The Criminal Division

![](media/image1.png){width="7.016666666666667in"
height="3.7680555555555557in"}

FY 2009

Congressional

Budget

#  

# Table of Contents

Page No.

**I. Overview** 1

**II Summary of Program Changes** 8

**III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language**
9

IV\. Decision Unit Justification

A. Enforcing Federal Criminal Laws 10

1\. Program Description

2\. Performance Tables

3\. Performance, Resources, and Strategies

a\. Performance Plan and Report of Outcomes

b\. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes

c\. Results of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews

**V. E-Gov Initiatives** 22

**VI. Exhibits**

A.  Organizational Chart A

> B. Summary of Requirements B
>
> C. Program Increases by Decision Unit C

D.  Resources by DOJ Strategic Goal/Objective D

E.  Justification for Base Adjustments E

F.  Crosswalk of 2007 Availability F

G.  Crosswalk of 2008 Availability G

H.  Summary of Reimbursable Resources H

I.  Detail of Permanent Positions by Category I

J.  Financial Analysis of Program Increases/Offsets J

K.  Summary of Requirements by Grade K

L.  Summary of Requirements by Object Class L

**I. Overview for the Criminal Division**

**A. FY 2009 Budget Summary**

The Criminal Division requests a total of 746 permanent positions, 751
direct Full-Time Equivalents (FTE), and \$164,061,000 in its Salaries
and Expenses appropriation for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009. The Division\'s
total requested program improvements for FY 2009 (2 attorney positions,
1 FTE, and \$289,000) will enable the Division's continued support of
the Department's Strategic Goal Two: Prevent Crime, Enforce Federal
Laws, and Represent the Rights and Interests of the People.

Electronic copies of the Department of Justice's Congressional Budget
Justifications and Capital Asset Plan and Business Case exhibits can be
viewed or downloaded from the Internet using the Internet address:
<http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/2009justification>

**B. Criminal Division Mission & Program Activities**

The Criminal Division develops, enforces, and supervises the application
of all federal criminal laws (except those specifically assigned to
other divisions). The Division performs four key program activities to
fulfill its mission, through which it provides **leadership** and
**coordination** in the Department's efforts to meet its strategic
goals:

-   **Litigating** cases (i.e. multi-jurisdictional & international
    cases);

-   Providing **expert guidance and legal advice** (i.e. to the Attorney
    General, foreign counterparts, federal, state, and local law
    enforcement agencies, and U.S. Attorneys' offices);

-   Reviewing and implementing **law enforcement tools** (i.e. Title III
    wiretaps, attorney fee forfeitures, correspondent banking subpoenas,
    and foreign legal frameworks); and

-   Fostering and maintaining **global partnerships** (cross-cuts all
    activities)**.**

The Criminal Division is requesting new investments to sustain and
improve its support of the Department's top priority to reduce violent
and organized crime, especially at the Southwest Border. If our request
for additional positions in this critical area is funded, the resources
will be well-spent and the impact will be felt well beyond the District
of Columbia.

**C. The Criminal Division's Role in Achieving Outcomes**

The Criminal Division supports and plays a substantial role in helping
the Department to meet its targets for Strategic Goals 1 and 2,
especially in the transnational arena. The Division has a wealth of
experience in litigating and coordinating investigations and cases
across borders, whether through domestic or international partnerships.
Therefore, the Criminal Division stands at the forefront in identifying
emerging national and transnational crime trends. We also play a leading
role in developing and implementing global enforcement strategies and
policy to combat these emerging criminal trends. Through its work and
expertise, the Division focuses on national and transnational criminal
enforcement, a focus that no other litigating component in the Justice
Department shares.

The Division has identified five priority areas to ensure that the
Division is effectively addressing the country's most critical justice
needs on the national and transnational fronts:

-   Supporting the National Security Mission

-   Ensuring the Integrity of Government

-   Reducing Violent and Organized Crime

-   Protecting Children from Sexual Predators

-   Safeguarding and Maintaining Confidence in our Marketplace

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **KEEPING AMERICA SAFE:**                                             |
|                                                                       |
| **An Example of the Criminal Division's Role in**                     |
|                                                                       |
| **Protecting Children from Sexual Predators**                         |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|         On April 5, 2007, a federal jury in Miami found resident Kent |
| Frank guilty of eight counts of child exploitation offenses related   |
| to his sexual abuse of three young females in Cambodia.  He was       |
| sentenced to 40 years in prison on sex tourism and child pornography  |
| charges. He was also ordered to pay a \$25,000 fine and serve 15      |
| years of supervised release. Frank was convicted of four counts of    |
| traveling in foreign commerce and engaging in illicit sexual conduct  |
| with a minor.  The jury also found Frank guilty of three counts of    |
| purchasing a minor with the intent to produce child pornography and   |
| one count of traveling in foreign commerce for the purpose of         |
| engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor. The prosecution      |
| stemmed from the Jan. 1, 2004, arrest of Frank in Phnom Penh,         |
| Cambodia, by the Cambodian National Police (CNP), on debauchery       |
| charges.  The case was jointly prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's      |
| Office of the Southern District of Florida and the Criminal           |
| Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section.                  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

The activities of the Division are unique and varied. The Division
investigates, disrupts, and prevents criminal activity; argues legal
matters before the court; supervises the use of critical law enforcement
tools; leverages and maintains global partnerships; coordinates
multi-jurisdictional investigations and prosecutions; and provides
training and consultation to U.S. Attorneys, as well as local, state,
and foreign officials. No single U.S. Attorney's Office can accomplish
these duties and responsibilities that make up the Division's daily
operations. The Criminal Division's limited, but powerful, resources
have been focused through the five priority areas listed above. The
efforts of the Criminal Division help safeguard the lives and liberties
of Americans and all who enjoy the freedoms that are the hallmarks of
our society.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **KEEPING AMERICA SAFE:**                                             |
|                                                                       |
| **Examples of the Criminal Division's Role in**                       |
|                                                                       |
| **Supporting the National Security Mission**                          |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| In 2006, the Division obtained a favorable extradition decision from  |
| the Czech court of a defendant (Oussama Kassir) wanted in the         |
| Southern District of New York for conspiring to establish and         |
| attempting to establish a jihad training camp in Oregon. In addition, |
| the defendant is charged with establishing and operating numerous     |
| terrorist websites on the internet that instigated, assisted, and     |
| prepared individuals to commit large-scale terrorist acts and         |
| provided instructions for building bombs. The defendant is currently  |
| appealing the court's decision.                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Examples of how the Division works to achieve outcomes in each priority
area, through the four program activities enumerated previously, are
described in the following table.

