1.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 02:37:11 by freepolazzo@comcast.net:**

From: Free Polazzo\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

2.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 02:40:23 by jzimmer@infionline.net**:

From: Elizabeth Zimmerman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

3.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:12:02 by davidwald3@sbcglobal.net**:

From: David Wald\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

4.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:12:04 by ruth.augustine@gmail.com**:

From: Ruth Augustine\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

5.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:12:06 by nancy.mikelsons@pobox.com**:

From: Nancy Mikelsons\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

6.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:12:07 by acleankid@yahoo.com**:

From: Lee Brinkman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

7.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:12:09 by saferrell@wilkes.net**:

From: Sally Ferrell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

8.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:15:33 by ayetfm@umich.edu**:

From: Jim Toy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

9.  **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:53:46 by berlinmadison@netscape.net**:

From: Berlin Madison\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

10. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:53:48 by jeffreyogbar@yahoo.com**:

From: Jeffrey Ogbar\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

11. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:53:49 by epicalc@earthlink.net**:

From: Carolyn Scarr\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

12. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:01 by sepp.babler@segar.com.au:**

From: Sepp Babler\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

13. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:03 by dghorvath@hotmail.com**:

From: David Horvath\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

14. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:04 by janet51339@aol.com**:

From: Janet Beardsley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

15. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:06 by loribarg@together.net**:

From: Lori Barg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

16. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:08 by mariannewidmalm@yahoo.se:**

From: Marianne Widmalm\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

17. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:10 by nca@cruzio.com**:

From: Nancy Andreason\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

18. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:13 by actionnow1@yahoo.com**:

From: Paul Tifford\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

19. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:11 by gwenne9@yahoo.com**:

From: Julie M. Eiserman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

20. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:15 by anna_ghonim@link.net**:

From: Anna Ghonim\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

21. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 03:57:16 by ljustice@centurytel.net**:

From: Lincoln B. Justice\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

22. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:29 by neumluth@aol.com**:

From: Dr. Sara F. Luther\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

23. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:30 by bhawkins@science.smith.edu:**

From: Bruce Hawkins\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

24. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:34 by elena@indra.com:**

From: Ellen Holly Klaver\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

25. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:38 by jenhoyt@comcast.net:**

From: Jennifer Hoyt\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

26. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:40 by eleanorjbader@yahoo.com:**

From: Eleanor Bader\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

27. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:42 by cpfeffer@umich.edu**:

From: Carla Pfeffer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

28. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:00:43 by fwindriver@amherst.edu**:

From: Freddie WindRiver\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

29. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:03:55 by ginnysen@crocker.com:**

From: Ginny Senders\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

30. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:03:57 by justicevision@gmail.com**:

From: Ralph Cole\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

31. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:03:59 by phytophora@yahoo.com:**

From: Spencer Lennard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

32. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:00 by char1954@msn.com:**

From: Char Carroll\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

33. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:02 by editor@sfbayview.com:**

From: Mary Ratcliff\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

34. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:04 by jmkeller99@yahoo.com:**

From: Joyce Keller\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

35. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:06 by mikamuse@juno.com:**

From: Mika Scott\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

36. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:07 by hertz33@earthlink.net:**

From: Lawrence A. Hertz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

37. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:09 by womenunite@yahoo.com**:

From: Daniela Gundling\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

38. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:11 by popemcelvy@gmail.com:**

From: Norman Pope McElvy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

39. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:04:13 by john@morearty.com:**

From: John Morearty\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

40. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:24 by boco4e@bellsouth.net:**

From: Bob Tomashevsky\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

41. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:26 by revbrenda@hotmail.com**:

From: Brenda Champney\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

42. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:27 by mastanek@gmail.com**:

From: Michael A Stanek\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

43. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:29 by wesleydale1964@yahoo.com:**

From: Wesley Sweitzer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

44. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:31 by socialists_us@yahoo.com**:

From: Magy Rateau\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

45. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:33 by alchymie@gmail.com**:

From: Michal Pober\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

46. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:34 by civiletti@comcast.net:**

From: Tom Civiletti\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

47. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:36 by dmokma@jeffnet.org:**

From: Deborah Mokma\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

48. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:38 by geckobanzai@gmail.com:**

From: Don Merlin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

49. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:39 by sbrubin0@att.net:**

From: Sarah Rubin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

50. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:41 by
    prettyprettypussycat@yahoo.com:**

From: Shannon Dodge\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

51. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:07:43 by tyralila@gmail.com:**

From: Dianne L. Tongco\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

52. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:09:54 by bdiluglio@aol.com**:

From: Beth Ellen DiLuglio, MS, RD, CNSD\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

53. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:09:56 by tconnor@hvc.rr.com:**

From: Thomas V. Connor\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

54. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:09:57 by klpneely@yahoo.com**:

From: Katherine Neely\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

55. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:09:59 by vickie530@mail2mars.com**:

From: Victoria J. Beliaeff\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

56. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:01 by edrogerick@yahoo.com**:

From: Roger K. Erickson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

57. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:02 by gusto102@hotmail.com:**

From: Brian Oliveras\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

58. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:04 by dossthane@netscape.net**:

From: Thane Doss\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

59. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:06 by nsmeier@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Nick Meier\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

60. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:08 by stella@mcn.org:**

From: Miriam Simos\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

61. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:09 by willemic@yahoo.com:**

From: Christopher Willemin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

62. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:11 by johnny_lebon@xtoenergy.com:**

From: Johnny LeBon\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

63. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:13 by arkwood@aristotle.net:**

From: Shawn Porter\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

64. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:15 by rain@vanilla.com:**

From: Patricia Rain\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

65. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:16 by laballantine@wavecable.com**:

From: Linda Ballantine\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

66. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:10:18 by optimal@earthlink.net:**

From: Aajonus Vonderplanitz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

67. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:27 by chris@c-metzger.com:**

From: Chris Metzger\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

68. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:29 by teacherkristina@gmail.com**:

From: Kristina McLaughlin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

69. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:30 by sandra.miller@valley.net:**

From: sandra miller\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

70. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:32 by burckintl@aol.com**:

From: Sandra Mardigian\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

71. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:34 by jhcreedsr@aol.com**:

From: John H. Creed\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

72. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:35 by ortizjessie@yahoo.com**:

From: Jessie Ortiz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

73. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:37 by phoebeso@earthlink.net**:

From: PhoeBe ANNE thomas sorgen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

74. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:39 by veganaire@gmail.com:**

From: Aire Celeste Norell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

75. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:41 by jajm4@earthlink.net:**

From: Jodi Ross\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

76. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:42 by beth@eco-store.com:**

From: Beth Hollenbeck\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

77. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:12:44 by tobarb@care2.com:**

From: Barb Bechdol\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

78. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:15:56 by dennisfleming@yahoo.com:**

From: Dennis Teall-Fleming\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

79. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:15:58 by lehouston@yahoo.com:**

From: Lynn Houston\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

80. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:15:59 by mykobar@aol.com:**

From: Barry Cutler\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

81. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:01 by brianderouen@hotmail.com:**

From: Brian DeRouen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

82. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:03 by tjohnst@hotmail.com:**

From: Timothy Johnston\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

83. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:05 by ahaviv@gmail.com**:

From: Ayana Haviv\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

84. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:06 by phoebeso@earthlink.net:**

From: Michael Sorgen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

85. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:08 by nickiep@gmail.com:**

From: Nickie Phillips\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

86. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:10 by jbruce38@hotmail.com:**

From: John Bruce Liles\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

87. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:11 by suereel@editide.us:**

From: Sue Morris\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

88. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:13 by grannyrainbow@msn.com**:

From: Arisa Victor\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

89. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:16:15 by dlpkmb@bmailed.com**:

From: Kevin Bayhouse\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

90. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:27 by
    rlorentzen@collegeofidaho.edu:**

From: Robin Lorentzen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

91. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:28 by healrmn@planeteria.net:**

From: Jason Serinus\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

92. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:30 by
    drnigh@naturecuresclinic.com:**

From: Greg Nigh\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

93. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:32 by jzylman@bellsouth.net:**

From: Jack Zylman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

94. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:34 by mdunkley@mindspring.com**:

From: Michael J. Dunkley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

95. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:35 by marymdean@yahoo.com:**

From: Mary Dean\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

96. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:37 by firranch79@yahoo.com:**

From: Kathy Holt\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

97. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:39 by joani@swansway.com:**

From: Joani Blank\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

98. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:42 by kaluoto@hotmail.com:**

From: Krista Luoto\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

99. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:44 by jherkimer@snet.net:**

From: Judith A. Herkimer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

100. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:46 by lorax@lorax.org:**

From: David Soergel\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

101. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:48 by wishbonegallery@yahoo.com**:

From: Stephanie Lombardo\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

102. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:19:49 by denevan2001@yahoo.com:**

From: Mary Denevan\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

103. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:21:58 by kathie.turner@tds.net:**

From: Kathleen Kaeding Turner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

104. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:22:00 by bert.golding@gmail.com**:

From: Bert Golding\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

105. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:17 by sweeter010@charter.net:**

From: Frances Haas\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

106. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:18 by marque@wiznet.ca**:

From: Marque Brill\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

107. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:20 by travelin@starband.net:**

From: Linda McVarish\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

108. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:22 by sevenstarsp@hotmail.com**:

From: Christopher Michaels\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

109. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:24 by tuggle.melissa@yahoo.com:**

From: Melissa Tuggle\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

110. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:25 by babshinde@hotmail.com**:

From: Barbara Hinde\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

111. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:27 by nfreem@pacbell.net:**

From: Nancy Freeman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

112. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:29 by kittymalone78@yahoo.com**:

From: Daniel Benedict\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

113. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:31 by betzy@aol.com:**

From: Ruth Busch\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

114. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:32 by gsonne@sover.net**:

From: Gina Sonne\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

115. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:34 by fruviad@yahoo.com**:

From: Peter Kukla\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

116. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:28:36 by ninalhco@yahoo.com:**

From: Nina Wouk\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

117. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:44 by
     robert.spottswood@valley.net:**

