##### *2005-2006 No Child Left Behind - Blue Ribbon Schools Program*

*U.S. Department of Education*

**Cover Sheet** Type of School: (Check all that apply) [X]{.underline}
Elementary \_\_ Middle \_\_ High \_\_ K-12 \_\_Charter

Name of Principal [Ms. Beverly Hayes]{.underline}

(Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other) (As it should appear in the
official records)

Official School Name [Ira Harbison School .]{.underline}

(As it should appear in the official records)

School Mailing Address [3235 E. 8^th^ Street .]{.underline}

(If address is P.O. Box, also include street address)

[National City California 91950-3116 .]{.underline}

City State Zip Code+4 (9 digits total)

County [San Diego]{.underline} State School CodeNumber\*
[37-68221-6038764 .]{.underline}

Telephone [( 619 ) 336-8200]{.underline} Fax [( 619 )
336-8255]{.underline}

Website/URL [http://nsd.us/schools/iraharbison/]{.underline} E-mail
[beverly.hayes@national.k12.ca.us .]{.underline}

I have reviewed the information in this application, including the
eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my
knowledge all information is accurate.

Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Principal's Signature)

Name of Superintendent\* [Dr. George Cameron .]{.underline}

(Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other)

District Name [National School District]{.underline} Tel. [( 619 )
336-7500]{.underline}

I have reviewed the information in this application, including the
eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my
knowledge it is accurate.

Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
(Superintendent's Signature)

Name of School Board

President/Chairperson Mrs. Rosalie Alvarado

(Specify: Ms., Miss, Mrs., Dr., Mr., Other)

I have reviewed the information in this package, including the
eligibility requirements on page 2, and certify that to the best of my
knowledge it is accurate.

Date\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(School Board President's/Chairperson's Signature)

**PART I ‑ ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION**

**\[Include this page in the school's application as page 2.\]**

The signatures on the first page of this application certify that each
of the statements below concerning the school\'s eligibility and
compliance with U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights
(OCR) requirements is true and correct.

1.  The school has some configuration that includes grades K-12.
    (Schools with one principal, even K-12 schools, must apply as an
    entire school.)

2.  The school has not been in school improvement status or been
    identified by the state as \"persistently dangerous\" within the
    last two years. To meet final eligibility, the school must meet the
    state's adequate yearly progress requirement in the 2005-2006 school
    year.

3.  If the school includes grades 7 or higher, it has foreign language
    as a part of its core curriculum.

4.  The school has been in existence for five full years, that is, from
    at least September 2000 and has not received the 2003, 2004, or 2005
    *No Child Left Behind -- Blue Ribbon Schools Award.*

5.  The nominated school or district is not refusing the OCR access to
    information necessary to investigate a civil rights complaint or to
    conduct a district‑wide compliance review.

6.  The OCR has not issued a violation letter of findings to the school
    district concluding that the nominated school or the district as a
    whole has violated one or more of the civil rights statutes. A
    violation letter of findings will not be considered outstanding if
    the OCR has accepted a corrective action plan from the district to
    remedy the violation.

7.  The U.S. Department of Justice does not have a pending suit alleging
    that the nominated school, or the school district as a whole, has
    violated one or more of the civil rights statutes or the
    Constitution\'s equal protection clause.

8.  There are no findings of violations of the Individuals with
    Disabilities Education Act in a U.S. Department of Education
    monitoring report that apply to the school or school district in
    question; or if there are such findings, the state or district has
    corrected, or agreed to correct, the findings.

**PART II ‑ DEMOGRAPHIC DATA**

**All data are the most recent year available.**

**DISTRICT** (Questions 1‑2 not applicable to private schools)

1\. Number of schools in the district: [10]{.underline} Elementary
schools

\_\_\_\_\_ Middle schools

\_\_\_\_\_ Junior high schools

\_\_\_\_\_ High schools

\_\_\_\_\_ Other

[10]{.underline} TOTAL

2\. District Per Pupil Expenditure: [\$6,643]{.underline}

Average State Per Pupil Expenditure: [\$6,919]{.underline}

**SCHOOL** (To be completed by all schools)

3\. Category that best describes the area where the school is located:

> \[ \] Urban or large central city
>
> \[ X\] Suburban school with characteristics typical of an urban area
>
> \[ \] Suburban
>
> \[ \] Small city or town in a rural area
>
> \[ \] Rural

4\. [6]{.underline} Number of years the principal has been in her/his
position at this school.

If fewer than three years, how long was the previous principal at this
school?

5\. Number of students as of October 1 enrolled at each grade level or
its equivalent in applying school only:

  ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- --------- -- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
  **Grade**   **\# of   **\# of                **Grade      **Grade**   **\# of   **\# of     **Grade
              Males**   Females**              Total**                  Males**   Females**   Total**

  **PreK**                                                  **7**                             

  **K**       26        34                     **60**       **8**                             

  **1**       42        36                     **78**       **9**                             

  **2**       39        38                     **77**       **10**                            

  **3**       46        32                     **78**       **11**                            

  **4**       43        52                     **95**       **12**                            

  **5**       55        60                     **115**      **Other**                         

  **6**       52        42                     **94**                                         

                                    **TOTAL                                                   597
                                    STUDENTS                                                  
                                    IN THE                                                    
                                    APPLYING                                                  
                                    SCHOOL →**                                                
  ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- --------- -- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------

***\[Throughout the document, round numbers to avoid decimals.\]***

6\. Racial/ethnic composition of [4]{.underline} % White

the students in the school: [5]{.underline} % Black or African American

[58]{.underline} % Hispanic or Latino

[32]{.underline} % Asian/Pacific Islander/Filipino

[1]{.underline} % American Indian/Alaskan Native

**100% Total**

Use only the five standard categories in reporting the racial/ethnic
composition of the school.

7\. Student turnover, or mobility rate, during the past year:
[17]{.underline} %

> \[This rate should be calculated using the grid below. The answer to
> (6) is the mobility rate.\]

  ------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------
  **(1)**                   Number of students who      50
                            transferred ***to*** the    
                            school after October 1      
                            until the end of the year.  

