**FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE**

**ANNOUNCEMENT OF**

**FUNDING OPPORTUNITY**

![](media/image1.png){width="1.375in" height="1.375in"}

**Advanced Diagnostics And Imaging**

**DE-PS26-04NT42072**

**CFDA Number:**

**CONTACT: Dona Sheehan, Contract Specialist**

**TELEPHONE NO.: 412/386-5918**

**FAX NO.:**

**E-MAIL: sheehan@netl.doe.gov**

**ISSUING OFFICE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY**

**ISSUE DATE: February 23, 2004**

**DUE DATE: April 12, 2004**

Information regarding this solicitation is available on the Department
of Energy, Industry Interactive Procurement System (IIPS) web site at:
[http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/)

**[SECTION I]{.underline}**

**[FUNDING OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION]{.underline}**

**1.1 [SUMMARY ]{.underline}**

The primary mission of the Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy
Technology Laboratory (NETL) through this cost-shared Advanced
Diagnostics and Imaging Systems (ADIS) funding opportunity notice is to
develop advanced diagnostic tools and technologies that will provide
higher resolution and more precise rock and fluid properties for
reservoir targets in U.S. basins, providing a more cost-effective, and
reliable supply of natural gas to meet demands in new and expanded
market regions. The purpose of the proposed funding opportunity notice
is to develop new technologies to reduce risk in exploration and
development of deeper gas and tight fractured reservoirs.

**1.2 [BACKGROUND INFORMATION ]{.underline}**

The goal of the U.S. Department of Energy, Fossil Energy's Natural Gas
Technologies Program is to provide the technologies that will assure
abundant, reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound supplies of
natural gas. Forecasts by the Energy Information Administration project
that natural gas demand in the U.S. will grow by 50 percent by 2025
(Annual Energy Outlook 2003). The recent study by the National Petroleum
Council ***Balancing Natural Gas Policy -- Fueling the Demands of a
Growing Economy*** concludes that adding new North American natural gas
supplies will require finding, developing, and producing more
technologically-challenging resources than ever before. The study states
that the natural gas resources that remain to be found and developed
over the next 25 years can be described as deeper, hotter, tighter, more
remote, smaller, harder-to-find, and in deeper water.

The "***Advanced Diagnostics and Imaging Solicitation***" supports the
goal of the Natural Gas Technologies Program by developing
government-industry (including academia) partnerships to develop new
tools and technologies that will reduce the costs of finding these
technologically-challenging resources.

In a recent news release, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals
Management Service increased its estimate of probable recoverable gas
located in the shallow water Gulf of Mexico by 175 percent. They
currently estimate that there is 55 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas at
15,000 feet and deeper below the outer continental shelf in water depths
up to 650 feet.

Onshore U.S. deep gas resources are even more abundant. Estimates by the
USGS indicate that deep gas reservoirs will supply 135 Tcf of
technically recoverable gas. In a recent assessment of marginal,
sub-economic resources in the Greater Green River and Wind River Basins
of the Rocky Mountains, the National Energy Technology Laboratory
estimated that over 1,000 Tcf of in-place gas exists below 15,000 feet,
mainly in tight gas sands.

**1.3 [OBJECTIVES ]{.underline}**

**[Objective]{.underline}**

The objective of this funding opportunity is to receive applications for
cost-shared research projects that will develop new exploration tools
and technologies that will allow industry to obtain better spatial data
for quantification of reservoir volumes at depths greater than 15,000
feet and in tight fractured reservoirs. Advances in acquisition,
processing and imaging that provide more precise reservoir properties
are required to develop these resources in deep and tight gas plays.
Such advances in diagnostic and imaging technologies will lead to new
field discoveries and to improved development strategies for optimizing
production in existing fields.

**[Scope]{.underline}**

It is anticipated that two rounds will be offered through this
solicitation to receive proposals. However, the decision on Round 2 will
be based upon the number of projects selected and awarded under Round 1,
the amount of DOE funding requested for these projects, and the
availability of funding in Fiscal Year 2005 for the Advanced Diagnostics
and Imaging subprogram under the Natural Gas Technologies
Program.[Round]{.underline} 1 *Deep Gas Imaging and Diagnostics*To
achieve the projectprogram objectives, the DOE/NETL, through the
Strategic Center for Natural Gas, is requesting applications for
Advanced Diagnostics and Imaging tools and technologies. under the
following technical topic areas: Technological advances are needed to
obtain better images of reservoir targets and more precise measurement
of critical reservoir properties. Regionally, the solicitation is
targeting the shallow water/deep gas plays of the Gulf of Mexico and
deep portions of interior basins in the U.S at depths greater than
15,000 feet (Round 1)and tight fractured reservoirs in interior basins
of the U.S. (Round 2). These interior basins include, but are not
limited to, the Greater Green River, Wind River, Anadarko, Appalachian
and Uinta basins.

NOTE: It is the intention of the DOE NETL to put a priority on the
development of the deep gas potential in shallow water areas of the Gulf
of Mexico (GOM), and the deep portions of the interior basins in
Round 1. It is the DOE NETL\'s intention to open a second round
targeting the low permeability gas bearing formations of the interior U.
S. basins, at any depth, if sufficient funding becomes available.
Technology to develop either of these resources will rely on methods to
achieve higher resolution of relatively thin gas bearing formations at
depth. Emphasis is placed on the large gas potential in the deep GOM and
the deep interior basins because of the potential to develop a large
volume of gas resources in an area with significant infrastructure as a
first priority effort. The decision on Round 2 will be based upon the
number of projects selected and awarded under Round 1, the amount of DOE
funding requested for these projects, and the availability of funding in
Fiscal Year 2005 for the Advanced Diagnostics and Imaging subprogram
under the Natural Gas Technologies Program.

**Round I -- DEEP GAS IN SHALLOW WATER GULF OF MEXICO AND DEEP INTERIOR
BASINS OF THE U.S.** **(DEPTH \> 15,000 FEET).**

Applications may address one or a combination of the three interrelated
subjects.

**Subtopic 1 -- TOOLS**

We are seeking aAdvances are sought in seismic and borehole geophysical
technologies, including higher resolution seismic data acquisition and
processing technologies, and advances in Vertical Seismic Profiling
(VSP) and single well seismic sources, receivers, and data transmission
systems. These tools , which will allow forenable more reliable imaging
of deep gas reservoirs. Down-hole tools must be capable of withstanding
350 degrees F and 15,000 psi and be designed to perform reliably in deep
wells.

We are also seekAdvances in multi-component and S-Wave acquisition,
technologies that combine electromagnetic and seismic data, and down
hole acoustic and electrical logging and imaging tools are of particular
interest

.

Innovative new instrumentation for direct detection of natural gas in
deep reservoirs, and methodologies for improved estimation of gas
saturations from geophysical data are also sought.

Other areas of interest include advances in seismic while drilling, pore
pressure prediction ahead of the drill bit, and fluid type prediction
technologies.

Research and development projects require 20% minimum cost share.

