Study Title

Percent Crop Treated Refinement and its Impact on the Acute Drinking
Water

Dietary Assessment for Carbofuran

**Data Requirement**

Not Applicable

**Author**

Robert T. Morris, Ph.D.

**Study Completion Date**

November 10, 2005

**Performing Laboratory/Testing Facility**

FMC Corporation

Agricultural Products Group

P.O. Box 8

Princeton, NJ 08543

\(609\) 951-3000

**Sponsor**

FMC Corporation

Agricultural Products Group

1735 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

\(215\) 299-6436

**Report Number**

P-3790

© 2005 FMC Corporation

All rights reserved

# STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS

No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in
this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA **§**10
(d) (1) (A), (B), or (C).

Company: FMC Corporation

**\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

Donald Carlson, Ph.D. Date

Manager, Product Registrations

**COMPANY AGENT**

# GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

The following risk assessment is not required to follow Good Laboratory
Practice Standards (GLPS) set forth in Title 40, Part 160 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) of the United States of America. Multiple
studies used as references for this document were conducted in
accordance with the appropriate GLP standards as verified by the GLP
compliance statements found in those study reports.

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Robert T. Morris, Ph.D. Date

Research Risk Assessment Specialist

**AUTHOR**

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Donald B. Carlson, Ph.D. Date

Manager, Product Registrations

**SPONSOR/ SUBMITTER**

# ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS

+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| [                         | > [Definition]{.underline}               |
| Abbreviation]{.underline} |                                          |
+===========================+==========================================+
| A                         | > acre                                   |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| ai                        | > active ingredient                      |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| EFED                      | > Environmental Fate and Effects         |
|                           | > Division                               |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| EXAMS                     | > EXposure Analysis Modeling System      |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| FIRST                     | > FQPA Index Reservoir Screening Tool    |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| HED                       | > Health Effects Division                |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| kg                        | > kilogram(s)                            |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| L                         | > liter(s)                               |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| lb                        | > pound                                  |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| MRID                      | > Master Record Identification           |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| n                         | > number                                 |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| NA                        | > not applicable                         |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| ND                        | > not detectable                         |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| OPPTS                     | > Office of Prevention, Pesticides and   |
|                           | > Toxic Substances                       |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| PCA                       | > Percent Cropped Area                   |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| PCT                       | > Percent Crop Treated                   |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| ppb                       | > parts per billion                      |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| ppm                       | > parts per million                      |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| PRZM                      | > Pesticide Root Zone Model              |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| RED                       | > Reregistration Eligibility Decision    |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| USDA                      | > United States Department of            |
|                           | > Agriculture                            |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| USEPA                     | > United States Environmental Protection |
|                           | > Agency                                 |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| USGS                      | > United States Geological Survey        |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| WARP                      | > Watershed Area Regressions for         |
|                           | > Pesticides                             |
+---------------------------+------------------------------------------+

#   {#section .unnumbered}

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

[STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS
2](#statement-of-no-data-confidentiality-claims)

[GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
3](#good-laboratory-practice-compliance-statement)

[ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS 4](#abbreviations-and-symbols)

[TABLE OF CONTENTS 5](#table-of-contents)

[1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6](#executive-summary)

[2.0 INTRODUCTION 7](#introduction)

[3.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENTS
7](#exposure-assessment-and-refinements)

[3.1 Estimation of Surface Water Exposure
8](#estimation-of-surface-water-exposure)

[3.2 Percent Crop Treated Refinement
8](#percent-crop-treated-refinement)

[4.0 RESULTS 9](#results)

[4.1 Comparison to WARP Data 9](#comparison-to-warp-data)

[4.2 Comparison to USGS Reservoir Monitoring Data
10](#comparison-to-usgs-reservoir-monitoring-data)

[6.0 REFERENCES 12](#references)

[TABLES 13](#tables)

[Table 1 -- Chemical Input Parameters for Carbofuran
13](#table-1-chemical-input-parameters-for-carbofuran)

[Table 2 - Estimated Peak Surface Drinking Water Concentrations for a
Single 1 lb ai/A application of Carbofuran Using the FIRST Model
13](#table-2---estimated-peak-surface-drinking-water-concentrations-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-of-carbofuran-using-the-first-model)

[APPENDIX 1 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to
Corn or PA Alfalfa
14](#appendix-1---first-output-files-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-to-corn-or-pa-alfalfa)

