BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
**STATEMENT OF**

**COMMISSIONER JONATHAN S. ADELSTEIN**

*Re: Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Petition for
Rulemaking to Enhance Security and Authentication Standards for Access
to Consumer Proprietary Network Information, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (Jan. 10, 2006).*

I am very pleased that we open this rulemaking to address an issue of
momentous personal importance to American consumers: the troublesome
proliferation of telephone call records being made available on the
Internet without customers' knowledge or consent. Last summer, a
watchful public interest group, the Electronic Privacy Information
Center (EPIC), alerted the FCC to this trend and filed a petition asking
us to tighten our rules for protecting consumer call records. We take an
important step here by granting EPIC's petition and issuing this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking to find ways to tighten our rules and provide
greater security for these sensitive consumer records.

Telephone call records can include some of the most private personal
information about an individual. Finding out who people are calling and
for how long can be like picking someone's brain about their friends,
plans or business dealings. Unauthorized access to call records is a
highly invasive intrusion into both the personal and professional lives
of consumers. Disclosure of these records is far more than a mere
annoyance; indeed, it can lead to tragic consequences.

Congress recognized the sensitivity of this information in the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 when it prohibited phone companies from
using or disclosing customer proprietary network information without the
customer's approval. It charged the Commission with enforcing this
privacy protection and the Commission has previously adopted a set of
rules designed to ensure that telephone companies have effective
safeguards in place.

Telephone companies are required to have firewalls in place to protect
consumers' private information but instead these records are blazing all
over the Internet, available on numerous web sites even as we issue this
Notice. I appreciate the recent efforts of several phone companies to
take legal action against data brokers. This is an important step to
shutting these data brokers down. Still, the Commission must also take
immediate steps to ensure that we have sufficiently strong consumer
privacy rules in place and that phone companies are employing effective
safeguards to shield this data from harm. So, our efforts here to
strengthen our rules are critical and time sensitive. We ask the right
questions in this Notice, and I'm glad that we once again seek comment
on how to protect consumer privacy as communications migrate to
broadband and IP platforms. Our challenge now will be to move quickly to
shut the tap on this information drain.

I also support our efforts to bring swift enforcement action against
companies that are violating our rules. Even as we look to improve our
rules and as Congress considers additional safeguards, we must use our
existing authority to quickly address abuses of this private
information.
Maurice Arcangeli

Safety Activities Manager

Direct Dial: (856) 488-3115

Fax: (856) 488-8669

E-mail: <marcangeli@subaru.com>

September, 25 2008

Ref. No. GR08-039

Administrator (NOA-010)

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

1200 New Jersey Avenue

Washington, DC 20590

**[Re: 2009 Enhanced Vehicle Compatibility Report-Subaru Docket No.
14623]{.underline}**

Dear Administrator:

On behalf of Subaru of America, Inc. and its parent company. Fuji Heavy
Industries, Ltd, and pursuant to a December 2003 commitment from the
automobile industry, Fuji Heavy Industries USA, inc. reports the
following information regarding its 2009 model year vehicles:

(1) **Front-to-Front (Light Trucks)- Percentage of Compliance: 100%**

Meets Primary Structure Height Guide Req\'t.

[Model]{.underline} [Guidelines]{.underline} [Method]{.underline}
[VIN]{.underline} [Top(in.)]{.underline} [Bottom(in.)]{.underline} (a)
(b) (c)

Tribeca Yes Option 1 4S4WX86C564403975 21.7 12.9 100% 46% yes

Outback Yes Option 1 4S4BL84C654200024 22.9 15.0 100% 51% n/a

Forester Yes Option 1 JF1SH63649H001077 23.4 15.5 100% 50% n/a

Option 1: Primary Energy Absorbing Structure

Option 2: Secondary Energy Absorbing Structure

(a): Percent overlap of Part 581 zone.

(b): Percent of primary structure overlap of Part 581 zone.

(c): Full overlap of Part 581 zone for structure over 8 in. tall? (yes
or n/a)

**Page 2**

(2) **[Front-to-Side]{.underline}\--Percentage of Compliance: 100%**

> Meets

[Model]{.underline} [Guidelines]{.underline} [Method]{.underline} [Side
Air Baq]{.underline} [HIC]{.underline} [Test No.]{.underline}

Tribeca Yes 201 P Torso & Curtain 409 PC533XJ

Legacy Yes 201 P/IIHS Torso & Curtain 657/360 PG403ZOICES0411

Outback Yes 201 P Torso & Curtain 553 P1203ZO

lmpreza Yes 201 P Torso & Curtain 301 PE78P1Q

Forester Yes 201 P Torso & Curtain 365 PB36P3S

201P: HIC~36~ [\<]{.underline} 1000 (SIDIHIII)

IIHS: HIC~15~ [\<]{.underline} 779 (SID-11s)

Please contact me if you have questions or need any additional
information

Sincerely,

Maurice Arcangeli

Government Relations

Fuji Heavy Industries USA, Inc
(Page 2)

Date: February 26, 2005

From:

John A Tuttle (individual)

407 19^th^ Ave

Brick, New Jersey

08724-2605

#### Request for Comments #1 (Posted February 16, 2005 ) 

Statements submitted in connection with the panel\'s first request for
comments must be received

by the Advisory Panel no later than 5:00 p.m. on March 18, 2005.
**Please be aware that all**

**comments will be made available to the public.**

**At this time, the Panel is soliciting comments on the following
questions:**

1.  Headaches, unnecessary complexity, and burdens that taxpayers - both
    individuals and businesses - face because of the existing system.