From: Bob Spottswood\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

118. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:46 by enriquesantos@yahoo.com**:

From: Enrique Santos\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

119. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:48 by diehardd@bellsouth.net:**

From: Bob Hupf\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

120. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:50 by nycakaren@yahoo.com:**

From: Karen McAuley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

121. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:51 by daanania@yahoo.com:**

From: Dale Anania\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

122. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:53 by sgberg@pacbell.net:**

From: Stephen Greenberg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

123. Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:55 by eldon@afes.com:

From: Jim Eldon\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

124. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:57 by sabrejet86@suddenlink.net:**

From: Barbara Horning\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

125. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:30:58 by ljrademacher@gmail.com:**

From: Lisa J. Rademacher\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

126. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:31:00 by kevincbaird@gmail.com**:

From: Kevin, Baird, Mr.\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

127. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:31:02 by nancy@salwen.net:**

From: Nancy Salwen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

128. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:13 by erwaxman@yahoo.com**:

From: Edward R. Waxman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

129. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:15 by dxh11@psu.edu:**

From: Dorn Hetzel\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

130. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:17 by drjnola@gmail.com:**

From: Dedra Johnson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

131. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:19 by georgielu@yahoo.com:**

From: Laura Bong\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

132. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:20 by jlo5@cornell.edu:**

From: Joan Ormondroyd\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

133. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:22 by greg@bostoncoop.net:**

From: Greg Kimber\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

134. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:24 by ssheldon@hctc.com:**

From: Sue Sheldon\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

135. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:26 by mjschoenmail@yahoo.com**:

From: Martin Schoen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

136. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:27 by jhshulman1@yahoo.com:**

From: Joseph Shulman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

137. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:29 by artbass@optonline.net:**

From: Frank Murphy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

138. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:31 by jgazurian@verizon.net:**

From: John Gazurian\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

139. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:32 by sasha@sashasroots.com:**

From: Sasha Mitchell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

140. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:34 by mandyspit@yahoo.com**:

From: Mandy Spitzer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

141. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:36 by khemidwife@earthlink.net:**

From: Karen Ehrlich\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

142. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:38 by lgibson@mail.smu.edu:**

From: Lee Gibson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

143. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:39 by rayka7@comcast.net:**

From: Ray Andrews\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

144. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:34:41 by contaminated1@hotmail.com:**

From: Tami Labig-Duquette\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming

145. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:36:50 by jstenger8@aol.com:**

From: Jason Stenger\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

146. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:36:52 by the2toms@earthlink.net:**

From: Thomas E. O\'Grady\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

147. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:36:53 by jimhooper1@gmail.com**:

From: James M. Hooper\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

148. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:36:55 by o7@centurytel.net:**

From: Tom Walls\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

149. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:36:57 by doug.mcneill@wap.org:**

From: Douglas McNeill\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

150. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:36:59 by
     charleshixsn@earthlink.net:**

From: Charles Hixson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

151. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:00 by jeromecarp@yahoo.com**:

From: Jerome A. Carpenter\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

152. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:02 by hippie@aye.net:**

From: Michrel L. Standefer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

153. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:04 by ohdhalia@yahoo.com:**

From: Daria Harrison\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

154. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:06 by jafox@hickorytech.net:**

From: Janice Arlene Fox\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

155. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:07 by susanek@umich.edu**:

From: Susan Kennedy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

156. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:09 by willpe@consolidated.net:**

From: William Ellsworth\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

157. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:11 by joycebanzhaf@yahoo.com**:

From: Joyce Banzhaf\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

158. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:37:12 by kevin.conn@seminis.com:**

From: Kevin E. Conn\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

159. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:39:22 by glen@olywa.net:**

From: Glen Anderson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

160. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:39:23 by terrystone127@yahoo.com**:

From: Terry Stone\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

161. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:39:25 by earthsangha@onebox.com**:

From: David Cayford\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

162. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:39:27 by
     joankwilliamson@hotmail.com**:

From: Joan Swan\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

163. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:39:29 by vmereski@yahoo.com**:

From: E. Victor Mereski, USN Ret E9\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

164. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:39:30 by plotto@verizon.net:**

From: Peter Lotto\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

165. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:41:58 by franceshillyard@webtv.net:**

From: Frances Hillyard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

166. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:00 by bstrange@hughes.net:**

From: William Strange\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

167. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:02 by kvet1@aol.com**:

From: John Weber\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

168. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:03 by dharmablue@hotmail.com**:

From: William Holley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

169. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:05 by judpeace@charter.net:**

From: Judi Poulson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

170. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:07 by planefix@aol.com**:

From: Larry L. Daigneault\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

171. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:09 by bivbabe@cs.com:**

From: Amy Biven\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

172. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:10 by ellen@clicheideas.com:**

From: Ellen Hobbs\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

173. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:12 by poursistance@hotmail.com:**

From: Jennis Brandon-Watson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

174. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:14 by ethelsdatr@aol.com:**

From: Karen Lind\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

175. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:15 by lsartor@inreach.com**:

From: Linda Sartor\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

176. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:17 by srcrenshaw@charter.net:**

