**U.S. Department of Education**

**SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH PROGRAM**

**Phase I**

**REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL**

**RFP Number: ED-99-Q-0002**

**ISSUE DATE:**

**February 1, 1999**

**CLOSING DATE:**

**April 9, 1999 (2:00 P.M. EDT)**

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

**PAGE**

**SECTION NUMBER**

1.0 Program Description
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\.....
1

2.0 Definitions
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...
4

3.0 Proposal Preparation Instructions and Requirements
\...\...\...\...\...\...\..... 5

4.0 Method of Selection and Evaluation Criteria
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\..... 11

5.0 Considerations
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...
14

6.0 Submission of Proposals
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\.....
20

7.0 Scientific and Technical Information Sources
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\... 22

8.0 Research Topics
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...
23

9.0 Points of Contact for Technical Topics
\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\...\..... 30

**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION**

**PROGRAM SOLICITATION**

**FOR**

**SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)**

**FY 1999**

**1.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION**

**1.1 [Introduction]{.underline}**

The **U.S. Department of Education (ED)** invites small business firms
to submit research proposals under this program solicitation entitled
**Small Business Innovation Research** **(SBIR)**. Firms with strong
research capabilities in educational technology, science, or engineering
in any of the topic areas listed below are encouraged to participate.
Consultative or other arrangements between such firms and universities
or other non‑profit organizations are permitted with the small business
serving as the prime contractor.[^1]

Objectives of this solicitation include stimulating technological
innovation in the private sector, strengthening the role of small
business in meeting Federal research and development (R&D) needs,
increasing the commercial application of ED‑supported research results,
and improving the return on investment from Federally-funded research
for economic and social benefits to the Nation.

**This solicitation is for Phase I proposals only.**

**Please note, the Department of Education has the sole discretion to
select SBIR topics and awardees, and to make several or no awards under
a given topic. Furthermore, ED is not responsible for any monies
expended by the offeror**

**before the award of any funding agreement.**

**1.2 [SBIR Program Description]{.underline}**

15 U.S.C. 638, P.L. 102-564, the "Small Business Research and
Development Enhancement Act of 1992" (the "Act") was enacted on October
28, 1992. The Act requires certain agencies, including the Department of
Education, to establish SBIR programs by reserving a statutory
percentage of their extramural research and development budgets to be
awarded to small business concerns for research or R&D through a
uniform, highly competitive three-phase process, as described below.

**[Phase I.]{.underline}** \-- Phase I is to determine, insofar as
possible, the scientific or technical merit and feasibility of ideas
submitted under the SBIR program. The proposal should concentrate on
research that will significantly contribute to proving the scientific or
technical feasibility of the approach or concept and that would be
prerequisite to further ED support in Phase II. Proposals are evaluated
based on criteria published in this solicitation *(Section 4.3, page
13)* by panels of expert reviewers. Awards are for periods **up to six
(6) months** in amounts up to **\$50,000**. For FY 1999, ED anticipates
making approximately thirty (30) awards.

Since the ED award is limited to \$50,000, the Department uses the
Simplified Acquisition Procedures to make these awards using purchase
orders. This method helps to expedite the awards process.

**[Phase II.]{.underline}** \-- Phase II is to expand on the results of
and to further pursue the development of Phase I. Phase II is the
principal research or R&D effort. It requires a more comprehensive
proposal, outlining the effort in detail including the commercial
potential. Phase II applicants must be Phase I awardees with approaches
that appear sufficiently promising as a result of Phase I. Once again,
proposals are evaluated based on published criteria by panels of
experts. The Phase II funding vehicle is a contract.

Awards are for periods **up to two (2) years** in amounts up to
**\$300,000**.

**[Phase III.]{.underline}** \-- It is intended that under Phase III
non-Federal capital be used by the small business to pursue commercial
applications of the research or research and development. Also, under
Phase III, Federal agencies may award non-SBIR follow-on funding for
products or processes that meet the needs of those agencies.

Both Phase I and Phase II awards may include a profit or fee.

**1.3 [Eligibility and Limitations]{.underline}**

**[Eligibility]{.underline}**. \-- Each organization submitting a
proposal **must** qualify as a **small** **business** for research
purposes as defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) **at the
time of the award**. In addition, the primary employment of the
principal investigator **must** be with the small business firm at the
time of award and during the conduct of the proposed research. That is,
more than one-half of the principal investigator's working time must be
spent with the small business firm during the period of performance.
Also, for both Phase I and Phase II the research or R&D work **must** be
performed in the United States. "United States" means the fifty (50)
states, the territories and possessions of the United States, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the District of
Columbia. A more comprehensive discussion is contained in section on
"Screening Criteria" *(Section 4.2, pages 12-13).*

Joint ventures are permitted, provided that the entity created qualifies
as a small business in accordance with the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
631 \[the definition for "small business concern" is included in section
2.2 (*page 4 )*\].

**[Limitations]{.underline}**. \-- A proposal must be limited to one
topic listed in this program solicitation. When a proposal is relevant
to more than one topic, the offeror must decide which topic is most
relevant and submit it under that topic only. However, there is no
limitation on the number of different proposals that a small business
may submit under this solicitation, even to the same topic. A firm may
submit separate proposals on differ­ent topics, or different proposals on
the same topic, but each proposal must respond to exactly one topic.
Duplicate proposals will be returned without review.

**1.4 [Agency Contacts]{.underline}**

Questions about technical aspects of the ED SBIR program, but not
pertaining to administrative processing of solicitations, can be
submitted to:

> Lee Eiden
>
> ED SBIR Program Coordinator
>
> US Department of Education
>
> Capitol Place - Room 508D
>
> 555 New Jersey Avenue, N.W.
>
> Washington, D.C. 20208
>
> or by telephone at (202) 219-2004.

Questions pertaining to the administrative processing of the
solicitation shall be directed to:

Topics 1-4 Sang Park

Contract Specialist

\(202\) 708-8222

Topics 5-9 Candace Bertotti

Contract Specialist

\(202\) 708-9741

Topics 10-11 Nadine Kim

Contract Specialist

\(202\) 260-1679

Program Office contacts for each R&D topic are provided in Section 9.0
*(page 30)*.

**2.0 DEFINITIONS**

**2.1 [Research or Research and Development (R/R&D)]{.underline}**

> Any activity that is:

1.  A systematic intensive study directed toward greater knowledge or
    understanding of the subject studied.

2.  A systematic study directed specifically toward applying new
    knowledge to meet a recognized need.

3.  A systematic application of knowledge toward the production of
    useful materials, devices and systems or methods, including design,
    development, and improvement of prototypes and new processes to meet
    specific requirements.

