BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
![](media/image1.png){width="3.0694444444444446in" height="2.9125in"}

**Avoid Overexertion:**

Use caution when shoveling heavy

snow, pushing a car, or walking in

deep snow. The strain from the cold

and hard labor may cause a heart attack.

Sweating could lead to chills and

hypothermia.

**At Home and At Work...Have Available:**

-   Flashlight and extra batteries

-   Battery-powered NOAA Weather Radio and commercial radio

-   Extra food and water. High energy food that required no cooking is
    best

-   Emergency heating source, such as a fireplace or space heater with
    proper ventilation.

**In Cars and Trucks:**

-   Check and winterize your vehicle before the winter season begins

-   Carry a winter storm survival kit that includes: blankets/sleeping
    bags, extra clothing to keep dry, sand or cat litter, a shovel,
    windshield scraper and brush, tool kit, and booster cables.

**For further information, contact your county emergency management
office or Wisconsin Emergency Management at (608) 242-3232**

*Wisconsin's Winter Weather Awareness Week is coordinated by the
National Weather Service, Wisconsin Emergency Management, and local
emergency management offices*.
## JOB STEP ATTRIBUTE RATINGS DEFINITIONS

The following tables correspond to the definitions of the scales that
will be used to rate the job steps. *Please familiarize yourself with
these definitions*.

The ***Difficulty*** factor refers to the time, effort, and assistance
required to gain job step performance proficiency. The breakdown of the
scale is as follows:

  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
  **Level    *Very Difficult*: The ability to perform the job step gets
  3**        better with practice, but the job step does not get easier.
             The job step has unique activities. The job step has a lot
             of concurrent activities

  **Level    *Moderately Difficult*: The job step requires considerable
  2**        concentration effort. The job step requires considerable
             decision-making. The job step requires outside assistance or
             expertise.

  **Level    *Not Difficult*: The job step gets easier with practice. The
  1**        job step requires some concentrated practice. The job step
             requires some decision-making
  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------

The ***Importance*** factor refers to how important or critical the job
step is to overall job performance or the organization's mission or
operational requirements.

  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
  **Level    *Critical*: The cost of job step failure is very high (i.e.
  3**        safety, injury, loss of life, etc.) Job step failure may
             lead to failure to accomplish job or mission. Poor job step
             performance will cause unacceptable high damage (manpower,
             money, time, etc.). Job step failure will cripple
             performance or job steps by others.

  **Level    *Very Important*: Job step failure will hamper
  2**        accomplishment of job or mission. Poor performance will
             cause damage (money, manpower, time, etc), but will not
             cripple operations.

  **Level    *Important*: No real harm done due to poor performance. Job
  1**        or mission is not significantly affected by poor
             performance. Other operations are affected but not
             significantly.
  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------

The ***Frequency*** factor refers to how often the job step is
performed.

  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
  **Level    *Very Frequent*: Job step is performed daily or several
  3**        times a day.

  **Level    *Moderately Frequent*: Job step is performed at least once a
  2**        week.

  **Level    *Infrequent*: Job step is performed less than once a week.
  1**        
  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
> **ATTACHMENT A**
>
> **FY 2009 STATE PLAN GUIDANCE**
>
> **INTRASTATE (IFF) FUNDING FORMULA REQUIREMENTS**
>
> Each State IFF submittal must demonstrate that the requirements in
> Sections 305(a)(2)(C) have been met:
>
> OAA, Sec. 305(a)(2)
>
> "*States shall,*
>
> *(C) in consultation with area agencies, in accordance with guidelines
> issued by the Assistant Secretary, and using the best available data,
> develop and publish for review and comment a formula for distribution
> within the State of funds received under this title that takes into
> account‑‑*
>
> *(i) the geographical distribution of older individuals in the State;
> and*
>
> *(ii) the distribution among planning and service areas of older
> individuals with greatest economic need and older individuals with
> greatest social need, with particular attention to low‑income minority
> older individuals*."

-   For purposes of the IFF, "best available data" is the most recent
    census data (year 2000 or later), or more recent data of equivalent
    quality available in the State.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   As required by Section 305(d) of the OAA, the IFF revision request
    includes: a descriptive Statement; a numerical Statement; and a list
    of the data used (by planning and service area).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The request also includes information on how the proposed formula
    will affect funding to each planning and service area.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   States may use a base amount in their IFFs to ensure viable funding
    for each Area Agency but generally, a hold harmless provision is
    discouraged because it adversely affects those planning and service
    areas experiencing significant population growth.
**The objectives of this workshop were to bring together Southern
Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) biologists involved in behavioral data
collection to discuss and develop some standards for the collection of
behavioral data on this population. It was a common finding of the
recent NMFS SRKW workshops that additional rigor and standardization of
behavioral sampling methodology was desirable to support the ongoing and
upcoming research projects relating to the recovery and stabilization of
the population. The intention of the workshop was to:**

> **1) Improve understanding of the methodology required for behavioral
> research, and methods and techniques that have been accepted in other
> taxa,**
>
> **2) Clarify terminology used to describe killer whale behavior,**
>
> **3) Improve research design, data collection, and data storage
> methodology beyond improvements in coding definitions,**
>
> **4) Coordinate data collection and exchange.**

![](media/image1.jpeg){width="5.750694444444444in"
height="2.1444444444444444in"}
![](media/image1.png){width="2.875in" height="1.5in"}

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Amy Hagovsky**

**June 9, 2003 202-228-1122**

**SENATOR MIKULSKI SPONSORS ELDER FALL PREVENTION ACT TO ADDRESS
PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE SENIOR CITIZENS TO FALL**

**WASHINGTON, D.C. - Senator Barbara A. Mikulski** (D-MD) today
introduced the Elder Fall Prevention Act (S.1217), legislation to create
a public education campaign directed at seniors to help prevent falls
and reduce injury. The legislation also directs two agencies to conduct
research on ways to prevent elder falls and improve rehabilitation of
elder falls victims. Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) joined Senator Mikulski in
introducing this legislation.

