##### U.S. Department of Education November 2002

**2002-2003 *No Child Left Behind---Blue Ribbon Schools Program***

**Cover Sheet**

Name of Principal [Mr. Brent Ray Rumbo]{.underline}

(Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other) (As it should appear in the
official records)

Official School Name [Cayuga Elementary]{.underline}

(As it should appear in the official records)

School Mailing Address [P.O. Box 427]{.underline}
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(If address is P.O. Box, also include street address)

[Cayuga TX 75832-0427]{.underline}\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

City State Zip Code+4 (9 digits total)

Tel. [( 903) 928-2295]{.underline} Fax [( 903 ) 928-2387]{.underline}

Website/URL [www.cayuga.esc7.net]{.underline} Email
[brumbo@cayuga.esc7.net]{.underline}

I have reviewed the information in this application, including the
eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my
knowledge all information is accurate.

Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Principal's Signature)

*Private Schools: If the information requested is not applicable, write
N/A in the space.*

Name of Superintendent [Rodney Fausett]{.underline}

(Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other)

District Name [Cayuga ISD]{.underline} Tel. [( 903 )
928-2295]{.underline}

I have reviewed the information in this application, including the
eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my
knowledge it is accurate.

Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
(Superintendent's Signature)

Name of School Board

President/Chairperson [David Rhodes]{.underline}

(Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other)

I have reviewed the information in this package, including the
eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my
knowledge it is accurate.

Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(School Board President's/Chairperson's Signature)

**[PART II ‑ DEMOGRAPHIC DATA]{.underline}**

**DISTRICT**

1\. Number of schools in the district: \_\_1\_\_ Elementary schools

\_\_1\_\_ Middle schools

\_\_\_\_\_ Junior high schools

\_\_1\_\_ High schools

\_\_3\_\_ TOTAL

2\. District Per Pupil Expenditure: \_\_7,915\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Average State Per Pupil Expenditure: \_\_6,913\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

**SCHOOL** (To be completed by all schools)

3\. Category that best describes the area where the school is located:

> \[ \] Urban or large central city
>
> \[ \] Suburban school with characteristics typical of an urban area
>
> \[ \] Suburban
>
> \[ \] Small city or town in a rural area
>
> \[ \* \] Rural

4\. 1 Number of years the principal has been in her/his position at this
school.

5 If fewer than three years, how long was the previous principal at this
school?

5\. Number of students enrolled at each grade level or its equivalent in
applying school:

  ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- --------- -- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
  **Grade**   **\# of   **\# of                **Grade      **Grade**   **\# of   **\# of     **Grade
              Males**   Females**              Total**                  Males**   Females**   Total**

  **K**       15        19                     **34**       **7**                             

  **1**       20        24                     **44**       **8**                             

  **2**       21        21                     **42**       **9**                             

  **3**       26        25                     **51**       **10**                            

  **4**       22        24                     **46**       **11**                            

  **5**       24        25                     **49**       **12**                            

  **6**                                                     Other                             

                                    **TOTAL                                                   284
                                    STUDENTS                                                  
                                    IN THE                                                    
                                    APPLYING                                                  
                                    SCHOOL**                                                  
  ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- --------- -- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------

6\. Racial/ethnic composition of 85 % White

the students in the school: 10 % Black or African American

[5]{.underline} % Hispanic or Latino

0 % Asian/Pacific Islander

0 % American Indian/Alaskan Native

**100% Total**

7\. Student turnover, or mobility rate, during the past year:
\_22\_\_\_\_\_\_\_%

> (This rate includes the total number of students who transferred to or
> from different schools between October 1 and the end of the school
> year, divided by the total number of students in the school as of
> October 1, multiplied by 100.)

  ----------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------
  **(1)**     Number of students who transferred 38
              ***to*** the school after October  
              1 until the end of the year.       

  **(2)**     Number of students who transferred 39
              ***from*** the school after        
              October 1 until the end of the     
              year.                              