**2.2 [Small Business Concern]{.underline}**

> A small business concern is one that, at the time of Phase I and Phase
> II funding agreements, meets the following criteria:

1.  Is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in the field of
    operation in which it is proposing, and has its principal place of
    business located in the United States;

2.  Is at least 51 percent owned, or in the case of a publicly-owned
    business, at least 51 percent of its voting stock is owned by United
    States citizens or lawfully admitted permanent resident aliens;

3.  Has, including its affiliates, [a number of employees not exceeding
    500]{.underline}, and meets the other regulatory requirements found
    in 13 CFR part 121. Business concerns, other than investment
    companies licensed, or state development companies qualifying under
    the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C. 661,
    [et.seq]{.underline}., are affiliates of one another when either
    directly or indirectly:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
a)  one concern controls or has the power to control the other; or

b)  a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both.

> Control can be exercised through common ownership, common management,
> and contractual relationships. The term "affiliates" is defined in
> greater detail in 13 CFR 121.3-2(a). The term "number of employees" is
> defined in 13 CFR 121.3-2(t). Business concerns include, but are not
> limited to, any individual, partnership, corporation, joint venture,
> association or cooperative.

**2.3 [Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Small Business
Concern]{.underline}**

A socially and economically disadvantaged small business concern is one:

\(a\) that is at least 51 percent owned by:

\(i\) an Indian tribe or a native Hawaiian organization, or

\(ii\) one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals;

and;

> \(b\) those management and daily business operations are controlled by
> one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. A
> socially and economically disadvantaged individual is defined as a
> member of any of the following groups: Black Americans; Hispanic
> Americans; Native Americans; Asian-Pacific Americans; Subcontinent
> Asian Americans; other groups designated from time to time by the
> Small Business Administration (SBA) to be socially disadvantaged; or
> any other individual found to be socially and economically
> disadvantaged by SBA pursuant to section 8(a) of the Small Business
> Act, 15 U.S.C. 637(a).

**2.4 [Woman-Owned Small Business Concern]{.underline}**

A small business that is at least 51 percent owned by a woman or women
who also control and operate it. "Control" in this context means
exercising the power to make policy decisions. "Operate" in this context
means being actively involved in the day-to-day management.

**2.5 [Subcontract]{.underline}**

Any agreement, other than one involving an employer-employee
relationship, entered into by a Federal Government funding agreement
awardee calling for supplies or services required solely for the
performance of the original funding agreement.

**2.6 [Equivalent]{.underline}**

Equal in value, force, measure, volume, power and effect or having equal
or corresponding impact, meaning or significance.

**2.7 [Essentially]{.underline}**

The quality or qualities of a thing that give it its identity; the
intrinsic or indispensable properties of a thing.

**3.0 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS**

**3.1 [Proposal Requirements]{.underline}**

A proposal to ED under the SBIR program should represents a sound
approach to the investigation of an important education, technological,
engineering or scientific question, and that it is worthy of support
under the stated criteria of this solicitation.

A proposal should be self-contained and written with the care and
thoroughness accorded to papers for publication. The offeror should
review the proposal carefully to ensure that information and data
essential for evaluation are included. The scientific and technical
merit of the proposed research is the primary concern for all research
supported by ED. *\[NOTE: The number of points weighted to this area are
contained in the "Evaluation Criteria" - Section 4.3, page 13.\]*

The proposal\'s research or R&D must be responsive to the ED program
objectives, but it can also serve as the base for technological
innovation, new commercial products, processes or services that may
benefit the public. **Proposals must be confined principally to advanced
concepts in educational technology, scientific or engineering research
or research and development.** The research may be carried out through
construction and evaluation of a laboratory prototype, where necessary.

> **Proposals primarily for the development of proven concepts toward
> commercialization or for market research should not be submitted
> because such efforts are considered the responsibility of the private
> sector. Commercialization is one objective of follow-on funding in
> Phase III.**

**3.2 [Protection of Information in Proposals]{.underline}**

It is ED policy to use information included in proposals for evaluation
purposes only, and to protect such information from unauthorized use or
disclosure. While this policy does not require that the proposal bear a
notice, protection can be assured only to the extent that the "Legend"
specified in section 5.12 *(page 19)* is applied to those data that
constitute trade secrets or to other commercial or financial information
that is confidential or privileged. Other information may be afforded
protection to the extent permitted by law, but ED assumes no liability
for use and disclosure of information to which the "Legend" has not been
appropriately applied.

**3.3 [Limitations on Length of Proposal]{.underline}**

This solicitation is designed to reduce the investment of time and money
to small firms in preparing a formal proposal. Those who wish to respond
should submit a SBIR Phase I proposal of **no more than 25 pages**,
single or double spaced, including the cover page, biographical
information, budget information, and all enclosures or attachments.

The page size should be the standard size (8 ½" x 11"; 21.6 cm x 27.9
cm) and should conform to the standard formatting instructions; in
particular, 2.5 cm margins and type no smaller than 10 point font size.
The type size restriction applies to figures and illustrations as well
as to the text. Photo reduction of larger pages is not permitted. Each
page with any writing will be counted as a page

In the interest of equity to all offerors, **all information must be in
the 25 pages.** No additional attachments of any kind will be allowed,
including computer discs.

> **Proposals that contain more than 25 pages will be**
>
> **rejected without considerations.**

The proposal should be direct, concise, and informative. Promotional and
other discussion not related to the project is discouraged. The proposal
must be primarily directed at research or R&D on the specific topic
chosen. It is not necessary to provide a lengthy description of the
commercial applications in the Phase I proposal except to mention them
briefly under section 3.4.3 (a)(iii) *(page 9).*

**3.4 [Phase I Proposal Format]{.underline}**

1.  **[Proposal Cover Sheet]{.underline}.** Every proposal is
    **required** to have a cover sheet. This page should be numbered "1"
    at the center of the bottom of the page. It should be the topmost
    page of the proposal; that is, [no additional cover page should be
    used]{.underline}. The cover sheet **must contain the following
    information**:

    a.  The words **"Department of Education"** and the **solicitation
        number** from the cover page of this solicitation.

    b.  The **topic number** and **name of topic** (e.g., Topic 2:
        Development or Adaptation of Devices, Mechanisms, or Techniques
        for Individuals with Hearing Disabilities).

    c.  A **project title**, which should [briefly describe]{.underline}
        the particular project proposed. *\[NOTE: Please limit the title
        to no more than 100 characters\]*

    d.  The **name and complete address of the firm**.

    e.  A **small business certification** as follows:

        \"The above concern certifies that it is a small business firm

        and meets the definition as stated in the solicitation.\"

    f.  A **socially and economically disadvantaged small business
        certification** as follows:

        "The above concern certifies that it (does/does not) qualify as
        a socially and economically disadvantaged small business as
        defined in the Definitions section of the program solicitation."

