# U.S. Department of Energy

# Compliance Strategy

# for E.O. 13149

![](media/image1.wmf){width="1.7in" height="1.7in"}

####### 

####### 

####### 

#######  **June 2001**

**Prepared by:**

**Office of Transportation Technologies**

**1000 Independence Ave, SW**

**Washington, D.C. 20585**

# Contents

**List of Tables** ii

**Executive Summary** 1

**I. Data Collection and Analysis** 3

I-1 DOE Baseline Petroleum Fuel Use 3

I-2 DOE Fleet Characteristics 4

I-3 Basic Assumptions 6 I-4 Compliance Approach Analysis 6

\(1\) Biodiesel Blend Use 7

\(2\) AFV Acquisition and Alternative Fuel Use 7

\(3\) Acquisition of Higher Fuel Economy Vehicles 11

\(4\) Fleet Efficiency Improvements 13

**II. AFV Training Program** 13

**III. Fleet Management Issues** 14

**IV. Results of DOE Strategy** 14

**V. Strategy Compliance Evaluation** 15

**VI. Recognition and Awards** 15

**Attachments:** **Individual DOE Fleet Location Analyses** 17

BPA-Willamette 18

Brookhaven National Laboratory 19

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) 20

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory 21

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 22

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 23

Los Alamos National Laboratory 24

NETL Morgantown 25

NETL Pittsburgh 26

Nevada Test Site 27

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 28

Oak Ridge National Laboratory 29

Pantex 30

Richland-Hanford Site 31

Sandia National Laboratory-Kirtland 32

Savannah River Site 33

**List of Tables**

1.  Planned FY 2005 Petroleum Reduction by Strategic Approach 2

2\. Data Requirements 3

3\. DOE Fleetwide Petroleum Fuel Usage for FY 1999 4

4\. FY 1999 Fuel Use Breakdown for DOE 4

5.  Selected Fleet Locations for DOE-Wide Strategy 5

6.  Summary of B20 Use in DOE Strategy........................ 7

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
7.  Summary of AFV Fuel Savings 7

8.  Projected AFV Refueling Infrastructure Costs 10

9.  Summary of Higher Fuel Economy Savings 11

10. The Acquisition of Higher Fuel Economy Vehicles at

Brookhaven National Laboratory 12

11. Summary of Fleet Efficiency Fuel Savings 13

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
12. DOE Compliance Strategy Results 16

# U.S. Department of Energy Compliance Strategy for E.O. 13149

# 

**Executive Summary**

###### Executive Order (E.O.) 13149, G*reening the Government through Federal Fleet and Transportation Efficiency, wa*s signed by the President on April 21, 2000. The order requires Federal agencies to reduce their vehicle petroleum consumption by 20 percent, relative to their FY 1999 baseline, through the use of alternative fuel in alternative fuel vehicles and improvements in fleet fuel efficiency.

One of the requirements of E.O. 13149 is for each agency to develop a
comprehensive strategy that illustrates how it will achieve the
petroleum reduction goals. For the Department of Energy, the Office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy was given lead responsibility for
developing this compliance strategy. The office's efforts were
coordinated with individual Department of Energy fleet managers to gain
operational input and commitment to the strategy, which were viewed as
key to its future success. The strategy also responds to other
Departmental program initiatives having related petroleum reduction
goals, such as the Energy Policy Act and the Secretary's Pollution
Prevention and Energy Efficiency Leadership Goals. Through discussions
with and input from the key managers of these programs, the strategy
ensures fleet compliance with the goals of the Energy Policy Act of 1992
and the Secretary's Pollution Prevention and Energy Efficiency
Leadership Goals, while at the same time meeting the requirements and
objectives of the Executive Order.

The specific elements of the strategy include the use of biodiesel in
vehicles with diesel engines, the use of other alternative fuels, the
acquisition of light-duty vehicles with higher fuel economy, and
improvements in the overall efficiency of fleet vehicle operations. The
approach taken in developing this strategy is consistent with the
general guidance of *The Federal Fleet Strategy Development
Supplement*[^1]. It entailed a review of the Department of Energy's
fleet composition and characteristics, identification of favorable
individual fleet locations, and a "roll-up" of each individual
location's strategy to form an overall agency-wide strategy that meets
the goals of E.O. 13149.

Table 1 summarizes the estimated petroleum use reduction that will be
achieved by each element of the Department's compliance strategy. The
quantities in the table are given in gasoline gallon equivalents.
Specific details on how each of these reductions will be achieved are
provided in Section I-4 of this strategy. As shown in Table 1, in fiscal
year 2005 it is expected that the implementation of the strategy will
achieve as much as 34 percent reduction in the agency's on-road vehicle
petroleum consumption by end of fiscal year 2005, which exceeds the 20
percent reduction goal of E.O. 13149.

**Table 1. Planned FY 2005 Petroleum Reduction by Strategic Approach**

+--------+---------+--------------+-----------+-----------------------+
| **Red  |         |              | **Planned |                       |
| uction |         |              | Total     |                       |
| by     |         |              | Petroleum |                       |
| Str    |         |              | Reduction |                       |
| ategic |         |              | in FY     |                       |
| Appr   |         |              | 2005**    |                       |
| oach** |         |              |           |                       |
+--------+---------+--------------+-----------+-----------------------+
| Use of | Use of  | Fuel         | Total     | \% Reduction          |
| Bio    | Alte    | Economy/     |           |                       |
| diesel | rnative |              | GGE       |                       |
|        | Fuels   | Fleet        |           |                       |
| (      |         | Efficiency   |           |                       |
| GGE)\* | (GGE)   |              |           |                       |
|        |         | Improvements |           |                       |
|        |         |              |           |                       |
|        |         | (GGE)        |           |                       |
+--------+---------+--------------+-----------+-----------------------+
| 4      | 1,      | 276,977      | **1,      | **33.8**              |
| 73,745 | 222,511 |              | 973,233** |                       |
+--------+---------+--------------+-----------+-----------------------+

# *\* GGE = Gasoline Gallons Equivalent*

# 

Fleet reporting, and tracking of compliance with the Department's
strategy and the E.O. 13149 in general, will be performed using the new
Web-based database system, the Federal Automotive Statistical Tool. The
Department, in cooperation with the General Services Administration's
Office of Government-Wide Policy, developed the system based on the
Vehicle Information Data System reporting mechanism that the
Department's fleets utilized in fiscal year 1999 to report their fuel
consumption and alternative fuel vehicle activities. The new system is
user-friendly and provides agency-wide roll-up features for effective
management of fleet activities under E.O. 13149 and other programs. The
system has been approved by the Field Management Council, and does not
impose any new reporting requirements on Departmental fleets. Instead,
it satisfies three Federal reporting requirements: E.O. 13149, the
Energy Policy Act of 1992, and the General Services Administration's
SF-82 Agency Report of Motor Vehicle Data.

The Department has also assessed the cost impacts of the agency's
strategy on individual fleets. To offset the higher price of some types
of alternative fuel vehicles compared to conventional vehicles, the
Department of Energy established a "memorandum of understanding" with
the General Services Administration that states that fleets that lease
alternative fuel vehicles through the General Services Administration
will pay the same monthly charge for alternative fuel vehicles as for
leasing gasoline vehicles. The additional costs are recovered through a
small monthly surcharge on all vehicles leased from the General Services
Administration throughout the entire Department of Energy fleet. This
means that all Departmental fleets that lease vehicles from the General
Services Administration will share in the additional costs of
alternative fuel vehicle acquisition rather than just the fleets using
the vehicles. For vehicles leased from the General Services
Administration, the monthly mileage fees cover the fuel costs and are
the same regardless of vehicle fuel type. The Department is also working
on securing funding (approximately \$1.9 million) for covering the
additional costs of installing on-site alternative fuel refueling
stations at a number of the Department's fleet locations.

The Department of Energy's strategy is focused yet flexible, and has a
high probability of success in achieving the required petroleum
reduction goals. It is consistent with and supports the requirements of
other Departmental programs aimed at achieving petroleum reductions,
incorporates a Web-based tracking system for fleets, and addresses the
cost impacts for individual fleets. It provides a compliance plan that
is consistent with the needs of the agency's fleets and the requirements
of individual fleet locations, while ensuring the Department provides
leadership among Federal agencies in reducing vehicle petroleum fuel
consumption.

**I. [Data Collection and Analysis]{.underline}**

To develop a strategy for the Department of Energy (DOE) to comply with
the petroleum use reduction goal of Executive Order (E.O.) 13149, the
agency first conducted an extensive data collection effort. Table 2
shows the types of data collected for each of the agency's fleets and
the sources used. The data collected was then used to develop the
baseline petroleum consumption, the baseline acquisitions' average fuel
economy, and a realistic strategy for achieving the goals of E.O. 13149.

Table 2. Data Requirements

+------------------------------------+---+---------------------------------+
| Data Requirement                   |   | Source                          |
+------------------------------------+---+---------------------------------+
| FY 1999 Petroleum Fuel Use         |   | SF-82 report                    |
| (gallons)                          |   |                                 |
|                                    |   | FEMP report                     |
| -   Total , non-road, and exempt   |   |                                 |
|     vehicle fuel use               |   |                                 |
+------------------------------------+---+---------------------------------+
| Fleet Composition and              | S |                                 |
| Characteristics                    | F |                                 |
|                                    | - |                                 |
| -   FY 1999 inventory and new      | 8 |                                 |
|     acquisitions (conventional and | 2 |                                 |
|     alternative fuel vehicles;     | r |                                 |
|     light-, medium-, and           | e |                                 |
|     heavy-duty; gasoline and       | p |                                 |
|     diesel)                        | o |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
| -   FY 1999 new acquisition model  | t |                                 |
|     breakdown                      |   |                                 |
|                                    | F |                                 |
| -   FY2000 and FY2001 projected    | E |                                 |
|     inventories and new            | M |                                 |
|     acquisitions (conventional and | P |                                 |
|     alternative fuel vehicles;     | r |                                 |
|     light-, medium-, and           | e |                                 |
|     heavy-duty; gasoline and       | p |                                 |
|     diesel)                        | o |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
| -   Number of exempt (security,    | t |                                 |
|     military, etc.) vehicles       |   |                                 |
|     purchased in FY1999 and their  | G |                                 |
|     annual fuel consumption        | S |                                 |
|                                    | A |                                 |
|                                    | A |                                 |
|                                    | u |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | D |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | s |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | n |                                 |
|                                    |   |                                 |
|                                    | G |                                 |
|                                    | S |                                 |
|                                    | A |                                 |
|                                    | F |                                 |
|                                    | l |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | D |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | s |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | n |                                 |
|                                    |   |                                 |
|                                    | G |                                 |
|                                    | S |                                 |
|                                    | A |                                 |
|                                    | K |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | l |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | n |                                 |
|                                    | g |                                 |
|                                    | R |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | p |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | , |                                 |
|                                    | [ |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | . |                                 |
|                                    | p |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | l |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | c |                                 |
|                                    | y |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
|                                    | k |                                 |
|                                    | s |                                 |
|                                    | . |                                 |
|                                    | g |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
|                                    | g |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | a |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | n |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | h |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | p |                                 |
|                                    | a |                                 |
|                                    | g |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | K |                                 |
|                                    | E |                                 |
|                                    | E |                                 |
|                                    | L |                                 |
|                                    | I |                                 |
|                                    | N |                                 |
|                                    | G |                                 |
|                                    | R |                                 |
|                                    | E |                                 |
|                                    | P |                                 |
|                                    | O |                                 |
|                                    | R |                                 |
|                                    | T |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | M |                                 |
|                                    | A |                                 |
|                                    | I |                                 |
|                                    | N |                                 |
|                                    | R |                                 |
|                                    | E |                                 |
|                                    | P |                                 |
|                                    | O |                                 |
|                                    | R |                                 |
|                                    | T |                                 |
|                                    | . |                                 |
|                                    | h |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | ] |                                 |
|                                    | ( |                                 |
|                                    | h |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | p |                                 |
|                                    | : |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | . |                                 |
|                                    | p |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | l |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | c |                                 |
|                                    | y |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
|                                    | k |                                 |
|                                    | s |                                 |
|                                    | . |                                 |
|                                    | g |                                 |
|                                    | o |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | / |                                 |
|                                    | ) |                                 |
|                                    |   |                                 |
|                                    | F |                                 |
|                                    | l |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | m |                                 |
|                                    | a |                                 |
|                                    | n |                                 |
|                                    | a |                                 |
|                                    | g |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | n |                                 |
|                                    | t |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | r |                                 |
|                                    | v |                                 |
|                                    | i |                                 |
|                                    | e |                                 |
|                                    | w |                                 |
|                                    | s |                                 |
+------------------------------------+---+---------------------------------+
| Combined Fuel Economy Ratings by   |   | DOE/EPA Fleet Fuel Economy      |
| Light Duty Vehicle Category        |   | Guide, MY 1999                  |
| (subcompact, compact, etc.)        |   |                                 |
+------------------------------------+---+---------------------------------+

#### **I-1. [DOE Baseline Petroleum Fuel Use]{.underline}**

The DOE-wide fleet use of gasoline and diesel fuel was determined for
fiscal year (FY) 1999, for both covered and non-covered vehicles.

