+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| ** | * | **Test Step Questions**      | **Clarification Made to     |
| Te | * |                              | 3/15/2000 Posting**         |
| st | P |                              |                             |
| St | a |                              |                             |
| ep | g |                              |                             |
| ** | e |                              |                             |
|    | * |                              |                             |
|    | * |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    | * |                              |                             |
|    | * |                              |                             |
|    | N |                              |                             |
|    | o |                              |                             |
|    | . |                              |                             |
|    | * |                              |                             |
|    | * |                              |                             |
+====+===+==============================+=============================+
| C  |   | Transaction date on all test | Change transaction date on  |
| yc |   | steps in Cycle 5             | all test steps in Cycle 5   |
| le |   |                              | from 11/25/99 to 11/26/99   |
| 5  |   |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| G  |   | It is not clear that the     | Add a general assumption to |
| en |   | references to Document ID    | the test plan that "Vendor  |
| er |   | (invoice) in all of the      | Invoice ID's are external   |
| al |   | payment cases refer to an    | document numbers and cannot |
|    |   | external document number.    | be substituted."            |
|    |   | This question arose on more  |                             |
|    |   | than one test and was a      |                             |
|    |   | point of contention.         |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| G  |   | The apportionment category   | The apportionment category  |
| en |   | should be eliminated from    | for all 0192 transactions   |
| er |   | all transactions for fund    | should be C (not subject to |
| al |   | 0192 since these funds are   | apportionment), since the   |
|    |   | not subject to               | entries flow through        |
|    |   | apportionment.               | account 4620 (and not       |
|    |   |                              | 4610). Revise all test      |
|    |   |                              | steps GL effects            |
|    |   |                              | accordingly. See roadmap    |
|    |   |                              | pages 3-6 for test step     |
|    |   |                              | numbers.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| G  |   | For transactions that use    | All test steps that use     |
| en |   | Reimbursable funds,          | reimbursable funds (see     |
| er |   | sometimes the Fund Category  | roadmap) should have an     |
| al |   | in GL effects is "R" and     | apportionment category of A |
|    |   | sometimes it is "A". Fund    | or B identified in inputs,  |
|    |   | Category shown for           | expected results and GL     |
|    |   | reimbursable funds should be | effects and a funding       |
|    |   | consistent throughout the    | source ("Direct/Reimb.") of |
|    |   | test script. The correct     | R identified in inputs and  |
|    |   | apportionment category is    | GL effects.                 |
|    |   | "A" or "B". The "R"          |                             |
|    |   | designation indicates the    | The addition of the funding |
|    |   | source of the funding -      | source attribute (D or R)   |
|    |   | reimbursable versus direct.  | to GL effects is also       |
|    |   |                              | needed for all test steps.  |
|    |   |                              | Check all queries for the   |
|    |   |                              | impact of the new element.  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| G  |   | Add account titles to GL     | Add account titles to GL    |
| en |   | effects.                     | effects.                    |
| er |   |                              |                             |
| al |   |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| St |   | In the Cycle 1 review, on    | *The \$12,000 reduction in  |
| at |   | the Status of Funds Report,  | unfilled customer orders    |
| us |   | the test report expected     | made in RM.3.1 is           |
| of |   | results are incorrect:       | erroneously not included in |
| F  |   |                              | the fund 0201/R status of   |
| un |   | The unfilled customer orders | funds report. O*n the       |
| ds |   | should be \$138,000 for Fund | Status of Funds reports,    |
| Re |   | 0201/R.                      | from Cycle 1 on, reduce     |
| po |   |                              | 0201/R unfilled customer    |
| rt |   | For Fund 0202/B, the Status  | orders by \$12,000 to       |
|    |   | of Funds Report should       | \$138,000. Actual           |
|    |   | reflect rescission of        | reimbursements earned in    |
|    |   | \$250,000 for GL account     | 0201/R are correct as       |
|    |   | 4392.                        | \$12,000. Fund 0201/A       |
|    |   |                              | reporting is okay because   |
|    |   | In Cycle 4, PM.16.1 and      | it is not impacted by the   |
|    |   | PM.7.1, we instruct the      | RM.3.1 GL entry.            |
|    |   | vendor to expend \$980 in    |                             |
|    |   | 0201/R funds, but the status | *The \$250,000 rescission   |
|    |   | of funds reports shows the   | of 0202/B funds is          |
|    |   | expenditure in 0201/A funds. | erroneously not included in |
|    |   |                              | the status of funds         |
|    |   |                              | report.* In the Status of   |
|    |   |                              | Funds reports, from Cycle 1 |
|    |   |                              | on, show 0202/B             |
|    |   |                              | appropriations as follows:\ |
|    |   |                              | Total -- \$7,000,000        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 10000 -           |
|    |   |                              | \$7,500,000                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 13200 -           |
|    |   |                              | \$(500,000)                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In the Status of Funds      |
|    |   |                              | reports, from Cycle 4 on,   |
|    |   |                              | reduce 0201/A expenditures  |
|    |   |                              | in org. code 11100 (and in  |
|    |   |                              | total) by \$980 and         |
|    |   |                              | increase 0201/R             |
|    |   |                              | expenditures by \$980.      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In the Status of Funds      |
|    |   |                              | reports, from Cycle 4 on,   |
|    |   |                              | increase 0201/A allotments  |
|    |   |                              | available in org. code      |
|    |   |                              | 11100 (and in total) by     |
|    |   |                              | \$980 and decrease 0201/R   |
|    |   |                              | allotments available by     |
|    |   |                              | \$980.                      |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   | Vendor numbers for vendors   | In test plan setup data,    |
| st |   | V-06 and V-08.               | change vendor number for    |
| Pl |   |                              | Mary Traveler to V-06 and   |
| an |   |                              | vendor number for GSA       |
|    |   |                              | Federal Supply Service to   |
|    |   |                              | V-08.                       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  |   | JFMIP Status of Funds        | Adjusted test Status of     |
| ep |   | Report, fund 0202B, org code | Funds Reports, from Cycle 2 |
| or |   | 11200, incorrectly shows the | on, for the \$15,000        |
| ts |   | \$15000 obligation from      | obligation from FD.7.2 that |
|    |   | FD.7.2 as an Unobligated     | was incorrectly reported as |
|    |   | Commitment.                  | an Unobligated Commitment   |
|    |   |                              | instead of an Unliquidated  |
|    |   |                              | Obligation.                 |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Ro |   | Update for test revisions.   | Updated Road Map for        |
| ad |   |                              | relevant test revisions,    |
| M  |   |                              | added a column for          |
| ap |   |                              | reporting (D)irect vs.      |
|    |   |                              | (R)eimbursable funding, and |
|    |   |                              | added a section on Customer |
|    |   |                              | Activity.                   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   |                              | Revised the Test Plan's     |
| st |   |                              | Output Table by replacing   |
| Pl |   |                              | the current required output |
| an |   |                              | for R.1.2 with "Transaction |
|    |   |                              | Register for Cycle 2" and   |
|    |   |                              | deleting the separate       |
|    |   |                              | listing for the Transaction |
|    |   |                              | Register at the end of      |
|    |   |                              | Cycle 2.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   | Test plan output for Cycle   | Changed the required output |
| st |   | 5, PM.15.2, does not agree   | for TC-PM.15.2 (in Cycle 5) |
| Pl |   | with (revised) test step     | to \"Produce the SF-224\"   |
| an |   | instructions.                | instead of \"Query to       |
|    |   |                              | verify data available for   |
|    |   |                              | producing an SF-224.\"      |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   | The reports that are listed  | Revised the Text Execution  |
| st |   | as required at the end of    | Cycles chart in the Test    |
| Pl |   | Cycle 2 are not complete.    | Plan as follows: removed    |
| an |   | (VENDOR)                     | the Cycle 2 bullet that     |
|    |   |                              | required "a report showing  |
|    |   | The Test Plan lists a        | open documents by type and  |
|    |   | report, Open Obligations and | fund\..." This report is    |
|    |   | Commitments, as a            | not required at the end of  |
|    |   | requirement at the end of    | the Cycle.                  |
|    |   | Cycle 2. However, this is    |                             |
|    |   | not listed in the reports    |                             |
|    |   | output in the test script.   |                             |
|    |   | Add this report to test      |                             |
|    |   | script or delete it from     |                             |
|    |   | Test Plan output list.       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   | In the setup data, the       | In the Object Classes       |
| st |   | object class 1210 is listed  | section of the Test Plan    |
| Pl |   | as a sub to 1100 (it is      | setup data, changed         |
| an |   | indented, so one may believe | Identifier 1210 to 1200 and |
|    |   | that 1210 is rolled up to    | removed the indentation of  |
|    |   | 1100). 1210 should be set up | the Description.            |
|    |   | as 1200 (reference FD.2.2)   |                             |
|    |   | in the setup data.           |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   |                              | Deleted standard discount   |
| st |   |                              | terms from the setup data   |
| Pl |   |                              | for the following vendors:  |
| an |   |                              | Carlton (V-01) and JMK      |
|    |   |                              | (V-03).                     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| Te |   | Test team Status of Funds    | Revise the Status of Funds  |
| st |   | Report has been revised to   | format for the revolving    |
| Pl |   | eliminate the last line in   | fund 0192 in the Test Plan  |
| an |   | the revolving fund (0192)    | by deleting the last line,  |
|    |   | report, which is duplicative | "Available Balance," which  |
|    |   | of the third row of the      | is duplicative of the third |
|    |   | report. Status of Funds      | line, "Other Funds          |
|    |   | format in the Test Plan has  | Available."                 |
|    |   | not been revised             |                             |
|    |   | accordingly.                 |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 0 |                              | Changed the second sentence |
| .1 | 0 |                              | of the instructions to read |
| .1 | 6 |                              | "the" customer instead of   |
|    |   |                              | "each" customer, since only |
|    |   |                              | one customer (record) is    |
|    |   |                              | created in this test step.  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | There are no data inputs for | Add inputs section 3., as   |
| .1 | 0 | the third event in this step | follows:                    |
| .6 | 7 | -- the apportionment of the  |                             |
|    |   | reimbursable funds.          | 1.  Quarterly Apportionment |
|    |   |                              |     of Reimbursable Funds,  |
|    |   |                              |     Category A              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount, Total \$600,000     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount, 1^st^ Quarter       |
|    |   |                              | \$150,000                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount, 2^nd^ Quarter       |
|    |   |                              | \$150,000                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount, 3^rd^ Quarter       |
|    |   |                              | \$150,000                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount, 4^th^ Quarter       |
|    |   |                              | \$150,000                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Direct/Reimb. R             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Fund)          |
|    |   |                              | 01FD010603                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Fund 0201                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 10000             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Apportionment Category A    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | GL effects use only two      | Change Document ID (Fund)   |
