BEE-spoke-data/govdocs1-by-extension huggingface dataset:
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC18/WG8 **N1072**

**ISO/IEC JTC1/SC18/WG8 Document Register, N1032_1072**

**Document Date of**

**Title Requestor**

**Number Request**

1032 90-01-18 Document register, N976_1032 WG8

1033 90-02-02 Meeting Notice and Draft Agenda for Bath WG8

1034 90-02-02 DIS 9541-2 (text for ballot) A. Griffee

1035 90-02-05 Considerations for revison of ISO 8879 C. Goldfarb

(Supersedes N931)

1036 90-02-05 DIS 9541-1 (text for ballot) J. Flowers

1037 90-02-13 DIS 10036 (text for ballot) E. Smura

1038 90-02-13 U.S. contribution on DIS 9541-3 X3V1/90-58

1039 90-03-21 Editors\' draft of SPDL S. Strasen

1040 90-03-22 Papers on Multimedia/Hypermedia

WG3 N1612 (includes WG5 N754, 750 \[=SC18 N2168\], 751;

SC18 2180, 2186, 2189, 2190, 2256

1041 90-03-22 TOS Reference Model, Part 2 WG1 N1027

1042 90-03-22 Liaisons on extensions to ASN.1 SC18 N2181, 2182, 2183

1043 90-03-22 Report of WG3 SWG to consider DSSSL (WG3 N1536) SC18 N2163

1044 90-03-22 Report of JTC1 SWG on EDI Model SC18 N2166

1045 90-03-22 *JTC1 Strategic Plan* SC18 N2167

1046 90-03-22 DP10445 (TC46) *Preparation of Manuscripts/* SC18 N2214

*Computerscripts for Publication*

1047 90-03-22 Liaison from SC24 on DIS 9541 SC18 N2237

1048 90-03-22 Report of Secretariat of TC130 SC18 N2241

1049 90-03-22 WD on Citations to Electronic Documents SC18 N2243

1050 90-03-22 Liaison from SC24 on Glyph Definitions SC18 N2296

1051 90-03-22 Liaison from SC24 on CGM and SPDL SC18 N2297

1052 90-03-22 SC24 NWI on Imaging SC18 N2298

1053 90-03-22 \_Towards Interactive ODA\_ WG3 N1558, 1559

1054 90-03-22 Report of Los Angeles meeting of WG8 J. D. Mason

1055 90-03-27 Multimedia interchange file format (IFF) C. Goldfarb

1056 90-03-28 Liaison on Font Services and Resource WG4 N1320

1057 90-04-06 Tutorials on HyTime S. Newcomb

1058 90-04-06 Delayed meeting notice, SGML-B, Paris C. Goldfarb

1059 90-04-19 Editor\'s draft, DSSSL S. Adler

1060 90-04-20 WG8 Annual Report to SC18 J. Mason

1061 90-05-08 Programme of Work WG8

1062 90-05-08 Recommendations of Bath meeting WG8

1063 90-04-25 U.S. contribution on DPI in SPDL X3V1

1064 90-04-25 U.S. contribution on DSSSL area selection X3V1

1065 90-04-25 DSSSL and SPDL alignment X3V1

1066 90-04-25 U.S. comments on progression of SPDL X3V1

1067 90-04-25 Voting summary on SC18 Programme (partial) SC18 N2151

1068 90-04-25 User requirements for SPDL WG1 N1110

1069 90-04-25 Liaison on Font Services meeting WG1 N1104

1070 90-04-25 Liaion on user requirement for SPDL WG1 N1084

1071 90-04-25 ODA Part 9, Audio Content Architectures WG5 N829

1072 90-04-25 Document Register, N1032_1072 WG8
**[Proyecto Bergantín Galveztown 1779]{.underline}**

**[CONVOCATORIA DE RUEDA DE PRENSA]{.underline}**

**RUEDA DE PRESA**

**DIA: martes 29 de Abril**

**HORA: 11:30h**

# LUGAR: Astilleros Nereo, Playa de Pedregalejo 1, Málaga. 29017

**[INAUGURACIÓN DE LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DEL HISTÓRICO BERGANTÍN
GALVEZTOWN]{.underline}**

El histórico Bergantín Galveztown, el barco que le dio la gloria a D.
Bernardo de Galvez, malagueño universal que gracias a su arrojo
consiguió doblegar a los ingleses en la revolución americana.

El proyecto de reconstrucción de **El Galveztown**, se fundamenta en la
necesidad de difundir la figura de Bernardo de Galvez, desconocida por
la inmensa mayoría de la ciudadanía y de la enseñanza de la carpintería
de ribera, arte estrechamente ligado a la historia de Málaga,
concretamente la Carpintería de Ribera de las Playas de Pedregalejo,
declarada recientemente Patrimonio Histórico de Andalucía.

