Federal Parent Locator Service

OCSE Software Change

Release 08-02 -- Minor

October 3, 2008

Release Schedule and Manifest

Document Version 1.0

June 3, 2008

Administration for Children and Families

Office of Child Support Enforcement

370 L'Enfant Promenade S.W.

Washington, DC 20447

DCN: C8-01.82.03.01

This document was prepared for the United States Department of Health
and Human Services, Office of Child Support Enforcement under Contract
Number NIH CIOSP 263-01-D-0054 by Lockheed Martin Information Systems &
Global Services, Incorporated (LM IS&GS). The work was authorized in
compliance with the following specific prime task order:

> Delivery Order Number: HHS-ACF-2006-C2500M
>
> Delivery Order Title: Federal Parent Locator Service
>
> Document Date: June 2008

Table of Contents

Executive Summary [ii](#__RefHeading___Toc198973783)

Release Schedule [iv](#release-schedule)

CSENet [1](#csenet)

New Values for Dependent-Paternity-Status Field (OCSE Ref \# 202)
[1](#new-values-for-dependent-paternity-status-field-ocse-ref-202)

New Transaction - Federal Tax Offset Transmission (OCSE Ref \# 296)
[2](#new-transaction---federal-tax-offset-transmission-ocse-ref-296)

New Transaction for Change of Payee (OCSE Ref #298)
[3](#new-transaction-for-change-of-payee-ocse-ref-298)

New Transaction to Request Paternity and Establishment (OCSE Ref \# 300)
[4](#new-transaction-to-request-paternity-and-establishment-ocse-ref-300)

States Migration to CONNECT:Direct for CSENet (OCSE Ref \# 308)
[5](#states-migration-to-connectdirect-for-csenet-ocse-ref-308)

Federal Case Registry (FCR) [6](#federal-case-registry-fcr)

Replace UI Claims Administrator\'s Address on QW Records (OCSE Ref \#
2261)
[6](#replace-ui-claims-administrators-address-on-qw-records-ocse-ref-2261)

Return QW Change and Indicator If No Prior W4 (OCSE Ref \# 2262)
[7](#return-qw-change-and-indicator-if-no-prior-w4-ocse-ref-2262)

National Change of Address Interface (OCSE Ref \# 2286)
[8](#national-change-of-address-interface-ocse-ref-2286)

New SSN/Name Verification Process (OCSE Ref \# 2421)
[9](#new-ssnname-verification-process-ocse-ref-2421)

Recycle Unverified SSN/Name Combinations (OCSE Ref \# 2479)
[10](#recycle-unverified-ssnname-combinations-ocse-ref-2479)

Intergovernmental Referral Guide (IRG)
[11](#intergovernmental-referral-guide-irg)

Enhance Address Type Download for County Addresses (OCSE Ref# 2480)
[11](#enhance-address-type-download-for-county-addresses-ocse-ref-2480)

Add Department Search Feature on State Regions Addresses Screen

(OCSE Ref# 2495)
[12](#add-department-search-feature-on-state-regions-addresses-screen-ocse-ref-2495)

Query Interstate Cases for Kids (QUICK)
[13](#query-interstate-cases-for-kids-quick)

Modify Error Page (OCSE Ref \# 2314)
[13](#modify-error-page-ocse-ref-2314)

Develop New Case Activities Audit Service (OCSE Ref \# 2478)
[14](#develop-new-case-activities-audit-service-ocse-ref-2478)

QUICK State Status Page (OCSE Ref \# 2489)
[15](#quick-state-status-page-ocse-ref-2489)

Appendix A: System Clarifications

Federal Offset [A](#federal-offset)-1

Deficit Reduction Act 2008 Changes
[A](#deficit-reduction-act-2008-changes)-1

[]{#__RefHeading___Toc198973783 .anchor}Executive Summary

The Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) is planning a Minor State
Impact Release for the Federal Parent Locator Service (FPLS), to take
effect on or about October 3, 2008. This Release Manifest describes the
schedule for, and content of, this release, which is numbered 08-02.
Note that some of the changes will be implemented at a time different
from the October 3 Release date.

The release schedule focuses on three main events:

1.  Posting of this Manifest on the OCSE Website

2.  Posting of the detailed specifications on the Website

3.  Implementation of the software changes.

The schedule also includes the State conference calls that will be held
at key points during the release planning period to assist States in
preparation for the changes.

