**DOTXX071: DOT eGrants Consolidation**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Exhibit 300: Part I: Summary Information and Justification (All
  Capital Assets)**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **I.A. Overview**                   

                                      

  **1. Date of Submission:**          9/11/2006

  **2. Agency:**                      Department of Transportation

  **3. Bureau:**                      Office of the Secretary

  **4. Name of this Capital Asset:**  DOTXX071: DOT eGrants Consolidation

  **5. Unique Project (Investment)    021-04-04-00-01-1326-00
  Identifier: (For IT investment      
  only, see section 53. For all       
  other, use agency ID system.)**     

  **6. What kind of investment will   Mixed Life Cycle
  this be in FY2008? (Please NOTE:    
  Investments moving to O&M ONLY in   
  FY2008, with Planning/Acquisition   
  activities prior to FY2008 should   
  not select O&M. These investments   
  should indicate their current       
  status.)**                          

  **7. What was the first budget year FY2007
  this investment was submitted to    
  OMB?**                              

  **8. Provide a brief summary and    
  justification for this investment,  
  including a brief description of    
  how this closes in part or in whole 
  an identified agency performance    
  gap:**                              

  The DOT eGrants consolidation       
  effort will automate paper grant    
  processes and reduce the number of  
  Departmental grant systems.         
  Eliminating paper and reducing the  
  number of systems will improve      
  grantor efficiency and minimize     
  system maintenance costs.           
  Currently, grantors create their    
  own spreadsheets to track grant     
  applications, awards and spending.  
  Some grantors spend 25% of their    
  time checking payments. The         
  FY07/FY08 DOT budgets do not        
  increase grantor FTE. Thus,         
  existing personnel must be given    
  better tools to manage the entire   
  grant process. The 1st priority is  
  establishing an interace to         
  Grants.gov. As grantors now         
  download applications from          
  Grants.gov to their workstations,   
  they sometimes do not know where    
  the files reside. Accountability of 
  incoming grant applications is weak 
  at the Agency/Dept levels. The DOT  
  interface to Grants.gov will        
  provide routing to the specific DOT 
  office and/or system as well as     
  establish a central grants database 
  for reporting/accountability. The   
  2nd priority is to automate over 40 
  paper grant processes. Two DOT      
  grant agencies are entirely paper   
  based and all of the others, but    
  one, have a mix of paper and        
  automated systems. Paper grant      
  processes will be at risk with the  
  new A-123 (Internal Controls) and   
  new legislation (HR5060, S2590) for 
  a public facing grant reporting     
  website. A consolidated DOT grants  
  system will standardize grantor     
  steps and help new grantors. Two of 
  the existing grant systems, at the  
  Office of the Secretary level, are  
  available for the entire DOT grant  
  community - GIS (Grant Information  
  System) and GNS (Grant Notification 
  System). GIS collects grant award   
  data and transfers it to the Census 
  FAADS system; GNS transfers grant   
  notices over \$1 million to         
  Congress. Both of these reporting   
  systems contain common data items   
  and need to be combined. Several    
  DOT grant systems are fairly        
  new\--SOAR (FAA) and FedStar        
  (PHMSA), and have not yet come near 
  exhausting their life cycle. It is  
  a better investment to address      
  consolidating and refreshing the    
  modules of older systems as a       
  priority through the proposed GMLoB 
  consortia partnership with HUD.     
  Several DOT grant systems are very  
  small\--GADICS and GMS. They need   
  to be consolidated. Grant payment   
  methods vary and need to be         
  standardardized/streamlined. Faxed  
  invoices for grant payment are not  
  efficient and the number of         
  interfaces to the DOT Delphi system 
  (Federal CoE) needs to be reduced.  
  GMLoB partnership with HUD will     
  benefit both DOT & HUD grantors &   
  grantees.                           

  **9. Did the Agency\'s              Yes
  Executive/Investment Committee      
  approve this request?**             

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what was the    8/16/2006
  date of this approval?**            

  **10. Did the Project Manager       Yes
  review this Exhibit?**              

  **11. Contact information of        
  Project Manager?**                  

  **Name**                            

  Redacted                            

  **Phone Number**                    redacted

  **Email**                           redacted

  **12. Has the agency developed      Yes
  and/or promoted cost effective,     
  energy efficient and                
  environmentally sustainable         
  techniques or practices for this    
  project.**                          

  **   a. Will this investment        Yes
  include electronic assets           
  (including computers)?**            

  **   b. Is this investment for new  No
  construction or major retrofit of a 
  Federal building or facility?       
  (answer applicable to non-IT assets 
  only)**                             

  **      1. If \"yes,\" is an ESPC   
  or UESC being used to help fund     
  this investment?**                  

  **      2. If \"yes,\" will this    
  investment meet sustainable design  
  principles?**                       

  **      3. If \"yes,\" is it         
  designed to be 30% more energy      
  efficient than relevant code?**     

  **13. Does this investment support  Yes
  one of the PMA initiatives?**       

  **   If \"yes,\" check all that     Expanded E-Government, R and D
  apply:**                            Investment Criteria, Budget
                                      Performance Integration, Financial
                                      Performance, Eliminating Improper
                                      Payments

  **   13a. Briefly describe how this The consolidated eGrants project
  asset directly supports the         will address OMB\'s GMLoB
  identified initiative(s)?**         initiative as well as PL 106-107 to
                                      streamline Federal grant making.
                                      Automation of paper processes
                                      improves efficiency, accountability
                                      and financial management.
                                      Consolidation of 10 grant systems
                                      into one minimizes O&M
                                      expenditures. GmLoB CoE partnership
                                      with HUD will cross level grants
                                      expertise and IT resources to
                                      minimize development expenses. The
                                      DOT/HUD CoE will be integrated with
                                      the DOT FMLoB CoE - Delphi.

  **14. Does this investment support  Yes
  a program assessed using the        
  Program Assessment Rating Tool      
  (PART)? (For more information about 
  the PART, visit                     
  www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)**     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does this       Yes
  investment address a weakness found 
  during the PART review?**           

  **   b. If \"yes,\" what is the     All FTA Grant Funding Programs
  name of the PART program assessed   
  by OMB\'s Program Assessment Rating 
  Tool?**                             

  **   c. If \"yes,\" what PART       Adequate
  rating did it receive?**            

  **15. Is this investment for        Yes
  information technology?**           

  **If the answer to Question: \"Is   
  this investment for information     
  technology?\" was \"Yes,\" complete 
  this sub-section. If the answer is  
  \"No,\" do not answer this          
  sub-section.**                      

  **For information technology        
  investments only:**                 

  **16. What is the level of the IT   Level 3
  Project? (per CIO Council PM        
  Guidance)**                         

  **17. What project management       \(1\) Project manager has been
  qualifications does the Project     validated as qualified for this
  Manager have? (per CIO Council PM   investment
  Guidance):**                        

  **18. Is this investment identified No
  as \"high risk\" on the Q4 - FY     
  2006 agency high risk report (per   
  OMB\'s \"high risk\" memo)?**       

  **19. Is this a financial           Yes
  management system?**                

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does this       Yes
  investment address a FFMIA          
  compliance area?**                  

  **      1. If \"yes,\" which        Sections 2 and 4
  compliance area:**                  

  **      2. If \"no,\" what does it   
  address?**                          

  **   b. If \"yes,\" please identify 
  the system name(s) and system       
  acronym(s) as reported in the most  
  recent financial systems inventory  
  update required by Circular A-11    
  section 52**                        

  FTA: TEAM - Transportaion           
  Electronic Award Management system  
  DOTS DELPHI (FMLoB CoE) ECHO FHWA:  
  FMIS - Fiscal Management            
  Information System DELPHI (FMLoB    
  CoE)                                

  **20. What is the percentage        
  breakout for the total FY2008       
  funding request for the following?  
  (This should total 100%)**          

  **Hardware**                        2.000000

  **Software**                        8.000000

  **Services**                        90.000000

  **Other**                            

  **21. If this project produces      Yes
  information dissemination products  
  for the public, are these products  
  published to the Internet in        
  conformance with OMB Memorandum     
  05-04 and included in your agency   
  inventory, schedules and            
  priorities?**                       

  **22. Contact information of        
  individual responsible for privacy  
  related questions:**                

  **Name**                            

  Redacted                            

  **Phone Number**                    redacted

  **Title**                           DOT Privacy Officer

  **E-mail**                          redacted

  **23. Are the records produced by   No
  this investment appropriately       
  scheduled with the National         
  Archives and Records                
  Administration\'s approval?**       
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.B. Summary of Funding**                                           

                                                                        

  **Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by  
  completing the following table. All amounts represent budget          
  authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places.       
  Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated 
  \"Government FTE Cost,\" and should be excluded from the amounts      
  shown for \"Planning,\" \"Full Acquisition,\" and                     
  \"Operation/Maintenance.\" The total estimated annual cost of the     
  investment is the sum of costs for \"Planning,\" \"Full               
  Acquisition,\" and \"Operation/Maintenance.\" For Federal buildings   
  and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy,     
  environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs   
  associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be     
  included in this report.**                                            

