**[NASA Office of Earth Science -- Applications Program]{.smallcaps}**

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

*Community Disaster Preparedness*

*(Disaster Management)*

*Program Plan*

***Program Plan: FY2003-FY2008***

![](media/image1.wmf){width="1.1902777777777778in"
height="0.9840277777777777in"}*Science for Society*

> *Accelerating the realization of economic*
>
> *and societal benefits from Earth science,*
>
> *information, and technology ...*

**Disaster Management**

*Program Plan: FY 2003-FY2008*

**I. Purpose and Scope**

[ESE & Applications Program]{.underline}

The purpose of NASA's Earth Science Enterprise (ESE) is to increase our
knowledge of the Earth system, including its response to natural and
human-induced changes to enable improved predictions of climate,
weather, and natural hazards. ESE and the Applications Program serve
NASA and Society by expanding and accelerating the realization of
societal and economic benefits from Earth science, information, and
technology research and development.

The overarching goal of the Applications Program is to bridge the gap
between Earth science research results and the adoption of data and
prediction capabilities for reliable and sustained use in decision
support. Our approach is to employ system-engineering capacity in
support of "completing the information cycle" and to connect the
research domain and the operational domain associated with Earth science
and remote sensing technologies.

The Enterprise works through partnerships with public, academic, and
private organizations to develop innovative approaches for using Earth
science information and technology. The Applications Program enhances
the availability, interoperability, and utility of Enterprise and
private sector data sets, communications, computing, and modeling
capabilities to serve specific national applications.

Overall, the approach is to enable the assimilation of Earth science
data and model outputs to serve as inputs to decision support tools and
assessments. The outcomes and impacts are manifest in enhanced decision
support and the social and economic benefits gained through improved
decision making, public information, and efficient and effective
management.

[National Application - Community Disaster Preparedness
(CDP)]{.underline}

This National Application partners with organizations, especially
Federal and private-sector organizations, with appropriate information
infrastructure to apply NASA data and models. These partners own and
operate DSS for their policy, analysis and management responsibilities.

The CDP Program supports the national applications by providing the
partners with opportunities to enhance their DSS. A challenge is to
integrate copious volumes of data with computationally demanding
scientific models in order to produce and package products that
operational users can accommodate in their systems for analysis and
decision making. DSS provide systematic mechanisms to handle the volumes
of data, incorporate model outputs and predictions, and benchmark the
value of the products.

The Enterprise Applications Program employs functional steps of
Applications Research, Verification & Validation, and Benchmarking in
its systematic approach to bridge the gaps between the research and
operational domains.

> *Applications Research*: Evaluate the requirements and technical
> feasibility of Earth science data and models, information products,
> and predictions in partners' operational decision support needs.
>
> *Verification & Validation*: Measure the performance characteristics
> of data, information, models, and predictions to meet requirements for
> the applications.
>
> *Benchmark*: Enable the adaptation and adoption of geospatial
> information and methods derived from Earth science results to serve
> decision support

The desired outcome of the national applications is for the partner
organization to use the project results, such as guidelines and
prototypes and procedures, as benchmarks for operational use and enhance
their management and decision-making capabilities with appropriate Earth
science products and tools.

The following Program Plan describes the activities for a systematic
approach to evaluate, verify, benchmark, and extend the use of Earth
Science knowledge, data, and technology to support our partners'
decision support tools and management responsibilities. This plan
utilizes the reporting criteria of the OMB GPRA that states.

> In carrying out the provisions of section 1105(a)(29), the Director of
> the Office of Management and Budget shall require each agency to
> prepare an annual performance plan covering each program activity set
> forth in the budget of such agency. Such plan shall\--

1.  establish performance goals to define the level of performance to be
    achieved by a program activity;

2.  express such goals in an objective, quantifiable, and measurable
    form unless authorized to be in an alternative form under subsection
    (b);

3.  briefly describe the operational processes, skills and technology,
    and the human, capital, information, or other resources required to
    meet the performance goals;

4.  establish performance indicators to be used in measuring or
    assessing the relevant outputs, service levels, and outcomes of each
    program activity;

5.  provide a basis for comparing actual program results with the
    established performance goals; and

6.  describe the means to be used to verify and validate measured
    values.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  **Description of the Specific National Application or Other
    Applications Element**

The goal of CDP Program is to provide the NASA Earth Science
Applications Theme with systems engineering support that leads to
scalable, systemic, and sustainable solutions and processes that
contribute to the success of the mission, goals and objectives of the
Earth Science Applications Program.

