BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

TO: OMB Education Desk Officer

SUBJECT: Revision to Currently Approved Collection: OMB No.
1810-0662-v.6

Attached for your review and clearance please find a paperwork package
OMB 1810-0662-v.6. This package is a revision of a currently approved
package (with an expiration date of 3/31/11).

We are submitting this revised package to reflect data burden associated
with several new data collection requirements that will be mandated by
our new final regulations (attached). The package includes a copy of the
proposed National Certificate of Eligibility (COE) and related
instructions for its completion. The package also includes our estimates
of the continued data burden associated with our existing and continuing
regulations.

These new data regulatory requirements require an increased annual data
burden of 511,164 hours -- primarily to reflect the time associated with
collecting, recording and

analyzing data to determine and document the eligibility of children
under the Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program (MEP). . The new
regulations -- in new §200.89 \-- mandate and codify specific
requirements and procedures for accurately determining and documenting
MEP eligibility that were previously voluntary and only in
non-regulatory guidance. As discussed at length in the preamble to the
regulations, it is necessary to issue these regulations and require
these data collection activities to address quality control problems
States have had within the last few years in properly identifying and
documenting the eligibility of migrant children, and to ensure that only
eligible migrant children are served with MEP funds.

Thank you in advance for all your assistance with reviewing and clearing
this package.

If you or your colleagues have any questions/concerns about the
paperwork package, please do not hesitate to contact me at 260-1394 or
at james.english@ed.gov.

Sincerely,

> James English
>
> Program Analyst,
>
> ED/Office of Migrant Education

Attachments
Congressman Goodlatte's Weekly Column: July 16, 2004

*Let's Not Redefine Marriage*

Recent court decisions by activist judges, namely in Massachusetts, and
over-zealous actions by locally elected officials have spurred renewed
attempts to undermine the institution of marriage.

These activist judges, in ordering the state to legitimize same-sex
marriages are attempting to change the very meaning of one of the most
revered and vital foundations of our society in a way that will harm our
culture.

All Americans deserve respect and civility in this debate. At the same
time, the institution of marriage must be protected. For thousands of
years, marriage has been universally recognized by people of different
faiths and cultural traditions for the crucial role it plays in
nurturing families and maintaining a healthy, caring society.

Recent court decisions call into question a state's ability to refuse to
recognize same-sex marriages. As a result, 44 states, far more than the
three-fourths required to approve a constitutional amendment, have
enacted laws that give them the right to decline to recognize same-sex
marriage licenses issued in other states.

In 1996, Congress attempted to address this problem by passing, with my
support, the Defense of Marriage Act. That legislation defined marriage
as the union between a man and a woman, and made clear that no state is
required to accept another state's definition of marriage. This
legislation passed the Congress overwhelmingly, and was signed into law
by President Clinton.

But the judicial onslaught on marriage has shown that current laws on
this matter are insufficient in protecting the institution.

As President Bush remarked, \"If judges insist on forcing their
arbitrary will upon the people...the only alternative left to the people
would be the constitutional process.\" Unfortunately, the Senate last
week failed to garner enough votes to move forward toward final action
on a constitutional amendment to protect the definition of marriage.
Senate leadership has vowed to continue pushing for an amendment, which
I think is the most effective means to protect marriage.

But time is of the essence, which is why the House Judiciary Committee
last week passed, with my support, the Marriage Protection Act, which
will prohibit federal courts from striking down the section of the
Defense of Marriage Act that provides that no state can be required to
recognize the same-sex marriage licenses granted in other states. A vote
on this legislation in the full House of Representatives is expected
soon. Short of a national response, activist judges will simply force
the legal recognition of homosexual unions by rewriting the definition
of marriage.

The prospect of redefining an institution far older than our own
Constitution is of paramount significance. Marriage is the bedrock of
the family, and the family is the cornerstone of our society. We must
continue to pursue public policy which strengthens, not undermines, the
family structure.
> Osteoporosis Prevention (adapted from Zuni-Ramah Service Unit
> Protocol)

a.  From the start of well-woman care to menopause, all women will be
    offered calcium supplementation

    i.  500 -- 1000mg daily (calcium carbonate 1250 mg once or twice a
        day)

b.  At start of menopause, all women will be offered calcium and vitamin
    D supplementation:

    i.  500 -- 1000 mg calcium daily (calcium carbonate 1250mg once or
        twice daily)

    ii. 400 miu vitamin D (one multivitamin)

c.  Age 65 and older women and men will be offered calcium and vitamin D
    supplementation

    i.  500 -- 1000 mg daily calcium

    ii. 400 -- 800 miu vitamin D

> (calcium/vitamin D once or twice daily plus one multivitamin)

d.  Options for supplementation.

    i.  Calcium carbonate 1250 mg contains 500 mg elemental calcium

    ii. Chewable tablets contain 200 --400 mg elemental calcium per tab

    iii. Calcium/Vitamin D contains 500 mg elemental calcium and 200 miu
         Vitamin D

    iv. Multivitamin contains 400 miu Vitamin D
# [Fixed Indirect Cost Rate Calculation using Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990]{.underline}