  **Table 1: SUMMARY OF SPENDING FOR PROJECT PHASES\                    
  (REPORTED IN MILLIONS)\                                               
  (Estimates for BY+1 and beyond are for planning purposes only and do  
  not represent budget decisions)**                                     
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  --------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
                  **PY - 1\   **PY     **CY     **BY     **BY + 1   **BY + 2   **BY + 3   **BY + 4\  **Total**
                  and\        2006**   2007**   2008**   2009**     2010**     2011**     and\       
                  Earlier**                                                               Beyond**   

  redac                                                                                              

      Budgetary   0.032       0.496    0.948    2.106    redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  Resources                                                                                          

  Acquisition                                                                                        

      Budgetary   11.48       0        3        4.92     redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  Resources                                                                                          

  Subtotal                                                                                           
  Planning &                                                                                         
  Acquisition                                                                                        

      Budgetary   11.512      0.496    3.948    7.026    redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  Resources                                                                                          

  Operations &                                                                                       
  Maintenance                                                                                        

      Budgetary   27.065      6.85     6.799    6.226    redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  Resources                                                                                          

  TOTAL                                                                                              

      Budgetary   38.577      7.346    10.747   13.252   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  Resources                                                                                          

  Government FTE                                                                                     
  Costs                                                                                              

    Budgetary     1.986       1.252    1.379    1.863    redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  Resources                                                                                          

  Number of FTE   0           0.000    1.000    1.000    redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted   redacted
  represented by                                                                                     
  Costs:                                                                                             
  --------------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **Note: For the cross-agency        
  investments, this table should      
  include all funding (both managing  
  partner and partner agencies).      
  Government FTE Costs should not be  
  included as part of the TOTAL       
  represented.**                      

                                      

  **2. Will this project require the  No
  agency to hire additional FTE\'s?** 

  **   a. If \"yes,\" How many and in  
  what year?**                        

  **3. If the summary of spending has 
  changed from the FY2007             
  President\'s budget request,        
  briefly explain those changes:**    

  redacted                            
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.C. Acquisition/Contract Strategy**                                

                                                                        

  **1. Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts 
  and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. 
  Total Value should include all option years for each contract.        
  Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.**  

  **Contracts/Task Orders Table:**                                      
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- -------------- ----------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------------- ------------- ----------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------------- --------------- ----------------
  **Row      **Redacted**   **Type of   **Has the    **If so    **Start     **End date  **Total     **Is this an     **Is it       **Competitively   **What, if    **Is EVM in   **Does the   **Name of  **CO Contact      **Contracting   **If N/A, has
  Number**                  Contract/   contract     what is    date of     of          Value of    Interagency      performance   awarded?**        any,          the           contract     CO**       information       Officer         the agency
                            Task        been         the date   Contract/   Contract/   Contract/   Acquisition?**   based?**                        alternative   contract?**   include the             (phone/email)**   Certification   determined the
                            Order**     awarded?**   of the     Task        Task        Task                                                         financing                   required                                  Level**         CO assigned has
                                                     award? If  Order**     Order**     Order**                                                      option is                   security and                                              the competencies
                                                     not, what                                                                                       being used?**               privacy                                                   and skills
                                                     is the                                                                                                                      clauses?**                                                necessary to
                                                     planned                                                                                                                                                                               support this
                                                     award                                                                                                                                                                                 acquisition?**
                                                     date?**                                                                                                                                                                               

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted

  redacted   redacted       redacted    redacted     redacted   redacted    redacted    redacted    redacted         redacted      redacted          redacted      redacted      redacted     redacted   redacted          redacted        redacted
  ---------- -------------- ----------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------------- ------------- ----------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------------- --------------- ----------------

![](media/image1.png){width="0.20833333333333334in" height="0.15625in"}

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
                                      

  **2. If earned value is not         
  required or will not be a contract  
  requirement for any of the          
  contracts or task orders above,     
  explain why:**                      

  Earned value is not required on     
  contracts for steady state          
  projects.                           

  **3. Do the contracts ensure        Yes
  Section 508 compliance?**           

  **   a. Explain why:**               

  **4. Is there an acquisition plan   Yes
  which has been approved in          
  accordance with agency              
  requirements?**                     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     7/19/2006
  date?**                             

  **   b. If \"no,\" will an           
  acquisition plan be developed?**    

  **      1. If \"no,\" briefly        
  explain why:**                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
  **I.D. Performance Information**                                      

                                                                        

  **In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300,      
  performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to    
  the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the          
  agency\'s mission and strategic goals, and performance measures must  
  be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency\'s      
  strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill.   
  They are the internal and external performance benefits this          
  investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve        
  efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300       
  percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 
  percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable       
  investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do   
  not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or         
  investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved  
  that do not have a quantitative or qualitative measure.**             

  **Agencies must use Table 1 below for reporting performance goals and 
  measures for all non-IT investments and for existing IT investments   
  that were initiated prior to FY 2005. The table can be extended to    
  include measures for years beyond FY 2006.**                          

                                                                        

  **Performance Information Table 1:**                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- ------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------- ------------------
  **Fiscal   **Strategic Goal(s)       **Performance Measure**     **Actual/baseline   **Planned Performance  **Performance
  Year**     Supported**                                           (from Previous      Metric (Target)**      Metric Results
                                                                   Year)**                                    (Actual)**

  2003       FHWA Performance          Decrease the unexpended     The unexpended      Reduce the percentage  The unexpended
             Plan/Organizational       balance for projects with   balance for         of unexpended balance  balance for
             Excellence/Improve        no activity for 12 months   projects with no    to 1.8 billion (10%).  projects with no
             ability to manage for     or more to 1.8 billion (10% activity for 12                            activity for 12
             results. DOT Strategic    reduction)                  months or more is 2                        months or more is
             Plan/Organizational                                   billion dollars.                           1.73 billion
             Excellence/Improved                                                                              dollars.
             Financial Management                                                                             

  2003       FHWA: President\'s        Improve customer            75 % of Customers   Increase the           80% of Customers
             Management Agenda (PMA)   satisfaction to 80%         are satisfied with  percentage of          indicate
             /Improved Financial                                   availability and    satisfied customers    satisfaction with
             Performance E-Government                              functionality of    (State Partners & FHWA availability and
             DOT Strategic                                         FMIS.               Division Office users) functionality of
             Plan/Organizational                                                       to 80%.                the FMIS.
             Excellence/Advance the                                                                           
             Department\'s ability to                                                                         
             manage for results and                                                                           
             achieve the goals of the                                                                         
             PMA                                                                                              

  2003       FTA Strategic Business    Set a 60 day goal for       FY 2002 Federal     Percent of projected   Using the FY 2003
             Plan-Goal 3: Business     awarding a grant after      Transit             closed in 60 days - 80 grant-processing
             Processes and Technology  submission of a completed   Administration FY   percent.               report as an
             FTA Goal 3: Establish     application.                2002 Grant                                 evaluation tool
             effective business                                    processing Report                          FTA reported the
             processes and leverage                                and helpdesk                               average number of
             technology.                                           progress reporting                         days FTA staff
                                                                   statistics                                 took to award a
                                                                                                              complete
                                                                                                              application was 37
                                                                                                              days. 88% of all
                                                                                                              grants processed
                                                                                                              were processed
                                                                                                              with in the 60-day
                                                                                                              time period.

  2003       FTA Goal 1:Attract and    Improve the quality of      FY 2002 helpdesk    Conduct 100 training   FTA provided 108
             retain the best people    applications by providing   progress reporting  sessions for new users training sessions
             :FTA Goal 2: Deliver      TEAM Training to all new    statistics.         of the TEAM            during fiscal year
             products and services     users. Conduct at least 100                     application during the 2003.
             that re valued by FTA     training sessions                               FY 2003 operational    
             customers.                                                                year.                  

  2003       Organizational            Allow states to submit 100% Currently states    The metric will be the This goal was not
             Excellence: For NHTSA to  of grant plans,             submit 90% all      percent of functional  achieved; the
             provide the easiest, most applications, evaluations,  grant plans,        interface points       Agency tried to
             efficient and secure      etc. electronically,        applications,       achieved in the        get States to
             method for states to      through the Grant Tracking  evaluations, etc.   integration of GTS and submit
             apply for and track       System by FY04.             electronically      the E-Grant            electronically,
             grants and funds                                      through the Grant   Application system     and they would
                                                                   Tacking System                             not.

  2003       Organizational Excellence Have all states with        States submit data  The remaining 12       A few states can
                                       compatible systems submit   either through      States should use FMIS not afford to
                                       data through FMIS.          FMIS, State         by the end of FY03     build the
                                                                   designed                                   interface to FMIS.
                                                                   spreadsheets, or                           
                                                                   hard copy.                                 

