BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
May 21, 2008

OSHA Docket Office

U.S. Department of Labor

Room N-2625

200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20210

Re: Docket No. OSHA-2008-0005

> 73 [FR]{.underline} 26431

Dear Docket Officer:

The International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA) requests a
sixty-day extension on the deadline to file comments on the "Proposed
Guidance on Workplace Stockpiling of Respirators and Facemasks for
Pandemic Influenza\'\'. The current deadline to file comments is July 8,
2008.

We request this extension because respiratory protection manufacturers
will gather for their annual summer policy forum July 27-28. These
manufacturers will devote a substantial portion of their meeting to this
proposed guidance. ISEA believes that a full discussion and thoughtful
review of this proposed guidance by manufacturers of respiratory
protection (including facemasks) will yield better information for OSHA.

Thank you for your time and attention to this request for additional
time to file comments. Please contact me at 703-525-1695 with any
questions or for additional information.

Sincerely,

Daniel K. Shipp

President

/media/pszemraj/PeterTrove/project-files/DATA/ms-word-files/big-DOC/888032.doc
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Department of Health and Human Services | CONTRACTOR'S NAME          |
|                                         |                            |
| National Institutes of Health           |                            |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+
| **Final Certification of**              | CONTRACT NO.               |
|                                         |                            |
| **Acceptable Costs**                    |                            |
+-----------------------------------------+----------------------------+

I hereby certify that I have examined the Contractor's invoice
representing final costs under the referenced contract. To the best of
my knowledge and belief the items for which reimbursement is to be made,
together with all costs previously claimed and reimbursed for a total
amount of \$[     ]{.underline} under this contract are in agreement
with the Contractor's Release (where required) and were necessarily
incurred in the performance of the work under said contract.

The Contractor has performed acceptable services as stated in the
contract and is not now in default under said contract in furnishing
reports, disclosures, licenses, equipment or any other tangible articles
required under the terms of the contract; therefore, final payment in
the amount of \$[     ]{.underline} is hereby approved.

Pursuant to FAR 4.804-5 (a) (12) and HHSAR 304.804-70, the required
audit has been performed.

> *The following shall be completed when applicable:*

1.  Deobligation of funds in the amount of \$[     ]{.underline} is
    authorized.

2.  A refund in the amount of \$[     ]{.underline} due to U.S.
    Government should be collected if not previously refunded.

+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| CONTRACTING OFFICER                              | DATE              |
|                                                  |                   |
|                                                  |                   |
+--------------------------------------------------+-------------------+

NIH 1154-3 (Rev. 1/07)
March 5, 2007

Regulatory Analysis and Development

PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8

4700 River Road Unit 118

Riverdale, MD 20737-1238

**Re: Docket No. APHIS-2006-0186 (Importation of Uncooked Pork and Pork
Products)**

SENASICA, a part of the Secretariat of Agriculture of Mexico,
appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the above proposed
rule and would like to express its support for this rule and for the
terms and conditions set forth therein, which are based on science.

SENASICA supports this proposed amendment to the regulation since it
removes unnecessary restrictions to the importation of meat products
from Mexico, while it ensures the necessary level of zoosanitary
protection to the US pork industry. Likewise, SENASICA encourages
USDA-APHIS to expedite the rulemaking process in order to have this rule
in place as soon as possible.

Having this rule in place is a signal to U.S. trading partners that the
US is adjusting its regulatory framework to conform with international
standards.

Sincerely,

Enrique Sánchez Cruz

Executive Director

SENASICA-SAGARPA

5 de marzo de 2007

Regulatory Analysis and Development

PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8

4700 River Road Unit 118

Riverdale, MD 20737-1238

**Re: Docket No. APHIS-2006-0186 (Importation of Uncooked Pork and Pork
Products)**

El Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria
(SENASICA) como parte de la Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería,
Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación de México, agradece la
oportunidad brindada para proporcionar comentarios a la propuesta de
regla antes mencionada. En este sentido queremos manifestar nuestro
apoyo a la misma así como a los términos y condiciones ahí expuestas las
cuales se basan en elementos científicos.

SENASICA apoya las modificaciones propuestas a la regulación dado que
elimina restricciones innecesarias a las importaciones a los Estados
Unidos de productos cárnicos de México, mientras que asegura el nivel
apropiado de protección zoosanitaria a la producción porcícola de los
EUA. Asimismo, SENASICA invita a USDA --APHIS a que acelere el proceso
regulatorio para que esta propuesta de regla entre en vigor lo más
pronto posible.

Finalmente, SENASICA quiere manifestar que una vez teniendo en vigor
esta regla se estará enviando una señal a los socios comerciales de los
EUA en el sentido de que el marco regulatorio se está ajustando en
conformidad a los estándares internacionales.

