BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
Brief Talking Points: "Norwood OSHA Fairness Package"

1.  **These reforms will lead to improved worker safety by making it
    easier for employers to work voluntarily and proactively with OSHA
    to ensure workplaces are as safe and secure as possible**. None of
    these proposals would have a negative impact on current workplace
    safety and health protections.

2.  **Improving worker safety and health is good for workers and
    enhances competitiveness for employers, especially small businesses
    that are the real engine of economic growth and job creation in
    today's economy.** This OSHA reform package will help create jobs
    and make small businesses more competitive.

3.  **Frivolous litigation diminishes the competitiveness for employers
    both at home and abroad.** This legislative package will reduce
    unnecessary litigation and attorney's fees by ensuring that OSHA
    focuses on real safety and health measures.

4.  **Reducing injury and illness rates are the only measures that
    count.** The GAO study released on March 30 demonstrates that
    cooperation between government and employers have created positive
    results and proven successful in reducing workplace injuries and
    illnesses.

5.  H.R. 2728 creates positive results by restoring some common sense
    and flexibility for small businesses to current OSHA standards that
    are arbitrary and unfair, ensuring appropriate disputes will be
    resolved based on merit rather than legal technicalities.

6.  H.R. 2729 creates positive results by promoting government
    efficiency and ensuring important workplace safety and health cases
    are reviewed in a more timely fashion, improving the current system
    of a judicial inertia that only results in government waste.

7.  H.R. 2730 creates positive results by restoring the original system
    of checks and balances intended by Congress when it enacted the OSHA
    law and ensuring the Occupational Safety and Health Review
    Commission ("the Court"), and not OSHA ("the prosecutor"), would be
    the party who interprets the law and provides an independent review
    of OSHA citations.

8.  H.R. 2731 creates positive results by leveling the playing field and
    reducing unnecessary litigation for small businesses and encouraging
    OSHA to better assess the merits of a case before it brings
    unnecessary enforcement actions to court against small businesses.
# 2 Approach

The JIG began its work in March 2002. From March through May 2002, the
JIG reviewed existing Collection Policy Statements (CPS), the Library
On-Line Acquisition Manual (LOLA M) at
http://lcweb.loc.gov/staff/acq/manual, and existing workflow
documentation. The JIG met with the SO for each format to observe and
document their selection processes. The Selection JIG mapped current
processes and conducted follow-up interviews with the SOs and other
staff to determine how they apply the CPS and acquisition guidelines.
Appendix A contains the documented "as-is" processes.

To develop a new improved process, the JIG identified objectives to
guide their recommendations:

-   Make selection decision on 100 percent of deposits before they leave
    CO \[Decision made by CO with LS assistance\]

-   Maintain an accurate record of CO disposition

-   Allow time and provide capability for searching LC databases for
    additional information on the work before it leaves CO

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Reduce redundant searching and selection activities.

The JIG used these principles to map out new processes. Some formats did
not require much change; others had already undergone review through
other JIG efforts (e.g. the Serials Processing JIG). The JIG consulted
with SOs and other stakeholders when it recommended significant revision
to current selection processes.

The JIG identified where and when selection should take place and who
should perform selection. When necessary, the members mapped new
processes to illustrate the recommendations.

Selection JIG members conducted stakeholder meetings to gauge response
to their recommendations. They met with SOs, the Copyright Acquisition
Division (CAD) chief, CO Examining Division management and supervisors,
and CO Cataloging Division management.
Sample 90-Day Notice to Vacate

(Print on community's official letterhead)

August 14, 1998

Mr. Edward Hawkins

13507 Hucksburg Lane

Shilling, AS 40377

Dear Mr. Hawkins:

As you know, the City of Adversity is purchasing your home located at
1387 Hurricane Way, Adversity, AS 40241. We have been in contact with
you since July 29, 1998, to help you locate and move into suitable
replacement housing, and have referred you to three such units.

*This letter is to notify you that you must vacate your home located at
1387 Hurricane Way, Adversity, AS 40241 within 90 days, by November 15,
1998.* Any property remaining on the premises at the expiration of this
90-day period (November 15, 1998) shall become the property of the City
to dispose of accordingly. We will send you a second notice 30 days
prior to that date as a reminder if necessary.

You are required to continue to pay utilities (for example, electric,
gas, water, etc.) for as long as you remain on the property at 1387
Hurricane Way, Adversity, AS 40241. You also are responsible for the
general upkeep of your home and preserving its present condition for as
long as you remain there.

In addition, you are responsible for insuring your own personal property
and contents of your home, and your own safety and the safety of your
guests. The City shall not be liable for any accidents or damages caused
by the negligence of tenants or their guests.

Your continuing tenancy is conditioned on good and proper conduct during
this 90-day period. Any violations of these conditions are grounds for
immediate eviction.

If you have any questions or need additional assistance to complete your
move, please call me at (111) 711-0670.

