![](media/image1.png){width="1.3506944444444444in"
height="1.3506944444444444in"}

> **UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**
>
> WASHINGTON D.C., 20460
>
> OFFICE OF
>
> PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND
>
> TOXIC SUBSTANCES
>
> DP Barcode: 319075
>
> PC Code: 128940
>
> December 29, 2005
>
> [MEMORANDUM]{.underline}
>
> SUBJECT: Section 18 Ecological Risk and Drinking Water Exposure
> Assessment for the Control of Soybean Rust Using Flutriafol (Impact 
> , 125SC)
>
> FROM: Thuy Nguyen, Senior Scientist, ERB III
>
> Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507C)
>
> THROUGH: Daniel Rieder, Branch Chief, ERB III
>
> Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507C)
>
> TO: Daniel Rosenblatt, Risk Manager
>
> Carmen Rodia, Risk Manager Reviewer
>
> MUIERB
>
> Registration Division (7505C)
>
> The EFED has reviewed the emergency exemption request from the
> Minnesota and South Dakota Departments of Agriculture to use
> Flutriafol for the control of Australasian soybean rust. This is the
> first section 18 request for this use. Flutriafol (Impact , 125SC), a
> product of Cheminova Inc, could be applied via ground or aerial spray
> at a rate of 0.91 oz a.i./A (0.0569 lb a.i./A) per application. A
> maximum of 2 applications is allowed per year with an assumed 7-day
> interval between application.
>
> Please note that no Subdivision E, J and/or N Guideline studies were
> submitted with this request. Risk assessed and presented in this
> document was solely based on the non guideline studies submitted by
> the Registrant, Cheminova Inc. According to the fate and ecological
> effects data extracted from these non guidelines studies, EFED
> concludes that the proposed use of this fungicide to control soybean
> rust presents potential risks to non target birds and mammals,
> specifically Federally-listed endangered and threatened species. This
> assessment includes the following:
>
> \- summary of potential risks associated with the use of flutriafol
> (**Section I**); and
>
> \- water assessment for the use of flutriafol on soybean (**Section
> II**).
>
> Although this risk assessment addresses the specific requests from
> Minnesota and South Dakota, the analysis of exposure and potential
> risks in this report was approached from the perspective of a
> "national" new use assessment, except for estuarine/marine
> invertebrates. The assessment of potential ecological risks for
> flutriafol is based on the use rate, the numbers of application, and
> the interval between applications outlined in the Minnesota and South
> Dakota Section 18 request. Higher rates, more frequent applications,
> or different intervals for Section 18 requests to control soybean rust
> from other states, especially those associated with estuarine or
> marine habitant, are likely to change the conclusions concerning
> potential risks to terrestrial and aquatic non-target organisms that
> are outlined below.
>
> **I. [SUMMARY OF RISKS]{.underline}**
>
> A summary of potential risks associated with flutriafol use to control
> soybean rust is provided below and in **Table I-1**. Note that no
> Subdivision E, J, and/or N Guideline studies were submitted for review
> in conjunction with this section 18 request, and risk presumed in this
> assessment was solely based on the non guideline studies submitted by
> the Registrant, Cheminova Inc.
>
> The estimation of the Estimated Environmental Concentration (EEC)
> values for [aquatic exposure]{.underline} are described in **section
> II**. Note that although this is a request for a Section 18 in
> Minnesota and South Dakota, the analysis of exposure was approached
> from the perspective of a "national" new use assessment, and the
> aquatic EECs were calculated using modeling scenarios simulated in
> areas with the highest soybean acreage and the highest level of runoff
> vulnerability: Georgia, Michigan, and Mississippi. The EEC values for
> [terrestrial exposure]{.underline} were derived from the upper bound
> Kenaga exposure values of the Kenaga nomograph, which is based on a
> large set of actual field residue data and modified by Fletcher *et
> al*. (1994). These values represent how much pesticide residue might
> be expected on various types of plants and insects that may serve as
> food items for birds and mammals foraging in and about the vicinity of
> the treated areas . All EECs were calculated at the highest
> application rate of 0.0569 lbs ai/A, 2 applications, and a 7-day
> reapplication interval.
>
> **Table I-1 - Summary of risks for the use of Flutriafol to control
> rust on soybeans**

+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
|                | **Acute Risk**           | **Chronic Risk**         |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| **Birds**      | RQ = 0.07 (1000g, short  | No data. Cannot be       |
|                | grass)\*                 | assessed                 |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| **Terrestrial  | RQ = 0.06 (15g, short    | No data. Cannot be       |
| Mammals**      | grass)\*                 | assessed                 |
|                |                          |                          |
|                | RQ = 0.05 (35g, short    |                          |
|                | grass)\*                 |                          |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| **Terrestrial  | No data. Cannot be       | No data. Cannot be       |
| Plants**       | assessed                 | assessed                 |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| **Freshwater   | No LOC exceedance        | No LOC exceedance        |
| Organisms**    |                          |                          |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| **Freshwater   | No data. Cannot be       | No data. Cannot be       |
| Plants -       | assessed                 | assessed                 |
| Vascular**     |                          |                          |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| **Aquatic      | No LOC exceedance        | No data. Cannot be       |
| Plants -       |                          | assessed                 |
| Vascular**     |                          |                          |
+----------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+

> \* Exceed Acute Endangered Species LOC of 0.05.

Note that no toxicity data were available from the Registrant's
submission to assess risks to estuarine/marine invertebrates. Since this
request is for Minnesota and South Dakota, the use of flutriafol on
soybean may not enter the estuarine/marine environment and cause
potential risk to the associated aquatic organism, and therefore the
estuarine/marine tests could be waived for this request. However, these
tests may be required if future Section 18s for flutriafol use on
soybean are requested for states/use sites associated with estuarine or
marine habitant.

