**FAAXX169: Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) \[See FAAXX702)**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All
  Capital Assets)**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **I.A. Overview**                   

                                      

  **1. Date of Submission:**          8/28/2006

  **2. Agency:**                      Department of Transportation

  **3. Bureau:**                      Federal Aviation Administration

  **4. Name of this Capital Asset:**  FAAXX169: Wide Area Augmentation
                                      System (WAAS) \[See FAAXX702)

  **5. Unique Project (Investment)    021-12-01-15-01-1010-00
  Identifier: (For IT investment      
  only, see section 53. For all       
  other, use agency ID system.)**     

  **6. What kind of investment will   Mixed Life Cycle
  this be in FY2008? (Please NOTE:    
  Investments moving to O&M ONLY in   
  FY2008, with Planning/Acquisition   
  activities prior to FY2008 should   
  not select O&M. These investments   
  should indicate their current       
  status.)**                          

  **7. What was the first budget year FY2004
  this investment was submitted to    
  OMB?**                              

  **8. Provide a brief summary and    
  justification for this investment,  
  including a brief description of    
  how this closes in part or in whole 
  an identified agency performance    
  gap:**                              

  WAAS is an extremely accurate       
  navigation system for aviation,     
  providing precise navigation and    
  landing guidance to equipped        
  aircraft in any weather. WAAS       
  provides coverage to the entire     
  U.S., overcoming obstacles to       
  ground-based systems, such as       
  mountainous terrain. WAAS results   
  in safety and capacity improvements 
  in the national airspace and will   
  reduce FAA operations costs by      
  enabling the removal of some of the 
  ground-based navigation             
  infrastructure. WAAS uses a network 
  of precisely located ground         
  reference stations across the U.S.  
  with locations in Canada and Mexico 
  to monitor GPS satellite signals.   
  This information is processed and   
  sent to user receivers via leased   
  navigation transponders on          
  geostationary satellites. The       
  WAAS-provided messages improve the  
  accuracy, availability, and safety  
  of GPS-derived position             
  information. WAAS addresses the     
  following performance gaps: - Lack  
  of precise navigation capabilities  
  that can handle continued air       
  traffic growth - Lack of stable     
  vertical guidance in all weather    
  conditions - Aging navigation       
  systems that are expensive to       
  maintain. WAAS became operational   
  July 10, 2003 and is in a mixed     
  life cycle. Development             
  Modernization and Enhancement       
  continues in conjunction with       
  operations and maintenance through  
  four remaining segments: 1) Full    
  LPV Performance 2004-2008 -         
  Evaluate and Control Phase 2) GLS   
  (Global Navigation Satellite System 
  (GNSS) Landing System) scheduled to 
  begin in 2009 and be completed in   
  2013 - Select Phase 3) Technical    
  refresh 2014-2028 - Select Phase 4) 
  Operations and Maintenance          
  2003-2028 - Evaluate Phase The Full 
  LPV performance segment will expand 
  service to almost 100% availability 
  to the continental U.S. and most of 
  Alaska. The GLS upgrade will        
  leverage the improvements the       
  Department of Defense will make as  
  part of its GPS modernization       
  program. As WAAS moves to the end   
  of its current phase, FAA plans to  
  update the WAAS Alternatives        
  Analysis in the next segment due to 
  known delays in GPS modernization.  
  GLS will provide better operational 
  capability during periods of severe 
  solar storm activity, additional    
  protection against interference to  
  the GPS, and enable FAA to          
  decommission numerous ground-based  
  navigation aids. Following GLS      
  development, O&M includes technical 
  refresh due to the COTS nature of   
  most of the system hardware. The    
  WAAS Summary of Spending increased  
  by \$33.5M due to surveys and       
  procedures that were not initially  
  planned in the May 2004 APB.        

  **9. Did the Agency\'s              Yes
  Executive/Investment Committee      
  approve this request?**             

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what was the    5/3/2004
  date of this approval?**            

  **10. Did the Project Manager       Yes
  review this Exhibit?**              

  **11. Contact information of        
  Project Manager?**                  

  **Name**                            

                                      

  **Phone Number**                    

  **Email**                           

  **12. Has the agency developed      No
  and/or promoted cost effective,     
  energy efficient and                
  environmentally sustainable         
  techniques or practices for this    
  project.**                          

  **   a. Will this investment        Yes
  include electronic assets           
  (including computers)?**            

  **   b. Is this investment for new  No
  construction or major retrofit of a 
  Federal building or facility?       
  (answer applicable to non-IT assets 
  only)**                             

  **      1. If \"yes,\" is an ESPC   
  or UESC being used to help fund     
  this investment?**                  

  **      2. If \"yes,\" will this    
  investment meet sustainable design  
  principles?**                       

  **      3. If \"yes,\" is it         
  designed to be 30% more energy      
  efficient than relevant code?**     

  **13. Does this investment support  No
  one of the PMA initiatives?**       

  **   If \"yes,\" check all that     
  apply:**                            

  **   13a. Briefly describe how this  
  asset directly supports the         
  identified initiative(s)?**         

  **14. Does this investment support  Yes
  a program assessed using the        
  Program Assessment Rating Tool      
  (PART)? (For more information about 
  the PART, visit                     
  www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)**     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does this       Yes
  investment address a weakness found 
  during the PART review?**           

  **   b. If \"yes,\" what is the     FAA Air Traffic Services
  name of the PART program assessed   
  by OMB\'s Program Assessment Rating 
  Tool?**                             

  **   c. If \"yes,\" what PART       Adequate
  rating did it receive?**            

  **15. Is this investment for        Yes
  information technology?**           

  **If the answer to Question: \"Is   
  this investment for information     
  technology?\" was \"Yes,\" complete 
  this sub-section. If the answer is  
  \"No,\" do not answer this          
  sub-section.**                      

  **For information technology        
  investments only:**                 

  **16. What is the level of the IT   Level 3
  Project? (per CIO Council PM        
  Guidance)**                         

  **17. What project management       \(1\) Project manager has been
  qualifications does the Project     validated as qualified for this
  Manager have? (per CIO Council PM   investment
  Guidance):**                        

  **18. Is this investment identified Yes
  as \"high risk\" on the Q4 - FY     
  2006 agency high risk report (per   
  OMB\'s \"high risk\" memo)?**       