  2004       FHWA Performance          Unexpended balance for      The unexpended      Decrease the           The unexpended
             Plan/Organizational       projects with no activity   balance for         percentage unexpended  balance for
             Excellence/Improve        for 12 months or more.      projects with no    balance to 1.6 billion projects with no
             ability to manage for                                 activity for 12     (10% reduction).       activity for 12
             results. DOT Strategic                                months or more is                          months or more is
             Plan/Organizational                                   1.73 billion                               \$1.83 billion.
             Excellence/Improved                                   dollars.                                   
             Financial Management                                                                             

  2004       FHWA: President\'s        Customer satisfaction to (% Based on customer   Increase the           85% of customers
             Management Agenda (PMA)   of customers satisfied)     interviews 80% of   percentage of          indicate
             /Improved Financial                                   the customers are   satisfied customers    satisfaction with
             PerformanceE-Government                               satisfied with      (State Partners & FHWA availability and
             DOT Strategic                                         availability and    Division Office users) functionality of
             Plan/Organizational                                   functionality of    to 85%.                FMIS.
             Excellence/Advance the                                FMIS.                                      
             Department\'s ability to                                                                         
             manage for results and                                                                           
             achieve the goals of the                                                                         
             PMA                                                                                              

  2004       Strategic and Performance Set a goal to close grants  FY 2003 Federal     Target 90 per cent.    97% of all grants
             Goals - Organizational    historic grants that have   Transit                                    were awarded
             Excellence FTA Goal 2:    not had a disbursement for  Administration FY                          within 45 days
             Deliver products and      one year and where there    2003 Summary of                            from the date
             services that are valued  are no current Financial    financial and                              submitted.
             by FTA customers. FTA     Status or Quarterly         quarterly Reports,                         
             Goal 4: Position public   Milestone reports.          and helpdesk                               
             transportation as the                                 progress reporting                         
             mode of choice in                                     statistics                                 
             America.                                                                                         

  2004       TEAM supports all of      A yearly increase in        Yearly increase: of Percent increase in    0.7%
             FTA\'s performance        ridership adjusted for      2% in the average   transit ridership      
             goals/measures. The       employment in transit       transit market (150 adjusted for changes   
             outcomes include          systems nationwide          largest transit     in employment levels   
             increased mobility and                                agencies), adjusted                        
             accessibility for all                                 for changes in                             
             Americans, & improvement                              employment levels                          
             of the transportation                                 (new measure in                            
             infrastructure, an                                    2003)                                      
             essential element to                                                                             
             improving mobility and                                                                           
             accessibility.                                                                                   

  2004       FTA Goal 2: Deliver       Improve the quality of      FY 2004 helpdesk    Conduct 100 training   FTA provided 108
             products and services     applications, financial     user training       sessions for new users training sessions
             that are valued by FTA    reporting, and project      evaluations, and    of the TEAM            during fiscal year
             customers.                budgets by providing TEAM   reporting           application during the 2004.
                                       Training to all new users.  statistics that are FY 2004 operational    
                                       Conduct at least 100        compiled monthly.   year.                  
                                       training sessions                                                      

  2004       FTA Strategic Business    Set a 80% on-time goal for  FTA will use the    Target 80%             During the
             Plan- Goal 3: Business    filing financial status     progress reporting                         reporting cycle,
             Processes and Technology  reports, and quarterly      statistics from the                        97% of all
             FTA Goal 3: Establish     milestone progress reports  Help Desk data                             quarterly reports
             effective business        for all new awards.         query programs, and                        were processed
             processes and leverage                                regional activity                          using the web.
             technology.                                           reports from the                           
                                                                   Year End Closing                           
                                                                   for FY 2004.                               

  2004       NHTSA: Organizational     50% Interface with the      GTS supports the    The Interface          Using Grants.gov
             Excellence                Presidential E-Grant        Presidents and      percentage complete of for discretionary
                                       Application system, when it Agency\'s goal of   GTS with the           grants
                                       is ready in FY06. This will providing customers Presidential E-Grant   
                                       further enhance grant       with electronic     Application system     
                                       seekers to go to a single   information and     will be a percent of   
                                       source to gain grant        processes to permit the total integration  
                                       information                 an electronic means milestones completed   
                                                                   for applying for    divided by the total   
                                                                   grants for NHTSA    number of integration  
                                                                   Grants              milestones at the end  
                                                                                       of a measurement year. 

  2004       Organizational Excellence Percentage of required      There were 113      100% of reports are    Goal accomplished.
                                       reports identified in FY03. identified FMIS     complete               
                                                                   reports needed.                            

  2005       FHWA Performance          Unexpended balance for      In FY 04 the        Decrease the           The unexpended
             Plan/Organizational       projects with no activity   unexpended balance  percentage of          balance for
             Excellence/Improve        for 12 months or more.      for projects with   unexpended balance by  projects with no
             ability to manage for                                 no activity for 12  10%.                   activity for 12
             results. DOT Strategic                                months or more was                         months or more is
             Plan/Organizational                                   \$1.83 billion.                            \$2.02 billion
             Excellence/Improved                                                                              (increase related
             Financial Management                                                                             to Emergency
                                                                                                              Relief projects in
                                                                                                              response to
                                                                                                              FY04/05
                                                                                                              hurricanes).

  2005       FTA Strategic Business    Set a goal to close grants  FY 2002 helpdesk    Target 90%             91%
             Plan- Goal 3: Business    within 60 days that are     progress reporting                         
             Processes and Technology  100% disbursed.             statistics                                 

  2005       FTA: Strategic and        Provide timely online help  FY 2003 helpdesk    Target 90 per cent     90%
             Performance Goals -       desk support for increased  statistics                                 
             Organizational Excellence customer satisfaction.                                                 

  2005       NHTSA: Strategic and      Locate and close grants     FY 2003 progress    Target 95%             98%
             Performance Goals -       with no activity within the reporting                                  
             Organizational Excellence past fiscal year            statistics                                 

  2005       NHTSA: Organizational     50% Interface with          GTS supports the    The Interface          This goal cannot
             Excellence                Grants.gov. This will       Presidents and      percentage complete of be met until the
                                       further enhance grant       Agency\'s goal of   GTS with Grants.gov    DOT portal is
                                       seekers to go to a single   providing customers will be a percent of   built to interface
                                       source to gain grant        with electronic     the total integration  with Grants.gov.
                                       information.                information and     milestones completed   It is therefore
                                                                   processes to permit divided by the total   being repeated for
                                                                   an electronic means number of integration  2006.
                                                                   for applying for    milestones at the end  
                                                                   grants for NHTSA    of a measurement year. 
                                                                   Grants                                     

  2005       FHWA: Organizational      Single interface to         No automated        Started with just 10   40 systems
             Excellence: Find the best Grants.gov that             connection to       systems                
             business solutions to     automatically converts      Grants.gov.                                
             accomplish the            applications to appropriate                                            
             Department\'s mission     formats for each existing                                              
             through world-class       grants-management system.                                              
             acquisition and grants                                                                           
             business processes.                                                                              

  2005       FHWA: President\'s        Improve customer            Baseline for FMIS   The percentage of      5% goal met.
             Management Agenda /       satisfaction by 5%          to be determined by satisfied FMIS         
             Improved Financial                                    2004 survey FY 2005 customers (State       
             Performance eGovernment                               Q1                  Partners and FHWA      
             \-- DOT Strategic Plan /                                                  Division Office users) 
             Organizational Excellence                                                                        
             / Advance the                                                                                    
             Department\'s ability to                                                                         
             manage for results and                                                                           
             achieve the goals of the                                                                         
             PMA                                                                                              

  2005       Support FAA\'s 1) Flight  Submit project              Program and track   Take necessary action  Met goals- at
             Plan that specifies       documentation for           all AIP grants      to eliminate grants    least 90%
             annual goals to ensure a  congressional notification  electronically on   that are inactive for  discretionary
             safe & efficient air      to be submitted to OST for  SOAR to ensure that 18 months or more and  funds within 60
             transportation; 2)        90% AIP discretionary funds 100% of all funds   to close out 95% of    days after
             Operational Evolution     within 60 days after such   released by OST by  grants that are 4      available to
             Plan that defines FAA\'s  funds are made available to Aug. 31st are       years and older. In    Regions in SOAR,
             long term commitments for FAA regions in the SOAR     obligated by Sept.  addition, achieve      eliminating grants
             improving capacity and    system.                     30th                annual goals for       inactive 18 mos,
             efficiency in the                                                         runway safety area     closing 95% of
             National Airspace                                                         improvements and noise grants 4 yrs,
                                                                                       enhancement AIP        goals for runway
                                                                                       projects.              safety/noise
                                                                                                              projects. Grants
                                                                                                              released by OST by
                                                                                                              31 Aug oblig by 30
                                                                                                              Sep.