From: Shirley Crenshaw\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

177. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:42:19 by
     laura.baalman@nym.hush.com:**

From: Laura Anne Baalman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

178. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:28 by ohcat9@earthlink.net:**

From: Cat. O\'Reilly\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

179. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:30 by plengstrom@cfl.rr.com**:

From: Peggy Javellana\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

**Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:32 by cosjonathan@indy.rr.com:**

From: Jonathan Kraeszig and Cos Raimondi\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

180. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:33 by jeannes119@aol.com:**

From: Jeanne Sears\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

181. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:35 by smgarcia@imap.cc**:

From: Sara García\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

182. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:37 by gormnm@earthlink.net:**

From: Gregg Mau\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

183. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:38 by deansweberg@gmail.com**:

From: Dean A. Sweberg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

184. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:40 by sheak@ohio.edu:**

From: Bob Sheak\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

185. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:42 by beery1@comcast.net:**

From: Ian Cooper\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

186. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:44:44 by desert_friar@hotmail.com:**

From: William H. Papineau\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

187. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:47:55 by beckyrep@aol.com**:

From: Rebecca English\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

188. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:47:57 by progsec@buddhaverse.us**:

From: BC Capps\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

189. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:47:59 by alicezillah@yahoo.com:**

From: Alice Zillah\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

190. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:01 by box@jbstoler.com**:

From: Joshua Bernstein\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

191. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:02 by billtc29@gmail.com**:

From: William Cowan\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

192. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:04 by sbillec1@fairview.org:**

From: Stephanie Billecke\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

193. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:06 by dorothea@yarinareth.net:**

From: Dorothea Salo\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

194. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:08 by cjester2@juno.com:**

From: Sarah Dillon\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

195. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:09 by pennylane@swva.net:**

From: Penny Lane\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

196. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:11 by dosconejos@comcast.net:**

From: Patrice Titterington\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

197. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:13 by ramona_mcnabb@hotmail.com:**

From: Ramona McNabb\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

198. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:14 by drsbar@aol.com:**

From: Sandra Barton\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

199. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:16 by aw@intertwist.com**:

From: Adam Wolman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

200. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:18 by mrsbancroft@webtv.net:**

From: Anne Bancroft\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

201. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:20 by artraab@clearwire.net:**

From: W. Arthur Raab\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

202. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:21 by ami.tallman@gmail.com:**

From: Ami Renee Tallman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

203. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:23 by dajus@earthlink.net**:

From: Barbara A. Porter\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

204. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:48:25 by peasnpeg@comcast.net:**

From: Margaret Wilbur\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

205. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:34 by murugan.pandian@gmail.com:**

From: Murugan Pandian\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

206. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:35 by bethlillian@juno.com**:

From: Beth Ribet\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

207. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:37 by bettytim@yahoo.com**:

From: Stephanie Hammett\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

208. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:39 by
     jeanettecool@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Jeanette Cool\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

209. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:41 by chelacheelo@aol.com:**

From: Michele Benderra\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

210. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:42 by bonnob@cruzio.com:**

From: Bonno Bernard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

211. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:44 by dindamcp4@yahoo.com:**

From: Dinda Evans\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

212. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:46 by neilaltman@hotmail.com**:

From: Neil Altman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

213. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:48 by matulich_2@msn.com:**

From: Shirley A. Matulich\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

214. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:49 by gonzotime@verizon.net:**

From: Pete R. Gonzalez\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

215. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:51 by ladyk2u@aol.com**:

From: Karen Shelley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

216. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:53 by grcomm@grcomm.cnc.net:**

From: George R Robinson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

217. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:54 by
     timothy.l.taylor@gmail.com:**

From: Timothy L. Taylor\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

218. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:56 by rjackswede@aol.com:**

From: Jack Engberg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

219. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:50:58 by ebluedancer@msn.com:**

From: Azul Dancer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

220. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:51:00 by wilcoxrb99@ybb.ne.jp:**

From: Richard B. Wilcox\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

221. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:09 by karen4board@aol.com:**

From: Erik Shelley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

222. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:11 by ladyk2u@aol.com**:

From: William Shelley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

223. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:12 by georja@adelphia.net**:

From: Georja Umano Jones\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

224. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:14 by themaurens@yahoo.com:**

From: Mark Mauren\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

225. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:16 by wesleydale1964@yahoo.com:**

From: Karen Booth\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

226. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:17 by hermacinda@aol.com:**

From: Roberto Gautier\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

227. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:19 by
     jennifer.weishaar@gmail.com**:

From: Jennifer M Weishaar\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

228. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:21 by catastrophile@gmail.com:**

From: Eric C. Cole\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

229. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:23 by rhonda-r@cox.net:**

From: Rhonda Rudd\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

230. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:24 by
     marthakaplan@earthlink.net:**

From: Martha B. Kaplan\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

231. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:26 by kellykuntz76@yahoo.com**:

From: Kelly Kuntz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

232. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:53:28 by jjkjr@mcloudteleco.com:**

From: John Kloiber\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

233. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:39 by zafu@comcast.net:**

From: Margaret Weimer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

234. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:41 by britten_clark@yahoo.com:**

