**[COORDINATION PLAN]{.underline}**

**For**

**PROJECT: ST-059-261-004**

**HELENA BYPASS**

**SHELBY COUNTY**

**[Purpose(s):]{.underline}**

The purposes of the coordination plan are to facilitate and document the
lead agencies' structured interaction with the public and other agencies
and to inform the public and other agencies of how the coordination will
be accomplished.

I.  **PROJECT DESCRIPTION:**

> The proposed project is to provide a bypass around the historic
> downtown area of Helena (Shelby County) Alabama. The project will
> begin southwest of the downtown area on Shelby County Road 52 (CR-52)
> approximately 6,600 feet west of the existing intersection of CR-52
> and State Route 261 (SR-261) and traverse northeasterly approximately
> four miles to a terminus with SR-261 near Bearden Road. The total cost
> for the project is estimated to be \$22 Million.

II. **IMPACTS:**

    a.  **Human Environment:** Studies will commence in August 2006 and
        continue through August 2007.

        i.  Historic & Archaeological Preservation

> A Historical Building Survey and a Phase I Cultural Resource
> Assessment (CRA), and later, if needed, a Phase II CRA, will be
> conducted on all project alternatives in accordance with the
> requirements of the Alabama Historical Commission (AHC) and Section
> 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The Phase I surveys
> will be conducted by Southeastern Anthropological Institute under the
> supervision of Mr. Hunter Johnson. Coordination with AHC on the
> initial survey and Phase I CRA results is expected to occur between
> October-December 2006.
>
> Should a National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligible site be
> identified as impacted, ALDOT will promptly inform FHWA. FHWA, in
> turn, will notify the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
> by letter that they have a project which negatively impacts a NRHP
> eligible site. A Memorandum of Agreement and additional cultural
> resource documentation necessary will be accomplished, in accordance
> with AHC and Section 106. The MOA will be submitted to the ACHP by
> FHWA.
>
> Initial tribal coordination was accomplished by letters that were
> mailed on August 4, 2006 during the Scoping Phase of the project.
> ALDOT will provide additional information or details per any tribal
> request. Depending on tribal responses or the types of historic sites
> identified, additional coordination may occur. FHWA will handle any
> coordination beyond initial contact and providing supplementary data.
> If any issues or problems with tribal coordination arise, FHWA should
> be informed immediately.

ii. All other social impacts will be conducted in accordance with FHWA's
    Technical Advisory 6640.8A and ALDOT's policy.

    1.  Relocations

    2.  Environmental Justice. ALDOT will promptly inform FHWA if it
        appears environmental justice will be an issue.

    3.  Noise

    4.  Air Quality

    5.  Economic

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
b.  **NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL**: Studies will begin in August 2006 and
    continue through August 2007. Environmental impacts will be
    conducted in accordance with existing regulations and guidance of
    the various resource agencies. These studies will be performed by
    either Solid Civil Design or Gallet and Associates and include the
    following:

    i.  **Wetlands:** Wetlands will be delineated on all project
        alternatives in accordance with the Corps of Engineers
        guidelines. Permit requirements will be determined and
        commitments will be made during the NEPA process. A Wetlands
        Finding will be included in the FEIS.

    ii. **Water Quality:** Water quality will be assessed and
        coordinated with the Alabama Department of Environmental
        Management. Permit requirements will be determined and
        commitments will be made during the NEPA process.

    iii. **Floodplains:** A risk assessment will be performed in order
         to evaluate the potential for work below the 100 year flood.
         Coordination with FEMA will be accomplished and the necessary
         studies will be conducted prior to any construction activities.

    iv. **Endangered Species:** A survey will be conducted for all
        species noted by the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
        These surveys will be conducted by a well qualified and
        experienced individual that meets USFWS standards.

    v.  **Hazardous Materials:** A survey will be conducted to identify
        possible hazardous materials sites and to assess the associated
        risks. The survey will be coordinated with the ALDOT's
        Environmental Technical Section and Hazardous Materials Section.
        Drilling and clean-up cost estimates will be accomplished if
        needed, after a preferred alternate has been selected.

    vi. **Public Park, Recreation Area or Wildlife Refuge:** ALDOT will
        promptly inform FHWA if it appears that a Section 4(f) Resource
        will be impacted.