| .1 | 0 | document numbers for three   | for third transaction from  |
| .6 | 7 | transactions.                | 01FD0106[02]{.underline} to |
|    |   |                              | 01FD0106[03]{.underline} in |
|    |   |                              | expected results and GL     |
|    |   |                              | effects.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Vendor assumed that the      | Add Apportionment Category  |
| .1 | 0 | \$300,000 prior year         | "A" to Inputs and Expected  |
| .6 | 7 | recovery was Category A      | Results.                    |
|    |   | money.                       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Should Inputs, Expected      | Added a general assumption  |
| .1 | 0 | Results and GL entries for   | (#26) to the Test Plan that |
| .6 | 7 | reimbursable fund            | states that all obligations |
|    |   | transactions indicate        | and expenditures are        |
| Et |   | Category (A), or that funds  | [direct]{.underline} unless |
| a  |   | are Reimbursable (R), or     | noted as reimburseable.     |
| l. |   | both?                        |                             |
|    |   |                              | For any test steps that     |
|    |   | Same question applies to     | were marked \"R\" in the GL |
|    |   | test steps FD.1.5, RM.3.1,   | effects, changed the GL     |
|    |   | RM.1.4, RM.2.2, RM.4.6,      | effects to indicate         |
|    |   | RM.8.1, RM.8.2, and PM.7.1   | Category A or B as          |
|    |   | (#5). See also items for     | appropriate.                |
|    |   | PM.16.1 and RM.3.3.          |                             |
|    |   |                              | Updated the Road Map to     |
|    |   |                              | indicate whether            |
|    |   |                              | transactions use D(irect)   |
|    |   |                              | or R(eimbursable) funds.    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Script uses separate         | None.                       |
| .1 | 1 | document nos. for fund 0202  |                             |
| .8 | 2 | allotments to different org. |                             |
|    |   | codes (01FD010803 and        |                             |
|    |   | 01FD0108004), while the      |                             |
|    |   | entry may be input by the    |                             |
|    |   | vendor as one document       |                             |
|    |   | (header) with separate       |                             |
|    |   | lines.                       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Amount cited in Expected     | Changed amount shown in     |
| .1 | 1 | Results #3, allotment for    | Expected Results #3 from    |
| .8 | 2 | org. code 13200, should be   | \$5,000,000 to \$2,500,000. |
|    |   | \$2,500,000, not             |                             |
|    |   | \$5,000,000.                 |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 |                              | Changed the document number |
| .2 | 1 |                              | in the GL effects for the   |
| .1 | 7 |                              | allotment of 0201           |
|    |   |                              | reimbursable funds to org.  |
|    |   |                              | code 11100, object classes  |
|    |   |                              | 2600 and 3100, from         |
|    |   |                              | 01FD020[2]{.underline}02 to |
|    |   |                              | 01FD020[1]{.underline}02.   |
|    |   |                              | This changes the document   |
|    |   |                              | numbers on the Transaction  |
|    |   |                              | Register, as well.          |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | No allotment made to Org.    | *To provide funds for the   |
| .2 | 1 | 10000 to accommodate         | \$12 administrative fee     |
| .1 | 7 | subsequent expenditures,     | paid in RM.13.2, added a    |
|    |   | i.e., \$12 administrative    | \$100 allotment of Category |
|    |   | fee in RM.13.2. See related  | A funds to Organization     |
|    |   | items for RM.6.3 and         | Code 10000 and reduced the  |
|    |   | RM.13.2. See also allotment  | allotment of Category A     |
|    |   | revision being made for item | funds to Organization Code  |
|    |   | PM.8.1.                      | 11200 by the same amount.*  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *[Addition of Category A    |
|    |   |                              | allotment to Org. Code      |
|    |   |                              | 10000]{.underline}*         |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Added the following data   |
|    |   |                              | to Inputs and Expected      |
|    |   |                              | Results #1:*                |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Apportionment Category: A   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Direct/Reimb.: D            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Fund):         |
|    |   |                              | 01FD020101                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | ### Fund: 0201              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 10000             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Object Class 2500           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount allotted: \$100      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Added GL effect, as         |
|    |   |                              | follows:\                   |
|    |   |                              | Doc #: 01FD020101           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Organization: 10000         |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Object Class: 2500          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | FY: 0                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Fund: 0201                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Category: A                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | DR Account: 4510            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | DR Amount: \$100            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | CR Account: 4610            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | CR Amount: \$100            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Reduction of Category A    |
|    |   |                              | allotment to Org. Code      |
|    |   |                              | 11200*                      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Changed the Inputs and     |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results #1 as      |
|    |   |                              | follows:*                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Apportionment Category: A   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Direct/Reimb.: D            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Fund):         |
|    |   |                              | 01FD020101                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | ### Fund: 0201              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 11200             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Object Class 2500*         |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount allotted: \$999,900  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Total 11200: \$5,649,900    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed GL effect from      |
|    |   |                              | \$1,000,000 to \$999,900.   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Summary GL effects for this |
|    |   |                              | test step did not change    |
|    |   |                              | (net effect on GL is zero). |
|    |   |                              | Total allotted to Category  |
|    |   |                              | A did not change.           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | GL entries should debit 4510 | *To provide funds for the   |
| .2 | 1 | instead of 4610, since there | obligation recorded in      |
| .1 | 7 | was no prior allotment of    | PM.8.2, added a \$100,000   |
|    |   | fund 0201, Category B funds. | allotment of Category B     |
|    |   |                              | funds to test step FD.2.1   |
|    |   |                              | and reduced the allotment   |
|    |   |                              | of Category A funds by the  |
|    |   |                              | same amount.*               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *[Addition of Category B    |
|    |   |                              | allotment]{.underline}*     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Added the following data   |
|    |   |                              | to Inputs and Expected      |
|    |   |                              | Results:*                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Apportionment Category: B   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Direct/Reimb.: D            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Fund):         |
|    |   |                              | 01FD020103                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | ### Fund: 0201              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 11100             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Object Class 2600           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount allotted: \$100,000  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Total allotted: \$100,000   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Added GL effect, as         |
|    |   |                              | follows:\                   |
|    |   |                              | Doc #: 01FD020103           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Organization: 11100         |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Object Class: 2600          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | FY: 0                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Fund: 0201                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Category: B                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | DR Account: 4510            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | DR Amount: \$100,000        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | CR Account: 4610            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | CR Amount: \$100,000        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Reduction of Category A    |
|    |   |                              | allotment*                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Changed the Inputs and     |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results as         |
|    |   |                              | follows:*                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Apportionment Category: A   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Direct/Reimb.: D            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Fund):         |
|    |   |                              | 01FD020101                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | ### Fund: 0201              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Total allotted:             |
|    |   |                              | \$10,150,000                |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org. Code 11100             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | *Object Class 2600*         |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount allotted:            |
|    |   |                              | \$1,400,000                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Total 11100: \$4,500,000    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed GL effect from      |
|    |   |                              | \$1,500,000 to \$1,400,000. |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Summary GL effects for this |
|    |   |                              | test step did not change    |
|    |   |                              | (net effect on GL is zero). |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Need to change the Document  | Change Document ID in GL    |
| .3 | 3 | number in the GL effects for | effects #1 from             |
| .3 | 1 | the reprogramming of 0202    | 01FD03030[2]{.underline} to |
|    |   | funds from org. code 13200   | 01FD03030[1]{.underline}.   |
|    |   | from                         |                             |
|    |   | 01FD03030[1]{.underline} to  |                             |
|    |   | 01FD03030[2]{.underline},    |                             |
|    |   | consistent with the Inputs.  |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Three documents were         | Assign number 1. To current |
| .3 | 3 | processed for the rescission | assumption. Add assumption  |
| .4 | 3 | of funds from allotment      | 2. That "Warrant is to be   |
|    |   | through apportionment to     | reduced accordingly."       |
|    |   | appropriation level. The     |                             |
|    |   | warrant was cancelled        |                             |
|    |   | simultaneously.              |                             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   | **Note**: The warrant should |                             |
|    |   | be cancelled even though     |                             |
|    |   | there is no indication in    |                             |
|    |   | the test step description,   |                             |
|    |   | assumption or inputs.        |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | We do not show the correct   | Changed test step           |
| .3 | 3 | accounting for the           | instructions to read as     |
| .4 | 3 | rescission of funds. Per SGL | follows: "Record a          |
|    |   | Accounting Transactions      | rescission of appropriated  |
|    |   | Supplement (T/L S2-99-01),   | funds in fund 0202 in the   |
|    |   | rescissions should be        | amount shown. Entire amount |
|    |   | performed from account 4450  | withdrawn from first        |
|    |   | -- Unapportioned Authority   | quarter."                   |
|    |   | Available. So in order to    |                             |
|    |   | perform a rescission we      | Added the following test    |
|    |   | should back out the funds    | step assumption: "Funds     |
|    |   | from the 4610 allotment      | should first be moved up    |
|    |   | account to the 4510          | through apportionment level |
|    |   | apportionment account, then  | to appropriation level."    |
|    |   | back out the funds from the  |                             |
|    |   | apportionment account to the | Replaced previous GL entry  |
|    |   | 4450 unapportioned authority | with the following entries  |
|    |   | account.                     | (all for \$250,000):        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1.  DR 4610, CR 4510 --     |
|    |   |                              |     Move allotted funds to  |
