2210.17 REV 2

CHAPTER 4. AWARD

4-1. OBJECTIVE. To identify processing requirements for award of

discretionary grants and cooperative agreements by the Office of

Procurement and Contracts (OPC) in Headquarters and Regional

Contracting Officers (RCOs) in the Field.

4-2. PLANNING AND COORDINATION. Program officials shall alert Grant

Officers to anticipated grant and cooperative agreement awards in a

timely manner. At Headquarters, all assistance requirements over

\$25,000 must be included in the Advance Procurement Plan prepared

annually by each Primary Organization Head. (See HUD Handbook

2210.3, \"Procurement Policies and Procedures,\" Chapter 4). For

Regional Offices, information may be provided through planning

documents or meetings either on a regularly scheduled basis or as

opportunities develop. Grant Officers are responsible for alerting

program officials to workload or other constraints that may impact

the schedule for any anticipated award.

4-3. REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE SERVICES.

a\. Program offices shall prepare a Form HUD-719, Request for

Assistance Services, in the appropriate detail for a grant or

cooperative agreement to be awarded and administered by Grant

Officers. The HUD-719 shall be signed by the initiating

Assistant Secretary or designee and shall constitute a delegation

of authority to the Grant Officer for award and administration in

accordance with the requirements of Chapters 4 and 5 of this

handbook.

b\. Project Description.

\(1\) General. There are various methods for informing potential

recipients about the nature of the work efforts under an

award. The method chosen will depend upon the nature of the

program, governing statutes, program guidelines, eligibility

restrictions, the level of competition anticipated and the

degree of flexibility afforded to the applicant in designing

the project. The following project description designs are

presented as a continuum, from the most general to the most

specific.

4-1 1/92

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

\(2\) Program Narrative is an explanation of the program. It can

be as simple as an overview of the program legislation

and/or regulations or very comprehensive. In the latter

case, the program officials may want to provide detailed

information on the program\'s background and purpose; provide

definitions of pertinent terminology; and, list eligibility

criteria for both projects and applicants.

This type of project description leaves the selection and

design of the project to the applicant. Usually, the

applicant will be required to draft a project narrative

which will serve as the scope of work for the award.

\(3\) Problem Statement is an explanation of the specific problem

which the Government is requesting the applicant to address.

In this instance, the project to be undertaken is defined by

the Government (to solve the particular problem) and both

the design of the project and methodology to be employed are

left to the applicant.

Normally, a description of the problem\'s background, a

statement of the project\'s objectives and a list of expected

outcomes are included in the Government\'s request for

applications. The applicant\'s response will detail the tasks

to be undertaken to achieve the objectives and produce the

expected outcomes and will serve as the scope of work for

the award.

\(4\) Statement of Work is the least flexible of the three project

description designs provided herein. In this instance, both

the project to be undertaken and specific tasks of work to

be followed are defined by the Government.

The Statement of Work should contain a background section, a

statement of objectives and a series of tasks that the

recipient must follow in completing the work effort. The

work tasks should be listed in order of substantive

relationship or serially in order of chronological

completion dates. The interrelationships of each task

should be clearly stated and each milestone, event, or work

1/92 4-2

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

product that signifies task completion should be clearly

defined. Applicants are free to suggest alternative tasks

as a means of accomplishing the objectives of the Statement

of Work. The final Statement of Work will be the subject of

negotiations between the successful applicant and the

Government. Both parties should be careful to include any

changes negotiated in the award. This will help to reduce

ambiguities and the possibility of a dispute over the scope

of the project during its progress.

c\. Justification for Restricted Eligibility. The determination to

restrict eligibility for a particular application kit must be

supported by a written justification approved by the responsible

HAA. Any of the following factors may restrict eligibility to

one applicant. They may be used individually or in any

combination to justify a restricted application kit or the

funding of an unsolicited proposal:

\(1\) The applicant is uniquely qualified to perform the work

described in the project scope;

\(2\) The applicant has submitted an unsolicited proposal which

offers a significant opportunity because its acceptance

would leverage substantial funding (equal to or greater than

HUD\'s share of the total cost) from other sources;

