### **Table of Contents**

### 

### **(i.) Program Scope**

## (ii.) Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program

### **(iii.) FGDC Background Information**

## 

## (iv.) 2003 CAP Categories Overview

## 

## (v.) CAP Categories 1, 2, 3, and 4; Specific Category Application Instructions and Information

I. Category 1: "Don't Duck Metadata;" Metadata Creation and
Implementation Assistance

# II. Category 2: "Don't Duck Metadata;" Metadata Trainer Assistance

## III. Category 3: " Don't Duck Metadata;" Metadata Outreach

## IV. Category 4: Clearinghouse Integration with OpenGIS Services

**V. Category 5: Joint U.S. and Canadian Spatial Data Infrastructure
Project**

## VI. General Application Instructions and Information: for Categories 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 -U.S. Organizations

**VII. Attachments**

Federal Geographic Data Committee

**National Spatial Data Infrastructure**

**2003 Cooperative Agreements Program**

**Program Announcement Number 03HQPA0006**

**Closes May 30,2003 @ 3:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time**

### **(i). Program Scope:**

The purpose of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI)
Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) is to fund innovative projects in
the geospatial data community to build the infrastructure necessary to
effectively discover, access, share, manage, and use digital geographic
data.

The NSDI consists of the technologies, policies, organizations and
people necessary to promote cost-effective production, and the ready
availability and greater utilization of geospatial data among a variety
of sectors, disciplines and communities. Specific NSDI areas of emphasis
include: metadata documentation, clearinghouse establishment, framework
development, standards implementation and geographic information system
(GIS) organizational coordination.

Since 1994 the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) has funded
projects that advance the NSDI in partnership with the geospatial data
community. Organizations are increasingly using metadata as an
internationally recognized means of preserving an organization's
investment in creating geospatial data, as well as providing users with
the ability to discover, evaluate and access data. At present, there are
over 200 clearinghouse sites globally that provide for data discovery.
Collaboration among the geospatial community is becoming increasingly
necessary, due to limited available resources, in order to meet the
demand of communities to create and use geospatial data for making sound
decisions. Also, there is a growing need for the availability of common
basic framework data that's reliable and can be used for timely,
cost-effective applications.

**Please Note**: CAP Program funds are not intended to support proposals
for the actual *creation, digitizing, purchase or collection* of
geospatial data. Nor should CAP funds be regarded as the means to
initiate or upgrade an organization's basic GIS operations through the
acquisition of equipment or staff. The principal purpose is to assist
implementation of the NSDI infrastructure that supports GIS activities.

## (ii). Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program

> (1). The purpose of the NSDI infrastructure is to improve the ability
> and efficiency of organizations to **discover**, **share**,
> **maintain**, and **utilize** geospatial data in carrying out their
> business. The CAP supports efforts to implement this infrastructure. A
> total of \$1,000,000 in funds is available for the FY 2003 program.
> The projects will be funded for one year. Award notification will be
> made by July 2003. Project work must commence by September 2003. Start
> dates on or after October 1, 2003 are not authorized under this
> announcement. Applications are open to Federal, state, and local
> governments, commercial, academic, non-profit, and Native American
> Tribal organizations.

(2). Funding will be awarded in five program categories as follows:

> [Category 1 -- "Don't Duck Metadata:" Metadata Creation and
> Implementation Assistance]{.underline} provides assistance to
> organizations in acquiring the skill, ability and experience to
> document data for clearinghouse discovery. Metadata is a basic first
> step in implementing the NSDI. This category is appropriate for
> organizations beginning the implementation of the NSDI.
>
> [Category 2 -- "Don't Duck Metadata:" Metadata Trainer
> Assistance]{.underline} provides funding support to knowledgeable and
> experienced metadata trainers for providing training to organizations
> and other organizations needing metadata training.
>
> [Category 3 -- "Don't Duck Metadata:" Metadata Outreach
> Assistance]{.underline} provides funding support to organizations with
> robust metadata programs to extend their programs to assist other
> organizations with resources and staff in innovative approaches to the
> implementation and service of metadata. This is a new CAP funding
> category.
>
> [Category 4 -- Clearinghouse Integration with OpenGIS
> Services]{.underline} provides funding to extend existing
> Clearinghouse Nodes with OpenGIS Consortium -- compliant web mapping
> and web feature service capabilities in a consistent way.

####### Category 5 -- Canadian/U.S. Spatial Data Infrastructure Project will support a collaborative project between organizations in the U.S. and Canada that have an interest in creating, maintaining and sharing geospatial data over a common geography. This category is separate from categories 1-4 with different application requirements. 

> (3). **Please note:** Under the 2003 CAP, applicant organizations
> should pick and submit a proposal to [only one category out of the
> five funding categories.]{.underline} Multiple proposals from the same
> organization will be disregarded. Please pick the category most
> appropriate to your organization's need and the intent of the program.
> You may partner with another organization's in a proposal however you
> may lead on only one.

(4). **Federal and non-federal awards**: Applications from Federal
agencies will not compete against applications from other non-federal
organizations. Funds are allotted for award under this program as
follows: \$665,000 to non-federal organizations and \$335,000 to Federal
organizations. Federal organizations should note the performance period
and end of Federal fiscal year in considering a proposal.

(5). **Methods of Agreement**: Projects of non-federal organizations
will be awarded funds as an Assistance Award by the U.S. Geological
Survey, Office of Federal Acquisition and Grants, National Assistance
Programs Branch. Projects of federal agencies will be awarded funds
through an Interagency Agreement by the FGDC Secretariat. Projects of
offices of the U.S. Geological Survey will be awarded funds by the FGDC
Secretariat by standard voucher or by budget sub-allotment transfer.
Federal applicants should note project performance period for the CAP
and the end of the Federal fiscal year.

(6). **Proposal Submission Period**: This program announcement and
application forms are expected to be available on or about March 3,
2003. **Applications must be received by May 30, 2003 @ 3:00 p.m.
(eastern standard time). LATE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.**

### **(iii). FGDC Background Information**

Before filling out an application, familiarize yourself with the NSDI at
the FGDC website: http://**www.fgdc.gov**. There you can find extensive
information on the NSDI as well as organizational contacts. You may want
to read the brief descriptions of what others have done in the past to
document their data sets under previous NSDI programs. See
[http://**www.fgdc.gov/funding**](http://www.fgdc.gov/funding) for
information on the CAP program**.**

## 

## (iv). 2003 CAP Categories Overview

[The following table outlines the general characteristics for the five
different project categories.]{.underline} Please note that the sections
relevant to preparing an application for a particular CAP category are
indicated.

+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+
| **CAP 2003**   | **Level of | **P        | *        | **Relevant   |
|                | Project    | artnership | *In-kind | Package      |
| **Categories** | Funding**  | Req        | Match    | Sections**   |
|                |            | uirement** | Requi    |              |
|                |            |            | rement** |              |
+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+
| **1 - "Don't   | Up to      | Encouraged | 50%      | Section I.,  |
| Duck           | \$9,000    |            |          |              |
| Metadata:"     |            |            |          | (A-M).       |
| Implementation |            |            |          |              |
| Assistance**   |            |            |          | Section VI.  |
+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+
| **2 - "Don't   | Up to      | Encouraged | None     | Section II., |
| Duck           | \$25,000   |            |          |              |
| Metadata:"     |            |            |          | (A--M).      |
| Trainer        |            |            |          |              |
| Assistance**   |            |            |          | Section VI.  |
+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+
| **3 -- "Don't  | Up to      | Encouraged | None     | Section      |
| Duck           | \$40,000   |            |          | III.,        |
| Metadata:"     |            |            |          |              |
| Metadata       |            |            |          | (A-M).       |
| Outreach**     |            |            |          |              |
|                |            |            |          | Section VI.  |
+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+
| **4 -          | Up to      | Encouraged | 50%      | Section IV., |
| Clearinghouse  | \$25,000   |            |          |              |
| Integration    |            |            |          | (A-M).       |
| with Web       |            |            |          |              |
| Mapping**      |            |            |          | Section VI.  |
+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+
| **5 -          | \$75,000   | Required & | 100%     | US &CA       |
| Canadian/US**  |            |            |          | O            |
|                |            | Documented |          | rganizations |
| Spatial Data   |            |            |          | -Section V., |
| Infrastructure |            |            |          |              |
| Project        |            |            |          | (A--Q).      |
|                |            |            |          |              |
|                |            |            |          | U.S          |
|                |            |            |          | Or           |
|                |            |            |          | ganizations- |
|                |            |            |          | Section VI.  |
+----------------+------------+------------+----------+--------------+

I. Category 1: "DON'T DUCK METADATA;" Metadata Creation and
Implementation Assistance

**A. Background:**

The documentation (metadata) of an organization's geographic data
holdings is an important and logical first step to participating in the
NSDI. Metadata provides not only a way to inventory and preserve
investments in costly geospatial data resources within an organization,
but also is a means for its discovery and sharing with other
organizations. The most difficult aspect of metadata implementation is
knowledge of the metadata standard, applying the standard to an
organizations data and business, and developing the organizational
support to maintain its practice.

## B. Metadata Implementation Goals:

## 

The goals for project organizations in this category are:

(1) that data documentation (metadata) becomes a standard operating
    practice through metadata training, metadata creation experience and
    organizational support

(2) metadata is served through a registered NSDI Clearinghouse node for
    data discovery

### **C. Measurable Results:**

(1) The number of individuals capable of creating metadata

(2) The number of metadata files or datasets documented

(3) The discovery at clearinghouse node registered with the FGDC

(4) The establishment of organizational practices for data documentation

**D. Deliverables:**

An interim report and a final report documenting activities and outcomes
are required. Report format and on-line submission can be found at the
FGDC 2003 CAP webpage.

## E. Applicant Eligibility:

All organizations or individuals (Federal, state and local government,
academia, commercial, non-profit and tribal organizations) may apply to
this category.

## 

A primary CAP program goal is to reach new organizations wishing to
begin metadata implementation. Organizations that participated in the
1999 CAP and in Category 1 projects in the 2000, 2001, 2003 CAP **are
not eligible** to apply under this category.

