BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
N026928

May 13, 2008

CLA-2-83:OT:RR:NC:N1:121

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 8302.41.6050

Mr. Joseph R. Hoffacker

Barthco International Inc.

5101 S. Broad Street

Philadelphia, PA 19112-1404

RE: The tariff classification of a curtain tieback pin from India

Dear Mr. Hoffacker:

In your letter dated April 22, 2008, on behalf of Urban Outfitters,
Inc., you requested a tariff classification ruling. The sample which you
submitted is being returned as requested.

The merchandise under consideration is described as a Curtain Tieback
Pin- Big Eyed Owl, style number BPS-1527. It is formed in the shape of
an owl with big green eyes sitting on a branch. It is made of 95 percent
aluminum and 5 percent acrylic (the eyes). It measures approximately 3
inches high by 2-1/2 inches wide and has a one inch long spike on its
back that holds a curtain aside by pressing through the curtain and into
the wall.

The applicable subheading for the curtain tieback pin will be
8302.41.6050, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
which provides for base metal mountings, fittings and similar
articles..., other mountings, fittings and similar articles, and parts
thereof, suitable for buildings, other, or iron or steel, of aluminum or
of zinc, for curtains, draperies and window shades. The rate of duty
will be 3.9 percent ad valorem.

Articles classifiable under subheading 8302.41.6050, HTSUS, which are
products of India are currently entitled to duty free treatment under
the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) upon compliance with all
applicable regulations. The GSP, however, is subject to modification and
periodic suspension, which may affect the status of your transaction at
the time of entry for consumption or withdrawal from warehouse. To
obtain current information on GSP, check our Web site at www.cbp.gov and
search for the term \"GSP\".

Duty rates are provided for your convenience and are subject to change.
The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are
provided on World Wide Web at http://www.usitc.gov/tata/hts/.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the
Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact
National Import Specialist Barbara Kaiser at 646-733-3024.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski

Director,

National Commodity

Specialist Division
**DA 08-1017**

**Released: April 30, 2008**

**[CERTIFIED MAIL -- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED]{.underline}**

Journal Broadcast Corporation

KMIR-TV

3355 South Valley View Boulevard

Las Vegas, NV 89102

Journal Broadcast Corporation

KMIR-TV, Palm Springs, CA

Facility ID No. 16749

File No. BRCT-20060804AFU

Dear Licensee:

This refers to your license renewal application for station KMIR-TV,
Palm Springs, CA.

Section 73.3526 of the Commission's Rules (Rules) requires broadcast
licensees to maintain a public inspection file containing specific types
of information related to station operations.[^1] As set forth in
Section 73.3526(e)(11)(i) of the Rules, a TV issues/programs list is to
be placed in a commercial TV broadcast station's public inspection file
each calendar quarter by the tenth day of the succeeding calendar
quarter. Where lapses occur in maintaining the public file, neither the
negligent acts nor omissions of station employees or agents, nor the
subsequent remedial actions undertaken by the licensee, excuse or
nullify a licensee's rule violation.[^2]

On August 4, 2006, you filed a license renewal application (FCC Form
303-S) for station KMIR-TV, Palm Springs, California (File No.
BRCT-20060804AFU). In response to Section IV, Question 3 of that
application, you certify that, during the previous license term, station
KMIR-TV failed to place in its public inspection file at the appropriate
times, all of the documentation required by Section 73.3526 of the
Commission's Rules. In Exhibit 17, you state that in the course of
preparing the instant application, it was discovered that TV
issues/programs lists for the third and fourth quarters of 2001 were
missing from the public inspection file. You indicate that these were
subsequently placed in the public file.

Although we do not rule out more severe sanctions for violations of this
nature in the future, based upon the record before us we have determined
that an admonition is appropriate at this time. Therefore, based upon
the facts and circumstances before us, we ADMONISH you for the admitted
violations of Section 73.3526(e)(11)(i) of the Rules described in
station KMIR-TV's renewal application.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, a copy of this Letter shall be sent by
First Class and Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested to Journal
Broadcast Corporation at the address listed above, and to its counsel,
Mace J. Rosenstein, Esquire, Covington & Burling LLP, 1201 Pennsylvania
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004.

Sincerely,

> Barbara A. Kreisman

Chief, Video Division

Media Bureau

[^1]: *See* 47 C.F.R. § 73.3526.

[^2]: *See Padre Serra Communications, Inc.*, 14 FCC Rcd 9709 (1999)
    (*citing Gaffney Broadcasting, Inc.*, 23 FCC 2d 912, 913 (1970) and
    *Eleven Ten Broadcasting Corp*., 33 FCC 706 (1962)); *Surrey Range
    Limited Partnership*, 71 RR 2d 882 (FOB 1992).
**[Exhibit(400)-280.2]{.underline}**

**SAMPLE MEMORANDUM TO STOP PAYMENT OF MONEY DUE A SEPARATING EMPLOYEE**

\[signatory office to enter date\]

MEMORANDUM FOR ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, TRANSACTIONAL PROCESSING

FROM: \[SAC Name\]

Special Agent-in-Charge, \[Division Name\]

SUBJECT: Request to Stop Payment of Money Due a Separating Employee

Case Number:

Theft/Embezzlement Case

I request that the servicing personnel office consider initiating a stop
payment of salary and benefits due to the following separating employee:

Employee's Name:

Position:

Business Unit and Office:

Social Security Number:

Date of Birth:

\[Briefly describe the crime\]

Title 5 U.S.C. § 5512(a) directs that the pay of a disbursing or
accountable officer be withheld until he or she has accounted for and
paid to the Treasury all sums for which he or she is liable. Under these
circumstances, § 5512 (a) may authorize the setoff of a separating
employee\'s unpaid salary, unused annual leave, retirement fund
contributions, annuity payments and similar payments. The procedures set
forth in IRM 0290.3, Payroll/Processing Handbook, should be followed.

