+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| **Monitoring  | **Status of APR Data/SPP        | **OSEP            |
| Priorities    | Revision Issues**               | Analysis/Next     |
| and           |                                 | Steps**           |
| Indicators**  |                                 |                   |
+===============+=================================+===================+
| 1.  Percent   | The State revised the           | The State         |
|     of        | improvement activities for this | reported that     |
|     infants   | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | noncompliance     |
|     and       | accepts those revisions.        | identified in FFY |
|     toddlers  |                                 | 2005 with the     |
|     with      | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | timely service    |
|     IFSPs who | data for this indicator are     | provision         |
|     receive   | 99%. These data represent       | requirements in   |
|     the early | progress from the FFY 2005 data | 34 CFR            |
|               | of 96%.                         | §§303.340(c),     |
|  intervention |                                 | 303.342(e) and    |
|     services  | The State did not meet its FFY  | 303.344(f)(1) was |
|     on their  | 2006 target of 100%.            | corrected in a    |
|     IFSPs in  |                                 | timely manner.    |
|     a timely  | The State reported that seven   |                   |
|     manner.   | of seven findings of            | OSEP appreciates  |
|               | noncompliance identified in FFY | the State's       |
| \[Compliance  | 2005 related to this indicator  | efforts and looks |
| Indicator\]   | were corrected in a timely      | forward to        |
|               | manner.                         | reviewing in the  |
|               |                                 | FFY 2007 APR, due |
|               |                                 | February 1, 2009, |
|               |                                 | the State's data  |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | that it is in     |
|               |                                 | compliance with   |
|               |                                 | the requirements  |
|               |                                 | in 34 CFR         |
|               |                                 | §§303.340(c),     |
|               |                                 | 303.342(e) and    |
|               |                                 | 303.344(f)(1),    |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 2.  Percent   | The State revised the           | OSEP appreciates  |
|     of        | improvement activities for this | the State's       |
|     infants   | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | efforts to        |
|     and       | accepts those revisions.        | improve           |
|     toddlers  |                                 | performance.      |
|     with      | The State's FFY 2006 reported   |                   |
|     IFSPs who | data for this indicator are     |                   |
|     primarily | 89.6%. The State met its FFY    |                   |
|     receive   | 2006 target of 89%.             |                   |
|     early     |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|  intervention |                                 |                   |
|     services  |                                 |                   |
|     in the    |                                 |                   |
|     home or   |                                 |                   |
|     programs  |                                 |                   |
|     for       |                                 |                   |
|     typically |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|    developing |                                 |                   |
|     children. |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 3.  Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
|     of        | progress data for this          | reported the      |
|     infants   | indicator are:                  | required progress |
|     and       |                                 | data and          |
|     toddlers  | <table>                         | improvement       |
|     with      | <colgroup>                      | activities. The   |
|     IFSPs who | <col style="width: 58%" />      | State must        |
|               | <col style="width: 13%" />      | provide progress  |
|   demonstrate | <col style="width: 13%" />      | data with the FFY |
|     improved: | <col style="width: 13%" />      | 2007 APR, due     |
|               | </colgroup>                     | February 1, 2009, |
| A. Positive   | <thead>                         | and baseline data |
| soc           | <tr class="header">             | and targets with  |
| ial-emotional | <th>06-07 Infant and Toddler    | the FFY 2008 APR, |
| skills        | Outcome Progress Data</th>      | due February 1,   |
| (including    | <th><blockquote>                | 2010.             |
| social        | <p>Social</p>                   |                   |
| re            | <p>Emotional</p>                |                   |
| lationships); | </blockquote></th>              |                   |
|               | <th><blockquote>                |                   |
| B.            | <p>Knowledge</p>                |                   |
| Acquisition   | <p>&amp; Skills</p>             |                   |
| and use of    | </blockquote></th>              |                   |
| knowledge and | <th><blockquote>                |                   |
| skills        | <p>Appropriate Behavior</p>     |                   |
| (including    | </blockquote></th>              |                   |
| early         | </tr>                           |                   |
| language/     | </thead>                        |                   |
| co            | <tbody>                         |                   |
| mmunication); | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
| and           | <td>a. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who did not improve    |                   |
| C. Use of     | functioning.</td>               |                   |
| appropriate   | <td>1.5%</td>                   |                   |
| behaviors to  | <td>0.4%</td>                   |                   |
