Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpa0

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - native veg.

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: BCS NRCS Land Use: Wildlife

System Narrative Template:

Existing CRP consisting of predominantly (51% or more) native vegetative
species. Livestock Exclusion (472) was the conservation practice
maintained on the land unit. Existing cover is overgrown and not
providing optimum wildlife habitat.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

472 00N USE EXCLUSION

550 s01 RANGE PLANTING

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Cover has controlled airborne       
  sediment                            
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Upland Wildlife Habitat

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Habitat has been provided for       
  wildlife spp.                       
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  CRP cover has reduced cropping      
  costs and maintained a constant     
  income.                             
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of management has resulted in  
  poor plant vigor.                   
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Increased infiltration resulted in  
  ground water recharge.              
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 1.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.50 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpab

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - native veg.

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: BCS NRCS Land Use: Wildlife

System Narrative Template:

Existing CRP consisting of predominantly (51% or more) native vegetative
species. Livestock Exclusion (472) was the conservation practice
maintained on the land unit. Existing cover is overgrown and not
providing optimum wildlife habitat.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

472 00N USE EXCLUSION

550 s01 RANGE PLANTING

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Cover has controlled airborne       
  sediment.                           
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  CRP cover has reduced cropping      
  costs and maintained a constant     
  income                              
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of management has resulted in  
  poor plant vigor                    
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Increased infiltration resulted in  
  ground water recharge               
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 1.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.50 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpb0

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - introduced veg.

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: BCS NRCS Land Use: Wildlife

System Narrative Template:

Existing CRP consisting of predominantly (51% or more) introduced
vegetative species. Livestock Exclusion (472) was the conservation
practice maintained on the land unit. Existing cover is overgrown and
not providing optimum wildlife habitat.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

472 00N USE EXCLUSION

550 s01 RANGE PLANTING

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Cover has controlled airborne       
  sediment                            
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Upland Wildlife Habitat

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  CRP has eliminated annual cropping  
  costs and stabilized income         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of management has resulted in  
  poor plant vigor                    
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Increased infiltration resulted in  
  ground water recharge.              
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 1.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.50 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpbb

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - introduced veg.

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: BCS NRCS Land Use: Wildlife

System Narrative Template:

Existing CRP consisting of predominantly (51% or more) introduced
vegetative species. Livestock Exclusion (472) was the conservation
practice maintained on the land unit. Existing cover is overgrown and
not providing optimum wildlife habitat.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

472 00N USE EXCLUSION

550 s01 RANGE PLANTING

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Cover has controlled airborne       
  sediment                            
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  CRP has eliminated annual cropping  
  costs and stabilized income         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of management has resulted in  
  poor plant vigor.                   
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Effect Value                      | Impact Value                     |
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Increased infiltration resulted   |                                  |
| in ground water                   |                                  |
|                                   |                                  |
| recharge                          |                                  |
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------+

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 1.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.50 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpc0

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - introduced, reseeding

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: BCS NRCS Land Use: Wildlife

System Narrative Template:

Existing CRP consists of predominantly (51% or more) introduced
vegetative species. Livestock Exclusion (472) was the conservation
practice maintained on the land unit. Existing cover is overgrown and
not providing optimum wildlife habitat.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

472 00N USE EXCLUSION

550 s01 RANGE PLANTING

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Cover has controlled airborne       
  sediment.                           
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Upland Wildlife Habitat

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  CRP has eliminated annual cropping  
  costs and stabilized income         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of management has resulted in  
  poor plant vigor.                   
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Increased infiltration resulted in  
  ground water recharge               
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 1.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.50 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpcb

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - introduced, reseeding

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: BCS NRCS Land Use: Wildlife

System Narrative Template:

Existing CRP consists of predominantly (51% or more) introduced
vegetative species. Livestock Exclusion (472) was the conservation
practice maintained on the land unit. Existing cover is overgrown and
not providing optimum wildlife habitat.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

472 00N USE EXCLUSION

550 s01 RANGE PLANTING

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Cover has controlled airborne       
  sediment.                           
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  CRP has eliminated annual cropping  
  costs and stabilized income         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of management has resulted in  
  poor plant vigor                    
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Increased infiltration resulted in  
  ground water recharge.              
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 1.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.50 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpd0

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - irrigated cropland

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: ACS NRCS Land Use: Crop

System Narrative Template:

Irrigated cropland that is subject to wind erosion. Soils are droughty,
making establishment of permanent vegetative cover difficult.
Conservation practices were previously applied to the land unit to meet
compliance requirements.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

442 s01 IRRIGATION SYSTEM, SPRINKLER

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of cover has resulted in       
  airborne sediment during wind       
  erosion events.                     
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Upland Wildlife Habitat

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Income from the cropland has been   
  based on crop yields and market     
  conditions                          
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

.

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Crop yields have been determined by 
  the level of management at the      
  site.                               
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Reduced infiltration limited ground 
  water recharge.                     
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 15.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.20 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpdb

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - irrigated cropland

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: ACS NRCS Land Use: Crop

System Narrative Template:

Irrigated cropland that is subject to wind erosion. Soils are droughty,
making establishment of permanent vegetative cover difficult.
Conservation practices were previously applied to the land unit to meet
compliance requirements.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

442 s01 IRRIGATION SYSTEM, SPRINKLER

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of cover has resulted in       
  airborne sediment during wind       
  erosion events.                     
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Income from the cropland has been   
  based on crop yields and market     
  conditions.                         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Crop yields have been determined by 
  the level of management at the      
  site.                               
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Reduced infiltration limited ground 
  water recharge.                     
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 15.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.20 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpe0

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - converted from dry crop.

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: ACS NRCS Land Use: Crop

System Narrative Template:

Non-irrigated cropland that is subject to wind erosion. Lack of
dependable soil moisture will be considered when seeding permanent
vegetation. Conservation practices were previously applied to the land
unit to meet compliance requirements.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of cover has resulted in       
  airborne sediment during wind       
  erosion events                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

.

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Upland Wildlife Habitat

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Wildlife Habitat does not meet key  
  spp needs.                          
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Income from the cropland has been   
  based on crop yields and market     
  conditions.                         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Crop yields have been determined by 
  the level of management at the      
  site.                               
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Reduced infiltration limited ground 
  water recharge.                     
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 15.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.20 HSI

Management System Templates

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

System Template Label: crpeb

System Template Name: CRP Wildlife Benchmark - converted from dry crop.

Planning Phase: BENCHMARK Planning Level: ACS NRCS Land Use: Crop

System Narrative Template:

Non-irrigated cropland that is subject to wind erosion. Lack of
dependable soil moisture will be considered when seeding permanent
vegetation. Conservation practices were previously applied to the land
unit to meet compliance requirements.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Practices\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Text
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

AIR QUALITY, Airborne Sediment & Smoke Particulates, conveyance

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Lack of cover has resulted in       
  airborne sediment during wind       
  erosion events.                     
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

HUMAN ECONOMICS, Farm/Ranch Financial Condition

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Income from the cropland has been   
  based on crop yields and market     
  conditions.                         
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

PLANTS CONDITION, Plants Health & Vigor

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Crop yields have been determined by 
  the level of management at the      
  site.                               
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

WATER QUANTITY, Other

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  Effect Value                        Impact Value

  Reduced infiltration limited ground 
  water recharge                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--Numeric
Effects\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

SOIL EROSION, Wind, WEQ Annual Method 15.0 Tons/Ac/Yr

ANIMALS (WILDLIFE) HABITAT, Wildlife Habitat Suitability Index 0.20 HSI