BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
![](media/image1.jpeg){width="1.1659722222222222in"
height="1.1236111111111111in"} ![](media/image2.png) (Flyer last revised
5/9/06)

*[Location]{.underline}:* Imperial Irrigation District Auditorium,1285
Broadway Av., El Centro, CA

*Event Co-Sponsors & Partners*: **Imperial Irrigation District,**
**COLAB of Imperial County, Imperial Valley Press, Imperial Valley
Economic Development Corporation, Imperial Valley College SBDC, and the
San Diego World Trade Center.**

The San Diego District Export Council (San Diego and Imperial Counties),
in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Commerce, are offering a
unique seminar to familiarize local businesses with the emerging
**export market potential for Imperial Valley companies**. This seminar
is a great opportunity to learn the important aspects of exporting. You
will receive step-by-step information and assistance from government and
private experts in commerce and foreign trade to connect your business
with the rest of the world. Highlights of this seminar include:

-   **Overview of the Best Export Prospects**

-   **Finding Foreign Buyers & Distributors**

-   **New Customs Regulations, Shipping & Logistics**

-   **Agricultural Exports**

-   **Export Financing Options**

-   **Tourism & Exporting**

Please send R.S.V.P. to Lia Wright no later than May 26th^.^ Seating is
limited. The participation fee includes lunch, and is only \$10 in
advance, and \$20 at the door with no RSVP. Make checks payable to San
Diego District Export Council (DEC). Display table booths and event
sponsorships are available by calling the DEC at (619) 557-7826.

*[**Please mail, fax, or email this form to**:]{.underline}*

San Diego Area District Export Council

Attention: Lia Wright

6363 Greenwich Drive, #230, San Diego, CA 92122

<lia.wright@mail.doc.gov> , fax 619-557-6176

## [Registration Form:]{.underline} 

Name(s):
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Title:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Company:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Street Address:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

City, State, Zip:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Phone:
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_Fax:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

E-Mail:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Enclosed is \$:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_(or) [I commit to
pay \$10 at door:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}

[\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}
![](media/image1.png){width="0.6541666666666667in"
height="0.6597222222222222in"}

**PUBLIC NOTICE**

**Federal Communications Commission**

**445 12th St., S.W.**

**Washington, D.C. 20554**

Released: 1/26/00

#  

# 

#  WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 

**OBSOLETES FCC FORM 574**

Effective March 1, 2000, FCC Form 574 is obsolete and will no longer be
accepted for filing. This form was previously used by Part 95 applicants
in the General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) and the 218-219 MHz Service
(formerly known as the Interactive Video Data Service or IVDS).

GMRS was converted to the Universal Licensing System (ULS) on April 19,
1999. Effective August 12, 1999, GMRS applicants must file FCC Form 605
for all licensing activity. See Public Notice DA 99-653 released October
15, 1999 for further information, or visit the Commission's ULS website
at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/uls.

218-219 MHz Service applicants should use FCC Form 600 in lieu of FCC
Form 574. The two-letter radio service code for the 218-219 MHz Service
is "ZV". Filings in this service submitted on FCC Form 574 on or after
March 1, 2000 will be dismissed.

FCC forms may be obtained from the Forms Distribution Center by calling
1-800-418-FORM (3676); from fax-on-demand by dialing (202) 418-0177 from
the handset of a fax machine; or downloaded from the FCC's website at .

Further questions concerning this notice may be directed to the FCC's
Consumer Center in Gettysburg, PA by calling 1-888-CALLFCC
(1-888-225-5322).

-FCC-
**Released: July 13, 2001**

# DA 01-1652

## REMINDER OF

**BIENNIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING**

**FOR**

**NONCOMMERCIAL EDUCATIONAL BROADCAST STATION LICENSEES**

Each noncommercial educational radio and television broadcast station
licensee must submit a current and complete ownership report (FCC Form
323-E) every two years on the anniversary date of its station's renewal
application filing date. This biennial filing requirement has commenced
in calendar year 2001. On or before August 1, 2001, an ownership report
(FCC Form 323-E, September 2000 Edition) should be filed by
noncommercial educational licensees whose radio or television stations
are located in the States of California, Illinois, North Carolina, South
Carolina and Wisconsin. At two-month intervals throughout 2001, the
remaining noncommercial educational licensees will file their stations'
biennial ownership reports. Subsequent Public Notices will be issued
advising these licensees of their scheduled filing dates.

FCC Form 323-E (September 2000 Edition) is to be used in submitting the
noncommercial educational biennial ownership report. This form may be
obtained by writing to the Commission's Form Distribution Center, 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capital Heights, Maryland 20743, or by telephoning
1-800-418-3676 and leaving a request on the answering machine provided
for this purpose. FCC Form 323-E is also available through the Internet.
To retrieve this form by using the Internet, access the FCC's Web Site,
[http://www.fcc.gov]{.underline}, and click on the Forms link.

FCC Form 323-E (September 2000 Edition) is also available by using the
Mass Media Bureau's Consolidated Database System (CDBS) electronic
filing system. This system provides noncommercial educational licensees
with the ability to fill out the biennial FCC 323-E's on-line via the
Internet from the Mass Media Bureau's Web Site,
[http://www.fcc.gov/mmb]{.underline}, and to file them electronically
with the Commission. Licensees intending to file electronically should
consult the "CDBS Electronic Filing System User's Guide" prior to
completion and submission of their

FCC 323-E's. Internet access to the CDBS requires a user to have, at a
minimum, a browser such as Netscape version 3.04 or Internet Explorer
version 3.51. Noncommercial educational licensees are strongly
encouraged to file their biennial FCC 323-E's electronically.

