BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
**Subject:** Mobile Presentation (Gov Docs, BI, and You) Web Sites

As promised in Mobile, here are the web sites that I used in my
presentation\--Kirsten

Search Engines:

Google Uncle Sam (<http://www.google.com/unclesam>)\
Altavista---Advanced Search
(<http://www.altavista.com/sites/search/webadv>)\
Hotbot---Advanced Search (<http://hotbot.lycos.com/>)\
FirstGov (<http://firstgov.gov/>)

Library Catalogs with Depository Libraries:\
\
PALS (<http://www.csbsju.edu/library/books/palscat.html>)\
MnLINK (<http://www.mnlink.org/>)

Large Depository Library Sites:

University of Colorado at Boulder
(<http://www-libraries.colorado.edu/ps/gov/us/federal.htm>)\
University of Michigan Documents Center
(<http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/fedelec.html>)\
University of Idaho (<http://db.lib.uidaho.edu/govdocs/index.php3>)\
University of Memphis (<http://exlibris.memphis.edu/govpubs/mig.htm>)

Federal Agencies

Federal Agencies on the Web
(<http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/locators/agency/index.html>)\
US Government Manual (<http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/nara001.html>)\
Code of Federal Regulations
(<http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html>)\
Federal Register
(<http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/aces140.html>)\
Statistical Abstract
(<http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-us.html>)\
American Factfinder
(<http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/BasicFactsServlet>)\
Univeristy of Michigan Documents Center
(<http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/stats.html>)

Congress

GPO Access (<http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/index.html>)\
Congressional Universe (Subscription service)
(<http://web.lexis-nexis.com/congcomp/>)

===========

Kirsten Clark\
Government Documents/\
Electronic Services Librarian\
St. John\'s University\
Alcuin Library\
Box 2500\
Collegeville, MN 56321-2500\
phone: (320)363-2601\
fax: (320) 363-2126
Paragraph Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE, BACKGROUND AND AUTHORITIES

1-1. Purpose 1-1

1-2. Background 1-1

1-3. Authorities 1-1

CHAPTER 2. DEFINITIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

2-1. Definitions 2-1

2-2. Responsibilities 2-1

CHAPTER 3. IDENTIFYING VITAL RECORDS

3-1. Relationship of Vital Records to Essential Emergency

Functions 3-1

3-2. HUD\'s Essential Emergency Functions 3-1

3-3. Recommending Vital Records 3-2

3-4. Screening Agency Records 3-2

3-5. Guarding Against Overly Elaborate Vital Records Program 3-3

3-6. HUD Headquarters Issuances and Forms are Already

Being Stored 3-3

3-7. Previously Identified Vital Records 3-3

APPENDIXES

1\. ANNUAL REPORT ON VITAL RECORDS Form and Instructions

2\. Suggested format of Assistant Secretary for Administration (or

Regional Administrator) Memorandum Initiating Annual Report

on Vital Records

3\. Suggested format of Memorandum from Vital Records Reporting

Organization Heads Requesting Data from Subordinate Units

i

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
**Guidelines for Evaluating the Presence of Information on DEPARTMENT
NAME Publicly Available Website that Can Reveal Direct, Corroborative,
Inferential, or Conglomerate Information of Use to Terrorists (Ver.3**)

> The following types of information on publicly accessible Department
> websites should be considered for immediate removal:

-   Information that specifies or implies DEPARTMENT NAME physical or
    logical vulnerability,

-   Plans, maps, diagrams, aerial photographs, architectural plans of
    DEPARTMENT NAME properties,

-   Information technology architecture plans (e.g., IP address ranges,
    server names or naming conventions), data telecommunications access
    numbers, network details/maps,

-   Information that specifies or implies DEPARTMENT NAME emergency
    deployments, including DEPARTMENT NAME emergency personnel movements
    and emergency stockpiles,

-   Personal data, (e.g., SSNs, Dates of Birth, demographic details, bio
    material), including material that could be used as a social
    engineering \"handle\",

-   Information about DEPARTMENT NAME staff family members,

-   Telephone numbers, e-mail addresses, e-mail links other than those
    required by staff to fulfill a specific DEPARTMENT NAME point of
    contact for CUSTOMER IDENTITY and other mission related customers,

-   Organizational charts that document or imply personal information or
    critical infrastructure protection duty status,

-   General listings of DEPARTMENT NAME staff that are not required to
    fulfill specific mission-related requirements,

-   Schedules of DEPARTMENT NAME officials or their exact locations on
    the premises or off,

-   Information on the composition, preparation, or optimal use of
    hazardous materials/toxins, including DEPARTMENT NAME medical
    research activities and results,

-   Details on emergency response procedures, evacuation routes, or
    officials responsible for these issues within an agency (e.g.,
    potential Anthrax bearing mail procedures, Emergency Preparedness
    Directives),

-   Disaster recovery plans,

-   \"Lessons Learned\" (other than general guidelines) in past disaster
    recovery exercises/drills/events, Incident Reports,

-   Travel booking information.

-   Social engineering is the process of using human skills to glean
    security-related information. A \"handle\" is information that the
    \"engineer\" could use to imitate familiarity with the \"mark\",
    like a wife\'s name.
## NCWM Incident/Accident Report

(To be completed & submitted unsigned, anonymously)

*The purpose of this form is accident prevention. Please incorporate
this report into your safety program documentation procedures.
Completing this brief report will allow NCWM to alert other
organizations and jurisdictions of hazards and possible corrective
actions.*

1\. What weights & measures function was the employee performing, where,
and when?