Let's start with the fact that it takes nearly a month to collect all
the data required to begin filing

a tax return. Next, even with all of the programs I have to keep track
of all the money I spend, I

must still have the paper documents that back up every expenditure.
Next, there is no way that

the average person can do their own taxes. The laws keep changing and
you need a degree in

accounting just to understand how expenditures are classified.

2.  Aspects of the tax system that are unfair.

Let's start with the fact that every dollar we earn is taxed and that we
have to prove to the

Government which dollars should be exempt from being taxed in order to
get that tax back.

Also, the Government gets to use the money that's withheld from our
paycheck for up to a year

without paying any interest.

3.  Specific examples of how the tax code distorts important business or
    personal decisions.

Last year I worked 12-16 hours a day, six days a week to eliminate all
of my credit card debt. By

September, my debts were paid and I started putting money in a savings
account. By the end of

(Page 3)

year I had saved \$7,000. Two weeks ago, the accountant who is doing my
taxes called to tell me

that I owe an additional \$3,500 in taxes on top of the \$6286 that I
paid during the tax year. My

taxable income for the year was less than \$30,000. Now I have to rob
money from my savings to

pay my income taxes. As I see it, the Government will end up with 50% of
the money I worked so

hard to save. This year, I won't work so hard!!!

4.  Goals that the Panel should try to achieve as it evaluates the
    existing tax system and recommends options for reform.

Find a way to tax those who buy things they don't need to survive. Don't
tax the money used for

basic needs. Collect taxes based on previous years earnings and
expenditures. The idea of

paying taxes in advance and having to beg to get some of the money back
is plain wrong. A

much more fair system would involve a consumption tax. Next to that
would be a flat tax based

on net profit.
**Competitive Sourcing Team Meeting Minutes**

**April 18, 2006**

**Attendees**: Donna Kalvels -- DOI, CCSE; Dan Ertel -- CCSE; Marlo
Allen-CCSE; Paul Hoffman-PAHR; Marcia Cash-FWS; Michael Wright-OSM;
Kathie Libby, Joe Federline, Rebecca Mack-BLM; Jim Poole-NPS; VIA PHONE:
Connie Rough, Scott Morton, Beth Cox-USGS; Jacque Medina-BOR; Kathy
Garrity, Jim McCaffery-FWS; Caroline Laiken, Terry Grush-MMS

**Announcements:**

-   President Bush has nominated Paul Dennett as head of OFPP

-   The passing of Mike Fansler

-   The Competitive Sourcing office is moving to room 2044

## [Discussion Points:]{.underline}

-   **Paul Hoffman introduction and comments**

    -   "Messaging" has been an issue with Competitive Sourcing

    -   Competitions should be done to prove the process is working

    -   Make sure to compete the right function and look at this on a
        functional basis not a unit basis

    -   The money saved by competitive sourcing can be used for mission
        delivery.

    -   Paul is eager to help

-   **Update on FAIR Act evaluations**

    -   We are trying to find examples of good and bad justifications,
        and will be coming back to the offices with our suggestions on
        how to be accurate and consistent.

    -   We should be finished with our analysis by Mid May.

    -   The offices will have 2-3 weeks to make the changes.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **Coding and position of disabled individuals in competitive
    sourcing**

    -   Working with the Office of Civil Rights on a memo

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **IG audit of cost savings**

    -   OMB has asked the IG office to check our adherence to the budget

    -   IG says we have overstated and understated our savings. We will
        work with the Bureaus involved and the IG to reconcile this
**Species of the Connecticut River Watershed with No Sites in the
Watershed Recorded or Verified after 1969**

(from the Silvio O. Conte National Fish and Wildlife Refuge Final Action
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, October, 1995, U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Hadley, MA)

