+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| **Monitoring   | **Status of APR Data/SPP       | **OSEP             |
| Priorities and | Revision Issues**              | Analysis/Next      |
| Indicators**   |                                | Steps**            |
+================+================================+====================+
| 1.  Percent of | The State revised the FFY 2004 | The State reported |
|     infants    | baseline data for this         | that noncompliance |
|     and        | indicator in its SPP and OSEP  | identified in FFY  |
|     toddlers   | accepts that revision.         | 2005 with the      |
|     with IFSPs |                                | timely service     |
|     who        | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | provision          |
|     receive    | data for this indicator are    | requirements in 34 |
|     the early  | 93.2%. These data represent    | CFR §§303.340(c),  |
|                | progress from the FFY 2005     | 303.342(e) and     |
|   intervention | data of 82.3%.                 | 303.344(f)(1) was  |
|     services   |                                | corrected in a     |
|     on their   | The State did not meet its FFY | timely manner.     |
|     IFSPs in a | 2006 target of 100%.           |                    |
|     timely     |                                | The State must     |
|     manner.    | The State reported that five   | review its         |
|                | of five findings of            | improvement        |
| \[Compliance   | noncompliance identified in    | activities and     |
| Indicator\]    | FFY 2005 related to this       | revise them, if    |
|                | indicator were corrected in a  | appropriate, to    |
|                | timely manner.                 | ensure they will   |
|                |                                | enable the State   |
|                |                                | to provide data in |
|                |                                | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
|                |                                | due February 1,    |
|                |                                | 2009,              |
|                |                                | demonstrating that |
|                |                                | the State is in    |
|                |                                | compliance with    |
|                |                                | the requirements   |
|                |                                | in 34 CFR          |
|                |                                | §§303.340(c),      |
|                |                                | 303.342(e) and     |
|                |                                | 303.344(f)(1),     |
|                |                                | including          |
|                |                                | reporting          |
|                |                                | correction of the  |
|                |                                | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in the  |
|                |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 2\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State's actual |
| infants and    | data for this indicator are    | target data for    |
| toddlers with  | 99.29%.                        | provision of       |
| IFSPs who      |                                | services to        |
| primarily      | The State's data reflect a     | infants and        |
| receive early  | high level of performance for  | toddlers in        |
| intervention   | this indicator.                | natural            |
| services in    |                                | environments are   |
| the home or    | The State met its FFY 2006     | at or greater than |
| programs for   | target of 99.20%.              | 95%. There is no   |
| typically      |                                | expectation that   |
| developing     |                                | an increase in     |
| children.      |                                | that percentage is |
|                |                                | necessary. OSEP    |
| \[Results      |                                | appreciates the    |
| Indicator\]    |                                | State's efforts to |
|                |                                | improve            |
|                |                                | performance and    |
|                |                                | expects that the   |
|                |                                | State is           |
|                |                                | monitoring to      |
|                |                                | ensure that IFSP   |
|                |                                | teams are making   |
|                |                                | service setting    |
|                |                                | decisions on an    |
|                |                                | individualized     |
|                |                                | basis and in       |
|                |                                | compliance with 34 |
|                |                                | CFR §§303.12,      |
|                |                                | 303.18, and        |
|                |                                | 303.344(d)(1)(ii). |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 3\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State reported |
| infants and    | progress data for this         | the required       |
| toddlers with  | indicator are:                 | progress data and  |
| IFSPs who      |                                | improvement        |
| demonstrate    | <table>                        | activities. The    |
| improved:      | <colgroup>                     | State must provide |
|                | <col style="width: 62%" />     | progress data with |
| A. Positive    | <col style="width: 12%" />     | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| so             | <col style="width: 13%" />     | due February 1,    |
| cial-emotional | <col style="width: 11%" />     | 2009, and baseline |
| skills         | </colgroup>                    | data and targets   |
| (including     | <thead>                        | with the FFY 2008  |
| social         | <tr class="header">            | APR, due February  |
| r              | <th>06-07 Infant and Toddler   | 1, 2010.           |
| elationships); | Outcome Progress Data</th>     |                    |
|                | <th><blockquote>               |                    |
| B. Acquisition | <p>Social</p>                  |                    |
| and use of     | <p>Emotional</p>               |                    |
| knowledge and  | </blockquote></th>             |                    |
| skills         | <th><blockquote>               |                    |
| (including     | <p>Knowledge</p>               |                    |
| early          | <p>&amp; Skills</p>            |                    |
| language/      | </blockquote></th>             |                    |
| c              | <th><blockquote>               |                    |
| ommunication); | <p>Appropriate Behavior</p>    |                    |
| and            | </blockquote></th>             |                    |
|                | </tr>                          |                    |