|    |   |                              |     apportionment level.    |
|    |   |                              |     Category B, org. code   |
|    |   |                              |     13200, object class     |
|    |   |                              |     4100.                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2.  DR 4510, CR 4450 --     |
|    |   |                              |     Move apportioned funds  |
|    |   |                              |     to appropriation level. |
|    |   |                              |     Category B, org. code   |
|    |   |                              |     10000.                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 3.  DR 4450, CR 4392 and DR |
|    |   |                              |     3100, CR 1010 --        |
|    |   |                              |     Rescind the funds at    |
|    |   |                              |     the appropriation level |
|    |   |                              |     and withdraw the cash.  |
|    |   |                              |     Category B, org. code   |
|    |   |                              |     10000.                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed the object class in |
|    |   |                              | the GL effects to 4100,     |
|    |   |                              | consistent with the Inputs. |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 |                              | Deleted the object class    |
| .3 | 3 |                              | from the GL effect for the  |
| .5 | 4 |                              | transfer of funds to 0201,  |
|    |   |                              | consistent with the Inputs, |
|    |   |                              | since the entry is made at  |
|    |   |                              | the apportionment level.    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 0 | The Duns Number is listed as | Duns number should be 9     |
| .1 | 3 | 555666777, and it used to be | digits long. Therefore:     |
| .1 | 6 | 5556667778888.               |                             |
|    |   |                              | In PM.1.1, no change is     |
| PM |   |                              | needed.                     |
| .1 |   |                              |                             |
| .6 |   |                              | In PM.1.6, change Duns      |
|    |   |                              | number in expected results  |
|    |   |                              | from 5556667778888 to       |
|    |   |                              | 555666777.                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In Test Plan setup data,    |
|    |   |                              | change Duns number for      |
|    |   |                              | vendor V-01, Carlton Corp., |
|    |   |                              | from 1112223334444 to       |
|    |   |                              | 111222333.                  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 0 |                              | Deleted standard discount   |
| .1 | 3 |                              | terms from the vendor data. |
| .1 | 6 |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 0 | The TIN is not required for  | No change is required.      |
| .1 | 3 | the second paying address    |                             |
| .2 | 7 | since the TIN belongs to the |                             |
|    |   | vendor and was entered in    |                             |
|    |   | prior test step.             |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 0 | There is no requirement for  | Remove Payment Method from  |
| .1 | 3 | a payment method for the     | the inputs section.         |
| .3 | 8 | establishment of a financial | Expected results do not     |
|    |   | institution. The payment     | require an adjustment.      |
|    |   | method is associated with    |                             |
|    |   | the vendor record.           |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 0 | The expected results shows   | Revise the expected results |
| .1 | 4 | three addresses, but should  | to show two remit to        |
| .6 | 1 | also show the second paying  | addresses:                  |
|    |   | address that was created in  |                             |
|    |   | PM 1.5.                      | Remit to Address #1 P.O.Box |
|    |   |                              | 9079 Rockville, MD 20850    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Remit to Address #2 P.O.Box |
|    |   |                              | 9080 Rockville, MD 20849    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 0 | The "order from" address is  | No change is required.      |
| .1 | 4 | not needed under inputs.     |                             |
| .6 | 1 |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| ## | 0 |                              | Deleted fund type (i.e.,    |
| #  | 4 |                              | reimbursable) from Inputs   |
| CM | 5 |                              | and Expected Results.       |
| .1 |   |                              |                             |
| .1 |   |                              | (Revolving finds do not     |
|    |   |                              | receive an appropriation,   |
|    |   |                              | so their obligations should |
|    |   |                              | be recorded as direct since |
|    |   |                              | there is not an             |
|    |   |                              | appropriation that gets     |
|    |   |                              | reimbursed.)                |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 0 | Telephone number in test     | Change telephone number in  |
| .1 | 4 | script is incomplete.        | inputs and expected results |
| .3 | 9 | Correct telephone number to  | from 234-789 to 234-7890.   |
|    |   | be same as shown in CM.1.2.  |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 0 |                              | Added the Total Amount of   |
| .1 | 4 |                              | \$3800 to the Inputs        |
| .3 | 9 |                              | Section.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 0 | Fund information is missing  | Added fund code 0192 to     |
| .1 | 5 | from Inputs and Expected     | Inputs (only) to this test  |
| .4 | 2 | Results.                     | step and CM.6.1, CM.6.2,    |
|    |   |                              | CM.6.4, and CM.6.7.         |
| E  |   |                              |                             |
| t. |   |                              | Added fund code 0192 to     |
| al |   |                              | Inputs and                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results for        |
|    |   |                              | CM.2.1, CM.2.2, CM.3.1,     |
|    |   |                              | CM.3.2, CM.4.1, CM.5.1,     |
|    |   |                              | CM.5.2, CM.6.5, CM.6.6, and |
|    |   |                              | CM.6.8.                     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Vendor requested             | None. Test script already   |
| .5 | 7 | clarification of the test    | indicates that \$60,000 is  |
| .6 | 8 | inputs. Clarify the fourth   | delivery order              |
|    |   | input by indicating that     | (obligation).               |
|    |   | \$60,000 is the delivery     |                             |
|    |   | order (obligation) "Amount". |                             |
|    |   | Update expected results as   |                             |
|    |   | well.                        |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | The reference to TC-FD.5.8   | Replaced reference to       |
| .5 | 8 | -- TC.FD.5.12 in the         | specific test steps (that   |
| .7 | 0 | instructions for this test   | may be entered from a       |
|    |   | step are now incorrect.      | separate PC) in the test    |
|    |   |                              | step instructions with      |
|    |   |                              | reference to "at least one  |
|    |   |                              | Cycle 2 transaction" in the |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results.           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| F  | 0 | Reference to GSA "Personal   | Changed test step           |
| D. | 8 | Property Center" in the      | instructions and Expected   |
| 5. | 1 | instructions for this test   | Results to refer to GSA     |
| 10 |   | step is obsolete.            | Federal Supply Service,     |
|    |   |                              | instead of GSA Personal     |
|    |   |                              | Property Center, consistent |
|    |   |                              | with vendor setup data.     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Under inputs, why is "Annual | Field is required. No       |
| .7 | 8 | limitation NTE" of \$15,000  | change needed.              |
| .2 | 8 | there?                       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | The test step indicates that | Added the following         |
| .7 | 8 | Rec-01 is the recipient of   | assumption to this test     |
| .2 | 8 | the grant, but does not note | step: "Grant recipient,     |
|    |   | that Rec-01 has to be set up | Educational Development,    |
|    |   | as a vendor prior to         | must first be added to the  |
|    |   | recording the grant          | vendor file."               |
|    |   | obligation.                  |                             |
|    |   |                              | Add the following vendor    |
|    |   |                              | data to Inputs and Expected |
|    |   |                              | Results:                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Payment Method: Check       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Remit to address:           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 7222 Ocean Drive            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Hollywood, FL 33003         |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | TIN: 07-2955667             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Vendor Type: Commercial     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | VENDOR requested             | In inputs and expected      |
| .7 | 9 | clarification of the test    | results, change the title   |
| .3 | 0 | inputs.                      | of document number          |
|    |   |                              | 02FD050601 from Document ID |
|    |   |                              | (Delivery Order) to         |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Obligation)    |
|    |   |                              | and the title of document   |
|    |   |                              | number 02FD070301 from      |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Invoice) to    |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (Accrual).      |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 0 | Test cites "invoice" amount  | Changed "Invoice amount" to |
| .7 | 9 | instead of goods receipt or  | "Accrual amount" in Inputs  |
| .3 | 0 | accrual amount, in error.    | and Expected Results. Also, |
|    |   |                              | changed sentence in         |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results to cite    |
|    |   |                              | accrual instead of delivery |
|    |   |                              | order.                      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Change "Document ID         |
|    |   |                              | (Contract)" to "Document ID |
|    |   |                              | (Delivery Order)" in Inputs |
|    |   |                              | and Expected Results.       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 0 | ALC is required for OPAC     | No change is required.      |
| .1 | 9 | billings but no input values |                             |
| .4 | 2 | are provided                 |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 0 | The input statement needs    | Replace the current dates   |
| .3 | 9 | additional information about | in inputs and expected      |
| .3 | 7 | the first billing date;      | results with the following: |
|    |   | inputs should read, "first   |                             |
|    |   | billing date is 10/15/99".   | First Billing Date 10/15/99 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   | The billing invoice number   | First Payment Due Date      |
|    |   | should be system generated   | 11/15/99                    |
|    |   | and not included as a data   |                             |
|    |   | input.                       | Final Payment Billing Date  |
|    |   |                              | 2/15/00                     |
|    |   | The document ID (Bill)       |                             |
|    |   | should be included in the    | Final Payment Due Date      |
|    |   | expected results rather than | 3/15/00                     |
|    |   | the invoice number.          |                             |
|    |   |                              | Delete Invoice Number from  |
|    |   |                              | inputs, since it would be   |
|    |   |                              | system generated. Change    |
|    |   |                              | title in expected results   |
|    |   |                              | from "Invoice Number" to    |
|    |   |                              | "Customer Bill Number," to  |
|    |   |                              | be consistent with RM.3.2.  |
|    |   |                              | Add "(system generated)"    |
|    |   |                              | after the Customer Bill     |
|    |   |                              | Number "4-Instal" in the    |
|    |   |                              | expected results.           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 0 |                              | Added fund type of "Direct" |
| .3 | 9 |                              | to Inputs and Expected      |
| .3 | 7 |                              | Results.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 |                              | Changed the Document number |
| .6 | 0 |                              | in GL effects 1 to 04RM     |
| .1 | 5 |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | Dependencies include RM.4.3, | Deleted TC-RM.4.3 from      |
| .6 | 0 | although this test step      | dependencies list.          |
| .2 | 6 | relates to a bill for which  |                             |
|    |   | payment was already          |                             |
|    |   | received, not a pending OPAC |                             |
|    |   | billing.                     |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 1 | Inputs and Expected Results  | Replaced "Modules" with     |
| .1 | 0 | cite "Modules," while        | "Functions" in Inputs and   |
| .1 | 7 | Instructions were changed to | Expected Results. Also,     |
|    |   | cite "Functions."            | added "(Cycle 2)" after the |
|    |   |                              | 10/15/99 period of time     |
