BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
November 9, 2006

Honorable John Winn

Commissioner of Education

Florida Department of Education

Turlington Building, Suite 1614

325 West Gaines Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0100

Dear John:

Thank you for submitting a proposal for the U.S. Department of
Education's (Department's) growth model pilot project. I appreciate the
work you and your staff have done to participate in this effort so far.
I am excited to explore, through this pilot, the promise that growth
models hold for measuring school accountability and getting us to
universal proficiency by 2014, giving schools credit for improvement
over time, and measuring individual student progress. I am pleased to
inform you that I am accepting Florida's growth model proposal to be
part of the Department's pilot project on the condition that Florida's
standards and assessment system receives full approval by the end of the
2006--07 school year.

As you know, the Department has not yet approved Florida's standards and
assessment system, approval of which is one of the core principles
underlying the growth model pilot. Specifically, the Department has
outstanding concerns with the technical quality and achievement
standards of Florida's alternate assessment (the Florida Alternate
Assessment Report or FAAR) and the lack of performance-level descriptors
that include descriptions of competencies associated with each
achievement level and content area for both the Florida Comprehensive
Assessment Test (FCAT) and the FAAR. I look forward to receiving the
additional evidence we need to give full approval to your standards and
assessment system in order to move ahead with Florida's participation in
the growth model pilot project.

If Florida receives full approval of its standards and assessment
system, the Department will enter into a flexibility agreement with
Florida under section 9401 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
(ESEA), as amended, to enable Florida to implement its growth model as
part of determining adequate yearly progress (AYP) under section
1111(b)(2) of the ESEA for the 2006-07 school year. After the first year
of implementation, we will discuss with you any modifications that may
need to be made to your growth model. As part of a flexibility
agreement, Florida must agree to the following:

Page 2

-   Florida must provide data comparing the results of determining AYP
    on the basis of its growth model with the results obtained when AYP
    is determined under the statutory model.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Florida must participate in an evaluation of its growth model
    conducted by the Department.

Again, I congratulate you on Florida's growth model proposal and look
forward to including it in the pilot provided Florida's standards and
assessment system has been approved.

> Sincerely,
>
> /s/
>
> Margaret Spellings

cc: Honorable Jeb Bush

Hanna Skandera
January 11, 2008 9:00 PM

**Bureau of Land Management**

Re; Western Oregon Plan Revision

Dear Sirs,

I am a 5th generation descendent of an Oregon pioneer family, living on
my family\'s 150 year old farm on the Umpqua River. I am also a
fundamentalist, ultra-conservative Republican with my own business. As a
local businessman in the construction industry, I feel very directly the
economic hardships with great pain.

I preface with that for emphasis when I say, it is time for us to take
responsibility for our economy, and renounce our addiction to exploiting
every last vestige of our nearly depleted ancient forests as the
habitual quick fix to our economic problems. It is time to stop all
further decimation of the legacy God has entrusted us with. The ancient
old growth forests are not a renewable resource, to be "harvested". They
are the last living witness of the primordial world as it was created by
our maker. We are down to the last small percentage of that trust, and
as proper stewards of what God has placed in our care, we need to let
the remainder live on as a witness to our children, of the forests that
once were. God did not preserver and place this trust in our care to be
utterly exploited to extinction for the financial gain of a single
generation.

I am not calling for a halt to the forest industry utterly. But we
should make it policy not to cut down any more trees over 4 feet in
diameter or 150 years old. If, as they claim, most of the logging is of
newer growth, such a policy should make little difference to the
economy. But even if it were, no economic short term fix can justify the
eradication of the last great trees. The few have already grown rich off
the resources of the many. If there is any democracy left in this land,
hear the voice of the people and leave the last of the big trees to
their children.

Philip B. Bean

Architect
# NY I81051

May 13, 2002

CLA-2-94:RR:NC:2:227 I81051

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 9405.40.6000

Mr. Samuel Pontieri

Alpha International, LP

40 Parker Road, Ste. 201

Elizabeth, NJ 07207

RE: The tariff classification of a dental lamp from Japan.

Dear Mr. Pontieri:

In your letter received in this office on April 18, 2002, on behalf of
Takara Belmont USA, Inc., you requested a tariff classification ruling.
Sample is being returned as requested.

The sample submitted is a dental halogen lamp, referred to as the
"X-CALIBUR - HLU," that is designed for mounting onto the dentist's
chair. This lamp features a two-piece adjustable white-painted aluminum
arm that measures approximately 43 inches long. One end of the arm is
inserted into the white-painted aluminum housing of the transformer with
a heavy-gauge unfinished light cord and fitted bottom socket for
accommodating the steel pole via its adapter. The other end of the arm
is affixed to an adjustable white-painted aluminum bar, measuring nearly
6 inches in length, with a U-shaped holder for the bulb's housing. This
housing, measuring about 10 ½ inches across its width and possessing a
white plastic slotted body with lateral handles, has a quartz halogen
bulb with a cylinder-like metal protector, as well as a concave-shaped
glass reflector, plastic frontal lens and top plastic on/off switch.

The applicable subheading for this dental lamp will be 9405.40.6000,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides
for other electric lamps and lighting fittings: of base metal: other
than of brass. The rate of duty will be 6 percent ad valorem.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the
Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact
National Import Specialist George Kalkines at 646-733-3028.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski

Director,

National Commodity

Specialist Division
Materials Science and Technology Division

**Materials Theory Seminar**

"Cycloidal Spin Orders in Multiferroic RMnO3"

**Nobuo Furukawa**

Aoyama Gakuin University

Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

11:00 a.m.

HTML/4515, Room 265

**Abstract:**

Multiferroic materials simultaneously have multiple ferroic orders. When
ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity coexist, they often exhibit giant
cross-correlation effects such as magnetism responding to external
electric fields and vise versa. In perovskite manganites RMnO3, where
R=Dy, Tb, (Eu,Y), \..., ferroelectricities are induced by cycloidal spin
orders (helical orders whose spin rotation axis is perpendicular to the
propagation vector).Moreover, a flop of electric polarization vector
from P//c to P//a is observed as magnetic field is applied to H//b. So
called 'electromagnon'absorption (magnon exitation driven by electric
field component of light) has been reported.

