**Record of Decision**

**Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor Project**

**Utah Transit Authority**

**Decision**

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) has determined that the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969
have been satisfied for the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor Project proposed
by the Utah Transit Authority (UTA). This FTA decision applies to the
Light Rail Transit (LRT) Build Alternative, which is described and
evaluated in the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor Project Final Environmental
Impact Statement signed June 28, 2007.

The selected LRT Build Alternative consists of a 10.6-mile LRT line
extension from the existing UTA Sandy/Salt Lake TRAX LRT line at 6400
South in Murray (Salt Lake County) to the new Daybreak Development in
South Jordan via the cities of Murray, Midvale, West Jordan and South
Jordan. FTA has considered the information in the public record for the
Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor Project including the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) of August 2005 and the Final EIS signed June 28,
2007. Based on these findings, the LRT Build alternative was selected as
the preferred alternative. This Record of Decision (ROD) pertains to the
preferred alternative as described in the Final EIS and whose impacts
and mitigation measures are summarized in **Attachments A**, **B** and
**C** which are incorporated by reference into this ROD.

**Background**

The Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC)'s 1996 *Long Range Transit
Analysis*, describes the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor as having high
potential transit patronage in the year 2015. This conclusion was based
on long-range socioeconomic and travel demand forecasts for the region.
In 2002, UTA acquired 35 feet of right-of-way (ROW) north of the UPRR
Bingham Branch alignment from 700 West to the Bagley Spur at
approximately 9600 South and 5200 West and all of the ROW from that
point west to Copperton. Following circulation of the Final EIS, UTA
finalized a purchase and sale agreement with UPRR to purchase the
remaining ROW between 700 West to the Bagley Spur (5600 West) in July
2007.

WFRC's December 2000 *South Salt Lake County Transit Corridors Analysis*
identified the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor as a prime candidate for
improved transit service. The corridor traverses a rapidly growing area
of the Salt Lake region that requires improved mobility and connectivity
to other growth areas and to the major activity centers in the region.

While existing bus service in the corridor is sufficient to meet current
demand, near-term growth in southwestern Salt Lake County already is
requiring greater transit capacity. As growth continues in this area,
regional studies and plans recommend that rail transit be extended into
this corridor by 2010 (WFRC).

The recommended project for the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor resulted
from the *South Salt Lake County Transit Corridors Analysis* (WFRC) and
is one component of the *2030* *Long Range Transportation Plan* (LRTP).
The five-line LRT system within Salt Lake County includes the existing
Sandy/Salt Lake Line from the downtown Salt Lake Central Business
District (CBD) to Sandy (with an extension planned to Draper); the
existing University Line from downtown Salt Lake City east to the
University Medical Center, and planned branches west to the Salt Lake
City International Airport, west to West Valley City, and southwest to
West Jordan and South Jordan.

**Alternatives Considered in the EIS**

Based on the results and recommendations of previous studies, the Draft
EIS evaluated three alternatives: No Action, Enhanced Bus and LRT Build.
Following circulation of the Draft EIS and receipt of comments, the
Enhanced Bus alternative was eliminated from further consideration and
not carried forward because it did not meet the purpose and need of the
project. Based on the Draft EIS and public and agency comments received
during comment period and at the public hearing, the WFRC, the local
Metropolitan Planning Organization, selected the LRT Build alternative
in October 2005 as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). The Final
EIS evaluates the No Action and LRT Build alternatives described below.

The **No Action Alternative** includes all existing and committed future
roadway and transit improvements to the regional transportation system.
It includes only proposed projects that are funded as part of the
fiscally-constrained LRTP except it does not include the Mid-Jordan
Transit Corridor project. The No Action Alternative uses the year 2030
for its future analysis and includes projected future demographic and
land use changes. The No Action 2030 roadway network includes all
existing and committed roadway improvements under the *2002-2006
Transportation Improvement Program* (TIP) and all planned roadway
improvements under the *WFRC 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan*. The
No Action 2030 transit network includes all transit service improvements
planned under the *2002-2006 Transit Development Program* (TDP), except
the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor project. All projects in the TDP are in
the TIP and the LRTP.

The No Action Alternative also includes all assumed travel demand
management strategies (TDM) and transportation systems management (TSM)
improvements that are currently implemented in the Salt Lake City
metropolitan area.

The **LRT Build Alternative** proposes to construct light rail transit
along the existing UPRR Bingham Branch corridor, beginning at the
existing 6400 South/Fashion Place West Station and ending in Daybreak at
approximately 11400 South. The total alignment is a distance of 10.6
miles. Station improvements are planned at the existing 6400
South/Fashion Place West station and nine new stations are proposed
along the alignment at Bingham Junction (Midvale Slag Site), Gardner
Village, Redwood (West Jordan City Hall), 2700 West, Bangerter (South
Station Development), 4800 West, 5600 West, Daybreak North, and Daybreak
South. These station locations include park and ride capability and
feeder bus service. These stations will include a total of 4,228
park-and-ride spaces by the year 2030.

For the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor, UTA will construct two tracks along
the UPRR Bingham Branch. LRT will use both tracks during transit
operating hours, typically from 5:00 AM to midnight on weeknights, and
1:45 AM on weekends. Freight will operate on the same tracks during
non-LRT hours. UTA will use the ROW purchased from UPRR in 2002 and
2007. UTA will use its existing Rail Service Center maintenance facility
for the project.

**Basis for Decision**

The LRT Build Alternative provides the greatest achievement of project
objectives compared to the No Action Alternative. In contrast, the No
Action Alternative provides a very small, if any, level of achievement.
The LRT Build Alternative also clearly provides the best
quantitatively-measured mobility improvements in travel time and transit
ridership. It is both affordable within UTA's resources and
cost-effective as a mobility investment.

The Project's EIS, supported by the previous WFRC studies, provides a
detailed statement of environmental impacts for the LRT Build
Alternative as required by NEPA, the Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended
in 1990, federal transit laws (49 USC Chapter 53) and regulations (23
CFR 771). Positive community impacts of the LRT Build Alternative
include development opportunities around stations consistent with
community plans and desires, and improved access. Adverse community and
environmental impacts of the LRT Build Alternative include noise and
vibration adjacent to the trackway and property acquisitions and
relocations for station facilities and parking. UTA has proposed
mitigation treatments to address noise and vibration impacts and will
follow the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970, as amended with regard to acquisitions and
relocations. A small but positive air quality benefit will be realized.

The LRT project represents the most cost effective alternative and, with
the committed mitigation measures, will minimize impacts on the
environment. The EIS identified the purpose of the project to meet the
following objectives:

-   Improve the local UTA bus system by reallocating bus miles more
    efficiently within the corridor;

-   Improve mobility and connectivity;

-   Increase overall travel capacity in the corridor;

-   Reduce traffic congestion on major east-west roadways;

-   Increase access to planned development/redevelopment areas within
    the corridor;

-   Increase access to major employers in the corridor to enhance
    economic development potential;

-   Improve transit service for non-work trips;

-   Create opportunities for transit oriented development;

-   Provide a balanced transportation system; and

-   Reduce automobile emissions.

The LRT project will address the following regional needs:

-   A projected 60 percent growth in population in Salt Lake County by
    2030 with even greater growth in the southwest quadrant and the
    study area;

-   Similar growth projections for employment;

-   Limited additional highway investment by 2030 for the travel markets
    analyzed in the EIS; and

-   Improved efficiency of the UTA transit system.

In summary, the LRT Build Alternative meets the purpose and need. It
provides a high degree of mobility improvement in terms of travel time,
ridership, connectivity, and access. It is affordable, cost-effective,
provides positive impacts on station area land use and economic
development, provides good service to the riding public, and has strong
support from the affected cities. Its adverse environmental impacts can
be mitigated.

**Public Opportunity to Comment**

As required by federal regulations, FTA published a Notice of Intent to
prepare an EIS in the Federal Register December 21, 2001. FTA, in
cooperation with WFRC and UTA, developed a scoping process that included
one agency meeting and two public scoping meetings. In addition, the
project team conducted outreach to individuals located directly adjacent
to the project corridor.