|    |   |                              | specified in Inputs and     |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results.           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 1 | Expected Results are         | [Revised Inputs to          |
| .1 | 0 | unclear.                     | read]{.underline}:          |
| .2 | 8 |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Audit Trail: Each           |
|    |   |                              | transaction uniquely        |
|    |   |                              | identified                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Period of Time: 10/15/99    |
|    |   |                              | (Cycle 2)                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | [Revised Expected Results   |
|    |   |                              | to read]{.underline}:       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Verify That: A transaction  |
|    |   |                              | register is produced for    |
|    |   |                              | Cycle 2 that contains the   |
|    |   |                              | minimum data elements       |
|    |   |                              | required by the JFMIP       |
|    |   |                              | Qualification Test Plan.    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Audit Trail: Each           |
|    |   |                              | transaction uniquely        |
|    |   |                              | identified                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Period of Time: 10/15/99    |
|    |   |                              | (Cycle 2)                   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | It is unclear why both a     | Delete Customer Bill Number |
| .3 | 0 | document ID (Bill) number    | from inputs, since it would |
| .2 | 9 | and a Customer Bill Number   | be system generated. Add    |
|    |   | are provided as inputs.      | "(system generated)" after  |
|    |   | Also, the expected results   | the Customer Bill Number    |
|    |   | do not cite the document ID  | "3" in the expected         |
|    |   | (Bill) Number. Customer bill | results.                    |
|    |   | number is 3-Penalty, but the |                             |
|    |   | account receivable is not    | No change to expected       |
|    |   | for a penalty. Also, because | results for Document ID     |
|    |   | of the last assumption       | (Bill) number. It is shown  |
|    |   | stating "Bill to be mailed." | in the GL effects section   |
|    |   | vendors have inquired as to  | of expected results.        |
|    |   | whether a bill should be     | Changed customer bill       |
|    |   | generated in this test step. | number from "3-Penalty" to  |
|    |   |                              | "3" in Inputs and Expected  |
|    |   |                              | Results.                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Deleted the last assumption |
|    |   |                              | stating "Bill to be         |
|    |   |                              | mailed." (Bill is not to be |
|    |   |                              | generated, even though a    |
|    |   |                              | dunning letter will be      |
|    |   |                              | produced in test step       |
|    |   |                              | RM.10.3 for this A/R. Bill  |
|    |   |                              | generation is tested        |
|    |   |                              | separately in RM.6.3, for   |
|    |   |                              | another A/R.)               |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | RM.4.4 is missing from       | Added TC-RM.4.4 to          |
| .4 | 1 | dependencies list.           | dependencies list.          |
| .6 | 3 |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | Customer bill (invoice)      | Delete Invoice Number from  |
| .6 | 1 | number should be system      | inputs, since it would be   |
| .3 | 5 | generated.                   | system generated. Change    |
|    |   |                              | title in expected results   |
|    |   | Document ID (Bill) is        | from "Invoice Number" to    |
|    |   | missing from expected        | "Customer Bill Number," to  |
|    |   | results.                     | be consistent with RM.3.2.  |
|    |   |                              | Add "(optional)" after the  |
|    |   |                              | Customer Bill Number "3" in |
|    |   |                              | the expected results.       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | No change to expected       |
|    |   |                              | results for Document ID     |
|    |   |                              | (Bill) number. It is shown  |
|    |   |                              | in the GL effects section   |
|    |   |                              | of expected results.        |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | Assumptions are confusing.   | Revise assumptions to read  |
| .6 | 1 | Expected results should      | as follows:                 |
| .3 | 5 | include reference to fund.   |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1)  Previous transactions   |
|    |   |                              |     also occurred in the    |
|    |   |                              |     current fiscal year and |
|    |   |                              |     have already been       |
|    |   |                              |     recorded.               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2)  A customer overpaid a   |
|    |   |                              |     bill because he was     |
|    |   |                              |     overcharged. Then, we   |
|    |   |                              |     sent a refund for more  |
|    |   |                              |     than what was due.      |
|    |   |                              |     Customer owes the       |
|    |   |                              |     difference.             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 3)  Remittance portion of   |
|    |   |                              |     bill should include a   |
|    |   |                              |     line item "deposit into |
|    |   |                              |     Fund 0201".             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 4)  Due to the agency       |
|    |   |                              |     error, interest will    |
|    |   |                              |     not be assessed on this |
|    |   |                              |     account.                |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | No need to add fund 0201 to |
|    |   |                              | expected results because it |
|    |   |                              | is already shown in the GL  |
|    |   |                              | effects section.            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Delete Invoice Number from  |
|    |   |                              | inputs, since it would be   |
|    |   |                              | system generated. Change    |
|    |   |                              | title in expected results   |
|    |   |                              | from "Invoice Number" to    |
|    |   |                              | "Customer Bill Number," to  |
|    |   |                              | be consistent with RM.3.2.  |
|    |   |                              | Add "(system generated)"    |
|    |   |                              | after the Customer Bill     |
|    |   |                              | Number "2" in the expected  |
|    |   |                              | results.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | We never assigned an         | Organization code 10000     |
| .6 | 1 | organization code or object  | added to Inputs, Expected   |
| .3 | 5 | class to the refund          | Results and GL effects.     |
|    |   | overpayment billed to David  |                             |
|    |   | Wayne in this test step. See |                             |
|    |   | also items for RM.13.2 and   |                             |
|    |   | FD.2.1.                      |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 1 | Fund not indicated in Inputs | Added fund 0192 and object  |
| .3 | 2 | section. The object class in | class 3113 (optional) to    |
| .2 | 7 | the Inputs section should be | the Inputs and Expected     |
|    |   | 3112.                        | Results.                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In the Test Plan setup      |
|    |   |                              | data, added object class    |
|    |   |                              | 3113, Depreciation on       |
|    |   |                              | Capital Equipment.          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | No change to the GL         |
|    |   |                              | effects, since object class |
|    |   |                              | is optional.                |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 1 | Expected results have been   | Number existing assumptions |
| .5 | 3 | rounded to result in a whole | as 1. And 2. Add assumption |
| .2 | 4 | dollar amount for the test   | 3, "Refer to Appendix B of  |
|    |   | step. This usually generates | the Qualification Test Plan |
| CM |   | a series of questions on one | for the percentage          |
| .6 |   | or 2 cent rounding           | allocations and degree of   |
| .4 |   | discrepancies.               | precision that was used to  |
|    |   |                              | allocate indirect costs.    |
| CM |   |                              | Rounding discrepancies of 1 |
| .6 |   |                              | cent from expected results  |
| .5 |   |                              | are acceptable."            |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 1 | Test step CM.1.4 is missing  | Added CM.1.4 to             |
| .5 | 3 | from the dependencies list.  | dependencies list, prior to |
| .2 | 4 |                              | CM.5.1.                     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CM | 1 | First sentence of Expected   | Inserted the word "and"     |
| .6 | 4 | Results has a typo.          | between the words "direct"  |
| .7 | 1 |                              | and "indirect" in the first |
|    |   |                              | sentence of the Expected    |
|    |   |                              | Results.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Several Vendors have stated  | Add assumption that "If     |
| .2 | 4 | that the real tolerance      | tolerance is built into     |
| .3 | 6 | check occurs at the point of | receiving report to         |
|    |   | recording the receiving      | obligation rather than      |
| PM |   | report not the invoice since | invoice to obligation, than |
| .2 |   | invoice tracking is not an   | acceptance of goods         |
| .5 |   | SGL event.                   | recorded in PM.2.5 should   |
|    |   |                              | initially be attempted at   |
|    |   |                              | \$45,055 and result in      |
|    |   |                              | rejection prior to          |
|    |   |                              | executing PM.2.5 as         |
|    |   |                              | written."                   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Invoice \# Clarification     | Add assumption to the test  |
| .2 | 4 |                              | plan, "For invoice          |
| .4 | 7 |                              | processing transactions,    |
|    |   |                              | the Document ID provided in |
|    |   |                              | the inputs also serves as   |
|    |   |                              | the vendor invoice ID       |
|    |   |                              | unless otherwise            |
|    |   |                              | specified."                 |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Not noted in test step that  | *Deleted assumption that    |
| .2 | 4 | (prior) invoice will need to | "Invoice processed for      |
| .5 | 8 | be authorized for payment in | payment when 3-way match    |
|    |   | this test step.              | occurs." Replaced with the  |
|    |   |                              | following 2 assumptions:*   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1.  3-way match has         |
|    |   |                              |     occurred.               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2.  Refer to general        |
|    |   |                              |     assumption #25 in the   |
|    |   |                              |     test plan.              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Added Goods Receipt Date of |
|    |   |                              | 10/18/99 to Expected        |
|    |   |                              | Results, consistent with    |
|    |   |                              | Inputs.                     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Added Invoice Due Date of   |
|    |   |                              | 11/17/99 to Expected        |
|    |   |                              | Results.                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In Inputs and Expected      |
|    |   |                              | Results, changed the        |
|    |   |                              | Document number of the      |
|    |   |                              | obligation to 02FD050401.   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | There is an inconsistency    | Confirmed that test script  |
| .3 | 4 | between the test script and  | Document ID for the         |
| .1 | 9 | the Road Map. The test       | receiving report is         |
|    |   | script for the Engineering   | 04PM030102, not 04PM030103, |
|    |   | Services uses a document ID  | in Inputs and in Expected   |
|    |   | for the receiving report of  | Results.                    |
|    |   | 04PM030103. However, the     |                             |
|    |   | Road Map uses an ID of       | Deleted Document ID for     |
|    |   | 04PM030102.                  | Receiving Report from       |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results for        |
|    |   |                              | invoice, since it doesn't   |
|    |   |                              | apply.                      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Deleted standard discount   |
|    |   |                              | terms from vendor V-01      |
|    |   |                              | (Carlton) setup data.       |
|    |   |                              | Replaced with "N/A."        |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Incorrect test step is noted | In Inputs and Expected      |
| .3 | 5 | as dependency.               | Results, added dollar       |
| .4 | 4 |                              | amounts of \$9000 for zip   |
|    |   |                              | drive and \$50,000 for      |
|    |   |                              | engineering services.       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | The inputs include a USED ID | Revise inputs to reflect    |
| .4 | 5 | designated as clerk level    | the following two User      |
| .2 | 8 | access. It is unclear        | ID's:                       |
|    |   | whether this is the          |                             |