        *\[NOTE: This item is for statistical purposes only.\]*

    g.  A **woman-owned small business certification** as follows:

        "The above concern certifies that it (does/does not) qualify as
        a women‑owned small business as defined in the Definitions
        section of the program solicitation."

        *\[NOTE: This item is for statistical purposes only.\]*

    h.  An **employment and subcontracting limit statement** as follows:

        \"The above concern certifies that:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  The primary employment of the Principal Investigator (51% or more of
    time) will be with this small business concern at the time of the
    award and during the period of the award; and,

2.  A minimum of two-thirds of the research and/or analytical effort
    will be performed by the proposing firm.\"

    a.  An **information statement regarding duplicate research** as
        follows:

        \"This firm and/or Principal Investigator (has/has not)
        submitted proposals for essentially equivalent work under other
        Federal program solicitations or (has/has not) received other
        Federal awards for essentially equivalent work."

    b.  A **disclosure permission statement** as follows:

        "Will you permit the Government to disclose the title and
        technical abstract page of your proposed project, plus the name,
        address, and telephone number of the corporate official of your
        firm, if your proposal does not result in an award, to concerns
        that may be interested in contacting you for further information
        or possible investment?

        Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_."

    c.  The signature of a **company official** of the proposing firm
        and that individual's **typed** name, title, telephone number,
        and date of signature.

    d.  The signature of the **principal investigator** and that
        individual's **typed** name, title, telephone number and date of
        signature.

    e.  **Legend for proprietary information** as described in the
        "Considerations" section of this program *solicitation (Section
        5.12, pages 18-19),* if appropriate.

    f.  The **total amount of funds requested**. This figure should
        agree with the total line of offeror\'s budget; the figure
        cannot exceed \$50,000.

    g.  The **proposed Phase I duration** (not to exceed six months).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
2.  **[Abstract or Summary]{.underline}.** The second page of the
    proposal, numbered "2" at the center of the bottom, should be a
    one‑page summary of the proposed research or R&D that includes the
    following information:

    a.  The **name, address and telephone number** of the firm.

    b.  The name and title of the **principal investigator**.

    c.  The same information as in Section 3.4, items 1(a), 1(b), and
        1(c).

    d.  A **technical abstract** of no more than 200 words. *\[NOTE:
        Please be clear and concise. If awarded, this information will
        be widely disseminated to communicate your activity.\]*

    e.  A summary of the **anticipated results** and **implications of
        the approach** (for both Phases I and II) and the **potential
        commercial applications** of the research. [Nothing in the
        abstract should be proprietary or confidential.]{.underline}

3.  **[Technical Content]{.underline}.** Beginning on page 3 of the
    proposal, include the following:

    a.  **Importance:**

        i.  [Identification and Significance of the Problem or
            Opportunity.]{.underline} Make a clear statement of the
            specific research problem or opportunity addressed and why
            it is important.

        ii. [Related Research or R&D.]{.underline} Describe significant
            research or R&D that is directly related to the proposal,
            including any conducted by the principal investigator or by
            the offeror's firm. Describe how it relates to the proposed
            effort, and describe any planned coordination with outside
            sources. The purpose of this section is to persuade
            reviewers of the offeror's awareness of key recent
            developments in the specific topic area.

        iii. [Potential Commercial Applications.]{.underline} Briefly
             describe whether and by what means the proposed research
             also appears to have potential commercial application. Also
             describe briefly whether and by what means the proposed
             project appears to have potential use by the Federal
             Government (if, in fact, it does).

    b.  **Feasibility:**

        i.  [Phase I Technical Objectives.]{.underline} State the
            specific objectives of the Phase I research or R&D effort,
            including the technical questions it will try to answer to
            determine the feasibility of the proposed approach.

        ii. [Relationship with Future R&D.]{.underline} Discuss the
            significance of the Phase I effort in providing a foundation
            for the Phase II R&D effort. Also state the anticipated
            results of the proposed approach if Phases I and II of the
            project are successful.

    c.  **Scientific and Technical Quality:**

        [Phase I Work Plan.]{.underline} Include a detailed description
        of the Phase I R&D plan. The plan should indicate not only what
        will be done, but how the R&D will be carried out. Phase I R&D
        should address the objectives and the questions cited in 3
        (b)(i) above. The methods planned to achieve each objective or
        task should be discussed in detail. **THIS SECTION SHOULD BE AT
        LEAST ONE-THIRD OF THE PROPOSAL.**

    d.  **Staff Qualifications:**

        i.  [Key Personnel and Bibliography of Directly Related
            Work.]{.underline} Identify key personnel involved in Phase
            I, including their education and directly related
            experience, or writings. Where vitae are extensive,
            summaries that focus on the most relevant experience or
            publications are desired. Such summaries may be necessary to
            meet the proposal size limitation. Also list all other
            commitments that senior personnel have during the proposed
            period of performance.

        ii. [Consultants.]{.underline} Involvement of consultants in the
            planning and research stages of the project is permitted. If
            such involvement is intended, it should be described in
            detail. *\[NOTE: See section 5.10 (page 17) for limitations
            on subcon­tracting.\]*

    e.  **Facilities and Equipment:**

        [Facilities.]{.underline} The conduct of advanced research may
        require the use of sophisticated instrumentation or computer
        facilities. The offeror should provide a detailed description of
        the availability and location of the facilities and equipment
        necessary to carry out Phase I.

    f.  **Budget:**

        [Proposed Budget.]{.underline} Prepare and submit a budget with
        the following categories, including a line-item cost breakdown
        for each category:

        1\. Labor

        2\. Equipment

        3\. Other Expenses

        4\. Consultants

        5\. Subcontracts

        6\. Subtotal

        7\. Profit

        8\. Total

        **Please note that the entire budget must be included in the 25
        page limit.**

4.  **[Related Proposal(s) or Award(s)]{.underline}.** A firm may have
    received other SBIR awards or elected to submit essentially
    equivalent proposal(s) under other SBIR program solicitations. **In
    these cases, a statement must be included** in this proposal
    indicating:

    a.  The name and address of agencies to which proposal(s) was/were
        submitted or from which SBIR award(s) was/were received.

    b.  The date(s) of proposal submission and date(s) of award.

    c.  The title, number and date of SBIR program solicitation under
        which proposal(s) was/were submitted or award(s) received.

    d.  The applicable research topic in the program solicitation for
        each SBIR proposal submitted or award received.

    e.  The titles of research projects.

    f.  The name and title of the principal investigator for each
        proposal submitted or award received.