[APPENDIX 2 - FIRST Ouput Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to CA
alfalfa
16](#appendix-2---first-ouput-files-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-to-ca-alfalfa)

[APPENDIX 3 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to
TX Sorghum
18](#appendix-3---first-output-files-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-to-tx-sorghum)

[APPENDIX 4 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to
Cotton Nationwide
20](#appendix-4---first-output-files-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-to-cotton-nationwide)

[APPENDIX 5 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to
ME Potato
22](#appendix-5---first-output-files-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-to-me-potato)

[Aerial Application 22](#aerial-application)

[APPENDIX 6 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to
ID Potato
24](#appendix-6---first-output-files-for-a-single-1-lb-aia-application-to-id-potato)

#   {#section-1 .unnumbered}

# 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

FMC Corporation is providing additional information to the US EPA
(United States Environmental Protection Agency) to outline a more
realistic estimation of surface water concentrations resulting from
agricultural uses of carbofuran. Both the PCT (percent crop treated)
approach in this assessment and the WARP (Watershed Area Regression for
Pesticides) approach from a previous assessment incorporate usage data
in modeling predictions. In this report, the recent EPA dietary exposure
data was used to closely match internal sales data used in the recent
carbofuran WARP assessment.

The PCT approach using FIRST modeling was performed to reflect a single
application at 1 lb ai/A (pound active ingredient per acre) using
aerial, ground and in-furrow application techniques. A single 1 lb
treatment was simulated on corn, alfalfa, cotton, sorghum, and potatoes.
The purpose of this simulation was to allow comparison between existing
WARP and PRZM (Pesticide Root Zone Model)/EXAMS (EXposure Analysis
Modeling System) modeling estimates. To facilitate this comparison, a
uniform 1 lb ai/A rate was utilized, although carbofuran label rates
below and above 1 lb ai/A exists. The average PCT figures from the 2005
HED chapter for the five cropping scenarios were utilized. Nationwide
and regional PCA (percent crop area) adjustments from the current
drinking water HED assessment were included in the evaluation.

Under the PCT approach, estimated carbofuran surface water
concentrations from aerial, ground and in-furrow applications for the
single 1 lb treatments were as follows (Table A):

**Table A -- Estimated Carbofuran Surface Water Concentrations from
Aerial, Ground and In-furrow Applications for the Single 1 lb
Treatments**

+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| **Crop**    | **PCA**     | **PCT**     | **Estimated | **Estimated |
|             |             |             | Surface     | Surface     |
|             | **A         | **Average** | Water       | Water       |
|             | djustment** |             | Conc        | Co          |
|             |             | **(%)**     | entration** | ncentration |
|             | **(%)**     |             |             | from**      |
|             |             |             | **from**    |             |
|             |             |             |             | **In-furrow |
|             |             |             | **Ae        | A           |
|             |             |             | rial/Ground | pplications |
|             |             |             | A           | (ppb)**     |
|             |             |             | pplications |             |
|             |             |             | (ppb)**     |             |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| corn        | 46          | \<1         | 0.5         | 0.3         |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| alfalfa     | 46 to 56    | \<1         | 0.5 to 0.6  | 0.3 to 0.4  |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| sorghum     | 67          | \<1         | 0.7         | 0.5         |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| cotton      | 20          | 5           | 2.5         | 0.5         |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| potatoes    | 14 to 63    | 10          | 5.0         | 1.0 to 4.0  |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+

The results of the PCT approach are conservative and protective when
compared directly to the results from the USGS (United States Geological
Survey)/USEPA Reservoir Monitoring Study performed in 1999-2000 and
closely resemble the maximum 90^th^ percent value of 0.37 ppb from a
recent WARP assessment.

Incorporation of additional factors into PCT approach allows for a
conservative yet more refined prediction of surface water concentrations
in reservoirs used for drinking water. Incorporating these factors into
the PCT approach using FIRST modeling provided outputs comparable to
those from WARP; a model that incorporates usage intensity.

This assessment provides additional evidence that the actual
concentrations expected in drinking water reservoirs are far below the
concentrations predicted by recent EPA modeling. Hence, the results of
this assessment are more suitable for use in a dietary assessment for
carbofuran.

