U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

H O U S I N G

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Special Attention of: Notice H 93-45 (HUD)

All Regional Administrators,

Directors, Office of Regional Issued: 4/9/93

Housing; Managers, Category A Expires: 4/30/94

and Category B Offices; and
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Field Office Housing Development Cross References:

Division Directors, Category A Handbook 4571.2 Disabled

Category B Offices Handbook 4571.3 REV-1 Elderly

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Subject: Fiscal Year 1993 Policy for Capital Advance Authority

Assignments, Instructions and Additional Program

Requirements for the Section 202 and Section 811

Capital Advance Programs

1\. GENERAL. The National Affordable Housing Act (NAH Act)

under section 801 modified the Section 202 program to

provide for capital advances for Supportive Housing for the

Elderly and under Section 811 provides for a separate

program of capital advances for Supportive Housing for

Persons with Disabilities. The Section 811 program replaced

the portion of the Section 202 program which provided

housing for disabled persons.

2\. PURPOSE. This Notice transmits Field Office allocations for

Section 202, Regional Office allocations for Section 811 and

Regional Minority Business Enterprise Goals for Fiscal Year

1993\. In addition, this Notice transmits, as Attachment 2,

important modifications to the Section 811 program, and, as

Attachment 2B, Section 811 revised technical review sheets.

This Notice should be used in conjunction with the Interim

Rules (Parts 889 or 890), the appropriate Federal Register

Notice of Fund Availability, and Handbook 4571.2 Section 811

Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities or Handbook

4571.3 REV-1- Section 202 Supportive Housing for the

Elderly.

Major changes have been made to the Section 202 and Section

811 programs for Fiscal year 1993. For details of these and

other program changes, refer to this Notice, 1993 NOFAs, Interim

Rules and Revised Section 202 Handbook.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

HMEE: Distribution: W-3-1,W-2(H),W-3(H),(FHEO)(ZAS)(PD&R),R-1,R-2,R-3,

R-3-1,R-3-3,R-6,R-6-1,R-6-2,R-7,R-7-1,R-7-2,W-4(H),

R-3-1(H)(RC),R-8,R-8-1

Previous Editions Are Obsolete HUD 21 B(3-80)

GPO 871 902

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2

Highlights of the major changes are as follows:

\- Application packages for both 202 and 811 have been

developed, and should be made available to all

applicants.

\- A narrative description of the project design is

required at the fund reservation stage. Drawings are

to be submitted at the conditional commitment stage.

\- Preliminary rejections of applications have been

ELIMINATED. All applications must receive a complete

review.

\- The Mortgage Credit review has been ELIMINATED at the

fund reservation stage. This review will occur at the

conditional commitment stage.

\- Technical review sheets have been modified to

incorporate program changes. For Section 202, see

Handbook 4571.3 REV-1 and for Section 811, see

Attachment 2B of this Notice.

\- The site option agreement for sites under control,

must extend through the end of the fiscal year with a

provision to renew the option for an additional six

months.

\- For properties to be acquired from the Resolution Trust

corporation, a copy of the RTC prepared Transaction

Screen Checklist or Phase I Environmental Site

Assessment and applicable documentation, per the RTC

Environmental Guidelines, must be included in the

application.

\- For Section 202 ONLY, the Minimum Capital Investment

has been reduced for non-national sponsors to one-half

of one-percent of the Capital Advance amount, not to

exceed ten-thousand dollars.

\- For Section 202 ONLY, the Supportive Services

Certification has been ELIMINATED.

3\. FISCAL YEAR 1993 CAPITAL ADVANCE AUTHORITY ASSIGNMENTS

a\. Fair Share Factors. Although Section 811 is not

subject to the Section 213(d) requirements, formulae

are still used for allocating both Sections 202 and 811

funds. The allocation formulae for the elderly and the

disabled categories were developed to reflect the

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

3

\"relevant characteristics of prospective program

participants\", as specified in 24 CFR 791.402(a). Each

formula consists of two elements.

Elderly Housing Formula

The data elements in the Section 202 Elderly Allocation

are:

\(1\) A measure of the total number of elderly renter

households; and

\(2\) A measure of the number of one- and two-person

elderly renter households with incomes at or below

the very-low-income standard with housing

deficiencies, consisting primarily of households

paying more than 30 percent of their incomes for

rent.

The formula utilizes the 1980 Census data which provide

cross tabulations of elderly renter households by size

of household, household income and housing condition.

These data are then updated by applying the percentage

change in elderly population (age 65 or older) to the

latest possible date, based on estimates developed by

the Bureau of the Census using the administrative

records of the Department of Health and Human Services

on the number of persons receiving Medicare.

Housing for the Disabled Formula

The data elements in the Section 811 Housing for

Persons with Disabilities Allocation are:

\(1\) A measure of the number of persons identified as

having a public transportation disability; and

\(2\) A measure of the number of persons identified as

having a work disability.

