**Announcement for Proposals, 2005-2**

**Joint Fire Science Program**

**[U.S. Department of the Interior]{.underline}**

**Bureau of Indian Affairs**

**Bureau of Land Management**

**National Park Service**

**U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service**

**U.S. Geological Survey**

**[U.S. Department of Agriculture]{.underline}**

**Forest Service**

**Opens October 15, 2004**

**Closes December 15, 2004**

This Announcement for Proposals includes one Task Statement on Local
Research Needs.

**Announcement for Proposals**

by the

Joint Fire Science Program

**A. Program Description**

The Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) is a partnership of six federal
wildland management and research agencies with a need to address
problems associated with managing accumulating wildland fuels, fire
regimes, and fire-impacted ecosystems on lands administered by the
partner agencies. The partner agencies include the USDA Forest Service
and five bureaus in the Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian
Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey). For the purpose of
this Announcement for Proposals (AFP), \"wildland fuels\" are considered
to be living and dead plant material associated with forests, woodlands,
shrublands, grasslands, wetlands, and riparian areas.

Wildland fuels have been accumulating during at least the past
half-century due to wildland fire management policies, wildland
management practices, and other factors. As demonstrated in recent
years, the additional fuels contribute to intense fire behavior and
increase the resistance of fires to control. Consequently, property and
natural resources have been destroyed, costs of fire management have
escalated, fire dependent ecosystems have deteriorated, and the risks to
human life and property continue to escalate.

Congress, agency administrators, JFSP partners, and others have
recognized that the accumulation of wildland fuels must be reduced in
order to reduce the human threat from fire and maintain natural resource
values. Congress directed the Department of the Interior and the USDA
Forest Service to develop a Joint Fire Science Plan to provide
science-based support to land management agencies as they address this
need. The JFSP was established with the 1998 Appropriation for Interior
and Related Agencies to help ensure that cooperating Federal land
management agencies expedite scientifically sound, efficient,
systematic, and effective solutions and monitoring programs that cross
agency jurisdictions and fuel types.

The 1998 Joint Fire Science Plan addressed four issues (Principal
Purposes) critical to the success of the fuels management and fire use
programs. These included wildland fuels inventory and mapping,
evaluation of fuels treatments, scheduling of fuels treatments, and
monitoring and evaluation. Congress included additional direction in the
2001 Appropriation for Interior and Related Agencies. In addition to the
four original Principal Purposes, the JFSP was directed to focus
attention on issues such as protocols for evaluating post fire
stabilization and rehabilitation projects, aircraft based remote
sensing, and regional/local issues.

For further background on the goals of the JFSP, those considering
submitting proposals and other interested parties are encouraged to
review the Joint Fire Science Plan, which is available via the Internet
at: [http://jfsp.nifc.gov](http://jfsp.nifc.gov/). The JFSP has issued
AFPs in June 1998, February 1999, February 2000, February 2001, October
2002, and October 2003 and subsequently selected and funded more than
250 projects. Previous AFPs and lists of funded projects can be found on
the program web site.

This AFP contains two Task Statements for which proposals are sought.
The JFSP encourages proposals from all interested parties. However,
because the focus of the JFSP is on wildland fire and fuels issues on
Federal wildlands, evidence of direct involvement by Federal scientists
or land managers in the development of proposals [must]{.underline} be
included in all proposals**. Proposals that do not have evidence of
direct involvement by federal land managers or scientists will not be
considered for funding.** Examples of documented involvement by land
managers or scientists include participation as a Principal
Investigator, cooperator, or collaborator; letters of commitment and
support; and written evidence from the manager that the proposal is
responding to an urgent fire or fuels problem related to the land
manager's unit.

**All proposals must include the following items to be considered. The
JFSP program office must receive the complete proposal package
(including all items in the following checklist) by close of business
(5:00 pm MST) December 15, 2004. There will be no exceptions to this
closing date. Incomplete proposals will not be considered.**

**Facsimile or e-mailed proposals will not be accepted.**

1.  One original and five copies of complete proposal packet including
    all material.

2.  An electronic version on a compact disk (in MS Word or pdf format)
    must be included.

3.  Signature and complete address including phone number, mailing
    address, surface mail address (if different than mail address) and
    e-mail address of principal investigator, Federal cooperator or land
    manager as appropriate, point of contact, and appropriate Federal
    Fiscal Representative (see definition).

