**Section C**

**Exhibit A Statement of Work**

**and**

**Exhibit D Statement of Work**

**[STATEMENT OF WORK - OVERVIEW]{.underline}**

The statement of work paragraphs has been coded to identify applicable
categories of efforts to be performed under the NAS15-10000 contract.
Exhibit A is coded to identify four statement of work categories defined
as follows:

Category 1 Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (DDT&E)

Development, verification and delivery of hardware and software for the
USOS elements

Category 2 Integration and Operations (I&O)

Integration of the USOS elements and other system elements to assemble
and operate a safe and productive International space Station

Category 3 Spares

Acquisition and deployment of spare hardware components for ISS
maintenance and repair

Category 4 Other Program Development (OPD)

Development, verification, and delivery of hardware and software
components to support and enhance operation of the ISS elements

**EXHIBIT A**

**INTRODUCTION**

Scope

Key Terms

**1.0 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS)**

**1.1 ISS Analysis and Integration**

I&O 1.1.1 System Requirements

I&O 1.1.2 Verification

I&O 1.1.3 Configuration Management

I&O 1.1.4 Program Integration and Risk Management

I&O 1.1.5 International Software Provider

I&O **1.2 Program Control & Business Management**

I&O 1.2.1 Program Planning and Control

I&O 1.2.2 Financial Management

I&O 1.2.3 Information Systems

1.2.4 Software Engineering Institute Certification

1.2.5 -- 1.2.17...Reserved

**I&O, DDT&E1.3 Vehicle Development**

a, e-f: DDT&E; b-d: I&O

I&O 1.3.1 Vehicle Analysis and Integration (VA&I)

I&O 1.3.1.1 Subsystem Architecture and Analysis

I&O 1.3.1.2 Vehicle Analysis

I&O 1.3.1.2.1 On-Orbit Check-Out: Development of ISS Program Policy and
PMI & VP

Update

I&O 1.3.1.2.2 Propulsion Module Design and Implementation and Long Lead
Development

I&O 1.3.1.3 Vehicle Integration

I&O 1.3.1.3.1 Engineering Planning

I&O, All 1.3.1.3.2 Vehicle Definition

a-c, e: I&O; d: DDT&E, I&O, Spares, OPD

I&O 1.3.1.3.3 Engineering Data Management

I&O, DDT& 1.3.1.3.4 Interface Definition; a: I&O; b: DDT&E

I&O 1.3.1.3.5 Resource Management

I&O 1.3.1.4 Vehicle Effectiveness

I&O, DDT&E1.3.1.5 Vehicle Verification

DDT&E, a-c: I&O; d: DDT&E,I&O, e: DDT&E; f-g: I&O

I&O 1.3.1.6 Vehicle Requirements

I&O 1.3.1.6.1 Robotic Workstation

I&O 1.3.1.7 Vehicle Test

I&O 1.3.1.7.1 Vehicle Test

I&O 1.3.1.8 Shuttle Avionics Integration Laboratory (SAIL) Testing

I&O 1.3.1.9 Joint C&DH Tests

I&O 1.3.1.10 Early Communications System

I&O 1.3.1.10.1 Enhanced Simulation for the SVF - The ECOMM CPT Simulator

I&O 1.3.1.10.2 Deleted

I&O 1.3.1.11 Extravehicular Activity Hardware Testing

I&O 1.3.1.12 EVA AIT

I&O 1.3.1.12.1 NBL EVA Testing

I&O 1.3.1.12.2 EVA Evaluation and Test

I&O 1.3.1.12.3 EVA/EVR Training Support

I&O 1.3.1.13 Pressurized Logistics Module (PLM) Hatch Operations Kit
(PHOK)

DDT&E 1.3.1.14 Addition of Class H Bonding Straps to Hatches of Node 1

I&O 1.3.1.15 MT to MS Mechanical Interface Test

I&O 1.3.1.16 MT to MBS Interface Electrical Continuity Test

I&O 1.3.1.17 Russian/American Convertor Unit (RACU) Test Support

DDT&E 1.3.1.18 Z1 Jumper Cables

DDT&E 1.3.1.18.1 DDCU

OPD 1.3.1.18.2 RACU Restart Cables

OPD 1.3.1.18.3 Cross Channel Connect (CCC) C-Jumper

OPD 1.3.1.18.4 Secondary Power Feedback Jumper

I&O 1.3.1.19 KSC Altitude Chamber Reactivation and Element Level Leak
Test

I&O 1.3.1.20 MSS Control Equipment End-to-End Video Operations Test

DDT&E 1.3.1.21 Ku-Band Antenna Reflection Masking Software

DDT&E 1.3.1.22 Addition of OSE Window Protective Covers for the ISS and
Testing of Window

Scratch Panes

DDT&E 1.3.1.23 Power Data Grapple Fixture Cable Harness Installation and
Analysis

I&O 1.3.1.24 Russian Thermal Model Development and Support

I&O 1.3.1.25 ACBM to Berthing Plate Integration Design

DDT&E 1.3.1.26 Installation of Forward Stovepipe

I&O 1.3.1.27 Analysis of the ORUs and Worksites for Robotic Use

I&O 1.3.1.27.1 EVR Evaluation

I&O 1.3.1.28 Robotic Target Samples

I&O 1.3.1.28.1 Dexterous ORU Robotic Test Articles

I&O 1.3.1.29 Wireless Video System Test

I&O 1.3.1.30 Ammonia Tank Assembly Support of UF-4 Spacelab Pallet
Integration Activities

I&O 1.3.1.31 ITS S0 Rigid Avionics Assembly Structures to USL Fit Check

DDT&E 1.3.1.32 On-Orbit Replaceable Unit (ORU) Removal Fixture for the
Integrated Equipment

Assembly (IEA)

I&O 1.3.1.33 Mobile Transporter Hardware and Software Integration

I&O 1.3.1.34 Crew Health Care Subsystem Checkout and Fit Check Testing

DDT&E 1.3.1.35 Crew Health Care Subsystem Volatile Organic Analyzer
Mockup Build and

Integration

I&O 1.3.1.36 Boeing Support for ISS Training

OPD 1.3.1.37 The Medium Data Rate Communication Outage Recorder

OPD 1.3.1.38 The High Data Rate communication Outage Recorder

I&O 1.3.1.39 Operational Procedures for the Improvement of Moderate
Temperature Loop

Capability for Payloads

OPD 1.3.1.40 Provide ISS Power to the MPLM Prior to Node 2 Arrival

OPD 1.3.1.40.1 MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper

OPD 1.3.1.40.2 Power Analysis Study

OPD 1.3.1.41 On-Orbit MDM Firmware Update

I&O 1.3.1.42 Mobile Transporter to Mobile Based Servicer Attachment Bolt
Interface Testing

I&O 1.3.1.43 Thruster Plume Contamination Math Models Development

OPD, I&O 1.3.1.44 Node 3 Software

I&O 1.3.1.45 Logistics Carrier and Attached Payload Interface Analysis

I&O 1.3.1.46 Suit Performance Checkout Equipment Workmanship & Anomaly
Resolution Test

DDT&E 1.3.1.47 Enhancement of Ni-H2 Battery Subassembly ORUs to Provide
for Individual Cell

Let Down and External Cell Voltage Monitoring

DDT&E 1.3.1.48 Support Node 2 and Node 3 Shell Temperature Sensors

OPD 1.3.1.49 Implementation of Preliminary Design and Analysis of the
EXPRESS Pallet

Controller Assembly

DDT&E 1.3.1.50 MT to MBS Capture Bar Relocation

DDT&E 1.3.1.51 Solar Array Blanket Box Label

I&O 1.3.1.52 Digital Pre-Assembly measurements of Lab Cradle Assemby

OPD 1.3.1.53 Direct Current Switching Unit (DCSU) Interface Flight
Support Equipment

OPD 1.3.1.54 PMA-1 H-Jumper Cables

OPD 1.3.1.55 Flight Releaseable Attachment Mechanism

OPD 1.3.1.56 MDM On-Orbit Test Set

OPD 1.3.1.57 Gamah Seal Maintenance Kits and Leak-Check Kits

DDT&E 1.3.1.58 Solar Array Wing EVA Capability

DDT&E 1.3.1.59 Airlock SVS Target Accommodations

I&O 1.3.1.60 EVA Fasteners

I&O 1.3.1.61 Development of Alternate Direct Current to Direct Current
Conversion Unit

I&O 1.3.1.62 Crew Health Care System (CheCS) Performance

I&O 1.3.1.63 Support for the Development of the Fluid Line Repair Kit

OPD\` 1.3.1.64 Removal of the MPLM Input Power Grounding Loops

DDT&E 1.3.1.65 Color Coded Labels for the UIA

I&O 1.3.1.66 EVA Fastener Data

I&O 1.3.1.67 Hardware/Software Integration

I&O 1.3.1.68 Digital Pre-Assembly Measurement and Analysis of
Element-to-Element Interfaces

I&O 1.3.1.69 Software Flight Operations Information

OPD 1.3.1.70 Cupola Pressure Pane Proof Testing

OPD 1.3.1.71 Cupola Window Pane Markings

I&O, DDT&E 1.3.2 Subsystems Providers a)1-4a: DDT&E; a)4b: I&O; a)5-6:
DDT&E; a)7-8:I&O;

b\) DDT&E

DDT&E 1.3.2.1 Electrical Power (EP)

DDT&E 1.3.2.2 Thermal Control (TC)

DDT&E 1.3.2.3 Guidance, Navigation and Control (GN&C)

I&O 1.3.2.3.1 GN&C Pre-position Loads (PPLs)

DDT&E 1.3.2.4 Propulsion (P)

DDT&E 1.3.2.5 Command and Data Handling (C&DH)

DDT&E 1.3.2.6 Command and Tracking (C&T)

OPD 1.3.2.6.1 Implement Triple Data Encryption Standard

DDT&E 1.3.2.7 Life Support (LS)

DDT&E 1.3.2.8 Flight Crew Support (FCS)

DDT&E 1.3.2.9 Reserved

DDT&E 1.3.2.10 Extravehicular Activity (EVA)

DDT&E 1.3.2.11 Structures/Mechanisms (SM)

DDT&E\`1.3.2.12 Extravehicular Robotics (EVR)

OPD 1.3.2.13 Centerline Berthing Camera System (CBCS)

I&O 1.3.3 Launch Package/Stage Integration

I&O 1.3.3.1 Launch Package/Space Shuttle Integration

I&O 1.3.4 Russian Launch Package/Stage Integration

I&O 1.3.5 Non-Russian Launch Package/Stage Integration

I&O 1.3.5.1 Launch Package/Stage Analysis and Integration

I&O, DDT&E 1.3.5.2 Launch Package/Stage Elements and Support Equipment
a-c: DDT&E; d: I&O

DDT&E 1.3.6 Factory Equipment (FE)

1.3.7 -- 1.3.9 Reserved

I&O, DDT&E 1.3.10 Software Verification Facility (SVF) a)DDT&E; b) I&O

DDT&E 1.3.11 Phase 1 Risk Mitigation/Technology Demonstration

DDT&E 1.3.12 FGB Procurement and Integration

DDT&E 1.3.12.1 Requirements and Capabilities Definition

DDT&E 1.3.12.2 Integration Support

DDT&E 1.3.12.3 Test and Verification

DDT&E 1.3.12.4 Launch Site Support

DDT&E 1.3.12.5 Flight Operations

DDT&E 1.3.12.6 Training

DDT&E 1.3.12.7 Maintenance and Spares

DDT&E 1.3.12.8 Tier 1 Study Plan

DDT&E 1.3.12.9 FGB Safety and Mission Assurance

I&O 1.3.12.10 FGB Operational Support

I&O 1.3.13 Centrifuge Accommodation Module (CAM)

I&O 1.3.13.1 Develop Centrifuge Accommodation Module Prim Item
Development

Specification (PIDS)

I&O 1.3.14 Guidance, Navigation, & Control Integration Test Facility
(GITF)

I&O 1.3.14.1 GN& C Integration Test (GIT) Integrated Product Team (IPT)
Support

I&O 1.3.14.2 Test Plans and Procedures Support

I&O 1.3.14.3 US GN&C to US C&C Testing Software

I&O 1.3.14.4 US GN&C Testing of the FQT GN&C Flight Software Support

I&O 1.3.14.5 Pre-SVF GN&C Hardware and C&C GN&C Flight Software

I&O 1.3.15 Electrical Power System Development/Stage Acceptance Testing
Support

I&O 1.3.16 Reserved

I&O 1.3.17 Glass Characterization Testing

I&O 1.3.18 Space Integrated GPS/INS Testing

I&O 1.3.18.1 Space Integrated GPS/INS Installation and Checkout

DDT&E 1.3.19 Node 1 Strut Strain Gauge Outfitting

I&O 1.3.20 UHF Radio Measurement and Demonstration

I&O 1.3.21 S-Band and Ku-Band Subsystem Testing

I&O 1.3.22 Assembly Power Converter Unit to MPLM Electrical Power Test

DDT&E 1.3.23 Racks for Refrigerator/Freezers

DDT&E 1.3.24 Additional Bacteria Filter Elements in Node 1

I&O 1.3.25 Mobile Servicing System (MSS) Thermal Analysis

DDT&E 1.3.26 Node 1 Label

I&O 1.3.27 Radiator ORU Thermal Vacuum Demonstration

I&O 1.3.27.1 EVR Evaluation

DDT&E 1.3.28 Tether Location

DDT&E 1.3.29 Docked Audio Interface Unit (DAIU) to Russian Audio
Interface Unit (RAIU)

Interface Jumper Cable

I&O 1.3.30 EVA Crewmember Tool Impact Loads

DDT&E 1.3.31.1 Node 2 to CAM Vestibule Jumpers

I&O 1.3.31.2 Development of PIRN to ICD for Vestibule Jumpers

DDT&E 1.3.32 Airlock Pressure Relief

I&O, DDT&E 1.3.33 Node 2 Emulator a,b: DDT&E; c-g: I&O

DDT&E 1.3.34 Internal Thermal Control System (ITCS) Jumper Sets

DDT&E 1.3.35 Ammonia Jumper Kit

I&O 1.3.36 Lab Cradle Assembly to USL Module Integrated Assembly and Fit
Check

DDT&E 1.3.37 Depress Pump Muffler Development and Qualification Testing

DDT&E 1.3.38 Space Integrated Global Positioning System/Inertial
Navigation System

Enhancement

DDT&E 1.3.39 Airlock Hatch Testing

DDT&E 1.3.40 Worksite Interfaces for USL Heat Exchangers

DDT&E 1.3.41 USL Moderate Temperature Heat Exchanger Supply Line

DDT&E 1.3.42 Additional MATEs and FEU MDMs for Software Development and
Testing

I&O 1.3.43 ISS Airlock Testing

I&O 1.3.44 Management of RF Performance Data

DDT&E 1.3.45 ADA Compiler Licenses

I&O 1.3.46 Interim Resistive Device

I&O 1.3.47 Thermal Extreme Testing and Random Vibration Testing to
Trailing Umbilical

> System Cable Guide Acceptance Test

I&O 1.3.48 Service Module digital Preassembly Measurement

DDT&E 1.3.49 Design and Fabricate Electrical Power System Node 1 Patch
Panel & Cable and

> the USL Secondary Power Distribution Assembly Jumper Cable

OPD 1.3.50 FBG Stowage Bags

I&O 1.3.51 Evaluation and Analysis of Active CBM Controller

DDT&E 1.3.52 EVA Compatible Labels for Active CBM Cabling

DDT&E 1.3.53 Photovoltaic Module P6 Batteries

I&O 1.3.54 Data Records for OP05 Previously Submitted Imagery

I&O 1.3.54.1 Data Records for Other Previously Submitted Imagery

I&O 1.3.54.2 Pre-Flight Imagery Plans

I&O 1.3.54.3 Reporting and Imagery Working Group Support

I&O 1.3.54.4 Pre-Flight Imagery

DDT&E 1.3.55 Manually Operated Power Off Capability

I&O 1.3.56 Additional Hardware and Software Integration Testing

DDT&E 1.3.57 Scar for Star Tracker

I&O & DDT&E 1.3.58 SO and MT Launch to Activation Survivability

OPD 1.3.59 ESSMDM Development and Qualification Testing

I&O 1.3.60 US Laboratory Module Vibratory Microgravity Measurements and
Tests

I&O 1.3.61 Russian Laptop Computer Display Test

I&O 1.3.62 International Partner Module Common Berthing Mechanism
Structural Analysis

I&O 1.3.63 International Partner Module Common Berthing Mechanism
Acceptance Testing

I&O 1.3.64 Cupola

I&O 1.3.64.1 Common Hardware Related to Cupola

I&O 1.3.64.2 Design Review Support

I&O 1.3.64.3 Cupola Specification Maintenance

I&O 1.3.64.4 Cupola Verification Support

DDT&E & I&O 1.3.64.5 PCBM Kits

I&O 1.3.64.6 Common Hardware Storage

I&O 1.3.64.7 Cupola Glass Requirements

I&O 1.3.64.8 Window Frame Technical Support

OPD 1.3.64.9 Copula Debris Panes Redesign

DDT&E 1.3.65 Thermal Analysis for Debris Shields

I&O 1.3.66 Test Support to RSC-E for EM Testing

I&O 1.3.67 U.S./NASDA Joint Video and Audio Testing

I&O 1.3.68 SVF and ISIL Support for the MCC

DDT&E 1.3.69 Provide Scar for Ethernet/MIL-STD-1553 Growth Capability

OPD 1.3.70 EVA and IVA Window Debris Pane Changeout

OPD 1.3.71 Handrail and Worksite Interface Socket Accommodations

I&O 1.3.72 CBM System Level Testing of the JEM-PM and JEM ELM-PS CBM at
MHI

DDT&E 1.3.73 Addition and Installation of GFE Hardware

I&O 1.3.74 EVA Fit Check Test for Flight 8A

OPD 1.3.75 USL Jumper Kits for System Racks

I&O 1.3.76 Life Test, Window Shutter Gearbox Assembly

I&O 1.3.77 ITCS Cold Plate and Fluid Stability Test

DDT&E 1.3.78 Modify External Cameras

I&O 1.3.79 Site Activation and Post Delivery Checkout Activities

I&O 1.3.80 EPS Power Channel Confidence Test

I&O 1.3.81 Joint NASA/ESA C&DH Interface Test

I&O 1.3.82 Active Thermal Control System Radiator Can't Fail Processes

I&O 1.3.82.1 Plum Brook Operations

DDT&E 1.3.83 Lab Rack Closeout Change

I&O 1.3.84 On-Orbit Leak Detection and Repair

OPD 1.3.85 Resolution of ASBSP Dropped Telemetry Frames When Packet
Length Check Fails

DDT&E 1.3.86 P3/P4 Static Loads Test

OPD 1.3.87 EVA Pre-Breathe Protocol

I&O 1.3.88 Node 2/3 Integrated Rack Structural Analysis

OPD 1.3.89 Lab Jumper Cables

I&O 1.3.90 Human Factors Data for Alenia ORUs

OPD 1.3.91 OTDR Fiber Optic Cable Test

DDT&E 1.3.92 Leak Test for the Plasma Contractor Unit

DDT&E 1.3.93 Thermal Cycle Acceptance Testing for the Solar Array Wing
Locking Struts

I&O 1.3.94 ARIS Express Installation Maintenance Trainer Update

OPD 1.3.95 Fiber Optic Cable Screen Test

I&O 1.3.96 U. S. Lab Integrated Capability Test (ICT)

I&O 1.3.97 USL ARS Power Jumper

OPD 1.3.98 Internal Thermal Control System Sampling Tool

OPD 1.3.99 Universal Trunnion Attachment System Passive Sub-Assembly
Trunnion Pin Mod

I&O 1.3.100 Enumerate Video Primitives

OPD 1.3.101 S0/Node 3 Cable Harness Assemblies

OPD 1.3.102 Bus Over-Voltage Protection in Direct Current Switching Unit
Firmware

DDT&E 1.3.103 S0 UHF Termination Cables

I&O 1.3.104 Software Engineering Institute Certification

I&O 1.3.105 Manual Flow Control Valve Repeatability Testing

I&O 1.3.106 MLPM Air Flow Analysis

DDT&E 1.3.107 On-Orbit Fiber Optics Repair

DDT&E 1.3.108 Node 2 Service & Performance Checkout Unit (SPCU) Heat
Exchange (HX ATP)

I&O 1.3.109 International Partner Contamination Analysis

I&O 1.3.110 MT/MBS Analyses and Tests

OPD 1.3.111 Plasma Contractor Unit Firmware Upgrade

OPD 1.3.112 Floating Potential Probe (FPP)

I&O 1.3.113 Maintain Early Portable computer System Capability

Spares 1.3.114 MDM Obsolete Component Procedure -- Hybrid Die

OPD 1.3.115 CheCS Rack Warning Label Kit Development

I&O 1.3.116 Early Active Thermal control System Life Test

OPD 1.3.117 Hall Generator Assembly Redesign and Deployment

OPD 1.3.118 Fabrication of Airlock ATU/EACP Y-Cables

OPD 1.3.119 Female Quick Disconnect (QD) Valve Defeat Inspection Tools

OPD 1.3.120 Develop Type 9 ESS MDMs

OPD 1.3.121 EVA MSS Contingency Cable Kit

OPD 1.3.122 Add Filter to Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly

I&O 1.3.123 EPS ORU Firmware Updates

I&O 1.3.124 Avionics and Hardware Systems Integration, Simulations and
Mission Support

I&O 1.3.125 MSS Acceptance Test Activities

I&O 1.3.126 MSS Qualification Activities

OPD 1.3.127 Develop and Qualify New Design Capacitor

OPD 1.3.128 Develop ITCS Repair Kits

I&O 1.3.129 Avionics and Hardware Systems Integration, Simulations and
Mission Support

OPD 1.3.130 Avionics Laboratory Hardware Procurement

OPD 1.3.131 Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter Function

OPD 1.3.132 New SSQ 22680 Connector Inserts

OPD 1.3.133 Design and Fabricate P1 TRRJ Thermostat Box Thermal Blankets

OPD 1.3.134 GSE and Tech Support to Node 2

OPD 1.3.135 Recharge Oxygen Orifice Bypass/Replacement Kit

I&O 1.3.136 MT/CETA Rail Temporary Stops

OPD 1.3.137 New UF-2 Jumper Cable

OPD 1.3.138 Perform Node 2 Common ORU Tolerance Analysis for Common
Hardware

**1.4 Utilization (WBS 1.4) -- Through FY02**

I&O 1.4.1 Utilization Analysis & Integration (WBS 1.4.1) -- Through FY
02

I&O 1.4.1.1 Integration -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.1.2 Analysis -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.1.3 Safety -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.1.4 Program Reviews -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.2 Research Accommodations (WBS 1.4.2) -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.3 Facility Payload Design Evaluation & Hardware Tracking (WBS
1.4.3) -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.3.1 Mil-Std-1553B Remote Terminal Testing on Payload Remote
Terminals -- Through FY 02

I&O 1.4.3.2 Longeron Fittings for Window Observational Research Facility
(WORF) Rack -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.3.3 U.S. Lab Nadir Window Pre-Flight Testing -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.3.4 Space Station IVA Analysis System Support -- Through FY02

OPD 1.4.3.5 Support Engineering Tasks for Payload Support Equipment,
Post DD250 Through FY02

OPD 1.4.3.6 ARIS and WORF Hardware and Fit Checks for JEM and APM --
Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4 Payload Software Integration and Verification (PSIV) --
Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.1 PSIV Definition - Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.1.1 Payload Software Requirements Accommodation Analysis
Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.1.2 Complement PSIV -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.1.3 Complement Software Test and Mission Builds -- Through
FY02

I&O 1.4.4.1.4 Complement Software Verification Assessment -- Through
FY02

I&O 1.4.4.1.5 Payload Integration and Verification Capability (PIVC)
Definition -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.2 Payload Integration and Verification Capability (PIVC)
Development (PSIVF, STEP and PRCU) -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.2.1 Drawings -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.2.2 Utilization Support and Operations & Maintenance (O&M) --
Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.2.3 Payload Rack Checkout Unit Training and Certification --
Through FY02

I&O 1.4.4.3 Payload Rack Checkout Unit #4 Installation at KSC\-- Through
FY02

I&O 1.4.4.4 Payload Rack Checkout Unit Sensor Calibration -- Through
FY02

I&O 1.4.5 Payload Engineering & Integration (WBS 1.4.5) -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.5.1 PEI Planning -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.5.2 Develop/Acquire PEI Tools \-- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.5.3 Reserved

I&O 1.4.5.4 Perform PEI -- Through FY02

I&O 1.4.5.5 Payload Software Control Panel -- Through FY02

OPD 1.4.6 Long Spacer Shroud

OPD 1.4.7 Active Common Attach System Test and Qualification

I&O 1.4.8 PAS/Payload Interface Verification

I&O **1.5 Operations Capability Development and Operations Support**

I&O 1.5.1 Assembly and Station Mission Operations Support

I&O 1.5.2 Launch Site Processing

I&O 1.5.3 Logistics and Maintenance (L&M) for Vehicle

I&O 1.5.3.1 Management and Integration of L&M Tasks

I&O 1.5.3.2 Logistics Analysis

Spares 1.5.3.3 Spares

I&O 1.5.3.4 Supply Support

I&O 1.5.3.5 Maintenance and Resupply

I&O 1.5.4 Operations Planning and Cargo Integration

I&O 1.5.5 Sustaining Engineering

I&O 1.5.5.2 (WBS)

I&O 1.5.5.3 (WBS)

I&O 1.5.5.4 Reserved

I&O 1.5.5.5 (WBS)

I&O 1.5.5.6 Reserved

I&O 1.5.5.7-1.5.5.12 Reserved

I&O 1.5.5.13 (WBS)

I&O 1.5.5.14 (WBS)

I&O 1.5.5.15 (WBS)

I&O 1.5.6 Node Structural Test Article (STA) Move to JSC

I&O 1.5.7 EVA Fit Checks for Flights 2A through 7A

OPD 1.5.8 ORU Support Equipment Integration/Flight Operations Support

OPD 1.5.8.1 ORU Support Equipment Development

OPD 1.5.8.2 ORU Support Equipment and ORU/Contingency Item
Interoperability Evaluation

OPD 1.5.8.3 Crew Training Support

OPD 1.5.8.4 FSE Analytical Integration

I&O 1.5.9 Factory Equipment for Use as Ground Support Equipment

I&O 1.5.10 Caution and Warning Logic Database

I&O 1.5.11 Software Stage Data

I&O 1.5.12 Crew Training

I&O 1.5.13 MOD Product Development Support

I&O 1.5.14 Software Development Integration Support

**1.6
Reserved....................................................................................................**

I&O **1.7 Safety and Mission
Assurance......................................................................**

I&O 1.7.1 Safety, Reliability, and
Maintainability.............................................................

I&O 1.7.1.1 Safety Analytical Integration of IP and GFE Hardware
Transfer and Stowage

on ISS

DDT&E 1.7.2 Quality Assurance

DDT&E **1.8 Parallel Development**

I&O **1.9 Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (DDT&E) Level of
Effort**

I&O 1.9.1 Ammonia Tank Assembly Support of UF-4 Spacelab Pallet
Integration Activities

I&O 1.9.2 Russian Service Module/Command and Data Handling End to End
Test Support

I&O **1.10 Technical Definition of Contract Changes (Through FY99)**

11. **Equipment Modification**

DDT&E 1.11.1 Zero-G Stowage Rack

**1.12 Install Non-Specified Equipment as Directed**

DDT&E 1.12.1 Installation of Internal UHF Communications

I&O **1.13 Node 2 Reconfiguration**

DDT&E 1.13.1 Common Hardware/Software Related to Node 2

I&O 1.13.2 Technical Support to Alenia for Node 2

I&O 1.13.3 Node 2 Specification Maintenance

I&O 1.13.4 Node STA Disposition

DDT&E 1.13.5 Node STA Refurbishment

I&O 1.13.6 Node 2 Verification Support

1.13.7 CBM Kit Deliveries

DDT&E 1.13.7.1 ACBM Kits

DDT&E 1.13.7.2 PCBM Kit

I&O 1.13.7.3 CBM/Hatch Support and Analysis

I&O 1.13.7.4 ACBM Interface Definition

DDT&E 1.13.8 Node 2 Vestibule Jumpers

DDT&E 1.13.9 Common Hardware Requirements

1.13.10 Node 2 Software Support

I&O 1.13.10.1 Node 2 Software Test Support

DDT&E 1.13.10.2 Software User Manuals

I&O 1.13.10.3 Software Telecon Support

I&O 1.13.10.4 Software Test Planning Support

I&O 1.13.10.5 Software TIM Support

I&O 1.13.11 Support to the Joint Testing

I&O 1.13.12 Common Hardware Storage

I&O 1.13.13 Data Support to NASA

I&O 1.13.14 Node 2/Node 3 Liaison

1.13.15 Prop Module Power interface for Node 2

DDT&E 1.13.15.1 Connector Procurement

DDT&E 1.13.15.2 Dead Face Connector Procurement

DDT&E 1.13.16 Utility Rail Modification for Node 2

1.13.17 Node 2 Hardware Tasks

I&O 1.13.17.1 Node 2 and 3 Procurement Status

I&O 1.13.17.2 Node 2 and 3 Component Installation Kit Development

DDT&E 1.13.17.3 Node 2 Dead Face connectors

DDT&E 1.13.17.4 Provide Ammonia/Water Head Exchanger Heater Temperature
Sensor

Assemblies

OPD 1.13.17.5 Node Rack Tilt Tool

**1.14 Mini Pressurized Logistics Module (MPLM)**

I&O 1.14.1 MPLM Rack Installation

I&O 1.14.2 MPLM CAD Modeling

OPD 1.14.2.1 CAS/Payload Interface Verification

I&O **1.15 Super Guppy Tasks**

I&O, DDT&E **1.16 Year 2000 Compliance**

Spares, OPD

**1.17 Node 3**

I&O 1.17.1 Node 3 Requirements Development

I&O, OPD 1.17.2 Node 3 Hardware Procurement 1) OPD; 2) I&O

DDT&E **1.18 Spares Warehouse (SWH) Cargo Integration**

**1.19.1 Node 2 and 3 GSE Support**

I&O 1.19.1.1 Node 2 and 3 Transfer

I&O 1.19.1.2 Training for Node 2 and 3 GSE

I&O 1.19.2 Node 2 and 3 GSE ICD/IDD Development

OPD **1.20 Integrated Cargo Carrier**

I&O 1.20.1.1 EVA/EVR Training Support

I&O 1.20.1.2 Suit Performing Checkout Equipment Workmanship and

Anomaly Resolution Test

I&O 1.20.1.3 Crew Office Engineering and Operations Activities

OPD 1.20.2 Lab Cradle Assembly Thermal Cover

OPD 1.20.3 External Stowage Platform System Testing

OPD **1.21 NBL Test Support**

I&O **1.22 Phase 3 Launch-to-Activation Analysis (LTA)**

**1.23 Modification Kits**

DDT&E 1.23.1 Modification Kit Documentation

**Spares** **1.24 MDM Obsolete Component Procurement**

**I&O 1.25 IVA Fit Checks for Flights 5A and 7A**

**I&O 1.26 ICM**

**I&O 1.27 Operations Engineering Support**

I&O 1.27.1 Software

I&O 1.27.2 Command and Data Handling (C&DH)

I&O 1.27.3 Flight Support

I&O 1.27.4 Software/C&DH Support to MEIT

I&O 1.28 USPS

I&O 1.29 ORU Spares to Orbit

I&O 1.30 Engineering Analysis of ISS Extravehicular Cables and
Connectors

OPD 1.31 ISS Cross Wire Jumper Cable for Flight 6A

I&O 1.32 Fluid Line Anchor patch Torque Testing

OPD 1.33 Design and Fabrication of Beta Gimbal Assembly Thermal Blankets

I&O 1.34 S0 Module to Truss Structure Strut Deployment Test

OPD 1.35 Flight ULF-1 Assembly Critical Spares

OPD 1.36 Flights 9A through 11A EVA Removable Multi-Layer Insulation
Covers

OPD 1.37 Development of Wireless Video System Video Stanchion Support
Assembly FSE

OPD 1.38 Functional Equivalent Unit Enhanced MDM Solid State Mass Memory
Upgrade

OPD 1.39 Pump Package Assembly Acoustic Improvement Kit

**I&O 2.0 Sustaining Engineering Support**

I&O 2.1 Engineering Support

I&O 2.1.1 Flight Operations Support

I&O 2.1.2 Anomaly Resolution

I&O 2.1.3 Analytical Tool/Models

I&O 2.2 Engineering Analysis

I&O 2.2.1 Final Acceptance Review Support

I&O 2.3 Drawings and Documentation

I&O 2.4 Facilities and Support Equipment

I&O 2.5 ISS/Shuttle Integration/De-integration

I&O 2.6 Hardware History Retrieval System

I&O 2.7 Design Knowledge Capture

**I&O 3.0 Post Production Support**

I&O 3.1 Requirements

I&O 3.1.1 Logistics Engineering (LE)

I&O 3.1.2 Material Management (MM)

I&O 3.1.3 Depot Maintenance and Repair (DM&R)

I&O 3.2 Planning and Reporting

**I&O 4.0 Multi-Element Integration Testing**

######## EXHIBIT D

**INTRODUCTION**

General Scope

**SECTION I - SUSTAINING ENGINEERING**

1.0 General Scope

2.0 Definition

3.0 Tasks

4.0 Data Requirements (DR's)

**SECTION II - MULTI-ELEMENT INTEGRATED TESTING**

1.0 General Scope

2.0 Description

3.0 Tasks

4.0 Data Requirements (DR's)

**SECTION III - LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE (L&M) POST-PRODUCTION**

**SUPPORT (PPS)**

1.0 General Scope

2.0 Definition

3.0 Tasks

4.0 Contract Deliverables/Data Requirements (DR's)

####### SECTION IV -- TECHNICAL DEFINITION 

1.0 General Scope

2.0 Definition

3.0 Tasks

4.0 Data Requirements (DR's)

####### 

####### 

####### 

####### SECTION V -- OTHER ENGINEERING SUPPORT 

1.0 General Scope

2.0 Definition

3.0 Tasks

4.0 Data Requirements (DR's)

**EXHIBIT A**

**STATEMENT OF WORK**

**[INTRODUCTION]{.underline}**

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the work to be accomplished by the
Prime Contractor in the development of the International Space Station
(ISS).

**[SCOPE]{.underline}**

This SOW describes the Contractor requirements for the design,
development, manufacture, integration, test, verification, and delivery
to NASA of the U.S. On-Orbit Segment, including Ground Support Equipment
(GSE); and for support for ground and orbital operations. The Contractor
will provide technical support and data for NASA\'s operation and
utilization of the ISS. The SOW also describes the Contractor
requirements to integrate the complete ISS System.

The completion of open DDT&E work (i.e., closing out of ship short
items, open paper, forward work, etc.) after provisional acceptance
(DD250) will be performed under DDT&E.

**[KEY TERMS]{.underline}**

Key terms for this SOW are defined as follows:

[Component.]{.underline} A functional unit which is an entity for
purposes of analysis, manufacturing, testing, maintenance, and
record-keeping (e.g., batteries, electronic boxes) \[SSP 41171\].

[Configuration Item/Computer Software Configuration Item
(CI/CSCI)]{.underline} Hardware or software (or an aggregation of both)
designated by the contracting agency for configuration management.

[Contingency Kits/Items.]{.underline} Items that are not part of the
original design of a CI/CEI/Element/Segment but developed as operational
needs of the ISS mature or are positioned on ISS as risk mitigation
tools (e.g. the Ammonia Servicer, jumper kits).

[Contract End-Item (CEI).]{.underline} Hardware or software (or an
aggregation of both) identified in the contract as a deliverable entity.
A CEI may be a separate Cl or CSCl, or an aggregate of CIs/CSCIs grouped
as a set.

[Element.]{.underline} An integrated, assembled set of hardware and/or
software capable of supporting an operational role such as the U.S. Lab
module. It is the primary subdivision of the ISS Vehicle for purpose of
accommodation in the Shuttle for on-orbit assembly.

[Flight Support Equipment (FSE)]{.underline}. An item required to
integrate ORU/Contingency Items into/onto the carrier used in the
shuttle payload bay or any pressurized volume which is transported to
orbit by a launch vehicle (e.g. adapter plates, shrouds).

[Government Furnished (GFE) Elements.]{.underline} The ISS GFE flight
elements are the centrifuge Accommodations Module (CAM); the crew Return
Vehicle (CRV); Resource Node 2, Cuploa, and Resource Node 3.

[Ground Support Equipment (GSE).]{.underline} Equipment required to
support launch processing and post landing operations (e.g. dollies,
lifting devices, slings).

[International Partners/Participants.]{.underline} Those non-U.S. space
agencies that formally participate in the ISS. The International
Partners are CSA, ESA, NASDA, and RSA. ASl is an International
Participant.

[ISS System.]{.underline} The composite of hardware, software,
facilities, personnel, and services needed to perform the ISS mission.
This includes on-orbit, ground, and International Partner/Participant
assets. ISS System requirements are specified in SSP 41000.

[Launch Package.]{.underline} The collection of elements, including
orbital and flight support equipment, to be launched on any given
assembly flight.

[Nominal.]{.underline} The expected value or condition, as measured in
terms of functional or performance characteristics, of a component,
subsystem, or system operating normally in its intended environment.

[Orbital Replacement Unit (ORU).]{.underline} Equipment that may be
removed from the on-orbit ISS and replaced with a like unit for
maintenance activities.

[Operational Item]{.underline}. Equipment, miscellaneous in nature, but
required to ensure the integrity, performance and use of the ORU or
Contingency Kit/Item while on-orbit, as applicable through the phases of
the International Space Station applicable to cycling an ORU/Contingency
Item to orbit, deploying it on-orbit, recovering the ORU/Contingency
Item it is replacing back to the return carrier, and returning that
ORU/Contingency Item to ground (a.k.a. mission phases) (e.g. bump
protectors and connector protective covers).

[Orbital Support Equipment (OSE),]{.underline} An item required to
support Flight hardware in the On-orbit ISS. OSE items are required to
accommodate integrated assemblies used to deliver ORU/Contingency Items
to/from on-orbit worksites and on-orbit storage locations (e.g.
micro-meteoroid debris protection).

[Part.]{.underline} A single piece not normally subject to disassembly
without destruction or impairment of use (e.g., resistors, transistors,
relays, gears, etc.).

[Segment.]{.underline} A grouping of elements that are functionally
related and often physically interface (e.g., U.S. On-Orbit Segment or
U.S. Ground Segment).

[Stage.]{.underline} The elements comprising the orbital vehicle at a
given point in the assembly sequence. Each stage begins with orbital
insertion of a flight containing Vehicle elements.

[Subsystem.]{.underline} A functional grouping of components that
combine to perform a major function (e.g., electrical power, attitude
control, propulsion, etc.).

[Support Equipment.]{.underline} An item required to transport, access,
handle, protect, service, or verify a qualification/flight item.
Equipment included in the category of Support Equipment is Ground
Support Equipment, Flight Support Equipment, Orbital Support Equipment,
and Operations Items.

[Sustaining Engineering.]{.underline} Sustaining Engineering (SE) is the
design engineering expertise provided after the development of
hardware/software items is completed and these items have been
provisionally accepted.

[United States On-Orbit Segment (USOS)]{.underline}. An Earth orbiting
facility which houses experiment payloads, distributes resource
utilities, and supports permanent human habitation for conducting
research and science experiments in a microgravity environment. The USOS
supplies the ISS with services and capabilities as specified in SSP
41162.

[Vehicle.]{.underline} The on-orbit Space Station configuration
exclusive of the external interfaces defined in SSP 41000.

[Verification.]{.underline} The process for demonstrating compliance
with the ISS System and U.S. On-Orbit Segment Specifications. For the
ISS System Specification-level verification, this includes interfaces
with the International Partners/Participants and U.S. Ground Segments.

**1.0 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS)**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall be responsible for design, analysis,
verification and delivery of the U.S. On-Orbit Segment except for Node
2, which shall be Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

I&O b. The Contractor shall be responsible for analytical integration of
the ISS System. The Contractor shall be responsible for integration and
verification of the ISS Vehicle as defined by SSP 41000. The Contractor
shall technically penetrate into International Partner/Participant
design, development, verification processes, and fabrication to the
extent required to ensure physical, functional, safety, and operational
compatibility at the element-to-element interface within constraints of
the Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), Intergovernmental Agreements
(IGAs), and Joint Management Plans (JMPs). The Contractor shall
technically penetrate into GFE element design, development, verification
processes, and fabrication to the extent required to ensure physical,
functional, safety, and operational compatibility at the
element-to-element interface within the bounds of the SOW. The
Contractor shall be responsible for system performance as set forth in
clause B.4.

I&O c. The Contractor shall provide Government Furnished Equipment
(GFE)/Government Furnished Data (GFD) Integration, including:

1\. Maintaining GFE status and schedule visibility.

2\. Providing a single point of contact for NASA/Boeing GFE
coordination.

**1.1 ISS ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION** (WBS 1.1)

I&O The Contractor shall be responsible for overall ISS System analysis,
integration, and issue resolution within the scope of this SOW.

**1.1.1 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS** (WBS 1.1.1)

I&O a. The Contractor shall define and allocate system-level functional
and performance requirements. The Contractor shall identify and resolve
requirements issues across the ISS System except for facilities (other
than defined in this SOW), personnel, and services.

I&O b. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain the
following specifications:

> ISS System Specification (DR MG02).

I&O c. The Contractor shall develop and document International
Partner/Participant Segment Specifications (DR VE08). The Contractor
shall maintain or support International Partner/Participant maintenance
of International Segment Specifications in accordance with DR VE08.

I&O d. The Contractor shall assess the suitability of the Androgynous
Peripheral Attachment Systems (APAS), as defined by the APAS Procurement
Specification (JSC 26938), for its intended ISS use. The assessment
shall determine if the APAS Procurement Specification (meets/exceeds,
does not meet, or is not applicable to) the allocated requirements from
the PMA-1 (S684-10115C) and PMA (SP-M-301F) Specifications. The
Contractor shall identify the APAS data required for integrated
verification of the PMA, PMA-1, US On-orbit Segment, and ISS System. The
Contractor shall provide a documented summary of this assessment
including the "does not meet" finding, and participate in an APAS
Assessment Review Meeting upon completion of the assessment to formulate
resolution/action plans.

I&O e. The Prime contractor shall provide the following to NASA as part
of the NASA ICM development effort:

I&O 1. The Contractor shall perform an integrated flight safety hazard
analysis of the ICM (to be launched on flight 2A.X after March 2000) to
support a phase 2/3 Flight Safety review on November 15, 1999. The Phase
3 portion of the review shall be limited to verification associated with
the ICM vehicle. NASA will ensure that the necessary vehicle data and
support are provided by the ICM vehicle developer to support the
integrated analysis.

I&O 2. The contractor shall analyze FGB/ICM heat exchange across the
passive Androgenous Peripheral Attachment System (APAS) and submit
findings in contractor format via Houston.

I&O 3. The contractor shall provide engineering support for resolution
of ICM interface and requirements issues. Contractor support shall
include preparation of high level plans and schedules and providing
technical assistance as required.

I&O f. The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Establish an RTM Class for SSP 54500;

I&O (2) Rebuild SSP 54500 Tables and Figures for Interleaf/RTM;

I&O (3) Type the SSP 54500 document into the RTM database;

I&O (4) Update the SSP 54500 class for the three SCNs, SCN 001, (SSCN
315), SCN 002 (SSCN 336), and SCN TBD (SSCN 773),

I&O (5) Link the SSP 54500, section 3.2.1.x through 3.6 requirements to
the SSP 41000 requirements;

I&O (6) Link the SSP 54500 requirements invoking applicable documents to
the reference class;

I&O (7) Link the SSP 54500, section 3 requirements to the SSP 54500,
section 4 verification;

I&O (8) Extract traceability reports and documents, and provide them to
NASA in contractor format for comparison to the original documents plus
SCNs from NASA.

I&O g. The Contractor shall document Node 2 and Node 3 specifications in
accordance with DR VE08.

I&O h. The Contractor shall provide the capability to maintain
specifications and ICDs by incorporating approved changes. This includes
contractor controlled and Government controlled contractor documentation
(i.e. post allocated-baseline transfer).

I&O i. For non-Prime changes, the Contractor shall review, coordinate,
and update the ISS technical baseline utilizing necessary resources to
maintain (book manage) the technical baseline and assure it agrees with
NASA documents, ISS interface Control Documents (ICDs) external to the
USOS segment, Government Furnished Equipment ICDs, specifications, and
exceptions to SSP 41172. In addition, during this maintenance activity,
the contractor shall review non-prime NASA controlled and maintained
documentation and changes to insure that these type of changes do not
impact or violate overall ISS requirements.

**1.1.2 VERIFICATION** (WBS 1.1.2)

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain a
comprehensive verification and certification process that will verify
the ISS system complies with the requirements in SSP 41000. The
Contractor shall develop, document, implement, and maintain a
comprehensive verification and certification process that will verify
the ISS System complies with the requirements in SSP 41000. In
performing this task, the Contractor shall:

I&O **Reserved**

I&O (2) Perform technical coordination with CSA, ESA, NASDA, ASI, and
RSA for all integration and verification tasks required to implement the
Bilateral Integration and Verification Plans (BIVPs). This activity
shall include Contractor performance of the verification tasks
envisioned in the BIVPs for performance by the U.S. Government, to the
extent that the Contractor shall act as NASA's agent to assess the
verification processes of the International Partners/Participants in
accordance with agreed to process sampling criteria (i.e., reviews,
plans, procedures, test conduct, and reports).

I&O (3) Analytically certify compliance with SSP 41000 using best
available data.

I&O b. The contractor shall develop and document a Program Master
Integration and Verification Plan (DR MG05).

**1.1.3 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT** (WBS 1.1.3)

I&O a. The Contractor shall establish and implement a system to
identify, define, control, and verify the ISS System configuration in
accordance with the ISS Program Configuration Management Requirements
(SSP 41170).

I&O b. The Contractor shall implement the Program's configuration
management process, including the following:

(1) Board preparation

(2) Minutes

(3) Action tracking

(4) Change management

(5) Configuration status

(6) Files/documentation maintenance

(7) Configuration audits.

I&O c. The Contractor shall document and process for approval waivers
and deviations to contract or program requirements to meet the intent of
MIL-STD-480.

I&O d. The Contractor shall establish, maintain, and utilize a
configuration status accounting system capable of providing status of
all configuration items.

I&O e. The Contractor shall control and status the as-designed and
as-built configuration through CI/CSCI acceptance.

I&O f. The Contractor shall provide support to NASA for controlling
on-orbit Vehicle configuration.

I&O g. The Contractor shall develop and maintain a program documentation
tree to include all contract technical and programmatic documentation.