# INTRODUCTION

FMC Corporation has provided previous comments to EFED stating that the
Tier II model PRZM/EXAMS over estimates potential carbofuran surface
water concentrations when output values are compared to the wealth of
monitoring data that is available (Reference 1). Tier II surface water
modeling outputs from Texas sorghum and Illinois corn scenarios were
used by the EPA for the acute human dietary assessment (Reference 2).

In this current assessment, drinking water refinements are presented to
the EPA as an alternative approach for the more realistic (but still
conservative) estimation of surface water concentrations. The PCT
approach incorporates average usage data as an input to the Tier I
screening level runoff prediction tool within the FIRST model, to
estimate surface water concentrations. Incorporation of usage data
result in a more realistic and more refined exposure assessment. The PCT
approach is considered to be complementary to WARP since both approaches
allow correction for the relatively small amount of carbofuran applied
on an annual basis.

PCT type approaches have been discussed in previous scientific forums.
It was recommended by the majority of the members of the May 1999 FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act) SAP (Scientific Advisory
Panel) meeting suggested that EPA incorporate PCT in future model
refinements, especially for the assessment of lower market share
compounds (e.g. carbofuran) (Reference 3).

# 3.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENTS

The Tier I FIRST Model uses the following information for a screening
level prediction:

(i) Basic chemical parameters consisting of Koc, water solubility, soil
    aerobic metabolism half-life, aerobic aquatic half-life, and
    photolysis half-life from the current HED Chapter.

(ii) Average usage data and percent crop areas from the current
     carbofuran HED RED chapter. The two parameters are simply
     multiplied together for input into the model. In the case of less
     than \<1% average, 0.9% or 0.009 as a decimal fraction was used as
     the value prior to multiplying by the PCA (Percent Cropped Area).
     For example, a calculation for corn would be as follows:

> 0.009 (corn treated usage data) x 0.46 (national PCA) = 0.004

## 3.1 Estimation of Surface Water Exposure

> FIRST Version 1.0 (May 16, 2001) (Reference 4) was used to predict
> untreated water concentrations. Five different crops consisting of
> corn, alfalfa, cotton, sorghum, and potato were simulated using EPA
> chemical input values. For modeling simulations, a single 1 lb ai/A
> treatment was applied by either aerial, ground, or in-furrow (2 inch
> depth incorporation) techniques. The chemical input values are
> provided in Table 1.
>
> The PCA assumption was included in the modeling (Reference 2). A PCA
> is the largest percent of a watershed covered by a single crop either
> nationally, by region, or by a state. National default factors used by
> the EPA are 46% for corn and 20% for cotton. Regional default factors
> include 46% for PA alfalfa, 56% for CA alfalfa, 14% for ME potatoes,
> 63% for ID potatoes, and 67% for TX sorghum. The PCA adjustment
> applied is included in Table 2.

## Percent Crop Treated Refinement

> The PCT approach used values that were selected from screening level
> usage data presented in the Dietary carbofuran RED Chapter (Reference
> 5). An average value rather than a maximum value from EPA sources was
> selected for direct comparison to average FMC internal usage data for
> the state of IL previously included in a recent WARP assessment as a
> confidential business attachment (Reference 6).

# 

# 4.0 RESULTS

Estimated carbofuran surface water concentrations arising from aerial or
ground applications for single 1 lb treatments were as follows and
included in Table 2.

**Table B -- Estimated Carbofuran Surface Water Concentrations from
Aerial, Ground and In-furrow Applications for the Single 1 lb Treatments
and Output File Locations.**

+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+
| **Crop** | **PCA** | **PCT** | *          | *          | *         |
|          |         |         | *Estimated | *Estimated | *Location |
|          | **Adjus | **Av    | Surface    | Surface    | of        |
|          | tment** | erage** | Water      | Water      | Output/   |
|          |         |         | Conce      | Con        | Results** |
|          | **(%)** | **(%)** | ntration** | centration |           |
|          |         |         |            | from**     | **In      |
|          |         |         | **from**   |            | A         |
|          |         |         |            | *          | ppendix** |
|          |         |         | **Aer      | *In-furrow |           |
|          |         |         | ial/Ground | Ap         | *         |
|          |         |         | Ap         | plications | *Number** |
|          |         |         | plications | (ppb)**    |           |
|          |         |         | (ppb)**    |            |           |
+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+
| corn     | 46      | \<1     | 0.5        | 0.3        | 1         |
+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+
| alfalfa  | 46 to   | \<1     | 0.5 to 0.6 | 0.3 to 0.4 | PA in 1 & |
|          | 56      |         |            |            |           |
|          |         |         |            |            | CA in 2   |
+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+
| sorghum  | 67      | \<1     | 0.7        | 0.5        | 3         |
+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+
| cotton   | 20      | 5       | 2.5        | 0.5        | 4         |
+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+
| potatoes | 14 to   | 10      | 5.0        | 1.0 to 4.0 | ME in 5 & |
|          | 63      |         |            |            |           |
|          |         |         |            |            | ID in 6   |
+----------+---------+---------+------------+------------+-----------+