Scientific name Common name

*Achillea borealis* Northern yarrow

*Arctostaphylos alpina* Alpine manzanita

*Asclepias variegata* White milkweed

*Asio flammeus* Short‑eared owl

*Aster ciliolatus* Ciliated aster

*Betula minor* Dwarf white birch

*Blephilia ciliata* Downy woodmint

*Blephilia hirsuta* Hairy woodmint

*Calamagrostis stricta var. inexpansa* Neglected reed bent‑grass

*Carex davisii* Davis sedge

*Carex lenticularis var. albimontana* Lens sedge

*Castilleja septentrionalis* Labrador indian‑paintbrush

*Chenopodium boscianum* Bosc\'s pigweed

*Corydalis aurea* Golden corydalis

*Deschampsia atropurpurea* Mountain hairgrass

*Gentianella quinquefolia* Stiff gentian

*Isanthus brachiatus* False pennyroyal

*Muhlenbergia capillaris* Long‑awn hairgrass

*Onosmodium virginianum* Virginia false‑gromwell

*Panicum amarum* Panic grass

*Picoides tridactylus* Three‑toed woodpecker

*Prenanthes serpentaria* Lion\'s foot

*Salix herbacea* Dwarf willow

*Saurus cernuus* Lizard\'s tail

*Scleria triglomerata* Tall nut‑sedge

*Calamagrostis lacustris* Pond reedgrass

*Calamagrostis pickeringii* Pickering\'s reed bent‑grass

*Lachnanthes caroliana* Carolina redroot

*Pinus banksiana* Jack pine

*Polygonum setaceum var. interjectum* Strigose knotweed

*Prunus americana* American or wild plum

*Salix pellita* Satin willow

*Salix planifolia* Tea‑leaved willow

*Sorex dispar* Long‑tailed shrew

*Carex buxbaumii* Brown bog sedge

*Lasiurus cinereus* Hoary bat

*Mitoura hesseli* Hessel\'s hairstreak

*Carex cumulata* Clustered sedge

*Carex diandra* Lesser panicled sedge

*Carex oligosperma* Few‑seeded sedge

*Chamaecyparis thyoides* Atlantic white cedar

*Chenopodium rubrum* Coast‑blite goosefoot

*Eragrostis hypnoides* Moss love‑grass

*Gentiana andrewsii* Fringe‑top bottle gentian

*Geranium carolinianum var. carolinianum* Carolina cranesbill

*Isoetes macrospora* Large‑spored quillwort

*Limosella subulata* Awl‑leaf mudwort

*Megalodonta beckii* Beck\'s water‑marigold

*Nuphar microphyllum* Tiny cow‑lily

*Ranunculus micranthus* Tiny‑flowered crowfoot

*Rosa acicularis* Northern prickly rose

*Scirpus polyphyllus* Many‑leaved bulrush

*Sphenopholis pensylvanica* Swamp oats

*Stachys tenuifolia* Smooth hedge‑nettle
# Relevant Legislation and Policy

This page contains brief summaries of and links to legislation and
policies that have a bearing on the establishment, operation, and
benefits of Federal alternative officing programs.

**40 USC 587 \[codified from PL 107-217\] 2003**

**§ 587(c). Telecommuting and other alternative workplace arrangements**

This legislation makes the following requirement: In considering whether
to acquire space, quarters, buildings, or other facilities for use by
employees, the head of an executive agency shall consider whether needs
can be met using alternative workplace arrangements (hoteling,
telecommuting, virtual offices, other distributed workplace
arrangements, etc.)

<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ217.107>

\[\[Page 116 STAT. 1113\]\]

## Public Law 106-346, Section 359, October 23, 2000

In accordance with Public Law 106-346, Section 359, October 23, 2000,
each Executive agency will establish a policy under which eligible
employees of the agency may participate in telecommuting to the maximum
extent possible without diminished

employee performance.

<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ346.106>

(Page \[\[Page 114 STAT. 1356A-36\]\]

**Executive Order 13327: "Federal Real Property Asset Management"
(February 4, 2004)\
**To promote the efficient and economical use of Federal real property
resources in accordance with their value as national assets and in the
best interests of the Nation\
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/02/20040204-1.html>

**H. R. 2548: A Bill to amend chapter 5 of subtitle I of title 40,
United States**

## Code, to enhance Federal asset management, and for other purposes. 

## (June 19, 2003 - 108TH Congress)

This aim of this bill is to reform Federal property management. The
language that is most relevant to alternative officing is in Section 4:
Incentives For Real and Personal Property (a) Agency Retention of
Proceeds from Real and Personal Property. Essentially, this provision
will permit agencies to retain proceeds resulting from the transfer or
disposition of real property such as proceeds from alternative officing
arrangements that reduce facility costs.

<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&docid=f:h2548ih.txt.pdf>

(page 29)
4075.12 REV

APPENDIX 2

ALTERNATIVE PARAGRAPH 1.

FOR TRUST DEED

1\. This grant is for the benefit of the present and future owners of

all and each of the properties now or hereafter connected to the said

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_system, as well as the holders of the
mortgages covering

each of the properties, and the Trustee shall hold title to the property

granted by this indenture until, as provided below, the indenture shall

be of no further effect.

\(a\) The Trustee shall transfer the
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_system,

facilities and other property granted by this indenture to a

Governmental authority or to a public-utility company controlled

by a State Public Commission or similar body which undertakes

to operate and maintain the \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_system (1) at the
request

of, and upon such terms and conditions as may be approved

by, the owner or owners of a majority of the properties connected

to the \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_system, or (2) upon the issuance of a

judicial decree requiring such transfer. The Grantor shall

have no rights with respect to such transfer of the system,

facilities and property, and shall not be entitled to any

portion of the proceeds, if any, resulting from such transfer.

The term \"transfer\" as used herein shall include, but is not

limited to, transfer by sale or as the result of condemnation

proceedings. Immediately upon such transfer this indenture

shall be of no further effect.

\(b\) In the event other adequate \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_service is

provided by Governmental authority through means other than the

operation of the \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_system and facilities
transferred

to the Trustee herein, the provisions of this indenture

relating to the operation and maintenance of the
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

system shall be of no effect; but the Trustee shall, under

such circumstances, dispose of the system, facilities and

property covered by this indenture upon such terms and conditions

as may be approved by the owner or owners of a majority

of the properties connected to the \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_system. The Grantor

shall have no rights with respect to such disposition of the

system, facilities and property, and shall not be entitled to

any portion of the proceeds, if any, resulting from said

disposition. Immediately upon such disposition of the system,

this indenture shall be of no further effect.