A summary of the DOE-wide fuel use in FY 1999 is provided in Table 3.
For FY 1999, the DOE fleet used about 7.3 million gasoline gallons
equivalent (GGE) of petroleum fuel nationwide, with slightly more than
half of this (on both a gallon and GGE basis) made up of gasoline. This
data was based upon the Annual Report to Congress on Federal Government
Energy Management and Conservation Programs for FY 1999, submitted by
the Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) and
information provided to the General Services Administration (GSA) for
the FY 1999 SF-82 report.

Table 3. DOE Fleetwide Petroleum Fuel Usage for FY 1999

+-----------------+--------------------+------------+----------------+
| Fuel Type       | Total DOE          | GGE        | Total DOE      |
|                 | Petroleum Usage,   | Conversion |                |
|                 | FY 1999            |            | Petroleum      |
|                 |                    | Factor     | Usage,         |
|                 | (Gallons)          |            |                |
|                 |                    |            | FY 1999        |
|                 |                    |            |                |
|                 |                    |            | (GGE)          |
+-----------------+--------------------+------------+----------------+
| Gasoline        | 3,916,200          | 1.0        | 3,916,200      |
+-----------------+--------------------+------------+----------------+
| Diesel Fuel     | 3,014,000          | 1.147      | 3,457,058      |
+-----------------+--------------------+------------+----------------+
|                 |                    |            |                |
+-----------------+--------------------+------------+----------------+
| Total Petroleum |                    |            | 7,373,258      |
| Used            |                    |            |                |
+-----------------+--------------------+------------+----------------+

The non-road and exempt vehicle fuel use was subtracted from the total
fuel use figures to establish the Agency's baseline. This fuel use
baseline was then multiplied by 20 percent to determine the required
reduction goal. Based on this process, DOE's overall compliance strategy
must achieve a total of about 1.2 million GGE savings by FY 2005 when
compared with FY 1999 fuel consumption figures, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. FY 1999 Fuel Use Breakdown for DOE

+------------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+
| Total DOE  | DOE        | DOE         | DOE         | Baseline DOE  |
| Fleet-wide |            |             |             | Petroleum 20% |
| Petroleum  | Non-road   | Exempt      | Total       | Reduction     |
| Use (GGE)  | Petroleum  | Petroleum   | Covered     | Goal (GGE)    |
|            | Use (GGE)  | Use (GGE)   | Petroleum   |               |
|            |            |             | Use (GGE)   |               |
+------------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+
| 7,373,258  | 1,087,099  | 452,146     | 5,834,002   | **1,166,800** |
+------------+------------+-------------+-------------+---------------+

## 

## I-2. [DOE Fleet Characteristics]{.underline}

The DOE fleet is located in more than fifty individual sites across the
country, including program and operational offices. Fleet sizes at these
locations range from several thousand to less than a dozen. Because of
this complexity in the DOE fleet structure, the decision was made to
develop a compliance strategy based on parameters of individual fleet
locations rather than on an agency-wide basis.

To achieve the greatest impact from the location-based strategy, the
primary focus was placed on sixteen locations having larger DOE fleet
vehicles concentrations, with corresponding higher fuel consumption and
the potential for more attractive economics associated with refueling
infrastructure and vehicle maintenance support for alternative fuel
vehicles (AFVs). In 1999, the sixteen fleets were responsible for over
80 percent of the vehicle purchases and over 90 percent of the petroleum
consumption of the total DOE fleet. These fleets were selected for
implementing the strategy. Table 5 summarizes the data on petroleum use
and fleet inventory collected from these sixteen fleets. Note that the
majority of light duty vehicles operated by these fleets are leased
through GSA.

Table 5. Selected Fleet Locations for DOE-Wide Strategy

  ------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ------------
  DOE Fleet Location       FY1999      FY1999      FY 1999                         Percent LDV
                           Total       Covered     Fleet                           GSA-Leased
                           Petroleum   Petroleum   Inventory                       
                           Use (GGE)   Use (GGE)                                   
                                       \*                                          

                                                   LDV\*\*     MDV\*\*   HDV\*\*   

  BPA-Willamette           193,596     193,596     400         464       176       100

  Brookhaven National      157,280     129,179     244         41        3         0
  Laboratory                                                                       

  Fermi National           144,851     144,851     133         81        16        25
  Accelerator Laboratory                                                           

  Idaho National           1,062,272   1,022,714   698         15        249       0
  Engineering and                                                                  
  Environmental Laboratory                                                         

  Lawrence Berkeley        111,682     110,584     191         56        39        100
  National Laboratory                                                              

  Lawrence Livermore       506,337     462,255     808         51        54        100
  National Laboratory                                                              

  Los Alamos National      711,244     432,874     591         468       101       100
  Laboratory                                                                       

  National Renewable       16,926      15,462      36          12        0         100
  Energy Laboratory                                                                

  NETL-Morgantown          4,786       4,477       15          4         1         100

  NETL-Pittsburgh          11,421      9,876       42          7         4         90

  Nevada Test Site         1,708,950   1,289,307   1,040       170       257       100

  Oak Ridge National       667,132     420,293     1,741       220       216       25
  Laboratory                                                                       

  Pantex                   321,370     244,242     271         7         16        100

  Richland-Hanford Site    631,286     593,413     551         823       \-\--     100

  SNL-Kirtland             330,000     312,000     413         320       30        100

  Savannah River Site      711,951     366,706     1,472       \-\--     87        100

                                                                                   

  Total for Target Fleets  7,291,083   5,751,828   8,646       2,739     1,249     \-\--
  ------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ------------

\* Covered = Total - Nonroad - Exempt

\*\* LDV= light-duty vehicles; MDV= medium-duty vehicles; HDV=
heavy-duty vehicles

The remaining DOE fleet locations not identified in the strategy will be
encouraged to reduce their petroleum use by amounts stated in the
Executive Order, and will participate in the acquisition of higher fuel
economy vehicles and AFVs. In addition, all DOE fleet locations will be
required to meet the objectives of other internal or external fuel and
energy reduction initiatives. One such initiative is the Pollution
Prevention and Energy Efficiency (P2/E2) Leadership Goals effort
established by the Secretary in November 1999. The DOE P2/E2 Program
established three goals related to transportation:

1.  Reduce the annual petroleum consumption of the overall DOE fleet by
    at least 20 percent by 2005 in comparison to 1999, including
    improving the fuel economy of new light duty vehicle acquisitions,
    and by other means.

2.  At least 75 percent of new light duty vehicle acquisitions are to be
    alternative fuel vehicles, in accordance with the requirements of
    the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct).

3.  Increase the usage rate of alternative fuel in DOE alternative fuel
    vehicles to 75 percent by 2005, and 90 percent by 2010, in areas
    where alternative fuel infrastructure is available.

This DOE strategy for compliance with E.O. 13149 is consistent with
attaining each of these P2/E2 goals.

## I-3. [Basic Assumptions]{.underline}

A variety of assumptions were made in developing the DOE strategy,
including the following:

-   Biodiesel and E85 (a blend of 85 percent ethanol, 15 percent
    gasoline) fuel supplies are generally available or would become
    available in the near-term. Natural gas and electricity supplies are
    assumed to be currently available at each fleet location, unless
    otherwise known from discussions with fleet managers.

-   Projected vehicle acquisition rates for FY 2001 are assumed to
    remain stable through FY 2005.

-   Projected AFV acquisition rates for FY 2001 through FY 2005 are
    assumed to be 75 percent of new vehicle acquisitions for all fleet
    locations.

-   The mix (among types of fuels) of future AFV acquisitions is based
    on interviews with individual fleet managers, as well as fleet AFV
    acquisitions for FY 1999 and FY 2000, and projections for FY 2001.

-   Light duty vehicle turnover in DOE fleet locations is assumed to be
    five years, on average.

-   Activities will be undertaken to ensure new AFVs use alternative
    fuel 75 percent and conventional fuel 25 percent of the time on an
    average annual basis.

-   AFV refueling is assumed to follow an availability hierarchy: 1)
    using an existing on-site station, 2) using an existing public
    station, 3) constructing a new on-site station.

## I-4. [Compliance Approach Analysis]{.underline}

Previous DOE analyses indicated that simply purchasing AFVs and using
biodiesel at current rates within the DOE fleet would not result in the
required 20 percent reduction in petroleum use by FY 2005. Therefore, a
more comprehensive strategy was developed for reaching the 20 percent
reduction goal.

It was decided that the DOE compliance strategy would consist of four
core elements:

(1) Biodiesel Blend (B20) Use

(2) AFV Acquisitions and Alternative Fuel Use

(3) Acquisition of Higher Fuel Economy Vehicles

(4) Fleet Efficiency Improvements.

These options were chosen for their significant potential for petroleum
fuel savings for the DOE fleet. An analysis was performed for each
element to determine its potential for reducing petroleum fuel use in
the sixteen DOE fleets. Brief discussions of each of the four elements
and their application in the strategy follow. (Each discussion begins
with a table showing that element's contribution to the overall
strategy.)

###  **Biodiesel Blend Use**

**Table 6. Summary of B20 Use in DOE Strategy**

+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| Total DOE Covered | 20% Fuel     | Strategy Element  | Percent of   |
| Fuel Use in FY 99 |              | 1:                | Agency Fuel  |
| (GGE)             | Reduction    |                   | Reduction    |
|                   | Goal         | B20 Fuel Savings  | Goal         |
|                   |              |                   |              |
|                   | (GGE)        | (GGE)             |              |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| 5,834,002         | 1,166,800    | 473,745           | 40.6         |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+

[Discussion of B20]{.underline}

As the first element of DOE's strategy, B20 (a blend of 80 percent
petroleum diesel with 20 percent biodiesel) fuel is proposed to be used
in place of conventional diesel fuel at the sixteen fleet locations for
both vehicular and non-road diesel equipment. This B20 strategy is
estimated to result in an 18 percent GGE savings in annual diesel fuel
usage at each fleet location, because every gallon of B20 used displaces
about 18 percent of conventional diesel fuel when adjusted for energy
content. In terms of DOE's overall fuel reduction goal, the use of B20
at the targeted fleet locations achieves about 40.6 percent of the total
goal.

*Estimated Cost Impacts of B20*. Since B20 can be used in any
diesel-powered engine with no engine modifications or costs, both
on-road and non-road vehicles and equipment can be operated on B20. B20
can also be stored in existing diesel storage tanks without significant
modification or cost. For fleet locations without existing on-site
diesel storage and dispensing systems, such systems would have to be
installed or existing diesel tanks switched to biodiesel storage. B20
does cost slightly more per gallon (about \$0.20 more per gallon on
average) than conventional diesel fuel. However, no additional cost will
be incurred for GSA-leased vehicles since under the GSA contracts, DOE
fleets will pay the same for B20 fuel as for conventional diesel fuel.
GSA may not under current fuel reimbursement agreements, established
between the local GSA office and the DOE facility, reimburse the full
cost of B20 to fleet. The facility will need to implement a plan to
successfully renegotiate the fuel cost issue with the local GSA office.

