**Integrated Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants
Program -- Methyl Bromide Transitions**

***[FY 2008 Request for Applications]{.underline}***

**APPLICATION DEADLINE: February 22, 2008**

![](media/image1.png)

#  U.S. Department of Agriculture

![](media/image2.png){width="0.47708333333333336in"
height="0.5923611111111111in"} **Cooperative State Research, Education,
and Extension Service**

**COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND EXTENSION SERVICE; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE**

**INTEGRATED RESEARCH, EDUCATION, AND EXTENSION COMPETITIVE GRANTS
PROGRAM --METHYL BROMIDE TRANSITIONS**

**INITIAL ANNOUNCEMENT**

**CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE:** This program is listed in
the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under 10.303, Integrated
Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants Program.

**DATES:** Applications must be received by close of business (COB) on
**February 22, 2008 (5:00 p.m. Eastern Time)**. Applications received
after this deadline will normally not be considered for funding.
Comments regarding this request for applications (RFA) are requested
within six months from the issuance of this notice. Comments received
after that date will be considered to the extent practicable.

**STAKEHOLDER INPUT:** The Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service (CSREES) is requesting comments regarding this RFA
from any interested party. These comments will be considered in the
development of the next RFA for the program, if applicable, and will be
used to meet the requirements of section 103(c)(2) of the Agricultural
Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C.
7613(c)(2)). This section requires the Secretary to solicit and consider
input on a current RFA from persons who conduct or use agricultural
research, education and extension for use in formulating future RFAs for
competitive programs. Written stakeholder comments on this RFA should be
submitted in accordance with the deadline set forth in the DATES portion
of this Notice.

Written stakeholder comments should be submitted by mail to: Policy,
Oversight, and Funds Management Staff; Office of Extramural Programs;
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; USDA; STOP
2299; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW; Washington, DC 20250-2299; or via
e-mail to: [RFP-<OEP@csrees.usda.gov>]{.underline}. (This e-mail address
is intended only for receiving comments regarding this RFA and not
requesting information or forms.) In your comments, please state that
you are responding to the Integrated Research, Education, and Extension
Competitive Grants Program -- Methyl Bromide Transitions RFA.

**EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:** CSREES requests applications for the Integrated
Research, Education, and Extension Competitive Grants Program Methyl
Bromide Transitions (MBT) for fiscal year (FY) 2008 to support the
discovery and implementation of practical pest management alternatives
to methyl bromide uses or minimize methyl bromide emissions for which
the United States is requesting critical use exemptions. Critical Use
Nominations for 2009 include the following uses: commodities; cucurbits;
eggplant; fruit, nut, and flower nursery; food facilities; forest
seedling; ham; orchard replant; ornamental; peppers; post harvest;
strawberry fruit; strawberry nursery; sweet potato slips; and tomato
(see the "Nomination Chapters for 2009" listed on the right sidebar of
the following EPA website:
<http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/2009_nomination.html>).

The program is focused on integrated commercial or field scale research
that targets short- to medium-term solutions and associated extension
activity that will foster the adoption of these solutions. The
anticipated amount available for support of this program in FY 2008 is
approximately \$2,950,000.

This notice identifies the objectives for MBT projects, the eligibility
criteria for projects and applicants, and the application forms and
associated instructions needed to apply for a MBT grant. CSREES
additionally requests stakeholder input from any interested party for
use in the development of the next RFA for this program.

**Table of Contents**

[PART I---FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION
5](#__RefHeading___Toc184696956)

[A. Legislative Authority and Background
5](#__RefHeading___Toc184696957)

[B. Purpose and Priorities 5](#__RefHeading___Toc184696958)

[C. Program Area Description 10](#__RefHeading___Toc184696959)

[PART II---AWARD INFORMATION 11](#__RefHeading___Toc184696960)

[A. Available Funding 11](#__RefHeading___Toc184696961)

[B. Types of Applications 11](#__RefHeading___Toc184696962)

[C. Project Types 11](#__RefHeading___Toc184696963)

[PART III---ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION 12](#__RefHeading___Toc184696964)

[A. Eligible Applicants 12](#__RefHeading___Toc184696965)

[B. Cost Sharing or Matching 12](#__RefHeading___Toc184696966)

[PART IV---APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION
13](#__RefHeading___Toc184696967)

[A. Electronic Application Package 13](#__RefHeading___Toc184696968)

[B. Content and Form of Application Submission
14](#__RefHeading___Toc184696969)

[C. Submission Dates and Times 17](#__RefHeading___Toc184696970)

[D. Funding Restrictions 17](#__RefHeading___Toc184696971)

[E. Other Submission Requirements 18](#__RefHeading___Toc184696972)

[PART V---APPLICATION REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
19](#__RefHeading___Toc184696973)

[A. General 19](#__RefHeading___Toc184696974)

[B. Evaluation Criteria 19](#__RefHeading___Toc184696975)

[C. Conflicts of Interest and Confidentiality
22](#__RefHeading___Toc184696976)

[D. Organizational Management Information
22](#__RefHeading___Toc184696977)

[PART VI---AWARD ADMINISTRATION 23](#__RefHeading___Toc184696978)

[A. General 23](#__RefHeading___Toc184696979)

[B. Award Notice 23](#__RefHeading___Toc184696980)

[C. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
24](#__RefHeading___Toc184696981)

[D. Expected Program Outputs and Reporting Requirements
25](#__RefHeading___Toc184696982)

[PART VII---AGENCY CONTACT 26](#__RefHeading___Toc184696983)

[PART VIII---OTHER INFORMATION 27](#__RefHeading___Toc184696984)

[A. Access to Review Information 27](#__RefHeading___Toc184696985)

[B. Use of Funds; Changes 27](#__RefHeading___Toc184696986)

[C. Confidential Aspects of Applications and Awards
28](#__RefHeading___Toc184696987)

[D. Regulatory Information 28](#__RefHeading___Toc184696988)

[E. Definitions 28](#__RefHeading___Toc184696989)

[Electronic Application Checklist 31](#__RefHeading___Toc184696990)

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696956 .anchor}**PART I---FUNDING OPPORTUNITY
DESCRIPTION**

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696957 .anchor}A. Legislative Authority and
Background

Section 406 of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education
Reform Act of 1998 (AREERA) (7 U.S.C. 7626) authorized the Secretary of
Agriculture to establish a competitive grants program that provides
funding for integrated, multifunctional agricultural research,
extension, and education activities. Subject to the availability of
appropriations to carry out this program, the Secretary may award grants
to colleges and universities (as defined by section 1404 of the National
Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977
(NARETPA) (7 U.S.C. 3103)) on a competitive basis for projects that
address priorities in United States agriculture and involve integrated
research, education, and extension activities, as determined by the
Secretary in consultation with the National Agricultural Research,
Extension, Education, and Economics Advisory Board.

 

Section 7206 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
amended section 406(b) of AREERA to add the 1994 Land-Grant Institutions
as eligible to apply for grants under this authority.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696958 .anchor}B. Purpose and Priorities

The Methyl Bromide Transitions (MBT) FY 2008 competitive grants program
supports the discovery and implementation of practical pest management
alternatives to methyl bromide or reduction of methyl bromide emission
for uses for which the United States is requesting critical use
exemptions. Methyl bromide (MeBr) is an odorless, colorless gas that has
been used as an agricultural soil and structural fumigant to control a
wide variety of pests. However, because MeBr depletes the stratospheric
ozone layer and is classified as a Class I ozone-depleting substance,
the amount of MeBr produced and imported in the United States is being
incrementally reduced. In accordance with the *Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer* and the Clean Air Act, the
United States was to reduce methyl bromide production and net imports
incrementally from the 1991 baseline until the complete phase-out in
2005. Since 2005, the only allowable exemptions are those nominations
approved by the United Nations Environment *Programme* Methyl Bromide
Technical Options Committee (MBTOC), such as the critical use exemptions
(CUEs). Critical Use Nominations (CUNs) for an exemption may be approved
when: a) there are no alternatives currently available that are
technically and economically feasible; b) there are no alternatives
acceptable from a public health standpoint; and c) an active research
program is seeking viable alternatives to use of methyl bromide
fumigation or seeking reduction in emissions for that nomination.