  **19. Is this a financial           No
  management system?**                

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does this       
  investment address a FFMIA          
  compliance area?**                  

  **      1. If \"yes,\" which         
  compliance area:**                  

  **      2. If \"no,\" what does it   
  address?**                          

  **   b. If \"yes,\" please identify 
  the system name(s) and system       
  acronym(s) as reported in the most  
  recent financial systems inventory  
  update required by Circular A-11    
  section 52**                        

                                      

  **20. What is the percentage        
  breakout for the total FY2008       
  funding request for the following?  
  (This should total 100%)**          

  **Hardware**                        16.000000

  **Software**                        34.000000

  **Services**                        42.000000

  **Other**                           8.000000

  **21. If this project produces      N/A
  information dissemination products  
  for the public, are these products  
  published to the Internet in        
  conformance with OMB Memorandum     
  05-04 and included in your agency   
  inventory, schedules and            
  priorities?**                       

  **22. Contact information of        
  individual responsible for privacy  
  related questions:**                

  **Name**                            

                                      

  **Phone Number**                    

  **Title**                           

  **E-mail**                          

  **23. Are the records produced by   Yes
  this investment appropriately       
  scheduled with the National         
  Archives and Records                
  Administration\'s approval?**       
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.B. Summary of Funding**                                           

                                                                        

  **Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by  
  completing the following table. All amounts represent budget          
  authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places.       
  Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated 
  \"Government FTE Cost,\" and should be excluded from the amounts      
  shown for \"Planning,\" \"Full Acquisition,\" and                     
  \"Operation/Maintenance.\" The total estimated annual cost of the     
  investment is the sum of costs for \"Planning,\" \"Full               
  Acquisition,\" and \"Operation/Maintenance.\" For Federal buildings   
  and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy,     
  environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs   
  associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be     
  included in this report.**                                            

  **Table 1: SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT PHASES\                    
  (REPORTED IN MILLIONS)\                                               
  (Estimates for BY+1 and beyond are for planning purposes only and do  
  not represent budget decisions)**                                     
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- -----------
                   **PY - 1\   **PY     **CY     **BY     **BY + 1 **BY + 2 **BY + 3 **BY + 4\  **Total**
                   and\        2006**   2007**   2008**   2009**   2010**   2011**   and\       
                   Earlier**                                                         Beyond**   

  Planning                                                                                      

      Budgetary    11.31       2.53     2.87     2.99     0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Acquisition                                                                                   

      Budgetary    1022.71     89.54    119.53   112.91   0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Subtotal                                                                                      
  Planning &                                                                                    
  Acquisition                                                                                   

      Budgetary    1034.02     92.07    122.4    115.9    0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Operations &                                                                                  
  Maintenance                                                                                   

      Budgetary    50.28       24.38    24.18    28.82    0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  TOTAL                                                                                         

      Budgetary    1084.3      116.45   146.58   144.72   0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Government FTE                                                                                
  Costs                                                                                         

    Budgetary      47.744      5.365    5.52     6.04     0        0        0        0          0
  Resources                                                                                     

  Number of FTE    357.45      41.27    42.46    46.46    0        0        0        0          0
  represented by                                                                                
  Costs:                                                                                        
  ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- -----------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **Note: For the cross-agency        
  investments, this table should      
  include all funding (both managing  
  partner and partner agencies).      
  Government FTE Costs should not be  
  included as part of the TOTAL       
  represented.**                      

                                      

  **2. Will this project require the  Yes
  agency to hire additional FTE\'s?** 

  **   a. If \"yes,\" How many and in The WAAS Program will need 4
  what year?**                        additional FTEs in FY08 and 4
                                      additional in FY09.

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **I.C. Acquisition/Contract         
  Strategy**                          

                                      

  **2. If earned value is not         
  required or will not be a contract  
  requirement for any of the          
  contracts or task orders above,     
  explain why:**                      

  DTFA01-97-C-00008 (LM) - This       
  contract doesn\'t require EVM for   
  leased satellite services paid with 
  F&E money. DTFAWA-06-C-00006        
  (AMTI) - EVM was not a requirement  
  at the time of award.               
  DTFA01-01-X-02070 (NASA) - This     
  contract is an Interagency          
  Agreement. WAT01G018 (Boston        
  College) - This contract is a       
  Grant. WAT95G005 (Stanford) - This  
  contract is a Cooperative           
  Agreement. DTFAWA-03-C-00079        
  (Zeta) - EVM was not a requirement  
  at the time of award. WA04VOLPE44B  
  (VOLPE) - This contract is a        
  Government Work Agreement. The WAAS 
  Program is not exposed to any       
  additional risk because these       
  contract vehicles provide program   
  support, technical analysis, and/or 
  lease services. The WAAS Program    
  conducts periodic reviews to        
  monitor cost, schedule,             
  performance, and technical status   
  for these contracts. All of the     
  WAAS prime development contracts    
  are managed according to the        
  ANSI/EIA Standard-748 guidelines.   
  The WAAS Program is implementing    
  EVM at the program level according  
  to our Plan of Actions and          
  Milestones (POA&M). The WAAS        
  program has created a WAAS master   
  program schedule, restructured      
  contractor WBSs, established        
  control account managers (CAMs),    
  control accounts, and modified      
  labor distribution reporting (LDR)  
  codes to track FTEs consistent with 
  the FAA WBS. WAAS will be fully     
  compliant at the program level with 
  EVM by December 2007.               