"Falls don't discriminate," said Senator Mikulski, ranking Democratic
member of the Senate Subcommittee on Aging. "Everyone has a friend or
family member who has fallen. This is a serious public health problem
that directly affects our seniors and their family members. This
legislation provides a framework to reduce and prevent elder falls
through public education campaigns and important research."

This legislation authorizes \$38 million for the next three years to do
the following:

1.  **Public Education Campaign**

Federal grant money would be used to establish a three-year awareness
campaign for senior citizens, family members, and health care providers
to teach them preventative methods for elderly falls.

2.  **Research Initiative**

The legislation directs the Centers for Disease Control and the Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality to conduct research on things like:
identifying seniors who have a high risk of falling; developing better
ways of identifying the most effective ways to prevent falls; and
improving treatment and rehabilitation of elder falls victims.

3.  **Demonstration Program**

The legislation authorizes federal grants for the National Safety
Council and other organizations to conduct demonstration programs on
ways to prevent elderly falls.

4.  **Effect on Medicare and Medicaid**

Bill would require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to
evaluate the effect of falls on Medicare and Medicaid and the potential
for reducing costs by expanding services. This would include a review of
reimbursement policies and if additional fall- related education,
prevention, and early intervention services should be covered.

One out of every three adults over 65 falls every year. Falls are the
leading cause of injury deaths among persons over 65 and are the leading
cause of doctor visits, hospital admissions, and emergency room visits.
In 2000, falls among elderly persons accounted for 10,200 deaths and 1.6
million emergency room visits.

\# \# \#
**Florida Panhandle**

**Constituency**

**Meeting**

***Wednesday 19 Jul 2006***

**0830 -- 0900 Early Arrival Coffee and Doughnuts**

**0900 -- 0905 Administration and Introductions**

**0905 -- 0915 NWS -- Southern Region**

**( Ben Weiger, Hydrologic Services Branch Chief )**

**0915 -- 1000 NWS -- Southeast River Forecast Center**

**( Jeff Dobur, Senior Hydrologist )**

**( Jack Bushong, Hydrometeorological Analysis and Support )**

**1000 -- 1015 NWS -- WFO Tallahassee**

**( Joel Lanier, Senior Service Hydrologist )**

**1015 -- 1030 Break**

**1030 -- 1045 USGS Tallahassee**

**( Richard Verdi, Hydrologist )**

**1045 -- 1115 USACE Mobile District**

**( Cheryl Hrabovsky, Water Mgmt. Section )**

**1115 -- 1130 Florida Emergency Operations Center**

**( Bryan Richardson, Assistant State Meteorologist )**

**1130 -- 1145 Red Cross**

**( Chris Floyd, Emergency Services Director**

> **- Capital Area Chapter ARC )**

**1145 -- 1230 EM Open Discussion / Questions / Share / Show & Tell**

**1230 -- 1300 Hurricane Safe House Demonstration -- Red Cross Exhibit**

**1300 -- 1400 Lunch**

**1400 Home Depot - Tallahassee, FL (Capital Circle NW)**

> **-- Public Outreach Booth**
>
> **Hurricane Safe House Demonstration -- Red Cross Exhibit**

***USGS Tallahassee***

***Location Map***

U.S. Geological Survey\
Water Resources Discipline\
2010 Levy Avenue\
Tallahassee, Florida 32310

The office is located in Innovation Park near Florida State University:

From I-10, go south on Monroe Street.

Turn right (west) on W. Gaines St,

Turn left (ie south) on Lake Bradford Road.

Turn right on Levy Ave and proceed to the USGS.

Please see the next page for additional map details.

![](media/image1.png){width="5.072916666666667in"
height="3.8645833333333335in"}

![](media/image2.png){width="3.8777777777777778in" height="4.4375in"}

*Home Depot -- Capital Circle NW -- Tallahasse, FL*

![](media/image3.png){width="5.915972222222222in"
height="4.514583333333333in"}
**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION**

**445 Twelfth Street, S.W.**.

**WASHINGTON DC 20554**

**MASS MEDIA BUREAU PROCESSING ENGINEER:** Ann Gallagher

**AUDIO SERVICES DIVISION TELEPHONE**: (202) 418-2700

**TECHNICAL PROCESSING GROUP FACSIMILE**: (202) 418-1411

**APPLICATION STATUS**: (202) 418-2730 **MAIL STOP**: 1800B3

**HOME PAGE**: www.fcc.gov/mmb/asd/ **INTERNET ADDRESS**:
agallagh@fcc.gov

## 

## January 10, 2000

Kathryn R. Schmeltzer, Esquire

Fisher Wayland Cooper Leader and

Zaragoza L.L.P.