## 

## 

## F. Funded Tasks

Funding is provided to organizations in acquiring the knowledge,
experience and skill in creating descriptions (metadata) of geospatial
data sets and making metadata activity a standard organizational
practice.

> Funded tasks and items include:
>
> (1). Labor costs to create metadata
>
> (2). Travel to attend a training workshop in their region
>
> (3). Compensation to a trainer for providing your organization with
> training
>
> (4). Metadata collection and/or server software purchase

**G. Funding Amount:**

**Up to \$9,000.00 (**per project award) will be awarded to projects
under this category. Projects will be reimbursed electronically on costs
incurred in performance of the project.

## H. In-Kind Resource Match and Partnership Requirements:

Funds provide under this category are considered to be at a seed-funding
level. A minium [50% match]{.underline} is required in the categories of
resources including salaries, funds, or metadata software dedicated to
the project (the value of actual geospatial data holdings are not
considered appropriate for in-kind matches). For the maximum award of
\$8,000 the 50% in-kind match is \$4,000.

Partnerships with other organizations to leverage scarce resources are
encouraged but not required under this category. Partnerships, both
formal and informal among organizations to leverage limited geospatial
data resources, are seen as primary building blocks for the NSDI.

**I. Applicable Standards:**

(1) FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, Version 2
    (CSDGM), FGDC-STD-001-1998 or

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
(1) if available ISO Metadata Standard 19115 are applicable standards
    for this project category.

> \(3\) Metadata must be served through a NSDI registered Clearinghouse
> node.

**J. FGDC Project Resources:**

> The FGDC will provide through its website
> ([http://www.fgdc.gov](http://www.fgdc.gov/)) a wide range of
> information on metadata, clearinghouse, and standards, as well as
> contact information for the FGDC and its participating organizations
> at the national, state and local level. The FGDC provides at its
> website information on the metadata standard, and metadata trainers,
> training opportunities and NSDI news. The FGDC will attempt to address
> all queries and assistance requests, including referral to suitable
> software solutions.

**K. FGDC Involvement Statement:**

> The FGDC will collaborate closely with the awarded projects to promote
> data discovery and access through the implementation of metadata and
> publication in the clearinghouse. The FGDC will jointly monitor and
> agree on the milestones and accomplishments on work performed as part
> of this agreement. The FGDC will provide assistance to those
> organizations needing identification of registered clearinghouse nodes
> for serving their metadata over the Internet.

### **L. Application Review and Award Criteria**

Applications are considered based on the completeness of documentation,
and meeting of stated basic eligibility, and in-kind match and
partnership requirements. Specific evaluation factors are identified in
the proposal narrative and summary worksheet. Budget information is
evaluated for reasonableness and appropriateness to the CAP program as
well as applicant project goals. In addition, to the above criteria
proposals maybe selected for award in new geographic areas, in new
organizational sectors, or to be dispersed geographically.

Proposals are reviewed by a peer group of professionals knowledgeable in
the GIS discipline and the NSDI. Individual proposals are evaluated and
scored. Through peer consensus process proposals are ranked for meriting
award. The slate of proposals proposed for award is submitted to the
Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group for final approval.

### **M. Application Preparation Instructions:**

A complete application for Category 1 "Don't Duck Metadata:" Metadata
Creation and Implementation Assistance includes the following items and
should be assembled in the following order:

(1). **General Application Instructions and Information (see Section
VI.):** Prepare and follow directions for required documentation and
special forms as indicated in

Section VI. This section includes information for the following required
application documentation: (a) SF-424 Application for Federal
Assistance, (b) SF-424A Budget Information, (c) SF-424B Assurances, and
(d) Certifications for Federal Assistance.

In addition, prepare documentation below specific to category 1:

(2). **Category 1:"Don't Duck Metadata" Metadata Creation and
Implementation Proposal Summary,** (Fill out Attachment E).

(3). **Project Narrative**: Please limit to 3 pages. Please indicate the
(a). [Project Leader]{.underline} and (b). [Organization
Name]{.underline}. (c). [Project Narrative]{.underline}: Please describe
your project approach and plan addressing the following factors:

> (i). Why is the project important? Describe what you anticipate or
> know to be the benefits for your organization or other organizations
> (25 Points).
>
> (ii). Describe the plans to maintain your effort beyond the
> performance period, and how the practice of metadata creation will be
> supported by your organization as an ongoing process (25 Points).
>
> (iii). Describe the technical and organizational resources that will
> support the effort (25 Points).
>
> (iv). Does your project support (25 Points):

(1) applications of critical importance such as homeland security,
    critical infrastructure assurance, and emergency or hazard
    preparation, mitigation or response, or

(2) support of state or regional GIS infrastructure objectives and/or in
    coordination with state or regional GIS coordination groups or
    plans.

**End of Category 1\-\-\-\--**

# II. CATEGORY 2: "DON'T DUCK METADATA;" Metadata Trainer Assistance

**A. Background:**

The documentation (metadata) of an organization's geographic data
holdings is an important and logical first step to participating in the
NSDI. Metadata provides not only a way to inventory and preserve
investments in costly geospatial data resources within an organization,
but also is a means for its discovery and sharing with other
organizations.

One of the most difficult aspects of metadata implementation is
knowledge of the metadata standard, how to apply the standard to an
organization's data holdings and business goals, and acquiring the skill
creating metadata.

There are now many individuals and organizations nationwide that have
metadata and training expertise to assist in continuing the expansion of
metadata practice to organizations needing instruction as a first step
to implementation.

**B. Metadata Trainer Assistance Goals:**

The goals of this category is for organizations to initiate data
documentation (metadata) practices for their geospatial data holdings,
and that the resulting metadata are discoverable in the NSDI
Clearinghouse.

These goals are achieved by providing assistance to metadata trainers to
provide the training necessary for organizations to acquire the
knowledge of the metadata standard, application of the metadata standard
to their organizations data, and experience creating the initial
metadata datasets.

**C. Measurable Results:**

(5) The number of organizations beginning metadata implementation

(6) The number of individuals capable of creating metadata

(7) The discovery of resulting metadata at a clearinghouse node
    registered with the FGDC.

**D. Deliverables:**

\(1\) A report on each planned or completed training session is
requested. This information may be submitted by on-line submission or by
email.

\(2\) An interim report

\(3\) Final report documenting activities and outcomes are required.

Report format and on-line submission can be found at the FGDC 2003 CAP
webpage. In addition, reports maybe submitted by email to the CAP
coordinator.

**E. Applicant Eligibility:**

Applicants are sought under this category have:

(1) knowledge of the metadata standard

(2) proficiency in metadata training

(3) the ability to travel at a minimum within a state (regional and
    national travel desirable)

(4) flexibility in meeting the time and location requirements for
    conducting training

(5) optionally, have access to computers and computer facilities to
    demonstrate metadata collection and metadata record conversion.

All organizations or individuals (Federal, state and local government,
academia, commercial, non-profit and tribal organizations) may apply to
this category. Previous CAP participants may apply.

**F. Funded Tasks:**

Funded tasks and items may include:

(1). cost of conducting metadata training workshops

(2). travel to training sites

(3). equipment and facility rental

(4). training materials

(5). other necessary expenses

**G. Funding Amount:**

Up to \$25,000.00 (per project award) will be obligated to projects in
this category.

**H. In-Kind Resource Match and Partnerships:**

In-kind match of resources and the forming of partnerships are
encouraged for the success the project. In-kind resource matches
includes salaries, funds, equipment dedicated to the project and other
resources (the value of actual geospatial data holdings are not
considered appropriate for in-kind matches). Partnerships, both formal
and informal among organizations to leverage limited geospatial
resources, are seen as primary building blocks for the NSDI.

**I. Applicable Standards:**

Projects must be in conformance with the standards below:

(1) FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, Version 2
    (CSDGM), FGDC-STD-001-1998 or

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
(1) if available ISO Metadata Standard 19115 are applicable standards
    for this project category.

**J. FGDC Project Resources:**

The FGDC will provide through its website
([http://www.fgdc.gov](http://www.fgdc.gov/)) a wide range of
information on metadata, clearinghouse, and standards, as well as
contact information for the FGDC and its participating organizations at
the national, state and local level. The FGDC provides at its website
information on the metadata standard, a listing of metadata trainers and
training opportunities, and NSDI news. The FGDC will provide assistance
to those organizations needing identification of clearinghouse nodes for
serving their metadata over the Internet.

**K. FGDC Involvement Statement:**

The FGDC will collaborate closely with the awarded projects to monitor
and agree on milestones and accomplishments on work performed as part of
the agreement.

The FGDC will provide assistance such as metadata documentation and
training materials. In addition, the FGDC at its website will provide
trainers with calendar postings of their training sessions and their
contact information. FGDC will assist trainers in contacting projects
awarded under category 1 that need training. All funded trainers should
use FGDC web resources to identify themselves as metadata trainers and
to post their metadata classes.

**L. Application Review and Award Criteria:**

Applications are considered based on the completeness of documentation,
and meeting of stated basic eligibility, and in-kind match and
partnership requirements. Specific evaluation factors are identified in
the proposal narrative and summary worksheet. Budget information is
evaluated for reasonableness and appropriateness to the CAP program as
well as applicant project goals. In addition, to the above criteria
proposals maybe selected for award in new geographic areas, in new
organizational sectors, or to be dispersed geographically.

Proposals are reviewed by a peer group of professionals knowledgeable in
the GIS discipline and the NSDI. Individual proposals are evaluated and
scored. Through peer consensus process proposals are ranked for meriting
award. The slate of proposals proposed for award is submitted to the
Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group for final approval.

**M. Application Preparation Instructions:**

(1). **General Application Instructions and Information (see Section
VI.):** Prepare and follow directions for required documentation and
special forms as indicated in Section VI. This section includes
information for the following required application documentation: (a)
SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance, (b) SF-424A Budget
Information, (c) SF-424B Assurances, and (d) Certifications for Federal
Assistance.

In addition, prepare documentation below specific to category 2:

(2). **Category 2: "Don't Duck Metadata" Metadata Trainer Assistance
Proposal Summary** (Please fill out Attachment F).

