BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
**§3.316 Claims based on chronic effects of exposure to mustard gas.**

\(a\) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, exposure to
the specified vesicant agents during active military service under the
circumstances described below together with the subsequent development
of any of the indicated conditions is sufficient to establish service
connection for that condition:

\(1\) Full-body exposure to nitrogen or sulfur mustard during active
military service together with the subsequent development of chronic
conjunctivitis, keratitis, corneal opacities, scar formation, or the
following cancers: Nasopharyngeal; laryngeal; lung (except
mesothelioma); or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

\(2\) Full-body exposure to nitrogen or sulfur mustard or Lewisite
during active military service together with the subsequent development
of a chronic form of laryngitis, bronchitis, emphysema, asthma or
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

\(3\) Full-body exposure to nitrogen mustard during active military
service together with the subsequent development of acute nonlymphocytic
leukemia.

\(b\) Service connection will not be established under this section if
the claimed condition is due to the veteran's own willful misconduct
(See §3.301(c)) or there is affirmative evidence that establishes a
nonservice-related supervening condition or event as the cause of the
claimed condition (See §3.303).

\[57 FR 33877, July 31, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 42499, Aug. 18, 1994\]

**Supplement *highlights* reference:** 12(8)
CONFIDENTIAL MEETING SUMMARY

Center for Substance Abuse Treatment

National Advisory Council

September 7, 2005

1:00 - 3:00 p.m.

1 Choke Cherry Road

Conference Room 5-1048

Rockville, Maryland 20857

The Center for Substance Abuse Treatment National Advisory Council (CSAT
NAC) met in closed session to review summary statements for applications
received in response to CSAT=s FY 2001 funding announcements that were
scored by initial review groups (IRGs). This was the 30^th^ meeting of
the CSAT NAC.

**Federal Staff Attendees:** Dr. Westley Clark, CSAT Director, chaired
the meeting. Mr. George Gilbert, Acting Deputy Director, and Ms. Cynthia
Graham assisted. CSAT program and policy staff and SAMHSA review and
grants management staff were represented.

**Council Member Attendees:** Andrea Amprey, Andrea Barthwell, Louis
Baxter, Martin Iguchi, Lisa Mojer-Torres, Mayra Rodriguez-Howard, Pamela
Thurman, Hershell Warren, and Connie Weisner. \[Peter Edelman and Hope
Taft were unable to attend.\]

Dr. Clark opened the meeting with a roll call of NAC members and self
introductions by Federal staff attendees. He thanked the Council members
for their assistance with the important grant application review
process. Ms. Cynthia Graham summarized the role of Council members in
the review process and explained the confidentiality and conflict of
interest (COI) requirements. She instructed the members to return or
shred the summary statements they had reviewed and explained that they
needed to send her their conflict of interest statements, but that mail
ballots would not be required because individual votes would be
recorded.

The following grant/cooperative agreement programs were reviewed. The
NAC's recommendation on each bloc of applications under the program is
provided.

**[(1) RFA TI 05-003 - ATCE @]{.underline}**

-   summary statements were reviewed

-   Barthwell was recused because of a potential COI

-   members did not need to discuss the bloc or an individual summary
    statement

-   all members present concurred with the IRG's recommendations

**[(2) RFA TI 05-00 -- Afamily and Juvenile Treatment Drug
Courts@]{.underline}**

-   20 summary statements were reviewed

-   Myra Rodriguez-Howard was recused because of a potential COI

-   members did not need to discuss the bloc or an individual summary
    statement

-   all members present concurred with the IRG=s recommendations

Dr. Clark closed the meeting by thanking the NAC members for their
participation. He said he would see them at the upcoming September
14-15, 2005, Council meeting.

[09/14/05]{.underline}
[/s/\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}
Date H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., CAS, FASAM

Chair, CSAT National Advisory Council

Director

SAMHSA/Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
# APPROVAL OF ORGANIZATION CERTIFICATE

# AND

# CERTIFICATION OF INSURANCE

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C.
1751 et. Seq.), the foregoing organization certificate and insurance of
member accounts of       Federal Credit Union are approved this

(day)      

(month)      

(year)      

> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
>
> CHAIRMAN
>
> NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
## Tube Bending Trials for Prototype ATLAS Upgrade Stave

### Annealing

Aluminum 3003 tubing ID/OD(8/8.7 mm) is used and hand annealed using a
heat gun.

![](media/image1.jpeg){width="2.2527777777777778in"
height="1.6895833333333334in"}

### Bending

![](media/image2.jpeg){width="1.6548611111111111in"
height="1.2409722222222221in"}

![](media/image3.jpeg){width="1.6208333333333333in"
height="1.2159722222222222in"}

![](media/image4.jpeg){width="1.6208333333333333in"
height="1.2159722222222222in"}

### Flattening

![](media/image5.jpeg){width="1.6548611111111111in"
height="1.2409722222222221in"}

![](media/image6.jpeg){width="1.6548611111111111in"
height="1.2409722222222221in"}

Shim size is 0.284"

### Results

After flattening.

  ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------------- ---------------
  Sample        Anneal        Bead Filled?  Thickness(inches)   Width(inches)
                T(^o^F)                                         

  1             850           yes           0.292-0.295         0.368-0.371

  2             1030          yes           0.292-0.294         0.365-0.374

  3             1000          no            0.287-0.291         0.367-0.385

  4             850           no            0.287-0.289         0.365-0.385
  ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------------- ---------------
**City of Fort Worth - Shelters for Hurricane Rita evacuees**

(Fort Worth, Texas) \... Fort Worth will join other Texas cities in

providing shelter space as needed to support Hurricane Rita operations.