In order to understand these cross-correlation phenomena, we performed
several theoretical analyses. In my talk, I will present 1) Monte Carlo
simulation of Mn spins, to reproduce H-T phase diagram and to understand
polarization flop. 2) Calculation of one- and two-magnon excitation
spectra driven by electric component of light. Microscopic features of
Mn spins and their couplings to electric fields are discussed.

Host: Satoshi Okamoto
Jeff Hendrickson \<livingonthecreek@yahoo.com\>

05/22/2007 12:07 PM

To Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

Subject comments to proposed HOV lane regulation regarding hybrid cars

I have been trying for an hour to access Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005 0173

on your website, to comment on the proposed rule for allowing hybrid
cars

to use HOV lanes on highways, and the docket entry does not appear to

exist. I have used both the basic and advanced search at

www.regulations.gov and it does not work. This is supposed to be a
public

docket. There are also conflicting directions as to what email address
to

send comments to, some places saying send email to
pugliese.holly@epa.gov

and others saying send comments to this email. This is all very

frustrating and confusing.

My comment:

There should be an additional criteria for the use of hybrid cars with

only one passenger on HOV lanes: a minimum combined gas mileage of 40

miles per gallon. Gas guzzling SUVs, even hybrids, should not be allowed

simply because they achieve a 25% or 50% improvement over other similar

gas-guzzling SUVs. If you are going to reward hybrid owners for saving

gas, then only reward those cars that really make a difference. SUVs

primarily use the hybrid technology to increase horsepower, not to

increase gas mileage, and therefore, SUVs should have to achieve some

minimum threshold of gas mileage to even be considered. 40 mpg seems to

be a good starting point, since most of the passenger cars, except the

Honda Accord Hybrid, get over 40mpg. The Honda Accord Hybrid should not

be on the approved list either. I know, I just bought a new Honda

non-hybrid Accord and the Honda dealer itself talked me out of the
hybrid

because he said there was no significant savings in gas mileage.

In short, the new regulation should be:

1\. A vehicle that obtains a minimum combined city/highway fuel economy
of

40 miles per gallon and

2\. Either one of the following:

a\. A dedicated alternative fuel vehicle, or

b\. A hybrid vehicle achieving 50 percent or better in-city fuel economy

or 25 percent or better in combined city/highway fuel economy compared
to

a similar gasoline fueled vehicle.

Signed,

Jeff Hendrickson

13131 Old Fredericktown Rd.

East Liverpool, Ohio 43920

330-385-4590
MAZIE K. HIRONO

2^ND^ DISTRICT, HAWAI\`I

\-\-\-\--

MEMBER OF CONGRESS

**Congress of the United States**

**House of Representatives**

**Washington, DC 20515**

**Statement of Congresswoman Mazie K. Hirono of Hawaii**

**in the U.S. House of Representatives**

**In Support of H.R. 1538**

**Wounded Warrior Assistance Act of 2007**

**March 28, 2007**

Ms. HIRONO. Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of H.R. 1538, the
Wounded Warrior Assistance Act, which will help correct the
unconscionable deficiencies exposed by the Washington Post at the Walter
Reed Army Medical Center. H.R. 1538 will improve the delivery of medical
services to our wounded warriors who have done all that we have asked of
them. We now must honor our commitment to them to care for them when
they are injured.

   H.R. 1538 provides the basic services we would have expected for our
wounded service personnel such as readily available case managers and
advocates to assist incapacitated patients receive appropriate care,
improved training of health care professionals and better monitoring of
out-patients to ease the transition to the VA medical care system. The
Walter Reed experience showed that we cannot rely on the current system
to provide these basic services and care.

   I am particularly pleased with the attention we will finally pay to
the mental injuries, such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, that can be
as crippling and incapacitating to our soldiers and veterans as physical
injuries.

   When I spoke on House Concurrent Resolution 63 opposing the
President\'s surge, I mentioned CPT Lisa Blackman, a clinical
psychologist, who cared for soldiers who suffered devastating emotional
and mental harm inflicted while serving in Iraq and chronicled their
troubling and heart-breaking torment in the book, Operation Homecoming.

   These brave troops, who suffered severe physical as well as mental
injuries, shamefully did not receive proper treatment after faithfully
serving their country. H.R. 1538 properly recognizes the sacrifices our
troops have made and provides the long overdue care and medical services
our troops should properly expect and deserve from their government.
![](media/image1.wmf) Dan Markley

**Date:** 10/5/1999**\
Rev Date:** **\
Project:** D0 Silicon Detector**\
Doc. No:** **\
Subject:** PLC Readout of Silicon Internal RTD's\
\
This document describes preliminary details concerning the PLC Control
System monitoring of internal Silicon Detector RTD sensors. The RTD
sensors are 1000 Pt, Minco Part #S247PF12. The signal electronic crates
located on the CC Calorimeter will read these RTD's. These crates will
provide a digital temperature value to the D0 DAQ system as well as an
analog calibrated output to the PLC control system.

The objective is to have an established control system monitoring the
Silicon temperatures 24 Hrs a day until the Silicon is no longer needed,
expected to be some number of years. The cryogenic Control system also
has a remote Auto Dialing Alarm System, which will be employed for the
Silicon temperature monitoring.

# RTD Output Signal

The Output Signal is a voltage linear to temp using the following curve
fit formula:

T = V-.8491 Volts Temp

.04088 .0315 -20C

.8491 0C

2.0755 30C

Span = 2.044V/50C = .040889V/C

**[505-2555 Specifications]{.underline}**

Input Channels 16 differential input channels (140 VRMS
channel-to-channel common mode rejection CMR)

Signal Range Unipolar: 0 to 5 VDC, 0 to 10 VDC, or 0 to 20 mA

Update Time 5.9 ms, no filtering

8.2 ms, digital filtering enabled

Digital Filtering Time Constant 25 ms

Repeatability 0.008%

Resolution Unipolar: 14 bit plus sign 0--5 VDC range = 0.3125 mV/step

Common Mode Rejection \>86db @ 60Hz (digital filtering disabled)

Normal Mode Rejection \>45db @ 60Hz (digital filtering enabled)

Input Protection Input ESD Protection: 4,000 V

Overrange Protection: 500 V

Isolation 1500 VDC channel-to-PLC

Module Size Single wide

# Accuracy and Resolution

Resolution

Module .3125mV/Step = .076C / Step

4.0889mV/C

Accuracy

Class B Sensor .3C

Module 1.2C .0005C if rescaled as Note1

Lead (2-Wire) ?

