**Appeals Before The**

**Bankruptcy Appellate Panel**

**Of The Ninth Circuit**

**A MANUAL FOR LITIGANTS**

**Summer 2004**

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

**I. INTRODUCTION** 1

**II. JURISDICTION OF BAP** 1

**III. INTRODUCTION TO BAP** 2

**IV. PRACTICE BEFORE THE BAP** 4

**V. STARTING THE APPEAL PROCESS** 4

**VI. DESIGNATION OF THE RECORD** 11

**VII. MOTIONS** 13

**VIII. BRIEFING THE ISSUES** 19

**IX. ORAL ARGUMENT** 26

**X. SANCTIONS** 28

**XI. DECISIONS** 29

**XII. BAP DECISIONS AS PRECEDENT** 31

**XIII. INFORMATION AND STATISTICS** 32

**XIV. CONCLUSION** 32

**APPENDIX I - Do=s and Don=ts for an Effective Appeal** 33

**APPENDIX II - Traps for the Unwary** 35

**APPENDIX III - New Bankruptcy Appeal Filings - 2003 .** . . 37

**AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING THE BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL**

**OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT** 38

?.  INTRODUCTION[^1]

These materials are designed to assist counsel who find themselves
involved in a bankruptcy appeal before the BAP.

Appellate rules are found in Part VIII of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure (FRBP), Rule 8001 [et]{.underline}
[seq]{.underline}. Local rules of either the district court or the BAP
rules also apply. Revised local rules for practice before the BAP were
adopted by the Ninth Circuit Judicial Council on February 24, 2000, and
may be found on the BAP website at www.ce9.uscourts.gov/bap.

Where national and local rules are silent or where they so specify, the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP), the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure (FRCP), the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) or the Ninth
Circuit Rules (Circuit Rule) may apply. [See]{.underline} 9th Cir. BAP
R. 8018(b)-1.

I.  JURISDICTION OF BAP

Under the Bankruptcy Code the district court has always had the
jurisdiction to review decisions of a bankruptcy court. 28 U.S.C. \'
158(a).[^2] However, a circuit may establish a BAP, 28 U.S.C. \' 158(b),
and the Ninth Circuit has had BAP since the effective date of the
Bankruptcy Code, October 1, 1979.[^3] The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978,
which became effective on October 1, 1979, authorized the creation of
the BAP. Then, following the decision of [Northern Pipeline Constr. Co.
v Marathon Pipe Line Co.]{.underline}, 458 U.S. 50 (1982)(holding that
the Act unconstitutionally conferred the essential attributes of
judicial power on non-Article III bankruptcy judges), and passage of the
Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984, the Ninth
Circuit re-established the BAP by Order of the Judicial Council, in
1985. That order was most recently amended as of May 9, 2002, and is set
forth at the end of these materials.

II. INTRODUCTION TO BAP

Seven bankruptcy judges are authorized by the Ninth Circuit Judicial
Council to serve on the BAP. Each case is heard by a panel of three
judges. No bankruptcy judge may hear an appeal originating from his or
her district. 28 U.S.C. \' 158(b)(5).[^4]

The BAP judges are all active trial court judges from around the
circuit. All maintain a regular trial docket in their home districts.
Currently there are six members of BAP; the seventh position is being
intentionally left vacant to reflect the BAP=s reduced filing numbers
and to allow opportunities for *pro tem* judge participation. The
current members of BAP are:

> Hon. Elizabeth Perris (D. Ore), Chief Judge
>
> Hon. Philip H. Brandt (W.D. Wash)
>
> Hon. Christopher M. Klein (E.D. Cal)
>
> Hon. James M. Marlar (D. Ariz)
>
> Hon. Dennis Montali (N.D. Cal)
>
> Hon. Erithe Smith (C.D. Cal)

BAP judges are appointed by the Circuit for a seven-year term. At the
end of that term, they may seek reappointment for an additional three
years. Each BAP judge has an extra law clerk. Some of the judges utilize
both clerks on BAP matters and on their regular Ahome court@ assignments
while others divide the duties between their two clerks.

The BAP also utilizes *pro tem* judges on a routine basis in order to
give appellate experience to other bankruptcy judges within the Ninth
Circuit. Those judges sit for one-day merits calendar assignments and
have equal votes with the regular BAP judges. They normally do not
participate on motions. The contribution of the *pro tem* judges allows
the BAP to set more calendars and hear more cases than it could
otherwise. Collectively, the *pro tem* judges perform the work
equivalent of an additional BAP judge.

The BAP hears cases nine months out of the year with the three-judge
panels traveling to various venues in the Ninth Circuit. It does not
normally hold hearings during April, August and December. The BAP
continues to explore ways to utilize teleconferencing and video
conferencing and to expand technology in order to provide quicker and
more convenient hearings for lawyers and litigants. For this purpose,
the BAP has been able to use existing equipment in several districts.
For example, BAP hearings have been held several times in Las Vegas
where some of the cases originated from Reno, with those litigants
appearing by video. The panel has used a Santa Ana - Riverside
connection as well. Cases from Montana, Idaho, Eastern and Western
Washington, and Oregon have also been conducted by video. The Ninth
Circuit has video conferencing equipment in its Pasadena and San
Francisco courtrooms, and video-conference cases are often scheduled as
part of the regular hearing calendars at those locations.

The BAP is staffed by its Clerk, a Deputy Clerk, two staff attorneys,
and other personnel who maintain the files and dockets and otherwise run
the business of the court. The following is additional information about
the clerk=s office:

> [Address]{.underline}: Court of Appeals Building, 125 South Grand
> Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105
>
> [Telephone]{.underline}: appeals from Central District of California
> (626) 229-7220; appeals from all other districts (626) 229-7225.

[Filing Hours]{.underline}: Monday - Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

[Web Site]{.underline}: www.ce9.uscourts.gov/bap

[PACER Site]{.underline}: https://pacer.bap09.uscourts.gov

III. PRACTICE BEFORE THE BAP

To practice before the BAP, an attorney must be admitted and in good
standing to practice before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals or a
district court within the Ninth Circuit. An attorney not so admitted may
request permission to appear in a specific case by motion to the BAP.
9th Cir. BAP R. 9010-1.

Once a case has been set for oral argument, continuances are rarely
granted. By separate pleading or letter at the time of briefing, counsel
should advise the BAP Clerk of known scheduling conflicts occurring
during the third week of upcoming months when BAP arguments are likely
to be scheduled. The BAP Clerk will work with the parties to resolve
scheduling conflicts and other matters concerning argument. Prior to
contacting the Clerk, the movant should contact opposing counsel so that
the position of both sides may be conveyed.

IV. STARTING THE APPEAL PROCESS

> A. Time and Method for Filing a Notice of Appeal
>
> A notice of appeal must be filed with the bankruptcy court within 10
> calendar days of entry of the judgment, order, or decree appealed
> from. FRBP 8001(a), 8002, and 9006(a). If a timely notice of appeal is
> filed, any other party may file a notice of appeal (often a
> cross-appeal) within 10 days of the date on which the first notice of
> appeal was filed. [Id.]{.underline} The appellant must attach to the
> notice of appeal a copy of the entered judgment, order or decree from
> which the appeal was taken, if available. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8001(a)-1.
> The timely filing of a notice of appeal is Amandatory and
> jurisdictional.@ [Browder v. Director, Dep=t of
> Corrections]{.underline}, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978); [see
> also]{.underline} [Slimick v. Silva (In re Slimick)]{.underline}, 928
> F.2d 304, 306 (9th Cir. 1990).
>
> Discretionary extensions may be granted by the bankruptcy court, with
> some exceptions[^5], upon written motion. If a motion is filed
> [before]{.underline} the expiration of the original 10-day period, an
> extension may be given up to 20 days from the expiration of the time
> for filing a notice of appeal. If the motion is filed not later than
> 20 days after the expiration of the original 10-day period, an
> extension may be granted upon a showing of excusable neglect.
> [See]{.underline} [Pincay v. Andrews]{.underline} 351 F.3d 947 (9th
> Cir. 2003)(mistake by attorney in delegating task of determining
> appeal deadline to nonlawyer not considered excusable neglect). Such
> an extension may be up to 10 days from the date of entry of the order
> granting the motion. Once the appeal period has expired, it
> [cannot]{.underline} be resurrected. The panel may not extend the time
> requirements of FRBP 8002. *See* [Fed. R. Bankr. P.]{.underline} 8019
> and 9006(b)(3).
>
> B. Tolling Motions
>
> If, within 10 days of entry of the judgment, order or decree, a party
> files a motion (1) to amend or make additional findings of fact under
> FRBP 7052, (2) to alter or amend the judgment under FRBP 9023, (3) for
> a new trial under FRBP 9023, or (4) for relief under FRBP 9024, then
> the 10 days for filing an appeal runs from the entry of the order
> disposing of the last such motion outstanding. FRBP 8002(b). The BAP
> considers a motion for reconsideration filed within 10 days to be a
> motion to Aalter or amend the judgment@ within the meaning of FRBP
> 8002(b). [Bentley v. Bank of Coronado (In re Crystal Sands
> Props.)]{.underline}, 84 B.R. 665, 668 & n.3 (9th Cir. BAP 1988). *See
> generally* 16A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure \'
> 3950.4.
>
> C. Premature Notice of Appeal
>
> A premature notice of appeal (a notice of appeal filed after the
> announcement of a decision but before entry of the judgment or order)
> is treated as filed after such entry and on the day thereof. FRBP
> 8002(a). If the notice of appeal is filed before entry of the order
> being appealed, the appellant must forward to the BAP Clerk a copy of
> the judgment or order immediately upon entry. 9th Cir. BAP R.
> 8001(a)-1.
>
> D. Election to the District Court (Opt-Out)
>
> The appeal from the bankruptcy court automatically goes to the BAP
> unless a party timely elects to have the appeal heard by the district
> court. 28 U.S.C. \' 158(b)(1).
>
> A party might choose to have an appeal heard by the district court if
> other litigation or related appeals are already pending in the
> district court, or if there is adverse BAP authority on the party=s
> issue.

1.  The objection to having the appeal heard by the BAP must be made as
    a AStatement of Election@ in a separate writing. FRBP 8001(e);
    [Arkansas Teachers Ret. Sys. v. Official Inv. Pool Participants
    Comm. (In re County of Orange)]{.underline}, 183 B.R. 593 (9th Cir.
    BAP 1995) (election must be in a separate document, filed separately
    from the notice of appeal). Amended Order Continuing Bankruptcy
    Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit (Amended May 9, 2002).