|    |   | authorized ID for the        | User ID #1 Clerk            |
|    |   | override or the initial      |                             |
|    |   | entry/unauthorized ID.       | User ID #2 Supervisor       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Revise expected results to  |
|    |   |                              | read:                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | **Verify That:**            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1.  **Clerk's attempt to    |
|    |   |                              |     increase the obligation |
|    |   |                              |     is unsuccessful.**      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2.  **Supervisor posts the  |
|    |   |                              |     transaction.**          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | (Then show the transaction  |
|    |   |                              | detail already in the       |
|    |   |                              | expected results)           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Test step indicates that     | Added assumption to test    |
| .4 | 6 | vendor lost the payment, but | step that: "Payment is made |
| .4 | 0 | that would be unlikely with  | by Treasury check."         |
|    |   | a payment made by EFT.       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | PM.5.3 is missing from       | Added TC-PM.5.3 to          |
| .6 | 6 | dependencies list.           | dependencies list. Put      |
| .1 | 9 |                              | dependency test steps in    |
|    |   |                              | numerical order (same as    |
|    |   |                              | order of occurrence).       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Not clear whether funds      | Number the existing         |
| .6 | 7 | should be re-obligated.      | assumption as number 1. Add |
| .2 | 2 | Also, it is associated       | assumption 2.that "Goods    |
|    |   | unclear whether the related  | will not be re-ordered;     |
|    |   | invoice should be closed.    | re-establish funds          |
|    |   |                              | available and close related |
|    |   |                              | invoice."                   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Expected results, first      | In the expected results for |
| .6 | 7 | payment amount line item s/b | the 3^rd^ payment (of paper |
| .2 | 2 | \$2000 rather than \$1500.   | clips), change the Document |
|    |   | Also, the expected results   | ID (Payment) from           |
|    |   | for the 3^rd^ payment, the   | 04PM050401 to 04PM060101.   |
|    |   | "Document ID (Payment)"      |                             |
|    |   | should be 04PM0601.          | The 1^st^ payment amount    |
|    |   |                              | (for pencils) is correct at |
|    |   |                              | \$1500. No change is        |
|    |   |                              | needed.                     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Test step is unclear. GL     | Changed first assumption    |
| .6 | 7 | entry reflects reversal of   | from "Of the 4 items in     |
| .2 | 2 | accrual, but test step       | this invoice, 2 are paid on |
|    |   | instructions indicate that   | 11/17, 1 on 11/30, and one  |
|    |   | warehoused payment is being  | is excluded because date    |
|    |   | cancelled because the date   | was entered incorrectly."   |
|    |   | was entered incorrectly.     | To "Payment is cancelled    |
|    |   | Vendor removed the invoice   | upon return of goods."      |
|    |   | from the schedule, but did   |                             |
|    |   | not reverse the accrual.     |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | The payment due dates are    | None. Goods are not yet     |
| .8 | 7 | missing from the input and   | received and invoice is not |
| .1 | 4 | the expected results.        | yet approved, so payment    |
|    |   |                              | due dates (which would only |
|    |   |                              | be shown in expected        |
|    |   |                              | results, since they would   |
|    |   |                              | be calculated by the        |
|    |   |                              | system) should not be shown |
|    |   |                              | here.                       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | The test requires the        | In test step inputs and     |
| .8 | 7 | posting of an invoice to     | expected results, change    |
| .1 | 4 | object class 2520. However,  | object class from 2520 to   |
|    |   | there was no allotment set   | 2610 and change the         |
|    |   | up for 2520 in Fund 0201,    | description of goods from   |
|    |   | Category B.                  | vending services to vending |
|    |   |                              | machine.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | The receiving report for     | In test step inputs,        |
| .8 | 7 | vending services shows a     | expected results and GL     |
| .2 | 6 | posting to object code 2520. | effects, change the object  |
|    |   | However, no funds were       | class from 2520 to 2610 and |
|    |   | allocated to this fund,      | change the description of   |
|    |   | organization, object code    | goods from vending services |
|    |   | string.                      | to vending machine. (May    |
|    |   |                              | want to do a global search  |
|    |   | The payment due dates are    | and replace on vendor       |
|    |   | missing from the expected    | services.) Revise Status of |
|    |   | results.                     | Funds reporting             |
|    |   |                              | accordingly.                |
|    |   | Also, receiving report       |                             |
|    |   | information listed at end of | Assign a number to each     |
|    |   | inputs can be deleted by     | item in inputs (e.g, 1 for  |
|    |   | moving the payment due date  | receiver header, 1.1 for    |
|    |   | to front.                    | first receiver line, etc.). |
|    |   |                              | Assign numbers to each      |
|    |   | Delete duplicate info at end | expected result, consistent |
|    |   | of inputs and incorporate    | with the input data. Review |
|    |   | due date into first part of  | test script or database for |
|    |   | inputs and expected results. | other instances where this  |
|    |   |                              | is needed. See also PM.13.1 |
|    |   | In the inputs, the document  | and RM.8.1.                 |
|    |   | number for Line 1 - RR1 is   |                             |
|    |   | different than the document  | No change here. Payment due |
|    |   | number of RR1 header.        | dates are shown in the      |
|    |   |                              | expected results for the    |
|    |   | The document number for Line | payment authorizations, as  |
|    |   | 1 - RR2 is different than    | appropriate.                |
|    |   | the document number of RR2   |                             |
|    |   | header.                      | Delete payment due dates    |
|    |   |                              | from the inputs related to  |
|    |   |                              | payment authorizations.     |
|    |   |                              | They belong in only         |
|    |   |                              | expected results, since     |
|    |   |                              | they will be calculated by  |
|    |   |                              | the system.                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | No change here. Info. at    |
|    |   |                              | the end of inputs is        |
|    |   |                              | related to payment          |
|    |   |                              | authorizations, which are   |
|    |   |                              | separate actions. Due dates |
|    |   |                              | are being deleted from      |
|    |   |                              | inputs.                     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Remove document ID's at the |
|    |   |                              | receiver line level.        |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 |                              | Added assumption that:      |
| .8 | 7 |                              | "This invoice is not to be  |
| .2 | 6 |                              | grouped with other invoices |
|    |   |                              | for consolidated payment to |
|    |   |                              | the vendor."                |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Obligation not specifically  | Revise test step            |
| .8 | 8 | stated as being closed.      | assumptions to read as      |
| .3 | 1 |                              | follows:                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1.  Damaged goods will be   |
|    |   |                              |     returned to the vendor. |
|    |   |                              |     Since the goods will    |
|    |   |                              |     not be replaced, the    |
|    |   |                              |     obligation should be    |
|    |   |                              |     closed to make funds    |
|    |   |                              |     available for other     |
|    |   |                              |     uses.                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2.  Invoice can be split by |
|    |   |                              |     line items.             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Revise "Verify That:"       |
|    |   |                              | sentence in expected        |
|    |   |                              | results to read "Payment    |
|    |   |                              | for the following item is   |
|    |   |                              | cancelled and the           |
|    |   |                              | obligation and              |
|    |   |                              | receipt/accrual are         |
|    |   |                              | reversed."                  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Test step GL entry shows     | Changed GL entry fund       |
| .8 | 8 | incorrect fund category.     | category from A to B. Also, |
| .3 | 1 |                              | added amounts for each item |
|    |   |                              | in Inputs and Expected      |
|    |   |                              | Results: coffee \$150,      |
|    |   |                              | vending services \$1500,    |
|    |   |                              | milk \$350 and coffee       |
|    |   |                              | machine \$200               |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 1 | Intent of test step is to    | Added payment amount of     |
| .8 | 8 | review payment information,  | \$200 to Inputs and         |
| .4 | 3 | yet payment amount is not    | Expected Results.           |
|    |   | shown in Inputs and Expected |                             |
|    |   | Results.                     |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 1 | SGL entries are mis-numbered | See PM.8.2.                 |
| M. | 8 |                              |                             |
| 13 | 9 |                              |                             |
| .1 |   |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 1 | Vendors requested            | Language in the expected    |
| M. | 9 | clarification whether grant  | results should be changed   |
| 13 | 3 | payment is warehoused or     | from "made" to "warehoused" |
| .2 |   | disbursed because of         | for consistency.            |
|    |   | language in the expected     |                             |
|    |   | results.                     |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 1 | GL entry cites incorrect     | In GL effect, changed fund  |
| M. | 9 | fund and fund category.      | from 0201 to 0202 and       |
| 13 | 3 |                              | changed fund category from  |
| .2 |   |                              | A to B.                     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 1 | Org. code in GL effects for  | The org code in GL effects  |
| M. | 9 | receivable only should be    | #4 should be changed from   |
| 16 | 4 | 10000 instead of 11100,      | 11100 to                    |
| .1 |   | consistent with previous     | [none]{.underline}, to be   |
|    |   | USDACOMM reimbursable        | consistent with other       |
|    |   | agreement entries.           | USDACOMM reimbursable       |
|    |   |                              | entries. Related Status of  |
|    |   | In addition, fund 201R was   | Funds Reporting of actual   |
|    |   | used because the transaction | reimbursements earned and   |
|    |   | is reimbursable. The         | unfilled customer orders in |
|    |   | apportionment category is    | fund 0201R should change    |
|    |   | shown correctly in the       | accordingly.                |
|    |   | general ledger effects.      |                             |
|    |   |                              | Note that the org. code in  |
|    |   |                              | GL effects #1, which        |
|    |   |                              | records the expenditure,    |
|    |   |                              | should remain as 11100.     |
|    |   |                              | This is consistent with the |
|    |   |                              | org. code used for the      |
|    |   |                              | allotment of related funds  |
|    |   |                              | in FD.2.1. Status of Funds  |
|    |   |                              | and SF133 reporting of this |
|    |   |                              | expenditure should be       |
|    |   |                              | corrected to reflect it in  |
|    |   |                              | fund 0201R instead of       |
|    |   |                              | 0201A.                      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Apportionment category      |
|    |   |                              | should be changed from R to |
|    |   |                              | A. See related General      |
|    |   |                              | item.                       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 1 | Direct/Reimbursable is shown | Deleted apportionment       |
| M. | 9 | in Inputs and Expected       | category information from   |
| 16 | 4 | Results and GL entries as a  | Inputs. Added Direct/Reimb  |
| .1 |   | fund category, when it is    | value of "R" to Inputs.     |
|    |   | not.                         | Changed fund category in GL |
|    |   |                              | effects from "R" to "A."    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Revise sub-headings in      |
|    |   |                              | Inputs and Expected Results |
|    |   |                              | [from]{.underline} Receipt, |
|    |   |                              | Invoice, Payment and        |
|    |   |                              | Customer [to]{.underline}   |