Public meeting/open houses were held near the end of conceptual
alternatives development and evaluation (April 2002) and following the
detailed evaluation of the No Action, Enhanced Bus, and LRT Build
Alternatives (August 2002). This second meeting included a formal Public
Hearing. The public also had access to a project web site, and a project
telephone hotline to receive public comment and questions. UTA also
provided notices/fliers in neighborhoods adjacent to the UPRR Bingham
Branch.

FTA and UTA circulated the Draft EIS for a 45-day public review and
comment period beginning August 5 and ending September 19, 2005. During
this comment period, the Draft EIS was made available to interested
parties including private citizens, community groups, the business
community, elected officials, and public agencies. A public hearing was
held August 30, 2005 to formally receive comments. Public comments were
submitted in writing throughout the full comment period. UTA has
prepared responses to all comments and has addressed and resolved
outstanding issues in the Final EIS which was signed on June 28, 2007.

Because of a significant change in project definition and related noise
impacts from the Draft EIS to the Final EIS, UTA held a public meeting
in August 2006 to explain the additional noise and vibration impacts to
nearby residents potentially affected by the nighttime freight
movements. UTA committed to working with the community to address noise
issues during final design and construction.

**Project Impacts and Measures to Minimize Harm**

All environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified in the
Final EIS are summarized in **Attachment A**.

**Attachment B** summarizes UTA's proposed shared parking solution with
affected municipalities. Shared parking for this project is defined as
that in which the public or private third party participates in the
project costs by donating to UTA real property or existing parking
improvements (donation). Shared parking also includes instances in which
a public or private third party contributes a portion of the design or
construction costs related to such improvements (in-kind contribution).

The Mid-Jordan project will involve coordination with federal, state and
local agencies, including application for permits to meet regulatory
requirements. **Attachment C** noting the impact category and
responsible agency, summarizes coordination efforts UTA will undertake
to move forward with the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor project.

**Mitigation Commitments**

UTA will implement all mitigation measures identified in the Final EIS.
FTA will require in both the Full Funding Grant Agreement (FFGA) and as
a condition of any other grants made in connection with this project
that UTA will carry out all mitigation commitments identified in the
Final EIS and in this ROD.

**Land Use (4.1):** In general, land use changes along the alignment and
at station locations will be positive. There is potential for transit
oriented development at several station locations. UTA will continue to
coordinate with municipalities during final design and construction.

**Social and Economic Conditions (4.2):** The project will create new
job opportunities, increase mass transit options to school and work, and
increase pedestrian activity at station areas resulting in positive
impact to surrounding businesses and activities. Property that is
required for construction of the LRT project will be subject to the
provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing
regulations (49 CFR Part 24). All property to be acquired will be
purchased at fair market value and moving expenses will be reimbursed
for all actual and related costs incurred in moving. In addition, UTA
will follow procedures in their *Property Acquisition Management Plan.*

**Transportation (4.3 -- *See also Chapter 5*):** A significant number
of vehicle trips will be diverted to station areas by
park-and-ride/kiss-and-ride rail passengers. It is the responsibility of
UTA to mitigate the impacts of these trips. Travel forecasting has
indicated that by 2030, 4,228 parking spaces will be necessary to
service Mid-Jordan LRT ridership. By opening year 2010, 3,035 spaces are
forecasted to be needed. UTA has coordinated with local municipalities
throughout project development to mitigate these impacts and to search
for shared parking solutions. If proposed shared parking fails to
materialize, UTA will be responsible for implementing all of the parking
needed to serve the transit project. See Attachment B.

**Air Quality (4.4):** In general the project will have a positive
effect on regional air quality. There will be some localized increases
in emission concentration at intersections near station park and ride
facilities. A Long-Range Transportation Plan has been prepared and
analyzed for emissions of controlled air pollutants and been found to
satisfy the emission limits established in the State Implementation
Plan.

The federal Clean Air Act (40 CFR Parts 51 and 93), as amended, requires
that transportation projects conform with the State Implementation
Plan's (SIP) purpose of eliminating or reducing the severity and number
of violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and
of achieving expeditious attainment of such standards. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regulation implementing this provision of the
Clean Air Act establishes criteria for demonstrating that a
transportation project is in conformity with applicable air quality
plans. The performance of the selected light rail project in meeting the
conformity criteria contained in the EPA regulation was evaluated in the
Final EIS Section 4.4.2. The project meets the criteria in 40 CFR Parts
51 and 93 for projects from a conforming plan and Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and conforms to air quality plans for the
Wasatch Front region and the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990.

**Noise (4.5):** UTA will run LRT vehicles every 15 minutes during peak
hours from 5:00 AM until midnight on weekdays, and 1:45 AM on weekends.
Freight service will operate from midnight to 5:00 AM on weeknights, and
from 1:45 AM to 5:00 AM on weekends. LRT operation will affect 216
residences with moderate noise impact and 94 residential structures and
1 park with "Severe Impact". Because the impact of LRT wheels over rail
gaps at track turnout locations increases LRT noise by as much as 6 dBA
(decibels measured on the A-weighted system), turnouts are a major
source of noise impact. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has
issued new regulations (49 CFR Parts 222 and 229) regarding safety at
grade crossings to which UTA will adhere that may result in noise
impacts to sensitive receptors near grade crossings.

To mitigate LRT operational noise, UTA has committed to construct 23,700
feet of noise wall. The Final EIS identifies 15 areas where noise walls
between 8 to 15 feet in height are required. (see: Figure 4-7, Sheet
1-13) During final design, UTA will refine design to locate turnouts
away from sensitive areas and will determine appropriate switch types
and locations. Where this is infeasible, UTA will employ flange-bearing
or moveable-point frogs in place of standard rigid frogs. The Final EIS
identified seven severe impacts and 64 moderate impacts remaining
following sound wall construction and special track element
installation. These impacts would occur primarily at locations near
grade crossings where barriers are less effective and where additional
impacts would result from the nighttime freight train and horn noise.
UTA will calibrate all LRT on-board horns and bells to operate at a
maximum noise level of 64 dBA at 50 feet, and all audible stationary
warning devices to operate at a maximum noise level of 72 dBA at 50
feet.

UTA is working with the local communities to facilitate their
establishment of a "quiet zone" throughout the entire project area.
Establishing a quiet zone would address audible warning signal noise not
only from UTA trains, but would eliminate existing horn noise from the
freight trains as well. Establishing a quiet zone requires cooperative
action among the municipalities, the Utah Department of Transportation
(UDOT), FRA and UTA. The cities must initiate the request through
application to FRA. In addition, to meet safety criteria, improvements
are required at grade crossings; these include modifications to the
streets, raised medians, warning lights and gates. UTA is providing
these improvements and is taking a lead role in coordination efforts
with these entities to facilitate the establishment of the quiet zone
throughout the corridor. Should a quiet zone not be implemented before
project start-up, UTA will provide sound insulation for the remaining
seven severely impacted residences to reduce the impacts to "moderate."

**Vibration (4.6)**: The Final EIS indicates there are 71 residences in
8 locations with vibration impact. UTA will evaluate alternative
mitigation measures and present a preferred approach to respond to
vibration impacts during final design. As part of these investigations,
UTA will conduct site-specific analyses to measure
vibration-transmission properties of the soils. The Final EIS identified
5 additional sites for vibration testing in addition to the three sites
previously identified in the Draft EIS. Applying the standards from the
FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, during final
design, UTA will investigate possible use of:

-   ballast mats,

-   resilient supported ties, and

-   special trackwork at crossovers and turnouts.

**Water Resources (4.7):** LRT construction will alter crossings at the
Jordan River, Bingham Creek, and canal crossings; these alterations
include installation of new box culverts or bridges and removal of
existing box culverts or bridges. Nine new stations and parking lots
with impervious surfaces will be constructed.

Floodplains and drainage treatments will be further refined during final
design. Prior to construction activities, UTA will coordinate with,
local municipalities, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to evaluate the project, provide
recommendations, and prescribe mitigation options for floodplain
impacts. UTA will ensure that storm drains, irrigation systems, and
underdrains located in the project vicinity will not be adversely
affected. In addition, UTA will install a retaining wall to avoid
impacts to the I-15 detention basin.