2.  Deadline for filing Statement of Election. In [Ioane v. Collins (In
    re Ioane)]{.underline}, 227 B.R. 181, 183 (9th Cir. BAP 1998), the
    BAP held that the statutory deadline for making the election is the
    time the notice of appeal is filed (rather than the date that the
    order is entered), even if the notice of appeal is filed
    prematurely. If the appellant moves for leave to appeal but fails to
    concurrently file a separate notice of appeal, the motion for leave
    shall be treated as if it were a notice of appeal for purposes of
    calculating the time period for filing an election. 9th Cir. BAP R.
    8001(e)-1(b).

3.  AAny other party@ (e.g., the appellee) must make the election not
    later than 30 days after service of notice of the appeal. 28 U.S.C.
    \' 158(c)(1). In [HBI, Inc. v. Sessions Payroll Mgm=t, Inc. (In re
    Mackey)]{.underline}, 232 B.R. 784, 787 (9th Cir. BAP 1999), the BAP
    held that the 30-day deadline begins to run on the date of the
    court=s mailing, not the date that the order being appealed is
    entered, and that the 3-day extension provided for by FRBP 9006(f)
    applies when service is performed by mail, giving Aany other party@
    33 days to file the statement of election after the clerk serves the
    notice of appeal.

4.  The BAP Panel Amay transfer an appeal to the district court to
    further the interests of justice, such as when a timely statement of
    election has been filed in a related appeal, or for any other reason
    the Panel deems appropriate.@ 9th Cir. BAP 8001(e)-1.

> Under [Perroton v. Gray (In re Perroton)]{.underline}, 958 F.2d 889
> (9th Cir. 1992) and [Determan v. Sandoval (In re
> Sandoval)]{.underline}, 186 B.R. 490, 496 (9th Cir. BAP 1995), the BAP
> has no authority to grant *in forma pauperis* motions under 28 U.S.C.
> \' 1915(a) because bankruptcy courts are not \"court\[s\] of the
> United States\" as defined in 28 U.S.C. \' 451. Consequently BAP has
> transferred some of those motions and related appeals to the district
> court.
>
> E. Final Orders
>
> In general, the BAP has jurisdiction to hear bankruptcy appeals from
> final judgments, orders, and decrees. [See]{.underline} 28 U.S.C.
> \' 158. In addition, with leave of the Panel, the BAP has jurisdiction
> to hear appeals from certain interlocutory orders and decrees. 28
> U.S.C. \' 158; [see also]{.underline} [Official Comm. of Unsecured
> Creditors v. Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland, N.V. (In re NSB Film
> Corp.)]{.underline}, 167 B.R. 176, 180 (9th Cir. BAP 1994). *See
> generally* 16A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure

\' 3950.2.

> 1\. Definition of Finality
>
> The standard for determining finality in the bankruptcy context is
> more flexible than in other areas. [NSB Film Corp.]{.underline}, 167
> B.R. at 180. In contrast to an ordinary civil case where Aa complete
> act of adjudication ends the litigation on the merits and leaves
> nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment,@ a bankruptcy
> order is final if it Aend\[s\] any interim disputes from which appeal
> would lie.@ [Slimick]{.underline}, 928 F.2d at 307 n.1 (internal
> quotations and citations omitted). An order is appealable under the
> Aflexible finality@ doctrine if it A1) resolves and seriously affects
> substantive rights and 2) finally determines the discrete issue to
> which it is addressed.@ [Elliott v. Four Seasons Props., Inc. (In re
> Frontier Props., Inc.)]{.underline}, 979 F.2d 1358, 1363 (9th Cir.
> 1992). For a recent discussion of pragmatic finality in bankruptcy,
> see [Saxman v. Educ. Credit Mgt. Corp (In re Saxman)]{.underline}, 325
> F.3d 1168 (9th Cir. 2003) (and the dissent).
>
> Examples of orders held to be final are: orders granting or denying
> relief from stay, [In re Conejo Enters., Inc.]{.underline}, 96 F.3d
> 346, 351 (9th Cir. 1996); an order confirming a chapter 11 debtor=s
> reorganization plan, [Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey=s, Inc. (In re
> Pizza of Hawaii, Inc.)]{.underline}, 761 F.2d 1374 (9th Cir. 1985); an
> order allowing or disallowing an exemption, [In re Jones]{.underline},
> 768 F.2d 923 (9th Cir. 1985); an order substantively consolidating
> bankruptcy cases, [Alexander v. Compton (In re Bonham)]{.underline},
> 229 F.3d 750 (9th Cir. 2000); sale of property to a good-faith
> purchaser, [In re Southwest Products, Inc]{.underline}. 144 B.R. 100
> (9th Cir. BAP 1992), [but see]{.underline} [In re M Capital
> Corporation]{.underline} 290 B.R. 743 (9th Cir. BAP 2003); [In re
> Thomas]{.underline} 287 B.R. 782 (9th Cir. BAP 2002).
>
> Examples of orders held to be interlocutory are: denial of a motion to
> dismiss a bankruptcy case or adversary proceeding, [Dunkley v. Rega
> Props., Ltd. (In re Rega Props., Ltd.)]{.underline}, 894 F.2d 1136
> (9th Cir. 1990); [Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. CHG Int=l,
> Inc.]{.underline}, 811 F.2d 1209, 1214 (9th Cir. 1987); [Ditter v.
> Greenberg (In re Ditter)]{.underline}, 205 B.R. 213 (9th Cir. 1996);
> order denying a motion for summary judgment, [Comsource Independent
> Foodservice Cos., Inc. v. Union Pacific R. Co.]{.underline}, 102 F.3d
> 438, 441-42 (9th Cir. 1996); order imposing monetary sanctions against
> an attorney, [Cunningham v. Hamilton County, Ohio]{.underline}, 527
> U.S. 198 (1999). [But]{.underline} [see]{.underline} [Golant v. Levy
> (In re Golant)]{.underline}, 239 F.3d 931, 935 (7th Cir. 2001) (\"we
> were unable to uncover any cases discussing how
> [Cunningham]{.underline} might alter the long‑held view that sanctions
> which completely eliminate the possibility of a decision on the
> merits‑‑such as a default judgment or dismissal‑‑are \"final\" for the
> purpose of appeal.\"); [Reorganized Solomat Enters., Inc. v. Ibar (In
> re Solomat Partners, L.P.)]{.underline}, 231 B.R. 149, 151 (2d Cir.
> BAP 1999) (holding that denial of civil contempt motions was final and
> appealable); order granting motion to reopen a bankruptcy case,
> [Wilborn v. Gallagher (In re Wilborn)]{.underline}, 205 B.R. 202 (9th
> Cir. BAP 1996).
>
> Note: Finality for purposes of jurisdiction over Aas of right@ appeals
> under 28 U.S.C. \' 158(a)(1) in adversary proceedings does not differ
> from finality in ordinary federal civil actions under 28 U.S.C.
> \' 1291, thus FRCP 54(b) applies. [Belli v. Temkin (In re
> Belli)]{.underline}, 268 B.R. 851 (9th Cir BAP 2001).
>
> 2\. Separate Document Rule
>
> FRBP 9021 requires that the order/judgment appealed must be entered on
> a separate document. FRBP 9021, making applicable FRCP 58; [Corrigan
> v. Bargala]{.underline}, 140 F.3d 815, 817 (9th Cir. 1998); [United
> States v. Schimmels (In re Schimmels)]{.underline}, 85 F.3d 416,
> 420-21 (9th Cir. 1996). An order that does not comply with the
> separate document rule may be held to be not final. Application of the
> separate document rule may be waived. [Boggan v. Hoff Ford, Inc. (In
> re Boggan)]{.underline}, 251 B.R. 95, 98 n.2 (9th Cir. BAP 2000).
> Amended Federal Rule of Civil 58, effective December 1, 2002, now
> makes orders final after 150 days even if not set forth as separate
> judgments.
>
> 3\. Minute Entries / Minute Orders
>
> A minute entry is a final order if it states that it is an order, was
> mailed to counsel, is signed by the clerk who prepared it, and is
> entered on the docket sheet. [Kuan v. Lund (In re Lund)]{.underline},
> 202 B.R. 127, 130 (9th Cir. BAP 1996).
>
> 4\. Leave to Appeal
>
> To appeal an interlocutory order, one must file a notice of appeal
> along with a motion for leave to appeal. FRBP 8001(b). Although filed
> in the bankruptcy court, the leave motion is to the Panel. The Panel
> is the court that grants or denies leave. The motion for leave to
> appeal must contain: (1) a statement of facts necessary to an
> understanding of the questions to be presented by the appeal; (2) a
> statement of the questions to be presented; (3) a statement of the
> reasons why the appeal should be heard; and (4) a copy of the
> judgment, order, or decree complained of and any opinion or memorandum
> relating to that order or judgment. FRBP 8003(a).
>
> Note: depending upon the reason the order is interlocutory, the
> appellant can also seek certification from the bankruptcy judge under
> FRCP 54(b), made applicable by FRBP 7054 and 9021 (through FRCP 58).
> If the bankruptcy court makes an Aexpress determination that there is
> no just reason for delay@ in entry of a final judgment on a particular
> matter, the court can then make an Aexpress direction@ for the entry
> of final judgment on part of an action and the matter is then final
> for purposes of appeal. An order that purports to be a final order on
> fewer than all causes of action or parties will not be considered
> final absent such express determination and direction.
>
> i\. Standard for Granting Leave to Appeal
>
> Leave to appeal is normally limited to situations that would avoid
> wasteful litigation, involve a controlling question of law as to which
> there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, and would
> materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.
> [Roderick v. Levy (In re Roderick Timber Co.)]{.underline}, 185 B.R.
> 601, 604 (9th Cir. BAP 1995); [In re Travers]{.underline} 202 B.R.
> 624, 626 (9th Cir. BAP 1996).
>
> The BAP=s decision to deny leave to appeal is an exercise of
> discretion and generally not reviewable by the Ninth Circuit. [Silver
> Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of
> Desert Hot Springs)]{.underline}, 327 F.3d 930, 938 (9th Cir. 2003).
> [See]{.underline} [Baldwin v. Redwood City]{.underline}, 540 F.2d
> 1360, 1364 (9th Cir. 1976) (holding that the appellant could not
> pursue an interlocutory appeal because it was untimely, but that
> interlocutory order would merge into the final judgment and could be
> challenged upon timely appeal from the final judgment).