The objective of the CDP Program is to enable and support the purpose of
the Earth Science national applications as they develop and move
specific assessments, (DSSs), and workforce development & outreach
programs from research to operations.

The desired impact for the resulting prototypes, processes, and
documentation is for the partner organizations and their customers to
derive value from the benefits of the operational use of Earth science
in serving their decision-making processes.

The CDP Disaster Management program is divided into 7 program or theme
areas. There may be significant overlap between program activities. Each
application is supported by individual applications research
initiatives, grants, and research proposals. Earthquakes, Volcanic
Eruptions, Wildfires, Floods, Hurricanes, Climate Change, and Drought

Over 100 projects have been sponsored through the NASA Research
Announcement (NRA) process in the past. The results of these projects
are continually being fed to agency partners so the results of this
research can be utilized in real-world applications or further research.

Major CDP partnerships include state and local governments, Federal
Emergency Management agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Department
of Defense, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US
Geological Survey, National Institute of Health, Center for Disease
Control, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of State.

The designated national application areas under CDP/Disaster Management
are

:

-   Disaster Management (Fire, weather, climate, drought, flood)

-   Solid Earth and Natural hazards (NRA and Unsolicited Proposals)

-   Rosensteil (Congressional Mandate) (Ocean/Solid Earth)

-   RIT (Congressional Mandate) (Fire/Technology)

The applications developed under the CDP theme work with several
national centers in the development of applications that can be put into
operational use for DSS. These operational centers and their specific
contributions to the disaster management theme are listed here:

• NASA Headquarters - NRC Natural Disaster Roundtable, FEMA/Department
of Homeland Security MOU, NAS Board on Earth Science Research (BESR),
USGS/SENH, Univ. of Colorado Hazards Research and Applications Center,
GLOBE-CAN, NASA/CNES Workgroup, CEOS/World Summit for Sustainable
Development (WSSD).

• Stennis Space Center - Verification and Validation, Geospatial
development, USGS CINDI partnership, Stennis as the lead for Disaster
Application coordination with FEMA.

• Ames Research Center - UAV, Flightline Support

• Dryden Flight Research Center - Flightline Support

• JPL - SENH, Airborne Radar Data Library, American Association of State
Geologists (AASG) competitive research, LIDAR

• GSFC, Goddard Institute Goddard for Space Studies - Natural Hazards,
EO-1, Lidar, NRA, Hyperion, Earth Observatory, GIO OpenGIS,
precipitation, air quality, aerosols.

• NOAA Office of Research and Applications - Weather modeling, Quickscat
winds, Research to Applications Issues, MODIS Rapid Response.

• NOAA, National Centers for Environmental Prediction - USWRP, THORPEX

• Global Hydrology and Climate Center - GIS, Floods

• MSFC, Short Term Prediction Research and Transition Center - Severe
Storms, lightning mapping sensor

• NOAA National Center for Atmospheric Research - Outreach, Training

• Laboratory for Atmospheres - Weather and Climate modeling

• Laboratory for Terrestrial Physics - Earthquakes, Landslides

• Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes - Flooding, Precipitation

The CDP and disaster management theme will also work closely with our
internal program managers in the areas of Program Planning and
Applications, Education, Outreach, and Cross-Cutting Solutions.

Here are the specific areas of collaboration with these programs:

PP&A - Workshops on each national application, Performance Plan
measures, training.

Education - Briefings to educators and students and support of the GLOBE
program.

Outreach - Presentation materials, web development, workshops,
conferences.