Current Source ?

Op-Amp Circuit ?

1.5C Min

**Note1:** I recommend rescaling the analog output to 0-5VDC to
represent --20C to 30C for better sensitivity and accuracy.

# Cost

505-2555 Module (128Channels) 8 x \$1600 = \$12800

Remote Base Controller 1 x \$924 = \$924

505 Base 1 x \$624 = \$624

505 Power Supply 1 x \$604 = \$604

Total \$14,952

# Other Options

We discussed reading the needed RTD's, with the two systems paralleling
access to each RTD. It's likely that one system would electronically
interfere with the other. While it might be possible to make the Cryo
system a passive reading system, this would require the signal
electronics to be powered anyway, to supply the stimulation current.
This would defeat the main purpose of reading in parallel.
## **Big Bang Model Quick Notes**

## I. Protons and Neutrons Down to 1 Billion K and an Age of 100 seconds

# If you are a proton to start...have a positron (ping-pong ball in pocket)

1.  Move outward from the center of the group in a zigzag path.

2.  If you touch before 1 Billion K, do not join.

3.  If you touch after 1 Billion K, you can join or not join.

4.  If you join with another proton, hold hands (or link arms) and:

> One emits a positron and holds up neutron sign.
>
> Other holds up proton and Deuterium (1 P + 1 N) sign.

5.  But if you instead join with a neutron, hold hands (or link arms)

> And keep the P and N signs---hold up a Deuterium sign

6.  Break apart if you wish as you bend or are bumped.

7.  Rejoin as above when you wish.

> *If you are a neutron to start...you do not have a positron.*

1.  Move outward from the center of the group in a zigzag path.

2.  If you touch before 1 Billion K, do not join.

3.  If you touch a proton after 1 Billion K, you can join or not join.

4.  If you join with a proton, hold up your neutron sign,

> One of you holds up the Deuterium (1 P and 1 N) sign.

5.  Break apart if you wish as you bend or are bumped.

6.  Rejoin as above when you wish.

*If you are in a deuterium*

1\. If you meet another neutron, you may hold hands and hold

> up a Tritium (Hydrogen 3 with 1 P and 2 N) sign. You may also move
> away or break apart soon after you form.

II\. Deuterium, Protons, and Neutrons at Less than 1 Billion K and Older
than 100 seconds

1.  Continue to move outward.

2.  If you are part of a Deuterium (1 P and 1 N) and you meet a proton,
    you may move apart or stick. If you stick, hold hands. Hide the
    Deuterium sign and hold up the Helium 3 sign.

3.  If you are part of a Deuterium (1 P and 1 N) and you touch another
    Deuterium (1 P and 1 N) you can move away or join.

> If you join, hold hands, hide the Deuterium signs and hold up
>
> A Helium 4 sign.

4.  If you are a Helium 3 and you meet a neutron and decide to join,

> Hide the Helium 3 and hold up a Helium 4 sign. (over)
>
> *(Also possible:*
>
> *-Helium 3 (2 P and 1 N) and Deuterium (1 P and 1 N) forms*
>
> *Helium 4 (2 P and 2 N) and a proton (one person leaves group).*
>
> *-Helium 3 (2 P and 1 N) + Deuterium (1 P and 1 N) forms*
>
> *Helium 4 (2 P and 2 N) and a neutron and a positron.)*

We're almost done...

5.  Hopefully there is a Helium 3 (2 P and 1 N) and a Helium 4

(2 P and 2 N). When everyone freezes (no moving, no talking)

we will try to find one each of these. These will hold hands to make

Beryllium 7 (4 P and 3 N). The group holds up the Beryllium 7 sign.

This nucleus is unstable; so one P emits a positron and holds an N sign.

The group holds up the Lithium 7 sign.

Teacher calls "End."
Exhibit 2-1

LOWER INCOME BENEFIT

1\. Compute Maximum Total Subsidy:

0 Bedroom = \$5,000

1 Bedroom = \$6,500

2 Bedroom = \$7,500

3+ Bedroom = \$8,500

2\. Compute Maximum Subsidy for Low Income Benefit (Units

actually occupied by low-income tenants\--income = 1 or 2).

3\. Compute maximum low income subsidy as percent of maximum

total subsidy.

4\. Apply percent (step 3) to total RRP project funds disbursed

per Fiscal Year in project (accumulate to each FY Grant).

5\. Compute percent grant funds for low income per FY (total

funds accumulated in step 4, divided by total dollars

disbursed for completed project per FY grant.

EXAMPLE:

4 Unit Project (1-1BR, 2-2BR, 1-3BR)

3 Units occupied by low income tenants

\$27,000 RRP funds disbursed (\$10,000 FY\'84, \$17,000 FY\'85)

STEP 1: MAXIMUM TOTAL SUBSIDY: 1 1BR X \$6,500 =\$ 6,500

2 2BR X \$7,500 = 15,000

1 3BR X \$8,500 = 8,500

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\$30,000

STEP 2: MAXIMUM SUBSIDY LOW/INCOME: 2 2BR X \$7,500 =\$15,000

1 1BR X \$6,500 = 6,500

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\$21,500

STEP 3: PERCENT LOW/INCOME SUBSIDY = \$21,500/\$30,000 = .72

STEP 4: .72 x \$10,000 (FY\'84 FUNDS) = \$7,200 (ACCUMULATE TO \'84

GRANT)

.72 X \$17,000 (FY\'85 FUNDS) = \$12,240 (ACCUMULATE TO \'85

GRANT)

STEP 5: ABOVE CALCULATIONS ARE PERFORMED FOR EACH COMPLETED

PROJECT. GRANT FUNDS ACCUMULATED IN STEP 4 ARE REPORTED

IN QUARTERLY REPORT FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR FUNDS DISBURSED

FOR COMPLETED PROJECTS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Exhibit 2-2

LARGE FAMILY REQUIREMENT

1\. Compute maximum total subsidy as follows:

0 Bedroom = \$5,000

1 Bedroom = \$6,500

2 Bedroom = \$7,500

3+ Bedroom = \$8,500

2\. Compute maximum subsidy 2+ bedroom.

