Monitoring Plan for
measuring recovery under the Endangered Species Act.

**Definitions**

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Generally, the status of a population, in terms of the number of
specimens increasing, decreasing, or remaining the same, is the basis
for changing the status of a specific species under the Endangered
Species Act. The absence of measurable recovery standards for salmonids
in California fostered a lack of confidence in the recovery planning
process by all stakeholders. In contrast, measurable recovery plans were
implemented in the Northwest Pacific more than a decade ago.
Implementing a similar plan in California was essential for NOAA to
attain Pacific salmonid recovery goals.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Developing the California Salmonid Coastal Monitoring Plan was a complex
and difficult process due to the differing, and sometimes conflicting,
perspectives of the large number of agencies and groups involved.
Creating consensus was essential for success. The process included
representatives from the States of California and Oregon, the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Forest Service, and numerous other
government, private, and industry groups.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The Team worked with representatives from the California Department of
Fish and Game to convene two workshops for knowledgeable agency and
academic scientists to generate goals and objectives for a salmonid
recovery program. After reviewing existing monitoring plans in
California and elsewhere on the West Coast, participants at the first
workshop devised a strategy for developing monitoring program goals.
Participants at the second workshop identified specific monitoring goals
and requirements for individual recovery areas, including sampling
methods and procedures, and species management units. With agreement to
focus monitoring on sampling adult populations, the policy outputs from
these workshops formed the elements of the Plan, which the Team assisted
in writing.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Implementing this monitoring plan provided the strong scientific basis
necessary to initiate the recovery process for California Endangered
Species Act (ESA) listed salmonids. The ability to assess salmonid
population status and trends is central to any change in listing under
the ESA.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

This two-year process included extensive comment and review at every
stage. Further, comments and revisions continued for another six months
after completion of the plan in July 2005.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The adroit leadership and perseverance of this Team resulted in a
monitoring plan that creates a strong scientific foundation for the
recovery process of the Southwest Pacific Endangered Species Act-listed
salmonids, thereby creating confidence and acceptance by previously
skeptical stakeholders.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

In the long term, the monitoring plan will impact nearly all NOAA
Fisheries Service activities in the Southwest Region by providing
necessary data for a range of agency activities.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The plan also enables agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and the U.S. Forest Service to make more informed resource
management decisions for actions, which potentially impact salmonid
populations.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

The recognition that recovery decisions are based on a sound scientific
process brings confidence and acceptance from stakeholders. Their
approval is tremendously important, because ultimately it will be the
stakeholders who accomplish salmonid recovery.

**John Bortniak Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #32**

**[Nominees]{.underline}**

+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| First and     | NOAA Fisheries Service | Position    | Past Awards  |
| Last Name,    |                        | Title &     | (e.g.        |
| Ph.D.(if      |                        | Grade or    | Department   |
| appropriate)  |                        | Pay Band    | Gold Medal)  |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| John Bortniak | Office of Management   | Program     | 2005 Bronze  |
|               | and Budget             | Analyst     |              |
|               |                        |             |              |
|               |                        | ZA-343-4    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| Barry Thom    | Northwest Regional     | Fish        |              |
|               | Office                 | Biologist   |              |
|               |                        |             |              |
|               |                        | ZP-482-4    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| Tiyo Fonte    | Office of Management   | Budget      | 2003         |
|               | and Budget             | Analyst     | Adm          |
|               |                        |             | inistrator's |
|               |                        | ZA-560-4    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| Lori Budbill  | Alaska Fisheries       | Mgmt. &     |              |
|               | Science Center         | Prog.       |              |
|               |                        | Analysis    |              |
|               |                        | Officer     |              |
|               |                        |             |              |
|               |                        | ZA-343-4    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| Margaret      | Southeast Regional     | Mgmt. &     |              |
| Solomon       | Office                 | Prog.       |              |
|               |                        |             |              |
|               |                        | Analysis    |              |
|               |                        | Officer     |              |
|               |                        |             |              |
|               |                        | ZA-343-4    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| John Moakley  | Northeast Regional     | Supv. Mgmt. |              |
|               | Office                 | & Prog.     |              |
|               |                        | Analysis    |              |
|               |                        | Officer     |              |
|               |                        | ZA-343-5    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+
| Steven        | Office of Science and  | Fish        |              |
| Swartz, Ph.D. | Technology             | Biologist,  |              |
|               |                        | Mgmt.       |              |
|               |                        | ZP-482-5    |              |
+---------------+------------------------+-------------+--------------+

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

The e-AOP facilitates the ability to plan and manage resources and
milestones via a web-based milestone tracking system, capabilities
previously unavailable, in support of the NOAA Fisheries Service and
PPBES Program managers.

**Certificate Text**

For developing and implementing the electronic Annual Operating Plan
system for budget and performance planning, tracking, and reporting for
PPBES.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

In response to the strategic planning needs of NOAA senior management,
the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System (PPBES) was
developed and implemented throughout NOAA. This sequential, phased, and
overlapping process provides programmatic linkages between the corporate
strategy and available and planned resources. This approach gives senior
management the ability to establish high-level priorities and allocate
associated resources as needed. At that time, however, the budget coding
structure used by NOAA did not provide a means of categorizing resources
in the terms required by the PPBES, that is, by program or capability.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Similarly, at that time current and future year resources within the
NOAA Fisheries Service were allocated only along organizational lines
(e.g., Line Office, Regional Office, Science Center, Headquarters
Office, and Division levels). NOAA Fisheries Services' appropriations
and associated activities for which the funds were provided, or
requested, could not be expressed or accounted for in terms of a
specific program, such as Habitat Conservation or Protected Species, or
as a program capability, such as Consultation or Fishery Plan
Development, in a consistent and understandable manner. Similarly, the
NOAA Fisheries Service also could not plan or report milestones by
capabilities in a consistent fashion. Consequently, PPBES Program
Managers within the NOAA Fisheries Service used a variety of ad hoc
systems or methods to plan and track the execution of Program resources.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

This Team was instrumental in conceiving, developing, testing, and
deploying a first-of-its-kind, state-of-the-technology system within the
NOAA Fisheries that significantly enhances the ability to plan, budget,
execute, and report resources. The electronic Annual Operating Plan
(e-AOP) system is unique in all of NOAA in that this single system
tracks performance against planned milestones in real time, links actual
deployment of resources to the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and
Execution System (PPBES) within NOAA, and bridges the gap inherent in
managing across a Program structure that differs from an organizational
structure.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The e-AOP is a key tool for use in conjunction with PPBES for
understanding, managing, and planning of actual deployment of funds
throughout the NOAA Fisheries Service. The web-enabled application
provides a means to plan and track the execution of a current fiscal
year and also significantly contributes to the development of Program
Operating Plans (POP) for planning out-year funds. Its reporting
capabilities serve the needs of NOAA Fisheries and the NOAA PPBES
Programs to a greater degree than that provided by the NOAA Fisheries
Financial Reporting System (FRS).

Fully integrated with FRS and the Commerce CBS Systems, the e-AOP
produces dynamic, real time fiscal and personnel information. Functions
include planning and reporting of milestones, aligning an organizational
unit's budgets to program capabilities, and cross-cutting the budget of
the NOAA Fisheries Service by key subject areas. It enables field units
to build an annual portfolio of milestones describing the full spectrum
of planned accomplishments. Program Managers then are able to view and
select key milestones across the organization for NOAA level tracking
and real time reporting on milestone progress.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Efforts began in 2005, with continual improvements planned to be
on-going.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The e-AOP facilitates the NOAA Fisheries Services\' ability to plan and
manage resources and milestones. The system provides previously
unavailable budget execution data, showing actual deployment of
resources in terms of Program Capabilities, key to management by PPBES.
The system facilitates milestone development at all levels of the
organization and provides Program Managers with the ability to tag and
report key milestones for their Program. In FY 2006, nearly 2000
milestones were entered, with nearly 400 of these tracked and reported
by a PPBES Program Manager.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The capabilities of the e-AOP will empower NOAA Fisheries employees with
an improved understanding of Agency milestones expressed both
organizationally and strategically -- thus providing broader commitment
and understanding of NOAA Fisheries Service's goals and progress towards
those goals.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The e-AOP is a first-of-its-kind, state-of-the-technology, web-based
system within NOAA that significantly enhances the ability of a Line or
Corporate Office to plan, budget, execute, and report to on its
resources.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

This system provides the ability for the manager of any organizational
component, at any level within NOAA Fisheries, to plan and report budget
execution and to develop and track annual milestones, all categorized by
Program Capabilities. At the same time, it provides PPBES Program
Managers with a means to develop and manage their portfolio of
milestones as a subset of these organizational milestones. The system,
for FY 2006, houses nearly 2000 NMFS milestones and nearly 400 Program
level milestones - all can be tracked within the e-AOP by any user.
These points were instrumental in transitioning the field units to
management by PPBES. Finally, the e-AOP system fully automates the
process to assemble an Annual Operating Plan from input from multiple
FMCs into required formats.

**David Ackley Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #33**

**[Nominees]{.underline}**

  ---------------- ------------------ --------------------------- ---------
  First and Last   NOAA Fisheries     Position Title & Grade or   Past
  Name, Ph.D.(if   Service            Pay Band                    Awards
  appropriate)                                                    

  David Ackley     Alaska Region, SF  Supervisory Biologist ZP    
                                      401 IV                      

  Gregory Bledsoe  Alaska Region, OMI Supervisory IT Specialist   
                                      ZP 2210 IV                  

  Tamara Bledsoe   Alaska Region, RAM IT Specialist ZP 2210 III   

  Jessica Gharrett Alaska Region, RAM Supervisory Biologist ZP    Bronze
                                      401 IV                      '05

  Stephen Kocsis   Alaska Region, SF  IT Specialist ZP 2210 III   

  Marina Lindsey   Alaska Region, OMI IT Specialist ZP 2210 III   

  Pamela Mason     Alaska Region, SF  IT Specialist ZP 2210 IV    

  Jennifer         Alaska Region, SF  Res. Mgt Specialist ZP 401  
  Mondragon                           III                         

  Larry Talley     Alaska Region, SF  IT Specialist ZP 2210 III   

  Jennifer Watson  Alaska Region, SF  Res. Mgt Specialist ZP 401  
                                      III                         

  Robert Keaton    Alaska Region, SF  Res. Mgt. Specialist ZP 401 
                                      III                         
  ---------------- ------------------ --------------------------- ---------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

The reliable, readily accessible, and efficient Interagency Electronic
Catch Reporting System provides the necessary information to support
management programs implemented to promote long term sustainability of
North Pacific fishery resources.

**Certificate Text**

For implementing an Interagency Electronic Catch Reporting System for
the North Pacific fisheries to ensure effective industry reporting and
support.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

North Pacific fishery resources are jointly managed by the NOAA
Fisheries Service, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and the
International Pacific Halibut Commission. The number of fishing quotas
for these resources will continue to increase rapidly as new limited
access privilege programs are implemented in response either to
congressional mandates or to NOAA policy objectives for management
measures that promote sustainable fisheries. Timely and accurate catch
reporting is imperative for maintaining overall harvest within
established quota amounts and is not easily accomplished via the
historically used paper-based procedures. Instead, an electronic
reporting capability is required.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The BSAI Crab Rationalization Program for North Pacific fisheries,
mandated by Congress for implementation in 2005, was the first limited
access privilege program to require very timely and accurate catch
reporting in Alaska. The Team, faced with a short deadline, coordinated
with representatives from the Alaska Fish and Game and the International
Pacific Halibut Commission to identify each agency's information needs
to implement this Program.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Based on the information needs and reporting requirements of NOAA, the
Alaskan agency, and the International Commission, the Team developed a
software application for an Interagency Electronic Catch Reporting
System. The Team tested the use of this system at numerous fishing
processing sites around Alaska. Subsequently, the Team modified the
system to meet identified industry needs, and formed a client services
support capability to answer questions and address site specific
problems.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The Interagency Electronic Catch Reporting System is reliable, readily
accessible, and reduces duplicative data entry. Implemented in 2005, it
allows crab fishermen and processors to enter data once while meeting
the reporting requirements of two of three different management
agencies. The Team also provides a responsive client support service
that is available 7 days a week. This Reporting System was expanded in
late 2005 and early 2006 to provide time critical information required
to manage the North Pacific groundfish and Pacific halibut fishery
management programs.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The Team began development of the Interagency Electronic Catch Reporting
System in 2004 and implemented it in 2005.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

By 2007, the System will become mandatory as a replacement for an
antiquated system for catch reporting in all federally managed fisheries
currently using the older system in the North Pacific.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The System provides the accuracy and efficiency for the data collection
necessary to support management programs implemented to promote long
term sustainability of fishery resources while enhancing the public
interest in sound management of these resources. Also, this system is
likely to serve as a prototype for information collection programs in
support of the increasing number of limited access privilege programs
expected to be implemented by NOAA to address fishery conservation and
management concerns.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes. The NOAA Team coordinated with Alaska Department of Fish and Game
and the International Pacific Halibut Commission to ensure that the
System produces reports useful to all three agencies.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. The Interagency Electronic Catch Reporting System is the first of
its kind in the North Pacific and will replace the antiquated system for
catch reporting in all federally managed fisheries currently using the
older system in the North Pacific.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Yes. The 7 days a week client support service developed and implemented
by the Team is valued by participating crab fishermen and processors,
and the general public in the North Pacific.

**Melissa Baird Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #34**

Nominees

  ------------------ --------------------------- ---------------- --------
  First and Last     NOAA Fisheries Service      Position Title & Past
  Name, Ph.D.(if                                 Grade or Pay     Awards
  appropriate)                                   Band             

  Melissa Baird      Northwest Fisheries Science Biol Tech, GS-7  
                     Center                                       

  David Kuligowski   Northwest Fisheries Science Res Fish Bio     Bronze
                     Center                      GS-11            1996

  Paul Moran, Ph.D.  Northwest Fisheries Science Res Mol Gen,     Bronze
                     Center                      GS-13            1996

  David Teel         Northwest Fisheries Science Res Fish Bio,    Bronze
                     Center                      GS-12            1996

  Don VanDoornik     Northwest Fisheries Science Res Fish Bio,    Bronze
                     Center                      GS-11            1996

  Carlos Garza,      Southwest Fisheries Science Sup Res M Gen,   
  Ph.D.              Center                      ZP-3             

  Devon Pearse       Southwest Fisheries Science Res Mol Gen,     
                     Center                      ZP-2             

  Charles Guthrie    Alaska Fisheries Science    Res Fish Bio, ZP 
                     Center                      3                

  Richard Wilmot,    Alaska Fisheries Science    Sup Res Gen, ZP  
  Ph.D.              Center                      4                
  ------------------ --------------------------- ---------------- --------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation and management measures for
Chinook salmon is significantly aided by the ability to identify
migrating juveniles from southern California to northwest Alaska using
the newly developed standardized DNA database.

**Certificate Text**

For creating a collaborative, standardized coast-wide genetic database
of Chinook salmon populations to estimate stock composition in mixed
populations.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

NOAA's environmental stewardship goal promotes sustainable marine
fisheries via scientifically sound management measures. Harvest, or
catch data are frequently used to evaluate composition and quantity of
specific fish populations to assess the effectiveness of management
measures in returning to, or maintaining, sustainable populations. In
the case of Pacific salmon, catch data frequently includes multiple
distinct spawning stocks, each with different sustainable harvest rates.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Fisheries managers largely rely on tag recoveries to estimate
stock-specific harvest impacts. This method became less effective with
the Endangered Species Act listings of many wild salmon stocks and
genetic marking of selective salmon hatchery stocks. Further, tagging
sufficient numbers of wild salmon to yield reliable catch data is very
difficult. Another method of estimating catch composition for Pacific
Salmon was needed. This Team investigated using DNA profiles for Pacific
salmon as a substitute for the tagging method.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

While federal, state, and university laboratories had collected DNA
profiles from Pacific salmon for years, the data were not compatible
across regions or laboratories. In the fall of 2003, the Team met with
representatives from these agencies and universities to identify a
common set of genes and procedures such that data collected for Chinook
salmon by multiple laboratories would be compatible. The Team
successfully negotiated a consensus among participants that each
laboratory would replace the specific sets of genes currently used for
local applications with those agreed upon by the group.

The next step was to develop a standardized scoring system for the
genetic profile measurements as variation existed across laboratories.
The Team led the effort to establish a system of common genetic
"holotypes" for each variant, using naturally occurring proteins in
each. Sharing the holotypes among all laboratories, blind tests were
conducted to evaluate each laboratory's ability to correctly identify
samples and to develop common criteria for data quality.

The Team then led the effort to create a database of more than 16,000
samples collected from California to Alaska, and test the ability of
participating laboratories to provide stock estimates.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Estimates of regional composition of mixed stock catches were obtained
with an average accuracy of 96 percent using the database. This
accomplishment is significant and timely as genetic stock identification
is expected to play an increasingly important role in salmon fishery
management in the next several years.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The Team's efforts began in the fall of 2003, and a report describing
the success of the standardized genetic database of Chinook salmon
populations in estimating stock compositions was presented to the
Pacific Salmon Commission in October 2005.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center is using the standardized,
coast-wide genetic database for Pacific Chinook salmon populations as a
pilot project to estimate the contribution of Klamath River Fall Chinook
to California fisheries. The NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center is
using the DNA database to determine which salmon are most important to
Endangered Species Act-listed killer whales.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Described in the October 2005 report to the Pacific Salmon Commission,
the Chinook salmon DNA database is likely to play a much broader role in
ocean harvest/catch management under the Pacific Fisheries Management
Council and the Commission during the next several years.

Further, the use of this genetic stock identification technique is
expected to be expanded to other marine species.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes. Participants in this effort include representatives from the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game, the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife, the California Department of Fish and Game, the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the National Biological Service of
the US Geological Survey, among others.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. This ambitious multi-agency collaboration to standardize the
collection of genetic data for Chinook salmon from southern California
to northwest Alaska provides a scientific basis for evaluating the
effectiveness of conservation and management measures for specific
salmon stocks by accurately identifying migrating juvenile salmon.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?** Not
applicable.

**Thomas Cooney Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #35**

Nominees

+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| First and Last  | NOAA Fisheries        | Position  | Past Awards   |
| Name, Ph.D.(if  | Service               | Title &   |               |
| appropriate)    |                       | Grade or  |               |
|                 |                       | Pay Band  |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Thomas Cooney,  | Northwest Fisheries   | Res.      | Bronze, 2005  |
| Ph.D.           | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
|                 |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       | GS-14     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Damon Holzer    | Northwest Fisheries   | Car       |               |
|                 | Science Center        | tographer |               |
|                 |                       | GS-11     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Peter Lawson,   | Northwest Fisheries   | Res.      |               |
| Ph.D.           | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
|                 |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       | GS-13     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Michelle        | Northwest Fisheries   | Res.      | Bronze, 2005  |
| McClure, Ph.D.  | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
|                 |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       | GS-13     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Heather Stout   | Northwest Fisheries   | Res.      |               |
|                 | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
|                 |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       | GS-12     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Thomas          | Northwest Fisheries   | Res.      |               |
| Wainwright,     | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
| Ph.D.           |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       | GS-13     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Christopher     | Northwest Fisheries   | Supv.     | Bronze, 2005  |
| Jordan, Ph.D.   | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
|                 |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       |           |               |
|                 |                       | ZP-IV     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Kim Kratz,      | Northwest Regional    | Fish      | Bronze, 2005  |
| Ph.D.           | Office                | Biol.     |               |
|                 |                       | ZP-IV     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+
| Mary            | Northwest Fisheries   | Supv.     | Bronze, 2005  |
| Ruckelshaus,    | Science Center        | Fish.     |               |
| Ph.D.           |                       | Bio.      |               |
|                 |                       | ZP-IV     |               |
+-----------------+-----------------------+-----------+---------------+

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

Integrating considerable complex technical data, this adaptive approach
to creating recovery plans incorporates adjustments as new information
becomes available, and thereby significantly

advances NOAA's ability to fulfill its stewardship role for conserving
and managing Pacific Northwest salmon.

**Certificate Text**

For developing the scientific foundation for an adaptive approach to
recovery planning for Endangered Species Act-listed salmon in the
Columbia River and along the Oregon coast.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

NOAA's primary objective of conserving species listed under the
Endangered Species Act, the one that matters in the end, is recovery.
Key success factors are: 1) a sound scientific understanding of the
biological factors underpinning species viability and the key threats
encountered by the species, and 2) capabilities to adapting recovery
plans to adjust to new information. Achieving recovery of Endangered
Species Act-listed salmon is a formidable task. Its life-cycle is
complex, and its essential habitats include areas highly developed for
other purposes.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

In a politically charged atmosphere with on-going law suits, the Team
investigated strategies to develop and implement salmon recovery plans
that identify the causes of deteriorating salmon populations and what
actions would create increasing populations and eventual recovery.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Using considerable negotiation skills and scientific expertise, the Team
collaborated with colleagues from agencies whose opinions often
conflicted greatly with theirs to form a consensus on the following
technical issues: 1) accounting for the uncertainty inherent in
productivity, abundance, diversity, and spatial structure to generate
extinction rates; and 2) accounting for the effect of uncertainty on
projections of extinction risk derived via analytical methods, including
a fuzzy logic-based management support system.

Further, Team members 1) incorporated estimated contributions of salmon
mortality during critical estuarine and early ocean survival phases into
their analyses; 2) evaluated the impacts of a range of likely futures
environmental scenarios; and 3) integrated resulting estimates of
viability and extinction risk at the population levels for entire
evolutionary significant units, or discrete populations, of salmon.
Collectively, these agreed upon technical approaches represent an
extremely valuable advance in salmon conservation biology and
management.

Building upon earlier strategies to develop and implement salmon
recovery plans, the Team incorporated the newly devised technical
approaches described above to create an adaptive management approach
that links recovery plans for 17 evolutionary significant units, or
discrete populations, of salmon in the interior Columbia River and on
the Oregon coast with NOAA's statutory, regulatory, and policy
requirements.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The resulting adaptive recovery approach advances NOAA's ability to
partner with stakeholders to rank and sequence recovery efforts for each
of 17 distinct salmon populations, thereby generating consensus for an
ecosystem approach for recovery to sustainable population levels.
Federal, state, tribal, and local entities began to use this new
approach in December 2005.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Developed over several years, the new adaptive recovery approach began
to be used in December 2005, by federal, state, tribal, and local
entities.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

This adaptive recovery approach is functioning as a template for a
region-wide approach to recovery plan development, implementation, and
monitoring. Its use will enhance completion of recovery plans by
December 2006, implementation of the plans, and future salmon
conservation management.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The newly devised adaptive recovery approach incorporates the core of
the scientific guidance necessary to meet NOAA's goal to promote
environmental stewardship through protecting and managing Pacific salmon
and the habitats they require to maintain healthy, sustainable
populations.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Federal, state, tribal, and local entities active in planning for
recovery of salmon populations in the interior Columbia River and along
the Oregon coast began to use this new approach in December 2005.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Incorporating considerable complex technical data, this adaptive
approach to creating recovery plans that adjust as new information
becomes available is a significant achievement towards enabling NOAA to
fulfill its stewardship role for conserving and managing Pacific
Northwest salmon.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?** Not
applicable.

**Sam Flanagan Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #36**

**Nominees**

  ----------------- -------------------- --------------- -----------------
  **\               **NOAA Fisheries     **Position      **Past Awards
  First and Last    Service**            Title & Grade   (e.g. Department
  Name, Ph.D.(if                         or Pay Band**   Gold Medal)**
  appropriate)**                                         

  Sam Flanagan      Southwest Region     Fish Biologist, Bronze Medal,
                    Office               ZP-III          1999

  John Clancy       Southwest Region     Supervisory     Bronze Medal,
                    Office               Fish Biologist, 2003
                                         ZP-IV           

  James Simondet    Southwest Region     Fish Biologist, 
                    Office               ZP-III          

  Richard Wantuck   Southwest Region     Hydrological    
                    Office               Engineer, ZP-IV 
  ----------------- -------------------- --------------- -----------------

**Nominator's Name**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

This first Habitat Conservation Plan to address water management issues
in California successfully balances requirements to protect endangered
salmonids with financial and operational capabilities of water diversion
facilities, thereby garnering industry support for the Plan.

**Certificate Text**

For developing the Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District Habitat
Conservation Plan to promote and conserve ESA listed Coho, steelhead,
Chinook, and associated aquatic habitat.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

NOAA is mandated by the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conserve and
recover threatened and endangered salmonid populations. Representing
some of the last significant native gene resources in Northern
California, the salmonid populations in Humboldt Bay are critical to
conservation and eventual recovery of these species. Located on the Mad
River, operation and maintenance of the Humboldt Bay Municipal Water
District Habitat was incidentally, or accidentally, killing/harming or
taking, Chinook and Coho salmon, and baby and juvenile steelhead trout,
all of which are listed as threatened under the Act. Negative impacts of
deteriorated water quality and inadequate quantities of water downstream
from its facilities were killing these salmonids whose declining
populations are known to be limiting factors to the recovery of these
species.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District is a regional water supplier
operating aging diversion facilities and without the financial reserves
to construct new ones that would meet diversion criteria required to
protect the salmonids. The Team partnered with District representatives
to devise a solution to balance protection of these species with
financial and operational considerations.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

A component of NOAA's regulatory jurisdiction is to designate critical
habitats for each species listed under the Act. NOAA also has authority
to issue permits for incidental or accidental harming or killing of an
endangered species if the applicant provides NOAA with a Habitat
Conservation Plan to mitigate some of the existing negative factors.
This procedure assumes that the improvements agreed to in the Plan will
result in significantly less harm to the impacted species.

Team members collaborated with District representatives to generate a
aHabitat Conservation Plan with a performance based approach that allows
for operation of the existing facility with minor, less costly,
screening and operation modifications. Team members ensured compliance
with the National Environmental Policy and the National Historic
Preservation Acts; evaluated the diversion facilities and recommended
modifications to operations; and identified performance criteria
required for continued compliant operation of the facilities.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Monitoring of the Habitat Conservation Plan is demonstrating its
successful implementation as recorded incidental take or accidental
killing is less that 10 percent of that allowed within the Plan.

Almost as important is the effective partnership between District and
NOAA representatives.

The District's Habitat Conservation Plan is the first to address water
management issues in California, issues that are often complex and
contentious. Industry closely watched the proceedings for indications
that species protection would be balanced with financial and operational
ones. The successful results were discussed at several industry forums
in the region, and NOAA received complementary letters from District
representatives.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The District submitted its Habitat Conservation Plan to NOAA in 2003,
and performance monitoring of the Plan's implementation is on-going.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

A significantly smaller number of Chinook and Coho salmon, and baby and
juvenile steelhead trout are harmed or killed by operations of the
Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District water diversion facilities on the
Mad River in northern California.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Simultaneously achieving economically feasible improvements to water
diversion operations and preserving larger numbers of salmonids may
promote additional partnerships among industry and NOAA representatives
to further improve the status of endangered salmonids.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

The successful resolution of endangered species issues from NOAA's
perspective with economic ones from industry's perspectives generated
significant acceptance by stakeholders and the public of NOAA's
environmental stewardship responsibilities, especially for salmon.

**Steven Fromm Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #37**

**Nominees**

  ------------------ ------------------------- -------------------- --------
  First and Last     NOAA Fisheries Service    Position Title &     Past
  Name, Ph.D.(if                               Grade or Pay Band    Awards
  appropriate)                                                      

  Steven Fromm       Northeast Fisheries       IT Specialist, GS-12 
                     Science Center                                 

  Suellen Fromm      Northeast Fisheries       IT Specialist, GS-12 
                     Science Center                                 

  David Packer,      Northeast Fisheries       Ecologist, GS-12     
  Ph.D.              Science Center                                 

  Jeffrey Pessutti   Northeast Fisheries       Phys. Sci. Tech.,    
                     Science Center            GS-7                 

  Donna Johnson      Northeast Fisheries       Res. Fish.           
                     Science Center            Biol.,GS-11          

  David Chevrier,    Northeast Fisheries       IT Specialist,       
  Ph.D.              Science Center            ZP-3/1               

  Greg Lough, Ph.D.  Northeast Fisheries       Res. Oceanogr.,      
                     Science Center            ZP-5/3               

  Lisa Hendrickson,  Northeast Fisheries       Res. Fish. Biol.,    
  Ph.D.              Science Center            ZP-3/3               

  Jose Pereira       Northeast Fisheries       Res. Fish. Biol.,    
                     Science Center            ZP-3/3               

  David Stevenson,   Northeast Regional Office Marine Resources     
  Ph.D.                                        Habitat Specialist,  
                                               ZP-4/3               
  ------------------ ------------------------- -------------------- --------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

The enormous task of reviewing and revising over 30 Essential Fish
Habitat Source Documents in a expeditious manner for submittal to the
New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Councils facilitated
preservation of essential habitats to promote sustainable marine
fisheries, and also brought considerable credit to NOAA for the
extremely professional and valuable effort.

**Certificate Text**

For the expeditious review and revision of over 30 species documents for
the designation of Essential Fish Habitat by the Fishery Management
Councils.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

The New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Councils depend
primarily upon the NOAA Northeast Fishery Science Center to publish
Technical Memorandums describing the distribution and habitat
associations of all managed fish species. These "Essential Fish Habitat
Source Documents" are vital for designating essential habitats for
specific species. With a mandate to update the documents every five
years, over thirty Source Documents required review and revision in 2004
and 2005.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The enormity of reviewing and revising more than thirty Essential Fish
Habitat Source Documents should not be underestimated. With limited
personnel and funding support, a core group of dedicated authors,
editors and habitat mappers coordinated a Center-wide effort to meet
this need. This was accomplished through meetings, teleconferences,
guidance documents, and numerous emails and phone calls with over
twenty-five contributing staff.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

For each managed fish species, the Team generated the following:

-   distribution by life-history stage by season, updated by
    incorporating data covering the entire duration of the Center's
    trawl surveys and presented as habitat maps;

-   food habitats and predator-prey associations presented as charts;

-   exhaustive review of recent literature for new data on habitat
    parameters such as temperature, salinity, and substrate type, and
    presented in tables and detailed text; and

-   further research needs for each species.

The Team created hundreds of maps; and reviewed thousands of trawl
survey records from the 1960s to the present. The actual mapping process
required almost a year for several Team members to complete. Literature
reviews were relatively easy to complete for some species, and a
gargantuan task for others such as Atlantic cod and Atlantic herring.
Finally, each draft report was reviewed and assimilated in a standard
format. All in all, several months of labor, on average, were invested
in completing each updated Source Document.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

As completed, Essential Fish Habitat Source Documents were immediately
submitted to the New England and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils for use during development of their Fishery Management Plans.
Both Councils rely almost exclusively upon the information contained
within these documents to designate Essential Fish Habitat in their
areas of jurisdiction. Accordingly, these documents are an extremely
valuable contribution of NOAA in support the management of our nation's
fisheries.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Over thirty Essential Fish Habitat Source Documents were reviewed and
revised in 2004 and 2005.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

As the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act mandates
the protection of Essential Fish Habitat, these documents serve not only
to promote the sustainability of a vibrant fishery but also the
conservation of important marine habitats.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

Not applicable.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Essential Fish Habitat Source Documents are used by the New England and
the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Councils during development of their
Fishery Management Plans to identify associated Essential Fish Habitats.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable**.**

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Yes. This Team completed an enormous task, in an expedient manner,
bringing credit to NOAA from the New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Councils.

**John Higgins Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #38**

**Nominee(s)**

+----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------+
| **\            | **NOAA Fisheries | **Position      | **Past Awards  |
| First and Last | Service**        | Title & Grade   | (e.g.          |
| Name, Ph.D.(if |                  | or Pay Band**   | Department     |
| appropriate)** |                  |                 | Gold Medal)**  |
+----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------+
| John Higgins   | Northeast        | Equipment       |                |
|                | Regional Office  | Specialist      |                |
|                |                  |                 |                |
|                |                  | ZA 1670 III     |                |
+----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------+
| Amanda Johnson | Northeast        | Fishery         |                |
|                | Regional Office  | Biologist       |                |
|                |                  |                 |                |
|                |                  | ZP 0482 II      |                |
+----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------+
| John Kenney    | Northeast        | Mechanical      |                |
|                | Regional Office  | Engineer        |                |
|                |                  |                 |                |
|                |                  | ZP 0830 III     |                |
+----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------+
| Glenn Salvador | Northeast        | Equipment       | Bronze Medal   |
|                | Regional Office  | Specialist      | (2004)         |
|                |                  |                 |                |
|                |                  | ZA 1670 III     |                |
+----------------+------------------+-----------------+----------------+

**Nominator's Name**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

As a result of this gear buyback program, Right whales encounter fewer
potentially injurious situations in the North Atlantic, and NOAA's
stewardship responsibilities are reviewed more favorably by commercial
lobstermen.

**Certificate Text**

For exemplary leadership in managing a fishing gear buyback program that
promotes protection and conservation of endangered Right whales.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Nearly three quarters of the Right whale population in the North
Atlantic show scarring or other signs of injury from fishing gear.
During the past three years, nearly one dozen Right whales were
entangled in lobster trap/pot fishing gear used in waters off the
eastern United States. The Team's goal was to develop and implement a
program that would give commercial lobstermen an economic incentive to
use fishing gear less threatening to Right whales.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Lobster traps and pot gear are traditionally connected via a rope or
groundline that floats upward and forms loops similar to the humps on a
camel. These loops create a dangerous obstacle course for whales to swim
through. While diving and feeding, Right whales frequently become
entangled in the rope, jeopardizing their ability to breathe, eat, swim
and mate. The Team identified another type of line that lies on the
ocean bottom while tethering a series of traps or pots together, thereby
creating little potential danger to Right whales.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Collaborating with the [National Fish and Wildlife
Foundation](http://www.nfwf.org/), this Team designed a \$600,000 gear
buyback program to reimburse commercial lobstermen for exchanging the
floating line with the safer sinking line, and representatives of the
Foundation managed the program. During the fall of 2005, the Team
provided eligibility information to an estimated 1,000 commercial
fishermen who use pot or trap gear in the Mid-Atlantic region.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Thirty-eight commercial fishermen were eligible and accepted the offer.
Under the terms of the buyback program, fishermen were compensated \$2
for each pound of floating line exchanged. Compensation was by vouchers
that were redeemable at nine designated gear dealers in the region for
purchasing replacement line that sinks. Nearly 200,000 pounds of
floating fishing line were collected from more than three dozen
commercial pot and trap fishing operations in the Mid-Atlantic.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The program was conceived and implemented within a year, with
thirty-eight eligible commercial fishermen accepting the offer to
purchase replacement line in the fall of 2005.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

This buyback program promotes the protection and conservation of Right
whales in the North Atlantic. Further, the Team's efforts in developing
and implementing this multi-faceted program facilitated positive dialog
between NOAA and its stakeholders and generated considerable
appreciation for NOAA's stewardship responsibilities.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

It is likely that the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan
eventually will include a requirement for all commercial fishermen in
the North Atlantic to convert to the new gear.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable**.**

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Yes. The Team also identified a mechanism for disposing of the old
floating line. The retired line was trucked to a Massachusetts-based
waste management company specializing in environmentally sound recycling
and disposal of unique and difficult solid wastes. Further, the Team
helped the waste management company create a market for the recycled
line. Once broken into small pieces, the float rope can be melted to
create a recyclable plastic product for use in items such as compact
disk covers or as a wood substitute for decking or park benches.

