**SOLICITATION FOR SUBMISSION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATIONS**

**OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY**

**AND RENEWABLE ENERGY**

**SOLICITATION NUMBER**

**DE-PS36-03GO93007**

![](media/image1.wmf){width="1.81875in" height="1.81875in"}

**HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY RESEARCH**

Issuing Office: U.S. Department of Energy

> Golden Field Office
>
> 1617 Cole Boulevard
>
> Golden, CO 80401-3393
>
> Date Issued: July 24, 2003
>
> Preliminary Applications Due: September 4, 2003
>
> Final Applications Due: December 19, 2003
>
> Point of Contact: James P. Damm, Contracting Officer
>
> Questions: See Section II.F

The Solicitation is available on the Department of Energy Industry
Interactive Procurement System (IIPS), site at:
[http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/)

##### TABLE OF CONTENTS {#table-of-contents .unnumbered}

NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: Differences in printers and user format
preferences may change the pagination and appearance of this document
from its original format.

[SECTION TITLE]{.underline} [PAGE]{.underline}

I. [INTRODUCTION]{.underline} [1](#i.-introduction)

A. Background [2](#a.-background)

B. Objective [2](#b.-objective)

C. Scope [2](#c.-scope)

II\. [GENERAL INFORMATION]{.underline} [3](#ii.-general-information)

A. Eligibility Requirements [3](#a.-eligibility-requirements)

B. Pre-Application Conference [3](#b.-pre-application-conference)

C. Time/Place for Submission of Applications and Solicitation Schedule
[3](#c.-timeplace-for-submission-of-applications-and-solicitation-schedule)

D. IIPS Registration and Electronic Signature
[4](#d.-iips-registration-and-electronic-signature)

E. Amendments [4](#e.-amendments)

F. Questions [4](#questions)

G. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number
[5](#catalog-of-federal-domestic-assistance-cfda-number)

H. Financial Assistance for Application Preparation
[5](#financial-assistance-for-application-preparation)

I. Cost Sharing [5](#cost-sharing)

J. Federally Funded Research and Development Centers
[6](#federally-funded-research-and-development-centers)

K. Sub-Awards to Debarred and Suspended Parties
[7](#sub-awards-to-debarred-and-suspended-parties)

L. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Requirements
[7](#national-environmental-policy-act-nepa-requirements)

III\. [APPLICATION PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS]{.underline}
[7](#iii.-application-preparation-instructions)

A. General [7](#general)

B. Preliminary Application Content
[8](#b.-preliminary-application-content)

C. Final Application Content [10](#c.-final-application-content)

D. Proprietary Application Information
[15](#proprietary-application-information)

E. If Selected For Award [15](#e.-if-selected-for-award)

IV\. [EVALUATION OF APPLICATIONS]{.underline}
[16](#iv.-evaluation-of-applications)

A. Compliance Review [16](#a.-compliance-review)

B. Minimum Qualifications [16](#b.-minimum-qualifications)

C. Comprehensive Evaluations [16](#c.-comprehensive-evaluations)

D. Evaluation Criteria for Comprehensive Evaluations
[17](#d.-evaluation-criteria-for-comprehensive-evaluations)

E. Program Policy Factors [19](#e.-program-policy-factors)

V. [ADDITIONAL INFORMATION]{.underline} [19](#v.-additional-information)

A. Clarifications [19](#a.-clarifications)

B. Debriefing After Selections [19](#b.-debriefing-after-selections)

APPENDIX A -- DEFINITIONS [1](#appendix-a-definitions)

APPENDIX B -- INDUSTRY INTERACTIVE PROCUREMENT SYSTEM (IIPS)
[1](#appendix-b-industry-interactive-procurement-system-iips)

APPENDIX C -- TECHNOLOGY TOPICS [1](#appendix-c-technology-topics)

Technology Exclusions from this Solicitation
[1](#technology-exclusions-from-this-solicitation)

Topic 1. Hydrogen from Biomass [1](#topic-1.-hydrogen-from-biomass)

Topic 2. Photolytic Processes [3](#topic-2.-photolytic-processes)

Topic 3. Distributed Reforming Production Technologies
[6](#topic-3.-distributed-reforming-production-technologies)

Topic 4. Separation and Purification Technologies
[8](#topic-4.-separation-and-purification-technologies)

