+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| **Monitoring  | **Status of APR Data/SPP       | **OSEP             |
| Priorities    | Revision Issues**              | Analysis/Next      |
| and           |                                | Steps**            |
| Indicators**  |                                |                    |
+===============+================================+====================+
| 1.  Percent   | The State revised the          | The State must     |
|     of        | improvement activities for     | report, in the FFY |
|     infants   | this indicator in its SPP and  | 2007 APR, due      |
|     and       | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | February 1, 2009,  |
|     toddlers  |                                | on the correction  |
|     with      | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | of the remaining   |
|     IFSPs who | data for this indicator are    | four FFY 2005      |
|     receive   | 81%. These data represent      | findings of        |
|     the early | progress from the FFY 2005     | noncompliance with |
|               | data of 72%.                   | the timely service |
|  intervention |                                | provision          |
|     services  | The State did not meet its FFY | requirements in 34 |
|     on their  | 2006 target of 100%.           | CFR §§303.340(c),  |
|     IFSPs in  |                                | 303.342(e) and     |
|     a timely  | The State reported on page 58  | 303.344(f)(1).     |
|     manner.   | of its FFY 2006 APR that it    |                    |
|               | timely corrected 42 of 46      | The State must     |
| \[Compliance  | findings of noncompliance      | review its         |
| Indicator\]   | identified during FFY 2005 (on | improvement        |
|               | 7/29/05) under this indicator. | activities and     |
|               | The State did not report on    | revise them, if    |
|               | any enforcement or             | appropriate, to    |
|               | program-specific follow-up     | ensure they will   |
|               | activities for the four        | enable the State   |
|               | outstanding FFY 2005 findings. | to provide data in |
|               |                                | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
|               |                                | due February 1,    |
|               |                                | 2009,              |
|               |                                | demonstrating that |
|               |                                | the State is in    |
|               |                                | compliance with    |
|               |                                | the timely service |
|               |                                | provision          |
|               |                                | requirements in 34 |
|               |                                | CFR §§303.340(c),  |
|               |                                | 303.342(e) and     |
|               |                                | 303.344(f)(1),     |
|               |                                | including          |
|               |                                | reporting          |
|               |                                | correction of the  |
|               |                                | noncompliance      |
|               |                                | identified in the  |
|               |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 2.  Percent   | The State revised the          | The State's actual |
|     of        | improvement activities for     | target data for    |
|     infants   | this indicator in its SPP and  | provision of       |
|     and       | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | services to        |
|     toddlers  |                                | infants and        |
|     with      | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | toddlers in        |
|     IFSPs who | data for this indicator are    | natural            |
|     primarily | 99%.                           | environments are   |
|     receive   |                                | at or greater than |
|     early     | The State met its FFY 2006     | 95%. There is no   |
|               | target of 98.425%.             | expectation that   |
|  intervention |                                | an increase in     |
|     services  |                                | that percentage is |
|     in the    |                                | necessary. OSEP    |
|     home or   |                                | appreciates the    |
|     programs  |                                | State's efforts to |
|     for       |                                | improve            |
|     typically |                                | performance and    |
|               |                                | expects that the   |
|    developing |                                | State is           |
|     children. |                                | monitoring to      |
|               |                                | ensure that IFSP   |
| \[Results     |                                | teams are making   |
| Indicator\]   |                                | service setting    |
|               |                                | decisions on an    |
|               |                                | individualized     |
|               |                                | basis and in       |
|               |                                | compliance with 34 |
|               |                                | CFR §§303.12,      |
|               |                                | 303.18, and        |
|               |                                | 303.344(d)(1)(ii). |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 3.  Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State reported |
|     of        | progress data for this         | the required       |
|     infants   | indicator are:                 | progress data and  |
|     and       |                                | improvement        |
|     toddlers  | <table>                        | activities. The    |
|     with      | <colgroup>                     | State must provide |
|     IFSPs who | <col style="width: 58%" />     | progress data with |
|               | <col style="width: 13%" />     | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