**Robert Turner Group**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #39**

**Nominees**

  ----------------- ---------------------- ------------- -----------------
  First and Last    NOAA Fisheries Service Position      Past Awards (e.g.
  Name, Ph.D.(if                           Title & Grade Department Gold
  appropriate)                             or Pay Band   Medal)

  Robert Turner     Northwest Regional     ZP -480-5     Administrator's
                    Office                               2005

  David Hirsh       Northwest Regional     ZP-343-3      Administrator's
                    Office                               2002

  Laura Hamilton    Northwest Regional     ZP-482-3      Administrator's
                    Office                               2002
  ----------------- ---------------------- ------------- -----------------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

The Forest Practices Habitat Conservation Plan and the associated
50-year Incidental Take Permit revise forest practices for all 9.3
million acres of non-federal timberlands in the State of Washington,
thereby ensuring commercial harvest of timber occurs in a manner that
protects Endangered Species Listed salmon.

**Certificate Text**

For completing the largest Habitat Conservation Plan in the Nation: the
comprehensive Forest Practices Habitat Conservation Plan for Washington
State.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Salmon populations declined in the Pacific Northwest and Washington
State to the extent where they became candidates for listing under the
Endangered Species Act in the mid 1990's. In 1998, salmon species were
proposed for listing in over 75% of the landscape in Washington. In
response, the Washington Forest Protection Association requested the
NOAA Fisheries Service to negotiate a Habitat Conservation Plan with the
diverse and contentious stakeholders, believing that implementation of
such a plan would not be feasible without concurrence of all interested
parties.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The development of the Habitat Conservation Plan was achieved through
extremely high profile, controversial and lengthy multi-stakeholder
negotiations held over 9 years, that included representatives from state
government (Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington Department of Ecology),
local government (Washington Association of Counties), Indian tribes in
Washington State (27), environmental groups, Federal agencies (U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S.
Forest Service), and the timber industry (the Washington Forest
Protection Association, and Washington Farm Forestry Association).

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Exceptional leadership and creative negotiation skills were essential
for the Team to achieve concurrence among such a diverse group of
stakeholders with conflicting interests. The Team generated the required
Environmental Impact Statement, including extensive responses to public
comment and a formal Record of the Decision; a Biological Opinion to
explain in technical detail how implementing the proposed Habitat
Conservation Plan would succeed in protecting the species; a Set of
Findings presenting additional documentation, and the Incidental Take
Permit, which allows some low level of takings or harm to the species in
exchange for abiding by the terms of the Plan. Key to the effort's
success was the creative manner in which riparian areas were designed to
provide ecological functions for fish, while allowing enough timber
harvest to make forestry economically viable in Washington.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The Team successfully completed the legally mandated documents necessary
to allow issuance of an Incidental Take Permit, under Section 10 of the
Endangered Species Act, for the largest Habitat Conservation Plan in the
Nation. The 50-year Permit and the associated Plan revise forest
practices for all 9.3 million acres of non-federal timberlands in the
State of Washington. Consequently, commercial harvest of timber will
occur in a manner that protects Endangered Species Listed salmon.

The Habitat Conservation Plan promotes a landscape that is "properly
functioning" for the essential habitat functions necessary for the long
term survival of salmon. This is "ecosystem management" in the sense
envisioned by the NOAA strategic plan. That is, under this Plan, the
forest ecosystem is maintained to allow listed salmon to migrate and
rear in cool clean water; where the natural cycles of wood recruitment
to streams occurs; putting channel forming wood in place via natural
processes; and extraneous sediments from landslides are minimized due to
careful planning that creates a natural distribution of spawning gravels
in the tributary and mainstem rivers.

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

This effort spanned over 9 years.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

In the short term, the completed process demonstrates to other states
that it is possible to successfully reshape forest practices over a
large statewide geography in a manner that protects both fish and human
interests via effective ecosystem management.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

In the long term, this achievement will demonstrate that NOAA
representatives are capable of successfully partnering with other
federal, state and private interests, while upholding treaty trust
responsibilities with Indian Tribes and environmental stakeholders.
Equally important, it will affirm that ecosystem management of forest
resources is a sustainable long term strategy.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

As a participating stakeholder in the planning effort, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service is directly affected by this Habitat Conservation Plan
and the associated Incidental Take Permit, and is issuing its own
Incidental Take Permit for this same Plan.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The major policy breakthrough was the creative manner in which the
riparian areas were designed to provide ecological functions for fish,
while allowing enough timber harvest to make forestry economically
viable in Washington.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Restricted Access Management Program**

**(Organizational Nomination)**

**NMFS**

**Nomination #40**

**Nominee**

  ----------------- -------------------- ---------------- ----------------
  First and Last    NOAA Fisheries       Position Title & Past Awards
  Name, Ph.D.(if    Service              Grade or Pay     
  appropriate)                           Band             

  Restricted Access Alaska Regional      N/A              Organizational
  Management        Office                                Bronze, 1996
  Program                                                 
  ----------------- -------------------- ---------------- ----------------

**Nominator**

William T. Hogarth, Ph.D.

Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

**Significance**

The Restricted Access Management Program expeditiously completed a
myriad of tasks to convert written regulations into a functioning viable
program that significantly decreased the number of crab fishery
harvesting participants in the Alaskan waters for the foreseeable
future.

**Certificate Text**

For professional excellence and exemplary teamwork in implementing the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Crab Rationalization Program.

**Justification**

**What was the specific goal, challenge, or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

In early 2004, Congress mandated the Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Crab
Rationalization Program. This action initiated a concentrated and
complex 3-step effort, to include: a) developing the regulation to
identify and authorize components of the Program, b) creating a new
catch accounting and reporting system for use by the Program; and c)
implementing the Program by allocating harvesting and processing
privileges to eligible individuals and businesses, and then managing the
quota-related fishery operations.

**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Upon completion of the regulations and development of an automated catch
reporting system, the Restricted Access Management Program of the Alaska
Regional Office began the complicated process of implementing the Crab
Rationalization Program. Team members worked in an extremely emotionally
charged atmosphere as the results of their efforts would create winners
and losers for some of the commercial crab fishermen and processors. The
winners would be permitted to continue harvesting in the Alaskan crab
fishery according to the received quota level; losers would be required
to abstain from harvesting; and some local coastal communities would
continue to economically benefit from the fishery while others would
not.

**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Team members contacted all potentially eligible individuals and
businesses (approximately 550), provided application outreach and
assistance, collected and evaluated applications, provided due process
to those whose applications did not comport with official information,
and prepared formal determinations on applications (approved, partially
approved, or denied). Team members who dealt with the public were called
upon to provide clear and cogent explanations of the reasons for denial.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Coordinating with the North Pacific Fishery Management Council and the
NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center, the Team expeditiously completed
all tasks according to the congressionally mandated deadline and on a
time-line amenable to industry. Of the 550 applications received, an
estimated 20 percent were denied, in whole or in part.

Implementing the Crab Rationalization Program significantly altered the
manner in which the fisheries now operate. For instance, in one king
crab fishery, the number of harvesting vessels declined from 250 (in
2004) to 90 (in 2005), thus removing large amounts of "excess capital"
in the fishery and allowing for cleaner, slower, and safer operations.
Remaining vessels were, with few exceptions, deployed under authority of
cooperatives, a system whereby harvesting quota holders could join
forces and minimize their costs while maximizing their profits (and, not
incidentally, providing a higher quality of product to consumers).

**Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

This effort occurred during 2004 and 2005, and monitoring of the Program
will be on-going.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The Crab Rationalization Program remains very controversial. Continued
reporting and analysis is occurring to more fully explain the impacts of
the program on the stakeholders.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
NOAA's or the Department's mission?**

The long-term impact of the Crab Rationalization Program is still
unfolding. Careful reporting and analysis will illuminate it over time.
Anticipated benefits include a new era for the fishery that ends years
of wasteful, inefficient, and unsafe operations by more than 250 BSAI
crab fishery harvesting participants and creates a more sustainable
level of active participants under safer and more efficient conditions.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department of other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The Crab Rationalization Program fulfills the intentions of the Pacific
Fishery Management Council for management of this fishery.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or Automation? If so, how?**

Not applicable.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such**

**as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Yes. The Restricted Access Management Program expeditiously completed a
myriad of tasks to convert written regulations into a functioning viable
program that significantly decreased the number of crab fishery
harvesting participants in the Alaskan waters for the foreseeable
future.

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE NOMINATIONS

Doug Marcy

NOS

Nomination #80

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

[**Click Here to Go to Nomination**](#Marcy)

**(Or see nomination at end of document on page 295)**

Shyla Allen Group

**NOS**

**Nomination #41**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

## Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Response

  -------------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------- ----------------
  **Full Name**  **Pronunciation\   **Line or\        **Position\   **Past Awards**
                 of Name**          Staff Office**    Title\        
                                                      and Grade**   

  Shyla N. Allen                    National Ocean    Physical       
                                    Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-12         
                                    Survey                          

  Michael J.     An-niss            National Ocean    Physical       
  Annis                             Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-12         
                                    Survey                          

  Steven J.      Bro-day            National Ocean    Physical       
  Brodet                            Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-9          
                                    Survey                          

  Bryan E.       Shaw-vo            National Ocean    Physical       
  Chauveau                          Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-9          
                                    Survey                          

  Peter S.                          National Ocean    Physical       
  Holmberg                          Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-9          
                                    Survey                          

  LTJG Jay       Lom-nick-ee        National Ocean    NOAA Corp      
  Lomnicky                          Service\                        
                                    Office of Coast                 
                                    Survey                          

  Eric M. Moore                     National Ocean    Physical       
                                    Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-11         
                                    Survey                          

  Edward A.                         National Ocean    Physical       
  Owens                             Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-11         
                                    Survey                          

  Castle E.                         National Ocean    Physical      2000
  Parker                            Service\          Scientist\    Administrators
                                    Office of Coast   GS-12         Award\
                                    Survey                          2000 Bronze
                                                                    Medal\
                                                                    2005 Bronze
                                                                    Medal

  Helen F.                          National Ocean    Physical       
  Stewart                           Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-9          
                                    Survey                          

  Toshihiko      Tow-shee-hee-ko\   National Ocean    Physical       
  Uozumi         U-o-zoo-mee        Service\          Scientist\    
                                    Office of Coast   GS-11         
                                    Survey                          
  -------------- ------------------ ----------------- ------------- ----------------

**Organizations:** NOAA/NOS Office of Coast Survey (OCS)

***[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}***

NOAA conducted immediate emergency hydrographic surveys that enabled the
Coast Guard to reopen all 13 major economically-vital Gulf ports and
waterways within days after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita struck.

*[**I. Certificate Citation:**]{.underline}* For conducting emergency
surveys used by USCG to reopen 13 economically-vital Gulf ports and
waterways within days after Katrina and Rita struck.

**Nominated By:** Kathryn L. Ries

Deputy Director

NOAA/NOS-Office of Coast Survey

II. ***[Justification]{.underline}***

[Section 1. Definitions]{.underline}

Hydrographic survey---A survey of a water area, with particular
reference to submarine relief and any adjacent land.

Hydrography---The science that deals with the measurement and
description of the physical features of the oceans and adjoining coastal
areas, with particular reference to their use for navigational purposes.

Nautical chart---A special purpose map generally designed for purposes
of navigation.

Navigation Response Teams (NRTs)---Three person, mobile emergency
response teams that are deployed in emergencies as requested by federal,
state and local governments/port authorities. They have trailorable
small survey launches equipped with side scan sonar to survey waterways
for wrecked vessels and oil rigs, large debris, and shoaling that can
damage or ground passing vessels.

OCS---Office of Coast Survey, NOAA's National Ocean Service

USCG---United States Coast Guard

[Section 2. Award Justification]{.underline}

*What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?*

These activities directly support both the DOC strategic goal to
"provide the information and tools to maximize U.S. competitiveness and
enable economic growth" and the related NOAA goal to "support the
nation's commerce with information for safe, efficient and
environmentally sound transportation." Essential to the movement of food
and relief supplies, the Gulf ports and waterways are also vital to the
transport of oil and coal.

*What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?*

Waterways had to be surveyed and cleared before vessels could safely
transit. Ships have gotten longer, wider and deeper, and determining
precise water depths is imperative for safe navigation. Hurricanes play
havoc with the sea bottom, rendering the depths and obstructions on
nautical charts obsolete. Three days before Katrina hit, NOAA dispatched
four NRTs to the Gulf area, followed by one hydrographic survey ship,
one research ship temporarily outfitted with hydrographic survey
equipment, and a contract hydrographic services provider to scan the sea
bottom.

*What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

These professionals demonstrated tremendous endurance, dedication and
flexibility to obtain such substantial achievements in this
unprecedented situation. Deployed to the region abruptly, some showed
great ingenuity such as outfitting a research vessel with required
survey equipment in record time. They daily conducted meticulous and
systematic surveys searching for obstructions and shifted navigation
channels. At night they processed data and produced preliminary charting
products in extraordinarily short order for response authorities that
ultimately were used to reopen affected ports. One outstanding example
is the quick work done in the crucial ship channel for Mobile, AL that
allowed it to be cleared for vessel traffic, permitting a coal ship to
transit to an electricity generating plant that desperately needed fuel.

*What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

The survey results allowed the USCG to reopen 13 major ports and
waterways to maritime commerce and emergency relief within days after
both events.

[Section 3. Additional Information]{.underline}

*How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented deployed?*

Information from the NOAA emergency hydrographic surveys allowed the

Coast Guard to reopen all 13 major Gulf ports and waterways within days
after the hurricanes struck. This nation is heavily dependent on
maritime trade, much of which flows through the impacted ports in
Louisiana, Texas, Alabama and Mississippi. They are heavily linked to
this nation's petroleum, grain and farm products, fruit, poultry,
coffee, chemical and steel trades.  The Port of New Orleans is the focal
point for waterborne transportation of cargo to 28 states and supported
\$37 billion in economic benefits to the country.

*What is the short-term impact (1-2) years of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or the Department's mission?*

The USCG recognized NOAA on November 15, 2005 for "exceptionally
meritorious service from August 29 to September 17 while serving on the
Hurricane Katrina Waterways Survey and Reconstitution Team." In response
to the hurricane's catastrophic effects, the maritime industry, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE), USCG and NOAA devised a safe, orderly,
and systematic plan for reopening the waterways of southeast Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Alabama, ensuring that vital cargo could be delivered
safely and efficiently to nationally important facilities along the Gulf
Coast.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?*

NOAA hydrographic expertise was deployed in advance of the hurricanes'
landfall, ensuring that emergency surveys would be conducted as soon as
possible after the hurricanes hit. NOAA personnel's dedication and
tireless efforts provided a superlative level of customer service to all
the partners above, helping them accomplish their missions, and serving
the people of the Gulf Coast.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in the science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?* No.

*What is the long-term impact (3-5) years of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or the Department's mission?*

NOAA's hydrographic capabilities are essential to the future recovery of
these ports by ensuring that accurate navigation products and
information are available for the mariners transiting in and out of
these economically critical ports.

# **LCDR Douglas Baird Group**

# **NOS**

## Nomination #42

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Response

  -------------- ------------------ ---------------- --------------- -------------
  **Full Name**  **Pronunciation\   **Line or\       **Position\     **Past
                 of Name**          Staff Office**   Title\          Awards**
                                                     and Grade**     

  LCDR Douglas                      National Ocean   Chief,           
  Baird                             Service\         Operations\     
                                    Office of Coast  HSD             
                                    Survey                           

  LT Holly       Dee-Hart           National Ocean   NOAA Corp        
  DeHart                            Service\                         
                                    Office of Coast                  
                                    Survey                           

  Christopher E.                    National Ocean   Physical         
  Hare                              Service\         Scientist\      
                                    Office of Coast  GS-12           
                                    Survey                           

  LCDR Todd      Hawpt              National Ocean   NOAA Corp        
  Haupt                             Service\                         
                                    Office of Coast                  
                                    Survey                           

  Janice L.                         National Ocean   Phys. Science    
  Landsfeld                         Service\         Tech\           
                                    Office of Coast  GS-7            
                                    Survey                           

  Edwin L.                          National Ocean   Chief, Cust.\   2001 Bronze
  Martin                            Service\         Affairs Br.\    Medal
                                    Office of Coast  GS-14           
                                    Survey                           

  Jeremy C.                         National Ocean   Physical         
  McHugh                            Service\         Scientist\      
                                    Office of Coast  GS-9            
                                    Survey                           

  Michael C.                        National Ocean   Lead            2002 Bronze
  Riddle                            Service\         Cartographer\   Medal
                                    Office of Coast  GS-13           
                                    Survey                           

  LTJG Jasper    Share              National Ocean   NOAA Corp       2005 Bronze
  Schaer                            Service\                         Medal
                                    Office of Coast                  
                                    Survey                           

  LT Charles                        National Ocean   NOAA Corp        
  Yoos                              Service\                         
                                    Office of Coast                  
                                    Survey                           
  -------------- ------------------ ---------------- --------------- -------------

**Organizations:** NOAA/NOS Office of Coast Survey (OCS)

***[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}***

NOAA conducted immediate emergency hydrographic surveys that enabled the
Coast Guard to reopen all 13 major economically-vital Gulf ports and
waterways within days after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita struck.

***[Certificate Citation]{.underline}:*** For providing survey
logistical support critical to the rapid reopening of 13
economically-vital Gulf ports after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita struck.

**Nominated By:** Kathryn L. Ries

Deputy Director

NOAA/NOS-Office of Coast Survey

II. ***[Justification]{.underline}***

[Section 1. Definitions]{.underline}

Hydrographic survey---A survey of a water area, with particular
reference to submarine relief and any adjacent land.

Hydrography---The science that deals with the measurement and
description of the physical features of the oceans and adjoining coastal
areas, with particular reference to their use for navigational purposes.

Nautical chart---A special purpose map generally designed for purposes
of navigation.

Navigation Response Teams (NRTs)---Three person, mobile emergency
response teams that are deployed in emergencies as requested by federal,
state and local governments/port authorities. They have trailerable
small survey launches equipped with side scan sonar to survey waterways
for wrecked vessels and oil rigs, large debris, and shoaling that can
damage or ground passing vessels.

OCS---Office of Coast Survey, NOAA's National Ocean Service

USCG---United States Coast Guard

[Section 2. Award Justification]{.underline}

*What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?*

These activities directly support both the DOC strategic goal to
"provide the information and tools to maximize U.S. competitiveness and
enable economic growth" and the related NOAA goal to "support the
nation's commerce with information for safe, efficient and
environmentally sound transportation." Essential to the movement of food
and relief supplies, the Gulf ports and waterways are also vital to the
transport of oil and coal.

*What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?*

Waterways had to be surveyed and cleared before vessels could safely
transit the area. Ships have gotten longer, wider and deeper, and
determining precise water depths is imperative for safe navigation.
Hurricanes play havoc with the sea bottom, rendering the depths and
obstructions on nautical charts obsolete. Three days before Katrina hit,
NOAA dispatched four NRTs to the Gulf area, along with one hydrographic
survey ship, one research ship temporarily outfitted with hydrographic
survey equipment, and a contract hydrographic services provider to scan
the sea bottom.

*What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

The nominees worked tirelessly behind the scenes to ensure that
emergency hydrographic survey field units had clear destinations,
identified logistical and technical support, and succinct project goals.
They handled the numerous, constantly changing survey requests with
poise and good humor, and very quickly generated multiple project
instructions for many field units, permitting them to concentrate on
getting to the affected ports and conduct their clearance surveys to
open ship channels. Some relieved exausted first responders in the field
at personal sacrifice and others made substantial contributions to
interagency joint operation field centers. NOAA\'s navigation response
simply would not have gone as smoothly without their extra effort -- nor
would the region have received emergency supplies as fast.

*What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

The survey results allowed the USCG to reopen 13 major ports and
waterways to maritime commerce and emergency relief within days after
both events.

[Section 3. Additional Information]{.underline}

*How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented deployed?*

Information from the NOAA emergency hydrographic surveys allowed the

Coast Guard to reopen all 13 major Gulf ports and waterways within days
after the hurricanes struck. This nation is heavily dependent on
maritime trade, much of which flows through the impacted ports in
Louisiana, Texas, Alabama and Mississippi. They are heavily linked to
this nation's petroleum, grain and farm products, fruit, poultry,
coffee, chemical and steel trades.  The Port of New Orleans is the focal
point for waterborne transportation of cargo to 28 states and supported
\$37 billion in economic benefits to the country.

*What is the short-term impact (1-2) years of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or the Department's mission?*

The USCG recognized NOAA on November 15, 2005 for "exceptionally
meritorious service from August 29 to September 17 while serving on the
Hurricane Katrina Waterways Survey and Reconstitution Team." In response
to the hurricane's catastrophic effects, the maritime industry, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE), USCG and NOAA devised a safe, orderly,
and systematic plan for reopening the waterways of southeast Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Alabama, ensuring that vital cargo could be delivered
safely and efficiently to nationally important facilities along the Gulf
Coast.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?*

NOAA hydrographic expertise was deployed in advance of the hurricanes'
landfall, ensuring that emergency surveys would be conducted as soon as
possible after the hurricanes hit. The complexity of the related
logistics under such disastrous conditions required extensive
coordination with USCG, COE, Navy, FEMA, and state and local
governments. NOAA personnel's dedication and tireless efforts provided a
superlative level of customer service to all these partners, helping
them accomplish their missions, and serving the people of the Gulf
Coast.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in the science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?* No.

*What is the long-term impact (3-5) years of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or the Department's mission?*

NOAA's hydrographic capabilities are essential to the future recovery of
these ports by ensuring that accurate navigation products and
information are available for the mariners transiting in and out of
these economically critical ports.

**Alison Hammer Group**

**NOS**

**Nomination #43**

**NOAA Restoration Day**

**List of Nominees:**

+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| **Nominee      | *     | **Position       | *    | **Past Awards**  |
| Name**         | *Line | Title**          | *Gra |                  |
|                | Off   |                  | de** |                  |
|                | ice** |                  |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Alison Hammer  | NOS   | Physical         | G    | NOAA Employee of |
|                |       | Scientist        | S-13 | the Month (9/04) |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Peter          | NMFS  | Fisheries        | ZP-4 |                  |
| Bergstrom      |       | Biologist        |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Rich Takacs    | NMFS  | Fisheries        | ZP-4 |                  |
|                |       | Biologist        |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| John Collins   | NMFS  | Marine Habitat   | ZP-3 | Silver Award     |
|                |       | Specialist       |      | (2004) Chalk     |
|                |       |                  |      | Point Oil Spill  |
|                |       |                  |      | assessment;      |
|                |       |                  |      |                  |
|                |       |                  |      | Bronze Award     |
|                |       |                  |      | (2005) NOAA      |
|                |       |                  |      | Heritage Week    |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Jill Bieri     | NMFS  | Educational      | ZA-3 |                  |
|                |       | Coordinator      |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Michelle Fox   | NMFS  | Outreach         | ZA-4 |                  |
| Burnett        |       | Coordinator      |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Steve Giordano | NMFS  | Fisheries        | ZP-4 |                  |
|                |       | Biologist        |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Paula Jasinski | NMFS  | Fisheries        | ZP   |                  |
|                |       | Biologist        | -3/4 |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+
| Peyton         | NOS   | Deputy Director, | G    |                  |
| Robertson      |       | NOAA Chesapeake  | S-14 |                  |
|                |       | Bay Office       |      |                  |
+----------------+-------+------------------+------+------------------+

*Two contractors also played key roles on this team:*

> *Rebecca Newhall, NOS/Special Projects*
>
> *Walter Priest, NMFS/NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office.*

**Nominator's Name:** Dan Farrow, Chief, Special Projects, Management
and Budget Office, NOAA's National Ocean Service

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?** (200 characters)

Since 2004 the team has led an annual event where more than NOAA
employees volunteer in the field to restore critical coastal habitat in
the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.

**I.** [**Certificate Citation Text** (150
characters):](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)

For developing, organizing and implementing the annual NOAA Restoration
Day, where over 100 NOAA staff volunteer to help restore the Chesapeake
Bay.

**II. Program Booklet Text**: *Not applicable for Bronze Metals*

**III. Justification**

> **Section 1 -- Definitions** *Not applicable*
>
> **Section 2 - Award Justification** *(Maximum number of characters for
> all four questions in this section cannot exceed 2000)*

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

> NOAA Restoration Day provides an opportunity for agency staff to do
> fieldwork to help restore wetland and underwater grass habitat in the
> Chesapeake Bay. The event supports the NOAA Strategic Plan goal to
> protect, restore, and manage the use of coastal and ocean resources
> through an ecosystem approach. It also supports cross-cutting
> priorities for outreach and education. It helps build staff morale and
> embodies the "One-NOAA" philosophy by allowing staff from all Line
> Offices to work together to support a common mission.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> The event was conceived and executed through staff initiative. It
> addresses the challenge of restoring critical coastal habitats in the
> Bay and supports the agency's coastal stewardship ethic and commitment
> to restoration. The event continues to grow in size and popularity;
> participation is voluntary and all NOAA Line Offices are represented.
> Both the organizers' initiative and the volunteers' participation
> exemplify the NOAA spirit of public service and stewardship.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> The project began in 2004 through a staff-initiated partnership
> between NOS and NMFS. It utilizes in-house scientific expertise,
> existing partnerships, and NOAA staff, and supports an ongoing
> restoration project. The team planned, coordinated, and led all
> aspects of the event for the past three years. Their work includes
> site selection, activity planning, volunteer and partner coordination,
> media relations, and Website development.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

> In 2006, the effort was expanded into two events with over 200
> volunteers and 30 school students. Activities included planting 100
> trays of underwater grasses grown in NOAA offices, seeding an oyster
> reef with 100 bags of native oysters, planting 1,400 wetland plugs and
> 200 marsh shrubs, and removing 555 pounds of marine debris. In
> addition to these tangible ecosystem results, since 2004 over 350 NOAA
> staff members have been provided with a field experience that exposes
> them to NOAA restoration science.
>
> **Section 3 - Additional Information** *(Maximum number of characters
> for all six questions in this section cannot exceed 2000)*

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

> This is an ongoing event that began in 2004. Each year the event takes
> approximately 6 months to plan from December to June. There have been
> three events to date, all at different locations, which increase the
> planning complexity.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

> The event provides an opportunity for NOAA employees to put the
> mission they support in their office work into action and to
> demonstrate their commitment to restoration and protection of the Bay
> through volunteerism. There is much information sharing and an
> increased understanding of NOAA programs and office structure by the
> NOAA staff and leaders who participate, which enhance NOAA's mission
> goals and exemplify the "One-NOAA" spirit.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

> Each year the event grows in popularity and complexity. In 2000, NOS
> started growing Bay grass in tanks in 3 offices. By 2006, more than 40
> tanks were located across NOAA and at local schools. The long-term
> impact is that participants have a better understanding of NOAA
> restoration science and interact with more people within their agency.
> Volunteers are also more aware of the issues impacting the Chesapeake
> Bay and steps they can take to make a difference.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

> Yes, this event affects all of NOAA and is a good example of a
> "One-NOAA" activity since it allows staff to work together outside of
> their Line Office affiliations on a single goal in support of NOAA's
> coastal restoration mission. Participants represent all NOAA line
> offices (in Silver Spring and Virginia) and Bay grass is also grown by
> all Line Offices. In 2005, the local CBS affiliate (Channel 9) also
> grew and planted Bay grass and covered the story on the evening news,
> reaching thousands of viewers.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

> This project's real impact comes from promoting volunteerism and
> increasing understanding of Bay issues among NOAA staff, students,
> partners and the public.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

> Yes, NOAA Restoration Day is an opportunity for NOAA leaders and
> employees to work side by side, demonstrating their commitment to
> science, customer service, and stewardship.

**Brent Ache Group**

**NOS**

**Nomination #44**

**NOAA Support to the Gulf of Mexico Alliance**

**Nominator**

**Margaret Davidson**

Director, NOAA Coastal Services Center

NOAA Co-Chair, Federal Workgroup supporting the Gulf of Mexico Alliance

**Nominees**

**Brent Ache**

National Ocean Service

Physical Scientist

GS-13

Past Awards:

-   Bronze Medal, NOAA Program, Planning, and Integration, 2005

-   Bronze Medal, EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 2004

**Rebecca J. Allee, Ph.D.\
**National Marine Fisheries Service\
Program Manager\
GS-14\
Past Awards:

-   Administrator\'s Award, 2004

**Miles M. Croom**

National Marine Fisheries Service

Assistant Regional Administrator for Habitat Conservation

Demo Pay Band V\
Past Awards:

-   Bronze Medal, National Marine Fisheries Service, 2006 (Group)

-   NOAA Employee of the Year (NMFS), 2005

-   Bronze Medal, National Marine Fisheries Service, 2001 (Individual)

**Dan Farrow**

National Ocean Service

Chief, Special Projects Division

GS-15

Past Awards:

-   Bronze Medal, NOAA Program, Planning, and Integration, 2005

**Mary Virginia Hinchcliff**

National Ocean Service

Supervisory Coastal Program Coordinator

GS-15\
Past Awards:

-   Bronze Medal, Coastal Training Program, 2004

-   Bronze Medal, Project Design and Evaluation, 2004

**Heidi Recksiek\
**National Ocean Service

Coastal Management Specialist

GS-13

Past Awards: None

**Wendy Sera\
**National Ocean Service

Technical Writer/Editor

GS-12

Past Awards: None

While the individuals listed below are not currently Federal Employees,
I would like to recognize the critical contributions of the following
contractors and Knauss Sea Grant Fellows to the success and significance
of this accomplishment:

-   Brie Bierman, IM Systems Group contract employee to National Ocean
    Service

-   Juliette Finzi, 2006 Knauss Sea Grant Fellow with National Ocean
    Service

-   Christy Loper, 2005 Knauss Sea Grant Fellow and current RSIS
    contract employee to National Ocean Service

-   Laurie Rounds, JHT, Inc. contract employee to National Ocean Service

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**

Achieving a directive in the President's U.S. Ocean Action Plan, the
nominees substantially supported the development of a regional ecosystem
action plan signed by all five U.S. Gulf State Governors.

**[Certificate
Citation](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)**

For extraordinary support to the five U.S. Gulf of Mexico States in the
development of the *Governors' Action Plan for Healthy and Resilient
Coasts.*

**Justification**

**Section 1 - Definitions**

Alliance The Gulf of Mexico Alliance: A partnership among the five U.S.
Gulf States (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas) with the
goal of significantly increasing regional collaboration to enhance the
environmental and economic health of the Gulf of Mexico

CEQ The President's Council on Environmental Quality

FWG The Federal Workgroup: Thirteen federal agencies providing support
to the Gulf of Mexico Alliance at the request of the Council on
Environmental Quality, brought together under the coordination of U.S.
EPA and NOAA

USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

USOAP The U.S. Ocean Action Plan: Released in December 2004, the
President's response to the U.S. Ocean Commission on Ocean Policy's
report, [*An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st
Century*](http://www.oceancommission.gov/documents/full_color_rpt/welcome.html)

**Section 2 - Award Justification**

*What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?*

In December 2004, the USOAP called for a partnership to increase the
integration of resources and expertise to address regional environmental
issues in the five U.S. Gulf States. NOAA's participation in this
partnership directly achieves one of its four mission goals
(ecosystems), and demonstrates NOAA leadership in advancing regional
ecosystem management -- a larger goal of the coastal and ocean
management community, a key NOAA constituency.

*What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?*

CEQ requested NOAA and USEPA to co-chair federal support. NOAA
coordinated a diverse suite of federal partner capabilities and
maximized the impact of federal resources on state-identified regional
priorities. The nominees diligently and creatively engaged federal
partners, yet carefully maintained a clear supporting role to the Gulf
States--no small challenge in an emerging partnership of multiple states
and federal agencies. The nominees also overcame the challenge of
sustaining focus and momentum on the Alliance partnership through the
2005 hurricane season.

*What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

Under tight deadlines, the nominees (1) overcame longstanding political
hurdles to a true regional partnership among the Gulf States and engaged
all five Gulf State Governors in the Alliance; (2) compiled and authored
the Alliance's *Governors' Action Plan*, resulting in a concise
statement of action signed by the five Governors and the CEQ Chairman;
(3) documented resources and commitments of 12 federal agencies and
publicly released them in a companion document to the *Plan*; and (4)
led seven public workshops to solicit citizen input.

*What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

The nominees united, for the first time, the political leadership in all
five Gulf States in an effective, ecosystem-based restoration
partnership for the Gulf of Mexico. The *Governors' Action Plan* is the
foundation for, and provides a functional "laboratory" for, an
innovative ecosystem approach to regional coastal resource management.
Another innovation is the *Implementation Activities Matrix*, which
specifies resource commitments from federal agencies in response to
regional needs identified by the Alliance.

**Section 3 - Additional Information**

*How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?*

CEQ charged NOAA to support the Alliance in April 2005. The *Governors'
Action Plan* was delivered in March 2006. NOAA overcame significant
disruptions from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in fall 2005.

*What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?*

NOAA's ecosystems mission goal strives to advance an ecosystem approach
to management to attain healthy coastal ecosystems and develop informed
public stewards. NOAA's leadership in the Alliance provides an
on-the-ground opportunity for the agency to apply and test its
principles over the three-year implementation period of the *Governors'
Action Plan* (March 2006 to March 2009).

*What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?*

The President's new ocean governance structure recognizes the Alliance
as a solid working model of regional ecosystem management, and has
charged NOAA and USEPA to identify comprehensive lessons learned to be
shared with other regions.

*Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?*

From NOAA's perspective, the Alliance is both a state-federal
partnership and an experimental federal partnership in which federal
agencies are listening to state-identified needs and integrating their
response to them. Implementing the *Governors' Action Plan* over the
next three years will significantly enhance working relationships among
federal agencies fulfilling their missions in the Gulf of Mexico.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?*

A Web portal now in development will provide access to federal and state
sea-grass habitat data to support both local and regional management
decisions.

*Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how? *

The Alliance and the *Governors' Action Plan* represent an innovative
experiment to create regional partnerships that can more effectively
address locally identified priorities. With a solid political foundation
provided by comprehensive support for the *Governors' Action Plan*, the
Alliance model maximizes the impact of the federal response by
identifying program integrations and delivering innovative solutions.
Only through the dedication and efforts of the nominees has the Alliance
reached its current potential to enhance the environmental and economic
health of the Gulf of Mexico.

**Daniel Farrow Group**

**NOS**

**Nomination #45**

NOAA Development and Production of the U.S. Marine Managed Area
Inventory

**Nominees**

Daniel R.G. Farrow

National Ocean Service

Chief, Special Projects

GS-15

Past Awards: Bronze Medal, NOAA Program, Planning, and Integration, 2005

Lani M. Watson

National Ocean Service

Management Analyst

GS-13

Past Awards: None

Chris Clement

National Ocean Service

Physical Scientist

GS-13

Past Awards: None

Joel Murray

National Ocean Service

Physical Scientist

GS-12

Past Awards: None

Jonathan Kelsey

National Ocean Service

National System Development Coordinator

GS-14

Past Awards: None

Charles Wahle

National Ocean Service

Director, Science Institute, MPA Center

GS-14

Past Awards: None

Rafael V. Lopez

National Marine Fisheries Service

Habitat Protection Program Specialist\
Paybanding Band IV (GS-14)\
Past Awards:\
Unusually Outstanding Performance Award: 1990\
Bronze Awards (Organizational):  1995, 2001

Carli Bertrand

National Marine Fisheries Service

Marine Policy Advisor

ZP3

Past Awards: None

**Nominator**

Joseph Uravitch

Director

Marine Protected Areas Center, NOS, NOAA

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?** *(200 character
limit)*

The Marine Managed Areas (MMA) Inventory, the nation's first
comprehensive database of federal, state and territorial MMAs, is the
foundation for the National System of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).