(1) **[AFV Acquisitions and Alternative Fuel Use]{.underline}**

    Table 7. Summary of AFV Fuel Savings

+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| Total DOE Covered | 20% Fuel     | Strategy Element  | Percent of   |
| Fuel Use in FY 99 |              | 2:                | Agency Fuel  |
| (GGE)             | Reduction    |                   | Reduction    |
|                   | Goal         | AFV Fuel Savings  | Goal         |
|                   |              |                   |              |
|                   | (GGE)        | (GGE)             |              |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| 5,834,002         | 1,166,800    | 1,222,511         | 105\*        |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+

*\*This element alone exceeds the E.O. stated 20% goal*

[Discussion of AFV Acquisitions and Alternative Fuel Use]{.underline}

*AFV Acquisitions.* Future AFV acquisitions for each fleet location were
first estimated. Agency-wide AFV acquisition rates for FY 2001 and later
was set at 75 percent of total new vehicle acquisitions. This provides
an aggressive AFV introduction rate through FY 2005 for the strategy.
For those fleet locations covered by EPAct (eight of the sixteen are
EPAct-covered fleets), the 75 percent AFV acquisition rate is compliant
with EPAct requirements.

*Estimated Cost Impacts of AFV Acquisitions.* The incremental costs of
AFVs range from zero to several thousand dollars, depending on the AFV
type. However, a new DOE program, called the Fleet Surcharge Program,
will help offset the incremental costs of future AFV acquisitions under
this DOE strategy when vehicles are leased from the General Services
Administration (GSA). The Fleet Surcharge Program, approved by the
Deputy Secretary and instituted under an interagency agreement with the
General Services Administration (GSA), will place a small surcharge on
each DOE fleet vehicle leased from GSA beginning in FY 2001. This is
critical since the majority of vehicles operated by DOE fleets are
GSA-leased. The surcharge applies to all DOE fleet locations, not just
those included in this strategy. In this way, all DOE fleets will share
the cost burden of acquiring AFVs for the DOE fleet. The surcharge will
be part of the overall monthly lease cost of the vehicles. Surcharge
funds will be placed in a separate account for paying the incremental
cost of AFVs acquired in FY 2001 and in the years to follow. Those
fleets leasing AFVs will pay the same lease price as for conventional
gasoline vehicles.

*Alternative Fuel Use*. While individual DOE fleets are encouraged to
purchase dedicated vehicles, bi-fuel and flexible fuel vehicles will
also be acceptable. However, the strategy requires that, on average, new
AFVs use the alternative fuel for at least 75 percent of the time,
consistent with the Department's internal P2/E2 goals. Therefore, DOE
fleets can purchase a mix of dedicated, bi-fuel, and flexible fuel
vehicles as long as this AFV mix uses at least 75 percent alternative
fuel annually. DOE fleet managers will be held responsible for meeting
and maintaining the 75 percent alternative fuel use requirement by their
AFV fleets.

AFV fleet fuel consumption in FY 2005 was calculated by first estimating
the numbers of AFVs in service. Since a five-year light duty vehicle
turnover is assumed, only those AFVs acquired in FY 2001 through FY 2005
would still be in service in FY 2005. The amount of petroleum fuel
displaced by the AFVs was estimated by multiplying the numbers of AFVs
by the annual per vehicle fuel consumption rate of the light duty
gasoline vehicles being displaced and multiplied by 75 percent. In
general, the annual per vehicle fuel consumption rate was calculated
from the fleet's FY 1999 gasoline usage and numbers of light duty
gasoline vehicles. For some fleets, this meant first subtracting out
estimated gasoline usage by medium and heavy-duty vehicles. An example
for the Lawrence Livermore fleet follows:

*Fleet Gasoline Usage in FY 1999 = 441,113 GGE*

*Number of Light Duty Gasoline Vehicles in FY 1999 = 829*

*Average Annual Light Duty Gasoline Vehicle Fuel Rate = 441,113/829 =
532 GGE/Vehicle*

*Projected Numbers of New AFVs in Service in FY 2005 = 415*

*Percentage of Alternative Fuel Use by AFVs = 75%*

*Total Petroleum Fuel Displaced by AFVs in FY 2005 = **415\*532\*0.75 =
165,585 GGE***

As summarized in table 7 above, a total of 1,222,511 GGE are saved with
this approach, which is five percent higher than the overall fuel
reduction goal of 1,166,800 GGE.

*Estimated Cost Impacts of Alternative Fuel Use.* Recent national
average retail cost figures for E85, liquefied petroleum gasoline (LPG),
and compressed natural gas (CNG) are \$1.99/GGE, \$1.62/GGE and
\$0.89/GGE, respectively. Electricity on average nationally is about
\$0.03 to 0.07/kw-hr which equates to about 1 to 2 cents/mile. However,
for vehicles leased through GSA, the monthly mileage fees charged by GSA
cover the fuel costs and are the same regardless of vehicle fuel type.
Therefore, any higher costs or savings from use of alternative fuel are
borne by GSA and not by the fleet leasing the AFV.

*AFV refueling infrastructure*. The use of alternative fuel vehicles is
the most effective means of reducing petroleum fuel use if they are
operated on alternative fuels. Therefore, key factors in assigning
particular types of AFVs to specific fleet locations will be the
availability of on-site or public AFV refueling stations, and a
commitment by vehicle operators to using alternative fuels a substantial
part of the time in these vehicles. If alternative fuels are not
available, provisions must be made for installing AFV refueling
equipment. Because of the additional costs associated with using AFVs
compared with conventional vehicles, careful consideration will be given
for placing these vehicles in appropriate fleets.

Infrastructure requirements were assessed for serving the projected AFV
populations at each fleet location. If an AFV refueling station already
exists on-site at the fleet location, the future AFVs should refuel
using that station. If an on-site station does not exist, but a public
station is available, the projected AFVs should use the public station.
And if neither an on-site nor a public station is available for a fleet
location, a new AFV refueling station will be needed for this location,
with the preference on a privately owned station as opposed to
government owned. The status of on-site and public refueling stations
was determined through fleet interviews and through the use of the DOE's
Alternative Fuel Data Center's AFV refueling locator
([www.afdc.doe.gov)]().

*Estimated Cost Impacts of AFV Refueling Infrastructure.* The projected
costs of the new on-site stations were obtained from individual fleet
managers for planned installations, or estimated based on installation
costs reported in technical literature. Costs represent required
installations for serving the projected AFV fleet populations for FY
2005. Table 8 provides an overall summary of estimated AFV
infrastructure costs for the DOE fleet. Total AFV fleet refueling
infrastructure costs were estimated at about \$ 2.7 million. It should
be noted that \$850,000 of these costs are already funded through a
government/industry cost-shared project under the DOE's AFV USER
Program. The DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
has identified funds in expired interagency agreements that will be
de-obligated to cover the remaining infrastructure costs.

Some DOE fleets have been successful at negotiating the installation of
an AFV refueling station with a local fuel provider at minimal extra
cost to the fleet. The fleets simply agreed to purchase a specific
volume of alternative fuel from the station annually at an agreed fuel
price. Also, ensuring that other Federal and non-Federal fleets in the
area with AFVs commit to using the station will prevent any shortfalls
of the agreed upon fuel use volume over the period of the contract. One
such fleet is Los Alamos National Laboratory, which recently had a local
E85 fuel provider install a refueling station near the site at no cost
to DOE.

Table 8. Projected AFV Refueling Infrastructure Costs

+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| DOE Fleet Location      | Available   | AFV     |         |         |
|                         | On-Site or  | Re      |         |         |
|                         | Public AFV  | fueling |         |         |
|                         | Refueling?  | Infrast |         |         |
|                         |             | ructure |         |         |
|                         |             | Costs   |         |         |
|                         |             | (\$)    |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
|                         |             | E85     | CNG     | E       |
|                         |             |         |         | lectric |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| BPA-Willamette          | No          | 35,000  | 200,000 | \-\--   |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Brookhaven National     | No          | \-\--   | 480,000 | \-\--   |
| Laboratory              |             |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Fermilab                | Yes (CNG)   | 75,000  | \-\--   | \-\--   |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Idaho National          | Yes (LCNG)  | \-\--   | \-\--   | \-\--   |
| Engineering and         |             |         |         |         |
| Environmental           |             |         |         |         |
| Laboratory              |             |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lawrence Berkeley       | Yes (CNG)   | 35,000  | \-\--   | 110,000 |
| National Laboratory     |             |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Lawrence Livermore      | Yes (CNG)\* | 50,000  | 850,    | \-\--   |
| National Laboratory     |             |         | 000\*\* |         |
| (LLNL)                  |             |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Los Alamos National     | Yes         | \-\--   | \-\--   | \-\--   |
| Laboratory              |             |         |         |         |
|                         | (CNG, E85,  |         |         |         |
|                         | Elect)      |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| National Renewable      | Yes         | \-\--   | \-\--   | \-\--   |
| Energy Laboratory       |             |         |         |         |
|                         | (CNG, E85,  |         |         |         |
|                         | Elect)      |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| NETL-Morgantown         | Yes (CNG    | \-\--   | 125,000 | \-\--   |
|                         | slow)       |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| NETL-Pittsburgh         | Yes (CNG    | \-\--   | 125,000 | \-\--   |
|                         | slow)       |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Nevada Test Site (NTS)  | Yes         | 50,000  | 500,000 | \-\--   |
|                         | (CNG)\*\*\* |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Oak Ridge National      | Yes (CNG)   | 50,000  | \-\--   | \-\--   |
| Laboratory              |             |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Pantex                  | Yes (CNG)   | 50,000  | \-\--   | \-\--   |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Richland-Hanford Site   | No          | 35,000  | \-\--   | \-\--   |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| SNL-Kirtland            | Yes (E85 &  | \-\--   | \-\--   | \-\--   |
|                         | CNG)        |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Savannah River Site     | Yes (E85)   | \-\--   | \-\--   | \-\--   |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
|                         |             |         |         |         |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+
| Totals                  | \-\--       | \$      | \$2,    | \$      |
|                         |             | 355,000 | 280,000 | 110,000 |
+-------------------------+-------------+---------+---------+---------+

\* The existing CNG station at LLNL is a slow-fill station that no
longer meets the needs of the fleet and is being replaced with a
fast-fill station.

\*\* LLNL has already received funding under the DOE AFV USER Program to
partially cover the costs of this station and the remaining costs are
being borne by the fuel/station provider.

\*\*\*A CNG public station is available in Las Vegas for the smaller
portion of the NTS fleet, however infrastructure is needed at the test
site to support the majority of the NTS fleet.

(2) **[Acquisition of Higher Fuel Economy Vehicles]{.underline}**

########  Table 9. Summary of Higher Fuel Economy Savings

+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| Total DOE Covered | 20% Fuel     | Strategy Element  | Percent of   |
| Fuel Use in FY 99 |              | 3:                | Agency Fuel  |
| (GGE)             | Reduction    |                   | Reduction    |
|                   | Goal         | Higher FE Fuel    | Goal         |
|                   |              | Savings           |              |
|                   | (GGE)        |                   |              |
|                   |              | (GGE)             |              |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| 5,834,002         | 1,166,800    | 50,352            | 4.3          |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+

[Discussion of Higher Fuel Economy]{.underline}

Fuel savings due to increases in the new fleet vehicle average fuel
economy were estimated based on the projected numbers of
petroleum-fueled light duty vehicle purchases over the period of FY 2001
through FY 2005, and the annual per vehicle fuel consumption rates of
these vehicles. Due to the importance of this strategy element, and to
achieving some equity among DOE fleets in sharing the burden of this
compliance strategy, it is planned that [all]{.underline} DOE fleet
locations will be required to meet the higher fuel economy schedule, not
just the sixteen targeted locations.

It is anticipated that the DOE fleet would meet the increased average
fuel economies of 1.0 mpg by FY 2002 and 3.0 mpg by FY 2005 compared
with the FY 1999 baseline by pursuing the following schedule for fleet
fuel economy increases in new acquisitions between 2001 and 2005:

-   *0.5 mpg increase in FY 2001*

-   *1.0 mpg increase in FY 2002*

-   *2.0 mpg increase in FY 2003*

-   *2.5 mpg increase in FY 2004*

-   *3.0 mpg increase in FY 2005*

For ***each*** DOE fleet location (since all fleets will participate in
this element), FY 1999 baseline average fleet fuel economies were
calculated for the vehicle types acquired in that year. For some fleet
locations, the baseline fuel economies were calculated from the actual
new model acquisitions in FY 1999 and the *Department of
Energy/Environmental Protection Agency's Fleet Fuel Economy Guide*. For
most fleet locations, however, data was only available for vehicle class
and size, not models. As a result, baseline fuel economies were
estimated for these vehicles. These estimates were derived by first
placing the light duty vehicle acquisitions into size categories, then
obtaining the average fuel economies for those categories from the
*Department of Energy/Environmental Protection Agency's Fleet Fuel
Economy Guide*. In all cases, fleet average fuel economies were
calculated using the harmonic averaging method, as described in DOE's
guidance document for Federal agencies on E.O. 13149[^2].