Atentamente,

Enrique Sánchez Cruz

Director en Jefe del SENASICA

SENASICA-SAGARPA
FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE

ARBITRATION STATISTICS

**FISCAL YEAR 2002**

**AVERAGES**

**AVERAGE DOLLAR AMOUNTS (BASED ON ALL AWARDS):**

Per Diem Rate \$ 720.75

Fee \$ 2,884.46

Expenses \$ 318.03

Total Charge \$ 3,202.49

**AVERAGE DAYS DURATION (BASED ON ALL AWARDS):**

Hearing Time 1.09

Travel Time .45

Study Time 2.44

Total Time 3.98

**MISCELLANEOUS TOTALS**

**ISSUES**:

Awards Where No Issues Were Indicated 779

Awards Indicating Only One Issue 775

Awards Indicating More Than One Issue 1115

Total 2669

WAIVERS:

On Due Dates Of Awards 301

**BRIEFS**:

Filed 2186

Not Filed 483

**TRANSCRIPTS:**

Taken 931

Not Taken 1738
**ACQUISITION TRAINING COORDINATORS (6/25/02)**

**[IC]{.underline} [LOCATION]{.underline} [PHONE NO.]{.underline}**

# CC

Stephanie Trice 10/1N226 6-7015

# CIT

Linda Myles 12A/3021 6-4648

# CSR

Edwin Echegoyen RKL2/3028 5-1087

# FIC

Sonya Thomas 31/B2C29 2-9046

NCCAM

William Tucker 31/5B58 4-1444

Lawrence Haller 6707 Democracy/106 301.402.9011

# NCI 1

Arlene Campbell EPS/608 5-3806

Kathleen Hargett EPS/604 5-3808

NCI2

Beth Mohan EPS/550 2-5411

# NEI

Darlene Lee 31/6A19 5-8833

# 

# NHGRI

Linda Jacobson 31/4B09 4-2643

# NHLBI

Carolyn Davis-Tate RKL II/6100 5-0330

NIA

Jessica Smith and 31/2CO2 6-5347

Celena Shirley Gateway/2C234 2-2716

# NIAAA

Sandy Reichard WILCO/504 3-1191

NIAID**1**

## Rachael Buffaloboy 6700-B Rockledge Drive 6-0612

> RM2230

# NIAID**2**

Debra Pitts 6700-B Rockledge Drive 2-2282 OR

MSC 7605, ROOM 1135 6-4500

# 

# NIAID**3**

## Susan Hanson 6700-B Rockledge Drive 6-2550

RM 2221, MSC 7616

# NIAMS

Eileen Webster-Cissel 45/5AS13A 4-2543

NICHD**2**

Pamela Carter 31/2A11 6-4121

# 

# NIDA

Maryann Postorino 6001/5128 3-4577

# 

# NIDA Baltimore

Sheila Zichos 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Room 1E14 410 558-8041

Baltimore, MD 21224

# NIDCD

Bernadette Wright 31/3C21 2-1132

NIDCR

Ginger Everhart 31/2C39 6-7744

# NIDDK1

Debbie Whittington 31/9A47 6-1202

NIDDK2

Marlene Mireles 2 Democracy Plaza, Suite 772 4-8831

# NIEHS 

# BONNIE PARKER P.O. BOX 12874 541-3315 RTP, NC 27709 

NIGMS

Esther Galloway 45/2AN-12 4-3833

# NIMH

Margo Cook 6001/8112 3-3836

# NINDS

Kirk Davis 6001/3287 6-1813

# NINR

William Rosano 31/5B13 2-5807

NLM

Debbie Rober 38A/B1N17 6-6546

# OD

Evadne Hammett 2/BE08, MSC 0215 594-8278

# OPM 

Bonnie Keane 6011/505F 2-3195

# ORS

Nancy Ludewig NSA/115F 2-1082

#
MESSAGE NO: 3282115 DATE: 10/8/1992

CATEGORY: ADA TYPE: LIQ

REFERENCE: REFERENCE DATE:

CASES: A-588-032

PERIOD COVERED: 10/21/1971 TO 08/31/1975

LIQ SUSPENSION DATE:

TO: REGIONAL DIRECTORS, COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS, DISTRICT DIRECTORS, AREA
AND PORT DIRECTORS

FROM: DIRECTOR, IMPORT SPECIALIST DIVISION

RE: LIQUIDATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR LARGE POWER TRANSFORMERS, FROM JAPAN

1\. THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NO LONGER AUTOMATICALLY CONDUCTS
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS OF ANTIDUMPING DUTIES FINDINGS\\ORDERS. INSTEAD,
REVIEWS MUST BE REQUESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 353.22 OF THE
COMMERCE REGULATIONS.

2\. THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE HAS NOT RECEIVED REQUESTS FOR AN
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW, FOR THE ANTIDUMPING DUTY FINDING\\ORDER FOR THE
PERIOD ON THE MERCHANDISE LISTED BELOW, EXCEPT FOR THE FIRM NOTED.
THEREFORE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 353.22(e) OF THE COMMERCE
REGULATIONS YOU ARE TO ASSESS ANTIDUMPING DUTIES ON THE MERCHANDISE
ENTERED, OR WITHDRAWN FROM WAREHOUSE, FOR CONSUMPTION DURING THE PERIODS
LISTED BELOW AT THE CASH DEPOSIT OR BONDING RATE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF
ENTRY.

LARGE POWER TRANSFORMERS FROM JAPAN PERIOD

A-588-032

LIQUIDATE ALL ENTRIES FOR ALL FIRMS 10\\21\\71-8\\31\\75 OTHER THAN
FUJI, HITACHI AND TOSHIBA

3\. THIS TELEX CONSTITUTES THE IMMEDIATE LIFTING OF SUSPENSION OF
LIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES FOR THE MERCHANDISE AND PERIODS LISTED ABOVE. YOU
SHALL CONTINUE TO COLLECT CASH DEPOSITS OF ESTIMATED ANTIDUMPING DUTIES
FOR THE MERCHANDISE AT THE CURRENT RATES.

