HQ 961052

May 10, 2002

CLA-2 RR:CR:TE 961052 SG

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 6204.69.2510

Port Director, LAX

U.S. Customs Service

11099 S. La Cienaga Blvd

Los Angeles, CA 90045

RE: Application For Further Review of 2720-97-100784; Classification of
Women\'s Tencel Lyocell Trousers; Legal Note1 to Chapter 54; Synthetic
and Artificial Fibers; Chemical Transformation

Dear Sir:

This is in response to the request for further review of a protest
timely filed on July 17, 1997, by the law firm of Grunfeld, Desiderio,
Lebowitz & Silverman, on behalf of their client, the Brunzack
Corporation, against your decision regarding the classification of
women\'s tencel pants. The merchandise was classified when entered on
January 2, 1997, as women's trousers, of artificial fibers, in
subheading 6204.69.2510, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
Annotated (HTSUSA). The classification has been protested. It is claimed
the proper classification of these garments is as women's trousers,
other, other, in subheading 6204.69.9044, HTSUSA. Our decision follows.

FACTS:

The garments at issue are women\'s trousers that are made of 100% woven
lyocell fabric. The lyocell used in this case was manufactured under the
trade name of Tencel®. Upon liquidation, the trousers were classified in
subheading 6204.69.2510, HTSUSA, which provides for \"Women\'s or
girls\' suits, ensembles, suit-type jackets, blazers, dresses, skirts,
trousers, bib and brace overalls, breeches and shorts (other than
swimwear): Trousers, bib and brace overalls, breeches and shorts: \[o\]f
other textile materials: \[o\]f artificial fibers: \[t\]rousers,
breeches and shorts: \[o\]ther: \[t\]rousers and breeches:
\[w\]omen\'s.\"

It is the protestant\'s position that the trousers are properly
classified in subheading 6204.69.9044, HTSUSA, which provides for
\"\[w\]omen\'s or girls\' suits, ensembles, suit-type jackets, blazers,
dresses, skirts, trousers, bib and brace overalls, breeches and shorts
(other than swimwear): \[t\]rousers, bib and brace overalls, breeches
and shorts: \[o\]f other textile material:; \[o\]ther; \[t\]rousers,
breeches and shorts: \[o\]ther, \[t\]rousers and breeches.\" It is
protestant's position that lyocell is not an artificial fiber, but an
"other" fiber, and that trousers of this fabric should be classified as
trousers of other textile materials not specifically identified.
Protestant has provided an analysis of the production processes for
lyocell to support their position.

The Customs laboratory reviewed the documents submitted as protestant's
analysis was highly technical and contained various chemical formulae.

ISSUE:

What is the tariff classification of the women\'s 100% woven lyocell
trousers under the HTSUSA? Is lyocell an artificial fiber?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

The classification of goods under the HTSUS is governed by the General
Rules of Interpretation (GRI\'s). GRI 1 provides that classification
shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any
relative section or chapter notes. In the event that the goods cannot be
classified solely on the basis of GRI 1, and if the headings and legal
notes do not otherwise require, the remaining GRI\'s may be applied.

Chapter 62, HTSUS, provides for \"\[a\]rticles of apparel and clothing
accessories, not knitted or crocheted.\" Heading 6204, HTSUS, provides
for, inter alia, women\'s trousers. As the subject woven trousers are
not knitted or crocheted, they are classifiable in heading 6204, HTSUS.
In classifying these garments at the six digit subheading level, we have
to determine whether the lyocell fabric is considered an artificial or
synthetic fiber under the HTSUS.

Lyocell is a generic term recognized by the Federal Trade Commission as
a \"subclass of rayon\", and described as a class of fibers of
regenerated natural cellulose. According to the [Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology]{.underline}, Volume Number 10,
Fourth Edition (1994), "(a) regenerated fiber is one formed when a
natural polymer, or its chemical derivative, is dissolved and extruded
as a continuous filament, and the chemical nature of the natural polymer
is either retained or regenerated after the fiber formation process.

Since lyocell is not an [eo nomine]{.underline} fiber in the tariff,
when classifying garments made of lyocell we have to determine whether
lyocell is encompassed by any of the fibers which are specifically named
or whether it would reside in the "other" provision under the heading
for the apparel. Lyocell does not fall within the rubric of wool,
cotton, or silk. The only remaining expressly named fiber grouping is
man-made fibers, which term is specifically defined as follows in Note 1
to Chapter 54, HTSUS:

Throughout the tariff schedule, the term \"man-made fibers\" means
staple fibers and filaments of organic polymers produced by
manufacturing processes, either:

\(a\) By polymerization of organic monomers, such as polyamides,
polyesters, polyurethanes or polyvinyl derivatives; or

\(b\) By chemical transformation of natural organic polymers (for
example, cellulose, casein, proteins or algae), such as viscose rayon,
cellulose acetate, cupro or alginates.