The formula utilizes the 1980 Census which tabulated:

\(1\) the number of persons with health conditions that

had lasted six months or more and made it difficult or

impossible to use public transportation; and (2) the

number of persons with health conditions that had

lasted six months or more which either limited the

kinds of work they can do, their choice of jobs or

prevented them from working. The formula provides for

equal weighting of each of the elements.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

4

Formulae Calculation Procedures

The data elements for each formula were compiled for

every county (or county equivalent) to Field Office

jurisdiction and national totals; in the case of

Section 202, it also was aggregated separately by

metropolitan (metro) and nonmetropolitan (nonmetro)

areas. Further, the basic factors were adjusted to

take into consideration the relative differences in the

costs of providing housing among the Field Offices

jurisdictions.

b\. Programs Fund Assignments. Based upon Regional Office

comments transfers between metro and nonmetro were

accommodated as long as the overall nonmetro allocation

met the Congressionally-mandated 15 percent minimum for

nonmetro areas nationwide. Such transfers were

permitted for known soft market areas or where

experience indicated a lack of eligible sponsors. No

changes were made in the Section 811 allocations.

The issuance of the HUD-185, Regional Fund and Contract

Authority Assignment, and the subsequent subassignment

by the Region (HUD-185.1) will be made when all of the

selections for the FY 1993 program are finalized.

4\. FIELD OFFICE ALLOCATIONS.

a\. Elderly Housing Allocations.

Section 213(d) of the Housing and Community Development

Act of 1974, as amended by the Department of Housing

and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (HUD Reform

Act), provides that allocations of funds be made to the

smallest practicable areas consistent with the delivery

of assistance through meaningful competition. Section

213(d), as amended, also states that program funding

under Section 202 shall be allocated in a manner that

ensures selections of projects of sufficient size to

accommodate facilities for supportive services

appropriate to the needs of frail elderly residents.

In order to meet the intent of the Reform Act, the

following rules will apply to the FY 1993 Section 202

allocations.

\(1\) Field Offices are required to establish allocation

areas only for the respective metro and nonmetro

assignments of capital advance authority for the

entire Field Office jurisdiction. Therefore, all

applications received from metropolitan areas will

compete with each other and all applications from

nonmetro areas will compete against each other.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

5

\(2\) There is minimum proposal size of 40 units and a

maximum of 125 units for projects in metro areas.

In the nonmetro areas, there is no minimum, but

there is a maximum of 125 units per application.

For Fiscal Year 1993, not less than 15 percent of

the available funds are to be allocated for

non-metro areas. This is a reduction from the 20

percent requirement in Fiscal Year 1992.

Where the Field Office allocation in either the

metro or nonmetro areas is less than 125, the

maximum proposal size will be limited by the

allocated amount. Among other requirements, to be

considered responsive to the NOFA, an applicant

must not request a larger number of units than

permitted for the respective metro and/or nonmetro

areas designated in the NOFA and must not exceed

the maximum number of units per application as

established herein. (see Attachment 1)

b\. Allocations for Section 811 Housing for the Disabled.

General. The allocations for Section 811 housing for

the disabled are not subject to the Section 213(d)

requirements including the control on nonmetro funding

and the requirement for a formula allocation.

Accordingly, there will not be any division of funding

between the metro and nonmetro areas. We will, however

continue funding the program on a formula basis.

Due to the limited funding for the Section 811 program,

and the resulting problem of achieving project

feasibility if the funds were allocated to the Field

Offices, Section 811 funds will be allocated to the

Regional Offices as they have been for the past four

fiscal years. Although the competition for funding

will be Region-wide, Field Offices will review the

applications and participate in the rating process.

Selection, however, will be made on the basis of

Regional rank order. (see Attachment 2A)

c\. Field Office Funding Notifications. This paragraph

expands on Paragraph 2-1 and Appendix 5 of Handbook

4571.3 REV-1. All Field Offices shall issue Funding

Notifications for Section 202 and Section 811 in

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

6

accordance with this paragraph and the above Handbook

references. See Attachment 2C of this Notice for

Section 811 Funding Notification instructions and

format.

The funding notification format shall be used by all

Field Offices with no deviations. If a Field Office

proposes to combine the Section 202 and Section 811

funding notifications, prior approval of Headquarters

is required.

Although previous advertising requirements have been

eliminated, Offices must notify potential applicants by

following the instructions in Handbook 4571.3 REV-1 and

Attachment 2C of this Notice.

5\. CHAS CERTIFICATION. Each applicant is to submit a

certification by the jurisdiction in which the proposed

project is to be located that the application is consistent

with the jurisdiction HUD-approved CHAS for FY 1993. The

certification is to be signed by the unit of general local

government or by the State, as appropriate.

However, if the required certification is to be made by a

unit of general local government with respect to an

abbreviated CHAS, and the CHAS has been submitted to HUD by

the application submission deadline but has not yet been

approved by HUD, the application deadline will not be

applied to the certification for consistency. Instead, the

application must include a written statement from the public

official responsible for submitting the CHAS that the

jurisdiction has submitted an abbreviated CHAS for FY 1993

for HUD approval and that the application is consistent with

the CHAS. If HUD approves the CHAS, then the Field Office

must request the certification from the public official

responsible. The approval of the CHAS and the receipt of

the required certification must be completed by August 31,

1993 in order for the application to be acceptable. If the

Field Office does not approve the CHAS in time to receive

the jurisdiction\'s certificate of approval by August 31,

1993, the application must be rejected.