  **(3)**     Subtotal of all transferred        77
              students \[sum of rows (1) and     
              (2)\]                              

  **(4)**     Total number of students in the    287
              school as of October 1             

  **(5)**     Subtotal in row (3) divided by     .26
              total in row (4)                   

  **(6)**     Amount in row (5) multiplied by    26.8
              100                                
  ----------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------

8\. Limited English Proficient students in the school:
\_1.1\_\_\_\_\_\_%

3\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Total Number Limited English Proficient

Number of languages represented: \_\_\_\_2\_\_\_\_

Specify languages:

9\. Students eligible for free/reduced-priced meals:
\_\_\_31.7\_\_\_\_\_%

\_\_\_\_90\_\_\_\_Total Number Students Who Qualify

10\. Students receiving special education services:
\_\_13.4\_\_\_\_\_\_%

\_\_38\_\_\_\_\_\_Total Number of Students Served

> Indicate below the number of students with disabilities according to
> conditions designated in the Individuals with Disabilities Education
> Act.

\_\_\_\_Autism \_\_\_\_Orthopedic Impairment

\_\_\_\_Deafness \_\_\_\_Other Health Impaired

\_\_\_\_Deaf-Blindness 26\_\_Specific Learning Disability

\_\_\_\_Hearing Impairment 10\_\_Speech or Language Impairment

2\_\_\_Mental Retardation \_\_\_\_Traumatic Brain Injury

\_\_\_\_Multiple Disabilities \_\_\_\_Visual Impairment Including
Blindness

11. Indicate number of full‑time and part‑time staff members in each of
    the categories below:

    **Number of Staff**

**[Full-time]{.underline}** **[Part-Time]{.underline}**

Administrator(s) \_\_\_1.3\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_0\_\_\_\_\_

Classroom teachers \_\_\_26\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_0\_\_\_\_\_

Special resource teachers/specialists \_\_\_2\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_0\_\_\_\_\_

Paraprofessionals \_\_\_9\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_0\_\_\_\_\_

> Support staff \_\_\_1.7\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_0\_\_\_\_\_
>
> Total number \_\_\_40\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_0\_\_\_\_\_

12\. Student-"classroom teacher" ratio: \_\_\_13.6\_\_\_\_

13\. Show the attendance patterns of teachers and students. The student
drop-off rate is the difference between the number of entering students
and the number of exiting students from the same cohort. (From the same
cohort, subtract the number of exiting students from the number of
entering students; divide that number by the number of entering
students; multiply by 100 to get the percentage drop-off rate.) Briefly
explain in 100 words or fewer any major discrepancy between the dropout
rate and the drop-off rate. Only middle and high schools need to supply
dropout and drop-off rates.

  ------------------------ -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------
                           2001-2002            2000-2001            1999-2000            1998-1999            1997-1998

  Daily student attendance [96.9]{.underline}   [96]{.underline}     [97.4]{.underline}   [97]{.underline}     [97.6]{.underline}

  Daily teacher attendance [98.2]{.underline}   [98.7]{.underline}   [99.1]{.underline}   [98.6]{.underline}   [98.2]{.underline}

  Teacher turnover rate    [2%]{.underline}     [2%]{.underline}     [2.5%]{.underline}   [3%]{.underline}     [2%]{.underline}

  Student dropout rate     [0]{.underline}      [0]{.underline}      [0]{.underline}      [0]{.underline}      [0]{.underline}

  Student drop-off rate    0                    0                    0                    0                    0
  ------------------------ -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------------------

**[PART III -- SUMMARY]{.underline}**

Provide a brief, coherent narrative snapshot of the school in one page
(approximately 475 words). Include at least a summary of the school's
mission or vision in the statement and begin the first sentence with the
school's name, city, and state.

Cayuga Elementary of Cayuga, Texas is located in Western Anderson
County. While the district contains 230 square miles, its student
enrolment is 530. The elementary campus consists of 254 students.

Cayuga ISD, which was founded in 1850, consist today of an elementary,
middle, and high school campus. The communities of Cayuga, Bradford,
Bois D'Arc, Blackfoot, Yard, Bethel, and Tennessee Colony compose the
Cayuga ISD

There are five prison units and one state jail facility within the
district. Also located in the district is the 1200-acre Gus Engling
Wildlife Preserve. The top industries in CISD are Anadarko Gas Treating
Incorporated, Enserch Corporation, Texas Utilities Fuel and Electric
Company, and Texaco Producing Incorporated.