| meet their    | <td>0.5%</td>                   |                   |
| needs.        | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="even">               |                   |
| \[Results     | <td>b. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
| Indicator;    | toddlers who improved but not   |                   |
| New\]         | sufficient to move nearer to    |                   |
|               | functioning comparable to       |                   |
|               | same-aged peers.</td>           |                   |
|               | <td>8.0%</td>                   |                   |
|               | <td>16.0%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>11.9%</td>                  |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
|               | <td>c. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who improved to a      |                   |
|               | level nearer to same-aged       |                   |
|               | peers but did not reach         |                   |
|               | it.</td>                        |                   |
|               | <td>3.1%</td>                   |                   |
|               | <td>15.7%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>2.5%</td>                   |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="even">               |                   |
|               | <td>d. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who improved           |                   |
|               | functioning to reach a level    |                   |
|               | comparable to same-aged         |                   |
|               | peers.</td>                     |                   |
|               | <td>16.4%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>46.8%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>20.9%</td>                  |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
|               | <td>e. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who maintained         |                   |
|               | functioning at a level          |                   |
|               | comparable to same-aged         |                   |
|               | peers.</td>                     |                   |
|               | <td>71.0%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>21.1%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>64.1%</td>                  |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | </tbody>                        |                   |
|               | </table>                        |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               | The State provided improvement  |                   |
|               | activities for this indicator   |                   |
|               | covering the remaining years of |                   |
|               | the SPP through FFY 2010.       |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 4\. Percent   | The State's reported data for   | OSEP's June 15,   |
| of families   | this indicator are:             | 2007 FFY 2005     |
| participating |                                 | SPP/APR response  |
| in Part C who |   --------                      | table required    |
| report that   | -------- ------ ------ -------- | the State to      |
| early         |                                 | include in the    |
| intervention  |          FFY    FFY    FFY 2006 | February 1, 2008  |
| services have |                                 | APR the extent to |
| helped the    |            2005   2006   Target | which parent      |
| family:       |                                 | survey responses  |
|               |                  Data   Data    | were              |
| A. Know their |                                 | representative of |
| rights;       |   A.                            | the State's       |
|               | Know their    74%    76%    74% | population. The   |
| B.            |                                 | State reported    |
| Effectively   | rights.                         | that its FFY 2006 |
| communicate   |                                 | data for this     |
| their         |    B.                           | indicator were    |
| children\'s   |  Effectively  72%    74%    72% | collected from a  |
| needs; and    |                                 | response group    |
|               | communicate                     | that was not      |
| C. Help their |                                 | representative of |
| children      | their children's                | the population.   |
| develop and   |                                 | The State         |
| learn.        | needs.                          | described         |
|               |                                 | improvement       |
| \[Results     |    C.                           | activities that   |
| Indicator;    |  Help their   82%    81%    82% | included the      |
| New\]         |                                 | analysis of local |
|               | children develop                | data, involvement |
|               |                                 | of local          |
|               | and learn.                      | stakeholders and  |
|               |   --------                      | participation of  |
|               | -------- ------ ------ -------- | State staff to    |
|               |                                 | improve the       |
|               | These data represent progress   | r                 |
|               | for 4A and 4B and slippage for  | epresentativeness |
|               | 4C from the FFY 2005 data.      | of its response   |
|               |                                 | group. In the FFY |
|               | The State met its FFY 2006      | 2007 APR, due     |
|               | targets for 4A and 4B and did   | February 1, 2009, |
|               | not meet its FFY 2006 target    | the State must    |
|               | for 4C.                         | include a         |
|               |                                 | description of    |
|               |                                 | its efforts to    |
|               |                                 | ensure that its   |
|               |                                 | FFY 2007 data are |
|               |                                 | based on a        |