6\. FIELD OFFICE WORKSHOPS. To the extent possible, experienced

program and technical staff should conduct the

workshops in order to provide the guidance needed,

particularly by new program participants. Therefore, if at

all possible, the person(s) who attended program training

should be actively involved.

Since first time applicants may have difficulty with the

complexity of the Section 202 and 811 programs, offices are

urged to conduct pre-workshops (to be held prior to the

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

7

start of the regularly scheduled session) for first tine

applicants. These applicants should attend the pre-workshop

and remain for the regular session.

Particular emphasis should be placed on the differences in

the application requirements for the Section 202 and Section

811 programs. (NOTE: The FY 1993 Section 202 and 811

programs have undergone revisions, therefore, it is not

recommended that the previously issued instructional video

be used for the FY 1993 programs.)

7\. REPORTING. Under separate cover, Regional offices will be

sent instructions and a Data Diskette containing a DBASE III

Plus file structured to record all required information for

FY 1993 projects, plus files configured to print out the

three lists (i.e., (1) initial selections, (2) approvable,

but unfunded, applications and (3) applications which failed

to meet the threshold score of 50 points).

8\. MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOALS. The Department

encourages participation of the Minority Business Enterprise

(MBE) sector in HUD programs. Therefore, MBE goals

(expressed in dollars and units) have been established as

set forth below. A minority Sponsor is one in which more

than 50 percent of the board members are minority (i.e.,

Black, Hispanic, Native American, Asian Pacific, Asian

Indian, or Hasidic Jewish). The Regional Administrators

and Field Office Managers are expected to encourage

participation by minority sponsors.

\(1\) Section 202 Elderly Housing:

MBE Goals

Region Units Dollars

\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I 48 \$ 3,502,702

II 338 \$ 26,137,869

III 185 \$ 11,334,802

IV 397 \$ 20,422,910

V 224 \$ 13,816,390

VI 171 \$ 8,270,404

VII 37 \$ 1,940,591

VIII 20 \$ 999,309

IX 364 \$ 26,720,220

X 19 \$ 1,146,603

\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

1,803 \$114,291,800

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

8

\(2\) Section 811 Housing for the Disabled:

MBE Goals

Region Units Dollars

\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I 5 \$ 311,353

II 29 \$ 2,206,541

III 26 \$ 1,536,657

IV 65 \$ 3,263,080

V 29 \$ 1,717,658

VI 29 \$ 1,341,664

VII 5 \$ 236,960

VIII 4 \$ 100,331

IX 45 \$ 3,105,039

X 4 \$ 144,722

\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

241 \$13,964,005

9\. NOTIFICATION TO PROGRAM APPLICANTS. A copy of this Notice

shall be included in all Application Packages. Sponsors

must be advised that all applications submitted under the FY

1993 program must be in conformance with this Notice as well

as the appropriate Federal Register Notice of Fund

Availability, Handbooks and Field Office Funding

Notification. To this end, Fiscal Year 1993 applications

must follow the format provided in the Section 202 or

Section 811 application package, which is in accordance with

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-511) and has

been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

for approval.

10\. PROCESSING SCHEDULE.

In accordance with the schedule included in the Announcement

of Fund Availability published in the Federal Register, the

following processing schedule has been developed. It is not

mandatory that Field Offices maintain this schedule at all

times. However, the underscored dates and actions are

specific deadlines which must be met:

Application Deadline June 21, 1993

Initial Screening Completed July 1, 1993

Technical Processing Completed August 6, 1993

Notify Sponsors of Technical Rejects August 10, 1993

Appeal Period Ends August 24, 1993

Field Office Panel August 27, 1993

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

9

Field Offices submit list of

approvable applications to

Regional Offices August 31, 1993

Regional Offices submit selection

recommendations to Headquarters September 13, 1993

11\. RELEASE OF SECTION 202 AND SECTION 811 RATINGS AND RANKINGS.

Release of information regarding selections or nonselections

is prohibited until after funding announcements are made in

September. Field Offices may not release selection letters

until authorized to do so by Headquarters. It is the policy

of the Department to operate an open selection system. In

line with this policy, release of rating and ranking

information to Section 202/811 applicants or their

authorized representatives is permitted, but only after the

release of selection letters. If rating sheets or technical

review sheets are requested, they may also be released.

However, the name of the reviewer may be deleted from the

copy released to the applicant.

The above information may also be released to any member of

the public requesting such information under the Freedom of

Information Act. The handling of such requests shall be the

same as for other FOIA requests.

12\. HUD Reform Act Provisions. As required by the HUD Reform

Act, the Department will publish the funding decisions in

the Federal Register at the conclusion of the funding cycle.

Field office staff also are reminded that the HUD Reform Act

prohibits advance disclosure of funding decisions. Also see

24 CFR Part 12 which was published in the Federal Register

on March 14, 1991.

