**Before the**

**Federal Communications Commission**

**Washington, D.C. 20554**

In the Matter of ) **EB DOCKET NO. 01-61**

)

**LESLIE D. BREWER** ) Acct. No. 200132080023

)

Licensee of Amateur Radio Station and )

General Class Operator License KC4HAZ )

)

Licensee of Station KAE1170 in the )

General Mobile Radio Service )

**[ORDER OF REVOCATION AND OF FORFEITURE]{.underline}**

#  Adopted: June 21, 2001 Released: June 26, 2001

By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

## I. INTRODUCTION

1.  By this Order, we revoke the above-captioned Amateur Radio and
    General Mobile Radio Service ("GMRS") station licenses held by
    Leslie D. Brewer, and impose upon him a forfeiture in the amount of
    \$11,000 for willfully and repeatedly violating Section 301 of the
    Communications Act of 1934, as amended. We conclude, based upon
    evidence of Mr. Brewer's "pirate radio" and other unlawful
    activities, that he lacks the basic character qualifications to be
    and remain a Commission licensee.

**II. BACKGROUND**

2.  By *Order to Show Cause, Notice of Order of Suspension, Notice of
    Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of Apparent Liability for a
    Forfeiture*, FCC 01-74, released March 5, 2001 ("OSC"), the
    Commission designated this case for hearing. The OSC, at ¶ 17,
    specified the following issues:

> \(a\) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or
> repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
> amended, by operating unlicensed (i.e., "pirate") broadcast facilities
> in 1996, 1997, 1999 and/or 2000, and, if so, the effect thereof on his
> basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee.
>
> \(b\) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or
> repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
> amended, by operating an unlicensed Studio-to-Transmitter Link in 1999
> and/or 2000, and, if so, the effect thereof on his basic
> qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee.
>
> \(c\) To determine whether Leslie D. Brewer willfully and/or
> repeatedly violated Sections 2.803(a)(1) and/or 15.201(b) of the
> Commission's rules by marketing and/or selling an unauthorized radio
> frequency device or devices, and, if so, the effect thereof on his
> basic qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee.
>
> \(d\) To determine whether, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant
> to the foregoing issues, Leslie D. Brewer is qualified to be and
> remain a Commission licensee.
>
> \(e\) To determine whether the captioned Amateur radio station license
> and/or General Mobile Radio Service license held by Leslie D. Brewer
> should be revoked.

3.  The OSC, at ¶ 19, also ordered the Presiding Judge, notwithstanding
    the resolution of the foregoing issues, to determine whether an
    Order of Forfeiture should be issued against Mr. Brewer for having
    willfully and/or repeatedly violated Section 301 of the
    Communications Act of 1934, as amended,[^1] on March 11, 2000. The
    OSC set the maximum forfeiture amount at \$11,000.

4.  The OSC, at ¶ 21, ordered Mr. Brewer, pursuant to Section 1.91(c) of
    the Commission\'s rules,[^2] to file a written notice of appearance
    in order to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard. The OSC
    explained that if Mr. Brewer failed to file a timely written notice
    of appearance, his right to a hearing on the matter of his captioned
    station licenses would be deemed waived, and the proceeding
    thereafter would be conducted in accordance with Section 1.92 of the
    Commission\'s rules.

5.  By *Memorandum Opinion and Order*, FCC 01M-11, released May 4, 2001,
    the Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Brewer had received a copy
    of the OSC, but failed to file a written (or any other) notice of
    appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard.
    Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that the hearing was
    waived. The Presiding Judge terminated the proceeding and certified
    the case to the Commission for disposition in accordance with
    Section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules. [^3]

> **III. FINDINGS OF FACT**

6.  The facts contained in the OSC are uncontested. Based on that
    information and other Commission records, we make the following
    specific findings.

