**MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING**

**FOR THE 2008 MESON TEST BEAM PROGRAM**

**T978**

**CALICE TEST BEAM**

February 11th, 2008

**INTRODUCTION:**

This is a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Fermi National
Accelerator Laboratory and the experimenters of the CALICE Collaboration
who have committed to participate in beam tests to be carried out during
the 2008-2009 MTBF program.

This memorandum is intended solely for the purpose of providing a work
allocation for Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and the
participating universities and institutions. It reflects an arrangement
that

is currently satisfactory to the parties involved. It is recognized,
however, that changing circumstances of the evolving research program
may necessitate revisions. The parties agree to negotiate amendments to

this memorandum to reflect such revisions.

*Description of Detector and Tests:*

The CALICE Collaboration has been carrying out a major R&D effort on
calorimetry for the International Linear Collider Detector. The major
focus of this research has been the development of particle-flow
calorimetry for achieving the unprecedented jet energy resolutions
required to fully exploit the physics potential of an e^+^e^-^ collider.
As such, the prototyping efforts have concentrated on the development of
calorimeter technologies with a high degree of longitudinal and
transverse segmentation. The collaboration is studying various options
for electromagnetic (Si-W and Scint-W) and hadronic (Scint-Steel,
RPC-Steel and GEM/Micromegas-Steel) calorimeters with the aim of
comparing their performance with respect to the ILC physics
requirements.

This memorandum covers the experimental activities of the CALICE
collaboration foreseen for the year 2008. In 2008, two electromagnetic
calorimeters (Si-W and Scint-W), a Scint-Steel hadron calorimeter and a
Scint-Steel tail-catcher/muon tracker will participate in the data
taking. It is expected that in 2009, these tests will be followed by
similar data collection periods with gas (RPC-Steel,
GEM/Micromegas-Steel) hadron calorimeters. At that stage this MoU will
be extended/amended appropriately. These running periods with different
technologies in the same setting and environment are key to providing
fair comparisons of the performances of the different calorimeter
options and their suitability for a Linear Collider Detector. To this
end, it is intended to integrate the gas hadron calorimeter(s) into the
CALICE installation, DAQ and reconstruction software. The integration is
foreseen to start with individual RPC layers and prototype electronics
in dedicated test runs as part of the 2008 program.

I.  **PERSONNEL and INSTITUTIONS:**

*CALICE Spokesperson:* Jean-Claude Brient

*Fermilab Liaison:* Erik Ramberg

*CALICE Liaison:* Roman Poeschl, Vishnu Zutshi

*CALICE Run Coordinators:* Roman Poeschl, Vishnu Zutshi (preliminary)

*CALICE Mechanical Installation:* Karsten Gadow

*CALICE Remote Control:* Sven Karstensen

*CALICE DAQ:* Paul Dauncey

*CALICE Software and Computing:* Roman Poeschl, Neils Meyer

*CALICE Si-W ECAL Team Leader:* Roman Poeschl

*CALICE Si-W ECAL Experts:* Hegne Li, Marcel Reinhard

*CALICE Sci-W ECAL Team Leader:* Tohru Takeshita

*CALICE Sci-W Experts:* Kiyotomo Kawagoe, Saturo Uozumi

*CALICE Sci-Steel HCAL Team Leader:* Felix Sefkow

*CALICE Sci-Steel HCAL Experts:* Erika Garutti, Alexander Kaplan

*CALICE Sci-Steel TCMT Team Leader:* Vishnu Zutshi

*CALICE Sci-Steel TCMT Experts:* Alexander Dyshkant, Kurt Francis

These and other members of the group interested in the test beam are
listed in Appendix A.

II. **EXPERIMENTAL AREA, BEAMS & SCHEDULE CONSIDERATIONS:**

> *2.1 Location*
>
> 2.1.1 The tests will be carried out in beamline MT6, section 2C and
> 2D, contiguously.
>
> 2.1.2 The setup will consist of the HCAL and TCMT mounted on their
> motion frames, drift chambers, scintillator counters, power supplies
> and a power transformer. The ECAL will be mounted on the HCAL motion
> frame.
>
> 2.1.3 Optical fiber connections will communicate data between the
> electronics crates and the data acquisition computers.
>
> 2.1.4 Office space will be needed for 4-5 CALICE Collaboration
> members.
>
> *2.2 Beam*
>
> 2.2.1 The tests will use slow resonantly-extracted proton beam focused
> on to the MTest target. The tests require electron, pion, proton and
> muon beams.
>
> 2.2.2 Specifically the experimenters request the following momentum
> selected beams: electrons (1-25 GeV/c), hadrons (1-66 GeV/c) and
> protons (120 GeV/c). Special emphasis will be put on the low energy
> pion (1-10 GeV/c) running.