Programmatic questions concerning the FY 1993 Section 202

and Section 811 programs may be discussed with the Headquarters

Production Branch staff (FTS 202-708-2866). Questions concerning

MIPS should be directed to Eva Lantz, Housing Information and

Statistics Division, (FTS 202-708-2190).

Questions concerning Section 202 and Section 811 Capital

Advance or Project Rental Assistance Contract Authority should be

directed to the Fund Control Division (FTS 202-708-2750).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Associate General Deputy Assistant

Secretary

Attachments

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 1-1

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FISCAL YEAR 1993 ALLOCATIONS FOR SUPPORTIVE

HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 1-2

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FISCAL YEAR 1993 SECTION 202 ALLOCATIONS

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 1-3

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FISCAL YEAR 1993 SECTION 202 ALLOCATIONS

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 1-4

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FISCAL YEAR 1993 SECTION 202 ALLOCATIONS

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2-1

FY 93 SECTION 811 PROGRAM MODIFICATIONS

The following represent the major changes to the Section 811

Program for FY 1993.

a\. Applicant Eligibility. Section 603 of the Housing and

Community Development Act of 1992 (HCD Act of 1992) amended

Section 811 of the NAHA by expanding the definition of

private nonprofit organization in Section 811(k)(6) to

include public and unincorporated institutions or

foundations. It also requires such private nonprofit

organizations to have received or have temporary clearance

to receive, tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the

Internal Revenue Service Code of 1986. The Section 811

Program was not previously limited to nonprofits with

Section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. The same requirements

apply to the owner except that the owner must be

incorporated.

b\. Site Control and Identification. Sites under control and

sites identified will be evaluated using the same review

factors. However, applications with sites identified will

now have to specifically include information on how the site

will promote greater housing opportunities for minorities

and any other information on the suitability of the site for

persons with disabilities.

If, in the case of a site identified, the evidence provided

in the site description is not sufficient to lead to the

conclusion that the Sponsor will have site control within

six months, the application will be rejected.

If evidence of site control is rejected, the project is

still eligible to receive points for suitability of site,

but falls into Category B. If the site is rejected, the

application also must be placed in Category B but receives

no points for suitability of site.

c\. Davis-Bacon Act. Labor standards have been amended as they

relate to Section 811 housing. Instead of applying to

housing designed for use by 12 or more persons with

disabilities, they now apply to housing containing 12 or

more units. Since a group home is considered as one unit,

the labor standards do not apply. Group homes funded in

Fiscal Year 1993 will not be covered by the labor standards.

Independent living facilities with 12 or more units are

covered by the standards.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2-2

d\. Maximum Person Limits. The maximum number of persons with

disabilities in an independent living facility is changed to

allow 24 persons for all disability types. Consequently,

Independent living facilities for persons with chronic

mental illness are no longer capped at 20 persons.

e\. Supportive Services. The review of supportive services no

longer includes a review for appropriateness of the services

for the proposed occupancy group.

A modification has been made in the required letter of

intent. A Sponsor must obtain one or more of the following:

a\) a letter from a funding source committing funds;

b\) a letter of intent from a Community Mental Health

Center, for instance, to provide services to

project residents; or

c\) a letter from a service provider stating that

project residents will be eligible to access

available services in the community.

If the Sponsor will be the sole service provider, using its

own funds to provide the services, a letter from the Sponsor

indicating its capability and commitment to either provide

or ensure provision of the supportive services for the life

of the project is required.

The service plan should be rated based on the needs of the

tenants as demonstrated in the application. Applications

for populations requiring less intensive services should not

be rated down if an elaborate services package is not

included in the application. For example, accessibility may

be the principal need of persons with physical disabilities

in becoming independent in the community. High functioning

persons with mental disabilities in independent living

facilities may require only occasional support in

combination with existing community services.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2A

FISCAL YEAR 1993 ALLOCATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING

FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

CAPITAL

REGION ADVANCE UNITS

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I\...\...\...\...\...\...\..... \$ 8,756,828 121

II\...\...\...\...\...\...\.... \$ 20,257,582 267

III\...\...\...\...\...\...\... \$ 16,354,643 273

IV\...\...\...\...\...\...\.... \$ 25,917,193 514

V\...\...\...\...\...\...\..... \$ 24,175,881 400

VI\...\...\...\...\...\...\.... \$ 11,118,141 233

VII\...\...\...\...\...\...\... \$ 4,353,977 84

VIII\...\...\...\...\...\..... \$ 2,537,260 51

IX\...\...\...\...\...\...\.... \$ 22,870,247 328

X\...\...\...\...\...\...\..... \$ 3,298,298 55

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

National Total\...\...\... \$139,640,050 2,326

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-1

SECTION 811 CAPITAL ADVANCE

APPLICATION FOR FUND RESERVATION

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDA FORMATS

Instructions:

1\. The attached contains 8 separate suggested memoranda formats

for use by the reviewing disciplines during technical

processing at the fund reservation stage. The memoranda

formats provide for:

\- the assignment of recommended ranking points by the

reviewing discipline for the Section 811 Rating Panel.

\- identification of all required findings and applicable

program instructions.

