#  Part I -- The Schedule {#part-i-the-schedule .RFP-Part-Title}

## Section C {#section-c .RFP-Section-Title}

## Statement Of Work {#statement-of-work .RFP-Section-Title}

## Table Of Contents {#table-of-contents .RFP-Section-Title}

##  {#section .RFP-Section-Title}

[C.1 FFTF CONTRACT OVERVIEW 1](#c.1-fftf-contract-overview)

[C.2 State of Project at Contract Transition
1](#c.2-state-of-project-at-contract-transition)

[C.3 FFTF WORK SUMMARY 4](#c.3-fftf-work-summary)

[C.4 Government Furnished Services/Items
9](#c.4-government-furnished-servicesitems)

[C.5 Acronyms 10](#c.5-acronyms)

##  {#section-1 .RFP-Section-Title}

### C.1 FFTF CONTRACT OVERVIEW {#c.1-fftf-contract-overview .RFP-Clause-Title}

The purpose of the FFTF Closure Project is to safely accelerate the
deactivation and decommissioning the FFTF and its support structures
within the 400 Area Property Protected Area and return it to reuse
consistent with the industrial use designation of the site. Site closure
must achieve release criteria and technical basis which meet the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) risk level associated with
industrial use.

(a) The project includes: 1) maintaining a safe and compliant FFTF
    complex, 2) deactivation of the FFTF and support buildings and
    structures, 3) disposition of FFTF sodium, 4) decommissioning and
    demolition (and final closure) of the FFTF plant and the
    general-purpose support buildings located within the 400 Area of the
    Hanford Site, 5) project management and support, and (6) non-Hanford
    Site support of the FFTF Closure Project. The FFTF Security Area
    fence line defines the FFTF Closure Project's physical boundaries,
    (See Figure L.3). The major scope of each of these activities is
    further defined in Clause C.3.

(b) This contract reflects the application of performance-based
    contracting approaches and techniques which emphasize
    results/outcomes and minimizes "how to" performance descriptions.
    The contractor has the responsibility for total performance under
    the contract, including determining the specific methods for
    accomplishing the work effort, performing quality control, and
    assuming accountability for accomplishing the work under the
    contract. Accordingly, this contract provides flexibility, within
    the terms and conditions of the contract, to the contractor in
    carrying out the work specified herein.

(c) The contractor shall furnish the necessary personnel, facilities,
    equipment, materials, supplies, and services (except those defined
    and provided by the Government) to accomplish the scope of work.
    This scope of work is comprehensive in that the contractor is
    expected to perform necessary technical, operational and management
    functions to perform the work specified herein.

(d) The primary location for the performance of the work under this
    contract is the DOE Hanford Site in southeastern part of the State
    of Washington. Some travel to other parts of the DOE complex in the
    continental United States may be required.

### C.2 State of Project at Contract Transition {#c.2-state-of-project-at-contract-transition .RFP-Clause-Title}

Deactivation of FFTF is proceeding and the following provides relevant
information on the condition of the facility and on the state of
deactivation at the anticipated time of contract award. As such it
contains some assumptions upon which the offeror shall base their
proposal.

The sodium coolant is being maintained in a molten state in the reactor
vessel and fuel storage vessels. Fuel has been removed from the reactor
vessel and has been transferred to two sodium-filled fuel storage
vessels or to above ground dry storage casks (Interim Storage Casks
(ISCs)). The primary and secondary HTS loops and a portion of the
reactor vessel have been drained of sodium. This sodium inventory
(166,000 gallons) has been transferred to the Sodium Storage Facility
(SSF) and allowed to cool/solidify. Two immersion heaters are installed
in the reactor vessel for temperature control and heat input to the
reactor vessel. Section J, Appendix 3 provides a list of the FFTF
systems/subsystems. All Group 0, 1, and 2 systems have been shut down.
All remaining systems are being maintained operational to support sodium
temperature, fuel storage, cover gas supply, Interim Examination and
Maintenance (IEM) cell, heating and ventilating, etc. FFTF support
facilities and equipment are being maintained operational.