The Fixed Indirect Cost Rate Calculation is calculated using the most
recent IRS Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax. Most
non-profit organization's publicly available Form 990 is on the Internet
at <http://www.guidestar.org/>. An organization's completed Form 990 is
open to public inspection as required by the Internal Revenue Code. In
order to calculate the fixed indirect cost rate, follow the instructions
below:

1\. Go to page 1 of Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income,
as shown below:

![](media/image1.png){width="1.875in" height="2.675in"}

2\. Refer to Lines (13) Program Services; (14) Management and General;
and

\(15\) Fundraising, as displayed below:

![](media/image2.png){width="5.572222222222222in"
height="0.6770833333333334in"}

  ------------------------------------------------------------ -----------
  Fixed Indirect Cost Rate = Management & General / (Program   
  Services + Fundraising)                                      

                                                               

  Management & General \[Line 14\]                             385,023

                                                               

  Program Services \[Line 13\]                                 2,757,665

  Fundraising \[Line 15\]                                      54,062

  Program Services + Fundraising (MTDC Base\*)                 2,811,727

                                                               

  Management & General / (Program Services + Fundraising) =    
  385,023 / 2,811,727 = 0.13693                                

  Fixed Indirect Cost Rate                                     13.69%
  ------------------------------------------------------------ -----------

**3. Calculate the Fixed Indirect Cost Rate using the information on
Page 1, as follows:**

\* This amount should conform to a modified total direct cost (MTDC)
base. MTDC is defined as total direct costs less stipends, tuition and
related fees, equipment, capital expenditures, and the portion of
subgrants and subcontracts in excess of \$25,000 of each subgrant or
subcontract (regardless of the period covered by the subgrant or
subcontract).
![](media/image1.wmf)

## 

***U.S. Department of Energy***

**News Media Contact s: For Immediate Release**

John Belluardo June 22, 2007

Lauren
Martinez                                                                  

Livermore Site Office Media Hotline: (925) 422-2028

**[NNSA Listens To Livermore Laboratory Employee]{.underline}**

**[Comments on Pension Benefits]{.underline}**

LIVERMORE, CA -- The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) will continue working with the new laboratory
management at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and will listen
to employee concerns and questions regarding the recently announced
pension changes under the new contract.

"Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is of vital importance to our
nation's national security and all of the laboratory's employees are
valued team members," said NNSA's Deputy Administrator for Defense
Programs Thomas P. D'Agostino.

NNSA's Livermore Site Office Manger Camille Yuan-Soo Hoo and the site
office staff are actively engaged in a series of employee meetings
jointly sponsored by the laboratory's new management and NNSA, which
began yesterday.

NNSA is continuing its comprehensive review of the proposed pension
benefit plans for employees at the Livermore laboratory and will make
sure that the pension process is consistent with the process followed at
Los Alamos National Laboratory.

"We are hearing employee concerns about the proposed pension program
changes under the new contract and we will be responsive. We have an
open process to receive questions and comments and we are listening,"
said D'Agostino.

Livermore laboratory employees may send comments to NNSA by emailing
<llnlemployeebenefits@doeal.gov>.

-30-
Dear BLM,

I am very concerned with the direction the Bush Administration is headed
in with the management of nearly 2.6 million acres of federal forests
under the Western Oregon Plan Revisions. The changes that the BLM is
contemplating will unravel the protections of the landmark Northwest
Forest Plan, and will lead to water pollution, degraded habitat, and
increased conflict and controversy.

Your current proposal is unacceptable. The agency proposes to increase
old-growth logging on public lands in western Oregon by 700%, build
1,000 miles of new logging road in the next decade and clearcut at a 9-1
ratio to thinning. This is a myopic and backwards proposal that depletes
our natural resource base for future generations by weakening
protections for forests, creeks and salmon. Shockingly, the proposal
ignores the role that these forests play in regulating the climate.

Most Americans want federal land managers to embrace thinning second
growth forests, safeguard communities from wildfire and protect what
remains of our nation\'s ancient forests. By focusing on previously
logged public forestlands - many of which are now overgrown and in need
of thinning - they are providing wood to local mills while actually
improving conditions for fish and wildlife and keeping saws out of
precious old-growth forests.

In contrast, the WOPR proposes to inflame the controversy by increasing
old-growth clear-cutting for a short-term economic fix. The WOPR puts
water quality at-risk and would destroy some of Oregon\'s most special
places. We should protect our remaining mature and old-growth forests on
public land, not clear-cut these natural treasures as the WOPR proposes
to do. Our old growth forests are irreplacable. Once destroyed by
logging the ecosystem is gone forever.

It is disappointing that at a time when public consensus for old-growth
protection and second-growth thinning has never been stronger, the BLM
is proposing to clear-cut forests older than our nation and turn complex
ecosystems into flammable tree farms.

I live in an area with many wild places around but the old-growth forest
is a rare commodity even today. There are only a few places around where
one can go to feel the true forest. Let\'s not plunder these for a few
dollars, meaningless in the long run, valueless for our children.

Please protect remaining old-growth forests, focus active management of
BLM lands in already logged-over areas, and concentrate job
opportunities in restoration forestry that would benefit watersheds and
generate wood products without multiplying past mistakes.