  **(2)**                   Number of students who      54
                            transferred ***from*** the  
                            school after October 1      
                            until the end of the year.  

  **(3)**                   Total of all transferred    104
                            students \[sum of rows (1)  
                            and (2)\]                   

  **(4)**                   Total number of students in 605
                            the school as of October 1  

  **(5)**                   Total transferred students  0.17
                            in row (3) divided by total 
                            students in row (4)         

  **(6)**                   Amount in row (5)           17
                            multiplied by 100           
  ------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------

8\. Limited English Proficient students in the school: [45]{.underline}
%

[267]{.underline} Total Number Limited English Proficient

Number of languages represented: [5]{.underline}

Specify languages: Spanish, Tagalog/Pilipino, Samoan, Khmer, Kurdish

9\. Students eligible for free/reduced-priced meals: [100]{.underline} %

Total number students who qualify: [597 (2005-06)]{.underline}

> If this method does not produce an accurate estimate of the percentage
> of students from low‑income families or the school does not
> participate in the federally‑supported lunch program, specify a more
> accurate estimate, tell why the school chose it, and explain how it
> arrived at this estimate.

10\. Students receiving special education services: [10]{.underline} %

[60]{.underline} Total Number of Students Served

> Indicate below the number of students with disabilities according to
> conditions designated in the Individuals with Disabilities Education
> Act. Do not add additional categories.

[4]{.underline} Autism [2]{.underline} Orthopedic Impairment

\_\_\_\_Deafness [1]{.underline} Other Health Impaired

\_\_\_\_Deaf-Blindness [22]{.underline} Specific Learning Disability

\_\_\_\_Emotional Disturbance [28]{.underline} Speech or Language
Impairment

\_\_\_\_Hearing Impairment \_\_\_\_Traumatic Brain Injury

> [3]{.underline} Mental Retardation \_\_\_\_Visual Impairment Including
> Blindness
>
> \_\_\_\_Multiple Disabilities

11. Indicate number of full‑time and part‑time staff members in each of
    the categories below:

    **Number of Staff**

**[Full-time]{.underline}** **[Part-Time]{.underline}**

Administrator(s) [1]{.underline} [0]{.underline}

Classroom teachers [26]{.underline} [3]{.underline}

Special resource teachers/specialists [2]{.underline} [3]{.underline}

Paraprofessionals [1]{.underline} [18]{.underline}

> Support staff [5]{.underline} [12]{.underline}
>
> Total number [35]{.underline} [36]{.underline}

12. Average school student-"classroom teacher" ratio, that is, the
    number of

students in the school divided by the FTE of classroom teachers:
[23]{.underline}

13\. Show the attendance patterns of teachers and students as a
percentage. The student dropout rate is defined by the state. The
student drop-off rate is the difference between the number of entering
students and the number of exiting students from the same cohort. (From
the same cohort, subtract the number of exiting students from the number
of entering students; divide that number by the number of entering
students; multiply by 100 to get the percentage drop-off rate.) Briefly
explain in 100 words or fewer any major discrepancy between the dropout
rate and the drop-off rate. Only middle and high schools need to supply
dropout rates and only high schools need to supply drop-off rates.

  ------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
                            2004-2005   2003-2004   2002-2003   2001-2002   2000-2001

  Daily student attendance  97%         96%         96%         95%         95%

  Daily teacher attendance  92%         94%         95%         \*95%       \*95%

  Teacher turnover rate     7%          11%         14%         4%          11%
  ------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

\* Estimated-No Data Available

**PART III ‑ SUMMARY**

[Vision Statement]{.underline}

> The Ira Harbison School Community is committed to excellence for all
> children. Our shared goal is to ensure literacy, instill personal
> responsibility and celebrate diversity. In achieving this goal, our
> students develop into literate, self-directed learners and become
> successful citizens who contribute positively in a global society.

Ira Harbison School is a diverse community united in its mission of
learning. Academic excellence is our first priority because we believe
*all students can and will succeed!* We are committed to providing a
quality educational program for all of our students so they will become
lifelong learners. Our curriculum and instruction is designed to bring
out students' best thinking and learning.

Located 12 miles north of the U.S.-Mexican border, in the northeast
corner of National City, Ira Harbison is one of ten elementary schools
in National School District. Our ethnically diverse population of
approximately 600 students is comprised of 58% Hispanic, 29% Filipino,
5% African-American, 4% White, 3% Pacific Islander/Asian and 1% American
Indian/Alaskan Native students. Since 1992, one hundred percent of our
children have qualified for the free breakfast/lunch program.

Our school was built in 1950 and despite its age, it is a very
attractive and well-maintained campus. Our library not only serves our
students on site, it is also networked with other district schools and
the National City Public Library. Each classroom has at least five fully
networked computers. In addition, for student use, we have a 32-station
computer lab and as awardees of a technology grant, we received 30
state-of-the-art laptops.

We use the California State Content Standards to provide a clear
definition of what all students should know. As we continue to raise the
bar for our students, Ira Harbison remains the pacesetter for our
district. In 2002 we received a *Title I Achieving Schools Award*. In
2003 we were cited by EdSource as a *\"Beating the Odds\"* school, and
in 2004 we became a California Distinguished School. We have
strategically designed programs that dramatically impact the growth and
development of our students. Early interventions, including Before and
After School programs, computer programs and reading incentive programs,
have had a positive effect on student achievement.

Teachers frequently work beyond the regular teaching day, attending
trainings, selecting instructional materials, planning standards-based
instruction, setting goals and tutoring students. Evening programs are
regularly scheduled to keep parents informed and involved in their
children's education. These programs include: Back-to-School Night,
Family Math Nights, Family Science Nights, Parent Institute and Open
House.

Though the percentage of our students living below the poverty level is
twice that of the national average, their 97% attendance rate shows our
families' commitment to education. Some students enter our school not
speaking English and not having the necessary academic skills to
succeed. We view this as a challenge and we provide interventions
required to ensure our students' academic success.