4.  Letters of support are not required but are considered in the peer
    review process. However, all letters of support must be included
    with the hard copy proposal package and received by the due date.
    Each letter must clearly state the title of the project and the
    principal investigator of the proposed work.

Questions and proposals should be directed to:

Dr. Erik Berg

Program Manager

Joint Fire Science Program

National Interagency Fire Center

3833 S. Development Ave.

Boise ID 83705

phone (208) 387-5349

email: Erik_Berg@nifc.blm.gov

**B. Area of Interest for Proposals**

This AFP may contain more than one Task Statement. Proposals will be
sought for each of the tasks. Proposals submitted should clearly state
which Task Statement is being addressed.

**Task 1:** ***Proposals are sought to directly address locally
important knowledge or data gaps associated with planning and
implementation of wildland fire, fuels treatment, or post-fire treatment
actions (including post-fire salvage logging) that are specifically
identified by an agency administrator (see definition section F).***

Local land managers often have limited ability to develop and implement
research projects or administrative studies because of the lack of
specific research expertise, specialized equipment, or laboratory
facilities, or because of workload commitments. However, such projects
can provide extremely valuable information on local treatment effects to
guide wildland fire management, fuels treatment, or post-fire treatment
actions. These site-specific projects may include biological, social,
cultural, or physical effects of fires, fuel treatments, or post-fire
activities. Whether described as "research projects" or "administrative
studies," proposed projects must be of high quality, defensible,
replicated as appropriate, and subject to peer review. Land managers are
encouraged to partner with the research community to develop and
implement the proposed work. **Proposals must clearly demonstrate that
need for the proposed work originated from an agency administrator(s).**
Funding may be approved by the JFSP Governing Board to include the
development of a demonstration site when required as a part of science
delivery and application (technology transfer).

All proposals responding to this task statement must contain a specific
problem statement, not to exceed one page, which forms the basis for
presenting the issue(s) to be addressed in the proposed work. **The
problem statement must be written and signed by the agency administrator
(see Section F, Definitions) and include the phone number of that
official. Proposals that do not contain the required problem statement
and agency administrator signature will not be considered.**

The Governing Board anticipates that these projects can be accomplished
within three years or less. The Governing Board does not anticipate
funding projects that are or should be internally funded from existing
accounts (such as routine agency monitoring) or operational portions
(such as the installation of fuels treatments or development of Fire
Management Plans) of other projects.

**C. Format for Proposals**

**Overview of the Proposal Format**

The full proposal should specify rationale, objectives, methodologies,
and deliverables in sufficient detail to allow an informed reader to
assess the proposal\'s validity in addressing one of the Task Statements
in the AFP. The proposal should also identify criteria by which success
of the project can be determined. The proposal text and accompanying
tables and figures, exclusive of curricula vitae or other appended
information, should be limited to 12 pages. Please use at least 11-point
font. Complete annual and total budgets and a firm timeline for
deliverables must be included, as well as a mechanism for technology
transfer to appropriate end users. The proposal also provides a record
of management responsibility and accountability for various aspects of
the project.

**Title Page**

The following format should be used for the title page (not to exceed 1
page):