**Subtopic 2 -- DATA PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION**

We are also looking for iInnovative data processing, interpretation, and
visualization technologies are sought to produce higher resolution
images of gas-bearing formations at depths greater than 15,000 feet.
Techniques to better utilize existing data or to improve data
acquisition strategies are of interest. Enhanced methods of processing
data (e.g., advances in multi-component data analysis and full wave
inversion applications) during acquisition and post survey, and
analytical advances for the processed imagery that will lower costs and
make the technology applicable to a larger resource target in the US are
also sought.

Development of innovative processing technologies requires a 20% minimum
cost share.

**Subtopic 3 -- APPLIED TECHNOLOGY**

The request will also include pApplications to apply geophysical,
geological, geochemical, and well logging technologies to deep
reservoirs in conjunction with industry will also be considered. Applied
studies or demonstrations will require a 50% cost share.

**Round II -- TIGHT FRACTURED RESERVOIRS IN INTERIOR BASINS OF THE
U.S.**

Applications may address one or a combination of the three interrelated
subjects.

**Subtopic 1 -- TOOLS**

We are seeking aAdvances are sought in seismic and borehole geophysical
technologies, including higher resolution seismic data acquisition and
processing technologies, and advances in Vertical Seismic Profiling
(VSP) and single well seismic sources, receivers, and data transmission
systems. These tools , which will allow forenable more reliable imaging
of tight gas reservoirs. Down-hole tools must be capable of quantifying
thin, fractured, low permeability reservoirs in the basins of the US.

We are also seekAdvances in multi-component and S-Wave acquisition,
technologies that combine electromagnetic and seismic data, and down
hole acoustic and electrical logging and imaging tools are of particular
interest.

Innovative new instrumentation for direct detection of natural gas in
deep reservoirs, and methodologies for improved estimation of gas
saturations from geophysical data are also sought.

Other areas of interest include advances in seismic while drilling, pore
pressure prediction ahead of the drill bit, and fluid type prediction
technologies.

Research and development projects require 20% minimum cost share.

**Subtopic 2 - Subtopic 2 -- DATA PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION**

We are also looking for iInnovative data processing, interpretation, and
visualization technologies are sought to produce higher resolution
images of gas-bearing formations at a higher resolution than current
available to identify thinner formation pays. Techniques to better
utilize existing data or to improve data acquisition strategies are of
interest. Enhanced methods of processing data (e.g., advances in
multi-component data analysis and full wave inversion applications)
during acquisition and post survey, and analytical advances for the
processed imagery that will lower costs and make the technology
applicable to a larger resource target in the US are also sought.

Development of innovative processing technologies requires a 20% minimum
cost share.

**Subtopic 3 -- APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES**

The request will also include pApplications to apply geophysical,
geological, geochemical, and well logging technologies to deep
reservoirs in conjunction with industry will also be considered. Applied
studies or demonstrations will require a 50% cost share.

**[SECTION II]{.underline}**

**[SOLICITATION INFORMATION]{.underline}**

[**Round I -- DEEP GAS IN SHALLOW WATER GULF OF MEXICO** **AND DEEP
INTERIOR BASINS IN THE U.S. (DEPTHS \> 15,000 FEET).**]{.underline}

**2.1 [TYPE OF AWARD INSTRUMENT - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

DOE anticipates awarding cooperative agreements under this Program
Announcement. A Statement of Substantial Involvement article will be
negotiated with each successful applicant prior to award.

**2.2 [ESTIMATED FUNDING (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Approximately \$1,500,000 in FY 2004 of DOE funding is expected to be
available for new awards under Round 1 of this announcement. Out year
funding is contingent on availability of funds.

**2.3 [MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM AWARD SIZE (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Ceiling (i.e., the estimated maximum amount for an individual award made
under Round 1): \$1,200,000 (DOE funding)

Floor (i.e., the minimum estimated amount for an individual award made
under this Round 1): \$150,000 (DOE funding)

**2.4 [EXPECTED NUMBER OF AWARDS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

DOE anticipates making approximately 2 to 4 awards under this
announcement for Round 1. However, the Government reserves the right to
fund, in whole or in part, any, all, or none of the applications
submitted in response to this announcement and will award that number of
financial assistance instruments which serves the public purpose and is
in the best interest of the Government.

**2.5 [PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

The government anticipates the project period for the subject awards to
be no less than one year and no more than three years. Awards will have
project and budget periods that are specific to the project and funding.

**[Round II -- TIGHT FRACTURED RESERVOIRS IN INTERIOR BASINS OF THE
UNITED STATES]{.underline}**

It is the intention of the DOE NETL to put a priority on the development
of the deep gas potential in shallow water areas of the Gulf of Mexico
(GOM) and deep interior basins in Round 1. It is the DOE NETL\'s
intention to open a second round in the low permeability gas bearing
formations of the interior basins in the U.S. **[if]{.underline}**
sufficient funding becomes available. No other information is available
for Round 2 at this time. It is anticipated that notification of the
DOE's intent to proceed with Round 2 will be available on the DOE/NETL
website sometime during the last quarter of FY 2004 or the first or
second quarter of FY05 of at the following address:

[www.netl.doe.gov/business/solicit/index.html](http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/solicit/index.html)

**[SECTION III]{.underline}**

**[SOLICITATIONELIGIBILITY INFORMATION]{.underline}**

**3.1 [ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

All types of applicants are eligible to apply, except other Federal
agencies, Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs),
and nonprofit organizations described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that engage in lobbying activities.

**3.2 [NOTICE REGARDING ELIGIBILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 501(C)(4) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Applicant organizations that are described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and that have engaged in any lobbying
activities after December 31, 1995 are not eligible for an award. As set
forth in section 3 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended,
(2 U.S.C. 1602), lobbying activities are defined broadly to include,
among other things, contacts on behalf of an organization with specified
employees of the Executive Branch and Congress with regard to Federal
legislative, regulatory, and program administrative matters.

**3.3 [COST SHARING OR MATCHING - EPACT (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

The cost share must be at least 20% of the total allowable costs for
research and development projects and 50% of the total allowable costs
for field testing or demonstration and commercial application projects
(i.e., the sum of the recipient\'s allowable costs and the Federal share
equals the total allowable cost of the project) and must come from
non-Federal sources. (See 10 CFR Part 600 for the applicable cost
sharing requirements.)

**3.4 [ENERGY POLICY ACT ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

Section 2306 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPACT) \[42 U.S.C.
13525\] imposes certain eligibility requirements on awards made under
this program. In order to make an award to an applicant that is a
business entity, other than a non-profit organization of the type
described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, DOE
must determine that the applicant\'s participation will be in the
economic interest of the United States and that the applicant is either
a U.S. owned company or is incorporated or organized under the laws of
any State and that its parent company is incorporated or organized under
the laws of a country that affords: (1) to U.S. owned companies
opportunities comparable to those afforded to any other company to
participate in government-supported joint ventures in energy research
and development and in local investment opportunities; and (2) adequate
and effective protection for intellectual property rights of the U. S.
owned companies. Eligible applicants must be able to meet these two
tests.

**3.5 [FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS (FFRDC) (JAN
2004)]{.underline}**

FFRDC applicants are not eligible for an award. A list of the FFRDC\'s
is available at http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/ffrdc/start.htm. However, an
application that includes performance of a portion of the work by a
FFRDC will be evaluated and may be considered for award.

