**[\<]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}\[EPA--HQ--OPP--2008--\[0600\]; FRL--XXXX--X\][\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}Notice of Receipt of a Pesticide Petition Filed for
Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various
Commodities[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<\<]{.mark}AGENCY:[\>]{.mark}** [\<]{.mark}Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).[\>\>]{.mark}

**[\<\<]{.mark}ACTION:[\>]{.mark}**
[\<]{.mark}Notice[\>]{.mark}.[\>]{.mark}

**[\<\<]{.mark}SUMMARY:[\>]{.mark}** [\<]{.mark}This notice announces
the initial filing of a pesticide petition proposing the establishment
or modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.[\>\>]{.mark}

**[\<\<]{.mark}DATES:[\>]{.mark}** [\<]{.mark}Comments must be received
on or before \[*[\<]{.mark}insert date 30 days after date of publication
in the[\>]{.mark}* **[\<]{.mark}Federal
Register**[\>]{.mark}\].[\>\>]{.mark}

**[\<\<]{.mark}ADDRESSES:[\>]{.mark}** [\<]{.mark}Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID) number
EPA--HQ--OPP--2008--**\[0600\]** and the pesticide petition number (PP),
by one of the following methods:[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • *[\<]{.mark}Federal eRulemaking Portal*[\>]{.mark}:
[\<]{.mark} *http://www.regulations.gov*[\>]{.mark}. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • *[\<]{.mark}Mail[\>]{.mark}*: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460--0001.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • *[\<]{.mark}Delivery[\>]{.mark}*: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S--4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA.
Deliveries are only accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours
of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays). Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305--5805.[\>]{.mark}

*[\<]{.mark} [\<]{.mark}Instructions[\>]{.mark}*: Direct your comments
to docket ID number EPA--HQ--OPP--2008**--\[0600\]** and the pesticide
petition number (PP). EPA\'s policy is that all comments received will
be included in the docket without change and may be made available
on-line at *[\<]{.mark}http://www.regulations.gov[\>]{.mark}*, including
any personal information provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not
submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected
through regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulations.gov website is an
"anonymous access" system, which means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going
through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.*[\>]{.mark}*

*[\<]{.mark} [\<]{.mark}Docket[\>]{.mark}*: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available at
*[\<]{.mark}[http://www.regulations.gov](http://www.regulations.gov/)[\>]{.mark}*.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either in the
electronic docket at
*[\<]{.mark}[http://www.regulations.gov](http://www.regulations.gov/)[\>]{.mark}*,
or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket
in Rm. S--4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305--5805.[\>\>]{.mark}

**[\<\<]{.mark}FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:[\>]{.mark}**
[\<]{.mark}**Joanne I. Miller**, **Registration Division (7505P)**,
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: **703-305-6217**; e-mail address: 
**Miller.Joanne***[\<]{.mark}\@epa.gov*[\>]{.mark}.[\>\>\>]{.mark}

**[\<\<]{.mark}SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}I. General Information[\>]{.mark}**

*[\<]{.mark}A. Does this Action Apply to Me?[\>]{.mark}*

[\<]{.mark} You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited
to:[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • Crop production (NAICS code 111).[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • Animal production (NAICS code 112).[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by
this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether
this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed under **[\<]{.mark}FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.**[\>\>]{.mark}

*[\<]{.mark}B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for
EPA?[\>]{.mark}*

[\<]{.mark} 1. [\<]{.mark}*Submitting CBI*[\>]{.mark}. Do not submit
this information to EPA through regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the
disk or CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} 2. [\<]{.mark}*Tips for preparing your comments*[\>]{.mark}.
When submitting comments, remember to:[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other
identifying information (subject heading, [\<]{.mark}**Federal
Register**[\>]{.mark} date and page number).[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns
and suggest alternatives.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment
period deadline identified.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} 3. *[\<]{.mark}Environmental justice[\>]{.mark}*. EPA seeks
to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful
involvement of any group, including minority and/or low income
populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential
environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups
or segments of the population who, as a result of their location,
cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or
environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides discussed in this
document, compared to the general population.[\>]{.mark}

**[\<]{.mark}II. What Action is the Agency Taking?[\>]{.mark}**

[\<]{.mark} Number range CHAPTEREPA is printing notice of the filing of
a pesticide petition received under section 408 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, proposing the
establishment or modification of regulations in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of pesticide chemicals in or on various food commodities. EPA
has determined that the pesticide petition described in this notice
contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in FFDCA
section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency
of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting
of the pesticide petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA
rules on this pesticide petition.[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} Number range CHAPTERPursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary
of the petition included in this notice, prepared by the petitioner, is
included in a docket EPA has created for this rulemaking. The docket for
this petition is available on-line at
*[\<]{.mark}[http://www.regulations.gov](http://www.regulations.gov/)[\>]{.mark}***.**