I&O h. The Contractor shall perform a data management function to
schedule, format, manage, deliver, and retain the contract data and
program-level documents. Develop and maintain a Data Accession List (DR
PC14) that lists all Engineering Release Unit (ERU) internally released
documentation generated by the Contractor, Product Groups, and their
Suppliers in support of the work effort defined in this SOW.

I&O i. The contractor shall develop and provide documentation in
accordance with SSO 50010-01, Volume 1.

I&O j. The contractor shall maintain stage drawings by incorporating
NASA approved changes affecting: stage drawing trees; stage top assembly
drawing and parts list; and on-orbit installation drawings and parts
lists.

**1.1.4 PROGRAM INTEGRATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT** (WBS 1.1.4)

The Contractor shall implement a Program Integration and Risk Management
System as follows:

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop, maintain, and report an Integrated
Risk Posture (DR RM02) that shall include an evaluation of all program
risk categories. These categories shall be defined as technical,
programmatic, supportability, safety, cost (development and life cycle),
and schedule.

I&O b. The Contractor shall develop and implement a process to
integrate, track, and report program activities to support development
of the program-level risk posture. This process shall include:

> \(1\) Issues and change packages requiring program-level decisions
> have program-coordinated assessments of impacts and risk implications
> to cost, schedule, and technical performance.
>
> \(2\) Identification and storage of risk items.

I&O c. The Contractor shall develop a Program Integration and Risk Data
Management system capable of maintaining a record of program-level
actions, responses to external action items, and program risk data.

I&O d. The Contractor shall define a set of quantitative program metrics
to provide trend analyses to predict threats to cost, schedule, and
technical performance.

I&O e. The Contractor shall develop and document quantitative analytical
tools to facilitate the management decision process for risk
identification, assessment, and mitigation processes.

5.  **International Software Provider**

I&O The Contractor shall assist NASA in the coordination of technical
and programmatic efforts between U.S. and international software
provider organizations to support timely delivery and proper performance
of international provider software. This shall include assistance in
coordinating, conducting and providing inputs for reviews, meetings (at
both US and International locations) and telephone conference calls,
support for coordinating requirement change requests, evaluation of
schedule change requests, assistance in technical issue resolution, risk
assessment and progress reporting.

**1.2 PROGRAM CONTROL AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT** (WBS 1.2)

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop program control and business
management processes and systems necessary to plan, implement, control,
and assess the Prime contract effort and perform the reporting as
defined in the Data Requirement Descriptions (DRDs).

I&O b. The Contractor shall perform technical definition of Government
requested changes and proposal preparation of Government approved
changes.

I&O c. Technical Definition - The contractor shall perform technical
studies and evaluations to resolve implementation issues and the
addition of new contract scope. A Space Station Change Memorandum (SSCM)
will be prepared documenting the contractor\'s technical approach and
schedule.

I&O d. Cost Estimates and Proposal Preparation - The contractor shall
submit proposals. Proposal preparation activities will commence once a
change directive has been signed, receipt of a request for proposal,
UCA, or as directed by NASA.

**1.2.1 PROGRAM PLANNING AND CONTROL** (WBS 1.2.1)

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop and maintain the Program Work
Breakdown Structure (WBS) and WBS Dictionary (DR PC01).

I&O b. The Contractor shall develop and implement the program planning
and control process.

I&O c. Deleted

I&O d. The Contractor shall develop, maintain, and assess all ISS
program schedules to the appropriate level of the Program Work Breakdown
Structure (WBS). All team schedules related to the performance of this
contract shall be part of an integrated scheduling system that includes
planning data from all program participants. The Contractor shall
provide an integrated program schedule (DR PC06) that assures that
Program Schedules are consistent with budget targets and with the major
program milestones.

I&O e. The Contractor shall use performance metrics program-wide to
effectively measure, trend, and report against established baselines.

I&O f. The Contractor's program management shall be responsible for
maintaining communication channels with NASA program management, and
maintaining external communication plans.

**1.2.2 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT** (WBS 1.2.2)

I&O a) The Contractor's program management shall effect proper financial
control disciplines throughout the program for early identification and
resolution of potential threats to program success, and assure
compliance with Federal financial reporting requirements.

I&O b) The Contractor shall define, develop, and maintain a financial
management system for the accumulation, analysis, and documentation of
cost and staffing data to the appropriate level of the Prime Contract
portion of the Program WBS. The Contractor shall provide and maintain
*an* Earned Value Measurement System (EVMS) to provide an assessment of
the integrated cost and schedule performance data in accordance with the
Contractor's NASA-approved systems. The Contractor shall provide a EVMS
plan and reports (DR PC07).

3.  **INFORMATION SYSTEMS** (WBS 1.2.3)

I&O a) The Contractor and subcontractors shall use information systems
that are compatible with the ISS Program Information Systems Plan. The
Contractor and subcontractors shall be able to access the ISS computer
systems defined in the Program Information Systems Plan at the Johnson
Space Center to deliver and retrieve information electronically.

I&O b) The Contractor shall provide an initial data submittal to support
the Information Technology (IT) planning process. The initial submittal
shall include an inventory of all IT purchased for and directly charged
to the contract. The submittal shall also include all IT planned for
purchase along with the rationale and justification for those purchases.
As new/future requirements are identified the contractor shall submit
with its request, pursuant to the general provisions of the contract,
the rationale and justification for the new/future requirements.

4.  **Software Engineering Institute Certification**

I&O The Contractor shall define a process, develop a plan and implement
the plan to meet the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) guidelines for
level five software control.

**1.2.5 -- 1.2.17....Reserved**

3.  **VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT** (WBS 1.3)

The Contractor shall:

DDT&E a) Design, develop, verify, fabricate, and deliver the U.S.
On-Orbit Segment, except for Node 2, and FGB that meet the requirements
of SSP 41162 and SSP 50128 respectively.

I&O b) Integrate USOS Contract End-Items (CEIs) into Launch Packages
which shall be compatible with incremental on-orbit assembly and U.S.
launch vehicle capabilities, and shall be consistent with the
Multi-Increment Manifest Document (SSP 50110).

I&O c) Analytically integrate all ISS Launch Packages, including
International Partners/Participants, into Stages.

I&O d) Derive requirements to enable each on-orbit stage to operate and
to support subsequent assembly operations.

DDT&E e) Provide USOS support equipment required for flight software,
flight hardware, assembly, servicing, handling, check-out, and
maintenance during launch processing and on-orbit operations.

DDT&E f) Provide MIL-STD-1553 data bus cables and coupler sets to RSA as
defined in the DIL for integration into the Service Module and the FGB.

DDT&E g) Node 2 of the USOS will be provided by NASA as GFE.

OPD h) Provide USOS support equipment, as identified in paragraph 1.5.8
and subparagraphs, required for the processing of spare parts for
on-orbit flight hardware from launch processing/Shuttle integration,
on-orbit de-integration, on-orbit handling and storage, on-orbit
recovery and integration into the Space shuttle, and on-the ground
de-integration.

**1.3.1 VEHICLE ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATION (VA&I)** (WBS 1.3.1)

I&O a. The Contractor shall define, analyze, and verify ISS Vehicle as
defined in SSP 41000 functional capabilities and performance using best
available data. The Contractor shall define, and analyze ISS Vehicle
functional capabilities and performance as defined by SSP 41000. This
activity shall include periodic design assessments to show buildup to
the Certificate of Flight Readiness (CoFR) for the ISS Vehicle as
defined in SSP 41000 using best available data. The Contractor shall
follow the process used for the CoFR as documented in SSP 50108
"Certification of Flight Readiness Process Document."

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall assess Contract End-Item (CEI) performance
to show compliance with the requirements of SSP 41162 and the capability
to interface with other ISS segments.

**1.3.1.1 Subsystem Architecture and Analysis** (WBS 1.3.1.1)

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Define, develop, and maintain the end-to-end subsystem hardware,
software, and firmware architecture and topology (including partitioning
and allocating subsystem functions, requirements, and interfaces to the
end-item level) for the U.S. On-Orbit Segment that comply with the
requirements of SSP 41162. The architecture and topology shall be
compatible between subsystems and across elements.

I&O b. Through coordination with the International Partners/Participants
and NASA Ground Segment participants, define, develop, and maintain the
end-to-end subsystem architecture and topology (including partitioning
and allocating subsystem functions, requirements, and interfaces to the
segment-level) for the International Partners/Participants, USOS, GFE
Elements and U.S. Ground Segments that comply with the requirements of
SSP 41000.

I&O c. Define and maintain an Integrated Signal List (ISL) (DR VE28) for
the ISS Vehicle as defined in SSP 41000.

I&O d. Define and maintain an end-to-end hardware and software
architecture that satisfies the failure tolerance requirements of SSP
41162.

I&O e. Conduct and document analyses to verify that the connectivity
portion of the VMDB represents the as-built U.S. On-Orbit Segment.

I&O f. Conduct and document analyses to verify that the connectivity
portion of the VMDB reflects the ISS Vehicle as defined in SSP 41000
end-item channelization requirements.

I&O g. Conduct and document on-orbit Vehicle failure assessment analyses
for each ISS Vehicle as defined in SSP 41000, including assembly
operations. Conduct and document on-orbit Vehicle failure assessment
analyses for each post flight 17A contract end-item including assembly
operations.

I&O h. Establish the process for verifying analytical models to be used
across the program to identify, list, verify, validate, and ensure
consistency of verification and integration analyses across all
organizations.

I&O i. Define and maintain power quality standards for the Vehicle
except the Russian segment. This shall include the power consumer
interfaces and constraints required to maintain power quality. For the
GFE elements and the International Partners/Participants, this shall be
limited to that definition at the USOS interface required for total ISS
System Specification performance.

I&O j. Integrate passive Thermal Control functions across the U.S.
On-Orbit Segment and provide thermal environments data.

I&O k. Analyze the end-items to demonstrate integration of the human
engineering design across the U.S. On-Orbit Segment, except Node 2,
including internal and external crew interfaces and tasks, and worksite
integration. Prime shall determine the Primary Translation Path Corridor
on the GFE provided Node 2 to ensure that the USOS Translation Path is
continuous.

I&O l. Define and maintain a robotics systems integration standard. The
Contractor shall analyze robotic systems used on the Vehicle that
interfaces with the USOS hardware in accordance with SSP 41000 and
appropriate Contract End-Item (CEI) specifications. The Contractor shall
analyze the ability of the ISS and Shuttle robotics systems, in
conjunction with the on-orbit robot compatible berthing mechanisms and
related cue systems, to support assembly of the Vehicle. The Contractor
shall analyze the capability of the U.S. and CSA robotics to place
external payloads in all external payload positions except on the
Russian segments. The Contractor shall analyze the ability to perform
maintenance on the USOS and support GFE element and International
Partners/Participants' maintenance through interface definition. The
Contractor shall perform integrated performance analyses for Vehicle
robotic operations including kinematics, and operations assessments for
Vehicle assembly, maintenance, and payload handling using best available
GFE elements and International Partner/Participant-provided (GFD)
models.

I&O m. Conduct end-to-end analyses to support extravehicular activity
(EVA) for USOS, except Node 2, and interfaces between International
Partners/Participants and the USOS; and interfaces between the GFE
elements and the USOS.

I&O n. Define Station Management & Control (SMC) methodologies and
requirements (DR VE07) and shall:

I&O (1) Perform Vehicle and subsystem Failure Detection, Isolation, and
Recovery (FDIR) analyses for the ISS Vehicle as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O (2) Perform assessments of all telemetry and data passing through
the USOS.

I&O (3) Provide USOS Vehicle-to-ground and external USOS command and
control interface requirements.

I&O (4) Provide USOS Vehicle-to-crew command and control interface
requirements.

I&O o. Develop a Software Development Plan (DR VE29) consistent with
DOD-STD-2167 and the Software Standard Procedures Specification.

I&O p. The contractor shall develop an external ammonia ion gauge leak
locator specification in accordance with VE07. As a part of this effort,
the contractor shall review existing requirements, review current design
data, conduct trade studies, and submit requirements for a leak locator
assuming minimal or no modifications to existing design.

I&O The contractor shall document the feasibility of using the leak
locator within the existing design. The contractor shall provide a
presentation documenting the trade studies, proposed requirements, and
options resulting from the tasks performed support of this effort. The
contractor shall identify potential cost, weight, power, volume, and
schedule impacts resulting from modifications to accommodate the leak
locator. The contractor shall submit electronic and hard copy versions
of the presentation in contractor format. Electronic copies shall be
compatible with MS Word version 5.1, excel version 4.0, or Mac Draw Pro
1.5v2.

I&O The contractor shall support follow on questions and tasks relating
to this effort through October 30, 1995.

I&O q. For the Russian Service Module the Contractors shall accomplish
the following:

\(1\) Provide a one-time update to the Russian Service Module thermal
control system models for the organic silicon loop and internal water
glycol loop to the latest system designs.

\(2\) Perform a one-time thermal analysis of the Russian Service Module
thermal control system using updated models and map minimum assured heat
rejection capability at flights 1R, 6A, 9A.1 and assembly complete over
the entire range of possible beta angles and attitudes.

(3) Provide analysis results and conclusions to the Government in
    contractor's format.

I&O r. Provide support to NASA for end-to-end design analysis and
verification analysis of the ISS video system. Total labor hour
expenditure for this effort shall not exceed 0.50 equivalent persons
during the period beginning July 15, 1998 and extending through July 15,
2000.

I&O s. The Contractor shall perform integrated analysis of the CAM, CRV,
and Re-phased Hab to identify any interface, safety, operational, or
performance incompatibilities between these GFE elements and the ISS
System.

I&O t. Provide technical expertise for end-to-end design analysis,
verification analysis and test and evaluations of the ISS audio, video
and space-to-space systems, space to ground systems, including
Government Furnished and International Partner systems.

**1.3.1.2 Vehicle Analysis** (WBS 1.3.1.2)

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Conduct and document per the VAC process integrated configuration
and performance analyses of the ISS Vehicle as defined by SSP 41000 and
SSP 41162.

I&O b. Conduct analyses to identify and document interim assembly stage
nominal capabilities. The Contractor shall document and retain
requirements rationale. Derived requirements shall be documented in the
appropriate Contract End-Item (CEI) specifications (DR VE07). The
Contractor shall resolve any issues identified as a result of these
analyses.

I&O c. Integrate the requirements and design of all elements, including
those provided by NASA and the International Partners, and perform
end-to-end analyses of the vehicle and its integrated subsystems.

I&O d. Provide analysis and data inputs to the Multi-Increment Manifest
Document SSP 50110.

I&O e. Analyze First Element Launch (FEL) through Vehicle Assembly
Complete to determine that each stage will operate and support
subsequent assembly operations.

I&O f. Prepare, implement, and maintain a plan for development and
control of ISS Vehicle structural design loads and provide load reports
(DR VE12).

I&O g. Analyze ISS System performance with the induced effects of the
Space Shuttle Orbiter and other International Partner/Participant
Earth-to-orbit vehicles during proximity operations and mated conditions
to evaluate ISS System functionality and performance (DR VE23). The
Contractor shall resolve any ISS Vehicle, as defined by SSP 41000,
issues identified as a result of these analyses.

I&O h. Prepare, implement, and maintain a plan for development and
control of ISS Vehicle thermal elements integration and integrated
thermal performance analyses (DR VE15).

I&O i. Develop and maintain the Microgravity Control Plan (DR VE16) for
the ISS Vehicle. Implement the Microgravity Control Plan (DR VE16) for
the ISS Vehicle, as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O j. Develop, implement, and maintain the Fracture Control Plan for
the USOS (DR VE26).

I&O k. Conduct and document analyses to support the NASA planning for
early ingress to the ISS for flights 2A, 3A, and 4A.

I&O n. The Contractor shall conduct analysis, test, and inspections of
the USOS exposed external equipment to determine M/OD induced functional
failures of the critical hardware on S0, S1, P6, and Z1. The contractor
shall identify potential hardware solutions needed to reduce risk to the
vehicle. The contractor shall document analysis, test, inspection and
potential hardware modifications in subcontractor format, and deliver
the results to the Government.

I&O o. Conduct and document an integrated analysis of ATV and HTV
on-orbit configuration requirements and interfaces to identify any
interface, safety, operational, or performance incompatibilities between
these vehicles and the Vehicle. Analysis shall be based on the best
available GFD.

I&O p. The contractor shall support the Government in assessing
off-nominal assembly scenarios and operational risk mitigation
activities.

**1.3.1.2.1 On-Orbit Check-Out: Development of ISS Program Policy and
PMI & VP Update**

I&O The Contractor shall develop: (I) in concert with NASA, an update of
the Program Master Integration and Verification Plan (PMI & VP)
establishing the policy and concept for identifying and defining
on-orbit check-out requirements, (ii) a joint program directive by which
to implement the PMI & VP policy and requirements, and (iii) "from/to"
revisions of all Class I controlled documents affected by the PMI & VP
update. (Note: Implementation of the program on-orbit check-out policy
will be by contract action separate from which authorized the work
described immediately above.)

**1.3.1.2.2 Propulsion Module Design and Implementation and Long Lead
Development (SSCN 1813)**

I&O The Contractor will complete requirement definition, initiate
development of an overall program operating plan and support NASA in
developing a phased acquisition approach for the Propulsion Module.
Additionally, the Contractor will accomplish long lead design, initiate
ICD development, finalize procurement specifications and complete study
effort in preparation for, but not including, long lead item
procurement.

**1.3.1.3. Vehicle Integration** (WBS 1.3.1.3)

I&O The Contractor shall perform: engineering planning, vehicle
definition, engineering data management, interface definition, and
resource management as defined in the following paragraphs.

**1.3.1.3.1 Engineering Planning**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Develop and implement an Engineering Management Plan for the U.S.
On-Orbit development program.

I&O b. Develop, implement, and maintain a system-level Design Review
Plan that defines the schedules, products, and processes required to
implement design reviews that will support the incremental launch and
assembly of elements and subelements.

I&O c. Develop, integrate, and maintain Vehicle engineering milestones
to be input into the Integrated Program Schedule (DR PC06).

**1.3.1.3.2 Vehicle Definition**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. **Reserved**

I&O b. Develop and maintain the USOS element-level functional interfaces
and Vehicle topology.

I&O c. Develop the ISS System top-level assembly drawings for each stage
of the ISS Vehicle.

DDT&E, I&Od. Prepare, maintain, and submit engineering drawings in
accordance with DR PC05.

Spares, OPD

I&O e. Develop and maintain a Vehicle indentured parts list (DR VE32)
for the ISS Vehicle, as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O f. Provide Stage Interconnect Diagrams (VE36) thru Flight 6A.
Provide Integrated Functional Schematics as described in DR VE36 for the
ISS Vehicle.

I&O g. Provide On-orbit Stage Configuration Drawing, showing the stage
complete configuration of Contractor provided USOS end items with
on-orbit installed and removed items accounted for within the drawing,
in accordance with DR PC25.

I&O h. Provide Stage Drawing Tree with IPL for each stage in accordance
with DR PC25.

I&O i. Provide On-orbit Installation Drawings for Contractor and
Government provided hardware and software in accordance with DR PC25.

I&O j. Provide On-orbit Installation Drawings for Government provided
hardware and software in accordance with DR PC25.

I&O k. Provide On-orbit Interface Equipment Installation Drawings for IP
provided hardware and software interfacing On-orbit to Contractor
hardware and software in accordance with DR PC25.

I&O l. Provide On-orbit Installation Drawings for IP provided berthing
element hardware in accordance with DR PC25. These drawings shall be in
accordance with DR 25, except IP Element to Element Drawing Interface
will not be shown, installation and assembly constraints will be
omitted; and the drawing package will not be complete for the purpose of
establishing configuration identification of the IP segments.

**1.3.1.3.3 Engineering Data Management**

I&O The Contractor shall capture, store, integrate, and deliver to NASA
the Vehicle safety and engineering data needed for ISS Vehicle
integration and operations in the Vehicle Master Data Base (VMDB).
Scope, content, and functionality shall be in accordance with DR VE32.
The Contractor shall maintain change control of the data within the
VMDB. The Contractor shall accommodate presentation of data in both
English and Metric Units in the VMDB. Data which is not stored as
numerical tabular data within the VMDB will not be converted, such as
drawings and performance data.

I&O The Contractor shall capture, store, and integrate the best
available GFD Vehicle safety and engineering data needed for post ISS
DIL Vehicle integration and operations in the Vehicle Master Data Base
(VMDB). Scope, content, and functionality shall be in accordance with DR
VE32. The Contractor shall maintain change control of the data within
the VMDB. The Contractor shall accommodate presentation of data in both
English and Metric Units in the VMDB. Data, which is not stored as
numerical tabular data within the VMDB, will not be converted, such as
drawings and performance data.

**1.3.1.3.4 Interface Definition**

I&O a. The Contractor shall define, document, and maintain inter-segment
interfaces as assigned in SSP 30459 (DR VE05). The Contractor shall
support development of GSE-to-facilities interfaces and GFE interfaces.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall define, document, and maintain the
element-to-element, element-to-GSE/facilities, and software interface
requirements and interface design implementation for the U.S. On-Orbit
Segment (DR VE06).

**1.3.1.3.5 Resource Management**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Develop, track, maintain, manage, and control the allocation of
Vehicle technical resources including establishment of program technical
reserves.

I&O b. Report the status of technical resources of the ISS Vehicle.

I&O c. Establish, track, and maintain Technical Performance Measures
(TPMs) to provide assessments of program performance versus engineering
requirements.

**1.3.1.4. Vehicle Effectiveness** (WBS 1.3.1.4)

I&O a. The Contractor shall implement a EEE and Mechanical parts
management function as defined in SSP 30312. The Contractor's parts
management processes shall control parts activities from design and
development through use and maintenance. As-designed and as-built parts
lists shall be accessible in electronic format.

I&O b. The Contractor shall implement a materials and processes control
function as defined in SSP 30233. The Contractor shall develop,
implement, and maintain the Materials Identification Usage List (MIUL)
(DR VE09) and Materials Usage Agreements (MUAs) (DR VE10).

I&O c. The Contractor shall perform Vehicle risk analyses to identify
risk probabilities, risk consequences, and risk abatement strategies.

I&O d. The Contractor shall implement a natural and induced environments
control program consistent with the environment requirements defined in
SSP 41000. The environments control program shall include radiation
characterization testing.

I&O e. The Contractor shall develop and implement an Effectiveness
analysis tool for conducting trade analyses. Factors shall include
performance, risk, cost, and schedule. Performance criteria shall be
derived from the performance requirements of SSP 41000.

**1.3.1.5 Vehicle Verification** (WBS 1.3.1.5)

DDT&E The Contractor shall develop, document, implement, and maintain a
comprehensive verification and certification process that will
demonstrate that the USOS complies with SSP 41162.

I&O a) The contractor shall develop, document, implement, and maintain a
comprehensive verification and certification process when integrated
with the certified International Partner/Participant segments, certified
GFE elements, and U.S. Ground segments, the assemblage complies with SSP
41000.

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Implement the Program Master Integration and Verification Plan
(DR MG05) for the ISS System, as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O (2) Develop and implement the Integration and Verification
Implementation Plan (I&VIP) for the ISS Vehicle, as defined by SSP
41000.

I&O (3) Develop and implement a verification process beginning with
requirement verification and ending with formal closure, certifying
specification compliance, and execution of assembly and checkout for the
ISS System, as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O (4) Develop, document, and manage specification verification
requirements (DR VE20) for the ISS System as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O (5) Develop, implement, and maintain a Program Verification
Information System (PVIS) database as defined in the Program Master
Integration and Verification Plan (DR MG05). This requires performing
the following tasks:

I&O (a) Develop the PVIS Process document and PVIS Software Requirements
document and maintain the PVIS Process document.

I&O (b) Develop a requirements traceability for the ISS System and U.S.
On-Orbit Specifications (DR VE24).

I&O (c) Develop verification traceability reports for the ISS System and
U.S. On-Orbit Segment Specification (DR VE24). Traceability shall be
through closure for the ISS System as defined by SSP 41000.

I&O (d) Provide traceability to closure for Assembly, Checkout,
Operations, Maintenance, and Configuration Requirements items in PVIS
(DR VE 24).

I&O b. The Contractor shall be responsible for test operations by
providing requirements, plans, procedures, and reports; and performing
integrated test and checkout activities in accordance with the Program
Master Integration and Verification Plan, D684-10020-1.\*

\*Note: Documents referenced in this document shall not be considered
applicable to this contract.

I&O c. The Contractor shall implement the Bilateral Integration and
Verification Plans for CSA, ESA, NASDA, ASI, and RSA.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall show compliance with SSP 41162.

I&O The contractor shall support an Ammonia Verification test of the
Moog built Fluid Quick Disconnect Coupling (FQDC) at the NSLD Ammonia
Boiler System Facility in Cape Canaveral, Florida. PG2 (MOOG) is
required to monitor the test set up and test, and to additionally
provide the following hardware: vacuum canister, valve actuation torque
wrench, and tools for the insertion of the valve into the canister.

DDT&E e. In support of the Robotic Workstation (RWS) and Artificial
Vision Unit (AVU) Government Furnished Material, the Contractor shall be
responsible for installation of RWS and AVU components, and associated
cable, wire, connectors, and connector pins in the USL and Node 1. The
Contractor shall also be responsible for performing continuity tests of
related wiring, and verification of satisfactory RWS equipment power up
for USL and Node 1 equipment.

I&O f. The Contractor shall physically verify all Flight 2A-7A element's
interfacing cable umbilicals and fluid lines/IMV ducting which are mated
to a corresponding ISS element for the first time on-orbit. (This
specifically includes Node 1/MPLM, Node 1/Cupola, PMA-2/Node 2,
Lab/SSRMS (PDGF and electrical interface) and Lab/UHF Antenna as
Government Furnished Equipment.)

I&O g. The Contractor shall perform, and document results of element
cable and fluid mate, demate, and fit checks for all flight elements
available through the contract period.

**1.3.1.6 Vehicle Requirements** (WBS 3.1.6)

I&O The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain a complete
specification definition of the U.S. On-Orbit Segment and its elements,
including Ground Support Equipment (GSE), Flight Support Equipment
(FSE), and Orbital Support Equipment (OSE) (DRs VE02, VE07).

**1.3.1.6.1 Robotic Workstation**

I&O The Contractor shall support NASA development of a draft Government
Furnished Material (GFM) prime item development specification to define
the Space Station Robotic Workstation

**1.3.1.7 Vehicle Test**

I&O The Contractor shall perform the Joint U.S./Russian Audio Test to be
conducted in the engineering laboratories of the Marshall Space Flight
Center (MSFC) Audio Lab in Huntsville, AL. NASA will provide access to
the MSFC Audio Lab and the following Russian hardware for the test:

1 - Commutator Switch (development)

2 - User Panels (development)

1 - Power Cable with end interfacing to U.S. provided power sources
(unterminated)

1 - audio interface cable unterminated at the FGB to PMA interface plain
end and built to flight cable length

2 - headsets

\- all necessary Russian-to-Russian test and signal cabling

As a part of this effort the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Provide a test director to be in charge of the test, facilitate
the test conduct, and to ensure safe and expedient test completion.

I&O b. Develop a test procedure for the Joint U.S./Russian audio test.

I&O c. Provide the following hardware of engineering development model
fidelity or greater for the test:

1 - Russian Audio Interface Unit (RAIU) Part number 3000002-102

2 - Audio Terminal Unit Part number 3000001-102

1 - Internal Audio Controller Part number 3000016-102

1 - Audio Bus Coupler Part number 3000005-102

2 - Headset Part number PC-01/NASA

2 - Headset Control Unit w/extension cable Part number 386-28015-1

1 - Audio Test Set Part number 3000020-101

1 - Set of external (Lab type) power supplies for U.S. and Russian
provided hardware

1 - Set of connector sufficient to terminate the power supply end of the
Russian power cable to the Lab power supplies

1 - Connector pair for the audio interface at the FGB/PMA interface
plane

1 - Audio interface cable unterminated at the FGB to PMA interface plane
end and built to flight cable length

1 - Power and signal cable sets (including power bus bars and all
required connectors) required to power and connect all U.S. hardware

I&O d. Coordinate with NASA to determine test readiness.

I&O e. Test for the following parameters as specified in the current
versions of SSP 42121 and Harris RAIU type B2 specification B3000002 at
the time of the test, measured at each interface or receiving unit, as
appropriate:

> \(1\) Signal Type
>
> \(2\) Signal levels (Audio and Push to Talk)
>
> \(3\) Amplitude Frequency Response
>
> \(4\) Signal to Noise Ratio
>
> \(5\) Crosstalk
>
> \(6\) Distortion
>
> \(7\) Signal Isolation

I&O f. Demonstrate the following:

I&O (1) Proper operation of audio in both directions when loud
annunciation keying lines are asserted (on).

I&O (2) Proper operation of audio in both directions when loud
annunciation keying lines are not asserted (off).

I&O (3) Russian selection, termination and initiation of audio links.

I&O (4) U.S. selection, termination and initiation of audio links.

I&O g. Test for distribution of audio signals originating from the
Russian segment within the USOS.

I&O h. Evaluate test results and determine test success based on
compliance with the signal levels as specified in SSP 42121 and an audio
quality Diagnostic Rhyme Test (DRT) score of no less than 95 percent.

I&O i. Prepare a test report which documents test results, test success,
and anomalies or deficiencies in the hardware design based on the test
results.

I&O j. Submit one electronic and two paper copies of the test report
written in contractor format no later than 4 weeks after the test
completion. The electronic versions shall be compatible with MS Word
version 5.1 or Excel version 4.0.

**1.3.1.7.1 Vehicle Test**

For the Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit, the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Provide technical support for installation instructions and
operational instructions for the use of the Development Verification
Test Model (DVTM) Space to Ground Transmitter Receiver Controller
(SGTRC) in support of engineering tests/evaluations in Electronic
Systems Test Laboratory (ESTL) at NASA JSC.

I&O b. Provide for the shipping and transportation of the DVTM SGTRC
(PG-1 produced development unit part number 10033649-501, S/N 001), and
its associated connector saver (PG-1 produced development unit part
number ENG-970403, S/N 001), to NASA JSC (ESTL). The DVTM SGTRC is to be
provided on loan to the ESTL from 30 Mar 98 to 30 Apr 98, inclusive. The
DVTM SGTRC will then be returned in an \"as is\" condition to Boeing HB.

I&O c. Provide support to define the interfaces for the installation of
the Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit, GFE unique ID number
306621, into the USL rack LAP-1 location cavity.

I&O d. Install the Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit onto the USL
at payload express rack location LAP-1 cavity per GFD installation
instructions. The Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit will be
considered a user payload.

I&O e. Check out the Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit after the
installation into the USL per GFD checkout procedures.

I&O f. Conduct the previously planned functional USL EMC test, with the
Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit installed and operating in the
USL at *the* payload express rack location LAP-1 cavity. This test will
be conducted at KSC. The intent of this test is to access the EMI and
EMC environment of the USL with an operating Ku-band Forward Link
Communications Kit installed.

I&O g. Remove the Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit from the
payload express rack location LAP-1 *cavity*, per GFD removal
instructions, and confirm that the functionality of the USL has not been
changed.

I&O h. Provide a test report, in contractor format, within 90 days of
completion of the installed Ku-band Forward Link Communications Kit EMI
and EMC test.

8.  **Shuttle Avionics Integration Laboratory (SAIL) Testing** (WBS
    1.3.1.8)

I&O The Prime Contractor shall demonstrate generic hardware and software
compatibility between the cargo element, ISS Vehicle, as defined by SSP
41000, configurations, shuttle avionics, and mission control, via
testing in the Shuttle Avionics Integration Lab. (SAIL) facility. The
Prime Contractor shall prepare the test requirements and objectives and
shall support SAIL engineering in test plans and procedures preparation,
test readiness reviews, and test conduct. The Prime Contractor shall
lead in resolution of anomalies that are determined to be attributed to
the ISS flight system or ISS support equipment

I&O a) For the 2A cargo element, three tests will be conducted, the
first using early, the second using interim, and the third using flight,
software loads for the shuttle and formal qualification tested node
control and mission control software.

**1.3.1.9 Joint C&DH Tests**

I&O The Prime Contractor shall support the Joint NASA/NASDA C&DH
Interface Test of the NASDA/JEM interface in a series of two Development
tests at the NASDA TKSC facility in Japan. This testing will be
conducted in the engineering laboratories of NASDA TKSC, Japan. NASA
will provide coordinated contractor access to the NASDA facilities.

I&O The Contractor shall provide C&DH hardware, specialized test
equipment, and hardware vendor support.

As a part of this effort the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Provide a test coordinator for the test preparation, test
conduct, and test analysis.

I&O b. Evaluate NASDA Provided Test Plans, Test Procedures, Summary
Report and Problem Report(s).

**1.3.1.10 Early Communications System**

I&O The Prime contractor shall provide support to NASA's integration of
the Early Communication (ECOMM) GFE Kit into ISS Node 1. The GFE Early
Communication kit is to be integrated by NASA into the Space Station as
follows:

Description Quantity Location

Command and Telemetry Processor (CTP) 1 Node 1 - Interior

RF Switch 1 Node 1 - Interior

Portcom Transceiver 1 Node 1 - Interior

Antenna Group (Antenna and Ballstack mast) 2 Node 1 - Exterior (hatch)

EVA Change-out Mechanism Socket\* 2 Node 1 - Exterior (hatch)

RF and multi-pin signal feed-through connectors\* 8 Node 1 - feedthrough
plate

Cable harnesses Node 1 - Interior and Exterior

\* GFE delivered to and installed by Prime or Product Groups prior to 2A
launch.

I&O The Prime contractor shall provide the following support of the
ECOMM GFE kit integration into Node 1:

I&O ECOMM Prime Project Management;

I&O Communication System engineering support for ECOMM GFE kit and
project;

I&O Delta Operational Review (Flight x Flight) for Flight 2A with ECOMM
GFE kit installation included;

I&O Product assurance support for testing, for safety assessments, for
design, and for receiving inspections;

I&O Development and maintenance of ECOMM equipment to Space Station
ICD(s);

I&O Support integration of the ECOMM GFE kit into the Node 1 ISS data
system by providing: architecture definition and documentation,
operations support, conduct/document software and software compatibility
testing, software ICD and IPCL development/modification, and ECOMM data
interface design support;

I&O Support ECOMM Cargo Element Testing;

I&O Update Space Station resources to reflect all additional resources
required by ISS because of the addition of ECOMM; the additional
resources will be provided by NASA;

I&O Support for integration of the ECOMM GFE kit into the Node 1 ISS
Electrical Power System (EPS) by providing architecture definition and
documentation, perform power system analysis using ECOMM ORU models,
model development, impedance testing, and conduct/document power system
compatibility testing at SPEL;

I&O Node 1 thermal data and thermal analysis support for ECOMM
installation and EPS utilization.

I&O Support, with NASA, the development of a plan to replace feed
through plates with original glass windows on-orbit and to deliver
replacement procedures, windows, and equipment.

**1.3.1.10.1 Enhanced Simulation for the SVF - The ECOMM CTP Simulator**

I&O For the Space Station Early Communications System (ECOMM) Command
and Telemetry Processor (CTP) Simulator for the Software Verification
Facility (SVF), the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Install two GFE Bit Synchronization Units (unique ID \# 106097)
and a GFE Ethernet Interface (Ethernet Boards Combination 10BASE2/T,
unique ID \# 106098) for the SVF to support the addition of the GFE
enhanced CTP Simulator Software (unique ID \# 106099) into the SVF, in
accordance with Test Preparation Sheet (TPS) procedures. This
installation is of a temporary nature, analogous to the temporary
installation of ECOMM onboard the ISS. This equipment shall be removed
prior to ISS Assembly Complete, and the SVF restored to its operating
state.

I&O b. Verify, per ECOMM CTP checkout procedures, that the installation
of the enhanced CTP Simulator Software for ECOMM and associated
equipment will operate with the SVF while the SVF is standalone, and
then also while the SVF is interfaced with the Mission Control
Center-Houston.

I&O c. Document the results of the ECOMM CTP installation checkout*.*
This documentation for the closure of this TPS task will be available
upon request, in contractor format, no earlier than 30 days after
completion of the checkout.

I&O d. Update the Technical Task Agreement (TTA) JSC-EV-19, and update
SSP 50026-01 and SSP 50026-02 to reflect the new equipment items.

**1.3.1.10.2 Deleted**

**1.3.1.11 Extravehicular Activity Hardware Testing**

The Contractor shall provide design and fabrication of HTV hardware and
technical expertise for testing planning, setup, execution, analysis and
issue resolution for Human Thermal Vacuum testing at the Johnson Space
Center.

**1.3.1.12 EVA AIT**

I&O The contractor shall support NASA in coordination, management, and
implementation of the seven added NBL tests and provide a single point
of contact for the Prime product centers. The seven tests are as
follows:

Test #1 Flight 8A SO Truss

Test #2 Flight 5A & 6A Lab Module

Test #3 Flight 8A & 9A S0 & S1 Truss CETA Cart

Test #4 Flight 8A & 10A Rigid Umbilicals Node 2

Test #5 Flight 8A & UF2 MT & MBS

Test #6 Flight 9A S1 Truss

Test #7 Flight 12A P3/P4 Truss

I&O **1.3.1.12.1 NBL EVA Testing**

a.  The Contractor shall support the Government in coordination,
    management, and implementation of the following NBL tests.

    Test #1 Flight 1E APM (Columbus)

    Test #2 Flight 9A S1 Assembly and Maintenance

    Test #3 Flight 10/10A.1 Node 2/Propulsion Module

    Test #4 Flight 20A Node 3

    Test #5 Flight 10A/20A Node 2/3/Hab tray

### Test #6 Flight UF-1 ORU maintenance {#test-6-flight-uf-1-oru-maintenance .unnumbered}

Test #7 Flight 14A Cupola

b.  Using Government provided data the Contractor shall confirm that GFE
    mounted on Contractor cargo elements are properly located during NBL
    EVA testing.

c.  Using Government provided data, the Contractor shall perform the
    following in support of NBL development tests involving non-prime
    cargo elements:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Provide EVA translation path information.

2.  Provide relative placement geometry between hardware elements for
    the test configuration relative to the specific test objectives.

3.  Provide confirmation that Contractor provided hardware installed on
    non-prime elements is properly mocked up to allow for EVA worksite
    NBL evaluation.

4.  Conduct reviews prior to test of the Contractor provided equipment
    used on non-prime assemblies.

**1.3.1.12.2 EVA Evaluation and Test**

I&O The contractor shall support the Government in coordination,
management, and implementation of EVA evaluation and tests involving
contractor, IP, and GFE hardware.

**1.3.1.12.3 EVA/EVR Training Support**

I&O The contractor shall support the Government development of crew
training hardware for EVA and

EVR activities.

**1.3.1.13 Pressurized Logistics Module (PLM) Hatch Operations Kit
(PHOK)**

I&O The contractor shall support NASA KSC in the development of a
Pressurized Logistics Module (PLM) Hatch Operations Kit (PHOK) by:

I&O a. Reviewing existing KSC analysis and note acceptable support
equipment to flight hardware interface attachment points. The contractor
shall provide electronic and hard copy versions of the results to KSC no
later than July 1, 1998. Electronic copies shall be compatible with MS
Word version 5.1 and Excel version 4.

I&O b. Performing loads analysis with the hatch model and verify support
equipment structural loads to the hatch structure are within the hatch
structural load capacity. The contractor shall provide electronic and
hard copy versions of the results to KSC no later than July 1, 1998.
Electronic copies shall be compatible with MS Word version 5.1 and Excel
version 4.

I&O c. Supporting KSC CDR of the PHOK by attending the CDR, reviewing
the CDR packages, and generating Review Item Discrepancy/Dispositions.

**1.3.1.14 Addition of Class H Bonding Straps to Hatches of Node 1**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall install two GFE provided Class H Bonding
Straps, GFE unique ID \# 106100, one each to the Port and Starboard
hatches of Node 1 in accordance with GFD installation drawing
instructions. These straps will safely electrically ground the hatches
to the structure. The

port-side hatch is not intended to be opened after the complete
installation (i.e. the fastening of both ends) of the bonding strap. The
starboard-side bonding strap will only have one of the two ends
installed at this time (the other end will be fastened by the on-orbit
crew).

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall verify that the installed straps meet the
requirements of a class H bond in accordance with SSP 30245, paragraph
3.2.1.1.1.

DDT&E c. The contractor shall update Node 1 drawings and associated
documentation to reflect the two GFE provided Class H Bonding Straps
installed on the Node 1 Port and Starboard hatches.

**1.3.1.15 MT T0 MBS Mechanical Interface Test**

I&O The contractor shall support the Mobile Transporter (MT) to Mobile
Based Systems (MBS) mechanical interface test at Spar Aerospace in
Brampton, Ontario. The support shall consist of:

I&O (1) preparing the MT Primary Structure and Zero-g Support Equipment
(ZSE) without the Load Transfer Units (LTU) and Linear Drive Unit (LDU)
for transfer to the test site by NASA provided transportation;

I&O (2) providing masses simulating LTUs and LDU to achieve proper
balance during MT handling;

I&O (3) providing a procedure to Spar for handling the MT, installing
the MT on the ZSE, and operating the ZSE;

I&O (4) reviewing and providing written comments to the final Spar MT to
MBS mechanical I/F test procedure;

I&O (5) participating in a maximum of six test planning telecons each
lasting a maximum of four hours starting approximately eight weeks prior
to test start;

I&O (6) providing a maximum of four people to participate in a single,
three-day technical interchange meeting at Spar Aerospace in Brampton,
Ontario;

I&O (7) providing a maximum of three people to participate in a two day
test readiness review at Spar Aerospace in Brampton, Ontario;

I&O (8) providing a maximum of four people for two weeks of 5 days per
week, eight hours per day period for on-site support of MT & ZSE during
MT to MBS interface test.

**1.3.1.16 MT To MBS Interface Electrical Continuity Test**

I&O The contractor shall support the electrical continuity test for the
MT to MBS interface at Spar Aerospace in Brampton, Ontario. The support
shall consist of:

I&O (1) reviewing the Spar provided test procedures for continuity tests
on 1553 harnesses and video lines;

I&O (2) reviewing and providing comments to final Spar Aerospace
electrical test procedure;

I&O (3) participating in a maximum of six test planning telecons each
lasting a maximum of four hours each starting approximately eight weeks
prior to test start;

I&O (4) providing a maximum of four people to participate in single,
three-day technical interchange meeting prior to the test at Spar
Aerospace in Brampton, Ontario;

I&O (5) providing adapters to connect to MT wire harnesses during
continuity tests;

I&O (6) providing a maximum of four people for two weeks of 5 days per
week, eight hours per day period for support of continuity tests
including ensuring proper hook up to MT harnesses, direct hands on
technician operations on MT hardware, and reviewing and approving any
real time procedural changes;

I&O (7) providing a maximum of three people to participate in a two day
test readiness review at Spar Aerospace in Brampton, Ontario. After the
test the Contractor shall prepare MT and ZSE for return to PG-1 by NASA
provided transportation.

**1.3.1.17 Russian/American Convertor Unit (RACU) Test Support**

I&O Provide engineering support during TIMs and telecons for the purpose
of integrating the RACU into the Spacehab module. Provide engineering
support during activation of the RACU on-orbit.

**1.3.1.18 Z1 Jumper Cables**

**1.3.1.18.1 DDCU**

DDT&E a) The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test and
deliver Z1 Jumper Cables to the Government. The Z1 Jumper Cables provide
for partial restoration of power to Node 1 in the event of loss of
either Z1 DC-to-DC Converter Units (DDCU).

DDT&E b) The Z1 Jumper Cables shall:

> \(1\) reroute electrical power from the Z1 patch panel X1 to the
> Secondary Power Distribution Assembly (SPDA) Z1-4B in the event of
> failure of the Z1 DDCU-4B
>
> \(2\) reroute electrical power from the Z1 patch panel X2 to the SPDA
> Z1-3B in the event of failure of the Z1 DDCU-3B
>
> \(3\) be EVA installable and removable.
>
> \(4\) be suitable for their intended temporary use on orbit as a
> failure work around.

DDT&E c) The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain the Z1
Jumper Cable documentation in accordance with DR PC05.

DDT&E d) The Contractor shall conduct a Critical Design Review with the
Government prior to design release for manufacturing. The Critical
Design Review is limited to a drawing review.

DDT&E e) The Contractor shall perform a fit check of the Z1 Jumper
Cables to the Space Station equipment. The Contractor shall document the
test results in contractor format and deliver to the Government within
60 days of completion of the test.

DDT&E f) The Contractor shall perform a system level functional test
using simulated Z1 Jumper Cables in the Space Power Electronics Lab
(SPEL). The Contractor shall document the test results in an Engineering
Report and deliver to the Government within 60 days of completion of the
test.

DDT&E g) The Contractor shall develop, document in contractor format,
and deliver the Z1 Jumper Cable Weightless Environment Training Facility
(WETF) test plan to the Government 90 days prior to the planned Z1
Jumper Cable WETF test.

DDT&E h) The Contractor shall conduct a Z1 Jumper Cable WETF Test
Readiness Review (TRR).

DDT&E i) The Contractor shall provide Z1 Jumper cables for a WETF test
at JSC in the first quarter of the calendar year 1998.

DDT&E j) The Contractor shall conduct the Z1 Jumper Cable WETF test at
JSC during the first quarter of calendar year 1998.

**1.3.1.18.2 RACU Restart Cables**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test and deliver
RACU Re-Start Cable 1 and Cable 2. The RACU Re-Start cables shall
provide for restart of a P6 power channel following a shutdown of both
P6 power channels.

**1.3.1.18.3 Cross Channel Connect (CCC) C-Jumper**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test and deliver
the CCC C-Jumper. The CCC C-Jumper shall provide the capability for the
primary power output of a good channel to power-up the DCSU in a bad
channel.

**1.3.1.18.4 Secondary Power Feedback Jumper**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test and deliver
the Secondary Power Feedback Jumper. The Secondary Power Feedback Jumper
shall provide the capability for the P6 DDCU output of a good channel to
power the P6 PFCS of a bad channel.

**1.3.1.19 KSC Altitude Chamber Reactivation and Element Level Leak
Test**

I&O For the KSC Altitude Chamber Reactivation and the Element-Level Leak
Tests of the USL and the US Airlock:

I&O a. The contractor shall conduct a Helium compatibility analysis and
assessment of the USL and the US Airlock equipment. This analysis and
assessment will be used for the development of an element-level leak
test plan. The analysis and assessment will also determine the
percentage of Helium, as measured by volume at 20 degrees Centigrade,
for the Helium and Air gas mixture to be used as a leak-check medium at
14.7 psig.

I&O b. The contractor shall provide a test director to be in charge of
the KSC Altitude Chamber Reactivation characterization Test, and the
Element-Level Leak Tests of the USL and the US Airlock.

I&O c. The contractor shall generate test plans and procedures which
include leak isolation and data recording techniques, instrumentation,
sensors, operations, and the KSC support requirements.