Cross-Cutting Solutions - Geospatial Interoperability for Disaster
Management, Global Climate

Change initiatives, CCRI. Many disaster management applications require
the use of geospatial data. The Geospatial Interoperability Office will
closely collaborate on the HAZUS module and other disaster management
applications, like that of the National Weather Service\'s Advanced
Weather Interactive Processing System (AWIPS)

International and Constituent Affairs - Revision of agency MOU\'s and
MOA\'s

with NOAA, FEMA, and USGS.

The CDP program of NASA continues to support applications development
and cross-cutting solutions for disaster management applications. Since
the applications program is undergoing significant direction changes and
re-direction, the specific actions to date mainly concern the education
and demonstration of the NASA strategy for 2010 and beyond, the
applications to DSS through the systems engineering of applications
development, and the specific support of applications development
through NASA Research Announcements (NRA).

**NRA Announcement Details (2002 NRA):**

FY2002 saw the receipt, analysis and recommendations for the SENH NRA
for Applications Development. 10 proposals were chosen for FY2003
funding. The results are listed below in the following table.

Using SYS-EYFUS the Disaster Management program will fund and monitor
the progress of these research proposals.

This selection gives the following thematic distribution to the
SENH-Apps new project portfolio. Note that C&W refers to climate and
weather driven hazard and S refers to Solid Earth driven hazard.

  -------------- ---------------- --------------------------------------------------
  PI             HazClass         Hazard Driver Comments

  Brackenridge   flood            C&W, flood application based on ESE products with
                                  outstanding international partnership

  Fielding       subsidence       S, land subsidence SAR application pushing the
                                  data, technology, applied use to the limit

  Pieri          volcano          S, excellent use of UAV technology for volcano
                                  hazard characterization and monitoring

  Johnson        multihazard      S, pushes commercial LIDAR acquisition to limit of
                                  technology and industry capabilities

  Arsenault      flood/drought    C&W, innovative use of LDAS output for
                                  flood/drought decision support by Reclamation

  Sohlberg       wildfire         C&W, first sustained support for new
                                  product/service innovation in MODIS RR

  Kasischke      coastal          C&W+S, new ESE coastal change study to
                                  characterize regional/local sea level change

  Bourgeau       wildfire         C&W, new application of SAR technology for
                                  wildfire risk analysis

  Kim            flood/wildfire   C&W, advanced utilization of the SCIGN array for
                                  flood and wildfire prediction

  Bock           seismic          S, unique real-time civilian infrastructure strain
                                  monitoring applications of SCIGN array
  -------------- ---------------- --------------------------------------------------

The success of these projects will be determined by annual monitoring,
guiding the researchers to obtain significant results, and providing
these results to the research and applications community. The results of
these activities will culminate in three years. The CDP Disaster
Management program works closely with all 10 P. I. to develop synergy
with the CDP Disaster Management goals and program planning. This is
done through continual contact with investigators. GSFC is the focal
point for monitoring these projects.

1.  **Program Activities, Objectives, Goals, Deliverables, V&V,
    benchmarking, and Measures of Success**

