Exhibit 300-1 Project Profile

**Agency:** Department of the Interior

**Bureau/Office: National Park Service**

**Location in Budget: Office of the Chief Information Officer, National
Information Systems Center**

**Account Title: ONPS, Park Management, Resource Stewardship**

**Account Identification Code: 1036**

**Program Activity: GIS**

**Name of Project: NPS GIS Program/I-Enterprise Geospatial Info.
Management**

**Unique Project Identifier: DOI 03 Submission was previously named
I-EGIS**

**Project Composition:** (This project is)

\_\_\_\_\_% Financial

\_\_\_\_\_% Security

\_\_\_Y\_\_Homeland Security (Y/N)

\_\_\_\_Y_Current E-Gov (Y/N/Potential)

**Summary of Spending for Project Stages**

(In Thousands)

Estimates for 2006 and beyond are for planning and do not represent
funding decisions

PY-1& PY CY BY BY+1 BY+2 BY+3 BY+4&

<table style="width:100%;">
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 23%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 0%" />
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 0%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="11"><p><strong>I.A. SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT
STAGES<sup>*</sup></strong></p>
<p><strong>(In Millions)</strong></p></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td><strong>EXISTING 300</strong></td>
<td>PY-1 and Earlier</td>
<td><p>PY</p>
<p>2003</p></td>
<td><p>CY</p>
<p>2004</p></td>
<td><p>BY</p>
<p>2005</p></td>
<td><p>BY+1</p>
<p>2006</p></td>
<td colspan="2"><p>BY+2</p>
<p>2007</p></td>
<td><p>BY+3</p>
<p>2008</p></td>
<td>BY+4 &amp; Beyond</td>
<td colspan="2">Total</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td><u>Planning</u>:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Budget Authority</td>
<td>0.03</td>
<td>0.04</td>
<td>0.07</td>
<td>0.53</td>
<td>0.30</td>
<td>0.10</td>
<td colspan="2">0.20</td>
<td>0.05</td>
<td colspan="2">1.32</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Outlays</td>
<td>0.03</td>
<td>0.04</td>
<td>0.07</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td><u>Full Acquisition</u> :</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Budget Authority</td>
<td>8.75</td>
<td>8.35</td>
<td>8.35</td>
<td>9.20</td>
<td>9.20</td>
<td>9.20</td>
<td colspan="2">9.45</td>
<td>9.45</td>
<td colspan="2">71.95</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Outlays</td>
<td>8.75</td>
<td>8.35</td>
<td>8.35</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td><u>Total, sum of stages</u>:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Budget Authority</td>
<td>8.78</td>
<td>8.39</td>
<td>8.42</td>
<td>9.73</td>
<td>9.50</td>
<td>9.30</td>
<td colspan="2">9.65</td>
<td>9.50</td>
<td colspan="2">73.27</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Outlays</td>
<td>8.78</td>
<td>8.39</td>
<td>0.00</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td><u>Maintenance</u>:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Budget Authority</td>
<td>15.32</td>
<td>14.31</td>
<td>13.48</td>
<td>15.23</td>
<td>16.23</td>
<td>16.29</td>
<td colspan="2">16.29</td>
<td>16.29</td>
<td colspan="2">123.44</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Outlays</td>
<td>15.32</td>
<td>14.31</td>
<td>13.48</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td><u>Total, All Stages:</u></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Budget Authority</td>
<td>24.10</td>
<td>22.70</td>
<td>21.90</td>
<td>24.96</td>
<td>25.73</td>
<td>25.59</td>
<td colspan="2">25.94</td>
<td>25.79</td>
<td colspan="2">196.71</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Outlays</td>
<td>24.10</td>
<td>22.70</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td><u>FTE Costs</u></td>
<td>14.49</td>
<td>13.48</td>
<td>13.48</td>
<td>15.09</td>
<td>16.09</td>
<td>16.09</td>
<td colspan="2">16.09</td>
<td>16.09</td>
<td colspan="2">120.90</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Planning 05, 08- for restructuring and re-engineering new DOI enterprise
software license agreement, geodatabase and infrastructure.

Full acquisition costs for 05 and out-years include DOI EGIS costs in
addition to requested NPS GIS requested base increase.