Este prometedor proyecto ha nacido de la voluntad ciudadana, que en
España y en Estados Unidos se han propuesto estrechar los lazos
fraternales que los unen desde la Guerra de Independencia Americana,
decenas de instituciones, personalidades militares y civiles están
colaborando activamente en el propósito, como por ejemplo: **Universidad
de Málaga, St. Augustine Lighthouse Museum, la Armada española, Armada
americana, Navy Yard, Instituto de Historia y Cultura Naval,
Ayuntamiento de Málaga, Ayuntamiento de Macharaviaya, Ayuntamiento de
Coria del Río, Mystic Seaport, Universidad de Connecticut, Junta de
Andalucía, Liga Naval de Andalucía, Real Liga Naval Española, y muchas
más.**

Para más información:

Francisco S. Guitard, Dpto. Comunicación

952 20 73 38/ 650 07 84 83

<museo@astillerosnereo.com>

Rafael Díaz Nogueras Liga Naval Andalucía

952 27 05 74/649 45 36 62

Web: www.astillerosnereo.com
**Instructions for Uninstalling PCMS Client/Server Software**

######## Who To Contact For Help

For any technical problems (uninstalling the client server version,
website access) please contact your agency IT Support Help Desk.

######## Uninstall Your Current Version of PCMS

1\. Click on Start Settings Control Panel

2\. Double click on Add/Remove Programs

3\. Scroll down to Purchase Card Management System Ver 4.0 and click on
the text

4\. Click on the Add/Remove button

5\. Click the OK button once the Uninstall Wizard has completed
uninstalling PCMS

6\. You have successfully uninstalled PCMS

Note: If you have other Client/Server Oracle Applications on your
desktop, please consult your IT personnel before removing the software.
If you do have other Oracle applications loaded, have your IT personnel
remove only the PCMS files. These files have an extensions of .fmx or
.mmx
The information found on this page is derived from PAID data, which is a
direct reflection of the coding done by each station.

  ----------------------- ---------- ------------- ------ ----- ------ ---- ----- ------ --- ------
                                                   AFGE                                      UAN

  **VISN 8**              **STA#**                 C      FWS   NP     P    HYB   38         38

  Florida                 673A       OPC Orlando   14     54    229    39   61    137         

                          516        Bay Pines     21     387   937    34   590   810         

                          546        Miami         37     237   782    59   419   172        407

                          548        West Palm     34     232   629    22   388   523         
                                     Beach                                                   

  N. Florida/South        573        Gainesville   40     344   1376   98   874   1052       178 
  Georgia HCS                                                                                

                          573C       Lake City     5      147   344    38   84    29         144

                          673        Tampa         32     336   1121   78   745   413        832

  Puerto Rico             672        San Juan      56     310   870    55   703   848         
  ----------------------- ---------- ------------- ------ ----- ------ ---- ----- ------ --- ------

Legend: RO -- Regional Office C -- Canteen FWS - Federal Wage System NP
-- Non-Professional

> **P -- Professional HYB- Hybrid 38 -- Title 38**
**CORNYN: OFFICES OPEN 24 HOURS FOR CONSTITUENT HURRICANE ASSISISTANCE
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE**

** **

**[[http://www.cornyn.senate.gov/hurricane]{.underline}](http://www.cornyn.senate.gov/hurricane)
   *202-224-2934  ***

*** ***

WASHINGTON---U.S. Sen. John Cornyn announced Friday that his Senate
office would remain open 24 hours a day to help assist with constituent
questions and emergency coordination.

 

"Until further notice, our office will have personnel on hand 24 hours a
day to answer questions from constituents, and to provide support for
emergency coordination," Cornyn said. "I encourage Texans to heed the
warnings and directions of local and state emergency management
officials throughout this emergency."

 

 

**Washington DC office**

Tel: 202-224-2934

Fax: 202-228-2856

 

**State Offices **

 

Tyler

Tel: 903-593-0902

Fax: 903-593-0920  

 

Austin

Tel: 512-469-6034

Fax: 512-469-6020  

 

Dallas

Tel: 972-239-1310

Fax: 972-239-2110  

 

Houston

Tel: 713-572-3337

Fax: 713-572-3777  

 

San Antonio

Tel: 210-224-7485

Fax: 210-224-8569  

 

Harlingen

Tel: 956-423-0162

Fax: 956-423-0193  

 

Lubbock

Tel: 806-472-7533

Fax: 806-472-7536  

** **

**Information and links are also available at http://cornyn.senate.gov**

 

 

*Sen. Cornyn is a member of the following key Senate Committees: Armed
Services; Judiciary; Budget; Small Business and Entrepreneurship; and
Joint Economic. He is also the chairman of the subcommittees on
Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship and Emerging Threats and
Capabilities. He served previously as Texas Attorney General and Texas
Supreme Court justice.*
**DA 07-1562**

**Released: March 30, 2007**

**NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION FROM STREAMLINED
TREATMENT**

**WC Docket No. 07-40**

The application listed in this notice has been removed from streamlined
treatment pursuant to the Commission's streamlined procedures for
domestic section 214 transfer of control applications.[^1] Section
63.03(c)(1)(v) of the Commission's rules provides that, at any time
after an application is filed, the Commission, acting through the Chief
of the Wireline Competition Bureau, may notify an applicant that its
application is being removed from streamlined processing where the
Commission "determines that the application requires further analysis to
determine whether a proposed transfer of control would serve the public
interest."[^2] This application is being removed from streamlined
treatment for further consideration of the transaction.[^3]

1.  **Application of Infinite Communication, LLC, NationsLine New
    Jersey, Inc., NationsLine Delaware, Inc., and NationsLine North,
    Inc. for a Transfer of Assets Involving Authorized International and
    Domestic Carriers, WC Docket No. 07-40 (filed Feb. 28, 2007)**.