**VI. DESIGNATION OF THE RECORD**

F.  Perfection of the Appeal

### Within 10 days after filing the notice of appeal, the appellant must file with the clerk of the bankruptcy court and serve on the appellee a designation of items to be included in the record (ADOR@) on appeal AND must file and serve a Statement of Issues on Appeal (ASOI@). FRBP 8001 & 8006. For appeals pending before the BAP, a DOR is [not]{.underline} a copy of every item to be included in the record. It is a list of the items that make up the record, usually identified by docket number and filing date, as well as a description of the item (e.g. Aplaintiff=s opposition to motion for fees,@ Adeclaration in support of motion to dismiss@).[^6] 

> Within 10 days of service of the appellant=s DOR and SOI, the appellee
> may file a designation of additional items to be included in the
> record. FRBP 8006.
>
> The Panel need not consider items not included in the DOR.
> [See]{.underline} [id.]{.underline} Items that were not before the
> bankruptcy court will not be allowed unless they pertain to mootness
> that arose after the order on appeal.
>
> If the appellee has cross-appealed, it may file an SOI to be presented
> on cross-appeal and a DOR. [Id.]{.underline} Otherwise, appellees do
> not file a SOI, even if they disagree with appellant=s framing of the
> issues. Any such conflict should be addressed in appellee=s brief.
>
> The DOR shall include all transcripts necessary for adequate review in
> light of the standard of review to be applied to the issues before the
> Panel. [See]{.underline} 9th Cir. BAP R. 8006-1. If the record
> includes a transcript, the party designating the transcript must
> immediately deliver to the court reporter a written request for the
> transcript and make arrangements for payment. FRBP 8006.
>
> If a tentative ruling is necessary to understanding the final ruling,
> it must be included in the designation and excerpts of record.
> [Gertsch v. Johnson & Johnson Fin. Corp. (In re Gertsch)]{.underline},
> 237 B.R. 160, 169 (9th Cir. BAP 1999).
>
> The appellant shall serve and file excerpts of the record as an
> appendix when the opening brief is filed. FRBP 8009(b).

G.  Completion of the Record

> When the reporter completes the transcript, the reporter files it with
> the clerk of the bankruptcy court. FRBP 8007(a). The reporter is
> supposed to complete the transcript within 30 days, but may ask the
> clerk for an extension. [Id.]{.underline}

### When the record is complete, the clerk of the bankruptcy court transmits a Certificate of Record or Readiness to Transmit Record to the clerk of the BAP. See FRBP 8007(b); 9th Cir. BAP R. 8007(b)-1. After reviewing the appeal for jurisdiction, the BAP clerk will issue a briefing schedule.

H.  Consequences of Incomplete Record

> The burden of presenting a proper record to the appellate court is on
> the appellant. [Sallie Mae Servicing, L.P. v. Williams (In re
> Williams)]{.underline}, 287 B.R. 787, 791 (9th Cir. BAP 2002); [Kritt
> v. Kritt (In re Kritt)]{.underline}, 190 B.R. 382, 387 (9th Cir. BAP
> 1995. Unless the record before the appellate court affirmatively shows
> the matters on which appellant relies for relief, the appellant may
> not argue those matters on appeal. 10 L. King [Collier on
> Bankruptcy]{.underline} & 8006.03\[1\] (15th ed rev. 2000); [Everett
> v. Perez (In re Perez)]{.underline}, 30 F.3d 1209, 1217 n.12 (9th Cir.
> 1994). The failure to provide an adequate record may result in
> dismissal of the appeal or a waiver of issues dependent upon the
> record. [McCarthy v. Prince (In re McCarthy)]{.underline}, 230 B.R.
> 414, 416 (9th Cir. BAP 1999). When an appellant challenges a factual
> finding, the failure to provide an adequate record may be grounds for
> affirmance. [Friedman v. Sheila Plotsky Brokers, Inc. (In re
> Friedman)]{.underline}, 126 B.R. 63, 68 (9th Cir. BAP 1991).

**VII. MOTIONS**

I.  An area of appellate practice that is familiar to appellate lawyers,
    but not necessarily to trial lawyers and trial judges, is the sheer
    number of motions filed in appellate cases. The BAP receives
    approximately 40 to 50 motions a month. The BAP judges rotate
    sitting on monthly Amotions panels.@ These panels are normally made
    up of three judges, who decide the motions in a collegial manner.
    Some motions that are not case dispositive (e.g., extension of time
    to file briefs) may be decided by fewer judges or by the BAP Clerk,
    based on delegated authority. Typically, the progress of a motion
    is:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
10. Motion is filed with the BAP FRBP 8011(a).

### The motion must state with particularity the grounds for bringing the motion, set forth the relief sought and attach declarations and supporting materials. [Id.]{.underline}

### On a substantive motion, the opposing party has seven days after service to file an opposition. [Id.]{.underline}

> Motions for procedural orders may be acted upon at any time without an
> opportunity to respond. FRBP 8011(b).

11. Motion is immediately reviewed and summarized by one of the staff
    attorneys. Staff attorneys make written analyses and recommendations
    and prepare a proposed form of order.

    The motion, any responses or replies, and the staff attorney=s
    workup are transmitted to the motions panel judges by e-mail or
    overnight delivery.

12. Motions panel judges immediately review the paperwork, and
    communicate their votes and modifications to the proposed order to
    one another and to the staff attorney. Motions will be decided
    without a hearing unless the court orders otherwise. FRBP 8011(c).

13. Once a decision has been voted upon by each of the panel judges, and
    certified by the assigned lead judge, the Clerk will issue the order
    on behalf of the Panel and distribute it to the parties.

> Occasionally, panel judges will split on their vote, which then
> results in a dissent or a separate concurrence relative to that
> motion.
>
> Motions are handled very quickly, so that the oral argument times are
> not delayed. Orders disposing of motions are rarely published expect
> where an important point of law has been resolved (e.g., [T.C.
> Investors v. Joseph (In re M Capital Corp.)]{.underline}, 290 B.R. 743
> (9th Cir. BAP 2003)(burden of proof on party asserting good faith
> seeking protection of 11 U.S.C. \' 363(m) to prove good faith with
> evidence); [Ho v. Dai Hwa Electronics (In re Ho)]{.underline}, 265
> B.R. 603 (9th Cir. BAP 2001) (bankruptcy court retains jurisdiction to
> rule on motion for stay pending appeal after notice of appeal has been
> filed).

14. Rulings by a motions panel are not binding on the merits panel.
    [Gschwend v. Markus (In re Markus)]{.underline}, 268 B.R. 556, 565
    (9th Cir. BAP 2001).

> B. Motion for Stay Pending Appeal
>
> Requests for a stay pending appeal normally should be presented to the
> bankruptcy judge first, FRBP 8005. The bankruptcy court retains
> jurisdiction to rule on a motion for stay pending appeal after a
> notice of appeal has been filed. [Ho]{.underline}, supra.
>
> Parties may file a motion for stay pending appeal directly with the
> appellate court only if they explain why relief was not first obtained
> from the bankruptcy court. FRBP 8005.

### The movant has the burden of showing that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in not granting a stay. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1 (explanatory note) (citing [Wymer v. Wymer (In re Wymer)]{.underline}, 5 B.R. 802, 805-07 (9th Cir. BAP 1980)). A stay pending appeal is in the nature of a preliminary injunction and must satisfy four elements: (1) appellant is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) appellant will suffer irreparable injury if no stay is granted; (3) no substantial harm will come to appellee as a result of a stay; and (4) the stay will not harm the public interest. [Wymer]{.underline}, 5 B.R. at 808.

> The bankruptcy court may require the posting of a bond as a condition
> to granting a stay pending appeal. FRBP 8005. If an appeal is from a
> money judgment in bankruptcy, the supersedeas stay is available as a
> matter of right. The court has discretion in determining the
> sufficiency of the bond and the adequacy of the surety. FRBP 7062(d);
> [Farmer v. Crocker Nat=l Bank (In re Swift Aire Lines,
> Inc.)]{.underline}, 21 B.R. 12, 13-14 (9th Cir. BAP 1982).
>
> C. Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction
>
> Appellants occasionally appeal an issue that the BAP does not have
> jurisdiction to consider for various reasons, including the appellants
> lack standing; the notice of appeal was untimey; or because the appeal
> has become moot. Although jurisdictional issues may be raised by the
> court sua sponte, [see]{.underline} [Vylene Enters., Inc. v. Naugles,
> Inc. (In re Vylene Enters., Inc.)]{.underline}, 968 F.2d 887, 889 (9th
> Cir. 1992), it generally makes sense for an appellee to file a motion
> to dismiss the appeal as early as possible to save the costs of
> briefing in a case that will ultimately be dismissed. Thus, it is
> important to recognize the following concepts of standing and mootness
> in a bankruptcy context.

27052. Lack of Finality

> The BAP has jurisdiction over appeals from only two categories of
> interlocutory order: (1) orders under 11 U.S.C. \' 1121(d) increasing
> or reducing exclusivity time periods, 28 U.S.C. \' 158(a)(2) [Official
> Committee of Unsecured Creditors v.Henry Mayo Newhall
> Memorial]{.underline}([In re Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial
> Hospital]{.underline}), 282 B.R. 444 (9th Cir. BAP 2002)(question of
> whether \"cause\" existed to adjust exclusivity period was mixed
> question of law and fact, that was reviewable de novo); and (2)
> interlocutory orders as to which the BAP grants a motion for leave to
> appeal. 28 U.S.C. \' 158(a)(3). In other words, there is no
> jurisdiction over an interlocutory order (except a \' 1121(d) order)
> until the BAP actually grants leave to appeal.

