# FHWA-[Indiana]{.smallcaps}

**Environmental Document**

## General Project Information

  ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
  **Road No./County:**                  

  **Designation Number:**               

  **[Project                            []{#ShortQues .anchor}
  Description/Termini](#ShortInfo):**   
  ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------

## Release for public Involvement

After completing this form, I conclude that this project qualifies for
the following type of Categorical Exclusion and hereby release it for
NEPA public involvement (FHWA must review if Section 4(f) property is
used): ([Explanation](#ReleaseInfo))

+-----------------------------+---+---+---------------------+---+---------+
| Statewide CE (SCE):         | [ |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | ] |   |                     |   |         |
| (Approval requires only     | { |   |                     |   |         |
| INDOT signature)            | # |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | R |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | e |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | l |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | e |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | a |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | s |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | e |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | Q |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | u |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | e |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | s |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | . |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | a |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | n |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | c |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | h |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | o |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | r |   |                     |   |         |
|                             | } |   |                     |   |         |
+-----------------------------+---+---+---------------------+---+---------+
| FHWA CE:                    |   |   |                     |   |         |
|                             |   |   |                     |   |         |
| (Approval requires both     |   |   |                     |   |         |
| INDOT and FHWA signature)   |   |   |                     |   |         |
+-----------------------------+---+---+---------------------+---+---------+
| Environmental Assessment    |   |   |                     |   |         |
| (EA)                        |   |   |                     |   |         |
+-----------------------------+---+---+---------------------+---+---------+
|                             |   |   | Signature           |   | Date    |
|                             |   |   |                     |   |         |
|                             |   |   | (FHWA must sign for |   |         |
|                             |   |   | FHWA EAs.)          |   |         |
+-----------------------------+---+---+---------------------+---+---------+

## Approval

[]{#ApprovalQues .anchor}

INDOT Signature Date FHWA Signature Date

(Required for FHWA CE only. EAs require a separate FONSI)

Note: Do not approve until after Section 106 public involvement and all
other environmental requirements have been satisfied.
([Explanation](#ApprovalInfo))

**Purpose and Need**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **[Existing Conditions](#ExistInfo):**

  []{#ExistQues .anchor}

  **[Need for Improvement](#NeedInfo):**

  []{#NeedQues .anchor}
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

## Alternatives

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **[Proposed improvement](#ProposedInfo):**

  []{#ProposedQues .anchor}

  [**Other alternatives considered**](#AltInfo) **-- Describe Section
  4(f) and Section 404 avoidance alternatives and measures to minimize
  harm.**

  []{#OtherQues .anchor}
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

## Statewide Categorical Exclusion Determination 

Note: If all answers below are "no", then INDOT can approve SCE. For any
answered "yes", explain in the Support Documentation section why
significant impacts will not occur and seek FHWA approval of CE.

  ---------------------------------------------------------- -------- ---------
                                                             **No**   **Yes**

  [**Travel Patterns**](#TravelInfo) **-- Does this project           
  include a bypass or convert a local street into a higher            
  order roadway?** **Will this project have an impact on              
  travel patterns?**                                                  

  [**Relocations**](#Reloinfo) **-- Will the project require          
  more than five (5) relocations (any combination of                  
  residential and/or commercial displacements that total              
  more than five relocations)?**                                      

  [**Historic Resources**](#HistInfo) **-- Has the Section            
  106 consultation resulted in an "adverse effect" finding            
  on any historic property?**                                         

  [**Sections 4(f)**](#FourfInfo) **-- Does the project               
  require the use of any Section 4(f) property?**                     

  **[Air Quality/Land Use](#AirInfo) -- Is (1) the project            
  is a non-attainment or maintenance area, (2) does the               
  current design concept and scope add capacity, and (3) is           
  this current design concept and scope [NOT]{.underline}             
  incorporated in a Conforming MPO 20 year Transportation             
  Plan (TP)?**                                                        

  [**Noise**](#NoiseInfo) -- **Is a noise analysis required           
  for this project?**                                                 

  **[Wetlands](#WetInfo) -- Is an individual Army Corps of            
  Engineers permit required for this project?**                       

  **[Sole Source Aquifers](#SoleInfo) -- Is a detailed                
  groundwater impact assessment required for this project?**          

  **[Threatened and Endangered Species](#TesInfo) -- Has              
  consultation with the USFWS/IDNR resulted in an adverse             
  effect determination on any federally listed or proposed            
  threatened or endangered species or critical habitat?**             
  ---------------------------------------------------------- -------- ---------

##  

## support documentation 

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **[Early Coordination](#EarlyInfo) - List (1) Parties to whom the early
  coordination letter was sent, (2) indicate whether the party responded
  and if so the date of the response, and (3) attach correspondence.**

  []{#EarlyQues .anchor}
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  [[]{#ROWetcQues .anchor}**Right of Way/Land Use/Natural Areas/Nature
  Preserves**](#ROWetcInfo) **-- Provide permanent and temporary
  right-of-way amounts in acres. Break proposed right-of-way amount into
  land use classification and give typical and maximum right-of-way
  widths (existing and proposed). Describe any natural areas and nature
  preserves within the project area.**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

## 

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  [[]{#FloodPlainEtcQues .anchor}**Flood Plain Encroachments/Stream
  Channel/Waterway/Groundwater/Water Table**](#FloodPlainEtcInfo) --
  **Describe any effects the project might have on flood plain, stream
  channel, waterways, groundwater, and the water table. If there are
  homes within the floodplain, within 1000' up and downstream, make a
  note of it here.**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

