**FAAXX704: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All
  Capital Assets)**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **I.A. Overview**                   

                                      

  **1. Date of Submission:**          9/1/2006

  **2. Agency:**                      Department of Transportation

  **3. Bureau:**                      Federal Aviation Administration

  **4. Name of this Capital Asset:**  FAAXX704: Automatic Dependent
                                      Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)

  **5. Unique Project (Investment)    021-12-01-20-01-1230-00
  Identifier: (For IT investment      
  only, see section 53. For all       
  other, use agency ID system.)**     

  **6. What kind of investment will   Mixed Life Cycle
  this be in FY2008? (Please NOTE:    
  Investments moving to O&M ONLY in   
  FY2008, with Planning/Acquisition   
  activities prior to FY2008 should   
  not select O&M. These investments   
  should indicate their current       
  status.)**                          

  **7. What was the first budget year FY2007
  this investment was submitted to    
  OMB?**                              

  **8. Provide a brief summary and    
  justification for this investment,  
  including a brief description of    
  how this closes in part or in whole 
  an identified agency performance    
  gap:**                              

  The Surveillance and Broadcast      
  Services (SBS) program office is    
  responsible for the Automatic       
  Dependent Surveillance Broadcast    
  (ADS-B) NAS-wide implementation.    
  With constantly increasing air      
  travel, the FAA recognizes the need 
  for well-planned and well-managed   
  air traffic solutions to continue   
  to provide the safest and most      
  efficient air traffic services in   
  the world into the future. With the 
  SBS program we can deliver          
  integrated services, more scalable  
  and cost-effective than existing    
  systems, with improved capacity,    
  efficiency, and safety. The SBS     
  program meets a large performance   
  gap in the capability of pilots to  
  receive situational awareness       
  information, thus providing for     
  safety in ways legacy systems       
  cannot by delivering services       
  through cockpit avionics: 1)        
  Airport surface maps along with     
  traffic information. These maps     
  improve situational awareness to    
  minimize the likelihood of runway   
  incursions. 2) Enhanced             
  see-and-avoid capabilities which    
  will assist pilots in preventing    
  mid-air collisions. 3) Air traffic  
  control (ATC) services in non-radar 
  airspace. 4) Weather information,   
  helping to reduce incidences of     
  onboard injuries caused by          
  turbulence. SBS Segment #1,         
  FY07-FY11, will establish a         
  performance-based acquisition       
  (contract award scheduled for July  
  2007) capable of fully implementing 
  the first step in the SBS plan:     
  building the national ground        
  infrastructure to support future    
  surveillance and broadcast          
  services, In Segment 1, the SBS     
  program office will also develop    
  and manage a rulemaking project     
  request, and begin developing a     
  notice of proposed rulemaking       
  (NPRM) as part of the process to    
  propose universal broadcast         
  services avionics equipment in      
  aircraft. The final architecture    
  will be used as the cost basis in   
  the Segment #2 business case for    
  the National Airspace System-wide   
  broadcast services deployment. We   
  will maintain the prototype test    
  bed through FY08 and the broadcast  
  services capability will be         
  expanded across parts of the NAS,   
  with operational status planned for 
  FY08. The SBS program office will   
  also develop interfaces with four   
  unique FAA automation platforms     
  (MEARTS, HOST, STARS, CARTS) to     
  support an In Service Decision. A   
  Joint Resources Council is          
  scheduled for Feb. 2007 covering    
  Segment 2, FY09-FY13, which will    
  include NAS-wide deployment and the 
  remaining three automation          
  platforms that serve the NAS. By    
  FY2008 the SBS program will be in   
  the Control and Evaluate CPIC       
  Phases.                             

  **9. Did the Agency\'s              Yes
  Executive/Investment Committee      
  approve this request?**             

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what was the    6/7/2006
  date of this approval?**            

  **10. Did the Project Manager       Yes
  review this Exhibit?**              

  **11. Contact information of        
  Project Manager?**                  

  **Name**                            

                                      

  **Phone Number**                    

  **Email**                           

  **12. Has the agency developed      Yes
  and/or promoted cost effective,     
  energy efficient and                
  environmentally sustainable         
  techniques or practices for this    
  project.**                          

  **   a. Will this investment        Yes
  include electronic assets           
  (including computers)?**            

  **   b. Is this investment for new  No
  construction or major retrofit of a 
  Federal building or facility?       
  (answer applicable to non-IT assets 
  only)**                             

  **      1. If \"yes,\" is an ESPC   
  or UESC being used to help fund     
  this investment?**                  

  **      2. If \"yes,\" will this    
  investment meet sustainable design  
  principles?**                       

  **      3. If \"yes,\" is it         
  designed to be 30% more energy      
  efficient than relevant code?**     

  **13. Does this investment support  No
  one of the PMA initiatives?**       

  **   If \"yes,\" check all that     
  apply:**                            

  **   13a. Briefly describe how this  
  asset directly supports the         
  identified initiative(s)?**         

  **14. Does this investment support  Yes
  a program assessed using the        
  Program Assessment Rating Tool      
  (PART)? (For more information about 
  the PART, visit                     
  www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)**     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does this       Yes
  investment address a weakness found 
  during the PART review?**           

  **   b. If \"yes,\" what is the     FAA Air Traffic Services
  name of the PART program assessed   
  by OMB\'s Program Assessment Rating 
  Tool?**                             

  **   c. If \"yes,\" what PART       Adequate
  rating did it receive?**            

  **15. Is this investment for        Yes
  information technology?**           

  **If the answer to Question: \"Is   
  this investment for information     
  technology?\" was \"Yes,\" complete 
  this sub-section. If the answer is  
  \"No,\" do not answer this          
  sub-section.**                      

  **For information technology        
  investments only:**                 

  **16. What is the level of the IT   Level 3
  Project? (per CIO Council PM        
  Guidance)**                         

  **17. What project management       \(1\) Project manager has been
  qualifications does the Project     validated as qualified for this
  Manager have? (per CIO Council PM   investment
  Guidance):**                        

  **18. Is this investment identified No
  as \"high risk\" on the Q4 - FY     
  2006 agency high risk report (per   
  OMB\'s \"high risk\" memo)?**       

  **19. Is this a financial           No
  management system?**                

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does this       
  investment address a FFMIA          
  compliance area?**                  

  **      1. If \"yes,\" which         
  compliance area:**                  

  **      2. If \"no,\" what does it   
  address?**                          

  **   b. If \"yes,\" please identify 
  the system name(s) and system       
  acronym(s) as reported in the most  
  recent financial systems inventory  
  update required by Circular A-11    
  section 52**                        

                                      

  **20. What is the percentage        
  breakout for the total FY2008       
  funding request for the following?  
  (This should total 100%)**          

  **Hardware**                        5.000000

  **Software**                        15.000000

  **Services**                        60.000000

  **Other**                           20.000000

  **21. If this project produces      Yes
  information dissemination products  
  for the public, are these products  
  published to the Internet in        
  conformance with OMB Memorandum     
  05-04 and included in your agency   
  inventory, schedules and            
  priorities?**                       

  **22. Contact information of        
  individual responsible for privacy  
  related questions:**                

  **Name**                            

                                      

  **Phone Number**                    

  **Title**                           

  **E-mail**                          

  **23. Are the records produced by   Yes
  this investment appropriately       
  scheduled with the National         
  Archives and Records                
  Administration\'s approval?**       
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.B. Summary of Funding**                                           

                                                                        

  **Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by  
  completing the following table. All amounts represent budget          
  authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places.       
  Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated 
  \"Government FTE Cost,\" and should be excluded from the amounts      
  shown for \"Planning,\" \"Full Acquisition,\" and                     
  \"Operation/Maintenance.\" The total estimated annual cost of the     
  investment is the sum of costs for \"Planning,\" \"Full               
  Acquisition,\" and \"Operation/Maintenance.\" For Federal buildings   
  and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy,     
  environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs   
  associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be     
  included in this report.**                                            