FY03 - SHORT TERM RESULTS

> **Program Activity:**
>
> **Partnership process with other federal agencies -** Office of
> Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) requirement -- established
> agreement on "statements of common purpose" with partnering agencies
> on designated program areas. These will include revising MOU/MOA\'s
> (Strategic Partnership) with FEMA, NOAA, and USGS.
>
> Success Measure: Revised MOU with FEMA established in FY2003, NOAA MOU
> revised in 2004 with ORA and OSDPD, USGS MOU Revised in 2004.
>
> HAZUS - MH SUPPORT This will include establishing a detailed roadmap
> for enhancement of the HAZUS DSS with FEMA. FEMA plans to enhance
> their HAZUS system this year with a 2003 delivery of the product.
> (Current) FEMA has dedicated a significant budget to improvements to
> HAZUS-MH. For FY2003 FEMA funded \$117.4 million for financial and
> technical assistance to improve mitigation techniques and planning
> processes for reducing damage from earthquakes, hurricanes, dam
> failures and floods.
>
> HAZUS-MH, to be released in early Summer of 2003, is a nationally
> applicable standardized methodology and software program that will
> contain models for estimating potential losses from earthquakes,
> floods, and hurricanes. HAZUS-MH is developed by the Federal Emergency
> Management Agency (FEMA) under contract with the National Institute of
> Building Sciences (NIBS). NIBS maintains committees of wind, flood,
> earthquake and software experts to provide technical oversight and
> guidance to HAZUS-MH development. Loss estimates produced by HAZUS-MH
> will be based on current scientific and engineering knowledge of the
> effects of hurricanes, floods and earthquakes. Estimating losses is
> essential to decision-making at all levels of government, providing a
> basis for developing mitigation plans and policies, emergency
> preparedness, and response and recovery planning.
>
> HAZUS-MH will use state-of-the-art geographic information system
> software (ArcView) to map and display hazard data, and the results of
> damage and economic loss estimates for buildings and infrastructure.
> It will also allow users to estimate the impacts of hurricanes, floods
> and earthquakes to populations. HAZUS-MH will be fast running to
> facilitate use in real time to support response and recovery following
> a natural disaster. In the future we will look to HAZUS to provide
> fire damage assessment information.
>
> The HAZUS-MH Hurricane Module will allow users in the Atlantic and
> Gulf Coast regions of the U.S. to estimate hurricane winds and
> potential damage and loss to residential, commercial, and industrial
> buildings. It will also allow users to estimate direct economic loss,
> post-storm shelter needs, and building and tree debris quantities.
>
> The HAZUS-MH Flood Module will be capable of assessing riverine and
> coastal flooding. It will estimate potential damages to all classes of
> buildings, essential facilities, transportation lifelines, and utility
> lifelines, vehicles, and agricultural crops. The module will address
> building debris generation and shelter requirements. Direct losses
> will be estimated based on physical damage to structures, contents,
> and building interiors. The effects of flood warning will be taken
> into account, as will flow velocity effects. The Flood Information
> Tool (FIT), released in July 2002, allows users to prepare site flood
> hazard and other pertinent data for use in the HAZUS-MH Flood Module.
> Remote sensing data represent a potential for low-cost improvement of
> measurements for critical criteria utilized by the models within
> HAZUS-MH. NASA has agreed to work with FEMA to determine the utility
> of ESE and other remote sensing data to improve the quality of data
> being input to models that drive the HAZUS-MH modules.
>
> Success Measure: Revise Roadmap of HAZUS after review of FY2003
> requirements with FEMA. Establish joint efforts in the development of
> HAZUS with FEMA and the GIO Office of NASA.
>
> Administration of support from NASA centers, program partners, and
> funded partners associated with each program area. The main center of
> program support is SSC, but there is also supporting activity from
> Marshall, GSFC, JPL, and LaRC.
>
> Success Measure: Establish SSC as System Engineering Center for
> Disaster Management.
>
> Co-Chair of SDR Remote Sensing and Applications Workgroup. This
> activity will increase NASA\'s participation with other agency
> partners and have an influencing role in policy planning. A major
> activity for FY2003 and beyond is to establish a policy paper on a U.
> S. SAR mission and carry this paper forward to brief Congress and
> Congressional staff personnel on the need for a civilian based SAR
> mission.
>
> Success Measure: Establish policy white paper on U. S. SAR mission in
> conjunction with the SDR/RSAWG.
>
> Competitive Solicitations - NASA\'s planned contributions are in the
> area of the NASA Research Announcement (NRA) for FY2002 and the future
> announcements for FY2003 and beyond. There are over 100 NASA grant
> projects coming to an end under the SENH99 NRA. Progress reports are
> expected from each of these projects. Progress reports arrive at the
> rate of one or 2 per month. These are reviewed on arrival and then
> they tracked against the roadmap.
>
> Success Measure: The results of these NRA funded projects will be
> obtained and tracked in a database that lists the results and
> associated DSS. This database will be maintained through a web-based
> interface that will allow the P. I. to enter information on their
> research results. These results will be made available to other P.
> I.\'s and the public.
>
> Unsolicited Proposals - NASA support includes supporting unsolicited
> proposals and recurring costs related to ongoing research such as the
> Congressionally mandated projects at RIT and Rosensteil. The budgets
> for these projects are \$1,425,000 and \$1,200,000 respectively. The
> RIT contract supports US/Italian satellite development program to
> observe forest fires