Topic 5. Advanced Electrolysis Systems
[9](#topic-5.-number-range-chapteradvanced-electrolysis-systems)

Topic 6. Hydrogen Production Using High-Temperature Thermochemical Water
Splitting Cycles
[10](#topic-6.-hydrogen-production-using-high-temperature-thermochemical-water-splitting-cycles)

Topic 7. Hydrogen Production Infrastructure Analysis
[12](#topic-7.-hydrogen-production-infrastructure-analysis)

Topic 8. Hydrogen Delivery [13](#topic-8.-hydrogen-delivery)

Topic 9. Crosscutting Projects [17](#topic-9.-crosscutting-projects)

Topic 10. University Projects [17](#topic-10.-university-projects)

##### HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY RESEARCH {#hydrogen-production-and-delivery-research .unnumbered}

## I. [INTRODUCTION]{.underline} {#i.-introduction .unnumbered}

The Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies
(OHFCIT) of the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy is soliciting financial assistance Applications
with the objective of supporting the President's Hydrogen Fuel
Initiative in developing a path to a hydrogen economy. The DOE Office of
Fossil Energy is also contributing funding to this Solicitation in
collaboration with the OHFCIT for Topic 4 (Separations and Purification
Technologies) of this Solicitation. DOE intends to provide financial
support for this effort under authority of the Hydrogen Future Act of
1996.

Under this Solicitation, DOE is soliciting Applications for research in
several specific hydrogen production and delivery technologies. Through
an Expression of Program Interest (EOPI) issued earlier in 2003, DOE
requested input from interested parties regarding recommended research
topics to be included in this Solicitation. EOPI submissions were used
by DOE to develop portions of the Technical Topics for this
Solicitation. The research funding under this Solicitation is targeted
to enable achievement of the goals and objectives of the OHFCIT
Multi-Year Program Plan in the areas of Hydrogen Production and
Delivery. The Draft Plan can be viewed at
[www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells](http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells)
. As described in Appendix C, the following ten Topics (some including
Sub-Topics) are allowable areas for Applications:

1.  Hydrogen From Biomass

2.  Photolytic Processes

3.  Distributed Production Technologies

4.  Separation and Purification Technologies

5.  Advanced Electrolysis Systems

6.  Hydrogen Production Using High Temperature Thermochemical Water
    Splitting Cycles

7.  Hydrogen Production Infrastructure Analysis

8.  Hydrogen Delivery

9.  Crosscutting Projects

10. University Projects

If these Topics are not applicable to a potential Applicant's hydrogen
technology, other opportunities for financial assistance may be
available. For example, technologies to produce hydrogen in large,
central facilities from coal and natural gas are being funded under
solicitations issued by the DOE Office of Fossil Energy. The DOE
"FutureGen" initiative would provide for the design, construction, and
operation of an integrated coal-fueled central production facility that
will produce electricity and hydrogen with carbon capture and
sequestration. Information on this initiative and other planned hydrogen
research and development efforts from fossil resources can be accessed
through the National Energy Technology Laboratory website at
[www.netl.doe.gov](http://www.netl.doe.gov/) . Also, it is anticipated
that additional solicitations will be issued in the near future by the
DOE Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies. It
is recommended that potential Applicants periodically monitor the
Program website at
[www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells](http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells)
to determine if an appropriate solicitation is posted that includes the
technology interests of the Applicant.

Awards under this Solicitation will be Cooperative Agreements with a
term of two to four years beginning in Fiscal Year 2004. DOE anticipates
selecting up to 28 Applications for negotiation of Award. Subject to the
availability of annual congressional appropriations, the total
cumulative DOE funding available under this Solicitation for all
projects is anticipated to be up to \$80 million over the four-year
period.

The required minimum cost share varies by type and stage of the
technology as described in Appendix C.

A two-step technical evaluation process will be used by DOE for
Applications submitted under this Solicitation. The first step will
include the Applicant submittal of a brief Preliminary Application that
will be evaluated by DOE based on criteria specified in Section IV.D,
Evaluation Criteria for Preliminary Application. As a result of this
preliminary review, each Applicant will either be requested to submit a
Final Application package or be removed from the competition. In either
case, a letter of explanation will be provided to each Applicant. The
second evaluation step will include detailed technical merit reviews of
the Final Application packages based on criteria specified in Section
IV.D, Evaluation Criteria for Final Application.

