**Appendix C**

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. R. Lee to Col. George Bomford, January 8^th^, 1824

Pittsburgh January 8^th^, 1824

Sir

I transmit to you herewith Mr. Foot's account for extra services as
acting Superintendent of the Armory at Springfield. If there is any
informality in them, I have to request that Mr. Foot may be informed
thereof & correct the error before I leave Washington.

I send you also a plan of a building intended (at present) for a
Military Store, but may very easily be converted into a work Shop should
circumstances require it. In order to have a correct idea of the
propriety of its location & dimensions, you will suppose a building of
the same size & appearance now standing on a perfectly level plain,
occupied by filers, Stockers & finishers, with a Forging Shop 1 story
130 feet long at right angles from its right flank forming an L. Then
suppose a building 60 by 30, 2 stories standing in the same line of the
first building 30 feet distance on the left, occupied for offices,
Storage materials & parts of muskets, then place the new building 30
feet distance from the latter in the same line. Take the Bellfry from
the building on the right & place it on the center building. By this
arrangement, beauty convenience & utility will be added to the
Establishment. It may not be improper to remark that in my opinion,
there is no place in the United States better calculated for the
preservation of Arms, than the location of the Armory at Springfield, on
account of the pure state of the Atmosphere.\~

I have the honor to be

Very Respectfully etc

R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Adonijah Foot to Col. George Bomford, March 3^rd^, 1824

U.S. Armory Springfield March 3^rd^, 1824

Sir

In addition to the hasty communication forwarded yesterday relative to
the fire at this Establishment, the following result of an examination
made today is respectfully submitted. The loss is estimated at from 15
to 18 thousand Dollars. . . . .

From 12 to 14 thousand rough Musket stocks were consumed. There for want
of room elsewhere were stored in the garret or upper loft of the Shops &
the fire evidently originated by a spark from the forging Shop, being
blown under [the eaves]{.underline} & in through a cornice between the
plate & the roof so as to catch upon the Stocks on the inside under the
roof & while this position prevented us from getting [at]{.underline}
the Fire in the first stage of it they served to give immediate rapidity
& intensity to the flame.\~

We hope & think we shall be able to find some room in some of the
adjacent buildings to employ the men, now thrown out of business, at
their usual branches, in a short time, should this course meet your
approbation. . . . .

A. F.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Adonijah Foot to Col. R. Lee, March 4^th^, 1824

U.S. Armory Springfield March 4^th^, 1824

Sir

Yesterday, I apprised you of the loss of our filing shop by fire. I now
give you the particulars of this most unfortunate circumstance. . . ..

We find that about every thing was saved out of the lower rooms. Nearly
all the finished Locks & Barrels, Bench vices, locks etc. was saved.
Many of the workmen escaped out of the back window the moment before the
roof fell in with a tremendous crash, but fortunately no one is severely
injured. We had just delivered the Store Keeper 1300 muskets for Feb. 7.
So that not many guns remained in the Shop. . . .. Respectfully, etc.

A. F.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. R. Lee to Col. George Bomford, March 18^th^, 1824

Pittsburgh March 18^th^, 1824

Sir

The Accounts of the fire at our Establishment have been pouring in upon
me for a week past so that I have now some 22 letters on the subject. .
. .. I cannot find words to express my regret for the disaster. . . ..
It was my intention to have exerted my influence for the creation of
another building South of the Offices, Stores & Chapel to correspond
with the Shop that is now destroyed & to occupy it for the storing of
Arms at present & have it so arranged, as to convert into a work Shop at
some future period if circumstances should require it. This building is
very much wanted. It was for the want of Store room, that compelled us
to put Gun Stocks in the garrett. We once cleared them out except a few
at the South end, but from necessity I suppose it was nearly filled
again, & they must have increased the fury of the flames & rendered it
more difficult to Stop their progress. As soon as the mind is relieved
from the weight impressed upon it by such unexpected & unpleasant news
it is naturally led to the examination of the causes which produced the
disaster, & the inquiry immediately presented is, how it might have been
prevented? The great error was in placing the building so near the
forging Shop without making it proof against fire in the first instance:
and suppose we consider it an error in the first instance to suffer it
to continue thus exposed. . . .. But whining & complaining now comes too
late. . . .. I very much wish to be in Springfield before the building
is begun. . . ..

Very Respectfully Sir

I remain etc

R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. R. Lee to Col. George Bomford, March 23^rd^, 1824

Pittsburgh March 23^rd^, 1824

Sir

Your letter of the 12^th^ Inst. is received, in which you ask my
"\[???\] & opinions" "founded upon the present situation of the affairs
at the Armory," having reference to the distribution of the work Shop --
rebuilding the same, etc. and the measures most advisable to pursue in
the present exigency. . . ..

I now proceed to give my views generally, and as much in detail as my
present means & circumstances will permit. . . .. Now, . . ., I proceed
to propose first; to sell off the entire Establishment, buildings,
Lands, Water privileges, Dams, Canals, Water, etc. (reserving Machinery
& tools) and purchase a Site on Chicopee River, three & a half mile
Northerly from the Hill, where is an excellent Site, with plenty of
Water, & where with little expense boats could approach the Armory from
Connecticut River where the works could be built permanent & in such a
manner as all such Establishments belonging to the Government ought to
be, & arranged with a view to convenience & utility. . . ..

I now proceed to the second proposition & I must beg your patience &
also your charity, for I certainly would not propose a plan that I
thought would not eventuate to the advantage of the Government. Then I
propose Secondly, to sell all the property of the Government on the Hill
& the Lower Water Shop & purchase from two to four hundred Acres of Land
adjoining the Upper Water Shop. Raise the Dam from 4 to 6 feet, create
an additional Water Shop as a substitute for the Lower Shop, then erect
the other necessary buildings, properly arranged, contiguous to the
Upper Shop. Then you will have the works pretty convenient (except the
forge & Saw Mill & they are rather of secondary consideration) the
Middle Shops being only about 80 rods distant & in fair view. . . .. . .
. I candidly confess I have not much expectation that either will be
adopted. The latter is the most probable, & I think on the whole, under
existing circumstances, it is to be preferred. But the Establishment in
the first place ought by all means to have been located on Chicopee
River. . . ..

I now come to the third proposition in which I feel rather more
confident of success.

This Supposes the Armory to remain as at present located. My object is
to change the plan of the building or buildings that are about to be
erected. The late unfortunate occurrence at Springfield, has taught us a
lesson by which we ought to receive instruction. The buildings should be
so arranged that one will not take fire from the other, & although if
the large Shop was rebuilt on its old foundation & made fire proof, it
would not probably ever take fire from the chimneys of the forging Shop,
but suppose the latter should take fire & burn down with a violent wind
driving the flames directly towards the former, I think it morally
certain that it would be destroyed also. Further, after the late
accident, I would not place a Store for the deposit of Arms in the
situation that was contemplated, for though the saving of the building
in which are the Offices & Store (commonly called the Chapel & which
stood within 30 feet of the large Shop) is an evidence that if it was
fire proof it might be preserved even if the other buildings were
burned, but such a Store filled with finished Arms, contains a property
of immense value & ought not to be placed, where it is in the least
exposed. Supposing that from 40 to 60,000 Muskets can be removed from
our Stores this Spring, we should probably be able to dispense with an
additional Arsenal for some two or three Years; And when one is put up,
a safe & convenient place will be pointed out.\~

I will now go on to exhibit my plan, which is to put up a building where
the former Shop stood 150 feet long, . . ..\~

Most respectfully Etc.

R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Col. George Bomford, July 10^th^ , 1824

U.S. Armory Springfield July 10^th^, 1824

Sir,

I wrote you a few days since & informed that we had commenced the
building of the two Shops 120 feet long by 34 feet wide. These will cost
\$14,5000 Dollars. A Store 100 feet long by 34 feet wide will cost about
\$6,500. I do not like to importune the Officers under whom I perform my
duties, & more particularly often the liberal provision that has been
made fro this Establishment the present season, but as it will be
necessary to have a Store erected soon, & it is now very much wanted &
as we are now building, with the Mortar Staging, Mortar tubs, Mortar
beds, Lime houses & other preparations in readiness, it would be a
saving of expense & much trouble if the Store could be put up this
season. Then we could level the ground & replace the fences without
having to go through the same process a second time. In making the
Estimate I have allowed \$500 on each building more than the actual
Estimate, so that if you can allow us \$21,000 for the above purpose, we
can erect & furnish the three buildings, level the ground & repair the
fences.\~

The proceeds of the Auction Sales (which took place on the 1^st^ Inst.)
will amount to more than the necessary repairs of Establishment.\~

I should like to be informed of the Amount that will be allowed for the
ordinary expenditures of the Armory for the present year, & the Sum
allotted for permanent improvements. The Store will be located agreeable
to the Fourth plan which I transmitted to you from Pittsburgh.

Very Respectfully

Sir

R. L.

P. S. Should the Store be erected, it will be necessary to remove 30,000
to 40,000 Muskets as it will take a year after the Store is built to be
sufficiently dry for storing Arms & we have now the product of a year &
a half more than we can conveniently provide room for \~

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Col. George Bomford, August 9^th^ , 1824

U.S. Armory Springfield Aug. 9^th^, 1824

Sir,

I received a letter from Col. McRee dated at Pittsburgh June 10^th^
informing me that he would meet me in Baltimore some time in July & that
he would give me notice a few days before he left Pittsburgh. . . ..

We are progressing very well with our buildings. . . .. If the Store can
be erected this Season it will cost \$400 less than it probably will at
any future time for reasons I have heretofore stated & further I can
obtain the materials & labor at a reduced price, than in a year from the
ensuing Autumn the Store will be set to receive Arms.\~

Very Respectfully

Sir R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Col. George Bomford, August 28^th^ , 1824

U.S. Armory Springfield Aug. 28^th^, 1824

Sir,

I have commenced excavating the cellar for the Store and on consulting
with Mr. Foot & Mr. Chaffee, we all agree that it would be best to have
the Store 120 feet long instead of 100 feet, and begun the cellar
agreeable to that plan. . . .. If I do not hear from you in two weeks I
will take it for granted that I may proceed to put it up 120 feet long.
This will correspond with the other buildings, make the appearance much
better & give more room for storing Arms.\~

Very Respectfully etc

I am R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Lemuel Pomeroy, Esq., October 7^th^, 1824

U.S. Armory Springfield Oct. 7^th^, 1824

Dear Sir,

Your favor of the 21^st^ ult. was duly receiver. I have received a
communication from Capt. Wade (for Col. Bomford) relative to the payment
of my expenses of reinspecting your Arms at Watervliet, in which he
says, "I rather incline to the opinion that Mr. Pomeroy should bear the
whole of this expense and that the U. States should pay only one half of
the amount of Mr. Carrington's compensation." . . ..