UTA will perform hydraulic modeling at the new bridge over the Jordan
River and the new box culvert over Bingham Creek to ensure compliance
with Salt Lake County's hydraulic design criteria. To ensure that
channel capacity for storm water flow is maintained, Salt Lake County
Flood Control permits will be required for the Jordan River, Bingham
Creek, Utah Lake Distributing Canal, Utah and Salt Lake Canal, South
Jordan Canal, and North Jordan Canal. In addition to the flood control
permits, to limit impact and alterations to the natural stream, Stream
Alteration Permits, issued by the Division of Water Rights will be
required for the Jordan River and Bingham Creek. A Sovereign Land
easement will be required from the Utah Division for Forestry, Fire and
State Lands for any expanded or widened bridge crossings of the Jordan
River. The purpose of the easement will be to mitigate any impact that
will adversely affect sovereign land management objectives specified in
State regulations.

In accordance with FEMA, UTA will incorporate appropriate engineering
design of all structures within the floodplain. A FEMA National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) Elevation Certificate may be required if
actions alter the local floodplain.

Stations will be designed to include proper stormwater runoff control
and drainage considerations. UTA will follow City stormwater runoff
control and drainage standards. In addition, discharges to the Jordan
River, Bingham Creek, Utah Lake Distributing Canal, Utah and Salt Lake
Canal, South Jordan Canal, and the North Jordan Canal will meet Salt
Lake County standards. Parking areas will be graded to funnel surface
water runoff into detention basins and oil/water separators. UTA will
construct detention basins at each station designed to release captured
runoff either at predevelopment flow rates or at the individual cities'
regulatory rates.

**Biological Resources (4.8):**

*Wetlands:* The project will impact approximately 0.323 acres of
jurisdictional wetlands. UTA has coordinated with the COE throughout the
NEPA process and will submit a Section 404 Permit application under
provisions of Nationwide Permit 14 during final design to include
specific mitigation plans. UTA will address all provisions of the
permit. Enhancing, restoring or constructing wetlands of the same type
as those filled by project construction will compensate for loss of
wetland functions. UTA will prepare a wetlands mitigation and monitoring
plan in conjunction with the Section 404 permitting process.

*Vegetation:* The LRT project will permanently disturb approximately
173.2 acres of vegetation. These include 172.7 acres of currently
disturbed areas, 0.323 acres of wetland, and 0.2 acres of mountain
brush. UTA will require contractors to implement the following
procedures:

-   Fence areas of existing vegetation.

-   Limit construction access in areas of existing vegetation.

-   Develop a weed management plan during final design in coordination
    with the Salt Lake County Weed and Landscaping Supervisor.

-   Minimize the removal of trees and shrubs.

-   Maintain all equipment used for construction to ensure it is free of
    noxious weed seed.

-   Dispense fuel and maintain equipment only in designated areas.

-   Implement best management practices (BMP) to reduce sedimentation
    and erosion impacts.

In addition, UTA will develop a revegetation plan for areas disturbed
during construction. UTA will require contractors to:

-   Salvage topsoil and reuse it to restore areas disturbed.

-   As specified in the revegetation plan, seed or plant temporarily
    disturbed areas.

-   Re-vegetate all areas that are subject to compaction by construction
    access or other activities.

*Wildlife, fisheries, threatened and endangered species:* Construction
will result in permanent disturbance of nearly 174 acres of wildlife
habitat. Vegetation clearing, earth-moving, and other construction
activities have the potential to destroy bird nests. Nearly all species
of birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. No
threatened and endangered species will be impacted, but there are three
species of concern known to reside in the project area and potentially
could be affected: Ferruginous Hawk, Short-Eared Owl, and Long-Billed
Curlew. UTA will develop final design plans to minimize wildlife effects
including:

-   Schedule land-clearing activities to avoid the breeding season
    avoiding impacts to bird nests.

-   If the bird breeding season cannot be avoided, a qualified
    ornithologist will survey the construction zone. If occupied nests
    are detected, the area will be conspicuously flagged. The
    construction crew will avoid any activities until the bird nests are
    no longer occupied.

In addition, UTA will conduct raptor nest surveys during the winter
months to identify nests. If nests are found, a second survey will
determine occupancy and identify specific areas to avoid during the
breeding season. Work within designated areas around nests will be
prohibited during the breeding season.

The mitigation measures discussed for impacts on wetlands, vegetation
communities, and wildlife and fisheries will minimize impacts to species
of concern.

**Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Wastes (4.9):** Implementation of
the project will increase the number of LRT vehicles that will require
maintenance leading to an increased use of potentially hazardous
materials at the Rail Service Center. To reduce risk of exposure due to
this increased use, UTA will follow all current materials storage and
handling procedures that UTA has implemented in an Environmental
Management System (EMS) per ISO 14001 for its maintenance facilities
including the Rail Service Center. In addition, there is the potential
to encounter hazardous materials during construction. Based on
information collected during the Environmental Hazards Assessment (EHA),
areas of concern for hazardous materials include:

-   One current National Priorities List (NPL) site, one site that was
    deleted from the NPL, and one proposed NPL site;

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   15 CERCLA sites;

-   5 NFRAP and/or Archived CERCLA sites; and

-   58 UST sites, including 4 open LUST sites, 20 closed LUST sites, and
    13 active UST sites.

If construction were to lead to exposure of the public or construction
workers to concentrations of hazardous materials exceeding acceptable
regulatory levels, UTA would follow construction methods to prevent
mixing and potential cross-contamination of soil and ground water.
Personal protective equipment for construction workers will be used as
necessary to reduce the potential for exposure to hazardous materials.
Based on correspondence from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
dated June 20, 2007 with regard to the Midvale Slag site, UTA agrees to
comply with the pertinent conditions of the consent decree, access
agreement, and covenant not to sue. UTA further agrees to comply with
the Midvale Institutional Controls Ordinance for Bingham Junction.

**Utilities (4.10):** The project could result in 250 potential
utilities conflicts during construction; of these, 35 would be
categorized as high conflict (need to be removed and relocated), 61
would be medium (require treatment such as casing extension, new casing
installation, lowering, or other adjustments) and 154 would be low
(minimally impacted). Utilities will be relocated or protected during
construction. UTA has initiated contacts with utility owners/providers
and will continue to coordinate with them.

**Energy and Mineral Resources (4.11):** The project provides a more
energy efficient transportation system by decreasing vehicle miles
traveled and energy consumption by 498 million BTU per day. This project
has no impact on mineral extraction.

**Historical, Archaeological, and Paleontological Sites (4.12)**:
Construction of the Gardner Village Station will result in demolition
and destruction of an historic structure at 1095 (also listed as 1099)
West 7800 South, West Jordan. Temporary construction impacts to the
historic West Jordan Ward Meetinghouse, also known as West Jordan
Pioneer Hall, Rock Church, Daughters of Utah Pioneers Pioneer Hall (1140
West 7800 South, West Jordan) and Gardner Mill, 1050 West 7800 South,
West Jordan will be avoided following measures specified in the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). UTA staff has coordinated with the Utah
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) throughout the study to
identify resources, impacts and proper mitigation. A Section 106 MOA was
executed November 2006 by FTA, UTA, and SHPO that specifies mitigation
to address the cultural resource impacts.

**Parklands, Open Space and Trails (4.13):** There will be no direct
impacts on parklands, recreation facilities, or open spaces; however,
Green Meadow Park will experience increased noise levels. UTA will
construct a noise wall along the LRT tracks at the park to mitigate the
impact.

During construction of the LRT alignment over a new bridge across the
Jordan River Parkway, a section of the Jordan River Parkway will be
closed during construction; UTA will provide a detour with posted
signage for trail users.

**Visual Resources (4.14):** UTA will continue to work with local
communities during final design to incorporate design features and
landscape applications that are compatible with station area aesthetics.

**Public Safety and Security (4.15):** Emergency response activities may
increase slightly at stations and along the corridor. The installation
of barrier gates at grade crossings may affect slightly the response
time for emergency vehicles responding to community emergencies.

