JE

TO: Distribution

FROM: JE/Acting Director, Environmental Management Division

SUBJECT: Installation Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation Plans and
Progress Assessments

The purpose of this letter is to request submission of *Installation
Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation Plans and Progress Assessments
(Installation Plans)* for FY 1996. *Installation Plans* combine the
requirements for an annual Installation energy report required by the
NASA interim policy letter on energy efficiency and water conservation
issued by Code J on December 14, 1995, and an annual self assessment of
the energy management function required by NMI 1240.3B, *Functional
Management*. The enclosure provides guidance for preparing FY 1996
*Installation Plans*. Minor changes have been made to this year's
guidance to include reporting of energy efficiency metrics for Mission
Variable and Industrial facilities.

As in the past, *Installation Plans* prepared by NASA Centers should
include relevant information for the Center's component installations.
If approved by the Center energy manager, component installations may
prepare and submit their own separate *Installation Plans*. It should
also be noted that the requirement to complete the self assessment
portion of the *Installation Plan* does not apply to the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, nor to off-site facilities such as the Goldstone Deep Space
Network Complex and the SN/STDN.

Please submit your FY 1996 *Installation Plan* to Code JE with a copy to
your respective institutional program office no later than October 28,
1996. Questions regarding this request should be directed to Rich
Wickman at (202) 358-1113.

Olga M. Dominguez

Enclosure

2

[Distribution]{.underline}:

ARC/200-9/J. Coleman

19-04-09/S. Frankel

DFRC/D-1036/S. Hodsdon

K. Kloesel

GSFC/220/J. Hodge

221/B. Green

534.3/D. Rosage

JPL/200-200/B. Fischer

200-203/V. Nasoordeen

144-201/L. Huertas

303-403/E. Thom

JSC/JA/J. Hickmon

JJ3/D. Klekar

KSC/IM/M. Jones

IM-F/E. Lebron

LaRC/112/K. Hessenius

481/R. Graham

LeRC/3-6/J. Yuska

501-8/J. Davis

M. Makinen

MSFC/AB01/B. McCullar

AB37/C. Davis

SSC/GA-00/F. Kailiwai-Barnett

GA-10/W. Parks

cc:

MI/S. Malone

OT/W. Lundy

RT/S. Yee

SP/D. Pinkler

YM/D. Norton

MAF/SA-39/F. Celino

3141/F. Rosiere

NMO-JPL/180-802/K. Lindstrom

PBS/1605/R. Kozar

WFF/228/D. Lilly

WSTF/RC/J. Villegas

DNY/AD-94/R. Patel

SSFL/T486/R. Hanna

bcc:

JE/C. Campos

C. Goff

JE:R. Wickman:C:\\WP51\\ECMIP\\FY1996\\FY96_FIN.DOC:8/13/96

August 13, 1996

GUIDANCE FOR PREPARING INSTALLATION

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND WATER CONSERVATION

PLANS AND PROGRESS ASSESSMENTS

**Requirements**

*Installation Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation Plans and
Progress Assessments* (hereafter referred to as \"*Installation
Plans*\") are intended to satisfy all of the following reporting
requirements with a single document:

1\. [Agency Energy Conservation and Management Implementation Plan
(ECMIP)]{.underline} - The National Energy Conservation Policy Act
(NECPA) requires each agency to prepare and maintain a plan describing
how the agency intends to meet NECPA requirements. The NASA interim
policy letter on energy efficiency and water conservation issued by Code
J on December 14, 1995, requires Directors of NASA Field Installations
to prepare and annually update their own *Installation Plans* (formerly
called 15-Year Energy Conservation Plans) to provide the basis for the
Agency ECMIP.

2\. [Agency Report to the Secretary of Energy]{.underline} - NECPA
requires each agency to transmit an annual report to the Secretary of
Energy by December 1 each year with complete information on its
activities in meeting Federal energy management goals. Updated
*Installation Plans* provide the basis for the annual Agency Report.

3\. [Agencywide Integrated Program Assessment for Energy]{.underline} -
NMI 1240.3B, *Functional Management*, requires Installation Functional
Managers to conduct periodic energy self-assessments and report results
to the Installation Director. Summary results must also be reported to
the Agency Functional Manager (Acting Director, Environmental Management
Division, Headquarters Code JE).