+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| **Division  | *           | **Expert    | **Law       | **Global    |
| Priority**  | *Litigating | Guidance &  | Enforcement | Partnership |
|             | &           | Advice      | Tool        | A           |
|             | In          | A           | A           | ctivities** |
|             | vestigating | ctivities** | ctivities** |             |
|             | A           |             |             |             |
|             | ctivities** |             |             |             |
+=============+=============+=============+=============+=============+
| **Tr        | -   C       | -           | -           | -   Direct  |
| ansnational | oordination |   Knowledge |   Obtaining |             |
| Criminal    |     of      |     sharing |             |   technical |
| En          |             |     through |    evidence |             |
| forcement** |  bi-lateral |             |     from or |  assistance |
|             |     inv     |  bi-lateral |     for     |     on      |
| *           | estigations |     working |     foreign |     ca      |
| Identifying |             |     groups  |             | se-specific |
| emerging    | -   P       |             |   countries |     matters |
| c           | rosecutions | -           |             |             |
| ross-border |     between |    Training | -           | -   Pa      |
| crime       |     the     |     of      |  Supporting | rticipating |
| trends and  |     U.S.    |     foreign |     tra     |     in      |
| developing  |     and     |     c       | ns-national |     in      |
| and         |     foreign | ounterparts |     cases   | ternational |
| i           |             |             |             |     policy  |
| mplementing | governments |             |             |     groups  |
| global      |             |             |             |             |
| enforcement |             |             |             |             |
| strategies* |             |             |             |             |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| *           | -           | -   Pa      | -           | -   St      |
| *Supporting | Prosecuting | rticipating | Negotiating | rengthening |
| the         |     cases   |     in      |     Mutual  |     counte  |
| National    |     to      |     gove    |     Legal   | r-terrorism |
| Security    |     deter   | rnment-wide |             |     ability |
| Mission**   |             |     ant     |  Assistance |     of      |
|             |  corruption | i-terrorism |             |     foreign |
| *Catching   |     of      |             |    Treaties |     c       |
| potential   |     foreign |    strategy |     to      | ounterparts |
| terrorists  |             |     groups  |     obtain  |             |
| before they |   officials |             |     foreign | -   Working |
| attack by   |             | -           |             |     with    |
| prosecuting | -           |   Providing |    evidence |     other   |
| them for    |  Supporting |             |             |             |
| their use   |     inv     |   expertise | -           |   countries |
| of          | estigations |     on      |    Securing |     to      |
| traditional |     to      |             |             |     disrupt |
| criminal    |     limit   |    freezing | extradition |             |
| methods in  |             |             |     of      |   terrorist |
| their       |   terrorist |   terrorist |             |     travel  |
| schemes*    |             |     assets  |   terrorist |             |
|             |    mobility |             |             |    networks |
|             |             |             |    suspects |             |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| **Ensuring  | -           | -           | -   Using   | -           |
| the         | Prosecuting |   Providing |     asset   |    Training |
| Integrity   |     cases   |             |             |     foreign |
| of          |     where   |  assistance |  forfeiture |     states  |
| G           |     USAOs   |     in      |     tools   |     in      |
| overnment** |     are     |             |     to take |     anti    |
|             |             |   sensitive |     back    | -corruption |
| *Ensuring   |   precluded |     cases   |             |     tactics |
| fair and    |             |             |  ill-gotten |             |
| uniform     | -   In      | -           |             | -           |
| treatment   | vestigating |    Ensuring |    proceeds |    Securing |
| of          |             |             |             |     good    |
| sensitive   |   pervasive |    election | -           |     will by |
| public      |             |     crime   |   Providing |             |
| corruption  |  corruption |     matters |             |    applying |
| inv         |             |     are     |   oversight |     same    |
| estigations |             |     handled |     to      |             |
| to buoy     |             |             |             |   standards |
| citizen     |             |   uniformly |   sensitive |     to U.S. |
| trust in    |             |             |             |             |
| officials*  |             |             |  operations |   officials |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| **Reducing  | -           | -           | -           | -           |
| Violent &   | Prosecuting |    Training |   Providing |   Improving |
| Organized   |     preced  |     USAOs   |             |             |
| Crime**     | ent-setting |     on      |   oversight |   relations |
|             |     cases   |             |     of the  |     with    |
| *Performing |             | effectively |     use of  |             |
| critical    | -   C       |     using   |             |   countries |
| c           | oordinating |     the law |  electronic |     that    |
| oordinating |     tr      |     to      |     s       |     h       |
| functions   | ansnational |             | urveillance | istorically |
| in the      |             |   prosecute |             |     harbor  |
| fight to    |  operations |     gangs   | -           |     gang    |
| reduce the  |     on      |             |    Enabling |     leaders |
| threat of   |     violent | -   Working |             |     and     |
| violence in |     gangs   |     to      |  protection |     violent |
| c           |             |     create  |     of      |             |
| ommunities* |             |     a       |             |   criminals |
|             |             |             |   witnesses |             |
|             |             | coordinated |             |             |
|             |             |     global  |             |             |
|             |             |             |             |             |
|             |             |    approach |             |             |
|             |             |     to      |             |             |
|             |             |             |             |             |
|             |             |    fighting |             |             |
|             |             |     gangs   |             |             |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| *           | -           | -           | -   Running | -   Working |
| *Protecting | Prosecuting |    Training |     a       |     to form |
| Children    |     h       |     PSC     |             |     in      |
| from Sexual | igh-profile |     field   |   high-tech | ternational |
| Predators** |     and     |     units   |     lab to  |             |
|             |             |     in      |     assist  |  strategies |
| *Employing  |   dangerous |             |     law     |     to      |
| co          |             | prosecution |             |     combat  |
| llaborative |    deviants |             | enforcement |     child   |
| methods to  |             |  techniques |     in      |     sexual  |
| bring our   | -   C       |             |             |     e       |
| expertise   | oordinating | -           |   gathering | xploitation |
| to every    |     PSC     |    Advising |             |             |
| n           |     inv     |     foreign |    critical | -   Working |
| eighborhood | estigations |     c       |             |     to make |
| in the      |             | ounterparts |    evidence |     child   |
| fight       |             |     on      |             |     e       |
| against     |             |             | -           | xploitation |
| sexual      |             |  conducting |  Developing |     issues  |
| predators*  |             |     complex |             |     a       |
|             |             |     inv     |  strategies |     global  |
|             |             | estigations |     to      |             |
|             |             |             |             |    priority |
|             |             |             | effectively |             |
|             |             |             |     capture |             |
|             |             |             |     digital |             |
|             |             |             |             |             |
|             |             |             |    evidence |             |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| **S         | -           | -           | -           | -   E       |
| afeguarding | Prosecuting |    Training |  Developing | stablishing |
| &           |     those   |             |             |     in      |
| Maintaining |     who     |   thousands | regulations | ternational |
| Confidence  |     attempt |     of      |     to      |     working |
| in our      |     to      |     foreign |     allow   |     groups  |
| Ma          |     defraud |             |     in      |     to      |
| rketplace** |             |   officials | vestigators |     combat  |
|             |  tax-payers |     on      |     to get  |     i       |
| *Conquering |             |             |     the     | ntellectual |
| global      | -           |   combating |             |             |
| thieves     |  Conducting |     i       |    evidence |    property |
| that        |             | ntellectual |     they    |     crimes  |
| permeate    |   sensitive |             |     need    |             |
| our         |     and     |    property |             | -           |
| economic    |     complex |     crimes  | -           |    Creating |
| infr        |     inv     |             |   Providing |     working |
| astructure* | estigations | -   Pa      |             |     re      |
|             |     against | rticipating |   oversight | lationships |
|             |     corrupt |     in      |     to      |     with    |
|             |     c       |             |     ensure  |     tr      |
|             | orporations |    national |     fair    | aditionally |
|             |             |     policy  |             |     closed  |
|             |             |     groups  | application |             |
|             |             |     to      |     of      |  countries, |
|             |             |     develop |             |             |
|             |             |     anti    |    powerful |   including |
|             |             | -corruption |     law     |     China   |
|             |             |             |             |             |
|             |             |  strategies | enforcement |             |
|             |             |             |     tools   |             |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+