UTA will hire additional safety officers to ensure that the level of
security currently provided at existing TRAX stations will be
maintained. The new stations will be well lit to deter criminal
activities.

As the frequency of trains will increase, fencing or berms will be
installed along open areas the length of the tracks to reduce public
access and all at-grade crossings will be upgraded to include gates and
bells to alert school children, other pedestrians and vehicular traffic
to oncoming trains. Safety is the major priority and at-grade crossing
bells will sound even under quiet zone conditions. UTA currently has a
"Train for Safety" program to educate the public on rules to remain safe
around transit vehicles. UTA will implement a media campaign using
"Train for Safety" to alert the public and schools.

**Construction Impacts (4.16)**: UTA will require contractors to adhere
to construction specifications that will avoid or minimize impact to
sensitive areas within or adjacent to the construction zones. These
specifications identify measures to address construction-related impacts
including access maintenance to all homes and businesses, traffic
control, construction noise and vibration, dust abatement, sediment and
erosion control, prevention of ground water contamination, steps to
follow in case hazardous materials are uncovered, and steps in the event
archaeological resources were unearthed. UTA will establish a public
information program during the construction phase to advise the public
about construction scheduling, traffic detouring, and other concerns.

**Indirect and Cumulative Effects (4.17):** Cumulative adverse effects
to surface waters and floodplains from ground disturbing activities and
increased sedimentation and runoff could be significant. UTA will follow
the mitigation measures identified in Section 4.7 (Water Resources) to
collect storm water runoff in catch basins and filter the water prior to
infiltration into local groundwater.

**Summary of Agency Permits and Coordination (4.18):** The project will
involve coordination with federal, state and local agencies, including
application for permits to meet regulatory requirements. See Attachment
C.

**Section 4(f) and 6(f) Evaluation (8.0)**

A total of 14 publicly-owned parks and recreational areas and 9
pedestrian/bicycle trails occur in the vicinity of the LRT corridor and
are protected by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of
1966. FTA has determined that there is constructive use of one park due
to noise impacts created by the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor Project. UTA
will construct a noise barrier to mitigate the noise impact to the park
adjacent to the corridor, so FTA has determined that there would be no
constructive use of this park. In addition, there is a temporary
construction impact to the Jordan River Parkway Trail. A temporary
construction easement will be required and a portion of the trail will
need to be detoured during construction to ensure public safety.
Coordination and concurrence with West Jordan City regarding the
temporary trail impact is found in the Final EIS, Appendix B.

As noted under the Cultural Resources discussion, the project will
require the demolition of the historic property at 1095/1099 West 7800
South, West Jordan. FTA and UTA have coordinated with the SHPO on these
matters, and all parties have signed an MOA to address this impact and
appropriate mitigation measures; in addition, the MOA specifies measures
to avoid construction impacts to the West Jordan Ward Meetinghouse.

FTA has determined that there is no feasible or prudent alternative to
the demolition of the property at 1095/1099 West 7800 South and the
temporary construction impact to the Jordan River Parkway. Furthermore,
FTA has determined that the project includes all possible planning to
minimize harm to the identified parks, recreational areas, wildlife or
waterfowl refuge areas, and historic sites located in the Mid-Jordan
project area, as reflected in the stipulations contained in the Section
106 MOA and in coordination letters with West Jordan City regarding the
Jordan River Parkway.

No Section 6(f) properties will be taken, consequently, no Section 6(f)
use will occur.

**Mitigation Monitoring Program**

FTA will provide oversight to assure that all mitigation measures
identified in the Final EIS are adequately addressed, and that
coordination with other public agencies on issues related to the project
as stipulated in the Final EIS is accomplished. UTA is developing a
Mitigation Monitoring Program to track each of these mitigation
measures, and will submit quarterly reports to FTA to report on this
progress.

**Finding**

The environmental record for the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor Project is
included in the Draft EIS (August 2005) and the Final EIS (June 28,
2007). These documents present the detailed statement required by NEPA
and 49 U.S.C. 5324(b) and include:

-   the environmental impacts of the project;

-   the adverse environmental impacts that cannot be avoided should the
    project be implemented; and

-   alternatives to the proposed project.

On the basis of the evaluation of the social, environmental and economic
impacts contained in the Final EIS and the written and oral comments
offered by the public and other agencies, FTA has determined, in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(b) that:

-   Adequate opportunity was afforded for the presentation of views by
    all parties with vested economic, social or environmental interest
    in the project and that fair consideration has been given to the
    preservation and enhancement of the environment and to the interests
    of the community in which the proposed project is to be located; and

-   All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize the adverse
    environmental effects of the proposed project and where adverse
    environmental effects remain, no reasonable alternative to avoid or
    further mitigate such effects exists.

On the basis of the determinations made in compliance with relevant
provisions of federal law, FTA finds the Mid-Jordan Transit Corridor
project satisfies the requirements of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, the Clean Air Act of 1970, and the U.S. Department of
Transportation Act of 1966, all as amended.