Sincerely,

Adele Dawson

347 Hemlock

Florence, OR

97439
> **How To Get a ROPS**

**& Seat Belt**

**On Your Tractor**

ROPS stands for Rollover Protective

Structure. It is a proven fact that during

tractor rollovers, ROPS and seat belts save

lives. Most tractors manufactured after

the late 60s can be fitted with a ROPS for

about \$500 to \$700, plus installation and

shipping charges. The businesses listed

want to help you protect yourself and your

family from rollover injuries.

# To get a ROPS & seat belt

***on your tractor just follow***

***these six easy steps!***

> **1.** Write down the make, model, and year of your tractor.
>
> Make \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(company that manufactured)

> Model \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(model name or no.)

> Year \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(year manufactured)

**2.** Find your tractor on the following list.

**3.** Then call the dealer listed for that model.

**4.** When you call, ask the following questions about the type of ROPS
and costs.

> What kind of ROPS do I want or need?

\_\_\_\_ Standard (rigid) **or**

\_\_\_\_ Fold down

-   Cost of ***standard*** ROPS?

ROPS cost = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Shipping costs = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Installation costs = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Total costs = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

-   Cost of fold down ROPS?

-   ROPS cost = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

-   Shipping costs = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

-   Installation costs = \$ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

-   Total costs = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

5\. Ask the dealer about payment options.

Up front payment required?

\_\_\_\_ Yes \_\_\_\_ No

Dealer financing available?

\_\_\_\_ Yes \_\_\_\_ No

If "Yes," interest rate? \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Installment options? \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\-\-\-\--Original Message\-\-\-\--

From: Craig Stephenson
\[[[mailto:cbs520@yahoo.com]{.underline}](mailto:cbs520@yahoo.com)\]

Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:33 PM

To: comments

Subject: Taxation without representation.

It is alarming to know that major adjustments will be considered and
even changed regarding a variety of issues that directly effect the
public, including those of the Gay and Lesbian community without public
discussion. It is very forturnate that I am active at the grassroots
level in discovering detremental changes in policy that will ultimatly
effect my future, and those around me. Otherwise, the propaganda news
stations would only cover what they are supposed to\...the war, the
economy, etc. Civil rights ideas have now been swept under the table for
the time being as the issue of Gay Marriage is debated further.

However, with my recent understanding that the new taxation will deny
same sex, or un-married straight couples, the right to share insurance
because of a fundalmentalist ideaology is absolutly absurd. To deny a
tax exemption for same sex couples who have children is disgraceful and
a selfish and nasty condemnation from the right wing zealots. These
policies only protect the insurance companies from having to make any
liable payouts as a result of sickness. This is an unfair and frankly
un-american approach to reform and should not be set aside or decided
upon without great consideration. Mainly, for all the familes and
couples who reside as law abiding citizens of this country, outside the
domain of a \"traditonal\" family unit.

The more I learn about the history of the United States and the workings
of our government, the less I am deceived by the rhetorical ideaology of
a freedom that this country was started upon. This country is now
divided, Fear and Hate are the two most pressing elements that drive
voting in this country, and money is the root of most political agendas.

I beg that you, the people reading this letter, hear my request and
reconsider the options under reform. Think of the adopted children, who
never had a sense of home or nuturing until their adoptive parents took
them under their guardianship (even if they may happen to be gay). Think
of the unmarried straight couples, who without the desire or need to
have a traditional relationship share medical expenses that can
ultimatly destroy any financial stability. Think of the people who
devote their lives to simply making their lives a livable place, and
then have to give their life to protecting the health of their loved
ones and may loose everything in the process.

This is the reality of reform and it only hurts the public\....not help
it.

Thank you.

Craig Stephenson

\_\_\_\_\_

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Small Business - Try
\<[[http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=31637/\*http:/smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/]{.underline}](http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=31637/*http:/smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/)\>

our new resources site!
![](media/image1.jpeg){width="1.8659722222222221in"
height="2.0819444444444444in"}

courtesy: Wikipedia

**Charles Thomson** ([November
29](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_29),
[1729](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1729) - [August
16](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_16),
[1824](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1824)) born in
[Tobermore](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobermore), a village just
outside [Maghera](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maghera),
[Derry](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derry),
[Ireland](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland) to Scots Irish parents.
His father emigrated from Northern Ireland to the British Colonies in
America (later to become the United States) when Charles was 8 years
old. Upon arrival in America, Charles was orphaned when his father died.
He became a [Philadelphia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia)
[merchant](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchant) and
[politician](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician). He had actively
resisted the British for decades leading up to the [American
Revolutionary
War](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War).

Charles served as the Secretary of the [Continental
Congress](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_Congress) through its
entirety
([1774](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1774)-[1789](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1789)).
Through the 15 years, the Congress saw many delegates come and go.
Thomson\'s dedication to recording the debates and decisions provided
tremendous continuity.

But Thomson\'s service was not without its critics. [James
Searle](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Searle), a close friend of
[John Adams](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams), and a delegate,
began a cane fight on the floor of Congress against Thomson over a claim
that he was misquoted in the \"Minutes\" that resulted in both men being
slashed in the face. Such brawls on the floor were not uncommon, and
many of them were promoted by argument over Thomson\'s recordings.