  **3. Do the contracts ensure        Yes
  Section 508 compliance?**           

  **   a. Explain why:**              Section 508 is included in all
                                      statements of work and enforced by
                                      all team leads. In accordance with
                                      FAA\'s Section 508 Procurement
                                      Operating Procedures, WAAS has
                                      determined that the following
                                      Section 508 standards apply and are
                                      in compliance with each applicable
                                      standard; 1194.21, 1194.22,
                                      1194.23, 1194.25, 1194.26, 1194.31,
                                      1194.41

  **4. Is there an acquisition plan   Yes
  which has been approved in          
  accordance with agency              
  requirements?**                     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     5/3/2004
  date?**                             

  **   b. If \"no,\" will an           
  acquisition plan be developed?**    

  **      1. If \"no,\" briefly        
  explain why:**                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.D. Performance Information**                                      

                                                                        

  **In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300,      
  performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to    
  the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the          
  agency\'s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures must  
  be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency\'s      
  strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill.   
  They are the internal and external performance benefits this          
  investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve        
  efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300       
  percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 
  percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable       
  investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do   
  not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or         
  investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved  
  that do not have a quantitative or qualitative measure.**             

  **Agencies must use Table 1 below for reporting performance goals and 
  measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments   
  that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table can be extended to    
  include measures for years beyond FY 2006.**                          

                                                                        

  **Performance Information Table 1:**                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- ------------------ ---------------- ------------------- ---------------- ---------------
  **Fiscal   **Strategic        **Performance    **Actual/baseline   **Planned        **Performance
  Year**     Goal(s)            Measure**        (from Previous      Performance      Metric Results
             Supported**                         Year)**             Metric           (Actual)**
                                                                     (Target)**       

  2004       DOT Safety: Reduce Provide WAAS     Provided navigation Install wide     Completed site
             commercial         guidance         guidance and 90%    area reference   surveys at all
             aviation fatal     throughout the   availability of LPV stations (WRSs)  Alaskan sites
             accidents to 0.01  United States    service over 95% of in Alaska to     as of July 1,
             per 100 thousand   including 95%    the continental     increase         2004.
             departures; and    precision        United States.      coverage in      Anticipate
             general aviation   approach                             Alaska. WRSs     installation of
             to 325. FAA        capability (LPV                      will be          sites by end of
             Safety: Reduce     and/or GLS) over                     operational and  FY 2004 to
             accident rate in   the continental                      provide          facilitate 2006
             Alaska. Strategy:  United States.                       additional       operational
             Achieve full                                            coverage in      date.
             operational                                             2006.            
             capability of WAAS                                                       
             in CONUS and AK.                                                         

  2004       DOT Mobility:      Provide WAAS     At the end of 2003, Publish 50 new   Completed.
             Increase on time   approach         there were 7 WAAS   LPV approach     There were 57
             arrivals to 83.64  procedures to    approach            procedures.      published LPV
             percent. FAA       4500 runway ends procedures.                          approach
             Greater Capacity:  by 2020.                                              procedures.
             Increase airport                                                         
             capacity in the                                                          
             United States to                                                         
             meet projected                                                           
             demand. Strategy:                                                        
             Develop and                                                              
             implement RNP/WAAS                                                       
             procedures at the                                                        
             35 OEP airports.                                                         

  2004       DOT Global         Create bilateral 21 International    Create bilateral Completed
             Connectivity:      international    Bilateral           international    international
             Harmonize          agreements with  Agreements.         agreements with  agreements with
             performance        ICAO member                          two additional   Canada and
             measures. FAA      nations on the                       nations on the   Mexico in June
             International      use of GPS and                       use of GPS and   2004. These
             Leadership:        its                                  its              agreements
             Increase the       augmentations.                       augmentations.   delineated work
             safety and                                                               required to
             capacity of global                                                       complete an
             civil aerospace.                                                         integrated
             Strategy: Promote                                                        North American
             interoperability                                                         GPS satellite
             and global                                                               based
             acceptance of the                                                        augmentation
             GNSS and                                                                 system.
             augmentation                                                             
             systems.                                                                 
  ---------- ------------------ ---------------- ------------------- ---------------- ---------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
                                                                        

  **All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must use    
  Table 2 and are required to use the Federal Enterprise Architecture   
  (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please use Table 2 and the   
  PRM to identify the performance information pertaining to this major  
  IT investment. Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding    
  \"Measurement Area\" and \"Measurement Grouping\" identified in the   
  PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for at least  
  four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is   
  available at www.egov.gov.**                                          

  **Performance Information Table 2:**                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------- -------------------- ---------------
  **Fiscal   **Measurement   **Measurement    **Measurement    **Measurement    **Baseline**   **Planned            **Actual
  Year**     Area**          Category**       Grouping**       Indicator**                     Improvement to the   Results**
                                                                                               Baseline**           

  2005       Customer        Service          Availability     Provide          LPV service    Install 4 wide area  Complete. 4 new
             Results         Accessibility                     additional       over 95% of    reference stations   reference
                                                               availability to  the            (WRSs) in Alaska to  stations were
                                                               customers by     continental    provide additional   installed in
                                                               increasing the   United States  coverage in Alaska.  Alaska in
                                                               WAAS LPV signal                 Scheduled to be      February 2005.
                                                               availability                    operational in 2006  

  2005       Customer        Service Coverage New Customers    Promote          There are 23   Add 1 additional     Complete. The
             Results                          and Market       cooperation      bilateral      country cooperating  U.S. signed an
                                              Penetration      through the      agreements     with the United      agreement with
                                                               creation of      today on use   States on the use of the European
                                                               bilateral        of GPS and its GNSS. This           Union (E.U.) to
                                                               international    augmentation   improvement goal     cooperate on
                                                               agreements with                 supports the DOT     the use of GPS
                                                               other nations on                goal of global       and Galileo the
                                                               the use of GPS                  connectivity and the core components
                                                               and its                         FAA goal of          of GNSS. The
                                                               augmentations.                  international        E.U. is
                                                               This will                       leadership.          currently
                                                               encourage the                                        comprised of 25
                                                               use of GNSS and                                      member states.
                                                               provide                                              
                                                               opportunities                                        
                                                               for American air                                     
                                                               carriers and                                         
                                                               industry                                             

  2005       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Increase safety  There are 7500 Add 100 LPV approach Complete. In
             Business                         Transportation   and capacity of  runway ends    procedures to        2005, 101 new
             Results                                           the airspace by  without        runways without an   LPV procedures
                                                               providing new    vertical       ILS. This            were published
                                                               vertically       guidance       improvement supports to runway ends
                                                               guided                          the DOT and FAA      without ILS.
                                                               approaches                      goals of increased   
                                                                                               safety, capacity,    
                                                                                               and mobility         