**Format for FY 1996 *Installation Plans***

*Installation Plans* should address significant actions taken during FY
1996 and actions planned through FY 2005 to meet the requirements of
NECPA and Executive Order 12902. FY 1996 *Installation Plans* should
address the following items in brief narrative statements, tables and
charts, as appropriate:

1\. *Energy Reduction Goal for Non-Mission Variable (NMV) Buildings.*

Review progress and discuss planned actions to meet the 20 percent BTU
per gross square foot reduction goal for FY 2000 and the 30 percent
reduction goal for FY 2005. Reduction in BTU per gross square foot is
measured from the FY 1985 baseline. Fill out metric 1.0 in Appendix G.

2\. *Energy Efficiency Goal for Mission Variable (MV) Facilities.*

Review progress and discuss plans to increase the energy efficiency of
MV facilities by 10 percent by FY 2000 relative to FY 1985. Fill out all
applicable metrics in section 2.0 of Appendix G following the procedures
established in the Code J interim policy letter on energy efficiency and
water conservation dated December 14, 1995 (Attachment 1).

3\. *Energy Efficiency Goal for Industrial Facilities*.

Each Installation with Industrial facilities shall report on its
activities to develop and implement a program to increase energy
efficiency by at least 20 percent by FY 2005 as compared to the FY 1990
baseline, to the extent these measures are cost-effective, and to
implement all cost-effective water conservation projects. Industrial
facilities are defined as facilities which use large amounts of capital
equipment for the production or rehabilitation of goods. Fill out all
applicable metrics in section 3.0 of Appendix G using the procedure for
applying energy metrics for MV and Industrial facilities contained in
Attachment 1.

4\. *Minimization of Petroleum Use in Federal Buildings and Facilities.*

Report on activities and plans to reduce the use of petroleum in
buildings and facilities by switching to less-polluting,
nonpetroleum-based energy sources, such as natural gas or solar and
other renewable energy sources. Fill out metric 4.0 in Appendix G.

5\. *Energy and Water Surveys and Audits*.

a\. Comprehensive Facility Audits for NMV - Outline the 10-year plan
that has been developed for conducting comprehensive audits for NMV
facilities. Discuss how audit priorities were determined. Indicate the
percentage of NMV square footage for which audits have been completed.
Fill out metric 5.1 in Appendix G.

b\. Exempt Facilities - Executive Order 12902 requires Agencies to
eliminate energy and water waste wherever possible in exempt facilities.
Explain what actions are underway or planned to meet this requirement.
At a minimum, a walk-through audit of each MV facility should be
conducted. A walk-through audit is defined as a visual inspection of a
facility to determine energy and water conservation opportunities.
Walk-through audits may result in simple, prescriptive projects, such as
lighting retrofits, and should validate the need, if any, for a more
detailed audit to investigate more complex projects, where they appear
to be cost-effective. Note that Installations may conduct more detailed
comprehensive facility audits in lieu of walk-through audits whereever
they are considered necessary and cost-effective. Indicate the
percentage of MV square footage for which audits have been completed.
Fill out metric 5.2 in Appendix G.

c*.* Leased Facilities. Indicate percentage of building square footage
which is leased. Explain procedure for completing energy and water
audits and projects in those buildings.

*6. Implementation of Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation
Projects.*

Installations Plans shall list energy efficiency and water conservation
projects (including both CoF and installation funded projects) with
payback periods of less than 10 years that were completed in FY1996 or
are planned for future years. Identify funding obligated during FY 1996
and planned expenditures for FY 1997. To the extent that information is
available, provide project title, and estimated annual dollar and BTU or
water savings.

\(I\) Implementation of Existing Audits - List projects that are
currently underway or completed as a result of audits performed between
FY 1991 - FY 1995.

\(II\) Implementation of New Audit Recommendations - List projects that
are currently underway or completed as a result of audits performed
during FY 1996.

\(III\) Fill out metrics 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 in Appendix G.