For further information, please contact LeAudrey Alexander at (202)
418-1627 or Chandler Bryant at (202) 418-1626.

**- FCC -**
\-\-\-\--Original Message\-\-\-\--

From: John Barfknecht
\[[[mailto:thedocva@juno.com]{.underline}](mailto:thedocva@juno.com)\]

Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 3:05 PM

To: comments

Subject: Requested comments

Thanks

# Cover sheet 

The President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform.

John J. Barfknecht, Sr.

An individual taxpaying citizen.

Submitted February 23, 2005

Comments:

Category 1 HEADACHES.

I currently spend in the neighborhood of two (2) weeks each year
preparing taxes, the

preparation of taxes is unnecessarily complex. Because I do prepare my
own taxes I live

in fear of making a mistake that would cause the IRS to flag my return.
I feel that the

current implementation is considered by myself and others as a
punishment. The IRS is

an enforcement agency for my voluntarily attempting to report my fair
share of tax.

Category 2 ASPECTS THAT ARE UNFAIR.

I feel that deductions such as real estate interest are not fair to all
taxpayers, and do not

reflect well on a single industry. Why am I not encouraged to have a
deduction for other

things such as a car a boat or an RV?. The concept of allowing a
deduction for one

expense yet not another is to me ludicrous.

The current tax code allows someone that lives below the poverty level
to obtain a

"REFUND" of monies that they did not even pay. How can I make \$10,000
and receive

a refund greater than that which I paid in tax.? Since I did not pay the
money in. yet I

get it back, this "REFUND" is being subsidized by the other taxpayers.
Another

definition of this subsidy if it occurred outside the government
umbrella would "PONZI"

or "EXTORTION" or "THEFT".

Category 3 SPECIFIC DECISIONS DISTORTED BY THE TAX CODE.

Some of the time I trade securities, under the current code whenever I
sell a security I am

Subject to tax on that sale, yet that sale could be taxed at two
different rates based on

How long I have owned the security, if I have owned it more than 1 year
it gets taxed at

a different rate. Please tell me how this makes sense?

If I protect my profits by placing a stop loss on a security it in some
cases protects my

profits, it could also creates "instant income". In order to avoid taxes
on the stop loss I

must stay out of that particular security for 31 Days, this waiting
period may also cause

me to lose money.

Category 4 GOALS THE PANEL SHOULD TRY TO ACHIEVE.

The panel should take into accounts the powers that were given in the
constitution to the

Legislative branch.

The Panel should take into account how many things are taxed even before
they are

consumed. Taxation should not occur on wages, taxation should not occur
on unfinished

goods.

The panel should consider the complete abolishment of the IRS.

The panel should achieve a single tax rate that does not require
deductions.

The panel should consider complete tax reform as proposed in HR 25 and
SR 25.

Thank you for your time.
CHAPTER 100 - NATURE AND PURPOSE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

**(100)-10** [Introduction](../../100-10/chapter100-10.doc)

1.  Abbreviations and Acronyms

2.  Purpose

10.3 Background

**(100)-20** [Nature of the System](../../100-20/chapter100-20.doc)

**(100)-30** [Responsibilities](../../100-30/chapter100-30.doc)

30.1 Development and Issuance

30.2 Technical Expertise

**(100)-40** [Treasury Orders](../../100-40/chapter100-40.doc)

> [Exhibit (100)-40.1](../../100-exhibits/chapter100_ex40_1.doc)
> Treasury Order

**(100)-50** [Treasury Directives](../../100-50/chapter100-50.doc)

> [Exhibit (100)-50.1](../../100-exhibits/chapter100_ex50_1.doc)
> Treasury Directive

**(100)-60** [TIGTA Delegation Orders](../../100-60/chapter100-60.doc)

> 60.1 Purpose
>
> 60.2 Originating Authority
>
> 60.3 Content
>
> 60.4 Responsibility
>
> [Exhibit (100)-60.1](../../100-exhibits/chapter100_ex60_1.doc)
> Delegation Order

**(100)-70** [TIGTA Operations Manual](../../100-70/chapter100-70.doc)

1.  Nature and Purpose

2.  Contents

3.  Development and Review

4.  Format

5.  Style

6.  Annual Policy Review

7.  Archiving

> [Exhibit (100)-70.1](../../100-exhibits/chapter100_ex70_1.doc) Manual
> Transmittal
>
> [Exhibit (100)-70.2](../../100-exhibits/chapter100_ex70_2.doc)
> Operations Manual
>
> [Exhibit (100)-70.3](../../100-exhibits/chapter100_ex70_3.doc) Table
> of Contents

**(100)-80** [TIGTA Memoranda](../../100-80/chapter100-80.doc)

1.  General

2.  Nature and Purpose

3.  Identification

4.  Review and Clearance

**(100)-90** [DIGA (Audit) Memoranda](../../100-90/chapter100-90.doc)**\
**90.1 General

> 90.2 Nature and Purpose

3.  Identification

4.  Review and Clearance

(100)-100 [DIGI (Investigations)
Memoranda](../../100-100/chapter100-100.doc)

> 100.1 General
>
> 100.2 Nature and Purpose
>
> 100.3 Identification
>
> 100.4 Review and Clearance