It is anticipated that the schedule for achieving the required fuel
economy increase from 2001 through 2005 would be met by individual
fleets acquiring vehicles with smaller engines and two-wheel versus
four-wheel drives, as well as gasoline hybrid vehicles. However, it will
be left to the individual fleets to decide the best means of achieving
the fuel economy increases through their annual vehicle acquisition
plans.

Table 10 presents data from the Lawrence Livermore fleet to derive the
fuel savings achieved at this location by acquiring higher fuel economy
vehicles. In this example, the annual per vehicle fuel consumption rates
for the new light duty vehicles were calculated from the original per
vehicle fuel consumption rate for FY 1999 (532 GGE for Lawrence
Livermore), the increased fleet average fuel economy for the given
fiscal year (e.g., 18.4 mpg in FY 2001), and the original FY 1999 fleet
average fuel economy (17.9 mpg), as follows:

*Annual GGE for New LDV in FY 2001 = 532\*17.9/18.4 = 518 GGE*

As provided in Table 9, fuel savings associated with higher fuel economy
vehicles are estimated to be 50,352 GGE, which equates to about 4.3
percent of the required DOE fuel reduction goal.

**Table 10. The Acquisition of Higher Fuel Economy Vehicles at Lawrence
Livermore**

+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
|                 | FY2001 | FY2002  | FY2003  | FY2004   | FY 2005 |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
| New LDVs        | 27     | 27      | 27      | 27       | 27      |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
| Annual          | 518    | 504     | 479     | 467      | 456     |
|                 |        |         |         |          |         |
| GGE/New LDV     |        |         |         |          |         |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
| Fuel Usage for  | 13,976 | 13,606  | 12,921  | 12,604   | 12,303  |
| New LDVs (GGE)  |        |         |         |          |         |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
| Fuel Usage for  | 14,364 | 14,364  | 14,364  | 14,364   | 14,364  |
| FY 1999 LDVs at |        |         |         |          |         |
| 532GGE/LDV      |        |         |         |          |         |
| (GGE)           |        |         |         |          |         |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
| Fuel Saved      | 388    | 758     | 1,443   | 1,760    | 2,061   |
| (GGE) for New   |        |         |         |          |         |
| LDVs            |        |         |         |          |         |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+
| Total Fuel      |        |         |         |          | **      |
| Saved in FY2005 |        |         |         |          | 6,410** |
| (GGE)           |        |         |         |          |         |
+-----------------+--------+---------+---------+----------+---------+

*Estimated Cost Impacts of Higher Fuel Economy.* The acquisition of
conventional high fuel economy vehicles should provide no additional
cost impact to DOE fleets. In fact, higher fuel economy vehicles tend to
be smaller vehicles with smaller displacement engines whose capital or
lease costs are lower than vehicles with lower fuel economies. In
addition, the fuel savings realized by fleets due to higher fuel economy
vehicle use would result in lower fleet fuel costs.

(3) **[Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

########  Table 11. Summary of Fleet Efficiency Fuel Savings

+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| Total DOE Covered | 20% Fuel     | Strategy Element  | Percent of   |
| Fuel Use in FY 99 |              | 4:                | Agency Fuel  |
| (GGE)             | Reduction    |                   | Reduction    |
|                   | Goal         | Fleet Efficiency  | Goal         |
|                   |              |                   |              |
|                   | (GGE)        | Fuel Savings      |              |
|                   |              |                   |              |
|                   |              | (GGE)             |              |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+
| 5,834,002         | 1,166,800    | 226,626           | 19.4         |
+-------------------+--------------+-------------------+--------------+

[Discussion of Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}

The strategy requires that each fleet location establish a fleet
efficiency improvement plan that achieves a minimum 2 percent reduction
in overall fleet petroleum fuel consumption relative to the baseline.
For a small number of DOE fleets which have low petroleum reductions for
the first three elements of the strategy, a minimum 10 to 15 percent
reduction resulting from fleet efficiency improvements is suggested in
order to achieve higher overall fuel reductions for those locations. A
fleet can also exceed the specific goals of the first three strategy
elements, in lieu of meeting its fleet efficiency goals, as long as the
same overall fuel reduction required by the DOE strategy is achieved.

The DOE strategy does not stipulate which types of efficiency
improvement techniques must be instituted by individual fleets. Each
fleet manager will assess his or her fleet's efficiency in accomplishing
its mission. Using compact sedans in preference to large sedans,
rescheduling or combining routes to increase vehicle passenger
capacities, and decreasing vehicle trips per day should all be
considered in achieving a reduction in petroleum use. An added benefit
of these improvements could be increased personnel productivity.

The projected DOE-wide fleet efficiency improvements resulted in 226,626
GGE of fuel savings. This is equal to about 19.4 percent of the total
fuel reduction goal of 1,166,800 GGE, as indicated in Table 11.

*Estimated Cost Impacts of Fleet Efficiency Improvements.* The
implementation of fleet efficiency improvements among DOE's fleets
should provide a positive cost impact for their operations. The
resulting reductions in fleet fuel use, potential reductions in vehicle
maintenance, and increases in personnel productivity should all serve to
reduce overall fleet operational costs.

II. **[AFV Training Program]{.underline}**

Given the importance of AFV acquisition and utilization to the DOE
compliance strategy, AFV training for fleet personnel will be a key
component to its success. Through an orchestrated training program,
fleet personnel can become familiar with AFV technology and operation,
safety issues, and proper refueling procedures. Most alternative fuel
providers offer this type of training as part of an initial fuel
purchase contract or refueling station installation. DOE EERE will
assist fleets in negotiating AFV training as part of these contracts for
their facilities.

III. **[Fleet Management Issues]{.underline}**

E.O. 13149 requires that Federal agencies ensure that all
government-owned and government-operated vehicles, as well as
contractor-operated vehicles under its jurisdiction, comply with goals
and objectives of the executive order. This means that contractors must
be made aware of and commit to the requirements of E.O. 13149 and this
compliance strategy. DOE managers will need to modify contracts with
contractors that operate vehicles to ensure compliance under this
strategy. DOE's Office of Management and Administration will soon issue
guidance to DOE fleets on this issue.

The Department recognizes certain environmental issues that are
addressed by E.O. 13149, as well as the earlier E.O. 13101 on "Greening
the Government." These Executive Orders require the use of re-refined
lubricating oils, with API certification meeting manufacturer's
performance standards, in Federal and contractor vehicles, as well as
the use of retread tires and tires with recycled content when they are
reasonably available and meet performance standards. As directed in the
memorandum from Stephen J. Michelsen, Director of the Office of Resource
Management, on April 18, 2001, DOE fleet shall use re-refined oil as
outlined in these orders. DOE also encourages the use of bio-based
products as part of its compliance strategy.

# [Results of DOE Strategy]{.underline}

The results expected from implementing the DOE strategy are provided in
Table 12. (The analyses of individual fleet locations for developing the
strategy results are provided as the Attachments to this document.)
Estimated fuel savings are shown for each DOE fleet location. Under this
strategy, the largest petroleum use reductions will be achieved through
the acquisition of AFVs and use of alternative fuel. The fleet location
projected to have the largest total fleet petroleum reduction is the
Nevada Test Site, with savings of about 532,900 GGE. All of the targeted
fleets are projected to reduce their fleet fuel usage by more than the
20 percent goal. Overall, the strategy's DOE-wide fleet fuel reduction
of about 2.0 million GGE is equal to about a 34 percent decrease
relative to the FY 1999 covered fuel baseline, well in excess of the 20
percent goal.

In addition, the DOE strategy achieves both performance measures
established by E.O. 13149. The order requires the use of alternative
fuels in AFVs the majority (greater than 50 percent) of the time, and
requires the purchase of higher fuel economy petroleum fueled vehicles
to achieve the 1.0 mpg increase in fleet average fuel economy by FY
2002, and the 3.0 mpg increase by FY 2005.

IV. **[Strategy Compliance Evaluation]{.underline}**

DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), in
conjunction with GSA's Office of Government-wide Policy, has recently
developed a Web-based reporting tool, called the Federal Automotive
Statistical Tool (FAST) for evaluating E.O. 13149 compliance. FAST was
based on the Vehicle Information Data System, or VIDS, which DOE fleets
became familiar with during FY1999. Many of the data input screens of
FAST are identical to those used in VIDS. The Field Management Council
has approved the use of the FAST system to collect data from
Departmental fleets. FAST can be accessed at the following website:

http://fastweb.inel.gov

The FAST system does not impose any new reporting requirements on DOE
fleets. Instead, it satisfies three Federal reporting requirements: E.O.
13149, EPACT, and GSA's SF-82 Agency Report of Motor Vehicle Data. This
ability for fleets to report data for all three programs under FAST
should greatly streamline the reporting process. FAST will also provide
a unique management tool for fleet managers for characterizing and
assessing fleet activities. Compliance with this strategy will be
reviewed each year through the use of FAST, and adjustments will be made
as necessary to keep pace with evolving DOE fleet requirements.
Compliance with using re-refined oil and retread tires will be evaluated
based on sites' annual RCRA/E.O. 13101 reports.

##### VI. Recognition and Awards

###### As part of its strategy, special recognition or awards will be given for DOE personnel and/or fleets that exceed the strategy's requirements or exhibit particularly noteworthy leadership in attaining its objectives and the goals of the Executive Order. The nature of this recognition has not yet been determined, but it will likely be similar to the GSA EPACT Award that provides \$2,000 (after tax) to each of two awardees each year. A ceremony will be held at DOE headquarters, potentially in October in conjunction with DOE's P2/E2 awards, to recognize the awardees. It is anticipated that representatives of the Secretary's Office will present the awards.