  **Table 1: SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT PHASES\                    
  (REPORTED IN MILLIONS)\                                               
  (Estimates for BY+1 and beyond are for planning purposes only and do  
  not represent budget decisions)**                                     
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- -----------
                   **PY - 1\   **PY     **CY     **BY     **BY + 1 **BY + 2 **BY + 3 **BY + 4\  **Total**
                   and\        2006**   2007**   2008**   2009**   2010**   2011**   and\       
                   Earlier**                                                         Beyond**   

  Planning                                                                                      

      Budgetary    0           9.9      4.27     0        0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Acquisition                                                                                   

      Budgetary    0           0        76.227   86.091   0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Subtotal                                                                                      
  Planning &                                                                                    
  Acquisition                                                                                   

      Budgetary    0           9.9      80.497   86.091   0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Operations &                                                                                  
  Maintenance                                                                                   

      Budgetary    0           0        0        0.15     0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  TOTAL                                                                                         

      Budgetary    0           9.9      80.497   86.241   0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Government FTE                                                                                
  Costs                                                                                         

    Budgetary      0           0.489    1.329    1.741    0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Number of FTE    0           4        10.63    12.301   0        0        0        0          0
  represented by                                                                                
  Costs:                                                                                        
  ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- -----------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **Note: For the cross-agency        
  investments, this table should      
  include all funding (both managing  
  partner and partner agencies).      
  Government FTE Costs should not be  
  included as part of the TOTAL       
  represented.**                      

                                      

  **2. Will this project require the  Yes
  agency to hire additional FTE\'s?** 

  **   a. If \"yes,\" How many and in 6FTEs in FY2007, 6 FTEs in FY2009,
  what year?**                        and 1 FTE in 2011.

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **I.C. Acquisition/Contract         
  Strategy**                          

                                      

  **2. If earned value is not         
  required or will not be a contract  
  requirement for any of the          
  contracts or task orders above,     
  explain why:**                      

  The achievement of cost, schedule,  
  and performance goals will be       
  tracked and monitored through FAA   
  best practices and established EVM  
  processes defined by the FAA.       
  Monthly program reviews, detailed   
  schedule and EVM reporting will be  
  applied in accordance with the FAA  
  EVM Policy. Future contract(s) will 
  include all EVM requirements        
  established by the FAA and will be  
  compliant with ANSI-EIA-748A        
  standards, the NDIA Intent Guide,   
  and the OMB A-11 guidance. Monthly  
  program reviews, detailed schedule  
  and EVM reporting will be included  
  in all new contracts that are       
  awarded as a part of this           
  acquisition. Control account        
  managers from both the FAA and the  
  contractors will have               
  responsibility for ensuring that    
  the EVM plan, processes, and        
  procedures are followed. Monthly    
  Control Account Manager Reviews     
  with the program management team    
  will be conducted to ensure that    
  the program is monitoring program   
  performance measures and using all  
  tools necessary to make the         
  appropriate decisions with regards  
  to technical scope, cost and        
  schedule to allow the program to    
  remain on track for program         
  execution in accordance with its    
  approved baselines. For contracts   
  that don\'t include a requirement   
  to provide EVM; the program office  
  will receive reports, required by   
  those contracts, on actual costs,   
  schedules and management metrics by 
  charge number and work package. The 
  program office will collect the     
  data and enter it into their EVMS   
  database for reporting purposes,    
  according to FAA standards. The     
  program office intends to make use  
  of a performance based              
  specification and acquisition to    
  implement SBS. Surveillance will be 
  defined as critical level service   
  and will be bid to vendors to       
  deploy in defined areas of coverage 
  based on specifications that        
  require levels of service rather    
  than specific system design.        
  Broadcast Services will be bid as   
  separate specifications and will be 
  defined as essential services.      
  Contracts will be competed in full  
  and open competition and will be    
  awarded in accordance with the FAA  
  Acquisition Management System. The  
  acquisition could involve multiple  
  contract awards to maximize         
  competition. By foregoing a         
  traditional acquisition, where the  
  FAA owns and maintains systems, it  
  is believed costs can be reduced    
  and vendors will be provided with   
  the opportunity to develop          
  innovative and transformational     
  solutions. While the contract has   
  yet to be awarded, a firm fixed     
  price contract will be among the    
  available options for contract      
  award.                              

  **3. Do the contracts ensure        Yes
  Section 508 compliance?**           

  **   a. Explain why:**              The air traffic controllers must
                                      meet strict medical qualifications
                                      under OPM Qualification Standards,
                                      GS-2152, Air Traffic Control
                                      Series, as stated in FAA Order
                                      3930.3A, Air Traffic Control
                                      Specialist Health Program. The
                                      GS-2152 require controllers to meet
                                      strict qualifications with respect
                                      to vision, hearing and other
                                      physical abilities that preclude
                                      the need for application of the 508
                                      standards described at 1194 for
                                      this equipment.

  **4. Is there an acquisition plan   Yes
  which has been approved in          
  accordance with agency              
  requirements?**                     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     6/7/2006
  date?**                             

  **   b. If \"no,\" will an           
  acquisition plan be developed?**    

  **      1. If \"no,\" briefly        
  explain why:**                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.D. Performance Information**                                      

                                                                        

  **In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300,      
  performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to    
  the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the          
  agency\'s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures must  
  be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency\'s      
  strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill.   
  They are the internal and external performance benefits this          
  investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve        
  efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300       
  percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 
  percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable       
  investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do   
  not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or         
  investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved  
  that do not have a quantitative or qualitative measure.**             

  **Agencies must use Table 1 below for reporting performance goals and 
  measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments   
  that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table can be extended to    
  include measures for years beyond FY 2006.**                          

                                                                        

  **Performance Information Table 1:**                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- ------------- --------------- ------------------- ------------- ---------------
  **Fiscal   **Strategic   **Performance   **Actual/baseline   **Planned     **Performance
  Year**     Goal(s)       Measure**       (from Previous      Performance   Metric Results
             Supported**                   Year)**             Metric        (Actual)**
                                                               (Target)**    

  ---------- ------------- --------------- ------------------- ------------- ---------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
                                                                        

  **All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must use    
  Table 2 and are required to use the Federal Enterprise Architecture   
  (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please use Table 2 and the   
  PRM to identify the performance information pertaining to this major  
  IT investment. Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding    
  \"Measurement Area\" and \"Measurement Grouping\" identified in the   
  PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for at least  
  four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is   
  available at www.egov.gov.**                                          

  **Performance Information Table 2:**                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- -----------
  **Fiscal   **Measurement   **Measurement    **Measurement    **Measurement      **Baseline**      **Planned         **Actual
  Year**     Area**          Category**       Grouping**       Indicator**                          Improvement to    Results**
                                                                                                    the Baseline**    

  2006       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Develop and        Develop and       Percent           06/2007
             Results                          or Burden        Validate           Validate          Improvement being 
                                                               performance        Baseline.         developed.        
                                                               baseline and       Starting BY07     Starting BY07     
                                                               metrics for                                            
                                                               Segment 1                                              

  2006       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Develop and        Develop and       Percent           06/2007
             Business                         Transportation   Validate           Validate          Improvement being 
             Results                                           performance        Baseline.         developed.        
                                                               baseline and       Starting BY07     Starting BY07     
                                                               metrics for                                            
                                                               Segment 1                                              

  2006       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Develop and        Develop and       Percent           06/2007
             Activities      Efficiency                        Validate           Validate          Improvement being 
                                                               performance        Baseline.         developed.        
                                                               baseline and       Starting BY07     Starting BY07     
                                                               metrics for                                            
                                                               Segment 1                                              

  2006       Technology      Efficiency       Accessibility    Develop and        Develop and       Percent           06/2007
                                                               Validate           Validate          Improvement being 
                                                               performance        Baseline.         developed.        
                                                               baseline and       Starting BY07     Starting BY07     
                                                               metrics for                                            
                                                               Segment 1                                              

