+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| **Monitoring  | **Status of APR Data/SPP        | **OSEP            |
| Priorities    | Revision Issues**               | Analysis/Next     |
| and           |                                 | Steps**           |
| Indicators**  |                                 |                   |
+===============+=================================+===================+
| 1.  Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
|     of        | data for this indicator are     | reported that     |
|     infants   | 81.5%. These data represent     | noncompliance     |
|     and       | progress from the FFY 2005 data | identified in FFY |
|     toddlers  | of 69%.                         | 2005 with the     |
|     with      |                                 | timely service    |
|     IFSPs who | The State did not meet its FFY  | provision         |
|     receive   | 2006 target of 100%.            | requirements in   |
|     the early |                                 | 34 CFR            |
|               | The State reported that 137 of  | §§303.340(c),     |
|  intervention | 139 findings of noncompliance   | 303.342(e) and    |
|     services  | identified in FFY 2005 related  | 303.344(f)(1) was |
|     on their  | to this indicator were          | corrected.        |
|     IFSPs in  | corrected in a timely manner,   |                   |
|     a timely  | and the remaining findings were | The State must    |
|     manner.   | corrected by July 1, 2007.      | review its        |
|               |                                 | improvement       |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | activities and    |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | revise them, if   |
|               |                                 | appropriate, to   |
|               |                                 | ensure they will  |
|               |                                 | enable the State  |
|               |                                 | to provide data   |
|               |                                 | in the FFY 2007   |
|               |                                 | APR, due February |
|               |                                 | 1, 2009,          |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | that the State is |
|               |                                 | in compliance     |
|               |                                 | with the timely   |
|               |                                 | service provision |
|               |                                 | requirements in   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR            |
|               |                                 | §§303.340(c),     |
|               |                                 | 303.342(e) and    |
|               |                                 | 303.344(f)(1),    |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 2.  Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State's       |
|     of        | data for this indicator are     | actual target     |
|     infants   | 97.4%.                          | data for          |
|     and       |                                 | provision of      |
|     toddlers  | The State's data reflect a high | services to       |
|     with      | level of performance for this   | infants and       |
|     IFSPs who | indicator.                      | toddlers in       |
|     primarily |                                 | natural           |
|     receive   | The State met its FFY 2006      | environments are  |
|     early     | target of 95%.                  | at or greater     |
|               |                                 | than 95%. There   |
|  intervention |                                 | is no expectation |
|     services  |                                 | that an increase  |
|     in the    |                                 | in that           |
|     home or   |                                 | percentage is     |
|     programs  |                                 | necessary. OSEP   |
|     for       |                                 | appreciates the   |
|     typically |                                 | State's efforts   |
|               |                                 | to improve        |
|    developing |                                 | performance and   |
|     children. |                                 | expects that the  |
|               |                                 | State is          |
| \[Results     |                                 | monitoring to     |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | ensure that IFSP  |
|               |                                 | teams are making  |
|               |                                 | service setting   |
|               |                                 | decisions on an   |
|               |                                 | individualized    |
|               |                                 | basis and in      |
|               |                                 | compliance with   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR §§303.12,  |
|               |                                 | 303.18, and       |
|               |                                 | 3                 |
|               |                                 | 03.344(d)(1)(ii). |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 3.  Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
|     of        | progress data for this          | reported the      |
|     infants   | indicator are:                  | required progress |
|     and       |                                 | data and          |
|     toddlers  | <table>                         | improvement       |
|     with      | <colgroup>                      | activities. The   |
|     IFSPs who | <col style="width: 58%" />      | State must        |
|               | <col style="width: 13%" />      | provide progress  |
|   demonstrate | <col style="width: 13%" />      | data with the FFY |
|     improved: | <col style="width: 13%" />      | 2007 APR, due     |
|               | </colgroup>                     | February 1,       |
| A. Positive   | <thead>                         | 2009**,** and     |
| soc           | <tr class="header">             | baseline data and |
| ial-emotional | <th>06-07 Infant and Toddler    | targets with the  |
| skills        | Outcome Progress Data</th>      | FFY 2008 APR, due |
| (including    | <th><blockquote>                | February 1, 2010. |
| social        | <p>Social</p>                   |                   |
| re            | <p>Emotional</p>                |                   |
| lationships); | </blockquote></th>              |                   |
|               | <th><blockquote>                |                   |
| B.            | <p>Knowledge</p>                |                   |
| Acquisition   | <p>&amp; Skills</p>             |                   |
| and use of    | </blockquote></th>              |                   |
| knowledge and | <th><blockquote>                |                   |
| skills        | <p>Appropriate Behavior</p>     |                   |
| (including    | </blockquote></th>              |                   |