Sincerely,

Pat Keach

Community Development Specialist

This page intentionally left blank.
**UNITED STATES OF AMERICA**

**[NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD]{.smallcaps}**

**[OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES]{.smallcaps}**

\* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \*
\* \* \* \* \* \*

# [LYNNE A. OSMUS, \*]{.smallcaps}

[ACTING ADMINISTRATOR]{.smallcaps} \*

Federal Aviation Administration \*

\*

Complainant, \*

\* Docket No.: SE-18494

v\. \*

\*

DEVIN O'DONNELL, \*

\*

Respondent. \*

\*

\* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \*
\* \* \* \* \* \*

**[EMERGENCY NOTICE OF HEARING]{.underline}**

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a hearing on the above-entitled case will
be held before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge at ***U.S.
Bankruptcy Court, 101 West Lombard Street, Courtroom 9-C, 9^th^ Floor***
in the City of ***BALTIMORE, MD*** on the ***26^th^*** day of
***February, 2009*** beginning at ***10:00 a.m.*** of that day.

The parties are expected to be present and to present testimony and
witnesses, if any, in support of their positions. **At the hearing, the
parties shall provide a copy of each exhibit for the Judge's use at the
bench and shall exchange copies of all exhibits they intend to offer
into evidence at the hearing. The Board will not provide copies of
exhibits to parties after the hearing.**

Dated at Washington, DC, this ***13^th^ day of February 2009.***

[\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}

WILLIAM E. FOWLER, JR.

CHIEF JUDGE
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND HARD COPY TO FOLLOW

January 5, 2004

**[COLORADO BULLETIN NO.]{.underline}**: CO-300-04-02 File Code:
300-15-14-8

**[SUBJECT:]{.underline}** LTP -- Clarification of Use of State Cost
List and Components for FY2004

**[TO:]{.underline}** All Colorado NRCS Offices

**[PURPOSE:]{.underline}** To provide instructions on the use of
components in the development of local cost lists for FY2004 Program
activities.

**[EXPIRATION DATE:]{.underline}** September 30, 2004

The current, approved, FY 2004 Colorado State Component List was
provided to you in October to be utilized in developing your local cost
lists for use with FY 2004 cost share program activities. There has been
a significant issue raised in regards to the appropriateness of some
components with certain practice codes.

The current database has been developed to plan valves and
appurtenances, along with other components such as gates, structural
steel, etc., generally utilized with the various Irrigation Water
Conveyance practices (430-DD, HH, etc.) under the Structure for Water
Control practice code number 587 [only]{.underline}. The wording of the
practice standard for Structure for Water Control (587) indicates, "It
does not apply to structural components of irrigation pipelines or to
surface drains or grade-stabilization structures".

John Andrews, State Conservation Engineer, has indicated that the
National Practice Standard is being revised and will no longer contain
that wording. In the interim, an interpretation has been made that
planning these valves, appurtenances, and associated components under
practice code 587 [is allowed]{.underline}. These will be considered as
separate practices and not a "component" of the Irrigation Water
Conveyance (430 practices). It is therefore allowed under the 587
specification.

For FY 2004 activities, you are instructed to plan these valves,
appurtenances, and associated components under practice code 587 and the
actual water conveyance structure under the appropriate 430 practice
standard.

This interpretation is in accordance with NRCS policy and procedure and
will save a significant amount of extra work on the part of employees at
the Field, Area, and State office levels in relation to the cost list
procedures and cost share contract activities.

![](media/image1.jpeg){width="2.5701388888888888in"
height="0.8951388888888889in"}

ALLEN GREEN

State Conservationist

Dist: O

Interdisciplinary Review: ASTC-P \_*[DA]{.underline}*\_\_, SCE
\_*[JA]{.underline}*\_\_, SRC \_\_*[JB]{.underline}*\_

Contract Spec. \_\_*[TD]{.underline}*\_

FINAL:NRCS:RC:APUGA: (720) 544-2821:djw:12/19/03
[Chantilly Area Hotels]{.underline}

Courtyard by Marriott 3935 Centerview Drive 703-709-7100

Chantilly, VA 800-321-2211

Chantilly Townplace Suites 14036 Thunderbolt Place 703-709-0453

Chantilly, VA

Homestead Village Chantilly 4504 Brookfield Corp Dr. 703-263-3361

Chantilly, VA 888-782-9473

Sierra Suites Chantilly 4506 Brookfield Corp Dr 703-263-7200

Chantilly, VA 800-474-3772

Hampton Inn Dulles Airport 4050 Westfax Drive 703-818-8200

Chantilly, VA 800-426-7866

Marriott Hotels (Westfields) 14750 Conference Center Dr 703-818-0300

Chantilly, VA 800-635-5666

Washington Dulles Hilton 13869 Park Center Road 703-478-2900

Herndon, VA 800-774-1500

Fairfield Inn Dulles Chantilly 703-435-1111

800-228-2800

Hyatt Hotel at Fair Lakes 703-818-1234

888-591-1234

Holiday Inn Washington Dulles 703-471-7411

800-HOLIDAY
**Jan will deliver the Democratic Response to President Bush's Weekly
Radio Address to the nation [TOMORROW]{.underline}.**