**D. Challenges to Achieving Outcomes**

Many factors, both external and internal, impact the Criminal Division's
level of success and its capacity to accomplish its goals. While some of
these factors are beyond our control, the Division has always strived to
navigate these obstacles successfully to lessen the negative impact that
these factors could have on the Division's critical mission.

**[External Challenges]{.underline}**

There are many external challenges that affect the Division's ability to
achieve our goals successfully. They include the following:

1.  **Globalization of Crime**: The increasing globalization of crime
    and the emergence of transnational threats will continue to bring
    new challenges to law enforcement at home and abroad. The Criminal
    Division is committed to the ongoing fight against emerging
    transnational threats and will continue to be the Department's
    global headquarters so that the U.S. can more effectively develop
    criminal policies and legislation and monitor national and
    transnational crime trends. The Division has the experience and the
    unique capability to build global partnerships essential to
    successfully combating transnational crimes, but needs critical
    resources to keep up with increasing demand for its services.

2.  **Advances in Technology:** New technologies have generated
    cutting-edge methods for committing crimes, such as identity theft
    through the Internet and sharing child pornography real-time through
    peer-to-peer software programs. These technologies pose many
    challenges to law enforcement and prosecutors alike; it is the
    Division's job to keep up with these cutting-edge methods and to
    provide training and assistance to other prosecutors and
    investigators.

3.  **Weak International Rule of Law:** Some countries lack effective
    legislative measures, policies, laws, and judicial means to
    investigate and prosecute criminals in their countries. This creates
    problems for the Division as we try to bring these criminals to
    justice and seize their ill-gotten profits.

**[Internal Challenges]{.underline}**

The Criminal Division faces a number of internal challenges. These
include the following:

1.  **Decentralized Working Conditions**: Division personnel are
    currently located in five buildings. The Department's plan to
    consolidate all personnel into one building will require sufficient
    funding and a well-planned logistical strategy to prevent any
    disruption to operations.

2.  **Creation of Central Department Litigation Tracking System**: The
    Department's Litigation Case Management System (LCMS) will be a
    shared case management system for the Executive Office for United
    States Attorneys (EOUSA), the 94 United States Attorneys Offices
    (USAOs), and all the litigating divisions, including the Criminal
    Division. This new system will create new requirements for not only
    our IT personnel, but also for our attorney and support personnel,
    who will be required to learn new definitions and a new data entry
    system.

3.  **Information and Network Security**: To stay one-step ahead of
    criminals, the Division needs to acquire the most advanced IT
    equipment and software available. Additionally, we need to ensure
    that we are secure, not vulnerable to any cyber attacks or computer
    intrusions.

![](media/image2.wmf){width="3.375in" height="1.8930555555555555in"}**E.
Budget & Performance Integration**

This budget demonstrates how the Criminal Division's resources directly
support the achievement of the Department's strategic goals and
priorities and how the additional resources requested in this budget, if
approved, will positively impact performance -- both nationally and
internationally.

The Division reports as a single decision unit; therefore, its resources
are presented in this budget as a whole. Total costs represent both
direct and indirect costs, including administrative functions and
systems. The performance and resource table in Section IV of this budget
provides further detail on the Division's performance-based budget.

***PART Assessment Ratings Summary***

The Criminal Division was assessed through the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) along with five
other litigating components --- the Antitrust, Civil, Civil Rights,
Environment and Natural Resources, and Tax Divisions. The program
received satisfactory ratings and recommended three follow-up actions to
improve the program. The Criminal Division continues to work with the
Department to implement the follow-up actions in a timely manner. See
the *Performance, Results, and Strategies* section of this request for
more detailed information on the Division's PART progress.