**[Certificate
Citation](http://www.wfm.noaa.gov/awards/admin_award/cert_citation.html)**
*(150 character limit)*

For developing the Marine Managed Areas Inventory, a state-of-the-art
tool to access valuable information about the nation's marine managed
areas.

**Justification**

**Section 1 - Definitions**

-   Marine Protected Area (MPA): Any area of the marine environment that
    has been reserved by federal, state, territorial, tribal or local
    laws or regulations to provide lasting protection to the natural and
    cultural resources therein.

-   Marine Managed Area (MMA): A broader term for marine protected areas
    used for building the MMA Inventory; may include protection of
    geological, cultural, or recreational resources that may not fall
    under the official U.S. definition of MPAs.

-   DOC: U.S. Department of Commerce

-   DOI: U.S. Department of the Interior

-   Data fields: Each type of data being collected for the MMA
    Inventory.

**Section 2 - Award Justification** *(2,000 character limit)*

What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?

The MMA Inventory was developed to inform agencies, stakeholders and the
public of the locations and characteristics of marine managed areas in
U.S. waters, and to provide the information necessary to develop and
implement a National System of MPAs for the nation.

*What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?*

In 2000, Executive Order (EO) 13158 directed DOC and DOI to protect
significant natural and cultural resources within the marine environment
of the United States, including the Great Lakes, by developing a
scientifically based comprehensive National System of MPAs. A key
purpose of the EO is to ''enhance the conservation of our nation's
natural and cultural marine heritage and the ecologically and
economically sustainable use of the marine environment for future
generations.'' A first step in developing the MPA system was to take an
inventory of marine managed areas to provide the basis for understanding
the extent and function of existing spatially based marine management
efforts.

*What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

NOAA and DOI worked together for over 5 years to design and build the
MMA Inventory. MMA criteria were proposed in the *Federal Register* in
2003, and made final in 2005 after an extended public comment period.

The data collection process began with the MPA programs of federal
agencies and 35 states and territories identifying their sites that met
the MMA criteria. The data, collected with the assistance of an
innovative student internship program, was entered into a secure
website. Once checked and approved by the managing agencies, the data
was published on the web.

*What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

The MMA inventory is the only comprehensive database of its type. It
provides a valuable resource for agencies, stakeholders and the public.
It includes approximately 1,500 marine areas managed by either federal
or state agencies implementing over 100 federal and state laws. With 40
data fields, each site listing provides a wide range of information. The
inventory is available on the web and provides tools with which users
can create their own queries to sort the data and make maps.

**Section 3 - Additional Information** (2,000 character limit)

*How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?*

The MMA Inventory was completed in 5 years, with initial development
beginning in May 2000 and the last phase of data launched on the public
website in January 2006. It took 3 years to design, build and refine the
database and mapping tool.

What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

The Inventory forms the pool of sites from which the first phase of the
national system of MPAs will be developed in 2007/08. The MPA system
will enhance the protection of the nation's natural and cultural
resources by coordinating the hundreds of protected areas and
authorities listed in the Inventory.

What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

The Inventory will continue to serve as a foundation for the MPA system
as federal, state, tribal and local marine managers build regional MPA
networks to improve efficiency and effectiveness.

Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other Federal
agencies? If so, how?

The Inventory provides critical data to federal agencies that use or
manage waters in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone, including the Great
Lakes. These include DOI, DOC, the Departments of Defense, State, and
Transportation, the U.S. Agency for International Development,
Environmental Protection Agency, and National Science Foundation.
Recently, the Inventory was the U.S. contribution to the worldwide MPA
database being developed by the World Conservation Union.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?

The Inventory is the only comprehensive database of the nation's MMAs.
It is a valuable resource for agencies, stakeholders, and the public,
who can access vast amounts of information with user-friendly tools via
the web. State-of-the-art technology was used to provide an interactive
capability for users to sort and map the data.

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how? 

The Inventory's technical aspects make the data more accessible to the
public and more effective for resource managers. The Inventory already
is being used by states (e.g., New Jersey, Virginia) to assist in
integrated land and water resource planning, and by Navy contractors
developing environmental assessments and impact statements to conduct
national defense activities.

**John Christensen**

**NOS**

**Nomination #46**

**Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Biogeographic Assessment**

**1. Full Names of Nominees**

John D. Christensen                \
Randy D. Clark                      \
Sarah Fangman                       \
Chris T. Mobley                     \
Mark E. Monaco                    \
Michael R. Murray                 \
Benedict J. Waltenberger

**2. Major Line and Staff Office for Each Nominee**

NOAA Ocean Service\
National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science\
Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment\
John D. Christensen, Randy D. Clark, Mark E. Monaco\
\
NOAA Ocean Service\
National Marine Sanctuary Program\
Channel Island National Marine Sanctuary\
Sarah Fangman, Chris T. Mobley, Michael R. Murray, Ben J. Waltenberger\
\
**3. Position, Title, and Grade for Each Nominee**\
\
John D. Christensen                  Marine Biologist          GS-14\
Randy D. Clark                        Marine Biologist           GS-12\
Sarah Fangman               Research Coordinator GS-12\
Chris T. Mobley                       Sanctuary Manager       GS-14\
Mark E. Monaco                      Marine Biologist           GS-15\
Michael R. Murray                   Program Specialist        GS-12\
Benedict J. Waltenberger          Physical Scientist          GS-13\
\
**4. Past Awards for Each Nominee**

John D. Christensen -- 2005 NOS Employee of the Year\
Mark E. Monaco -- 2002 NOS Employee of the Year\
\
**5. Nominator's Name, Line, and Staff Office**

Dr. Gary C. Matlock, Director\
NOAA Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?**\
\
The group developed an innovative management tool as part of a
biogeographic assessment of the Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary to support the sanctuary's management plan revision.\
 \
**I. Certificate Text**\
\
For developing a quantitative biogeographic assessment of the Channel
Islands National Marine Sanctuary to support management plan revisions.

**III. Justification**\
\
**Section 1 -- Definitions**\
\
*Biogeography:* The study of the geographic distribution of species.\
\
*Biogeographic assessment:* A process to define and characterize the
ecological linkages and spatial and temporal distributions of species.\
\
*CINMS:* Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary\
\
*Ecological benefit:* Calculated as an increase in an ecological metric
(e.g., number of species) for the total areas associated with each
boundary alternative.\
\
*Optimal Area Index:* An index that represents the relative increase or
decrease in an ecological metric (e.g., species abundance) for a
boundary alternative relative to the existing area of the CINMS.\
 \
**Section 2 -- Award Justification**\
\
**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**\
\
DOC Goal 3 states that we shall "Observe, protect and manage the Earth's
resources to promote environmental stewardship." The uncommon
leadership, dedication and commitment to conducting sound science
exhibited by the team address these goals and represent the very spirit
of these organizational tenets. The team's efforts have been critical to
defining the biogeography of the CINMS and surrounding area to evaluate
potential boundary expansion alternatives of the sanctuary.\
\
**What was the context in which the nominee(s) addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**\
\
NOAA leadership requested a sound scientific investigation to be
conducted at the CINMS to explore 6 potential boundary expansion
alternatives of the sanctuary.  This requirement was derived from public
feedback during the management plan revision process. Results of the
study enabled a quantitative evaluation of the ecological benefit of the
6 alternatives.\
\
**What specific actions did the nominee(s) take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**\
\
The nominees and partners developed an innovative management tool as
part of a biogeographic assessment of the CINMS region that included
integrating information on the distribution of habitats and associated
species to assess ecological benefits of boundary alternative
scenarios.  This required compiling, analyzing, and integrating a large
amount of ecological data in a short period of time for marine habitats
and faunal groups to define geographic areas with high ecological
benefit based on several metrics.\
\
**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**\
\
The study quantitatively defined the Channel Islands region as an
important ecosystem supporting a diverse array of biological
communities. Results of this assessment defined which of the 6 boundary
concepts ranked highest in ecological benefit. The highest-ranked
concepts incorporated large areas of the coastal mainland. Those with
the greatest ecological benefit were characterized by high nutrient
supply, dynamic surface currents, and persistent thermal fronts. They
also include large areas of important habitats such as kelp, sea grass,
and wetlands.

**Section 3 -- Additional Information**\
\
**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the\
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**\
\
The team's effort was initiated through planning and coordination with
Federal and State partners during the late fall of 2003. The tasks
outlined in the resulting project work plan were initially addressed in
the winter of 2004, and the final biogeographic assessment report and
digital map products were published in November 2005.\
\
**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
Bureau and/or Department's mission?**\
\
A report and associated digital data files developed from this effort
were provided to managers and stakeholders in the region to assist in
the discussion of potential expansion of the CINMS. This assessment
complements ongoing CINMS efforts to define socioeconomic
characteristics of the region. The products from the work also support
NOAA and its state partners in addressing ongoing discussions on the
development of a framework for a network of marine protected areas along
the West Coast.\
\
**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
Bureau and/or Department's mission?**\
\
Results will be integrated with additional information, such as CINMS
socioeconomic data, to support efforts exploring potential CINMS
expansion. In addition, the geospatial data and biogeographic analyses
support ongoing management of the sanctuary and provide a digital
assessment framework to update and expand information derived from both
natural and social science studies.\
\
**Does the accomplishment affect other Bureaus/Departments or other
Federal agencies?**\
\
The study supports ongoing activities of several other governmental
agencies including NOAA Fisheries, the USGS Marine Geology Program, and
the state of California Marine Life Protection Act that address state
marine protected areas.\
\
**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement of science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**\
\
Yes, the study resulted in development of a quantitative index, entitled
the Optimal Area Index that enabled evaluation and comparisons of the
ecological benefit of the six boundary alternative concepts. This unique
index serves a quantitative tool that can be used to support evaluating
proposed or current marine protected areas.\
\
**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific\
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**\
\
No; however, it is an outstanding example of a well organized,
collaborative and effective NOAA response to management of a National
Marine Sanctuary.

**Michael Weiss Group**

**NOS**

**Nomination #47**

**Pacific Crossing PC-1 Settlement Agreement**

**Nominee Information**

Michael Ian Weiss (NOS/NMSP), Deputy Director, GS 15

Carol Ann Bernthal, Superintendent (NOS/NMSP), GS 14, Past Award: NOAA
Administrator's Award, 2002

Mary Sue Brancato (NOS/NMSP), Resource Protection Specialist, GS 12

Niel B. Moeller, (GCLE), Attorney-Advisor, GS 15

Theodore M. Beuttler, (GCOS), Attorney-Advisor, GS 15

Russell W. Craig (DOC), Attorney-Advisor, GS 15

Seth Brandon Shapiro (U.S. Department of Justice) Trial Attorney, GS-15

**Nominator**

Margo Jackson, NOS/NMSP, Senior Policy Advisor

***What is the significance of this accomplishment?** (200-character
limit)*

The settlement improved the consultation process with federal and tribal
entities. It had national implications for future policymaking on the
proposed placement of fiber-optic cables in sanctuaries.

**I. CERTIFICATE CITATION** (*150-character limit)*

For superior legal and technical services in the Pacific Crossing
settlement agreement to protect Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary
resources.

**II. JUSTIFICATION**

**Section 1: Definitions**

ACOE Army Corps of Engineers

DOC Department of Commerce

DOJ Department of Justice

NMSA National Marine Sanctuaries Act

NMSP National Marine Sanctuary Program

NOAA National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

OCNMS Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary

PCL Pacific Crossing Limited

**Section 2: Award Justification**

**Specific Challenge:** To reach a settlement agreement that would
ensure the protection of OCNMS resources, uphold the Makah Tribe's
treaty rights, and address a historically permitted activity.

**Context:** In 1999, OCNMS granted a permit to PCL to install
fiber-optic cables through the OCNMS. The cables were to be buried to a
depth sufficient to prevent interactions with fishing gear and allow
recovery of the associated sea-floor communities. In 2001, surveys
revealed that the cable was improperly buried and in violation of permit
conditions, causing potential damages to sanctuary resources and posing
a safety risk to commercial and tribal fisheries.

**Action:** OCNMS began discussions with PCL to define the extent of the
problem and necessary corrective actions. Extensive and difficult
consultations occurred over the next two years, along with field
surveys. NOAA also began to prepare an enforcement case to identify
outstanding non-compliance issues and legal claims should negotiations
fail.

PCL filed for bankruptcy and NOAA and DOC attorneys initiated claims in
bankruptcy courts to ensure that permit conditions, remediation actions
and outstanding permit fees would be addressed. DOJ led the effort to
reach a settlement agreement. NOAA coordinated the involvement of staff
from the ACOE as they permitted the laying of the cable and invited the
Makah Tribe to represent its concerns in settlement discussions. Team
members operated under extreme pressure and intense deadlines, and made
difficult technical and policy decisions.

**Results:** In October 2005, a multi-party settlement agreement was
signed that resolved complicated permitting, financial, and treaty
fishing rights claims arising from an improperly installed submarine
fiber-optic cable within the OCNMS. This agreement allowed for cable
reinstallation with improved standards for resource protection; a Makah
settlement with PCL for lost fishing opportunity; and PCL emerging from
bankruptcy.

**Section 3: Additional Information**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?**

It took four years to identify the scope of the problem, convince the
cable owner of its responsibility, and reach a settlement agreement
involving the cable owner and installer, two federal agencies, and the
Makah Tribe. NOAA has approved the remediation plan, and reinstallation
of the cable will begin in August 2006.

**What are the impacts of this accomplishment on the Department's
mission?**

Resolution of this issue supports the NOAA goal to "manage coastal and
ocean resources to optimize benefits to the environment, the economy,
and public safety." It also supports the stated policies of the NMSA to
"facilitate to the extent compatible with the primary objective of
resource protection, all private and public uses of the resources of
these marine areas not prohibited pursuant to other authorities." This
case set precedence for enforcing permit conditions and reinforced that
all permittees are accountable for permit requirements designed to
protect sanctuaries. The case also shaped the development of all future
cable-permitting policies, establishing a long-lasting benefit to all
sanctuaries.

**Does the accomplishment affect other Departments or Agencies?**

The ACOE and the Makah Tribe were intimately involved in negotiations
but relied on NOAA to take the lead in most technical discussions and in
formulating legal strategies. The ACOE now has better understanding and
awareness of the issues associated with the placement of fiber-optic
cables in sanctuaries. A stronger working relationship with both the
Makah and ACOE has emerged, and the parties have identified ways to
improve permit decision-making in OCNMS.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in customer
service or administrative support?**

The settlement process established a new standard for consultation
involving Native American tribes. Because the case involved the usual
and accustomed fishing grounds for the Makah Tribe, it was intimately
involved in the settlement negotiations, and the tribe's perspective
helped shape the final terms of the settlement agreement. With NOAA's
support, the Makah Tribe was successful in winning financial
compensation for lost fishing opportunity.

**Jean Durosko Group**

**NOS**

**Nomination #48**

**(Originally submitted as Silver nomination; revised and voted as
Bronze by post-NIAB virtual vote)**

**NO NEED TO READ AND RATE**

**1. Full Name of Nominees:**

Jean V. Durosko (pronounced Jean Der-os-ko)

B. William Gottholm (pronounced Bernie Gott-holm)

Earl J. Lewis (pronounced Earl Lewis)

> Richard A. Meitzler (pronounced Richard Metz-ler)

**2. Type of Recognition:**

U.S. Department of Commerce Bronze Medal

**3. Category:**\
Leadership

**4. Major Line or Staff Office of Nominees:**

Jean V. Durosko -- NOAA Ocean Service (NOS)

B. William Gottholm --NOAA Ocean Service (NOS)

Earl J. Lewis -- NOAA Ocean Service (NOS)

Richard A. Meitzler -- NOAA Ocean Service (NOS)

**5. Position Title and Grade for Nominees:**

Jean V. Durosko -- Management Analyst, GS-13

B. William Gottholm - Oceanographer, GS-14

Earl J. Lewis -- Research Fisheries Biologist, GS-13

> Richard A. Meitzler -- Environmental Safety and Health Officer, GS-12

**6. Past Awards for Nominees:**

None

**7. Nominator's Name and Major Line or Staff Office:\
** Dr. Gary C. Matlock - NOS

Director, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)

**8. Justification:**

**What is the Significance of this Accomplishment?**

> The innovative implementation of NCCOS' EMS highlights the Department
> as a role model for other government agencies and reinforces its
> commitment to safe workplaces and environmental stewardship.

**Certificate Text:**

> For developing NOAA's first office-wide Environmental Management
> System to manage its impacts to human and ecosystem health more
> efficiently.

**Section 1 -- Definitions**

-   *CEMP -* Code of Environmental Management Principles*\
    *

-   *EMS* -- Environmental Management System

-   *EPA* -- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

-   *EO* - Executive Order

-   *NCCOS* -- NOS National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science

-   *NOAA* -- U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and
    Atmospheric Administration

-   *NOS* -- NOAA's National Ocean Service

**Section 2 -- Award Justification**

**A. What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?\
\
**The goal was to help fulfill the Department's Performance Measure of
ensuring a safe workplace for all employees (Management Integration
Goal-Achieve Organizational and Management Excellence) and NOAA's goals
of providing a safe operating environment and fostering environmental
stewardship. The EMS also needed to comply with EO 13148, EPA's CEMP,
the Department's Environmental Management Manual, and NOAA's EMS
requirements.

**B. What was the context in which the nominees addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?**

EO 13148 requires all Federal agencies to implement an EMS where
appropriate by December 31, 2005. NOAA adopted a phased approach to
implementation and selected NCCOS as one of the first organizations to
implement an EMS. Within one year, the nominees needed to implement an
EMS across NCCOS' six facilities in Maryland, South Carolina, North
Carolina, and Alaska.

**C. What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The nominees developed an on-line EMS Awareness Training Program and EMS
website to ensure that all NCCOS employees and partners understand the
purpose of the EMS and the potential environmental impacts of their
work. They also improved the EMS based on results from internal and
external audits as part of the continuous plan-do-check-act cycle,
including efforts to track performance and trends.

**D. What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Based on internal and external audits, the EMS was judged as fully
implemented with high levels of office-wide consistency, staff
awareness, continual improvement, and management involvement. The
office-wide approach and on-line training have been shared with other
NOAA and DOC offices, as well as other governmental and private
organizations to facilitate their EMS efforts. NCCOS has incorporated
the EMS into its daily operations.

**Section 3. Additional Information:**

**1. How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?\
**\
Development of the EMS began in December 2004, and was completed on
December 29, 2005 after passing internal and external audits.

**2. What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?\
**\
Through the EMS, NCCOS established processes and practices to ensure a
safe workplace for its employees and contractors, thereby helping the
Department meet its Management Integration Goal and EO 13148. These
improvements also help NOAA meet its goals of providing critical support
to the agency's mission by operating safe work environments and
fostering environmental stewardship.

**3. What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?\
**\
NCCOS has integrated environmental accountability into its long-term
planning and decision-making processes, and, as a model for other
organizations within NOAA, the Department, and other Federal agencies,
will help foster environmental stewardship across the country. NCCOS'
EMS efforts help ensure the safety and well-being of its employees and
partners, and sustain the health of the environment.

**4. Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?\
**\
Yes. NCCOS' office-wide EMS serves as an efficient model for other
organizations within the Department and other Federal agencies required
to implement such systems. In addition, the downloadable version of the
NCCOS EMS Awareness Training, developed due to numerous agency requests,
facilitates EMS development elsewhere.

**5. Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?\
**\
Yes. The on-line EMS Awareness Training resulted in a major advancement
in the automation of training. NCCOS employees and partners can easily
access the training at any location, and the system can verify which
employees have completed the training. The downloadable version makes
this training tool available to other agencies and private organizations
as well.

**6. Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative support?
If so, how?\
**\
Yes. The EMS processes and practices enable NCCOS to operate with
greater efficiency and control, and ensure that it operates safe
facilities complying with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations.

**Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary**

**NOS**

# **Nomination #49**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**1. Full name of nominee:** Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary

**2. Type of Recognition:** Bronze Medal

**4. Major Line or Staff Office:** NOS

**5. Position title & grade of each nominee**: Organization citation

**6. Past awards:** 1997 Bronze Medal

**7. Nominator's name and major line:** Daniel J. Basta, NOS

**What is the significance of the accomplishment? (200 characters):**

In 2005 the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary successfully
responded to the evacuation and recovery from 4 storms, including 3 of
the most destructive storms on record: Katrina, Rita and Wilma

**I. Certificate Text (150 characters**):

In recognition of their professional and personal response to the
hurricane impacts to the Florida Keys and the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary

**II. Program Booklet Text (350-600 characters):**

Not required for the Bronze Medal

**III. Justification**

Section 1- Definitions:

None

**Section 2 -- Award Justification (maximum 2000 characters):**

What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?

Goal 5: "Provide critical support to NOAA's mission" and Goal 1:
"Protect, restore and manage the use of coastal and ocean resources
through an ecosystem approach to management" within the Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) in response to impacts from four
hurricanes, including three of the most destructive storms on record:
Katrina, Rita & Wilma

What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?

The passage of 4 hurricanes, their impacts through the FKNMS and the
home community of the staff

What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?

FKNMS staff prepared for and recovered from the passage and impacts of 4
hurricanes during the 2005 Hurricane Season. Each storm required the
preparation and securing of offices, equipment, vessels and vehicles.
Each storm also required the preparation and securing of personal
property and the evacuation of staff and families. Staff each returned
to duty as quickly as possible to repair, replace, and restore damaged
infrastructure or resources as needed. In each storm, staff consistently
placed their professional duties & communities' needs ahead of personal
ones in an effort to ensure the FKNMS mission and goals could continue
to be achieved as a first priority

What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?

First and foremost, all staff members were accounted for before and
after each storm and no one was injured. Second, due to staff
preparation efforts there were: no government vehicles damaged or
destroyed, no critical records or equipment lost due to storm surge
flooding and only 5 of 30 government vessels were damaged -- 4 minimally
and 1 moderately. Third, within 2 weeks following each storm initial
surveys of natural and cultural resources were initiated and critical
field infrastructure was assessed and repairs initiated as needed. And
fourth, staff provided essential post storm assessment and recovery aid
to local, state and federal agencies and to their co-workers, neighbors
and communities. FKNMS staff has remained positive and dedicated to the
mission of the Sanctuary and the health of their community despite many
personal storm related impacts and losses.

**Section 3 -- Additional Information (maximum 2000 characters):**

How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/deployed?

The hurricane season(s) response is on-going but the majority of the
work was accomplished in the first 2-3 months following the passage of
the final storm (Wilma) of the 2005 season

What is the short-term impact (1-2 yrs) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

The FKNMS staff has protected critical NOAA infrastructure and natural
and cultural resources. Staff has shown their local, state and federal
partners their dedication to their mission and their community. This has
already resulted in improved coordination among local partners and
recognition from community groups

What is the long-term impact (3-5 yrs) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?

These efforts will likely bring better long-range planning and disaster
preparation and coordination for the FKNMS, the National Marine
Sanctuary Program and the federal agencies in the region

Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other Federal
agencies? If so, how?

FKNMS provided, and continues to provide, operational support for site
recovery and clean up operations for the Department of Interior Florida
Keys based National Parks and Wildlife Refuges. Without our assistance
these entities would have faced significant logistical challenges on
emergency facility repairs and debris removal

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?

No

Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?

Yes. It ensured the ability of the FKNMS to accomplish its mission,
perform as a good partner to other Federal and state agencies in the
area, and participate as role models to the community

Following each storm, especially Hurricane Wilma, FKNMS staff went to
help their neighbors and communities begin the recovery. Examples
include clearing debris, fueling and running generators, and checking in
on elderly neighbors; forming neighborhood teams to assess and repair
localized damage; and volunteering to provide daycare for kids who's
normal daycare center was damaged by the storm so that the other parents
could help restore the center back to operational status.

#### Janice Goldman Group

**OAR**

**Nomination #50**

# NOAA-EPA Golden Jubilee Team

**Individuals in the Nominated Group**

**Janice Goldman: OPCIA (Public Affairs Specialist, GS-13)**

**Patricia McGhee: OAR/ARL/ASMD (Secretary, ZS-IV)**

**Evelyn Poole-Kober: OAR/ARL/ASMD (Librarian, ZA-III)**

**Nominated by**: Richard S. Artz

> Acting Director

Air Resources Laboratory

Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research

***What is the significance of this accomplishment?* (Response 200
characters):** The Team's hard work, enthusiasm, and diligent
coordination with political and scientific leaders resulted in the
successful commemoration of the 50-year partnership between NOAA and EPA
in conducting air quality research.

## Certificate Citation (Response 150 characters): For facilitating the NOAA-EPA Golden Jubilee Symposium and associated events to commemorate the 50 years of the interagency partnership.

##### Section 1. Definitions 

##### Department of Commerce (DOC)

##### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

##### Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

##### American Meteorological Society (AMS)

##### 

##### Section 2. Award Justification (Response 2,000 characters) 

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?**

Given the scientific challenges and data needs for air quality modeling,
collaboration between NOAA and EPA is essential to build credible air
quality models and tools. Hence, NOAA scientists have been developing
air quality models and tools in partnership with EPA for their use in
making national and state-level policies for improving the Nation's air
quality. These models and tools are widely used both domestically and
internationally for designing cost-effective emission control programs
to achieve clean air and for providing air quality forecast guidance to
issue health advisory warnings to the public.

*What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal, challenge
or problem?*

A group from DOC, NOAA and EPA conceived the idea of the Golden Jubilee
Symposium to commemorate the 50^th^ anniversary of the collaboration
between NOAA and EPA on air pollution meteorology and air quality
modeling and its applications. The nominated team facilitated the
NOAA-EPA Golden Jubilee Symposium that was conducted by AMS in 2005.
This Symposium was well attended by the national and international
scientific community, congressional representatives and many high-level
officials from NOAA and EPA, marking the significance of this major
milestone.

***What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?***

Jana Goldman worked with congressional staff and NOAA leadership,
including the Assistant Secretary of Commerce and NOAA Deputy
Administrator and Senator Elizabeth Dole's staff director. She was
responsible for coordinating the luncheon keynote address given by Dr.
James Mahoney and providing a briefing to a congressional staffer on the
topic. Patricia McGhee handled the many day-to-day activities associated
with this complex event, including the coordination of domestic and
international travel, welcoming visitors, compiling and distributing
materials, ensuring presentations were loaded, and interacting with
nearly every individual that attended the Jubilee. Evelyn Poole-Kober
conducted extensive research of the 50-year history between NOAA, EPA
and the predecessor Agencies. Based on this research, she developed and
gave a well-received, historically significant presentation.

***What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?***

More than 250 top-level scientists and decision makers from this country
and abroad participated in this Symposium. The Symposium strengthened
our visibility and position in the scientific community and revitalized
the partnership between NOAA and EPA.

### 

### Section 3. Additional Information 

***How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?   When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?***

> The idea of the Golden Jubilee Symposium was conceived in 2003 and the
> Team to assist the program chairperson was created in early 2004.
> Working closely with the AMS, the technical program was designed and
> several invited speakers from the US and abroad were identified in
> fall 2004 for participation in the NOAA-EPA Golden Jubilee Symposium
> in September 2005.
>
> ***What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
> the bureau and/or Department's mission?** *

The NOAA-EPA air quality forecast advisories are being used by the
public to take appropriate mitigation measures to reduce exposure to
high levels of air pollutant levels. Also, emission control programs,
costing billions of dollars, are being based on the models jointly
developed by NOAA and EPA. All papers presented at the Golden Jubilee
Symposium will be published in a special issue of AMS's Journal of
Applied Meteorology and Climatology, subject to the journal's normal
peer review process, thereby enhancing the stature and recognition for
the research work performed by NOAA researchers.

***What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?***

The 50-year long research collaboration between NOAA and EPA together
with the Golden Jubilee Symposium will help maintain the research
partnership in the future. Also, it will help bring EPA resources to
more effectively advance NOAA's research mission. NOAA's air quality
models will, in turn, enable managers throughout the world to make
better environmental decisions, and provide more refined, timely and
accurate health advisory warnings to the public.

***Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies?  If so, how?***

Yes. The output from NOAA's air quality models provide long-term data
and information products for the EPA, the states, Centers for Disease
Control, National Park Service, and other federal agencies for
addressing air quality issues.

***Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation?  If so, how?***

No.

***Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
support?  If so, how?***

The recognition by OMB and congressional representatives of interagency
collaboration to achieve results in a timely and cost- effective manner
should help NOAA in achieving its research mission.

**OFFICE OF OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH NOMINATIONS**

**Mark Brown Group**

**OAR**

**Nomination #51**

**Planning Team for the Headquarters/Boulder Transition**

Mark E. Brown

Patricia Hathaway

Elizabeth A. Hess

Nancy Huang

Paul Johnson

Kristin Koch

Deborah Martin

Sharon Schroeder

2.  **Staff or Line Office for each Nominee:** All are NOAA Research
    (OAR)

3.  **Position title and grade for each nominee**

Mark E. Brown, Chief Financial Officer/CAO, SES

Patricia Hathaway, Program Analyst, ZA-IV, PPE

> Elizabeth A. Hess, Retired (former Director, MOD, ZA-V)

Nancy Huang, Chief Information Officer, ZA-V

Paul Johnson, Supervisory Budget Analyst, ZA-IV

Kristin Koch, Science Policy Advisor, ZA-V (former Acting Director, PPE)

Deborah Martin, Management Analyst, ZA-IV

Sharon Schroeder, Director, Program Policy Division, ZA-V

4.  **Past Awards (1998-2005)**

> Mark E. Brown
>
> Patricia Hathaway
>
> Elizabeth A. Hess (2003 Group Admin. Award, OAR Employee of the Year
> -- 2003,
>
> NOAA Award 2005)
>
> Nancy Huang (Special Recognition -- 2002, Spectrum Achievement --
> 2003,
>
> Bronze -- 2003, Best practice 2003, 2002)
>
> Paul Johnson
>
> Kristin Koch (Bronze 2005, Admin Award 2003)
>
> Deborah Martin
>
> Sharon Schroeder

5.  **Nominator's Name and Staff or Line Office**

> Richard W. Spinrad, Ph.D.
>
> OAR Assistant Administrator
>
> \(301\) 713-2458 ext. 141
>
> <Richard.Spinrad@noaa.gov>

6.  **Certificate Citation** For administrative planning, management and
    implementation of the OAR Headquarter reorganization in Silver
    Spring, MD and consolidation of six laboratories in Boulder, CO.

7.  **What is the significance of this accomplishment**? (200 characters
    max.) he reorganization of OAR HQ and consolidation of the six
    Boulder, CO labs was accomplished by redirecting existing resources
    with no disruption to research, while meeting all the milestones.

    I.  ***Definitions***

AL -- Aeronomy Laboratory

ARL/SRRB -- Air Resources Laboratory / Surface Radiation Research Branch

CDC -- Climate Diagnostic Center

CMDL -- Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory

CSD -- ESLR's Chemical Sciences Division

DOC -- Department of Commerce

DOD -- Department of Defense

DOE -- Department of Energy

EPA -- Environmental Protection Agency

ESRL -- Earth System Research Laboratory

ETL -- Environmental Technology Laboratory

FSL -- Forecast Systems Laboratory\
FTE -- Full Time Equivalent (i.e. a civil service personnel billet)

GMD -- ESRL's Global Monitoring Division

GSD -- ESRL's Global Systems Division

HTT -- Headquarters Planning Team for Boulder Transition

NASA -- National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NEC -- NOAA Executive Council

NEP -- NOAA Executive Panel

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NRRT -- NOAA Research Review Team

OAR -- Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research

OPM -- Office of Personnel Management

PSD -- ESRL's Physical Sciences Division

SAB -- Science Advisory Board

WFM -- Work Force Management (formerly Human Resources)

II. ***Award Justification (2000 characters max.)***

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan? The smooth transition of so
many people and organizations with such a long and proud history in such
a short period of time.** The challenge for the Headquarters Transition
Team was to implement the changes in the December 2004 Report to the
Appropriations Committees to strengthen NOAA research. This immense
undertaking was completed within 12 months. The HQ Transition Team
established the following three new offices in Silver Spring, MD: the
Office of Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes L&CI) to address the
recommendation to create a single authority for managing OAR's research;
a Communications Staff to communicate the results of our research and
coordinate two-way external communications to and from various audiences
of interest; and the Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (PP&E) to
strengthen OAR's transition of research to operations and information
services. The HQ Transition Team was responsible for planning, managing
and implementing the recommendation to consolidate the Boulder
Laboratories in such a way as to promote scientific integration, without
disruption to the already productive scientific endeavors of the Boulder
Research Labs. The six OAR research entities in Boulder (AL, ARL/SRRB,
CDC, CMDL, ETL, and FSL) were consolidated into a unified administrative
structure for greater fiscal and managerial efficiency and to provide
coordinated scientific direction and oversight. This challenge was
successfully accomplished with both the OAR HQ reorganization and new
Earth System Research Laboratory beginning operations on October 1,
2005, smoothly transitioning 650 federal employees, contractors and
affiliates

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?** While continuing to fulfill their regular job
duties, the Headquarter Transition Team members met frequently,
conducted conference calls, and traveled to Boulder several times to
work with staff there, over the period of one year, to insure all
budgetary, information technology, and administrative actions necessary
to implement the planned HQ Silver Spring, MD reorganization and
Boulder, CO consolidation of the six research organizations were
identified and monitored from initiation through completion.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?** Under the leadership of Mark Brown the
Headquarter Transition Team identified all financial, information
technology, human resource, organizational, and management issues
affecting the consolidation efforts.  Mark Brown directed the
Headquarter effort to shape the required reprogramming to comply with
the NOAA, DOC and OMB Congressional Request requirements in a timely
manner, which allowed the reorganization to begin on October 1, 2005.
The HQ Transition Team members each took responsibility for the issues
associated with their functional expertise and worked them through to
completion.  Actions were taken to identify and successfully reprogram
the financial and budgetary resources involved to insure the appropriate
resources ended where they were needed.  The project plan developed
during this process was then monitored to insure any problems
encountered were minimal and mitigation strategies were identified and
implemented to keep the project on schedule.  The required package of
required documentation was developed and shepherded through to approval
and implementation.  This included modifications to all affected,
revised mission statements, crosswalks of affected employees and billets
from the old to new organizations, coordination of personnel actions
required to affect the new organizational structure and staff
realignments.  In addition, all changes were made to the NOAA financial
systems that allowed for timely implementation of the HQ reorganization
and the new ESRL Laboratory.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?** On October 1, 2005, the HQ OAR reorganization and
new Earth System Research Laboratory commenced operations with an
appropriated budget of \$80M and 650 federal employees, contractors, and
affiliates.  Considering the complexity of the transitions, the
reorganization and consolidation went very smoothly, disruptions were
minimal, financial and information technology systems were up and
running, and overall employee satisfaction with the process was high.

III. ***Additional Information (2000 characters max.)***

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?** The
Headquarters Planning Team for the Boulder Transition began its work in
August, 2004, and completed its work when the OAR HQ reorganization and
new Earth System Research Laboratory became operational on October 1,
2005.

**What is the short term impact of the accomplishment on the
Department's mission?** The HQ reorganization will strengthen the NOAA
and OAR management of its research. The formation of ESRL enables NOAA
to more economically coordinate its research efforts in Boulder,
Colorado and to undertake a more integrated, multidisciplinary approach
to solving complex scientific and technical problems related to the NOAA
mission, with a special emphasis of the effective transition of research
to operations.

**What is the long term impact of the accomplishment on the Department's
mission?** The HQ reorganization and formation of the new Earth System
Research Laboratory will likely serve as a model of how the rest of OAR
and, indeed, research throughout the rest of NOAA, could be better
organized to deal with the many scientific challenges that increasingly
rely on multidisciplinary expertise to address adequately.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science or
technology?** Although this accomplishment did not result in a major
advancement in science or technology at this time, it prevented major
disruption of world-class science and provided a better opportunity for
future advancements through better management and organization.

**NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE NOMINATIONS**

**Bill Knight**

**NWS**

**Nomination #52**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Individual

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** Bill Knight

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** NITE

**Title**: Senior Watchstander

**Series and Grade:** GS-1301-14

**Complete office address:** NOAA/West Coast-Alaska Tsunami Warning
Center

> 910 South Felton Street
>
> Palmer, AK 99645

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** None.

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass.

**7. Nominator:** Laura Furgione, Director

NOAA/National Weather Service Alaska Region Headquarters

222 West 7^th^ Ave., #23

Anchorage, AK 99513-7575

Telephone: (907) 271-5136

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Mr. Knight's oceanographic modeling efforts, in addition to his normal
duties as a senior watchstanding scientist, enabled the development of a
tsunami warning service for the U.S. east and Gulf of Mexico coasts.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For outstanding service in the development and refinement of the tsunami
warning system along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

WC/ATWC: West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center

WCM: NWS Warning Coordination Meteorologist

Tsunami travel time: The time it takes for a tsunami to travel from the
point of origination to a coastal location.

Tsunami amplitude: The difference between the high point of a tsunami
and the normal sea level.

NOAA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS: NOAA's National Weather Service

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department\'s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Mr. Knight's exemplary effort directly supports the NOAA/NWS goal of
*Working Together to Save Lives* and the mission for *The Protection of
Life and Property.* His efforts are also an example of meeting the DOC
General Goal/Objective 3.1, *Advance understanding and predict changes
in the Earth's environment to meet America's economic, social, and
environmental needs*.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?**

The Indian Ocean tsunami tragedy highlighted the need for all coastal
areas to be covered by a robust, responsive tsunami warning system. In
the weeks immediately following the tragic tsunami, the WC/ATWC
aggressively expanded their watch coverage to include the U.S. Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico coasts. During this period of frenetic activity in
the tsunami warning system, Mr. Knight's regular duties as a senior
watchstanding scientist were greater than ever. He eagerly addressed the
oceanographic problems associated with initiating a tsunami warning
system for a new area, and provided information critical to system\'s
rapid development.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Tsunami travel time prediction and tsunami hazard area identification
are key elements of a tsunami warning system. Sensing the need for an
expanded system, Mr. Knight extended the Center's travel time
computation method from the Pacific to the Atlantic, and created the
software needed to predict tsunami travel times along the east and Gulf
coasts. He collaborated with oceanographers to refine existing tsunami
modeling techniques, performed tests using Indian Ocean tsunami
observational data, and applied the methods to quantify the tsunami
hazard along the east and Gulf coasts.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Mr. Knight's computation of the Atlantic tsunami travel times allowed
the WC/ATWC to quickly initiate a tsunami warning service for the U.S.
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts. Second, his numerical hazard
assessment gave WCMs and emergency management officials along those
coasts the first quantitative estimates of maximum tsunami wave heights
from distant events, allowing the WC/ATWC to restrict warnings to
coastal areas with the highest threat.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Mr. Knight's tsunami travel time development was performed between
January and March, 2005 and the full Atlantic tsunami warning system was
implemented in April, 2005. From March 2005 through early 2006, Mr.
Knight, in collaboration with scientists at the University of Alaska,
Fairbanks, refined the oceanographic models used to forecast tsunami
wave heights, verified the models using the Indian Ocean tsunami as a
case study, and produced hazard analyses for the east Atlantic and Gulf
coasts. WC/ATWC procedures were refined based upon Mr. Knight's work in
January, 2006, and the hazard studies were presented to WCMs and
published in March through May 2006.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

A fully functional tsunami warning system for the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf
coasts has been implemented and tsunami warnings for this area can be
tailored based on a reasonable analysis of threat, restricting the
length of coastline placed in a tsunami warning.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

NOAA's NWS WCMs have quantitative values on which to base tsunami
planning. This is critical along the east and Gulf coast since there is
very little tsunami history in those regions.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

NOAA's ability to provide tsunami warnings to the east and Gulf coasts
is critical to many others whose mission entails protecting life and
property, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S.
Geological Survey, and state and local emergency management officials.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Improvements to WC/ATWC tsunami forecasting techniques were necessary to
produce accurate predictions for the east and Gulf coasts. These
predictions were the first available for hazard planning in the region.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

Providing east and Gulf coast WCMs and emergency managers with
worst-case wave height predictions is a major advancement over the
present knowledge base. The predictions are the basis for tsunami
planning at the state and local levels and are greatly appreciated by
WC/ATWC customers.

**Christine Alex Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #53**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination; NIAB decided on
need to cull other LO/COs for additional FEMA voluteers)**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Names of Nominees: See Listing at End of Nomination**

**5. Other NOAA/DOC Awards: See Listing at End of Nomination**

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass for all.

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Dennis McCarthy, Director

NOAA/NWS Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services

1325 East-West Highway, W/OS, Silver Spring, MD 20910

Telephone: (301) 713-0700

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The nominees voluntarily deployed to assist FEMA with post-storm
disaster relief for multiple hurricanes in 2005 and provided the highest
level of customer service in extremely difficult conditions.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For voluntary and exemplarily customer service provided during FEMA
post-disaster relief operations for multiple hurricane strikes in 2005.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

DOC Department of Commerce

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS NOAA's National Weather Service

U.S. United States of America

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Department of Commerce Goal #3: Observe, protect, and manage the Earth's
resources to promote environmental stewardship.

-   **What was the context in which the nominees addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

During 2005, Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma, among others, struck
the U.S. Gulf Coast, causing widespread catastrophic damage on an unseen
level. Heeding the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) call for
volunteers to help with massive post-storm disaster relief and recovery
efforts, the nominees and their duty offices made significant sacrifices
to be deployed on a few days notice for a minimum 30-day (and often
times longer) deployment to FEMA.

-   **What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Nominees received two days of pre-deployment training from FEMA before
receiving their field assignments. Then, along with volunteers from
other federal agencies, they fanned out across the southeastern U.S. to
set up Disaster Recovery Centers, working directly with people impacted
to register them with FEMA to receive assistance. Other tasks included
distributing bottled water, non-perishable food, and bags of ice;
surveying damaged communities with emergency managers; coordinating
delivery of travel trailers to evacuees as temporary housing in or near
their home communities, distributing questionnaires and doing data entry
in a FEMA project designed to identify the needs of people living in
hotels and shelters months after the storms. Volunteers worked with
part-time FEMA hires (Disaster Assistance Employees); volunteer
firefighters; and local emergency management staff or volunteers, with
little to no on-site support from permanent full-time FEMA employees. In
these situations, volunteers stepped up as the de facto leader(s) of
their teams in the field. The contributions made by volunteers far
exceeded FEMA's expectations.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Actions by these volunteers were directly responsible for assisting the
millions of people across the Gulf Coast affected by these storms in
finding necessary government resources to begin the long and arduous
task of rebuilding their lives and communities.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

FEMA distributed a call for federal volunteers in early September 2005.
Deployments ended in December 2005.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau**

**and/or Department=s mission?**

The volunteers' service helped people and communities impacted by these
storms to begin the long process of rebuilding. Their service also
helped to ease tensions by some of the people impacted of a perceived
slow government response to the disaster.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The valuable work performed during this effort will result in increased
credibility and trust in Commerce and the Federal Government through
their hard work and extreme dedication to the residents and communities
impacted.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The volunteers worked together with volunteers from across the Federal
government during this effort, assisting the coordinated federal
response to these disasters.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

During the FEMA deployment, volunteers participated in pilot projects
designed to identify and track the needs of people impacted by the
storm, including arranging alternative housing and helping to satisfy
personal and family needs. These projects will likely be used in future
post-storm disaster recovery efforts.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

The service-above-self efforts of the nominees and their duty offices
demonstrated the highest level of customer service and support possible
within the Federal government. It reaffirmed the commitment NOAA has to
faithfully serving the American public.

**NOAA employees/nominees who were deployed for FEMA post-disaster
relief/response to Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma:**

**[NOAA/National Weather Service (NWS)]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Christine (Chris) Alex

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation: AL** ex

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services

1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910

**Past Awards:** 1996- DOC Bronze Medal

**Name of Nominee:** Milan Allen

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: AL** len

**Title**: Hydrologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1315-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center\
> 1735 Lake Drive W., Chanhassen, MN 55317

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Jason Anderson

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: AND** er sun

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-12

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Grand Forks, ND Weather Forecast Office
>
> 4797 Technology Circle, Grand Forks, ND 58203-0600

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Sam Bowman

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: BOW** mun

**Title**: Senior Facilities Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-802-11

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Aberdeen, SD Weather Forecast Office
>
> 824 Brown County 14 South, Aberdeen, SD 57401-9311

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Maria ("Loly") Brandes

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation: BRAN** des

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade:** GS-2210-12

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

Office of the Chief Information Officer

1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Cathy Burgdorf

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation: BURG** doorf

**Title**: Program Assistant **Series and Grade:** GS-303-5

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> National Weather Service Training Center
>
> 7220 N.W. 101st Terrace, Kansas City, MO 64153

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Steve Flood

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: FLOOD**

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> [National Centers for Environmental
> Prediction](http://www.ncep.noaa.gov/)\
> Hydrometeorological Prediction Center\
> 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746

**Past Awards:** Gold Medal 2000 for Hurricane Floyd\
Gold Medal 1993 for the Great March Blizzard\
Silver Medal 2005 for the winter of 2004-2005\
Bronze Medal 2001 for outstanding service\
Bronze Medal 2004 for Hurricane Isabel

**Name of Nominee:** Jerry Griffin

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: GRIF** fin

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> National Weather Service Training Center
>
> 7220 N.W. 101st Terrace, Kansas City, MO 64153

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Lee Hobart

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: HO** bart

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade:** GS-2210-9

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Alaska Region Headquarters
>
> 222 West 7th Avenue #23, Anchorage, AK 99513-7575

**Past Awards:** 2005 Silver medal -- office award

**Name of Nominee:** Jane Hollingsworth

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation: HALL** ings worth

**Title**: Meteorologist-in-Charge **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Reno Weather Forecast Office
>
> 2350 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512-3900

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** John Janowiak

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: JA know e ak**

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> [National Centers for Environmental
> Prediction](http://www.ncep.noaa.gov/)\
> Climate Prediction Center\
> 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746

**Past Awards:** 2005 Gold Medal -- Office Award

2004 Silver Medal -- Office Award

> 2000 Bronze Medal -- Group Award
>
> 1997 Gold Medal -- Group Award
>
> 1998 Bronze Medal -- Group Award

**Name of Nominee:** Michael Khuat

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** KWAT

**Title**: Information Technology Officer **Series and Grade:**
GS-2210-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> San Diego Weather Forecast Office\
> 11440 W. Bernardo Court, Suite 230, San Diego, CA 92127

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Lewis Kozlowsky

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: KOZ** low ski

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services
>
> 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** *Victoria Langholz RETIRED*

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** Lang hols

**Title**: Administrative Support Assistant **Series and Grade:**
GS-303-7

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Denver/Boulder Weather Forecast Office
>
> 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305-3328

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** John Lord

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: LORD**

**Title**: Budget Database Design Specialist **Series and Grade:**
GS-2210-14

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

> 1325 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Andrew Lutz

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: LUTZ**

**Title**: Information Technology Officer **Series and Grade:**
GS-2210-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Pueblo, CO Weather Forecast Office
>
> 3 Eaton Way, Pueblo, CO 81001-7326

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Michael Nadolski

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: NA Doll ski**

**Title**: Observation Program Leader **Series and Grade:** GS-1341-12

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Paducah, KY Weather Forecast Office
>
> 8250 Kentucky Highway 3520, West Paducah, KY 42086-9762

**Past Awards: All are office awards for severe weather performance:**

> Silver Medal (Organization) - 2000
>
> Bronze Medal (Organization) - 2003
>
> Gold Medal (Organization) - 2003
>
> Silver Medal (Organization) - 2005

**Name of Nominee:** Jon Petry

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** P Tree

**Title**: Electronics Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-856-11

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Northern Indiana Weather Forecast Office
>
> 7506 E 850 N, Syracuse, IN 46567

**Past Awards:** Gold Medal (Organization) -- 2002 for severe weather
performance

> Silver Medal (Organization) -- 2005 for winter weather performance

**Name of Nominee:** Roy Queen

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: QUEEN**

**Title**: Electronics Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-856-12

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> National Weather Service Training Center
>
> 7220 N.W. 101st Terrace, Kansas City, MO 64153

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Gregory Smith

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: SMITH**

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Detroit/Pontiac, MI Weather Forecast Office
>
> 9200 White Lake Road, White Lake, MI 48386

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** *William Tallman* **(*note:* *died during
pre-deployment FEMA training ***

> ***in Atlanta*)**

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: TALL man**

**Title**: *Meteorologist-In-Charge* **Series and Grade:** *GS-1340-14*

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Aberdeen, SD Weather Forecast Office
>
> 824 Brown County 14 South, Aberdeen, SD 57401-9311

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** John Taylor

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: TAY lur**

**Title**: Senior Forecaster **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Northern Indiana Weather Forecast Office
>
> 7506 E 850 N, Syracuse, IN 46567

**Past Awards:** Gold Medal (Organization) -- 2002 for severe weather
performance

> Silver Medal (Organization) -- 2005 for winter weather performance

**Name of Nominee:** Toby Tenharmsel

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: ten harm sel**

**Title**: Information Technology Officer **Series and Grade:**
GS-2210-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Duluth, MN Weather Forecast Office
>
> 5027 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811-1442

**Past Awards:** Gold Medal (Organization) -- 2002 for severe weather
performance

**Name of Nominee:** Michael L. Thompson

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: TOMP son**

**Title**: Electronics Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-856-11

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

National Reconditioning Center

1520 E. Bannister Road, Kansas City, MO 64131-3009

**Past Awards**: None

**Name of Nominee:** Kirsten Elson (note: was Willman at time of
deployment -- now married)

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation: EL son**

**Title**: Meteorologist **Series and Grade:** GS-1340-12

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Portland Weather Forecast Office\
> 5241 NE 122nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97230-1089

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Larry Wirth

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: Wer-th**

**Title**: Hydrometeorological Technician **Series and Grade:**
GS-1341-11

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Hastings, NE Weather Forecast Office
>
> 6365 North Osborne Drive West, Hastings, NE 68901-9163

**Past Awards:** Bronze Medal (Office Award) - 2004

**Name of Nominee:** William Snyder

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: SNI-der**

**Title**: Information Technology Officer **Series and Grade:**
GS-2210-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Pocatello Weather Forecast Office
>
> 1945 Beechcraft Avenue, Pocatello, ID 83204

**Past Awards:** 2002 Isaac Cline Award -- Team Award

**Name of Nominee:** Robert Sumpter

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation: SUMP-ter**

**Title**: Electronics Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-856-11

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service

> Spokane Weather Forecast Office\
> 2601 N. Rambo Road, Spokane, WA 99224

**Past Awards:**

**[NOAA/National Environmental Satellite Dissemination and Information
Service (NESDIS):]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Steve Ansari

**Salutation:**

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Physical Scientist **Series and Grade: ZP-1301-03**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, E/CC11

151 Patton Ave, Federal Building, Room 420

Asheville, NC 28801-5001

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Terry Babb

**Salutation:**

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Physical Scientist Technician **Series and Grade:
ZT-1311-04**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NESDIS, E/SO12

5200 Auth Road, Building FB4, Room 0135

Suitland, MD 20746-4304

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Phillip (Phil) Johnson

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Physical Scientist Technician **Series and Grade:
ZT-1311-04**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NESDIS, E/SO11

5200 Auth Road, Building FB4, Room 0251

Suitland, MD 20746-4304

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Linda Salyers

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Administrative Assistant **Series and Grade: ZS-0318-03**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NESDIS, E/OC4

1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Room 2433

Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Benjamin Watkins

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Supervisory Physical Scientist **Series and Grade:
ZP-1301-05**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, E/CC3

151 Patton Ave, Federal Building, Room 468D

Asheville, NC 28801-5001

**Past Awards:**

**[NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Susan Boring

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** sue bore ing

**Title**: Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-482-03

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/SWR3

650 Capitol Mall, Room 8-300

Sacramento, CA 95814

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Bill Bradley

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Brad lee

**Title**: Fisheries Infrastructure Team Leader **Series and Grade:**
ZP-334-04

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, Office of the CIO

> 1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3
>
> Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Erik Braun

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Bra-On

**Title**: Fishery Reporting Specialist **Series and Grade:** ZA-1101-3

**Complete Office Address:** NMFS, F/NERx2

62 Newtown Lane, Room 203

E. Hampton, NY 11937

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Allen Butner

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Permit Assistant **Series and Grade:** ZS-303-4

**Complete Office Address:** NMFS, F/AKRx4

P.O. BOX 21668

Juneau, AK 99802-1668

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Alfred (Bubba) Cook

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation**: as written

**Title**: Fish Management Specialist **Series and Grade: ZP-0401-03**

**Complete Office Address:** NMFS, F/AKR2

P.O. BOX 21668

Juneau, AK 99802-1668

**Past Awards:** Bronze Medal 2005

**Name of Nominee:** Daniel (Dan) Decker

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** dek er

**Title**: Biological Technician **Series and Grade: GS-0404-06**

**Complete Office Address:** NMFS, F/AKC3

7600 Sand Point Way, NE, Bldg 4, Room 1072

Seattle, WA 98115-6349

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Dan Foy, Jr.

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Fisheries Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-482-3

**Complete Office Address:** NMFS, F/AKC2

7600 Sand Point Way, NE, Bldg 1

Seattle, WA 98115-6349

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Dawn Golden

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** goal den

**Title**: Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-3

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/PIR3

1601 Kapiolani Blvd, Suite 1101

Honolulu, HI 96814-4700

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Joseph (John) Gorman

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Management & Program Analysis Officer **Series and Grade:
ZA-0343-05**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/AKR1

P.O. Box 21668

Juneau, AK 99802-1668

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Sean Hayes

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** shawn haze

**Title**: Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-3

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/SWC5

110 Shaffer Road, Building SWC3

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Richard (Dick) Ledgerwood

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Supervisory Research Fisheries Biologist **Series and
Grade:** ZP-0482-4

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, Point Adams Research Station

520 Heceta Place

Hammond, OR 97121-0155

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Juan Levesque

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** levek

**Title**: Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** GS-0482-11

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/SER3, Protected Resources
Division

263 13^th^ Avenue South

St. Petersburg, FL 33701

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Joseph Brian O'Gorman

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** o gore mun

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade: GS-2210-12**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/AKC2

301 Research Court, Room 225

Kodiak, AK 99615-7400

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** James (Jim) Peacock

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Visual Information Specialist **Series and Grade:**
GS-1084-11

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS

2725 Montlake Road East

Seattle, WA 98112-2097

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Pam Polmateer

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** palm a teer

**Title**: Budget Analyst **Series and Grade: GS-0560-12**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS

Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 6013

14th & Constitution Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20230-0001

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Brad Ryan

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Research Fisheries Biologist **Series and Grade:** GS-0482-12

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, Pasco Research Station

3305 E. Commerce Street

Pasco, WA 99301-5839

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Penny Smith

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Administrative Support Assistant **Series and Grade:**
GS-0303-7

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, Pasco Research Station

3305 E Commerce Street

Pasco, WA 99301-5839

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Russell (Rusty) Swafford

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** swaw-ferd

**Title**: Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** GS-0482-13

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, Habitat Conservation Division

4700 Avenue U

Galveston, TX 77551

**Past Awards:** DOC Bronze Medal (group) - 2005

**Name of Nominee:** Anne Tedrick

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** Ted-rick

**Title**: Management and Program Analysis Officer **Series and Grade:**
ZA-0343-5

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/NER1

1 Blackburn Drive

Gloucester, MA 01930-2298

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** LCDR Stephen (Steve) Thumm

**Salutation:** LCDR

**Pronunciation:** thumb

**Title**: Associate Administrator **Series and Grade:** LCDR/O-4

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/PIR

1601 Kapiolani Blvd, Suite 1101

Honolulu, HI 96814-4700

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Michael (Mike) Tork

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Research Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-3

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/NEC31

166 Water Street, Room 106

Woods Hole, MA 02543

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Teresa Turk

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Fisheries Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-4

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/ST4

> 1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Room 12317
>
> Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Timothy (Tim) Sheehan

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Research Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-3

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/NEC41

166 Water Street, Room COTT

Woods Hole, MA 02543

**Past Awards:** 2004 NMFS Employee of the Year Award for
Management/Science/Technology

**Name of Nominee:** Joseph (Joe) Orsi

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Research Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade: ZP-0482-03**

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/AKC4

11305 Glacier Hwy, Room 259

Juneau, AK 99801-8626

**Past Awards:**

**Name of Nominee:** Christina (Kristy) Fellas

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-401-2

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/NWR4

1201 NE Lloyd Blvd

Portland, OR 97232-1274

**Past Awards:** NMFS Employee of the Year 2005

**Name of Nominee:** Heidi Fish

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-2

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/SWC5

110 Shaffer Road, Building SWC3

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Mukhya Khalsa

**Salutation:**

**Pronunciation:** Moo-key-ah Kalsa

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade**: ZP-2210-3

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/AKRx4

P.O. Box 21668

Juneau, AK 99802-1668

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Michael Henderson

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Title**: Program Analyst **Series and Grade:** GS-0343-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, Southeast Regional Office

263 13^th^ Avenue South, Room 224

St. Petersburg, FL 33701

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Stephanie (Stephie) Bost

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** stephie boast

**Title**: Program Support Assistant **Series and Grade:** GS-303-9

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, F/MB

> 1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Room 14336
>
> Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Rance Morrison

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Fishery Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-482-3

**Complete Office Address:** DOC, NOAA, NMFS, AKR, Sustainable Fisheries
Division

> P.O. Box 92055
>
> Dutch Harbor, AK 99692

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Patrick R. Williams

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** will-yums

**Title**: Fisheries Biologist **Series and Grade:** GS-0428-12

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS, c/o LSU

> South Stadium Road
>
> Military Science Building, Room 266
>
> Baton Rouge, LA 70803

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** *David Sutherland (note: retired from government
service as of 4/1/06; home address available if needed)*

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:**

**Title**: Fisheries Biologist Manager **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-03

**Old Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS/Office of Science and
Technology

325 Broadway, Building DSRC

Boulder, CO 80305-3328

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Layne Bolen

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Lane Bow len

**Title**: Fisheries Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-03

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS/Office of Protected Resources

1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3

Silver Spring, MD 20910-3283

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Philip Hoffman

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation**: Fill ip Hoff man

**Title**: Fisheries Biologist **Series and Grade:** ZP-0482-01

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMFS/Office of Protected Resources

1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3

Silver Spring, MD 20910-3283

**Past Awards:** None

**[NOAA/Office of Atmospheric Research (OAR)]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Cathleen (Cathy) Darnell

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** Dar-nell

**Title**: WRI Edit **Series and Grade:** GS-1082-12

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OAR, R/GLERL

2205 Commonwealth Blvd

Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2945

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Steven (Steve) J. Ennis

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** en-nis

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade:** ZP-2210-3

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OAR, R/GSD

325 Broadway, Building DSRC, Room 2B307

Boulder, CO 80305-3328

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Michael McCormick

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** mick-cormick

**Title**: Physical Scientist **Series and Grade:** GS-1301-13

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OAR, R/GLERL

2205 Commonwealth Blvd

Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2945

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Derrick Snowden

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation: Snow-den**

**Title**: Physical Scientist **Series and Grade**: ZP-1301-03

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OAR, R/AOML

4301 Rickenbacker Causeway

Miami, FL 33149-1026

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Sam Williams

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** WILL yums

**Title**: Program Support Assistant **Series and Grade:** GS-0303-8

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OAR, R/OGP

1100 Wayne Avenue

Silver Spring, MD 20910-5603

**Past Awards:** None

**[USEC/Corporate Offices]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Richard (Rich) Fales

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Fails

**Title**: Grants Management Specialist **Series and Grade:** GS-1101-11

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OFA, OFA621

> 1325 East-West Highway, SSMC2, Room 9304
>
> Silver Spring, MD 20910-3283

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Lisa Lasfargues

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** LASS Far Gues

**Title**: IT Specialist **Series and Grade:** GS-2210-13

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OFA, OFA121

1221-D Caraway Court, Building ITC5

Largo, MD 20774-5381

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Chester Madej

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Ma-ditch

**Title**: Supply Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-2005-06

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OFA, MC411

325 Broadway, Building BWY-1, Room W-22

Boulder, CO 80305-3328

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Barry S. Meyer

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** My Er

**Title**: Management Analyst **Series and Grade:** GS-0343-15

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/OFA, CC

601 East 12^th^ Street, Federal Building, Room 1736

Kansas City, MO 64106-2877

**Past Awards:** None

**[NOAA/National Ocean Service (NOS)]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Christopher (Chris) Parish

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Pare ish

**Title**: Engineering Technician **Series and Grade:** GS-0802-11

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NOS, Center for Operational
Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) N/OPS2

1305 East-West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910

**Past Awards:** None

**[NOAA/National Marine and Aviation Operations (NMAO)]{.underline}**

**Name of Nominee:** Michele Clark

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** As written

**Title**: File Assistant **Series and Grade:** GS-305-7

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMAO, M02

1801 Fairview Avenue East

Seattle, WA 98102-3767

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Gregory Raymond

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Ray Mund

**Title**: Military Personnel Management Specialist **Series and
Grade:** GS-201-11

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMAO, CPC 1

1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Room 12136

Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282

**Past Awards:** None

**Name of Nominee:** Dennis Shields

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** As written

**Title**: Lead IT Specialist **Series and Grade:** GS-2210-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA/NMAO, NMAO2

1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, Room 12147

Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282

**Past Awards:** None

**Ken Haydu Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #54**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**4. Name of Nominees:**

Salutation: Mr. Ken Haydu

Pronunciation: HAY-dew

Title: Meteorologist-in-Charge (MIC)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-15

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

1901 S. State Route 134

Wilmington, OH. 45177

Salutation: Mr. Ray Fagen

Pronunciation: FAY-gen

Title: Meteorologist-in-Charge (MIC)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-14

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

2500 Challenger Drive

Midland, TX. 79706

Salutation: Mr. Bill Lawrence

Pronunciation: LOR-rence

Title: Development & Operations Hydrologist (DOW)

Series & Grade: GS-1315 Grade GS-14

Complete Address: NWS Arkansas-Red Basin River Forecast Office

10159 East 11^th^ St., Suite 300

Tulsa, OK. 74128-3050

Salutation: Mr. Bill Read

Pronunciation: REED

Title: Meteorologist-in-Charge (MIC)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-15

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

1353 FM 646 W, Suite 202

Dickinson, TX. 77539

Salutation: Mr. Jesse Haro

Pronunciation: HA-row

Title: Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-14

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

20 South Vermillion

Brownsville, TX. 78521-5798

Salutation: Mr. John Schmidt

Pronunciation: SHMIT

Title: Senior Hydrologic Forecaster

Series & Grade: GS-1315 Grade GS-13

Complete Address: NWS Arkansas-Red Basin River Forecast Office

10159 East 11^th^ St., Suite 300

Tulsa, OK. 74128-3050

Salutation: Mr. Jim Lushine

Pronunciation: Lu-SHEEN

Title: Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM) - *Retired*

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-14

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

11691 SW 17^th^ Street

Miami, FL. 33165-2149

Salutation: Mr. Steve Letro

Pronunciation: LEE-tro

Title: Meteorologist-in-Charge (MIC)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-15

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

13701 Fang Drive

Jacksonville, FL. 32218

Salutation: Mr. Dan Noah

Pronunciation: NO-a

Title: Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-14

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

2525 14^th^ Avenue, S.E.

Ruskin, FL. 33570

Salutation: Mr. John Feldt

Pronunciation: FELT

Title: Hydrologist-in-Charge (HIC)

Series & Grade: GS-1315 Grade GS-15

Complete Address: NWS Southeast River Forecast Office

4 Falcon Drive

Peachtree City, GA. 30269

Salutation: Mr. Walt Zaleski

Pronunciation: Za-LES-ki

Title: Regional Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-13

Complete Address: NWS -- Southern Region Headquarters

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Salutation: Mr. Gene Hafele

Pronunciation: HA-ful

Title: Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM)

Series & Grade: GS-1340 Grade GS-14

Complete Address: NWS Forecast Office

1353 FM 646 W, Suite 202

Dickinson, TX. 77539

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

Mr. Ken Haydu -- Special Act 2005, 2004, 2003

Mr. Ray Fagen -- Special Act 08/05, 07/04, 08/03

Mr. Bill Lawrence -- Special Act 08/05, 07/04, 08/03

Mr. Bill Read -- Special Act 08/05, 07/04, 08/03

Mr. Jesse Haro -- Special Act 08/05, 07/04, 08/03 -- Cash in Your
Account 07/05, 03/05, 01/05, 12/04, 07/04, 03/04, 09/03

Mr. John Schmidt -- Special Act 08/05, 08/04, 09/03

Mr. Jim Lushine -- Special Act 04/01, 01/02, 06/02, 07/02, 08/02, 04/03,
10/03, Cash in Your Account 04/03

Mr. Steve Letro -- Special Act 08/05, 07/04, 08/03

Mr. Dan Noah -- Special Act 07/05, 08/04, 11/03, 07/03, 04/03, Cash in
Your Account 10/04, Time Off Award 10/04, 03/04

Mr. John Feldt -- Special Act 08/05, 07/04, 08/03

Mr. Walt Zaleski -- Special Act 08/05, 07/05, 06/05, 08/04, 05/04,
06/03, 02/03

Mr. Gene Hafele -- Special Act 07/05, 08/04, 08/03

**6. Current Performance Rating:** TBD

Mr. Ken Haydu -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Ray Fagen -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Bill Lawrence -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Bill Read -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Jesse Haro -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. John Schmidt - Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Jim Lushine -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Steve Letro -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Dan Noah -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. John Feldt -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Walt Zaleski -- Meets or Exceeds

Mr. Gene Hafele - Meets or Exceeds

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Max Mayfield

National Hurricane Center

11691 SW 17th Street

Miami, Florida, 33165-2149 USA

305-229-4409

X. William Proenza

NWS Southern Region Headquarters

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

817-978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

NWS meteorologists and hydrologists, as members of the HLT, provided
critical hydrometeorological data and interpretation used by government
decision makers during the historic 2005 hurricane season.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For outstanding public service as NOAA/FEMA HLT members providing life
saving information to government officials during the 2005 hurricane
season.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

NHC -- National Hurricane Center

NWS -- National Weather Service

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

HLT -- Hurricane Liaison Team

FEMA -- Federal Emergency Management Agency

DHS -- Department of Homeland Security

VTC -- Video teleconference

MIC -- Meteorologist in charge

WCM -- Warning Coordination Meteorologist

DOT -- Department of Transportation

FHWA -- Federal Highway Administration

FDEM -- Florida Division of Emergency Management

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Department Strategic Goal/Objective 3.1: Advance understanding and
predict changes in the Earth's environment to meet America's economic,
social, and environmental needs.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

The Nation faced an unprecedented number of hurricanes in 2005,
including the landfall of 'major' hurricanes Dennis, Katrina, Rita and
Wilma. This activity required an unprecedented flow of information from
the NHC. This need was met in part by the NWS meteorologists and
hydrologists who deployed to the HLT at the NHC.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

9 meteorologists and 3 hydrologists supported the HLT at the NHC during
the 2005 Hurricane season. They came to the NHC not wearing their
day-to-day hats (as MICs, WCMs, etc.) but instead as part of a team in
support of national hurricane response operations. The HLT was activated
more than 50 days in 2005. HLT led more than 150 conference calls and
answered countless additional requests for information. This
coordination also included VTCs between the White House, DHS, FEMA, and
the affected States.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

HLT members assisted emergency managers requesting information and
provided the technical assistance to conference calls and VTCs that
assisted decision makers throughout the hurricane affected states. This
includes support for evacuation decision-making, logistics deployment
and threat assessments. The NWS support to the HLT was critical by
ensuring emergency managers had the critical information to make the
best decisions.

President Bush from his participation on the national VTC:

> *"I appreciate so very much the warnings that Max and his team have
> given to the good folks in Louisiana and Mississippi and Alabama."*

Craig Fugate, Director, FDEM:

> *"The National Weather Service's meteorologists and hydrologists that
> served on the Hurricane Liaison Team during the past year have
> provided Florida's State Emergency Response Team with a rapid exchange
> of information that was essential to our response and recovery
> operations."*

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}** (Maximum number of
characters for all six questions in this section cannot exceed 2000.)

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The Hurricane Liaison Team was activated for over 50 days this past
season (\~25 is normal), for six U.S. tropical cyclone impacts during
the period of July through October.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The NWS service and support as part of the HLT enhance the effectiveness
of the mission of to save lives and property. Additionally, the HLT
member's work helps solidify Federal, State and Local partnerships by
opening a channel to get the most up-to-date and highest quality of
information. This helps build the confidence and utilization of the NHC
and NWS organizations.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Providing key decision makers the information and tools to take informed
actions will have a cumulative positive economic effect. This will
mitigate the future cost of storms by minimizing the economic impacts of
natural disasters and decreasing the loss of life.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The HLT provided other federal agencies timely and critical
hydrometeorological interpretation for preparedness and response;
DHS/FEMA in the evaluation of risk and DOT/FHWA in support of evacuation
coordination.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The HLT communicates with federal agencies and hurricane vulnerable
states simultaneously using VTC. The technology for a VTC is not new,
but the application is key. The HLT is able to give one briefing to
everyone from the White House on down to affected States, balancing the
need to inform with economies in time spent collaborating, thus giving
interested parties more time to act. These VTCs provide effective and
consistent communication of hydrometeorological analysis and risk.
Everyone involved is able to ask questions, hear responses, thus
expanding the effectiveness and reach of the briefing.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

HLT members worked hundreds of extra hours, subordinating their normal
duties for their local offices to enhance operational services and meet
the national need. The information provided to evacuation decision
making officials by the NWS through the HLT provided a clear and
confident voice regarding the forecast and potential. 

