BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
**Table 9**. Example cartographic object codes used in the CartoPnts
table.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **CartoObjID**      **Name**
  ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
  2134                anticline symbol - color black (24K)

  2169                normal fault symbol - color black (1000K)

  2177                plunge arrowhead - color black (12K)

  2270                Small structural measurement label - color black
                      (24K)

  2270                Small unit label - color black (24K)

  2271                Large dike label - color black (250K)

  2271                Medium generic text label - color black (24K)

  2271                Medium structural measurement label - color red
                      (24K)
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Codes of Conduct CT

Updated December 5, 2008

Housing Authority of the City of Ansonia

36 Main Street

Ansonia CT 06401-

City of Bridgeport

999 Broad St., 2nd Floor

Bridgeport CT 06604-

Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport

150 Highland Avenue

Bridgeport CT 06604-

St. Vincent Depaul Society of Bristol, Inc.

19 Jacobs Street

Bristol CT 60111-

Micah Housing, Inc.

50 Nichols

Fairfield CT 6615 -

Housing Authority of the Town of Greenwich

249 Milbank Avenue

Greenwich CT 06830-

City of Hartford, Ct

131 Coventry Street

Hartford CT 06112-

Connecticut Fair Housing Center, Inc.

221 Main St.

Hartford CT 06106-

Housing Authority of the City of Hartford

180 Overlook Terrace

Hartford CT 06106-

Immaculate Conception Shelter & Housing

Corporation

P.O. Box 260669

Hartford CT 6126 -

Saint Francis Hospital And Medical Center

114 Woodland Street

Hartford CT 06105-

State of Connecticut Department of Social

Services

25 Sigourney Street

Hartford CT 06106-

Housing Authority of the City of Meriden

22 Church Street,P.O. 911

Meriden CT 06451-

Meriden Housing Authority

22 Church Street

Meriden CT 06451-

Alderhouse Residential Communities, Inc. (co-

sponsor)

363 Main Street, Ste 503

Middletown CT 06457-

The Connection Fund

955 South Main Street

Middletown CT 6457 -

City of New Britain

27 West Main Street

New Britain CT 06051-

Neighborhood Housing Services of New Britain, Inc.

223 Broad Street

New Britain CT 06053-

City of New Haven

54 Meadow Street, 9th Floor

New Haven CT 06519-

Hill Development Corp. of New Haven

649 Howard Avenue

New Haven CT 06519-

Housing Authority of The City of New Haven

360 Orange Street, P.O. Box

New Haven CT 06509-

Liberty Community Services, Inc.

254 College Street, 2nd Floor

New Haven CT 6510 -

St. Luke\'s Development Corporation (co-

sponsor)

111 Whalley Ave

New Haven CT 06511-

City of New London

181 State St.

New London CT 06320-

Bethesda Community, Inc.

225 Main Street

Norwalk CT 6360 -

Norwalk Emergency Shelter, Inc.

4 Merritt Street

Norwalk CT 6854 -

The Housing Authority of the City of Norwalk

24 1/2 Monroe Street

Norwalk CT 06856-

Thames River Community Service, Inc.

One Thames River Place

Norwich CT 6360 -

Mutual Housing Association of Southwestern

Connecticut, Inc.

62 Palmer\'s Hill Road

Stamford CT 6902 -

The Housing Authority City of Stamford

22 Clinton Avenue

Stamford CT 06904-

City of Waterbury

95 Scovill Street

Waterbury CT 06706-

Credo Housing Development Corporation Inc.

9 Barnes Street

Waterbury CT 6704 -

West Hartford Housing Corporation

80 Shield Street

West Hartford CT 06110-

Interfaith Housing Association

49 Richmondville Ave., #112

Westport CT 6880 -

The Access Agency, Inc.

1315 Main Street

Willimantic CT 06226-

Winsted Health Center Foundation, Inc. (co-

sponsor)

115 Spencer Street

Winsted CT 06098-
Statement of Work for Frontiers in Population Genomics Research

# September 27-28, 2007

The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) on behalf of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) is planning a two day conference to
be held on September 27-28, 2007. The goal of the meeting is to chart
future directions for NHGRI to pursue in population genomics, defined as
the application of genomic technologies to population studies, to meet
the goals of NHGRI and NIH in improving health and reducing disease.
Approximately 30 outside participants will be invited, along with 25 NIH
staff.

[Scope of work:]{.underline} The contractor will provide a range of
support services under this task order. These services will include:

-   Secure a hotel or other comparable meeting space for an estimated 55
    attendees with appropriate audio-visual capabilities. Venue should
    spaciously accommodate a set-up of hollow-square for 35 people with
    perimeter seating for up to 30.

-   Make arrangements for reservation of sleeping rooms for up to 30
    outside participants at the selected venue.

-   Make arrangements for light refreshment breaks (continental
    breakfast, am/pm breaks). In addition, the contractor will make
    arrangements for box lunches that can be purchased by attendees.

-   Make arrangements for all audio-visual needs, to include the
    following:

    -   LCD Projector

    -   Laptop Computer equipped with PowerPoint, Word, Internet
        Capabilities

    -   Data/Video Switcher\-- Ability to connect up to 30 laptops to
        LCD projector at one time so that participants may project from
        their seats as needed

    -   Microphones: 1 podium, 1 lavalier, 15 table top mics (approx. 1
        per every 3 participants), 2 standing mics

    -   Laser Pointer

    -   Power Strips set throughout the room

    -   AV Technician

-   Arranging travel, lodging, and reimbursement for up to 30
    participants; to include any travel by air, train, rental car, or
    mixed mode. Travelers will contact the contractor directly. NHGRI
    will provide a list of attendees for whom travel is authorized. All
    travel reimbursements must be paid within two weeks of receiving the
    traveler's voucher.