2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 400

Washington, DC 20006-1851

In re: WCBM (AM), Baltimore, MD

File No. BP-971222AC

Fac. ID No. 4759

> WWTL (AM), Walkersville, MD
>
> File No. BP-960829AA
>
> Fac. ID No. 19235
>
> WMXV (AM) \[formerly WCHO\]
>
> Washington Court House, OH
>
> File No. BP-971222AB
>
> Fac. ID No. 57355

Dear Counsel:

This letter concerns the above-referenced application for major
modification to the facility of WCBM (AM), Baltimore, Maryland, filed by
WCBM Maryland, Inc. In response to the December 15, 1999 letter to the
parties in MX Group AM2, on December 29 you submitted an amendment
removing the conflict between WCBM's proposed facility and the
above-referenced application for major modification to the facility of
WWTL (AM) , Walkersville, Maryland, filed by Elijah Broadcasting
Corporation. Accordingly, this letter is to notify you that WCBM (AM) is
removed from the group of mutually exclusive applications shown above,
and will not be subject to auction. The *Motion to Defer Auction and
Request for Immediate Ruling* filed December 22, 1999 on behalf of WCBM
is therefore dismissed as moot.

> Sincerely,

Linda Blair, Chief

Audio Services Division

Mass Media Bureau

Cc: Lauren A. Colby, Esq.

Marissa G. Repp, Esq.

Richard J. Bodorff, Esq.
![](media/image1.png){width="1.5208333333333333in"
height="0.7791666666666667in"}![](media/image2.emf)

![](media/image3.wmf)

![](media/image4.wmf)

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:**

April 16, 2001 Gary Korzan - (605) 352-1142 Patrick Gross - (605)
624-7060 or

\- (605) 352-1100

**[USDA ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF \$4.5 MILLION TO PROMOTE CO-OP
DEVELOPMENT]{.underline}**

HURON - The U.S. Department of Agriculture today invited preapplications
for \$4.5 million in grants to encourage the development of new,
member-owned cooperatives. The funding is being provided by the Rural
Cooperative Development Grant program of USDA Rural Development.

The grants will be awarded on a competitive basis to nonprofit
corporations and institutions of higher learning, for use in helping
organize new rural business cooperatives. The funds may be used to
finance feasibility studies and other "hands-on" technical assistance
activities required for successful cooperative development.

Of the \$4.5 million, \$1.5 million is reserved for efforts assisting
small, minority producers whose governing boards or memberships are
comprised of at least 75 percent minorities.

The deadline for receipt of preapplications is May 24, 2001.
Preapplications should be sent to the USDA Rural Development state
office serving the state in which the project will be headquartered.

Information on the program is available from South Dakota\'s USDA Rural
Development state office by contacting Gary Korzan or Robert Bothwell at
(605) 352-1142. Further information is available by contacting one of
our ten office locations in Aberdeen, Huron, Watertown, Mitchell, Sioux
Falls, Vermillion, Yankton, Rapid City, Pierre and Sturgis, or by
visiting the following web address:
<http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/sd>[.]{.underline}

**-USDA-**

*The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits
discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,
color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political
beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means for communication of program information
(Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA\'s TARGET
Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of
discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room
326-W, Whitten Building, 14^th^ and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington,
DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal
opportunity employer.*
***Disaster News***![](media/image1.png){width="1.5847222222222221in"
height="0.7277777777777777in"}

***Economic Injury Loans for Small Businesses***

SBA Disaster Assistance--Field Operations Center East-One Baltimore
Place, Suite 300-Atlanta, GA 30308

**Release Date:** November 20, 2007 **Contact:** Kathy Cook

**Release Number:** 08-104, NY 11096 **Phone:** 404-347-3771

**SBA DISASTER LOANS AVAILABLE IN NEW YORK FOLLOWING**

**SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE DISASTER DECLARATION**

**ATLANTA -** The U.S. Small Business Administration announces today
that federal disaster loans are available to small businesses located in
the counties of Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, Livingston,
Steuben and Wyoming in the State of New York as a result of drought that
occurred June 1, 2007 and continuing.

"When the Secretary of Agriculture issues a disaster declaration to help
farmers recover from damages and losses to crops, the Small Business
Administration issues a declaration to assist small businesses affected
by the same disaster," said Frank Skaggs, Director of SBA Field
Operations Center East.

Under this declaration, SBA's Economic Injury Disaster Loan program is
available to farm-related and nonfarm-related small business concerns
and small agricultural cooperatives that suffered financial losses as a
direct result of this disaster. Farmers and ranchers are not eligible to
apply to the SBA but nurseries are eligible to apply for economic injury
disaster loans for losses caused by drought conditions.

Eligible small businesses may qualify for loans up to \$1.5 million.
These loans are available at a 4 percent interest rate with terms up to
30 years. SBA determines eligibility for the program based on the size
and type of business and its financial resources. Loan amounts and terms
are set by the SBA and are based upon each applicant's financial
condition. Under this disaster declaration, the SBA cannot provide loans
to agricultural producers.