For further information, please contact Gail Cohen at (202) 418-0939 or
Tracey Wilson-Parker at (202) 418-1394, Competition Policy Division,
Wireline Competition Bureau.

[^1]: 47 C.F.R. § 63.03; *Implementation of Further Streamlining
    Measures for Domestic Section 214 Authorizations*, 17 FCC Rcd 5517
    (2002) (*Streamlining Order*).

[^2]: *See* 47 C.F.R. § 63.03(c)(1)(v).

[^3]: Except in extraordinary circumstances, final action on this
    application should be expected no later than 180 days from public
    notice that the application was accepted for filing. *See* 47 C.F.R.
    § 63.03(c)(2).
TECHNOLOGY BRIEF

**Quantitative determination of atmospheric hydroperoxyl radical**

For further information, contact Dorene Price.

**Description**

[Technology for measuring elusive atmospheric hydroperoxyl
radical]{.underline}

The technology is an apparatus that uses two conduits to separately feed
a liquid phase atmospheric sample and a reagent stream containing a
chemiluminescence compound to a chemiluminescent detector for detection
of the HO~2~ radical in the liquid phase atmospheric sample. The liquid
phase atmospheric sample is produced by treating it with a liquid phase
scrubbant and is subsequently reacted with the luminescent reagent for
detection by the chemiluminescent detector.

**Commercial and Technical Merit**:

Atmospheric hydroperoxyl (HO~2~) radical plays an important role in the
formation and transformation of numerous atmospheric chemicals. One
particular role is the one that it plays in the formation of
tropospheric ozone, which is well known as a component of photochemical
smog. Thus, there is significant interest in quantifying atmospheric
levels of atmospheric HO~2~ radicals. However, detection of atmospheric
HO~2~ radicals is a challenge due to their low abundance and short
lifetime. This technology is designed to overcome the difficulties
encountered in measuring the elusive atmospheric hydroperoxyl radical.

**Competitive Advantage**:

This technology is suitable as an additional tool for researchers and
industry alike involved in the measurement of atmospheric chemicals. It
is less cumbersome and less costly than existing atmospheric techniques
which merely provide indirect measuring capability. This technology
provides direct quantitative results, and distinguishes over RO~2~ where
R is a hydrocarbon moiety. In addition, the apparatus is light weight,
compact and does not have high power requirements.

The inventors of this new apparatus for quantitative determination of
atmospheric hydroperoxyl radicals are: Stephen Springston, Judith
Weinstein-Lloyd and Jun Zheng

Patent Status: U.S. Application Serial No. 10/930,587

License Status: Available, exclusively or non-exclusively, for research
and commercial use.
Profile

Vicki Farer

Keene State College

229 Main Street

Keene, New Hampshire 03435

603-258-2891

<vfarer@keene.edu>

**Keene State College 1991-1993**

**Safety and Health Coordinator**

**Keene State College 1993-Present**

Safety Studies Faculty

Courses taught:

Ergonomics

Organization and Administration of Safety Programs

Emergency Planning in Industry

Workplace Violence

Health and Safety Standards for General Industry

**Keene State College 1991-Present**

OSHA Education Center

Region One

Manchester, New Hampshire

Instructor for the following course:

Principles of Ergonomics

Health and Safety Standards for General Industry

Recordkeeping

Bloodborne Pathogens in Healthcare Industry

Ergonomics in Nursing Homes

**Keene State College 2005-Present**

Certificate Program in Safety and Emergency Management

Instructor for the following courses;

Health and Safety Standards

Ergonomics

Emergency Management

Accident Investigation
***Annotated Agenda***

**MAFAC**

**November 12-14, 2008 ∙ New Orleans, LA**

**1. Agenda item Title of Discussion:** LAPPs in the Gulf of Mexico

**2. Discussion Leader/Presenter:**

-   Phil Steele, NOAA Fisheries, Assistant Regional Administrator for
    Sustainable Fisheries

-   Robert Gill, Commercial Fisherman, Gulf of Mexico Regional Fishery
    Management Council member

-   William Tucker, Commercial Fisherman, FL

-   Alan Risenhoover, Director, NMFS Office of Sustainable Fisheries

**3. Objective/Purpose:** To hear specific feedback from various
perspectives on the Gulf of Mexico red snapper IFQ and the upcoming
adoption of an IFQ for grouper. MAFAC is interested in hearing both
positive and negative experiences in all phases of the subject of IFQs,
from scoping, planning draft rules, implementation, monitoring, and in
particular changes in the fisheries as a result of the IFQ as measured
by biological, economic, and social performance indicators.
Recommendations, lessons learned and potential "best practices" would be
welcome subjects covered by the speakers.

The proposed format is four speakers each presenting for 15 minutes,
followed by a 60 minute period of questions and discussion by the full
MAFAC, concluding with any Committee findings and recommendations to the
Department and NOAA.

**4. Background/Synopsis:** MAFAC has been supportive of the usage of
LAPPs in appropriate fisheries, and has made recommendations to NOAA
encouraging their adoption. References to greater LAPP consideration in
US fisheries has been published by MAFAC in their strategic vision
document and their new administration transition briefing paper.

Record of Decision:

Decision, Next Step(s) and/or Action:

Assigned to:

Due Date:
**§40.149 09/01**

**QUESTION:**

Can arbitrators change or overturn the MRO's determination about the
verification of a test result?

