-------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------
  **ESEA: Smaller Learning   
  Communities (OESE)**       

  **FY 2008 Program          
  Performance Report (System 
  Print Out)**               

  Strategic Goal 2           

  Discretionary              

  ESEA, Title V, Part D-4    

  Document                   
  Year 2008 Appropriation:   
  \$80,108                   

  CFDA                       84.215L: FIE/Smaller Learning Communities
  -------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------

  -------------- --------------------------------------------------------
  **Program      **To assist high schools to create smaller learning
  Goal:**        communities that can prepare all students to achieve to
                 challenging standards and succeed in college and
                 careers.**

  -------------- --------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
  ***Objective 1 of 1:***   *Students in schools receiving smaller learning
                            communities implementation grants will demonstrate
                            continuous improvement in achievement in core subjects,
                            as well as exhibit positive behavioral changes.*

  ------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------

  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.1 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                             
  students scoring at or                                        
  above proficient on                                           
  state math assessments.                                       
  (Cohort FY04)   (Desired                                      
  direction: increase)                                          
    89a0x9                                                      

  **Year**                 **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                            (or date            
                                            expected)**         

  2005                     Set a Baseline   53.9                Target Met

  2006                     60               52.8                Did Not Meet Target

  2007                     62               (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                     64               (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                     66               (February 2010)     Pending
  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.  There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported
continuation awards only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.2 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                             
  students scoring at or                                        
  above proficient on                                           
  state math assessments.                                       
  (Cohort FY05)   (Desired                                      
  direction: increase)                                          
    89a0xa                                                      

  **Year**                 **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                            (or date            
                                            expected)**         

  2006                     Set a Baseline   45.5                Target Met

  2007                     60               (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                     62               (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                     64               (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                     66               (February 2011)     Pending
  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation. There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported
continuation awards only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.3 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                             
  students scoring at or                                        
  above proficient on                                           
  state math assessments.                                       
  (Cohort FY06)   (Desired                                      
  direction: increase)                                          
    89a0xb                                                      

  **Year**                 **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                            (or date            
                                            expected)**         

  2007                     Set a Baseline   45.5                Target Met

  2008                     60               (September 2009)    Pending

  2009                     62               (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                     64               (February 2011)     Pending

  2011                     66               (February 2012)     Pending
  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.4 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                             
  students scoring at or                                        
  above proficient on                                           
  state reading                                                 
  assessments. (Cohort                                          
  FY04)   (Desired                                              
  direction: increase)                                          
    89a0xi                                                      

  **Year**                 **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                            (or date            
                                            expected)**         

  2005                     Set a Baseline   59.8                Target Met

  2006                     60               59.2                Did Not Meet Target

  2007                     62               (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                     64               (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                     66               (February 2010)     Pending
  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ---------------------------
  **Measure 1.5 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                             
  students scoring at or                                        
  above proficient on                                           
  state reading                                                 
  assessments. (Cohort                                          
  FY05)   (Desired                                              
  direction: increase)                                          
    89a0xj                                                      

  **Year**                 **Target**        **Actual\          **Status**
                                             (or date           
                                             expected)**        

  2006                     Set a Baseline    43.4               Target Met

  2007                     60                (February 2008)    Pending

  2008                     62                (February 2009)    Pending

  2009                     64                (February 2010)    Pending

  2010                     66                (February 2011)    Pending
  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ---------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.6 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                             
  students scoring at or                                        
  above proficient on                                           
  state reading                                                 
  assessments. (Cohort                                          
  FY06)   (Desired                                              
  direction: increase)                                          
    89a0xk                                                      

  **Year**                 **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                            (or date            
                                            expected)**         

  2007                     Set a Baseline   43.4                Target Met

  2008                     60               (September 2009)    Pending

  2009                     62               (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                     64               (February 2011)     Pending

  2011                     66               (February 2012)     Pending
  ------------------------ ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------
  **Measure 1.7 of 18:**                                         
  The percentage of                                              
  students in high schools                                       
  receiving Smaller                                              
  Learning Communities                                           
  grants who graduate from                                       
  high school (based on                                          
  9th grade enrollment).                                         
  (Cohort FY04)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0xl                                                       

  **Year**                 **Target**        **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2005                     Set a Baseline    84.7                Target Met

  2006                     87                84.7                Did Not Meet Target

  2007                     88                (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                     89                (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                     90                (February 2010)     Pending
  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------
  **Measure 1.8 of 18:**                                         
  The percentage of                                              
  students in high schools                                       
  receiving Smaller                                              
  Learning Communities                                           
  grants who graduate from                                       
  high school (based on                                          
  9th grade enrollment).                                         
  (Cohort FY05)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0xm                                                       

  **Year**                 **Target**        **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2006                     Set a Baseline    80.4                Target Met

  2007                     87                (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                     88                (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                     89                (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                     90                (February 2011)     Pending
  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------
  **Measure 1.9 of 18:**                                         
  The percentage of                                              
  students in high schools                                       
  receiving Smaller                                              
  Learning Communities                                           
  grants who graduate from                                       
  high school (based on                                          
  9th grade enrollment).                                         
  (Cohort FY06)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0xn                                                       

  **Year**                 **Target**        **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2007                     Set a Baseline    80.4                Target Met