| early         | </tr>                           |                   |
| language/     | </thead>                        |                   |
| co            | <tbody>                         |                   |
| mmunication); | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
| and           | <td>a. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who did not improve    |                   |
| C. Use of     | functioning.</td>               |                   |
| appropriate   | <td>0%</td>                     |                   |
| behaviors to  | <td>0%</td>                     |                   |
| meet their    | <td>0%</td>                     |                   |
| needs.        | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="even">               |                   |
| \[Results     | <td>b. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
| Indicator;    | toddlers who improved but not   |                   |
| New\]         | sufficient to move nearer to    |                   |
|               | functioning comparable to       |                   |
|               | same-aged peers.</td>           |                   |
|               | <td>16.3%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>6.1%</td>                   |                   |
|               | <td>51.0%</td>                  |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
|               | <td>c. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who improved to a      |                   |
|               | level nearer to same-aged       |                   |
|               | peers but did not reach         |                   |
|               | it.</td>                        |                   |
|               | <td>51.0%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>71.4%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>26.5%</td>                  |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="even">               |                   |
|               | <td>d. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who improved           |                   |
|               | functioning to reach a level    |                   |
|               | comparable to same-aged         |                   |
|               | peers.</td>                     |                   |
|               | <td>14.3%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>20.4%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>18.4%</td>                  |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
|               | <td>e. % of infant &amp;        |                   |
|               | toddlers who maintained         |                   |
|               | functioning at a level          |                   |
|               | comparable to same-aged         |                   |
|               | peers.</td>                     |                   |
|               | <td>18.4%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>2.0%</td>                   |                   |
|               | <td>4.1%</td>                   |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | </tbody>                        |                   |
|               | </table>                        |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               | The State provided improvement  |                   |
|               | activities for this indicator   |                   |
|               | covering the remaining years of |                   |
|               | the SPP.                        |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 4\. Percent   | The State revised one           | OSEP appreciates  |
| of families   | improvement activity for this   | the State's       |
| participating | indicator, and the baseline for | efforts to        |
| in Part C who | Indicator 4C, in its SPP and    | improve           |
| report that   | OSEP accepts those revisions.   | performance and   |
| early         |                                 | looks forward to  |
| intervention  | The State's reported data for   | the State's data  |
| services have | this indicator are:             | demonstrating     |
| helped the    |                                 | improvement in    |
| family:       | <table>                         | performance in    |
|               | <colgroup>                      | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| A. Know their | <col style="width: 55%" />      | due February 1,   |
| rights;       | <col style="width: 12%" />      | 2009.             |
|               | <col style="width: 12%" />      |                   |
| B.            | <col style="width: 18%" />      |                   |
| Effectively   | </colgroup>                     |                   |
| communicate   | <tbody>                         |                   |
| their         | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
| children\'s   | <td></td>                       |                   |
| needs; and    | <td>FFY 2005 Data</td>          |                   |
|               | <td>FFY 2006 Data</td>          |                   |
| C. Help their | <td><p>FFY</p>                  |                   |
| children      | <p>2006</p>                     |                   |
| develop and   | <p>Target</p></td>              |                   |
| learn.        | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="even">               |                   |
| \[Results     | <td>A. Know their               |                   |
| Indicator\]   | rights.</td>                    |                   |
|               | <td>93.5%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>92.3%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>95%</td>                    |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="odd">                |                   |
|               | <td> B. Effectively             |                   |
|               | communicate their children’s    |                   |
|               | needs.</td>                     |                   |
|               | <td>95.6%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>95.6%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>95%</td>                    |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | <tr class="even">               |                   |
|               | <td> C. Help their children     |                   |
|               | develop and learn.</td>         |                   |
|               | <td><p>98.2%</p>                |                   |
|               | <p>revised</p></td>             |                   |
|               | <td>96.3%</td>                  |                   |
|               | <td>95%</td>                    |                   |
|               | </tr>                           |                   |
|               | </tbody>                        |                   |
|               | </table>                        |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               | These data represent slippage   |                   |
|               | for Indicators 4A and 4C, and   |                   |