For further information, please contact Special Agent \[Name\] at
\[Telephone Number\].
**Example #4 Yingying Cement Plant**

**Data for a Plant in China with a Payback Period of 3 years for Energy
Efficiency Measures**

**You are trying to reduce energy consumption at your plant. You can put
together a package of measures as long as the total payback period is
less than 3 years for the whole package. Using this limitation, try to
make your facility as efficient as possible.**

Raw Materials used at your plant (tonnes/year):

Limestone: 2,000,000

Gypsum: 200,000

Blast furnace slag: 500,000

Other slags: 100,000

Fly ash: 200,000

Sewage waste: 250,000

You preblend and crush all of your raw materials.

You dry all your sewage in addition to all your slags and you grind all
your slags and fly ash before blending.

You have only one dry hollow kiln which produces 1,500,000 tonnes/year
of clinker.

You produce the following cement types:

100,000 tonnes/year of pure Portland cement of the lowest quality

900,000 tonnes/year of 32.5 common Portland cement

500,000 tonnes/year of 32.5 and 52.5 slag cement (1,000,000 tonnes
total)

300,000 tonnes/year of 52.5 fly ash cement

You have only one milling line, all ball mills. You grind 511,500
tonnes/year of coal.

Your quarry is located off site.

You generate 10% of the electricity you use on site. All of this is
generated through coal, no waste heat is currently are used to produce
this electricity.

You use purchased and self-produced electricity for the following
processes (kWh/year):

Preblending: 6,000,000

Crushing: 2,000,000

Grinding: 90,000,000

Additive crushing and grinding: 40,000,000

Fuel grinding: 20,000,000

Homogenization: 2,000,000

Kiln preheaters: 20,000,000

Clinker cooler: 60,000,000

Cement grinding: 150,000,000

Other conveying and auxiliaries: 28,000,000

Other electricity: 4,000,000

You use coal for the following processes:

Additive drying: 44,500,000 kg of cleaned coal

Precalciners: 112,000,000 kg of cleaned coal

Kiln: 350,000,000 kg of cleaned coal

You pay 0.6RMB/kWh for electricity and 550 RMB/tonne for coal.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

December 15, 2004 Bruce Romano at (202) 418-2124

**FCC AMENDS RULES TO PERMIT NEW WIDEBAND UNLICENSED DEVICES AND AFFIRMS
RULES TO AUTHORIZE THE DEPLOYMENT OF**

**ULTRA-WIDEBAND TECHNOLOGY**

Washington, D.C. -- The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) adopted a
*Second Report and Order and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order* in ET
Docket No. 98-153 that will further facilitate the introduction of new
unlicensed wideband devices in the 6 GHz, 17 GHz and 24 GHz bands. These
devices will include radar systems to improve automotive safety and
tracking systems for personnel location, such as hospital patients and
emergency rescue crews, as well as for functions such as inventory
control.

The Commission previously established regulations that permit the
marketing and operation of certain types of new products incorporating
ultra-wideband (UWB) technology. UWB technology can be employed for a
vast array of new applications that have the potential to provide
significant benefits for public safety, businesses and consumers. Partly
in response to petitions for reconsideration of the *First Report and
Order* in this proceeding, the Commission, proposed further changes to
the Part 15 regulations for wideband devices.

In today's *2^nd^ Report and Order*, the Commission amended its rules
for general Part 15 unlicensed operations that use wide bandwidths but
are not classified as UWB devices under its rules. It increased the peak
power limits and reduced the unwanted emission levels for 3 frequency
bands that were already available for unlicensed operation: 5925-7250
MHz, 16.2-17.2 GHz, and 23.12-29 GHz, and indicated that higher peak
power limits in these bands would facilitate wideband operations such as
short range communications, collision avoidance, inventory control and
tracking systems. The Commission also amended its measurement procedures
to permit frequency hopped, swept frequency, and gated systems operating
within these bands to be measured in their normal operating mode.

In light of these changes to the general Part 15 provisions, the
Commission did not make any major changes to the current UWB technical
requirements, indicating that changes to these rules at this early stage
could be disruptive to current industry product development efforts. The
Commission made only a minor change to the measurement procedure applied
to gated UWB vehicular radar systems.

In the *2^nd^ Memorandum Opinion and Order*, the Commission dismissed
the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the Satellite Industry
Association, stating that it would continue to monitor the situation in
the 4 GHz band, and denied the Petition for Reconsideration filed by
Cingular, Inc. It reaffirmed the decisions regarding UWB adopted in the
*First Report and Order* in this proceeding.

Action by the Commission December 15, 2004, by *Second Report and Order
and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order* in ET 98-153 (FCC 04-285).
Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, Martin and Adelstein.