7.  Mr. Brewer is the licensee for Amateur radio station and General
    class operator license KC4HAZ. He also is the licensee of Station
    KAE1170 in the General Mobile Radio Service ("GMRS"). Mr. Brewer
    owns an electronics shop in Tampa, Florida, d/b/a L.D. Brewer 2-Way
    Radio. L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio sells and assembles radio equipment.

8.  In response to an anonymous inquiry about a pirate FM station
    broadcasting on 102.1 MHz in the Tampa area, Commission personnel
    monitored the station on January 11, 1996, and traced the unlicensed
    transmissions to Mr. Brewer's residence at 6122 Liberty Avenue,
    Tampa, Florida. On January 12, 1996, Commission personnel warned Mr.
    Brewer that, except when operating certain low power devices, it is
    a violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act[^4] to transmit
    on the FM band without a license.[^5] In a letter directed to Mr.
    Brewer on January 17, 1996, Commission staff repeated its warning
    about unlicensed operations. On January 19, 1996, Mr. Brewer
    responded in writing and stated that "\[a\]ny further operation of
    \[the\] station will be within the guidelines for low-power
    operation, set out in part 15." [^6]

9.  Thereafter, on February 16, 1996, Commission personnel conducted a
    follow-up investigation of Mr. Brewer's transmissions. The
    monitoring revealed that Mr. Brewer was again operating his
    unlicensed FM station. As a result, on April 3, 1996, Commission
    staff issued a Notice of Apparent Liability to Mr. Brewer in the
    amount of \$1,000 for broadcasting without a license, in apparent
    willful violation of Section 301 of the Act.[^7] In response, Mr.
    Brewer challenged, among other things, the accuracy of field
    strength measurements taken of his transmissions and the competency
    of Commission engineers who had conducted the measurements. On June
    19, 1996, Commission staff released a Forfeiture Order. The
    Forfeiture Order rejected Mr. Brewer's claims, concluded that Mr.
    Brewer had engaged in the unauthorized operation of an FM broadcast
    station in violation of Section 301 of the Act, and directed Mr.
    Brewer to forfeit the sum of \$1,000. The Commission subsequently
    denied Mr. Brewer's application for review of the Forfeiture Order.
    [^8]

10. Further monitoring on October 25, 1996, January 31, 1997, May 15,
    1997, and October 14, 1997, revealed that Mr. Brewer continued his
    pirate operations throughout 1996 and into 1997. During this period,
    the Commission received written complaints of interference from
    Paxson Tampa License Limited Partnership ("Paxson"), licensee of
    Station WHPT(FM), 102.5 MHz, Sarasota, Florida. On June 19, 1997,
    the Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, issued a
    letter denying a May 10, 1996, request by Mr. Brewer for Special
    Temporary Authority to operate an FM broadcast station on 102.1 MHz
    in the Tampa area, and returning as unacceptable a November 8, 1996,
    application by Mr. Brewer for a construction permit for a new Class
    A noncommercial educational broadcast station on 102.1 MHz in the
    Tampa area.[^9] Notwithstanding these actions, Mr. Brewer continued
    to operate his FM station without authority. As a consequence, on
    November 19, 1997, Commission personnel, with the assistance of
    Deputies from the U.S. Marshals Service, served and executed an *in
    rem* seizure warrant upon Mr. Brewer and confiscated his FM
    transmission equipment.[^10]

11. For two years following the *in rem* seizure of his FM transmitting
    equipment, Mr. Brewer apparently refrained from engaging in further
    pirate operations. During this time, on September 14, 1998, Mr.
    Brewer filed an application for an experimental FM station with the
    Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology.[^11] The staff
    dismissed the application on September 25, 1998, and returned it to
    Mr. Brewer because it had been filed on an incorrect form.

12. On November 8, 1999, Mr. Brewer again requested Special Temporary
    Authority to operate an FM broadcast station on 102.1 MHz in the
    Tampa area, either as part of the "regular broadcast service" or as
    an "experimental broadcast service." While this request was
    pending,[^12] and on the second anniversary of the *in rem* seizure
    (November 19, 1999), Mr. Brewer resumed his pirate broadcasts on
    102.1 MHz in willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of the
    Act.

