+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | *   | **C |
| millions)**             | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | *FY | ost |
|                         | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 200 | t   |
|                         | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 9** | o** |
|                         | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |     |     |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |     | **C |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |     | omp |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |     | let |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |     | e** |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+
| Project BB -- Small     | 0  | 2  | .4 | .6 | .7 | .7 | .7  | C   |
| Business Innovative     | \* | .1 |    |    |    |    |     | ont |
| Research                |    |    |    |    |    |    |     | inu |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |     | ing |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+-----+

\*In year of execution, funding executed under PE 0605502BR "Small
Business Innovative Research"

-   This project:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Stimulates technological innovation in the private sector

-   Strengthens the role of small business in meeting DoD research and
    development needs

-   Fosters and encourages participation of minority and disadvantaged
    businesses in technological innovation

-   Increases the commercial application of DoD supported research and
    development results.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   These efforts are responsive to PL 106-554.

**B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) 0\*       2.1       .4
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

########  FY 2003 Accomplishments

-   Supported the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research. In year of execution, funding executed under PE 0605502BR
    "Small Business Innovative Research"

    **FY 2004 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Support the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research.

    **FY 2005 Plans**

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Support the Small Business Administration (SBA) National Direction
    by actively seeking small business contractors to perform innovative
    research.

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** N/A

+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | **C |
| millions)**             | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | ost |
|                         | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | t   |
|                         | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | o** |
|                         | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |     |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | **C |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | omp |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | let |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | e** |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| Project BI -- Arms      | 42 | 5  | 6  | 5  | 18 | 21 | 21 | C   |
| Control Technology\*    | .0 | .4 | .8 | .9 | .6 | .3 | .7 | ont |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | inu |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | ing |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+

**\***Project retitled to \"Detection Technology\" in FY 2005 to better
define the program

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

-   This project provides an integrated and comprehensive approach to
    meet technology requirements associated with achieving national
    defense nonproliferation and arms control objectives. Major
    activities include:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Develop technologies to monitor, detect, identify and locate
    strategic, conventional and improvised weapons, or their components,
    to support DoD requirements in the areas of international treaties
    and agreements, homeland security, combating terrorism and
    nonproliferation.

-   Develop procedures and equipment that will enable the United States
    government to effectively exercise treaty inspection rights, monitor
    compliance, and accomplish reporting associated with current and
    projected treaty requirements in the most non-intrusive and
    cost-effective manner. Objectives include achieving more effective
    methods of measuring characteristic Treaty-Accountable Item
    signatures (e.g. for non-deployed missiles and warheads in all
    life-cycle phases, to include conversion and/or elimination) and
    providing monitoring/inspection capabilities to reduce the overall
    cost and increase the flexibility of U.S. inspectors utilizing
    technologies based on physical principles such as nuclear radiation
    detection, acoustics, or chemical identification.

-   Develop technology to provide information collection, processing and
    dissemination capabilities for compliance assessments and to meet
    notification and reporting requirements associated with evolving
    treaties and agreements (e.g., new rules for counting strategic
    forces).

-   Develop technologies to synergistically support international
    peacekeeping efforts and other nonproliferation initiatives.

-   Perform technology assessments and provide technical input to
    support development of innovative agreements addressing arms control
    issues in new topical areas and/or specific geographical regions.

-   Provide improved detection systems to DoD to detect radiological or
    high explosive material. Improvement in systems includes increased
    range of detection, lower costs, lower weight and better resolution
    and sensitivity to minimize false positives.

-   Develop systems using advances in solid state nuclear detectors,
    processing electronics, analysis software, and identification
    technology, and combination nuclear/biological/chemical sensor
    technology.

**B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in thousands)**                **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  Arms Control Technology\*                 42.0      5.4       6.8
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

##### \* Retitled to \"Detection Technology\" in FY 2005 to better define the program 

##### FY 2003 Accomplishments

-   Continued cooperative development of strategic arms control
    technologies with the Russian Federation

-   Continued development of portable high resolution room temperature
    gamma ray detectors.

-   Continued development of highly efficient portable neutron
    detectors.

-   Continued Open Skies sensor performance evaluations and accomplished
    RDT&E to support application of sensor equipment for Open Skies
    aircraft.

-   Continued Open Skies Management and Planning System (OSMAPS) life
    cycle upgrade assessment.

-   Initiated Data Preparation Facility (DPF) enhancements to meet Open
    Skies operations requirements.

-   Transferred research and development programs to the U.S. Air Force
    and U.S. Army that improved understanding of source phenomenology
    and propagation for nuclear events near detection threshold and
    enhanced detection, location, screening, and identification of
    underground, oceanic, and atmospheric events.

-   Completed development and delivery of the Integrated Notification
    Application, replacing the Open Skies Notification Front End System
    (NOFES), Conventional Armed Forces in Europe NOFES and Confidence
    and Security Building Measures Macros to the Organization for
    Security and Cooperation in Europe.

-   Developed prototype to demonstrate data synchronization of legacy
    data using a virtual database schema in preparation for the
    Inspection Planning Module development and selection of alternative
    technical approaches.

-   Awarded contract and began development of the Inspection Planning
    Module to manage inspector and transport crew personnel information
    and to conduct situational analysis.

-   Completed development and delivery of the Treaty Limited Equipment
    search tool under the Compliance Monitoring and Tracking System
    (CMTS) for HQ EUCOM, HQ USAFE, HQ USAREUR and DTRA OS.

-   Completed Windows 2000 operating system upgrade to the Compliance
    Monitoring and Tracking System.

-   Completed hardware upgrade to the Compliance Monitoring and Tracking
    System and USAF START Reporting System as part of a life cycle
    replacement.

-   Initiated reciprocal COOP agreement and alternate/hot backup
    capability with HQ ACC at Langley AFB.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continued development of the next generation conventional treaties
    application suite to integrate and provide consistency in reporting
    across conventional treaties and agreements.

-   Initiated development of the Treaty Limited Equipment Area Search,
    advanced catalog search tool and notifications in a web environment.

-   Added HQ Central Command and Marine Forces Europe in support of data
    management responsibilities under Vienna Document 99 Confidence and
    Security Building Measures.

**FY 2004 Plans**

-   Continue cooperative development of technologies with the Russian
    Federation to enhance security and accountability of Russian nuclear
    weapons.