**Mike Asmus Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #55**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**4. Name of Nominee: Mike Asmus**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: AS-mus**

**Title**: **Cooperative/Surface Program Manager**

**Series and Grade: GS-1341-12**

**Name of Nominee: David Billingsley**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: BILL-ings-lee**

**Title**: **Chief, Scientific Services**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-15**

**Name of Nominee: Kandis Boyd**

**Salutation: Ms**

**Pronunciation: CAN-diss Boyd**

**Title**: **Hydrology Program Manager**

**Series and Grade: GS-1315-13**

**Name of Nominee: Martin Garcia**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: gar-SEE-ah**

**Title**: **Electronics Program Manager**

**Series and Grade: GS-2210-13**

**Name of Nominee: Kenneth Graham**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: GRAY-hum**

**Title**: **Chief, Systems Operations**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-15**

**Name of Nominee: Charlie Lake**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Regional Systems Specialist**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-12**

**Name of Nominee: Gary Petroski**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: pah-TROS-kee**

**Title**: **IT/Security Program Manager**

**Series and Grade: GS-2210-13**

**Name of Nominee: Joe Villescaz**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: vee-YES-kez**

**Title**: **Regional Systems Specialist**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service Southern Region Headquarters**

**819 Taylor St. Rm 10A03**

**Fort Worth, TX 76102**

**Name of Nominee: Don Allen**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Facilities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-11**

**Name of Nominee: Jim McDaniel**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: mac-DAN-yell**

**Title**: **Regional Maintenance Specialist**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-12**

**Name of Nominee: Alvin Ruffin**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: RUFF-in**

**Title**: **Supervisory Facilities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**3401 Northern Cross Blvd.**

**Fort Worth, TX 76137-3610**

**Name of Nominee: Keith De Armas**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: de-ARM-us**

**Title**: **Facilities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-11**

**Name of Nominee: Larry Tennison**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: TEN-eh-son**

**Title**: **Regional Maintenance Specialist**

**Series and Grade: GGS-0856-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**62300 Airport Rd.**

**Slidell, LA 70460-5243**

**Name of Nominee: Steve Duaime**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: doo-am-e**

**Title**: **Electronic Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-11**

**Name of Nominee: Danny Dowden**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: DOW-den**

**Title**: **Electronic Systems Analyst**

**Series and Grade: GS-2210-13**

**Name of Nominee: Kent Kuyper**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: KIE-per**

**Title**: **Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Name of Nominee: Ricky Guidry**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: GID-rey**

**Title**: **Electronic Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**500 Airport Blvd. #115**

**Lake Charles, LA 706-0699**

**Name of Nominee: Dan Collis**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: KAL-is**

**Title**: **Falicities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**4 Falcon Dr.**

**Peachtree City, GA 30269**

**Name of Nominee: Brian Read**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Electronic Systems Analyst**

**Series and Grade: GS-2210-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**2090 Airport Rd.**

**New Braunfels, TX 78130**

**Name of Nominee: Curtis McAfee**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: mac-AH-fee**

**Title**: **Electronic Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-11**

**Name of Nominee: Daniel Byrd**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: Bird**

**Title**: **Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-12**

**Name of Nominee: Mike Ryan**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: RYE-an**

**Title**: **Electronic Systems Analyst**

**Series and Grade: GS-2210-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**234 Weather Service Dr.**

**Jackson, MS 39232**

**Name of Nominee: Larry Van Bussum**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: van-BUSS-uhm**

**Title**: **Fire Weather Operations Coordinator**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**3833 S. Development Ave.**

**Boise, ID 83705-5354**

**Name of Nominee: Roger Ducharme**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: doo-CHARM-eh**

**Title**: **Electronic Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service Eastern Region Headquarters**

**630 Johnson Ave. Suite 202**

**Bohemia, NY 11716-2618**

**Name of Nominee: Lee Smith**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Facilities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**732 Woodlane Rd.**

**Mt. Holly, NJ 08060**

**Name of Nominee: Leslie Day**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: LEZ-ly Day**

**Title**: **Facilities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**32 Dawes Dr.**

**Johnson City, NY 13790**

**Name of Nominee: Tim Weiler**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: WHILE-er**

**Title**: **Facilities Engineering Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0802-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**44087 Weather Service Rd.**

**Sterling, VA 20166-2001**

**Name of Nominee: Greg Meffert**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: MEFF-ert**

**Title**: **Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-12**

**Name of Nominee: William Whitlock**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: WIT-lock**

**Title**: **Electronic Systems Analyst**

**Series and Grade: GS-2210-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**8250 Kentucky Highway**

**West Paducah, KY 42086-9762**

**Name of Nominee: Alan Johnson**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Electronics Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**5250 E. Lee Bird Drive**

**North Platte, NE 69101-2473**

**Name of Nominee: Robert Baye**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: Bay**

**Title**: **Electronics Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**300 E. Signal Dr.**

**Rapid City, SD 57701-3800**

**Name of Nominee: Michael Gill**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Electronics Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-11**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**2142 S. Tyler Road**

**Wichita, KS 67209-3016**

**Name of Nominee: Terrell Ballard**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: BAL-ard**

**Title**: **Lead Electronics Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-13**

**Name of Nominee: Franklin Hewins**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: HEW-ins**

**Title**: **Electronics Technician**

**Series and Grade: GS-0856-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Radar Operations Center**

**1200 Westheimer Dr.**

**Norman, OK 73069-7902**

**Name of Nominee: Richard Davis**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Senior Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**2525 14^th^ Ave. S.E.**

**Ruskin, FL 33570**

**Name of Nominee: Thomas Bird**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Senior Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Complete office address;**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**7950 Airport Rd.**

**Santa Teresa, NM 88008**

**Name of Nominee: Jon Pelton**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: PELL-ton**

**Title**: **Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**1329 Airport Road**

**Jackson, KY 41339**

**Name of Nominee: Greg Murdoch**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: mur-dock**

**Title**: **Senior Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Name of Nominee: Eric Platt**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: As written**

**Title**: **Senior Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**2500 Challenger Dr.**

**Midland, TX 79706-2606**

**Name of Nominee: Joe Goudsward**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: GOODS-ward**

**Title**: **Senior Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-13**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**8400 Remount Rd.**

**North Little Rock, AR 72118**

**Name of Nominee: Brent Wachter**

**Salutation: Mr**

**Pronunciation: WATCH-er**

**Title**: **Forecaster**

**Series and Grade: GS-1340-12**

**Complete office address:**

**National Weather Service**

**Weather Forecast Office**

**2341 Clark Carr Loop SE**

**Albuquerque, NM 87106-5633**

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

**Thomas Bird DOC Bronze 2004**

**Richard Davis DOC Bronze 2004**

**Greg Murdoch DOC Bronze 2004**

**6. Current Performance Rating: All Pass**

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

X. William Proenza, Director

NWS Southern Region

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

817-978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment? (200
characters)]{.underline}**

This group deployed to the Katrina devastated region performing
emergency repairs to critical equipment and facilities and providing
emergency weather support to recovery teams in the area.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline} (150 characters).**

For providing selfless service and support to recovery efforts in the
region devastated by Hurricane Katrina.

**[II. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}** (cannot exceed 2000.)

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Restoration of critical facilities and equipment and weather support for
recovery teams in the field support Strategic Goal 3, Objective 3.1,
"...to predict changes in the environment...to meet economic, social,
and environmental needs."

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

The group deployed to the region devastated by Katrina. There was
widespread and devastating destruction. The closest open gas station or
grocery store was almost 100 miles away. The only communications with
the rest of the world was very limited through ham radio operators and
some satellite circuits. The group had to endure these adverse working
conditions, power outages, communications outages, lack of lodging
accommodations, and scarcity of food and water while performing repair
work and providing support for recovery teams.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Members of the group provided various services according to their
individual skills. Facilities technicians repaired damaged buildings,
electrical systems, water systems, etc. Electronics personnel repaired
damaged electronic equipment, communications equipment and observational
equipment. Meteorologists used special mobile workstations to provide
critical weather forecast support to recovery teams operating in the
area. Others transported fuel, food, and water from distant locations to
support the workers remaining in the area.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms[.]{.underline}**

Actions and support provided by the group enabled on site NOAA employees
to continue providing services and restoration of critical facilities
and equipment was expedited despite adverse conditions. Weather forecast
and advisory support provided to recovery teams facilitated rescue
activities ongoing in the area.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}** (cannot exceed
2000.)

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

First members of the group deployed on August 31, 2005 and support
continued through October 28, 2005.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The actions of this group have set the standard for on-site recovery
support for NOAA facilities and employees after a natural disaster. In
the near term, lessons learned will enable better positioning of
emergency supplies and equipment to facilitate even faster recovery
activities following major disasters.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Lessons learned during the repair and recovery effort will lead to
further hardening of facilities in coastal areas, additional emergency
power supplies for critical equipment and infrastructure support, e.g.
water systems, and improved communication redundancy.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Support was provide to many recovery teams in the area including the
U.S. Army, the National Guard, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard, Red
Cross, Salvation Army, FEMA, and many independent first responders who
came into the area from across the country.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

New data handling procedures developed "on-the-fly" during the recovery
support will enable communication of vital environmental information via
satellite and Internet systems during future major communications
outages.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Deployment of on-site tactical meteorological support provided critical
information to recovery teams and first responders dealing with a major
disaster. This new procedure for providing weather and hydrologic
support on-site during high impact events will become the preferred
method of operation for the NWS.

**Randy Rieman Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #56**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**1. Type of Award:** **Hurricane Katrina Bronze**

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**4. Name of Nominee:** Randy Rieman

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** REE-man

**Title**: Hydrologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1315-14

**Name of Nominee:** John F. Kuhn

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** KOON

**Title**: Hydrologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1315-13

**Name of Nominee:** Jeffrey Zimmerman

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Zim-mer-man

**Title**: Supervisory Hydrologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1315-14

**Name of Nominee:** Paul Tilles

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Til-us

**Title**: Information Technology Specialist

**Series and Grade:** GS-2210-13

**Name of Nominee:** Lawrence Cedrone

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation**: Se-DRONE

**Title**: Information Technology Specialist

**Series and Grade:** GS-2210-14

**Complete office address:** NOAA, National Weather Service

W/OS32

1325 East West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910

> NOAA, National Weather Service

W/OHD

1325 East West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

Rieman -- NOAA Administrator's Award in 2004

Kuhn -- None

Zimmerman -- None

Tilles -- None

Cedrone -- NOAA Bronze Medal Award in 1988

NOAA/NWS Isaac Cline Award in 2001

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass for all**.**

**7. Nominators Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Gary Carter, Director, NWS Office of Hydrologic Development

1325 East-West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910

Telephone: (301)713-1658 x143

Internet Address: <gary.carter@noaa.gov>

Dennis McCarthy, Director, NWS Office of Climate, Water, and Weather
Services

1325 East-West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910

Telephone: (301)713-0700

Internet Address: <dennis.mccarthy@noaa.gov>

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The activities engaged in by the nominees enabled the continuation of
river forecasting responsibilities for the protection of life and
property during the landfall of Hurricane Katrina. Without these
actions, the ability to provide timely river forecast information for
the lower Mississippi River basin would have been compromised.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For Professional Excellence in support of the continuity of operations
and the delivery of hydrologic services in the wake of Hurricane
Katrina.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

AWIPS - Advanced Weather Interactive Processing System

LMRFC - Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center

NHO-R - National Headquarters Operational System - RFC

RFC - River Forecast Center

WFO - Weather Forecast Office

RAWS -- Remote Automated Weather Station

HADS -- Hydrometeorological Automated Data System

BLM -- Bureau of Land Management

OHD -- Office of Hydrologic Development

DHS -- Department of Homeland Security

**[Section 2 - Award Justification]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

> The LMRFC was unable to issue critical river forecasts and other
> products and information due to communications failures associated
> with the landfall of Hurricane Katrina. These forecasts and data are
> provided to affiliated WFOs, who in turn, collaboratively generate a
> suite of forecast and warning information and products which are
> provided to partners and customers via a number of dissemination
> pathways. These products and information are used by a spectrum of
> partners including federal, state, and local public officials, the
> media, who work collaboratively with the NWS to alert the general
> public of flood risks. The actions of the nominees enabled the
> critical, potentially life-saving forecast and warning information to
> reach public officials and those in path of Hurricane Katrina.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

> The nominees addressed the problem by configuring the AWIPS NHO-R in
> Silver Spring so that LMRFC personnel could use the NHO-R to
> assimilate data, execute forecast applications, and disseminate river
> forecasts. Essentially, the operational forecast staff at the LMRFC
> were able to perform their forecast operations remotely on this AWIPS
> workstation in Silver Spring, thereby enabling NOAA's NWS to meet it
> mission of issuing timely and accurate forecast and warning
> information for the protection of life and property. Without the
> focused and timely efforts of the nominees, this would not have been
> possible. The nominees also added five RAWS deployed by the BLM to
> OHD's HADS to support acquisition of real-time data soon after
> hurricane landfall.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> The nominees worked to ensure that the NHO-R was able to ingest and
> process data relevant to LMRFC operations, ensured that data
> assimilation and forecasting applications on the NHO-R were configured
> for LMRFC operations, ensured that LMRFC-specific configuration files
> necessary for their forecast applications were available on the NHO-R,
> configured the NHO-R to enable the dissemination of LMRFC river
> forecasts, and ensured the LMRFC personnel were able to access and use
> the NHO-R effectively. The nominees also provided access to new
> hydrometeorological sensor data deployed in the wake of the hurricane.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms[?]{.underline}**

> As a result of the actions taken, the LMRFC was able to effectively
> and efficiently disseminate and distribute river forecasts and other
> products and information to affiliated WFOs and regional partners and
> customers.
>
> **[Section 3 - Additional Information]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

> Configuration of the NHO-R took 8-10 hours to complete. The LMRFC was
> able to use the
>
> NHO-R upon completion of the configuration. The addition of the five
> new RAWS to the HADS data flow occurred within 10 days following the
> hurricane.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Departments mission**?

> The nominees demonstrated the capability to establish an operational
> backup configuration in real time to ensure the timely dissemination
> of hydrologic information by the LMRFC and its associated WFOs to
> local public officials and the general public alike. This information
> was critical for the well being of Americans impacted by Hurricane
> Katrina.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Departments mission?**

> The nominees' accomplishments have established a framework for further
> enhancements to the RFC operational backup capability. We can now
> apply what has been learned from this real world test of our
> operational backup capability to the design of future systems which
> should significantly benefit all RFCs nationwide.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

> The nominees accomplishments enabled critical hydrologic forecast and
> warning information to be disseminated to a spectrum of federal,
> state, and local public officials who work collaboratively with the
> NWS to alert the general public of flood risks and take action to
> mitigate flood impacts. These agencies/public officials include the
> DHS and state and local emergency managers.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

> Lessons learned from the implementation of backup operations for LMRFC
> are being applied towards a National RFC backup plan.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

> The activity demonstrated, in real time, the ability to use remote
> computing resources to provide functional and computation backup
> capabilities for RFC operations.

**Michael Hudson Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #57**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**3. Nomination Category:** Scientific/Engineering Achievement

**4. Name of Nominee:** Michael J. Hudson

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** HUD-son

**Title**: Warning Coordination Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service Office

WFO Pleasant Hill

1803 North 7 Highway

Pleasant Hill, MO 64080-9421

**Name of Nominee:** Evan M. Bookbinder

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** BOOK-bind-er

**Title**: Meteorologist/Lead Forecaster

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service Office

WFO Pleasant Hill

1803 North 7 Highway

Pleasant Hill, MO 64080-9421

**Name of Nominee:** Brian P. Walawender

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** WALL-a-wend-er

**Title**: Information Technology Officer

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service Office

WFO Topeka

1116 NE Strait Ave.

Topeka, KS 66616-1698

**Name of Nominee:** Joseph Palko

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** PAL-ko

**Title**: Meteorologist/Lead Forecaster

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA/National Weather Service Office

WFO Pittsburgh

192 Shafer Road

Moon Township, PA 15108-1093

**Name of Nominee:** Nancy E. Helderman

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** HELD-der-man

**Title**: Meteorologist/Lead Forecaster

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:** NOAA**/**National Weather Service

Office of Operational Systems, W/OPS23\
1325 East West Hwy. Room 4460\
Silver Spring, MD 20910

**5. Other DoC/National Weather Service Awards:**

Hudson: None

Bookbinder: None

Walawender: None

Palko: 2004 DOC Bronze Medal -- Group/AVNFPS

1999 National Cline -- Group/Tornado Outbreak

1998 DOC Unit Citation -- 6/98 Floods

1998 DOC Unit Citation -- 6/98 Tornadoes

1991 DOC Bronze Medal -- Group/Probabilistic QPF

Helderman: None

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass for all 5**.**

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Peter Browning, Chief, Meteorological Science Division

NOAA/NWS Central Region Headquarters

7220 NW 101^st^ Terrace, Kansas City, MO 64153-2371

Telephone: (816) 891-7734 x300

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

A field office team software development that replaces WWA and CAFÉ
software in AWIPS, providing sustainable and improved NWR broadcast
programming which keeps the public informed with efficient updates and
summaries of warning and forecast information. The team was comprised
mostly of field office people whose normal job duties do not include the
development of nationally deployed software.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For outstanding work in the development of NWRWAVES software -- an
efficient, sustainable and improved program for the production of NWR
programming.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

AWIPS -- Advanced Weather Information Processing System

CAFÉ -- Collection of software scripts used by AWIPS to generate CRS
programming

CRS -- Console Replacement System

DHS -- Department of Homeland Security

GHG -- Graphical Hazards Generator

HazCollect -- Process where DHS can send hazard information statements
directly to NWR

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWR -- NOAA Weather Radio, also referred to as NOAA All-hazards Radio

NWRWAVES -- NWR with Advanced VTEC Enabled Software

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

OB6 -- AWIPS Operational Build 6

OB8 -- AWIPS Operational Build 8

VTEC -- Valid Time Event Code

WBC -- Watch By County

WFO -- NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

WWA -- Watch Warning Advisory software program

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

As the importance of NOAA's All-hazards radio increases, the software
for providing an efficient, high quality broadcast had become obsolete
and difficult to maintain. NWRWAVES replaces software originally
designed as a temporary solution (CAFÉ), and makes use of new
capabilities (VTEC and WBC) to improve the efficiency of the automation
of NWR broadcasts. The software addresses protection of life and
property by rapidly broadcasting information concerning hazards to the
public and maintaining a relevant broadcast cycle through the removal of
obsolete and summarization of valid information without human
intervention.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

With the implementation of VTEC and WBC (fall 2005), the WWA program was
replaced with GHG capabilities. This team was formed to update the CAFÉ
software to utilize VTEC and WBC and to address additional requirements
provided by WWA. Since the CAFÉ software structure is difficult to
maintain, the team developed new software to replace CAFÉ.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

The team researched requirements, designed, developed, tested and
deployed NWRWAVES software nationwide. Software support was provided
with training videos and e-mail list postings.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

All NOAA/NWS Forecast Offices are using NWRWAVES for the generation of
NWR programming. NWRWAVES is baseline software in AWIPS.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The team, formed in January 2005, required 14 months to complete its
goal. The final version of the software was deployed in April 2006.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

It provides improvements in the efficiency of NWR programming at all
WFOs. With previous software, a person was needed to maintain the
broadcast cycles of many different transmitters during severe weather
events. The new software utilizes VTEC to remove, replace and summarize
pertinent warning information automatically. The software is also easier
to troubleshoot and maintain than the obsolete CAFÉ and WWA programs.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Provides a basis for future improvements and is sustainable through the
remaining lifetime of CRS.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

No.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The NWRWAVES software provides improved automation capabilities by
utilizing WBC and VTEC in the removal and replacement of outdated
information and for the summarization of important warning information
during large severe weather events.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

The NWS wide use of NWRWAVES software improves customer service by
providing a timely broadcast of critical hazards and routine information
which is up to date and current. CAFÉ required human intervention for
maintaining consistently useful broadcasts. This was time consuming for
all WFOs, especially offices which have a large number of transmitters
that required constant monitoring. NWRWAVES minimizes this intervention
by using VTEC to track the lifecycle of warning and statement
information.

**Gregory Murdoch Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #58**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** Gregory Murdoch

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Mur-Dock

**Title**: Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Name of Nominee:** Doug Cain

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Kane

**Title**: Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Name of Nominee:** Rebecca Gould

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** Goold

**Title**: Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-9

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

WFO Midland TX

> 2005 Challenger Drive
>
> Midland TX 79706

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** Murdoch - Bronze Medal
October 2003

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass for all**.**

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

X. William Proenza, Director

NWS Southern Region

817 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Telephone: (817) 978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The group provided over 600 hours of on-site incident meteorological
services to the Texas Forest Service during a record-breaking wildfire
season in Texas from December 2005 to March 2006.

**[Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For providing life-saving incident meteorological services to the Texas
Forest Service during a record-breaking wildfire season.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

NOAA's NWS Incident Meteorologists (IMETs) work throughout the year in
many of NOAA\'s weather forecast offices, but during the fire season,
they pack their bags and head to a wildfire that could be burning
anywhere from coast to coast. At the fires, the IMETs provide weather
briefings, forecasts, and work closely with the fire managers so they
can plan and prepare their fire fighting tactics.

[Acronyms]{.underline}

DOC Department of Commerce

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

IMET NOAA/NWS Incident Meteorologist

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS NOAA's National Weather Service

TFS Texas Forest Service

WFO NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

NOAA's Incident Meteorologist (IMET) program works to save lives. This
achievement contributed to the Department's Strategic Goal 3, Objective
3.1; to Advance understanding and predict changes in the Earth's
environment to meet America's economic, social, and environmental needs.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

The nominees worked long hours at the Incident Command Center and served
under considerable stress as fires were ongoing in multiple areas of the
State and support was required on short notice for multiple locations.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

From December 2005 through April 2006, record breaking wildfires across
Texas scarred more than 1.3 million acres and burned more than 400
homes. Eighty-five percent of these large Texas wildfires occurred
within two miles of a community. These historic wildfires have resulted
in records set in acres burned, number of homes affected, and number of
FEMA disaster declarations.

The Texas Forecast Service (TFS) called upon NOAA's National Weather
Service (NWS) to provide incident meteorologist support on-site at their
Incident Command Center in College Station, TX and Grandbury, TX from 6
AM to 6 PM seven days per week, plus quick response on-call support
during the nighttime hours.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

In their normal jobs, these employees work standard shifts at their home
office providing weather services to the general public and other users
in far west Texas. During this special assignment, these three
individuals (Mr. Murdoch, Mr. Cain and Ms. Gould) contributed more than
600 hours of short fused on-site incident meteorological support to the
Texas Forest Service to immensely aid in their firefighting initial
attack and firefighting resource planning operations for the entire
state of Texas. These IMET briefings and forecasts during critical fire
weather days helped to significantly minimize and contain the rapid
spread of on-going wildfires with resultant lives saved and fewer
residences and communities evacuated.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

On-site high impact incident meteorological support was provided to the
TFS and other agencies from December 2005 through April 2006.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Providing on-site high impact incident meteorological support during
hazardous weather situations directly contributes to the Department's
Strategic Goal 3, Objective 3.1; to Advance understanding and predict
changes in the Earth's environment to meet America's economic, social,
and environmental needs.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

As more and more people become aware of the threat from rapidly
spreading wildfires,

additional measures can be taken to save lives. This could include
additional critical fire

weather forecasts and warnings, media awareness and daily briefings to
on-site fire fighters.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Partners include the U.S. Forest Service and the TFS. Many other
federal, state, and local agencies were involved in the effort to
respond and contain large and rapidly spreading wildfires. Speaking on
behalf of the Texas Forest Service, Dale Little stated, "On a daily
basis - -7 days a week, we have worked hand in hand with them. Every
morning during the morning briefings, they have been here to advise of
the upcoming weather for the day, and what is expected in the future. 
Without the expertise and the knowledge that they have provided, the
operation would not have been as great a success as it has been. The
information that has been delivered each day, has in my opinion, been
one of the determining factors on the safety of each fire fighter, and
with this information we have not had fire fighters injured."

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. Much scientific data gather on how wildfires spread under different
weather regimes will help fire suppression in future fire events.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

This on-site high impact incident meteorological support, provided to
multiple agencies in the midst of a historic wildfire season, serves as
a model for responsive customer service.

**Richard Okulski Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #59**

**1. Type of Award**: Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**3. Nomination Category:** Public Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** Richard Okulski

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Rich-ard OH-KULL-ski

**Title**: Warning Coordination Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS 1340-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA National Weather Service Forecast
Office

> 7777 Walnut Grove Rd., OM1
>
> Memphis, TN 38120-2198

**Name of Nominee:** Robert L. Rood

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Ra-BERT RUDE

**Title**: Telecommunications Specialist

**Series and Grade:** GS-0391-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA National Weather Service

> Office of Science and Technology
>
> 1325 East-West Highway
>
> SSMC2, Room 12132
>
> Silver Spring, MD 20910

**Name of Nominee:** Russell Schneider

**Salutation:** Dr.

**Pronunciation:** Russell SHNI-der

**Title**: Science Support Branch Chief

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-15

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA Storm Prediction Center

> 1313 Halley Circle
>
> Norman, OK 73069

**Name of Nominee:** Jason Franklin

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** JAY-son FRANK-lin

**Title**: Mesoscale and Regional Aviation Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete Office** **Address:** NOAA National Weather Service Eastern
Region

> Airport Corporate Center
>
> 630 Johnson Avenue
>
> Bohemia, NY 11716-2626

**Name of Nominee:** Harold James (Jim) Keeney Jr.

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Jim KEE-nee

**Title**: Regional Weather Services Program Manager

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA National Weather Service Central
Region

> 7220 NW 101^st^ Terrace
>
> Kansas City, MO 64153

**Name of Nominee:** Walter (Walt) J. Zaleski Jr.

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Walt ZA-le-SKEE

**Title**: Regional Warning Coordination Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete Office Address**: NOAA National Weather Service Southern
Region

> 819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03
>
> Fort Worth, TX 76102-6171

**Name of Nominee:** Steve Schotz

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Steve SHOTS

**Title**: N-AWIPS Team Lead

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA National Centers for Environmental
Prediction

> 5200 Auth Road, Room 302
>
> Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304

**Name of Nominee:** Gregory Grosshans

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Gregory GROSS-hans

**Title**: Technique Development Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete Office Address**: NOAA Storm Prediction Center

> 1313 Halley Circle
>
> Norman, OK 73069

**Name of Nominee:** Daniel McCarthy

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Daniel MACK-CARTHEE

**Title**: SPC Warning Coordination Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete Office Address**: NOAA Storm Prediction Center

> 1313 Halley Circle
>
> Norman, OK 73069

**Series and Grade: Name of Nominee:** Paul R. Flatt

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Paul Flat

**Title**: Warning Coordination Meteorologist

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete Office Address:** NOAA National Weather Service Forecast
Office Boise

> 3833 S. Development Avenue
>
> Boise, ID 83705-5354

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

> Schneider - Organizational Gold Medal 2004
>
> Schneider - Organizational Silver Medal 2001
>
> Schneider - Organizational Bronze Medal 1997
>
> Schneider - Organizational Gold Medal 1993
>
> Schneider - Organizational Gold Medal 1993
>
> McCarthy - Organizational Gold Medal 2004
>
> McCarthy - Organizational Silver Medal 2001
>
> McCarthy - Organizational Bronze Medal 1997
>
> Schotz - Group Bronze Medal 2000
>
> Schotz - Administrators Award 2000
>
> Grosshans - Organizational Gold Medal 2004
>
> Grosshans - Organizational Silver Medal 2001
>
> Grosshans - Organizational Bronze Medal 1997
>
> Flatt - Administrators Award 2004
>
> Flatt -- Organizational Bronze Medal 1999
>
> Okulski -- Organizational Bronze Medal 1999

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass for each.

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Louis Uccellini, Director

NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction

5200 Auth Road

Camp Springs, MD 20746-4304

301-763-8000, x7000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

This team led the effort that made NOAA's tornado and severe
thunderstorm watch a NWS-wide collaborative product. As a result,
convective watches are emblematic of the "One NOAA" vision.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For outstanding public service in providing the public with a vastly
improved suite of watch products to raise awareness during severe
weather events.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

**DOD** -- The Department of Defense.

**FAA** -- The Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation
Administration.

**FEMA** -- The Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency
Management Agency.

**GPRA** -- The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993,
which mandates that the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
shall require each agency to prepare an annual performance plan which
establishes performance goals for each program activity set forth in the
budget.

**Severe Thunderstorm Watch** - A NOAA product which alerts the public,
media and emergency managers to the development of conditions, over a
limited geographic area, that are conducive to organized thunderstorms
capable of producing six or more reports of ¾ (penny) diameter hail or
greater or damaging wind of 50 knots (58 miles per hour) or greater.
Watches are issued on an as needed basis. A watch indicates that
conditions are favorable for the development of tornadoes and/or severe
thunderstorms. This is different from a warning, which is issued when
severe weather event is imminent.

**NOAA --** The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

**NWS --** NOAA's National Weather Service

**SPC** - The NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center

**Tornado Watch** -- A NOAA forecast product which alerts the public,
media and emergency managers to the development of conditions, over a
limited geographic area, that are conducive to organized thunderstorms
capable of producing three or more tornadoes or any tornado which could
produce F2 (a significant on the Fujita Tornado Intensity Scale with
winds of 113 to 157 miles per hour) or greater damage. Watches are
issued on an as-needed basis. A watch indicates that conditions are
favorable for the development of tornadoes and/or severe thunderstorms.
This is different from a warning, which is issued when severe weather
event is imminent.

**WFO** -- One of 122 local NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Offices in the
contiguous United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Hawaii and Guam.

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

The mission of NOAA's NWS is to protect the life and property of the
American people through the issuance of timely, accurate forecasts of
tornadoes and other hazardous weather to meet the Nation's needs for
Weather and Water. While the scientific basis for forecasting severe
storms has improved dramatically over the past 30 years, the convective
watch had changed little. The newly implemented Watch-By-County is a
collaborative process that unifies the NWS forecast message, and
increases WFO situational awareness contributing to increased warning
lead time (NWS GPRA goal).

-   **What was the context in which the nominees addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

This was accomplished by a cross organization team whose members
possessed diverse specialties that was drawn together to implement a
complex NOAA severe weather program goal. Team members came from
headquarters, national centers and local offices and dealt with issues
ranging from product formatting to customer outreach.

-   **What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

The team developed a NWS-wide Watch-by-County Operations Concept;
finalized product formats; designed, coordinated and executed
operational tests; led development of needed software and training,
thoroughly surveyed and addressed NOAA customer needs, and successfully
implemented the new service nationwide. The effort was very large in
breadth of impact. Success required that the technical and operational
interactions to be refined to a high level of precision.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Watch-by-County became fully operational on 1 November 2005. Within the
first month of operations, four major severe weather outbreaks occurred.
The integrated system which the team led to operational status worked
very well. The modernized NOAA Convective Watch meets the needs of
emergency managers, broadcasters, private weather partners and other
officials concerned with public safety. The new collaborative product
suite allows NOAA customers to track all Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado
Watches to the county level. The addition of marine zones to watches
gives maritime customers the same level of service as land customers.
Since it raises the level of severe weather awareness, this effort has
lead to an enhanced protection of life and property on land and sea.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Focused pursuit of Watch-by-County began in 2002. The team, which had
inherited a program with serious deficiencies, worked through the
obstacles to a successful November 2005 implementation.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

NOAA convective watch products now result from a collaboration that
incorporates the SPC's scientific specialization, and the WFO's local
knowledge. Watch products are now specific and easily decoded. The
public hears a unified NOAA voice giving precise and consistent severe
weather information.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Watch-by-County lays a foundation for advances in severe weather
forecast specificity as NOAA moves to Geographic Information System
(GIS) compatible products. When coupled with a move toward prognostic
warnings, it will result in a seamless suite of severe weather forecasts
from long range outlooks through short term warnings.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes. Increased watch specificity aids NOAA's government partners. The
DOD uses watches to alert assets of impending hazardous weather. The FAA
uses watches to route aircraft around threat areas. FEMA and local
emergency managers use watches to marshal resources needed to respond to
severe weather.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. The software and precisely meshed forecasts associated with the new
watch dramatically improved NWS product consistency. A key lesson
learned from the effort was that critical programs require a thorough
operations concept and a focused team representing all impacted NOAA
elements.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Yes. It resulted in a major advancement in public service. The new watch
process provides coordinated "One NOAA" information in a more precise
and user friendly format. External partners anxiously awaited expressed
enthusiasm with the new products. A note from the Weather Channel
stated, "I appreciate your indicating graphically when areas have been
cleared from a watch \... the more specific you make that information,
the more likely it is to be taken seriously. Thanks again for your great
work."

**Larry Rundquist Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #60**

**Alaska's Volunteer Pilot River Watch Program**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** Larry Rundquist

**Salutation:** Dr.

**Pronunciation:** RUND KWIST

**Title**: Development and Operations Hydrologist, Alaska -- Pacific
River Forecast Center

(APRFC)

**Series and Grade:** GS-1315-14

**Name of Nominee:** Jeff Perry

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** PAIREE

**Title**: Senior Hydrometeorological Analysis and Support Forecaster,
APRFC

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

> **Name of Nominee:** Rebecca Perry

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** PAIREE

**Title**: Hydrologic Technician, APRFC

**Series and Grade:** GS-1316-8

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> Alaska -- Pacific River Forecast Center

6930 Sand Lake Road

Anchorage, AK 99502-1845

**Name of Nominee:** Edward Plumb

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** PLUM

**Title**: Service Hydrologist, Weather Forecast Office (WFO) Fairbanks

**Series and Grade:** GS-1315-12

**Name of Nominee:** Brad Sipperley

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** SIPPER LEE

**Title**: Hydrometeorological Technician, WFO Fairbanks

**Series and Grade:** GS-1341-11

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> WFO Fairbanks, UAF-IARC Building
>
> Post Office Box 757345
>
> Fairbanks, AK 99775-7345

**5. Other DoC/National Weather Service Awards:**

Rundquist: 2003 Bronze Medal (Group)

2004 NWS Max Kohler Award (received May 2005)

Plumb: 2005 Silver Medal (Office)

Sipperley: 2002, 2003, 2004 National Isaac Cline Award (Group)

2005 Silver Medal (Office)

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Pass for all**.**

**7. Nominator\'s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Laura K. Furgione, Director

NOAA/National Weather Service Alaska Region Headquarters

222 West 7^th^ Ave., #23

Anchorage, AK 99513-7575

Telephone: (907) 271-5136

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The team recruited pilots flying to isolated riverside villages to
provide pilot reports of river ice conditions critical to ice jam flood
forecasts, supplementing limited ground and satellite data.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For developing an innovative program using volunteer pilots to send
pilot reports of river ice conditions in data sparse areas.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

ADF&G Alaska Department of Fish and Game

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FSS Flight Service Station

Flood Any high flow, overflow, or inundation by water which causes or
threatens damage

Ice jam A blockage or partial blockage of river flow caused by the
formation of ice or collection of ice fragments; may act as a dam

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

PIPEP **[Pi]{.underline}**lot **[Rep]{.underline}**ort is a standardized
reporting format pilots use in flight to report meteorological
conditions that might affect other aircraft such as icing, turbulence or
wind speed; this program extends these reports to include standardized
remarks on river ice conditions.

USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department\'s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

The team directly supported Department of Commerce (DOC) Goal/Objective
3.1, *Advance understanding and predict changes in the Earth\'s
environment to meet America\'s economic, social and environmental
needs.* The ability to serve society's need for weather and water
information can be reduced in Alaska by a lack of observational data
caused by the inaccessibility of many areas and the inherent limitations
of polar orbiting satellites. Forecasts for ice jam flooding require
knowledge of the condition of river ice along long stretches of the
river basin.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?**

Historical practice in Alaska allowed NOAA/National Weather Service
(NWS) hydrologists to collaborate with state emergency management
personnel to perform aerial reconnaissance on key rivers, providing
excellent support for forecast and warning operations. Budgetary
constraints had begun to limit the time available for charter aircraft
operations, potentially resulting in a decrease in forecast timeliness
and accuracy.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

Working with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Flight Service
Stations (FSS), pilot associations, charter aircraft companies and small
regional airlines, the nominees identified a group of volunteer pilots
to provide pilot reports (PIREPs) of critical river ice conditions as
they flew over area rivers during routine operations. The nominees
developed training material, guides, and pilot tools, provided training
to pilots and FSS representatives, and implemented an automated system
to acquire the PIREPs and make them readily available to NWS
hydrologists and the public.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The team\'s efforts conserved resources and improved river breakup
forecasts. Their program collected valuable data from volunteer pilots,
enabling NWS hydrologists and Alaska emergency managers schedule costly
chartered reconnaissance flights over the Yukon and Kuskokwim Rivers for
the onset of breakup activity to maximize the cost benefits of these
flights. Additionally, the group\'s efforts provided ice condition data
on rivers not previously included in the NWS reconnaissance program,
improving breakup forecasts on those rivers.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

In the spring of 2004, the team developed initial training material for
Fairbanks-area Civil Air Patrol pilots. The pilot program over the
northern half of the state was organized in March 2005, and PIREPs were
delivered successfully from April to June. Over 50 PIREPs were submitted
by participants including six individuals, four aviation charter
services, three state or federal governmental agencies, and two FSS. It
would have cost over \$15,000 to get this information from 34 chartered
flights. This spring, the program was extended to the balance of the
State, and data collection will begin in late April.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

This achievement will provide data coverage in new areas while
eliminating costly initial reconnaissance flights. The effort conserves
resources while improving forecasts of river ice breakup and potential
ice jam flooding that threatens lives and property each spring.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

Flooding in remote villages during spring breakup is a serious threat to
lives and property. The team\'s efforts will result in improved
forecasts in an expanded area, reducing the threat to the affected
communities. Costly reconnaissance flights may begin later now, once the
volunteers\' reports indicate breakup is actually underway. The
program\'s training material and guides will facilitate implementation
in other NWS regions.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Collaborators on this project included the FAA as the point of contact
with the pilots, as well as pilots of the USFWS, ADF&G, and the Alaska
State Troopers. These partners receive improved river forecast
information which they utilize to protect lives and property. In
addition, Patricia Weyrick, manager of the US Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) Cold Regions Research and Experimental Laboratory (CRREL) Ice Jam
Database, emailed this about the PIREPS and her ability to access them
on the NWS web pages: "I love the PIREPs! WOW! This is fantastic!!
Thanks SO much!"