Under the Montreal Protocol and the Clean Air Act, the production and
import phase-out for methyl bromide in the United States followed this
schedule:

  ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
  1993 to 1998  Freeze at 1991 baseline levels (U.S. consumption \~25,500
                Metric *Tonnes*; consumption = production + import -
                export).

  1999 and 2000 25% reduction from baseline levels.

  2001 and 2002 50% reduction from baseline levels.

  2003 and 2004 70% reduction from baseline levels.

  2005          100% phase out -except for allowable exemptions such as
                critical use nominations (CUNs) agreed to by the Montreal
                Protocol Parties.

  2006          32.03% of baseline levels was authorized for CUNs.

  2007          26.4% of the 1991 baseline levels for CUNs.

  2008          21% of the 1991 baseline levels for CUNs.

  2009          19.5% of the 1991 baseline levels was requested for CUNs.
  ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------

The MBT program is seeking proposals to ensure that economically viable
and environmentally sound alternatives to methyl bromide are in place
and available as soon as possible for the current 2009 Critical Use
Nominations. Those submitting applications should consider these
specific CUNs and the 2009 Methyl Bromide Usage Newer Numerical Index
(BUNNI), which are located under "Nomination Chapters for 2009" on the
right sidebar of the following EPA website:
<http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/2009_nomination.html>. The BUNNI includes
the projected timeline for transition from methyl bromide fumigation to
alternatives related to specific uses. The 2009 CUNs listed on the
website include descriptions of alternative controls or application
methods evaluated and the barriers or specific limitations such as soil
temperature, Karst, terrain, buffer zones, economics, etc., that limit
alternatives and make continued use of methyl bromide necessary for each
of the 15 nominations. Nominations include: Name(s) of alternative(s),
technical and regulatory reasons for alternatives not being feasible or
available; cost considerations; current research priorities; pests
targeted; and characteristics of production systems. Proposals must
include methods/technology to reduce methyl bromide use and emissions
that address the specific conditions and factors (seasonal soil
temperatures, soil types, cropping systems, costs, etc.) limiting
transition from methyl bromide fumigation to alternative pest management
strategies.

The MBT grant program emphasizes commercial or field scale research
targeting short- to medium-term solutions that will develop new
alternatives, result in registration and adoption of new alternatives,
and/or minimize methyl bromide emissions. Large-scale trials may
identify variability, technical problems, and pest relationships to
marketable yields that are not evident in small plot trials. Repeat of
research for two or more cropping seasons or trials is encouraged.
Comprehensive information on the impact of alternatives on efficacy and
methyl bromide emissions and profit margins compared to methyl bromide
fumigation is an integral part of the MBT program focus. Although much
of the technology and potential alternatives developed for other
crops/issues can be transferred to critical use nominations, adequate
evaluation for specific new uses must be completed. Proposals addressing
critical use nominations for which there is not an extensive database
are encouraged.

The MBT encourages projects that develop content suitable for delivery
through eXtension (see Part I. C. for more information). Funds may be
used to contribute to an existing Community of Practice with a methyl
bromide alternatives component or to form a new Community of Practice
with a focus on methyl bromide alternatives education and outreach
activities. Education programs in the classroom or through distance
education will present the challenges and potential alternatives with
efficacy and economic comparisons to methyl bromide fumigation.

**The following components must be in the proposal or it will not be
considered:**

1.  **Economic analysis with direct comparison of cost effectiveness of
    proposed alternative with methyl bromide.** Comprehensive
    information on the impact of such alternatives on efficacy and
    profit margins compared with methyl bromide fumigation is required.
    Repeat of research for two or more cropping seasons or trials is
    encouraged.

2.  **Integration of two or more of the three facets (research,
    extension and education).**

Refer to Part II., C. "Project Types".

3.  **Clear statement of specific 2009 CUN and specific limitations
    being addressed.** MBT applicants must explain how their work is
    applicable to the 2009 Critical Use Nomination (CUN). Even though
    the CUN for use of methyl bromide are on specific agricultural crops
    (e.g., tomato), from specific geographical areas, in specific crop
    production systems (e.g., open field) or for use in specific
    post-harvest applications or structural applications for which there
    are currently no acceptable alternatives, grant applications to
    alleviate one or more of the limitations for use of alternatives or
    to reduce methyl bromide emissions may come from any U.S. state or
    region. Proposals do not have to address all the pests for the 2009
    CUN. Proposed projects may provide alternatives for management of
    one or more pests or limiting situations that may be potentially
    included in an integrated pest management system.

4.  **Timelines for completion of each major objective in the
    application.**

**The following are the 15 Critical Use Nominations for 2009:**

1.  **Post-Harvest Use for Commodities. Includes walnuts, dried fruit
    (prunes, raisins, figs), dates, and dried beans garbanzo and
    blackeye) produced in California,** which are under intense pressure
    from numerous insect pests. Requested by California Bean Shippers,
    California Dried Plum Board, California Walnut Commission, and
    California Date Commission.

2.  **Pre-plant Soil Use for Cucurbits Grown in Open Fields**. Includes
    cucurbits (squash, melons, and cucumber) grown in Alabama, Arkansas,
    Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, South
    Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. These crops generally are grown
    in open fields on plastic tarps, often followed by various other
    crops. Harvest is destined for the fresh market. Specific 2008
    regional requests: Michigan-Cucurbit, Southeast-Cucurbit,
    Georgia-Squash, Georgia-Cucumber, Georgia-Melon.

3.  **Pre-plant Soil Use for Eggplant Grown in Open Fields**. This is a
    request for eggplant grown in open fields in the States of Florida,
    Georgia, and Michigan.

4.  **Pre-plant Soil Use for Fruit, Nut and Flower Nurseries**. This
    nomination is based on requests for critical use of methyl bromide
    by producers of nursery-grown raspberry, roses, and deciduous tree
    planting material. Request by Western Raspberry Nurseries,
    California Deciduous Fruit & Nut Tree Growers, California Nursery
    Roses.

5.  **Post-Harvest Use in Structures - Food Processing Plants**. This
    sector includes rice mills, flour mills, pet food manufacturing
    facilities, and a few bakeries. Requested by Rice Miller's
    Association, Bakeries, Pet Food Institute, North American Miller's
    Association.

6.  **Pre-plant Soil Use for Forest Seedlings**. Forest seedling
    nurseries in the United States supply conifer and hardwood seedlings
    that are used for reforestation, forest establishment, fiber
    production, and wildlife and conservation uses. Nurseries in the
    United States are located in eight climate zones (Zones 3 to 10) and
    have mostly light or medium soils. The majority of seedlings are
    species of conifers, especially pine. In addition, 30-60 species of
    hardwoods, such as oaks, hickory, poplars, and ash, are produced.
    Nurseries produce seedlings adapted to their respective regional
    conditions, with variables such as climate and soil type. Forest
    seedling nurseries requesting critical use of methyl bromide include
    both public and private nursery operations. Specific requests from:
    Southern Forest Nursery, International Paper, Illinois Department of
    Natural Resources, Weyerhaeuser (SE, NW), NE Forest & Conservation
    Nursery, Michigan Seedling Association.

7.  **Post-Harvest Use on Dry Cured Pork Products**. This sector is for
    the production of cured meat products, such as country hams. These
    are produced primarily in the southern United States Requested by:
    Gwaltney of Smithfield, National Country Ham Association, Nahunta
    Pork Center, and American Association of Meat Processors.

8.  **Pre-plant Soil Use for Orchard Replant**. The Orchard Replant
    sector represents stone fruit, almond, and walnut orchards, and
    grapes grown in parts of California. Growers of all of these crops
    face a common threat---nematodes and a poorly understood disease
    complex called orchard replant "problem", or "disorder". The problem
    can be of varying severity depending on orchard location, crop, soil
    texture, soil moisture, or other factors. Requests by: California
    Grape and Tree Fruit League-Stone Fruit; California Grape and Tree
    Fruit League-Raisin & Table Grapes; Central California Winegrowers;
    California Walnut Commission; Almond Hullers & Processors
    Association.