Thomson is also noted for designing, with [William
Barton](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Barton_(heraldist)), the
[*Great Seal of the United
States*](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Seal_of_the_United_States).
MODELING CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW, [Nabiha S. Shamsi]{.underline}, Brian J.
Sweetman, Andreas A. Linninger\*, University of Illinois at Chicago,
Laboratory for Product and Process Design, Chicago, IL, 60607,
<linninge@uic.edu>

Neurodegenerative diseases are on the rise in an aging population, and
many of these neurodegenerative diseases are associated with
pathological changes to the cerebral blood flow. However, little is
known about blockages, damage to the blood vessels, or other changes
that are associated with abnormal cerebral blood flow. To better
understand the physics of cerebral blood flow we wish to create a first
principle model of cerebral blood flow to calculate flows, pressures,
and vasculature expansion in a mathematical artifact derived from
medical images. Mimics 12.0 was used to create a three dimensional model
of the brain and cerebral vasculature from human computer tomography
(CT) images. This model was then discretized into a series of small
cylindrical tubes, each 0.5 mm in length. A model generator was used to
automatically write the conservation laws for species, mass, and
momentum to calculate all the states of this highly branched and
bifurcating cerebral vasculature artifact that we created. The final
result was a set of nearly one hundred thousand equations for the flows,
pressures, and pressure drops, and these were solved with a step-size
control Newton-Raphson method. Future work includes improving the
software and using the data to analyze the effects of local disturbance
throughout the entire cerebrum. Modeling cerebral blood flow will lead
to a better understanding of brain dynamics in response to changes in
vasculature compliance and tissue stiffness. Additionally, this data can
be used to determine how changes in blood flow patterns affect
cerebrospinal fluid flow and brain systems.

Nabiha S. Shamsi was supported by Supplement to NSF-REU grant No.
CBET-0730040
The federal statutes used in odometer tampering prosecutions include the
federal odometer statute (known as the Truth in Mileage Act) which since
1994 has been codified at [[49 U.S.C. §§
32701-32711]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=49&sec=32701)).

-The odometer tampering prohibition is [[49 U.S.C. §
32703(2)]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/49/subtitles/vi/parts/c/chapters/327/sections/section_32703.html).

> -If a person replaces an odometer, [[49 U.S.C. §
> 32704]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/49/subtitles/vi/parts/c/chapters/327/sections/section_32704.html)
> directs what must then happen.
>
> -False odometer disclosure statements are prohibited by [[49 U.S.C. §
> 32705(a)(2)]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/49/subtitles/vi/parts/c/chapters/327/sections/section_32705.html).
>
> -The regulations referred to in the odometer disclosure statement
> statute are found in [[49 C.F.R. Part
> 580.]{.underline}](http://frwebgate4.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=43432827820+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve)
>
> -The criminal penalty provision is [[49 U.S.C. §
> 32709(b)]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/49/subtitles/vi/parts/c/chapters/327/sections/section_32709.html).

Other statutes commonly used include the federal conspiracy statute,
[[18 U.S.C. §
371]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=371);
the federal mail fraud statute, [[18 U.S.C. §
1341]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=1341);
the statute forbidding the possession of a forged or counterfeit
security (e.g., vehicle title) with intent to deceive, [[18 U.S.C. §
513]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=513);
the statute prohibiting the transportation across state lines of an
altered, forged, or counterfeit security, [[18 U.S.C. §
2314]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=2314);
and money laundering statutes, [[18 U.S.C. §§
1956]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=18&sec=1956)
and
[[1957]{.underline}](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/95/sections/section_1957.html).
**Report No.** **2598** **March 7, 2003**

###  PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ACTION IN RULEMAKING PROCEEDINGS

> Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission\'s
> rulemaking proceedings listed in
>
> this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e).
> The full text of this
>
> document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445
> 12th Street, S.W.,
>
> Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission\'s copy
> contractor, Qualex
>
> International (202) 863-2893. Oppositions to these petitions must be
> filed within 15 days of the
>
> date of public notice of the petitions in the Federal Register. See
> Section 1.4(b)(1) of the
>
> Commission\'s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must
> be filed within 10 days
>
> after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

> **Subject:** In the Matter of the Development of Operational,
> Technical and Spectrum Requirement
>
> for Meeting Federal, State and Local Public Safety Agency
> Communication Requirements Through the Year 2010 (WT Docket No. 96-86)
>
> **Filed By: -** Steve B. Sharkey for Motorola, Inc. on 01/13/03
>
> **Subject:** In the Matter of the Year 2000 Biennial Regulatory
> Review- Amendment of Part 22 of
>
> the Commission's Rules to Modify or Eliminate Outdated Rules Affecting
> the Cellular
>
> Radiotelephone Service and other Commercial Mobile Radio Services (WT
> Docket No.
>
> 01-108)
>
> **Filed By:** -Michael Altschul for Cellular Telecommunications &
> Internet Association on 01/16/03
>
> -Douglas I. Brandon for AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. on 01/16/03
>
> -Ronald L. Ripley for Dobson Communications Corporation on 01/16/03

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

FCC
December 13, 2007

Exemption No. 9572

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-29148

Ms. Marianne Kump

Engineering Manager

Schroth Safety Products Corporation

1371 South West 8^th^ Street, #3

Pompano Beach, FL 33069

Dear Ms. Kump:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for
exemption. It transmits our decision, and explains its basis.

