**[State Name]{.smallcaps}**

**[MCSAP Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan]{.smallcaps}**

**[FY 2009]{.smallcaps}**

Contents

Mission & Goal Statement [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981607)

Executive Summary [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981608)

State CMV Safety Program Objectives [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981609)

CMV Crash Reduction (Recommended) [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981610)

CMV Safety Improvement (Recommended) [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981611)

CMV HM Transportation Safety (Optional)
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981612)

Passenger Transportation Safety (Recommended)
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981613)

CMV Safety Data Quality (Recommended if the State's Overall SSDQ Rating
is Poor/Red or Fair/Yellow\*) [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981614)

National CMV Safety Program Element Objectives
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981615)

Driver/Vehicle Inspections [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981616)

Traffic Enforcement [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981617)

Compliance Reviews [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981618)

Public Education & Awareness [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981619)

Data Collection [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981620)

Financial Management [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981621)

• Financial Summary [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981622)

• Budget Summary [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981623)

• Line-Item Budget [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981624)

• Equipment Description [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981625)

• MOE Calculation Verification Report [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981626)

Grant & Certifications Documents [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981627)

Program Contacts [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981628)

Data Analysis & Trends [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981629)

Attachments [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981630)

State Training Plan [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981631)

List of Tables

Table 1. National Program Elements/FY 2009 National Emphasis Areas And
State CMV Safety Program Objectives Placement Summary
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981205)

Table 2. Driver/Vehicle Inspection Performance Output Targets FY 2009
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981206)

Table 3. Violation Section 49 CFR 392--Trend Analysis (Not Quota)
(2005-2007) [2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981207)

Table 4. Violation Section 49 CFR 392--Violation Codes
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981208)

Table 5. Compliance Review Activity Projections FY 2009
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981209)

Table 6. FY 2009 National Program Element Budget Summary
[2](#__RefHeading___Toc198981210)

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981607 .anchor}**[Mission & Goal Statement
(Less than 1 page)]{.smallcaps}**

> This section shall describe the State's mission and goal of the State
> agency and program participants. This must include a CMV Fatality
> Reduction Goal, including annual performance targets. The goal must be
> **[compatible]{.underline}** with our National CMV Fatality Reduction
> Goal of reducing the rate of truck-related fatalities to no more than
> 0.16 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 2011 from a
> baseline rate of 0.184 per 100 million VMT in 2005. Having a goal
> consistent with the national goal does not mean identical; however, it
> must achieve the same intended purpose of reducing CMV crashes and
> fatalities in a measurable and repeatable manner*.*

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981608 .anchor}**[Executive Summary (1-2
Pages)]{.smallcaps}**

**Background:** States shall summarize the program effectiveness of the
prior years' activities in reducing CMV crashes, injuries, and
fatalities, and improving driver and motor carrier safety performance.
The summary must show trends that are supported by safety and program
performance data collected over several years (3-5 years). The summary
must include an analysis of safety or performance challenges/problems in
the State and those challenges/problems must be addressed in the current
year's CVSP.

**FY 2009** **Plan Highlights**: States shall provide a high level
summary of the State CMV Safety Program Objectives and National CMV
Safety Program Element Objectives, including key activities and
performance goals. States shall also describe how it supports the
activities identified in §350.201(q) 1 through 3 and §350.201(t) 1
through 2, respectively. Activities identified in §350.201(q) 1 through
3 include:

> (q)(1) Activities aimed at removing impaired CMV drivers from the
> highways through adequate enforcement of restrictions on the use of
> alcohol and controlled substances and by ensuring ready roadside
> access to alcohol detection and measuring equipment.
>
> (q)(2) Activities aimed at providing an appropriate level of training
> to MCSAP personnel to recognize drivers impaired by alcohol or
> controlled substances.
>
> (q)(3) Interdiction activities affecting the transportation of
> controlled substances by CMV drivers and training on appropriate
> strategies for carrying out those interdiction activities.

Activities identified in §350.201(t) 1 through 2 include:

> (t)(1) Enforce registration (i.e., operating authority) requirements
> under 49 U.S.C. 13902, 49 CFR Part 365, 49 CFR Part 368, and 49 CFR
> 392.9a by prohibiting the operation of (i.e., placing out of service)
> any vehicle discovered to be operating without the required operating
> authority or beyond the scope of the motor carrier's operating
> authority.
>
> (t)(2) Enforce financial responsibility requirements under 49 U.S.C.
> 13906, 31138, 31139, and 49 CFR Part 387.