**ANSWER**:

• No. The MRO is the only person authorized to change a verified test
result (see §40.149(c)). The MRO can do so with respect to a
verification decision he or she has made, in the circumstances described
in §40.149.

> • An arbitrator is someone who derives his authority from the
> employer, or from a labor-management agreement. The arbitrator cannot
> exercise authority that the employer could not exercise on its own.
> The arbitrator could not overturn a decision of the MRO concerning a
> test verification any more than the employer could on its own.
>
> • This prohibition applies to substantive decisions the MRO makes
> about the merits of a test (e.g., with respect to whether there is a
> legitimate medical explanation for a positive, adulterated, or
> substituted test result or whether a medical condition precluded an
> individual from providing a sufficient specimen).
>
> • An arbitrator could determine that a test result should be cancelled
> because of a defect in the drug testing process involving the MRO
> (e.g., that the MRO failed to afford the employee the opportunity for
> a verification interview). But an arbitrator could not overturn the
> substantive judgment of the MRO about whether, for example, the
> information submitted by the employee constituted a legitimate medical
> explanation.

**§40.149; §40.209 09/01**

What is an employer to do if an arbitrator's decision claims to overturn
the result of a DOT drug or alcohol test on grounds contrary to DOT
regulations?

**ANSWER:**

• There could be instances in which an arbitrator makes a decision that
purports to cancel a DOT test for reasons that the DOT regulation does
not recognize as valid.

> • For example, the arbitrator might make a decision based on
> disagreement with an MRO's judgment about a legitimate medical
> explanation (see §40.149) or on the basis of a procedural error that
> is not sufficient to cancel a test (see §40.209).
>
> • Such a test result remains valid under DOT regulations,
> notwithstanding the arbitrator's decision. Consequently, as a matter
> of Federal safety regulation, the employer must not return the
> employee to the performance of safety-sensitive functions until the
> employee has completed the return to duty process.
>
> • The employer may still be bound to implement the personnel policy
> outcome of the arbitrator's decision in such a case. This can result
> in hardship for the employer (e.g., being required to pay an
> individual at the same time as the Department's rules prevent the
> individual from performing the duties of his job).
**Harry Danforth**

**Associate Area Director**

**Midwest Area**

Dr. Harry Danforth joined the Midwest Area as Associate Director,
Midwest Area, Peoria, Illinois, effective May 13, 2007.  In this
capacity, Harry shares line management leadership and cooperative
interaction responsibilities for the Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
laboratories and programs in the States of Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri,
Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan.                  

Dr. Danforth has had a successful professional career exceeding 26 years
with ARS.  He recently served as the Beltsville Area's Technology
Transfer Coordinator, a position he has held since 2000.  Additionally,
he has served on various occasions on special assignments as Acting
Associate Director, Beltsville and North Atlantic Areas and Acting
Research Leader, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, South Atlantic
Area.

Dr. Danforth received his B.S. in Zoology from University of Illinois,
Champaign-Urbana, Illinois.  He earned both his M.S. and Ph.D. in
Biology from Utah State University, Logan, Utah.  He is married with 2
children and loves speed boat racing.
**DA 06-1221**

June 6, 2006

Keith H. Fagan

Telenor Satellite, Inc.

1101 Wootton Parkway, 10^th^ floor

Rockville, MD 20852-1064

Re: Call Sign KA249

File No. SES-MFS-20060130-00172

> Call Sign E980136

File No. SES-MFS-20060405-00564

File No. SES-STA-20060503-00739

Dear Mr. Fagan:

On January 30, 2006, and April 5, 2006, Telenor Satellite, Inc.
(Telenor) filed the above-captioned applications to modify two earth
station licenses to add the INMARSAT-3F4 satellite now located at 142^o^
W.L. as a point communication. On May 3, 2006, Telenor filed the
above-captioned request for Special Temporary Authority to operate one
of these earth stations. Pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the
Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1), we dismiss these
applications as defective without prejudice to refiling.

Section 25.203(c) of Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.203(c), requires
applicants seeking to operate in bands shared co-equally with the
terrestrial service such as certain C-Band frequencies, on which the
Telenor earth stations operate, must submit a Frequency Coordination
report in their applications. This report describes and analyzes the
potential interference caused or potentially received by the proposed
operations. Telenor has not submitted a report for repointing the
antenna towards the INMARSAT-3F4 satellite at 142^o^ W.L. Accordingly,
all three applications are incomplete.

In addition, Telenor seeks special temporary authority to communicate
with INMARSAT-3F4 using the 3630.42 and 6455.42 MHz center frequencies.
The current license for the earth station[^1] authorizes operations in
the 3629.4-3631.6 and 6454.4-6456.6 MHz bands with 2.2 megahertz
necessary bandwidths (2M20G1D emission designator). Use of these center
frequencies are inconsistent with its license since 80 kHz of the lower
portion of the emission will fall outside its authorization.