  2005       Support the FAA\'s 1)     Submit project              Program and track   FAA regional           Met goals- at
             Flight Plan that          documentation for           all AIP grants      performance is tracked least 90%
             specifies annual goals to congressional notification  electronically on   monthly using SOAR FAA discretionary
             ensure a safe and         to be submitted to OST for  SOAR to ensure that regions on target to   funds within 60
             efficient air             90% AIP discretionary funds 100% of all funds   meet FY 2005 national  days after
             transportation; and 2)    within 60 days after such   released by OST by  goals, with the        available to
             Operational Evolution     funds are made available to Aug. 31st are       exception of close out Regions in SOAR,
             Plan that defines FAA\'s  FAA regions in the SOAR     obligated by Sept.  of older grants.       eliminating grants
             long term commitments for system. In addition, take   30th.                                      inactive 18 mos,
             improving capacity and    necessary action to                                                    closing 95% of
             efficiency in the         eliminate grants that are                                              grants 4 yrs,
             National Airspace.        inactive for 18 months or                                              goals for runway
                                       more and to close out 95%                                              safety/noise
                                       of grants that are 4 years                                             projects. Grants
                                       and older. Further, achieve                                            released by OST by
                                       annual goals for runway                                                31 Aug oblig by 30
                                       safety area improvements                                               Sep.
                                       and noise enhancement AIP                                              
                                       projects.                                                              

  2006       FTA and Departmental      The FTA has shown           FTA will use the    Using the FY 2005      Will be determined
             Strategic Goals, Core     improvements with awarding  progress reporting  quarterly progress     at the year end
             Accountabilities and      grants within 45 days from  statistics from the reporting-processing   evaluation
             Strategic Business Plan:  submission and closing      Help Desk data      report as an           
             Goal 2 Products and       grants that are 100%        query programs, and evaluation tool FTA    
             Services, Key Strategy    disbursed or over 5 years   regional activity   will compute the       
             includes Goal 3 Business  old using reengineered work reports from the    targeted goals.        
             Processes and Technology. flow processes in the       Year End Closing                           
             The Key Strategies        TEAM-Web system.            for FY 20043                               
             include:                                                                                         
             Identify/incorporate best                                                                        
             practi                                                                                           

  2006       FTA Strategic Business    Using the annual TEAM       FY 2005 Federal     Target 95%             To be determined
             Plan- Goal 3: Business    closing report close 95% of Transit                                    at the end of the
             Processes and Technology  all identified grants       Administration FY                          fiscal quarter
             FTA Goal 3: Establish     within the first quarter.   2005 Grant                                 
             effective business                                    processing Report                          
             processes and leverage                                and helpdesk                               
             technology.                                           progress reporting                         
                                                                   statistics                                 

  2006       Support the FAA\'s 1)     Achieve annual goals for    Program and track   FAA regional           Will be determined
             Flight Plan that          funding runway safety area  all AIP grants      performance is tracked at the year-end
             specifies annual goals to improvements, runway        electroncically on  monthly using SOAR.    evaluation.
             ensure a safe and         pavement condition and      SOAR to ensure that                        
             efficient air             noise enhancement AIP       100% of all funds                          
             transportation; 2)        projects. In addition,      released by OST by                         
             Operational Evolution     ensure monthly              31 Aug are                                 
             Plan that defines FAA\'s  reconciliation with DELPHI  obligated by 30                            
             long term commitments for and support the agency\'s   Sept. Submit                               
             improving capacity and    schedule for year-end       project                                    
             efficiency in the         reconciliation/close-out.   documentation for                          
             National Airspace.                                    Congressional                              
                                                                   notification to OST                        
                                                                   for 90% AIP                                
                                                                   discretionary                              
                                                                   grants.                                    

  2006       FHWA: DOT Strateigc       Customer satisfaction (% of Based on customer   Increase the           Actual results
             Plan/Organizational       customers satisfied)        interviews 85% of   percentage of          will be available
             Excellence/Advance the                                the customers are   satisfied customers    in Annual Report
             Department\'s ability to                              satisfied with      (State Partners & FHWA by FY 2007 Q1.
             manage for resuilts and                               availability and    Division Office users) 
             achieve the goals fo the                              functionality of    to 87.5%               
             PMA.                                                  FMIS.                                      

  2006       FHWA: DOT Strategic       Unexpended balance for      In FY05 the         Decrease the           2007 Q1.
             Plan/Organizational       projects with no activity   unexpended balance  percentage of          
             Excellence/Improved       for 12 months or more.      for projects with   unexpended balance by  
             Financial Management                                  no activity for 12  10%.                   
                                                                   months or more was                         
                                                                   2.02 billion.                              

  2006       FTA Strategic Business    Monitor average grant       9/2005: 28 days     36 days overall        2006 Q3: 26 days
             Plan - Goal 3: Business   processing time across                          average                
             Processes and Technology; programs.                                                              
             Establish effective                                                                              
             business processes and                                                                           
             leverage technology.                                                                             

  2007       Support the FAA\'s 1)     Issue 90% of all            Program and track   FAA regional           Will be determined
             Flight Plan that          construction and equipment  all AIP grants      performance is tracked at the year-end
             specifies annual goals to AIP grants based on bids.   electronically on   monthly using SOAR.    evaluation.
             ensure a safe and         Also, achieve annual goals  SOAR to ensure that                        
             efficient air             for funding runway safety   100% of all funds                          
             transportation; and 2)    area improvements, runway   released by OST by                         
             Operational Evolution     pavement condition and      31 Aug are                                 
             Plan that defines FAA\'s  noise enhancement AIP       obligated by 30                            
             long term commitments for projects.                   Sept. Submit                               
             improving                                             project                                    
             capacityefficiency in the                             documentation for                          
             National Airspace.                                    Congressional                              
                                                                   notification to to                         
                                                                   OST for 90% AIP                            
                                                                   discretionary                              
                                                                   grants.                                    

  2007       FHWA: DOT Strategic       Unexpended balance for      In FY 06 the        Decrease the           Actual results
             Plan/Organizational       projects with no activity   unexpended balance  percentage of          will be available
             Excellence/Improved       for 12 months or more.      for projects with   unexpended balance by  in FY07 Annual
             Financial Management                                  no activity for 12  10%.                   Report by FY 2008
                                                                   onths or more - TBD                        Q1.
                                                                   in FY07 Q1.                                

  2007       FTA: Prepare for IT       Monitor network and TEAM    New measure         95% up time            TBD at end of year
             Consolidation/Move to new availability during DOT                                                
             DOT building              consolidation.                                                         

  2007       FTA and Departmental      Monitor closure of fully    9/2005: 98%         95% of fully disbursed TBD at end of year
             Strategic Goals, Core     disbursed grants.                               grants included in the 
             Accountabilities and                                                      measure list.          
             Strategic Business Plan:                                                                         
             Goal 2 - Products and                                                                            
             Services, Key Strategy                                                                           
             includes Goal 3 Business                                                                         
             Processes and Technology.                                                                        

  2007       FTA Strategic Business    Monitor closure of old and  9/2005:77%          Target 90%              
             Plan - Goal 3: Business   inactive grants.\                                                      
             Processes and Technology, \                                                                      
             FTA Goal 3: Establish     FTA will assemble a list of                                            
             effective business        grants that were obligated                                             
             processes and leverage    over 5 years ago, and                                                  
             technology.               haven\'t had a disbursement                                            
                                       in 18 months at BOY, and                                               
                                       distribute to the regions                                              
                                       for review.                                                            

  2007       FTA Strategic Business    Monitor average grant       9/2005: 28 days     36 days overall        TBD at end of year
             Plan, Goal 3: Business    processing time across                          average                
             Processes and Technology, programs                                                               
             FTA Goal 3: Establish                                                                            
             effective business                                                                               
             processes and leverage                                                                           
             technology.                                                                                      

  2008       FHWA: DOT Strategic       The number of reports       The number of FMIS  Increase the number of Actual results
             Plan/Organizational       available in spreadsheet    reports importable  reports available for  will be available
             Excellence/Improved       format to FMIS users.       to spreadsheet      spreadsheet conversion in FY08 Annual
             Financial Management                                  formats for         format from 10% to 35% Report by FY 2009
                                                                   financial           of current number of   Q1.
                                                                   applications        reports.               
                                                                   locally is 12.                             

  2008       FHWA: Organizational      Increase the number of      Number of States    To increase the number Actual results
             Excellence                States that have compatible submitting data     of States using        will be available
                                       systems submitting project  through the FMIS    electronic project     in FY08 Annual
                                       agreement data              system is 40.       agreement submission   Report by FY 2009
                                       electroncially through FMIS                     15% by the end of FY   Q1.
                                       system.                                         2008.                  

  2008       Organizational Excellence NHTSA: 100% interface with  GTS supports the    The interface          Percentage of
                                       the GMLoB consolidated      PMA goal of         percentage complete of system integration
                                       eGrant system when it is    providing customers GTS with the GMLoB     complete.
                                       ready in FY08. This will    with electronic     consolidated eGrant    
                                       further enhance grant       information and     system is a percent of 
                                       applicants to go to a       proceses to permit  the total integration  
                                       single source for grant     an electronic means milestones completed.  
                                       information.                for applying for                           
                                                                   NHTSA grants.                              