/signed by Charmaine Knighton for\.../ September 24, 2007

Terry J. Rosapep Date of Record of Decision

FTA Regional Administrator, Region VIII

**ATTACHMENT A**

+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Su    |                              |                              |
| mmary |                              |                              |
| of    |                              |                              |
| Env   |                              |                              |
| ironm |                              |                              |
| ental |                              |                              |
| Im    |                              |                              |
| pacts |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Mitig |                              |                              |
| ation |                              |                              |
| Mea   |                              |                              |
| sures |                              |                              |
| for   |                              |                              |
| the   |                              |                              |
| Mid-J |                              |                              |
| ordan |                              |                              |
| Tr    |                              |                              |
| ansit |                              |                              |
| Cor   |                              |                              |
| ridor |                              |                              |
+=======+==============================+==============================+
| Page  | Impact                       | Mitigation Approach          |
| No.   |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| S     |                              |                              |
| ocial |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Eco   |                              |                              |
| nomic |                              |                              |
| Condi |                              |                              |
| tions |                              |                              |
| (4.2) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-9   | Acquisition and relocation   | UTA will comply with the     |
|       | of 7 businesses and 6        | Uniform Relocation           |
|       | single-family residences     | Assistance and Real Property |
|       |                              | Acquisition Policies Act of  |
|       |                              | 1970 as Amended for all      |
|       |                              | acquisitions and             |
|       |                              | relocations.                 |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-10  | Partial acquisition of       |                              |
| thru  | approximately 67 acres from  |                              |
| 4-11  | 52 identified properties     |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Tran  |                              |                              |
| sport |                              |                              |
| ation |                              |                              |
| (4    |                              |                              |
| .3) - |                              |                              |
| See   |                              |                              |
| Final |                              |                              |
| EIS   |                              |                              |
| Ch    |                              |                              |
| apter |                              |                              |
| 5     |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 5-3   | There is significant         | For opening year 2010 UTA    |
|       | park-and-ride demand         | will be responsible for      |
|       | projected at station areas   | providing 3,035 parking      |
|       | which increases contaminant  | stalls at nine (9) stations. |
|       | run-off identified in        | For the forecast year 2030,  |
|       | Section 4.7 and requires     | UTA is responsible for       |
|       | land acquisition as          | providing 4,228 parking      |
|       | identified in Section 4.2.   | stalls at these stations.    |
|       | Refer to those sections for  | See Attachment B, Table      |
|       | impacts and mitigations.     | 5.3-5, for UTA's Shared      |
|       |                              | Parking Solution.            |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Noise |                              |                              |
| (4.5) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-21  | LRT operations affect 310    | 23,700 lineal feet of noise  |
| thru  | residences; 94 with severe   | walls ranging from 8 to 15   |
| 4-22  | impact, 216 with moderate    | feet in height; additional   |
|       | impact and one park with     | special track and switching  |
|       | severe impact                | design mitigation will be    |
|       |                              | investigated during final    |
|       |                              | design.                      |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-21  | Wayside impact from LRT and  | UTA is working with local    |
| thru  | Freight Horn Noise           | communities to implement     |
| 4-22  |                              | quiet zones                  |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-22  | Seven (7) severe noise       | UTA will provide sound       |
|       | impacts will remain after    | insulation at the seven      |
|       | the installation of noise    | residences identified in the |
|       | walls.                       | FEIS to reduce the sound     |
|       |                              | impacts to "moderate." In    |
|       |                              | the event of the             |
|       |                              | implementation of a quiet    |
|       |                              | zone, this mitigation        |
|       |                              | measure will not be          |
|       |                              | necessary.                   |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-21  | Uncalibrated audible         | Prior to project start-up,   |
|       | stationary and on-board      | all rail vehicles using this |
|       | warning devices can produce  | corridor will have their     |
|       | noise impacts.               | on-board horns and bells     |
|       |                              | calibrated to operate at a   |
|       |                              | maximum noise level of 64    |
|       |                              | dBA at 50 feet, and all      |
|       |                              | audible stationary warming   |
|       |                              | devices will be calibrated   |
|       |                              | to operate at a maximum      |
|       |                              | noise level of 72 dBA at 50  |
|       |                              | feet.                        |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Vibr  |                              |                              |
| ation |                              |                              |
| (4.6) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-24  | 71 residences subject to LRT | During Final Design, UTA     |
| the   | vibration impacts            | will conduct site-specific   |
| 4-25  |                              | analyses to measure          |
|       |                              | vibration-transmission       |
|       |                              | properties of the soils. In  |
|       |                              | conducting this              |
|       |                              | investigation, UTA will use  |
|       |                              | guidance outlined in the FTA |
|       |                              | guidance Transit Noise and   |
|       |                              | Vibration Impact Assessment  |
|       |                              | (May 2006). Based on these   |
|       |                              | results, UTA will identify   |
|       |                              | the most effective           |
|       |                              | mitigation. Specifically     |
|       |                              | identified mitigation        |
|       |                              | measures are: special        |
|       |                              | trackwork at crossovers and  |
|       |                              | turnouts, ballast mats and   |
|       |                              | resilient fasteners. Only    |
|       |                              | approved mitigation measures |
|       |                              | from the FTA guidance or     |
|       |                              | other FTA approved vibration |
|       |                              | mitigation measures will be  |
|       |                              | employed.                    |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Water |                              |                              |
| Reso  |                              |                              |
| urces |                              |                              |
| (4.7) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-27  | The project will cross the   | Construction activities for  |
| and   | Jordan River by a new        | both crossings will require  |
| 4-31  | structure, and the Bingham   | State of Utah Stream         |
|       | creek with a new box         | Alteration Permits, which    |
|       | culvert.                     | also fulfill the             |
|       |                              | requirements of Section 404  |
|       |                              | of the Clean Water Act. Any  |
|       |                              | expansion or widening to the |
|       |                              | bridge crossing over the     |
|       |                              | Jordan River will require a  |
|       |                              | Sovereign Land easement to   |
|       |                              | mitigate any adverse affect  |
|       |                              | of sovereign land management |
|       |                              | objectives specified in Rule |
|       |                              | R652-2-200.                  |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-29  | There are two major          | Flood control permits from   |
| thru  | crossings along the          | Salt Lake County will be     |
| 4-30  | alignment where the project  | required and design must     |
|       | crosses the 100-year         | comply with FEMA floodplain  |
|       | floodplain.                  | ordinances.                  |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-30  | Increased contaminants in    | A detention basin, with      |
|       | storm water runoff at        | oil/water separators, will   |
|       | stations                     | be constructed at each       |
|       |                              | station and will be designed |
|       |                              | to release captured runoff   |
|       |                              | at pre-development flow      |
|       |                              | rates or city/county         |
|       |                              | regulatory rates, whichever  |
|       |                              | is more stringent.           |
|       |                              | Discharges into Jordan       |
|       |                              | River, Bingham Creek, Utah   |
|       |                              | Lake Distributing Canal,     |
|       |                              | Utah and Salt Lake Canal,    |
|       |                              | South Jordan Canal, and      |
|       |                              | North Jordan Canal will      |
|       |                              | require flood control        |
|       |                              | permits.                     |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Biolo |                              |                              |
| gical |                              |                              |
| Reso  |                              |                              |
| urces |                              |                              |
| (4.8) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-32  | Affects 0.323 acres of       | A mitigation and monitoring  |
| thru  | jurisdictional wetlands. No  | plan for wetlands, prepared  |
| 4-33  | effect on other waters of    | in coordination with the COE |
|       | the U.S.                     | and in conjunction with the  |
|       |                              | Section 404 permitting       |
|       |                              | process prior to             |
|       |                              | construction, will provide   |
|       |                              | detailed guidance for        |
|       |                              | implementing mitigation      |
|       |                              | measures. Initial contact    |
|       |                              | with COE indicates that a    |
|       |                              | Nation-Wide Permit 14 will   |
|       |                              | be appropriate.              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-36  | Three species of concern are | Schedule land-clearing       |
| thru  | known to reside in the       | activities to avoid the      |
| 4-37  | project area and could       | breeding season. If the bird |
|       | potentially be affected:     | breeding season cannot be    |
|       | ferruginous hawk,            | avoided, a qualified         |
|       | short-eared owl &            | ornithologist will survey    |
|       | long-billed curlew.          | the construction zone to     |
|       |                              | flag nesting areas           |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Haza  |                              |                              |
| rdous |                              |                              |
| Mate  |                              |                              |
| rials |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Haza  |                              |                              |
| rdous |                              |                              |
| W     |                              |                              |
| astes |                              |                              |
| (4.9) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-38  | Increased number of LRT      | UTA will follow standard     |
|       | vehicles requiring           | procedures to capture and    |
|       | maintenance slightly         | dispose of hazardous         |
|       | increases use of potentially | materials.                   |
|       | hazardous materials at the   |                              |
