Standard

Contractor Performance Report

  ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------
  **Evaluation Type: Interim                            
  \_ Final \_ (*check one)***                           

  **Evaluating Organization:** **Reporting Period: From 
                               to**                     

  **Contracting Office:**      **Contract Number:**     **Order Number:**
  ---------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------

  ------------------------------------ ---------------- -----------------
  **Contractor Name:**                 **Contractor     
                                       Address:**       

  **DUNS:**                            **City:**        **State:**

  **Additional or Alternate Contractor **Zip/Postal     **Country:**
  Name:**                              Code:**          
  ------------------------------------ ---------------- -----------------

  ---------- ----------------------- -------------------- ----------------
  **TIN:**   **Industrial Code       **Commodity Code:**  **Contract
             (NAICS):**                                   Type:**

  ---------- ----------------------- -------------------- ----------------

  --------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------
  **Contract Award      **Contract Expiration        **Contract Value:**
  Date:**               Date:**                      

  --------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Requirement Description:**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Ratings**

**Summarize contractor performance and check the number which
corresponds to the rating for each rating category (*See attached Rating
Guidelines). ***

**Quality of Product or Service**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **\_0=Unsatisfactory \_1=Poor \_2=Fair \_3=Good \_4=Excellent
  \_5=Outstanding**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Government Comments for Quality of Product or Service (2000 characters
maximum):**

***Cost Control (Rating and Comments for Cost Control [are
not]{.underline}*** required if contract type is Fixed-Price)

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **\_0=Unsatisfactory \_1=Poor \_2=Fair \_3=Good \_4=Excellent
  \_5=Outstanding**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Government Comments for Cost Control (2000 characters maximum):**

**Timeliness of Performance**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **\_0=Unsatisfactory \_1=Poor \_2=Fair \_3=Good \_4=Excellent
  \_5=Outstanding**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Government Comments for Timeliness of Performance (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Business Relations**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **\_0=Unsatisfactory \_1=Poor \_2=Fair \_3=Good \_4=Excellent
  \_5=Outstanding**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Government Comments for Business Relations (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Additional Info**

**Subcontracts**

**Are subcontracts involved? ­\_\_Yes \_\_No (*Check one)***

**Government Comment on subcontracts (2000 characters maximum):**

**Contractor Key Personnel**

**Contractor Manager/Principal Investigator (*name): ***

**Government Comment on Contractor Manager/Principal Investigator (2000
characters maximum):**

**Contractor Key Person (*name):***

**Government Comment on Contractor Key Person (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Contractor Key Person (*name):***

**Government Comment on Contractor Key Person (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Small Business Subcontracting Plan**

**Did the contractor make a good faith effort to comply with its
subcontracting plan consistent with the goals and objectives, reporting
and other aspects of the plan? \_Yes \_No \_N/A (*Check one)\
***

**If this is a bundled contract, did the contractor meet the goals and
objectives for small business participation?**

**\_Yes \_No \_N/A (*Check one)***

**Government Comments on Small Business Subcontracting Plan (2000
characters maximum):**

**Small Disadvantaged Business Goals**

**Did the contractor make a good faith effort to comply with its
subcontracting plan consistent with the goals and objectives, for small
disadvantaged business (SDB) participation, monetary targets for SDB
participation, and required notifications? \_Yes \_No \_N/A (*Check
one)***

**Government Comments on Small Disadvantaged Business Goals (2000
characters maximum):**

**Customer Satisfaction**

**Is/was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? \_Yes \_No
(*Check one)***

**Would you recommend the selection of this firm again? \_Yes \_No
(*Check one) -- FINAL REPORT ONLY***

**Government Comments on Customer Satisfaction (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Admin Info**

**Project Officer/COTR**

**Name:**

**Phone:**

**Fax:**

**E-mail Address:**

**Contractor Representative**

**Name:**

**Phone:**

**Fax:**

**E-mail Address:**

**Alternate Contractor Representative (*Required to insure that at least
one person is notified of evaluation)***

**Name:**

**Phone:**

**Fax:**

**E-mail Address:**

**Contracting Officer:**

**Name:**

**Phone:**

**Fax:**

**E-mail Address:**

**Contractor Comments**

**Quality of Product of Service**

**\_\_\_Contractor has elected not to comment**

**Contractor Comments for Quality of Product of Service (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Cost Control**