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

This program utilizes current scientific techniques to extend data
collection and implement an automated system to acquire and disseminate
pilot reports.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

This program represents a major advance in the ability to collect
critical, seasonal, low cost data in data sparse areas while
strengthening our collaborative relationships with our user community.

**Tony Hall Group**

**NWS**

**Nomination #61**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Group

**3. Nomination Category:** Scientific/Engineering Achievement

**4. Name of Nominee:** Tony Hall

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Hall

**Title**: Meteorologist**-**in-Charge

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Complete office address:**

> Alaska Aviation Weather Unit
>
> 6930 Sand Lake Road
>
> Anchorage, AK 99502-1845

**Name of Nominee:** Kristine Nelson

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** NEL son

**Title**: Meteorologist**-**in-Charge

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-13

**Complete office address:**

> Center Weather Service Unit
>
> 700 North Boniface Parkway\
> Anchorage, AK 99506

**Name of Nominee:** Jeffrey Osiensky

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** O shin skee

**Title**: Deputy Chief, Environmental and Scientific Services Division

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-14

**Name of Nominee:** Christopher Strager

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** STRAY ger

**Title**: Deputy Director

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-15

**Complete office address:**

> NOAA/National Weather Service Alaska Region Headquarters\
> 222 West 7th Ave, #23\
> Anchorage, AK 99513-7575
>
> Telephone: (907) 271-5136
>
> **Name of Nominee:** Gregory Pratt

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Pratt

**Title**: Chief, Aviation Systems Development and Deployment Section

**Series and Grade:** ZP-1550-04

**Name of Nominee:** Lynn Sherretz

**Salutation:** Dr.

**Pronunciation:** SHARE itz

**Title**: Chief, Requirements and Program Development Section

**Series and Grade:** ZP-1340-04

**Complete office address:**

> NOAA/ESRL R/GSD5
>
> 325 Broadway
>
> Boulder, CO 80305-3328

**5. Other DoC/National Weather Service Awards:**

Hall - Organization Bronze Medal 1998

Nelson - no previous DOC medals/NOAA Administrator Awards

Osiensky - no previous DOC medals/NOAA Administrator Awards

Pratt - no previous DOC medals/NOAA Administrator Awards

Sherretz - no previous DOC medals/NOAA Administrator Awards

Strager - Silver Medal 1997, National Isaac Cline Award 1998, Alaska
Region Isaac Cline 2005

**6. Current Performance Rating: \"**Pass\" for Hall, Nelson, Osiensky
and Strager. \"Eligible -90\" for Pratt and Sherretz.

**7. Nominator\'s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Laura Furgione, Director

> NOAA/National Weather Service Alaska Region Headquarters\
> 222 West 7th Ave, #23\
> Anchorage, AK 99513-7575
>
> Telephone: (907) 271-5136

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Developing the Volcanic Ash Collaboration Tool provided improved
volcanic ash forecasting capabilities during volcanic eruptions,
essential to preventing volcanic ash damage to lives and property.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For dedicated project management of the Volcanic Ash Collaboration Tool,
a new volcanic ash decision-support and forecasting tool.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

CWSU - Center Weather Service Unit

DOC -- Department of Commerce

FAA- Federal Aviation Administration

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

USGS - United States Geological Survey

VAAC **-** Volcanic Ash Advisory Center

VACT -- Volcanic Ash Collaboration Tool

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department\'s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

The team\'s goal was to manage the development of a tool to locate and
determine the extent and movement of volcanic ash, supporting ***DOC
Goal 1, to provide information and tools to maximize U.S.
competitiveness and promote economic growth for American industries,
workers, and consumers.*** Volcanic ash poses significant risk to the
aviation and marine industries, causing engine failures and reduced
visibility. Risks to the general public include reduced visibility,
multiple health impacts, and personal property damage.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?**

The USGS has the responsibility to determine when an eruption has
occurred; NOAA's responsibility is to issue warnings of volcanic ash
hazards. This requires inter-agency collaboration, a longstanding
challenge that has previously resulted in conflicting information being
disseminated. By conceiving and developing the VACT, the team enabled
collaborative decision-making between the agencies during real-time
forecasting of volcanic eruptions.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The team developed and implemented a project plan to address the needs,
requirements, solution, and research and development for the VACT. The
team made efficient use of time and technology in the development and
testing process. All this was done with a limited budget, in addition to
the team\'s regular workload, and with the constraints imposed by such a
dispersed set of collaborators.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The team\'s efforts resulted in more timely and accurate forecasts from
a coordinated multi-agency response, allowing operational scientists in
the USGS and NOAA/NWS to collaborate in real time with shared
situational awareness. The VACT was operationally tested during the
winter 2006 Augustine volcano eruptions that caused the cancellation of
many airline flights, redeployment of military aircraft, and ashfall in
several communities. USGS scientists repeatedly expressed gratitude to
the nominees for spearheading the development of the VACT, because of
its ability to facilitate coordination amongst agencies during volcanic
events.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The project began in the Spring of 2003, and the last demonstration of
the prototype tool was in January 2006.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

The impact of this real-time, multi-user collaborative capability during
emergency events is enormous for protecting lives, property and the
environment. This enables the issuance of more accurate, timely, and
consistent warnings.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

A single volcanic eruption can interrupt aviation services world-wide,
and create serious threats to health and property. Having conceived and
developed the VACT, the team made it possible to efficiently and
accurately forecast and warn for eruptions, directly benefiting our
mission of protecting lives and property. The tool also shows great
promise to allow interagency coordination for other hazards such as
tsunamis and hurricanes.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

This tool has widespread applicability for collaborative
decision-making. During Augustine\'s eruptions, NOAA/NWS meteorologists
and USGS geophysicists with the Alaska Volcano Observatory utilized the
tool precisely as designed.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

This state-of-the-art development resolves longstanding problems in
real-time communications between multiple government entities. Tools for
rapid decision-making have widespread applicability to agencies
interested in protecting lives, property and the environment. Also, this
tool addresses longstanding problems in real-time volcanic ash
forecasting.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

The team made a major improvement to customer service by increasing the
ability for multiple agencies to collaborate in real-time and make more
accurate decisions for forecasting volcanic ash dispersion and fallout.
Volcanic ash forecasting has a major impact on customers such as the
general public and the aviation and marine communities. USGS and NWS
operational scientists have praised the VACT, both for its
decision-support, as well as having fostered dramatically improved
collaboration between both agencies. Customers are benefiting by more
consistent, timely, and higher quality NWS volcanic ash products and
services.

**WFO Birmingham, AL**

**NWS**

**Nomination #62**

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**1. Type of Award: Bronze**

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Public Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Birmingham, AL

Complete Office Address:

National Weather Service

465 Weathervane Rd.

Calera, AL 35040

Accepting the Award: James Stefkovich Pronounciation: STEF-coe-vich

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

DOC Bronze Medal -- 2005

DOC Bronze Medal -- 2004

DOC Silver Medal -- 2003

DOC Silver Medal -- 2000

DOC Bronze Medal -- 1994

**6. Current Performance Rating: N/A**

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, Address, Phone Number:**

X. William Proenza

Director, National Weather Service Southern Region

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

\(817\) 978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

WFO Birmingham provided outstanding weather services to Alabama and
other NWS offices which mitigated the loss of life and property from
Hurricane Katrina, the worst natural disaster in U.S. history.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For providing weather service and support to the state of Alabama prior
to and after Hurricane Katrina made landfall.

**[II. Justification]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

EOC -- Emergency Operations Center

EM -- emergency manager/management

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Providing weather support is related to Strategic Goal 3, Objective 3.1,
"...to predict changes in the environment...to meet economic, social,
and environmental needs."

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

The WFO understood they were facing one of the worst hurricanes in
history, and responded accordingly. Before, during and after the storm,
staff members consistently placed the NWS mission above their own
concerns by providing critical support and services to local, state and
federal officials, as well as the general public. In addition, staffing
and services were provided to neighboring offices to assist with backup
operations.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

As the NWS state liaison office for Alabama, WFO Birmingham worked
closely with the state government, stationing two staff members 24 hours
a day at the state EOC. Another staff member provided the Governor,
state and federal officials numerous briefings prior to and during the
event, including national television interviews. At the local level, the
WFO held statewide conference calls twice a day, as well as answering
numerous individual calls from the EMs, media and public. After
landfall, four staff members were sent to WFO Mobile for a total of one
week to assist with backup operations, and brought over 600 pounds of
ice (WFO Birmingham staff providing personal ice chests), and 55 gallons
of gasoline for use of affected employees at both WFO Mobile and WFO
Slidell. WFO Birmingham took over web services for WFO Slidell, ensuring
the web site was kept up to date with the latest information. Finally,
with help from Southern Region Headquarters, WFO Birmingham creatively
configured AWIPS as an alternate backup to WFO Slidell.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Due to the efforts of the WFO, people were as prepared as possible for
Katrina. As an example of the impact these efforts had, the Governor of
Alabama highly praised the National Weather Service for "always being
there when we need them."

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}** (Maximum number of
characters for all six questions in this section cannot exceed 1900.)

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

WFO Birmingham's effort to enhance hurricane services is an ongoing
process. Since Hurricane Ivan last year, extensive changes were made to
the office's hurricane operations plan to maximize services to officials
and the media. This included having designated staff assigned to the
state EOC and gathering input from the four WFOs that serve Alabama to
provide media and governmental briefings. Detailed staffing plans were
created to ensure adequate staffing before, during, and after the
hurricane, and office talking points were developed twice a day for a
consistent message from every staff member. During the actual Katrina
event, the staff spent approximately four days forecasting and preparing
for Katrina. In the aftermath, the WFO not only continued operations,
but sent forecasters to WFO Mobile to assist that office with backup
operations.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The performance of the WFO during this catastrophic weather event
demonstrates

that the NOAA/NWS mission of protecting life and property will continue
to be advanced in the WFO's area of responsibility in coming years.
Critical weather information from the WFO has achieved a level of
credibility and accuracy which will enable partners and the general
public to have a high level of trust in this information in coming
years.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Same as short term given above.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The extensive services given to the state and county emergency
management community enabled them to work more effectively with DHS and
FEMA in allocating and positioning resources before, during, and after
Katrina.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

No.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Because of the trust given to the NWS by the highest level of state
government, the WFO will continue to be a vital part of state operations
during high impact events, in addition to strengthening the
relationships with the media and county officials.

WFO Upton, New York

NWS

Nomination #63

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organizational

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS Brookhaven, NY

**Accepting the award:** Michael Wyllie, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** why-lee

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> 175 Brookhaven Avenue
>
> Upton, NY 11973

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** Bronze Medal - Oct 2005

Gold Medal - Sep 2002

Bronze Medal - Oct 2000

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, Office Address, Phone Number:**

Mickey Brown, Deputy Director

NWS Eastern Region

630 Johnson Avenue

Bohemia, NY 11716

Telephone: (631) 244-0102

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Accurate and timely warnings, forecasts, and contact with emergency
managers dramatically reduced economic losses across the New York City
Metropolitan area during the Blizzard of 2006.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For exemplary customer service enabling officials and citizens to take
actions to reduce the impact of the Blizzard of February, 2006.

**[II. Program Text:]{.underline}**

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

EM Emergency Managers

GPRA Government Performance and Results Act

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS NOAA/National Weather Service

NYC New York City

NYC Metro New York City Metropolitan Area

OEM Office of Emergency Management

WFO Weather Forecast Office

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Support the Nation's Commerce with Information for Safe and Efficient
Transportation. The economy of the NYC Metro area is dependent on the
safe and efficient transportation of people and goods to and from NYC.
Any interruption to the transportation system has a major impact on the
economy of the area and the nation. Snow has a major effect on
transportation. Snow removal crews need long lead time to prepare, even
longer when snow is measured in feet. Communication between WFO Upton
and Emergency Managers (EMs) before, during, and after the Blizzard of
2006 was the key to efficient snow removal.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

A record breaking blizzard produced over 2' of snow across the NYC Metro
area February 11-12, 2006. 26.9" of snow fell in Central Park, the most
ever recorded in the Park. Bands of snow dumped more than 3"/hour.
Research in snow banding was put into operation by the Upton staff. A
continuous exchange of information between Upton and EMs ensured a
prompt and timely response to the snow.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Upton notified customers to the potential of a snowstorm 5 days before
the blizzard. Blizzard Watch/Warnings were issued nearly 50 hours before
the storm, well above the national NWS Government Performance and
Results ACT (GPRA) goal of 17 hours. Hundreds of coordination calls were
made to EMs. Many were made before any watch was issued and temperatures
were still in the 50s. During the blizzard, Upton kept EMs informed on
the progress of the storm, providing detailed forecasts on the band of
snow producing snow at a rate of 3"/hour.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

The fact the Blizzard of 2006 was a 1 day news story was testimony to
the efficient work of snow removal crews. The financial district was
able to resume business as usual a day after the largest snowstorm in
NYC recorded history. Tens of millions of dollars were saved to the
nation's economy. Snow removal equipment was pre-positioned, personnel
were ready for long hours, and procedures were modified to account for
record snow well in advance of the first flake. This was possible
because of the communication and partnership Upton maintains with its
EMs.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The potential for a significant snowstorm was highlighted 5 days in
advance; Blizzard Watch/Warnings were issued nearly 50 hours in advance.
Many years have been spent cultivating partnerships and open
communication with EMs.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Tens of millions of dollars in the nation's economy were saved. Due to
excellent coordination, snow was removed from the NYC Metro area the day
following the blizzard allowing Wall Street to open, schools to open,
and mass transit to run.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Credibility and trust in Commerce and cultivation of extremely positive
customer relationships, including our media partners. Janice Huff and
John Marshall, WNBC-TV4, Meteorologists said, "NWS did a great job with
the forecasting the Blizzard of 2006." The Weather Channel's Paul Kocin
was "extremely pleased with the NWS performance."

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Hundreds of state and local briefings for Federal, state, and local
officials and other partners were conducted. Excellent interagency
coordination resulted in superb mitigation planning and allocation of
state and Federal resources. The New York State Department of
Transportation, and the Nassau and Suffolk County Offices of Emergency
Management (OEMs) agreed that, "the NWS forecasts were right on the
money. The office did a great job."

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Snow forecasting techniques on a small scale were taken from research
and validated in operations.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

A major achievement in customer service occurred by enhancing the
legitimacy and authenticity of Commerce through NWS fulfilling its
mission, increasing long-term confidence in NWS warnings and forecasts.
Public sector partners were congratulatory regarding NWS performance.
Elliot Abrams, AccuWeather, said, "I can comment that I thought the
forecasts from the Upton office were excellent, raising blizzard
warnings well in advance, and issuing frequent forecast updates
throughout the storm. The forecasters working before and during the
storm can take great pride in what they accomplished."

**Aviation Weather Center**

**NWS**

**Nomination #64**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS Aviation Weather Center (AWC)

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> Aviation Weather Center
>
> 7220 NW 101^st^ Terrace, Room 101
>
> Kansas City, MO 64153

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** The Aviation Weather
Center received a Bronze Medal for the Collaborative Convective Forecast
Product in October 2000.

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

John A. May, Director

NOAA Aviation Weather Center

7220 NW 101^st^ Terrace, Kansas City, MO 64153

Telephone: (816) 584-7201

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The AWC has improved flight safety and efficiency by transferring,
developing, and maintaining the nation's most comprehensive and widely
recognized aviation weather Internet resource.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For transferring, developing, and operationally maintaining the nation's
most comprehensive and widely recognized aviation weather Internet
resource.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

ADDS -- The "Aviation Digital Data Service" is NOAA's comprehensive
user-friendly Internet aviation weather resource which makes available
to the aviation community text, digital and graphical forecasts,
analyses, and observations of aviation-related weather variables. ADDS
development has been a joint effort of the Research Applications Program
([RAP](http://www.rap.ucar.edu/)) of the National Center for Atmospheric
Research (NCAR) Global Systems Division
([GSD](http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gsd/)) of NOAA\'s Earth System Research
Laboratory ([ESRL](http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/)), and the National Centers
for Environmental Prediction ([NCEP](http://www.ncep.noaa.gov/))
Aviation Weather Center ([AWC](http://aviationweather.gov/)). ADDS can
be found on the Internet at
[http://adds.aviationweather.gov](http://adds.aviationweather.gov/).

AWC -- The "[Aviation Weather Center](http://aviationweather.gov/)", one
of nine centers within the National Centers for Environmental Prediction
(NCEP), provides aviation warnings and forecasts of hazardous flight
conditions at all levels within domestic and international air space.
The AWC has provided technology transfer, operational, and customer
service support for ADDS.

AWRP -- The Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Aviation Weather
Research Program which has funded on-going development of ADDS.

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

ADDS is supporting the nation's commerce with aviation weather
information for enhanced safety and efficient transportation by
providing aviation decision makers and pilots with a comprehensive suite
of key observations, analyses, predictions, and warnings in
user-friendly formats.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

Outstanding customer service, reliable system architecture design, and
development of user-driven improvements by the AWC have resulted in ADDS
becoming "perhaps the prime source of preflight weather information for
most computer-savvy pilots" (Thomas A. Horn, "ADDS Updates", *AOPA Pilot
Magazine*, October 2005).

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

The AWC was responsible for collaboration with AWRP to operationally
implement the ADDS technology in September 2003. Since, the AWC has
replied to thousands of ADDS users. Feedback from these correspondences
has greatly improved ADDS. As a result of outstanding system
architecture design and maintenance provided by the AWC, ADDS has had a
near 100% uptime since becoming operational, and is widely known as
being one the premier sites for timely and reliable aviation weather
data.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

ADDS has become hugely popular within the aviation community. The
customer feedback has been enthusiastic. Most comments are accolades and
statements of gratitude for providing the ADDS services. Several others
have commented on how surprised they were to get such quick responses
and great customer service from a government agency. A couple of
examples from pilots regarding safety are: "ADDS makes flying much
safer;" and "ADDS is a real contribution to safety. It should be
promoted far and wide." Most remarkable it the incredible growth of the
ADDS user base since becoming operational:

Date Avg. Hit/Day Avg. GB/Day Growth

Oct 2003 1.4M 1.6

Oct 2004 3.4M 3.5 130%

Oct 2005 4.5M 5.9 250%

Apr 2006 6.2M 6.8 330%

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Initial collaborative efforts between the AWC and AWRP began in 1996.
The first experimental version of ADDS became available in April 1997.
From 1997 through 2003, the AWC worked closely with the AWRP to develop
the operational system. The joint NWS/FAA Aviation Weather Technology
Board approved ADDS as an operational service in September 2003.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

ADDS is cited as among the best locations for NOAA aviation weather
information on the web.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The success of ADDS is demonstrating a prototype architecture for the
storage and provision aviation weather information for the Next
Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS).

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The ADDS project cost \$1.4 million to implement. However, the savings
in efficiency and safety have been well worth the investment: the FAA
says it has saved more than \$34 million a year on a feature that maps
out icing patterns across the country. Although the site is available to
the public, the majority of users are pilots and dispatchers. It has
even made one user proud to be a taxpayer: \"This is great. It makes me
glad to pay my taxes. Finally, something worthwhile.\"

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

ADDS employs the use of highly interactive displays and applications
which allows pilots and dispatchers to "see" the weather.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Before ADDS, weather information was available in a text format that was
not user-friendly. Now, users can log on to ADDS to check the stats on
adverse aviation weather conditions. They can even track the weather
patterns along their flight routes.

WFO Albany, New York

NWS

Nomination #65

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organizational

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS Albany, NY

> **Accepting the Award:** Eugene P. Auciello

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** awe-see-ello

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

251 Fuller Road

Albany, NY 12203

5.  **Other DoC/National Weather Service Awards:** Bronze Medal - Dec
    1998

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, Office Address, Phone Number:**

Mickey Brown, Deputy Director

NWS Eastern Region

630 Johnson Avenue

Bohemia, NY 11716

Telephone: (631) 244-0102

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Accurate and timely warnings, forecasts, and contact with emergency
responders saved many lives across Warren County, NY, during the flash
flooding of June 13, 2005.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For exemplary customer service enabling public officials and citizens to
take life-saving actions during the Warren County flash flood of June
2005.

**[II. Program Text:]{.underline}**

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

EM Emergency Manager

GPRA Government Performance and Results Act

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWR NOAA Weather Radio, All Hazards

NWS NOAA's National Weather Service

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Society's needs for weather and water information. Thunderstorms in
Warren County, NY, June 13, 2005, produced rainfall totals of 4-5 inches
per hour resulting in catastrophic flash flooding. The challenge for NWS
Albany was to issue flash flood warnings with sufficient lead time to
allow for life-saving actions. Despite devastating damage, no deaths and
only 12 injuries were reported. National Weather Service (NWS)
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) goals were exceeded, with
a warning accuracy of 100% (NWS Goal was 88%), and 68 minute average
lead time (NWS Goal was 54 minutes).

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

NWS Albany forecasters reviewed environmental conditions and radar
rainfall totals to issue a flash flood warning for Warren County at 5:20
PM, June 13, 2005. At 8:36 PM, police reported the Adirondack Northway
washed out, yielding more than 3 hours of lead time to this catastrophic
event. The Adirondack Northway is the main thoroughfare between Albany
and Montreal, Canada. Two additional warnings were issued for the
county. Rainfall totals exceeded 6 inches in the county.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

NWS Albany staff provided excellent service, issuing three flash flood
warnings and five statements. Emergency Managers (EMs) were contacted
immediately to drive home the need for action. EMs acted quickly on the
detailed local warnings. After the flooding, NWS staff offered forecast
and assessment services to Warren County and the New York State
Emergency Management Office.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

John Farrell, Warren County EM: "With the issuance of the first warning,
the county ramped-up emergency operations. The warnings absolutely
helped the county prepare for the flooding." The American Campground, at
Northway Exit 24, evacuated 70 campsites along the Schroon River upon
receiving the warning via NOAA Weather Radio (NWR).

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Flash flood warnings were in effect from 5:20 PM, June 13, 2005 to 6 AM,
June 14, 2005. Support to Warren County continued until June 18, 2005.
Training and research on flash flooding has been conducted for many
years.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Lives were saved. According to the American Campground manager, "When we
heard the NWR tone alert for the Flash Flood Warning, we had all the
beachfront units move to higher ground." The campsites were washed out
by the Schroon River flooding. Without evacuation, deaths would have
occurred. The pre-positioning of first responders ensured quick action
to the Northway wash out, resulting in lives saved.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

NWS gains creditability, trust, and cultivates positive customer
relationships. John Farrell, Warren County EM stated, \"You guys did a
great job. Every time I called, and I called a lot, you were right on
the button with your information. There was one time I called for a
briefing and you told me there would be 2 or 3 episodes during the day.
I briefed our staff, and you were right on with each of them. We
couldn\'t have done it without your help. Congressman Sweeney was up
here and I told him that we talked a lot about partnerships, but it
really does work.\"

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Any federal entity traveling on the Northway was kept out of danger.
Partnerships at all government levels were strengthened.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The environmental factors leading to the flash flooding have been
studied and used to train other forecasters. Application software used
to assist with identifying areas prone to flash flooding was validated.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Warnings and follow-up support strengthened partnerships with local
officials. The local officials conveyed this to congressional
representatives visiting the county. This demonstrates to all, NWS
fulfilling its life-saving mission.

WFO Albany, New York, et al

NWS

Nomination #66

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Joint Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Albany, NY

**Accepting the Award:** Eugene P. Auciello, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** awe-see-ello

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

251 Fuller Road

Albany, NY 12203

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Gray, ME

**Accepting the Award:** Albert Wheeler, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** wheel-er

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

1 Weather Lane

Gray, ME 04039

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Mt. Holly, NJ

**Accepting the Award:** Gary Szatkowski, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** zat-kow-ski

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

732 Woodlane Road

Mt. Holly, NJ 08060

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service

Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center

**Accepting the Award:** Peter Ahnert, Hydrologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** ah-nert

**Complete office address:** Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center

> National Weather Service, NOAA

328 Innovation Boulevard, Suite 330

State College, PA 16803

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service

Northeast River Forecast Center

**Accepting the Award:** Gregg B. Rishel, Hydrologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** rish-el

**Complete office address:** Northeast River Forecast Center

> National Weather Service, NOAA

445 Myles Standish Boulevard

> Taunton, MA 02780

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Taunton, MA

**Accepting the Award:** Robert Thompson, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** tomp-son

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> 445 Myles Standish Boulevard
>
> Taunton, MA 02780

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Upton, NY

**Accepting the Award:** Michael Wyllie, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** why-lee

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> 175 Brookhaven Avenue
>
> Upton, NY 11973

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

WFO Albany: Bronze Medal - Dec 1998

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

> WFO Gray: Silver Medal - Dec 1998

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

> WFO Mt. Holly: Bronze Medal -- Dec 2004

Bronze Medal -- Oct 2000

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

Mid-Atlantic RFC: Bronze Medal - Dec 2005

> Bronze Medal - Dec 2004
>
> Bronze Medal - Oct 2000
>
> Gold Medal - Dec 1996
>
> Northeast RFC: Bronze Medal - Nov 2001
>
> Bronze Medal - Dec 1998

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

WFO Taunton: Bronze Medal - Oct 2005

Bronze Medal - Dec 1998

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

WFO Upton: Bronze Medal - Sep 2005

> Gold Medal - Sep 2002
>
> Bronze Medal - Oct 2000
>
> Gold Medal - Dec 1996

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, Office Address, Phone Number:**

Mickey Brown, Deputy Director

NOAA/NWS Eastern Region

630 Johnson Avenue

Bohemia, NY 11716

Telephone: (631) 244-0102

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Accurate and timely warnings, forecasts, and contact with emergency
responders saved many lives and reduced economic losses across the
Northeast during the severe flooding of October 2005.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For exemplary customer service enabling public officials and citizens to
take life-saving actions during the severe flooding of October 2005.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

DOC Department of Commerce

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS National Weather Service

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

DOC Strategic Goal 3.1-Society's need for weather and water information.
Heavy rain produced unprecedented flooding across the Northeast, October
7-15, 2005. NWS offices faced the challenge of forecasting flood
conditions early enough to issue life saving warnings.

-   **What was the context in which the nominees addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

Rainfall amounts, often underestimated by radar, are critical for
issuing timely and accurate flood warnings. From October 7 through 15,
three back-to-back episodes of prolonged heavy rain resulted in 12 to 24
inches of rainfall, causing severe flooding across the Northeast. The
heavy rain forced thousands of people to evacuate, knocked out
electricity, weakened dams, and made roads impassable. Significant
flooding also occurred in many low lying urban areas, several major
roadways were under 4 to 6 feet of water, and bridges were destroyed.

-   **What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Hundreds of calls were made to emergency management on expected
conditions and the impacts of heavy rain. Employees provided excellent
service despite working many hours and enduring the stress of a
sustained, prolonged event. Flood potential outlooks were issued two
days in advance; flood watches had over 24 hours of lead time; and flood
warning lead times were between 4 to 8 hours. Flash flood watches for
potential dam failures were also issued in Schoharie County, NY, for the
Gilboa Dam; in Cheshire County, NH, for the Highland Lake and Warren
Lake Dams; and in Taunton, MA, for the Whittenton Pond Dam - all
believed to be in weakened states due to the heavy rain.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Advanced warning and detailed localized information prompted officials
to preposition assets, evacuate low-lying areas, and provide immediate
relief to impacted areas. The Governor of New Hampshire declared a state
of emergency and called up 500 National Guard troops for support. In
Alstead, NH, the Emergency Management Director ordered a sizeable
evacuation of residences prior to an entire road embankment collapsing
causing a flash flood that wiped out entire neighborhoods. The
monitoring and evacuation actions saved numerous lives.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Eight days for information on the flooding events. Many years for
extensive outreach sensitizing the public to the impacts from flooding
and assisting emergency planners develop action plans.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Lives were saved. Most of the region had endured one of the driest
periods on record, and the flood threat from a heavy rain event was not
fully appreciated by the public. However, numerous emergency managers
expressed appreciation for the information issued by the NWS up to three
days prior to the event highlighting the danger of heavy rain and
ensuing floods.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Creditability and trust in Commerce and cultivation of extremely
positive customer relationships.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Hundreds of regional, state, and local briefings for Federal, state, and
local officials and other partners were conducted. Excellent interagency
coordination resulted in superb mitigation planning and allocation of
state and Federal resources. According to Ken Davidson, Emergency
Manager, Dutchess County, New York, Department of Emergency Response,
"The service was absolutely excellent. I personally called the Albany
NWS office several times and each question was addressed to my
satisfaction in terms of flooding and anticipated weather." Paul
Marinelli, New England Division of the Corps of Engineers, commented
that service from the NWS was wonderful, adding "this was one of the
best situations from a communications standpoint that I've been
through." In regard to the Whittenton Pond Dam crisis, the Mayor of
Taunton, MA expressed his appreciation of the NOAA/NWS effort, and the
Taunton Emergency Management Director praised the NWS support as
"awesome".

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Updated dam failure techniques and procedures were put the test. Results
were used to improve procedures and operations.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Major achievement in customer service by enhancing legitimacy and
authenticity of Commerce through NWS fulfilling its mission. Increased
long-term confidence in NWS forecasts and warnings brought many more
customers to NWS web sites.

**WFO Amarillo, Texas**

**NWS**

**Nomination #67**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Leadership

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service Office, WFO
Amarillo, TX

**Accepting the Award:** Jose Garcia, Meteorologist-In-Charge

**Pronunciation:** hoe-SAY garr-see-ah

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

WFO Amarillo

1900 English Road

> Amarillo, TX 79108

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** Bronze Medal December 1999

NOAA Unit Citation December 1996

NOAA Unit Citation December 1992

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

X. William Proenza, Director

NWS Southern Region

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Telephone: (817) 978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

In March and April 2006, WFO Amarillo, TX exemplified leadership with
outstanding service and support to emergency managers and wildfire
fighters for dozens of wildfires that threatened life and property.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For leadership in providing services in support of the protection of
life and property during the Texas Panhandle wildfires, March-April
2006.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

Red Flag Warning --A Red Flag Warning is used to warn of an impending,
or occurring Red Flag Event. Its issuance denotes a high degree of
confidence that weather and fuel conditions consistent with local Red
Flag Event criteria will occur in 24 hours or less.

Fire Warning - A warning of a spreading wildfire or structural fire that
threatens a populated area. Evacuation of areas in the fire's path may
be recommended by authorized officials according to state law or local
ordinance.

Dust Storm Warning - Widespread or localized blowing dust reducing
visibilities to 1/4 mile or less. Sustained winds of 25 miles per hour
or greater are usually required.

TXDOT -- Texas Department of Transportation

DOC -- U.S. Department of Commerce

EAS -- Emergency Alert System

EOC -- Emergency Operations Center

EM -- Emergency Manager

DEM -- Division of Emergency Management

RLO -- Regional Liaison Officer

NWR- NOAA Weather Radio

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- National Weather Service

NWEM- Non-Weather Emergency Messages

EAS -- Emergency Alert System

WFO AMA -- NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Amarillo, TX.

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

The contributions of this organization relate to performance outcomes
cited in the DOC 2004-2009 Strategic Plan: "Issue forecasts and warnings
that help protect life and property and enhance the U.S. economy".

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

In March and April of 2006, wildfires in the Texas Panhandle burned well
over a million acres due to extremely dry conditions. On March 12, 2006,
more than 900,000 acres burned and 12 people died in nine separate
rangeland wildfires. These wildfires were noted by the Texas Forest
Service as the largest wildfire acreage ever in the state of Texas.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Fire weather forecasts and red flag watches/warnings were well worded
and timely, with "explosive fire potential" noted. Red flag warnings
were in place for every wildfire event and doubled the normal number of
issuances in a season. NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) Forecast
Office (WFO) in Amarillo's staff was proactive in support of emergency
decision makers, and fire warnings were issued for evacuation of
citizens. The office website was quickly updated with the latest
information on the wildfires.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Local emergency managers spoke highly of the NWS in regards to the
devastating wildfires. Mr. Ken Daughtry, Wheeler County TX Emergency
Management (EM) said, \"The process worked great for us. We were able to
notify the NWS ...within minutes the Fire Warning and evacuation order
were broadcast. Nearly everyone received the information and evacuated
from Mobeetie and Wheeler.\" Similar comments were received from Vernon
Cook, Roberts County, TX Judge when fire threatened the community of
Miami. \"It was crazy around here. The Sheriff was in charge of
notifying the citizens of Miami. He was able to easily get the Fire
Warning and evacuation orders for Miami broadcast through the Emergency
Alert System (EAS) by contacting the Amarillo NWS.\" State Department of
Emergency Management (DEM) and TX Department of Transportation (TXDOT)
officials were also very grateful for the support they received during
the events. David Solis, DEM Regional Liaison Officer (RLO), personally
called and sent a thank you card to the staff. In his card, Mr. Solis
specifically mentioned the \"great information we got during the
conference calls.\"

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

A workshop had just been conducted on February 27, 2006 at WFO AMA to
inform emergency managers and county officials of the new Non-Weather
Emergency Message (NWEM) codes and the procedures necessary to request
Emergency Alert System (EAS) activation on NOAA Weather Radio (NWR).
Also, a fire weather customer meeting was held during the week of the
March 12 event and customers were briefed on the outlook for continued
dry conditions through the spring and early summer. They were alerted to
the increased wildfire potential for March 12. These meetings set the
stage for services which were provided through March and April of 2006.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

WFO Amarillo staff implemented a customer based support for wildfire
operations for this event. The methods and actions utilized for this
event serve as a model for the future concept of operations currently
considered by the NWS.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

WFO Amarillo's leadership in providing firsthand customer support and
tailored forecasts for the Texas panhandle wildfires proves the
viability of a long term vision of future WFOs which are geared to
supporting emergency decision makers during high impact weather and
non-weather events.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes, the National Park Service as well as numerous state agencies such
as the Texas Forest Service, Texas DEM and TXDOT.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. Lessons learned from this event will be documented for future
events.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

For several outbreaks, WFO AMA staff was directly dispatched to the
incident command centers of the TXDOT and to the Hutchinson County EOC
to provide on-site weather briefings. One of the most important services
provided to emergency managers and county judges was the transmission of
Fire Warning evacuation messages for several communities. Services
provided were specific and tactical to ongoing fires in contrast to the
strategic statewide weather support provided by NWS meteorologists at
the State command center in Grandbury, TX, some 300 miles to the
southeast.