**The Basis for Our Decision**

By letter dated August 30, 2007, you petitioned the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) on behalf of Schroth Safety Products Corporation
(Schroth), for an exemption from § 21.621 of Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow the transfer of
all existing TSO authorizations currently issued to Schroth Safety
Products Corporation to BAE Systems Safety Products Inc.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a
summary of the petition in the [Federal Register]{.underline} because
the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in
acting on this petition would be detrimental to Schroth.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all
material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of
Exemption No. 8031 (copy enclosed), the FAA noted that the intent of
§ 21.621 was to prevent the sale or purchase of production approvals by
preventing the legal transfer of certificate ownership. The rule was not
intended to prevent one company from buying another, or from one company
assuming majority ownership of another. The FAA finds that, similar to
Exemption No. 8031, the petitioner has proposed a change in ownership
that does not violate the intent of § 21.621 and that appropriate
safeguards are in place.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that---

-   they don't differ materially from those presented by the petitioners
    in the enclosed grant of exemption;

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption
    also apply to the situation you present; and

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

**Our Decision**

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the
FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Schroth Safety
Products Corporation an exemption from 14 CFR § 21.621 to the extent
necessary to allow the transfer of all existing TSO authorizations
currently issued to Schroth Safety Products Corporation to BAE Systems
Safety Products Inc.

Sincerely,

/s/

John J. Hickey

Director, Aircraft Certification Services

Enclosure
N023869

March 12, 2008

CLA-2-30:OT:RR:E:NC:N2:238

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 3004.90.9185

Mr. Colm Moynihan

NorthStar Healthcare Limited

3300 Cork Airport Business Park

Kinsale Road

Cork, Ireland

RE: The tariff classification of **Levofloxacin** *(CAS-100986-85-4)*
imported in dosage/tablet form, from India

Dear Mr. Moynihan:

In your letter dated February 26, 2008, you requested a tariff
classification ruling.

The subject product, Levofloxacin is a medicinal preparation containing
Levofloxacin, a 3rd generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic. It is
indicated for the treatment of many different types of bacterial
infections. For tariff purposes, pursuant to exclusion \"(c)\" to
Explanatory Note 29.41, HTS, Levofloxacin hemihydrate is excluded from
classification as an antibiotic within heading 2941, HTS.

The applicable subheading for the Levofloxacin in dosage/tablet form
will be 3004.90.9185, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS), which provides for \"Medicaments \... consisting of mixed or
unmixed products for therapeutic or prophylactic uses, put up in
measured doses \... or in forms or packings for retail sale: Other:
Other: Other: Medicaments primarily affecting the eyes, ears or
respiratory system: Other: Other.\" The rate of duty will be free.

Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change.
The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are
provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/.

This merchandise may be subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act and/or The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which are administered by
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Information on the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as well as The Bioterrorism Act, can be
obtained by calling the FDA at 1-888-463-6332, or by visiting their
website at www.fda.gov.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the
Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact
National Import Specialist Harvey Kuperstein at 646-733-3033.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski

Director,

National Commodity

Specialist Division
September 13, 2002

Item: **MEDISYSTEMS Corp., blood tubing for dialysis, Product code
D3-9694/9793 or K3-9694/9793, BAXTER Product Code 5M9694.**

Specific Incident: See the attached FDA News Release. There are reports
outside the VA healthcare system that this blood tubing may be linked to
deaths and injuries when used with the Meridian model of dialysis
machines manufactured by Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

Action: Check your inventory for the affected products, Medisystems
Product code D3-9694/9793 or K3-9694/9793, Baxter Product code 5M9694.
Contact the manufacturer for alternative blood tubing products so that
you will not compromise needed dialysis treatments. Immediately (within
24 hours) remove affected tubing from service in a manner that does not
compromise the provision of necessary dialysis treatment.

Source: FDA and Baxter Healthcare Corporation.

<http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2002/NEW00835.html>

Contact: For return of blood tubing products and shipment of alternate
blood tubing products contact Baxter, Hospital Order Support (7am-6pm
CST) at 1-888-229-0001, select option 3 and next select option 2.

> For other questions/guidance contact Baxter, Renal Division
> (7:30am-5pm) at 1-888-736-2543 select option 3.
***BLM News***![](media/image1.png){width="1.1826388888888888in"
height="0.9125in"}

NEVADA STATE OFFICE NO. 2005-22

FOR RELEASE: April 14, 2005

CONTACT: Maxine Shane at 775-861-6588 or Debra Kolkman at 775 289-1946

**BUTCH AND JOSIE READY TO GREET VISITORS**

The little lady's name is Josie and the young jack is named Butch. They
both hail from the Blue Wing Herd Management Area in western Pershing
County, about 65 miles northeast of Reno, Nevada. But, their new home is
at the National Wild Horse and Burro Center at Palomino Valley about 20
miles north of Reno-Sparks, Nevada.