**[Program Description (2-3 Pages)]{.smallcaps}**

> **Program Structure**:  States shall provide details of their program,
> including the program structure (State and local agency participation,
> along with responsibilities), number of personnel supporting the
> program within each State and local agency, and/or personnel
> trained/certified.
>
> **National Program Elements and FY 2009 National Emphasis Areas: **
> States should use Table 1 on the following page to identify if the
> National Program Elements (as defined in Part 350.109) and the FY 2009
> National Emphasis Areas (as identified in the FY 2009 Planning
> Memorandum) are addressed in the State CMV Safety Program Objectives
> and if so, where. For the purpose of the table, the National Program
> Elements and FY 2009 National Emphasis Areas are combined into one
> list and appear as rows.  The State CMV Safety Program Objective areas
> are listed across the top as column headings.   Sample entries are
> provided in the table for guidance and reference *only* and should be
> deleted and replaced with State specific details.   
>
> **[Instructions for completing Table 1:]{.underline}**
>
> States should record the corresponding page number(s) and the section
> title/heading *(e.g., Pg. #, Title/Heading)* of their completed CVSP
> document in the appropriate intersecting cell(s) describing where a
> National Program Element and/or FY 2009 National Emphasis Area is
> addressed in a State CMV Safety Program Objective area. 
>
> *Note: Given the understanding and anticipation that any one program
> element and/or emphasis area may be addressed in multiple State CMV
> Program Objectives, States are encouraged to record [all]{.underline}
> references in the appropriate corresponding cells. More than one cell
> in a row may be filled in.*

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981205 .anchor}Table 1. National Program
Elements/FY 2009 National Emphasis Areas And State CMV Safety Program
Objectives Placement Summary

+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **National   | #        |          |          |          |          |
| Program      | #######  |          |          |          |          |
| Elements**   | STATE CM |          |          |          |          |
|              | V SAFETY |          |          |          |          |
| **&**        |  PROGRAM |          |          |          |          |
|              |  OBJECTI |          |          |          |          |
| **FY 2009    | VES  {#s |          |          |          |          |
| National     | tate-cmv |          |          |          |          |
| Emphasis     | -safety- |          |          |          |          |
| Areas**      | program- |          |          |          |          |
|              | objectiv |          |          |          |          |
|              | es .Tabl |          |          |          |          |
|              | e-Title} |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|              | ##       | ######## | ######   | ##       | ##       |
|              | ###### C |  Safety  | ## HM Tr | ###### P | ###### S |
|              | rash Red | Improvem | ansporta | assenger | afety Da |
|              | uction ( | ent (Rec | tion Saf |  Transpo | ta Quali |
|              | Recommen | ommended | ety (Opt | rtation  | ty (Reco |
|              | ded) {#c | ) {#safe | ional) { | Safety ( | mmended) |
|              | rash-red | ty-impro | #hm-tran | Recommen |  {#safet |
|              | uction-r | vement-r | sportati | ded) {#p | y-data-q |
|              | ecommend | ecommend | on-safet | assenger | uality-r |
|              | ed .Tabl | ed .Tabl | y-option | -transpo | ecommend |
|              | e-Title} | e-Title} | al .Tabl | rtation- | ed .Tabl |
|              |          |          | e-Title} | safety-r | e-Title} |
|              |          |          |          | ecommend |          |
|              |          |          |          | ed .Tabl |          |
|              |          |          |          | e-Title} |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Dr         |          |          |          |          |          |
| iver/Vehicle |          |          |          |          |          |
| I            |          |          |          |          |          |
| nspections** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -   *Drive   | *Ex. Pg. |          |          |          |          |
| r-focused\** | 7,       |          |          |          |          |
|              | Activity |          |          |          |          |
|              | (1)*     |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -            |          |          |          | *Ex. Pg. |          |
|   *Passenger |          |          |          | 11,      |          |
|              |          |          |          | St       |          |
|   carrier\** |          |          |          | rategy1* |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Traffic    |          |          |          |          |          |
| E            |          |          |          |          |          |
| nforcement** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -   *W/      |          |          |          |          |          |
|     in       |          |          |          |          |          |
| spections\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -   *W/o     |          |          |          |          |          |
|     in       |          |          |          |          |          |
| spections\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Compliance |          |          |          |          |          |
| Reviews**    |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -   *I       |          |          |          |          |          |
| nterstate\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -   *I       |          |          |          |          |          |
| ntrastate\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Public     | *Ex. Pg. | *Ex. Pg. |          |          |          |
| Education    | 7,       | 9,       |          |          |          |
| and          | Activity | Activity |          |          |          |
| Awareness**  | 3*       | (2)*     |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Data       |          |          |          |          |          |
| Collection** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -            |          |          |          |          | *Ex. Pg. |
| *Accuracy\** |          |          |          |          | 12,      |
|              |          |          |          |          | Activity |
|              |          |          |          |          | 1*       |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| -   *T       |          |          |          |          |          |
| imeliness\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Rural Road | *Ex. Pg. |          |          |          |          |
| CMV          | 7,       |          |          |          |          |
| Initi        | Strategy |          |          |          |          |
| atives***\** | 1*       |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Hazardous  |          |          |          |          |          |
| Materials    |          |          |          |          |          |
| P            |          |          |          |          |          |
| rogram***\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| **Seat Belt  |          |          |          |          |          |
| Enfor        |          |          |          |          |          |
| cement***\** |          |          |          |          |          |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+