**WFO Anchorage**

**Alaska Aviation Weather Unit**

**Center Weather Service Unit**

**NWS**

**Nomination #68**

**NOAA/NWS WFO Anchorage, AAWU/VAAC, CWSU**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Joint Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Names of Nominees:** Weather Forecast Office Anchorage, Alaska
Aviation Weather Unit, Center Weather Service Unit

**Complete office addresses:**

NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office Anchorage

6930 Sand Lake Road

Anchorage, AK 99502-1845

NOAA/NWS Alaska Aviation Weather Unit / Anchorage Volcanic Ash Advisory
Center

6930 Sand Lake Road\
Anchorage, AK 99502-1845

NOAA/NWS Anchorage Center Weather Service Unit

700 North Boniface Parkway\
Anchorage, AK 99506

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** N/A

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator\'s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Laura Furgione, Director

> NOAA/National Weather Service Alaska Region Headquarters\
> 222 West 7th Ave, #23\
> Anchorage, AK 99513-7575
>
> Telephone: (907) 271-5136

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The team\'s dedication provided accurate and timely information to
emergency managers, other agencies and the general public, preventing
volcanic ash damage to lives and property.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For selfless dedication and outstanding customer service during the
prolonged eruptions of Augustine Volcano during the 2005-2006 winter
season.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

AAWU - Alaska Aviation Weather Unit

ARH - Alaska Region Headquarters of NWS

AVO - Alaska Volcano Observatory, a joint program of the USGS, the
Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and the
State of Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys

CWSU - Center Weather Service Unit

DEC - Department of Environmental Conservation, State of Alaska

DHS&EM - Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management

DNR - Department of Natural Resources, State of Alaska

DOC -- Department of Commerce

FAA - Federal Aviation Administration

HHS - Health and Human Services, State of Alaska

NOAA -- National Weather Service

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

Mt. - Mount

SIGMET - Significant Meteorological Advisory, the primary warning
product to the aviation community of the hazard of volcanic ash

USCG - United States Coast Guard

USGS - United States Geological Survey

VAAC - Volcanic Ash Advisory Center. The AAWU serves as one of nine
worldwide VAACs.

WFO -- NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

WC/ATWC - West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department\'s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

The team\'s efforts directly support DOC Goal 1: *Provide the
information and tools to maximize U.S. competitiveness and enable
economic growth for American industries, workers and consumers,* and
Goal 3: *Observe, protect and manage the Earth\'s resources to promote
environmental stewardship.*

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?**

Mt. Augustine volcano poses a very high threat to human health and
safety because of its proximity to Anchorage and its busy ports and
airways. Most of the air cargo between eastern Asia and North America
passes over Alaska\'s volcanoes daily. The potential economic impact of
volcanic ash to the aviation industry is measured in millions of dollars
in terms of potential engine damage, diverted routes and airport
closures. Ash causes respiratory illnesses and various other threats to
safety and the economy.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

The team held news briefings and numerous teleconferences to coordinate
accurate and timely public information. The AAWU issued SIGMETS whenever
volcanic ash was suspended in the atmosphere, and cancelled them once
the hazard terminated. The CWSU advised the FAA air traffic control
center, disseminated pilot reports, and produced meteorological impact
statements. The VAAC issued volcanic ash advisories every six hours for
as long as ash eruptions were expected or confirmed. WFO Anchorage
coordinated with the VAAC on the tracking of volcanic ash clouds and
issued public and marine products. The team refined procedures learned
from this prolonged series of events.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

The team's collaborations created consistent, accurate and timely
messages to the public before and during the extended eruptions of
Augustine Volcano. Since this was the first major volcanic event to
seriously threaten Alaska\'s most populated area since 1992; the team\'s
outstanding performance indicates that strong partnerships that have
been fostered among the various participants through other interactions.
Their ability to keep air traffic flowing safely into/out of Ted Stevens
Anchorage International Airport, the world's fourth busiest cargo
airport, saved millions of dollars in possible lost revenue. The Lead
Dispatcher for Alaska Airlines said that because of the direct support
from the AAWU they "...were able to keep flights flowing in and out of
the airport", and that "many flying (go/no go) decisions were not made
until after consultation with the AAWU".

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Preparations began in late November 2005, a news briefing was held in
late December, and the volcano\'s first eruption occurred January 11,
2006. A four week state of continuous eruption began on January 28, and
the volcano continued minor eruptions and steam clouds until its
activity slowed to low levels in mid-April, 2006.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

The team\'s exceptional collaboration provided the public with timely
and accurate warnings, and \"set the stage\" for future events. Results
indicate the team\'s advanced preparation protected lives and property.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department\'s mission?**

The team\'s efforts created a spirit of cooperation between local, state
and federal partners chartered with volcanic disaster emergency
preparedness.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Other agencies including DEC, DHS&EM, DNR, HHS, FAA, USCG, USGS,
Municipality of Anchorage, and Kenai Peninsula Borough are key players
in this process because of their missions of protecting lives, property
and the environment.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The team tested the Volcanic Ash Collaboration Tool operationally at the
CWSU, AVO, and AAWU/VAAC. This revolutionary tool provided an
experimental solution to the long-standing problem of volcanic ash
forecasting and facilitated team decision making during emergency
situations. In addition, WFO Anchorage created a coordinated website
providing links to information from various agencies
(http://www.volcano.gov).

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

The team's efforts resulted in a highly successful collaborative
customer service process between federal, state and local agencies. The
team held a multi-agency news briefing in which scientists from the
WC/ATWC, ARH and the AVO informed the media on volcanic dangers. During
the eruptions, the team held numerous multi-agency teleconferences to
coordinate consistent, timely public warnings. The team of NWS employees
from the CWSU, AAWU, and WFO Anchorage were key participants,
responsible for issuing public volcanic ash products. Also, employees
from DEC, DHS&EM, DNR, HHS, FAA, USGS, and local municipalities and
boroughs participated in these meetings to ensure accurate and timely
public information.

WFO Binghamton, New York---Flooding Event

NWS

Nomination #69

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organizational

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY

> Accepting the Award: Barbara Watson, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Ms.

**Pronunciation:** what-son

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> WFO Binghamton
>
> Binghamton Regional Airport
>
> 32 Dawes Drive
>
> Johnson City, NY 13790

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** Bronze Medal - Dec 2005

> Bronze Medal - Dec 2004

Bronze Medal - Dec 1999

Gold Medal - Dec 1996

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, Office Address, Phone Number:**

Mickey Brown, Deputy Director

NWS Eastern Region

630 Johnson Avenue

Bohemia, NY 11716

Telephone: (631) 244-0102

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Accurate and timely warnings saved many lives and reduced economic
losses during the severe flooding of April 2-4, 2005, in the upper
Susquehanna and Delaware River Basins.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For exemplary customer service enabling public officials and citizens to
take necessary life-saving actions during the severe flooding of April
2005.

**[II. Program Text:]{.underline}**

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

EM Emergency Manager

ESD Emergency Services Director

NWS National Weather Service

WFO NWS Weather Forecast Office

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Society's need for weather and water information. From April 2-4, 2005,
heavy rain and snowmelt combined to produce a major flood in the
Susquehanna and Delaware River Basins. The Susquehanna at Binghamton, NY
produced its worse flooding in 70 years. A record high crest was
recorded at Beaver Kill, NY along the Delaware. For much of the Delaware
River, it was the second major flood in 6 months and rivaled the
historic flood of 1955. The challenge for WFO Binghamton was to
accurately predict the amount of water from snowmelt and rain running
into the rivers so timely and accurate flood warnings could be issued.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

Binghamton was able to provide river forecasts and flood warnings with
nearly 48 hours lead time by combining the rainfall and snow melt
estimates. This is a difficult forecast to make due to the many
individual weather components needed to make an accurate forecast. The
office monitored the condition of the snow pack, river conditions, and
coordinated the potential flood threat, weeks before flooding occurred.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Binghamton alerted customers to the threat 5 days before flooding
occurred. Flood watches, further heightening awareness, were issued 3
days in advance. Flood warnings, stating major flooding would occur,
were issued with nearly 48 hours lead time. Conference calls were held 3
days before flooding occurred with Emergency Managers (EMs) to discuss
the potential for record flooding. Binghamton had conducted flood
awareness education months before the April floods, directly leading to
an increased response, saved lives, and mitigation of damage.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

With 48 hours notice major flooding would occur in Binghamton, the
Broome County Emergency Services Director (ESD) ordered a 6 foot
protective earthen berm built around Lourdes Hospital. A forecasted
crest of 21' would have inundated the hospital, requiring a complete
evacuation and millions of dollars in damage. The river crested at
20.7', but the berm kept the river out of the hospital, eliminating the
need for evacuations and saving the hospital from damage.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Five days for information on the flooding. Many years of extensive
outreach sensitizing the public to the impacts from floods and assisting
emergency planners develop action plans.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Lives were saved and damage was minimized. The Broome County ESD stated,
"If it weren't for NWS's river forecasts and close coordination with
hospital officials, Lourdes Hospital would have been closed." The Pike
County, PA EM stated, "Early warning from the conference calls allowed
EMs to spread the word that this would be worse than (Tropical Storm)
Ivan, so people prepared." The calls helped frame the event in many EMs'
minds and empowered them to take decisive actions. The Sullivan County,
NY, EM stated NWS forecasts were "excellent" and the conference calls
were "exceptional." The Delaware County EM stated, "Excellent job! Early
warning saved lives and helped people prepare and save what property
they could."

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

    Creditability and trust in Commerce and cultivation of extremely
    positive customer relationships.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Briefings for emergency management, U.S. Geological Survey, Susquehanna
River Basin Commission, and Delaware River Basin Commission, and others
were conducted. Excellent interagency coordination resulted in superb
mitigation planning and allocation of state and Federal resources.
Pennsylvania Governor, Edward G. Rendell, wrote a letter to President
Bush stating, "National Weather Service personnel...were instrumental in
helping to keep our county emergency managers prepared for the rising
waters."

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

    Techniques used to quantity snowmelt runoff were validated.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Major achievement in customer service. Months before the floods,
Binghamton assisted in flood mitigation education at a workshop
sponsored by local EMs. In attendance were executives from Lourdes
Hospital and Broome County. These executives developed an action plan
based on what they learned at the workshop. The action plan was executed
during the April floods and saved the hospital.

WFO Binghamton, NY -- Wind Event

NWS

Nomination #70

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organizational

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS WFO Binghamton, NY

**Accepting the Award:** Barbara Watson, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Salutation:** Mrs.

**Pronunciation:** what-son

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

Binghamton Greater Regional Airport

> 32 Dawes Road

Johnson City, NY 13790

6.  **Other National Weather Service Awards:** Bronze Medal - Dec 2005

Bronze Medal - Dec 2004

Bronze Medal - Dec 1999

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, Office Address, Phone Number:**

Mickey Brown, Deputy Director

NWS Eastern Region

630 Johnson Avenue

Bohemia, NY 11716

Telephone: (631) 244-0102

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Accurate and timely warnings for a severe thunderstorm and continuing
community safety and preparedness outreach saved lives when a storm blew
the roof off an elementary school in Endicott, NY.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For exemplary customer service enabling school officials to take
life-saving actions from damaging winds caused by a severe thunderstorm
on June 2005.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWR NOAA Weather Radio, All Hazards

NWS National Weather Service

WFO NWS Weather Forecast Office

VADM Vice Admiral

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Department of Commerce Strategic Goal 3.1 - Society's needs for weather
and water information. Damaging winds from severe thunderstorms pose a
significant threat to citizens of central New York. These storms do not
develop classic weather radar characteristics of storms that produce
large tornadoes. Therefore, these storms are harder to identify and warn
for. Such was the case on June 6, 2005, when strong winds from a severe
thunderstorm tore the roof off the Endicott, NY elementary school.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

Through training and applied research, NOAA/National Weather Service
(NWS) Forecast Office Binghamton accurately accessed the severe weather
threat and delivered timely and accurate warnings. Through extensive
outreach to the community, Binghamton ensured the warnings would be
received and understood and appropriate actions would be taken to save
lives.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

Binghamton used best practices for severe weather operations and
community outreach to increase warning timeliness and accuracy and
community response. Binghamton conducted detailed severe weather
preparedness programs for community planners. Drills and exercises were
conducted so customers could test plans and procedures. On June 6, 2005,
a Severe Thunderstorm Warning was issued for Broome County at 1241 PM.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Drills and exercises were conducted so customers could test plans and
procedures. The principal of the Endicott, NY elementary school received
the warning via NOAA Weather Radio (NWR). He evacuated the 340 students,
faculty, and staff to designated storm-safe areas of the school.
Twenty-two minutes later, strong winds from a severe thunderstorm tore
off a large part of the roof over the school's kindergarten classrooms.
Since the children and staff had been moved out of harms way, no deaths
or injuries occurred. The principal stated, "Over 20 minutes of advanced
warning allowed us to execute our severe weather safety plan, which in
turn saved lives and prevented injuries." Broome County Emergency
Services Director, Mike Aswad said, "NWS warnings no doubt prevented
injuries and saved lives. This was a fast moving dangerous storm."

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The event lasted for several hours. Years were spent on training,
drills, and event simulations, and improvements to operations that led
to a successful warning process. Many years of community outreach and
education were needed to establish community preparedness plans.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Lives were saved. VADM Conrad Lautenbacher, U.S. Navy (Retired), NOAA
Administrator, used this story in a congressional briefing as an example
of how NWR can save lives. Congressman Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), Chair
of the House Science Committee stated, \"While I have always been a big
supporter of the NWR program, at no time has its importance been clearer
than on June 6, when severe weather ripped through Charles F. Johnson
Elementary. The prompt warning and emergency information Principal Tomic
received from his NWR enabled him to immediately implement his safety
plan. His quick action no doubt saved the lives of our most precious
resources - our children. I hope that this serves as a lesson for others
to get a NWR, have a safety plan, practice the plan and take action when
alerted to severe weather.\"

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Through this success story, NWS will be able to further its mission of
saving lives and property from hazardous weather through the use of NWR
and community partnerships.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is working through state
and local governments to increase community preparedness and mitigation
of disasters. The successful use of NWR, NWS warnings and forecasts, and
severe weather safety plans to save lives also supports FEMA's efforts.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The environmental conditions leading up to the severe thunderstorms have
been used to train other forecasters.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

This was a customer service success that demonstrated how NWS timely and
accurate warnings can work along with NWR and prepared communities to
save lives from hazardous weather.

**WFO Honolulu, Hawaii**

**Data Collection Office Lihue, Hawaii**

**Data Collection Office Hilo, Hawaii**

**NWS**

**Nomination #71**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Joint Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** WFO Honolulu

DCO Lihue

DCO Hilo

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> WFO Honolulu
>
> 2525 Correa Road Suite 250
>
> Honolulu, HI 96822

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** None covering this period.

**6. Current Performance Rating:** Not Applicable - Group

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

> R. Jeffrey LaDouce
>
> Director, NOAA NWS Pacific Region
>
> Pacific Guardian Center, Mauka Tower
>
> 737 Bishop Street, Suite #2200
>
> Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-3213
>
> Telephone: (808) 532-6416

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

WFO Honolulu provided exemplary customer service to Hawaii during
February-April 2006 supporting the effective allocation and placement of
resources for disaster mitigation and response by emergency management.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For outstanding customer service rendered during the extended
flooding/severe weather event of February 19 -- April 2, 2006 in the
state of Hawaii.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

CD Civil Defense

DCO Data Collection Office

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

NWS National Weather Service

POD Probability of Detection (number of warnings issued divided by the
number of events)

USGS United States Geological Survey

WFO Weather Forecast Office

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

WFO Honolulu, DCO Lihue and DCO Hilo are tasked with serving society\'s
needs for weather and water information to protect lives and property.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

WFO Honolulu provided accurate and timely weather warnings, forecasts,
and information to the public, media and emergency management community
over a 6 week period in which the state experienced record breaking
rainfall, catastrophic flooding, a dam break, tornadoes, hail, heavy
snowfall, and high winds. Seven deaths resulted from the dam break.
Rainfall records were set at 38 locations across the state. Damage costs
reached hundreds of millions of dollars.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

WFO Honolulu issued over 500 non-routine products including 1 tornado
warning, 11 severe thunderstorm warnings, 121 special marine warnings, 3
severe thunderstorm watches, 113 flash flood warnings, winter storm
watches and warnings, and high wind warnings. Tornado warning lead time
was 5 minutes. Severe thunderstorm lead time averaged 13 minutes with a
POD of 100%. Flash Flood lead time averaged over 70 minutes with a POD
of 96%.

WFO Honolulu briefed state and county CD officials and other emergency
responders via daily conference calls throughout the event. WFO Honolulu
staff, in concert with staff at DCOs Lihue and Hilo, continuously
coordinated with county officials regarding the issuance and expiration
of each watch and warning. WFO Honolulu partnered with the USGS to
retrieve data from temporary gauges installed to monitor the potential
failure of 4 reservoirs on Kauai. DCO Lihue proactively arranged
regional support to collect critical information which otherwise would
have been lost.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms[?]{.underline}**

WFO Honolulu was praised by CD, media and the general public.  Based
upon the office's service, emergency responders and relief agencies
efficiently managed personnel and schedules and positioned resources in
anticipation of and in response to multiple hazardous weather and
flooding conditions. Mark Marshall, CD Coordinator on Kauai said, "The
National Weather Service was great during this whole thing. They gave me
all of the information I needed when I needed it." A KGMB-TV news anchor
on two separate occasions stated, "We owe the people over at the
National Weather Service a great deal of appreciation for the great job
they have done."

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Critical life-saving services by WFO Honolulu, DCO Lihue and DCO Hilo
were provided continuously during the 6-week period from February 19
through April 2, 2006.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

WFO Honolulu and DCOs Lihue and Hilo saved lives, mitigated economic
losses and societal impacts, increased public preparedness, and
reinforced the trust and respect for NOAA and the National Weather
Service by the emergency managers, media and general public.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The longevity and severity of the event was unlike anything observed
since 1951. Federal, state, and county officials are partnering to
assess all of the dams in Hawaii to mitigate the potential of future
failures; conducting surveys for the placement of additional stream and
rain gages; and reviewing ways to improve Flood Plain Management
Services and Hawaii Water Systems Technical Study programs.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

WFO Honolulu and DCOs Hilo and Lihue coordination and assistance
activities during and following the event with USGS, FEMA, county and
state agencies including CD will have long range impacts on future,
improved disaster preparedness and mitigation plans for these agencies.
Bottom line -- fewer lives will be lost and property destroyed as a
result of the improved plans.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

As a direct result of coordinated actions among WFO Honolulu, USGS and
Kauai County CD, additional water height instrumentation was placed on 4
potentially-failing reservoirs. The real-time monitoring capability
allowed WFO Honolulu staff during the event and following it to closely
monitoring life-threating conditions. These real-time installations had
never been done before in Hawaii and will have long-lasting benefits.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

KSSK radio, with the largest listening audience in Hawaii, on March 29
reported "The National Weather Service has really stayed on top of this
and have done a great job keeping us informed." In a television
interview, a man standing in water up to his knees said, "They told us
this was coming last week." The continuous superior customer service
across the spectrum of customers by WFO Honolulu and DCOs Hilo and Lihue
greatly enhanced the effectiveness of the watches, warnings, and
advisories issued - people knew what to expect and were prepared.

**WFO North Platte, Nebraska, et al**

**NWS**

**Nomination #72**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Joint Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Organization being nominated:** WFO North Platte, Nebraska

**Individual to receive award for Organization:** John Stoppkotte

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** STOP -- kot -- e

**Complete office address:** NOAA National Weather Service

> 5250 E. Lee Bird Drive
>
> North Platte, NE 69101-2473

**Name of Organization being Nominated:** WFO Goodland, Kansas

**Individual to receive award for Organization:** Scott Mentzer

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Mint - Sir

**Complete office address:** NOAA**/**National Weather Service Forecast
Office

> 920 Armory Road
>
> Goodland, KS 67735-9273

**Name of Organization being nominated:** WFO Aberdeen, South Dakota

**Individual to receive award for Organization:** Ken Harding

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Har -ding

**Complete office address:** NOAA National Weather Service

> 824 Brown County 14 South
>
> Aberdeen, SD 57401-9311

**Name of Organization being nominated:** WFO Omaha/Valley, Nebraska

**Individual to receive award for Organization:** Steve Schurr

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Sure

**Complete office address:** NOAA National Weather Service

> 6707 North 288^th^ Street
>
> Valley, NE 68064-9443

**Name of Organization being nominated:** WFO Hastings, Nebraska

**Individual to receive award for Organization:** Mike Lewis

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Lou - es

**Complete office address:** NOAA National Weather Service

> 6365 Osborne Drive West
>
> Hastings, NE 68901-9163

**Name of Organization being Nominated:** WFO Sioux Falls, South Dakota

**Individual to receive award for Organization:** Greg Harmon

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** Har - mun

**Complete office address:** NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

> 26 Weather Lane
>
> Sioux Falls, SD 57104-0198

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

WFO North Platte: DOC Bronze Medal for warning services (2001)

WFO Goodland: Hammer Award (1999)

> DOC Bronze Medal (1998)
>
> Unit Citation (1997)
>
> NWS Modernization Award (1996)

WFO Aberdeen: DOC Bronze Medal for warning services (2000)

WFO Valley/Omaha: DOC Silver Medal for warning services (2005)

WFO Hastings: Hammer Award (1998)

WFO Sioux Falls: DOC Silver Medal for warning services (1999, 2004)

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Gary Foltz, Deputy Regional Director

NOAA/NWS Central Region

7220 NW 101st Terrace

Kansas City, MO 64153

Telephone: (816) 891-8914

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Accurate and timely watch/warning information preceding and during the
storm minimized loss of life alerting the public to the storm\'s
potential during one of the busiest travel periods of the year.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For providing exemplary foresight by relaying life-saving information
prior to and during the Ice Storm and Blizzard of 27-28 November 2005.

**[II. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

**[CWA:]{.underline}** County Warning Area

**[EM:]{.underline}** Emergency Manager or Management

**[NOAA:]{.underline}** National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

**[NWR:]{.underline}** NOAA Weather Radio All Hazards

**[NWS:]{.underline}** National Weather Service

**[WFO:]{.underline}** NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

**[DOC:]{.underline}** Department of Commerce

**[FEMA:]{.underline}** Federal Emergency Management Agency

**[HWO:]{.underline}** Hazardous Weather Outlook

**[GFE:]{.underline}** Graphical Forecast Editor

**[GPRA:]{.underline}** Government Performance and Results Act

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**[What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?]{.underline}**

A winter storm whose magnitude was unparalleled over decades, resulted
in hundreds of miles of road closures, and damages exceeding 20 million
dollars during November 27^th^ and 28^th^, 2005. The nominees provided
high levels of service for 7 consecutive days, including timely and
concise watches up to 36 hours prior to the event; warnings 24 hours in
advance (NWS GPRA Goal is 15 hours) and almost continuous statements and
forecasts for the long-lived storm.

NOAA's Strategic Plan, Mission Goal "***serve society's needs for
weather and water information"*** and ***DOC Goal 3 to "Observe,
protect, and manage the Earth's resources to promote environmental
stewardship" including "Advance understanding and predict changes in the
Earth's environment to meet America's economic, social, and
environmental needs."***

**[What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?]{.underline}**

These WFOs demonstrated the ability to inform the public through various
outlets including a wide array of media, contact with state and local
officials and NWR.

**[What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?]{.underline}**

HWOs highlighted the potential for ice, blizzard, power outages and
impassable roadways four days prior to the event. As the storm evolved,
blizzard and winter storm warnings were issued 24 hours in advance. A
constant dialogue was established between the offices, state and local
officials and members of the media. Several years of relationship
building with these partners facilitated a high degree of understanding
and trust. The continuous flow of information weeks after the storm
assisted in rescue and power restoration efforts.

**[What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?]{.underline}**

Highlighting the events four days prior and the constant flow of
information during and after allowed the public and highway officials to
prepare during a time of holiday travel, minimizing loss of life.

Quote from The **Grand Island Independent**: \"The National Weather
Service forecast this storm for days, and even a week, ahead of time.
This allowed holiday travelers to plan their return trips home to avoid
the storm and fortunately, it appears many did so.\"\
\
The **EM in Holt** **County, NE** said**,**: \"You did an awesome job of
informing us. On a scale of 1 to 10, you were a 10!\"

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**[How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?]{.underline}**

The blizzard affected much of the Great Plains for three days. The
forecast and warning service encompassed a 7-day period. The flow of
information continued as much as two weeks post event to brief local and
state EMs, and to assist in their efforts to restoration power and
return the flow of commerce.

**[What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department=s mission?]{.underline}**

This success validates NOAA's mission to warn and protect, and ensures
strong commitment by the individual WFOs to work as one, resulting in
building stronger alliances and trust, culminating in the continued
savings of life and the reduction of losses.

**[What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department=s mission?]{.underline}**

The overall accomplishment of timely and accurate warning service
delivered through a variety of local, state and federal entities,
showcases the NWS ability to provide world class service as a
synergistic team. This serves to foster unparalleled trust and
understanding of our mission ***"for the protection of life and property
and the enhancement of the national economy."***

**[Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?]{.underline}**

This success highlights the agency's ability to collaborate efficiently
and effectively with local, county, state and federal entities. The
visibility of such success will extend to others outside of this group
which will promote stronger and more far reaching ties to NOAA and the
NWS.

**[Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?]{.underline}**

The ice storm and blizzard was archived by the WFOs to be utilized for
collaborative research and additional training. Use of NWS approved chat
software facilitated timely interoffice collaboration and enhanced the
relay of time critical observations. The Graphical Hazards Generator
added to collaboration efficiency by allowing forecasters to quickly
view hazards created by adjacent offices.

**[Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative support?
If so, how?]{.underline}**

The long lead-time and continuous flow of information to the public
through various entities has furthered mutual trust and timely
coordination with those entities which will be used in outreach events
to expand the range of partners. Post-storm analysis by various agencies
has initiated new relationships between those agencies to promote a
quicker and more efficient flow of information.

**WFO Nashville, Tennessee**

**NWS**

**Nomination #73**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Public Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Nashville, TN

Complete Office Address:

National Weather Service

500 Weather Station Road

Old Hickory, TN 37138

Accepting the Award: Larry Vannozzi, Meteorologist-in-Charge

Pronunciation: vah-NO-zee

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

DOC Bronze Medal -- 1998

NOAA Unit Citation -- 1974

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, Address, Phone Number:**

X. William Proenza

Director, National Weather Service Southern Region

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

\(817\) 978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

WFO Nashville warned an average of 14 minutes in advance for 11
Tennessee tornadoes on April 7, 2006. Lives were saved as an F3 tornado
moved across Gallatin and Volunteer State Community College.

**I. [Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For providing proactive and life saving warning services during the
April 7, 2006 tornado outbreak in middle Tennessee.

**II. [Justification]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 -- Definitions]{.underline}**

WFO -- Weather Forecast Office

EMA -- County Emergency Management Agency Directors

TEMA -- Tennessee Emergency Management Agency

OEM -- Nashville Office of Emergency Management

Lead Time -- The amount of time a warning is issued before a tornado
actually occurs.

GPRA -- Government Performance and Results Act

Graphicast -- a graphical presentation of a short term weather forecast.

**[Section 2 -- Award Justification]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Provision of critical warnings is directly related to the Department's
Strategic Goal 3, Objective 3.1, to "advance understanding and predict
changes in the Earth's environment to meet America's economic, social,
and environmental needs."

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

Two issues complicate NOAA/National Weather Service (NWS)Weather
Forecast Offcie (WFO) Nashville's warning program - hilly terrain and
heavily wooded areas. Since storm spotting is very challenging,
forecasters often must rely on their interpretation of Doppler radar to
provide early warnings. Warning operations were also complicated by
electrical and phone line outages.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

The WFO proactively ensured effective warning communication. This
included messages to Emergency Management Agencies (EMAs) to highlight
significant severe weather risk; conference call briefings for EMAs,
Tennessee EMA and other state/local officials before major storms; an
800 MHz radio to coordinate with the Nashville Office of Emergency
Management (OEM); and an amateur radio for volunteers to relay weather
information and provide backup communications. The WFO completed
extensive training, redesigned its severe weather operations, and issued
new products (Graphicasts and graphical Hazardous Weather Outlooks) to
provide effective warning services.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

WFO Nashville's average lead time for all 11 tornadoes was 14 minutes,
which exceeds the national Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
tornado lead-time goal by one minute. Volunteer State Community College
had 12 minutes advance notice before the tornado struck, which enabled
officials to send the warning to all buildings via intercom and activate
their safety plan. Despite 450 people on campus, only one
college-related person was injured when a tornado struck (most campus
buildings were damaged). The rest of Gallatin, where 8 deaths occurred,
had 14-17 minutes of lead time. Davis Nolan (ABC-TV meteorologist)
wrote, "...there would be many more fatalities without their (NWS)
efforts... our lives are a whole lot safer because of them." FOX-TV
weathercaster Cindy Tremblay wrote, "KUDO\'S to all of you. You all did
a remarkable job..." Scott Harris (Nashville OEM) said, "You guys were
excellent!"

**[Section 3 -- Additional Information]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

WFO Nashville's performance resulted from years of training, outreach,
and recent internal operational restructuring. This specific event
occurred in a 36-hour period.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The WFO's performance during the tornadoes shows that the NOAA/NWS
mission of protecting life/property to support the Department's
Strategic Goal 3 will continue to advance in Tennessee. Positive media
comments reflect well on NOAA/NWS. Better rapport with the media and
emergency managers improves the WFO partnership with these groups and
encourages them to work closely to convey life-saving warnings to the
public.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Short-term impacts will continue into the long-term. WFO warnings
achieved a level of credibility/accuracy which enables customers to
highly trust this information in the coming years. Increased awareness
of NOAA/NWS warning value will lead to improved public preparedness.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes. Information given to Homeland Security/Federal Emergency Management
Agency and state/local emergency managers enhanced preparation for the
storms and improved disaster response.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The application of graphical techniques to short term weather forecasts
and hazardous weather outlooks improved the ability of users to quickly
interpret the information being provided.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

The WFO improved customer service in this event by meeting needs
expressed by 10 local TV meteorologists. The WFO issued 61 Severe
Weather Statements (one per 10 minutes) to give customers fast updates
of storm movement. It sent 78 Local Storm Reports to alert customers to
ground truth reports of tornadoes, damage, and hail. This allowed TV
meteorologists to increase credibility of NWS warnings and prompt
viewers to take safety precautions. The WFO issued new products such as
Graphicasts and graphical Hazardous Weather Outlooks to highlight the
tornado risk and improve web-based forecasts for customers.

**WFO Paducah, Kentucky**

**NWS**

**Nomination #74**

**Nominee:** Organization -- **[WFO Paducah, Kentucky]{.underline}**

Complete office address: NOAA's National Weather Service

> Weather Forecast Office Paducah
>
> Telephone (270) 744-6440, Ext. 642

**Person accepting the award on behalf of the office:**

Beverly Poole, Meteorologist-in-Charge, pronunciation as written.

**Past Awards:**

2005 Silver Medal

2004 Gold Medal

2003 Bronze Medal

2000 Silver Medal

1997 Bronze Medal

1996 Unit Citation

**Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone number:**

Lynn P. Maximuk, Director

NOAA's National Weather Service Central Region Headquarters

Telephone: (816) 891-8914

***[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}***

WFO PAH provided a 15 minute lead time to the strongest intensity
tornado to strike the United States in 2005 allowing citizens of
Madisonville, KY to put safety plans into action. The result--not a
single life was lost.

**[Certificate Citation:]{.underline}**

For providing life-saving warning service during the November 15
Madisonville, KY F4 tornado - the strongest to strike the United States
in 2005.

**Justification:**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

CO County

CWA County Warning Area

DOD Department of Defense

EM Emergency Manager

EMA Emergency Management Agency

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

FT Fort

GPRA Government Performance and Results Act

LT Lead time

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWR NOAA Weather Radio

NWS NOAA's National Weather Service

TV Television

WFO PAH NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office, Paducah, Kentucky

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**[What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or Strategic Plan?]{.underline}**

Department of Commerce Strategic Goal 3. An F4 tornado (devastating
tornado on the Fujita Tornado Scale with estimated winds of 207 to 260
miles per hour) roared across the major populated area of Madisonville,
KY during the afternoon of November 15, 2005, cutting a 15 mile
devastation path 800 yards wide through the city. Yet, due to a 15
minute tornado warning lead time, emergency management, first
responders, school officials, hospitals, and the public took immediate
live-saving actions. The challenge was to provide timely and accurate
forecasts and warnings for high impact events, so emergency management
and the public could prepare and respond quickly when critical weather
threatens.

**[What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?]{.underline}**

Focused teamwork between staff members helped forecasters diagnose the
potential of the severe storms' historic proportions well before the
afternoon began. Collaboration with neighboring NWS offices was used to
make consistent forecasts throughout the region two days in advance.
Foresight of the severe weather significance allowed proactive actions
to advise well ahead of the event.

**[What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?]{.underline}**

Emergency Managers were briefed through live teleconferences two days in
advance that provided supporting maps and analysis to further emphasize
detail and storm severity. Early morning briefings focused on school
superintendents alerting them of the possibility of severe weather later
in the day. Some schools seized the opportunity to run tornado
***drills*** ***that morning*** to ensure students ***knew what to do
that afternoon*** should warnings be issued. As severe weather began,
unique means of communication were employed including ***E:Spotter*** to
relay information directly from field spotters to WFO PAH assisting in
spotting, tracking, and verifying ground truth of the storms, thereby
improving lead times. The average lead time for the Tornado Warnings
issues was 15 minutes; exceeding the NWS GPRA goal 13 minutes.

**[What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?]{.underline}**

Advanced warning allowed officials and the public to take life saving
actions, resulting in no fatalities.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**[How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?]{.underline}**

The F4 tornado was on the ground for 33 minutes. Extensive preparedness
outreach and training over 12 years sensitizing the public to impacts of
severe weather and assisting emergency planners develop safety action
plans.

**[What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the Bureau and/or Department's mission?]{.underline}**

Lives were saved! People heeded NWS warnings and took action. In
response to the storms, ***40,000*** ***NOAA Weather Radios were
purchased through partnerships with Midland Electronics and TV Media in
this area, placed in homes and businesses, making the Madisonville to
Evansville Area the number 1 NOAA Weather Radio market in the Nation!***
**[WFO PAH initiated this NWR campaign,]{.underline}** partnering in
programming several thousands of new radios in mall campaigns for
citizens of the area. This served as a NWS best practice, and has been
exercised in other NWS County Warning Areas across the Midwest.

**[What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
Bureau and/or Department's mission?]{.underline}**

Creditability and increasing trust in Commerce, and cultivation of
extremely positive customer relationships among the NWS, EMA, media and
the public.

**[Does the accomplishment affect other Bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?]{.underline}**

Success reinforced trust and active involvement with FEMA, National
Guard, American Red Cross, DOD, and EMA. Team efforts and well developed
partnerships pulled all agencies together before, during, and through
the aftermath of the storm. The Kentucky Division EMA Area 2 Manager
proclaimed, "Paducah did a top notch job this event!"

**[Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?]{.underline}**

A dramatic and unprecedented expansion of NOAA Weather Radio.

**[Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative support?
If so, how?]{.underline}**

Hundreds of briefings and interviews were conducted for decision makers
and the media. Accomplishments had a significant impact on promotion of
customer services and products as a result of many positive comments
made by Hopkins County EMA Director, Hopkins Co. Judge Executive, key
officials and media regarding the high value of services and products
for major weather events. The Hopkins Co. EM Director summed it up by
stating, "NWS Paducah notifications for this event were outstanding and
made a real difference in our local preparation and planning for this
violent tornado, and [no doubt]{.underline} had a lot to do with why
there were no fatalities."