4\. WHEVEVER THE USE OF THE ABOVE INSTRUCTIONS RESULTS IN THE ASSESSMENT
OF DUMPING DUTIES, YOU SHOULD REQUIRE OF THE IMPORTER PRIOR TO
LIQUIDATION THE REIMBURSEMENT STATEMENT DESCRIBED IN SECTION 353.26 OF
THE COMMERCE DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS. IF THE IMPORTER HAS BEEN REIMBURSED
ANTIDUMPING DUTIES OR FAILS TO RESPOND TO YOUR FORMAL REQUEST (VIA CF 28
OR 29) FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT STATEMENT PRIOR TO LIQUIDATION, CUSTOMS
SHOULD DOUBLE THE ANTIDUMPING DUTIES DUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ABOVE-REFERENCED REGULATION.

5\. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER BY CUSTOMS
OFFICERS, PLEASE CONTACT THE IMPORT SPECIALIST DIVISION, OTHER AGENCY
BRANCH VIA E-MAIL TO ATTRIBUTE HQ OAB. THE IMPORTING PUBLIC AND OTHER
INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD CONTACT SHEILA FORBES ON 202 482-8120, OFFICE
OF ANTIDUMPING COMPLIANCE, IMPORT ADMINISTRATION, INTERNATIONAL TRADE
ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.

6\. THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS ON RELEASE OF THIS INFORMATION.

NANCY MCTIERNAN
![](media/image1.wmf){width="5.602083333333334in"
height="3.872916666666667in"}

The diagram above represents the PPF specific replication data flow.
Note that updating IMPAC I (flow 8 on the generic diagram) is not
necessary for PPF as there is no centralized person profile concept in
IMPAC II (person information is only present in IMPAC I in conjunction
with a grant). The specific steps in a PPF replication are detailed
below:

1.  IMPAC I updates are applied to a profile by the forward bridge. As
    mentioned above, there is no concept of a centralized person profile
    in IMPAC I. However, grant specific person information received from
    IMPAC I is used by the forward bridge to maintain the centralized
    profile in IMPAC II. It is important to note that IMPAC I
    information will only be used to update a profile if that profile
    has not been processed by the Commons. Once a profile has been
    processed by the Commons, no IMPAC I updates will be applied. For
    this reason the flow is shown as a dashed line on this diagram.

2.  IMPAC II applications are free at all times to update the person
    profile information. These updates will be made by the Person
    System, a common module shared by all IMPAC II applications. It is
    important to note, however, that profile changes made by IMPAC II
    can be overwritten by the Commons as explained in flow 6 below.

3.  All updates to person information (by IMPAC II applications and the
    Commons) will be recorded in the person_audits_t table by database
    triggers on the person tables.

4.  The Commons will poll the person_audits_t table to detect changes to
    person information in IMPAC II. In addition to a periodic poll, the
    Commons will also check for changes immediately prior to allowing a
    user to update the profile.

5.  Upon detecting changes in IMPAC II, the Commons will copy the most
    recent person profile from IMPAC II to the Commons.

6.  After the Commons user has completed their changes, the *entire*
    profile (not just the updates) will be copied to IMPAC II using the
    replication functions. It is important to note here that from when
    the Commons user begins the update process to when they release the
    update to IMPAC II, the Commons will not process further IMPAC II
    changes recorded in the audit table. This means that, assuming the
    Commons user does not cancel their update, when the Commons update
    is applied to IMPAC II it will overwrite any updates which may have
    been made by IMPAC II while the update was in process in the
    Commons. For this reason the flow is bolded on this diagram. The
    expected duration of the update process in the Commons is limited to
    one user session.

7.  When a PPF submission is complete, the replication functions will
    generate a PPF submission text document which serves as an immutable
    version of the submission. In addition to generating this document,
    the replication functions will make a copy of the person profile
    received in an ERA role record.
#### Poster Presentation 3-20

**Characterization of Xylose Reductase Extracted by CTAB-reversed
Micelles from *Candida guilliermondii* Homogenate**

[Michele Vitolo]{.underline}\*, Adalberto Pessoa-Jr, Ely Vieira Cortez

University of São Paulo

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Dept. of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology

Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 580, B-16, 05508-900,

São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Phone: 55-11-30913862; Fax: 55-1138156386; E-mail: <michenzi@usp.br>

#### Maria das Graças de Almeida Felipe, Inês Conceição Roberto

Dept. of Biotechnology, FAENQUIL

Rod. Itajubá-Lorena, Km 74.5, 12600-000,

Lorena, SP, Brazil

Fax: 55-125533165

Xylosereductase (XR) (E.C.1.1.1.21), produced by *Candida
guilliermondii* grown in sugar cane bagasse hydrolysate, was separated
directly from the cell homogenate by reversed micelles of Cetyl
Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB), attaining a recovery yield of 100%
and enrichment factor of 5.6 fold. The extraction conditions were:
pH=7.0, electrical conductivity= 14mS/cm, T=5^o^C, 5% (w/w) of hexanol,
22% (w/w) of butanol and 0.15M CTAB. The XR after extraction was stable
in pH interval of 5.9-6.7 and its heat inactivation constant was about
6.5 fold higher than that before extraction. The V~max~ values against
both xylose and NADPH for XR before and after extraction by
reversed-micelles differed about 6%, whereas the difference on K~M~
values were more pronounced. The (K~M~)~xylose~ for XR after extraction
was about 35% higher than before extraction, meanwhile (K~M~)~NADPH~ was
about 30% lower after extraction than before one. As the K~M~ variations
indirectly signaled, the XR affinity simultaneously diminishes for
xylose and increases for NADPH. Thereby, this could probably explain why
the V~max~ values for XR before and after extraction were quite similar.
OLD SALEM VISIT/TOUR REGISTRATION