-   Handle advance registration for all attendees.

-   Serve as the point of contact for all attendees and speakers.

-   Create name badges, name tents and meeting folders/materials (e.g.
    participant list, agenda, identified articles).

-   Provide one personnel member to attend the meeting to handle the
    on-site registration desk and any last minute logistical details.

-   Additional tasks may be added to this order at a later date, as the
    initiator deems necessary.
**Statement of Work for Chordoma Workshop**

The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), in collaboration
with the Office of Rare Diseases (ORD), and the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) is planning a conference focused on Chordoma research.
The organizing group envisions a one-and-a-half day conference of
approximately 50-100 attendees to be held on May 3-4, 2007 at the
Bethesda North Marriott Conference Center.

[Scope of work:]{.underline} The contractor will provide a range of
support services under this task order. These services will include:

-   Handling the existing contract with the Bethesda North Marriott
    Conference Center. NHGRI currently has meeting rooms and sleeping
    rooms reserved for the meeting dates. The contract with the hotel
    will be transferred to the "Meeting Contractor" upon selection.

-   Arranging travel, lodging, and reimbursement for up to 20 speakers;
    to include any travel by air, train, rental car, or mixed mode.
    Travelers will contact the contractor directly. NHGRI will provide a
    list of attendees for whom travel is authorized. All travel
    reimbursements must be paid within two weeks of receiving the
    traveler's voucher.

-   Making arrangements for all refreshment breaks (am, pm).

-   Making arrangements for all audio visual needs with the venue.

-   Creating and maintaining an online registration system. Contractor
    will provide updated registration details and lists to project
    officer as requested.

-   Corresponding with meeting attendees to assist with logistical
    needs.

-   Possible coordination of a group dinner at a local restaurant. Meal
    to be paid for by attendees.

-   Printing of name badges, tent cards, and other necessary items.

-   Possible coordination and printing of meeting packets.

-   Providing at least one personnel member to attend the meeting to
    handle the on-site registration desk, any last minute travel
    changes, as well as make ground transportation arrangements for
    return to airports, etc.

-   Additional tasks may be added to this order at a later date, as the
    initiator deems necessary.
NY G83908

November 22, 2000

CLA-2-63:RR:NC:TA:349 G83908

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 6304.91.0040

Ms. Donna M. Dion

CVS Inc.

One CVS Drive

Woonsocket, RI 02895

RE: The tariff classification of a wallhanging from China.

Dear Ms. Dion:

In your letter dated November 1, 2000 you requested a classification
ruling.

The instant sample, identified as CVS item number 102035, is a
wallhanging. The wallhanging is shaped to resemble a butterfly. It is
comprised of a nylon knit fabric that covers a heavy gauge wire frame.
The wallhanging measures approximately 8.5 x 16.5 inches. There is a
small metal hook used to hang the item.

The applicable subheading for the wallhanging will be 6304.91.0040,
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), which provides
for other furnishings articles, excluding those of heading 9404: other:
knitted or crocheted\... of man-made fibers. The duty rate will be 8.1
percent ad valorem.

The wallhanging falls within textile category designation 666. Based
upon international textile trade agreements products of China are
subject to quota and the requirement of a visa.

The designated textile and apparel categories and their quota and visa
status are the result of international agreements that are subject to
frequent renegotiations and changes. To obtain the most current
information, we suggest that you check, close to the time of shipment,
the [U.S. Customs Service Textile Status Report]{.underline}, an
internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available at the
Customs Web site at www.customs.gov. In addition, the designated textile
and apparel categories may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and
quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected
and should also be verified at the time of shipment.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the
Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact
National Import Specialist John Hansen at 212-637-7078.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski

Director,

National Commodity

Specialist Division
![](media/image1.png){width="3.579861111111111in"
height="1.742361111111111in"}

**Registration for 2006 Annual Meeting**

Send form via e-mail attachment, fax, or regular mail to:

Jan Curtis, AASC Treasurer, by Friday May 19, 2006

E-mail <jan.curtis@por.usda.gov>

Fax: (503) 414-3101

Address: Jan Curtis, AASC Treasurer, 2571 NW 3^rd^ Terrace, Gresham, OR
97030

**Name:**

**Title:**

**State:**

**Phone: Fax:**

**E-Mail:**

Registration Package

> Includes Cash Bar, Chuckwagon Dinner,
>
> Luncheon and Coffee Breaks \_\_\_\_ @ \$160.00 = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_

Extra Tickets

> Chuckwagon Dinner Adults: \_\_\_\_ @ \$ 15.00 = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_

Children (over 3): \_\_\_\_ @ \$ 8.00 = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_

Meeting Luncheon \_\_\_\_ @ \$ 17.50 = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_

Dues

AASC Membership for 2006 \_\_\_\_ @ \$ 100 = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_

AASC Associate Membership for 2006 \_\_\_\_ @ \$ 40 = \$\_\_\_\_\_\_

**TOTAL:** Credit Card (On-Site) \$**\_\_\_\_\_**

Method of Payment:

Enclosed Check (Number\_\_\_\_\_\_) Make checks payable to AASC

Check being mailed separately

Credit Card (On-Site)

I would like an invoice
**[FINDINGS AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION]{.underline}**

**[OF THE FEDERAL MANAGEMENT REGULATION]{.underline}**

**[SUBPART B, SECTION 102-34.335]{.underline}**

**[PURPOSE]{.underline}**

The General Services Administration (GSA) Office of Governmentwide
Policy (M) is granting a deviation from section 102-34.335 of the
Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR 102-34.335) to all agencies
whose purchase of gasoline for motor vehicles has been impacted by
Hurricane Katrina, as further specified below. This deviation will allow
Federal agencies to purchase premium gasoline for government owned and
leased vehicles when lower grade gasoline is not available.

**[BACKGROUND]{.underline}**

FMR section 102-34.335 prohibits the use premium grade gasoline in any
motor vehicle owned or leased by the Government unless the motor vehicle
specifically requires premium grade gasoline. This section states that
drivers are to use the grade (octane rating) of gasoline recommended by
the motor vehicle manufacturer when fueling motor vehicles owned or
leased by the Government.

As a result of the catastrophic destruction caused by Hurricane Katrina,
agencies have reported that their vehicles operators are unable to
purchase lower octane gasoline for their vehicles to complete their
missions. In many areas, agencies have only been able to procure premium
gasoline for use in their motor vehicles. The original intent of section
102-34.335 was to reduce fuel costs and eliminate the unnecessary use of
premium gasoline in vehicles capable of being operated on lower grade
gasoline.

**[FINDINGS]{.underline}**

In certain cases, the ability of the Federal Government to obtain low
octane gasoline has been compromised by the damage caused by Hurricane
Katrina. Agency Fleet Managers need to complete their missions and
support disaster relief programs throughout the United States. Allowing
agencies to purchase premium gasoline if lower grade gasoline is not
available will significantly help them in procuring gasoline for all
their motor vehicles. In keeping with the original intent of section
102-34.335, agencies should be prudent in using premium gasoline only
when a lower grade is not available. As part of the fuel charge card
program, agencies should continue to routinely monitor the use of
premium fuel through monthly reports provided by their charge card
vendors.

**[DETERMINATION]{.underline}**

Based on the foregoing, I hereby grant a deviation from the requirement
in section 102-34.335 of the Federal Management Regulation that agencies
use only the octane rating of gasoline recommended by the motor vehicle
manufacturer where such grade of gasoline is not available. This
deviation allows the use of premium gasoline only if lower graded
gasoline is not available. This change in procedure is appropriate as we
continue to keep the needs of Federal drivers at the forefront of
completing the Government's mission. This deviation expires on March 1,
2006.

Approved:

September 8, 2005

G. Martin Wagner

Associate Administrator

Office of Governmentwide Policy (M)
**U.S. ATLAS M&O Estimate**

**WBS Profile Estimates**

**Funding** All **Funding Type:** Research Program + MR 1/23/2005
10:44:28 AM

**Institutions:** All **Estimate in Fixed FY\'05 \$k**
**Labor/Material:** Both

**WBS** **FY 03** **FY 04** **FY 05** **FY 06** **FY 07** **FY 08** **FY
09** **FY 10** **FY 11** **FY 12** **Total**

**Number** **Description** **(k\$)** **(k\$)** **(k\$)** **(k\$)**
**(k\$)** **(k\$)** **(k\$)** **(k\$)** **(k\$)** **(k\$)**

**3** **U.S. ATLAS M&O Estimate** 749 519 359 410 391 422 358 292 3500

**3.2** **TRT** 749 519 359 410 391 422 358 292 3500

**3.2.1** **TRT-Subsystem** 704 434 227 161 161 161 161 161 2170

**3.2.1.1** **TRT Pre-operations** 674 374 58 0 0 0 0 0 1106

**3.2.1.2** **Operations** 0 0 75 75 75 75 75 75 450

**3.2.1.3** **TRT Maintenance** 30 60 94 86 86 86 86 86 614

**3.2.2** **Common TRT/ID** 45 85 132 249 230 261 197 131 1329

**3.2.2.1** **Pre-Operations** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

**3.2.2.2** **Maintenance and operations (IU)** 45 85 132 249 230 261
197 131 1329

**3.2.2.3** **Maintenance and operations** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 1 of 1
National Coalition of Food Importing Associations

##### 3301 Route 66, Suite 205, Building C  Matawan, NJ 07753

**Phone 732-922-3008**  **Fax 732-922-3590**  **E-mail:
afi@afius.org**

# 

# 

# 

> May 12, 2004

## By Federal Express And Electronic Mail

Dockets Management Branch

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061

Rockville, Maryland 20852

> Re: Docket No. 2002N-0276 -- Registration of Food Facilities Under the
> Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act
> of 2002; Reopening of [Comment Period]{.underline}

The National Coalition of Food Importing Associations (NCFIA) is pleased
to submit comments to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the
Registration of Food Facilities Under the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002; Reopening of Comment
Period, 69 Fed. Reg. 19766 (April 14, 2003).