Appendix A contains definitions of terms and acronyms that are used in
this Solicitation.

Applications must be submitted through the DOE Industry Interactive
Procurement System (IIPS). Any other form of submission will not be
accepted. Instructions for submitting Applications using IIPS are
contained in Appendix B.

### A. Background {#a.-background .unnumbered}

Transportation accounts for 2/3 of the 20 million barrels of oil
consumed each day. The United States currently imports 55% of the
petroleum we use. In response to the energy security concerns posed by
reliance on foreign sources of energy, as well as concerns about
regional air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, the U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE) has initiated a number of programs to develop
technologies that offer improved energy efficiency and that produce and
utilize energy from diverse domestic and renewable sources.

In the January 2003 State of the Union Address, President Bush
reaffirmed the Nation's commitment to energy independence and an
improved environment by proposing \$1.2 billion in research funding for
hydrogen and fuel cell technologies over the next five years.
Subsequently, the President proposed a Hydrogen Fuel Initiative that
complements FreedomCAR to develop both a hydrogen infrastructure for the
low-cost production of hydrogen and advanced hydrogen fuel cell
vehicles. Further information on the DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and
Infrastructure Technologies Program, including the draft Multi-Year
Program Plan, can be viewed at
[www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells](http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells).

### B. Objective {#b.-objective .unnumbered}

The Program objective is to produce and deliver hydrogen that is
economically competitive with conventional fuels and energy sources for
applications in transportation and stationary PEM fuel cell power
generation. Hydrogen produced today costs between \$5 and \$6 per
kilogram, and this cost should be reduced to \$1.50 per kilogram to be
competitive with conventional fuels and energy sources. DOE is
interested in hydrogen production or delivery concepts that can
contribute to this Program objective.

### C. Scope {#c.-scope .unnumbered}

This Solicitation seeks financial assistance Applications for research
regarding specific hydrogen production and delivery technologies from
the laboratory-scale through pilot-plant-scale that can meet the Program
objectives. Appendix C provides a detailed description of the ten
distinct Topic areas where Applications are sought by DOE. The Topics
and Sub-Topics in Appendix C are the [only]{.underline} eligible
research areas under this Solicitation.

**Each individual Application must respond to only [one]{.underline} of
the ten Topics in Appendix C. In addition, if Sub-Topics are specified
under a Topic, each individual Application must respond to only
[one]{.underline} Sub-Topic.** However, an Applicant may submit
multiple, unique Applications and respond to multiple Topics and
Sub-Topics.

## II. [GENERAL INFORMATION]{.underline} {#ii.-general-information .unnumbered}

### A. Eligibility Requirements {#a.-eligibility-requirements .unnumbered}

Any private-sector non-profit or for-profit organization, university or
other institution of higher education, or state/local entity is eligible
to participate in proposed projects under this Solicitation. However, in
order to be eligible for an Award under this Solicitation, the following
factors must be satisfied:

1.  A private-sector organization (for-profit or non-profit)
    [must]{.underline} be the Applicant for all proposed projects under
    Topics 1 through 9 in Appendix C.

2.  Each project team under Topics 1 through 9 in Appendix C must have a
    minimum of two team members, with the Applicant as the team lead.
    Collaborations among industry, universities, and national labs are
    encouraged.

3.  Topic 10 in Appendix C is reserved for university Applicants only as
    a single university or in collaboration with other universities,
    with the Applicant as the lead university.

Applications submitted by Federally Funded Research and Development
Centers (FFRDCs), as defined by [Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
35.017](http://www.arnet.gov/far/loadmainre.html), will not be
considered for Award. However, Applications proposing a portion of the
work to be performed by a FFRDC, including a DOE research laboratory,
will be considered for Award. Instructions for including FFRDC
activities within an Application are provided in Section II.

### B. Pre-Application Conference {#b.-pre-application-conference .unnumbered}

A pre-Application conference will not be conducted under this
Solicitation.

### C. Time/Place for Submission of Applications and Solicitation Schedule {#c.-timeplace-for-submission-of-applications-and-solicitation-schedule .unnumbered}

The anticipated schedule for this Solicitation is summarized as follows:

> Preliminary Applications due: September 4, 2003
>
> Request for Final Applications issued by DOE: October 22, 2003
>
> Final Applications due: December 19, 2003.