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Project Title:                                                        |
|                                                                       |
| Announcement for Proposals and task statement this proposal is        |
| responding to:                                                        |
|                                                                       |
| Principal Investigator(s):                                            |
|                                                                       |
| Affiliation:                                                          |
|                                                                       |
| Address:                                                              |
|                                                                       |
| Telephone/Facsimile Number(s):                                        |
|                                                                       |
| E-mail:                                                               |
|                                                                       |
| Point of Contact (This person will be the one contacted by the        |
| program office with all correspondence on this project. Please        |
| include full mail and e-mail address as well as phone number):        |
|                                                                       |
| Federal Cooperator (please include full mail and e-mail address as    |
| well as phone number):                                                |
|                                                                       |
| Duration of Project:                                                  |
|                                                                       |
| Annual Funding Requested from the Joint Fire Science Program:         |
|                                                                       |
| Total Funding Requested from the Joint Fire Science Program:          |
|                                                                       |
| ***Total Value of In-Kind and Financial Contributions:***             |
|                                                                       |
| Abstract: Summarize the proposed project in a brief abstract not to   |
| exceed ½ page. The abstract should include the justification for the  |
| proposed project in relation to one or more task statements in the    |
| AFP, objectives, appropriate methodology, and applicability of        |
| results.                                                              |
|                                                                       |
| Signature of PI                                                       |
| \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\                                                   |
| _\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ |
| Date:                                                                 |
|                                                                       |
| Signature of Federal Cooperator:                                      |
| \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Date:    |
|                                                                       |
| Signature of Federal Fiscal                                           |
|                                                                       |
| Representative (see definition):                                      |
| \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Date:                    |
|                                                                       |
| (The Federal Fiscal Representative will be responsible for receiving  |
| funding if the proposal is successful. Signature by the Federal       |
| Fiscal Representative also indicates that the federal grants and      |
| agreements specialist has reviewed and concurs with the terms of the  |
| proposal).                                                            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

**Problem Statement**

**The AFP requires a problem statement written and signed by the agency
administrator (see Section F, Definitions) and includes the phone number
of that official. Proposals that do not contain the required problem
statement and agency administrator signature will not be considered.**

**Introduction**

An introductory section should include:

1\) Project Justification. A summary of the issue(s), why the project
needs to be done (relevance to Task Statement(s) in the AFP), and
benefits derived.

2\) Project Objectives. A statement of the project objective(s) must be
clearly stated and measurable. This should include a brief statement of
the hypothesis to be tested (if applicable), what information or
product(s) will be provided at the end of the project, and how the
information or product(s) can be used to resolve the issue(s) stated in
the Task Statement(s).

3\) Background. This section includes a concise review and synthesis of
existing knowledge and previous research or other pertinent background
information in the project task area, a description of how the proposed
project adds to or improves existing knowledge or tools, and a
description of coordination with other relevant ongoing or completed
products to ensure cross-compatibility and eliminate redundancy.

The introductory section is intended to provide peer reviewers and the
Governing Board with evidence that the proposed work demonstrates new or
significantly builds on previous and on-going work. Proposals should
also describe how the work responds to task statements in the AFP.
Although the literature may be extensive, the synthesis should generally
include reference to no more than 15-20 of the most important and/or
most relevant sources.

**Materials and Methods**

This section should describe procedures proposed for conducting the
project in sufficient detail that a knowledgeable reviewer could
understand the process and that a peer could replicate the proposed
work.

This section should resemble an **abbreviated** methods section
typically found in research study plans or scientific peer-reviewed
journal articles. At a minimum, methods should **succinctly** identify
the following if applicable or appropriate:

-   A description of the study sites.

-   Materials to be used to conduct the investigation.

-   Experimental design- both treatment and design structures.

-   Response variables and tentative independent variables or
    covariates.

-   Sample design- including procedures for sub-sampling.

-   The experimental unit(s) for statistical analysis.

-   Tentative statistical analysis procedures.

**Project Duration**

Proposals will generally not be approved for longer than three years
unless otherwise specified in the task statement. Proposals must clearly
state how research activities, including the final report and
deliverables, can be completed within the project term.

**Budget**

Proposed project budgets can be complex, often involving multiple
agencies or units in association with non-Federal units. Proposers
should ensure that appropriate Federal Fiscal Representative (see
definition), as well as budget or grants and contract offices of
non-federal cooperators, review the proposal prior to submission to
ensure that the budget and other fiscal aspects of the proposal meet
agency requirements. Concurrence, signature, and contact information of
the Federal Fiscal Representative is required. Both the fiscal
representative and the grants and agreements specialist or contracting
office must be involved if the development of the budget if a portion of
the work will be subcontracted or sub-granted. **Signature by the
Federal Fiscal Representative also indicates that the federal grants and
agreements specialist has reviewed and concurs with the terms of the
proposal**.