We have a close knit community that takes pride and ownership in our
school. Parents are an invaluable resource to our school. They are
actively involved in a wide variety of school activities, working with
students in classrooms and on special projects in the Parent Center,
fundraising with the Parent, Teacher, and Student Organization and
volunteering for special school events. A unique feature of our school,
which creates a strong sense of community, is the fact that many of our
parents, grandparents and staff members are former Ira Harbison
students.

We strongly believe that all students can and will succeed. We also
believe in our school slogan "Excellence for All!"

**PART IV -- INDICATORS OF ACADEMIC SUCCESS**

**1. Assessment Results:** The State of California expects all students
to score at the proficient level or above on the *California Standards
Tests* (CST). We are making significant progress toward meeting that
goal. The *California Standards Tests* are criterion-referenced tests
that measures mastery of the state adopted content standards for grades
2-6. The CST is administered as close as possible to the date in which
85% of the school year's instructional days are completed. Student
performance is evaluated as *Far Below Basic, Below Basic, Basic,
Proficient or Advanced* and is reported for each individual student, by
subgroups and school-wide. Our students have made consistent growth in
both language arts and math. An analysis of our data gives us great
pride when we note that over the past four years all grade levels have
increasing numbers of students moving to and beyond proficiency. In
several grade levels scores have increased over 20 percent in both
language arts and math. Over 50 percent of all students in all grades
are at the proficient and above level in math. This growth is reflected
in the results of all subgroups. Even though results across subgroups
vary, with the Filipino subgroup scoring highest, growth is consistent
across all subgroups. Despite the challenges faced by our English
Learners, they too have made significant progress towards proficiency.
Our school's test results have exceeded those of our own district and
the state.

Another component of the California Standardized Testing and Reporting
(STAR) Program (<http://star.cde.ca.gov/>) is the California Achievement
Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6). The CAT6 is a Nationally Norm-Referenced Test
(NRT) in compliance with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act for
measuring progress toward national standards. Our school's scores are
reported as the percentage of students scoring at or above the 50^th^
percentile ranking which is considered at or above grade level. The CAT6
has been administered for the past three years, though only to third
grade students in 2004-05. The prior test, the Stanford Achievement
Test, Ninth Edition (SAT9) does not provide a valid comparison to CAT6.
Although our scores show growth, math is significantly higher than
reading. In the last year that the CAT6 was administered school-wide, an
average of the grade level scores shows that 43% of students scored at
or above grade level in reading while 61% scored at or above grade level
in math. Once again, our school's results have exceeded those of our own
district and the state.

California monitors progress of academic performance using the Academic
Performance Index (API). A numeric index, with 800 being the goal set by
the state, is assigned to each school to reflect results of the STAR
testing. Ira Harbison has shown solid, steady growth as we approach the
magic mark of 800 with a score of 775 in 2005. Our Filipino subgroup has
exceeded the goal with a score of 847 and our lowest subgroup is moving
upward with a respectable score of 738.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federal requirement of the NCLB Act
of 2001. Progress is determined by student participation rate,
proficiency in language arts and math, and API. Since the enactment of
NCLB requirements, we have more than met the proficiency levels for all
of our students and subgroups. Proficiency in language arts and math is
determined by the percentage of students exceeding the NCLB
requirements. The target percentage for 2003 and 2004 was 14 for
language arts and 16 for math. The percentage of our students exceeding
requirements in language arts was 36 in 2003 and 40 in 2004. In math,
the percentages were 51 and 53, respectively. In 2005, the targets were
raised to 24 for language arts and 27 for math. Ira Harbison's students
met the challenge with percentages of 44 in language arts and 58 in
math.

**\
2. Using Assessment Results:** Assessment is an integral part of our
instructional program and is used to guide our instruction. We have been
successful in meeting the needs of our students because we analyze
available data and use it to plan instruction and interventions. We look
at data from the whole school and subgroups including grade level,
ethnicity, special education, Gifted and Talented Education (GATE), "at
risk," primary language, as well as individual students. This lets us
target students with specific instructional needs. Those students are
offered additional opportunities during and beyond the school day to
strengthen their literacy and math skills.

We monitor, evaluate and sustain our program's effectiveness using
current data from Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) which
includes the California Achievement Test, 6^th^ Edition and the
California Standards Tests, Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), Academic
Performance Index (API), California English Language Development Test
(CELDT), and district and grade level assessments. Our district has
designed a system of assessing our students and reporting the data
results on a trimester basis. The results from district assessments are
entered into our Edusoft website. School, district and state assessment
data is then available in electronic format via the website. This gives
our teachers, principal, parents and district personnel ready access to
student assessment information. Teachers are able to run reports for
assessments as well as generate reports on previous years' STAR scores.
In addition, the website's bank of state standards-aligned questions
allows teachers to generate their own additional assessments based on
the needs of their students.

Ira Harbison's staff was trained in data evaluation and research
techniques by the RESULTS/California Reading Literature Project (CRLP).
Based on research from Marilyn Adams, Donald Bear and John Shefelbine,
this project included extensive training in standards-based assessment
research and data analysis. At the beginning of each school year,
teachers are provided results from the previous year's STAR data to
identify program strengths and gaps that need refinement. Teachers then
meet in grade level groups to plan the school year's curriculum and to
look at specific areas of concern. CELDT data is used to determine
instructional groupings and strategies for our English Language Learners
(ELL). Analyzing data and using that analysis to make instructional
decisions have been the key to understanding and improving our students'
and our school's performance.

**3. Communicating Assessment Results:** We are both proud of our
accomplishments and aware of our needs. We strive to share and discuss
this information with our community at many levels, so that we can work
together to achieve our goals.

The academic tone for the school year is established at our annual
Back-to-School Night when our principal reviews last year's
accomplishments with parents. Following that meeting, parents go to
their child's classroom where the teachers present grade level content
standards, curriculum, classroom procedures and share the expectations
and goals for the year. Our principal reports STAR data to the School
Site Council, English Learners Advisory Committee, teachers, staff and
community at meetings, Back-to-School Night and other public events on
and off campus. Three times a year at report card conferences, teachers
share their students' progress toward achieving grade level benchmarks
and meeting the California Content Standards. At the first conference,
teachers review the *Parent's Guide to the Standards-based Report Card*.
It is a 'parent friendly' explanation of the Content Standards and is
provided in English and Spanish. Teachers send home classroom reports
and newsletters communicating academic goals. Each spring our school
sends parents and community members a detailed School Accountability
Report Card (SARC) in English or Spanish. It informs the community about
our school's strengths and any areas needing improvement. Individual
student STAR assessment reports are mailed to parents each summer.
Additionally, STAR data is provided to the governing board and to the
public in local and regional print/newspapers and the internet.
Information on our district programs and our SARC are included on the
district website at [http://nsd.us](http://nsd.us/). Ira Harbison's
assessment results are a source of pride for students, parents, staff
members and our community.