OET Contact: John Reed, Telephone: (202) 418-2455, E-mail:
john.reed@fcc.gov

ET Docket No. 98-153

-   FCC --
PUBLIC NOTICE![](media/image1.png){width="0.6541666666666667in"
height="0.6604166666666667in"}

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

445 12th Street, S.W.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 **DA 99-1794**

News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet:
http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov

**Released: September 2, 1999**

**WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU**

**COMMERCIAL WIRELESS DIVISION**

**DISMISSES REQUEST**

On March 24, 1998, Silver Palm Communications, Inc., (Silver Palm) filed
an Emergency Request for Set Aside of its Conditional Grant and Return
of the 800 MHz EA Application to Pending Status (Request) until the
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) released a public notice
commencing the relocation period for incumbents in the Upper 200
channels of the 800 MHz band.

On December 4, 1998, the Bureau released a public notice (relocation
notice), which announced a time period for the relocation of incumbents
in the upper 200 channels by Economic Area (EA) licensees.[^1] The
release of the relocation notice renders Silver Palm's Request moot.

Action by Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau.

For further information, contact Don Johnson, Commercial Wireless
Division at (202) 418-7240.

[^1]: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) Announces the
    Commencement of the Voluntary

    Negotiation Period for the Relocation of Incumbent Licensees in the
    800 MHz Band, *Public Notice*,

    DA 98-2434, released December 4, 1998.
NY F87044

May 26, 2000

CLA-2-65:RR:NC:3:353 F87044

CATEGORY: Classification

TARIFF NO.: 6505.90.2060

Ms. Ronda Lawry

US JHI Corp.

8612 Fairway Place

Middleton, WI 53562

RE: The tariff classification of a hat from China.

Dear Ms. Lawry:

In your letter dated May 12, 2000 you requested a classification ruling.

The submitted sample, style GGHA-00 named Girl School Outfit Hat, is a
cargo-style hat composed of 100% woven cotton fabric. The hat has a flat
top crown and a 2" brim.

The applicable subheading for the Girl School Outfit Hat, style GGHA-00
will be 6505.90.2060, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTS), which provides for "Hats and other headgear, knitted or
crocheted, or made up from lace, felt or other textile fabric, in the
piece (but not in strips), whether or not lined or trimmed; hair-nets of
any material, whether or not lined or trimmed: Other: Of cotton, flax or
both: Not knitted: Certified hand-loomed and folklore products; and
headgear of cotton, Other." The duty rate will be 7.7% ad valorem.

Style GGHA-00 falls within textile category designation 359. Based upon
international textile trade agreements products of China are subject to
quota and the requirement of a visa.

The designated textile and apparel categories and their quota and visa
status are the result of international agreements that are subject to
frequent renegotiations and changes. To obtain the most current
information, we suggest that you check, close to the time of shipment,
the [U.S. Customs Service Textile Status Report]{.underline}, an
internal issuance of the U.S. Customs Service, which is available at the
Customs Web site at www.customs.gov. In addition, the designated textile
and apparel categories may be subdivided into parts. If so, visa and
quota requirements applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected
and should also be verified at the time of shipment.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the
Customs Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be
provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is
imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, contact
National Import Specialist Kenneth Reidlinger at 212-637-7084.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Swierupski

Director,

National Commodity

Specialist Division
# ![](media/image1.png){width="1.1881944444444446in" height="0.8770833333333333in"} ![](media/image2.png){width="1.5625in" height="0.4375in"} ![](media/image3.png){width="2.1145833333333335in" height="0.4479166666666667in"}

# 

# PROGRAM

## Rebuilding Iraq: Subcontracting Opportunities Regional Conference

April 28, 2004

COEX Intercontinental Hotel (Harmony Ball Room)

Seoul, Korea

**Registration (0730 -- 0830)**

**Morning Session (0830 - 1215)**\
***Opening Ceremony***

-   *Opening Remarks*

> Young Su Han, Senior Executive Director,
>
> Korea International Trade Association

-   *Welcoming Remarks*

> Park Bong Kyu, Director General for Trade Policy,
>
> Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy

-   *Responding Remarks*

> Mark C. Minton, Charge d\'Affaires,
>
> U.S. Embassy Korea   

#### US Government Assistance to International Businesses in Iraq

-   William Lash, Assistant Secretary and Head Iraq Reconstruction Task
    Force, U.S. Department of Commerce

##### "Rebuilding Iraq" Program Management Office Strategic Overview

-   Jonathan Thompson, Director of Communications,

> Program Management Office, Coalition Provisional Authority

***Contracting Process: Overview and Progress***

-   Senior Army Acquisition Official

***Open Forum: Q&As***

***Subcontracting Opportunities and Bidding Process***

-   Prime Contractor (1) \-\-- Parsons

-   Prime Contractor (2) \-\-- Lucent Technologies World Services, Inc.

**Lunch (1215 - 1315)**

No Host Lunch

# 

# Afternoon Session (1315 - 1730)

### *Subcontracting Opportunities and Bidding Process*

-   Prime Contractor (3) \-\-- Louis Berger Group, Inc.