\- identification of substantive comments by the reviewer.

2\. If the reviewing discipline discovers that an exhibit or

part of an exhibit is missing which was not identified

during initial screening, the MHR should be immediately

notified. The MHR shall telephone the Sponsor and request

the missing information to be submitted within 10 days from

the date of the telephone call. The MHR shall also request

this information on the same day by certified mail.

3\. Review Disciplines Summary: MHR shall complete the

following:

Reviewing Office Recommendation 1/

Acceptable Not Acceptable

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

MHR \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

AE&C \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

VAL \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

EMAS \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FH&EO \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

HM \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Counsel \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

CPD \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

1/ If an application receives a \"not acceptable\" recommendation,

it should not be considered by the Rating Panel.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-2

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

\- MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REPRESENTATIVE (MHR)

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
MHR

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor\'s Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per
Struct.:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application has been reviewed and the MHR\'s

findings are as follows:

1\. The proposed facilities and intended occupants are eligible

under the Section 811 program.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, the application must be rejected.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2\. The Sponsor has previous experience in developing and/or

operating housing, medical or other facilities, such as, but

not limited to, rehabilitation centers, clinics, day care or

treatment centers and/or the provision of services to

persons with disabilities, the elderly, families or minority

groups, preferably, but not necessarily, among those in the

low- and moderate-income categories.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, the application must be rejected.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-3

(Technical Processing - MHR) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

3\. The Sponsor/Co-Sponsor submitted a board resolution stating

a specific dollar amount sufficient to cover the required

minimum capital investment.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, was a board resolution provided

by another organization to furnish these

funds or a combination thereof?

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, the application must be rejected.

If Yes, name of organization \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

4\. The Sponsor submitted properly executed Exhibits including

Certifications.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, the application must be rejected.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

5\. The likelihood that the Sponsor will have site control (if

not already in control of a site) within six months of

receiving a notice of Section 811 Capital Advance.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, the application must be rejected.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

6\. Did the State/local agency certification indicate that the

provision of supportive services is well designed to meet

the special needs of the persons with disabilities the

housing is intended to serve?

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_ If No, and the agency would be a major

funding or referral source for the proposed project, the

application must be rejected.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-4

(Technical Processing - MHR) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

NOTE: Any application that must be rejected based on a \"No\"

response to any of the above questions, must be rated. However,

the application will not be ranked. The applicant will not be

notified of the rejection until technical processing has been

completed.

RATING FACTORS

1\. In determining the Sponsor\'s ability to develop and operate

the proposed housing on a long-term basis, consider:

\(a\) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor\'s

experience in providing housing or related services to

those proposed to be served by the project and the

scope of the proposed project (i.e., number of units,

services, relocation costs, development, and operation)

in relationship to the Sponsor\'s demonstrated

development and management capacity (32 points

maximum).

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(c\) The extent of local community support for the Sponsor\'s

activities, including previous experience in serving

the area where the project is to be located, and

Sponsor\'s demonstrated ability to enlist volunteers and

local funds (10 points maximum).

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-5

(Technical Processing - MHR) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

3\. In determining the adequacy of the provision of supportive

services, and of the proposed facility, consider the

following: (20 points maximum)

\(a\) The extent to which the Sponsor has demonstrated that

the identified supportive services will be provided on

a consistent, long-term basis - strength of commitments

to fund or provide the supportive services or

indications of the availability of supportive services

to project residents. (10 points maximum).

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(b\) The quality of the services implementation plan (10

points maximum).

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

In summary, the subject application is acceptable.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Signature of MHR Date

NOTE: ALL OF THE EXHIBITS WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE

ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-6

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

\- ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING, AND COST BRANCH (A&E)

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
Chief, Architectural,

Engineering and Cost

Branch

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor\'s Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application has been reviewed and Architectural,

Engineering and Cost\'s findings are as follows:

RATING FACTORS

3\. In determining adequacy of the provision of supportive

services and of the proposed facility, consider:

(5 points maximum)

\(c\) The extent to which the proposed design will meet any

special needs of persons with disabilities the housing

is intended to serve and will accommodate the provision

of any necessary on-site services for the proposed

residents (5 points maximum).

NOTE: If the proposed population does not have any

special needs requiring special design features and

there will not be any on-site services, give the

application the full 5 points.

Recommended rating:

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-7

(Technical Processing - A&E) continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The application is acceptable from an Architectural,

Engineering and cost viewpoint.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Signature of Reviewer Date

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 19, AND 20 WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE

ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-8

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

\- VALUATION BRANCH

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_, Chief
Appraiser, Valuation Branch

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application has been reviewed and Valuation\'s

comments are as follows:

The Sponsor has: site control \_\_\_\_\_ or identified a site
\_\_\_\_\_.

NOTES: 1) If the Sponsor did not submit either evidence of

site control or an identified site, the application must be

rejected. The application will still be rated as a whole but

will not be ranked. The applicant will not be notified of the

rejection until technical processing has been completed.

2\) If the Sponsor is proposing a scattered-site project with

some sites under control and some identified, the application

must be treated as a site identified application, rated under

Criterion 2 (b) and (c) and, if approvable, placed in Category

B.