**3.6 [PARTICIPATION BY FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
CONTRACTORS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) contractors are
not eligible for an award under this announcement, but they may be
proposed as a team member subject to the following guidelines:

AUTHORIZATION FOR NON-DOE FFRDCS

The Federal agency sponsoring the FFRDC must authorize in writing the
use of the FFRDC contractor on the proposed project and this
authorization must be submitted with the application. The use of a FFRDC
contractor must be consistent with the contractor\'s authority under its
award and must not place the FFRDC in direct competition with the
private sector.

AUTHORIZATION FOR DOE FFRDCS

The cognizant contracting officer must authorize in writing the use of a
DOE FFRDC contractor on the proposed project and this authorization must
be submitted with the application. The following wording is acceptable
for this authorization.

"Authorization is granted for the \[ \] Laboratory to participate in the
proposed project.

The work proposed for the laboratory is consistent with or complimentary
to the

missions of the laboratory, will not adversely impact execution of the
DOE assigned

programs at the laboratory, and will not place the laboratory in direct
competition

with the domestic private sector."

VALUE/FUNDING

The value of and funding for the FFRDC portion of the work will not
normally be included in the award to a successful applicant. Usually,
DOE will fund a DOE FFRDC contractor through the DOE field work proposal
system and other FFRDC entities through an interagency agreement with
the sponsoring agency.

COST SHARE

The applicant\'s cost share requirement will be based on the total cost
of the project, including the applicant\'s and the FFRDC contractor\'s
portions of the effort.

FFRDC CONTRACTOR EFFORT

The FFRDC effort, in aggregate, shall not exceed 25% of the total
estimated cost of the project, including the applicant\'s and the FFRDC
contractor\'s portions of the effort.

RESPONSIBILITY

The applicant, if successful, will be the responsible authority
regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and
administrative issues, including but not limited to disputes and claims,
arising out of any agreement between the applicant and the FFRDC
contractor.

**3.7 [PERFORMANCE OF WORK IN THE UNITED STATES (FEB
2001)]{.underline}**

As a condition of award under this solicitation, applicants must agree
that at least 75% of the direct labor cost for the project (including
subcontractor labor) will be incurred in the United States unless the
applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the DOE that the United
States economic interest will be better served through a greater
percentage of work performed outside the United States. For example, an
Applicant may provide evidence that expertise to develop a technology
exists only outside the United States, but that ultimate
commercialization of the technology will result in substantial benefits
to the United States such as improved electricity reliability, increased
employment, increased exports of U.S.-manufactured products, etc.

**[SECTION IV]{.underline}**

**[SOLICITATION APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION]{.underline}**

**4.1 [ADDRESS TO REQUEST APPLICATION PACKAGE (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

This announcement includes all the information needed to complete an
application.

**4.2 [DUNS NUMBER (NOV 2003)]{.underline}**

All applicants, except individuals who would personally receive an award
under this announcement apart from any business or non-profit
organization they may operate, must include a Dun and Bradstreet (D&B)
Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in their application. For
the purpose of this requirement, the applicant is the entity that meets
the eligibility criteria and has the legal authority to apply for an
award. For example, a consortium formed to apply for an award must
obtain a DUNS number for that consortium. For assistance in obtaining a
DUNS number at no cost to you, call the DUNS Number request line at 1
866-705-5711. Be prepared to provide the following information: (1)
Organization name; (2) Address; (3) Telephone number; (4) Line of
business; (5) Chief executive officer/key manager; (6) Date the
organization was started; (7) Number of people employed; (8)
Organization affiliation. If you do not already have a DUNS number, you
should obtain one as soon as you decide to submit an application.

**4.3 [PRE-APPLICATION - NOT REQUIRED (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Pre-applications are not required.

**4.4 [PROGRAM AREA OF INTEREST (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

This funding opportunity notice contains one program area of interest
for Round 1[, Deep Gas in Shallow Water Gulf of Mexico and Deep Interior
Basins in the U.S.]{.underline}, and one program area of interest for
Round 2, [Tight Fractured Reservoirs in Interior Basins of the
U.S.]{.underline}; however applications are only being accepted for
Round 1at this time. It is anticipated that notification of the DOE's
intent to proceed with Round 2 will be available on the DOE/NETL website
sometime during the first or second quarter of FY05.

**4.5 [APPLICATION (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

Applicants must include the following files in their E-Application (See
Section IV, "Other Submission Requirements" for instructions on how to
submit your E-Application)

For consistency, the applicant is instructed to use the file names
specified below. Filename extensions shall clearly indicate the software
application used for preparation of the documents (i.e., "xxx.doc" for
Word files or "xxx.pdf" for Adobe Acrobat files).

[MANDATORY FILES]{.underline} [FILENAME]{.underline}

Application APPLICATION.\-\--

Budget BUDGET.\-\--

Budget Justification BUDGET JUSTIFICATION.\-\--

Project Summary/Abstract PROJECT SUMMARY.\-\--

Project Narrative PROJECT NARRATIVE.\-\--

Certifications/Assurances/Representations CERTIFICATIONS.\-\--

ADDITIONAL FILES

Attachment 1 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH BIO ATTACHMENTS.\-\--

Attachment 2 COMMITMENT LETTERS CLTP ATTACHMENT.pdf

Attachment 3 FFRDC ATTACHMENT FFRDC.pdf

**4.6 [APPLICATION FILE (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

Applicants must complete a SF 424 application form. Save this form as a
Word or PDF file, named \"APPLICATION.xxx.\" The SF 424, is available on
the NETL homepage at:

http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/faapiaf/app-files.html

**4.7 [BUDGET FILE (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

Applicants must complete a separate DOE F 4600.4 for each year of
support requested and a cumulative budget for the total project period.
The DOE F 4600.4 is available on the NETL homepage at:

http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/faapiaf/app-files.html

You may request funds under any of the categories listed as long as the
item and amount are necessary to perform the proposed work and are not
precluded by the cost principles or program funding restrictions (See
Section IV). Save these budget forms in a single Word or PDF file, named
\"BUDGET.xxx.\"

**4.8 [BUDGET JUSTIFICATION FILE (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

Justify proposed direct labor, travel, consultants, large subawards,
large or unique \"other direct costs\", equipment, etc. For subawards,
identify organization name, description of the scope of work, name of
the project leader, and estimated total costs. The contracting officer
may request a more detailed budget for a particular subaward, if your
application is selected. Provide an explanation of the source, nature,
amount and availability of any proposed cost sharing. Save this
information in a Word or PDF file, named \"BUDGET JUSTIFICATION.xxx\".

The following budget detail is required. Failure to provide the detailed
cost information as described in the instructions will result in an
incomplete application. If a minimum cost share is required by this
funding opportunity announcement, the applicant shall stipulate in the
application the source and amount of cost sharing and the value of third
party in-kind contributions proposed to meet the requirement.
Additionally teaming members and subcontractors are also required to
submit the below information with their budgets.

PERSONNEL \-- In support of the proposed personnel costs, provide a
supplemental

schedule that identifies the labor hours, labor rates, and cost by labor
classification for

each budget year. Also indicate the basis of the labor classification,
number of hours,

and labor rates. An example of the basis for the labor classification
and number of hours

could be past experience, engineering estimate, etc. An example of the
basis for the

labor rates could be actual rates for the individuals who will perform
the work or an

average labor rate for the labor classification or a departmental
average rate.