9.  **Pre-plant Soil Use for Cut Flower, Bulb, and Herbaceous Perennial
    Ornamentals Grown in Open Fields or in Protected Environments**. In
    the United States, cut flower, cut foliage and bulb crops are grown
    in open fields and under cover (including glass, poly, and saran).
    Requested by: California Cut Flower Commission; Florida Cut Flowers;
    Michigan Herbaceous Perennials.

10. **Pre-plant Soil Use for Peppers Grown in Open Fields on Plastic
    Tarpaulins**. Peppers grown in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
    Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, South Carolina,
    Tennessee, and Virginia. Michigan, Florida, Georgia, and the
    southeastern United States (except Georgia and Florida) are each
    presented as separate regions in this nomination to reflect the
    separate applications from growers in these areas. Specific request
    by: Southeast Pepper, Georgia Pepper, Florida Pepper and Michigan
    Pepper Growers.

11. **Post-Harvest Use by NPMA for Facilities and Commodities**. This
    sector includes commodities and food processing plants treated by
    National Pest Management Association (NPMA) members and are not
    included in the Commodity or in the Food Facilities Chapters of the
    U.S. nomination. **Commodities included in this application are:
    processed foods (such as chips, crackers, cookies and pasta), spices
    and herbs, cocoa, and cheese processing plants.** Methyl bromide is
    typically utilized in processed food and feed facilities as a space
    fumigant for treating the facility one to three times per year. As
    the need arises, methyl bromide is also used for trailer fumigations
    of product or packaging material. These facilities are under intense
    pressure from many insect pests as well as rodents. Requested by:
    Processed Foods, Spices and Herbs, Cocoa, Cheese Processing Plants.

12. **Pre-plant Soil Use for Strawberries Grown for Fruit in Open
    Fields**. This nomination is for methyl bromide use in three major
    strawberry production areas---California, Florida, and states in the
    eastern U.S. (Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky,
    Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, South
    Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Virginia). Request by:
    California Strawberry Commission, Eastern Strawberry and Florida
    Fruit and Vegetable Association.

13. **Pre-plant Soil Use for Strawberry Nurseries in Open Fields or in
    Protected Environments**. Southeastern U.S. growers (from Maryland,
    North Carolina, and Tennessee) produce transplants in open fields.
    California growers produce their transplants over a five-year cycle.
    Request by California and Southeastern States. Requested by
    California Strawberry Nursery Association and Southeastern
    Strawberry Consortium.

14. **Pre-plant Soil Use for Tomato Grown in Open Fields**. Tomato crops
    are grown in open fields for fruit in Michigan and South-Eastern
    United States (Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
    Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee). Currently
    registered alternatives to methyl bromide do not consistently
    provide effective control of nutsedge weed species and more time is
    needed to evaluate relationship between fumigant alternatives,
    various mulches, and herbicide systems under different growing
    conditions. The U.S. nomination is only for those areas where the
    alternatives are not suitable. In U.S. tomato production, there are
    several factors that make the potential alternatives to methyl
    bromide unsuitable. Request by Michigan Tomato, Southeast Tomato
    (Includes Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina,
    South Carolina, and Tennessee) and Florida Tomato (Florida -- North
    Florida, Ruskin / Palmetto, Palm Beach, Southwest, Dade County)
    Growers.

15. **Pre-plant Use on Sweet Potato Slips Grown in Open Fields.** This
    request is for growers who cannot use 1,3-dichloropropene because
    of: the California prohibition on its use in January and the
    township cap on 1,3-D requiring an application factor of 1.9 in
    December and the cap being exceeded in November (Cal DPR. 2002). The
    soil for sweet potato slips is fumigated from November through
    January. Sweet potatoes are transplanted from plant propagules,
    called slips, that are transplanted between late April and late May.
    The majority of sweet potatoes are harvested in early November. They
    are a warm-season crop and are sensitive to even a light frost and
    must be planted and harvested during seasons where there is no
    chance of frost. Sweet potato production generally occurs in sandy
    to loamy sand soils since heavy soils affect yield and root quality.
    Request by the Sweet Potato Council of California.

**The following resources may be useful in developing Methyl Bromide
Transitions applications:**

In addition to the information contained in the 2009 CUNs and BUNNIs, a
matrix of alternatives identified by the United Nations' technical
committees for methyl bromide is available at
<http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/in_alt_in.html>. While not all of the
alternatives listed by the United Nations are currently available to the
agricultural and structural industries in the United States, some do
have potential to control pests currently controlled by methyl bromide.
Integration of specific controls into current production systems will
depend on availability, efficacy, logistics, economics, and grower
acceptance. In all these cases, combinations of chemical and
non-chemical materials and methods will likely be the most efficacious.
It is unlikely that there will be one alternative for all of the uses of
methyl bromide, but there may be several specific pest control tools
which can manage specific pests currently controlled with methyl bromide
when used as part of an overall integrated pest management program.

EPA has published 30 case studies which describe potential alternatives
to the use of methyl bromide. The full text of all of these documents is
online at EPA's Methyl Bromide Alternatives Case Studies
(<http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/casestudies/index.html>) web page.

The USDA CSREES Methyl Bromide Transitions program has supported
projects since fiscal year 2000 on research and outreach to identify
viable alternatives to use of methyl bromide fumigation and methods and
technology for reduction of emissions from methyl bromide fumigations.
Abstracts of funded projects may be found at:
[www.csrees.usda.gov/fo/methylbromideicgp.html](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/fo/methylbromideicgp.html).

Background information and an overview of the search for alternatives to
methyl bromide is presented by E. N. Rosskopf, et. al., *Alternatives to
Methyl Bromide: A Florida Perspective*, at
<http://www.apsnet.org/online/feature/methylbromide/>.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696959 .anchor}C. Program Area Description

Grants for this program are for integrated projects up to three years.
Budget requests are expected to be multi-investigator and/or
multi-institutional. Although no maximum limit has been set for funding
individual MBT proposals, please see abstracts of funded projects at:
([www.csrees.usda.gov/fo/methylbromideicgp.html](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/fo/methylbromideicgp.html)).

The MBT encourages projects that develop content suitable for delivery
through eXtension. This content is for "end users" as opposed to staff
development and must align with the eXtension Guiding Principles,
Implementation Plan and other requirements as presented at the site
[http://intranet.extension.org](http://intranet.extension.org/).  

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696960 .anchor}PART II---AWARD INFORMATION

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696961 .anchor}A. Available Funding

There is no commitment by USDA to fund any particular application or to
make a specific number of awards. CSREES anticipates approximately
\$2,950,000 will be available to fund applications in FY 2008.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696962 .anchor}B. Types of Applications

In FY 2008, applications may be submitted to the Methyl Bromide
Transitions Program as one of the following two types of requests:

**[(1) New application]{.underline}**. This is a project application
that has not been previously submitted to the MBT Program. All new
applications will be reviewed competitively using the selection process
and evaluation criteria described in Part V---Application Review
Requirements.