1.  Standing

> Standing is a jurisdictional issue that is open to review at all
> stages of the litigation. [See]{.underline} [National Org. For Women,
> Inc. v. Scheidler]{.underline}, 510 U.S. 249, 255 (1994). Questions of
> standing are reviewed de novo. [See]{.underline} [Barrus v.
> Sylvania]{.underline}, 55 F.3d 468, 469 (9th Cir. 1995). Because
> standing is a jurisdictional requirement, the BAP must dismiss an
> appeal when no standing exists.
>
> Neither the Bankruptcy Code nor Title 28 lays out the requisites for
> standing on appeal. See 1 [Collier on Bankruptcy]{.underline} & 5.06.
> The Ninth Circuit follows the Aperson aggrieved@ standard for
> standing. [See]{.underline} [Fondiller v. Robertson (In re
> Fondiller)]{.underline}, 707 F.2d 441, 442-43 (9th Cir. 1983) (only
> parties that are pecuniarily affected by a bankruptcy court order or
> judgment have standing to appeal). For a current discussion of various
> standing doctrines see [In re Godon, Inc.]{.underline}, 275 B.R. 555
> (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2002).
>
> The United States Trustee (AUST@) has statutory standing conferred by
> 11 U.S.C. \' 307 to appeal and to intervene in an appeal. [Stanley v.
> McCormack, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth (In re Donovan
> Corp.)]{.underline}, 215 F.3d 929 (9th Cir. 2000).

2.  Mootness

> In addition to the constitutional mootness implicit in the Article III
> Acase@ or Acontroversy@ requirement, two lines of bankruptcy mootness
> cases have developed in the Ninth Circuit. One line focuses on the
> court=s ability to fashion meaningful relief. [In re Baker & Drake,
> Inc]{.underline}., 35 F.3d 1348, 1351-52 (9th Cir, 1994); [In re
> Spirtos]{.underline}, 992 F. 2d 1004 (9th Cir. 1993).
>
> The other applies when an order authorizes the sale of property, and
> implements 11 U.S.C. \' 363(m) premised on the particular need for
> finality of such orders. [Onouli-Kona Land Co. v. Estate of Richards
> (In re Onouli-Kona Land Co.)]{.underline}, 846 F.2d 1170, 1172 (9th
> Cir. 1988) (ABankruptcy=s mootness rule \>developed from the general
> rule that occurrence of events which prevent an appellate court from
> rendering effective relief renders an appeal moot, and the particular
> need for finality in orders regarding stays in bankruptcy.=@); [Arnold
> & Baker Farms v. United States (In re Arnold & Baker
> Farms)]{.underline}, 85 F.3d 1415, 1419 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied,
> 519 U.S. 1054, 117 S. Ct. 681 (1997); [Vista Del Mar Assocs., Inc. v.
> West Coast Land Fund (In re Vista Del Mar Assocs.)]{.underline}, 181
> B.R. 422 (9th Cir. BAP 1995).
>
> Note, however, that the mootness rule operates only when a purchaser
> bought an asset in good faith. Courts generally follow the traditional
> principles that a good faith purchaser is one who buys Ain good faith@
> and for Avalue.@ [In re M. Capital Corp.]{.underline}, 290 B.R. 743,
> 746 (9th Cir. BAP 2003) (emphasizing the need to establish an
> evidentiary record with necessary findings of fact and conclusions of
> law on the good faith issue).
>
> Examples of mootness. The following are common examples of mootness in
> the bankruptcy context: (1) when funds have been disbursed to
> non-parties or when the failure to obtain a stay causes Asuch a
> comprehensive change of circumstances as to make it inequitable to
> consider the merits of the appeal.@ [Beatty v. Traub (In re
> Beatty)]{.underline}, 162 B.R. 853, 856 (9th Cir. BAP 1994); (2) where
> a chapter 11 plan has Abeen so far implemented that it \[would be\]
> impossible to fashion effective relief for all concerned@ and where
> reversal of the order confirming the plan Awould do nothing other than
> create an unmanageable, uncontrollable situation for the Bankruptcy
> Court.@ [Trone v. Roberts Farms, Inc. (In re Roberts Farms,
> Inc.)]{.underline}, 652 F.2d 793, 797 (9th Cir. 1981); (3) where real
> property central to the appeal has been foreclosed upon without
> leaving appellant statutory rights of redemption. [See]{.underline}
> [Onouli-Kona Land Co.]{.underline}, 846 F.2d at 1172-73; (4) sales of
> real property, [Comty. Thrift & Loan v. Suchy (In re
> Suchy)]{.underline}, 786 F.2d 900, 902 (9th Cir. 1986); (5) orders
> involving \' 363(m), which approve a sale or lease of property,
> [Paulman v. Gateway Venture Partners III, L.P. (In re Filtercorp.,
> Inc.)]{.underline}, 163 F.3d 570, 576 (9th Cir. 1998); and (6) sale of
> partnership assets. [Prichard v. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. (In re Kings
> Inn, Ltd.)]{.underline}, 37 B.R. 239, 242-43 (9th Cir. BAP 1984).
>
> D. Emergency Motions

4.  If the motion involves an Aemergency@ that needs expedited action in
    order to avoid irreparable harm, put AEMERGENCY@ in the title. FRBP
    8011(d). Include a cover page bearing the legend AEmergency Motion@
    in large, bold type. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1(a). An original and
    three copies of the motion must be filed with the BAP Clerk
    accompanied by an appendix containing the items specified by 9th
    Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1(c).

> 2\. Always attach a declaration stating the nature of the emergency.
> FRBP 8011(d); 9th Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1(b). The motion should also
> state whether all grounds in support of the motion were submitted to
> the bankruptcy judge and, if not, why the motion should not be
> remanded to the bankruptcy judge for reconsideration. FRBP 8011(d).
>
> 3\. Notify opposing counsel and state in a declaration when and how
> counsel was notified; there is a specific duty on the movant to Amake
> every practicable effort to notify opposing counsel in time for
> counsel to respond to the motion.@ FRBP 8011(d). The motion papers
> must be accompanied by a proof of service showing service on all
> parties. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1(d).
>
> 4\. Include an appendix that contains a conformed copy of the notice
> of appeal and the entered judgment, order or decree from which the
> appeal was taken. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1(b).
>
> 5\. If the emergency motion concerns a stay pending appeal, the
> appendix must contain (1) a conformed copy of the bankruptcy court=s
> order denying or granting the stay and an explanation by the court of
> its ruling, or a declaration explaining why such a copy is
> unavailable, and (2) copies of all papers regarding the stay filed in
> the bankruptcy court. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8011(d)-1(c).
>
> E. Writ of Mandamus
>
> Although it denied a petition for writ of mandamus on the merits in
> [Salter v. Bankruptcy Court]{.underline} ([In re Salter]{.underline})
> 279 B.R. 278 (9th Cir. BAP, 2002), BAP decided a case of first
> impression, concluding that it did have the power to issue such a writ
> because BAP is court \"established by Act of Congress\" which is
> authorized by All Writs Act to issue writs of mandamus.

**VIII. BRIEFING THE ISSUES**

D.  Filing and Formatting

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
28600. After the BAP clerk receives a Certificate of Record from the
       bankruptcy clerk, a briefing schedule is issued. The appellant=s
       opening brief and excerpts of record shall be served and filed
       within 15 days. FRBP 8009(a)(1). Briefs are deemed filed on the
       day of mailing. FRBP 8008(a).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  The appellee=s responsive brief shall be served and filed within 15
    days after service of the appellant=s opening brief. If the appellee
    has filed a cross-appeal, the brief shall contain the issues and
    argument pertinent to the cross-appeal, denominated as such, and the
    response to the appellant=s brief. FRBP 8009(a)(2); 9006(f) (3
    additional days allowed when service is performed by mail).

2.  Reply Briefs. If the appellant desires to file a reply brief, the
    reply brief must be served and filed within 10 days after service of
    the appellee=s brief. If the appellee has cross-appealed, he may
    file and serve a reply brief to the response of the appellant to the
    issues presented in the cross-appeal within 10 days after service of
    the reply brief. FRBP 8009(a)(3); 9006(f) (3 additional days allowed
    when service is performed by mail).

3.  Contents of Briefs. Briefs shall conform to FRBP 8010 and FRAP
    32(a). The appellant=s brief shall contain under appropriate
    headings: (1) a table of contents, table of cases, statutes and
    other authorities, with references to the pages of the brief where
    they are cited; (2) a statement of the basis of appellate
    jurisdiction; (3) a statement of the issues presented and the
    applicable standard of review; (4) a statement of the case; (5) a
    statement of facts with appropriate references to the record; (6) an
    argument; and (7) a short conclusion stating the precise relief
    sought. FRBP 8010(a)(1). The appellee=s brief shall conform to the
    same requirements established for the appellant=s opening brief
    except that a statement of the basis of appellate jurisdiction,
    issues, or the case need not be made. FRBP 8010(a)(2).

4.  Certificates. Appellant=s opening brief must include certifications
    of (1) interested parties, and (2) related cases. Appellee=s
    responsive brief must also include a certification of interested
    parties. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8010(a)-1.

5.  Formatting of Briefs. The BAP requires briefs to be produced by a
    standard typographic printing process with one-inch margins and at
    least 14 point proportional type or 10.5 point monospaced type,
    double-spaced, on opaque, unglazed paper. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8010(a)-1.
    The BAP Rules also require specific information to be included on
    the cover, designate cover colors for the opening and reply briefs
    and require the parties to attach certifications of interested
    parties and related cases to the covers. [Id.]{.underline}

6.  Length of Briefs. Except with leave of the Panel, the appellant=s
    and appellee=s initial briefs shall not exceed 30 pages and reply
    briefs shall not exceed 20 pages, exclusive of pages containing
    table of contents, tables of citations and addendums. 9th Cir.
    BAP R. 8010(c)-1. A motion for leave to file an oversize brief
    should be filed well in advance of the deadline for filing the
    brief. The party requesting the oversize brief should explain the
    need for going over the page limit; for example, if there are
    consolidated appeals or multiple issues.