**IIPS WILL AUTOMATICALLY TIME-STAMP EACH APPLICATION WHEN THE FILE
TRANSMISSION BEGINS. ALL [PRELIMINARY]{.underline} APPLICATIONS MUST
HAVE AN IIPS TRANSMISSION TIME STAMP NO LATER THAN 8:00 P.M.
[EASTERN]{.underline} TIME ON [SEPTEMBER 4, 2003]{.underline}. A
Preliminary Application received after the aforementioned date and time
will result in the Applicant being ineligible to submit a Final
Application.**

**ALL [FINAL]{.underline} APPLICATIONS MUST HAVE AN IIPS TRANSMISSION
TIME STAMP NO LATER THAN 8:00 P.M. [EASTERN]{.underline} TIME ON
[DECEMBER 19, 2003]{.underline}. A Final Application received after the
aforementioned date and time will not be eligible for an award.**

DOE reserves the right to extend the closing date for Applications, if
necessary, and will provide notification via an Amendment to this
Solicitation posted on IIPS.

All Applications shall be submitted through DOE's IIPS in accordance
with the instructions included in this Solicitation (see Appendix B).
For questions regarding the operation of IIPS, contact the IIPS Help
Desk at <IIPS_HelpDesk@e-center.doe.gov> or at 1-800-683-0751 and select
Option 1.

Applicants are strongly encouraged to transmit Applications as soon as
possible to ensure timely submission and allow time to resolve any
possible transmission problems. **Applicants should begin transmission
at least 48 hours in advance of the deadline in order to assure that the
full Application is received by DOE through IIPS.**

For instructions regarding revisions, deletions, and withdrawals of
Applications, see Appendix B.

### D. IIPS Registration and Electronic Signature {#d.-iips-registration-and-electronic-signature .unnumbered}

Applicants are encouraged to register in IIPS at least 14 days prior to
the Solicitation closing date in accordance with registration
instructions in Appendix B. Applicants only need to register once for
both the Preliminary and Final Application submissions. Once prospective
Applicants are registered, only DOE personnel and technical evaluators
will have access to Application information.

If any registration problems are encountered, contact the IIPS Help Desk
at <IIPS_HelpDesk@e-center.doe.gov>, or at 1-800-683-0751.

Submission of electronic Applications via IIPS constitutes submission of
signed copies of the required documents. The name of the Applicant's
authorized official shall be typed in the appropriate space shown on the
forms.

### E. Amendments {#e.-amendments .unnumbered}

All Amendments to the Solicitation shall be posted on the DOE Industry
Interactive Procurement System (IIPS) at
[http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/) . Each Amendment
file will be available in the folder located next to the Solicitation
Number on the IIPS page that lists all opportunities/solicitations for
the Golden Field Office (this folder does not appear if no Amendments or
messages have been posted by DOE for the Solicitation). To be notified
of Amendments, see "Join Mailing List" in Appendix B. However, during
the open period of this Solicitation, potential Applicants are
responsible for periodically checking the DOE IIPS web site specified
above to determine if Amendments have been posted (even if Applicants
joined the mailing list in case e-mail notifications are not
successfully delivered).

### Questions

All questions concerning this Solicitation must be submitted through
IIPS by **DECEMBER 5, 2003**. See Appendix B regarding the \"Submit
Question\" feature. The questions and associated answers will be posted
on IIPS and can be accessed on the IIPS "Solicitation Form" page by
clicking on the button titled "View Questions" (the button will not
appear if no questions/answers have been posted by DOE). Potential
Applicants are responsible for periodically checking the DOE IIPS web
site at [http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/) to determine
if Questions and Answers have been posted.

### Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number

The CFDA number for this Solicitation is 81.087. Additionally, it is the
opinion of DOE that Executive Order 12372, which requires review of
certain Financial Assistance Applications by states, does not apply to
this action. However, each Applicant should contact its state office of
Federal programs to determine if the order applies.

### Financial Assistance for Application Preparation

DOE assumes no responsibility for any costs associated with Application
preparation or submission of Applications. No funding will be available
under the DOE Minority Economic Impact (MEI) loan program for
preparation of Applications in response to this Solicitation.