        **[WARNING]{.underline}**

        **While it is permissible, with proposal notification, to submit
        identical or essentially equivalent proposals for consideration
        under numerous Federal program solicitations, it is unlawful to
        enter into funding agreements requiring essentially equivalent
        effort. If there is any question concerning this it must be
        disclosed to the soliciting agency or agencies before award.**

5.  **[Documentation of Multiple Phase II Awards.]{.underline}** A small
    business concern that submits a Phase I application and has received
    more than fifteen (15) Phase II SBIR awards, as totaled from all
    Federal agencies with SBIR programs, during the preceding five (5)
    fiscal years, **must** document the extent to which it was able to
    secure Phase III funding to develop concepts resulting from previous
    Phase II awards.

> Accordingly, such small business concerns shall submit, for each Phase
> II award, the name of the awarding agency, the date of the award, the
> funding agreement number, the funding amount, the topic or subtopic
> title, the amount of the follow-on funding commitment, the source and
> the date of the commitment, and the current commercialization status.
> *\[NOTE: This required information **[will not be]{.underline}**
> counted toward the application limitation of 25 pages.\]*

**4.0 METHOD OF SELECTION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA**

**4.1 [Introduction]{.underline}**

Phase I proposals will be judged on a competitive basis in a two‑stage
process.

1.  All proposals will be **screened** initially to ensure that they
    meet the stated proposal requirements set forth in section 4.2
    *(pages 12-13)* of this solicitation.

2.  Proposals meeting those requirements will then be **evaluated** by
    persons who are experts in the topic areas using the criteria listed
    in section 4.3 *(page 13*). Reviewers will include people outside
    the Federal Government.

> **Awards will be made by the Department of Education based upon these
> evaluation criteria and the availability of funds.** In the evaluation
> and handling of proposals, every effort will be made to protect the
> confidentiality of the proposal and any evaluations. After final award
> decisions are made the offeror will be sent the technical evaluations.
> The identity of the reviewer(s) will not be disclosed.

**4.2 [Screening Criteria]{.underline}**

> **To avoid any misunderstanding, offerors should be aware that
> proposals not satisfying all the screening criteria will be returned
> to the proposing organization without review.** Those proposals may
> not be resubmitted with or without revision under this solicitation.
> All copies of the proposals that were not used in the screening
> process will be returned with the letter of notification. The
> screening criteria are:

1.  **The proposing firm must qualify and certify that it does qualify
    as a small business concern for research or R&D purposes at the time
    of the award** *(Section 1.3 "Eligibility", page 2; and Section 2.2
    "Small Business Concern", page 4).* It must be a for‑profit
    institution and employ no more than 500 employees. If it is a
    subsidiary of another firm, this limit applies to the total number
    employees, including all affiliates.

2.  The Phase I proposal **may not exceed 25 pages** including the cover
    sheet, abstract and required budget. Use only one side of page. Each
    page with any writing will be counted as a page. No attachments of
    additional information are allowed in the interest of equitable
    treatment for all offerors. Supplementary materials, revisions, and
    substitutions will not be accepted after the due date for proposals.
    *(Section 3.3, pages 6-7)*

3.  The Phase I **proposal must be limited to one topic**; however, a
    firm may submit separate proposals on differ­ent topics, or different
    proposals on the same topic, but each proposal must respond to
    exactly one topic. Duplicate proposals will be returned without
    review. *(Section 1.3 "Limitations", page 3)*

4.  Phase I budgets **must not exceed \$50,000**, including
    subcontracts, indirect costs, and fee, but excluding any proposed
    cost‑sharing.

    *(Section 3.4.1(n), page 8)*

5.  The project duration of Phase I **must not exceed six months**.

    *(Section 3.4.1(o), page 8)*

6.  **The principal investigator's primary employment must be with the
    small business concern at the time of award and during the period of
    the award**. That is, more than one‑half of the principal
    investigator's working time must be spent with the small business
    firm during the period of performance.

    *(Section 1.3 "Eligibility", page 2)*

7.  **A minimum of two‑thirds of the research and/or analytical effort
    under each SBIR Phase I project must be carried out by the proposing
    firm**. Furthermore, consultant fees and contracts to third parties
    for portions of the scientific/technical effort may not exceed
    one-third of the total budget, including direct and indirect costs.
    *(Section 5.10, page 17)*

8.  **Phase I proposals must be for research or R&D activities only**. A
    firm must not propose technical assistance, demonstration projects,
    market research, classified research, or patent applications or
    litigation. *(Section 3.1, page 6)*

4.3 **[Evaluation Criteria for Phase I]{.underline}**

ED will select for award those proposals offering the best value to the
Government according to the criteria set forth below:

1.  The **scientific and technical quality** of the Phase I research
    proposal and its relevance to the particular topic addressed, with
    special emphasis on innovation and originality. The adequacy of the
    work plan will be considered under this criteria. **(40 points)**

2.  **Qualifications of the principal investigator, other senior or key
    personnel, and consultants** (if any). **(20 points)**

3.  **Adequacy of the Phase I proposed effort** to demonstrate whether
    or not the concept proposed is **feasible**. **(15 points)**

4.  **Importance** of the problem or opportunity and **anticipated**
    **benefits of the proposed research,** if successful. Offeror's
    awareness of related R&D, and the potential commercial applications
    of the research will be considered under this criteria. **(15
    points)**

5.  **Adequacy of facilities and equipment** to conduct the proposed
    research or R&D. **( 5 points)**

6.  **Adequacy and appropriateness of the budget**. A narrative
    justification for the proposed budget should be included in the
    proposal. **( 5 points)**

> Technical reviewers will base their conclusions only on information
> contained in the proposal. It cannot be assumed that reviewers are
> acquainted with the firm or key individuals or any experiments
> referred to, but not described, in professional journals. Relevant
> journal articles should be identi­fied in the proposal.

4.4 **[Evaluation Criteria for Phase II]{.underline}**

**A Phase II proposal can only be submitted to the Federal participating
agency that awarded Phase I.** ED will send detailed instructions
regarding Phase II proposal submission to the eligible winners of its
Phase I awards. Evaluation of proposals for Phase II will consider their
technical and scientific merit; feasibility; the results of Phase I
work; the eventual benefit of the product, process, or technology; the
validity of the project plans for achieving stated goals; the
qualifications of the personnel; the availability of required equipment
and facilities; and the commercial potential of the proposal. Phase II
proposal evaluations may include on‑site evaluations of the Phase I
effort.

The reasonableness of the proposed costs vis-à-vis the effort to be
performed will be examined to determine those proposals that offer the
best value to the Government. The commercial potential of the proposal
will be determined by one or more of the following:

a)  the small business concern\'s record of commercializing SBIR or
    other research;

b)  the existence of Phase II funding commitments from private sector or
    non-SBIR Federal funding sources;

c)  the existence of Phase III follow-on funding commitments for the
    subject of the research; and,

d)  the presence of other indicators of commercial potential of the
    idea.