**[(2) Resubmitted application]{.underline}**. This is an application
that had previously been submitted to the MBT Program but not funded.
Project Directors (PDs) must respond to the previous review panel
summary. Resubmitted applications must be received by the relevant due
dates, will be evaluated in competition with other pending applications
in appropriate area to which they are assigned, and will be reviewed
according to the same evaluation criteria as new applications.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696963 .anchor}C. Project Types

The Methyl Bromide Transitions (MBT) program supports integrated,
multifunctional, multidisciplinary agricultural research, extension, and
education activities that lead to the discovery and implementation of
practical alternatives for agricultural uses that have previously been
managed with the fumigant methyl bromide. At least two of the three
science components (research, extension and education) must be included
in proposed projects and generally no more than two thirds of the
project's budget should be devoted to any one component. Formal
extension and/or education programs to expedite adoption of proposed
alternatives must be clearly delineated in the proposal and funding for
these activities should be clearly outlined in the budget narrative.
Research should address the critical use nominations or alternatives to
methyl bromide for new critical pest management issues.  The expectation
is that research will not only result in adoption of techniques and
methods to significantly reduce methyl bromide use or emissions, but
will also lead to product registration, if required. The research will
result in direct efficacy and economic comparisons of proposed
alternatives with methyl bromide fumigation. Extension programs, such as
field demonstrations, grower trials, workshops, and distributed
information, should result in commercial awareness, understanding and
adoption of new technology and methods to reduce methyl bromide
emissions and/or adoption of alternatives to methyl bromide fumigation.
Applicants are encouraged to submit a LOGIC model that details the
activities; outputs; and learning, action, and condition outcomes of the
proposed project. This information may be provided as a narrative or
formatted into a logic model chart. More information and resources
related to the logic model planning process are provided at
<http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/integrated/integrated_logic_model.html>.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696964 .anchor}PART III---ELIGIBILITY
INFORMATION

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696965 .anchor}A. Eligible Applicants

Applications may be submitted by colleges and universities (as defined
in Section 1404 of (NARETPA) (7 U.S.C. 3103)). For purposes of this
program, the terms "college" and "university" mean an educational
institution in any State that (1) admits as regular students only
persons having a certificate of graduation, or the recognized equivalent
of such a certificate, from a school providing secondary education; (2)
is legally authorized within such State to provide a program of
education beyond secondary education; (3) provides an educational
program for which a bachelor's degree or any other higher degree is
awarded; (4) is a public or other nonprofit institution; and (5) is
accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association.
Applications also may be submitted by 1994 Land-Grant Institutions (as
defined in Part VIII, E.). **A research foundation maintained by a
college or university is not eligible to receive an award under this
program.**

Award recipients may subcontract to organizations not eligible to apply
provided such organizations are necessary for the conduct of the
project. An applicant's failure to meet an eligibility criterion by the
time of an application deadline will result in CSREES not accepting the
application, or even though an application may be reviewed, will
preclude CSREES from making an award.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696966 .anchor}B. Cost Sharing or Matching

If a grant provides a particular benefit to a specific agricultural
commodity, the grant recipient is required to provide funds or in-kind
support to match the amount of the grant funds provided. See section (b)
on Matching Funds under Part IV(B)(5), for more details.

CSREES may waive the matching funds requirement specified in the above
paragraph for a grant if CSREES determines that (a) the results of the
project, while of particular benefit to a specific agricultural
commodity, are likely to be applicable to agricultural commodities
generally; or (b) the project involves a minor commodity, the project
deals with scientifically important research, and the grant recipient is
unable to satisfy the matching funds requirement.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696967 .anchor}PART IV---APPLICATION AND
SUBMISSION INFORMATION

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696968 .anchor}A. Electronic Application
Package

Only electronic applications may be submitted via Grants.gov to CSREES
in response to this RFA.

Prior to preparing an application, it is suggested that the PD/PI first
contact an Authorized Representative (AR) (also referred to as
Authorized Organizational Representative or AOR) to determine if the
organization is prepared to submit electronic applications through
Grant.gov. If the organization is not prepared, the AR should see
<http://www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp> for steps for
preparing to submit applications through Grants.gov.

The steps to access application materials are as follows:

1.  Download and install PureEdge Viewer, a small, free program that
    provides access to the grant application. See
    <http://www.grants.gov/resources/download_software.jsp#pureedge>.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
2.  The application package must be obtained via Grants.gov, go to
    [http://www.grants.gov](http://www.grants.gov/), click on "Apply for
    Grants" in the left-hand column, click on "**Step 1:** [Download a
    Grant Application Package and
    Instructions](https://apply.grants.gov/forms_apps_idx.html)," enter
    the funding opportunity number **USDA-CSREES-ICGP-001210** in the
    appropriate box and click "Download Package." From the search
    results, click "Download" to access the application package.

> Contained within the application package is the "[CSREES Grants.gov
> Application Guide: A Guide for Preparation and Submission of CSREES
> Applications via
> Grants.gov.](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/grant_forms/electronic_app_guide.pdf)"
> This Guide contains an introduction and general Grants.gov
> instructions, information about how to use a Grant Application Package
> in Grants.gov, and instructions on how to complete the application
> forms.
>
> **If assistance is needed to access the application package** (e.g.,
> downloading or navigating PureEdge forms, using PureEdge with a
> Macintosh computer), refer to resources available on the Grants.gov
> Web site first (<http://grants.gov/>). Grants.gov assistance is also
> available as follows:

-   Grants.gov customer support\
    Toll Free: 1-800-518-4726\
    Business Hours: Monday - Friday 7:00 am -- 9:00 pm Eastern Time\
    Email: <support@grants.gov>

See <http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/electronic.html> for additional
resources for applying electronically.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696969 .anchor}B. Content and Form of
Application Submission

::: Definition-Term
Electronic applications should be prepared following Part V and VI of
the document entitled "[A Guide for Preparation and Submission of CSREES
Applications via
Grants.gov](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/grant_forms/electronic_app_guide.pdf)."
This guide is part of the corresponding application package (see Section
A. of this Part). The following is **additional information** needed in
order to prepare an application in response to this RFA. If there is
discrepancy between the two documents, the information contained in this
RFA is overriding.
:::

Note the attachment requirements (e.g., portable document format) in
Part III section 3. of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide available
with the Application Package at Grants.gov. [Any proposals containing
non-PDF documents will be at risk of being excluded from CSREES
review.]{.underline} Partial applications will be excluded from
consideration. With documented prior approval, resubmitted applications
will be accepted until close of business (COB) on the closing date in
the RFA.

**If you do not own PDF-generating software, Grants.gov provides online
tools to assist applicants. Users will find a link to "Convert Documents
to PDF" on <http://grants.gov/assets/PDFConversion.pdf>.**

**1. [SF 424 R&R Cover Sheet]{.underline}**

Information related to the questions on this form is dealt with in
detail in Part V, 2. of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.

**2. [R&R Other Project Information Form]{.underline}**

Information related to the questions on this form is dealt with in
detail in Part V, 3. of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.

a\. Field 6. Project Summary/Abstract. The summary should also include
the relevance of the project to the goals of MBT.

b\. Field 7. Project Narrative.

PLEASE NOTE: The Project Narrative shall not exceed 18 pages of
single-spaced written text including figures and tables. This maximum
has been established to ensure fair and equitable competition. The
Project Narrative must include all of the following:

(1) [Introduction]{.underline}:  Include information on the following in
    the order identified:

>  

\(a\) A concise statement of the goal(s) of the proposed project; 

\(b\) Summarize the body of knowledge or past activities that
substantiate the need for the proposed project including information
about or reference to a Critical Use Nomination;

\(c\) Describe ongoing or recently completed significant activities or
publications related to the proposed activity including the work of key
project personnel. Include preliminary data/information pertinent to the
proposed project;

\(d\) Provide estimates of the magnitude of the issues and their
relevance to stakeholders and ongoing State-Federal food and
agricultural research, education, and extension programs. Applicants
must identify and review the tactics currently being used in the
targeted CUN, then define opportunities for new approaches;

\(e\) Describe the role of stakeholders in problem identification and
implementation of results; and

\(f\) Describe the stakeholder advisory group that was consulted prior
to development of project objectives and will continue to be involved in
project evaluation throughout life of the project.

2.  [Objectives]{.underline}: 

** **

\(a\) Provide a brief review of the goal(s) stated in the Introduction;
and

\(b\) Present a clear, concise set of project objectives.