3\. Compute percent 2+ bedroom subsidy based on maximum subsidy

for 2+ bedroom.

4\. Apply percent (step 3) to RRP funds disbursed to calculate

RRP funds for 2+ bedroom (accumulate to grant for each FY

funds in project).

5\. Compute percent of RRP funds for 2+ bedroom based on

accumulated funds in step 4.

NOTE: PERCENT = ACCUMULATED RRP FUNDS (STEP 4)/TOTAL FY FUNDS

DISBURSED FOR COMPLETED PROJECTS.

6\. Perform above calculations for 3+ bedroom units.

EXAMPLE

4 UNIT PROJECT (1-1 BEDROOM, 2-2 BEDROOM, 1-3 BEDROOM)

\$27,000 RRP FUNDS DISBURSED (\$10,000 FY\'88, \$17,000 FY\'89)

STEP 1: MAXIMUM TOTAL SUBSIDY: 1 BEDROOM X \$ 6,500

2 BEDROOM X \$ 7,500

2 BEDROOM X \$ 7,500

3 BEDROOM X \$ 8,500

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\$30,000

STEP 2: MAXIMUM SUBSIDY 2+ BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM X \$ 7,500

2 BEDROOM X \$ 7,500

3 BEDROOM X \$ 8,500

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\$23,500

STEP 3: PERCENT \$23,500/\$30,000 .78

STEP 4: .78 X \$10,000 = \$ 7,800 (ACCUMULATE TO FY 88 GRANT)

.78 X \$17,000 = \$13,260 (ACCUMULATE TO FY 89 GRANT)

STEP 5: PERCENT RRP FUNDS FOR 2+ (OR 3+) BEDROOMS:

TOTAL ACCUMULATED RRP FUNDS (STEP 4)/TOTAL RRP FUNDS

DISBURSED FOR COMPLETED PROJECTS FOR EACH FY GRANT
**Construction of Pavement Subsurface Drainage Systems - Workshops**

**July 26, 2001**

**BACKGROUND**

In the early 1990\'s, **Demonstration Project No. 87, Drainable
Pavement Systems,**

(Demo 87) was presented in over 40 States. This project discussed the
need to provide pavement subsurface drainage systems to eliminate
moisture distresses in concrete pavement. Good design, construction, and
maintenance guidance was also provided.

Recent reports and field investigations have shown that current
construction procedures are inadequate. If subsurface drainage is
provided, construction must be good enough to allow the drainage
principals to work.

FHWAs video inspection project inspected highway edgedrains with a
closed circuit television camera. The purpose of the project was to give
the SHA a qualitative picture of the States edgedrains and to
demonstrate the video inspection equipment. Inspection progress was
viewed on a color monitor and the entire operation was video tapped.

Many of the edgedrain pipes, particularly the outlet pipes, were either
crushed on blocked with debris. It was obvious that many of the problems
occurred during the construction phase. Video inspection vividly
identified any problems in the edgedrain.

**WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION**

This workshop was developed to overcome these problems. The central
thrust of the presentation is the construction of the following key
drainage elements: permeable bases, separator layers, and edgedrain
systems. Current, proper design guidance and construction procedures for
permeable bases and separator layer for both asphalt concrete and
Portland cement concrete pavements will be presented.

Emphasis will be placed on the construction of pipe edgedrain systems.
The overall goal of the presentation is to provide edgedrain systems
that will come though the construction phase intact and functional.

Guide specification have been developed for the construction of
permeable bases, separator layers, and the video inspection of edgedrain
systems. These guidelines provide current specification and construction
procedures.

In the past FHWA has stressed that if a SHAs is not willing to provide
maintenance of the edgedrain system, permeable base drainage systems
should not be built. Emphasis is again placed on the need for
maintenance of edgedrain systems. Design and construction must produce
an edgedrain system that is capable of being maintained.

The role of video inspection is highlighted. The best use of video
inspection is to determine the quality of newly completed edgedrains.
This will provide quality assurance for new construction.

Contact: Bob Baumgardner, FHWA-Headquarters, Washington D.C., Phone
202-366-4612
> **FISCAL YEAR 2003**
>
> **Operating Cost Standards**
>
> **Sections 202 and 811**
>
> **[OFFICE]{.underline}** [**2003 OPERATING COST
> STANDARDS**]{.underline}

##### BOSTON HUB 

> Boston \$ 5,740
>
> Hartford 5,408
>
> Manchester 4,365
>
> Bangor 4,492
>
> Burlington 4,379
>
> Providence 5,348

##### NEW YORK HUB

> New York City 6,498

##### BUFFALO HUB

> Buffalo 4,574
>
> Albany 4,684

##### PHILADELPHIA HUB

> Charleston 4,297
>
> Newark 5,625
>
> Camden 5,100
>
> Pittsburgh 4,162
>
> Philadelphia 5,127
>
> Wilmington 4,741
>
> **BALTIMORE HUB**
>
> Baltimore 4,463
>
> Richmond 3,991
>
> Washington 4,545

##### GREENSBORO HUB

> Columbia 3,549
>
> Greensboro 3,852

##### ATLANTA HUB

> Atlanta 3,630
>
> San Juan 3,549
>
> Louisville 3,852
>
> Knoxville 3,548
>
> Nashville 3,410
>
> Memphis 3,630
>
> **FISCAL YEAR 2003**
>
> **Operating Cost Standards**
>
> **Sections 202 and 811**