7.  Reference to Excerpts of Record (Appendix). The briefs must make
    specific references to the relevant portions of the record. FRBP
    8010(a)(1)(D); [see]{.underline} [Dela Rosa v. Scottsdale Mem=l
    Health Sys., Inc.]{.underline}, 136 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir. 1998);
    [Mitchel v. General Elec. Co.]{.underline}, 689 F.2d 877, 878-89
    (9th Cir. 1982). Opposing parties and the court are not obliged to
    search the entire record unaided for error. [Mitchel]{.underline},
    689 F.2d at 879. An affirmance may be premised on the failure of
    appellant to provide an adequate record. [Ashley v. Church (In re
    Ashley)]{.underline}, 903 F.2d 599, 605-06 (9th Cir. 1990). An
    appellate court may dismiss an appeal for failure to provide
    adequate citations to the record to permit review. [See]{.underline}
    [Mitchel]{.underline}, 689 F.2d at 879; [see also]{.underline} [N/S
    Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.]{.underline}, 127 F.3d 1145, 1146
    (9th Cir. 1997) (ABy and large, we have been tolerant of minor
    breaches of one rule or another. Perhaps we are too tolerant
    sometimes. But there are times when our patience runs out. Then we
    strike an appellant=s briefs and dismiss the appeal.@);
    [Perez]{.underline}, 30 F.3d at 1217 n.12 (A\[T\]he parties must
    comply with our rules sufficiently to enable us (and the BAP) to
    examine those materials that bear on their arguments.@).

> The BAP=s imposition of sanctions for non-compliance with
> non-jurisdictional procedural requirements is reviewed by the Ninth
> Circuit under an abuse of discretion standard. [Morrissey v.
> Stuteville (In re Morrissey)]{.underline} 349 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th
> Cir. 2003)(appropriate sanctions may include summary affirmance of the
> bankruptcy court=s decision).

8.  Appendix to Brief (Excerpts of the Record). Appellant must serve and
    file with appellant=s brief Aexcerpts of the record@ as an Appendix
    in all BAP appeals. FRBP 8009(b). Caveat: The requirement of an
    Appendix is separate and distinct from the requirement of preparing
    the record per FRBP 8006-8007. Each BAP judge reviewing the appeal
    receives a copy of the Appendix to Brief, not a copy of the record
    and not a copy of an appendix to an appellate motion.

> i\. Contents. The Appendix must include copies of the following:

a.  complaint and answer or other equivalent pleadings;

b.  any pretrial order;

c.  judgment, order, or decree from which the appeal is taken;

d.  any other orders relevant to the appeal;

e.  the opinion, findings of fact, or conclusions of law filed or
    delivered orally by the court and citations of the opinion if
    published;

f.  any motion or response on which the court rendered decision;

g.  the notice of appeal;

h.  the relevant entries of the bankruptcy docket; and

i.  the transcript or pertinent portion thereof. FRBP 8009(b).

> ii\. The appellee may also serve and file an Appendix that contains
> additional materials omitted by appellant. [Id.]{.underline}
>
> iii\. Form. The BAP has prescribed additional form requirements for
> the Appendix. Among other things, the BAP requires that the Appendix
> be bound separately with white covers, **be continuously paginated**,
> have a table of contents, and have **documents divided by tabs**. 9th
> Cir. BAP R. 8009(b)-1.
>
> iv\. Defective Appendix. The BAP is not obligated to examine portions
> of the record that are not included in the Appendix.
> [Kritt]{.underline}, 190 B.R. at 386-87; [accord]{.underline}, [Bank
> of Honolulu v. Anderson (In re Anderson)]{.underline}, 69 B.R. 105,
> 109 (9th Cir. BAP 1986); [cf.]{.underline} [Ashley v. Church (In re
> Ashley)]{.underline}, 903 F.2d 599, 605-06 (9th Cir. 1990) (incomplete
> transcript in bankruptcy appeal to District Court).
>
> B. Standard of Review
>
> The appellant=s opening brief must state the appropriate standard of
> review for the appeal. FRBP 8010(a)(1). Both sides should be familiar
> with the standard under which the appellate courts will review each
> issue. Findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, FRBP 8013, and
> legal issues are generally reviewed de novo, which means that the
> appellate court looks at the entire record before the bankruptcy court
> and gives no deference to the bankruptcy judge=s legal conclusions.
> Mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de novo. [Murray v.
> Bammer (In re Bammer)]{.underline}, 131 F.3d 788, 792 (9th Cir. BAP
> 1997).
>
> The abuse of discretion standard of review applies to many types of
> bankruptcy court orders. A bankruptcy court necessarily abuses its
> discretion if it bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law or
> clearly erroneous factual findings. [Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx
> Corp.]{.underline}, 496 U.S. 384, 405 (1990). Before reversal is
> proper under the abuse of discretion standard, the Panel must be
> definitely and firmly convinced that the bankruptcy court committed a
> clear error of judgment. [AT&T Universal Card Servs. v. Black (In re
> Black)]{.underline}, 222 B.R. 896, 899 (9th Cir. BAP 1998).
>
> The Panel does not reverse for errors not affecting substantial rights
> of the parties and may affirm for any reason supported by the record.
> 28 U.S.C. \' 2111; FRCP 61, [incorporated by]{.underline} FRBP 9005;
> [Dittman v. California]{.underline}, 191 F.3d 1020, 1027 n.3 (9th Cir.
> 1999); [Polo Bldg. Group v. Rakita (In re Shubov)]{.underline}, 253
> B.R. 540, 547 (9th Cir. BAP 2000).
>
> C. Service
>
> Copies of all papers filed by any party (and not required by these
> rules to be served by the clerk of the BAP) shall, at or before the
> time of filing, be served by the party or a person acting for the
> party on all other parties to the appeal. Service on a party
> represented by counsel shall be made on counsel. FRBP 8008(b).
>
> D. Motions for Extension of Time
>
> 1\. Procedure. If a party seeks to file a brief but is unable to do so
> within the time prescribed by the BAP=s scheduling order, the party
> may move for an extension of time for filing a brief. 9th Cir. BAP R.
> 8009(a)-1. Requests for extensions should be limited to 30 days, and
> 15 days is preferable. A motion for an extension of time for filing a
> brief shall be made within the time limit prescribed by the BAP Rules
> for the filing of such brief and shall be accompanied by a proof of
> service.
>
> 2\. Contents. The motion shall be supported by a declaration stating
> the time when the brief is due, how many extensions of time, if any,
> have been granted, when the brief was first due, and whether any
> previous requests have been denied or denied in part. The motion shall
> also state the reasons why such an extension is necessary and the
> amount of time requested. Finally, the motion shall state the position
> of the opponent(s) in respect to the motion or state why the moving
> party has been unable to obtain a statement of such position(s).
> [Id.]{.underline}
>
> 3\. No Automatic Extensions. The BAP has no obligation to consider a
> late brief and may impose sanctions such as waiver of oral argument,
> monetary sanctions, or dismissal. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8009(a)-1(3).
>
> E. Issues on Appeal
>
> 1\. Generally, appellate courts do not consider arguments Athat are
> not \>properly raise\[d\]= in the trial courts.@ [O=Rourke v. Seaboard
> Sur. Co. (In re Fegert, Inc.)]{.underline}, 887 F.2d 955, 957 (9th
> Cir. 1989). [Concrete Equip. Co., Inc. v. Fox (In re Vigil Bros.
> Constr., Inc.)]{.underline}, 193 B.R. 513, 520 (9th Cir. BAP 1996)
>
> 2\. The Ninth Circuit recognizes three narrow, discretionary
> exceptions to the general rule: (1) to prevent a miscarriage of
> justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process; (2) when
> a change in law raises a new issue while an appeal is pending; and (3)
> when the issue is purely one of law. [Jovanovich v. United
> States]{.underline}, 813 F.2d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir. 1987), citing
> [Bolker v. Commissioner]{.underline}, 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.
> 1985).
>
> 3\. In addition, the BAP must consider matters affecting its
> jurisdiction sua sponte even if not briefed by the parties.
> [See]{.underline} [Vylene Enters., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In re Vylene
> Enters., Inc.)]{.underline}, 968 F.2d 887, 889 (9th Cir. 1992), citing
> [Pizza of Hawaii]{.underline}, 761 F.2d at 1377.
>
> 4\. An appellate court generally will not consider an issue raised by
> an appellant for the first time in a reply brief. [See]{.underline}
> [United States v. Montoya]{.underline}, 45 F.3d 1286, 1300 (9th Cir.
> 1995) (issues not raised and argued in the opening brief are deemed
> waived); [Law Offices of Neil Vincent Wake v. Sedona Inst. (In re
> Sedona Inst.)]{.underline}, 220 B.R. 74, 76 (9th Cir. BAP 1998).
> However, an issue raised by an appellant for the first time in a reply
> brief is not waived if the appellee has briefed the issue.
> [See]{.underline} [United States v. Bohn]{.underline}, 956 F.2d 208,
> 209 (9th Cir. 1992) (AAlthough we ordinarily decline to consider
> arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief, we may consider
> them if \... appellee raised the issue in its brief.@).
>
> F. Developments while Appeal Pending
>
> 1\. Duty of Attorneys. Attorneys have a A\>continuing duty to inform
> the Court of any development which may conceivably affect the outcome=
> of the litigation.@ [Board of License Comm=rs v. Pastore]{.underline},
> 469 U.S. 238, 240 (1985). [See also]{.underline} [Arizonans for
> Official English v. Arizona]{.underline}, 520 U.S. 43, 68 n.23 (1997)
> (AIt is the duty of counsel to bring to the federal tribunal=s
> attention, \>without delay,= facts that may raise a question of
> mootness.@).
>
> 2\. Procedures for Informing the BAP. Although counsel has a duty to
> inform the court of a change in law or facts that may affect the
> appeal, neither FRBP nor BAP Rules address the manner for doing so. It
> is likely that a party may simply provide a case citation with a short
> explanation (and serve it on all parties to the appeal) why the new
> ruling, development, or statute substantively affects the appeal. In
> addition, the BAP has sometimes permitted an appellant to supplement
> the appellate record. [See]{.underline} [Plaintiff=s Class Claimants
> in New Jersey Actions v. Elsinore Corp. (In re Elsinore
> Corp.)]{.underline}, 228 B.R. 731, 733 n.1 (9th Cir. BAP 1998)
> (appellants permitted to supplement appellate record with a district
> court decision decided after the notice of appeal was filed because it
> was helpful in clarifying appellants= claims against the debtor). [But
> see]{.underline} [Morgan v. Safeway Stores, Inc.]{.underline}, 884
> F.2d 1211, 1213 (9th Cir. 1989) (denying motion to supplement record
> with Anewly discovered evidence@ that was not shown to be in fact
> newly discovered and was neither probative, nor added to the record).
>
> 3\. Once the appeal is set for oral argument, it is particularly
> important to advise the BAP if the parties have settled or are in the
> process of settling. If settlement requires approval of the bankruptcy
> court, any motion for continuance should be supported by a declaration
> regarding the status of the settlement discussions and indicating
> whether a hearing on approval has been set before the bankruptcy
> court.
>
> G. Amicus Curiae Briefs
>
> 1\. The BAP accepts amicus briefs on occasion. [E.g.]{.underline},
> [Rancho Bernardo Ltd. P=ship v. First Alliance Corp. (In re First
> Alliance Corp.)]{.underline}, 140 B.R. 531, 532 (9th Cir. BAP 1992);
> [Canadian Commercial Bank v. Hollywood Hotel (In re Hotel
> Hollywood)]{.underline}, 95 B.R. 130 (9th Cir. BAP 1988); [Industrial
> Indem. Co. v. Seattle-First Nat=l Bank (In re North Side Lumber
> Co.)]{.underline}, 83 B.R. 735, 737 (9th Cir. BAP 1987),
> [aff=d]{.underline}, 865 F.2d 264 (9th Cir. 1988).
>
> 2\. Since there is no mention of amicus curiae in the BAP Rules or in
> Part VIII of FRBP, the BAP looks to FRAP 29 and 9th Cir. R. 29-1 for
> the appropriate procedure. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8018(b)-1 (ASilence of
> Local Rules@). Under FRAP 29, an amicus brief may only be filed if
> accompanied by the written consent of all parties, or by leave of
> court granted on motion or at the request of the court (except that
> consent or leave shall not be required when the brief is presented by
> the United States or an officer or agency thereof, or by a State,
> Territory or Commonwealth). FRAP 29.
>
> 3\. The 9th Circuit forbids reply briefs to amicus briefs, disfavors
> multiple amicus briefs raising the same points in support of one
> party, and encourages those who merely wish to join in arguments
> asserted in another brief to file and serve a short letter so stating
> in lieu of a brief. 9th Cir. R. 29-1 (Advisory Committee Note).