I remain R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Col. George Bomford, July 1^st^, 1825

U.S. Armory Springfield July 1^st^, 1825

Sir,

It becomes my painful duty to communicate the unpleasant news of another
disaster at this Establishment, by About half past eleven O'Clock last
night the forge was discovered to be on fire, and when I arrived at the
spot the whole building was in flames, & it was in vain to attempt to
save it. . . ..

Very Respectfully Sir

I am your Obt Sert

R. L.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Major William Wade, Commanding, U.S. Arsenal,
Greenleaf Point, Washington, D.C., July 15^th^, 1825

U.S. Armory Springfield July 15^th^, 1825

Dear Sir,

On reflecting on the unfortunate occurrence of the late fire & the more
destructive one of last year, the mind seeks to find some relief amidst
the painful recollections that crazed upon it, and it seems somewhat
solaced by the consideration, that on a review, nothing is found to
reproach or censure it, & it is further consoled from the belief that
thus far, these loses will or may prove an advantage to the U. States. I
am of the opinion that the burning of the large Shop in 1824, will be
nearly & perhaps quite balanced by the improved state of the works & the
saving that will be made in various ways & the additional safety &
permanency of the buildings: . . ..

I remain Dear Sir

With Esteem

Your very Obt Sert

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Major William Wade, Commanding, U.S. Arsenal,
Greenleaf Point, Washington, D.C., July 15^th^, 1825

U.S. Armory Springfield July 15^th^, 1825

Dear Sir,

On reflecting on the unfortunate occurrence of the late fire & the more
destructive one of last year, the mind seeks to find some relief amidst
the painful recollections that crazed upon it, and it seems somewhat
solaced by the consideration, that on a review, nothing is found to
reproach or censure it, & it is further consoled from the belief that
thus far, these loses will or may prove an advantage to the U. States. I
am of the opinion that the burning of the large Shop in 1824, will be
nearly & perhaps quite balanced by the improved state of the works & the
saving that will be made in various ways & the additional safety &
permanency of the buildings: . . ..

I remain Dear Sir

With Esteem

Your very Obt Sert

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Major William Wade, Commanding, U.S. Arsenal,
Greenleaf Point, Washington, D.C., Sept. 21^st^, 1825

U.S. Armory Springfield Sept. 21^st^, 1825

Dear Sir,

I have to acknowledge the receipt of your esteemed favor of the 12^th^
inst. and in reply I have to observe that I duly received Mr. Copeland's
Drawings of a Rolling Mill, which will not apply to the one I am
calculating to erect here, though some parts may be of service. . . ..

Dear Sir

Your friend and

Very Obt Sert

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Col. George Bomford, September 18^th^, 1826

U.S. Armory Springfield Sept. 18^th^, 1826

Sir,

In addition to the Ordinary Estimates for the Year 1827 I take the
liberty to propose the following. . . .. For Military Store 120 by 32
feet two Stories with Cellar (fire proof) - - \$3,000.00

The usual annual expenses (total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
180,000.00

Remarks and Explanations. . . ..

The Store I propose to locate on the Boston road between the present
Store at an equal distance from each. Our present Stores will be filled
by the first of January next, and even if you remove 20,000 Stands as
has been proposed, the Stores will be nearly filled upon the course of
next year, and as this is probably as good a place to preserve Arms as
any in the United States, I have thought proper to make the Estimate.\~

Very Respectfully Sir

I am your Obt Sert.

Recapitulation of the Estimates

Ordinary or usual Annual
Estimates - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\$180,000.00

6 Dwelling houses at
\$2500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
15000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Work Shop at Middle
Site - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\-- - - 5,000.00

Wheel and fixtures for
Do. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1,500.00

Addition to Stone flume & Iron Water Wheel at Upper Water
Shop - - - - - - - - -1,500.00

Fixtures for Rolling
Mill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[2,500.00]{.underline}

For Military
Store - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8,000.00 \$190,500.00

Total - [23,000.00]{.underline}

Grand Total or Aggregate \$213,500.00

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. Roswell Lee to Col. John E. Wool, Inspector General, Nassau, NY,
October 30^th^ , 1826

U.S. Armory Springfield Oct. 30^th^, 1826

Sir,

Your kind favor of the 25^th^ instant is received \~ I apprise you my
dear Sir that my regret in not being able to visit you is not less than
yours. . . ..

T thank you for the interest you manifest for the improvement of this
Establishment, and beg leave to refer you to an Estimate made and
transmitted to Col. Bomford on Ordnance Service in Washington dated the
18 Sept (last month) recommending certain additions and improvements
which you will find herewith enclosed. . . ..

On reflection I think it may be well to make the military Store 140 feet
long -- this would increase the expense about 1300 Dollars, and as this
would be a Center Building being placed between the other two Stores, it
would be an ornament well as convenience to add to it, a handsome
pediment. This would augment the Expense about 1000 Dollars, making the
cost of the Store \$10300.\~ . . ..

With the most sincere Respect

I remain Dear Sir, with friendly regard

And Esteem Your Mo. Obt Servant

Roswell Lee Supt.

U.S. Armory {PS over}

P.S. The Pistols you allude to . . ..

Recapitulation

Of the Estimated Expenses of "Permanent Improvements" transmitted to
Col. Geo. Bomford 18 Sept. 1826, Viz.

6 Dwelling houses at
\$2500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \-- - - - - -
-15000. 1 Work Shop at Middle Site 60 by 40 feet 2
Stories - - - - - - - - - - - \-- - - 5,000.

Wheel and fixtures for Do. - -
\-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,500.

Stone flume & Water Wheel at Upper
Shop - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,500. Fixtures for Rolling
Mill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2,500.

1 Military Store -- 120 by 40
feet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[8,000.]{.underline}

\$33,500.

Deduct Dwelling Houses - - - - - - - - - \-- - - - - - -
[15,000.]{.underline}

Remaining - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \$18,500.

Recapitulation

Of the Estimated Expenses transmitted to Col. John E. Woll, Inspector
General, 30 Oct. 1826, Viz.

6 Dwelling houses at
\$2500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-15000.

1 Work Shop at Middle Site 60 by 40
feet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9,000.

2 Stories, including Water Wheel & Fixtures

Addition to Stone Flume and Water
Wheel - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,500.

at the Upper Shops

Fixtures for Rolling
Mill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2,500.

1 Military Store 140 by 32 feet with
Pediment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[10,300.]{.underline}

38,300.

Deduct Dwelling
Houses - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[15,500.]{.underline}

23,300.

Then add Shop for Stocking
Machinery - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [3,000.]{.underline}

\$26,300.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to Col. R. Lee, May 12, 1830

Ordnance Department

Washington May 12^th^, 1830

Sir

The bill making additional appropriations, for the purchase of land, and
for erecting an arsenal at Springfield Armory, is still funding in the
Senate. But as no objections to its passage are anticipated; especially
as it has been favorably reported on by the proper Committee; it is
advisable that the plan of the building to be erected should be matured;
s that it may be commenced forth with, if the appropriation be made.

In your estimate for this building, it is described as 140 feet long,
and 34 wide, two stories high.- These dimensions, it is conceived, would
not give a well proportioned building for the purposes for which this is
designed. In submitting the estimates from this department the amount
was increased; with a view to make the building three stories high. And
instead of the dimensions stated in your estimate, it is proposed make
them 120 by 40 feet.- These will give about the same area to the floors,
as those you proposed.-

I enclose a sketch of the proposed building, for your consideration;
also notes which describe and explain its principal parts.- You will
perceive that it is proposed to store the muskets in open frames and
that that provision is made for receiving 60,000.- All so arranged that
ready access may be had to any of them, for inspection, enumeration, or
removal; and that the stairs are so disposed of as to leave the body of
the building entirely uninterrupted.

The musket frames are designed to be similar to those erected at
Watervliet; each of which contains 2,000 muskets. By placing these
frames in the center of the spaces between the columns, an immense
weight is thrown on the weakest part of the floor. To avoid this, it is
proposed to embrace the columns in the center of the frames, by which
the floor timbers will be much less strained. Large columns of wood, in
this position, would derange the plan of the frames; it is therefore
proposed to make the columns of cast iron. It is supposed that the
difference of expense between the cost of wood and iron columns, would
not be very considerable; and would not be equal to the advantages
gained, in space by the latter. And if the iron columns be extended up
through the 3^rd^ story, they will yield a permanent support for the
roof equal to that which would be furnished by a wall of masonry. Hence
a heavily timbered and expensive framed roof may be avoided.

I enclose a sketch of the iron columns, drawn to a scale of 1/6 full
size; with the parts forming the head, of full size.- The form given to
the shaft, is that of a cross. This form is preferred to that of a
cylinder as it gives a wider base, with equal weight; and is conceived
to be better adapted to the structure of the musket frame, of which it
will form a part.- The drawing represents the cap and shaft of the
column, as cast in one piece. For the convenience of moulding and
casting, it may be necessary to cast the cap separately. This may be
done, and the form of the columns, as delineated, be preserved, by the
addition of a circular moulding, or bead, at the point of division, as
represented by the penciled lines on one of the columns. The moulding to
be united with the shaft of the column, one half of it projecting above
the end would form a mortise of suitable form to receive the lower part
of the cap.- In order that the columns, and the floors above them, may
not depend on the unstable support of wood for a foundation, the casting
should pass through the floor timbers, so as to present a continuous
line of iron from the base to the roof, to the masonry pillars in the
basement.- The part passing through the timbers, should have a section
equal at least to the shaft of the column. The drawing represents this
fact, a 2 by 7 inches; and this oblong form is given to it, in order to
avoid weakening the timber through which it passes.- It is supposed that
it will be found most convenient to make this part a continuation of the
lower end of the upper column. In this case, a receptor mortise for the
reception of its lower end should be formed in the upper surface of the
cap below, on which it rests.- Wherever separate pieces of the column
meet, lead should be interposed to form an even bed.-

As the columns in the different stories, will be subjected to very
unequal pressures, a different size should be used in each story. Those
in the 3^rd^ story will sustain the roof alone; those in the 2^nd^
story, will have 20,000 muskets in addition to the roof; and those in
the first story 40,000.- The pillars, in the basement will support
60,000 muskets, besides the roof; or about 35,000 pounds on each
pillar.-

Columns of the size represented in the drawings, may be sufficient for
the first story; and I suppose they may be safely taken as quite
sufficient for those in the 2^nd^ story.- Upon the latter basis, those
in the lower story should be larger, and those for the 3^rd^ story
should be smaller than is represented. But this is a point on which no
conclusive opinion may be formed; and I desire to have your views of it
before any dimensions are determined on.-

The timbers of the musket frames, which pass through the center of them
length wise, and cross wise of the building; can not be less than 4
inches wide; and should not be more than 5 inches. This should be kept
in mind, in adjusting the dimensions of the columns; the shaft of which
should not exceed 5 inches, measured length wise of the building.- If
additional strength be required, it must be obtained by increasing the
thickness of the branches of the shaft, or by extending the width of two
of them -- leaving the other two to measure 5 inches, as now drawn.