Space for a total of 1,700 Rita evacuees is currently available

throughout Tarrant County. Three of these shelters are located in Fort

Worth. However, due to the ongoing activities to shelter Katrina

survivors, the Fort Worth shelters will only be activated if shelters in

other cities reach capacity.

The following shelters will be available for Rita evacuees in Fort

Worth:

\* Riverside Community Center, 3700 E. Belknap St.

\* Southwest Community Center, 6300 Welch Ave.

\* Diamond Hill Community Center, 1701 NE 37th St.

Once Tarrant County shelters reach capacity, travelers will be notified

via Texas Department of Transportation highway signs.

Fort Worth officials are initiating emergency procedures to prepare for

any severe weather associated with Hurricane Rita. City workers are

preparing low-lying, flood prone areas by staging barricades and sand

bags.

Preparedness for residents:

Prepare now by making a family emergency plan:

\* Know what to do if family members are not together during inclement

weather. Also, know how to stay in contact if separated. Keep in mind

that phones may not work during a large-scale emergency. Also, have a

meeting place if you do get separated.

\* Pick a safe place in your home or apartment where family members can

gather during severe weather. This should be a place where there are no

windows, skylights or glass doors.

\* Have emergency supplies ready to go, in case you need to leave

quickly. This should include water, food, clothes and medical and other

supplies.

\* Don\'t forget to think about your pets.

\* Make sure your car\'s gas tank is filled, just in case you have to

leave quickly.

If severe weather is imminent:

\* Prepare for electrical outages. Make sure you have a battery-operated

radio and flashlight. Have a cooler of ice on hand to chill food.

\* Listen for official instructions through the media.

\* Shut windows securely and brace outside doors.

\* If you are caught outdoors and hear the emergency sirens, take
shelter

in a substantial, permanent structure. Avoid trees.

\* If you are driving in heavy rain, pull over safely and turn on the

emergency flashers until it is safe to continue. Do not stop under

highway underpasses. Never attempt to drive through flooded areas.

\* Seek shelter immediately.

\* Don\'t use charcoal to cook indoors and don\'t use portable
generators

indoors.

\* Be extremely careful with candles, they should be used only as a last

resort. Never leave candles unattended.
**United States Department of the Interior\
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE\
Fort Donelson National Battlefield\
PO Box 434\
Dover, Tennessee 37058**

**Phone (931)232-5706 ext 104**

**Fax (931) 232-4085\
**

**TRUNK RESERVATION FORM**

**Teacher:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**School Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Address:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**State: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Zip: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Phone No: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Fax.
No : \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_**

**E-mail: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Principal's
Signature: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Please Reserve:**

**Underground Railroad Trunk \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Confederate Trunk
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Sarah's Journey: Life on the Civil War Home Front
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**US Soldier Trunk \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ US Sailor Trunk
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**For These Dates (please choose at least four):**

**#1 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ #2 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ #3
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ #4 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**You will receive a confirmation of the dates that has been chosen for
your classroom. Please keep in mind that other schools are waiting to
use these trunks. Trunks are usually loaned for two-week periods (this
allows time for shipping the trunks back to the park). If you have
questions, please contact Deborah Austin or Susan Hawkins at 931
232-5706 ext 103 or 104**

**How did you hear about the trunks? A) Web site \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ B)
Newspaper \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**C) another teacher or contact \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ D) Park interpreter
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**
I strongly believe that our forests should be viewed as limited
resources. Our use of those resources should be constrained by the need
to keep all forests, and their wildlife inhabitants, and the waters that
they embrace, healthy for the foreseeable future. The commercial value
of resources within theses forest lands should be understood as
secondary to the long-range health of the forests per se, even if that
means that we humans must make changes in our way of life to adjust to a
more limited stock of forest-based resources.
![](media/image1.png){width="1.5555555555555556in"
height="1.0694444444444444in"}For more information contact:

**E. J. Stapler 706-546-2165 (during duty hours)**

**706-549-4194 (after hours)**

Rural Development

[News Release]{.underline}

**[Rural Development drops fees for guaranteed program]{.underline}**

USDA-Rural Development is dropping both the finance and refinance
transaction fees for the guaranteed rural housing program until further
notice. The purchase loan fee has been lowered from 2 to 1.5 percent,
and the refinance fee has dropped from 2 to .5 percent.

\"This is very good news for our existing guaranteed borrowers and
potential new homeowners,\" said Joe Walden, program director of the
USDA-Rural Development housing program in Georgia. \"In fact, some of
our direct home borrowers may be ready to take advantage of this
program, as well.\"

Over 6,300 Georgians have taken advantage of USDA-Rural Development\'s
guaranteed housing program since it\'s inception 11 years ago. Under the
guaranteed program, moderate income families can save Private Mortgage
Insurance (P.M.I.) because Rural Development can guarantee up to 90% of
the loan. P.M.I. is normally required by lenders to protect them and
homebuyers generally pay 2 percent of the cost of the house spread over
monthly payments. The fee under the Rural Development program is a
one-time fee and can be rolled into the home loan.

The guaranteed home loan program has many advantages, including: no loan
limit; no downpayment required; no up front closing costs; and no
minimum credit score required for creditworthiness. Families must not
exceed the income limits for their counties. A list can be found at:
*[http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/ga/grhincom.htm.]{.underline}*

Anyone interested in learning more about USDA - Rural Development
housing programs can call 706-546-2169 for more information.

Georgia does not yet have Fiscal Year 2003 funds, but is expecting the
release of those funds from the Office of Management and Budget (O.M.B.)
very soon.