## 

## I.A. Project Description

The NPS GIS Program is managed by the OCIO and the GIS Council (GISC), a
group of 20 that includes regional, program and OCIO representatives.
The GIS infrastructure was developed in 1991 when 9 regional GIS
technical support centers were co-funded by a new initiative in the NPS
Natural Resources Program. In addition some program offices also have
GIS centers to support specific goals such as the cultural resources GIS
office that has supported state heritage efforts, civil and
revolutionary war battlefield preservation studies. New technology and
the widespread use of GIS at 1200 sites across the NPS require a new
enterprise business model, geodatabase development, and enhanced
infrastructure.

The NPS GISC plans to analyze the growing list of NPS requirements for
GIS in light of system integration and using locational information as a
backbone for most NPS information systems while determining the most
appropriate infrastructure and data management architecture for internal
and public use. This study will support the DOI EGIS initiatives, DOI
GIS Domain Architecture Team activities, and other E-GOV portals in
FY04. It will then be revisited in FY08, when DOI GIS software contracts
come up for renewal.

[Note]{.underline}: As a result of a review of the current FY 04 USGS
Exhibit 300 by the Department's Information Technology Management
Council, and at the recommendation of the Interior Management Council,
the USGS EGIS project has been elevated to a Departmental initiative
under USGS leadership. This offers the opportunity to leverage the
benefits identified in the USGS effort across other bureaus. The NPS is
a full participant in the EGIS workgroup and has already begun some
needs analysis for Fire, Natural Resource, Cultural Resource, and Lands
programs.

The NPS 300-1 also includes other activities that relate to E-GOV
initiatives such as Geo Spatial One Stop and Rec.gov, National Spatial
Data Infrastructure, OMB A-16 mandates including NPS leadership for
Cultural Resource data standards and management, future re-engineering
and integration with FMSS, NILS, law enforcement systems, and
infrastructure.

With this expansion of the Enterprise GIS initiative to the Departmental
level, a review of the state-of-GIS at all bureaus, together with a
comprehensive needs assessment and a requirements analysis will be
scheduled for FY04 to more fully examine all aspects of this initiative
in the context of the OMB A-11, Exhibit 300.

Elements of this DOI-EGIS initiative include an inventory and analysis
of the enterprise to quantify the GIS environment and to begin assessing
the needs of the enterprise. The EGIS initiative is currently in this
analysis phase. Part of assessing those needs is obtaining an
understanding of the requirements for security. Security is within the
EGIS development process a requirement that needs to be defined and met;
it includes a data sensitivity, criticality study and an initial risk
assessment conducted in accordance with OMB A-130, Appendix III.
Security requirements will then be incorporated into the EGIS
architecture, design, operating processes, and implementation plan.

As a framework, EGIS touches all elements of GIS activities: information
technology and information system infrastructures (computer systems,
networks, geographic information systems, global positioning systems,
data, databases, information, tools, models, etc.) and business
infrastructures (standards, business processes, policy, regulations).
Enterprise GIS provides the strategy for these elements. When assembled
and implemented, will offer more efficient and effective use of data
gathering, analysis, better enabled science, provide a more effective
access to data and information, improve decision making, etc. One
example is the under-development, geo-referenced DOI Facility Locator
Service that, through drill-downs from a map of the U.S. to the
street-level, allows access to successively more detailed information
about DOI facilities down to individual employees and location of
equipment in a building.

Enterprise GIS creates an enabling environment which ensures that
geospatial activities are performed uniformly, geospatial data can be
exchanged freely, and geographic information systems and tools conform
to DOI, NIST, FGDC and commonly accepted industry standards. The EGIS
environment will streamline GIS business practices; geospatial data
formats and structures; and tools used for GIS data access and
retrieval, scientific analysis, modeling, visualization and data
exchange. It will be a catalyst for modernization of the IT
infrastructure used by geographic information systems; for establishing
guidelines for the development of common GIS applications, and decision
support and information systems with geospatial components.