NCFIA is a coalition of trade associations that represent different
segments of the food importing community. Members of NCFIA include the
following associations: American Spice Trade Association, Cheese
Importers Association of America, Association of Food Industries, The
Cocoa Merchants' Association of America, and the National Fisheries
Institute. Companies belonging to NCFIA members annually import over
\$13.5 billion in food products.

In the notice reopening the comment period on the registration of food
facilities interim final rule, FDA poses several questions. FDA is
specifically seeking information regarding the costs to foreign
facilities to hire and retain a United States agent. FDA further is
asking for evidence of any foreign businesses that have ceased exporting
to the United States because of the registration requirement.

In NCFIA's experience, the costs and inconvenience to foreign facilities
to register and retain a United States agent have not been prohibitive.
NCFIA members have not had the personal experience of a potential
supplier declining to undertake importation into the United States due
to registration or agent concerns. While aspects of FDA's interim final
rules have increased the costs to do business in the United States,
NCFIA is not aware of any companies that have ceased doing business in
the United States because of the costs associated with registration and
acquisition of a U.S. agent.

NCFIA sincerely thanks FDA for its efforts to create a smooth and
workable facility registration system. Our members are committed to
continuing to work with FDA to assure a balance of food security needs
and commercial realities.

Very truly yours,

Richard H. Koby

Coalition Coordinator
# Archived Information

DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY (DECA)

VALUE OF PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN A UNIVERSITY AND AN URBAN HIGH SCHOOL

The Dayton Early College Academy is an innovative partnership between
the Dayton Public Schools, an urban district, and the University of
Dayton, a private, Catholic, four-year residential institution. Planning
for DECA began in the fall of 2002. DECA began its operation in the fall
of 2003. DECA is located on the campus of the University of Dayton in a
building that is leased from the NCR Corporation.

DECA is a non-traditional school in which there are no grade levels.
Students have individualized learning plans, do not receive letter
grades, participate in Gateways, set their own academic goals in
conjunction with the state academic content standards and in
collaboration with their advisors and parents, and participate in Ohio
high-stakes testing. One hundred first-year students are admitted per
year and will culminate with a total enrollment of 400 students by 2006.

Admission to DECA is open to students in the Dayton district entering
the ninth grade with reading proficiency at the sixth-grade level or
higher. Students can be no older than 15 and must demonstrate a passion
and interest for learning. They also must be drug-free. "Students are
first-generation college students from low-income families who are at
risk of dropping out of a traditional high school because they're not
challenged enough to stay" according to Dr. Thomas Lasley, Dean of the
School of Education and Allied Professions, University of Dayton.

-   **Opportunities within the Department of Teacher Education**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Content area Reading course

-   General support for the department

-   Opportunity for diversity experience

-   Urban Teacher Academy: Graduate License opportunity

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **Provides an opportunity for Arts & Science Professor
    partnerships.**

-   **Provides an opportunity to develop a true clinical faculty
    model**.

-   **Provides a campus like the University of Dayton an opportunity to
    recruit diverse students to the campus.**

-   **Provides the University and its corporate partners and opportunity
    to mentor the high school students.**

-   **Provides an opportunity to influence/develop school personnel for
    redelivery of education in an innovative high school. From the DECA
    faculty viewpoint, teachers can learn from experts in a variety of
    fields.**

-   **Provides an opportunity for faculty to do research/write grants
    with the teachers and students and DECA faculty who are involved in
    a project-based environment.**

-   **Provides an opportunity for the development of a college "culture"
    (important for students who live in communities where college is not
    an expectation).**

THE VERY PRESENCE OF THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ON THE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
CAUSES AN ENERGY AND EXCITEMENT.

Nov. 23, 2004
Mr. Harlan G. Sparrow III

Manager, National Simulator Program

100 Hartsfield Centre Parkway, Suite 400

Atlanta, GA 30354

Thru: (Local [TPAA Name)]{.underline}

## [(FAA Office)]{.underline}

## [(Street Address/PO Box)]{.underline}

## [(City, State, ZIP Code)]{.underline}

Dear Mr. Sparrow:

RE: **Qualification of a Flight Simulation Training Device Under the
Terms and Agreements of a Bilateral Agreement**

This is to advise you of our intent to request Federal Aviation
Administration qualification of the ([Aircraft Type/Level)]{.underline}
Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) located in [(City,
Country)]{.underline} at the [(Facility).]{.underline} We request the
FSTD receive qualification under the terms of the Simulator
Implementation Procedure (SIP) between the United States and [(National
Aviation Authority)]{.underline}. The FSTD will be sponsored by [(Name
of Training Center/Air Carrier)]{.underline}, FAA Designator [(Four
Letter Code)]{.underline}.

In accordance with FSTD Guidance Bulletin 04-02, we have enclosed a copy
of the FSTD Information Form and the latest ([NAA)]{.underline} FSTD
Evaluation Report. We understand both the (TPAA) and the National
Simulator Program (NSP) will review this request. In addition, the NSP
will provide notification of the results of the review within ten
working days of the receipt of this request. We also understand that the
qualification of FSTD's, under the provisions of a SIP, may be subject
to the collection of fees in accordance with Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14CFR) Part 187.