| C. Use of      | </thead>                       |                    |
| appropriate    | <tbody>                        |                    |
| behaviors to   | <tr class="odd">               |                    |
| meet their     | <td>a. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
| needs.         | toddlers who did not improve   |                    |
|                | functioning.</td>              |                    |
| \[Results      | <td>5%</td>                    |                    |
| Indicator\]    | <td>2%</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>0%</td>                    |                    |
|                | </tr>                          |                    |
|                | <tr class="even">              |                    |
|                | <td>b. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|                | toddlers who improved but      |                    |
|                | not sufficient to move         |                    |
|                | nearer to functioning          |                    |
|                | comparable to same-aged        |                    |
|                | peers.</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>6%</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>3%</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>2%</td>                    |                    |
|                | </tr>                          |                    |
|                | <tr class="odd">               |                    |
|                | <td>c. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|                | toddlers who improved to a     |                    |
|                | level nearer to same-aged      |                    |
|                | peers but did not reach        |                    |
|                | it.</td>                       |                    |
|                | <td>5%</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>25%</td>                   |                    |
|                | <td>19%</td>                   |                    |
|                | </tr>                          |                    |
|                | <tr class="even">              |                    |
|                | <td>d. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|                | toddlers who improved          |                    |
|                | functioning to reach a level   |                    |
|                | comparable to same-aged        |                    |
|                | peers.</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>3%</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>27%</td>                   |                    |
|                | <td>16%</td>                   |                    |
|                | </tr>                          |                    |
|                | <tr class="odd">               |                    |
|                | <td>e. % of infant &amp;       |                    |
|                | toddlers who maintained        |                    |
|                | functioning at a level         |                    |
|                | comparable to same-aged        |                    |
|                | peers.</td>                    |                    |
|                | <td>81%</td>                   |                    |
|                | <td>43%</td>                   |                    |
|                | <td>63%</td>                   |                    |
|                | </tr>                          |                    |
|                | </tbody>                       |                    |
|                | </table>                       |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
|                | The State provided improvement |                    |
|                | activities for this indicator  |                    |
|                | covering the remaining years   |                    |
|                | of the SPP.                    |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 4\. Percent of | The State's reported data for  | OSEP looks forward |
| families       | this indicator are:            | to the State's     |
| participating  |                                | data demonstrating |
| in Part C who  |   -----------                  | improvement in     |
| report that    | ----- ------- ------- -------- | performance in the |
| early          |                                | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
| intervention   |       FFY     FFY     FFY 2006 | February 1, 2009.  |
| services have  |                                |                    |
| helped the     |         2005    2006    Target |                    |
| family:        |                                |                    |
|                |               Data    Data     |                    |
| A. Know their  |                                |                    |
| rights;        |   A. Kno                       |                    |
|                | w their    88.5%   59.9%   90% |                    |
| B. Effectively |   rig                          |                    |
| communicate    | hts.                           |                    |
| their          |                                |                    |
| children\'s    |    B. Effe                     |                    |
| needs; and     | ctively  91.7%   49.7%   92.5% |                    |
|                |   com                          |                    |
| C. Help their  | municate                       |                    |
| children       |   the                          |                    |
| develop and    | ir children's                  |                    |
| learn.         |   nee                          |                    |
|                | ds.                            |                    |
| \[Results      |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]    |    C. He                       |                    |
|                | lp their   92.7%   70.4%   93% |                    |
|                |   chi                          |                    |
|                | ldren develop                  |                    |
|                |   and                          |                    |
|                |  learn.                        |                    |
|                |   -----------                  |                    |
|                | ----- ------- ------- -------- |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
|                | OSEP was unable to determine   |                    |
|                | whether there was progress or  |                    |
|                | slippage because the State     |                    |
|                | changed its survey and method  |                    |
|                | of analysis. The State did not |                    |
|                | change its baseline and        |                    |
|                | targets.                       |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
|                | The State did not meet its FFY |                    |
|                | 2006 targets.                  |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 5\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | OSEP appreciates   |
| infants and    | data for this indicator are    | the State's        |