|               |                                 | response group    |
|               |                                 | that is           |
|               |                                 | representative of |
|               |                                 | the State's       |
|               |                                 | population.       |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 | OSEP appreciates  |
|               |                                 | the State's       |
|               |                                 | efforts to        |
|               |                                 | improve           |
|               |                                 | performance and   |
|               |                                 | looks forward to  |
|               |                                 | the State's data  |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | improvement in    |
|               |                                 | performance in    |
|               |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
|               |                                 | due February 1,   |
|               |                                 | 2009.             |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 5\. Percent   | The State revised the           | OSEP appreciates  |
| of infants    | improvement activities for this | the State's       |
| and toddlers  | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | efforts to        |
| birth to 1    | accepts those revisions.        | improve           |
| with IFSPs    |                                 | performance.      |
| compared to:  | The State's FFY 2006 reported   |                   |
|               | data for this indicator are     |                   |
| A. Other      | 1.34%. These data represent     |                   |
| States with   | progress from the FFY 2005 data |                   |
| similar       | of 1.24%.                       |                   |
| eligibility   |                                 |                   |
| definitions;  | The State met its FFY 2006      |                   |
| and           | target of 1.34%.                |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| B. National   |                                 |                   |
| data.         |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 6\. Percent   | The State revised the           | OSEP appreciates  |
| of infants    | improvement activities for this | the State's       |
| and toddlers  | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | efforts to        |
| birth to 3    | accepts those revisions.        | improve           |
| with IFSPs    |                                 | performance.      |
| compared to:  | The State's FFY 2006 reported   |                   |
|               | data for this indicator are     |                   |
| A. Other      | 3.03%. These data represent     |                   |
| States with   | progress from the FFY 2005 data |                   |
| similar       | of 2.88%.                       |                   |
| eligibility   |                                 |                   |
| definitions;  | The State met its FFY 2006      |                   |
| and           | target of 2.88%.                |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| B. National   |                                 |                   |
| data.         |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 7\. Percent   | The State revised the           | The State         |
| of eligible   | improvement activities for this | reported that     |
| infants and   | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | noncompliance     |
| toddlers with | accepts those revisions.        | identified in FFY |
| IFSPs for     |                                 | 2005 with the     |
| whom an       | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | 45-day timeline   |
| evaluation    | data for this indicator are     | requirements in   |
| and           | 93%. These data represent       | 34 CFR            |
| assessment    | progress from the FFY 2005 data | §§303.321(e)(2),  |
| and an        | of 92%.                         | 303.322(e)(1),    |
| initial IFSP  |                                 | and 303.342(a)    |
| meeting were  | The State did not meet its FFY  | was corrected in  |
| conducted     | 2006 target of 100%.            | a timely manner.  |
| within Part   |                                 |                   |
| C's 45-day    | The State reported that seven   | The State must    |
| timeline.     | of seven findings of            | review its        |
|               | noncompliance identified in FFY | improvement       |
| \[Compliance  | 2005 related to this indicator  | activities and    |
| Indicator\]   | were corrected in a timely      | revise, if        |
|               | manner.                         | appropriate, to   |
|               |                                 | ensure they will  |
|               |                                 | enable the State  |
|               |                                 | to provide data   |
|               |                                 | in the FFY 2007   |
|               |                                 | APR, due February |
|               |                                 | 1, 2009,          |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | that the State is |
|               |                                 | in compliance     |
|               |                                 | with the          |
|               |                                 | requirements in   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR            |
|               |                                 | §§303.321(e)(2),  |
|               |                                 | 303.322(e)(1),    |
|               |                                 | and 303.342(a),   |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State revised the           | The State         |
| of all        | improvement activities for this | reported that     |
| children      | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | noncompliance     |
| exiting Part  | accepts those revisions.        | identified in FFY |
| C who         |                                 | 2005 with the     |
| received      | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | IFSP transition   |