  2005       Processes and   Financial        Savings and Cost Cost avoidance   There are 7500 Add 300 LPV approach Complete. In
             Activities      (Processes and   Avoidance        by providing     runway ends    procedures to        2005, 101 new
                             Activities)                       WAAS service at  without        runways without an   LPV procedures
                                                               runway ends      vertical       ILS. This            were published
                                                               currently not    guidance       improvement supports to runway ends
                                                               served by ILS.                  the DOT and FAA      without ILS.
                                                               The cost savings                goals of increased   
                                                               of implementing                 safety, capacity,    
                                                               an LPV approach                 and mobility         
                                                               instead of an                                        
                                                               ILS is                                               
                                                               approximately                                        
                                                               \$1 million per                                      
                                                               runway end.                                          

  2005       Technology      Effectiveness    User             Demonstrate user There are      500 aircraft         Complete. At
                                              Satisfaction     satisfaction     205,000        equipped with WAAS   the end of
                                                               through sales of aircraft       receivers            FY05, Garmin
                                                               WAAS-enabled     without WAAS                        International
                                                               receivers        receivers                           (Avionics
                                                                                                                    Manufacturer)
                                                                                                                    reported over
                                                                                                                    1,000 WAAS
                                                                                                                    receivers have
                                                                                                                    been sold.

  2006       Customer        Service          Availability     Provide          LPV service    Install 3 additional Completed in
             Results         Accessibility                     additional       over 95% of    wide area reference  July 2006.
                                                               availability to  the            stations (WRSs) in   Reference
                                                               customers by     continental    Canada and 2 WRSs in stations were
                                                               increasing the   United States  Mexico to increase   installed in
                                                               WAAS LPV signal                 coverage in          Canada (Goose
                                                               availability                    northeast United     Bay, Winnipeg,
                                                                                               States, southern     and Iqaluit)
                                                                                               Texas, and southern  and Mexico
                                                                                               California.          (Merida and
                                                                                               Scheduled to be      Puerto
                                                                                               operational in 2007  Vallarta)

  2006       Customer        Service Coverage New Customers    Promote          There are 24   Add 1 additional     Complete.
             Results                          and Market       cooperation      bilateral      country cooperating  Working with
                                              Penetration      through the      agreements     with the United      India to
                                                               creation of      today on use   States on the use of cooperate on
                                                               bilateral        of GPS and its GNSS. This           the
                                                               international    augmentation   improvement goal     certification
                                                               agreements with                 supports the DOT     of the Indian
                                                               other nations on                goal of global       SBAS system,
                                                               the use of GPS                  connectivity and the GAGAN.
                                                               and its                         FAA goal of          
                                                               augmentations.                  international        
                                                               This will                       leadership.          
                                                               encourage the                                        
                                                               use of GNSS and                                      
                                                               provide                                              
                                                               opportunities                                        
                                                               for American air                                     
                                                               carriers and                                         
                                                               industry                                             

  2006       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Increase safety  There will be  Add 300 LPV approach 9/06. FAA will
             Business                         Transportation   and capacity of  7400 runway    procedures to        publish over
             Results                                           the airspace by  ends without   runways without an   300 LPVs in
                                                               providing new    vertical       ILS. This            2006. FAA will
                                                               vertically       guidance       improvement supports not be able to
                                                               guided                          the DOT and FAA      meet the goal
                                                               approaches                      goals of increased   to publish 300
                                                                                               safety and           LPV procedures
                                                                                               mobility/capacity.   at non-ILS
                                                                                                                    runway ends due
                                                                                                                    to lack of
                                                                                                                    survey data.
                                                                                                                    Production of
                                                                                                                    survey data has
                                                                                                                    been increased
                                                                                                                    to meet 2007
                                                                                                                    goal.

  2006       Processes and   Financial        Savings and Cost Cost avoidance   There are 7400 Add 300 LPV approach 9/06. FAA will
             Activities      (Processes and   Avoidance        by providing     runway ends    procedures to        publish over
                             Activities)                       WAAS service at  without        runways without an   300 LPVs in
                                                               runway ends      vertical       ILS. This            2006. FAA will
                                                               currently not    guidance       improvement supports not be able to
                                                               served by ILS.                  the DOT and FAA      meet the goal
                                                               The cost savings                goals of increased   to publish 300
                                                               of implementing                 safety, capacity,    LPV procedures
                                                               an LPV approach                 and mobility         at non-ILS
                                                               instead of an                                        runway ends due
                                                               ILS is                                               to lack of
                                                               approximately                                        survey data.
                                                               \$1 million per                                      Production of
                                                               runway end.                                          survey data has
                                                                                                                    been increased
                                                                                                                    to meet 2007
                                                                                                                    goal.

  2006       Technology      Effectiveness    User             Demonstrate user There are      500 aircraft         Complete. At
                                              Satisfaction     satisfaction     204,000        equipped with WAAS   the end of
                                                               through sales of aircraft       receivers            FY06, Garmin
                                                               WAAS-enabled     without WAAS                        International
                                                               receivers        receivers                           (Avionics
                                                                                                                    Manufacturer)
                                                                                                                    reported over
                                                                                                                    3,100 WAAS
                                                                                                                    receivers have
                                                                                                                    been sold.

  2007       Customer        Service          Availability     Provide          LPV service    Certify 2 additional Planned to be
             Results         Accessibility                     additional       over 95% of    wide area reference  complete by
                                                               availability to  the            stations (WRSs) in   9/07.
                                                               customers by     continental    Canada and 2 WRSs in 
                                                               increasing the   United States  Mexico for           
                                                               WAAS LPV signal                 operational use to   
                                                               availability                    increase coverage in 
                                                                                               northeast United     
                                                                                               States, southern     
                                                                                               Texas, and southern  
                                                                                               California.          
                                                                                               Scheduled to be      
                                                                                               operational in 2007  

  2007       Customer        Service Coverage New Customers    Promote          There are 25   Add 1 additional     Planned to be
             Results                          and Market       cooperation      bilateral      country cooperating  complete by
                                              Penetration      through the      agreements     with the United      9/07.
                                                               creation of      today on use   States on the use of 
                                                               bilateral        of GPS and its GNSS. This           
                                                               international    augmentation   improvement goal     
                                                               agreements with                 supports the DOT     
                                                               other nations on                goal of global       
                                                               the use of GPS                  connectivity and the 
                                                               and its                         FAA goal of          
                                                               augmentations.                  international        
                                                               This will                       leadership.          
                                                               encourage the                                        
                                                               use of GNSS and                                      
                                                               provide                                              
                                                               opportunities                                        
                                                               for American air                                     
                                                               carriers and                                         
                                                               industry                                             