This Manifest is primarily composed of individual sections that describe
each of the changes.

This Release includes several minor impact enhancements, which are
optional changes that require a change if the State wishes to take
advantage of the enhancement, and several no-impact enhancements, which
do not require any State action.

Release 08-02 is composed of:

-   Five minor-impact CSENet changes, four of which will be implemented
    on October 3, 2008. The rollout of the fifth item (States Migration
    to CONNECT:Direct for CSENet) begins on October 3, 2008.

-   Five FCR changes, three of which are minor impact and two of which
    are no impact. Of these five changes, four will be implemented on
    October 3, 2008. The fifth change (New SSN/Name Verification
    Process) will be implemented after October when all interfaces have
    been established.

-   Two no-impact IRG changes, which will be implemented in August,
    2008.

-   Three no-impact QUICK changes, which will be implemented on October
    3, 2008.

As a result, Release 08-02 will be implemented in the following phases:

1.  August 2008 -- IRG

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
4.  October 3, 2008 -- CSENet, QUICK, and most of the FCR changes

5.  After October 2008 - FCR New SSN/Name Verification Process.

This document also includes Appendix A, "System Clarifications", which
provides information about changes to the Deficit Reduction Act that
affect State systems, but that do not require a change to the FPLS.

+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| # Release Schedule                     |                             |
+========================================+=============================+
| Dates                                  | Activities                  |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| June 3, 2008 (Tuesday)                 | Post the Manifest to the    |
|                                        | OCSE Website.               |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FCR, CSENet, IRG and QUICK Release     | Multistate conference calls |
| Manifest Teleconferences:              | with States' technical      |
|                                        | support regarding the       |
| -   June 17, 2008 3:00 PM (Tuesday)    | Release Manifest. Please    |
|                                        | plan to attend one of the   |
| -   June 19, 2008 10:00 AM (Thursday)  | sessions.                   |
|                                        |                             |
| Federal Offset Release Manifest        | The objective of the calls  |
| Teleconferences:                       | is to address the           |
|                                        | following:                  |
| -   June 24, 2008 2:00 PM (Tuesday)    |                             |
|                                        | 1.  What are your           |
| -   June 25, 2008 10:00 AM (Wednesday) |     questions, comments     |
|                                        |     and/or concerns?        |
| -   June 26, 2008 10:00 AM (Thursday)  |                             |
|                                        | 2.  Will you need to make   |
|                                        |     changes to your system? |
|                                        |                             |
|                                        | 3.  Do you have any issues  |
|                                        |     concerning the Release  |
|                                        |     implementation date?    |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| July 3, 2008 (Thursday)                | Post the Release            |
|                                        | Specifications to the OCSE  |
|                                        | Website.                    |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| FCR, CSENet, IRG and QUICK State       | Multistate conference calls |
| Specifications Teleconferences:        | with States' technical      |
|                                        | support regarding the       |
| -   July 15, 2008 3:00 PM (Tuesday)    | Release Specifications.     |
|                                        | Please plan to attend one   |
| -   July 17, 2008 10:00 AM (Thursday)  | of the sessions.            |
|                                        |                             |
| Federal Offset State Specifications    | The objective of the calls  |
| Teleconferences:                       | is to review the            |
|                                        | specifications and Q&A.     |
| -   July 22, 2008 2:00 PM (Tuesday)    |                             |
|                                        |                             |
| -   July 23, 2008 10:00 AM (Wednesday) |                             |
|                                        |                             |
| -   July 24, 2008 10:00 AM (Thursday)  |                             |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| TBD (to be established during          | Test with States as         |
| conference calls)                      | necessary.                  |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+
| October 3, 2008 (Friday)               | OCSE implementation of FPLS |
|                                        | Release 08-02 (except for   |
|                                        | items that are noted for    |
|                                        | release at another time).   |
+----------------------------------------+-----------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # CSENet                                                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## New Values                                           |
|            |  for Dependent-Paternity-Status Field (OCSE Ref \# 202) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The CSENet application is being modified to provide new |
| Changes    | values for the Dependent-Paternity-Status data field.   |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will need to program to send, receive and retain |
|            | the new dependent status paternity values.              |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | The values of 'Y' and 'N' will be retained. New values  |
| Re         | will be added to provide clear information that a       |
| quirements | dependent was born in a marriage, that paternity has    |
| or Benefit | been established and through what process, for example: |
|            | judicially, paternity acknowledgement, etc. The new     |
|            | values will address the existing business gap regarding |
|            | paternity status.                                       |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | States have requested additional values for the         |
|            | paternity status field to convey a more accurate        |
|            | description of the paternity status of the child. The   |
|            | proposed values are closely aligned with the present    |
|            | paternity values in the revised UIFSA petition and the  |