## I.C. Performance Goals and Measures

During FY 2004, a comprehensive needs assessment and requirements
analysis will be conducted across all the DOI bureaus to review bureau
business goals and current status with regard to use of GIS. This will
involve data gathering (surveys, questionnaires, focus groups),
analysis, and development of findings/conclusions for the following
areas in all bureaus: strategic and tactical plans; performance goals;
risk factors; data environments (databases, web sites, data exchange
mechanisms, security/privacy, publications, architectures); GIS
environments (tools, models, applications, COTS/GOTS, standards,
protocols, architectures); IT and telecommunication environments
(architectures, security, capacity, usage, capitalized equipment);
business environments (GIS business practices (operation & production);
cultural aspects; and relationships with partners. Results of the needs
assessment and requirements analysis will be used to establish the
performance baseline for each strategic goal. It is anticipated that
specific performance measures will be established by approximately June
2004, following finalization of the draft DOI Strategic Plan, and will
be further refined by the results of the DOI and NPS planned needs
assessment and requirements analysis as described above.

+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
|   | **S      | *   | **Planned   | **   | **Planned**      | **Act |
|   | trategic | *Ex | Performance | Actu |                  | ual** |
|   | G        | ist | Improvement | al** | **Performance**  |       |
|   | oal(s)** | ing | Goal**      |      |                  | **Pe  |
|   |          | B   |             | **Pe | **Metric**       | rform |
|   | **Sup    | ase |             | rf** |                  | nce** |
|   | ported** | lin |             |      |                  |       |
|   |          | e** |             | **Im |                  | **M   |
|   |          |     |             | prvm |                  | etric |
|   |          |     |             | nt** |                  | Resu  |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | lts** |
|   |          |     |             | **R  |                  |       |
|   |          |     |             | esul |                  |       |
|   |          |     |             | ts** |                  |       |
+===+==========+=====+=============+======+==================+=======+
| F | Serving  | Map | Provide     | TBD  | \% Communities   | Prot  |
| Y | Comm     | s.n | Information | 0    | and NPS          | otype |
| 0 | unities/ | ps. | to Assist   | 3/04 | rangers/fire GIS | NPS   |
| 3 | Protect  | gov | C           |      | specialists      | sp    |
|   | Lives    |     | ommunities, |      | using GIS for    | atial |
|   | and      | &   | NPS         |      | Hazard           | data  |
|   | Property | Na  | Rangers/Law |      | Mitigation       | del   |
|   |          | tl. | E           |      | Preparedness,    | ivery |
|   |          | G   | nforcement/ |      | Law Enforcement, | web   |
|   |          | eog | Fire GIS    |      | and Fire         | ser   |
|   |          | rap | specialists |      | Management.      | vices |
|   |          | hic | in Managing |      |                  | for   |
|   |          | T   | Risks from  |      |                  | Fire  |
|   |          | opo | Natural     |      |                  | mana  |
|   |          | ser | Hazards,    |      |                  | gers, |
|   |          | ver | Wild fires, |      |                  | per   |
|   |          |     | etc.        |      |                  | incid |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | ent - |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | Data  |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | is    |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | deli  |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | vered |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | and   |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | us    |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | eable |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | 100%  |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Protect  | TBD | Develop     | TBD  | Use of developed | \% or |
| Y | the      |     | standard    | 0    | techniques for   | acres |
| 0 | Env      |     | GIS/image   | 4/05 | NPS decision     | of    |
| 3 | ironment |     | processing  |      | making, land     | newly |
|   | and      |     | techniques  |      | acquisition      | cons  |
|   | Preserve |     | for change  |      | strategies, and  | erved |
|   | Our      |     | detection   |      | planing.         | and   |