The follow-on funding commitment must provide that a specific amount of
Phase III funds will be made available to or by the small business. The
source of Phase III funds and the dates such funds will be made
available should be indicated. The terms cannot be contingent upon the
obtaining of a patent, due to the length of time this process requires.
The commitment shall be submitted with the Phase II proposal.

**5.0 CONSIDERATIONS**

5.1 **[Awards]{.underline}**

> The Department of Education is required under P.L. 102-564 to
> participate in the Small Business Innovation Research program. The
> Government's obligation under this award is contingent upon the
> availability of appropriated funds from which payments are made. No
> legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may
> arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for
> this award and until the Contractor receives notice of such
> availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.
>
> **There is no commitment by ED to make any awards on any topic, to
> make a specific number of awards, or to be responsible for any monies
> expended by the offeror before an award.**

The Department of Education expects to make approximately thirty (30)
firm fixed‑price Phase I awards to small businesses ranging up to
\$50,000 in fiscal year 1999. Awards are expected to be made by
mid-July, 1999. ED will announce the names of those firms receiving
awards, and successful offerors will then normally have six (6) months
after award to carry out the proposed Phase I effort.

For planning purposes only, ED anticipates that approximately one‑third
of the Phase I awardees will receive Phase II awards, depending on the
results of the Phase I efforts and the availability of funds. Phase II
is to further develop ideas explored during Phase I. Specific
instructions for the preparation of Phase II proposals will be sent to
qualifying Phase I awardees near the completion of the Phase I work.

5.2 **[Reports]{.underline}**

A monthly interim progress report is required. One copy shall be
submitted to the Contracting Officer\'s Technical Representative (COTR).

**One (1) original and one (1) copy** of a final Phase I project report
**must** be submitted to ED's COTR upon completion of the Phase I work.

> The final report shall include a one‑page project summary as the first
> page, using the format specified in section 3.4.2 (page 8-9) of this
> solicitation. The summary should identify the purpose of the research,
> and include a brief description of the research carried out, the
> research findings or results, and the potential applications of the
> research. **This project summary is to be submitted without
> restriction on publication and may be published by ED.** The balance
> of the report should indicate in detail the project objectives, work
> carried out, results obtained, and estimates of technical feasibility.

All reports must carry an acknowledgment statement on the cover page
such as:

> "This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of
> Education under purchase order number \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_. Any
> opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this
> publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
> the views or policies of the Department of Education."

5.3 **[Payment Schedule]{.underline}**

Payments will be made in accordance with the payment schedule negotiated
and agreed to by the Contracting Officer. The offeror shall include his
or her cash flow requirements as part of the budget for Phase I.

> Once invoices are received, the due date for paying invoice is the
> 30th day after the designated billing office receives a proper invoice
> from the contractor (i.e., one that has been approved by the COTR) or
> the 30th day after ED accepts goods or supplies performed by the
> contractor, whichever is later (FAR 52.232-25).

5.4 **[Rights in Technical Data]{.underline}**

Rights in technical data, including software, developed under the terms
of any funding agreement resulting from proposals submitted in response
to this solicitation shall remain with the contractor, except that the
Government shall have the limited right to use such proprietary data for
Government purposes and shall not release such data outside the
Government without permission of the contractor for a period of four (4)
years from completion of the project from which the data were generated.
However, effective at the conclusion of the four‑year period, the
Government shall retain a royalty‑free license for Government use of any
technical data delivered under an SBIR contract whether patented or not
and shall be relieved of all disclosure prohibitions.

5.5 **[Copyrights]{.underline}**

With prior written permission of the Contracting Officer, the awardee
normally may copyright and publish material developed with ED support.
ED receives a royalty‑free license for the Federal Government and
requires that each publication contain an appropriate acknowledgment and
disclaimer statement as in section 5.2 *(above).*

5.6 **[Patents]{.underline}**

Small business firms normally may retain the principal worldwide patent
rights to any invention developed with Government support. The
Government receives a royalty‑free license for Federal Government use,
reserves the right to require the patentholder to license others in
certain circumstances, and requires that anyone exclusively licensed to
sell the invention in the United States must normally manufacture it
domestically.

To the extent authorized by 35 U.S.C. 205, the Government will not make
public any information disclosing a Government‑supported invention for a
four‑year period to allow the awardee a reasonable time to pursue a
patent.

5.7 **[Cost‑Sharing]{.underline}**

Cost sharing is permitted for proposals under this solicitation;
however, cost sharing is not required, and it will not be an evaluation
factor in considering any proposal.

5.8 **[Profit or Fee]{.underline}**

Both Phase I and Phase II contracts may include a profit or fee.

5.9 **[Joint Ventures or Limited Partnerships]{.underline}**

Joint ventures and limited partnerships are permitted provided that the
entity created qualifies as a small business in accordance with the
Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 631, and with the definition in section
2.2 (page 4) of this solicitation.

5.10 **[Subcontracting Limits]{.underline}**

For **Phase I**, at least **two‑thirds** of the research and/or analytic
effort must be performed by the proposing firm. Furthermore, a total of
all consultant fees, facility leases or usage fees, and other
subcontracts or purchase agreements may not exceed one‑third of the
total funding agreement price.

For **Phase II**, **at least one-half** of the research and/or analytic
effort must be performed by the proposing firm, that is, the total of
all consultant fees, facility leases, or usage fees, and other
subcontracts or purchase agreements may not exceed one-half of the total
contract price.

5.11 **[Contractor Requirements]{.underline}**

Upon award, the contractor will be required to make certain legal
commitments through acceptance of numerous provisions in the Phase I
procurement.

> The outline that follows is illustrative of the types of provisions
> that will be included in the funding agreement. This is not a complete
> list, nor does it contain the specific wording of these clauses. ED
> will make Phase I awards as described in CFR Title 48-Federal
> Acquisition Regulations. The resultant agreement will contain legally
> binding clauses. Copies of complete general provisions will be made
> available prior to award.

1.  **[Standards of Work.]{.underline}** Work performed under the
    funding agreement must conform to high professional standards.

2.  **[Inspection.]{.underline}** Work performed under the funding
    agreement is subject to Government inspection and evaluation at all
    reasonable times.

3.  **[Examination of Records.]{.underline}** The Comptroller General
    (or a duly authorized representative) shall have the right to
    examine any directly pertinent records of the contractor involving
    transactions related to this contract.

4.  **[Default.]{.underline}** The Government may terminate the
    agreement if the contractor fails to perform the work contracted.

5.  **[Termination for Convenience.]{.underline}** The agreement may be
    terminated at any time by the Government if it deems termination to
    be in its best interest, in which case the contractor will be
    compensated for work performed and for reasonable termination costs.

6.  **[Disputes.]{.underline}** Any dispute concerning the funding
    agreement that cannot be resolved by agreement shall be decided by
    the Contracting Officer with right of appeal.