**\
(100)-110** [CC (Chief Counsel)
Memoranda](../../100-110/chapter100-110.doc)

> 110.1. General
>
> 110.2. Nature and Purpose
>
> 110.3. Identification
>
> 110.4. Review and Clearance

**(100)-120** [AIGIT (Information Technology)
Memoranda](../../100-120/chapter100-120.doc)

> 120.1 General
>
> 120.2 Nature and Purpose
>
> 120.3 Identification

120.4 Review and Clearance

**(100)-130** [AIGMS (Management Services)
Memoranda](../../100-130/chapter100-130.doc)

> 130.1 General
>
> 130.2 Nature and Purpose
>
> 130.3 Identification

130.4 Review and Clearance
**§20.1502 Rule 1502. Eligibility.**

To participate in the Initiative, a claimant must:

\(a\) At the time the Agreement and Waiver of Rights is executed, have a
representative, as defined in §20.1501(d) of this part;

\(b\) Reside within the jurisdiction of a participating VA regional
office, as defined in §20.1501(e) of this part; and

\(c\) File one of the following types of claims for VA disability
compensation as outlined in parts 3 and 4 of this chapter at a
participating VA regional office:

\(1\) Original claim;

\(2\) Claim for an increased rating;

\(3\) Claim to reopen a previously-denied claim based on the submission
of new and material evidence as provided in §3.156 of this chapter; or

\(4\) Requests for revision of a decision of an agency of original
jurisdiction under §3.105 of this chapter based on clear and
unmistakable error. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))
Spallation Neutron Source

Tony Gabriel

##### 

##### 104 Union Valley Road, 

##### Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8218

# 

Date: 5/2/00

# 

# conc.: Feasibility Study of a Neutrino Source Based on a Muon Storage Ring

Dear Tony, Dear members of the Target Team,

I want to thank you and your stuff for the outstanding contribution to
the feasibility study. This study has by now received world wide
attention and the results as well as the quality has impressed many
people, certainly including the Fermilab management. Your work on the
target itself and the target station especially, has brought the kind of
realism and technical feasibility into the study, which is necessary to
convince the community that this is something honestly to consider and a
realistic option for the High Energy Physics program. You collaboration
with the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, with people at
Fermilab and after all with the Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider
Collaboration finally made it possible that all this came together in
time. I m very impressed with the competence in you group and the
professional way you have attacked this problem and finally solved it.
Phil Spampinato, who spent a significant fraction of his time on this
subject over the last seven month, deserves special credit at this
point.

I definitely hope that we will continue to work together to make the
following R&D program work out just as well as the feasibility study to
launch into a final proposal in a couple of years from now.

Yours

cc: Steve Holmes (Assoc. Director), Mike Shaevitz (Assoc. Director),
John Marriner (Division Head, BD)
**The SSOA Program:**

**A Semantically Powered Architecture to\
Enable Inter-Agency Capabilities Sharing**

**Lt. Cmdr. Sam Chance, US Navy, Retired**

**Sponsored by:**

**The Metadata Review Group**

**The NASA Goddard Library**

**The Ontology Working Group**

**and**

**The Semantic Web Interest Group**

**February 23, 2006**

**10:00-Noon**

**Building 21, Room 183B**

**10:00am Welcome and Introductions (Gail Hodge, GSFC)**

**10:15am Presentation by Lt. Cmdr. Chance\
**

**11:00am Roundtable Discussion on Metadata, Semantic Web and Ontology
Activities (All)**

**Noon Adjourn**
**Objective:** To collect fossil evidence of early animals; To
understand types of fossils

**Method:** Students will collect fossils from dredge spoil area and try
to identify discoveries.

**Background:** There are many animals roaming Cumberland Island today.

-   Ask the students what kinds of animals they expect to see. (deer,
    hogs, turkey, armadillo, etc)

-   Explain that though the animals are here, they may not see them. How
    would they know what animals are present? (tracks, scat (droppings),
    bite marks on leaves, feathers, bones, shells, etc)

-   Ask what kind of evidence would last the longest. (bones, shells,
    things that are hard) Why? (they are more dense and harder so they
    won't break down quickly)

-   Explain that this is true of animals present a long time ago. The
    softer things like feathers, scat, etc usually decompose faster
    while harder things last longer. Over time, these items become
    fossils.

-   Depending on detail, descriptions of types of fossils can be given:
    body fossils like bones, teeth, shells; trace fossils like
    footprints, coprolites (feces); resin fossils like amber;
    chemofossils (trace chemicals)

**Procedure:** Walk students to site.

-   Explain that they will be conducting a survey of the area to
    determine what animals may have been present by collecting fossils.

-   Show a modern bone. Ask the students to describe it. (white, hard,
    long, etc)

-   Show a fossilized bone. Ask the students to comparer it with the
    modern bone. (dark, hard, short, a small piece, etc)

-   Explain that most fossils they will be finding are going to be dark
    in color and probably in pieces. Show the examples but do not
    identify them at this time.

-   Set boundaries and have students stay in buddy groups of 2-3. They
    should not be separated from their buddy and stay within sight of
    their chaperone.

-   Spread out in area and collect specimens.

-   After 30 minutes, gather students and compare specimens. Identify
    any if possible. Explain that not all specimens can be identified.
    That is OK. Even the experts have trouble. Students can keep their
    specimens for use in classroom.