**DATE:  Saturday, September 1, 2007**

**TIME:  10:06am CST**

**   11:06am EST**

**\
STATIONS:   WBBM 780AM Newsradio (Chicago)**

**                        WTOP 103.5FM (Washington, D.C.)**

**Contact: Peter Karafotas**

**                 (202) 226-6898 Office**

**                 (202) 374-1098 Cell**

***The text and audio of Rep. Schakowsky's speech is embargoed until
after the speech airs on Saturday morning.***

**U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky (IL-09) will be delivering the
Democratic Response to President Bush's Weekly Radio Address to the
nation on Saturday, September 1st. Schakowsky will speak about her
recent trip to Iraq and the need for a new direction for the war in
Iraq.  Schakowsky, who chaired a six-member Congressional delegation to
the region, visited U.S. bases and met with General David Petraeus and
U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker, as well as Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister
Barham Salih.**
March 21, 2005

Hon. Carlos Lopez

President

Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board

P.O. Box 11488

San Juan, Puerto Rico 00910-1488

Dear Mr. Lopez:

I am writing to encourage the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board
(EQB) to initiate the rulemaking process to adopt the pending amendments
to the Puerto Rico Water Quality Standards Regulations (PRWQSR).
Adoption of the antidegradation implementation methods and the pathogens
criteria in these amendments will fulfill EQB=s obligation under section
303(c) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. \'1313(c), and will fully
satisfy the requirements of the federal BEACH Act.

EQB included a commitment in its Fiscal Year 2005 (FY-05) Consolidated
Water Workplan to complete the adoption process, and initiate the
implementation of these amendments. It is our understanding that the
proposed rulemaking package was completed by EQB=s Water Quality Area
several months ago, and has been awaiting final approval by the EQB
Governing Board to allow for the initiation of the public participation
process. It is very important that EQB complete the adoption process as
soon as possible, and submit the final adopted PRWQSR to EPA for review.
To this end, I am requesting that the Governing Board make every effort
to expedite its approval of the proposed rulemaking package.

Please be aware that a certification from the Commonwealth=s Secretary
of Justice is also required under 40 CFR 131.6(e) as part of the final
PRWQSR submission.

EPA Region 2 looks forward to receiving the final adopted PRWQSR for
review and agency action, and to continuing to work with EQB to further
improve the PRWQSR.

If you have any questions, please call me at (212) 637-5000 or have your
staff contact Mr. Walter Mugdan, Director, Division of Environmental
Planning and Protection at (212) 637-3725.

Sincerely,

Kathleen C. Callahan

Acting Regional Administrator

cc: Ruben Gonzalez, PREQB

bcc: Jose Font, CEPD

Carl-Axel Soderberg, CEPD

Walter Mugdan, DEPP

Kevin Bricke, DEPP

Phyllis Feinmark, ORC-WGGL

Nina Dale, ORC-WGGL

Mario Del Vicario, DEPP-CEPB

Felix Locicero, DEPP-CEPB

Wayne Jackson, DEPP-CEPB

**G:\\user\\share\\swqb\\tes\\wqs\\pr\\expedite.prwqs2.wpd**
Low temperature is a predominant characteristic shared by the majority
of the planets and their satellites on our solar system. The Earth is a
predominantly cold environment with 70% of the surface covered by oceans
(4-5º C) and 20% covered by permafrost (continuously frozen soil). An
understanding of how life has evolved to reproduce at low temperatures
could provide insights on the potential habitability of other planets
with similar characteristics. Microorganisms are among the most abundant
and oldest cold-adapted organisms on Earth making them an ideal model to
understand cold adaptation at the genome level. However, a single
microbial genome sequence is not sufficient to establish the importance
of gene evolution and lateral gene transfer on cold adaptation. The
objective of this work was to compare the genome sequences of multiple
*Psychrobacter* species from warm and cold environments to better
understand what genomic features make a microorganism cold adapted.
*Psychrobacter arcticum* 273-4 and *Psychrobacter cryohalolentis* K5 are
two species isolated from Siberian permafrost and Siberian cryopegs,
respectively, and both capable of growth below 0º C. *Psychrobacter*
PRwf-1, which was isolated from the marine fish *Lutjanus vivanu*s in
warm water off the north coast of Puerto Rico, has a minimum growth
temperature of 4° C, but has a temperature maximum 15-20°C higher than
strains 273-4 and K5. PRw-f1 also grows faster than the other strains at
higher temperatures. Preliminary analysis indicates that the G+C content
of PRwf-1, is 2 % higher than the GC content of 273-4 and K5. Sequence
comparisons between the three genomes indicates that amino acid
identities were the lowest between PRw-f1 and 273-4, followed by K5.
Furthermore, some of the amino acid sequences of 273-4 and K5 have
decreased arginine and proline usage when compared to PRwf-1, suggesting
that the proteins encoded were cold adapted. Interestingly, all three
genomes have a significant amount of transposons and insertion sequences
suggesting that in addition to amino acid usage, lateral gene transfers
could have been involved in shaping the genome structure of the genus.
From: Nathaniel Gray \<n8gray@caltech.edu\>\
To: Multiple recipients of list \<voting@nist.gov\>\
Subject: Comments on Electronic Voting\
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)\
X-To: voting@nist.gov

Honorable committee members,

To assure public confidence in any electronic voting scheme, it is clear
that a voter-verifiable paper trail must exist.  Furthermore, this paper
trail must be randomly sampled on election day to audit the veracity of
the electronic results.  This is the \*minimum\* that must be done in
order to establish trustworthiness of a system.