  2006       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Develop and        Develop and       Percent           06/2007
                             Data             and Quality      Validate           Validate          Improvement being 
                                                               performance        Baseline.         developed.        
                                                               baseline and       Starting BY07     Starting BY07     
                                                               metrics for                                            
                                                               Segment 1                                              

  2006       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Develop and        Develop and       Percent           06/2007
                             Availability                      Validate           Validate          Improvement being 
                                                               performance        Baseline.         developed.        
                                                               baseline and       Starting BY07     Starting BY07     
                                                               metrics for                                            
                                                               Segment 1                                              

  2007       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Minimal           6/2009
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$616M based on   improvement       because of
                                                               Services:          prototype system  because of little lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight  coverage to be    equipage (+/-     data
                                                               into Terrain       replaced by       tolerance band    
                                                               Accident Costs     National System   that converges on 
                                                               from fatalities,   Coverage in FY09. measure over      
                                                               injuries, and                        time)             
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2007       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Minimal           6/2009
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$315.5M based on improvement       because of
                                                               Services:          prototype system  because of little lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related    coverage to be    equipage (+/-     data
                                                               Accident Costs     replaced by       tolerance band    
                                                               from fatalities,   National System   that converges on 
                                                               injuries, and      Coverage in FY09. measure over      
                                                               aircraft damage                      time)             
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2007       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Minimal           6/2009
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$72.7M based on  improvement       because of
                                                               Services: Mid-Air  prototype system  because of little lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Accident coverage to be    equipage (+/-     data
                                                               Costs from         replaced by       tolerance band    
                                                               fatalities,        National System   that converges on 
                                                               injuries, and      Coverage in FY09. measure over      
                                                               aircraft damage                      time)             
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2007       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       2.7X10\^-16       71% reduction in   6/2009
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          mid-air           mid-air collision because of
             Results                                           Services: Mid-Air  collisions per    rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Rate for operation         equipped with UAT Data
                                                               equipped UAT fleet 1989-2003, based  multi-function    
                                                                                  on prototype      display in        
                                                                                  system coverage   coverage area     
                                                                                  to be replaced by when TIS-B        
                                                                                  National System   service available 
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. (+/- tolerance    
                                                                                                    band that         
                                                                                                    converges on      
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time) Actual      
                                                                                                    totals to show    
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2007       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       5.7               26% reduction in  6/2009
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          Weather-related   Weather-related   because of
             Results                                           Services:          accidents per     accident rate for lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related    million           GA fleet equipped data
                                                               Accident Rate for  operations in     with UAT          
                                                               equipped UAT       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               equipped GA fleet  1989-2003, based  display in        
                                                                                  on prototype      coverage area     
                                                                                  system coverage   when FIS-B        
                                                                                  to be replaced by service available 
                                                                                  National System   (+/- tolerance    
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. band that         
                                                                                                    converges on      
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time) Actual      
                                                                                                    totals to show    
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2007       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD â€" 9/07 See  TBD â€"           1/2008
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire         and avoid         TIS-B/ADS-B (+/-  
                                                               proximate traffic                    tolerance band    
                                                               information.                         that converges on 
                                                               Technical                            measure over      
                                                               Performance                          time)             
                                                               Measures modeling                                      
                                                               results for                                            
                                                               2007/2008 will                                         
                                                               further define                                         
                                                               additional TPMs                                        
                                                               for future years.                                      

  2007       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD-9/07 average  TBD â€" access    1/2008
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire weather time of data      FIS-B (+/-        
                                                               information.       through current   tolerance band    
                                                               Technical          process           that converges on 
                                                               Performance                          measure over      
                                                               Measures modeling                    time)             
                                                               results for                                            
                                                               2007/2008 will                                         
                                                               further define                                         
                                                               additional TPMs                                        
                                                               for future years.                                      

  2007       Technology      Efficiency       Accessibility    Expansion of       Coverage area     Coverage area     1/2008
                                                               Broadcast          contains 22% of   contains 24% of   
                                                               Services: Percent  NAS-wide GA       NAS-wide GA       
                                                               of GA NAS-wide     Operations, based Operations (+/-   
                                                               operations inside  on prototype      tolerance band    
                                                               FIS-B and TIS-B    system coverage   that converges on 
                                                               coverage areas     to be replaced by measure over      
                                                                                  National System   time)             
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09.                   

  2007       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission,  FIS-B latency \<  1/2008
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          based on          10 sec per        
                                                               Services: FIS-B    prototype system  message (Time     
                                                               latency            coverage to be    from receipt of   
                                                                                  replaced by       external data to  
                                                                                  National System   message           
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. transmission)     
                                                                                                    (+/- tolerance    
                                                                                                    band that         
                                                                                                    converges on      
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2007       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission,  TIS-B latency \<= 1/2008
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          based on          6.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: TIS-B    prototype system  measurement of    
                                                               latency            coverage to be    source position   
                                                                                  replaced by       data to aircraft  
                                                                                  National System   display) (+/-     
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. tolerance band    
                                                                                                    that converges on 
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2007       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No ADS-R, based   ADS-R latency \<= 1/2008
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          on prototype      3.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: ADS-R    system coverage   ADS-R message     
                                                               latency            to be replaced by applicability     
                                                                                  National System   until display on  
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. aircraft) (+/-    
                                                                                                    tolerance band    
                                                                                                    that converges on 
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2007       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No ADS-B, based   End-to-end ADS-B  1/2008
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          on prototype      surveillance      
                                                               Services: ADS-B    system coverage   latency \<= 2.7   
                                                               latency            to be replaced by seconds for       
                                                                                  National System   terminal          
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. operations,       
                                                                                                    \<=3.3 seconds    
                                                                                                    for en route      
                                                                                                    operations. (+/-  
                                                                                                    tolerance band    
                                                                                                    that converges on 
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2007       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       Does not exist,   FIS-B service     1/2008
                             Availability                      Broadcast          based on          availability \>=  
                                                               Services: Percent  prototype system  99.9% (+/-        
                                                               of FIS-B service   coverage to be    tolerance band    
                                                               availability       replaced by       that converges on 
                                                                                  National System   measure over      
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. time)             

  2007       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No TIS-B          TIS-B service     1/2008
                             Availability                      Broadcast          Availability,     availability \>=  
                                                               Services: Percent  based on          99.9% (+/-        
                                                               of TIS-B service   prototype system  tolerance band    
                                                               availability       coverage to be    that converges on 
                                                                                  replaced by       measure over      
                                                                                  National System   time)             

  2007       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No ADS-R, based   ADS-R service     1/2008
                             Availability                      Broadcast          on prototype      availability \>=  
                                                               Services: ADS-R    system coverage   99.9% (+/-        
                                                               service            to be replaced by tolerance band    
                                                               availability       National System   that converges on 
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2010
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$625M based on   costs because of  because of
                                                               Services:          prototype system  equipped aircraft lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight  coverage to be    of \$372K (+/-    data
                                                               into Terrain       replaced by       tolerance band    
                                                               Accident Costs     National System   that converges on 
                                                               from fatalities,   Coverage in FY09. measure over      
                                                               injuries, and                        time)             
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2010
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$320M based on   yearly cost       because of
                                                               Services:          prototype system  because of        lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related    coverage to be    equipped aircraft data
                                                               Accident Costs     replaced by       of \$204K (+/-    
                                                               from fatalities,   National System   tolerance band    
                                                               injuries, and      Coverage in FY09. that converges on 
                                                               aircraft damage                      measure over      
                                                               for UAT equipped                     time)             
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2010
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$74M based on    yearly cost       because of
                                                               Services: Mid-Air  prototype system  because of        lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Accident coverage to be    UAT-equipped      data
                                                               Costs from         replaced by       aircraft of       
                                                               fatalities,        National System   \$1800 (+/-       
                                                               injuries, and      Coverage in FY09. tolerance band    
                                                               aircraft damage                      that converges on 
                                                               for UAT equipped                     measure over      
                                                               GA fleet                             time)             

  2008       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       7.3 CFIT          17% reduction in  6/2010
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          accidents per     CFIT accident     because of
             Results                                           Services:          million           rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight  operations in     equipped with UAT data
                                                               into Terrain       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               Accident Rate for  1989-2003, based  display (+/-      
                                                               UAT equipped GA    on prototype      tolerance band    
                                                               fleet              system coverage   that converges on 
                                                                                  to be replaced by measure over      
                                                                                  National System   time)             
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09.                   