|            | OCSE 157 Report. These values will permit improved      |
|            | reporting and convey a more accurate paternity status   |
|            | to the other State.                                     |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703.367.2578 vinette.l.elam@lmco.com       |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # CSENet                                                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## New Transact                                         |
|            | ion - Federal Tax Offset Transmission (OCSE Ref \# 296) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The CSENet application is being modified to support a   |
| Changes    | new transaction to notify the other State that an       |
|            | interstate case has been submitted for Federal Tax      |
|            | Offset.                                                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | To use this transaction, States will need to program    |
|            | their systems to send and receive this new transaction. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | The CSENet application will allow a State to inform the |
| Re         | responding State that a case has been referred for      |
| quirements | Federal Tax Offset as required in the Code of Federal   |
| or Benefit | Regulations 45 CFR 303.72(d) (1). This transaction will |
|            | allow electronic communication of information           |
|            | previously sent by paper.                               |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | The AT-04-08 (November 5, 2004) from OCSE provided the  |
|            | Final Rule that revises existing regulations on         |
|            | collecting child support arrears through the Federal    |
|            | Tax Offset process. It requires that a State that       |
|            | refers past-due support for offset must notify any      |
|            | other State involved in enforcing the support order     |
|            | that it is submitting an interstate case for offset.    |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703.367.2578 vinette.l.elam@lmco.com       |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # CSENet                                                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## New Transaction for Change of Payee (OCSE Ref #298)  |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The CSENet system is being modified to provide a new    |
| Changes    | transaction for change of payee.                        |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | To use this transaction, States will need to program    |
|            | their systems to send and receive this new transaction. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | The CSENet application will provide a unique            |
| Re         | transaction, corresponding to the Change of Payee       |
| quirements | request for a IV-D case action found in Transmittal #1  |
| or Benefit | -- Initial Request and Transmittal #2 -- Subsequent     |
|            | Actions of the Intergovernmental Forms. This            |
|            | transaction will provide an electronic method for       |
|            | communicating the information previously sent by paper. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | States have requested an electronic transaction that    |
|            | will allow caseworkers to request a change in payee     |
|            | action. This administrative action is used when the     |
|            | person or agency entitled to receive funds has changed. |
|            | It may occur with a change in public assistance or      |
|            | foster care status or with a change in custody. In some |
|            | States, court action, such as a modification, may be    |
|            | required if there is a change in custody or foster care |
|            | status.                                                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703.367.2578 <vinette.l.elam@lmco.com>     |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # CSENet                                                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## New Transaction t                                    |
|            | o Request Paternity and Establishment (OCSE Ref \# 300) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The CSENet application is being modified to provide a   |
| Changes    | new transaction to allow a State to request both        |
|            | paternity establishment and order establishment at the  |
|            | same time.                                              |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | To use this transaction, States will need to program    |
|            | their systems to send and receive this new transaction. |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | CSENet will provide a single transaction addressing the |
| Re         | most frequently requested combination of case actions.  |
| quirements | Currently the CSENet application requires two separate  |
| or Benefit | transactions, one to request paternity establishment    |
|            | and the other to request the establishment of a support |
|            | order.                                                  |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | Several States have requested the ability to establish  |
|            | paternity and an order in one transaction. This         |
|            | transaction provides a better fit to the revised UIFSA  |
|            | form, Transmittal #1. It streamlines the interstate     |
|            | paternity/order business need, and promotes electronic, |
|            | standardized interstate communications.                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703.367.2578 <vinette.l.elam@lmco.com>     |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # CSENet                                                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## States M                                             |
|            | igration to CONNECT:Direct for CSENet (OCSE Ref \# 308) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | DCL-07-10 announced OCSE's intention to consolidate its |
| Changes    | data processing infrastructure at the Social Security   |
|            | Administration's (SSA) National Computing Center (NCC). |
|            | The CSENet application was moved to the NCC in January  |
|            | 2008 as a part of this effort. OCSE plans to begin      |
|            | migrating State CSENet communications from the OCSE     |
|            | network to the SSA's CONNECT:Direct with Secure+        |
|            | network to complete the consolidation process for the   |
|            | CSENet application. A small group of States is          |
|            | currently piloting the migration effort.                |
|            |                                                         |
|            | OCSE is beginning the process to convert the remaining  |
|            | States' method of communicating CSENet data from the    |