RATING FACTOR

2\. In determining the need for supportive housing for persons

with disabilities in the area to be served, the extent to

which the Sponsor has site control, and the suitability of

the site, consider: (25 points maximum)

\(b\) Proximity or accessibility of the site to shopping,

medical facilities, transportation, places of

worship, recreational facilities, and other necessary

services for the intended occupants, adequacy of

utilities and streets (site control projects only),

freedom of the site from adverse environmental

conditions (site control projects only) and

compliance with the site and neighborhood standards.

(10 points maximum)

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-9

(Technical Processing - Valuation) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The following additional findings have been made:

\(1\) The number of units and bedroom sizes are marketable.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(2\) The proposed site is located outside the 100-year

floodplain (or 500-year floodplain if ICF).

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ If No, the 8-step process must

be initiated.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

NOTE: Six steps of the 8-step process identified in

24 CFR Part 50.4 must be completed, if an application

is recommended for funding.

\(3\) The Form HUD-92013-E has been reviewed and is

acceptable.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-10

(Technical Processing - Valuation) - continued

Project No.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(4\) For applications with site control only, the proposed

project meets Environmental Assessment requirements,

including Compliance Findings (including SHPO

comments and HUD\'s historic finding) set forth in

attached Form HUD-4128 or 4128.1, as appropriate.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ N/A \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

If No, the application shall NOT be rejected. It

shall receive 0 points for Criterion 2 (b) and (c)

and be placed into Category B, provided it meets all

other requirements and scores at least 50 points.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(5\) Is the site located in a floodway, Coastal High

Hazard Area, and/or within a designated Coastal

Barrier (Coastal Barrier Resources Act P.L. 97-348)?

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

If Yes, the site must be rejected. The application

shall receive 0 points for Criterion 2 (b) and (c).

If an application with evidence of site control, it

shall also be placed in Category B.

\(6\) If the proposed site is an RTC property, was the

Transaction Screen Checklist or Phase I Environmental

Site Assessment Submitted?

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(7\) The proposed construction or rehabilitation is or

will be permissible under applicable zoning

ordinances or regulations.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-11

(Technical Processing - Valuation) - continued

Project No.
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

In summary, the subject application is: Acceptable

Not

Acceptable

Explain:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Signature or Appraiser) Date

Attachment: Form HUD-4128 or 4128.1, as appropriate, with

supporting documentation.

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 18, AND 19 WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE

THE ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-12

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

\- ECONOMIC & MARKET ANALYSIS

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
Director, Economic &

Market Analysis

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application has been reviewed and EMAS\'s

findings are as follows:

1\. Taking into consideration the economic and demographic

characteristics of persons with disabilities in the

housing market area and the current and anticipated market

conditions in assisted housing for persons with

disabilities, is there sufficient demand for the number

and type of units proposed?

Yes No If No, site must be rejected.

NOTE: EMAS must notify MHR that any points VAL gave the

application for suitability of the site must be deleted.

In the case of an application with evidence of site

control, the application will be placed in Category B

provided it meets all requirements and scores at least 50

points.

Explain basis for the finding:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2\. The proposed location is acceptable and desirable for the

proposed population and the project is not likely to have

an adverse effect on public, HUD-insured and assisted

housing.

Yes No

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-13

(Technical Processing - EMAS) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

NOTE: EMAS should complete the above question only if it has

available relevant information on the site and location.

RATING FACTOR

2\. In determining the need for supportive housing for

persons with disabilities in the area to be served, the

extent to which the Sponsor has site control, and the

suitability of the site, consider:

\(a\) The extent of the need for the project in the area

based on a determination by the Field Office. This

determination will be made by taking into

consideration the Sponsor\'s evidence of need in the

area based on the guidelines in 24 CFR

890.265(b)(18), as well as other economic,

demographic and housing market data available to the

Field Office. The data could include the

availability of existing Federally assisted housing

(HUD and FmHA) for persons with disabilities and

current occupancy in such facilities, Federally

assisted housing for persons with disabilities under

construction or for which fund reservations have been

issued and, in accordance with an agreement between

HUD and FmHA, comments from the FmHA on the demand

for additional assisted housing and the possible harm

to existing projects in the same housing market area

(8 points maximum).

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Unmet Needs Ratio: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-14

(Technical Processing - EMAS) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Based on the EMAS review, the application is:

Acceptable Not Acceptable

Explain:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Signature of Economist) Date

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 17, 18, AND 19 WERE REVIEWED TO

DETERMINE THE ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-15

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

-FAIR HOUSING & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (FHEO)

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
Director, Fair Housing and

Equal Opportunity

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The Office of Fair Housing and Equal opportunity (FHEO)

has reviewed the subject application in accordance with the

rating criteria as outlined in this Handbook and applicable

notices and in accordance with applicable civil rights

requirements. FHEO\'s recommended ratings and comments on the

acceptability of the application are as follows:

1\. Based on the application submission, even without the

benefit of a site visit, the proposed site meets site and

neighborhood standards.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

If No, without proper justification, site is rejected and

application receives no points for Criterion 2 (b) and

(c). In addition, if an application with site control, it

is placed in Category B.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2\. Sponsor is in compliance with civil rights laws and

regulations, i.e., there is no pending Department of

Justice civil rights suit, or outstanding finding of

non-compliance with civil rights statutes, executive orders,

or regulations (as a result of formal administrative

proceedings), or Secretarial charge under the Fair Housing

Act which has not been resolved; and, there has not been a

deferral of the processing of applications from the

Sponsor.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-16

(Technical Processing - FHEO) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

3\. The Sponsor\'s Certifications are acceptable in connection

with compliance with civil rights laws, regulation,

Executive Orders, and equal opportunity requirements.