Sincerely, Local FAA TPAA:

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Sponsor Representative, Position) (Signature/Position/Date)

Enclosures:

FSTD Information Worksheet

([NAA)]{.underline} FSTD Evaluation Report
**[Floor Statement for H.R. 749]{.underline}**

I thank the gentleman for yielding. I would also like to thank Chairman
Oxley for taking up this bill so quickly in Committee and my colleague
from the other side of the aisle, Congressman Sherman, for his work and
support on behalf of this important legislation.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to encourage my colleagues to support H.R.
749, the *Expanded Access to Financial Services Act*. This bipartisan
legislation will amend the Federal Credit Union Act to permit credit
unions to offer money order, check-cashing and wire transfer services to
anyone who is eligible to be a credit union member, whether or not they
have credit union membership. The bill is identical to Section 307 of
H.R. 1375, the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act, which passed
the House by a vote of 392-25 on March 18, 2004.

H.R. 749 reaches out to individuals who, for whatever reason, do not
have established bank accounts. These "unbanked" Americans -- estimated
to be up to 10 million households -- are frequently charged high fees
for a variety of financial services. By bringing competition to the
marketplace, we can provide our constituents access to lower-fee
alternatives.

Many of those who would utilize these services are hard-working
immigrants trying to wire money home to help provide for their families.
According to the Pew Hispanic Center and Multilateral Investment Fund,
\$10 billion is sent back to Latin America each year, a figure that
could more than double in the next 5 years.

It is my hope that the underserved persons who are reached through this
bill will be able to use these services to establish a credit history
that can then allow them to take advantage of other financial services.
An initial positive experience with a depository institution may
encourage the "unbanked" to explore other financial products.

Further, bringing immigrant workers into financial institutions is
important for national security. Credit unions are required to follow
the record-keeping and reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act.
They must also determine that customers are in the field of membership,
a process that would involve personal documentation review. Having
international money transfers go through regulated financial
institutions makes it easier for law enforcement officials to learn of
and follow suspicious activity.

The Expanded Access to Financial Services Act has the support of the
National Credit Union Administration, Credit Union National Association
and National Association of Federal Credit Unions.

H.R. 749 is a good, bipartisan bill. It reaches out to communities that
have historically been left out of the financial services arena and
encourages hard-working Americans to develop relationships with
financial institutions. I hope that Members will choose today to give
their constituents access to affordable financial services.
![](media/image1.jpeg){width="5.5in" height="1.2333333333333334in"}

Release No. 0439.02

Jim Core (301) 504-1619

**GROUNDBREAKING FOR NEW BIOLOGICAL CONTROL LAB**

STONEVILLE, MISS., Oct. 15, 2002-- The U.S. Department of Agriculture's
Agricultural Research Service today hosted a groundbreaking ceremony
here for a new facility where researchers will develop methods for
rearing, storing and using beneficial organisms against agricultural and
urban pests.

The National Biological Control Laboratory (NBCL) will cost about \$16.5
million to build and is scheduled to open in December 2003. Research at
the facility will focus on developing beneficial predators, parasites
and microbes that farmers can use to control pests.

"Biocontrol makes up less than 1 percent of the pest control market in
the United States, despite its proven value," said Dr. Joe Jen,
undersecretary for Research Education and Economics. "The researchers
hope to develop practical methods for producing and distributing control
agents in quantities large enough to have significant impacts."

Jen and ARS Acting Administrator Ed Knipling participated in the
ceremony and U.S. Senator Thad Cochran was the keynote speaker. The
55,000-square-foot building will accommodate 50 scientists and support
personnel. It is uniquely designed to facilitate interaction among
scientists from numerous disciplines in basic and applied research. NBCL
will be the first facility in the world to have such a wide combination
of scientific specializations for fully integrated research in
biocontrol technology.

NBCL will have one wing reserved for microorganisms such as fungi or
bacteria and another for microorganisms such as nematodes and insects.
The wings are designed to prevent accidental release of these organisms.
Additional space is provided for two pilot plants where scientists can
cooperate with public and private organizations to test the practical
applications of rearing techniques and foster commercial production,
especially with small, start-up companies.

Only organisms that have been approved for release in the United States
by federal and state officials will be propagated and studied there.

\#
**SAMPLE NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING**

The Notice of Manual Filing should be efiled using the event for the
item you are filing in paper. Do not use the ANotice (Other)@ event. For
example, if you are filing exhibits manually, use the AExhibit@ event
and attach the pdf of the Notice of Manual Filing. Mail the exhibits
along with copies of the Notice of Electronic Filing and the Notice of
Manual filing to the Clerks Office.

Plaintiff **\[insert name here\]** ) Case No. **\[insert case number and
initials of**

> ) **presiding judge here\]**
>
> v\. )
>
> )

Defendant **\[insert name here\]** ) **Notice of Manual Filing**

Please take notice that **\[insert Name of Party\]** has manually filed
the **\[insert Title of Document or Thing\]**.

This document (or thing) **\[please note which option applies and delete
the other option\]** has not been filed electronically because: **\[mark
all that apply\]**

\[ \] the document (or thing) cannot be converted to an electronic
format

\[ \] the electronic file size of the document exceeds 5 mb

\[ \] The document (or thing) is filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule
of Civil Procedure 5(d), Local Rule of Criminal Procedure 57(b) or
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \' 3006A \[e.g., Motion for Expert or Other
Services\]

\[NOTE: DISK CONTAINING PDF VERSION OF SEALED OR EX PARTE DOCUMENT IS
REQUIRED UNLESS DOCUMENT CANNOT BE CONVERTED TO PDF FORMAT, DOCUMENT IS
LARGER THAN 5MB OR PARTY HAS BEEN EXCUSED FROM SUBMITTING DOCUMENT IN
PDF FORMAT.\]

\[ \] Plaintiff/Defendant is excused from electronically filing this
document (or thing) by court order.