The floor timbers, as represented in the drawing, make the principal
timbers cross the building; and the joists run length wise.- I do not
perceive that it will make any material difference whether this method
be adopted; or whether the principal timbers be made to run length wise
of the building.- It is a point however which should claim your
consideration.-

The plans now submitted with the remarks in relation to them, are given
merely as an out line of the building proposed; and not as designs
finally adopted.- I desire that you will give the matter an attentive
examination in all its details; and then communicate your opinions
thereon.- You will please also to suggest any modifications within the
general design, or in any of the details, which may occur to you as
being advantageous.- With your remarks upon the subject, you will please
transmit the papers on which the plan and elevation of the building is
drawn as no copy of it has been made; and without it, your remarks might
not be well understood.- After hearing from you, a more full and correct
plan will be prepared and transmitted to you.-

The sum, which the appropriation bill allots to this building, is
\$16,000.- And this amount should be kept in view, when maturing the
plan. For it is necessary, that whatever may be the plan of the
building, the cost of erecting it must not exceed the sum stated.-

I must observe, that nothing said in this communication, should be
considered as authorizing any contracts on account of this building to
be made. All measures which would, in any degree pledge the public
faith, must be deferred until after you shall be officially informed,
that the appropriation has been made.- As soon as the bill is acted on,
you will be informed of the result.-

Respectfully I am

Your obedient servant,

G Bomford, Lt. Col.

On Ordnance Service

Notes

Arsenal at Springfield Armory

Dimensions: 120 by 40 feet- exclusive of pediment

Three stories high exclusive of basement.-

The walls of the basement- of stone. 3 feet thick

The superstructurte of brick.

Thickness of 1^st^ story 3 bricks.- or 27 inches

" 2^nd^ " 2 ½ " or 22 ½ "

" 3^rd^ " 2 " or 18 "

Pilasters at the corners and in the rear to project ½ brick or 4 ½
inches- to be 3 feet wide.

Watertable and belting courses of dressed stone, on all sides.- Cornice
of moulded brick.-

Pediments in front; width 40 feet, projection 8 ft. Stairs to be placed
in the pediment. Steps to be 6 feet long in 1^st^ story. The stairs to
be enclosed by a brick wall. 1½ brick thick, to leave three openings;
two opposite the stair landings, and one in the middle, the latter to be
filled with glass like a window, is designed to light the center of the
room. The two formes(?) to be closed with doors, if considered
necessary.

The roof to be covered with slate. Copper gutters on the roof above the
eaves. A light balustrade, of wood, over the eaves, supported by cast
iron posts; the feet of which to serve as slates.- The drawing
represents the roof as hipped. Question. Which is preferable hipped --
or gable ends.? If the latter, it will be similar to the pediment; and
all should have parapet walls covered with capping stone.-

I have 9 windows in front, and in rear, in each story; and one in each
end. Each window to have 24 panes of glass, 4 wide & 6 high- in the
1^st^ & 2^nd^ story 9 by 12- in 3^rd^ story 9 by 11.- All made in two
sashes.- Windows in basement same width and half the height.- one sash.-

Basement story 8 feet high in clear

1^st^ & 2^nd^ stories- 11 feet " "

3^rd^ story 10 or 10 ½ ft "

To be but one entrance door, & that in the center of interior front.-

The floors to be supported by two rows of columns, eleven in each row,
making 22 columns for each story. Heavy timbers (say 12 by 16 inches) to
rest on the columns, and pass from wall to wall: if across the building,
in one piece; if length wise, in pieces united by splicing, so as to
form a continuous piece. Joists to be framed in to these pieces, upper
surfaces being even with each other.

All the floor timbers, and the underside of the floor plank, for all the
floors except the first to be planed.-

The columns to be of cast iron, of such dimensions as will weigh about
40 lb. for each foot in length. Those in the first story, to rest on
pillars of masonry in the basement. Those in the upper stories to rest
directly on those beneath: and to derive no support from wood
foundations. Broad flanges to be formed at the top of the columns, to
support a suitable resting place for the heavy timbers. The foot of the
lower columns to rest on a similar flange reversed; the latter resting
on masonry of the pillars. The ends of the columns when they meet to be
bedded in lead.-

Racks, on open frames, to be provided for receiving the arms. These are
to cross the building, and to embrace two columns each.- Each rack, will
cover a space on the floor of about 4 ½ by 26 feet; and being two
timbers high will receive each 2,000 muskets.- Ten racks to a floor,
leaves a broad open space in the center, free, for a passage; and gives
to each story 20,000 arms; or 60,000 for the building, all so arranged
that every arm may be seen; and any one may be removed, by first taking
four out of the way.

Trap doors, for a hoisting apparatus may be made in the stair. The wheel
and axle under the roof of the pediment, the endless rope passing along
the division wall, on the side opposite the stairs.-

Ordnance Dept

May 12^th^- 1830 Geo B

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, May 13^th^, 1830

Washington May 13^th^, 1830

Dear Sir

We send you a sketch for the contemplated new arsenal.- The details of
it have been very hastily thrown together and require much careful
deliberation before being finally decided on.-

There are several prominent points on which I hope you will bestow your
attention, and favor us with your views.

1^st^ The general fixtures of the exterior.

2^nd^ The general arrangement of the interior.

3^rd^ The walls,- is the thickness proposed suitable. And the materials,
stones for the basement, and brick for the superstructure, can any
change be advantageously made in these?-

4^th^ Roof- Shall it be [hipped]{.underline}; or have gable ends with
parapet walls?

5^th^ Material for covering roof. Your estimate said tin; we propose
slate. Is not the latter preferable? And why use tin?-

6^th^ Columns. What think you of substituting cast iron for wood; what
is the comparative cost; and what is your opinion of the form proposed?

7^th^ Will it be advisable to put columns in the 3^rd^ story? If carried
up they will give support to the roof; and if not the roof must be made
to support itself on the side walls.

I like the general exterior of the building, though not quite satisfied
with the hipped roof. I think the gables preferable. I would not slope
the parapet walls al the way down to the cornice; but would form a
square, above the same, on both sides of the angle, to appear like the
pilaster's continuous.- The balustrade, over the eave, should correspond
in height with these squares.

With gables you could make a garret room sufficiently capacious to
contain some five or six hundred empty gun boxes.-

The general arrangement of the interior pleases me much. It is something
new, and I think well adapted to its destined purpose.- The spectacle of
a room containing twenty thousand arms, so arranged that every one would
be visible; that any one could be taken hold of, examined, and replaced;
at pleasure; with abundance of light, and of space for passages; the
absence of any visible means by which they, or the floor above, are
supported; the order, simplicity, neatness, and magnitude of the whole;
would together, form a scene worth a journey of some miles to enjoy.- As
this is a contrivance of my own, I have perhaps overstated its merits;
if so, your unbiased judgment will set me right.- Mr. Alger, a very
skillful founder of Boston, came to the office this morning and I asked
his opinion of the cast iron columns. He says he has made many of late
for churches in Boston. He made them cylindrical, some hollow, and some
solid. The weight about the same as we propose.- He approved the form I
had given them. I enquired the price; and he says he thinks he can
deliver them at Springfield at four cents the pound. If you are asked
higher prices in your neighborhood, it will be well for you to ask
proposals from him.- Some small flanges, upon which to attach the wood
work of the frames, will be necessary about midway up the columns, and
also near the caps. These are not shown in the drawings.

If the columns be carried through the 3^rd^ story, and made to give
support to the roof; the heavy girders which sit on them should
[cross]{.underline} the building; whatever may be the direction of these
timbers in the floors below. I include a very rough sketch, not drawn to
any scale; by which a strong roof may be made with very light timbers.

The drawing does not show any break in the exterior of the basement
wall, to form a base for the pilasters. This I think, is a defect.-

What say you to a small portico to cover the entrance door.- and so
arranged that the window immediately above it, may be converted to a
door to open a parapet to the cover of it; as to a balcony? Do you
recollect the porticos we put up to the arsenals here?- They did not
cost much, and are both useful and ornamental.-

I presume the appropriation for this building will pass the Senate, as a
matter of course; since the committee has reported it without making any
objections to it. Yet it is possible that it may be passed by.- You will
see that I increased the amount of your estimate, several thousand
dollars. And I now fear that I did not add quite enough, for such a
structure as we ought to erect.- In forming your estimate of the cost of
the building, as now proposed, you will not include the cost of the
musket racks, or frames.- If the appropriation be sufficient to complete
the building, and to provide them also, very well; but if not, we must
provide some other means for making them.

I have said nothing in the notes, or elsewhere, about the means of
securing or closing the windows of the building.- Something of the kind
I suppose, is necessary for security, in the first story, at least.

How will it answer to have inside folding shutters?- The window jambs
are deep enough, I think, to receive them, if made with a single fold on
each side, that is four shutters in all.-

Iron bars I suppose, will be sufficient and suitable for the basement
windows; but these would not look well in the upper windows.- Will it be
necessary to provide shutters for the windows in the 2^nd^ and 3^rd^
stories?-

What will be the distance between this building and the adjacent store
house?- I cannot find the plans and drawings of your establishment,
which were sent to the office some years ago. And cannot imagine what
has become of them, unless you have them.- I have a faint impression of
your having taken them, for the purpose of making some alterations,
corresponding with those which have been made on the grounds since the
drawings were prepared.- If you have them, please inform me.-

If the appropriation passes, we shall have a considerable amount to
apply at Harpers Ferry for permanent improvements.- And as this was
initiated on your estimates, we should like to consult you, as to the
manner of applying it, especially as the present Superintendent is new
in the business.