9/76

HUD-Wash., D. C.
# Inspector's Checklist

-   Determination of areas needing removal of unsound concrete. (Sound
    with Hammer and Chain, mark with paint, verify all unsound Concrete
    is removed)

-   Verification of proper surface preparation.(1/4" on initial
    scarification, all exposed surfaces including reinforcing bars shall
    be sandblasted and kept clean until placement of Latex overlay)

-   Testing of approved raw materials.(Latex Admixture, Cement, water
    and Aggregates must meet the requirements of the contract)

-   A check of proper ingredient proportioning and mixer
    operation.(Verify calibration of trucks in compliance with attached
    guidelines)

-   Testing of mixed material.(If trial batch is mixed and during
    placement of overlay)

-   A check of proper installation of forms.(Forms for full depth areas
    can be suspended from reinforcing if less than 0.5 m2, if larger
    they must be supported by superstructure or shored from below
    --refer to contract specifications)

-   Conformance to line and grade.(Verify the gradeline has been
    approved and bulkheads are set to match finished grade; Steel
    extrusions for deck joints should set --2mm to

    --5mm from finished grade)

-   Support Rails for finishing machine must be set to grade in
    compliance with specifications and anchorage must be approved by
    Project Manager

-   Proper spacing of and adequate cover on reinforcement. (Verify bars
    have 20mm clearance around and minimum splice length is provided
    =0.30m)

-   Monitor weather conditions prior to/and during placement. (Critical
    to quality finished product, problems with finishing and surface
    sealing may be encountered when rate of evaporation exceeds 0.49
    kg/m2/h or 0.10 lbs/ft2/h)

-   Verify placement of Mortar for Bonding.(All surfaces must receive a
    thorough coating of mortar, dispose of coarse aggregates and don't
    allow fluids to settle low spots)

-   Adequate consolidation during placement.( Hand vibrators should be
    used for areas deeper than 75mm and along edges/ bulkheads)

-   Proper finishing techniques. (Minimize hand finishing, use wood
    floats and Fresno only)

-   Suitable surface texturing.(Burlap drag, light brooming and machine
    grooving as per specifications)

-   Proper curing techniques.( Double layer of clean wet burlap, placed
    as soon as possible, 15-20minutes,maintain wet cure for 48 hours)

-   Record keeping. (Daily reports, Calibrations, Concrete reports etc.)
PUBLIC NOTICE![](media/image1.png){width="0.6159722222222223in"
height="0.6222222222222222in"}

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12TH STREET, S.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 **DA 00-1541**

News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet:
http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov

**CABLE SERVICES BUREAU ACTION July 11, 2000**

MEDIACOM PETITION FOR WAIVER FROM REQUIREMENT TO

PROVIDE POINT OF DEPLOYMENT MODULES

# CSR 5569-Z

Pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 76.7,
Mediacom Communications Corporation ("Mediacom") filed a petition for
special relief requesting a waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 76.1204. Mediacom
seeks a waiver from the requirement to offer point of deployment modules
("PODs") for some of its cable systems.

Pursuant to Section 1.1208, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §
1.1208, this proceeding is designated as restricted for purposes of the
Commission's *ex parte* rules.

Comments and oppositions to Mediacom's petition must be filed by July
20, 2000. Replies are due July 31, 2000. All filings should reference
the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5569-Z.

The petition is available for public inspection in the Commission\'s
Reference Information Center:

445 12^th^ Street, S.W.

Room CY A-257

Washington, D.C. 20554

202-418-7092

Copies of the Petition and other pleadings are available for purchase
from:

ITS, Inc.

1231 20^th^ Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036

202-857-3800 (p)

202-857-3805 (f)

http://www/itsdoc.com

Media Contact: Michelle Russo at (202) 418-2358

Cable Services Bureau Contact: Thomas Horan at (202) 418-2486

TTY: (202) 418-7172

---FCC---

Approved for publication in the Daily Digest:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Deborah Klein

Division Chief, Consumer Protection and Competition Division, Cable
Services Bureau
Background:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The Office of AIDS Research requests the contractor to prepare a check
for \$4,000 in support for travel scholarships for young researchers to
attend the Argentinean Society for Virology (ASV) to be held in
Vaquerias City, Province of Cordoba, Argentina, in November 2007.

Description of Work:

The Contractor will complete the following tasks.

1\. Issue a check for \$4,000.

Make check payable to: Asociacion Argentina de Microbiologia

c/o Dra. Maria Mercedes Avila

Dto. de Microbiologia, Fac. de Medicina, UBA

Paraguay 2155, piso 11

C1121ABG

Buenos Aires, Argentina

2\. Deliver check to: Karen Watts-Green

5635 Fishers Lane

Rockville, Maryland 20892
Large-Scale Biomolecule Calculations Using Parallel Computers

Lizhi Ouyang

Department of Physics, University of Missouri-Kansas City

ABSTRACT

The B~12~ (cobalamin) based enzymes are important biomelecules whose
cofactors contain a rare metal-carbon (Co-C) bond. All the currently
known reactions of B~12~-dependent coenzymes involve the making and
breaking of the Co-C bond. Previous studies based on simple model
systems such as cobaloximes or LCo(DH~2~)R (L=base,R=alkyl, and
DH=monoanion of dimethylglyoxime), have provided some insight into the
factors affecting the Co-C bond, but none is conclusive. The main reason
is the lack of information on the electronic structure of the coblamins.
Such knowledges require rigorous quantum mechanical calculations. But
the lack of accurate structures of B12-enzymes hindered the
calculations. Only recently, structures of some cobalamins have been
determined with high resolution using synchrotron radiation facilities.