The Cayuga ISD has a rich tradition in academics with Exemplary campuses
according to the Texas Education Agency and the school's performance on
standardized testing.

The Mission of Cayuga ISD is as follows: Cayuga ISD is dedicated to
developing and implementing curriculum designed to educate students to
reach their maximum potential; thereby, enabling them to become
productive citizens in changing society.

Cayuga provides an array of student services to include guidance and
counseling, speech, special education, Title I at-risk reading and math
programs, remedial reading/dyslexia and classes for homebound students.
In addition the elementary provides ESL, distance-learning classes and
an array of opportunities for students to be involved in student clubs
and organizations.

**[PART IV -- INDICATORS OF ACADEMIC SUCCESS]{.underline}**

1.  Show in one-half page (approximately 200 words) how the school uses
    assessment data to understand and improve student and school
    performance.

Cayuga Elementary uses the data derived from the Texas Assessment of
knowledge and skills and Iowa Test of Basis Skills to determine
instructional direction, areas for remediation, staff development, and
budgeting. Each year the test are disaggregated according to test
objective and student responses. In addition we break the test down by
individual subject, classroom, and student The Texas standardized test
are correlated to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills and are
therefore an accurate representation of the State of Texas curriculum.
At the beginning of each school year the faculty has several days of
group planning and individual teacher meetings with the principal to
determine a course of action. Parents are also asked for input
concerning our assessment data through the site-based decision-making
process and parent forums. Within the first week of school, teachers
develop a plan of attack for instruction and scope and sequence of their
curriculum. These plans are made in collaboration with the school
principal. Throughout the year and at periodic intervals teachers asses
students through benchmark exams to ensure adequate progress and to
modify instruction as needed.

2.  Describe in one-half page how the school communicates student
    performance, including assessment data, to parents, students, and
    the community.

Student performance data and student progress reports are distributed to
parents each six-weeks. In addition parents are invited to participate
in two parent forums during the school year to discuss assessment data,
student requirements and the instructional direction of the school. As
mandated by the state of Texas the elementary distributes assessment
results, and a school report card pertaining to student assessment data
to all parents and members of the community. In addition parents and
community members are afforded the opportunity to participate in
district and campus forums in which the assessment data is discussed and
distributed

3.  Describe in one-half page how the school will share its successes
    with other schools.

Cayuga Elementary developed the partnering schools program in which
school teachers and administrators are afforded monthly opportunities to
collaborate, observe lessons, discuss curriculum opportunities, and
share innovative ideas. The programs of Cayuga Elementary will continue
to be a focus of these forums as well as parent/community meetings.
Currently the elementary faculty have been encouraged to share their
programs and successes in the local papers, district web page, and
through professional journals. In addition teachers and administrators
are encouraged to present during educational conferences and at
organizational meetings.

**[PART V -- CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION]{.underline}**

1.  (**Elementary Schools**) Describe in one-half page the school's
    reading curriculum, including a description of why the school chose
    this particular approach to reading.

Cayuga Elementary is dedicated to a philosophy that Reading is central
to student learning. In first grade, the challenge for children is to
learn how to read. In fourth grade and up, it is taken for granted that
they are capable of reading to learn. The second and third grades are
critical years for ensuring that all students can make this transition
by building their capacity to comprehend more difficult and varied
texts.

Cayuga focuses on the needs of each student in determining reading
instruction. In kindergarten and pre-kindergarten, students use a
variety of concrete manipulative as well visual and auditory aids to
assist in letter recognition and phonemic sounds of letters and
combinations. First grade uses Scholastic leveled reading program,
phonemic sound instructional methods, Reading Recovery assistance,
guided reading and whole language instruction to ensure reading success.
As students enter the second grade they continue with Scholastic leveled
reading program, guided reading and are assisted through Reading
Recovery remediation methods to ensure adequate progress. By the end of
second grade students are instructed through guided reading and
comprehension inquiry and discussion.

2.  Describe in one-half page one other curriculum area of the school's
    choice and show how it relates to essential skills and knowledge
    based on the school's mission.

