**Business Rules for Enterprise Planner -- Planning and Reporting**

The Service has established the following set of Enterprise Planner
business rules to prepare for the upcoming budget phases. Many of these
rules were developed from Washington and Regional office suggestions
from the lessons learned during the first use of Enterprise Planner in
reporting FY 2006 actuals and setting FY 2007 performance targets.

(1) The Regional offices will be the primary contributors for reporting
    FY 2007 performance actuals and setting FY 2008 performance targets.
    The Washington program offices will serve as the reviewers of
    performance information. The exception to this rule will be
    reporting and setting performance targets for the Law Enforcement
    and International Affairs programs, as these are solely Washington
    program office responsibilities.

(2) The Washington program offices will set Operational Plan performance
    targets for the Secretarial, OMB, and Congressional phases of the FY
    2009 budget process. These national, roll-up performance targets
    should be coordinated with the Regional contacts. For the
    Appropriations phase, the Regions will set the FY 2009 Operational
    Plan performance targets, with review by the Washington program
    offices.

(3) All contributors and reviewers must either attend Cognos training at
    NCTC, when available, or complete Enterprise Planner training on the
    DOI Learn website. Guidance on accessing the DOI website will be
    provided by the Planning office.

(4) In setting the majority of performance targets for percentage
    performance measures, the denominators may not be changed when
    reporting final performance data. These denominator fields will be
    made "read only" and are identified by "grey" shading in Enterprise
    Planner. The following is an example of a percentage performance
    measure with a fixed denominator:

> *Percent of NWRS baseline acres infested with invasive plant species
> that are controlled in FY 2007 in Region 5:*
>
> Planned numerator: \# NWRS acres invasive plants controlled (7,895
> acres)
>
> Planned denominator: total \# of NWRS acres infested with invasive
> plants (31,789 acres)
>
> *[Planned target: 7,895/31,789 = 25%]{.underline}*
>
> Final numerator: 9,000 acres
>
> Final denominator: 31,789 acres
>
> *[Final actual: 9,000/31,789 = 28%]{.underline}*
>
> Thus, the FY 2007 target was exceeded. Note: the denominator, 31,789
> acres, remained unchanged.

(5) For a few selected percentage measures, the final denominators may
    change from the planned targets. For example:

> *Percent of formal energy consultations completed in statutory
> timeframes in FY 2007 in Region 6:*
>
> Planned numerator: \# of timely formal energy consultation request
> responses completed (74 responses)
>
> Planned denominator: total number of formal energy consultation
> requests (98 requests)
>
> *[Planned target: 74/98 = 76%]{.underline}*
>
> Final numerator: 93 requests completed
>
> Final denominator: 115 requests received
>
> *[Final actual: 93/115 = 81%]{.underline}*
>
> For this measure, the Region could not accurately predict how many
> requests it would receive during the year. Therefore, the FY 2007
> performance target is that 76% of all requests would be completed in a
> timely manner, regardless of the number of requests received. Thus,
> the FY 2007 target was exceeded. As a result, the denominator was
> changed from its initial target. These measures will be identified in
> Enterprise Planner and the "Read Only" feature will be turned off, so
> the denominator may be changed.

\(6\) The Planning office has been working closely with the Washington
program offices for developing procedures for linking program corporate
databases, i.e., ECOS, TESS, HabITS, RAPPs, etc. directly to Enterprise
Planner. Thus, as performance measure data is entered in these systems,
the data will automatically be entered into Enterprise Planner, thereby
eliminating hand-entered data errors. So far, this process has been used
by the Refuge and Coastal programs. Our goal is to eventually have all
corporate databases linked to Enterprise Planner.

When the Regional offices (Contributors) and Washington offices
(Reviewers) engage in the process of reporting actual data or entering
performance targets, some errors invariably occur and must be corrected.
As errors or other inconsistencies arose during the first use of
Enterprise Planner, the Regional offices made the corrections in
Enterprise Planner. However, it was uncertain if the original corporate
databases were changed accordingly.

*Beginning with the next major phase in the fall 2007, all final FY 2007
reported or FY 2008 planned performance data that has been changed from
its initial value in Enterprise Planner, as a result of discussion
between the Washington program and Regional offices, must be updated in
the program's corporate performance database. An annotation must be
included in Enterprise Planner when the performance value is updated
stating that the data in the originating database has been changed
also.*

\(7\) In the current Operational Plan, some programs report to
lower-level performance measures. Some programs have expressed an
interest to delete some of these measures. The Washington and Regional
program staff should meet to discuss exactly which Operational Plan
performance measures the Regions will plan to in FY 2008, and have final
deletion decisions made by June 22, 2007. Those programs desiring to
delete these measures should meet with the Planning office in July to
discuss these measures in the context of the revised Operational Plan
that has been recently revised to reflect the new DOI Strategic Plan.
Final deletion decisions will be made by July 31, 2007. However, before
a measure is deleted, the following criteria must be considered:

> \(a\) DOI GPRA, PART, and other Operational Plan measures that the
> Director has labeled important cannot be deleted.
>
> \(b\) Many of the remaining measures directly support Operational Plan
> goals or Critical Success Factors. Deleting these measures may have
> serious ABC cost-mapping implications. Obviously, these measures must
> be carefully reviewed before deletion.
>
> \(c\) In addition, there are some performance measures that OMB, DOI,
> or Congress expect to see in Budget Justifications, or in other
> budget-related materials. These measures cannot be deleted.
>
> \(d\) Thus, this leaves the remaining Operational Plan measures that
> may be deleted if approved by the appropriate Service manager.