-   Continue development of portable high-resolution room temperature
    gamma ray detectors.

-   Continue development of highly efficient portable neutron detectors
    for the detection of radiological or nuclear weapons.

-   Continue Open Skies sensor performance evaluations and accomplished
    RDT&E to support application of sensor equipment for Open Skies
    aircraft for the detection of radiological or nuclear weapons.

-   Continue development of the Treaty Limited Equipment Area Search
    advanced catalog search tool (Initial Operational Capability (IOC)
    -- 1st QTR FY04), and notifications (2nd QTR FY04) in a web
    environment.

-   Develop CMTS Adapted Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty
    interface to Integrated Notification Application

-   Provide a data management capability for Conventional Forces Europe
    (CFE) to support treaty entry into force planning assumptions.

-   Continue state-of-the-art technologies development of next
    generation treaty support information management capabilities under
    the Arms Control Information and Notification (ACIN) Program.

-   Continue development of enhanced web-based training and situational
    analysis tools.

-   Complete development and delivery of the Inspection Planning Module.

-   Continue Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) tests of
    information processing systems.

-   Continue program for developing systems using advances in solid
    state nuclear detectors, processing electronics, analysis software,
    identification technology, and combination
    nuclear/biological/chemical sensor technology.

######### FY 2005 Plans

-   Continue Open Skies sensor performance evaluations and accomplished
    RDT&E to support application of sensor equipment for Open Skies
    aircraft.

-   Continue state-of-the-art technologies development of next
    generation treaty support information management capabilities under
    the Arms Control Information and Notification (ACIN) Program.

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** N/A

+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | **C |
| millions)**             | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | ost |
|                         | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | t   |
|                         | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | o** |
|                         | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |     |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | **C |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | omp |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | let |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | e** |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| Project BJ -- SOF       | 25 | 47 | 18 | 21 | 17 | 19 | 20 | C   |
| Counterproliferation    | .1 | .3 | .8 | .1 | .6 | .7 | .1 | ont |
| Support                 |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | inu |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | ing |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

-   This project supports the Joint Functional Concept of Force
    Application by developing and demonstrating technologies that enable
    Special Operations Forces (SOF) to detect, disable, neutralize and
    render safe WMD and their associated facilities. Weapons of Mass
    Destruction (WMD) and their associated facilities are proliferating
    among potential U.S. adversaries. This mission within Force
    Applications has been identified as a critical national priority and
    assigned to SOF since 1995. The goals of the SOF Project are to
    provide management oversight and technical assistance for SOF-unique
    technologies, and develops enhanced SOF applications that expand the
    technology base to mitigate near and mid-term program deficiencies.

-   The following programs are currently planned: SOF
    Counterproliferation (CP) Research and Development (R&D),
    Manportable, and the Sensor/Detector Development and Testing
    Program. These three programs are described in the following
    paragraphs:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The SOF CP R&D Program demonstrates through combat validations
    SOF-unique devices that enable SOF to detect, disable and neutralize
    WMD and their associated facilities. This project directly supports
    SOF contributions to the nation\'s effort to counter the spread of
    WMD. Efforts in this project include: the defeat of hard and deeply
    buried targets (HDBT), explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) and
    maritime efforts to prevent the spread of WMD technology. Details of
    this program have been classified per CJCSM 5225-01 dated 23 Oct
    1996.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Manportable program develops a full spectrum of complimentary
    Combating Terrorism (CT) and Counterproliferation (CP) capabilities
    that will provide the Department of Defense, Combatant Commanders
    (COCOM) and Other Government Agencies (OGA) the ability to detect
    and destroy WMD in various backgrounds, concentrations and forms.
    This program will also develop an analysis of the current knowledge
    base for detection and decontamination of Chemical, Biological,
    Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) materials. DTRA will provide, upon
    request, direct program support to develop enhanced capabilities for
    USSOCOM applications that expand this technology base and mitigate
    mid-term deficiencies. Details of this program have been classified
    per CJCSM 5225-01 dated 23 Oct 1996.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Sensor/Detector Development and Testing Program has two distinct
    objectives: develop portable, high resolution and highly efficient
    room temperature radiation detectors; and develop an integrated
    sensor network to improve the tactical operating picture for SOF. To
    accomplish these objectives the program is broken up into two
    separate activities, the Guardian Portable Radiation Search Program
    and the Sensor Network Integrated Technology Demonstration. These
    two activities are described in the following paragraphs:

-   The Guardian Portable Radiation Search Program develops portable,
    high resolution, and highly efficient room temperature radiation
    detectors. The goal of this program is to improve detection and
    characterization of nuclear threats via increased sensitivity,
    selectivity, and specificity of radiation measurements conducted in
    a field environment.

-   

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Sensor Network Integrated Technology Demonstration project
    demonstrates the capability of mature/maturing technologies
    networked together to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of
    SOF to clandestinely conduct Intelligence, Surveillance and
    Reconnaissance (ISR) in denied littoral and other areas to support
    Combating Terrorism/Counterproliferation missions and Theater
    CONPLANs/OPLANs. This effort leverages legacy DTRA programs to guide
    development of an integrated sensor network to improve the tactical
    operating picture for SOF.

B.  **Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  SOF Counterproliferation Support          17.9      18.3      18.8
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

########  FY 2003 Accomplishments

-   Specific details are classified.

**FY 2004 Plans**

-   Specific details are classified.

##### FY 2005 Plans

-   Specific details are classified.

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  Manportable                               7.2       5.0       0
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

FY 2003 Accomplishments

-   Initiated gap analysis of the current knowledge base for chemical
    agent defeat.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Isolated the gene, cloned and purified an active enzymatic
    preparation for an agent defeat capability.

-   Conducted an independent biological decontaminant efficacy test for
    various formulation candidates.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Delivered draft report detailing formulation performance.

**FY 2004 Plans**

-   Deliver final chemical agent defeat gap analysis.

-   Validate enzymatic-based agent defeat chemistries.

-   Complete a gap analysis of the current knowledge base for biological
    agent defeat.

-   Develop a manportable biological agent defeat capability using
    polymers.

-   

-   Develop, validate and deliver a sample processing capability that
    will allow identification of agents using "gold standard"
    techniques.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Develop technologies to address gaps identified in gap analysis.