-   Prime Contractor (4) \-\-- Fluor-AMEC

-   Prime Contractor (5) \-\-- Foster Wheeler UK

#### Korean Government's Support for Korean Companies Doing Business in Iraq

-   Officials from the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, the
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the Ministry of
    Construction and Transportation

***Ways to Advance Into The Iraqi Reconstruction Market and***

***Case Study: Korean Company Success in Iraqi Reconstruction Project***

-   President, KOTRA Baghdad Office (tentative) and Representative,
    Overseas Team, Hyundai Construction (tentative)

#### Open Forum: Q&As

#### Close
**KEY TO** **STATUS REPORT OF (P.L. 83-566) and (P.L. 78-534) AUTHORIZED
WATERSHED PROJECTS**

**(Includes one P.L.639 project)**

**AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2000**

**OPER Date project was approved for operations**

**status Status of the project such as:**

-   **Blank: Active Projects** - Projects that are currently in
    implementation.

-   **C: Completed projects** - All planned elements contained in the
    work plan have been implemented. Operation and maintenance is being
    carried out for all enduring measures.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **I: Inactive** **Project** - An administrative category for
    authorized projects in which there has been no implementation for a
    period of ten or more years.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **P: Project life is over** -- Completed projects in which the
    evaluated life of all works of improvement has been met or exceeded

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **R: Reopened** **Projects** -- Completed projects that have been
    reopened to conduct necessary remedial work or to supplement the
    plan.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **D: Deauthorized** -- Authorized projects in which no works of
    improvement have been implemented; and it has been determined that
    no implementation will occur, due to either the lack of technical
    feasibility or factors that limit the ability of the project
    sponsor(s) to perform their responsibilities

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **T: Terminated \--** PL-534 watershed plans that were terminated
    during the planning process or at some point prior to being
    authorized for operations.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   **W: Withdrawn \--** PL-534 requests for planning assistance that
    were withdrawn prior to the completion of a watershed plan.

**Date Change Date project last changed status**

**Purposes:**

**fp Flood prevention**

**dr Drainage**

**ir Irrigation**

**wc Water conservation**

**rw Rural water**

**oa- Other agriculture**

**wq Water quality**

**rc Recreation**

**fw Fish and wildlife**

**mi Municipal and industrial water supply**

**wp Watershed protection**

**[Watershed Protection Subpurposes:]{.underline}**

**wper Watershed protection (erosion)**

**wpwq - Watershed protection (water quality)**

**wpwc - Watershed protection (water conservation)**

**wpfw - Watershed protection (fish and wildlife)**

**hua 4-digit hydrologic unit area number**
96M02/14/07

S554-96M.doc

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Use on projects as appropriate.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Section 554. - REINFORCING STEEL**

**Construction Requirements**

**554.05 Bending.** [Add the following to the first
paragraph:]{.underline}

Do not shear reinforcing bars in bundles.

**554.07 Epoxy Coated Reinforcing Steel.** [Delete the fifth paragraph
and substitute the following]{.underline}:

Field repairs will not be allowed on bars that have severely-damaged
coatings. Replace bars with severely-damaged coatings. A
severely-damaged coating is defined as a bar where the sum of all areas
covered with patching material, including overlaps, exceeds five percent
of the total surface area of the bar. This limit on repaired damage
coating does not include sheared or cut ends that are coated with
patching material. Coat mechanical splices after splice installation
according to AASHTO M 284M for patching damaged epoxy coatings.

**554.08 Placing and Fastening.** [Delete the first sentence of the
first paragraph and substitute the following]{.underline}:

Place, fasten, and support the bars according to the CRSI *Manual of
Standard Practice*. Use precast concrete blocks or metal supports.

**554.09 Splices.** [Add the following:]{.underline}

Mechanical splices, at locations where approved for use or at locations
shown on the plans, may be made using the following devices:

> • Vertical column/shaft reinforcement may be mechanically butt spliced
> using the **Bar-Lock MBT** coupler as produced by Splice Sleeve North
> America, or an approved alternative.
>
> • Other reinforcement, including spirals, may be spliced using the
> **Bar- Lock MBT** coupler as produced by Splice Sleeve North America,
> the **OS** Splice Clip as produced by Splice Sleeve North America, or
> the **Quick-Wedge** as produced by Erico Concrete Construction
> Products, or an approved alternate.

Approval of an alternative splicing design will be based on technical
data, including test results, and other necessary proof of satisfactory
performance submitted by the manufacturer. Criteria for approval is as
follows:

> • The total slip of the reinforcing bars within the splice after
> loading in tension to 207 MPa and relaxing to 21 MPa shall not exceed
> 254 micrometers for bars No. 43 or smaller as measured between gage
> points clear of the splice.
>
> • Acceptance on Washington DOT OR Caltrans \"Approved Products List\"
> will be considered in reviewing submittal for use on this project.

Splice components shall have a clear coverage of not less than 40 mm
measured from the surface of the concrete to the outside face of the
splice component.

Provide 600 mm minimum distance between butt splices of adjacent bars as
measured along the longitudinal axis of the shaft/column.

All splicing procedures shall be in accordance with the manufacturer\'s
standard equipment, jigs, clamps, and other required accessories.
Procedures used in making the mechanical butt splices shall be as
recommended by the manufacturer and approved by the CO.
** **

** **

** **

** **

## For Immediate Release 

** **

**[Don't Let Your Home Become Fuel for a Wildfire]{.underline}**

** **

Protect your home from wildfire**.** Learn steps you can take to create
a survivable environment, making it safe to live, work and play.