### Furthermore, we note that although Telenor, in these applications, seeks a waiver for filing a Schedule S, the Commission's deliberations in any refiling would be aided considerably if the record were to include complete Schedule S technical information for INMARSAT-3F4, including specific frequencies and emissions. Finally, also any refiling must also include the information required by Schedule B regarding Range of Satellite Arc (E54/E55), Earth Station Azimuth Angle (E56 and E58), and Antenna Elevation Angle (E57 and E59) since the responses to these questions are dependent on the satellites with which the earth station seeks to communicate. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1)[^2] of the Commission's
rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112 (a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission's
rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, we dismiss all
three applications as defective without prejudice to refiling.

Sincerely,

Scott A. Kotler

Chief, Systems Analysis Branch

Satellite Division

International Bureau

[^1]: *See* IBFS File No. SES-LIC-19980211-00183.

[^2]: 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1). See *also* EchoStar Satellite LLC,
    *Order on Reconsideration,* DA 04-4056 (released December 27, 2004).
[Testing for Condition of Container - Questions]{.underline}

1 Procedures and requirements for condition of food container
examinations are found in:

\(a\) U.S. Standards for Condition of Food Containers

\(b\) AMS Handbook for Inspection of the Condition of Food Containers

\(c\) Visual Aids for Inspection of Containers, as appropriate

\(d\) All of the above

2 A critical defect is: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

\(a\) incorrect packaging or labeling of product.

\(b\) a health or safety risk to consumers.

\(c\) a leaking package

\(d\) None of the above.

3 A major defect is: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

\(a\) incorrect packaging or labeling of product.

\(b\) a health or safety risk to consumers.

\(c\) a leaking package

\(d\) None of the above.

4 A minor defect is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

\(a\) incorrect packaging or labeling of product.

\(b\) a health or safety risk to consumers.

\(c\) a leaking package

\(d\) None of the above.

5 For a lot of 1680 - 24lb cases of dry beans and each case contains
12 - 2lb poly bags determine the number of primary containers in the
lot.

\(a\) 1,680

\(b\) 42,000

\(c\) 20,160

\(d\) 40,320

6 A defective container that falls outside the predetermined sampling
pattern should be \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

\(a\) Counted as a defect.

\(b\) Not counted as a defect.

\(c\) Suggest that it be removed from the lot

\(d\) (b) and (c)

7 When the number of major defects found equals or exceeds the
applicable rejection number (Re) for the major defects the sampler
should \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

\(a\) Reject the lot.

\(b\) Expand the sample size.

\(c\) Accept the lot

\(d\) None of the above.

8 Reduced inspection plans shall be used except when the history of
inspection permits normal inspection or requires tightened inspection.

\(a\) True (b) False

9 A secondary container is \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.

\(a\) the immediate container in which the product is packaged.

\(b\) a collection of filled food containers of the same size, type, and
style.

\(c\) The container in which one or more primary containers are packed.

\(d\) All of the above.

10 Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) is the maximum number of defects per
hundred units which is acceptable as a process average.

\(a\) True (b) False
**MATERIALS SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM**

**SPEAKER:** Professor Tamas Vicsek

Eotvos University

Budapest, Hungary

**TITLE:** Crowd Control

**DATE:** Thursday, November 18, 2004

**TIME:** 11:00 a.m.

**PLACE:** Building 200, Auditorium

**HOST:** Peter Zapol

*Refreshments will be served at 10:45 a.m.*

**Abstract:** Can we reliably predict and quantitativly describe how
large groups of people behave? Here we discuss an emerging approach to
this problem which is based on the quantitative methods of statistical
physics. We demonstrate that in cases when the interactions between the
members of a group are relatively well defined (e.g, pedestrian traffic,
synchronization, panic, etc) the corresponding models reproduce relevant
aspects of the observed phenomena.

In particular, people moving in the same environment typically develop
specific patterns of collective motion including the formation of lanes,
flocking or jamming at bottlenecks. We simulate such phenomena assuming
realistic interactions between particles representing humans. The two
specific cases to be discussed in more detail are waves produced by
crowds at large sporting events and the main features of escape panic
under various conditions. Our models allow the prediction of crowd
behavior even in cases when experimental methods are obviously not
applicable and, thus, are expected to be useful in assessing the level
of security in situations involving large groups of excited people.

\* The above results have been obtained in collaboration with A-L.

Barabasi, A. Czirok, I. Farkas, Z. Neda and D. Helbing
Exhibit 7-1: Annual Recertification Initial Notice

Initial Notice \[To be signed by resident and owner at initial
certification and at subsequent recertifications\].

(Tenant's Name) (Date)

(Address)

Dear \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_:

As stated in paragraph \[15, 10, or 9---indicate the paragraph number
that corresponds to the paragraph of the model lease being used for the
tenant\] of your lease, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) requires that we review your income and family
composition every year to redetermine rent and assistance levels.

To complete our review of your income and family composition, you must
meet with (Resident Manager, Occupancy Clerk, etc.) and supply the
required information each year. (The Resident Manager, Occupancy Clerk,
etc.) will conduct your recertification interviews in (month and year).
We will send you a reminder notice when it is time for your next
recertification interview. At that time you must contact (the Resident
Manager, Occupancy Clerk, etc.) to schedule an appointment for an
interview.

\*\*Cooperation with the recertification requirement is a condition of
continued program participation. You must report the required
information and provide the required signatures to enable the owner to
process the recertification by the (insert the 10^th^ day of the 11^th^
month after the last annual recertification). \*\*

When you attend the interview, you must bring the following information:
(List all required information.)