With about 800 atoms in the unit cell, the experimentally determined B12
crystal structure is prohibitively large for first-principles
calculations. Our preliminary calculation with only one B12 molecule
(196 atoms) in the unit cell took more than 12 days using a DEC 21264
CPU. For more realistic calculations, parallel computing is the only
solution. Parallel computing can significantly reduce the calculation
time but its success is critically dependent on the parallelability of
the algorithms for certain computer architectures. Principally, like
other quantum mechanical method, the OLCAO program can be well
parallized. In the past, I developed a HPF version of the OLCAO program
but it did not scale well. The main difficulty lies that the OLCAO
matrix elements are calculated in an irregular block pattern that is not
easy to do with HPF. Also, HPF lacks a good parallelized linear algebra
library such as SCALAPACK, which is included in the ACTS tool kit. It
would be wise to devote the efforts to modify the OLCAO program using
the explicit message passing program model (MPI/PVM) and the advanced
ACTS tool kits, which can be of much better scalability. Hence, I intend
to use NERSC facilities and the software tools developed there to
facilitate our research on Biomolecules.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation Docket No. CP08-31-000

NOTICE OF SITE VISIT

(June 25, 2008)

On July 9, 2008, staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will
conduct a site visit of the Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation's
proposed Sentinel Expansion Project -- Downingtown Mainline "A"
Replacement. The purpose of this site visit is to review the residential
areas potentially affected by the proposed replacement of mainline "A"
and to look at potential alternatives.

Interested parties may accompany staff during its visit and should meet
at 10:00 am (EDT) at:

Target

Western Parking Lot closest to North Pottstown Pike

201 Sunrise Boulevard

Exton, PA 19341

FERC Contact Phone Number (day of the site visit): (202) 502-6352

Those planning to accompany staff during its visit must provide their
own transportation.

For additional information, please contact the Commission\'s Office of
External Affairs at 1-866-208-FERC.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.
**§3.15 Computation of service.**

For nonservice-connected or service-connected benefits, active service
is countable exclusive of time spent on an industrial, agricultural, or
indefinite furlough, time lost on absence without leave (without pay),
under arrest (without acquittal), in desertion, while undergoing
sentence of court-martial or a period following release from active duty
under the circumstances outlined in §3.9. In claims based on
Spanish-American War service, leave authorized under General Order No.
130, War Department, is included.

\[40 FR 16064, Apr. 9, 1975\]

**Cross reference:** Duty periods. See §3.6(b)(6).
> DA 06-2059
>
> Released: October 25, 2006

**FCC Announces Change of Venue for November 3^rd^ Consumer Advisory
Committee Meeting**

By this Public Notice, the Federal Communications Commission
("Commission") announces a change in venue for the November 3, 2006
meeting of its Consumer Advisory Committee ("Committee"). The original
date, time and agenda of the Committee's meeting was announced via
Public Notice released on October 12, 2006 (DA 06-1998), as published in
the Federal Register 71 FR 61470 (October 18, 2006). This change of
venue was necessary because of unforeseen circumstances which
made adequate meeting facilities at the Commission\'s headquarters
building unavailable.

**Meeting Location, Date and Time**

The November 3, 2006 meeting of the Committee will take place from 9:00
A.M. to 4:00 P.M., at Verizon Communications, Inc., 1320 North
Courthouse Road, Arlington, VA in rooms Forum I and II.

The Committee is organized under, and operates in accordance with, the
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 2
(1988). A meeting transcript and minutes of the meeting are available
for public inspection at the FCC. Members of the public may address the
Committee or may send written comments to: Scott Marshall, Designated
Federal Officer of the Committee. <scott.marshall@fcc.gov>.

The meeting site is fully accessible to people using wheelchairs or
other mobility aids. Meeting agendas and handouts will be provided in
accessible formats; sign language interpreters, open captioning, and
assistive listening devices will be provided on site. The meeting will
not be webcast. Request other reasonable accommodations for people with
disabilities as early as possible; please allow at least five (5) days
advance notice. Include a description of the accommodation you will need
including as much detail as you can. Also include a way we can contact
you if we need more information. Send an e-mail to: <fcc504@fcc.gov> or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice),
202-418-0432 (TTY).

**For further information contact:** Scott Marshall, Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Federal Communications Commission,
202-418-2809 (voice) or 202-418-0179 (TTY), <scott.marshall@fcc.gov>
(e-mail).

\- FCC -
# NY I85617

August 29, 2002

CLA-2-62:RR:NC:WA355 I85617

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 6203.43.4030

Mr. R. Trace Garrett

Associated Merchandising Corporation

500 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 100018

RE: The tariff classification of men's nylon shorts from China

Dear Mr. Garrett:

In your letter dated August 26, 2002, you requested a classification
ruling.

You submitted a sample of a men's short identified as style MSW1004
which will be returned as you have requested. The shell of the short is
made of 100 percent nylon woven fabric. The garment features an
elasticized waistband, a knit mesh liner, and a webbed belt that is
tunneled through the waistband and that secures by means of a plastic
buckle. There are two side slash pockets with mesh fabric for pocketing
material, two front leg cargo pockets that zipper shut and that have
tiny holes at each bottom corner of the pockets, ostensibly for
drainage, and one back pocket that zippers shut and that has mesh fabric
for pocketing material. Although the submitted sample has an interior
drawstring, you state in your letter that the garment when imported will
not have a drawstring; only a webbed belt.