\(a\) The anticipated status of the fuel at contract transition is:

\(1\) 133 irradiated fueled components reside in the sodium-filled fuel
storage vessels and the IEM Cell. These include:

\(i\) The standard mixed-oxide (MOX) driver fuel assemblies, sodium
bonded metal fuel assemblies, carbide fuel assemblies, and other
miscellaneous fuel pins.

\(ii\) Seven (7) fuel assemblies containing breached fuel pins. Two of
these assemblies (ACN-1 and PO-4) contain pins that failed to the extent
that fuel erosion was detected by delayed neutron monitor signals. These
two assemblies are to be disassembled and the failed fuel pins
encapsulated.

\(iii\) Two additional fuel assemblies requiring disassembly in the IEM
cell, SRF-3 and SRF-4.

\(2\) One unirradiated component is stored in the Test Assembly
Conditioning Station that contains sodium-bonded pins.

\(3\) 87 sodium bonded and 3 NaK bonded unirradiated fuel pins are
stored at Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) .

\(4\) Up to 189 fueled components are stored in ISC's on the 400 Area
Interim Storage Area (ISA) pad.

Note: Fifty-three (53) fuel assemblies have been washed, loaded into 8
ISCs and are stored at PFP. These assemblies are no longer part of the
FFTF Closure Project.

\(b\) Repairs and upgrades have been completed on three of the fuel
handling machines; control upgrades have been made on the Sodium Removal
System (SRS) and the Closed Loop Ex-Vessel Machine (CLEM), and repairs
have been completed to the Solid Waste Cask (SWC). The fuel handling
equipment and fuel offload systems are being maintained and are
operational.

\(c\) A contract has been placed for an additional 22 ISCs. It is
anticipated the casks will begin arriving in late FY04. The ISC contract
will be assigned to the FFTF Closure Project Contractor at the time of
contract transition. Core Component Containers are stored on-site and
available for fuel offload. No other existing subcontracts are
anticipated to require transfer from the existing contractor to the FFTF
Closure Contractor.

\(d\) Together the plant and SSF contain about 260,000 gallons of
radioactive sodium. The SSF is operational and capacity is available for
the remaining plant sodium. The approximate inventories are made up of
the following:

\(1\) Approximately 166,000 gallons are stored in the SSF from the
draining of three secondary loops, the secondary side of the
Intermediated Heat Exchangers (IHXs), associated secondary loop piping,
the primary loops, primary side IHX and a portion of the reactor vessel.
Sodium residuals remain throughout the primary and secondary HTS loops.

\(2\) Approximately 44,000 gallons remain in the reactor vessel.

\(3\) Approximately 23,000 gallons reside in the Interim Decay Storage
(IDS) vessel, its associated piping, and in the core component pots
contained within the IDS vessel.

\(4\) Approximately 31,000 gallons reside in the Fuel Storage Facility
(FSF) vessel and its associated piping systems.

In addition, approximately 40,000 gallons of radioactive Hallam and
Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) sodium currently stored on the Hanford
Site in the 200 West Area.

\(e\) There are approximately 870 gallons of sodium-potassium (NaK) in
three small cooling loops. The two loops in containment (primary cold
trap N-5 and the IDS cooling loops) have been drained and flushed with
sodium. The NaK from the two loops was mixed with the primary sodium.
Approximately 400 gallons of NaK have been removed from the Fuel Storage
Facility cooling loop and NaK storage tank and the external loop flushed
and disconnected.