**4. Sharing Success:** Ira Harbison School shares its successes with
other schools in a variety of ways. Teacher representatives from our
school serve on district committees including math, writing, language
arts, English Language Development, technology, etc. During committee
meetings, best practices are shared and a support network is
established. Our Language Arts Specialist and Resource Specialist meet
monthly with their colleagues from other schools and have the
opportunity to share our school's practices. At district administrative
meetings, time is always provided to share best practices.

Our accomplishments are shared on the internet allowing other schools to
view our successes and practices from any location. This information is
on EdSource: *Schools That are Beating the Odds*
(<http://www.edsource.org/sch_acc_bto.cfm>), and Just for the Kids
(<http://just4kids.org/>) which includes a digital copy of a case study
of Ira Harbison School as part of the California Best Practices Study.
This case study was conducted by the Bay Area School Reform
Collaborative (BASRC) in the summer of 2004. Members of our staff were
invited to present their best practices to teachers and administrators
from other California schools at two BASRC conferences.

We share more than our academic successes with other schools and our
community. Recent articles in local newspapers shared the success of our
walk-a-thon where we raised \$4,000 for the victims of Hurricane
Katrina. We were also acknowledged for receiving a technology grant that
awarded us 30 laptops from the Beaumont Foundation
(<http://www.bmtfoundation.com/bfa/us/public/>).

Our teachers are always willing to share their instructional practices
and to open their classrooms to practicing and pre-service educators. A
number of teachers on our staff are trained support providers for the
Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment (BTSA) program that is
administered by the California Department of Education. Sharing requires
us to reflect on our own practices while allowing other schools to
benefit from what we have learned. This is just part of our ongoing
commitment to ensure that our school slogan "Excellence for All!"
applies to more than just our own students.

###### PART V -- CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION

**1. Curriculum:** The curriculum at Harbison is research-based and
aligned to the rigorous California Content Standards. Instruction
insures that students receive a comprehensive and balanced educational
program that meets or exceeds the state and district standards in all
subjects.

**English Language Arts and English Language Development:** We use the
state approved and district adopted Houghton-Mifflin's, *A Legacy of
Literacy* (K-6) for literacy instruction and Rigby's, *On Our Way to
English* (K-5) and Hampton Brown's, *High Point* (6^th^) for English
language instruction. These programs provide each student with
research-based instruction focused on the California Content Standards.
Every student receives English Language Development instruction
targeting their specific needs based on their California English
Language Development Test (CELDT) scores.

The Houghton-Mifflin reading program addresses the foundational skills
of beginning learners in grades K-3 focusing instruction on concepts of
print, phonemic awareness, decoding, vocabulary, concept development and
comprehension. In grades 4-6, the focus is on reading to learn and
stresses comprehension skills, including analysis of grade-level
appropriate texts, expository critique, structural features of
literature, narrative analysis and literary criticism. To support the
writing component of HM, our district developed a writing guide that
provides a standards aligned framework for each grade level. This guide
includes instructional and support materials, prompts, graphic
organizers, six-trait rubrics and sample anchor papers.

*On Our Way To English* was selected by our district because it aligns
with the California English Language Development Standards. Its five
levels of instruction provide access points for English Language
Learners at all stages of language acquisition. These levels range from
'Beginning', focusing on listening and speaking, common social greetings
and answering questions with one or two word responses, to 'Advanced',
working on the more challenging skills of mastering idioms and using
correct language and grammar consistently in speech and written
language. The sixth grade adoption, *High Point,* stresses language
development and communication with an emphasis on cognitive academic
skills.

**Mathematics:** Math instruction is based on the state approved and
district adopted McGraw-Hill, *Mathematics*. Following research and
learning theory, it teaches basic mathematical skills first, then uses
them in problem solving and critical thinking activities. The core
skills taught focus on the California Mathematics Content Standards. The
five strands are: number sense; algebra and functions; measurement and
geometry; statistics, data analysis and probability; and mathematical
reasoning. Additional resources include manipulatives, Activities
Integrating Math & Science (AIMS) and the expertise of certified on-site
math specialists. We offer intervention classes before and after school
for students who are not meeting their grade level math standards.

**History/Social Science:** The goal of Ira Harbison's social science
curriculum is to develop responsible citizens through their
understanding of the global world they live in. Students learn to make
historical connections to the past, the present and the future.
Classroom instruction is based on Houghton Mifflin's *Social Studies*
(K-3) and McGraw Hill's, *Adventures in Time and Place* series in grades
4-6 and aligns with the California Standards for History/Social
Sciences.

**Science**: We use Harcourt Publishers, *Science* (K-5) and Holt,
Rinehart, Winston Publishers, *Holt Science and Technology Earth
Science.* (6^th^). These series were selected because they are aligned
to the California Science Content Standards for Science and address each
of the four identified strands: life sciences; earth sciences; physical
sciences; and, investigation and experimentation. "Hands-on" activities
from Full Option Science System (FOSS) and Harcourt science kits help
students gain a concrete understanding of science concepts. A
school-wide Ocean Month, using Lawrence Hall of Science's inquiry based
Marine Activities Resources and Education (MARE) curriculum has become
an annual feature of our science program.

**Arts:** Visual Arts are imbedded in the content curriculum at Ira
Harbison. An outstanding example of this is the MARE curriculum that
blends arts with science. Performing Arts are popular with our students.
Many participate in National School District's instrumental music and
dance programs, including band, orchestra, Mariachi, Ballet Folklorico,
and Filipino Pasacat Dance.