| timely        | data for this indicator are     | content           |
| transition    | 99%. These data represent       | requirements in   |
| planning to   | progress from the FFY 2005 data | 34 CFR            |
| support the   | of 97.6%.                       | §§303.148(b)(4)   |
| child's       |                                 | and 303.344(h)    |
| transition to | The State reported that three   | was corrected in  |
| preschool and | of three findings of            | a timely manner.  |
| other         | noncompliance identified in FFY |                   |
| appropriate   | 2005 related to this indicator  | OSEP appreciates  |
| community     | were corrected in a timely      | the State's       |
| services by   | manner.                         | efforts and looks |
| their third   |                                 | forward to        |
| birthday      |                                 | reviewing in the  |
| including:    |                                 | FFY 2007 APR, due |
|               |                                 | February 1, 2009, |
| A. IFSPs with |                                 | the State's       |
| transition    |                                 | demonstration     |
| steps and     |                                 | that it is in     |
| services;     |                                 | compliance with   |
|               |                                 | the requirements  |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | in 34 CFR         |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | §§303.148(b)(4)   |
|               |                                 | and 303.344(h),   |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State revised the           | The State         |
| of all        | improvement activities for this | reported that     |
| children      | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | noncompliance     |
| exiting Part  | accepts those revisions.        | identified in FFY |
| C who         |                                 | 2005 with the LEA |
| received      | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | notification      |
| timely        | data for this indicator are     | requirements in   |
| transition    | 99.7%. These data represent     | 34 CFR            |
| planning to   | progress from the FFY 2005 data | §303.148(b)(1)    |
| support the   | of 98.9%.                       | was corrected in  |
| child's       |                                 | a timely manner.  |
| transition to | The State reported that three   |                   |
| preschool and | of three findings of            | OSEP appreciates  |
| other         | noncompliance identified in FFY | the State's       |
| appropriate   | 2005 related to this indicator  | efforts and looks |
| community     | were corrected in a timely      | forward to        |
| services by   | manner.                         | reviewing in the  |
| their third   |                                 | FFY 2007 APR, due |
| birthday      |                                 | February 1, 2009, |
| including:    |                                 | the State's data  |
|               |                                 | demonstration     |
| B.            |                                 | that it is in     |
| Notification  |                                 | compliance with   |
| to LEA, if    |                                 | the requirements  |
| child         |                                 | in 34 CFR         |
| potentially   |                                 | §303.148(b)(1),   |
| eligible for  |                                 | including         |
| Part B; and   |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | noncompliance     |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State revised the           | The State         |
| of all        | improvement activities for this | reported that     |
| children      | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | noncompliance     |
| exiting Part  | accepts those revisions.        | identified in FFY |
| C who         |                                 | 2005 with the     |
| received      | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | timely transition |
| timely        | data for this indicator are     | conference        |
| transition    | 94.7%. These data represent     | requirements in   |
| planning to   | progress from the FFY 2005 data | 34 CFR            |
| support the   | of 92%.                         | §303.148(b)(2)(i) |
| child's       |                                 | (as modified by   |
| transition to | The State did not meet its FFY  | IDEA section      |
| preschool and | 2006 target of 100%.            | 637(a)(9)) was    |
| other         |                                 | corrected in a    |
| appropriate   | The State reported that twelve  | timely manner.    |
| community     | of twelve findings of           |                   |
| services by   | noncompliance identified in FFY | The State must    |
| their third   | 2005 related to this indicator  | review its        |
| birthday      | were corrected in a timely      | improvement       |
| including:    | manner.                         | activities and    |
|               |                                 | revise them, if   |
| C. Transition |                                 | appropriate, to   |
| conference,   |                                 | ensure they will  |
| if child      |                                 | enable the State  |
| potentially   |                                 | to provide data   |
| eligible for  |                                 | in the FFY 2007   |
| Part B.       |                                 | APR, due February |
|               |                                 | 1, 2009,          |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | demonstrating     |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | that the State is |
|               |                                 | in compliance     |
|               |                                 | with the          |
|               |                                 | requirements in   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR            |
|               |                                 | §303.148(b)(2)(i) |
|               |                                 | (as modified by   |
|               |                                 | IDEA section      |