FRINGE BENEFITS \-- Provide the method used to calculate the proposed
rate amount.

If a fringe benefit has been negotiated with, or approved by, a Federal
Government

agency, provide a copy of the agreement. If no rate agreement exists,
provide a detailed

list of the fringe benefit expenses (e.g., payroll taxes, insurances,
holiday and

vacation pay, bonuses) and their associated costs. Identify the base for
allocating

these fringe benefit expenses.

Travel \-- For each proposed trip, provide the purpose, number of
travelers, travel

origin and destination, number of days, and a breakdown of costs for
airfare, lodging,

meals, car rental, and incidentals. The basis for the airfare, lodging,
meals, car

rental, and incidentals must be provided, such as past trips, current
quotations, Federal

Travel Regulations, etc.

EQUIPMENT \-- Provide an itemized list of each piece of equipment, its
unit costs, and

the basis for estimating the cost, for example, vendor quotes, catalog
prices, prior invoices,

etc.

SUPPLIES \-- Provide an itemized list of supplies; identify the quantity
of each item,

its unit cost, and the basis for estimating the cost, for example,
vendor quotes, catalog

prices, prior invoices, etc.

CONTRACTUAL

Consultants \-- Provide the hourly or daily rate along with the basis
for the rate.

Furnish resumes or similar information regarding qualifications or
experience.

Provide at least two invoices reflecting hourly or daily rates charged
to customers

other than the Government. A statement signed by the consultant
certifying his

or her availability and salary must be provided. If travel or incidental
expenses

are to be charged, give the basis for these costs.

Subcontractors \-- Identify each planned subcontractor and its total
proposed

budget. Each subcontractor\'s budget and supporting detail should be
included as

part of the Applicant\'s budget narrative. In addition, the Applicant
shall

provide the following information for each planned subcontract: a brief
description

of the work to be subcontracted; the number of quotes solicited and
received; the

cost or price analysis performed by the Applicant; names and addresses

of the subcontractors tentatively selected and the basis for their
selection; i.e. low

bidder, delivery schedule, technical competence; type of contract and
estimated

cost and fee or profit; and, affiliation with the Applicant, if any.

CONSTRUCTION \-- Provide detail of construction costs, if applicable.

OTHER DIRECT COSTS \-- Provide an itemized list with costs for any

other item proposed as a direct cost and state the basis for each
proposed item.

INDIRECT COSTS \-- If indirect rates have been negotiated with or
approved by a

Federal Government agency, please provide a copy of the latest rate
agreement. If you

do not have a current rate agreement, submit an indirect cost rate
proposal which

includes the major base and pool expense groupings by line item and
dollar

amount. In either case, provide a breakdown of the proposed indirect
costs for each

of your accounting periods included in the application. Identify the
rate and allocation base

for each indirect cost, such as Overhead, General and Administrative,
Facilities Capital

Cost of Money, etc.

COST SHARING \-- Identify the percentage level and source of cost
sharing for the

proposed project. Firm funding commitments are expected and
documentation

of those commitments must be included in the application. Additionally,
the impact of

DOE\'s cost share to the viability of the project must be addressed, to
include justification

for the need for Federal Funds.

NOTE: The total project cost (i.e. sum of Applicant and other
participants plus DOE cost shares) must be reflected in each budget
form.

A detailed estimate of the cash value (basis of and the nature, e.g.,
equipment, labor, facilities, cash, etc.) of all contributions to the
project by each participant must be provided. Note that \"cost-sharing\"
is not limited to cash investment. In-kind contributions (e.g.,
contribution of services or property; donated equipment, buildings, or
land; donated supplies; or unrecovered indirect costs) incurred as part
of the project may be considered as all or part of the cost share. The
\"cost-sharing\" definition is contained in 10 CFR 600.30, 600.101,
600.123, 600.224, 600.302, 600. 313 and OMB Circular A-110.

Fee or profit will not be paid to the recipients of financial assistance
awards. Additionally, foregone fee or profit by the Applicant shall not
be considered cost sharing under any resulting award. Reimbursement of
actual costs will only include those costs that are allowable and
allocable to the project as determined in accordance with the applicable
cost principles prescribed in 10 CFR 600.127, 10 CFR 600.312 or 10 CFR
600.318.

**4.9 [PROJECT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

The project summary/abstract must contain a summary of the proposed
activity suitable for publication. It should be a self-contained
document that identifies the name of the applicant, the principal
investigator/project director, the project title, the objectives of the
project, methods to be employed, the potential impact of the project
(i.e., benefits, out comes), and participants (for collaborative
projects). It should be informative to other persons working in the same
or related fields and, insofar as possible, understandable to a
scientifically or technically literate lay reader. This document must
not include any proprietary or sensitive business information as the
Department may make it available to the public. The project summary
abstract must not exceed 1 page when printed using standard 8.5\" by 11
paper with 1\" margins (top, bottom, left and right). The format for
submission of this Project Summary can be found at
http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/faapiaf/app-files.html. Save this
information in a Word file, named \"PROJECT SUMMARY.\"

**4.10 [PROJECT NARRATIVE FILE (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

This file shall include a cover page indicating the funding opportunity
notice number, name and address of the Applicant, point of contact,
telephone/FAX number/E-Mail address, title of project, and date of
application.

The project narrative file must be formatted to separately address each
of the sections listed below. It is requested that the project narrative
not exceed **twenty five (25) pages** (excluding the cover page, table
of contents, Statement of Project Objectives, resumes and commitment
letters), double spaced, 1\" margins (top, bottom, left, right), and
when printed will fit on size 8 1/2\" by 11\" paper. The type must be
legible and not smaller than 11 point. Evaluators will review only the
number of pages specified.

Save this information in a Word or PDF file named \"PROJECT
NARRATIVE.xxx\"

Unnecessarily elaborate applications are not desired. Elaborate art
work, graphics and pictures will increase the document file size. If the
project narrative file size is over 5MB, we request that you use a
\"Zip\" file compression software, such as WinZip software, to reduce
the time needed to download the file.

This file should provide a clear description of the work to be
undertaken and how you plan to accomplish it. It must be formatted to
address each of the merit review criterion and sub-criterion listed in
Section V. Provide sufficient information so that the reviewers will be
able to evaluate the application in accordance with these merit review
criteria.

DOE WILL EVALUATE AND CONSIDER ONLY THOSE APPLICATIONS THAT ADDRESS
SEPARATELY EACH OF THE MERIT REVIEW CRITERION AND SUB-CRITERION.

The project narrative will consist of the Applicant's outline addressing
the technical and management aspects of the assistance action, the
Applicant's capabilities and what the Applicant will do to satisfy the
requirements of the funding opportunity announcement. Since the
technical information contained in this section will be evaluated to
determine such matters as understanding of the work to be performed,
technical approach, and potential for completing the desired work, it
should be specific and complete in every detail. The project narrative
should be practical and be prepared simply and economically, providing a
straightforward, concise delineation of what it is the Applicant will do
to satisfy the requirements of the funding opportunity announcement.

To help facilitate the review process and to insure addressing all the
review criteria, the applicant shall use the following format when
preparing the project narrative.