-   Execute transition of developed capabilities to USSOCOM.

-   Seek collaborative manportable efforts with DTRA partners.

-   Conduct market surveys for new investment opportunities.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  The Sensor/Detector Development and       0         24.0      0
  Testing Program                                               
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

########  FY 2004 Plans

-   The following are the FY 2004 plans for the Guardian Portable
    Radiation Search Program

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Advance technologies for verification and compliance monitoring

-   Develop man-portable instruments with minimal battery power needs

-   Develop vehicle-mobile instruments with long-range gamma and neutron
    detection capabilities

-   Develop and test integrated prototypes

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The following are the FY 2004 plans for the Sensor Network
    Integrated Technology Demonstration

-   Identify the applicable systems/technology that exist or are in
    development that relate to current requirements

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete individual systems/technology development as required

-   Demonstrate their respective individual capability

-   Develop the technology to integrate the individual systems

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

-   

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   
-   

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   

-   Demonstrate a fully integrated network

C.  **Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

D.  **Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E: Major Performers:** Approximately \$13M of FY 2003 funding was
obligated with USSOCOM located in Florida in support of the Special
Operations Forces (SOF) Counterproliferation Support.

+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | **C |
| millions)**             | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | ost |
|                         | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | t   |
|                         | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | o** |
|                         | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |     |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | **C |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | omp |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | let |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | e** |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| Project BK --           | 57 | 42 | 48 | 63 | 72 | 73 | 75 | C   |
| Counterforce            | .0 | .0 | .4 | .9 | .9 | .2 | .7 | ont |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | inu |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | ing |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

-   Project BK supports the Joint Functional Concept, Force Application,
    and the Quadrennial Defense Review transformational Goal to Deny
    Enemy Sanctuary. The objective is to develop technologies,
    demonstrate prototype systems in an operationally realistic
    environment, support operators in defining innovative concepts of
    operation, and provide combatant commanders with enhanced
    capabilities that respond to potential adversaries' capability to
    develop and/or employ nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons
    of mass destruction (WMD). The U.S. requires the capability to
    attack and neutralize NBC research, production, storage, operations
    and support, and command and control facilities while mitigating
    collateral effects from expulsion and release of NBC agents.
    Potential targets include fixed, above ground and underground,
    hardened and unhardened facilities, as well as related Command,
    Control, Communications and Intelligence (C3I) facilities, and
    transshipment and delivery systems. The goal is rapid development
    and demonstration of enhanced counterforce mission capabilities that
    include, but are not limited to, advanced conventional and
    non-conventional (non-nuclear) weapons, application of sensor
    technologies for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) combat assessment
    and target-attack planning tools that optimize weapon and sensor
    employment.

-   This project emphasizes technology demonstrations to include
    Advanced Technology Demonstrations (ATD) and Advanced Concept
    Technology Demonstrations (ACTD). The following are current programs
    in the Counterforce Project: the Second Counterproliferation (CP2)
    Counterforce ACTD; Agent Defeat, Deny and Disrupt (AD3); Biological
    Combat Assessment System (BCAS) ATD; SOF Warrior renamed SOF Venture
    for FY04 and beyond; SOF Bio ACTD; SOF Chem ATD; the Hard Target
    Defeat (HTD) demonstrations; WMD Time-Sensitive Target Defeat and
    Counterforce Taggant Technology (restructured in FY04 from Standoff
    High-Speed Option for Counterproliferation that did not get JROC
    approval as an ACTD); WMD Planning Capability; and the CP Analysis
    and Planning System (CAPS). Additional funds for this Project, added
    as a result of the Secretary of Defense Strategic Review in FY 2002,
    are being used to demonstrate technologies identified in the Hard
    and Deeply Buried Target Defeat (HDBTD) Science & Technology Master
    Plan. These Counterforce programs are grouped by the supported
    mission area: WMD Counterforce Applications; SOF
    Counterproliferation Support; Hard Target Defeat; and the
    Counterproliferation Analysis and Planning System. They are
    described in the following paragraphs:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   WMD Counterforce Applications:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The objective of the CP2 ACTD is to develop, demonstrate, and
    deliver enhanced standoff, counterforce capabilities in conjunction
    with operational concepts to combatant commanders for attack
    planning and timely, reliable defeat of WMD related facilities while
    minimizing collateral hazards. The CP2 ACTD depends on technology
    base and products in PE 0602716BR, Project BD for planning tools and
    Project BE for test planning and execution support for the WMD
    Defeat Operational Demonstrations. The Navy and Air Force are both
    participating in weapons and WMD combat assessment system
    development for the ACTD. The CP2 ACTD has been approved by Deputy
    Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Systems and Concepts DUSD
    (AS&C), and the management plan was signed April 21, 1999. USEUCOM
    is the operational sponsor with USJFCOM and USSTRATCOM
    participating. The CP2 ACTD started in FY 1999 and will be completed
    in FY 2004. Residual support for several CP2 ACTD products will
    continue through FY 2005. Accomplishments for the CP2 ACTD can be
    found under the WMD Combat Assessment, Collateral Effects Prediction
    & Target Response, Weapons and Operational Demonstrations
    subprojects.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Agent Defeat, Deny, Disrupt (AD3) program is a joint effort with
    the U.S. Air Force. The objectives are to develop, demonstrate and
    transition an enhanced capability to either defeat, deny access to
    WMD material and systems, or disrupt the adversary\'s capability to
    employ those materials or systems; and to obtain collateral effects
    test data to enhance target planning tools. The program started in
    FY 2002. This program responds to the 1994 U.S. Air Force Mission
    Need Statement for Agent Defeat Weapons. This program includes
    development, demonstration, and enhancement of weapons specifically
    designed for AD3 missions, including \'Shredder\' and Crash Prompt
    Agent Defeat (PAD). AD3 depends on the technology base PE 0602716BR,
    Project BD for weapons phenomenology.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Biological Combat Assessment System (BCAS) ATD leverages the
    development work completed and demonstrated for the Chemical Combat
    Assessment System in FY 2003. BCAS is a new start in FY 2004 and
    will demonstrate a biological assessment capability that supports CP
    counterforce missions. USPACOM is the operational sponsor. BCAS
    supports PACOM's Biological Weapons Countermeasures Initiative.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The WMD Time-Sensitive Target Defeat and Counterforce Taggant
    Technology programs examine weapons effects of attacks on
    time-sensitive targets (TST) and the ability to enhance WMD combat
    assessment through weapon-borne taggants. Test data collected during
    simulated TST attack testing will be used to develop models for WMD
    planning capability tools. The Counterforce Taggant Technology
    program will conduct sub-scale and full-scale tests of promising
    taggants technologies to help in the location and tracking of
    biological agent simulants in explosive plumes. This subproject
    started as Standoff High-Speed Option for Counterproliferation ACTD
    planning in FY 2003 and continues as restructured in FY 2004.