**Table 12. DOE Compliance Strategy Results**

<table>
<colgroup>
<col style="width: 8%" />
<col style="width: 9%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 3%" />
<col style="width: 4%" />
<col style="width: 3%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 6%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 7%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
<col style="width: 5%" />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td rowspan="5">PSO</td>
<td rowspan="5">Targeted DOE Location</td>
<td colspan="4">FY 1999 Fleet Fuel Use</td>
<td rowspan="5"><p>Baseline</p>
<p>LDV FE</p>
<p>(mpg)</p></td>
<td colspan="4" rowspan="3">FY 1999 Fleet Inventory</td>
<td rowspan="5"><p>Required</p>
<p>On-site</p>
<p>AFV Infra</p>
<p>Costs</p></td>
<td colspan="3" rowspan="2"><p>DOE Strategy Fuel Savings</p>
<p>in FY 2005 (GGE)</p></td>
<td colspan="2" rowspan="4">Total FY 2005 Savings</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="4"><p>Total</p>
<p>Fuel Use</p>
<p>(GGE)</p></td>
<td rowspan="4"><p>Non-Road</p>
<p>Fuel use</p>
<p>(GGE)</p></td>
<td rowspan="4"><p>Exempt</p>
<p>Fuel Use</p>
<p>(GGE)</p></td>
<td rowspan="4"><p>Total</p>
<p>Covered</p>
<p>Fuel Use</p>
<p>(GGE)</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td rowspan="3">Biodiesel</td>
<td rowspan="3">AFV Use</td>
<td rowspan="3"><p>Fuel Economy/</p>
<p>Fleet Efficiency</p>
<p>Improvements</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="2">LDV</td>
<td rowspan="2">M/HDV</td>
<td rowspan="2">AFV</td>
<td rowspan="2"><p>Exempt</p>
<p>Vehicles</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>GGE</td>
<td>% Reduction</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>BPA</td>
<td>BPA-Willamette</td>
<td>193,596</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>193,596</td>
<td>16.7</td>
<td>400</td>
<td>640</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>$235,000</td>
<td>29,172</td>
<td>14,400</td>
<td>8,760</td>
<td>52,331</td>
<td>27.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td rowspan="5">Defense Programs</td>
<td>Los Alamos</td>
<td>711,244</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>278,371</td>
<td>432,874</td>
<td>16.5</td>
<td>591</td>
<td>569</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>263</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>32,877</td>
<td>72,075</td>
<td>10,637</td>
<td>115,589</td>
<td>26.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Nevada Test Site</td>
<td>1,708,950</td>
<td>407,295</td>
<td>12,348</td>
<td>1,289,307</td>
<td>16.8</td>
<td>1,040</td>
<td>427</td>
<td>111</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>$550,000</td>
<td>105,085</td>
<td>385,875</td>
<td>41,929</td>
<td>532,889</td>
<td>41.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Pantex</td>
<td>321,370</td>
<td>77,128</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>244,242</td>
<td>16.8</td>
<td>271</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>63</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>$50,000</td>
<td>20,165</td>
<td>98,280</td>
<td>9,282</td>
<td>127,727</td>
<td>52.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>SNL-Kirtland</td>
<td>330,000</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>18,000</td>
<td>312,000</td>
<td>16.5</td>
<td>413</td>
<td>350</td>
<td>84</td>
<td>24</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>11,394</td>
<td>71,160</td>
<td>9,389</td>
<td>91,943</td>
<td>29.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Lawrence Livermore</td>
<td>506,337</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>44,082</td>
<td>462,255</td>
<td>17.9</td>
<td>808</td>
<td>105</td>
<td>121</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>$900,000</td>
<td>11,780</td>
<td>165,585</td>
<td>15,655</td>
<td>193,020</td>
<td>41.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Energy Efficiency</td>
<td>NREL</td>
<td>16,926</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>1,464</td>
<td>15,462</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>149</td>
<td>13,451</td>
<td>309</td>
<td>13,909</td>
<td>90.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td rowspan="3">Environmental Management</td>
<td>Idaho Eng. &amp; Environ. Site</td>
<td>1,062,272</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>39,558</td>
<td>1,022,714</td>
<td>16.4</td>
<td>698</td>
<td>264</td>
<td>125</td>
<td>57</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>119,991</td>
<td>67,665</td>
<td>23,466</td>
<td>211,102</td>
<td>20.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Richland-Hanford Site</td>
<td>631,286</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>37,873</td>
<td>593,413</td>
<td>16.4</td>
<td>551</td>
<td>823</td>
<td>84</td>
<td>92</td>
<td>$35,000</td>
<td>24,337</td>
<td>12,420</td>
<td>89,414</td>
<td>126,172</td>
<td>21.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Savannah River Site</td>
<td>711,951</td>
<td>336,071</td>
<td>9,174</td>
<td>366,706</td>
<td>16.0</td>
<td>1,472</td>
<td>87</td>
<td>284</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>68,982</td>
<td>161,588</td>
<td>14,338</td>
<td>244,908</td>
<td>66.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="2">Fossil Energy</td>
<td>NETL-Morgantown</td>
<td>4,786</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>309</td>
<td>4,477</td>
<td>20.2</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>$125,000</td>
<td>27</td>
<td>2,781</td>
<td>213</td>
<td>3,022</td>
<td>67.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>NETL-Pittsburgh</td>
<td>11,421</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>1,545</td>
<td>9,876</td>
<td>18.8</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>$125,000</td>
<td>109</td>
<td>4,635</td>
<td>330</td>
<td>5,074</td>
<td>51.4</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td rowspan="4">Office of Science</td>
<td>Brookhaven</td>
<td>157,280</td>
<td>19,766</td>
<td>8,335</td>
<td>129,179</td>
<td>17.5</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>44</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>38</td>
<td>$480,000</td>
<td>3,570</td>
<td>22,106</td>
<td>3,488</td>
<td>29,164</td>
<td>22.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Fermilab</td>
<td>144,851</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>144,851</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>133</td>
<td>97</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>$50,000</td>
<td>6,477</td>
<td>71,700</td>
<td>2,897</td>
<td>81,074</td>
<td>56.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Lawrence Berkeley</td>
<td>111,682</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>1,098</td>
<td>110,584</td>
<td>21.2</td>
<td>191</td>
<td>95</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>$145,000</td>
<td>7,818</td>
<td>43,783</td>
<td>3,485</td>
<td>55,086</td>
<td>49.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Oak Ridge*</td>
<td>667,132</td>
<td>246,839</td>
<td>-**</td>
<td>420,293</td>
<td>17.3</td>
<td>1,741</td>
<td>436</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>216***</td>
<td>$50,000</td>
<td>31,811</td>
<td>15,008</td>
<td>42,583</td>
<td>89,401</td>
<td>21.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="2">Total from targeted fleets</td>
<td>7,291,083</td>
<td>1,087,099</td>
<td>452,156</td>
<td>5,751,828</td>
<td>16.7</td>
<td>8,646</td>
<td>3,988</td>
<td>1,235</td>
<td>772</td>
<td>$2,745,000</td>
<td>473,745</td>
<td>1,222,511</td>
<td>276,155</td>
<td>1,972,411</td>
<td>34.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2">Totals from non-targeted fleets</td>
<td>82,175</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>82,175</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>822</td>
<td>822</td>
<td>1.0</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="17"></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td colspan="2">Total DOE Fleetwide</td>
<td>7,373,258</td>
<td>1,087,099</td>
<td>452,146</td>
<td><strong>5,834,002</strong></td>
<td>16.83</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>-</td>
<td>$2,745,000</td>
<td>473,745</td>
<td>1,222,511</td>
<td>276,977</td>
<td><strong>1,973,233</strong></td>
<td><strong>33.8</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td colspan="5"><strong>Required 20% Fuel Use Reduction</strong></td>
<td><strong>1,166,800</strong></td>
<td colspan="11"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

\* In addition to the Office of Science LPSO, some Oak Ridge National
Laboratory operations fall under the Defense Programs and Environmental
Management LPSOs.

\*\* Exempt fuel use included under non-road fuel use

\*\*\* Exempt vehicles include non-road vehicles

**Attachments**

**Individual DOE Fleet Location Analyses**

**BPA-WILLAMETTE**

**[FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 32,074 32,074 0 0 32,074]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 140,821 161,522 161,522]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 193,596 - - 193,596 38,719]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 400 55 34 153 36 6 139 32 2]{.underline}**

**[MDV 464 464 464]{.underline}**

**[HDV 176 176 176]{.underline}**

**[AFV 41]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 200 200 0 Assumed all LDV gasoline; all M/HDV
diesel]{.underline}**

**[MDV 464 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 176 0]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford MINICOMPACT 0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford SUBCOMPACT 0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[COMPACT 20.3 28.5 23 0]{.underline}**

**[MIDSIZE 1 19.7 29 23 0.043436023]{.underline}**

**[LARGE 18 25 21 0]{.underline}**

**[TWO-SEATER 0 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL P/U 4 16.1 20.2 18 0.225754874]{.underline}**

**[LARGE P/U 12 14.3 19.1 16 0.744260975]{.underline}**

**[SMALL VAN 1 15.5 20.7 17 0.057223001]{.underline}**

**[LARGE VAN 3 14.2 19.1 16 0.186877811]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.7]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.7]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.7]{.underline}**

**[\* Average fuel economy values estimated by category based on FY 1999
New GSA Leased Vehicles for DOE fleet and fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Willamette has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY 2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[140,821 143,567 29,172 29,172 29,172 29,172 29,172
29,172]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = ???]{.underline}**

> **[- Willamette not in MSA - Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as
> FY2001 - Afv acquisition rates assumed 75% for FY2001 thru Fy2005 -
> All acquisitions assumed to be LDV - LDV turnover assumed to be five
> years - Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (50% CNG; 50% E85) - Avg
> annual LDV fuel use = 32074/200 = 160 GGE - Bi-fuel assumed to use CNG
> 75% of time; FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 36 6 32 24 32 24 32 24 32 24 32 24]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Use AFV Refueling Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 in FY 2005
(GGE) Infra FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 60 7200 250000]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 60 7200 32500]{.underline}**

**[Total 120 14400 2880 5760 8640 11520 14400]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 2672 mi/yr based on 160
gal/yr and avg 16.7 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 8 8 8 8 8]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 155 151 143 139 136]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 1243 1208 1143 1113 1085]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 893 928 993 1023 1051]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 893 1821 2814 3837 4888]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 4888 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[193,596 3,872 774.38 1,548.77 2,323.15 3,097.53
3,871.91]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR BPA-WILLAMETTE
STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[Element (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 29,172]{.underline}**

**[2 14400]{.underline}**

**[3 4888]{.underline}**

**[4 3,872]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 52,331]{.underline}**

**BROOKHAVEN LAB**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 137,514 137,514 8335 8335 129,179]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 17,233 19,766 17,233 19,766 -]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 157,280 19,766 8,335 129,179 25,836]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 244 21 9 240 20 5 238 9 9]{.underline}**

**[MDV 41]{.underline}**

**[HDV 3]{.underline}**

**[EXEMPT 38]{.underline}**

**[AFV 9]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS)]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford MINICOMPACT 0 26 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford SUBCOMPACT 0 33 0]{.underline}**

**[COMPACT 20.3 28.5 23 0]{.underline}**

**[MIDSIZE 19.7 29 23 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE 2 18 25 21 0.097111111]{.underline}**

**[TWO-SEATER 0 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL P/U 6 16.1 20.2 18 0.33863231]{.underline}**

**[LARGE P/U 14.3 19.1 16 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL VAN 15.5 20.7 17 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE VAN 4 14.2 19.1 16 0.249170415]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 17.5]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 18.5]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 20.5]{.underline}**

**[\* Average fuel economy values estimated by category based on FY 1999
New GSA Leased Vehicles for DOE fleet]{.underline}**

**[and fleet fuel economy guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Brookhaven has MDV & HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[17,233 17,569 3,570 3,570 3,570 3,570 3,570 3,570]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = LPG (private)]{.underline}**

**[- Brookhaven is in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2000; AFV acquisition
at 75% per EPACT]{.underline}**

**[- All acquisitions assumed to be LDV]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (50% CNG; 50% E85) and
interview with fleet mgr]{.underline}**

**[- Assume MD/HDV 7.0 mpg avg and 6566 mi/yr avg (DOE Databook for
Federal fleets)]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average annual LDV mileage of 5,500 mi/yr based on FY00 FAST
data; avg fuel economy of 14 mpg based on fleet derived
estimate]{.underline}**

**[- Avg annual LDV fuel use = 5,500/14 = 393 GGE]{.underline}**

**[- Bi-fuel assumed to use CNG 75% of time; FFVs assumed 75% E85
use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 20 5 20 15 20 15 20 15 20 15 20 15]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 Total AF Fuel Use (GGE) in FY2005
Cost (\$) FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 75 22106 480000 Quote from Fleet Manager E85 FFV 0 0
0]{.underline}**

**[Total 75 22106 480000 4421 8842 13264 17685 22106]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 2000 travels 5,500 mi/yr with avg 17.5
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 5 5 5 5 5]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 382 371 352 344 335]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 1908 1857 1762 1718 1676]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 57 108 203247289]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 57 165 368 615 904]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 904 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[129,179 2,584 516.72 1,033.43 1,550.15 2,066.86
2,583.58]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR BROOKHAVEN STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 3,570]{.underline}**

**[2 22106]{.underline}**

**[3 904]{.underline}**

**[4 2,584]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 29164]{.underline}**

**Fermilab**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 108,989 108,989 0 0 108,989]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 31,266 35,862 35,862]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 144,851 - - 144,851 28,970]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 133 9 9 125 24 24 125 26 26]{.underline}**

**[MDV 81 81 9 9 81 9 9]{.underline}**

**[HDV 16 16 16]{.underline}**

**[AFV 19]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 114 1 0]{.underline}**

**[MDV 0 81]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 16]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford MINICOMPACT 0 26 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford SUBCOMPACT 0 33 0]{.underline}**

**[COMPACT 0 20.3 28.5 23 0]{.underline}**

**[MIDSIZE 0 19.7 29 23 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE 0 18 25 21 0]{.underline}**

**[TWO-SEATER 0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL P/U 0 16.1 20.2 18 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE P/U 0 14.3 19.1 16 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL VAN 0 15.5 20.7 17 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE VAN 0 14.2 19.1 16 0]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE -]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[\* Average fuel economy values estimated by category based on FY 1999
New GSA Leased Vehicles for DOE fleet]{.underline}**

**[and fleet fuel economy guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- FERMI has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[31,266 31,876 6,477 6,477 6,477 6,477 6,477 6,477]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG on-site; LPG
(private)]{.underline}**

**[- FERMI is in MSA - Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001;
AFV acquisition at 75% EPACT]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Mix of AFV (100% E85); fleet stated do not want to use on-site CNG
station; E85 in Illinois]{.underline}**