7\. *Solar and other Renewable Energy*.

The information required for Agency external reporting of renewable
energy accomplishments and plans will be taken from Center input to the
Agency Renewable Energy Technologies Implementation Plan (RETIP), which
is required to be submitted to Code JE by October 28, 1996, under
separate action.

8\. *Procurement of Energy Efficient Goods and Products.*

Describe activities and plans to institute mechanisms, set targets, and
measure progress of efforts to purchase energy-efficient products
whenever they meet the Installation\'s specific performance requirements
and are cost-effective.

9\. *New Space*.

Describe efforts to ensure that the design and construction of
facilities minimize life cycle costs by utilizing energy efficiency,
water conservation, or solar or other renewable energy technologies.
List projects completed in FY 1996 or planned for future years in which
cost-effective passive solar design and active solar technologies are
utilized. Identify the facilities involved and the technologies
utilized.

*.*

10\. *Performance Evaluations.*

Describe efforts to include successful implementation of energy
efficiency, water conservation, and solar and other renewable energy
projects in position descriptions and performance evaluations of
facility managers, designers, energy managers, their superiors, and
others critical to the implementation of Executive Order 12902.

11\. *Incentive Awards*

Describe any employee incentive programs that have been established to
appropriately reward exceptional performance in implementing the
provisions of NECPA and Executive Order 12902.

12\. *Procurement and Use of Alternative Fueled Vehicles (AFVs).*

Provide the following information on procurement of AFVs and usage of
alternative transportation fuel (if applicable):

a\. The total number of AFVs purchased by the Installation in FY 1996 by
AFV type. Include fuel type (i.e. compressed natural gas, ethanol,
methanol, etc.) and vehicle configuration (i.e. dedicated, bi-fuel,
dual-fuel, or flexible-fuel). The following definitions apply:

*Dedicated* - uses only one type of alternative fuel and no conventional
fuel

*Bi-Fuel* - contains two separate fuel systems, but designed to use only
one fuel at a time

*Dual-Fuel* - contains two separate fuel systems designed to be used
simultaneously

*Flexible-Fuel* - designed to run on blends of gasoline and ethanol or
methanol

b\. The total number of AFVs owned by the Installation or leased from
GSA. Include fuel type and vehicle configuration.

c\. The amount and cost of each of the following alternative fuel
consumed in AFVs during FY 1996:

[Alternative Fuel]{.underline} [Reporting Units]{.underline} [Annual
Cost]{.underline}

Biodiesel Gallons Dollars

Electric Kilowatt-hours \"

Ethanol (95 or 100%) Gallons \"

E-85 (85% ethanol) Gallons \"

Hydrogen Hundred cubic feet \"

Methanol (95 or 100%) Gallons \"

M-85 (85% methanol) Gallons \"

Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) Gallons \"

Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) Gallons @ 14.7 psi and -264^o^ F \"

Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Hundred cubic feet or \"

Gallons@ 2,400 psi and 70^o^ F

d\. Fill out metrics 7.1 and 7.2 in Appendix G.

**Appendices**

*Installation Plans* should provide the following additional information
as appendices.

[Appendix A.]{.underline} Building Square Footage.

Provide a copy of GSA Form 1166 for FY 1996. If the final GSA Form 1166
for FY 1996 is not available time to meet the submission deadline for
*Installation Plans*, provide a copy of the most recent GSA Form 1166 of
record. For energy reporting purposes, total gross square footage for
Buildings reported in Section III of the GSA Form 1166, minus the gross
square footage of the Building portions of MV facilities identified in
Appendix B, will be used by Code JE in the calculation of center and
overall Agency progress toward the BTU per gross square foot energy
reduction for NMV buildings. Square footage associated with Other
Structures is not included in the calculation of Building Square Footage
for energy reporting purposes.

[Appendix B.]{.underline} Mission Variable (MV) and Industrial Facility
Listings.