-   WMD Planning Capability develops and demonstrates planning tools to
    support combatant commanders during exercises and actual operations.
    The effort continues collateral effects and target response tool
    development from prior years to address new applications.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Special Operation Forces (SOF) Counterproliferation (CP) Support:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   SOF Venture (previously named SOF Warrior) develops specialized SOF
    technologies and equipment prototypes to detect, disable and render
    safe and recover critical components from WMD devices in
    non-permissive and time-sensitive environments. This effort began in
    FY 2003.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The SOF Bio ACTD was transferred from Project BJ in FY 2003 to
    demonstrate enhanced capabilities for the customer, USSOCOM. SOF Bio
    ACTD integrates existing and developing technologies to produce
    SOF-focused capabilities for counterproliferation operations against
    biological warfare production, storage, and weaponization
    facilities. The objective is to provide to the Geographic Combatant
    Commander/USSOCOM capabilities, adaptable to other areas of
    responsibilities (AORs), for counterproliferation activities in
    response to a country's BW program. The ACTD acts as a forcing
    function across DoD to develop Joint Doctrine, focusing on SOF
    capabilities, for counterproliferation of biological warfare
    infrastructure not vulnerable to attack by conventional forces.
    Scheduled for June 2003, the final demonstration was delayed one
    year due to real-world operational requirements. Details of this
    program are classified per CJCSM 5225-01, dated 23 Oct 1996.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The SOF Chem ATD integrates existing and developing technologies to
    produce SOF-focused capabilities for counterproliferation operations
    against chemical warfare production, storage, and weaponization
    facilities. The objective is to provide capabilities to the
    Geographic Combatant Commander and USSOCOM capabilities for
    counterproliferation activities in response to a country's CW
    program. These capabilities will be adaptable to other areas of
    responsibility (AORs). The ATD acts as a forcing function across DoD
    to develop Joint Doctrine, focusing on SOF capabilities, for
    counterproliferation of chemical warfare infrastructure not
    vulnerable to attack by conventional forces. Details of this program
    are classified per CJCSM 5225-01, dated 23 Oct 1996.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Hard Target Defeat (HTD):

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The HTD program objective is to develop and demonstrate end-to-end
    capabilities for the functional defeat of hard targets, particularly
    tunnels, and assess developing weapon and sensor concepts against
    such targets. The program does not develop new sensors; it assesses
    existing or emerging technologies being developed by others. The HTD
    program develops technologies under PE 0602716BR, Project BF, and
    transitions them to this program for demonstration. The
    demonstrations require test planning and execution support from PE
    0602716BR, Project BE. HTD customers are USPACOM, USSTRATCOM,
    USSOCOM, and the Air Force's Air Combat Command.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Hard Target Defeat (HTD) demonstrations develop new weapons,
    delivery concepts, and planning capabilities to defeat Hard and
    Deeply Buried Targets. The following demonstrations are part of the
    current plan:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The C3I Defeat Demonstration explores and demonstrates a range of
    novel concepts for defeat of underground C3I facilities. The
    currently planned HTD C3I Demonstration ends in FY 2004. Transition
    to the Combatant Commands of promising concepts is anticipated this
    fiscal year.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Tunnel Defeat ACTD will improve the warfighter's confidence in
    selecting the smallest nuclear yield necessary to destroy
    underground facilities while minimizing collateral damage. The focus
    of the demonstration is to reduce the uncertainties in target
    characterization and weapon effect/target response. Target
    characterization uncertainties include those related to determining
    the target function, layout, operational status, and the geological
    and geotechnical features. Weapons effects/tunnel response
    uncertainties are associated with predicting ground shock and tunnel
    response in layered and jointed media.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Thermobaric ACTD will develop a weapon concept that is based on
    a new class of thermobarics. Thermobarics include a broad range of
    high-energy density materials that are capable of producing high
    temperatures (\"thermo\") and high pressures ("barics") for extended
    periods of time creating the potential for producing sustained,
    distributed airblast in hard targets. The weapon could be used
    against certain types of tunnel targets for a maximum functional
    kill of the tunnels. Prototype weapons will be tested under
    operational conditions for their performance, and leave-behinds will
    be delivered to the customer.