Cayuga Elementary takes great pride in our acceleration and enrichment
programs provided through our enrichment and Gifted and Talented
curriculum. Students in the enrichment classes are provided
opportunities to become involved with project-based learning and
instruction. Students participate in on-line student discussion groups,
internet research, field discovery, lecture/career field speakers, and
project presentation. This year students in the enrichment/advancement
program are working with engineers and representatives from NASA to
discover and learn about the history of flight, space travel and
inventions. Students are given an opportunity in this program to be
exposed to a differentiated curriculum. Curriculum content integrates
multiple disciplines and allows for in-depth learning of self-selected
topics. Students focus on open-ended task and are exposed to higher
level/abstract learning.

3.  Describe in one-half page the different instructional methods the
    school uses to improve student learning.

Cayuga Elementary uses a variety of instructional methods to meet the
needs of a variety of learning styles. Our primary focus is to encourage
higher order thinking skills and success of student learning. Cayuga
strives to integrate multiple curriculums within each lesson to ensure
students make connections of the learning. Students are involved in
research on-line and through library/media services. Computer based
learning/instruction has proven to be one of our greatest incentives and
instructional delivery methods. Students also participate in discussion
groups within their class and across grades. The majority of student
instruction is teacher guided with students having opportunity for
decisions and questioning.

4.  Describe in one-half page the school's professional development
    program and its impact on improving student achievement.

Professional development is centered on student needs. At the end of
each school year the staff develops a needs assessment based on student
needs and student performance. Teachers have input concerning area they
would like more assistance in and discussions are held concerning
student progress. The professional development calendar of events is
determined through the site-based decision making team. Throughout the
year the faculty will visit the plan to determine completion of
professional development areas and the need for additional training.
This method of professional development has served the staff well due to
group involvement and employee support.

**[SAMPLE FORMAT FOR STATE CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTS]{.underline}**

The Data Display Table is illustrated on the following page.

Provide the following information for all tests in reading (language
arts or English) and mathematics. Complete a separate form for reading
(language arts or English) and mathematics at each grade level.

Grade\_\_\_\_3\_\_\_ Test-\_\_\_\_Texas Assessment of Academic
Skills\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Edition/publication year\_\_\_\_2002\_\_\_\_ Publisher- Texas
Education_Agency\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

What groups were excluded from testing? Why, and how were they
assessed?\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

None
exculeded\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Number excluded\_\_\_\_\_0\_\_\_ Percent excluded\_\_\_\_\_0\_\_\_

Grade\_\_\_\_4\_\_\_ Test-\_\_\_TAAS\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Edition/publication year\_\_\_\_2002\_\_\_\_ Publisher
\_\_\_\_TEA\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

What groups were excluded from testing? Why, and how were they
assessed?\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

None
exculeded\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Number excluded\_\_\_\_\_0\_\_\_ Percent excluded\_\_\_\_\_0\_\_\_

Grade\_\_\_\_\_5\_\_ Test-\_\_TAAS\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Edition/publication year\_\_\_\_2002\_\_\_\_ Publisher
\_\_\_TEA\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

What groups were excluded from testing? Why, and how were they
assessed?\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

None
exculeded\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Number excluded\_\_\_\_\_0\_\_\_ Percent excluded\_\_\_\_\_0\_\_\_

Students taking the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills
standardized test are required to perform at a level in excess of basic.
All students passing the exam have mastered a level equivalent to or at
a proficient level, which means they have mastered the curriculum
requirements for the grade tested. The test is correlated the Texas
Essential Knowledge and Skills (curriculum and passing requirements for
the state of Texas). Percentage requirements of correctly answered
material, required for proficient, vary from year to year and within
different tested disciplines. Each year the state of Texas increases the
percentage required and the intensity level of the exam. Students
typically are required to correctly answer 95% of the tested material to
obtain an advanced level. Schools are given results in percentages of
students passing the exam. For example if a school has 92% on 3^rd^
grade reading this is an indication that 96% of the third grade students
passed the exam and not that the students were successful with 96% of
the tested material.

**TAKS Reading 3rd**

  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      2001-2002   2000-2001   1999-2000   1998-1999   1997-1998

  Testing month                                       Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.