7.  **[Contract Work Hours.]{.underline}** The contractor may not
    require an employee to work more than eight (8) hours a day or
    forty (40) hours a week unless the employee is compensated
    accordingly (that is, receives overtime pay).

8.  **[Equal Opportunity.]{.underline}** The contractor will not
    discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment
    because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or
    because he or she is a disabled veteran or a veteran of the Vietnam
    era; or because he or she is physically or mentally handicapped.

9.  **[Officials Not to Benefit.]{.underline}** No Government official
    shall benefit personally from the agreement.

10. **[Covenant Against Contingent Fees.]{.underline}** No person or
    agency has been employed to solicit or secure the agreement upon an
    understanding for compensation except bonafide employees or
    commercial agencies maintained by the contractor for the purpose of
    securing business.

11. **[Gratuities.]{.underline}** The agreement may be terminated by the
    Government if any gratuities have been offered to any representative
    of the Government to secure the agreement.

12. **[Patent Infringement.]{.underline}** The contractor shall report
    each notice or claim of patent infringement based on the performance
    of the agreement.

13. **[American Made Equipment and Products.]{.underline}** When
    purchasing equipment or a product under the SBIR funding agreement,
    purchase only American-made items whenever possible.

5.12 **[Proprietary Information]{.underline}**

Information contained in unsuccessful proposals will remain the property
of the offeror. The Government may, however, retain copies of all
proposals. Public release of information in any proposal submitted will
be subject to existing statutory and regulatory requirements.

> Successful applicants shall provide a redacted version of their
> proposal to the Contracting Officer within ten (10) days of receipt of
> award. It should be suitable for release by the Government in response
> to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

If proprietary information is provided by a offeror in a proposal which
constitutes a trade secret, proprietary commercial or financial
information, confidential personal information or data affecting the
national security, it will be treated in confidence, to the extent
permitted by law, provided this information is clearly marked by the
offeror with the term **\"confidential proprietary information"** and
provided the following **legend** appears on the title page of the
proposal:

> "For any purpose other than to evaluate the proposal, this data shall
> not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated,
> used, or disclosed in whole or in part, provided that if a funding
> agreement is awarded to this offeror as a result of or in connection
> with the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right
> to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the
> funding agreement. This restriction does not limit the Government's
> right to use information contained in the data if it is obtained from
> another source without restriction. The data subject to this
> restriction is contained in pages \_\_\_\_\_\_ of this proposal."

Any other legend may be unacceptable to the Government and may
constitute grounds for return of the proposal without further
consideration and without assuming any liability for inadvertent
disclosure. The Government will limit dissemination of such information
to/within official channels.

5.13 **[Additional Information]{.underline}**

1.  This solicitation is intended for informational purposes and
    reflects current planning. If there is an inconsistency between the
    information contained herein and the terms of any resulting SBIR
    funding agreement, then the terms of the funding agreement are
    controlling.

2.  In the interests of those with special needs, the offeror is
    encouraged to develop outcomes which include alternate formats
    (e.g., closed- or open-captioning for films and/or videotapes,
    Braille, large print, audiotape).

3.  The SBIR program is not a substitute for existing unsolicited
    proposal mechanisms. The Government shall not accept unsolicited
    proposals under the SBIR program in either Phase I or Phase II.

4.  If an award is made pursuant to a proposal submitted under this
    solicitation, the contractor will be required to certify that he or
    she has not previously been, nor is currently being, paid for
    essentially equivalent work by any agency of the Federal Government.

**6.0 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS**

6.1 **[Address]{.underline}**

Address **one (1) original and five (5) copies** of the proposal to:

U.S. Department of Education

Contracts and Purchasing Operations

Room 3616, ROB #3

GSA Building

7th and D Streets, S.W.

Washington, DC 20202-4447

**ATTN:** **SBIR Topic \#** [\*\*\*]{.underline}

> ***\*\*\* Insert the Topic Number for the one that you are submitting
> your proposal.***

Secure packaging is mandatory. ED will not be responsible for processing
proposals damaged in transit. Do not send separate "information" copies
or several packages containing parts of a single proposal. All six (6)
copies of a proposal **must** be sent in the same package.

One copy must be signed as an original by the principal investigator and
an official empowered to commit the offeror. Other copies may be
photocopied. All copies must be clearly legible. Do not use bindings or
covers. Staple the pages firmly in the upper left hand corner of each
proposal.

**[Hand‑carried]{.underline}** proposals should be addressed as
indicated above and **delivered** to that address.

**[Telegraphed and/or Facsimile Proposals]{.underline}** are not
authorized; if submitted, such proposals shall be rejected.

6.2 **[Deadline for Proposals]{.underline}**

1.  Deadline for receipt of six (6) copies of a proposal at the
    Department of Education is **[2:00 P.M.]{.underline} Eastern
    Daylight Time, April 9, 1999**. Any proposal received at the office
    designated in this solicitation after the exact time specified for
    receipt will not be considered unless it is received before awards
    are made and:

    a.  It was sent by registered or certified mail not later than April
        5,1999; or

    b.  It was sent by mail or, (if authorized by the solicitation, was
        sent by telegram or via facsimile), and it is determined by the
        Government that the late receipt was due solely to mishandling
        by the Government after receipt at the address given in Section
        6.1; or

    c.  It was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day
        Service - Post Office to Addressee, not later than 5:00 p.m. at
        the place of mailing two (2) working days (April 7, 1999) prior
        to the date specified for receipt of proposals. The term
        "working days" excludes weekends and U.S. Federal Holidays; or

    d.  It was the only proposal received.

2.  The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a
    late proposal or modification sent either by U.S. Postal Service
    registered or certified mail is the U.S. or Canadian Postal Service
    postmark both on the envelope or wrapper and on the original receipt
    from the U.S. or Canadian Postal Service. Both postmarks must show a
    legible date or the proposal, quotation, or modification shall be
    processed as if mailed late. "Postmark" means a printed, stamped, or
    otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a postage meter machine
    impression) that is readily identifiable without further action as
    having been supplied and affixed by employees of the U.S. or
    Canadian Postal Service on the date of mailing. Therefore, offerors
    should request the postal clerks to place a legible hand
    cancellation bull's-eye postmark on both the receipt and the
    envelope or wrapper.

3.  The only acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the
    address given in Section 6.1 is the time/date stamp of the Contracts
    and Purchasing Operations on the proposal wrapper or other
    documentary evidence of receipt maintained by that Office.