I have read and understand this letter describing the requirement for my
participation in an annual recertification interview.

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Signature of the Head of Family Date

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Signature of Witness Date

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Public reporting burden** for this collection is estimated to average
10 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This
information is required to obtain benefits and is voluntary. HUD may not
collect this information, and you are not required to complete this
form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. This
information is authorized by 24 CFR 5.657, 880.603, 884.218, 886.324,
891.410, 891.610 and 891.750 require that the owner must reexamine the
income and composition of all families at least annually. By providing
tenants notification in advance of the scheduled recertification meeting
and the information they need to provide, the tenant is made aware of
the documents they need to retain throughout the recertification period
in order to reduce their burden at the time of recertification. This
information is considered non-sensitive and does no require any special
protection.
**PUBLIC NOTICE**![](media/image1.png){width="0.5027777777777778in"
height="0.5291666666666667in"}

**Federal Communications Commission**

**445 12th St., S.W.**

**Washington, D.C. 20554**

**REPORT NO. 2408** **May 2, 2000**

> **[CONSUMER INFORMATION BUREAU]{.underline}**
>
> **[REFERENCE INFORMATION CENTER]{.underline}**
>
> **[PETITION FOR RULEMAKING FILED]{.underline}**

Interested persons may file statements opposing or supporting the
Petitions for Rulemaking listed herein within 30 days, or as noted. See
Section 1.4 and 1.405 of the Commission\'s rules for further
information.

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

RM NO. RULES SEC. PETITIONER DATE REC\'D NATURE OF PETITION

\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\--

9867 Part 97 Dennis Kippa 03/16/00 Request Amendment of the Commission's

P.O. Box 434 Rules to Establish New Band Plan

Hawkins, TX 75765 Authorization in the Amateur Service

and

David J. Hill

P.O. Box 1393

Mount Pleasant, TX 75456-1393

(Filed by the Petitioners)

> -FCC-
The Association for Cultural Equity

The Alan Lomax Archive

450 West 41^st^ Street, 6th Floor

New York, NY 10036

PH: (212) 268-4623 FAX: (212) 279-3710

Dr. Margarita Mazo

School of Music

1866 North College Road

The Ohio State University

Columbus, OH 43210 USA

January 4, 2006

Dear Dr. Mazo,

Copies of works that you recorded were part of the large research
library of recordings assembled by Alan Lomax. They were housed at the
Alan Lomax Archive in New York, NY until March of 2004 when they were
moved to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. There they will be
heard, admired, and studied by people from all over the world. The
Library of Congress has agreed to make it a priority to preserve and
digitize this important collection.

We have been asked by the American Folklife Center to contact all the
collaborators and contributors to Alan Lomax's collection. You will find
enclosed with this letter a Contact/Heir Information Form. Please fill
it out and return it to us so that we can forward this information to
the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress. Also, you will
find two copies of a list of the above mentioned materials. Please keep
one for your records, and return the other with the Contact/Heir
Information Form.

The purpose of the enclosed form is to identify your present and correct
contact information so that we may inform the Library of Congress.
Anyone who wishes to use these materials for any non-commercial or
commercial reasons would then be instructed by the American Folklife
Center at the Library of Congress to contact you directly to receive
permission for that specific use. Please supply your primary contact
information on the form. If you would like to supply a list of
additional contacts or relatives please do so at the bottom of the form.

For future updates to your contact information, please address all
correspondence to: Director, The American Folklife Center, Library of
Congress, Thomas Jefferson Bldg, Rm LJG49, 101 Independence Ave. SE,
Washington, D.C. 20540-4610.

A copy of this letter was sent to you last year but we have not yet
received a reply. If you have any questions please feel free to call me
at (901) 508-6631 or Anna Lomax Wood (Alan's daughter) at the Alan Lomax
Archive.

With kind regards,

Bert Lyons

Artist/Collaborator/Estate Relations

Alan Lomax Archive

CC: Anna Lomax Wood

Jeffrey A. Greenberg, Beldock Levine & Hoffman LLP
![](media/image1.png){width="0.8013888888888889in" height="0.8in"}

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES** default Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration

Rockville, MD 20857

> December 16, 2003
>
> Barbara Chiponis
>
> Group Manager Regulatory Affairs
>
> Beckman Coulter, Inc.
>
> 1000 Lake Hazeltine Drive
>
> Chaska, Minnesota 55318-1084
>
> Dear Ms. Chiponis:
>
> Your petition for requesting the Food and Drug Administration for
> reclassification of In Vitro Diagnostics for Anti-Hepatitis A Virus
> IgM and Total Antibodies was received by this office on 12/16/2003. It
> was assigned docket number 2003P-0564 and it was filed on 10/01/2003.
> Please refer to this docket number in future correspondence on this
> subject with the Agency.
>
> Please note that the acceptance of the petition for filing is a
> procedural matter in that it in no way reflects an agency decision on
> the substantive merits of the petition.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Lyle D. Jaffe
>
> Division of Dockets Management
**STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN WILLIAM E. KENNARD**

*Re: Auction of Licenses for the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands Postponed
Until*

*March 6, 2001, Public Notice, WT Docket 99-168*

I believe a further postponement of the 700 MHz Auction (Auction No. 31)
is necessary as a matter of sound spectrum management and is consistent
with a balanced reading of all our statutory obligations. As the expert
agency charged with managing the nation's airwaves, it is of paramount
importance that the Commission allocate and assign as valuable a
resource as the spectrum in the 747-762 MHz and 777-792 MHz band in a
manner that comports with the specific statutory requirements of the
Communications Act governing spectrum management and spectrum auctions.
In complying with conflicting statutes, and resolving those directives
as we proceed toward an auction, I believe the Commission's primary goal
should be to conduct an auction that is fair, efficient, puts the
spectrum to the best use, and thereby best serves the public interest.