I&O d. The contractor shall conduct a Test Readiness Review (TRR) for
each test.

I&O e. The contractor shall conduct a characterization Test at KSC using
O&C altitude chamber to validate that the reactivated O&C Altitude
Chamber is operational.

I&O f. The contractor shall conduct an element level leak test on the
pressurized configuration of both the USL and on the US Airlock in the
O&C Altitude Chamber at KSC, using a 14.7 psig Helium and Air mixture as
a leak detection medium to measure the leak rate of each module.

I&O g. After test completion the contractor shall return each
pressurized element to flight condition.

I&O h. For the characterization test and each pressurized element test
*at KSC,* the contractor shall provide a test report to the government,
in contractor format within 90 days of completion of each test.

I&O h. The contractor shall identify the leak test pass/fail criteria
for each pressurized element, based on the specified leak rate, and on
the analytical model for the Helium and Air gas mixture leak check
medium at 14.7 psig.

**1.3.1.20 MSS Control Equipment End-To-End Video Operations Test**

I&O The Contractor shall be responsible to perform the Mobile Servicing
System (MSS) Control Equipment End-to-End Video Operations Test (MEVOT)
to be performed in the Software Verification Facility (SVF) at the
Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas.

I&O The MEVOT is a minimal test bed setup because the Extravehicular
Robotics (EVR) hardware, Artificial Vision Unit (AVU), Remote Work
Station (RWS) Control Electronics Unit (CEU) hardware, Command & Data
Handling (C&DH) hardware and Command and Control (C&C) MDM software are
already installed. The MEVOT will test the performance of the PG-1,
PG-3, and Canadian Space Agency (CSA) video hardware together as one
comprehensive system, as well as ability to function with the Prime
developed C&C MDM software.

I&O As part of the MEVOT effort the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Provide the following hardware of identified fidelity or greater
for the test in the SVF, during the approximate period from January 1998
to August 1998.

  ------- --- ------------------------------------------ -----------------
  I&O     1 - External Video Switching (EVSW),           P/N10033180-501
              Protoflight Model, with Connector Saver    
              (C/S) and attached cabling to the C/S. The 
              cabling coming out of the C/S includes all 
              the fiber optic lines (10 feet long).      

  I&O     1 - External TV Camera Group (ETVCG),          P/N10033194-501
              Protoflight Model, with Connector Saver    
              and attached cabling to C/S. The ETVCG     
              includes a TV Camera Interface Converter   
              (TVCIC), a Pan Tilt Unit (PTU), and a TV   
              Camera                                     

  I&O     1 - Video Sub-System Test Set (VDSSTS), Test   P/N10039232-501
              Support Equipment                          
  ------- --- ------------------------------------------ -----------------

I&O b. Provide additional hardware as identified in the Contractor
Furnished Equipment Lists (CFEL) for the test in the SVF, during the
approximate period of from January 1998 to August 1998.

I&O c. Provide test readiness assessment and coordinate with NASA.

I&O d. Provide demonstration testing of the following:

\(1\) MCE and Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) Video
performance

\(2\) Demonstrate closed loop functionality of the MSS Control Equipment
to ISS and MSS Cameras, video feedback from cameras, and video software
testing

\(3\) Video routing through MSS/ US On-orbit Segment (USOS) interfaces

\(4\) Measure CSA to USOS video transmission quality end-to-end for a
worst-case link

I&O e. Test the video signal distribution, originating from the external
video camera.

I&O f. Provide test anomaly investigations associated with supplied
subsystems and hardware (item a. above).

**1.3.1.21 KU-Band Antenna Reflection Masking Software**

DDT&E For Ku-band antenna masking software in the Command & Control
(C&C) Software:

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall provide a maximum of 1280 Labor Hours (LH)
for technical meeting support regarding C&T hardware, firmware,
communications coverage and communications degradation due to Ku-band
antenna software masking, and for supporting analysis to ensure that all
requirements are met and all constraints are considered.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall include Ku-band Antenna Masking as part of
the Electronic Systems Testing Laboratory (ESTL) Ku-band Testing Plan,
and will deliver this test plan document to the Government, in
Contractor format, prior to initiation of the test. The test will
demonstrate control of Ku-band antenna through the Space-to-Ground
Transmitter Receiver Controller (SGTRC) MIL STD 1553B interface in
accordance with enforced masks and limits during the hardware and
software integration testing at the ESTL in Houston. The Ku-band antenna
will not actually be part of the test configuration; only commands and
responses will be observed with the SGTRC.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall include Ku-band Antenna Masking as part of
the Test Readiness Review (TRR) to be held for the Ku-band ESTL HSI
Testing.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall conduct the Ku-band Antenna Masking Test
as part of the Ku-band ESTL Testing Plan (described above) at the ESTL
in Houston.

DDT&E e. The Contractor shall implement masks in the Command and Control
Software (CCS) software as part of CCS R1 release.

DDT&E f. The Contractor shall deliver to the Government in Contractor
format via contract letter, the results of the Ku-band Antenna Masking
Test (which is only a portion of the Ku-band ESTL Hardware Software
Integration Test Report), within 90 days of completion of the Ku-band
Antenna Masking Test.

**1.3.1.22 Addition of OSE Window Protective Covers for the ISS and
Testing of Window**

**Scratch Panes**

DDT&E For the addition of OSE Window Protective Covers for the ISS, the
Contractor shall:

DDT&E a. Provide clear plastic Window Protective Covers for both sides
of the Hatch Windows and for the normally pressurized side of the Module
Windows; they are to be installed on-orbit using hook-and-loop fasteners
(Velcro).

DDT&E b. Classify the clear plastic Window Protective Covers as OSE.

DDT&E c. Perform the following acceptance test on all Scratch Panes.
Each Scratch Pane shall be mounted in a flight-like frame and a static
load of 187.5 lb. normal to surface applied to the pane over a one inch
diameter circle. Visual inspections, continuity, and resistance tests

DDT&E shall be performed before and after each test. The Scratch Pane
shall be considered acceptable when the inspection does not show visible
delamination of the pane, heater/bussbar, or RTD, and the tests show the
heater/bussbar and RTD have maintained electrical continuity and are
within their acceptable resistance tolerance band.

DDT&E d. Provide a test report to the Government, in contractor format,
within 30 days of completion of the Scratch Pane tests.

**1.3.1.23 Power Data Grapple Fixture Cable Harness Installation and
Analysis**

DDT&E The Contractor shall perform the analyses required to allow ground
installation of the Power Data Grapple Fixture (PDGF) Cable Harness to
the USL. The required analyses shall include structural and thermal
analyses of the launch environments, and
envelop/interference/accessibility analyses.

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide any additional interface hardware on
the USL required, based on the analyses performed, to enable the PDGF
Cable Harness to be pre-installed on the USL.

DDT&E The Contractor shall ground-install the PDGF Cable Harness on the
USL.

**1.3.1.24 Russian Thermal Model Development and Support**

I&O The Contractor shall develop, document in contractor format, support
TIMs and telecons with the Russians, and deliver via contracts letter no
later than 9/30/98 an ISS Thermal Math Model (TMM) for use by RSC-E for
their verification of thermal performance of the Russian elements.

**1.3.1.25 ACBM to Berthing Plate Integration Design**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a) Perform a one time design of the ACBM installation based on GFD
provided Alenia design models for each unique Node 2 berthing plate
including: wire harness routings, wire harness clamp locations and clamp
call-outs, and clamp installation point hole/insert locations. The
Contractor shall provide the ACBM installation design drawings to the
Government in accordance with DR PC05 within 120 days after receipt of
the Alenia design model.

I&O b) Provide support/services as follows:

I&O (1) participate in technical interchange meetings and telecons with
the Government and Alenia,

I&O (2) identify concerns and issues with the Alenia berthing plate/ACBM
installation design,

I&O (3) identify concepts and solutions to resolve the identified
concerns and issues,

I&O (4) determine if the identified solutions and concepts would
invalidate the ACBM qualification data,

I&O (5) provide a report documenting how the identified solution/concept
invalidates the ACBM qualification data (if implemented) to the
Government in contractor format within 45 days after agreement on the
solution/concept with Alenia,

I&O (6) implement those solutions/concepts which allow the ACBM
qualification data to remain valid, and

I&O (7) update the documentation impacted by the implementation of those
solutions/concepts which allow the ACBM qualification data to remain
valid.

I&O c) Review the GFD provided Alenia berthing plate drawing(s), which
have been revised to include the ACBM installation design drawings to
insure proper incorporation of the ACBM installation design. Provide a
Berthing Plate ACBM Incorporation Report documenting the acceptability
of the incorporation of the ACBM installation design into the Alenia
Berthing Plate drawings and any issues and concerns to the Government
within 120 days after receipt of the revised berthing plate drawings.

**1.3.1.26 Installation of Forward Stovepipe**

DDT&E The Contractor shall enhance the Forward Stovepipe (a debris
shield and thermal protective cover for the CBM interface between Node 1
and PMA 2, eventually the interface between Node 1 and the USL)
installation by removing the rivets and replacing them with twelve 0.25
inch bolts and twelve nut plates around its circumference. The
enhancement shall include the procurement of the bolts and nut plates,
hardware modification to accommodate the installation of the nut plates,
and update the drawings as required.

**1.3.1.27 Analysis of the ORUs and Worksites for Robotic Use**

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform a one time SPDM grasp fixture to ORU
and worksite structural analysis of the ORUs and worksites listed below
when a combined force of 50 lbf and bending moment of 173 ft-lbf is
applied to the ORU grasp fixture.

> **Affected ORU and Worksites**
>
> MCF to RPCM
>
> RPCM to worksite on Z1
>
> Micro to BCDU
>
> BCDU to worksite
>
> MCF to 6B
>
> 6B to worksite

I&O (1) For the structural analysis, the primary grasp fixture shall be
the location of load application for those ORUs having multiple grasp
fixtures.

I&O (2) For the structural analysis, the worksite hardware to be
analyzed will consist of the robotic alignment guides associated with
each ORU and other structure that is within 2 inches of the ORU or the
SPDM arm during the insertion and removal process when outside the
capture envelope of the robotic alignment guides.

I&O (3) For the structural analysis, the force may be applied in any
direction.

I&O b. The Contractor shall provide to the Government in Contractor
format the SPDM grasp fixture to ORU and worksite structural analysis
report for the above ORUs and worksites outlining

expected response to applied loading conditions, ORU grasp fixture
bending stiffness when the ORU is attached to ISS, and calculated
margins and factors of safety, the ORU and worksite models used and a
report of how the analysis was conducted. If load capacity is less than
the specified analysis load conditions, provide the actual load
capability as part of the analysis report.

I&O c. The Contractor shall perform a one time offset tool and grasp
fixture to ORU structural analysis of the BCDU when the SPDM experiences
a failure while engaging and actuating the secondary fastener of the
ORUs with the offset tool.

I&O (1) For the analysis, assume the SPDM will apply a maximum force of
50 lbf in any direction and a bending moment of 173 ft-lbf to the offset
tool grasp fixture if the offset tool is rigidly constrained. and the
SPDM socket, which engages the collocated offset tool fastener head is
held rigid.

I&O (2) The analysis will use the relative geometry between the offset
tool and grasp fixture to be engaged to determine the location and
magnitude of loads imparted into the ORU resulting from the SPDM
imparted loads described above. The analysis will identify the
applicable load path during the different phases of tool to secondary
fastener engagement.

I&O d. The Contractor shall provide to the Government in Contractor
format the offset tool and grasp fixture to ORU structural analysis
report for the BCDU outlining the expected response to applied loading
conditions and calculated margins and factors of safety, the ORU
structural models used and a report of how the analysis was conducted.
If load capacity is less than the specified analysis load conditions,
provide the actual load capability as part of the analysis report.

I&O e. The Contractor shall perform a one time SPDM to ORU and worksite
impact structural analysis to determine the effect of a 5 Joule impact
from the SPDM on the ORUs and associated worksites listed below when the
ORU is structurally attached to the worksite.

> RPCM and worksite on Z1
>
> BCDU and worksite
>
> 6B and worksite

I&O (1) For the analysis, assume that impact energy is applied over a
0.25 square inch contact area to the grasp fixture, the ORU structure
within a 2 inch radius circle centered about all grasp fixtures used for
equipment handling, and the worksite structure within 2 inches of the
SPDM arm during nominal operations.

I&O (2) The analysis will use the offset to grasp fixture geometry to
determine appropriate impact contact area and location for all ORUs
utilizing grasp fixtures only associated with fastener operations or
fluid quick disconnect mating.

I&O f. The Contractor shall provide to the Government in Contractor
format the SPDM to ORU and worksite impact structural analysis report
for above ORUs and worksites outlining expected response to applied
impact energy and calculated margins and factors of safety. If the
impact energy capability is less than 5 joules, report will document the
actual impact energy capability.

I&O g. Contractor shall perform a one time ORU to worksite impact
structural analysis to determine the effect of a SPDM induced 5 Joule
impact between the ORU and associated worksites listed below as the SPDM
installs and removes the ORU.

> RPCM to worksite on Z1
>
> BCDU to worksite
>
> 6B to worksite

I&O (1) The worksite hardware to be analyzed consists of the robotic
alignment guides associated with each ORU and other structure that is
within 2 inches of the ORU during the insertion and removal process when
outside the capture envelope of the robotic alignment guides.

I&O h. The Contractor shall provide to the Government in Contractor
format the ORU to worksite impact structural analysis report for above
ORUs and worksites outlining expected response to applied impact energy
and calculated margins and factors of safety. If the impact energy
capability is less than 5 joules, the report will document the actual
impact energy capability.

I&O i. The Contractor shall perform a one time grasp fixture structural
analysis of the grasp fixtures listed below. The analysis shall be
conducted in two parts. The first part shall consider the effects of a
5J impact to the fixture. The second will analyze fixture response to a
combined force and moment application.

P/N

R076707

R077483

I&O (1) For the analysis an impact energy of 5 Joules is applied to the
grasp fixture surfaces which interface with the SPDM. Assume a contact
area of 0.25 square inches.

I&O (2) For the second analysis a force of 50 lbf is applied to the
grasp fixture in any direction.

I&O (3) For the second analysis a bending moment of 173 lb-ft is applied
to the fixture in combination with the force.

I&O j. The Contractor shall provide to the Government in contractor
format the grasp fixture structural analysis report for above grasp
fixtures outlining expected fixture response to applied loading
conditions and calculated margins and factors of safety. If load
capacity is less than specified load conditions, the report will
document the actual load capability.

I&O k. The Contractor shall perform all the tasks in a-j no later than
120 days after the implementation of this change is approved.

**1.3.1.27.1 EVR Evaluation**

I&O The Contractor shall perform a Dexterous Target Survey and Grasp
fixture fit check for all International Space Station elements
containing Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM) compatible
equipment, and develop and maintain a database of the target survey
digital imagery and Fit Check results.

**1.3.1.28 Robotic Target Samples**

I&O a. The Contractor shall provide flight quality samples of the
targets identified below to the Government for not more than six months
along with all the applicable identification, traceability information,
and handling procedures to maintain equipment certification status.

I&O P/N

> E039937, E039956, E039954 (4x), MS24693-C17 (4x) Target, SSU, Assy of
>
> R071331 Target, Telerobotic-ECU, Assy of
>
> R078102 or R078115 Status Indicator, Front-Assy , Status Indicator,
> Rear-Assy
>
> R078148 Visual Target Assy -- RPCM

1.  **Dexterous ORU Robotic Test Articles**

I&O The Contractor shall provide ORU robotics test articles used in SPDM
task verification and on-orbit anomaly resolution activities.

**1.3.1.29 Wireless Video System Test**

I&O 1) The Contractor shall develop a Wireless Video System (WVS) test
plan, and submit to the Government for approval 60 days prior to testing
start date. The WVS test shall include testing the GFE WVS to ensure the
WVS conforms to the physical and electrical interface in accordance with
SSP 42159, the WVS will function when supplied with power from the
existing Space Station Video ports in accordance with SSP 42159, the WVS
will respond to commands in accordance with SSP 50002, and the WVS
telemetry output conforms with the video vertical interval in accordance
with SSP 50002.

I&O 2) The Contractor shall provide the Government with a Video Switch
Unit Engineering Model, part number 3000008-101 and a Sync and Control
Unit Engineering Model, part number 1360AE7010-102 for WVS development
during the 1st quarter, Calendar Year 1999 for up to 180 days .

I&O 3) The Contractor shall conduct a one day WVS Test Readiness Review
at JSC.

I&O 4) The Contractor shall set up the WVS at the ISS System Integrated
Laboratory (ISIL) Facility in accordance with GFE WVS installation and
checkout procedure, using the GFE WVS, and Contractor provided Space
Station Video ports.

I&O 5) The Contractor shall conduct a WVS test at the ISIL Facility
using the GFE WVS, and contractor provided Space Station Video port
during the 4th quarter, Calendar Year 1999.

I&O 6) The Contractor shall prepare and deliver to the Government a WVS
test report in contractor format within 60 days after completing the WVS
test.

**1.3.1.30 Ammonia Tank Assembly (ATA) Support of UF-4 Spacelab Pallet
(SLP) Integration Activities**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Perform a structural assessment of the Ammonia Tank Assembly
(ATA) using the Design Coupled Loads Analysis (DCLA) #2 interface force
information and provide it to the Government in contractor format via
contract letter.

I&O b. Provide a thermal model of the Ammonia tank Assembly (ATA) to the
Government

I&O c. Using Government provided thermal data, perform a revised
structural assessment of the Ammonia Tank Assembly (ATA) to support
cargo item integration activities and provide it to the Government in
contractor format via contract letter.

**1.3.1.31 ITS S0 Rigid Avionics Assembly Structures to USL Fit Check**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Evaluate USL external configuration to determine if any of the
USL external outfitting must be represented during the ITS S0 to USL fit
check test.

I&O b. Prepare test plan and procedures for fit check test.

I&O c. Conduct Test Readiness Review prior to the test.

I&O d. Conduct fit check test.

I&O e. Provide fit check test report in contractor format within 60 days
after the test to the Government via contracts letter.

I&O f. Take DPA measurements of the USL with the ITS S0.

I&O g. Analyze the ITS S0 and USL DPA data to identify any obstructions
and interference of the on-orbit mating of the ITS S0 Rigid Avionics
Umbilical Assembly to the USL.

I&O h. Provide DPA Analysis Report in contractor format to the
Government via contracts letter 30 days after completion of analysis.

**1.3.1.32 On-Orbit Replaceable Unit (ORU) Removal Fixture for the
Integrated**

**Equipment Assembly (IEA)**

DDT&E The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and test factory
support equipment for the removal and replacement of the Pump Flow
Control System (PFCS), the IEA Batteries, the Battery Charge and
Discharge Unit (BCDU), the Direct Current Switching Unit (DCSU), and the
Direct Current-to-Direct Current Converter Unit (DDCU) ORUs from the
lower deck of the IEA without having to remove the IEA from the Cargo
Element Workstand (CEWS).

**1.3.1.33 Mobile Transporter Hardware and Software Integration**

I&O The contractor shall conduct the Mobile Transporter (MT) Hardware
and Software Integration (HSI) Development Test at Astro Aerospace in
Goleta , California. The test activities shall consist of:

I&O (1) setup of the MT on a test bed rail assembly at Astro Aerospace
facilities;

I&O (2) setup of Multiplexer/Demultiplexer (MDM) Application Test
Environment (MATE) Flight Equivalent Unit (FEU) MDM, connecting cables,
and software

I&O (3) provide test plan 30 days prior to start of test in contractor
format to the Government via contract letter,

I&O (4) conduct test readiness review at Astro Aerospace;

I&O (5) conduct HSI test using the following scenarios:

(a) Hardware Checkout -- Power on, initialize and power off each
    Integrated Motor Controller Assembly (IMCA). This will verify the
    IMCA Remote Terminal (RT) address and confirm that the device is
    controllable.

(b) Manual Modes -- Individually command each IMCA to perform the
    operations necessary to accomplish a nominal translation, worksite
    acquisition and latch-down

(c) Nominal Scenarios -- Command the MT through automatic sequences to
    perform nominal worksite acquisition and latch-down. This will
    involve crossing a simulated SAFJ gap on the test rail because the
    gap is located between the worksites.

(d) Off-nominal Scenarios -- Using a limited set of cases, demonstrate
    the MT's capability to handle abort commands, loss of communications
    and off-nominal events. This will also demonstrate that the correct
    Cautions, warnings, and Advisories (CWA) responses to the failure
    scenarios are generated.

I&O (6) provide MT HIS test report and test data in contractor format to
the Government via contracts letter within 60 days after test
completion.

**1.3.1.34 Crew Health Care Subsystem Checkout and Fit Check Testing**

I&O The Contractor shall support NASA conducted checkout and fit check
testing of the following Crew Health Care Subsystem (CHeCS) hardware.
Checkout and fit check testing of CHeCS hardware shall support existing
U.S. Laboratory schedules.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  U.S. Laboratory

  Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter

  Medical Equipment Computer

  Intra-Vehicular Charged Particle Directional Spectrometer

  Respiratory Support Pack

  Volatile Organic Analyzer

  Defibrillator
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

I&O Fit check testing shall consist of verifying mechanical and resource
interfaces. The Contractor shall provide anomaly investigation and
resolution for failures occurring during checkout of provided CHeCS
hardware items. Anomaly investigation shall be limited to isolating the
source of the failure. Resolution of failures isolated to the CHeCS
hardware item will be the responsibility of NASA. The Contractor shall
notify NASA within 8 hours of a failure of any CHeCS hardware item. The
Contractor shall provide notification of completion of the check out and
fit check testing to NASA via contract letter, in contractor format,
within 60 days.

**1.3.1.35 Crew Health Care Subsystem Volatile Organic Analyzer Mockup
Build and Integration**

DDT&E The Contractor shall design, fabricate, verify, and integrate into
the U.S. Laboratory module, Flight support Equipment (FSE) that
simulates the size and interfaces of the Crew Health Care Subsystem
(CHeCS) Volatile Organic Analyzer (VOA). The Contractor shall provide
notification of completion of the task to NASA via contract letter, in
contractor format, within 60 days.

**1.3.1.36** **Boeing Support for ISS Training**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a) For training objective meetings, identify the functions of the
Contractor-provided ISS subsystem that requires human action to
implement, provide the engineering data needed to develop training
objectives for the flight crews and the flight controller, derive, edit,
and refine the identified functions into training objectives, develop a
"Boeing Participation for ISS Training Summary Report", and deliver to
the Government, in contractor format, via contract letter.

I&O b) Provide training simulation sessions for on-orbit crew tasks, by
USL subsystem, using Government-provided Portable Computer System (PCS)
displays, procedures, and contractor-developed Matrix X USL models.
Completion of this task assumes receipt of Government furnished displays
and procedures no later than 4 weeks prior to the start of each session.

I&O c) Build an on-orbit crew training tool with PCS displays and
simulated telemetry signatures by providing captured Lab Sim simulation
sessions

I&O d) For the period of performance, develop and deliver a "Boeing
Participation for ISS Training Summary Report" detailing at a summary
level the training sessions and training tool development sessions, to
the Government, in contractor format, via contract letter.

I&O e) Review Part Task Trainer (PTT) lessons and models for validity,
and provide a "Boeing Participation for ISS Training Summary Report" to
the Government, in contractor format, via contract letter.

I&O f) Perform Testing and Operations Support for the Space Station
Training Facility (SSTF), and provide a summary report on anomaly
resolution including significant problem reports and configuration
management issues, to the Government, in contractor format, via contract
letter.

I&O g) Attend NASA Spaceflight Training Division IPT meetings, and
provide a "Boeing Participation of ISS Training Summary Report" to the
Government, in contractor format, via contracts letter.

I&O h) Attend NASA/JSC Operations Integration Control Board (OICB), and
provide a "Boeing Participation for ISS Training Summary Report" to the
Government, in contractor format, via contract letter.

I&O i) Attend NASA/JSC Expedition Crew Working Group (ECWG) meetings,
and provide a "Boeing Participation for ISS Training Summary Report" to
the Government, in contractor format, via contract letter within 45 days
of the end of the 2^nd^ quarter of CY 1999.

**1.3.1.37 The Medium Data Rate Communication Outage Recorder**

OPD The MCOR development is dependent upon the customer for delivery of
GFE and GFS. The specifics of the GFE and GFS will be controlled in a
Customer Expectation Agreement (CEA) as agreed to by the technical
parties. NASA will be procuring, assembling, acceptance testing, and
qualifying the MCOR flight units (COTS H/W). Boeing will develop and
qualify the flight s/w application, support the acceptance/qualification
functional testing, and perform the Ku-Band Hardware/Software
Integration Test using the supplied GFE MCOR H/W.

OPD For the Medium Data Rate Communication Outage Recorder (MCOR), the
Contractor shall:

OPD a. Develop, document, and provide the MCOR specification in
contractor format.

OPD b. Conduct one MCOR Critical Design Review.

OPD c. Design, develop, fabricate, test, and deliver MCOR that meets the
following requirements:

1.  Receives and transmits CCSDS packets in accordance with HRDL
    standards.

2.  Records data from two fiber optic inputs at an aggregate data rate
    of 10Mbps.

3.  Plays back data on one fiber optic output at an average data rate of
    10Mbps.

4.  Has a data storage medium capability equal to 75Gbits at
    end-of-life.

5.  Communicate Status, Command, and Control, via MIL-STD-1553 bus.

6.  Meets Criticality 3 workmanship levels for ISS environments, EMI,
    and EPS.

7.  Provides real-time temperature measurement.

8.  Meets the physical characteristics (not including connector
    extrusions) of 16.50" (L) x 15.50" (W) x 6.2" (H) and less than 75
    pounds.

9.  Meets the nominal operating voltage of 120 vDC.

10. Meets the maximum power consumption of not exceeding 120 watts.

OPD d. Design, develop, test and deliver to the government MCOR
non-flight prototype Engineering Development Unit (EDU) Kit,
installation and checkout instructions, and an Engineering Data package,
the testing to include developmental environment testing, EPS power
quality testing at the SPEL in Canoga Park, system integration testing,
workmanship, and verification testing in accordance with the contractor
developed MCOR Specification for ISS criticality level 3 equipment, to
support the MCOR development process.

OPD e. Perform an integrated thermal analysis of the MCOR and the AV-3
Rack.

OPD f. Design, develop, test, and deliver flight interface cable
harnesses and flight connectors which go to and from the COR scar in USL
Rack AV-3 and the MCOR.

OPD g. Design, develop, test, and certify the COR CCS R1 flight software
release.

OPD h. Integrate the MCOR (MCOR GFM hardware, firmware, and software)
ORU.

OPD i. Deliver an "MCOR EDU Test and Analysis Report" to the government
in contractor format, via contract letter, of the assembled MCOR EDU kit
from GFM components, within 90 days of completion of the environmental,
power supply, system integration, workmanship, certification, and
qualification testing, and of the integrated thermal analysis.

OPD j) Perform MCOR Hardware and Software Integration (HSI) testing with
the MCOR Flight ORUs to support Vehicle system test requirements within
the ISS System Integration Laboratory (ISIL) Facility.

OPD k) Deliver an "MCOR Hardware and Software Integration Test Report",
in contractor format, via contract letter, to the government, within 60
days of completion of the HSI test.

OPD l) Deliver MCOR installation and operation instructions, in
contractor format, to the government, via contract letter, within 60
days of delivery of the Flight MCOR ORU Kits.

OPD m) Modify the AV-3 Rack within the USL element to accommodate the
MCOR ORU.

OPD n) Perform installation fit checks and functional check of MCOR, and
ISS hardware.

OPD o) Provide support for the manifesting of the MCOR onto the launch
vehicle.

OPD p) Deliver the modified MCOR avionics rack face plate installed as
part of the Avionics Rack #3 launch assembly configuration.

OPD q). Per MCOR USL Prelaunch Installation Kit instructions and check
out procedures, install MCOR items into USL AV#3 rack after USL DD250
and prior to USL launch and secure the items for launch.

OPD r). Fabricate and deliver an On-orbit IVA MCOR Installation Kit.

**1.3.1.38 The High Data Rate Communication Outage Recorder**

OPD For the High Data Rate Communication Outage Recorder (HCOR) ~~kit~~,
the Contractor shall:

OPD a. Develop in accordance with VE-07, an HCOR Configuration Item
Development Specification (CIDS) document.

OPD b. Conduct an HCOR Preliminary Design Review and Critical Design
Review.

OPD c. Design, develop, fabricate, test, and deliver HCOR(s) that
meet(s) the following requirements:

OPD 1. Receives and transmits data in accordance with HRDL standards,
bursting to no less than 95Mbps.

OPD 2. Provides a bit error rate of no more than 10^-9^.

OPD 3. Packages received bit-stream data into CCSDS packets.

OPD 4. Passes-through and records data from eight fiber optic inputs at
an aggregate data rate of no less than 130Mbps.

OPD 5. Plays back data on two fiber optic outputs at an aggregate data
rate of no less than 130Mbps.

OPD 6. Has a data storage medium capability of 220Gbits at end-of-life.

OPD 7. Communicate Status, Command, and Control, via MIL-STD-1553 bus.

OPD 8. Meets Criticality 3 workmanship levels for ISS.

OPD 9. Meets MTBF of 35,000 hours and an operational lifetime of at
least 10 years.

OPD 10. Meets the physical characteristics (not including connector
extrusions) of 11.50" (L) x 16.50" (W) x 8.0" (H) and less than 75
pounds.

OPD 11. Meet the nominal operating voltage of 120 vDC.

OPD 12. Meets the maximum power consumption of not exceeding 145 watts.

OPD d. Perform installation fit checks of the HCOR and ISS hardware
using the highest fidelity hardware available.

OPD e. Perform integration testing of the HCOR EDU with the C&T Ku-band
system and the C&DH system at the ISIL, and perform Hardware and
Software Integration (HSI) testing, to support Vehicle system test
requirements.

OPD f. Deliver a "C&T Ku-band System, C&DH System, and HCOR EDU Hardware
and Software Integration Test Report", in contractor format, via
contract letter, to the government, within 90 days of completion of the
Vehicle system requirements tests.

OPD g. Perform integration testing of the HCOR Flight Proto-flight Units
(PFUs) with the C&T Ku-band system & C&DH system at the ISIL, and
perform Hardware and Software Integration (HSI) testing, to support
Vehicle system test requirements.

OPD h. Deliver a "C&T Ku-band System, C&DH System, and HCOR PFU Hardware
and Software Integration Test Report", in contractor format, via
contract letter, to the government, within 90 days of completion of the
Vehicle system requirements tests.

OPD i. Provide support for the manifesting of the HCOR onto the launch
vehicle by updating documents and updating designs, to meet MPLM
environmental requirements.

**1.3.1.39 Operational Procedures for the Improvement of Moderate
Temperature Loop**

**Capability for Payloads**

I&O The Contractor shall develop and deliver to the Government in
accordance with DR OP01, Operational Sequence Diagrams to stop Moderate
Temperature Loop (MTL) flow to the MSS Workstation in the USL when it is
unpowered and to reduce MTL flow to the Airlock to the minimum required
during Airlock housekeeping mode.

I&O The Contractor shall perform an analysis of the MTL flow rate to
support Airlock housekeeping mode and Airlock normal operations and the
effect on Node 1 RPCMs of reduced flow to the Airlock and provide the
results of the analysis to the government in contractor format via
contract letter within 60 days of completion of the analysis.

I&O The Contractor shall perform an analysis of MTL flow meter
capability above 3000 lbm/hr and estimate any software or hardware
changes required for this operation and provide the results in a report
to the government in contractor format via contracts letter within 60
days of completion of the analysis.

I&O The Contractor shall perform an analysis of ammonia/water heat
exchanger performance at flow rates above 3000 lbm/hr and provide the
analysis results in a report to the government in contractor format via
contracts letter within 60 days of completion of the analysis.

I&O The Contractor shall conduct a TRR for a USL ground test to
demonstrate required system pump performance at increased flow rate.

I&O The Contractor shall conduct a USL ground test to demonstrate
required system pump performance at increased flow rate.

I&O The Contractor shall provide a test report for the USL ground test
to demonstrate required system pump performance at increased flow rate
to the Government in contractor format via contracts letter within 60
days of completion of the test.

I&O The Contractor shall perform an analysis to ensure no impact to an
RPCM as a result of a stoppage of MT cooling water flow to the RPCM in
the pump package by turning off the existing MT flow control valve and
provide the results in a report to the government in contractor format
via contracts letter within 60 days of completion of the analysis.

I&O The Contractor shall develop operational procedures to reduce System
Flow Control Assembly flow rate in order to provide an additional 50
lbm/hr for payload use.

I&O The Contractor shall develop test plans and procedures to evaluate
the performance of a reduced System Flow Control Assembly (SFCA) flow
rate to provide an additional 50 lbm/hr for payload use.

**1.3.1.40 Provide ISS Power to the MPLM Prior to Node 2 Arrival**

**1.3.1.40.1 MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper**

OPD a. The Contractor shall build a MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper, that
connects between USL Aft Bulkhead Connector J13 and the Node 1 Forward
Bulkhead Connector J16.

OPD b. The MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper shall be similar to the existing
USL to Node 1 Channel 2/3 vestibule power jumper, except that its
connectors shall be wired to bring the Node 2 power feed pins Connector
P13, Circuit: N2-2A3B temp, Pins: A&B, to the MPLM power input pins
Connector: P16, Circuit: MPLM N1N, Pins E&F. Pins E&F in P13 of the new
jumper and Pins A&B of P16 of the new jumper do not have to be wired.

OPD c. The MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper shall be designed for installation
and removal on orbit via IVA operations.

OPD d. The MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper shall be labeled as to which side
connects to the USL and which side connects to Node 1.

OPD e. The Contractor shall perform a fit check of the MPLM
Cross-Connect Jumper on the USL at KSC and provide a test report to the
Government in contractor format within 60 days after test.

OPD f. The MPLM Cross-Connect Jumper shall be considered acceptable when
it is shown to contain the proper sized conductors for its intended
carrying capacity, it is properly labeled, and it passes a continuity
and high power test.

OPD g. The Contractor shall provide to the Government via contracts
letter the cable installation procedures in contractor format.

OPD h. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain the MPLM
Cross-Connect Jumper documentation in accordance with DR PC05.

**1.3.1.40.2 Power Analysis Study**

OPD The Contractor shall perform, document, and deliver to the
Government a power analysis study to determine if it is acceptable to
power the MPLM from the USL LAB Payload Bus LAC6-2A3B, (together or
individually) within 90 days after completion of the study.

**OPD 1.3.1.41 On-Orbit MDM Firmware Update**

The Contractor shall modify the ISS System, except for FGB, such that
after modification of the ISS system, the MDM firmware can be changed
without opening the MDM ORU or returning the MDM ORU to the surface of
the Earth.

**1.3.1.42 Mobile Transporter to Mobile Based Servicer Attachment Bolt
Interface**

> **Testing**

The Contractor shall perform the following tasks:

I&O a. Prepare a Mobile Transporter (MT to Mobile Based Servicer (MBS)
Nut/Bolt interface test plan and procedures in contractor format within
30 days prior to test.

I&O b. Conduct Test Readiness Review (TRR) at Astro Aerospace.

I&O c. Conduct MT to MBS Nut/Bolt interface test.

I&O d. Provide the following EVA hardware for Human Thermal Vacuum
Testing:

+----------------------------+--------------+---------+----------------+
| EVA Hardware               | Type         | Deliver | Return No      |
|                            |              | No      | Later Than     |
|                            |              | Later   |                |
|                            |              | Than    |                |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------+----------------+
| Qualification Captive Nut  | Q            | 6/4/99  | 30 days after  |
|                            | ualification |         | test           |
| (P/N D606941133-1)         |              |         | completion     |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------+----------------+
| MBS Interface Fixture      | Test Fixture | 6/4/99  | 30 days after  |
|                            |              |         | test           |
| P/N T60697347-1            |              |         | completion     |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------+----------------+
| MBS Bolt Assembly          | Q            | 6/4/99  | 30 days after  |
|                            | ualification |         | test           |
| (P/N 51800-2025)           |              |         | completion     |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------+----------------+
| Three, Test Bolts          | Flight       | 6/4/99  | 30 days after  |
|                            | Equivalent   |         | test           |
| (P/N 51800-2212            | Unit         |         | completion     |
+----------------------------+--------------+---------+----------------+

I&O e. Prepare test report in contractor format and submit to Government
within 60 days after the MT to MBS Nut/bolt interface test.

**1.3.1.43 Thruster Plume Contamination Math Models Development**

For the development of thruster plume math models for contamination
analysis, the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Survey, review, and assess available published and unpublished
literature and test data from plume-induced contamination experiments
from NASA, the United States Air Force (USAF), the ESA, the Russian
Space Agency (RSA), and the Arnold Engineering Development Center
(AEDC).

I&O b. Review, and assess U.S. and Russian flight experiment data to
include, if available, the flight experiment results from the upcoming
NASA Plume Impingement Contamination (PIC) experiment re-flight, and the
upcoming Russian Dvicon, Astra-III, and Kromka flight experiments.

I&O c. Review and assess experimental Russian chamber test data.

I&O d. Compile the data in a non-dimensional, contractor format.

I&O e. Assemble and develop curve fits for the non-dimensional data.

I&O f. Scale the data to the Russian Segment thrusters, the U.S.
Propulsion Module thrusters, the Space Shuttle Orbiter PRCS thrusters,
the ESA Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) thrusters, the Interim Control
Module (ICM) thrusters, and the NASDA Hope-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV)
thrusters.

I&O g. Using government-provided thruster data, develop thruster plume
math models for individual 10 and 13 Kgf thrusters of the Russian
Segment, individual reaction control system thrusters of the NASDA HTV,
individual reaction control system thrusters of the ESA Autonomous
Transfer Vehicle (ATV), individual thrusters of the U.S. Propulsion
Module, and individual PRCS thrusters of the Space Shuttle; which will
take into account:

1\) Quantification of liquid-phase droplet plume contamination
deposition;

2\) Plume induced contamination up to 90 degrees off the thruster plume
centerline;

3\) Thrust pulse width from 40 to 100 milliseconds;

4\) Thrust levels for up to 870 pounds-force.

I&O h. Provide Quarterly Progress Briefings, in contractor format via
contracts letter, summarizing Task findings, results, schedule status,
and future planning.

I&O i. Provide a Phase Two final briefing presentation, in contractor
format via contracts letter, no later than December 30, 2001.

I&O j. Provide a technical report about the Thruster Plume Contamination
Math Models, including the mathematical relationships which define the
characteristics of the specific individual thrusters, in contractor
format, no later than December 30, 2001.

**1.3.1.44 Node 3 Software**

OPD a. The Contractor shall define, develop and maintain software
requirements for Node 3 CSCIs (DR VE07). ). The contractor shall define
develop, code verify, and deliver the software for the Node 3 CSCIs.

I&O b. The Contractor shall define develop and maintain software
interface requirements for the Node 3 CSCIs (VE06).

**1.3.1.45 Logistics Carrier and Attached Payload Interface Analysis**

I&O The Contractor shall perform the following analyses to determine if
the as designed ITS S3 and ITS P3 attach sites can accommodate the
interface loads and the on-orbit operational requirements of the new
missions of Unpressurized Logistics Carrier (ULC) and Attached Payloads
(AP) which are different from the intended purpose for which those sites
were designed.

a.  Structural Analysis

b.  Mechanical Systems Analysis

c.  Thermal Analysis

    46. **Suit Performance Checkout Equipment Workmanship and Anomaly
        Resolution**

**Test**

I&O The Contractor shall develop, plan, and execute testing to determine
the cause of Power Supply Assembly anomalies in the Airlock.

47. **Enhancement of Ni-H2Battery Subassembly ORUs to Provide for
    Individual Cell Let down and External Cell voltage Monitoring**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide enhancement to battery ORUs (Ni-H2
Battery Subassemblies) by the addition of test connectors, associated
internal harnesses, and special test equipment to provide individual
battery cell let down for preferred storage condition.

48. **Support Node 2 and Node 3 Shell Temperature Sensors**

DDT&E The Contractor software shall interface with the Node 2, 300 ohm
Betathem temperature sensor to control Node 2 shell heaters when Node 2
is attached to Node 1 and USL. The Contractor software shall interface
with the Node 3, 300 ohm Betathem temperature sensor to control Node 3
shell heaters.

**1.3.1.49 Implementation of Preliminary Design and Analysis of the
EXPRESS Pallet Controller Assembly**

OPD a. The Contractor shall develop a preliminary design of the EXPRESS
Pallet Controller Assembly (ExPCA).

OPD b. The Contractor shall develop the following program plans
associated with the development of the ExPCA: Quality Assurance Plan; SW
Quality Assurance Plan; CM Plan; EMC Control Plan; Parts Control Plan;
ESD Control Plan; Maintainability Plan; Safety Plan; Reliability Plan;
HW Test Plan; Test Verification/Requirements Plan; SW Development Plan
(Flight); SW Development Plan(Testing); Corrosion Control Plan; M&P
Plan; Structural Control Plan; Manufacturing Plan; Radiator Development
Plan; Radiator Safety Plan; STE Test Plan and Methodology; SW STE Test
Plan and Methodology; and DPA Plans and Procedures.

50. **MT to MBS Capture Bar Relocation**

DDT&E The Contractor shall revise the grapple bar location so the Mobile
Transport (MT) and the Canadian Mobile Base System (MBS) meet the
preload requirements of 800 to 1850 lbs. (ref SSP 42003 Part 2 Figure
A3.2-8 and SSP 42003 Part 1 paragraph A3.2.2.f)

51. **Solar Array Blanket Box Label**

DDT&E The Contractor shall label the Blanket Restraint System (BRS) Pin
locations on each Solar Array Blanket Box (SABB) to provide visual cues
to facilitate EVA contingency operation.

52. **Digital Pre-Assembly Measurements of Lab Cradle Assembly**

I&O The Contractor shall perform digital Pre-Assembly (DPA) measurements
of critical interface features related to the Lab Cradle Assembly, to
include the MTSAS-Active, the LCA interface-to-USL, and the USL
interface-to-LCA.

53. **Direct Current Switching Unit (DCSU) Interface Flight Support
    Equipment (FSE)**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, and deliver Direct Current
Switching Unit (DCSU) Interface Flight Support Equipment (FSC) in
accordance with SSP 50492 and SSP 50493.

54. **PMA-1 H-Jumper Cables**

OPD a. The Contractor shall design, qualify, and deliver two PMA-1
H-Jumper cables to the Government. The PMA-1 H-Jumper cables will allow
for transfer of power to the Service Module ARCUs via the FGB ARCU Power
Feeds PMA-1A and PMA-1B.

> OPD b. The Contractor shall support the PMA-1 H-Jumper Cables for an
> NBL test at JSC.
>
> OPD c. The Contractor shall conduct a fit check of the PMA-1 H-jumper
> Cables on-site at Khrunichev.

55. **Flight Releasable Attachment Mechanism**

OPD a. The Contractor shall design and develop a flight Releasable
Attachment Mechanism (FRAM) in accordance with SSP 50491 and SSP 50492.

> OPD b. The Contractor shall fabricate, test, and deliver after
> completion of testing.

OPD c. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and deliver a
FRAM Ground Support Equipment (GSE) Ground Tooling in accordance with
SSP 50004 and SSP 50531.

> OPD d. The Contractor shall support NBL FRAM testing to determine EVA
> compatibility.

OPD e. The Contractor shall support FRAM Robotic System Evaluation
Laboratory (RSEL) testing to determine the FRAM robotics compatibility.

OPD f. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain at type 3,
FRAM-to-Cargo and FRAM-to-Cargo Carrier Platform Standard Interface
Control Document in accordance with DR VE06.

> OPD g. The Contractor shall provide a FRAM Design Data Book in
> accordance with DR VE-42.

56. **MDM On-Orbit Test Set**

OPD The Contractor shall develop an MDM on-orbit test set that
interfaces to the laptop computer and Utility Output Panel. This test
set shall provide the capabilities defined in SSP 50537.

57. **Gamah Seal Maintenance Kits and Leak-Check Kits**

OPD The Contractor shall deliver Maintenance Kits to support the
on-orbit maintenance of Gamah Seals.

58. **Solar Array Wing EVA Capability**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide the capability for Solar Array Wing
removal and replacement via EVA using the Space Station and Shuttle
Remote Manipulator System.

59. **Airlock SVS Target Accommodations**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide and verify accommodations for SVS
targets on the Airlock. The accommodations shall be in accordance with
SSP 50228, Volume 14, paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, and 3.5 and shall not
affect Airlock performance requirements.

60. **EVA Fasteners Data**

I&O The Contractor shall provide data for each EVA fastener and threaded
insert and nut to be used for assembly, and contingency operations on a
per flight basis.

**1.3.1.61 Development of Alternate Direct Current to Direct Current
Conversion Unit (DDCU)**

I&O The Contractor shall support NASA in their development of an
alternate DDCU.

**1.3.1.62 Crew Health Care System (CheCS) Performance**

I&O The Contractor shall provide Russian Service Module, USL, and
Habitation module interfaces for CheCS equipment sufficient to comply
with the requirements specified in the CheCS to Russian Segment, USOS,
and Habitation module interface documentation. The Contractor's
compliance with the interfaces specified and the Government provided
CheCS equipment shall constitute compliance with all crew health
requirements specified in SSP 41000 and SSP 41162.

63. **Support for the Development of the Fluid Line Repair Kit**

I&O The Contractor shall support NASA in the development of the Fluid
Line Repair Kit.

64. **Removal of the MPLM Input Power Grounding Loops**

OPD The Contractor shall modify the MPLM Vestibule Power Harness to
preclude an electrical path for MPLM input power return to ISS reference
structure.

65. **Color Coded Labels for the UIA**

DDT&E The Contractor shall apply Government provided color coded labels
to the Airlock side and to the Umbilical Interface Assembly (UIA) side
of each of the six fluid lines.

66. **EVA Fastener Data**

I&O The contractor shall provide data for each EVA fastener and threaded
insert and nut to be used for

assembly, and contingency operations.

67. **Hardware/Software Integration**

I&O The Contractor shall support the Government for flight software
operations at KSC including loading flight software, problem
troubleshooting and resolution, procedures review, and interfacing with
software developers.

68. **Digital Pre-Assembly Measurement and Analysis of
    Element-to-Element Interfaces**

I&O The Contractor shall perform Digital Pre-Assembly (DPA) measurements
and static fit analysis for ISS element mating interfaces.

69. **Software Flight Operations Information**

I&O The Contractor shall provide information about the operation and
behavior of the flight software, including math formula descriptions,
flow control diagrams, timing diagrams, mode dependencies, and software
sequence conditions (e.g., pass and fail criteria). This information
will be provided for each CSCI within the ISSA C&DH architecture.