Location of output files appear in the Table B above.

## 4.1 Comparison to WARP Data

The results of the PCT approach are similar to those from a recently
completed FMC WARP assessment for IL (Reference 6). The results from
both assessments are considerably lower than those PRZM/EXAMS results in
the 2005 EPA RED.

The modified FIRST outputs were compared to WARP as a validation of the
technique. The maximum WARP 90^th^ percentile value from IL is 0.37 ppb
while the most refined PCT values with less than 1% average PCT range
per corn from 0.3 ppb for an in-furrow application to 0.5 ppb for aerial
and ground applications.

The comparison of techniques within the state of IL is reasonable since:

(i) The screening model FIRST was developed using data collected on the
    Shipman Reservoir in IL

(ii) Predominant carbofuran usage is on corn in IL at the rates
     simulated

WARP model uses compound usage data and available monitoring data to
predict the concentration of that compound within unmonitored streams.
The accuracy of the overall prediction is based upon the accuracy of
usage data within a given watershed and the strength of the evidence
that the monitoring data is reflective of the given stream that it
represents. For carbofuran, usage data at the county level is available
through Doanes and FMC while extensive stream monitoring data is
available through the USGS NAWQA program.

## Comparison to USGS Reservoir Monitoring Data

The results of this analysis and WARP are conservative and protective
when compared directly to results from the USGS Reservoir Monitoring
Study performed in 1999-2000 (Reference 7).

Twelve reservoirs and community water systems of various sizes in twelve
different states (CA, IN, LA, MO, NY, NC, OH, OK, PA, SC, SD, and TX)
were sampled to provide information on pesticide concentrations in
drinking water and to assist in the implementation of the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996.

Samples of water were collected quarterly throughout the year and at
weekly or bi-weekly intervals following the primary pesticide
application periods. According to the study abstract, drinking-water
utilities that withdrew from reservoirs were sampled because reservoirs
are vulnerable to pesticide contamination; integrate pesticide loading
from their watersheds, and show smaller temporal variations than
streams.

Only 5 carbofuran detections (\< 1%) were reported out of 551 samples
collected in the study. The maximum concentration of carbofuran detected
was only 0.050 ppb with the 95^th^ percentile value below the reporting
limit of 0.003 ppb. In other words, single highest actual, monitored
carbofuran concentration in surface water is one to two orders of
magnitude lower than the concentrations modeled above, further
demonstrating that the methodology employed above is amply conservative
and unlikely to understate actual concentrations that might be observed
in the environment.

**5.0 CONCLUSIONS**

The PCT modeling approach (i.e. corn) provides modeling estimates that
are comparable to a WARP assessment previously performed by FMC for the
state of IL. Both PCT and WARP illustrate the importance of usage
intensity and typical application patterns in estimating drinking water
concentrations for surface water sources.

The surface water modeling results from both the PCT and WARP approaches
are significantly lower than the results generated by the EPA using
PRZM/EXAMS. In addition, the results from PCT and WARP are conservative
and protective when compared to results obtained in the USGS/EPA
Reservoir Monitoring Study of 1999-2000. A weight of evidence view of
available information indicates that concentrations predicted in this
assessment are more reflective of actual concentrations observed in the
environment. Hence, the results of this assessment (0.37 ppb) are more
suitable for use in a dietary assessment for carbofuran.

# 6.0 REFERENCES

1\. Morris, R., Nissen-Meyer S., Glazer- McCoy, E. and Mitchell, G. "FMC
Response Commments to OPP-2005-0162 the EPA June 3, 2005 RED" EPA Public
Docket no. OPP-2005-0162-011 dated as June 3, 2005, FMC Corporation,
Philadelphia, PA, August 23, 2005.