The applicable subheading for style MSW1004 will be 6203.43.4030,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides
for men's or boys' trousers, bib and brace overalls, breeches and
shorts, of synthetic fibers, other, other, other, other, shorts, men's.
The duty rate will be 28.3 percent ad valorem.

Style MSW1004 falls within textile category designation 647. Based upon
international textile trade agreements products of China are subject to
quota and the requirement of a visa.

The designated textile and apparel categories and their quota and visa
status are the result of international agreements that are subject to
frequent renegotiations and changes. To obtain the most current
information, we suggest that you check, close to the time of shipment,
the [U.S. Customs Service Textile Status Report]{.underline}, an
internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available at the
Customs Web site at www.customs.gov. In addition, the designated textile
and apparel categories may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and
quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected
and should also be verified at the time of shipment.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the
Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact
National Import Specialist Camille R. Ferraro at 646-733-3046.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski

Director,

National Commodity

Specialist Division
The National Energy Technology Laboratory will be hosting a
Pre-Application Webcast for the Clean Coal Power Initiative Round 3
(CCPI-3). The webcast will be held on Thursday November 20, 2008 at
1:00-4:00 PM Eastern Time. The purpose of this CCPI-3 Pre-Application
Webcast is to answer questions from organizations currently in the
process of writing applications in response to the CCPI-3 Funding
Opportunity Announcement. CCPI-3 Applications are due to NETL on January
15, 2009.

The visual portion of the webcast will be accessed through an internet
connection and the audio portion will be accessed through a telephone
conference call. Questions may be submitted by email at
CCPI.Questions@netl.doe.gov or by phone during the webcast.

For general questions regarding the CCPI webcast, please contact
Brittley Robbins at 412-386-5430.

Original instructions to join the Instant Net Conference were incorrect.
Corrected instructions to join the Instant Net Conference to view the
presentation materials are as follows:

1\. Join the meeting now:

<http://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join.php?i=746227115&p=10302008&t=c>

2\. Enter the required fields.

3\. Indicate that you have read the Privacy Policy.

4\. Click on Proceed.

Instant Net Conference Details:

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

Meeting Number: 746227115

Meeting Passcode: 10302008

Meeting Host: NETL Conf Support

Meeting Date: 11/20/08

Meeting Time: 1:00 PM EASTERN TIME

Contact: Ms Stacey Hoover

Phone Number 304-285-4055 or 4656

Instructions to join the Audio Conference to hear the speaker's
presentation and participate in the conference call are as follows:

Participant Passcode: 38945

Toll Free Number: 888-469-1086

Contact: Ms Vicki Hamrick

Phone Number: 304-285-4764

The following features are available for you to use on your phone during
an active conference: Press \*0 operator assistance (small fee may
apply), and Press \*6 mute/unmute individual line.
**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION**

![](media/image1.png){width="0.84375in" height="0.84375in"}**ENFORCEMENT
BUREAU**

WESTERN REGION

**San Diego Office**

4542 Ruffner Street, Suite 370

San Diego, CA 92111

April 13, 2006

Donald A. Payne

San Diego, CA 92102

**NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION**

Case Number: EB-06-SD-052

Document Number: W20063294002

The San Diego Office received information that an unlicensed broadcast
radio station on 96.9 MHz was allegedly operating at 1937 33^rd^ Street,
San Diego. On April 3, 2006, agents from this office confirmed by
direction finding techniques that radio signals on frequency 96.9 MHz
were emanating from 1937 33^rd^ Street, San Diego. The Commission's
records show that no license was issued for operation of a broadcast
station at this location on 96.9 MHz in San Diego, California.

Radio stations must be licensed by the FCC pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 301.
The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain
transmitters using or operating at a power level that complies with the
standards established in Part 15 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
§§  15.1 *et seq*. Your operation on frequency 96.9 MHz was measured at
71,949 microvolts per meter (µV/m) at 81 meters. This exceeds the
allowable unlicensed limit of 250 µV/m at 3 meters established in Part
15. Thus, this station is operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 301.

You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment
without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of
the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator of this
illegal operation to severe penalties, including, but not limited to,
substantial monetary forfeitures, *in rem* arrest action against the
offending radio equipment, and criminal sanctions including
imprisonment. (*See* 47 U.S.C. §§ 401, 501, 503 and 510).

**UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THIS RADIO STATION MUST BE DISCONTINUED
IMMEDIATELY**.

You have ten (10) days from the date of this notice to respond with any
evidence that you have authority to operate granted by the FCC. Your
response should be sent to the address in the letterhead and reference
the listed case and document number. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3), we are informing you that the Commission's staff
will use all relevant material information before it to determine what,
if any, enforcement action is required to ensure your compliance with
FCC Rules. This will include any information that you disclose in your
reply.

You may contact this office if you have any questions.

William R. Zears Jr.