Josie and Butch are ready to greet visitors at the Center this summer
with a new set of manners learned from Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
employee Ed Wass. Both Ed and his wife Laura have petted, combed, kissed
and talked to the young equines for about a year now.

Their names are the courtesy of Sierra Allen of Grantsville, Utah, and
Keni Huntington of Battle Mountain, Nevada.

Nine-year old Sierra Allen of Utah liked "Josie" because it "sounds like
an Indian name and I know some Indians live in the West."

"Butch" was submitted by seven-year old Keni Huntington because Butch
Cassidy was supposed to have been in Winnemucca. Perhaps not
coincidentally, the BLM's Winnemucca Field Office is responsible for
managing the Blue Wing area where the young burros were gathered about a
year ago.

Sierra and Keni will receive a set of the *Phantom Stallion* series
written by author Teri Farley, who will also have an opportunity to talk
with the youngsters soon. Joining Mrs. Farley in the telephone
conversation with Sierra and Keni will be John Neill, manager of the
Palomino Center, and Wass. The BLM is also presenting the youngsters
with certificates featuring photos of the burros they named. The initial
presentations of books and plaques will be made to both students later
this month at their schools.

Judges Ginny Freeman of California and Jack Albright of Oklahoma liked
the names Butch and Josie "because they're Old West, good, solid country
names."

**Notes**:

David W. Toll writes that on September 19, 1900, **Butch** Cassidy and
the Hole in the Wall Gang rode into Winnemucca, Nevada, and made First
National Bank President George Nixon open the safe. The robbers galloped
out with \$2,000. The story continues that the gang later sent the bank
a photograph of themselves in suits and derby hats with a mocking thank
you note. However, Toll say most likely Butch Cassidy was not at the
robbery that day, but Harvey Logan and Elzy Lay may have been. The
photograph more likely was sent to Nixon by the Pinkerton Detective
Agency to help identify the robbers.

**Josie** is a short form of the name Josephine, and is probably of
English origin. The name was popular at the turn of the Century. In
fact, Wyatt Earp's third wife was named Josephine Sarah, and was called
either "Josie" or "Sadie." A 1902 photo of Josie shows her atop a horse
in front of Wyatt's Northern saloon in Tonopah, Nevada.

-30-
# Critical Elements for ***Library Technician - 1411***

### Library maintenance and upkeep

> Responsible for general library maintenance and upkeep, including
> shelving, shifting, collection inventory/loss control, filing,
> checking in and claiming lost journals; preparing journal and book
> orders, supplies, and other acquisitions via credit card and/or RPA
> requests; preparation of holdings, serials, reprints, and other
> lists/correspondence; and generating and compiling statistics and
> reports regarding library usage .

-   Shelving, filing, and journal check in are done daily.

-   General ordering/maintenance issues handled as they occur
    and normally processed within one day of need;

-   Journal orders are prepared monthly and all returned items from the
    bindery are back on the library shelves within one week of receipt;

-   Preparation of holdings, serials, and other lists done weekly or
    monthly, depending on requirements.

-   Any unusual issues or scenarios are brought to the supervisor\'s
    attention immediately. 

### Data Entry

> Responsible for data entry including online catalog cards, forms,
> memos, etc. Preparation of yearly inventory of overdue and/or missing
> materials. Weeds collection per supervisor\'s recommendations and
> updates data per such changes. 

-   Data entry is done daily as needed.

-   Begins yearly inventory by October 1 of each year and completed by
    December 1 of each year.

-   Weeding is done in conjunction with Supervisor\'s instructions.

### Binding

> Prepares, collates, and assembles items for binding. Prepares
> materials upon return from the bindery and re-shelves newly bound
> items. Proofreads materials upon return from bindery for accuracy and
> resolves any issues with binder regarding such problems. Prepares
> updated serials list based on newly added items. 

-   Binding orders are normally prepared and packed within two days of
    the binding pickup.

-   Returned items are routinely back on the shelves within one week of
    receipt.

-   Serials list is updated by the end of each month.

### Reprints

> Manages reprint collection, including collation, data entry, article
> filing, retrieval and processing of reprint orders. Enter new reprints
> into the collection. 

 

-   Each week, new entries are added by COB each Friday, with a
    completion list given to the Supervisor at that time.

-   Reprint requests from staff are normally processed within one day of
    receipt.