(NOTE: FHEO shall accept the Certifications unless

there is documented evidence to the contrary.)

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

NOTE: Any application that would require rejection based on a

\"No\" response in any of the above questions (with the exception

of question #1) must be rated. However, the application will

not be ranked. The applicant will not be notified of the

rejection until technical processing has been completed.

RATING FACTORS

1\. In determining the Sponsor\'s capacity to develop and

operate the proposed housing on a long-term basis,

consider: (8 points maximum)

\(b\) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor\'s

experience in providing housing or related services

to minority persons or families (5 points maximum).

NOTE: If the Sponsor has no previous housing

experience, all relevant supportive services

experience should be examined.

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(c\) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor\'s

experience in providing opportunities for minority

and women-owned business enterprises participation

(3 points maximum).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-17

(Technical Processing - FHEO) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2\. In determining the need for supportive housing for persons

with disabilities in the area to be served, the extent to

which the Sponsor has site control, and the suitability of

the site, consider: (7 points maximum).

\(c\) Suitability of the site from the standpoint of

promoting a greater choice of housing opportunities

for minority disabled persons. (7 points maximum)

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The following additional findings have been made:

\(1\) The project addresses a low participation rate and an

identified need for housing for very low income

minority disabled persons.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(2\) Based upon data submitted in Exhibit 10, the Sponsor

indicates ties to the minority community.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(3\) The Sponsor\'s project is consistent with the

affirmatively furthering fair housing provisions of

the jurisdiction\'s CHAS certification.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-18

(Technical Processing - FHEO) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(4\) For projects with relocation indicated, is the

information submitted in Exhibit 8 acceptable?

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Not Applicable \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(5\) The Sponsor submitted the required racial and ethnic

data on the persons/businesses to be displaced.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Not Applicable \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application is acceptable from a FHEO

viewpoint.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Explain:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Signature of FHEO Reviewer) Date

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, AND 18 WERE REVIEWED TO

DETERMINE THE ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-19

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

\- MANAGEMENT

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
Director, Housing

Management Division

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The Housing Management Division has reviewed the subject

application according to outstanding instructions and the

findings are as follows:

RATING FACTORS:

1\. In determining the Sponsor\'s ability to develop and operate

the proposed housing on a long-term basis, consider:

\(a\) The scope, extent and quality of the Sponsor\'s

experience in providing housing or related services

to the persons proposed to be served by the project

and the scope of the proposed project (i.e., number

of units, services, relocation costs, development,

and operation) in relationship to the Sponsor\'s

demonstrated development and management capacity.

(32 points maximum).

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

NOTE: In arriving at recommended ratings,

consideration must be given to evidence

provided by the Sponsor that it has

organizational continuity and will be able

to continue its support to the project for

at least 40 years.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-20

(Technical Processing - HM) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

3\. In determining adequacy of the provision of supportive

services and of the proposed facility, consider:

(20 points maximum)

\(a\) The extent to which the Sponsor has demonstrated that

the identified supportive services will be provided

on a consistent long-term basis - strength of

commitments to fund or provide the supportive

services or indications of the availability of

necessary supportive services to project residents.

(10 points maximum)

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(b\) The quality of the services implementation plan. (10

points maximum)

Recommended rating: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The following additional findings have been made:

\(1\) Housing Management\'s experience with the Sponsor has

been satisfactory, if self-management or identity of

interest management is proposed.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Not Applicable \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-21

(Technical Processing - HM) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\(2\) Is project likely to affect adversely other

HUD-insured and assisted housing?

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ If yes, application must be

rejected.

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application is acceptable from a Housing

Management viewpoint.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Explain:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Signature of HM Reviewer Date

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 10, 11, 12, 15, 19 WERE REVIEWED TO

DETERMINE THE ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-22

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

FIELD OFFICE COUNSEL

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
Field Office Counsel

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application has been reviewed and the Field

Office Counsel\'s comments are as follows:

1\. The Sponsor is an eligible nonprofit entity, no part of the

net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private

party and which is not controlled by or under the

direction of persons seeking to derive profit or gain

therefrom.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2\. The Sponsor has the necessary legal authority to sponsor

the project, to assist the Owner and to apply for the

capital advance.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-23

(Technical Processing - Counsel) - continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

3\. The Sponsor has an IRS tax exemption 501(c)(3) ruling, a

blanket exemption with the Sponsor specifically named in

the list, or a copy of the letter from the national/parent

organization to the IRS requesting that the Sponsor be

included under its blanket exemption.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