|               | remain unchanged for Indicator  |                   |
|               | 4B, from the FFY 2005 data.     |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               | The State met its FFY 2006      |                   |
|               | targets for Indicators 4B and   |                   |
|               | 4C, and did not meet its target |                   |
|               | for Indicator 4A.               |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               | The State collected FFY 2006    |                   |
|               | data using both census and      |                   |
|               | sampling methodologies, and     |                   |
|               | concluded that data collected   |                   |
|               | using a census methodology      |                   |
|               | yield valid and reliable data.  |                   |
|               | It is OSEP's understanding that |                   |
|               | in the future the State will    |                   |
|               | continue to use census rather   |                   |
|               | than sampling to collect the    |                   |
|               | data for this indicator.        |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 5\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | OSEP looks        |
| of infants    | data for this indicator are     | forward to the    |
| and toddlers  | .64%. These data represent      | State's data      |
| birth to 1    | slippage from the FFY 2005 data | demonstrating     |
| with IFSPs    | of .71%.                        | improvement in    |
| compared to:  |                                 | performance in    |
|               | The State did not meet its FFY  | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| A. Other      | 2006 target of .73%.            | due February 1,   |
| States with   |                                 | 2009.             |
| similar       |                                 |                   |
| eligibility   |                                 |                   |
| definitions;  |                                 |                   |
| and           |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| B. National   |                                 |                   |
| data.         |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 6\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | OSEP looks        |
| of infants    | data for this indicator are     | forward to the    |
| and toddlers  | 1.37%. These data represent     | State's data      |
| birth to 3    | slippage from the FFY 2005 data | demonstrating     |
| with IFSPs    | of 1.48%.                       | improvement in    |
| compared to:  |                                 | performance in    |
|               | The State did not meet its FFY  | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| A. Other      | 2006 target of 1.57%.           | due February 1,   |
| States with   |                                 | 2009.             |
| similar       |                                 |                   |
| eligibility   |                                 |                   |
| definitions;  |                                 |                   |
| and           |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| B. National   |                                 |                   |
| data.         |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 7\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
| of eligible   | data for this indicator are     | reported that     |
| infants and   | 95.1%. These data represent     | noncompliance     |
| toddlers with | progress from the FFY 2005 data | identified in FFY |
| IFSPs for     | of 90.9%.                       | 2005 with the     |
| whom an       |                                 | 45-day timeline   |
| evaluation    | The State did not meet its FFY  | requirements in   |
| and           | 2006 target of 100%.            | 34 CFR            |
| assessment    |                                 | §§303.321(e)(2),  |
| and an        | The State reported that the one | 303.322(e)(1),    |
| initial IFSP  | finding of noncompliance        | and 303.342 was   |
| meeting were  | identified in FFY 2005 was      | corrected in a    |
| conducted     | corrected in a timely manner.   | timely manner.    |
| within Part   |                                 |                   |
| C's 45-day    |                                 | OSEP appreciates  |
| timeline.     |                                 | the State's       |
|               |                                 | efforts and looks |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | forward to        |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | reviewing in the  |
|               |                                 | FFY 2007 APR, due |
|               |                                 | February 1, 2009, |
|               |                                 | the State's data  |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | that it is in     |
|               |                                 | compliance with   |
|               |                                 | the requirements  |
|               |                                 | in 34 CFR         |
|               |                                 | §§303.321(e)(2),  |
|               |                                 | 303.322(e)(1),    |
|               |                                 | and 303.342,      |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
| of all        | data for this indicator are     | reported that     |
| children      | 92.7%. These data represent     | noncompliance     |
| exiting Part  | progress from the FFY 2005 data | identified in FFY |
| C who         | of 60.1%.                       | 2005 with the     |
| received      |                                 | IFSP transition   |
| timely        | The State did not meet its FFY  | content           |
| transition    | 2006 target of 100%.            | requirements in   |
| planning to   |                                 | 34 CFR            |
| support the   | The State reported that 20 of   | §§303.148(b)(4)   |
| child's       | 22 findings of noncompliance    | and 303.344(h)    |
| transition to | identified in FFY 2005 were     | was corrected.    |
| preschool and | corrected in a timely manner,   |                   |
| other         | and the remaining findings were | The State must    |
| appropriate   | corrected by July 1, 2007.      | review its        |
| community     |                                 | improvement       |
| services by   |                                 | activities and    |
| their third   |                                 | revise them, if   |
| birthday      |                                 | appropriate, to   |
| including:    |                                 | ensure they will  |
|               |                                 | enable the State  |
| A. IFSPs with |                                 | to provide data   |
| transition    |                                 | in the FFY 2007   |
| steps and     |                                 | APR, due February |