*\* Denotes a FY 2009 National Emphasis Area*

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981609 .anchor}**[State CMV Safety Program
Objectives (1-2 Pages per Objective)]{.smallcaps}**

States are strongly encouraged to define at least one State-specific CMV
safety problem and establish State-specific performance objectives for
each **[recommended]{.underline}** State CMV Safety Program Objective in
this section. States shall define a State-specific CMV safety problem
statement and a State-specific performance objective for the
**[optional]{.underline}** State CMV Safety Program Objective at their
discretion. The State CMV Safety Program Objectives are as follows:

-   CMV Crash Reduction (Recommended),

-   CMV Safety Improvement (Recommended),

-   CMV HM Transportation Safety (Optional),

-   Passenger Transportation Safety (Recommended), and

-   CMV Safety Data Quality (Recommended if the State's Overall State
    Safety Data Quality (SSDQ) Rating is Poor/Red or Fair/Yellow\*.

\*The SSDQ Evaluation Ratings are available via the Data Quality Module
from FMCSA's Analysis and Information (A&I) Online website at:
[http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov](http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/).

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981610 .anchor}**CMV Crash Reduction
(Recommended)** - Describe the State's top CMV crash problem(s) to be
addressed with the MCSAP grant. Specific and quantifiable performance
objective(s) shall be established by the State to address each safety
problem identified. The crash reduction effort must be focused on
overall statewide fatal, injury and crash reduction, regional/corridor
or high crash locations/areas, or industry segments.

> **Problem Statement:** The State shall describe the identified CMV
> safety problem and the year the problem statement was initiated (i.e.,
> current or prior year). The description must provide some quantifiable
> representation of the problem (i.e., number/percentage of crashes,
> hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or other data
> identifier). It must also describe the progress achieved to date for
> those problem statements that were initiated prior to the current
> year. The State shall include the data source, date of the data
> snapshot, and who is responsible for its collection, maintenance, and
> analysis.
>
> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., reduction in the number/ percentage
> of crashes, hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or
> other data identifier) that it anticipates as a result of the
> strategies and activities deployed to address the Problem Statement.
> The State must include a date or timeframe (number of months/years) in
> which the outcome/result is expected.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
>  Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be reported quarterly and evaluated on an annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the CMV Crash Reduction Performance
> Objective. Note: A State may employ more than one strategy to address
> the Performance Objective. In those instances, the strategy, activity
> plan, activity measure and monitoring/evaluation sections must remain
> sequenced within the document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including locations or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will monitor
> and evaluate the effectiveness of each respective Program Activity
> Measure against the Program Activity Plan and Program Strategy. This
> must include incremental benchmarks for a multi-year strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**Status Update Section (CMV Crash Reduction):** For multi-year
Performance Objectives, the State shall provide a summary of the
previous year's strategies and activities and any problems encountered
and adjustments (e.g., modified activities or added new activities) that
were made. The Quarterly Reports could be used as an input for this
section.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981611 .anchor}**CMV Safety Improvement
(Recommended)** - Describe the State's efforts to address specific CMV
safety deficiencies, by improving safety compliance and performance
(including: industry segments, cargo types, primary safety violations,
driver behavior, etc.).

> **Problem Statement:** The State shall describe the identified CMV
> safety problem and the year the problem statement was initiated (i.e.,
> current or prior year). The description must provide some quantifiable
> representation of the problem (i.e., number/ percentage of crashes,
> hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or other data
> identifier). It must also describe the progress achieved to date for
> those problem statements that were initiated prior to the current
> year. The State shall include the data source, date of the data
> snapshot, and who is responsible for its collection, maintenance, and
> analysis.
>
> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., reduction in the number/ percentage
> of crashes, hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or
> other data identifier) that it anticipates as a result of the
> strategies and activities deployed to address the Problem Statement.
> The State must include a date or timeframe (number of months/years) in
> which the outcome/result is expected.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
>  Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be reported quarterly and evaluated on an annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the CMV Safety Improvement Performance
> Objective. Note: A State may employ more than one strategy to address
> the Performance Objective. In those instances, the strategy, activity
> plan, activity measure and monitoring/evaluation sections must remain
> sequenced within the document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including locations or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will monitor
> and evaluate the effectiveness of each respective Program Activity
> Measure against the Program Activity Plan and Program Strategy. This
> must include incremental benchmarks for a multi-year strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**Status Update Section (CMV Safety Improvement):** For multi-year
Performance Objectives, the State shall provide a summary of the
previous year's strategies and activities and any problems encountered
and adjustments (e.g., modified activities or added new activities) that
were made. The Quarterly Reports could be used as an input for this
section.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981612 .anchor}**CMV HM Transportation Safety
(Optional)** - Describe the State's efforts to address HM transportation
safety and security vulnerabilities.