4\. The Sponsor has submitted documentary evidence of site

control which does not contain restrictive covenants or

reverter clauses unacceptable to HUD.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ N/A \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

5\. The Sponsor\'s board has adopted a resolution which:

\(a\) Certifies that no officer or board member of the

Sponsor, or of the Owner when formed, has or will be

permitted to have any financial interest in any

contract or in any firm or corporation that has a

contract with the Owner in connection with the

construction or operation of the project, procurement

of the site or other matters whatsoever. (NOTE:

This prohibition, as to the Sponsor\'s officers or

board, does not apply to any management or supportive

service contract entered into by the Owner with the

Sponsor or its nonprofit affiliate.)

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-24

(Technical Processing - Counsel) - continued

Project No.

\(b\) Lists all the Sponsor\'s duly qualified and sitting

officers and directors, their titles, and the

beginning and ending date for each of their term of

office.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Comments:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

NOTE: If the answer to any item is checked \"No,\" with the

exception of Question #4, Counsel will check \"not acceptable\"

below and the application will be rejected.

RECOMMENDATION:

The subject Application is acceptable.

The subject Application must be rejected for the

following reason(s):

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Signature of Field Office Counsel) Date

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 2, 14, AND 18 WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE

ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-25

SECTION 811

TECHNICAL PROCESSING REVIEW AND FINDINGS MEMORANDUM

COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD)

RELOCATION REVIEW

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Housing Development Division

FROM: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_,
Director, Community

Planning and Development

SUBJECT: Technical Processing Review and Findings Memorandum

Sponsor Name:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project Location:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Project No.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Proj. Type/# of Struct.: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \# of Units per Struct.:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

The subject application has been reviewed with regard to

displacement and acquisition and finds the following:

1\. (a) Sponsor has completed the information required

by Exhibit 8, Data on Project Occupancy,

Displacement and Real Property Acquisition.

Yes No

\(b\) Sponsor has identified persons occupying the

property on the date of submission of the

Application (or initial site control, if

later).

No. not to be No. to be

Displaced Displaced

Households (families

and individuals) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Business and Nonprofit

Organizations \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Farms \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Totals \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2B-26

(Technical Processing - CPD) continued

Project No. \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2\. (a) Estimated costs for relocation and real property

acquisition, if applicable, are reasonable.

Yes No

\(b\) The source of funding for such costs has been

identified.

Yes No

\(c\) There is a firm commitment to provide funds for

relocation costs (Section 811 funds or other

sources).

Yes No

3\. Organization to administer relocation has been

identified.

Yes No

4\. Certification of compliance with Relocation and real

property acquisition requirements has been provided.

Yes No

In view of the above, the proposal is acceptable to

Community Planning and Development.

Yes \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ No \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ If no, identify the conditions

for acceptability.

Conditions, if any, for approval:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

(Signature of CPD Reviewer) Date

NOTE: EXHIBITS 1, 8, AND 18 WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE

ABOVE FINDINGS.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2C-1

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FUNDING NOTIFICATION AND WORKSHOPS

The Regional Office will send a copy of the NOFA, Funding

Notification and information (use notification format on

page 2 of this attachment) regarding the date, time and

place of the workshop to the following:

\- All persons and organizations on the Office\'s mailing

list;

\- Elderly and minority media;

\- Other organizations involved in housing and community

development within the Office\'s jurisdiction;

\- Groups with a special interest in housing for the

disabled;

\- Chief executive officers of appropriate units of

State/local government in all instances where there

is a Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy

(CHAS).

In addition, the following must be notified, where

feasible:

\- Trade association journals;

\- Associations representing the disabled;

\- State agencies, such as departments of human

resources.

\- Fair housing groups (the names and addresses of

such organizations and groups shall be provided to

the PC&R staff by the Equal Opportunity Division

Directors).

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

ATTACHMENT 2C-2

FUNDING NOTIFICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR \_\_\_\_\_\_\_

SECTION 811 SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

CAPITAL ADVANCE PROGRAM

The Department of Housing and Urban Development will accept

applications from nonprofit organizations for rental or

cooperative housing under the Section 811 Capital Advance

Program for Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities

subject to the following:

Units Capital Advance

Section 811 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

This represents the funding available for Region \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

Applicants must not request more units than advertised and must

not exceed the program limits for housing for persons with

disabilities.

Appropriate filing information is contained in an Application

Package which may be obtained from
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(Field Office
Address)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

This office will conduct a workshop on
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(date)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ at

(tine)\_\_\_\_\_\_ for interested applicants to explain the Section 811

program, to distribute Application Packages and to discuss

application procedures. The facility for the workshop is

accessible to individuals with disabilities. The VOICE/TDD

telephone number is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

APPLICATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED BY (TIME) AND (DATE). IF MAILED,

APPLICATIONS MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE FIELD OFFICE NO LATER THAN

THE FOREGOING DEADLINE. APPLICATIONS RECEIVED AFTER THE TIME

AND DATE SPECIFIED WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.