|   demonstrate | <col style="width: 13%" />     | due February 1,    |
|     improved: | <col style="width: 13%" />     | 2009; and baseline |
|               | </colgroup>                    | data and targets   |
| A. Positive   | <thead>                        | with the FFY 2008  |
| soc           | <tr class="header">            | APR, due February  |
| ial-emotional | <th>06-07 Infant and Toddler   | 1, 2010.           |
| skills        | Outcome Progress Data</th>     |                    |
| (including    | <th><blockquote>               |                    |
| social        | <p>Social</p>                  |                    |
| re            | <p>Emotional</p>               |                    |
| lationships); | </blockquote></th>             |                    |
|               | <th><blockquote>               |                    |
| B.            | <p>Knowledge</p>               |                    |
| Acquisition   | <p>&amp; Skills</p>            |                    |
| and use of    | </blockquote></th>             |                    |
| knowledge and | <th><blockquote>               |                    |
| skills        | <p>Appropriate Behavior</p>    |                    |
| (including    | </blockquote></th>             |                    |
| early         | </tr>                          |                    |
| language/     | </thead>                       |                    |
| co            | <tbody>                        |                    |
| mmunication); | <tr class="odd">               |                    |
| and           | <td>a. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|               | toddlers who did not improve   |                    |
| C. Use of     | functioning.</td>              |                    |
| appropriate   | <td>4.65%</td>                 |                    |
| behaviors to  | <td>0%</td>                    |                    |
| meet their    | <td>0%</td>                    |                    |
| needs.        | </tr>                          |                    |
|               | <tr class="even">              |                    |
| \[Results     | <td>b. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
| Indicator\]   | toddlers who improved but      |                    |
|               | not sufficient to move         |                    |
|               | nearer to functioning          |                    |
|               | comparable to same-aged        |                    |
|               | peers.</td>                    |                    |
|               | <td>11.63%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>18.6%</td>                 |                    |
|               | <td>25.58%</td>                |                    |
|               | </tr>                          |                    |
|               | <tr class="odd">               |                    |
|               | <td>c. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|               | toddlers who improved to a     |                    |
|               | level nearer to same-aged      |                    |
|               | peers but did not reach        |                    |
|               | it.</td>                       |                    |
|               | <td>11.63%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>11.63%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>11.63%</td>                |                    |
|               | </tr>                          |                    |
|               | <tr class="even">              |                    |
|               | <td>d. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|               | toddlers who improved          |                    |
|               | functioning to reach a level   |                    |
|               | comparable to same-aged        |                    |
|               | peers.</td>                    |                    |
|               | <td>37.21%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>27.91%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>27.91%</td>                |                    |
|               | </tr>                          |                    |
|               | <tr class="odd">               |                    |
|               | <td>e. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|               | toddlers who maintained        |                    |
|               | functioning at a level         |                    |
|               | comparable to same-aged        |                    |
|               | peers.</td>                    |                    |
|               | <td>34.88%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>41.86%</td>                |                    |
|               | <td>34.88%</td>                |                    |
|               | </tr>                          |                    |
|               | </tbody>                       |                    |
|               | </table>                       |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
|               | The State provided improvement |                    |
|               | activities for this indicator  |                    |
|               | covering the remaining years   |                    |
|               | of the SPP.                    |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 4\. Percent   | The State revised the          | OSEP appreciates   |
| of families   | improvement activities for     | the State's        |
| participating | this indicator in its SPP and  | efforts to improve |
| in Part C who | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | performance for    |
| report that   |                                | Indicator 4A and   |
| early         | The State's reported data for  | 4B, and looks      |
| intervention  | this indicator are:            | forward to the     |
| services have |                                | State's data       |
| helped the    |   ----------                   | demonstrating      |
| family:       | ----- ------- ------- -------- | improvement in     |
|               |                                | performance for    |
| A. Know their |       FFY     FFY     FFY 2006 | Indicators 4A, 4B  |
| rights;       |                                | and 4C in the FFY  |
|               |         2005    2006    Target | 2007 APR, due      |