Suppose you come on here, as soon as you can make arrangements for
starting your new works at Springfield; and after feeling the pulse,
concerning your proposed operations in the west; I should join you in a
visit to Harper's Ferry; to take a glance at matters and things in that
quarter.- I should like to visit that establishment; and in order that
the visit might be useful on public account, it would be necessary to
make it in company with you.- I do not propose by this; that either of
us should go there with authority to act; but merely to survey the
premises, and to interchange opinions.

yours,

W[m]{.underline}. Wade

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, June 7^th^, 1830

Dear Sir,

Drawings for your new arsenal are in hand but I fear may not be
completed so soon as is desirable. While adjusting some of the details
for the draftsman, it occurred to me that with due economy in
appropriating the interior space we might squeeze in upon our floor
25,000 muskets. I have therefore made a rough sketch, which is herewith
enclosed, showing in what manner this may be effected.

You will perceive that I have made 12 frames instead of 10 as heretofore
proposed. These will contain 24,000 muskets. To provide for the
remaining thousand I have placed small frames in the four corners of the
room each of which may be so arranged as to contain 250, in two rows, so
as not to project more than 1 foot from the end wall.- All the passages
between the frames will be a little upward of 4 feet; and the great
passage in the center will extend 10 feet.

The corner frames are designed not only for receiving the add thousand
muskets, but for improving the appearance of the room by covering the
ends of the long side passages with guns, instead of leaving a naked
wall exposed.- I think the effect on a beholder would be greatly
increased, by terminating the view from these long passages with a mass
of guns. It would give the imagination an impression of greater extent
and magnitude than if the view were cut off by a naked blank wall. To
effect this fully, the guns in one row should cover the intervals in the
other, so that the walls behind them should not be visible from the
passage.-

I have shown these corner frames in two different forms. The
[curved]{.underline} form is that which I prefer.-

The modification here suggested, will add 25 feet to the capacity of the
building for stowage without any addition to its dimensions. It will be
the same, in effect, as an addition of 30 feet to the length of the
building, at a cost of \$4,000.-

The only objection I perceive from this modification is that the whole
may appear to much crowded, and the passages be too narrow for good
taste and effect. But for all the purposes of convenience and utility; I
consider a free passage of four feet, abundantly sufficient. It will
admit of two persons walking through abreast without inconvenience.-

Do you know what is the width of the passages in the Watervliet Arsenal?
I think there are 15 spaces there, in a room about 19 feet longer than
yours. If so, the space allotted to each frame, including passages, is
about 9 feet, which will make the passages 4ft 6in each. By the
arrangement now suggested for your arsenal, we can place the columns 8ft
8 inches distant from each other; which will make the passages 4ft 2in
each, only 4 inches less than those at Watervliet. The latter you know
are obstructed by larger columns in the center of each, while yours are
entirely open and free. This contraction of four inches in width will be
amply compensated by freeing the passages of obstructions.-

I wish you would give this suggestion an early consideration, and let me
know your opinion of it without loss of time, if you write soon, I may
have your answers by the time the drawings are completed. The
proposition is, in effect, to make the building contain 75,000, instead
of 60,000 muskets without increased expense. And this is certainly and
object worthy of careful consideration.-

After making the enclosed sketch, it occurs to me that we might omit the
two columns in the center of the building; which will save the cost of 6
columns, and leave the great passage unobstructed.

On the back of the sketch you will find the positions of the several
columns stated, and the width of the spaces which this modification
would give.-

By taking out those center columns, the floor is deprived of a support
for a distance of 14ft 6 inches, measured length wise of the building;
and the distance cross wise of the building is 12 feet. The square
formed by these four columns nearest the center of the building; would
thus be 14 ½ by 12 feet. In all other parts of the floor, except this
center passage, the points of support will be in the angles of squares
measuring 8 2/3 by 12 feet. Any light timbers would serve for a floor
thus supported. The wise space in the center being designed for an open
passage would probably never have any considerable weight placed on it,
and would possess abundant strength without the aid of columns in the
center.

If it be desirable to diminish the pressure on the floors, it may be
done with convenience by throwing the weight of all the
[upper]{.underline} tiers of muskets directly upon the columns. The
timber which runs horizontally through the middle of the frames, and on
which the platform of the upper tier rests, may be supported by braces
from the lower end of the columns instead of props from the floor.- This
would transfer the whole weight of the upper tier from the floor to the
columns. This principle may be extended so as to embrace the lower tier
also; and thus throw upon the columns the entire weight of all the arms
in the building and relieve the floors and the walls from any part of
the burthen.- But this I think would be injudicious as it would relieve
the walls,/ which will be well able to bear their due portion/ and
concentrate an immense pressure on the columns.-

After much consideration I am inclined to prefer running the principal
floor timbers [across]{.underline} the building; and placing the joists
length wise. The latter would thus be about 8 feet long, and may be very
light.- It would add but little to the cost, and possibly much to the
stability of the building, to place anchors or cramps, at each end of
each principal cross timber, so as to bind the walls together. Similar
fastenings to be placed at the ends of two lines of joists, so as to
secure the end walls of the building. Each line of joists to be securely
connected throughout its whole length.- The principal run of these
fastenings is to keep all safe while the building is erecting, and until
the walls become thoroughly dry and firm. Walls, which can run up
rapidly, have not sufficient time to dry, and do not become firm until
sometime after they have been covered by the roof. While in this green
state, they are easily pushed out of their true position and this is not
infrequently done when the floor or roof timbers are placed on them.-

Let us have your opinions on these and any other points which have been
suggested. By canvassing freely each others thoughts on notions, we
shall arrive at a most perfect result. I was glad to find you insisting
on the [Gable]{.underline} [ends]{.underline}; for I saw a pretty strong
inclination here to prefer the hips.- you say bold projecting parapet
walls. But why carry them higher than is requisite to give a base for
the capping stone above the slate? Anything beyond this, I think,
increases the difficulty of increasing leaks in this part. I would leave
room for pointing between the slate and the stone, and for nothing more,
unless some sufficient reason can be given for it.-

In haste yours-

W[m]{.underline}. Wade

June 7^th^ 1830

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, June 24^th^, 1830

Dear Sir

\[discussion of the purchase of several tracts of land\]

\[starting in the middle of page 2\] ...

I have been engaged in further agitations about stowing arms in your new
arsenal and think I now have the matter so arranged as to make each room
contain thirty thousand muskets, and giving free passages, both cross
and length wise of 4 feet wide, with a 9 foot passage in the center.-
This will be effected by placing half racks at the ends, and against the
pediment partition wall; and by lining the side walls 2 deep.

I do not \[??\] the racks as your proposal for that would prevent their
receiving 2,000.-

The plans are nearly ready, and will probably be sent tomorrow -- or the
next day. But lest you should proceed too far in the mean time, I will
mention that the body of the building; above the basement, should be 120
by 40 feet, [exclusive]{.underline} of the projections of the pilasters.
By [including]{.underline} these, the building will measure 120.8 by
40.8.- The front of the pediment would be precisely similar to the
ends.-

To make the stair steps 6 feet long, we must make the pediment project a
little more their first stairs. It should be 8 feet 10 inches, measuring
from the point face of the wings, to the front face of the pediment
pilasters; taken above the watertable.- It will be necessary also to
advance to the pediment partition wall. The position of this wall should
be such that its inner face will recede 18 inches from the inner face of
the wing walls; so that when the muskets are placed 2 deep on the
latter, and 5 deep on the former, the row of muskets next the passages
will be in one straight line from end to end of the room.-

You are aware I presume that the stone work of the basement projects
beyond the brick work, in the body of the building above the plinth.-

In last yours

Wm. Wade

June 24^th^ 1830

Since writing the foregoing, I have had a rough draft of the walls laid
down, which I send herewith.-

The two inner lines represent the brick wall above the first floor. The
two exterior lines, represent the stone wall of the basement.-

The dimensions are all so fully stated, that you will readily understand
them.- You will be safe in making the walls conformably to this sketch.-

Yrs W. W.

June 24^th^- 30

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to Col. R. Lee, July 1^st^, 1830

Ordnance Office

Washington, July 1^st^, 1830

Col. R. Lee

Springfield Armory

Sir,

I transmit herewith plans for the new Arsenal at the Springfield
Armory.- These drawings differ but very little from the sketch and
specifications formerly transmitted.- The principal differences are in
the interior arrangement of the arms. The plans now sent, provide for
stowing 25,000 muskets on each floor. The exterior dimensions are the
same as before stated, except that the pediment is made to project 8
feet 8 inches.- Any other variations you will find specified on the
drawings.-

The columns will be of cast iron as heretofore proposed; the drawing of
which is herewith returned.- The roofs will be finished with gable ends,
to resemble the pediment.-

Placing doors in the pediment, as you suggest, will no doubt add to the
convenience of the building; but to make them occupy the
[front]{.underline} would I think prove injurious to its appearance.-
You will perceive that the drawing represents doors at the sides of the
pediment.- The purpose you desire will be accomplished by placing them
at the sides; and without injury to the appearance of the building.-
Blank recesses, corresponding in size with the windows, should be placed
in the stories above these doors.- The drawings represent three windows
in each story of the ends of the building. It is designed that the two
exterior ones, shall be blank recesses, sunk to the depth of a half
brick or four inches. The centre one, alone, is designed for a full
window.-

The roof frame, as represented in the section, is designed merely to
show one of the methods by which it may be made strong with light
timbers; and leave space for stowage.

It is not required that you shall conform to this plan of roof in all
its details. These may be varied as you shall think proper.

While these drawings were in preparation, another arrangement of the
interior was suggested; by which each room would be made to receive
thirty thousand muskets.- The exterior dimensions of the building will
be the same as represented by the plan herewith; the only variation
being in the position of the columns, and of the partition wall.- An
outline of the plan for 30,000/per room has been prepared; and is found
to be practicable.- An accurate drawing showing the necessary details
will be forwarded in a day or two.-

I have requested that \$5,000 may be transmitted to the Pay master on
account of this work.

