UTILIZATION OF POULTRY LITTER AS FEED FOR BEEF CATTLE[^1]

Joseph P. Fontenot

John W. Hancock Jr. Professor

Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Blacksburg, Virginia 24061

My comments will be concerning nutritional value of poultry litter and
safety aspects of feeding poultry litter to beef cattle. I have
conducted research on feeding poultry litter since 1963. I am well
informed concerning the research conducted by other scientists also. I
am an animal nutritionist.

Poultry litter includes excreta, bedding, wasted feed and feathers.
Bedding may consist of wood shavings, sawdust, straw, peanut hulls or
other fibrous materials. Most of the poultry litter is from broiler
production. The litter may be from one crop of broilers or accumulated
over several crops of birds. The litter usually contains 20 to 25%
moisture.

Poultry litter is fed mainly to beef cows and stocker cattle. Little, if
any, is fed to fattening cattle. Substantiated amounts are fed in
important broiler-producing states. In Virginia, it is estimated that 20
to 25% of the litter is fed. In the U.S. 5.6 million tons of litter dry
matter are produced per year. If 20% of the litter is fed, over one
million tons are fed per year.

Research on feeding poultry litter has been conducted since the 1950's.
We started research at Virginia Tech in 1963. We have studied
nutritional value, performance of cattle fed litter, animal health
aspects, quality of animal products, and

residues in animal products.

Broiler litter contains 25 to 50% crude protein and 55 to 60% TDN, dry
matter basis, and is rich in essential minerals. Thus, the nutritional
value is similar to or higher than good quality legume hay. Performance
in beef cattle fed broiler litter has been similar to cattle fed
conventional feeds.

An important aspect is the effect of feeding animal wastes on quality of
animal products. In different experiments it has been found that feeding
broiler litter did not adversely affect carcass quality. Furthermore,
feeding the litter did not affect taste of the meat.

Processing of poultry litter is necessary for destruction of potential
pathogens, improvement of handling and storage characteristics, and
maintenance or enhancement of palatability. The main processes which
have been used are ensiling and deep stacking. Dehydration, with or
without pelleting, is also a satisfactory process if the cost is not too
high.

No documented toxic effect of cattle fed poultry litter has been
reported. Copper toxicity has been documented in sheep fed broiler
litter. However, the problem would not be severe in cattle since they
are not as sensitive to high dietary copper. In fact, we conducted an
experiment in beef females fed diets containing high levels of litter
with high copper levels during the winter feeding period for 7 years. No
signs of copper toxicity were seen. Liver copper was increased in the
spring in cows fed poultry litter, but the levels decreased in the fall
after the grazing season.

Poultry litter is a potential source of pathogenic microorganisms.
However, a recent report in which 86 samples of poultry litter obtained
in Georgia were tested for pathogenic microorganisms indicated that even
prior to processing, the presence of pathogens is not a serious problem.
No *Salmonella* or *E. coli* 0157/H7 was isolated from any of the 86
samples. Nevertheless, poultry litter should be processed prior to
feeding.

Incidents of botulism caused by *Clostridium botulinium* have been
reported in cattle fed poultry litter in some countries. This problem,
in all cases, was caused by the presence of poultry carcasses in the
litter. However, no such problems have occurred in the U.S. Good
management, including exclusion of dead birds from the litter, and
appropriate processing will prevent this problem. There are no reports
showing agent(s) causing BSE in poultry litter.

With modest withdrawal periods, no objectional residues in meat have
occurred from cattle fed poultry litter. Mycotoxins pose no greater
problem in poultry litter than in conventional feedstuffs. No evidence
has been obtained of pesticide residues in animal tissues from animals
fed poultry litter. No residues of heavy metals were detected in the
meat and liver from cattle fed poultry litter after a 1-day withdrawal.
Medicinal drugs may be found in litter if the drugs were included in the
diet of chicks. However, after a 5-day withdrawal, there were no
residues of the drugs.

Most states follow the Association of American Feed Control Officials
(AAFCO) model regulation for processed animal wastes. In other states
the regulations are similar to the AAFCO regulation. The salient points
of the AAFCO regulation are: 1) the waste must be processed so it will
be free of pathogenic organisms, 2) if the waste does not contain drug
residues, no withdrawal period is required and the waste can be fed to
any class of animals, 3) if the waste contains drug residues, a 15-d
withdrawal is required prior to slaughtering animals.

The question concerning BSE in feeding poultry litter was addressed by
the FDA in July, 1998 (2) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 589.2000) in
Guidance for Industry #76. The agency (FDA) responded as follows to the
question: Can chicken litter be fed to cattle if the poultry might have
been fed prohibited material? The answer: "Yes. The FDA has no evidence
that the agent that causes BSE would survive the chicken intestinal
tract. FDA expects the states to require recycled animal waste to
conform to the definitions promulgated by the Association of American
Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) as published in its official publication
and as described in its 'Model Regulations for Processed Animal Waste
Products as Animal Feed Ingredients.' Under the AAFCO Model Regulation,
in order for this product to be used in a commercial feed, it must be
registered/licensed within a State, and be assayed periodically for
*Salmonella* and *E. coli* bacteria, heavy metals, pesticides, drugs,
parasitic larva or ova, and mycotoxins."

The question may be asked, "Why do beef cattle producers feed poultry?"
As stated above, if processed appropriately, feeding poultry litter is a
safe practice. Usually, it is economical to feed poultry litter. Using
present prices for conventional feeds, poultry litter is worth about
\$100 per ton, based on its nutritional value. Usually, the price of
poultry litter is \$10 per ton. Even after transporting the litter 200
miles, the total price of the litter, including transportation, is about
\$30 per ton. Another advantage of feeding poultry litter is that it is
a good substitute for hay, especially during periods of hay shortage due
to drought.

Feeding poultry litter has benefits for the poultry industry. An
environmental problem is over-application of poultry litter to the soil,
possibly resulting in high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in the
water supply.

In conclusion, poultry litter can be used as a feedstuff for cattle if
processed properly to eliminate pathogens. Performance of animals fed
the waste is similar to that of control animals if the nutrient levels
are equalized. With good management and appropriate withdrawal, feeding
litter does not result in harmful residues in animal products. The
higher value of poultry litter as a feedstuff than fertilizer justifies
transportation of the waste outside of areas where the waste is
produced.

[^1]: ^a^ Presented at FDA Public Hearing, Kansas City, MO, October 30,
    2001, on animal feeding regulation "Animal Proteins Prohibited in
    Ruminant Feed"\--Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part
    589.2000.