Describe efforts to review MV facility designations for conformance with
NASA definitions for MV and Industrial facilities (Attachment 1). This
review is intended to ensure that only individual buildings in which
energy-intensive or industrial operations are conducted remain
designated as either \"exempt\" or \"industrial\" per Executive Order
12902. Provide a separate listing of MV and Industrial facilities,
including facility numbers, titles and gross square footage, if any,
grouped by the metric reporting category defined in Attachment 1. Note
any redesignations from the FY 1995 MV facilities list. Provide written
justification for any facilities that have been added to the list in FY
1996. All facility redesignations will be reported by NASA to the
Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).

[Appendix C.]{.underline} Energy Savings Performance (ESP) Contracts.

Provide the following information for each ESP contract awarded in FY
1996 or planned for award in FY 1997:

1\) Installation management structure responsible for implementing a
program to enter into ESP contracts; include the number of ESP contracts
currently in placed along with the contract name, scope, and date of
award.

2\) The estimated annual energy savings (in millions of BTUs) and cost
savings (in dollars) that will be realized.

3\) Total share of estimated cost savings that the contractor will
receive as payment over the life of the contract.

4\) Total share of estimated cost savings the Government will retain
over the life of the contract.

5\) The procedures used by the installation to verify anticipated and
actual energy costs savings along with the actual or anticipated use of
energy cost savings resulting from the contract.

6\) A description of the procedures used to verify actual or anticipated
energy and cost savings associated with the ESP contract.

7\) Any problems or difficulties encountered in entering into the ESP
contract.

8\) Recommended solutions to difficulties encountered in entering into
ESP contracts.

[Appendix D.]{.underline} Training.

Each installation shall report on the status of efforts to establish and
maintain a program to ensure that facility energy managers are trained
energy managers as required by Section 157 of EPACT. Include
expenditures for energy management training and the number of personnel
trained in FY 1996.

[Appendix E.]{.underline} Environmental Benefits of Energy Management
(Optional).

Installations are encouraged to submit a voluntary report on the
environmental impacts of their energy management activities. Pertinent
subject areas may include, but are not limited to, the reduction of CFCs
in HVAC systems, reduction of greenhouse gases resulting from
conservation activities, and procedures for safely disposing obsolete
fluorescent ballasts.

[Appendix F]{.underline}. Self-Assessment Summary.

Each Installation shall provide a self-assessment summary for the energy
management function using the format specified.

[Appendix G]{.underline}. Energy Management Performance Indicators.

Each Installation shall provide performance indicators (metrics) for
energy management using the format specified.

**FORMAT FOR APPENDIX F**

**ENERGY MANAGEMENT SELF-ASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT**

[Introduction]{.underline}:

NMI 1240.3B (Functional Management) includes the requirement for the
Headquarters functional manager to provide to the Administrator an
integrated program assessment report. In order for Code JE to meet this
requirement relative to energy management, summary self-assessment
reports must be prepared by each NASA Installation and appended to the
*Installation Plan*. The summary reports, in conjunction with the energy
metrics of Appendix G, will include narrative identification of any
major weakness or deficiencies noted in the *Installation Plan*, and the
plan and schedule to correct them. Furthermore, any energy management
process improvements which could have application at other Installations
will be described. Any areas requiring NASA Headquarters assistance or
action will be identified.

[Summary Reports of Self-Assessment Results]{.underline}:

1\. Overall assessment rating: While each Installation is to explain the
rational for such assessment ratings, the following general guidelines
should be applied as appropriate:

Excellent: All major and most minor assessment items are satisfactory.
There are no significant corrective actions required.

Satisfactory: Most major assessment items are satisfactory, and all
required significant corrective actions can be accomplished by the next
assessment.

Marginal: Either: a significant number of major assessment items are
unsatisfactory, but all required corrective actions can be accomplished
by the next assessment; or, most major assessment items are
satisfactory, but all significant corrective actions will not be
accomplished by the next assessment.

Unsatisfactory: A significant number of major assessment items are
unsatisfactory, and all significant corrective actions will not be
accomplished by the next assessment.

2\. Identification of significant lessons learned, process improvements
(completed, underway, planned), and success stories that could be
beneficial to share among other Installations.

3\. Identification of any significant weaknesses/deficiencies.

4\. Significant corrective actions taken.

5\. Significant corrective actions to be taken (include milestones)

6\. Identification of any areas requiring assistance or action by NASA
Headquarters.