\# \# \#
WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU NETWORK CHANGE NOTIFICATION

FILED BY BELLSOUTH

**Report No. NCD-1294 August 2, 2006**

Re: NETWORK CHANGE CERTIFICATION RECEIVED

BellSouth, an incumbent local exchange carrier (LEC), has filed
certification that public notice of network change has been provided
through its publicly accessible Internet site, as required by section
51.329(a) of the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
*See* 47 C.F.R. § 51.329(a). Specific network change information can be
obtained on the Internet
at:[**http://interconnection.bellsouth.com/**](http://interconnection.bellsouth.com/)

The incumbent LEC\'s certification refers to the changes shown below.

  ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
  **Number**              **Type of Change**      **Location of Change**

  20060121 Revision       Replace Copper          Lawrenceburg, TN
  20040104                Facilities with Fiber   
                          Optic Cable and Digital 
                          Loop Carrier Systems    

  20060122 Revision       Replace Copper          Greer, SC
  20060055                Facilities with Fiber   
                          Optic Cable and Digital 
                          Loop Carrier Systems    
  ----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------

The network change identified herein shall not be implemented within six
months of the date it was filed with the Commission. *See* 47 C.F.R. §
51.331.

Incumbent LEC contact:

Steven D. Long

Assistant Manager/Federal Regulatory

BellSouth D.C., Inc.

1133-21^st^ Street, N.W., Suite 900

Washington, DC 20036-3351 Phone: (202) 463-4107

The original filing is available for inspection and copying at the FCC
Public Reference Room, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Suite CY‑A257,
Washington, DC 20554.

For further information, contact Carmell Weathers, (202) 418-2325
(voice), or
[**carmell.weathers@fcc.gov**](mailto:carmell.weathers@fcc.gov) (email),
of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. The TTY
number is (202) 418-0484. **-FCC-**
Statement of Work for Nanomedicine Workshops

[Background:]{.underline} The National Institutes of Health will hold
two 2-day meetings on nanoscience, nanotechnology, and nanomedicine
during the summer of 2006 and winter of 2007. The workshops will be
sponsored by the NIH Roadmap Nanomedicine Project Team. Dr. Jeff Schloss
of NHGRI and Dr. Richard Fisher of NEI will take the lead in
coordinating the workshops, with substantial participation by other
members of the project team. Attendees at each of the meetings will
include approximately 30 experts in the field plus a smaller number of
NIH staff. The workshops will have different (partially overlapping)
attendees. Locations have not yet been determined, but it is likely that
the workshops will be held in the Washington, DC metropolitan area.

[Scope of work:]{.underline} The contractor will provide a range of
support services under this task order. These services will include the
following for *each* of the workshops. These services will include:

● Securing meeting space at the site (room for 40+ attendees including
the experts and approximately 15 NIH staff).

● Securing a hotel room block for approximately 30 out of town guests

● Make arrangements for all refreshment breaks (am, pm, possibly box
lunches paid for by attendees)

● Making travel and lodging arrangements for all out of town
participants; to include any travel by air, train, rental car, or mixed
mode. Travelers will contact the contractor directly. The Nanomedicine
Project team will provide a list of attendees for whom travel is
authorized

● Creation of name badges and possibly meeting folders/materials

● Providing one personnel member to attend the meeting to handle the
on-site registration desk, any last minute travel changes, as well as
make ground transportation arrangements for return to airports etc.

● Reimburse travelers for all expenses incurred during travel to this
meeting (including lodging and meals) according to federal government
regulations. All travel reimbursements must be paid within two weeks of
receiving the traveler's voucher

● Additional tasks may be added to this order at a later date, as the
initiator deems necessary
MESSAGE NO: 6345204 DATE: 12/11/2006

CATEGORY: CVD TYPE: INI

REFERENCE: REFERENCE DATE:

CASES: C-560-821

PERIOD COVERED: 11/27/2006

LIQ SUSPENSION DATE:

TO: DIRECTORS OF FIELD OPERATIONS, PORT DIRECTORS

FROM: DIRECTOR, SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT

RE: INITIATION OF COUNTERVAILING DUTY INVESTIGATION OF, COATED FREE
SHEET PAPER FROM INDONESIA (C-560-821)

1\. ON NOVEMBER 27, 2006, THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PUBLISHED

IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ITS INITIATION OF COATED FREE SHEET

PAPER FROM INDONESIA (71 FR 68546).

2\. THE MERCHANDISE COVERED BY THIS INVESTIGATION INCLUDES

COATED FREE SHEET PAPER AND PAPERBOARD OF A KIND USED FOR

WRITING, PRINTING OR OTHER GRAPHIC PURPOSES. COATED FREE

SHEET

PAPER IS PRODUCED FROM NOT-MORE-THAN 10 PERCENT BY WEIGHT

MECHANICAL OR COMBINED CHEMICAL/MECHANICAL FIBERS. COATED

FREE

SHEET PAPER IS COATED WITH KAOLIN (CHINA CLAY) OR OTHER

INORGANIC SUBSTANCES, WITH OR WITHOUT A BINDER, AND WITH NO

OTHER COATING. COATED FREE SHEET PAPER MAY BE

SURFACE-COLORED,

SURFACE-DECORATED, PRINTED (EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED BELOW),

EMBOSSED, OR PERFORATED. THE SUBJECT MERCHANDISE INCLUDES

SINGLE AND DOUBLE-SIDE-COATED FREE SHEET PAPER; COATED FREE

SHEET PAPER IN BOTH SHEET OR ROLL FORM; AND IS INCLUSIVE OF

ALL

WEIGHTS, BRIGHTNESS LEVELS, AND FINISHES. THE TERMS \"WOOD

FREE\"

OR \"ART\" PAPER MAY ALSO BE USED TO DESCRIBE THE IMPORTED

PRODUCT.