|       | TRAX Rail Service Center.    |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-39  | The Midvale Slag Site poses  | The risk to construction     |
|       | an exposure risk to          | workers will be minimized by |
|       | construction workers.        | adherence to the Operations  |
|       |                              | and Maintenance Plan, the    |
|       |                              | five-Year Review Reports and |
|       |                              | the Midvale City             |
|       |                              | Institutional Control        |
|       |                              | Process Plans (Midvale City  |
|       |                              | Council, 2004).              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-41  | Midvale Rail Yard poses an   | To ensure the smallest risk  |
|       | exposure risk to             | of Hazmat exposure, UTA will |
|       | construction workers.        | limit construction           |
|       |                              | activities to the West side  |
|       |                              | of the railroad ROW along    |
|       |                              | the Midvale Railyard site.   |
|       |                              | If this is not possible,     |
|       |                              | site samples will be         |
|       |                              | collected and analyzed in    |
|       |                              | accordance with the Safety   |
|       |                              | and Remediation Plans        |
|       |                              | developed during             |
|       |                              | preconstruction.             |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-38  | Rail Line Right-of-Way       | Where construction will      |
| thru  | presents the possibility for | occur within the railroad    |
| 4-39  | potential Hazmat             | ROW, UTA contractors will    |
|       | contamination.               | analyze soil and ground      |
|       |                              | water samples at those areas |
|       |                              | where evidence suggests that |
|       |                              | hazardous materials spills   |
|       |                              | previously have occurred. If |
|       |                              | elevated concentrations are  |
|       |                              | found, contractors will      |
|       |                              | perform additional           |
|       |                              | assessments to determine the |
|       |                              | extent of the contamination. |
|       |                              | Where Hazmat is present, UTA |
|       |                              | will take appropriate        |
|       |                              | measures to remove and       |
|       |                              | isolate the impacted media   |
|       |                              | where construction or public |
|       |                              | contact is anticipated. UTA  |
|       |                              | will follow Hazmat           |
|       |                              | contamination measures and   |
|       |                              | Safety and Remediation Plans |
|       |                              | developed during             |
|       |                              | pre-construction.            |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-40  | Kennecott South Zone         | The limits of this site will |
|       | (proposed NPL site) where    | be identified and            |
|       | there is a concern that any  | contractors will control     |
|       | fugitive dust may contain    | fugitive dust leaving the    |
|       | lead.                        | construction site.           |
|       |                              | Additionally, to reduce the  |
|       |                              | risk to workers, proper      |
|       |                              | protective equipment will be |
|       |                              | provided in accordance with  |
|       |                              | safety and remediation plans |
|       |                              | developed during             |
|       |                              | pre-construction to prevent  |
|       |                              | excessive dust inhalation.   |
|       |                              | Sampling will be conducted   |
|       |                              | at all areas where intrusive |
|       |                              | activities will occur near   |
|       |                              | Bingham Creek.               |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Util  |                              |                              |
| ities |                              |                              |
| (     |                              |                              |
| 4.10) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-46  | Based on preliminary         | Underground utilities will   |
| thru  | findings, the project will   | be potholed during final     |
| 4-47  | result in the relocation,    | design to obtain more detail |
|       | modification, or protection  | of the utility conflicts.    |
|       | of up to 250 existing        | UTA will maintain contacts   |
|       | utility lines during         | with municipalities,         |
|       | construction, including      | agencies, and companies      |
|       | storm drains, sewers, water, | throughout design.           |
|       | communication, electric, and | Mitigation measures will be  |
|       | natural gas. Overall,        | determined during final      |
|       | utility impacts will be      | design to include relocation |
|       | minimized once construction  | or protection as necessary.  |
|       | is complete.                 |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| H     |                              |                              |
| istor |                              |                              |
| ical, |                              |                              |
| Archa |                              |                              |
| eolog |                              |                              |
| ical, |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Paleo |                              |                              |
| ntolo |                              |                              |
| gical |                              |                              |
| Sites |                              |                              |
| (     |                              |                              |
| 4.12) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-53  | No impacts to archeological  | In accordance with 36 CFR    |
|       | resources or paleontological | 800.13(b), FTA and UTA will  |
|       | sites are anticipated        | provide for the protection,  |
|       |                              | evaluation and treatment of  |
|       |                              | any historic property        |
|       |                              | discovered prior to or       |
|       |                              | during construction. This    |
|       |                              | stipulation specifies        |
|       |                              | procedures to be followed by |
|       |                              | all UTA employees and all    |
|       |                              | UTA contractors and          |
|       |                              | subcontractors should any    |
|       |                              | archaeological, historic or  |
|       |                              | paleontological resources be |
|       |                              | discovered during            |
|       |                              | construction of the project. |
|       |                              | In general, these measures   |
|       |                              | include: the immediate       |
|       |                              | suspension of construction   |
|       |                              | operations, notification of  |
|       |                              | the UTA project manager,     |
|       |                              | notification of the Utah     |
|       |                              | SHPO, protection of the      |
|       |                              | discovered object(s) and     |
|       |                              | development of an            |
|       |                              | appropriate treatment plan.  |
|       |                              | In the event that human      |
|       |                              | remains are inadvertently    |
|       |                              | discovered, project related  |
|       |                              | ground disturbance within    |
|       |                              | 300 feet of the discovery    |
|       |                              | shall cease immediately.     |
|       |                              | FTA, SHPO, local officials   |
|       |                              | and likely descendant Native |
|       |                              | American Tribes shall be     |
|       |                              | notified. After              |
|       |                              | consultation, ground         |
|       |                              | disturbance may be resumed   |
|       |                              | only with written permission |
|       |                              | of the FTA. If unanticipated |
|       |                              | archeological resources are  |
|       |                              | discovered during            |
|       |                              | construction, UTA will       |
|       |                              | notify Native American       |
|       |                              | tribes who potentially have  |
|       |                              | an interest in the           |
|       |                              | archeological resources..    |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-53  | Construction of the Gardner  | UTA will provide the         |
|       | Village Station will result  | opportunity for interested   |
|       | in the demolition and        | public agencies, non-profits |
|       | destruction of the structure | and individuals to relocate  |
|       | at 1095/1099 West 7800       | the historic building. Plans |
|       | South, West Jordan.          | for relocation shall be      |
|       |                              | reviewed by a preservation   |
|       |                              | consultant who meets the     |
|       |                              | Secretary of Interior's      |
|       |                              | professional Qualification   |
|       |                              | Standards in architectural   |
|       |                              | history or historic          |
|       |                              | architecture (36 CFR part    |
|       |                              | 61) and SHPO. In the event   |
|       |                              | of demolition, prior to site |
|       |                              | preparation and construction |
|       |                              | the resource will be         |
|       |                              | documented using a state     |
|       |                              | approved intensive level     |
|       |                              | survey, and resultant        |
|       |                              | materials will be placed on  |
|       |                              | file with Utah SHPO.         |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-53  | Construction may adversely   | UTA will add a special       |
|       | effect the West Jordan Ward  | provision (Limitation of     |
|       | Meetinghouse at 1140 West    | Operations) to the           |
|       | 7800 South, West Jordan      | construction contract that   |
|       |                              | will protect historic        |
|       |                              | properties near the proposed |
|       |                              | alignment, but not directly  |
|       |                              | impacted by the project.     |
|       |                              | This provision will prohibit |
|       |                              | any ground-disturbing        |
|       |                              | activities by the general    |
|       |                              | contractor outside the area  |
|       |                              | of effect, as shown in the   |
|       |                              | design plans and delineated  |
|       |                              | by orange fencing along the  |
|       |                              | property boundaries of the   |
|       |                              | historic resources, in the   |
|       |                              | field.                       |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-53  | Construction may adversely   | The special provision for    |
|       | effect Gardner Mill at 1050  | Limitation of Operations     |
|       | West 7800 South, West Jordan | shall apply. The following   |
|       |                              | measures will ensure that    |
|       |                              | the mill would not be        |
|       |                              | adversely affected by        |
|       |                              | construction-related         |
|       |                              | vibration: 1. the maximum    |
|       |                              | rated energy of pile driving |
|       |                              | hammers will be limited, 2.  |
|       |                              | with approval of Gardner     |
|       |                              | Village, two vibration       |
|       |                              | monitors will be placed, one |
|       |                              | on the foundation and one on |
|       |                              | the upper elevation of       |
|       |                              | Gardner mill, to record      |
|       |                              | vibration levels during pile |
|       |                              | driving activities, and 3.   |
|       |                              | pile driving activities will |
|       |                              | stop, and other less         |
|       |                              | vibration-intense activities |
|       |                              | must be employed if any      |
|       |                              | vibration monitor readings   |
|       |                              | exceed 0.12 in./sec. or if   |
|       |                              | there is visual evidence     |
|       |                              | that the pile driving is     |
|       |                              | causing damage to the        |