2.2.3 Momentum unselected beam dump muons will be needed for
commissioning and calibration purposes.

> 2.2.4 Triggered beam spots of a few cm^2^ are desired over the entire
> momentum range.
>
> 2.2.5 The experimenters request a Δp/p = 5% or better for beam
> energies in the1-5 GeV/c range and 2% or better for higher energies.
>
> 2.2.6 For the above, a triggered beam rate of approximately 1 kHz is
> assumed.

*2.3 Schedule*

> 2.3.1 In 2008, the CALICE collaboration requests three running periods
> of 3 weeks each. It is desirable that two of the running periods be
> before the 2008 shutdown and one after it.
>
> 2.3.2 Specifically, the following schedule is proposed for
> consideration:
>
> Installation and Commissioning : April 2008
>
> 1^st^ three week running period : May 2008
>
> 2^nd^ three week running period : July 2008
>
> 3^rd^ three week running period : to be negotiated as discussed below

2.3.3 Nominally a Si-W ECAL and Scint-Steel, HCAL and TCMT will take
beam in the first two periods. For the third period the Si-W ECAL will
be replaced by a Scint-W ECAL.

> 2.3.4 During these running periods a 4 second flat top spill structure
> is desired. It is requested that one such spill be delivered every
> minute for typically 12 hrs. a day. The experimenters seek to schedule
> the runs in the most efficient manner in order to fulfill their
> physics needs within the Fermilab guideline of less than 5% impact
> from test beam operation to the overall program.
>
> 2.3.5 The different running and setup phases will be coordinated with
> the activities of other MTBF users. In particular it would be of
> interest to find out if the CALICE setup can usefully take data in the
> parasitic mode.
>
> 2.3.6 In the event of concurrent running by another experiment during
> the CALICE installation period, the CALICE experimenters request use
> of the 6am-6pm shift. The experimenters require control of the beam
> during their commissioning period. It is expected that the
> installation and commissioning periods will last approximately 2 weeks
> each.
>
> 2.3.7 It is understood that the exact scheduling of the third running
> period cannot be finalized at the moment due to the uncertainties in
> the shutdown schedule. However, the CALICE Collaboration strongly
> urges the Lab to find a time slot for this period in 2008 itself.
> August and mid-Nov. are possible suggestions should the 10-week
> shutdown become a reality.
>
> *2.4 Setup*
>
> 2.4.1 The Si-W ECAL and the Scint-Steel HCAL will be shipped from DESY
> towards the end of February and are expected to arrive approximately 4
> weeks later. The TCMT will ship from CERN towards the end of January
> and is expected to arrive approximately 6 weeks after that.
> Storage/staging space for the detectors will be required prior to
> their installation in the experimental hall in April. The Scint-W ECAL
> will be shipped later in the year from Japan. Crane facilities will be
> needed for both the extraction of the detectors from their shipping
> containers and during the installation process.

2.4.2 Crane facilities will be needed at the final location of the
experiment and also intermittently during the running period(s).

> 2.4.3 The experimental setup will consist of two motion frames. The
> HCAL motion frame which houses the ECAL and electronics crates has a
> footprint of \~ 5m x 2.5m. The total weight of the HCAL frame along
> with the detector modules is \~ 15 tonnes. The TCMT frame sitting
> directly behind the HCAL frame rides on rails and occupies an area
> that is approx. 3m long and 3m wide. Total weight for the TCMT is \~
> 12 tonnes. Fixation for the rails will be needed in the experimental
> hall.
>
> 2.4.4 The movement and installation of the CALICE detectors in the
> experimental area will require the assistance of Fermilab equipment,
> technicians and safety experts. An agreement on the installation
> procedure and its impact on this and any other experiments should be
> worked out between FERMILAB and CALICE as soon as possible.
>
> 2.4.5 In addition to the building crane, the experimenters request the
> installation of an engine crane of 500 kg capacity inside the MTBF
> experimental enclosure for handling ECAL and HCAL detector slabs.
>
> 2.4.6 It is planned that the experimenters will bring drift chambers
> for their tracking needs. Fermilab help will be needed in providing
> movable rigging for the chambers. Survey measurements for installation
> and alignment will also be required. A non-flammable Argon-Ethane gas
> mixture for the operation of the drift chambers will be needed. The
> Fermilab MWPC\'s available in the test beam area are to be considered
> as a backup option.
>
> 2.4.7 Survey measurements for installation and alignment of the CALICE
> setup will also be required.
>
> 2.4.8 The availability of an efficient particle identification system
> will be key to these tests. Help will be needed in integrating these
> signals in the experimenters data stream.
>
> 2.4.9 Operation of some of the CALICE equipment requires \~ 400 V. The
> experimenters will be using the 70kW, 380V transformer provided by
> Fermilab. Specifications of the wiring for the emergency switches and
> the power outlets needed, have been furnished to Fermilab.
>
> 2.4.10 The running conditions will be permutation and combinations of
> the following parameters:

  ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------
  Energy            Particle Type     Angle of          Configuration
                                      Incidence         

  1-66, 120 GeV/c   e, pi, p          0, 10, 20, 30     w/ and w/o ECAL
                                      deg.              
  ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- -----------------

2.4.11 Of order 100 running conditions are planned per running period.

> 2.4.12 The experimenters wish to collect 250-500K events per running
> condition per running period. In addition a large data sample of beam
> dump muons for calibration purposes will be collected.
>
> 2.4.13 The experimenters request cooling inside the experimental
> enclosure that would keep the ambient temperature inside the tent
> below 25^0^ C. It is expected that average power dissipated will be
> \~10kW. Additionally, for the pressurized air cooling of the detector
> electronics, a heat exchanger in the form of water with a temperature
> below 18^0^ C will be needed.
>
> *2.5 Computing*
>
> 2.5.1 The computing system brought in by the experimenters will
> comprise 10 computers (called CALICE Computers hereafter), 1 disk
> array for on-site storage, 1 Gigabit Ethernet switch and 2 web cameras
> for remote control purposes.

2.5.2 The computers will be dedicated to the following tasks:

> \- 3 computers will serve as DAQ Computers

\- 1 computer will serve for online monitoring and data transfer

> \- 2 computers will serve for remote control of the experiment
>
> \- 3 computers will be used for the slow control of the experimental
> apparatus
>
> \- 1 General purpose computer.
>
> 2.5.3 CALICE will try to replicate its data processing scheme
> established during the CERN 2006/07 test beam campaign. This includes
> local caching on a storage device provided by CALICE. The data will
> then be copied by means of grid, i.e. glite tools, over the wide area
> network to the DESY mass storage with subsequent processing \'on the
> grid\'. The
>
> necessary software tools for the data transfer and submission of the
> processing jobs will be installed on a dedicated server provided by
> the CALICE collaboration. The running of the glite tools on that
> server does not constitute a concern for the Fermilab computing
> environment.

2.5.4 Fermilab will provide assistance in establishing a sustained
transfer rate of \~20 MByte/s

for the data transfer from the MTBF control room to the DESY mass
storage. This includes on-site connectivity, i.e. between the MTBF
control room and the general Fermi- lab network as well as the
connectivity to the wide area network. If necessary, dedicated tests of
the network performance when connecting to the DESY site will be
conducted.

Experts for this purpose, on both sides, will be named at a later stage.
For on-site tests of the network, Fermilab will provide tools which can
be operated by the experts of the CALICE collaboration. The relevant
CALICE experts will be introduced to these tools by the corresponding
experts on the Fermilab side.

2.5.5 The primary data storage location will be the DESY dCache system.
If, however, the transfer to DESY is interrupted by whatever reason, the
data will be copied into the Fermi dCache system. Fermilab will provide
disk space such that in principle the whole data set to be taken in 2008
can be stored there. For assurance reasons a duplicate of each file will
be made at Fermilab and held until the replication to the DESY mass
storage can happen. A need for disk space of around 40 TByte has been
identified for the 2008 data.

2.5.5.1 In principle, the entire CALICE dataset, including data taken in
the past at CERN and DESY as well as simulated data, can be hosted at
Fermilab. Here a total of approx. 100 TByte is needed until the end of
2008. More may be needed beyond that as the data volume continues to
increase. Financial contributions by the experimenters to purchase disk
space beyond the 40 TByte mentioned above and corresponding peripheral
systems is subject to further negotiations between Fermilab and CALICE.

2.5.5.2 In addition, Fermilab can provide cpu resources for the general
processing

of the CALICE data. Fermilab will provide assistance in interfacing the
glite tools as developed within the European grid efforts and the OSG
which is in use in the US and North America.