However, America can do better than this for her voters!  One of the
shining merits of American democracy is the way in which its
governmental processes are made transparent to the public at large.  A
prime example of this is my ability to go to

<http://www.vote.nist.gov/HearingsandTranscripts.htm> and download the
transcripts of your very meetings.  By reading these transcripts I can
verify that your meetings are being conducted in an honest and honorable
manner.

The same level of transparency can be applied to software as well! 

Software is written as human-readable \"source code,\" which is
translated by computer (by a process called compilation) into a
computer-readable \"executable.\"  Most software that you buy in stores
today is distributed as executables, which means that you, as a user,
have no idea how it works.  A large number of software developers,
however, have decided instead to give their users access to the source
code of their software \-- such software is known as \"open-source
software,\" and is rapidly growing in volume.  This allows any
sufficiently skilled person to examine the software and report problems
to the author.  The result is that large numbers of people read the code
and problems are found and fixed quickly, leading to more reliable
software.

I would argue that because voting is the \*defining\* \*process\* of
democracy, voting software \*must\* be produced in as transparent and
verifiable a manner as is possible.  The open-source process is ideally
suited to such a task!  In fact, there is a group of open-source
developers who, driven simply by their conscience, have already produced
a prototype of an open-source voting system.  The San Jose Mercury News
even went so far as to call it \"The touch-screen holy grail.\"  You can
find a demonstration of the results of their labor at this URL:

        <http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/>

I would as you, for the sanctity of our democracy, to strongly consider
availability of source code as a necessity for an electronic voting
system.  The voting process is the keystone of democracy \-- if its
integrity is compromised the structure of the nation itself becomes
suspect.  History has shown again and again that sunlight is the best
vaccine against corruption and subversion.  Please let the sun shine on
the democratic process!

Thank you for your time and good work,

-Nathaniel Gray

\--

Nathaniel Gray \-- Caltech Computer Science

Mojave Project \--
[http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu](http://mojave.cs.caltech.edu/)
**Development of RF tools and scenarios for ITER on JET**

J.-M. Noterdaeme, JET-EDFA Task Force H and JET-EFDA Contributors\*

^1^*Max Planck Institute for Plasma physics, EURATOM Association,
Garching, Germany and Gent University, EESA Department, Gent, Belgium*

*\*See J. Paméla, Fusion Energy 2004 (Proc. 20^th^ Int. Conf. Vilamoura
2004) IAEA Vienna, Paper OV1/2*

The focal points of the Task Force H at JET are plasma heating, current
drive and plasma rotation as well as the optimization of the systems. In
the very intense 2003-2004 campaigns, we emphasized in those areas the
development of tools and scenarios for progress towards ITER.

The improvement of LH coupling with local puffing of D~2~ gas, which
made operation at ITER relevant distances (10 cm) and with ELMs a
reality, has been extended to plasmas with higher triangularity \[1\].

The flexibility of the JET ICRF system, the possibility to use tritium,
and the good confinement of energetic particles are key capabilities of
JET and permit the testing of ITER scenarios. The ^3^He minority heating
scenario, a heavy ("inverted") minority scenarios considered for the
non-activated start-up phase of ITER \[2\], heats at low ^3^He
concentrations efficiently the bulk ions. For n~3He~/n~e~ \> 2%, the
scenario transforms to a mode conversion scenario where the electrons
are heated. The D minority heating is not accessible as the
concentration of C^6+^ dominates the wave propagation and always leads
to mode conversion. A third heavy minority scenario, the minority
heating of T, is very effective at producing neutrons. An exotic fusion
reaction (pT) must be taken into account when evaluating neutron rates.

Experimental evidence confirmed the theoretical prediction that, as the
larmor radius increases beyond 0.5 times the perpendicular wavelength of
the wave, the second harmonic acceleration of the ions decreases to very
small levels. This influences strongly the distribution function of the
heated ions. Active destabilization of sawteeth, first stabilized by
fast particles, was demonstrated. The contribution of fast particles
accelerated by ICRF to the plasma rotation was clearly identified, but
it is only a small part of an underlying, and not yet understood,
co-current plasma rotation. Progress was made in the physics of ELMs
while their effect on the ICRF coupling could be minimized with the
conjugate-T matching scheme.

ICRF was developed as a wall conditioning procedure and shown to work
even on a large machine. In contrast to glow discharge cleaning, it can
be used in a machine such as ITER where the magnetic field (of the
superconducting coils) will stay on between discharges. A mixture of
gases (He/H~2~) improved the homogeneity of the glow.

The addition of 3 dB couplers is a step in improving the power
capability of the ICRF heating on JET in ELMy plasmas. The installation

of an ITER-like, ELM resilient antenna in 2006 will further increase
this capability and be a test of the ICRF scheme for ITER.

\[1\] J. Mailloux et al., this conference

\[2\] M.-L. Mayoral et al., this conference

\[3\] A. Lyssoivan et al., this conference
Dear Parent or Guardian:

This year, your child's school will be taking part in a study of
supplemental reading comprehension programs for fifth-grade students.
There are four programs altogether. The goal of the study is to find out
how much these programs improve children's reading skills. The U.S.
Department of Education is sponsoring the study, and it will be carried
out by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., and three other firms that are
well known for their education studies. (Please see the enclosed
brochure for more details on the study.)