-   The Intelligent Munition for the Precision Attack on Critical
    Targets (IMPACT) Proof of Concept Demonstration will develop a
    system, using existing technology, which can be fielded quickly, is
    affordable and that can defeat ground combat vehicles that take
    sanctuary in tunnel complexes. The vehicles include multiple rocket
    launch systems (MRLS) and theater ballistic missile systems (TBM)
    that attack while outside the tunnel. These vehicles reduce their
    vulnerability by retreating into tunnels once launch operations have
    concluded. This Proof of Concept Demonstration will demonstrate a
    means to provide a quick response to kill theses target while they
    are most vulnerable during launch operations.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Counterproliferation Analysis and Planning System (CAPS) program
    responds to the need for a comprehensive and timely
    counterproliferation (CP) target planning tool to assist combatant
    commanders in the conduct of their Concept of Operations Plan
    (CONPLAN) 0400 targeting responsibilities. Products from CAPS
    include end-to-end descriptions of country specific Nuclear,
    Biological, Chemical, and Missile (NBC/M) programs of proliferation
    concern. The analysis provides combatant commanders highly detailed
    assessments of a country\'s NBC/M programs, and proliferation
    pathways, and identifies the critical nodes and key facilities that,
    if eliminated, would cause the greatest impact to that program. This
    information will directly support the combatant commanders in the
    planning and execution of their CP missions. These analyses are
    conducted in successive levels of detail, identified as Level 1-5
    analyses, with Level 1 having the lowest analytical detail and Level
    5 the highest. As an output of the analyses, CAPS will provide CP
    target planners with the critical data elements needed to take
    effective action against the NBC/M programs of proliferating
    countries, and will also predict whether there will be environmental
    consequences (hazards) produced by these actions. CAPS transfers to
    USSOCOM in FY2004. The planned programs provide products in five
    areas: WMD combat assessment, collateral effects prediction, target
    response, weapons and operational demonstrations. These product
    areas are described in the following paragraphs:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   [**WMD Combat Assessment.**]{.underline} This product area has
    evolved from the former (completed in FY 1998) Counterproliferation
    1 (CP1) ACTD sensor product area to provide WMD combat assessment
    capabilities. Product area efforts will provide improved warfighting
    capabilities against the spectrum of WMD-related facilities. These
    efforts will continue to leverage existing programs to (1) evaluate
    near-term technologies; (2) define concepts of operation and system
    architecture for chemical combat assessment; (3) produce data fusion
    and mission planning modules to meet user requirements on existing
    platforms; and (4) integrate chemical and biological combat
    assessment capabilities onto delivery systems, such as unmanned air
    vehicle (UAV) and expendable mini-UAV platforms. This effort will
    further demonstrate the ability to confirm, identify and assess the
    release of biological/chemical agents in support of attacks on NBC
    facilities and assist in predicting transport patterns by updating
    pre-strike predictions of the potentially hazardous plume with
    real-time data.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The combat assessment product area will not develop its own sensors,
    but will leverage ongoing chemical sensor efforts within the
    chemical and biological defense community to minimize program risk
    for applying this technology to counterforce missions. In CP2, a
    Chemical Combat Assessment System (CCAS) was demonstrated. The
    feasibility of a Biological Combat Assessment System (BCAS) is being
    studied in FY 2004. BCAS is an airborne Biological Battle Damage
    Assessment capability that provides near real-time analysis to
    determine if a biological agent has been released following a
    counterforce attack on adversary biological production and storage
    facilities. The BCAS system is intended to transition to an ATD
    program in FY 2004 under a phased program approach: Spiral 1 (FY
    2004-2006) -- cloud standoff detection with point biological sample
    collection; Spiral 2 (FY 2006-2007) -- cloud standoff detection with
    point biological sample collection and identification.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **[Collateral Effects Prediction]{.underline}.** The collateral
    effects effort provides predictive tools for a variety of
    applications supporting Nuclear, Biological and Chemical (NBC)
    target attack planning to include NBC expulsion and dispersion
    resulting from attacks on WMD facilities as well as acts of
    terrorism and hostile use of WMD. Requirements include
    high-resolution weather models, weather measurement systems, and
    population databases. A key element in developing these collateral
    effects codes is chemical/biological expulsion tests and modeling.
    Modeling of chemical/biological expulsion sources will be based on
    theoretical models and empirical data. Codes will be validated from
    existing data, other predictive models and special collateral
    effects experiments. The collateral effects tools will provide
    pre-attack prediction and post-attack assessment.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) is a major
    product that predicts the release and transport of NBC materials and
    the subsequent collateral effects. The high-resolution weather
    prediction capability, another area of emphasis in the product area,
    will provide timely wind, cloud, and precipitation data necessary
    for more detailed NBC collateral effects predictions. These tools
    will also be integrated into the target attack planning tools to
    assess the consequences of attacks on WMD facilities.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **[Target Response]{.underline}.** This effort will provide a new
    target attack planning and combat assessment capability and a major
    upgrade for existing theater-level planning capabilities for
    defeating or denying NBC facilities and capabilities. This effort
    builds on the Integrated Munitions Effects Assessment (IMEA)
    planning tool developed for CP1 ACTD. IMEA provides a forward
    deployable, target planning capability for NBC targets. IMEA is an
    integration of the Munitions Effects Assessment (MEA) tool providing
    targeting solutions using conventional weapons for a variety of
    structures and equipment and the HPAC developed under the Collateral
    Effects Prediction product area. The integrated capability supports
    the warfighters in the attack planning phase with target response
    and collateral effects prediction, and in the post-attack phase with
    combat assessment and re-strike decision support. Upgrades to IMEA
    for the CP2 ACTD include additional target types (including complex
    facilities), additional weapons as developed in the Weapons area
    below (including multiple weapon effects), additional platforms,
    more operator-friendly displays, more WMD material types, weather
    interfaces and sources, and more detailed weapon input parameters
    (such as angle of attack). The ultimate CP2 IMEA product was able to
    run stand-alone or in a web-based client-server distributed
    architecture. It is migrating into the Integrated Target Planning
    Tool Set (ITPTS). ITPTS is evolving into the Integrated WMD Toolset
    (IWMDT). IWMDT is the second CP2 deliverable. The IWMDT will provide
    a spectrum of planning and assessment capabilities from deliberate
    to crisis. IWMDT provides the warfighter a standardized weaponeering
    framework that greatly increases weaponeering efficiency and
    fidelity while minimizing warfighter training requirements. It
    expedites cross service/coalition weaponeering and joint planning.
    The IWMDT architecture provides the warfighter with cross platform
    interoperability and a common look and feel, independent of weapon
    or target. In addition, it provides the warfighter critical decision
    support services for all target classes including those associated
    with weapons of mass destruction. IWMDT will also predict weapons
    performance and associated NBC collateral effects, develop targeting
    solutions that minimize collateral effects, and provide results
    through appropriate interfaces for a variety of targets including
    functionally and structurally complex facilities. IWMDT will provide
    an enhanced seamless interface to the Intelligence Community (IC)
    data sources. IWMDT will be the weaponeering segment in the Joint
    Targeting Toolbox (JTT) and provides the warfighter with targeting
    information in JTT\'s \"Electronic Target Folder\" (ETF). This
    effort will execute a full verification and validation program, in
    accordance with the Joint Technical Coordinating Group for Munitions
    Effects (JTCG/ME) Procedures, for all delivered capabilities
    including extensive verification testing and operational and field
    testing at all functional levels.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **[Weapons]{.underline}.** This product area will develop, integrate
    and demonstrate advanced conventional weapons technologies to
    improve mission effectiveness against NBC targets while mitigating
    collateral effects. The focus for CP2 ACTD was to provide combatant
    commanders with a demonstrated option to attack NBC facilities in a
    standoff mode. This effort improved on existing standoff weapon
    platforms to provide enhanced penetration and advanced fuzing
    developed during CP1. Standoff weapons that were enhanced include
    the Tactical Tomahawk in a penetrator variant and the Conventional
    Air Launched Cruise Missile (CALCM). An enhanced payloads project
    explores alternate warhead options to conventional
    blast/fragmentation with the objective of mitigating collateral
    effects associated with dispersal of NBC. Hard Target Defeat (HTD)
    will demonstrate the use of non-conventional (non-nuclear) weapons
    to functionally defeat tunnels. HTD weapons technology being
    developed includes advanced energetics (like thermobarics) and
    non-energetics for functional defeat of hard and deeply buried
    targets.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **[Operational Demonstrations]{.underline}.** This product area will
    improve the operational capability for holding NBC targets at risk
    with minimum collateral effects. The objective is to integrate
    available or near-term technologies for WMD combat assessment,
    weapons, collateral effects prediction and target-planning tools, to
    evaluate the technologies in an operational context, and to
    transition improved capabilities rapidly to combatant commands.
    Specifically, this product area will enhance and accelerate existing
    programs to provide integrated target planning, collateral effects
    prediction codes, a Biological Combat Assessment System (BCAS) and
    advanced weapons to meet NBC target defeat requirements. This
    product area will also support demonstration operations to include
    system operational concept, demonstration planning, scenario
    development, execution of the demonstration, and post-demonstration
    analysis. Planning and execution of demonstrations use a time phased
    approach to screen candidate technologies for maturity, develop
    prototype systems and demonstrate enhancements in military
    capability against a combatant command prioritized subset of all
    potential NBC target types. This approach results in a cycle of
    prototype development and testing followed by periods of operational
    demonstration.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Three operational demonstration series were conducted for CP2 ACTD
    over the period of FY 2000-2003 to provide the operational sponsor,
    United States European Command, and participating commands with the
    opportunity to assess the utility of the selected technologies. The
    objective of the first demonstration series in CP2 ACTD, called
    Dipole Yukon (DY), was to demonstrate the capability to plan and
    execute chemical/biological (C/B) counterforce missions with the
    Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) through operationally
    realistic attacks against a simulated biological weapons storage
    facility. The objective of the second demonstration, called Dipole
    Zodiac (DZ), was to assess the suitability of the CALCM with a
    penetrating warhead and a Predator unmanned air vehicle (UAV) based
    standoff collateral effects assessment system. The objective of the
    third demonstration series, called Divine Canberra (DC), was to
    evaluate the end-to-end set of products of the CP2 ACTD including
    the target planning tool, in its final operational context, the
    Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator Variant (TTPV), and remote combat
    assessment using a small expendable mini-UAV with a chemical point
    detector on-board (and deployed from the Predator UAV demonstrated
    in DZ) against a hard chemical production and storage facility.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The following operational demonstrations are planned for FY04-06:

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The BCAS ATD starts Spiral 1 in FY2004 and ends Spiral 2 in FY2007.
    The operational sponsor is USPACOM.

-   The SOF Bio ACTD was delayed in completing by one year due to
    operational sponsor wartime commitment. It now completes
    demonstration in FY2004.

-   The SOF Chem ATD, a three-year effort, starts in FY04.

-   A Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence (C3I) facility
    defeat demonstration will be completed and assessed in early FY04.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   The Thermobaric ACTD will leverage existing concepts and work in
    energetic payload technology to weaponize, demonstrate, and deliver
    an improved weapon system for the functional defeat of tunnels
    targets. Three operational demonstrations are planned in FY 2005
    against an operationally representative underground facility
    complex. The demonstrations will lead to a military utility
    evaluation conducted by the operational sponsors, United States
    Pacific Command and United States Forces Korea. The evaluation will
    assess the end-to-end ability of an improved weapon system to
    functionally defeat an underground facility complex.

-   The Tunnel Target Defeat ACTD began in FY2003 and will continue into
    FY2004. The operational sponsor is USSTRATCOM.

-   The IMPACT Proof of Concept Demonstration starts in FY2004. It will
    demonstrate technologies to defeat time-sensitive mobile WMD targets
    secured in tunnels.

B.  **Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  WMD Counterforce Applications             31.4      17.0      26.5
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

########  FY 2003 Accomplishments

-   Completed flight-testing of integrated FINDER mini-unmanned air
    vehicle (UAV) on Predator.

-   Exercised Chemical Combat Assessment System (CCAS) Predator standoff
    system and mini-UAV point detector during the Divine Canberra
    operational demonstration.

-   Completed Divine Invader test series with integrated CCAS.

-   Began technology feasibility study for a Biological Combat
    Assessment System (BCAS).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed chemical source term validation testing for collateral
    effects prediction tool.

-   Delivered final hazard source models for Counterproliferation 2
    (CP2) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) standoff
    weapons.

-   Developed initial ensemble weather forecasting for planning tools.

-   Provided Hazard Prediction and Assessment Capability (HPAC) modules
    for Integrated Target Planning Toolset (ITPTS) 2.0 to meet USEUCOM
    final product requirements.

-   Delivered and validated HPAC 4.03 (version increases functionality
    of planning tools not specifically addressed, such as industrial
    chemical and nuclear facilities) for Dipole Zodiac and Dipole Yukon
    demonstrations.

-   Validated Integrated Munitions Effects Assessment (IMEA) 4.2
    software version includes additional target types, weapons including
    multiple weapon effects, weather interfaces and sources, and more
    detailed weapon input parameters (such as angle of attack).) to
    support Dipole Zodiac and Dipole Yukon 2 (JASSM).

-   Delivered and validated final version of IMEA incorporating CP2 ACTD
    weapons effects data.

-   Delivered ITPTS 2.0 that includes access to additional IC data
    sources and interface to other targeting tools through the Joint
    Targeting Toolbox (JTT) and Electronic Target Folder (ETF).

-   Completed the first phase of the integration of WinJMEM into ITPTS,
    begin integration of the Joint Technical Group for Munitions Effects
    (JTCG/ME) Air-to-Surface Weaponeering System (JAWS) into ITPTS.

-   Continued IMEA C3I facility model validation testing.