The proposed budget should be sufficiently detailed to identify direct
and indirect costs and related surcharges, to separate labor costs from
operational costs, and to identify salaries associated with funded
scientists. Contributed costs and the source of those costs should be
included in the budget. Annual and total costs should be specified.
Separate line items for \"capitalized\" equipment (more than \$5000)
should be included. Out-year projections should be included for
multi-year proposals. Proposed budgets should include travel expenses
for one PI to participate in an annual 3-day PI workshop. The Governing
Board of the Joint Fire Science Program reserves the right to negotiate
budget amounts and deliverables with proposing organizations. Stipends
are normally funded, but tuition fees are not.

Agreement funding is typically not available until late summer or early
fall following selection and funding approval decision by the Governing
Board.

**Indirect Costs**

The JFSP Governing Board recognizes the need of agencies and
organizations participating in the program to recover reasonable
indirect overhead costs. However, cost effectiveness of the individual
projects is clearly a determining factor in the final selection process
of the proposals that will be awarded funding. The JFSP is limited
within its authorization regarding the amount of the indirect cost rate
that will be approved. The standard maximum indirect rate is twenty (20)
percent of that portion of the recipient Federal agency's cost
attributable to the project. The standard maximum indirect rate that a
Federal agency may charge for flow-through/pass-through indirect costs
when a major portion of the project is subcontracted or sub-granted is
ten (10) percent. Proposals that are submitted and applicable to the
Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Units (CESU) criteria should abide by the
established CESU indirect rates, which are currently capped at Seventeen
and one-half (17.5) percent.

**Salary Policy**

Normally, salaries of permanent full-time Federal employees are expected
to be provided by their agencies. This is also true of university
faculty on 12-month tenure-track appointments. These employees are
already fully funded by their institutions. However, the Governing Board
recognizes there can be mitigating circumstances arising from the need
to fill in behind these employees when they are reassigned to Joint Fire
Science Program funded activities. In such cases, the Governing Board
may agree to fund salaries of permanent employees. However, a brief
justification must be included in the proposal. The justification must
be certified by an appropriate institutional authority, other than the
PI or other cooperator on the proposal, at the employee's organization
or institution. The format included in this AFP below must be used for
the certification. In addition, permanent employee salary costs must be
explicitly identified in the project budget. The Governing Board
requires no special justification (other than a brief description of the
need for the position in the budget justification section of the
proposal) for funding temporary or term employees, post-doctoral
employees, graduate, or undergraduate students. Stipends are normally
funded, but tuition fees are not.

**Science Delivery and Application**

Investments in wildland fire science need to be accompanied by an
emphasis on science interpretation and delivery. Program success will
not be measured by how many research projects are funded or how many
research papers are generated, but how critical information from
research efforts is successfully conveyed to resource managers and end
users with the expressed purpose of improving management decisions.
Therefore, it is imperative that each proposal include a description of
how results and products will be effectively transferred to field
managers and other end users in a useful form. A combination of passive
(e.g., published papers, CDs, websites) and active (e.g., field tours,
workshops, and training sessions) methods are preferred. Those proposals
utilizing a variety of methods and approaches to accomplish this
function will receive higher ratings. Project descriptions and
deliverables must be available on the Internet.

**Deliverables**

Deliverables include final reports, published articles, data, results,
software, tools, and other information or products developed during the
proposed research project. Proposals [must]{.underline} provide specific
details on deliverables that will be provided by the proposed work,
along with realistic delivery dates. Submit information about
deliverables using the following table or similar format.

  ------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------
  Deliverable   Description                             Delivery Date(s)

                                                        

                                                        
  ------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------

Annual progress summaries are required and must be submitted to the JFSP
office by February 15 each year. A final report must be delivered to the
program office by the project termination date that includes:

-   A statement of how the deliverables listed in the proposal match
    what has actually been produced.

-   Copies of all completed deliverables and a timeline of additional
    deliverables not yet completed

-   It is expected that all final products will include an electronic
    version suitable for distribution, posting, etc. Descriptions in
    English units, with metric equivalents in parenthesis, are required.

-   A brief summary of what was learned from the investigation,
    including how the research met the objectives stated in the
    proposal.