Some schools in the study will continue to teach reading using only
their regular curriculum. Other schools will add one of the supplemental
comprehension programs to their regular reading instruction. To decide
which schools will use only their regular program and which will use one
of the four other programs, we will pick school names as you would pick
names in a lottery. If your child's school is chosen for one of the four
reading programs, his or her teacher will be trained to use that program
and will spend about 30 minutes a day teaching reading comprehension
according to that program.

To see how much the reading programs help, we will test your child in
reading three times: at the beginning of the 2006-07 school year, at the
end of that year, and at the end of the 2007-08 school year. During both
years, we will also collect information on your child's attendance and
any extra language or reading help your child may receive. We need this
information even if your child's school uses only its regular reading
program because your child is important to the study either way.

All information on your child will be kept confidential. For example, we
will never refer to students by name. No one---not parents, school
personnel, or anyone else---will be able to get information on your
child, except as required by law, regulation, or court order.

If you do not want your child to take part in the study, please call
Mathematica's toll-free number, 1-888-535-0283, or send a note to your
child's school within the next week. You may mail this note to the
school or give it to your child to take to his or her teacher. ***If you
and your child agree that he or she will be in the study, you do not
need to do anything.*** Even if you do give your consent now, your child
may still withdraw from the study later, without penalty.

If you have any questions about the study of reading comprehension
programs, please contact Dr. Wendy Mansfield, the deputy study director,
at Mathematica's toll-free number, 1-888-535-0283. Thank you in advance
for your help with this important study.

![](media/image1.png){width="1.7916666666666667in"
height="0.9166666666666666in"}

Sincerely,

Dr. David Myers

Study Director
**DA 05-1017**

**Released: April 6, 2005**

**NOTICE OF STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED**

**WC Docket No. 05-61**

The application listed in this notice has been granted pursuant to the
Commission's streamlined procedures for domestic section 214 transfer of
control applications.[^1] The Wireline Competition Bureau has determined
that grant of this application serves the public interest.[^2] For
purposes of computation of time for filing a petition for
reconsideration or application for review, or for judicial review of the
Commission's decision, the date of "public notice" shall be the release
date of this notice.[^3]

1.  Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for Acquisition of Assets of
    ICG Choicecom, L.P., and ICG Telecom Group, Inc. by Tel West Network
    Services Corporation, WC Docket No. 05-61, Public Notice, DA 05-482
    (rel. February 24, 2005).

> **Effective Date of Grant:** 3/27/05

For further information, please contact Tracey Wilson-Parker, at (202)
418-1394 or Terri Natoli, Competition Policy Division, Wireline
Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1574.

**-FCC-**

[^1]: 47 C.F.R. § 63.03.

[^2]: *Implementation of Further Streamlining Measures for Domestic
    Section 214 Authorizations,* CC Docket No. 01-150, Report and Order,
    17 FCC Rcd 5517, 5529, para. 22 (2002).

[^3]: *Id.; see* 47 C.F.R. § 1.4 (Computation of time).
Overview Presentation for the SAVE-IT Program

SAVE-IT

-   SAfety

> \- Countermeasure for reducing distraction crashes

-   VEhicle using

> \- Operating prototype

-   Adaptive

> \- Changing in real time in response to sensor info

-   Interface

> \- Displays and controls

-   Technology

Adaptive Interface for Workload Management

This slide is a visual representation of the three components of
SAVE-IT's adaptive interface for driver workload management. SAVE-IT
will have sensors to assess both the driver's state and what is going on
the road. SAVE-IT will have a customized interface, able to adjust
thresholds dynamically in response to the driving tasks. To intermediate
between the driver state and roadway sensors and the adaptive interface,
SAVE-IT requires real-time software processing to provide output able
reflecting driving requirements as a function of the demands in real
time.

Safety Concern

-   Multiple and more complex devices may increase frequency, duration,
    and level of driver distraction

-   Crash risk=\>secondary task demands x use frequency x driving task
    demands

Goals

-   To develop, demonstrate, and evaluate the ability of SAVE-IT to help
    minimize the safety risk of distraction and enhance crash warning
    system effectiveness

> \- Conduct human factors research
>
> \- Develop operational prototype vehicle

-   Document and disseminate work

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Keep up with worldwide industry interest

-   Provide a basis for possible future guidelines and standards

-   Provide a research road map to extend SAVE-IT functionality

Future Safety Scenario

-   Drivers will be offered an array of advanced technologies that they
    can use while driving

-   Potential problems with multiple devices

> \- Messages presented too close in time
>
> \- Information presented at unsafe times
>
> \- Display complexity increases
>
> \- Priority messages not getting through to driver

-   When multi-tasking, drivers will divert their attention from road to

> \- Glances at displays
>
> \- Operate controls
>
> \- Listen and speak to voice interface
**Reactivation of the Local Bankruptcy Rules Committee**

**United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio**

With the vast changes to the bankruptcy practice arising from the
adoption of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act
of 2005 and the coinciding amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure that are anticipated to be in final format by the end of 2008,
the bankruptcy judges of the Southern District of Ohio have determined
that the time has come to reactivate the Local Rules Committee. The
Local Rules Committee will consider modifications and additions to the
local rules and forms necessary to deal with any gap areas in new laws
and national rules and to create consistency and efficiency in the
practice of law in our bankruptcy courts.