**Saturday**

**November 12**

**Depart from Village Hotel front lobby at 9:30 am**

Spouses and Family Members,

Wander the grounds on your own **visiting bakery, gift shops, and
restaurants** for **no fee**. For info on Old Salem visit
www.oldsalem.org/

**Ticket information Options:**

Paid tour (group of 14): **\$17** each -- visit each of 4 museums at
your own pace; a guide in each museum is included

Paid tour (group of 14): **\$11** each for The Museum of Early Southern
Decorative Arts (MESDA)

Paid tour (group of 14): **\$14** for two museums

Individual price (no tour): **\$21** for all day

We will eat **lunch** on your own at Old Salem -- your choice of
restaurant:

**Old Salem Tavern**: soups, salads, sandwiches, or entrees from \$3.50
to \$7.95

**Old Salem Corner Deli**: soups, salads, sandwiches from \$2.75 to
\$5.50

**Salem Soda Shop**: soups, sandwiches, subs, hot dogs, ice cream,
children's menu from \$2.50 to \$5.00.

***\*\*\*Return your registration for the group tour by October 25,
2005.***

***Money will be collected on Saturday Morning before departure.***

I will visit Old Salem and wish to be part of a tour **\$17.00**

I will visit Old Salem and wish to be part of MESDA tour **\$11.00**

I will visit Old Salem and wish to be part of 2 museum tour **\$14.00**

I will visit Old Salem and **DO NOT** wish to be part of a tour **no
charge**

I do not wish to visit Old Salem

RAIN OPTION: Vans will ferry us to Hanes Mall if weather is stormy. We
will eat lunch on our own at the Mall.

We will return to the hotel by 4:30 pm for the evening activities.

**\*\*\*RETURN THIS FORM TO NC WING HEADQUARTERS, P.O. Box 2082,
Burlington, NC 27216-2082**
JULY 3, 2001

CONSOLIDATION OF SATELLITE EARTH STATION FILES IN THE REFERENCE
INFORMATION CENTER

By this Public Notice, the Reference Information Center (RIC) informs
the general public of the consolidation of the Satellite Earth Station
(SES) files.

In the past, RIC required a request for these files to be submitted
using the SES file number associated with a particular application. With
the exception of Special Temporary Authority (STA) requests, RIC will
now require your request for Satellite Earth Station files to be
submitted using the assigned callsign.

Users can easily identify callsigns associated with SES filings by
accessing the International Bureau Application Filing and Reporting
System (IBFS) search tools. To find the search tool, users should go to
the IBFS homepage (HREF=\"http://www.fcc.gov/ibfs\") and click on the
button labeled "Search Tools". Users will then have several search
options, including a search by file number or a general query tool that
allows for searches by company name, type of application, date filed,
location of a station and other criteria. For more information or
technical assistance regarding IBFS, please contact the IBFS HelpLine at
202-418-2222. Callsigns will begin with the letters E, K or W.

We strongly encourage you to use IBFS for this and other International
Bureau information. For further information regarding this Public
Notice, contact Diane E. Murphy, CIB, Reference Information center at
(202) 418-1493 or via e-mail at HREF=\"mailto:dmurphy@fcc.gov\"
**DA 06-1652**

August 17, 2006

Jennifer M. McCarthy

Qualcomm, Inc.

5775 Morehouse Drive

San Diego, CA 92121

Re: Call Sign: E060311 File No. SES-LIC-20060810-01344

Call Sign: E060312 File No. SES-LIC-20060810-01346

Dear Ms. McCarthy:

On August 10, 2006, Qualcomm Inc. (Qualcomm) filed the above-captioned
applications for authority to operate two fixed earth stations that
would communicate with Permitted List satellites in the conventional
Ku-Band.[^1] Pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R. §25.112(a)(1), we dismiss both applications as defective.

Specifically, in both applications Qualcomm list the value of the
Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier for emission designator 11M0G7W as
40.67 dBW/4 kHz. This is less than and therefore inconsistent with the
average value of 45.71 dBW/4 kHz we derive from the bandwidth of the
emission and the Maximum EIRP per Carrier value of 80.1 dBW. Given this
inconsistency, we cannot determine the proposed emission power.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission's rules,
47 C.F.R. §25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission's rules on
delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. §0.261, we dismiss both applications
without prejudice to refiling.[^2]

Sincerely,

Scott A. Kotler

Chief, Systems Analysis Branch

Satellite Division

International Bureau

[^1]: 11.7-12.2 and 14.0-14.5 GHz bands.

[^2]: If Qualcomm refiles an application identical to the one dismissed,
    with the exception of supplying the corrected information, it need
    not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1109(d).
NY 865411

July 30, 1991

CLA-2-42:S:N:N3G:341 865411

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO: 4202.92.3030

Mr. Otto Pretsfelder

Arjon Mfg. Corporation

100 Hoffman Place

Hillside, New Jersey 07205

RE: The tariff classification of a tote bag from China.

Dear Mr. Pretsfelder:

In your letter dated July 19, 1991, you requested a tariff

classification ruling.

The submitted sample is a tote bag composed of man-made

textile material, measuring 14\" high and 16\" wide with two

handles and an open top. The bag is commonly known as a \"French

shopper.\"

The applicable subheading for the man-made textile tote bag

will be 4202.92.3030, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

States (HTS), which provides for travel, sports and similar bags,

with outer surface of textile materials, other, other, of man-

made fibers, other. The rate of duty will be 20 percent ad

valorem.

The tote bag falls within textile category designation 670.

Based upon international textile trade agreements, products of

China are subject to visa requirements and quota restraints.