  2007       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Increase safety  There will be  Add 300 LPV approach Planned to be
             Business                         Transportation   and capacity of  7100 runway    procedures to        complete by
             Results                                           the airspace by  ends without   runways. This        9/07.
                                                               providing new    vertical       improvement supports 
                                                               vertically       guidance       the DOT and FAA      
                                                               guided                          goals of increased   
                                                               approaches                      safety, capacity,    
                                                                                               and mobility         

  2007       Processes and   Financial        Savings and Cost Cost avoidance   7100 runway    Add 300 LPV approach Planned to be
             Activities      (Processes and   Avoidance        by providing     ends without   procedures to        complete by
                             Activities)                       WAAS service at  vertical       runways. This        9/07.
                                                               runway ends      guidance       improvement supports 
                                                               currently not                   the DOT and FAA      
                                                               served by ILS.                  goals of increased   
                                                               The cost savings                safety, capacity,    
                                                               of implementing                 and mobility         
                                                               an LPV approach                                      
                                                               instead of an                                        
                                                               ILS is                                               
                                                               approximately                                        
                                                               \$1 million per                                      
                                                               runway end.                                          

  2007       Technology      Effectiveness    User             Demonstrate user There are      500 aircraft         Planned to be
                                              Satisfaction     satisfaction     203,500        equipped with WAAS   complete by
                                                               through sales of aircraft       receivers            9/07.
                                                               WAAS-enabled     without WAAS                        
                                                               receivers        receivers                           

  2008       Customer        Service          Availability     Provide          LPV service    Complete development  Planned to be
             Results         Accessibility                     additional       over 95% of    and testing of Full  complete by
                                                               availability to  the            LPV Capability WAAS  9/08.
                                                               customers by     continental    to provide LPV       
                                                               increasing the   United States  service over 95% of  
                                                               WAAS LPV signal                 the United States.   
                                                               availability                                         

  2008       Customer        Service Coverage New Customers    Promote          There are 26   Add 1 additional     Planned to be
             Results                          and Market       cooperation      bilateral      country cooperating  complete by
                                              Penetration      through the      agreements     with the United      9/08.
                                                               creation of      today on use   States on the use of 
                                                               bilateral        of GPS and its GNSS. This           
                                                               international    augmentation   improvement goal     
                                                               agreements with                 supports the DOT     
                                                               other nations on                goal of global       
                                                               the use of GPS                  connectivity and the 
                                                               and its                         FAA goal of          
                                                               augmentations.                  international        
                                                               This will                       leadership.          
                                                               encourage the                                        
                                                               use of GNSS and                                      
                                                               provide                                              
                                                               opportunities                                        
                                                               for American air                                     
                                                               carriers and                                         
                                                               industry                                             

  2008       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Increase safety  There will be  Add 300 LPV approach Planned to be
             Business                         Transportation   and capacity of  6800 runway    procedures to        complete by
             Results                                           the airspace by  ends without   runways. This        9/08.
                                                               providing new    vertical       improvement supports 
                                                               vertically       guidance       the DOT and FAA      
                                                               guided                          goals of increased   
                                                               approaches                      safety and           
                                                                                               mobility/capacity.   

  2008       Processes and   Financial        Savings and Cost Cost avoidance   6800 runway    Add 300 LPV approach Planned to be
             Activities      (Processes and   Avoidance        by providing     ends lack      procedures to        complete by
                             Activities)                       WAAS service at  either an LPV  runways. This        9/08.
                                                               runway ends      or an ILS      improvement supports 
                                                               currently not    approach       the DOT and FAA      
                                                               served by ILS.                  goals of increased   
                                                               The cost savings                safety, capacity,    
                                                               of implementing                 and mobility         
                                                               an LPV approach                                      
                                                               instead of an                                        
                                                               ILS is                                               
                                                               approximately                                        
                                                               \$1 million per                                      
                                                               runway end.                                          

  2008       Technology      Effectiveness    User             Demonstrate user There are      500 aircraft         Planned to be
                                              Satisfaction     satisfaction     203,000        equipped with WAAS   complete by
                                                               through sales of aircraft       receivers            9/08.
                                                               WAAS-enabled     without WAAS                        
                                                               receivers        receivers                           

  2009       Customer        Service          Availability     Provide          LPV service    Complete development Planned to be
             Results         Accessibility                     additional       over 95% of    and testing of Full  complete by
                                                               availability to  the            LPV Capability WAAS  12/08.
                                                               customers by     continental    to provide LPV       
                                                               increasing the   United States  service over 95% of  
                                                               WAAS LPV signal                 the United States    
                                                               availability                    and 2/3 of Alaska.   

  2009       Customer        Service Coverage New Customers    Promote          There are 26   Add 1 additional     Planned to be
             Results                          and Market       cooperation      bilateral      country cooperating  complete by
                                              Penetration      through the      agreements     with the United      09/09.
                                                               creation of      today on use   States on the use of 
                                                               bilateral        of GPS and its GNSS. This           
                                                               international    augmentation   improvement goal     
                                                               agreements with                 supports the DOT     
                                                               other nations on                goal of global       
                                                               the use of GPS                  connectivity and the 
                                                               and its                         FAA goal of          
                                                               augmentations.                  international        
                                                               This will                       leadership.          
                                                               encourage the                                        
                                                               use of GNSS and                                      
                                                               provide                                              
                                                               opportunities                                        
                                                               for American air                                     
                                                               carriers and                                         
                                                               industry                                             

  2009       Mission and     Transportation   Air              Increase safety  There are 6800 Add 300 LPV approach Planned to be
             Business                         Transportation   and capacity of  runway ends    procedures to        complete by
             Results                                           the airspace by  without        runways. This        09/09.
                                                               providing new    vertical       improvement supports 
                                                               vertically       guidance       the DOT and FAA      
                                                               guided                          goals of increased   
                                                               approaches                      safety, capacity,    
                                                                                               and mobility         