| toddlers birth | .63%. These data represent     | efforts to improve |
| to 1 with      | progress from the FFY 2005     | performance.       |
| IFSPs compared | data of .56%.                  |                    |
| to:            |                                |                    |
|                | The State met its FFY 2006     |                    |
| A. Other       | target of .62%.                |                    |
| States with    |                                |                    |
| similar        |                                |                    |
| eligibility    |                                |                    |
| definitions;   |                                |                    |
| and            |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| B. National    |                                |                    |
| data.          |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| \[Results      |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]    |                                |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 6\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | OSEP appreciates   |
| infants and    | data for this indicator are    | the State's        |
| toddlers birth | 2.8%. These data represent     | efforts to improve |
| to 3 with      | progress from the FFY 2005     | performance.       |
| IFSPs compared | data of 2.53%.                 |                    |
| to:            |                                |                    |
|                | The State met its FFY 2006     |                    |
| A. Other       | target of 2.31%.               |                    |
| States with    |                                |                    |
| similar        |                                |                    |
| eligibility    |                                |                    |
| definitions;   |                                |                    |
| and            |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| B. National    |                                |                    |
| data.          |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| \[Results      |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]    |                                |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 7\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State reported |
| eligible       | data for this indicator are    | that noncompliance |
| infants and    | 95.8%. These data represent    | identified in FFY  |
| toddlers with  | progress from the FFY 2005     | 2005 with 45-day   |
| IFSPs for whom | data of 86.2%.                 | timeline           |
| an evaluation  |                                | requirements in 34 |
| and assessment | The State did not meet its FFY | CFR                |
| and an initial | 2006 target of 100%.           | §§303.321(e)(2),   |
| IFSP meeting   |                                | 303.322(e)(1), and |
| were conducted | The State reported that three  | 303.342 was        |
| within Part    | of five findings of            | partially          |
| C's 45-day     | noncompliance identified in    | corrected. The     |
| timeline.      | FFY 2005 were corrected in a   | State must         |
|                | timely manner. For the         | demonstrate, in    |
| \[Compliance   | uncorrected noncompliance, the | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| Indicator\]    | State reported that it         | due February 1,    |
|                | designated the two counties as | 2009, that the     |
|                | at-risk grantees. The counties | uncorrected        |
|                | were also required to submit   | noncompliance was  |
|                | status reports on efforts to   | corrected.         |
|                | achieve compliance.            |                    |
|                |                                | OSEP appreciates   |
|                | The State provided updated     | the State's        |
|                | data that one of the two       | efforts and looks  |
|                | remaining findings of          | forward to         |
|                | noncompliance was corrected    | reviewing in the   |
|                | prior to the State's           | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|                | submission of its FFY 2006     | February 1, 2009,  |
|                | APR.                           | the State's data   |
|                |                                | demonstrating that |
|                |                                | it is in           |
|                |                                | compliance with    |
|                |                                | the requirements   |
|                |                                | in 34 CFR          |
|                |                                | §§303.321(e)(2),   |
|                |                                | 303.322(e)(1), and |
|                |                                | 303.342, including |
|                |                                | reporting          |
|                |                                | correction of the  |
|                |                                | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in the  |
|                |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 8\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State reported |
| all children   | data for this indicator are    | that noncompliance |
| exiting Part C | 96.5%. These data represent    | identified in FFY  |
| who received   | progress from the FFY 2005     | 2005 with the IFSP |
| timely         | data of 95.2%.                 | transition content |
| transition     |                                | requirements in 34 |
| planning to    | The State did not meet its FFY | CFR                |
| support the    | 2006 target of 100%.           | §§303.148(b)(4)    |
| child's        |                                | and 303.344(h) was |
| transition to  | The State reported that seven  | corrected in a     |
| preschool and  | of seven findings of           | timely manner.     |
| other          | noncompliance identified in    |                    |
| appropriate    | FFY 2005 related to this       | OSEP appreciates   |
| community      | indicator were corrected in a  | the State's        |
| services by    | timely manner.                 | efforts and looks  |
| their third    |                                | forward to         |
| birthday       |                                | reviewing in the   |
| including:     |                                | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
|                |                                | February 1, 2009,  |
| A. IFSPs with  |                                | the State's data   |
| transition     |                                | demonstrating that |
| steps and      |                                | it is in           |
| services;      |                                | compliance with    |
|                |                                | the requirements   |
| \[Compliance   |                                | in 34 CFR          |
| Indicator\]    |                                | §§303.148(b)(4)    |
|                |                                | and                |
|                |                                | 303.344(h)**,**    |