**Dow AgroSciences, LLC**

**[\<\[8F7403\]\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** EPA has received a pesticide petition
**[(]{.mark}****[8F7403)]{.mark}** from **Dow AgroSciences, LLC, 9330
Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN, 46268** proposing, pursuant to
section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.**[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<\>]{.mark}**

> [\<]{.mark} 1. to [reestablish and make permanent tolerances]{.mark}
> for residues of[\>]{.mark}

**[\<]{.mark} the combined residues of cyhalofop (cyhalofop-butyl,
R-(+)-n-butyl-2-(4(4-cyano-2-fluorophenoxy)-phenoxy)propionate, plus
cyhalofop acid,
R-(+)-2-(4(4-cyano-2-fluorophenoxy)-phenoxy)propionicacid) and the
di-acid metabolite, (2R)-4-4-(1-carboxyethoxy)phenoxy\]-3-fluorobenzoic
acid** in or on the raw agricultural commodity **Rice, grain** at
**0.03** parts per million (ppm) and **Rice, straw** at **8.0** ppm. EPA
has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding
the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of FDDCA; however, EPA has
not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time
or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data
may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.**[\>]{.mark}**

[\<]{.mark}*A. Residue Chemistry*[\>]{.mark}

**[\<]{.mark}** 1. *Plant metabolism.* **The metabolism of
cyhalofop-butyl in plants (rice) is adequately understood for the
purposes of a tolerance in rice. Two separate foliar broadcast 14C NOR
studies have been conducted. Results indicated cyhalofop-butyl was
metabolized to cyhalofop (acid form) and then subsequently to the free
and conjugated forms of the di-acid and the FHPBA. Other minor
metabolites were also identified. In addition, the rotational crop study
showed no carryover of significant cyhalofop-butyl related residues in
representative crops.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 2. *Analytical method.* **An adequate analytical method
is available for enforcement purposes; the method has been developed and
validated to determine the residues of cyhalofop-butyl, cyhalofop (acid
form) and the di-acid metabolite in rice grain, straw and processed
products. The method was based on capillary gas chromatography with mass
selective detection. Limits of detection were 0.005 or 0.006 ppm
depending on the analyte and matrix.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 3. *Magnitude of residues.* **A magnitude of residue
study was conducted at 18 sites in major rice growing regions at the
nominal proposed maximum use rates. Cyhalofop-butyl rapidly degrades to
cyhalofop and further to the amide and di-acid. Analytically, the ester
is included in the cyhalofop residue and the di-acid includes all
residues of the amide. There were no detections reported for cyhalofop
in rice grain, bran, and polished rice and no detections for the di-acid
in bran and polished rice. For rice hulls, residues were below the
respective LOQ values of 0.010 ppm for cyhalofop and 0.011 ppm for the
di-acid. Low residues were observed in the grain for the di-acid from ND
(\<0.005) to 0.013 ppm. For rice straw, residues ranged from ND
(\<0.006) to 0.19 ppm for cyhalofop and ND to 5.3 ppm for the di-acid.**

**[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}***B. Toxicological Profile* **The toxicological profile
and endpoints for cyhalofop-butyl which support this petition and
tolerances were previously published in the Federal Register of June 4,
2002 (67 FRL-7178-5)****. The relevant information is summarized
below.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 1. *Acute toxicity.* **No appropriate endpoint
attributable to a single dose was identified; the EPA has not
established an acute RfD for cyhalofop-butyl.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 2. *Genotoxicty.* **No evidence of genetic toxicity was
observed when cyhalofop-butyl was tested in a battery of in vitro and in
vivo tests.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 3. *Reproductive and developmental toxicity.*
**Cyhalofop-butyl did not have any effects on reproductive parameters at
dose levels that induced treatment-related effects in parental rats. In
addition, no teratogenic potential was demonstrated in either rats or
rabbits at dose levels that induced maternal toxicity.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 4. *Subchronic toxicity.* **Sub-chronic studies on
cyhalofop-butyl have been conducted and reviewed. No endpoint was
established for dermal exposure because no systemic effects were
observed in the 21-day dermal study in the rat at doses up to 1000
mg/kg/day. A short-term incidental NOAEL of 4.3 mg/kg/day was selected
as endpoint based on subchronic feeding study in mice; this endpoint was
also designated as conservative surrogate for inhalation exposures.
However, for the review of a tolerance, no short-term oral, dermal or
inhalation exposures are considered.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 5. *Chronic toxicity.* **A chronic reference dose (cRfD)
of 0.01 mg/kg/day has been established based on the 18-month feeding
study in mice and the application of an uncertainty factor of 100 (10X
for interspecies extrapolation and 10X for intra-species variation). A
1X FQPA safety factor was applied to the chronic endpoint. Thus in the
case of cyhalofop-butyl, the cPAD = cRfD = 0.01 mg/kg/day.**