**Evaluation:** Ask the students the following questions.

Based on fossil evidence collected today, what kinds of animals lived on
or around Cumberland Island long ago? (sharks, rays, whales, camels,
horses, etc) Are any of these types still here today? Why would
scientists want to know what animals were here then and not now as well
as ones still here? (study climate change, ocean levels, extinctions)

**Follow --up activities:** have students compile the number of each
fossil found in class. Graph the results to see which fossils were the
most common found.

Have students look at maps of Georgia that show various ocean levels.
Ask why that influenced the type of fossils found.

Have the students make mud fossils.
**Lesson Info**

-   **Lesson Number:** FPPD-LL-0008

-   **Lesson Date:** 25-jul-2000

-   **Submitting Organization:** GSFC (415)

-   **Submitted by:** R. McGlynn

**Subject/Title/Topic(s):**

Approval Process for Launch Vehicle (LV) / Spacecraft (SC) Interface
Control Document (ICD) Changes

**Description of Driving Event:**

Changes to an approved LV/SC ICD are submitted via an Interface Revision
Notice (IRN) document. The existing formal approval process requires the
signatures of NASA-GSFC (SC), NASA-KSC (LV), and the LV contractor on
all IRN submittals. Noticeably absent from the formal process is the SC
contractor. NASA-GSFC and the SC contractor have an informal agreement
whereby the change is reviewed and concurrence is documented via e-mail
correspondence. During the GOES-L "Red Team" review process the omission
of the SC contractor in the formal review/approval process raised the
question of legal/liability issues.

**Lesson(s) Learned:**

The formal ICD approval process should include the SC contractor in
order to ensure comprehensive review/accountability by all parties.

**Recommendation(s):**

The SC contractor should be added to the formal LV/SC ICD
review/approval process. The IRN document should be changed to include a
signature block for the SC contractor.

**Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness:** N/A

**Applicable NASA Enterprise(s):**

Space Science

Earth Science

**Applicable Crosscutting Process(es):**

Approval

Implementation

**Additional Key Phrase(s):**

Configuration Management

Spacecraft

Launch Vehicle

**Can this lesson be included in the International Safety Lessons
Learned (ISLL) Database?** Yes

**Submitted by:** R. McGlynn

**Mail Stop/Code:** GSFC/415

**Lesson Author (if different):** N/A

**Phone Number:** 301-286-3972

**E-Mail Address:** rmcglynn@pop400.gsfc.nasa.gov

**Lesson Date:** 07 / 25 / 2000
[The CEO Coalition]{.underline}

To Advance Sustainable Technology

***- Further, a market can only function efficiently with adequate data
and sufficient participation. Therefore, the CEO
Coalition* *supports* *voluntary greenhouse gas reporting as an initial
step, however; we are concerned that a * *voluntary* *national reporting
program might not generate sufficient participation to both form the
basis for future markets and serve the President\'s overall goals, given
other federal and states' efforts on greenhouse gas reporting.
Therefore, DOE should work to harmonize differing registries (federal
and state) and thereby negate the need for competing options.
Alternately, DOE should recognize and account for state registry
reductions as part of the President's overall goals. Having 1605(b)
reporting account for and quantify emission reductions registered in
competing registries would eliminate the possibility of double counting.
The CEO Coalition believes that the Department\'s voluntary emissions
reporting approach should be considered a first, but not necessarily
adequate system, and should work to maximize reporting by accounting for
and including reductions registered in competing greenhouse gas
registries. The Senate version of the Energy Policy Act of 2002
contained*   *a mandatory trigger mechanism whereby the federal
reporting system would become a mandatory reporting system for
significant emitters if, after a specified period of time (perhaps three
to five years), there is insufficient voluntary reporting (perhaps less
than 60% of total eligible emissions.)* * * *We would support adoption
of a similar provision, either via regulation or, if necessary, in the
form of legislation, given DOE's successful harmonization of other
federal and state registries and insufficient reporting by significant
emitters.***
Voluntary Report - public distribution

**Date:** 10/17/2006

**GAIN Report Number:** PL6067

PL6067

**Poland**

**Strawberries**

**Anti-dumping protective measures against Chinese frozen strawberries**

**2006**

**Approved by:**

![](media/image1.wmf)Ed Porter

U S Embassy

**Prepared by:**

JF

**Report Highlights:**

Polish officials are pleased that the EU, on October 18, 2006, will
implement temporary anti-dumping protective measures against imports of
Chinese frozen strawberries.

Includes PSD Changes: No

Includes Trade Matrix: No

Unscheduled Report

Warsaw \[PL1\]

\[PL\]

Polish officials are pleased that the EU, on October 18, 2006, will
implement temporary anti-dumping protective measures against imports of
Chinese frozen strawberries. The protective measures are being
introduced in response to a request from the Polish government made in
early 2005. In their complaint, Polish officials claimed that Chinese
frozen strawberry exports to Poland and other EU countries were unfairly
undermining the Polish strawberry sector. The temporary anti-dumping
protective measures will be in the form of a customs duty of 34.2
percent, in addition to the regular tariff of 14.4 percent. The
Commission has 15 months to complete its investigation started January
2006, and implement permanent protective measures, if warranted.

> In 2004, the export price for Polish frozen strawberries was about
> 1,800 EUR/MT (USD 2,230) and dropped to about 720 EUR/MT (USD 890) in
> 2005. In contrast, the price of competing Chinese frozen strawberries
> exported to the EU in 2004 was about 610 EUR/MT (USD 750) and fell to
> about 460 EUR/MT (USD 570) in 2005.