(3). **Project Narrative**: The narrative should not exceed 3 pages.
Indicate the following:

a.  [Project Leader]{.underline}, [Organization Name]{.underline},
    [Project Narrative]{.underline}: In describing the project's
    approach and plan please address the following factors:

> (i). Describe your proficiency in metadata training. This includes
> conducting workshops, development of training materials, and
> especially work or familiarity with the FGDC-endorsed metadata
> standard. (40 Points)
>
> (ii). Describe your ability to travel to different locations
> statewide, regionally, and nationally. Also, indicate your access to
> training facilities that possess computer equipment appropriate for
> metadata training, collection and conversion, and other resources that
> will support the project. (35 Points)

(iii). Does your project support (25 Points):

(3) applications of critical importance such as homeland security,
    critical infrastructure assurance, and emergency or hazard
    preparation, mitigation or response, or

(4) support of state or regional GIS infrastructure objectives and/or in
    coordination with state or regional GIS coordination groups or
    plans, or

(5) support implementation of the Global Spatial Data Infrastructure
    (GSDI).

n **End of Category 2\-\--**

# III. CATEGORY 3: "DON'T DUCK METADATA;" Metadata Outreach

## A. Background:

Many small organizations create, maintain, and use geospatial data.
However, due to a lack of infrastructure, staff and other resources,
they are unable to fully implement a metadata program: the creation and
serving of metadata on a clearinghouse and providing data access.

In the same locality, state or region many organizations have fully
developed and robust NSDI metadata programs and clearinghouse sites.
These established metadata programs could potentially provide metadata
creation, metadata hosting, and data hosting for those organizations and
entities without infrastructure, staff or resources to carryout a
metadata program.

This category encourages those organizations with robust metadata
programs to extend their programs and assist other organizations without
resources and staff in innovative approaches to the implementation and
service of metadata.

## B. Metadata Outreach Goals:

## 

Resource constrained organizations will have a process and support
structure through which their geospatial data is:

> \(1\) documented in metadata,
>
> \(2\) for that metadata to be served on an established NSDI
> clearinghouse node, and (3) through the clearinghouse provide
> electronic access to their geospatial data.

NSDI experienced and developed organizations will provide innovative
partnership support with these organizations to develop this process. A
metadata partnership process is established between organizations to
support metadata creation and service; in this way metadata becomes part
of the business practice in organizations without metadata programs.

### **C. Measurable Results:**

\- Number of organizations participating in the project whose metadata
is discoverable in the NSDI clearinghouse.

\- Number of metadata created and served.

\- Number of partnerships established that sustain an on-going metadata
service.

\- Number of accessible geospatial datasets discovered through the NSDI
clearinghouse.

**D. Deliverables:**

A mid-term report and a final report with executive summary documenting
activities and outcomes are required. Reporting can be submitted on-line
at the FGDC 2003 CAP webpage.

## 

## 

## E. Applicant Eligibility:

(1). Applicant organizations must have an operational NSDI registered
clearinghouse site serving metadata.

(2). Applicant organization must be experienced or have resources for
the creation of compliant metadata.

(3). Organizations from all sectors (Federal, state and local
government, academia, commercial, non-profit and tribal organizations)
may apply to this category.

## F. Funded Tasks:

Funded tasks and items may include:

(1). Labor costs to create and serve metadata

(2). Outreach travel and communications

(3). Outreach promotion of the importance of metadata to the
organization to facilitate metadata as a part of the organizations
culture

(4). Training for metadata creators: implementation of the creation of
metadata when creating data

# G. Funding Amount:

Up to \$40,000 (per project award) will be obligated to individual
projects under this category.

# H. In-kind Resource Match and Partnerships:

An in-kind match of resources and the forming of partnerships are
encouraged for the success and long-term sustainability of the project.
In-kind resource matches includes salaries, funds, equipment dedicated
to the project and other resources (the value of actual geospatial data
holdings are not considered appropriate for in-kind matches).
Partnerships, both formal and informal among organizations to leverage
limited geospatial resources, are seen as primary building blocks for
the NSDI.

**I. Applicable Standards**:

Fully compliant metadata is created, parsed, and served through an
established clearinghouse. The applicable standards are:

(2) FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, Version 2
    (CSDGM), FGDC-STD-001-1998 or

(3) if available ISO Metadata Standard 19115 are applicable standards
    for this project category.

> \(3\) Metadata must be served through a NSDI registered Clearinghouse
> node.

**J. FGDC Project Resources:**

The FGDC will provide through its website
([http://www.fgdc.gov](http://www.fgdc.gov/)) a wide range of
information on metadata, clearinghouse, and standards, as well as
contact information for the FGDC and its participating organizations at
the national, state and local level. The FGDC provides at its website
information on the metadata standard, a listing of metadata trainers and
training opportunities, and NSDI news.

Capabilities now exists where remote organizations can place metadata on
their website and have the new Isite come fetch and index it. Technical
guidance on hosting and indexing remote metadata for other organizations
is available on request from the FGDC Secretariat.

The FGDC will provide assistance to those organizations needing
identification of clearinghouse nodes for serving their metadata over
the Internet. The FGDC will attempt to address all queries and
assistance requests.

**K. FGDC Involvement Statement:**

The FGDC will collaborate closely with the awarded projects to promote
data discovery and access through the implementation of metadata and its
service through the clearinghouse. The FGDC will jointly monitor and
agree on the milestones and accomplishments on work performed as part of
this agreement.

### **L. Application Review and Award Criteria**

Applications are considered based on the completeness of documentation,
and meeting of stated basic eligibility, and in-kind match and
partnership requirements. Specific evaluation factors are identified in
the proposal narrative and summary worksheet. Budget information is
evaluated for reasonableness and appropriateness to the CAP program as
well as applicant project goals. In addition, to the above criteria
proposals maybe selected for award in new geographic areas, in new
organizational sectors, or to be dispersed geographically.

Proposals are reviewed by a peer group of professionals knowledgeable in
the GIS discipline and the NSDI. Individual proposals are evaluated and
scored. Through peer consensus process proposals are ranked for meriting
award. The slate of proposals proposed for award is submitted to the
Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group for final approval.

### **M. Application Preparation Instructions:**

(1). **General Application Instructions and Information (see Section
VI.):** Prepare and follow directions for required documentation and
special forms as indicated in Section VI. This section includes
information for the following required application documentation: (a)
SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance, (b) SF-424A Budget
Information, (c) SF-424B Assurances, and (d) Certifications for Federal
Assistance.

In addition, prepare documentation below specific to category 3:

(2). **Category 3:"Don't Duck Metadata:" Outreach Summary,** (Fill out
Attachment G).

(3). **Project Narrative**: Please limit to 3 pages. Please indicate the
(a). [Project Leader]{.underline} and (b). [Organization
Name]{.underline}. (c). [Project Narrative]{.underline}: Please describe
your project's approach and plan addressing the following factors:

> (i). With the goal of effectively reaching and assisting as many
> organizations as possible, describe the scope of your project. In
> addition, describe any relationships with those organizations
> established or to be established that will support your effort. (20
> Points)
>
> (ii). Describe the resources that will support your project (staff,
> expertise, clearinghouse and metadata resources, etc.). (20 Points)
>
> (iii). Is your project sustainable, does it initiate or build on an
> on-going organizational or technical ability to provide this
> assistance in the future? Describe. (20 points)
>
> (iv). Does your project support (20 points):

(6) applications of critical importance such as homeland security,
    critical infrastructure assurance, and emergency or hazard
    preparation, mitigation or response, or

(7) support of state or regional GIS infrastructure objectives and/or in
    coordination with state or regional GIS coordination groups or
    plans.

> (v). Why is the project important? Describe what you anticipate or
> know to be the benefits for your organization or other organizations
> (20 Points).

##### End of Category 3 \-\-\-\--

# 

# 

# 

# 

# 

# IV. CATEGORY 4: Clearinghouse Integration with OpenGIS Services

**A. Background:**

The OpenGIS Consortium (OGC) Web Mapping Specification (WMS 1.0) allows
map servers to create and send standard map images over the Web as GIF,
PNG, of JPEG in a manner that lets client software overlay and display
multiple maps from multiple servers -- and even different vendors. The
use of WMS as an extension to the Clearinghouse allows existing data
holdings, described in metadata, to be viewed in this standard way,
giving prospective data clients the chance to visually explore the
spatial data behind the Clearinghouse from potentially multiple sites.
The ability to deliver vector geographic information is now supported by
the OGC Web Feature Service (WFS) -- another area of integration
research.

This CAP initiative for integrating OpenGIS Services with Clearinghouse
will provide funding to extend existing Clearinghouse Nodes with
OGC-compliant web mapping service capabilities and/or Web Feature
Services in a consistent way. OpenGIS-conformant software exists as
extensions to both freeware and commercial servers as a complement to
existing map and data service capabilities. Although the FGDC will not
directly assist in the installation and configuration of base map server
software, it will provide guidance and referrals to add-on OGC server
capabilities and register these with an NSDI service registry. A list of
software solutions known to support the OGC WMS 1.0 and WFS are
identified at the OpenGIS website:
(<http://www.opengis.org/testing/product/index.php?conf=0&sort=organization&direction=desc>)
Click on "Implementing or Conforming."

**B. Goal:**

The goal for projects in this category is to deploy web map or feature
server (and optionally, client) software for linking to and viewing
geospatial data from metadata in the NSDI Clearinghouse utilizing
embedded URL map requests.

**C. Measurable Results:**

\- Operational capability of web map and feature service is established
for each project participant's Clearinghouse node.

\- OGC Web mapping or feature service is registered with the FGDC.

\- Links to map servers and feature services for each layer are visible
through links in metadata stored in a Clearinghouse Node.

**D. Deliverables:**

An interim report and final report documenting activities and outcomes
is required.

**E. Applicant Eligibility:**

(1). All organizations or individuals (Federal, state and local
government, academia, commercial, non-profit and tribal organizations)
may apply to this category.