**At the time of initial registration, the carcinogencity studies in
rats and mice showed no evidence of a tumorigenic response. But the
agency also concluded the original studies did not reach a maximum
tolerated dose and deemed them inadequate to assess carcinogenic
potential (Federal Register of June 4, 2002 (67 FRL-7178-5). The agency
recently reviewed additional information on peroxisome proliferation and
the lack of human relevance for liver tumors formed by this mode of
action. Per HED Memorandum TXR: 0054798 dated December 20, 2007 and in
accordance with the EPA Final Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
(March 29, 2005) the EPA has now has classified cyhalofop-butyl as "Not
Likely to Be Carcinogenic to Humans"**.

**At the time of registration, the agency created a holding time for
water based on the original uncertainty for cancer classification
coupled with estimates of drinking water concentrations using a modified
GENEEC approach for rice paddies and SCI-GROW. A 7-day holding time was
established to allow estimated concentrations of cyhalofop-butyl to fall
below 0.15 ppb. Based on the recent cancer reclassification and Table 6
of the June 4, 2002 Final Rule for Cyhalofop-butyl; Time-Limited
Pesticide Tolerance, the 7-day holding time is not needed.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 6. *Animal metabolism.* **Oral administration of
cyhalofop-butyl, results in rapid absorption, metabolism and excretion
in the dog and rat. The butyl ester form is rapidly hydrolyzed to the
acid form (cyhalofop) with no significant quantities of unchanged parent
in the plasma, tissues or excreta.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 7. *Metabolite toxicology*. **In all matrices (animal,
plant, environmental), cyhalofop-butyl is rapidly metabolized to the
acid form, cyhalofop. Hence mammalian toxicity studies inherently
include the acid metabolite as part of the study. Plant studies have
identified the di-acid as a major metabolite; the di-acid is more polar,
and less lipid soluble and is expected to be less toxic than the
parent.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 8. *Endocrine disruption*. **No evidence from any of the
studies indicates cyhalofop-butyl is an endocrine
disrupter.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}***C. Aggregate Exposure***[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}** 1. *Dietary exposure.* **Chronic exposure resulting from
agricultural use of cyhalofop-butyl on rice has been assessed for the US
population and sub-populations. The dietary assessment model DEEM-FCID
version 2.16 was employed. It estimates US consumption patterns based on
the Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) and EPA/USDA
translation recipes from August 2002. An estimate of the residue level
in each food (e.g., water or rice) is multiplied by the average daily
consumption estimate for that food. The resulting residue consumption
estimate for each food is summed to determine the total estimated
exposure. Exposure estimates are expressed in mg/kg body weight/day and
compared to the cPAD.**

[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} i. *Food.* **For cyhalofop-butyl, a DEEM residue file for a
Tier III dietary assessment was prepared using the average residue value
from field trials (0.0066 ppm) for rice. (The assessment comprehensively
includes the anticipated tolerance value of 0.03 ppm for wild rice as
recently supported by IR-4.) The exposure was assessed against a cPAD =
cRfD = 0.01 mg/kg/day.**

**The percent crop treated (PCT) assumption used in the original EPA
2002 assessment has been confirmed at 18% based on current marketing
data for Clincher\* herbicide. The average number of planted rice acres
over the last 3 year period is 3,214,000 acres. The average of the total
treated acreage (Doune Agrotrak 2006) has been conservatively adjusted
by a 1% retreatment to arrive at an average base acres treated of
590,049 acres. (It is estimated that between % 1 and \<5% of the treated
fields utilize the 2 applications of Clincher\* herbicide allowed on the
label.) The PCT calculated from current numbers is in excellent
agreement with original projections for maturity of sales used by the
EPA; the 2002 EPA projection was 17.6%, the revised number is 18.4%. A
rounded value of 18% PCT has been used as the second adjustment factor
in the DEEM file.**