**2a.** **Reading:** Ira Harbison uses a focused, structured and
well-rounded reading curriculum. We use the standards-based
Houghton-Mifflin (HM) Reading program across all grade levels. It was
piloted and chosen district-wide by a committee of teachers and
administrators from all grade levels, including bilingual and special
education programs. The HM program was chosen for its solid,
standards-based core literature anthology and for providing multiple
resources for students. Our ELL population is a focus when choosing
materials for our reading curriculum. We supplement HM's *Handbook for
English Language Learners* with CRLP's *Focused Approach to Frontloading
English Language Instruction*.

Each instructional day includes 2 hours of language arts in the
intermediate grades and kindergarten, and 3 hours in the primary grades.
The reading program includes direct instruction, shared reading and
guided reading groups throughout all grade levels. Teachers assess
student needs to ensure universal access and to supplement the HM
materials with leveled readers that focus on phonics, comprehension
and/or fluency skills. Additionally, we use programs such as
Scholastic's *Systematic Instruction in Phoneme Awareness, Phonics and
Sight Words* (SIPPS) and HM's *Soar to Success* to target specific
student needs. Teachers use Accelerated Reader, a software program, to
monitor students' comprehension including HM and independent reading
selections. Pearson\'s *SuccessMaker Enterprise* is another electronic
component of our reading curriculum. Students interact daily with the
program practicing skills from basic phonics to critical thinking.
Detailed SuccessMaker reports allow teachers to target areas of concern.

Students who require additional support beyond the regular curriculum
receive a variety of reading interventions. The Language Arts
Specialist, Resource Specialist and two instructional assistants meet
with groups of students from all grade levels on a daily basis. Three
certificated part-time staff members offer specialized support for
students in all grade levels. Before and After School Programs provide a
variety of interventions for students.

**3. Mathematics:** Ira Harbison's math curriculum supports our vision
statement that our students will be "...self-directed learners and
become successful citizens who contribute positively in a global
society". We use the standards-based McGraw-Hill *Mathematics* as our
core curriculum. A minimum of one hour, direct instruction is
incorporated into each school day. This is supplemented with daily
independent practice on SuccessMaker software, reinforcing skills taught
in the classroom and providing teachers with current data to guide
instruction. Students also have access to
[www.eduplace.com](http://www.eduplace.com/), the McGraw-Hill website
aligned with our text and Math 24
([www.firstinmath.com](http://www.firstinmath.com/)).

Ira Harbison supplements the math curriculum with manipulatives
providing a "hands-on" and interactive curriculum. Geometric figures,
protractors, scales, clocks and calculators are just a few resources
found in our classrooms to enhance and support mathematical learning.

Five of our teachers received Math Specialist Certificates after
completing a series of courses through the University of California at
San Diego. Their expertise enriches our math program by providing staff
development and Family Math Nights. Each year, all teachers
district-wide receive three math professional development days. These
workshops, aligned with the math curriculum and the ELL standards,
provide our teachers with best practices, current methodologies and the
opportunity to collaborate with colleagues.

Math is more than computation. It is comprised of complex language. We
emphasize vocabulary and language skills to ensure that all students,
especially our ELLs, acquire math concepts and critical thinking skills.

We have several combination grade classes. Additional certificated
teachers provide math instruction to grade groups from these classes.
This ensures all students receive grade appropriate standards-based
instruction. As an additional support, we offer Before and After School
classes to students who are at risk. Every effort is made to meet the
needs of all students. Teachers provide additional instruction to small
groups and individuals, as necessary. We are proud of our math scores
yet we continuously refine our math program to ensure that our students
have the skills necessary to succeed in the real world.

**4. Instructional Methods:** Clear school goals, excellent pedagogical
practices, grade level standards, shared vision and ongoing assessments
are major forces that drive our instruction. Instructional methods
include a variety of strategies from direct instruction to
student-centered approaches such as cooperative learning groups,
problem-based learning and simulations. The consistent academic growth
shown by Ira Harbison students is due to highly qualified teachers using
best practices including hands-on activities for math and experiential
activities for science. *Guided Reading, Reading for Meaning, Strategies
that Work, Four Block Model, Reader\'s Workshop, Writing for Excellence,
Building a Writing Community, Writers Workshop* and *Nonfiction Writers
Craft* are some of our research-based resources.

We believe in success for all students. Differentiated instruction is
provided for our students including English Learners, At-Risk, GATE and
students on Individual Education Plans. Teachers, grade groups, district
committees and the School Site Council evaluate data to plan instruction
and monitor progress. Students performing below grade level receive
additional small group instruction from our Reading Specialist, Resource
Specialist and Before and After School programs.

It is important that students take responsibility for their own
learning. To assist them toward that goal, grade level standards are
posted in each classroom. Students peer edit and evaluate their own work
using rubrics, checklists and portfolios. They demonstrate their
learning through projects, oral presentations and computer-generated
reports from Accelerated Reader and SuccessMaker.

That same responsibility extends to homework. Teachers differentiate
standards-based homework by modifying assignments or carefully selecting
reading material to meet specific instructional needs. Daily reading
homework is standard practice. Parents reinforce the importance of
reading by checking their child\'s reading log.

Not all learning takes place in the classroom. Educational outings
extend learning opportunities. The Birch Aquarium, Friends of the Seals
and the Chula Vista Conservation Center assisted in our school wide
oceanography program, MARE. Local companies sponsor a successful Junior
Achievement Free Enterprise Day. Intermediate students attend outdoor
education programs at Camp Marston and Anza-Borrego Desert Environmental
Camp. Through a partnership with the Navy, fifth graders attend a
five-day science program, Starbase-Atlantis.

**\
**

**5. Professional Development:** Highly effective teachers are the key
to students' academic success. All staff, classified and certificated,
attend professional development to stay current in their jobs. We
continually review current research and student data in math, language
arts, and ELD to evaluate our professional needs and determine the most
appropriate staff development.

The district provides two days of staff development in selected
instructional areas. This year our curricular focus is English Language
Development. Three staff members received ELD leadership training and
provided professional development for our staff. Our district also
provides in-services for all teachers in writing, math, science,
technology, health and Second Step (a violence prevention program).