\(f\) Three flux monitoring systems are installed in the plant, as
follows:

> \(1\) Source Range Flux Monitoring (SRFM) System - Consists of 3
> fission counters installed within the 3 Low Level Flux Monitor (LLFM)
> assemblies installed in the reactor vessel. The detectors for these
> counters each contain less than 10 grams of enriched U-235. These
> detectors are cylindrical in shape (3.54 inches in diameter, 18 inches
> in length).
>
> \(2\) Secondary Power Range Flux Monitoring (SPRFM) System -- This
> system consists of 3 separate Boron-10 compensated ion chambers
> installed within 3 dry thimbles located in the reactor cavity between
> the reactor guard vessel and the wall of the reactor cavity. These
> detectors are cylindrical in shape (3.54 inches in diameter, 24.75
> inches in length).
>
> \(3\) Wide Range Flux Monitoring (WRFM) System - This system consists
> of 3 separate fission counters installed within 3 dry thimbles located
> in the reactor cavity between the reactor guard vessel and the wall of
> the reactor cavity. The detectors for these counters each contain less
> than 10 grams of enriched U-235. These detectors are cylindrical in
> shape (3.54 inches in diameter, 18 inches in length).

\(g\) Shipment of FFTF sodium bonded fuel assemblies outside Hanford
requires the use of an acceptable shipping container. The T-3 Caskis
currently available to serve this function, however it is currently
licensed only through 2006, its Certificate of Compliance (CoC) allows
only fpr shipment of up to 18 sodium bonded pins (with a total of 200
grams sodium allowed). RL has requested a T-3 payload increase up to a
full sodium bonded fuel assembly (169 pins and up to 1521 grams of
sodium). DOE-HQ will process the review, approve the payload increase,
and will issue a license certifying the T-3 Cask.

### C.3 FFTF WORK SUMMARY {#c.3-fftf-work-summary .RFP-Clause-Title}

This section describes the work scope to be accomplished under this
contract. The intent is to provide the best available information on
"what" work may proceed with regard to Tri-Party Agreement (TPA)
commitments and subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
but not to prescribe "how" or "when" individual work scope elements may
be accomplished. The contractor has the flexibility to develop the
project structure and to sequence the work, subject to NEPA
requirements, to optimize the project schedule to achieve safe,
cost-effective and accelerated closure of the site.

Physical completion of the FFTF Closure Project is defined as: 1)
complete the deactivation and decontamination of FFTF and support
facilities, 2) complete removal and shipment of remaining fuel and of
bulk sodium to appropriate storage, 3) complete the decommissioning and
demolition of FFTF and all facilities within the area defined by the
FFTF Security Area fence line (listed in Section J, Appendix 4), 4)
complete the disposition of all the bulk sodium including the
approximately 40,000 gallons of radioactive Hallam and Sodium Reactor
Experiment (SRE) sodium currently stored on the Hanford Site in the 200
West Area, 5) complete environmental restoration of the area including
backfill, and stabilize consistent with the industrial use designation
of the site, and 6) complete a confirmation of site closure compliant
with the release criteria.

The Project is structured to continue deactivation work (including major
contract activities identified below as (a) Maintain a Safe and
Compliant FFTF Complex, (b) Deactivate the FFTF Complex, and (c)
Disposition FFTF Sodium and Sodium Traps) primarily in accordance with
the May 1995 FFTF Shutdown Environmental Assessment and finding of No
Significant Impact (see Section J App. 5). Work defined in C.3 (d) for
decontamination, decommissioning and dismantlement of the FFTF will
follow and includes the entombment of the below grade portion of the
FFTF Reactor Containment Building with the de-fueled reactor. On July 8,
2003, DOE committed to perform a National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate reasonable
alternatives, including No Action and a preferred alternative, for the
final disposition (i.e. decommissioning and dismantlement) of the FFTF.
DOE shall decide and announce the end state in a Record of Decision
(ROD) within 12 to 18 months after award of this contract. A contract
modification may be required before proceeding with decommissioning
consistent with the conditions of the EIS ROD. Until the approval of the
ROD the Contractor is authorized to continue deactivation activities
consistent with existing NEPA decisions (see Section J App. 5).

The Contractor will be responsible for providing data packages
(environmental information) to support EIS preparation. The estimated
level of support is two technical staff over a period of twelve (12)
months.