From: Britten Clark\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

235. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:43 by gandjt@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Burnis E. Tuck\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

236. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:44 by aliepow28@yahoo.com:**

From: Alice Powell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

237. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:46 by cpearson@riseup.net:**

From: Clifford B. Pearson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

238. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:48 by kaykay1949@aol.com**:

From: Karen White\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

239. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:50 by sembl001@tc.umn.edu**:

From: Douglas Sembla\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

240. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:51 by pjveck@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Paula Le Veck\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

241. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:53 by trf.hernandez@gmail.com:**

From: Tonya Hernandez\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

242. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:55 by bronxtc@aol.com:**

From: T. Cho\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

243. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:57 by vargold@gmail.com**:

From: Karl\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

244. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:56:58 by jonihatlady@yahoo.com**:

From: Joni Handley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

245. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:57:00 by
     serenitylodge@bellsouth.net:**

From: Jon Markle\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

246. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:57:02 by garrysisco@verizon.net:**

From: Garry Sisco\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

247. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:57:03 by jlpoxon@netscape.net:**

From: Judith L. Poxon\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

248. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:57:05 by fenix22@verizon.net**:

From: Dorian Caruso\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

249. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:57:07 by lilyfishpond@yahoo.com**:

From: Bobbie Richardson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

250. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:57:09 by douglasn@rocketmail.com**:

From: Douglas Narveson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

251. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:18 by kralarie@rushmore.com:**

From: Kim R. Alarie\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

252. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:20 by tundradoc@hotmail.com:**

From: Daniel J. Herman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

253. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:21 by dieter.randolph@gmail.com:**

From: Dieter Randolph\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

254. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:23 by tom.trigg@gmail.com:**

From: Thomas K. Trigg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

255. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:25 by peaceturtle1942@yahoo.com:**

From: Ruth Anne van Veenendaal\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

256. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:26 by mnelson@nl.edu:**

From: Marie W. Nelson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

257. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:28 by
     john.ellsworth3@verizon.net:**

From: John O. Ellsworth\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

258. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:30 by smacarol@hotmail.com:**

From: Carolyne L. Schmidt\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

259. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:32 by
     cherylshomeaddress@yahoo.com:**

From: Cheryl Hall\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

260. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:33 by uncleglenn@yahoo.com:**

From: Glenn\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

261. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:35 by rltyexec3@aol.com:**

From: Mary West\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

262. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:37 by wolf1929@bellsouth.net:**

From: Billie Wolf\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

263. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:39 by venis.white@gmail.com:**

From: Venis D. White\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

264. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:40 by a.lott@yahoo.com:**

From: Alan Lott\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

265. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:42 by ejmurphy@amherst.edu:**

From: Pat Murphy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

266. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 04:59:44 by eric_s_berger@yahoo.com:**

From: Eric S. Berger\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

267. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:01:53 by cmwdms@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Cecile M. Dobelbower\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

268. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:01:55 by joycedevlin@yahoo.com:**

From: Joyce Devlin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

269. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:01:56 by robynocpt@yahoo.com:**

From: Robyn L. Class\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

270. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:01:58 by maculatum@aol.com**:

From: Tim Zorach\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

271. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:00 by kobutsu@engaged-zen.org:**

From: Venerable Kobutsu Malone, zenji\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

272. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:02 by kokomo57@msn.com:**

From: Donald L. Bruestle\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

273. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:03 by patrickmert@yahoo.com:**

From: Patrick Mertens\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

274. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:05 by harrieth2@aol.com:**

From: Harriet J. Hirsch\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

275. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:07 by robroost@empacc.net:**

From: Rob Litchfield\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

276. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:09 by ncohen12@comcast.net:**

From: Norm T. Cohen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

277. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:10 by ckrugman@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Charles L. Krugman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

278. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:02:12 by
     margegianelli@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Marge Gianelli\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

279. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:24 by cortezco@rcn.com:**

From: Hernan Cortez\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

280. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:26 by r_j_shwedo@hotmail.com**:

From: Robin J. Shwedo\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

281. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:27 by dave@daveonline.us**:

From: David P. Eaton\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

282. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:29 by visions4angels@yahoo.com:**

From: Wendy.Yona NooN\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

283. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:31 by genie36936@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Marion E. Lamb\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

284. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:33 by neumluth@aol.com:**

From: Dr. John J. Neumaier\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

285. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:34 by idanissen1112@msn.com:**

From: Ida Nissen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

286. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:36 by robert.c.ogden@gmail.com**:

From: Robert Clark Ogden\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

287. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:38 by chungkat@hawaii.edu:**

From: Kathryn Chung\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

288. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:39 by kittymalone78@yahoo.com:**

From: Kelly Murphy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

289. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:41 by mhellet7@gmail.com:**

From: Mary Helen Ellet\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

290. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:43 by fredrosen@cavtel.net:**

From: Frederick Rosen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

291. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:45 by lacyoden@gmail.com:**

From: Lacy E. Oden\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

292. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:46 by tcauchon@gmail.com:**

From: Therese Isabelle Cauchon\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

293. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:05:48 by vannicole@webtv.net:**