Respectfully, I am Sir,

Your Mo. Obt.

G. Bomford Lt. Col.

On Ordnance Service

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, July 1^st^, 1830

I find that some small blunders have escaped correction in the drawings.
The side door of the Pediment is made [10 feet]{.underline} high.- These
doors should not be continuous: they should have no side or top lights
about them, nor any railing about the steps leading to them.- I will
endeavor to find you a sketch of this part, more fully detailed.-

I am sure you will be pleased with our 90,000 arrangement with 18 or 20
feet more of length, with 3 or 4 thousand more of dollars; we could have
easily disposed of the clean hundred thousand.-

I think we will provide the portico; but cannot go the cut stone; if
made, it must be of wood.

Yours, W. W.

July 1^st^, 1830

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, July 12^th^, 1830

Dear Sir

I had hoped that we would have had the revised drawings ready for you
before this time. But so it is, the roof draught only is completed.-
This however enables me to give you the dimensions of the opening for
the main front door; and of other particulars in that vicinity.-

The drawing of the brick wall is 7 feet wide. The door sill of stone
will be 7 feet 4 inches long, 8 inches thick, and 18 inches wide, the
front edge of it will project 2 inches beyond the face of the wall. The
upper surface of the sill to be even with the upper surface of the
floor.-

The water table will not be extended entirely to the door opening but
will stop 2 feet short, on each side.- That is, the space between the
ends of the door sill, and the approaching ends of the water table, will
be two feet.- In this space the brick work will continue down smooth to
the line of stone work. The ends of the water table do not require
draping, as they will be covered by the base of the pilasters.

The height of the door opening, from the sill, will be 7 feet 5 inches,
to the commencement of the aisle, and as this will be a half circle, the
height of the opening, in the centre, will be 10 feet 11 inches; which
will leave 11 inches of masonry between the under side of the arch; and
the underside of the belting course. The belting course however is not
continued through this part; but like the water table is cut off by the
portico. It should be discontinued for a space of 11 feet- 5 ½ in each
side of the center of the door.

The portico columns will be 12 feet 6 inches long; and the shaft will be
18 ¾ inches diameter, exclusive of the base mouldings. If the base be
formed on the same solid \[??\] you must provide a tier\[?\] which will
dress 25 inches square. I would prefer a base made of separate pieces.-

In haste yours

W. Wade

July 12^th^, 1830

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

You will want two door sills, for the pediment doors. These will be 3ft
6 inches long, 8 inches deep, and 18 inches wide.-

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to Col. R. Lee, July 31^st^, 1830

Ordnance Office

Washington, July 1^st^, 1830

Col. R. Lee

Sup't Springfield Armory

Sir

I enclose herewith a revised plan, of the first floor of the new
arsenal, with noted explanations of it.- This plan is upon a larger
scale, than the drawings formerly sent, and exhibits the dimensions of
the portico, designed to cover the principal entrance to the building.

A larger drawing will be prepared and transmitted, to exhibit the minor
details of the columns, and entablature of the portico.- But as the
portico will not be put on until after the building is covered; and
probably not until next season; the drawing for it may not be sent for
some weeks.-

You will perceive that provision is made for storing thirty thousand
muskets in each floor of the building; without reducing any of the
passages to a width less than four feet; and without deranging any of
the conveniences attained by the arrangements heretofore proposed.-

Respectfully I am

Your obt. Servt.

G. Bomford

On Ordnance Services

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, August 16^th^, 1830

Washington August 16^th^

1830

Dear Sir

By your note of the 29^th^ Ultimate I perceive that you would have the
floor timbers laid before the last drawings sent you would come to hand.
And as I am very much afraid that the former plans did not give you all
the details necessary for determining the exact position of the
columns.- I would be glad to know what difficulties if any, you find in
conforming to the last revised drawing; and whether they can be
overcome, and how.

The preparation of these plans has caused me a great deal of vexation;
not only as it respects the tardiness with which they were prepared, but
the manner in which many of the details were laid down. If I had control
of adequate means, or more liaison myself, these things would not have
been.

If the delay in sending the revised plans, has not occasioned any
insurmountable obstacle, to their full accomplishment; we shall produce
a building which, I think, will bear the test of a close scrutiny; and
on which we may hereafter look with satisfaction.- Our considerations,
and modifications, of the outline, struck out at the first heat; have
been singularly beneficial.- For while little as nothing has been added
to the dimensions or cost of the building; its capacity for storage, has
been increased fifty per cent, at the same time that the appearance of
the interior arrangement has been greatly improved.- Were we now to
begin this business anew I do not know of any modifications I would
suggest, except that of enlarging the building a little so as to make it
contain precisely one hundred thousand muskets; instead of ninety
thousand, the number now provided for.

I would suggest that you should preserve all working drafts, notes and
memorandums, of the minor details of the structure, which may differ
from, or which may not be represented in the drawings suit in your
hands.- In order that when the building shall be entirely completed,
authentic and accurate materials may be at hand, for making correct
drawings of the whole and all its parts; precisely as constructed.
Drawings of this kind, so full in details as to render it unnecessary to
draw on the judgment of a future builder, would be of great value in
future operations. For I verily believe that that building will
hereafter be regarded as a model by which other buildings for like
purposes will be constructed.-

The business of initiating the inspection of contract arms will be
disposed of in the way proposed. And instructions for carrying the
arrangement into effect will be prepared and transmitted in a few days.-
I had received an indirect intimation, which led me to confusion what is
stated in yours of the 31^st^ as a fact.- A circumstance of this kind
may well account for an anxious desire to effect the proposed
arrangement of the inspections.

I remain yours

W Wade

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Maj. William Wade to Col. R. Lee, October 19^th^, 1830

Washington October 19^th^ 1830

Dear Sir

When I was arranging the details of your cast iron columns, I felt much
at a loss as to the size proper for them. I have nothing, that I would
only use as a guide, for determining what dimensions would give would
give sufficient strength; and therefore had to be governed by mere
conjecture.

I yesterday obtained an English scientific work, treating of the
strength, of iron and other substances; and I have made some
calculations for the purpose of applying the principles thus laid down,
to the columns of your arsenal.

In computing the pressure on those columns I begin with those of the
upper tier or 3^rd^ story. These have to support the roof, measured from
eave to eave, may be 50 feet. The length which rests on each pair of
columns is about 8 ½ feet = 425 square feet. This estimation at 8 pounds
per foot gives 3400 pounds. The floor will measure, say 8 ½ by 40 feet,
= 340 square feet; this in studying its load of articles stored on it,
may be estimated at 20 lbs per square foot, which gives 6800 pounds.
This, together with the roof, makes 10,200 pounds, resting on each
girder, which is supported by one pair of columns, and by the walls. But
if we consider the columns as supporting the whole, and the walls as
contributing nothing, we have for the purpose on each column in the
3^rd^ story a weight of 5100 pounds.-

The columns immediately below these, in the 2^nd^ story, will sustain in
addition to the above, the arms of the 3^rd^ story. Lay 2000 muskets,
weighing 24000 poinds, on each pair of columns, or 12000 pounds on each
column. This added to the weight borne by those in the 3^rd^ story gives
17100 pounds as the pressure on each column in the 2^nd^ story.- By
continuing in the same manner, we have for the pressure on each column
in the 1^st^ story 29100 pounds; and, for that on the granite pillars in
the basement, 41100.-

By computations, on principles laid down in the work referred to, I find
that the dimension of cast iron columns, of sufficient strength to
sustain with safety, these weights are as follows -- viz.

Pressure - Diameter Area of this Section

3^rd^ Story columns 5100 pounds 2 ¼ inches - 4 inches

2^nd^ Story \-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 17100 " \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 3 4/10 "
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 9 " \-\-\-\-\-\--

1^st^ Story \-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 29100 " \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 4 1/10 "
\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 13 ¼ " \-\--

Basement \-\-\-\-\-- 41100 " \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-- 4 ½ " \-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--
16 " \-\-\-\-\--

In the last item, the columns are shorter; of they were of the same
length as the others the diameter would be 4 7/10 and the area 17 ¼ .

I have endeavored to ascertain the comparative strength of these
materials; and find them to be nearly as follows. Viz.

> Taking cast iron as the unit = 1.00
>
> We have for granite -- about - .66
>
> For other strong stone with
>
> Scotch names\[?\]\_\_\_\_ .40
>
> Best English oak \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ .25
>
> American yellow pine \_\_\_\_\_ .25

The dimensions of these, if placed in the basement story, to bear the
weight of 41100 pounds, would be as follows, viz.

Diameter Area

Granite \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 5 ½ inches
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 24 inches

Other hard stone \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 7 1/10 "
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 40 " \_\_\_

Oak or pine \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 9 "
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 64 " \_\_\_

By this it would appear, that a granite column, to be equal in strength
to ours of cast iron, should be 50 per cent larger; that is if the iron
be 4 inches square, the granite to be equal in strength, should be 4 by
6 inches, or 5 square nearly. It also appears that oak or pine should be
four times larger than iron, to be of equal strength. In this case, if
the iron be 4 inches square, the wood to be equal to it, should be 8
inches square.-

These proportions were unexpected to me; I supposed the difference would
have been much greater. I did not think the wood column of 8 inches
square was equal to an iron one of 4 inches.

The plans for the columns which were sent you were, I believe, designed
to give an area to the section of about 15 inches; and that we suggested
taking this as a mean size. If the work I have consulted, be correct, an
area of 13 ¼ inches is sufficient for the heaviest columns in the 1^st^
story we are therefore abundantly safe.-

I think we mentioned the weight of the columns, at 50 pounds per foot,
running. The English cast iron is put down at 450 pounds per cubic foot.
At this rate, an area of 16 inches would give 50 pounds per running
foot; and this area, it appears, is sufficient to sustain the pressure
on the basement pillars.- I wish you to inform me what size you have
adopted for the columns in each of the stories: give the area which the
section of each will measure. I wish to compute them the sizes above
static; and to ascertain what weight they will safely bear.- I have no
doubt however of their ample sufficiency.-

You will perceive that the ratio of the areas and pressures is not the
same for the different columns. The pressure on each square inch
increases as the columns are enlarged. Viz.