The following lists Major Contract Activities:

\(a\) Maintain a Safe and Compliant FFTF Complex. Under this activity,
the contractor shall:

\(1\) Maintain facilities listed in Section J, structures, operating
systems and equipment, and monitoring systems in compliance with
applicable directives and regulatory documents until the facilities are
demolished.

\(2\) Prepare and package waste for disposition as required and dispose
as appropriate. DOE will make available Hanford Site disposal facilities
on a cost reimbursement basis.

\(3\) Maintain radiological control and access control to ensure
personnel safety.

\(b\) Deactivate the FFTF Complex. Under this activity, the contractor
shall:

\(1\) Clean and package FFTF fuel for approved storage:

> FFTF fuel, both irradiated and non-irradiated and both sodium wetted
> and non-wetted fuel components, must be prepared and delivered to
> approved storage. The sodium and NaK bonded fuel must be delivered to
> an approved dry storage location and the balance delivered to the
> Canister Storage Building Interim Storage Area (ISA) located in
> Hanford's 200E Area. The fuel components include:

1.  133 irradiated fuel components contained in sodium filled fuel
    storage vessels require cleaning.

2.  One unirradiated component is stored in the Test Assembly
    Conditioning Station contains sodium bonded pins.

3.  87 sodium bonded and 3 NaK bonded unirradiated fuel pins anticipated
    to be shipped to FFTF in FY-05

\(2\) Relocate ISCs containing FFTF irradiated fuel from the 400 Area to
the Hanford Site Canister Storage Building ISA. Upon receipt and
acceptance of the ISCs containing the fuel at the ISA, responsibility
transfers from the Contractor to the storage facility operator.

\(3\) Drain sodium and NaK inventories from the primary systems and
reactor vessel to the maximum extent practical. For sodium residual
disposition see Section C.3 (c)(2).

\(4\) Deactivate and prepare the FFTF plant, associated support
buildings, and associated operating systems and equipment for
decommissioning. Shutdown all auxiliary systems not required for sodium
residual disposition or decommissioning.

\(c\) Disposition FFTF Sodium, NaK, and Cold Traps. Under this activity,
the contractor shall:

\(1\) Disposition the approximately 300,000 gallons of bulk sodium from
FFTF, Hallam, and SRE. Approximately 40,000 gallons of the 300,000
gallons are stored outside of the FFTF Closure Project's physical
boundaries in the 200 Area.

\(2\) Remove and disposition sodium and NaK residuals from the FFTF
plant, FSF, SSF vessels, Hallam tanks and SRE containers. Bulk sodium
transportation may proceed only after completion of the FFTF Final
Disposition EIS and issuance of the ROD.

\(3\) Remove package and store the primary cold trap, the cesium trap,
and two sodium vapor traps. These components are expected to have dose
rates of several tens of R/hr to one hundred R/hr on contact. These
traps shall be shipped to a permitted storage location on the Hanford
Site pending final disposition. The Contractor is not responsible for
final disposition.

\(d\) Decommission and demolish the FFTF and support buildings:
Decommissioning takes place following deactivation and may include
surveillance and maintenance, decontamination or demolition as
necessary. Complete the decommissioning and demolition work scope in
accordance with applicable state and federal regulations, DOE Orders,
and the FFTF Final Disposition EIS and ROD (See Section J, Appendix 5).

The entombment of FFTF utilizes the below grade portion of the Reactor
Containment Building as part of the entombment structure. With the
containment dome above the 550\' level dismantled and removed, and the
containment building below the 550\' level filled with grout or other
material(s) that immobilizes the remaining radiological and chemical
hazards to the maximum extent practical, an engineered barrier, shall be
used to cover the containment area. The barrier, together with the lower
containment superstructure, the containment internal structures, and the
immobilization matrix (e.g. grout or sand) would form the entombment
structure.