For over 100,000 Polish farms strawberry cultivation is a basic source
of income, especially for those in low-income areas. Average annual
exports of fresh and processed strawberries from Poland are valued at
EUR 100 million (USD 124 million) and constitute about 16 percent of all
Polish fresh and processed fruit exports annually.

> Polish government officials and industry representatives hope that the
> Commission will decide to extend the temporary duties for up to the
> 5-year maximum permitted under EU regulations. Many sector experts are
> of the opinion that five years of protection could give enough time to
> the Polish strawberry sector to create strong producer organizations
> and to establish contract production (currently, very rare), which
> they believe would help stabilize production levels and prices in
> Poland.
>
> Experts also noted that should EU anti-dumping duties stay in place,
> Chinese exporters will seek out other markets, which could affect
> other world suppliers, such as the United States.
DA-02-472

March 1, 2002

**DOTCAST, INC. SEEKS FCC CLEARANCE FOR ITS SYSTEM FOR INSERTION OF
NON-VIDEO DATA PURSUANT TO SECTION 73.682 OF THE COMMISSION'S TELEVISION
BROADCAST RULES**

RULES SEC. 73.682(a)(24)(iii)

REQUESTOR Dotcast, Inc.

(Filed by Douglas B. Evans, General Counsel,

Dotcast, Inc.

1808 N. Shoreline Boulevard

Mountain View, CA 94043

and

Margaret L. Tobey, Attorney

Morrison & Foerster LLP

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 5500

Washington, D.C. 20006

DATE RECEIVED November 1, 2001

NATURE OF REQUEST Requests the Commission to authorize broadcast

television licensees to use Dotcast's dNTSC technology

to insert digital data into standard NTSC television

broadcasts pursuant to Section 73.682(a)(24)(iii) of the

Commission's Rules.

Copies of the "Application For Approval Of System For Insertion Of
Non-Video Data Pursuant To Section 73.682" and related supplements are
available for inspection and copying in the FCC Reference Center (Room
CY-A257, 445 12 Street, SW). The duplicating contractor, Qualex
International, will provide for a fee copies of this material. Qualex
International is located at Portals II, 445 12^th^ St., S.W., Room
CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. For additional information, contact
Keith A. Larson, Office of the Bureau Chief, Mass Media Bureau at (202)
418-2600 or Gordon Godfrey of the Policy and Rules Division of the Mass
Media Bureau at (202) 418-2190.
Triple F

A comet nucleus sample return mission for ESA's Cosmic Vision program

M. Küppers^1^, H. U. Keller^1^, E. Kührt^2^,

P. Ehrenfreund^3^ and the Triple F team

^1^ Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Katlenburg-Lindau,
Germany

^2^ Institut für Planetenforschung, DLR, Germany

^3^ Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden, The Netherlands

# Rationale

We propose the Triple F mission in context of ESA's Cosmic Vision plan.
After detailed investigation of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko by the
Rosetta orbiter and lander, a sample return mission is the logical next
step in cometary exploration.

# Scientific background

In comets we find a mixture of original interstellar grains with
material that was re-processed in the solar nebula. That mixture is of
particular interest for the study of the formation of the solar system.
Laboratory investigations of samples brought back from different (active
and inactive) regions of a comet reveal this mixture of low and high
temperature compounds. The Stardust mission has shown that those
compounds are intimately mixed on small scales (Brownlee et al. 2006, Mc
Keegan et al. 2006). The analysis of the returned sample from a cometary
nucleus will determine the processes of the formation of the planetary
system and their chronology. It will be possible to determine how far
and in which proportion material processed near the Sun during the
formation of our planetary system was transported out into the Kuiper
belt where it was mixed with pristine interstellar material. A
stratigraphic sample from a cometary nucleus will reveal the structure
of the intricate porous mixture of ice-dust grains that make up a comet
nucleus and provide for its unique activity.

# 

# The mission

A relatively small spacecraft will be launched into its interplanetary
trajectory to a short period comet. After a short monitoring period near
the cometary nucleus, needed to find suitable sampling spots, the
spacecraft will touch down on the surface of the nucleus to collect
samples. The sampling depth will be several decimeters. Finally the
cooled samples will be returned to Earth. The mission is proposed to
ESA's Cosmic Vision and exploration programs, in co-operation with the
Russian space agency.

# References

Brownlee, D. et al., (2006), *Science* **314,** 1711-1716.

McKeegan, K. D. et al., (2006), *Science* **314,** 1724-1727.
**Standard Form 1199A**

(Rev. June 1987) OMB No. 1510-0007

Prescribed by Treasury

Department

Treasury Dept. Cir. 1076

> **DIRECTIONS**
>
> **SECTION 1** *(TO BE COMPLETED BY PAYEE)*
>
> SIGNATURE

**SECTION 2** *(TO BE COMPLETED BY PAYEE OR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION)*

**SECTION 3** *(TO BE COMPLETED BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTION)*

> Financial institutions should refer to the GREEN BOOK for further
> instructions.

**THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTION SHOULD MAIL THE COMPLETED FORM TO THE
GOVERNMENT AGENCY IDENTIFIED ABOVE.**

NSN 7540-01-058-0224 1199-207
DA 09-193

February 6, 2009

**WRC-11 Advisory Committee**

**SCHEDULES SECOND MEETING FOR march 31, 2009**

IB Docket No. 04-286

The second meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2011 World
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-11 Advisory Committee) will be held
on March 31, 2009; from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon in the Commission
Meeting Room (TW-C305), 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. A draft
agenda of the meeting is attached.