but we will leverage the contract to contribute significantly to the CDP
program. The Rosensteil project supports the development of the Advanced
Tropical Remote Sensing Center, this project will be leveraged to
support the CDP program.

Success Measure: Meet with Rosensteil and RIT research staff to discuss
their plans and brief them on the CDP program plan.

NOAA Partnership - Develop partnership with NOAA under a new MOU and
work to improve NOAA operational mission components. This would include
improvements to NOAA Wildfire Management Information systems (Hazard
Mapping System DSS, AWIPS DSS) and the Operational Significant Events
Imagery Server. NOAA and NASA are collaborating on the transition of
MODIS Rapid Response to NOAA Operations. This will be work in
partnership with OSDPD and ORA of NESDIS. Results obtained will be
useful for NPOESS VIIRS product implementation as well as significant
improvements to NOAA\'s Decision Support Systems for wildfire
management. This will be a three year funded project with the intent to
decrease funding and move the application to operations fully supported
by NOAA.

Success Measure: NOAA proposal funded to bring MODIS Rapid Response to
NOAA through a UMD contract.

### NASA/USGS Partnership - USGS operates the Rapid Land Change Program to provide information on natural disasters to emergency response agencies. Collaboration to verify and validate remote sensing for improved USGS products. This activity is coordinated by Bruce Davis (SSC).

> Success Measure: Agreement with USGS established by 2004. Center under
> the management of USGS.

Map Modernization Program. FEMA has invested \$32 million in FY2002 to
update and digitize flood maps and make them available over the
Internet. In FY2003 they are allocating \$350 million, an effective
order of magnitude increase.

Success Measure: NASA will support the FEMA's map modernization project
through the research being conducted in North Carolina and Texas by SSC.
NASA will also investigate new methods and sensors for building high
quality DEM\'s critical in the development of accurate flood maps.

FEMA DisasterHelp.Gov - NASA is working with FEMA in the development of
DisasterHelp.Gov under their e-Government initiative.

Success Measure: Disasterhelp operational and updated.

Weather Research - The US Weather Research Program plans to run a major
experiment called THORPEX to collect detailed meteorological data to
improve forecast models. (Current) The USWRP has dedicated a significant
contribution to the USWRP THORPEX project. NASA is supporting this
research effort through intense data collection activities run from
LaRC.

Success Measure: Participate in USWRP program reviews. Support related
lightning research at MSFC. Support activities where possible through
UAV, or data acquisitions.

State Department Partnership - NASA is working with the State Department
in implementing DSS\'s for the Humanitarian Information Unit.
(Current/Planned)

Success Measure: Assist HIU in obtaining information about NASA\'s ESE.
Invite them to such meetings as the Land Science meeting hosted by CODE
YS. Bring GIO and HIU together to discuss interoperability and
geospatial processing.

Severe Storm Research - NASA working with MSFC, SPORT on development of
requirements for a Lightning Mapping Sensor (LMS)

Success Measure: Work with SPORT in transition of DSS\'s to NOAA/NWS.

Hazard/Disaster Event Monitoring - Earth Observatory Support is provided
to GFSC to continue the development and operation of special event
imagery and services. It is the desire of the CDP program to establish
partnerships with other agencies, such as NOAA, in this program

Success Measure: Improved hazard images for public use.

GWU Proposal: Earth Science Research and Applications. This proposal by
the Space Policy Institute will investigate ways to improve knowledge of
the Earth System, moving research to operations, and measuring the
impact of GIFTS.

Success Measure: A report that decision and policy makers can use to
improve the transition from research to operations.