**[- Avg annual LDV fuel use = 108989/(133-19) = 956 GGE]{.underline}**

**[- FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 24 24 26 20 26 20 26 20 26 20 26 20]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

> **[Total AF Fuel Use AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 in FY 2005 (GGE) (\$) FY01 FY02 FY03
FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 100 71700 50000]{.underline}**

**[Total 100 71700 14340 28680 43020 57360 71700]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Baseline FE is zero since did not buy any non-AFV LDVs in
\'1999\']{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 6 6 6 6 6]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[New gal used #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cumul]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 0 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[144,851 2,897 579.40 1,158.81 1,738.21 2,317.62
2,897.02]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR FERMI STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 6,477]{.underline}**

**[2 71700]{.underline}**

**[3 0]{.underline}**

**[4 2,897]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 81,074]{.underline}**

**IDAHO NAT\'L LAB**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 397,889 397,889 39558 39558 358,331]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 579,235 664,383 664,383]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 1,062,272 - 39,558 1,022,714 204,543]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 698 61 47 698 41 25 700 35 20]{.underline}**

**[MDV 15 15 15]{.underline}**

**[HDV 249 1 249 249]{.underline}**

**[AFV 125]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 573 3 57]{.underline}**

**[MDV 15 (assumed all diesel)]{.underline}**

**[HDV 249 (assumed all diesel)]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford MINICOMPACT 0 26 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford SUBCOMPACT 0 33 0]{.underline}**

**[COMPACT 20.3 28.5 23 0]{.underline}**

**[MIDSIZE 19.7 29 23 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE 18 25 21 0]{.underline}**

**[TWO-SEATER 0 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL P/U 16.1 20.2 18 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE P/U 8 14.3 19.1 16 0.496173983]{.underline}**

**[SMALL VAN 3 15.5 20.7 17 0.171669004]{.underline}**

**[LARGE VAN 1 14.2 19.1 16 0.062292604]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.4]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.4]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.4]{.underline}**

**[\* Average fuel economy values estimated by category based on FY 1999
New GSA Leased Vehicles for DOE fleet]{.underline}**

**[and fleet fuel economy guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Idaho has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (Gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[579,235 590,532 119,991 119,991 119,991 119,991 119,991
119,991]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (govt, private), LPG,
Electric]{.underline}**

**[- Idaho not in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rate assumed same as FY2001]{.underline}**

**[AFV acquisition rate assumed 75% - All acquisitions assumed to be
LDV - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Mix of AFVs purchased in
FY99 (90% Bi-Fuel CNG; 10% E85) - Avg annual LDV fuel use =
397889/(698-125) = 694 GGE - Bi-fuel assumed to use CNG 75% of time;
FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 41 25 35 26 35 26 35 26 35 26 35 26]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Fuel Use AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 in FY 2005 (GGE) (\$) FY01 FY02 FY03
FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 130 67665 0 Existing LCNG station can handle E85 FFV 0
0]{.underline}**

**[Total 130 67665 13533 27066 40599 54132 67665]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase - FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase - FY03 = 2.0 mpg
increase - FY04 =2.5 mpg increase - FY05 = 3.0 mpg
increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new
LDV in 1999 travels 11413 mi/yr based on 694 gal/yr and avg 16.4
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 9 9 9 9 9]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 674 655 619 603 587]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 6065 5891 5572 5425 5285]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 181 355 674 821 961]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 181 535 1210 2031 2992]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 2992 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1,022,714 20,454 4,090.85 8,181.71 12,272.56 16,363.42
20,454.27]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR IDAHO STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 119,991]{.underline}**

**[2 67665]{.underline}**

**[3 2992]{.underline}**

**[4 20,454]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 211,102]{.underline}**

**LAWRENCE BERKLEY NAT\'L LAB**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 68,393 68,393 1098 1098 67,295]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 37,741 43,289 43,289]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 111,682 - 1,098 110,584 22,117]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 191 46 2 194 44 22 194 38 20]{.underline}**

**[MDV 56 4 0 56 2 0 56 6 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 39 0 0 39 1 0 39 2 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 4]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 187 0 3]{.underline}**

**[MDV 0 56]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 39]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Astro 1 16 18 17 0.059375]{.underline}**

**[Astro 3 16 19 17 0.174177632]{.underline}**

**[Breeze 26 20 28 23 1.132857143]{.underline}**

**[Cargo van 4 15 21 17 0.232380952]{.underline}**

**[Contour 2 22 31 25 0.079032258]{.underline}**

**[Ram 1500 1 16 21 18 0.055803571]{.underline}**

**[Windstar 1 15 23 18 0.056231884]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 21.23]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 22.23]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 24.23]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Law Berk has MDV & HDV fleet - Assume diesel use remains constant
through FY2005 - Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY 2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (Gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[37,741 38,477 7,818 7,818 7,818 7,818 7,818 7,818]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (gov\'t), LPG (private,
public) - Lawrence Berk in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001; AFV acquisition =
75% EPACT - All acquisitions assumed to be LDV - LDV turnover assumed to
be five years - Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (33% Bi-Fuel CNG;
33% E85; 33% EV) - Avg annual LDV fuel use = 68393/187 = 366 GGE -
Bi-fuel assumed to use CNG 75% of time; FFVs assumed 75% E85
use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 44 22 38 29 38 29 38 29 38 29 38 29]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Fuel Use AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 in FY 2005 (GGE) (\$) FY01 FY02 FY03
FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 48 13135 0]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 48 13135 32500]{.underline}**

**[EV 48 17513 112,000]{.underline}**

**[Total 96 43783 8756.55 17513.1 26269.65 35026.2 43783]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new
LDV in 1999 travels 7765 mi/yr based on 366 gal/yr and avg 21.2
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 9 9 9 9 9]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 357 349 334 327 320]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 3216 3144 3008 2945 2884]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 78 150 286 349 410]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 78 228 514 863 1273]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 1273 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[110,584 2,212 442.34 884.67 1,327.01 1,769.34 2,211.68]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR LAWRENCE BERK
STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 7,818]{.underline}**

**[2 43783]{.underline}**

**[3 1273]{.underline}**

**[4 2,212]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 55,086]{.underline}**

**LAWRENCE LIV NAT\'L LAB**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 441,113 441,113 - 39574 39574 401,539]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 56,865 65,224 - 3,930 4,508 60,716]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 506,337 - 44,082 462,255 92,451]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 808 98 83 592 118 96 592 110 48]{.underline}**

**[MDV 51 7 51 51]{.underline}**

**[HDV 54 54 54]{.underline}**

**[AFV 121]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 808 0 21]{.underline}**

**[MDV 51 2]{.underline}**

**[HDV 54 7]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford astro 4 16 19 17 0.232236842]{.underline}**

**[breeze 6 20 28 23 0.261428571]{.underline}**

**[crown vic 2 18 25 21 0.097111111]{.underline}**

**[D1500 1 17 22 19 0.052807487]{.underline}**

**[Durango 2 15 20 17 0.118333333]{.underline}**

**[F250 9 13 18 15 0.605769231]{.underline}**

**[Lumina 2 20 30 24 0.085]{.underline}**

**[Ram 1500 1 16 21 18 0.055803571]{.underline}**

**[Ranger 1 18 23 20 0.050120773]{.underline}**

**[Tahoe 4 15 19 17 0.241403509]{.underline}**

**[Taurus 1 19 27 22 0.045614035]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 17.9]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 18.9]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 20.9]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[56,865 57,974 11,780 5,890 11,780 20,615 20,615]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (gov\'t), LPG (private,
public)]{.underline}**

**[- Lawrence in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001; AFV acquisition =
75% EPACT - All acquisitions assumed to be LDV - LDV turnover assumed to
be five years - Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (90% Bi-Fuel CNG;
10% E85) - Avg annual LDV fuel use = 441113/(808+21) = 532 GGE - Bi-fuel
assumed to use CNG 75% of time; FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 118 96 110 83 110 83 110 83 110 83 110 83]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Use AFV Refueling]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 (GGE) in FY05 Infra (\$) FY01 FY02
FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 374 149027 \$850,000 Quote from Fleet Mgr; but funded
under AFV User]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 42 16559 \$50,000 Estimated]{.underline}**

**[Total 415 165585 \$900,000 33117 66234 99351 132468
165585]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase - FY04 =2.5 mpg increase - FY05 = 3.0 mpg
increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new
LDV in 1999 travels 9,514 mi/yr based on 532 gal/yr and avg 17.9
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 27 27 27 27 27]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 518 504 479 467 456]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 13976 13606 12921 12604 12303]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 388 758 1443 1760 2061]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 388 1146 2589 4349 6410]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 6410 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[462,255 9,245 1,849.02 3,698.04 5,547.07 7,396.09
9,245.11]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR LAWRENCE LIV
STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 11,780]{.underline}**

**[2 165585]{.underline}**

**[3 6410]{.underline}**

**[4 9,245]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 193,020]{.underline}**

**LOS ALAMOS NAT\'L LAB**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 529,205 529,205 209803 209803 319,402]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 158,709 182,039 59,780 68,568 113,472]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 711,244 - 278,371 432,874 86,575]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 591 122 83 833 75 62 833 75 62]{.underline}**

**[MDV 468 47 0 530 60 0 530 60 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 101 2 0 115 5 0 115 5 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 244]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 591 0 263]{.underline}**

**[MDV 438 30]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 101]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[1500 Cargo 1 13 18 15 0.067307692]{.underline}**

**[astro 3 16 19 17 0.174177632]{.underline}**

**[breeze 3 20 28 23 0.130714286]{.underline}**

**[cherokee 14 16 20 18 0.79625]{.underline}**

**[D150 1 14 19 16 0.062969925]{.underline}**

**[Dakota 3 15 20 17 0.1775]{.underline}**

**[Durango 45 15 20 17 2.6625]{.underline}**

**[Expedition 11 11 20 14 0.7975]{.underline}**

**[F250 7 13 18 15 0.471153846]{.underline}**

**[S10 3 17 21 19 0.161344538]{.underline}**

**[Tahoe 13 15 19 17 0.784561404]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.5]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.5]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.5]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- LANL has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[Fy2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[158,709 161,804 32,877 32,877 32,877 32,877 32,877
32,877]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (on-site), Electric
(onsite); LPG (private, utility)]{.underline}**

**[- LANL in MSA and Albuquerque is AFV User City]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001; AFV acquisition =
75% EPACT]{.underline}**

**[- All acquisitions assumed to be LDV]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (100% E85)]{.underline}**

**[- Avg annual LDV fuel use = 310 GGE based on fleet ops
data]{.underline}**

**[- FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 75 62 75 62 75 62 75 62 75 62 75 62]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Use AFV Refueling]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 (GGE) in FY05 Infra (\$) FY01 FY02
FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 310 72075 50000]{.underline}**

**[Total 310 72075 14415 28830 43245 57660 72075]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new LDV in
1999 travels 5115 mi/yr based on 310 gal/yr and avg 16.5
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 13 13 13 13 13]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 300 292 276 269 262]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 3901 3790 3586 3492 3402]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 129 240 444 538 628]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 129 369 813 1352 1979]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 1979 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[432,874 8,657 1,731.49 3,462.99 5,194.48 6,925.98
8,657.47]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR LOS ALAMOS STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 32,877]{.underline}**

**[2 72075]{.underline}**

**[3 1979]{.underline}**

**[4 8,657]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 115,589]{.underline}**

**NETL MORGANTOWN**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[. GASOL 4,635 4,635 309 309 4,326]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 132 151 - - 151]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 4,786 - 309 4,477 895]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 15 16 7 3 16 7 3]{.underline}**

**[MDV 4 4 1 0 4 1 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 1 1 0 0 1 0 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 4]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 11 0 1 (Per vehicle fuel consumption assumed same as NETL-Pitt =
309 Gas; 132 diesel)]{.underline}**

**[MDV 4 0 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 1]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - FAST Vehicle Data
(2000)]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Van 1 13 18 15 0.067307692]{.underline}**

**[0 16 19 17 0]{.underline}**

**[Compact Sedan 3 20 28 23 0.130714286]{.underline}**

**[0 16 20 18 0]{.underline}**

**[0 14 19 16 0]{.underline}**

**[0 15 20 17 0]{.underline}**

**[0 15 20 17 0]{.underline}**

**[0 11 20 14 0]{.underline}**

**[0 13 18 15 0]{.underline}**

**[0 17 21 19 0]{.underline}**

**[0 15 19 17 0]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 20.2]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 21.2]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 23.2]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- NETL PITT has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[Fy2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[132 135 27 27 27 27 27 27]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (on-site slow
fill)]{.underline}**