Interested business owners should contact SBA's Customer Service Center
by calling 1-800-659-2955\
(1-800-877-8339 for the hearing-impaired) Monday through Friday from 8
a.m. to 9 p.m. EST. Loan applications can also be downloaded from
[www.sba.gov](http://www.sba.gov/). Completed applications should be
mailed to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

**Completed loan applications must be returned to SBA no later than
[July 7, 2008]{.underline}.**

\# \# \#

***For more information about the SBA's Disaster Loan Programs, visit
our website at*** [www.sba.gov](http://www.sba.gov/)*.*
**INSTRUCTIONS:**

1.  This request form must be used for materials originally submitted as
    a consult (e.g., patient has no NIH medical record, or patient has
    not enrolled in an NIH protocol). All other requests should be
    submitted to the Medical Records Department, using form NIH-527.
    Call (301) 496-3331 or (888) 790-2133 for more information.

2.  Please complete a separate form for each requestor.

3.  Complete this form in its entirety and forward via FAX to (301)
    402-2415 or to the address below:

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE

> LABORATORY OF PATHOLOGY,
>
> ATTN: HEMATOPATHOLOGY SECTION

10 CENTER DRIVE, MSC 1516 BLDG 10, ROOM 2N202

BETHESDA, MD 20892-1192

TELEPHONE: (301) 496-0183

**IDENTIFYING INFORMATION:**

  -------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------
  Patient Name                           Daytime          Date of Birth
                                         Telephone        

  Address                                                 

  City State Zip Code Country                             
  -------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------

**RELEASE INFORMATION TO:**

  -------------------------------------------------- --------------------
  Name                                               Telephone

  Address                                            Fax Number

  City State Zip Code Country                        
  -------------------------------------------------- --------------------

Date Range of Information to be Released: from to [\_\_
\_\_]{.underline}

(month/year) (month/year)

Please check specific information to be released:

Pathology Tissue Exam Reports Tissue Slides & Pathology Tissue Exam
Reports

Other (Please Specify):

**AUTHORIZATION:** Permission is hereby granted to the Warren Grant
Magnuson Clinical Center and the National Cancer Institute to release
medical information to the individual/organization as identified above.
I certify that I am the individual authorized to sign this form and
understand that the knowing and willful request for or acquisition of a
record (or materials with patient's identification) pertaining to an
individual under false pretenses is criminal offense under the Privacy
Act (Title 45, Part 5b) subject to a \$5,000 fine.

*(Note: submission of this form authorizes the release of the
information specified within one year from date of signature.)*

  -------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------
  Patient/Authorized Signature           Print Name         Date

  -------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------

If other than patient, specify relationship:
ESD's Log for Safety Walkthroughs of Lab/Shop Space by LLPI (monthly)
and Department Head (semi-annually)

**Please keep log in Lab Safety Primer or post near door**

Any findings/corrective actions that cannot be corrected within 24 hours
must be entered into CATS ([www.lbl.gov](http://www.lbl.gov/), 'A-Z
Index', 'CATS (Corrective Action Tracking System)') by you, or by
Division Safety Coordinator.

+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
| **Date**   | *          | **Were there                 | **Date     |
|            | *Inspected | findings/corrective actions  | Corrective |
|            | by:**      | (see checklist)?**           | Actions    |
|            |            |                              | C          |
|            |            | **(yes/no)**                 | ompleted** |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
|            |            |                              |            |
+------------+------------+------------------------------+------------+
Number range CHAPTERPublication--National Ocean Service--U.S. Coast
Pilot 9, Pacific and Arctic Coasts Alaska: Cape Spencer to Beaufort Sea,
2008 (26^th^) Edition. Change No. 04.

Coast Pilot 9 26^th^ Ed 2008 Corrections

Page 140-Paragraph 182, lines 7-8; read:

prominent, **Point Bentinck Light** (60°23\'32\"N., 146°05\'31\"W.), 47
feet above the water, is shown from a ...

(25/08 CG17; LL/07)

Page 143-Paragraph 226, line 5; read:

vapor-laden airs of the Gulf of Alaska causes changeable weather; sudden
wind squalls and thick fogs are common.

(CP 9/07)

Page 320-Paragraph 439, line 3; read:

yards off the point. A 9½-fathom shoal is 1.7 miles NW ...

(DD 11507; H 11581)
# Before the

# Federal Communications Commission

# Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of )

)

Amendment of the Commission's Rules ) WT Docket No. 97-81

Regarding Multiple Address Systems )

# ERRATUM

**Released: June 21, 2001**

By the Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:

1\. This erratum amends the Multiple Address Systems (MAS) *Memorandum
Opinion and Order*, released on May 29, 2001. *See* Amendment of the
Commission's Rules Regarding Multiple Address Systems, WT Docket No.
97-81, *Memorandum Opinion and Order*, FCC No. 01-171 (rel. May 29,
2001).