2\. Young, Dirk F. "Drinking Water Estimated Concentrations" ,Located on
EPA Public Docket as OPP-2005-0162-0033", USEPA, Jan. 27, 2005

3\. EPA "THE AGENCY'S RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT FQPA
SCIENCE POLICY DOCUMENT" on "Estimating the Drinking Water Component of
a Dietary Exposure Assessment" October 19, 1999

4\. FQPA INDEX RESERVOIR SCREENING TOOL (FIRST) Version 1.0,
Environmental Fates and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, August 1, 2001.

5\. Stanton, S. "Revised Carbofuran Acute Probabilistic and Chronic
Dietary Exposure Assessments for the Reregistration Eligibility
Decision", Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, September 1, 2005.

6\. Trask J. and Amos, J. "Watershed Regressions for Pesticides (WARP)
Model Estimates for Carbofuran in Illinois Watersheds" Located on EPA
Public Docket as OPP-2005-0162-018 dated as August 15, 2005, FMC
Corporation, Philadelphia, PA.

7\. Blomquist, J. (USGS) and Denis, J. (USGS) Cowles, J. (USEPA),
Hetrick, J. (USEPA), Jones, R.(USEPA), and Birchfield, N. (USEPA)
"Pesticides in Selected Water-Supply Reservoirs and Finished Drinking
Water, 1999-2000: Summary of Results from a Pilot Monitoring
Program,"Open File Report 01-456, Baltimore, MD, 2001.

# TABLES

# Table 1 -- Chemical Input Parameters for Carbofuran

+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| **Parameter**         | Input Value           | Reference             |
+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| Koc (mL/g)            | 30                    | 2                     |
+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| Aerobic soil          | 321                   | 2                     |
| metabolism half-life  |                       |                       |
| (days)                |                       |                       |
+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| Aerobic aquatic       | 642                   | 2                     |
| metabolism half-life  |                       |                       |
| (days)                |                       |                       |
+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| Water solubility      | 700                   | 2                     |
| (mg/L)                |                       |                       |
+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
| Aqueous photolysis    | 6                     | 2                     |
| half-life             |                       |                       |
|                       |                       |                       |
| (days)                |                       |                       |
+-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------+

## 

# Table 2 - Estimated Peak Surface Drinking Water Concentrations for a Single 1 lb ai/A application of Carbofuran Using the FIRST Model

+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| *       | **Appl  | *       | **PCA** | **PCT** | *       | **Es    |
| *Crop** | ication | *Number |         |         | *Applic | timated |
|         | Rate**  | of      | **Adjus | **Adjus | ation** | C       |
|         |         | Applica | tment** | tment** |         | oncentr |
|         | **(lb   | tions** |         |         | **Pa    | ation** |
|         | ai/A)** |         |         |         | ttern** |         |
|         |         |         |         |         |         | **      |
|         |         |         |         |         |         | (ppb)** |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Corn^1^ | 1       | 1       | 0.46    | 0.009   | aerial  | 0.4     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Corn    | 1       | 1       | 0.46    | 0.009   | ground  | 0.4     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Corn    | 1       | 1       | 0.46    | 0.009   | in      | 0.2     |
|         |         |         |         |         | -furrow |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Alf     | 1       | 1       | 0.46 to | 0.009   | aerial  | 0.4 to  |
| alfa^2^ |         |         | 0.56    |         |         | 0.5     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Alfala  | 1       | 1       | 0.46 to | 0.009   | ground  | 0.4 to  |
|         |         |         | 0.56    |         |         | 0.5     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Alfalfa | 1       | 1       | 0.46 to | 0.009   | in      | 0.2     |
|         |         |         | 0.56    |         | -furrow |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Sor     | 1       | 1       | 0.67    | 0.009   | aerial  | 0.6     |
| ghum^3^ |         |         |         |         |         |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Sorghum | 1       | 1       | 0.67    | 0.009   | ground  | 0.6     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Sorghum | 1       | 1       | 0.67    | 0.009   | in      | 0.3     |
|         |         |         |         |         | -furrow |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Co      | 1       | 1       | 0.20    | 0.05    | aerial  | 1.0     |
| tton^4^ |         |         |         |         |         |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Cotton  | 1       | 1       | 0.20    | 0.05    | ground  | 1.0     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Cotton  | 1       | 1       | 0.20    | 0.05    | in      | 0.5     |
|         |         |         |         |         | -furrow |         |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| Pota    | 1       | 1       | 0.14 to | 0.10    | aerial  | 1.0 to  |
| toes^5^ |         |         | 0.63    |         |         | 6.0     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| P       | 1       | 1       | 0.14 to | 0.10    | ground  | 1.0 to  |
| otatoes |         |         | 0.63    |         |         | 6.0     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
| P       | 1       | 1       | 0.14 to | 0.10    | in      | 0.5 to  |
| otatoes |         |         | 0.63    |         | -furrow | 3.0     |
+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+