13. Based on monitoring conducted on November 19 and 23, 1999,
    Commission personnel confirmed that the source of unlicensed
    transmissions on 102.1 MHz was a warehouse located in a commercial
    shopping mall at the Shady Oaks Plaza, 14920 N. Florida Avenue,
    Tampa, Florida. A tenant list provided by Ross Realty Group, the
    owners of Shady Oaks Plaza, indicated that the warehouse was leased
    to an individual by the name of Karen Walsh. Ross Realty Group
    provided copies of cancelled checks showing that Mr. Brewer had paid
    for the warehouse space leased by Karen Walsh, and from which the
    unlicensed broadcasts were emanating.

14. Subsequently, on December 2, 1999, Commission personnel again
    monitored the unlicensed transmissions from the same warehouse. On
    that same date, Commission personnel confirmed that Mr. Brewer was
    employing an unlicensed studio-to-transmitter link ("STL") on
    950.0925 MHz to send audio programming and/or control signals from
    his residence at 6122 Liberty Avenue, Tampa, Florida, to the
    warehouse, in apparent violation of Section 301 of the Act. Further
    monitoring by Commission personnel on December 3, 10, and 15, 1999,
    confirmed continuing operation of both the unlicensed FM station on
    102.1 MHz from the Shady Oaks Plaza warehouse and the unlicensed STL
    on 950.0925 MHz from Mr. Brewer's Liberty Avenue residence.[^13]

15. Commission staff continued monitoring transmissions on frequency
    102.1 MHz during the early part of the year 2000. On March 11, 2000,
    Commission staff traced transmissions on frequency 950.095 MHz
    radiating from Mr. Brewer's residence located at 6122 East Liberty
    Avenue, Tampa, Florida. Commission staff then monitored
    transmissions on frequency 102.1 MHz and heard programming identical
    to the programming being broadcast on frequency 950.095 MHz.
    Commission staff determined that the transmissions on frequency
    102.1 MHz were radiating from a tower located in the Shady Oaks
    Plaza warehouse on Florida Avenue in Tampa. Measurements taken at
    approximately 250 meters from the warehouse tower by Commission
    staff indicated a field strength of 102,127 microvolts per meter,
    which exceeded the radiation emission limit prescribed by Section
    15.239 of the Commission's rules.[^14] Mr. Brewer did not have
    authority to transmit at that power level or to operate an STL
    facility.

16. In addition to operating pirate FM and STL facilities, Mr. Brewer
    also has engaged in marketing unauthorized FM broadcast transmitting
    equipment, in willful violation of Sections 2.803(a)(1) and
    15.201(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.803(a)(1) and
    15.201(b).[^15] Specifically, in early 1997, it came to the
    Commission's attention that Mr. Brewer, through his business, L.D.
    Brewer 2-Way Radio, was marketing unauthorized radio frequency
    devices. As a result, on July 18, 1997, Commission staff directed a
    warning letter to Mr. Brewer to refrain from such activities. Mr.
    Brewer responded on July 21, 1997, denying he was engaged in any
    unlawful actions.

17. Thereafter, on August 6, 1998, an agent from the Commission's Tampa
    field office, posing as a member of the general public, sent an
    e-mail to L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio requesting information about
    purchasing a 20-watt transmitter that would operate in the FM band.
    Mr. Brewer responded via e-mail with a price and instructions for
    purchasing such equipment. On August 25, 1998, the Tampa field
    office submitted a money order in the amount of \$560.00 for the
    equipment to L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio. Subsequently, on September 28,
    1998, the Tampa field office received a fully assembled 20-watt FM
    broadcast transmitter from L.D. Brewer 2-Way Radio. There was no
    indication that the transmitter was authorized by the Commission,
    and no FCC identifier number was affixed to the equipment. On August
    5, 1999, Commission staff issued a Notice of Apparent Liability
    against Mr. Brewer in the amount of \$10,000 for selling an
    unauthorized radio frequency device, in apparent violation of
    Sections 2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules. The
    Chief, Enforcement Bureau, subsequently rejected the arguments in
    Mr. Brewer's written response and issued a Forfeiture Order in the
    same amount.[^16]