> **II. Summary of Program Changes**

+--------------+--------------------------------+----+----+------+----+
| **Item       | **Description**                |    |    |      | ** |
| Name**       |                                |    |    |      | Pa |
|              |                                |    |    |      | ge |
|              |                                |    |    |      | ** |
+--------------+--------------------------------+----+----+------+----+
|              | **Goals of Requested           | ** | *  | *    |    |
|              | Enhancements**                 | Po | *F | *Dol |    |
|              |                                | s. | TE | lars |    |
|              |                                | ** | ** | (    |    |
|              |                                |    |    | \$00 |    |
|              |                                |    |    | 0)** |    |
+--------------+--------------------------------+----+----+------+----+
| **Reducing   | Neutralize the most dangerous  | *  | *  | *    | ** |
| Violent and  | members of society through the | *2 | *1 | *\$2 | 18 |
| Organized    | following strategies:          | ** | ** | 89** | ** |
| Crime**      |                                |    |    |      |    |
|              | -   Implement a comprehensive  |    |    |      |    |
|              |     gang strategy              |    |    |      |    |
|              |                                |    |    |      |    |
|              | -   Create a strategy to end   |    |    |      |    |
|              |     violence and crime related |    |    |      |    |
|              |     to the southwest border    |    |    |      |    |
+--------------+--------------------------------+----+----+------+----+

**III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language**

**Appropriations Language**

Not Applicable

**Analysis of Appropriations Language**

Not Applicable

**IV. Decision Unit Justification**

**A. Enforcing Federal Criminal Laws**

  ---------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------
  Enforcing Federal Criminal Laws    Perm. Pos. FTE        Amount (\$000)
  TOTAL                                                    

  2007 Enacted with Rescissions      744        750        \$136,829

  2007 Supplementals                 0          0          \$1,648

  2007 Enacted w/Rescissions &       744        750        \$138,477
  Supplementals                                            

  2008 Enacted                       744        750        \$148,979

  Adjustments to Base and Technical  0          0          \$14,793
  Adjustments                                              

  2009 Current Services              744        750        \$163,772

  2009 Program Increases             2          1          \$289

  2009 Request                       746        751        \$164,061

  Total Change 2008-2009                                   
  ---------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------------

1\. Program Description

The mission of the Criminal Division is to develop, enforce, and
supervise the application of all federal criminal laws except those
specifically assigned to other divisions. The Criminal Division is
situated at headquarters to work in partnership with domestic and
international law enforcement. While United States Attorneys and state
and local prosecutors serve a specific jurisdiction, the Criminal
Division addresses the need for centralized coordination, prosecution,
and oversight.

The Division complements the work of its foreign and domestic law
enforcement partners by centrally housing subject matter experts in all
areas of federal criminal law, as reflected by the 17 Sections and
Offices that make up the Division's Decision Unit "Enforcing Federal
Criminal Laws:"

> Appellate Section, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section,
> Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Computer Crime and
> Intellectual Property Section, Domestic Security Section, Executive
> Office of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, Fraud
> Section, International Criminal Investigative Training Assistance
> Program, Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section, Office of
> Administration, Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Office of
> Enforcement Operations, Office of International Affairs, Office of
> Policy and Legislation, Office of Special Investigations, Organized
> Crime and Racketeering Section, and Public Integrity Section.

The concentration of formidable expertise in a broad range of critical
subject areas strengthens and shapes the Department's efforts in
bringing a broad national perspective to areas of national and
transnational criminal enforcement and prevention. To capture this range
of expertise, the Division's Performance and Resource Table is organized
into three functional categories: litigation; expert guidance and legal
advice; and law enforcement tools.