2.5.5.3 Fermilab is ready to act as a co-host of the \'vo calice\' which
is currently hosted by DESY solely. Details of the co-hosting are to
determined between Fermilab, DESY and CALICE experts at a later stage.

2.5.5.4 Note, that the items 2.5.5.1-2.5.5.3 go partially beyond the
needs for the actual data taking at Fermilab.

2.5.6 An attempt will be made to enable a remote control of the
experiment for monitoring,

diagnostics and trouble-shooting by experts. For this, part of the
CALICE computing equipment has to be directly accessible from a couple
of remote sites. Specifically, two standard Linux Computers and the two
web cameras have to be directly accessible. At all times when such
remote control is proceeding, there will be at least one experimenter
present in the MTest Facility.

2.5.7 The CALICE computers will need a cooled area in or near the
control room. Peripheral

devices (Mouse, Keyboards, Screens) to operate these computers will be
placed in the

control room. Dedicated cabling and the set up of the computing system
will be provided

by the experimenters.

2.5.9 In addition, internet access will be needed for the laptops of the
experimenters.

III. **RESPONSIBILITIES BY INSTITUTION (NON-FERMILAB):**

(\[ \] denotes cost of replacement for existing hardware)

> *3.1 Si-W ECAL*
>
> 3.1.1 Detector Slabs \[200K\]
>
> 3.1.2 Alveolar Structures \[150K\]
>
> 3.1.3 Motion Table \[15K\]
>
> 3.1.4 Power Supplies \[15K\]
>
> 3.1.5 Miscellaneous \[15K\]
>
> *3.2 Scint-W ECAL*
>
> 3.2.1 Absorber Structure \[15K\]
>
> 3.2.2 Scintillator Detectors \[20K\]
>
> 3.2.3 Photosensors \[50K\]
>
> 3.2.4 Cables \[10K\]
>
> 3.2.5 Miscellaneous \[10K\]
>
> *3.3 Scint-Steel HCAL*
>
> 3.3.1 Absorber Stack and Movable Stage \[200K\]
>
> 3.3.2 Photosensors \[80K\]
>
> 3.3.3 Electronics \[200K\]
>
> 3.3.4 Miscellaneous \[30K\]
>
> *3.4 Scint-Steel TCMT*
>
> 3.4.1 Absorber Stack and Frame \[25K\]
>
> 3.4.2 Scintillator Detectors \[50K\]
>
> 3.4.3 Electronics and Cables \[30K\]
>
> 3.4.4 Miscellaneous \[10K\]
>
> *3.5 Computing*
>
> 3.5.1 Computers \[10K\]
>
> 3.5.2 Disk Arrays \[15K\]
>
> 3.5.3 Miscellaneous \[5K\]

IV. **RESPONSIBILITIES BY INSTITUTION (FERMILAB):**

> *4.1 Fermilab Accelerator Division:*

1.  Use of MTest beam as outlined in Section 2.

2.  Maintenance of all existing standard beam line elements (SWICs, loss
    monitors, etc) instrumentation, controls, clock distribution, and
    power supplies.

3.  Reasonable access to the experimenters' equipment in the test beam.

4.  The test beam energy and beam line elements will be under the
    control of the AD Operations Department Main Control Room (MCR).

5.  Position and focus of the beam on the experimental devices under
    test will be under control of MCR. Control of secondary devices that
    provide these functions will be delegated to the experimenters as
    long as it does not violate the Shielding Assessment or provide
    potential for significant equipment damage.

4.1.6 All effort will be made to minimize double occupancy in the same
bucket.

## *4.2 Fermilab Particle Physics Division:*

4.2.1 The test-beam efforts in this MOU will make use of the Meson Test
Beam Facility. Requirements for the beam and user facilities are given
in Section 2. The Fermilab Particle Physics Division will be responsible
for coordinating overall activities in the MTest beam-line, including
use of the user beam-line controls, readout of the beam-line detectors,
and MTest gateway computer.

4.2.2 Scintillator/Cerenkov counters provided by facility for trigger,
particle id and start time.

4.2.3 If needed, two of the MWPC stations will be moved into place in
front of the calorimeters. Assistance will be provided in integrating
this chamber into the experimenters' DAQ system.

*4.3 Fermilab Computing Division:*

1.  Ethernet and printer should be available in the counting house.

2.  Connection to beams control console and remote logging (ACNET)
    should be made available in the counting house. Help will also be
    required for integrating this data stream into the experimenter\'s
    DAQ.