## 

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **[Relocations](#ReloInfo) -- Describe relocations.**                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#ReloQues .anchor}                                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **[*Historic Resources*](#HistInfo) --Summarize the Section 106       |
| process including any historic and archaeology resources.**           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#HistQues .anchor}                                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#Section4fQues .anchor}**Sections 4(f)**](#Section4fInfo) **-- If |
| Section 4(f) property is being used, indicate which type of Section   |
| 4(f) evaluation applies. Also, in a few paragraphs describe below or  |
| attach (1) a list of 4(f) properties near the project, (2) a          |
| description and list of the 4(f) properties impacted, (3) the views   |
| of official with jurisdiction, and (4) any appropriate photos or plan |
| sheets.**                                                             |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| +                                                                     |
| ------------------+---+------------------+---+------------------+---+ |
| |                                                                     |
|  > **Public       |   | > **Historic     |   | > **Bikeways and |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|  > Parks,         |   | > sites**        |   | > Walkways**     |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|  > Recreation     |   |                  |   |                  |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|  > Lands, and     |   |                  |   |                  |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|  > Wildlife and   |   |                  |   |                  |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|  > Waterfowl      |   |                  |   |                  |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|  > Refuges**      |   |                  |   |                  |   | |
| +                                                                     |
| ------------------+---+------------------+---+------------------+---+ |
| |                                                                     |
|                   |   | > **Historic     |   | > **FULL (DOI &  |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|                   |   | > bridges**      |   | > legal          |   | |
| |                                                                     |
|                   |   |                  |   | > review)**      |   | |
| +                                                                     |
| ------------------+---+------------------+---+------------------+---+ |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#AirQues .anchor}**Air Quality**](#AirInfo) **-- If this is an    |
| added capacity project, include MPO 20-year Transportation Plan (TP)  |
| reference that affirms that this project's design concept and scope   |
| was modeled, if the project adds capacity and is in an air quality    |
| non-attainment or maintenance area.**                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#NoiseQues .anchor}**Noise**](#NoiseInfo) **-- Summarize or       |
| attach noise analysis, including where noise abatement may be         |
| reasonable and feasible.**                                            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **[Wetlands](#WetInfo) -- Describe or attach (1) wetland size and     |
| impacts, (2) functions & values, (3) possible mitigation, and (4) any |
| applicable plan sheets.**                                             |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#WetQues .anchor}                                                  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **[Sole Source Aquifers](#SoleInfo) - Describe or attach (1) plans    |
| showing extent of SSA, (2) communities depending on SSA, and (3)      |
| coordination conducted to date with the USEPA.**                      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#SoleQues .anchor}                                                 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **[Threatened and Endangered Species/Flora and Fauna](#TesInfo) --    |
| Include summary of coordination with USFWS/IDNR.**                    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#TesQues .anchor}                                                  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#AgQues .anchor}**Agriculture**](#AgInfo) **-- Describe or attach |
| (1) amount of prime and non-prime farmland impacted, (2) discuss      |
| farmland conversion impacts, and (3) Farmland Conversion Impact       |
| Rating Sheet (Form AD-1006).**                                        |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#SocioQues .anchor}**Socioeconomic**](#SocioInfo) **-- Describe   |
| or attach temporary and permanent economic and social effects of the  |
| proposed project.**                                                   |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#DetoursTrafficQues .anchor}**Detours/Traffic                     |
| Maintenance**](#DetoursTrafficInfo) **-- Describe any detours used    |
| during construction.**                                                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#Section6fQues .anchor}**Section 6(f)**](#Section6fInfo) **--     |
| Describe any property that may be impacted that was purchased or      |
| improved through the Land and Water Conservation Fund Program. Any    |
| property taken must be replaced.**                                    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#OtherConstrQues .anchor}**Other construction                     |
| projects**](#OtherInfo) **-- Describe other roadway design or         |
| construction projects in the area.**                                  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [**Permits/Mitigation**](#PermitsInfo) **-- Are there any permits     |
| that must be applied for in final design? If so, list them. What are  |
| the current mitigation requirements for this project? Differentiate   |
| between "Firm" and "Optional" commitments.**                          |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#PermitsQues .anchor}                                              |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [**Karst**/**Topography/Geology**](#KarstInfo) **-- Does the Karst    |
| MOA apply? If so, please explain.**                                   |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| []{#KarstQues .anchor}                                                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#HazWasteQues .anchor}**Hazardous Waste**](#HazWasteInfo) **-- Is |
| there any additional evaluations or remediation work that has to be   |
| done regarding hazardous or contaminated material? If so, please      |
| explain.**                                                            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| [[]{#SecCumQues .anchor}**Secondary Impacts/Cumulative                |
| Impacts/Others**](#SecCumInfo) **-- Discuss any reasonably            |
| foreseeable secondary and cumulative impacts from the project. Other  |
| environmental impacts not covered under previous topics should be     |
| included here.**                                                      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **[Public Involvement](#PiInfo) -- Will the opportunity for a public
  hearing be offered?**

  []{#PiQues .anchor}
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

End of Categorical Exclusion End of Categorical Exclusion

## BAckground Information

Hypertext -- By clicking on any underlined text (hypertext), the
preparer of the form is taken to the appropriate section of the
"Background Information" section of the document for more information.
The hypertext in Background Information provides links to appropriate
websites for additional information. To return to where you were in the
form, simply click on the "Return to CE/EA Form" hypertext at the end of
the background information. It is not necessary to include this
background information section when printing the completed CE/EA Form.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#Hyper)

[]{#ShortInfo .anchor}Short Description/Location -- Please enter a short
project description and location that identifies the project. It should
be able to fit on one or two lines. You will be asked for a longer
project description in a later section of the Form. Provide the
structure number (if bridge). This information is linked to the header
of subsequent pages of the CE/EA Form. The header information is
automatically updated when the document is printed. Be sure to check
Update Links on the Print tab in the Options settings (Select Tools,
Options, Print tab, then check Update Links).