2\. Briefly describe the incident.

3\. Contributing factors (check all that are appropriate):

( ) inexperience ( ) weather conditions ( ) improper equipment

( ) lack of training ( ) equipment failure ( ) lack of protective gear

( ) employee error ( ) failure to follow procedures ( ) hazardous
materials

( ) insufficient personnel ( ) job fatigue ( ) unsafe work surface

( ) haste ( ) environmental conditions ( ) housekeeping

( ) other

Comments

4\. Recommendations for corrective action:

Continue your comments on the (Page 2) or back of this sheet

Please send to Ken Butcher, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive Stop 2350,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2350 (telephone: 301-975-3991) (FAX 301-926-0647)

**Continuation of Comments on Numbered Items**

1\.

**2.**

**3.**

**4.**

Miscellaneous remarks:
![](media/image1.png){width="2.5in" height="1.4in"}

**331 Newman Springs Road**

**Red Bank, NJ 07701-5699**

**Date:** October 28, 1999 **From: Robert W. Lucky**

**Room NVC-3Z367A**

**(732)758-2100**

**rlucky@telcordia.com**

**Jules A. Bellisio**

**Room NVC-3Z331**

**(732)758-2959**

**jules@research.telcordia.com**

**Subject:** FCC Technological Advisory Council Second Meeting Report

**To:** Members of FCC TAC

Attached is the Report: Second Meeting of the FCC Technological Advisory
Council. The meeting was videotaped and that tape serves as the official
minutes. This report, prepared as a document to aid in the work of TAC,
contains an encapsulated version of the meeting and is being posted on
the public web site. Comments and improvements are always welcome. You
may wish to join one or more focus groups if you have not already done
so. Please check your own personal information so that errors may be
corrected on an ongoing basis. If you have not already provided us with
secondary contact information (e.g., your secretary), please do so.

# 

# Robert W. Lucky

# Chairman

# FCC TAC

# 

# Jules A. Bellisio

# Executive Director

# FCC TAC

## Att.

Report: Second Meeting of the FCC Technological Advisory Council
DETECTION AND MONITORING

EQUIPMENT

### INJECT TO HAZMAT CONTROLLER FOR INSTRUMENT READINGS.

**Combination Meters (4-Gas Meter)**

O2 Level = 21%

##  LEL = No alarm

##  UEL = No alarm

CO = O

**M-8**---Paper turns yellow when exposed to GB agent

• Will not detect chemical agents in gas or vapor form.

• M-8 paper will give false positive response when exposed to hydraulic
oil and some decontaminants.

**M-9**---A red, red-brown or pink color will appear for all detectable
agents.

• Chemically treated, dye-impregnated paper with an adhesive backing.
Used as a point detector, it delineates the presence of liquid nerve
agents by color changes to the paper but cannot differentiate between
agents.

• M-9 paper will give a false positive response when exposed to diesel
oil, hydraulic fluids and some decontaminants.

**Colorimetric Tubes**---Draeger's Chemical Warfare Agent Detection
Tubes

• Phosphoric Acid Esters 0.05/a (0.05 ppm or 0.5mg/m3). At step 5, if
change to red is sustained for longer than 1 minute, it indicates GB
group from Set B.

**Pesticide Tickets**---Detects organophosphates and carbamate
pesticides. Fail safe--if test fails, the ticket remains white and will
keep you on the safe side, thinking there may be contamination until
proven otherwise.

Blue change = no agent.

White = contamination.

Range of detection 0.1-10 ppm.

**Photoionization Detector (PID)**---Use 10.6 eV or 11.7 eV ultraviolet
lamp to ionize chemicals with an ionization potential (IP) below 10.6 eV
to measure their concentration in parts per million (ppm) with a CF
(correction factor) of about 10/2 for GB in gas/vapor form.

**M-256A1**---Use the Star test spot (15 minutes). Used primarily for
monitoring because the reaction time of its contents is too slow to
allow for effective warning capability.

-   Once ampule is activated Star test spot will turn from white to blue

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   If GB present Star test spot will turn to a peach color

• Sensitivity: 0.02 mg/m3

# M-18A2---Utilize blue band tube, test takes 1-3 minutes. Used to confirm the results of the M-256.

• Tube will turn yellow if positive for GB.

**ICAM APD**---(Improved Chemical Agent Monitor -- Advanced Portable
Detector)

• Sensitivity: V -- 0.04 mg/m3 \< 30 seconds

##  • High concentration of this agent \< 10 seconds

• Temperature: Operation: -30°C to +52°C

• Alarms: Easy to read visual display and two audio alarms: warning and
test

**M-21 RSCAAL**---(Remote Sensing Chemical Agent Alarm) Automatic,
scanning, passive infrared sensor used to detect nerve (GB) based on
changes in infrared energy from remote objects or sky cloud caused by a
chemical agent.

**M-8A1---**Alarm system that can automatically detect nerve agents (GB)
in vapor concen­trations only. When a nerve agent is detected at a remote
location, a warning light and horn sound.
**DA 05-1266**

**WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU NORTH AMERICAN NUMBERING COUNCIL**

**ANNOUNCEMENTS**

**(CC Docket Nos. 92-237 and 99-200)**

> **Released Date: April 28, 2005**

The Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) has appointed Regina Brown,
staff attorney, Telecommunication Access Policy Division (TAPD), to
serve as the Designated Federal Officer (DFO) to the Federal
Communications Commission's federal advisory committee, the North
American Numbering Council (NANC). Ms. Brown replaces Sanford Williams,
staff attorney, TAPD, who served as the DFO from May 2002 through May
2005.