|            | existing OCSE Network to CONNECT:Direct with Secure+.   |
|            |                                                         |
|            | There are no changes in the CSENet record layouts and   |
|            | no changes in the frequency or scheduling of processes  |
|            | as a result of the conversion process.                  |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | Beginning October 2008, States will begin conversion to |
|            | exchanging their CSENet files through their existing    |
|            | CONNECT:Direct with Secure+ connection. This conversion |
|            | may require modifications to the State's internal       |
|            | processes. A staggered conversion of States over        |
|            | several years is planned.                               |
|            |                                                         |
|            | QUICK, e-IWO, and DFAS communications will not be       |
|            | impacted by this transition. These applications will    |
|            | continue to use the OCSE Network to exchange data.      |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | OCSE's goal is to consolidate OCSE applications within  |
| Re         | one Federal data processing facility and to eliminate   |
| quirements | redundancy in communication networks.                   |
| or Benefit |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | Consolidation of OCSE applications within one Federal   |
|            | Data Processing Facility.                               |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703.367.2578 vinette.l.elam@lmco.com       |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Federal Case Registry (FCR)                           |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Replace UI Claims Ad                                 |
|            | ministrator\'s Address on QW Records (OCSE Ref \# 2261) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The FCR is being modified to return the employer's      |
| Changes    | address instead of the UI Claims Administrator's        |
|            | address on QW response records. The NDNH is being       |
|            | modified to use the QW FEIN to retrieve the employer's  |
|            | address from SSA's address file whenever the QW record  |
|            | is submitted with a UI Claims Administrator address.    |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will receive the employer's address instead of   |
|            | the UI Claims Administrator's address on QW Locate and  |
|            | Proactive Match responses. This will enable States to   |
|            | send important documents, such as income withholding    |
|            | orders, directly to the employer's address instead of   |
|            | the UI Claims Administrator address. Sending child      |
|            | support documents to the UI Claims Administrator often  |
|            | delays the delivery of important paperwork and often    |
|            | causes problems in State employer databases.            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this change, States will:                |
| Re         |                                                         |
| quirements | -   reduce misdirected mail by using the correct        |
| or Benefit |     address for serving documents                       |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   expedite income-withholding order notices           |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   expedite Service of Process                         |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   reduce labor costs for child support agencies and   |
|            |     UI Claims Administrators.                           |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | In the past, OCSE provided a CD-ROM that listed all UI  |
|            | Claims Administrators and the FEINS of the companies    |
|            | that they serve. However, in response to requests from  |
|            | States, OCSE will automate a process to replace the     |
|            | address of the UI Claims Administrator with the         |
|            | employer's address where child support documents should |
|            | be sent.                                                |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Kerry Newcombe 540.234.0349 Kerry.Newcombe@ngc.com      |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Federal Case Registry (FCR)                           |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Return QW                                            |
|            |  Change and Indicator If No Prior W4 (OCSE Ref \# 2262) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The FCR is being modified to return additional          |
| Changes    | information on QW Proactive Response Records.           |
|            | NDNH-to-FCR Proactive Matches will provide the          |
|            | difference between the current QW amount and the prior  |
|            | QW amount, for the same FEIN. When checking for a prior |
|            | QW, the FCR will look for QW records within the current |
|            | quarter and the previous two quarters. Also, when a QW  |
|            | record is submitted and no previous QW is found for the |
|            | FEIN, the system will check for the existence of a W-4. |
|            | If a W-4 has not been received, a new indicator will be |
|            | set to alert the State to pay special attention to the  |
|            | QW response record. Separate comparisons will be made   |
|            | for each FEIN when a person has multiple employers.     |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will be able to identify those QW records that   |
|            | provide new or changed information. New fields will be  |
|            | added to the Filler area in the QW portion of the       |
|            | NDNH-to-FCR Proactive Match Response Record. This will  |
|            | provide the QW amount difference as well as percent of  |
|            | change. A new indicator will also be added to this      |
|            | record to alert States when a prior W-4 has not been    |
|            | received.                                               |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | States have often indicated that the QW information     |
| Re         | received from the NDNH is duplicative and outdated.     |
| quirements | Consequently, States have been reluctant to automate    |
| or Benefit | income withholdings and/or other processes based on the |
|            | receipt of a QW match. Additionally, States have        |
|            | identified issues regarding the receipt of a QW match   |
|            | when there is no evidence of the receipt of a W-4       |
|            | record. This enhancement will highlight those QW        |
|            | records that provide new or changed information,        |
|            | improving States' ability to automate processes based   |