 

Clearing flammable materials from around your home creates a defensible,
survivable space when fire comes to your neighborhood. Maintaining a 30
to 50- foot buffer around your home and use of fire resistant
landscaping reduces the chance of wildfire spreading to your home.

 

Please follow these guidelines:

 

-   Remove pine debris from your roof, gutters and from around your
    home.

-   Install spark arresters on chimneys.

-   Keep tree limbs back 15 feet from your chimneys.

-   Remove brush a minimum of 30 feet from any structure.

-   Move woodpiles 30 feet away from any structure.

-   Remove combustible storage from under decks and eaves.

-   Prune trees 10 feet from the ground.

-   Ensure your address is visible and distinguishable from the street,
    both day and night.

 

For more information contact your local fire department.

![](media/image1.wmf){width="2.7465277777777777in"
height="1.6333333333333333in"}

** **
Table 10.\
The Estimated Risk of Childhood Leukemia Associated with Blood Levels of
Volatile Organic Compounds (μg/L)[^\*^](#note1) for Case Children and
Families Compared with Control Children and Families Living in Churchill
County

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            **Case vs. Comparison                               **Case vs. Comparison       
                            (Child)**                                           (Families)[^†^](#note2)**   
  ------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------
  **VOC [^‡^](#note3)**     **Odds                 ***P*-Value**[^║^](#note5)   **Odds Ratio[^§^](#note4)** ***P*-Value**[^║^](#note5)
                            Ratio[^§^](#note4)**                                                            

  **1,4-Dichlorobenzene**   NC[^¶^](#note6)        NC                           1.33                        0.28

  **Ethylbenzene**          2.67                   0.04                         1.14                        0.56

  **m-/p-Xylene**           0.80                   0.74                         0.87                        0.60

  **O-Xylene**              1.45                   0.47                         1.01                        0.98

  **Styrene**               1.21                   0.62                         1.25                        0.30

  **Tetrachloroethylene**   0.32                   0.19                         0.38                        0.01

  **Toluene**               0.77                   0.70                         1.12                        0.67
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[]{#note1 .anchor}\* Nanogram per gram lipid

> []{#note2 .anchor}† Family members include children and their
> parents/guardians.
>
> []{#note3 .anchor}‡ Volatile organic compounds
>
> []{#note4 .anchor}§ The estimated relative risk of leukemia associated
> with one standard error of the geometric mean increase in the blood or
> urine level of each chemical. Odds ratios are not reported if fewer
> than 60% of cases and controls had detectable levels of the chemical
> in their blood or urine.
>
> []{#note5 .anchor}^║^ The *P*-value estimates the probability that the
> deviation of the odds ratio from 1.0 (no difference in risk) is due to
> chance. A *P*-value less than 0.05 suggests that chance is unlikely to
> explain the deviation.
>
> []{#note6 .anchor}¶ Not calculated. Less than 60% of the study
> population had detectable levels of this chemical.
>
> **The VOCs that were analyzed in the Churchill County investigation
> but that were detected in fewer than 60% of the participants were:**

Trichloroethylene

Benzene

Carbon tetrachloride

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

2,5-Dimethylfuran
+----------------------------+------------------+---+-------------------+
| National Park Service      | Mount Rainier NP |   | Tahoma Woods,     |
|                            |                  |   | Star Route        |
| U.S. Department of the     | Use the complete |   |                   |
| Interior                   | site name here   |   | Ashford, WA       |
|                            | (e.g. Palo Alto  |   | 98304-9751        |
|                            | Battlefield      |   |                   |
|                            | Historic Site).  |   | 360-569-2211      |
|                            |                  |   | phone             |
|                            |                  |   |                   |
|                            |                  |   | 360-569-xxxx fax  |
+----------------------------+------------------+---+-------------------+

![](media/image1.png){width="0.5597222222222222in"
height="0.7201388888888889in"}

**Mount Rainier National Park** News Release

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Use a "short-hand" version of the site name here (e.g. Palo Alto
  Battlefield not Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Site).

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

For Immediate Release

Lee Taylor 360-569-2211x.6131

RAINIER IS OPEN TO HIKERS AND SNOW SHOERS

November 27, 2006\--Although all roads remain closed at Mount Rainier
National Park, there are several areas where you can hike, snowshoe or
cross-country ski. From the closed park gate on Highway 123 you can
snowshoe or ski the road towards Ohanapecosh. You can also park at the
junction of Highway 410 and the Crystal Mountain Road and explore
Highway 410.

"While we work to repair damaged roads, we're glad folks can still come
and enjoy Mount Rainier," said Superintendent Dave Uberuaga. "For
outdoor enthusiasts the mountain offers some good options even with the
roads closed."

The Carbon River entrance offers a great day hike for those interested
in seeing the destruction wrought by flooding. Sections of the road are
still intact and provide access to majestic old growth forest. A rough
foot trail skirts the chasm that was once the Carbon River Road about a
mile inside the park entrance.

It is not safe to enter the park on the Nisqually Road due to ongoing
power line and road repair work. However, rangers lead walks to Sunshine
Point, where raging torrents of water wiped out both the road and
campground. Walks depart from the Nisqually Entrance at 10:00 a.m. and
2:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday.