2\. Paragraph 33 of the *MAS Memorandum Opinion and Order* is revised to
replace "Additionally, we are making editorial amendments to Section
101.107 of our Rules to conform them with our decisions in the *MAS
R&O*, thereby, clarifying the permissible frequency tolerance levels for
MAS operations. Specifically, we will make appropriate changes to the
frequency tolerance levels denoted in the table contained in Section
101.107(a), as well as, indicate that such levels are applicable to all
(928/952/956 MHz, 928/959 MHz, 932/941 MHz) of the MAS bands. We
consider these revisions to be non-substantive in nature and in the
public interest as they will facilitate our efforts to address the
concerns raised in the CICC petition with respect to mitigating
instances of interference to MAS systems." with "Additionally, we are
making editorial amendments to Section 101.107 of our Rules to conform
them with our decisions in the *MAS R&O.* We consider these revisions to
be non-substantive in nature and in the public interest as they clarify
our intent with respect to this service."

3\. Appendix B -- Final Rules of the *MAS Memorandum Opinion and Order*
is corrected as follows:

(a) Section 101.107(a) is amended by revising the table and revising
    footnotes (5) and (7) to read as follows:

**§ 101.107 Frequency tolerance.**

\(a\) \* \* \*

Frequency Tolerance (percent)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Frequency (MHz) All fixed Mobile Mobile

and base stations stations 3

stations over 3 watts or

watts less

928 to 929 (2)(5) 0.0005 ......... .........

932 to 932.5 (2)(5) 0.00015 ......... .........

\* \* \* \* \* \* \*

\* \* \* \* \*

\(5\) Used for remote stations. For remotes with 12.5 KHz bandwidth or
less, the tolerance is ±0.00015%. Remote mobiles are only allowed in the
portion of the 932-932.5 MHz band that is licensed by geographic area.

\* \* \*

\(7\) For private operational fixed point-to-point microwave systems,
with a channel greater than or equal to 50 KHz bandwidth, ±0.0005%; for
multiple address master stations, regardless of bandwidth, ±0.00015%;
for multiple address remote stations with 12.5 KHz bandwidths or less,
±0.00015%; for multiple address remote stations with channels greater
than 12.5 KHz bandwidth, ±0.0005%.

\* \* \* \* \*

> **FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATION**
>
> Ramona E. Melson
>
> Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division
>
> Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:**

Tammi Schone - (605) 352-1102

**[HOMEOWNERSHIP...ARTISTIC TALENTS PUT TO GOOD USE]{.underline}**

**(Sturgis, South Dakota -- June 20, 2006)** Robert and Karen Jordan
were looking to move out of their trailer house and into an affordable
home that would be large enough for their family. The Jordan's attended
Neighborhood Housing Services "Living Within One's Means" and homebuyer
classes prior to submitting an application to USDA Rural Development.

Because the family met the program income limits and had a good credit
history, Rural Development was able to assist the family with a 502
direct loan. An opportunity for the American dream presented itself with
spacious living, a sense of pride, ownership, and allowing them to 'own
their future'. The Jordan's purchased a lot, built a foundation, and
moved a house on to it from the Ellsworth Air Force Base. The Jordan's
worked for approximately a year on the structure to make it livable.
Karen enjoyed fixing up the house has it provided her with the
opportunity to decorate and utilize her artistic talents throughout the
house.

"There is much less stress on the kids now that they have their own
room/space," Karen said. Robert said, "The home has provided us with
something to work towards and has made us a closer knit family." The
Jordan's found the assistance they received from the Sturgis Rural
Development office to be great and felt they had been assisted promptly
and guided through the application process right up to closing.

The Jordan's aren't thinking about what they can accomplish someday,
that someday is here with finding a house to call their own. When Tanner
was asked about what this home means to him, he stated, "I have my own
room and my little brother can't mess with my stuff!"

USDA Rural Development has ten offices in the state that assist rural
communities.  Office locations include a state office in Huron, along
with area offices in Aberdeen, Huron, Mitchell, Pierre, Rapid City,
Sioux Falls, Sturgis, Watertown, and Yankton.

 

USDA Rural Development's mission is to deliver programs in a way that
will support increasing economic opportunity and improve the quality of
life of rural residents.  As a venture capital entity, Rural Development
provides equity and technical assistance to finance and foster growth in
homeownership, business development, and critical community and
technology infrastructure.  Further information on rural programs is
available at a local USDA Rural Development office or by visiting USDA's
web site at <http://www/rurdev.usda.gov>.

**- USDA -**
**EMI Higher Education Project**

**Emergency Management Body of Knowledge Project**

**Core Reading List Fro Emergency Managers**

**Associate Degrees and Stand Alone Certificates Programs**

We received 16 responses from the 26 colleges contacted. A lot of the
feed back that we received from the folks that we talked to was that
their programs were very new and it was hard to give us feed back. None
could give us a list of 50. The most was 25.

The numbers behind the document is the number of times it was mentioned.