The terms \"[synthetic]{.underline}\" and \"[artificial]{.underline}\",
used in relation to fibers, mean: synthetic: fibers as defined at (a);
artificial: fibers as defined at (b).

The terms \"[man-made]{.underline}\", \"[synthetic]{.underline}\" and
\"[artificial]{.underline}\" shall have the same meanings when used in
relation to \"[textile materials]{.underline}\".

The position of the protestant is that lyocell is not a synthetic fiber
as it is not produced by polymerization of organic monomers, but rather
a physical change in form of a pre-existing organic polymer-namely
cellulose. We agree.

The protestant argues that lyocell does not meet the definition of an
artificial fiber either, since it is not produced by a "chemical
transformation" as it appears in the legal note above. The protestant
states that "artificial fiber" as defined in Note 1(b) does not include
[all]{.underline} fibers manufactured from natural organic polymers, but
rather [only]{.underline} those manufactured by chemical transformation.
We agree. Artificial fibers do not include natural cellulosic fibers
such as cotton, flax or ramie. The term "chemical transformation" is
generally understood to mean altering the internal bonds of a compound.
It is claimed that in the manufacture of lyocell, internal bonds are not
chemically altered in order to produce the fiber; that the process is
purely a physical change in form from wood pulp to fiber; and absent a
chemical transformation of the cellulose, lyocell cannot be considered
an artificial fiber within the tariff meaning of that term.

Protestant has concluded that since lyocell does not meet the
definitions of any man-made fiber, it is in effect a natural cellulosic
fiber.

Lyocell is a generic term for manufactured or regenerated fibers made of
wood pulp cellulose. Although it is given a separate generic name, in
1996, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) added lyocell, as a
sub-category of rayon, an artificial fiber, to the list of approved
generic names. The FTC defines lyocell fibers as cellulose fibers
obtained by an organic solvent spinning process. ("Organic solvent" is
defined as \"a mixture of organic chemicals and water.\" "Solvent
spinning" is defined as "dissolving and spinning without the formation
of a derivative.") Courtaulds Fibers, Inc. markets the fiber under the
registered tradename Tencel® and is credited with the development of
this fiber.

Lyocell is repeatedly defined as a man-made and manufactured "cellulosic
fiber". Several textile sources, including Kosa\'s [Dictionary of Fiber
& Textile Technology,]{.underline} define \"cellulosic fiber\" as a
fiber composed of, or derived from, cellulose. Examples of cellulose
fibers are rayon (regenerated cellulose), acetate (cellulose acetate),
and triacetate (cellulose triacetate). All of these are considered to be
artificial cellulose fibers. As lyocell is produced from wood pulp, it
meets the definition of a cellulosic fiber.

Lyocell is very closely related to viscose rayon, itself a regenerated
cellulosic fiber. Both go through similar steps in the manufacturing
process. According to
[www.fibersource.com](http://www.fibersource.com/), lyocell fiber
production entails raw cellulose directly dissolved in an amine oxide
solvent. Following filtration, the solution is extruded into an aqueous
bath of dilute amine oxide, and coagulated into fiber form. The final
fiber form is a cellulosic fiber. Viscose rayon is made by converting
purified cellulose to xanthate, dissolving the xanthate in dilute
caustic soda and then regenerating the cellulose from the product as it
emerges from the spinneret. See,
[www.fibersource.com](http://www.fibersource.com/)[.]{.underline}

Lyocell is a fiber that undergoes a change in form during its
manufacturing process from wood pulp to fiber. It enters the
manufacturing process as cellulose, goes through an intermediate stage
and completes the process as a regenerated cellulose product (one
derived from wood cellulose). During the course of this process, a
complex is formed between the solvent and the cellulose, but no chemical
intermediate has been identified. The final outcome of the regeneration
therefore appears to be a change in the physical form of the fiber and
not a chemical transformation of the molecular structure of the fibers.
The final fiber product is therefore the result of an alteration of the
physical form of the original wood pulp cellulose source, and not the
result of a chemical transformation.

The literature also describes the cellulosic fibers that compose lyocell
as being regenerated or manufactured. Kosa\'s [Dictionary of Fiber &
Textile Technology]{.underline} define "manufactured fibers" as a
"genera of fibers which may be modified or transformed natural
polymers." Regenerated cellulose is defined as "material that begins as
cellulose but at some stage in the chemical processing takes the form of
another chemical compound, then appears again in its completed stage as
cellulose." See, [Dictionary of Fiber & Textile Technology]{.underline},
at 161. The final outcome of the regeneration is a change in the
physical form of the fiber and not a chemical transformation of the
molecular structure of the fibers. Accordingly, we agree that the
manufacture of lyocell does not seem to involve a chemical
transformation or modification.