**Potential Risks from Flutriafol Exposure**

> [Birds, Acute Exposure]{.underline} - Based on the upper bound
> exposure at an application rate of 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre (2
> applications, 7-day reapplication interval), the RQ was 0.07 (large
> birds, short grass food item), which exceeds the acute endangered
> species LOC of 0.05. EECs based on other food items or bird size
> classes did not result in LOC exceedances. A reduction in the maximum
> application rate from 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre to 0.0375 lbs a.i./Acre
> would result in no acute avian LOC exceedance. Application rates of
> 0.04 lbs a.i./Acre and 0.0425 lbs a.i./Acre would not result in LOC
> exceedance if the re-application interval was 14 or 21 days,
> respectively. A single application at the maximum application rate of
> 0.0569 lb ai/A does not result in acute avian LOC exceedance.
>
> EFED used the default foliar dissipation half-life of 35 days to
> estimate residue levels remaining from the first application at the
> time of the second application because no appropriate foliar
> dissipation half-life data were available for use in deriving EECs.
>
> Note that there is no LOC exceedance when the EECs were calculated
> based on the mean Kenaga values.
>
> [Birds, Chronic Exposures]{.underline} - No chronic avian data were
> available for use in RQ calculations. Therefore chronic risks to bird
> cannot be assessed.
>
> [Terrestrial Mammals, Acute Exposures.]{.underline} Based on the
> highest proposed application rate for soybeans of 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre
> (2 applications, 7-day reapplication interval), acute RQs are 0.06 and
> 0.05 for 15g and 35g herbivores, respectively , feeding on short
> grass. These RQs exceeds the acute endangered species LOC of 0.05. The
> RQs based on other food items, large herbivores, all insectivores, and
> all granivores were below the LOC. A reduction in the maximum
> application rate from 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre to 0.0413 lbs a.i./Acre
> would result in no acute mammals LOC exceedances. Application rates of
> 0.0438 lbs a.i./Acre and 0.0465 lbs a.i./Acre would not result in LOC
> exceedances if the re-application interval was 14 or 21 days,
> respectively. Also, a single application at the maximum application
> rate of 0.0569 lb ai/Acre will reduce all RQs below the acute LOC.
>
> Note that there is no LOC exceedance when the EECs were calculated
> based on the mean Kenaga values.
>
> [Terrestrial Mammals, Chronic Exposures]{.underline}. No chronic
> mammal data were available for use in RQ calculations. Therefore
> chronic risks to terrestrial mammals cannot be assessed.
>
> [Terrestrial Plants.]{.underline} No toxicity data were available for
> use in RQ calculations for terrestrial plants. Therefore risks to
> terrestrial plants cannot be assessed.
>
> [Aquatic Organisms, Acute Exposure.]{.underline} No acute LOCs were
> exceeded for freshwater organisms. Using the most sensitive toxicity
> endpoint among all freshwater organisms (LC~50~ of 890 ppb from
> freshwater invertebrates) and the highest peak aquatic exposure (EEC
> of 25 ppb from the GA Soybean scenario), no RQ exceeds the LOC.
> Therefore, it is expected that flutriafol at application rate proposed
> for this Emergency Exemption Use request does not pose acute risk to
> freshwater fish or invertebrates at the Agency's concern levels.
>
> [Aquatic Organisms, Chronic Exposure.]{.underline} No chronic LOCs
> were exceeded for freshwater organisms. The lowest reported NOAEC in
> these aquatic organisms was 310 ppb (daphnia). This value is
> approximately 10-fold higher than the highest peak aquatic EEC of 25
> ppb (GA scenario). Therefore, it is expected that flutriafol at
> application rate proposed for this Emergency Exemption Use request
> does not pose chronic risk to fish or invertebrates at the Agency's
> concern levels.
>
> [Aquatic Plants.]{.underline} The lowest algal EC~50~ was 1900 ppb.
> This value is substantially higher than the highest peak aquatic EEC
> of 25 ppb (GA scenario), which indicates no acute risks to non
> vascular plants. Chronic toxicity data for non vascular plants and
> toxicity data for other aquatic plant species are not available in the
> sources used for this assessment, therefore associated risks could not
> be evaluated.

**Co-Location of Endangered Species**

A summary of the number of endangered species located (county level)
where soybeans are produced is presented below. Individual endangered or
threatened bird and mammal species located in counties that produce
soybeans are identified in Appendix C. Only avian endangered species
LOCs were exceeded; however, potential indirect effects on species that
depend on birds for survival or reproduction cannot be ruled out at this
time.

**II. WATER ASSESSMENT FOR THE USE OF FLUTRIAFOL ON SOYBEAN**

[Surface Water Modeling]{.underline}

A Tier II water assessment was conducted for the proposed use of
flutriafol on soybeans using the proposed maximum application rate for
soybean; 0.0569 lbs ai/acre with 2 applications at 7 days interval
(assumed because not specified).

Modeling of the Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWC) and
Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EEC) were generated using PRZM3
(Vers. 3.12 beta compiled(05/24/01, Carsel, 1997) and EXAMS (Vers.
2.98.04 compiled 07/18/04, Burns, 2002). PRZM simulates pesticide fate
and transport as a result of leaching, direct spray drift, runoff and
erosion from an agricultural field and EXAMS estimates environmental
fate and transport of pesticides in a surface water body for a 30-year
period (1961 to 1990). Standard soybean cropping scenarios for three
states with the highest soybean acreage and highest runoff vulnerability
were simulated to represent the national use of flutriafol on this crop:
Georgia, Michigan, and Mississippi.

The EECs for surface water uses a single site or multiple sites, which
typically represents a high-end exposure scenario from pesticide use on
a particular crop or noncrop use site. PRZM and EXAMS were linked by the
program (PE4-PL, ver. 01). Detailed description, documentation, and
direct links for running these models can be found in:
[http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm]{.underline}. The
standard scenario for ecological exposure simulates the fate of a
pesticide transported as a result of runoff and erosion, and or spray
drift from an 10-ha agricultural field directly into a surface water
body (PRZM). The small field is assumed to be 100% cropped. The surface
water body in which the EECs are simulated (EXAMS) is the standard pond
(10,000-m2 pond, 2-m deep).

The Index Reservoir (IR) is intended as a drop-in replacement for the
standard pond for use in drinking water exposure assessment. It is used
in a manner similar to the standard pond, except that flow rates have
been modified to reflect local weather conditions. Guidance for using
the IR is located at:
[http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/.]{.underline} The index
reservoir (IR) is approximately 82 m wide and 640 m long, with an area
of 5.3 ha. (USEPA, 2000). The area of the entire watershed is 172.8 ha.
Weather and agricultural practices are simulated for 30 years so that
the 10-year exceedance probability at the site can be estimated. The
simulation was generated using 30 years of meteorological data,
encompassing the years from 1961 to 1990.

The Percent Crop Area (PCA) is a generic watershed-based adjustment
factor that will be applied to pesticide concentrations estimated for
the surface water component of the drinking water exposure assessment
using PRZM/EXAMS with the index reservoir (IR) only. No adjustment was
made for the standard pond runs. The output generated by the linked
PRZM/EXAMS models is multiplied by the maximum percent of crop area
(PCA) in any watershed (expressed as a decimal) generated for the crop
or crops of interest. Currently, OPP will apply PCA adjustments for four
major crops, one of which is soybeans. The default PCA factor for
soybeans is 0.41. Guidance for using PCAs and a thorough discussion of
this method and comparisons of monitoring and modeling results for
selected pesticide/crop/site combinations is located at:
[http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/]{.underline}.

**Table II-1** presents the input parameters used in the PRZM/EXAMS
modeling. The estimated concentrations of flutriafol in surface drinking
water (EDWCs) are presented in Table **II-2** and for aquatic exposure
(EECs) in Table **II-3**. Print outs of the surface water modeling runs
are listed in **Appendix A**.

[Ground Water Modeling]{.underline}

The SCI-GROW model version 2.3 was used to estimate the concentration of
flutriafol in ground water. SCI-GROW estimated the concentration of
flutriafol in shallow ground water sources to be **less than 1 μg/L**.
Input parameters for SCI-GROW are also presented in Table II-1. Note
that no PCA adjustment is required for SCI-GROW. Print outs of the
surface water modeling runs are listed in **Appendix B**.

[Environmental Fate]{.underline}

Flutriafol is a systemic fungicide with eradicating action. Similar to
all triazoles, flutriafol acts as a steroid demethylation inhibitor,
causing fungal cell wall to collapse and inhibiting hyphal growth.

The vapor pressure of flutriafol indicates that volatility is not a
major route of degradation for this chemical in the environment.
Hydrolysis and aqueous photolysis are also very slow. In soil,
flutriafol is quite persistent, with a half life value of more than one
year. No significant degradation products were identified in either
water or soil studies. As indicated by the adsorption/desorption
coefficients, flutriafol is moderately mobile in the laboratory tested
soils. Field studies show that there is minimal potential for flutriafol
to significantly leach to ground water under practical use conditions.