#  APPENDIX 1 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to Corn or PA Alfalfa

**[Aerial Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 1 FOR carbofuran ON corn \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 AERIAL(16.0) .4 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

412.766 200.252

**[Ground Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 2 FOR carbofuran ON corn \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GROUND( 6.4) .4 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

413.405 200.391

**[In-Furrow Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 3 FOR carbofuran ON corn \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GRANUL( .0) .4 2.0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

203.523 98.599

# APPENDIX 2 - FIRST Ouput Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to CA alfalfa

**[Aerial Application]{.underline}**

> RUN No. 1 FOR carbofuran ON alfalfa \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 AERIAL(16.0) .5 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

503.373 244.209

**[Ground Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 2 FOR carbofuran ON alfalfa \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GROUND( 6.4) .5 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

504.152 244.379

**[In-Furrow Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 3 FOR carbofuran ON alfalfa \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GRANUL( .0) .5 2.0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

248.199 120.242

# APPENDIX 3 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to TX Sorghum

**[Aerial Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 1 FOR carbofuran ON sorghum \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 AERIAL(16.0) .6 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

604.047 293.051

**[Ground Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 2 FOR carbofuran ON sorghum \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GROUND( 6.4) .6 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

604.982 293.255

**[In-furrow Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 3 FOR carbofuran ON sorghum \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GRANUL( .0) .6 2.0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

297.839 144.291

# APPENDIX 4 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to Cotton Nationwide

# 

**[Aerial Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 1 FOR carbofuran ON cotton \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 AERIAL(16.0) 1.0 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

# 

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.007 .488

**[Ground Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 2 FOR carbofuran ON cotton \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GROUND( 6.4) 1.0 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.008 .489

**[In-Furrow Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 3 FOR carbofuran ON cotton \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GRANUL( .0) 1.0 2.0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

496.398 240.484

# APPENDIX 5 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to ME Potato

#  Aerial Application

RUN No. 1 FOR carbofuran ON potato \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 AERIAL(16.0) 1.0 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.007 .488

**[Ground Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 2 FOR carbofuran ON potato \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GROUND( 6.4) 1.0 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.008 .489

**[In-Furrow Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 3 FOR carbofuran ON potato \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GRANUL( .0) 1.0 2.0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (NANOGRAMS/LITER (PPTr)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

496.398 240.484

# APPENDIX 6 - FIRST Output Files for a Single 1 lb ai/A application to ID Potato

**[Aerial Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 1 FOR carbofuran ON potato \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 AERIAL(16.0) 6.0 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

6.040 2.931

**[Ground Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 2 FOR carbofuran ON potato \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GROUND( 6.4) 6.0 .0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

6.050 2.933

**[In-furrow Application]{.underline}**

RUN No. 3 FOR carbofuran ON potato \* INPUT VALUES \*

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RATE (#/AC) No.APPS & SOIL SOLUBIL APPL TYPE %CROPPED INCORP

ONE(MULT) INTERVAL Koc (PPM ) (%DRIFT) AREA (IN)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

1.000( 1.000) 1 1 30.0 700.0 GRANUL( .0) 6.0 2.0

FIELD AND RESERVOIR HALFLIFE VALUES (DAYS)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

METABOLIC DAYS UNTIL HYDROLYSIS PHOTOLYSIS METABOLIC COMBINED

(FIELD) RAIN/RUNOFF (RESERVOIR) (RES.-EFF) (RESER.) (RESER.)

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

321.00 2 N/A 6.00- 744.00 642.00 344.62

UNTREATED WATER CONC (MICROGRAMS/LITER (PPB)) Ver 1.0 MAY 16, 2001

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

PEAK DAY (ACUTE) ANNUAL AVERAGE (CHRONIC)

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

2.978 1.443