(2). The applicant's operational Clearinghouse Node must be registered
with the FGDC at the time of proposal submission. Applicants are
preferred that are already operating web map server software that can be
extended to support OGC Web Mapping Standard 1.0 Web Mapping Services
and OGC Web Feature Services 1.0 (see list at
[http://www.opengis.org](http://www.opengis.org/) site).

(3). Organizations who were awarded under 2000, 2001, and 2002 CAP
program for clearinghouse integration with OpenGIS specifications and
web mapping are not eligible to apply to this category.

**F. Funded Tasks**:

\- Consultant or software integrator time is expected to be the primary
expense.

\- Reasonable expense for hardware and software may be funded dependent
on available funds.

**G. Funding Amount:**

Up to \$25,000 (per project award) will be obligated to individual
projects under this category.

**H. In-kind Resource Match and Partnerships Requirements:**

\- Funds provide under this category are considered to be at a
seed-funding level. A minimum [50% match]{.underline} is required in the
categories of resources including salaries, funds, software dedicated to
the project (the value of actual geospatial data holdings are not
considered appropriate for in-kind matches). For the maximum award of
\$25,000 the 50% in-kind match is \$12,500.

\- Applicants are encouraged to establish logical geographic area
partnerships and establish at least two Web Mapping Services on
different computers in different organizations within each project.

**G. Applicable Standards**:

Projects must be in conformance with the standards and guidelines below:

(1) OpenGIS Consortium Web Mapping Standard 1.0 Web Mapping Services or
    Web Feature Services (WFS) 1.0

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
(1) Metadata standards

    a.  FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, Version 2
        (CSDGM), FGDC-STD-001-1998 or

    b.  if available, ISO Metadata Standard 19115

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
(1) Metadata for each map or feature theme must be served through a NSDI
    registered Clearinghouse node.

**J. FGDC Project Resources:**

\- The FGDC will provide through its website
([http://www.fgdc.gov](http://www.fgdc.gov/)) a wide range of
information on metadata, clearinghouse, and standards, as well as
contact information for the FGDC and its participating organizations at
the national, state and local level.

\- The FGDC will assist projects in providing or locating appropriate
software extensions for integration with clearinghouse.

\- The FGDC will provide guidance on how OGC WMS links are to be
inserted in FGDC metadata for compatibility and discovery in the
Clearinghouse.

\- The FGDC will provide initial training, tutorial and referral
assistance.

**K. FGDC Involvement Statement:**

The FGDC will collaborate closely with the awarded projects. The FGDC
will jointly monitor and agree on the milestones and accomplishments on
work performed as part of this agreement.

### **L. Application Review and Award Criteria**

Applications are considered based on the completeness of documentation,
and meeting of stated basic eligibility, and in-kind match and
partnership requirements. Specific evaluation factors are identified in
the proposal narrative and summary worksheet. Budget information is
evaluated for reasonableness and appropriateness to the CAP program as
well as applicant project goals. In addition, to the above criteria
proposals maybe selected for award in new geographic areas, in new
organizational sectors, or to be dispersed geographically.

Proposals are reviewed by a peer group of professionals knowledgeable in
the GIS discipline and the NSDI. Individual proposals are evaluated and
scored. Through peer consensus process proposals are ranked for meriting
award. The slate of proposals proposed for award is submitted to the
Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group for final approval.

### 

### **M. Application Preparation Instructions:**

A complete application for Category 4: Clearinghouse Integration with
OpenGIS Services includes the following items and should be assembled in
the following order:

(1). **General Application Instructions and Information (see Section
VI.):** Prepare and follow directions for required documentation and
special forms as indicated in Section VI. This section includes
information for the following required application documentation: (a)
SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance, (b) SF-424A Budget
Information, (c) SF-424B Assurances, and (d) Certifications for Federal
Assistance.

In addition, prepare documentation below specific to category 4:

(2). **Category 4: Clearinghouse Integration with OpenGIS Services
Proposal Summary,** (Fill out Attachment H).

(3). **Project Narrative**: Please limit to 5 pages. Please indicate the
(a). [Project Leader]{.underline} and (b). [Organization
Name]{.underline}. (c). [Project Narrative]{.underline}: Please address
each of the following factors in the sequence as they are listed. The
maximum possible score is 100 points.

> (a). Project Application: Describe intended application (e.g.
> emergency or hazard preparation, critical infrastructure, homeland
> security, crime mapping, water quality etc.) and the organizations
> involved. Describe the plan for project implementation. Describe the
> organization's roles and commitments to the project. Please describe
> the extent of web mapping services to be established by the project.
> (20 points)
>
> (b). NSDI Related Experience: Describe current level of activities and
> involvement on any NSDI related work. This includes the NSDI areas of
> standards, metadata, clearinghouse, framework, or organizational
> coordination. Optionally, indicate if the proposal supports state or
> regional GIS infrastructure objectives or coordination with state or
> regional GIS coordination groups or plans (20 Points)
>
> (c). Clearinghouse and Metadata Capability: Describe experience and
> current functionality of clearinghouse, NSDI Clearinghouse node
> registration and service of FGDC compliant metadata. (20 points)

(d). Web Mapping Service Capability: Describe your project's web mapping
service for interactive display of GIS data and the name of the vendors.
Please indicate if web mapping server software is operating that can be
extended to support OGC Web Mapping Standard 1.0 Web Mapping Services.
In addition, if hardware and software are to be acquired under this
grant please describe it and justify its function to the project. (20
points)

> (e). Project Software Integrator: Describe proposed name, credentials,
> tasks, workload of prospective project software integrator. (20
> points)

n **End of Category 4 \--**

V. CATEGORY 5: JOINT U.S. AND CANADIAN SPATIAL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECT

### **A. Scope**

> (1). General Description: Applications of digital geospatial data vary
> greatly, but users have a recurring need for a few common themes of
> data. In the framework concept, a geospatial data community can work
> together to produce and maintain commonly needed data for national,
> regional, state, and local analysis. Within the geospatial data
> community, multi-agency, and multi-sector partnerships are being
> established in local and regional areas to collaboratively leverage
> resources and funding, and coordinate data collection, utilization,
> and access. The framework concept builds on these activities by
> identifying basic information content, and the technical, operational,
> and business contexts by which a distributed, collaborative data
> collection and maintenance effort for the framework would operate.
>
> The evolving framework concept is important to the geospatial data
> community. The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Secretariat
> and GeoConnections Secretariat are co-sponsoring a joint project (via
> a Memorandum of Understanding) for the development of framework data.
> This framework data will cover a continuous piece of geography
> including both Canada and the U.S., and will enhance further
> understanding of the complexities, challenges, and effort required in
> utilizing framework data to address a common issue between the two
> countries.
>
> This category advances the capacity of communities to create and use
> basic geospatial data. Projects funded under these categories will
> demonstrate collaborative GIS approaches and decision‑support in
> solving community issues utilizing basic \"framework\" data and
> through the use or refinement of existing FGDC, GeoConnections, and
> International Framework standards. Projects will establish a
> collaborative process that provides different kinds of organizations
> and disciplines with the ability to integrate and share framework
> data.
>
> (2). Applications are open to Federal, state, and local governments,
> commercial, academic, non-profit, and Native American Tribal
> organizations. In category 4, Canadian organizations (private,
> commercial, academic and nonprofit), federal (special funding case
> please refer to section D item 2) and provincial government agencies,
> and First Nations (Canadian Indian) groups may apply.

(3). The FGDC will fund under category 5 cost shared project to
demonstrate the ability to address sound community decision-making
through the collaborative use, maintenance and sharing of basic
geospatial Framework data. One project will be funded under this year's
CAP.

> (4). Category 5 proposals must demonstrate collaboration between
> organizations in the U.S. and Canada.
>
> (3**). Please note that under this FY 2003 CAP, applicant
> organizations may submit [only one proposal]{.underline} package.
> Previous Joint U.S. and Canadian Framework Demonstration Project award
> recipients are not eligible.**

### **B. Framework References**

Applicants can find information on spatial data infrastructures through
the GeoConnections and FGDC web sites (http://www.geoconnections.org/
and In particular, applicants should familiarize themselves with the
following framework reference sources:

(1). **U.S. Sources:**

\- Federal Geographic Data Committee web site **http://www.fgdc.gov/**

> \- *Framework Introduction and Guide*, FGDC 1997
> **http://www.fgdc.gov/framework/frameworkintroguide/**
>
> \- *Development of a National Geospatial Data Framework*, FGDC 1995
> **http://www.fgdc.gov/framework/framdev.html**
>
> (2). **Canadian Sources:** All the following sources of information
> can be found through the GeoConnections web site at
> **http://www.geoconnections.org/** (in the opportunities section
> containing this announcement) and in
> **http://www/geoconnections.org/english/framework.**
>
> *- Towards a Conceptual Framework Architecture to Support the (CGDI)*
>
> *Framework Data Study*, May 1999
>
> \- *GeoConnections Workshop on National Framework Data*, February 1999
>
> \- *Data Integration and Tools for Framework Data,* Nov. 1998
>
> \- *New & Improved Base Framework for National Atlas Data,* Aug. 1999
>
> \- *Framework Data Node Terms of Reference*
>
> \- *National workshop on Administrative Boundaries*, Sept. 2000
>
> *- Framework Data Definition Document*
>
> *- <http://www.geoconnections.org/english/framework/> in the section
> "Request for Proposals" to look for "GeoConnections' Standards".*

**C. Project Goal**

The goal of this project is to stimulate cross-border cooperation over a
geographic area through the use of a common geospatial data framework.
This project will test methods for building a common framework,
stimulate private sector participation, suggest topics for future
research and development, and provide guidance on policies and practices
for the establishment of an operational framework between the U.S and
Canada.

Possible projects that may benefit from cross-border framework
cooperation include, but are not limited to:

\- Flooding issues in the Red River Valley;

\- Environmental issues in the Great Lakes;

\- Resource Management issues in the Gulf of Maine; and,

\- Fisheries issues in the Pacific Northwest

This project should advance the capacity of a U.S./Canadian community to
utilize framework data. Furthermore, the project should demonstrate
collaborative approaches in solving community issues utilizing framework
data. Participation by different kinds of organizations and disciplines
is important, as is the ability to integrate and share framework data
among these different users.