|   | N        |     | and long    |      |                  | miti  |
|   | ation\'s |     | term        |      |                  | gated |
|   | Natural  |     | monitoring. |      |                  | areas |
|   | and      |     |             |      |                  |       |
|   | Cultural |     |             |      |                  |       |
|   | R        |     |             |      |                  |       |
|   | esources |     |             |      |                  |       |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Provide  | TBD | Work with   | TBD  | Develop trails   | \%    |
| Y | Re       |     | Natl.       | 0    | data standards   | i     |
| 0 | creation |     | Geographic  | 4/05 | and IMS          | mprov |
| 3 | for      |     | for         |      | integration      | ement |
|   | America  |     | stewardship |      | plan.            | of    |
|   |          |     | of Trails   |      |                  | trail |
|   |          |     | data and    |      | Participate in   | data  |
|   |          |     | public      |      | Rec.gov          | acc   |
|   |          |     | d           |      | prototype.       | uracy |
|   |          |     | istribution |      |                  | and   |
|   |          |     | of that     |      |                  | curr  |
|   |          |     | data.       |      |                  | ency. |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Protect  | TBD | C           |      | Percent          | N     |
| Y | the      |     | onservation |      | improvement in   | umber |
| 0 | Env      |     | and         |      | data quality,    | of    |
| 4 | ironment |     | enhancement |      | analysis,        | dep   |
|   | and      |     | of park     |      | mapping of       | loyed |
|   | Preserve |     | resources   |      | critical habitat | nat   |
|   | Our      |     | via         |      | for endangered   | ional |
|   | N        |     | standard    |      | species, and     | GIS   |
|   | ation\'s |     | GIS         |      | visualization of | ap    |
|   | Natural  |     | a           |      | threats and      | plica |
|   | and      |     | pplications |      | solutions        | tions |
|   | Cultural |     |             |      | through          | (e.g. |
|   | R        |     |             |      | application of   | E-N   |
|   | esources |     |             |      | GIS technology.  | EPA). |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Provide  | Map | Public Use  |      | Increase number  | Add   |
| Y | Re       | s.n | and         |      | of NPS geo-data  | G     |
| 0 | creation | ps. | Enjoyment   |      | layers and links | eo-ca |
| 4 | for      | gov |             |      | interpretive     | ching |
|   | America  |     |             |      | information by   | po    |
|   |          |     |             |      | 10%. Assist with | licy, |
|   |          |     |             |      | further          | Trail |
|   |          |     |             |      | development of   | route |
|   |          |     |             |      | REC.gov          | ap    |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | plica |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | tion, |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | and 2 |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | new   |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | la    |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | yers. |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Provide  | TBD | P           |      | Increasing       | De    |
| Y | Re       |     | artnerships |      | partnerships     | velop |
| 0 | creation |     |             |      | with tribes,     | & use |
| 4 | for      |     |             |      | states, other    | rec.  |
|   | America  |     |             |      | Federal          | data  |
|   |          |     |             |      | Agencies, and    | stan  |
|   |          |     |             |      | local            | dards |
|   |          |     |             |      | governments      | for   |
|   |          |     |             |      | E-Gov            | use   |
|   |          |     |             |      | initiatives,     | by    |
|   |          |     |             |      | Recreation       | c     |
|   |          |     |             |      | One-Stop         | ooper |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | ators |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Protect  | TBD | A-16        |      | Increasing       | \% of |
| Y | the      |     | Leadership  |      | cooperation with | CR    |
| 0 | Env      |     | in Cultural |      | DOI partners,    | ge    |
| 4 | ironment |     | Resources   |      | promoting CR     | odata |