| B.            |                                | February 1, 2009.  |
| Effectively   |               Data    Data     |                    |
| communicate   |                                |                    |
| their         |   A. Know                      |                    |
| children\'s   |  their   65.8%   67.2%   65.8% |                    |
| needs; and    |   ri                           |                    |
|               | ghts.                          |                    |
| C. Help their |                                |                    |
| children      |    B. Eff                      |                    |
| develop and   | ectively 61.9%   64.7%   61.9% |                    |
| learn.        |   co                           |                    |
|               | mmunicate                      |                    |
| \[Results     |   th                           |                    |
| Indicator\]   | eir                            |                    |
|               |   ch                           |                    |
|               | ildren's                       |                    |
|               |   ne                           |                    |
|               | eds.                           |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
|               |    C. Hel                      |                    |
|               | p their  77.6%   77.5%   77.6% |                    |
|               |   ch                           |                    |
|               | ildren                         |                    |
|               |   de                           |                    |
|               | velop and                      |                    |
|               |   le                           |                    |
|               | arn.                           |                    |
|               |   ----------                   |                    |
|               | ----- ------- ------- -------- |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
|               | These data represent progress  |                    |
|               | for Indicator 4A and Indicator |                    |
|               | 4B, and slippage for Indicator |                    |
|               | 4C.                            |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
|               | The State met its FFY 2006     |                    |
|               | targets for Indicator 4A and   |                    |
|               | Indicator 4B, and did not meet |                    |
|               | its FFY 2005 target for        |                    |
|               | Indicator 4C.                  |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 5\. Percent   | The State revised the          | OSEP looks forward |
| of infants    | improvement activities for     | to the State's     |
| and toddlers  | this indicator in its SPP and  | data demonstrating |
| birth to 1    | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | improvement in     |
| with IFSPs    |                                | performance in the |
| compared to:  | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|               | data for this indicator are    | February 1, 2009.  |
| A. Other      | .53%. These data represent     |                    |
| States with   | progress from the FFY 2005     |                    |
| similar       | data of .51%.                  |                    |
| eligibility   |                                |                    |
| definitions;  | The State did not meet its FFY |                    |
| and           | 2006 target of .65%.           |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| B. National   |                                |                    |
| data.         |                                |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| \[Results     |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]   |                                |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 6\. Percent   | The State revised the          | OSEP looks forward |
| of infants    | improvement activities for     | to the State's     |
| and toddlers  | this indicator in its SPP and  | data demonstrating |
| birth to 3    | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | improvement in     |
| with IFSPs    |                                | performance in the |
| compared to:  | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|               | data for this indicator are    | February 1, 2009.  |
| A. Other      | 1.78%. These data represent    |                    |
| States with   | progress from the FFY 2005     |                    |
| similar       | data of 1.72%.                 |                    |
| eligibility   |                                |                    |
| definitions;  | The State did not meet its FFY |                    |
| and           | 2006 target of 2.05%.          |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| B. National   |                                |                    |
| data.         |                                |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| \[Results     |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]   |                                |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 7\. Percent   | The State revised the          | The State reported |
| of eligible   | improvement activities for     | that noncompliance |
| infants and   | this indicator in its SPP and  | identified in FFY  |
| toddlers with | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | 2005 with the      |
| IFSPs for     |                                | 45-day timeline    |
| whom an       | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | requirements in 34 |
| evaluation    | data for this indicator are    | CFR                |
| and           | 96%.                           | §§303.321(e)(2),   |
| assessment    |                                | 303.322(e)(1), and |
| and an        | The State did not meet its FFY | 303.342(a) was     |
| initial IFSP  | 2006 target of 100%.           | corrected in a     |
| meeting were  |                                | timely manner.     |
| conducted     | The State reported that 60 of  |                    |
| within Part   | 60 findings of noncompliance   | OSEP appreciates   |