-   Performed sub-scale validation tests to support the CP2 full-scale
    operational tests.

-   Began the independent validation of ITPTS 2.0 and submit the
    Accreditation Support Package (ASP) to the JTCG/ME for
    accreditation.

-   Completed the integration of the JTCG/ME weaponeering product
    WinJMEM into ITPTS.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed the independent validation of MEA 5.0 (version included
    additional target types (including complex facilities), additional
    weapons as developed in the Weapons area below (including multiple
    weapon effects), and additional platforms) to support the CALCM and
    JASSM demonstrations in CP2 ACTD and submit the Accreditation
    Support Package (ASP) to the JTCG/ME for accreditation.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator Variant (TTPV) penetrator
    payload system design, missile systems design and engineering, and
    air-vehicle modification design and fabrication.

-   Conducted TTPV penetrator system test and evaluation.

-   Conducted TTPV Flight Event Demonstrations.

-   Analyzed results from the Divine Canberra (DC) demonstration.

-   Completed design and effectiveness studies for the Hard and Deeply
    Buried Target Defeat (HDBTD) classified weapon concept.

-   Transitioned Prompt Agent Defeat technology into DERF-funded
    CrashPAD Quick Reaction Capability (QRC) project.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed target refurbishment for Divine Canberra and Dipole Zodiac
    demonstrations.

-   Conducted Dipole Zodiac 2 demonstration, Conventional Air Launched
    Cruise Missile (CALCM) and analyze results.

-   Conducted Divine Canberra 1 and 2 demonstrations for TTPV, CCAS, and
    planning/analysis tools.

-   Completed Midway Fuchsia 3 demonstration of CrashPAD Weapon
    (BLU-119/B).

-   Completed Divine Invader flight-testing of CCAS.

-   Analyzed results from Divine Canberra (DC) demonstration.

-   Supported USEUCOM\'s military utility assessment of all CP2
    deliverables.

-   Developed testbed to provide necessary demonstration and validation
    capability for new hard and deeply buried target defeat
    technologies.

-   Completed payload plan and weaponization plan for Thermobaric Weapon
    (TW) demonstration.

-   Initiated integration of thermobaric payload material with weapon
    system and firing system.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completed Prompt Agent Defeat (PAD) QRC project.

-   Started scale tests for agent neutralization.

-   Completed four small-scale tests for agent neutralization.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiated non-energetic agent defeat program-Classified.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Initiated Standoff High-Speed Option for Counterproliferation (SHOC)
    project.

-   Conducted Military Utility Study of SHOC concept.

-   Developed and released request for proposals for SHOC ACTD.

#  FY 2004 Plans

-   Transition CCAS residuals to customer and provide sustaining support
    and training.

-   Complete military utility assessment (MUA) of CCAS

-   Complete technology feasibility assessment for a Biological Combat
    Assessment System (BCAS).

-   Complete BCAS requirements development and produce system
    specification.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete target refurbishment for post-Divine Canberra and Dipole
    Zodiac demonstrations.

-   Provide residual support to CP2 ACTD products.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Produce Synthetic Exercise Environment (SEE) database and
    cartographic products for SHAPE Able Ally FY 2004 exercise.

-   Implement SEE Atlantis digital terrain mapping enhancements for
    EUCOM.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Completion of small-scale optimization for PAD.

-   Initiate agent denial & disrupt projects.

-   Complete initial laboratory phase of non-energetic agent defeat
    program

-   Begin standardized bioassay program to support agent defeat
    development.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Continue agent defeat weapons effect modeling.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct sub-scale demonstration of taggant technologies.

-   Develop weapon integration concepts for taggant use in BLU-116 and
    BLU-119.

-   Deliver taggant sensor concept of operations.

-   Begin Biological Combat Assessment System (BCAS) ATD program, Spiral
    1, Biological Collector only

-   Identify combat command priority, time-sensitive targets (TST),
    conduct project planning, and initiate acquisition of target
    simulators.

###### FY 2005 Plans 

-   Continue Biological Combat Assessment System (BCAS) ATD program,
    Spiral 1.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Prepare CCAS for possible US Air Force System Development and
    Demonstration (SDD) program start in FY 2005.

-   Support CCAS residuals and training programs.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Complete residual support to CP2 ACTD products.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct full-scale static testing of optimized PAD weapon.

-   Develop weaponized agent defeat technology.

-   Deliver Energetic Kill Capabilities Study.

-   Deliver Non-Energetic Kill Trade/Cost Study.

-   Conduct demonstration of agent defeat payload in a BLU-109 against
    simulated hardened biological facility.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct mid-scale demonstration of taggant technologies.

-   Conduct TST small-scale test.

-   Start mid-scale TST tests.

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  CP Analysis and Planning System           13.3      0         0
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

########  FY 2003 Accomplishments

-   Completed the second round of Counterproliferation Analysis and
    Planning System (CAPS) analytical production on 30 September 2002:

######### Level 1-3 analysis on the remaining six CP Mission Support Senior Oversight Group (MS SOG) near-term country programs

######### Level 4 analysis of 40 facilities

######### Level 5 analysis of 5 facilities. 

-   Continued CAPSNET terminal installations at major commands, priority
    supporting commands, and support agencies; installations in advanced
    planning for FY 2002 are EUCOM (JAC), USFK (PACOM), DIA, WINPAC
    (CIA), and SOUTHCOM. Other potential CAPSNET installations for FY
    2002 are JFCOM (CMSALANT/JFIC), EUCOM (Stuttgart/Ramstein), and
    potentially other supporting organizations.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Upgraded SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network connectivity to a
    full T-1 line with a 2^nd^ T-1 line planned.

-   Installed Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS)
    CAPS server at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL),
    providing more up-to-date information than was currently available
    to CAPS users.

########  FY 2004 Plans (Activity and funding reprogrammed to USSOCOM in FY 04)

**FY 2005 Plans (Activity and funding transferred to USSOCOM in FY05)**

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  SOF CP Support                            0.5       12.5      14.5
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

**FY 2003 Accomplishments**

-   Deployed eight ACTD technologies in support of operations in the
    Middle East.

-   Specific details are classified.

**FY 2004 Plans**

-   Execute ACTD in June 2004.

-   Execute smooth transition of ACTD residuals that demonstrated
    military utility in the exercise.