**[- Vehicle acquisition rates assumed to be 5/yr; AFV acquisition = 75%
EPACT]{.underline}**

**[- All acquisitions assumed to be LDV]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be three years - Mix of AFVs based on 1999
purchased (100% CNG per fleet mgr) - Avg annual LDV fuel use = 309 GGE
based on FAST input for NETL-Pitt DOE-owned vehicles in FY2000 - FFVs
assumed 75% CNG use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Use AFV Refueling]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 (GGE) in FY05 Infra (\$) FY01 FY02
FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG 12 2781 125000]{.underline}**

**[Total 12 2781 556.2 1112.4 1668.6 2224.8 2781]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 6242 mi/yr based on 309
gal/yr and avg 20.2 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 1 1 1 1 1]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 302 294 281 275 269]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 302 294 281 275 269]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 7 15 28 34 40]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 7 22 50 84 124]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 124 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[4,477 90 18 36 54 72 90]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR LOS ALAMOS STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 27]{.underline}**

**[2 2781]{.underline}**

**[3 124]{.underline}**

**[4 90]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 3,022]{.underline}**

**NETL PITTSBURGH**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 10,815 10,815 1,545 1545 9,270]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 528 606 - - 606]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 11,421 - 1,545 9,876 1,975]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 42 39 5 2 39 5 2]{.underline}**

**[MDV 7 5 1 0 5 1 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 4 5 0 0 5 0 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 14]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 28 0 4]{.underline}**

**[MDV 7 0 1]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 4]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - FAST Vehicle Data
(2000)]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[0 13 18 15 0]{.underline}**

**[0 16 19 17 0]{.underline}**

**[Compact Sedan 2 20 28 23 0.087142857]{.underline}**

**[0 16 20 18 0]{.underline}**

**[0 14 19 16 0]{.underline}**

**[0 15 20 17 0]{.underline}**

**[0 15 20 17 0]{.underline}**

**[SUV 1 11 20 14 0.0725]{.underline}**

**[0 13 18 15 0]{.underline}**

**[0 17 21 19 0]{.underline}**

**[0 15 19 17 0]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 18.8]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 19.8]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 21.8]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- NETL PITT has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[Fy2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[528 538 109 109 109 109 109 109]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (on-site slow
fill)]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001; AFV acquisition =
75% EPACT - All acquisitions assumed to be LDV]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Mix of AFVs based on 1999
purchased (100% CNG per fleet mgr) - Avg annual LDV fuel use = 309 GGE
based on FAST input for DOE-owned vehicles in FY2000 - FFVs assumed 75%
CNG use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Use AFV Refueling]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 (GGE) in FY05 Infra (\$) FY01 FY02
FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG 20 4635 125000]{.underline}**

**[Total 20 4635 927 1854 2781 3708 4635]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 5807 mi/yr based on 309
gal/yr and avg 18.8 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 1 1 1 1 1]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 301 293 279 273 266]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 301 293 279 273 266]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 8 16 30 36 43]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 8 24 53 90 132]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 132 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[9,876 198 40 79 119 158 198]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR LOS ALAMOS STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 109]{.underline}**

**[2 4635]{.underline}**

**[3 132]{.underline}**

**[4 198]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 5,074]{.underline}**

**NEVADA TEST SITE**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE - Fleet Sources]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 1,127,100 1,127,100 12348 12348 1,114,752]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 507,280 581,850 355,096 407,295 - 174,555]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 1,708,950 407,295 12,348 1,289,307 257,861]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 1040 100 20 981 232 91 880 100 20]{.underline}**

**[MDV 170 0 0 169 0 0 0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 257 0 0 256 1 0 200 0 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 111]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 657 0 9]{.underline}**

**[MDV 105 2]{.underline}**

**[HDV 48 210]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Plymouth Breeze 5 20 28 23 0.217857143]{.underline}**

**[Dodge Caravan 1 16 20 18 0.056875]{.underline}**

**[Jeep Cherokee 26 16 20 18 1.47875]{.underline}**

**[Ford Contour 1 22 31 25 0.039516129]{.underline}**

**[Dodge Dakota 3 16 21 18 0.167410714]{.underline}**

**[Dodge Dakota 8 14 18 16 0.514285714]{.underline}**

**[Ford E150 2 14 17 15 0.131512605]{.underline}**

**[Ford Expedition 10 11 20 14 0.725]{.underline}**

**[Ford F250 4 13 18 15 0.269230769]{.underline}**

**[Dodge Ram 1500 5 16 21 18 0.279017857]{.underline}**

**[Ford Ranger 1 18 23 20 0.050120773]{.underline}**

**[Chevy Tahoe 4 15 19 17 0.241403509]{.underline}**

**[Ford Windstar 3 15 23 18 0.168695652]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.82]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.82]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.82]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[507,280 517,173 105,085 105,085 105,085 105,085 105,085
105,085]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

> **[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (onsite) - Nevada Test
> Site is in the Las Vegas MSA according to the 1995
> Census]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001 - AFV acquisition
rates assumed to be 75% for FY 2001 thru Fy 2005 - LDV turnover assumed
to be five years - Mix of AFVs (80% CNG; 20% E85) - According to fleet
sources, 80% of gasoline is consumed by LDV - Avg annual LDV fuel use =
(1,127,100\*0.8)/657 = 1372 GGE - Bi-fuel assumed to use CNG 75% of
time; FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 232 91 100 75 100 75 100 75 100 75 100 75]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF Use AFV Refueling]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 in FY 2005 (GGE) Infra FY01 FY02 FY03
FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 300 308700 479660 Existing CNG station serves 100 AFVs;
still need more CNG for extra 300 veh]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 75 77175 50000]{.underline}**

**[Total 375 385875 77175 154350 231525 308700 385875]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 23086 mi/yr based on 1372
gal/yr and avg 16.82 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 25 25 25 25 25]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 1333 1295 1227 1195 1165]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 33320 32385 30664 29871 29117]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 980 1915 3636 4429 5183]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 980 2895 6531 10960 16143]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 16143 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1,289,307 25,786 5,157.23 10,314.46 15,471.68 20,628.91
25,786.14]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR NEVADA TEST SITE
STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 105,085]{.underline}**

**[2 385875]{.underline}**

**[3 16143]{.underline}**

**[4 25,786]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 532889]{.underline}**

**NREL**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 16,100 16,100 1464 1464 14,636]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 720 826 826]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 16,926 - 1,464 15,462 3,092]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 36 9 8 36 6 5 37 9 9]{.underline}**

**[MDV 12 1]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Afv 14]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 22 2]{.underline}**

**[MDV 0 12 (assume all diesel)]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 0]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford MINICOMPACT 0 26 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford SUBCOMPACT 0 33 0]{.underline}**

**[COMPACT 0 20.3 28.5 23 0]{.underline}**

**[MIDSIZE 0 19.7 29 23 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE 0 18 25 21 0]{.underline}**

**[TWO-SEATER 0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL P/U 0 16.1 20.2 18 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE P/U 0 14.3 19.1 16 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL VAN 0 15.5 20.7 17 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE VAN 0 14.2 19.1 16 0]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE -]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[\* Average fuel economy values estimated by category based on FY 1999
New GSA Leased Vehicles for DOE fleet]{.underline}**

**[and fleet fuel economy guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- NREL has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[720 734 149 149 149 149 149 149]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (public); LPG (public);
E85 (public)]{.underline}**

**[- NREL is in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001; AFV acquisition
at 75% EPACT]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Mix of AFVs (50% CNG; 30% Electric; 20% E85) based on Fy 1999
purchased]{.underline}**

**[- Avg annual LDV fuel use = 16100/22 = 732 GGE]{.underline}**

**[- CNG Bi-Fuel and FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 6 5 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 7]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 Total AF Fuel Use (GGE) in FY2005
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG Bi-Fuel 18 9608]{.underline}**

**[Electric 11 7686]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 7 3843]{.underline}**

**[Total 25 13451 2690.1 5380.2 8070.3 10760.4 13451]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 6751 mi/yr based on 348
gal/yr and avg 19.4 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 2 2 2 2 2]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[New gal used #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
#VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 0 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[15,462 309 61.85 123.69 185.54 247.39 309.24]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR FERMI STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 149]{.underline}**

**[2 13451]{.underline}**

**[3 0]{.underline}**

**[4 309]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 13,909]{.underline}**

**OAK RIDGE NAT\'L LAB**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 495,145 192,534 0 302,611]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 171,987 54,305 117,682]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 667,132 246,839 - 420,293 84,059]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 1741 39 17 1569 19 13 1514 30 12]{.underline}**

**[MDV 220]{.underline}**

**[HDV 216]{.underline}**

**[AFV 14]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 1741 0 187]{.underline}**

**[MDV 220 7 (assume all diesel)]{.underline}**

**[HDV 216 22 (assume all diesel)]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[Ford MINICOMPACT 0 26 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford SUBCOMPACT 0 33 0]{.underline}**

**[COMPACT 3 20.3 28.5 23 0.128649209]{.underline}**

**[MIDSIZE 19.7 29 23 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE 18 25 21 0]{.underline}**

**[TWO-SEATER 0 0]{.underline}**

**[SMALL P/U 6 16.1 20.2 18 0.33863231]{.underline}**

**[LARGE P/U 13 14.3 19.1 16 0.806282723]{.underline}**

**[SMALL VAN 15.5 20.7 17 0]{.underline}**

**[LARGE VAN 14.2 19.1 16 0]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 17.3]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 18.3]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 20.3]{.underline}**

**[\* Average fuel economy values estimated by category based on FY 1999
New GSA Leased Vehicles for DOE fleet]{.underline}**

**[and fleet fuel economy guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[153,560 156,555 31,811 31,811 31,811 31,811 31,811
31,811]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 20 miles) = CNG (govt), LPG
(private)]{.underline}**

**[- Oak Ridge in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001; AFV acquisition =
75% EPACT]{.underline}**

**[- All acquisitions assumed to be LDV]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (100% E85)]{.underline}**

**[- Avg annual LDV fuel use = 302611/1741 = 174 GGE]{.underline}**

**[- FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 19 13 30 23 30 23 30 23 30 23 30 23]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Total AF AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 Fuel Use (GGE) in FY 2005 (\$) FY01
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 115 15008 35000]{.underline}**

**[Total 115 15008 3001.5 6003 9004.5 12006 15008]{.underline}**

**[AFV Refueling]{.underline}**

**[Infra \$]{.underline}**

**[Biodiesel 0]{.underline}**

**[E85 255000 (Two sites)]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 3010 mi/yr based on 174
gal/yr and avg 17.3 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 7 7 7 7 7]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 169 165 156 152 148]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 1185 1153 1093 1066 1039]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 33 65 125 152 179]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 33 98 222 375 554]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 554 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 10% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[420,293 42,029 8,405.86 16,811.72 25,217.58 33,623.44
42,029.30]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR OAK RIDGE STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 31,811]{.underline}**

**[2 15008]{.underline}**

**[3 554]{.underline}**

**[4 42,029]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 89,401]{.underline}**

**PANTEX**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 209,716 209,716 0 0 209,716]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 97,344 111,654 111,654]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 321,370 77,128 - 244,242 48,848]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 271 50 50 287 38 12 294 35 35]{.underline}**

**[MDV 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 16 5 0 16 0 0 16 0 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 63]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 208 3 0]{.underline}**

**[MDV 0 7]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 16]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[1500 1 5 13 18 15 0.336538462]{.underline}**

**[1500 1 14 18 16 0]{.underline}**

**[Countour 5 1 22 31 25 0.039516129]{.underline}**

**[Crown Vic 1 18 25 21 0]{.underline}**

**[Ram 1500 3 11 16 21 18 0.613839286]{.underline}**

**[Tahoe 29 19 15 19 17 1.146666667]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.8]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.8]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.8]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Pantex has HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[Fy2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[97,344 99,243 20,165 20,165 20,165 20,165 20,165
20,165]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (onsite); biodiesel
(onsite)]{.underline}**