### **D. Funding for Program: US/Canadian Support**

> (1). **U.S funding support** for the project will be provided by the
> U.S. Geological Survey on behalf of the Federal Geographic Data
> Committee (FGDC). **A total of \$75,000.00** (US Dollars) is available
> for fiscal year 2003. This funding will be given to the lead US
> organization, and the award document authorizing the funds will be
> separate from the Canadian agreement authorizing Canadian funds.

(2). **Canadian funding support** for the project will be provided by
the Natural Resources Canada, GeoConnections. In Canada, a contribution
agreement is used to financially support the cost share project. For
federal departments, an interdepartmental fund transfer will be used
instead of a contribution agreement. **A total of \$100,000.00**
(Canadian Dollars) is available for the fiscal year 2003/2004. This
funding will be made to the lead Canadian organization and will be
awarded by authorized representatives of Canada.

(3). Depending on the proposal merit, one joint project will be funded
with each government issuing its own award document. This estimate does
not bind the U.S. or Canada to a specified number of awards or to the
amount of any award unless that amount is otherwise specified by statute
or regulation. Payment will be made based on project Milestones. The
final payment will represent at least 10% of the FGDC or GeoConnections
share.

(4.) Due to the joint binational scope of this project, the lead US
organization will bear responsibility to meet USGS requirements and the
lead Canadian organization will bear responsibility to meet
GeoConnections requirements. Thus, two cost proposals are required for
each Canadian/U.S. proposal, one for U.S organization and one for the
Canadian organization.

### **E. Participants Cost-Share** 

(1). The [**U.S. applicants** must provide 100% in-kind matching
funds]{.underline} in U.S. dollars from funds other than those received
under this project from the U.S. Geological Survey.

> (2). The [**Canadian applicants** must provide 100% in-kind matching
> funds]{.underline} in Canadian dollars from funds other than those
> received under this project from the GeoConnections Program.

(3). These funds may be in the form of cash and/or in-kind contributions
(materials, services, or personnel provided to the proposed project).
[Existing in-place equipment (unless primarily or exclusively used for
the project) is not to be considered acceptable as an in-kind
contribution. No geospatial data sets, whether existing or to be
acquired, are considered acceptable as an in-kind contribution. Profit
must not be included in the in-kind contribution.]{.underline}

#### **F. Disbursement of Funding Support**

[Applicants must demonstrate that both a lead U.S. organization or
agency and a lead Canadian organization or agency are involved in the
project.]{.underline} Furthermore, each country's lead
organization/agency is required to collaborate with another organization
or agency in its respective country. Thus each application will have a
minimum of four organizations or agencies--two from Canada and two from
the U.S. Funding will be provided only to the lead organization in each
country. They in turn, have the responsibility of dispensing the
appropriate funds to their collaborating organization(s). Canadian funds
are to be spent by Canadian participants and U.S. funds are to be spent
by U.S. participants.

### **G. Eligibility Requirements**

(1). Qualified applicants from among American and Canadian organizations
include Federal, State, Provincial and local government agencies,
educational or academic institutions, private sector/commercial firms,
utilities, private foundations, not-for-profit organizations, and Native
American tribes or First Nations (Canadian Indian) groups in the U.S.
and Canada are invited under this Program Announcement.

(2). At least one participant from each country must be a private
sector/commercial firm.

(3). Although proposals must demonstrate that at a minimum four (at
least two Canadian and two U.S.) organizations are participating in the
project, multi-sector partnerships are encouraged. As stated previously,
a lead organization for the U.S. and a lead organization for Canada must
be identified.

(4). [The application must clearly define the tasks and responsibilities
of each collaborative organization.]{.underline} An **Agreement of
Participation** (Attachment J) is required of each organization
participating. Each participating organization shall agree to
contribute, in-kind or cash, to the project.

#### **H. Unsuitable Applications**

> (1). Applications will not be considered for projects on topics not
> being sought under this Program Announcement. Though integral to many
> operations, data collection is not considered an appropriate activity
> for funding under this Program Announcement.
>
> (2). Applications are sought from U.S. and Canadian organizations.
> Applications from any other countries (other foreign governments,
> foreign citizens, educational institutions in foreign countries or
> firms located in foreign countries) will not be accepted.
>
> (3). Proposals in which there is a real or an appearance of a conflict
> of interest will not be accepted.
>
> (4). Applications solely involving the direct procurement of a product
> or service will not be considered.

(5). Applications that do not meet the requirement for
participation/collaboration of other organizations will not be
considered.

#### **I. Period of Performance**

The project will begin upon completion of the award documents on or
about June 2003. All activities proposed must be completed on or before
[May 17, 2004.]{.underline}

#### **J. Reporting Requirements**

Note that travel costs for project participants to attend the three
meetings identified in the reporting requirements should be included in
the cost proposals. The meeting locations are proposed by the applicant.

Required reports, presentations, and other participatory involvement:

> (1). Initial Orientation meeting involving all key project
> participants, the GeoConnections representative and FGDC Secretariat
> (Travel by project participants may be required depending on meeting
> location as proposed by the applicant);
>
> (2). Milestone reports indicating project progress;
>
> (3). Interim progress review meeting (Travel by project participants
> may be required depending on meeting location as proposed by the
> applicant); and,
>
> (4). Final technical report of project activities that includes:
>
> (a). Project summary;
>
> (b). Project outcome;
>
> (c). Recommendations for framework development;
>
> (d). Assessment of project success;
>
> (e). Plans for follow-on activities including outreach;
>
> (f). Discussion about user-demand requirements for framework data in a
> national level spatial data infrastructure; and,
>
> (g). Discussion about commonalities, issues, difficulties, and
> challenges (both technical and policy) that were encountered.
>
> (h). Any other relevant deliverables.

(5). Formal oral presentation of the Project (Travel by project
participants may be required depending on meeting location as proposed
by the applicant).

# K. Publicity 

It's important that project results receive wide dissemination to
increase the base of knowledge and experience that can be shared
throughout the profession and geospatial community. Organizations
receiving an award are encouraged to publish the results of any work
supported under this Program Announcement, without review by the FGDC or
GeoConnections. However, publications or other written products
resulting from the project must acknowledge the financial assistance of
the FGDC or GeoConnections.

> (1). Publication of project results is strongly encouraged;
>
> (2). Formal oral presentation of the project (travel by project
> participants will be required, depending on meeting location as
> proposed by the applicants); and,

(3). Display the NSDI logo and GeoConnections logo on participating
organizations home page and link to the FGDC and GeoConnections
Geospatial Data Clearinghouse server if applicable to the project.

#### 

#### 

#### 

#### **L. Award Terms and Conditions**

(1). Awards made under this Program Announcement to the lead [US
organization]{.underline} shall be administered in accordance with
**General Terms and Conditions** (Attachment L) and **Special Terms and
Conditions** (Attachment M).

(2). Canadian funding support for the project will be provided by the
Natural Resources Canada, GeoConnections Secretariat. In Canada, the
proponents will be paid by cheques to financially support the cost share
project. For federal departments, an interdepartmental settlement
transfer will be issued instead of cheque. A total of \$100,000.00
(Canadian Dollars) is available for the fiscal year 2003/2004. This
funding will be made to the lead Canadian organization and will be
awarded by authorized representatives of Canada.

#### **M. Instructions for Preparing the Application**

The application should be assembled in the following order listed below.
(See Section VII: List of Attachments for a summary of required
application documentation for U.S. and Canadian organizations.)

> (1). **Standard Form SF -- 424** *Application for Federal Assistance*
> (Attachment A)((Applies to U.S. organizations only) The lead **US
> organization** should prepare this attachment and should be signed by
> an individual authorized to commit the applicant.

In addition, the US organization should provide a cost proposal that
contains a breakdown of the total estimated project cost by individual
milestones described in your Technical Proposal. This cost proposal
should show in-kind and grant funds, and what each organization is
contributing or spending on each milestone.

(2). **Standard Form SF -- 424A** *Budget Information --
Non-Construction Programs* (Attachment B) **(**Applies to U.S.
organizations only) U.S. organization should prepare this document.
**[U.S. lead organization should follow additional instructions found in
Section VI.]{.underline}**

> (3). **Canadian Applicant Budget Information.** (Applies to Canadian
> organizations only) Preparation of the price proposal for Canadian
> participants - Please include sufficient funds to cover three travel
> requirements: (a). attendance at an initial program orientation
> meeting, (b). attendance at a Interim progress review meeting, and
> (c). a formal oral presentation of project activities at a conference
> agreed upon between the FGDC/GeoConnections and the award recipient.
> This meeting location is to be proposed by the applicant.
>
> **Allowable Expenditures**
>
> The Recipient agrees that the contribution referred to in Section D
> (2), Canadian Funding Support, of this announcement will be applied to
> the allowable expenditures incurred in the course of conducting the
> project activities. The allowable expenditures are:
>
> -direct costs of carrying out the project, including: professional
> labor fees, project management, development of a demonstration of the
> ability to address sound community decision-making through the
> collaborative use, maintenance and sharing of basic geospatial
> Framework Data; travel to conduct the project (at rates negotiated
> with GeoConnections), project coordination and communications.
>
> -administration of the project, including: administrative labor;
> liaison with project consultants, GeoConnections, FGDC; others
> partners; translation; printing and binding of project reports.

**(**a). **Method of Payment**: The pricing basis for the resultant
contribution may be negotiated between GeoConnections and the selected
Applicant. Negotiation of the pricing basis may be required normally in
accordance with the requirements stated in the RFP.

**(**b). **Price Proposal:** The price proposal should contain a
detailed breakdown of the total estimated project cost by individual
milestones in a firm price bid and described in the Technical Proposal
application. [Please note that the project team cannot submit a price
proposal based on average rates. Each project team member\'s workload
has to be priced separately using appropriate costing procedures. The
total of all project team member prices will be included in the proposed
total estimated project cost.]{.underline}

**(**c). **Project Cost Breakdown:** This detailed total estimated
project cost breakdown should address, as applicable, but not be limited
to, each of the following:

(i.) **[Labor:]{.underline}** For each individual to be employed on the
project, indicate the proposed daily rates (including overhead, fringe
benefits, but excluding profit), and the estimated time to be spent by
each individual for each major activity of each milestone.

