**THE TWENTY-FOURTH MEETING OF THE**

**INFORMAL PACIFIC ATC CO-ORDINATING GROUP**

**(IPACG/24)**

(Honolulu, USA, 23 - 27 January 2006)

Agenda Item 2a Report on relevant outcomes from other meetings

**REPORT ON RELEVANT OUTCOMES FROM APANPIRG/16**

(Presented by the Federal Aviation Administration)

> [Summary]{.underline}
>
> During the Sixteenth Meeting of the Asia Pacific Air Navigation
> Planning and Implementation Regional Group (APANPIRG/16), several
> conclusions were made which affected the work of IPACG and other ATS
> coordination groups. This paper summarizes those items.

1.  **Summary of relevant conclusions from APANPIRG/16:**

# 

# 1.1 **Conclusion 16/4 -- Traffic Sample Data Collection**

> That, States be advised by the Regional Office that December every
> year had been adopted for the routine collection of 30 days of traffic
> sample data to satisfy airspace safety monitoring requirements.

# 

# 1.2 **Conclusion 16/5 -- No implementation of reduced separation unless compliant with Annex 11**

> That, recognizing that some States had not adequately complied with
> safety management provisions, the Regional Office advise States of the
> Asia/Pacific Region that further regional implementation of reduced
> separation minima should only proceed in circumstances where
> implementing States can demonstrate an ability to comply with Annex
> 11, Chapter 2, safety management provisions for the continuous
> monitoring and regular assessment of the safety level achieved.

# 

# 1.3 **Conclusion 16/6 -- Non Provision of safety related data by States**

> That the Regional Office advise that States not providing safety
> related data to approved regional safety monitoring agencies,
> including RMAs, in accordance with the requirements of safety
> monitoring agencies will be included in the APANPIRG List of
> Deficiencies in the ATM/AIS/SAR fields.

# 

# 1.4 **Conclusion 16/10 -- Review of ATS Route Catalogue by States**

That, the States concerned study the routes in the Asia/Pacific ATS
Route Catalogue in respect to the feasibility of the route requirements,
in order to consider their implementation with appropriate priorities,
and to raise route implementation proposals at relevant ATS Coordination
Meetings in the Asia/Pacific Region.

# 1.5 **Decision 16/14 -- Contingency Plans on ATS Coordination Group Agendas**

That, the development of State Contingency Plans be included as an item
on the agenda of State ATS coordination meetings.

# 

# 1.6 **Decision 16/16 -- Civil Military Coordination**

That, "Civil Military Coordination" be included as an item on the
agendas and/or task lists of regional ATS Coordination Groups.

# 

**2. Recommendations**

2.1 The meeting is invited to take the following action on the
Conclusions noted above:

a\. 16/4: Note the requirement to submit traffic sample data for
December of each calendar year;

b\. 16/5: Note the requirement to demonstrate an ability to comply with
Annex 11, Chapter 2 safety management provisions for the continuous
monitoring and regular assessment of the safety level achieved for
implementations of reduced separation minima;

c\. 16/6: Note that the failure to provide safety related data to
approved regional safety monitoring agencies will be included in the
APANPIRG List of Deficiencies in the ATM/AIS/SAR fields.

d\. 16/10: Consider adding the following as a standing agenda item for
IPACG meetings: "Review of relevant route requirements in the
Asia/Pacific ATS Route Catalogue".

e\. 16/14: Consider adding the following as a standing agenda item for
IPACG meetings: "Develop necessary State contingency plans".

f\. 16/16: Consider adding the following as a standing agenda item for
IPACG meetings: "Civil Military Coordination".

\- END -