|            | on the QW record.                                       |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | This enhancement will support States in completing the  |
|            | following processes:                                    |
|            |                                                         |
|            | Review and adjustment -- States will be alerted to      |
|            | changes in income for both CPs and NCPs and can         |
|            | initiate a review of the obligation amount in a timely  |
|            | manner.                                                 |
|            |                                                         |
|            | Income-withholding orders -- States will be alerted to  |
|            | income sources not previously identified in W-4 records |
|            | due to errors in processing or an employer's deliberate |
|            | action. An example of this is that States will be       |
|            | alerted to military reservists who have been called to  |
|            | active duty.                                            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Kerry Newcombe 540.234.0349 Kerry.Newcombe@ngc.com      |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Federal Case Registry (FCR)                           |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ##                                                      |
|            | National Change of Address Interface (OCSE Ref \# 2286) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The FCR is being modified to enable States to check     |
| Changes    | participant names and addresses against the National    |
|            | Change of Address (NCOA) database. The NCOA is a        |
|            | national database of address change information         |
|            | maintained by the U.S. Postal Service.                  |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | The use of the NCOA will be optional for States. States |
|            | must complete an election form and annual certification |
|            | if they choose to participate. A new FCR input and      |
|            | output transaction record will be available for         |
|            | participating States.                                   |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this change, States will garner          |
| Re         | considerable benefits from the usage of the NCOA in all |
| quirements | areas of case management. These benefits include:       |
| or Benefit |                                                         |
|            | -   Reduces undeliverable mail and labor costs.         |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   Meets USPS requirements for First-Class mail        |
|            |     discounts                                           |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   Expedites mail delivery by one to two days          |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   Expedites Service of Process                        |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   Reduces forwarding mail fees                        |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   Reduces the need to generate postmaster letters to  |
|            |     the USPS                                            |
|            |                                                         |
|            | -   Tracks non-custodial parents', custodial parties',  |
|            |     and putative fathers' addresses as they move        |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | This enhancement was requested by States through        |
|            | multi-state and one-on-one conference calls.            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Kerry Newcombe 540.234.0349 Kerry.Newcombe@ngc.com      |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | Targetting October 2008.                                |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Federal Case Registry (FCR)                           |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## New SSN/Name Verification Process (OCSE Ref \# 2421) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The FCR is being modified to include an additional SSN  |
| Changes    | verification routine. The new routine verifies the SSN  |
|            | submitted by the State and requires an exact match with |
|            | the first three characters of the first name, the       |
|            | middle initial, and the month/year of birth as stored   |
|            | on the SSA file. SSNs verified with this routine will   |
|            | be returned with a code of 'V'. This process will not   |
|            | seek to find an SSN for a participant. It will only be  |
|            | used to verify an SSN submitted by the State.           |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will be able to increase the number of           |
|            | participants with verified SSN/Name combinations. No    |
|            | change is required on the part of States to take        |
|            | advantage of this change.                               |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this change, participants may have SSNs  |
| Re         | verified when their name is different on the SSA file.  |
| quirements | Often participants may have provided a correct SSN, but |
| or Benefit | because of the difference in how the name is recorded   |
|            | at SSA, the SSN is not verifiable. TANF agencies have   |
|            | long taken advantage of this SSN verification routine,  |
|            | however since it has not been used by the FCR, State    |
|            | Child Support Agencies have not been able to use the    |
|            | same SSN identifier for shared TANF cases.              |
|            | Implementation of this change will provide more         |
|            | verified SSNs and will align child support identifiers  |
|            | with TANF agencies.                                     |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | To have a higher percentage of participants whose SSN   |
|            | is verified and subject to locate processes.            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Linda Hudson 850.236.7488 linda.hudson@ngc.com          |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | To be announced.                                        |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Federal Case Registry (FCR)                           |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Recy                                                 |
|            | cle Unverified SSN/Name Combinations (OCSE Ref \# 2479) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The FCR is being modified so that it will periodically  |
| Changes    | resubmit participants with unverified SSNs to the SSN   |
|            | verification process. Participants will be recycled     |
|            | every 90 days, but will be bypassed for recycling when  |
|            | that participant has a change transaction in process.   |