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ShortQues)

[]{#ReleaseInfo .anchor}Release for Public Involvement - This form
should be completed as information is made available. For CEs, INDOT may
sign the public involvement release of the CE/EA Form for public
involvement. If any Section 4(f) property is used, then FHWA must review
the CE before it is released for public comment. For EAs, after INDOT is
satisfied the document is satisfactory to be released to the public,
INDOT will forward the document to FHWA for signature to release the
document for the public involvement phase. INDOT will follow their
public involvement policy to solicit feedback from the public.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ReleaseQues)

[]{#ApprovalInfo .anchor}*Approval* -- For Statewide Categorical
Exclusions, after the INDOT Environmental Assessment Section finds the
CE/EA Form acceptable, they will then approve the CE/EA Form. For FHWA
Categorical Exclusions, an FHWA signature is also required. For EAs,
once the public involvement phase is complete and if no significant
impacts are identified, INDOT shall furnish FHWA the final Section 106
documentation, the public hearing transcript, copies of any comments
received and any response, and a request for a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI).

The CE cannot be approved, and a FONSI cannot be signed, until other
environmental requirements have been satisfied, such as Section 106,
Section 7, and Section 4(f). Water related permits, such as Section 404,
Section 401 can be acquired after approval of the CE, or after the
signing of the FONSI, during final design.

INDOT Environmental Assessment Section will then enter into the Activity
Log of Scheduling Production Management System (SPMS) this NEPA
approval. For SCE's, INDOT will indicate that (1) the project is
classified as an SCE and (2) the date the approval was made; e.g.
"Statewide Categorical Exclusion -- January 11, 2027". For CEs approved
by FHWA, INDOT will indicate that (1) the project is classified as an
FHWA approved CE and (2) the date the approval was made by FHWA; e.g.
"FHWA Categorical Exclusion -- January 11, 2027". For EAs, INDOT will
indicate (1) the project was studied as an Environmental Assessment and
(2) the date the FONSI was issued by FHWA; e.g. "Environmental
Assessment -- FONSI -- January 11, 2027".

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ApprovalQues)

[]{#ExistInfo .anchor}*Existing Conditions* -- Describe or attach:

(1) Type of facility.

(2) Existing Traffic.

(3) Roadway and bridge cross-section information -- Existing
    right-of-way widths, number of through lanes, shoulders and their
    widths.

(4) History of improvements (widening, repairs, etc.).

(5) Any areas of environmental concern.

(6) Photographs (when appropriate) to further describe existing
    conditions.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ExistQues)

[]{#NeedInfo .anchor}*Need for Improvement* -- The need for improvement
should describe the underlying problem or deficiency (not the proposed
action), and must be supported by facts and analyses. Therefore,
describe:

(1) Crash data if safety is a problem (compare crash data to Statewide
    average of similar type of roadway)

(2) Traffic data, if congestion is a problem:

    a.  ADT/LOS (for year of study, estimated ready for letting date,
        and 20 years beyond ready for letting date)

    b.  Percent commercial vehicles

(3) Locations where roadway geometry is substandard and feature that is
    substandard

(4) For bridge projects:

    a.  Sufficiency Rating

    b.  Why the bridge is Structurally Deficient and/or Functionally
        Obsolete

    c.  Estimated remaining life (years)

    d.  If there is sufficient remaining life to warrant widening (if
        width is the problem)

[Return to CE/EA Form](#NeedQues)

[]{#ProposedInfo .anchor}*Proposed Improvement* -- The proposed
improvement should completely or largely correct the problems or
deficiencies identified in the "Need for Improvement". Therefore,
describe or attach:

(1) Map of Indiana showing project location.

(2) Local map that shows legible street names, route numbers and project
    termini, etc..

(3) Aerial photography of project location.

(4) Reasons why termini are "logical termini"

(5) Changes in right-of-way width

(6) Changes in number of through lanes, shoulders and their widths.

(7) Added turn lanes

(8) Method of traffic maintenance

(9) Estimated cost, including ROW costs

(10) Estimated letting year

(11) Appropriate sheets from any preliminary design plans that show the
     area affected by the SCE condition(s) not met. Fold the sheets to
     8½x11.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ProposedQues)

[]{#AltInfo .anchor}*Other Alternatives Considered* -- Describe any
other alternatives that were evaluated. Section 4(f) and Section 404
avoidance alternatives and measures to minimize harm [must]{.underline}
be evaluated. Therefore, in a few paragraphs describe or attach:

(1) Any alignment shifts and any design features, such as retaining
    walls or steeper side slopes, which would completely avoid the use
    of the Section 4(f) property or wetland. If project involves a
    historic bridge, then also describe options for rehabilitating the
    bridge.