|                |                                | including          |
|                |                                | reporting          |
|                |                                | correction of the  |
|                |                                | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in the  |
|                |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 8\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State reported |
| all children   | data for this indicator are    | that noncompliance |
| exiting Part C | 98.4%. The FFY 2005 data were  | identified in FFY  |
| who received   | 98.9%.                         | 2005 with the LEA  |
| timely         |                                | notification       |
| transition     | The State did not meet its FFY | requirements in 34 |
| planning to    | 2006 target of 100%.           | CFR §303.148(b)(1) |
| support the    |                                | was corrected in a |
| child's        | The State reported that two of | timely manner.     |
| transition to  | two findings of noncompliance  |                    |
| preschool and  | identified in FFY 2005 related | OSEP appreciates   |
| other          | to this indicator were         | the State's        |
| appropriate    | corrected in a timely manner.  | efforts and looks  |
| community      |                                | forward to         |
| services by    |                                | reviewing in the   |
| their third    |                                | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
| birthday       |                                | February 1, 2009,  |
| including:     |                                | the State's data   |
|                |                                | demonstrating that |
| B.             |                                | it is in           |
| Notification   |                                | compliance with    |
| to LEA, if     |                                | the requirements   |
| child          |                                | in 34 CFR          |
| potentially    |                                | §                  |
| eligible for   |                                | 303.148(b)(1)**,** |
| Part B; and    |                                | including          |
|                |                                | reporting          |
| \[Compliance   |                                | correction of the  |
| Indicator\]    |                                | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in the  |
|                |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 8\. Percent of | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State reported |
| all children   | data for this indicator are    | that noncompliance |
| exiting Part C | 95.2%. The FFY 2005 data were  | identified in FFY  |
| who received   | 96%.                           | 2005 with the      |
| timely         |                                | timely transition  |
| transition     | The State did not meet its FFY | conference         |
| planning to    | 2006 target of 100%.           | requirements in 34 |
| support the    |                                | CFR                |
| child's        | The State reported that four   | §303.148(b)(2)(i)  |
| transition to  | of four findings of            | (as modified by    |
| preschool and  | noncompliance identified in    | IDEA section       |
| other          | FFY 2005 related to this       | 637(a)(9)) was     |
| appropriate    | indicator were corrected in a  | corrected in a     |
| community      | timely manner.                 | timely manner.     |
| services by    |                                |                    |
| their third    |                                | OSEP appreciates   |
| birthday       |                                | the State's        |
| including:     |                                | efforts and looks  |
|                |                                | forward to         |
| C. Transition  |                                | reviewing in the   |
| conference, if |                                | FFY 2007 APR, due  |
| child          |                                | February 1, 2009,  |
| potentially    |                                | the State's data   |
| eligible for   |                                | demonstrating that |
| Part B.        |                                | it is in           |
|                |                                | compliance with    |
| \[Compliance   |                                | the requirements   |
| Indicator\]    |                                | in 34 CFR          |
|                |                                | §303.148(b)(2)(i)  |
|                |                                | (as modified by    |
|                |                                | IDEA section       |
|                |                                | 637(a)(9))**,**    |
|                |                                | including          |
|                |                                | reporting          |
|                |                                | correction of the  |
|                |                                | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in the  |
|                |                                | FFY 2006 APR.      |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 9\. General    | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | The State must     |
| supervision    | data for this indicator are    | demonstrate, in    |
| system         | 91.3%. These data represent    | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| (including     | slippage from the FFY 2005     | due February 1,    |
| monitoring,    | data of 96.3%.                 | 2009, that the     |
| complaints,    |                                | State has          |
| hearings,      | The State did not meet its FFY | corrected the      |
| etc.)          | 2006 target of 100%.           | remaining          |
| identifies and |                                | noncompliance      |
| corrects       | The State reported that 21 of  | identified in      |
| noncompliance  | 23 findings of noncompliance   | Indicator 9 from   |
| as soon as     | identified in FFY 2005 were    | FFY 2005.          |
| possible but   | corrected in a timely manner.  |                    |
| in no case     | For the uncorrected            | The State must     |
| later than one | noncompliance, the State       | review its         |
| year from      | reported that it designated    | improvement        |
| i              | the two counties as at-risk    | activities and     |
| dentification. | grantees. The counties were    | revise, if         |
|                | also required to submit status | appropriate, to    |
| \[Compliance   | reports on efforts to achieve  | ensure they will   |
| Indicator\]    | compliance.                    | enable the State   |
|                |                                | to provide data in |
|                | The State provided updated     | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
|                | data that one of the two       | due February 1,    |
|                | remaining findings of          | 2009,              |
|                | noncompliance was corrected    | demonstrating that |
|                | prior to the State's           | the State timely   |
|                | submission of its FFY 2006     | corrected          |