  SCHOOL SCORES                                                                                       

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        94.3%       100%        100%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        94.3%       100%        100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  Number of students tested                           51          47          39          39          38

  Percent of total students tested                    100%        100%        87%         91.9        90.5%

  Number of students excluded                         0           0           5           3           4

  Percent of students excluded                        0%          0%          13%         8.1%        9.5%

  SUBGROUP SCORES                                                                                     

  1.\_\_White\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (specify                                                  
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        93.8%       100%        100%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        93.8%       100%        100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  2.\_\_\_Black\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                   
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        NA          NA          100%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        NA          NA          100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  3.\_\_\_Hispanic\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                    
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  4\. Economically Disadvantaged                                                                      

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        100%        100%        100%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        100%        100%        100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  STATE SCORES                                                                                        

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                                                                   

  State Mean Score                                    88.0%       86.8%       87.9%       88.0%       86.2%

  At or Above Proficient                                                                              

  State Mean Score                                    88.0%       86.8%       87.9%       88.0%       86.2%

  At Advanced                                                                                         

  State Mean Score                                    NA          NA          NA          NA          NA
  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

TAKS Math 3rd

  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      2001-2002   2000-2001   1999-2000   1998-1999   1997-1998

  Testing month                                       Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.

  SCHOOL SCORES                                                                                       

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        97.5%       91.7%       86.7%       96.9%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        97.5%       91.7%       86.7%       96.9%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  Number of students tested                           51          47          39          39          38

  Percent of total students tested                    100%        100%        87%         91.9%       90.5

  Number of students excluded                         0           0           5           3           4

  Percent of students excluded                        0%          0%          13%         8.1%        9.5%

  SUBGROUP SCORES                                                                                     

  1.\_\_White\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (specify                                                  
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        96.9%       93.8%       84.0%       100%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        96.9%       93.8%       84.0%       100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  2.\_\_\_Black\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                   
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        NA          NA          88.9%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        NA          NA          88.9%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  3.\_\_\_Hispanic\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                    
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  4\. Economically Disadvantaged                                                                      

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        83.3%       83.3%       90.9%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        83.3%       83.3%       90.9%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  STATE SCORES                                                                                        

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                                                                   

  State Mean Score                                    87.4%       83.1%       80.6%       83.1%       81.0%

  At or Above Proficient                                                                              

  State Mean Score                                    87.4%       83.1%       80.6%       83.1%       81.0%

  At Advanced                                                                                         

  State Mean Score                                    NA          NA          NA          NA          NA
  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

TAKS Reading 4th

  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      2001-2002   2000-2001   1999-2000   1998-1999   1997-1998

  Testing month                                       Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.

  SCHOOL SCORES                                                                                       

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        97.6%       100%        95.0%       88.2%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        97.6%       100%        95.0%       88.2%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  Number of students tested                           46          50          34          46          44

  Percent of total students tested                    100%        100%        87%         91.9%       90.5%

  Number of students excluded                         0           0           5           4           4

  Percent of students excluded                        0%          0%          13%         8.1%        9.5%

  SUBGROUP SCORES                                                                                     

  1.\_\_White\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (specify                                                  
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        97.4%       100%        96.8%       88.2%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        97.4%       100%        96.8%       88.2%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  2.\_\_\_Black\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                   
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          100%        77.8%

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          100%        77.8%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  3.\_\_\_Hispanic\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                    
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  4\. Economically Disadvantaged                                                                      

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        100%        84.6%       66.7%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        100%        84.6%       66.7%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  STATE SCORES                                                                                        

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                                                                   

  State Mean Score                                    92.5%       90.8%       89.9%       88.8%       89.7%

  At or Above Proficient                                                                              

  State Mean Score                                    92.5%       90.8%       89.9%       88.8%       89.7%

  At Advanced                                                                                         

  State Mean Score                                    NA          NA          NA          NA          NA
  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

TAKS Math 4th

  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      2001-2002   2000-2001   1999-2000   1998-1999   1997-1998

  Testing month                                       Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.