## IV. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

### 

18. Section 301 of the Act provides in pertinent part that no person
    shall operate any apparatus for the transmission of communications
    by radio from one place in any state to another place in the same
    state without a license from this Commission.[^17] The requirement
    for a license in order to broadcast has been upheld by the United
    States Supreme Court as a proper exercise of the constitutional
    power of Congress.[^18]

19. The Commission's Broadcast Character Policy Statement[^19] provides
    that violations of the Communications Act or the Commission's rules
    are matters which are predictive of licensee behavior and directly
    relevant to the Commission's regulatory activities. The Character
    Policy Statement may be used as guidance for Amateur and other
    wireless radio licensees.[^20]

20. Based on the evidence before us, the issues specified in the OSC are
    resolved adversely to Mr. Brewer. As early as January 12, 1996, the
    Commission advised Mr. Brewer to refrain from operating unlicensed
    broadcast facilities. Notwithstanding that warning, Mr. Brewer
    continued to engage in unlawful conduct. The record amply
    demonstrates that Mr. Brewer willfully and repeatedly violated
    Section 301 of the Act by operating unlicensed broadcast facilities
    in 1996, 1997, 1999 and 2000; that Mr. Brewer willfully and
    repeatedly violated Section 301 of the Act by operating an
    unlicensed Studio-to-Transmitter Link in 1999 and 2000; [^21] and
    that Mr. Brewer willfully and repeatedly violated Sections
    2.803(a)(1) and 15.201(b) of the Commission's rules by marketing
    and/or selling an unauthorized radio frequency device or devices.

21. We further find, as a matter of law, that Mr. Brewer is unqualified
    to be and remain a Commission licensee and that the captioned
    Amateur Radio and GMRS licenses held by him should be revoked. Mr.
    Brewer continues to display a cavalier disregard toward his licensee
    obligations, as prescribed by the Act and the Commission's rules,
    notwithstanding clear and repeated notice that his behavior was
    unlawful. Based on Mr. Brewer's flagrant and continuing refusal to
    comply with the Act and Commission rules, we conclude that Mr.
    Brewer cannot be relied upon to carry out the responsibilities of a
    licensee and, hence, does not possess the basic character
    qualifications to hold a Commission authorization. Consequently, we
    will revoke Mr. Brewer's Amateur Radio and GMRS station licenses.
    [^22]

22. As noted above at ¶ 3, the OSC (at ¶ 19) directed that,
    notwithstanding the resolution of the specified issues, it should be
    determined whether a forfeiture order should be issued against Mr.
    Brewer in an amount not to exceed \$11,000 for willfully and/or
    repeatedly violating Section 301 of the Act on March 11, 2000. We
    conclude that a forfeiture order should be issued against Mr.
    Brewer, and that it should be for the maximum amount. The record
    evidence clearly shows that Mr. Brewer engaged in unlicensed
    operations of both an FM broadcast facility and an unlicensed STL on
    March 11, 2000, in willful and repeated violation of Section 301 of
    the Act.

23. Sections 503(b) of the Act and 1.80 of the Commission's rules state
    that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with the
    Act or the Commission's rules shall be liable for a forfeiture
    penalty. For purposes of Section 503(b), the term "willful" means
    that the violator knew that he was taking the action in question,
    irrespective of any intent to violate the Commission's rules.[^23]
    In assessing a forfeiture, we take into account the nature,
    circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation, and, with
    respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of
    prior offenses, ability to pay, and such other matters as justice
    may require.[^24]

24. After considering all the facts and circumstances, including Mr.
    Brewer's long history of misconduct before this agency, we believe
    that a forfeiture in the maximum amount of \$11,000 is appropriate.
    Operating unlicensed radio facilities in deliberate and brazen
    defiance of our rules cannot and will not be tolerated.