The designated textile and apparel category may be

subdivided into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements

applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since

part categories are the result of international bilateral

agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations and

changes, to obtain the most current information

available, we suggest that you check, close to the time of

shipment, the

Status Report On Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an

internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available

for inspection at your local Customs office.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Section

177 of the Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry

documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the

documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be

brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the

transaction.

Sincerely,

Jean F. Maguire

Area Director

New York Seaport
# ![](media/image1.emf){width="1.2541666666666667in" height="1.1777777777777778in"}*Congressman Jim Marshall*

> *Representing the people of South and Middle Georgia*

**[EMBARGOED UNTIL 5:15 PM]{.underline}** Contact: Douglas Moore

October 15, 2003 (202) 225-6531

\(404\) 433-5561 cell

CONGRESSMAN JIM MARSHALL UNDERGOES SUCCESSFUL SURGERY

(Baltimore, MD) -- Earlier today, Congressman Jim Marshall (GA-3)
underwent a successful radical sub-abdominal prostatectomy at the Johns
Hopkins Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland, to remove a cancerous
tumor in his prostate.

"I am grateful and lucky that this cancer was found during the earliest
stages of its development. Because the cancer was identified, diagnosed
and treated so quickly, I am expected make a full recovery. The message
that I want to get across to people is get tested and get tested early.
The earlier a cancer such as mine is discovered, the better your chance
of recovery will be," said Marshall.

The procedure was conducted by Dr. Patrick Walsh, who also performed the
same operation on Sen. John Kerry earlier this year. Dr. Walsh, the
Chairman of the Urology Department of the Johns Hopkins Medical Center,
is perhaps the nation's foremost authority on prostate cancer, having
written two books on the subject as well as developing the
state-of-the-art procedure performed on Rep. Marshall. To date, Dr.
Walsh has performed this procedure more than 3,000 times.

"The operation could not have gone better. Everything looked contained,
and he is doing extremely well," said Dr. Walsh.
**\[DOE LETTERHEAD\]**

January 6, 2006

The Honorable A. J. Eggenberger

Chairman

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

625 Indiana Avenue, NW Suite 700

Washington, D.C. 20004-2941

Dear Mr. Chairman:

On November 10, 2004, the Department of Energy (DOE) provided the
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) with a schedule to
revise four DOE Technical Standards for High Efficiency Air Particulate
(HEPA) filters. The first of these standards, DOE-STD-3020-2005,
*Specification for HEPA Filters Used by DOE Contractors* (attached) has
been revised and issued. The Office of Quality Assurance Programs used a
team of HEPA filter technical experts to prepare the revised standard
which incorporates information from national consensus standards (e.g.,
ASME AG-1, *Code on Nuclear Air and Gas Treatment*) as well as
information gathered from various assessments. Additionally, the DNFSB
staff provided valuable input.

The remaining DOE Technical Standards for HEPA filters will be revised
per the schedule by December 2006. We will continue to actively involve
your staff in the directive revision process. Questions concerning this
commitment may be directed to me at (202) 586-1772 or Robert Loesch at
(301) 903-4443.

Sincerely,

***Frank E. Tooper***

***Deputy Assistant Secretary (Acting)***

***Office of Corporate Performance Assessment***

Attachment

***Note: Please call Frank Tooper at 202.586.1772 or Bob Loesch at
301.903.4443 for a copy of the attachment.***

cc: w/o attachments

John Spitaleri Shaw, EH-1

C. Russell Shearer, EH-1

Mark B. Whitaker, DR-1

Robert M. Loesch, EH-31

Subir K. Sen, EH-31
![](media/image1.wmf){width="1.3125in" height="0.5743055555555555in"}

**Stephen C. Garavito** Room 1131M1

General Attorney 295 North Maple Avenue

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

908-221-8100

FAX 908-630-3424

May 24, 2000

Ms. To-Quyen Truong

Associate Chief

Cable Services Bureau

Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street, SW

Washington, DC 20554

Re: In the Matter of Applications for Transfer of Control to AT&T Corp.
("AT&T") of Licenses and Authorizations Held by MediaOne Group, Inc.
[(MediaOne") CS Docket No. 99-251]{.underline}

Dear Ms. Truong:

This letter responds to the request by the Bureau staff for updated
information regarding AT&T's deployment of local telephone services
nationwide. AT&T currently provides residential local telephone service
to approximately 555,000 customers/lines nationwide using network
element combinations obtained from incumbent LECs ("UNE-P"), resold
local service, cable telephony, fixed wireless, and services provided
over AT&T facilities to multi-dwelling units ("MDUs").

AT&T provided local telephone service via UNE-P to 359,300 billed lines
as of May 1, 2000. It also provided resold local service to
approximately 125,000 lines as of December 31, 1999. As publicly
reported, AT&T provided local telephone service to 60,000 customers
nationwide via cable telephony as of May 19, 2000. More detailed
information is being provided separately to the Commission under
confidential seal pursuant to the protective order. Please call me if
you have any questions regarding this letter.

Sincerely,

cc: Royce Dickens

Linda Senecal
DRIVING DIRECTIONS TO

LOEWS L'ENFANT PLAZA HOTEL

**FROM THE NORTHEAST:**

Take 95 South to Route 50 West. Route 50 becomes New York Avenue. At
5^th^ Street, NW, bear right on L Street, NW (past police station) to
7^th^ Street, NW, and turn left. Continue to Independence Avenue and
turn right. Go to the 2^nd^ traffic light and turn left. The Hotel will
be at the top of the hill on the left.