7\. An overall indication of the level of vulnerability of the energy
management function as measured against the following standard:

Low Existing controls are sufficient to minimize risks regardless of how
much risk is inherent in a process.

Medium There are several areas of significant risk in spite of existing
controls, but the remaining risk is unlikely to result in (1) loss of
life, (2) significant loss or waste of resources, or (3) endangerment
of, or could result in, reduction of the Agency\'s ability to perform
it\'s mission.

High There are several areas of significant risk in spite of existing
controls, and the remaining risk has the potential to result in (1) loss
of life, (2) significant loss or waste of resources, or (3) endangerment
of, or could result in, reduction of the Agency\'s ability to perform
it\'s mission.

[Note]{.underline}: Consider the Management Controls Criteria for Energy
Management contained in Attachment 2 as the basis for assessing the
vulnerability of the energy management function.

**FORMAT FOR APPENDIX G**

**ENERGY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (METRICS)**

1.0 [Non-Mission Variable (NMV) Building Energy Reduction]{.underline}:
Calculate overall changes in BTUs per gross square foot for NMV
buildings in FY 1995 and FY 1996 compared with the FY 1985 baseline.

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [BTU per Gross Square Foot]{.underline} [from
Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1985 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GSF

FY 1995 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GSF \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GSF \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

2.0 [Mission Variable (MV) Facility Energy Efficiency
Improvement]{.underline}: Calculate overall change in MV facility energy
efficiency in FY 1996 compared with the FY 1985 baseline. Use each of
the following metrics developed by the EMWG that apply. Provide all
detail for how the metrics were derived. Identify the specific
facilities that are included in the category and their associated gross
square footage.

2.1 Operational, Test, and Support Facilities:

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [BTU per Gross Square Foot]{.underline} [from
Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1985 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GSF

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GSF \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

2.2 Wind Tunnels/Model Development:

Megawatt Hours per Standard Test

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [Megawatt Hours per Standard Test]{.underline}
[from Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1985 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ MWH/Std Test

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ MWH/Std Test \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

2.3 Cleanroom Facilities:

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [BTU per Gross Cubic Foot]{.underline} [from
Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1985 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GCF

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU/GCF \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

2.4 Goldstone Deep Space Communications Complex:

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [Tracking Hours per Megawatt Hour]{.underline}
[from Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1985 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Tracking Hours/MWH

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Tracking Hours/MWH
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

3.0 [Industrial Facility Energy Efficiency Improvement]{.underline}:
Calculate change in INDUSTRIALfacility energy efficiency in FY 1996
compared with the FY 1990 baseline. . Use each of the following metrics
developed by the EMWG that apply. Provide all detail for how the metrics
were derived. List the specific facilities that are included in the
category and their associated gross square footage.

3.1 Utility Distribution Facilities:

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [BTU Input/BTU Output (Percent)]{.underline}
[from Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1990 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU In/BTU Out (%)

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU In/BTU Out (%)
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

3.2 Manufacturing Facilities:

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [BTU Input/Units Produced/Degree
Days]{.underline} [from Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1990 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU In/# Units/DD

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU In/# Units/DD
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

3.3 Refurbishment & Coating Facilities:

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [BTU Input/Units Processed/Degree
Days]{.underline} [from Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1990 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU In/# Units/DD

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ BTU In/# Units/DD
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

4.0 [Facilities Petroleum Usage Reduction]{.underline}: Determine the
level of petroleum (fuel oil and propane) consumption in FY 1995 and FY
1996 compared with FY 1985 in millions of BTUs (MMBTUs).

Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [Petroleum BTUs Consumed]{.underline} [from
Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1985 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ MMBTUs

FY 1995 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ MMBTUs \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ MMBTUs \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

5.0 [Energy and Water Surveys and Audits]{.underline}:

5.1 [Non-Exempt (NMV) Facilities]{.underline}: Since FY 1991, for what
percentage of facility gross square footage have energy and water audits
been completed: %

(Include both walk-through audits for facilities under 10,000 gross
square feet and comprehensive audits for facilities over 10,000 gross
square feet.)