-   Filing of materials is done as needed each week.
Day: 12/07/02

Latitude: 28°07.41 N

Water depth: 1051 m

Core number: **MD02-2563C^2^**

GMT time: 11:17

Longitude: 89°08.19 W

Location: Kane Spur

Corer type: Giant box core C^2^

Corer length: 12 m

Core length: 3.86 m

**Observations** 

Corer condition: Good

*Core condition:* Lot of gas voids and hydrocarbons

**Sections and Sampling **

*Number of sections recovered and conditions:*

3 sections of 1.5 m recovered in 2 times (D-tubes), the last section
measures 84 cm, a section of 10 cm was taken at the base of every 1.5 m
section

*Onboard sampling and post cruise processing:*

-   One set of D-tubes will be processed at Gif-sur-Yvette, the other
    one by the USGS

-   the 10 cm sections were taken for pore water analysis, (
    microbiology, and SO~4~^-^, Cl^-^, CH~4~, ^14^C, DIC) (MBARI,
    Univ.Tokyo)

-   1 bag of core top sediment was taken

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   X-ray microtomography will be processed post cruise at 80, 210, 345
    cm

-   USGS core measurements and activities : water content, (USGS-WH),
    Headspace Gas (USGS-Menlo Park), structure (ODM, PNNL)

## Summary of physical and sedimentological observations

*Dominant lithologies:* Light to dark greenish gray with common tar
(bitumen) spots and sandy layers. Formas are rare except on upper part.

*Minor lithologies*: None.
The two new servers have been temporarily named:

TDSRV1SETUP

And

TDSRV2SETUP

Both machines have had Win2k server, sp2 and all hot fixes installed.

TDSRV2SETUP has had SQL server installed as well.

The following will be the process to migrate from TDSERVERS 1 & 2 to the
new servers.

1)  Create the following shares on TDSRV1SETUP:

> [SURFRAID LC8 IDE RAID]{.underline}
>
> Users
>
> Personnel
>
> [SURFRAID FIBER SCSI RAID]{.underline}
>
> Ideas_Team
>
> Project
>
> [ONBOARD SCSI RAID]{.underline}
>
> Pcapps
>
> Helpstar
>
> Public
>
> IC
>
> NewFMDB
>
> TDWEB
>
> Traveler
>
> Bookshelf98
>
> Hswweb
>
> MacApps
>
> MacUsers
>
> TDPC01Users

2)  Do a FULL backup of all data on TDSERVER1 and TDSERVER2

3)  Use SCOPY, from the NT Resource kit to move all data from shares on
    TDSERVER1 to the new shares on TDSRV1SETUP.

4)  Copy all the logon scripts to TDSRV1SETUP.

5)  Detach all the HP NetRaid raid boxes from TDSERVER1.

6)  Detach the 270 gig SCSI raid from TDSERVER1 and attach it to
    TDSERVER2

7)  Format the 270 gig raid attached to TDSERVER2.

8)  Shutdown SQL service.

9)  Copy SQL data from NetRaid to the 270 gig SCSI raid.

10) Detach both RAID boxes from TDSERVER2 and shutdown TDSERVER2.

11) Attach 270 gig RAID box to TDSRV2SETUP.

12) Rename TDSRV2SETUP to TDSERVER2. Apply all IP address info from old
    TDSERVER2 to this new server.

13) Point SQL at the data copied over from the old server

14) Use IIS export utility to copy all web site info from TDSERVER1 to
    TDSRV1SETUP

15) Shut down TDSERVER1.

16) Rename TDSRV1SETUP to TDSERVER1. Apply all the IP address info from
    TDSERVER1 to this new server.

17) Install New version of Helpstar

18) Install New version of Helpstar web interface

19)
MESSAGE NO: 8359202 DATE: 12/24/2008

CATEGORY: CVD TYPE: LIQ

REFERENCE: REFERENCE DATE:

CASES: C-351-829

PERIOD COVERED: 01/01/2007 TO 12/31/2007

LIQ SUSPENSION DATE:

TO: DIRECTORS OF FIELD OPERATIONS, PORT DIRECTORS

FROM: DIRECTOR, SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT

RE: AUTOMATIC LIQUIDATION INSTRUCTIONS-HOT-ROLLED CARBON, STEEL FLAT
PRODUCTS FROM BRAZIL (C-351-829) LIQUIDATE, ALL ENTRIES. LIFTING OF
SUSPENSION 10/29/2008

THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE RELEASE OF THIS INFORMATION.

1\. COMMERCE DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY CONDUCT ADMINISTRATIVE

REVIEWS OF COUNTERVAILING DUTY ORDERS. INSTEAD, REVIEWS MUST

BE REQUESTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 751(a)(1) OF THE TARIFF ACT

OF 1930 AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 351.213 OF COMMERCE\'S

REGULATIONS.

2\. COMMERCE HAS NOT RECEIVED A REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE

REVIEW OF THE COUNTERVAILING DUTY ORDER FOR THE PERIOD AND ON

THE MERCHANDISE LISTED BELOW. THEREFORE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH

SECTION 351.212 OF COMMERCE\'S REGULATIONS, YOU ARE TO ASSESS

COUNTERVAILING DUTIES ON MERCHANDISE ENTERED, OR WITHDRAWN FROM

WAREHOUSE, FOR CONSUMPTION AT THE CASH DEPOSIT OR BONDING RATE

IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF ENTRY.

PRODUCT: CERTAIN HOT-ROLLED CARBON STEEL FLAT PRODUCTS

COUNTRY: BRAZIL

CASE NUMBER: C-351-829

PERIOD: 01/01/2007-12/31/2007

LIQUIDATE ALL ENTRIES.

3\. THERE ARE NO INJUNCTIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ENTRIES COVERED

BY THIS INSTRUCTION.