**[COVER PAGE]{.underline} \[Excluded from the project narrative page
limitation of twenty five (25) pages\]**

**[TABLE OF CONTENTS]{.underline} \[Excluded from the project narrative
page limitation of twenty five (25) pages\]**

**[PROJECT NARRATIVE]{.underline} \[Twenty five (25) page limitation\]**

**[Scientific and Technical Merit]{.underline}**

In this section the applicant should provide detailed information that
will allow DOE reviewers to score the application based on Criterion 1
identified in Section 5.2. Specifically, the applicant should discuss
how the proposed technology will achieve the research objectives of the
solicitation, provide a thorough technical discussion on the scientific
and engineering principles of the technology, discuss the current state
of knowledge and show how the proposed technology represents an
important advancement over the current technology and why such an
advancement is needed, and discuss and, (where applicable) provide
quantitative data on the benefits of the new technology.

The applicant should provide a thorough discussion of the significance
of the proposed technology to the gas industry and the U.S. This should
include a discussion of the extent to which industry will adopt and use
the technology over existing or lower-cost technology, how the
technology will either reduce exploration and finding costs or increase
the success of exploration and finding, and how the technology will help
to decrease the cost of gas supply, improve environmental performance
and acceptability.

The applicant should also provide information on the likelihood of the
success of the project, including information on the scientific and
engineering challenges to developing the new technology, how the
proposed work will overcome these challenges, and the likelihood that
the proposed technology will lead to a scientific or technical
breakthrough.

**[Technical Approach]{.underline}**

In this section the applicant should provide detailed information that
will allow DOE reviewers to score the application based on Criterion 2
identified in Section 5.2. Specifically, the applicant should provide a
thorough and detailed narrative to the Statement of Project Objectives
for the project and discuss what work is being done and why the work is
being done for each task and subtask. The applicant should address how
the technical approach will achieve the stated objective for the
proposed project. Any use of prior research and development and the
extent to which this prior research and development will improve the
likelihood of a successful project should be discussed.

The applicant should provide justification for labor hours and discuss
(briefly) the expertise that the project team provides for successful
completion of each task. The interrelationship of tasks, a project
schedule, and any anticipated problems that could affect project
schedule or milestones should be discussed.

**[Technical and Management Capabilities]{.underline}**

In this section the applicant should provide detailed information that
will allow DOE reviewers to score the application based on Criterion 3
identified in Section 5.2. Specifically, the applicant should provide
detailed credentials, capabilities, and experience (both technical and
managerial) of the organizations and key personnel. Information on
similar projects, including dollar value, and duration, how these
projects relate to the technology being developed, and the success and
products developed under these projects should be discussed. Information
should also be provided on the facilities and equipment needed to
perform the proposed research and whether or not this equipment is
available or needs to be purchased.

**[STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES]{.underline} (SOPO) \[Excluded from
the project narrative page limitation of twenty five (25) pages\]**

The Department of Energy\'s, National Energy Technology Laboratory uses
a specific format for Statement of Project Objectives in its awards. In
announcements such as this one, where the Government does not provide a
Statement of Project Objectives, the Applicant is to provide one, which
the DOE will then use to generate the Statement of Project Objectives to
be included in the award.

The project narrative must contain a single, detailed Statement of
Project Objectives that addresses how the project objectives will be
met. The Statement of Project Objectives must contain a clear, concise
description of all activities to be completed during project performance
and follow the structure discussed below. The Statement of Project
Objectives may be released to the public by DOE in whole or in part at
any time. It is therefore required that it shall not contain proprietary
or confidential business information.

**The Statement of Project Objectives for the proposed research is
limited to ten (10) single spaced pages and is excluded from the project
narrative page limitation of twenty-five (25) pages. Applicants shall
prepare the Statement of Project Objectives in the following format:**

TITLE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED

(Insert the title of work to be performed. Be concise and descriptive.)

A. OBJECTIVES

Include one paragraph on the overall objective(s) of the work. Also,
include objective(s) for each phase of the work.

B. SCOPE OF WORK

This section should not exceed one-half page and should summarize the
effort and approach to achieve the objective(s) of the work for each
Phase.

C. TASKS TO BE PERFORMED

Tasks, concisely written, should be provided in a logical sequence and
should be divided into the phases of the project. This section provides
a brief summary of the planned approach to this project.

PHASE I

Task 1.0 - (Title)

(Description)

Subtask 1.1 (Optional)

(Description)

Task 2.0 - (Title)

PHASE II (Optional)

Task 3.0 - (Title)

D. DELIVERABLES

The periodic, topical, and final reports shall be submitted in
accordance with the attached \"Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist\"
and the instructions accompanying the checklist.

\[Note: The Recipient shall provide a list of deliverables other than
those identified on the \"Federal Assistance Reporting Checklist\" that
will be delivered. These reports shall also be identified within the
text of the Statement of Project Objectives. See the following examples:

1\. Task 1.1 - (Report Description)

2\. Task 2.2 - (Report Description)\]

E. BRIEFINGS/TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS (If applicable)

A project kickoff meeting shall be held within sixty (60) days after
issuance of award. This meeting will be held at the COR's facility
located in Pittsburgh, PA or Morgantown, W.V.

The Recipient shall prepare detailed annual briefings for presentation
to the COR at the COR\'s facility located in Pittsburgh, PA or
Morgantown, WV. Briefings shall be given by the Recipient to explain the
plans, progress, and results of the technical effort.

The Recipient shall provide and present a technical paper(s) at the
DOE/NETL Annual Contractor\'s Review Meeting to be held at the NETL
facility located in Pittsburgh, PA or Morgantown, WV.

The recipient shall provide (via e-mail) informal monthly reports in
accordance with a template to be provided by the COR.

**4.11 [CERTIFICATIONS/ASSURANCES/REPRESENTATIONS FILE (DEC
2003)]{.underline}**

Applicants must complete the DOE
certifications/assurances/representations information. Save this
information in a single Word file named "CERTIFICATIONS-ASSURANCES". The
certifications/assurances/representations are available on the NETL
homepage at:

http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/faapiaf/app-files.html

This program is covered under Title XX through XXIII of the Energy
Policy Act (EPACT) of 1992. If an applicant is a business entity other
than an organization of they type described in 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, the applicant must complete the form set with the
EPACT Representation and provide the appropriate EPACT Representation,
(i.e., EPACT Representation for Awards Under \$100,000 or EPACT
Representation for Awards of \$100,000 or more).

**4.12 [ATTACHMENT 1 - BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**
**\[Excluded from the project narrative page limitation of twenty five
(25) pages\]**

Provide a biographical sketch for the project director/principal
investigator, co-project directors/principal investigators and any other
key personnel associated to this project,. Save this information in a
single Word or PDF file, named \"BIO ATTACHMENT.xxx\". The biographical
information must not exceed 2 pages for each person when printed on
8.5\" by 11\" paper with 1 inch margins (top, bottom, left, and right)
with font not smaller than 11 point and must include:

Education. Undergraduate, graduate and postdoctoral training, provide
institution, major/area,

degree and year.

Positions: Beginning with the current position list, in chronological
order, professional/academic

positions with a brief description.