Despite not meeting the tariff definition of an artificial fiber, we
note that industry sources such as [Fabric link Retailer\'s
Forum]{.underline} describe and list lyocell as a man-made fiber.
Lyocell fibers are not directly harvested from nature and are the result
of textile chemical engineering. [Fairchild\'s Dictionary of
Textile]{.underline}, published by Fairchild Publications, defines
artificial fibers as any class of fibers not found in nature. Included
are both regenerated and synthetic fibers. We note that industry sources
we reviewed (e.g. [www.fibersource.com]{.underline}) consider lyocell to
be a cellulosic manufactured fiber and a man-made fiber
([www.fabriclink.com]{.underline}). We note that these same industry
sources do not view lyocell as a vegetable fiber. The lyocell fibers are
therefore not natural, but man-made.

Lyocell, the protestant has admitted, is a cellulose fiber.

We must therefore consider how we would classify lyocell fibers. It is
conceded by the protester that lyocell is not a synthetic fiber. We will
agree that absent a chemical transformation, lyocell cannot be
considered to be an artificial fiber within the tariff meaning of the
term. This would preclude lyocell from being an artificial fiber. In
addition, we agree with textile sources that lyocell is not considered a
vegetable fiber. We note that when classifying fibers, yarn, or fabric
there is no residual or \"other\" provision. Accordingly, lyocell fibers
cannot be classified in accordance with the principles of GRI 1, 2, or
3. Classification would therefore be based on GRI 4, which provides that
\"(g)oods which cannot be classified in accordance with the above rules
shall be classified under the heading appropriate to the goods to which
they are most akin.\"

In determining whether lyocell is most akin to a vegetable or artificial
fiber we considered the following:

1\. Lyocell is repeatedly defined by textile sources as a man-made and
manufactured cellulose fiber.

2\. Lyocell enters the manufacturing process as cellulose, goes through
an intermediate stage where a complex is formed between the solvent and
the cellulose, and completes the process as regenerated cellulose. This
results in a modified or transformed natural polymer.

3\. The textile industry views the process of manufacturing lyocell as
resulting in a man-made or manufactured fiber.

4\. Like viscose rayon and cuprammonium rayon, the final product known
as lyocell is not one found in nature, although the origin of these
fibers is natural.

4\. Lyocell is not directly harvested from nature but is the result of
textile chemical engineering.

5\. The Explanatory Notes to Chapter 54 indicate that a chemical
transformation or modification may not be an absolute requirement of an
artificial fiber.

6\. Note 1 to Chapter 54 indicates that the terms man-made and
artificial have the same meaning when used in relation to textile
materials.

6\. Industry sources do not view lyocell as a vegetable fiber.

We note that although the process used to make lyocell is not exactly
the artificial process as described in Note 1, Chapter 54, HTSUS (as
there is no chemical transformation), it is our view that based on the
above, lyocell fiber is more akin to an artificial than a vegetable
fiber. We would therefore classify it under the provision for
\"artificial fibers\" under GRI 4, not because it is an artificial
fiber, but because it is most akin to an artificial fiber. The same
reasoning would apply when classifying lyocell yarn and fabric, both of
which would be classified as of artificial fibers. As a consequence, it
follows that a garment made of lyocell would also be classified under
the provision for \"of artificial fibres.\"

Accordingly, lyocell is classified as of artificial fiber, and as the
subject trousers are composed of woven lyocell fabric, they are
considered to be made of artificial fibers. Therefore, they are
correctly classifiable as women's trousers, of artificial fibers, in
subheading 6204.69.2510, HTSUSA.

HOLDING:

The protest should be DENIED. The women\'s 100% woven lyocell trousers
under protest are properly classified in subheading 6204.69.2510, HTSUS,
which provides for \"\[w\]omen\'s or girls\' suits, ensembles, suit-type
jackets, blazers, dresses, skirts, trousers, bib and brace overalls,
breeches and shorts (other than swimwear): Trousers, bib and brace
overalls, breeches and shorts: \[o\]f other textile materials: \[o\]f
artificial fibers: \[t\]rousers, breeches and shorts: \[o\]ther:
\[t\]rousers and breeches: \[w\]omen\'s.\" The merchandise is dutiable
at the 1997 general column one rate of duty of 29.9% ad valorem and
falls within textile quota category 648.

In accordance with Section 3A(11)(b) of Customs Directive 099 35550-065,
dated August 4, 1993, Subject: Revised Protest Directive, you are to
mail this decision, together with the Customs Form 19, to the protestant
no later than 60 days from the date of this letter. Any reliquidation of
the entry in accordance with the decision must be accomplished prior to
mailing of the decision.

Sixty days from the date of the decision, the Office of Regulations and
Rulings will make the decision available to Customs personnel, and to
the public on the Custom Home Page on the World Wide Web at

[www.customs.treas.gov.](http://www.customs.treas.gov./), by means of
the Freedom of Information Act and other methods of public distribution.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director,

Commercial Rulings Division