  2008       Organizational Excellence NHTSA: 100% interface with  GTS supports the    The percentage of      Percentage
                                       the DOT Grant Noticiation   PMA goal of         interface completion   available during
                                       System when it is ready in  providing           between GTS and GNS.   Q1, 2009.
                                       FY08. This will enhance and electonric                                 
                                       support the GMLoB and DOT   information and                            
                                       directive of consolidating  processes for grant                        
                                       grant systems.              applications.                              

  2008       FTA and DOT Strategic     Monitor closure of fully    9/2005:77%          Target 90%             TBD at end of year
             Goals, Core               disbursed grants.\                                                     
             Accountabilities and      \                                                                      
             Strategic Business Plan:  FTA will assemble a list of                                            
             Goal 2: Products and      grants that are fully                                                  
             Services, key Strategy    disbursed at BOY and                                                   
             includes Goal 3 Business  distribute to the regions                                              
             Processes and Technology  for review.                                                            

  2008       FTA Strategic Business    Monitor closure of old and  9/2005:77%          Target 90%             TBD at year end
             Plan - Goal 3: Business   inactive grants.\                                                      
             Processes and Technology, \                                                                      
             FTA Goals 3: Establish    Produce a list of grants                                               
             effective business        obligated over 5 years ago                                             
             processes and leverage    that haven\'t had                                                      
             technology.               disbursements in 18 months                                             
                                       at BOY and distribute to                                               
                                       regions for review.                                                    

  2008       FTA Strategic Business    Monitor average grant       9/2005: 28 days     36 days overall        TBD at year end
             Plan - Goal 3: Business   processing time across                          average                
             Processes and Technology, programs.                                                              
             FTA Goal 3: Establish                                                                            
             effective business                                                                               
             processes and leverage                                                                           
             technology.                                                                                      

  2008       Organization Excellence   Develop a plan to share     10 DOT grant        Reduce number and size TBD
                                       and/or consolidate grant    systems             of DOT grant systems   
                                       system components reducing                                             
                                       maintenance costs by 15%                                               
                                       annually.                                                              
  ---------- ------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------- ------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
                                                                        

  **All new IT investments initiated for FY 2005 and beyond must use    
  Table 2 and are required to use the Federal Enterprise Architecture   
  (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Please use Table 2 and the   
  PRM to identify the performance information pertaining to this major  
  IT investment. Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding    
  \"Measurement Area\" and \"Measurement Grouping\" identified in the   
  PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for at least  
  four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is   
  available at www.egov.gov.**                                          

  **Performance Information Table 2:**                                  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------- --------------------------- -----------------
  **Fiscal   **Measurement   **Measurement    **Measurement    **Measurement      **Baseline**    **Planned Improvement to    **Actual
  Year**     Area**          Category**       Grouping**       Indicator**                        the Baseline**              Results**

  2004       Technology      Efficiency       Improvement      How many State     9 State DOTs    Increase number of          10 States
                                                               DOTs exchange data exchange data   electronic data sharing     exchanging
                                                               with FMIS via      with FMIS via   States to 10                electronic data
                                                               automated          automated                                   with FMIS; goal
                                                               electronic data    electronic data                             met.
                                                               sharing            sharing                                     

  2005       Customer        Service Coverage Service          How many customers 41 of 53 States Increase the number of      Actual number of
             Results                          Efficiency       directly access    and territories States and territories that States using
                                                               FMIS, and how many directly access directly access FMIS from   direct access to
                                                               are fully          FMIS. Of the    41 to 42 (2% increase)      FMIS will be
                                                               automated          41, nine are                                available in FY
                                                                                  fully automated                             2006 Q1
                                                                                  for electronic                              
                                                                                  data sharing                                

  2005       Mission and     Workforce        Training and     How many users and 4-6% of users   Train 4% of users and       Actual number of
             Business        Management       Employment       employees receive  and employees   employees on FMIS           users and
             Results                                           training           require                                     employees trained
                                                                                  training due to                             will be available
                                                                                  turnover and                                in FY 2006 Q1
                                                                                  FMIS                                        
                                                                                  enhancements                                

  2005       Processes and   Management and   Compliance       Section 508        FMIS is not     FMIS will be 100% Section   10% complete due
             Activities      Innovation                        compliance for     Section 508     508 compliant by December   to resource
                                                               FMIS               compliant       31, 2005                    limitations

  2005       Processes and   Management and   Compliance       Number of projects 4% of FHWA      Reduce the percentage of    Actual results
             Activities      Innovation                        that have correct  projects have   incorrect project balances  available by FY
                                                               project balances   incorrect       by 90%                      2006 Q1
                                                                                  balances in                                 
                                                                                  DOT\'s DELPHI                               
                                                                                  accounting                                  
                                                                                  system                                      

  2005       Processes and   Productivity and Productivity     How quickly        FMIS contract   Continue to post contract   Actual results
             Activities      Efficiency                        contract authority authority and   authority and obligation    available in FY
                                                               and fund           fund            data within two days of     2006 Q1
                                                               obligations are    obligations are receipt to improve          
                                                               posted after       posted within   stewardship and             
                                                               receipt            two days of     accountability for          
                                                                                  receipt         expenditures and to         
                                                                                                  implement SAFETEA           
                                                                                                  requirements                

  2006       Customer        Service Coverage Service          GTS: 175           GTS currently   This measurement is the %   Percentage
             Results                          Efficiency                          only tracks     of GTS processes integrated available 1st
                                                                                  NHTSA grant     with Grants.gov by FY06 -   quarter FY07.
                                                                                  funding         permitting customers to go  
                                                                                  information.    to a single source to apply 
                                                                                                  and track all Federal grant 
                                                                                                  requests, thereby           
                                                                                                  eliminating the need to go  
                                                                                                  through the same process    
                                                                                                  with multip                 

  2006       Mission and     Transportation   Ground           GTS: Ground        GTS tracks      This will be the            The results of
             Business                         Transportation   Transportation     State NHTSA     measurement of the number   this measurement
             Results                                                              grant funds.    of users with the           will be a
                                                                                  However, the    capability to submit all    percentage of the
                                                                                  users do not    grant plans, applications,  total number of
                                                                                  track           evaluations, etc.           users that use
                                                                                  applications    electronically through GTS  all functions of
                                                                                  and             by FY06                     the system.
                                                                                  evaluations.                                

  2006       Processes and   Management and   Compliance       TEAM: Implement    Currently using Efficiency of operations    100% implemented
             Activities      Innovation                        new legislation in old legislation for budget execution        in 1st Qtr FY06
                                                               SAFETEA-LU.                                                    

  2006       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Number of programs All             10% increase in number of   Available 1st Qtr
             Activities      Efficiency                        that adapt to      discretionary   programs per year, based on FY07
                                                               Grants.gov FIND    programs plan   available data sets         
                                                                                  to use                                      
                                                                                  Grants.gov in                               
                                                                                  FY 2006.                                    

  2006       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       Number of programs 75% of          10% increase in number of   As of August
             Activities      Efficiency                        that adapt to      discretionary   programs per year, based on 2006, the
                                                               Grants.gov APPLY   grant programs  available data sets         percentage is
                                                                                  plan to use                                 92%.
                                                                                  Grants.gov in                               
                                                                                  FY 2006.                                    

  2006       Processes and   Productivity and Efficiency       GTS: 194           55% of system   100% of system interfaces   Waiting for GMLoB
             Activities      Efficiency                                           interfaces with with Grants.gov system      solution decision
                                                                                  Grants.gov                                  
                                                                                  system                                      

  2006       Technology      Effectiveness    IT Contribution  GTS: User          Grant           Complete upgrades to system It is expected
                                              to Process,      requirements       submission is   so that grants can be       that by FY06, GTS
                                              Customer, or                        not a fully     completely submitted        will have the
                                              Mission                             electronic      electronically              capability to
                                                                                  process.                                    submit and
                                                                                                                              process all
                                                                                                                              grants
                                                                                                                              electronically.
                                                                                                                              The actual
                                                                                                                              measure of which
                                                                                                                              will be the
                                                                                                                              percentage of the
                                                                                                                              system that is
                                                                                                                              not yet
                                                                                                                              electronic.