| services;     |                                 | 1, 2009,          |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | that the State is |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | in compliance     |
|               |                                 | with the          |
|               |                                 | requirements in   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR            |
|               |                                 | §§303.148(b)(4)   |
|               |                                 | and 303.344(h),   |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
| of all        | data for this indicator are     | reported that     |
| children      | 90.9%. These data represent     | noncompliance     |
| exiting Part  | progress from the FFY 2005 data | identified in FFY |
| C who         | of 64%.                         | 2005 with the LEA |
| received      |                                 | notification      |
| timely        | The State did not meet its FFY  | requirements in   |
| transition    | 2006 target of 100%.            | 34 CFR            |
| planning to   |                                 | §303.148(b)(1)    |
| support the   | The State reported that 38 of   | was corrected.    |
| child's       | 44 findings of noncompliance    |                   |
| transition to | identified in FFY 2005 were     | The State must    |
| preschool and | corrected in a timely manner,   | review its        |
| other         | and the remaining findings were | improvement       |
| appropriate   | corrected by July 1, 2007.      | activities and    |
| community     |                                 | revise them, if   |
| services by   |                                 | appropriate, to   |
| their third   |                                 | ensure they will  |
| birthday      |                                 | enable the State  |
| including:    |                                 | to provide data   |
|               |                                 | in the FFY 2007   |
| B.            |                                 | APR, due February |
| Notification  |                                 | 1, 2009,          |
| to LEA, if    |                                 | demonstrating     |
| child         |                                 | that the State is |
| potentially   |                                 | in compliance     |
| eligible for  |                                 | with the          |
| Part B; and   |                                 | requirements in   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR            |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | §303.148(b)(1),   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
| of all        | data for this indicator are     | reported that the |
| children      | 78.1%. These data represent     | remaining         |
| exiting Part  | progress from the FFY 2005 data | noncompliance     |
| C who         | of 57%.                         | identified in FFY |
| received      |                                 | 2004 with the     |
| timely        | The State met its FFY 2006      | timely transition |
| transition    | target of 100%.                 | conference        |
| planning to   |                                 | requirements in   |
| support the   | The State reported that 15 of   | 34 CFR            |
| child's       | 22 findings of noncompliance    | §303.148(b)(2)(i) |
| transition to | identified in FFY 2005 were     | (as modified by   |
| preschool and | corrected in a timely manner,   | IDEA section      |
| other         | and that the remaining findings | 637(a)(9)) was    |
| appropriate   | were corrected by July 1, 2007. | corrected.        |
| community     |                                 |                   |
| services by   |                                 | The State also    |
| their third   |                                 | reported that     |
| birthday      |                                 | noncompliance     |
| including:    |                                 | identified in FFY |
|               |                                 | 2005 with the     |
| C. Transition |                                 | timely transition |
| conference,   |                                 | conference        |
| if child      |                                 | requirements was  |
| potentially   |                                 | corrected.        |
| eligible for  |                                 |                   |
| Part B.       |                                 | The State must    |
|               |                                 | review its        |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | improvement       |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | activities and    |
|               |                                 | revise them, if   |
|               |                                 | appropriate, to   |
|               |                                 | ensure they will  |
|               |                                 | enable the State  |
|               |                                 | to provide data   |
|               |                                 | in the FFY 2007   |
|               |                                 | APR, due February |
|               |                                 | 1, 2009,          |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | that the State is |
|               |                                 | in compliance     |
|               |                                 | with the          |
|               |                                 | requirements in   |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR            |
|               |                                 | §303.148(b)(2)(i) |
|               |                                 | (as modified by   |
|               |                                 | IDEA section      |
|               |                                 | 637(a)(9)),       |
|               |                                 | including         |
|               |                                 | reporting         |
|               |                                 | correction of the |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in the |
|               |                                 | FFY 2006 APR.     |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 9\. General   | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | The State         |
| supervision   | data for this indicator are     | reported that the |
| system        | 92.4%. These data represent     | remaining         |
| (including    | slippage from the FFY 2005 data | noncompliance     |
| monitoring,   | of 95.5%.                       | identified in FFY |
| complaints,   |                                 | 2004 was          |
| hearings,     | The State did not meet its FFY  | corrected. The    |
| etc.)         | 2006 target of 100%.            | State also        |
| identifies    |                                 | reported that     |
| and corrects  | The State reported that all     | noncompliance     |
| noncompliance | remaining FFY 2005 findings     | identified in FFY |