**WFO Phoenix, Arizona**

**NWS**

**Nomination #75**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Acceptor:** Anton Haffer

**Salutation:** Mr.

**Pronunciation:** HAFF er

**Title**: Meteorologist-In-Charge

**Series and Grade:** GS-1340-15

**Name of Nominee:** National Weather Service, NOAA, WFO Phoenix

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service, NOAA

WFO Phoenix

1521 N Project Drive, PAB 500

Tempe, AZ 85281-1206

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** DoC - Bronze Medal October
2002

> DoC - Silver Medal November 2001

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Vickie Nadolski, Regional Director

NOAA/NWS Western Region Headquarters

125 S. State Street, Room 1205

Salt Lake City, UT 84138

801-524-5122

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The staff of WFO Phoenix greatly facilitated life-saving response
efforts of local health and emergency services agencies by providing
advance information on excessively hot record temperatures.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For life-saving Excessive Heat Warning services provided to Phoenix,
Arizona, during the extreme heat episode of June 29 through July 21,
2005.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

**NOAA:** National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

**NWS:** National Weather Service

**WFO:** Weather Forecast Office; NOAA's National Weather Service's
field office responsible for weather and hydrological forecasts and
warnings to protect property, people and economy of the nation.

**Excessive Heat:** Excessive heat results from a combination of high
temperature (significantly above normal ranges) and high humidity. At
this high level of combined factors, the human body cannot maintain
proper internal temperatures and may experience heat related illness,
including death.

**EPA**: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

DOC Strategic Goal 3: *Observe, protect, and manage the Earth's
resources to promote environmental stewardship*

The goal was to create enhanced, specific, science-based procedures to
identify weather conditions that pose the greatest threat to life and
convey the threat to local agencies with as much lead time as possible.
The challenge was exacerbated by Phoenix's hot summers. The standard
National Weather Service (NWS) heat program is not appropriate in this
area.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

The deadly heat wave began with a significant leap of daily
temperatures. The NWS Weather Forecast Office (WFO) staff foresaw the
uncharacteristic increase as a threat to life. Agencies providing
shelter and life-sustaining medical and food services required credible
information to prepare for and respond to the heat disaster. Succinct
statements and warnings conveyed the imminent threat to life.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

For more than five years, the WFO nurtured a partnership with the
University of Delaware to implement an enhanced Phoenix-centric warning
program to alert local residents of conditions that pose the greatest
threat to life. Ten days before the peak of the heat wave, the WFO
accomplished an aggressive campaign with the media and local action
agencies to disseminate information to raise public awareness as to what
protective actions needed to be taken to survive the heat.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Local and national media highlighted the heat wave, which resulted in 54
heat-related deaths in less than one month (normal is 32 per year).
Health and emergency service agencies distributed NWS products via their
internal networks and issued guidelines on preventing health risks due
to high heat. Cooling centers were opened, and additional street patrols
were implemented to transport people at risk to cooling shelters. Susan
Gerard, Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services, said,
"Without the hard work and dedication of the Phoenix Forecast Office
staff, the number of deaths would have certainly been higher. I commend
their exceptional services and partnership in saving lives."

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

Research of the relationship between summer temperatures and
heath-related deaths in Phoenix began in 1999, and by means of a
partnership among the University of Delaware, a local utility, as well
as local and state government agencies. The WFO Excessive Heat Warning
Program, tailored to results of the research, began in 2001. The Program
was refined to include additional weather parameters in succeeding
summers including 2005.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

    The accomplishment demonstrated the value of continually customizing
    and updating the Phoenix Excessive Heat Warning Program. As a
    result, refinements will continue in the short-term and the
    credibility of the Program in the minds of the Phoenix customers
    will continue on the ascendancy.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The success of the Phoenix Program demonstrates the importance of
tailoring NWS procedures to stimulate a local call to action which
reflects the conditions of the local area -- even in extreme climates.
This supports the NOAA/NWS plan to implement similar programs across the
Nation during the next five years.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Lessons learned from the Phoenix experience have already been integrated
into a forthcoming EPA publication that provides guidelines for dealing
with extreme heat events.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The results of the partnerships nurtured in Phoenix represent a model to
refer to as the importance of addressing the impacts of excessive heat
events. Recent data indicate heat-related deaths to be the most
significant cause of weather-related deaths.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

The Heat Wave of 2005 demonstrated that local agencies' response plans
and guidelines in Phoenix were out of date. By stepping up to the plate
with its enhanced warning program, the WFO's aggressive actions served
as a role model for other agencies to follow. As a result, a major
effort is underway to rewrite the guidelines, and improve the local
response plans used by state and local agencies serving Phoenix.

**WFO Portland, Oregon**

**Northwest River Forecast Center**

**NWS**

**Nomination #76**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Public Service

**4. Name of Nominees:** NOAA's National Weather Service Forecast
Office, Portland, OR

**Accepting the Award:** Stephen Todd, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** as written

> NOAA's National Weather Service Northwest River Forecast Center,
> Portland, OR

**Accepting the award**: Harold Opitz, Hydrologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** O-Pits

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> WFO Portland and Northwest River Forecast Center
>
> 5241 NE 122^nd^ Avenue
>
> Portland, OR 97230

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** Silver Medal December 1999

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Vickie L. Nadolski, Director

NOAA/NWS Western Region Headquarters

125 S. State Street, Room1311

Salt Lake City, UT 84138

Telephone: (801) 524-5122

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

The Portland Weather Forecast Office and Northwest River Forecast Center
provided outstanding service to protect life and property during a
flooding event between December 2005 and February 2006.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For outstanding customer service by WFO Portland and the NWRFC during
the flood events between December 18, 2005 and February 4, 2006.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

In order of appearance in Section 2 -- Award Justification below:

Flood Stage -- an established gage height at a given location above
which a rise in water surface level is defined as a flood for the
corresponding river or stream reach. Flood stage is usually set at a
level where the river or stream begins to overflow its banks and create
a potential hazard to lives, property, or commerce. Flood stage may
equal or exceed bankfull stage but should rarely be less than bankfull
stage.

DOC -- Department of Commerce

NOAA- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

WFO -- NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

NWRFC -- NOAA/NWS Northwest River Forecast Center

RFC -- River Forecast Center

OES -- Oregon Emergency Services (also known as Emergency Management)

IFPS -- NOAA/NWS Interactive Forecast Preparation System

GFE -- Graphical Forecast Editor

QPF -- Quantitative Precipitation Forecast

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

The goal was to provide critical life-saving flood forecasts from
December 18, 2005 to February 4, 2006 for Northwest Oregon and Southwest
Washington, when a series of storms resulted in 200-300% of normal
rainfall (DOC Strategic Objective 3.1). During this time, there was one
death attributed to high water and flood damage estimated at \$10
million. Nineteen Oregon counties plus the Confederated Tribes of the
Warm Springs Reservation received Federal Disaster Declarations.

-   **What was the context in which the nominees addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

Emergency responders and dam operators require timely and accurate river
forecasts during floods to minimize property damage and prevent loss of
life. Through the issuance of timely forecasts and frequent contact with
emergency responders and dam operators, WFO Portland and the NWRFC
helped mitigate loss of life and property damage during this unusually
long flood event.

-   **What specific actions did the nominees take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

The NWRFC and WFO Portland provided excellent service for the flood
event from December 18, 2005 to February 4, 2006. The RFC was staffed 24
hours on several days, instead of its normal staffing of 16 hours, and
the WFO added extra staff. NWRFC Hydrometeorological Analysis and
Support (HAS) staff and WFO forecasters updated precipitation and
temperature forecasts throughout the event. NWRFC hydrologists updated
river forecasts 3-4 times daily, especially following precipitation and
temperature updates or reservoir regulation releases. NWRFC and WFO
Portland staff members demonstrated excellent communication.

WFO Portland verified 67 flood warnings during the event, with an
average lead time of 9 hours. This shatters the NWS Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA) goal of 48 minutes. The Probability
of Detection was 99%, exceeding the GPRA goal of 88%. Average lead time
for flood watches prior to the earliest onset of flooding was 20 hours.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

Excellent lead time allowed emergency responders to activate the
Emergency Operations Center's resources, evacuate citizens, and block
access to flood prone areas prior to inundation.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The WFO and RFC provided accurate and timely forecasts and warnings over
a 6-week period ending on February 4, 2006. The WFO also issued several
High Wind and Winter Weather warnings during the same period.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The WFO and RFC archived a number of the events and will use this data
to train staff on improving future flood forecasts.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

The NWRFC used WFO Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF) grids
generated by the Interactive Forecast Preparation System (IFPS) for the
first time to assess and generate QPF used in river models. This
experience will improve forecasters' ability to diagnose and predict
similar events in the future and allow WFOs and RFCs to interact more
efficiently.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The NWS worked closely with Federal, State and Local Emergency
Management agencies and media to mitigate the impacts of flooding on
residents. They also coordinated closely with Bonneville Power
Administration, the Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation,
PacifiCorp, and Tacoma City Light to manage reservoir operations. The
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) used data from this event to
determine Federal Disaster declarations.

After the event, the Corps of Engineers commented**,** "The
professionalism and helpful attitudes of the RFC staff during this event
made our work much easier."

A Washington County Emergency Manager said, "Nice job with the great
forecast information flowing from your office... Please pass my thanks
and that of the Washington County emergency management and public safety
staffs to all your personnel!"

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

The WFO was able test and evaluate new flood forecast preparation
software and dissemination tools, which allowed them to identify
weakness in the systems that will help other offices across the country.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

Direct contact with emergency personnel was crucial to save lives in
flood prone areas. As a result of excellent lead time, evacuations took
place and affected areas were blocked off well ahead of flooding
problems. In the future, emergency responders will have increased
confidence in NWS forecasts and warnings because of the exemplary
service provided.

**WFO San Francisco Bay Area, et al**

**NWS**

**Nomination #77**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Public Service

**4. Name of Nominees:** NOAA's National Weather Service

> WFO San Francisco Bay Area

**Accepting the Award:** David Reynolds, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** Ren ulds

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA's National Weather Service

> WFO Sacramento
>
> 3310 El Camino Avenue
>
> Sacramento, CA 95821-6308

**Accepting the Award:** Elizabeth Morse, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA's National Weather Service

> WFO Reno
>
> 2350 Raggio Parkway
>
> Reno, NV 89512-3900

**Accepting the Award:** Jane Hollingsworth, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** Hall ings worth

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA's National Weather Service

> WFO Eureka
>
> 300 Startare Drive\
> Eureka, CA 95501-2350

**Accepting the Award:** Nancy Dean, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** as written

**Name of Nominee:** NOAA's National Weather Service

> California-Nevada River Forecast Center
>
> 3310 El Camino Avenue
>
> Sacramento, CA 95821-6308

**Accepting the Award:** Robert Hartman, Hydrologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** Heart man

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** WFO San Francisco Bay
Area:

Bronze Medal December 1998

Unit Citation 1983, 1984, 1995

> Modernization Award 1994

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

Vickie L. Nadolski

Western Region Director

NOAA/National Weather Service

125 S. State Street, Room 1311

Salt Lake City, UT 84138

Telephone: (801) 524-5122

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

Life- and property-saving service was provided during the 2005-2006 "New
Years" floods which caused \$540 million in damages, but resulted in
only 3 lives lost in an affected population of 4 million.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For life- and property-saving service in California and Nevada during
the severe "New Years" flooding of 2005-2006.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

DoC -- Department of Commerce

FEMA -- Federal Emergency Management Agency

HMT- Hydrometeorological Test Bed

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

RFC -- NOAA/NWS River Forecast Center

WFO -- NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

OAR -- NOAA Office of Atmospheric Research

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific challenge related to the Department=s mission/or
Strategic Plan?**

DoC Strategic Goal 3: *Observe, protect, and manage the Earth's
resources to promote environmental stewardship;* Objective 3.1: Advance
understanding and predict changes in the Earth's environment to meet
America's economic, social and environmental needs; Outcome: Improve
accuracy and timeliness of weather and water information.

**What was the context in which the nominees addressed the challenge?**

Storms between Christmas and New Years 2005/06 showed potential for
widespread, serious flooding. Delay in raising the alarm would catch
action agencies short-staffed and unable to handle devastating floods
over the holidays. As flooding developed, nearly non-stop briefings,
press conferences, and written products pinpointed areas of greatest
risk.

**What specific actions did the nominees take to address the
challenge?**

The National Weather Service (NWS) Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) and
the California-Nevada River Forecast Center (CNRFC) issued coordinated
products on December 23, 2005, highlighting upcoming flood potential. On
December 26, daily conference calls (up to five per day) began between
the WFOs, CNRFC, emergency managers, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, and the multi-agency State-Federal Flood Center. Twice-daily
joint-agency press briefings and dozens of media interviews raised
awareness. By December 28, offices were staffing extra shifts to
coordinate services, handle extensive outreach, and issue multiple
warning products. The increased shifts placed a burden on the office as
staffing had been reduced due to the holiday period.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Even though the major event occurred over a peak holiday period in a
highly populated area, only three lives were lost. The long lead-time
and timely updates provided by the NWS kept the public informed of
potential hazards, and decision-makers had time to prepare for flooding.
When flooding was imminent, NWS warnings and briefings allowed informed
decisions to be made about resource deployment and flood-fight efforts.
Reaction to advance NWS warning about wind wave flooding helped ensure
the safety of the drinking water supply for about one-third of
California.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed?**

Ten days from December 23, 2005 until January 1, 2006.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

Benefits were reaped during subsequent flooding in 2006, when NWS
advance word led to a statewide mobilization of resources based on trust
in the NWS. In addition, comprehensive post-flood reviews identifying
what worked well and what needed improvement will improve the warning
process.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

This event provided invaluable information to the NWS
Hydrometeorological Test Bed (HMT) for improving future operations. The
HMT accelerates infusion of new technologies, models, and scientific
results into daily NWS forecasting operations.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

Yes. The NWS offices closely coordinated with NOAA's Office of
Atmospheric Research who conducted the HMT. The data will help the Army
Corp of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation better design and
operate flood control systems. The Department of Homeland Security can
use the statistics for response, recovery, and mitigation efforts.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. The information obtained will be very useful for the HMT in future
modeling efforts and improved observations of future events.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas? If so, how?**

This event helped build a trusting relationship between NWS and decision
makers and a better response to NWS warnings. Aaron Kenneston, Washoe
County Nevada Emergency Manager, said, "The briefings and advance
warning provided by the NWS allowed us to alert businesses, local
governments, and the public of potential flooding hazards. We were able
to put resources in place quickly to mitigate affects of the flooding.\"

Since the event, the Sonoma County Department of Emergency Services and
the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors presented a certificate to WFO
San Francisco Bay Area and the CNRFC, thanking the NWS for "Outstanding
and Dedicated Service in Response to the New Year's Floods of 2006".
Sonoma County and Marin County are now working on the certification
process to become StormReady, an NWS program which helps communities
better prepare for and mitigate the effects of extreme weather-related
events.

**WFO Shreveport, Louisiana**

**NWS**

**Nomination #78**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organization

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** WFO Shreveport

**Accepting the Award:** Armando Garza, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** are-MAHN-doe GARR-zah

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

> WFO Shreveport
>
> 5655 Hollywood Ave
>
> Shreveport, LA 75672

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:**

Bronze Medal October 2000

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator's Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

X. William Proenza, Director

NOAA/NWS Southern Region

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Telephone: (817) 978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

WFO Shreveport provided critical forecasts and warnings for Hurricane
Rita as it produced strong damaging winds and heavy rainfall with
localized flooding over a 48 county and parish area.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For life saving services provided to the four state area of Oklahoma,
Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas during Hurricane Rita: September 24-25,
2005.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

ARKLATEX -- acronym applied to the area where the borders of Arkansas,
Louisiana, and Texas intersect.

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- NOAA's National Weather Service

WFO -- NOAA/NWS Weather Forecast Office

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission/or Strategic Plan?**

Providing weather support is related to Department of Commerce Strategic
Goal 3, Objective 3.1, "...to predict changes in the environment...to
meet economic, social, and environmental needs."

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge, or problem?**

All actions taken by NOAA's NWS WFO Shreveport, LA addressed the needs
of the media and emergency management community, as well as other first
responders who required accurate information that was being used for
planning. The real challenge was in the issuance of timely products
within a very unstable atmosphere where high winds and heavy rainfall
threatened the safety of residents in the four state area.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?**

As verified by three letters which were written to the NWS Southern
Region Director from the emergency management community and from the
Office of Homeland Security, the WFO performed in a very decisive
manner. Products issued by the office were credited with being crucial
in the decision making process for sandbagging for flood protection and
for proper coordination of arrival of evacuees by buses, helicopters and
aircraft from southwest Louisiana and southeast Texas. Products were
also used as the Emergency Operations Center's primary information for
responses to thousands of calls into the command centers as well as the
"211" line for local assistance.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?**

Actions taken by WFO Shreveport staff resulted in minimal loss of life
due to preparedness efforts taken as a result of forecasts and warnings
issued with plenty of lead time. Approximately 100 homes and businesses
suffered mostly minor structural damage from either high winds or fallen
trees, and over 175,000 people lost power, but only two fatalities
occurred -- one person had a tree fall on him and the other one was
electrocuted when picking up a hot power line.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

The staff maintained continuous watch and worked Hurricane Rita for
several days. In preparation for Hurricane Rita, staffing was evaluated
and extra staff began arriving at 4 AM CT Saturday September 24^th^,
with additional staff members arriving in staggered shifts throughout
the day on Saturday and continuing through early Sunday. The electronics
staff greatly assisted operations by performing several tasks to
maintain generator power and were available throughout the event. The
event ended by late afternoon on September 25.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

The NWS office in Shreveport again demonstrated that it is an office
that has staffing who place service before self. All employees worked
the event and provided valuable information which helped the general
public better prepare for the strong winds and heavy rains associated
with Hurricane Rita. Customers will likely continue to take future
messages issued by the office seriously and take the appropriate
measures to safeguard life and property.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?**

Credibility of accurate forecasts and warnings has been elevated.
Customers will expect the same level of high quality service in the
future.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?**

The event exemplified the partnership efforts with the Office of
Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness. Through establishment of
close relationships, the office was able to work hand in hand with its
partners to proactively advise the public of threatening weather
conditions.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?**

Yes. Lessons learned from this event will assist in the next hurricane
season.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support? If so, how?**

It definitely helped customer service as verified by several letters
written to the Southern Region Headquarters Director with positive
feedback from the emergency management community. During the event,
numerous conference calls and media interviews were conducted; a live
press conference was held the day before Hurricane Rita made landfall
which was carried live on three of the local television networks; and
several Spanish radio interviews were conducted - a first for the
ARKLATEX area.

**WFO Tulsa, Oklahoma**

**NWS**

**Nomination #79**

**1. Type of Award:** Bronze

**2. Nomination Type:** Organizational

**3. Nomination Category:** Customer Service

**4. Name of Nominee:** NOAA/National Weather Service WFO Tulsa, OK

**Accepting:** Steve Piltz, Meteorologist-in-Charge

**Pronunciation:** PILT's

**Complete office address:** National Weather Service Office, NOAA

WFO Tulsa, Oklahoma

> 10159 East 11^th^ Street, Suite 300
>
> Tulsa, OK 74128

**5. Other National Weather Service Awards:** Silver Medal November,
2003

Silver Medal December, 1999

**6. Current Performance Rating:** N/A

**7. Nominator=s Name, Title, complete office address, and phone
number:**

X. William Proenza, Director

NOAA/NWS Southern Region Headquarters

819 Taylor Street, Room 10A03

Fort Worth, TX 76102

Telephone: (817) 978-1000

**[What is the significance of this accomplishment?]{.underline}**

From November 27^th^ to 30^th^, 2005, WFO Tulsa provided special
services to assist the firefighting efforts and to help protect
firefighter lives during a severe fire weather event.

**[I. Certificate Text:]{.underline}**

For providing critical forecasts and specialized support during a severe
fire weather episode in eastern Oklahoma on November 27^th^ to 30^th^,
2005.

**[III. Justification:]{.underline}**

**[Section 1 - Definitions:]{.underline}**

NOAA -- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NWS -- National Weather Service

WFO -- NOAA/National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office

WCM -- NWS Warning Coordination Meteorologist

ITO -- NWS Information Technology Officer

**[Section 2 - Award Justification:]{.underline}**

-   **What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
    Department=s mission/or Strategic Plan?**

> The contributions of NOAA/NWS WFO Tulsa, OK relate to performance
> outcomes cited in the Department of Commerce (DOC) 2004-2009 Strategic
> Plan: "Issue forecasts and warnings that help protect life and
> property and enhance the U.S. economy". The challenge was to keep key
> decision makers aware of the dangerous potential during a critical
> fire weather situation.

-   **What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
    challenge, or problem?**

> Unprecedented fire weather conditions developed in eastern Oklahoma on
> November 27^th^, 2005, with winds gusting to 70 miles per hour (MPH)
> and relative humidity values in the single digits. Local officials
> would not typically expect such a volatile fire weather scenario,
> which could have easily resulted in the loss of situational awareness
> by those making life and property saving decisions.

-   **What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
    challenge or problem?**

> WFO Tulsa developed a complex set of computer programs and web pages
> to provide decision support information for emergency officials.
> Hourly text products were issued with a four hour forecast of
> conditions for each county in the WFO Tulsa service area. As a result
> of this work, emergency officials had access to both forecast and
> observed graphics depicting the peak winds, relative humidity, and
> fire spread potential during this event. Additionally, WFO Tulsa
> dispatched its Warning Coordination Meteorologist (WCM) to the
> Oklahoma Unified Fire Command Post on November 28^th^. Through the
> face-to-face interactions, requests for additional services were
> communicated quickly to the WFO's Information Technology Officer
> (ITO), who was able to respond with new graphics on the web within one
> hour. These requests included 3 hourly wind and humidity graphics to
> augment the text products. Fire officials could see graphics in the 0
> to 3 hour time frame that allowed them to assess wind shifts and note
> humidity changes, both critical in wildfire situations.

-   **What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
    qualitative terms?**

> Federal, state and local officials complimented WFO Tulsa for having
> these services in place before the event, and for being able to
> augment the services so rapidly. Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry
> expressed his regards directly to the WFO Tulsa WCM.

**[Section 3 - Additional Information:]{.underline}**

-   **How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
    accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?**

> The overall concept of a decision support web page driven by the local
> forecast database evolved for several years. The response to specific
> requests during these critical times took less than one hour.

-   **What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

> The short-term impact is that the WFO Tulsa demonstrated that it can
> deliver impact services by using the forecast database common to all
> WFOs. Therefore, all WFOs could implement such services very quickly.

-   **What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
    the bureau and/or Department=s mission?**

> The NWS can develop a full suite of risk assessment techniques using
> the forecast database to enhance the situational awareness of a wide
> variety of emergency responders on various geographic and temporal
> scales.

-   **Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
    Federal agencies? If so, how?**

> The technique of developing risk assessment graphics and text from the
> NWS database could be used to support the Federal Emergency Management
> Agency and it's parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
    technology, or automation? If so, how?**

> WFO Tulsa's use of base forecast data that are already being produced
> to provide a detailed risk assessments demonstrates an
> ingredients-based approach to hazardous weather forecasting that
> forces a forecaster to consider the implications of their most basic
> decisions. Thus, placing a higher emphasis on the basic forecast and
> necessitating the consideration of how a base element affects the
> potential for hazardous weather. An example would be resolving the
> conflict of forecasting a tornado outbreak, when base data does not
> suggest there will be high levels of atmospheric instability.

-   **Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
    non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative
    support? If so, how?**

> WFO Tulsa's support of emergency responders during the November, 2005
> fire event demonstrated a unique and partnership-based technique.
> Using a formula provided by local officials, a NWS office utilized its
> own forecast database to derive a risk assessment for fire spread.
> This approach can be applied to a number of hazards and strengthen
> relationships among all levels of government, while at the same time
> providing the public with better information.

[]{#Marcy .anchor}Doug Marcy

NOS

Nomination #80

**(Originally submitted as Hurricane Katrina nomination)**

**Full name of nominee(s):** Doug Marcy

**Major Line or Staff Office for each nominee:** NOS

**Position title and grade**: Physical Scientist, Grade 13

**Past awards**: none

**Nominator's name and major Line or Staff Office**: Cindy Fowler, NOS

**What is the significance of this accomplishment?** NOAA has critical
data that are needed in support of decisions in hazards mitigation,
pre-storm, and post-storm recovery planning. Many of these data have
additional value when converted to GIS formats and viewed in context
with external data. Doug developed a process for NOAA data to be used by
DHS in pre-positioning federal resources and search and rescue efforts.

**I. Certificate citation:** For outstanding leadership in geospatial
mapping support to the nation before, during, and after the 2005
Atlantic hurricane season.

**II. Program Booklet** (*not* *required for Admin or Bronze Award*)

**III. Justification:**

**SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS**

-   DHS: Department of Homeland Security

-   FEMA: Federal Emergency Management Agency

-   GIS: Geographic information system

-   GOES: Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite

-   H\*Wind: Hurricane wind analysis system, an integrated tropical
    cyclone observing system in which wind measurements from a variety
    of observation platforms could be used to develop an objective
    analysis of the distribution of wind speeds in a hurricane

-   HPC: Hydrometeorological Prediction Center

-   HSOC: Homeland Security Operations Center

-   ICC: Incident Command Center

-   NDFD: National Digital Forecast Database consists of gridded
    forecasts of sensible weather elements (e.g., windspeed, waveheight,
    etc.)

-   NEXRAD: Next Generation Weather Radar, A National Weather Service
    network of about 140 Doppler radars operating nationwide.

-   NWS: National Weather Service

-   QPF: Quantitative Precipitation Forecast, a spatial and temporal
    precipitation forecast of precipitation for a specified region or
    area.

-   SLOSH: Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes, is a
    computerized model run by the National Hurricane Center (NHC) to
    estimate storm surge heights and winds resulting from historical,
    hypothetical, or predicted hurricanes.

-   Stage III rainfall: Gridded rainfall data calibrated with
    precipitation gages and combined using average of stage II
    estimates. This is the product used for hydrologic modeling and
    flash flood forecasting.

-   TPC NHC: NOAA NWS Tropical Prediction Center National Hurricane
    Center

**SECTION 2 - AWARD JUSTIFICATION**

**What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department's mission and/or strategic plan?** This effort addresses the
DOC Strategic Goal to *observe, protect, and manage the Earth's
resources to promote environmental stewardship* and the DOC Management
Integration *Goal to achieve organizational and management excellence*.
It particularly speaks to NOAA's goal to improve decision making when it
comes to natural hazards and have NOAA serve society's need for weather
and water information. Putting the information into a format that was
more user-friendly increased the use and impact of important information
and greatly benefited the end-user in a way that would not have been
possible otherwise. It allowed for improved emergency preparedness
(pre-positioning) within DOC, DHS, and other government partners. In
addition, the data were provided in a form useful for real-time search
and rescue support.

**What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?** Doug was in a unique position to bring together
his technical skills, understanding of NOAA, specifically NWS, and DHS
FEMA agency procedures, and subject matter expertise in hazards to
improve access to critical natural hazards support data.

**What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?** Doug developed procedures for DHS to use and
apply NOAA data, including the 6-hr flash flood guidance, 24-hr Stage
III rainfall, 120-hr QPF/6 hr- flash flood guidance difference,
cumulative rainfall using stage III, H\*wind datasets, HPC QPF,
Significant River Flood Outlook, SLOSH model output, NDFD wave height,
NDFD wind speed, and TPC NHC forecast track and 3-day error cone with
GOES and NEXRAD. He organized and led a technical team to use these
procedures and develop data and map products to support decision making
in advance of Atlantic land-falling hurricanes during the past three
hurricane seasons. Doug perfected the process and led a team to develop
a concise tutorial (How-To Guide) for DHS staff to access and apply NOAA
data. This tutorial is being used by DHS in preparation for the 2006
Atlantic hurricane season and will help leverage NOAA data by increasing
its use throughout DHS during future hazard events.

**What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?** Doug was instrumental in providing NOAA data and
map products for the past three years, but specifically during the 2005
Atlantic hurricane season he led a team of seven technical staff to
produce more than 100 map products and critical datasets used by DHS
FEMA and HSOC before or during landfalling hurricanes. DHS used the data
for advance spatial analysis in both search and rescue and
pre-positioning of federal resources. Furthermore, Doug's proactive
approach with the NOAA Data Tutorial has already contributed to training
and planning for the 2006 Atlantic hurricane Season. The tutorial is in
the process of being used in outreach efforts by DHS and FEMA hurricane
planning. The tutorial will be used in key DHS trainings on natural
hazards planning, including the NOAA / DHS emergency managers training
at the National Hurricane Center.

**SECTION 3 - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION**

**How long did it take to complete the accomplishment?** The
accomplishment resulted from efforts during the last three years
(starting during Hurricane Isabel, 2003) but proved extremely valuable
during the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season during major hurricanes,
Katrina, Rita, and Wilma.

**What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on the
bureau and/or Department's mission?** Significant results have been
realized by the use of NOAA data by DHS in support of the nation for
three hurricane seasons. Products have been developed and continue to be
improved that enhance storm preparedness. DHS has used the products to
assist with pre-positioning resources for post-event search and rescue
operations.

**What is the long-term impact (3-5 years**) **of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department's mission?** Long-term impacts will be a
continued reduction in the uncertainty of decision making in hazardous
weather conditions. The data will result in additional information to
support search and rescue and help with the positioning of federal
resources. The seamless integration of NOAA data in times of natural
disasters is the ultimate long-term goal. The positive economic impact
to the nation by improved decision making along with enhanced protection
of lives and property are outcomes of this effort.

**Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies?** DHS FEMA regions and HSOC are the target beneficiary
of this data, but a secondary audience of state and local emergency
managers is also being targeted. Internal NOAA offices already receive
these products via the NOAA ICC.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation?** (Technological Advancement) Many of the
NOAA NWS data were in formats that were not useable by GIS or mapping
systems outside of internal NWS systems. Doug helped develop software
and procedures to convert NWS data formats into GIS. He developed a
process to display forecast data on easy to read and understand map
products and provided datasets for further integration and spatial
analysis.

**Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in non-scientific
areas such as customer service or administrative support?** This project
provided customer service in the form of map products and data which
were used for daily briefing packages to DHS FEMA regional offices,
joint field offices, the DHS HSOC, and the NOAA ICC. These products
enabled the recipients to improve decision making before, during, and
after an event.

[]{#Hytrek .anchor}**Number range CHAPTERDan Hytrek Group**

**OGC**

**Nomination #81**

**Group Nomination:**

\(1\) Dan A. Hytrek, Attorney-Advisor, GS-14, Office of the Under
Secretary/OGC/GCSW

\(2\) Rodney R. McInnis, Regional Administrator, ES, NMFS/SWR

\(3\) Steven A. Edmondson, Supervisor Fisheries Specialist, ZP-4,
NMFS/SWR

\(4\) Howard L. Brown, Fishery Biologist, ZP-3, NMFS/SWR

\(5\) Eric Theiss, Fishery Biologist, ZP-2, NMFS/SWR

**Nominator:** Judson Feder, Regional Counsel, Office of the Under
Secretary, OGC/GCSW

**What is the Significance of the Accomplishment?**

The nominees substantially improved conditions for salmonids through a
complex agreement requiring fisheries and wildlife protection,
mitigation, and enhancement for the Oroville Facilities Hydroelectric
Project (Oroville Project) in California, a central component of one of
the largest public water distribution projects in the world.

**[Certificate Text]{.underline}**

For negotiating an agreement to significantly improve conditions for
salmonids affected by the Oroville Facilities Hydroelectric Project.

**[Justification]{.underline}**

1\. *What was the specific goal, challenge or problem related to the
Department=s mission and/or strategic plan?*

For the first time in California, NOAA forged a consensus among multiple
state agencies, approximately 25 water users, environmental interests,
an Indian tribe, and various local and municipal organizations with
widely disparate interests to substantially change the operations of a
large hydroelectric project in order to improve conditions for Central
Valley spring-run chinook salmon and California Central Valley steelhead
in the Feather River, both salmonid species listed as Athreatened@ under
the Endangered Species Act. The Feather River is a major tributary to
the Sacramento River, which is the primary source of fresh water in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta. The Oroville dam (the primary facility
of the Oroville Project) is the tallest dam in the U.S., and is one of
the centerpieces of the California State Water Project, which is a key
supplier of water to farms in the Central Valley, as well as
municipal/other users in both northern and southern California.

2\. *What was the context in which the nominee addressed the goal,
challenge or problem?*

The context was the relicensing of the Oroville Project by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The relicensing process gave NOAA
an opportunity to develop mandatory fishways prescriptions to provide
passage for anadromous fish such as salmon and steelhead, as well as
recommend license conditions for the protection, mitigation, and
enhancement of such species. These prescriptions and recommended
conditions result in conditions effective for the 30-50 year term of a
license. In lieu of simply issuing a mandatory fishways prescription,
NOAA chose to negotiate a settlement for substantial habitat enhancement
for the threatened salmonids at issue, which reserving authority to
issue a prescription. 

3\. *What specific actions did the nominee take to address the goal,
challenge or problem?*

In coordination with other Federal players, these five nominees took the
legal, management, and program leads in representing NOAA at the
negotiations, cajoled the other parties into agreement, drafted
significant portions of the settlement documents, and coordinated
settlement terms to be consistent with the eventual biological opinion
on the operations of the Project. They exercised patience, perseverance,
tact, and legal acumen in articulating NOAA=s positions to the diverse
parties, with respect to the biological needs of salmon species in the
Feather River as they are affected by the Oroville Project.

4\. *What were the results of the actions in either quantifiable or
qualitative terms?*

A complex, multi-party settlement agreement was negotiated that will
change operations of a huge hydro-electric project; the changes affect
millions of people in large parts the state. Although the salmonids
conserved cannot yet be Acounted@, the agreement is expected to result
in a significant improvement in conditions for salmonids, in accordance
with the Administration program to administer the Endangered Species
Act.

5\. *How long did it take to complete the accomplishment? When was the
accomplishment completed/implemented/deployed?*

The majority of the settlement negotiations took place between October
2004 and March 2006, with a settlement agreement finalized in March
2006, and with follow up continuing into July 2006.

6\. *What is the short-term impact (1-2 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department=s mission?*

The settlement agreement will change the operations of the Oroville
Project such that positive impacts in improving conditions for salmonids
will begin within 2 years.

7\. *What is the long-term impact (3-5 years) of the accomplishment on
the bureau and/or Department=s mission?*

The settlement agreement will continue to have positive impacts on the
conditions for salmonids in the Feather River for *much* longer than 5
years, as described above.

8\. *Does the accomplishment affect other bureaus/Department or other
Federal agencies? If so, how?*

The accomplishment guides FERC in determining what license conditions to
impose upon the operator of the Oroville Project for the benefit of
salmonids.

9\. *Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in science,
technology, or automation? If so, how?*

This settlement agreement resulted in a major advancement in science, by
improving conditions for salmonids in the Feather River and preserving
the biodiversity of Sacramento River anadromous fish.

10\. *Did the accomplishment result in a major advancement in
non-scientific areas such as customer service or administrative support?
If so, how?*

The settlement agreement negotiations built positive relationships with
the project operator and other stakeholders, including NOAA, other
Federal and state fisheries and wildlife agencies, State water
contractors, and non-governmental organizations, that will help in the
implementation of the expected 50-year term of this license as well as
similar actions for other projects in California.