> Publications. A list of pertinent publications most closely related to
> the proposed project. For each publication, identify the names of all
> authors (in the same sequence in which they appear in the
> publication), the article title, book or journal title, volume number,
> page numbers, year of publication, and website address if available
> electronically.

Patents, copyrights and software systems developed may be provided in
addition to or

substituted for publications.

Synergistic Activities. List no more than 5 professional and scholarly
activities related to

the effort proposed.

**4.13 [ATTACHMENT 2 COMMITMENT LETTERS FROM THIRD PARTIES CONTRIBUTING
TO COST SHARING (OCT 2003)]{.underline} \[Excluded from the project
narrative page limitation of twenty five (25) pages\]**

If a third party, (i.e., a party other than the organization submitting
the application) proposes to provide all or part of the required cost
sharing, the applicant must include a letter from the third party
stating that it is committed to providing a specific minimum dollar
amount of cost sharing. The letter should also identify the proposed
cost sharing (e.g., cash, services, and/or property) to be contributed.
Letters must be signed by the person authorized to commit the
expenditure of funds by the entity and be provided in a PDF format. Save
this information is a file named \"CLTP ATTACHMENT.pdf\".

**4.14 [ATTACHMENT 3 FFRDC ATTACHMENT (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

FFRDC Budgets and a DOE Field Work Proposal in accordance with the
requirements in DOE
Order412.1WorkAuthorizationSystem,(http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfs/doe/doetext/neword/412/o4121.pdf)must
be saved as a Word file and named \"FFRDC ATTACHMENT.doc\"

**4.15 [MORE THAN ONE APPLICATION (JAN 2003)]{.underline}**

You may submit more than one application. Each application must have its
own unique title on the subject line (i.e., project title and principal
investigator/project director, if any). For each application, you must
first click on "Create Application" and then complete the information
requested.

**4.16 [APPLICATION DUE DATE - MULTIPLE DUE DATES (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

Applications and amendments of applications must be received by the
following dates, not later than 8:00 PM Eastern Time. You are encouraged
to transmit your application well before the deadline.

ROUND 1 -- Friday, April 12, 2004

ROUND 2 - TBD

APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING APPLICATION FILES, RECEIVED AFTER THE DEADLINE,
AS DEMONSTRATED BY THE IIPS DATE/TIME STAMP WILL NOT BE REVIEWED OR
CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

**4.17 [INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - NONE (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental
Review of Federal Programs\".

**4.18 [FUNDING RESTRICTIONS (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

COST PRINCIPLES

Cost must be allowable in accordance with the applicable cost principles
referenced in 10 CFR Part 600.

PRE-AWARD COSTS

Recipients may charge to an award resulting from this announcement
pre-award costs that were incurred within the ninety (90) calendar day
period immediately preceding the effective date of the award, if the
costs are necessary for the conduct of the project activities and are
otherwise allowable in accordance with the applicable cost principles
and the terms and conditions of the award. Recipients must obtain the
prior approval of the contracting officer for any pre-award costs that
are for periods greater than this 90 day calendar period.

Pre-award costs are incurred at the applicant\'s risk. DOE is under no
obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason the applicant does
not receive an award or if the award is made for a lesser amount than
the applicant expected.

\[IDENTIFY ANY OTHER LIMITATIONS ON COSTS, FOR EXAMPLE\]

FOREIGN TRAVEL

Cost of foreign travel is not allowable under an award made as a result
of this announcement.

**4.19 [OTHER SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Applications must be submitted through the DOE Industry Interactive
Procurement System (IIPS) at http://e-center.doe.gov. Instructions on
how to submit an application or an application amendment and how to
register, submit questions, and view questions and answers are located
on the web site at http://e-center.doe.gov, click on the "Help" button
and click on "Frequently Asked Questions".

Prepare all the required files in accordance with the instructions in
this announcement prior to starting the transmission process. Submit the
entire application package in one IIPS session (i.e., do not logoff
before all the files are submitted).

When you are ready to submit your application, go to
http://e-center.doe.gov and complete the IIPS cover page. Enter the
project title and the principal investigator/project director, if any,
in the "Subject" block. Then attach each file in the corresponding block
in accordance with the IIPS guidance. Follow the instructions for
submitting the application.

If you have any problems accessing information or submitting your
application, contact the Help Desk at 1 800-683-0751 and select option
1, or send an email to HelpDesk@pr.doe.gov. ONLY APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED
THROUGH IIPS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR AWARD.

ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE

Applications submitted through IIPS constitute submission of
electronically signed applications. The name of the authorized
organizational representative (i.e., the administrative official, who,
on behalf of the proposing organization, is authorized to make
certifications and assurances or to commit the applicant to the conduct
of a project) must be typed in the signature block on the form to be
accepted as an electronic signature. Do not submit a scanned copy of the
signed document.

IIPS REGISTRATION

In order to submit an application, you must be authorized by the
applicant (i.e., institution or business entity) to submit an
application on its behalf and you must register in IIPS. You are
encouraged to register as soon as possible. You only have to register
once to apply for any DOE award. To register go to http://e-center.gov
and follow the registration instructions.

**[SECTION V]{.underline}**

**[APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION]{.underline}**

**5.1 [INITIAL REVIEW CRITERIA (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Prior to a comprehensive merit evaluation, DOE will perform an initial
review to determine that (1) the applicant is eligible for an award; (2)
the information required by the announcement has been submitted; (3) all
mandatory requirements are satisfied; and (4) the proposed project is
responsive to the objectives of the funding opportunity announcement.

**5.2 [MERIT REVIEW CRITERIA (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Applications submitted in response to this funding opportunity will be
evaluated and scored in accordance with the criteria and weights listed
below:

**[Criterion 1- Scientific and Technical Merit -- 45%]{.underline}**

The degree to which the proposed technology or methodology represents an
important advancement toward achieving the research objectives for this
solicitation.

The degree to which the proposed work is based on sound scientific and
engineering principles including the current state of knowledge and
technology for the proposed work.

The anticipated benefits of the proposed work to the natural gas
industry in comparison to current commercial and emerging technologies
including how the proposed work will advance the current knowledge or
technology being proposed.

The significance to industry and the U.S. The extent to which, if
successfully developed, the technology would be adopted by industry,
increase gas reserves, decrease cost of gas supply, and improve
environmental performance of gas industry.

Feasibility of the proposed concept to contribute to a scientific or
technical breakthrough, including the likelihood of developing a new
successful technology.

**[Criterion 2 -- Technical Approach -- 35%]{.underline}**

Adequacy and feasibility of the applicant's technical approach and work
plan (phases, tasks, and subtasks) to achieving stated objectives.

Extent of prior use, research, development or application of the
proposed technology and appropriateness of how the prior work relates to
the proposed application of the technology.

Adequacy of the applicant\'s labor hours and justification required for
each task, including a table showing labor hours and labor categories
including subcontractors or consultants.

Adequacy of the proposed project schedule, and planned travel.

Potential for any problems or significant hurdles/delays that could
affect the project and mitigation strategies.

**[Criterion 3 -- Technical and Management Capabilities --
20%]{.underline}**

Credentials, capabilities and experience (technical and managerial) of
the organizations involved in the project including managing projects of
similar projects of similar type, size and complexity.