|    |   |                              | Obligation/ Receipt,        |
|    |   |                              | Invoice Receipt, Payment    |
|    |   |                              | Authorization and Customer  |
|    |   |                              | Billing.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | It is difficult to verify    | See PM.8.2                  |
| .8 | 9 | the expected results. The    |                             |
| .1 | 7 | bill ID against which the    | Add the Document ID (Bill)  |
|    |   | collections are to be        | to each of the three        |
|    |   | applied should be included   | expected results.           |
|    |   | as an element of the         |                             |
|    |   | expected results to ensure   |                             |
|    |   | that software can apply      |                             |
|    |   | payments correctly. Also     |                             |
|    |   | input document numbers are   |                             |
|    |   | missing from the expected    |                             |
|    |   | results for transactions 1   |                             |
|    |   | and 2.                       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 1 | Test steps RM.1.4 and RM.2.2 | Added test steps TC-RM.1.4  |
| .8 | 9 | are missing from             | and TC-RM.2.2 to            |
| .1 | 7 | dependencies list.           | dependencies list.          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed Document number for |
|    |   |                              | first GL effect from        |
|    |   |                              | 04RM01010[2]{.underline} to |
|    |   |                              | 04RM08010[1]{.underline},   |
|    |   |                              | consistent with Inputs.     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 | Expected results include     | None. Document ID numbers   |
| .8 | 0 | fund but do not include the  | are reflected in GL effects |
| .4 | 2 | document ID number (which    | section of expected         |
|    |   | contains fund).              | results.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | The expected results for     | Change expected results for |
| .7 | 1 | this test step display       | PM.7.1 to add a column      |
| .1 | 2 | incorrect document numbers.  | entitled "Invoice #". List  |
|    |   | The invoice numbers should   | the following invoice       |
|    |   | be part of the expected      | numbers in this column:     |
|    |   | results because the invoice  |                             |
|    |   | number is what should appear | 04PM020101                  |
|    |   | on the disbursement file     |                             |
|    |   | when the Treasury schedule   | 04PM040101                  |
|    |   | is created.                  |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM050101\*                |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM050201\*\*              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM080102ABCDEFGHIJ        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM130202                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM160102                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | \*List amount as \$1500 in  |
|    |   |                              | 3^rd^ column.               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | \*\*List amount as \$500 in |
|    |   |                              | 3^rd^ column.               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Change identifying document |
|    |   |                              | numbers and amounts in GL   |
|    |   |                              | effects accordingly. Add    |
|    |   |                              | document number title       |
|    |   |                              | "Invoice" prior to the      |
|    |   |                              | actual number, consistent   |
|    |   |                              | with PM.7.4.                |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 2 | It is not explicit that      | In PM.7.1 and PM.6.5,       |
| M. | 1 | recording the SGL            | number the existing         |
| 7. | 2 | transaction to 2120 must be  | assumption as number 1. Add |
| 1, |   | automated.                   | assumption 2. that "SGL     |
| PM |   |                              | entry to record             |
| .6 |   |                              | disbursements in transit    |
| .5 |   |                              | should be a                 |
|    |   |                              | system-generated entry      |
|    |   |                              | requiring no manual         |
|    |   |                              | intervention."              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In PM.7.4, add assumption   |
|    |   |                              | 3. That "SGL entry to       |
|    |   |                              | record disbursements in     |
|    |   |                              | transit should be a         |
|    |   |                              | system-generated entry      |
|    |   |                              | requiring no manual         |
|    |   |                              | intervention."              |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | When we recorded the expense | Changed the account         |
| .7 | 1 | in PM.16.1 we debited        | credited for the \$20       |
| .1 | 2 | account 6500, but when we    | discount from 6100 to 6500. |
|    |   | record the discount in       |                             |
|    |   | PM.7.1 we credit account     | Changed the fund in GL      |
|    |   | 6100.                        | effect #5, for the \$10,000 |
|    |   |                              | payment from PM.13.2, from  |
|    |   |                              | 0201 Category A to 0202     |
|    |   |                              | Category B.                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Deleted standard discount   |
|    |   |                              | terms from vendor V-03      |
|    |   |                              | (JFK) setup data. Replaced  |
|    |   |                              | with "N/A."                 |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | Fund Category in GL effects  | Correct Fund Category in GL |
| .6 | 1 | 4 and 5 should be B, not A.  | effects accordingly.        |
| .5 | 8 |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Also, in PM.7.1, change     |
|    |   |                              | Category from A to B in GL  |
|    |   |                              | effects #4 and 5. This is   |
|    |   |                              | consistent with PM.8.2.     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | VENDOR processed this        | Revised Test Plan setup     |
| .7 | 2 | transaction using an EFT     | data to indicate that the   |
| .3 | 1 | payment, consistent with the | vendor can be paid by both  |
|    |   | vendor setup data. However,  | EFT and paper checks. EFT   |
|    |   | the test step requires       | type (CCD or CTX)           |
|    |   | reissuance through a manual  | specified.                  |
|    |   | check.                       |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed Inputs and Expected |
|    |   |                              | Results to cite 04PM040401  |
|    |   |                              | as the Document ID for the  |
|    |   |                              | original Payment.           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed Inputs, Expected    |
|    |   |                              | Results and GL effects to   |
|    |   |                              | cite 05PM070301 as the      |
|    |   |                              | Document ID for the         |
|    |   |                              | re-issued Payment.          |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 2 | Vendors may need to set up   | Added assumption that       |
| M. | 2 | vendor V-02 as a customer    | "Vendor V-02, AHS, Inc.,    |
| 12 | 8 | for this test step.          | may now need to be set up   |
| .3 |   |                              | as a customer.              |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Organization code for        | No organization code (or    |
| M. | 3 | receipt of \$1,000 donation  | "None") should be specified |
| 12 | 1 | in not included in general   | for this and all other      |
| .1 |   | ledger effects               | accounts receivable         |
|    |   |                              | transactions.               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Add assumption to the test  |
|    |   |                              | plan, "If the software      |
|    |   |                              | requires a value in the     |
|    |   |                              | organization account code   |
|    |   |                              | field, but none is          |
|    |   |                              | specified in the inputs,    |
|    |   |                              | then assume a 10000         |
|    |   |                              | organization code value."   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Also, add assumption to the |
|    |   |                              | test plan, "For status of   |
|    |   |                              | funds reporting purposes,   |
|    |   |                              | if an organization code is  |
|    |   |                              | not specified in a test     |
|    |   |                              | step, reflect such amounts  |
|    |   |                              | in organization 10000."     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Fund code 3888 is            | Revised Inputs #1 to        |
| M. | 3 | incorrectly shown as the     | indicate that the Fund is   |
| 12 | 1 | Description in Inputs #1.    | 3888 and the Description is |
| .1 |   |                              | Fines-Misc. Receipts. Added |
|    |   |                              | Fund 0201 to Inputs #2.     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Instructions incorrectly     | Changed "accounts" to       |
| M. | 3 | indicate that more than one  | "account" in test step      |
| 13 | 3 | account is to be marked for  | instructions.               |
| .1 |   | referral to Treasury.        |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | Delete \$240 credit memo     | Delete offsetting entries   |
| .7 | 3 | lines from Expected Results. | for \$240 from expected     |
| .4 | 4 | (Should be shown in PM.15.1  | results.                    |
|    |   | only.)                       |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | The invoice numbers should   | Change expected results for |
| .7 | 3 | be part of the expected      | PM.7.4 to add a column      |
| .4 | 4 | results because the invoice  | entitled "Invoice #". List  |
|    |   | number is what should appear | the following invoice       |
|    |   | on the disbursement file     | numbers in this column:     |
|    |   | when the Treasury schedule   |                             |
|    |   | is created.                  | 04PM030101                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM100101                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04PM040101                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04CM020301                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 04CM020401                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Change identifying document |
|    |   |                              | numbers in the GL effects   |
|    |   |                              | accordingly. Change         |
|    |   |                              | document number title from  |
|    |   |                              | "Payment" to "Invoice."     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Also, change (second) GL    |
|    |   |                              | effects document numbers    |
|    |   |                              | for all entries to          |
|    |   |                              | 05PM070401, consistent with |
|    |   |                              | what was done in PM.7.1.    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| PM | 2 | JMK vendor is set up for ACH | In Expected Results, added  |
| .7 | 3 | payment. In the test step it | the \$240 payment from      |
| .4 | 4 | states that the accounts     | PM.6.1 and the (negative)   |
|    |   | payable is reduced by the    | \$240 offset from           |
|    |   | check amount. Should this be | PM.12.1/12.2 to the payment |
|    |   | a check or ACH payment?      | list. Add these test steps  |
|    |   |                              | to the dependencies list,   |
|    |   |                              | as well.                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Replaced the word "check"   |
|    |   |                              | in the Expected Results     |
|    |   |                              | sentence with the word      |
|    |   |                              | "payment."                  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 2 | The test step instructions   | Revise the test step        |
| M. | 3 | state to produce a report    | instructions to read        |
| 15 | 8 | that lists all payments      | "Review all payment         |
| .1 |   | forwarded to Treasury for    | activity in November. This  |
|    |   | disbursement. However, the   | report/query should include |
|    |   | expected results list a      | all payments made on        |
|    |   | payment offset by a credit   | 11/17/99 and scheduled on   |
|    |   | memo (\$240). These two are  | 11/26/99, as well as credit |
|    |   | in conflict, as the          | memos and payments offset." |
|    |   | payment/credit would not be  |                             |
|    |   | sent to Treasury, so it      |                             |
|    |   | should not appear on the     |                             |
|    |   | requested report.            |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 2 | The instructions for this    | Added assumption to test    |
| M. | 3 | report/query are not         | step that: "This            |
| 15 | 8 | completely clear. (Relates   | report/query is intended to |
| .1 |   | to PM.7.1 and PM.7.4.) One   | support the preparation of  |
|    |   | issue is the inclusion of    | the SF-224."                |
|    |   | the \$240 credit memo        |                             |
|    |   | offset.                      | In Expected Results, added  |
|    |   |                              | the \$240 payment from      |
|    |   |                              | PM.6.1 and the (negative)   |
|    |   |                              | \$240 offset from PM.12.2   |
|    |   |                              | to the payment list.        |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 2 |                              | Changed the Document number |
| .2 | 4 |                              | in the GL effects for the   |
| .2 |   |                              | allotment of 0203 Category  |
|    |   |                              | B funds from                |
|    |   |                              | 01FD02020[1]{.underline} to |