| C's 45-day    | identified in FFY 2005 (on     | the State's        |
| timeline.     | 11/4/05) related to this       | efforts and looks  |
|               | indicator were corrected in a  | forward to         |
| \[Compliance  | timely manner.                 | reviewing in the   |
| Indicator\]   |                                | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|               |                                | February 1, 2009,  |
|               |                                | the State's data   |
|               |                                | demonstrating that |
|               |                                | it is in           |
|               |                                | compliance with    |
|               |                                | the requirements   |
|               |                                | in 34 CFR          |
|               |                                | §§303.321(e)(2),   |
|               |                                | 303.322(e)(1), and |
|               |                                | 303.342(a).        |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State revised improvement  | The State must     |
| of all        | activities for this indicator  | confirm, in the    |
| children      | in its SPP and OSEP accepts    | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
| exiting Part  | those revisions.               | February 1, 2009,  |
| C who         |                                | whether it         |
| received      | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | identified any     |
| timely        | data for this indicator are    | findings in FFY    |
| transition    | 96%. These data represent      | 2005 with the IFSP |
| planning to   | progress from the FFY 2005     | transition content |
| support the   | data of 86%.                   | requirements in 34 |
| child's       |                                | CFR §§303.148(b)   |
| transition to | The State did not meet its FFY | (4) and            |
| preschool and | 2006 target of 100%.           | 303.344(h), and if |
| other         |                                | so, the status of  |
| appropriate   | Although the State reported in | correction of      |
| community     | its FFY 2006 APR that it did   | those findings. In |
| services by   | not make any findings of       | addition, the      |
| their third   | noncompliance related to this  | State must report  |
| birthday      | indicator in FFY 2005, it had  | in the FFY 2007    |
| including:    | reported in its FFY 2005 APR   | APR, due February  |
|               | that 18 of 40 local systems    | 1, 2009, on the    |
| A. IFSPs with | were in noncompliance with the | correction of the  |
| transition    | requirements of this indicator | remaining six      |
| steps and     | in FFY 2005 and that the       | findings from FFY  |
| services;     | one-year timeline for          | 2006 under this    |
|               | correction for these 18        | indicator.         |
| \[Compliance  | systems would not elapse until |                    |
| Indicator\]   | FFY 2007 because the findings  | OSEP appreciates   |
|               | were not made until February   | the State's        |
|               | 2007. The State provided       | efforts and looks  |
|               | updated data that 16 of 22 FFY | forward to         |
|               | 2006 findings of noncompliance | reviewing in the   |
|               | related to this indicator had  | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|               | been corrected as of February  | February 1, 2009,  |
|               | 1, 2008. It is unclear to OSEP | the State's data   |
|               | whether 18 or 22 findings were | demonstrating that |
|               | made in FFY 2006 and the       | it is in           |
|               | number corrected for FFY 2005  | compliance with    |
|               | and FFY 2006.                  | the IFSP           |
|               |                                | transition content |
|               |                                | requirements in 34 |
|               |                                | CFR §§303.148(b)   |
|               |                                | (4) and            |
|               |                                | 303.344(h).        |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State revised the          | The State must     |
| of all        | improvement activities for     | report, in the FFY |
| children      | this indicator in its SPP and  | 2007 APR, due      |
| exiting Part  | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | February 1, 2009,  |
| C who         |                                | on the correction  |
| received      | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | of the remaining   |
| timely        | data for this indicator are    | four findings of   |
| transition    | 93%. These data represent      | noncompliance with |
| planning to   | progress from the FFY 2005     | the LEA            |
| support the   | data of 89%.                   | notification       |
| child's       |                                | requirements in 34 |
| transition to | The State did not meet its FFY | CFR §303.148(b)(1) |
| preschool and | 2006 target of 100%.           | and confirm        |
| other         |                                | whether the        |
| appropriate   | Although the State reported    | correction was     |
| community     | under Indicator 9 of its FFY   | timely by          |
| services by   | 2006 APR that it did not make  | specifying when    |
| their third   | any findings of noncompliance  | the finding was    |
| birthday      | related to this indicator in   | made and when the  |
| including:    | FFY 2005, it had reported in   | noncompliance was  |
|               | its FFY 2005 APR that 12 of 40 | corrected.         |
| B.            | local systems were in          |                    |
| Notification  | noncompliance with the         | The State must     |
| to LEA, if    | requirements of this indicator | review its         |
| child         | in FFY 2005 and that the       | improvement        |
| potentially   | one-year timeline for          | activities and     |
| eligible for  | correction for these 12        | revise them, if    |
| Part B; and   | systems would not elapse until | appropriate, to    |
|               | FFY 2007 because the findings  | ensure they will   |