The Local Rules Committee will be divided into subcommittees based on
area of practice. In addition to an executive committee, there will be
subcommittees focused on Chapter 7, Chapter 13, and Chapters 11/15.

Any attorney interested in serving on the Rules Committee may nominate
himself or herself and may nominate other attorneys. Nominations on the
form below must be submitted **[on or before Friday, May 30,
2008]{.underline}** by fax or mail to the following address:

Hon. Lawrence S. Walter

120 West Third Street

Dayton, OH 45402

Fax: 937-225-7504

The bankruptcy judges will select the members of the committee and make
appropriate subcommittee assignments. Bankruptcy expertise is the
primary criterion for selection, but the judges will also seek
geographic and practice diversity. Consequently, debtor attorneys,
creditor attorneys, trustees and law clerks, among others, are all urged
to submit their names for consideration.

**[Nomination Form for Local Rules Committee (please
print)]{.underline}**

Name:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Address:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Phone No.\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Email:\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Area of Practice / Interest (Chapter 7, 11/15 or 13):
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I primarily represent (creditors, debtors,
trustee)\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

I would also like to nominate
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

whose primary practice area is chapter\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ in the city of
\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
**§20.1501 Rule 1501. Definitions.**

For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply:

\(a\) *Initiative* means the Expedited Claims Adjudication Initiative as
promulgated by this subpart.

\(b\) *Participant* means any eligible claimant who elects to
participate in the Initiative by executing, with his or her
representative, an Expedited Claims Adjudication Initiative Agreement
and Waiver of Rights as provided in §20.1503 of this part.

\(c\) *Covered claim or covered claims* means any claim or claims, as
described in §20.1502(c) of this part, that a participant elects to have
processed under the rules governing the Initiative, including any
downstream element of the claim(s), such as assignment of a disability
rating and effective date, and any claim that is inextricably
intertwined with a covered claim.

\(d\) *Representative* means an accredited representative of a
recognized Veterans Service Organization or an accredited attorney or
agent, as set forth in part 14 of this chapter, for whom a claimant has
properly executed and filed a VA Form 21-22, "Appointment of Veterans
Service Organization as Claimant's Representative," or a VA Form 21-22a,
"Appointment of Individual as Claimant's Representative," as required by
§14.631 of this chapter.

\(e\) *Participating VA regional office* means one of the following four
VA regional offices: Nashville, Tennessee; Lincoln, Nebraska; Seattle,
Washington; and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The jurisdiction of the
Nashville, Lincoln, and Seattle regional offices extends to residents of
Tennessee, Nebraska, and Washington, respectively. The jurisdiction of
the Philadelphia regional office extends to residents of the 40
easternmost counties of Pennsylvania and residents of the seven
southernmost counties of New Jersey. For purposes of this Initiative
only, the jurisdiction of these regional offices extends only to a
covered claim, as described in §20.1502(c) of this part. (Authority: 38
U.S.C. 501(a))
PUBLIC NOTICE![](media/image1.png){width="0.6159722222222223in"
height="0.6222222222222222in"}

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12TH STREET, S.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 **DA 99-2495**

News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet:
http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov

**Released: November 9, 1999**

**WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU**

**APPROVES WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION FOR REVIEW AND**

**WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF LICENSE**

On April 5, 1995, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau granted Alvin
B. Asher (Asher) a license for Station WPGQ483, private carrier paging
frequency 929.9625 MHz, File No. 9409680421. On May 5, 1995, Westlink
Licensee Corporation (Westlink) filed a Petition for Reconsideration
(Petition) asking the Bureau to set aside the grant of Asher's license
and dismiss his application as unacceptable for filing. The Bureau
denied Westlink's Petition on June 25, 1996.

On July 25, 1996, Westlink filed (1) an Application for Review of the
Bureau's denial of Westlink's Petition and (2) a Petition for Revocation
of License for Station WPGQ483.

By letter dated November 8, 1999, Arch Communications Group, Inc. (the
successor-in-interest to Westlink) requested that the Commission dismiss
Westlink's Application for Review and its Petition for Revocation of
License, noting that "\[i\]ntervening corporate and industry
developments have rendered the pleadings moot." The Policy and Rules
Branch of the Commercial Wireless Division has reviewed and hereby
approves Arch Communications Group, Inc.'s request to dismiss Westlink
Licensee Corporation's Application for Review and Petition for
Revocation of License, both filed July 25, 1996, File No. 9409680421.

Action by the Chief, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless
Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.