c.  **CULMULATIVE AND SECONDARY IMPACTS** will be identified and if
    appropriate, mitigation measures.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
III. **COORDINATION POINTS:**

> **NOTICE TO PROCEED**
>
> A Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued on June 8, 2006. Upon receiving
> this NTP, initial coordination efforts began.
>
> **NOTICE OF INTENT**
>
> In order to inform a broad spectrum of the Public, the FHWA has
> published a Notice of Intent (NOI) in the Federal Register. This NOI
> was published on August 1, 2006.
>
> **SCOPING MEETING**
>
> Pursuant to publishing the NOI, a Scoping Meeting was planned. The
> Scoping Meeting Invitation Letters along with a map of the study area
> were mailed on August 4, 2006 in order to provide sufficient time for
> attendees to schedule their attendance. The meeting was scheduled for
> September 7, 2006.
>
> Invitees for the Scoping Meeting were identified using ALDOT's list of
> invitees which included the local elected officials, regulatory
> agencies, and Native American contacts.
>
> Comments were solicited regarding the purpose and need for the
> project, the alternatives to be studied and on known or potential
> concerns needing to be addressed in the EIS. Comments were received at
> the scoping meeting and will be received for 30 days following the
> meeting.
>
> **PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MEETING**
>
> A Public Involvement Meeting (PIM) will be held in September 2006.
> Prior to this meeting, advertisements of the meeting will be published
> in both the Birmingham News and the Shelby County Reporter. In
> addition, ALDOT plans to mail invitations to citizens who registered
> their attendance at the PIM's held for adjacent projects. Comments
> will be requested via comment forms regarding the purpose and need for
> the project, the alternatives to be studied and on known or potential
> concerns needing to be addressed in the EIS. Participants will be able
> to provide their comments at the meeting or mail them in within 10
> days as provided in the ALDOT Public Involvement and Public Hearing
> Procedures.
>
> **PURPOSE AND NEED and RANGE OF ALTERNATIVES**
>
> After the comments from the Scoping Meeting and Public Involvement
> Meeting have been received and reviewed, a final statement of purpose
> and need and range of alternatives will be drafted by ALDOT for FHWA
> approval. This is scheduled for Oct 2006. A preferred alternative may
> be selected during preparation of the DEIS.
>
> **DEIS**
>
> Upon completion of the DEIS, copies will be distributed to Cooperating
> Agencies, Participating Agencies, and others who requested to be
> included in the distribution. A comment period of 45 days has been
> established. This comment period will be communicated to the
> recipients in the cover letter distributing the DEIS. The DEIS comment
> period begins on the date that EPA publishes the notice of
> availability of the DEIS in the *Federal Register*. This is scheduled
> for April 2007.
>
> **PUBLIC HEARING**
>
> A Corridor/Design Public Hearing will be held after approval of the
> DEIS. Prior to this meeting, advertisements of the meeting will be
> published in both the Birmingham News and the Shelby County Reporter.
> In addition, ALDOT plans to mail invitations to citizens who
> registered their attendance at the PIM. Comments will be requested via
> comment forms regarding the DEIS. Participants will be able to provide
> their comments at the meeting or mail them in within the 45 day
> comment period. This is scheduled for July 2007.
>
> **IDENTIFICATION OF THE SELECTED ALTERNATIVE**
>
> After the comments from the Public Hearing have been received and
> reviewed, an alternative will be selected and any additional studies
> or conceptual design required will be accomplished. This is scheduled
> for September 2007.
>
> **FEIS**
>
> Upon completion of the FEIS, copies will be distributed to Cooperating
> Agencies, Participating Agencies, and others who requested to be
> included in the distribution. A 30 day waiting period is provided
> between the FEIS notice in the Federal Register and the signing of the
> ROD. This period is required by CEQ regulations \[40 CFR 1506.10(b)\]
> provides time for other Federal agencies that find the project
> environmentally unsatisfactory to refer the decision to CEQ \[40 CFR
> 1504\]. The FEIS comment period begins on the date that EPA publishes
> the notice of availability of the FEIS in the Federal Register. This
> is scheduled for Jan 2008.
>
> Occasionally, the FHWA will seek comment on a specific unresolved
> issue discussed in the FEIS. In those cases, the comment deadline
> provisions of SAFETEA-LU apply and the comment period will run
> concurrently with the required 30-day waiting period. Even if the lead
> agencies do not request comments on a FEIS, they will address any new
> and substantive comments submitted during the 30 days following the
> FEIS publication.
>
> After the FEIS, comments typically should focus on commitments
> discussed in the FEIS and on conditions that parties want the lead
> agencies to include in the ROD. The process should avoid duplication,
> and the lead agencies are not required to re-address comments that
> present issues specifically raised during the DEIS comment period and
> addressed in the FEIS. Comments to which the lead agencies respond
> would be addressed in the ROD or in an attachment to the ROD.
>
> **ROD**
>
> SAFETEA-LU requires USDOT to report to Congress when project decisions
> by other Federal agencies are not completed within 180 days after the
> later of two statutory milestones. The first milestone is the
> completion of decision-making by the USDOT agency, for this project
> the FHWA, which occurs with the signing of the NEPA ROD. The second
> milestone is the date of submission of a complete application to the
> Federal agency for a permit, license, or approval for the project. The
> completeness of the application will be determined by the FHWA. This
> is scheduled for March 2008.
>
> **COMPLETION OF PERMITS, LICENSES, OR APPROVALS AFTER THE ROD**
>
> It is anticipated that the following permits, licenses and approvals
> will be required prior to construction. Because funding for
> construction has not been appropriated, an estimated construction
> start date has not been determined.
>
> National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from
> ADEM: This permit will be applied for by the ALDOT approximately one
> year prior to the construction start date.
>
> Section 404 Permit from the US COE: This permit will be applied for by
> the ALDOT approximately one year prior to the construction start date.
>
> No other permits, licenses or approvals are currently anticipated for
> this project.
>
> The FHWA Division Office, in cooperation with the City of Helena and
> ALDOT, are responsible for tracking these decision-making timelines as
> a part of their management of the project. The FHWA Division Office
> will address schedule problems as soon as they occur. If it appears
> likely that project decisions will not be completed by the 180-day
> deadlines, then the FHWA Division Office will comply with the
> requirements established by SAFETEA-LU, Section 6002, codified in
> Subchapter I of chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code.