Homeland Security. There is a strong connection between Homeland
Security and disaster management, particularly where FEMA HAZUS is
utilized. The application of HAZUS to Homeland Security will be
investigated.

Success Measure: HAZUS utilized for homeland security.

Correcting Human-Induced Effects on SCIGN - Wayne Thatcher: This
proposal was received by SENH some time ago. USGS has been working on
the SCIGN network for 4 years. FY2003 funding would be the 5th year of
SCIGN related work, but this is a very valuable project that will help
understand the variances in the SCIGN network.

Success Measure: Improvements to the SCIGN Network that can be used in
other areas of the Country.

International Partnerships - The CDP Disaster Management Program
continually works with International Partners such as the CEOS WSSD,
United Nations, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), and other
international agencies and country representatives through the Code YO
program planning application.

Success Measure - Establish working plan for the CEOS WSSD Disaster
Management and Conflicts Module 3 under the WSSD Type -2 partnerships.
NASA is the chair of this module.

Goddard MODIS and Aerosol - The project will advance the use of MODIS in
aerosol research and applications to air quality, fire, and disaster
management. Funding will be provided for three years to support this
research.

Success Measure - Improvements to air quality assessment for fire
management and air quality forecasts.

#### FY03/04/05/06/07/08 Budget and Resource Expectations

### Disaster Management Applications FUNDING FY03-FY08

+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| ITEM                 | ###    | **   | **   | **   | **   | **   |
|                      | #####  | FY20 | FY20 | FY20 | FY20 | FY20 |
|                      | FY2003 | 04** | 05** | 06** | 07** | 08** |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| FEMA HAZUS Support   | 1      | 150  | 150  | 100  | 100  | 100  |
| (Wind) (SSC)         | 50,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| FEMA HAZUS WaveWatch | 3      | 340  | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| (SSC)                | 42,376 | ,000 |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| FEMA HAZUS           | 50,000 | 100  | 100  | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Lidar/SRTM/Mapping   |        | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |      |
| (SSC)                |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| HAZUS Enhancements   | 0      | 150  | 140  | 300  | 200  | 200  |
| (Flood/Fire)         |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| SENH 2002            | 1,5    | 1    | 1    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
|                      | 85,424 | ,518 | ,429 |      |      |      |
|                      |        | ,544 | ,333 |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Natural Hazards CAN  | 0      | 1    | 1    | 1    | 0    | 0    |
| 2003                 |        | ,500 | ,500 | ,500 |      |      |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Natural Hazards CAN  | 0      | 0    | 1    | 1    | 1    | 0    |
| 2004                 |        |      | ,500 | ,500 | ,500 |      |
|                      |        |      | 0,00 | ,000 | ,000 |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Natural Hazards CAN  | 0      | 0    | 0    | 0    | 2    | 2    |
| 2005                 |        |      |      |      | ,000 | ,000 |
|                      |        |      |      |      | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Hazard Center        | 78,482 | 78   | 78   | 90   | 90   | 100  |
|                      |        | ,482 | ,482 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| NAS/BESR             | 70,000 | 70   | 80   | 80   | 80   | 0    |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| NAS/Roundtable       | 30,000 | 35   | 40   | 45   | 45   | 50   |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| OSTP/SDR             | 30,000 | 30   | 30   | 30   | 30   | 35   |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| JPL AASG             | 2      | 200  | 200  | 200  | 200  | 200  |
|                      | 00,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| AMES Flight Requests | 0      | 25   | 50   | 0    | 0    | 0    |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Crowley Flights      | 2,800  | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| ASTER Costa Rica     | 25,000 | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Flights (Turner)     |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Flight Requests      | 20,000 | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| (Fire Hazards)       |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| NOAA (MODIS)         | 1      | 50   | 25   | 0    | 0    | 0    |
|                      | 50,000 | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| NOAA (EO/OSEI)       | 0      | 30   | 30   | 0    | 0    | 0    |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Earth Observatory    | 1      | 100  | 100  | 100  | 100  | 150  |
|                      | 25,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Forest Service       | 40,000 | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| (MODIS)              |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Goetz (Expansive     | 4      | 49   | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Soils)               | 01,646 | ,726 |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Sever (Mayan Forest) | 1      | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
|                      | 00,000 |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Planning for         | 93,000 | 57   | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Catastrophe \[Muir\] |        | ,000 |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| GWU Earth Science    | 70,000 | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| R&A                  |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Study on DSS Results | 0      | 0    | 0    | 150  | 150  | 0    |
|                      |        |      |      | ,000 | ,000 |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Human Induced        | 1      | 50   | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Effects on SCIGN     | 01,700 | ,000 |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| JOINT FEMA, NOAA,    | 0      | 500  | 1    | 1    | 1    | 2    |
| USGS, CAN (Fire)     |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,500 | ,000 |
|                      |        |      | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Support to SSC       | 35,000 | 150  | 100  | 300  | 100  | 100  |
| (Engineering, V&V,   |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
| REASON CAN)          |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Support to MSFC      | 25,000 | 50   | 30   | 100  | 0    | 0    |
| SPORT CENTER         |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |
| (lightning)          |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| GSFC/USGS            | 25,000 | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Precipitation Conf.  |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| GSFC MODIS and       | 1      | 100  | 100  | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Aerosol              | 00,000 | ,000 | ,000 |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| NAS Study on         | 75,000 | 35   | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| Humanitarian         |        | ,000 |      |      |      |      |
| Information          |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| Program Activity     | 1,000  | 50   | 400  | 400  | 200  | 200  |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| ######### T          | *      | *    | *    | *    | *    | *    |
| OTAL Budget Required | *3,926 | *5,4 | *5,5 | *5,8 | *6,2 | *5,1 |
|                      | ,428** | 18,7 | 97,8 | 95,0 | 95,0 | 35,0 |
|                      |        | 52** | 15** | 00** | 00** | 00** |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| #########            | 3,9    | 5    | 5    | 6    | 6    |      |
|                      | 00,000 | ,500 | ,500 | ,500 | ,500 |      |
|                      |        | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 | ,000 |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| ######### RIT (Co    | 1,8    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| ngressional Mandate) | 00,000 |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+
| ####                 | 1,2    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    | 0    |
| ##### Rosensteil (Co | 00,000 |      |      |      |      |      |
| ngressional Mandate) |        |      |      |      |      |      |
+----------------------+--------+------+------+------+------+------+