The area of 4 inches sustains 5700 lbs. equal to 1275 lbs. per inch

" \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 9 " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 17100 " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 1900 "
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

" \_\_\_ 13 1/4 " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 29100 " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 2196 "
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

" \_\_\_\_\_\_ 16 " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 41100 " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 2568 "
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Then it appears that one inch in the last item sustains as much weight
as two inches in the first item.- I was, at first, disposed to question
the truth of the principles which give these results, but I am now
satisfied of their correctness.-

I have rec'd your letter of the 30^th^ Ult. since I last wrote to you. I
have searched your letter of the 25^th^ of May and of several others
more that date and cannot find a word in relation to the old drawings of
your establishment.

I like your plan of cast iron door frames. And I now regret that we had
not provided cast iron girders. Were we now about to erect another
building for the same purpose, I would insist on cast iron girders
across each pair of columns.

You say that the interior arrangement is such that you will be obliged
to put only 4 courses of arms at the ends of the building, in the 1^st^
story; and that six courses may be put at the ends in the 3^rd^ story.
This arrangement I suppose is necessary to preserve an uniform width of
passages, and to provide for stowing the whole 90000.- But will it not
make the numbers in the different stories unequal? giving 30000 for the
2^nd^ story; a less number for the 1^st^ and a greater for the 3^rd^?-
And guess will it not be better to preserve an uniformity of numbers in
each story, 30000 in each, by varying the width of the end passages;
then to maintain uniform passages at the expense of dissimilar numbers?

The deficiency in the end frames in the first story may perhaps be
supplied, without narrowing the end passages, by placing a course of
muskets over these passages, under the ceiling, and resting on the tops
of the frames.-

I would not like to have the stories arranged for unequal numbers; it
would mar one of the loading factors of the design.-

I remain yours

W. Wade

. . . . . . .

*Records of the Office of the Chief of Ordnance, (Record Group 156),
1797-1969 , NARG 156, Entry 3, Vol 18, Page 275-276,*

Col. Lee to Col. Bomford, March 3^rd^, 1831

Springfield Armory (Mass.)

March 3^rd^, 1831

Sir,

I write for the purpose of requesting information relative to your views
or wishes in packing the Arms we have now in the Store. The Arms made
previous to January 1^st^, 1829, are all packed in Boxes - those made in
1820 -- 16500 in number, are laid in Boxes, last not packed -- those
made in 1830 (16,500) are all standing, open at one end of the Store,
resting on the point of the Bayonets with the breech upwards, perfectly
safe and in fine order.- You will perceive that the whole number not
boxed is 33,000. I desire to know whether you would have these Arms or
any part of them packed in Boxes; Or whether you would reserve them, to
be placed in Boxes in the New Arsenal.-

I have the honor to be

Respectfully Sir

Your Very Obt' Servt

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 147 & 54*

Col. George Bomford to Col. R. Lee, March 11^th^, 1831

Ordnance Office

Washington March 11^th^, 1831

Col. R. Lee

Supt. Springfield Armory

Sir

In answer to your letter of the 3^rd^ instant I have to state, that the
arms made in the Year 1829 & 1830 (33,000) should remain unpacked; and
be placed in the open frames, in the new Arsenal, when that building is
prepared for their reception. And also, that those made during the
present & succeeding year, should be stored in like manner, until the
new building shall be filled. After which, those which have been longest
made, should be first removed, to another building to make room for
current fabrication. In this mode the new Arsenal would be always nearly
or quite filled, with the arms of most recent fabrication and exposed in
the open frames. Whenever arms are removed from the new Arsenal they
should be boxed up & stored in other buildings, and be in readiness for
transportation to distant places.

It is conceived that new arms should always remain several years
unboxed; and that when packed, they should be carefully examined, and
all discrepancies then discovered, should be supplied.- By the method
proposed, the arms will remain in the frames about five years. Those for
example, of the year 1829, would not be removed or packed before 1834.

The number of arms now at the Armory, and boxed up, is quite sufficient
to meet any demand in other parts of the country; and unless a greater
number shall be removed than is now contemplated, it will not be
necessary to box any, until after the new Arsenal shall be entirely
filled. The making of boxes should therefore be discontinued.

It is proposed to discontinue the storage of contract arms at
Middletown, and in future to transport them direct from the contractors
to the Armory, for deposit there. It is believed that the expense of
storing in Middletown exceeds the expense of conveying the arms to &
from the Armory. The greater security of storing at the latter, is,
however the most important consideration.

I will be glad to hear your views upon this subject, before a formal
decision is made.

Respectfully I am

Your Obedient Servant

G. Bomford Lt. Col.

On Ordnance Service

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to Col. R. Lee, March 25^th^, 1831

Ordnance Office

Washington March 25^th^, 1831

Col. R. Lee

Springfield Armory

Sir

Your letter of the 15^th^ inst. has been received.-

The cost of storing arms at Middletown averages from 75 to 100 cents per
box, per annum; when all are removed as often as once a year. And the
cost is much greater when the arms remain longer than one year in store,
as has generally been the case.-

The want of store room at the armory has hitherto been an obstacle to
storing the contract arms there. But as the store room there is now
ample; there is no longer any doubt of the expediency of the proposed
measure.

Instructions have accordingly been given for conveying to the armory all
the arms hereafter made in Middletown, immediately after their
inspection and approval.- It is designed that they shall remain in the
boxes; and not be arranged in the open frames in the new arsenal.-

Respectfully I am

Your obt't Servt.

G. Bomford

On Ordnance Services

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. R. Lee to Capt. Charles Thompson, New Salem, Mass. , April 5th,
1831

Springfield Armory, April 5th, 1831

Sir

Having received orders to discontinue making packing boxes, this is to
give you notice there of; and I wish you not to put together any more
than you have begun. I am disposed to close the business on as favorable
terms for your interests as may be consistent with my instructions and
my duty to the public.-

Very Respectfully Sir

I am Your Ob't Svt.

R. Lee

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 158*

Col. R. Lee to Mr. Martin H. Clapp, Montague, Mass., April 5^th^, 1831

Springfield Armory, April 5th, 1831

Sir

Your letter of the 24^th^ ult. Relative to gun Boxes is received. In
conformity with my instructions, I am anxious to discontinue the making
of Boxes soon as possible. Still I wish to deal justly with the
Contractors, and shall be disposed to take what boards you have on hand
suitable for [Boxes]{.underline} at a fair and reasonable price.-

Very Respectfully Sir

I am Your Ob't Svt.

R. Lee

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54 & 147*

Col. George Bomford to Col. R. Lee, March 11^th^, 1833

Ordnance Office

Washington March 11^th^, 1833

Col. R. Lee

Supt. Springfield Armory

Sir

I have to inform you that the appropriations for the Ordnance Service
for the present year, have been made by Congress.- And that the
following sums have been appropriated for the Springfield Armory for
1833: to be expended upon the several objects named below, viz.

For the erection of two new dwelling houses for the use of the Master
Armoror &
paymaster - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7,000

" building a pay office, and Store for the preservation of Models &
patterns

\- - - - - - - - 2,000

" building a work Shop for grinding &
polishing - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6,000

" enlarging & repairing the Shop for welding & boring musket barrels -
1,500

" additional
machinery - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3,500

" One Steam Engine of 15 horse
power - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,500

" 36 double racks for placing Arms in the new
Arsenal - - - - - - - - - - 5,100

The usual amount (\$360,000) has also been appropriated by Congress for
the National Armories for the present year. And the Sum of \$180,000 has
been allotted to the Springfield Armory for the year 1833.

The Sum of fifty thousand Dollars has been requested to be transmitted
to the pay Master, to meet expenditures of the establishment for the
present quarter.

Respectfully I am Sir

Your Ob. Ser.

Geo. Bomford

Col. Ordnance

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to Lt. Col. G. Talcott, May 16^th^, 1833

Ordnance Office

Washington May 16, 1833

Lt. Col. G. Talcott

Springfield Armory

Sir

Your letter of the 9^th^ inst. has been received.

The sum of \$10,500, has been requested to be transmitted to the
paymaster of the Springfield Armory, on account of the expenses of that
establishment for the present quarter. To be taken from the following
appropriations, viz.

For building a workshop for grinding and

polishing at the Springfield Armory - \$6,000-

" 36 double racks for placing arms in the

new arsenal, at the same armory - [\$4,500-]{.underline}

[\$10,500-]{.underline}

Respectfully I am Sir

Your obt Ser

Geo Bomford

Col of Ordnance

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to John Robb, Esq., May 16^th^, 1834

Ordnance Office

Washington May 16^th^, 1834

John Robb, Esq.

Supt. Springfield

Armory

Sir

I have to inform you that the appropriations for the service of this
Department for the present year, have been made by Congress.- And that
the following sums have been appropriated for the Springfield Armory for
the year 1834; to be expended upon the several objects herein named,
viz.:

For finishing gun racks and making windows to the new Arsenal;
rebuilding middle water shop 110 by 50 feet; and for building a house
for steam engine, including a store room for iron, 52 by 46 feet,
\$12,200.

For additional machinery and fixtures, viz.: three water wheels for
grinding musket barrels, six water wheels and twenty two forges required
in the middle water Shop, blast machinery for eleven double forges, and
for the purchase of new and improved labor saving machinery \$17,800.-

For slating roof and rebuilding water wheel of upper workshop, renewing
and repairing fences on the public ground, and for painting public
buildings \$13,500.-

The usual amount of \$360,000 has also been appropriated by Congress for
the National Armories for the present year.- And the sum of \$180,000.
has been allotted to the Springfield Armory for the manufacture of arms
for that period.- This amount together with the sum of \$2932.29,
recently paid into the Treasury for refuse articles sold at the Armory
in October last, will make \$182,932.29 applicable to the fabrication of
arms during the current year.-

The sum of \$50,000 has been requested to be transmitted to the
paymaster of the Armory, to meet the expenditures of that establishment
for the past quarter; to be taken from the appropriation for Armories.

It was found impossible to obtain the amount \$4,000, called for in your
letter of the 13^th^ January last, for the completion of the dwellings
for the Master Armorer, and Paymaster, owing to the lateness of the
application.- You will therefore progress with the work as far as
practicable, and put the buildings in as good a state of preservation as
possible, as far as the funds will permit; and the amount that will be
required for their completion, will be embraced in the estimate to be
submitted to Congress for the next year.-

Respectfully I am Sir

Your obt Servt

Geo Bomford

Col of Ordnance

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to John Robb, Esq., June 23^rd^ , 1834

Ordnance Office

Washington June 23^rd^ , 1834

John Robb, Esq.