Under this activity, the contractor shall:

\(1\) Demolish and disposition the FFTF and support buildings and
structures (See Section J, Appendix 4).

\(2\) Support buildings and structures shall be demolished to three-feet
below grade and backfilled to grade. FFTF buildings other than the
Reactor Containment Building (building 405) shall also be removed to a
minimum of three feet below grade and backfilled to grade except where
the entombment cap extends beyond the Reactor Containment Building
periphery.

\(3\) Disposition support systems and equipment in the FFTF and support
buildings (See Section J, Appendix 3).

\(4\) Entomb the FFTF reactor facility:

\(i\) Remove and disposition containment dome above 550\' elevation

\(ii\) Leave reactor vessel with internals in place

\(iii\) Move excess contaminated equipment into lower containment cells

\(iv\) Grout all lower containment free spaces

\(v\) Install an environmentally acceptable engineered barrier over the
entombed remains.

**Removal Alternative** - The following describes an alternate list of
activities for the above element C.3(d)(4) to define the actions which
may be needed if the ROD concludes that removal is the appropriate end
point for decommissioning.

\(i\) Remove and disposition containment dome above 550\' elevation

\(ii\) Remove reactor vessel with internals and relocate to 200 Area
burial grounds

\(iii\) Remove radioactive contaminated equipment, components, piping
and materials including:

\(A\) Intermediate Heat Exchangers

\(B\) Primary Pumps

\(C\) Primary isolation valves

\(D\) Primary overflow and storage tanks (These may be easier to
decontaminate than remove)

\(E\) IEM cell equipment

\(F\) Long test assemblies (28 and 40)

\(G\) Interim Decay Storage Tank

> Note that non-radioactive lower containment structure, equipment and
> major components need not be removed such as:
>
> \(1\) Reactor guard vessel,
>
> \(2\) Primary pump guard vessels,
>
> \(3\) Intermediate Heat Exchanger guard vessels,
>
> \(4\) H&V systems,
>
> \(5\) Mobiltherm Piping,
>
> \(6\) In-Containment Chill Water Piping,
>
> \(7\) Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) System tank

\(iv\) Remove hazardous materials (asbestos, lead, depleted uranium,
etc.)

\(v\) Grout all lower containment free spaces

\(vi\) Backfill over the remaining containment structure

The above list of six activities (i -- vi) completes the description
supporting the Removal Alternative.

\(5\) Comply with radiological release criteria in accordance with the
requirements of DOE Order 5400.5, Radiation Protection of the Public and
the Environment.

For radiological release of real property (i.e., land surfaces and
structures) the cleanup criteria shall be based on the EPA risk range of
10^-4^ to 10^-6^ (generally interpreted as 15 millirem per year to the
maximally exposed individual). Specific cleanup criteria shall be
developed using the appropriate RESRAD code, e.g., RESRAD, RESRAD-BUILD,
DOE-approved code parameters, and DOE-approved future use scenarios.
Sampling and analysis to demonstrate compliance with these specific
cleanup criteria shall be performed in accordance with the guidance in
the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual
(MARSSIM). A preliminary risk assessment for entombment is included in
"Risk Assessment for the Fast Flux Test Facility Entombment Option",
August 21, 2003.

\(6\) Disposition all waste: (includes but is not limited to
non-hazardous and non-radioactive waste; hazardous waste, including
asbestos and polychlorinated biphenyls; low-level radioactive waste; and
low-level miscellaneous waste to approved on-site or off-site disposal
facility(ies)). Waste minimization pollution prevention programs will be
adhered to the maximum extent practical, cost effectively and safely.

The contractor shall determine the disposition (disposal or excess) of
equipment and material that is no longer required. For radiological
release of materials and equipment, the release criteria shall be based
on either the generic guidelines in DOE Order 5400.5, or specific
DOE-approved authorized limits. Due to concerns regarding volumetric
contamination of material, a DOE Secretarial moratorium has been placed
on the radiological release of material.  This release limitation is
being addressed in such documents as the Draft Programmatic EIS for
Disposition of Scrap Metals (*DOE/EIS-* *0327*).  Until such time as the
moratorium is lifted, the contractor must operate to ensure that
radiation is disposed in an approved radioactive waste disposal
facility. 