EXCLUDED FROM THE SCOPE ARE:

\(1\) COATED FREE SHEET PAPER THAT IS IMPORTED PRINTED WITH

FINAL

CONTENT PRINTED TEXT OR GRAPHICS;

\(2\) BASE PAPER TO BE SENSITIZED FOR USE IN PHOTOGRAPHY; AND

\(3\) PAPER CONTAINING BY WEIGHT 25 PERCENT OR MORE COTTON

FIBER.

COATED FREE SHEET PAPER IS CLASSIFIABLE UNDER SUBHEADINGS

4810.13.1900, 4810.13.2010, 4810.13.2090, 4810.13.5000,

4810.13.7040, 4810.14.1900, 4810.14.2010, 4810.14.2090,

4810.14.5000, 4810.14.7040, 4810.19.1900, 4810.19.2010, AND

4810.19.2090 OF THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE OF THE UNITED

STATES (HTSUS). WHILE HTSUS SUBHEADINGS ARE PROVIDED FOR

CONVENIENCE AND CUSTOMS PURPOSES, THE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF

THE

SCOPE OF THESE INVESTIGATIONS IS DISPOSITIVE.

3\. FOR FURTHER REPORTING PURPOSES THIS CASE HAS BEEN ASSIGNED

INVESTIGATION NUMBER C-560-821.

4\. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER BY CBP

OFFICERS, THE IMPORTING PUBLIC OR INTERESTED PARTIES, PLEASE

CONTACT DAVINA HASHMI OR RON TRENTHAM AT OFFICE OF AD/CVD

OPERATIONS, IMPORT ADMINISTRATION, INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, AT (202) 482-0984

OR (202) 482-3577 RESPECTIVELY (GENERATED BY O6:GC).

5\. THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE RELEASE OF THIS

INFORMATION.

CATHY SAUCEDA
**FIRE Diagnostics: Publication and Presentations**

27 January 2004

**Publications:**

\[1\] K.M. Young, Proceedings of the 19th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion
Engineering (2002) 192.

\[2\] K.M. Young, Rev. Sci. Instrum., **74**, 1761 (2002).

\[3\] R.L.Boivin, T. Casper and K.M. Young, Proceedings of the H-mode
Workshop (San Diego, Sept. 2003).

**Presentations** (in addition to those published above):

\[4\] R.A. Ellis III, K.M. Young, \"FIRE Diagnostics Overview\", FIRE
Engineering Meeting, Princeton, NJ, March 1999.

\[5\] K.M. Young, \" FIRE Diagnostics\", Workshop on Physics Issues for
FIRE, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A., May 2000.

\[6\] K.M. Young, \" FIRE Diagnostics\", IEA-3 Large Tokamak Workshop 46
on \'Diagnostics for Burning Plasma Experiments\', Naka, Japan,
September 2000.

\[7\] K.M. Young, \"Diagnostics for FIRE\", KSTAR Diagnostics Meeting,
Taejon, Korea, November 2000.

\[8\] K.M. Young, \" Diagnostics for Burning Plasma Physics Studies: a
Status Report\", UFA Workshop on Burning Plasma Sciences, Austin, TX,
U.S.A., December 2000.

\[9\] K.M. Young, \"Diagnostics for FIRE\", NSO PAC Meeting #2,
Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., January 2001.

\[10\] K.M. Young, \"Diagnostics Issues for FIRE\", NSO PAC Meeting #3,
Madison, WI, U.S.A., July 2001.

\[11\] K.M. Young, \"FIRE and its Diagnostics: a Status Report\", 1st
ITPA Topical Group Meeting on Diagnostics, St. Petersburg, Russia,
November 2001.

\[12\] K.M. Young, \"FIRE Diagnostics: an Update\", 2nd ITPA Topical
Group Meeting on Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, U.S.A., March 2002.

\[13\] K.M. Young, \"FIRE Diagnostics (Snowmass)\", Snowmass Workshop,
Snowmass, CO, U.S.A., July 2002.

\[14\] K.M. Young, \"FIRE Diagnostics\", Poster at Snowmass Workshop,
Snowmass, CO, U.S.A., July 2002.

\[15\] K.M. Young, \"FIRE Diagnostics: Update\", 3rd ITPA Topical Group
Meeting on Diagnostics, Toki, Japan, September 2002.

\[16\] K.M. Young, \"Diagnostics - Issues, Status and Plans and Port
Assignments\", FIRE Engineering Meeting, Princeton, NJ, November 2002.

\[17\] K.M. Young, \"Update on FIRE Diagnostics\", 4th ITPA Topical
Group Meeting on Diagnostics, Padua, Italy, February 2003.
**Use of Department of Defense, Public Health Service**

**or Other Federal Hospitals**

**§17.50 Use of Department of Defense, Public Health Service or other
Federal hospitals with beds allocated to the Department of Veterans
Affairs.**

Hospital facilities operated by the Department of Defense or the Public
Health Service (or any other agency of the United States Government) may
be used for the care of Department of Veterans Affairs patients pursuant
to agreements between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the
department or agency operating the facility. When such an agreement has
been entered into and a bed allocation for Department of Veterans
Affairs patients has been provided for in a specific hospital covered by
the agreement, care may be authorized within the bed allocation for any
veteran eligible under 38 U.S.C. 1710 or 38 CFR 17.44. Care in a Federal
facility not operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, however,
shall not be authorized for any military retiree whose sole basis for
eligibility is under §17.46b, or, except in Alaska and Hawaii, for any
retiree of the uniformed services suffering from a chronic disability
whose entitlement is under §17.46b, §17.47(b)(2) or §17.47(c)(2)
regardless of whether he or she may have dual eligibility under other
provisions of §17.47.

\[39 FR 1842, Jan. 15, 1974, as amended at 45 FR 6936, Jan. 31, 1980, as
amended at 61 FR 21966, May 13, 1996\]
"Other Support" Results

For the Modular Grant Evaluation Study, questions about "Other Support"
pages were tailored to each of four specific stakeholder groups. NIH
Program and Grants Management staff, Scientific Review Administrators
(SRAs), principal investigators (PIs), and peer reviewers, were asked
questions on the survey about "Other Support" issues that had been
raised during survey development focus group discussions. Findings from
these "Other Support" questions are outlined below.