**IX. ORAL ARGUMENT**

N.  Scheduling

> Oral argument is scheduled in nearly all fully briefed cases. Upon the
> filing of appellee=s brief, the BAP Clerk will set the appeal for oral
> argument to occur typically 30-45 days after the appellee=s brief was
> filed. Argument is generally scheduled for the third week of the
> month. Counsel should advise the BAP clerk of anticipated schedule
> conflicts in writing not later than the time the appellee=s brief is
> filed. If the Panel determines in accordance with FRBP 8012 that oral
> argument is not needed, it will so order.

A.  Location of Hearing

> The BAP Clerk provides notice of the time and place of argument. The
> BAP can sit at any location in the Ninth Circuit. When economical and
> feasible, the appeal will be set for hearing in the location at which
> the appeal arose. Counsel who desire and agree to a different location
> should inform the BAP Clerk in writing at the earliest possible date
> and not later than the time the appellee=s brief is filed. Once
> scheduled, continuances are granted only under exceptional
> circumstances. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8012-1.

B.  Video and Telephone Conference Hearings

> The BAP does permit counsel to request permission to appear and argue
> by way of video or telephone conference. In addition, in the interest
> of expeditious scheduling of oral argument, the BAP may set an appeal
> for oral argument by video or telephone conference. In such
> circumstance, counsel normally has the option of appearing from the
> remote location or traveling to the site at which the Panel is
> sitting.

C.  BAP Panel Preparation

> The three Panel judges review the briefs and the Appendices to Brief
> before oral argument. In addition, the judge who is designated as the
> Alead@ judge for purposes of writing the final disposition prepares a
> bench memorandum that is circulated to the other judges. The judges
> usually discuss each case prior to oral argument to flesh out the
> issues and survey tentative positions of each judge.

D.  Effective Oral Argument

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
15792. Oral argument is typically limited to fifteen minutes per side.
       Appellants usually reserve five of their fifteen minutes for
       rebuttal. Parties aligned on the same side are asked to divide
       their time.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
9.  Counsel should not attempt to convey every fact and argument in the
    briefs; the BAP judges thoroughly review the briefs and the excerpts
    of record before oral argument. Rather, one should summarize the
    arguments and directly answer judges= questions so as to clarify a
    factual or legal issue or to allay concerns the judges may have.

10. A common mistake at oral argument is to disregard or sidestep a
    judge=s question. That judge=s vote may turn upon the answer. Given
    the limited amount of time available, counsel should make every
    effort to satisfy the judges= concerns before moving on to the
    remainder of the argument; there is no guarantee that there will be
    time later in the argument to get back to the answer.

11. Good appellate advocates are not wedded to their scripts and are
    familiar with every aspect of the case and the arguments of opposing
    counsel, including pertinent facts, legal issues, controlling or
    persuasive case law, and the current procedural posture of the
    bankruptcy case. They are prepared to elaborate on legal or factual
    issues that may not have been emphasized in their briefs, to explore
    a narrow legal issue, or to discuss the ramifications of a published
    decision. They also are not afraid to consume fewer than fifteen
    minutes if there are no questions.

> F. New Matters or Matters Outside of the Briefs
>
> Generally, an appellate court will not consider matters that are not
> specifically and distinctly argued in the appellant=s opening brief.
> [See]{.underline} [United States v. Ullah]{.underline}, 976 F.2d 509,
> 514 (9th Cir. 1992); [see also]{.underline} [Martinez v.
> Ylst]{.underline}, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991)( issue
> raised in reply brief would not be considered, particularly since the
> appellant=s failure to properly brief the issue Aclearly misled the
> appellee@); [Sedona Inst.]{.underline}, 220 B.R. at 76.

**X. SANCTIONS**

> Sanctions for frivolous appeals, in the form of just damages and
> single or double costs, are awarded only upon a separately filed
> motion or after notice from the BAP and reasonable opportunity to
> respond. FRBP 8020. Requests for sanctions in briefs are usually
> ignored and may create the impression that counsel has deficient
> professional knowledge.

**XI. DECISION**

E.  After Oral Argument

> The judges confer (usually right after the hearing) to come to a
> tentative decision. The judge assigned to write the disposition then
> circulates a draft for formal votes. Once all comments have been
> considered by the lead judge, and any concurrences or dissents have
> been prepared, the lead judge transmits the disposition to the BAP
> Clerk, who files it on behalf of the Panel and serves the parties.
> Most BAP appeals are decided within nine months of filing of the
> notice of appeal.

F.  Opinions and Memoranda

> An Aopinion@ is a formal reasoned disposition of the case that is
> intended for publication. [See]{.underline} 9th Cir. BAP R. 8013-1. A
> Amemorandum@ is a written reasoned disposition of a case that is not
> intended for publication and can only be cited for limited purposes.
> [Id.]{.underline} In the 12 months ending September 30, 2003, 27% of
> final BAP decisions were published.

G.  Publication

> The criteria for determining to issue a published opinion are whether
> it: (1) establishes, alters, modifies, or clarifies a rule of law; (2)
> calls attention to a rule of law which appears to have been generally
> overlooked; (3) criticizes existing law; or (4) involves a legal or
> factual issue of unique interest or substantial public importance. 9th
> Cir. BAP R. 8013-1(a).

H.  Request for Publication

> Publication of any unpublished disposition may be requested by letter
> addressed to the Panel clerk, stating concisely the reasons for
> publication. Such a request must be received no later than 30 days
> after the filing of the memorandum. 9th Cir. BAP R. 8013-1(d).

I.  Mandate

> The BAP mandate is a certified copy of the panel=s judgment or final
> order that is sent to the bankruptcy court. It is issued in accordance
> with the time frame set forth in FRAP 41. Copies are not usually sent
> to the parties.

J.  Motions for Rehearing - FRBP 8015

> FRBP 8015 requires motions for rehearing to be filed within ten days
> after entry of the judgment of the BAP. If a timely motion for
> rehearing has been filed, the time for appeal to the court of appeals
> begins to run from the entry of an order disposing of the motion for
> rehearing. See also FRAP 4(a)(4).
>
> Motions for rehearing will delay issuance of the appellate court\'s
> mandate until seven days after the order is entered. FRAP 41.

K.  Appeals to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals - FRAP 6

> A notice of appeal to the court of appeals must be filed within 30
> days after the entry of a final judgment/order of the BAP or district
> court (60 days if the United States or an officer or agency thereof is
> one of the parties.) FRAP 4(a)(1). The notice of appeal is filed with
> the court that issued the ruling, either the BAP or district court. A
> filing fee of \$105 is required, made payable to the AClerk of Court.@
> A timely motion for rehearing under FRBP 8015 tolls the time for
> filing the notice of appeal. [See]{.underline} FRAP 4(a) and FRAP 6.
>
> Unlike the district court and the BAP, the Ninth Circuit Court of
> Appeals does not have discretion to hear interlocutory appeals.
> [See]{.underline} 28 U.S.C. \' 158(d); [Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v.
> City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot
> Springs)]{.underline}, 327 F.3d 930, 933-34 (9th Cir. 2003). The order
> on appeal must be a final order of both the bankruptcy court and the
> district court or BAP. [Alexander v. Compton (In re
> Bonham)]{.underline}, 229 F.3d 750, 761 (9th Cir. 2000). Note:
> Although remand orders are generally interlocutory, in certain
> circumstances they may be considered final. [See]{.underline} [Virtual
> Vision, Inc. v. Praegitzer Indus., Inc. (In re Virtual Vision,
> Inc.)]{.underline}, 124 F.3d 1140, 1143 (9th Cir. 1997); [Vylene
> Enters., Inc. v. Naugles, Inc. (In re Vylene Enters.,
> Inc.)]{.underline}, 968 F.2d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 1992). [See
> also]{.underline} [Scovis v. Henrichsen (In re Scovis)]{.underline},
> 249 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2001).
>
> Requests for stay pending appeal to the Circuit are presented first to
> the BAP, the same way BAP appeal stay requests are initially made to
> the bankruptcy court. FRAP 8(a)(1)(A) (made applicable by FRAP
> 6(b)(1)(C)).

**XII. BAP DECISIONS AS PRECEDENT**

A.  The Ninth Circuit has not determined whether BAP decisions are
    binding in the Acircuit as a whole.@ [Zimmer v. PBS Lending Corp.
    (In re Zimmer)]{.underline}, 313 F.3d 1220, 1225 n. 3 (9th
    Cir. 2002) (noting that the binding nature of BAP decisions is still
    an open issue in the Ninth Circuit); [Bank of Maui v. Estate
    Analysis, Inc.]{.underline}, 904 F.2d 470, 472 (9th Cir. 1990) (BAP
    decisions cannot bind district courts, but declining to decide the
    authoritative effect of a BAP decision).