The Commission's WRC-11 website (http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-11) contains
the latest updated information and agendas on all scheduled meetings and
Advisory Committee matters. Documents of all WRC-11 Advisory Committee
meetings are available for public inspection and photocopying at the
FCC's Reference Information Center on the Court Yard Level (Room
CY-A257), 445 12^th^ Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. (telephone:
202-418-0270, TTY: 202-418-2555). In addition, copies of the documents
can be purchased through the FCC's duplication contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402,
Washington, DC 20554; Telephone (202) 488-5300; Fax (202) 488-5563; TTY
(202) 488-5562. Best Copy and Printing, Inc. may be reached by e-mail at
fcc@bcpiweb.com or via BCPI's web site at: www.bcpiweb.com

Comments may be presented at the WRC-11 Advisory Committee meeting or by
email to:

wrc-11@fcc.gov.

For additional information please contact Alexander Roytblat, the
Designated Federal Official for the WRC-11 Advisory Committee, at (202)
418-7501 or Donna Christianson, Secretariat for the WRC-11 Advisory
Committee, at (202) 418-7326.

**AGENDA**

**Second Meeting of the WRC-11 Advisory Committee**

**Federal Communications Commission**

**445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-C305**

**Washington, D.C. 20554**

**March 31, 2009; 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon**

1\. Opening Remarks

2\. Approval of Agenda

3\. Approval of the Minutes of the First Meeting

4\. IWG Reports and Documents Relating to Preliminary Views

5\. Future Meetings

6\. Other Business

**- FCC -**
\$\$203.00A

######### Section 203.---REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTIONS

Revised 6 May 2005

# [INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING FOR BRIDGE CONCRETE REMOVAL]{.mark}

\$\$203.04A

4.  Add the following:

> **(a) Concrete Removal by Mechanical Impact Methods**. Furnish
> equipment that complies with the following:
>
> **(1)** Use power-driven hand tools for removal of existing concrete
> with the following restrictions:
>
> *(a)* Do not use jack hammers heavier than 30 pounds [(13.6
> kilograms)]{.mark}.
>
> *(b)* Do not operate 30-pound [(13.6 kilogram)]{.mark} jack hammers
> and mechanical chipping tools at an angle in excess of 45 degrees
> measured from the surface of the slab.
>
> *(c)* Do not use chipping hammers heavier than a nominal 15-pound
> [(6.8-kilogram)]{.mark} class to remove concrete from beneath any
> reinforcing bar.
>
> **(2)** Use hand tools (hammers and chisels) for removal of final
> particles of concrete or to achieve the required depth.
>
> **(b) Reinforcing Steel.** Clean all reinforcing steel that is to
> remain in place and has been exposed by removal operations. Remove all
> rust and corrosive products, including oil, dirt, concrete fragments,
> laitance, loose scale, and other coating of any character that would
> destroy or inhibit the bond with the new concrete.

When cleaned reinforcing steel will be exposed for more than 7 calendar
days before placing the concrete, protect the steel from corrosion and
contamination. Clean and/or replace all reinforcing steel corroded or
contaminated because of the Contractor\'s failure to protect the steel.

> Prevent cutting or damaging reinforcing steel designated to remain in
> place. Repair or replace any damaged bars.

[]{.mark}

*[INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING, IF APPLICABLE]{.mark}*

\$\$203.05A

203.05(b). Delete the Subsection and substitute the following:

> **(b) Burn.** Burning is prohibited. Dispose of material according to
> Subsection 203.05(a).

\$\$203.05B

203.05(c). Add the following after the first sentence of the first
paragraph:

Bury debris beyond the toes of fills in areas authorized by the CO.

\$\$203.05C

203.05(c). Delete the Subsection and substitute the following:

> **(c) Bury.** Burying debris is prohibited. Dispose of material
> according to Subsection 203.05(a).
**Greengenes.arb**

greengenes.arb is based on an early ARB release (6mrz97.arb) that has a
fixed alignment length of 7682 characters. Records downloadable from
greengenes.lbl.gov use this fixed alignment as does the NAST tool for
aligning user-submitted sequences.

The database is regularly updated using the greengenes export tool using
the default settings. Records are initially added to the all_tree using
the parsimony insertion tool. Putative chimeras with divergence ratios
\> 1.1 are not added to the all_tree, but remain in the database so that
they are searchable within ARB. Distance and RAx-ML trees are made from
subsets of the database to verify phylogenetic positioning, but since
sequences are accruing at a high rate, phylogenies are constantly
changing that require new group names, **the database should be
considered a work in progress at all times**

ProkMSA ids are used as the unique identifiers in the database. When
updating greengenes.arb from the website with public records, make sure
to select the "use old names" when you import the sequences. When
importing your own sequences aligned with the NAST aligner use the
"create new names" option. **Never use the "generate new names" option
in the species menu as this will erase the prokMSA ids from the name
field** and create difficulties if you want to overwrite existing
records.
**§4.57 Static foot deformities.**