  2006       Technology      Efficiency       Accessibility    TEAM: Automate a   manual          Incrementally process based 100% electronic
                                                               consolidated grant                 on value of grant           data transfer 2nd
                                                               release process                    processing                  Qtr FY06
                                                               that interfaces                                                
                                                               with the OST                                                   
                                                               Grants                                                         
                                                               Notification                                                   
                                                               System.                                                        

  2006       Technology      Efficiency       Accessibility    TEAM:              manual          Electronically receive all  100% in 2nd Qtr
                                                               System-to-system                   Grants.gov applications and FY06
                                                               interface with                     load into TEAM.             
                                                               Grants.gov                                                     

  2007       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer         FTA: Monitor       9/2005: 28 days 36 days overall average     TBD
             Results                          Satisfaction     average grant                                                  
                                                               processing time                                                
                                                               across programs                                                

  2007       Processes and   Financial        Financial        FMIS: Percentage   In FY06 the     Improve by 5%               TBD
             Activities      (Processes and   Management       reduction of       unexpended                                  
                             Activities)                       unexpended balance balance for                                 
                                                                                  projects with                               
                                                                                  no activity for                             
                                                                                  12 months or                                
                                                                                  more was                                    

  2007       Processes and   Management and   Compliance       TEAM:              Operations      Migrate hardware and        2nd Qtr FY07
             Activities      Innovation                        Consolidation of   running         software technology to new  
                                                               TEAM operations in independently   DOT facility.               
                                                               new DOT            at current                                  
                                                               headquarters       site.                                       
                                                               building.                                                      

  2007       Processes and   Management and   Compliance       TEAM: Monitor      9/2005: 98%     95% of fu lly disbursed     TBD
             Activities      Innovation                        closure of fully                   grants included in the      
                                                               disbursed grants                   measure list                

  2007       Processes and   Management and   Compliance       FTA: Monitor       9/2005: 77%     Target 90%                  TBD
             Activities      Innovation                        closure of old and                                             
                                                               inactive grants.                                               

  2007       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     Expand COOP        2 to 4 days to  1 day to stand up COOP site TBD: 2007
                             Availability                      capability         switch to COOP                              
                                                                                  site                                        

  2007       Technology      Reliability and  Availability     TEAM up and        New measure     Customer access to system   TBD
                             Availability                      running 95% of the                 should be 95% of the time   
                                                               time                                                           

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer         FTA: Monitor       9/2005: 77%     Target 90%                  TBD
             Results                          Complaints       closure of fully                                               
                                                               disbursed grants                                               

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer         FMIS: Increase the 10% of reports  35% of reports should be    TBD
             Results                          Satisfaction     number of reports  now available   available in spreadsheet    
                                                               available in       in spreadsheet  format                      
                                                               spreadsheet format format                                      
                                                               to FMIS users.                                                 

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer         FHWA: Increase     Present number  Increase number of states   TBD
             Results                          Satisfaction     number of states   is 20 states    by 15%                      
                                                               with systems                                                   
                                                               compatible to FMIS                                             
                                                               who can submit                                                 
                                                               data                                                           
                                                               electronically                                                 

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer         FTA: Monitor       9/2005: 28 days 36 days overall average     TBD
             Results                          Satisfaction     average grant                                                  
                                                               processing time                                                
                                                               across programs                                                

  2008       Customer        Customer Benefit Customer         Increase number of Mostly existing Require training for new    TBD in 2008
             Results                          Training         customers trained  employees have  FTA employees               
                                                               in TEAM.           TEAM training                               

  2008       Mission and     Financial        Reporting and    FTA: Monitor       9/2005: 77%     Target 90%                  TBD
             Business        Management       Information      closure of old and                                             
             Results                                           inactive grants                                                

  2008       Mission and     Information and  Information      NHTSA: 100%        No interface at 100% successful interface   TBD
             Business        Technology       Management       interface with the present                                     
             Results         Management                        Grants                                                         
                                                               Notification                                                   
                                                               System to Congress                                             

  2008       Mission and     Information and  System           NHTSA: 100%        GTS is now a    Percentage of               TBD
             Business        Technology       Development      interface of use   standalone      integration/consolidation   
             Results         Management                        of GMLoB           NHTSA grants    with GMLoB solution         
                                                               consolidated       system                                      
                                                               eGrants system                                                 
  ---------- --------------- ---------------- ---------------- ------------------ --------------- --------------------------- -----------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
  **I.E. Security and Privacy**                                   

                                                                  

  **In order to successfully address this area of the business    
  case, each question below must be answered at the               
  system/application level, not at a program or agency level.     
  Systems supporting this investment on the planning and          
  operational systems security tables should match the systems on 
  the privacy table below. Systems on the Operational Security    
  Table must be included on your agency FISMA system inventory    
  and should be easily referenced in the inventory (i.e., should  
  use the same name or identifier).**                             

  **All systems supporting and/or part of this investment should  
  be included in the tables below, inclusive of both agency owned 
  systems and contractor systems. For IT investments under        
  development, security and privacy planning must proceed in      
  parallel with the development of the system/s to ensure IT      
  security and privacy requirements and costs are identified and  
  incorporated into the overall lifecycle of the system/s.**      

  **Please respond to the questions below and verify the system   
  owner took the following actions:**                             

  **1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been          Yes
  identified and integrated into the overall costs of the         
  investment:**                                                   

  **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the \"Percentage IT Security\" for  4.731000
  the budget year:**                                              

  **2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a  Yes
  part of the overall risk management effort for each system      
  supporting or part of this investment.**                        

                                                                  

  **3. Systems in Planning - Security Table:**                    
  --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

  ---------- ----------------------- --------------- ----------------------
  **Name of  **Agency/ or Contractor **Planned       **Planned or Actual
  System**   Operated System?**      Operational     C&A Completion Date**
                                     Date**          

  ---------- ----------------------- --------------- ----------------------

  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --
                                                                        

  **4. Operational Systems - Security Table:**                          
  --------------------------------------------------------------------- --

  ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -------------- -------------
  **Name of  **Agency/ or **NIST     **Has C&A    **Date C&A   **What      **Date         **Date the
  System**   Contractor   FIPS 199   been         Complete**   standards   Complete(d):   contingency
             Operated     Risk       Completed,                were used   Security       plan tested**
             System?**    Impact     using NIST                for the     Control        
                          level**    800-37?**                 Security    Testing**      
                                                               Controls                   
                                                               tests?**                   

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted

  redacted   redacted     redacted   redacted     redacted     redacted    redacted       redacted
  ---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -------------- -------------

  -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
                                                                       

  **5. Have any weaknesses related to any of the systems part of or    No
  supporting this investment been identified by the agency or IG?**    

  **   a. If \"yes,\" have those weaknesses been incorporated          
  agency\'s plan of action and milestone process?**                    

  **6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is          No
  requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?**                     

  **   a. If \"yes,\" specify the amount, provide a general            
  description of the weakness, and explain how the funding request     
  will remediate the weakness.**                                       

                                                                       

  **7. How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified,     
  validated by the agency for the contractor systems above?**          

  Redacted                                                             

                                                                       

  **8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:**               
  -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----

  ---------- ----------- ------------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
  **Name of  **Is this a **Is there a       **Is the PIA  **Is a       **Was a new
  System**   new         Privacy Impact     available to  System of    or amended
             system?**   Assessment (PIA)   the public?** Records      SORN
                         that covers this                 Notice       published in
                         system?**                        (SORN)       FY 06?**
                                                          required for 
                                                          this         
                                                          system?**    

  FedStar    No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  

  FMIS       No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  

  GIS        No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  

  GNS        No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  

  GTS        No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  

  SOAR       No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  

  TEAM       No          No, because the    No, because a No           No, because
                         system does not    PIA is not                 the system is
                         contain, process,  yet required               not a Privacy
                         or transmit        to be                      Act system of
                         personal           completed at               records.
                         identifying        this time.                 
                         information.                                  
  ---------- ----------- ------------------ ------------- ------------ -------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **I.F. Enterprise Architecture (EA)**                       |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
|                                                             |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **In order to successfully address this area of the         |        |
| business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the    |        |
| investment is included in the agency\'s EA and Capital      |        |
| Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is      |        |
| mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the    |        |
| business case demonstrates the relationship between the     |        |
| investment and the business, performance, data, services,   |        |
| application, and technology layers of the agency\'s EA.**   |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **1. Is this investment included in your agency\'s target   | Yes    |
| enterprise architecture?**                                  |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **   a. If \"no,\" please explain why?**                    |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
|                                                             |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **2. Is this investment included in the agency\'s EA        | Yes    |
| Transition Strategy?**                                      |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the investment name as          | DOT    |
| identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the       | consol |
| agency\'s most recent annual EA Assessment.**               | idated |
|                                                             | e      |
|                                                             | Grants |
|                                                             | and    |
|                                                             | Grants |
|                                                             | Mana   |
|                                                             | gement |
|                                                             | Line   |
|                                                             | of     |
|                                                             | Bu     |
|                                                             | siness |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **   b. If \"no,\" please explain why?**                    |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
|                                                             |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
|                                                             |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+
| **3. Service Reference Model (SRM) Table:**                 |        |
|                                                             |        |
| **Identify the service components funded by this major IT   |        |
| investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, |        |
| customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this       |        |
| information in the format of the following table. For       |        |
| detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to     |        |
| http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.**                      |        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+--------+

  ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------
  **Agency    **Agency        **Service    **FEA SRM        **FEA SRM        **FEA       **FEA       **Internal   **BY Funding
  Component   Component       Domain**     Service Type**   Component**      Service     Service     or External  Percentage**
  Name**      Description**                                                  Component   Component   Reuse?**     
                                                                             Reused      Reused                   
                                                                             Name**      UPI**                    

                              Back Office  Asset /          Computers /                              Internal     5
                              Services     Materials        Automation                                            
                                           Management       Management                                            

                              Back Office  Data Management  Data Exchange                            No Reuse     5
                              Services                                                                            

                              Back Office  Data Management  Meta Data                                Internal     5
                              Services                      Management                                            

                              Back Office  Development and  Data Integration                         No Reuse     10
                              Services     Integration                                                            

                              Back Office  Development and  Enterprise                               No Reuse     10
                              Services     Integration      Application                                           
                                                            Integration                                           

                              Back Office  Development and  Software                                 Internal     20
                              Services     Integration      Development                                           

                              Back Office  Financial        Auditing                                 No Reuse     5
                              Services     Management                                                             

                              Business     Management of    Configuration                            Internal     5
                              Management   Processes        Management                                            
                              Services                                                                            

                              Business     Organizational   Network                                  Internal     5
                              Management   Management       Management                                            
                              Services                                                                            

                              Digital      Content          Content                                  No Reuse     5
                              Asset        Management       Publishing and                                        
                              Services                      Delivery                                              

                              Digital      Document         Library /                                Internal     5
                              Asset        Management       Storage                                               
                              Services                                                                            

                              Digital      Knowledge        Information                              No Reuse     5
                              Asset        Management       Sharing                                               
                              Services                                                                            

                              Support      Security         Access Control                           No Reuse     5
                              Services     Management                                                             

                              Support      Security         Identification                           No Reuse     5
                              Services     Management       and                                                   
                                                            Authentication                                        

                              Support      Systems          System Resource                          Internal     5
                              Services     Management       Monitoring                                            
  ----------- --------------- ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------

+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
|                                                                     |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **Use existing SRM Components or identify as \"NEW\". A \"NEW\"     |   |
| component is one not already identified as a service component in   |   |
| the FEA SRM.**                                                      |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but |   |
| being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no,        |   |
| identify the reused service component funded by the other           |   |
| investment and identify the other investment using the Unique       |   |
| Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53          |   |
| submission.**                                                       |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **\'Internal\' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency   |   |
| within a department is reusing a service component provided by      |   |
| another agency within the same department. \'External\' reuse is    |   |
| one agency within a department reusing a service component provided |   |
| by another agency in another department. A good example of this is  |   |
| an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations  |   |
| across the federal government.**                                    |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount  |   |
| used for each service component listed in the table. If external,   |   |
| provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for  |   |
| the service.**                                                      |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
|                                                                     |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+
| **4. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:**                       |   |
|                                                                     |   |
| **To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA   |   |
| Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas,     |   |
| Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this   |   |
| IT investment.**                                                    |   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+---+

  ---------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------- --------------------
  **FEA SRM        **FEA TRM        **FEA TRM Service  **FEA TRM        **Service
  Component**      Service Area**   Category**         Service          Specification (i.e.
                                                       Standard**       vendor or product
                                                                        name)**

  Software         Component        Business Logic     Platform         Enterprise Java
  Development      Framework                           Independent      Beans (EJB)

  Data Exchange    Component        Data Interchange   Data Exchange    Electronic Business
                   Framework                                            using XML (ebXML)

  Data Exchange    Component        Data Interchange   Data Exchange    Simple Object Access
                   Framework                                            Protocol (SOAP)

  Data Integration Component        Data Management    Database         Java Database
                   Framework                           Connectivity     Connectivity (JDBC)

  Data Integration Component        Data Management    Database         Open Database
                   Framework                           Connectivity     Connectivity (ODBC)

  Auditing         Component        Data Management    Reporting and    Online Analytical
                   Framework                           Analysis         Processing (OLAP)

  Content          Component        Presentation /     Content          Dynamic HTML (DHTML)
  Publishing and   Framework        Interface          Rendering        
  Delivery                                                              

  Content          Component        Presentation /     Dynamic          Java Server Pages
  Publishing and   Framework        Interface          Server-Side      (JSP)
  Delivery                                             Display          

  Content          Component        Presentation /     Static Display   Hyper Text Markup
  Publishing and   Framework        Interface                           Language (HTML)
  Delivery                                                              

  Access Control   Component        Security           Certificates /   Digital Certificate
                   Framework                           Digital          Authentication
                                                       Signatures       

  Access Control   Component        Security           Supporting       Security Assertion
                   Framework                           Security         Markup Language
                                                       Services         (SAML)

  Access Control   Service Access   Access Channels    Collaboration /  Electronic Mail
                   and Delivery                        Communications   (E-mail)

  Access Control   Service Access   Access Channels    Other Electronic Web Service
                   and Delivery                        Channels         

  Access Control   Service Access   Access Channels    Web Browser      Internet Explorer
                   and Delivery                                         

  Access Control   Service Access   Access Channels    Web Browser      Netscape
                   and Delivery                                         Communicator

  Information      Service Access   Delivery Channels  Peer to Peer     CCR/BPN and
  Sharing          and Delivery                        (P2P)            E-Authentication

  Identification   Service Access   Service            Authentication / eAuthentication
  and              and Delivery     Requirements       Single Sign-on   
  Authentication                                                        

  Enterprise       Service Access   Service            Hosting          External
  Application      and Delivery     Requirements                        (ISP/ASP/FirstGov)
  Integration                                                           

  System Resource  Service Access   Service            Legislative /    Section 508
  Monitoring       and Delivery     Requirements       Compliance       

  Identification   Service Access   Service            Legislative /    Security
  and              and Delivery     Requirements       Compliance       
  Authentication                                                        

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Service          File Transfer
  Management       and Delivery                        Transport        Protocol (FTP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Service          Hyper Text Transfer
  Management       and Delivery                        Transport        Protocol (HTTP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Service          Hyper Text Transfer
  Management       and Delivery                        Transport        Protocol Secure
                                                                        (HTTPS)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Service          Internet Protocol
  Management       and Delivery                        Transport        (IP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Service          Transport Control
  Management       and Delivery                        Transport        Protocol (TCP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Supporting       Dynamic Host
  Management       and Delivery                        Network Services Configuration
                                                                        Protocol (DHCP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Supporting       Internet Message
  Management       and Delivery                        Network Services Access Protocol /
                                                                        Post Office Protocol
                                                                        (IMAP / POP3)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Supporting       Lightweight
  Management       and Delivery                        Network Services Directory Access
                                                                        Protocol (LDAP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Supporting       Multipurpose
  Management       and Delivery                        Network Services Internet Mail
                                                                        Extensions (MIME)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Supporting       Simple Mail Transfer
  Management       and Delivery                        Network Services Protocol (SMTP)

  Network          Service Access   Service Transport  Supporting       Simple Network
  Management       and Delivery                        Network Services Management Protocol
                                                                        (SNMP)

  Meta Data        Service          Integration        Middleware       Database Access:
  Management       Interface and                                        PL/SQL
                   Integration                                          

  Information      Service          Interface          Service          Application Program
  Sharing          Interface and                       Description /    Interface (API) /
                   Integration                         Interface        Protocol

  Information      Service          Interface          Service          Web Services
  Sharing          Interface and                       Description /    Description Language
                   Integration                         Interface        (WSDL)

  Information      Service          Interface          Service          Universal
  Sharing          Interface and                       Discovery        Description
                   Integration                                          Discovery and
                                                                        Integration (UDDI)

  Information      Service          Interoperability   Data Format /    eXtensible Markup
  Sharing          Interface and                       Classification   Language (XML)
                   Integration                                          

  Content          Service          Interoperability   Data             eXtensible
  Publishing and   Interface and                       Transformation   Stylesheet Language
  Delivery         Integration                                          Transform (XSLT)

  Information      Service          Interoperability   Data Types /     Document Type
  Sharing          Interface and                       Validation       Definition (DTD)
                   Integration                                          

  Information      Service          Interoperability   Data Types /     XML Schema
  Sharing          Interface and                       Validation       
                   Integration                                          

  Library /        Service Platform Database / Storage Database         Oracle, Ingres, MS
  Storage          and                                                  SQL Server
                   Infrastructure                                       

  Enterprise       Service Platform Delivery Servers   Application      InflowSuite,
  Application      and                                 Servers          PureEdge
  Integration      Infrastructure                                       

  Software         Service Platform Delivery Servers   Web Servers      Widely used public
  Development      and                                                  domain
                   Infrastructure                                       

  Computers /      Service Platform Hardware /         Servers /        Enterprise Server
  Automation       and              Infrastructure     Computers        
  Management       Infrastructure                                       

  Configuration    Service Platform Software           Software         PVCS Tracker and
  Management       and              Engineering        Configuration    Rational Rose
                   Infrastructure                      Management       

  Software         Service Platform Support Platforms  Platform         Java 2 Platform
  Development      and                                 Independent      Enterprise Edition
                   Infrastructure                                       (J2EE)
  ---------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------- --------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **Service Components identified in  
  the previous question should be     
  entered in this column. Please      
  enter multiple rows for FEA SRM     
  Components supported by multiple    
  TRM Service Specifications**        

  **In the Service Specification      
  field, Agencies should provide      
  information on the specified        
  technical standard or vendor        
  product mapped to the FEA TRM       
  Service Standard, including model   
  or version numbers, as              
  appropriate.**                      

                                      

  **5. Will the application leverage  Yes
  existing components and/or          
  applications across the Government  
  (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?**   

  **   a. If \"yes,\" please          
  describe.**                         

  The DOT/HUD consolidated eGrants    
  solution will leverage Federal      
  projects like E-Authentication and  
  Grants.gov. It will also leverage   
  the DOT Financial Center of         
  Excellence - Delphi for grant       
  payment. Established COTS tools     
  will be used such as business       
  intelligence for reporting and      
  business process management to      
  efficiently automate and integrate  
  workflow with business rules.       
  Maintenance costs will be minimized 
  by reusing software components and  
  COTS software products.             