4\. NOTICE OF THE LIFTING OF SUSPENSION OF LIQUIDATION OF

ENTRIES OF SUBJECT MERCHANDISE DURING THE PERIOD 01/01/2007

THROUGH 12/31/2007 OCCURRED WITH THE PUBLICATION OF THE NOTICE

OF INITIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW FOR THE 09/2008

ANNIVERSARY MONTH (73 FR 64305, 10/29/2008). YOU SHALL CONTINUE

TO COLLECT CASH DEPOSITS OF ESTIMATED COUNTERVAILING DUTIES FOR

SUBSEQUENT ENTRIES OF SUBJECT MERCHANDISE AT THE CURRENT RATE.

5\. THE ASSESSMENT OF COUNTERVAILING DUTIES BY CBP ON SHIPMENTS

OR ENTRIES OF THIS MERCHANDISE IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF

SECTION 778 OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930. SECTION 778 REQUIRES

THAT CBP PAY INTEREST ON OVERPAYMENTS, OR ASSESS INTEREST ON

UNDERPAYMENTS, OF THE REQUIRED AMOUNTS DEPOSITED AS ESTIMATED

COUNTERVAILING DUTIES. THE INTEREST PROVISIONS ARE NOT

APPLICABLE TO CASH OR BONDS POSTED AS ESTIMATED COUNTERVAILING

DUTIES BEFORE THE DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE COUNTERVAILING

DUTY ORDER. INTEREST SHALL BE CALCULATED FROM THE DATE OF

LIQUIDATION. THE RATE AT WHICH SUCH INTEREST IS PAYABLE IS THE

RATE IN EFFECT UNDER SECTION 6621 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

OF 1954 FOR SUCH PERIOD.

6\. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER BY CBP

OFFICERS, THE IMPORTING PUBLIC OR INTERESTED PARTIES, PLEASE

CONTACT DAVINA HASHMI OR RON TRENTHAM AT THE OFFICE OF AD/CVD

OPERATIONS, IMPORT ADMINISTRATION, INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, AT (202) 482-0984

OR (202) 482-3577, RESPECTIVELY (GENERATED BY O6:MD).

7\. THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE RELEASE OF THIS

INFORMATION.

DAVID M. GENOVESE
# Incident Records Kit

**Supply Ordering Guide**

Use this guide to assemble pre-incident Documentation Unit supplies or
to acquire the needed supplies on an incident. It is based on typical
setup needs for an IMT.

-   **Retention Guidance**, laminated (NIFC website)

-   **IMT Instructions** (NIFC website)

-   **Graphic Examples for File Organization** single sided/laminated
    (NIFC website)

1 Set - Plans

1 Set -- For distribution to functional Sections/Units (optional, or use
Final Documentation Index)

-   **Final Documentation Index** (NIFC website)

> 1 Set -- Plans
>
> Other copies for distribution to sections as filing aide (optional, or
> use Graphic Examples)

-   **IMT File Labels**, 1/5 cut or 1/3 cut size (NIFC website)

**1/5 cut** - Avery \# 5167/# 8167 mailing labels ½" x 1 ¾", 80/page in
4 columns

**1/3 cut** - Avery \# 8366 filing labels 11/16" x 3 7/16", 30/page in 2
columns

Other store brands of compatible labels may be used but may not align as
well.

2 Sets -- Plans (1 set for labeling hanging files, 1 set for labeling
inner manila file folders)

2 Sets -- Distribute additional sets to functional Sections/Units for
labeling their files

IMT order estimate for 1/5 cut labels = 5 sheets labels/set

IMT order estimate for 1/3 cut labels = 10 sheets labels/set

-   **Manila File Folders**, 100/bx (IMT order estimate = 3 boxes (300
    folders)

> **1/5 cut --** GSA \# 7530-00-281-5941
>
> **1/3 cut --** GSA \# 7530-00-282-2507
>
> **Straight cut --** GSA \# 7530-00-291-0098

-   **Standard Hanging File Folders**, 25/bx (IMT order estimate=12
    boxes (300 folders)

> Green - GSA# 7530-01-364-9498
>
> Blue - GSA# 7530-01-364-9499
>
> Red - GSA# 7530-01-364-9500
>
> Yellow - GSA# 7530-01-364-9501
>
> \*[Note:]{.underline} Standard hanging file folders come with 2"
> plastic tabs to accommodate 1/5 cut labels. If using larger, 1/3 cut
> labels order 3 ½" plastic tabs for hanging files.

-   **1/3 Cut Hanging File Folder Tabs**, 3 ½" (needed only when using
    larger labels)

> GSA \# 7510-00-053-9662, 25/pkg

-   **Plastic Bins --** (estimate initially 6-12)

> Bins should have hinged, interlocking lid, stackable and capable of
> accommodating standard hanging files. Built in molded rails are
> preferable to metal rails. Quantity needed dependant upon incident.
> Recycle when possible.

-   [Potential Source:]{.underline} Akro-Mils #66486FILB, 21.5" x 15" x
    12.5". Available at such sources as Office Depot, Staples, etc or
    directly from manufacturer with Govt. discount.
    <http://www.akro-mils.com/home_office/coupon_display.asp?id=150>