Key chemical-physical and environmental fate properties of flutriafol
used in the surface and ground water modeling are summarized in Table
II-1. The environmental fate data and physical and chemical properties
(**Table II-1**) were selected from the available non guideline study
reports in accordance with Guidance for Selecting Input Parameters in
Modeling the Environmental Fate and Transport of Pesticides, Version II,
February 28, 2002. Detailed description, documentation, and direct links
for running these models can be found in:

[http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm]{.underline}

+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| **Table II-1.          |                           |                |
| PRZM/EXAMS and         |                           |                |
| SCI-GROW Input         |                           |                |
| Parameters for         |                           |                |
| Flutriafol use on      |                           |                |
| Soybean.**             |                           |                |
+========================+===========================+================+
| Parameter              | Value and Unit            | Source         |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Max. application rate  | 2 applications @ 0.0569   | Section 18     |
|                        | lb ai/acre                | request        |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Maximum \# of          | 2                         | Section 18     |
| applications           |                           | request        |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Reapplication Interval | 7 and 14 days             | not provided   |
|                        |                           | so assumed     |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Application Efficiency | 0.95 - aerial spray       | EFED Guidance  |
| (APPEFF)               |                           |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Spray Drift (DRFT)     | 0.05 eco-aerial spray     | EFED Guidance  |
|                        | (as)                      |                |
|                        |                           |                |
|                        | 0.16 drinking water as    |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Chemical Application   | 2 (foliar application)    | Proposed use   |
| Method (CAM)           |                           |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Molecular Formula      | C~16~H~13~F~2~N~3~O       | ^1^            |
|                        |                           |                |
| Mole Wt. g/mol         | 301.3                     |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Henry's Law Constant   | 1.3 x 10^-11^ atm x m^3^  | ^1^            |
| (20°C)                 | x mol^-1^                 |                |
|                        |                           |                |
| Vapor Pressure         | 4 x 10^-7^ Pa at 20°C     |                |
| (calculated)           |                           |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Solubility in water    | 95 mg/L (20°C in water)   | ^1^            |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Partition Coefficients | 1.3 - 9.8 ( n=5)          | ^1^            |
| \                      |                           |                |
| [sorption-desorption\] |                           |                |
| Freundlich K~f~ mL/g   |                           |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Partition Coefficients | 123, 157, 295, 304, 395   | ^1^            |
|                        | (mean=255; n=5)           |                |
| K~oc~ mL/g             | 1/n=0.94-0.97             |                |
|                        |                           |                |
|                        | PRZM/EXAMS = 255 (mean)   |                |
|                        |                           |                |
|                        | SCI-GROW input = 295      |                |
|                        | (median)                  |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Hydrolysis             | stable in buffered        | ^1^            |
|                        | solutions at pH 4, 7, and |                |
|                        | 9 at 25 C within 30 days  |                |
|                        | incubation in dark        |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Aqueous photolysis     | stable in aqueous buffer  | ^1^            |
|                        | solution (pH 7) at 25 C   |                |
|                        | for periods up to the     |                |
|                        | equivalent of 66 days FL  |                |
|                        | summer sunlight           |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Aerobic soil           | 1747 (mean first order;   | ^1^            |
| metabolism             | 672-3492 days, n=10)      |                |
|                        |                           |                |
| \[half-life\] days     | PRZM/EXAMS, SCI-GROW =    |                |
|                        | 1747                      |                |
|                        |                           |                |
|                        | (mean, no raw data (only  |                |
|                        | range) were available to  |                |
|                        | calculate 90th percentile |                |
|                        | of mean)                  |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Anaerobic aquatic      | no data; compound stable  | ^1^            |
| metabolism             | to hydrolysis             |                |
|                        |                           |                |
| \[half-life\] days     | PRZM/EXAMS =3500 ( 2 x    |                |
|                        | aerobic soil metabolism)  |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Soil photolysis        | stable to sunlight of     | ^1^            |
|                        | soil surfaces             |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+
| Aerobic aquatic        | no data                   | ^1^            |
| metabolism             |                           |                |
+------------------------+---------------------------+----------------+

^1^- Cheminova A/S- Document N (Tier 3), July 2004

The Tier II assessment for flutriafol concentrations in **Table II-2**
are the 1-in-10-year annual exceedance probability for peak (acute),
annual daily average (chronic), and overall daily average (cancer)
concentrations in the Index Reservoir for 2 aerial applications applied
at the maximum proposed rate of 0.0569 lb a.i./Acre each, at 7-day
interval between application, for 30 years.

  ----------------- ------------ ---------------- ------------------------
  **Table II-2.                                   
  Tier II                                         
  PRZM/EXAMS                                      
  Flutriafol                                      
  Estimated                                       
  Drinking Water                                  
  Concentrations                                  
  (EDWCs) in Index                                
  Reservoir                                       
  corrected for                                   
  percent crop area                               
  (PCA = 0.41 for                                 
  soybeans), based                                
  on 2 aerial                                     
  applications of                                 
  0.0569 lb                                       
  a.i./Acre each,                                 
  and 7-day                                       
  interval between                                
  application**                                   

                    1-in-10 year                  
                    EDWC (ug/L)                   

  **Scenario**      **Acute**    **Chronic**      **Cancer**

  MI Bean           4            2                1

  GA Soybean        3            1                \<1

  MS Soybean        2            1                \<1
  ----------------- ------------ ---------------- ------------------------

> Tier II assessment flutriafol concentrations in **Table II-3**
> represent the 1-in-10-year annual exceedance probability for peak,
> 96-hr, 21-day, 60-day, and 90-day in the standard farm pond for ground
> and aerial applications applied at the maximum proposed rate for 30
> years.

  ---------------- ---------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ------------
  **Table II-3.                                                        
  Tier II                                                              
  PRZM/EXAMS                                                           
  Flutriafol                                                           
  Estimated                                                            
  Environmental                                                        
  Concentrations                                                       
  (EECs) in                                                            
  Standard Farm                                                        
  Pond, based on 2                                                     
  aerial                                                               
  applications of                                                      
  0.0569 lb                                                            
  a.i./Acre each,                                                      
  and 7-day                                                            
  interval between                                                     
  application**                                                        

                   1-in-10                                             
                   year EEC                                            
                   (ug/L)                                              

  Scenario         **Peak**   **96-hr**   **21-day**      **60-day**   **90-day**

  GA Soybean       25         25          25              24           24

  MI Bean          17         17          17              17           17

  MS Soybean       11         11          11              11           11
  ---------------- ---------- ----------- --------------- ------------ ------------

Additional Citations

EPA. 1999. Jones, R.D., J. Breithaupt, J. Carleton, L. Libelo, J. Lin,
R. Matzner, and R. Parker. Guidance for Use of the Index Reservoir in
Drinking Water Exposure Assessments. Environmental Fate and Effects
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington. D.C.