(2) Why avoiding the property is not "feasible and prudent". May refer
    to issues such as:

    a.  Community or business impacts

    b.  Substantial increase in roadway or structure costs

    c.  Unique engineering, traffic, maintenance, or safety problems

    d.  Difficulties in acquiring permits from various permitting
        agencies

    e.  Avoidance alternatives not meeting the identified transportation
        needs of the project

(3) Mitigation measures to be used to "minimize harm", such as:

    a.  Replacement of lands used

    b.  Replacement of facilities used, ie., sidewalks, lighting, etc

    c.  Restoration and landscaping of disturbed areas

    d.  Special design features

[Return to CE/EA Form](#OtherQues)

[]{#EarlyInfo .anchor}*Early Coordination* -- Early Coordination letters
will be sent to resource agencies and possible consulting parties for
Section 106 (Historic) consultation purposes (see [Historic
Resources](#HistInfo) below). Please refer to the [FHWA-IN Section 106
Consultation Procedures](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/procedur.htm) to
determine how to develop the list of possible consulting parties.

Describe or attach:

(1) Parties to whom the early coordination letter was sent.

(2) Summary of any substantive comments received.

(3) Attach correspondence.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#EarlyQues)

[]{#ROWetcInfo .anchor}*Right of Way/Land Use/Natural Areas/Nature
Preserves* -- Provide right-of-way amounts, both permanent and
temporary, in terms of acres. Break the proposed right-of-way amounts
down into land use classification. Provide the typical and maximum
right-of-way widths (existing and proposed). If any Natural Areas or
Nature Preserves exist within the project area, provide a brief
description of the areas, the ownership of the area, and the use of the
area. Make a note if no natural areas or nature preserves are present
within the project area.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ROWetcQues)

[]{#FloodPlainEtcInfo .anchor}*Flood Plain/Encroachments/Stream
Channel/Waterway/Ground Water/Water Table* -- Describe any effects the
project might have on flood plain, stream channel, waterways,
groundwater, and the water table. If there are homes within the
floodplain, within 1000' up and downstream, make a note of it here.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#FloodPlainEtcQues)

[]{#ReloInfo .anchor}*Relocations* - FHWA regulations regarding CEs
([Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section
771.117](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/23cfr771.htm)) state in Section
117(a) that CEs "do not require the relocation of significant numbers of
people". According to the FHWA-IN CE Procedures, if more than five (5)
relocations are required, the CE must be sent to FHWA for approval.

Describe or attach:

1.  The properties that will be relocated. If available, provide the
    appropriate plan sheets from the preliminary design plans that show
    where the properties are located.

2.  Summarize the relocations in terms of the number of businesses and
    the number of residential relocations.

3.  If more than five (5) relocations are involved, discuss:

    a.  Availability of replacement business or housing locations

    b.  Why this would not be a significant impact

[Return to CE/EA Form](#ReloQues)

[]{#HistInfo .anchor}*Historic Resources* -- [Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation
Act](http://www2.cr.nps.gov/laws/NHPA1966.htm) and the associated
regulations ([36 CFR 800](http://www.achp.gov/regs.html)) published by
the [Advisory Council of Historic Preservation](http://www.achp.gov/)
(ACHP), requires Federal agencies to evaluate the effect federal
undertakings have on cultural resources. [FHWA-IN Section 106
Consultation Procedures](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/procedur.htm)
explain how to implement these regulations for FHWA projects in Indiana.
Additional information regarding Section 106 can be found in the [FHWA
Environmental
Guidebook](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/index.htm).

The FHWA-Indiana Section 106 Consultation Procedures explain how the
Indiana FHWA Division has delegated to INDOT or their consultant, to the
maximum extent possible, Section 106 consultation steps. INDOT or their
consultant is required to develop and propose to FHWA (1) a suggested
"Area of Potential Effect (APE)", (2) suggested properties that are
believed to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places
within the APE, (3) the suggested effect of the project on these
Register-eligible properties, and (4) any mitigation to reduce adverse
effects (if applicable). FHWA will ultimately make a "Finding of Effect"
on all projects that use Federal funds. If Section 106 consultation
results in an "adverse effect" finding, then INDOT must submit the CE to
FHWA for approval.

FHWA-IN has developed guidance for recommending FHWA approval of the
[APE, Eligibility and
Effect](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/finding.htm). The FHWA-IN has also
developed guidance for support documentation that must accompany the
recommendations for effect findings ([No Historic Properties
Affected](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/nhpafndg.htm) and [No Adverse
Effect/Adverse Effect](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/hpafndg.htm)). For
Adverse Effect Findings, FHWA-IN has also developed a [Memorandum of
Agreement template](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/moatempt.htm).

These steps are done in consultation with appropriate "consulting
parties". Certain key groups and individuals will be invited to be a
consulting party through the Early Coordination Letter sent out as one
of the first tasks in the NEPA evaluation. Other individuals and groups
may ask to be a consulting party anytime during the Section 106
consultation process.

The NEPA public involvement opportunity is also used to solicit views
from the public on FHWA's effect finding, and if applicable, the
resolution of adverse effects. Final approval of the CE, or issuance of
a FONSI for EAs, cannot be completed until the public has been provided
the opportunity to comment on the undertakings effect on historic
resources and Section 106 is concluded.

Section 106 and Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966 address similar
resources, but they are completely separate laws. Section 106 requires
federal agencies to evaluate the effect of federal undertakings on
cultural resources and give the ACHP an opportunity to comment on the
undertaking. Section 4(f) applies only activities approved or funded by
the USDOT and any of its agencies. Section 4(f) requires the
consideration of avoidance alternatives to using historic property for
transportation purposes and measures to minimize harm if avoidance is
not feasible or prudent.