70. **Cupola Pressure Pane Proof Testing**

OPD a. The Contractor shall perform an evaluation to determine if the
Cupola window pane stresses match the proof fixture pane stresses.

b.  The Contractor shall plan and conduct pressure testing of Cupola
    side pressure pane

    63. **Cupola Window Pane Markings**

OPD The Contractor shall provide markings on Cupola Window Panes to
identify location and orientation of specific panes within the cupola.

2.  **SUBSYSTEM PROVIDERS** (WBS 1.3.2)

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
a.  The Contractor shall:

DDT&E (1) Design, develop, manufacture, qualify, and provide subsystem
hardware and software components consistent with the overall
architecture required by paragraph 1.3.1.1 for each USOS subsystem.

DDT&E (2) Provide the necessary manufacturing planning, facilities,
equipment, hardware, and repair capability to ensure delivery of U.S.
flight hardware.

DDT&E (3) Design develop, produce, qualify, and provide Flight and GSE
software and firmware.

DDT&E (4) a) Design, analyze, assemble, and deliver as a residual asset,
the Mission Build Facility (MBF).

I&O b) Develop and implement an integrated Software Verification
Facility (SVF)/Mission Build Facility (MBF) transition plan (reference
paragraph 1.3.10) for the operational reconfiguration and maintenance of
ISS software. The Contractor shall allow the co-occupancy of the MBF by
the follow-on operations contractor during the transition period.

DDT&E (5) Integrate and build software for the U.S. On-Orbit Segment and
MBF in accordance with DOD-STD-2167 (as tailored by the Software
Development Plan) and the Software standards and Procedures
Specification.

DDT&E (6) Add a field in Standard Out for the Metric System Converter in
the MBF to use to convert the data to the Metric System. Maintain the
converter in the MBF, thereby providing a singular source of converters
for use both onboard by the PCS and on the ground by the Flight
Controllers.

I&O (7) The contractor shall provide a compilable source-code copy of
each Flight Software (FSW) release requested by SSTF, beginning at the
engineering release level, delivered under contract. The contractor
shall provide the support necessary to integrate the FSW into the SSTF,
and this support shall be provided by appropriate system and design
engineers experienced with the specific FSW being delivered to the SSTF.

I&O Successful integration of this software into the SSTF involves the
installation, testing and implementation of these deliverables by SSTF
personnel. Tasks for which contractor support is required, therefore,
include:

> 1\) preparation and installation of facility unique patches. (example
>
> PPLs)
>
> 2\) FSW Integration and Integrated Load Checkout sessions.\
> 3) FSW problem analysis for US FSW.\
> 4) definition and generation of problem fixes and work-arounds.\
> 5) problem tracking and documentation.\
> 6) input and interface with developer's FSW problem reporting system.\
> 7) FSW to Functional Equivalent Unit (FEU) MDM Interface
>
> development.\
> 8) problem analysis of USOS interfaces to International Partner FSW.

I&O (8) The contractor shall procure equipment and services called for
in the NASA Information Technology Plan for the Sonny Carter Training
Facility as identified by Attachment J-22.

DDT&E b. Subsystems addressed in paragraphs 1.3.2.a(1) through (5) above
include the following:

**1.3.2.1 Electrical Power (EP)** (WBS 1.3.2.1)

DDT&E The contractor shall provide means of minimizing the risk of
problems in ISS EPCE due to Common Mode Noise present in the
distribution of electric power. This risk of power-borne common mode
noise will be acceptably low for each respective EPCE if it meets the
following:

DDT&E a. provides isolation to common mode noise through the input power
terminals as determined by a documented drawing review, or

DDT&E b. provides required performance when tested as part of a fully
integrated major assembly, such as an equipment rack, or

DDT&E c. meets an appropriate input power Common Mode Noise
susceptibility test requirement, or

DDT&E d. can be determined to be non-susceptible to it's input power
environment under normal operating conditions.

DDT&E The contractor shall define and perform Common Mode susceptibility
measurements on up to twelve (12) existing EPCE that have been assessed
to have a medium to high risk of sensitivity to common mode noise. The
contractor shall define test requirements and take common mode
susceptibility measurements for up to six (6) GFE and/or International
Partner ORUs that have been identified by NASA to have medium to high
risk of sensitivity to Common Mode Noise. Where possible, these tests
will be conducted in conjunction with the EPCE Characterization Tests
required by ECP-102. The installation environment of a given item of
EPCE will be assessed to determine if the EPCE is likely to be affected
when the tests disclose that it has significant common mode
susceptibility.

DDT&E The risk of Susceptibility to Common Mode Noise (CMN) will be
assessed to be Medium, or High based on the following. The risk will be
said to be Medium if the probability of CMN susceptibility is assessed
to be 30% or less based on expert knowledge of its design. The risk will
be said to be High if the probability of CMN susceptibility is assessed
to be 31% or greater based on expert knowledge of its design. In
addition safety critical EPCE such as MDMs will be assessed to be High
Risk if they do not provide Common Mode Isolation at the electrical
power input. These criteria may be changed by mutual agreement between
NASA and Boeing Prime cognizant focals.

DDT&E For new EPCE designs, Common Mode Noise requirements are to be
developed for incorporation into SSP-52051 User Power Quality
Specification.

DDT&E Prime Peculiar Test Equipment Budget:

"Purchase articles of test equipment needed to conduct Common Mode
Tests."

DDT&E **1.3.2.2 Thermal Control (TC)** (WBS 1.3.2.2)

DDT&E **1.3.2.3 Guidance, Navigation and Control (GN&C)** (WBS 1.3.2.3)

**1.3.2.3.1** **GN&C Pre-Positioned Loads (PPLs)**

I&O The Contractor shall provide GN&C PPLs for on-board software to
support vehicle performance

requirements for each assembly stage configuration. Effort includes
analysis of flight timelines and operational scenarios, development and
verification of flight specific PPL parameters, and delivery of these to
the MBF.

DDT&E **1.3.2.4 Propulsion (P)** (WBS 1.3.2.4)

DDT&E **1.3.2.5 Command and Data Handling (C&DH)** (WBS 1.3.2.5)

DDT&E **1.3.2.6 Communications and Tracking (C&T)** (WBS 1.3.2.6)

1.  **Implement Triple Data Encryption Standard**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, test and deliver modified
Assembly/Contingency Baseband Signal Processor (ACBSP) on-orbit
replaceable units (ORUs) in accordance with the Triple Data Encryption
Standards (3DES) defined by the American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) X9.52.

The Contractor shall modify the ACBSP and transponder to add low rate
voice capability.

DDT&E **1.3.2.7 Life Support (LS)** (WBS 1.3.2.7)

DDT&E **1.3.2.8 Flight Crew Support (FCS)** (WBS 1.3.2.8)

DDT&E **1.3.2.9 Reserved**

DDT&E **1.3.2.10 Extravehicular Activity (EVA)** (WBS 1.3.2.10)

DDT&E a) The Contractor shall revise appropriate top level installation
drawings to reference the Government provided drawing number, within 120
days after the Government furnishes the drawing number.

DDT&E b) The Contractor shall deliver appropriate top level installation
drawings in CAD format to the Government no later than launch date minus
12 months.

DDT&E **1.3.2.11 Structures/Mechanisms (SM)** (WBS 1.3.2.11)

DDT&E **1.3.2.12 Extravehicular Robotics (EVR)** (WBS 1.3.2.12)

OPD **1.3.2.13 Centerline Berthing Camera System (CBCS**)

OPD a. The Contractor shall provide technical expertise to the fit check
and the integrated testing of the components that support the CBCS

OPD b. The Contractor shall modify integrated Truss Segment (ITS) S3,
ITS P3, and MSS MBS Common Attach System (MCAS) to accommodate External
Berthing Camera System (EBCS) target assembly 8584355-501.

OPD c. The Contractor shall install EBCS target assembly accommodation
hardware at KSC for the MCAS, ITS P3, and ITS S3.

OPD d. The Contractor shall install and checkout the EBCS targets on the
ITS S3, ITS P3, MCAS, Active Common Attach System (ACAS) Simulator, in
accordance with Government provided directions.

OPD e. The Contractor shall deliver and install at KSC a CBCS hatch
target and CBCS camera mounts on the Node 2 element.

**1.3.3 LAUNCH PACKAGE/STAGE (LP/S) INTEGRATION**

(WBS 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.3.10, 1.3.11, 1.3.12)

I&O For the ISS Vehicle, as defined by SSP 41000, using best available
data, the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Develop and maintain integrated plans and schedules for each
Launch Package/Stage that identify major activities associated with
design, development, verification, production, launch processing,
on-orbit assembly and integration with preceding and succeeding stages.
Monitor performance to these plans/schedules, and identify and
coordinate resolution of problems and issues with the associated and
affected program teams.

I&O b. Define for contract end-item elements, mission-specific
schedules, integrate mission-specific data (to satisfy Space Shuttle
data requirements), provide mission-to-mission process consistency, and
study and implement improvements to the integration process.

I&O c. Implement Launch Package/Stage integration and management.

I&O d. Perform the Launch Package/Stage tasks set forth in paragraphs
1.3.4 and 1.3.5 below.

I&O e. Provide support to NASA tasks installing and surveying vision
system targets in accordance with SSP 50262 NASA Theodolite Reference
Requirements for SVS Ground Surveys.

I&O f. Provide flight mission and post mission technical support for
launch package and manifest items.

I&O g. The Contractor shall provide for pre-flight fit-up of the MT
rails for the Outboard Truss Cargo Elements to reduce the risk to
on-orbit EVA assembly.

**1.3.3.1 Launch Package/Space Shuttle Integration** (WBS 1.3.3.1)

I&O The Contractor shall support the KSC APCU, CITE and Space Shuttle
Orbiter Interface Verification Testing (IVT) activities for the ISS.
This support shall consist of the following:

I&O a. Integrate NASA-JSC/KSC, Contractor Test Plan inputs, develop the
test plan, and coordinate NASA-JSC/KSC review and concurrence of the
finalized plan.

I&O b. Develop and deliver detailed test requirements with PG-1
support(OP03).

I&O c. Support development of IVT test procedures by KSC LP**r** IPT.

I&O d. Support conduct of IVT by KSC LP**r** IPT.

I&O e. Support development of IVT test reports by APCU subteam, KSC.

**1.3.4 RUSSIAN LAUNCH PACKAGE(including FGB)/STAGE INTEGRATION**

(WBS 1.3.4)

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Perform analysis and integration in accordance with paragraph
1.3.5.1.b.

I&O b. Conduct reviews of technical documentation provided by Russia in
accordance with the NASA/RSA contract and MOU requirements and
coordinate assessment of change impact.

I&O c. Plan, prepare, and conduct technical interchanges and reviews
associated with each Launch Package/Stage.

I&O d. Develop inputs for Russian bilateral documentation. (These
include such items as the Joint Management Plan, Hardware/Software
Exchange Agreement, and Data Exchange Agreement.)

I&O e. Provide flight readiness assessments in accordance with SSP 50108
based on Russian segment verification and certification.

I&O f. Provide technical coordination for Russian Supplied Elements via
in-country liaison office to facilitate resolution of problems and
issues, exchange of data and assessment of changes.

I&O g. Russian Launch Package/Stage Integration - Perform and support
early C&DH integration for the FGB and service module with the ISS C&DH
subsystem. These subsystem tests are performed in the U.S. and Russia.
These tests represent the Development and Prestage integration tests
referred to in the RSA BIVP draft (SSP 50101).

I&O h. The Contractor shall provide technical expertise to the Joint
Cargo Certification Team (JCCT) for certification of US hardware flown
aboard the Russian Segment and Russian Hardware flown aboard the USOS.
The Contractor shall assess hardware compatibility with induced
environments and functional interfaces.

I&O **1.3.5 NON-RUSSIAN LAUNCH PACKAGE/STAGE INTEGRATION**

(WBS 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.3.10, 1.3.11, 1.3.12)

**1.3.5.1 Launch Package/Stage Analysis and Integration** (WBS 1.3.5.1)

I&O a. For Space Shuttle flights containing at least one contract
end-item assembly element, the Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Provide data required and perform launch package integration of
U.S. elements per the launch package/stage integration plan.

I&O (2) Provide instruction to integrate each element of the Launch
Package with the orbiting configuration; and to checkout the preceding
and succeeding stages.

I&O (3) Develop and provide analyses and data required for the ISS
operational physical configuration documentation (e.g., Space Station
Configuration Control Drawing \-- SSCCD) for each Launch Package
element.

I&O (4) Perform and document Launch Package/Stage safety, hazard, and
logic-tree analyses (DR SM02).

I&O (5) Provide a signed statement of flight readiness for each flight
as part of the CoFR process in accordance with SSP 50108.

I&O b. For ISS DIL and international elements launched on any launch
vehicle, the Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Define, document, and implement the analytical process to
integrate each launch package element with the orbiting configuration;
and to checkout the element with preceding and succeeding stages.

I&O (2) Perform and document stage safety, hazard, and logic-tree
analyses (DR SM02).

I&O (3) Provide an assessment of flight readiness as part of the CoFR
process in accordance with SSP 50108.

I&O c. **Reserved**

I&O d. **Reserved**

**1.3.5.2 Launch Package/Stage Elements and Support Equipment**

The Contractor shall:

DDT&E a. Analyze, design, develop, fabricate, assemble, integrate,
verify, and deliver the U.S. funded contractor launch package flight
elements listed in Section J-5, Deliverable Items List (DIL), or in the
case of software product deliveries in excess of the DIL requirements,
specifically the delivery of (1) pre-FCA/PCA engineering and interim
fidelity software, (2) post FCA/PCA application software releases, (3)
software patches, (4) Pre-Positioned Loads, shall be delivered as
deliverable data in accordance with Section J-4 Data Requirements List,
DR SW01. This effort includes test articles, simulators, and other
equipment required to verify fit and functionality of the elements.

I&O b. Develop and verify U.S.-provided Launch Package Orbital Support
Equipment (OSE) and Flight Support Equipment (FSE) required to implement
the appropriate Development Specification (DR VE07).

DDT&E c. Develop, produce, and provide element-unique Ground Support
Equipment (GSE) and Test Support Equipment (TSE), including software
developed in accordance with the Software Development Plan for both, as
required to manufacture, assemble, test, integrate, and deliver the
elements.

I&O d. As part of the Z1 and PMA-3 launch package integration at KSC,
(1) physically mate the MBM-1 to PMA-3, (2) fit check the MBM's with the
FE1410 Passive CBM Ring Simulator, and (3) once the MBM is installed on
Z1, fit check the MBM with the FE1410 passive CBM Ring Simulator.

OPD e. Provide a full battery complement installed on the P4, SA and S6
elements for launch. Provide a Photovoltaic radiator on the S6 element
for launch.

OPD f. The Contractor shall design, develop, verify and deliver flight
support equipment (FSE) in accordance with SSP 50492 and ISS-0444001.

OPD g. The Contractor shall design, procure, and deliver Orbital Support
Equipment (OSE) (thermal blankets), in accordance with SSP 50492, to
provide thermal protection during launch to activation. The complete
list of deliverables is detailed in Section J, Attachment J-5,
Deliverable Items List (DIL). Additionally, the Contractor shall perform
follow-up analysis to support final definition of nominal EVA timeline
and MOD activities, to include thermal analysis.

OPD h. Enhanced Universal Trunnion Attachment System

> 1\) The Contractor shall deliver Enhanced Universal Trunnion
> Attachment System (EUTAS) Passive Subassemblies Orbital Support
> Equipment (OSE) in accordance with SSP 50492.
>
> 2\) The Contractor shall install the EUTAS Passive Subassemblies
> Orbital Support Equipment (OSE) in the S1, P1, P3, P5, S3, and S5
> truss elements.
>
> 3\) The Contractor shall deliver (DD1149) a EUTAS-P Installation Tool.
> Also, the Contractor shall develop Go/No Go Gauges for EUTAS to
> EUTAS-P fit check verification.

OPD i. The Contractor shall deliver ORU Flight Support Equipment (FSE)
which attaches the MBSU ORU to the launch carrier, protects the ORU
during launch, on orbit, and return, and is in accordance with SSP
50492. The Contractor shall design ORU Flight Support Equipment (FSE)
for:

[ORU Part Number]{.underline} [Description]{.underline}

1F28801 Ammonia Tank Assembly

1F96000 Nitrogen Tank Assembly

**1.3.6 FACTORY EQUIPMENT (FE)**

DDT&E In support of vehicle development the Contractor will ensure that
sufficient FE will be provided to support design, development, and
delivery of contract end-item Space Station hardware and

C-C-software. Specific FE covered under this paragraph are depicted
below, along with the responsible team member and the authorizing
change:

a\. Xenon Fill Cart (PG-2 development - SSCN 000209)

7.  **-- 1.3.9 Reserved**

**1.3.10 SOFTWARE VERIFICATION FACILITY (SVF)** (WBS 1.3.10)

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall develop, integrate, and document, a
Software Verification Facility (SVF), including hardware and software,
in accordance with the Software Development Plan.

I&O b. The contractor shall operate a Software Verification Facility
(SVF), including hardware and software in accordance with the Software
Development Plan to integrate and verify the ISS Vehicle, as defined by
SSP 41000, Flight software, Flight data loads, and International
Partner/Participant interfaces.

The SVF shall provide a capability to troubleshoot on-orbit anomalies.
The SVF shall provide for continued development and test activities
while conducting troubleshooting of on-orbit anomalies. The Contractor
shall develop and implement an Integrated SVF/MBF Transition Plan
(reference preceding paragraph 1.3.2). The Contractor shall allow the
co-occupancy of the SVF by the follow-on operations contractor during
the transition period. The SVF shall be delivered as a residual asset.

**1.3.11 PHASE 1 RISK MITIGATION/TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION** (WBS1.3.11)

DDT&E The following tasks shall be performed as part of the appropriate
IPT/AIT responsibility:

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall review risk mitigation/technology
demonstration proposals.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall identify the inherent risks and propose
flight demonstrations to reduce risks for ISS Phases 2 and 3.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall design, fabricate and deliver specific.
hardware specified in the Deliverable Items List (DIL) PC15-1; provide
for the specific hardware, required documentation as specified in
Attachment J-4. - Data Requirements Document (DRD); and provide for the
specific hardware, supporting data, and PG 1 and PG3 shall provide
engineering support to the following NASA documents/review:

DDT&E 1) Critical Design Review (CDR) Data Package and Review Support

DDT&E 2) Certification and Acceptance Requirements Documents

DDT&E 3) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis/Critical Items List

DDT&E 4) Hazard Report

DDT&E 5) Launch Site Installation Drawings (MECSLSl) VO72-20000X)

DDT&E 6) Interface Control Documents

DDT&E 7) Interface Requirements Documents

DDT&E 8) Life-Limited Items List

DDT&E 9) Material Usage Agreement

DDT&E 10) Math Models/Reports

DDT&E 11) Non-metallic Material List

DDT&E 12) Operations procedures (Annex 2 and 3)

DDT&E 13) Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Data Package and Review
Support

DDT&E 14) Pre-Delivery Acceptance Procedures (PDA)

DDT&E 15) Pre-Installation Acceptance Procedures (PIA)

DDT&E 16) Safety Analysis Report

DDT&E 17) Specific Design Requirements Documents

DDT&E 18) Structural Verification Plan

DDT&E 19) Test Readiness Review Packages and plans as required

DDT&E 20) Discrepancy Report Resolution (as required)

DDT&E Submit the following Attachment J-4 Data Requirements:

DDT&E 1) Acceptance Data Package (PC08),

DDT&E 2) Configuration Control (Change Requests),

DDT&E 3) Flight Drawings (released, as-built) (PC05), and

DDT&E 4) Materials Identification Usage Lists (MIUL) (VE09).

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall assess the results of Phase 1 flight
experiment data and provide appropriate recommendations for implementing
these results into Phases 2 and 3 of the ISS Program.

**1.3.12 FGB PROCUREMENT AND INTEGRATION** (WBS 1.3.12)

DDT&E *(Due to the special nature of the FGB, many requirements have
been called out more specifically than for other elements To the extent
that requirements in this section overlap with more general requirements
in other sections of this SOW, separate teams or processes are not to be
employed; rather, these FGB requirements are to be executed as part of
an overall integrated process.)*

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall contract with Khrunichev (KhSC) to design,
build, and deliver the FGB. The Contractor shall integrate the FGB with
other ISS elements. This effort includes the test articles, simulators,
and other equipment required to verify FGB fit and functionality. The
effort also includes trainers and FGB-unique support equipment,
including software for both as required to manufacture, assemble, test,
deliver, operate, and maintain the FGB.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall ensure the KhSC design meets the ISS
performance requirements (DR MG02) and delivery schedule, and that
Khrunichev support for ground and orbital operations is provided through
successful activation and on-orbit checkout; and that KhSC support for
ground and orbital operations is provided for Service Module docking and
fuel transfer demonstration).

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall accomplish the tasks of this Statement of
Work through membership and participation on the Vehicle IPTs and AITs.
The Contractor shall use existing ISS Program resources, and shall
perform all tasks consistent with the Bilateral Agreements between NASA
and RSA. The Contractor shall provide support in the KhSC Plant as
required to meet the requirements herein. These efforts shall be
conducted in conjunction with the NASA Moscow Liaison Office.

**1.3.12.1 Requirements and Capabilities Definition**

DDT&E The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain a FGB
specification (DR VE07) to include applicable functions and performance
of the Russian Segment Specification and functions of the Russian Space
Agency requirements on the FGB.

**1.3.12.2 Integration Support**

DDT&E The Contractor shall assess design compliance of the Russian
segment with the FGB specifications and ICD requirements, support
verification and certification, develop and maintain FGB-unique plans
and schedules (DR FGB01), and provide flight readiness assessment in
accordance with SSP 50108.

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide software development tools, technical
support, documentation and training to facilitate the use of US provided
Space Station MDM\'s in the FGB.

**1.3.12.3 Test and Verification**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall review FGB verification plans for
compliance to the Russian Segment Specification and ISS Program test and
verification requirements.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall perform an analysis by process sampling to
determine whether KhSC verification philosophies, roles, and
responsibilities for assembly, integration and verification of the FGB
satisfy by similarity the ISS Program test and verification process
identified in the Program Master Integration and Verification Plan (DR
MG05). The Contractor shall provide this analysis with any recommend
modifications to NASA (DR FGB02). In addition, the Contractor shall
implement the FGB agreements as specified in the Bilateral Integration
and Verification Plan (BIVP) with RSA.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall perform a breadboard CID test in the SPEL
facility to determine the effects of the CID on system performance. The
flights 5A and 6A primary power configurations will be used for this
test.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall provide a breadboard CID test report to
the Government in Contractor format within 30 days after completion of
the test.

DDT&E e. The Contractor shall perform a USL/CID structural analysis on
the USL to quantify the loading effects of the CID adapter as described
in the data provided by the Government.

DDT&E f. The Contractor shall provide USL/CID structural analysis report
to the Government in Contractor format within 30 days after completion
of the analysis.

**1.3.12.4 Launch Site Support**

DDT&E The Contractor, via KhSC[,]{.underline} shall transport the FGB to
the launch site, conduct prelaunch preparation, and provide launch
support. The Contractor shall document and provide to NASA any KhSC
support requirements (DR FGB03) at the RSA launch site, including launch
site processing and test operations and support.

**1.3.12.5 Flight Operations**

DDT&E The Contractor, via KhSC, shall document the development of
Russian procedures and processes to support on-orbit activation and
checkout operations of the FGB, including command and control, procedure
development, mission planning, reconfiguration products, and operations
training.

DDT&E The Contractor shall assist NASA in the procurement of hardware
and software for ground facilities required by KhSC to control the FGB.

**1.3.12.6 Training**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide training via KhSC to crew and ground
controllers required for FGB operations. The contractor shall provide
requirements documentation necessary for FGB crew/controller training to
be conducted by RSA.

**1.3.12.7 Maintenance and Spares**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide the necessary spares and contingency
implementation plans for the FGB hardware (NAS15-10110, DR OPR-001). The
Contractor shall via KhSC develop FGB maintenance concepts and
procedures, and manage the Contractor-developed hardware spares and
repair program (DR FGB05). The Contractor shall provide initial spares
procurement to support the FGB through launch. The Contractor via KhSC
shall provide 2 battery current converters and 1 current converter
control unit to be delivered on flight 3A and stowed as spares.

**1.3.12.8 Tier 1 Study Plan**

DDT&E The Contractor shall produce a study plan (DR FGB06) that reviews
and implements contract requirements for a second FGB. The study plan
shall include an engineering development schedule required to implement
the modifications should the option to procure a second FGB be
exercised.

**1.3.12.9 FGB Safety and Mission Assurance**

DDT&E The contractor shall ensure that KhSC data procured under the KhSC
subcontract (described in SDRL\'s QA-07, RE-01, RE-02, RE-03, SA-01,
SA-02, SA-03, and MA-02 to the KhSC subcontract) is compliant with data
descriptions and is distributed to the appropriate NASA and Energia team
members. The contractor shall also perform selected process sampling of
critical processes for purposes of assessing KhSC compliance to the FGB
specification quality assurance requirements.

**1.3.12.10 FGB Operational Support**

I&O The contractor shall provide, via KhSC, the capability to support
technical trade studies, joint tests, and hardware/software design
enhancements.

I&O **1.3.13 CENTRIFUGE ACCOMMODATION MODULE (CAM)** (WBS 1.3.13)

**1.3.13.1 Develop Centrifuge Accommodation Module Prime Item
Development Specification (PIDS)**

I&O The contractor shall support NASA\'s development of the Centrifuge
Accommodation Module Prime Item Development Specification (PIDS). The
contractor\'s effort shall be comprised generally of performing reviews
for consistency with total vehicle requirements, developing \"from/to\"
language to the ISS System and Segment Specifications, and assisting
NASA in analyzing the CAM End Item Specification. The contractor shall
advise NASA as necessary regarding the contractor\'s analysis whenever
the contractor believes the analysis indicates an inconsistency between
the CAM PIDS as developed and the rest of the ISS Architectural and End
-Item Specifications. Additionally, the contractor shall specifically:

I&O 1. Draft \"from/to\" language from the System and Segment
Specifications for the ISS.

I&O 2. Perform functional requirements decomposition review at the
System, Segment level to the End Item Specification level for the CAM
PIDS.

I&O 3. Review, analyze and provide comments to NASA on the annotated
outline of the CAM PIDS. This analysis shall focus on proper scope of
the PIDS necessary for functionality and producability.

I&O 4. Participate with NASA Technical Managers in analyzing the PIDS to
meet Space Station interfaces and provide background information on
Space Station Systems through informal discussions.

I&O 5. In each of the above reviews, the ISS Architecture Teams shall
participate and provide analysis to ensure consistency between the CAM
PIDS and the ISS subsystem architecture.

**1.3.14 GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, & CONTROL INTEGRATION TEST FACILITY
(GITF)**

**1.3.14.1 GN&C Integration Test (GIT) Integrated Product Team (IPT)
Support**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support of the GN&C Integration‑Test
Facility by participating as a member of the GN&C Integration Test (GIT)
Integrated Product Team (IPT).

The Contractor support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Participating in all scheduled IPT meetings as a representative
of the Prime GN&C team.

I&O 2) Providing input to decisions regarding GITF test schedules and
test priorities

I&O 3) Supporting IPT program reviews

I&O 4) Supporting IPT trade studies

I&O 5) Providing status to the IPT concerning Prime GN&C verification
objectives and plans.

I&O 6) Providing feedback on GITF development plans and its associated
facility test plans.

I&O 7) Providing GITF status to Prime management.

I&O 8) Helping resolve scheduling or priority conflicts with PG 1 and
other Prime test activities.

I&O The IPT Support Period shall be for 22 months at JSC in Houston.

**1.3.14.2 Test Plans and Procedures Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support development of test plans and
procedures to perform functional/integration testing in the GN&C
Integration Test Facility (GITF).

I&O The Contractor C&DH/C&C and GN&C support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Reviewing and providing comments on GITF prepared test plans.

I&O 2) Providing their own existing test scripts and procedures where
appropriate.

I&O 3) Providing expertise pertaining to ISS GN&C and C&C testing
objectives.

I&O The support schedule shall be for 7 test periods at JSC in Houston
and MDA in Huntington Beach.

**1.3.14.3 US GN&C to US C&C Testing Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support the US GN&C to US C&C testing in the
GN&C Integration Test Facility (GITF).

I&O The Contractor C&C support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Witnessing the US GN&C to US C&C testing.

I&O 2) Installing the C&C flight software on the MDM FEU.

I&O 3) Installing any supporting simulations on the MATE.

I&O 4) Validating the C&C software is configured for testing.

I&O 5) Providing C&C S/W expertise.

I&O 6) Modifying C&C sim software as necessary.

I&O 7) Supporting the resolution of anomalies that may occur during
testing.

I&O 8) Supporting comparisons of initial test results with existing test
or analysis data.

I&O 9) Providing follow through to ensure that the developers resolve
anomalies discovered during the testing.

I&O The Contractor GN&C support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Witnessing the US GN&C to US C&C testing.

I&O 2) Providing test signature data from analysis results.

I&O 3) Supporting configuration setup and validation.

I&O 4) Supporting the resolution of anomalies that may occur during
testing.

I&O 5) Supporting comparisons of initial test results with existing test
or analysis data.

I&O 6) Providing follow through to ensure that the developers resolve
anomalies discovered during the testing.

I&O 7) Providing RS GN&C Flight software and system performance
expertise.

I&O The US GN&C/C&C Test Period shall be for 3 weeks at JSC in Houston.

I&O The US/RS GN&C Test Period shall be for 4 weeks at JSC in Houston.

**1.3.14.4 US GN&C Testing of the FQT GN&C Flight Software Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support the integrated US GN&C testing of the
PG I FQT GN&C Flight Software in the GN&C Integration Test Facility
(GITF).

I&O The Contractor GN&C support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Witnessing the integrated US GN&C testing of the FQT software
with the GN&C sensor and effectors.

I&O 2) Providing test signature data from analysis results.

I&O 3) Supporting test configuration setup and validation.

I&O 4) Supporting the resolution of anomalies that may occur during
testing.

I&O 5) Supporting comparisons of initial test results with existing test
or analysis data.

I&O 6) Providing follow through to ensure that the developers resolve
anomalies discovered during the testing.

I&O The US GN&C Test Period shall be for 3 weeks at JSC in Houston.

**1.3.14.5 Pre-SVF GN&C Hardware and C&C GN&C Flight Software**

I&O The Contractor shall support the US/RS GN&C and C&C testing with the
enhanced Russian Models in the GN&C Integration Test Facility (GITF).

I&O The Contractor C&C support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Witnessing the Pre-SVF GN&C testing.

I&O 2) Installing the C&C flight software on the MDM FEU.

I&O 3) Installing any supporting simulations on the MATE.

I&O 4) Validating the C&C software is configured for testing.

I&O 5) Modifying C&C sim as necessary.

I&O 6) Supporting the resolution of anomalies that may occur during
testing.

I&O 7) Supporting comparisons of initial test results with existing test
or analysis data.

I&O 8) Providing follow through to ensure that the developers resolve
anomalies discovered during the testing.

I&O 9) Providing US flight software and system performance expertise.

I&O The Contractor GN&C support shall be in the form of:

I&O 1) Witnessing the Pre-SVF GN&C.

I&O 2) Providing test signature data from analysis results.

I&O 3) Supporting test configuration setup and validation.

I&O 4) Supporting the resolution of anomalies that may occur during
testing.

I&O 5) Supporting comparisons of initial test results with existing test
or analysis data.

I&O 6) Providing follow through to ensure that the developers resolve
anomalies discovered during the testing.

I&O 7) Providing RS GN&C flight software and system performance
expertise.

I&O The Pre-SVF GN&C Test Period shall be for 4 weeks at JSC in Houston.

15. **ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT/STAGE ACCEPTANCE TESTING**

**SUPPORT**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support of Integration Testing for the
following development and acceptance tests:

I&O 1) P6/Z1/N2/PMA/FGB Development Testing

I&O 2) Orbiter/APCU Development Testing

I&O 3) ODS BB/APA Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 4) N1/PMA Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 5) P6/Z1 Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 6) Lab Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 7) S0/S1 Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 8) JEM PM/ELM-P5/EF Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 9) APM Stage Acceptance Testing

I&O 10) Joint U.S./Russia Testing

I&O The above testing shall be conducted using the highest fidelity
interfacing elements or components available within the schedule
constraints of the Elements under test to meet launch dates.

**1.3.16 Reserved**

**1.3.17 GLASS CHARACTERIZATION TESTING**

I&O The Contractor shall support NASA characterization of chemically
termpered glass properties as follows:

I&O a. Procure glass test coupons from Corning for the purpose of
conducting Critical Stress intensity Factor, In-situ Crack Size
Measurement, Slow Crack Growth and Dynamic Fatigue testing of Corning
glass related to Type 0313 chemically tempered glass. The material
characterization testing will be performed by the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) through NASA's pre-existing interagency
agreement.

I&O b. Provide the procured glass test coupons to NIST.

I&O c. Perform analysis to determine Boeing Space Station hatch window
glass fracture characteristics by using the resultant material
properties from the NIST testing.

I&O d. Provide, upon request, electronic and hard copy versions of the
analysis in contractor format, within 60 days after receipt of data from
NIST.

**1.3.18 SPACE INTEGRATED GPS/INS TESTING**

I&O a) The Contractor shall support NASA's SIGI testing as follows:

I&O (1) Review NASA's test results from the transparency test going from
a Loral GPS R/P to a Honeywell SIGI by comparing the NASA test results
to SSP requirements and Interface Control Documents.

I&O (2) Review NASA's performance evaluation of SIGI based on an
evaluation utilizing Design Verification Test Unit (DVTU) with both
field testing and Guidance Integration Test Facility (GITF) testing by
comparing the test results to the SSP requirements.

I&O b. Based on assessments of test results in a. the contractor shall:

I&O (1) Identify to NASA any requirements that SIGI does not meet and
any SSP discrepancies in NASA test results.

I&O (2) Document the SIGI deficiencies and provide the report to NASA in
contractor format within 120 days following receipt of the SIGI test
data from NASA.

**1.3.18.1 Space Integrated GPS/INS Installation and Checkout**

I&O The Contractor shall install the SIGI in accordance with the GFD
SIGI installation drawing.

I&O The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Determine end to end electrical length of installed GPS RF
cables within the USL.

I&O (2) Perform a power on SIGI self test to verify from the SIGI health
and status data messages that results from the power on self test have
been accomplished in accordance with SSP 41177-05, paragraph 3.1.7, and
as represented by the GN&C/SIGI 5A flight software functionality.

I&O (3) Demonstrate successful SIGI status and data transmission on
local bus GNC 1 and 2 channels "A" and "B" MIL-STD-1553 communications.

I&O (4) Provide, upon request, electronic and hard copy versions of the
test and demonstration results in contractor format, within 120 days
after test and demonstration is performed.

**1.3.19 NODE 1 STRUT STRAIN GAUGE OUTFITTING**

DDT&E The contractor shall prepare the eight previously installed strain
gauges on the Node 1 struts for launch and on-orbit use as follows:

DDT&E 1. coat the eight strain gauges with Measurements Group AE-10
epoxy using standard procedures,

DDT&E 2. make the necessary modifications to obtain a Materials Usage
Agreement (MUA) for the eight strain gauges,

DDT&E 3. label each strain gauge pigtail with a unique identifier in
accordance with SSP 50005, paragraph 12.3.2.2, item D,

DDT&E 4. restrain the strain gauge pigtails to the Node 1 struts with
Permacel P-423 PTFE tape, and

DDT&E 5. perform continuity checks of the strain gauges after completion
of activities 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, and deliver a report in contractor
format that documents the results within 30 days after completion of the
continuity checks.

DDT&E The contractor shall provide an Acceptance Data Package (ADP) for
the Node 1 Strain Gauge Kit that consists of the following items:

DDT&E 1. an approved MUA on the strain gauges,

DDT&E 2. an approved NSPAR on the pigtail material,

DDT&E 3. a kit drawing,

DDT&E 4. build paper,

DDT&E 5. a data sheet on the Measurements Group AE-10 epoxy, and

DDT&E 6. a data sheet on the Permacel P-423 PTFE tape.

**1.3.20 UHF RADIO MEASUREMENT AND DEMONSTRATION**

I&O a. As a part of the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Radio measurement and
demonstration effort, the Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Coordinate with NASA to determine test readiness.

I&O (2) Document the data obtained and any anomalies encountered during
the UHF testing in the End Item Test Reports.

I&O (3) Retain the original audio recordings as residual test data.

I&O (4) Analyze the UHF link budget and prepare a report which documents
the link budget results, issues, and recommendations.

I&O (5) Submit to the Government, one electronic and two paper copies of
the link budget report written in contractor format no later than sixty
days after the final test report from the End Items containing the UHF
Test Data is delivered to the Government. The electronic versions shall
be compatible with MS Word, Version 7.0 and Excel, Version 7.0.

I&O b. For the United States Laboratory (USL), the Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the USL to Node 1 interface,
designated for distribution to the Airlock Intravehicular Antenna
Assembly (IAA), when the GFE Space to Space Station Radio (SSSR) is
transmitting in its low power mode. For informational purposes only, the
signal level at this interface is expected to be no less than -12.0 dBm.

I&O (2) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the USL to Node 1 interface,
designated for distribution to the Node 1 IAA, when the GFE SSSR is
transmitting in its low power mode. For informational purposes only, the
signal level at this interface is expected to be no less than -16.6 dBm.

I&O (3) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the USL to Node 2 interface,
designated for distribution to the Node 2 IAA, when the GFE SSSR is
transmitting in its low power mode. For informational purposes only, the
signal level at this interface is expected to be no less than -11.2 dBm.

I&O (4) Record 10 minutes of audio output from the USL Audio Terminal
Unit (ATU), when a UHF signal level of -84.8 dBm containing audio is
provided at the USL to USL Deployment Mechanism UHF interfaces, using
the USL, GFE SSSR, GFE GSE test console radio, 10 minutes of GFE
recorded audio on digital audio tape.

I&O (5) Record 10 minutes of audio output from the USL ATU, when a UHF
signal level of -85.5 dBm containing audio is provided at the USL to S0
ITS interfaces, using the USL, GFE SSSR, GFE GSE test console radio, 10
minutes of GFE recorded audio on digital audio tape.

I&O (6) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the two USL to ITS S0 interfaces,
when the GFE SSSR is transmitting in its low power mode. For
informational purposes only, the signal level at this interface is
expected to be no less than 21.3 dBm.

I&O (7) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the two USL to USL Deployment
Mechanism Assembly UHL interface, when the GFE SSSR is transmitting in
its low power mode. For informational purposes only, the signal level at
this interface is expected to be no less than 20.6 dBm.

I&O (8) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the two USL to ITS S0 Interfaces,
when the GFE SSSR is transmitting in its high power mode. For
informational purposes only, the signal level at this interface is
expected to be no less than 34.3 dBm.

I&O (9) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the two USL to USL Deployment
Mechanism Assembly UHL interface, when the GFE SSSR is transmitting in
its high power mode. For informational purposes only, the signal level
at this interface is expected to be no less than 33.6 dBm.

I&O (10) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss,
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR), and impedance in the frequency range
of 413 to 418 MHz for both USL UHF signal paths for AV #1 rack cable
between USL SSSR ORU connector and USL rack interface panel and USL AV
#1 standoff cable connection to USL/external antenna interface. For
informational purposes only, the line loss for this path is expected to
be less than 3.4 dB.

I&O (11) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for both USL UHF
signal paths for AV #1 rack cable between USL SSSR ORU connector and USL
rack interface panel and USL AV #1 standoff cable connection to USL/ITS
S0 interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss for this
path is expected to be less than 2.7 dB.

I&O (12) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for both USL UHF
signal paths for AV #1 rack cable between USL SSSR ORU connector and USL
rack interface panel and USL AV #1 standoff cable connection to USL/Node
2 interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss for this
path is expected to be less than 5.2 dB.

I&O (13) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for both USL UHF
signal paths for AV #1 rack cable between USL SSSR ORU connector and USL
rack interface panel and USL AV #1 standoff cable connection to USL/Node
1 IAA interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss for this
path is expected to be less than 10.6 dB.

I&O (14) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for the USL UHF
signal path for AV #1 rack cable between USL SSSR ORU connector and USL
rack interface panel and USL AV #1 standoff cable connection to USL/Node
1 interface (Airlock line). For informational purposes only, the line
loss for this path is expected to be less than 2.0 dB.

I&O (15) Record one thirty minute session of two way voice between the
USL and GFE EMU equivalent radio, where the session uses the GFE Flight
Equivalent Unit (FEU) Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) in the USL, GFE
GSE test console radio, CFE cables for connecting GFE together, GFE FEU
EMU (made of thermal micrometeoroid garment, space suit helmet prototype
EMU, EMU backpack UHF antenna, and EMU equivalent radio connected via
coaxial cable to the EMU backpack UHF antenna), a GFE SSR, and USL GSE
required to support the recordings. The recordings will be used by NASA
to determine if the USL (with the SSSR installed) and FEU EUM is capable
of voice communication between the SSSR and the FEU EMU, while the FEU
EMU is within the normally pressurized and generally Intravehicular
Activity (IVA) accessible volume of the USL.

I&O (16) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss and
VSWR in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for both USL Deployment
Mechanism Assembly UHF signal paths from the USL interface to external
UHF antennas interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss
for each of these paths is expected to be less than 0.8 dB.

I&O (17) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for the USL UHF
signal path for AV #1 rack cable between USL SSSR ORU connector and USL
rack interface panel and USL AV #1 standoff cable connection to the
USL/USL Antenna Intravehicular Antenna Assembly (IAA) interface. For
informational purposes only, the total line loss for this path is
expected to be less than 17.2 dB.

I&O (18) Perform a test to measure the UHF output signal levels in the
frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz at the USL IAA interface, designated
for distribution to the USL IAA, when the GFE Space to Space Station
Radio (SSSR) is transmitting in its low power mode. For informational
purposes only, the signal level at this interface is expected to be no
less than -6.0 dB.

I&O c. For Node 1, the Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for Node 1 UHF
signal path from the Node 1/USL IAA interface to Node 1/HAB IAA
interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss for this path
is expected to be less than 6.4 dB.

I&O (2) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR,
and impedance in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for Node 1 UHF
signal path from the Node 1/USL(Airlock) interface to Node 1/Airlock
interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss for this path
is expected to be less than 2.2 dB

I&O (3) Record 20 two-minute sessions of audio output from the GFE GSE
test console radio and record 20 two-minute sessions of audio output
from the GFE EMU equivalent radio, where each session is with the GFE
FEU EMU in a different location within the Node 1 and with the UHF
signal of -16.6 dBm injected at the Node 1/USL IAA interface and using
the Node 1, GFE GSE test console radio (configured to simulate the UHF
signal traversing the USL UHF signal path), two minutes of GFE recorded
audio on digital audio tape, GFE recorded audio player, GFE recording
tape (minimum 80 minutes recording time per session), GFE audio
recorder, GFE cables for connecting GFE together and to the Node 1, GFE
FEU EMU (made of thermal micrmeteoroid garment, space suit helmet
prototype EMU, EMU backpack UHF antenna, and EMU equivalent radio
connected via coaxial cable to the EMU backpack UHF antenna), and a GFE
SSSR, and Node 1 GSE required to support the recordings.

I&O (4) Perform a test to measure the UHF electric field strength
created by the Node 1 IVA UHF antenna, at 10 evenly distributed points
within the normally pressurized and generally IVA-accessible volume of
the Node 1, when the UHF signal level is -16.6 dBm at the Node 1 to USL
interface. For informational purposes only, the electric field strength
is expected to be greater than -43.5 dB volts per meter peak.

I&O d. For the ITS S0, the Contractor shall perform a test to measure
the UHF signal path line loss, VSWR, and impedance in the frequency
range of 413 to 418 MHz for both of the ITS S0 UHF signal paths from the
USL/ITS S0 interface to ITS S0/ITS P1 interface. For informational
purposes only, the line loss for each of these paths is expected to be
less than 2.4 dB.

I&O e. For the ITS P1, the Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss and VSWR
in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for both of the ITS P1 UHF
signal paths from the ITS S0 interface to ITS P1 Deployment Mechanism
Assembly interface. For informational purposes only, the line loss for
each of these paths is expected to be less than 2.3 dB.

I&O (2) Perform a test to measure the UHF signal path line loss and VSWR
in the frequency range of 413 to 418 MHz for both of the ITS P1
Deployment Mechanism Assemble UHF signal paths from the ITS P1 interface
to external UHF antennas interface. For informational purposes only, the
line loss for each of these paths is expected to be less than 0.8dB.

**1.3.21 S-Band and KU-Band Subsystem Testing**

I&O The contractor shall support demonstration tests of the integrated
S-Band and Ku-Band subsystems utilizing the Electronics systems Test
Laboratory (ESTL) at JSC. The testing will include Hardware/Software
Integration utilizing available Command and control Software. The
Contractor shall also support subsystems link performance
characterization testing through the

Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) System and a graduation test to
flow data to/from the on-board systems to elements of the Ground
Segment. The Contractor shall develop a test plan which includes plans
for the demonstration tests, link performance test, and graduation test.
The Contractor shall conduct a test readiness review prior to the start
of testing. The link performance characterization and graduation test
data shall be documented in Contractor format and available upon request
within 60 days after the completion of the tests.

**1.3.22 Assembly Power Converter Unit (APCU) to MPLM Electrical Power**

**Test**

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop, document in Contractor format, and
provide via contracts letter to the Government no later than 18 June 98,
APCU to MPLM Electrical Power Test Plan, which includes a test schedule
for an APCU to MPLM electrical power test at Alenia, in Turin, Italy.

I&O b. The Contractor shall allocate through the Hardware Utilization
Board and ship Contractor provided equipment to Alenia in sufficient
time to meet the scheduled test start date.

I&O c. The Contractor shall conduct a MPLM Electrical Power Test
Readiness Review prior to the scheduled test and report on the results
to the Program.

I&O d. The Contractor shall provide the APCU to MPLM Electrical Power
test report in Contractor format via contracts letter to the Government
no later than 60 days after completion of the MPLM Electrical Power
Test.

I&O e. The Contractor shall provide a maximum of four personnel to
Alenia in Turin, Italy for support and conduct of the APCU to MPLM Test
including licensing and exporting test support equipment as needed.

I&O The Contractor shall provide the Ku-Band Boom assembly with the
Space-to-Ground Transmitter/Receiver/Controller (SGTRC) mounting plate,
Ku-Band Waveguide, Part Number R080401-11, to the NASA JSC Electronics
System Test Laboratory (ESTL) facility to support Radio Frequency (RF)
testing in the June 1998 time frame.

**1.3.23 Racks for Refrigerator/Freezers**

DDT&E The contractor shall design, develop, manufacture, assemble,
verify, and deliver rack structures for Refrigerator/Freezers. The
Contractor shall support TIMs and telecons with the European space
Agency for the purpose of integration of the refrigerator/Freezer to the
Refrigerator/Freezer Rack, from June 1998 through March 2002. Travel to
Europe during this time period shall not exceed three, two week in
duration trips supported by not more than three persons per trip.