(ii.) **[Other Direct Charges]{.underline}:**

**- Equipment/Software Rental**. Rental costs will be considered, if
included in your price proposal. However, purchase costs for equipment
or software are not acceptable and will not be considered. The original
purchase price of the equipment or software as well as the number of
years of useful life of the equipment or software should be provided
with the price proposal. Equipment and software used in the day-to-day
business of the organization are covered in the overhead in the labour
rates and cannot therefore be considered as in-kind contributions. The
costs for equipment/software should not exceed 25% of the total
estimated project cost.

\-**Training:** Costs related to training activities required for
execution of the project should not exceed 10% of the total estimated
project cost. This includes time spent training, travel to and from
training activity.

**- Materials, Supplies, Components:** Indicate general categories and
the pricing basis, inclusive of customs duty and taxes, but exclusive of
GST/HST. Indicate whether the items are likely to be used or consumed
during the course of the project work.

**- Travel and living expenses:** Indicate the estimated number and cost
of trips together with the basis of these costs[.]{.underline}

**- Subcontracts:** Identify potential subcontractors and provide for
each the same cost breakdown information detailed herein.

**- Other Charges:** Identify any other direct charges, inclusive of
customs duty and taxes, but exclusive of GST/HST, such as long distance
communication and rental costs. Please provide the estimated cost of
each one, and the relevance to the proposed work.

[Profit: Not applicable since proposals are required to be submitted on
a cost sharing basis. Foregoing of profit is not allowable as a
contribution.]{.underline}

[Advance payments: Based on Treasury Board Policy on Transfer of
Payments (2-12).]{.underline}

Contributions are normally paid on the basis of achievement of
performance objectives or as reimbursement of expenditures incurred.
Where advance payments are necessary, they should be limited to the
immediate cash requirements of the recipient and not exceed the
following payment frequency:

+------------------+-----------+------------------+-------------------+
| Total Value of   | Duration  |                  |                   |
| annual amount    | of        |                  |                   |
|                  | Agreement |                  |                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------------+-------------------+
|                  | ##### L   | 4 months or      |                   |
|                  | ess than  | longer           |                   |
|                  | 4 months  |                  |                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------------+-------------------+
|                  |           | Initial Advance  | Subsequent        |
|                  |           |                  | Advances          |
+------------------+-----------+------------------+-------------------+
| Up to \$24,999   | 90%       | 90%              | N/A               |
+------------------+-----------+------------------+-------------------+
| \$25,000 -       | 90%       | Up to 75%        | Quarterly         |
| \$100,000        |           |                  |                   |
+------------------+-----------+------------------+-------------------+

For agreements of less than 4 months, the schedule represents the
maximum percentage that may be paid out initially, with the balance
payable monthly or at the end of the agreement. The amount of each
advance payment would correspond to its frequency, e.g. a quarterly
advance would be for the approximate amount of expenditures expected to
be incurred by the recipient in the following three months.

> (4). **Proposal Information Summary** (Attachment I): **(**To be
> prepared jointly by collaborating U.S. and Canadian applicants). This
> is a summary of your proposal and should follow the format as shown in
> the attachment. This information will be used on the FGDC and
> GeoConnections websites and publications.

**N. Proposal Application Narrative**

The narrative is the most important part of your application. (To be
prepared jointly by collaborating U.S. and Canadian applicants).
[Applicants shall submit an unbound, signed original and 10 rubber
banded or binder-clipped copies of the application.]{.underline} The
Application Narrative shall not exceed 12 single-spaced pages (including
figures and tables), and the type size shall not be smaller than
12-pitch/10 point type. References, appendices, curriculum vitae,
letters of support/endorsement, and related documentation are not
included within the 12-page limit.

[Applications for funding will be considered in accordance with the
following factors set forth below]{.underline}. Proposals should address
each of the following factors in the exact headings and sequence as they
are listed. Please provide sufficient definition or description of
methodology within the context of the project, to permit understanding.
Please be very explicit. We encourage applicants to use examples to
demonstrate their understanding. The maximum possible score for all
selection factors together is 100 points. The application narrative
should not exceed 12 pages.

> (1). Project Description -- Merit to the Framework (20 points)
>
> Proposals will be evaluated on the quality and relevance of the
> project to the Framework.

(a). The proposal should include a concise description of the project; a
clear statement of project objectives; an explanation of how, and to
what degree, the proposed effort contributes to the development of a
joint U.S./Canadian framework and identify an issue in need of improved
cross-border cooperation. The project must address a practical problem
as described under Scope (section A) and Project Goal (section C) of
this announcement.

> (b). Proposals should include citations of related and ongoing
> projects and describe their connection to such ongoing projects.
>
> (c). The proposal should include specific well-defined project
> outcomes that will result from this project. Describe how such
> outcomes will foster the increased use of a common geospatial
> framework for Canada and the United States.

(2). Project Approach (20 points)

Applications should outline the steps that will be taken to implement
the project. The applicant should describe feasibility and levels of
risk associated with this project. Provide a detailed project plan to
accomplish the stated objective.

> (a). Proposals will be evaluated on the degree to which they reflect
> an understanding and detail of the tasks and procedures necessary to
> accomplish the stated objective. The proposal will be evaluated to
> determine whether the resources identified by the applicant to
> accomplish the tasks are reasonable relative to the anticipated
> results, and whether they accurately reflect the level of effort
> described in the proposal, including the necessary facilities,
> equipment, and supplies.
>
> (b). Proposals will be evaluated on the adequacy of the methodology to
> carry out the effort; steps taken to implement the project, evidence
> of adequate planning; effectiveness of the plan of management to
> assure proper and efficient administration of the project; and quality
> of the applicant\'s plans to use its resources and personnel to
> achieve the project objective.
>
> (c). To show clearly the tasks and responsibilities of the project,
> the proposal should include two tables. The first table emphasizes
> participating organizations and shows their roles and contributions
> (as shown below). The second table emphasizes contributions by project
> milestone (also shown below).

Table 1

+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| #######         | **Human\        | **Role**        | *               |
| ## Organization | Resources**     |                 | *Contribution** |
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| Company A       | Joe Smith       | Scientist       | \- data         |
|                 |                 |                 | analysis        |
|                 | Sam Johns       | Analyst         |                 |
|                 |                 |                 | \- labour       |
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+
| Agency X        | Paula Data      | Data processing | \- travel       |
|                 |                 |                 |                 |
|                 |                 |                 | \- material     |
|                 |                 |                 |                 |
|                 |                 |                 | \- labour       |
+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------+

Table 2

+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| #       | **Tasks** | **Team\  | **\#      | **Deliv   | **Due     |
| ####### |           | m        | Days**    | erables** | date**    |
| # Phase |           | embers** |           |           |           |
+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| 1       | Research  | Tom      | 10        | Milestone | December  |
|         |           | Jones    |           | report    | 1^st^     |
|         |           |          | 5         |           |           |
|         |           | Julie B. |           | Prototype | February, |
|         |           |          |           |           | 4th       |
+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| 2       | Analysis  | Afonso   | 3         | Milestone | March     |
|         |           | M.       |           | report    | 31^st^    |
+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

> (d). The proposal should include a work plan that indicates clearly
> identified outcomes as a means of assessing progress. In outlining
> project tasks, please include a Work Plan Milestone Chart (such as
> Gantt) illustrating major activities and their completion dates as an
> attachment to the Application Narrative (the milestone chart does not
> count against the 12 page narrative limit). The Initial Orientation
> Meeting, Interim Progress Review Meeting, and Final Technical Report
> shall be in your milestones.
>
> (e). Proposals will be evaluated on their ability to register and
> catalogue metadata to a clearinghouse for searching at the end of the
> project.

(3). Technical/Operational Context (30 points)

> Proposals should demonstrate technical and operational goals. The
> technical approach will be evaluated on its ability to address:
>
> (a). The framework goals of:
>
> (1). Data integration (horizontal and vertical alignment, scale,
> conflation, generalization, semantics, format conversion, and
> assessment of data quality);
>
> (2). Maintenance of data including updates and revisions;
>
> (3). Convergence of framework concepts and methodologies between U.S.
> and Canada including: Utilization of the U.S. NSDI framework data
> themes: geodetic control, cadastral data, hydrography, elevation,
> government units, transportation, and orthoimagery; and Canadian CGDI
> framework themes: geodetic reference system, roads, hypsography (DEM),
> hydrographic layers, Canadian Data Alignment Layer (CDAL), and
> administrative boundaries;
>
> (4). Implementation and use of standards (i.e. FGDC Metadata standard
> or ISO metadata standard);
>
> (5). Certification of framework data.
>
> (b). The operational capability to use web map and web feature client
> and server software for linking and viewing geospatial framework data
> between U.S. and Canadian organizations. This capability should use
> Open GIS Consortium (OGC) specifications.
>
> (1). Describe how clearinghouses will be used in the project. Include
> current functionality of clearinghouse and its service of compliant
> metadata. Describe efforts to extend clearinghouse to include OGC
> compliant web mapping services.
>
> (2). Describe the extent that OGC compliant web mapping services are
> part of this project.
>
> (3). Describe the extent that OGC compliant web feature services are
> part of this project.

(4)**.** Business Context (10 points)

> The application should describe the approach proposed to ensure that
> the project will result in framework data that are widely used and
> useful--increased framework data accessibility. Innovative approaches
> are encouraged. These include:
>
> (a). avoidance of restrictive practices that would inhibit the use of
> the framework;
>
> (b). provide information about copyright and intellectual property
> issues, data limitations, including suggested optimal uses of data,
> disclaimers and liability;
>
> (c). be available in public and non-proprietary format(s);
>
> (d). use business practices that increase framework data activities.