The Bureau also announces the appointment of Marilyn Jones, staff
attorney, TAPD, as the Alternate DFO (ADFO). Ms. Jones replaces Pam
Slipakoff, staff attorney, TAPD, who served as the ADFO from May 2002
through May 2005.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:** Deborah Blue, Special Assistant to
the Designated Federal Officer at (202) 418-1466 or via the Internet at
[deborah.blue@fcc.gov](mailto:dblue@fcc.gov)[.]{.underline} The address
is: Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12^th^ Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
**PUBLIC NOTICE**![](media/image1.png){width="0.7388888888888889in"
height="0.7458333333333333in"}

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** News Media Information: (202)
418-0500

**445 12th STREET, S.W.** Fax-On-Demand: (202) 418-2830

# WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 Internet: [http://www.fcc.gov](http://www.fcc.gov/)

# ftp.fcc.gov

**DA 01-1546**

**July 11, 2001**

**AUCTION OF LICENSES FOR 747-762 AND 777-792 MHz** **BANDS (AUCTION No.
31) IS POSTPONED**

**Report No. AUC-01-31-B (Auction No. 31)**

The auction of licenses in the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz bands (Auction
No. 31), previously scheduled to begin on September 12, 2001, will be
delayed pending Commission resolution of petitions for reconsideration
and clarification of the Commission's Third Report and Order in WT
Docket No. 99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120, and MM Docket No. 00-39.[^1]
Upon release of the Commission's order acting on those petitions for
reconsideration, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau will release a
public notice announcing key dates for Auction No. 31.

Action by Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau

For further information, contact Howard Davenport or William Huber,
Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Legal Branch at (202) 418-0660.

**- FCC -**

[^1]: Service Rules for the 746-764 and 776-794 MHz Bands, and Revisions
    to Part 27 of the Commission's Rules; Carriage of the Transmissions
    of Digital Television Broadcast Stations; Review of the Commission's
    Rules Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, WT Docket No.
    99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120, MM Docket No. 00-39, *Third Report and
    Order*, 16 FCC Rcd 2703 (2001). Shortly after receiving petitions
    for reconsideration and clarification of this decision, the Wireless
    Telecommunications Bureau established a pleading cycle with respect
    to those filings. *See* Pleading Cycle Established for Responses to
    Petitions For Reconsideration of the Third Report and Order in WT
    Docket No. 99-168, CS Docket No. 98-120, and MM Docket No. 00-39,
    *Public Notice*, DA 01-788 (March 29, 2001). That *Public Notice*
    also identifies the parties that filed petitions, and provides
    instructions for obtaining copies of those filings.
# IDENTIFICATION AND COVER SHEET

April 18, 2005

Submission to the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform

A proposal to make the annual \$1000 child tax credit fully refundable.

An individual submission by:

Al Sheahen

PO Box 2204

Van Nuys CA 91404

Phone: 818-981-1996

Fax: 818-981-1997

Email: <alsheahen@prodigy.net>

## A Proposal to Make the Child Tax Credit Fully Refundable

By Al Sheahen

*This proposal would make the current \$1000 child tax credit fully
"refundable."*

Under current law, the annual \$1000 child tax credit is too complex.
Some of the credit is "refundable." Much of it is not. Even tax
preparers are confused by the law's complexity.

For example:

1)  Mary, 26, is a single mom with a 2-year-old child. She takes care of
    her child at home. She earned no income in 2004. She receives no
    child tax credit because she earned less than \$10,750 in 2004.

2)  Jane, 26, is a single mom with a 2-year-old child. She worked
    part-time and earned \$7000 in 2004. She receives no child tax
    credit because she earned less than \$10,750 in 2004.

3)  Ruth, 26, is a single mom with a 2-year-old child. She worked
    full-time at about \$7.00 an hour and earned \$14,000 in 2004. She
    receives a partial child tax credit of \$325 (from Form 8812).

4)  Debbie, 26, is a single mom with a 2-year-old child. She worked
    full-time at more than \$11 an hour and earned \$24,000 in 2004. She
    receives the full child tax credit of \$1000.

In other words, parents who need the child tax credit the most don't get
it.

Here's how it looks, with the Earned Income Tax Credit figured in:

Mary Jane Ruth Debbie

Earned income 0 7000 14000 24000

Tax 0 0 65 1084

Child tax credit 0 0 65 1000

Tax 0 0 0 84

Earned income tax credit 0 2372 2604 1017

"Additional child tax credit" 0 0 325 0

Net tax (refund) 0 (2372) (2929) (933)

Total Income 0 9372 16929 24933

This is incredibly complex and unfair to Mary, who earned nothing and,
thus, gets nothing. She receives no child tax credit or earned income
tax credit, even though she clearly needs help.

Making the child tax credit fully refundable would give \$1000 to both
Mary and Jane, and would give an additional \$675 to Ruth. It would
simplify a very confusing section of the tax code.