  2009       Processes and   Financial        Savings and Cost Cost avoidance   There are 6800 Add 300 LPV approach Planned to be
             Activities      (Processes and   Avoidance        by providing     runway ends    procedures to        complete by
                             Activities)                       WAAS service at  without        runways. This        09/09.
                                                               runway ends      vertical       improvement supports 
                                                               currently not    guidance       the DOT and FAA      
                                                               served by ILS.                  goals of increased   
                                                               The cost savings                safety, capacity,    
                                                               of implementing                 and mobility         
                                                               an LPV approach                                      
                                                               instead of an                                        
                                                               ILS is                                               
                                                               approximately                                        
                                                               \$1 million per                                      
                                                               runway end.                                          

  2009       Technology      Effectiveness    User             Demonstrate user There are      500 aircraft         Planned to be
                                              Satisfaction     satisfaction     203,000        equipped with WAAS   complete by
                                                               through sales of aircraft       receivers            09/09.
                                                               WAAS-enabled     without WAAS                        
                                                               receivers        receivers                           
  ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------- -------------------- ---------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
  **I.E. Security and Privacy**                                   

                                                                  

  **In order to successfully address this area of the business    
  case, each question below must be answered at the               
  system/application level, not at a program or agency level.     
  Systems supporting this investment on the planning and          
  operational systems security tables should match the systems on 
  the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security    
  Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory    
  and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should  
  use the same name or identifier).**                             

  **All systems supporting and/or part of this investment should  
  be included in the tables below, inclusive of both agency owned 
  systems and contractor systems. For IT investments under        
  development, security and privacy planning must proceed in      
  parallel with the development of the system/s to ensure IT      
  security and privacy requirements and costs are identified and  
  incorporated into the overall lifecycle of the system/s.**      

  **Please respond to the questions below and verify the system   
  owner took the following actions:**                             

  **1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been          Yes
  identified and integrated into the overall costs of the         
  investment:**                                                   

  **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the \"Percentage IT Security\" for  1.710000
  the budget year:**                                              

  **2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a  Yes
  part of the overall risk management effort for each system      
  supporting or part of this investment.**                        

                                                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

  -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
  **5. Have any weaknesses, not yet remediated, related to any of the  No
  systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by the 
  agency or IG?**                                                      

  **   a. If \"yes,\" have those weaknesses been incorporated          
  agency\'s plan of action and milestone process?**                    

  **6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is          No
  requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?**                     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" specify the amount, provide a general            
  description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request     
  will remediate the weakness.**                                       

                                                                       

  **8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:**               
  -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----

  -------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------ ----------- -----------
  **Name of      **Is this a **Is there a     **Is the PIA **Is a      **Was a new
  System**       new         Privacy Impact   available to System of   or amended
                 system?**   Assessment (PIA) the          Records     SORN
                             that covers this public?**    Notice      published
                             system?**                     (SORN)      in FY 06?**
                                                           required    
                                                           for this    
                                                           system?**   

  Wide Area      No          No, because the  No, because  No          No, because
  Augmentation               system does not  a PIA is not             the system
  System                     contain,         yet required             is not a
                             process, or      to be                    Privacy Act
                             transmit         completed at             system of
                             personal         this time.               records.
                             identifying                               
                             information.                              
  -------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------ ----------- -----------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **I.F. Enterprise Architecture (EA)**            |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **In order to successfully address this area of  |                   |
| the business case and capital asset plan you     |                   |
| must ensure the investment is included in the    |                   |
| agency\'s EA and Capital Planning and Investment |                   |
| Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and     |                   |
| supports the FEA. You must also ensure the       |                   |
| business case demonstrates the relationship      |                   |
| between the investment and the business,         |                   |
| performance, data, services, application, and    |                   |
| technology layers of the agency\'s EA.**         |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **1. Is this investment included in your         | Yes               |
| agency\'s target enterprise architecture?**      |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **   a. If \"no,\" please explain why?**         |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **2. Is this investment included in the          | No                |
| agency\'s EA Transition Strategy?**              |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the investment name  |                   |
| as identified in the Transition Strategy         |                   |
| provided in the agency\'s most recent annual EA  |                   |
| Assessment.**                                    |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **   b. If \"no,\" please explain why?**         |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| To effectively balance the development and       |                   |
| management of the DOT Transition Strategy, the   |                   |
| first version was scoped to include those        |                   |
| investments with development activities (non     |                   |
| O&M). Additionally, as the NAS Architecture was  |                   |
| publicly available, it was also not fully        |                   |
| integrated with the materials forwarded to OMB   |                   |
| in February 2006. However, the NAS is considered |                   |
| part of the DOT Transition Strategy and will be  |                   |
| more fully integrated within the next revision.  |                   |
| Future revisions are set to expand upon that     |                   |
| scope and include both steady state (O&M)        |                   |
| investments and expanded linkages to the NAS     |                   |
| Architecture. Since this FAA investment does not |                   |
| appear to be specifically mentioned within the   |                   |
| DOT Transition Strategy or the FAA Modernization |                   |
| Blueprint, please refer to the following public  |                   |
| NAS websites which document the plan for the     |                   |
| FAA\'s target architecture where the investment  |                   |
| can be found as well as a sequencing plan        |                   |
| showing the dependencies. FAA NAS Architecture   |                   |
| Website www.nas-architecture.faa.gov NAS         |                   |
| Operational Improvement Report                   |                   |
| http://www.nas-architectur                       |                   |
| e.faa.gov/nas5/downloads/full_oi_long_report.pdf |                   |
| NAS Executive Views (Roadmaps/Sequencing)        |                   |
| http://www.                                      |                   |
| nas-architecture.faa.gov/nas5/view_exec/home.cfm |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| **3. Service Reference Model (SRM) Table:**      |                   |
|                                                  |                   |
| **Identify the service components funded by this |                   |
| major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, |                   |
| content management, customer relationship        |                   |
| management, etc.). Provide this information in   |                   |
| the format of the following table. For detailed  |                   |
| guidance regarding components, please refer to   |                   |
| http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.**           |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+

  ----------- ---------------- ------------ --------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
  **Agency    **Agency         **Service    **FEA SRM       **FEA SRM     **FEA       **FEA       **Internal   **BY Funding
  Component   Component        Domain**     Service Type**  Component**   Service     Service     or External  Percentage**
  Name**      Description**                                               Component   Component   Reuse?**     
                                                                          Reused      Reused                   
                                                                          Name**      UPI**                    