<table>
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 10%" />
<col style="width: 14%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 10%" />
<col style="width: 9%" />
<col style="width: 9%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="12"><strong>PERFORMANCE AND RESOURCE TABLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="12">Decision Unit: Enforcing Federal Criminal Laws</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="12"><p>DOJ Strategic Goal/Objective: Goal One: Prevent
Terrorism and Promote the Nation’s Security</p>
<blockquote>
<p>1.1 Prevention, 1.2 Partnership, 1.3 Investigation/Prosecution</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Goal Two: Prevent Crime, Enforce Federal Laws, and Represent the
Rights and Interests of the People</p>
<blockquote>
<p>2.2 Violent Crime, 2.3 Crimes against Children, 2.4 Drug, 2.5
Corruption/Fraud, 2.6 Constitutional Rights</p>
</blockquote></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2"><strong>WORKLOAD/RESOURCES</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Final Target</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Actual</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Projected</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Changes</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>Requested (Total)</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td colspan="2">FY 2007</td>
<td colspan="2">FY 2007</td>
<td colspan="2"><p>FY 2008</p>
<p>Enacted</p></td>
<td colspan="2">Current Services Adjustments and FY 2009 Program
Changes</td>
<td colspan="2">FY 2009 Request</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2"><p>Total Costs and FTE</p>
<p>(reimbursable FTE are included)</p></td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>857</td>
<td>$136,829</td>
<td>893</td>
<td>$136,227</td>
<td>858</td>
<td>$148,979</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>$15,082</td>
<td>874</td>
<td>$164,061</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td><p><strong>TYPE/</strong></p>
<p><strong>Strategic Objective</strong></p></td>
<td><strong>PERFORMANCE</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>FY 2007</strong></td>
<td colspan="2"><p><mark></mark></p>
<p><strong>FY 2007</strong></p></td>
<td colspan="2"><p><mark></mark></p>
<p><strong>FY 2008 Enacted</strong></p></td>
<td colspan="2"><p><mark></mark></p>
<p><strong>Current Services Adjustments and FY 2009 Program
Changes</strong></p></td>
<td colspan="2"><strong>FY 2009 Request</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td rowspan="2">Program Activity</td>
<td rowspan="2">1. Litigation</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>370</td>
<td>$65,193</td>
<td>380</td>
<td>$64,906</td>
<td>371</td>
<td>$70,982</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>7,279</td>
<td>372</td>
<td>$78,261</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Cases Opened</td>
<td colspan="2">461</td>
<td colspan="2">546</td>
<td colspan="2">476</td>
<td colspan="2">27</td>
<td colspan="2">503</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Cases Closed</td>
<td colspan="2">316</td>
<td colspan="2">433</td>
<td colspan="2">320</td>
<td colspan="2">(9)</td>
<td colspan="2">311</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Cases Pending</td>
<td colspan="2">1,105</td>
<td colspan="2">1,102</td>
<td colspan="2">1,186</td>
<td colspan="2">191</td>
<td colspan="2">1,377</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Appellate Work - Opened</td>
<td colspan="2">4,871</td>
<td colspan="2">4,898</td>
<td colspan="2">4,715</td>
<td colspan="2">0</td>
<td colspan="2">4,715</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Appellate Work - Closed</td>
<td colspan="2">4,481</td>
<td colspan="2">4,543</td>
<td colspan="2">4,375</td>
<td colspan="2">0</td>
<td colspan="2">4,375</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Appellate Work - Pending</td>
<td colspan="2">2,198</td>
<td colspan="2">2,047</td>
<td colspan="2">2,387</td>
<td colspan="2">340</td>
<td colspan="2">2,727</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Matters Opened</td>
<td colspan="2">596</td>
<td colspan="2">857</td>
<td colspan="2">802</td>
<td colspan="2">59</td>
<td colspan="2">861</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Matters Closed</td>
<td colspan="2">470</td>
<td colspan="2">603</td>
<td colspan="2">508</td>
<td colspan="2">(7)</td>
<td colspan="2">501</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Matters Pending at EOY</td>
<td colspan="2">1,294</td>
<td colspan="2">1,391</td>
<td colspan="2">1,683</td>
<td colspan="2">360</td>
<td colspan="2">2,043</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="2">Program Activity</td>
<td rowspan="2">2. Expert Guidance and Legal Advice</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>329</td>
<td>$44,594</td>
<td>351</td>
<td>$44,398</td>
<td>329</td>
<td>$48,554</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>$4,864</td>
<td>344</td>
<td>$53,418</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Number of Legislative and Policy Analysis Matters Completed</td>
<td colspan="2">11,867</td>
<td colspan="2">18,841</td>
<td colspan="2">12,411</td>
<td colspan="2">120</td>
<td colspan="2">12,531</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Number of Programmatic Coordination Activities</td>
<td colspan="2">1,542</td>
<td colspan="2">1,962</td>
<td colspan="2">1,843</td>
<td colspan="2">88</td>
<td colspan="2">1,931</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Number of Legal Advisory Matters Completed</td>
<td colspan="2">15,900</td>
<td colspan="2">19,661</td>
<td colspan="2">13,835</td>
<td colspan="2">523</td>
<td colspan="2">14,358</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Number of Training Sessions/ Presentations</td>
<td colspan="2">2,920</td>
<td colspan="2">2,926</td>
<td colspan="2">2,157</td>
<td colspan="2">(44)</td>
<td colspan="2">2,113</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="2">Program Activity</td>
<td rowspan="2">3. Law Enforcement Tools</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$000</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>158</td>
<td>$27,042</td>
<td>162</td>
<td>$26,923</td>
<td>158</td>
<td>$29,443</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>$2,939</td>
<td>158</td>
<td>$32,382</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Workload</td>
<td>Number of Mandatory Reviews Completed</td>
<td colspan="2">22,671</td>
<td colspan="2">25,168</td>
<td colspan="2">20,758</td>
<td colspan="2">472</td>
<td colspan="2">21,230</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>EFFICIENCY MEASURE</td>
<td>Ratio of Administrative Costs to Program Costs</td>
<td colspan="2">69.60%</td>
<td colspan="2">70.40%</td>
<td colspan="2">69.90%</td>
<td colspan="2">0</td>
<td colspan="2">69.90%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>OUTCOME</td>
<td>Favorably Resolve Criminal Cases</td>
<td colspan="2">90%</td>
<td colspan="2">97%</td>
<td colspan="2">90%</td>
<td colspan="2">0</td>
<td colspan="2">90%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>OUTCOME</td>
<td>Favorably Resolve Civil Cases</td>
<td colspan="2">80%</td>
<td colspan="2">87%</td>
<td colspan="2">80%</td>
<td colspan="2">0</td>
<td colspan="2">80%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="12"><p><strong>Data Definition, Validation, Verification,
and Limitations:</strong> <strong>Definitions:</strong>
<u>Litigation:</u> This program activity includes cases or investigatory
matters in which the Criminal Division has sole or shared
responsibility. The case breakouts include cases from the following
Sections/Offices: Fraud Section, Public Integrity Section, Computer
Crimes and Intellectual Property Section, Child Exploitation and
Obscenity Section, Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, Narcotic
and Dangerous Drug Section, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering
Section, Office of Special Investigations, Domestic Security Section,
and Gang Squad Unit (beginning FY 08). <u>Appeals:</u> Appellate
Section. Data before FY 2007 included the Counterespionage and
Counterterrorism Sections, which were transferred to the National
Security Division at the conclusion of FY 2006. Data prior to FY 2008
included data from Capital Case Unit, which has been reclassified as
Expert Guidance and Legal Advice beginning FY 2008. <u>Expert Guidance
&amp; Legal Advice</u><strong>:</strong> This program activity includes
oral and written advice and training to federal, state, local and
foreign law enforcement officials; coordination and support of
investigations, prosecutions, and programs at the national,
international and multi-district levels; and oral and written analysis
of legislation and policy issues, development of legislative proposals,
advice and briefing to Departmental and external policy makers, and
participation in inter-agency policy coordination and discussions.
<u>Law Enforcement Tools:</u> This program activity includes the work
the Division does in specific areas of criminal law in reviewing and
approving the use of law enforcement tools throughout the law
enforcement community.</p>
<p><strong>Validation:</strong> In FY 2002, CRM initiated a multi-phased
workload tracking improvement initiative. To date, improvements include
definition and policy clarifications, uniform guidance and reporting,
case tracking database improvements for end user benefit, and a regular
data validation process to ensure system integrity. The Division is
currently working on improving data entry standards and the validation
of quarterly data.</p></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