**1.3.24 Additional Bacteria Filter Elements in Node 1**

DDT&E The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and test a
stowage container for four Bacteria Filter Elements (PN SV810010) for
installation in the starboard mid-bay structure of the Node 1 end item.

DDT&E The Contractor shall perform a structural analysis and materials
and processes analysis to determine the impacts of the stowage container
to the Node 1 end item. The analysis shall be delivered to the
Government in contractor format prior to installation of the stowage
container.

DDT&E The Contractor shall install the bacteria filter elements stowage
container (including the four bacteria filter elements) in the Node 1
end item.

DDT&E The Contractor shall revise the Node 1 documentation to reflect
the addition of the stowed bacteria filters elements in Node 1.

**1.3.25 Mobile Servicing System (MSS) Thermal Analysis**

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform a one time MSS Thermal Analysis of
the MSS Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) and the MSS
Mobile Base System (MBS) for the following configurations: MSS SSRMS on
Launch Deploy Assembly (LDA); and MSS SSRMS on MSS MBS using Government
Furnished Data (GFD).

I&O b. The Contractor shall provide MSS Thermal Analysis Reports to the
Government in Contractor format within 90 days after completion of
analysis.

**1.3.26 Node 1 Label**

DDT&E The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and test a label
for installation on the aft, starboard quadrant of the Node 1 end item.
The label shall have the text, size, and font as defined by a Government
Furnished Date provided.

DDT&E The Contractor shall perform a thermal analysis, structural
analysis, and materials and processes analysis to determine the impacts
of the label to the Node 1 end item. The analysis shall be delivered to
the Government in contractor format prior to installation of the label.

DDT&E The Contractor shall install the labor on the Node 1 end item.

DDT&E Any additional Space Station on-orbit and launch resources shall
be provided from Government reserves.

DDT&E The Contractor shall revise the Node 1 documentation to reflect
the addition of the label on Node 1.

**1.3.27 Radiator ORU Thermal Vacuum Demonstration**

I&O The Contractor shall develop, document in contractor format, and
deliver the radiator ORU thermal vacuum test procedures to the
Government 30 days prior to the scheduled test.

I&O The Contractor shall ship the Contractor supplied demonstration
equipment to the NASA Plum Brook facility in Ohio to meet the scheduled
test.

I&O The Contractor shall conduct a Test Readiness review (TRR) one week
prior to the scheduled test.

I&O The Contractor shall conduct a Thermal Vacuum mechanism
demonstration of a flight Radiator ORU at the NASA Plum Brook facility
in Ohio.

I&O The Contractor shall provide an analysis of all flight units ambient
deployment torques compared with the results from the Plumbrook thermal
vacuum test no later than 30 days after the final ambient deployment of
the last flight unit.

I&O The Contractor shall provide test results, in contractor format, to
NASA within 90 days after completed of test.

1.  **Reserved**

**1.3.28 Tether Locations**

DDT&E The Contractor shall revise drawings to eliminate one tether
shuttle launch locations and associated brackets. The Contractor shall
eliminate both tether shuttles from the SO launch manifest.

**1.3.29 Docked Audio Interface Unit (DAIU) to Russian Audio Interface
Unit (RAIU)**

**Interface Jumper Cable**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test, and
deliver to the Government a DAIU to RAIU Jumper Cable.

DDT&E b. The DAIU to RAIU jumper cable shall:

DDT&E (1) provide temporary audio connectivity from the Endcone DAIU to
the RAIU cabling located adjacent to the proposed location of the
Avionics 3 Rack in (X-3) standoff until installation of the Avionics 3
Rack and

DDT&E (2) be IVA installable and removable.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall develop and provide to the Government the
DAIU to RAIU Jumper Cable interface documentation in supplier format to
include technical data for cable/plug installation/removal.
Documentation shall be delivered with the hardware.

**1.3.30 EVA Crewmember Tool Impact Loads**

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform an analysis of the USOS on-orbit
nonstructural glass or ceramic materials located outside the pressurized
volume using the aluminum Articulating Portable Foot Restraint mass of
60 pounds with a translation velocity of one foot per second and a 0.04
inch radius circle impact point to determine if this contract will
produce a condition which could cause injury to the crew or damage to
the vehicle.

I&O b. The Contractor shall provide an analysis report documenting the
analysis methodology and results in contractor format within 90 days
after completion of the analysis.

I&O c. The Contractor shall document any items which are determined to
produce a condition which could cause injury to the crew or damage to
the vehicle, in a Hazard Analysis Report and submit this report in
accordance with DR SM02, within 90 days after completion of the tool
impact analysis.

**1.3.31.1 Node 2 to CAM Vestibule Jumpers**

DDT&E The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test and deliver
Node 2 to CAM vestibule jumpers in accordance with SSP 41147. The
vestibule jumpers shall route the electrical power from the Node 2 to
the CAM inside the normally pressurized volume of Node 2 to CAM
vestibule.

**1.3.31.2 Development of PIRN to ICD for Vestibule Jumpers**

I&O The Contractor shall build a Part I PIRN to SSP 41147 ICD to
identify the jumper characteristics of the Node 2 to CAM vestibule
jumpers which route the electrical power from the Node 2 to the

CAM inside the normally pressurized volume of Node 2 to CAM vestibule.
The Contractor shall provide support for coordination, issue resolution,
and finalizing of the PIRN with the other participants to the ICD.

**1.3.32 Airlock Pressure Relief**

DDT&E The Contractor shall modify the Airlock to allow zero-fault
tolerance for positive pressure relief of the Airlock pressure shell by
replacing the Positive Pressure Relief Valve with a Manual Pressure
Equalization Valve.

**1.3.33 Node 2 Emulator**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain a Node 2
Emulator Specification.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and test a
Node 2 Electrical Power System Emulator as test support equipment.

I&O c. The Contractor shall develop, document in contractor format, and
deliver the Node 2 Emulator test procedures to the Government prior to
the planned tests.

I&O d. The Contractor shall ship the Contractor supplied test equipment
to the required location to meet the test schedule.

I&O e. The Contractor shall conduct the Node 2 Emulator Test
ReadinessReview (TRR) one week prior to testing dates.

I&O f. The Contractor shall provide support to the Node 2 Emulator
operation, maintenance, and conduct testing in the following manner:

I&O (1) Utilize the Node 2 Emulator for two tests in Tsukuba, Japan
(NASDA), one in 1998 and one in 1999, and for two tests in Bremen,
Germany (ESA), one in 1999 and one in 2001.

I&O (2) Provide support for tests utilizing the Node 2 Emulator at NASDA
in Japan.

I&O (3) Provide support for tests utilizing the Node 2 Emulator at ESA
in Germany.

I&O (4) Provide support for the Node 2 Emulator Technical Interchange
Meeting in Tsukuba, Japan.

I&O g. Provide the test results, in contractor format, within 120 days
after each test is performed.

**1.3.34 Internal Thermal Control System (ITCS) Jumper Sets**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test, and
deliver the following ITCS Jumper Sets:

DDT&E (1) ITCS Airlock/Cabin Air Heat Exchanger Jumper Set, which allows
airlock functionality or cabin heat exchanger functionality in the case
of a the USL ITCS loop loss due to leakage and is suitable for its
intended temporary use on-orbit as a failure work around.

DDT&E (2) ITCS Gamma Fitting Jumper Set, which permits bypass of a
leaking coldplate and is suitable for its intended temporary use
on-orbit as a failure work around.

DDT&E (3) ITCS Loop Crossover Assembly Manual Jumper Set, which replaces
the Loop Crossover Assembly in case of a leak and is suitable for its
intended temporary use on-orbit as a failure work around.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain the ITCS
Jumper Sets documentation in accordance with DR PC05.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall perform a Fit and Leak Check Test of the
ITCS Jumper Sets where the testing includes; fit check and leak
detection testing with Flight Equipment and includes developing test
plans, conducting test requirements reviews, conducting the tests,
documenting the test results in contractor format, and providing a copy
of the test results via contracts to the Government within 60 days after
completion of the tests.

**1.3.35 Ammonia Jumper Kit**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall modify the Photovoltaic (PV) Module P6 and
Ammonia Servicer to interface with the Ammonia Jumper Kit and revised
the associated documentation to document the new configuration of PV
Module P6 and the Ammonia Servicer.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test, and
deliver an Ammonia Jumper Kit which is suitable for temporary on-orbit
use as a failure work around that provides a route for ammonia from a
Photovoltaic Thermal Control System (PVTCS) loop with a failed radiator
to one loop of one Early External Active Thermal Control System (EEATCS)
radiator.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain the
Ammonia Jumper Kit documentation in accordance with DR PC05.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall perform a Fit and Leak Check Test of the
Ammonia Jumper Kit where the testing includes; fit check and leak
detection testing with Flight Equipment and includes developing a test
plan, conducting a test requirements review, conducting the testing,
documenting the test results in contractor format, and providing a copy
of the test results via contracts to the Government within 60 days after
completion of the test.

DDT&E e. The Contractor shall develop, document in contractor format,
and provide to the Government via contracts letter, the Ammonia Jumper
Kit neutral buoyancy test plan 60 days prior to the Ammonia Jumper Kit
NBL test.

DDT&E f. The Contractor shall conduct a the Ammonia Jumper Kit NBL Test
Readiness Review (TRR).

DDT&E g. The Contractor shall provide a PV Module P6, Ammonia Servicer,
and Ammonia Jumper Kit mockup which will be used for the Ammonia Jumper
Kit NBL test at JSC during the first quarter of Calendar Year (CY) 1999.

DDT&E h. The Contractor shall conduct the Ammonia Jumper Kit NBL test at
the JSC NBL during the first quarter of CY 1999.

DDT&E i. The Contractor shall provide to the Government via contracts
letter, the Space Station to Ammonia Jumper Kit NBL test results in
contractor format within 60 after completion of the Ammonia Jumper Kit
NBL testing.

DDT&E j. The Contractor shall perform a one time Ammonia Jumper Kit
Thermal Analysis to determine the ISS on-orbit Space Station
capabilities and constraints when using the Ammonia Jumper Kit, document
the analysis and analysis results in contractor format as an Ammonia
Jumper Kit Thermal Analysis Report, and provide a copy of the report via
contracts letter to the Government within 90 days after completion of
the analysis.

DDT&E k. The Contractor shall perform an Ammonia Flow Test of the
Ammonia Jumper Kit where the testing includes; ammonia flow testing with
Flight Equipment and includes developing a test plan, conducting a test
requirements review, conducting the testing, documenting the test
results in contractor format, and providing a copy of the test results
via contracts to the Government within 60 days after completion of the
test.

**1.3.36 Lab Cradle Assembly to USL Module Integrated Assembly and Fit
Check**

I&O The Contractor shall conduct a physical interface verification (fit
check) of the Lab Cradle Assembly (LCA) flight article to the USL flight
article at KSC, and final assembly of the integrated LCA to USL
interface at KSC during the 5A USL processing flow prior to final launch
package integration. The final assembly and fit check shall be performed
with the USL in the Launch Package Integration Stand or Cargo Element
Work Stand, with vertical extensions in place to sufficiently elevate
the USL and allow access to the keel fitting.

I&O The fit check shall include:

I&O a) Ground pre-adjustment of the LCA aft strut

I&O b) Validation of LCA to USL alignment parameters

I&O c) Validation of Class R grounding/bonding

I&O d) Evaluation of EVA gloved hand access to interfaces and visibility
of alignment markings/indicators

I&O e) Validation of cable lengths, routing, tie downs, and connector
mate/demate (per ECP 571).

**1.3.37 Depress Pump Muffler Development and Qualification Testing**

DDT&E 1) The Contractor shall design, develop, test, and manufacture the
Pump Muffler that reduces the Russian Depress pump noise level such that
the Airlock acoustic environment does not exceed the US NC-59 plus 5 dB
criterion for noise sources averaged over any 10 second time interval as
specified in SSP 50005, paragraph 5.4 during Campout depress.

DDT&E 2) The Contractor shall test the Pump Muffler to assure
performance within the specified limits and provide a test report to the
Government, via contracts letter, in the contractor's format within 90
days after completing the tests.

**1.3.38 Space Integrated Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation
System Enhancement**

DDT&E The Contractor shall modify USL documentation to add the Space
Integrated Global Positioning System Inertial Navigation system (SIGI)
pigtail kit cable layout and tie down locations to accommodate the kit
installation from the SIGI to the interface panel for each of the two
SIGIs in the USL.

DDT&E The Contractor shall install the Government provided SIGI pigtail
kit in the USL in accordance with the Government provided installation
and check out procedures.

DDT&E The Contractor shall perform regression testing of the Government
provided SIGI firmware update in the USL within 30 days of installation
and submit the results via a contract letter to the Government in
contractor format within 60 days of test completion.

**1.3.39 Airlock Hatch Leak Testing**

DDT&E a) The Contractor shall modify the Airlock Intra-Vehicular
Activity (IVA) hatch-mounting points to eliminate alignment adjustments
required during on-orbit installation.

DDT&E b) The Contractor shall perform mechanical tests and leak checks
of the Airlock IVA hatch installed in both the on-orbit and launch
locations prior to launch. The Contractor shall provide a test report to
the Government, via contracts letter, in contractor's format within 45
days after completing the tests.

**1.3.40 Worksite Interfaces for USL Heat Exchangers**

DDT&E The Contractor shall add an EVA Worksite Interface (WIF) for each
USL heat exchanger, per Government provided direction for the WIF
locations.

**1.3.41 USL Moderate Temperature Heat Exchanger Supply Line**

DDT&E The Contractor shall modify the ammonia supply line tubing for the
USL Aft Endcone to allow the tubing to be removed and reinstalled into
the heat exchanger by straightening out the feedthrough end of the line,
so that there is no bend between the feedthrough and the peak of the
arch.

**1.3.42 Additional MATEs and FEU MDMs for Software Development and
Testing**

DDT&E To support GN&C, software development activities and testing
activities, the Contractor shall:

DDT&E a) Provide 9 additional MATE units.

DDT&E b) Provide 12 additional FEU enhanced MDMs.

DDT&E c) Provide 5 ICE Units.

DDT&E d) Provide 2 additional FEU standard MDMs.

DDT&E e) Provide 2 FEU Multi-MDMs.

DDT&E f) Provide 5 RTIOPs.

DDT&E g) Associated Spares

**1.3.43 ISS Airlock Testing**

I&O a) The contractor shall test the Airlock and Extravehicular Mobility
Unit (EMU) to assure performance within the on orbit Space Station
environments and provide a test report to the Government, via contracts
letter, in contractor's format within 120 days after completing the
tests.

I&O b) Using Government provided EMU and hardware, the Contractor shall
test the EMU, by performing tests and fit-checks as defined in the
detailed verification objectives DVOs, and provide a test report to the
Government, via contracts letter, in contractor's format within 120 days
after completing the tests.

I&O c) Using Government provided hardware, the Contractor shall perform
the Orlan tests, and provide a test report to the Government, via
contracts letter, in contractor's format within 120 days after
completing the tests.

**1.3.44 Management of RF Performance Data**

I&O a) The Contractor shall provide RF performance data for contractor
provided equipment in accordance with DR VE41.

I&O b) The Contractor shall add Government provided RF Performance data
to the Vehicle Master Database (VMDB) from up to 25 equipment items
during CY 1998, 35 equipment items during CY 1999, and 20 equipment
items per year thereafter until the end of contract period of
performance. Data shall be loaded into the VMDB within 90 days of
receipt.

**1.3.45 ADA Compiler Licenses**

DDT&E The Contractor shall purchase the buyout of Aonix ActivAda
Compiler licenses hosted on Microsoft Windows NT for use in the
production of ISS Flight code, where the Aonix ActivAda Compiler buyout
license includes:

a\) ActiAda Real Time ProPack for PC-NT hosts, P/N AD-0088-AWDE-PR;

b)  PharLap 8.0 Linker/Assembler, P/N AD-088-SETS-PR;

c)  Annual Maintenance for 1 year, P/N AD-088-AWDE-MA;

d)  Rights for unlimited deployment of ActiADA Real Time ProPack for all
    ISS Flight code activities;

e)  Right to upgrade without additional buyout and license cost to
    ObjectAda Real-Time RAVEN for all ISS Flight code activities until
    6/30/02; and

f)  Object compilation to NT platform for all ISS Flight code
    activities.

DDT&E The Contractor shall purchase the buyout of Aonix ActivAda
Compiler licenses hosted on Microsoft Windows NT for use in the
production of ISS Flight code, where the Aonix ActivAda Compiler buyout
license includes:

a)  Annual Maintenance for ActivAda beginning July 1,2000 through June
    30, 2002.

b)  AdaWorld for Vax/VMS to 386 Cross Compiler.

c)  PharLap Toolset

d)  Rights for unlimited deployment of AdaWorld for Vax/VMS to 386 Cross
    compiler and PharLap Toolset for all ISS Flight code activities.

e)  Annual Maintenance from July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2001 for
    Adaworld for Vax/VMS to 386 Cross Compiler and Pharlap Toolset.

f)  Annual Maintenance for ObjectAda native NT compilers from July 1,
    2000 through December 31, 2002.

g)  Y2K compliance testing for executable code and toolsets.

h)  Prototyping, identifying and evaluating a means to debut.
    Programmatically Loaded Ada DLLs.

**1.3.46 Interim Resistive Device**

I&O The Contractor shall perform a structural analysis to determine if
Node 1 is capable of accommodating IRED at the identified locations. The
Contractor shall provide the IRED structural analysis report in
Contractor format to the Government via contracts letter by April 1,
1999.

**1.3.47 Thermal Extreme Testing and Random Vibration Testing to
Trailing Umbilical System Cable Guide Acceptance Testing**

I&O The Contractor shall perform thermal extreme and random vibration
acceptance testing on the Trailing Umbilical System (TUS) Cable Guide
Assemblies (CGA). Testing will be on the first 16 CGAs built and on 2
batches of 4 of the remaining CGAs.

**1.3.48 Service Module Digital Preassembly Measurement**

I&O The Contractor shall:

I&O a) Develop Test Plans and Procedures for Digital Preassembly (DPA)
measurements of the Service Module (SM).

I&O b) Conduct a Test Readiness Review (TRR) for the DPA of the SM.

I&O c) Conduct a Facilities Readiness Review prior to taking the DPA
measurements

I&O d) Given the required access to facilities and flight equipment,
take DPA measurements of the Service Module (SM) in facilities provided
by the Government in Baikonur, Kazakhstan to obtain the following:

I&O 1) Location of the SVS Targets (both location and orientation)

I&O 2) Center of the zenith SM docking ports (planarity, location, and
clocking)

I&O 3) Location of Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) retroreflectors

I&O e. Prepare SM DPA measurement report in Contractor format and submit
to the Government via contracts letter no later than 120 days after
completion of the DPA measurements.

**1.3.49 Design and Fabricate Electrical Power System Node 1 Patch Panel
Y Cable and the**

**USL Secondary Power Distribution Assembly Jumper Cable**

DDT&E For the Electrical Power System (EPS) Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable
and the USL Secondary Power Distribution Assembly (SPDA ) Jumper Cable,
the Contractor shall:

DDT&E a. Design, develop, fabricate, test, and deliver cables that meet
the following requirements:

DDT&E 1) The EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable shall connect the
Russian-American Converter Units (RACU) and the Remote Power
Distribution Assembly (RPDA) connectors within a single Patch Panel in
the Node 1 Port Alcove, to provide power to the Node 1 cabin air fan and
the Intermodule Ventilation (IMV) fan prior to Photovoltaic (PV) Module
P6 activation.

DDT&E 2) The USL SPDA Jumper shall connect from the Node 1 Patch Panel
Y-cable (P302) to the input connector for the USL Aft Endcone SPDA (SPDA
LAAFT-2B).

DDT&E 3) The cables shall be suitable for their intended temporary use
on-orbit.

DDT&E 4) The cables shall be IVA installable and removable.

DDT&E b. Develop, document, and maintain the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel
Y-cable and USL SPDA Jumper Cable documentation in accordance with DR
PC05**.**

DDT&E c. Assign a Test Director, prepare a test plan, and conduct
testing and analysis of the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL
SPDA Jumper Cable, which shall consist of continuity testing, high
voltage potential testing, a fit check, and a suitability analysis. The
continuity and high voltage potential tests, a fit check and the
suitability analysis shall be included as part of "The EPS Node 1 Patch
Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable Acceptance Data Package" to
be provided in accordance with DRD PC08.

DDT&E 1) The continuity testing of the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable
and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable shall consist of measuring the resistance
of the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable
electrical paths. The EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA
Jumper Cable continuity test shall be considered successful when it is
shown that the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper
Cable provides the required electrical conductivity (paths) needed to
accomplish the rerouting of electrical power.

DDT&E 2) The high voltage potential test of the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel
Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable shall consist of applying a high
voltage potential to each of the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the
USL SPDA Jumper Cable electrical paths one at a time and measuring the
leakage from the powered path to the other paths. The EPS Node 1 Patch
Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable High voltage potential test
shall be considered successful when it is shown that the EPS Node 1
Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable electrical paths can
withstand the high voltage potential.

DDT&E 3) The fit check of the USL SPDA Jumper Cable shall be done with
the USL Flight Element at the Kennedy Space Center. The fit check shall
be considered successful when it is shown that the USL SPDA Jumper Cable
can be successfully installed.

DDT&E 4) The suitability analysis of the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable
and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable shall consist of analyzing the EPS Node 1
Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable design, analyzing
verification data, and analyzing test data to determine the EPS Node 1
Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable suitability for its
intended temporary use on-orbit. Where the analysis of the EPS Node 1
Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable design shows the EPS
Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable design is
similar to other Space Station equipment which has been shown to be
suitable for on-orbit use, the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the
USL SPDA Jumper Cable shall be considered suitable for intended on-orbit
use by similarity. Where the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL
SPDA Jumper Cable design is unique, an inspection or analysis shall be
conducted and the results analyzed for EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable
and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable suitability for its intended temporary use
on-orbit. The EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper
Cable Suitability analysis shall be considered successful when the
analysis shows the EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA
Jumper Cable is suitable for its intended temporary use on-orbit.

DDT&E d. Provide separate EPS Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL
SPDA Jumper Cable Test and Analysis Reports to the Government, via
contracts letter, in contractor format, within 60 days of completion of
each of the continuity and high voltage potential tests, the fit check,
and the suitability analysis of each cable.

DDT&E e. Provide installation instructions in contractor format, and an
Acceptance Data Package (ADP) in accordance with DR PC08, for the EPS
Node 1 Patch Panel Y-cable and the USL SPDA Jumper Cable, to the
Government, within 30 days of delivery of the cable set.

**1.3.50 FGB Stowage Bags**

OPD a. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test, and
deliver FGB Stowage Enclosures which are suitable to provide storage in
FGB stowage zones 1, 3, 4, 14, and 17. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall
satisfy the FGB volume allocations defined by the Contractor and shall
preclude interference with already installed hardware and keep out
zones. The Contractor shall provide one flight unit and one training
unit for each zone.

OPD b. The Contractor shall perform a physical interface verification
(fit check) of the FGB Stowage Enclosure flight article bags in the
corresponding FGB stowage zones 1, 3, 4, 14, and 17 of the rack training
mockup at the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center in Russia and shall
provide a copy of the test results in contractor format to the
Government within 60 days after completion of the test.

OPD c. The Contractor shall support coordination with NASA and SpaceHab
for the purpose of integrating the FGB Stowage Enclosures within the
SpaceHab module. The Contractor shall provide to the Government in
contractor format a definition of the physical characteristics of the
FGB Stowage Enclosure bags which include size, weight, and
folded/transportable dimensions.

OPD d. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall meet the following requirements:

1\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall be transportable to orbit, unfilled
and in their launch configuration, via the SpaceHab module.

2.  The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall be transferable through hatches
    from the SpaceHab module through Node 1 to FGB in launch (stowed)
    configuration. Individual enclosures or bundles of enclosures shall
    be designed to minimize crew transfer operations.

> 3\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall be capable of being restrained
> using Contractor provided FGB bungees.
>
> 4\. The materials selected for the FGB Stowage Enclosures shall be in
> accordance with SSP 50094, paragraph 4.3.4.
>
> 5\. Enclosures shall meet workmanship requirements in accordance with
> SSP 50094, paragraph 4.3.4.6.
>
> 6\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall provide stowage capability for at
> least 15 years.
>
> 7\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall withstand transfer from the
> Orbiter, installation into the FGB racks, removal from the FGB racks
> and collapse, for at least 20 times (including fit check use) without
> breaking or requiring maintenance.
>
> 8\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall comply with the following Safety
> requirements:
>
> a\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall not inhibit fire detection or
> suppression systems.
>
> b\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall be capable of withstanding the
> differential pressure of depressurization, repressurization, and the
> depressurized condition without resulting in a hazard.
>
> c\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall not protrude into the FGB cabin
> aisleway.
>
> d\. All surfaces of the FGB Stowage Enclosures shall not have any
> sharp edges or burrs.

OPD 9. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall comply with the following Crew
Interface requirements:

> a\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall meet requirements for functional
> accessibility zones in accordance with SSP 50094, paragraph 6.1.3.3.
>
> b\. The FGB Stowage Enclosures shall support installation and removal
> by 5^th^ percentile female and 95^th^ percentile male as specified in
> SSP 50094, section 6.1.3.
>
> c\. Enclosures shall accommodate installation/removal/collapsing
> without tools or using tools available onboard the ISS at 2A.1 flight
> completion as specified in SSP 54101-02A.1, Annex 1.
>
> d\. Crew time to install each FGB Enclosure shall not exceed 20
> minutes.
>
> e\. Enclosures shall be removable to provide access for
> maintenance/repair of the FGB hardware located behind enclosures. Crew
> time to remove each FGB Stowage Enclosure shall not exceed 20 minutes.
>
> f\. Enclosures shall meet labeling requirements in accordance with SSP
> 50094, paragraph 6.4.7.
>
> g\. Enclosure shall support routine housekeeping as specified in SSP
> 50094, paragraphs 6.3.3.1.5, 6.4.1, and 6.4.6.

OPD 10. For the requirements 1 through 9 above, the Contractor shall
develop a verification plan, conduct a verification requirements review,
conduct the verification, document the verification results in
contractor format, and provide a copy of the verification results via
contracts to the Government within 60 days after completion of the
verification.

**1.3.51 Evaluation and Analysis of Active CBM Controller**

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Perform functional test and analysis of Controller Panel Assembly
(CPA) and Capture Latch Assembly (CLA) with ground straps not installed.

I&O b. Perform Safety/Hazard Analysis, in accordance with DR SM 02, of
CPA and CLA for operation without ground strap.

I&O c. Provide CPA and CLA functional test report and analysis reports
to the Government in contractor format within 60 days after completion
of the analysis and test via contracts letter.

**1.3.52 EVA Compatible Labels for Active CBM Cabling**

DDT&E The Contractor shall design, develop, manufacture, and install EVA
compatible labels which are in accordance with SSP 50005, paragraph
9.5.3.1.

**1.3.53 Photovoltaic Module P6 Batteries**

DDT&E a) The Contractor shall remove three SAFT batteries from the PV
Module P6.

DDT&E b) The Contractor shall install, document, and verify three Eagle
Picher batteries on PV Module P6.

DDT&E c) The Contractor shall document the verification results.

OPD d) The Contractor shall replace P6 flight batteries with units
having less accrued age before flight.

54. **Data Records for OP05 Previously Submitted Imagery**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support to generate data records fro
previously submitted images, in accordance with DR OP05.

**1.3.54.1 Data records for Other Previously Submitted Imagery**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support and submit data records for
existing JSC ISS Imagery Library photographs.

**1.3.54.2 Pre-Flight Imagery Plans**

I&O For each assembly cargo element, the Contractor shall develop and
submit to the Government prior to June 30, 1999, a plan of pre-flight
imagery requirements versus hardware items in accordance with OP05
format, for flights prior to and including 8A.

**1.3.54.3 Reporting and Imagery Working Group Support**

I&O The Contractor shall participate as a full Imagery Working Group
member.

4.  **Pre-Flight Imagery**

I&O a. The Contractor shall document the configuration of flight
hardware during its assembly, test integration, and close-out using
still and video imager.

I&O b. The Contractor shall generate and deliver the imagery to NASA in
accordance with Data Requirement OP26, Pre-Flight Imagery Plans and
Imagery Documentation.

I&O c. The contractor shall provide preflight imagery of the Integrated
Cargo Carrier (ICC) and the

ORUs for flight 5A.1, to document hardware configuration during
integration and closeout of the

Items onto the ICC, using still and video imagery.

**1.3.55 Manually Operated Power Off Capability**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall implement a Manually Operated Rack Power
Switch (RPS) design using a manually operated two-position lever lock
switch on each of the contractor provided electrically powered System
Racks.

DDT&E b. The Manually Operated RPS design shall be such that, when the
RPS is in the normal open position, it causes the RPS discrete to be low
and, when the RPS is in the crew actuated closed position, it causes the
RPS discrete to be high.

DDT&E c. The Manually Operated RPS design shall monitor each of the
System and Payload Rack RPS discretes.

DDT&E d. The Manually Operated RPS design shall command the removal of
electrical power from a rack and disable reapplication of power to the
rack, when the rack's RPS discrete is high.

DDT&E e. The Manually Operated RPS design shall enable the electrical
power application to the rack, when the rack's RPS discrete is low.

DDT&E f. The Contractor shall provide RPSs for other electrically
powered Racks, where the switch uses the same rack design implementation
as used for the System Rack part of the Manually Operated RPS design.

**1.3.56 Additional Hardware and Software Integration Testing**

I&O a. Using Contractor and Government provided data, the Contractor
shall develop End-to-End Functional Checkout Test procedures for the
tests required by D684-10641-01 which will use Contractor and Government
provided hardware and software, but excludes International Partner
hardware and software, representing the end-to-end function.

I&O b. The Contractor shall conduct a Test Requirements Review (TRR)
prior to the End-to-End Functional Checkout Testing.

I&O c. The Contractor shall conduct the End-to-End Functional Checkout
Testing using Contractor and Government provided hardware, software, and
support.

I&O d. The Contractor shall provide the End-to-End Functional Checkout
Test Results Reports to the Government in contractor format within 120
days of completing the test.

**1.3.57 Scar for Star Tracker**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall provide an ITS S0 interface which will
accommodate the future addition of a Star Tracker ORU.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall provide a mounting structure with a
maximum 30 inch by 30 inch EVA compatible mounting base to accommodate a
EVA compatible Star Tracker ORU which has a maximum height of 30 inches
and a maximum mass of 75 lbm.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall conduct an ITS S0 Star Tracker Mounting
Location Field-of-View (FOV) Analysis, generate a report in contractor
format containing the analysis methodology and FOVs available for the
Star Tracker ORU from the ITS S0 Star Tracker mounting location, and
provide ITS S0 Star Tracker FOV report to the Government via contracts
letter within 90 days of completing the analysis.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall provide EVA compatible cables for
connecting to the Star Tracker ORU.

DDT&E e. The Contractor shall provide two independent electrical power
feeds with each providing up to 125 watts maximum of electrical power at
the Star Tracker ORU interface.

DDT&E f. The Contractor shall provide electrical connections to two ITS
S0 GN&C MIL-STD-1553 local bus stubs at the Star Tracker ORU interface.

**1.3.58 SO and MT Launch to Activation Survivability**

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform thermal, structural, and operations
analysis for 8A Launch to activation mission phase for flight planning
and verification. The analysis shall consider flight attitude
restrictions.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall provide hardware required for the SO and
MT to survive the 8A launch to activation mission phase, to include
verification, checkout, fit checks, and EVA compatibility assessments.

**1.3.59 ESSMDM Development and Qualification Testing**

OPD a) The Contractor shall develop a specification for the Solid State
Mass Memory Unit (SSMMU) in accordance with DR VE07, that documents the
derived and allocated SSP 41000 requirements.

OPD b) The Contractor shall design, develop, test, and manufacture the
SSMMU that meets the combined derived and allocated requirements of ISS
SSP 41000, as documented in the SSMMU development specification,
SP-M-615.

OPD c) The Contractor shall test the SSMU with a version of the Command
and control (CCS) software, and with a version of the Payload Executive
Processor (PEP) software to provide confidence these will function with
the SSMMU.

**1.3.60 US Laboratory Module Vibratory Microgravity Measurements and
Test**

I&O The Contractor shall prepare for and conduct a Vibratory
Microgravity Measurement Test (VMMT) for measuring and recording
accelerations and sound pressures at selected locations in the U.S.
Laboratory (USL) module.

I&O The contractor shall perform an analysis documenting the results of
the testing.

**1.3.61 Russian Laptop Computer Display Test**

OPD The contractor shall witness the verification test in Russia for the
displaying of the C&W events received from the USOS on the Russian
laptop computers. The Contractor shall generate a report in contractor
format summarizing the test witnessed and deliver the report to the
Government within 60 days of completion of test.

I&O **1.3.62 International Partner Module Common Berthing Mechanism
Structural Analysis**

The Contractor shall conduct an integrated structural analysis of the
Active Common Berthing Mechanism (ACBM) to Passive Common Berthing
Mechanism (PCBM) and ACBM/PCBM to element joints in support of
International Partner (IP) module certification for the Node 2, Node 3,
JEM, ELM-PS, APM and MPLM.

I&O **1.3.63 International Partner Module Common Berthing Mechanism
Acceptance Testing**

The Contractor shall define the system Level Acceptance Test Activity
(including testing) and prepare a system level Acceptance Test Plan for
the CBMs on the IP Modules.

# I&O 1.3.64 Cupola

The Cupola will be GFE to the ISS. Data associated with the Cupola for
Contractor integration activities will be provided in accordance with
Attachment J-2.

# DDT&E 1.3.64.1 Common Hardware Related to Cupola

The Contractor shall deliver Hardware for installation in Cupola in
accordance with the DIL. This hardware shall be considered Common
Hardware and controlled in accordance with SSP 41170, paragraphs
3.3.2.2, 3.3.2.3, and 3.3.2.4. Prior to establishment of the NASA
baseline as specified in SSP 41170, the Contractor shall provide
notification of changes to the Common Hardware to the Government. The
Contractor shall perform traceability from the common component Hardware
to the Cupola specification (SSP50333) in accordance with DR VE24.

I&O **1.3.64.2 Design Review Support**

The Contractor shall provide technical support to NASA for reviews of
the Cupola.

I&O **1.3.64.3 Cupola Specification Maintenance**

The Contractor shall maintain the Cupola specification (SSP 50333) in
accordance with DR VE07.

I&O **1.3.64.4 Cupola Verification Support**

a.  The Contractor shall perform Fluid and Cable fit-checks of the
    Cupola side of the interface with Node 1 vestibule jumpers.

b.  The Contractor shall perform the digital Pre-assembly tasks for
    Cupola at KSC.

c.  The Contractor shall perform the Fluid and Cable Fit Checks for
    Cupola at KCS after Cupola delivery.

**1.3.64.5 PCBM Kits**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall deliver the Passive Common Berthing
Mechanism(PCBM) kit (including the equipment, installation instructions,
checkout procedures, and kit proofing) in accordance with the DIL. The
Contractor shall provide the personnel for ESA technicians to consult,
during the ESA installation of the PCBM rings and mechanisms as well as
the ATP, on-site at the ESA contractor.

I&O b. The Contractor shall provide the Passive CBM finite element model
in contractor format.

I&O c. Based on the Cupola PCBM finite element model, the Contractor
shall verify that the Cupola installation has not invalidated the CBM
structural verification.

I&O d. The Contractor shall perform the integrated structural analysis
of the PCBM and Cupola while it is attached to Node 1.

I&O e. The Contractor shall perform end-to-end berthing analysis in
order to assure that the Cupola can be mated to Node 1.

I&O f. The Contractor shall modify the PCBM rings to include the
interface holes for the Cupola Restraints and Mobility capability. This
new interface shall be documented in SSP 41004, part II.

I&O **1.3.64.6 Common Hardware Storage**

The Contractor shall provide the storage space to accommodate all of the
U.S. contractor provided Cupola Component Hardware from the time of
delivery to NASA per the DIL until NASA delivery to ESA per the NASA to
NASA GFEL.

I&O **1.3.64.7 Cupola Glass Requirements**

The Contractor shall develop and maintain specifications and Interface
Control Drawings for the Cupola Glass to be delivered in accordance with
the DIL. The Cupola Glass shall meet all requirements as defined in SSP
50333, paragraph 3.3.12.1.5 and 3.3.12.1.5.1.

I&O **1.3.64.8 Window Frame Technical Support**

The Contractor shall provide support to assist NASA/ESA with Cupola
window frame design and development.

**OPD 1.3.64.9 Cupola Debris Panes Redesign**

1.  The Contractor shall develop and implement an approach to modify the
    exiting Debris Panes and also produce new debris panes for the ESA
    Cupola to accommodate debris panes assembly replacement both EVA and
    IVA.

> 2\. The Contractor shall develop this approach using Cupola test and
> flight frames provided to the Contractor by Alenia.

65. **Thermal Analysis for Debris Shields**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide for NASA supplied Space Vision System
targets and relocation of the Flight Releaseable Grapple Fixture (FRGF)
on the USL per SSP 50228.

66. **Test Support to RSC-E for EM Testing**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support to Energia (RSC-E)
electromagnetic testing to verify requirements of SSP 50094: paragraphs
3.4.1.2.4, and 3.4.1.2.5 for the Progress, Soyuz, and Russian Orlan EVA
Suits.

67. **U.S./NASDA Joint Video and Audio Testing**

> I&O For Joint Video and Audio Testing, the Contractor shall

a)  Provide Joint Video Test Plans and Procedures

b)  Provide Contractor unique test hardware and software for the U.S.
    and Japan tests. This includes transportation and maintenance of the
    test equipment

c)  Perform in the U.S. and support testing in Japan.

    65. **SVF and ISIL Support for the MCC**

> I&O The Contractor shall support software system testing for mission
> operations as follows:

a.  Mission Control Center Development Software

b.  Mission Control Center Operational Readiness Testing

c.  Stage Testing

d.  Mission Configuration Testing

    65. **Provide Scar for Ethernet/MIL-STD-1553 Growth Capability**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide an Airlock wiring scar to support
Ethernet/MIL-STD-1553 growth capability.

66. **EVA and IVA Window Debris Pane Changeout**

OPD a. The contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and deliver a
USL and JEM debris pane containment cover interface mod kit that
provides the interface between the Government provided debris pane
containment cover and the USL module and JEM***.***

b.  The Contractor shall install the USL debris pane containment cover
    interface mod kit onto the USL for launch.

c.  The Contractor shall conduct electronic and flight hardware fit
    check to demonstrate mechanical fit and EVA compatibility.

d.  The Contractor shall design and deliver a USL window stack mockup
    and two Cupola window stack mockups. Cupola window stack mockups
    shall be based on Government furnished drawings of the Cupola window
    frame design.

    65. **Handrail and Worksite Interface Socket Accommodations**

OPD The Contractor shall provide hardware, documentation and
certification for on-ground installation of US Lab EVA handrails and
Worksite Interface (WIF) sockets originally planned for on-orbit
installation.

66. **CBM System Level Testing of the JEM-PM and JEM ELM-PS CBM at MHI**

I&O The Contractor shall support active CBM electrical Acceptance
Testing on the JEM. This includes transportation and maintenance test
equipment.

67. **Addition and Installation of GFE Hardware**

DDT&E The Contractor shall install Government Furnished Equipment
provisions for Extravehicular Mobility Unit umbilical stowage and
Inter-Module Ventilation duct restraint.

68. **EVA Fit Check Test**

I&O The contractor shall prepare test procedures, conduct test readiness
reviews, monitor Government fit checks, and document results for EVA Fit
Checks.

69. **USL Jumper Kits for System Racks**

OPD a. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and deliver USL
Utility Jumper Kit suitable for on-orbit IVA installation and removal
which allows the identified USL System Racks to be fully rotated in the
USL without disconnection of the utility interface connections.

b\. The USL Utility Jumper Kit shall contain jumpers for the following
USL racks and rack utilities:

LAF1, Avionics #2

> J1 120 VDC power
>
> J42 Video

# J38 Video

> QP01 TCS Return
>
> LAF2, Avionics #3
>
> J20 Remote Sensing
>
> J40 Audio Bus B
>
> QP01 TCS Supply
>
> QP02 TCS Return
>
> LAP3, DDCU #1
>
> J50 Output Power DDCU #2
>
> J3 1553 DDCU #1
>
> LAF4, CHeCS #1
>
> J1 120 VDC power
>
> LAP5 MSS/Avionics #2
>
> J2 Local User Bus A
>
> LAF5, Avionics #1
>
> TCS Return
>
> LAF6, ARS
>
> THC Prc Air Return
>
> LTCS Supply
>
> LTCS Return
>
> MTCS Supply
>
> MTCS Return
>
> LAS6, MTTCS
>
> Gaseous N2
>
> Waste Water
>
> J3 1553
>
> J4 1553
>
> LAP6, LTTCS
>
> J1, Power
>
> J3, 1553
>
> J4, 1553
>
> Gaseous N2

**1.3.76 Life Test, Window Shutter Gearbox Assembly**

I&O The Contractor shall in accordance with the requirements of SSP
41172C, define a Window Shutter Gearbox Assembly Life Test Plan and
support NASA test activities.

77. **ITCS Cold Plate and Fluid Stability Test**

I&O The Contractor shall support the Government test program for long
term evaluation of ITCS hardware and fluid integrity.

78. **Modify External Cameras**

DDT&E The Contractor shall modify External Cameras to preclude lens
fogging by reworking seven camera lens assemblies.

79. **Site Activation and Post Delivery Checkout Activities**

I&O a) The Contractor shall perform site activation and post delivery
checkout testing of the Airlock element at KSC.

I&O b) The Contractor shall perform Hardware/Software Integration
testing for the Portable computer system (PSC) to Airlock Command and
Telemetry at KSC SSPF.

80. **EPS Power Channel Confidence Test**

I&O The Contractor shall conduct a Phase 1 Flight DDCU-E confidence
test.

81. **Joint NASA/ESA C&DH Interface Test**

I&O The Contractor shall provide test plans, hardware, software, and
personnel to support C&DH Interface tests with ESA systems in Europe.

82. **Active Thermal Control System Radiator Can't Fail Processes**

**1.3.82.1 Plum Brook Operations**

I&O The Contractor shall implement provisions to protect the Active
Thermal Control Radiator system during testing at NASA Plum Brook
Facility. This includes operational procedures, handling equipment, test
equipment, and physical and foreign object debris protection.

83. **Lab Rack Closeout Change**

DDT&E The Contractor shall procure and install three Air Velocity
Closeouts to replace three Rack Volume Closeouts in Lab locations LAB
101, LAB 1S2 and LAB 1P1.

84. **On-Orbit Leak Detection and Repair**

I&O Provide support to the Government for development, coordination, and
IP negotiations of ISS leak detection and repair effort. Tasks include:

1)  Support leak detection and repair integration team through December
    2002

2)  Determine required development work to support a leak detection and
    repair capability into the ISS configuration.

    81. **Resolution of ASBSP Dropped Telemetry Frames When Packet
        Length Check Fails**

OPD The Contractor shall incorporate into the Command and Control
software R5 release, the solution developed for software PR 13895, and
perform the required testing to assure that the implemented solution is
satisfactory to resolve the problem. The Contractor shall develop the
requirements language and update the impacted requirements documents,
i.e., SRS and SW ICDs, for release.

DDT&E **1.3.86 P3/P4 Static Loads Test**

The Contractor shall perform P3/P4 Static Loads Test launch and abort
landing test cases to incorporate the load changes required to certify
the Pre Integrated Structure (PIT) and Photovoltaic Module (PVM)
structures to accept IEA battery and Flywheel Energy Storage Unit (FSU)
onloads and the PVR on the S6.

87. **EVA Pre-Breathe Protocol**

OPD The Contractor shall provide provisions to support an EVA two-hour
Pre-Breathe exercise Protocol.

**1.3.88 Node 2/3 Integrated Rack Structural Analysis**

I&O The Contractor shall provide the following to support Node 2/3
Avionics Integrated Rack structural analysis:

1\. Modal Test Plan

2.  Test article configuration/deconfiguration modifications

3.  Analysis of test data provided by the Government

4.  Reports of rack structure stress, fatigue, and fracture analysis for
    four Node 2 and two Node 3 racks

5.  VLA updates for Node 2 and Node 3 racks

6.  Support to technical panels, design reviews, and verification
    reviews

7.  Structural analysis report for knee braces

    89. **Lab Jumper Cables**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate and/or assemble,
verify and deliver hardware identified herein.

a\. USL Forward Secondary Power Distribution ((FSPD) Assembly: The USL
FSPD

> Assembly will connect the USL Aft Endcone SPDA (SPDA LAAFT-2B) to the
>
> USL Forward Endcone SPDA (LAFWD)-1B).

b.  USL Rack DDCU Jumper Cable (RDJC): The USL RDJC will allow one of
    the two USL Rack DDCUs to be configured to power all loads normally
    powered from that rack (this includes USL Loads and other element
    loads).

    89. **Human Factors Data for Alenia ORUs**

I&O The Contractor shall assist NASA in their efforts to provide human
factors engineering data to Alenia for the Node 2 and 3 ORUs that were
procured or developed by the contractor and delivered as GFE through
NASA.

90. **OTDR Fiber Optic Cable Test**

OPD The Contractor shall procure and certify Optical Time Domain
Reflectometers (OTDR) to support an on-orbit checkout test of the Node 1
fiber optic cables.

91. **Leak Test for the Plasma Contractor Unit**

DDT&E The Contractor shall perform a post-environment qualification
helium leak test on the Plasma Contractor Unit (PCU), at a maximum
operation pressure (3000 psig), in a vacuum environment.

92. **Thermal Cycle Acceptance Testing for the Solar Array Wing Locking
    Struts**

DDT&E The Contractor shall perform a thermal cycle acceptance test at
ambient pressure on locking struts for Solar Array Wing (SAW) end items
FW6, FW7, and FW8.

93. **ARIS Express Installation Maintenance Trainer Upgrade**

I&O a. The Contractor shall provide and install an ARIS Express
Installation Maintenance Trainer Modification Kit.

I&O b. The Contractor shall conduct a structural analysis of the ARIS
Express Installation maintenance Trainer rack boss structure.

94. **Fiber Optic Cable Screen Test**

OPD The Contractor shall perform screening test on fiber optic cable
received from International Partners or GFE providers.

95. **U. S. Lab Integrated Capability Test (ICT)**

I&O The Contractor shall develop test procedures and detailed test
plans, and conduct ICT test to implement ACOMC test requirements
baselined by the T&V Control Panel.

**1.3.97 USL ARS Power Jumper**

I&O The Contractor shall design, develop, verify, and deliver an IVA
power jumper between connector reference designator P1LAS1 at J1
location on the interface panel of the ARS rack and connector reference
designator J1LAF6 located in the forward endcone of the USL and
identified as W3301P3.