Al Sheahen is the author of *Guaranteed Income: The Right to Economic
Security* and works in the VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance)
program in Los Angeles.
Preservation Note 32

Mortar and Sealant: Where to Use Which

Masonry

June-95

Masonry Mortar-04060

Joint Sealers-07900

Mortar Sealant: Where to Use Which

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

National Park Service (NPS) Technical Preservation Services Division
guidance on the use of sealants versus mortar on historic masonry
follows. NPS-TPS is the office, which creates the standards for Federal
Agencies to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act. All
projects involving exterior masonry work at Historic properties must
follow this guideline to assure successful compliance review.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

For parapets: NPS Policy on Sealants

Use sealants only on exposed parapets where unusual environmental
conditioned preclude maintaining the historic mortar joint.

Examples of conditions that merit substituting mortar with sealant:

Driving rain, continually washes out mortar

Provide weep holes.

Point underside of coping stones to permit moisture transmission (See
Detail 1).

Parapet is subject to severe thermal expansion and contraction (Walking
Parapet)

Seal vertical cracks/open joints at 8-foot intervals.

Point intervening joints (See Detail 2).

Coping joints are very narrow and building movement is causing stone
units to rub against each other. Here, sealant is used on upper exposed
layer of joint only (with mortar beneath), to provide a cushion for
stone units.

Litmus test for substituting mortar with sealant:

There must be a documented problem (infiltration) that could not BE
solved by normal maintenance.

Desire to avoid maintenance is not an acceptable reason for switching to
sealant. Sealant generally requires renewal more often than mortar.
Improper use of sealant can lead to moisture entrapment in stone units.
Trapped moisture freezes within the stone, causing spalling.

Guidance for installing sealant in mortar joints:

Apply sealant on horizontal surface and VERTICAL nosing of coping only.

Point coping return (underside) with mortar to allow moisture to escape.
**\[DOE LETTERHEAD\]**

January 14, 2004

The Honorable John T. Conway

Chairman

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

625 Indiana Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20004-2941

Dear Mr. Chairman:

The National Nuclear Security Administration and the Office of
Environmental Management have issued the attached memoranda to their
site offices requesting review and implementation of the recently
revised Nuclear *Air Cleaning Handbook* (DOE-HDBK-1169-2003). These
memoranda are a deliverable as part of the Department's Implementation
Plan in response to Board Recommendation 2000-2, *Configuration
Management, Vital Safety Systems*. This completes the Department's
actions to fulfill commitment 25 of the 2000-2 Implementation Plan.

If you have questions in this regard, please call me at (301) 903-0124.

Sincerely,

***Edward B. Blackwood***

***Director***

***Office of Regulatory Liaison***

[Attachments](../tb04j14a.pdf)

cc: Beverly A. Cook, EH-1

Mark B. Whitaker, DR- 1
Legal Opinion: GMP-0129

Index: 7.340, 7.433

Subject: FOIA Appeal: Section 236 Project

November 12, 1992

Ms. Secky Fascione

HERE

208 E. Main St.

Missoula, Montana 59802

Dear Ms. Fascione:

This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act

(FOIA) appeal dated September 16, 1992. You appeal the

August 17, 1992 partial denial by Ron Bailey, Director, Office

of Housing, Denver Regional Office. Mr. Bailey withheld the

following business information of the Hearthstone Apartments,

Proj. No. 093-44060, a Section 236 elderly project, under

Exemption 4 of the FOIA: (1) financial reports for 1989-1991;

\(2\) material pertaining to rent or food increases for 1989-91;

and (3) the current 1992 operating budget.

I have determined to affirm the initial denial under

Exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. Section 552(b)(4) and the Trade

Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 1905.

The information in the financial reports, operating budgets,

and other material is detailed commercial and financial

information on the operation of the business which was properly

withheld from you pursuant to Exemption 4 of the FOIA.

Exemption 4 exempts from mandatory disclosure \"trade secrets and

commercial or financial information obtained from a person and

privileged or confidential.\"

Since the withheld documents contain confidential commercial

and financial information, discretionary release is further

prohibited by the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 1905. The

Trade Secrets Act makes it a criminal offense for any employee of

the United States, or one of its agencies, to release trade

secrets and certain other forms of confidential commercial or

financial information except when disclosure is authorized by

law. The statute classifies as confidential commercial or

financial information, the \"amount or source of any income,

profits, losses, or expenditures of any person, firm,

partnership, corporation or association.\"

Judicial review of my action on this appeal is available to

you in the United States District Court for the judicial district

in which you reside or have your principal place of business, or

in the District of Columbia, or in the judicial district where

the records you seek are located.

Very sincerely yours,

George L. Weidenfeller

Deputy General Counsel (Operations)

cc: Yvette Magruder

Michal Stover, 8G
[Statistical analysis of the representativeness of the watersheds
selected for monitoring:]{.underline} The Atrazine Ecological Monitoring
Program identified 1172 watersheds that were in the upper 80th
percentile of potential vulnerability to atrazine runoff, and selected a
representative pool of 40 subwatersheds for monitoring. EPA has asked
the Panel to consider the appropriateness of identification of the pool
of potentially vulnerable watersheds and selection of the representative
monitored subwatersheds (Charge Question \# 6). The enclosed document
statically assesses the characteristics of the watersheds (WARP scores,
atrazine use, and other characteristics that render a watershed
vulnerable to potential atrazine runoff), and concludes that the sample
size of 40 is representative of the 1,172 most vulnerable watersheds.
**Janet Knobel USDA Rural Development** (402) 223-3125

**David R. Taladay, Southeast Nebraska Development District** (402)
475-2560

**15 COUNTIES GAIN ASSISTANCE TO PROMOTE**

**SOUTHEAST NEBRASKA ASSETS**

**\--USDA Rural Development & Southeast Nebraska Development District
Assist**

**Lincoln, Neb., June 30, 2005---**The United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development presented the Southeast Nebraska
Development District (SENDD) with a \$24,625 symbolic check today in
USDA's State Office. Funds will assist in providing economic development
planning and technical assistance to a 15 county area in southeast
Nebraska. Project is expected to create and/or retain 15 jobs over a
1-year period. Leveraged funds totaling \$4,925 of in-kind assistance
will be contributed.