  --------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
  **PERFORMANCE                                                                                                                                         
  MEASURE TABLE**                                                                                                                                       

  **Decision                                                                                                                                            
  Unit:**                                                                                                                                               
  Enforcing                                                                                                                                             
  Federal                                                                                                                                               
  Criminal Laws                                                                                                                                         

  **Performance                    **FY 2001**  **FY 2002**  **FY 2003**  **FY 2004**  **FY 2005**  **FY 2006**  **FY                      **FY 2008**  **FY 2009**
  Report and                                                                                                     2007\***                               
  Performance                                                                                                                                           
  Plan Targets**                                                                                                                                        

                                   **Actual**   **Actual**   **Actual**   **Actual**   **Actual**   **Actual**   **Target**   **Actual**   **Target**   **Target**

  **OUTCOME       Favorably        N/A          N/A          97%          94%          96%          98%          90%          97%          90%          90%
  Measure**       Resolved                                                                                                                              
                  Criminal                                                                                                                              
                  Cases\*\*                                                                                                                             

  **OUTCOME       Favorably        N/A          N/A          100%         100%         100%         90%          80%          87%          80%          80%
  Measure**       Resolve Civil                                                                                                                         
                  Cases\*\*                                                                                                                             

  **Efficiency    Ratio of         N/A          N/A          N/A          N/A          69.61%       70.27%       69.90%       70.40%       69.90%       69.90%
  Measure**       Administrative                                                                                                                        
                  Costs to Program                                                                                                                      
                  Costs                                                                                                                                 
  --------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

N/A = Data unavailable

\* Beginning Fiscal Year 2007, the workloads of the Counterterrorism and
Counterespionage Sections will not be included in the Criminal Division.

\*\* Denotes inclusion in the DOJ *Performance & Accountability Report*

3\. Performance, Resources, and Strategies

+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| **Criminal Division: |                                               |
| Enforcing Federal    |                                               |
| Criminal Laws**      |                                               |
+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| **Department         | *Strategic Goal 1: Prevent Terrorism and      |
| Goal(s)**            | Promote the Nation's Security*                |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Goal 2:* *Prevent Crime, Enforce   |
|                      | Federal Laws, and Represent the Rights and    |
|                      | Interests of the People*                      |
+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
| **Department         | *Strategic Objective 1.1: Prevent, disrupt,   |
| Objective(s)**       | and defeat terrorist operations before they   |
|                      | occur*                                        |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 1.2: Strengthen          |
|                      | partnerships to prevent, deter, and respond   |
|                      | to terrorist incidents*                       |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 1.3: Investigate and     |
|                      | prosecute those who have committed, or intend |
|                      | to commit, terrorist acts in the United       |
|                      | States*                                       |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 2.2: Reduce the threat,  |
|                      | incidence, and prevalence of violent crime*   |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 2.3: Prevent, suppress,  |
|                      | and intervene in crimes against children*     |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 2.4: Reduce the threat,  |
|                      | trafficking, use, and related violence of     |
|                      | illegal drugs*                                |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 2.5: Combat public and   |
|                      | corporate corruption, fraud, economic crime,  |
|                      | and cybercrime*                               |
|                      |                                               |
|                      | *Strategic Objective 2.6: Uphold the civil    |
|                      | and constitutional rights of all Americans*   |
+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------+

a\. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes

The Departmental long-term outcome goal for the litigating divisions,
including the Criminal Division, is the percentage of criminal and civil
cases favorably resolved in the Fiscal Year. The goals are 90 percent
(criminal) and 80 percent (civil). In FY 2006, the Division reported
that it favorably resolved 98 percent of its criminal cases and 90
percent of its civil cases. In FY 2007, the Division favorably resolved
97 percent of its criminal cases and 87 percent of its civil cases,
again exceeding our goals from a performance standpoint, the Division
has consistently exceeded the Departmental long-term outcome goal for
the litigating divisions.

*Litigation Workload*

Litigation includes complex case and investigatory matter work. Certain
litigation requires the Division's expertise for the following reasons:
it involves work of national significance, requires international
coordination, has precedent-setting implications, involves
cross-jurisdictional investigations, or requires intensive resource
needs due to the magnitude of the case. Although Counterterrorism and
Counterespionage Sections transferred to the newly created National
Security Division effective FY 2007, the Division's litigation workload
increased, reflecting the increasing demand for the Division's expertise
in other areas of crime (including computer and high-technology crime,
child exploitation, organized crime, and public corruption cases).

*Other Critical Division Workload*

Actively litigating and investigating cases and matters make up a small
part of the Division's total critical contributions to achieving the
Department's goals. The Division also provides expert guidance and legal
advice and performs mandatory reviews of critical law enforcement tools.
Expert guidance and legal advice pertains to legal advisory matters,
legislative and policy analysis work, training, and programmatic
coordination. Critical law enforcement tools refer to the facilitation
and review of requests for wiretaps, witness security, prisoner
transfers, extraditions, mutual assistance, etc.

The Division is projecting the following workload from FY 2008 to FY
2009:

-   1% increase in the number of legislative and policy analysis matters
    completed

-   5% increase in the number of programmatic coordination activities
    completed

-   4% increase in the number of legal advisory matters completed

-   2% decrease in the number of training sessions and presentations
    completed

-   2% increase in the number of mandatory reviews completed

b\. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes

The Criminal Division's mission is to develop, enforce, and exercise
general oversight for all federal criminal laws. In fulfilling this
mission, the Division plays a central role in assisting the Department
in accomplishing its Strategic Goals One and Two. Section I (Overview)
of this budget fully discusses the Division's current strategies to
accomplish these outcomes.

c\. Results of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews

The Criminal Division was assessed through the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) along with five
other litigating components---Antitrust, Civil, Civil Rights,
Environment and Natural Resources, and Tax Divisions. At the end of the
assessment, OMB found that the Program:

-   Effectively achieves its goal of resolving cases in favor of the
    government;

-   Collaborates effectively with its partners, notably the US Attorneys
    Offices; and

-   Exhibits good management practices, including

    -   Strong financial management

    -   Collecting and using performance information to make decisions;
        and

    -   Holding managers accountable for program performance.