District Director

San Diego Office

Attachments:

Excerpts from the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended

Enforcement Bureau, \"Inspection Fact Sheet\", July 2003
# COLLEGE ACCESS CHALLENGE GRANT PROGRAM

Tentative Allocation Table

As of January 2008

**Appropriation** \$66,000,000

**Minimum Allocation** \$ 330,000

  ---- --------------- --------------- ---- ---------------- ----------------
       STATE           ALLOCATION           STATE            ALLOCATION

  01   Alabama         1,128,810       31   New Jersey       1,097,047

  02   Alaska          330,000         32   New Mexico       556,798

  03   Arizona         1,348,705       33   New York         4,017,131

  04   Arkansas        706,129         34   North Carolina   1,898,671

  05   California      7,678,868       35   North Dakota     330,000

  06   Colorado        852,698         36   Ohio             2,268,044

  07   Connecticut     419,180         37   Oklahoma         915,434

  08   Delaware        330,000         38   Oregon           697,006

  09   District of     330,000         39   Pennsylvania     2,105,061
       Columbia                                              

  10   Florida         3,116,708       40   Rhode Island     330,000

  11   Georgia         2,089,027       41   South Carolina   989,701

  12   Hawaii          330,000         42   South Dakota     330,000

  13   Idaho           330,000         43   Tennessee        1,410,814

  14   Illinois        2,411,050       44   Texas            6,262,491

  15   Indiana         1,223,581       45   Utah             433,354

  16   Iowa            474,145         46   Vermont          330,000

  17   Kansas          501,584         47   Virginia         1,010,008

  18   Kentucky        1,019,425       48   Washington       1,116,302

  19   Louisiana       1,239,533       49   West Virginia    448,769

  20   Maine           330,000         50   Wisconsin        911,111

  21   Maryland        615,592         51   Wyoming          330,000

  22   Massachusetts   879,879         52   Puerto Rico      2,594,690

  23   Michigan        2,092,786       53   American Samoa   330,000

  24   Minnesota       735,025         54   Guam             330,000

  25   Mississippi     932,499         55   Northern Mariana 330,000

  26   Missouri        1,148,535       56   Virgin Islands   330,000

  27   Montana         330,000         57   Freely           330,000
                                            Associated       
                                            States           

  28   Nebraska        330,000         58                    

  29   Nevada          383,809         59                    

  30   New Hampshire   330,000         60                    
  ---- --------------- --------------- ---- ---------------- ----------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  The allocations for the outlying areas and freely associated states are
  based on population estimates.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
ONCOLOGIC DRUGS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

##### CHAIR

Donna Przepiorka, M.D., Ph.D. 6/30/04

University of Tennessee

Department of Hematology/Oncology

#### 1331 Union Ave., Ste 800

#### Memphis, Tennessee 38139

**EXECUTIVE SECRETARY**

Karen M. Templeton-Somers, Ph.D.

Advisors & Consultants Staff, HFD-21

Food and Drug Administration

5600 Fishers Lane

Rockville, Maryland 20857

\(301\) 827-7001 FAX (301) 827-6776

<SomersK@cder.fda.gov>

# MEMBERS

Douglas W. Blayney, M.D. 6/30/03

Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Inc.

50 Bellefontaine Street, Suite 304

Pasadena, California 91105

David P. Kelsen, M.D. 6/30/03

Chief, Gastrointestinal Oncology Service

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

1275 York Avenue

New York, New York 10021

Scott M. Lippman, M.D. 6/30/03

Professor of Medicine and Cancer Prevention

The University of Texas

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention

1515 Holcombe Blvd., HMB 11.192c, Box 236

Houston, Texas 77030

**[Consumer Representative]{.underline}**

Jody L. Pelusi, F.N.P., Ph.D. 6/30/03

N. Arizona Hematology & Oncology Associates

Sedona Cancer Center

3700 W. HWY 89-A

Sedona, Arizona 86336

### John T. Carpenter, Jr., M.D. 6/30/04

### Professor of Medicine

### Division of Hematology and Oncology

University of Alabama at Birmingham

1530 3^rd^ Avenue South

M226G, RWUH

Birmingham, Alabama 35294-3280

Bruce G. Redman, D.O. 6/30/04

### Associate Professor of Internal Medicine

Division of Hematology/Oncology

University of Michigan

Comprehensive Cancer Center

7216 Cancer Center

### 1500 East Medical Center Drive

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0948

Sarah A. Taylor, M.D. 6/30/04

Professor of Medicine

Medical Director, Palliative Care Services

Division of Clinical Oncology

University of Kansas Medical Center

3901 Rainbow Boulevard

Kansas City, Kansas 66160-7353

Otis W. Brawley, M.D. 6/30/05

Associate Director for Cancer Control

Professor of Medicine, Oncology and Epidemiology

Winship Cancer Institute

Emory University School of Medicine

1365-B Clifton Road Suite B-4100

#### Atlanta, Georgia 30322 

#### 

#### Stephen L. George, Ph.D. 6/30/05

Professor of Biostatistics

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics

Box 3958, Hanes House, Room 219

Trent Drive at Erwin Road

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina 27710

Bruce D. Cheson, M.D. 6/30/06

Head of Hematology, Lombardi Cancer Center

Georgetown University Hospital

3800 Reservoir Road, NW

Washington, D.C. 20007

Silvana Martino, D.O. 6/30/06

Head, Medical Oncology- Breast Cancer Section

John Wayne Cancer Institute - St. Johns Health Center

2001 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 860W

Santa Monica, California 90404

Gregory H. Reaman, M.D. 6/30/06

Executive Director, Center for Cancer & Blood Disorders

Dept. of Hematology/Oncology

Children's National Medical Center

### 111 Michigan Avenue NW 

Washington, D.C. 20010
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  IgG

  IgG

  H1V + V1

  H1M + M1

  H2V + V2

  H2M + M2

  H3V + V3

  H3M + M3
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  IgG Neg Con

  IgG Neg Con

  Vector #1

  MCT1 #1

  Vector #2

  MCT1 #2

  Vector #3

  MCT1 #3
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Illumina Oligonucleotide microarray**