> **Problem Statement:** The State shall describe the identified CMV
> safety problem and the year the problem statement was initiated (i.e.,
> current or prior year). The description must provide some quantifiable
> representation of the problem (i.e., number/percentage of crashes,
> hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or other data
> identifier). It must also describe the progress achieved to date for
> those problem statements that were initiated prior to the current
> year. This State shall include the data source, date of the data
> snapshot, and who is responsible for its collection, maintenance, and
> analysis.
>
> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., reduction in the number/percentage
> of crashes, hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or
> other data identifier) that it anticipates as a result of the
> strategies and activities deployed to address the Problem Statement.
> The State must include a date or timeframe (number of months/years) in
> which the outcome/result is expected.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
>  Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be reported quarterly and evaluated on an annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the CMV HM Transportation Safety
> Performance Objective. Note: A State may employ more than one strategy
> to address the Performance Objective. In those instances, the
> strategy, activity plan, activity measure and monitoring/evaluation
> sections must remain sequenced within the document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including locations or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured;
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will monitor
> and evaluate the effectiveness of each respective Program Activity
> Measure against the Program Activity Plan and Program Strategy. This
> must include incremental benchmarks for a multi-year strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)**Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**Status Update Section (CMV HM Transportation Safety):** For multi-year
Performance Objectives, the State shall provide a summary of the
previous year's strategies and activities and any problems encountered
and adjustments (e.g., modified activities or added new activities) that
were made. The Quarterly Reports could be used as an input for this
section.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981613 .anchor}**Passenger Transportation
Safety (Recommended)** - Describe the State's efforts to address
passenger transportation safety.

> **Problem Statement:** The State shall describe the identified CMV
> safety problem and the year the problem statement was initiated (i.e.,
> current or prior year). The description must provide some quantifiable
> representation of the problem (i.e., number/percentage of crashes,
> hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or other data
> identifier). It must also describe the progress achieved to date for
> those problem statements that were initiated prior to the current
> year. The State shall include the data source, date of the data
> snapshot, and who is responsible for its collection, maintenance, and
> analysis.
>
> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., reduction in the number/percentage
> of crashes, hazardous materials incidents, fatalities, injuries, or
> other data identifier) that it anticipates as a result of the
> strategies and activities deployed to address the Problem Statement.
> The State must include a date or timeframe (number of months/years) in
> which the outcome/result is expected.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
>  Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be reported quarterly and evaluated on an annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the Passenger Transportation Safety
> Performance Objective. Note: A State may employ more than one strategy
> to address the Performance Objective. In those instances, the
> strategy, activity plan, activity measure and monitoring/evaluation
> sections must remain sequenced within the document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including by location or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will monitor
> and evaluate the effectiveness of each respective Program Activity
> Measure against the Program Activity Plan and Program Strategy. This
> must include incremental benchmarks for a multi-year strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**Status Update Section (Passenger Transportation Safety):** For
multi-year Performance Objectives, the State shall provide a summary of
the previous year's strategies and activities and any problems
encountered and adjustments (e.g., modified activities or added new
activities) that were made. The Quarterly Reports could be used as an
input for this section.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981614 .anchor}**CMV Safety Data Quality
(Recommended if the State's Overall SSDQ Rating is Poor/Red or
Fair/Yellow\*)** - Describe the State's efforts to advance comprehensive
CMV safety data collection and reporting, including timeliness,
completeness and accuracy. \*The SSDQ Evaluation Ratings are available
via the Data Quality Module from FMCSA's Analysis and Information (A&I)
Online website at: [http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov](http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/).