**Qualifications of Investigators**

Include Curriculum Vitae for at least one PI and at least one Federal
agency manager or research collaborator. These should reflect recent,
relevant experience and publication(s) and should not exceed 2 pages.
Brief summaries of co-PIs should be included as appropriate.

**D. Checklist of required items**

**Facsimile or e-mailed proposals will not be accepted.**

**Checklist of items that must be included in Proposal Submissions:**

 One original and five copies of complete proposal packet including all
material.

-   An electronic version on a compact disk (in MS Word or pdf format)
    must be submitted with the packet.

-   Problem statement written and signed by agency administrator.

-   Federal cooperator or land manager (if different than the PI) as
    appropriate (see definitions of Federal cooperator and land
    manager), and a concurrence signature and contact information of the
    appropriate Federal Administrative or Contracting Officer.

 Signature and complete address including phone number, mailing
address, surface mail address (if different than mail address) and
e-mail address of the principal investigator, Federal cooperator or land
manager as appropriate, and Federal Fiscal Representative (see
definition).

 Letters of support are considered in the review process but are not
required. However, letters of support must be included with the proposal
package. Letters must include the title and principal investigator of
the project.

 An introduction or background section that includes the specific
objectives of the project, and describes how the proposed work is
relevant to the Task Statement in the AFP.

 A brief review and synthesis of related past and current literature
and work.

 A first year and total budget, including identification of salaries
and indirect costs.

 Include a "Justification of Need for Salary Support," approved by
appropriate authority, as necessary.

 A list of deliverables with dates of delivery.

 A science delivery and application mechanism as described in the
science delivery section of this AFP.

-   A list of cooperators and their proposed contribution.

 A Curriculum Vitae or other description of credentials of the PI and
co-investigator(s) that are signatories which demonstrates ability to
complete the proposed work.

**E. Review and Evaluation**

Reviews and evaluations of proposals submitted in response to this AFP
to the Joint Fire Science Program will focus on the following five
factors:

• Relevancy

• Scientific Methods and Study Design

• Products and Delivery into Application

• Collaboration and Leverage

• Administrative Adequacy

Criteria associated with the factors include:

Relevancy:

1\. Does the proposal address the Task Statement in the AFP?

2\. How relevant is the proposed work to field level personnel?

3\. Does the Project Justification adequately describe why the project
needs to be done?

4\. Is there evidence that land managers need the proposed work?

5\. Does this proposal demonstrate new or significant contributions to
existing knowledge bases?

Scientific Methods and Study Design (if applicable or appropriate):

1.  Are the questions, objectives, or hypotheses well-formed and clearly
    stated?

2.  Are study approaches appropriate and adequate to meet stated
    objectives?

3.  Is the design statistically sound? (i.e. Can hypotheses or questions
    be answered with the proposed design? Does the design provide for
    sufficient statistical power?)

4.  Do proposed administrative studies or demonstrations lay out the
    desired outcome and a series of steps (methods) that will lead to
    that outcome?

5.  What are the qualifications of the team to do the proposed work?

6.  If the proposal involves software development, does it include
    beta-testing and is there evidence that the proposal addresses
    agency system architecture and security requirements?

Products and Delivery into Application

> 1\. Does the proposal provide for adequate transfer of information or
> products?
>
> 2\. Does the proposal compliment or strengthen other research in this
> field? If so, how will efforts from this proposed work be coordinated
> with other research in this area?
>
> 3\. At what scale will the proposed work provide information or
> products? Are the products useful across agency jurisdictions, fuel
> types, and geographic areas?
>
> 4\. Does the delivery method facilitate and enhance the utility of the
> scientific information for management application?
>
> 5\. Does the delivery use a combination of passive and active science
> application and delivery methods?
>
> 6\. Will the final product(s) stand alone and be complete or need
> further work or development to be useful?

Collaboration - Leverage:

1.  Does the proposal provide for adequate collaboration among agencies,
    fire and land management personnel, research scientists, and other
    collaborators?