FEMA IS (5)

Introduction to Emergency Management- Haddow/Bullock (4)

NIMS (6)

Journal of Emergency Management (3)

Living with Hazards Dealing with Disasters (2)

National Response Plan (4)

Red Cross educational materials (2)

NFPA 1600 (2)

Continuity of Business

Disaster Management and Preparedness

Emergency Manager; publication of Georgia Emergency Management Agency

Georgia (State) Emergency Operations Plans

Hazard Material; Managing the Incident

History of Emergency Management-Blanchard

Homeland Protection

Illinois Emergency Management Agency's Administrative Rules book

Incident Management

International Association of Emergency Manager's newsletter

Jane Smith

Keeping the Wolves at Bay, A media Relations Guide

Mass Causality and High-Impact Incidents-Christen/Maniscalco

Media Relations for Public Safety Professionals

National Information officer's Association newsletter

NYSEMO course materials

Principles Emergency Planning and Management

The public information's officer's text Philip Politano is writing for
Prentice Hall

Search and Rescue Fundamentals

State regulations for the state in which they work
PUBLIC NOTICE![](media/image1.png){width="0.49375in"
height="0.5291666666666667in"}

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12th St. SW

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554

News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet:
http://www.fcc.gov

DA 01-1369

Released: June 6, 2001

VOICE OVER IP NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY

AN OET TUTORIAL

The Office of Engineering and Technology will provide a tutorial on
voice over the Internet on Friday, June 15, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30
p.m. at the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Room
TW‑C305, Washington, D.C The presentation will cover next generation
networks based on VoIP, including soft switches, media gateways, media
servers, VoIP standardization status, and market drivers of VoIP
technologies.

The presenter, Dr. M. Niel Ransom, is Chief Technology Officer for
Alcatel USA**.** Previously Dr. Ransom was Alcatel's Vice President &
General Manager of Advanced Systems and Vice President and General
Manager of Local Networks. Before that, Dr. Ransom worked for Bell South
as Senior Director of Advanced Technology subsequent to having worked at
Bell Laboratories as Technical Manager for Exploratory Development. Dr.
Ransom has received numerous honors, is widely published and has been
granted three patents for advanced telecommunications technologies. Dr.
Ransom holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of
Notre Dame.

Members of the public may attend the presentation, and every effort will
be made to accommodate as many people as possible. Admittance, however,
will be limited to the seating available in the Commission meeting room.
Please allow sufficient time for clearance through Commission security
before the presentation begins. For additional information, contact Kent
Nilsson at 202-418-0845 (e-mail: knilsson@fcc.gov).
# COMMISSIONER FURCHTGOTT-ROTH RENEWS CALL FOR C BLOCK DELAY

Friday's decision in *GWI PCS 1 et al v. United States,* Case No.
99-11294 (5^th^ Cir. October 20, 2000) creates yet another twist in the
long road traveled by the Commission's C Block licensees. The Court's
decision to "respectfully disagree" on a number of issues with the
Second Circuit's decision in Nextwave[^1] casts renewed doubt on the
proper scope of the Communications Act on the one hand and the
Bankruptcy code on the other. I continue to believe the C Block
re-auction currently scheduled for December 12, 2000 should be delayed
until the legal cloud surrounding these licenses dissipates. As I
indicated in early September, "\[w\]e should not endeavor to rush into a
re-auction that may only exacerbate the already vast troubles suffered
by all parties concerned."[^2] The Fifth Circuit's decision does not
alter my view; in fact, Friday's decision serves to emphasize that the
litigation regarding this issue is not yet final. In the current legal
environment, a C Block re-auction would be a risky proposition. After
all the challenges faced by the C Block, it is not a risk I am willing
to take.

\# \# \#

For more information regarding this release please contact Bryan Tramont
202-418-2000 or <Btramont@fcc.gov>.

[^1]: See In re: NextWave Personal Communications Inc., 200 F.3d 43 (2d
    Cir. 1999)(per curiam), cert. denied, No. 99-1980 (U.S. Oct. 10.,
    2000).

[^2]: See Separate Statement Of Commissioner Harold Furchtgott-Roth in
    re Public Notice DA 00-49, Auction of C and F Block Broadband PCS
    Licenses, Nextwave Petition for Reconsideration, Order on
    Reconsideration (rel. September 6, 2000).
## STA Quality Improvement Council Quality Assurance Review Planning Worksheet

1.  What is the work process to be reviewed?

> *Hydraulic Design*

2.  Has this process been selected for review because of an identified
    quality concern, or because this process was due for review, or
    both?

> *Both*

3.  If there is a quality concern, what is it?

> *Lack of consistency in plans.*\
> *Lack of expertise within STA.*

4.  Who are the users of the output of this process?

> *Project Designers, Bridge Designers, Project Engineers, Contractors,
> Maintenance.*

5.  Who is the person accountable for the process and who has the
    authority and expertise to develop and implement changes to this
    process?

> *\..... & Regions*

6.  Please respond to one of the two following options:

> **OPTION A**- This review will look at the entire work process from
> beginning to end.
>
> Option B has been selected.
>
> **OPTION B**- This review will look at key elements of the process and
> not the entire process.
>
> Key elements to be reviewed: *Preliminary Design*
>
> What are the beginning and ending steps for each of the key elements
> to be reviewed?
>
> *Prelim. Design: **Beginning:** Scoping **End:** FIR*

7.  Where is the process documented?

> *Hydraulics Manual & Project Development Manual; Bridge Design Manual;
> Design Manual; FEMA*

8.  Are there other documents that contain standards, guidelines and/or
    quality expectations for this process and its output?