  2008       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       2.7X10\^-16       71% reduction in  6/2010
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          mid-air           mid-air collision because of
             Results                                           Services: Mid-Air  collisions per    rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Rate for operation         equipped with UAT data
                                                               equipped UAT fleet 1989-2003, based  multi-function    
                                                                                  on prototype      display in        
                                                                                  system coverage   coverage area     
                                                                                  to be replaced by when TIS-B        
                                                                                  National System   service available 
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. (+/- tolerance    
                                                                                                    band that         
                                                                                                    converges on      
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time) Actual      
                                                                                                    totals to show    
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2008       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       5.7               26% reduction in  6/2010
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          Weather-related   Weather-related   because of
             Results                                           Services:          accidents per     accident rate for lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related    million           GA fleet equipped data
                                                               Accident Rate for  operations in     with UAT          
                                                               equipped UAT       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               equipped GA fleet  1989-2003, based  display in        
                                                                                  on prototype      coverage area     
                                                                                  system coverage   when FIS-B        
                                                                                  to be replaced by service available 
                                                                                  National System   (+/- tolerance    
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. band that         
                                                                                                    converges on      
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time) Actual      
                                                                                                    totals to show    
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2008       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD â€" 9/07 See  TBD â€"           1/2009
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire         and avoid         TIS-B/ADS-B (+/-  
                                                               proximate traffic                    tolerance band    
                                                               information.                         that converges on 
                                                               Technical                            measure over      
                                                               Performance                          time)             
                                                               Measures modeling                                      
                                                               results for                                            
                                                               2007/2008 will                                         
                                                               further define                                         
                                                               additional TPMs                                        
                                                               for future years.                                      

  2008       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD-9/07 average  TBD â€" access    1/2009
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire weather time of data      FIS-B (+/-        
                                                               information.       through current   tolerance band    
                                                               Technical          process           that converges on 
                                                               Performance                          measure over      
                                                               Measures modeling                    time)             
                                                               results for                                            
                                                               2007/2008 will                                         
                                                               further define                                         
                                                               additional TPMs                                        
                                                               for future years.                                      

  2008       Technology      Efficiency       Accessibility    Expansion of       Coverage area     Coverage area     1/2009
                                                               Broadcast          contains 22% of   contains 24% of   
                                                               Services: Percent  NAS-wide GA       NAS-wide GA       
                                                               of GA NAS-wide     Operations, based Operations (+/-   
                                                               operations inside  on prototype      tolerance band    
                                                               FIS-B and TIS-B    system coverage   that converges on 
                                                               coverage areas     to be replaced by measure over      
                                                                                  National System   time)             
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09.                   

  2008       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission,  FIS-B latency \<  1/2009
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          based on          10 sec per        
                                                               Services: FIS-B    prototype system  message (Time     
                                                               latency            coverage to be    from receipt of   
                                                                                  replaced by       external data to  
                                                                                  National System   message           
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. transmission)     
                                                                                                    (+/- tolerance    
                                                                                                    band that         
                                                                                                    converges on      
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2008       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission,  TIS-B latency \<= 1/2009
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          based on          6.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: TIS-B    prototype system  measurement of    
                                                               latency            coverage to be    source position   
                                                                                  replaced by       data to aircraft  
                                                                                  National System   display) (+/-     
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. tolerance band    
                                                                                                    that converges on 
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2008       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No ASD-R, based   ADS-R latency \<= 1/2009
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          on prototype      3.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: ADS-R    system coverage   ADS-R message     
                                                               latency            to be replaced by applicability     
                                                                                  National System   until display on  
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. aircraft) (+/-    
                                                                                                    tolerance band    
                                                                                                    that converges on 
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2008       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No ADS-B, based   End-to-end ADS-B  1/2009
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast          on prototype      surveillance      
                                                               Services: ADS-B    system coverage   latency \<= 2.7   
                                                               latency            to be replaced by seconds for       
                                                                                  National System   terminal          
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. operations,       
                                                                                                    \<=3.3 seconds    
                                                                                                    for en route      
                                                                                                    operations. (+/-  
                                                                                                    tolerance band    
                                                                                                    that converges on 
                                                                                                    measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2008       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       Does not exist,   FIS-B service     1/2009
                             Availability                      Broadcast          based on          availability \>=  
                                                               Services: Percent  prototype system  99.9% (+/-        
                                                               of FIS-B service   coverage to be    tolerance band    
                                                               availability       replaced by       that converges on 
                                                                                  National System   measure over      
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. time)             

  2008       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No TIS-B          TIS-B service     1/2009
                             Availability                      Broadcast          Availability,     availability \>=  
                                                               Services: Percent  based on          99.9% (+/-        
                                                               of TIS-B service   prototype system  tolerance band    
                                                               availability       coverage to be    that converges on 
                                                                                  replaced by       measure over      
                                                                                  National System   time)             
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09.                   

  2008       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No ADS-R, based   ADS-R service     1/2009
                             Availability                      Broadcast          on prototype      availability \>=  
                                                               Services: ADS-R    system coverage   99.9% (+/-        
                                                               service            to be replaced by tolerance band    
                                                               availability       National System   that converges on 
                                                                                  Coverage in FY09. measure over      
                                                                                                    time)             

  2009       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2011
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$633M            costs because of  because of
                                                               Services:                            equipped aircraft lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight                    of \$688K         data
                                                               into Terrain                                           
                                                               Accident Costs                                         
                                                               from fatalities,                                       
                                                               injuries, and                                          
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2009       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2011
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$324M            yearly cost       because of
                                                               Services:                            because of        lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related                      equipped aircraft data
                                                               Accident Costs                       of \$634K         
                                                               from fatalities,                                       
                                                               injuries, and                                          
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2009       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2011
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$76M             yearly cost       because of
                                                               Services: Mid-Air                    because of        lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Accident                   UAT-equipped      data
                                                               Costs from                           aircraft of       
                                                               fatalities,                          \$3200            
                                                               injuries, and                                          
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2009       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  CDTI carrier       2006-2008         75% reduction in  6/2010
             Results                          or Burden        operations:        baseline airborne difference        
                                                               Airborne delay of  delay for         between airborne  
                                                               equipped flights   equipped arrivals delay during MVMC 
                                                               at Louisville      into Louisville   and VMC           
                                                               International      during marginal   conditions for    
                                                               Airport during     visual conditions equipped          
                                                               marginal visual                      aircraft.         
                                                               instrument                           Estimated savings 
                                                               conditions                           of 20 hrs.        