98. **Internal Thermal Control System Sampling Tool**

> OPD The Contractor shall:

a.  Conduct a thermal/hydraulic analysis of the Internal Thermal Control
    System (ITCS) to document impacts of the ITCS Coolant Sampling Tool
    Kit on the USL system performance.

b.  Deliver the ITCS Coolant Sampling Tools and a USL ITCS Coolant
    Sampling Tool Mod Kit.

c.  Prepare procedures for on-orbit operation and crew training for use
    of the ITCS Sampling Tool Kit for USL.

    98. **Universal Trunnion Attachment System Passive Sub-Assembly
        Trunnion Pin Mod**

> **Kits**

OPD The Contractor shall develop, fabricate, qualify, and deliver
Passive Universal Trunnion Attachment System (UTAS) plugs, as follows:

Four ISS Flight Element Z1 (UTAS) plugs as a Mod Kit,

Three ISS Flight Elements P6 (UTAS) plugs as a Mod Kit

**1.3.100 Enumerate Video Primitives**

I&O The Contractor shall modify the Command and Control software to
enumerate source and destination primitives for video routing and
deroute commands.

101. **S0/Node 3 Cable Harness Assemblies**

> OPD The Contractor shall provide power provisions for Node 3 utilizing
> a fixed harness segment on S0 and
>
> EVA installable segment launched separately. Two (2) of the wire
> harnesses shall be integrated within the
>
> S0 truss element from each of the two MBSUs to the S0 Node 3 utility
> tray interface panel. The other two
>
> wire harness assemblies will be attached (lay over) to the exterior of
> the S0/Node 3 utility tray. Also
>
> included is the redesign modification harness assemblies per DIL item
> No. 100788.

102. **Bus Over-Voltage Protection in Direct Current Switching Unit
     Firmware**

> OPD The Contractor shall:

1.  Develop and deliver modified Switchgear Controller Assembly (SCA)
    firmware in the DCSU to provide for over voltage protection of the
    primary power bus.

2.  Perform Bench level and SPEL testing to demonstrate the SCA firmware
    modification.

3.  Modify, validate and release test support equipment Direct Current
    Switching Unit (DSCU) OTA and SCA CTA Software.

    101. **S0 UHF Termination Cables**

DDT&E The Contractor shall provide three terminated "jumper" cables for
use between USL connectors J49 and

> P1. The "Jumper Cables" will provide SSSR protection for UHF system by
> closing open circuits for
>
> interim configurations.

102. **Manual Flow Control Valve Repeatability Testing**

> I&O The Contractor shall perform Internal Thermal Control System
> (ITCS) Manual Flow Control Valve (MFCV)
>
> performance repeatability testing.

103. **MELFI Testing at ISIL**

> I&O The Contractor shall perform tests on the MELFI Electronics Unit
> in the ISIL.

104. **MPLM Air Flow Analysis**

> I&O The Contractor shall perform analysis and impact assessment of the
> airflow in the MPLM as it relates volumetric envelope of the Resupply
> Stowage Platform(s) installed.

105. **On Orbit Fiber Optics Repair**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall provide logistic analysis (DR OP04) for
Flight 2A through 7A repair of USOS Fiber Optic (FO) cables.

b.  The Contractor shall provide support equipment for testing,
    maintenance, and repair of Fos in accordance with SSP 50603 (FO test
    OSE specifications) and SSP 50546.

> c\. The Contractor shall develop Flight 2A through 7A USOS on-orbit
> ISS FO schematics.
>
> d\. The Contractor shall provide FO repair kit containing 36 FO
> terminated links, EVA PDGF contingency cable, and FO interference
> cleaning material.

101. **Node 2 Service and Performance Checkout Unit (SPCU) Heat Exchange
     (HX ATP)**

> DDT&E The Contractor shall retest the Node 2 Service and Performance
> Checkout Unit (SPCU) Heat Exchanger to higher pressure proof and leak
> test levels. Re-identify as new configuration, and acceptable for
> Airlock use.

102. **International Partner Contamination Analysis**

> I&O The contractor shall support the Government by providing
> contamination environment analysis for IP ISS
>
> verification requirements and issue resolution.

103. **MT/MBS Analyses and Tests**

I&O The Contractor shall provide analyses and testing of the integrated
Canadian Space Agency (CSA) Space Station Remote Manipulator System
(SSRMS) Mobile Remote Servicer Base System (MBS) and Mobile Transporter
(MT).

104. **Plasma Contractor Unit Firmware Upgrade**

OPD The Contractor shall provide updated Spare Plasma Contractor Unit
(PCU) Firmware to reduce time to availability to support of revised PCU
operational plan for nominal and contingency operations.

105. **Floating Potential Probe (FPP)**

> OPD The Contractor shall integrate the Government-supplied FPP into
> the ISS.

106. **Maintain Early Portable Computer System Capability**

> I&O The Contractor shall maintain the Early Portable Computer System
> capability.

107. **MDM Obsolete Component Procedure -- Hybrid Die**

SPARES The Contractor shall procure Flight Prototype, and Flight
Equivalent Unit MDM Hybrid Die parts.

108. **CHeCS Rack Warning Label Kit Development**

OPD The Contractor shall develop and install a CHeCS Rack modification
kit containing a warning label and instructions for the Defibrillator
power connection.

109. **Early Active Thermal Control System Life Test**

> I&O The Contractor shall support EATCS life testing by providing
> periodic analysis of fluid samples.

110. **Hall Generator Assembly Redesign and Deployment**

OPD The Contractor shall develop, qualify, and deliver mod kits for
CMG's having Hall Generator Rings redesigned to reduce temperature
sensitivity.

111. **Fabrication of Airlock ATU/EACP Y-Cables**

OPD The Contractor shall deliver a new Airlock Audio Cable W with low
profile connectors to replace the current Airlock Audio Cable W "high
profile" connectors. This cable will serve as a link between the

Extravehicular Mobility Unit Audio Control Panel (EACP) and the
International Space Station (ISS)

Airlock Audio Terminal Unit (ATU) system for hard-line communications
during pre- and post-

Extravehicular Activity (EVA) operations.

112. **Female Quick Disconnect (QD) Valve Defeat Inspection Tools**

OPD The Contractor shall fabricate female QD valve defeat inspection
tools or shop aids to be used for

inspection of female QD spool and stop plug seals.

113. **Develop Type 9 ESS MDMs**

OPD The Contractor shall modify the ESS MDMs (-916 only) to install
solid state mass memory.

**1.3.121 EVA MSS Contingency Cable Kit**

OPD The Contractor shall design, test and deliver an EVA installed power
cord to supply keep-alive power to the MSS system. The power source
shall be a locally accessible MSS utility power port.

**1.3.122 Add Filter to Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly**

OPD The Contractor shall design, test and deliver a Carbon Dioxide
Removal Assembly (CDRA) Filter Installation kits to prevent foreign
object debris (FOD) from entering the CDRA vacuum vent line and pump
inlet.

**1.3.123 EPS ORU Firmware Updates**

I&O The Contractor shall develop the capability for on-orbit download
and update of firmware for Electrical Power System (EPS) Orbital
Replaceable Units (ORUs).

**1.3.124 Avionics and Hardware Systems Integration, Simulations and
Mission Support**

I&O The Contractor shall perform the following tasks:

1\. Contractor shall provide support for the closeout of tasks and
documentation developed under the previous effort for defining
requirements and design of a high fidelity integrated test environment.
(ASIL CLOSEOUT)

2\. The Contractor shall participate with NASA/COD in the performance of
tasks and meetings to support generation of facility requirements, floor
layouts, and general capabilities descriptions. (FACILITY)

3\. The Contractor shall develop equipment list(s) and identify
additional hardware allocations necessary to augment existing
consolidated laboratories support to ISS flight software integration and
initiate processes to acquire identified hardware. (EQUIPMENT)

4\. The Contractor shall investigate, define options, provide
recommendations, and develop necessary hardware and software to augment
the test support capabilities of existing simulations. (SIMS)

5\. The Contractor shall identify user requirements for test data
capture and post-test data analysis tools. The Contractor shall procure,
install and integrate the hardware and software for these tools into the
ISIL. (TCSC)

**1.3.125 MSS Acceptance Test Activities**

I&O The Contractor Shall Provide Engineering Technical Expertise and
analysis for the MSS Acceptance Test Program.

**1.3.126 MSS Qualification Activities**

I&O The Contractor shall provide engineering technical expertise and
analysis for the MSS Qualification Test Program.

**1.3.127 Develop and Qualify New Design Capacitor**

OPD The Contractor shall develop and qualify a new capacitor for use in
DDCUs.

**1.3.128 Develop ITCS Repair Kits**

OPD The Contractor shall develop and deliver three ITCS insulation
repair kits. Two will be provided for training and one for use in
on-orbit repair of ITCS insulation.

**1.3.129 Avionics and Hardware Systems Integration, Simulations and
Mission Support**

I&O a. The Contractor shall provide and checkout hardware/software
necessary to modify the existing ISS Systems Integration Laboratory
(ISIL) Integration Test Rig (ITR). Modification of the ITR core systems
shall be compatible with government modifications to the Sonny Carter
Training Facility (SCTF) and will include expansion of the ISIL control
room, accommodation of additional avionics hardware, firmware
controllers, additional Special Purpose Test Equipment (SPTE),
additional laboratory electrical interfaces (power lab), and
modifications to the Software Integration Platform (SIP) rig.

b\. The Contractor shall provide and checkout the hardware/software
necessary to improve simulation and Input/Output capabilities in the
ISIL/ITR.

c\. The Contractor shall identify and recommend options for providing
additional assets to improve the fidelity of the ISIL/ITR laboratory.

d\. The Contractor shall support the concurrent activities of SCTF
modifications, laboratory systems upgrades, and flight hardware/software
development, verification, and mission modification.

**1.3.130 Avionics Laboratory Hardware Procurement**

OPD a. The Contractor shall develop and provide Flight Computer
Hardware, necessary to outfit and to operate within a laboratory
environment. This equipment shall be built to Prototype Commercial MDMs,
wherein the design is for flight hardware, but using commercial grade
parts and workmanship practices.

OPD b. The Contractor shall deliver an MDM I/O Platform (MIOP) GSE for
providing an I/O signal interface between Real Time I/O Processors
(RTIOPs) and Prototype MDMs in accordance with SSP 50004.

**1.3.131 Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter Function**

OPD a. The Contractor shall remove the Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter
(GFCI) function from the Utility Outlet Panel (UOP).

b\. The Contractor shall retain the same output power connector body,
pinout, and keying configuration for the UOPs with and without the GFCI.

**1.3.132 New SSQ 22680 Connector Inserts**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, test and flight
certify two (2) new SSQ 22680 connector insert pairs (plug and
receptacles) and perform engineering evaluation testing on one existing
connector/insert pair (plug and receptacle.)

**1.3.133 Design and Fabricate P1 TRRJ Thermostat Box Thermal Blankets**

OPD The Contractor shall deliver to the Government for Flight 11A,
Thermal Blanket installation kits that will insulate the P1 TRRJ
Thermostat Boxes to provide for extended periods of power loss to the
box heaters without exceeding their minimum required temperature limit.

**1.3.134 GSE and Tech Support to Node 2**

OPD A. The Contractor shall provide technical support and biocide to
Alenia Spazio in Torino, Italy for use in cleaning the Interface Test
Kit and the ITCS Cooling Servicer prior to hookup to flight hardware.

OPD B. The Contractor shall provide support equipment (FE 1445P Heat
Exchanger Simulator, Chromalux Heaters and connection hardware) and
technical expertise for Node 2 Internal Thermal Control System (ITCS)
testing during Hardware/Software Integration (HIS) testing at Alenia.

135. **Recharge Oxygen Orifice Bypass/Replacement Kit**

OPD The Contractor shall deliver to the Government a Recharge Oxygen
Orifice Bypass/Replacement Mod Kit for installation in the Airlock.

136. **MT/CETA Rail Temporary Stops**

**I**&O The Contractor shall provide technical, engineering, and safety
analysis in support of the NASA design and certification of EVA
installable MT/CETA Rail Temporary Stops for ITS P3/PVM P4 and the ITS
S3/PVM S4.

137. **New UF-2 Jumper Cable**

OPD a) The Contractor shall deliver a MBS/MT Cross Wire Jumper Cable Kit
that will distribute DC power between the MBS and a MT cable connector
plug to support simultaneous and independent UMA operations**.**

OPD b) The Contractor shall perform an analysis of the effectiveness of
the MT/MBS interface Mod Kit and make the data available to the
Government.

138. **Perform Node 1 Common ORU Tolerance Analysis for Common
     Hardware**

OPD The Contractor shall perform a tolerance analysis to demonstrate
that Node 2 Orbital Replacement Units (ORUs) can be changed out for
maintenance or replacement on-orbit.

3.  **UTILIZATION (WBS 1.4) -- Through FY02**

I&O The Contractor shall provide technical and program analyses and data
in support of integrating and implementing the Utilization processes
into all phases of the ISS Program. The Contractor shall perform:

I&O a) Utilization Analysis and Integration

I&O b) Research Accommodations Assessments and Coordination

I&O c) Facility Payload Design Evaluation and Hardware Tracking

I&O d) Payload Software Integration & Verification

I&O e) Payload Engineering Integration

I&O as specified in the following sections, for the payloads specified
in Section J-21, US Rack and Truss Level Payloads for ISS.

1.  **UTILIZATION ANALYSIS & INTEGRATION (WBS 1.4.1) -- Through FY02**

**1.4.1.1 Integration -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) perform Utilization analysis and integration to ensure that
Utilization products and issues are

coordinated;

I&O (2) establish a forum for coordinating Utilization issues and
assigning them to the appropriate team(s) for resolution

I&O (3) provide schedule, cost, and technical status at monthly
performance review meetings;

I&O (4) evaluate program change packages and identify impacts to payload
requirements or design, and impacts to Utilization teams.

I&O (5) develop and maintain a Utilization Team Execution Plan (TEP);

I&O (6) provide DR UT50, Documentation, Customer Analytical Integration
Capability, at completion of contract.

**1.4.1.2 Analysis -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) perform trades and analyses to resolve issues that affect
multiple Utilization teams;

I&O (2) develop and implement a waivers/exception/deviation process for
payloads,

I&O (3) lead the effort to evaluate, coordinate and provide
approval/disapproval recommendations for NASA closure of the proposed
payload interface exceptions and issues for integrated racks and truss
payloads in US Elements and US integrated racks in IP Elements.
Evaluate, coordinate and provide approval/disapproval recommendations
for NASA closure of the proposed payload verification exceptions and
issues.

I&O (4) perform a study (including review of existing ISS verification
capabilities) to determine the types of tools (including quantity and
fidelity) required to ensure payload interface compatibility with ISS
systems.

**1.4.1.3 Safety -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) review and analyze the Payload Safety Data Packages (PSDPs) to
ensure adequate payload hazard identification and controls. The
contractor shall participate in the Payload review and analyze the
Payload Safety Data Packages (PSDPs) to ensure adequate payload hazard
identification and controls. The contractor shall participate in the
Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP). The contractor shall respond to
Utilization Team actions from the PSRP;

I&O (2) coordinate with the ISS Safety Review Panel and the PSRP. This
coordination shall consist of reporting on the effects of payload
designs on ISS system hazards and the integrated

> system/payload safety; reviewing SRP rulings/decisions for use in PSRP
> processing and integration of PSRP direction across payloads and
> payload complements.

I&O (3) develop recommended updates to NSTS 1700.7B Addendum as
required;

I&O (4) develop recommended PSRP interpretation letters as required;

I&O (5) evaluate and provide approval/disapproval recommendations to
payload safety noncompliance reports.

**1.4.1.4 Program Reviews -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) be responsible for planning, coordinating, and developing the
UAI, RA, PEI, PSIV, FP, and payload safety products to support Program
reviews (stage integration reviews, cargo compatibility reviews, cargo
integration reviews, flight safety reviews, flight readiness reviews).
This includes identification and collection of data products required
from Payload Developers to support these reviews.

I&O (2) be responsible for resolving Utilization issues that are
identified at these reviews.

I&O (3) develop inputs and be accountable for the PEI, PSIV, and payload
safety sections of the Certificate of Flight Readiness (COFR).

**1.4.2 RESEARCH ACCOMMODATIONS (WBS 1.4.2) -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) Review the ISS System requirements as defined in SSP 41000, the
design implementation, and the desired Utilization capabilities as
stated in the Concept of Operations and Utilization Document, SSP
50011-01, to identify and resolve discrepancies.

I&O (2) Assess the suitability of the ISS design and flight article to
meet payload science requirements. The Contractor shall resolve
Utilization issues with the ISS design (all proposed ISS modifications
resulting from this activity shall be authorized by a separate change).

I&O (3) Attend and provide inputs to panel assessments and periodic
independent reviews for research accommodations, vehicle provided
resources and design development.

I&O (4) Deleted.

I&O (5) Assess the impact to Utilization of proposed changes to the
Space Station Vehicle and flight systems. For the Russian Segment, this
task shall be limited to information provided to the ISS Program from
RSA.

I&O (6) Provide research accommodations data and drawings to payload
developers upon request.

I&O (7) Develop and maintain DR RA01, ISS Payload Interface Fault
Tolerance Document (including capability during stage builds) that can
be used by payload developers in controlling hazards (this includes the
Partner modules).

I&O (8) Develop integrated functional drawings/schematics for each
payload service, accommodation and interface.

I&O (9) Develop Payload Interface Requirements and ICD Templates

I&O (a) Develop and maintain, via the changes clause, DR PA06,
Pressurized Payloads

Interface Requirements Document.

I&O (b) Develop and maintain, via the changes clause, DR PA07,
Pressurized Payloads

Hardware Interface Control Document Template

I&O (c) Develop and maintain, via the changes clause, DR PA08,
Pressurized Payloads

Software Interface Control Document Template, SSP 57002.

I&O (d) Develop and maintain, via the changes clause, DR PA09, Attached
Payload Interface

Requirements Document

I&O (e) Develop and maintain, via the changes clause, DR PA10, Attached
Payloads Hardware

Interface Control Document Template

I&O (f) Develop and maintain the Pressurized Payloads Accommodations
Handbook, DR PA11,

and the Attached Payloads Accommodations Handbook, DR PA12.

I&O (g) The contractor shall develop and maintain DR PA04 Payload Flight
Equipment

Requirements and Guidelines for Safety Critical Structures to define the
process,

procedures, schedules, and requirements associated with structural
verification of

payloads. This includes re-certification process of ISPRs for multiple
launches/landings.

I&O (h) The contractor shall review and provide inputs to:

I&O 1) EXPRESS Rack and Pallet IDDs, EXPRESS Rack and Pallet Generic

Verification Plans, and EIA Blankbooks, and;

I&O 2) MSG and LSG to User IDDs and Generic Verification Plans.

I&O (10) Develop a Payload MDM Users Manual in accordance with DR RA02.

**1.4.3 FACILITY PAYLOAD DESIGN EVALUATION & HARDWARE TRACKING (WBS
1.4.3) -- Through FY02 except for paragraphs 19 and 21.a and b which are
still in effect.**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) attend design reviews and/or review the data packages for US
payload (US rack, Exposed Facility, or truss level payloads intended to
operate in the US Lab or on the Truss) to ensure payload design is
conforming to ISS interface requirements and constraints.

I&O (2) coordinate, the delivery of vehicle provided hardware (ARIS,
SPOE, ISPRs, rack barriers, and other payload equipment provided by the
contractor) for the NASA Payloads Office

I&O (3) ensure associated products (models, documentation, drawings,
hazard reports) are made available to payload providers, using
contractor provided payload hardware.

I&O (4) perform integrated US payload rack stress, dynamic, preliminary
coupled loads analysis for NASA ISPRs with significant negative margins
of safety, and structural analyses and provide safety flight
certification for the integrated ISPR structure. The contractor shall
evaluate NASDA integrated payload rack stress, dynamic, and structural
analyses for the MELFI, MSG, and the LSG ISPRs and perform preliminary
coupled loads analysis for ISPRs with significant negative margins of
safety. The Contractor shall document the results of these analyses in
DR FP02, Integrated Payload Rack Structural Analysis Reports.

I&O (5) develop rack structure design enveloping parameters. The
Contractor shall document the results of this analysis in DR FP04, ISPR
Structural Integrators Handbook.

I&O (6) develop and implement a process to provide status for hardware
used by payloads which was originally developed and certified by the
contractor or the Product Groups. The Contractor shall maintain this
status in informal Facility Payloads Hardware Tracking Reports.

I&O (7) develop DR FP04, ISPR Structural Integrator's Handbook.

I&O (8) develop DR FP05, ARIS User's Handbook.

I&O (9) develop DR FP06, ARIS to Payload ICD.

I&O 10) The contractor shall perform a structural systems integration
function consisting of

I&O a) configuration control of the ISPR models,

I&O b) oversight of Payload developer modifications to the ISPRs,

I&O c) inspection of the ISPRs before and after flight,

I&O d) coordination and participation with the payload developers in
integrated payload rack structures TIMS and safety meetings,

I&O e) development, documentation, and approval of the overall process
associated with structural integration,

I&O f) coordinate with integrated Payload Rack Developers to help ensure
ISS Payload Flight Equipment requirements and Guidelines for Safety
Critical requirements are properly implemented.

I&O 11) The contractor shall perform analyses and safety certification
that proposed payload

vacuum exhaust gasses are compatible with the vacuum systems and the
external

hardware.

I&O 12) The contractor shall provide ARIS integration support to
integrated payload rack developers. This includes physical integration
of ARIS components, electrical, software, calibration, set-up, and
activation support, and troubleshooting ARIS problems on-orbit with
ground support.

I&O 13) Provide the USL Kneebrace Bolt Action Replacement (KBAR) kits.
Perform and provide, in Contractor format to the Government via
contracts letter, a structural analysis to determine if the structural
capacity meets or exceeds the load, strength and fatigue requirements.
Develop replacement upper attachment points to the Rack Volume Closeout.
Install KBAR kit components into the USL at KSC, to include ARIS
Standoff Links, ARIS Pivots, and Rack Volume Closeout with upper
attachment replacement.

I&O 13a) The contractor shall rework 48 sets of Knee Brace Rod Ends
dedicated for the MPLM to the design implementation details contained in
PIRN 41017-ND-0006A.

OPD 13b) Provide a Flight KBAR Adapter Kit for Node 1, a Training KBAR
Adapter for use at KSC, Building 9, a stress analysis for structural
capacity of the Node 1 Standoff Link, and deliver kits to KSC for flight
7A.1.

I&O 14) Develop, document, and deliver ARIS/EXPRESS Installation &
Maintenance Trainer Specification in accordance with DRD FP07

I&O 15) Design, develop, manufacture, assemble, verify, evaluate, and
deliver the ARIS/EXPRESS Installation & Maintenance Trainer in
accordance with S684-10439

I&O 16) Install labels, in accordance with the Government furnished ARIS
label installation instructions, on loose ARIS parts and update the ARIS
documentation to reflect the labeling installation.

I&O 17) Develop and provide the ARIS ISS Characterization Equipment
(ICE) in accordance with DR FP10. Develop ARIS ICE Test Plan (DR FP12).
Provide analysis results of on-orbit performance of the experiment for
the period between Flights 6A and 7in accordance with DR FP11 ARIS ICE
Final Report.

I&O 18) Design, develop, manufacture, assemble, verify, and deliver
Payload Crew Aids Kit in accordance with DR FP08.

I&O 19) For the Passive Rack Isolation System the contractor shall:

a)  Develop passive Rack Isolation System (PaRIS) specification in
    accordance with Data Requirements Description (DRD) FP09.

b)  Design, develop, manufacture, assemble, verify, test and deliver to
    the Government PaRIS flight unit(s), a PaRIS Spares Kit, in
    accordance with the Passive Rack Isolation System Specification.

c)  Provide effort to ship and install PaRIS developmental hardware into
    a JSC Building and Training Rack, and provide operational
    information to training organization.

I&O 20) Develop and deliver the ICE Electrical Power Label Mod Kit.

I&O 21) ARIS Modifications for Unique Interfaces

a)  The Contractor shall develop and deliver to the Government: Active
    Rack Isolation System (ARIS) kits in unique configurations for the
    Fluid Combustion Facility (FCF) and Materials Science Research Rack
    (MSRR).

b)  The Contractor shall develop and deliver to the Government:
    Modification Kits for a high emissivity surface finish material for
    the ARIS REUs used in the EXPRESS racks and for the on-orbit spare
    REU.

c)  The Contractor shall integrate the ARIS FCF and MSRR Modification
    Kits into the facility payloads during the facility processing
    schedule.

d)  The Contractor shall perform thermal, structural, and microgravity
    performance analysis for ARIS racks that weigh between 2200 and 2400
    pounds, and make the data available to the Government in contractor
    format.

e)  The Contractor shall perform a thermal analysis of ARIS equipment
    that is in a rack without airflow, and make a report of the results
    in contractor format available to the Government.

**1.4.3.1 Mil-Std-1553B Remote Terminal (RT) Testing on Payload Remote
Terminals -- Through FY02**

I&O For Mil-Std-1553B Remote Terminal (RT) Testing on Payload Rack
Remote Terminals, the Contractor shall:

I&O a. Develop test plans and procedures for the interface testing.

I&O b. Conduct the RT testing for up to 10 Payload Racks (8 in the
U.S.A, 1 in Germany, and 1 in France) at the rack to module interface.

I&O c. Provide a test report to the Government, where the report
includes the test data and analysis results necessary for Payload Rack
RT interface requirements compliance, in Contractor format, via
contracts letter, within 60 days of completion of each Payload RT test.

2.  **Longeron Fittings for Window Observational Research Facility
    (WORF) Rack -- Through FY02**

I&O a. The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate, and provide a
WORF attachment modification

kit, for the attachment of the WORF On-Orbit to the USL Nadir Window
longeron

(position LABD3).

I&O b. The Contractor shall install the WORF attachment modification kit
into the USL.

3.  **U.S. Lab Nadir Window Pre-Flight Testing -- Through FY02**

I&O The Contractor shall perform activities necessary to support
University of Arizona pre-flight testing of the U.S. Lab Nadir Window.

4.  **Space Station IVA Analysis System Support -- Through FY02**

I&O a. The Contractor shall provide support for the development of 3-D
models of the interior of the Space Station, and for analyses for
Increment 1 (Expedition 1).

I&O b. The Contractor shall provide 3-D modeling for the Flight Crew
System, rack integration, and integration for ISS. The Contractor shall
incorporate GFE and CheCS 3D models into the Station IVA Analysis
System.

5.  **Support engineering Tasks for Payload Support equipment, Post
    DD250 -- Through FY02**

I&O For the following payload support hardware Active Rack Isolation
System/ARIS Express Installation and Maintenance Trainer (ARIS/AEIMT),
Passive Rack Isolation System (PaRIS), Payload Rack Checkout Unit
(PRCU), Suitcase Test Environment for Payloads, (STEP), Payload Software
Integration Verification Facility (PSIVF, and Non-Complex Payload System
Support Development (PSSD) Hardware, the Contractor shall:

a.  Perform the overall integration of the tasks necessary to provide
    post delivery engineering support to include development and
    implementation of DR FP 43, Payload Support Engineering Plan.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
b.  Provide anomaly resolution and maintenance of anomaly analysis
    models, tools, and test equipment to include identifying repair
    processes, part, and required test, releasing drawings and
    procedures, and assisting PPS in implementing repairs.

c.  Provide software maintenance, updates, associated documentation
    releases, and regression testing to include updates and required by
    revisions to PEP; review of operation and test data to identify
    software anomalies; development, test, and documentation of updated
    code in VDD; writing and testing procedures to install updated
    software; and assisting PPS in installation and testing on the
    system.

d.  Provide engineering support to PPS for maintenance planning, repair
    vendor qualification, and design or substitution of
    obsolete/unobtainable parts needed for maintenance and repair
    equipment to include updating documentation, drawings, and
    procedures.

OPD **1.4.3.6 ARIS and WORF Hardware for JEM and APM -- Through FY02**

a.  The Contractor shall deliver ARIS and WORF hardware.

b.  The Contractor shall deliver a pivot compatible with an adjacent
    ARIS rack that will accommodate either a Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
    (MHI) or an IHI rack.

c.  The Contractor shall deliver to the Government: lower rack
    restraints compatible with a WORF rack.

I&O **1.4.4 PAYLOAD SOFTWARE INTEGRATION AND VERIFICATION (PSIV) --
Through FY02**

I&O **1.4.4.1 PSIV Definition -- Through FY02**

**1.4.4.1.1 Payload Software Requirements Accommodation Analysis --
Through FY02**

I&O The contractor shall perform analysis for accommodating the payload
software requirements and develop and document ISS software systems and
payload interface requirements, per Payload Flight Applications Software
Design and Verification Requirements Document, DR UT32. In addition,
configuration and documentation updates shall be provided.

**1.4.4.1.2 Complement PSIV -- Through FY02**

I&O The contractor shall perform payload software integration and
verification for the payload complement for each stage. This process
includes:

I&O a. Management and support of payload developed software integration/
verification with the payload developer.

I&O b. Development, integration, verification and maintenance of PCS
payload unique and complement software and display files, PES data
tables, PES software and payload developed software resident in ISS
provided processors required to support payload execution.

I&O c. Support verification of payload developed software interfaces to
ISS.

I&O d. Perform verification of stage configuration of payload software.

I&O e. Support on-orbit payload software reconfiguration and anomaly
resolution.

**1.4.4.1.3 Complement Software Test and Mission Builds -- Through
FY02**

I&O The contractor shall develop complement test
plans/procedures/reports for payload software and maintain this data in
test folders. The contractor shall deliver verified and certified
payload software for horizontal ISS testing and mission builds and
develop the Software Version Description Drawing (VDD), Software Data
Item Package, DR UT39. The contractor shall develop, maintain, and
implement Payload complement flight PSIV software development and
documentation in accordance the PSIV System Development Plan, DR UT30.

**1.4.4.1.4 Complement Software Verification Assessment -- Through
FY02**

I&O The contractor shall perform integrated payload complement
assessments for payload flight software. These assessments shall be used
to support the increment payload complement verification.

**1.4.4.1.5 Payload Integration and Verification Capability (PIVC)
Definition -- Through FY02**

I&O The contractor shall define, design, develop, deliver, maintain and
support a Payload Integration and Verification Capability (PIVC)
consisting of three components:

\(1\) Payload Software Integration and Verification Facility (PSIVF);

\(2\) Suitcase Test Environment for Payloads (STEP); and

\(3\) Payload Rack Checkout Unit (PRCU).

I&O The requirements of each component shall be defined in DR UT34, DR
UT35, and DR UT33. The contractor shall update the PSIV End Item
requirements traceability in accordance with DR PA06 and propose
upgrades, if necessary, to meet the new requirements.

I&O The contractor shall provide configuration management and sustaining
engineering for all PIVC components to ensure they accurately emulate
on-orbit vehicle interfaces and systems. Program change packages shall
be evaluated and impacts to PIVC components shall be identified. Update
changes to baseline PIVC end-items will be performed by the engineering
change process.

I&O a. PSIVF Requirements:

> 1\. The PSIVF shall contain a development environment, verification
> environment, STEP baseline engineering unit and PRCU.
>
> 2\. The PSIVF development environment shall include a set of
> computational equipment used to develop the verification environment
> and payload support data (displays, tables, configuration files, etc.)
> and maintain all payload support software.
>
> 3\. The PSIVF test environment shall emulate the on-board C&DH payload
> network to provide for payload software integration.
>
> 4\. The contractor shall develop and maintain, with the assistance of
> the interfacing teams, PSIV/F IDD/ICD, DR UT31 to document the PSIVF
> to external systems interface definitions and control.
>
> 5\. The PSIVF shall be dispositioned as a residual asset upon
> expiration of this contract.
>
> 6\. The PSIVF shall provide a POIC/PDSS command/command response,
> telemetry interface, including a standard PIMS file transport/export
> file transfer to/from the payload MDM FEU.

I&O b. STEP and PRCU Requirements:

> 1\. The STEP shall be developed for use at the Payload Experiment
> Developer (PED) site for initial payload software
> development/integration, and at KSC for final hardware/ software
> integration.
>
> 2\. The PRCU shall be developed for use at the PED site for
> distributed integration and verification test of the payload rack to
> station interfaces. The contractor shall deliver, assemble, checkout,
> and DD250 the PRCUs at the developers site.
>
> 3\. The PRCU shall include generic test scripts for use by Payload
> Developers in meeting payload hardware and software verification test
> requirements contained in the Payload IRD and Unique Verification
> Plan.
>
> 4\. Installation of Payload Rack Checkout Unit Number 6 at Marshall
> Space Flight Center

a.  The Contractor shall perform an analysis to determine the unique
    Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) microgravity facility
    requirements for the PRCU installation.

> b\. Install a modified PRCU #6 in Government provided facilities at
> MSFC.

c.  An engineering unit of the STEP and PRCU shall be maintained to
    support sustaining engineering of the delivered STEPs and PRCUs.

> 5\. The Contractor shall define, develop and provide engineering
> documentation defining the disassembly, packaging, and shipping
> requirements for the PECU.

**1.4.4.2 Payload Integration and Verification Capability (PIVC)
Development**

**(PSIVF, STEP and PRCU) -- Through FY02**

I&O a. The contractor shall produce, deliver, and maintain Verification
Test Requirements Traceabilty, DR UT36, and Verification Test
Procedures, DR UT37 for each PIVC hardware and software Contract End
Item (CEI).

I&O b. The contractor shall produce, deliver, and maintain Verification
Test Reports, DR UT38 for each PIVC hardware and software CEI.

I&O c. The contractor shall produce and deliver an Acceptance Data
Package (ADP), DR PC08 for delivery with ship-less units and the
unit/facility utilized in the final acceptance test/final First Article
Inspection (FAI - reference 1.1.4.2.5 below). ADPs will be provided to
support delivery of subsequent units upon completion of acceptance
testing prior to shipment of each subsequent unit. Partial
verification/acceptance testing and FAI will be accomplished to the
extent possible on ship-less end-items and the PSIVF Initial Operating
Capability. Ship-less configurations are defined as planned deliveries
of STEP or PRCU CEIs that do not satisfy all the applicable CIDS/PIDS
functional requirements. Final verification/ acceptance testing and FAI
shall be accomplished in Huntsville on a complete unit manufactured
subsequent to the delivery of ship-less unit(s).

I&O d. The contractor shall produce, deliver, and maintain a Software
Version Description Document (VDD), Software and Data Item Package, DR
UT39 to support each software CEI delivery.

I&O e. The contractor shall produce, deliver, and maintain a User's
Guide, DR UT41, and a Maintenance Plan, DR UT42 for a given unique PIVC
CEI.

I&O f. Quality Assurance for PIVC hardware end-items will be in
accordance with D683-35225-1, Payload Science & Utilization Safety and
Mission Assurance Plan, which tailors NHB5300.4(1B) to provide effective
control of commercial off-the-shelf material. Quality Assurance for PIVC
software end-items will be in accordance with MSFC CQ5330.1A, Software
Quality Assurance Requirements for MSFC Projects. The Contractor is
exempt from delivering Software Development Folders as defined in MSFC
CQ 5330.1A for the PRCU.

**1.4.4.2.1 Drawings -- Through FY02**

I&O All PSIV (WBS 1.4.4) hardware Drawings shall be in accordance with
DR UT40.

**1.4.4.2.2 Utilization Support and Operations & Maintenance (O&M) --
Through FY02**

I&O The contractor shall provide technical support to PEDs in the use of
STEP and PRCU for payload development and verification testing. The
contractor shall procure and provide inventory management of spare parts
for only the initial provisioning spares for maintenance of delivered
PRCU and STEP equipment. Spares inventory replenishment or additional
provisioning will be accomplished with follow-on purchase orders. The
contractor shall provide technical help desk support to users for
problem resolution and maintenance of PRCU and STEP equipment. The
contractor shall perform complex repair or upgrade activities at user
location or at PSIV facility, as necessary, on a case-by-case basis.
This support task shall include the first STEP unit delivered under the
NAS8-50000 contract.

**1.4.4.2.3. Payload Rack Checkout Unit Training and Certification-
Through FY02**

The contractor shall:

I&O a. Develop a Payload Rack Checkout Unit (PRCU) training and
certification plan in accordance with DR UT60.

I&O b. Conduct PRCU initial and refresher training, at each site
location, twice per calendar year, for

**1.4.4.3 Payload Rack Checkout Unit #4 Installation at KSC -- Through
FY02**

I&O The Contractor shall modify the Payload Rack Checkout Unit #4 for
installation at KSC by:

I&O a. Providing an Emergency Power Shutoff Switch (EPSS) in equipment
room and at the remote interface panel.

I&O b. Providing a remote interface panel for test of attached payloads
including: MIL-STD-1553, High Rate Data Link (HRDL), and power.

I&O c. Providing unique PRCU #4 equipment placement accommodations for
mating with the KSC facility layout.

I&O Updating PRCU #4 drawings and associated documentation to reflect
the modifications listed above.

I&O **1.4.4.4 Payload Rack Checkout Unit Sensor Calibration -- Through
FY02**

The contractor shall calibrate the Payload Rack Checkout Unit (PRCU)
number 2 prior to use in the Human Research Facility Test starting
November 1999.

**1.4.5 PAYLOAD ENGINEERING & INTEGRATION (WBS 1.4.5) -- Through FY02**

**1.4.5.1 PEI Planning -- Through FY02**

I&O (1) The contractor shall develop the plans, procedures, schedules,
and processes required to implement PEI, PSIV, and the safety functions
across the ISS. The Contractor shall develop and maintain DR PA01,
Payload Engineering Integration Plan. The Contractor shall develop and
maintain, via the change clause, DR PA02, Standard Program
Implementation Plan, Volume IV: Payload Engineering Integration.

I&O (2) The contractor shall develop and coordinate these program plans,
procedures, schedules, and processes and required data exchange products
with the International Partners. The Contractor shall obtain agreement
with NASA and the IPs for the approach for the Payload IRD and NASA
unique payload ICDs in IP modules. The Contractor shall obtain agreement
with NASA and the IPs for data exchange products.

I&O (3) The contractor shall develop and coordinate these plans,
procedures, schedules, and processes with other effected ISS teams (both
Prime and Non-Prime) which require payload products to perform their
function. The contractor shall establish a multi- team forum to review
the required products.

I&O (4) The contractor shall develop and maintain DR PA03, Payload
Verification Program Plan defining the end to end verification process
(planning, data acquisition, tools/models, use of individual payload
plans) leading to certification of individual payloads, the complement
of USOS payloads, and the manned base complement of payloads. This plan
shall be coordinated with the partners.

I&O (5) The contractor shall develop an implementation plan for defining
the process, procedures, requirements, and schedules associated with
software integration including the relationship with the Mission Build
Facility, the PCS User Board, and the SSVTF, and shall be incorporated
into DR PA01, The Payload Engineering Integration Plan.

I&O (6) The Contractor shall develop and maintain DR PA23, Generic
Payload Verification Plan and DR PA24 Generic Attached Payload
Verification Plan.

**1.4.5.2 Develop /Acquire PEI Tools -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) develop/procure/update tools and models necessary to perform
rack level, complement level (USOS Modules and Truss), and integrated
station PEI analyses for each stage. The Contractor shall document these
analyses in DR PA14, Element Level and Truss Level Payload Engineering
Analysis Reports, and DR PA15, ISS Level Payload Engineering Integration
Reports.

I&O (2) develop necessary data bases to disseminate data to other
affected ISS teams (and partners) and payload developers which require
payload products.

I&O (3) develop a process to accommodate increment specific/changing
payload resource requirements.

**1.4.5.3 Reserved -- Through FY02**

**1.4.5.4 Perform PEI -- Through FY02**

The Contractor shall:

I&O (1) manage, control, and develop payload unique ICDs for US ISPR,
Truss, and UOP payloads destined for US Lab, JEM, APM, MPLM, Truss, CAM
(DR PA16, Unique Pressurized Payload Hardware Interface Control
Documents and DR PA17, Unique Payload Software Interface Control
Documents) and truss (DR PA17, Unique Payload Software Interface Control
Documents and DR PA18, Unique Attached Payload Hardware Interface
Control Document) to ensure payloads are compatible with the system
requirements and constraints. For US payloads destined for the Partner
elements, the contractor shall develop the payload unique ICDs.

I&O (2) implement and manage a PIRN process for payload ICD changes and
lead closure of interface issues.

I&O (3) review the Payload Integration Agreement Blank book and the
Payload Integration Agreements for individual payloads.

I&O (4) perform analyses to verify that the complement of payloads
operating together meet the USOS modules and truss system capabilities
and are compatible. The complement level analyses should include (but
not limited to) the following areas: structures (loads and physical),
dynamics, microgravity, mass properties, momentum, C&DH, C&T, thermal
(active and passive including sensible and latent loads), fields of
view, power availability and channelization, EMI/EMC, acoustical noise,
contamination and material usage, vacuum exhaust, vacuum resource,
shock, particulates, radiation, fire detection and suppression, internal
clearances, EVR clearances for payloads, EVA translation paths around
payloads, human factors, nitrogen, oxygen usage, CO2 levels, and
software.

I&O (5) perform a complement level analysis of the planned payload
manifest in order to support the release of the IDRD.

I&O (6) The Contractor shall develop the Payload Operations Guidelines
and Constraints Document, DR PA19 to support the POIF. This document
shall be updated for each stage. This includes the review and
concurrence of system flight rules.

I&O (7) perform analyses to verify that the complement of all payloads,
including those operating in the various partner modules meet the ISS
system capabilities, interfaces, constraints, that the safety
requirements are implemented and document results in the Verification
Reports, DR PA20. This document shall be updated for each stage.

I&O (8) provide a capability to perform on-call, near real-time safety
analyses to support payload reconfigurations or anomaly troubleshooting
on orbit.

I&O (9) develop and maintain for each stage, DR PA21, Integrated
Drawings/ Schematics with detailed integrated schematics and drawings of
the on-board complement (including partners) depicting interfaces with
the ISS systems. The contractor shall develop and maintain for each
stage, the internal and external payload configuration/topology for the
ISS in accordance with DR PA22, Payload Stage Configuration.

I&O (10) develop an integration process that allows integration of
EXPRESS racks with EXPRESS standard payloads identified as late as L-11
months. This process is limited to a pre-defined, enveloped standard sub
rack EXPRESS payload with no exceedances, deviations or waivers.

5.  **Payload Software Control Panel -- Through FY02**

I&O (1) The Contractor shall develop and document integrated payload
software-related processes and data flows.

2.  The Contractor shall review and approve payload software related
    interface Control Documents (ICDs)

\(3\) The Contractor shall develop and submit in accordance with DR RA10
a Software Build Specification/Integrated Flight Load (or equivalent)
for each flight or payloads.

\(4\) The Contractor shall manage the development of Software
Requirements Specifications for payload-related PCS displays and shall
submit these specifications in accordance with DR RA11.

5.  **Long Spacer Shroud**

OPD The Contractor shall provide an EVA installable shroud that provides
thermal protection of the P6 Long Spacer radiator, while it is stored on
P6 Long Spacer and provides thermal protection and covers the hole
created on the P6 Long Spacer, when the radiator is located.

6.  **Active Common Attach System Test and Qualification**

OPD The Contractor shall deliver an Active Common Attach System
Simulator (ACASS) assembly that supports pre-flight check-out of the
physical and functional Active Common Attach System interfaces and
provides the capability to check that Attached Payload and Unpressurized
Cargo Carrier keel structures conform to the allowable keel physical
envelope.

7.  **PAS/Payload Interface Verification**

I&O The Contractor shall conduct interface testing of the Alpha Magnetic
Spectrometer (AMS) payload's passive Payload Attach System (PAS) with
its S3 truss attach site.

**1.5 OPERATIONS CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS SUPPORT (**WBS
1.5)

I&O The Contractor shall prepare and maintain a Concept of Operations
and Utilization Document consistent with NASA ISS Program policy (DR
MG03). The Contractor shall conduct engineering analyses and provide
data, and contract end-items to support the ISS.

**1.5.1 ASSEMBLY AND STATION MISSION OPERATIONS SUPPORT** (WBS 1.5.1)

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Analyze operations requirements to ensure program compliance.

I&O 1) Provide engineering analysis and source data to support NASA\'s
development of preflight assembly products (e.g., procedures,
techniques, mission rules, launch commit criteria) (DR OP01), except for
Cupola and Node 3.

I&O 2) Develop and provide requirements, constraints, and operational
and design limits for on-orbit Vehicle checkout and operation (DRs OP01,
VE32), except for Cupola and Node 3.

I&O 3) Provide engineering analyses, system design data, models, and
operations data to support NASA\'s development and validation of
operational products and facilities, mission planning, training, and
mission execution capabilities, except for Cupola and Node 3.

I&O 4) Provide performance and characteristics data (DR VE32), except
for Cupola and Node 3.

I&O 5) Provide craw interface data, including caution and warning limits
(DR VE32), except for Cupola and Node 3.

I&O 6) **Reserved**

I&O b. Provide operations maintenance and documentation of
flight-equivalent/functionaI-equivalent units and required supporting
software in operations facilities, except for Node 2 and Node 3.

**1.5.2 LAUNCH SITE PROCESSING** (WBS 1 5.2)

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform anaIyses to determine requirements
(DRs OP03, OP07, and VE20) applicable to prelaunch and post-landing
processing of all contract end item elements, and Launch Packages to
include:

> \(1\) Launch and landing site processing

(2) Launch and landing site test operations

> \(3\) Launch site test team participation
>
> \(4\) Ground support equipment
>
> \(5\) Skilled ground processing personnel and training.

I&O b. The Contractor shall use data, requirements, and processes
identified in paragraph 1.3.3.1 to define, develop, implement, and
manage the processing of Launch Package flight hardware at the launch
site. The Contractor shall coordinate the scheduling of processing
activities at the launch site.

I&O c. The Contractor shall document GSE functional requirements data in
the Support Equipment Item Descriptions (DR VE18).

**1.5.3 LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE (L&M) FOR VEHICLE** (WBS 1.5.3)

**1.5.3.1 Management & Integration of L&M Tasks** (WBS 1.5.3.1)

I&O The Contractor shall plan, implement, integrate, and manage L&M
support for contract end-item hardware of the ISS Program in accordance
with DRs OP04, OP05, OP06, OP12, and NMI 7500.4 to ensure ISS
supportability and shall implement an ISS integrated logistics support
system.

2.  **Logistics Analysis** (WBS 1.5.3.2)

I&O The Contractor shall conduct logistics modeling, analysis,
engineering, and logistics data integration and management for
Contractor-provided hardware per DR OP04. The Contractor shall conduct
logistics support analysis (LSA) and provide Logistics Support Analysis
Records (LSARs) (per MIL-STD-1388-2) on Contractor-provided hardware per
DR OP04. The Contractor shall provide Technical Data and Documentation
(TD&D) per DRs OP04 and OP05 through the last launch of the last
application of hardware type plus 12 months.