\(3\) The applicant has submitted an unsolicited proposal which

offers a unique idea or concept and it is not feasible to

pursue the project competitively without disclosing the

applicant\'s proprietary ideas;

\(4\) The applicant\'s organizational and professional affiliations

would significantly enhance the likelihood of success for

the sponsored project by virtue of the organization\'s

credibility or existing communication networks;

\(5\) The project to be sponsored would logically build upon the

applicant\'s predominant expertise and previous work in the

same area;

4-3 1/92

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

\(6\) The proposed project has received the direct approval of the

Secretary in accordance with program regulations; and/or

\(7\) A statute or court order directs award to a single source or

specific sources.

4-4. REVIEW OF REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE SERVICES.

a\. The Grant Officer shall review the Request for Assistance

Services package promptly. Any deficiencies or omissions shall

be referred immediately to the initiating office. Minor problems

should not preclude processing pending receipt of additional

information. If defects are major, the Grant Officer shall

suspend processing pending receipt of required information and/or

return the Request for Assistance Services.

b\. In reviewing the Request for Assistance Services, the Grant

Officer shall assure that:

\(1\) The award will be based on responses received to an

application kit or an unsolicited proposal;

\(2\) Any restriction of eligibility, (whether to a class of

applicants or a single applicant) not provided in applicable

statute or program regulation, is justified in a written

determination approved by the HAA;

\(3\) The proposed instrument type conforms to the requirements

stated in paragraph 2-4; and,

\(4\) The evaluation criteria and any program policy factors are

stated clearly and are not unduly restrictive.

4-5. NOTICES OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY AND APPLICATION KITS.

a\. Public Notice. In accordance with paragraph 2-7a, a NOFA shall

be published in the Federal Register. Additional announcements

may be made in other publications and media as necessary. Where

applicable, E.O. 12372 (Inter-governmental Review of Federal

Programs) requirements

1/92 4-4

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

should be included. The Commerce Business Daily may also

be used for publicizing requirements \-- generally when

applications from commercial organizations are expected or

substantial subcontracting opportunities are anticipated.

b\. Preparation and Review. An application kit shall be prepared in

accordance with the content requirements of paragraph 2-7d. The

application kit shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance

by the Grant Officer, GTR, and ARP, if established. An

application kit must provide applicants at least thirty (30) days

to prepare their applications.

c\. Issuance. Application kits shall be provided to:

\(1\) All potential applicants identified directly by HUD through

source or mailing lists; and,

\(2\) Any party requesting an application kit, whether or not a

potential applicant.

d\. Inquiries. In responding to inquiries, Grant Officers shall

assure no potential applicant is afforded a competitive advantage

over any other potential applicant, in accordance with the

provisions of paragraph 2-18.

e\. Amendment. An application kit may be amended at any time prior

to the application deadline provided:

\(1\) A reasonable amount of time is provided applicants to

respond to the amendment. This may require an extension of

the application deadline; and,

\(2\) The amendment is either publicized in the same manner as the

application kit or provided by direct notice to all

potential applicants.

4-6. APPLICATION RECEIPT.

a\. The Grant Officer shall receive all solicited applications. The

receipt of applications shall be recorded on a log containing at

least the following:

4-5 1/92

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

\(1\) Application Kit number;

\(2\) Name and city/state of applicant;

\(3\) Date and time of receipt; and

\(4\) Application number, if applicable.

b\. The Grant Officer shall ensure that the application kit provides

for the application deadline as stated in paragraph 2-8b and 3-8.

c\. Late applications and late amendments shall be rejected and the

applicant notified immediately by letter from the Grant Officer.

A late application shall be retained with the other unsuccessful

applications unless it is for a program involving recurring

application deadlines. See paragraph 2-8d. A file record shall

be maintained of:

\(1\) The application envelope or wrapper (a copy is acceptable);

\(2\) The date of mailing or delivery; and,

\(3\) The date and time of receipt.