**V. ORDERING CLAUSES**

25. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 312 of the
    Communications Act of 1934, as amended,[^25] and Sections 1.92(d)
    and 0.111(a)(14) of the Commission's rules,[^26] that the captioned
    Amateur Radio and GMRS station licenses held by Leslie D. Brewer ARE
    REVOKED, effective on the 40^th^ day after release of this Order,
    unless Mr. Brewer files a petition for reconsideration within 30
    days of release of this Order, in which case the effective date will
    be suspended pending further order of the Commission.

26. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 503(b)(3)(A) of the
    Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.80(f)(4) of
    the Commission's rules,[^27] that Leslie D. Brewer SHALL FORFEIT to
    the United States the sum of eleven thousand dollars (\$11,000) for
    willfully violating Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934,
    as amended.

27. Payment of the forfeiture shall be made in the manner provided for
    in Section 1.80 within 30 days of the release of this Forfeiture
    Order.[^28] If the forfeiture is not paid within the period
    specified, the case may be referred to the Department of Justice for
    collection pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §§ 503(b)(3)(B) and 504(a).

28. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order shall be sent, via
    Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested, to Leslie D. Brewer, 6122
    Liberty Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33617.

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION**

David H. Solomon

Chief, Enforcement Bureau

[^1]: 47 U.S.C. § 301.

[^2]: 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(c).

[^3]: 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(c). Section 1.92(c) provides that when a hearing
    is deemed waived, the Presiding Administrative Law Judge shall
    promptly certify the case to the Commission. Section 1.92(d) of the
    Commission's rules further provides that the Commission will
    thereafter, on the basis of the information before it, determine
    whether an order of revocation should issue. Pursuant to Section
    0.111(a)(14), the Enforcement Bureau has delegated authority to
    "issue or draft appropriate orders after a hearing has been
    terminated by an Administrative Law Judge on the basis of waiver."
    47 C.F.R. § 0.111(a)(14). *See also* 47 C.F.R. § 0.311.

[^4]: 47 U.S.C. § 301. Section 301 of the Act provides in pertinent part
    that no person shall operate any apparatus for the transmission of
    communications by radio from one place in any state to another place
    in the same state without a license from this Commission.

[^5]: The only pertinent exception to the blanket prohibition on
    unlicensed operation is found in Section 15.239(b) of the
    Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.239(b). This rule Section permits
    unlicensed emissions between 88 MHz and 108 MHz, *provided* the
    field strength of such emissions does not exceed 250
    microvolts/meter at 3 meters. At all relevant times, Mr. Brewer's FM
    emissions have exceeded these parameters.

[^6]: Letter, dated January 19, 1996, from L. D. Brewer to Gerardo
    Daubar, Federal Communications Commission, Tampa, Florida.

[^7]:

[^8]: *See* *Leslie D. Brewer*, 12 FCC Rcd 13,490 (1997).

[^9]: The June 19, 1997, letter denied the STA request because it failed
    to satisfy the requirements of Section 15.7(a) of the Commission's
    rules, 47 C.F.R. § 15.7(a), pursuant to which the STA request was
    filed. The June 19, 1997, letter returned Mr. Brewer's application
    as unacceptable for tender, pursuant to Section 73.203(a) of the
    Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.203(a), because it proposed
    operation of a new FM facility on a channel and in a location not
    included in FM Table of Allotments. An application for review of the
    June 19, 1997, actions is pending.

[^10]: The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa
    Division, on February 22, 2000, upheld the validity of the *in rem*
    seizure.

[^11]: File No. 6271-EX-PL-1998.

[^12]: The Commission staff ultimately denied the STA request on June
    30, 2000, on multiple grounds.

[^13]:

[^14]: 47 C.F.R. § 15.239. *See* n. 5.

[^15]: These rule sections collectively prohibit the marketing and/or
    sale of unauthorized transmission equipment.