2.  Does the proposal ensure broad integration among disciplines; build
    on existing knowledge or ongoing studies?

3.  Will results and recommendations be applicable to a variety of
    agencies and organizations?

4.  Is there evidence of local or regional agency support and
    involvement in the proposal?

5.  Are the in-kind contributions reasonable and adequate?

Administrative Adequacy:

1.  Does the proposal follow the requested format and include all the
    requested information?

2.  Are adequate institutional resources and support available?

3.  Based on the design and the track record of the
    investigators/participants, what is the likelihood of success?

4.  Is the proposed work cost effective?

5.  If formal cooperative arrangements are proposed (e.g., with
    universities or other non-federal organizations), is there
    documentation that these will be feasible and agreeable to the
    cooperators?

6.  Does the proposal address compliance with the National Environmental
    Policy Act, Threatened/Endangered Species Act, or similar statutes?

7.  Are proposed timeframes and budgets reasonable and adequately
    justified, including funding for sub-agreements? Is adequate time
    allocated to complete the study? Is a justification for salaries
    included and adequate if necessary?

8.  Is the problem statement written and signed by an Agency
    Administrator?

**F. Definitions**

**Agency Administrator:** The agency Administrator is the official
responsible for administering policy on an area of public land who has
full authority for making decisions and providing direction. Also known
as \"Agency Line Officer," "Line Officer," and "Land Manager." Examples
include Park Superintendent, Forest Supervisor, District Manager, Refuge
Manager, District Ranger, and Field Office Manager. Research line
officers are not included for the purpose of this AFP.

**Announcement for Proposals (or AFP):** Joint Fire Science Program
method of requesting proposals. Announcements for Proposals include Task
Statements for which proposals are sought, instructions for proposal
submission, and related information.

**Federal Fiscal Representative**: The individual attached to the
Federal proposers or Federal cooperator's unit who will be responsible
for the administrative and fiscal aspects of the proposed work. This
person will be responsible for receiving funding if the proposal is
successful. This individual is typically an Administrative Officer,
Contracting Officer, or Grants and Agreements Specialist.

**Federal Cooperator:** Representative of a Joint Fire Science Program
partner agency.

**Indirect Costs:** Those costs that are a percentage of the
overhead/administrative costs attributable to a specific research
project. Examples include the cost of operations and maintenance such as
janitorial, phone, and clerical services. The Joint Fire Science Program
recognizes two types of indirect costs: "in-house" costs incurred by the
agency, institution, or unit completing the research, and "pass-through"
costs associated with passing funds to another agency, institution, or
unit for the purpose of completing research.

**Joint Fire Science Program Governing Board:** An appointed, 10-person
board, representing the JFSP partners, that manages the JFSP. The Board
drafts and posts Announcements for Proposals, selects proposals for
funding, supervises the JFSP Manager and program office, and conducts
related business.

**Joint Fire Science Program PI Workshop:** Annual workshop, typically
in the Spring, in which PIs of JFSP-funded projects provide progress
reports, discuss research-related issues, and conduct other business.

**Land Manager:** see Agency Administrator

**Principal Investigator (or PI):** The individual identified in a
proposal who is primarily responsible for completing a research project.
This person will be the main technical contact for the JFSP Office.

**Problem Statement or Statement of Need:** A brief statement, written
and signed by the agency administrator, which clearly describes the need
for the proposed work and how the proposed work would resolve the issue.
The statement also includes the agency administrator's commitment to
supporting the proposed work. The problem statement is typically one
page or less.

**Science Delivery and Application:** The transfer of information,
materials, models and other research deliverables to end users, along
with adequate information and training to apply the deliverables.
Examples of active methods include workshops, training sessions, guided
field tours, conferences, meetings, and symposia. Examples of passive
methods include published papers and websites. A combination of active
and passive methods is preferred.

**Task Statement:** A specific area of interest, identified in an
Announcement for Proposals, for which proposals are sought.

**Certification to the Joint Fire Science Program**

**Justification of Need for Salary Support**

I hereby certify the attached Justification of Need to provide temporary
salaries for full-time permanent employee
(s)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_*(list name of
employee(s))* is necessary and appropriate to enable him/her (them) to
fully and directly participate in the proposed project.

Justification:

I understand that salary funding for this/these employee(s) directly
involved in the proposed project is temporary and will not be provided
beyond the duration of the proposed project.

Signature\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Name (type or print)
[\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}

Title
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Phone Number \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_