B.  The BAP has held that its decisions bind all bankruptcy courts in
    the Ninth Circuit. [In re Windmill Farms, Inc.]{.underline}, 70 B.R.
    618, 621 (9th Cir. BAP 1987), [rev=d on other grounds]{.underline},
    841 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir. 1988). However, some bankruptcy courts have
    ruled that BAP decisions do not bind them. [Compare]{.underline}
    [CASC Corp. v. Milner (In re Locke)]{.underline}, 180 B.R. 245, 254
    (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995) (BAP decisions not binding on bankruptcy
    courts), with [Life Ins. Co. of Va. v. Barakat (In re
    Barakat)]{.underline}, 173 B.R. 672, 676-80 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1994)
    (BAP decisions binding on bankruptcy courts), [aff=d on other
    grounds]{.underline}, 99 F.3d 1520 (9th Cir. 1996).

C.  The BAP, for itself, regards the precedents established in prior
    published BAP opinions as binding on itself absent changes in
    statute or controlling Ninth Circuit or Supreme Court precedent.
    [Ball v. Payco-General Am. Credits, Inc. (In re Ball)]{.underline},
    185 B.R. 595, 597 (9th Cir. BAP 1995). Unpublished memoranda are not
    binding on subsequent panels. The BAP has no procedures for en banc
    review of its 3-judge Panel decisions.

D.  As a practical matter, experience teaches that well-reasoned BAP
    opinions are commonly regarded as persuasive by the court of
    appeals, and by district courts and bankruptcy courts within the
    Ninth Circuit,

regardless of whether they are formally binding.

**XIII. INFORMATION AND STATISTICS**

> The BAP has historically dealt with approximately 60% of total Ninth
> Circuit bankruptcy appeals under 28 U.S.C. \' 158(a), the Aopt-out@
> rate of about 40% having been relatively stable through the years.
>
> About one-third of all BAP appeals go through the entire process of
> briefing, oral argument, and decision on the merits. Of the appeals
> that completed that process in the 12 months ending December 31, 2003,
> the median time for disposition of an appeal in which argument was
> allowed was 9.3 months; if an appeal was submitted on briefs, it was
> 8.4 months. The median time from submission to final disposition was
> about 45 days. 151 appeals were disposed on the merits; the reversal
> rate was 25.8%.
>
> During 2003, 208 bankruptcy appeals were filed at the Court of Appeals
> for second level appellate review: 85 from decisions of the Bankruptcy
> Appellate Panel and 123 from decisions of the district courts. Thus,
> for the 443 appeals which proceeded before the Bankruptcy Appellate
> Panel, 81% were fully resolved with only 19% seeking second level
> review.
>
> The BAP=s website (www.ce9.uscourts.gov/bap) includes recently
> published opinions, the BAP=s rules, and other information for
> litigants.

**XIV. CONCLUSION**

> This guide is merely an introduction to the sometimes arcane world of
> bankruptcy appeals. The procedural road map should be of assistance
> but is no substitute for preparation and familiarity with the FRBP and
> the BAP Rules. The main advantage of BAP is that its judges are
> seasoned bankruptcy judges who are expert in bankruptcy law and who
> are dedicated to producing the predictability that is a by-product of
> a uniform body of law based on carefully-reasoned decisions that are
> rendered as promptly as possible.

**APPENDIX I**

**Do=s and Don=ts for an Effective Appeal**

**Do:**

1\. Know your audience. BAP judges generally possess a level of
expertise in bankruptcy matters superior to that of most district court
judges and their law clerks.

2\. Understand the role of the appellate court. While its dominant role
is to assess whether the trial court reached the correct result, the
appellate court is also concerned with the overall impact of its ruling
on the general body of bankruptcy law.

3\. Clarify the standard of review and frame arguments around that
standard.

4\. Simplify the story. Write with punch - short, crisp, essential
facts.

5\. Organize your brief with short headings, rather than long sentence
headings.

6\. Paraphrase quotes whenever possible. Long block quotes are
soporific.

7\. Focus your appellant=s argument on areas where the judge=s ruling is
most susceptible to being reversed.

8\. Provide an adequate record, and know what is in it. Follow the rules
with respect to organizing, paginating and tabbing the record
(appendix), so that the judges and law clerks can find pertinent
excerpts quickly.

9\. Use a conversational tone rather than a formally structured oral
argument. This helps facilitate the transitions that are inevitable when
interrupted with questions from the Panel. Feel free to take less than
your allotted time. Expect the most questions to be asked of the party
with the weakest position, and expect numerous questions about facts and
procedure.

10\. Be honest and direct in answering the panel members= questions.
Acknowledge the weaknesses of your case. Use policy arguments sparingly,
if at all.

11\. Listen to questions asked of your opponent and be ready to fill in
the blanks on matters of concern to the panel.

12\. Know what relief you want (and why).

**Don=t:**

1\. Use many words when a few will do.

2\. Make convoluted arguments.

3\. Make grammatical or typographical errors.

4\. Write in a disorganized and unintelligible manner.

5\. Attack the trial judge or opposing counsel.

6\. Use block quotes extensively.

7\. Overuse policy arguments or \' 105.

8\. Avoid direct answers to the judges= questions.

9\. Deflect the question and distract the judge if it is not the
question you wanted to hear.

10\. Cut off the judge=s question in mid-sentence.

11\. Be ignorant of the record or mischaracterize the record.

12\. Blame your unfamiliarity with the record on the fact that you did
not handle the case at the trial level. (The ASODDI@ excuse - Asome
other dude did it@).

**APPENDIX II**

**Traps for the Unwary**

1\. 10-day appeal period. This is calendar days, not court days. FRBP
9006(a). The period begins to run from [entry]{.underline} of the
judgment or order to be appealed, not notice. Failure to receive notice
or failure of the clerk to serve notice of the entry of the order will
not excuse an untimely notice of appeal. It is the appealing party=s
responsibility to monitor the docket for entry of the order.

2\. A motion to dismiss an appeal as untimely before the expiration of
the time to request an extension under FRBP 8002(c), alerts your
opponent how to save the appeal.

3\. An appeal from an untimely tolling motion under FRBP 8002(b) only
raises the issue of the appropriateness of the order resolving the
tolling motion, not the underlying order. The standard for reversing a
denial of reconsideration is usually much harder than to reverse the
initial decision. Make a timely appeal or motion to extend time to
appeal if your tolling motion is not timely filed.

4\. Statement of Election to have appeal heard by district court -
[Appellant=s]{.underline} election must be filed at the same time as the
Notice of Appeal, in a separate document, not attached to or
incorporated in the body of the Notice of Appeal.

5\. If the order on appeal is not final, appellant must obtain FRCP
54(b) certification from the trial court or move the BAP for leave to
appeal.

6\. Obtain a stay pending appeal if necessary to avoid mootness. Motions
for stay will not ordinarily be considered unless they are first made to
the bankruptcy court or the movant explains why the stay wasn=t obtained
from the bankruptcy court. FRBP 8005. AI didn=t think the bankruptcy
judge would grant my stay@ is not usually a sufficient explanation. It
is usual for a stay to be denied by the BAP, without prejudice, for
failure to bring the motion to the bankruptcy court in the first
instance. If time is of the essence, make sure the stay motion is made
before the correct court. It may head off problems later if at the
beginning of your request for stay directed to the bankruptcy court, you
cite to [Ho v. Dai Hwa Electronics (In re Ho)]{.underline}, 265 B.R. 603
(9th Cir. BAP 2001), to establish that the bankruptcy court retains
jurisdiction to rule on a motion for stay pending appeal, even after a
notice of appeal has been filed.

7\. Understand the standard of review and what hurdles need to be
overcome to obtain a reversal.

8\. Separate judgment rule. Be aware that a separate judgment is usually
required. Your appeal may be delayed until a separate judgment is
entered.

9\. Support your brief with your excerpts of the record. Do not expect
that the panel will look at any supporting documents filed with
intermediate motions. The excerpts of the record need to stand alone as
support for your position. The excerpts may only contain items that are
part of the record on appeal. FRBP 8006. Make sure your excerpts include
the items listed in 8009(b); each item is clearly tabbed; pages are
consecutively numbered.

10\. Ninth Circuit jurisdiction may differ from BAP or district court
jurisdiction. The Circuit has jurisdiction over final orders only. A
district court or BAP decision on an interlocutory appeal is not
reviewable by the Circuit until the matter becomes final at the
bankruptcy court level.

11\. Motions for reconsideration or rehearing after the BAP has rendered
its decision must be made within 10 days. FRBP 8015. A timely motion for
reconsideration or rehearing tolls the time to appeal to the Circuit. An
untimely motion does not. The time to appeal to the Circuit is normally
30 days from the entry of the BAP decision; if the United States is a
party the time is 60 days. FRAP 4 and 6.

12\. Requests for stay pending appeal to the Circuit are made to the
BAP, the same way BAP appeal stay requests are initially made to the
bankruptcy court. FRAP 8(a)(1)(A) (made applicable by FRAP 6(b)(1)(C)).

13\. Requests for sanctions must be made in a separately filed motion.
FRAP 8020.

14\. Appellees, supplement an inadequate record sparingly, as you may be
inadvertently helping appellant. File a motion to dismiss for inadequate
record instead.