### Cost Sharing

For this Solicitation, the appropriate Applicant cost share varies with
the type and stage of the hydrogen technology proposed. Each project
proposed under this Solicitation must include cost share commensurate
with the stage of the technology. As described in Appendix C, different
technology Topics are allowable, and the minimum required Applicant cost
share is specified in Appendix C for each Topic. In those cases where a
Topic has Sub-Topics specified, the cost share level is indicated for
each Sub-Topic rather than for the overall Topic. Private sector
organizations are required to be the Applicant for Topics 1 through 9 in
Appendix C (per Section II.A) and, thus, must fulfill the minimum cost
share level for each Topic or Sub-Topic. For Topic 10, however,
universities must be the Applicant (per Section II.A).

Although the authorizing legislation for this Solicitation is the
Hydrogen Future Act of 1996, prospective Applicants should be aware that
new legislation is currently pending in the U.S. Congress that could
supercede the Act. The new legislation could change some of the terms in
this Solicitation, such as cost share requirements. All financial
assistance awards resulting from this Solicitation will be based on the
hydrogen legislation that is in effect at the time of the award. If this
occurs, DOE will notify all Applicants of the required changes.

The minimum Applicant cost share contribution is based on the
[total]{.underline} project cost. Note that the [total]{.underline}
project cost is the sum of the DOE cost share plus the Applicant cost
share. As an example, the minimum Applicant cost share requirement for a
hypothetical project with a Total Project Cost of \$400,000 and a 25%
cost share requirement would be:

> Total Project Cost: \$400,000
>
> Applicant share, 25% \$100,000
>
> DOE share, 75% \$300,000

Please note that the required minimum Applicant cost share percentage is
**[not]{.underline}** based on the DOE share but, rather, is based on
the Total Project Cost.

The Applicant cost share levels in Appendix C are specific to this
Solicitation. Even though research is still required, certain hydrogen
technologies are advancing, both technically and economically, and show
potential for successful commercialization in the near term. Certain
other technologies are at an earlier conceptual/feasibility stage where
more research must be performed to determine if eventual
commercialization is likely. As a result, DOE has determined that it is
appropriate that Applicant cost share levels for developmental
activities should be higher for those technologies that are emerging as
possible eventual commercialization candidates compared to those
technologies at an earlier research stage. The various Applicant cost
share levels in Appendix C reflect this DOE determination.

In-kind contributions (e.g., work in-kind, contributions of services or
property; donated equipment, buildings, or land; donated supplies; or
unrecovered allowable indirect costs) incurred as part of this Project
may be considered as all or part of the Cost Share as described under
[*10 CFR 600.123 and
600.224*](http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_00/10cfr600_00.html).
All Applicant Cost Sharing must come from non-Federal sources (i.e.,
private, state or local Government, or any other sources that were not
originally derived from Federal funds).

The Hydrogen Future Act of 1996 includes a requirement that "the
Secretary shall not consider a proposal submitted by a person from
industry unless the proposal contains a certification that reasonable
efforts to obtain non-federal funding for the entire cost of the project
have been made, and that such non-federal funding could not be
reasonably obtained." As a result, an Applicant selected for the
negotiation of an Award (only applicable to for-profit, private-sector
entities) shall be required to submit the form titled "Non-Federal
Funding Certification For Hydrogen Research And Development Under
Hydrogen Future Act Of 1996." This form is available as an attachment to
this Solicitation in IIPS for review by prospective Applicants.

The \"Cost Sharing\" definition is contained in 10 CFR 600.30, 600.101,
600.123, 600.224, and OMB Circular A-110. Foregone fee or profit by the
Applicant shall not be considered Cost Sharing under any resulting
Award. Reimbursement of actual costs will only include those costs that
are reasonable, allowable and allocable to the Project as determined in
accordance with the applicable cost principles prescribed in 10 CFR
600.127 and 10 CFR 600.224 for the respective Participants.

### Federally Funded Research and Development Centers

Applications submitted by Federally Funded Research and Development
Centers (FFRDCs) and DOE national laboratories (DOE laboratories are
FFRDCs), as defined by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 35.017, will
not be considered for Award. The FAR can be obtained electronically at
<http://www.arnet.gov/far/>.