Our school demonstrates outstanding academic achievement due to our
collaboration and dedication to professional development. Teachers
select workshops to attend three times a year on non-school days. The
staff prioritizes needs and selects topics for these workshops. Topics
have included: *Non-fiction Writers Craft*, *Focused Approach for
English Language Development, Writing for Excellence, Strategies that
Work, Reading for Meaning* and *Differentiated Instruction*. Weekly
staff meetings and early dismissal Thursdays provide teachers
opportunities to work in grade groups and other collaborative teams.

Teachers participate in a variety of professional growth opportunities:
American History in the Schools (HITS) through the San Diego County
Office of Education; Math Specialists Program through UCSD; MARE
workshops from the Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California at
Berkeley; and geology, oceanography and physical science through UCSD.
Teachers organize professional book clubs and discussion groups focusing
on literacy and comprehension.

Our new teachers are supported through the Beginning Teachers Support
and Assessment (BTSA) program that includes a support provider. Monthly
academies and weekly communication through BTSA provide new teachers
with support to increase their understanding of the California Standards
for the Teaching Profession as well as the California Content Standards.

*No Child Left Behind* demands we have quality teachers. We support this
premise with extensive staff development opportunities for teachers.
Life-long learning is our goal for students and it is the commitment we
make to ourselves as professionals.

**PART VII - ASSESSMENT RESULTS\
**

####### Academic Performance Index (API) California's measure of school growth and performance

  -------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------
                       **2005**      **2004**      **2003**      **2002**

  **School-wide**      **775**       **756**       **749**       **705**

  **Subgroups**                                                  

  Socioeconomically\   **775**       **756**       **749**       **705**
  Disadvantaged                                                  

  Hispanic/Latino      **738**       **726**       **712**       **659**

  Filipino             **847**       **820**       **814**       **776**
  -------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------

####### Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Federal measure of school progress according to NCLB mandates