> **Problem Statement:** The State shall describe the identified CMV
> safety data quality problem and the year the problem statement was
> initiated (i.e., current or prior year).   The description must
> provide some quantifiable representation of the problem (i.e., State
> Safety Data Quality Evaluation (SSDQ) Measures (crash or inspection
> records) or other data identifier).  It must also describe the
> progress achieved to date for those problem statements that were
> initiated prior to the current year. The State shall include the data
> source, date of the data snapshot, and who is responsible for its
> collection, maintenance, and analysis.
>
> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., SSDQ Measures improvements (crash
> or inspection records) or other data identifier) that it anticipates
> as a result of the strategies and activities deployed to address the
> Problem Statement. The State must include a date or timeframe (number
> of months/years) in which the outcome/result is expected.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
>  Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be reported quarterly and evaluated on an annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the CMV Safety Data Quality Performance
> Objective. Note: A State may employ more than one strategy to address
> the Performance Objective. In those instances, the strategy, activity
> plan, activity measure and monitoring/evaluation sections must remain
> sequenced within the document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed to
> generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed or other measures of
> the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will monitor
> and evaluate the effectiveness of each respective Program Activity
> Measure against the Program Activity Plan and Program Strategy. This
> must include incremental benchmarks for a multi-year strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**Status Update Section (CMV Safety Data Quality):** For multi-year
Performance Objectives, this section shall provide a summary of the
previous year's strategies and activities and any problems encountered
and adjustments that were made (e.g., modified activities or added new
activities). The Quarterly Reports could be used as an input for this
section.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981615 .anchor}**[National CMV Safety Program
Element Objectives (1-2 Pages per Objective)]{.smallcaps}**

States shall describe in this section how the State program addresses
the National Program Elements listed in 49 CFR 350.109. This description
shall include how the State intends to address the FY 2009 National
Emphasis Area(s) as defined in the FY 2009 MCSAP Planning Memorandum
even if the emphasis area has already been addressed in the State CMV
Safety Program Objectives as identified in Table 1. States must also
explain the rationale for resource allocation decisions. Note: States
must address the National Elements in the CVSP even if there are no
planned activities in the program element. The National Program Elements
include:

-   Driver/Vehicle Inspections

-   Traffic Enforcement

-   Compliance Reviews

-   Public Education and Awareness

-   Data Collection

FY 2009 National Emphasis Areas (not previously identified in Table 1)

-   If a National Emphasis Area(s) [is addressed in the National CMV
    Safety Program Element Objectives section (and was not previously
    identified in the State CMV Safety Program Objectives
    section]{.underline}), States shall identify the Emphasis Area and
    the National CMV Program Element in which the information is
    included (i.e., page number, program element).

-   If a National Emphasis Area(s) is [not addressed]{.underline} by the
    State, the State shall identify the Emphasis Area and describe the
    rationale for not addressing the Emphasis Area in the CVSP.

    []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981616 .anchor}**Driver/Vehicle
    Inspections**

Describe the State's implementation of a statewide CMV driver/vehicle
inspection program, including inspection goals, program quality
improvements, and overall performance measurements.

> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., program performance improvement
> measurements -- quality, efficiency, expanded participation, increased
> production, etc., or reduction in the number/percentage of crashes
> statewide) that it anticipates with implementation and delivery of the
> Driver/Vehicle Inspections Program Element.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
> Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be tracked and reported quarterly and evaluated on an
> annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the Driver/Vehicle Inspections
> Performance Objective. It is recommended that the State consider the
> following action areas -- efficiency, productivity, quality and
> uniformity within their overall State effort. Note: A State may employ
> more than one strategy to address the Performance Objective. In those
> instances, the strategy, activity plan, activity measure and
> monitoring/evaluation sections must remain sequenced within the
> document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including by location or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).\
> \
> Note: The State should complete **Table 2** on the following page to
> identify its Inspection Activity Projections for FY 2009.
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will
> monitor/track progress and evaluate the effectiveness of each
> respective Program Activity Measure against the Program Activity Plan
> and Program Strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**FY09-Inspection Activity Projections:** Use the following table to
identify the planned/expected performance output targets to achieve the
*Performance Objective.* Note: As stated in the 2009 MCSAP Planning
Memorandum, States are expected to increase the number of Level 3
inspections to meet or exceed the national average of 30 percent (%) in
FY 2009*.*

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981206 .anchor}Table 2. Driver/Vehicle
Inspection Performance Output Targets FY 2009

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981617 .anchor}Traffic Enforcement

Describe the State's implementation of a statewide CMV and non-CMV
traffic enforcement program effort in conjunction with an appropriate
level inspection and without an accompanying inspection; including
inspection traffic enforcement goals, program quality improvement and
overall performance measurements. States should include plans to conduct
comprehensive and highly visible traffic enforcement and CMV safety
inspection programs in high risk locations and corridors.

> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., program performance improvement
> measurements -- quality, efficiency, expanded participation, increased
> production, etc. or reduction in the number/percentage of crashes
> statewide) that it anticipates with implementation and delivery of the
> Traffic Enforcement Program Element.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
> Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be tracked and reported quarterly and evaluated on an
> annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the Traffic Enforcement Performance
> Objective. It is recommended that the State consider the following
> action areas -- efficiency, productivity, quality and uniformity
> within their overall State effort. Note: A State may employ more than
> one strategy to address the Performance Objective. In those instances,
> the strategy, activity plan, activity measure and
> monitoring/evaluation sections must remain sequenced within the
> document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including by location or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Note: The State should complete **Table 3** on the following page to
> identify its violation trends and the rational for program activities.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will
> monitor/track progress and evaluate the effectiveness of each
> respective Program Activity Measure against the Program Activity Plan
> and Program Strategy.
>
> **(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan
> \| Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation
>
> **Violation Trend Analysis Table (2005-2007):** States should use
> Table 3 to identify the State's violation trends ([relevant to their
> State]{.underline}) when identifying the rationale for Program
> Activities to achieve the Performance Objective. Sample violation
> entries are provided in the table for guidance *only* and should be
> deleted and replaced with State specific violations.
>
> Note: States can access Traffic Enforcement Violation data from
> FMCSA's A&I Online, Program Measures Traffic Enforcement Sub-module
> at: [http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov](http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/). To access the
> Traffic Enforcement Violation Detail report directly, go to:
> <http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/ProgramMeasures/TE/SR/AS/Report.asp>
>
> The list of Violation Codes is presented in Table 4 for use in
> choosing the violations relevant to the State to identify trends. The
> State should enter the relevant State violation codes as column labels
> in the Table.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981207 .anchor}Table 3. Violation Section 49
CFR 392--Trend Analysis (Not Quota) (2005-2007)

  ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
  **Year**   **Ex:.2S**   **Ex:.2F**   **Ex:.2LC**   **...**   **...**                                       

  **2007**                                                                                                   

  **2006**                                                                                                   

  **2005**                                                                                                   
  ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------- --------- --------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981208 .anchor}Table 4. Violation Section 49
CFR 392--Violation Codes

+-------------------------------------+--------------------------------+
| **Moving Violations:**              | **Railroad Crossing            |
|                                     | Violations:**                  |
| 392.2FC -- Following too close      |                                |
|                                     | 392.10A1 -- Failing to stop at |
| 392.2C -- Failure to obey traffic   | railroad grade (RR)            |
| control device                      | crossing-bus                   |
|                                     |                                |
| 392.2LC -- Improper lane changing   | 392.10A2 -- Failing to stop at |
|                                     | (RR) crossing-chlorine         |
| 392.2P -- Improper passing          |                                |
|                                     | 392.10A3 -- Failing to stop at |
| 392.2R -- Reckless driving          | (RR) crossing-placard          |
|                                     |                                |
| 392.2S -- Speeding                  | 392.10A4 -- Failing to stop at |
|                                     | (RR) crossing-HM cargo         |
| 392.2T -- Improper turns            |                                |
|                                     | **Miscellaneous Violations:**  |
| 392.2Y -- Failure to yield right of |                                |
| way                                 | 392.14 -- Failing to use       |
|                                     | caution for hazardous          |
| 392.3 -- Operating a CMV while ill  | conditions                     |
| or fatigued                         |                                |
|                                     | 392.16 -- Failing to use seat  |
| **Alcohol or Drug Related           | belt while operating a CMV     |
| Violations:**                       |                                |
|                                     | 392.71A -- Using/equipping CMV |
| 392.4 and 392.4A -- Driver uses or  | with a radar detector          |
| is in possession of drugs           |                                |
|                                     | 392.2 -- Local laws (general)  |
| 392.5 and 392.5A -- Driver uses or  |                                |
| is in possession of alcohol         |                                |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------------+

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981618 .anchor}Compliance Reviews

Describe the State's implementation of a statewide compliance review
program on both interstate and intrastate high risk motor carriers.

> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., program performance improvement
> measurements -- quality, efficiency, expanded participation or
> increased production, etc., or reduction in the number/percentage of
> crashes statewide) that it anticipates with implementation and
> delivery of the Compliance Reviews Program Element.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result to the stated Performance Objective.
> Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be tracked and reported quarterly and evaluated on an
> annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the Compliance Reviews Performance
> Objective. It is recommended that the State consider the following
> action areas -- efficiency, productivity, quality and uniformity
> within their overall State effort. Note: A State may employ more than
> one strategy to address the Performance Objective. In those instances,
> the strategy, activity plan, activity measure and
> monitoring/evaluation sections must remain sequenced within the
> document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including by location or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Note: The State should complete **Table 5** on the following page to
> identify its FY 2009 Compliance Review Activity Projections.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will
> monitor/track progress and evaluate the effectiveness of each
> respective Program Activity Measure against the Program Activity Plan
> and Program Strategy.
>
> **(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan
> \| Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