|       |                              | structure.                   |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Parkl |                              |                              |
| ands, |                              |                              |
| Open  |                              |                              |
| Space |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| T     |                              |                              |
| rails |                              |                              |
| (     |                              |                              |
| 4.13) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-55  | No direct land use impacts;  | UTA will construct a noise   |
|       | Increased noise levels at    | barrier at Green Meadow      |
|       | Green Meadow Park. Improved  | Park.                        |
|       | access to several park       |                              |
|       | facilities in the corridor   |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-57  | One temporary construction   | UTA will provide detour      |
| and   | impact to the Jordan River   | around construction site,    |
| 4-59  | Parkway                      |                              |
|       |                              | and the trail will be        |
|       |                              | restored to its original     |
|       |                              | condition after              |
|       |                              | construction.                |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| V     |                              |                              |
| isual |                              |                              |
| Reso  |                              |                              |
| urces |                              |                              |
| (     |                              |                              |
| 4.14) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-63  | No major visual impacts;     | Context sensitive final      |
|       | however, LRT introduces      | design will blend these      |
|       | overhead contact system      | elements into the existing   |
|       | including poles and wires,   | urban setting as possible;   |
|       | noise barriers, which are    | UTA will work with local     |
|       | elements that currently      | communities.                 |
|       | exist along the corridor.    |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| P     |                              |                              |
| ublic |                              |                              |
| S     |                              |                              |
| afety |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Sec   |                              |                              |
| urity |                              |                              |
| (     |                              |                              |
| 4.15) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-64  | Increased train frequency    | UTA will use standard UTA    |
| thru  | presents added risk along    | crossing safety features,    |
| 4-65  | ROW for pedestrians and at   | such as gates and bells, to  |
|       | grade crossings for          | alert pedestrians and autos  |
|       | pedestrians and autos.       | of oncoming trains. Fencing  |
|       |                              | along ROW will reduce public |
|       |                              | access. UTA will conduct     |
|       |                              | educational outreach to      |
|       |                              | schools and the public.      |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-63  | Moderate potential for       | UTA will provide transit     |
| thru  | increase in crimes of        | police and work with local   |
| 4-64  | opportunity and need for     | emergency and law            |
|       | emergency response services  | enforcement personnel.       |
|       | at rail station locations    |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| Co    |                              |                              |
| nstru |                              |                              |
| ction |                              |                              |
| Im    |                              |                              |
| pacts |                              |                              |
| (     |                              |                              |
| 4.16) |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-66  | Construction activities and  | UTA will require that best   |
| and   | equipment have the potential | management practices (BMPs)  |
| 4-16  | to produce fugitive or       | are followed. During final   |
|       | airborne dust.               | Design, UTA will prepare a   |
|       |                              | Fugitive Dust Control Plan   |
|       |                              | to be submitted to the UDAQ  |
|       |                              | as outlined in R307-309.     |
|       |                              | Dust control pertains to all |
|       |                              | on-site activities including |
|       |                              | fugitive dust from pits,     |
|       |                              | yards, storage areas, and    |
|       |                              | parking lots. Dust control   |
|       |                              | measures include planting    |
|       |                              | vegetative or synthetic      |
|       |                              | cover, watering or chemical  |
|       |                              | stabilization, and           |
|       |                              | windbreaks.                  |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-66  | Short term increases in      | During Final Design, UTA     |
|       | levels around construction   | will complete a Construction |
|       | sites.                       | Noise Mitigation Plan that   |
|       |                              | contractors must follow      |
|       |                              | along with local ordinances  |
|       |                              | and BMPs, which can included |
|       |                              | temporary barriers, adjusted |
|       |                              | schedules, working during    |
|       |                              | daylight hours, and use of   |
|       |                              | alternate equipment. The     |
|       |                              | Noise Mitigation Plan will   |
|       |                              | be developed with the active |
|       |                              | participation of all the     |
|       |                              | affected municipalities.     |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-66  | Impacts on surface waters    | A general UPDES Construction |
|       | during construction          | permit will be obtained from |
|       | activities include potential | UDEQ and a storm water       |
|       | altered drainage paths,      | pollution prevention plan    |
|       | increases in surface water   | will be developed. BMPs will |
|       | flows, localized flooding,   | be implemented that may      |
|       | and increased pollutant      | include silt fencing,        |
|       | concentrations discharged to | retention basins, detention  |
|       | receiving waters.            | ponds, interceptor ditches,  |
|       |                              | erosion mats, spill          |
|       |                              | prevention and control       |
|       |                              | measures, and mulching.      |
|       |                              | Temporarily disturbed areas  |
|       |                              | will be re-vegetated.        |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-67  | 172.7 acres habitat          | UTA and its contractors will |
|       |                              | follow BMPs during           |
|       |                              | construction and re-vegetate |
|       |                              | following construction.      |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
|       | 0.2 acres Mountain Brush     |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-67  | Construction of the project  | UTA will develop and         |
| and   | could affect a number of     | implement BMPs and a         |
| 4-42  | known hazardous materials    | Pollution Prevention and     |
|       | sites including Operable     | Abatement plan to minimize   |
|       | Unit No. 1 -- Midvale Slag   | exposure including           |
|       | Site, Operable Unit No. 2 -- | paving/capping as part of    |
|       | Midvale Slag Site and        | construction. This will      |
|       | Operable Unit No. 1 Sharon   | include a Safety and         |
|       | Steel Site.                  | Remediation Plan. Intrusive  |
|       |                              | activities (construction,    |
|       |                              | investigative or otherwise)  |
|       |                              | at these sites must be       |
|       |                              | conducted in accordance with |
|       |                              | the Operations and           |
|       |                              | Maintenance Plans            |
|       |                              | implemented following        |
|       |                              | implementation of the        |
|       |                              | remedies, the Five Year      |
|       |                              | Review reports and           |
|       |                              | Institutional Control        |
|       |                              | Process plans that were      |
|       |                              | instituted by the Midvale    |
|       |                              | City Council in 2004. In     |
|       |                              | addition, worker exposure to |
|       |                              | impacted media will be       |
|       |                              | minimized and proper         |
|       |                              | training and protective      |
|       |                              | equipment utilized.          |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-67  | There may be temporary       | UTA will contact and         |
|       | disruption of utility and    | coordinate with utility      |
|       | railroad services during     | companies and agencies prior |
|       | construction activities.     | to construction to minimize  |
|       |                              | disturbance to system users. |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-68  | Potential for encountering   | If any cultural resources    |
|       | unknown cultural resources   | are encountered during       |
|       | during construction          | construction activities,     |
|       | activities.                  | construction will cease and  |
|       |                              | materials will be evaluated  |
|       |                              | in accordance with 36 CFR    |
|       |                              | 800.13. UTA will coordinate  |
|       |                              | with the SHPO prior to       |
|       |                              | resuming construction        |
|       |                              | activities.                  |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-68  | Temporary impacts to         | UTA contractors will develop |
|       | traffic, pedestrians, and    | and implement a traffic      |
|       | bicyclists could include     | management plan during       |
|       | construction delays,         | construction to assure       |
|       | re-routing, and temporary    | access to residences,        |
|       | lane closures.               | businesses, community        |
|       |                              | facilities and services, and |
|       |                              | local roads.                 |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-66  | There will be construction   | UTA will establish a public  |
|       | related impacts to the       | information program during   |
|       | public such as access to     | the construction phase to    |
|       | homes and businesses,        | advise the public about      |
|       | traffic control, and         | construction scheduling,     |
|       | construction noise and       | traffic detouring, and other |
|       | vibration.                   | concerns.                    |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| **Ind |                              |                              |
| irect |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Cumul |                              |                              |
| ative |                              |                              |
| Ef    |                              |                              |
| fects |                              |                              |
| (4.   |                              |                              |
| 17)** |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-70  | Cumulative adverse effects   | Mitigation measures include  |
|       | to surface waters and        | collection of storm water    |
|       | floodplains from ground      | runoff in catch basins to    |
|       | disturbing activities and    | filter the water prior to    |
|       | increased sedimentation and  | infiltration into local      |
|       | runoff could be significant. | groundwater.                 |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| **Su  |                              |                              |
| mmary |                              |                              |
| of    |                              |                              |
| A     |                              |                              |
| gency |                              |                              |
| Pe    |                              |                              |
| rmits |                              |                              |
| and   |                              |                              |
| Co    |                              |                              |
| ordin |                              |                              |
| ation |                              |                              |
| (4.   |                              |                              |
| 18)** |                              |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| 4-71  | The project will involve     | See Attachment C, Table      |
| thru  | coordination with federal,   | 4-18-1, for the required     |
| 4-72  | state and local agencies,    | permits and agency           |
|       | including application for    | coordination contacts.       |
|       | permits to meet regulatory   |                              |
|       | requirements.                |                              |
+-------+------------------------------+------------------------------+