From: Mary R. Van Hoy-Sink\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

294. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:07:57 by
     marian.cruz2903@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Marian Cruz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

295. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:07:59 by sanpatricio@earthlink.net:**

From: Antonio James Camillo Sepeda\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

296. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:01 by kidslovescience@gmail.com:**

From: Pam Campbell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

297. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:03 by impete80@yahoo.com**:

From: Peter Ponzetti\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

298. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:04 by pivory@ozemail.com.au:**

From: Paul E. Ivory\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

299. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:06 by cussery@frontiernet.net:**

From: Clyde Ussery\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

300. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:08 by nestlewood@peoplepc.com:**

From: Peggy A. Detmers\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

301. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:10 by atia2@optonline.net:**

From: Bo and Natalie Jarnstedt\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

302. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:11 by spikespisak@aol.com**:

From: Dennis S. Spisak\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

303. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:13 by bj.lightner@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Barbara E. Lightner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

304. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:15 by toemansdance@netscape.net:**

From: Anthony Sansone\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

305. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:16 by sydbarrett74@gmail.com:**

From: Victor Escobar\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

306. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:08:18 by thaugen@uci.edu:**

From: Tammie Haugen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

307. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:27 by jomagwic42@aol.com:**

From: Joanne D. Ferguson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

308. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:29 by elzantho1@aol.com:**

From: Elizabeth A. Anthony\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

309. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:30 by skylights76@gmail.com:**

From: John Franson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

310. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:32 by mommavroom@aol.com**:

From: Sissy Needell-Riffin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

311. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:34 by aw767@lafn.org:**

From: May Ellam\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

312. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:36 by savdavid@bellsouth.net:**

From: James Martin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

313. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:37 by mauricesloane@yahoo.com:**

From: MAURICE L. SLOANE II\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

314. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:10:39 by delanoir@alltel.net**:

From: Richard Skinner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

315. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:13:51 by mirvineop@sanrafaelop.org:**

From: Marion H. Irvine\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

316. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:13:53 by
     peacemaker.ymani@gmail.com:**

From: Ymani Simmons\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

317. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:13:54 by paul.schaeffer@gmail.com:**

From: Paul J. Schaeffer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

318. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:13:56 by jhshulman1@cox.net**:

From: Barbara Shulman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

319. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:13:58 by tawanyhlgr@hotmail.com:**

From: Tawanyh L. Rozin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

320. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:14:00 by matthewrabbitt@yahoo.com:**

From: Matthew Rabbitt\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

321. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:14:01 by lehouston@yahoo.com:**

From: Harrison Houston\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

322. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:17:13 by smcbeath@indy.net**:

From: The Rev. Susan A. McBeath\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

323. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:17:15 by aharlib@earthlink.net:**

From: Amy Harlib\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

324. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:17:17 by jimklausen@yahoo.com:**

From: James Klausen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

325. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:28 by talltrees@centurytel.net:**

From: Rachel A. Garner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

326. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:30 by
     bettyfox3905@roadrunner.com:**

From: Betty Lou Fox\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

327. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:32 by woser@comcast.net**:

From: Wendy Oser\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

328. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:34 by jhminshall@comcast.net:**

From: Janet Minshall\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

329. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:35 by fego@pacbell.net:**

From: Ernie Goitein\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

330. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:37 by
     mark_woolbright@earthlink.net:**

From: Mark Woolbright\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

331. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 05:20:39 by jody_heatlie@pmug.org**:

From: Jody Heatlie\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

332. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:18 by
     hagstrom@uclink4.berkeley.edu:**

From: Susan Hagstrom\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

333. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:20 by gtenney@earthlink.net:**

From: Gerry Tenney\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

334. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:22 by berg@sonic.net:**

From: Roberta Berg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

335. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:23 by doretk@sonic.net:**

From: Doret Kollerer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

336. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:25 by prigoffa@saclink.csus.edu:**

From: Arline Prigoff\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

337. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:27 by hugolane@gmail.com**:

From: Hugh Lane\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

338. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 06:58:29 by om_nm87556@yahoo.com:**

From: Orlando Martinez\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

339. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:41 by whawk39564@aol.com:**

From: Bill Hawkins\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

340. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:43 by
     j-boudart@northwestern.edu:**

From: Jan Boudart\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

341. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:44 by wibberkeley@yahoo.com:**

From: Jane Welford\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

342. Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:46 by lpla@earthlink.net:

From: Kathleen O\'nan\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

343. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:48 by auntdawn@charter.net:**

From: Dawn Rubbert\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

344. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:49 by urszulaba@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Urszula Frydman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

345. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:51 by jgiddings@igc.org:**

From: Jim Giddings\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

346. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:53 by conjoin@macnexus.org:**

From: Darien De De Lu\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

347. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:55 by annarky@excite.com:**

From: Carol Liu\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

348. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:56 by myronchapman@verizon.net:**

From: Myron Chapman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

349. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:01:58 by astatton@comcast.net:**

From: Anne E. Statton\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

350. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:02:00 by welford@hawaii.edu:**

From: Gabrielle Welford\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

351. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:02:02 by k.wc@verizon.net:**