# **OFFICE** **2003 OPERATING COST STANDARDS** 

### JACKSONVILLE HUB

Jacksonville 3,518

Miami 3,765

Tampa 3,326

Birmingham 3,549

Jackson 3,657

### CHICAGO HUB

Chicago 4,322

Indianapolis 4,101

### COLUMBUS HUB

Cincinnati 4,129

Cleveland 4,601

Columbus 4,076

### DETROIT HUB

Detroit 4,598

Grand Rapids 3,826

### MINNEAPOLIS HUB

Milwaukee 4,184

Minneapolis 4,463

### FT. WORTH HUB

Ft. Worth 3,852

Albuquerque 3,767

Lubbock 3,714

Houston 3,826

Little Rock 3,299

New Orleans 3,438

Shreveport 3,548

San Antonio 3,534

> **FISCAL YEAR 2003**
>
> **Operating Cost Standards**

#### Sections 202 and 811

**[OFFICE]{.underline}** **[2003 OPERATING COST STANDARDS]{.underline}**

### KANSAS CITY HUB

Des Moines 3,743

Kansas City 4,184

Topeka 3,686

Omaha 3,767

Oklahoma City 3,548

Tulsa 3,657

St. Louis 4,409

### DENVER HUB

Denver 4,076

Casper 3,462

Fargo 3,462

Helena 3,767

Salt Lake City 3,574

Sioux Falls 3,438

### SAN FRANCISCO HUB

Honolulu (Guam) 5,348

Reno 4,322

Phoenix 3,767

Sacramento 4,796

San Francisco 5,348

### LOS ANGELES HUB

Los Angeles 4,992

San Diego 4,627

Santa Ana 4,992

### SEATTLE HUB

Anchorage 7,631

Portland 3,991

Boise 3,881

Seattle 4,242

Spokane 4,156

## **NATIONAL AVERAGE FOR 2002 -- 181.1**

### [CITIES]{.underline} [ANNUAL AVERAGE]{.underline} [PERCENTAGE]{.underline}

2002. **[INCREASE]{.underline}**

Chicago-Gary-Kenosha

IL-IN-WI 189.3 8.2

Los Angeles-Riverside-

Orange County, CA 190.3 9.2

NY-Northern NJ-Long

Island, NY-NJ-CT-PA 200.8 19.7

Phil-Wilmington-Atlantic

City, PA-NJ-DE-MD 186.6 5.5

San Francisco-Oakland-

San Jose, CA 220.7 39.6

Bremerton, WA 199.8 18.7

Seattle-Tacoma, WA
# Incident Records Kit

**Supply Ordering Guide**

Use this guide to assemble pre-incident Documentation Unit supplies or
to acquire the needed supplies on an incident. It is based on typical
setup needs for an IMT.

-   **Retention Guidance**, laminated (NIFC website)

-   **IMT Instructions**, doubled sided/laminated (NIFC website)

-   **IMT File Directory** (diagrams), single sided/laminated (NIFC
    website)

1 Set - Plans

1 Set -- For distribution to functional Sections/Units

-   **IMT File Labels**, 1/5 cut or 1/3 cut size (NIFC website)

**1/5 cut** - Avery \# 5167/# 8167 mailing labels ½" x 1 ¾", 80/page in
4 columns

**1/3 cut** - Avery \# 8366 filing labels 11/16" x 3 7/16", 30/page in 2
columns

Other store brands of compatible labels may be used but may not align as
well.

2 Sets -- Plans (1 set for labeling hanging files, 1 set for labeling
inner manila file folders)

2 Sets -- Distribute additional sets to functional Sections/Units for
labeling their files

IMT order estimate for 1/5 cut labels = 5 sheets labels/set

IMT order estimate for 1/3 cut labels = 10 sheets labels/set

-   **Manila File Folders**, 100/bx (IMT order estimate = 3 boxes (300
    folders)

> **1/5 cut --** GSA \# 7530-00-281-5941
>
> **1/3 cut --** GSA \# 7530-00-282-2507
>
> **Straight cut --** GSA \# 7530-00-291-0098

-   **Standard Hanging File Folders**, 25/bx (IMT order estimate = 12
    boxes (300 hanging files)

> Green - GSA# 7530-01-364-9498
>
> Blue - GSA# 7530-01-364-9499
>
> Red - GSA# 7530-01-364-9500
>
> Yellow - GSA# 7530-01-364-9501
>
> \*[Note:]{.underline}

-   Standard hanging file folders come with 2" plastic tabs to
    accommodate 1/5 cut labels

-   If using larger, 1/3 cut labels order 3 ½" plastic tabs for hanging
    files.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **1/3 Cut Hanging File Folder Tabs**, 3 ½" (needed only when using
    larger labels)

> GSA \# 7510-00-053-9662, 25/pkg

-   **Plastic Bins --** (estimate initially 6-12)

> Bins should have hinged, interlocking lid, stackable and capable of
> accommodating standard hanging files. Built in molded rails are
> preferable to metal rails. Quantity needed dependant upon incident.
> Recycle when possible.

-   [Potential Source:]{.underline} Akro-Mils #66486FILB, 21.5" x 15" x
    12.5". Available at such sources as Office Depot, Staples, etc or
    directly from manufacturer with Govt. discount.
    <http://www.akro-mils.com/home_office/coupon_display.asp?id=150>
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 29, 2007

Contact: Aaron Latham

\(202\) 225-2576

**The More Things Change...**

*Democrats Pass Largest Tax Increase in American History...Again*

WASHINGTON -- Congressman Patrick McHenry today issued the following
statement upon the House Democrats passing the largest tax increase in
American history -- \$392.5 billion -- as part of the largest federal
budget in history, which checks in at \$2.9 trillion. The 1993-1994
House Democrats held the previous record for raising taxes; they passed
a \$240 billion tax increase -- which, interestingly, preceded the 1994
Republican Revolution. The Congressman's statement is below:

"The biggest difference between Republicans and Democrats is spelled out
every time taxpayers check their bank statements," said Congressman
McHenry. "The Democrats talk about providing 'a new direction' while
imposing the same, tired tax-and-spend fiscal philosophy they've pushed
for 70 years. They voted to pickpocket taxpayers for bigger government,
more spending, and less accountability. The Democrats are making the
American people pay for what they got last November."