  Airborne    NAS provides     Business     Visualization   Mapping /                             No Reuse     89
  Guidance    signals in       Analytical                   Geospatial /                                       
              space, through   Services                     Elevation /                                        
              space-based                                   GPS                                                
              mechanisms and                                                                                   
              ground-based                                                                                     
              aids, for                                                                                        
              point-in-space                                                                                   
              navigation                                                                                       
              through a                                                                                        
              variety of                                                                                       
              operating                                                                                        
              environments.                                                                                    
              These                                                                                            
              environments                                                                                     
              include                                                                                          
              structured                                                                                       
              routes, random                                                                                   
              routings, and                                                                                    
              transitions.                                                                                     
              Guidance is                                                                                      
              provided for                                                                                     
              position                                                                                         
              determination in                                                                                 
              both vertical                                                                                    
              and lateral                                                                                      
              planes in all                                                                                    
              phases of                                                                                        
              flight. Visual                                                                                   
              NAVAIDS provide                                                                                  
              approach and                                                                                     
              landing guidance                                                                                 
              to aircraft in                                                                                   
              addition to                                                                                      
              electronic type                                                                                  
              NAVAIDS. (NAS                                                                                    
              Navigation)                                                                                      

  Airborne    NAS provides     Digital      Knowledge       Information                           No Reuse     11
  Guidance    signals in       Asset        Management      Sharing                                            
              space, through   Services                                                                        
              space-based                                                                                      
              mechanisms and                                                                                   
              ground-based                                                                                     
              aids, for                                                                                        
              point-in-space                                                                                   
              navigation                                                                                       
              through a                                                                                        
              variety of                                                                                       
              operating                                                                                        
              environments.                                                                                    
              These                                                                                            
              environments                                                                                     
              include                                                                                          
              structured                                                                                       
              routes, random                                                                                   
              routings, and                                                                                    
              transitions.                                                                                     
              Guidance is                                                                                      
              provided for                                                                                     
              position                                                                                         
              determination in                                                                                 
              both vertical                                                                                    
              and lateral                                                                                      
              planes in all                                                                                    
              phases of                                                                                        
              flight. Visual                                                                                   
              NAVAIDS provide                                                                                  
              approach and                                                                                     
              landing guidance                                                                                 
              to aircraft in                                                                                   
              addition to                                                                                      
              electronic type                                                                                  
              NAVAIDS. (NAS                                                                                    
              Navigation)                                                                                      
  ----------- ---------------- ------------ --------------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
|                                                                     |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **Use existing SRM Components or identify as \"NEW\". A \"NEW\"     |   |
| component is one not already identified as a service component in   |   |
| the FEA SRM.**                                                      |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but |   |
| being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no,        |   |
| identify the reused service component funded by the other           |   |
| investment and identify the other investment using the Unique       |   |
| Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53          |   |
| submission.**                                                       |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **\'Internal\' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency   |   |
| within a department is reusing a service component provided by      |   |
| another agency within the same department. \'External\' reuse is    |   |
| one agency within a department reusing a service component provided |   |
| by another agency in another department. A good example of this is  |   |
| an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations  |   |
| across the federal government.**                                    |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount  |   |
| used for each service component listed in the table. If external,   |   |
| provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for  |   |
| the service.**                                                      |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
|                                                                     |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **4. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:**                       |   |
|                                                                     |   |
| **To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA   |   |
| Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas,     |   |
| Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this   |   |
| IT investment.**                                                    |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+

  -------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------------
  **FEA SRM      **FEA TRM        **FEA TRM        **FEA TRM    **Service
  Component**    Service Area**   Service          Service      Specification
                                  Category**       Standard**   (i.e. vendor or
                                                                product name)**

  Information    Service Access   Access Channels  Other        RTCA DO-229C
  Sharing        and Delivery                      Electronic   
                                                   Channels     

  Mapping /      Service Platform Hardware /       Servers /    IBM 43P, IBM P615
  Geospatial /   and              Infrastructure   Computers    
  Elevation /    Infrastructure                                 
  GPS                                                           

  Information    Service Platform Hardware /       Servers /    IBM P615
  Sharing        and              Infrastructure   Computers    
                 Infrastructure                                 

  Mapping /      Service Platform Hardware /       Wide Area    Frame Relay
  Geospatial /   and              Infrastructure   Network      (fraction T1 & T1)
  Elevation /    Infrastructure                    (WAN)        
  GPS                                                           

  Mapping /      Service Platform Support          Platform     IBM AIX with
  Geospatial /   and              Platforms        Dependent    Mission Specific
  Elevation /    Infrastructure                                 Safety-of-life
  GPS                                                           considerations
  -------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **Service Components identified in  
  the previous question should be     
  entered in this column. Please      
  enter multiple rows for FEA SRM     
  Components supported by multiple    
  TRM Service Specifications**        

  **In the Service Specification      
  field, Agencies should provide      
  information on the specified        
  technical standard or vendor        
  product mapped to the FEA TRM       
  Service Standard, including model   
  or version numbers, as              
  appropriate.**                      

                                      

  **5. Will the application leverage  No
  existing components and/or          
  applications across the Government  
  (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?**   

  **   a. If \"yes,\" please          
  describe.**                         

                                      

  **6. Does this investment provide   No
  the public with access to a         
  government automated information    
  system?**                           

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does customer    
  access require specific software    
  (e.g., a specific web browser       
  version)?**                         

  **      1. If \"yes,\" provide the   
  specific product name(s) and        
  version number(s) of the required   
  software and the date when the      
  public will be able to access this  
  investment by any software (i.e. to 
  ensure equitable and timely access  
  of government information and       
  services).**                        

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Exhibit 300: Part II: Planning, Acquisition and Performance
  Information**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
  **II.A. Alternatives Analysis**                                  

                                                                   

  **Part II should be completed only for investments identified as 
  \"Planning\" or \"Full Acquisition,\" or \"Mixed Life-Cycle\"    
  investments in response to Question 6 in Part I, Section A       
  above.**                                                         

  **In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify and   
  consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition to the  
  current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB Circular A- 94   
  for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen Act of 1996 for IT    
  investments, to determine the criteria you should use in your    
  Benefit/Cost Analysis.**                                         