The document (or thing) **\[delete document or thing depending on which
does not apply to this filing\]** has been manually served on all
parties.

> Respectfully submitted,
>
> **[/s/ \[Name of Password Registrant\]]{.underline}**
>
> Name of Password Registrant \[attorney=s federal bar number\]

Address

City, State, Zip Code

Phone: (xxx) xxx-xxxx

Fax: (xxx) xxx-xxxx

E-mail: xxx@xxx.xxx
Teaco

1981,Edwards Air Force Base,34.900,-117.867

1982,Denver,34.900,-117.867

1983,Boulder, 40.000, -105.267

1984, Parachute, CO, 39.450, -108.050

1985, Midland, TX, 31.983, -102.067

1986, Oshkosh, WI, 44.017, -88.533

1986, Denver, CO, 34.900, -117.867

1987, Denver, CO, 34.900, -117.867

September 1987, Moss Landing, CA, 36.800, -121.783

1987, Manhattan, KS, 39.200, -96.600

1987, Boulder, CO, 40.000, -105.267

1988, Mauna Loa, HI, 19.467, -155.583

July -- August 1988, Battersby, Ontario, Canada,47.182,-81.749

1989, Mountain View, CA, 37.383, -122.067

1989, Erie, CO, 40.050, -105.033

1990, Mountain View, CA, 37.383, -122.067

January -- March 1990, Grand Canyon, AZ, 36.050, -112.133

1991, White Sands Missile Range, NM, 32.883, -106.200

1991, Coffeyville, KS, 37.033, -95.600

1991, Dugway Proving Ground, UT, 40.21, -112.733

1991, Kennedy Space Center, FL, 28.667, -80.667

February -- March 1991, Denver, CO, 34.900, -117.867

1992, White Sands Missile Range, NM, 32.883, -106.200

1993, San Clemente Island, CA, 33.417, -117.600

July -- August 1993, Vancouver, British Columbia, 49.217, -123.100

1993, Dugway Proving Ground, UT, 40.21, -112.733

1993, Kennedy Space Center, FL, 28.667, -80.667

December 1993, White Sands Missile Range, NM, 32.883, -106.200

July 1994, Nevada Test Site, NV, 36.800, -116.283

1994, Lamont, OK, 36.683, -97.550

January -- March 1997, Colorado Springs, CO, 38.833, -104.817

October -- November 1999, Innsbruck, Austria, 47.267, 11.400

August -- September 2000, Houston, TX, 29.750, -95.350

October 2000, Salt Lake City, UT, 40.750, -111.883

HRDL

April - May1995, Monterey, CA, 36.600, -121.883

August1996, Champaign, IL, 40.100, -88.233

November 1998 -- January 1999, Boulder, CO, 40.000, -105.267

January 1999, Huntsville, AL, 34.717, -86.583

October 1999, Leon KS, 37.683, -96.767

May 2001, Los Angeles, CA, 34.050, -118.233

mini-MOPA

April 1996, Ponca City, OK, 36.700, -97.083

November1998 -- January1999, Boulder, CO, 40.000, -105.267

June/July 1999, Nashville, TN, 36.167, -86.750

March -- May 2000, Boulder, CO, 40.000, -105.267

September 2000, New Hampshire, 42.100, -73.433

July -- August 2002, Rye Harbor, NH, 43.000, -70.733

OPAL

July 1993, Davis, CA, 38.533, -121.733

September 1993, Los Angeles, CA, 34.050, -118.233

August 1995, Victorville, CA, 34.533, -117.283

August 1996, Champaign, IL, 40.100, -88.233

June -- October 1997, El Monte, CA, 34.067, -118.017

June -- July 1999, Nashville, TN, 36.167, -86.750

August 1999, Atlanta, GA, 33.733, -84.383

August -- September, 2000, Houston, TX, 29.750, -95.350

May 2001 -- Los Angeles, CA, 34.050, -118.233
**Sample Letter of Compliance**

([Date]{.underline})

Mr. ([Name of Training Program Approval Authority]{.underline}):

( [Name of FAA FSDO]{.underline})

([Address]{.underline})

([City/State/Zip]{.underline})

Dear Mr. ([Name of TPAA]{.underline}):

**RE: Letter of Compliance**

([Operator Sponsor Name]{.underline}) requests evaluation of our
([Aircraft Type]{.underline}) simulator for Level
([6/A/B/C/D]{.underline}) qualification. The ([Simulator Mfgr.
Name]{.underline}) simulator with ([Visual System Mfgr.
Name/Model]{.underline}) system is fully defined on the Simulator
Information page of the accompanying Qualification Test Guide (QTG). We
have completed the tests of the simulator and certify that it meets all
applicable requirements of FAR ([121, or 125, or 135]{.underline}), and
the guidance of ([AC 120-40B or 14 CFR Part 60]{.underline}).
Appropriate hardware and software configuration control procedures have
been established. Our Pilot(s), ([Name(s))]{.underline}, who are
qualified on ([Aircraft Type]{.underline}) aircraft have assessed the
simulator and have found that it conforms to the
([Operator/Sponsor]{.underline}) ([Aircraft Type]{.underline}) cockpit
configuration and that the simulated systems and subsystems function
equivalently to those in the aircraft. The above named pilot(s) have
also assessed the performance and the flying qualities of the simulator
and find that it represents the respective aircraft.