> *AASHTO, Urban Drainage Regulations, Federal Hydraulics Circular,
> various city and county regulations.*

9.  Who is the lead reviewer for this QAR?

> *\....- Co-leaders*

10. Who are the other members of the review team? (If any)

> *\..... - Bridge\
> \..... - FHWA\
> STA Bridge Staff\
> Region Hydraulics person*

11. What is the schedule for this QAR?

> *Team assembled: Nov. 30, 2000\
> Reviews conducted: Dec. 1 - Jan. 31, 2001.\
> Report completed: Feb. 28, 2001*

12. Who will attend these activities, besides the review team?

> *Region Hydraulics Engineer, Region Access Coordinator, Region
> Envrionmental Manager, a Design Consultant.*

13. What will be the distribution of the QAR report?

> *Resident Engineers, Program Engineers, Hydraulics Engineers, QIC*
>
>
#### Appendix C. 1 International Organizations

The following have been determined to be eligible to use GSA sources of
supply and services, in addition to the organizations listed in
appendixes A and B.  This list is not all-inclusive; other activities
may also be eligible to use GSA sources.  Also, as stated in par.
7e.(3), certain entities may be eligible to use only specific GSA
sources and/or services.  GSA will rule upon the eligibility of
activities on a case-by-case basis in response to requests received (see
GSA Order, par. 11).

African Development Fund\
American Red Cross\
Asian Development Bank\
Caribbean Organization\
Counterpart Foundation, Inc.\
Customs Cooperation Council\
European Space Research Organization\
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations\
Great Lakes Fishery Commission\
Inter-American Defense Board\
Inter-American Development Bank\
Inter-American Institute of Agriculture Sciences\
Inter-American Investment Corporation\
Inter-American Statistical Institute\
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission\
Intergovernmental Maritime Consultive Organization\
Intergovernmental Committee for European Migration\
International Atomic Energy Agency\
International Bank of Reconstruction and Development (WORLD BANK)\
International Boundary Commission-United States and Canada\
International Boundary and Water Commission-United States and Mexico\
International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes\
International Civil Aviation Organization\
International Coffee Organization\
International Cotton Advisory Committee\
International Development Association\
International Fertilizer Development Center\
International Finance Corporation\
International Hydrographic Bureau\
International Institute for Cotton\
International Joint Commission-United States and Canada\
International Labor Organization\
International Maritime Satellite Organization\
International Monetary Fund\
International Pacific Halibut Commission\
International Pacific Salmon Fisheries Commission-Canada\
International Secretariat for Volunteer Services\
International Telecommunications Satellite Organization\
International Telecommunications Union\
International Wheat Council\
Lake Ontario Claims Tribunal\
Multinational Force and Observers\
Multinational Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)\
North American Treaty Organization (NATO)\
Organization of African Unity\
Organization of American States\
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development\
Pan American Health Organization\
Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics\
South Pacific Commission\
United International Bureau for the Protection of Intellectual Property\
United Nations\
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization\
Universal Postal Union\
World Health Organization\
World Intellectual Property Organization\
World Meteorological Organization\
World Tourism Organization
**Subpart C --- Commencement and Perfection of Appeal**

**§20.200 Rule 200. What constitutes an appeal.**

An appeal consists of a timely filed Notice of Disagreement in writing
and, after a Statement of the Case has been furnished, a timely filed
Substantive Appeal. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105)

**§20.201 Rule 201. Notice of Disagreement.**

A written communication from a claimant or his or her representative
expressing dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative
determination by the agency of original jurisdiction and a desire to
contest the result will constitute a Notice of Disagreement. While
special wording is not required, the Notice of Disagreement must be in
terms which can be reasonably construed as disagreement with that
determination and a desire for appellate review. If the agency of
original jurisdiction gave notice that adjudicative determinations were
made on several issues at the same time, the specific determinations
with which the claimant disagrees must be identified. For example, if
service connection was denied for two disabilities and the claimant
wishes to appeal the denial of service connection with respect to only
one of the disabilities, the Notice of Disagreement must make that
clear. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7105)
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

H O U S I N G

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Special Attention of: Notice 94-40 (HUD)

Regional Directors of Housing

Field Office Directors Issued: 05/26/94

of Housing Management Expires: 05/31/95

Field Office Chiefs
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

of Loan Management Cross References:

Field Office Chief

of Property Offices

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Subject: Supplemental Claims

This Notice provides guidance for Field Offices when

mortgagees request written approval to submit more than one

supplemental claim for the same case that does not meet one

of the exceptions set forth in Mortgagee Letter 94-24,

dated 5/26/94.

Mortgagees have been advised that these requests should

be few. Headquarters believes that the number of requests

deserving Field Offices approval should be rare. However, when

a Field Office receives a request from a mortgagee to submit an

additional supplemental claim, it must be reviewed and a decision

made. The Field Office should make sure that:

\(1\) the request is in writing,

\(2\) the documentation provided is sufficient to carefully

review and make an appropriate decision to allow the

mortgagee to obtain reimbursement of expenses which are

permitted under the regulations, and

\(3\) a response to the mortgagee\'s request is given within

five (5) business days.

Questions pertaining to this Notice may be directed to the

Single Family Mortgage Insurance Claims Branch at (202) 708-1086

or the Single Family Insured Servicing Branch at (202) 708-1719.