**Results indicate exposure to cyhalofop-butyl residues is very low and
represents less than 0.1 % of the cRfD for all subpopulations. Without
the use of the PCT as the second adjustment factor, all exposures are
below 0.2% of the cPAD.**[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} ii. *Drinking water.* **Available monitoring data from two
studies supports the anticipated residue for cyhalofop-butyl in water
used in DEEM. In 2001, a surface water monitoring study in California
commenced just after initial Section 18 Specific Exemption applications.
Although fortified storage stability associated with the study indicated
the ester form was not stable under sampling and storage conditions of
this study (i. e. cyhalofop-butyl converted to cyhalofop (acid form)),
results indicated no sample had a concentration of either
cyhalofop-butyl or cyhalofop above the limit of detection (LOD) of 0.5
ppb. The results of the 2001 work are substantiated by a 2002 study with
lower analytical limits. Clincher\* CA herbicide was applied in
California in 2002 under a Section 18 Specific Exemption. The 2002
monitoring study was conducted at the time of maximum use of Clincher\*
herbicide in the Sacramento River Valley. The study monitored drinking
water for cyhalofop-buyl and the 3 principal metabolites (cyhalofop,
cyhalofop-di-acid and cyhalofop-amide). Water was sampled semiweekly
from April 30 to July 18. A total of 48 samples were collected and
analyzed. Method GRM 99.07 was modified to achieve a limit of
quantitification of (LOQ) of 0.1 ug/L (ppb). Neither cyhalofop-butyl nor
its metabolites were present in any of the drinking water samples above
the LOQ. The limits of detections (LOD) were 0.04 ppb for
cyhalofop-butyl, 0.01 ppb for cyhalofop (acid), 0.01 ppb for
cyhalofop-amide and 0.04 ppb for cyhalofop-di-acid. Only one sample in
48 had a detection above the LOD and only cyhalofop-butyl (no
metabolites) was noted in that sample. The general lack of detections is
understood in light of the known rapid degradation of cyhalofop-butyl
and its metabolites in the environment.**

**Based on the drinking water monitoring, 0.05 ppb (½ the LOQ) has been
incorporated as a single point estimate for both direct and indirect
water sources within DEEM. Dietary and water exposure were chronically
assessed against the cRfD of 0.01 mg/kg/day. All subpopulations have
exposure estimates of \< 0.1% cPAD. Comparison of DEEM output with and
without the water component demonstrates the additional water exposure
has minimal impact on the overall exposure assessment for all sub
populations.**[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} 2. *Non-dietary exposure*. **There are no residential uses
for this compound.**[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark}*D. Cumulative Effects*[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} **For purposes of this tolerance petition, no assumption of
a common mechanism of toxicity for cyhalofop-butyl with other substances
has been made.**[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark}*E. Safety Determination* **.** [\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} 1. *U.S. population.* **Based on the dietary and water
exposure assessments, chronic dietary exposure to cyhalofop-butyl from
registered uses in rice plus drinking water will utilize \<0.1% of the
cRfD for the U. S. population. Exposures below 100% of the cRfD are
typically below the EPA's level of concern because the chronic RfD
represents the level at or below which daily dietary exposures over a
lifetime will not pose appreciable risks to human health.**[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} 2. *Infants and children*. **Per Federal Register of June 4,
2002 (67 FRL-7178-5), EPA has previously determined that an FQPA safety
factor of 1X is applicable to all population subgroups for
cyhalofop-butyl. The major identifiable subgroup with the highest
chronic dietary exposure is "non-nursing infants" and "all infants (\<1
year)", but each are exposed to estimated residues of \<0.1 % of the
cPAD. Dow AgroSciences concludes with reasonable certainty that no harm
will result to infants and children from the aggregate exposure to
cyhalofop-butyl residues from registered and proposed uses.[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark}***F. International Tolerances***[\>]{.mark}**

**[\<]{.mark} A review of national websites and the Homologa MRL
database indicates several values have been set for cyhalofop in rice
globally. The US value of 0.03 ppm in rice is higher than values in
Europe and Latin America, but lower than values established in most of
the Pacific. No MRLs were noted by Codex.**

  ------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------
  **Argentina, Brazil, Australia, Turkey**          **Rice**   **0.01**   **PPM**

  **EU and various individual member states**       **Rice**   **0.02**   **PPM**

  **Japan, South Korea and Taiwan**                 **Rice**   **0.1**    **PPM**
  ------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------

**[\>\>]{.mark}**

[\<\>]{.mark}

**[\<\>]{.mark}**

[\<\<]{.mark}**List of Subjects**[\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed
additives, Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.[\>\>]{.mark}

[\<\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark}Dated: [\<]{.mark}\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_[\>]{.mark} [\>]{.mark}

[\<\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark} [\<]{.mark}\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_[\>\>]{.mark}

[\<\>]{.mark}

[\<Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.\>\>\>]{.mark}

[\<\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark}\[FR Doc. 08--?????? Filed ??--??--08; 8:45 am\][\>]{.mark}

[\<]{.mark}BILLING CODE 6560--50--S[\>\>\>]{.mark}