|   | and      |     |             |      | data standards,  | stand |
|   | Preserve |     |             |      | sharing, and     | ards, |
|   | Our      |     |             |      | reducing the     | rev   |
|   | N        |     |             |      | need for other   | ision |
|   | ation\'s |     |             |      | agencies to      | of    |
|   | Natural  |     |             |      | collect the same | NPS   |
|   | and      |     |             |      | data.            | CR    |
|   | Cultural |     |             |      |                  | data  |
|   | R        |     |             |      |                  | bases |
|   | esources |     |             |      |                  |       |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Serving  | TBD | Expand      |      | \% NPS units     | Est   |
| Y | Comm     |     | a           |      | using GIS for    | ablis |
| 0 | unities/ |     | vailability |      | crime mapping,   | hment |
| 4 | Protect  |     | of GIS data |      | incident         | of    |
|   | Lives    |     | to deployed |      | command, hazard  | IMS   |
|   | and      |     | NPS units   |      | mitigation,      | and   |
|   | Property |     | and USPP    |      | preparedness     | m     |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | obile |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | GIS   |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | unit  |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | proto |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | types |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Serving  | TBD | Expand      |      | \% Communities   | Prot  |
| Y | Comm     |     | a           |      | and NPS units    | otype |
| 0 | unities/ |     | vailability |      | using GIS for    | NPS   |
| 5 | Protect  |     | of GIS data |      | crime mapping,   | IMS   |
|   | Lives    |     | to deployed |      | incident         | and   |
|   | and      |     | NPS units,  |      | command, hazard  | m     |
|   | Property |     | USPP, state |      | mitigation,      | obile |
|   |          |     | and local   |      | preparedness     | unit  |
|   |          |     | agencies    |      |                  | i     |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | ntegr |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | ation |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | with  |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | local |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | age   |
|   |          |     |             |      |                  | ncies |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Protect  | TBD | Lead and    |      | Customer         | \% of |
| Y | the      |     | Facilitate  |      | satisfaction     | NPS   |
| 0 | Env      |     | Exchange    |      | with ease, speed | CR    |
| 5 | ironment |     | and Use of  |      | of access,       | and   |
|   | and      |     | NP and CR   |      | quality and      | NR    |
|   | Preserve |     | information |      | currency of      | data  |
|   | Our      |     | and         |      | information and  | i     |
|   | N        |     | knowledge   |      | tools.           | ntegr |
|   | ation\'s |     |             |      |                  | ation |
|   | Natural  |     |             |      |                  | with  |
|   | and      |     |             |      |                  | IMS   |
|   | Cultural |     |             |      |                  |       |
|   | R        |     |             |      |                  |       |
|   | esources |     |             |      |                  |       |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+
| F | Protect  | TBD | Lead and    |      | Customer         | \% of |
| Y | the      |     | Facilitate  |      | satisfaction     | NPS   |
| 0 | Env      |     | Exchange    |      | with ease, speed | facil |
| 5 | ironment |     | and Use of  |      | of access,       | ities |
|   | and      |     | Facilities  |      | quality and      | and   |
|   | Preserve |     | and Lands   |      | currency of      | lands |
|   | Our      |     | information |      | information and  | data  |
|   | N        |     | and         |      | tools            | i     |
|   | ation\'s |     | knowledge   |      |                  | ntegr |
|   | Natural  |     |             |      |                  | ation |
|   | and      |     |             |      |                  | with  |
|   | Cultural |     |             |      |                  | IMS   |
|   | R        |     |             |      |                  |       |
|   | esources |     |             |      |                  |       |
+---+----------+-----+-------------+------+------------------+-------+