**Appendix III**

  -------------- ---- ------- -------------- ------- ----- --------- ------- ------------
                              **NEW                                          
                              BANKRUPTCY                                     
                              APPEAL                                         
                              FILINGS**                                      

                              **Twelve                                       
                              Months Ending                                  
                              December 31,                                   
                              2003**                                         

                                                                             

                                                                             

  **District**                **Bankruptcy                                   **District
                              Appellate                                      Court**
                              Panel**                                        

                                                                             

  **Alaska**                  **1**                        **4**             **5**

                                                                             

  **Arizona**                 **39**                       **38**            **77**

                                                                             

  **C. Cal.**                 **179**                      **132**           **311**

                                                                             

  **E. Cal.**                 **38**                       **43**            **81**

                                                                             

  **N. Cal.**                 **52**                       **47**            **99**

                                                                             

  **S. Cal.**                 **25**                       **26**            **51**

                                                                             

  **Hawaii**                  **4**                        **6**             **10**

                                                                             

  **Idaho**                   **11**                       **9**             **20**

                                                                             

  **Montana**                 **6**                        **6**             **12**

                                                                             

  **Nevada**                  **20**                       **35**            **55**

                                                                             

  **Oregon**                  **10**                       **7**             **17**

                                                                             

  **E. Wash.**                **6**                        **10**            **16**

                                                                             

  **W. Wash.**                **26**                       **38**            **64**

                                                                             

                                                                             

  **TOTALS**                  **417**                      **401**           **818**

                              **51%**                      **49%**           **100%**

                                                                             
  -------------- ---- ------- -------------- ------- ----- --------- ------- ------------

**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY**

**APPELLATE PANEL OF**

**THE NINTH CIRCUIT**

**Effective November 18, 1988; as amended through May 9, 2002**

**AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING**

**THE BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL**

**OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT**

**JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMENDED ORDER CONTINUING THE**

**BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT**

**1. Continuing the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Service.**

**(a) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \' 158(b)(1) as amended by the Bankruptcy
Reform Act of 1994, the judicial council hereby reaffirms and continues
a bankruptcy appellate panel service which shall provide panels to hear
and determine appeals from judgments, orders and decrees entered by
bankruptcy judges from districts within the Ninth Circuit.**

**(b) Panels of the bankruptcy appellate panel service may hear and
determine appeals originating from districts that have authorized such
appeals to be decided by the bankruptcy appellate panel service pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. \' 158(b)(6).**

**(c) All appeals originating from those districts shall be referred to
bankruptcy**

**appellate panels unless a party elects to have the appeal heard by the
district court in the time and manner and form set forth in 28 U.S.C. \'
158(c)(1) and in paragraph 3 below.**

**(d) Bankruptcy appellate panels may hear and determine appeals from
final**

**judgments, orders and decrees entered by bankruptcy judges and, with
leave of bankruptcy appellate panels, appeals from interlocutory orders
and decrees entered by bankruptcy judges.**

**(e) Bankruptcy appellate panels may hear and determine appeals from
final**

**judgments, orders, and decrees entered after the district court from
which the appeal originates has issued an order referring bankruptcy
cases and proceedings to bankruptcy judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. \'
157(a).**

**2. Immediate Reference to Bankruptcy Appellate Panels.**

**Upon filing of the notice of appeal, all appeals are immediately
referred to the**

**bankruptcy appellate panel service.**

**3. Election to District Court - Separate Written Statement Required.**

**A party desiring to transfer the hearing of an appeal from the
bankruptcy appellate panel service to the district court pursuant to 28
U.S.C. \' 158(c)(1) shall timely file a separate written statement of
election expressly stating that the party elects to have the appeal
transferred from the bankruptcy appellate panel service to the district
court.**

**(a) Appellant: If the appellant wishes to make such an election,
appellant must file a separate written statement of election with the
clerk of the bankruptcy court at the time of filing the notice of
appeal. Appellant shall submit the same number of copies of the
statement of election as copies of the notice of appeal. See Bankruptcy
Rule 8001(a). When such an election is made, the clerk of the bankruptcy
court shall forthwith transfer the case to the district court. The clerk
of the bankruptcy court shall give notice to all parties and the clerk
of the bankruptcy appellate panels of the transfer at the same time and
in the same manner as set forth for serving notice of the appeal in
Bankruptcy Rule 8004.**

**(b) All Other Parties: In all appeals where appellant does not file an
election, the clerk of the bankruptcy court shall forthwith transmit a
copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk of the bankruptcy appellate
panels. If any other party wishes to have the appeal heard by the
district court, that party must, within thirty (30) days after service
of the notice of appeal, file with the clerk of the bankruptcy appellate
panels a written statement of election to transfer the appeal to the
district court. Upon receipt of a timely statement of election filed
under this section, the clerk of the bankruptcy appellate panels shall
forthwith transfer the appeal to the appropriate district court and
shall give notice of the transfer to the parties and the clerk of the
bankruptcy court. Any question as to the timeliness of an election shall
be referred by the clerk of the bankruptcy appellate panels to a
bankruptcy appellate panel motions panel for determination.**

**4. MOTIONS DURING ELECTION PERIOD**

**All motions relating to an appeal shall be filed with the bankruptcy
appellate panel service unless the case has been transferred to a
district court. The bankruptcy appellate panels may not dismiss or
render a final disposition of an appeal within thirty (30) days from the
date of service of the notice of appeal, but may otherwise fully
consider and dispose of all motions.**

**5. PANELS**

**Each appeal shall be heard and determined by a panel of three judges
from among those appointed pursuant to paragraph 6, provided however
that a bankruptcy judge shall not participate in an appeal originating
in a district for which the judge is appointed or designated under 28
U.S.C. \' 152.**

**6. MEMBERSHIP OF BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANELS**

**The bankruptcy appellate panel shall consist of seven members serving
seven-year terms (subject to reappointment to one additional three-year
term). The judicial council shall periodically examine the caseload of
the bankruptcy appellate panel service to assess whether the number of
bankruptcy judges serving should change. Appointment of regular and pro
tem bankruptcy judges to service on the bankruptcy appellate panel shall
be governed by regulations promulgated by the Judicial Council.**

**(a) When a three-judge panel cannot be formed from the judges
designated under**

**subparagraph (a) to hear a case because judges have recused
themselves, are disqualified from hearing the case because it arises
from their district, or are otherwise unable to participate, the Chief
Judge of the Ninth Circuit may designate one or more other bankruptcy
judge(s) from the circuit to hear the case.**

**(b) In order to provide assistance with the caseload or calendar
relief, or otherwise to assist the judges serving, or to afford other
bankruptcy judges with the opportunity to serve on the bankruptcy
appellate panels, the Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit may designate
from time to time one or more other bankruptcy judge(s) from the circuit
to participate in one or more panel sittings.**

**7. CHIEF JUDGE**

**The members of the bankruptcy appellate panel service by majority vote
shall select one of their number to serve as chief judge.**

**8. RULES OF PROCEDURE**

**(a) Practice before the bankruptcy appellate panels shall be governed
by Part VIII**

**of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, except as provided in
this order or by rule of the bankruptcy appellate panel service adopted
under subparagraph (b).**

**(b) The bankruptcy appellate panel service may establish rules
governing practice and procedure before bankruptcy appellate panels not
inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. Such rules
shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Judicial Council of the
Ninth Circuit.**

**9. PLACES OF HOLDING COURT.**

**Bankruptcy appellate panels may conduct hearings at such times and
places within the Ninth Circuit as it determines to be appropriate.**

**10. CLERK AND OTHER EMPLOYEES.**

**(a) Clerk=s Office. The members of the bankruptcy appellate panel
service shall select and hire the clerk of the bankruptcy appellate
panel. The clerk of the bankruptcy appellate panel may select and hire
staff attorneys and other necessary staff. The chief judge shall have
appointment authority for the clerk, staff attorneys and other necessary
staff. The members of the bankruptcy appellate panel shall determine the
location of the principal office of the clerk.**

**(b) Law Clerks. Each judge on the bankruptcy appellate panel service
shall have**

**appointment authority to hire an additional law clerk.**

**11. EFFECTIVE DATE**

**This Order shall be effective as to all appeals originating in those
bankruptcy cases that are filed after the effective date of this Order.
For all appeals originating in those bankruptcy cases that were filed
before October 22, 1994, the Judicial Council=s prior Amended Order, as
revised October 15, 1992, shall apply. This Order, insofar as just and
practicable, shall apply to all appeals originating in those bankruptcy
cases that were filed after the effective date of the Bankruptcy Reform
Act of 1994, October 22, 1994, but before the date of this Order.**

**IT IS SO ORDERED.**

**DATE: April 28, 1995; amended May 9, 2002.**

[^1]: This summary is the cumulative work of many current and former BAP
    judges, law clerks and staff dedicated to the common pursuit of
    providing up-to-date materials to the public and bar. These
    materials were first prepared and released on March 15, 1985, by the
    Hon. Sidney C. Volinn, who served as a BAP Judge and Bankruptcy
    Judge from the Western District of Washington. It has been
    frequently updated.

    The analysis contained herein is summary in nature, is not intended
    as legal advice, and is no substitute for legal research. It is the
    responsibility of attorneys and litigants to review and comply with
    applicable laws and rules governing appellate practice and
    procedure.

[^2]: 28 U.S.C. \' 158(a) provides:

    > \(a\) The district courts of the United States shall have
    > jurisdiction to hear appeals
    >
    > \(1\) from final judgments, orders, and decrees;
    >
    > \(2\) from interlocutory orders and decrees issued under section
    > 1121(d) of title 11 increasing or reducing the time periods
    > referred to in section 1121 of such title; and
    >
    > \(3\) with leave of the court, from other interlocutory orders and
    > decrees;
    >
    > of bankruptcy judges entered in cases and proceeding referred to
    > the bankruptcy judges under section 157 of this title. An appeal
    > under this subsection shall be taken only to the district court
    > for the judicial district in which the bankruptcy judge is
    > serving.

[^3]: Currently, the First, Sixth, Eighth and Tenth Circuits also have
    established BAPs. In late December 1999, the Second Circuit
    discontinued its BAP because only a few of the smaller districts in
    that circuit participated (significantly, the Southern District \--
    New York City, did not authorize bankruptcy appeals to the Second
    Circuit BAP). District judges must authorize appeals to BAP from
    their districts (28 U.S.C. \' 158(b)(6)), and all of the districts
    of the Ninth Circuit have granted that authorization.

[^4]: 28 U.S.C. \' 158(b)(5) provides:

    > An appeal to be heard under this subsection shall be heard by
    > panel of 3 members of the bankruptcy appellate panel service,
    > except that a member of such service may not hear an appeal
    > originating in the district for which such member is appointed or
    > designated under section 152 of this title.

[^5]: Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(c) prohibits the bankruptcy court from
    extending the time to appeal orders granting relief from stay;
    authorizing sale or use of property, extensions of credit and use of
    cash collateral; assumption and assignment of executory contracts;
    approval of a Chapter 11 disclosure statement; and confirmation of a
    plan under Chapters 9, 11, 12 and 13.

[^6]: For appeals pending before the district court, litigants should
    check their district=s local rules for requirements regarding the
    DOR.