-NPS-
**Mr. John W. Fountain, on behalf on blind daughter, Indiana: Opposition
to Petitions for Reconsideration**

**From:** John Fountain \<jfountai@kiva.net\>

**To:** \<access@fcc.gov\>

**Date:** Tue, Oct 31, 2000 11:53 AM

**Subject:** Video Description

The following is a copy of a letter sent to the FCC:

October 31, 2000

From:

John W. Fountain

2066 N Co Rd 50E

Paoli, IN 47454

To:

Magalie Salas, Secretary

The Federal Communications Commission

445 12th Street SW

Washington, DC 20554

Subject: OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE REPORTED

ORDER ON VIDEO DESCRIPTION

Docket No. 99‑339

I appreciate the FCCs courageous vote requiring networks to begin

providing essential information services to people who are blind and

visually impaired. My daughter, who is totally blind, has had the

opportunity to view certain videos that have been transcribed. This has

opened a whole new concept for her to enjoy movies on the same basis as

the rest of her family. I have told her that she will have the same

capabilities afforded to her on television in the near future. For those

who would benefit greatly, I encourage the FCC to remain steadfast with

the decision that has been made.

I might also point out that the petitioners have not provided any new

information which was not already known at the time of the FCC ruling.

Sincerely,

John W. Fountain
**Breakout Group 5B**

[Question 1]{.underline}) Was our explanation of the risk-ranking method
understood? How can we improve its clarity?

-   More no than yes.

-   Yes, it is clear.

-   Who are the risk managers?

-   What do they need or looking for?

-   Who would it include?

    Scoring

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   How do you do this without data?

-   Bottom up approach

    -   Some concerns

-   Absence of data

    -   Need to do research rather than "expert" opinion

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Consider consumer confidence (not science)

    -   Feed may not be a control point

    -   Need to look at other factors

        [Question 2]{.underline}) Do you agree with the risk-ranking
        method?

[Question 3]{.underline}) Do you agree with how we plan to use the
risk-ranking method?

**Ranking method and Question #3 tied together.**

-   no data

-   from top down no data

-   Industry -- no; more scientific data is needed

-   Each ingredient pair- sampling is expensive

-   Evaluate thru a process (HACCP) on reality

-   Will variables (other) be considered in the risk ranking? Ex.
    Transportation, Environment

-   Hazards that were brought up, are they really a risk?

-   Absent data doesn't mean there is a problem

-   Includes both animals and human risks

-   Looking for other methods on how to evaluate risks

-   Establish ground rules

-   Research vs. experts

-   How does the consumer separate out the risk by specie, contaminant?

-   No alternate methods are suggested at this time.

-   Top to bottom would be preferred rather than bottom up as long as
    there is significant data to assess the risk.

-   Broad based research

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Comp data set.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Need better communication between industry and FDA.

    -   Focus on what industry is doing or where they are spending
        resources.

    -   List ranking is just an approach.

[Question 4]{.underline}) Are there methods other than risk-ranking that
should be considered for prioritizing which hazards should be addressed?

-   Focus on current program and identify weakness. What are advantages
    and disadvantages?

-   Test pilot one ingredient pair risk (Ex: 1% not doing what they are
    doing)

-   Assign High or Low to risks

-   No numbering ranking

-   Breakdown the comprehensive by segments on risks.

-   AFSS -- survey industry on programs that are ready out there.

-   Third party audits

[Question 4B]{.underline}) What are the alternative methods and what are
their advantages over risk-ranking?

-   No alternative methods currently.

[Question 5]{.underline}) We have modified the definition of risk-based.
Is the new definition more understandable?

-   Yes, as clear as the first.

-   Need to understand the self-regulation programs and industry needs
    to increase communication to let agency know what is currently out
    there.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center

Region 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN 61 Forsyth St. SW

Office of External Affairs Atlanta, GA 30303-3104

![](media/image1.png){width="1.1458333333333333in" height="0.75in"}

[Environmental News]{.smallcaps}

PHONE: (404)562-8327 FAX: (404)562-8335

**For Immediate Release Contact: Dawn Harris-Young**

**Phone: (404) 562-8421**

**[EPA Recognizes Organizations for Improving Energy Efficiency and
Protecting the Environment]{.smallcaps}**

(Atlanta, Georgia B November 17, 2004) BToday the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) recognized Food Lion in Salisbury, North
Carolina and Parkway Properties in Jackson, Mississippi as two of the
2004 ENERGY STAR Leaders for demonstrating superior energy management
and environmental leadership.

The groups recognized today have established a portfolio-wide energy
efficiency baseline, a critical step in successful energy management.
Parkway Properties is a commercial real estate entity with 62 properties
located in 11 states. Parkway Properties has taken the first step toward
improving its energy efficiency by entering its baseline energy data and
is poised to realize significant energy savings in the future. Food
Lion, with 1,200 grocery stores in 11 states, has earned recognition for
achieving an energy rating of 75 or better for its entire building
portfolio. This significant achievement demonstrates Food Lion's
commitment to superior energy performance. By managing their energy
well, ENERGY STAR Leaders are showing leadership, improving their
financial performance, and helping to protect the environment.

ENERGY STAR partners who demonstrate continuous improvement in energy
efficiency -- not just in individual buildings, but organization-wide --
qualify for EPA's new ENERGY STAR Leaders recognition. EPA designates
ENERGY STAR Leaders based on an organization's actual energy efficiency,
as measured using EPA's energy performance rating system. The rating
system provides an objective, standardized approach for measuring the
efficiency of an entire building, or building portfolio, on a 100 point
scale. Over 19,000 buildings across the country have used the rating
system to help manage their energy use and reduce costs.