For further information, contact Richard Arsenault at (202) 418-0920,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy
and Rules Branch.
Task Description:

Firm will issue 3 checks to total \$15,510 to cover April 1, 2006 June
30, 2006 to Dr. Panomwat Amornphimoltham from the Faculty of Dentistry
Prince of Songkla University Songkhla, Thailand. Payment to Dr.
Amornphimoltham as Per Diem and Travel expenses during his stay at OPCB:

April 15, - \$5,170, May 15- \$5,170, June 15, 2006- \$5,170

The checks should be sent via express mail to the NIDCR, to the
attention of Mrs. Elizabeth Powell at the following address:

Mrs. Elizabeth Powell

30 Convent Drive Room 211

Building 30

Bethesda, MD 20892-4340

Telephone: 301-496-3595

Fax: 301-402-0823
PARTIES RSVP FOR INDUSTRY DAY

  -------- --------------------------- ------------------- -------------------
  **No**   **COMPANY**                 **CONTACT**         **PHONE**

  1        Consultant                  Robert Easley       281.474.3796

  2        Turbogizmo, LLC             Steven Schwartz     703.625.8510

  3        Air-Lock, Inc.              Mike McCarthy       203.878.4691

  4        PADSOFT, Inc.               Peter Dennett       281-334-3800

  5        Futron, Inc.                Sam Ximines         281.333.0190 x 41

  6        SpaceX                      Jeff Richichi       310.414.6555 c 225

  7        Cisco Systems, Inc.         Hugh Arif           440.343.1452

  8        Marotta Controls, Inc.      Brian Harris        973.334.7800 x 504

  9        David Clark Company         Daniel Barry        508.751.5800

  10       Blackhawk Mgmt Corp         Tom Gaseor          281.204.4438

  11       Honeywell International     Ralph Cacace        602.822.3765

  12       ILC/Dover                   Ron Lawrence        302.335.3911 x 319

  13       Boeing                      Sam Gunderson       713.397.7751

  14       Oceaneering                 Jud Hedgecock       281.228.5409

  15       Astrium Worth America, Inc. Michael Bowker      832.224.4513

  16       Draper Laboratory           Seamus Tuohy        617.258.1407

  17       Wyle E&T                    Jeff Blanchard      832.875.2016

  18       Hamilton Sundstrand         Steve Dionne        860.654.4154

  19       McBarron Consulting         James McBarron II   281.474.4663

  20       JAMSS America, Inc.         Robert Carlson      281.461.3700

  21       IDA Inc.                    Henry Valdez        281.488.8968

  22       Harris Corporation          Joel Howell         321.309.7443

  23       Wolf Engineering, LLC       Karen Murdoch       860.749.2737

  24       Colorado School of Mines    Masami Nakagawa     303.250.1961

  25       QTEC                        David O'Neil        256.883.7994

  26       Raven Aerospace Technology  Richard Patten      281.773.0007
           Inc                                             

  27       Raytheon                    Charles Hill        727.302.2568

  28       Lockheed Martin             Carol Webber        281.283.4224

  29       ZIN Technologies, Inc.      David Hall          216.925.1011

  30       MEI Technologies, Inc.      Barbara Pearson     281.283.6120

  31       Implemetrics, Inc.          Dayle Frazier       281.335.0739

  32       Texas A&M                   Michael Schuller    979.845.8768

  33       United Space Alliance       Jerry Miller        281.282.5706

  34       Bastion Technologies, Inc.  Glen Trobaugh       281.283.9330

  35       S&K technologies            Leisa McLeod        Not Available

  36       MAXD, Inc.                  Don Barker          Not Available

                                                           

                                                           
  -------- --------------------------- ------------------- -------------------
*Map and Directions to 1900 N. Lobdell Avenue, Baton Rouge*

From: 9430 Jackie Cochran Dr Baton Rouge, LA 70807-8020 US (Airport)\
To: 1900 N Lobdell Ave Baton Rouge, LA 70806-1725 US\
**[Driving Directions]{.underline}**\
1. Start out going NORTH on JACKIE COCHRAN DR toward SALLY RIDE DR.
(0.12 miles)\
2. JACKIE COCHRAN DR becomes SALLY RIDE DR. (0.27 miles)\
3. Turn LEFT onto VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD. (0.88 miles)\
4. Turn RIGHT onto HARDING BLVD/LA-408 W. (0.07 miles)\
5. Merge onto I-110 S toward BATON ROUGE. (0.49 miles)\
6. Merge onto AIRLINE HWY/US-190 E/US-61 S via EXIT 5. (4.44 miles)\
7. Merge onto GREENWELL SPRINGS RD/LA-37. (0.27 miles)\
8. Turn LEFT onto WOODDALE BLVD. (0.90 miles)\
9. Turn RIGHT onto TOM DR. (0.27 miles)\
10. Turn RIGHT onto N LOBDELL BLVD/N LOBDELL AVE. (0.26 miles)\
11. End at 1900 N Lobdell Ave Baton Rouge, LA 70806-1725 US\
Total Estimated Time: 14 minutes\
Total Distance: 7.97 miles

![](media/image1.png){width="7.094444444444444in"
height="5.405555555555556in"}
Advanced Memories for Space Applications

John C. Rodgers

BAE SYSTEMS

9300 Wellington Road, Manassas, VA 20110

<john.rodgers@baesystems.com>

Several generations of radiation hardened memory products were developed
to support space applications. Both process technology enhancements and
specialized design techniques were used to overcome the weaknesses of
commercial memories when used in the space environment. The natural
advancement of semiconductor technology was used to progressively
increase density, enhance performance, and reduce power consumption.