[^16]: On February 22, 2001, the Deputy Clerk for the United States
    District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, entered
    a default against Mr. Brewer in connection with a consolidated
    action brought by the Department of Justice on behalf of the FCC to
    collect the \$10,000 forfeiture and the earlier \$1,000 forfeiture
    (see para. 7, above) issued against Mr. Brewer. *See* *United States
    v. Leslie D. Brewer*, Entry of Default, Case No. 8:01-cv-59-T-27MAP,
    February 22, 2001.

[^17]: As noted above at n. 5, Section 15.239(b) of the Commission's
    rules permits unlicensed transmissions in the FM broadcast band,
    provided the transmissions are below certain specified field
    strength levels. The record before us indicates that Mr. Brewer's
    transmissions on the FM band have, at all relevant times, exceeded
    these levels and, thus, required a license.

[^18]: *National Broadcasting Co. v. United States*, 319 U.S. 190, 227
    (1943); *see also* *United States v. Dunifer*, 997 F. Supp. 1235,
    1241 (N.D. Cal. 1998).

[^19]: *Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast
    Licensing*, 102 FCC 2d 1179 (1986), on reconsideration, 1 FCC Rcd
    421 (1986*),* appeal dismissed *sub nom. National Association for
    Better Broadcasting v. FCC*, No. 86-1179 (D.C. Cir., June 11, 1987).
    *See* *also Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast
    Licensing*, 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990), on reconsideration, 6 FCC Rcd
    3448 (1991), modified, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992).

[^20]: *See, e.g., Herbert L. Schoenbohm*, 13 FCC Rcd 15,026 (1998)
    (denying renewal of amateur license based on felony conviction and
    lack of candor), *recon. denied* 13 FCC Rcd 23774 (1998), *appeal
    dismissed*, 204 F.3d 234 (D.C. Cir. 2000), *cert. denied*, 121 S.Ct.
    405 (2000).

[^21]: The evidence establishes that Mr. Brewer has operated unlicensed
    broadcast and/or STL facilities on at least the following dates:
    January 11, 1996; February 16, 1996; October 25, 1996; January 31,
    1997; May 15, 1997; October 14, 1997; November 19 and 23, 1997;
    December 3, 10, and 15, 1997; and March 11, 2000.

[^22]: The OCS, at ¶ 16, ordered the suspension of Mr. Brewer's Amateur
    Radio operator license for the remainder of its term, effective 15
    days after Mr. Brewer's receipt of the OCS, unless, within that
    time, Mr. Brewer requested in writing a hearing to challenge the
    suspension. The record reveals that at no time did Mr. Brewer
    request a hearing on the matter of the suspension of his Amateur
    Radio operator license. Accordingly, the suspension of his Amateur
    Radio operator license has already become effective by operation of
    the OCS and the matter of such suspension need not be considered in
    the instant Order.

[^23]: *See* *Jerry Szoka*, 14 FCC Rcd 9857, 9865 (1999) *recon.
    denied*, 14 FCC Rcd 20147 (1999) *petition for review pending sub
    nom. Grid Radio and Jerry Szoka v. FCC*, No. 99-1463 (D.C. Cir.
    November 17, 1999); *Southern California Broadcasting Co.*, 6 FCC
    Rcd 4387 (1991).

[^24]: 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(D). *See also* *The Commission's Forfeiture
    Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to
    Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines*, 12 FCC Rcd 17087, 17100-01
    (1997), *recon. denied*, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999) ("*Forfeiture
    Guidelines*").

[^25]: 47 U.S.C. § 312.

[^26]: 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.92(d), 0.111(a)(14).

[^27]: 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(3)(A), 47 C.F.R. § 1.80(f)(4).

[^28]: 47 C.F.R. § 1.80. Payment may be made by mailing a check or
    similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal
    Communications Commission, to the Forfeiture Collection Section,
    Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482,
    Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. The payment must reference the Acct.
    No. identified above. Requests for full payment under an installment
    plan should be sent to: Chief, Credit and Debt Management Center,
    445 12th Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. *See* 47 C.F.R. §
    1.1914.