| \[Compliance  | were not made until February   | enable the State   |
| Indicator\]   | 2007. The State provided       | to provide data in |
|               | updated data that eight of its | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
|               | 12 FFY 2006 findings of        | due February 1,    |
|               | noncompliance related to this  | 2009,              |
|               | indicator had been corrected   | demonstrating that |
|               | as of February 1, 2008.        | the State is in    |
|               |                                | compliance with    |
|               |                                | the requirements   |
|               |                                | in 34 CFR          |
|               |                                | §303.148(b)(1),    |
|               |                                | including          |
|               |                                | reporting          |
|               |                                | correction of the  |
|               |                                | noncompliance      |
|               |                                | identified in the  |
|               |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 8\. Percent   | The State revised the          | The State must     |
| of all        | improvement activities for     | report, in the FFY |
| children      | this indicator in its SPP and  | 2007 APR, due      |
| exiting Part  | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | February 1, 2009,  |
| C who         |                                | on the correction  |
| received      | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | of the remaining   |
| timely        | data for this indicator are    | four findings of   |
| transition    | 95%. These data represent      | noncompliance with |
| planning to   | progress from the FFY 2005     | the timely         |
| support the   | data of 89%.                   | transition         |
| child's       |                                | conference in 34   |
| transition to | The State did not meet its FFY | CFR                |
| preschool and | 2006 target of 100%.           | §303.148(b)(2)(i)  |
| other         |                                | (as modified by    |
| appropriate   | Although the State reported    | IDEA section       |
| community     | under Indicator 9 of its FFY   | 637(a)(9)), and    |
| services by   | 2006 APR that it did not make  | confirm whether    |
| their third   | any findings of noncompliance  | the correction was |
| birthday      | related to this indicator in   | timely by          |
| including:    | FFY 2005, it had reported in   | specifying when    |
|               | its FFY 2005 APR that 21 of 40 | the finding was    |
| C. Transition | local systems were in          | made when the      |
| conference,   | noncompliance with the         | noncompliance was  |
| if child      | requirements of this indicator | corrected.         |
| potentially   | in FFY 2005 and that the       |                    |
| eligible for  | one-year timeline for          | OSEP appreciates   |
| Part B.       | correction for these 21        | the State's        |
|               | systems would not elapse until | efforts and looks  |
| \[Compliance  | FFY 2007 because the findings  | forward to         |
| Indicator\]   | were not made until February   | reviewing in the   |
|               | 2007. The State provided       | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|               | updated data that 17 of 21 FFY | February 1, 2009,  |
|               | 2006 findings of noncompliance | the State's data   |
|               | related to this indicator had  | demonstrating that |
|               | been corrected as of February  | it is in           |
|               | 1, 2008.                       | compliance with    |
|               |                                | the requirements   |
|               |                                | in 34 CFR          |
|               |                                | §303.148(b)(2)(i)  |
|               |                                | (as modified by    |
|               |                                | IDEA section       |
|               |                                | 637(a)(9)).        |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 9\. General   | The State revised the          | The State must     |
| supervision   | improvement activities for     | demonstrate, in    |
| system        | this indicator in its SPP and  | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| (including    | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | due February 1,    |
| monitoring,   |                                | 2009, that the     |
| complaints,   | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | State has          |
| hearings,     | data for this indicator are    | corrected the      |
| etc.)         | 96%, based on the State's      | remaining          |
| identifies    | reporting timely correction of | noncompliance      |
| and corrects  | 102 of 106 FFY 2005 findings   | identified in FFY  |
| noncompliance | of noncompliance, which        | 2005.              |
| as soon as    | represent correction of 60 of  |                    |
| possible but  | 60 findings under Indicator 7  | OSEP appreciates   |
| in no case    | and 42 of 46 findings under    | the State's        |
| later than    | Indicator 1.                   | efforts and looks  |
| one year from |                                | forward to         |
| id            | These data represent progress  | reviewing in the   |
| entification. | from FFY 2005 data of 75%. The | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|               | State did not meet its FFY     | February 1, 2009,  |
| \[Compliance  | 2006 target of 100%.           | the State's data   |
| Indicator\]   |                                | demonstrating that |
|               | The State did not report on    | the State timely   |
|               | any program-specific follow-up | corrected          |
|               | activities related to the four | noncompliance      |
|               | uncorrected findings of        | identified in FFY  |
|               | noncompliance under Indicator  | 2006 (2006-2007)   |
|               | 1.                             | under this         |
|               |                                | indicator in       |