"The [information highway]{.underline} may be passing by communities in
southeast Nebraska. We believe this project will help some of them get
into that fast lane by sharing information [on-line]{.underline},"
stated Dave Taladay, programs manager for Southeast Nebraska Development
District.

Funds will assist SENDD in bringing businesses and communities online
through the Location One Information System (LOIS) and the Nebraska
Economic Development Information (NEDI) system. The two systems will
market assets, available sites and buildings for southeast Nebraska
businesses and communities and expand business opportunities, creating
quality jobs.

"USDA Rural Development is committed to keeping Nebraska's rural
communities strong and viable," stated Scot Blehm, state director for
USDA Rural Development. "Today's funding to Southeast Nebraska
Development District will help to make known, the great assets this part
of the state possesses. Impacted communities' infrastructure will be
expanded, making southeast Nebraska an even more enticing place to live
and work."

Counties to be served are Cass, Fillmore, Gage, Jefferson, Johnson,
Nemaha, Otoe, Pawnee, Polk, Richardson, Saline, Saunders, Seward, Thayer
and York.

The USDA grant was provided through the USDA Rural Development Rural
Business Enterprise Grant program. Leveraged in-kind contributions were
received from other service providers in the SouthEast Resource Network
(SERN), including OPPD, NPPD, and AQUILA. For additional information
contact Janet Knobel, janet.knobel@ne.usda.gov, 201 N. 25 Street
Beatrice, Neb. 68310 or phone (402) 223-3125, (402) 437-5093 (TDY).
Visit http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/ne/.

\#

USDA Rural Development is an Equal Opportunity Lender, Provider and
Employer. Complaints of discrimination should be sent to USDA, Director,
OCR, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410.
Joint Meeting of the

# CDER Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee &

######### **FDA Pediatric Advisory Committee**

## September 13-14, 2004

# CONSULTANTS AND GUESTS

# 

# *Special Government Employee (SGE) Consultants (voting)*

Norman Fost, M.D., M.P.H.

Professor of Pediatrics and Bioethics

University of Wisconsin Medical School

600 Highland Avenue

Madison, Wisconsin 53792

Charles E. Irwin, Jr., M.D.

Pediatrics/ Adolescent Medicine

University of California, San Francisco: Laurel

3333 California Street, Suite 245

San Francisco, California 94143-0503

Laurel K. Leslie, M.D., F.A.A.P.

Pediatrician/Research Scientist

Child & Adolescent Services Research Center

C/o Children's Hospital

3020 Children's Way, MC5033

San Diego, California 92123

Steven Ebert, Pharm. D. (Consumer Representative)

Department of Pharmacy

Meriter Hospital

202 South Park Street

Madison, Wisconsin 53715

James M. Perrin, M.D.

Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy

50 Staniford Street, Suite 901

Massachusetts General Hospital for Children

Boston, Massachusetts 02114

Cynthia R. Pfeffer, M.D.

Professor of Psychiatry

Weill Medical of Cornell University

New York Presbyterian Hospital

21 Blooming Dale Road

White Plains, New York 10605

***SGE Patient Representative (voting)***

Gail W. Griffith, Washington, D.C.

***Guest Speakers (non-voting)***

Kelly Posner, Ph.D.

Department of Child Psychiatry

New York State Psychiatric Institute

1051 Riverside Drive

New York, New York 10032

John March, M.D., M.P.H.

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

Duke Child & Family Study Center

718 Rutherford Street, Room 132

Durham, North Carolina 27710

***Guests (non-voting)***

Samuel Maldonado, M.D., M.P.H.

(Industry Representative)

920 Route 202 South

Raritan, New Jersey 08869

Barbara Stanley, Ph.D

Department of Child Psychiatry

New York State Psychiatric Institute

1051 Riverside Drive

New York, New York 10032

Madelyn Gould, Ph.D., M.P.H.

Department of Child Psychiatry

New York State Psychiatric Institute

1051 Riverside Drive

New York, New York 10032

***FDA Participants at the Table (non-voting)***

Robert Temple, M.D.

Director, Office of Drug Evaluation I, CDER

Russell G. Katz, M.D.

Director

Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products, CDER

Thomas Laughren, M.D.

Team Leader

Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products, CDER

M. Dianne Murphy, M.D.

Director, Office of Pediatric Therapeutics,

Office of the Commissioner

Anne Trontell, M.D., M.P.H.

Deputy Director, Office of Drug Safety, CDER
PUBLIC NOTICE![](media/image1.png){width="0.6541666666666667in"
height="0.6604166666666667in"}

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12^th^ STREET, S.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 **DA 00-2059**

News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 TTY
202/418-0484 202/418-0485 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov

**Released: September 8, 2000**

## 

## AMERITECH FILES PRICING FLEXIBILITY PETITION AND REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL

# CCB/CPD FILE NO. 00-22

On September 6, 2000, the Ameritech Operating Companies (Ameritech)[^1]
filed a petition for pricing flexibility for dedicated transport and
special access services pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774. On September 7, 2000, Ameritech filed a
request to withdraw and/or dismiss without prejudice its petition for
pricing flexibility filed on September 6, 2000. No pleading cycle has
been established for Ameritech's pricing flexibility petition.