3.  Test beam facility DAQ computing support as needed during normal
    working hours.

4.  Assistance in providing the high speed data connection to DESY and
    if possible also to CC IN2P3 (see Sec. 2.5.3).

5.  Enabling of the remote access to the devices employed in the remote
    control of the CALICE

Experiment (see Sec. 2.5.4). In detail two computers have to be
accessible via port 443 (https)

and the two cameras will be operated on port 80 (http). It is understood
that the access to these

ports does not violate any Fermilab computing security standards. If
CALICE requires any

exemptions (such as unkerberized login access or web server exemptions),
they can be

applied for through the usual process located at
[http://security.fnal.gov](http://security.fnal.gov/) via the Request
Forms

link.

4.3.6 All CALICE computers will have kerberos login enabled as well as
regular port scans will be performed using the tools as provided by
Fermilab. Assistance in applying these tools might be needed.

4.3.7 Assistance in operation of the private laptops in compliance with
the FERMILAB

computing safety rules (see Sec. 2.5.6).

*4.4 Fermilab ES&H Section:*

1.  Assistance with safety reviews

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
V.  **SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS:**

5.1 The responsibilities of the Run Coordinator of the CALICE
Collaboration and procedures to be followed by experimenters are found
in the Fermilab publication \"Procedures for Experimenters\":
(<http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/documents/index.html>). The Run
Coordinator agrees to those responsibilities and to follow the described
procedures.

5.2 To carry out the experiment a number of Environmental, Safety and
Health (ES&H) reviews are necessary. This includes creating an
Operational Readiness Clearance document in conjunction with the
standing Particle Physics Division committee. The Run Coordinator of the
CALICE Collaboration will follow those procedures in a timely manner, as
well as any other requirements put forth by the division's safety
officer and follow all procedures in the [PPD Operating
Manual.](http://www-ppd.fnal.gov/DivOffice/Operating_Manual/index.htm)

5.3 The Run Coordinator of the CALICE Collaboration will ensure that at
least one person is present at the Meson Test Beam Facility whenever
beam is delivered and that this person is knowledgeable about the
experiment's hazards.

5.4 All regulations concerning radioactive sources will be followed. No
radioactive sources will be carried onto the site or moved without the
approval of the Fermilab ES&H section.

5.5 All items in the Fermilab Policy on Computing will be followed by
the experimenters. (<http://computing.fnal.gov/cd/policy/cpolicy.pdf>).

5.6 The Run Coordinator of the CALICE Collaboration will undertake to
ensure that no PREP or computing equipment be transferred from the
experiment to another use except with the approval of and through the
mechanism provided by the Computing Division management. They also
undertake to ensure that no modifications of PREP equipment take place
without the knowledge and consent of the Computing Division management.

5.7 The CALICE Collaboration will be responsible for maintaining and
repairing both the electronics and the computing hardware supplied by
them for the experiment. Any items for which the experiment requests
that Fermilab performs maintenance and repair should appear explicitly
in this agreement.

5.8 At the completion of the experiment:

> 5.8.1 The Run Coordinator of the CALICE Collaboration is responsible
> for the return of all PREP equipment, computing equipment and non-PREP
> data acquisition electronics. If the return is not completed after a
> period of one year after the end of running the spokesman of the group
> will be required to furnish, in writing, an explanation for any
> non-return.
>
> 5.8.2 The experimenters agree to remove their experimental equipment
> as the Laboratory requests them to. They agree to remove it
> expeditiously and in compliance with all ES&H requirements, including
> those related to transportation. All the expenses and personnel for
> the removal will be borne by the experimenters.
>
> 5.8.3 The experimenters will assist the Fermilab Divisions and
> Sections with the disposition of any articles left in the offices they
> occupied.
>
> 5.8.4 An experimenter will be available to report on the test beam
> effort at a Fermilab All Experimenters Meeting.

5.9 The experimenters\' request the setting up of a budget code with
their funds, that would allow purchases from the stock room and outside
vendors.