Describe or attach:

1.  FHWA approved Area of Potential Effect, Eligibility determinations,
    and Effect finding.

2.  Documentation that supports the effect finding.

3.  If FHWA has made an "Adverse Effect" finding, then provide a copy of
    the fully signed Memorandum of Agreement.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#HistQues)

[]{#Section4fInfo .anchor}*Section 4(f)* -- Section 4(f) of the 1966 DOT
Act ([Title 49, United States Code, Section
303](http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=browse_usc&docid=Cite:+49USC303))
provides special considerations be made regarding the "use" of any
publicly owned park, recreation area, wildlife/waterfowl refuge or
historic property that is either on or eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places. These properties are called "4(f)
Properties". "Use" is defined as a permanent easement, fee taking, or
"constructive use" of a Section 4(f) property. This law applies only to
U.S. Department of Transportation actions.

FHWA regulations regarding Section 4(f) can be found in [Title 23, Code
of Federal Regulations, Section
771.135](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/23cfr771.htm). Additional
information regarding Section 4(f) evaluations can be found in the [FHWA
Environmental
Guidebook](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/index.htm).
Specifically, please refer to (1) [FHWA Technical Advisory
6640.8A](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/nepa/ta6640.htm), dated
October 30, 1987 and titled "Guidance for Preparing and Processing
Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents," and (2) [FHWA Section 4(f)
Policy
Paper](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/vol2/4fpolicy.htm),
dated June 7, 1989 (revised) for more information.

Any use of 4(f) property will require INDOT to submit the CE to FHWA for
approval. INDOT must show that there is no "feasible and prudent"
alternative to the use of the 4(f) property. If there is no feasible and
prudent alternative, then the project must include all possible planning
to minimize harm to the 4(f) property. A section 4(f) evaluation
requires coordination with the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) and
requires FHWA legal council to provide a "Legally Sufficiency"
determination.

Most uses of 4(f) property are so minimal that they may qualify for a
Nationwide Programmatic Section 4(f) evaluation (Programmatic 4(f)). If
the project qualifies for a Programmatic 4(f), then the DOI does not
have to be consulted with and a legal sufficiency is not required. There
are four (4) Nationwide Programmatic 4(f)'s. Attached are the
Programmatic 4(f)'s and a summary of when they apply:

1.  [Public Parks, Recreation Lands, and Wildlife and Waterfowl
    Refuges](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/vol2/doc15g.pdf)
    -- Applicability:

    a.  Improvements only to existing facilities

    b.  Does not impair the use of the Section 4(f) property

    c.  Will not require the taking of more than 10% of each site or 1%
        if site is more than 10 acres

    d.  Official having jurisdiction agrees in writing with assessment
        of effects and mitigation

2.  [Historic
    Sites](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/vol2/doc15e.pdf)
    -- Applicability:

    a.  Improvements only to existing facilities

    b.  Does not impair the use of the Section 4(f) property

    c.  Does not require the removal or alteration of historic objects

    d.  Does not require the disturbance of archaeological resources
        that should be preserved in place

    e.  SHPO agrees in writing with the assessment of effects and
        mitigation.

3.  [Historic
    Bridges](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/vol2/doc15j.pdf)
    -- Applicability:

    a.  Bridge is to be replaced with Federal funds

    b.  Bridge is on or eligible for the National Register of Historic
        Places

    c.  Bridge is not a National Landmark

    d.  A Memorandum of Agreement has been executed between FHWA, SHPO
        and ACHP (if applicable) through the Section 106 process.

4.  [Bikeways or
    Walkways](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/vol2/doc15m.pdf)
    (or any trail project) -- Applicability:

    a.  Independent bikeway/walkway/trail projects, which require the
        use of recreation and park 4(f) properties.

    b.  Does not apply to use of wildlife, waterfowl, or historic 4(f)
        properties.

    c.  Official having jurisdiction agrees in writing with assessment
        of effects and mitigation.

    d.  Does not require use of critical habitat of endangered species.

    e.  Does not apply if project involves any residential or commercial
        displacements.

If Section 4(f) property is being used, then the documentation should
describe the Section 4(f) evaluation that applies and describe
avoidance, minimization and coordination issues. Information that needs
to be provided regarding avoidance and minimization are discussed in the
[Other Alternatives Section](#OtherInfo) above.

In this section indicate which type of Section 4(f) evaluation applies
by selecting the appropriate box on the form, and in a few paragraphs
describe or attach:

1.  Section 4(f) properties near the project.

2.  The Section 4(f) properties in which avoidance is not feasible and
    prudent and will, therefore, result in a fee taking or permanent
    easement.

3.  Any plans and photographs of the 4(f) property that show how the
    property may be affected. Include property lines on these plans.

4.  For Section 4(f) property, correspondence from the official having
    jurisdiction regarding their views with respect to assessment of
    effects and mitigation (SHPO, if historic property).

Any Section 4(f) evaluation (Programmatic or Full) must be approved by
FHWA [before]{.underline} any CE can be approved. Full Section 4(f)
evaluations must [also]{.underline} be reviewed by the DOI and receive a
"Legally Sufficiency" determination from FHWA legal prior to FHWA
approval of the CE or completion of a FONSI.