**ATTACHMENT B**

+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| **LRT Parking |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Spaces**      |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| **Station     | *    |      |     |     | **20 |      |     |   |
| Location**    | *Ope |      |     |     | 30** |      |     |   |
|               | ning |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
|               | Ye   |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
|               | ar** |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
|               | **   | *    | *   | **T | **   | *    | *   | * |
|               | Dema | *Exc | *Sh | ota | Dema | *Exc | *Sh | * |
|               | nd** | lusi | are | l** | nd** | lusi | are | T |
|               |      | ve** | d** |     |      | ve** | d** | o |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | t |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | a |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | l |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | * |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | * |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| 6400          | 70   | 100  | 0   | 10  | 126  | 100  | 0   | 1 |
| South/Fashion |      |      |     | 0\* |      |      |     | 0 |
| Place W       |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | \ |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | * |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| Bingham       | 72   | 0    | 2   | 200 | 128  | 0    | 200 | 2 |
| Junction      |      |      | 00\ |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      | *\* |     |      |      |     | 0 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| Gardner       | 89   | 88   | 112 | 200 | 158  | 88   | 112 | 2 |
| Village       |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| Redwood       | 180  | 221  | 0   | 221 | 322  | 412  | 188 | 6 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| 2700 West     | 153  | 205  | 0   | 205 | 274  | 409  | 0   | 4 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 9 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| Bangerter     | 507  | 577  | 268 | 845 | 905  | 577  | 268 | 8 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 4 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 5 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| 4800 West     | 103  | 244  | 0   | 244 | 184  | 244  | 0   | 2 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 4 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 4 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| 5600 West     | 309  | 420  | 0   | 420 | 552  | 630  | 0   | 6 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 3 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| Daybreak      | 206  | 0    | 200 | 200 | 368  | 0    | 400 | 4 |
| North         |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| Daybreak      | 206  | 0    | 400 | 400 | 368  | 0    | 600 | 6 |
| South         |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 0 |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| **TOTAL**     | *    | *    | **1 | **3 | *    | *    | **1 | * |
|               | *1,8 | *1,8 | ,18 | ,03 | *3,3 | *2,4 | ,76 | * |
|               | 96** | 55** | 0** | 5** | 85** | 60** | 8** | 4 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | , |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 2 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 2 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | 8 |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | * |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     | * |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| \*Note: There |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| are currently |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| 209 parking   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| stalls at the |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| 6400          |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| South/Fashion |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Place West    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| station,      |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| which was     |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| built as part |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| of the        |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Sandy/Salt    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Lake line. As |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| the lot       |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| currently     |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| operates at   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| approximately |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| 70% capacity, |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| 100           |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| additional    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| parking       |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| stalls will   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| be built as   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| part of the   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Mid-Jordan    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Project for a |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| total of 309  |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| parking       |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| stalls        |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| available.    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
|               |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| \*\* Note:    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Shared        |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| parking will  |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| be            |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| implemented   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| in            |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| conjunction   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| with the      |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Bingham       |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Junction      |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| development.  |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| It is         |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| anticipated   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| to be built   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| by 2010, in   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| conjunction   |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| with opening  |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| of the        |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| Mid-Jordan    |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
| project.      |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+
| *.*           |      |      |     |     |      |      |     |   |
+---------------+------+------+-----+-----+------+------+-----+---+

**ATTACHMENT** C

+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Required       |           |            |                         |
| Permits and      |           |            |                         |
| Agency           |           |            |                         |
| Coordination**   |           |            |                         |
+==================+===========+============+=========================+
| **Name of        | *         | **R        | **Contact**             |
| Permi            | *Agency** | eference** |                         |
| t/Coordination** |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Air Quality**  |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Dust Control     | Utah      | Utah       | Ms. Cindy Deem          |
| Plan             | Division  | Admi       |                         |
|                  | of Air    | nistrative | Utah Division of Air    |
|                  | Quality   | Code (UAC) | Quality                 |
|                  |           | R307-309   |                         |
|                  |           |            | 150 North 1950 West     |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, Utah    |
|                  |           |            | 84116                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Surface        |           |            |                         |
| Waters**         |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| UPDES Storm      | Utah      | UAC        | Mr. Thomas Rushing      |
| Water General    | Division  | R317-8-3.9 |                         |
| Permit           | of Water  |            | Utah Division of Water  |
|                  | Quality   |            | Quality                 |
| for Construction |           |            |                         |
| Activities       |           |            | 288 North 1460 West     |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | P.O. Box 144870         |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, UT      |
|                  |           |            | 84114                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| UPDES General    | Utah      | UAC R317-8 | Mr. Harry Campbell      |
| Permit for       | Division  |            |                         |
| Construction     | of Water  |            | Utah Division of Water  |
| Dewatering/      | Quality   |            | Quality                 |
| Hydrostatic      |           |            |                         |
| Testing (if any  |           |            | 288 North 1460 West     |
| de               |           |            |                         |
| watering/pumping |           |            | P.O. Box 144870         |
| of ground or     |           |            |                         |
| ditch water at   |           |            | Salt Lake City, UT      |
| the site)        |           |            | 84114                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Stream           | Utah      | Utah Code  | Mr. Chuck Williamson    |
| Alteration       | Division  | 73-3-29    |                         |
| Permit           | of Water  |            | Utah Division of Water  |
|                  | Rights    |            | Rights                  |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | 1594 West North Temple, |
|                  |           |            | Suite 220               |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, UT      |
|                  |           |            | 84114                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Section 404      | U.S. Army | U.S. Code  | Ms. Anna Langdon        |
| Clean Water Act  | Corps of  | Title 33   |                         |
|                  | Engineers |            | U.S. Army Corps of      |
| (Wetland Permit) |           | Chapter 26 | Engineers, Sacramento   |
|                  |           |            | District                |
|                  |           | Clean      |                         |
|                  |           | Water Act  | 533 West 2600 South,    |
|                  |           |            | Suite 150               |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Bountiful, UT           |
|                  |           |            | 84010-7744              |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Surface        |           |            |                         |
| Waters,          |           |            |                         |
| continued**      |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Sovereign Lands  | Utah      | UAC        | Mr. Barry Trip          |
| Easement         | Division  | R652-2-200 |                         |
|                  | of        |            | Utah Division of        |
|                  | Forestry, |            | Forestry, Fire, and     |
|                  | Fire, and |            | State Lands             |
|                  | State     |            |                         |
|                  | Lands     |            | 1594 West North Temple, |
|                  |           |            | Suite 3520              |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | PO Box 145703           |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, Utah    |
|                  |           |            | 84114-5703              |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Floodplains**  |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Flood Control    | Salt Lake | Title      | Mr. Chris Springer      |
| Permit           | County    | 17/Chapter |                         |
|                  |           | 8 of the   | Salt Lake County Public |
|                  |           | Ordinances | Works Department        |
|                  |           | of Salt    |                         |
|                  |           | Lake       | Engineering Division    |
|                  |           | County     |                         |
|                  |           |            | 2001 South State Street |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, Utah    |
|                  |           |            | 84190-4600              |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| NFIP Elevation   | FEMA      | Executive  | FEMA Region 8           |
| Certificates (to |           | Order      |                         |
| obtain Letter of |           | 11988      | Attention: LOMA Manager |
| Map Revision)    |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | LOMA Depot              |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Building 710, Box 25267 |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Denver, CO 80225-0267   |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | []{.mark}               |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Hazardous      |           |            |                         |
| Materials**      |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Utah Department  | Utah      | \-         | Mr. Dale Marx           |
| of Environmental | Division  |            |                         |
| Quality          | of        |            | Utah Division of        |
| Coordination     | Envi      |            | Environmental Response  |
|                  | ronmental |            | and Remediation         |
|                  | Response  |            |                         |
|                  | and       |            | 168 North 1950 West     |
|                  | Re        |            |                         |
|                  | mediation |            | Box 144840              |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, Utah    |
|                  |           |            | 84114-4840              |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Vegetation**   |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Salt Lake County | Salt Lake | \-         | Mr. Phil McCraley       |
| Noxious Weed     | County,   |            |                         |
| Control          | Public    |            | Salt Lake County Public |
| Coordination     | Works     |            | Works                   |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | 2001 South State        |
|                  |           |            | Street, Suite N4100     |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, UT      |
|                  |           |            | 84190                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| **Cultural**     |           |            |                         |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+
| Section 106      | State     | 36 CFR     | Ms. Barbara Murphy      |
| Consultation and | Historic  | Part 800   |                         |
| Cultural         | Pre       |            | Utah State Historic     |
| Coordination     | servation | Section    | Preservation Office     |
|                  | Officer   | 106        |                         |
|                  |           |            | Division of State       |
|                  |           |            | History                 |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | 300 Rio Grande          |
|                  |           |            |                         |
|                  |           |            | Salt Lake City, UT      |
|                  |           |            | 84101-1182              |
+------------------+-----------+------------+-------------------------+