|    |   |                              | 01FD02020[2]{.underline}.   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 | The test step tests the      | Number the current          |
| .4 | 4 | ability to post an           | assumption as number 1. Add |
| .1 | 0 | assessment of penalty        | assumption 2. That "Penalty |
|    |   | against a receivable.        | is to be recorded as an     |
|    |   | However, since each entry    | adjustment to the original  |
|    |   | into the system creates a    | bill."                      |
|    |   | unique document number, the  |                             |
|    |   | document for the penalty     | In inputs and expected      |
|    |   | does not readily link to the | results, show Reference     |
|    |   | original receivable, which   | Document ID of 03RM030201   |
|    |   | is a requirement. The        | and Document ID (Bill) of   |
|    |   | document number provided in  | 06RM040101. Leave Document  |
|    |   | the inputs in a different    | ID of 06RM040101 in GL      |
|    |   | number than the document     | effects. This is consistent |
|    |   | number for the input of the  | with RM.7.1.                |
|    |   | orginal receivable. It is    |                             |
|    |   | unclear whether the          | Delete input section on     |
|    |   | expectation is to create a   | \$90 assessment of interest |
|    |   | new receivable or to create  | on USDACOMM.                |
|    |   | a new line item on the       |                             |
|    |   | original receivable. In      | No change to expected       |
|    |   | practice, the penalty is     | results for Document ID     |
|    |   | assessed to or linked with   | (Bill) number. It is shown  |
|    |   | the original receivable.     | in the GL effects section   |
|    |   |                              | of expected results.        |
|    |   | Also, the test script lists  |                             |
|    |   | a second set of input data   | Delete the Invoice Number   |
|    |   | are listed for USDACOMM.     | information from the first  |
|    |   | This is incorrect, as there  | inputs section. Change the  |
|    |   | is no requirement to enter a | title "Invoice Number' to   |
|    |   | second transaction on this   | "Customer Bill Number" in   |
|    |   | test step.                   | the expected results, and   |
|    |   |                              | add "(system generated)"    |
|    |   | Also, the document ID (Bill) | after the "3-Penalty" bill  |
|    |   | should be included in the    | number. This is consistent  |
|    |   | expected results.            | with other test steps.      |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| ## | 2 | Some systems default to      | Added assumption that "An   |
|  R | 4 | dunning letters being        | account is considered       |
| M. | 2 | produced when accounts       | delinquent 1 day after the  |
| 10 |   | receivable are over 30 days  | due date."                  |
| .3 |   | old. Younger A/R would not   |                             |
|    |   | appear in their Expected     | Added second assumption     |
|    |   | Results, as they do in ours. | that "Accounts receivable   |
|    |   |                              | that have been referred to  |
|    |   |                              | Treasury should be          |
|    |   |                              | excluded."                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Deleted the \$365 WAYNED    |
|    |   |                              | account receivable from the |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results detail and |
|    |   |                              | total line.                 |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| F  | 2 | Test step has a document     | Change Document ID in       |
| D. | 4 | number that begins with      | Inputs, Expected Results    |
| 5. | 7 | "07," but the step is in     | and GL effects from         |
| 12 |   | Cycle 6.                     | [07]{.underline}FD051201 to |
|    |   |                              | [06]{.underline}FD051201.   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| F  | 2 |                              | Changed travel dates in     |
| D. | 4 |                              | Expected Results to agree   |
| 5. | 7 |                              | with those in the Inputs.   |
| 12 |   |                              |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 | The expected results are     | Add USDANFC to the expected |
| .4 | 4 | missing one item, USDANFC.   | results.                    |
| .5 | 9 |                              |                             |
|    |   | Also, the funds to be        | Change inputs to show:      |
|    |   | queried should be identified |                             |
|    |   | in the inputs section.       | Fiscal Year 1999            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | All Funds                   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 | The org code in the general  | Add an assumption that      |
| .7 | 5 | ledger effects is missing.   | "Administrative fee is to   |
| .1 | 0 | It should be 10000. The      | be recorded as an           |
|    |   | issue regarding modification | adjustment to the original  |
|    |   | of existing receivable       | bill."                      |
|    |   | versus establishment of new  |                             |
|    |   | receivable also exists for   | No org. code required on    |
|    |   | this test step. (See         | this and other accounts     |
|    |   | comments for RM 4.1 above)   | receivable transactions.    |
|    |   |                              | See RM.12.1 item.           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 | Need to determine how many   | Show the following document |
| .7 | 5 | entries and which related    | numbers in inputs and       |
| .2 | 1 | document numbers should be   | expected results:           |
|    |   | used to reverse the original |                             |
|    |   | A/R and admin. Fee and       | Reference Document ID       |
|    |   | establish a new A/R and      | (Principal) of 02RM030301   |
|    |   | admin. Fee.                  |                             |
|    |   |                              | Reference Document ID       |
|    |   |                              | (Admin. Fee) of 06RM070101  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Document ID (New Bill) of   |
|    |   |                              | 06RM070201                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Leave Document ID of        |
|    |   |                              | 04RM070201 in both GL       |
|    |   |                              | effects.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | There is a question on the   | Split the current GL effect |
| M. | 5 | expected results for the     | 1.1 into 2 GL effects,      |
| 7. | 1 | budgetary general ledger     | consistent with the         |
| 2, |   | accounts and amounts.        | expected results. There     |
| RM |   |                              | should be one entry for     |
| 3. |   | Also, if two separate        | each receivable (and        |
| 3, |   | receivables are to be        | related anticipated         |
| RM |   | established, then there are  | collections) being          |
| 9  |   | three separate actions as    | reversed.                   |
| .3 |   | indicated in the expected    |                             |
|    |   | results. The general ledger  | Three GL effects:           |
|    |   | effects are combined for the |                             |
|    |   | first two items listed in    | 1.  for \$200 receivable    |
|    |   | the expected results.        |     reversal                |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2.  for \$20 admin fee      |
|    |   |                              |     reversal                |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 3.  for \$102 new           |
|    |   |                              |     receivable              |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 |                              | The entries in the two GL   |
| .7 | 5 |                              | effects have been           |
| .2 | 1 |                              | re-aligned. GL effect #1now |
|    |   |                              | shows all the A/R reversal  |
|    |   |                              | entries (\$220 total entry  |
|    |   |                              | to accounts 4450/4060) and  |
|    |   |                              | GL effect #2 now shows all  |
|    |   |                              | the A/R establishment       |
|    |   |                              | entries (\$102 total entry  |
|    |   |                              | to accounts 4060/4450.      |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| RM | 2 | Test calls for a report of   | Revised instructions to     |
| .9 | 5 | all claims that have been    | read "Reverse               |
| .1 | 3 | fully or partially written   | administrative charges."    |
|    |   | off, yet no Expected Results | instead of "Write-off       |
|    |   | are provided for this        | administrative charges" so  |
|    |   | report.                      | that this entry does not    |
|    |   |                              | appear on the RM.9.3        |
|    |   |                              | report.                     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed Inputs Document ID  |
|    |   |                              | (Write Off) to Document ID  |
|    |   |                              | (Reversal).                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed Expected Results to |
|    |   |                              | "Verify That:               |
|    |   |                              | Administrative revenue and  |
|    |   |                              | the customer account        |
|    |   |                              | receivable have been        |
|    |   |                              | reduced by the amount of    |
|    |   |                              | the reversal.               |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Changed "1. Admin Charges:  |
|    |   |                              | \$15.00" in Inputs and      |
|    |   |                              | Expected Results to "Amount |
|    |   |                              | Reversed: \$15.00"          |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | The inputs state 30-59 days, | In expected results, revise |
| M. | 5 | and the expected results     | the aging category of       |
| 10 | 6 | state 30-60 days.            | "30-60 days" to "30-59      |
| .1 |   |                              | days" wherever shown,       |
|    |   | Also, USDACOMM, for \$24,500 | consistent with the inputs. |
|    |   | is actually not past due by  |                             |
|    |   | 30 days or more. It is only  | In expected results, change |
|    |   | 29 days past due.            | the aging category for the  |
|    |   |                              | \$24,500 due from USDACOMM  |
|    |   | Also, the description of the | to under 30 days. This A/R  |
|    |   | expected results should be   | is not due until 1/10/00,   |
|    |   | clarified to be consistent   | per RM.2.2.                 |
|    |   | with the test step           |                             |
|    |   | description to list          | Revise the wording of the   |
|    |   | individual receivables.      | first sentence in expected  |
|    |   |                              | results to read "A          |
|    |   |                              | receivables aging report    |
|    |   |                              | reflecting the following    |
|    |   |                              | receivables and balances    |
|    |   |                              | due is produced."           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | WayneD S/B in the 30-60      | In expected results, change |
| M. | 5 | category. The A/R that was   | the aging category for the  |
| 10 | 6 | re-established due to the    | \$350 due from WAYNED to    |
| .1 |   | receipt of a NSF check       | 30-59 days.                 |
|    |   | should have the same due     |                             |
|    |   | date (11/15/99) as the       |                             |
|    |   | original receivable.         |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| P  | 2 | Expected Results show total  | Added Assumption that \"The |
| M. | 5 | 1099-MISC payments of        | subscription is considered  |
| 15 | 8 | \$3,000 for PM.13.1          | a service.\"                |
| .3 |   | subscription. Vendors often  |                             |
|    |   | erroneously include \$45,025 | (Per IRS Instructions for   |
|    |   | payment for widgets in       | Form 1099-MISC, payments of |
|    |   | PM.2.4.                      | \$600 or more to            |
|    |   |                              | partnerships, sole          |
|    |   |                              | proprietors and             |
|    |   |                              | corporations, for services, |
|    |   |                              | not merchandise (i.e.,      |
|    |   |                              | widgets), are subject to    |
|    |   |                              | 1099-MISC reporting.)       |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Expected results are not     | Replace existing expected   |
| M. | 5 | complete. For example, there | results with the following: |
| 10 | 9 | is no amount shown for       |                             |
| .4 |   | expected results. Need to    | **Verify That:**            |
|    |   | prepare an actual 1099C and  |                             |
|    |   | include in the expected      | **A Form 1099-C with the    |
|    |   | results or at a minimum      | following information is    |
|    |   | identify all necessary       | produced:**                 |
|    |   | elements of 1099C.           |                             |
|    |   |                              | Debtor's Name William       |
|    |   |                              | Prescott                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Address 3321 Maple Avenue,  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Fairfax, VA 22030           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Debtor's ID Number          |
|    |   |                              | 517-70-1612                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Date Canceled 12/15/99      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Amount Canceled \$102.00    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Interest \$0.00             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Debt Description Property   |
|    |   |                              | Lease                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Note: Dollar value is being |
|    |   |                              | added to expected results,  |
|    |   |                              | but not inputs, because the |
|    |   |                              | user would not know the     |
|    |   |                              | amount involved; it would   |