(5). Project Participants/Experience/Outreach (20 points)

> (a). Participation: Each project must involve four or more
> organizations. Proposals will be evaluated based on the level and
> diversity of participation. Applications should clearly define the
> tasks and responsibilities of each collaborative organization
> (Complete the **Agreement of Participation** Attachment J). Any
> addition evidence of the activity being endorsed and supported (formal
> Memoranda of Understanding and/or letters of commitment from
> participating organizations) should be provided as attachments.
>
> (b). Experience: Proposals will be evaluated to assess the
> applicant\'s experience and competence to perform the proposed effort
> successfully, including the following: the significant qualifications
> of key personnel to be used in the project; the time that each person
> named will commit to the project; and whether the staffing is adequate
> to complete the effort in the designated time frame. Describe
> experience, qualifications, and skills held by the staff for
> performance of the project. (Resumes of key personnel may be provided
> as attachments).
>
> (c). Outreach: The application should describe the means of providing
> for communication and outreach to stakeholders, such as, web pages,
> workshops, and informational meetings. Also, the proposal should
> describe ways to improve project visibility. The application should
> describe the degree that the project accommodates the participation of
> new or other organizations having similar data interests over the
> project area;

### **O. Application Closing Date** 

Applications must be received on or before [**May 30, 2003 at 3:00 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time**.]{.underline} An application received after the
closing date and time will not be considered unless it can be
demonstrated that the completed application package was mailed before
the deadline and late delivery was due to mishandling by the carrier. An
application received after the closing date and time that does not meet
the mailing requirements above will be returned to the applicant.

### **P. Delivery of Application** 

(1). (a.) Submit one unbound, signed original and (b.) 10 binder-clipped
copies of the application package.

(2). By mail to:

Ms. Karen Staubs, Contracting Officer

U.S. Geological Survey

Office of Federal Acquisition and Grants

MS 205G, National Assistance Programs Branch

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive

Reston, VA 20192.

(3). By hand: An application that is hand delivered shall be delivered
to the U.S. Geological Survey, Office of Acquisition and Grants, Room
6A331, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA. The Office of Acquisition
and Grants will accept hand delivered applications in Room 6A331 during
business hours. Business hours are 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. daily, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.

###### **Q. Contact Information** {#q.-contact-information .unnumbered}

For questions concerning the preparation of the application contact
please contact:

(1). U.S. organization applicants:

Ms. Karen Staubs, Grant Specialist

U.S. Geological Survey

Office of Federal Acquisition and Grants

MS 205G, National Assistance Programs Branch

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive

Reston, VA 20192

email: kstaubs@usgs.gov

(2). Canadian organization applicants:

> Bob Johnson
>
> Program Coordinator
>
> GeoBase Secretariat
>
> 615 Booth Street, Room 750,
>
> Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A-0E9
>
> Tel: (613) 943-2373

email: bjohnson@nrcan.gc.ca

** End of Category 5** \-\--

VI\. GENERAL APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION

This section applies to CAP Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 proposals. This
section also applies to U.S. organizations applying to Category 5.
(Instructions for Category 5 Canadian organizations will be found in
Section V)

### **A. Eligibility**

> (1). See individual categories for eligibility requirements.
>
> (2). No USGS cooperative funds will be used to reimburse U.S. Federal
> employees travel, per diem, etc.
>
> (3). All activities conducted under the project must be carried out by
> the Recipient and their collaborators. Subcontracting activities,
> other than those specified in the proposed application and approved in
> the negotiated agreement, will not be allowed without the written
> permission of the Grant Administrator.
>
> (4). All activities proposed should be completed within one calendar
> year after award of the cooperative agreement.

### **B. Unsuitable Applications**

> (1). Applications will not be considered for projects on National
> Spatial Data Infrastructure topics not being sought under this Program
> Announcement.
>
> (2). Digitizing and other forms of spatial data collection are not
> considered appropriate activities for funding under this Program
> Announcement. The purchase or upgrade of a Geographic Information
> System (GIS) equipment or software is also not considered appropriate
> (software specific to metadata activities is allowed).
>
> (3). Applications from foreign governments, foreign citizens,
> educational institutions in foreign countries or firms located in
> foreign countries will not be accepted.
>
> (4). Applications in which there is a real or an appearance of a
> conflict of interest will not be accepted.
>
> (5). Applications solely involving the direct procurement of a product
> or service or large purchases of equipment will not be considered
> (e.g. the purchase of computer systems equipment and software).

### **C. Preparation of the Application**

The application package should be assembled in the following order:

> (1). **Standard Form SF -- 424** *Application for Federal Assistance*
> (Attachment A): This coversheet provides general information about the
> proposal. This document should be signed by an individual authorized
> to commit the applicant's organization.
>
> (2). **Standard Form SF -- 424A** *Budget Information --
> Non-Construction Programs* (Attachment B): [Fill out Section B -
> Budget Categories, Number 6. Object Class Categories
> only.]{.underline} No other part of the form requires completion. The
> proposed budget shall be prepared in the following order, showing the
> amount proposed for each of the following items. If applicable,
> indicate the amount of cost sharing by the recipient for each item.

(a). [Personnel (6.a):]{.underline} Salaries and wages. Identify
individuals or categories of salaries and wages, estimated hours or
percent of time, and the rate of compensation proposed for each person
or category. Include an explanation of the amounts included for
projected increases if the rate of pay shown is higher than the current
rate of pay. The applicant is advised that tuition remission and other
forms of compensation paid as, or in lieu of, wages to students
performing necessary work are allowable provided that the tuition or
other payments are reasonable compensation for the work performed and
are conditioned explicitly upon the performance of the work.

(b). [Fringe Benefits (6.b):]{.underline} Labor overhead. Indicate the
rates/amounts in conformance with normal accounting procedures. Explain
what costs are covered in this category and the basis of the rate
computations. Indicate whether rates are used for proposal purposes only
or whether they are also fixed or provisional rates for billing
purposes. Include a copy of the most current negotiated rate agreement,
if applicable.

(c). [Travel (6.c):]{.underline} State the purpose of the trip and
itemize the estimated travel costs to show the number of trips required,
the destinations, the number of people traveling, the per diem rates,
the cost of transportation, and any miscellaneous expenses for each
trip. Calculations of other special transportation costs (such as
charges for use of applicant‑owned vehicles or vehicle rental costs)
should also be shown. Any foreign travel should be clearly stated in the
budget. Per diem rates in excess of the U.S. Government Joint Travel
Regulations shall not be allowed unless specifically allowed under
applicable OMB Circulars. Travel for Federal employees cannot be
included.

> (d). [Equipment (6.d):]{.underline} Show the cost of all
> special‑purpose equipment necessary for achieving the objectives of
> the project. \"Special‑purpose equipment\" means scientific equipment
> having an acquisition cost of \$1,000 or more per item. Equipment
> should be itemized with each item described and its application to the
> proposed project explained. (General‑purpose equipment must be
> purchased from the applicant\'s operating funds. Also see (B)(5) above
> covering "Unsuitable Applications")

(e). [Supplies (6.e)]{.underline}: Enter the cost for all supplies.
Include the cost of office, laboratory, computing, and field supplies
separately. Provide details on any specific supplies exceeding \$1,000
in value or which represents a significant portion of the total proposed
amount. If fabrication of equipment is proposed, list parts and
materials required for each and show costs separately from the other
items.

(f). [Contractual (6.f):]{.underline} Services or consultants. Identify
the tasks or problems for which such services would be used. List the
contemplated sub-recipients by name (including consultants), the
estimated amount of time required, and the quoted rate per day or hour.
If known, state whether the consultant\'s rate is the same as received
for similar services or under Government contracts or assistance awards.

(g). [Construction (6.g):]{.underline} Not applicable to CAP program; do
not use this category.

(h). [Other (6.h):]{.underline} Publication costs. Show the estimated
cost of publishing (if appropriate) the results of the project effort,
including the final report. Include costs of drafting or graphics,
reproduction, page or illustration charges, and a reasonable number of
reprints. Use this category for any other costs not indicated above.
Itemize the different types of costs such as helicopter use, boats,
shipping, telemetry, computing, equipment‑use charges, or other
services. Provide breakdowns showing how the cost was estimated; for
example, computer time should show the type of computer, estimated time
of use, and the established rates.

(i). [Total Direct Charge (6.i):]{.underline} Total items (6.a.) through
(6.h.).

(j). [Indirect Charges (6.j):]{.underline} General and administrative
(G&A) cost. Show the proposed rate, cost base, and proposed amount for
allowable indirect costs based on the cost principles applicable to the
applicant\'s organi­zation. If the applicant has separate rates for
recovery of labor overhead and G&A costs, each charge should be shown.
Explain the distinction between items included in the two cost pools.
The applicant should propose rates that it is willing to establish as
fixed or ceiling rates in any resulting award. (Please pay special
attention to the requirement to include a copy of the approved
negotiated indirect cost rate agreement, if applicable, with the
original application *only*.)

(k). [Totals (6.k):]{.underline} Amounts proposed. Total items (6.I) and
(6.j.).

(3). [General Assistance Award Conditions]{.underline}: U.S.
organizations that submit applications as a result of this process will
be required to sign forms, required by law, in order to receive Federal
assistance funding. An authorized official from the applicant
organization must read and sign both of these forms. These forms can be
viewed by visiting the following Internet site:
[www.usgs.gov/contracts/index.html](http://www.usgs.gov/contracts/index.html)**.**
They are:

> (a). **Standard Form SF -- 424B**; *Assurances -- Non-Construction
> Programs* (Attachment C); and
>
> (b). **U.S. Department of the Interior Certifications for Federal
> Assistance** (Attachment D).
>
> (4). Other Attachments: Please follow with any documentation indicated
> above in the particular category in which you are applying. These
> include Application Narratives, Project Summary.

**D. Terms and Conditions:**

Awards made under this Program Announcement shall be administered in
accordance with:

(1). **General Terms and Conditions** (Attachment M) and\
(2). **Special Terms and Conditions** (Attachment N). This attachment
covers requirements for Method of Payment, Principal Investigator,
Project Officer, Contracting Officer, Rights in Technical Data, Public
Domain, and Adherence to Original Project Objectives and Budget
Estimates.

### **E. Application Closing Date** 

Applications must be received on or before [**May 30, 2003 at 3:00 p.m.
EDT**.]{.underline} An application received after the closing date and
time will not be considered unless it can be demonstrated that the
completed application package was mailed before the deadline and late
delivery was due to mishandling by the carrier. An application received
after the closing date and time that does not meet the mailing
requirements above will be returned to the applicant.