4.  The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a
    late offer, modification, or withdrawal sent by Express Mail Next
    Day Service-Post Office to Addressee is the date entered by the post
    office receiving clerk on the "Express Mail Next Day Service-Post
    Office to Addressee" label and the postmark on both the envelope or
    wrapper and on the original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service.
    "Postmark" has the same meaning as defined in paragraph (2) of this
    provision, excluding postmarks of the Canadian Postal Service.
    Therefore, offerors should request the postal clerk to place a
    legible hand cancellation bull's-eye postmark on both the receipt
    and the envelope or wrapper.

5.  Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram (including
    mailgram) received at any time before award. If the solicitation
    authorizes facsimile proposals, proposals may be withdrawn via
    facsimile received at any time before award, subject to conditions
    specified in the provision entitled "Facsimile Proposals." Proposals
    may be withdrawn in person by an offeror or an authorized
    representative, if the representative's identity is made known and
    the representative signs a receipt for the proposal before award.

**7.0 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION SOURCES**

Certain sources can provide information that can be useful in preparing
SBIR proposals. The Internet sites listed below can provide you with
helpful material and links to other sites.

U.S. Department of Education (ED) (www.ed.gov/)

ED SBIR Program (www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/SBIR/)

Small Business Administration (SBA)

Office of Technology (SBIR) (www.sba.gov/sbir/)

National Institute of Standards

and Technology (NIST) (www.nist.gov/)

Educational Resources Information Center

(ERIC User Services) (www.accesseric.org:81)

Scientific and Technical Information

Network (STINET) (www.dtic.mil/stinet/)

**8.0 RESEARCH TOPICS**

For fiscal year 1999, the Department of Education has selected for its
SBIR solicitation eleven (11) technical topics which are designed to
better understand and improve academic achievement. SBIR projects are
encouraged that look to the future by exploring uses of technology to
ensure equal access to education and promote educational excellence
throughout the nation.

The technical topics for which proposals will be considered are
identified below. Each topic or series of topics has been preceded by
the Department's Program Office which identified the topic(s) for
inclusion in the SBIR solicitation. A contact person for technical
information related to a specific topic is provided on page 30 . Each
proposal must respond to one (and only one) topic as outlined in this
section.

Under most of the topics there are included a number of examples to
illustrate the kinds of activities that could be funded under the topic.
Each example includes a reference number (e.g., 1-A., 7-E.). In order to
facilitate the review of proposals, offerors who choose to submit
proposals that address one of these examples are asked to specify the
reference number associated with that particular example. Should an
offeror chose to submit a proposal which does not address one of the
examples, then the offeror need only reference the topic number (e.g.,
1, 2,\...). Please note that this is only to assist in the review of
applications; [it is not necessary that offerors address any particular
example, so long as a topic is addressed.]{.underline}

**PLEASE NOTE THAT EACH PROPOSAL MUST BE IDENTIFIED TO AT LEAST THE
MAJOR TOPIC LEVEL, WHICH IS UNDERLINED.**

**OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES**

These topics relate to innovative research utilizing new technologies
addressing the needs of individuals with disabilities and their
families. Whenever feasible, individuals with disabilities will be
represented on the review panels.

> **Topic 1: [Development of Strategies or Adaptation of Assistive
> Devices, Mechanisms, Technologies, or Techniques for Individuals with
> Disabilities.]{.underline}**

Examples include:

1-A. Input/output devices and technologies that promote better access to
information for individuals with disabilities such as devices that
convert text to sound or sound to text, for persons with sensory
impairments; expand accommodations for individuals with physical
disabilities.

1-B. Simulation and virtual reality technologies to help newly disabled
persons anticipate and address the challenges associated with their
disability.

1-C. Technologies to meet the specialized needs of individuals with
cognitive impairments or emotional disorders and provide
feedback/stimulation to enhance the development of infants, toddlers,
and young children with disabilities.

1-D. Devices and technologies that promote remote access to information
for individuals with disabilities, such as devices that can request and
receive computer real time captioning (CART) service by wireless means.

1-E. Devices and technologies that promote remote access to information
for individuals with disabilities, such as small, portable devices that
can help individuals with hearing and/or speech disorders communicate
remotely using speech-recognition or artificial voice output technology.

1-F. Strategies to assist children with disabilities participate in
after school activities such as camp craft, community awareness,
mobility awareness, and others, with an emphasis on inclusion.

1-G. Computer cursor movement/commands utilizing non-traditional control
mechanisms, such as neural output.

1-H. Full screen tactile displays for computer monitors.

> **Topic 2: [Development or Adaptation of Devices, Mechanisms, or
> Techniques for Individuals with Hearing Disabilities.]{.underline}**

Examples include:

2-A. Improved application of current technology, such as eye-gaze
equipment with simple operation protocols to identify vision at-risk
factors in hearing impaired children and youth.

2-B. Real-time speech-to-text technologies as practical communication
and English-enhancing systems for students who are hard of hearing in
regular education and in vocational training programs.

2-C. Curricula and accompanying materials to advance video conferencing
and distance-learning interactive training of interpreters who work with
persons of different ages who are hard of hearing.

2-D. Advancement of captioning technology and software to facilitate
more universal low-cost, low-technology captioning of media to
facilitate the inclusion of children and adults with hearing
disabilities in school, community, and workplace activities, and in
activities to improve interpersonal relationships.

2-E. Devices and technologies that promote remote access to information
for individuals with severe hearing loss, such as devices that deaf
people can use to request and receive face-to-face interpreter service
by wireless means.

2-F. Develop technological improvements in hearing aids or tinnitus
masking devices for individuals who would benefit from these devices.

2-G. Development of a speech-to-print-to-sign capacity using the normal
English language syntax.

> **Topic 3: [Innovative Technologies to Enhance Self-Determination, Job
> Development, Job Modification, Job Opportunities, or Transition from
> School-to-Work for Individuals with Disabilities.]{.underline}**

Examples include:

3-A. Computer-based multimedia techniques, including simulation, CD ROM
and virtual reality, for job training and school-to-work transition.

3-B. Technologies and techniques to assist teachers and related service
providers in identifying appropriate assistive and home automation
devices for individuals transitioning from school to adult life.

> **Topic 4: [Innovative Technological Circumventions to Neutralize
> Existing or Emerging Barriers to the Education or Vocational
> Rehabilitation of Individuals with Disabilities]{.underline}.**

Examples include:

4-A. A more efficient means of adapting screen-reading technology to new
and emerging graphic-based systems, such as Windows and the various
Navigating interfaces in the Internet and elsewhere.

4-B. Software to enable individuals with disabilities to have improved
access to the Internet and the World Wide Web.

> **Topic 5: [Combining New Technologies to Expand Placement
> Opportunities for Vocational Rehabilitation Clients, and
> School-To-Work Options for Youth with Disabilities]{.underline}.**

Examples include:

5-A. Combining new geographic satellite locators with a teleaddress
system, to assist learning disordered individuals doing delivery work.