|    |   |                              | be calculated by the        |
|    |   |                              | system.                     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CF | 2 | The inputs need to be        | Revise inputs to read as    |
| 1  | 6 | reviewed. Why are            | follows:                    |
| .1 | 0 | "inactivate" and "add"       |                             |
|    |   | listed? Why is the object    | Fund 0201                   |
|    |   | code listed; usually these   |                             |
|    |   | are independent from the     | Object Class 1110           |
|    |   | organization/program codes.  |                             |
|    |   |                              | Org Code 13400              |
|    |   | The expected results do not  |                             |
|    |   | include the program code of  | Program Code 1001           |
|    |   | 1001.                        |                             |
|    |   |                              | Add the following line at   |
|    |   | Also, it is not clear that   | the end of expected         |
|    |   | there should be a link/edit  | results:                    |
|    |   | between organization codes   |                             |
|    |   | and program codes. (See      | Program Code 1001           |
|    |   | Requirement CF-6.)           |                             |
|    |   |                              | Add assumption that "A link |
|    |   |                              | is to be established        |
|    |   |                              | between the organization    |
|    |   |                              | code and the program code.  |
|    |   |                              | "                           |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CF | 2 | In addition to modifying the | Revise inputs to read as    |
| .4 | 6 | vendor type from             | follows:                    |
| .2 | 5 | non-government to employee,  |                             |
|    |   | test script should modify    | Vendor Name Donald Baker    |
|    |   | vendor record to not require |                             |
|    |   | a 1099 (or to require a      | From Vendor Type            |
|    |   | W-2).                        | Non-government              |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | To Vendor Type Employee     |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | From IRS Reporting 1099MISC |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | To IRS Reporting W-2        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Revise expected results to  |
|    |   |                              | read as follows:            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | **Verify That:**            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | **Vendor type is changed    |
|    |   |                              | from non-government to      |
|    |   |                              | employee. IRS reporting is  |
|    |   |                              | changed from 1099MISC to    |
|    |   |                              | W-2.**                      |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Vendor Name Donald Baker    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Add assumption, "Vendor now |
|    |   |                              | requires a W-2 instead of a |
|    |   |                              | 1099MISC."                  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| CF | 2 | Test script is unclear that  | Revise expected results to  |
| .4 | 6 | other vendors, i.e., may     | read as follows:            |
| .5 | 6 | appear on the report, but    |                             |
|    |   | are not to be purged.        | **Verify That:**            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | **The following vendor is   |
|    |   |                              | included in the "vendors    |
|    |   |                              | with no purchases" report   |
|    |   |                              | and is marked for purge     |
|    |   |                              | from the system.**          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1\. Vendor Report Ellen     |
|    |   |                              | Mills                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Todd Zuper                  |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2\. Marked for Purge Todd   |
|    |   |                              | Zuper                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Add assumption, "An         |
|    |   |                              | inactive vendor is defined  |
|    |   |                              | for the purpose of this     |
|    |   |                              | test as a vendor with no    |
|    |   |                              | purchasing activity for any |
|    |   |                              | of its related addresses."  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | The general ledger effects   | Correct test as noted.      |
| M. | 6 | should be broken into two    |                             |
| 13 | 7 | separate entries since there |                             |
| .2 |   | are two different accounting |                             |
|    |   | events and document numbers. |                             |
|    |   | 07RM130202 represents the    |                             |
|    |   | non-check disbursement for   |                             |
|    |   | the payment of the           |                             |
|    |   | collection fee (first three  |                             |
|    |   | line items in the G/L        |                             |
|    |   | effects). A separate general |                             |
|    |   | ledger posting is needed for |                             |
|    |   | 7RM130201, the collection of |                             |
|    |   | the A/R (the last two line   |                             |
|    |   | items in the G/L effects).   |                             |
|    |   | This should be the first GL  |                             |
|    |   | effect listed, since it has  |                             |
|    |   | the lower document number.   |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | No object code or            | In Inputs, Expected Results |
| M. | 6 | organization code provided   | and GL effects, added       |
| 13 | 7 | for posting of collections   | Organization Code 10000 and |
| .2 |   | of A/R. Also, no allocation  | Object Class 2520.          |
|    |   | was established for org      |                             |
|    |   | 10000, Category A, even      | In Expected Results, added  |
|    |   | though the \$12 charge is to | the Document ID             |
|    |   | be recorded for this entity  | (Collection) of 07RM130201, |
|    |   | (per our Status of Funds     | consistent with the Inputs. |
|    |   | report). See also items for  |                             |
|    |   | RM.6.3 and FD.2.1.           |                             |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   | VENDOR assumed that this     |                             |
|    |   | would post to object code    |                             |
|    |   | 2520 at the agency level.    |                             |
|    |   | VENDOR posted entry against  |                             |
|    |   | 4510 in lieu of 4610 to      |                             |
|    |   | avoid negative balance for   |                             |
|    |   | 10000. Created               |                             |
|    |   | reconciliation difference.   |                             |
|    |   | Vendor posted to an org/BOC  |                             |
|    |   | that had funds allotted.     |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| F  | 2 |                              | Changed all Document        |
| D. | 6 |                              | numbers in the GL effects   |
| 1. | 9 |                              | from [08]{.underline}FD0110 |
| 10 |   |                              | to [07]{.underline}FD0110.  |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 2 | Numbering sequence of        | Assign number 6. To second  |
| .6 | 7 | assumptions is incorrect.    | to last assumption.         |
| .3 | 1 | Also, the value for vendor   | Re-number last assumption   |
|    |   | \# (V-06) is incorrectly     | from 6. To 7.               |
|    |   | stated in the inputs         |                             |
|    |   | section.                     | Change vendor number in     |
|    |   |                              | inputs from 06 to V-06.     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 2 | Test step involves four      | 1.  Document ID (FY00 exp.) |
| .6 | 7 | travel transactions. GL      |     = 07FD060301            |
| .3 | 1 | effects use the same         |                             |
|    |   | Document number (07FD060301) | 2.  Document ID (FY00       |
|    |   | for all four transactions.   |     repay) = 07FD060302     |
|    |   | This is inconsistent with    |                             |
|    |   | what is done elsewhere in    | 3.  Document ID (FY01 exp.) |
|    |   | the test, e.g., FD.1.6 and   |     = 07FD060303            |
|    |   | FD.1.10.                     |                             |
|    |   |                              | 4.  Document ID (FY00 liq.) |
|    |   |                              |     = 07FD060304            |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 2 |                              | In Inputs, changed Document |
| .6 | 7 |                              | number of the advance to    |
| .3 | 1 |                              | [06]{.underline}FD051201    |
|    |   |                              | and the Document number of  |
|    |   |                              | the liquidation to          |
|    |   |                              | [07]{.underline}FD060301.   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | In GL effects, changed the  |
|    |   |                              | Document numbers from       |
|    |   |                              | [08]{.underline}FD060301 to |
|    |   |                              | [07]{.underline}FD060301.   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 2 | Document ID of the payment   | Change document number from |
| .7 | 7 | should begin with 07 instead | [08]{.underline}FD070401 to |
| .4 | 4 | of 08.                       | [07]{.underline}D070401 in  |
|    |   |                              | inputs, expected results    |
|    |   |                              | and GL effects.             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FD | 2 | The GL entry for this test   | Changed fund category in GL |
| .7 | 7 | step cites apportionment     | effects from A to B.        |
| .4 | 4 | category A and it should be  |                             |
|    |   | apportionment category B.    |                             |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Test SF133 should be revised | Revise test SF133 report    |
| .2 | 7 | to reflect \$980             | for fund 0201 by reducing   |
| .1 | 5 | reimbursable funds           | line 8A, Cat. A             |
|    |   | obligations on line 8d (and  | obligations, by \$980 and   |
|    |   | deducted from Category A     | increasing line 8D,         |
|    |   | obligations on line 8a).     | reimbursable obligations,   |
|    |   |                              | by \$980.                   |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Line 8 should be as         |
|    |   |                              | follows:                    |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Line 8A \$283,872.41        |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Line 8B \$2,000.00          |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Line 8C \$0                 |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Line 8D \$980.00            |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | Total Line 8 \$286,852.41   |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Need to determine whether    | Revise the SF133 report to  |
| .2 | 7 | line 14B2, Federal Sources   | reflect \$4500 on line      |
| .1 | 5 | with Advances, should show   | 14b2, Federal Sources with  |
|    |   | \$4500, since this is a      | Advances. The \$4500        |
|    |   | preliminary SF-133 report.   | balance in account 4222     |
|    |   | If so, would also need to    | should be shown as a        |
|    |   | add assumption that "OMB     | negative amount on line     |
|    |   | approval obtained for using  | 14b2 of the SF133.          |
|    |   | line 14b2." And verify that  |                             |
|    |   | the outlay formula still     | Add the following           |
|    |   | works or adjust the SF-133   | assumptions to the test     |
|    |   | as needed.                   | step:                       |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 1.  This is a preliminary   |
|    |   |                              |     SF133 report.           |
|    |   |                              |                             |
|    |   |                              | 2.  OMB approval has been   |
|    |   |                              |     obtained for using line |
|    |   |                              |     14b2                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Test step should indicate    | Added Fund 0201 as the      |
| .2 | 7 | that an SF133 should be      | first data element in       |
| .1 | 5 | produced for only one fund,  | Inputs and Expected         |
|    |   | 0201.                        | Results.                    |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| R  | 2 | Need to add account 6900 to  | Add FACTS summary account   |
| .2 | 7 | setup chart of accounts, for | 6900, Other Expenses, to    |
| .2 | 6 | FACTS I reporting of CM.3.2  | the chart of accounts in    |
|    |   | depreciation expense.        | the Test Plan. This is for  |
|    |   |                              | the proper FACTS I          |
|    |   |                              | reporting of \$950          |
|    |   |                              | depreciation expense in     |
|    |   |                              | CM.3.2, fund 0192.          |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| S  | 2 | Expected Results are         | Revised Expected Results to |
| GL | 7 | obsolete, stating that       | state: "Verify that: The    |
| .1 | 8 | account balance information  | pre-closing SGL entries (as |
| .3 |   | with be added NLT than May   | provided) are generated."   |
|    |   | 28, 1999.                    |                             |
|    |   |                              | Revised the Document number |
|    |   | Also, some testers have said | in GL effects from          |
|    |   | that the closing entries are | 07SGL010[1]{.underline} to  |
|    |   | not correct (someone         | 07SGL010[3]{.underline},    |
|    |   | modified them after the last | and gave a unique document  |
|    |   | QA).                         | sequence number to each     |
|    |   |                              | fund's closing entries.     |
+----+---+------------------------------+-----------------------------+