Radioactive contaminated/hazardous materials may be disposed to the
Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) located in the
200-East Area, through appropriate regulatory processes. Specifically, a
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) ROD or Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) with an
Action Memorandum approved by the regulators is required to dispose
waste at ERDF. The contractor may choose alternative disposal solutions,
and is responsible for the preparation, shipment, and disposal of all
waste in support of its disposition.

\(e\) FFTF Closure Project, Project Management: Under this activity, the
contractor shall:

\(1\) Provide the management and direction of the FFTF Closure project.
This includes the project manager and his staff, project control, and
reporting functions.

\(2\) Provide those support functions that enable all other activities
to be performed.

\(3\) Provide a project Close-out and Decommissioning Project Final
Report, including all FFTF documentation files and records.

\(f\) Offsite FFTF Closure Project Support

Successful completion of the Project will require coordination with
organizations outside of the Hanford Site. The most significant offsite
coordination may involve disposition of sodium and fuel. The following
defines the areas for which support may be required for activities that
enable contract workscope performance. The contractor has the
responsibility for determining the level of support necessary.

\(1\) Bulk sodium disposition: See C.3(c) above. If the contractor
chooses to convert the sodium at ANL-W Sodium Processing Facility,
support requirements are identified in the Hanford Site Sodium
Disposition Trade-off Study, F0000-0079-ES-00, April 2002.

\(2\) Sodium bonded fuel disposition: See C.3(b) above. The contractor
shall coordinate with ANL-W to facilitate the transfer and acceptance of
sodium bonded fuel.

### C.4 Government Furnished Services/Items {#c.4-government-furnished-servicesitems .RFP-Clause-Title}

Clause H.6, *Hanford Site Infrastructure, Utilities, Data Systems, and
Stewardship*, provides a list of government furnished infrastructure,
utilities, and data systems on the Hanford Site. The Contractor shall
have use of the DOE RL Property Management System. All equipment,
supplies and other materials needed to perform this work and not
included in the above shall be supplied by the contractor.

\(a\) Within ninety (90) days after the effective date of this contract
and by September 1 of each year, the Contractor shall provide the
Contracting Officer an annual projection of needed Government Furnished
Services/Items (GFS/I) for the following fiscal year.

\(b\) Quarterly Updates: The Contractor shall provide quarterly updates
to the projected GFS/I to the Contracting Officer. Amendments to the
projection must be provided to the Contracting Officer 45 days in
advance of the need date to be considered timely.

\(c\) DOE will utilize the projected information to enable timely review
of each Contractor submittal. If the contractor's request cannot be
supported, DOE will notify the contractor.

\(d\) DOE shall approve or disapprove the contractor's deliverables
specified in Section F, Table F-1 within 60 calendar days of contractor
submittal or as specified.