-   When asked about their experiences with the modular grant
    application process, 61.1% of Program and Grants Management staff
    agreed that since there are no "Other Support" pages, time is spent
    trying to find out this type of information.

-   Survey items on the PI, peer reviewer, and SRA surveys asked about
    whether peer reviewers are able to assess the scientific merit of a
    modular grant application without "Other Support" pages. Only 57.5%
    of SRAs felt that peer reviewers could assess the scientific merit
    of a modular grant application without "Other Support" pages and
    only 62.0% of peer reviewers thought they could assess the
    scientific merit without "Other Support" pages. Note that this is in
    contrast to 79.3% of SRAs and 86.7% of peer reviewers that indicated
    peer reviewers are able to assess the scientific merit of a modular
    grant application without a detailed budget.

-   PIs were more optimistic about peer reviewers' ability to review
    modular grant applications without "Other Support" pages. Almost
    three quarters (73.2%) agreed that peer reviewers were able to
    assess the scientific merit of a modular grant application without
    "Other Support" pages. Interestingly, when the PI respondents were
    broken out into awardees and non-awardees, a higher percentage
    (76.6%) of non-awardees than awardees (71.7%) felt that peer
    reviewers could assess the scientific merit without "Other Support"
    pages.

-   Principal investigators were also asked how strongly they agreed
    with the statement, "The reason I have proposed research projects
    that stay within the \$250,000 limit for a modular grant is because
    I don't have to provide the "Other Support" pages. Although many
    disagreed (44.3%), over one quarter (26.2%) reported that not having
    to provide "Other Support" pages is one of the reasons for choosing
    the modular format.

-   Finally, more than half (51.5%) of all PIs thought that preparing a
    modular grant application saves time because the "Other Support"
    pages don't have to be filled out.
PUBLIC NOTICE![](media/image1.png){width="0.6541666666666667in"
height="0.6604166666666667in"}

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12TH STREET, S.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 **DA 00-2051**

News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet:
http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov

**Released: September 8, 2000**

# WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU APPROVES dismissal

# OF Petition for reconsideration and Request for Reinstatement

On November 22, 1999, Metrocall USA, Inc. (Metrocall) filed a Petition
for Reconsideration and Request for Reinstatement *Nunc Pro Tunc*
(Petition for Reconsideration) of an Order released on October 21, 1999,
which dismissed Metrocall's application (FCC File No. D085958) to
construct and operate private carrier paging facilities on the 929.3875
MHz frequency in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Metrocall USA, Inc., *Order*,
15 FCC Rcd 8331 (Wir. Bur. 1999).

By letter dated August 30, 2000, Metrocall requested dismissal of its
Petition for Reconsideration, noting that "Metrocall was successful in
bidding on the \[Major Trading Area\] including Allentown, Pennsylvania
in the Paging Auction, rendering the Petition for Reconsideration moot."

The Policy and Rules Branch of the Commercial Wireless Division has
reviewed and hereby approves Metrocall's request to dismiss its Petition
for Reconsideration.

Action by the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless
Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.

For further information, contact Evan C. Baranoff at (202) 418-7142,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy
and Rules Branch.
Michael Flynn

Ames Research Center

The International Space Station (ISS) represents the current
state-or-the-art in spacecraft atmospheric control. The ISS system uses
high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters to remove particulate
matter from the cabin atmosphere. Current requirements are for the
atmosphere to be controlled below 0.05 mg/m3 for particulates ranging in
size from 0.5 µm to 100 µm. These requirements are derived from a 1987,
panels recommendations on airborne particulate matter in spacecraft
(NASA Conference Publication 2499). In the years since selection of the
ISS system several new technologies have emerged that may have
applicability for spacecraft use. They are inertial collection devices,
electrostatic precipitation filters, and magnetically assisted
filtration.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

> OFFICE HFZ-300
>
> \(301\) 594-4692 OF Lillian J. Gill, Director
>
> FAX (301) 594-4610 COMPLIANCE Wally Pellerite, Assistant to the
> Director
>
> Casper Uldriks, Special Assistant
>
> DIRECTOR Chester T. Reynolds, Public Health Advisor
>
> HFZ-301
>
> DEPUTY DIRECTOR Philip J. Frappaolo, Deputy Director

PROMOTION AND HFZ-302

ADVERTISING Byron Tart, Director

POLICY STAFF (301) 594-4639

Fax (301) 594-4609

DIVISION OF DIVISION OF DIVISION OF DIVISION OF DIVISION OF

PROGRAM HFZ-305 BIORESEARCH HFZ-310 ENFORCEMENT HFZ-320 ENFORCEMENT
HFZ-330 ENFORCEMENT HFZ-340

OPERATIONS MONITORING I II III

\(301\) 594-4699 (301) 594-4718 (301) 594-4586 (301) 594-4611 (301)
594-4646

FAX (301) 594-4715 FAX (301) 594-4731 FAX (301) 594-4636 FAX (301)
594-4638 FAX (301) 594-4672

Karen Moss, Director Charma Konnor, Director Adrianne Galdi, Director
Steve Niedelman, Director Larry Spears, Director

Wes Morgenstern, Dep. Dir. Reva Melton, Dep. Dir. James Woods, Dep. Dir.
Gladys Rodriguez, Dep. Dir.