EPA introduced ENERGY STAR in 1992 as a voluntary, market-based
partnership to reduce air pollution through increased energy efficiency.
Today, ENERGY STAR offers businesses and consumers energy efficient
solutions to save energy, money and help protect the environment for
future generations. More than 8,000 organizations have become ENERGY
STAR partners and are committed to improving the energy efficiency of
businesses, products, and homes. For more information and a complete
list of 2004 Energy Star Leaders, please visit
[http://www.energystar.gov](http://www.energystar.gov/) or call
toll-free 1-888-STAR-YES.
**DA 03-2575**

**August 1, 2003**

**WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU EXTENDS TRIBAL LANDS BIDDING CREDIT
CERTIFICATION DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN APPLICANTS.**

On March 14, 2003, the Commission issued a *Second Report and Order and
Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking* in WT Docket No.
99-266[^1] in which it extended, from 90 days to 180 days, the period in
which applicants seeking tribal lands bidding credits must file certain
certifications.[^2] In extending the certification deadline to 180 days,
the Commission concluded that the 90-day time frame made it difficult
for applicants to qualify for the bidding credit.[^3] That rule change
became effective on July 1, 2003.

There are, however, certain applicants that filed their FCC Form 601
applications prior to July 1, 2003, but whose initial 90-day
certification period has not yet elapsed (specifically, the winning
bidders in Auction Numbers 46, 48 and 49 that indicated an intent to
seek a tribal lands bidding credit on their FCC Forms 601). We conclude
that it is in the public interest to grant a limited waiver of the
90-day deadline for such applicants in light of the Commission's
determination that 90 days may not be a sufficient period of time in
which to obtain certifications. Accordingly, we extend to 180 days, the
certification deadline for those applicants that filed prior to July 1,
2003, and that are currently still within their initial 90-day
certification period.[^4]

For further information, contact Denise Walter, Commercial Wireless
Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at 202-418-0620 or
<denise.walter@fcc.gov>.

Action by the Deputy Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau.

[^1]: Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT
    Docket No. 99-266, *Second Report and Order and Second Further
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking*, 18 FCC Rcd 4775 (2003) (*Second
    Report and Order*).

[^2]: Following the filing of its long-form application (FCC Form 601)
    filing deadline, an applicant seeking a tribal lands bidding credit
    must provide certification from the tribal government(s) that: (1)
    it will allow the bidder to site facilities and provide service on
    its tribal land(s), in accordance with our rules; (2) it has not and
    will not enter into an exclusive contract with the applicant
    precluding entry by other carriers, and will not unreasonably
    discriminate against any carrier; and (3) its tribal land is a
    qualifying tribal land as defined in our rules, i.e., an area that
    has a telephone penetration rate at or below 70 percent. The
    applicant must also file a certification that it will comply with
    the bidding credit build-out requirement, and that it will consult
    with the tribal government regarding the siting of facilities and
    deployment of service on the tribal land. *See* 47 C.F.R. §
    1.2110(f)(3).

[^3]: *See* *Second Report and Order*, 18 FCC Rcd at 4779, para. 10.

[^4]: Certain waiver requests regarding the tribal lands bidding credit
    are currently pending. This action does not affect the merits of
    such waiver requests.
**UNITED STATES OF AMERICA**

**[NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD]{.smallcaps}**

**[OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES]{.smallcaps}**

\* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \*
\* \* \* \* \* \*

[ROBERT A. STURGELL]{.smallcaps}

[ACTING ADMINISTRATOR]{.smallcaps} \*

Federal Aviation Administration \*

\*

Complainant, \*

\* Docket No.: CP-182

v\. \*

\*

LUKE A. FRAZIER, \*

\*

Respondent. \*

\*

\* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \* \*
\* \* \* \* \* \*

**[NOTICE OF HEARING]{.underline}**

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a hearing on the above-entitled case will
be held before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge at ***U.S. Tax
Court, Timberlake Federal Annex, Courtroom 1201, 501 East Polk Street***
in the City of ***TAMPA, FLORIDA*** on the ***3^rd^ & 4^th^*** day of
***March 2009*** beginning at ***9:30 a.m.*** of that day.

**[NOTICE: CONTINUANCES WILL BE NOT GRANTED EXCEPT ON WRITTEN MOTION AND
FOR COMPELLING AND UNFORESEEABLE GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT
GOOD CAUSE FOR A CONTINUANCE EXISTS WHEN YOU RECEIVE THIS NOTICE OF
HEARING, YOU MUST FILE YOUR MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS.
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT CIRCUMSTANCES CONSTITUTING GOOD CAUSE FOR
CONTINUANCE HAS OCCURRED AFTER ISSUANCE OF THE NOTICE OF HEARING, YOU
MUST FILE YOUR MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE IMMEDIATELY. THE FACT THAT
OPPOSING COUNSEL HAS NO OBJECTION TO A CONTINUANCE REQUEST WILL NOT, IN
THE ABSENCE OF A GOOD CAUSE, PROVIDE A BASIS FOR CONTINUANCE. IN THE
EVENT THAT A SETTLEMENT IS REACHED IN THIS CASE, PLEASE NOTIFY THIS
OFFICE IMMEDIATELY.]{.smallcaps}**