To further improve the Program, the Division will pursue three follow-up
actions:

-   Implementing a plan to conduct an independent evaluation;

-   Establishing a leadership training and mentoring program to continue
    improving the quality of program management; and,

-   Working with the Department\'s Chief Information Officer to evaluate
    and purchase litigation software that will improve productivity and
    efficiency.

The Criminal Division, along with the other litigating components, is
working with the Department's Justice Management Division, Budget Staff,
to explore options for conducting an evaluation study for the group.
Additionally, the Division, through its training center, developed a
detailed, comprehensive leadership and management training plan for
implementation during FY 2007. The Division has selected vendors to
provide leadership and management training and even conducted several
training courses n FY 2007. Finally, the Department is planning to
implement a unified litigating case management system for all litigating
components and U.S. Attorneys' Offices across the country. The Division
is working closely with the CIO's office in this endeavor. In fact, the
Division is active member of the Department\'s Litigation Case
Management System (LCMS) Cross-Component Issues (CCI) Working Group.

**Item Name: Reducing Violent Crime and Organized Crime**

Budget Decision Unit(s): Enforcing Federal Criminal Laws

Strategic Goal(s) & Objective(s): DOJ Goal II, Prevent Crime, Enforce
Federal Laws and Represent the Rights and Interests of the American
People

> Strategic Objective 2.2, Reduce the Threat, Incidence, and Prevalence
> of Violent Crime
>
> Strategic Objective 2.4, Reduce the Threat, Trafficking, Use and
> Related Violence of Illegal Drugs

Organizational Program: The Criminal Division

Program Increase: Positions [2]{.underline} Atty [2]{.underline} FTE
[1]{.underline} Dollars [\$ 289,000]{.underline}

Description of Item

The Criminal Division requests two attorney positions and \$289,000 to
enhance its efforts to support the Attorney General's goal of reducing,
and ultimately ending, violent and organized crime. The Criminal
Division is perfectly positioned to be highly effective in investigating
and prosecuting the most dangerous members of society, but lacks the
crucial resources to fully develop this position. Resources are
particularly needed to develop and implement a comprehensive national
gang strategy and to create a strategy to end violence and crime related
to the southwest border.

Justification

Gang members now operate across state and international borders, and
their conduct has become a global issue. In fact, Gangs are no longer
confined to a single region and are oftentimes the vehicles that deliver
drugs across the country. This is why the Criminal Division remains
focused on reducing the violent crime and gang activity that plagues our
nation's neighborhoods. Furthermore, gangs and the transport of
methamphetamine along the southwest border of the U.S. are serious
problems that impact the entire country. This enhancement request will
enable the Department and the Administration to dedicate more resources
to prosecuting violent crimes and gang members that prosper throughout
our country and particularly along the southwest border.

In September 2006, the Criminal Division created the Gang Squad to
better focus its expertise and resources to target gang violence. Gang
Squad is a specialized group of federal prosecutors that use their
expertise to develop and implement strategies to attack the most
significant national and international gangs operating in the United
States. They also prosecute select gang cases of national importance,
and provide leadership and assistance to U.S. Attorneys' Offices in
multi-district cases.

Gang Squad prosecutors work hand-in-hand with the National Gang
Targeting, Enforcement, and Coordination Center (GangTECC) to
comprehensively target and coordinate multi-jurisdictional gang
investigations and prosecutions and develop national strategies to
disrupt and dismantle these dangerous organizations. GangTECC is the
Department's national anti-gang task force comprised of multiple
Department of Justice components, U.S Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE), and state and local law enforcement agencies across
the country. Through the collaborative efforts of the participating
agencies, GangTECC members combat gangs through enforcement, policy
initiatives, training, prevention efforts, and intelligence sharing.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Example of Gang Squad's Ongoing work**

  On December 21, 2007 in Philadelphia an Information was filed against
  Juan Sanchez, a.k.a. "King Macho", 24, charging him with conspiracy to
  conduct and participate in the racketeering enterprise activities of
  the Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation, a.k.a. the Latin Kings. The
  information alleges that from 1999 through 2007, Sanchez and others
  participated in a conspiracy to commit racketeering activity, including
  murder, attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder, as well as
  interference with commerce by threats or violence, and drug
  trafficking. The Latin Kings is a national criminal organization with
  tens of thousands of members organized in chapters throughout the
  United States. The information alleges that Sanchez was an officer of
  the Palmetto Tribe of the Latin Kings located in the Tampa, Fla. area,
  and was active in the gang in both Florida and in Philadelphia.
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

GangTECC requires that prosecutors and agents travel frequently across
the United States to target and tackle the nation's gang problem.
Currently there are nine special agents assigned to GangTECC. Travel to
various locations for investigative case coordination meetings,
conferences and operational planning is a basic and essential need for
the success of GangTECC. Currently this travel is unfunded and being
paid by each of the participating agencies when and if they can afford
it. The Criminal Division is requesting additional travel resources
(domestic and international travel) for the GangTECC Director who is a
Criminal Division Attorney.

Overall, the Division does important, unique, and highly complicated
work related to ending violent and organized crime. These enhancements
will enable the Division to continue to investigate and prosecute
violent crimes across the country and specifically along the southwest
border. With this small increase in resources, the Division can make
substantial progress in investigating, prosecuting, and ultimately
ending violent gang activity.

Impact on Performance (Relationship of Increase to Strategic Goals)

The Criminal Division works in direct support of the Attorney General's
goal two and objectives 2.2 and 2.4. By granting this enhancement, the
Division will be able to implement strategies to continue its mission
critical work of ending violent and organized crime.

-   These additional resources will lead to increased and cohesive
    strategy development and implementation, enabling the Division to
    conduct more advanced and detailed investigations leading to
    stronger case development and prosecution of criminal enterprises.

-   Without increased resources the Criminal Division's workload will
    only continue to grow resulting in the inability to effectively
    respond to the threat that dangerous gangs and organized criminals
    pose to the U.S.