Louis Kaufman, Andrea Latish, Karen Stutsman,

Case Expert Case Expert Case Expert

Field Program InVitro Dental, ENT Cardiovascular &

Programs HFZ-306 Enforcement HFZ-311 Diagnostic HFZ-321 and Ophthalmic
HFZ-331 Neurological HFZ-341

Branch Branch I Devices Branch Devices Branch Devices Branch

\(301\) 594-4695 (301) 594-4720 (240) 276-0165 (301) 594-4613 (301)
594-4648

Marje Hoban, Chief Dave Kalins, Chief Betty Collins, Chief Eric Latish,
Chief Don Serra, Chief

Information Program Diagnostic Ob/Gyn, Gastro, & Electronic

Processing & HFZ-307 Enforcement HFZ-312 Devices HFZ-322 Urology Devices
HFZ-332 Product Devices HFZ-342

Office Auto Br Branch II Branch Branch Branch

\(301\) 827-4555 (301) 594-4723 (301) 594-4591 (301) 594-4616 (301)
594-4654

Fax (301) 827-5192

Gene Sullinger, Chief Viola Sellman, Chief Tom Jakub, Chief Tim Wells,
Chief Collin Figueroa, Chief

General Surgery General Hospital Orthopedic, Phys.

Devices HFZ---323 Devices HFZ-333 Med., & Anes. HFZ-343

Branch Branch Devices Branch

\(301\) 594-4588 (301) 594-4618 (301) 594-4659

George Kroehling, Chief Carolyn Niebauer, Chief Edgardo Santiago, Chief

Registration and Listing

\(301\) 495-7726

Transmittal Number C.P. 7382.845 PART VI, Page 14 03/15/00 (Collins \#
updated 11/18/05 ORA/Maroney)
MESSAGE NO: 8364207 DATE: 12/29/2008

CATEGORY: ADA TYPE: LIQ

REFERENCE: REFERENCE DATE:

CASES: A-552-803

PERIOD COVERED: 12/05/2008 TO 12/09/2008

LIQ SUSPENSION DATE:

TO: DIRECTORS OF FIELD OPERATIONS, PORT DIRECTORS

FROM: DIRECTOR, SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT

RE: GAP PERIOD LIQUIDATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ANTIDUMPING, DUTY ORDER
ON UNCOVERED INNERSPRING UNITS FROM, VIETNAM (A-552-803)

1\. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 733(d) OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930,

AS AMENDED, THE COMMERCE DEPARTMENT MAY INSTRUCT CUSTOMS AND

BORDER PROTECTION (CBP) TO SUSPEND THE LIQUIDATION OF

MERCHANDISE SUBJECT TO AN ANTIDUMPING DUTY INVESTIGATION AND

COLLECT ESTIMATED DUTIES FOR A TEMPORARY PERIOD (THE

PROVISIONAL MEASURES PERIOD). WHEN ENTRIES OF SUBJECT

MERCHANDISE CONTINUE TO BE SUSPENDED AFTER THE PROVISIONAL

MEASURES PERIOD, THE DEPARTMENT MUST INSTRUCT CBP TO TERMINATE

SUSPENSION AND LIQUIDATE WITHOUT REGARD TO ANTIDUMPING DUTIES

ON SUCH MERCHANDISE.

2\. ON 12/05/2008, THE PROVISIONAL MEASURES PERIOD FOR THE

ANTIDUMPING DUTY INVESTIGATION ON UNCOVERED INNERSPRING UNITS

FROM THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM EXPIRED. SUSPENSION OF

LIQUIDATION OF SUBJECT MERCHANDISE MAY HAVE CONTINUED ON OR

AFTER THAT DATE.

3\. ACCORDINGLY, FOR SHIPMENTS OF UNCOVERED INNERSPRING UNITS

FROM THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM, ENTERED OR WITHDRAWN

FROM WAREHOUSE FOR CONSUMPTION DURING THE PERIOD 12/05/08

THROUGH 12/09/2008, CBP SHOULD TERMINATE THE SUSPENSION OF

LIQUIDATION AND LIQUIDATE WITHOUT REGARD TO ANTIDUMPING DUTIES

(I.E., RELEASE ALL BONDS AND REFUND ALL CASH DEPOSITS).

4\. INTEREST PROVISIONS OF SECTION 778 OF THE TARIFF ACT OF

1930, AS AMENDED DO NOT APPLY.

5\. THIS INSTRUCTION CONSTITUTES NOTICE OF THE LIFTING OF

SUSPENSION OF LIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES OF SUBJECT MERCHANDISE

DURING THE PERIOD 12/05/08 THROUGH 12/09/2008.

6\. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER BY CBP

OFFICERS, THE IMPORTING PUBLIC OR INTERESTED PARTIES, PLEASE

CONTACT DAVINA HASHMI OR RON TRENTHAM AT OFFICE OF AD/CVD

OPERATIONS, IMPORT ADMINISTRATION, INTERNATIONAL TRADE

ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, AT (202) 482-0984

OR (202) 482-3577 RESPECTIVELY (GENERATED BY O8:RB).

7\. THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS ON THE RELEASE OF THIS INFORMATION.

DAVID M. GENOVESE
99-PRA-002

Maintenance Cost Savings through Divestiture

(Maine Lights Program)

**Department of Transportation**

**United States Coast Guard**

**[BEST PRACTICE AWARD WINNER]{.underline}**. The First District of the
U.S. Coast Guard owns several hundred properties in the coastal region
of the northeastern United States. A few of these properties date back
to the late 1700's. With the development of technological aids to
navigate merchant and sailing vessels, the need for lighthouse keepers
greatly diminished. Without the day-to-day upkeep from the lighthouse
keepers and other personnel, the lighthouses began to deteriorate. The
Coast Guard also became unable to maintain the properties at the
standards of the state historic preservation guidelines given the level
of funding for repairs and alterations.