  2009       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       7.3 CFIT          17% reduction in  6/2011
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          accidents per     CFIT accident     because of
             Results                                           Services:          million           rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight  operations in     equipped with UAT data
                                                               into Terrain       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               Accident Rate for                    display. Actual   
                                                               UAT equipped GA                      totals will be    
                                                               and Air Taxi fleet                   reported showing  
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2009       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       5.7               26% reduction in  6/2011
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          Weather-related   Weather-related   because of
             Results                                           Services:          accidents per     accident rate for lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related    million           GA fleet equipped data
                                                               Accident Rate for  operations in     with UAT          
                                                               equipped UAT       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               equipped GA and                      display in        
                                                               Air Taxi fleet                       coverage area     
                                                                                                    when FIS-B        
                                                                                                    service           
                                                                                                    available. Actual 
                                                                                                    totals will be    
                                                                                                    reported showing  
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2009       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       2.7X10\^-16       71% reduction in  6/2011
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          mid-air           mid-air collision because of
             Results                                           Services: Mid-Air  collisions per    rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Rate for operation         equipped with UAT data
                                                               equipped UAT fleet                   multi-function    
                                                                                                    display in        
                                                                                                    coverage area     
                                                                                                    when TIS-B        
                                                                                                    service           
                                                                                                    available. Actual 
                                                                                                    totals will be    
                                                                                                    reported showing  
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2009       Mission and     Transportation   Air              CDTI carrier       2006-2008         75% reduction in  6/2010
             Business                         Transportation   operations:        baseline airborne difference        
             Results                                           Airborne delay of  delay for         between airborne  
                                                               equipped flights   equipped arrivals delay during MVMC 
                                                               at Louisville      into Louisville   and VMC           
                                                               International      during marginal   conditions for    
                                                               Airport during     visual conditions equipped          
                                                               marginal visual                      aircraft.         
                                                               instrument                           Estimated savings 
                                                               conditions                           of 20 hrs. Actual 
                                                                                                    totals will be    
                                                                                                    reported showing  
                                                                                                    incremental       
                                                                                                    improvement.      

  2009       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD â€" 9/07 See  TBD â€"           1/2010
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire         and avoid         TIS-B/ADS-B       
                                                               proximate traffic                                      
                                                               information.                                           

  2009       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD-9/07 average  TBD â€" access    1/2010
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire weather time of data      FIS-B             
                                                               information        through current                     
                                                                                  process                             

  2009       Technology      Efficiency       Accessibility    Expansion of       Coverage area     Coverage area     1/2010
                                                               Broadcast          contains 24% of   contains 59% of   
                                                               Services: Percent  NAS-wide GA       NAS-wide GA       
                                                               of GA NAS-wide     Operations        Operations        
                                                               operations inside                                      
                                                               FIS-B and TIS-B                                        
                                                               coverage areas                                         

  2009       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission   FIS-B latency \<  1/2010
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            10 sec per        
                                                               Services: FIS-B                      message (Time     
                                                               latency                              from receipt of   
                                                                                                    external data to  
                                                                                                    message           
                                                                                                    transmission)     

  2009       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission   TIS-B latency \<= 1/2010
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            6.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: TIS-B                      measurement of    
                                                               latency                              source position   
                                                                                                    data to aircraft  
                                                                                                    display)          

  2009       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No ADS-R          ADS-R latency \<= 1/2010
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            3.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: ADS-R                      ADS-R message     
                                                               latency                              applicability     
                                                                                                    until display on  
                                                                                                    aircraft)         

  2009       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No ADS-B          End-to-end ADS-B  1/2010
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            surveillance      
                                                               Services: ADS-B                      latency \<= 2.7   
                                                               latency                              seconds for       
                                                                                                    terminal          
                                                                                                    operations,       
                                                                                                    \<=3.3 seconds    
                                                                                                    for en route      
                                                                                                    operations.       

  2009       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       Does not exist    FIS-B service     1/2010
                             Availability                      Broadcast                            availability \>=  
                                                               Services: FIS-B                      99.9%             
                                                               service                                                
                                                               availability                                           

  2009       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No TIS-B          TIS-B service     1/2010
                             Availability                      Broadcast          Availability      availability \>=  
                                                               Services: TIS-B                      99.9%             
                                                               service                                                
                                                               availability                                           

  2009       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No ADS-R          ADS-R service     1/2010
                             Availability                      Broadcast                            availability \>=  
                                                               Services: ADS-R                      99.9%             
                                                               service                                                
                                                               availability                                           

  2010       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2012
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$642M            costs because of  because of
                                                               Services:                            equipped aircraft lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight                    of \$2.2M         data
                                                               into Terrain                                           
                                                               Accident Costs                                         
                                                               from fatalities,                                       
                                                               injuries, and                                          
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2010       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2012
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$329M            yearly cost       because of
                                                               Services:                            because of        lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related                      equipped aircraft data
                                                               Accident Costs                       of \$2.6M         
                                                               from fatalities,                                       
                                                               injuries, and                                          
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2010       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Expansion of       Projected to be   Reduction in      6/2012
             Results                          or Burden        Broadcast          \$77M             yearly cost       because of
                                                               Services: Mid-Air                    because of        lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Accident                   UAT-equipped      data
                                                               Costs from                           aircraft of \$34K 
                                                               fatalities,                                            
                                                               injuries, and                                          
                                                               aircraft damage                                        
                                                               for UAT equipped                                       
                                                               GA fleet                                               

  2010       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  Gulf of Mexico,    Estimated         Reduction of      6/2011
             Results                          or Burden        Low-altitude:      Baseline          passenger delay   
                                                               Average passenger  passenger delay   hrs by 28% or     
                                                               delay of IFR       of 11,538 hrs     3110 hrs a year   
                                                               flights in                           after             
                                                               low-altitude                         communications    
                                                               sector during IMC                    and weather       
                                                               conditions                           installation      

  2010       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer Impact  CDTI carrier       2006-2008         75% reduction in  6/2011
             Results                          or Burden        operations:        baseline airborne difference        
                                                               Airborne delay of  delay for         between airborne  
                                                               equipped flights   equipped arrivals delay during MVMC 
                                                               at Louisville      into Louisville   and VMC           
                                                               International      during marginal   conditions for    
                                                               Airport during     visual conditions equipped          
                                                               marginal visual                      aircraft.         
                                                               instrument                           Estimated annual  
                                                               conditions                           savings of 33     
                                                                                                    hrs.              

  2010       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       7.3 CFIT          17% reduction in  6/2012
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          accidents per     CFIT accident     because of
             Results                                           Services:          million           rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Controlled Flight  operations in     equipped with UAT data
                                                               into Terrain       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               Accident Rate for                    display           
                                                               UAT equipped GA                                        
                                                               and Air Taxi fleet                                     

  2010       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       5.7               26% reduction in  6/2012
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          Weather-related   Weather-related   because of
             Results                                           Services:          accidents per     accident rate for lag in NTSB
                                                               Weather-related    million           GA fleet equipped data
                                                               Accident Rate for  operations in     with UAT          
                                                               equipped UAT       total GA fleet    multi-function    
                                                               equipped GA and                      display in        
                                                               Air Taxi fleet                       coverage area     
                                                                                                    when FIS-B        
                                                                                                    service available 

  2010       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Expansion of       2.7X10\^-16       71% reduction in  6/2012
             Business                         Transportation   Broadcast          mid-air           mid-air collision because of
             Results                                           Services: Mid-Air  collisions per    rate for GA fleet lag in NTSB
                                                               Collision Rate for operation         equipped with UAT data
                                                               equipped UAT fleet                   multi-function    
                                                                                                    display in        
                                                                                                    coverage area     
                                                                                                    when TIS-B        
                                                                                                    service available 

  2010       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Gulf of Mexico,    Estimated         Reduction of      6/2011
             Business                         Transportation   Low-altitude:      Baseline delay of delay hrs by 28%  
             Results                                           Average block      11,538 hrs        or 3110 hrs a     
                                                               delay of IFR                         year after        
                                                               flights in                           communications    
                                                               low-altitude                         and weather       
                                                               sector during IMC                    installation      
                                                               conditions                                             

  2010       Mission and     Transportation   Air              CDTI carrier       2006-2008         75% reduction in  6/2011
             Business                         Transportation   operations:        baseline airborne difference        
             Results                                           Airborne delay of  delay for         between airborne  
                                                               equipped flights   equipped arrivals delay during MVMC 
                                                               at Louisville      into Louisville   and VMC           
                                                               International      during marginal   conditions for    
                                                               Airport during     visual conditions equipped          
                                                               marginal visual                      aircraft.         
                                                               instrument                           Estimated savings 
                                                               conditions                           of 20 hrs.        