USDA. 2005. A Coordinated Framework for Soybean Rust Surveillance,
Reporting, Prediction, Management and Outreach. page 24,
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/ep/soybean_rust/coordfram041405.pdf

**Appendix A. PRZM/EXAMS printouts**

PRZM environment: **GAsoybeanC.txt** modified Friday, 14 October 2005 at
15:22:04

EXAMS environment: **ir298.exv** modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at
15:34:12

Metfile: w93805.dvf modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:04:32

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 1.539 1.487 1.304 0.8502 0.7725 0.2525

1962 3.733 3.6 3.215 2.472 2.137 0.8471

1963 5.343 5.161 4.472 3.323 2.831 0.9915

1964 6.327 6.168 5.358 4.368 3.885 1.444

1965 4.469 4.316 4.072 3.501 3.086 1.314

1966 7.962 7.676 6.975 5.37 4.444 1.465

1967 2.98 2.879 2.5 2.076 1.905 0.896

1968 5.382 5.199 4.863 4.125 3.661 1.35

1969 15.85 15.31 13.22 9.803 8.075 2.477

1970 3.073 2.988 2.666 2.109 1.802 1.078

1971 2.304 2.226 1.939 1.516 1.379 0.5352

1972 3.998 3.86 3.391 2.798 2.049 0.7695

1973 2.332 2.257 1.979 1.56 1.451 0.8974

1974 4.364 4.233 3.899 3.088 2.574 0.9386

1975 2.801 2.702 2.497 2.247 1.946 0.7621

1976 6.763 6.524 5.72 4.386 3.63 1.177

1977 1.82 1.768 1.568 1.229 1.043 0.6177

1978 1.18 1.141 0.852 0.7453 0.6717 0.3034

1979 4.071 3.926 3.431 2.63 2.285 0.8537

1980 2.015 1.945 1.737 1.582 1.423 0.644

1981 2.016 1.956 1.834 1.463 1.35 0.553

1982 2.682 2.588 2.241 1.806 1.566 0.6014

1983 2.721 2.628 2.459 1.732 1.474 0.6236

1984 1.782 1.725 1.512 1.159 0.9702 0.618

1985 4.985 4.84 4.197 3.439 2.514 0.8286

1986 2.295 2.214 2.046 1.653 1.578 0.9453

1987 2.573 2.484 2.153 1.493 1.235 0.6351

1988 2.565 2.476 2.146 1.72 1.625 0.7578

1989 4.306 4.154 3.626 2.899 2.462 0.9144

1990 1.979 1.911 1.704 1.461 1.259 0.6107

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 15.85 15.31 13.22 9.803 8.075 2.477

0.0645161290322581 7.962 7.676 6.975 5.37 4.444 1.465

0.0967741935483871 6.763 6.524 5.72 4.386 3.885 1.444

0.129032258064516 6.327 6.168 5.358 4.368 3.661 1.35

0.161290322580645 5.382 5.199 4.863 4.125 3.63 1.314

0.193548387096774 5.343 5.161 4.472 3.501 3.086 1.177

0.225806451612903 4.985 4.84 4.197 3.439 2.831 1.078

0.258064516129032 4.469 4.316 4.072 3.323 2.574 0.9915

0.290322580645161 4.364 4.233 3.899 3.088 2.514 0.9453

0.32258064516129 4.306 4.154 3.626 2.899 2.462 0.9386

0.354838709677419 4.071 3.926 3.431 2.798 2.285 0.9144

0.387096774193548 3.998 3.86 3.391 2.63 2.137 0.8974

0.419354838709677 3.733 3.6 3.215 2.472 2.049 0.896

0.451612903225806 3.073 2.988 2.666 2.247 1.946 0.8537

0.483870967741936 2.98 2.879 2.5 2.109 1.905 0.8471

0.516129032258065 2.801 2.702 2.497 2.076 1.802 0.8286

0.548387096774194 2.721 2.628 2.459 1.806 1.625 0.7695

0.580645161290323 2.682 2.588 2.241 1.732 1.578 0.7621

0.612903225806452 2.573 2.484 2.153 1.72 1.566 0.7578

0.645161290322581 2.565 2.476 2.146 1.653 1.474 0.644

0.67741935483871 2.332 2.257 2.046 1.582 1.451 0.6351

0.709677419354839 2.304 2.226 1.979 1.56 1.423 0.6236

0.741935483870968 2.295 2.214 1.939 1.516 1.379 0.618

0.774193548387097 2.016 1.956 1.834 1.493 1.35 0.6177

0.806451612903226 2.015 1.945 1.737 1.463 1.259 0.6107

0.838709677419355 1.979 1.911 1.704 1.461 1.235 0.6014

0.870967741935484 1.82 1.768 1.568 1.229 1.043 0.553

0.903225806451613 1.782 1.725 1.512 1.159 0.9702 0.5352

0.935483870967742 1.539 1.487 1.304 0.8502 0.7725 0.3034

0.967741935483871 1.18 1.141 0.852 0.7453 0.6717 0.2525

0.1 6.7194 6.4884 5.6838 4.3842 3.8626 1.4346

Average of yearly averages: 0.890053333333334

Inputs generated by pe4.pl ‑ 8‑August‑2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbi

Metfile: w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario: GAsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: flutriafol

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 301 g/mol

Henry\'s Law Const. henry 1.3E‑11 atm‑m\^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 3E‑09 torr

Solubility sol 95 mg/L

Kd Kd mg/L

Koc Koc 255 mg/L

Photolysis half‑life kdp 0 days Half‑life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 1000 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 3600 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 1747 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half‑life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP 0.0637 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.95 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.16 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01‑09 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd‑mm or dd‑mmm

Interval 1 interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17: FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18: PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR IR

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PRZM environment: **MIbeansC.txt** modified Monday, 10 May 2004 at
07:24:24

EXAMS environment: **ir298.exv** modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at
15:34:12

Metfile: w14826.dvf modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:38

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 5.639 5.565 5.318 4.933 4.654 1.646

1962 3.187 3.16 3.049 2.826 2.676 2.142

1963 2.42 2.394 2.328 2.285 2.191 1.565

1964 2.495 2.467 2.356 2.141 2.072 1.487

1965 5.198 5.133 4.882 4.666 4.393 2.318

1966 3.098 3.073 2.968 2.753 2.609 2.161

1967 2.8 2.768 2.643 2.523 2.54 1.736

1968 9.874 9.763 9.299 8.375 7.798 3.644

1969 5.268 5.225 5.053 4.702 4.456 3.236

1970 4.187 4.143 3.995 3.914 3.766 2.395

1971 2.964 2.939 2.839 2.635 2.498 2.043

1972 3.424 3.389 3.311 3.185 3.096 1.986

1973 3.548 3.507 3.389 3.269 3.283 2.138

1974 3.011 2.983 2.873 2.658 2.51 2.062

1975 11.89 11.78 11.48 10.56 9.851 4.105

1976 6.486 6.431 6.209 5.752 5.442 4.164

1977 3.444 3.417 3.304 3.077 2.938 2.538

1978 3.491 3.466 3.343 3.064 2.877 1.986

1979 2.257 2.238 2.161 2.002 1.901 1.581

1980 3.427 3.388 3.241 2.972 2.797 1.674

1981 4.722 4.669 4.475 4.235 4.057 2.34

1982 3.273 3.238 3.192 3.062 3.032 2.367

1983 3.71 3.667 3.519 3.364 3.196 2.18

1984 2.794 2.764 2.652 2.529 2.461 1.944

1985 9.035 8.925 8.509 7.739 7.224 3.259

1986 9.777 9.676 9.429 8.8 8.316 4.942

1987 6.892 6.815 6.587 6.029 5.727 4.571

1988 4.695 4.646 4.472 4.176 4.117 3.3

1989 5.335 5.274 5.051 4.598 4.38 2.976

1990 3.756 3.717 3.571 3.452 3.408 2.602

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 11.89 11.78 11.48 10.56 9.851 4.942

0.0645161290322581 9.874 9.763 9.429 8.8 8.316 4.571

0.0967741935483871 9.777 9.676 9.299 8.375 7.798 4.164

0.129032258064516 9.035 8.925 8.509 7.739 7.224 4.105

0.161290322580645 6.892 6.815 6.587 6.029 5.727 3.644

0.193548387096774 6.486 6.431 6.209 5.752 5.442 3.3

0.225806451612903 5.639 5.565 5.318 4.933 4.654 3.259

0.258064516129032 5.335 5.274 5.053 4.702 4.456 3.236

0.290322580645161 5.268 5.225 5.051 4.666 4.393 2.976

0.32258064516129 5.198 5.133 4.882 4.598 4.38 2.602

0.354838709677419 4.722 4.669 4.475 4.235 4.117 2.538

0.387096774193548 4.695 4.646 4.472 4.176 4.057 2.395

0.419354838709677 4.187 4.143 3.995 3.914 3.766 2.367

0.451612903225806 3.756 3.717 3.571 3.452 3.408 2.34

0.483870967741936 3.71 3.667 3.519 3.364 3.283 2.318

0.516129032258065 3.548 3.507 3.389 3.269 3.196 2.18

0.548387096774194 3.491 3.466 3.343 3.185 3.096 2.161

0.580645161290323 3.444 3.417 3.311 3.077 3.032 2.142

0.612903225806452 3.427 3.389 3.304 3.064 2.938 2.138

0.645161290322581 3.424 3.388 3.241 3.062 2.877 2.062

0.67741935483871 3.273 3.238 3.192 2.972 2.797 2.043

0.709677419354839 3.187 3.16 3.049 2.826 2.676 1.986

0.741935483870968 3.098 3.073 2.968 2.753 2.609 1.986

0.774193548387097 3.011 2.983 2.873 2.658 2.54 1.944

0.806451612903226 2.964 2.939 2.839 2.635 2.51 1.736

0.838709677419355 2.8 2.768 2.652 2.529 2.498 1.674

0.870967741935484 2.794 2.764 2.643 2.523 2.461 1.646

0.903225806451613 2.495 2.467 2.356 2.285 2.191 1.581

0.935483870967742 2.42 2.394 2.328 2.141 2.072 1.565

0.967741935483871 2.257 2.238 2.161 2.002 1.901 1.487

0.1 9.7028 9.6009 9.22 8.3114 7.7406 4.1581

Average of yearly averages: 2.5696

Inputs generated by pe4.pl ‑ 8‑August‑2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flubmi

Metfile: w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario: MIbeansC.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: flutriafol

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 301 g/mol

Henry\'s Law Const. henry 1.3E‑11 atm‑m\^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 3E‑09 torr

Solubility sol 95 mg/L

Kd Kd mg/L

Koc Koc 255 mg/L

Photolysis half‑life kdp 0 days Half‑life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 1000 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 3500 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 1747 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half‑life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP 0.0637 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.95 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.16 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 27‑07 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd‑mm or dd‑mmm

Interval 1 interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17: FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18: PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR IR

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PRZM environment: **MSsoybeanC.txt** modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at
17:07:44

EXAMS environment: **ir298.exv** modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at
15:34:12

Metfile: w13893.dvf modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:06:20

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 3.177 3.101 2.853 2.505 1.856 0.5011

1962 2.383 2.325 2.113 1.843 1.672 1.086

1963 1.567 1.529 1.383 1.205 1.08 0.6425

1964 2.107 2.059 1.972 1.709 1.61 0.8389

1965 3.327 3.263 3.118 2.631 2.296 1.103

1966 2.448 2.388 2.168 1.789 1.629 0.9192

1967 2.488 2.43 2.265 1.69 1.527 0.7947

1968 5.557 5.417 4.952 4.326 3.882 1.586

1969 3.375 3.294 3.018 2.254 1.735 1.143

1970 2.798 2.736 2.498 2.081 1.87 1.28

1971 1.784 1.743 1.608 0.9949 0.9401 0.652

1972 4.497 4.383 3.959 3.758 3.446 1.3

1973 2.691 2.626 2.448 2.131 1.962 1.218

1974 1.418 1.386 1.351 1.209 1.076 0.6875

1975 2.606 2.553 2.347 2.088 1.891 0.8271

1976 4.181 4.083 3.753 3.294 3.28 1.417

1977 4.241 4.149 3.863 3.241 2.935 1.41

1978 3.744 3.661 3.448 2.545 2.076 1.091

1979 2.86 2.798 2.556 2.117 2.047 1.368

1980 3.255 3.173 2.88 2.713 2.568 1.187

1981 6.088 5.936 5.639 4.677 3.794 1.484

1982 3.453 3.39 3.139 2.704 2.51 1.54

1983 3.006 2.936 2.765 2.258 1.924 1.068

1984 2.207 2.154 2.002 1.768 1.583 0.9988

1985 1.735 1.693 1.581 1.461 1.395 0.7179

1986 6.986 6.869 6.289 5.184 4.018 1.342

1987 5.003 4.884 4.541 3.722 2.9 1.821

1988 3.251 3.182 2.914 2.426 2.137 1.459

1989 3.993 3.898 3.582 3.445 3.225 1.394

1990 3.706 3.624 3.315 2.973 2.727 1.363

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 6.986 6.869 6.289 5.184 4.018 1.821

0.0645161290322581 6.088 5.936 5.639 4.677 3.882 1.586

0.0967741935483871 5.557 5.417 4.952 4.326 3.794 1.54

0.129032258064516 5.003 4.884 4.541 3.758 3.446 1.484

0.161290322580645 4.497 4.383 3.959 3.722 3.28 1.459

0.193548387096774 4.241 4.149 3.863 3.445 3.225 1.417

0.225806451612903 4.181 4.083 3.753 3.294 2.935 1.41

0.258064516129032 3.993 3.898 3.582 3.241 2.9 1.394

0.290322580645161 3.744 3.661 3.448 2.973 2.727 1.368

0.32258064516129 3.706 3.624 3.315 2.713 2.568 1.363

0.354838709677419 3.453 3.39 3.139 2.704 2.51 1.342

0.387096774193548 3.375 3.294 3.118 2.631 2.296 1.3

0.419354838709677 3.327 3.263 3.018 2.545 2.137 1.28

0.451612903225806 3.255 3.182 2.914 2.505 2.076 1.218

0.483870967741936 3.251 3.173 2.88 2.426 2.047 1.187

0.516129032258065 3.177 3.101 2.853 2.258 1.962 1.143

0.548387096774194 3.006 2.936 2.765 2.254 1.924 1.103

0.580645161290323 2.86 2.798 2.556 2.131 1.891 1.091

0.612903225806452 2.798 2.736 2.498 2.117 1.87 1.086

0.645161290322581 2.691 2.626 2.448 2.088 1.856 1.068

0.67741935483871 2.606 2.553 2.347 2.081 1.735 0.9988

0.709677419354839 2.488 2.43 2.265 1.843 1.672 0.9192

0.741935483870968 2.448 2.388 2.168 1.789 1.629 0.8389

0.774193548387097 2.383 2.325 2.113 1.768 1.61 0.8271

0.806451612903226 2.207 2.154 2.002 1.709 1.583 0.7947

0.838709677419355 2.107 2.059 1.972 1.69 1.527 0.7179

0.870967741935484 1.784 1.743 1.608 1.461 1.395 0.6875

0.903225806451613 1.735 1.693 1.581 1.209 1.08 0.652

0.935483870967742 1.567 1.529 1.383 1.205 1.076 0.6425

0.967741935483871 1.418 1.386 1.351 0.9949 0.9401 0.5011

0.1 5.5016 5.3637 4.9109 4.2692 3.7592 1.5344

Average of yearly averages: 1.14132333333333

Inputs generated by pe4.pl ‑ 8‑August‑2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbi

Metfile: w13893.dvf

PRZM scenario: MSsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file: ir298.exv

Chemical Name: flutriafol

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 301 g/mol

Henry\'s Law Const. henry 1.3E‑11 atm‑m\^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 3E‑09 torr

Solubility sol 95 mg/L

Kd Kd mg/L

Koc Koc 255 mg/L

Photolysis half‑life kdp 0 days Half‑life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 1000 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 3500 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 1747 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half‑life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP 0.0637 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.95 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.16 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01‑09 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd‑mm or dd‑mmm

Interval 1 interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17: FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18: PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR IR

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF total none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PRZM environment: **GAsoybeanC.txt** modified Friday, 14 October 2005 at
15:22:04

EXAMS environment: **pond298.exv** modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at
16:33:30

Metfile: w93805.dvf modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:04:32

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 1.988 1.976 1.848 1.306 1.154 0.3452

1962 4.844 4.809 4.679 4.534 4.527 2.515

1963 8.296 8.251 8.08 7.77 7.705 5.08

1964 12.83 12.78 12.57 12.3 12.09 8.488

1965 14.91 14.86 14.68 14.45 14.3 12.14

1966 19 18.92 18.73 18.38 18.13 14.57

1967 18.03 18 17.91 17.78 17.41 16.6

1968 20.61 20.57 20.39 20.29 20.19 17.88

1969 30.59 30.45 29.87 28.86 28.36 21.53

1970 26.96 26.93 26.83 26.63 26.49 25.33

1971 24.68 24.66 24.61 24.5 24.41 23.54

1972 24.29 24.25 24.12 23.54 23.16 22.36

1973 23.86 23.83 23.73 23.55 23.4 22.48

1974 23.71 23.67 23.46 23.18 23 21.81

1975 22.58 22.54 22.42 22.29 22.18 21.57

1976 25.06 24.99 24.77 24.43 24.11 21.62

1977 23.73 23.71 23.64 23.5 23.38 22.19

1978 21.3 21.3 21.26 21.19 21.12 20.15

1979 21.21 21.15 20.97 20.72 20.64 19.49

1980 20.36 20.35 20.29 20.17 20.08 19.36

1981 19.28 19.27 19.23 19.14 19.06 18.48

1982 18.71 18.67 18.52 18.38 18.3 17.79

1983 18.65 18.63 18.55 17.93 17.72 17.25

1984 18.48 18.46 18.38 18.24 18.14 17.35

1985 19.23 19.18 19.04 18.97 17.92 16.67

1986 18.82 18.8 18.74 18.47 18.36 17.86

1987 18.63 18.59 18.49 18.37 18.28 17.62

1988 18.46 18.44 18.37 18.16 18.18 17.55

1989 19.77 19.72 19.55 19.33 19.21 17.81

1990 18.87 18.85 18.79 18.65 18.54 17.84

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 30.59 30.45 29.87 28.86 28.36 25.33

0.0645161290322581 26.96 26.93 26.83 26.63 26.49 23.54

0.0967741935483871 25.06 24.99 24.77 24.5 24.41 22.48

0.129032258064516 24.68 24.66 24.61 24.43 24.11 22.36

0.161290322580645 24.29 24.25 24.12 23.55 23.4 22.19

0.193548387096774 23.86 23.83 23.73 23.54 23.38 21.81

0.225806451612903 23.73 23.71 23.64 23.5 23.16 21.62

0.258064516129032 23.71 23.67 23.46 23.18 23 21.57

0.290322580645161 22.58 22.54 22.42 22.29 22.18 21.53

0.32258064516129 21.3 21.3 21.26 21.19 21.12 20.15

0.354838709677419 21.21 21.15 20.97 20.72 20.64 19.49

0.387096774193548 20.61 20.57 20.39 20.29 20.19 19.36

0.419354838709677 20.36 20.35 20.29 20.17 20.08 18.48

0.451612903225806 19.77 19.72 19.55 19.33 19.21 17.88

0.483870967741936 19.28 19.27 19.23 19.14 19.06 17.86

0.516129032258065 19.23 19.18 19.04 18.97 18.54 17.84

0.548387096774194 19 18.92 18.79 18.65 18.36 17.81

0.580645161290323 18.87 18.85 18.74 18.47 18.3 17.79

0.612903225806452 18.82 18.8 18.73 18.38 18.28 17.62

0.645161290322581 18.71 18.67 18.55 18.38 18.18 17.55

0.67741935483871 18.65 18.63 18.52 18.37 18.14 17.35

0.709677419354839 18.63 18.59 18.49 18.24 18.13 17.25

0.741935483870968 18.48 18.46 18.38 18.16 17.92 16.67

0.774193548387097 18.46 18.44 18.37 17.93 17.72 16.6

0.806451612903226 18.03 18 17.91 17.78 17.41 14.57

0.838709677419355 14.91 14.86 14.68 14.45 14.3 12.14

0.870967741935484 12.83 12.78 12.57 12.3 12.09 8.488

0.903225806451613 8.296 8.251 8.08 7.77 7.705 5.08

0.935483870967742 4.844 4.809 4.679 4.534 4.527 2.515

0.967741935483871 1.988 1.976 1.848 1.306 1.154 0.3452

0.1 25.022 24.957 24.754 24.493 24.38 22.468

Average of yearly averages: 17.1756066666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl ‑ 8‑August‑2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbp

Metfile: w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario: GAsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file: pond298.exv

Chemical Name: flutriafol

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 301 g/mol

Henry\'s Law Const. henry 1.3E‑11 atm‑m\^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 3E‑09 torr

Solubility sol 95 mg/L

Kd Kd mg/L

Koc Koc 255 mg/L

Photolysis half‑life kdp 0 days Half‑life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 1000 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 3600 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 1747 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half‑life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP 0.125 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.95 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.05 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01‑09 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd‑mm or dd‑mmm

Interval 1 interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17: FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18: PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Pond

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF none none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PRZM environment: **MIbeansC.txt** modified Monday, 10 May 2004 at
07:24:24

EXAMS environment: **pond298.exv** modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at
16:33:30

Metfile: w14826.dvf modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:38

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 2.433 2.413 2.345 2.293 2.26 0.8431

1962 2.56 2.555 2.543 2.521 2.508 2.203

1963 3.12 3.114 3.092 3.059 3.054 2.679

1964 3.671 3.664 3.637 3.594 3.586 3.201

1965 5.299 5.284 5.229 5.191 5.15 4.146

1966 5.322 5.315 5.3 5.281 5.262 5.05

1967 5.934 5.929 5.912 5.889 5.86 5.415

1968 9.309 9.279 9.155 8.937 8.825 6.898

1969 8.521 8.516 8.501 8.475 8.455 8.33

1970 9.345 9.334 9.298 9.247 9.231 8.572

1971 9.141 9.138 9.125 9.099 9.082 8.973

1972 9.711 9.703 9.679 9.641 9.63 9.169

1973 10.17 10.16 10.13 10.08 10.03 9.551

1974 10.1 10.09 10.07 10.04 10.02 9.888

1975 14.07 14.04 13.93 13.72 13.57 11.07

1976 13.13 13.12 13.07 13.01 12.98 12.75

1977 12.92 12.91 12.89 12.86 12.84 12.68

1978 12.95 12.94 12.89 12.8 12.76 12.52

1979 12.64 12.64 12.62 12.59 12.57 12.31

1980 12.63 12.61 12.57 12.49 12.45 12.1

1981 13.26 13.25 13.2 13.11 13.06 12.42

1982 12.99 12.98 12.96 12.92 12.92 12.73

1983 13.13 13.11 13.05 13.03 13 12.71

1984 12.87 12.86 12.85 12.82 12.79 12.64

1985 15.32 15.29 15.16 14.96 14.85 13.18

1986 16.95 16.92 16.84 16.67 16.58 14.94

1987 16.99 16.97 16.89 16.75 16.68 16.12

1988 16.61 16.59 16.54 16.48 16.46 16.22

1989 17.09 17.06 16.99 16.85 16.78 16.3

1990 16.58 16.57 16.54 16.51 16.48 16.31

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 17.09 17.06 16.99 16.85 16.78 16.31

0.0645161290322581 16.99 16.97 16.89 16.75 16.68 16.3

0.0967741935483871 16.95 16.92 16.84 16.67 16.58 16.22

0.129032258064516 16.61 16.59 16.54 16.51 16.48 16.12

0.161290322580645 16.58 16.57 16.54 16.48 16.46 14.94

0.193548387096774 15.32 15.29 15.16 14.96 14.85 13.18

0.225806451612903 14.07 14.04 13.93 13.72 13.57 12.75

0.258064516129032 13.26 13.25 13.2 13.11 13.06 12.73

0.290322580645161 13.13 13.12 13.07 13.03 13 12.71

0.32258064516129 13.13 13.11 13.05 13.01 12.98 12.68

0.354838709677419 12.99 12.98 12.96 12.92 12.92 12.64

0.387096774193548 12.95 12.94 12.89 12.86 12.84 12.52

0.419354838709677 12.92 12.91 12.89 12.82 12.79 12.42

0.451612903225806 12.87 12.86 12.85 12.8 12.76 12.31

0.483870967741936 12.64 12.64 12.62 12.59 12.57 12.1

0.516129032258065 12.63 12.61 12.57 12.49 12.45 11.07

0.548387096774194 10.17 10.16 10.13 10.08 10.03 9.888

0.580645161290323 10.1 10.09 10.07 10.04 10.02 9.551

0.612903225806452 9.711 9.703 9.679 9.641 9.63 9.169

0.645161290322581 9.345 9.334 9.298 9.247 9.231 8.973

0.67741935483871 9.309 9.279 9.155 9.099 9.082 8.572

0.709677419354839 9.141 9.138 9.125 8.937 8.825 8.33

0.741935483870968 8.521 8.516 8.501 8.475 8.455 6.898

0.774193548387097 5.934 5.929 5.912 5.889 5.86 5.415

0.806451612903226 5.322 5.315 5.3 5.281 5.262 5.05

0.838709677419355 5.299 5.284 5.229 5.191 5.15 4.146

0.870967741935484 3.671 3.664 3.637 3.594 3.586 3.201

0.903225806451613 3.12 3.114 3.092 3.059 3.054 2.679

0.935483870967742 2.56 2.555 2.543 2.521 2.508 2.203

0.967741935483871 2.433 2.413 2.345 2.293 2.26 0.8431

0.1 16.916 16.887 16.81 16.654 16.57 16.21

Average of yearly averages: 10.0639366666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl ‑ 8‑August‑2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flubmp

Metfile: w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario: MIbeansC.txt

EXAMS environment file: pond298.exv

Chemical Name: flutriafol

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 301 g/mol

Henry\'s Law Const. henry 1.3E‑11 atm‑m\^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 3E‑09 torr

Solubility sol 95 mg/L

Kd Kd mg/L

Koc Koc 255 mg/L

Photolysis half‑life kdp 0 days Half‑life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 1000 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 3500 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 1747 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half‑life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP 0.0637 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.95 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.05 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 27‑07 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd‑mm or dd‑mmm

Interval 1 interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17: FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18: PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Pond

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF none none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PRZM environment: **MSsoybeanC.txt** modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at
17:07:44

EXAMS environment: **pond298.exv** modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at
16:33:30

Metfile: w13893.dvf modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:06:20

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

1961 1.613 1.604 1.58 1.384 1.029 0.2744

1962 2.16 2.15 2.123 2.107 2.102 1.586

1963 2.618 2.614 2.599 2.438 2.414 2.109

1964 3.516 3.511 3.485 3.318 3.212 2.72

1965 4.432 4.416 4.366 4.285 4.233 3.547

1966 4.754 4.742 4.702 4.64 4.633 4.2

1967 5.344 5.334 5.322 5.038 4.915 4.568

1968 6.962 6.94 6.855 6.771 6.742 5.498

1969 7.331 7.308 7.169 6.868 6.598 6.376

1970 7.484 7.471 7.449 7.384 7.31 7.004

1971 7.248 7.244 7.23 7.198 7.174 6.921

1972 8.42 8.404 8.363 8.282 8.202 7.169

1973 8.255 8.236 8.201 8.155 8.145 7.87

1974 8.071 8.066 8.048 8.01 7.978 7.694

1975 8.104 8.095 8.062 8.013 7.879 7.53

1976 9.156 9.137 9.092 8.996 8.858 7.986

1977 9.46 9.434 9.366 9.263 9.241 8.624

1978 9.761 9.746 9.694 9.24 9.038 8.771

1979 9.616 9.607 9.572 9.506 9.458 9.2

1980 9.729 9.718 9.685 9.64 9.596 9.187

1981 10.94 10.91 10.85 10.72 10.36 9.391

1982 10.6 10.58 10.55 10.47 10.45 10.11

1983 10.54 10.53 10.51 10.38 10.35 10.01

1984 10.42 10.42 10.39 10.33 10.29 9.907

1985 9.84 9.837 9.824 9.794 9.762 9.409

1986 11.3 11.29 11.2 10.96 10.29 9.268

1987 11.48 11.46 11.42 11.15 10.7 10.31

1988 11.26 11.25 11.21 11.14 11.09 10.68

1989 11.49 11.47 11.41 11.37 11.33 10.64

1990 11.51 11.49 11.42 11.32 11.28 10.88

Sorted results

Prob. Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly

0.032258064516129 11.51 11.49 11.42 11.37 11.33 10.88

0.0645161290322581 11.49 11.47 11.42 11.32 11.28 10.68

0.0967741935483871 11.48 11.46 11.41 11.15 11.09 10.64

0.129032258064516 11.3 11.29 11.21 11.14 10.7 10.31

0.161290322580645 11.26 11.25 11.2 10.96 10.45 10.11

0.193548387096774 10.94 10.91 10.85 10.72 10.36 10.01

0.225806451612903 10.6 10.58 10.55 10.47 10.35 9.907

0.258064516129032 10.54 10.53 10.51 10.38 10.29 9.409

0.290322580645161 10.42 10.42 10.39 10.33 10.29 9.391

0.32258064516129 9.84 9.837 9.824 9.794 9.762 9.268

0.354838709677419 9.761 9.746 9.694 9.64 9.596 9.2

0.387096774193548 9.729 9.718 9.685 9.506 9.458 9.187

0.419354838709677 9.616 9.607 9.572 9.263 9.241 8.771

0.451612903225806 9.46 9.434 9.366 9.24 9.038 8.624

0.483870967741936 9.156 9.137 9.092 8.996 8.858 7.986

0.516129032258065 8.42 8.404 8.363 8.282 8.202 7.87

0.548387096774194 8.255 8.236 8.201 8.155 8.145 7.694

0.580645161290323 8.104 8.095 8.062 8.013 7.978 7.53

0.612903225806452 8.071 8.066 8.048 8.01 7.879 7.169

0.645161290322581 7.484 7.471 7.449 7.384 7.31 7.004

0.67741935483871 7.331 7.308 7.23 7.198 7.174 6.921

0.709677419354839 7.248 7.244 7.169 6.868 6.742 6.376

0.741935483870968 6.962 6.94 6.855 6.771 6.598 5.498

0.774193548387097 5.344 5.334 5.322 5.038 4.915 4.568

0.806451612903226 4.754 4.742 4.702 4.64 4.633 4.2

0.838709677419355 4.432 4.416 4.366 4.285 4.233 3.547

0.870967741935484 3.516 3.511 3.485 3.318 3.212 2.72

0.903225806451613 2.618 2.614 2.599 2.438 2.414 2.109

0.935483870967742 2.16 2.15 2.123 2.107 2.102 1.586

0.967741935483871 1.613 1.604 1.58 1.384 1.029 0.2744

0.1 11.462 11.443 11.39 11.149 11.051 10.607

Average of yearly averages: 7.31464666666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl ‑ 8‑August‑2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbr

Metfile: w13893.dvf

PRZM scenario: MSsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file: pond298.exv

Chemical Name: flutriafol

Description Variable Name Value Units Comments

Molecular weight mwt 301 g/mol

Henry\'s Law Const. henry 1.3E‑11 atm‑m\^3/mol

Vapor Pressure vapr 3E‑09 torr

Solubility sol 95 mg/L

Kd Kd mg/L

Koc Koc 255 mg/L

Photolysis half‑life kdp 0 days Half‑life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 1000 days Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacs 3500 days Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 1747 days Halfife

Hydrolysis: pH 7 0 days Half‑life

Method: CAM 2 integer See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth: DEPI 0 cm

Application Rate: TAPP 0.0637 kg/ha

Application Efficiency: APPEFF 0.95 fraction

Spray Drift DRFT 0.05 fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date Date 01‑09 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd‑mm or dd‑mmm

Interval 1 interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17: FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18: PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC 0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run IR Pond

Flag for runoff calc. RUNOFF none none, monthly or total(average of
entire run)

**Appendix B. SCI-GROW Print-out**

SCIGROW - VERSION 2.3

ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SCREENING MODEL FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

SciGrow version 2.3

chemical:flutriafol

time is 11/25/2005 13:39:43

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--‑‑\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--‑‑‑‑‑

Application Number of Total Use K~oc~ Soil Aerobic

rate (lb/acre) applications (lb/acre/yr) (ml/g) metabolism (days)

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--‑‑‑‑‑

0.057 2.0 0.114 2.95E+02 1747.0

‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑‑\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--‑‑‑

groundwater screening cond (ppb) = 5.83E‑01

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

**Appendix C. Identity of Endangered Avian and Mammalian Species Located
in Soybean Producing Counties.**

Species Details by State for Preliminary Assessment

*Soybeans (176)*

Minimum of 1 Acre.

***Alabama*** (8 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

MOUSE, ALABAMA BEACH Mammal Yes

MOUSE, PERDIDO KEY BEACH Mammal Yes

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

STORK, WOOD Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Arkansas*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Delaware*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX Mammal No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

***Florida*** (12 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 1 of 9

JAY, FLORIDA SCRUB Bird No

KITE, EVERGLADE SNAIL Bird Yes

MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA) Mammal Yes

MOUSE, CHOCTAWHATCHEE BEACH Mammal Yes

MOUSE, PERDIDO KEY BEACH Mammal Yes

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

STORK, WOOD Bird No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Georgia*** (8 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA) Mammal Yes

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

STORK, WOOD Bird No

WARBLER (WOOD), KIRTLAND\'S Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Illinois*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***Indiana*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 2 of 9

***Iowa*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***Kansas*** (7 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

CRANE, WHOOPING Bird Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

FERRET, BLACK-FOOTED Mammal No

PLOVER, MOUNTAIN Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***Kentucky*** (6 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

BAT, VIRGINIA BIG-EARED Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Louisiana*** (8 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BEAR, AMERICAN BLACK Mammal No

BEAR, LOUISIANA BLACK Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PELICAN, BROWN Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, CALIFORNIA LEAST Bird No

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 3 of 9

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Maine*** (3 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

LYNX, CANADA Mammal No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

***Maryland*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX Mammal No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

***Massachusetts*** (2 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

***Michigan*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

WARBLER (WOOD), KIRTLAND\'S Bird No

WOLF, GRAY Mammal Yes

***Minnesota*** (3 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

WOLF, GRAY Mammal Yes

***Mississippi*** (6 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BEAR, LOUISIANA BLACK Mammal Yes

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 4 of 9

CRANE, MISSISSIPPI SANDHILL Bird Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PELICAN, BROWN Bird No

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Missouri*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***Nebraska*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

CRANE, WHOOPING Bird Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

FERRET, BLACK-FOOTED Mammal No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***New Jersey*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

***New York*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 5 of 9

***North Carolina*** (11 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

CAHOW Bird No

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA) Mammal Yes

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

SQUIRREL, CAROLINA NORTHERN FLYING Mammal No

STORK, WOOD Bird No

TERN, ROSEATE Bird No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

WOLF, RED Mammal No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***North Dakota*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

CRANE, WHOOPING Bird Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***Ohio*** (3 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

***Oklahoma*** (10 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

BAT, OZARK BIG-EARED Mammal No

CRANE, WHOOPING Bird Yes

CURLEW, ESKIMO Bird No

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 6 of 9

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

VIREO, BLACK-CAPPED Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Pennsylvania*** (4 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX Mammal No

***South Carolina*** (7 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA) Mammal Yes

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

STORK, WOOD Bird No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

WOLF, RED Mammal No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***South Dakota*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

CRANE, WHOOPING Bird Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

FERRET, BLACK-FOOTED Mammal No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

***Tennessee*** (7 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

SQUIRREL, CAROLINA NORTHERN FLYING Mammal No

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 7 of 9

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

WOLF, RED Mammal No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Texas*** (15 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BEAR, LOUISIANA BLACK Mammal Yes

CRANE, WHOOPING Bird Yes

CURLEW, ESKIMO Bird No

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

FALCON, NORTHERN APLOMADO Bird No

JAGUARUNDI, Gulf Coast Mammal No

OCELOT Mammal No

PELICAN, BROWN Bird No

PLOVER, MOUNTAIN Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

PRAIRIE-CHICKEN, ATTWATER\'S GREATER Bird No

TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST Bird No

VIREO, BLACK-CAPPED Bird No

WARBLER (WOOD), GOLDEN-CHEEKED Bird No

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***Vermont*** (2 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

***Virginia*** (7 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

BAT, VIRGINIA BIG-EARED Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

PLOVER, PIPING Bird Yes

SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX Mammal No

WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT Mammal Yes

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 8 of 9

WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED Bird No

***West virginia*** (5 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

BAT, GRAY Mammal No

BAT, INDIANA Mammal Yes

BAT, VIRGINIA BIG-EARED Mammal Yes

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

SQUIRREL, VIRGINIA NORTHERN FLYING Mammal No

***Wisconsin*** (3 species)

**[Group]{.underline}** **[Critical Habitat]{.underline}**

EAGLE, BALD Bird No

WARBLER (WOOD), KIRTLAND\'S Bird No

WOLF, GRAY Mammal Yes

Thursday, July 28, 2005 Page 9 of 9