**[SENH NRA2002 Budget Support Breakdown]{.underline}**

  ---------------- -------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
  **PI**           **HazClass**         **FY2003**   **FY2004**   **FY2005**

  Brackenridge     flood                64,743       67,332       70,027

  Fielding         subsidence           119,770      124,980      72,175

  Pieri            volcano              118,400      0            0

  Johnson          multihazard          156,597      159,418      161,044

  Arsenault        flood/drought        141,769      146,427      149,701

  Sohlberg\*       wildfire             223,326      227,512      224,690

  Kasischke        coastal              140,761      135,382      141,226

  Bourgeau-Cha     wildfire             226,624      226,608      226,605

  Kim              flood/wildfire       203,964      213,101      223,733

  Bock             seismic              189,470      217,784      160,132

                                        **TOTAL**    **TOTAL**    **TOTAL**

                                        1,585,424    1,518,544    1,429,333
  ---------------- -------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------

The First year of the NRA awards shows a burden of \$1,585,424. This
will be spilt funded across fiscal years FY02 and FY03. The FY02
contribution is \$653,313. So the FY03 contribution to year one of the
awards is \$932,111. The FY03 contribution to the year 2 the awards is
\$650,000.

This yields a total SENH annual burden of approximately \$1,500.000 per
year.

**Planned Management Approach (e.g., Reviews, etc.)**

The program will be management by the Program Manager for Disaster
Management. Reviews will be conducted periodically by the Program
Manager and other centers. Close coordination and documentation of
accomplishments will be attained through partner workshops and resulting
papers and presentation.