Section 4(f) and Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act overlap
because they both address historic properties, but they are completely
separate laws. Section 106 involves evaluating the effects of federal
undertakings on cultural resources and providing the ACHP an opportunity
to comment on the undertaking. Section 4(f) requires the consideration
and selection of avoidance alternatives (if they are feasible and
prudent) to using historic property for transportation purposes and
measures to minimize harm if avoidance is not possible.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#Section4fQues)

[]{#AirInfo .anchor}*Air Quality* -- The US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) classifies each county in the United States as
"Attainment", "Non-attainment", or "Maintenance" regarding their
conformance to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Air
pollutants that transportation projects effect are carbon monoxide (CO),
Ozone, or fine particulate matter (PM-10). Currently, the following
counties are classified as either Non-attainment or Maintenance for
ozone (1-hour standard):

-   Clark

-   Floyd

-   Elkhart

-   St. Joseph

-   Lake

-   Porter

-   Marion

-   Vanderburgh

The Clean Air Act of 1990 (CAA) requires the design concept and scope of
projects that could affect air quality (projects that add capacity) to
be included in a "conforming" Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
20-year Transportation Plan (TP). These TP's are modeled for air quality
conformity to the requirements of the CAA and associated State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The FHWA and Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) jointly issue a "conformity finding" after consultation with EPA
and IDEM. Conformity ensures that transportation projects planned will
not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or
delay timely attainment of NAAQS.

Therefore, if the project [is]{.underline} in an MPO planning area that
includes one of the counties classified as Non-Attainment or
Maintenance, and [adds]{.underline} capacity, then the current design
concept and scope (ie., number of lanes, number and location of
intersections and interchanges) of the project must be in an air quality
conforming TP. If the current design concept and scope was not modeled
in this TP, then the CE cannot be approved until TP conformity has been
re-determined by FHWA reflecting the change in scope of the project.

If the project [is]{.underline} in an MPO planning area that includes
one of the counties classified as Non-Attainment or Maintenance, but
[does not]{.underline} add capacity, then this question is not
applicable. If the project [is not]{.underline} in an MPO planning area
that includes one of the counties classified as Non-Attainment
Maintenance, then this question is not applicable.

If this is applicable, then describe or attach:

1.  The specific reference (including document date and page number) to
    the latest approved conforming TP that includes the design concept
    and scope for this proposed project

[Return to CE/EA Form](#AirQues)

[]{#NoiseInfo .anchor}*Noise* -- For certain types of projects, FHWA
noise regulations in [Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section
772](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/23cfr772.htm) require (1) the
identification of locations where noise levels are expected to exceed
certain noise thresholds identified in INDOT's noise policy and (2)
identify all locations that might be eligible for noise abatement, as
defined in the INDOT noise policy, that would substantially reduce noise
levels at the locations approaching or exceeding the noise abatement
criteria.

If the scope of the project includes one of the following, then a noise
analysis is required:

1.  Construction of a highway on new location

2.  Physical alteration of an existing highway which significantly
    changes either the horizontal or vertical alignment

3.  Increases the number of through-traffic lanes. (Note: A project that
    adds an auxiliary lane will also need a noise analysis, if the
    auxiliary Iane is long enough to function as a through-traffic lane
    and/or increase capacity. An auxiliary lane that is added between
    interchanges to improve operational efficiency will also need a
    noise analysis, if the lane is at least 1.5 miles long or if the
    lane is made continuous through a series of successive
    interchanges.)

NEPA approval of a project cannot be made until all "reasonable" and
"feasible" noise abatement measures, which are likely to be incorporated
in the project, have been identified. Feasibility relates to engineering
considerations (e.g., constructability, topography, drainage, ability to
achieve a substantial reduction in noise levels, access requirements for
driveways and ramps, and the presence of local cross streets).
Reasonableness is more subjective and is based on a number of factors,
such as the increase of future noise levels over existing levels, the
cost of noise abatement, and the views of affected residents.

FHWA requires each state to have a FHWA approved noise policy. Refer to
the [INDOT Noise Policy](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/procedur.htm) for
more information. If a noise analysis is required, then FHWA must
approve the CE.

If a noise analysis is required, then summarize or attach:

1.  The noise analysis, including where noise mitigation may be
    reasonable and feasible

[Return to CE/EA Form](#NoiseQues)

[]{#WetInfo .anchor}*Wetlands* -- If an individual Section 404 permit is
required, then the CE must be approved by FHWA.

[EO
11990](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/vol1/doc14u.pdf),
issued on May 24, 1977, requires each Federal agency to develop
procedures for Federal actions whose impact is not significant enough to
require the preparation of an EIS under Section 102(2)(c) of the
National Environmental Policy Act
([NEPA](http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/4321.html)), as amended.
The EO states that each Federal agency "shall avoid undertaking or
providing assistance for new construction located in wetlands unless the
head of the agency [finds]{.underline} (1) that there is no practicable
alternative to such construction, and (2) that the proposed action
includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to wetlands which may
result from such use."

The EO defines 'new construction' to include "draining, dredging,
channelizing, filling, diking, impounding, and related activities". This
EO essentially required a wetland finding for [all]{.underline} federal
undertakings, which had virtually [any]{.underline} impact to a wetland.
DOT Order 5660.1A, issued on August 24, 1978 clarified 'new
construction' by excluding [only]{.underline} "routine repairs and
maintenance of existing facilities".

The DOT Order states, "In carrying out any activities (including small
scale projects which do not require documentation) with a potential
effect on wetlands, operating agencies should consider the following
factors \..." This requires USDOT agencies to [consider]{.underline} the
effects on wetlands for [all]{.underline} projects (including CEs).

Federal-aid applicants will consider these effects during the NEPA
evaluation process and will further consider these effects through the
wetland permitting process and associated meetings with resource
agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), US Environmental Protection
Agency, US Fish & Wildlife Service, & Indiana Department of
Environmental Management). INDOT and FHWA evaluate practicable avoidance
alternatives or options. If avoidance alternatives are not practicable,
then practicable measures to minimize harm are considered and included
in the project.