It is essential to make an initial distinction between bilateral
flatfoot as a congenital or as an acquired condition. The congenital
condition, with depression of the arch, but no evidence of abnormal
callosities, areas of pressure, strain or demonstrable tenderness, is a
congenital abnormality which is not compensable or pensionable. In the
acquired condition, it is to be remembered that depression of the
longitudinal arch, or the degree of depression, is not the essential
feature. The attention should be given to anatomical changes, as
compared to normal, in the relationship of the foot and leg,
particularly to the inward rotation of the superior portion of the os
calcis, medial deviation of the insertion of the Achilles tendon, the
medial tilting of the upper border of the astragalus. This is an
unfavorable mechanical relationship of the parts. A plumb line dropped
from the middle of the patella falls inside of the normal point. The
forepart of the foot is abducted, and the foot everted. The plantar
surface of the foot is painful and shows demonstrable tenderness, and
manipulation of the foot produces spasm of the Achilles tendon, peroneal
spasm due to adhesion about the peroneal sheaths, and other evidence of
pain and limited motion. The symptoms should be apparent without regard
to exercise. In severe cases there is gaping of bones on the inner
border of the foot, and rigid valgus position with loss of the power of
inversion and adduction. Exercise with undeveloped or unbalanced
musculature, producing chronic irritation, can be an aggravating factor.
In the absence of trauma or other definite evidence of aggravation,
service connection is not in order for pes cavus which is a typically
congenital or juvenile disease.

**§4.58 Arthritis due to strain.**

With service incurred lower extremity amputation or shortening, a
disabling arthritis, developing in the same extremity, or in both lower
extremities, with indications of earlier, or more severe, arthritis in
the injured extremity, including also arthritis of the lumbosacral
joints and lumbar spine, if associated with the leg amputation or
shortening, will be considered as service incurred, provided, however,
that arthritis affecting joints not directly subject to strain as a
result of the service incurred amputation will not be granted service
connection. This will generally require separate evaluation of the
arthritis in the joints directly subject to strain. Amputation, or
injury to an upper extremity, is not considered as a causative factor
with subsequently developing arthritis, except in joints subject to
direct strain or actually injured.
DA 05-1746

June 24, 2005

**WRC-07 ADVISORY COMMITTEE**

**MEETINGS OF THE INFORMAL WORKING GROUPS**

**IB Docket No. 04-286**

The Informal Working Groups (IWGs) of the Advisory Committee for the
2007 World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-07 Advisory Committee)
have scheduled meetings as set forth in the following table. All
meetings will be held in the Washington, D.C. area and are open to the
public.

The Commission's WRC-07 worldwide web site (http://www.fcc.gov/wrc-07)
contains the latest updated information on all scheduled meetings and
Advisory Committee matters. Documents of the WRC-07 Advisory Committee
and IWGs will also generally be available for public inspection and
photocopying at the FCC's Reference Information Center on the Court Yard
Level (Room CY-A257), 445 12^th^ Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.
(telephone: 202-418-0270, TTY: 202-418-4555). In addition, copies of the
documents can be purchased through the FCC's duplication contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554; Telephone (202) 488-5300; Fax (202)
488-5563; TTY (202) 488-5562. Best Copy and Printing, Inc. may be
reached by e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com or via BCPI's web site at:
**www.bcpiweb.com**

For further information on the attached meeting schedule, contact Donald
Weiland of the International Bureau's Strategic Analysis and
Negotiations Division (telephone: 202-418-2220).

**WRC-07 ADVISORY COMMITTEE**

**SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS OF THE INFORMAL WORKING GROUPS**

**Informal Working Group 1: Terrestrial and Space Science Services**

Contacts: Chair -- Jennifer Warren, Telephone: 703-413-5970

Vice-chair -- Kathryn Martin, 202-772-4166

FCC Officials -- Dante Ibarra, Telephone: 202-418-0610

Allen Yang, Telephone: 202-418-0738

Two meetings scheduled:

Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2005

Time: 2:00 pm -- 4:00 pm

Location: 1550 Crystal Drive, Suite 300

Lockheed Martin Corporation

Arlington, VA

Date: Thursday, September 8, 2005 (previously announced)

Time: 2:00 pm -- 4:00 pm

Location: 445 12^th^ Street, S.W., 6^th^ Floor South Conference Room
(6-B516)

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, DC

**- FCC -**
**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION**

![](media/image1.png){width="0.84375in" height="0.84375in"}**ENFORCEMENT
BUREAU**

South Central Region

**Miami Office**

2210 NW 82^nd^ Avenue

Miami, FL 33122

February 22, 2007

David F. Damerau

NationStorage, Inc.

812 NW 1st Street

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311

**NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION**

Case Number: EB-06-MA-028

Document Number: W20073260005

On December 28, 2006, the Commission's Miami Office of the Enforcement
Bureau ("Miami Office") warned you in writing about the unauthorized
operation of a radio station on 99.5 MHz from Nation Storage, 812 NW
1^st^ Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311. According to property records,
NationStorage, Inc. is the owner of this property. On January 24, 2007,
agents from the Miami Office observed that the unlicensed broadcast
radio station on 99.5 MHz continues to operate from Nation Storage, 812
NW 1^st^ Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311. The Commission's records
show that no license was issued for operation of a broadcast station on
99.5 MHz at this location in Fort Lauderdale, FL.

Radio stations must be licensed by the FCC pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 301.
The only exception to this licensing requirement is for certain
transmitters using or operating at a power level or mode of operation
that complies with the standards established in Part 15 of the
Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§  15.1 *et seq*. The field strength of
the signal on frequency 99.5 MHz was measured at 134,840 µV/m at 161
meters, which exceeded the maximum permitted level of 250 microvolts per
meter (µV/m) at 3 meters for non-licensed devices. Thus, this station is
operating in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 301.