With that in mind, the Commission takes this action today in response to
a request from a large number of potential bidders asking us to do so.
Among the reasons cited for the request is the fact that industry needs
more time to develop their business plans and bidding strategies in
light on the special characteristics of this band. It is undisputed that
factors surrounding this spectrum, including the incumbency of the UHF
television broadcasters in this band, make bidder planning for this
auction unusually complex. In support of their position, industry
representatives cite Section 309(j)(3)(E)(ii) of the Communications Act.
Under this section of the Communications Act, the Commission must
provide an adequate time after issuance of bidding rules "to ensure that
interested parties have a sufficient time to develop business plans,
access market conditions, and evaluate the availability of equipment for
the relevant services." The consensus of the potential bidders for this
auction is that a September 6^th^ auction will not satisfy this
obligation. We are aware of no industry party or member of Congress who
oppose the industry request or rationale.

Although the Commission takes congressional deadlines very seriously,
upon weighing the statutory obligations of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2000 against those in our charter statute, the
Communications Act, the action taken today is appropriately tailored to
balance our responsibilities in a manner that best serves the public
interest. At the same time, I believe it is not possible to comply with
the Appropriations Act deadline and satisfy our obligations under the
Communications Act concerning our spectrum management responsibilities
and, in particular, our obligations to conduct fair and efficient
auctions. Accordingly, in order to ensure a successful and competitive
auction, and to meet all of our statutory responsibilities, I believe
postponement of this auction until March of 2001 is the right course for
this Commission to take at this time.
**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION**

![](media/image1.png){width="0.84375in" height="0.84375in"}**ENFORCEMENT
BUREAU**

Northeast Region

**Chicago Office**

1550 North Northwest Highway, Room 306

Park Ridge, IL 60068

March 21, 2007

**CERTIFIED MAIL NO: 7001 1940 0006 2993 3325**

**RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FIRST CLASS U.S. MAIL**

Mr. Bruce Heimes

Clinton, IN 47842

**NOTICE OF UNLICENSED OPERATION**

Case Number: EB-07-CG-152

Document Number: W20073232001

The Chicago Office received information that your Citizens Band Radio
Service radio station was being operated illegally and causing
interference to Clinton Township Volunteer Fire Department's radio
communications. On February 28, 2007, agents from this office inspected
the radio station at your location and confirmed that you were operating
a Yaesu FT-757, Galaxy DX 99V, Galaxy DX 44V, and General AP Hill DX
2517 which are non-certified CB transceivers. Your transceivers were
also connected to RF power amplifiers. By using non-certified equipment,
you voided your authority to operate this station.

Radio stations must be licensed by the FCC pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 301.
You are hereby warned that operation of radio transmitting equipment
without a valid radio station authorization constitutes a violation of
the Federal laws cited above and could subject the operator to severe
penalties, including, but not limited to, substantial monetary fines,
*in rem* arrest action against the offending radio equipment, and
criminal sanctions including imprisonment. (*see* 47 U.S.C. §§ 401, 501,
503 and 510).

**UNLICENSED OPERATION OF THIS RADIO STATION MUST BE DISCONTINUED
IMMEDIATELY**.

You have ten (10) days from the date of this notice to respond with any
evidence that you have authority to operate granted by the FCC. Your
response should be sent to the address in the letterhead and reference
the listed case and document number. Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3), we are informing you that the Commission's staff
will use all relevant material information before it to determine what,
if any, enforcement action is required to ensure your compliance with
FCC Rules. This will include any information that you disclose in your
reply.

You may contact this office if you have any questions.

James M. Roop

Acting District Director

Chicago Office

Attachments:

Excerpts from the Communications Act of 1934, As Amended

Enforcement Bureau, \"Inspection Fact Sheet\", July 2003
News From the Office of

Congresswoman Jo Ann Davis

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

For Immediate Release

Contact: Chris Connelly

Date: February 12, 2004 [www.house.gov/joanndavis]{.underline} Phone -
202.225.4261

Davis Rejects United Nation's Decision to Rule on Israeli Security Fence

(Washington, DC) - Congresswoman Jo Ann Davis, a member of the House
International Relations Committee, made the following remarks on the
floor of the US House of Representatives defending the Israeli security
fence and rejecting the UN's International Criminal Court's efforts to
get involved in this issue.

"Mr. Speaker, I rise today to protest the UN General Assembly's decision
to rule on the legality of Israel's security fence.

I have just recently returned from Israel, where I had the opportunity
to see firsthand the issues surrounding the security fence. Simply
stated Mr. Speaker, the purposes behind this temporary fence are to
protect the Israeli people from suicide bombers and terrorists in a
region marked by violence and instability.

However, the issue here today is not the lawfulness of Israel's security
fence. It is the appropriateness of bringing such a complicated and
political issue before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in an
unbalanced manner.