IV. **Designated Groups**

> **LEAD AGENCIES:** The FHWA and ALDOT are joint leads for this
> project.
>
> **PARTICIPATING AGENCIES:** ALDOT will send invitations to potential
> participating agencies. FHWA will review and approve the invitations.
> The invitation should request a response either accepting or declining
> the role of participating agency. Per SAFETEA-LU, a Federal agency
> invited to participate shall be designated as a participating agency
> unless the agency declines the invitation by the specified deadline.
> If a Federal agency chooses to decline, their response letter must
> state that the agency (1) has no jurisdiction or authority with
> respect to the project, (2) has no expertise or information relevant
> to the project, and (3) does not intend to submit comments on the
> project. If the Federal agency's response does not state the agency's
> position in these terms, then the agency will be treated as
> participating agency.
>
> A State, tribal, or local agency must respond affirmatively to the
> invitation to be designated as a participating agency. If the State,
> tribal, or local agency fails to respond or declines the invitation,
> regardless of the reasons for declining, the agency will not be
> considered a participating agency.
>
> The project sponsor and the FHWA will be responsible for determining
> who will be invited as a participating agency. The following agencies
> have been identified as potential participating agencies:

i.  **County of Shelby,** Engineering

ii. **Alabama Historical Commission,** Cultural Resources

iii. **Alabama Department of Environmental Management,** Water Quality

iv. **U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,** Rare and Endangered Species
    and/or Critical Habitat

> Each participating agency will be asked to provide information and
> guidance for matters related to their area of special expertise. The
> invitations will be issued in September 2006.
>
> **COOPERATING AGENCIES:** Cooperating agencies have a slightly higher
> degree of authority, responsibility, and involvement in the
> environmental review process. Cooperating agencies are, by definition
> in [40 CFR
> 1508.5](http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/1508.htm#1508.5), agencies
> with jurisdiction by law or special expertise.
>
> The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is the only cooperating agency
> expected for this project.
>
> PROJECT SPONSOR: This is the City of Helena.
>
> PUBLIC: Anyone with an interest in the project. Opportunities for
> input occur at the PIM and the public hearing.
>
> HELENA BYPASS PROJECT SCHEDULE

![](media/image1.wmf)