## I.H.2. Original Baseline

## This is a GSS request in support of the DOI-EGIS.

+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| The NPS costs and |    |    |      |                  |            |
| schedule goals    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| for this phase or |    |    |      |                  |            |
| segment of the    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| project, major    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| project           |    |    |      |                  |            |
| milestones or     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| events, etc. are  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| a subset of the   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| E-GIS costs and   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| schedule goals.   |    |    |      |                  |            |
|                   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| ###               |    |    |      |                  |            |
| ###### Cost and S |    |    |      |                  |            |
| chedule Goals: Or |    |    |      |                  |            |
| iginal Baseline f |    |    |      |                  |            |
| or Phase/Segment/ |    |    |      |                  |            |
| Module of Project |    |    |      |                  |            |
|                   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| ######### NPS\*   |    |    |      |                  |            |
|                   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| [N                |    |    |      |                  |            |
| ote]{.underline}: |    |    |      |                  |            |
| With the          |    |    |      |                  |            |
| expansion of the  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| Enterprise GIS    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| initiative to the |    |    |      |                  |            |
| Departmental      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| level, a review   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| of the            |    |    |      |                  |            |
| state-of-GIS at   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| all bureaus,      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| together with a   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| comprehensive     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| needs assessment  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| and a             |    |    |      |                  |            |
| requirements      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| analysis will be  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| scheduled for     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| FY03 to more      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| fully examine all |    |    |      |                  |            |
| aspects of this   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| initiative in the |    |    |      |                  |            |
| context of the    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| OMB A-11, Exhibit |    |    |      |                  |            |
| 300.              |    |    |      |                  |            |
|                   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| [N                |    |    |      |                  |            |
| ote]{.underline}: |    |    |      |                  |            |
| As DOI bureaus    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| join the          |    |    |      |                  |            |
| initiative, each  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| bureau's unique   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| risk exposure     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| will be reviewed  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| and the DOI EGIS  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| risk mitigation   |    |    |      |                  |            |
| strategy          |    |    |      |                  |            |
| reassessed and    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| modified as       |    |    |      |                  |            |
| appropriate.      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| Furthermore,      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| although not      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| explicitly        |    |    |      |                  |            |
| articulated in    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| this project plan |    |    |      |                  |            |
| due to its nature |    |    |      |                  |            |
| as an ongoing     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| activity, all     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| risk factors      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| dealing with      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| change in         |    |    |      |                  |            |
| general, the      |    |    |      |                  |            |
| business          |    |    |      |                  |            |
| environment, data |    |    |      |                  |            |
| and information,  |    |    |      |                  |            |
| technology,       |    |    |      |                  |            |
| strategic issues, |    |    |      |                  |            |
| security, privacy |    |    |      |                  |            |
| and project       |    |    |      |                  |            |
| resources will be |    |    |      |                  |            |
| monitored and     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| controlled        |    |    |      |                  |            |
| throughout the    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| life cycle of     |    |    |      |                  |            |
| this project.     |    |    |      |                  |            |
+===================+====+====+======+==================+============+
| ####              | ** |    | **Du |                  |            |
| ##### Description | Sc |    | rati |                  |            |
|                   | he |    | on** |                  |            |
|                   | du |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | le |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | ** |    |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
|                   | *  | *  | **Da | **Planned Cost   | **Funding  |
|                   | *S | *E | ys** | (\$millions)**   | Agency**   |
|                   | ta | nd |      |                  |            |
|                   | rt | Da |      |                  |            |
|                   | Da | te |      |                  |            |
|                   | te | ** |      |                  |            |
|                   | ** |    |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| **FY 2005 -- FY   |    | *  | *    |                  |            |
| 2009**            |    | *  | * ** |                  |            |
|                   |    | ** |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Plan Project      | No | \- | 61   | 0.25             | NPS        |
|                   | v- | Ja |      |                  |            |
|                   | 04 | n- |      |                  |            |
|                   |    | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Needs Assessment  | Ja | Ju | 181  | 0.46             | NPS        |
|                   | n- | l- |      |                  |            |
|                   | 05 | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Inventory of      | No | Ju | 242  | 0.05             | NPS        |
| Existing          | v- | l- |      |                  |            |
| Geospatial Data   | 04 | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Requirements      | Ju | Oc | 92   | 0.16             | NPS        |
| Analysis          | l- | t- |      |                  |            |
|                   | 05 | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Server/Service    | Ju | Oc | 92   | 0.15             | NPS        |
| Configuration     | l- | t- |      |                  |            |
| Assessment        | 05 | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Identification of | No | Fe | 92   | 0.04             | NPS        |
| c                 | v- | b- |      |                  |            |
| ritical/important | 04 | 05 |      |                  |            |
| Projects/Programs |    |    |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Pilot Mobile GIS  | Ja | Ja | 730  | 0.10             | NPS        |
| Technology        | n- | n- |      |                  |            |
|                   | 05 | 07 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Development of    | Fe | Ju | 120  | 0.10             | NPS        |
| Enterprise        | b- | n- |      |                  |            |
| Prototype Model   | 05 | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Develop Common    | Ju | Ja | 579  | 0.09             | NPS        |
| Project           | n- | n- |      |                  |            |
| Applications      | 05 | 07 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Develop/          | De | Ja | 396  | 0.05             | NPS        |
| Re-engineer       | c- | n- |      |                  |            |
| Geospatial        | 05 | 07 |      |                  |            |
| Infrastructure    |    |    |      |                  |            |
| for GOS portal    |    |    |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Obtain ISP        | Ju | Se | 92   | 0.05             | NPS        |
| Services          | n- | p- |      |                  |            |
|                   | 07 | 07 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Completion of GIS | Ja | Se | 243  | 0.10             | NPS        |
| Model based on    | n- | p- |      |                  |            |
| Prototype         | 07 | 07 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Maintenance of    | Se | Se | 793  | 0.40             | NPS        |
| Enterprise        | p- | p- |      |                  |            |
| capabilities      | 07 | 09 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Enterprise        | No | No | 1096 | 1.60             | NPS        |
| Software License  | v- | v- |      |                  |            |
|                   | 02 | 05 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| Enhanced          | Oc | Se | 335  | 0.25             | NPS        |
| Operation Costs   | t- | p- |      |                  |            |
|                   | 05 | 06 |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
| **Completion      | *  |    |      | 3.88             |            |
| Date**:           | *T |    |      |                  |            |
| September, 2009   | ot |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | al |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | Co |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | st |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | at |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | C  |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | om |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | pl |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | et |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | io |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | n: |    |      |                  |            |
|                   | ** |    |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+
|                   |    |    |      |                  |            |
+-------------------+----+----+------+------------------+------------+