For further information, contact Joi Roberson Nolen, Competitive Pricing
Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-1520.

**- FCC -**

[^1]: The Ameritech Operating Companies are Illinois Bell Telephone
    Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Michigan Bell Telephone
    Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, and Wisconsin Bell, Inc.
Task Order Request:

Response Due Date: 4/17/2008

Task Description: 

1)  Electronic transfer of funds to the INFANT Foundation in support of
    innate immunity in viral respiratory disease research being
    conducted in Buenos Aires. 

2)  A paper check to Johns Hopkins University in support of the INFANT
    Foundation work being conducted in Baltimore, MD. 

All funds are to be received by April 28, 2008.

**The electronic transfer instructions:  (Amount \$180,000)**

Credit:  Northern Trust

40 Broad Street, 10^th^ Floor, NY

Swift:  CNORUS33

ABA 026001122

Further Credit:  Merrill Lynch

Account# 106369-20010

Final Credit:  Account# 168-04117

N/O FUNDACION INFANT

For further information regarding electronic transfer, contact Sara Sidi
at <sara_sidi@ml.com>

**The paper check instructions:  (Amount \$37,500)**

Mail to the attention of:  Becky Proctor

Johns Hopkins University

HLCHB

Suite 2114

200 North Wolfe Street

Baltimore, MD  21205

Telephone:  410-955-5038

On the check stub please include:  "Salary Supplement for Dr. Fernando
Polack"
[BlackBerry Handheld Device -- Draft Statement of Need]{.underline}

[Requirements]{.underline}:

A.  [Airtime Fee]{.underline} (*includes any associated Activation
    fee(s))*

-   Mandatory "Month-to-Month" airtime charges ([not]{.underline}
    yearly)

-   Device must be shipped deactivated unless specified otherwise.

-   Must provide Airtime services for ALL BlackBerry models (ie.,957,
    5810, 6510, 6710) *[note]{.underline}: specific models do have
    constraints.*

-   Activation and deactivation of voice and/or data services within 4
    business hours.

-   Standard Fee set for ALL BlackBerry device activations and
    deactivations.

# Blackberry Handheld Devices

-   Vehicle to purchase BlackBerry Models 957, 5810, 6510, 6710 unless
    specified otherwise.

-   Vehicle to purchase BlackBerry Accessories compatible with emerging
    technologies (ie., cradle, charger, holster, keyboard, etc.)

-   Management of RMA devices (ex. defective hardware return, etc.)

# BlackBerry Licensing

-   Vehicle to purchase BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) Server
    License(s)

-   Vehicle to purchase Blackberry Client License(s)

-   Management of existing BlackBerry (BES) server and client licenses.

# BlackBerry Technical Support

-   RIM T3 support billed on a monthly basis.

-   Provide Annual RIM T-3 Support -- 24/7 access providing telephone,
    email and fax support; 5 named callers; T-Electronic support
    including knowledge base, priority queuing of support issues, FAQs,
    technical documentation, software downloads and upgrades.

# Billing/Asset Management

-   Purchase Orders (PO) will be awarded for each Census Bureau
    Division.

-   A spreadsheet listing the pin number (957s only), and a spreadsheet
    listing the simm number/phone number with the associated PO numbers
    will be forwarded to the awarded vendor. This spreadsheet is to be
    used as an aid to the vendor in creating their monthly invoices.

-   An invoice per PO will be issued to Finance Division, Room 3546,
    Washington, DC 20233-4400. Each invoice must contain a unique
    invoice number, the PO number and the period of performance.

-   Electronic billing in the form of an excel spreadsheet should be
    provided for both active and inactive devices.

-   A monthly spreadsheet should be provided by the vendor containing
    the following:

> Activation date
>
> Deactivation date
>
> Reactivation date
>
> Warranty expiration date
>
> Pin number (957s only)
>
> Simm number and phone number (5810, 6510, 6710s)
>
> Purchase Order number for the device
>
> Purchase Order number for the license (and any add'l add-on licenses)
>
> Purchase Order number for the airtime
To Lenders, Guaranty Agencies, and Other FFEL Program Participants

From: Susan Szabo, Chief Business Operations Officer

Business Operations

Federal Student Aid

Re: Access to NSLDS -- Update #1

Date: April 20, 2007

On April 18, 2007, we announced that access to information in the
National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) by certain program
participants was suspended until we determine if there was unauthorized
use of NSLDS and until we consider options for providing NSLDS access to
those entities. As we noted in the April 18 announcement, the suspension
of access to NSLDS did not apply to postsecondary educational
institutions or to individual students/borrowers. As was expected, we
have received requests for clarification of this suspension of NSLDS
access. Therefore, this update, which is likely to be the first of a
number of updates, addresses issues that have come to our attention
since we posted the April 18 announcement.

Batch Processes -- Our suspension of access to NSLDS impacts the ability
of an affected program participant to access the 'NSLDS Financial Aid
Professional' website. With one exception, all program participants
continue to be able to send and receive data and to update NSLDS using
any of the NSLDS batch processes. The one exception is that, for the
time being, we disabled the guaranty agency financial aid transcript
batch process where agencies can request privacy protected information
for a group of borrowers.