VI. **SIGNATURES**

> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / / 2008

Jean-Claude Brient, Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet

> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / / 2008
>
> Greg Bock, Particle Physics Division
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / / 2008
>
> Roger Dixon, Accelerator Division
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / / 2008
>
> Victoria White, Computing Division
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / / 2008
>
> William Griffing, ES&H Section
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / /2008
>
> Hugh Montgomery, Associate Director, Fermilab
>
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> / /2008
>
> Stephen Holmes, Associate Director, Fermilab

**APPENDIX I - List of CALICE members**

Jose Repond, Lei Xia

*Argonne National Laboratory***\
**Trygve Buanes, Gerald Eigen

*University of Bergen***\
**Yoshinari Mikami**\
***University of Birmingham*

George Mavromanolakis, Wenbiao Yan**\
***University of Cambridge***\
**Eduardo Cortina, Mary-Cruz Fouz**\
***CIEMAT/Madrid*\
Nicola D\'Ascenzo, Riccardo Fabbri, Erika Garutti, Angela-Isabela
Lucaci-Timoce,

Benjamin Lutz, Niels Meyer, Nanda Wattimena, Oliver Wendt\
*DESY/Hamburg*\
A. Kaplan\
*University of Heidelberg*\
Daniel Jeans\
*University of Kobe*\
Jamie Ballin , Paul Dauncey, Anne-Marie Magnan, Hakan Yilmatz\
*Imperial College London*\
Imad Laktineh, Robert Kieffer\
*INPL/Lyon*

Eugeny Tarkovsky\
*ITEP Moscow*\
Hegne Li , Roman Poeschl, Manqui Ruan\
*LAL/Orsay*\
Jean-Claude Brient, Marcel Reinhard, Allister Levi Sanchez**\
***LLR - Ecole Politechnique/Paris*\
Djamel Boumediene, Cristina Carloganu, Francois Morisseau\
*LPC/Clermont-Ferrand*\
Jean-Yves Hostachy, Laurent Morin\
*LPSC/Grenoble*\
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu\
*Royal Holloway University of London*\
Valeria Bartsch , Matthew Wing\
*University College London*\
Alexander Dyshkant, Kurt Francis, Patrick Salcido, Vishnu Zutshi**\
***Northern Illinois University*\
Miroslav Havranek, Michal Marcisovsky, Petr Mikes, Pavel Ruzicka,
Jaroslav Zalesak**\
***University Of Prague*\
Satoru Uozumi\
*Shinshu University***\
**Andy White, Jaehoon Yu

*University of Texas, Arlington*

**APPENDIX II - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION CHECKLIST**

Items for which there is anticipated need have been checked

<table>
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 4%" />
<col style="width: 4%" />
<col style="width: 2%" />
<col style="width: 19%" />
<col style="width: 4%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 16%" />
<col style="width: 4%" />
<col style="width: 31%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="4"><strong>Cryogenics</strong></td>
<td colspan="4"><strong>Electrical Equipment</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><p><strong>Hazardous/Toxic</strong></p>
<p><strong>Materials</strong></p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Beam line magnets</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Cryo/Electrical devices</td>
<td></td>
<td>List hazardous/toxic materials</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Analysis magnets</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">capacitor banks</td>
<td></td>
<td>planned for use in a beam line or experimental enclosure:</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Target</td>
<td><strong>X</strong></td>
<td colspan="3">high voltage</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Bubble chamber</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">exposed equipment over 50 V</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="4"><strong>Pressure Vessels</strong></td>
<td colspan="4"><strong>Flammable Gases or Liquids</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>inside diameter</td>
<td colspan="2">Type:</td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>operating pressure</td>
<td colspan="2">Flow rate:</td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>window material</td>
<td colspan="2">Capacity:</td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>window thickness</td>
<td colspan="4"><strong>Radioactive Sources</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="4"><strong>Vacuum Vessels</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">permanent installation</td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Target Materials</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>inside diameter</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">temporary use</td>
<td></td>
<td>Beryllium (Be)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>operating pressure</td>
<td colspan="3">Type:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Lithium (Li)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>window material</td>
<td colspan="3">Strength:</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>Mercury (Hg)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td>window thickness</td>
<td colspan="4"><strong>Hazardous Chemicals</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td>Lead (Pb)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="4"><strong>Lasers</strong></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Cyanide plating materials</td>
<td></td>
<td>Tungsten (W)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Permanent installation</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Scintillation Oil</td>
<td></td>
<td>Uranium (U)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Temporary installation</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">PCBs</td>
<td></td>
<td>Other</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Calibration</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Methane</td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Mechanical Structures</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Alignment</td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">TMAE</td>
<td></td>
<td>Lifting devices</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2">type:</td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">TEA</td>
<td><strong>X</strong></td>
<td>Motion controllers</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2">Wattage:</td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">photographic developers</td>
<td></td>
<td>scaffolding/elevated platforms</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2">class:</td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td></td>
<td colspan="3">Other: Activated Water?</td>
<td></td>
<td>Others</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>