Republicans proposed an alternative budget, which balances the budget by
2012 without raising taxes. Additionally, it saves \$279 billion by
instituting reforms to entitlement programs, takes Social Security off
the budget, increases veterans' health care funds by \$42.4 billion, and
matches President Bush's original funding request for our men and women
in the military. The Democrats voted down this proposal by a measure of
268 to 160.

The Democrats' federal budget will impact millions of American
taxpayers; the details of which are below:

-   115 million taxpayers will see their taxes increase, on average, by
    \$1,795

-   83 million women will see their taxes rise, on average, by \$2,068

-   48 million married couples will incur average tax increases of
    \$2,899

-   Taxes will increase, on average, by \$2,181 for 42 million families
    with children

-   12 million single women with children will see their taxes increase,
    on average, by \$1,082

-   17 million elderly individuals will incur average tax increases of
    \$2,270

-   Taxes will rise, on average, by \$3,960 for 26 million small
    business owners

-   Over 5 million taxpayers who previously owed no taxes will become
    subject to the individual income tax

\###
**CORN PRODUCERS GET A PRICE BOOST FROM HUSKER AG LLC USDA ASSISTED
VALUE ADDED ACTIVITY**

**[Outline of Need:]{.underline}**

Husker Ag LLC of Plainview, Nebraska, is a majority controlled producer
based venture with over 500 members, approximately 70 percent of which
are agricultural producers. As a fuel grade ethanol production plant,
Husker Ag LLC processes 8.5 million bushels of corn annually into more
than 20 million gallons of fuel grade ethyl alcohol (ethanol). A
secondary product produced is distillers grain (referred to as
co-product). Co-products are the corn components that remain after the
starch is converted to ethanol.

The traditional operating procedures of ethanol plants are to
mechanically dry the by-product (co-product) from 70 percent down to 10
percent via a drying process that consumes large amounts of natural gas.
Husker Ag will market their co-product as a "modified" product
containing about 55 percent moisture thereby reducing the amount of
natural gas consumed\--netting a substantial annual decrease in energy
costs and thereby reducing air emissions.

**[How Rural Development Helped:]{.underline}**

Husker Ag LLC received a \$226,850 value-added agricultural product
market development grant (VADG) from USDA Rural Development matched by
Husker Ag LLC to be used for working capital to further the development
of value-added processes for area corn.

"The USDA Rural Development grant will allow us to employ a Co-Products
Merchandiser, and supplement the salaries of the Plant Maintenance
Manager and Plant Lab Manager to proceed with our distillers grain
production that will benefit area feedlots and member producers.
Additionally the monies will help to purchase corn inventory for
production purposes," stated Allen Sievertsen, general manager for
Husker Ag LLC.

**[The Results:]{.underline}**

The ethanol plant has increased the local demand for corn, resulting in
a higher local corn price. Farmers used to be paid only a wholesale
commodity price for their corn that in turn was shipped out of the
immediate area. Currently Husker Ag LLC pays on average, \$.05-\$.10 per
bushel over the prevailing corn market price. Since the plant is located
closer to the producers' operations than other traditional markets,
local farmers haul their own corn versus having it trucked, saving on
trucking costs and increasing their income.

"Feedlots will benefit from the co-product produced as it is an
excellent source of protein and energy for livestock," stated
Sievertsen. "The plant will have the capacity to produce co-product to
feed 80,000 head of livestock."

Employment has increased from 30 to 32 employees thanks to the
development of the new co-product. The production is presently in excess
of 25 million gallons per year output which exceeds the facility's
estimated projections. Co-product revenues have contributed over \$6
million at year to date.

(November 2004)
FY 06 BALLOON FLIGHTS LAUNCHED

**OCTOBER 1, 2005 THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 2006**

# NASA FLIGHTS

**FLT** **SIZE RESULTS**

**[NO.]{.underline} [EXP./ORG.]{.underline} [DISCIPLINE]{.underline}
[MCM MCF]{.underline} [DATE]{.underline} [SITE]{.underline} [B
M]{.underline}**

551N MUSSER/INDIANA U UC 1.1 40L 0/07/05 FTS S S

552N SEO/UMD UC 1.1 40L 12/15/05 ANT S S

553N WEFEL-GUZIK/LSU UC 1.1 40L 12/19/05 ANT F F

554N CLEM/U DELAWARE US 1.1 40L 06/02/06 SW S S

555N GREGORY/WFF WT .17 6 06/12/06 SW TEST FLIGHT

556N MULLER/U CHICAGO UC 1.1 40L 07/08/06 SW S S

1592P KOGUT/GSFC GA .8 29 07/12/06 PSN S S

557NT ROTTER/CSBF WT .8 29 08/26/06 FTS S S

558N GUZIK/LSU UP .3 11L 09/04/06 FTS S S

560N RAMSEY/ MSFC NH 1.1 40L 09/25/06 FTS F F

561NT ROTTER/CSBF WT .8 29 09/30/06 FTS S S

**[REIMBURSABLE FLIGHTS]{.underline}**

**FLT** **SIZE RESULTS**

**[NO.]{.underline} [EXP./ORG.]{.underline} [DISCIPLINE]{.underline}
[MCM MCF]{.underline} [DATE]{.underline} [SITE]{.underline} [B
M]{.underline}**

550N ATLAS/U MIAMI UU .11 4L 10/01/05 FTS S S

559N MLYNCZAK/LaRC NU .3 11 09/18/06 FTS S S
# Prediction of PEMs & SMT Component Performance in Field Applications\* {#prediction-of-pems-smt-component-performance-in-field-applications .Doc-Title}

James N. Sweet

Dept. 1745, MS-0874

Sandia National Laboratories

P.O. Box 5800

Albuquerque NM 87185-0874

<Sweetjn@sandia.gov>

Phone: (505) 845-8242, Fax: (505) 844-7011

In this presentation we shall discuss progress at Sandia in development
of techniques and associated tools for predicting component lifetime in
the fabrication-storage-deployment-use lifecycle. The two areas which
will be discussed are the use of plastic encapsulated microelectronics
(PEMs) in a time varying hot-humid (temperature-humidity) environment
and the use of surface mount technology (SMT) in a temperature cycling
environment. In both cases, a wear-out type of degradation occurs with
an associated failure distribution function. It is necessary to insure,
as much as possible, that "early" wear-outs will not occur during the
useful life of the system.