### **F. Delivery of Application** 

(1). (a.) Submit one unbound, signed original and (b.) 10 binder-clipped
copies of the application package.

(2). By mail to:

Ms. Karen Staubs, Grant Specialist

U.S. Geological Survey

Office of Federal Acquisition and Grants

MS 205G, National Assistance Programs Branch

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive

Reston, VA 20192.

(3). By hand: An application that is hand delivered shall be delivered
to the U.S. Geological Survey, Office of Acquisition and Grants, Room
6A331, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA. The Office of Acquisition
and Grants will accept hand delivered applications in Room 6A331 during
business hours. Business hours are 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. daily, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays. Applications received after
the closing date and time will not be considered unless it can be
demonstrated that the completed application was mailed before the
deadline and late delivery was due to the mishandling by the carrier. An
application received after the closing date and time that does not meet
the mailing requirements above will be returned to the applicant..

### **G. Review Process for Applications**

Prior to the Panel evaluation, the Grant Specialist will review all
proposals for completeness, conformity to application requirements, and
overall eligibility. Deficient applications will not be considered. The
applicant will be promptly notified in writing with the reason(s) why
the application was found to be deficient.

Accepted proposals will be evaluated through formal review panels.
Representatives from the FGDC and other individuals with appropriate
expertise drawn from participating FGDC organizations will comprise the
review panel and will evaluate proposals for program relevance,
technical merit, and resources requirements. This process will take up
to three months, and applicants will not be notified of the status of
their application until the review process is completed.

The FGDC will strive to fund as many projects as possible, but there is
no guarantee that specific projects will be funded or that organizations
will receive the full amount they request. The level of individual
project funding will be determined, in large part, by the number of
funded applications received. Other factors may include:

> (1). The commitment of organizations to sustain the effort to
> contribute to the NSDI, as reflected in the narrative;

(2). The conformance of project objectives with state or regional GIS
infrastructure strategic plans and collaboration with other
organizations;

(3). The geographic distribution of projects; and,

(4). The limitation of available funds.

Applicants that have been selected for funding will receive a letter
from the Contracting Officer advising them of this, and no other
acknowledgment of the application will be issued before the evaluation
of proposals has been completed.

Applicants will be notified if their application does not fall under the
scope of this program. If an application does not meet all requirements,
the applicant will receive a letter from the Contracting Officer
advising you that the application will not be funded and that a future
letter will be issued by the Project Officer stating the reasons why the
application was not funded. Resubmissions will not be allowed.

## H. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

This information is being collected to determine the eligibility of the
applicant and as a basis for approval or disapproval of the proposed
research. The purpose of the program is to facilitate and foster
partnerships, alliances, and technology within and among various public
and private entities in building the NSDI.

Public report burden for this collection is estimated to average 42
hours per cooperative agreement application and 40 hours to prepare an
annual or final technical report. Direct comments regarding the burden
estimate or any other aspect of this collection to: Bureau Clearance
Officer, USGS, 807 National Center, Reston, VA 20192; and Desk Officer
for the Interior Department, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503

OMB No. 1028-0051 Expiration Date: November 30, 2003

## I. Access Board Standards

Federal Agencies receiving funds that involve the development of
software, databases and/or web applications, must comply with the Access
Board standards at 326 CFR Part 1194.

###### **J. Contact Information** {#j.-contact-information .unnumbered}

For questions concerning the preparation of the application please
contact:

Ms. Karen Staubs, Grant Specialist

U.S. Geological Survey

Office of Federal Acquisition and Grants

MS 205G, National Assistance Programs Branch

12201 Sunrise Valley Drive

Reston, VA 20192

email: kstaubs@usgs.gov

### **VII. List of Attachments**

[Project Categories:]{.underline} **1** = Category 1: Metadata
Implementation Assistance, **2** = Category 2: Metadata Trainer
Assistance, **3** = Category 3: Metadata Outreach, **4** = Category 4:
Clearinghouse Integration with OpenGIS Services, and **5** = Category 5:
Canadian/US Spatial Data Infrastructure Project. For Category 5:
"**US**" and "**CA**" indicates documentation to submitted with proposal
applicable to U.S. and Canadian organizations respectively.

[Note:]{.underline} "**Required**," indicates documentation required to
be submitted in proposal by category and "**I**"= applicable background
and reference information.

+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| > | ##                         | # CA |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            | P Fu |      |      |      |      |
| * | ## Attachment Title        | ndin |      |      |      |      |
| * |                            | g Ca |      |      |      |      |
| A |                            | tego |      |      |      |      |
| t |                            | ries |      |      |      |      |
| t |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| a |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| c |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| h |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| m |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| e |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| n |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| t |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| s |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
|   |                            | *    | 2    | *    | *    | *    |
|   |                            | *1** |      | *3** | *4** | *5** |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| # | **SF - 424**               | #    | **Re | **Re | **Re | **US |
| # |                            | #### | quir | quir | quir | -**  |
| # | **Application for Federal  | ###  | ed** | ed** | ed** |      |
| # | Assistance**               | Requ |      |      |      | **Re |
| # |                            | ired |      |      |      | quir |
| # | www.whitehous              |      |      |      |      | ed** |
| # | e.gov/omb/grants/sf424.pdf |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| A |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **SF -- 424 A**            | **Re | **Re | **Re | **Re | **US |
| * |                            | quir | quir | quir | quir | -**  |
| B | **Budget Information --    | ed** | ed** | ed** | ed** |      |
| * | Non-**                     |      |      |      |      | **Re |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      | quir |
|   | **Construction Programs**  |      |      |      |      | ed** |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | www.whitehouse             |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | .gov/omb/grants/sf424a.pdf |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **SF -- 424 B**            | **Re | **Re | **Re | **Re | **US |
| * |                            | quir | quir | quir | quir | -**  |
| C | **Assurances --            | ed** | ed** | ed** | ed** |      |
| * | Non-Construction**         |      |      |      |      | **Re |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      | quir |
|   | **Programs**               |      |      |      |      | ed** |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | www.whitehouse             |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | .gov/omb/grants/sf424b.pdf |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Certifications**         | **Re | **Re | **Re | **Re | **US |
| * |                            | quir | quir | quir | quir | --** |
| D | www.usgs.go                | ed** | ed** | ed** | ed** |      |
| * | v/contracts/FGDC/certs.pdf |      |      |      |      | **Re |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      | quir |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      | ed** |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Category 1 - Proposal    | #    | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  |
| * | Summary**                  | #### |      |      |      |      |
| E |                            | ###  |      |      |      |      |
| * | General project and        | Requ |      |      |      |      |
| * | contact information for    | ired |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Category 2 -- Proposal   | N/A  | ##   | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  |
| * | Summary**                  |      | #### |      |      |      |
| F |                            |      | ###  |      |      |      |
| * | General project and        |      | Requ |      |      |      |
| * | contact information for    |      | ired |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Category 3 - Proposal    | N/A  | N/A  | ##   | #    | N/A  |
| * | Summary**                  |      |      | #### | #### |      |
| G |                            |      |      | ###  | #### |      |
| * | General project and        |      |      | Requ |  N/A |      |
| * | contact information for    |      |      | ired |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Category 4 -- Proposal   | N/A  | N/A  | #    | ##   | N/A  |
| * | Summary**                  |      |      | #### | #### |      |
| H |                            |      |      | #### | ###  |      |
| * | General project and        |      |      |  N/A | Requ |      |
| * | contact information        |      |      |      | ired |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| # | **Category 5 - Proposal    | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | **US |
| # | Summary**                  |      |      |      |      | &    |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      | CA** |
| # | Required for lead US and   |      |      |      |      |      |
| # | Lead Canadian              |      |      |      |      | **Re |
| # | organizations              |      |      |      |      | quir |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      | ed** |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| I |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| # | **Category 5 - Agreement   | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | **US |
| # | of Participation**         |      |      |      |      | &    |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      | CA** |
| # | Required for all           |      |      |      |      |      |
| # | participants               |      |      |      |      | **Re |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      | quir |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      | ed** |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| J |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **SF -- 1199A**            | I    | I    | I    | I    | US   |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| K | **Direct Deposit Sign-up   |      |      |      |      | I    |
| * | Form**                     |      |      |      |      |      |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | To be filled out on award  |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | ######## Ge                | I    | I    | I    | I    | US   |
| * | neral Terms and Conditions |      |      |      |      |      |
| L |                            |      |      |      |      | I    |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Special Terms and        | I    | I    | I    | I    | US   |
| * | Conditions**               |      |      |      |      |      |
| M |                            |      |      |      |      | I    |
| * | Item 1 "Method of Payment" |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | and Item 7 "Payment"       |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | instructions different for |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | Federal and Non-Federal    |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | organizations              |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **SF -- 269 A**            | I    | I    | I    | I    | US   |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| N | **Financial Status         |      |      |      |      | I    |
| * | Report - Short Form**      |      |      |      |      |      |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | To be submitted at         |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | completion of project.     |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| # | **Metadata Factsheet**     | I    | I    | I    | I    | I    |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # | www.f                      |      |      |      |      |      |
| # | gdc.gov/publications/docum |      |      |      |      |      |
| # | ents/metadata/metafact.pdf |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| # |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
|   |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| O |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | ######                     | I    | I    | I    | I    | I    |
| * | ## Clearinghouse Factsheet |      |      |      |      |      |
| P |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | www.fgdc                   |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | .gov/publications/document |      |      |      |      |      |
|   | s/clearinghouse/chouse.pdf |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Framework Factsheet**    | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | I    |
| * |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| Q | www                        |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | .fgdc.gov/publications/doc |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | uments/framework/frame.pdf |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+
| * | **Framework Introduction & | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | N/A  | I    |
| * | Guide**                    |      |      |      |      |      |
| R |                            |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | www.fgdc.gov/fra           |      |      |      |      |      |
| * | mework/frameworkintroguide |      |      |      |      |      |
+---+----------------------------+------+------+------+------+------+