-   Further ACTD details are classified.

-   Down-select approved technologies for inclusion in SOF Chem ATD.

-   Execute ATD kick-off meeting.

-   Initiate construction of final demonstration targets for SOF Chem
    ATD.

> **FY 2004 Plans (continued)**

-   Perform Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) for SOF Venture.

-   Identify and select specific technologies that will be pursued in
    Phase 1 of SOF Venture.

-   Conduct operational assessment of selected candidate technologies by
    SOF Venture user/customers.

-   Develop SOF Venture program plans and spend plans for the activity
    and each technical area.

-   Start specific SOF Venture kick-off meetings for technologies funded
    under each technical area

-   Specific details are classified.

**FY 2005 Plans**

-   Iteratively develop selected technologies performing early user test
    and evaluations.

-   Continue target construction for final demonstration.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Conduct individual technology testing for SOF Venture.

-   Determine military utility assessment test protocol for SOF Venture.

-   Conduct Integrated Project Reviews (IPR) for each technology in SOF
    Venture.

-   Conduct second technology review and AOA for SOF Venture.

-   Develop Early User Test and Evaluation (EUT&E) test bed for SOF
    Venture.

-   Specific details of individual technologies will be SECRET SPECAT.

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in millions)**                 **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  Hard Target Defeat                        11.8      12.5      7.4
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

**FY 2003 Accomplishments**

-   Completed final preparations for C3I demonstration for the HDBTD
    classified weapons.

-   Initiated construction of full-scale underground facility target
    complex at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) to support Thermobaric
    ACTD.

-   Completed a feasibility study for alternative warhead case designs
    and small-scale bombproof testing of explosive candidates.

-   Began development of integrated planning and modeling tools to
    support Tunnel Defeat ACTD**.**

**FY 2004 Plans**

-   Conduct and analyze C3I defeat demonstration.

-   Develop Thermobaric (TB) explosive models to support mission
    planning/analysis tools and conduct sub-scale testing of explosive
    candidates.

-   Complete construction of full-scale underground facility target
    complex.

-   Complete Thermobaric warhead design and fuze integration evaluations
    at White Sands Missile Range.

-   Verify tunnel response and ground shock high fidelity codes against
    known solutions to support Tunnel Target Defeat ACTD.

**FY 2005 Plans**

-   Conduct weapon qualification tests and initiate weapon flight
    qualification testing for Thermobaric ACTD.

-   Develop weapon modules for mission planning/analysis tools for
    Thermobaric (TB) ACTD.

-   Produce test assets for TB ACTD Operational Demonstration (DISCRETE
    FORTUNA).

-   Complete Tunnel Target Defeat ACTD experiments used to support
    development of a ground shock simulator.

-   Design ground shock simulator to support Tunnel Defeat ACTD.

-   Complete and analyze C3I facility defeat demonstration

-   Develop the IMPACT Proof of Concept Demonstration operational
    concept.

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performer:** Approximately \$9M of FY 2003 funding was
obligated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory located in
California in support of the Counterforce project.

+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| **Cost (\$ in           | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | **C |
| millions)**             | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | FY | ost |
|                         | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | t   |
|                         | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | o** |
|                         | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |     |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | **C |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | omp |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | let |
|                         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    | e** |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+
| Project BN --           | 23 | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0   |
| Unconventional Nuclear  | .0 |    |    |    |    |    |    |     |
| Warfare Defense         |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |     |
+-------------------------+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-----+

**A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:**

-   The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 vividly demonstrated the
    need to expand the U.S. efforts to develop and field systems that
    can defend against threats posed by Weapons of Mass Destruction
    (WMD). One of the most unsettling and dangerous threats to the U.S.
    homeland is the possibility of nuclear terrorism using
    unconventional methods (i.e., delivery of an Improvised Nuclear
    Device (IND), Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD) or an actual
    nuclear weapon by other than missile or military aircraft). In July
    2001, the Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force Report on
    Unconventional Nuclear Warfare Defense further elaborated on this
    increasing threat to the U.S. To defend against this threat,
    Congress commended the Defense Science Board (DSB) report and
    directed the Unconventional Nuclear Warfare Defense (UNWD) program
    and funds to restore the historic balance between operational needs
    and sustaining R&D investments within the nuclear search arena in
    the FY 2002 DoD Appropriation. The UNWD program is designed to
    develop a prescribed list of equipment and procedures for a series
    of systems that can detect, give early warning, and establish a
    successful response to an unconventional nuclear warfare (UNW)
    attack. At its end state, the program's equipment list and
    procedures will be rapidly transferable to other interested Federal,
    State, local or private organizations to provide such protection to
    their critical sites. This list and procedures will be developed
    through a rigorous series of experiments, demonstrations and
    red-teaming processes at four test-beds. UNWD, as authorized, is a
    joint DTRA-NNSA program directed to demonstrate integrated nuclear
    warfare protection systems at the four test-beds established for
    this purpose. The Terrorist Device Defeat (TDD) program is being
    used to restore the historic balance between operational needs and
    sustaining R&D investments.

**B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:**

  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------
  **Cost (\$ in thousands)**                **FY      **FY      **FY
                                            2003**    2004**    2005**

  Unconventional Nuclear Warfare Defense    23.0      0         0
  ----------------------------------------- --------- --------- ---------

##### FY 2003 Accomplishments 

-   Establish a UNWD test bed at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay,
    Georgia. Refine and demonstrate prototype system using available
    technology and exercise a CONOPS for response.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Establish a UNWD test bed at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Continue
    to refine and demonstrate prototype system using available
    technology and exercise a CONOPS for response.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Establish a UNWD test bed at Ft. Leonard Wood, Missouri. Continue to
    refine and demonstrate prototype system using available technology
    and exercise a CONOPS for response.

> Note: The Department reprogrammed a portion of FY 2003 funding that
> was appropriated as O&M funding for this effort to the RDT&E
> appropriation.

**FY 2004 Plans: N/A**

######## FY 2005 Plans: N/A

**C. Other Program Funding Summary:** N/A

**D. Acquisition Strategy:** N/A

**E. Major Performers:** Approximately \$15M of FY 2003 funding was
obligated with the National Nuclear Security Administration located in
New Mexico in support of the Unconventional Nuclear Warfare Defense.