  **6. Does this investment provide   Yes
  the public with access to a         
  government automated information    
  system?**                           

  **   a. If \"yes,\" does customer   No
  access require specific software    
  (e.g., a specific web browser       
  version)?**                         

  **      1. If \"yes,\" provide the   
  specific product name(s) and        
  version number(s) of the required   
  software and the date when the      
  public will be able to access this  
  investment by any software (i.e. to 
  ensure equitable and timely access  
  of government information and       
  services).**                        

                                      
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  **Exhibit 300: Part II: Planning, Acquisition and Performance
  Information**

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **II.A. Alternatives Analysis**                              |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
|                                                              |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **Part II should be completed only for investments           |       |
| identified as \"Planning\" or \"Full Acquisition,\" or       |       |
| \"Mixed Life-Cycle\" investments in response to Question 6   |       |
| in Part I, Section A above.**                                |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **In selecting the best capital asset, you should identify   |       |
| and consider at least three viable alternatives, in addition |       |
| to the current baseline, i.e., the status quo. Use OMB       |       |
| Circular A- 94 for all investments, and the Clinger Cohen    |       |
| Act of 1996 for IT investments, to determine the criteria    |       |
| you should use in your Benefit/Cost Analysis.**              |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this       | No    |
| project?**                                                   |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **   a. If \"yes,\" provide the date the analysis was        |       |
| completed?**                                                 |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **   b. If \"no,\" what is the anticipated date this         | 12/15 |
| analysis will be completed?**                                | /2006 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **   c. If no analysis is planned, please briefly explain    |       |
| why:**                                                       |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
|                                                              |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
|                                                              |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+
| **2. Alternative Analysis Results:**                         |       |
|                                                              |       |
| **Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete  |       |
| the following table:**                                       |       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------+

  -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------------- ---------------------
  **redacted**   **Redacted**   **Description   **Risk Adjusted      **Risk Adjusted
                                of              Lifecycle Costs      Lifecycle Benefits
                                Alternative**   estimate**           estimate**

  Redacted       Redacted       Redacted        Redacted             Redacted

  Redacted       Redacted       Redacted        Redacted             Redacted

  Redacted       Redacted       Redacted        Redacted             Redacted

  Redacted       Redacted       Redacted        Redacted             Redacted
  -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------------- ---------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  **3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency\'s
  Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen?**

  Redacted

  **4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?**

  Redacted
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
  **II.B. Risk Management**           

                                      

  **You should have performed a risk  
  assessment during the early         
  planning and initial concept phase  
  of this investment\'s life-cycle,   
  developed a risk-adjusted           
  life-cycle cost estimate and a plan 
  to eliminate, mitigate or manage    
  risk, and be actively managing risk 
  throughout the investment\'s        
  life-cycle.**                       

  **1. Does the investment have a     No
  Risk Management Plan?**             

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the      
  date of the plan?**                 

  **   b. Has the Risk Management     No
  Plan been significantly changed     
  since last year\'s submission to    
  OMB?**                              

  **c. If \"yes,\" describe any       
  significant changes:**              

                                      

  **2. If there currently is no plan, Yes
  will a plan be developed?**         

  **   a. If \"yes,\" what is the     11/20/2006
  planned completion date?**          

  **   b. If \"no,\" what is the      
  strategy for managing the risks?**  

                                      

  **3. Briefly describe how           
  investment risks are reflected in   
  the life cycle cost estimate and    
  investment schedule:**              

  A detailed Project Plan which will  
  include a Risk Management Plan will 
  be developed. Costs will be risk    
  adjusted. Joint DOT/HUD Project     
  Management Office (PMO) personnel   
  will monitor risk on a periodic     
  basis. The joint PMO will be        
  comprised of grant, IT, financial   
  and project management personnel to 
  cover multiple areas of risk. The   
  CoE effort will follow the PMI      
  project management ANSI standard.   
  ----------------------------------- -----------------------------------

+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **II.C. Cost and Schedule         |                                   |
| Performance**                     |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|                                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **1. Does the earned value        | No                                |
| management system meet the        |                                   |
| criteria in ANSI/EIA              |                                   |
| Standard-748?**                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|                                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **2. Answer the following         |                                   |
| questions about current           |                                   |
| cumulative cost and schedule      |                                   |
| performance. The numbers reported |                                   |
| below should reflect current      |                                   |
| actual information. (Per OMB      |                                   |
| requirements Cost/Schedule        |                                   |
| Performance information should    |                                   |
| include both Government and       |                                   |
| Contractor Costs):**              |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   a. What is the Planned Value | 0                                 |
| (PV)?**                           |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   b. What is the Earned Value  | 0                                 |
| (EV)?**                           |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   c. What is the actual cost   | 0                                 |
| of work performed (AC)?**         |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   d. What costs are included   | Contractor Only                   |
| in the reported Cost/Schedule     |                                   |
| Performance information           |                                   |
| (Government Only/Contractor       |                                   |
| Only/Both)?**                     |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   e. \"As of\" date:**         |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **3. What is the calculated       | 0                                 |
| Schedule Performance Index (SPI=  |                                   |
| EV/PV)?**                         |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **4. What is the schedule         | 0                                 |
| variance (SV = EV-PV)?**          |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **5. What is the calculated Cost  | 0                                 |
| Performance Index (CPI =          |                                   |
| EV/AC)?**                         |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **6. What is the cost variance    | 0                                 |
| (CV=EV-AC)?**                     |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **7. Is the CV% or SV% greater    | No                                |
| than +/- 10%? (CV%= CV/EV x 100;  |                                   |
| SV%= SV/PV x 100)**               |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   a. If \"yes,\" was it the?** |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   b. If \"yes,\" explain the   |                                   |
| variance:**                       |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|                                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   c. If \"yes,\" what          |                                   |
| corrective actions are being      |                                   |
| taken?**                          |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|                                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **   d. What is most current      | 0                                 |
| \"Estimate at Completion\"?**     |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **8. Have any significant changes | No                                |
| been made to the baseline during  |                                   |
| the past fiscal year?**           |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **8. If \"yes,\" when was it      | No                                |
| approved by OMB?**                |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|                                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **Comparison of Initial Baseline  |                                   |
| and Current Approved Baseline**   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|   ------------- ----              |                                   |
| ----------- ------------ -------- |                                   |
| ------- -------------- ---------- |                                   |
| -- ------------- ------------ --- |                                   |
| --------- ---------- ------------ |                                   |
|   **Milestone   *                 |                                   |
| *Description   **Initial          |                                   |
|            **Current              |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
| **Current               **Percent |                                   |
|   Number**      of                |                                   |
|  Milestone**  Baseline**          |                                   |
|           Baseline**              |                                   |
|                                 B |                                   |
| aseline                Complete** |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|          Variance**               |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                         **Planned |                                   |
|     **Total Cost    **Completion  |                                   |
|                **Total            |                                   |
|          **Schedule   **Cost**    |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                         Completio |                                   |
| n   (Estimated)**   Date**        |                                   |
|                Cost**             |                                   |
|          (# days)**               |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                         Date**    |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                     **Planned**   |                                   |
|   **Actual**   **Planned**   **Ac |                                   |
| tual**                            |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                \% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|       Redacted        Redacted    |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                0% |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
|   Redacted                        |                                   |
|    Redacted        Redacted     R |                                   |
| edacted        ** **          **  |                                   |
| **                                |                                   |
|                             ** ** |                                   |
|   ------------- ----              |                                   |
| ----------- ------------ -------- |                                   |
| ------- -------------- ---------- |                                   |
| -- ------------- ------------ --- |                                   |
| --------- ---------- ------------ |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
|                                   |                                   |
+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+