  SCHOOL SCORES                                                                                       

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                   97.4%       93.0%       88.0%       92.5%       97.1%

  At or Above Proficient                              97.4%       93.0%       88.0%       92.5%       97.1%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  Number of students tested                           46          50          34          46          44

  Percent of total students tested                    100%        100%        87%         91.9%       90.5%

  Number of students excluded                         0           0           5           4           4

  Percent of students excluded                        0%          0%          13%         8.1%        9.5%

  SUBGROUP SCORES                                                                                     

  1.\_\_White\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (specify                                                  
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   96.8%       91.9%       87.0%       93.5%       95.8%

  At or Above Proficient                              96.8%       91.9%       87.0%       93.5%       95.8%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  2.\_\_\_Black\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                   
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          100%        NA          85.7%       100%

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          100%        NA          85.7%       100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  3.\_\_\_Hispanic\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                    
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  4\. Economically Disadvantaged                                                                      

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        80.0%       60.0%       92.3%       100%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        80.0%       60.0%       92.3%       100%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  STATE SCORES                                                                                        

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                                                                   

  State Mean Score                                    94.1%       91.3%       87.1%       87.6%       86.3%

  At or Above Proficient                                                                              

  State Mean Score                                    94.1%       91.3%       87.1%       87.6%       86.3%

  At Advanced                                                                                         

  State Mean Score                                    NA          NA          NA          NA          NA
  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

TAKS Reading 5th

  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      2001-2002   2000-2001   1999-2000   1998-1999   1997-1998

  Testing month                                       Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.

  SCHOOL SCORES                                                                                       

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        100%        93.8%       90.2%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        100%        93.8%       90.2%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  Number of students tested                           49          38          43          39          47

  Percent of total students tested                    100%        100%        87%         91.9%       90.5%

  Number of students excluded                         0           0           6           3           5

  Percent of students excluded                        0%          0%          13%         8.1%        9.5%

  SUBGROUP SCORES                                                                                     

  1.\_\_White\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (specify                                                  
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        100%        95.7%       88.6%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        100%        95.7%       88.6%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  2.\_\_\_Black\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                   
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          100%        85.7%       NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          100%        85.7%       NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  3.\_\_\_Hispanic\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                    
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  4\. Economically Disadvantaged                                                                      

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        100%        100%        66.7%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        100%        100%        66.7%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  STATE SCORES                                                                                        

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                                                                   

  State Mean Score                                    92.7        90.2%       87.8%       86.4%       88.4%

  At or Above Proficient                                                                              

  State Mean Score                                    92.7        90.2%       87.8%       86.4%       88.4%

  At Advanced                                                                                         

  State Mean Score                                    NA          NA          NA          NA          NA
  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

TAKS Math 5th

  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                                                      2001-2002   2000-2001   1999-2000   1998-1999   1997-1998

  Testing month                                       Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.        Apr.

  SCHOOL SCORES                                                                                       

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        96.7%       100%        100%        92.7%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        96.7%       100%        100%        92.7%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  Number of students tested                           49          38          43          39          47

  Percent of total students tested                    100%        100%        87%         91.9%       90.5

  Number of students excluded                         0           0           6           3           5

  Percent of students excluded                        0%          0%          13%         8.1%        9.5%

  SUBGROUP SCORES                                                                                     

  1.\_\_White\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (specify                                                  
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        96.3%       100%        100%        91.4%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        96.3%       100%        100%        91.4%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  2.\_\_\_Black\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                   
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          100%        100%        NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          100%        100%        NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  3.\_\_\_Hispanic\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(specify                                                    
  subgroup)                                                                                           

  At or Above Basic                                   NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At or Above Proficient                              NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  4\. Economically Disadvantaged                                                                      

  At or Above Basic                                   100%        100%        100%        100%        66.7%

  At or Above Proficient                              100%        100%        100%        100%        66.7%

  At Advanced                                         NA          NA          NA          NA          NA

  STATE SCORES                                                                                        

  Total                                                                                               

  At or Above Basic                                                                                   

  State Mean Score                                    96.2%       94.6%       92.1%       90.1%       89.6%

  At or Above Proficient                                                                              

  State Mean Score                                    96.2%       94.6%       92.1%       90.1%       89.6%

  At Advanced                                                                                         

  State Mean Score                                    NA          NA          NA          NA          NA
  --------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------