([Added Comments may be placed here]{.underline})

Sincerely,

([Sponsor Representative]{.underline})

cc:

FAA, National Simulator Program
![](media/image1.wmf)

**News Release**

**US Army Corps** 12565 West Center Road Contact: Paul Johnston

**of Engineers** Omaha, Nebraska 68144-3869 (402) 697-2552

Northwestern Division Larry Cieslik

Public Affairs Office (402) 697-2675

Phone: (402) 697-2552 Date: July 25, 2003

Fax: (402) 697-2554

######## Corps maintains flows from Missouri River dams

OMAHA -- The Army Corps of Engineers announced today that releases from
the Missouri River dams will remain at 25,000 cubic feet second (cfs) in
accordance with the 2003 supplemental biological opinion issued by the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in April.

Thursday, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, meeting in
Portland, Maine, consolidated all district court lawsuits pertaining to
the operation of the Missouri River dams and transferred them to Judge
Paul Magnuson of the U.S. District Court for Minnesota. Judge Magnuson
has stayed all proceedings in these lawsuits for14 days.

"The Corps has been faced with conflicting court rulings," said Brig.
Gen. William Grisoli, Northwestern Division Engineer. The District Court
in Nebraska ruled that the Corps must release sufficient water to meet
downstream purposes in accordance its current Master Water Control
Manual. The District Court in Washington, D.C. ruled July 12 that
releases must be reduced to prevent harm to fish and birds listed for
protection under the Endangered Species Act.

On the Missouri River, the Endangered Species Act lists the interior
least tern as endangered and the piping plover as threatened. "The terns
and plovers along the Missouri are enjoying a fantastic nesting year,"
said General Grisoli.

The Corps has a comprehensive program that identifies each interior
least tern and piping plover nest along the river, records its location
with GPS equipment and monitors and records the number of eggs in each
nest, the number that hatch and the number of chicks that reach flight
stage. This is the fourth consecutive record year for plovers and the
second highest on record for terns.

By Aug. 15 each year, the birds' reproduction cycle is complete and both
species leave the Missouri to migrate south.

The Department of the Army places a very high priority on the completion
of the Master Manual process and intends to implement a new manual in
Spring 2004. Public review by individuals and organizations is a major
part of the process and is welcomed and appreciated.

"Our goal remains to develop a plan that fulfills the congressionally
authorized purposes of the reservoir system, balances the competitive
needs of the basin and fully complies with all applicable laws,
including the Endangered Species Act," said General Grisoli.

-30-
BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY

**TECHNOLOGY MATURATION PROPOSAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE**

# INSTRUCTIONS

> The ***Technology Development*** section under the **Project
> Description** may include the motivation for the project, the
> fundamental problem to be solved, the approach to be taken and why it
> should work, and what a successful outcome would look like. Include a
> description of the technical development expected. In the ***Project
> Plan*** section, describe the tasks to be completed as well as any
> deliverables or milestones. Include timing, probability of success,
> and assignment of personnel, services, and property. **Milestones
> should be demonstrable at least semiannually; quarterly is
> preferred**.

**PROJECT DESCRIPTION**

***Technical Development***

What will we have when we are done? Is this all the work anticipated to
be required to enable the technology for commercialization? What are the
technical risks in the proposed project (i.e. that could result in
failure to achieve stated objectives)?

***Project Plan***

Task/stage 1: Name Project

-   *Deliverables*: Project name

-   *Duration of task or task end date*: 1 to 3 months

-   *Personnel, services, and property required*: principal
    investigators, post-doc 1, copy services, whiteboard

-   *Task-specific risk and probability of success*: Delay in hiring a
    post-doc is the biggest foreseeable impediment to success, however
    the likelihood of succeeding within three months is at least 95%.

Task 2: Hire post-doc 1

-   *Deliverables*: Employment agreement signed by post-doc 1

-   *Duration of task or task end date*: several months, but it can be
    done in parallel with other tasks

-   *Personnel, services, and property required*: PIs, other members of
    project team, announcement of position, reimbursement of expenses
    for interview trip

-   *Task-specific risk and probability of success*: We are almost sure
    to find a post-doc. It could take a long time, though, and we risk
    losing out on good candidates if our hiring cycle takes too long.

Task 3: Build furnace

-   *Deliverables*: working furnace

-   *Duration of task or task end date*: one month from post-doc 1's
    arrival

-   *Personnel, services, and property required*: post-doc 1,
    supervising PI (small fraction), machine shop access, outer shells
    for the furnace, two ceramic liners for the furnace, glass wool,
    insulating paste

-   *Task-specific risk and probability of success*: Again, time is the
    real issue. This task depends on successful completion of Task 2, so
    we cannot work in parallel with it except to order materials.
#####  DA 00-2833

Released: December 15, 2000

**OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DECLARES ASCOM WIRELESS SOLUTIONS
INC. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PART 15 FOR OPERATION IN THE 1910-1920 MHZ
BAND TO BE A \"PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSE\" PROCEEDING FOR *EX PARTE*
PURPOSES**

