Robert Lynn, MPA (<rlynn40@neo.rr.com>)

1^st^ Round of Tuesday, June 5^th^, Afternoon Breakout Session

The War on Terror: Objective Approaches to Risk Assessment and
Catastrophe Management

The following will discuss the breakout session titled the "War on
Terror: Objective

Approaches to Risk Assessment and Catastrophe Management". The presenter
for this

session was Ian S. Lustick, Ph.D. a professor at the University of
Pennsylvania in the

Political Science Department. The session was not a lecture on the "War
of Terror", but a debate and discussion based on Dr. Lustick's theory on
the "War on Terror".

Dr. Lustick started the discussion explaining his paper "The War on
Terror: When the Response is the Catastrophe". He stated it is
fundamentally inaccurate and dangerously misleading to think of the War
on Terror as a strategy adopted by the United States to defend itself
even though it is portrayed in this fashion. The War on Terror began its
planning stage well before the 911 attacks. Dr. Lustick stated a
powerful and well positioned group consisting of, but not limited to,
Bill Kristol, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz,
Don Rumsfeld, Elliot Abrams, and James Woolsey wanted to change American
foreign policy. Their objective would be to recast the post-Cold War
United States as a global "benevolent empire", organized to destroy the
world's "monsters". However, prior to the 911 attacks this group did not
have the support of the citizens of the United States to undertake such
a military task. The terrorist attack on the Unites States on September
11, 2001 provided the fuel to launch the agenda of the previously listed
group and the War on Terror began.

Dr. Lustick continued his discussion by stating terrorist groups like
Al-Qaeda have no interest in overthrowing the United States and only
attacked the United States in order to help further their cause.
Al-Qaeda attacked the United States in hopes of a counter attack and
invasion, so they could look like the saviors of the Arab world from the
barbaric United States. By the United States invading nations such as
Iraq who had no involvement with the 911 attacks, Al-Qaeda membership
would increase due to Arabs needing a group to protest against the
invasion. Dr. Lustick also stated it is apparent Al-Qaeda has no
interest in the United States due to not having another terrorist attack
on the U.S. since 911. This is not due to increased security measures
and the creation of a Homeland Security Department, but the abundance of
U.S. targets stationed in the Middle East.

According to Dr. Lustick, the war on terror was the response to the
catastrophe of the 911 attacks; however, the war itself has become a
greater catastrophe than the attack. The war on terror has caused a
greater financial hardship and loss of life than the 911 attacks. Also,
the United States has become alienated by other countries due to its war
on terror causing the loss of support and sympathy from the rest of the
world. The war on terror has also caused the priorities of the United
States to change in its disaster management and weakened FEMA's ability
to effectively manage disasters on American soil. By combining FEMA with
the office of Homeland Security, FEMA lost approximately 75% of its
direct funding and the majority of grant money for state and local
jurisdictions can only be used for terrorism efforts.

The war on terror began in Afghanistan and drove its way into Iraq who
had no part in the 911 attacks. The war on terror has the potential to
continue in Iran due to their devotion to develop nuclear weapons.
However, Dr. Lustick stated the development of nuclear weapons cannot be
stopped and it is inevitable Iran will get nuclear weapons because "you
can't bomb knowledge". He further stated he believes Pakistan is a
greater threat than Iran if they obtain nuclear weapons because they
have a less stable government and would not be able to control who had
access to the weapons.

The war on terror has generated to the point where it is the primary
focus on the United States Government and all other problems and
concerns of this country are barely being considered. Dr. Lustick stated
this is evident due to the increasing number of "potential terrorist
targets" in this country. In late 2003, 1849 targets were identified, in
2004 the number increased to 28,364, in 2005 it grew to 77,069, and an
estimated 300,000 in 2006. The increasing numbers will ensure continued
funding for the war on terror and it will continue to be an unnecessary
drain on the United States.

Dr. Lustick did offer some possible solutions to the war on terror. He
believes the U.S. has compromised real security due to the war on terror
and the response to any catastrophe should not hurt you more than the
act. By diminishing funding to FEMA and management to other disasters
other than terrorism, the United States caused a much larger catastrophe
than the terrorist act on 911. In order to "win" the war on terror the
U.S. must first know who the enemy is and how to fight them. In order to
fight the terrorists the U.S. must figure out what our enemy wants and
if the U.S. prevents it then the war on terror is won. The first problem
that must be solved to win the war on terror is solve the Israeli/Arab
conflict by having all involved talk about possible solutions and have
all nations involved with solving the conflict. The U.S. must also get
out of Iraq because our military action is causing people in the Arab
nations to join and support terrorists groups.

Dr. Lustik also stated the way the United States views terrorism must
change. Terrorist's acts should be viewed as another possible hazard
that must be mitigated against like other natural disasters. When a
terrorist act occurs, it should be treated like a criminal act and the
appropriate agencies should investigate and punish those involved. The
federal government should also offer every American "terrorism"
insurance, so if someone becomes a victim to terrorism they or their
families would be properly compensated. Homeland security should not be
a cabinet department and should only be one part of an "all hazards"
approach to hazard mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery.

Dr. Lustick concluded the discussion by stating further information on
this subject could be obtained by reading "Trapped in the War on Terror"
and "Fractured Fairy Tale: The Emperor's New Clothes and the War on
Terror". Information on these and other resources can be obtained via
the internet at:
[http://trappedinthewaronterror.com](http://trappedinthewaronterror.com/).