In response to this situation, the Coast Guard developed the Maine
Lights Program that outleased and divested 28 historic lighthouse
properties to organizations that will ensure the maintenance, repair and
care of these historically significant properties. For their efforts,
the U.S. Coast Guard has been awarded the 1999 GSA Achievement Award for
Real Property Innovation in the Best Practice category.

In the past, these properties would be evaluated on an individual basis
for utilization. The Maine Lights Program was an effort to analyze the
utilization and oversee the disposition of these historic lighthouses,
as a whole. The Coast Guard formed a committee to select those qualified
organizations that would accept outleasing and transfer of the 28
historic lighthouse properties. Groups were judged on several categories
including non-profit status, public benefit, financial ability, and
community status. The deeds mandated that the groups repair, maintain,
and uphold the historic value of the properties, within state historic
guidelines.

This program ensures the lighthouses will maintain their historic
integrity, while at the same time allowing the Coast Guard to benefit
from the cost avoidance from the continual maintenance and repair costs
for these properties. The Coast Guard estimates that the divestiture
will save annually between \$3 to 5 million in repair and maintenance
costs.

For further information on the Maine Lights program, you may contact Mr.
Ted Dernago, Jr. at (401) 736-1748 or via e-mail at
<tdernago@ceuprovidence.uscg.mil>
**§17.904 Review and appeal process.**

For purposes of §§17.900 through 17.905, if a health care provider,
child, or representative disagrees with a determination concerning
provision of health care or with a determination concerning payment, the
person or entity may request reconsideration. Such request must be
submitted in writing (by facsimile, mail, or hand delivery) within one
year of the date of the initial determination to the Health
Administration Center (Attention: Chief, Benefit and Provider Services).
The request must state why it is believed that the decision is in error
and must include any new and relevant information not previously
considered. Any request for reconsideration that does not identify the
reason for dispute will be returned to the sender without further
consideration. After reviewing the matter, including any relevant
supporting documentation, a benefits advisor will issue a written
determination (with a statement of findings and reasons) to the person
or entity seeking reconsideration that affirms, reverses, or modifies
the previous decision. If the person or entity seeking reconsideration
is still dissatisfied, within 90 days of the date of the decision he or
she may submit in writing (by facsimile, mail, or hand delivery) to the
Health Administration Center (Attention: Director) a request for review
by the Director, Health Administration Center. The Director will review
the claim and any relevant supporting documentation and issue a decision
in writing (with a statement of findings and reasons) that affirms,
reverses, or modifies the previous decision. An appeal under this
section would be considered as filed at the time it was delivered to the
VA or at the time it was released for submission to the VA (for example,
this could be evidenced by the postmark, if mailed).

**Note to §17.904:** The final decision of the Director will inform the
claimant of further appellate rights for an appeal to the Board of
Veterans' Appeals. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101(2), 1802-1803, 1811-1813,
1821)

(The Office of Management and Budget has approved the information
collection requirements in this section under control number 2900-0578.)

\[62 FR 51284, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 1010, Jan. 8, 2003\]

**Supplement *Highlights* reference**: 13(1)
**[Washington University -- Social Aspects of Earthquake Hazards
Course]{.underline}**

The George Warren Brown School of Social Work offers one course of
interest:  (1) a variable-credit course Social Aspects of Earthquake
Hazards.  This course is being revised to an all hazards focus.

Accreditation Agency: Council on Social Work Education, Alexandria, VA
22314-3421

For further information:

> Contact: Dr. David F. Gillespie - George Warren Brown School of Social
> Work\
> Washington University\
> One Brookings Drive Campus Box 1196\
> St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899\
> Phone: (314) 935-6674\
> Fax: (314) 935-8511\
> Email: <davidfg@fidnet.com>
>
> Additional Information: Additional course materials are being
> developed for social workers.\
> \
> Additional Phone:
>
> Updated: 11/29/05
**National Irrigation Water Quality Program**\
U.S. Department of the Interior

Reconnaissance Investigation of Water Quality, Bottom Sediment, and
Biota Associated with Irrigation Drainage in the Sacramento National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, California, 1988-89. USGS Water Resources
Investigations Report 92-4036,Oct 1992. 79p, 5 fig, 17 tab, 119 ref.

Dileanis, P.D.; Sorenson, S.K.; Schwarzbach, S.E.; Maurer, T.C.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

A reconnaissance-level investigation of the effects of agricultural
drainage at five Federal wildlife refuges in the Sacramento Valley,
California, was begun in 1988. This investigation was part of a U.S.
Department of the Interior program to identify the nature and extent of
drainage related water quality problems in the Western United States.
Arsenic concentrations in water and bottom sediment appeared to be
slightly elevated compared with national and regional baselines, but did
not exceed Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for aquatic
habitat. The maximum arsenic content of mallard and heron eggs were
within the threshold effect ranges (0.03 to 3 µg/L) for trivalent and
pentavalent inorganic arsenic in chicken eggs. Mercury was detected in
bottom sediment at all sites and concentrations exceeded 0.25 µg/L at
five sites. Seven of 30 invertebrate samples and a pooled sample of
largemouth bass from Sutter National Wildlife Refuge had mercury values
greater than suggested criteria (0.05-0.01 µg/g) for the diet of other
organisms. Concentrations of selenium in eggs of herons and mallards
were just over the guidelines for no clear risk. The DDT family of
organochlorine compounds were found in fairly low concentrations (0.2 to
27 µg/kg) in all bottom sediment sampled from canals containing drain
water. The DDE concentration of white-faced ibis and black-crowned night
heron eggs was negatively correlated to eggshell thickness.
**EXHIBIT A TO SC LBR 1073-1**

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| IN RE:                            | CASE NO:                          |
|                                   |                                   |
| DEBTOR(S)                         | CHAPTER:                          |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   | # CERTIFICATION REGARDING         |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   | # RELATED OR REFILED CASES        |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

     The undersigned certifies the following pursuant to SC LBR 1073-1
and subject to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011.