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
|         | *       |         | *       |         | *       |         |
|         | *2005** |         | *2004** |         | *2003** |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
|         | **Re    | *       | **Re    | *       | **Re    | *       |
|         | ading** | *Math** | ading** | *Math** | ading** | *Math** |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| **NCLB  | **24**  | **27**  | **14**  | **16**  | **14**  | **16**  |
| T       |         |         |         |         |         |         |
| arget** |         |         |         |         |         |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| ####### | **44**  | **58**  | **40**  | **53**  | **36**  | **51**  |
| # Ira H |         |         |         |         |         |         |
| arbison |         |         |         |         |         |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Language Arts **Grade:** Second Grade **Test:** California
Standards Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 70%    | 73%    | 71%    | 69%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 45%    | 36%    | 37%    | 29%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 14%    | 13%    | 9%     | 5%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 77     | 75     | 80     | 78     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 99%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 71%    | 73%    | 71%    | 69%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 46%    | 36%    | 37%    | 29%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 14%    | 13%    | 9%     | 5%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 76     | 75     | 80     | 78     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 55%    | 67%    | 66%    | 58%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 35%    | 29%    | 31%    | 23%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 10%    | 10%    | 4%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 40     | 48     | 51     | 41     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 92%    | 94%    | 80%    | 85%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 56%    | 63%    | 48%    | 41%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 12%    | 25%    | 16%    | 15%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 25     | 16     | 25     | 27     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 59%    | 70%    | 58%    | 77%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 44%    | 40%    | 29%    | 24%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 12%    | 16%    | 6%     | 3%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 41     | 37     | 31     | 38     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Language Arts **Grade:** Third Grade **Test:** California
Standards Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 72%    | 70%    | 70%    | 61%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 31%    | 21%    | 33%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 6%     | 3%     | 4%     | 3%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 80     | 80     | 79     | 79     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 99%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 72%    | 70%    | 70%    | 61%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 31%    | 21%    | 33%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 6%     | 3%     | 4%     | 3%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 80     | 80     | 79     | 79     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 69%    | 73%    | 64%    | 58%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 26%    | 16%    | 28%    | 11%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 2%     | 2%     | 2%     | 2%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 49     | 51     | 47     | 43     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 95%    | 71%    | 80%    | 78%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 39%    | 33%    | 40%    | 30%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 17%    | 4%     | 8%     | 4%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 18     | 24     | 25     | 27     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 76%    | 66%    | 72%    | 50%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 27%    | 16%    | 31%    | 11%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 5%     | 3%     | 2%     | 4%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 41     | 32     | 41     | 28     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Language Arts **Grade:** Fourth Grade **Test:** California
Standards Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 81%    | 76%    | 91%    | 70%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 51%    | 48%    | 46%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 26%    | 25%    | 15%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 97     | 101    | 101    | 76     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 99%    | 97%    | 100%   | 94%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 1%     | 1%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 81%    | 76%    | 90%    | 70%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 51%    | 48%    | 45%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 26%    | 25%    | 15%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 98     | 101    | 100    | 76     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 72%    | 70%    | 85%    | 64%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 48%    | 43%    | 36%    | 26%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 19%    | 16%    | 7%     | 13%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 59     | 56     | 55     | 40     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 100%   | 80%    | 97%    | 82%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 60%    | 54%    | 59%    | 68%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 37%    | 37%    | 25%    | 22%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 30     | 35     | 32     | 22     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 76%    | 75%    | 87%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 32%    | 39%    | 31%    | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 12%    | 13%    | 3%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 41     | 39     | 36     | 15     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Language Arts **Grade:** Fifth Grade **Test:** California
Standards Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 81%    | 77%    | 69%    | 72%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 44%    | 51%    | 31%    | 22%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 20%    | 22%    | 12%    | 4%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 90     | 104    | 81     | 98     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 95%    | 94%    | 100%   | 88%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 6      | 6      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 6%     | 6%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 81%    | 77%    | 69%    | 72%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 45%    | 51%    | 31%    | 22%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 20%    | 22%    | 12%    | 4%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 89     | 104    | 81     | 98     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 80%    | 68%    | 57%    | 65%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 38%    | 43%    | 25%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 13%    | 16%    | 11%    | 3%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 48     | 56     | 44     | 60     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 84%    | 92%    | 84%    | 88%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 57%    | 67%    | 36%    | 32%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 30%    | 31%    | 12%    | 4%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 30     | 36     | 25     | 25     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 86%    | 59%    | 42%    | 44%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 33%    | 30%    | 5%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 8%     | 6%     | 0%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 36     | 34     | 19     | 27     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Language Arts **Grade:** Sixth Grade **Test:** California
Standards Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 79%    | 72%    | 72%    | 68%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 46%    | 37%    | 33%    | 28%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 20%    | 18%    | 12%    | 6%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 102    | 84     | 99     | 103    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 94%    | 95%    | 100%   | 93%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 6      | 5      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 6%     | 5%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 79%    | 72%    | 72%    | 68%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 46%    | 37%    | 33%    | 28%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 19%    | 18%    | 12%    | 6%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 100    | 84     | 98     | 103    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 70%    | 67%    | 68%    | 58%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 39%    | 34%    | 27%    | 21%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 15%    | 16%    | 8%     | 6%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 59     | 45     | 59     | 52     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 97%    | 84%    | 84%    | 76%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 60%    | 36%    | 42%    | 31%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 23%    | 18%    | 25%    | 7%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 30     | 28     | 24     | 29     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 62%    | 58%    | 44%    | 29%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 24%    | 16%    | 0%     | 4%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 3%     | 5%     | 0%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 34     | 19     | 27     | 24     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Math **Grade:** Second Grade **Test:** California Standards
Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 80%    | 84%    | 80%    | 72%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 64%    | 64%    | 62%    | 43%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 33%    | 23%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 77     | 75     | 80     | 79     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 81%    | 84%    | 80%    | 72%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 65%    | 64%    | 62%    | 43%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 33%    | 23%    | 18%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 76     | 75     | 80     | 79     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 76%    | 83%    | 77%    | 70%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 53%    | 60%    | 57%    | 36%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 23%    | 27%    | 22%    | 7%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 40     | 48     | 51     | 41     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 88%    | 94%    | 88%    | 71%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 76%    | 81%    | 76%    | 52%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 32%    | 56%    | 24%    | 30%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 25     | 16     | 25     | 27     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 73%    | 87%    | 74%    | 71%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 56%    | 73%    | 61%    | 37%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 43%    | 16%    | 11%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 41     | 37     | 31     | 38     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Math **Grade:** Third Grade **Test:** California Standards
Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 92%    | 82%    | 80%    | 74%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 64%    | 53%    | 52%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 18%    | 28%    | 6%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 80     | 80     | 79     | 80     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 100%   | 100%   | 99%    | 100%   |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 92%    | 82%    | 80%    | 74%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 64%    | 53%    | 52%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 18%    | 28%    | 6%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 80     | 80     | 79     | 80     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 90%    | 78%    | 75%    | 68%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 57%    | 49%    | 49%    | 29%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 24%    | 14%    | 17%    | 2%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 49     | 51     | 47     | 44     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 100%   | 92%    | 88%    | 96%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 100%   | 71%    | 56%    | 66%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 50%    | 29%    | 44%    | 15%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 18     | 24     | 25     | 27     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 93%    | 75%    | 85%    | 75%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 71%    | 47%    | 56%    | 27%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 37%    | 16%    | 27%    | 3%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 41     | 32     | 41     | 29     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Math **Grade:** Fourth Grade **Test:** California Standards
Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 75%    | 80%    | 85%    | 68%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 55%    | 52%    | 58%    | 44%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 25%    | 26%    | 28%    | 16%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 97     | 101    | 101    | 76     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 99%    | 97%    | 100%   | 94%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 1%     | 1%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 75%    | 81%    | 85%    | 68%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 55%    | 51%    | 58%    | 44%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 25%    | 26%    | 28%    | 16%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 97     | 101    | 101    | 76     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 64%    | 73%    | 78%    | 51%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 44%    | 42%    | 47%    | 28%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 20%    | 18%    | 25%    | 10%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 59     | 55     | 55     | 40     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 94%    | 83%    | 98%    | 91%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 77%    | 63%    | 79%    | 64%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 30%    | 40%    | 41%    | 23%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 30     | 35     | 32     | 22     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 68%    | 80%    | 86%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 46%    | 44%    | 50%    | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 12%    | 23%    | 19%    | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 41     | 39     | 36     | 15     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Math **Grade:** Fifth Grade **Test:** California Standards
Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 74%    | 73%    | 60%    | 63%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 56%    | 60%    | 39%    | 34%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 22%    | 16%    | 8%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 90     | 104    | 81     | 98     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 95%    | 94%    | 100%   | 88%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 6      | 6      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 6%     | 6%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 74%    | 73%    | 60%    | 63%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 56%    | 60%    | 39%    | 34%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 29%    | 22%    | 16%    | 8%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 89     | 104    | 81     | 98     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 67%    | 65%    | 46%    | 52%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 48%    | 49%    | 32%    | 30%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 23%    | 13%    | 14%    | 7%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 48     | 56     | 44     | 60     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 84%    | 86%    | 76%    | 80%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 67%    | 78%    | 52%    | 44%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 40%    | 39%    | 20%    | 12%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 30     | 36     | 25     | 25     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 70%    | 56%    | 48%    | 33%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 53%    | 32%    | 11%    | 11%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 22%    | 6%     | 0%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 36     | 34     | 19     | 27     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} State Criterion-Referenced Tests**