-   The southwest border will continue to be a violent staging area for
    the trafficking of dangerous drugs including methamphetamine to
    communities across America. These program increases will help target
    and dismantle these violent criminal enterprises.

-   The rampant trafficking of drugs will enable gangs and organized
    crime groups to continue their illegal and dangerous activities that
    plague neighborhoods across America.

**Funding**

Base Funding

<table style="width:100%;">
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 14%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 13%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 15%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="4"><p id="fy-2007-enacted-wresc.supps" class="heading"> FY
2007 Enacted (w/resc./supps)</p></td>
<td colspan="4"><p id="fy-2008-enacted" class="heading">FY 2008
Enacted</p></td>
<td colspan="4"><p id="fy-2009-current-services" class="heading">FY 2009
Current Services</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Pos</td>
<td>atty</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$(000)</td>
<td>Pos</td>
<td>Atty</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$(000)</td>
<td>Pos</td>
<td>atty</td>
<td>FTE</td>
<td>$(000)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>$ 150</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>$154</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>$167</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

[Personnel Increase Cost Summary]{.underline}

+-------------+-------------+----------+---------------+--------------+
| Type of     | Modular     | Number   | FY 2009       | FY 2010      |
| Position    | Cost        | of       |               |              |
|             |             |          | Request       | Net          |
|             | per         | P        | (\$000)       | A            |
|             | Position    | ositions |               | nnualization |
|             | (\$000)     |          |               |              |
|             |             | R        |               | (change from |
|             |             | equested |               | 2009)        |
|             |             |          |               |              |
|             |             |          |               | (\$000)      |
+-------------+-------------+----------+---------------+--------------+
| GS-14       | \$120       | 2        | \$239         | \$195        |
| Attorney    |             |          |               |              |
+-------------+-------------+----------+---------------+--------------+
| Total       |             | 2        | \$239         | \$195        |
| Personnel   |             |          |               |              |
+-------------+-------------+----------+---------------+--------------+

Non-Personnel Increase Cost Summary

+-------------+------------+-------------+-------------+--------------+
| No          | Unit Cost  | Quantity    | FY 2009     | FY 2010 Net  |
| n-Personnel |            |             | Request     |              |
| Item        |            |             |             | A            |
|             |            |             | (\$000)     | nnualization |
|             |            |             |             |              |
|             |            |             |             | (Change from |
|             |            |             |             | 2009)        |
|             |            |             |             |              |
|             |            |             |             | (\$000)      |
+-------------+------------+-------------+-------------+--------------+
| Travel      | \$50       | 1           | \$50        | \$0          |
+-------------+------------+-------------+-------------+--------------+
| Total       | \$50       | 1           | \$50        | \$0          |
| No          |            |             |             |              |
| n-Personnel |            |             |             |              |
+-------------+------------+-------------+-------------+--------------+

Total Request for this Item

+-----------+-----+------+-----+----------+---------+--------------+
|           | Pos | Atty | FTE | P        | Non-Pe  | Total        |
|           |     |      |     | ersonnel | rsonnel |              |
|           |     |      |     |          |         | (\$000)      |
|           |     |      |     | (\$000)  | (\$000) |              |
+-----------+-----+------+-----+----------+---------+--------------+
| Current   | 1   | 1    | 1   | \$167    | 0       | \$167        |
| Services  |     |      |     |          |         |              |
+-----------+-----+------+-----+----------+---------+--------------+
| Increases | 2   | 2    | 1   | \$239    | \$50    | \$289        |
+-----------+-----+------+-----+----------+---------+--------------+
| Grand     | 3   | 3    | 2   | \$406    | \$50    | \$456        |
| Total     |     |      |     |          |         |              |
+-----------+-----+------+-----+----------+---------+--------------+

**V. E-Government Initiatives**

The Justice Department is fully committed to the President's Management
Agenda (PMA) and the E-Government initiatives that are integral to
achieving the objectives of the PMA. The E-Government initiatives serve
citizens, business, and federal employees by delivering high quality
services more efficiently at a lower price. The Department is in varying
stages of implementing E-Government solutions and services including
initiatives focused on integrating government wide transactions,
processes, standards adoption, and consolidation of administrative
systems that are necessary tools for agency administration, but are not
core to DOJ's mission. To ensure that DOJ obtains value from the various
initiatives, the Department actively participates in the governance
bodies that direct the initiatives and we communicate regularly with the
other federal agencies that are serving as the "Managing Partners" to
ensure that the initiatives meet the needs of the Department and its
customers. The Department believes that working with other agencies to
implement common or consolidated solutions will help DOJ to reduce the
funding requirements for administrative and public-facing systems,
thereby allowing DOJ to focus more of its scarce resources on higher
priority, mission related needs. DOJ's modest contributions to the
Administration's E-Government projects will facilitate achievement of
this objective.

**A. Funding and Costs**

The Department of Justice participates in the following E-Government
initiatives and Lines of Business:

  ------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------
  Business Gateway   E-Travel          Integrated          Case Management LoB
                                       Acquisition         
                                       Environment         

  Disaster           Federal Asset     IAE - Loans &       Geospatial LoB
  Assistance         Sales             Grants - Dunn &     
  Improvement Plan                     Bradstreet          

  Disaster Assist.   Geospatial        Financial Mgmt.     Budget Formulation
  Improvement Plan - One-Stop          Consolidated LoB    and Execution LoB
  Capacity Surge                                           

  E-Authentication   GovBenefits.gov   Human Resources LoB IT Infrastructure
                                                           LoB

  E-Rulemaking       Grants.gov        Grants Management   
                                       LoB                 
  ------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------

The Department of Justice E-Government expenses -- i.e. DOJ's share of
e-Gov initiatives managed by other federal agencies -- are paid for from
the Department's Working Capital Fund. These costs, along with other
internal E-Government related expenses (oversight and administrative
expenses such as salaries, rent, etc.) are reimbursed by the components
to the WCF. The Criminal Division's reimbursement amount is based on the
anticipated or realized benefits from an e-Government initiative. As
such, the Criminal Division's E-Government reimbursement to the WCF is
\$187,000 for FY2008. The anticipated Criminal Division e-Government
reimbursement to WCF is \$105,000 for FY2009.