**FROM THE SOUTH:**

Take 95 North to 395 North. Follow the sign for Route 1 North. Continue
to Independence Avenue (2^nd^ traffic light) and turn right. Go to the
2^nd^ traffic light and turn right. The Hotel will be at the top of the
hill on the left.

**FROM THE WEST:**

Take 66 East and follow the signs for Constitution Avenue. Follow
Constitution Avenue to 14^th^ Street, NW, and turn right. At the 3^rd^
light turn left (Independence Avenue). Go to the 2^nd^ traffic light and
turn right. The Hotel will be at the top of the hill on the left.

**FROM THE NORTHWEST:**

Take 270 South to 495 towards Virginia. Take the G.W. Parkway South to
395 North. Follow the sign for Route 1 North. Continue to Independence
Avenue (2^nd^ traffic light) and turn right. Go to the 2^nd^ traffic
light and turn right. The hotel will be at the top of the hill on the
left.
1001.1 Purpose

This chapter provides information about Bonneville Power
Administration's (BPA's) official Art Collection and guidance for
employees requesting displays of private artwork or collections.

1001.2 POLICY

**A. BPA Art Collection** was acquired to provide a stimulating work
environment, to advance an image of corporate excellence, and develop
employees' understanding and appreciation of art, creativity, and
cultural diversity within the arts and in the Federal workplace.

**B.** **In keeping with BPA diversity themes** and traditional
culturally focused celebrations, BPA also provides opportunities for
display of private collections, or significant memorabilia.

1001.3 RESPONSIBILITIES

**A. BPA's official Art Collection** is placed at Portland Headquarters,
Ross Complex and regional field sites. Items are generally
stationary---there is not rotation program. A request for a specific
relocation of an art piece must be submitted to Office Facilities, on
*Office Facilities Service Request Form 1400.04.*

**B. Employees seeking displays** of privately owned-art pieces for
public viewing in the workplace (such as culturally diverse art or
artifacts, or special commemorative décor) need to contact the HR
Diversity and EEO Manager (HRDE) for content review and clearance. Once
approved for placement, HRDE will coordinate logistics with Office
Facilities.

> Note: This chapter does not address display of art or decorations
> within an employee's personal workstation. See Workplace Services,
> Office Facilities' web site for Displays and Decorations, after
> January 2003.)

1001.4 RESPONSIBILITIES

**A. Office Facilities maintains** the inventory of BPA's official Art
Collection, and catalogues information regarding the history if each
piece.

**B. Office Facilities reviews** all requests for set-up and placement
of art, assesses space requirements, and then coordinates location,
placement and removal, as appropriate. Office Facilities collaborates
with HRDE for planning and placement of culturally specific displays

**C. Office Facilities also coordinates** placement of visuals for
business, art and cultural events for the Portland Headquarters
cafeteria bulleting board.

**D. Budget** for maintaining BPA's Art Collection resides in Office
Facilities**.**

**E.** **Budget** for developing culturally diverse art displays resides
in HRDE.
EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM VARIABILITY AND CHANGE ON LAKE EVAPORATION,
[K.D.Holman]{.underline}, J.D.Lenters\*, Lake Superior State University,
Department of Geology and Physics, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783,
<jlenters2@unl.edu>

Understanding lake evaporation, along with the basic fundamental driving
forces behind it, provides insight to a multitude of disciplines. Loss
of water from lake surfaces has important implications for water
resource management and lake ecology and, at the same time, is strongly
influenced by climate variability and change. However, because of the
significant resources required, accurate long-term evaporation studies
are not common. Accurate monitoring of lake evaporation requires
investments of time and resources to support instrumentation and
maintenance, as well as data processing. In this study, evaporation
rates are calculated for Sparkling Lake, a small lake located in
northern Wisconsin. The approach used is the energy budget method, which
requires the measurement of numerous meteorological and lake variables
at a floating monitoring site on the lake. Air temperature, relative
humidity, and incoming solar radiation are among the variables being
recorded at the lake site and a nearby weather station. The mean
evaporation rate for Sparkling Lake during the original 10-year analysis
is 3.1 mm day^-1^. Substantial variation has been found in the
evaporation rates on a wide range of timescales. The current research is
extending the evaporation analysis by 7 years, increasing our data
record by 70% and allowing a more in-depth investigation of long-term
variability and climate change. Since it is imperative to maintain a
high level of accuracy with such long-term studies, an intensive quality
control process was initiated this past summer at Trout Lake Research
Station (Boulder Junction, Wisconsin). Common techniques have been used
to identify and replace suspect data, while ensuring that only a minimal
amount of supplemental data is used. Results are presented from this
recent data analysis, including an assessment of the lake evaporation
rate, it's variability, and any long-term trends that have been
identified over the 17-year period.
June 8, 2006

SUBJECT: Unauthorized Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Programs on Government
Computers

TO: All Agency Employees

FROM: Melinda L. McClanahan /s/

Chief Information Officer

Number range CHAPTERThis memo is a reminder to all ARS Employees that
the use of P2P software is prohibited on all USDA equipment and
networks. In accordance with Office of Management and Budget Memo 04-06
on File Sharing Technology, "Federal computer systems or networks (as
well as those operated by Contractors on the government's behalf) must
not be used for the downloading of illegal and/or unauthorized
copyrighted content." USDA does not consider "Limited Personal Use
Policy" defined in DR 3300-1 or ARS P&P 253.4 as justification for
downloading P2P or other programs that perform those functions.

P2P is a protocol often used to obtain freeware, shareware, and bootleg
software. P2P exchange is made practical through web sites that act as
clearinghouses listing people who have or want something. Some P2P
applications allow computer users to directly access files from another
hard drive such as, music (mp3), movies, and documents. Other types of
P2P applications include gaming, telephony, and instant messaging.