| as soon as    | were corrected by July 2007.    | 2005 was          |
| possible but  |                                 | corrected. OSEP   |
| in no case    |                                 | appreciates the   |
| later than    |                                 | State's efforts   |
| one year from |                                 | and looks forward |
| id            |                                 | to reviewing in   |
| entification. |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
|               |                                 | due February 1,   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 | 2009, the State's |
| Indicator\]   |                                 | data              |
|               |                                 | demonstrating     |
|               |                                 | that the State    |
|               |                                 | timely corrected  |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in FFY |
|               |                                 | 2006 (2006-2007)  |
|               |                                 | under this        |
|               |                                 | indicator in      |
|               |                                 | accordance with   |
|               |                                 | IDEA section      |
|               |                                 | 635(a)(10)(A) and |
|               |                                 | 34 CFR §303.501.  |
|               |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 | In addition, in   |
|               |                                 | responding to     |
|               |                                 | Indicators 1, 7,  |
|               |                                 | 8A, 8B, and 8C    |
|               |                                 | the State must    |
|               |                                 | specifically      |
|               |                                 | identify and      |
|               |                                 | address the       |
|               |                                 | noncompliance     |
|               |                                 | identified in     |
|               |                                 | this table under  |
|               |                                 | those indicators. |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 10\. Percent  | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | OSEP appreciates  |
| of signed     | data for this indicator are     | the State's       |
| written       | 100%. These data are based on   | efforts in        |
| complaints    | three complaints. These data    | achieving         |
| with reports  | remain unchanged from the FFY   | compliance with   |
| issued that   | 2005 data of 100%.              | the timely        |
| were resolved |                                 | complaint         |
| within 60-day | The State met its FFY 2006      | resolution        |
| timeline or a | target of 100%.                 | requirements in   |
| timeline      |                                 | 34 CFR §§303.510  |
| extended for  |                                 | through 303.512.  |
| exceptional   |                                 |                   |
| circumstances |                                 |                   |
| with respect  |                                 |                   |
| to a          |                                 |                   |
| particular    |                                 |                   |
| complaint.    |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 11\. Percent  | The State reported that there   | OSEP looks        |
| of fully      | were no fully adjudicated due   | forward to        |
| adjudicated   | process hearing requests during | reviewing the     |
| due process   | the reporting period.           | State's data in   |
| hearing       |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| requests that |                                 | due February 1,   |
| were fully    |                                 | 2009.             |
| adjudicated   |                                 |                   |
| within the    |                                 |                   |
| applicable    |                                 |                   |
| timeline.     |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 12\. Percent  | Not applicable.                 | This indicator    |
| of hearing    |                                 | does not apply to |
| requests that |                                 | the State because |
| went to       |                                 | the State has not |
| resolution    |                                 | adopted the Part  |
| sessions that |                                 | B due process     |
| were resolved |                                 | procedures.       |
| through       |                                 |                   |
| resolution    |                                 |                   |
| session       |                                 |                   |
| settlement    |                                 |                   |
| agreements    |                                 |                   |
| (applicable   |                                 |                   |
| if Part B due |                                 |                   |
| process       |                                 |                   |
| procedures    |                                 |                   |
| are adopted). |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 13\. Percent  | The State reported that no      | OSEP looks        |
| of mediations | mediations were held during the | forward to        |
| held that     | reporting period.               | reviewing the     |
| resulted in   |                                 | State's data in   |
| mediation     |                                 | the FFY 2007 APR, |
| agreements.   |                                 | due February 1,   |
|               |                                 | 2009.             |
| \[Results     |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+
| 14\. State    | The State's FFY 2006 reported   | OSEP appreciates  |
| reported data | data for this indicator are     | the State's       |
| (618 and      | 100%.                           | efforts in        |
| State         |                                 | achieving         |
| Performance   | The State met its FFY 2006      | compliance with   |
| Plan and      | target of 100%.                 | sections 616,     |
| Annual        |                                 | 618, and 642 and  |
| Performance   |                                 | 34 CFR §§76.720   |
| Report) are   |                                 | and 303.540.      |
| timely and    |                                 |                   |
| accurate.     |                                 |                   |
|               |                                 |                   |
| \[Compliance  |                                 |                   |
| Indicator\]   |                                 |                   |
+---------------+---------------------------------+-------------------+