 

3.  [Methods]{.underline}:  Explicitly describe the procedures by
    objective for the proposed effort. Include:

 

\(a\) Techniques and methods to be employed, including their feasibility
and rationale for their use in this project;

\(b\) Timeline for proposed research. Applicants must provide milestones
and verifiable indicators to measure project progress;

\(c\) Means by which extension and education activities will be
evaluated. Applicants must describe plans to evaluate the outreach
component including means by which data will be analyzed and
interpreted; details of plans to communicate results to students,
stakeholders, and/or the public;

\(d\) Description of stakeholder involvement in identification of
project priorities, their implementation and adoption; and

\(e\) Description of anticipated results or expected outcomes.
Applicants must provide milestones and verifiable indicators to measure
impact across a broad range of criteria (e.g., a timeline for grower
adoption of techniques that lead to production, economic, and
environmental benefits).

4.  [Cooperation and Institutional Units Involved]{.underline}:
    Cooperative, multi-institutional and multidisciplinary applications
    are encouraged. Where applicable, identify each institutional unit
    contributing to the project and designate the lead institution or
    institutional unit. Clearly define the programmatic roles,
    responsibilities and budget for each institutional partner.

**3. [R&R Senior/Key Person Profile (Expanded)]{.underline}**

Information related to the questions on this form is dealt with in
detail in Part V, 4. of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.

**4. [R&R Personal Data]{.underline} --** As noted in Part V, 5. of the
CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide, the submission of this information
is voluntary and is not a precondition of award. PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE
THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF PROJECT DIRECTOR / PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR.

::: Definition-Term
**5. [R&R Budget]{.underline}**
:::

Information related to the questions on this form is dealt with in
detail in Part V, 6. of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.

a\. Beginning in the second year of funding, at least one member of the
project team will be required to attend an annual International Methyl
Bromide Alternatives Conference (<http://www.mbao.org/>). Reasonable
travel expenses may be claimed as part of the project budget.

b\. Matching**.** If an applicant concludes that matching funds are not
required as specified under Part III, B. Cost-sharing or matching, a
justification should be included in the budget justification. CSREES
will consider this justification when ascertaining final matching
requirements or in determining if required matching can be waived.
CSREES retains the right to make final determinations regarding matching
requirements.

For those grants requiring matching funds, the budget narrative should
include written verification of commitments of matching support
(including both cash and in-kind contributions) from third parties.
Written verification means:

\(a\) For any third party cash contributions, a separate pledge
agreement for each donation, signed by the authorized representatives of
the donor organization and the applicant organization, which must
include: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the donor; (2)
the name of the applicant organization; (3) the title of the project for
which the donation is made; (4) the dollar amount of the cash donation;
and (5) a statement that the donor will pay the cash contribution during
the grant period; and (b) For any third party in-kind contributions, a
separate pledge agreement for each contribution, signed by the
authorized representatives of the donor organization and the applicant
organization, which must include: (1) The name, address, and telephone
number of the donor; (2) the name of the applicant organization; (3) the
title of the project for which the donation is made; (4) a good faith
estimate of the current fair market value of the third party in kind
contribution; and (5) a statement that the donor will make the
contribution during the grant period.

The sources and amount of all matching support from outside the
applicant institution should be summarized on a separate page and placed
in the proposal as part of the Budget Narrative. All pledge agreements
must be placed in the proposal immediately following the summary of
matching support.

The value of applicant contributions to the project shall be established
in accordance with applicable cost principles. Applicants should refer
to OMB Circular A-21, Cost Principles for Educational Institutions, for
further guidance and other requirements relating to matching and
allowable costs.

6\. [Supplemental Information Form]{.underline}

Information related to the questions on this form is dealt with in
detail in Part VI, 1. of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.

a\. Field 2. Program Code. Enter the program code name "**Methyl Bromide
Transitions**" and the program code "**112.C**".

b\. Field 8. Conflict of Interest List.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696970 .anchor}C. Submission Dates and Times

**Instructions for submitting an application are included in Part IV,
Section 1.9 of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.**

Applications must be received by Grants.gov by COB on **February 22,
2008 (5:00 p.m. Eastern Time)**. Applications received after this
deadline will normally not be considered for funding.

Correspondence regarding submitted applications will be sent using
e-mail. Therefore, applicants are strongly encouraged to provide
accurate e-mail addresses, where designated, on the SF-424 R&R
Application for Federal Assistance.

If the AR has not received correspondence **from CSREES** regarding a
submitted application within 30 days of submission of the application,
please contact the Program Contact identified in Part VII of the
applicable RFA and request the proposal number assigned to the
application. **Failure to do so may result in the application not being
considered for funding by the peer review panel.   Once the application
has been assigned a proposal number, this number should be cited on all
future correspondence.**

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696971 .anchor}D. Funding Restrictions

For FY 2007, sections 101 (a) and (c) of the Revised Continuing
Appropriation Resolutions, 2007 (Pub. L. 110-5), limited indirect costs
to 20 percent of the total Federal funds provided under each award. 
CSREES anticipates that the FY 2008 Appropriations Act will include a
similar limitation.  Therefore, when preparing budgets, applicants
should limit their requests for recovery of indirect costs to the lesser
of their institution's official negotiated indirect cost rate or the
equivalent of 20 percent of total federal funds awarded.  Another method
of calculating the maximum allowable is 25 percent of the total direct
costs.  If no rate has been negotiated, a reasonable dollar amount
(equivalent to or less than 20 percent of total Federal funds requested)
in lieu of indirect costs may be requested, subject to approval by USDA.
This same indirect cost limitation applies to subcontracts.

Please note that if the 2008 Appropriations Act contains a different
indirect cost limitation CSREES will contact each successful applicant
to apply the correct rate prior to the award of a grant. 

CSREES has determined that grant funds awarded under this authority may
not be used for the renovation or refurbishment of research, education,
or extension space; the purchase or installation of fixed equipment in
such space; or the planning, repair, rehabilitation, acquisition, or
construction of buildings or facilities.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696972 .anchor}E. Other Submission Requirements

The applicant should follow the submission requirements noted in the
document entitled "A Guide for Preparation and Submission of CSREES
Applications via Grants.gov."

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696973 .anchor}PART V---APPLICATION REVIEW
REQUIREMENTS

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696974 .anchor}A. General

Each application will be evaluated in a 2-part process. First, each
application will be screened to ensure that it meets the administrative
requirements as set forth in this RFA. Second, applications that meet
these requirements will be technically evaluated by a review panel.

Reviewers will be selected based upon training and experience in
relevant scientific, extension, or education fields, taking into account
the following factors: (a) The level of relevant formal scientific,
technical education, or extension experience of the individual, as well
as the extent to which an individual is engaged in relevant research,
education, or extension activities; (b) the need to include as reviewers
experts from various areas of specialization within relevant scientific,
education, or extension fields; (c) the need to include as reviewers
other experts (e.g., producers, range or forest managers/operators, and
consumers) who can assess relevance of the applications to targeted
audiences and to program needs; (d) the need to include as reviewers
experts from a variety of organizational types (e.g., colleges,
universities, industry, state and Federal agencies, private profit and
non-profit organizations) and geographic locations; (e) the need to
maintain a balanced composition of reviewers with regard to minority and
female representation and an equitable age distribution; and (f) the
need to include reviewers who can judge the effective usefulness to
producers and the general public of each application.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696975 .anchor}B. Evaluation Criteria

The evaluation criteria below will be used in reviewing applications
submitted in response to this RFA:

**1.  Proposal Merit and Quality (37 points):**

(a) Proposed project goal, approach, or hypothesis is conceptually
    adequate and addresses a stated program priority. Application
    includes documentation substantiating that project is directed to
    methyl bromide critical use nominations. (6 points)

(b) Need for proposed project is demonstrated and target audience(s)
    identified. (5 points)

(c) Objectives are clearly described, adequate, and appropriate for
    research, education, and extension, as appropriate. All project
    functions (i.e., research, education, extension) are reflected in
    one or more project objectives. (5 points)

(d) Proposed techniques, procedures, or methodologies are clearly
    described, suitable, and feasible for proposed project. (4 points)