Supt. Springfield

Armory

Sir

In reply to your letter of the 3^rd^ instant, I have to state, that the
sum of \$53,500. has been requested to be transmitted to the paymaster,
to meet the expenditures of the Springfield Armory, for the present
quarter, to be taken from the following appropriations, viz.

National Armories
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\$40,000-

For building a pay Office and Store for the preservation of

Models & patterns
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\$2,000-

For thirty-six double racks for placing Arms in the new Arsenal \_\_
\$600-

For the new Arsenal
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\$3,900-

" additional machinery and fixtures
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ [\$7,000-]{.underline}

[\$53,500]{.underline}

Respects

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

John Robb, Esq., to Major William Wade, July 16^th^, 1834

Springfield Armory

July 16^th^, 1834

Major Wm. Wade

Pittsburgh

Penn.

Dear Sir

Will you have the goodwill to inform me, what will be the cost of one
cylinder 15 horse Engine, 31 in. stroke, 9 inches bore, Boiler 31 inches
diameter and 20 feet long. And 1 cylinder 15 horse engine 36 inches
Stroke, 11 inches bore 2 boilers 15 feet long each And 28 inches
diameter, embracing all the steam & water pipes, pumps, grates &
combing, mason work for sitting boiler And [everything]{.underline}
appertaining to the sitting of the Engine in motion at Springfield?

I would like also to know the difference in the Cost between Engines
finished in the best style, and those finished Common,

Very Respectfully

I am dear Sir your Obt Sert

John Robb

Superintendent

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 54*

Col. George Bomford to John Robb, Esq., July 31^st^ , 1834

Ordnance Office

Washington July 31^st^ , 1834

John Robb, Esq.

Supt. Springfield

Armory

Sir

In reply to your letter of the 26^th^ inst. I have to state, that the
sum of \$52,400, has been requested to be transmitted to the Paymaster
of the Springfield Amory; to meet the expenditures at that establishment
for the present quarter; to be taken from the following appropriations,
viz.

For National Armories
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\$45,000-

" the New Arsenal at the National Armory Springfield, Ms. \_ \$3,900-

" Slating a roof, and rebuilding Water wheel at same Armory
[\$3,500-]{.underline}

[\$52,400-]{.underline}

Respectfully I am Sir

Your obt Serv

Geo Bomford

Col of Ordnance

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Watch Roll Jan'y 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Erastus H. Stebbins is recorded to have worked 27 nights
as a watchman @ \$.60/day for \$13.50 total\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Persons employed at the US Arsenal at Springfield Mass during
the month of January 1833

To Whom Paid How employed Time Pay Amount

Edmund Rowland Clerk Paymaster etc. Office 1 month 50.00

Calvin Stebbins Laborer 1 days Work \@1.20 1.20 51.20

Springfield Mass January 31^th^, 1833

Charles Howard

Mil. Storekeeper

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Lock Filers, etc., in the Month of January 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Jedediah Smith is recorded with 21 1/2 days work and
Erastus H. Stebbins for 8 days\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Work by Filers, etc., in the Month of January
1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Daniel Chartin is recorded filing 348 batteries\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Guns Stock'd, etc., in the month of Jan'y 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Nathan Carrol is noted as one who stocked 55 guns\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Guns Finished, etc., in the month of Jan'y 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Gersham W. Harrison is recorded for cutting 1528 ramrods
and 2 days work\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Persons employed at the US Arsenal at Springfield Mass during
the month of February 1833

To Whom Paid How employed Time Pay Amount

Edmund Rowland Clerk Paymaster etc. Office 1 month 50.00

Calvin Stebbins Laborer 1 days Work \@1.20 1.20

Erastus H. Stebbins Laborer 2 days Work \@1.20 2.40 53.60

Springfield Mass February 28^th^, 1833

Charles Howard

Mil. Storekeeper

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Lock Filers, etc., in the Month of Feb'y 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Jedediah Smith is recorded with 3 3/4 days work and
Erastus H. Stebbins for 3 ¾ days\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Watch Return March 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Erastus H. Stebbins is recorded to have worked 26 nights
as a watchman @ \$.74/day for \$13.09 total\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of April 1833

[Names Occupations Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Rufus Bush, Jr. joiner 13 ½ 22 ¼

Elisha Curtis do 14 23

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. R. Lee

Supt.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Persons employed at the US Arsenal at Springfield Mass during
the month of April 1833

To Whom Paid How employed Time Pay Amount

Edmund Rowland Clerk Paymaster etc. Office 1 month 50.00

Calvin Stebbins Laborer 6 ¼ days Work \@1.20 7.50

Erastus H. Stebbins Laborer 4 ¼ days Work \@1.20 5.10 62.60

Springfield Mass April 30^th^, 1833

Charles Howard

Mil. Storekeeper

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Guns Stock'd, etc., in the month of April 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Nathan Carrol is noted as one who stocked 55 guns\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of May 1833

[Names New Racks Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 24 ½ 24 ½

Rufus Bush, Jr. 23 ¾ 23 ¾

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. Geo Talcott

Supt. Pro Tem.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of June 1833

[Names New Racks Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 24 ½ 24 ½

Rufus Bush, Jr. 23 ¾ 23 ¾

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. Geo Talcott

Supt. Pro Tem.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Persons employed at the US Arsenal at Springfield Mass during
the month of June 1833

To Whom Paid How employed Time Pay Amount

Edmund Rowland Clerk Paymaster etc. Office 1 month 50.00

Calvin Stebbins Laborer 5 days Work \@1.20 6.00

Erastus H. Stebbins Laborer 6 ½ days Work \@1.20 7.80 63.80

Springfield Mass June 30^th^, 1833

Charles Howard

M.S.K. & P.M.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Guns Stocked etc., in the Month of June 1833]{.underline}

\[among others, Nathan Carrol is noted as one who stocked 40 guns and
filed 502 barrels\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of July 1833

[Names New Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 26 26

Rufus Bush, Jr. 23 ½ 23 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. Geo Talcott

Supt. Pro Tem.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of August 1833

[Names New Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 18 18

Rufus Bush 19 ½ 19 ½

Calvin Stebbins 4 ½ 6 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. Geo Talcott

Supt. Pro Tem.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of Sept. 1833

[Names New Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 25 ½ 25 ½

Rufus Bush 25 ½ 25 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. Geo Talcott

Supt. Pro Tem.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of Oct. 1833

[Names New Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 22 22

Rufus Bush 25 ½ 25 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Col. Geo Talcott

Supt. Pro Tem.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of Nov. 1833

[Names Dbl Racks Total Days]{.underline}

Rufus Bush 12 ½ 12 ½

Quartus S. Barton 8 ½ 29 ½

Elisha Curtis 30 30

Nathan Carrol 8 ½ 29 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

John Robb, Esq.

Supt.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Persons employed at the U.S. Arsenal at Springfield

[Mass during the month of December 1833]{.underline}

[To whom Paid How Employed Time Pay Amount]{.underline}

Edmund Rowland Clerk Paymaster @ Office 1 Month 50.00

Elisha Curtis Laborer 2 days Work @\$1.12

Quartus S. Barton do 2 days Work " 1.50

Nathan Carrol do 2 days Work " 1.50

Martin S. Sikes do 2 days Work " 1.50

John Stevens do 2 days Work " 1.50

John B. Foot do 1 days Work " 1.50

Justin Warriner do ½ days Work " 1.50

Apollos Marsh do ½ days Work " 1.50

Apollos Marsh do 2 " " with Team

Daniel Chartin do 2 days Work " 1.50

Gersham W. Warriner do 2 ½ days Work " 1.50

Isaac F. Warriner do 2 ½ days Work " 1.50

Erastus W. Stebbins do 2 ½ days Work " 1.50

" " " do 2 ½ days Work " 1.20

John Robb, Esq., Supt. Springfield Dec. 31^st^, 1833

Springfield Armory Charles F. Edwards

Mil. Storekeeper

& Paymaster

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

A Return of Master Armorers, Clerk, Master Carpenter & Inspectors
employed at the [Springfield Armory in December, 1833]{.underline}

\[among other workers is named the following\]

Rufus Bush Master Carpenter 26 Days Work

John Robb, Esq.

Superintendent

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of Dec. 1833

[Names New Arsenal Total Days]{.underline}

Quartus S. Barton 23 ½

Elisha Curtis 23 ½

Nathan Carrol 22

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

John Robb, Esq.

Supt.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Work done by Carpenters in the month of January
1834]{.underline}

\[among other workers is named the following\]

Quartus L. Barton

27 Days Work

New Arsenal

N. Carroll

27 Days Work

New Arsenal

Elisha Curtis

27 Days Work

New Arsenal

John Robb, Esq.

Supt.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Return of Work done by Carpenters in the month of February
1834]{.underline}

\[among other workers is named the following\]

Quartus L. Barton

24 Days Work N. Arsenal

Nathan Carroll

23 Days Work N. Arsenal

Elisha Curtis

24 Days Work New Arsenal

Martin L. Sikes

17 ¾ Days Work, Armory

6 " " N. Arsenal

John Robb, Esq.

Supt.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work by Carpenters, etc., in the Month of March 1834

[Names Double Racks Total Days]{.underline}

Elisha Curtis 26 26

Nathan Carrol 25 ¾ 25 ¾

Q. S. Barton 24 ¼ 24 ¼

J. Smith 5 5

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

John Robb, Esq.