|            | SSNs that are recycled and result in a verified         |
|            | SSN/Name combination will be returned to the State      |
|            | along with proactive NDNH and FCR matches.              |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will be able to improve the number of            |
|            | participants with verified SSN/Name combinations.       |
|            | States should assess the impact to their systems of     |
|            | receiving verified SSNs and proactive matches for       |
|            | SSN/Name combinations that previously did not verify.   |
|            | OCSE is considering whether to return a reserved batch  |
|            | number on the acknowledgement record. A decision will   |
|            | be made before the Release Specifications are           |
|            | finalized.                                              |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this change, child support agencies will |
| Re         | be able to take advantage of the fact that participants |
| quirements | may change their identifying information with SSA after |
| or Benefit | they are active FCR participants, such that their       |
|            | SSN/Name combination on the FCR is verifiable. With the |
|            | additional pressure from employers and the IRS for all  |
|            | persons to have an SSN/Name combination that matches    |
|            | the SSA record, it appears that often FCR participants  |
|            | correct their SSA record, but child support agencies do |
|            | not have a process to resubmit the same FCR participant |
|            | information on file for SSN verification. This process  |
|            | will remedy that issue and may provide child support    |
|            | agencies with verified SSNs. A test of this process     |
|            | found that 18% of the existing unverified SSNs were     |
|            | verifiable with current SSA data.                       |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | To have a higher percentage of participants whose SSN   |
|            | is verified and subject to locate processes.            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Linda Hudson 850.236.7488 linda.hudson@ngc.com          |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008.                                        |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Intergovernmental Referral Guide (IRG)                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Enhance Addr                                         |
|            | ess Type Download for County Addresses (OCSE Ref# 2480) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The IRG system is being modified to remove a State      |
| Changes    | selection for county address types.                     |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States and Tribes will be able to download all county   |
|            | address type records for all States. This change does   |
|            | not involve a coding impact for States.                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this change, users will not be required  |
| Re         | to select a State to download county address types.     |
| quirements |                                                         |
| or Benefit |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | To enhance the download functionality for county        |
|            | address types.                                          |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Angela Kasey 202.205.3423 angela.kasey@acf.hhs.gov      |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | August 2008                                             |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Intergovernmental Referral Guide (irg)                |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Add Department Search Fea                            |
|            | ture on State Regions Addresses Screen (OCSE Ref# 2495) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The IRG system is being modified to allow an additional |
| Changes    | search method (by Department) when searching for State  |
|            | Region addresses.                                       |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will be able to select from 'Region' or          |
|            | 'Department' when searching for State regional          |
|            | addresses. This change does not involve a coding impact |
|            | for States.                                             |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this change, a Department field drop     |
| Re         | down will be added to the search page.                  |
| quirements |                                                         |
| or Benefit |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | States have requested an additional search method that  |
|            | would improve finding State regional address records.   |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Angela Kasey 202.205.3423 angela.kasey@acf.hhs.gov      |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | August 2008                                             |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # QUERY INTERSTATE CASES FOR KIDS (quick)               |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Modify Error Page (OCSE Ref \# 2314)                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The QUICK system is being modified so that it will      |
| Changes    | provide HTML requesting States with a specific error    |
|            | message instead of a generic message.                   |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States will be able to view information about what      |
|            | caused the errors in the QUICK Web application.         |
|            |                                                         |
|            | If XML-requesting States want to take advantage of this |
|            | change, they will need to modify their application to   |
|            | reflect these changes.                                  |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this modification, States will be able   |
| Re         | to view more user-friendly information about the reason |
| quirements | for an error rather than just the generic error         |
| or Benefit | message.                                                |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | Workers have been receiving generic error messages      |
|            | without any real description of what caused the         |
|            | problem. This change will provide more detailed         |
|            | information.                                            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703-367-2578 vinette.l.elam@lmco.com       |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # QUERY INTERSTATE CASES FOR KIDS (quick)               |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Devel                                                |