Historically, radiation hardened memories for space were fabricated at
specialized foundries to achieve strategic levels of radiation hardness
for both natural space and military applications. These memories are
available under the Qualified Manufacturer Listing (QML) program with Q-
and V-level screening. The demand for higher densities and lower cost,
however, are pushing for design compatibility with state-of-the-art
commercial foundries for 4M SRAM and beyond, and creating a new set of
products targeting natural space. The SRAM will receive the QML
qualification with T-level screening.

For applications requiring large size memories, users had to rely on
commercially available DRAM, repackaged in high-density hermetic
packages. The implementation ranges from 16M DRAM in stacked TSOP and
mounted in hermetic cards, to memory cubes for high-density digital
space recorder applications.

A significant effort was spent on identifying suitable 64M (and beyond)
SDRAM for space flight. Problems encountered were latchup, both
destructive and non-destructive, low total dose tolerance, stuck bits
that limit error correction capability, and significant variability by
manufacturer and product vintage. A commercial 64M SDRAM was finally
identified, and assessment of error rate was made for various orbital
environments. This raises the concern over viability of future
generations of commercial memories in space.

The trend in commercial technology response to space radiation increased
the need for a radiation hardened solution for dense memories. This is
being addressed at BAE SYSTEMS with a program to integrate phase-change
material with radiation hardened CMOS. This chalcogenide based memory
referred to as OUM™ offers the promise of high density, high
performance, low voltage, non-volatility and compatibility with standard
CMOS processing.
**Michael J. Walsh, Ph.D.**

**Senior Vice President**

**Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc.**

Michael J. Walsh is a Senior Vice President of Chicago Climate Exchange,
Inc., a self-regulatory exchange that administers a voluntary greenhouse
reduction and trading program for North America. CCX subsidiaries
administer futures contract markets for sulfur dioxide emission
allowances and manage marketing of products for the European Union
carbon dioxide Emissions Trading Scheme that are traded on the
International Petroleum Exchange. In his prior position with
Environmental Financial Products LLC (the predecessor company to CCX),
Mr. Walsh arranged several international carbon credit transactions,
developed rules for efficient international carbon trading and designed
sustainable forestry and carbon funds. He also served as lead writer for
a series of five technical papers on international emissions trading
prepared for the Government of Canada. He has been a keynote speaker on
environmental markets in over a dozen countries.

Mr. Walsh previously served as a Senior Economist with the Chicago Board
of Trade where he directed the CBOT annual auctions of sulfur dioxide
emission allowances conducted on behalf of the U.S. Environmental
Protection A­gency. Mr. Walsh has also served as a Financial Economist in
the Office of Tax Policy in the U.S. Department of the Treasury and has
been on the faculties of the University of Notre Dame and the Illinois
Institute of Technology. He has been a consultant to the U.S. Agency for
International Development on emissions trading in central Europe and
served on the Florida Air Emissions Trading Commission. Mr. Walsh holds
a Ph.D. in Economics from Michigan State University.
**From:** \"Mike and Robin Fisher\"

**To:** \<LandUseRuleComments@do.usbr.gov\>

**Date:** 8/17/07 11:00PM

**Subject:** 1006‑AA51

To: LandUseRuleComments@do.usbr.gov

Attention: Mr. Richard Rizzi, USBR, Denver Federal Center

Subject: 1006‑AA51

Proposed Rule Revision 43 CFR Part 429

Dear Mr. Rizzi,

My husband\'s family has owned a cabin on Lake Cascade in Idaho

for 35 years. We have enjoyed a boat dock and buoy for 34 years. We have

paid the proper permits for the dock and buoy ever since the time
permits

became a requirement. We are significantly concerned that the proposed
rule

revision 43CFR Part 429 (1006‑AA51) would take away our dock and buoy

permits after they expire, rather than allowing us to renew. There are

hundreds of families who live, vacation, and recreate at Lake Cascade
that

would be impacted by this revision. This is not simply a day‑use lake.

People with investments in homes and cabins visit for days, weekends,
and

weeks at a time. The docks also provide a benefit to the public on Lake

Cascade as they are available to the public for safety, rescue, or in
the

case of an emergency.

Without dock and buoy permits, the value of homes and cabins

would decline, not to mention the enjoyment and convenience of living on
the

lake. Also, has the Bureau of Reclamation considered the investment that

owners have made in their docks? We replaced our dock this summer and
the

cost was approximately \$10,000. We also went through the appropriate

approval process two years ago to have a sea wall built out of natural

boulder rocks to protect the shore from further erosion.

We urge you to please keep an avenue open in the revision to

allow for renewals on existing private dock and buoy permits at Lake
Cascade

in Idaho. It is a very special place to us and we hope to share it with
our

children and grandchildren for years to come.

My dad worked for the USBR for 40+ years and was the

Commissioner for 5 years (John W. Keys III). I have spoken to him about

this issue and I understand that this revision may be appropriate for
some

Reclamation sites throughout the West. However, I believe Lake Cascade
in

Idaho is unique and that an exemption for renewal of existing permits
for

Lake Cascade should be incorporated throughout all rule revisions being

considered now, and in the future.

Thank you for your time in considering our concerns and desires.

Sincerely,

Robin (Keys) Fisher