**[- Pantex not in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001 Afv acquisition
rate assumed 75% - All acquisitions assumed to be LDV - LDV turnover
assumed to be five years - Problems with onsite CNG station; want to
phase it out - Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (100% E85) - Avg
annual LDV fuel use = 209716/208 = 1008 GGE - FFVs assumed 75% E85
use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 38 12 35 26 35 26 35 26 35 26 35 26]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005Total AF Fuel Use (GGE) in FY2005 (\$)
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 130 98280 50000]{.underline}**

**[Total 130 98280 19656 39312 58968 78624 98280]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase - FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase - FY04 =2.5 mpg
increase - FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new
LDV in 1999 travels 16934 mi/yr based on 1008 gal/yr and avg 16.8
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 9 9 9 9 9]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 976 949 898 875 853]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 8784 8538 8085 7876 7678]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 288 534 987 1196 1394]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 288 821 1808 3003 4397]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 4397 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[244,242 4,885 976.97 1,953.93 2,930.90 3,907.87
4,884.83]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR PANTEX STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 20,165]{.underline}**

**[2 98280]{.underline}**

**[3 4397]{.underline}**

**[4 4,885]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 127,727]{.underline}**

**RICHLAND-HANFORD**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 499,704 499,704 37873 37873 461,831]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 114,719 131,582 131,582]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 631,286 - 37,873 593,413 118,683]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 551 7 7 820 10 10 820 7 7]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV 823]{.underline}**

**[AFV 84]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT]{.underline}**

**[LDV 551 0 92]{.underline}**

**[MDV 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 663 160 Estimated]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[astro 1 15 19 17 0.060350877]{.underline}**

**[cherokee 7 16 20 18 0.398125]{.underline}**

**[durango 2 15 20 17 0.118333333]{.underline}**

**[F250 8 13 18 15 0.538461538]{.underline}**

**[S10 1 17 21 19 0.053781513]{.underline}**

**[Tahoe 12 15 19 17 0.724210526]{.underline}**

**[Windstar 1 15 23 18 0.056231884]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.4]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.4]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.4]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Richland has MDV & HDV fleet]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[Fy2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[117,484 119,775 24,337 24,337 24,337 24,337 24,337
24,337]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = LPG (private)]{.underline}**

**[- Richland not in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition assumed same as FY2001 - Afv acquisition
assumed 75% - All acquisitions assumed to be LDV - LDV turnover assumed
to be five years - Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (100% E85) - Avg
annual LDV fuel use = 502801/(551+663) = 414 GGE - FFVs assumed 75% E85
use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 7 7 10 8 10 8 10 8 10 8 10 8]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[Afv Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005Total AF Fuel Use (GGE) in FY2005 (\$)
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 40 12420 35000]{.underline}**

**[Total 40 12420 2484 4968 7452 9936 12420]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase - FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase - FY04 =2.5 mpg
increase - FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new
LDV in 1999 travels 6790 mi/yr based on 414 gal/yr and avg 16.4
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 2 2 2 2 2]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 401 390 369 359 350]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 803 780 737 718 699]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 25 48 91 110 129]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 25 73 164 274 402]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 402 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall 15 percent reduction in covered fleet
GGE]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 15% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[593,413 89,011.94 17,802.39 35,604.77 53,407.16 71,209.55
89,011.94]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR RICHLAND-HANFORD
STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 24,337]{.underline}**

**[2 12420]{.underline}**

**[3 402]{.underline}**

**[4 89,012]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 126,172]{.underline}**

**SNL-KIRTLAND**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE TOTAL GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 266,912 18,000 18,000 248,912]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 55,003 63,088 63,088]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 330,000 - 18,000 312,000 62,400]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -VIDS]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 413 52 11 414 124 68 414 43 7]{.underline}**

**[MDV 320 31 320 26 320]{.underline}**

**[HDV 30 14 30 4 30]{.underline}**

**[AFV 84]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT VIDS-Gasol]{.underline}**

**[LDV 386 27 24 0.935368043]{.underline}**

**[MDV 320 (assume all diesel)]{.underline}**

**[HDV 0 30]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[1500 1 13 18 15 0.067307692]{.underline}**

**[1500 2 14 18 16 0.128571429]{.underline}**

**[cherokee 2 16 20 18 0.11375]{.underline}**

**[Contour 2 20 28 23 0.087142857]{.underline}**

**[durango 2 15 20 17 0.118333333]{.underline}**

**[F250 5 13 18 15 0.336538462]{.underline}**

**[Ram 1500 2 16 21 18 0.111607143]{.underline}**

**[suburban 2 14 16 15 0.134821429]{.underline}**

**[tahoe 12 15 19 17 0.724210526]{.underline}**

**[Windstar 1 15 23 18 0.056231884]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.5]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.5]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.5]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[Fy2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[55,003 56,075 11,394 11,394 11,394 11,394 11,394
11,394]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = CNG (govt), LPG (private,
utility), E85 (public)]{.underline}**

**[- SNL in MSA and Albuquerque is AFV User City - Non-AFV acquisition
rates assumed same as FY2001 - AFV acquisition rates assumed 75% since
AFV User City with 50% incremental cost paid - All acquisitions assumed
to be LDV - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Mix of AFVs (50%
CNG; 50% E85) - Avg annual LDV fuel use = 228753/386 = 593 GGE - Bi-fuel
assumed to use CNG 75% of time; FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 124 68 43 32 43 32 43 32 43 32 43 32]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

**[AFV Infra]{.underline}**

**[Total AFVs in Service in FY2005Total AF Fuel Use (GGE) in FY2005 (\$)
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[CNG bi-fuel 80 35580 New CNG station already funded]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 80 35580 0]{.underline}**

**[Total 160 71160 14232 28464 42696 56928 71160]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase - FY04 =2.5 mpg increase - FY05 = 3.0 mpg
increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Assume average new LDV in 1999 travels 9780 mi/yr based on 593
gal/yr and avg 16.5 mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 11 11 11 11 11]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 575 559 529 515 501]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 6327 6147 5814 5661 5516]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 196 376 709 862 1007]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 196 572 1281 2142 3149]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 3149 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[312,000 6,240 1,248 2,496 3,744 4,992 6,240]{.underline}**

**[OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR SNL-KIRTLAND
STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 11,394]{.underline}**

**[2 71,160]{.underline}**

**[3 3,149]{.underline}**

**[4 6,240]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 91,943]{.underline}**

**SAVANNAH RIVER**

**[TOTAL FUEL USE]{.underline}**

**[1999 1999 NON-ROAD 1999 EXEMPT 2005 GOAL]{.underline}**

**[(GAL) GGE GAL GGE GAL GGE Covered GGE GGE REDUCT]{.underline}**

**[GASOL 330,000 330,000 9174 9174 320,826]{.underline}**

**[DIESEL 333,000 381,951 293,000 336,071 - 45,880]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 711,951 336,071 9,174 366,706 73,341]{.underline}**

**[FLEET DATA -Fleet data]{.underline}**

**[1999 2000 2001]{.underline}**

**[INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW TOTAL NEW AFV INVENTORY NEW
TOTAL NEW AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 1472 210 169 1472 151 114 1472 206 101]{.underline}**

**[MDV 48 0 96 0 93 0]{.underline}**

**[HDV 87 2 0 87 3 0 87 3 0]{.underline}**

**[AFV 284]{.underline}**

**[GASOL DIESEL EXEMPT Data]{.underline}**

**[LDV 1188 0 33 Inventory #\'s - from fleet]{.underline}**

**[MDV acquisition #\'s - from VIDS]{.underline}**

**[HDV 87]{.underline}**

**[FLEET FUEL ECONOMY (NEW ACQUISITIONS) - GSA Leased Vehicle
Data]{.underline}**

**[Vehicle Type 1999 Fuel Economy Info]{.underline}**

**[Make Model Cylinders Drive Acquisitions City FE Hwy FE Combined
FE]{.underline}**

**[0 0 0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[0 0 0]{.underline}**

**[Ford Windstar 4 15 23 18 0.224927536]{.underline}**

**[Jeep Cherokee 4 16 20 18 0.2275]{.underline}**

**[Ford F-250 9 13 18 15 0.605769231]{.underline}**

**[Dodge Dakota 4 16 21 18 0.223214286]{.underline}**

**[Dodge Ram 1500 8 16 21 18 0.446428571]{.underline}**

**[Chevy Suburban 16 14 16 15 1.078571429]{.underline}**

**[Baseline Average FE 16.03]{.underline}**

**[FY2002 FE Goal 17.03]{.underline}**

**[FY2005 FE Goal 19.03]{.underline}**

**[\* Fuel economy values from DOE fleet fuel economy
guide]{.underline}**

**[STRATEGY]{.underline}**

**[1. BIODIESEL USE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume diesel use remains constant through FY2005]{.underline}**

**[- Assume total conversion to B20 by FY2005]{.underline}**

**[FY 2005 FY2005 EQUIV FY2005 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Diesel (gal) B20 USE (gal) FUEL DISPL (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[333,000 339,494 68,982 68,982 68,982 68,982 68,982
68,982]{.underline}**

**[2. AFV ACQUISITIONS - VIDS]{.underline}**

**[- AFV Refueling access (\< 15 miles) = E85 (onsite); biodiesel
(onsite); LPG (private)]{.underline}**

**[- Savannah not in MSA]{.underline}**

**[- Non-AFV acquisition rates assumed same as FY2001]{.underline}**

**[- AFV aqusiition rate assumed to be 75% for FY 2001
-2005]{.underline}**

**[- All acquisitions assumed to be LDV]{.underline}**

**[- LDV turnover assumed to be five years]{.underline}**

**[- Mix of AFVs based on 1999 purchased (100% E85) and current use of
61,000 E85]{.underline}**

**[- Avg annual LDV fuel use = (330,000)/1188 = 278 GGE]{.underline}**

**[- FFVs assumed 75% E85 use]{.underline}**

**[2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005]{.underline}**

**[Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total AFV Total
AFV]{.underline}**

**[LDV 151 114 206 155 206 155 206 155 206 155 206 155]{.underline}**

**[MDV]{.underline}**

**[HDV]{.underline}**

> **[Total AF Fuel Use AFV Total AFVs in Service in FY2005 in FY 2005
> (GGE) Refueling Infra FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[E85 FFV 775 161588 None needed; use existing on-site]{.underline}**

**[Total 775 161588 32317.5 64635 96952.5 129270 161588]{.underline}**

**[3. Fuel Economy Increases]{.underline}**

**[- Require gradually increasing FE consistent with FY02 and FY05
goals]{.underline}**

**[- FY01 = 0.5 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY02 = 1.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY03 = 2.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- FY04 =2.5 mpg increase - FY05 = 3.0 mpg increase]{.underline}**

**[- Achieve increased FE through better selection of vehicle types, use
of hybrids - LDV turnover assumed to be five years - Assume average new
LDV in 1999 travels 4456 mi/yr based on 278 gal/yr and avg 16.03
mpg]{.underline}**

**[FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[New LDV 51 51 51 51 51]{.underline}**

**[gal/LDV 269 262 247 240 234]{.underline}**

**[New gal used 13744 13341 12601 12261 11939]{.underline}**

**[Gal saved in FY 434 837 1577 1917 2239]{.underline}**

**[Gal Saved Cum 434 1271 2848 4765 7004]{.underline}**

**[Total gal saved in FY05 = 7004 GGE]{.underline}**

**[4. Fleet Efficiency Improvements]{.underline}**

**[- Reduced vehicle trips]{.underline}**

**[- Increased vehicle loads]{.underline}**

**[- More use of higher FE]{.underline}**

**[- Assume overall two percent reduction in LDV fleet GGE from
baseline]{.underline}**

**[Covered Assumed 2% FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05]{.underline}**

**[Baseline GGE Savings (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[366,706 7,334 1,466.82 2,933.65 4,400.47 5,867.30
7,334.12]{.underline}**

**OVERALL PETROL FUEL REDUCTIONS FOR SAVANNAH STRATEGY**

**[STRATEGY FUEL SAVED]{.underline}**

**[OPTION (GGE)]{.underline}**

**[1 68,982]{.underline}**

**[2 161588]{.underline}**

**[3 7004]{.underline}**

**[4 7,334]{.underline}**

**[TOTAL 244,908]{.underline}**

[^1]: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Technology Utilization, *The
    Federal Fleet Strategy Development Supplement*, September 2000.

[^2]: *Executive Order 13149: Greening the Government through Federal
    Fleet and Transportation Efficiency, guidance Document for Federal
    Agencies*, prepared by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
    Technology Utilization, July 2000.