**FY 2009 Compliance Review Activity Projections:** Use the following
table to identify the projected performance output targets to achieve
the Performance Objective.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981209 .anchor}Table 5. Compliance Review
Activity Projections FY 2009

  ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
  **Type of     **Motor      **Motor       **Motor     **HM        **TOTAL**
  Operation**   Carrier      Carrier       Carrier     Shipper**   
                Property**   Passenger**   HM**                    

  Interstate    0            0             0           0           **0**

  Intrastate    0            0             0           0           **0**

  **Total       **0**        **0**         **0**       **0**       **0**
  Reviews**                                                        
  ------------- ------------ ------------- ----------- ----------- -----------

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981619 .anchor}**Public Education & Awareness**

Describe the State's implementation efforts related to CMV safety,
hazardous materials transportation, and Share the Road Safely campaign
initiatives; including outreach goals, program quality improvement and
overall performance measurements.

> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., program performance improvement
> measurements -- quality, efficiency, expanded participation, increased
> production, etc., or reduction in the number/percentage of crashes
> statewide) that it anticipates with implementation and delivery of the
> Public Education and Awareness Program Element.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result stated in the Performance Objective.
> Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be tracked and reported quarterly and evaluated on an
> annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the Public Education and Awareness
> Performance Objective. It is recommended that the State consider the
> following action areas -- efficiency, productivity, quality and
> uniformity within their overall State effort. Note: A State may employ
> more than one strategy to address the Performance Objective. In those
> instances, the strategy, activity plan, activity measure and
> monitoring/evaluation sections must remain sequenced within the
> document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed,
> including by location or assigned staff and the level of anticipated
> effort to generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed, number of staff hours
> spent/patrolled, number of details completed/performed, or other
> measures of the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will
> monitor/track progress and evaluate the effectiveness of each
> respective Program Activity Measure against the Program Activity Plan
> and Program Strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981620 .anchor}Data Collection

If a State's Overall SSDQ Rating\* is Poor/Red or Fair/Yellow the
State's data program should also be addressed in the State CMV Safety
Data Quality Objective section. Otherwise, the State may address its
efforts to advance its comprehensive CMV safety data collection and
reporting, including timeliness, accuracy and completion in this
section. For example, a State may have an overall SSDQ Rating of
Good/Green; however, there may be individual Crash or Inspection
Measures that have received "Fair" evaluation ratings where improvements
could be made. All of these measures should have data improvement
initiatives associated with them.

\*The SSDQ Evaluation Ratings are available via the Data Quality Module
from FMCSA's Analysis and Information (A&I) Online website at:
[http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov](http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/).

> **Performance Objective:** The State shall describe the expected
> quantifiable outcome/result (i.e., program performance improvement
> measurements -- quality, efficiency, expanded participation, SSDQ
> Measures improvements (crash or inspection records) or other data
> identifier) that it anticipates with implementation and delivery of
> the Data Collection Program Element.
>
> **Performance Measure:** The State shall describe the measure it will
> use to monitor progress and quantify the effective achievement of the
> desired outcome/result to the stated Performance Objective.
> Quantitative and/or qualitative progress towards achieving the
> objective will be tracked and reported quarterly and evaluated on an
> annual basis.

**(First Strategy Section)**

> Program Strategy: The State shall describe the Program Strategy it
> intends to employ to achieve the Data Collection Performance
> Objective. It is recommended that the State consider the following
> action areas -- efficiency, productivity, quality and uniformity
> within their overall State effort. Note: A State may employ more than
> one strategy to address the Performance Objective. In those instances,
> the strategy, activity plan, activity measure and
> monitoring/evaluation sections must remain sequenced within the
> document.
>
> Program Activity Plan: The State shall describe the Program Activities
> it intends to deploy and how these activities will address the Program
> Strategy. The State shall describe the activities to be performed to
> generate a positive impact on the Program Strategy.
>
> Program Activity Measure: The State shall describe how the activities
> described in the Program Activity Plan will be quantifiably measured,
> including the number of widgets to be performed or other measures of
> the particular activity(s).
>
> Monitoring & Evaluation: The State shall describe how it will
> monitor/track progress and evaluate the effectiveness of each
> respective Program Activity Measure against the Program Activity Plan
> and Program Strategy.

**(Next Strategy Section)** Program Strategy \| Program Activity Plan \|
Program Activity Measure \| Monitoring & Evaluation

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981621 .anchor}Financial Management

> This section shall establish State's overall financial management
> related to their CMV safety program activities. The focus shall be on
> the alignment of resources with program strategies and activities.

-   []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981622 .anchor}Financial Summary --
    Describe the State's financial status regarding CMV safety programs;
    including funding sources for MCSAP grant fund Maintenance of Effort
    (MOE) requirements, matching (20%) requirements, ability to receive
    federal funds (i.e., state appropriations), and the State's current
    status of MCSAP grant expenditures. This should include a trend
    analysis of grant fund expenditures for the past 3 years-- obligated
    versus expended.