(e) Time allotted for attainment of objectives is reasonable. Promising
    alternatives to methyl bromide must be evaluated under commercial
    conditions for multiple years to insure that positive results are
    not due, in part, to a low pest pressure soil environment following
    many years of methyl bromide fumigation. Also, weather conditions
    have a marked influence on pest pressure. Alternatives that give
    acceptable efficacy under favorable weather and soil conditions may
    fail in other years when weather and soil conditions are less
    favorable. The potential for emergence of unexpected pests and
    pathogens, in the absence of methyl bromide, must be determined.
    Performance must be consistent over several production cycles and be
    technically and economically feasible when scaled-up from
    research-scale plots to commercial-scale fields. As alternatives
    become available, researchers need time to test application methods
    to gain experience and confidence using an alternative to
    consistently produce nursery stock that meets certified pest- and
    pathogen-free requirements. (4 points)

(f) Expected results or outcomes are clearly stated, measurable, and
    achievable within the time frame of the project. State the potential
    commercial application of the proposed alternative methods and
    quantify methyl bromide use that might be replaced by the
    alternative methods. The proposal must include the potential
    timeline for replacement of the current critical use by the
    alternative methods proposed. (5 points)

(g) Articulation of a clear plan for managing the project, including how
    communication among members of the project team will be handled. (4
    points)

(h) The project's implementation plan is clearly defined with
    appropriate educational activities for encouraging implementation of
    research results. This includes an appropriate mix of educational
    experiences ranging from awareness building to in-depth educational
    programs. Formal extension and/or education programs to expedite
    adoption of proposed alternatives must be delineated in the form of
    a measurable, outcome oriented plan in the proposal. Such programs
    must take place within the life of the project. (4 points)

 **2.  Qualifications of Proposed Project Personnel, Adequacy of
Facilities and Budget (27 points)**:

(a) Roles of project personnel are clearly defined. (5 points)

(b) Evidence that project personnel have sufficient expertise to
    complete the proposed project is provided. Necessary expertise
    includes individuals with experience in technology transfer and
    educational program delivery. (4 points)

(c) Evidence of quality partnerships with other disciplines and
    institutions is provided, where appropriate. (5 points)

(d) Evidence is provided of institutional experience and competence in
    the proposed area of work. (4 points)

(e) Support personnel, facilities, and instrumentation are adequate. (4
    points)

(f) Proposed budget is appropriate for the scope of the proposed project
    and allocates reasonable resources to at least two of the three
    mission areas of CSREES (research, education, extension). Generally,
    no more than two thirds of the project's budget should be devoted to
    any one mission area. If a project is funded, beginning in the
    second year of funding, at least one member of the project team will
    be required to attend an annual International Methyl Bromide
    Alternatives Conference
    ([http://www.mbao.org/](http://www.mbao.org/ ) ). Reasonable travel
    expenses may be claimed as part of the project budget. (5 points)

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
3.  **Proposal Relevance and Effectiveness (36 points)**

\(a\) Degree to which the project functions (research, education,
extension) are integrated and necessary to address the stated problem or
issue and achieve measurable outcomes. (5 points)

Integrated projects should include research, education, and
extension/outreach objectives (at least two of three). These include: a)
hypothesis-driven research to fill knowledge gaps that are critical to
the development of practices and programs to address the problem area;
b) create educational deliverables (e.g., interdisciplinary curricula
and/or experiential learning for graduate and undergraduate students)
that will train the next generation of scientists and educators who will
work in the problem area; and/or c) deliver an effective
extension/outreach program that will lead to measurable behavior change
in an identified audience or stakeholder group. The MBT encourages
projects that develop content suitable for delivery through eXtension.
This content is for "end users" as opposed to staff development and must
align with the eXtension Guiding Principles, Implementation Plan and
other requirements as presented at the site
[http://intranet.extension.org](http://intranet.extension.org/).  Funds
may be used to contribute to an existing Community of Practice with a
methyl bromide alternatives component or to form a new Community of
Practice with a focus on methyl bromide alternatives education and
outreach activities.

\(b\) Extent to which the proposed work addresses identified stakeholder
needs. Focus on commercial or field scale research targeting short- to
medium-term solutions that will develop new alternatives or result in
registration and application of new alternatives or that minimize methyl
bromide emissions, and contain comprehensive information on the impact
of alternatives on crop yields and profit margins. Repeat of research
for two or more cropping seasons or trials is encouraged. (5 points)

\(c\) Extent to which stakeholders and/or end users were/will be
involved in problem identification, planning, implementation, and
evaluation. Project should include a management plan (developed with
input from stakeholder advisory groups) that leads to measurable
improvements in the problem area. Documentation of interaction is
expected in the proposal. (5 points)

\(d\) Suitability and feasibility of plan and methods for evaluating
success of project activities (i.e. measurable outcomes) and documenting
potential impact. (5 points)

\(e\) Probability that project results will reach beyond the project
scale and duration, producing sustained education/extension initiatives.
(4 points)

\(f\) For research, likelihood that it will fill knowledge gaps that are
critical to the development of practices and programs to address the
stated problem or issue. (4 points)

(g) For extension, assessment of the degree to which the project will
    lead to measurable behavior change in an identified audience or
    stakeholder group in the problem area. (4 points)

(h) For education, likelihood that the project will have an impact upon
    and advance the quality of food and agricultural sciences by
    strengthening institutional capacities to meet clearly delineated
    needs and train the next generation of scientists and educators who
    will work in the problem or issue area. (4 points)

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696976 .anchor}C. Conflicts of Interest and
Confidentiality

During the peer evaluation process, extreme care will be taken to
prevent any actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may impact
review or evaluation. For the purpose of determining conflicts of
interest, the academic and administrative autonomy of an institution
shall be determined by reference to the current Higher Education
Directory, published by Higher Education Publications, Inc., 6400
Arlington Boulevard, Suite 648, Falls Church, Virginia 22042. Phone:
(703) 532-2300. Web site:
[[http://www.hepinc.com]{.underline}](http://www.hepinc.com/).

Names of submitting institutions and individuals, as well as application
content and peer evaluations, will be kept confidential, except to those
involved in the review process, to the extent permitted by law. In
addition, the identities of peer reviewers will remain confidential
throughout the entire review process. Therefore, the names of the
reviewers will not be released to applicants.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696977 .anchor}D. Organizational Management
Information

Specific management information relating to an applicant shall be
submitted on a one time basis, with updates on an as needed basis, as
part of the responsibility determination prior to the award of a grant
identified under this RFA, if such information has not been provided
previously under this or another CSREES program. CSREES will provide
copies of forms recommended for use in fulfilling these requirements as
part of the preaward process. Although an applicant may be eligible
based on its status as one of these entities, there are factors which
may exclude an applicant from receiving Federal financial and
nonfinancial assistance and benefits under this program (e.g., debarment
or suspension of an individual involved or a determination that an
applicant is not responsible based on submitted organizational
management information).

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696978 .anchor}PART VI---AWARD ADMINISTRATION

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696979 .anchor}A. General

Within the limit of funds available for such purpose, the awarding
official of CSREES shall make grants to those responsible, eligible
applicants whose applications are judged most meritorious under the
procedures set forth in this RFA. The date specified by the awarding
official of CSREES as the effective date of the grant shall be no later
than September 30 of the Federal fiscal year in which the project is
approved for support and funds are appropriated for such purpose, unless
otherwise permitted by law. It should be noted that the project need not
be initiated on the grant effective date, but as soon thereafter as
practical so that project goals may be attained within the funded
project period. All funds granted by CSREES under this RFA shall be
expended solely for the purpose for which the funds are granted in
accordance with the approved application and budget, the regulations,
the terms and conditions of the award, the applicable Federal cost
principles, and the Department\'s assistance regulations (parts 3015 and
3019 of 7 CFR).