The following list gives examples of some P2P software divided by
category.

**Instant Messaging /Telephony**

-   Yahoo Messenger • MSN Messenger

-   Windows Messenger • AOL Instant Messenger

-   Skype

All Agency Employees 2

**File Sharing**

-   Bit Torrent • Edonkey

-   Gnutelle • Morpheus

-   Kazaa • EMule

-   WinMX • Limewire

-   Napster • BearShare

-   PC Anywhere • Timbuktu

Number range CHAPTERInstant Messaging/Telephony allows users to chat via
text messaging in real time in addition to sharing files and initiating
telephone calls over the Internet. File Sharing and gaming allows users
to search each other's hard drives for specific files or information.

P2P file sharing can potentially compromise computer systems. The use of
this software creates vulnerabilities which can be exploited by
providing a means of introducing malicious code and other illegal
material into a Government network. In addition, the software can allow
inadvertent sharing of files by vulnerabilities or misconfiguration of
the software.

To enforce Department Manual 3525-002 "Internet Use & Copyright
Restrictions," USDA Cyber Security is monitoring all USDA networks for
P2P traffic. Upon detection of this traffic, the ARS, OCIO,
Cybersecurity Branch will be notified via the Incident Handling Process.

Having this software installed and/or running on Government equipment or
networks is prohibited and appropriate disciplinary action will be
taken. If you currently have this type of software installed on your
government equipment, it must be removed. Should you require assistance
to remove this software, please contact your local help desk.

If an exception to this policy is required, please prepare and send a
valid business need to include your immediate supervisor's approval and
signature and email your request to
<ARS-OCIO-Cybersecurity@ars.usda.gov>.
**(NM)(CA) The Post-doc/Recent Staff Seminar (PReSS):** Geoffrey L.
Brennecka (1816) presents on "Fabrication of Ultrathin Integrated
Multilayer Capacitors by Chemical Solution Deposition**"** and Youssef
Marzouk (8351) presents on "Uncertainty and Bayesian Inference in
Inverse Problems". PReSS is an informal seminar held once a month where
Post-docs or recently-hired staff present a research topic on which they
are working or have interest. PReSS is an informal and collegial
atmosphere for sharing research and ideas and is open to all. Through
attendance and participation, researchers across Sandia gain exposure,
learn about other work being performed at Sandia, share ideas, and
network. The seminar will be videoconferenced between NM (823/2279) and
CA (MO52/165) on Thursday 21, 2007 from 3:30--4:30 pm MST. CA foreign
nationals please email Sebastian Kaiser (sakaise@sandia.gov) so that
access to MO52, across from the CRF, can be arranged.

For more information about PReSS and other PDPDP sponsored events,
please visit <http://www.sandia.gov/pd2p/>.
VICE CHAIRMAN MULVEY, *concurring* in part and *dissenting* in part:

I concur with the majority in authorizing TTX's pooling of railroad car
services and the division of revenues derived therefrom with respect to
intermodal and autorack flatcars for an additional ten-year term. The
record before us amply demonstrates that the pooling of these types of
flatcars will be in the interest of better service to the public or of
economy of operation and will not unreasonably restrain competition.

I dissent with regard to the ten-year extension of pooling authority to
additional types of flatcars. In reviewing requests for pooling
authority, the Board follows the generally accepted principle that
grants of antitrust immunity are to be narrowly construed. Given that
standard, it does not appear to me that petitioners have sufficiently
demonstrated on this record that the pooling of specialized flatcars
will promote better service to the public or economy of operation, or
that it will not unreasonably restrain competition.

I understand that petitioners have been pooling this equipment for some
time, and I recognize that an order immediately denying authority could
be disruptive. Therefore, I would have extended immunity for specialized
flatcars, but for an interim period. This would have given the Board an
opportunity to re-examine the case for pooling specialized flatcars
before locking into a long-term authorization, and it would have
required the petitioners to present stronger evidence in support of the
benefits they allege.
![](media/image1.png){width="7.020833333333333in" height="0.40625in"}

**REMOVAL OF DIRECT DEPOSIT**

**[Removal of Direct Deposit Form]{.smallcaps}**

**Directions:**

This form must be completed to remove a casual's Direct Deposit and
replace it with a check mailing address. The form must be signed and
sent to the Casual Payment Center.

**Check One: BIA** **BLM** **FWS** **NPS**

**Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Date: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**SSN:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Please remove my Direct Deposit and send my payment to the mailing and
correspondence address below:**

**Current Address:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

> **\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

**Telephone Number:**
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

**Employing Agency:**
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

**Signature:**
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

If you have any questions, please call the Casual Payment Center at
1-877-471-2262.

***Information on this form is protected by the Privacy Act. Disclosure
may be made only to authorized persons according to Title 5 USC Section
552a and for used described in System of Records Notice
Interior/OS-85.***
\"Luebehusen, Chi Y.\" \<chi.luebehusen@ngc.com\>

03/27/2007 04:14 PM

To

Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc

\"Myers, Theresa B.\" \<theresa.myers@ngc.com\>, \"Keenan, Kip\"

\<kip.keenan@ngc.com\>

bcc

Subject

EPA Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0859 in Response to the RTR Phase II

ANPRM

Please find attached a Microsoft Excel file containing the revision to

emissions database for facility ID NEI7517, Northrop Grumman - BWI.

This facility is not a major source of HAP and is not an area source;

therefore, should be removed from the database.

Thank you!