Supt.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Time of Carpenters in the month of April 1834]{.underline}

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

Elisha Curtis On New Arsenal \[specific days of month recorded\] 25

On Double Racks

N. Carrol On New Arsenal \[specific days of month recorded\] 24

On Double Racks

Q. S. Barton New Arsenal \[specific days of month recorded\] 24 ½

On Double Racks

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Time of Carpenters, etc. for May 1834]{.underline}

[Names Double Racks Total Days]{.underline}

E. Curtis 27 27

N. Carrol 27 27

Q. S. Barton 27 27

J. Smith 13 ½ 13 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

Return of Work done Mil. Stores

and Clerk paymaster's Office

for March \[overwritten May\] 1834

\[written on the side of this leaf is the following\]

[Armory etc.]{.underline}

Dbl Rack 1833 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 600.-

Finishing di 34 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 3500.-

Pay Office 35 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 2000.-

Addition Machinery 34 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 7000.-

Window Shutters N A " \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ [400.-]{.underline}

15,500

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Time of Carpenters & Joiners for June 1834]{.underline}

[Names Dbl Racks Total Days]{.underline}

G. W. Harrison 16 23

E. Curtis 25 25

N. Carroll 24 ¼ 24 ¼

Q. S. Barton 24 ¾ 24 ¾

J. Stevens 25 25

E. Buckland 17 ½ 23 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Time of Carpenters, etc. for July 1834]{.underline}

[Names Dbl Racks Total Days]{.underline}

E. Curtis 24 24

N. Carroll 25 25

Q. S. Barton 26 26

J. Stevens 26 26

E. Buckland 22 ½ 22 ½

G. W. Harrison 24 24

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 230*

[Time of Carpenters and Joiners in the month of August 1834]{.underline}

[Names Dbl Racks Total Days]{.underline}

E. Curtis 2 26

Q. S. Barton 2 25

G. W. Harrison 2 22

Nathan Carroll 2 ½ 25 ½

Joseph Stevens 2 25 ¾

Efraphrus Buckland 2 22 ½

\[other names recording work elsewhere recorded\]

. . . . . . .

names compiled by R. Colton, 11/13/03 of workers during New Arsenal
construction

Quartus S. Barton

Efraphrus Buckland

Rufus Bush, Jr.

Nathan Carrol

Daniel Chartin

Elisha Curtis

John B. Foot

Gersham W. Harrison

Apollos Marsh

Edmund Rowland Clerk Paymaster @ Office

Martin S. Sikes

Jedediah Smith

Calvin Stebbins

Erastus W. Stebbins

John Stevens

Joseph Stevens

Gersham W. Warriner

Isaac F. Warriner

Justin Warriner

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 193*

Maj. James Ripley to Lt. Col. George Talbot, Esq., May 7^th^, 1844

U.S. Armory

Springfield, May 7, 1844

Sir,

I beg leave to call your attention to the crowded state of the Arsenals
at this Armory, and to request that measures may be taken immediately to
provide the additional storage room which is required. The east arsenal
is filled with packed boxes, six and seven in a tier, the racks in the
middle arsenal are entirely filled and those in the west arsenal will
contain but about 400 more. There are also from 1200 to 1400 finished
arms in the South Shop ready to be turned in whenever the required Store
room can be found.

Under these circumstances, I have requested Captain Ramsey to delay the
execution of the order referred to in your letter of the 2^nd^ instant
until I could bring the subject to your notice and receive your
instructions in relation thereto.

I am Sir,

Very Respectfully

Your Obt Servant

Jas W Ripley

Major Comdg

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 193*

Maj. James Ripley to Lt. Col. George Talbot, Esq., Oct. 24^th^, 1846

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Oct. 24^th^, 1846

Sir,

I have the honor to transmit, herewith, and to recommend, a Plan of the
Arsenal, the erection of which at this Post has been contemplated; and
to request that, should it meet your approbation, I may be immediately
informed of the fact, as it is important that the necessary building
materials should be contracted for without delay, that they may be
prepared during the coming winter.\~

Very respectfully

I am, Sir,

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Maj. Ord. Comd'g.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 193*

Maj. James Ripley to Lt. Col. George Talbot, Esq., Sept. 24^th^, 1847

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Sept. 24^th^, 1847

Sir,

The expectation of a visit to this Post from the Hon. The Secy of War
and yourself, . . ..

It is found that it will be impossible to carry forward the new Arsenal,
in accordance with the Plan furnished, without involving a much heavier
expense than has been contemplated, . . ..

Very respectfully

I am, Sir,

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Maj. Ord. Comd'g.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 193*

Maj. James Ripley to Col. George Talbot, Aug 28, 1847

Statement of operations at Springfield Armory during the year ending
June 30, 1847.

1.  Fabrication of Arms and Appendages. . ..

2.  Machinery. . ..

3.  New Tools. . ..

4.  Buildings, etc.

> . . .
>
> New Arsenal commenced
>
> . . .
>
> Aug 28, 1847 Jas W. Ripley
>
> Maj. Ord. Comd'g.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 194*

Maj. James Ripley to Lt. Col. George Talbot, Dec. 23^rd^, 1848

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Dec. 23^rd^, 1848

To

Col. Geo. Talcott,

Ordnance Office,

Sir,

I submit herewith plans of the additional buildings. . ..

The remaining portion of this item - \$6,000- is required for repairs &
installations of the two buildings & near the New Arsenal; . . ..

Very respectfully

I am, Sir,

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Maj. Ord. Comd'g.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 194*

Maj. James Ripley to Gen. George Talbot, Aug. 18^th^, 1849

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Aug. 18^th^, 1849

Sir,

I have the honor to transmit, herewith, my Annual Inventory, Statement
of Operations, and Property Return for the year which ended on the
30^th^ of June 1849.

Very respectfully

I am, Sir,

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Lt. Col. U. S. A.

The principal operations at this Armory during the year ending June 30,
1849.

1.  Fabrication of Arms and Appendages. . ..

2.  Machinery. . ..

3.  New Tools. . ..

4.  Buildings.

> The Tower and roof of the New Arsenal has been finished, the cellar
> paved, exterior of the walls oiled and the Building secured by good
> copper electrical conductors. The lathing & plastering of this
> building have been completed amounting to 9,000 superficial yards.
>
> The Arsenal is now ready for the Racks which are in rapid progress. .
> ..

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 194*

Lt. Col. James Ripley to Gen. George Talbot, 30 Aug. 1850

U.S. Armory

Springfield, 30 Aug. 1850

Sir,

I have the honor to transmit, herewith, my Annual Inventory, Statement
of Operations, and Property Return for the year which ended on the
30^th^ of June 1850.

Very respectfully

I am, Sir,

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Lt. Col. U. S. A.

The principal operations at this Armory during the year ending June 30,
1850.

1.  Fabrication of Arms and Appendages. . ..

2.  Machinery. . ..

3.  New Tools. . ..

4.  Buildings.

> The Racks in the second story of the New Arsenal have been completed &
> will contain 92,176 Muskets. The 66,981 Percussion Muskets, which were
> temporarily stored in the East Arsenal have been removed & placed in
> the Racks. 24,000 of these Arms have been cleaned & oiled. . . .. The
> Pattern House has been arranged for a Fire Engine & Watch House, & the
> East Arsenal for storing Patterns & stock in charge of the Military
> Store Keeper. . . ..

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 194*

Lt. Col. James Ripley to Ordnance Office, Sept. 1^st^, 1851

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Sept. 1^st^, 1851

Sir,

I have the honor to transmit, herewith, the Pay Master's Statement of
Money Rec'd & Expended at this Post during the Month of August last.

Enclosed, also, is a "Receipt" which should have accompanied the Annual
Inventory & which is enclosed referring to the "Return of Tools in the
Ordnance Service."

I am, Sir,

Very respectfully

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Lt. Col. U. S. A.

The principal operations at this Armory during the year ending June 30,
1851.

1.  Fabrication of Arms and Appendages. . ..

2.  Machinery. . ..

3.  Buildings.

> 47,176 Muskets have been oiled & arranged in the Racks in the Second
> Story of the New Arsenal. The Racks in the third Story, sufficient to
> accommodate 92,176 Muskets, are in progress & advancing toward
> completion.
>
> Springfield 30 June 1851
>
> Jas W. Ripley
>
> Lt Col. U.S.A.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 194*

Lt. Col. James Ripley to Col. H. K. Craig, Aug. 23^rd^, 1852

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Aug. 23^rd^, 1852

Sir,

I have the honor to transmit herewith my Annual Inventory, Statement of
Operations, Return of Tools, etc., in the current service, and general
account current with vouchers for the year ended 30 June 1852.

I am, Sir,

Very respectfully

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Lt. Col. U. S. A.

. . . .. About 45,000 Muskets have been cleaned and oiled which
completes the number remaining at the close of the preceding year,
exclusive of those in the third Story of the Middle Arsenal. . . ..

Buildings

The Gun Racks in the third Story of the New Arsenal, represented as in
progress in last years Report have been completed and are partially
filled with Arms. The Racks in the Middle Arsenal & other parts of the
building requiring it, have been repaired and put into complete order.

The painting of the New Arsenal has been commenced and is now in
progress. . . ..

U.S. Armory 30 June 1852

Springfield Jas W. Ripley

Lt. Col. U.S.A.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 194*

Lt. Col. James Ripley to Col. H. K. Craig, Oct. 6^th^, 1853

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Oct. 6^th^, 1853

Sir,

I have the honor to transmit herewith my Annual Inventory, Return of
Tools, etc., in the current service, and General Account current with
vouchers -- for the year ending: June 30, 1853, together with annual
report of operations.

I am, Sir,

Very respectfully

Your obt servt

Jas W. Ripley

Lt. Col. U. S. A.

. . . . The cleaning & oiling of the remainder of Muskets in Store has
been continued and completed during the year past. . . ..

Jas W. Ripley

Lt Col. U.S.A.

. . . . . . .

**The Ordnance Manual for the Use of the Officers of the United States
Army**, Third Ed., 1861, Washington, D.C., p. 197.

PRESERVATION OF ARMS IN STORE

Arms are kept at the arsenals either in the boxes in which they are
received from the armories, or in racks. . . .. The usual arrangement of
racks for muskets is to establish two rows of double racks, . . .. The
bayonets are passed through the middle-band swivel, the socket covering
the top of the ramrod. . . .. When there are neither racks nor boxes
prepared, the arms are stored in dry rooms, arranged in rows apart from
the walls, standing on their muzzles and supported by frames to prevent
them from pressing too much on each other. The bayonet should be unfixed
and passed through the swivel. They should be covered with tarpaulins or
cloths, if necessary, to protect them from dust.

. . . . . . .

*microfilm roll 60*

Ordnance Office to Capt. A. B. Dyer, Sept. 8^th^, 1862

War Department

Washington, Sept. 8^th^, 1862

Capt. A. B. Dyer

U.S. Armory

Springfield, Mass.

Sir,

Hereafter all serviceable arms will be kept packed in boxes ready for
immediate transportation.

Respectfully

Your Obt Servt.

Jas. W. Ripley

B. Gen. Chf. Ord.