|            | op New Case Activities Audit Service (OCSE Ref \# 2478) |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The QUICK System is being enhanced with a new Web       |
| Changes    | service to provide audit data for the Case Activities   |
|            | (CA) module.                                            |
|            |                                                         |
|            | Currently, HTML users who have developed the CA module  |
|            | must use the old audit service that uses the            |
|            | JITResponse schema.                                     |
|            |                                                         |
|            | The QUICK Financial module uses the JITRequest and      |
|            | JITResponse schemas to communicate financial            |
|            | information, including audit data.                      |
|            |                                                         |
|            | As part of the development of the CA module, OCSE       |
|            | developed QUICKRequest and QUICKResponse schemas to     |
|            | request and respond to both QUICK Financial and CA      |
|            | data. Development of the QUICKResponse schema, which    |
|            | includes CAAudit, saves HTML-requesting States from     |
|            | having to code for the JITResponse schema to receive    |
|            | audit data.                                             |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | States in production may continue using the JITRequest  |
|            | and JITResponse schemas until they are ready to program |
|            | for the CA module.                                      |
|            |                                                         |
|            | States currently developing QUICK, either the Financial |
|            | or CA modules, or both, must use the QUICKRequest and   |
|            | QUICKResponse schemas.                                  |
|            |                                                         |
|            | This change has no impact on XML-requesting States.     |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | HTML-requesting States will be able to code for the     |
| Re         | QUICKRequest and QUICKResponse schemas and receive all  |
| quirements | financial, case activities and audit data.              |
| or Benefit |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | An audit service upgrade will enable HTML-requesting    |
|            | States to use the QuickRequest and QuickResponse        |
|            | schemas to handle all types of data in both the         |
|            | Financial and CA modules. The JITRequest and            |
|            | JITResponse schemas will be phased out in the future.   |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703-367-2578 vinette.l.elam@lmco.com       |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # QUERY INTERSTATE CASES FOR KIDS (quick)               |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## QUICK State Status Page (OCSE Ref \# 2489)           |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | The QUICK system is being enhanced to provide workers a |
| Changes    | summary page containing information on States in        |
|            | production and the type of data/operations they         |
|            | provide.                                                |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | This will be a new HTML page added to the QUICK Web     |
|            | application. HTML-requesting States will not need to do |
|            | any programming changes in order to view the summary    |
|            | page. There is no impact to the XML-developing States,  |
|            | as this service was implemented as part of Release\     |
|            | 08-01 (Establish State Status Service).                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | As a result of this enhancement, workers will be able   |
| Re         | to view a snap shot of States in production and the     |
| quirements | type of data/operations they provide. The State Status  |
| or Benefit | Summary Page will be accessible from the Case Request   |
|            | screen.                                                 |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | This change allows workers to view all States in        |
|            | production and the type of data provided by the States  |
|            | before making a request.                                |
|            |                                                         |
|            | This service is currently available to the QUICK        |
|            | XML-developing States and is now being made available   |
|            | to HTML-requesting States.                              |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Vinette Elam 703-367-2578 vinette.l.elam@lmco.com       |
| Contact    |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 3, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+

####### Appendix A: System Clarifications

+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| System     | # Federal Offset                                        |
+============+=========================================================+
| Title      | ## Deficit Reduction Act 2008 Changes                   |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Proposed   | Remove Distinction In Offset Priority Between Past-Due  |
| Changes    | TANF And Non-TANF Support                               |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Impact     | None                                                    |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Business   | Increased child support collections                     |
| Re         |                                                         |
| quirements |                                                         |
| or Benefit |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Reason     | Passage of Senate bill 1932, Deficit Reduction Act      |
|            | (DRA) of 2005, amended §464(c) of the Social Security   |
|            | Act to remove the distinction in offset priority        |
|            | between past-due TANF and Non-TANF child support        |
|            | arrearages.                                             |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Point of   | Scott Hale 202-401-5745 <scott.hale@acf.hhs.gov>        |
| Contact    |                                                         |
|            | Kelley Donovan 202-205-3421                             |
|            | <kelley.donovan@acf.hhs.gov>                            |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Targeted   | October 1, 2008                                         |
| Impl       |                                                         |
| ementation |                                                         |
| Date       |                                                         |
+------------+---------------------------------------------------------+