  2010       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD â€" 9/07 See  TBD â€"           1/2011
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire         and avoid         TIS-B/ADS-B       
                                                               proximate traffic                                      
                                                               information.                                           

  2010       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Time for aircrew   TBD-9/07 average  TBD â€" access    1/2011
             Activities      Efficiency                        to acquire weather time of data      FIS-B             
                                                               information        through current                     
                                                                                  process                             

  2010       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       CDTI carrier       2006-2008         75% reduction in  6/2011
             Activities      Efficiency                        applications:      Baseline peak     difference        
                                                               Effective capacity arrival rate      between peak      
                                                               of Louisville      during marginal   arrival rates     
                                                               International      visual            during MVMC and   
                                                               Airport during     meteorological    VMC conditions.   
                                                               marginal visual    conditions                          
                                                               instrument                                             
                                                               conditions                                             

  2010       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Gulf of Mexico,    Instantaneous     Instantaneous     1/2011
             Activities      Efficiency                        Low-altitude: IFR  capacity of 10    capacity of 15    
                                                               capacity of        aircraft          aircraft after    
                                                               low-altitude                         communications,   
                                                               sector after                         weather           
                                                               improved services                    installation      
                                                               (communications,                                       
                                                               weather,                                               
                                                               surveillance)                                          

  2010       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission   FIS-B latency \<  1/2011
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            10 sec per        
                                                               Services: FIS-B                      message (Time     
                                                               latency                              from receipt of   
                                                                                                    external data to  
                                                                                                    message           
                                                                                                    transmission)     

  2010       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission   TIS-B latency \<= 1/2011
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            6.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: TIS-B                      measurement of    
                                                               latency                              source position   
                                                                                                    data to aircraft  
                                                                                                    display)          

  2010       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission   ADS-R latency \<= 1/2011
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            3.0 sec (Time of  
                                                               Services: ADS-R                      ADS-R message     
                                                               Latency                              applicability     
                                                                                                    until display on  
                                                                                                    aircraft)         

  2010       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability Expansion of       No Transmission   End-to-end ADS-B  1/2011
                             Data             and Quality      Broadcast                            surveillance      
                                                               Services: ADS-B                      latency \<= 2.7   
                                                               surveillance                         seconds for       
                                                               latency                              terminal          
                                                                                                    operations,       
                                                                                                    \<=3.3 seconds    
                                                                                                    for en route      
                                                                                                    operations.       

  2010       Technology      Information and  Data Reliability CDTI carrier       No Transmission   Terminal ATC      1/2011
                             Data             and Quality      operations & Gulf                    surveillance      
                                                               of Mexico â€" Low                    application       
                                                               & high altitude:                     latency \<= 2.7   
                                                               Terminal ATC                         sec (time of      
                                                               surveillance                         applicability of  
                                                               application                          ADS-B Message     
                                                               latency                              data until        
                                                                                                    display by ATC    
                                                                                                    Automation)       

  2010       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Gulf of Mexico,    No Communications Upgraded          1/2011
                             Availability                      Low-altitude:      and Weather       communications    
                                                               Availability of                      and weather       
                                                               upgraded                             station           
                                                               communications and                   availability \>=  
                                                               weather stations                     99.9%             
                                                               in low-altitude                                        
                                                               Gulf of Mexico                                         
                                                               sector                                                 

  2010       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No FIS-B          FIS-B service     1/2011
                             Availability                      Broadcast                            availability \>=  
                                                               Services: FIS-B                      99.9%             
                                                               service                                                
                                                               availability                                           

  2010       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No TIS-B          TIS-B service     1/2011
                             Availability                      Broadcast                            availability \>=  
                                                               Services: TIS-B                      99.9%             
                                                               service                                                
                                                               availability                                           

  2010       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expansion of       No TIS-B          ADS-R service     1/2011
                             Availability                      Broadcast          Availability      availability \>=  
                                                               Services: ADS-R                      99.9%             
                                                               service                                                
                                                               availability                                           

  2010       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     CDTI carrier       No ADS-B          ADS-B service     1/2011
                             Availability                      operations & Gulf                    availability \>=  
                                                               of Mexico â€" Low                    99.999% (Includes 
                                                               & high altitude:                     total outage time 
                                                               ADS-B service                        for navigation    
                                                               availability                         source, back up   
                                                                                                    surveillance      
                                                                                                    source, broadcast 
                                                                                                    services          
                                                                                                    infrastructure,   
                                                                                                    and automation    
                                                                                                    system)           
  ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- -----------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
  **I.E. Security and Privacy**                                   

                                                                  

  **In order to successfully address this area of the business    
  case, each question below must be answered at the               
  system/application level, not at a program or agency level.     
  Systems supporting this investment on the planning and          
  operational systems security tables should match the systems on 
  the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security    
  Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory    
  and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should  
  use the same name or identifier).**                             

  **All systems supporting and/or part of this investment should  
  be included in the tables below, inclusive of both agency owned 
  systems and contractor systems. For IT investments under        
  development, security and privacy planning must proceed in      
  parallel with the development of the system/s to ensure IT      
  security and privacy requirements and costs are identified and  
  incorporated into the overall lifecycle of the system/s.**      

  **Please respond to the questions below and verify the system   
  owner took the following actions:**                             

  **1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been          Yes
  identified and integrated into the overall costs of the         
  investment:**                                                   

  **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the \"Percentage IT Security\" for  0.870000
  the budget year:**                                              

  **2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a  Yes
  part of the overall risk management effort for each system      
  supporting or part of this investment.**                        

                                                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

  ------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
  **5. Have any weaknesses, not yet remediated, related to any of the Yes
  systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by    
  the agency or IG?**                                                 

  **   a. If \"yes,\" have those weaknesses been incorporated         Yes
  agency\'s plan of action and milestone process?**                   

  **6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is         No
  requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?**                    

  **   a. If \"yes,\" specify the amount, provide a general           
  description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request    
  will remediate the weakness.**                                      

                                                                      

  **8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:**              
  ------------------------------------------------------------------- -----

  ----------- ----------- ----------------- ------------- ----------- ------------
  **Name of   **Is this a **Is there a      **Is the PIA  **Is a      **Was a new
  System**    new         Privacy Impact    available to  System of   or amended
              system?**   Assessment (PIA)  the public?** Records     SORN
                          that covers this                Notice      published in
                          system?**                       (SORN)      FY 06?**
                                                          required    
                                                          for this    
                                                          system?**   

  Broadcast   Yes         No, because the   No, because a No          No, because
  Services                system does not   PIA is not                the system
  System                  contain, process, yet required              is not a
  Program                 or transmit       to be                     Privacy Act
                          personal          completed at              system of
                          identifying       this time.                records.
                          information.                                
  ----------- ----------- ----------------- ------------- ----------- ------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **I.F. Enterprise Architecture (EA)**            |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **In order to successfully address this area of  |                   |
| the business case and capital asset plan you     |                   |
| must ensure the investment is included in the    |                   |
| agency\'s EA and Capital Planning and Investment |                   |
| Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and     |                   |
| supports the FEA. You must also ensure the       |                   |
| business case demonstrates the relationship      |                   |
| between the investment and the business,         |                   |
| performance, data, services, application, and    |                   |
| technology layers of the agency\'s EA.**         |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **1. Is this investment included in your         | Yes               |
| agency\'s target enterprise architecture?**      |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **   a. If \"no,\" please explain why?**         |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **2. Is this investment included in the          | No                |
| agency\'s EA Transition Strategy?**              |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the investment name  |                   |
| as identified in the Transition Strategy         |                   |
| provided in the agency\'s most recent annual EA  |                   |
| Assessment.**                                    |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **   b. If \"no,\" please explain why?**         |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| To effectively balance the development and       |                   |
| management of the DOT Transition Strategy, the   |                   |
| first version was scoped to include those        |                   |
| investments with development activities (non     |                   |
| O&M). Additionally, as the NAS Architecture was  |                   |
| publicly available, it was also not fully        |                   |
| integrated with the materials forwarded to OMB   |                   |
| in February 2006. However, the NAS is considered |                   |
| part of the DOT Transition Strategy and will be  |                   |
| more fully integrated within the next revision.  |                   |
| Future revisions are set to expand upon that     |                   |
| scope and include both steady state (O&M)        |                   |
| investments and expanded linkages to the NAS     |                   |
| Architecture. Since this FAA investment does not |                   |
| appear to be specifically mentioned within the   |                   |
| DOT Transition Strategy or the FAA Modernization |                   |
| Blueprint, please refer to the following public  |                   |
| NAS websites which document the plan for the     |                   |
| FAA\'s target architecture where the investment  |                   |
| can be found as well as a sequencing plan        |                   |
| showing the dependencies in the NAS Operational  |                   |
| Improvement Report. Please reference the link    |                   |
| and search on ADS-B.                             |                   |
| http://www.nas-architectur                       |                   |
| e.faa.gov/nas5/downloads/full_oi_long_report.pdf |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **3. Service Reference Model (SRM) Table:**      |                   |
|                                                  |                   |
| **Identify the service components funded by this |                   |
| major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, |                   |
| content management, customer relationship        |                   |
| management, etc.). Provide this information in   |                   |
| the format of the following table. For detailed  |                   |
| guidance regarding components, please refer to   |                   |
| http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.**           |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+