**\_\_\_Contractor has elected not to comment**

**Contractor Comments for Quality of Product of Service (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Timeliness of Performance**

**\_\_\_Contractor has elected not to comment**

**Contractor Comments for Timeliness of Performance (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Business Relations**

**\_\_\_Contractor has elected not to comment**

**Contractor Comments for Business Relations (2000 characters
maximum):**

**Overall Comment**

**\_\_\_Contractor has elected not to comment**

**Contractor Comments for Quality of Product of Service (2000 characters
maximum):**

**[Rating Guidelines]{.underline}**

**[Quality of Product or Service]{.underline}**

0 = Unsatisfactory 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent 5 =
Outstanding

  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
  Unsatisfactory   Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract
                   requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not
                   likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it
                   constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for
                   future awards containing similar requirements.

  Poor             Overall compliance requires significant Agency resources to
                   ensure achievement of contract requirements.

  Fair             Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure
                   achievement of contract requirements.

  Good             There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the
                   Contractor has met the contract requirements.

  Excellent        There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has
                   substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements
                   without commensurate additional costs to the Government.

  Outstanding      The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
                   level that was significantly in excess of anticipated
                   achievements and is commendable as an example for others, so
                   that it justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected
                   that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances
                   where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance
                   levels described as \"Excellent\".
  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

**[Cost Control]{.underline}**

0 = Unsatisfactory 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent 5 =
Outstanding

  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
  Unsatisfactory   Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of
                   contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources.
                   Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially
                   corrected, this level of ability to manage cost issues
                   constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for
                   future awards.

  Poor             Ability to manage cost issues requires significant Agency
                   resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

  Fair             Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources
                   to ensure achievement of contract requirements.

  Good             There are no, or very minimal, cost management issues and the
                   Contractor has met the contract requirements.

  Excellent        There are no cost management issues and the Contractor has
                   exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to
                   the Government.

  Outstanding      The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
                   level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is
                   expected that this rating will be used in those rare
                   circumstances where the contractor achieved cost savings and
                   performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described
                   as \"Excellent\".
  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

**[\
]{.underline}**

**[Timeliness of Performance]{.underline}**

0 = Unsatisfactory 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent 5 =
Outstanding

  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
  Unsatisfactory   Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract
                   requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not
                   likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it
                   constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for
                   future awards.

  Poor             Delays require significant Agency resources to ensure
                   achievement of contract requirements.

  Fair             Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of
                   contract requirements.

  Good             There are no, or minimal, delays that impact achievement of
                   contract requirements.

  Excellent        There are no delays and the contractor has exceeded the agreed
                   upon time schedule.

  Outstanding      The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
                   level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is
                   expected that this rating will be used in those rare
                   circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
                   performance levels described as \"Excellent\".
  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------

 

**[Business Relations]{.underline}**

0 = Unsatisfactory 1 = Poor 2 = Fair 3 = Good 4 = Excellent 5 =
Outstanding

  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------
  Unsatisfactory   Response to inquiries and/or technical, service,
                   administrative issues is not effective. If not substantially
                   mitigated or corrected it should constitute a significant
                   impediment in considerations for future awards.

  Poor             Response to inquiries and/or technical, service,
                   administrative issues is marginally effective.

  Fair             Response to inquiries and/or technical, service,
                   administrative issues is somewhat effective.

  Good             Response to inquiries and/or technical, service,
                   administrative issues is consistently effective.

  Excellent        Response to inquiries and/or technical, service,
                   administrative issues exceeds Government expectation.

  Outstanding      The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance
                   level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is
                   expected that this rating will be used in those rare
                   circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the
                   performance levels described as \"Excellent\".
  ---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------