-   []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981623 .anchor}Budget Summary -- This
    section shall provide a budget summary form including planned
    expenditures for the current fiscal year and projected number of
    activities in each national program element, except data collection.

    []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981210 .anchor}Table 6. FY 2009 National
    Program Element Budget Summary

  ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
  **National Program      **Estimated Expenses**  **Projected \# of
  Element**                                       Activities**

  Driver/Vehicle                                  
  Inspections                                     

  Traffic Enforcement                             

  Compliance Reviews                              

  Public Education and                            
  Awareness                                       

  Data Collection                                 N/A
  ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------

-   []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981624 .anchor}Line-Item Budget - A FY 2009
    CVSP Line-Item Budget format was distributed with the FY 2009 MCSAP
    Planning Memorandum.  As a result of the MCSAP reviews conducted to
    date, it was discovered that many States are unable to demonstrate
    how Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements have been met. A
    line-item budget similar to the MOE template format will ensure
    proper planning to meet MOE requirements. Therefore, the budget must
    include all MCSAP eligible expenses, including indirect costs,
    regardless of whether they are reimbursed by a grant. Because the
    CVSP budget is based on estimated awards, it should be noted that
    the budget will have to be revised to reflect the actual FY 2009
    grant awards. The actual award amounts will be used to execute the
    grant agreement. A line-item budget form is available as an excel
    spreadsheet at
    [www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm](http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm)

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981625 .anchor}Equipment Description - This
    section shall describe all CVSP budgeted equipment to the extent
    necessary to secure the FMCSA Division Administrator grant approval.
    At a minimum this section shall describe the following: (1) how the
    item will be used to promote CMV safety; (2) the number of items to
    be purchased; (3) who will be utilizing the item; and (4) how the
    item will be used and pro-rated if not dedicated to MCSAP (CMV
    safety).

    -   []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981626 .anchor}MOE Calculation
        Verification Report - This section shall describe the States MOE
        calculation, including a copy of the verification report on how
        the State calculated their certified MOE financial obligation. 
        The MOE calculation template was also distributed with the
        planning memo.  The template has been revised to more accurately
        reflect the application of indirect costs as a function of total
        direct costs. Indirect costs are MCSAP-eligible expenses as
        defined in 49 CFR 350.311 and include such costs as overhead
        personnel (including accounting or human resources staff), as
        well as office space, supplies, utilities, etc. Although the
        State may choose not to seek MCSAP reimbursement for indirect
        costs, indirect costs (either the State's approved indirect cost
        rate or actual indirect costs) are MCSAP-eligible expenses and,
        therefore, must be included in the State's MOE calculation.
        Specific information regarding indirect costs and indirect cost
        rates is forthcoming. The MOE calculation template form is
        available as an excel spreadsheet at
        [www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm](http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm)

        []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981627 .anchor}Grant & Certifications
        Documents

> This section shall contain the State's mandatory certifications and
> assurances as required by 49 CFR 350.213.

-   Signature Authority Designation -- Identification of the State
    officials authorized to execute, as a signatory FMCSA MCSAP grant
    documents and forms.

-   MCSAP-1 Grant Application -- Executed by the authorized State
    official. The grant application form is available at
    [www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm](http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm)

-   State Certification -- Executed by the authorized State official
    providing program assurances as prescribed in Title 49 CFR 350.211.
    The state certification form is available at
    [www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm](http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm)

> Regulatory Compatibility Review:

-   Results of the annual review to determine the compatibility of State
    laws and regulations with the FMCSRs and HMRs.

-   Copy of any new law or regulation affecting CMV safety enforcement
    that was enacted by the State since the last CVSP.

-   Annual Certification of Compatibility **-** Executed by the
    authorized State official attesting to the State's regulatory
    compatibility per 49 CFR 355.

    []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981628 .anchor}Program Contacts

    The State shall identify the program contacts within its MCSAP
    program.

    []{#__RefHeading___Toc198981629 .anchor}Data Analysis & Trends

The State shall provide summary data analysis used to prepare the CVSP,
including CMV crash statistics, data quality assessments and other
pertinent CMV safety data.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981630 .anchor}Attachments

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198981631 .anchor}State Training Plan

-   The State shall describe its CMV safety training plan for staff
    during the grant period, both NTC-authorized and state-mandatory
    training programs supported by the MCSAP grant program. The State
    Training Plan and NTC Schedule Intake forms are available as
    Microsoft Word documents at
    [www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm](http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety-security/safety-initiatives/mcsap/mcsapforms.htm)