Credentials, capabilities and experience (technical and managerial) of
key personnel assigned to the project.

Demonstrated corporate experience of the applicant and participating
organizations in bringing advanced or innovative concepts into practical
applications by industry.

Clarity, logic and likely effectiveness of project organization
including subcontractors to successfully complete the project.

The adequacy and availability of the personnel, facilities and equipment
to perform project tasks

**5.3 [OTHER SELECTION FACTORS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

These factors, while not indicators of the Application\'s merit, e.g.,
technical excellence, cost, Applicant\'s ability, etc., may be essential
to the process of selecting the application(s) that, individually or
collectively, will best achieve the program objectives. Such factors are
often beyond the control of the Applicant. Applicants should recognize
that some very good applications may not receive an award because they
do not fit within a mix of projects which maximizes the probability of
achieving the DOE\'s overall research and development objectives.
Therefore, the following Program Policy Factors may be used by the
Selection Official to assist in determining which of the ranked
application(s) shall receive DOE funding support.

1\. Selection of less technical merit project(s) for award may be more
desirable than another project(s), if such a selection will optimize use
of available funds by allowing more projects to be supported while not
being detrimental to the overall objectives of the program.

> 2\. The desirability of selecting projects that collectively with the
> rest of the DOE Fossil Energy Program represent a diversity of U.S.
> geographic locations.
>
> 3\. The desirability of selecting projects that collectively with the
> rest of the DOE Fossil Energy Program represents diverse types and
> sizes of proposing organizations.
>
> 4\. It may be desirable to select a project(s) for award that
> represents a diversity of technology concepts and applications, as
> well as technical approaches.
>
> 5\. The desirability of selecting projects that have extensive
> industry support as evidenced by the teaming arrangement proposed.

The above factors will be independently considered by the Selection
Official in determining the optimum mix of applications that will be
selected for support. These policy factors will provide the Selection
Official with the capability of developing, from the competitive funding
opportunity, a broad involvement of organizations and organizational
ideas, which both enhance the overall technology research effort and
upgrade the program content to meet the goals of the DOE.

**5.4 [REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

MERIT REVIEW

Applications that pass the initial review will be subjected to a merit
review in accordance with the guidance provided in the "Department of
Energy Merit Review Guide for Financial Assistance and Unsolicited
Proposals". This guide is available at
http://professionals.pr.doe.gov/ma5/ma-5web.nsf/?Open under Financial
Assistance, Regulations and Guidance.

SELECTION

The Selection Official will consider the merit review recommendation,
program policy factors, and the amount of funds available.

DISCUSSIONS AND AWARD

The Government may enter into discussions with a selected applicant for
any reason deemed necessary, including but not limited to,: (1) the
budget is not appropriate or reasonable for the requirement; (2) only a
portion of the application is selected for award; (3) the Government
needs additional information to determine that the recipient is capable
of complying with the requirements in 10 CFR 600; and/or (4) special
terms and conditions are required. Failure to resolve satisfactorily the
issues identified by the Government will preclude award to the
applicant.

**5.5 [ANTICIPATED ANNOUNCEMENT AND AWARD DATES MULTIPLE DUE DATES (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

Round 1 - DOE anticipates notifying applicants selected for award under
Round 1 by July 15, 2004 and making awards by September 20, 2004.

Round 2 - TBD

**[SECTION VI]{.underline}**

**[AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION]{.underline}**

**6.1 [AWARD NOTICES (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

NOTICE OF SELECTION

DOE will notify applicants selected for award. This notice of selection
is not an authorization to begin performance. (See Section IV with
respect to the allowability of pre-award costs.)

Organizations whose applications have not been selected will be advised
as promptly as possible. This notice will explain why the application
was not selected.

NOTICE OF AWARD

A Notice of Financial Assistance Award issued by the contracting officer
is the authorizing award document. It includes, either as an attachment
or by reference: (1) a budget that indicates the amounts, by categories
of expenses, on which the agency has based its support; (2) the
application; (3) applicable program regulations, if any; (4) special
terms and conditions; (5) DOE assistance regulations at 10 CFR part 600,
or, for Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) institutions, the FDP
terms and conditions; and (6) a reporting checklist, which identifies
the reporting requirements.

**6.2 [ADMINISTRATIVE AND NATIONAL POLICY REQUIREMENTS (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

The administrative requirements and national policy requirements (e.g.,
"generally applicable requirements") for DOE grants and cooperative
agreements are contained in 10 CFR Part 600, except for grants made to
Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) institutions. The FDP terms and
conditions and DOE FDP agency specific terms and conditions are located
on the National Science Foundation web site at www.nsf.gov. "Generally
applicable requirements" are defined in 10 CFR 600.12.

**6.3 [LOBBYING RESTRICTION (INTERIOR ACT, 2003) (JULY
2003)]{.underline}**

The awardee agrees that none of the funds obligated on this award shall
be made available for any activity or the publication or distribution of
literature that in any way tends to promote public support or opposition
to any legislative proposal on which Congressional action is not
complete. This restriction is in addition to those prescribed elsewhere
in statute and regulation.

A copy of the DOE "Lobbying Brochure" which provides a summary of the
statutory and regulatory restrictions regarding lobbying activities for
Federal contractors can be found at

http://professionals.pr.doe.gov/ma5/MA-5Web.nsf/Procurement/Lobbying+Brochure?OpenDocument

**6.4 [NOTICE REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF AMERICAN-MADE EQUIPMENT AND
PRODUCTS \-- SENSE OF CONGRESS (JULY 2003)]{.underline}**

It is the sense of the Congress that, to the greatest extent
practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made
available under this award should be American-made.

**6.5 [COMPLIANCE WITH BUY AMERICAN ACT (JULY 2003)]{.underline}**

In accepting this award, the Recipient agrees to comply with sections 2
through 4 of the Act of March 3, 1933 (41 U.S.C. 10a-10c, popularly
known as the "Buy American Act"). The Recipient should review the
provisions of the Act to ensure that expenditures made under this award
are in accordance with it.

**6.6 [REPORTING (NOV 1998)]{.underline}**

Failure to comply with the reporting requirements contained in this
award will be considered a material noncompliance with the terms of the
award. Noncompliance may result in a withholding of future payments,
suspension or termination of the current award, and withholding of
future awards. A willful failure to perform, a history of failure to
perform, or of unsatisfactory performance of this and/or other financial
assistance awards, may also result in a debarment action to preclude
future awards by Federal agencies.

**6.7 [ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY & HEALTH (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

The recipient must comply with applicable Federal, State, and local
environmental, safety and health laws and regulations for work performed
under this award.

**6.8 [NOTICE REGARDING UNALLOWABLE COSTS AND LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (NOV
1998)]{.underline}**

Recipients of financial assistance are cautioned to carefully review the
allowable cost and other provisions applicable to expenditures under
their particular award instruments. If financial assistance funds are
spent for purposes or in amounts inconsistent with the allowable cost or
any other provisions governing expenditures in an award instrument, the
government may pursue a number of remedies against the Recipient,
including in appropriate circumstances, recovery of such funds,
termination of the award, suspension or debarment of the Recipient from
future awards, and criminal prosecution for false statements.