I am encouraged by the Administration's support for Israel before the
Court, and agree that such proceedings could undermine the negotiations
already underway between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. I
encourage Congress to join the Administration in sending a strong
message to the UN opposing this anti-Israel decision," said
Congresswoman Jo Ann Davis.

\###
Poster Presentation 1B-28

**Asparaginase II Fermentation Kinetics of *Saccharomyces cerevisiae*
*ure2dal80* Mutant: Effect of Nitrogen Source and pH**

Maria Antonieta Ferrara^1^\*, Josiane M. V. Mattoso^1^, [Elba P. S.
Bon^2^]{.underline}, Nei Pereira Jr^3^

^1^Far-Manguinhos -- Fiocruz, Av. Sizenando Nabuco, 100, 21041-250

Phone: 55-21-3977-2504; Fax: 55-21-2270-3912; E-mail:
<ferrara@far.fiocruz.br>

^2^Instituto de Química -- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

^3^Escola de Química -- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Previous results showed that the levels of the periplasmic asparaginase
II produced by the nitrogen de-repressed *Saccharomyces* *cerevisiae
ure2dal80* mutant were 4-fold higher when cells were grown in ammonium
and 16-fold higher when cells were grown in proline, in comparison to
the enzyme levels in the corresponding wild-type cells. However the use
of the non-preferred nitrogen source proline is not feasible due to its
high cost.

This work studied the kinetics of cell growth, substrate consumption,
asparaginase II accumulation and pH change in *Saccharomyces cerevisiae
ure2dal80* fermentations containing glucose as carbon source and
ammonium, urea or proline as nitrogen sources. All growth media showed a
C/N ratio around 30. The effect of pH was also evaluated in a first
round of proline fermentations using un-buffered and phosphate buffered
medium in the pH range 4.5 to 6.5. Best results were obtained in
buffered medium pH 6.5 and this condition was subsequently used in all
experiments. It was also observed higher enzyme stability during the
fermentation process. Proline and urea fermentations resulted in peak
enzyme levels of 269 IU/L and 270 IU/L respectively, which were 2.5-fold
higher in comparison to un-buffered initial pH 4.5 fermentations. Using
ammonium, a preferred N source, maximum asparaginase II levels were of
157 IU/L. As cell growth and glucose consumption were not affected by
differences in pH and nitrogen source, this lower enzyme level could be
related to the effect of the GATA factor Nil2p, that repress nitrogen
regulated genes, such as *ASP3* that codes for asparaginase II, in
ammonium grown cells.

As urea, a low-cost, non-preferred nitrogen source, successfully
substituted proline in the asparaginase fermentations, this substrate
could be preferentially evaluated for the production of other nitrogen
repressed enzymes and metabolites of industrial interest. Asparaginase
itself is used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
-   **[Pets:]{.underline}**

> Pets must be restrained on a leash which shall not exceed six feet in
> length, or be otherwise physically confined at all times. Leaving a
> pet unattended is prohibited. (CFR 2.15)

-   **[Bicycles:]{.underline}**

> The use of bicycles is permitted **[on paved roads
> only.]{.underline}** A person operating a bicycle is subject to State
> vehicle laws and park regulations. Bicycles are not permitted on
> trails. (36 CFR 4.30)

-   **[Metal Detecting:]{.underline}**

> Possessing or using a mineral or metal detector, magnetometer, side
> scan sonar, or other metal detecting device or subbottom profiler is
> prohibited. (36 CFR 2.1)

-   **[Wildlife Protection:]{.underline}**

> The following are prohibited:

-   The hunting, trapping, taking, feeding, teasing frightening, or
    intentional disturbing of wildlife.

-   Also, use of artificial light (spotlighting) to view wildlife is
    prohibited. (36 CFR 2.2)
**STATEMENT OF WORK**

**[CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAM]{.underline}**

**INITIATOR:** Felicia Bostic, OD, OITE, MEP, CRTP

Building 10, Room 1C129

10 Center Drive

Bethesda, MD 20892

Phone: 301-594-2535

Fax: 301-402-2158

The Office of the Director (OD), Office of Intramural Training and
Education (OITE), Medical Education Program (MEP) requires logistical
support for programs and activities in the NIH for the Clinical Research
Training Program.

# General

The costs associated with this program will cover air travel; hotel
accommodations; ground transportation and meals.

The CRTP will provide the contractor with information regarding
scheduled programs and activities as plans are finalized for proposed
conferences and meetings. We anticipate having various meetings and one
of them includes about 300 attendees. The CRTP will ensure that the
contractor receives the necessary information far enough in advance of
the dates of the scheduled activities to allow ample time for travel
logistics and conference related services to be provided.

# Direct Costs

Air Fare

Hotel and Per Diem: Assumes rooms rate does not exceed government rate

Ground Transportation

Food

# Labor

Labor costs include pre- and post-conference services. The contractor
will occasionally be required to be on-site at certain meetings in order
to handle travel logistics and other scheduled activities.

The Project Officer's responsibilities will be to provide the vendor
with a list of attendees and other valuable data who will participate in
the conferences with all their contact information.

# Period of Performance

August 2007 through December 2008

# Contract not to exceed

\$300,000

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Approved Disapproved

Michael M. Gottesman, DATE

Deputy Director for Intramural Research