Sharing of PINs -- We want to remind all participants, including those
in the FFEL Program and institutions, that they may [never]{.underline}
request that a student/borrower release his or her Federal Student Aid
PIN for any reason. In addition, program participants may not use a
student/borrower's PIN even if provided unsolicited. The PIN is part of
the person's electronic signature that is used for signing documents and
accessing privacy protected information and, as such, may never be used
by someone other than the person to whom the PIN was assigned.

Consolidation Loan Processing -- We are aware that because lenders often
use NSLDS to confirm the loan information provided by a borrower on a
consolidation loan application, processing of consolidation loans may be
delayed due to the suspension. However, the importance of protecting all
borrowers' private financial information is our primary concern. As
noted in the earlier announcement, we are working to restore access
where appropriate and with additional safeguards as quickly as possible.

Problem Solving -- We know that the suspension of NSLDS access may limit
the ability of an affected program participant to assist borrowers and
institutions in the resolution of data conflicts between NSLDS and other
data sources. As noted above, we will work to restore access where
appropriate and with additional safeguards as soon as possible.
Poster Presentation 2-10

Microarray-Analysis of Xylose-Growing Recombinant *Saccharomyces
cerevisiae* Strains

[Marie Jeppsson]{.underline}^1\*^, Christer Larsson^1^, Fredrik
Wahlbom^2^, Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal^1^,

Marie F. Gorwa-Grauslund^1^

^1^Applied Microbiology, Lund University

P.O. Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

Phone: 46 46 222 83 28; Fax: 46 46 222 42 03; E-mail:
[**Marie.Jeppsson@tmb.lth.se**](mailto:Marie.Jeppsson@tmb.lth.se)

^2^ Novozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, 2880 Bagsværd, Denmark

*Saccharomyces cerevisiae* can efficiently convert the hexoses present
in lignocellulosic hydrolysates to fuel ethanol. To enhance the ethanol
yield from this raw material efficient recombinant *S. cerevisiae*
strains capable of xylose utilisation need to be constructed.

Introduction of the *Pichia stipitis* genes encoding xylose reductase
and xylitol dehydrogenase, as well as overexpression of endogeneous
xylulokinase, results in a stable xylose-fermenting *S. cerevisiae*
strain (Eliasson *et al*. 2000). However even aerobically this strain
grows very slowly on xylose.

Strains with improved aerobic xylose growth have been generated through
adaptation or mutation. To pinpoint variations that can be responsible
for the enhanced growth on xylose, microarray-analysis has been
performed on strains fermented in continuous mode. Results from this
investigation will be presented.

Eliasson, A., C. Christensson, C. F. Wahlbom and B. Hahn-Hägerdal.
(2000). Anaerobic xylose fermentation by recombinant *Saccharomyces
cerevisiae* carrying *XYL1, XYL2*, and *XKS1* in mineral medium
chemostat cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(8): 3381-6
**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE\
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE\
IDAHO**

**operation and maintenance REQUIREMENTS\
subsurface drainage\
code 606**

Landowner/Operator

Job Location

County SWCD Farm/Tract No.

Referral No. Prepared By Date

# Operation and Maintenance Items 

A properly operated and maintained subsurface drainage system is an
asset to the farm. This drainage system was designed and installed to
remove excess subsurface water with a system of buried conduits. The
estimated life span of this installation is at least 10 years. The life
of this system can be assured and usually increased by developing and
carrying out a good operation and maintenance program.

This practice will require performance of periodic maintenance and also
require operational items to maintain satisfactory performance. A good
operation and maintenance program includes:

-   Maintain the design depth of cover. All settlement or cracks in the
    soil should be investigated to determine the cause and immediately
    repaired.

-   Avoid travel by heavy equipment over drainlines when the soil is
    saturated except at designed crossings. Avoid travel over pipelines
    by tillage equipment when the soil is saturated. Limit traffic to
    sections that were designed for traffic loads.

-   Avoid any subsoiling operation that may disturb the drain or its
    filter and/or envelope materials.

-   Remove all foreign debris that hinders system operation.

-   Immediately remove any obstructions or blockage of, trash racks,
    drain inlets or drain outlets.

-   Maintain all outlets, rodent guards, inlets and access man-holes in
    good operating condition.

-   Eradicate or otherwise remove all rodents and/or burrowing animals
    that have or can potentially damage any part of the system.
    Immediately repair any damage caused by their activity.

-   Immediately repair any vandalism, vehicular or livestock damage to
    any outlets and appurtenances.

Special operation and maintenance requirements
96M03/29/06

S209-96M.doc

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Use on all projects with culverts.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Section 209. - STRUCTURE EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL**

**Construction Requirements**

**209.09 Bedding.**

**(b) Culverts.** [Delete the third sentence and substitute the
following:]{.underline}

When no class is specified, use bedding material that conforms to class
C and to Table 2 of AASHTO M 145 for Classifications A-1, A-2, or A-3
soils.

[Add the following:]{.underline}

If lean concrete backfill is used, the bedding requirements for (2)
Class B and (3) Class C are waived.

Where installing plastic pipe, use Class B.

**(c) Pre-Cast and Cast In Place Concrete Box Culverts.** Construct
bedding according to 209.09(a). Use Class B bedding.

**209.10 Backfill.**

**(b) Culvert.** [Delete the first sentence and substitute the
following:]{.underline}

Where installing plastic pipe, use backfill material conforming to the
requirements of Class B bedding.

[Add the following:]{.underline}

As an alternative to backfill material, the Contractor may use lean
concrete backfill for backfill of pipe culverts. When utilizing lean
concrete backfill, furnish materials and perform the work according to
Section 614. Do not use lean concrete backfill with aluminum or
aluminum-coated structures or plastic culverts.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Use on 4R projects that have **concrete** retaining walls.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**209.12 Acceptance.** [Add the following:]{.underline}

Structural excavation (walls) work will be evaluated under Subsections
106.02 and 106.04.

**Measurement and Payment**

**209.13** [Add the following]{.underline}:

Do not measure structural excavation (walls) for payment.
**§20.1001 Rule 1001. Filing and disposition of motion for
reconsideration.**

\(a\) *Application* *requirements*. A motion for Reconsideration must be
in writing and must include the name of the veteran; the name of the
claimant or appellant if other than the veteran (e.g., a veteran's
survivor, a guardian, or a fiduciary appointed to receive VA benefits on
an individual's behalf); the applicable Department of Veterans Affairs
file number; and the date of the Board of Veterans' Appeals decision, or
decisions, to be reconsidered. It must also set forth clearly and
specifically the alleged obvious error, or errors, of fact or law in the
applicable decision, or decisions, of the Board or other appropriate
basis for requesting Reconsideration. If the applicable Board of
Veterans' Appeals decision, or decisions, involved more than one issue
on appeal, the motion for reconsideration must identify the specific
issue, or issues, to which the motion pertains. Issues not so identified
will not be considered in the disposition of the motion.

\(b\) *Filing of motion for reconsideration*. A motion for
reconsideration of a prior Board of Veterans' Appeals decision may be
filed at any time. Such motions must be filed at the following address:
Director, Management and Administration (01E), Board of Veterans'
Appeals, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

\(c\) *Disposition*. The Chairman will review the sufficiency of the
allegations set forth in the motion and, depending upon the decision
reached, proceed as follows:

\(1\) *Motion denied*. The appellant and representative or other
appropriate party will be notified if the motion is denied. The
notification will include reasons why the allegations are found
insufficient. This constitutes final disposition of the motion.

\(2\) *Motion allowed*. If the motion is allowed, the appellant and his
or her representative, if any, will be notified. The appellant and the
representative will be given a period of 60 days from the date of
mailing of the letter of notification to present additional arguments or
evidence. The date of mailing of the letter of notification will be
presumed to be the same as the date of the letter of notification. The
Chairman will assign a Reconsideration panel in accordance with §19.11
of this chapter. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 7103, 7108)

\[57 FR 4109, Feb. 3, 1992, as amended at 67 FR 16023, Apr. 4, 2002\]
**Nanoscale Magnetic Particles:**

**Fundamental Magnetization Behavior and Interaction Effects**

Jens Mueller

*Florida State University*

Elongated magnetic nanoparticles attract continuing attention because of
potential technological applications such as high-density information
storage as well as because magnetic nanowires provide a unique testing
system for theoretical models. Iron particles of 5 -- 20 nm in diameter
and generally 80 -- 250 nm in height may be grown by STM assisted CVD,
an advantageous technique for exact positioning of individual Fe
particles on different substrate materials. The particle's magnetization
reversal is studied using gated Hall magnetometer devices made from
GaAs/AlGaAs 2DEG heterostructures. Detailed studies of the low-frequency
1/f noise enabled the optimization of the device performance to a moment
sensitivity of better than 10^4^ μ~B~ which allows for single particle
measurements. The investigation of such particles is not only driven by
the quest for a more detailed picture of the magnetization behavior of
the particles themselves but ultimately to apply these small and local
magnetic flux sources to intentionally influence and investigate other
materials. A first step in this direction is to study heterostructures
of magnetic particles and an underlying magnetic film. In such
structures, an enhanced interaction between the particles, as well as
interactions between the particles and the magnetic film is observed. We
also find that the transport properties of the magnetic film are highly
sensitive to the actual magnetization state of a particle array grown on
top.
V. Armaments

Section V details the number and type of armaments possessed by
personnel at the main Antarctic stations and on research vessels.

# McMurdo Station

-   1 rifle, dart, \"CAP-CHUR\" powder projector (#350)

-   1 barrel and grip, for Savage .22 long over/20-gauge under

-   8 pistols, pyrotechnic (5 ea 25 mm) (2 ea 12-gauge)

# Palmer Station

-   2 pistols, 38-caliber, Smith and Wesson \[SN: 2D09672; SN: 2D06268\]

-   1 shotgun, 12-gauge, Magnum, pump action, Remington \[SN: S346543M\]

-   1 shotgun, 12-gauge, double barrel, Centrure Liege \[SN: 6633\]

-   1 shotgun, 12-gauge, over and under, Fabrica Haliana \[SN: 77978\]

-   1 mini ranch rifle, 223-calibre, Ruger \[SN: 188-32652\]

1.  SN = Serial Number

# South Pole Station

One pistol, pyrotechnic.

# R/V NATHANIEL B. PALMER

No armaments are currently onboard the R/V NATHANIEL B. PALMER.

# R/V LAURENCE M. GOULD

No armaments are currently onboard the R/V LAURENCE M. GOULD.