Particular care should be taken by the Recipient to comply with the
provisions prohibiting the expenditure of funds for lobbying and related
activities. Financial assistance awards may be used to describe and
promote the understanding of scientific and technical aspects of
specific energy technologies, but not to encourage or support political
activities such as the collection and dissemination of information
related to potential, planned or pending legislation.

**6.9 [STATEMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL INVOLVEMENT (AUG 2003)]{.underline}**

A Statement of Substantial Involvement article will be negotiated with
each successful applicant prior to award. This article is project
specific and will fully define the DOE and Recipient's responsibilities
as they relate to each individual award.

**6.10 [REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (DEC 2003)]{.underline}**

The Reporting Requirements are identified on the Federal Assistance
Reporting Checklist attached to the award agreement. See model
Cooperative Agreement at
<http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/faapiaf/MODEL.PDF>. In addition to the
minimum reports required in the model Cooperative Agreement, a
semi-annual technical progress report is required.

**[SECTION VII]{.underline}**

**[AGENCY CONTACTS]{.underline}**

**7.1 [QUESTIONS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Questions regarding the content of the announcement should be submitted
through the "Submit Question" feature of the DOE Industry Interactive
Procurement System (IIPS) at
[http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/). Locate the
announcement on IIPS and then click on the "Submit Question" button.
Enter required information. You will receive an electronic notification
that your question has been answered. DOE will try to respond to a
question within 3 days, unless a similar question and answer have
already been posted on the website.

Responses to questions may be viewed through the "View Questions"
feature, button. If no questions have been answered, a statement to that
effect will appear. You should periodically check "View Questions" for
new questions and answers.

Questions regarding how to submit questions or view responses can be
e-mailed to the IIPS HELP Desk at helpdesk@pr.doe.gov or by calling 1
(800) 683-0751.

**[SECTION VIII]{.underline}**

**[OTHER INFORMATION]{.underline}**

**8.1 [MODIFICATIONS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

Notices of any modifications to this announcement will be posted on the
DOE Industry Interactive Procurement System (IIPS).

If you register in IIPS, you may "Join the Mailing List" to receive an
email when a modification or an announcement message is posted. To view
modifications and announcement messages, locate the announcement on IIPS
and click on the yellow folder next to the announcement number.

**8.2 [GOVERNMENT RIGHT TO REJECT OR NEGOTIATE (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

DOE reserves the right, without qualification, to reject any or all
applications received in response to this announcement and to select any
application, in whole or in part, as a basis for negotiation and/or
award.

**8.3 [COMMITMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

The Contracting Officer is the only individual who can make awards or
commit the Government to the expenditure of public funds. A commitment
by other than the Contracting Officer, either explicit or implied, is
invalid.

**8.4 [PROPRIETARY APPLICATION INFORMATION (OCT 2003)]{.underline}**

An application may include data, including trade secrets and/or
privileged or confidential commercial or financial information which the
applicant does not want disclosed to the public or used for any purpose
other than evaluation of the application (See 10 CFR 600.15). The use
and disclosure of such data may be restricted, provided the applicant
marks the cover sheet of the application with the following legend and
specifies the pages of the application which are to be restricted:

"The data contained in pages \[ \] of this application have been
submitted in

confidence and contain trade secrets or proprietary information, and
such data

shall be used or disclosed only for evaluation purposes, provided that
if this

applicant receives an award as a result of or in connection with the
submission

of this application, DOE shall have the right to use or disclose the
data

herein to the extent provided in the award. This restriction does not
limit the

government\'s right to use or disclose data obtained without restriction
from

any source, including the applicant."

To protect such data, each line or paragraph on the pages containing
such data must be specifically identified and marked with a legend
similar to the following:

"Use or disclosure of the data set forth above is subject to the
restriction on the cover page of this application."

**8.5 [INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPED UNDER THIS PROGRAM (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

PATENT RIGHTS

The government will have certain statutory rights in an invention that
is conceived or first actually reduced to practice under a DOE award. 42
U.S.C. 5908 provides that title to such inventions vests in the United
States, except where 35 U.S.C. 202 provides otherwise for nonprofit
organizations or small business firms. However, the Secretary of Energy
may waive all or any part of the rights of the United States subject to
certain conditions. (See the clause entitled "Notice of Right to Request
Patent Waiver" below.)

RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA

Normally, the government has unlimited rights in technical data created
under a DOE agreement. Delivery or third party licensing of proprietary
software or data developed solely at private expense will not normally
be required except as specifically negotiated in a particular agreement
to satisfy DOE\'s own needs or to insure the commercialization of
technology developed under a DOE agreement.

SPECIAL PROTECTED DATA STATUTES

This program is covered by a special protected data statute. The
provisions of the statute provide for the protection from public
disclosure, for a period of up to 5 years from the development of the
information, data that would be trade secret, or commercial or financial
information that is privileged or confidential, if the information had
been obtained from a non-Federal party. Generally, the provision
entitled, Rights in Data Programs Covered under Special Protected Data
Statutes, (10 CFR 600 Appendix A to Subpart D), would apply to an award
made under this announcement. This provision will identify data or
categories of data first produced in the performance of the award that
will be made available to the public, notwithstanding the statutory
authority to withhold data from public dissemination, and will also
identify data that will be recognized by the parties as protected data.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROVISIONS

The standard DOE financial assistance intellectual property provisions
applicable to the various types of recipients are located at
http://www.gc.doe.gov/gcmain.html.

**8.6 [NOTICE OF RIGHT TO REQUEST PATENT WAIVER (OCT
2003)]{.underline}**

Applicants may request a waiver of all or any part of the rights of the
United States in inventions conceived or first actually reduced to
practice in performance of an agreement as a result of this
announcement, in advance of or within 30 days after the effective date
of the award. Even if such advance waiver is not requested or the
request is denied, the recipient will have a continuing right under the
award to request a waiver of the rights of the United States in
identified inventions, i.e., individual inventions conceived or first
actually reduced to practice in performance of the award. Any patent
waiver that may be granted is subject to certain terms and conditions in
10 CFR 784.

Domestic small businesses and domestic nonprofit organizations will
receive the patent rights clause at 37 CFR 401.14, i.e., the
implementation of the Bayh-Dole Act. This clause permits domestic small
business and domestic nonprofit organizations to retain title to subject
inventions. Therefore, small businesses and nonprofit organizations do
not need to request a waiver.

**8.7 [NOTICE REGARDING ELIGIBLE/INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES (AUG
1999)]{.underline}**

Eligible activities under this program include those which describe and
promote the understanding of scientific and technical aspects of
specific energy technologies, but not those which encourage or support
political activities such as the collection and dissemination of
information related to potential, planned or pending legislation.

**8.8 [EVALUATION BY NON-FEDERAL REVIEWERS (OCT 2003]{.underline})**

In conducting the merit review evaluation, the Government plans to use
qualified non Federal personnel (e.g., DOE management and operating
contractors, universities personnel, or other scientific/technical
experts) as reviewers or advisors. The applicant, by submitting its
application, consents to the use of non-Federal reviewers. Non-Federal
reviewers will be required to sign a Conflict-of-Interest/Non-Disclosure
Certificate prior to reviewing any application.