For PEMs temperature and humidity aging we have developed a formalism
which uses estimated life cycle temperature-humidity data together with
estimates of accelerated lifetime and acceleration factor parameters to
predict a time to failure distribution function. The method has been
implemented in a "spreadsheet" calculation assisted with a Monte Carlo
"add-in" for calculation of the distribution function. Examples of the
technique will be presented.

In the case of thermo-mechanical solder joint fatigue (TMF) in SMT, we
have evaluated both commercial and in-house tools for prediction of the
time to failure distribution function, given a thermal cycle definition
plus information about component and solder joint properties. Examples
of our work will be presented and our current strategy discusses.

\* Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a
Lockheed Martin Company, for the U. S. Department of Energy under
contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.
WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION

FILED BY BELLSOUTH

**Report No. NCD-1131 June 22, 2005**

Re: NETWORK CHANGE CERTIFICATION RECEIVED

BellSouth, an incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC), has filed
certification that public notice of network change has been provided
through its publicly accessible Internet site, as required by section
51.329(a) of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
*See* 47 C.F.R. § 51.329(a). Specific network change information can be
obtained on the Internet at:

[**http://www.interconnection.bellsouth.com/notifications/network/index.html**](http://www.interconnection.bellsouth.com/notifications/network/index.html)

The incumbent LEC\'s certification refers to the changes shown below.

  ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
  **Number**              **Type of Change**      **Location of Change**

  20050083 Revision       Replacing Copper        Birmingham, AL
  20040162                Facilities with Fiber   
                          Optic Cable and Digital 
                          Loop Carrier Systems    

  20050084 Revision       Replacing Copper        Birmingham, AL
  20040164                Facilities with Fiber   
                          Optic Cable and Digital 
                          Loop Carrier Systems    

  20050085 Revision       Replacing Copper        Birmingham, AL
  20040165                Facilities with Fiber   
                          Optic Cable and Digital 
                          Loop Carrier Systems    

  20050086 Revision       Replacing Copper        Birmingham, AL
  20040161                Facilities with Fiber   
                          Optic Cable and Digital 
                          Loop Carrier Systems    
  ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------

The network change identified herein shall not be implemented within six
months of the date it was filed with the Commission. *See* 47 C.F.R. §
51.331.

Incumbent LEC contact:

Steven D. Long

Federal Regulatory Affairs

BellSouth

1133-21^st^ Street, N.W., Suite 900

Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 463-4107

The original filing is available for inspection and copying at the FCC
Public Reference Room, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Suite CY‑A257,
Washington, DC 20554.

For further information, contact Carmell Weathers, (202) 418-2325
(voice), or
[**carmell.weathers@fcc.gov**](mailto:carmell.weathers@fcc.gov) (email),
of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. The TTY
number is (202) 418-0484.

**-FCC-**
![](media/image1.png)

1.  Does the applicant have 501(c)(3) status?

Yes No

2\. How many full-time equivalent employees does the applicant have?
*(Check only one box).*

> 3 or Fewer 15-50
>
> 4-5 51-100
>
> 6-14 over 100

3\. What is the size of the applicant's annual budget? *(Check only one
box.)*

Less Than \$150,000

\$150,000 - \$299,999

\$300,000 - \$499,999

\$500,000 - \$999,999

\$1,000,000 - \$4,999,999

\$5,000,000 or more

4\. Is the applicant a faith-based/religious organization?

Yes No

5\. Is the applicant a non-religious community-based organization?

Yes No

6\. Is the applicant an intermediary that will manage the grant on
behalf of other organizations?

> Yes No

7.  Has the applicant ever received a government grant or contract
    (Federal, State, or local )?

Yes No

8\. Is the applicant a local affiliate of a national organization?

Yes No

# 

#   {#section-1 .unnumbered}

#  Survey Instructions on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants

# 

1\. 501(c)(3) status is a legal designation provided on application to
the Internal Revenue Service by eligible organizations. Some grant
programs may require nonprofit applicants to have 501(c)(3) status.
Other grant programs do not.

2\. For example, two part-time employees who each work half-time equal
one full-time equivalent employee. If the applicant is a local affiliate
of a national organization, the responses to survey questions 2 and 3
should reflect the staff and budget size of the local affiliate.

3\. Annual budget means the amount of money your organization spends
each year on all of its activities.

4\. Self-identify.

5\. An organization is considered a community-based organization if its
headquarters/service location shares the same zip code as the clients
you serve.

6\. An "intermediary" is an organization that enables a group of small
organizations to receive and manage government funds by administering
the grant on their behalf.

7.  Self-explanatory.

8.  Self-explanatory

**Paperwork Burden Statement**

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of information unless such
collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control
number for this information collection is **[1225-0083]{.underline}**.
The time required to complete this information collection is estimated
to average five (5) minutes per response, including the time to review
instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed,
and complete and review the information collection. **If you have any
comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions
for improving this form, please write to:** Departmental Clearance
Officer, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room
N-1301, Washington, D.C. 20210. **If you have comments or concerns
regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write
directly to:** Joyce I. Mays, Application Control Center, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210.
\-\-\-\-- Original Message \-\-\-\--

From: EM

To: emops-scd-users@scd.statehi.us

Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 11:07 PM

Subject: TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN-E DISCUSSION NUMBER 1

WTPZ42 KNHC 190859

TCDEP2

TROPICAL DEPRESSION SEVEN-E DISCUSSION NUMBER 1

NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL

2 AM PDT THU AUG 19 2004

INFRARED AND SSMI/TRMM MICROWAVE SATELLITE IMAGERY INDICATE THE

TROPICAL DISTURBANCE LOCATED ABOUT 1395 NMI EAST-SOUTHEAST OF HILO

HAWAII HAS BECOME BETTER ORGANIZED AND HAS DEVELOPED INTO TROPICAL

DEPRESSION SEVEN-E. THE INITIAL INTENSITY OF 30 KT IS BASED ON A

CONSENSUS DVORAK INTENSITY ESTIMATE OF T1.5\...OR 25 KT\...FROM TAFB

AND SAB AT 19/06Z\...AND IMPROVED BANDING FEATURES SINCE THEN. A

BAND OF DEEP CONVECTION NOW WRAPS ABOUT HALF WAY AROUND THE CENTER

\...WHICH EQUATES TO A DATA T-NUMBER OF T2.5\...OR 35 KT. UPPER-LEVEL

OUTFLOW IS GOOD IN ALL QUADRANTS AND CONTINUES TO IMPROVE.