Therefore, as part of this CE documentation, avoidance and minimization
issues are discussed in the [Other Alternatives Section](#OtherInfo). In
this section, describe or attach for each wetland:

1.  Approximate wetland size.

2.  Area of impact.

3.  Function and value of the wetland.

4.  Any plan sheets that show the location of the wetland.

    The DOT Order requires USDOT agencies to make a formal wetland
    finding for major projects. The Indiana Division makes a formal
    wetland finding for all EAs and EISs. This formal wetland finding
    will be made in the Final EA/Finding of No Significant Impact or
    Final EIS/Record of Decision. In accordance with Executive Order
    11990, and based on the above procedures, the FHWA Indiana Division
    has made a "CE Wetland Finding" and is available on FHWA's website
    (<http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/procedur.htm>). The Wetland Finding
    applies to all CEs that do not require an individual 404 permit.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#WetQues)

[]{#SoleInfo .anchor}*Sole Source Aquifers* -- FHWA environmental
regulations regarding CEs ([Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 771.117](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/23cfr771.htm)) states in
Section 117(a) that CEs are actions that "do not involve significant
air, noise, or water quality impacts". FHWA Indiana Division and INDOT
experience is that the only time there is any potential for significant
impacts to water resources is when the USEPA would require a detailed
groundwater impact assessment. When a detailed groundwater impact
assessment is required, the FHWA must approve the CE.

Sole Source Aquifers are federally regulated areas where groundwater
protection is of the utmost importance, due to the fact that residents
in the area rely upon this water resource as their sole source of
drinking water. These aquifers are Federally designated in order to
provide the USEPA the opportunity to ensure that federal financially
assisted projects will not adversely affect groundwater resources. If a
project is in a designated sole source aquifer area, then a groundwater
screening analysis has to be coordinated with the USEPA
(<http://www.epa.gov/safewater/swp/ssa/reg5.html>). The USEPA must
consult to determine if a detailed groundwater impact assessment is
needed.

If within an area of a SSA, describe or attach:

1.  Summary of the groundwater screening analysis.

2.  Coordination that has been conducted to date with the USEPA.

3.  Summary of the detailed groundwater impacts assessment (if
    applicable).

[Return to CE/EA Form](#SoleQues)

[]{#TesInfo .anchor}*Threatened and Endangered Species* -- Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended ([Title 16
(Conservation), United States Code, Sections 1531 --
1543)](http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/16/1531.html) requires that a
biological evaluation be conducted to determine how any Federally listed
or proposed endangered species or critical habitat may be affected. The
USFWS and IDNR Office of Fish and Wildlife must at least be informally
consulted regarding this evaluation. Ultimately, the USFWS must issue a
written statement stating their opinion detailing if the project would
jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species or results in
the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat. Regulations
that explain the USFWS consultation process can be found at [Title 50
(Wildlife and Fisheries), Code of Federal Regulations, Part 402, Subpart
B](http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/50cfr402_01.html).
Additional information can be found in the [FHWA Environmental
Guidebook](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/index.htm).

If the USFWS opinion is one of the following, then the environmental
analysis with respect to the Endangered Species Act is complete:

1.  Protected species are known to not occur in the project area.

2.  Project would result in "No Effect" to any Federally listed or
    proposed endangered species or critical habitat.

3.  Project is "Not likely to adversely affect" any Federally listed or
    proposed endangered species or critical habitat.

    If the USFWS has made any other opinion, then FHWA must approve the
    CE.

Describe or attach:

1.  A summary of the informal consultation that has been done to date
    with the USFWS and the IDNR, including their "effect" opinion.

2.  If a Biological Assessment was required, a summary of the results.

3.  If Formal Consultation was initiated, a summary of the results.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#TesQues)

[]{#AgInfo .anchor}*Agriculture* -- Note the acreage of prime farmland
to be impacted. If agricultural land will be impacted, but it is not
prime farmland being converted, provide acreage. Discuss farmland
conversion impacts and include "Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Sheet"
(Form AD-1006). If no farmland impacts occur for the project, put "Not
applicable" or "N/A" in this box.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#AgQues)

[]{#SocioInfo .anchor}*Socioeconomic* -- Describe anticipated
socioeconomic effects of the project, if any. If no socioeconomic
impacts are anticipated, put "Not applicable" or "N/A" in this box.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#SocioQues)

[]{#DetoursTrafficInfo .anchor}*Detours/Traffic Maintenance* -- Describe
any detours that will be maintained during construction and the traffic
maintenance issues.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#DetoursTrafficQues)

[]{#Section6fInfo .anchor}*Section 6(f) --* The Land and Water
Conservation Fund Act (LWCF) of 1965 established a grants-in-aid fund to
assist states in the planning, acquisition, and development of outdoor
recreational land and water areas and facilities. Section 6(f) of the
Act prohibits the conversion of any property acquired or developed with
the assistance of the fund to anything other than public outdoor
recreation use without the approval of the Secretary of the Department
of the Interior.

Conversion of land developed with the LWCF will be considered if the
following prerequisites have been met (coordinate with IDNR, Division of
Outdoor Recreation, who is responsible for analyzing each of these
prerequisites):

1.  All practical alternatives to the conversion have been evaluated and
    rejected on a sound basis.

2.  Replacement property of equivalent value, usefulness, and location
    is available.

3.  Established appraisals must be obtained, for fair market value, on
    both the part of the park proposed for conversion and the
    replacement land for the park.