3.  **Spares** (WBS 1.5.3.3)

Spares The Contractor is responsible for providing the necessary
provisioning documentation, and data for the ISS Program as set forth in
OP04 and OP06. All procurements for spares shall be in accordance with
the procedures set forth in section H-2 of this contract.

4.  **Supply Support** (WBS 1.5.3.4)

The Contractor shall:

I&O a. Provide provisioning data, and participate in ISS L&M
provisioning conferences in accordance with DRs OP04 and OP06.

I&O b. Manage the Contractor-developed hardware spares and repair
program per DR OP04.

I&O c. Identify and implement Packaging, Handling, Storage, and
Transportation (PHS&T) requirements for Contractor-developed hardware
per DR OP04.

I&O d. Plan and manage acquisition of support resources for support
equipment (GSE or OSE) identified through the LSA per DR OP04.

I&O e. Identify ground and on-orbit logistics support facility
requirements per DR OP04.

I&O f. Develop a Logistics Management Responsibility Transfer (LMRT)
Plan and requirements per DR OP04.

I&O g. Perform a Post Production Support analysis per DR OP12.

**1.5.3.5 Maintenance and Resupply** (WBS 1.5.3.5)

I&O The Contractor shall develop the maintenance concepts, planning,
implementation and verification for Contractor-provided hardware per DR
OP04. The Contractor shall conduct Resupply/Return analysis on
Contractor-provided hardware per DR OP04. The Contractor shall identify
Maintenance personnel and training requirements based on LSA results.

4.  **OPERATIONS PLANNING AND CARGO INTEGRATION** (WBS 1.5.4)

I&O The Contractor shall perform system analyses and engineering
assessments for Utilization and Logistics flights to support cargo
integration activities in Space Shuttle Program Integration plans (e.g.
MIP and annex data), cargo planning and analysis, and cargo engineering
for contract end-item elements. The Contractor shall provide the Cargo
Planning, Analysis and Configuration System (CPACS) computer software
including coordination of GFE computer hardware procurement requirements
supporting software installation. The Contractor shall support cargo
manifesting by providing planning data inputs and updates to the CPACS
database for Contractor end-item hardware. The Contractor shall provide
architecture and requirements definition, and tool acceptance testing in
support of the Mission Management Data System (MMDS) database
application development.

5.  **SUSTAINING ENGINEERING** (WBS 1.5.5)

> (NOTE: STARTING 01 OCTOBER 2001, SUSTAINING ENGINEERING WILL BE
> ACCOMPLISHED UNDER SECTION 2.0, HEREOF.)

I&O a) The Contractor shall plan sustaining engineering for the U.S.
On-Orbit Segment through the performance period of this contract (DR
VE34).

I&O b) The Contractor shall plan a transition to the follow-on
sustaining engineering activities for the U.S. On-Orbit Segment (DR
VE34).

**1.5.5.2** (WBS**)**

I&O Provide business management of Sustaining Engineering activities,
including:

I&O a) Maintain and implement program control and business management
processes and systems necessary to plan, implement, control, report and
assess the sustaining engineering contract effort.

I&O b) Financial Management, Schedule Development, Subcontract
Management.

**1.5.5.3** (WBS**)**

I&O Preparation for analysis of ISS system performance, including:

I&O a) Identification of necessary ISS checkout activities and telemetry
to evaluate operational ISS system performance and environment.

I&O b) Define sustaining engineering NASA data Interfaces, data formats,
etc.

I&O c) Identification and acquisition of existing system analytical
models as required to predict performance of the ISS system.

I&O d) Modification, updating, and upkeep of analytical models to
respond to measured ISS system performance and environment.

I&O e) Planning, training, and preparation for MOIR support required for
operations, ISS performance monitoring, and support to operations
readiness simulation.

**1.5.5.4 - Reserved**

**1.5.5.5** (WBS**)**

I&O Provide operations sustaining engineering activities, including:

I&O a) Provide engineering support, technical expertise, and operations
support to participate with NASA in the development and review of plans,
processes, procedures, deviation/waiver support, and integrated
operations scheduling activities.

I&O b) Establish process for sustaining engineering review of MOD
maintenance procedures for delivered flight hardware and software.

**1.5.5.6 - Reserved**

**1.5.5.7 -- 1.5.5.12 - Reserved** (WBS)

I&O Plan and prepare for the SE Safety and Mission Assurance program.

**1.5.5.13** (WBS)

I&O Provide software sustaining engineering activities, including:

I&O a) Software Management planning and preparation.

I&O b) SVF 2A Firmware Controller planning.

**1.5.5.14** (WBS)

I&O Provide SE Implementation activities, including:

I&O a) Flight Specific Sustaining Engineering Implementation Planning
for 2A.

I&O b) Sustaining Engineering roles and responsibilities definition of
the Prime, PGs, IPs, participants, NASA, payloads, and GE providers.

I&O c) Support and provide Sustaining Engineering readiness statements
and data for Program Reviews.

I&O d) Provide access to NASA for data collection for the ISS hardware
history.

**1.5.5.15** (WBS**)**

I&O Provide SE Configuration Management activities to develop SE CM (CSA
only) Database requirements for Flight 2A interim CSA.

**1.5.6 Node Structural Test Article (STA) Move to** **JSC**

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform stress analysis to determine
suitability of NODE STA for Super Guppy flight environment and provide
the report to the Government in contractor format via contracts letter.

I&O b. The Contractor shall provide weight and Center of Gravity
analysis for Super Guppy flight planning and handling to the Government
in contractor format via contracts letter.

I&O c. The Contractor shall plan installation, install GFM vibration
measurement and recording equipment, retrieve measured data, and analyze
the data.

I&O d. The Contractor shall provide a report containing the Node STA
Accelerometer Measurement Results for the NODE STA Super Guppy flight to
the Government in contractor format within ninety (90) days after the
flight via contracts letter.

I&O e. In lieu of Super Guppy Shipping Fixture (SGSF) Environmental
Control System (ECS), the Contractor shall provide a protective tarp to
cover the integrated SGSF and NODE STA combination.

I&O f. The Contractor shall prepare the Node STA for shipment including
performing a \"walk-down\" inspection of both the interior and exterior
of the element and making the adjustments to ensure that all secondary
structure and equipment are safely configured for flight on the Super
Guppy aircraft.

I&O g. The Contractor shall provide support to the Government for
planning and execution of NODE STA lift from Space Station Element
Transport System (SSETS) to Super Guppy Shipping Fixture (SGSF).

I&O h. The Contractor shall provide support to the Government to perform
Node STA unload from SGSF and to load Node STA on to the Module Support
Stands.

I&O i. The Contractor shall provide support to the Government for
technical expertise to assist Module Support Stands, Module Lifting
Equipment, and Node STA set-up.

**1.5.7 EVA Fit Checks for Flights 3A through 7A**

I&O The Contractor shall schedule all fit checks, for flights 3A through
7A, identified by NASA in their EVA Task Matrix, document the completed
EVA fit checks and report EVA fit check progress every two weeks to the
Operations Control Board and/or EVA AIT. A fit check results summary
shall be provided to the EVA AIT.

OPD **1.5.8 ORU Support Equipment Integration/Flight Operations
Support** (WBS 1.5.8**)**

The Contractor shall perform analysis, integration, design, development,
manufacture, test, evaluation, and delivery of support equipment
required to integrate support equipment and spare Orbital Replacement
Units (ORUs) for transport to orbit, on-orbit storage, on-orbit
deployment and return to ground. Included is the effort to recover,
on-orbit integration into/onto a carrier, and return to ground ORU's
which a spare ORU is replacing. Included is the same effort for
hardware/software operational requirements, which are not classified as
ORU's such as, but not limited to, operational contingency kits/items.

OPD **1.5.8.1 ORU Support Equipment Development** (WBS 1.5.8.1)

The Contractor shall design, develop, verify, certify, fabricate, and
deliver the ORU Support Equipment that meets the requirements of the
applicable SEID (OP24) to ensure the integrity of ORU/Contingency items.

The Contractor shall maintain and repair the ORU Support equipment
developed and delivered in accordance with this SOW and the DIL.

OPD **1.5.8.2 ORU Support Equipment and ORU/Contingency Item
Interoperability Evaluation** (WBS 1.5.82.)

The Contractor shall provide Engineering Evaluation Units (EEUs) of the
planned ORU support equipment items and the ORU/Contingency Item it is
supporting per DIL or as required to support interoperability
evaluations designed to demonstrate that the proposed ORU Support
Equipment adequately enables the ORU/Contingency Item to be handled
through out all mission phases. Prior to the conduct of an
Interoperability Evaluation an evaluation procedure will be developed.
**(OP24)**

The Contractor shall document the results of the ORU Support Equipment
and ORU/Contingency Item Interoperability Evaluation **(OP25)**.

These activities shall be accomplished via bench level evaluations and
zero-g evaluation activities (e.g., neutral buoyancy evaluation, KC-135,
etc.) These EEUs will be used to evaluate both crew interfaces and
general design engineering aspects. The EEUs shall be designed and
fabricated to functionally and physically represent the planned ORU
support equipment items and be able to survive and operate as planned in
the intended evaluation environment(s).

**1.5.8.3 Crew Training Support**

OPD The Contractor shall provide support to NASA for the training of the
on-orbit crew in the use and operation of ORU Support Equipment and the
interoperability of the ORU Support Equipment Item and the
ORU/Contingency Item it is designed to accommodate as required. This
support shall include the following:

OPD a. The development of source data concerning the design, operation
and interoperability of each deliverable ORU Support Equipment item
necessary for NASA to develop crew training procedures.

I&O b. The provision of technical support, as required, during NASA's
conduct of the on-orbit crew training covering the design and
capabilities of the ORU Support Equipment and its interoperability with
the On-Orbit ORU/Contingency Item.

4.  **FSE Analytical Integration**

OPD The Contractor shall perform the analytical integration of the
Control Moment Gyro (CMG), with its Flight Support Equipment (FSE).

**1.5.9 Factory Equipment for Use as Ground Support Equipment (WBS
1.5.9)**

I&O a. The Contractor shall convert the following Factory Equipment (FE)
to Ground Support Equipment (GSE) in accordance with SSP 50004 as
modified by D684-10674-01 and deliver the equipment to the Government as
residual assets**.**

Berthing Port Fluid Interface (I/F) Test Kit

Internal TCS Fluid I/F Test Kit

Internal Thermal Control System (ITCS) Cooling Servicer

ITCS Servicing Unit

20/40 Kw Power Sources

60 Kw Power Sources

Programmable Load RPCM (PLRPC)

Programmable Load DDCU (PLDDCU)

I&O b. The Contractor shall conduct a configuration audit on the FE that
has been converted to GSE.

I&O c. The Contractor shall make the drawings and associated
documentation for the FE, which has been converted to GSE available upon
request, in contractor format, no earlier than 30 days after completion
of the audit.

I&O d. The Contractor shall make available in contractor format Hazards
Analysis with content in accordance with DR SM02 for all FE which has
been converted to GSE.

I&O e. The contractor shall provide Maintenance Plans in contractor
format with content in accordance with DR OP04 which will include as a
minimum any preventative maintenance, scheduled maintenance, and routine
maintenance actions to be taken to ensure this equipment remains in
proper operating condition for all FE which has been converted to GSE.

I&O f. The Contractor shall make available in contractor format Failure
Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) with content in accordance with DR
SM04 for the following equipment**:**

Utility Distribution System (UDS) Fluid I/F Test Kit

Berthing Port Fluids Interface (I/F) Test Kit

Internal TCS Fluid I/F Test Kit

Alcohol Flush Cart

60 Kw Power Sources

Programmable Load DDCU (PLDDCU)

Xenon Fill Cart

Thermal Control System (TCS) Ammonia Chiller/Offloader

TCS Fill and Drain Adapter (IEA)

TCS Fill and Drain Adapter (LS)

TCS Fill and Drain Adapter (Z1-Passive)

Valve Instrumentation Module (VIM)

CBM Simulator with Simulator Stand

I&O g. The contractor shall perform annual Load tests to a 125% minimum
rated load for the following equipment:

> ORU Handling Set (STD)
>
> ORU Handling Set (DDCU)

10. **Caution and Warning Logic Database**

I&O The Contractor shall develop and maintain an informational database
to identify the data and logic associated with class 1,2, and 3 C&W
events in support of Government mission operations.

11. **Software Stage Data**

I&O The Contractor shall support the Government in developing and
maintaining software stage data products.

12. **Crew Training**

I&O The Contractor shall support the Government in crew training for
USOS systems and USOS to Russian interfaces. This includes provisioning
of training aids, reviewing training protocols, supporting resolution of
issues discovered during training, and supporting training coordination
activities.

13. **MOD Product Development Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support the Government in developing flight
operations documentation. This includes providing source data for
Malfunction Procedures, and review of Station Operations Data File
(SODF), Flight Data File (FDF), Flight Rules, Assembly Operations
Handbook (AOH), systems drawings and briefs, supporting Flight
Operations Reviews (FOR), flight operations documentation Technical
Integration Meetings, flight operations document control boards, and
flight operations operational panels.

14. **Software Development Integration Support**

I&O The Contractor shall provide technical, program management, and
schedule coordination support to NASA in the integration of software
development activities of international and domestic software providers;
and coordination of related testing dependencies.

5.  **RESERVED**

**1.7 SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE** (WBS 1.7)

I&O The Contractor Safety and Mission Assurance activities shall apply
to the integration of all ISS System segments, the U.S. On-Orbit Segment
(USOS), and Contractor GSE.

I&O Analysis and assurance activities of the GFE elements, the Ground,
and International Partner/Participant segments, the FGB, and Node 2
shall be limited to requirements definition and the interfaces with the
USOS.

I&O The Contractor safety analysis and verification activities shall
include Orbiter provided hazard controls for the unique hazards created
as a result of the on-orbit ISS/Orbiter proximity operations, on-orbit
ISS/Orbiter operations while mated, and the physical integration of the
on-orbit ISS and Orbiter.

**1.7.1 SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND MAINTAINABILITY** (WBS 1.7.1)

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Safety and
Mission Assurance (S&MA) Program that encompasses:

I&O (1) Development and documentation of an Integrated S&MA Risk
Analysis. This process shall consolidate all S&MA risk aspects (e.g.
hazards, FMEA/CIL MTTR, MTBF, critical failure conditions) and result in
an integrated S&MA risk factor.

I&O (2) Safety, including system safety (hardware or software), flight
crew safety, industrial safety, test operations safety, and safety
verification in accordance with NHB 1700.1 (V1B), NASA Safety Policy and
Requirements Document and JPG 1700.1H, JSC Safety and Health Handbook.
The Contractor shall perform and document safety, hazard, and logic-tree
analyses (DR SM02) Analysis results shall be contained in the Vehicle
Master Data Base (DR VE32). The contractor shall perform an integrated
analysis to assure the ISS (modules and external accommodations
operating with complement of payloads) complies with customer defined
safety requirements. The analysis results shall be documented and
presented to the PSRP and Program Management.

I&O (3) Reliability (including verification) using Failure Mode and
Effect Analyses/Critical Items List (FMEA/CIL) analyses; limited life
items analyses; and reliability allocations, predictions, methodologies,
and models. The Contractor shall perform and document reliability
analyses, predictions. and allocations (DR SM05). The Contractor shall
perform and provide FMEA/CIL analyses (DR SM04). Analyses results shall
be contained in the Vehicle Master Data Base (DR VE32).

I&O (4) Maintainability, using requirements, allocations, analyses
(including failure detection and isolation analyses), predictions, and
verification results. The Contractor shall perform and document
maintainability analyses, predictions, and allocations (DR SM05).
Analyses results shall be contained in the Vehicle Master Data Base (DR
VE32).

I&O (5) The Contractor shall provide safety and mission assurance
analyses for the integration of NASA to NASA GFE, and integration of
International Partner/Participants elements.

I&O b. The Contractor shall identify and document all mishaps associated
with manufacturing, test, and operations of contract end-item elements
and the Launch Package integration of CEI and international elements (DR
SM03). The Contractor shall support NASA Boards investigating reportable
mishaps by providing factual information concerning the mishap, rescue,
and disaster control efforts and the designs or operations associated
with the mishap, provide contractor mishap board reports, and allow for
the testimony of witnesses before the NASA Mishap Boards.

I&O c. The Contractor shall investigate parts, materials, and safety
problems identified in the Government-industry Data Exchange Program
(GIDEP) and the NASA Alert System and provide appropriate intervention
recurrence control for contract end-items.

**1.7.1.1 Safety Analytical Integration of IP and GFE Hardware Transfer
and Stowage on ISS**

I&O For the safety Analytical Integration of IP and GFE Hardware
Transfer and Stowage on ISS, the Contractor shall:

I&O a) Support a safety assessment (eg: interface requirements, and a
set of stowage and translation related constraints), using the best data
and analyses available at the time of the assessment from the
International Partners, the GFE providers, and from NASA.

I&O b) Develop, maintain and provide to the Government in contractor
format in accordance with DR SM02, on-orbit integrated hazard analysis
documentation ("Integrated Hazard Report for Candidate Storage
Locations") for the transfer and stowage of IP and GFE hardware brought
either up or down on ISS flights (excludes J2/J12 GFE), for each Space
Station flight through flight 17A; this role includes analysis of
translation by the on-orbit crew of hardware from the transfer vehicle
(e.g. Orbiter, Progress), interface to stowage locations inside or on
the outside of the ISS, analysis of impacts due to how equipment is
stowed, and identification of any hazards or negative safety impacts
related to the transfer and stowage of IP and GFE hardware to or from
the ISS.

**1.7.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE** (WBS 1.712)

DDT&E For Contract end-items, the Contractor shall:

DDT&E a. Develop. implement and maintain a Quality Assurance program for
both hardware and software in accordance with SSP 41173.

DDT&E b. Document and report problems in accordance with DR SM07.

DDT&E c. Identify, document and report all nonconformances associated
with manufacturing, test, and operations of ISS hardware and software.
Accomplish nonconformance reporting in accordance with DR SM08.

DDT&E d. Assemble and provide Acceptance Data Packages (ADPs) in
accordance with DR PC08

**1.8 PARALLEL DEVELOPMENT** (WBS 1.8)

DDT&E The Contractor shall preserve the ability to develop alternate
capabilities for the FGB and Service Module through the launch of the
FGB. The impact to the established launch sequence shall be evaluated.

**1.9 DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION (DDT&E) LEVEL OF EFFORT
(LOE)** (WBS 1.9)

I&O a) Introduction

I&O The Contractor shall provide level of effort support at field and
plant locations for the following task categories:

I&O b) LOE Support Categories

1)  Engineering Analyses

> The Contractor shall provide engineering analyses to the flight crew
> (e.g., engineering analyses for flight experiments or development of
> on-orbit operations requirements.)

2)  Special Studies

> The Government may require the Contractor to perform special ISS
> related studies that are not already covered in the SOW. Special
> studies or tasks to be performed will be specifically defined in the
> task order executed by the Contracting Officer.

3)  Requests for Technical Support Data

> The Government may request that the Contractor deliver technical
> support data at a time different than the scheduled Engineering
> Release Unit (ERU) delivery. It is recognized that early data will be
> identified and accepted as pre-ERU draft material.

4)  Strategic Planning Support

> The Contractor shall provide support to facilitate the development of
> a policy deployment process to guide NASA and International Space
> Station strategic planning.

I&O c) LOE Support Tasks:

1.  Technical Support to Data Management System - Russian (DMS-R)
    Development (April 11, 1995 through May 15, 1996)

2.  Strategic Planning Support (June 6, 1995 through September 30, 1996)

3.  Technical Support to Russian Service Module Data Management System
    (DMS-R) Requirements Analysis (July 17, 1995 through August 11,
    1995)

4.  Technical Support to Matrix X Model Pathfinder Analysis (August 22,
    1995 through February 1, 1996)

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
5.  Dynamics Analysis to Support Centrifuge Accommodation Module (CAM)
    Acquisition (April 12, 1995 through April 28, 1995)

6.  Assessment of Russian Docking Loads (December 21, 1994 through
    January 16, 1995)

7.  Evaluation of Russian Space Station Options (January 5, 1996 through
    August 22, 1996)

8.  Flight Crew Operations Directorate Engineering Support (March 10,
    1995 through September 30, 1996)

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
9.  The Contractor shall support the following activities for Node 3
    ending September 30, 2001.

    a.  Maintain the Contractor provided hardware component
        specifications and ICD's under contractor control in accordance
        with SSP 41170, paragraph 3.3.2.2.

    b.  Support the following Node 3 design reviews (data review, RID
        development, pre co-location telecon support, Review attendance
        )

        1.  DR1

        2.  DR2

        3.  AR

    c.  Support one Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM) on Node 3 .The
        TIM will be in Huntsville, AL.

    d.  Support NASA upon request for internal Node 3 ECLS interfaces
        and hardware.

    e.  Perform Remote Terminal (RT) validation testing for up to 5
        unique NASA provided TR's in the Node 3.

    f.  Support C&DH hardware architecture issues.

**1.9.1 Ammonia Tank Assembly (ATA) Support of UF-4 Spacelab Pallet
(SLP) Integration**

**Activities**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support for UF-4 Spacelab Pallet Cargo
Element integration technical discussions, safety assessments and
program reviews involving ATA analytical and physical integration
activities and issues.

**1.9.2 Russian Service Module/Command and Data Handling End to End Test
Support**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support to NASA, as noted in the
following subparagraphs, for the purpose of supporting the development
and execution of Service Module/Command and Data Handling Command and
Control end to end testing necessary to verify that the ground to
vehicle command and telemetry paths are functional and meet program
requirements.

I&O (1) The Contractor shall support a test on location in Russia which
shall use a 1R Configuration with the Node 1 MDM.

I&O (2) The Contractor shall support a test on location in Russia which
shall use a 5A configuration with the C&C MDM.

I&O (3) The Contractor shall support two Reverse End to End tests at the
SVF in the US.

I&O (4) The Contractor shall develop and document in Contractor format
the test procedures and a test report for each test as identified above.
The Contractor shall also develop and document in Contractor format test
protocols for each test held in Russia as identified above.

I&O (5) The Contractor shall provide support to meetings and telecons to
coordinate this test effort, including travel to Russia..

I&O (6) The Contractor shall support Y2K ETE testing for Y2K compliance.
This test will be conducted at Energia. A reverse test at the SVF shall
be performed.

**1.10 TECHNICAL DEFINITION OF CONTRACT CHANGES (WBS 1.10) -- Through
FY99**

I&O a. Introduction

I&O Any work provided under this paragraph will be authorized through
the issuance of task orders in accordance with the task order procedure
set forth in Section G, (Article G.16). Each task order will contain the
scope of work, period of performance, and all such instructions
necessary to properly define the desired effort. It is contemplated that
the Contracting Officer will issue one task order at the beginning of
each calendar year. Technical Definition Authorization Forms (Attachment
J-18, Page 1) shall be utilized as the authorizing document to draw
against the calendar year Task Order and must be signed by 1) NASA
Contracting Officer, 2) NASA Panel/Board Chairman, and 3) Prime
Panel/Board Co-Chairman. For each task order issued the Contractor will
separately account for and identify all potential contract changes for
which technical definition of a contract change is being performed under
that task order. No later than the 15th calendar day of each month the
Contractor shall prepare a report listing all potential changes approved
for and being accounted for under the technical definition activity.
These monthly reports (DR PC16) will be made available to the
Contracting Officer upon request.

I&O b. Technical Definition of Contract Changes- LOE Support

I&O Technical definition of contract changes is the activity that
entails joint prime/product group (PG) performance of:

-   achievement of a technical solution to any program issue that is
    expected to result in a change to the contract, based on an
    assessment performed (including initial ROM) by an appropriate
    change screening forum;

-   drafting the language to revise specifications and other technical
    documents that will be

    affected by implementing the technical solution ("from-to"
    language);

-   accomplish pre-proposal fact-finding activities with NASA, including
    review of labor/material estimates;

-   completion of the change package, which includes, as required:

-   the Change Request (CR)and Program release of a Space Station Change
    Memo (SSCM), documents that specify the exact nature of the change
    and serve as the "governing requirements documents";

-   the draft "from-to" language that revises affected documents;

-   commit proposal and change implementation schedules;

-   trade studies as required to down select to final solution

-   definition of work content at WBS level 2 (or lower)

-   Rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimate, BOE, or not to exceed fee
    (if \$1M or greater)

I&O c. The LOE for technical definition is complete when either: 1) the
contracting officer authorizes implementation; 2) the completed SSCM is
released by the Program; or 3) the change is canceled/disapproved;
whichever occurs first. In the case of (1) above any remaining technical
definition effort will occur under proposal preparation.

**1.11 EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION**

**1.11.1 Zero-G Stowage Rack**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall perform an acoustic analysis with GFE
Zero-G Stowage Racks, PART NUMBER 9070285, installed in the Node 1
Zenith and Port locations and determine the impact to Node 1 when
compared to the Acoustic Test results conducted with the Rack Volume
Close Outs installed in the Node 1 Zenith and Port locations.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall perform an illumination analysis with GFE
Zero-G Stowage Racks, PART NUMBER 9070285, installed in the Node 1
Zenith and Port locations and determine the impact to Node 1 when
compared to the Illumination Test results conducted with the Rack Volume
Close Outs installed in the Node 1 Zenith and Port locations.

DDT&E c. The GFE Zero-G Stowage Rack acoustic and illumination report,
which contains the analysis and comparison results, shall be delivered
by the contractor to the Government no later than 90 days after
completion of the comparison in contractor format.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall develop a Zero-G Stowage Rack Installation
drawing to install the GFE Zero-G Stowage Racks, PART NUMBER 9070285,
into the Node 1 Zenith and Port locations.

DDT&E e. The Contractor shall perform a structural analysis to ensure
that the installation of the Zero-G Stowage Racks, PART NUMBER 9070285,
will not invalidate the integrity of the Node 1 attach points due to
launch/on-orbit loads.

DDT&E f. The GFE Zero-G Stowage Rack structural analysis shall be
delivered by the contractor to the Government no later than 90 days
after completion of analysis in contractor format.

DDT&E g. The contractor shall modify two Rack Volume Close Outs, PART
NUMBER 683-60450-1, at KSC by transferring PIP pins from the Rack Volume
Close Outs to the Zero-G Stowage Rack, per the following procedure:

> 1\. Two PIP pin interface internal to Zero-G Stowage Rack Frame

DDT&E On Rack Volume Close Outs : First remove the Sleeve (MS51844-6)
which retains the tether holding PIP pin PART NUMBER 56937-1A (Find
Number 10 of 683-60027) to the Rack Volume Close Outs Turnbuckle.
Discard sleeves. Quantity involved: 2 pins.

DDT&E On Zero-G Stowage Rack: Install tether of PIP pin PART NUMBER
56937-1A (Find Number 10 of 683-60027) onto Zero-G Stowage Rack
Turnbuckle (9070292-32) by crimping Sleeve (MS51844-6), which is
supplied with the Zero-G Stowage Rack, onto

> the tether. Quantity involved: 2 pins. Zero-G Stowage Rack provides
> quantity 2 of the sleeves with each Zero-G Stowage Rack delivered to
> NASA.

DDT&E 2. Four PIP pin interface between Zero-G Stowage Rack and Node
(Module dependent)

DDT&E On Zero-G Stowage Rack: Install tether of PIP pin PART NUMBER
56937-3 to Slides 9070292-13 and 9070292-14 by crimping Sleeve
(MS51844-6), which must be obtained from the module integrator at KSC.
Quantity involved: 4 pins. KSC must provide quantity 4 of the sleeves
with each Zero-G Stowage Rack installed into a module.

DDT&E h. The two removed Rack Volume Close Outs shall have Problem
Reports written, documenting that they are no longer to print, and be
placed in Government (KSC) inventory at DD250 of the Node.

DDT&E Contractor shall install, per the Zero-G Stowage Rack Installation
and Checkout Procedure, two GFE Zero-G Stowage Racks, PART NUMBER
9070285, into the Node 1 Zenith and Port locations at KSC.

**1.12 INSTALL NON-SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT AS DIRECTED**

**1.12.1 Installation of Internal UHF Communications**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall install wiring, couplers, and internal
antenna for internal UHF communications from the USL SSSR to within the
normally pressurized and generally IVA-accessible volume of the USL,
provide a UHF interface to the Node 1 (for internal UHF communication
within Node 1 and HAB), and provide a UHF interface to the Node 2 (for
internal UHF communication within Node 2, APM, and JEM). UHF
distribution from USL to the Node 1, for Airlock UHF communications is
contained in the performance requirements of the USOS and USL
specifications.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall install wiring, couplers, and internal
antenna for Internal UHF communications within the normally pressurized
and generally IVA accessible volume of the Node 1, provide a UHF
interface to the USL (to connect to USL SSSR), provide a UHF interfaces
to the HAB (for internal UHF communication within HAB), and provide a
UHF interface to the Airlock (for internal UHF communications within
Airlock).

DDT&E c. The ISS UHF connectors shall be in accordance with SSQ 21635 or
SSQ 21636.

DDT&E d. The ISS UHF RF cable shall be in accordance with SSQ 21653.

DDT&E e. The ISS IAA shall consist of the following equipment:

SMA CABLE CONNECTOR (FOR COAX - 3) 683 - 50901 - 1

SMA ADAPTOR 683 - 50903 - 1

MONOPOLE ANTENNA 683 - 50904 - 1

IAA PATCH ANTENNA 683 - 28005 - 1

R. F. CABLE NRFC - 50 - COAX -3

R. F. TERMINATOR 683 - 28005 - 4

R. F. COUPLER ( N1 ) 683 - 28005 - 2

R. F. COUPLER ( AIRLOCK ) 683 - 28005 - 5

R. F. COUPLER ( N2 ) 683 - 28005 - 7

R. F. COUPLER ( C1 ) ( LAB ) 683 - 28005 - 8

R. F. COUPLER ( C2 ) ( LAB ) 683 - 28005 - 9

**1.13 NODE 2 RECONFIGURATION**

I&O The Node 2 shall be GFE to the USOS. Data associated with the Node 2
for Contractor integration activities shall be provided in accordance
with Attachment J-12.

**1.13.1 Common Hardware/Software Related to Node 2**

DDT&E The Contractor shall develop Hardware and Software for
installation in Node 2 for delivery in accordance with the DIL. This
hardware and software shall be considered Common Hardware and Software
and controlled in accordance with SSP 41170, paragraphs 3.3.2.2,
3.3.2.3, and 3.3.2.4. Prior to establishment of the NASA baseline, the
Contractor shall provide notification of changes to the Common Hardware
to MSFC, and Alenia by sending a copy of all proposed and authorized
changes as

well as revisions and change notices to the Common Hardware
Specifications to each of the locations identified. Traceability from
the common component Hardware and Software shall be completed to the
Node 2 PIDS (SSP50290) by NASA as Government Furnished Data (GFD)

**1.13.2 Technical Support to Alenia for Node 2**

I&O The Contractor shall support NASA and Alenia in the development of
the Node 2 by providing the technical support in the following area for
a period of time not to exceed 1 year starting December 1, 1997:

I&O a. TIMs on Component performance, models, technical data, and
analysis

I&O b. TIMs to assist NASA/Alenia in understanding and integrating the
PG-3 developed component hardware.

**1.13.3 Node 2 Specification Maintenance**

I&O The Contractor shall maintain the Node 2 specification (SSP 50290)
in accordance with DR VE07. The Contractor shall support NASA in
negotiating future changes with Alenia and the resolution of issues that
pertain to the Italian Node 2.

**1.13.4 Node STA Disposition**

I&O The Contractor shall place the Node STA in controlled storage(fully
environmentally conditioned, corrosion inspection periodically, etc.)
with the same configuration control and quality provisions required for
flight hardware. The Contractor shall assume a period of performance for
this storage based on the assumption that the STA will be turned over to
NASA as a residual at the end of the contract. The instrumentation
utilized for the Node STA shall be left in place on the Node STA.

**1.13.5 Node STA Refurbishment**

DDT&E The Contractor shall remove and refurbish the Node STA Hatches,
ACBM's, and PCBM for delivery to NASA in accordance with the DIL.

**1.13.6 Node 2 Verification Support**

> I&O a. The Contractor shall provide the technical support and
> expertise necessary to support the NASA verification activities for
> the Node 2. The activities that the Contractor shall support are as
> specified in the Program Master Integration and Verification Plan
> (D684-10020-1).

I&O b. The Contractor shall perform fit-checks of the CAM, JEM, MPLM,
and APM side of the interface with Node 2 vestibule jumpers at KSC after
Node 2 delivery.

I&O c. The Contractor shall perform the Digital Pre-assembly tasks for
Node 2 in Turin, Italy.

I&O d. The Contractor shall perform the Fluid and Cable Fit Checks for
Node 2 at KSC after Node 2 delivery.

**1.13.7 CBM Kit Deliveries**

**1.13.7.1 ACBM Kits**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall deliver ACBM ring kits to NASA in
accordance with the DIL. The Contractor shall provide, with the ACBM
ring kit, validated installation drawings, installation procedures, and
the test procedures.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall ship ACBM mechanism kits to Alenia in
accordance with the DIL. The Contractor shall provide the personnel
expertise and equipment to install the mechanism kits onto Node 2. The
Contractor shall perform Acceptance Test Procedures (ATP) to ensure the
operability of the ACBM's mechanisms in the installed configuration.
After a successful ATP, the ACBM mechanisms shall be delivered to NASA.
This installation task does not include the ACBM MLI blanket or MOD
shield installation.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall deliver, with the ACBM mechanism kit,
validated installation procedures installation drawings, and
installation test procedures.

**1.13.7.2 PCBM Kit**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall deliver the PCBM kit ( as defined in the
currently developed kit drawings for Node 1) in accordance with the DIL.
The Contractor shall provide technical support to Alenia technicians
during Alenia PCBM installation and check-out on-site at Alenia.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall provide, with the PCBM kit, validated
installation procedures installation drawings and installation test
procedures.

**1.13.7.3 CBM/Hatch Support and Analysis**

I&O a. The Contractor shall perform analysis to verify that the loads
(structural and thermal) at the ACBM/PCBM to Node 2 interfaces,
including attachment bolts, do not exceed the capability of the current
ACBM/PCBM design based on NASA provided Node 2 structural models. Two
analyses each for the axial active port, radial active port, and one
axial passive port shall be performed.

I&O b. The contractor shall provide ACBM/PCBM technical support to NASA
during TIMs in the U.S. at one per quarter except for when there is a
design review in Torino until shipment of the CBM's to Alenia. The
contractor shall provide ACBM/PCBM technical support for 3 Design
Reviews in Torino, Italy.

I&O c. The contractor shall provide one time Hatch technical support to
assess hatch conformity to the Node 2 structure for both axial and
radial ports.

**1.13.7.4 ACBM Interface Definition**

I&O a. The Contractor shall develop PIRNs to the ACBM ICD to define the
ACBM interfaces to Node 2.

I&O b. The Contractor shall support Interface Control Working Group
(ICWG) meetings to finalize the PIRNs with the affected parties.

**1.13.8 Node 2 Vestibule Jumpers**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall design, develop, manufacture, verify by
analysis, and deliver Node 2 vestibule jumper kits in accordance with
the DIL.

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall develop and document the requirements and
interface definition for the vestibule jumpers via PIRNs to the external
element ICDs. The Contractor shall support one ICWG to coordinate the
PIRNs with the ICD participants

**1.13.9 Common Hardware Requirements**

DDT&E The Contractor provided Node 2 Common Component Hardware and
Software shall be designed, developed, and verified in accordance with
Contractor controlled specification, interface control, and procurement
documents.

**1.13.10 Node 2 Software Support**

**1.13.10.1 Node 2 Software Test Support**

I&O The Contractor shall provide software developer factory support and
on-site support at Alenia test facilities, during Node 2 element testing
from March 2000 to July 2000 on a 1 shift basis and support for NASA/ASI
Joint (H/W and S/W integration) tests from July 2000 through September
2000 in accordance with D684-10020-01. Support for end item testing
shall not exceed 4550 hours. Support for Joint testing shall not exceed
2980 hours. The Contractor shall provide additional on-site flight
software support at Alenia in Turin, Italy, during Node 2 Off-Line
software testing through FY01.

**1.13.10.2 Software User Manuals**

DDT&E The Contractor shall document the Software User Manuals in
accordance with D684-10017-1 for the N2-1 and N2-2, CSCI's.

**1.13.10.3 Software Telecon Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support software telecons with Alenia at a rate
not to exceed 24 per year until DD250 of the N2-1 and N2-2 CSCI's.

**1.13.10.4 Software Test Planning Support**

I&O The Contractor shall provide technical support on-site at Boeing
Huntsville for review and comment on test plans and procedures. The
support shall be limited to the following:

1)  identification of those Node 2 Prime Item development Specification
    (PIDS) requirements that are allocated to the Node 2 CSCI's,

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
2)  requirement analysis,

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
3)  analysis of test plans and procedures to ensure the tests verify
    compliance with PIDS requirements, and

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
4)  traceability analysis to verify every PIDS requirement has been
    tested.

I&O These tasks shall be accomplished by a review of the Node 2 PIDS,
SSP 50290.

**1.13.10.5 Software TIM Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support 2 Software TIMs per year, one at Alenia
and one at Huntsville, until DD250 of the N2-1 and N2-2 CSCI's.

**1.13.11 Support to the Joint Testing**

I&O The Contractor shall support the NASA/ASI Joint (Hardware/Software
Integration) testing as follows:

1.  Review plan/procedures,

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
2.  Provide on-site support for the testing,

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
3.  Support the Test Readiness Review - to be held in Torino, Italy,

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
4.  Develop and validate the Internal Element SIM to ensure the
    operability of the Internal System CSCI during the testing.

**1.13.12 Common Hardware Storage**

I&O The Contractor shall provide the storage space to accommodate all of
the U.S. contractor provided Node 2 Component Hardware from the time of
delivery to NASA until delivery to Alenia per the DIL.

This storage shall be a controlled and bonded storage facility that
meets all provisions required for flight hardware. The Common Component
Hardware shall be DD250's to NASA at the vendor location prior to
shipment to the storage facility.

**1.13.13 Data Support to NASA**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support to NASA for collection and
delivery of data related to the Common Hardware and Software developed
for Node 2 as requested by NASA. This data support shall consist of
providing a copy of existing data to NASA upon request as the data is
available during its normal life cycle development.

**1.13.14 Node 2/Node 3 Liaison**

I&O a. The contractor shall provide Node 2/Node 3 technical Liaison with
NASA to facilitate the following activities as defined in this SOW
:Coordination of Node 2 and Node 3 component hardware and software
delivery schedules

I&O b. Coordination of Common Hardware data deliveries

I&O c. Coordination of contractor participation in the Node 2 and Node 3
design reviews.

I&O d. Coordination of joint Node 2 and Node 3 DDT&E activities.

**1.13.15 PROP MODULE POWER INTERFACE FOR NODE 2**

**1.13.15.1 Connector Procurement**

DDT&E The Contractor shall procure and deliver to NASA stores in
Huntsville, AL as defined in paragraph 1.13.12 the additional connector
as defined in the DIL.

**1.13.15.2 Dead Face Connector Procurement**

DDT&E The Contractor shall procure and deliver to NASA stores in
Huntsville, AL two dead face connectors as defined in the DIL.

**1.13.16 Utility Rail Modification for Node 2**

DDT&E The Contractor shall modify the existing utility rail (P/N
1F97036-1) for Node 2 to accept a single Type VI RPCM in the spare slot
"C". The data bus address for this slot shall be "15." This Utility Rail
will have a unique P/N assigned and delivered in accordance with the
DIL.

**1.13.17 Node 2 Hardware Tasks**

I&O **1.13.17.1 Node 2 and 3 Procurement Status**

The contractor shall provide the status of all items for delivery
associated with Node 2 and 3 in accordance with DR PC24.

I&O **1.13.17.2** **Node 2 and 3 Component Installation Kit
Development**

The Contractor shall provide a listing by part number and nomenclature
of all the parts necessary to install and ensure functionality of the
components listed in the DIL for Node 2 and 3. This listing shall be
based on the typical installation utilized by the Contractor for
installation of the components in the Contractors Elements. The listing
by component shall be submitted to the Government in contractor format.

DDT&E **1.13.17.3 Node 2 Dead Face Connectors**

The Contractor shall design, develop, manufacture, verify, and deliver
the Dead Face connector assemblies that will attach to the vestibule
connectors for Node 2 as defined in the DIL

DDT&E **1.13.17.4 Provide Ammonia/Water Head Exchanger Heater
Temperature Sensor Assemblies**

The contractor shall develop, manufacture, verify, and deliver twelve
(12) new ammonia/water temperature sensor assemblies based on
NASA-provided Node 2 interface information and in accordance with the
DIL. The contractor shall develop an ICD to document the 12 interfaces
between Node 2 and the temperature sensor assemblies to document the
necessary design constraints for the design, manufacture, and
verification of the temperature sensor assemblies.

OPD **1.13.17.5 Node Rack Tilt Tool**

> **OPD** The Contractor shall deliver a tool to insert, remove, and
> tilt racks during Node 2 testing at KSC.

**1.14 MINI PRESSURIZED LOGISTICS MODULE**

**1.14.1 MPLM Rack Installation**

I&O The Contractor shall provide the following items in contractor
format to the Government view contract letter no later than December 15,
1998:

I&O 1. Flight and ground integration drawings, requirements, analysis,
and procedures for the following tasks for MPLM rack
integration/de-integration:

a\. Positioning a knee brace to accept a rack.

b\. Adjusting knee brace settings.

c\. Attaching/removing knee brace to a rack.

d\. Attaching/removing the rack (lower attach points) to the MPLM.

e.  Provide support for drawings to resolve Government issues and

> Concerns and provide one update of the drawings to reflect resolution
>
> prior to delivery.

I&O 2. Add definition of the knee brace and knee brace interfaces to SSP
41017, Part II by developing a PIRM no later than December 15, 1998.

I&O 3. Provide ICWG support to resolve the issues/comments to the
updates to SSP 41017, Part II.

I&O 4. Provide support to NASA to review and comment on Alenia design
documentation for the knee brace bracket to ensure knee brace
operability. Comments to be provided by contracts letter.

**1.14.2 MPLM CAD Modeling**

I&O Provide robust CAD man-modeling, based upon receipt of the MPLM CAD
models in accordance with J-2 on the contract, for the following no
later than May 1, 1999.

a\. Flight 6A configured MPLM on-orbit removal of racks, translation,
and

installation into the USL.

b\. Example on-orbit installation of racks into the MPLM utilizing the
case

point for UF-2.

1.  **CAS/Payload Interface Verification**

OPD 1. The Contractor shall deliver a Passive Common Attach System
Simulator (PCASS) in accordance with S684-11320, Non-Complex Item
Development Specification for the PCASS.

**1.15 SUPER GUPPY TASKS**

I&O a. (1) As a part of the Super Guppy vibration and acoustic
environment characterization effort the Contractor shall: Provide
personnel to support the test instrumentation equipment installed in the
Super Guppy for vibration and acoustic environment characterization
testing for one week during April, 1998, five days a week during a
single work shift per day, to support two flights at Ellington Field,
Houston, Texas.

> \(2\) Develop testing procedures.
>
> \(3\) Support the NASA test readiness review (TRR) at JSC to review
> TRR data package prior to the TRR and resolve open issues after TRR.

I&O b. The Contractor shall install and then remove at the end of
testing, test instrumentation equipment on the GFE Super Guppy and Super
Guppy Shipping Fixture (SGSF) at Ellington Field, Houston, Texas to
support the Super Guppy vibration and acoustic environment
characterization testing.

I&O c. The Contractor shall analyze and perform data reduction of the
Super Guppy vibration and acoustic environment characterization test
data.

I&O d. The Contractor shall prepare a Super Guppy vibration and acoustic
environment characterization test report which documents the data
obtained, any anomalies encountered during the testing based on the test
results, and the results of the test analysis and data reduction.

I&O e. The Contractor shall submit one electronic and two paper copies
of the Super Guppy vibration and acoustic environment characterization
test report to the Government, in contractor format no later than four
weeks after the completion of the test analysis and data reduction. The
electronic versions shall be compatible with MS Word, version 7.0 and
Excel, version 7.0.

I&O f. The Contractor shall conduct Super Guppy flight test coupled
loads analyses for USL (CI number 683400A), Airlock (CI number 684CA7A),
ITS S0 (CI number 222200A), ITS S1 (CI number 222220A), ITS P1 (CI
number 222260A), and Common Module (Part Number TBD) using the GFE
provided Super Guppy flight loads coupling model.

I&O g. The Contractor shall prepare a Super Guppy vibration and acoustic
coupling environment report which documents Super Guppy flight test
coupled loads analyses results for each item analyzed.

I&O h. The Contractor shall submit one electronic and two paper copies
of the Super Guppy vibration and acoustic environment coupling reports
to the Government in contractor format no later than four weeks after
the each of the analyses are completed. The electronic versions shall be
compatible with MS Word, version 7.0 and Excel, version 7.0.

I&O i. The Contractor shall provide support to NASA Program Office for
the development of the Super Guppy transportation operation planing.

I&O j. The Contractor shall provide support to NASA Program Office for
the development of the Super Guppy procedures development and inclusion
in the Super Guppy transportation plan.

I&O k. The Contractor shall update D684-10041-1-6, Packaging, Handling,
Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T) Plan and deliver a copy of the
updated document to the Government. The update shall include changing
from the C-5C/Space Cargo

I&O Transportation System (SCTS) to the Super Guppy as the primary mode
for air movement of International Space Station oversize elements. The
update shall include the addition of an appendix detailing the
transportation environments.

I&O l. The Contractor shall compare the transportation analyses which
was completed using the SCTS, Space Station Element Transportation
System (SSETS) and Barge, Over-The-Road and Barge, and the Oversize
Element Transportation Cradle (OETC) to the Super Guppy and SGSF
analyses. The Contractor shall document the additional tasks and effort
required to baseline operations to use Super Guppy and SGSF as the
primary mode for movement of International Space Station oversize
elements.

I&O m. The Contractor shall support the SGSF PDR, CDR, manufacturing
review, and certification by reviewing the data packages, submitting
review item discrepancies, and providing technical support for general
support related to the reviews and certification of the SGSF.

I&O n. The Contractor shall provide a mass simulator in accordance with
NASA memorandum OC-98-010, dated February 03, 1998 to support testing of
SGSF.

I&O o. The Contractor shall develop unique move plans, containing
information on the unique hardware, facilities interfaces, and location
operations tasking, in accordance with DR OP 04 for each oversize
element to be moved using the Super Guppy and SGSF. For move plans
involving Government owned locations the Contractor shall receive GFD
operations tasking requirements for inclusion in the move plan.