The parties are expected to be present and to present testimony and
witnesses, if any, in support of their positions. **At the hearing, the
parties shall provide a copy of each exhibit for the Judge's use at the
bench and shall exchange copies of all exhibits they intend to offer
into evidence at the hearing. The Board will not provide copies of
exhibits to parties after the hearing.**

Dated at Washington, DC, this ***16^th^ day of December 2008.***

[\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_]{.underline}

WILLIAM A. POPE, II.
**§21.8016 Nonduplication of benefits.**

\(a\) *Election of benefitschapter 35*. An eligible child may not
receive benefits concurrently under 38 U.S.C. chapter 35 and under this
subpart. If the child is eligible for both benefits, he or she must
elect in writing which benefit to receive. (Authority: 38 U.S.C.
1804(e)(1), 1814, 1824)

\(b\) *Reelections of benefitschapter 35*. An eligible child receiving
benefits under this subpart or under 38 U.S.C. chapter 35 may change his
or her election at any time. A reelection between benefits under this
subpart and under 38 U.S.C. chapter 35 must be prospective, however, and
may not result in an eligible child receiving benefits under both
programs for the same period of training. (Authority: 38 U.S.C.
1804(e)(1), 1814, 1824)

\(c\) *Length of benefits under multiple programschapter 35*. The
aggregate period for which an eligible child may receive assistance
under this subpart and under 38 U.S.C. chapter 35 together may not
exceed 48 months of full-time training or the part-time equivalent.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804(e)(2), 1814)

\(d\) *Nonduplication of benefits under 38 U.S.C. 1804 and 1814*. An
eligible child may only be provided one program of vocational training
under this subpart. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1804, 1814, 1824)

*Next Section is §21.8020*
UNSCANNABLE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DMS
DOCKET

# DMS Docket Number: FAA-2007-0193 

# Directorate Identifier: 2007-NE-43-AD

# [Name/ Description of Unscannable Item]{.underline}

**General Electric Service Bulletin No. CF6-80C2 S/B 72-1121, dated
January 23, 2004**

**\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_**

SERVICE INFORMATION MAY BE EXAMINED AT:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

> For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
> 202 741 6030; or go to:\
> <http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html>
>
> or

###### 

###### Federal Aviation Administration

**New England Region**

**Office of the Regional Counsel**

**12 New England Executive Park**

**Burlington, MA 01803**

by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays
![](media/image1.jpeg){width="6.371527777777778in"
height="0.9909722222222223in"}

> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>
> May 18, 2004

####### Commission to Seek New VA Under Secretary for Health

> WASHINGTON \-- Secretary of Veterans Affairs Anthony J. Principi today
> announced the formation of a 10-member commission to recommend
> candidates for the post of Under Secretary for Health within the
> Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
>
> \"We are seeking a proven physician-leader with strong managerial and
> clinical skills, plus a firm commitment to veterans," Principi said.
> "Our goal is to build upon our past successes to enhance the quality
> of care for our nation's veterans.\"
>
> VA\'s Under Secretary for Health directs nearly 200,000 full- and
> part-time employees \-- including 132,000 direct care providers \-- in
> one of the largest health care systems in the world. VA offers care at
> more than 1,300 sites nationwide to nearly 5 million veterans.
>
> Under a formula set by law, the search commission\'s composition
> reflects interests in such areas as clinical care, research and
> education.
>
> The position of Under Secretary for Health is a presidential
> appointment for a term of four years subject to Senate confirmation.
> Under federal law, the search commission must recommend at least three
> candidates. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs will forward the list to
> the President along with any comments by the Secretary.
>
> The commission is expected to make its recommendations by the end of
> July.

\# \# \#

> People wishing to receive e-mail from VA with the latest news releases
> and updated fact sheets can subscribe at the following Internet
> address:
>
> <http://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/opalist_listserv.cfm>

### 

### Department of Veterans Affairs

### 2004 Under Secretary for Health Commission Membership

> Commission Chairperson: Gordon H. Mansfield, Deputy Secretary,
> Department of Veterans Affairs
>
> Linda Burnes Bolton, Dr.PH, RN, FAAN, Chair, National Commission on VA
> Nursing, Los Angeles, Calif.
>
> William Ted Galey, M.D., former Department of Veterans Affairs
> Veterans Integrated Service Network Director, Portland, Ore.
>
> David W. Gorman, Executive Director, Disabled American Veterans,
> Washington, D.C.
>
> Kenneth W. Kizer, M.D., M.P.H., former Under Secretary for Health,
> Washington, D.C.
>
> George E. Thibault, M.D., Chairman, Special Medical Advisory Group,
> Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, Mass.
>
> David N. Tornberg, M.D., M.P.H., Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
> for Clinical and Program Policy, Department of Defense, Falls Church,
> Va.
>
> Sister Patricia Vandenberg, CSC, Eastern U.S. Area Coordinator,
> Sisters of the Holy Cross, Silver Spring, Md.
>
> Robert E. Wallace, Executive Director, Veterans of Foreign Wars,
> Washington, D.C.
>
> Al Zamberlan, former Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Director
> and Medical Center Director, Ann Arbor, Mich.
>
> Commission Executive Secretary**:** Thomas J. Hogan, VA Deputy
> Assistant Secretary for Human Resources