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696980 .anchor}B. Award Notice

The award document will provide pertinent instructions and information
including, at a minimum, the following:

\(1\) Legal name and address of performing organization or institution
to whom the Administrator has issued an award under the terms of this
request for applications;

\(2\) Title of project;

\(3\) Name(s) and institution(s) of PDs chosen to direct and control
approved activities;

\(4\) Identifying award number assigned by the Department;

\(5\) Project period, specifying the amount of time the Department
intends to support the project without requiring recompetition for
funds;

\(6\) Total amount of Departmental financial assistance approved by the
Administrator during the project period;

\(7\) Legal authority(ies) under which the award is issued;

\(8\) Appropriate Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number;

\(9\) Applicable award terms and conditions (see
<http://www.csrees.usda.gov/business/awards/awardterms.html> to view
CSREES award terms and conditions);

\(10\) Approved budget plan for categorizing allocable project funds to
accomplish the stated purpose of the award; and

\(11\) Other information or provisions deemed necessary by CSREES to
carry out its respective awarding activities or to accomplish the
purpose of a particular award.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696981 .anchor}C. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements

Several Federal statutes and regulations apply to grant applications
considered for review and to project grants awarded under this program.
These include, but are not limited to:

7 CFR Part 1, subpart A**---**USDA implementation of the Freedom of
Information Act.

7 CFR Part 3**---**USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-129
regarding debt collection.

7 CFR Part 15, subpart A**---**USDA implementation of Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.

7 CFR Part 331 and 9 CFR Part 121**---**USDA implementation of the
Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002.

7 CFR Part 3015**---**USDA Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations,
implementing OMB directives (i.e., OMB Circular Nos. A-21 and A-122, now
codified at 2 CFR Parts 220 and 230) and incorporating provisions of 31
U.S.C. 6301-6308 (formerly the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement
Act of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-224), as well as general policy requirements
applicable to recipients of Departmental financial assistance.

7 CFR Part 3017**---**USDA implementation of Governmentwide Debarment
and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and 7 CFR Part 3021**---**Governmentwide
Requirements for Drug Free Workplace (Grants).

7 CFR Part 3018**---**USDA implementation of Restrictions on Lobbying.
Imposes prohibitions and requirements for disclosure and certification
related to lobbying on recipients of Federal contracts, grants,
cooperative agreements, and loans.

7 CFR Part 3019**---**USDA implementation of OMB Circular A-110, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agreements With
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
Organizations.

7 CFR Part 3052**---**USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-133,
Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non profit Organizations.

7 CFR Part 3407**---**CSREES procedures to implement the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended.

29 U.S.C. 794 (section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and 7 CFR Part
15b (USDA implementation of statute) **---**prohibiting discrimination
based upon physical or mental handicap in Federally assisted programs.

35 U.S.C. 200 et seq. **---**Bayh Dole Act, controlling allocation of
rights to inventions made by employees of small business firms and
domestic nonprofit organizations, including universities, in Federally
assisted programs (implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR Part
401).

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696982 .anchor}D. Expected Program Outputs and
Reporting Requirements

Grantees are required to submit initial project information and annual
and summary reports to CSREES' Current Research Information System
(CRIS). The CRIS database contains narrative project information,
progress/impact statements, and final technical reports that are made
available to the public. For applications recommended for funding,
instructions on preparing and submission of project documentation will
be provided to the applicant by the agency contact. Documentation must
be submitted to CRIS before CSREES funds will be released. Project
reports will be requested by the CRIS office when required. For more
information about CRIS, visit
[http://cris.csrees.usda.gov](http://cris.csrees.usda.gov/).
Requirements may be found in the CSREES General Terms and Conditions
referenced in the award notification. 

Beginning in the second year of funding, at least one member of the
project team will be required to attend an annual International Methyl
Bromide Alternatives Conference
([http://www.mbao.org/](http://www.mbao.org/ ) ). Reasonable travel
expenses may be claimed as part of the project budget.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696983 .anchor}**PART VII---AGENCY CONTACT**

Applicants and other interested parties are encouraged to contact
William Hoffman; National Program Leader, Plant and Animal Systems Unit;
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; USDA; STOP
2220; 1400 Independence Ave., SW; Washington, DC 20250-2220; telephone:
(202) 401-1112; fax: (202) 401-4888;e-mail: <whoffman@csrees.usda.gov>.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696984 .anchor}PART VIII---OTHER INFORMATION

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696985 .anchor}A. Access to Review Information

Copies of reviews, not including the identity of reviewers, and a
summary of the panel comments will be sent to the applicant PD after the
review process has been completed.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696986 .anchor}B. Use of Funds; Changes

**1. [Delegation of Fiscal Responsibility]{.underline}**

Unless the terms and conditions of the award state otherwise, the
awardee may not in whole or in part delegate or transfer to another
person, institution, or organization the responsibility for use or
expenditure of award funds.

**2. [Changes in Project Plans]{.underline}**\
\
a. The permissible changes by the awardee, PD(s), or other key project
personnel in the approved project shall be limited to changes in
methodology, techniques, or other similar aspects of the project to
expedite achievement of the project\'s approved goals. If the awardee or
the PD(s) is uncertain as to whether a change complies with this
provision, the question must be referred to the Authorized Departmental
Officer (ADO) for a final determination. The ADO is the signatory of the
award document, not the program contact.

b\. Changes in approved goals or objectives shall be requested by the
awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to effecting such
changes. In no event shall requests for such changes be approved which
are outside the scope of the original approved project.

c\. Changes in approved project leadership or the replacement or
reassignment of other key project personnel shall be requested by the
awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to effecting such
changes.

d\. Transfers of actual performance of the substantive programmatic work
in whole or in part and provisions for payment of funds, whether or not
Federal funds are involved, shall be requested by the awardee and
approved in writing by the ADO prior to effecting such transfers, unless
prescribed otherwise in the terms and conditions of the award.

e\. The project period may be extended by CSREES without additional
financial support, for such additional period(s) as the ADO determines
may be necessary to complete or fulfill the purposes of an approved
project, but in no case shall the total project period exceed five
years. Any extension of time shall be conditioned upon prior request by
the awardee and approval in writing by the ADO, unless prescribed
otherwise in the terms and conditions of award.

f\. Changes in Approved Budget: Unless stated otherwise in the terms and
conditions of award, changes in an approved budget must be requested by
the awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to instituting such
changes if the revision will involve transfers or expenditures of
amounts requiring prior approval as set forth in the applicable Federal
cost principles, Departmental regulations, or award.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696987 .anchor}C. Confidential Aspects of
Applications and Awards

When an application results in an award, it becomes a part of the record
of CSREES transactions, available to the public upon specific request.
Information that the Secretary determines to be of a confidential,
privileged, or proprietary nature will be held in confidence to the
extent permitted by law. Therefore, any information that the applicant
wishes to have considered as confidential, privileged, or proprietary
should be clearly marked within the application. The original copy of an
application that does not result in an award will be retained by the
Agency for a period of three years. Other copies will be destroyed. Such
an application will be released only with the consent of the applicant
or to the extent required by law. An application may be withdrawn at any
time prior to the final action thereon.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696988 .anchor}D. Regulatory Information

For the reasons set forth in the final Rule related Notice to 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V (48 FR 29114, June 24, 1983), this program is excluded
from the scope of the Executive Order 12372 which requires
intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials. Under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter
35), the collection of information requirements contained in this Notice
have been approved under OMB Document No. 0524-0039.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696989 .anchor}E. Definitions

For the purpose of this program, the following definitions are
applicable:

[1994 Institution or 1994 Land-Grant Institution]{.underline} means one
of those institutions as defined in section 532 of the Equity in
Educational Land‑Grant Status Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 301 note) as
amended. These institutions are commonly referred to as Tribal Colleges
or Tribal Universities.

[Administrator]{.underline} means the Administrator of the Cooperative
State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) and any other
officer or employee of the Department to whom the authority involved is
delegated.

[Authorized departmental officer]{.underline} means the Secretary or any
employee of the Department who has the authority to issue or modify
grant instruments on behalf of the Secretary.

[Authorized representative]{.underline} means the president, director,
or chief executive officer or other designated official of the applicant
organization who has the authority to commit the resources of the
organization.