From: Karen Wood-Campbell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

352. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:02:03 by eeconn@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Eric Conn\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

353. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:12 by dolan@spinn.net:**

From: P. Dolan\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

354. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:14 by gwingard@earthlink.net**:

From: Greg Wingard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

355. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:16 by edmays@clearwire.net:**

From: Ed Mays\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

356. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:17 by marcialmason@gmail.com:**

From: Marcia Mason\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

357. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:19 by bh3cat@aol.com:**

From: Barb Howard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

358. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:21 by p_bossert@yahoo.com:**

From: Patti Bossert\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower

deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

359. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:22 by
     alejandra_suarez@hotmail.com:**

From: Alejandra Suarez\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

360. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:24 by rezegrats@yahoo.com:**

From: Chris Owen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

361. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:26 by aswift@physics.umass.edu:**

From: Alice Swift\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

362. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:28 by tpowen1@yahoo.com**:

From: Tom Owen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

363. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:29 by dave@jettes.org:**

From: Dave Jette\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

364. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:31 by bertskellie@gmail.com:**

From: Bert Skellie\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

365. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:33 by jbearden@ieee.org**:

From: Jim Bearden\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

366. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:35 by edieuber@yahoo.com:**

From: Edie Uber\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

367. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:36 by
     keikokub@uclink.berkeley.edu**:

From: Keiko Kubo\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

368. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:04:38 by
     charliehancock@earthlink.net:**

From: Charlie Hancock\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

369. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:47 by jamestp@tampabay.rr.com:**

From: Jim Peterson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

370. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:49 by cedar@ymail.com:**

From: Cedar Dvorin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

371. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:51 by ufdionysus@aol.com:**

From: Michael Adler\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

372. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:52 by pstonge@pacbell.net:**

From: Pat Onge\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

373. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:54 by nwkellner@centurytel.net:**

From: Neal Kellner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

374. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:56 by
     dubielzr@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu:**

From: Dick Dubielzig\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

375. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:58 by joeycarey@gmail.com:**

From: Joey Carey\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

376. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:06:59 by dquesnel@pacifier.com**:

From: Donna Quesnell\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

377. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:07:01 by annesmith37@yahoo.com:**

From: Anne Smith\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

378. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:07:03 by patriot451@aol.com:**

From: Robin Crane\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

379. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:07:04 by jlz@psconsult.com:**

From: Janet Zampieri\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

380. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:07:06 by popmomdieter@aol.com:**

From: Alison Dieter\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

381. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:07:08 by mblick@cox.net:**

From: Maurie Blick\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

382. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:07:10 by vicki@downeast.net:**

From: Vicki Cohn Pollard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

383. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:18 by jeanpatt@ice.co.cr:**

From: Jean Patterson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

384. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:20 by jdkc@woptura.com:**

From: J.D. Kotrla-Chipps\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

385. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:22 by jthom3815@aol.com:**

From: John Thomas\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

386. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:24 by sndrosep@aol.com:**

From: Rosalie M. Pizzo, SND\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

387. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:25 by
     rbalsley@alum.calberkeley.org:**

From: Rachel Balsley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

388. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:27 by ehrlicht@hotmail.com:**

From: Tony Ehrlich\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

389. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:29 by jwinsberg@earthlink.net:**

From: Julie Winsberg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

390. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:31 by adelek@alltel.net:**

From: Adele Kushner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

391. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:32 by wpeltz@nycap.rr.com:**

From: William I. Peltz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

392. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:34 by jeanpatt@ice.co.cr:**

From: Jean Patterson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

393. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:36 by jwhite4708@aol.com:**

From: Jane White\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

394. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:37 by riverbend2@earthlink.net:**

From: John R. Battista, M.D.\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

395. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:39 by rbriden1@juno.com:**

From: Renate Bridenthal\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

396. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:41 by revolu@earthlink.net:**

From: Marcia Newfield\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

397. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:43 by s2vs@yahoo.com:**

From: Stewart Snider\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

398. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:09:44 by madams12@earthlink.net**:

From: Miriam Adams\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

399. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:11:54 by irisf845@msn.com:**

From: Iris Freelander\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

400. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:11:55 by mgdevlin@comcast.net:**

From: Mary Devlin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

401. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:11:57 by phamm001@earthlink.net**:

From: Paulette Hammond\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

402. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:11:59 by lizzzrd@optonline.net:**

From: Elizabeth Casey\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

403. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:01 by d.banner@mchsi.com**:

From: Dr. David Banner\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

404. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:02 by hoedown@hvc.rr.com:**

From: Joyce Hartsfield\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

405. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:04 by clarkjd@frontiernet.net:**

From: Donald Clark\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

406. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:06 by monniereba@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Monnie Efross\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

407. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:08 by sweeton@umich.edu:**

From: Jim Sweeton\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

408. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:09 by mayomiguel72@hotmail.com:**

From: Mike Mayo\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

409. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:11 by bbrown@willitsonline.com:**

From: Betsy Brown\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

410. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:13 by bertmarro@hotmail.com:**

From: Bertino Marro\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

411. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:15 by
     robertwsimpson@verizon.net:**