4.  An environmental document must be prepared for both the park land to
    be converted and the replacement land.

5.  The proposed conversion and substitution must be in accordance with
    the state comprehensive outdoor recreation plan.

6.  Coordination with other federal agencies should be completed prior
    to consideration of the proposal by the NPS.

7.  The replacement land must be acquired in accordance with the Federal
    Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
    Act. The substitute site may not be acquired nor the original
    project area converted until after the NPS has approved the
    conversion.

The NPS or IDNR will respond to the early coordination letter and
indicate if the proposed highway project involves acquisition of land
acquired or developed with the LWCF. If the LWCF was used on the parcel
to be acquired by the project, the landowner of the property should, in
cooperation with IDNR-Outdoor Recreation, begin a search for replacement
property. The INDOT-Environmental Assessment Section should also be
contacted for further guidance.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#Section6fQues)

[]{#OtherInfo .anchor}*Other construction Projects --* Make note of any
projects along the corridor or nearby that might cause conflicts or
issues with detour routes. All projects, regardless of who the project
proponent is, should be listed that meet these criteria.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#OtherConstrQues)

> []{#PermitsInfo .anchor}

*Permits/Mitigation* -- List the permits that must be acquired during
final design for this project and explain the current coordination
status with the appropriate resource agency.

Include a summary of all the mitigation for this project to date. Be
sure to phrase the mitigation correctly to indicate whether it is an
action that "will" or "may" be incorporated into the design, depending
on further analysis in final design. For example, if the noise analysis
concluded that some noise barriers are feasible and reasonable, then
list the locations where noise barriers [may]{.underline} be built and
state that final determinations of feasibility and reasonableness will
be made during final design. Include all stipulations in any Section 106
Memorandum of Agreement.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#PermitsQues)

[]{#KarstInfo .anchor}*Karst/Topography/Geology* -- Karst are regions
characterized by the presence of limestone or other soluble rocks, where
drainage has been largely diverted into subterranean routes. Sinkholes,
sinking streams, large springs, and caves dominate the topography of
such areas. On October 13, 1993, the Indiana Department of
Transportation, the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for the purpose of
delineating guidelines for construction of transportation projects in
Karst regions of Indiana. A map delineating potential karst features and
the Memorandum of Understanding governing the treatment of karst
features is available in INDOT's "Procedural Manual for Preparing
Environmental Studies."

[Return to CE/EA Form](#KarstQues)

[]{#HazWasteInfo .anchor}*Hazardous Waste* -- Include location of
permitted and non-regulated hazardous waste sites. If none are within
the project area, put "Not applicable" or "N/A" in this box.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#HazWasteQues)

[]{#SecCumInfo .anchor}*Secondary Impacts/Cumulative Impacts/Others* --
The National Environmental Policy Act requires agencies to also examine
indirect consequences that may occur in areas beyond the immediate
influence of a proposed action and at some time in the future. These
impacts are described as Secondary and Cumulative Impacts. Most often,
these types of impacts are only of concern on projects on new alignment.
Should a project requiring a CE or an EA have a notable or foreseeable
secondary or a cumulative impact on a resource or resources, the impact
should be described in this section. If no secondary or cumulative
impacts are expected, simply place "Not Applicable" or "N/A" in the text
box.

[Return to CE/EA Form](#SecCumQues)

[]{#PiInfo .anchor}*Public Involvement* -- FHWA regulations regarding
CEs ([Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section
771.117](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/23cfr771.htm)) state in Section
117(b)(2) that CEs will not have "Substantial opposition on
environmental grounds". Substantial opposition may be evident from
correspondence on the project, from oral or written comments resulting
from the public notices or meetings, or from public officials. If
substantial opposition occurs, then the project does not qualify for a
SCE and the CE must be submitted to FHWA for approval. Please refer to
[INDOT's Public Involvement
Procedures](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/indiv/procedur.htm), dated July 8,
1987, or the public involvement part of the [FHWA Environmental
Guidebook](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/guidebook/index.htm) for
more information.

Describe or attach:

1.  Summarize the public involvement process, to date, which would
    include:

    a.  When public notices, public meetings, and/or meetings with
        public officials have been held.

    b.  Approximate number from public that attended any public
        meetings.

    c.  Summary of any substantive comments, questions, and concerns
        made by the public at any public meetings or written comments
        received.

2.  If substantial public controversy occurs, explain why they are not
    based on environmental grounds.

3.  INDOT certification indicating that the NEPA public involvement
    requirements have been satisfied.

4.  Transcript of public hearing (if applicable).

[Return to CE/EA Form](#PiQues)

[]{#TravelInfo .anchor}*Travel Patterns* -- FHWA regulations regarding
CEs ([Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section
771.117](http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/23cfr771.htm)) state in Section
117(a) that CEs "do not have a significant impacts on travel patterns".
Based on FHWA-IN and INDOT experience, the only scenario in which a
project could have a major impact on travel patterns is if a substantial
permanent diversion of traffic occurs. This could happen if a:

1.  Bypass is proposed.

2.  Local street is converted to a higher order roadway.

    If any of these scenarios exist, FHWA must approve the CE.

Describe or attach:

1.  If this project will not result in any permanent traffic diversions,
    then no additional documentation is needed.

2.  If permanent traffic diversions will occur then describe why it will
    not result in a "significant impact on travel patterns".

> [Return to CE/EA Form](#PiQues)