**A 0.01- 0.5ug aliquot of total RNA from each sample was labeled using
the Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion; Austin, TX, cat \#
IL1791). RNA was first converted into single-stranded cDNA using reverse
transcription with an oligo-dT primer containing the T7 RNA polymerase
promoter, then the single-stranded cDNA was copied to produce
double-stranded cDNA molecules. The double-stranded cDNA was used in an
overnight *in vitro* transcription reaction where single-stranded RNA
(cRNA) was generated and labeled by incorporating biotin-16-UTP. A total
of 0.85ug of biotin-labeled cRNA was hybridized for 16 hours to
Illumina\'s Sentrix MouseRef-8 Expression BeadChips (Illumina, San
Diego, CA). Each BeadChip has 24,000 well-annotated RefSeq transcripts
per sample with approximately 30-fold redundancy. The arrays were washed
and then blocked. The bound biotinylated cRNA was detected with the
addition of streptavidin-Cy3 and quantitated using Illumina\'s
BeadStation 500GX Genetic Analysis Systems scanner. The image data was
extracted using BeadStudio software, version 1.5 (Illumina).**
**DA 05-1333**

May 12, 2005

Chris Kelsay

Engineering Associates, Inc.

3312 Northside Dr., D-234

Macon, GA 31210

> Re: File No. SES-REG-20050415-00505

Dear Mr. Kelsay:

On April 15, 2005, Progressive Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc., filed
by paper a C-Band Receive-Only Earth Station Registration application.
For reasons discussed below, we dismiss the application as defective,
without prejudice to refiling.[^1]

A review of the application has revealed the submitted Frequency
Coordination and Interference Analysis Report is dated September 2004.
Section 25.115(C)(iii) [^2] of the Commission's rules requires
re-coordination if the Schedule B is not filed within six months. In
addition, as of November 5, 2004, all filings on Form 312 must be
submitted electronically through IBFS. [^3]

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1)[^4] of the Commission's
Rules, we dismiss your application, without prejudice.

> Sincerely,

Scott A. Kotler

Chief, Systems Analysis Branch

Satellite Division

[^1]: If Progressive Rural Telephone Coop., Inc refiles an application
    identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the
    missing information, it need not pay an application fee. *See* 47
    C.F.R.§ 1.1109(d).

[^2]: 47 C.F.R. § 25.115(C)(iii).

[^3]: Amendment of the Commission's Space Station Licensing Rules and
    Policies, 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review---Streamlining and the
    Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission's Rules Governing the
    Licensing of, and Spectrum Usage of Satellite Network Earth Stations
    and Space Stations, IB Docket Nos. 02-34 and 00-248. 19 FCC Rcd
    19564 (Int'l. Bur., 2004).

[^4]: 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1). *See also* Echostar Satellite LLC,
    *Order on Reconsideration*, DA 04-4056 (released December 27, 2004).
Background Document for Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee Meeting

##### March 17, 2004

**Room 1066, 5630 Fishers Lane**

**Rockville, MD**

**Document Prepared by: Submitted To:**

**Steven Hirschfeld, M.D. Johanna Clifford, MS, RN, BSN**

**HSM 755 HFD 21, Room 1085**

**1401 Rockville Pike 5630 Rockville Pike**

**Rockville, MD 20857 Rockville, MD 20857**

**\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

![](media/image1.wmf){width="1.4548611111111112in"
height="0.6569444444444444in"}

![](media/image2.png)

## Table of Contents

### 1. Points to Consider ...............................................................\....Page 1

### APPENDICES

[**Appendix A.** Safety monitoring in clinical studies enrolling
children with cancer.]{.underline}

1\. HHS Report to Congress Protecting Children in Research

2\. FDA Adaptation of Subpart D

3\. NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Children

4\. Belmont Report

5\. Helsinki Declaration

6\. ICH E11

7\. ICH E6

[**Appendix B.** Non-clinical data to complement clinical data for
pediatric oncology]{.underline}.

#### 1. Animal Imaging

2\. Animal Models and Osteoporosis

3\. Golub DNA Microarrays

4\. Limitations of Animal Models

5\. Mice as Drug Models

6\. Rat Genome Sequence

7\. Science Mouse Standards

8\. Scientific and Ethical Considerations of Animal Studies:

The Role of Xenografting in Pediatric Brain Tumors with

Specific Emphasis on Medulloblastoma/Primitive Neuroectodermal

Tumors of Childhood

9\. Childhood testing of new agents
MIKE \<muse.mike1@cox.net\>

08/29/2005 08:31 PM To

Group Ow-Docket@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject

ID number OW-2004-0035

Comments on draft survey of drinking water treatment facilities : The

discharge of drinking water treatment residuals into surface water or

ground water involve the pollutants that are regulated as drinking water

contaminants under §1412, SDWA. Such discharges likely pose a risk of

public exposure to those contaminants through down stream public water

supply intakes or down gradient public water supply wells. To assess

that risk of public exposure, and the need for ELGs to regulate such

discharges to surface water, the survey should include (would probably

need to require) discharge monitoring data of virtually all constituents

that are regulated as drinking water contaminants under the SDWA, in

addition to whatever other pollutants are of general interest under the

CWA. Please contact Mike Muse at 202.564.3892 if you have any questions

about this comment.