Sincerely yours,

Nicolas P. Retsinas

Assistant Secretary for Housing

\- Federal Housing Commissioner

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

: Distribution: W-3-1,

Previous Editions Are Obsolete HUD 21B (3-80)

GPO 871 902
> ![](media/image1.wmf) FAA WILLIAM J. HUGHES

TECHNICAL CENTER

#  AWARD NOTIFICATION

AWARDED TO (ADDRESS):

Wichita State University

1845 Fairmount

Wichita, Kansas 67260

DATE OF AWARD:

8/28/08

CONTRACT OR GRANT AMOUNT:

\$50,000.00

**CONTRACT AWARD NO.:**

**     **

**GRANT AWARD NO.:**

08-G-013

GRANT OR CONTRACT PERFORMANCE PERIOD (DURATION):

7 months

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:

Wichita, Kansas

SUMMARY OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED:

The purpose of this research program is to continue to collect pertinent
demographic data related to the General Aviation fleet for future risk
assessment, particularly pertaining to aging aircraft issues.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (OPTIONS-TIME AND DOLLARS,
IMPORTANCE/SIGNIFICANCE):

     

**NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF THE**

**CONTRACTING OFFICER:**

     

**NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF THE GRANTS OFFICER:**

**Michael Latyn, 609-485-6336     **

**ROUTING SYMBOL OF THE REQUISITIONING ORGANIZATION: AJP-7950**

**Note: If a Grant, please fill out the appropriate Grants information.
If a Contract, please fill out the appropriate Contracts information.**

**Please complete the following information for Grants:**

**PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (P/I) (NAME, PHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL
ADDRESS):**

**Dr. John Tomblin 316-978-6427. john.tomblin@wichita.edu**

**FAA TECHNICAL MONITOR (NAME, ORGANIZATION, PHONE NUMBER AND**

**E-MAIL ADDRESS: Felix Abali 609-485-7549**

**TITLE OF GRANT: \"Demographics Study of General Aviation Fleet Part
II\"**

**GRANT COMPLETION DATE: 4/30/09**
\<@37\>Handsboro Series

\<@33\>\<i\>*Depth class:*\<p\> Very deep

\<@33\>\<i\>*Drainage class:*\<p\> Very poorly drained

\<@33\>\<i\>*Permeability:*\<p\> Moderate

\<@33\>\<i\>*Parent material:*\<p\> Thick accumulations of herbaceous
plant remains and the underlying mineral sediments

\<@33\>\<i\>*Landform:*\<p\> Salt marshes

\<@33\>\<i\>*Slope:*\<p\> 0 to 1 percent

\<@33\>\<i\>*Taxonomic class:*\<p\> Euic, thermic Typic Sulfihemists

\<@27\>Commonly Associated Soils

\<@30\>Axis and Maurepas soils are commonly associated with the
Handsboro series.

-   \<@49\>The Axis soils are in positions similar to those of the
    Handsboro soils and do not have a thick organic epipedon.

-   \<@29\>The Maurepas soils are in backswamps and do not have mineral
    layers in the upper part.

\<@27\>Typical Pedon

\<@30\>Handsboro mucky silt loam, frequently flooded; about 75 feet
north of Crooked Bayou; 500 feet north and 800 feet east of the
southwest corner of sec. 6., T. 8 S., R. 4 W.

\<@23\>A---0 to 4 inches; olive gray (5Y 4/2) mucky silt loam; massive;
very fluid; many fine and common medium roots; moderately alkaline, wet;
clear smooth boundary.

\<@33\>Oa1---4 to 16 inches; muck, dark olive gray (5Y 3/2) broken and
rubbed; massive; very fluid; many medium and common fine roots;
moderately alkaline, wet; clear smooth boundary.

\<@33\>Oa2---16 to 26 inches; muck, dark olive gray (5Y 3/2) rubbed;
massive; very fluid; common fine and few medium roots; moderately
alkaline, wet; abrupt smooth boundary.

\<@33\>Cg---26 to 28 inches; very dark grayish brown (2.5Y 3/2) sandy
loam; massive; slightly fluid; common fine roots; moderately alkaline,
wet; abrupt smooth boundary.

\<@33\>O´a1---28 to 46 inches; muck, dark olive gray (5Y 3/2) rubbed;
about 50 percent fibers; massive; very fluid; common fine roots; common
fine sand grains; moderately alkaline, wet; gradual smooth boundary.

\<@33\>O´a2---46 to 52 inches; muck, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) rubbed;
massive; very fluid; few medium roots; moderately alkaline, wet; abrupt
smooth boundary.

\<@33\>C´g1---52 to 56 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) sandy loam;
massive; very fluid; moderately alkaline, wet; gradual smooth boundary.

\<@33\>C´g2---56 to 62 inches; very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2) sandy
loam; massive; slightly fluid; moderately alkaline, wet.

\<@27\>Range in Characteristics

\<@33\>\<i\>*Reaction:*\<p\> Neutral to moderately alkaline, wet,
throughout the profile

\<@23\>\<i\>*A horizon:*\<p\>

\<@31\>Color---hue of 10YR to 5Y, value of 2 to 4, and chroma of 1 or 2

\<@23\>\<i\>*Oa and O´a tiers:*\<p\>

\<@31\>Color---hue of 10YR to 5Y, value of 2 to 4, and chroma of 1 or 2

\<@31\>Texture---muck

\<@23\>\<i\>*Cg and C´g horizons:*\<p\>

\<@31\>Color---hue of 10YR to 5Y, value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1 or 2

\<@31\>Texture---sandy loam, loam, or silt loam