\<\<0701Revisions_Luebehusen.xls\>\>

Chi Yon Luebehusen

Senior Environmental Engineer

Northrop Grumman Corporation

P.O. Box 1693 MS 980

Baltimore, MD 21203

Phone: 410-993-5774

Fax: 410-981-5237

Mobile 443-677-4226

email: chi.luebehusen@ngc.com
146.31

Compliance reviews.

\(a\) HUD may conduct pre-award reviews to determine whether programs

or activities submitted for HUD assistance are consistent with the age

distinctions set forth at Sec. 146.13(b).

\(b\) If a pre-award review indicates that the proposed programs or

activities are not consistent with the age distinctions set forth at

Sec. 146.13(b), the application will be returned to the applicant for

additional information or clarification or for correction consistent

with this part.

\(c\) HUD may conduct compliance reviews of recipients that will

enable it to investigate and correct violations of this part. HUD may

conduct these reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a

recipient. The review may be as comprehensive as necessary for HUD to

determine whether a violation has occurred.

\(d\) If a compliance review indicates a violation, HUD will attempt

to achieve voluntary compliance. If voluntary compliance cannot be

achieved, HUD may begin enforcement procedures as provided in

Sec. 146.39.
**FEMA-DR-1247-PR155Cs**

**22 de enero de 1999**

**CONTRA LA PARED: ¿ARMAZÓN DE MADERA O CEMENTO?**

**San Juan, P. R.** --- Una gran pregunta para cualquiera que vaya a
construir -- o reconstruir -- una vivienda es si construir las paredes
de madera o de cemento.

Muchas personas piensan que la construcción de armazón de madera es
menos resistente a los daños de un huracán. Los ejemplos más
sorprendentes de daños por una tormenta son sin duda las estructuras de
madera destruidas por el viento.

Sin embargo, mire a su alrededor. Muchas casas de madera del siglo 19
siguen en pie. La clave de su supervivencia es la manera en que éstas
fueron construidas: los constructores de antaño usaban construcciones de
vigas y columnas con pasadores de madera para sujetar las partes del
armazón así transfiriendo la fuerza de los vientos del techo, a través
de las vigas a los cimientos. Hoy, los "conectores" o las "amarras" para
huracán hechas de acero galvanizado de gran espesor ayudan a transferir
la fuerza de los vientos sobre el techo y las paredes a los cimientos.

La conexión de los componentes de la vivienda determinará cuánto
resistirá la vivienda los vientos huracanados. Una conexión entre los
elementos del armazón hecha sólo con clavos puede desprenderse por los
efectos de los vientos huracanados. Los clavos se hicieron para
mantenerse en su lugar ante las fuerzas perpendiculares a los mismos no
ante la fuerza de extracción. Contra la fuerza de extracción, se
necesitan tornillos. Usted puede clavar o atornillar los conectores de
huracán a los elementos del armazón. Se pueden usar clavos ya que la
tensión que se aplica a los conectores en una tormenta son
perpendiculares a los clavos que los sostienen.

Los conectores bien instalados en las vigas pueden aguantar las 1,000 a
2,000 libras de fuerza ascendente que cada extremo de la viga sufrirá en
un huracán. Si las planchas del techo están bien atornilladas a las
vigas, la fuerza ascendente se transmitirá por las paredes a los
cimientos.

Las paredes de concreto con varas de refuerzo de acero resisten los
vientos de fuerza huracanada. Pero cuestan mucho más que la construcción
de paredes de armazón de madera. Sin embargo, si se construyen
correctamente, las viviendas con armazón de madera pueden resistir la
fuerza de los vientos al igual que el cemento.

*Para más información, visite una ferretería local o una oficina
regional de la Administración de Reglamentos y Permisos (ARPE).*

\# \# \#
**Report No.** **2576** **September 17, 2002** **[CONSUMER &
GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS BUREAU]{.underline}**

### REFERENCE INFORMATION CENTER

**[PETITION FOR RULEMAKING FILED]{.underline}**

Interested persons may file statements opposing or supporting the
Petitions for Rulemaking listed herein within 30 days, or as noted. See
Sections 1.4 and 1.405 of the Commission\'s rules for further
information.

**\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--**

**RM NO. RULES SEC. PETITIONER DATE RECEIVED NATURE OF PETITION**

**\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--**

10564 Part 95 Industrial 08/22/02 Request Amendment of the Commissions

Telecommunications Rules to Prohibit Daily Business

Association Communications on Family Radio Services

(FRS) Frequencies.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

**FCC**
**EXHIBIT A TO SC LBR 2002-1**

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| IN RE:                            | CASE NO:                          |
|                                   |                                   |
| Debtor(s).                        | CHAPTER:                          |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   | NOTICE OF CASE SPECIFIC ADDRESS   |
|                                   | PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. \' 342(e)   |
|                                   | AND                               |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   | SC LBR 2002-1                     |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. \' 342(e) and SC LBR 2002-1, (*creditor*) files
this notice of address to be used to provide notice in the
above-captioned case. (*Creditor*) is aware that, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
\' 342(e)(2), any notice in such case required to be provided to such
creditor by the debtor or the Court will not be provided to the address
designated herein until after five (5) days following receipt of
(*creditor=s*) notice of address by the Court and the debtor.

Address to be changed (if applicable):

Name: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Address1:

Address2:

Address3:

Address4:

City, State, Zip

Address to be used for further noticing:

Name: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Address1:

Address2:

Address3:

Address4:

City, State, Zip

Authorization: Under penalty of perjury, I, the undersigned affirm that
I am authorized to request this address change.

Name:

Signature:

Date: