# Conservation Planning and Application {#conservation-planning-and-application .eHead-Part .unnumbered}

# PART 409 ‑ Conservation Planning Policy {#part-409-conservation-planning-policy .eHead-Sub-Part}

# (Oregon Amendment 9 in Red) {#oregon-amendment-9-in-red .eHead-Sub-Part}

# 409.0 General. {#general. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) This document establishes Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) policy for providing conservation planning assistance to clients.
The Director of the Conservation Operations Division (COD) has the
functional oversight for this policy. As part of this oversight, the
Director of COD will establish a tracking and quality assurance system
to assess the progress of states in implementing conservation planner
training, certification and maintenance programs.

\(a\) This supplement establishes Oregon Natural Resources Conservation
Service (OR-NRCS) conservation planning and planner certification
policy.

\(b\) State Conservationists may supplement this policy, as needed, to
provide specific guidance and to comply with State, tribal and local
laws and regulations. A copy of each State supplement will be sent to
the appropriate Regional Conservationist (RC) and Director, COD.

\(c\) The [National Planning Procedures Handbook
(NPPH)](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/NPPH/H_180_600.doc) provides
procedures and guidance on implementing this planning policy, including
relationships to the [Field Office Technical Guide
(FOTG)](http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/efotg/), electronic storage
of data, technical handbooks, and program guidance in the planning
process. The NRCS planning process and standards as outlined in the NPPH
will be used for all conservation planning.

\(d\) In cases where NRCS is assisting, or is assisted by other agencies
or groups, NRCS planning procedures and plan format may be modified to
meet those specific client needs.

# 409.1 Conservation Planning Objective. {#conservation-planning-objective. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) The objective in conservation planning is to help each client
attain sustainable use and sound management of soil, water, air, plant,
and animal resources. The purpose is to prevent the degradation of
resources and to ensure their sustained use and productivity, while
considering the client's economic and social needs.

\(1\) The NRCS conservation planning process emphasizes development of
resource management systems (RMS). An RMS is a combination of
conservation practices and resource management activities for the
treatment of all identified resource concerns for soil, water, air,
plants, animals, and humans that meets or exceeds the quality criteria
in the FOTG for resource sustainability.

\(2\) The minimum level of treatment to strive for in the planning
process is the RMS. Progressive planning is used to work toward an RMS
when a client is ready, willing, and able to make some, but not all of
the decisions necessary to achieve an RMS level of management.

\(3\) It is desirable to write a conservation plan for an entire
agricultural operation. If a landowner is not interested in developing a
plan for an entire agricultural operation, develop a plan for a single
Conservation Management Unit (CMU) as defined in the National Planning
Procedures Handbook. If any planned action associated with the
conservation plan has the potential to have a controversial or adverse
impact on adjacent lands then the conservation plan must also address
and mitigate the adverse impacts.

\(b\) When programs or initiatives exist, for example, Highly Erodible
Land provisions, that define other levels of planning for specific
resource issues, clients will be offered alternatives that, as a
minimum, meet the criteria of those programs. However, the conservation
planner will encourage the client, who is a participant in programs that
are related to specific resource issues, to develop an RMS plan or
progressive plan as appropriate. This will help the client identify and
address all resource concerns and provide a plan to use with other
existing or future programs.

\(b\) In all conservation plans the planner will provide the client with
at least two alternatives. One alternative must meet an RMS level of
management, and one must meet, at a minimum, the quality criteria for
soil quality and water quality resource concerns.

\(c\) Resource management objectives of NRCS' clients are addressed
through the development of individual conservation plans, areawide
conservation assessments, and areawide conservation plans. Clients
develop plans and assessments with conservation planning assistance from
NRCS, conservation districts, Resource Conservation and Development
Councils, and other appropriate sources. NRCS conservation planning
assistance is based on ecological, economic, and social considerations
relative to the resources. When NRCS provides conservation planning
assistance, on-site visits with clients are an integral part of that
assistance.

\(d\) Conservation plans are the basis for all assistance NRCS provides
to clients and the basic tool for them to manage their natural
resources. The conservation plan, however, is just one product of the
planning process. The greatest value comes by having the client engaged
in every step of the planning process. The client develops an
understanding of the natural resource issues, interactions and
treatments necessary for resource sustainability.

# 409.2 Conservation Planning Assistance Delivery. {#conservation-planning-assistance-delivery. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) All citizens will have equal access to NRCS programs. Assistance
provided will be in compliance with all Civil Right Acts,
Non-discrimination statutes, and regulations of the Secretary of
Agriculture.

\(b\) NRCS traditionally provides conservation planning assistance on a
request basis.

\(1\) Assistance is given on individual land units through conservation
districts and tribal districts based on a mutual agreement and a
cooperative working agreement. The mutual agreement establishes a
partnership and a foundation for USDA agencies to cooperate with States,
units of government, tribal governments, conservation districts, and
tribal districts.

\(2\) The cooperative working agreement supplements the mutual agreement
and establishes the relationship between the partners and agencies of
USDA, and between State conservation agencies or tribal governments and
conservation districts or tribal districts.

\(3\) NRCS may enter into agreements with other organizations and units
of government to provide conservation planning assistance as mutually
agreed upon. The State Conservationist will determine the level of NRCS
assistance to be provided in areas without conservation districts. NRCS
will provide assistance for programs mandated by Congress independent of
a cooperative working agreement with the conservation district.

\(c\) NRCS has a "Trust" responsibility to deliver service to American
Indian tribes through a government to government relationship. Law,
policy, and other directives require government to government
responsibilities.

\(1\) Executive memos direct Federal agencies to remove procedural
impediments to working effectively with tribal governments in the
delivery of programs and services, and to develop the best mechanism for
delivering programs and services to tribes through the consultative
process.

\(2\) A tribe may determine that a conservation district is not wanted
or needed and that another mechanism fits their situation better.

\(3\) The State Conservationist will consult with federally recognized
tribes to determine the optimum means of delivering NRCS programs and
services.

\(3\) Consultation with Oregon tribes occurs at every OR-NRCS
organizational level. OR-NRCS tribal liaisons work closely with Oregon's
federally recognized tribes to ensure optimal delivery of NRCS programs
and services on a regular basis. OR-NRCS has stationed permanent
employees on the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian
Reservation and on the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation to provide full time technical assistance.

\(4\) Every effort will be made to fulfill NRCS' government to
government responsibilities.

\(d\) In providing assistance, NRCS will comply with all applicable
Federal, State, and local laws, program rules, policy statements,
executive orders, and international agreements.

\(d\) When providing assistance to individual landowners Oregon NRCS
planners will document compliance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA),
Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA),
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and
other applicable federal, state and local laws on the OR-EVT1 form.

\(e\) Areawide conservation planning, especially for those situations
with complex objectives, requires the use of interdisciplinary teams of
specialists in the planning effort.

\(f\) In complex situations, NRCS will employ an early scoping process
to determine expected needs for NRCS services and other resources before
committing to planning assistance.

\(g\) Assistance on Federal or State land that will require a
significant amount of NRCS resources beyond the required scoping process
completed early in the planning process, will be based on an agreement
that provides for reimbursement of NRCS services. The State
Conservationist will determine when an agreement is required.

\(g\) Assistance provided by NRCS on federal or state land will require
a working agreement that specifies work arrangements, technical
services, and reimbursements.

# 409.3 Requirements for Providing Conservation Planning Assistance. {#requirements-for-providing-conservation-planning-assistance. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) All NRCS conservation planners will be certified. The COD will
establish minimum criteria to be met by NRCS employees to be a
"certified conservation planner" ([See GM-180, Part
409.9](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.)).

\(1\) A certified conservation planner is a person who possesses the
necessary skills, training, and experience to implement the NRCS
nine-step planning process to meet client objectives in solving natural
resource problems.

\(2\) The certified conservation planner has demonstrated skill in
assisting clients to identify resource problems, to express the client's
objectives, to propose feasible solutions to resource problems, and
leads the client to choose and implement an effective alternative that
treats resource concerns and meets client's objectives.

(3) State Conservationists may establish additional certification levels
    and criteria as needed to cover degrees of scope and complexity in
    planning environments.

\(3\) The Oregon's supplement to the nationally established minimum
criteria for NRCS employees and others to be certified conservation
planners in Oregon can be found in Section
[OR409.9](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.).
OR-NRCS recognizes three levels of conservation planner certification:

[(i) Basic Planner -]{.underline} OR-NRCS grants [Basic Planner
status]{.underline} to those who satisfactorily complete the OR-NRCS
Conservation Planning Course and demonstrate their skill in using
applicable site assessment tools. Basic level planners assist clients
develop conservation management system alternatives that solve natural
resource problems while meeting the client objectives.

[(ii) Journey Planner -]{.underline} OR-NRCS grants [Journey Planner
status]{.underline} to those who successfully perform at the Basic level
and demonstrate a broad knowledge of natural resource conservation and
related sciences including agronomy, forestry, range, hydrology,
biology, and engineering systems. Journey level planners provide
conservation planning guidance and training to others.

\(iii\) [Master Planner -]{.underline} OR-NRCS grants [Master Planner
status]{.underline} to those who successfully perform at the Journey
level and demonstrate their ability to train others and their knowledge
of the area-wide conservation planning process. Master planners
participate in conservation planning recertification and quality
assurance reviews and exemplify the spirit of a conservation planning
leader by consistently following policy and procedures.

\(b\) All plans developed with the assistance of NRCS and partner
employees will be approved by an NRCS or partner certified conservation
planner. When a conservation plan is being used to meet specific USDA
program requirements under the authority of NRCS, it must be approved by
the appropriate NRCS official. For example Highly Erodible Land
Compliance, Environmental Quality Incentives Program, Wetland
Restoration Program planning approval is a responsibility cannot be
delegated.

\(b\) Any conservation plan developed for a USDA program participant in
Oregon which requires approval and signature by a NRCS official must be
reviewed by an OR-NRCS employee holding a current planning certification
designation (i.e., Basic, Journey or Master). The reviewing planner will
indicate plan approval by affixing their certification stamp, initials
and date of review to the plan.

\(c\) State Conservationists will establish and implement a process to
ensure training is provided to employees. This is to include the
following actions:

\(1\) Development of State training needs and budgets for conservation
planning training.

\(2\) The State Conservationist will develop a list of qualifications
(knowledge, skills, and abilities) required for certified conservation
planner designations in addition to the requirements listed in [GM-180,
Part
409.9](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.).
These qualifications should include knowledge of the following
fundamentals such as:

> \(i\) Crop production
>
> \(ii\) Grazing systems
>
> \(iii\) Plant growth
>
> \(iv\) Soil-water-plant relationships
>
> \(v\) Plant identification
>
> \(vi\) Nutrient uptake
>
> \(vii\) Erosion processes
>
> \(viii\) Water quality
>
> \(ix\) Proficiency in scientific tools and models
>
> \(x\) Animal production
>
> \(xi\) Conservation practices and systems common to the work area
>
> \(xii\) Wildlife management
>
> \(xiii\) State and local laws and regulations that may influence
> conservation planning.

\(3\) Training must be provided through [NRCS training
courses](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/), on-the-job training or
equivalent courses and methods approved by the State Conservationist as
meeting the identified training need. Approval of equivalent courses
will be done in consultation with the Director, National Employee
Development Center.

(4) The State Conservationist will ensure that all NRCS employees that
    approve conservation plans meet minimum NRCS certified conservation
    planner requirements.

\(i\) The position description, employee development plan, and
performance work plan will reflect the following requirements for
OR-NRCS employees (full or part-time) GS-8 and above who have
conservation planning and application as a primary duty:

\(A\) employee will complete the Journey Planner requirements, as
prescribed in [OR409.9(c)(2);](#Part_409_9_c_2) and

\(B\) employee will maintain their Journey Planner status as prescribed
in [OR409.9(f)(1).](#Part_409_9_f_1)

\(ii\) For OR-NRCS positions (full and part-time) GS-8 and above who
provide technical assistance to NRCS employees and/or training in
conservation planning as a primary duty (e.g., state technical
discipline specialists), the position description, employee development
plan, and performance work plan will reflect the following requirements:

\(A\) employee will complete the Basic Planner requirements, as
prescribed in [OR409.9(c)(1);](#Part_409_9_c_1) and

\(B\) employee will maintain their Basic Planner status as prescribed in
[OR409.9(f)(1).](#Part_409_9_f_1)

\(iii\) OR-NRCS employees GS-7 and below whose primary duty is to
provide direct technical assistance to clients are encouraged to obtain
and maintain a Basic Planner status.

\(iv\) OR-NRCS engineers, civil engineering technicians, project soil
scientists, resource soil scientists, RC&D coordinators, and others who
generally do not provide planning assistance to clients are encouraged
to complete the NEDC Conservation Planning Modules 1 through 5.

\(d\) The State Conservationist will establish and maintain a list of
NRCS certified conservation planners in the State consisting of NRCS
employees, volunteers, and employees of Soil and Water Conservation
Districts and State conservation agencies that have requested to
participate.

\(d\) The OR-NRCS State Resource Conservationist will maintain a current
list of conservation planners certified by OR-NRCS.

\(e\) State Conservationists may approve non-NRCS sources to certify
conservation planners in accordance with procedures in the Conservation
Programs Manual [(CPM), Part
504](http://policy.nrcs.usda.gov/scripts/lpsiis.dll/M/M_440_504.htm).
State Conservationists may also directly certify qualified individuals,
such as third party vendors, as conservation planners contingent upon
these individuals satisfying NRCS requirements. Whether providing
assistance to an approved source, or directly certifying a qualified
individual, the State Conservationist will ensure that this assistance
is consistent with existing NRCS policies and technical guides. As a
minimum:

\(1\) State Conservationists are required to provide organizations that
are interested in becoming approved sources with the minimum criteria
that NRCS uses to certify conservation planners.

\(2\) An NRCS approved source will maintain and make it accessible to
the State Conservationist, an up-to-date list of the conservation
planners it has certified.

\(e\) SWCD employees, volunteers, and employees of NRCS partners and
Technical Service Providers who provide certified conservation planning
assistance in Oregon must meet the OR-NRCS Conservation Planning
training requirements. Qualifications and requirements for initial
certification and certification maintenance are the same as for OR-NRCS
employees.

## 

# 409.4 Planning on Units that Cross a State, County, or Field Office Boundary. {#planning-on-units-that-cross-a-state-county-or-field-office-boundary. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) NRCS assistance on an individual land unit that crosses a State,
county, or field office boundary is the responsibility of the field
office where the headquarters of the land unit is located, or as
otherwise agreed upon by the client and respective State
Conservationists. Conservation planning will be consistent with the FOTG
covering the area where the land unit is located.

\(b\) For assistance to groups or units of government on a land unit
that crosses a State boundary, the State Conservationists, in
consultation with the client, will determine by mutual consent which
State will have the lead responsibility for providing planning and other
technical assistance.

# 409.5 Documentation of Conservation Planning Data. {#documentation-of-conservation-planning-data. .eHead-Section}

Conservation planning data may be documented in hard copy, electronic
format, or both, as appropriate. Agency approved software and software
components will be used when the data is documented electronically.

Certified conservation plans [(409.3(b))]{.underline} developed in
Oregon will be documented in accordance with the National Planning
Procedures Handbook (NPPH) and Oregon Exhibit 2, utilizing the
agency-approved software. Hard copies will be maintained in field office
case files for follow-up, status reviews, quality assurance reviews, and
administrative record purposes.

[Documentation of alternatives offered must include a list of practices
that make up the system and a discussion of the impact each of the
practices will have on the resource concerns being addressed as well as
any negative impacts on other resource concerns The preferred form of
documentation in Oregon is through the use of the RMS Decision Support
Tool]{.underline}.

409.6 Conservation Planning Assistance that may have International
Impacts.

Assistance provided will be in compliance with National Instruction
280-301, International Conservation Assistance. State Conservationists
will provide access to instructions for affected field offices as
appropriate.

# 409.7 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) of 1966 and Privacy Act (PA) of 1974. {#freedom-of-information-act-foia-of-1966-and-privacy-act-pa-of-1974. .eHead-Section}

NRCS policy and procedures on FOIA and PA are contained in National
Instruction 120-310 and [GM-120, Part 408, Subpart
C.](http://policy.nrcs.usda.gov/scripts/lpsiis.dll/GM/GM_120_408_c.htm)

# 409.8 Public Participation in the Planning Process. {#public-participation-in-the-planning-process. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) Public participation is an integral part of the NRCS planning
process, and is described in [GM-400, Part
400](http://policy.nrcs.usda.gov/scripts/lpsiis.dll/gm/gm_400.htm).
Opportunities for public participation and involvement will be provided
throughout the planning process to provide for a full partnership when
working with groups (not acting as an individual), communities, and
units of government. Individual conservation plans do not require public
participation.

\(b\) Every areawide conservation planning effort will include a public
participation component to the extent determined by the State
Conservationist. Public participation activities are to be consistent
with the requirements of applicable Federal statutes, Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
regulations ([40 CFR Parts
1500‑1508](http://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/toc_ceq.htm)), Civil
Rights requirements and State statutes.

# 409.9 Minimum Criteria to Achieve an NRCS Certified Conservation Planner Designation. {#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation. .eHead-Section}

(a) NRCS certified conservation planner candidates must complete all
    modules of the NRCS Conservation Planning Course or equivalent,
    before completing the field review ([See GM-180, paragraph
    409.9(d)](#Part_409_9_d)). The State Conservationist, in
    consultation with the NRCS National Employee Development Center
    Director, will determine the equivalence of other training courses.
    The State Conservationist may provide the person a letter of waiver
    of this requirement, if the individual has previously demonstrated
    competence in RMS plan development.

\(1\) The NRCS National Employee Development Center Director has
determined that the OR-NRCS Conservation Planning Course is equivalent
to the NEDC Conservation Planning Course.

\(2\) All OR-NRCS employees responsible for providing conservation
planning assistance will complete the OR-NRCS Conservation Planning
Course. Other employees may attend the course with permission from their
supervisor. OR-NRCS generally will not waive the requirement for
completion of the OR-NRCS Conservation Planning Course for employees who
have received conservation planning training from another state.
However, the STC may grant a waiver for employees on a case by case
basis.

\(3\) The STC will grant planning certification at the various levels
(409.3(a)(3)when candidates complete all of the requisite training and
performance elements. Candidates unable to complete the required
elements within the normally prescribed time period (409.9(c)) may
request an extension by submitting to the Oregon State Conservationist a
written justification signed by the candidate's immediate supervisor.

\(b\) Candidates must possess and demonstrate the following knowledge,
skills, and abilities:

\(1\) Awareness of the National Conservation Program.

\(2\) Skill in applying the NRCS Conservation Planning Process.

\(3\) Ability to plan and implement conservation practices common to the
geographic area.

\(4\) Knowledge of NRCS Field Office Technical Guide standards and
specifications for applicable conservation practices in the State and
locality.

\(4\) OR-NRCS requires Job Approval Authority
([JAA](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/PlanningWorksheets/SkillsMatrixGM340AmendOR2_Exhibit1.xls))
for FOTG Section IV conservation practices (refer to 340-GM, OR Part
404).

\(5\) Skill in applying approved erosion prediction technology (Revised
Universal Soil Loss Equation and the Wind Erosion Equation).

\(6\) Skill in using applicable site vulnerability assessment tools.

\(7\) Knowledge of Federal, State, tribal, and local laws and
regulations.

\(c\) Candidates must meet any additional minimum qualifications and
criteria for conservation planning assistance established by the State
Conservationist.

\(c\) The State Resource Conservationist will approve planner status for
OR-NRCS employees based on the following requirements:

[]{#Part_409_9_c_1 .anchor}(1) Basic Planner Status:

\(i\) complete the OR-NRCS Conservation Planning Course within 12 months
of starting the course..

\(ii\) demonstrate skill in using applicable resource inventory and site
assessment tools.

\(iii\) demonstrate knowledge of the NEPA process.

\(iii\) demonstrate the ability to effectively assist clients in
completing the conservation planning process.

[]{#Part_409_9_c_2 .anchor}(2) Journey Planner Status:

\(i\) attain the Basic Planner status.

\(ii\) consistently demonstrate knowledge, skills, and abilities in the
nine-step planning process.

\(iii\) submit for review and approval by the State Resource
Conservationist or assigned designee, within one fiscal year, five
~~RMS~~ plans that ~~have~~ meet the requirements of 409.1(b)..

\(iv\) demonstrate the ability to provide conservation planning guidance
and training to others.

\(3\) Master Planner Status:

\(i\) demonstrate knowledge of resource conservation systems used in
agronomy, forestry, range, and wildlife.

\(ii\) demonstrate training abilities in the nine-step planning process.

\(iii\) demonstrate knowledge of area-wide conservation planning process
and techniques.

\(iv\) fulfill assigned responsibility for conservation planning quality
assurance at basin or state level.

\(v\) exemplify the spirit of a conservation planning leader,
consistently following policy and procedures.

> \(vi\) secure recommendation from supervisor [and Basin Team Leader,
> and Leader for Field Operations]{.underline}.

\(4\) [All plans submitted for initial planner status certification and
for moving from one status to another (e.g., Basic to Journey)
must:]{.underline}

\(i\) comply with 409.1(b) and 409.5.

\(ii\) address, at a minimum, all land uses and all acres found within a
tract.

\(iii\) address operations with agriculture (excluding cropland that is
exclusively in CRP), livestock, wildlife, or forest production goals.

\(iv\) encompass steps 1 through 7 of the planning process. (Those plans
that only reflect minor revisions to existing plans may not be used to
qualify for planner certification.)

\(v\) comply with OR-NRCS Oversight and Evaluation Policy (340-GM,
Amend. OR2, Part 404, dated October 2001). Employees must have current
JAA or have specifications and designs reviewed and approved by those
with appropriate JAA before submitting plans for certification.

[]{#Part_409_9_d .anchor}(d) Candidates must complete at least one field
reviewed Resource Management System (RMS) plan for a conservation
management unit (CMU).

\(1\) The planner will be accompanied to the field by the State
Conservationist's designee to meet with the decisionmaker.

\(1\) The State Conservationist's designee in Oregon is defined as any
Master Planner or OR-NRCS Conservation Planning Course instructor. The
certified field review with employee and decision-maker is required to
satisfy requirements of the OR-NRCS Conservation Planning Course.

\(2\) The candidate will be expected to demonstrate competency in the
planning process and plan development.

\(3\) The observer will evaluate the planner's involvement with the
decision-maker (landowner or land operator) in the planning process and
whether all resource concerns associated with the CMU are adequately
addressed.

\(4\) Field reviewed plans must be approved by the State Conservationist
or designee prior to final delivery to the decisionmaker.

\(e\) NRCS certified conservation planners are responsible for keeping
their own individual development plan updated to reflect conservation
planning training needed and completed to maintain or increase their
skill level. Training to maintain and update conservation planning
skills must, at a minimum, occur once every three years.

\(1\) The State Conservationist will determine the type and minimum
hours of training necessary to maintain the certified conservation
planner designation.

(2) Supervisors and certified conservation planners share the
    responsibility to identify and provide opportunities for employees
    to achieve needed maintenance or additional knowledge enhancement
    requirements.

\(2\) Certified Planners are expected to take advantage of opportunities
for continuing education and self-development in conservation planning.

\(3\) NRCS certified conservation planners are responsible for keeping
their own records of training completed and providing the information to
NRCS as evidence of meeting the minimum certification requirements.

\(f\) The State Conservationist will address maintaining the certified
conservation planner process and designation in the "State Quality
Assurance Plan(s)".

\(1\) Each certified conservation planner's designation will be reviewed
at least once every three years by the State Conservationist or
designee.

[]{#Part_409_9_f_1 .anchor}(1) To maintain planner certification OR-NRCS
certified planners are required to obtain review and approval by the
State Resource Conservationist of a plan that meets the requirements of
409.1(b) to by September 30.

\(i\) All plans submitted for planner recertification must:

\(A\) comply with 409.1(b) and 409.5.

\(B\) address, at a minimum, all acres found within a Conservation
Management Unit (CMU) as described in the National Planning Procedures
Handbook [Part
600-A-11-b](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/NPPH/H_180_600_A_11.doc).

\(C\) address resource concerns or opportunities identified on any of
the following NRCS landuse designations; crop, forest, grazed forest,
grazed range, hay, or pasture.. (This excludes cropland enrolled in CRP,
although CREP plans are acceptable.)

\(D\) encompass steps 1 through 7 of the planning process. (Those plans
that only reflect minor plan revisions may not be used for
recertification.)

\(E\) have been completed within the previous 12 months.

\(ii\) If a planner submits a plan of superior quality for review by
June 1st, the State Resource Conservationist may waive the requirement
for a plan review for the following year. Extended certification
incentives may be offered by the STC to course instructors and/or Master
Planners.

\(iii\) Upon completion of the initial review the reviewer will provide
the planner with a completed "Conservation Plan Review" worksheet (see
[NPPH Oregon Exhibit
2](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/NPPH/OR_Exhibit 2.doc)). The planner
will assure that the original is sent to the State Resource
Conservationist.

\(iv\) Supervisors of planners may determine that the plan review will
include a field evaluation. Requests for field evaluations will be made
to the State Resource Conservationist by the first of June so that the
field review and certification documentation can be completed prior to
September 30.

\(v\) In addition to the above, in order to maintain their status,
Master Planners must:

\(A\) serve as a designated \"Basin Planning Lead\", be a designated
discipline lead, or a specialist with demonstrated RMS planning
experience

\(B\) serve on the conservation planning course instructor cadre

\(C\) assist the State Resource Conservationist with implementing the
conservation planning certification policy.

\(D\) conduct periodic assessment reviews.

\(2\) A sufficient number of conservation plans will be reviewed to
determine that the conservation plans meet the NRCS planning policy and
follow the procedures and guidelines listed in the
[NPPH](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/NPPH/H_180_600.doc).

\(2\) At the discretion of the reviewer, additional planning documents
may be reviewed if needed to ascertain quality, proficiency, and
potential training needs.

\(3\) If an individual fails to meet the criteria for the certified
conservation planner designation, the status will be revoked and the
individual must be re-certified before providing conservation planning
assistance.

\(3\) Individuals re-qualifying for OR-NRCS conservation planner
certification, when previous certification has been withdrawn, will be
restored to the [Basic planner status]{.underline} upon satisfactorily
completing the following requirements:

\(i\) Within a 12 month period complete two new RMS conservation plans
in compliance with 409.1(b) and 409.5, approved in advance by the State
Resource Conservationist, each covering, at a minimum, one tract.

\(ii\) Plan all land uses and acres within the tracts.

\(iii\) Submit the plans for initial review to the State Resource
Conservationist after completing planning steps 1-6.

\(iv\) Upon approval from the State Resource Conservationist and in the
company of their supervisor or an approved plan reviewer present
alternatives to the clients and obtain the client's decisions.

\(v\) Submit completed plans reflecting client decisions to the State
Resource Conservationist for final review.

\(vi\) Obtain from the reviewer a completed "Conservation Plan Review"
worksheet ([NPPH Oregon Exhibit
2](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/NPPH/OR_Exhibit 2.doc)) for each plan
and send the originals to the State Resource Conservationist.

\(vii\) Upon completion of the requirements to regain certification the
planner will be reinstated as a Basic level planner for the balance of
the fiscal year.

\(4\) If multiple certified planner levels exist, an individual could
become decertified at a higher designated level while retaining a lower
certification level.

\(4\) The loss of certification at any planner status level results in
the loss of all levels of certification. A Master or Journey level
planner who becomes decertified must complete the requirements in
409.9(c) to regain their Journey or Master Planner status.

# 409.10 Minimum Standards for Providers of Conservation Technical Assistance Associated with Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plans. {#minimum-standards-for-providers-of-conservation-technical-assistance-associated-with-comprehensive-nutrient-management-plans. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) A comprehensive nutrient management plan (CNMP) describes and
documents a conservation system within a conservation plan that is
unique to animal feeding operations.

\(a\) A Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP) is a grouping of
conservation practices and management activities related to animal
operations which, when combined into a system, will ensure that both
agricultural production goals and natural resource concerns dealing with
nutrient and organic by-products and their impacts on the environment
are achieved. The NRCS in Oregon will provide technical assistance to
AFO/CAFO operators, in general, with 1,000 animal units or less as staff
is available.

> \(1\) At a minimum, a CNMP must address quality criteria to the
> sustainable level for soil erosion and water quality for the planning
> unit associated with the animal feeding operation. Conservation
> planning activities associated with the development of a CNMP,
> however, should attempt to achieve a CNMP that addresses quality
> criteria to the RMS level for all five natural resources (soil, water,
> air, plants, and animals).
>
> \(1\) Each CNMP will meet the requirements of Section IV of the NRCS
> FOTG for those conservation practices contained in each CNMP and meet
> applicable state, federal, tribal and local regulations.
>
> \(2\) Any CNMP that is developed by a NRCS or partner employee will
> have the plan approved by a NRCS certified conservation planner, as
> defined by GM-180, Part
> [409.3](#requirements-for-providing-conservation-planning-assistance.)
> or GM-180, Part
> [409.9](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.).

\(2\) CNMP's developed by Oregon NRCS or partner employees will be
approved by a conservation planner with specialized training and
experience in comprehensive nutrient management planning and
implementation. CNMP's will be independently developed and/or approved
by an individual who:

\(i\) has successfully taken the NEDC Conservation Planning Course,
Modules 1-5, or be an Oregon NRCS certified conservation planner having
met the requirements of 180-GM Part
[409.9](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.)
and Oregon Amendments to 180-GM Part 409.9.

\(ii\) has successfully completed the [NRCS Introduction to Water
Quality](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/introdh20.html) Course.

\(iii\) has successfully completed the [NRCS Agricultural Waste
Management System Training Course -- Level
I](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/agwasteprimer.html).

\(iv\) has successfully completed the [NRCS Agricultural Waste
Management System Training Course -- Level
II.](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/agwaste2.html)

\(v\) has successfully completed the [NRCS Nutrient Management
Considerations in Conservation Planning
Course](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/nutandpest.html) OR
completed self paced modules 1-6 of the NEDC Nutrient Management
Considerations in Conservation Planning Course and submitted a nutrient
management plan to the State Resource Conservationist which has been
reviewed and approved.

\(3\) A CNMP may be developed using elements as input from AFO
Specialist in engineering, land treatment practices, nutrient management
or feed management.

\(4\) If the certified conservation planner approving a CNMP does not
have Job Approval Authority (JAA) for those related practices identified
for each element of a CNMP, they will ensure that the AFO Specialist
submitting those elements for inclusion in the CNMP has appropriate JAA
for the related practices (see Table 1.1). In order to receive JAA for
those practices shown on Table 1.1 which are related to an AFO,
individuals must have training as listed below in combination with
demonstrated competence for the practice.

\(b\) A CNMP may be comprised of six possible elements:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| \(1\) Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage.                     |
|                                                                       |
| \(2\) Land Treatment Practices.                                       |
|                                                                       |
| \(3\) Nutrient Management.                                            |
|                                                                       |
| \(4\) Record Keeping.                                                 |
|                                                                       |
| \(5\) Feed Management.                                                |
|                                                                       |
| \(6\) Other Utilization Options.                                      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

\(b\) While all six elements need to be considered during the
development of the CNMP Table 1.1 identifies the three core elements of
a CNMP Oregon NRCS is most commonly involved with and lists the related
practices.

[]{#Table_1_1 .anchor}Table 1

+---------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| CORE ELEMENT  | RELATED PRACTICES                                    |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| I. Manure and | 313 Waste Storage Facility                           |
| Wastewater    |                                                      |
| Handling and  | 316 Animal Mortality Facility                        |
| Storage       |                                                      |
|               | 317 Composting Facility                              |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 359 Waste Treatment Lagoon                           |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 366 Anaerobic Digester -- Controlled Temp.           |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 561 Heavy Use Area Protection                        |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 634 Manure Transfer                                  |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| II\. Land     | 328 Conservation Crop Rotation                       |
| Treatment     |                                                      |
| Practices     | 329 Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip    |
|               | Till/Direct Seed                                     |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 332 Contour Buffer Strips                            |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 340 Cover Crop                                       |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 344 Residue Management, Seasonal                     |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 345 Residue and Tillage Management, Mulch Till       |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 362 Diversion                                        |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 393 Filter Strip                                     |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 412 Grassed Waterway                                 |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 511 Forage Harvest Management                        |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 512 Pasture and Hayland Planting                     |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 528 Prescribed Grazing                               |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 600 Terrace                                          |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| III\.         | 590 Nutrient Management                              |
| Nutrient      |                                                      |
| Management    | 449 Irrigation Water Management                      |
|               |                                                      |
|               | 633 Waste Utilization                                |
+---------------+------------------------------------------------------+

\(c\) All of the elements, except Record Keeping, are technical in
nature and require a certain level of acquired expertise to adequately
address. To adequately address a specific element of a CNMP would
require the planning and implementation of conservation practices that
address the resource concerns identified for that specific element. An
individual that has demonstrated a competency in planning and
implementing conservation practices associated with one or more of the
specific elements of a CNMP would qualify to be designated a "certified
specialist."

\(d\) Record Keeping is a task completed solely by the owner and/or
operator and is not an element that involves an approval by a certified
specialist.

\(e\) The elements Feed Management and Other Utilization Options at
present do not have NRCS conservation practice standards associated with
their development and implementation. These elements are considerations
in the planning process and do not require NRCS element certification.
Should feed management become more than a consideration as a part of the
CNMP a qualified animal nutritionist should be used.

\(f\) The State Conservationist will establish a certification program,
or use a program established by a national organization, university,
Cooperative State Research and Extension Service, State government, or
other appropriately qualified entity, that provides for certified
specialists associated with the core elements of a CNMP, such as the
following:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| \(1\) Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage.                     |
|                                                                       |
| \(2\) Land Treatment Practices.                                       |
|                                                                       |
| \(3\) Nutrient Management.                                            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

\(g\) This paragraph establishes the minimum requirements associated
with certification of individuals who will approve the development
and/or design and implementation of elements of a CNMP. Any
certification program must satisfy these requirements. Candidates for
certification must also meet any additional qualifications and
requirements established by the State Conservationist. The State
Conservationist will ensure that all pertinent State certification and
licensing requirements (e.g., engineering license, certified nutrient
management specialist.) are met as a part of any program established.

# (1) General Requirements.  {#general-requirements. .eHead-Para(a)(1)}

This subsection describes the general requirements that the State
Conservationist must address in the approval of any certification
program for "certified specialists". The State Conservationist will
determine how competency will be demonstrated or measured as part of the
certification process for each of the following:

\(i\) An awareness of the NRCS conservation planning process comparable
to the information contained in the [NRCS Conservation Planning
Course](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/consplan/), Modules One to Five.

\(ii\) An awareness of agricultural waste management systems equivalent
to the information contained in the [NRCS Agricultural Waste Management
System Training: A Primer
Course](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/agwasteprimer.html)

\(iii\) The contents and use of the NRCS Field Office Technical Guide as
related to specific elements of the CNMP for which expertise is being
provided.

\(iv\) Criteria associated with the various elements of a CNMP as
contained in the [NRCS Comprehensive Nutrient Management Planning
Technical
Guidance](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/NPPH/H_180_600_E_5.doc).

\(v\) Applicable local, State, tribal, and Federal laws and regulations
that impact the elements of a CNMP.

# (2) Requirements Specific to Elements of a CNMP.  {#requirements-specific-to-elements-of-a-cnmp. .eHead-Para(a)(1)}

This subsection describes the requirements specific to certain elements
of a CNMP. As a part of the certification process, the State
Conservationist will determine how competency will be demonstrated or
measured for the following elements:

# (i) Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage.  {#i-manure-and-wastewater-handling-and-storage. .eHead-Para-(a)(1)(a)}

This element addresses the components and activities associated with the
production facility, feedlot, manure and wastewater storage and
treatment structures and areas, and any areas or mechanisms used to
facilitate transfer of manure and wastewater. The following are
required:

\(A\) Knowledge adequate to design and implement conservation practices
typically used to address this element of a CNMP. The State
Conservationist will need to identify the conservation practices
typically used in the State to address this element.

\(B\) Working knowledge of the information contained in the NRCS
Agricultural Waste Management Systems Level 2 Course, or equivalent.

> \(i\) To independently design or approve practices related to Element
> I, Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage ([Table
> 1.1](#Table_1_1)) for inclusion in a CNMP, a non-federal licensed
> engineer or federal employee with appropriate JAA will be required to:
>
> \(A\) have successfully completed the [NEDC Conservation Planning
> Course, Modules 1-5](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/consplan/), or be
> an Oregon NRCS [Certified Conservation
> Planner](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.).
>
> \(B\) have successfully completed the [NRCS Agricultural Waste
> Management System Training Course -- Levels
> I](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/agwasteprimer.html) [and
> II.]{.underline}
>
> \(C\) be familiar with the contents and use of the [NRCS
> FOTG](http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/efotg/).

# (ii) Land Treatment Practices.  {#ii-land-treatment-practices. .eHead-Para-(a)(1)(a)}

This element addresses the land on which manure and wastewater from an
animal feeding operations will be applied. The following knowledge and
skills are required:

\(A\) Skill in applying soil loss and/or wind erosion prediction tools,
as appropriate.

\(B\) Skill in using site vulnerability assessment tools. Acceptable
site vulnerability assessment tools allowable for use in a State will be
specifically identified as part of that State's certification process.

\(C\) Knowledge of the NRCS conservation planning process.

\(D\) Knowledge adequate to design and implement conservation practices
common to the geographic area.

\(ii\) To independently design and/or approve practices related to
Element II, Land Treatment Practices ([Table 1.1](#Table_1_1)) required
for inclusion in a CNMP an individual with appropriate JAA will be
required to:

> \(A\) have successfully completed the [NEDC Conservation Planning
> Course, Modules 1-5](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/consplan/), or be a
> Oregon NRCS [Certified Conservation
> Planner](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.).
>
> \(B\) have demonstrated competence in using the site vulnerability
> assessment tools [Phosphorus
> Index](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/agronomy/Phosphorus_Index), and
> [Nitrogen
> Index](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/Technical Notes/Water Quality/Water Quality-TN1.doc).
>
> \(C\) have successfully completed the RUSLE2 and the WEQ Training
> Courses and demonstrate competence in applying the soil loss and wind
> erosion prediction tools
> ([RUSLE2](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/agronomy/ruslels) and
> [WEQ](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/agronomy/Wind Erosion/)).
>
> \(D\) have successfully completed the NRCS Introduction to Water
> Quality course.
>
> \(E\) have successfully completed the [NRCS Agricultural Waste
> Management System Training Course -- Level
> I.](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/agwasteprimer.html)

# (iii) Nutrient Management.  {#iii-nutrient-management. .eHead-Para-(a)(1)(a)}

This element addresses the requirements for land application of all
nutrients and organic by-products (e.g., animal manure, commercial
fertilizers, crop residues, legume credits, and irrigation water) that
must be evaluated and documented for each Conservation Management Unit.
The following knowledge, skills, and abilities are required:

\(A\) Working knowledge of the information contained in the NRCS
Introduction to Water Quality Course, or equivalent.

\(B\) Skill in using nutrient risk assessment tools. Acceptable risk
assessment tools allowed for use in a State will be identified as part
of that State's certification process.

\(C\) Working knowledge of the information in the NRCS Nutrient and Pest
Management Considerations in Conservation Planning Course, as it
pertains to nutrient management, or equivalent.

(D) Skill in developing a plan to address the nutrient management
    conservation practice in compliance with the NRCS Nutrient
    Management (FOTG Practice Code 590), and, as appropriate, Irrigation
    Water Management (FOTG Practice Code 449) conservation practice
    standard(s).

\(iii\) To independently design and/or approve practices related to
Element III, Nutrient Management ([Table 1.1](#Table_1_1)) required for
inclusion in a CNMP an individual with appropriate JAA will be required
to:

> \(A\) have successfully completed the [NEDC Conservation Planning
> Course, Modules 1-5](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/consplan/), or be a
> Oregon NRCS [Certified Conservation
> Planner](#minimum-criteria-to-achieve-an-nrcs-certified-conservation-planner-designation.).
>
> \(B\) have successfully completed the [NRCS Introduction to Water
> Quality course](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/introdh20.html).
>
> \(C\) Have successfully completed the [NEDC Nutrient Management
> Considerations in Conservation Planning
> Course](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/nutandpest.html) OR
> completed self paced modules 1-6 of the NEDC Nutrient Management
> Considerations in Conservation Planning Course and submitted a
> nutrient management plan to the State Resource Conservationist which
> has been reviewed and approved.
>
> \(D\) demonstrate competence in using the nutrient risk assessment
> tools [Phosphorus
> Index](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/agronomy/Phosphorus_Index),
> [Nitrogen
> Index](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/Technical Notes/Water Quality/Water Quality-TN1.doc),
> and the [Farm Irrigation Rating
> Index](ftp://ftp.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pub/eng/DesignAids/FIRI) (FIRI).

# (h) Training. {#h-training. .eHead-Para(a)}

Training must be provided through NRCS training courses, on-the-job
training, or equivalent courses and methods approved by the State
Conservationist as meeting the identified training requirement. The
State Conservationist, in consultation with the Director, National
Employee Development Center will grant approval for course equivalency
in lieu of an NRCS formal training course.

# (i) Maintaining Certifications.  {#i-maintaining-certifications. .eHead-Para(a)}

Certified specialists are responsible for keeping and completing
updating of their own individual development plan to reflect training
needed and to maintain or increase their skill level. Training to
maintain and update skills must, at a minimum, occur once every three
years. The State Conservationist will determine the type and minimum
hours of training necessary to maintain the certified specialist
designation.

\(i\) Individuals designing, implementing or approving practices related
to the core elements will be required to maintain JAA in related
practices. This will be reviewed by the state lead for the respective
element at least once every three years.

# (j) Quality Assurance.  {#j-quality-assurance. .eHead-Para(a)}

The State Conservationist will address maintaining certified specialist
certification programs in their "State Quality Assurance Plan." The
State Conservationist or designee will review each certified specialist
designation, at least once every three years. A sufficient number of
plans and/or design reviews will be completed to determine whether the
plans and/or designs developed and implemented will meet NRCS
conservation practice standards and policy, and the intent of the
Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan Technical Guidance. If an
individual fails to meet the qualifications or criteria established for
a certified specialist designation the status will be revoked by the
certifying organization, and the individual must re-certify

# (k) Certified Specialists. {#k-certified-specialists. .eHead-Para(a)}

NRCS will maintain a list of certified specialists certified by NRCS.
Each NRCS-approved source of a certification program for third parties
will maintain a current list of specialists certified by that program
and will make it available to the State Conservationist.

# 409.11 Minimum Standards for Providers of Conservation Technical Assistance Associated with Conservation Planning that includes Pest Management. {#minimum-standards-for-providers-of-conservation-technical-assistance-associated-with-conservation-planning-that-includes-pest-management. .eHead-Section}

\(a\) NRCS roles in pest management are:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| \(1\) Evaluating environmental risks associated with probable pest    |
| management recommendations.                                           |
|                                                                       |
| \(2\) Developing appropriate mitigation alternatives to minimize      |
| environmental risks.                                                  |
|                                                                       |
| \(3\) Assisting clients to adopt Integrated Pest Management (IPM)     |
| that helps protect natural resources.                                 |
|                                                                       |
| \(4\) Assisting clients to develop and implement an acceptable pest   |
| management component of their overall conservation plan.              |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

\(b\) The State Conservationist must ensure that all NRCS personnel who
provide technical assistance for pest management are properly trained
and meet applicable requirements for their positions as well as State or
local licensing and/or certification requirements. In addition, the
State Conservationist must establish a process to provide continuing
education to maintain employee competency.

\(c\) Although certification is not required to develop or revise pest
management components of conservation plans, all persons who approve
pest management components of conservation plans must be certified
specialists in pest management**.** A certified conservation planner as
required by [GM-180, Paragraph
409.3(b)](#requirements-for-providing-conservation-planning-assistance.)
will approve the overall conservation plan.

\(d\) The State Conservationist must establish a program to certify
specialists who approve pest management components of conservation
plans, including:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| \(1\) NRCS employees                                                  |
|                                                                       |
| \(2\) Volunteers                                                      |
|                                                                       |
| \(3\) Employees of Soil and Water Conservation Districts and State    |
| Conservation agencies that have requested to participate.             |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

\(e\) The State Conservationist may establish a program to certify third
party vendors and other private sector individuals such as certified
crop advisors and crop consultants. Existing programs from national
certifying organizations, land grant universities, Cooperative State
Research Education, and Extension Service, State government agencies and
other appropriately qualified entities may be utilized as components of
the NRCS certification program in a State.

\(f\) In addition, the State Conservationist must establish a process to
provide continuing education to maintain certification for all
specialists who approve pest management components of conservation
plans.

\(g\) The State Conservationist must address the following in
establishing a program for certifying specialists who approve pest
management components of conservation plans:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| \(1\) An understanding of the conservation planning process.          |
|                                                                       |
| \(2\) An understanding of the production systems where pest           |
| management will be applied.                                           |
|                                                                       |
| \(3\) An understanding of local, State, and Federal laws and          |
| regulations related to pest management.                               |
|                                                                       |
| \(4\) An understanding of natural resource concerns related to pest   |
| management activities.                                                |
|                                                                       |
| \(5\) An awareness of the content of NRCS pest management policy.     |
|                                                                       |
| \(6\) An understanding of the content and use of the NRCS FOTG.       |
|                                                                       |
| \(7\) Proficiency in applying the NRCS pest management standard       |
| [(FOTG Practice Code                                                  |
| 595](http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/efotg/)).                     |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

\(h\) For items 1 through 7 listed above, the State Conservationist must
determine how competency will be demonstrated. The following are minimum
requirements:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| \(1\) Successful completion of ["NRCS Conservation Planning Modules   |
| One through Five](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/consplan/)" or        |
| equivalent.                                                           |
|                                                                       |
| \(2\) Successful completion of the "[NRCS Introduction to Water       |
| Quality                                                               |
| Course](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/introdh20.html)" or     |
| equivalent.                                                           |
|                                                                       |
| \(3\) Successful completion of the pest management track of the NRCS  |
| ["Nutrient and Pest Management Considerations in Conservation         |
| Planning](http://www.nedc.nrcs.usda.gov/catalog/nutandpest.html)"     |
| course or equivalent.                                                 |
|                                                                       |
| \(4\) Demonstrated skill in using the Windows Pesticide Screening     |
| [Tool (WIN-PST](http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/pestmgt/winpst.html))    |
| and/or other appropriate pest management environmental risk screening |
| tools.                                                                |
|                                                                       |
| \(5\) Demonstrated skill in developing the pest management component  |
| of a conservation plan based on the State Pest Management [(FOTG      |
| Practice Code 595](http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/efotg/))        |
| conservation practice standard.                                       |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+