> On September 13, 2000, Ascom Wireless Solutions Inc. (\"Ascom\"),
> Petition for Waiver of Sections 15.319 and 15.321 of the Commission\'s
> rules to permit operation of Ascom\'s unlicensed personal
> communications service (\"PCS\") isochronous devices in the 1910-1920
> MHz band for the purpose of providing wireless telephone service
> within Cook County, Illinois, New York County, New York, San Francisco
> County, California, and Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.
>
> Unlicensed PCS (\"UPCS\") operation is permitted in the 1910-1920 MHz
> band under Part 15 of the Commission\'s regulations. Operation in the
> 1910-1920 MHz band is limited to use by asynchronous devices.
> Asynchronous devices transmit at irregular intervals, as is typical of
> packet data applications. The Wireless Information Networks Forum has
> filed a petition for rule making, RM-9498, requesting that isochronous
> UPCS devices be permitted to use the 1910-1920 MHz band in combination
> with the adjacent 1920-1930 MHz band. Isochronous UPCS devices
> typically have a fixed frame structure and transmit regular, periodic
> signals, such as time-division voice systems.
>
> The Commission\'s Office of Engineering and Technology (\"OET\") is
> reviewing Ascom\'s request to determine whether a waiver of the rules
> should be granted. OET seeks comments from interested parties
> concerning this waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to
> permit a fuller exchange on the issues under consideration in this
> proceeding, it should be treated, for *ex parte* purposes, as a
> \"permit-but-disclose\" proceeding, in accordance with Section
> 1.1200(a) of the Commission\'s rules, and is subject to the
> requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission\'s rules.
>
> Interested parties filing comments or oppositions to this petition are
> invited to do so no later than January 16, 2001. Parties filing
> replies may do so by January 31, 2001. All filings should be submitted
> to the Office of the Secretary and must include the above referenced
> DA number. For further information on this waiver request, contact
> Rodney Conway, Office of Engineering and Technology, via phone at
> (202)418-2904, e-mail at rconway@fcc.gov or TTY (202) 418-2989.

\- By the Office of Engineering and Technology -
------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------
  **ESEA: Impact Aid  
  Basic Support       
  Payments**          

  **FY 2008 Program   
  Performance Plan**  

  Strategic Goal 1    

  Formula             

  ESEA, Section       
  8003(b)             

  CFDA                84.041: Impact Aid
  ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------

  -------------- --------------------------------------------------------
  **Program      **To provide appropriate financial assistance for
  Goal:**        federally connected children who present a genuine
                 burden to their school districts**

  -------------- --------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
  ***Objective 1 of 1:***   *Make payments in a timely manner.*

  ------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------- ---------------- ------------------- ---------------------------
  **Measure 1.1 of 1:**                                        
  The percentage of                                            
  eligible applicants who                                      
  receive initial Impact                                       
  Aid Basic Support                                            
  payments within 60 days                                      
  after the enactment of                                       
  an appropriation.                                            
    (Desired direction:                                        
  increase)   1837                                             

  **Year**                **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                           (or date            
                                           expected)**         

  2005                                     94                  Measure not in place

  2006                    90               87                  Did Not Meet Target

  2007                    90               94                  Target Exceeded

  2008                    90               (December 2008)     Pending
  ----------------------- ---------------- ------------------- ---------------------------

**Source**. U.S. Department of Education, Impact Aid Basic Support
payments, Impact Aid data system.

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual
**Astrobiological potential of icy Worlds**

John C. Priscu

*Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences*

*Montana State University*

*Bozeman, MT 59717*

*U.S.A..*

jpriscu@montana.edu

Goals for space exploration over the coming decades place a strong focus
on the search for life in the universe. Accordingly, NASA has outlined
ambitious plans to investigate environments relevant to possible extinct
or extant life on other icy worlds. These plans include sending
spacecraft and rovers to such places as Mars and Europa to return
scientific information about these icy worlds and to gain insights into
their life support potentials. The icy regions of our own planet provide
important analogues that will allow scientists to assess the potential
for life on other icy worlds, to design tools to study such life, and to
develop decontamination protocols so that extraterrestrial sampling
efforts will yield unequivocal results. Antarctica, in particular,
provides us with an Earthly analogue owing to the presence of a
diversity of cold saline lakes, deep permafrost, extensive glacial ice,
and deep subglacial environments. Based on research results from Earth's
polar regions, we now know believe that microbial life can exist within
grain boundaries of solid ice, within the dirty layers of permanent lake
ice and glaciers, within the surface snow at the South Pole, and as deep
as 4 km beneath the surface of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet in systems
such as Lake Vostok.

Importantly, cellular macromolecules, such as nucleic acids, have been
shown to be well preserved within Earth's ice sheets making them
potential ice museums for the study of microbial evolution and survival.
Recent models have predicted that active cells can survive over hundreds
of thousands of years at temperatures reaching -40°C in a mode of
maintenance metabolism (i.e., they are not capable of increasing their
numbers but they can produce enough metabolic energy to maintain the
integrity of DNA and essential proteins). These models have been
corroborated by the discovery of microorganisms on Earth that have been
revived following several million years of captivity within permafrost
and other icy environments. These findings have implications for the
potential life in the martian ice caps, which are thought to be \~100
million years old.

This presentation will bring together salient points of what is known
about the environments on Mars and Europa with data from Earth's icy
regions to draw conclusions about the astrobiological potential of these
extraterrestrial worlds.