|                | APR.                           | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in FFY  |
|                |                                | 2006 (2006-2007)   |
|                |                                | under this         |
|                |                                | indicator in       |
|                |                                | accordance with    |
|                |                                | IDEA section       |
|                |                                | 635(a)(10)(A) and  |
|                |                                | 34 CFR §303.501.   |
|                |                                |                    |
|                |                                | In addition, in    |
|                |                                | responding to      |
|                |                                | Indicators 1, 7,   |
|                |                                | 8A, 8B, and 8C,    |
|                |                                | the State must     |
|                |                                | specifically       |
|                |                                | identify and       |
|                |                                | address the        |
|                |                                | noncompliance      |
|                |                                | identified in this |
|                |                                | table under those  |
|                |                                | indicators.        |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 10\. Percent   | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | OSEP appreciates   |
| of signed      | data for this indicator are    | the State's        |
| written        | 100%. These data are based on  | efforts in         |
| complaints     | one complaint.                 | achieving          |
| with reports   |                                | compliance with    |
| issued that    | The State met its FFY 2006     | the timely         |
| were resolved  | target of 100%.                | complaint          |
| within 60-day  |                                | resolution         |
| timeline or a  |                                | requirements in 34 |
| timeline       |                                | CFR §§303.510      |
| extended for   |                                | through 303.512.   |
| exceptional    |                                |                    |
| circumstances  |                                |                    |
| with respect   |                                |                    |
| to a           |                                |                    |
| particular     |                                |                    |
| complaint.     |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| \[Compliance   |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]    |                                |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 11\. Percent   | The State reported that there  | OSEP looks forward |
| of fully       | were no fully adjudicated      | to reviewing the   |
| adjudicated    | hearings in FFY 2006.          | State's data in    |
| due process    |                                | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| hearing        |                                | due February 1,    |
| requests that  |                                | 2009.              |
| were fully     |                                |                    |
| adjudicated    |                                |                    |
| within the     |                                |                    |
| applicable     |                                |                    |
| timeline.      |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| \[Compliance   |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]    |                                |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 12\. Percent   | Not applicable.                | This indicator     |
| of hearing     |                                | does not apply to  |
| requests that  |                                | the State because  |
| went to        |                                | the State has not  |
| resolution     |                                | adopted the Part B |
| sessions that  |                                | due process        |
| were resolved  |                                | procedures.        |
| through        |                                |                    |
| resolution     |                                |                    |
| session        |                                |                    |
| settlement     |                                |                    |
| agreements     |                                |                    |
| (applicable if |                                |                    |
| Part B due     |                                |                    |
| process        |                                |                    |
| procedures are |                                |                    |
| adopted).      |                                |                    |
|                |                                |                    |
| \[Results      |                                |                    |
| Indicator\]    |                                |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 13\. Percent   | The State reported that two of | OSEP looks forward |
| of mediations  | three mediations held resulted | to reviewing the   |
| held that      | in mediation agreements. One   | State's data in    |
| resulted in    | mediation request was          | the FFY 2007 APR,  |
| mediation      | withdrawn.                     | due February 1,    |
| agreements.    |                                | 2009.              |
|                | The State reported fewer than  |                    |
| \[Results      | ten mediations in FFY 2006.    |                    |
| Indicator\]    | The State is not required to   |                    |
|                | provide or meet its targets or |                    |
|                | provide improvement activities |                    |
|                | until any FFY in which ten or  |                    |
|                | more mediations were held.     |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+
| 14\. State     | The State revised the FFY 2004 | OSEP appreciates   |
| reported data  | baseline data for this         | the State's        |
| (618 and State | indicator in its SPP and OSEP  | efforts in         |
| Performance    | accepts this revision.         | achieving          |
| Plan and       |                                | compliance with    |
| Annual         | The State's FFY 2006 reported  | the timely and     |
| Performance    | data for this indicator are    | accurate data      |
| Report) are    | 100%.                          | requirements in    |
| timely and     |                                | IDEA sections 616, |
| accurate.      | The State met its FFY 2006     | 618, and 642 and   |
|                | target of 100%.                | 34 CFR §§76.720    |
| \[Compliance   |                                | and 303.540.       |
| Indicator\]    |                                |                    |
+----------------+--------------------------------+--------------------+