[Budget period]{.underline} means the interval of time (usually 12
months) into which the project period is divided for budgetary and
reporting purposes.

[Cash contributions]{.underline} means the applicants cash outlay,
including the outlay of money contributed to the applicant by
non-Federal third parties.

[Department or USDA]{.underline} means the United States Department of
Agriculture.

[Education activity]{.underline} means formal classroom instruction,
laboratory instruction, and practicum experience in the food and
agricultural sciences and other related matters such as faculty
development, student recruitment and services, curriculum development,
instructional materials and equipment, and innovative teaching
methodologies.

[Extension activity]{.underline} means an act or process that delivers
science-based knowledge and informal educational programs to people,
enabling them to make practical decisions.

[Grant]{.underline} means the award by the Secretary of funds to an
eligible organization or individual to assist in meeting the costs of
conducting, for the benefit of the public, an identified project which
is intended and designed to accomplish the purpose of the program as
identified in these guidelines.

[Grantee]{.underline} means an organization designated in the grant
award document as the responsible legal entity to which a grant is
awarded.

[Integrated]{.underline} means to bring the three components of the
agricultural knowledge system (research, education, and extension)
together around a problem area or activity.

[Matching]{.underline} means that portion of allowable project costs not
borne by the Federal Government, including the value of in-kind
contributions.

[Peer review]{.underline} means an evaluation of a proposed project for
scientific or technical quality and relevance performed by experts with
the scientific knowledge and technical skills to conduct the proposed
work or to give expert advice on the merits of a proposal.\
\
[Prior approval]{.underline} means written approval evidencing prior
consent by an authorized departmental officer as defined above.

[Project]{.underline} means the particular activity within the scope of
the program supported by a grant award.

[Project director]{.underline} means the single individual designated in
the grant application and approved by the Secretary who is responsible
for the direction and management of the project.

[Project period]{.underline} means the period, as stated in the award
document, during which Federal sponsorship begins and ends.

[Research activity]{.underline} means a scientific investigation or
inquiry that results in the generation of knowledge.

[Secretary]{.underline} means the Secretary of Agriculture and any other
officer or employee of the Department to whom the authority involved is
delegated.

[Third party in kind contributions]{.underline} means non cash
contributions of property or services provided by non Federal third
parties, including real property, equipment, supplies and other
expendable property, directly benefitting and specifically identifiable
to a funded project or program.

[Total integrated, multifunctional research, education, and extension
approach]{.underline} means that the combination of grants (although the
individual grants may involve only research, education, or extension
activities or a combination thereof) awarded under the fiscal years
program components will work together to address the priorities in
United States agriculture as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture
in consultation with the Advisory Board, that involve integrated
research, extension, and education activities.

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc184696990 .anchor}Electronic Application Checklist

Only electronic applications may be submitted to CSREES via Grants.gov
unless indicated otherwise in the specific program Request for
Applications (RFA). All applications submitted to CSREES must contain
the applicable elements outlined in these guidelines. The following
checklist has been prepared to assist in ensuring that the application
is complete prior to submission:

� **Have you followed the guidelines for filling out your electronic
application provided in the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide, which
is posted along with the electronic SF 424 R&R application package on
Grants.gov?** Electronic applications should be prepared according to
this guide and the specific program RFA. This guide is part of the
corresponding electronic application package for the specific program to
which you are applying.

� **Has your institution properly registered with Grants.gov to enable
you to submit an application?** Those who wish to submit an application
to CSREES should first contact their Authorized Representative (AR) to
determine if the organization is prepared to submit applications through
Grants.gov. See <http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted> for steps for
preparing to submit applications through Grants.gov.

� **Have all attachments been submitted in the portable document format
(PDF)?** CSREES will only accept PDF attachments. See Part III of the
CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide.

� **Do all submitted PDF documents have one-inch margins and are typed
or word processed using no type smaller than 12 point regardless of line
spacing? Are all PDF documents numbered sequentially on each page of the
attachment? Are all page limitations for a given attachment followed?**
Submitted proposals that do not meet these requirements for PDF
attachments will not be accepted.

� **Did you use the "Check Package for Errors" feature (see section 1.8
of the CSREES Grants.gov Application Guide)?**

� **Have all required components of the SF 424 Research and Related
(R&R) Application Package posted under the funding opportunity on
Grants.gov been completed?**

� **[SF 424 R&R Cover Sheet]{.underline}**

-   Have all required fields (highlighted in yellow) been completed?

� [R&R Other Project Information]{.underline}

-   Have the fields describing project potential or actual environmental
    impact been properly completed?

> [Project Summary/Abstract]{.underline}

-   Has the Project Summary PDF been attached to this form in Field 6?

-   Are the names and affiliated organizations of all Project Directors
    listed at the top of the page in addition to the title of the
    project?

-   Does this section adhere to the format and page limitations?

-   Did you use the suggested Project Summary/Abstract Template found
    at:
    [www.csrees.usda.gov/home/faq_apply.html#abstract](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/home/faq_apply.html#abstract)?

> [Project Narrative]{.underline}

-   Has the Project Narrative PDF been attached to this form in Field 7?

-   Is the project fully described?

> [Bibliography & References Cited]{.underline}

-   Has the Bibliography & References Cited PDF been attached to this
    form in Field 8?

-   Are all references cited and are all citations referenced?

-   Do all citations contain a title, the names of all authors, and are
    they in accepted journal format?

> [Facilities & Other Resources]{.underline}

-   Has the Facilities & Other Resources PDF been attached to this form
    in Field 9?

-   Has a description of your facilities, sufficient to indicate that
    you will be able to carry out this project, been given?

> [Equipment]{.underline}

-   Has the Equipment PDF been attached to this form in Field 10?

-   Is the description of your equipment sufficient to indicate that you
    will be able to carry out this project?

> [Response to Previous Review]{.underline} (for resubmitted
> applications only)

-   Has the Response to Previous Review PDF been included as indicated
    in the RFA?

-   Has the application been clearly and meaningfully revised and are
    the revisions briefly described?

-   Are comments from the previous review addressed?

� [R&R Senior/Key Person Profile]{.underline}

> [Biographical Sketch]{.underline}

-   Has the biographical sketch (vitae) PDF for the PD and each co-PD,
    senior associate, and other professional personnel been attached?

> [Current and Pending Support]{.underline}

-   Has the current and pending support PDF for key personnel been
    attached?

-   Have all current and pending projects been listed and summarized,
    **including this proposal**?

-   Did you use the suggested Current and Pending Support Template found
    at:
    [www.csrees.usda.gov/home/faq_apply.html#current](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/home/faq_apply.html#current)?

� [R&R Personal Data]{.underline} (Optional)

-   As noted in Part V, 5., the submission of this information is
    voluntary and is not a precondition of award. PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE
    THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF PROJECT DIRECTOR / PRINCIPAL
    INVESTIGATOR.

� [R&R Budget]{.underline}

-   ::: Definition-Term
    Have all fields been completed for each PD and co-PD(s)?
    :::

-   Are annual and summary budgets included? For multi-institution
    applications, has a subaward budget been included for each
    institution involved?

> [Budget Justification]{.underline}

-   Has the Budget Justification PDF been attached to this form in Field
    K?

-   Are budget items individually justified?

-   For multi-institutional applications, has a subaward budget
    justification been included for each institution involved?

-   Have any matching requirements been addressed, if applicable?

� [CSREES Supplemental Information Form]{.underline}

-   Has Field 1 been pre-populated?

-   Does Field 2 indicate the Program Code Name and Program Code to
    which you are applying?

> [Conflict of Interest List]{.underline}

-   Has the Conflict of Interest List PDF been attached to this form in
    Field 8?

-   Has a Conflict of Interest List been provided for all individuals
    who have submitted a Biographical Sketch?

-   Does the Conflict of Interest list include the four categories as
    appropriate?

-   Did you use the suggested Conflict of Interest Template found at:
    [www.csrees.usda.gov/home/faq_apply.html#coi](http://www.csrees.usda.gov/home/faq_apply.html#coi)?