You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment
without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of
the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe
penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines,
*in rem* arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and
criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (*see* 47 U.S.C. §§ 401, 501,
503 and 510).

**UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THIS RADIO STATION MUST BE DISCONTINUED
IMMEDIATELY**.

**You have ten (10) days from the date of this notice to respond with
any evidence that you have authority to operate granted by the FCC or
with the names of your tenants or other individuals who are operating an
unlicensed radio station from your property and the steps, if any, you
have taken to prevent such unlicensed activity.** Your response should
be sent to the address in the letterhead and reference the listed case
and document number. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. §
552a(e)(3), we are informing you that the Commission's staff will use
all relevant material information before it to determine what
enforcement action is required to ensure your compliance with FCC Rules.
This will include any information that you disclose in your reply.

You may contact this office if you have any questions.

Gerardo Daubar

Resident Agent

Miami Office

Attachments:

Excerpts from the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended

Enforcement Bureau, \"Inspection Fact Sheet\", July 2003
![](media/image1.jpeg){width="1.6152777777777778in"
height="0.9208333333333333in"}

**Summer Buffet Tips for People with Diabetes**

Barbecues, picnics, and family reunions are gatherings to enjoy and
treasure. If you have diabetes, these events can pose special
challenges. How can you stick with your meal plan, yet join in the
celebration and have some fun? You can do it. If you choose wisely and
watch how much you eat, you can have a delicious meal and feel good too.
So, grab your plate and head for the buffet table.

Choose the high fiber, low-fat dishes instead of fried, high-fat, high
calorie foods. Great choices are beans, peas and lentils, and dark green
vegetables such as broccoli, cabbage, spinach and kale. Go for the green
bean, three-bean, black bean and black-eyed pea dishes or pasta salads
mixed with summer vegetables. Choose whole grain foods such as brown
rice, couscous, whole wheat bread and pasta. Everyone benefits from
eating these foods, not just people with diabetes.

Watch out for high-fat dishes loaded with mayonnaise, sour cream and
butter. Choose veggies that are light on salad dressing, cheese or cream
sauce. If you can, make your own dressing with a little olive oil and
vinegar. Vegetables and grains should fill up a major portion of your
plate, but leave room for some lean meat, poultry or fish. Be sure to
choose grilled chicken and remove the skin\-- instead of the fried
variety. If you\'re going to make a sandwich, use whole wheat bread with
mustard or salsa, rather than mayonnaise.

What\'s for dessert? Summer means terrific fruits. It\'s hard to beat a
fresh peach, fruit salad, cantaloupe, or watermelon. Fruit is an
excellent source of fiber, vitamins and minerals, and has zero fat.
Everyone, including people with diabetes, should eat three to four
servings of fruit a day. Pies, cakes and cookies are high in fat and
cholesterol. If you can\'t resist, have a small serving.

It's best to drink water, unsweetened tea, or diet soda. Add a wedge of
lemon for flavor. If you choose to drink alcoholic beverages, limit your
intake to no more than one drink a day for women, two for men, and drink
only with a meal. Eating the right foods to control your blood sugar
means being prepared and planning ahead. If you need help putting
together a meal plan, ask your health care provider to refer you to a
dietitian or diabetes educator. For more information about controlling
your diabetes, call the National Diabetes Education Program at
1-800-438-5383 or visit the Program's website at
[http://ndep.nih.gov](http://ndep.nih.gov/).

> ![](media/image2.jpeg){width="0.8215277777777777in" height="1.375in"}

Sponsored by the National Diabetes Education Program

> A joint Program of the National Institutes of Health and the Centers
> for
>
> Disease for Control Prevention
>
> [http://ndep.nih.gov](http://ndep.nih.gov/) or
> <http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes>
![](media/image1.png){width="2.1333333333333333in"
height="0.7909722222222222in"}

Building 460

P.O. Box 5000

Upton, NY 11973-5000

Phone 631 344-8628

Fax 631 344-5803

brog@bnl.gov

managed by Brookhaven Science Associates\
for the U.S. Department of Energy

*date: January 28, 2003*

*to: Distribution*

*from: Ken Brog, Steward, Integrated Assessment Program*

*subject: Integrated Assessment Subject Area - Revised Required
Assessments Table*

On January 15^th^, the SBMS Steering Committee approved revisions to the
Required Assessments Table in the Integrated Assessment Subject Area.
These changes will be published on SBMS in the very near future. The
changes are driven by the need to strengthen the Laboratory's Assessment
Program, specifically at the Management System level.

It is expected that line organizations will have questions and concerns
about the content of the new Required Assessments Table. MS Stewards are
expected to assist line organizations in understanding and completing
the assessment activities in support of the goals of the Management
Systems.

The revision to the IAP Subject Area will be discussed at the next
Quality Representatives meeting (February 5^th^ -- ESH Coordinators have
also been invited) and the next Management Council meeting (February
18).

Distribution:

P. Paul T. Sheridan W. Hempfling P. Bond M. Bebon

M. Lynch L. Hill B. Sack

cc:

K. Barkigia M. Bogosian R. Costa K. Fox M. Healey

S. Hoey S. Layendecker R. Lebel F. Marotta T. Maugeri

S. McKeon T. Monahan B. Murfin M. Petersen D. Ports

T. Powers R. Reaver L. Sbarra B. Schwaner M. Sebastiano

J. Swenson K. White O. White B. Zimmerman