  ---------------------------- ---------------- ------------ --------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
  **Agency Component Name**    **Agency         **Service    **FEA SRM       **FEA SRM     **FEA       **FEA       **Internal   **BY Funding
                               Component        Domain**     Service Type**  Component**   Service     Service     or External  Percentage**
                               Description**                                               Component   Component   Reuse?**     
                                                                                           Reused      Reused                   
                                                                                           Name**      UPI**                    

  Aircraft-to-Aircraft         Aircraft are     Business     Visualization   Mapping /                             No Reuse     75
  Separation (ATC-Separation   separated from   Analytical                   Geospatial /                                       
  Assurance):                  other known      Services                     Elevation /                                        
                               aircraft in the                               GPS                                                
                               terminal, en                                                                                     
                               route, and                                                                                       
                               oceanic                                                                                          
                               environments.                                                                                    
                               Separation                                                                                       
                               assurance                                                                                        
                               involves the                                                                                     
                               application of                                                                                   
                               separation                                                                                       
                               standards to                                                                                     
                               ensure aircraft                                                                                  
                               remain an                                                                                        
                               appropriate                                                                                      
                               minimum distance                                                                                 
                               or altitude from                                                                                 
                               other known                                                                                      
                               aircraft.                                                                                        
                               Standards are                                                                                    
                               defined for                                                                                      
                               aircraft based                                                                                   
                               on aircraft                                                                                      
                               type, size,                                                                                      
                               equipment, and                                                                                   
                               for operating in                                                                                 
                               different                                                                                        
                               environments.                                                                                    
                               (NAS                                                                                             
                               ATC-Separation                                                                                   
                               Assurance):                                                                                      

  Aircraft-Terrain-Obstacles   Aircraft are     Business     Visualization   Mapping /                             No Reuse     5
  (ATC-Separation Assurance)   separated from   Analytical                   Geospatial /                                       
                               terrain and      Services                     Elevation /                                        
                               obstacles using                               GPS                                                
                               published safety                                                                                 
                               zones and                                                                                        
                               processing                                                                                       
                               position and                                                                                     
                               intent                                                                                           
                               information.                                                                                     
                               Aircraft                                                                                         
                               positions are                                                                                    
                               derived from                                                                                     
                               navigational                                                                                     
                               systems,                                                                                         
                               surveillance                                                                                     
                               information,                                                                                     
                               visual                                                                                           
                               orientation, and                                                                                 
                               position reports                                                                                 
                               to ensure an                                                                                     
                               aircraft\'s                                                                                      
                               trajectory                                                                                       
                               maintains a                                                                                      
                               minimum safe                                                                                     
                               distance from                                                                                    
                               ground,                                                                                          
                               mountainous                                                                                      
                               terrain, and                                                                                     
                               man-made                                                                                         
                               obstacles. (NAS                                                                                  
                               ATC-Separation                                                                                   
                               Assurance)                                                                                       

  Traffic Advisory             Traffic          Business     Visualization   Mapping /                             No Reuse     10
  (ATC-Advisory Services)      advisories are   Analytical                   Geospatial /                                       
                               provided to      Services                     Elevation /                                        
                               alert aircraft                                GPS                                                
                               to potential                                                                                     
                               conflicts with                                                                                   
                               others on the                                                                                    
                               surface or                                                                                       
                               in-flight. For                                                                                   
                               example, traffic                                                                                 
                               advisories are                                                                                   
                               provided to                                                                                      
                               aircraft or                                                                                      
                               other flight                                                                                     
                               objects that are                                                                                 
                               in the proximity                                                                                 
                               of hot air/gas                                                                                   
                               balloons,                                                                                        
                               missile                                                                                          
                               launches, or                                                                                     
                               other potential                                                                                  
                               hazards. Traffic                                                                                 
                               advisories for                                                                                   
                               aircraft on the                                                                                  
                               surface include                                                                                  
                               the number,                                                                                      
                               type, position,                                                                                  
                               and intent of                                                                                    
                               the ground                                                                                       
                               traffic. (NAS                                                                                    
                               ATC-Advisory                                                                                     
                               Services)                                                                                        

  Weather Advisories           ATC Advisories - Business     Visualization   Mapping /                             No Reuse     10
  Capability (ATC-Advisory     Weather          Analytical                   Geospatial /                                       
  Services)                    information is   Services                     Elevation /                                        
                               available either                              GPS                                                
                               automatically or                                                                                 
                               manually through                                                                                 
                               communication                                                                                    
                               with ATC and                                                                                     
                               other                                                                                            
                               facilities. For                                                                                  
                               example, pilots                                                                                  
                               receive weather                                                                                  
                               advisories from                                                                                  
                               automated                                                                                        
                               surface                                                                                          
                               observing                                                                                        
                               systems and                                                                                      
                               other systems,                                                                                   
                               ATC facilities,                                                                                  
                               and aircraft                                                                                     
                               operations                                                                                       
                               centers (AOCs).                                                                                  
                               Advisories                                                                                       
                               provide both                                                                                     
                               routine and                                                                                      
                               hazardous                                                                                        
                               weather                                                                                          
                               information                                                                                      
                               and/or flight                                                                                    
                               conditions at                                                                                    
                               airports or                                                                                      
                               along a flight                                                                                   
                               path. (NAS                                                                                       
                               ATC-Advisory                                                                                     
                               Services)                                                                                        
  ---------------------------- ---------------- ------------ --------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
|                                                                     |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **Use existing SRM Components or identify as \"NEW\". A \"NEW\"     |   |
| component is one not already identified as a service component in   |   |
| the FEA SRM.**                                                      |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but |   |
| being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no,        |   |
| identify the reused service component funded by the other           |   |
| investment and identify the other investment using the Unique       |   |
| Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53          |   |
| submission.**                                                       |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **\'Internal\' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency   |   |
| within a department is reusing a service component provided by      |   |
| another agency within the same department. \'External\' reuse is    |   |
| one agency within a department reusing a service component provided |   |
| by another agency in another department. A good example of this is  |   |
| an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations  |   |
| across the federal government.**                                    |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount  |   |
| used for each service component listed in the table. If external,   |   |
| provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for  |   |
| the service.**                                                      |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
|                                                                     |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **4. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:**                       |   |
|                                                                     |   |
| **To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA   |   |
| Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas,     |   |
| Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this   |   |
| IT investment.**                                                    |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+

  ------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------- ------------------
  **FEA SRM     **FEA TRM        **FEA TRM Service  **FEA TRM        **Service
  Component**   Service Area**   Category**         Service          Specification
                                                    Standard**       (i.e. vendor or
                                                                     product name)**

  Mapping /     Component        Data Interchange   Data Exchange    TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  Framework                                            contract
  Elevation /                                                        negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.