5.2 [Exempt (MV) Facilities]{.underline}: Since FY 1991, for what
percentage of facility gross square footage have at least walk-through
audits been completed: %

6.0 [Implementation of Energy Efficiency and Water Conservation
Projects]{.underline}:

6.1 [Project Implementation]{.underline}: What percentage of 10 year
payback energy and water conservation measures identified since FY 1991
are underway or completed (based on total annual cost saving potential):
%

6.2 [Direct Expenditures]{.underline}: Show direct expenditures (\$K)
for facility energy efficiency and water conservation improvements made
in FY 1996 and planned for FY 1997. Identify annual energy and cost
savings anticipated from FY 1996 and FY 1997 expenditures.

Expenditures Annual Savings

[\$K]{.underline} [\$K]{.underline} [MMBTU]{.underline}

FY 1996:

FY 1997:

6.3 [Utility Rebates]{.underline}:

1\) Rebates received in FY 1996: \$K

2\) Funds spent in order to receive rebates: \$K

3\) Annual energy and cost savings anticipated from projects that
qualified for rebates: MMBTU and \$K

7.0 [Transportation Energy/Alternative Fuel Vehicles
(AFVs)]{.underline}:

7.1 [AFVs]{.underline}: Compare planned versus actual AFV acquisitions
or leases since

FY 1994.

Number of Number of Number of

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [AFVs Planned]{.underline} [AFVs
Acquired]{.underline} [AFVs Leased]{.underline}

FY 1994 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FY 1995 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

7.2 [Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Reduction]{.underline}: Calculate the
percent change in gasoline and diesel fuel consumption for vehicles in
FY 1996 compared with the FY 1991 baseline.

Gasoline Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [Usage (MMBTU)]{.underline} [from
Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1991 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_MMBTUs

FY 1995 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_MMBTUs \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_MMBTUs \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

Diesel Fuel Percent Change

[Fiscal Year]{.underline} [Usage (MMBTU)]{.underline} [from
Baseline]{.underline}

FY 1991 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_MMBTUs

FY 1995 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_MMBTUs \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

FY 1996 \_\_\_\_\_\_\_MMBTUs \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ %

[Note:]{.underline}

\$K = Thousands of Dollars

KGAL = Thousands of Gallons

MMBTU = Millions of BTUs

**ATTACHMENT 1**

**INTERIM NASA POLICY FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY**

**AND WATER CONSERVATION**

**DATED DECEMBER 14, 1995**

**ATTACHMENT 2**

**MANAGEMENT CONTROLS CRITERIA FOR**

**ENERGY MANAGEMENT**

I. [CRITERIA]{.underline}

The following General Accounting Office criteria should be considered in
assessing the vulnerability of the energy management function.

A. [Organization]{.underline}

Is the energy management organizational structure clearly defined to
permit the performance of necessary functions and the establishment of
appropriate reporting relationships?

Is there a key individual assigned to serve as the focal point for all
energy matters and to manage and monitor energy consumption and
conservation?

Are personnel adequately trained to perform the energy management
functions for which they are responsible (or is there a working plan to
do so)?

Is there clear delegation and communication of authority within the
energy management organization?

Are energy management policies and procedures disseminated to personnel
and affected organizational components?

Is there an adequate system of internal auditing, inspections, and/or
testing?

Is there a system of identifying and reporting, and correcting
management control weaknesses?

B. [Data Integrity and Documentation]{.underline}

Are there controls in place to ensure the integrity, accuracy, and
currentness of energy data?

Are energy usage records, utility bills, transportation fuel bills, and
mission/non-mission variable baseline data up-to-date and accurate?

Are all energy management systems, functions and processes clearly
documented?

Is documentation readily available for examination?

**ATTACHMENT 2 (Continued)**

C. [Authorization]{.underline}

Are appropriate controls in place to ensure that transactions and other
significant activities are authorized and executed only by persons
acting within the scope of their authority?

Do employees adhere to the requirements of authorization only by persons
acting within the scope of their authority?

D. [Separation of Duties]{.underline}

Are key duties and responsibilities such as authorizing, processing,
recording, reviewing, and certifying work separated among individuals?