     (1) There are grounds to consider the above captioned debtor
related to: (*debtor\'s(s\') name(s) and case number(s)*); or

     (2) Alternatively, the above captioned debtor has previously filed
a bankruptcy case in this District, or currently has a pending
bankruptcy case in this District, as follows: (Designate case numbers
and date of filing).

Date:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_          \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
                               Signature of Attorney/*Pro Se *Debtor\
                              
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
                               Typed Printed Name\
                              
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
                               Address/Telephone/Facsimile/E-mail\
                              
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\
                               District Court I.D. Number
The 10 WARNINGS SIGNS of Domestic Abuse

Hitting, pushing and punching are obvious signs of abuse -- but it's not
always they easy to recognize. Answer the following questions honestly
to determine whether you or someone you know is in an abusive
relationship:

1.  Is the other person in the relationship constantly putting you down,
    making you feel bad about yourself or humiliating you?

2.  Does the person treat you like a servant or make all the decisions?

3.  Are you prevented from getting or keeping a job?

4.  Do you have little access to money or sketchy knowledge about your
    family income?

5.  Does the person threaten to hurt you?

6.  Does the person threaten to commit suicide if you leave him or her?

7.  Does the person evoke fear by using looks, gestures or actions such
    as smashing things or displaying weapons?

8.  Does the person control what you do and whom you talk?

9.  Does the person often use jealousy to justify actions?

10. Does the person make light of the abuse and not take you seriously
    if you try to discuss it? Does he or she deny the abuse or shift
    responsibility for abusive behavior, saying it was your fault?

If you answered "yes" to any of these questions, you may be in an
abusive relationship. Contact your company's employee assistance program
for confidential support, or call the National Domestic Violence Hotline
at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) or TTY 1-800-787-3224.
Morphological and physiological differences among resident and coaster
brook trout juveniles, [Lindsey M. Larson]{.underline}, [Rachel R.
Holman]{.underline}, [Jesse L. Karner]{.underline}, J. B. K. Leonard\*,
Northern Michigan University, Biology Department, Marquette, MI 49855,
jileonar@nmu.edu

Migratory freshwater brook trout (*Salvelinus fontinalis*), commonly
called coasters, are a vital part of the Lake Superior watershed, but
with limited data available on their life history, it has been difficult
to classify their role within the Salmonidae family. Brook trout exhibit
highly variable life history traits within the species; there often
exist both anadromous (migrant) and nonanadromous (non-migrant or
resident) forms within a population. Lake Superior coaster brook trout
typically occupy near-shore areas at one time or another during their
lives. The mechanisms involved in the determination of migration or
residency are not well understood, however, morphometrics and the
metabolism of the fish likely play important roles. It is believed that
coaster brook trout exhibit changes that can be compared to smolting,
the preparation that fish undergo to survive in a saltwater environment
prior to leaving a freshwater stream. Some metabolic patterns and
morphological traits can be indicative of the smolting process in
coaster strains. Four strains of brook trout (three coaster, one
stream-resident) were sampled once a month over four consecutive days.
Sixteen fish from each strain were sampled per day by placing eight in a
saltwater challenge tank and another eight in a freshwater tank. After
twenty four hours, the fish were prepared for measurement and tissue
sampling. Morphometrics were analyzed by principle comprehensive
analysis to assess differences between coasters and residents. Lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH), citrate synthase (CS), and pyruvate kinase (PK)
activities in liver and white muscle were measured using microplate
spectrophotometer colorimetric assays. We expect to see various
morphological differences, such as increased size and elongation of body
dimensions in coasters, as well as observed spikes of enzyme activity.
There may also be an increase in CS levels indicative of higher aerobic
capacity/activity in coaster strains. Metabolic shifts and morphological
differences may be indicators of greater tolerance to the transition
between freshwater and saltwater.
**4.2.14 Target Pile Installation Equipment**

Standard rigging equipment is used to install many of the target pile
components. The blue blocks have integral lifting handles that are
designed to work with standard equipment. All of the steel slabs are
drilled and tapped so they can be lifted with swivel hoist rings. The
concrete covers are equipped with Swift Lift anchors and can be lifted
using the matching lifting eye.

Special lifting fixtures are needed to lift green Duratek blocks
(**Figure 4.2-1**), T-blocks (**Figure 4.2-2**), the modules (**Figure
4.2-3**), and top-closure Duratek blocks (**Figure 4.2-4**). Duratek
blocks are lowered down the access shaft in a custom designed basket. A
transporter from the neutrino fixed target beam line will be used to
transport materials from the access shaft to the target hall. The
transporter is pulled and pushed using a standard, hand-operated,
electric driver. The transporter rides on rails that are welded to the
steel floor plates. The rails are removed after installation. It might
be necessary to design a coupling to connect the driver to the
transporter. A special fixture is needed to hold the work cell door on
the transporter and to install it. Special wheeled frames are used to
move the modules.

![](media/image1.wmf){width="4.3in"
height="2.9972222222222222in"}**Figure 4.2-****43** Green Duratek block
lifting fixture

![](media/image2.jpeg){width="3.0in" height="3.0in"}**Figure
4.2-****44** T-block lifting fixture

![](media/image3.png){width="5.25in" height="3.575in"}**Figure
4.2-****45** Module lifting fixture

![](media/image4.jpeg){width="5.020833333333333in"
height="3.375in"}**Figure 4.2-****46** Blue Duratek block lifting
fixture