  Mapping /     Component        Presentation /     Content          TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  Framework        Interface          Rendering        contract
  Elevation /                                                        negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.

  Mapping /     Service Access   Access Channels    Other Electronic TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  and Delivery                        Channels         contract
  Elevation /                                                        negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.

  Mapping /     Service          Interoperability   Data             TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  Interface and                       Transformation   contract
  Elevation /   Integration                                          negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.

  Mapping /     Service Platform Database / Storage Database         TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  and                                                  contract
  Elevation /   Infrastructure                                       negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.

  Mapping /     Service Platform Hardware /         Servers /        TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  and              Infrastructure     Computers        contract
  Elevation /   Infrastructure                                       negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.

  Mapping /     Service Platform Software           Test Management  TBD after prime
  Geospatial /  and              Engineering                         contract
  Elevation /   Infrastructure                                       negotiation
  GPS                                                                scheduled for June
                                                                     2007.
  ------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------- ------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **Service Components identified in  
  the previous question should be     
  entered in this column. Please      
  enter multiple rows for FEA SRM     
  Components supported by multiple    
  TRM Service Specifications**        

  **In the Service Specification      
  field, Agencies should provide      
  information on the specified        
  technical standard or vendor        
  product mapped to the FEA TRM       
  Service Standard, including model   
  or version numbers, as              
  appropriate.**                      

                                      

  **5. Will the application leverage  No
  existing components and/or          
  applications across the Government  
  (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?**   

  **   a. If \"yes,\" please          
  describe.**                         

                                      

  **6. Does this investment provide   No
  the public with access to a         
  government automated information    
  system?**                           

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does customer    
  access require specific software    
  (e.g., a specific web browser       
  version)?**                         

  **      1. If \"yes,\" provide the   
  specific product name(s) and        
  version number(s) of the required   
  software and the date when the      
  public will be able to access this  
  investment by any software (i.e. to 
  ensure equitable and timely access  
  of government information and       
  services).**                        

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Exhibit 300: Part II: Planning, Acquisition and Performance
  Information**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------- -----------
  **II.A. Alternatives Analysis**                                 

                                                                  

  **Part II should be completed only for investments identified   
  as \"Planning\" or \"Full Acquisition,\" or \"Mixed             
  Life-Cycle\" investments in response to Question 6 in Part I,   
  Section A above.**                                              

  **In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and  
  consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the 
  current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A- 94  
  for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT   
  investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your   
  Benefit/Cost Analysis.**                                        

  **1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this          Yes
  project?**                                                      

  **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the date the analysis was           5/31/2006
  completed?**                                                    

  **   b. If \"no,\" what is the anticipated date this analysis    
  will be completed?**                                            

  **   c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain       
  why:**                                                          

                                                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------- -----------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **II.B. Risk Management**           

                                      

  **You should have performed a risk  
  assessment during the early         
  planning and initial concept phase  
  of this investment\'s life-cycle,   
  developed a risk-adjusted           
  life-cycle cost estimate and a plan 
  to eliminate, mitigate or manage    
  risk, and be actively managing risk 
  throughout the investment\'s        
  life-cycle.**                       

  **1. Does the investment have a     Yes
  Risk Management Plan?**             

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     5/10/2006
  date of the plan?**                 

  **   b. Has the Risk Management     Yes
  Plan been significantly changed     
  since last year\'s submission to    
  OMB?**                              

  **c. If \"yes,\" describe any       
  significant changes:**              

  The Risk Management Plan (RMP) was  
  developed as a part of the JRC2b    
  process. Additionally, the Risk     
  Management Board meets bi-monthly   
  and updates the risks, their        
  mitigation strategies, and          
  evaluates their Risk level. These   
  updates are included in the risk    
  database and reported as a part of  
  the RMP. The program can produce    
  the approved RMP, a refresher       
  workshop training package, evidence 
  of biweekly Risk Board meetings,    
  identified program risks and their  
  status, and associated mitigation   
  plans and status.                   

  **2. If there currently is no plan, 
  will a plan be developed?**         

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the      
  planned completion date?**          

  **   b. If \"no,\" what is the      
  strategy for managing the risks?**  

                                      

  **3. Briefly describe how           
  investment risks are reflected in   
  the life cycle cost estimate and    
  investment schedule:**              

  RESULTS: Cost adjustments were made 
  to Program Management and System    
  Engineering work breakdown          
  structure (WBS) elements, which     
  resulted in an overall risk         
  adjustment of 13.5% to total        
  program costs. Schedule adjustments 
  were made to individual tasks and   
  are reflected in the task           
  durations. METHODOLOGY: The program 
  implemented the approved Risk       
  Management Plan which provides the  
  framework for the assigned Risk     
  Management Coordinator and          
  designated Risk Board to implement  
  the process for identifying,        
  analyzing, mitigating and managing  
  program risks. The risks were       
  documented and assessed as to their 
  likelihood, consequence and overall 
  risk level, and these assessments   
  were input to the cost and schedule 
  estimation processes. For cost      
  adjustments, the risks were         
  \"mapped\" to elements in the       
  program WBS based on information in 
  the risk statements and mitigation  
  plans which were used to determine  
  areas in the estimate that may be   
  impacted, and ranges for the        
  triangular distribution (i.e.,      
  pessimistic, most likely,           
  optimistic). A software tool was    
  used to perform a Monte Carlo       
  simulation against the estimates,   
  and the results were included in    
  the final submission. For schedule  
  estimates, the risks were used to   
  adjust the durations that were      
  included in the program schedule    
  using a similar approach (i.e.,     
  pessimistic, most likely and        
  optimistic estimates). ADS-B will   
  establish a management reserve for  
  both schedule and costs. As the     
  program identifies the recommended  
  solution, the program risk          
  assessment will be used to          
  establish a management reserve      
  strategy for the program and for    
  the contractors. The management     
  reserves will be monitored and      
  revised as the program evolves and  
  risk profile changes. Total FAA     
  Costs (In Thousands) Risk Adjusted: 
  2,481,782 No Risk Adjustment:       
  2,185,652                           
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **II.C. Cost and Schedule           
  Performance**                       

                                      

  **1. Does the earned value          No
  management system meet the criteria 
  in ANSI/EIA Standard-748?**         

                                      

  **2. Answer the following questions 
  about current cumulative cost and   
  schedule performance. The numbers   
  reported below should reflect       
  current actual information. (Per    
  OMB requirements Cost/Schedule      
  Performance information should      
  include both Government and         
  Contractor Costs):**                

  **   a. What is the Planned Value   9900.000000
  (PV)?**                             

  **   b. What is the Earned Value    9900.000000
  (EV)?**                             

  **   c. What is the actual cost of  9900.000
  work performed (AC)?**              

  **   d. What costs are included in  Contractor Only
  the reported Cost/Schedule          
  Performance information (Government 
  Only/Contractor Only/Both)?**       

  **   e. \"As of\" date:**           6/30/2006

  **3. What is the calculated         1.000000
  Schedule Performance Index (SPI=    
  EV/PV)?**                           

  **4. What is the schedule variance  0
  (SV = EV-PV)?**                     

  **5. What is the calculated Cost    1.00
  Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)?**  

  **6. What is the cost variance      0
  (CV=EV-AC)?**                       

  **7. Is the CV% or SV% greater than No
  +/- 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100; SV%=    
  SV/PV x 100)**                      

  **   a. If \"yes,\" was it the?**    

  **   b. If \"yes,\" explain the     
  variance:**                         

                                      

  **   c. If \"yes,\" what corrective 
  actions are being taken?**          

                                      

  **   d. What is most current        2481782.000000
  \"Estimate at Completion\"?**       

  **8. Have any significant changes   No
  been made to the baseline during    
  the past fiscal year?**             

  **8. If \"yes,\" when was it        No
  approved by OMB?**                  

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------