THE INITIAL MOTION ESTIMATE IS 280/13. THE DEPRESSION HAS BEEN

MOVING AT A STEADY PACE ALONG THE SOUTHERN PERIPHERY OF THE EAST

PACIFIC SUBTROPICAL HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM\...AND A GENERAL WEST TO

WEST-NORTHWESTWARD MOTION IS EXPECTED THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD. A

SLIGHT STAIR-STEP IN THE FORECAST TRACK IS INDICATED IN 48 TO 72

HOURS DUE TO A LARGE HIGH-AMPLITUDE MID- TO UPPER-LEVEL TROUGH

LOCATED OVER THE CENTRAL PACIFIC NORTH OF HAWAII THAT IS FORECAST

TO CONTINUE DIGGING SOUTHWARD. THIS WILL AMPLIFY THE RIDGE TO THE

EAST AND NORTHEAST OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS AND CAUSE IT TO LIFT

SLOWLY NORTHWARD. AFTER 72 HOURS\...THE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE IS

FORECAST TO BUILD BACK SOUTH AND WESTWARD TO THE NORTH OF THE

CYCLONE AND THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. OF COURSE\...JUST HOW FAR NORTH

THE RIDGE MOVES WILL DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THIS SYSTEM WILL

AFFECT THE BIG ISLAND OF HAWAII IN ABOUT 5 DAYS. THE OFFICIAL TRACK

IS A BLEND OF THE GFS\...UKMET\...AND MEDIUM BAM MODELS.

THE INTENSITY FORECAST CALLS FOR SLOW BUT STEADY STRENGTHENING FOR

THE FIRST 72 HOURS AND CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE SHIPS MODEL. HOWEVER\...

SINCE THE CIRCULATION APPEARS TO BE RATHER TIGHT IN MICROWAVE

DATA\....AND GIVEN THAT THE CYCLONE WILL BE IN A LOW SHEAR

ENVIRONMENT OF LESS THAN 10 KT AND OVER 27-28 SSTS\...FASTER

STRENGTHENING THAN INDICATED IS HIGHLY POSSIBLE AND THE CYCLONE

COULD REACH HURRICANE STRENGTH IN ABOUT 48 HOURS OR SO.

FORECASTER STEWART

FORECAST POSITIONS AND MAX WINDS

INITIAL 19/0900Z 11.7N 132.4W 30 KT

12HR VT 19/1800Z 12.3N 134.9W 35 KT

24HR VT 20/0600Z 13.3N 137.7W 40 KT

36HR VT 20/1800Z 14.4N 139.9W 45 KT

48HR VT 21/0600Z 15.2N 142.1W 50 KT

72HR VT 22/0600Z 16.0N 146.5W 55 KT

96HR VT 23/0600Z 16.5N 150.0W 55 KT

120HR VT 24/0600Z 17.0N 154.0W 55 KT
![](media/image1.png){width="7.25in" height="0.8381944444444445in"}

1.  Dəvətnaməni, tədbir haqqında məlumatı və çıxışı **vaxtında** təqdim
    edin:

  ------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
  **SƏNƏD**                       **Məsul Texniki Mütəxəssisə ÇATDIRIN**

  Dəvətnamə (e-poçt vasitəsilə)   Tədbirdən 10 iş günü əvvəl

  Tədbir haqqında məlumat/ Çıxış  Tədbirdən 7 iş günü əvvəl

  Press reliz                     Tədbirdən 7 iş günü əvvəl
  ------------------------------- ---------------------------------------

2.  **Çıxışın məqsədyönlü olduğunu yəqin edin.** Səfir və ya Ölkə üzrə
    Koordinator müəyyən məntiqi məqsədə nail olmaq üçün tədbirinizdə
    iştirak etməyə dəvət olunmuşdurlar. Əmin olmaq lazımdır ki, onlar
    çıxış zamanı buna aidiyyatı olan dəyərli bir söz deyəcəklər.

> Bu haqda belə düşünmək lazımdır:

a.  Bu kütləvi tədbirin məqsədi nədir?

b.  ABŞ hökumətinin rəsmi nümayəndəsi bu məqsədə nail olmaq üçün nə kimi
    kömək göstərə bilər?

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
3.  Tədbir haqqında məlumatın "ümumi məlumat" bölməsini hazırlayarkən
    **özünüzü ABŞ hökumətinin nümayəndəsinin yerinə qoyun**. Çox güman
    ki, onun hər USAID layihəsinin spesifik məlumatına diqqət yetirmək
    üçün kifayət qədər vaxtı yoxdur. Odur ki, "ümumi məlumat" bölməsi
    rəsmi nümayəndənin malik olmadığı həmin müfəssəl məlumat boşluğunu
    "doldurmalıdır".

> Bu haqda belə düşünmək olar: əgər tədbirdən qabaq tədbir haqqında heç
> bir məlumatınız olmasaydı, hansı faktları bilməlisiniz ki, a) çıxış
> edən zamanı özünüzü sərbəst hiss edəsiniz və b) mətbuata məntiqi fikir
> söyləyəsiniz. Həmin məlumatın "ümumi məlumat" bölməsində öz əksini
> tapmalıdır.
>
> Unutmayın ki, **geniş məlumat** **daha yaxşıdır, nəinki az məlumat**.
> Lazım gələrsə, Məsul Texniki Mütəxəssis və İctimaiyyətlə Əlaqələr üzrə
> Mütəxəssis bu bölməni redaktə edəcək.