  **1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this           Yes
  project?**                                                       

  **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the date the analysis was            5/3/2004
  completed?**                                                     

  **   b. If \"no,\" what is the anticipated date this analysis     
  will be completed?**                                             

  **   c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain why:** 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **II.B. Risk Management**           

                                      

  **You should have performed a risk  
  assessment during the early         
  planning and initial concept phase  
  of this investment\'s life-cycle,   
  developed a risk-adjusted           
  life-cycle cost estimate and a plan 
  to eliminate, mitigate or manage    
  risk, and be actively managing risk 
  throughout the investment\'s        
  life-cycle.**                       

  **1. Does the investment have a     Yes
  Risk Management Plan?**             

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     6/2/2006
  date of the plan?**                 

  **   b. Has the Risk Management     Yes
  Plan been significantly changed     
  since last year\'s submission to    
  OMB?**                              

  **c. If \"yes,\" describe any       
  significant changes:**              

  WAAS has a proactive iCMM level 3   
  capable risk management process in  
  compliance with the FAA\'s          
  Acquisition Management System. The  
  methodology focuses on mitigation   
  of risks versus assumption and      
  consists of identifying risks       
  before they become critical;        
  analyzing risk data to determine    
  probability and impact to the       
  program; proactively handling the   
  risks by building mitigation plans  
  to reduce, eliminate, or transfer   
  the risks; incorporating            
  mitigations into risk adjusted cost 
  estimates and program schedules,    
  and monitoring risk status and      
  tracking mitigation plans           
  throughout the risk lifecycle. Our  
  risk identification methods are     
  team initiation, quarterly risk     
  inquiries, and semi-annual          
  independent risk assessments. WAAS  
  tracks and documents risk           
  information utilizing the Automated 
  Risk Management System (ARMS). ARMS 
  supports metric analysis and        
  measurement of the performance and  
  quality of work performed. A        
  monthly report provides status and  
  risk activity. Risk Management      
  Board meetings are held             
  periodically to brief the current   
  risk items. ARMS permits entering   
  risks as they are identified,       
  attaching both risk owner and       
  subject matter expert for each      
  risk, quantifying and prioritizing  
  them, and documenting the required  
  risk information. It is also a risk 
  archive storing previous risks,     
  activities strategies performed to  
  close them, and lessons learned.    
  WAAS employs the Satellite          
  Navigation Automated Program        
  Information Tool (SNAPIT) to        
  combine contractor provided and     
  government status data and          
  facilitate review and analysis of   
  contractor and government           
  performance. These analyses         
  identify potential problem areas    
  and surface them to management for  
  corrective action. Cost and         
  schedule reserves have been         
  identified and evaluated. Risks for 
  the added useful segments were      
  identified for a Joint Resources    
  Council decision and are being      
  evaluated. Lessons learned from     
  ARMS are also reviewed and cost and 
  schedule related mitigations are    
  continually evaluated. We are       
  currently tracking 10 risk items: 1 
  high, 3 medium and 6 low risks.     

  **2. If there currently is no plan,  
  will a plan be developed?**         

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     
  planned completion date?**          

  **   b. If \"no,\" what is the      
  strategy for managing the risks?**  

                                      

  **3. Briefly describe how           
  investment risks are reflected in   
  the life cycle cost estimate and    
  investment schedule:**              

  In order to calculate the risk      
  adjusted estimates a thorough risk  
  assessment was conducted for all    
  WAAS life cycle activities. The     
  cost and schedule impact of each    
  identified risk was either fully    
  absorbed or a mitigation identified 
  and costed. These risks and         
  associated costs and schedule       
  impact were documented and included 
  in the WAAS cost basis of estimate. 
  The inclusion of risk in the cost   
  basis of estimate follows a 3 step  
  process. First the calculation of   
  the most likely cost is made as an  
  initial point estimate. Second, all 
  mitigation activities are costed    
  and added to the initial point      
  estimate. Third, a statistical      
  model is established for yet        
  unidentified risks based on         
  accepted program management         
  practices. LPV development activity 
  assumes a PERT distribution with a  
  minimum multiplier of 1, most       
  likely of 1.1, and a maximum        
  multiplier of 1.2. This model is    
  included in \@RISK simulation along 
  with statistical models for known   
  cost uncertainty to calculate the   
  risk adjusted cost estimate.        
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **II.C. Cost and Schedule           
  Performance**                       

                                      

  **1. Does the earned value          Yes
  management system meet the criteria 
  in ANSI/EIA Standard-748?**         

                                      

  **2. Answer the following questions 
  about current cumulative cost and   
  schedule performance. The numbers   
  reported below should reflect       
  current actual information. (Per    
  OMB requirements Cost/Schedule      
  Performance information should      
  include both Government and         
  Contractor Costs):**                

  **   a. What is the Planned Value   265271.311000
  (PV)?**                             

  **   b. What is the Earned Value    264466.411000
  (EV)?**                             

  **   c. What is the actual cost of  287876.648
  work performed (AC)?**              

  **   d. What costs are included in  Contractor and Government
  the reported Cost/Schedule          
  Performance information (Government 
  Only/Contractor Only/Both)?**       

  **   e. \"As of\" date:**           11/30/2006

  **3. What is the calculated         0.677000
  Schedule Performance Index (SPI=    
  EV/PV)?**                           

  **4. What is the schedule variance  -631.331000
  (SV = EV-PV)?**                     

  **5. What is the calculated Cost    1.008000
  Performance Index (CPI = EV/AC)?**  

  **6. What is the cost variance      2213.356000
  (CV=EV-AC)?**                       

  **7. Is the CV% or SV% greater than No
  +/- 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100; SV%=    
  SV/PV x 100)**                      

  **   a. If \"yes,\" was it the?**    

  **   b. If \"yes,\" explain the     
  variance:**                         

                                      

  **   c. If \"yes,\" what corrective 
  actions are being taken?**          

                                      

  **   d. What is most current        349432.073000
  \"Estimate at Completion\"?**       

  **8. Have any significant changes   No
  been made to the baseline during    
  the past fiscal year?**             

  **8. If \"yes,\" when was it        No
  approved by OMB?**                  

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------