## II.A. Enterprise Architecture 

The NPS participates in the DOI GIS Software Enterprise Software
Agreement (as executed under the USGS TIA authority), EGIS work group,
DOI and NPS facilities management workgroups, interagency fire
management and GIS groups, and is the lead for cultural resource spatial
information activities at the Federal and DOI level. Existing
application systems that fall under the EGIS or NPS umbrella will remain
independent, owned and operated as they are now. (The responsibility for
security, privacy, architecture, risk, GPEA, etc. also remains with
those systems and their owners.) However, EGIS and the NPS will define
requirements for security and privacy to guarantee that systems
developed within its framework, tools purchased and processes designed
or reengineered in its environment follow mandated standards as well as
commonly accepted business and technology practices. The NPS has several
guidelines for GPS, GIS, data specifications and field data collection
that are compliant with DOI and FGDC standards and has maintained a node
on the National Spatial Data Infrastructure or Geo-Spatial One Stop
since 1993.

Examples of projects that have potential under EGIS are the Facility
Locator Service. The NPS has begun to collect locational information on
facilities that can be used for homeland security, fire and facilities
management, and visitor services. The NPS Interactive Map Center
(maps.nps.gov), hosted by ESRI, will serve as a prototype for spatially
enabling Rec.gov and providing a cost efficient model for contracting
out other DOI web mapping services.

The EGIS and related NPS projects will be conducted in coordinated
phases so that there is no duplication of effort and all results and
lessons can be shared at the DOI level. A pilot will be used to test the
application of mobile GIS technology---possibly using a CRADA
arrangement---to facilitate field data processing and distribution. The
NPS U.S. Park Police is striving to implement mobile GIS and GPS for
their officers, vehicles, and incident command and integrate this into
the new incident command and reporting system scheduled to begin late 03
and early 04. Following phases will include prototype development,
expanded GIS technical support, guidelines, indexing software
development, GIS application and infrastructure modifications, training,
and implementation. Stakeholders in the NPS EGIS efforts are:

-   DOI decision makers

-   Partners: Universities, NASA, National Geographic Maps, Student
    Conservation Association

-   Standards organizations (FGDC, OGC)

-   Geospatial One-Stop, Rec.gov and other *e*-Gov program managers

-   Homeland Defense program managers

-   Emergency and FIRE (NIFC) management service organizations and first
    responders

-   Land use and resource managers

-   Federal, State and local governments and heritage associations

Interior is in the process of completing a high-level Enterprise
Architecture and beginning a mid-level one. To date, we have established
our Common Requirements Vision, our Conceptual Architecture and
associated principles, and our Technical Reference Model.

This project was initiated and developed prior to development of the
architecture. However, it has been compared against the IEA guidance
requirements, and meets some of them. As the project is modified or
replaced, each iteration will move toward fuller conformance with the
IEA.

**I.B. Security**

The NPS Interactive Map Center is hosted by ESRI, which provides all
standard commercial security.

The NPS GIS Data Clearinghouse is managed by North Carolina State
University and is in compliance with standard university and state
security regulations.

**II.C. GPEA**

The DOI Enterprise GIS initiative is in the planning stage and the
applicability of GPEA is not known at this time. However, in FY04 the
initiative moves into its analysis phase where the relationship to GPEA
of NPS efforts will be clarified and any applicable GPEA requirements
addressed.