4-7. APPLICATION REVIEW.

a\. Preliminary review. A preliminary review shall be conducted by

the ARP or designated official(s) of each application before a

detailed evaluation is conducted to assure that the application

is complete and the applicant and/or project is eligible. In no

case shall any official obtain additional information prior to

preliminary review and initial evaluation. Information necessary

to cure technical deficiencies shall be requested by the Grant

Officer, in writing, allowing the applicant 14 calendar days to

correct the deficiency. Correctable deficiencies must be minor

in nature, i.e., not affect the technical substance of the

application. (See paragraph 3-9).

b\. Rejection. The Grant Officer may reject an application which

does not include all information and documentation required by

the application kit if the nature of the omission precludes

review. The Grant Officer

1/92 4-6

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

shall reject an application from an applicant or project which is

ineligible for award based on the eligibility criteria stated in

the application kit. In those cases where the ARP conducts the

preliminary review for eligibility, the ARP shall notify the

Grant Officer immediately of those ineligible applicants. The

applicant shall be informed promptly by the Grant Officer of the

rejection of the application and the reasons for the rejection.

4-8. EVALUATION OF SOLICITED APPLICATIONS.

a\. Complete and eligible applications shall be evaluated in

accordance with the evaluation criteria stated in the application

kit by the ARP. The ARP is appointed by the selection official.

b\. Generally, the ARP shall consist of at least three voting

members; however, the ARP may consist of as few as one member

(i.e., if the evaluation of applications is not complex or few

applications are anticipated). All voting members shall be

Government employees. Non-voting advisors may be appointed to

the panel. Non-voting advisors may be other than Government

employees.

c\. All participants in the evaluation of applications shall be

subject to the requirements of paragraph 2-10b.

d\. The Grant Officer shall assure that the criteria used in

evaluating applications are those included in the NOFA and

application kit. This responsibility includes assuring that no

new criteria are added by the ARP, and that published criteria

such as program policy factors or evaluation criteria are not

changed after the deadline date.

e\. Each application shall be read and scored independently. The

score shall be supported by a narrative justification for each

evaluation criterion. The ARP shall convene and determine the

following:

\(1\) The score and ranking of each application;

\(2\) Whether each application is acceptable for funding, with or

without revision; and,

4-7 1/92

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

\(3\) Given available funding, those applications recommended for

selection or those applications to consider further for

selection.

f\. The ARP\'s determination shall be stated in a written evaluation

report to the selection official. The ARP\'s report shall justify

their recommendations, and be signed by all ARP members.

g\. The selection official shall review the ARP\'s report and either

make final selection or select those applicants with which

discussions will be held prior to final selection. Selection

shall be based on the ARP\'s evaluation, published program policy

factors, if any, and comments, if any, under E.O. 12372. The

selection official\'s decision may differ from the ARP\'s

recommendation provided justification is stated in a written

selection statement.

h\. Should the selection official decide discussions are necessary

prior to final selection, the Grant Officer shall conduct

discussions with the participation of the ARP. Discussions may

be held in person, by telephone, or in writing. Each applicant

shall be given an opportunity to revise its application by a

common date and time. Upon receipt of revised applications, the

Grant Officer shall forward them to the ARP and the process

stated in subparagraph e, f, g, and h of this section shall be

repeated until a final selection is made.

i\. Upon receipt of the selection official\'s final selection

statement and subsequent announcement of selected applicants, the

Grant Officer shall enter into negotiations with those selected

applicants, as necessary.

4-9. PREPARATION FOR NEGOTIATIONS.

a\. The purpose of negotiations is to establish mutual agreement

between HUD and the prospective recipient as to the terms and

conditions of award. Items that may require negotiations are:

\(1\) Instrument type;

\(2\) Funding arrangement;

\(3\) Funding amount;

1/92 4-8

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

\(4\) Cost sharing;

\(5\) Budget items and amounts;

\(6\) Project description;

\(7\) Project period;

\(8\) Extent of HUD involvement;

\(9\) Payment method;

\(10\) Use of program income;

\(11\) Property acquisition and disposition;

\(12\) Extent of contracting;

\(13\) Key personnel;

\(14\) Use of consultants;