I&O p. The Contractor shall support a Government conducted Super Guppy
and SGSF pathfinder mission from Ellington Field, Houston, Texas to MSFC
during the third quarter of calendar year 1998 by providing support to
the Government for unloading and loading the Space Station equipment
from the Super Guppy shipping fixture.

I&O q. The Contractor shall provide a transportation route survey
between Boeing Huntington Beach Building 46C to Los Alamitos Airfield
for equipment with a height of 25 feet, width of 18 feet, and length of
80 feet.

I&O r. The Contractor shall provide for obstruction removal or clearance
for the transportation of equipment with a height of 25 feet, width of
18 feet, and length of 80 feet between Boeing Huntington Beach Building
46C to Los Alamitos Airfield.

DDT&E, I&O **1.16 YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE**

Spares, OPD

"Year 2000 compliant," as used herein, means that the information
technology (hardware, software and

firmware, including embedded systems or any other electro-mechanical or
processor-based systems used in accordance with its associated
documentation) accurately processes date and date-related data
(including, but not limited to, calculating, comparing, and sequencing)
from, into, and between the

twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and the years 1999 and 2000 and
leap year calculations, to the extent that other information technology,
used in combination with the information technology being acquired,
properly exchanges date and date-related data with it.

Any information technology provided, operated and/or maintained under
this contract must be Year 2000 compliant. To ensure this result, the
Contractor shall provide Year 2000 documentation describing how the IT
items or services demonstrate Year 2000 compliance, consisting of
standard product literature or test reports for commercial items, and
test procedures and test reports for integrated systems.

Milestones for Renovation, Validation and Implementation: Any IT
determined to be non-Year 2000 compliant shall be replaced, retired, or
repaired in accordance with the following schedule:

-   "Renovation" includes making and documenting software and hardware
    changes, developing replacement systems, and decommissioning systems
    to be retired. The Contractor must complete renovation of affected
    software, hardware and firmware by September 30, 1998.

-   "Validation" includes unit, integration, system, and end-to-end
    testing for Year 2000 compliance. The Contractor must complete
    validation and testing of converted or replaced systems by January
    31, 1999.

-   "Implementation" includes acceptance testing and integration of
    converted and replaced systems into a production environment. The
    Contractor must complete implementation by March 31, 1999.

At a minimum, the Contractor shall provide documentation, including
project plans and status reports, which demonstrate that the Contractor
is meeting the milestones listed above.

**1.17 NODE 3**

**1.17.1 Node 3 Requirements Development**

I&O a) The Contractor shall perform the following set of tasks to
develop the documentation set to define the NASA provided GFE Node 3:

1.  Develop a Draft Node 3 Specification that is compliant with the Type
    B1 specification guidelines in SSP 41171 based on the architecture
    developed for Node 3 and deliver in accordance with DR VE07 by April
    9, 1998.

2.  Develop a Draft Type C specification for the ARS rack and deliver by
    April 9, 1998.

3.  Develop draft PIRNs (part 1 only) to the following ICDs: SSP 42007,
    SSP 42097, SSP 42003, SSP 42004, SSP 41143, SSP 41142, SSP 42137,
    and SSP 41140 in accordance with DR VE05 by April 9, 1998.

4.  Develop Draft ICDs (new) (part 1 only) for the following interfaces:
    ARS Rack to Node 3 (Standard ICD/IDD), and the preliminary draft of
    the Node 3 to Hab, ICDs in accordance with DR VE05 by April 9, 1998.

5.  Document the architecture that is developed for Node 3 in draft
    versions of the architecture notebooks.

6.  Develop 3 Draft Software Requirements Specifications for the two new
    CSCIs that are compliant with the Node 3 PIDS requirements and
    update the PMCUA SRS and deliver to NASA by June 5, 1998.

7.  Support NASA in the development of Bilateral documentation (BIVP,
    BDEA, BHSEALS only).

8.  Develop updates to SSP 30459 and D684-10015-01 to reflect
    responsibilities for revised/new ICD's.

I&O b. The contractor shall support the Reference Configuration Review
(RCR).

1.  Support NASA in the resolution of RCR issues with the RCR

2.  Provide technical support to NASA by traveling to the Node 3 RCR.
    This shall consist of the following areas of support as a minimum:
    Requirements, ICDs, Thermal, C&T, ECLS, Structures, C&DH
    (Huntsville) EVR, Microgravity, EPS.

3.  Document and provide a listing of all open RCR issues after
    completion of the RCR against the Node 3 Specification and element
    to element Part I ICDs. This is to be completed by 30 days after
    RCR.

**1.17.2 Node 3 Hardware Procurement**

OPD 1) The contractor shall develop, manufacture, and verify the
hardware required to support the Node 3 development by NASA and deliver
the hardware as identified on the DIL in accordance with the contractor
developed and controlled specifications for those items. No support
beyond what is defined in paragraph 1.17.1 is required.

I&O 2) Store any Hardware DD250'd prior to 12/01/00 in accordance with
the DIL in bonded storage facility.

OPD 3) The Contractor shall procurement Emergency Egress Lighting Power
supplies to support the outfitting of Node 3.

**1.18 SPARES WAREHOUSE (SWH) CARGO INTEGRATION**

DDT&E a. The Contractor shall develop, fabricate, and deliver a high
fidelity NBL compatible mock-up of the Flight releasable Attachment
Mechanism (FRAM).

DDT&E b. The Contractor shall continue the development of the FRAM
Flight drawings to CDR level in accordance with DR PC05, except, for
commercial off-the-shelf items, commercial data shall be provided as
defined by SSP 41170, paragraph 3.3.1.2.5.

DDT&E c. The Contractor shall develop, fabricate, and deliver a FRAM
engineering unit.

DDT&E d. The Contractor shall develop, fabricate, and deliver a high
fidelity NBL compatible mock-up for the Trunnion Pin Attachment
Mechanism.

DDT&E e. The Contractor shall develop, fabricate, and deliver a low
fidelity mock-up for ORU thermal protective system based on SWH Review
Item Dispositions (RID) generated during Preliminary Design Review
meeting.

DDT&E f. The Contractor shall perform Modified EDO Pallet (MEP) longeron
and keel trunnion configuration options study, document results and
deliver to the Government.

DDT&E g. The Contractor shall perform MEP CAD model verification.

DDT&E h. The Contractor provide to the Government, the final technical
report of EVR/SPDM related analyses for ISSP specifically identified as
"critical spares", via contract letter within 90 days after completion.

DDT&E i. The Contractor shall perform modifications to ITS Z1 to add a
power outlet and to verify that the added power outlet can provide up to
1000 watts of secondary electrical power at a voltage of 115 to 126
volts.

**1.19.1 Node 2 and 3 GSE Support**

I&O **1.19.1.1 Node 2 and 3 GSE Transfer**

The Contractor shall loan support equipment to NASA for use in Torino,
Italy by Alenia Spazio as defined in J-24.

This equipment shall be transferred to the Government via DD1149.

I&O **1.19.1.2 Training for Node 2 and 3 GSE**

The Contractor shall provide a one time training session to Alenia
technicians, at the site the hardware is located prior to DD 1149, in
the use of the noncomplex equipment as defined in J-24.

I&O **1.19.2 Node 2 and 3 GSE ICD/IDD Development**

The Contractor shall develop, document, and maintain one ICD (not to
exceed 30 pages) for Node 2 and 3 in accordance with SSP 30459 as a NASA
controlled ICD. Support development of one Interface Definition Document
(not to exceed 80 pages).

The IDD shall document the interfaces for the following items:

MDM Flight Equivalent Unit

Lockheed Martin Video Test Set

Internal TCS Fluid I/F Test Kit

Sensor and Effector Simulator (connector definition only)

Passive Avionics Cooler (envelop only)

DDCU/RPCM Power Simulator (connector only)

Berthing Mechanism Interface Simulator (envelope only)

Hatch Restraint Fixture (pointer to MPLM ICD only)

Optical Attenuator (connector definition only)

Optical Power meter (connector definition only)

MRDL (Ethernet) Test set

Weetech Cable Tester (connector definition only)

Boeing Audio Test Set

Pressure Leak Test Kit (pointer to Hatch ICD only)

DC Power Source (20/40 KW) (pointer to MPLM ICD only)

DC Load -- PLRPC (pointer to MPLM ICD only)

Breakout box/test adapter kit (connector definition only)

HRDL Test Set

Hatch Operations Kit (Envelope definition only)

**1.20 Integrated Cargo Carrier**

OPD a. The Contractor shall provide payload accommodation services for
Flight 5A.1 transportation via Shuttle of the cargo items listed in
Table I to orbit , and return in accordance with NSTS 21000-IDD-ISS,
paragraphs 3.1.3.2.1.1, 3.1.2.1.2, 3.1.2.1.3, 3.3.1.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.5.4.1,
6.1.4, 10.7.3, 10.7.5.2.1, and 10.7.5.3.

OPD b. The equipment provided as part of the payload accommodation shall
be EVA compatible for removal of cargo items from the shuttle in
accordance with NTST-21000-IDD-ISS, paragraph 3.1.2.5.

> Table I. Cargo Item

  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------
  Flight     Cargo Item Name

  5A.1       Early Ammonia Servicer (EAS)

  5A.1       Pump and Flow Control Subsystem (PFCS)

  5A.1       Lab Cradle Assembly (LCA)

  5A.1       Power and Data Grapple Fixture (PDGF) Rigid Umbilical (RU)

  5A.1       External Stowage Platform Assembly
  ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------

OPD c. As part of payload accommodation services, the Contractor shall
provide Flight Support Equipment (FSE) that protects the Cargo items in
Table I from the Shuttle environments.

OPD d. As part of payload accommodation services, the Contractor shall
provide Flight Support Equipment (FSE) that protects the PFCS Cargo Item
from the on-orbit Space Station environments which are outside of the
Cargo items's acceptable storage and transportation envelope..

OPD e. The PFCS OSE, which stays on-orbit, shall meet all the allocated
and derived requirements of SSP 41000.

OPD f. The PFCS OSE shall be EVA compatible in accordance with SSP 41000
for installation and removal from the on-orbit Space Station.

OPD g. The Contractor shall integrate the Cargo Items with the Cargo FSE
and the combined Cargo Items and Cargo FSE with the ICC pallet and yoke
equipment to make the Integrated Cargo Carrier (ICC).

OPD h. For Contractor provided equipment, the Contractor shall supply
the support equipment required for flight hardware assembly, handling,
and checkout.

OPD i. The Contractor shall provide Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL)
mock-ups of the ICC and any Contractor-provided attach hardware,
including contractor-provided payload Flight Support Equipment (FSE) for
NBL testing.

OPD j. The Contractor shall perform an EVA Worksite Analysis of the
Flight 5A.1 ICC and provide the ICC EVA worksite analysis report to the
government in contractor format within 90 days after completing the
analysis.

OPD k. The Contractor shall perform physical integration to the ICC and
check-out of all manifested cargo items at a Contractor provided
facility.

OPD l. The Contractor shall perform hazard analysis in accordance with
DR SM02 and FMEA CIL in accordance with DR SM04 for the External Stowage
Platform Assembly. For all the FSE, a safety analysis shall be performed
in accordance with DR SM02 and a FMEA CIL shall be provided in
contractor format.

OPD m. The Contractor shall design, develop, manufacture, and deliver
On-Orbit support Equipment (OSE) which consists of an External Stowage
Platform Assembly that provides the following:

1)  Interface between the PFCS FSE to the USL trunnion pin.

2)  Transfer of power from Node 1 across the USL to the external stowage
    platform assembly.

3)  Installable by EVA.

4)  Meets the allocated and derived requirements of SSP 41000.

OPD n. The Contractor shall generate a development specification for the
External Stowage Platform (ESP). The specification will specify design
and acceptance requirements as applicable to level 3 non-complex
hardware in accordance with DR VE07.

OPD o. The Contractor shall prepare a control drawing for the PFCS FSE.
This drawing will specify design and acceptance requirements as
applicable in accordance with DR PC05.

OPD p. The Contractor shall perform modifications necessary to the EAS
to allow integration of the EAS with the EAS FSE and ICC.

**1.20.1.1 EVA/EVR Training Support**

I&O The Contractor shall support the Government in crew training and
training hardware provisioning for EVA and EVR activities.

2.  **Suit Performance Checkout Equipment Workmanship and Anomaly
    Resolution Test**

DDT&EThe Contractor shall develop, plan, and execute testing to
determine the cause of Power Supply Assembly anomalies in the Airlock.

The Contractor shall provide support in obtaining power and data
collection, by developing test procedures, preparing test plans, safety
analyses, and performing testing and fit checks, as follows:

1)  Install final configuration of SPCE battery charger parameters.

2)  Perform functional check of charge initiation and discharge
    capability.

3)  Perform fit check of crew lock stowage bags.

4)  Perform fit check of EMU umbilicals to umbilical panel.

5)  Inspect battery stowage assembly battery connectors.

6)  Update airlock "standard out" software load (REV1) to include PR
    17100 patch, and provide verification of RS-485 serial data from the
    Battery Charger Assembly to MDM.

**1.20.1.3 Crew Office Engineering and Operations Activities**

I&O The Contractor shall provide Engineering support to NASA/JSC,
CB/Astronaut Office to perform Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA)
engineering, operations and integration activities.

2.  **Lab Cradle Assembly Thermal Cover**

OPD The Contractor shall provide a Lab Cradle Assembly (LCA) thermal
cover in accordance with SSP 50492.

3.  **External Stowage Platform System Testing**

OPD The Contractor shall perform Universal Trunnion Attachment
System/External Stowage Platform (UTAS/ESP) modal testing to validate
the integrated ESPS math model.

**1.21 NBL Test Support**

OPD The Contractor shall develop design drawings to fabricate
low-fidelity mockups to support Attached Payload Keel Trunnion Envelope
Testing and EVA and EVR crew training activities in the NBL.

**1.22 Phase 3 Launch-to-Activation Analysis (LTA)**

I&O The Contractor shall perform LTA thermal analyses of the Contractor
hardware and the Contractor Cargo Elements on ISS Flights 8A, 9A, 11A,
12A, 12A.1, 13A, and 15A.

23. **Modification Kits**

    1.  **Modification Kit Documentation**

DD&E For modification kits, the Contractor shall provide modification
package acceptance data packages in accordance with DR PC18, time
compliance technical instructions in accordance with DR PC19, and
modification kit unique engineering drawings and associated list in
accordance with DR PC20.

.

24. **MDM Obsolete Component Procurement**

Spares The Contractor shall procurement Flight and Flight Equivalent
Unit MDM parts which have become obsolete.

25. **IVA Fit Checks for Flights 5A and 7A**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support to the Government for conduct
of IVA fit checks at KSC for flights 5A and 7A.

26. **ICM**

I&O The Contractor shall perform the following tasks to support
integration of the ICM to the ISS:

1.  Develop and perform the integrated ICM planning, implementation,
    reporting, and compliance per ICM Integration Plan.

2.  Support development of NASA MOD operations products.

3.  Provide support to the safety effort which includes Phase III Safety
    Review support and support to MSFC in validating NRL Safety Data.

4.  Provide engineering support for resolution of ICM interface and
    requirements issue. Support shall include preparation of high level
    plans and schedules, and providing technical assistance as required.

5.  Support the development of ISS software functional, interface and
    data requirements.

6.  Preserve data products developed in support of ICM integration tasks
    upon NASA direction to conclude support to an ICM mission.

I&O **1.27 Operations Engineering Support**

I&O **1.27.1 Software**

I&O The contractor shall develop, test, verify, and deliver software
modifications and requirements to include software configuration
management for documents and software code. All post DD250 flight
software modifications will be developed and delivered in accordance
with SSP 41170, Configuration Management Requirements, as data per DR
SE-02. Also included is support for integration of simulations within
the Mission Build Facility (MBF).

I&O **1.27.2 Command and Data Handling (CD&H)**

I&O The contractor shall maintain and operate MDM and MATE hardware and
software required to support ISS flight software deve3lopment and
operations engineering activities.

I&O **1.27.3 Flight Support**

I&O The contractor shall provide C&DH and software mission support
including the configuration and operation of SDIL facility assets to
enable flight following of mission activities.

I&O **1.27.4 Reserved**

> **1.28 United States Propulsion System (USPS)**

I&O The Contractor shall perform the following talks to support USPS RFP
development:

1\. Perform assessments and trade studies as required to determine
impacts to other ISS elements to determine ISS/USPS integration
requirements.

2\. Procure SSMDMs, MATEs, and spares.

**1.29 ORU Spares to Orbit**

I&O The Contractor shall provide analysis and technical support to the
Government for managing ORU transportation to/from orbit and on-orbit
storage.

**1.30 Engineering Analysis of ISS Extravehicular Cables and
Connectors**

I&O a. The Contractor shall identify and provide listings of all copper
Extravehicular (EV) cables and connectors.

I&O b. The Contractor shall analyze and document selected cables for
criticality, vulnerability, RAM Direction Susceptibility, accessibility
for trouble-shooting and maintenance, and identify cable/connector
component spares and quantities.

**1.31 ISS Cross Wire Jumper Cable for Flight 6A**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, fabricate and deliver for the
USL two flight Cross Wire Jumper Cables for Flight 6A to interface with
the LAS 5 Lab rack and the W3222 P1 cable.

**1.32 Fluid Line Anchor Patch Torque Testing**

I&O The Contractor shall support additional tests (Human Thermal Vacuum,
Thermal Vacuum, and Neutral Buoyancy) to evaluate the ability to achieve
an effective seal with the Fluid Line Anchor Patch (FLAP) when used in
conjunction with the Pistol Grip EVA Tool and its torque tolerance
capabilities.

**1.33 Design and Fabrication of Beta Gimbal Assembly Thermal Blankets**

OPD a. The Contractor shall design and deliver EVA thermal blanket to
minimize the cyclic thermal gradients across the Beta Gimbal Assembly
(BGA) on-orbit.

OPD b. The Contractor shall design and deliver EVA-compatible BFA ORU
Blanket Mod Kits for PVM P4, PVM S4 and PVM S6.

**1.34 S0 Module to Truss Structure Strut Deployment Test**

I&O The contractor shall plan, prepare, implement, and conduct 1-G tests
on the deployment of the S0 Module to Truss Structure (MTS) and Lab
interface. Independent tests shall be performed on the MTS Strut
Tripod-Port Group and the Port and Starboard flight Bipod strut groups
using the S0 STA. The Contractor will use the residual assets from the
EVA Human Thermal Vacuum MTS Tripod Deployment Test Stand to conduct the
S0 STA MTS Tripod Strut test if supportive to test requirements. The
Contractor shall include necessary test aids and end effectors to
simulate the USL interface with the MTS Struts. The Contractor shall
perform additional component quality/workmanship testing at KSC of the
flight components, and quantitative demonstration of MTS Strut group
maneuverability and Functionality during deployment.

**1.35 Flight ULF-1 Assembly Critical Spares**

OPD a. The Contractor shall integrate the Battery Charge Discharge Unit
(BCDU), Utility Transfer Assembly (UTA), and Flex Hose Rotary Coupler
(FHR), ORUs onto the Flight ULF-1 manifest.

OPD b. The Contractor shall perform the analysis required for
integration of the ULF-1 assembly critical spares to the Airlock based
External Stowage Platform to the on-orbit ISS.

OPD c. The Contractor shall provide the OSE and FSE required to
integrate the ULF-1 assembly critical spares onto the Airlock based
External Stowage Platform and the Platform to the on-orbit ISS.

OPD d. The Contractor shall provide mission products and data to support
cargo analytical integration, ISS and Shuttle programs for Integration
Planning, Operations reviews, Compatibility, and to assess Flight ULF-1
and 12A.1analytical results. The Contractor provider shall also provide
support to project development and design reviews, Neutral Buoyancy
Laboratory test and evaluation, cargo processing at integrator facility,
program meetings, program reviews, ISS and Shuttle reviews specifically
for ESP2, and Flight ULF-1 real time mission operations.

OPD e. The Contractor shall provide to ESP2 cargo integrators the
support to assess Flight ULF-1 analytical results. The Contractor shall
also provide support to cargo prcessing at integrator facility, program
review, data inputs for mission products and data inputs in support of
ESP2.

**1.36 Flights 9A through 11A EVA Removable Multi-layer Insulation
Covers**

OPD a. The Contractor shall design, fabricate and install EVA removable
Multi-Layer Insulation (MLI) covers on ISS segments in Flights 9A
through 11A for ORUs on the Radiator Beam Valve Module (RBVM) and
Assembly Contingency Radio Frequency Group (ACRFG).

OPD b. The Contractor shall perform follow-up analysis to support final
definition of final EVA timeline and MOD activities including thermal
analysis, EVA worksite and operations analysis for MLI blanket
installation and removal.

**1.37 Development of Wireless Video System Video Stanchion Support
Assembly FSE**

OPD The Contractor shall design, develop, manufacture, and deliver to
the Government, Flight Support Equipment (FSE) to launch the Wireless
Video System (WVS) Video Stanchion Support Assembly (VSSA).

> **1.38 Functional Equivalent Unit Enhanced MDM Solid State Mass Memory
> Upgrade**

OPD The Contractor shall upgrade 25 Functional Equivalent Unit (FEU)
Enhanced MDMs that are used for ground testing, with solid state Mass
Memory Units (MMU) in place of the existing rotational drive Mass
Storage Device (MSD) units and provide an additional 12 solid state
memory cards.

**1.39 Pump Package Assembly Acoustic Drawings for Improvement Kit**

OPD The Contractor shall design, and deliver drawings for two Pump
Package Assembly Acoustic Improvement Kits to the Government for USL
(on-orbit) installation.

**2.0 Sustaining Engineering**

[]{.mark}

I&O The contractor shall manage and integrate the contractor and
subcontractor sustaining engineering efforts. Interface and integration
support with the Space Shuttle Program, International Partners and
Participants, and other NASA organizations will also be provided. The
contractor shall provide design engineering expertise for contractor
designed hardware/software system integration expertise for the ISS
vehicle and the ARIS.

**2.1 Design Engineering Expertise**

I&O a) The contractor shall provide design engineering expertise for
contractor hardware and software installed on the orbiting vehicle, or
in ground facilities, including support equipment maintained by the
contractor. The contractor shall provide support to all sites and
organizations (including the International Partners and Participants),
that have contractor designed hardware/software.

I&O b) The contractor shall provide design engineering expertise for the
following specific non-common MPLM hardware:

> Part Number B40481, Depressurization Assembly
>
> Part Number B40482-3, IMV Shut-Off Valve
>
> Part Number B40483-1, Negative Pressure Relief Valve
>
> Part Number B40484-1, Positive Pressure Relief Valve
>
> Part Number SV819591-2 Cabin Fan Assembly
>
> Part Number SV822093-1, Total Pressure Sensor
>
> Part Number C11949-1, Sampling Line Shut-Off Valve

I&O c) The contractor shall provide design engineering expertise to
logistics for ORU repair and maintenance, ORU repair transition from OEM
to depots or new facilities, and on-orbit maintenance planning and
procedural development.

**2.1.1 -- Flight Operations Support**

I&O a) The contractor shall provide technical leadership in the Mission
Evaluation Room (MER), monitoring of real-time operations, anomaly
identification and resolution, analysis and trending of on-orbit vehicle
performance, response to chits and other program actions, and on-call
support for mission operations outside of standard business hours.

I&O b) The contractor shall provide MER personnel readiness by providing
training on standard MER procedures and processes (including tools such
as DVIS, MEWS, RATS, RTPLOT and the IFI Database), reviewing console
readiness, and improving processes where possible.

I&O c) The contractor shall provide and maintain flight-by-flight SE
planning for each mission in accordance with DR MS01, Flight Specific
Mission Support Data.

I&O d) The contractor shall review and provide comments to operations
procedures, documents, and data files.

**2.1.2 -- Anomaly Resolution**

I&O The contractor shall investigate failures and anomalies and perform
hardware/software and ISS system anomaly resolution. Anomaly resolution
entails identifying anomalies, solving them, and documenting the
results.

**2.1.3 -- Analytical Tools/Models**

I&O The contractor shall provide and maintain analytical tools/models.
The contractor shall maintain these models, generate updates based upon
added stage hardware and software correlation with measured performance
and trend analyses of the ISS, and ISS hardware and software
modifications.

**2.2 -- Engineering Analysis**

I&O a) The contractor shall provide analysis and integration of the ISS
System. The ISS system includes United States On-Orbit Segment (USOS),
IPs, GFE, ISS ground systems, and the ISS external interfaces, which
includes the ISS/National Space Transportation System (NSTS) and the
ISS/payloads interfaces but does not penetrate beyond the interface into
the Space Shuttle or payloads.

I&O b) The contractor shall provide analysis of ISS System Performance
and document as described in DR VE23, ISS System and Vehicle Subsystems
Analyses and Analytical Models. The contractor shall include recommended
changes to flight operations command and control, procedure updates,
planning updates, planning inputs, vehicle design, and/or system
hardware or software modifications. The contractor shall compare
expected performance data with on-orbit performance data to analyze
system performance and identify anomalies. Expected performance data
shall be derived from system development analyses and test results,
increment analysis results and when available, from previous on-orbit
system performance data.

**2.2.1 -- Final Acceptance Review Support**

I&O The Contractor shall provide support during the verification and
sell-off of the International Partner (IP) Participant hardware via
VCN/Quality Reviews for the Node 2, Cupola and Columbus.

**2.3 -- Drawings, Documentation, and Databases**

I&O The contractor shall maintain the program engineering documentation,
databases, and VMDB data to support the vehicle. The contractor shall
develop and maintain 3D CAD Models.

**2.4 -- Facilities and Support Equipment**

I&O The contractor shall maintain contractor and subcontractor
facilities and equipment required for Sustaining Engineering, including
the maintenance of laboratories, NBL test hardware, and test beds in a
standby mode.

**2.5 -- ISS/Shuttle Integration/De-integration**

I&O The contractor shall support the Kennedy Space Center
integration/de-integration activities for performing modification kit
installation, element closeout, pad and launch operations, hardware
assembly and test, and coordination/issue resolution. This includes
performing hands on work for those critical/unique tasks that require
specific contractor expertise and/or knowledge.

**2.6 -- Hardware History Retrieval System (HHRS)**

I&O The contractor shall provide management and implementation of a HHRS
to provide a repository of data required by ISS to support anomaly
resolution. The contractor shall provide scanning, indexing, and data
loading of applicable International Space Station flight
hardware/software build paper. HHRS applicable data is comprised of
build data (such as fabrication, assembly, repair, and rework orders),
test and analysis data, acceptance data packages, shipping documents,
receiving and inspection reports, and non-conformances (such as waivers,
deviations,

discrepancy reports, and corrective actions) for Boeing, Boeing supplier
hardware, and GFE flight hardware and software. The contractor shall
scan/index data provided by NASA for IP and GFE hardware. The contractor
shall provide maintenance for the government furnished HHRS equipment.

**2.7 -- Critical Skill/Design Knowledge Capture**

I&O The contractor shall implement a critical skill retention and design
knowledge capture system. Design Knowledge information shall be
documented on a website accessible by NASA.

**2.8 -- On-orbit Configuration**

I&O The contractor shall maintain the on-orbit configuration of the
vehicle for Prime delivered hardware and software.

**2.9 -- Special Studies, Tests and Analysis**

I&O The contractor shall perform studies, tests and analysis as
necessitate by ground and on-orbit operations, issues, anomalies and
planning requirements

[]{.mark}

**2.10 -- Asset Disposition**

I&O The contractor shall determine the assets required to support the
sustaining engineering phase of the ISS Program.

**3.0 Post Production Support**

I&O The Post Production Support (PPS) effort provides logistics support
for all Contractor provided core ISS hardware and includes the
maintenance and repair of failed hardware and replenishment/procurement
of spares and repair parts. The contractor shall manage and integrate
the contractor and subcontractor PPS efforts. This includes providing
support to all sites and organizations that may have Contractor designed
hardware/software. Interface support and integration with the Space
Shuttle Program, International Partners and Participants, and other NASA
organizations will also be provided.

The contractor shall provide implement and sustain a post production
support system for on-orbit ground logistics operations and services in
support of Contractor provided hardware and NASA specified Government
provided hardware and non-Government supplied support equipment turned
over to and maintained by the contractor. The Contractor shall maintain
the Post Production Support Plan (LOG01).

**3.1 Requirements**

**I&O 3.1.1 Logistics Engineering (LE)**

a)  The contractor shall define ISS Supportability Requirements,
    Performance Assessment Requirements, and ISS Maintenance, Spares and
    Support Equipment requirements. The contractor shall provide
    obsolescence planning and analysis, update Logistics Support
    Analysis Records (LSARs), and generate Indentured Parts Lists (IPLs)
    in LSARs for program hardware. The contractor shall provide MER
    operational support, problem resolution support and program
    integration. The contractor shall develop procedures and associated
    source data for off nominal, on-orbit system repairs and repair
    strategies for program hardware. The contractor shall provide
    expertise for depot retention/ transition decisions, System Problem
    Resolution Teams (SPRTs), and preparation of Maintenance Action
    Requests (MARs) and Time Compliance Technical Instructions (TCTIs).

b\) The contractor shall provide assessment of ground ORU supportability
in accordance with DR LS03, ISS ORU Ground Supportability Assessment
Report. The contractor shall provide assessment of major events that
effect real-time space station supportability in accordance with DR
LS04, ISS On-Orbit Logistics Supportability Assessment Flight Addendum
Report. The contractor shall provide assessment of resources and
requirements for the maintenance of the International Space Station to
determine if it can be logistically supported as designed, in accordance
with DR LS05, ISS On-Orbit Logistics Supportability Assessment Report.

**I&O 3.1.2 Material Management (MM)**

a\) The contractor shall provide program visibility into hardware
availability, hardware location, loans, transfers, and sparing
requirements. The contractor shall also manage on-orbit hardware
tracking. The contractor shall support property management including
management of the ISS program assets in accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations and program requirements and assist with
periodic inventory audits. Covered items are:

> OSE (including GFE items)
>
> FSE (including GFE items)
>
> ORUs (including GFE items)
>
> SRUs (including GFE SRUs)

b\) The contractor shall provide technical expertise for reviews and
audits of hardware packaging requirements. The contractor shall provide
technical expertise for the movement of oversize Structural Test
Articles (STAs).

c\) The contractor shall provide technical expertise to the Hardware
Utilization Board (HUB) meetings. The contractor shall (a) dispositon
residual assets and manage the overall residual asset process, (b) input
data into the residual assets database, (c) evaluate Inventory Schedule
B, SF Form 1429, (d) evaluate deliverables required by the Subcontractor
Data Requirements List (SDRL), and (e) process asset retention requests.

**I&O 3.1.3 Depot Maintenance and Repair (DM&R)**

a\) The contractor shall perform long term maintenance and repair depot
evaluation and selection, transition ORU support from Original Equipment
Manufacturer (OEM) to the depot, provide for continued maintenance and
repair support at the OEMs, coordinate equipment and data capture
activities, and provide ORU repair/modification administration.

b)  The contractor shall place subcontracts with the OEMs and depots and
    manage the overall transition process as the ORU repair
    responsibility is moved from the OEM to the selected depot.

c\) The contractor shall provide maintenance and repair of failed
hardware and replenishment/procurement of spares and repair parts for
hardware. The contractor shall implement a repair and modification
function for problem resolution, and coordination of approach and the
repair or modification of ORUs. The contractor shall implement these
activities to support rapid transition of repair capability and actual
repairs of ORUs at subcontractors and depots.

**I&O 3.2 Planning and Reporting**

a\) The contractor shall analyze requirements, plan, implement, sustain
operations, and maintain the Logistics Information Systems (LIS). The
contractor shall perform the implementation services required to
integrate non-prime hardware into the GOLD, Eagle, Citrix and TACTRAC
systems. The contractor shall provide systems administration and
maintenance for users of the GOLD, Eagle, Citrix and TACTRAC systems.

b\) The contractor shall provide access to technical data, including
repair procurements and post-repair data, inventory status, repair cycle
reports, and maintenance plans and manuals referenced in the Integrated
Logistics Support Plan (DRD OP04)

**I&O 4.0 Multi-Element Integrated Testing (MEIT) Support**

The contractor shall provide technical expertise for element integrated
testing, including software releases, test requirement definition, and
procedures development, review, and validation, test dry runs, test
execution, support test equipment, and problem/anomaly resolution.

######## 

**Space Station Engineering Support**

**Level of Effort**

**Statement of Work**

**[INTRODUCTION]{.underline}**

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the work to be accomplished in
support of Exhibit D Functions. The Exhibit D Functions are: Sustaining
Engineering, Multi-Element Integrated Testing, Post-Production Support,
and Other Engineering Support. The contractor shall provide Level of
Effort (LOE) support in accordance with this statement of work. The LOE
hours are addressed in Section B, Clause B.15.

**[GENERAL SCOPE]{.underline}**

The tasks described below are examples of LOE activities to be performed
under this SOW and are not all inclusive. The contractor shall perform
program and business management tasks necessary to support this SOW.
Contractor personnel may be made available to support new/additional
Program requirements. Any work provided under this SOW Exhibit will be
authorized through the issuance of task orders in accordance with the
task order procedures set forth in Section G, Clause G.16, Task Ordering
Procedure.

Effective October 1, 2000, the following tasks are transferred to
Exhibit A, Integration and Operations:

-   Business Management

-   Technical Definition

-   Launch Package/Stage Management

-   Software (including MEIT)

-   Avionics Support to Software

-   Configuration Management Support of Software

-   Safety and Mission Assurance Support to Software

**[SECTION I - SUSTAINING ENGINEERING]{.underline}**

**1.0 GENERAL SCOPE**

This Statement of Work (SOW) section defines the tasks and data
requirement deliveries that are to be performed by the contractor in
support of Sustaining Engineering (SE). Sustaining Engineering is
applicable to contractor hardware and software installed, or destined
for installation, on the orbiting vehicle, or in ground facilities,
including support equipment maintained by the contractor. The
contractor's support shall include the performance, management, and
integration of the contractor's and subcontractor's efforts. Interface
support with the Space Shuttle Program, International Partners and
Participants, and other NASA organizations will also be provided.

In addition, the contractor shall provide support to all sites and
organizations (including the International Partners and Participants)
that may have contractor designed hardware/software.

**2.0 DEFINITION**

Sustaining Engineering (SE) is defined as the design engineering support
provided after the development of hardware/software items is completed
and these items have been provisionally accepted. SE includes the
pre-delivery planning and preparation work required to ensure efficient
implementation and includes such tasks as test bed/facility requirements
identification, maintaining facility readiness, critical skill
retention, process definition, mission support training, model and tool
development, etc. Maintenance and modification of provisionally accepted
software products is also included.

**3.0 TASKS**

a.  The contractor shall provide planning, preparation, and design
    engineering expertise to the ISS program prior to delivery for
    contractor-developed hardware/software as follows:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Develop and maintain the Sustaining Engineering Plan (DR SE-01).

2.  Provide and maintain flight-by-flight SE planning for each mission.

3.  Conduct NASA-approved trade studies.

4.  Conduct NASA-approved contingency analysis and develop
    documentation.

5.  Provide analytical tools/models.

6.  Support Mission-specific training.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
b.  The contractor shall develop and provide hardware/software
    requirements definition and appropriate design engineering in
    support of NASA requested hardware/software modifications.

c.  The contractor shall provide analysis and integration of ISS System
    as identified below. The ISS system includes United States On-Orbit
    Segment (USOS), IPs, GFE, ISS ground systems, and the ISS external
    interfaces, which includes the ISS/National Space Transportation
    System (NSTS) and the ISS/payloads interfaces but does not penetrate
    beyond the interface into the Space Shuttle or payloads.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Provide analysis of ISS System Performance.

2.  Investigate ISS System failures and anomalies.

3.  Assess enhancements or modifications (hardware/software).

4.  Support the Mission Evaluation Room (MER) and provide mission
    support.

5.  Review MOD procedures/documents/data files.

6.  Perform hardware/software anomaly resolution and provide maintenance
    action

recommendations.

d.  The contractor shall support Kennedy Space Center
    integration/de-integration activities. This includes performing
    hands on work, when requested by NASA, for those critical/unique
    tasks that require specific contractor expertise and/or knowledge.

e.  The contractor shall maintain a Safety and Mission Assurance
    program.

f.  The contractor shall develop, test, verify, and deliver software
    modifications and requirements to include software configuration
    management for documents and software code.

g.  All post DD250 flight software modifications will be developed and
    delivered as deliverable data in the following manner:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Post-DD250 software modifications requiring complete recompiles and
    application

    software releases be delivered, in accordance with SSP 41170,
    Configuration Management Requirements, as data per DR SE-02; and

2.  Software modifications which may be accomplished as a patch will be
    delivered, in

> accordance with SSP 41170, as data per DR SE-02. Initial development
> of SE software releases and associated simulations may start prior to
> DD250 of the DDT&E baselined product (NCS, CCS, etc.) with NASA
> approval. Also included is support for integration of simulations
> within the Mission Build Facility (MBF) as approved by NASA.

######## 

g.  The contractor shall provide Program Management for all tasks as
    follows:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Support Program/NASA Reviews/Boards/Panels, including readiness
    statements.

2.  Maintain essential facilities and support equipment.

3.  Maintain critical skills and design knowledge capture.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
h.  The contractor shall provide support for Configuration and Data
    Management. This includes implementation of a Hardware History
    Retrieval system (HHRS) to provide a repository of data required by
    Sustaining Engineering to support anomaly resolution and includes
    scanning and indexing of Boeing, GFE, IP, and supplier data.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
i.  The contractor shall provide design engineering support to Logistics
    and Maintenance activities as follows:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Provide support to ORU repair and maintenance.

2.  Provide support for ORU repair transition from OEM to the depots or
    new repair

> Vendors facilities.

3.  Provide support for on-orbit maintenance planning and procedural
    development.

**4.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS (DR's)**

The following DR's are applicable to this section of the Exhibit D SOW
and are located in attachment J-4, Data Requirements:

a.  SE01, Sustaining Engineering Implementation Plan

b.  SE02, Software Application/Patches/Pre-Positioned Loads Data Package

c.  PC09, Monthly Actuals and Forecast Report

d.  PC10, Exhibit D Detailed Cost Reporting

e.  PC11, Equivalent Persons Reporting

**[SECTION II - MULTI-ELEMENT INTEGRATED TESTING]{.underline}**

**I.0 GENERAL SCOPE**

The contractor shall provide support to NASA at field and plant
locations to accomplish the support of the Multi-Element Integrated
Testing (MEIT) effort.

**2.0 DESCRIPTION**

Multi-Element Integrated Testing (MEIT) provides element to element and
Orbiter to cargo element testing. MEIT of the flight elements will occur
prior to launch in order to mitigate on-orbit risk and prove flight
interface capabilities.

**3.0 TASKS**

a.  The contractor shall participate as a member of the Integrated Test
    Requirements Group (ITRG) and the MEIT Mission Processing Team
    (MMPT).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
b.  The contractor shall support general MEIT test planning and the
    implementation/execution phases of MEIT including regression
    testing.

c.  The contractor shall provide ISS contractor related hardware,
    software and systems engineering expertise as follows:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Review NASA developed requirements and test procedures;

2.  Assess NASA established test configurations;

3.  Provide engineering insight to the test conduct and execution for
    MEIT;

4.  Provide contractor Mission Operations Payload Manager, Integration
    Engineer and

> Operations Lead during powered-up testing; and

5.  Assist NASA in the dry run of NASA generated Operations and
    Maintenance

> Instructions (OMI) procedures.

d.  The contractor shall develop, supply, operate and maintain a
    selected subset of non-deliverable Test Support Equipment per the
    task order deliverable items sheets (DIS).

e.  Provide USOS related Safety and Mission Assurance (S&MA) expertise
    as follows:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Provide safety assessments of contractor provided support equipment;
    and

2.  Support NASA KSC safety in Integrated O&SHA analysis.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
f.  The contractor shall perform Z1/P6 primary power testing.

g.  The contractor shall perform MT/S0 interface testing requiring MT
    translation.

h.  The contractor shall support troubleshooting, including analysis,
    resolution, reverification, and closure of Problem Reports (PRs)
    identified during MEIT.

i.  The contractor shall make available the Integrated Software
    Integration Laboratory (ISIL) for purposes of dry running OMI
    procedures.

j.  The contractor shall support the inclusion of payloads utilized
    during MEIT.

k.  The contractor shall maintain configuration control of contractor
    provided hardware/software during MEIT.

**4.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS (DR's)**

The following DR's are applicable to this section of the Exhibit D SOW
and are located in attachment J-4, Data Requirements:

a.  PC09, Monthly Actuals and Forecast Report

b.  PC10, Exhibit D Detailed Cost Reporting

c.  PC11, Equivalent Persons Reporting

**[SECTION III - LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE (L&M) POST PRODUCTION
SUPPORT]{.underline}**

####### I.0 GENERAL SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) section defines the tasks and data
requirement deliveries that are to be performed by the contractor for
Post-Production Support (PPS). The contractor shall provide all L&M PPS
resources/

management necessary to support PPS tasks and functions. This support
includes planning prior to DD250, planning for and implementation of L&M
PPS for on-orbit and ground logistics operations and services in support
of contractor flight hardware. This includes providing support to all
sites and organizations that may have contractor designed
hardware/software. The L&M PPS effort includes performance, management,
integration and functions associated with an operational logistics
program for ISS contractor developed/delivered hardware and for other
hardware when authorized by NASA. In addition, integration and interface
support with the Space Shuttle Program, International Partners and
Participants and other NASA Organizations/contractors will be required.
The L&M PPS functions described herein are applicable to contractor
developed/delivered hardware, any non-Government supplied support
equipment turned over to and maintained by the contractor, and for other
hardware when authorized by NASA.

####### 2.0 DEFINITION

The PPS effort provides logistics support for all contractor provided
core ISS hardware. It includes the maintenance and repair of failed
hardware and replenishment/procurement of spares and repair parts for
all hardware.

####### 3.0 TASKS

a.  Update and implement the Post-Production Support Plan.

b.  Integrate L&M PPS plans, policies, procedures, memorandums of
    understanding and agreements and other applicable documentation
    between the Prime contractor and its development sites.

c.  Maintain ISS hardware turned over to the contractor in a flight
    readiness condition.

d.  Provide access to contractor data, including repair procurements and
    post-repair data, inventory status, repair cycle reports, and
    maintenance plans and manuals.

e.  Provide support to the ISS Hardware History Retrieval System (HHRS).

f.  Provide support for Logistics Source Data Documentation (SD&D)
    updates for modifications and minor operational requirements.

g.  Provide data to support Sustaining Engineering Analysis of failure
    ISS Flight hardware, which may include Logistics Engineering
    Analysis data.

h.  Provide support to on-orbit maintenance activities as outlined in
    the PPS Support Plan.

i.  Manage and improve upon current ISS obsolescence management program
    initiatives.

j.  Consolidate and manage the ISS inventory management systems for
    input of critical on-orbit and ground inventory data and maintenance
    data collection.

k.  Maintain critical skills/facilities/support equipment for repair.

l.  Support necessary Mission Operations Directorate (MOD) reviews and
    ISS Program panels/boards/reviews.

m.  Provide Management and Integration (M&I), Logistics Engineering
    (L&E), Material Management (MM) and Depot Maintenance & Repair
    (DM&R).

n.  Perform planning and begin integration of non-prime hardware
    logistics support into the existing support for prime contractor
    hardware.

####### 

**4.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS (DR's)**

The following DR's are applicable to this section of the Exhibit D SOW
and are located in attachment J-4, Data Requirements:

a.  LOG01, Post-Production Support Plan

b.  PC09, Monthly Actuals and Forecast Report

c.  PC10, Exhibit D Detailed Cost Reporting

d.  PC11, Equivalent Persons Reporting

## 

## 

## SECTION IV -- TECHNICAL DEFINITION OF CONTRACT CHANGES

**1.0 GENERAL SCOPE**

This section provides for technical definition effort after April 1,
1999.

**2.0 DEFINITION**

a.  Technical definition of contract changes is the activity that
    entails contractor performance of pre-proposal activities associated
    with change processing and development of the Space Station Change
    Memorandums (SSCMs), Contract Task Orders (CTOs), Provisioning Item
    Orders (PIOs), and Program Provisioning documentation.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
b.  Technical definition is complete as soon as one of the following
    occurs.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  The contracting officer authorizes implementation through issuance
    of a contract change order (CCO) or by a contracting officers (CO)
    letter. Any further effort is provided during proposal preparation;
    or

2.  The completed Exhibit D CTO is authorized; or

3.  The completed SSCM or the Exhibit D Contract Task Order (CTO), PIOs
    or the Program Provision documentation is canceled/disapproved.

**3.0 TASKS**

a.  Achievement of a technical solution to any program issue that is
    expected to result in a change to the contract action, based on an
    assessment performed (including initial ROM) by an appropriate
    change screening forum;

b.  Drafting of the language to revise specifications and other
    technical documents that will be affected by implementing the
    technical solution ("from-to" language);

c.  Accomplishing pre-proposal fact-finding activities with NASA,
    including review of labor/material estimates,

d.  Performing trade studies necessary for down selection to a final
    solution or for determination of whether a change is necessary;

e.  Preparation of the change package, which includes, as required, the
    following:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
1.  Development of the Change Request (CR) and Program release of a SSCM

    documents that specify the exact nature of the change and serve as
    the "governing requirements documents;"

2.  Development of the draft "from-to" language that revises affected
    documents;

3.  Development of proposal and change implementation schedules;

4.  Definition of work content at WBS level 2 (or lower);

5.  Exhibit D CTO package preparation, coordination, and submittal to
    NASA;

6.  Program Provision documentation, coordination, and submittal to NASA

7.  PIO review, coordination, and preparation of rough order of
    magnitude (ROM) estimate or NTE (if \$1M or greater); and

8.  Preparation of rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimate, basis of
    estimate (BOE),

> or not to exceed fee (if \$1M or greater).

**4.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS (DR's)**

The following DR's are applicable to this section of the Exhibit D SOW
and are located in attachment J-4, Data Requirements:

a.  PC09, Monthly Actuals and Forecast Report

b.  PC-10, Exhibit D Detailed Cost Reporting

c.  PC-11, Equivalent Persons Reporting

###### SECTION V -- OTHER ENGINEERING SUPPORT

**1.0 GENERAL SCOPE**

This Statement of Work (SOW) section is for the accomplishment of level
of effort activities for other engineering support as will be described
in CTO and in program approved Directives.

**2.0 DEFINITION**

The effort provides level of effort management, technical and
administrative support to NASA for the management and performance of
activities necessary to develop, certify, launch, assemble, operate, and
maintain the ISS incidental to hardware and software deliveries.

**3.0 TASKS**

Tasks will be defined in the Contract Task Orders.

**4.0 DATA REQUIREMENTS (DR's)**

a.  PC09, Monthly Actuals and Forecast Report

b.  PC10, Exhibit D Detailed Cost Reporting

c.  PC11, Equivalent Persons Reporting