**Subject:** Math **Grade:** Sixth Grade **Test:** California Standards
Test (CST)

+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
|                                  | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |
|                                  | 004-05 | 003-04 | 002-03 | 001-02 |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Testing Month                    | May    | May    | May    | May    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SCHOOL SCORES**                |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 76%    | 63%    | 59%    | 65%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 53%    | 39%    | 36%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 24%    | 18%    | 14%    | 13%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 102    | 84     | 99     | 104    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of total students tested | 94%    | 95%    | 100%   | 94%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students alternatively | 6      | 5      | 0      | 0      |
| assessed                         |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Percent of students              | 6%     | 5%     | 0%     | 0%     |
| alternatively assessed           |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**              |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 1\. Economically Disadvantaged   |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/ Far Below Basic &    | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 75%    | 63%    | 59%    | 65%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 53%    | 39%    | 36%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 23%    | 18%    | 14%    | 13%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 100    | 84     | 99     | 104    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 2\. Hispanic                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 65%    | 56%    | 53%    | 57%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 43%    | 29%    | 29%    | 36%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 14%    | 13%    | 12%    | 8%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 59     | 45     | 59     | 53     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 3\. Filipino                     |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 94%    | 71%    | 83%    | 76%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 67%    | 50%    | 54%    | 38%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 40%    | 21%    | 21%    | 21%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 30     | 28     | 24     | 29     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| 4.English Language Learners      |        |        |        |        |
| (ELL)                            |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Below/Far Below Basic &     | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   | 100%   |
| > Above                          |        |        |        |        |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Basic & Above               | 53%    | 42%    | 34%    | 40%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Proficient & Above          | 27%    | 16%    | 4%     | 16%    |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| > \% Advanced                    | 6%     | 0%     | 0%     | 0%     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
| Number of students tested        | 34     | 19     | 27     | 25     |
+----------------------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Reading

**Grade:** Second Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our school's scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring
at or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or
above grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SECOND GRADE**                     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 49%      | 40%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 75       | 80      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 100%     | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 0        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 0%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 49%      | 40%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 75       | 80      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 50%      | 35%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 48       | 51      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 56%      | 52%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 16       | 25      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 49%      | 32%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 37       | 31      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Reading

**Grade:** Third Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **THIRD GRADE**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | 39%     | 23%      | 37%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 80      | 80       | 79      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | 100%    | 100%     | 99%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | 0%      | 0%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 39%     | 23%      | 37%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 80      | 80       | 79      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 35%     | 18%      | 34%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 49      | 51       | 47      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 61%     | 38%      | 40%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 18      | 24       | 25      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 39%     | 16%      | 34%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 41      | 32       | 41      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Reading

**Grade:** Fourth Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **FOURTH GRADE**                     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 42%      | 47%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 101      | 101     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 97%      | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 1        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 1%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 42%      | 46%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 101      | 100     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 38%      | 36%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 55       | 55      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 46%      | 63%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 35       | 32      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 26%      | 31%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 39       | 36      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Reading

**Grade:** Fifth Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **FIFTH GRADE**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 53%      | 41%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 104      | 81      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 94%      | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 6        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 6%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 53%      | 41%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 104      | 81      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 45%      | 30%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 56       | 44      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 64%      | 52%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 36       | 25      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 32%      | 11%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 34       | 19      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Reading

**Grade:** Sixth Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SIXTH GRADE**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 49%      | 51%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 84       | 99      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 95%      | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 5        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 5%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 49%      | 51%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 84       | 98      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 40%      | 46%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 45       | 59      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 54%      | 63%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 28       | 24      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 21%      | 19%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 19       | 27      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Math

**Grade:** Second Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SECOND GRADE**                     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 75%      | 63%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 75       | 80      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 100%     | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 0        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 0%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 75%      | 63%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 75       | 80      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 71%      | 57%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 48       | 51      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 94%      | 76%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 16       | 25      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 73%      | 61%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 37       | 31      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Math

**Grade:** Third Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **THIRD GRADE**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | 61%     | 56%      | 57%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 80      | 80       | 79      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | 100%    | 100%     | 99%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | 0       | 0        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | 0%      | 0%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 61%     | 56%      | 57%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 80      | 80       | 79      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 55%     | 49%      | 51%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 49      | 51       | 47      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 94%     | 83%      | 68%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 18      | 24       | 25      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | 71%     | 47%      | 61%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | 41      | 32       | 41      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Math

**Grade:** Fourth Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **FOURTH GRADE**                     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 51%      | 59%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 101      | 101     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 97%      | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 1        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 1%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 51%      | 60%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 101      | 100     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 42%      | 51%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 55       | 55      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 57%      | 75%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 35       | 32      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 44%      | 56%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 39       | 36      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Math

**Grade:** Fifth Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05 | 2003-04  | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May     | May      | May     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **FIFTH GRADE**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*      | 62%      | 52%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 104      | 81      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*      | 94%      | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*      | 6        | 0       |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*      | 6%       | 0%      |
| Tested                               |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 62%      | 52%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 104      | 81      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 50%      | 36%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 56       | 44      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 78%      | 64%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 36       | 25      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |         |          |         |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*      | 44%      | 26%     |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*      | 34       | 19      |
+--------------------------------------+---------+----------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.

**[ASSESSMENT RESULTS:]{.underline} Assessments Referenced Against
National Norms**

**Subject:** Math

**Grade:** Sixth Grade

**Test:** California Achievement Test-6^th^ Edition (CAT6)

Our schools scores are reported as the percentage of students scoring at
or above the 50^th^ percentile ranking which is considered at or above
grade level.

+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| *Scores Reported as Percentiles*     |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| #                                    | 2004-05  | 2003-04 | 2002-03 |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Testing Month                        | May      | May     | May     |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| **SIXTH GRADE**                      |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| School-wide Scores (In Percentiles)  | \*       | 61%     | 54%     |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*       | 84      | 99      |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Percent of Total Students Tested     | \*       | 95%     | 100%    |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Number of Students Alternatively     | \*       | 5       | 0       |
| Tested                               |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Percent of Students Alternatively    | \*       | 5%      | 0%      |
| Tested                               |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| **SUBGROUP SCORES**                  |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| ##  1. Economically Disadvantaged    |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*       | 61%     | 54%     |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*       | 84      | 98      |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| **2. Hispanic**                      |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*       | 44%     | 43%     |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*       | 45      | 59      |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| **3. Filipino**                      |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*       | 79%     | 79%     |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*       | 28      | 24      |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| **4. English Language Learners**     |          |         |         |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Percentile                           | \*       | 37%     | 27%     |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+
| Number of Students Tested            | \*       | 19      | 27      |
+--------------------------------------+----------+---------+---------+

> \*The CAT6 has been administered for the past three years, though only
> to third grade\
> students in 2004-2005.