### C.5 Acronyms  {#c.5-acronyms .RFP-Clause-Title}

**[Acronym]{.underline}** **[Definition]{.underline}**

AB Authorization Basis

ACES Access Control Entry System

AFFF Aqueous Film Forming Foam

### ANL-W Argonne National Laboratories - West

ANSI EIA American National Standards Institute Electronic Industries
Alliance

ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements

BLTC Bottom Loading Transfer Cask

BPA Bonneville Power Administration

B&R Budget & Reporting

CA Cost Analysis

CAGE Commercial and Government Entity

CAIRS Computerized Accident/Incident Reporting System

CAPS Cell Atmosphere Processing System

CCCS-S Core Component Conditioning Station-South

CCRC Centralized Consolidated Recycling Center

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act

CEQ Council on Environmental Quality

CFR Code of Federal Regulation

CLEM Closed Loop Ex-Vessel Machine

CLIRA Closed-Loop In Reactor Assembly 

CLS Closed-Loop System 

CO Contracting Officer

CoC Certificate of Compliance

CRT Condensate receiver tank

CX Categorical Exclusion

D4 Deactivation, Decontamination, Decommissioning & Disposal

DC Direct Current

D&D Decontamination and Decommissioning 

DEAR Department of Energy Acquisition Regulations

DOD Department of Defense

DOE Department of Energy

DSA Documented Safety Analysis

DHX Dump Heat Exchanger 

EA Environmental Assessment

ECAS Environmental Cost Analysis System

EDS/DAS Experimenters Data System/Data Acquisition System

EDS/CALC Experimenters Data System/Calculational Computer

EE Engineering Evaluation

EE/CA Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis

EDMS Engineering Data Management System

EIS Environmental Impact Statement

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986

ERDF Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility

ESH&Q Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality Assurance

FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation

FAS Financial Accounting Standard

FFTF Fast Flux Test Facility

FHI Fluor Hanford, Incorporated

FMEF Fuels and Materials Examination Facility

FOCI Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence

FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact

FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report

FSF Fuel Storage Facility

FTRIA Flow and Temperature Removable Instrumentation Assembly

FVA Floor valve adapter

FY Fiscal Year

GFI Government Furnished Items

GFS Government Furnished Services

GSA General Services Administration

HAMTC Hanford Atomic Metal Trades Council

HANDI Hanford Data Integrator

HDTS Hanford Document Tracking System

HEIS Hanford Environmental Information System

HEWT Hanford Employees Welfare Trust

HGIS Hanford Geographical Information System

HTS Heat Transfer System

H&V Heating and Ventilation 

HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

IEM Interim Examination and Maintenance 

IDS Interim Decay Storage

IHX Intermediated Heat Exchanger

IRC Internal Revenue Code

IS Information Security

ISA Interim Storage Pad

ISC Interim Storage Casks

ISMS Integrated Safety Management System

ISVAC Integrated Site, Vegetation and Animal Control Project

JCS Job Control System

kV KiloVolts

LMSI Lockheed Martin Services, Inc.

LPMS Loose Parts Monitoring System

L&I Washington State Department of Labor & Industries

MASF Maintenance and Storage Facility

MC&A Material Control and Accountability

MOTA Materials Open Test Assembly 

MOX Mixed-Oxide

MTCA Model Toxics Control Act

NaK Sodium Potassium

NTRC National Resources Trustee Council

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NM Nuclear Material

NOAV Notice of Alleged Violation

NOV Notice of Violation

NTCRA Non-Time Critical Removal Actions

OPSEC Operational Security

ORP Office of River Protection

ORR Operational Readiness Review

PAA Price-Anderson Act

PAAA Price-Anderson Amendment Act

PBS Project breakdown structure 

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

PDS Primary Data System

PFP Plutonium Finishing Plant

PHF Plug Handling Fixture

PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

QAPS Radioactive Argon Processing System

QA/SP Quality Assurance/Surveillance Plan

RCB Reactor Containment Building 

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

RCW Revised Code of Washington

RDT Reactor Development Technology

RFP Request for Proposals

RICS Refueling Inventory Control System

RMIS Record Management Information System

RL Richland Operations Office

RSB Reactor Service Building 

ROD Record of Decision

SAMS Sunflower Asset Management System

SEPA State Environmental Policy Act

S & M Surveillance and Maintenance

SNM Special Nuclear Material

SPSS Shielding Plug Storage Station

SRE Sodium Reactor Experiment

SRS Sodium Removal System

SSF Sodium Storage Facility

SWC Solid Waste Cask

SWITS Solid Waste Information and Tracking System

TACS Test Assembly Conditioning Station 

TPA Tri-Party Agreement

TSR Technical Safety/Requirement

VAC Volts Alternating Current

WBS Work Breakdown Structure

WIDS Waste Information Data System