  2008                     87                (September 2009)    Pending

  2009                     88                (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                     89                (February 2011)     Pending

  2011                     90                (February 2012)     Pending
  ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.10 of 18:**                                        
  The percentage of                                              
  graduates in schools                                           
  receiving Smaller                                              
  Learning Communities                                           
  grants who enroll in                                           
  postsecondary education,                                       
  apprenticeships, or                                            
  advanced training for the                                      
  semester following                                             
  graduation. (Cohort FY04)                                      
    (Desired direction:                                          
  increase)   89a0xr                                             

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2005                      Set a Baseline   82.2                Target Met

  2006                      83               83.7                Target Exceeded

  2007                      84               (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                      85               (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                      86               (February 2010)     Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------
  **Measure 1.11 of 18:**                                         
  The percentage of                                               
  graduates in schools                                            
  receiving Smaller                                               
  Learning Communities                                            
  grants who enroll in                                            
  postsecondary education,                                        
  apprenticeships, or                                             
  advanced training for the                                       
  semester following                                              
  graduation. (Cohort FY05)                                       
    (Desired direction:                                           
  increase)   89a0xs                                              

  **Year**                  **Target**        **Actual\           **Status**
                                              (or date            
                                              expected)**         

  2006                      Set a Baseline    80.3                Target Met

  2007                      83                (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                      84                (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                      85                (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                      86                (February 2011)     Pending
  ------------------------- ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------
  **Measure 1.12 of 18:**                                         
  The percentage of                                               
  graduates in schools                                            
  receiving Smaller                                               
  Learning Communities                                            
  grants who enroll in                                            
  postsecondary education,                                        
  apprenticeships, or                                             
  advanced training for the                                       
  semester following                                              
  graduation. (Cohort FY06)                                       
    (Desired direction:                                           
  increase)   89a0xt                                              

  **Year**                  **Target**        **Actual\           **Status**
                                              (or date            
                                              expected)**         

  2007                      Set a Baseline    80.3                Target Met

  2008                      83                (September 2009)    Pending

  2009                      84                (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                      85                (February 2011)     Pending

  2011                      86                (February 2012)     Pending
  ------------------------- ----------------- ------------------- -------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------------------
  **Measure 1.13 of 18:**                                       
  Cost (in dollars) per                                         
  student demonstrating                                         
  proficiency or advanced                                       
  skills in reading.                                            
  (Cohort FY04)   (Desired                                      
  direction: decrease)                                          
    89a0xv                                                      

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\          **Status**
                                             (or date           
                                             expected)**        

  2005                      Set a Baseline   435                Target Met

  2006                      425              442                Target Exceeded

  2007                      415              (September 2008)   Pending

  2008                      405              (February 2009)    Pending

  2009                      395              (February 2010)    Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.14 of 18:**                                        
  Cost (in dollars) per                                          
  student demonstrating                                          
  proficiency or advanced                                        
  skills in reading.                                             
  (Cohort FY05)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0xw                                                       

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2006                      Set a Baseline   559                 Target Met

  2007                      550              (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                      540              (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                      530              (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                      520              (February 2011)     Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.15 of 18:**                                        
  Cost (in dollars) per                                          
  student demonstrating                                          
  proficiency or advanced                                        
  skills in reading.                                             
  (Cohort FY06)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0xx                                                       

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2007                      Set a Baseline   559                 Target Met

  2008                      550              (September 2009)    Pending

  2009                      540              (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                      530              (February 2011)     Pending

  2011                      520              (February 2012)     Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.16 of 18:**                                        
  Cost (in dollars) per                                          
  student demonstrating                                          
  proficiency or advanced                                        
  skills in mathematics.                                         
  (Cohort FY04)   (Desired                                       
  direction: decrease)                                           
    89a0xy                                                       

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2005                      Set a Baseline   483                 Target Met

  2006                      475              506                 Did Not Meet Target

  2007                      465              (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                      455              (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                      446              (February 2010)     Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.17 of 18:**                                        
  Cost (in dollars) per                                          
  student demonstrating                                          
  proficiency or advanced                                        
  skills in mathematics.                                         
  (Cohort FY05)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0xz                                                       

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2006                      Set a Baseline   546                 Target Met

  2007                      540              (September 2008)    Pending

  2008                      530              (February 2009)     Pending

  2009                      520              (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                      510              (February 2011)     Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.

  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------
  **Measure 1.18 of 18:**                                        
  Cost (in dollars) per                                          
  student demonstrating                                          
  proficiency or advanced                                        
  skills in mathematics.                                         
  (Cohort FY06)   (Desired                                       
  direction: increase)                                           
    89a0y0                                                       

  **Year**                  **Target**       **Actual\           **Status**
                                             (or date            
                                             expected)**         

  2007                      Set a Baseline   546                 Target Met

  2008                      540              (September 2009)    Pending

  2009                      530              (February 2010)     Pending

  2010                      520              (February 2011)     Pending

  2011                      510              (February 2012)     Pending
  ------------------------- ---------------- ------------------- --------------------------

**Frequency of Data Collection**. Annual

**Explanation**. Cohort years are identified by the funding year. For
example, the FY06 cohort received grants in FY07 from the FY06
appropriation.\
\
There is no FY08 cohort since FY08 funds supported continuation awards
only.\
\
The FY03 cohort received three-year awards. All cohorts after that year
received five-year awards.