BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
2006 NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS WEEK (NCVRW)

April 23--29, 2006

Community Awareness Projects

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **Fax to the NCVRW Committee at 202--305--2440 or 202--514--6383**    |
|                                                                       |
| **by November 18, 2005.**                                             |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

# NCVRW PROPOSAL APPLICATION

## Organization      

Program/Coalition      

Authorized Representative      

Mailing Address      

## City       State       ZIP      

Telephone Number (      )       Fax Number (      )      

E-Mail      

Please check the box that best describes your organization:

      Nonprofit       Faith-based organization       Tribal organization

      Public agency       Community coalition       Grassroots
organization

      Other (please describe)      

### 

### Proposal Components

1\. Describe the mission of your organization and the missions of the
organizations involved in the development of this NCVRW Community
Awareness Project proposal. Include information related to the history
and experience of the organizations in conducting community outreach and
public awareness activities on victims' issues.      

2\. Describe the planned NCVRW activity and the intended use of OVC
funds. Please clarify how the proposed activities target all crime
victims within your community.      

3\. Describe the roles of the collaborative partners proposing the NCVRW
activity and describe the financial and/or in-kind contributions from
each partner. (You may include letters of support from three
organizations.)      

4\. Describe why financial support is needed for the proposed NCVRW
project.      

5\. Itemize the cost of the proposed NCVRW project. Identify the cost of
items for which you will be requesting OVC reimbursement.      

**Fax the completed form to the NCVRW Committee: 202--514--6383**

**or**

> **202--305--2440**

#### CERTIFICATION

The organization's authorized representative must sign below; otherwise,
the application will not be accepted for consideration.

     

Applicant's Name (PRINTED)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Signature of Applicant

     

Date

     

Title ![](media/image3.jpeg){width="0.7527777777777778in"
height="0.45555555555555555in"}
**ASP Testing Capabilities & Services**

**A. Standard Screening:**

TEST 1 - "Qualitative Mice (I.P) - Anticonvulsant Identification"

TEST 2 - "Qualitative Rats (P.O.) - Anticonvulsant Identification"

TEST 3 - "Quantification Rats (P.O.) - Anticonvulsant Quantification"

TEST 4 - "Quantification Mice (I.P.) - Anticonvulsant Quantification"

TEST 5 - "Quantification Mice (P.O.) - Anticonvulsant Quantification"

TEST 6 - "Differentiation Mice (I.P.) - Anticonvulsant Differentiation"

TEST 7 - "6 Hz (Mice I.P.) - Mice Anticonvulsant Quantification"

TEST 8 - "ID Rat (I.P.) - Anticonvulsant Identification"

TEST 9 - "Tox Rat (I.P.) - Toxicity Screen"

TEST 10 - "Quant Rat (I.P.) - Anticonvulsant Quantification"

TEST 11 - "T/H (I.P.) - Toxicity and/or Hippocampal Kindling Screen
(Rats)"

TEST 12 - "ADT - Afterdischarge Threshold in Hippocampal Kindled Rats"

TEST 13 - "Full Hippocampal (I.P.) - Hippocampal Kindled Rats"

TEST 14 - "TTE (I.P.) - Threshold Tonic Extension (Mice)"

TEST 15 - "I.V. Met - Metrazol Threshold"

TEST 16 - "FRINGS - Audiogenic Quantification (Mice I.P.)"

TEST 17 - "Mechanisms - Electrophysiology Studies"

TEST 18 - "Flexible Format (Identification / Quantification)"

TEST 19 - "P450 - Human Cytochrome P450 Inhibition Studies"

TEST 20 - "Red Book" -- Summary Reports

TEST 21 - "*Ames Mutagenicity Assay*" -- No longer utilized

TEST 22 - "Formalin Test (Mice I.P.)"

TEST 23 - "Sciatic Ligation Model in Rats"

TEST 24 - "*In Vitro* Slice Electrophysiology Studies"

TEST 25 - "Lamotrigine Resistant Amygdala Kindled Rat"

TEST 26 - "Corneal Kindling (Focal Seizures)"

**B. Counter Measure Screening**:

TEST 71 - "Prevention of Pilocarpine-induced Status, Rats"

TEST 72 - "Pilocarpine-induced Status - Acute Intervention, Rats"

TEST 73 - "BDZ-Resistant Pilocarpine-induced Status, Rats"

TEST 74 - "Isobologram Studies, Rats"

TEST 75 - "Status Electrophysiology"

TEST 76 - "In Vitro Hippocampal Slice Culture Neuroprotection Assay"

**C. Other Special Studies**:

1\) Evaluative Consideration for Unique Chemical Classes

2\) Pilot and Proof of Principle Studies

3\) Antiepileptogenic Study Designs (Chronic 24/7EEG Monitoring)

4\) New Model Development

5\) Model Validation

**D.** **Consultation for Development and Optimization** -- Contact ASP
Staff
![](media/image1.png){width="1.6576388888888889in" height="8.125e-2in"}

**TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE**

**FOR ALL ORDERS**

**\* [MUST BE SIGNED AND RETURNED BY FAX ASAP \*]{.underline}**

This Research Material is provided as a service to the research
community. IT IS BEING SUPPLIED TO THE RECIPIENT WITH NO WARRANTIES,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Provider make no representations that the use
of the Research Material will not infringe any patent or proprietary
rights of third parties.

Should the purchaser find the above terms and conditions of sale to be
UNACCEPTABLE, the purchaser shall contact the NCI Animal Production
Program by Phone (301-846-1151) or Fax (301-846-1694) and cancel the
order within twenty-four (24) hours of the date and time the order was
placed.

Organization/Company Name (Type or Print)

[\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}

Name and Title of Signer (Type or Print)

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

**Signature of Person Authorized to Sign**:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Date: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

**\* [MUST BE SIGNED AND RETURNED BY FAX ASAP \*]{.underline}**
Table 1: Hypothetical Outcomes, Relative Risks and Likely Regulatory
Response to a Randomized Control Trial Comparing Microbicidal Product
with Placebo and to "Condom Only" Arm\*§

Two-arm Two-arm Three arm

*vs* placebo *vs* Condom Placebo Condom Both controls Possible

Only Only¹ Only² FDA Action?³ Interpretation

A RR \< 1 RR \< 1 Approve Approve Approve Microb is effective

B RR \> 1 RR \> 1 Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Microb increases risk

C RR = 1 RR = 1 Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Microb has no impact on
risk; no worse than condom only

D RR \< 1 RR = 1 Approve Disapprove ?? Microb better than placebo, but
no better than condom only

E RR \< 1 RR \> 1 Approve Disapprove ?? Microb better than placebo, but
less effective than condom only

F RR \> 1 RR = 1 Disapprove Disapprove Disapprove Microb worse than
placebo; equals condom only; Placebo protective?

G RR \> 1 RR \< 1 Disapprove Approve ?? Microb worse than placebo; both
better than "condom only"

H RR = 1 RR \< 1 Disapprove Approve ?? Microb equivalent to placebo;
both better than condom only

I RR = 1 RR \> 1 Disapprove Disapprove Disapporve Microb equivalent to
placebo; both worse than condom only

^\*^ HIV incidence compared in experimental microbicide arm *vs* control
arm: ""RR\<1.0 denotes increased risk in the control arm as compared
with the experimental arm; "RR\> 1.0" denotes decreased risk in the
control arm compared with the experimental arm; and "RR = 1.0" denotes
approximately equal risks of infection in the experimental arm

> ^§^ These interpretations assume a) that true levels of condom use do
> not vary across trial arms, and (b) that self-reports of condom use
> reflect reality. With a necessarily unblinded "condom-only" arm, both
> true levels and self-reports of their use might well vary
> systematically across trial arms, rendering these comparisons
> uninterruptible.
>
> ^1^ Likely response of regulators to the scenario presented, if they
> were reviewing a two-armed trial of experimental product and a placebo
> control
>
> ^2^ Likely response of regulators to the scenario presented, if they
> were reviewing a two-armed trial of experimental product and a
> "condom-only" control
>
> ^3^ Likely response of regulators to the scenario presented, if they
> were reviewing a three-armed trial with both a placebo and "condom
> only" control arm

**Source:** Adapted from Stein Z, Myer L, and Susser M. 2003. The design
of prophylactic trials for HIV: The case of microbicides.
[Epidemiology]{.underline}.14(1):80-84.
***BLM News***![](media/image1.png){width="0.9701388888888889in"
height="0.9041666666666667in"}

NEVADA STATE OFFICE NO. 2004-21

FOR RELEASE: February 18, 2004

CONTACTS: Maxine Shane (775) 861-6586 or Debra Kolkman (775) 289-1946

**[Saddle Horse Adoption Saturday in Carson City]{.smallcaps}**

**Palomino Valley Center also open for selection of untrained animals**

Do you have spring fever? Want to ride through the countryside? Adopt a
trained wild horse this Saturday, February 21 in Carson City. Or, select
an untrained horse at the National Wild Horse and Burro Center at
Palomino Valley, north of Sparks.

> Fourteen saddle-trained horses will be offered for adoption at the
> Warm Springs Correctional Center, Carson City, on Saturday. The gates
> open at 9:30 a.m., and a competitive bid adoption conducted by an
> auctioneer begins at 10:30 a.m. The saddle-trained animals were
> prepared at the Warm Springs Correctional Center by inmates in the
> Nevada Department of Corrections program.

Saddle-trained horses seeking homes are all wild horses removed from
public rangelands in Nevada administered by the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM). They come from the Owyhee, Monte Cristo, Jackson
Mountains, North Stillwater and Pine Nut Herd Management Areas (HMAs).
Descriptions of those HMAs are available on BLM websites. Go to
*[www.wildhorseandburro.blm.gov]{.underline}* and click on Nevada. A
photo and brief description of each saddle horse offered for adoption is
posted at that website. A link is also provided via
*www.silverstateindustries.com.*

> Potential adopters may enter the Warm Springs Correctional Center off
> Edmonds Drive in Carson City. From U.S. 395 South, take 5th Street,
> and then turn right at the roundabout onto Edmonds Drive. The public
> is asked [NOT]{.underline} to wear blue jeans, work shirts or denim
> jackets. Also, no cell phones, please. Car keys will be checked at the
> gate.
>
> -MORE-
>
> SADDLE HORSE ADOPTION SATURDAY IN CARSON CITY -- 2222
>
> For individuals interested in untrained animals, the National Center
> at Paloimino Valley will have about 75 animals in walk-up adoption
> pens. The Center will be open from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.on Saturday.
>
> Many horses were removed from a recent gather at the Lahontan HMA in
> Churchill County. There are also horses from the Nevada Wild Horse
> Range or burros from the Blue Wing HMA available for selection. Since
> some animals have not received booster innoculations, adopters at the
> Center will need to make a weekday appointment for pick up or return
> on Saturday, March 13 to take the animal home.
>
> An adoption application is available at the BLM Nevada website. For
> more information on qualifying for the saddle horse, call 775
> 861-6469. For information about the National Center adoption, call 775
> 475-2222.
>
> -30-
Certification and Accreditation Document Support Services

### Task Three -- Risk Assessments

*Note: Read the Certification and Accreditation Document Support
Services Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Statement of Work first. There
is a section in that that tied the RA\'s in with the overall BPA SOW.*

**Scope**

The Department requires independent Risk Assessments on all General
Support Systems (GSSs) and Major Applications (MAs) listed in the GSS
and MA Inventory with a completion goal of June 30, 2002. This task will
be to conduct Risk Assessments compliant with NIST Special Publication
800-30, *Risk Management for Information Technology Systems*, and
conforming to the *Department of Education Information Technology
Security Risk Assessment Guide*. The written report of each Risk
Assessment should conform to the Risk Assessment Template included in
the *Guide*. Each Risk Assessment must also validate a *NIST Security
Self-Assessment Guide for Information Technology Systems* (NIST Special
Publication 800-26) for the GSS or MA that it assessed. Each Risk
Assessment must be conducted in coordination with the Information
Assurance office within the Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Each Risk Assessment will include six steps as follows:

-   System Characterization to include a description of the business
    function that supports this GSS or MA; the hardware and software
    (and their locations) that supports this GSS or MA; the Mission
    Criticality of this GSS or MA; the level of sensitivity risk for
    confidentiality, integrity and availability for the data contained
    in this GSS or MA; the GSS supporting the system if it is a MA; any
    interdependencies with other GSSs or MAs.

-   Identification of threats to this GSS or MA

-   Identification of vulnerabilities of this GSS or MA

-   Determination of Risks for this GSS or MA

-   Remediation Plan to address all Risks determined for this GSS or MA

-   Written Report encompassing the previous five steps and in the
    format of the Template included in the Department of Education
    Information Technology Security Risk Assessment Guide.

**Deliverable Delivery Schedule.**

-   Work Breakdown Schedule for implementing this task. Date of Award
    (DOA) plus 5 business days.

-   Action Plan for completing Risk Assessments. DOA plus 10 business
    days.

-   Activities approved in action plan. To be determined.

**Period of Performance.** Base period consisting of date of award
through December 31, 2002 and one option period from January 1, 2003
through December 31, 2003. The option period is to be exercised at the
government's discretion.

**Other Pertinent Information or Special Considerations and
Requirements**

The Department encourages identification of processes and products used
by other Government entities that can be modified for use in this
Department.
WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION

FILED BY COPPER VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC.

**Report No. NCD-1430 July 20, 2007**

Re: NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION RECEIVED

Copper Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc. (CVTC), an incumbent local
exchange carrier (LEC), has filed public notice of network changes, as
required by section 51.329(a) of the rules of the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC). *See* 47 C.F.R. § 51.329(a). Upon initial review the
filing appears to be complete. *See* 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325 -- 51.335.

The incumbent LEC's notification refers to the change shown below.

-   **CVTC is connecting its Glennallen exchange and its Chitina
    exchange via fiber optic cable facilities.**

> The network change identified herein shall not be implemented within
> six months of the date filed with the Commission. *See* 47 C.F.R. §
> 51.331.

Incumbent LEC contact:

Jim Gifford

Chief -- Operating Officer

Copper Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc.

329 -- Fairbanks Street

Valdez, Alaska 99686 Phone: (907) 835-2231

Attached is a copy of the network change filing (total of four pages).
The original filing is available for inspection and copying at the FCC
Public Reference Room, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Suite CY-A257,
Washington, D.C. 20554.

For further information, contact Carmell Weathers, (202) 418-2325
(voice), or
[**carmell.weathers@fcc.gov**](mailto:carmell.weathers@fcc.gov)
(e-mail), of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition
Bureau. The TTY number is (202) 418-0484.

**-FCC-**
Table 1: Changes to plotting chart reference points.

  ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------
  Delete                 

  FMY                    Fort Myers, FL

  ABY                    Albany, GA

  LOU                    Louisville, KY

  MSY                    New Orleans, LA

  DFW                    Dallas/Fort Worth, TX

  AUS                    Austin, TX

  ROW                    Roswell, NM

  FMN                    Farmington, NM

  LVS                    LasVegas, NM

  BLI                    Bellingham, WA

  MKC                    Kansas City, MO

  MQT                    Marquette, MI
  ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------- -----------------------------------------------
  Add                     

  RSW                     Lee County, FL

  PZD                     Pecan, GA

  IIU                     Louisville, KY

  HRV                     Harvey, LA

  TTT                     Maverick, TX

  CWK                     Centex, TX

  CME                     Chisum, NM

  RSK                     Rattlesnake, NM

  FTI                     Fort Union, NM

  HUH                     Whatcom, WA

  MCI                     Kansas City, MO

  SAW                     Sawyer, MI
  ----------------------- -----------------------------------------------

Table 2: Affected AWC Product Bulletin WMO Headers

CONVECTIVE SIGMET\...WMO HEADERS

WSUS31 KKCI WSUS32 KKCI WSUS33 KKCI

AIRMET\...WMO HEADERS

WAUS41 KKCI WAUS42 KKCI WAUS43 KKCI

WAUS44 KKCI WAUS45 KKCI WAUS46 KKCI

NON-CONVECTIVE SIGMET\...WMO HEADERS

WCUS01 KKCI WSUS01 KKCI WVUS01 KKCI

WCUS02 KKCI WSUS02 KKCI WVUS02 KKCI

WCUS03 KKCI WSUS03 KKCI WVUS03 KKCI

WCUS04 KKCI WSUS04 KKCI WVUS04 KKCI

WCUS05 KKCI WSUS05 KKCI WVUS05 KKCI

WCUS06 KKCI WSUS06 KKCI WVUS06 KKCI
# References

Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P., & Cowan, W. B. (1995). Visual search for color
targets that are or are not linearly-separable from distracters. [Vision
Research, 36]{.underline}(10) 1439-1465.

Nagy, A. L., & Sanchez, R. R. (1990). Critical color differences
determined with a visual search task. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. --A,
7]{.underline}(10), 1995--2001.

Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and
performance. [Annual Review of Psychology, 52]{.underline}, 629-651.

Theeuwes, J. (1995). Abrupt luminance change pops out; abrupt color
chance does not. [Perception & Psychophysics, 57]{.underline},(5),
637-644

Theeuwes, J., & Kooi, J. L. (1994). Parallel search for a conjunction of
shape and contrast polarity. [Vision Research, 34]{.underline}(22),
3013-3016.

Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. [Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
16]{.underline}(3), 459-478.

Tsal, Y., Shalev, L., Zakay, D., & Lubow, R. E. (1994). Attention
reduces perceived brightness contrast. [The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 47a]{.underline}(4) 865-893.

Wolfe, J. M., O'Neill, P., and Bennett, S. C. (1998). [Perception and
Psychophysics, 60]{.underline}(1). 140-156.
First Solar IPO

First Solar Inc. filed to raise up to \$250 million in its initial
public offering. Press at:
\<[[http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7BD0413290%2D2944%2D407E%2D9DE7%2D60A64B9914F7%7D&siteid=mktw&dist=nbk]{.underline}](http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={D0413290-2944-407E-9DE7-60A64B9914F7}&siteid=mktw&dist=nbk)\>
or
\<[[http://tinyurl.com/hgctv]{.underline}](http://tinyurl.com/hgctv)\>
Additional Press:
\<[[http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA6349250.html]{.underline}](http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA6349250.html)\>
or
\<[[http://tinyurl.com/lfqml]{.underline}](http://tinyurl.com/lfqml)\>
\<[[http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=190100018]{.underline}](http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=190100018)\>
or
\<[[http://tinyurl.com/rbxx3]{.underline}](http://tinyurl.com/rbxx3)\>
First Solar:
\<[[http://www.firstsolar.com/]{.underline}](http://www.firstsolar.com/)\>
Task Description:

Firm shall send a check in the amount of \$10,000 to support the Gordon
Research Conference on DNA Damage, Mutation, and Cancer.

The contact person and address is listed below:

John Hays

Professor

Oregon State University

Environmental and Molecular Toxicology

1007 Agricultural and Life Sciences Bldg.,

Corvallis, Oregon 97331-7301

telephone: 541-737-3791

Check made payable to:

Gordon Research Conferences, 512 Liberty Lane, West Kingston, RI
02892-1502

\[Preparer: Kimberly Peterson, NIH/NIEHS, 919-541-7621\]
# Andreas Scholl Selected Publications

1\. Won, C. et al. Magnetic phase transition in Co/Cu/Ni/Cu(100) and
Co/Fe/Ni/Cu(100) - art. no. 147202. *Physical Review Letters* **9114**,
7202 (2003).

2\. Scholl, A. Applications of photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM)
in magnetism research \[Review\]. *Current Opinion in Solid State &
Materials Science* **7**, 59-66 (2003).

3\. Ohldag, H. et al. Correlation between exchange bias and pinned
interfacial spins - art. no. 017203. *Physical Review Letters* **9101**,
7203 (2003).

4\. Luning, J. et al. Determination of the antiferromagnetic spin axis
in epitaxial LaFeO3 films by x-ray magnetic linear dichroism
spectroscopy - art. no. 214433. *Physical Review B* **6721**, 4433
(2003).

5\. Scholl, A., Ohldag, H., Nolting, F., Stohr, J. & Padmore, H. A.
X-ray photoemission electron microscopy, a tool for the investigation of
complex magnetic structures (invited). *Review of Scientific
Instruments* **73**, 1362-6 (2002).

6\. Minko, S. et al. Lateral versus perpendicular segregation in mixed
polymer brushes. *Physical Review Letters* **88**, 035502/1-4 (2002).

7\. Scholl, A. et al. Exploring the microscopic origin of exchange bias
with photoelectron emission microscopy (invited). *Journal of Applied
Physics 89(11 Part* **89**, 7266-7268 (2001).

8\. Scholl, A. et al. Studies of the magnetic structure at the
ferromagnet-antiferromagnet interface. *Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
8(Part* **8**, 101-104 (2001).

9\. Ohldag, H. et al. Spectroscopic identification and direct imaging of
interfacial magnetic spins. *Physical Review Letters* **87**, 247201/1-4
(2001).

10\. Ohldag, H. et al. Spin reorientation at the antiferromagnetic
NiO(001) surface in response to an adjacent ferromagnet. *Physical
Review Letters* **86**, 2878-81 (2001).

11\. Thomas, L. et al. Oscillatory decay of magnetization induced by
domain-wall stray fields. *Physical Review Letters* **84**, 3462-5
(2000).

12\. Scholl, A. et al. Observation of antiferromagnetic domains in
epitaxial thin films. *Science* **287**, 1014-16 (2000).

13\. Nolting, F. et al. Direct observation of the alignment of
ferromagnetic spins by antiferromagnetic spins. *Nature* **405**, 767-9
(2000).

14\. Stohr, J. et al. Images of the antiferromagnetic structure of a
NiO(100) surface by means of X-ray magnetic linear dichroism
spectromicroscopy. *Physical Review Letters* **83**, 1862-5 (1999).

15\. Scholl, A., Baumgarten, L. & Eberhardt, W. Influence of adsorbates
and substrate interdiffusion on the spin-dependent electron scattering
of Fe/Ag(001): exploration of the parameter space for an electron spin
detector. *Physical Review B (Condensed Matter)* **56**, 747-52 (1997).

16\. Scholl, A., Baumgarten, L., Jacquemin, R. & Eberhardt, W. Ultrafast
spin dynamics of ferromagnetic thin films observed by fs spin-resolved
two-photon photoemission. *Physical Review Letters* **79**, 5146-9
(1997).
OXFORD CRYOGENIC PUMP

SERVICE REQUEST

Note: At this time normal servicing and routine replaceable parts will
be a service of the APS.

**DATE OF REQUEST:**

**CONTACT PERSON: PHONE:**

**SECTOR NUMBER:**

**SERIAL NUMBER:**

**PUMP STYLE:**

**PUMP AVAILABLE FOR**

**SERVICE ON:**

**PUMP TO BE**

**RETURNED BY:**

**CURRENT PUMP**

**HOURS:**

**HOURS SINCE LAST**

**SERVICE:**

**( ) Scheduled pump bearing change**

**( ) Burst disk blown, why?**

**( ) Buffer level probe failure**

**( ) Vessel level probe failure**

**( ) Heater probe failure**

**( ) Buffer leaking excessively, at what rate:**

**( ) Pressure sensor failure**

**( ) Electronics control rack failure, describe:**

**( ) Vacuum leaks. Identify locations and for how long:**

**( ) Other**

**Please submit your request through Rod Salazar @
[salazar@aps.anl.gov](../salazar@aps.anl.gov) or 2-9495/4-9495 and he
will submit the request to Bob Dortwegt**
\[\"The Department of the TREASURY NEWS\" banner, with \"The Department
of the Treasury 1789\" seal on right and \"BUREAU OF THE MINT; WASH.,
D.C. 20220 - W04-5011\" on 2nd line.\]

[IMMEDIATE RELEASE]{.underline}

December 20, 1972

U.S. MINT TO ACCEPT MAIL ORDERS

FOR 1972 PENNY BAGS

Mrs. Mary Brooks, Director of the Mint, announced today that the Mint
will accept mail orders for 1972 Penny Bags from January 15 through
February 15, 1973, or until the supply of 1972 cents is exhausted. If
orders during this period should exceed the 1972 cent supply the
remaining orders will be filled with 1973 cents when they are available.

The small bags are similar to the larger Mint bags used to transport
U.S. coinage to the 37 Federal Reserve Banks and branches. Each bag
contains 15 uncirculated one cent pieces \-- five each produced at the
Philadelphia and Denver Mints and at the San Francisco Assay Office.

Mail orders may be placed for multiples of five up to a total of 25.
Prices for the 1972 Penny Bags, which include the cost of handling and
shipping by insured mail, are as follows:

5 bags - \$2.00

10 bags - \$3.75

15 bags - \$5.00

20 bags - \$6.50

25 bags - \$8.00

Please address mail orders to:

Bureau of the Mint

Penny Bags

55 Mint Street

San Francisco, California 94103

Over-the-counter sales of 1972 Penny Bags at Mint outlets in Washington,
D.C., Philadelphia, Denver and San Francisco also will continue until
the supply is exhausted. The 1973 Penny Bag program will be announced at
a later date.

-o0o-

\[\"The Department of the Treasury 1789\" seal in the middle just above
the "BUREAU OF THE MINT" title.\]

**BUREAU OF THE MINT**

The fifteen coins in this bag are Uncirculated cents, five from each of
the\
following: the Philadelphia and Denver Mints and the San Francisco
Assay\
Office. The bag is similar to the larger mint bags used to transport
United States\
coinage to the 37 Federal Reserve Banks and Branches.

The portrait of Abraham Lincoln first appeared on the penny in 1909 and\
marked a historical first in U. S. coinage by being the first portrait
coin issued\
for circulation.

The difference in the face value of the coins and the total cost covers
the cost of\
material and labor in order to make this souvenir available to you.

Mary Brooks

Director of the Mint

**Bag mfg'd by the Workshop for the Blind**
### Charter of

#### The Executive Council

**of the**

#### NASA Astrobiology Institute

# Addendum I

The purpose of this addendum to the NAI Executive Council Charter is to
document three modifications to the NAI Institute Strategic Fund (ISF).

These modifications are:

1.  reduce the funds assigned to the ISF by 50%

2.  eliminate the Proposal Pre-Evaluation Committee (PPC), assigning
    equivalent initial proposal screening functions to the Deputy
    Director

3.  conduct the full Technical Merit and Priority Reviews of
    appropriately constituted proposals simultaneously.

The reduction in the funds assigned to the ISF will make available
separate funds (\$200K in FY2005) to be administered by the Deputy
Director operationally. The Deputy Director will make selections
pursuant to the prescription of the NAI Executive Council that
meritorious proposals:

-   are unlikely to achieve support through other avenues,

-   address the goals, scientific and collaborative, of the Institute
    (particularly submissions that benefit multiple Teams),

-   are submitted through a member of the Executive Council, and

-   do not exceed \$50K.

Eliminating the PPC and conducting parallel reviews for Technical Merit
and Priority will streamline the ISF process and make the program more
responsive to the needs of the NAI community.

This Addendum will come into effect immediately and will remain in place
until September 30, 2005 unless appropriately amended or revoked prior
to that date.

Approved: Dated:

G. Scott Hubbard

Director, Ames Research Center
**§14.706 Legal services in behalf of beneficiaries.**

\(a\) The Regional Counsel may furnish legal services in behalf of minor
and incompetent beneficiaries of the Department of Veterans Affairs in
fiduciary appointment and estate administration matters involving
Department of Veterans Affairs benefits or property derived therefrom
when the beneficiary's estate or income is not sufficient to justify the
employment of an attorney.

\(b\) The Regional Counsel may also furnish legal services in hardship
situations when restoration from legal disability is a condition of
precedent to direct payment of Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.

\(c\) Where the fiduciary does not in due course institute the necessary
action to terminate the trust relationship and the beneficiary requests
representation by the Regional Counsel or in any such case where there
is in question the proper administration of the estate, the Regional
Counsel may file the necessary action and supply legal services. Costs,
unless assessed against the fiduciary, should be charged to the estate
of the beneficiary.

\[42 FR 41422, Aug. 17, 1977, as amended at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996\]

**§14.707 Authorization of transportation of a veteran beneficiary for
appointment of a fiduciary.**

When the appointment of a fiduciary is required for an incompetent
veteran hospitalized by the Department of Veterans Affairs and, under
the law of the State wherein the hospital is located, the appointment
cannot be had locally, the veteran may be returned temporarily to the
jurisdiction of the appropriate court in order that the appointment can
be accomplished. If the veteran is in a Department of Veterans Affairs
hospital, the Hospital Director, upon request of the Regional Counsel,
may authorize travel of the veteran and an attendant or attendants, if
necessary. If the veteran is being maintained in a non-Department of
Veterans Affairs hospital, the Director of the facility authorizing and
paying for the care may authorize such travel upon request of the
Regional Counsel.

\[42 FR 41422, Aug. 17, 1977, as amended at 61 FR 7216, Feb. 27, 1996\]
DA 02-1807

July 26, 2002

**WRC-03 ADVISORY COMMITTEE**

**RESCHEDULES ELEVENTH MEETING**

The eleventh meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2003 World
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-03 Advisory Committee) originally
scheduled for August 22, 2002, as announced by public notice DA 02-1608
on July 15, 2002, has been rescheduled. In light of the recent
postponement of a regional meeting that had been planned for early
September, the WRC-03 Advisory Committee decided that it would be
beneficial to hold its eleventh meeting on a later date to allow more
time for the development of proposals for the 2003 World
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-03). The eleventh meeting will now be
held on September 5, 2002 from 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm, in the Commission
Meeting Room (TW-C305), 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC. The draft
agenda for the meeting is attached. At this meeting, the Advisory
Committee will consider status reports from its Informal Working Groups
(IWG) and consensus views and proposals in preparation for the 2003
World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-03). This meeting is open to
the public.

The Commission\'s WRC-03 worldwide web site (http://www.fcc.gov/wrc-03)
contains the latest updated information and agendas on all scheduled
meetings and Advisory Committee matters. Documents of all WRC-03
Advisory Committee and IWG meetings are available for public inspection
and photocopying at the FCC\'s Reference Information Center, 445 12th
Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. (telephone: 202-418-0270,
TTY: 418-2555). In addition, copies of the documents can be purchased
through the FCC\'s duplication contractor, Qualex International, Portals
II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone
202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail
**qualexint@aol.com**.

.

For further information about this meeting, contact Alexander Roytblat
of the International Bureau\'s Strategic Analysis and Negotiations
Division (telephone: 202-418-7501).

**AGENDA**

**Eleventh Meeting of the WRC-03 Advisory Committee**

**Federal Communications Commission**

**445 12th Street, S.W., Commission Meeting Room (TW-C305)**

**Washington, D.C. 20554**

**September 5, 2002; 2:00 pm - 4:00 pm**

1\. Opening Remarks

2\. Approval of Agenda

3\. Approval of the Minutes of the Tenth Meeting

4.  Reports from regional WRC-2003 Preparatory Meetings

5.  NTIA Draft Preliminary Views and Proposals

6.  IWG Reports and Documents relating to:

a\. Consensus Views and Issue Papers

b\. Draft Proposals

7.  Future Meetings

8.  Other Business

\- FCC -
**Numbers Are Stubborn Things**

Discretionary Spending in FY 2002 Budget Resolution \-- **\$661.3**
billion.

We spent **\$734.696** billion!

Discretionary Spending in FY 2003 Budget Resolution \-- **\$759**
billion.

We spent **\$849.107** billion!

Discretionary Spending in FY 2004 Budget Resolution \-- **\$784.5**
billion.

We spent **\$873.176** billion!

**Alan Greenspan told the House Budget Committee that Congress' top
priority should be to re-enact PAYGO and discretionary caps so we can
get back to a real balanced budget.**

\* In FY 2003, there was not an actual conference on the budget
resolution. The House passed a \$759 billion resolution and an
unofficial cap was set later at \$768 billion.
**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:**

Gary Wedel - (605)996-1564, Ext. 4\
Tammi Schone -- (605) 352-1102

**[USDA RURAL DEVELOPMENT OFFERS HOME REPAIR LOANS]{.underline}**

**(Mitchell, South Dakota -- February 13, 2006)** The local USDA Rural
Development office in Mitchell, which serves Aurora, Brule, Buffalo,
Davison, Douglas, Hanson, Hutchinson, Jerauld, and Sanborn Counties, is
announcing the availability of home repair loan funds for qualifying
home owners. This loan program is designed to assist qualified
applicants make necessary repairs and improvements to their existing
homes that they would not otherwise be able to afford.

Typical repairs include replacing or repairing a furnace,
insulation-weatherization, roof repairs, doors and windows, siding,
plumbing, electrical, structural defects, or any other health safety
hazard in a home.

Loan funds are currently available to low and very low income applicants
at a fixed interest rate of 1.00% for households that meet certain
income criteria. For example in Davison County a household size of 2
people with total adjusted annual income of under \$20,500 could qualify
for this program.

Interested parties should contact the Mitchell Rural Development Office
at (605) 996-1564, ext. 4. The office is located at1820 North Kimball,
Suite C, Mitchell, South Dakota.

USDA Rural Development is an Equal Housing Opportunity lender. USDA
Rural Development has ten offices in the state that assist rural
communities. Office locations include a state office in Huron, along
with area offices in Aberdeen, Huron, Mitchell, Pierre, Rapid City,
Sioux Falls, Sturgis, Watertown, and Yankton.

USDA Rural Development's mission is to deliver programs in a way that
will support increasing economic opportunity and improve the quality of
life of rural residents. Further information on rural programs is
available at a local USDA Rural Development office or by visiting USDA's
web site at <http://www/rurdev.usda.gov>.

**-USDA-**
![](media/image1.jpeg){width="6.433333333333334in" height="1.0in"}

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 25, 2002

# VA Assesses National Cemetery Conditions

> WASHINGTON \-- The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has released a
> study, *National Shrine Commitment,* providing the first independent,
> nationwide review of conditions at 119 VA national cemeteries. VA will
> use the information in the report to make funding decisions and set
> priorities for making repairs.
>
> \"This planning tool will help ensure that our cemeteries continue to
> provide the dignified and respectful setting that veterans deserve,\"
> said Secretary of Veterans Affairs Anthony J. Principi.
>
> Independent teams of engineers and architects conducted extensive site
> visits to each cemetery to identify and recommend projects for
> improving the condition, function or appearance of the cemeteries.
> They assessed burial sections, roadways, buildings, historic
> structures and identified 928 potential improvement projects at an
> estimated cost of \$280 million.
>
> The report is the final one of three reports on VA\'s national
> cemeteries required by the Veterans Millennium Health Care and
> Benefits Act. Previously issued reports covered the feasibility of
> setting national cemetery standards of appearance that would be
> commensurate with those of the world\'s finest cemeteries and an
> assessment of the future burial needs of veterans through 2020.
>
> VA officials emphasized that the maintenance of cemetery grounds and
> facilities requires continuing efforts. VA's budgets for fiscal years
> 2001 through 2003 include a total of \$25 million for gravesite
> renovation and repair projects. This funding, as well as other
> expenditures and work already scheduled, will accomplish some of the
> improvements
>
> **- More -**

## National cemetery conditions study 2/2/2

identified in the report. VA officials said they will set priorities for
completing the recommended projects. Priorities will be based on the
nature and severity of the problems and on data from the survey on
customer satisfaction with the cemeteries. VA will also evaluate the
long-term benefits of the contractor's recommended repairs and establish
a timeline for funding the projects.

> VA now manages 120 national cemeteries in the United States and Puerto
> Rico, half of which date to the Civil War. Fort Sill National Cemetery
> in Oklahoma opened for service after the study was completed. Burial
> in a national cemetery is open to all military personnel and veterans
> of the U.S. armed forces discharged under conditions other than
> dishonorable, their spouses and dependent children.
>
> Information on VA burial benefits can be obtained from national
> cemetery offices, from VA web sites on the Internet at
> [http://www.va.gov](http://www.va.gov/) or
> [http://www.cem.va.gov](http://www.cem.va.gov/) or by calling VA
> regional offices toll-free at 1-800-827-1000.
>
> \# \# \#

People wishing to receive e-mail from VA with the latest news releases
and updated fact sheets can subscribe at the following Internet address:

<http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/opalist_listserv.cfm>
**Human Capital Survey**

**December 2005**

**Question 34**

Question: What job series do you fall under (PATCO)?

Response: Other \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

1.  Not sure\....I\'m a Farm Bill Assistant

2.  458 series

3.  470 series

4.  ALL of the above - District Conservationist

5.  Arts and Information

6.  both clerical & technical

7.  Civil Engineering

8.  Civil Engineering Technician

9.  Contract

10. District Conservationist

11. District employee

12. don\'t know

13. Don\'t know

14. don\'t know

15. Don\'t Know

16. Don\'t know

17. Don\'t Know

18. don\'t know - I am a systems analyst

19. Don\'t know what PATCO is, explaination would have been nice, I\'m
    guessing that I fall in technical

20. don\'t know what PATCO is. I am a GS-12 RC&D Coor.

21. don\'t know\--either professional or technical. What is PATCO?

22. Engineering

23. Financial

24. GS 457

25. GS11 Soil Conservationist

26. GS401

27. GS-457

28. GS-470

29. GS-470 series

30. I don\'t know what PATCO is but most likely technical.

31. I have no idea

32. manager

33. manager

34. May be technical (457 series)

35. n/a

36. Non Professional/ Our state office calls anyone that is not a
    District Conservationist, Soil Conservationist or an engineer non
    professionals. our opinion does not matter here in West Virginia

37. not sure

38. Not Sure

39. p

40. partner

41. Professional and Technical

42. Professional BUT If the information from the previous sections
    wasn\'t confidential as well then destroy all the previously
    provided information before and after question #34.

43. Public Affairs

44. public affairs

45. Q34Specified_5

46. Question 35 is discriminatory and I will anwer it incorrectly\...you
    figure it out.

47. Secretary

48. Soil Conservation Technician

49. Soil Conservationist

50. soil conservationist

51. Soil Conservationist

52. Soil Scientist

53. STEP

54. STEP Employee

55. Student Trainee

56. Student Trainee

57. temp

58. Temp. WAE Financial Clerk

59. Temporary

60. Temporary

61. Temporary

62. Training

63. WAE

64. WA-E clerical

65. WAE since 1997

66. Wat is PATCO?

67. What is PATCO?

68. who knows\.....

69. who knows? what PATCO?

70. would rather not say
**IN THE UNITED DISTRICT COURT**

**FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS**

**EASTERN DIVISION**

**UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )**

**)**

**Plaintiff, )**

**)**

**v. ) Civ. No. 58-C-1159**

**)**

**TRUE TEMPER CORPORATION; )**

**WILSON ATHLETIC GOODS MFG. CO., )**

**INC.; A.G. SPALDING & BROS., INC.; )**

**MACGREGOR SPORT PRODUCTS, INC. )**

**AND HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO., )**

**)**

**Defendants. )**

**\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
)**

**ORDER ESTABLISHING NOTICE AND PUBLIC COMMENT**

**PROCEDURES FOR MOTION TO TERMINATE 1961 FINAL JUDGMENT**

True Temper Sports, Inc. (\"True Temper\"), successor in interest to
defendant True Temper Corporation, having moved for an order terminating
the Final Judgment entered by this Court on August 1, 1961 (\"1961 Final
Judgment\") in the above-captioned matter; and Plaintiff United States,
having tentatively consented to the motion, and Plaintiff having
proposed, and True Temper having agreed, that notice of the motion and
the United States\' tentative consent to it be published at the expense
of True Temper, and that all interested persons be given an opportunity
to submit comments concerning the proposed termination of the 1961 Final
Judgment, and it appearing to the Court desirable to invite such
comments, and in consideration of the Stipulation of the parties dated
February \_\_\_, 2008, it is

ORDERED that defendant True Temper shall publish at its own expense a
notice in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A in (a) two consecutive
issues of *The Wall Street Journal* and (b) two consecutive publications
of *Golf World*, and file proof of such publications with the Court; and
it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that copies of all comments received by the United
States within sixty (60) days after the last publication of the notices
required by this Order shall be filed with this Court by Plaintiff
promptly after it receives such comments; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that this Court will not rule upon defendant True
Temper\'s motion until at least seventy (70) days after the last
publication of the notices required by this Order and the publication by
the United States of a notice in the *Federal Register* announcing these
proceedings.

DONE, this \_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, 2008.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

United States District Judge

Copies To:

Rosemary Simota Thompson Robert E. Hauberg, Jr.

Attorney for the United States John G. Calender

United States Department of Justice Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &

Antitrust Division Berkowitz, P.C.

209 South LaSalle Street, Suite 600 555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Sixth
Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60604 Washington, DC 20004

\(312\) 353-7530 (202) 508-3474

\(312\) 353-1046 (facsimile) (202) 220-2274 (facsimile)
**[Georgetown University -- Online Graduate Certificate in Biohazardous
Threat Agents and Emerging Infectious Diseases]{.underline}**

Georgetown University Medical Center, Department of Microbiology &
Immunology, is offering an online Graduate Certificate in Biohazadous
Threat Agents and Emerging Infectious Diseases. The new graduate program
will focus on the science behind the agents and diseases in question.
The curriculum includes the Microbiology of CDC Category A through C
biothreat agents, i.e. smallpox, plague, anthrax, tularemia, and Ebola
-- an overview of bioterrorism and the need for biosurveillance, and
homeland security.

The Certificate is composted of four (4) core online 3-credit courses.
The credit hours are transferable to other graduate degree programs at
Georgetown. All courses are required and there are no electives.

The online Graduate Certificate in Biohazardous Threat Agents and
Emerging Infectious Diseases Curriculum:

-   Microbiology of Biological Threat Agents and Emerging Infectious
    Diseases

-   Biosurveillance I: An Applied, Multidisciplinary Perspective

-   Bioterrorism

-   Homeland Security 2015

The Graduate Certificate in Biohazardous Threat Agents and Emerging
Infectious Diseases is open to students with prior exposure to science
at either the academic or professional level.

Georgetown University is granted accreditation by the Middle States
Association of Colleges and Schools, Commission on Higher Education.

For more information:

> Contact: Minnie An\
> Coordinator, Graduate Programs\
> Department of Microbiology and Immunology
>
> Medical-Dental Building, SW311\
> 3900 Reservoir Rd\
> Georgetown University\
> Washington, DC 20057-1440\
> Ph: 202-687-3422
>
> Fax:
>
> Email: <ma554@georgetown.edu>
>
> Additional Information:
> <http://microbiology.georgetown.edu/education/onlinecertificate/index.html>
>
> Additional Phone:
>
> Update: 10/11/07

**"Please note: Some of the Web sites linked to in this document are not
federal government Web sites, and may not necessarily operate under the
same laws, regulations, and policies as federal Web sites."**
**STATEMENT OF**

**COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS,**

**CONCURRING**

Re: *IP-Enabled Services*, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (WC Docket No.
04-28)

After two years of dialogue on classifying, reclassifying and
declassifying services, in this proceeding the Commission finally
focuses on the consequences of a Title I approach on a whole range of
public safety, emergency response, universal service and disabilities
access policies that we have a duty to protect. I have long advocated
that we do this.

But I limit my support to concurring here because this proceeding on
IP-enabled services strikes me as getting rather too close to final
conclusions. In this Notice, we seem to be judging IP-related services
without defining them. We ask questions about how to classify these
ill-defined services, but then presume, or at least suggest, the
answers. The impression is left that we are asking what rules we should
apply ***when*** we relocate whole services and technologies to Title I
from Title II. Were we eventually to take this route, we would be
rewriting the 1996 Act---from top to bottom. This agency has no right to
substitute its reclassification wishes for the will of Congress.

So I will support this Notice only with the understanding that, once we
have a full record, our options remain completely open.

We all marvel at the transformative potential of new IP services. They
sizzle with possibility for consumers and businesses alike. But for this
transformation to happen with real spark, we need keep some fundamentals
in mind. For example, we need to address intercarrier compensation to
create a level playing field that minimizes arbitrages and maximizes the
opportunities for new technologies to flourish. And we must recognize
the role that universal service will play to make sure that all areas of
the nation are covered with the technologies to create a seamless
communications system and a seamless country. IP applications will only
revolutionize communications if everyone has access to really high
capacity bandwidth. Only when everyone, everywhere in America has access
to broadband, will the IP transformation we herald here really take
place.