\(15\) Reporting requirements; and,

\(16\) Other terms and conditions.

b\. The actual items to be negotiated for any individual award will

depend on the enabling statute, program regulations, NOFA,

application kit, application, and selection conditions. For some

awards, some items may not be negotiable due to fixed

requirements. In other cases, discretion may be available

concerning the negotiation of individual items. The Grant

Officer is responsible for coordinating as necessary with

program, legal, audit, financial, and other staff in preparation

for negotiation.

c\. The Grant Officer is responsible for assuring that some form of

cost, or price analysis is performed for each award in accordance

with paragraph 2-12. Whenever feasible, the analysis should

include qualitative technical evaluations by program officials.

Such technical evaluations shall

4-9 1/92

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

consider the amount, type, and mix of direct labor and

consultant effort; the extent and duration of travel; the type

and quantity of materials, property, or other direct cost items;

and the amount and type of subcontracted effort.

d\. When adequate cost or pricing data is not available from other

sources, the Grant Officer shall request the Office of Inspector

General (OIG) to perform a pre-award audit for fixed amount

awards in excess of \$250,000 and cost-reimbursement awards in

excess of \$500,000. At the discretion of the Grant Officer, the

OIG may be requested to perform a pre-award audit of any award.

e\. Prior to negotiations, the Grant Officer shall review the

applicant\'s responsibility to comply with award requirements in

accordance with paragraph 2-15. This includes requesting the

Office of Inspector General to check previous participation

information for the proposed recipient(s). Should the review

raise doubts as to the applicant\'s responsibility, he/she shall

resolve the issues through negotiations or deny the award.

Special restrictive conditions of award may be used in

accordance with paragraph 2-15f.

4-10. NEGOTIATION.

a\. The Grant Officer shall enter into negotiations as necessary

with the authorized representatives of the applicant. He/she

shall be assisted as necessary by HUD program, legal, financial,

or other staff.

b\. Selection for negotiations is not a commitment that an award

will be made. Should the parties be unable to reach mutual

agreement concerning the terms and conditions of award, the

Grant Officer shall terminate the negotiations.

c\. A file memorandum shall be prepared and signed by the Grant

Officer to summarize the negotiations. The memorandum shall

state participants, dates, positions, agreements, and

differences. The memorandum shall demonstrate how each budget

line item or total cost/price was determined to be allowable and

reasonable. It shall also describe how audit findings, if any,

were resolved.

1/92 4-10

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV 2

4-11. AWARD.

a\. After successful completion of negotiations, the Grant Officer

shall prepare the award document. The award cover page shall be

Form HUD-1044, Assistance Award/Amendment. Attached to the

cover page shall be the items stated in paragraph 2-16a.

b\. Three original copies of the award shall be signed in accordance

with paragraph 2-16b. One original copy each of the award shall

be provided to the recipient, the official file, and either the

Office of Finance and Accounting or Regional Accounting

Division.

c\. The Grant Officer\'s signature on an award or amendment

constitutes a certification as to compliance with all applicable

requirements for award or amendment.

d\. The Grant Officer shall comply with the applicable notification

requirements of paragraph 2-17. Any debriefings of unsuccessful

applicants shall be noted, in writing, in the official file.

4-11 1/92

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV-2

Exhibit 4-1

Request for

Assistance Services

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Page 1 of 2 form HUD-719 (4/91)

1 of 4 ref. Handbook 2210.17

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV-2 Exhibit 4-1

Instructions for Completing Form HUD-719

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Page 2 of 2

2 of 4

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV-2

Exhibit 4-1

Checklist for

New Grant/

Cooperative Agreement

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Page 1 of 1 form HUD-719-A (4/91)

3 of 4 ref. Handbook 2210.17

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

2210.17 REV-2

Exhibit 4-1

Checklist for

Grant/ Cooperative

Agreement Modifications

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* GRAPHICS MATERIAL IN ORIGINAL DOCUMENT OMITTED \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\* \*

\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Page 1 of 1 form HUD-719-B (4/91)

4 of 4 ref. Handbook 2210.17