|               |                                 | 637(a)(9)),       |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 9\. General   | The State revised the           | OSEP appreciates  |
| supervision   | improvement activities for this | the State's       |
| system        | indicator in its SPP and OSEP   | efforts in timely |
| (including    | accepts those revisions.        | correcting        |
| monitoring,   |                                 | noncompliance     |
| complaints,   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | identified under  |
| hearings,     | data for this indicator are     | this indicator in |
| etc.)         | 100%. These data represent      | accordance with   |
| identifies    | progress from the FFY 2005 data | IDEA section      |
| and corrects  | of 98%.                         | 635(a)(10)(A) and |
| noncompliance |                                 | 34 CFR §303.501.  |
| as soon as    | The State met its target of     |                   |
| possible but  | 100%.                           | In responding to  |
| in no case    |                                 | Indicators 1, 7,  |
| later than    |                                 | 8A, 8B and 8C in  |
| one year from |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| id            |                                 | due February 1,   |
| entification. |                                 | 2009, the State   |
|               |                                 | must specifically |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | identify and      |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | address the       |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in     |
|               |                                 | this table under  |
|               |                                 | those indicators. |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 10\. Percent  | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | OSEP appreciates  |
| of signed     | data for this indicator are     | the State's       |
| written       | 100%. These data are based on   | efforts in        |
| complaints    | one complaint. These data       | achieving         |
| with reports  | remain unchanged from the FFY   | compliance with   |
| issued that   | 2005 data of 100%.              | the timely        |
| were resolved |                                 | complaint         |
| within 60-day | The State met its FFY 2006      | resolution        |
| timeline or a | target of 100%.                 | requirements in   |
| timeline      |                                 | 34 CFR §§303.510  |
| extended for  |                                 | through 303.512.  |
| exceptional   |                                 |                   |
| circumstances |                                 |                   |
| with respect  |                                 |                   |
| to a          |                                 |                   |
| particular    |                                 |                   |
| complaint.    |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 11\. Percent  | The State reported that it did  | OSEP looks        |
| of fully      | not receive any due process     | forward to        |
| adjudicated   | hearing requests during the FFY | reviewing the     |
| due process   | 2006 reporting period.          | State's data in   |
| hearing       |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| requests that |                                 | due February 1,   |
| were fully    |                                 | 2009.             |
| adjudicated   |                                 |                   |
| within the    |                                 |                   |
| applicable    |                                 |                   |
| timeline.     |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 12\. Percent  | Not applicable.                 | This indicator    |
| of hearing    |                                 | does not apply to |
| requests that |                                 | the State because |
| went to       |                                 | the State has not |
| resolution    |                                 | adopted the Part  |
| sessions that |                                 | B due process     |
| were resolved |                                 | procedures.       |
| through       |                                 |                   |
| resolution    |                                 |                   |
| session       |                                 |                   |
| settlement    |                                 |                   |
| agreements    |                                 |                   |
| (applicable   |                                 |                   |
| if Part B due |                                 |                   |
| process       |                                 |                   |
| procedures    |                                 |                   |
| are adopted). |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 13\. Percent  | The State reported that no      | OSEP looks        |
| of mediations | mediations were held during the | forward to the    |
| held that     | FFY 2006 reporting period.      | reviewing the     |
| resulted in   |                                 | State's data in   |
| mediation     |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| agreements.   |                                 | due February 1,   |
|               |                                 | 2009.             |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 14\. State    | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | OSEP appreciates  |
| reported data | data for this indicator are     | the State's       |
| (618 and      | 100%.                           | efforts in        |
| State         |                                 | achieving         |
| Performance   | The State met its FFY 2006      | compliance with   |
| Plan and      | target of 100%.                 | IDEA sections,    |
| Annual        |                                 | 616, 618, and 642 |
| Performance   |                                 | and 34 CFR        |
| Report) are   |                                 | §§76.720 and      |
| timely and    |                                 | 303.540.          |
| accurate.     |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+