From: Robert Simpson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

412. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:16 by nmonster@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Neal P. Austin\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

413. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:12:18 by friend02825@yahoo.com:**

From: Frank S. Sterrett\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

414. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:27 by brucesj@aol.com:**

From: Dr. Jarstfer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

415. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:29 by jccovici@earthlink.net**:

From: Joan Covici\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

416. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:30 by cpellett@cnw.com:**

From: Howard Pellett\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

417. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:32 by superjan@webtv.net:**

From: Janice Norberg\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

418. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:34 by missivonne@yahoo.com:**

From: Ivonne Rovira\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

419. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:35 by mvconn@hotmail.com:**

From: Maya Conn\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

420. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:37 by mjhfos@aol.com:**

From: Jane Hanna\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

421. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:39 by millory@msn.com:**

From: Roy Jaffe\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

422. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:41 by judithkatz@yahoo.com:**

From: Judith Katz\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

423. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:14:42 by ambwww@yahoo.com**:

From: Alicia Banks\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

424. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:17:54 by vgilmoredove@aol.com**:

From: Virginia Gilmore\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

425. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:17:56 by
     cponnet@stcamillus.ftml.net:**

From: Fr. Chris Ponnet\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

426. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:17:57 by vicky@boulder.net:**

From: Vicky A. Peterson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

427. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:17:59 by brorichard@earthlink.net:**

From: Richard Hawley\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

428. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:01 by ehegeman@pipeline.com**:

From: Elizabeth Hegeman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

429. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:03 by
     marcuschristian@hotmail.com:**

From: Chris Hansen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

430. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:04 by mariesutter@zianet.com:**

From: Marie Sutter\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

431. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:06 by bazzario1@verizon.net:**

From: Bazzario Coljohn\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

432. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:08 by judylightstone@yahoo.com:**

From: Judy Lightstone\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

433. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:10 by cpn@cwo.com:**

From: James Israel\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

434. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:11 by rgpbarnes@yahoo.com:**

From: Jim Meyer\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

435. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:13 by barbaragibbs@yahoo.com**:

From: Barbara Gibbs\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

436. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:15 by strasoff@hotmail.com:**

From: Stephanie Trasoff\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

437. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:18 by marc@msanson.com:**

From: Marc D. Sanson\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

438. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:20 by 2mjb@mindspring.com**:

From: Mary Jo Ballator\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

439. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:22 by goodhelp@nets.com:**

From: Shelley Buonaiuto\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

440. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:24 by mignon_belongie@yahoo.com:**

From: Mignon Belongie\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

441. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:25 by kalmkalm@msn.com**:

From: Lowen Berman\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

442. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:27 by kendigit@yahoo.com:**

From: Susie Kendig\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

443. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:18:29 by djinja@yahoo.com**:

From: Alice Crawford\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

444. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:37 by clownpoppy@msn.com:**

From: Tavia Gilbert\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

445. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:39 by timopp@post.harvard.edu:**

From: Tim Oppenheim\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

446. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:41 by elliotspark@yahoo.com**:

From: Elliot Margolies\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

447. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:43 by laurel50@aol.com**:

From: Laurel Smith\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

448. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:45 by afshields@earthlink.net:**

From: Alice Shields\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

449. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:46 by osbornk@gmail.com**:

From: Kyre Osborn\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

450. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:48 by zoezolbrod@hotmail.com:**

From: Zoe Zolbrod\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

451. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:20:50 by schampion@commspeed.net:**

From: Stacey Champion\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

452. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:23:20 by mstordy@sbcglobal.net:**

From: Danielle Stordy\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

453. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:23:22 by marysedrop@msn.com:**

From: Mary Shesgreen\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

454. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:23:24 by jabwab@msn.com:**

From: Jean Basinger\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

455. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:23:25 by wills@grandecom.net:**

From: Elizabeth Wills\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

456. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:26:37 by philipkain@yahoo.com:**

From: Philip J. Kain\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

457. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:26:39 by jjart@pacific.net:**

From: John Arteaga\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

458. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:26:41 by doshin@whidbey.com**:

From: Shinsan Griswold\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

459. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:29:52 by ozinsac@aol.com:**

From: James R Ozanich\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.

Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

460. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:29:54 by realiteee1@yahoo.com:**

From: James Nordlund\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

461. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:29:55 by jhubbard@pld.com:**

From: Jerold Hubbard\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has proposed
requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased from 27.5 miles
per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015.\
\
The site 40MPG.org posts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please urge the NHTSA to revise its proposed standards upwards, to
reduce our dependence on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow
global warming.

462. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:29:57 by alyguy@hotmail.com:**

From: Alan Young\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.

463. **Entered on 09/02/2008 at 07:33:09 by jendryden@juno.com:**

From: Jennifer Dryden\
Comments:\
We need to move faster on fuel efficiency!\
\
Your proposal requiring that passenger car fuel economy be increased
from 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015 is not
adequate.\
\
The site 40MPG.org hosts evidence that 40 m.p.g. can be reached using
today\'s technology.\
\
Please revise your proposed standards upwards, to reduce our dependence
on foreign oil, lower deadly emissions, and slow global warming.