5-B. Increase job mobility of individuals with low incident disabilities
by integrating wireless technology into visual or auditory aids
currently immobilized by hardwired requirements.

> **Topic 6: [Development of Adaptation of Telecommunications,
> Electronics Networks, Multimedia, or Management Information Systems
> and Software to Meet the Needs of Individuals with Disabilities, Their
> Families, and Professionals in Rehabilitation and Special
> Education.]{.underline}**

Examples include:

6-A. Interactive media and systems to assist local school districts,
vocational rehabilitation agencies, centers for independent living, or
community rehabilitation facilities in planning for the acquisition or
redirecting instructional technology and media; the use of complicated
hardware/software; and charting management changes and planning.

6-B. New applications of telecommunication systems for distance
learning, establishing social networks, and for providing new
information to parents and professionals by enhancing interactive
dialogue between individuals with disabilities, and their education/
social support systems and their peers.

6-C. Technologies to increase the participation of students with
disabilities in regular instructional settings.

6-D. Management information systems for tracking persons with
disabilities across multiple service providers to obtain useful, timely
and accurate career-planning/ preparation information.

6-E. Modification of off-the-shelf technology to better accommodate the
needs of individuals with communication disabilities, with special
emphasis on speech recognition and voice-to-print technologies.

6-F. Modification of new and emerging audio systems and connectors (e.g.
infrared) to provide broad frequency, high gain output to persons with
diminishing hearing.

6-G. Information presentations for regular education teachers in
inclusive/integrated settings about the benefits of closed captioned and
video described television programs, as tools for developing better
literacy skills in students who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind or
visually impaired, or who have limited English proficiency.

6-H. Development of databases to aid professionals in understanding the
unique needs of individuals with specific types of disabilities.

6-I. Virtual training/learning environments, particularly those
involving two-way interaction that may be appropriate for independent
living, home care, or tele-rehabilitation.

6-J. Improved intelligibility and/or speed \-- in voice input
(recognition) and/or voice output (speech) for augmentative
communication devices, using advanced techniques such as artificial
intelligence, frequency analysis, neural nets, or fuzzy logic.

> **Topic 7: [Development or Adaptation of Innovative Technologies to
> Enhance Learning and Development for Individuals with Disabilities of
> All Ages]{.underline}.**

Examples include:

7-A. Technologies that provide fairness, accuracy, reliability,
validity, and access to assessments for individuals with disabilities.

7-B. Technologies to improve the assessment of individuals with
disabilities in cognitive, language, perceptual-motor, vocational, or
social development domains.

7-C. Multimedia technologies to facilitate individualized multi-sensory
learning experiences for individuals with disabilities.

7-D. Networked instructional management systems (NIMS) to provide
integrated computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-managed
instruction (CMI) for students with disabilities.

7-E. Portable electronic learning devices to improve the performance of
individuals with learning and other cognitive disabilities in language
and memory skills.

> **Topic 8: [Development or Adaptation of Technologies to Foster the
> Inclusion and Facilitate the Successful Integration of Individuals
> with Disabilities into Regular School, Social, and Work
> Environments]{.underline}.**

Examples include:

8-A. Technologies and media that improve communication between
individuals with disabilities and their non-disabled peers and teachers.

8-B. Assistive devices or other technologies that foster communication
and language development, mobility, or learning and promote access to
mainstream environments for individuals with disabilities.

> **Topic 9: [Development or Adaptation of Devices or Technologies to
> Assist Children, Youth, and Adults with Disabilities in the Arts,
> Recreation, or Leisure-Time Activities]{.underline}.**

Examples include:

9-A. Computer, video, or other electronic graphic display systems
designed to present visual translations of audio inputs from music.

9-B. Swimming techniques and aids for individuals with physical
disabilities.

9-C. Devices and technologies that assist disabled children and adults
to participate in more stimulating leisure and recreational activities,
especially those activities involving non-disabled persons.

9-D. Strong but lightweight sports equipment for persons with special
needs.

9-E. Technologies and assistive devices to enhance direct participation
in the arts by individuals with disabilities.

**OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND ADULT EDUCATION**

> **Topic 10. [Development of Server-Based Authorware to Provide
> Instruction for Adults with Less Than a Secondary School Education
> Literacy Level.]{.underline}**

The use of the Internet to extend access for adult learners to literacy
instruction is motivated by the ability of this media to overcome the
barriers of time and place as an instructional delivery system.

Online instruction has the ability to reach adults in their homes,
workplace, local schools, libraries and/or community centers.
Instructional material can be easily updated as well as archived and
online materials usually have lower developmental and operating costs as
compared to satellite broadcasting.

\"Authorware\" is an interactive computer-based instructional technology
system that permits interaction on the web between the teacher and the
learner. Teachers will be able to develop and place curriculum materials
on the Internet through the use of server-based \"authorware.\" Learners
will be able to respond online to these instructional materials.

The reading level of the instructional materials should be at least an
eighth grade level.

The content of the material should be placed in a context of interest to
adults. Examples of possible life skills information are:

-   Literacy instruction that focuses on parenting skills;

-   Reading prescription medicine labels correctly;

-   Understanding health and medical terms;

-   Family nutritional information;

-   Registering to vote;

-   Applying for a job or acquiring and practicing employability skills.

No matter what the specific focus of the content, all instructional
materials should be designed to increase the reading and comprehension
skills of adults who currently read at less than an eighth grade level.

**OFFICE OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND IMPROVEMENT**

> **Topic 11. [Development or Adaptation of Innovative Technologies to
> Improve the Teaching and Learning of All Students, from Early
> Childhood through Postsecondary Education as Well as Aspects Related
> to School Governance, Finance, and Policy-making.]{.underline}**

Examples include:

11-A. Design and prototype development of a software or hardware system
for encouraging the academic engagement of at-risk students.

11-B. Design and development of software products to assist adults in
increasing their literacy and numeracy skills.

11-C. Design of software to build young children\'s readiness skills so
that they will be successful in kindergarten.

11-D. Design of technology-based systems to use student achievement data
to inform school improvement and accountability.

11-E. Design of software products to assist teachers to use computers
for effective classroom instruction in reading and mathematics to
elementary school students.

**9.0 POINTS OF CONTACT FOR TECHNICAL TOPICS**

**[Topic Numbers]{.underline}** **[Point of Contact]{.underline}**
**[Telephone Number]{.underline}**

1-9 Dr. Robert Jaeger (202) 205-8061

10 Dr. Mary Lovell (202) 205-9258

11 Dr. Luna Levinson (202) 208-3716

[^1]: ^ ^   ^?^ A note of caution that such arrangements may be
    permitted as long as they do not affect the small business size,
    status or eligibility of the prime contractor as provided for in
    section 2.2.