|               | The State provided updated     | accordance with    |
|               | data that 102 of its 106 FFY   | IDEA section       |
|               | 2006 findings of noncompliance | 635(a)(10)(A) and  |
|               | that were identified by the    | 34 CFR §303.501.   |
|               | lead agency in February 2007   |                    |
|               | had been corrected as of       |                    |
|               | February 1, 2008.              |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 10\. Percent  | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | OSEP appreciates   |
| of signed     | data for this indicator are    | the State's        |
| written       | 100%. These data are based on  | efforts in         |
| complaints    | two complaints. These data     | achieving          |
| with reports  | represent progress from the    | compliance with    |
| issued that   | FFY 2005 data of 0%.           | the timely         |
| were resolved |                                | complaint          |
| within 60-day | The State met its FFY 2006     | resolution         |
| timeline or a | target of 100%.                | requirements in 34 |
| timeline      |                                | CFR §§303.510      |
| extended for  |                                | through 303.512.   |
| exceptional   |                                |                    |
| circumstances |                                |                    |
| with respect  |                                |                    |
| to a          |                                |                    |
| particular    |                                |                    |
| complaint.    |                                |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| \[Compliance  |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]   |                                |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 11\. Percent  | The State reported that it did | OSEP looks forward |
| of fully      | not receive any due process    | to reviewing the   |
| adjudicated   | hearing requests during the    | State's data in    |
| due process   | FFY 2006 reporting period.     | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| hearing       |                                | due February 1,    |
| requests that |                                | 2009.              |
| were fully    |                                |                    |
| adjudicated   |                                |                    |
| within the    |                                |                    |
| applicable    |                                |                    |
| timeline.     |                                |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| \[Compliance  |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]   |                                |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 12\. Percent  | Not applicable.                | This indicator     |
| of hearing    |                                | does not apply to  |
| requests that |                                | the State because  |
| went to       |                                | the State has not  |
| resolution    |                                | adopted the Part B |
| sessions that |                                | due process        |
| were resolved |                                | procedures.        |
| through       |                                |                    |
| resolution    |                                |                    |
| session       |                                |                    |
| settlement    |                                |                    |
| agreements    |                                |                    |
| (applicable   |                                |                    |
| if Part B due |                                |                    |
| process       |                                |                    |
| procedures    |                                |                    |
| are adopted). |                                |                    |
|               |                                |                    |
| \[Results     |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]   |                                |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 13\. Percent  | The State reported that no     | OSEP looks forward |
| of mediations | mediations were held during    | to reviewing the   |
| held that     | the FFY 2006 reporting period. | State's data in    |
| resulted in   |                                | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| mediation     |                                | due February 1,    |
| agreements.   |                                | 2009.              |
|               |                                |                    |
| \[Results     |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]   |                                |                    |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 14\. State    | The State revised the          | OSEP appreciates   |
| reported data | improvement activities for     | the State's        |
| (618 and      | this indicator in its SPP and  | efforts and looks  |
| State         | OSEP accepts those revisions.  | forward to         |
| Performance   |                                | reviewing in the   |
| Plan and      | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
| Annual        | data for this indicator are    | February 1, 2009,  |
| Performance   | 95.5%.                         | the State's data   |
| Report) are   |                                | demonstrating that |
| timely and    | The State did not meet its FFY | it is in           |
| accurate.     | 2006 target of 100%.           | compliance with    |
|               |                                | the Part C's data  |
| \[Compliance  |                                | reporting          |
| Indicator\]   |                                | requirements in    |
|               |                                | IDEA sections 616, |
|               |                                | 618, and 642 and   |
|               |                                | 34 CFR §§76.720    |
|               |                                | and 303.540.       |
+---------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+