**SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST**

(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Commonwealth of Virginia

Date Submitted: October 2, 2006

Subject:

Completeness Review

Completed by: Ellen Wentworth

Date Completed: November 3, 2006

**Administrative Materials**

**ACCEPTABLE**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  **EPA REQUIREMENT**               **STATE SUBMITTAL**               **(X)**
  --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ---------
  1\. A formal letter of submittal  1\. Letter dated October 2, 2006  x
  from the Governor or his          from David K. Paylor, Director,   
  designee, requesting EPA approval Virginia Department of            
  of the plan or revision thereof.  Environmental Quality to Judith   
                                    M. Katz, Air Protection Division, 
                                    Region III.                       

  2\. Evidence that the State has   2\. Revision was adopted by the   x
  adopted the plan in the State     State Air Pollution Control Board 
  code or body of regulations; or   on June 21, 2006, in accordance   
  issued the permit, order, consent with the requirements of section  
  agreement in final form. That     10.1-1308 of the Virginia Air     
  evidence shall include the date   Pollution Control Law, and 40 CFR 
  of adoption or final issuance as  part 51. Effective date of the    
  well as the effective date of the revision is October 4, 2006.      
  plan, if different from the                                         
  adoption/issuance date.                                             

  3\. Evidence that the State has   3\. Revision adopted pursuant to  x
  the necessary legal authority     section 10.1-1308 of the Virginia 
  under State law to adopt and      Air Pollution Control Law.        
  implement the plan.                                                 

  4\. A copy of actual regulation,  4\. Commonwealth of Virginia,     x
  or document submitted for         Department of Environmental       
  approval and incorporation by     Quality, 9 VAC 5-40-300,          
  reference into the plan,          Standards for Volatile Organic    
  including indication of the       Compounds, Article 36,            
  changes made to the existing      Flexographic, Packaging           
  approved plan, where applicable.  Rotogravure and Publication       
  The submittal shall be a copy of  Rotogravure Printing Lines,       
  the official State                Article 37, Petroleum Liquid      
  regulation/document signed,       Storage and Transfer Operations,  
  stamped, dated by the appropriate Article 53, Lithographic Printing 
  State official indicating that it Processes, adopted on June 21,    
  is fully enforceable by the       2006, published in the            
  State. The effective date of the  [Virginia]{.underline}            
  regulation/document shall,        [Register]{.underline} on         
  whenever possible, be indicated   September 4, 2006, effective      
  in the document itself.           October 4, 2006.                  

  5\. Evidence that the State       5\. A letter dated October 2,     x
  followed all of the procedural    2006, from David K.Paylor,        
  requirements of the State\'s laws Director, Virginia Department of  
  and constitution in conducting    Environmental Quality to Judith   
  and completing the                M. Katz, Air Protection Division, 
  adoption/issuance of the plan.    EPA Region III. Certification of  
                                    Public Participation Activities.  
                                    Copy of public hearing notice run 
                                    in the [Richmond                  
                                    Times-Dispatch]{.underline} on    
                                    November 28, 2005                 

  6\. Evidence that public notice   6\. Copy of hearing notice run in x
  was given of the proposed change  the November 28, 2005 [Richmond   
  consistent with procedures        Times-Dispatch]{.underline}       
  approved by EPA, including the    indicating public hearing would   
  date of publication of such       be held on January 12, 2006       
  notice.                                                             

  7\. Certification that public     7\. Public hearing held on        x
  hearings were held in accordance  January 12, 2006; Certification   
  with the information provided in  of Public Participation           
  the public notice and the         Activities found in Enclosure 2   
  State\'s laws and constitution,   to the letter dated October 2,    
  if applicable.                    2006 from David K. Paylor,        
                                    Director, Virginia Department of  
                                    Environmental Quality to Judith   
                                    M. Katz, Air Protection Division, 
                                    EPA Region III.                   

  8\. Compilation of public         8\. Record of Hearing and Summary x
  comments and the State\'s         of Testimony found in Enclosure 3 
  response thereto.                 to the letter dated October 2,    
                                    2006 from David K. Paylor,        
                                    Director, Virginia Department of  
                                    Environmental Quality to Judith   
                                    M. Katz, Air Protection Division, 
                                    Region III.                       

  1\. Identification of all         1\. The plan regulates VOC and    x
  regulated pollutants affected by  NOx emissions.                    
  the plan.                                                           

  2\. Identification of the         2\. Fredericksburg, Richmond, and x
  locations of affected sources     Hampton Roads, VA Emissions       
  including the EPA                 Control Areas.                    
  attainment/nonattainment                                            
  designation of the locations and                                    
  the status of the attainment plan                                   
  for the affected area(s).                                           

  3\. Quantification of the changes 3\. N/A                           x
  in plan allowable emissions from                                    
  the affected sources; estimates                                     
  of changes in current actual                                        
  emissions from affected sources                                     
  or, where appropriate,                                              
  quantification of changes in                                        
  actual emissions from affected                                      
  sources through calculations of                                     
  the differences between certain                                     
  baseline levels and allowable                                       
  emissions anticipated as a result                                   
  of the revision.                                                    

  4\. The State\'s demonstration    4\. This submittal revises        x
  that the national ambient air     Chapter 40, Article 4, 36, 37,    
  quality standards, prevention of  and 53, in order to manage the    
  significant deterioration         extension of applicability of     
  increments, reasonable further    these provisions to the           
  progress demonstration, and       additional VOC and NOx emission   
  visibility, as applicable, are    control areas with coherence and  
  protected if the plan is approved consistency.                      
  and implemented.                                                    

  5\. Modeling information required 5\. N/A                           x
  to support the proposed revision,                                   
  including input data, output                                        
  data, models used, ambient                                          
  monitoring data used,                                               
  meteorological data used,                                           
  justification for use of offsite                                    
  data (where used), modes of                                         
  models used, assumptions, and                                       
  other information relevant to the                                   
  determination of adequacy of the                                    
  modeling analysis.                                                  

  6\. Evidence, where necessary,    6 Refer to the rulemaking         x
  that emission limitations are     actions/docket for the Federal    
  based on continuous emission      and State regulations cited.      
  reduction technology.                                               

  7\. Evidence that the plan        7\. Refer to the rulemaking       x
  contains emission limitations,    actions/docket for the Federal    
  work practice standards and       and State regulations cited.      
  recordkeeping/reporting                                             
  requirements, where necessary, to                                   
  ensure emission levels.                                             

  8\. Compliance/enforcement        8\. N/A                           x
  strategies, including how                                           
  compliance will be determined in                                    
  practice.                                                           

  9\. Special economic and          9\. N/A                           x
  technological justifications                                        
  required by any applicable EPA                                      
  policies. (If a policy is not                                       
  appropriate, explain why.)                                          

  10\. A Section 107 request must   10\. N/A                          X
  be accompanied by a maintenance                                     
  plan demonstrating maintenance to                                   
  the relevant NAAQS for at least                                     
  10 years after redesignation.                                       
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------