Applications proposing a portion of the work to be performed by a FFRDC
will be considered for Award. However, a FFRDC cannot perform an effort
that exceeds 50% of the total project cost, including all Cost Share. If
an Application proposing work by a FFRDC is selected for funding, DOE
may make an Award to the Applicant for its portion of the effort and may
provide direct funding to the FFRDC for its portion of the effort. The
FFRDC effort, therefore, may not be accomplished through a subcontract
with an Applicant, as defined in 10 CFR Part 600.3. The Applicant must
execute an agreement with the FFRDC, and the Applicant will be the
responsible authority, without recourse to the Government, regarding the
settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and administrative
issues, including, but not limited to, disputes and claims arising out
of any agreement between the Applicant and the FFRDC.

If selected for the negotiation of an Award, the Applicant will be
responsible for securing the written approval of the cognizant Federal
Contracting Officer for any work proposed by a FFRDC.

The portion of work designated for any research laboratory that is
funded directly by DOE [would]{.underline} count as DOE funding, and
[would]{.underline} require any matching Cost Sharing by the Applicant.
Also see "Cost Sharing" above.

### Sub-Awards to Debarred and Suspended Parties

Applicants and Participants, at any tier, cannot make any sub-award or
permit any sub-award to any party which is debarred, suspended, or
otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal
Assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, \"Debarment and
Suspension,\" or is otherwise ineligible hereunder. The list of parties
excluded from Federal procurement and non-procurement programs can be
accessed through the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) at
[http://epls.arnet.gov](http://epls.arnet.gov/).

### National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Requirements

If selected for negotiation of an award, an Applicant will be required
to complete an Environmental Checklist electronically through the Golden
Field Office NEPA Compliance Form EF-1 Submission Website at
<http://www.goldenwba.doe.gov/nepa_user> . Do not complete the checklist
unless instructed to do so by DOE.

The Environmental Checklist is a series of questions designed to gather
information in the following general areas as related to the proposed
Project: chemicals, waste generation, emissions, permitting, natural
resources and any unique or controversial issues. The requested
information will be used by DOE to evaluate any potential impacts
(positive and negative) on the environment and should contain enough
detail for the Department to meet its requirements under NEPA.

Applicants are restricted from taking any irreversible action prior to
DOE reaching a final NEPA decision regarding the proposed Project.
Irreversible actions include demolition of existing buildings, site
clearing, ground breaking, construction, and/or site specific detailed
design. Provided DOE has authorized the work, this restriction does not
preclude the Applicant from developing plans and preliminary designs, or
performing other necessary support work prior to DOE reaching its final
NEPA decision.

## III. [APPLICATION PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS]{.underline} {#iii.-application-preparation-instructions .unnumbered}

### General

The Preliminary and Final Applications shall be submitted through IIPS
at [http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/), in accordance
with the instructions provided in Appendix B. Multiple Applications for
different projects may be submitted under this Solicitation.

To aid in the evaluation, Applications shall be clearly and concisely
written, as well as being indexed and logically assembled. The
Application shall be formatted for 8.5" x 11" sheets with 1" margins,
have a font size [not]{.underline} smaller than 10 point, and must
adhere to page limitations. Page limitations refer to files and all
associated documents when printed in their entirety.

The first six IIPS file attachments, as outlined separately below for
the Preliminary and Final Applications, must be submitted in MS Word for
PCs. Files not created in MS Word must be converted to MS Word for PCs
in order to be submitted. These files should not contain any graphics.

All supplemental graphics or supporting documentation (i.e., maps,
schematics, pictures, etc.) should be referenced in the text, converted
to pdf files (such as Adobe Acrobat), and be included as the remaining
four IIPS file attachments. As discussed below, only the Final
Application is allowed to have these file attachments.

Compressed files and paper copies will not be accepted. All files must
be prepared per the instructions herein, prior to beginning
transmission. Computer file sizes shall be kept to a minimum to reduce
transmission times.

The necessary Application forms, such as the Application for Federal
Assistance (Standard Form 424), Federal Assistance Budget Information
(DOE F 4600.4), and other forms, are provided as attachments on the
"Solicitation Form" page in IIPS. Forms may also be obtained from the
DOE Golden Field Office Home Page at
<http://www.go.doe.gov/businessopportunities.html>, under "Proposal
Forms."

### B. Preliminary Application Content {#b.-preliminary-application-content .unnumbered}

For the Preliminary Application, the file name(s) should be consistent
with the following structure: 1) last seven alpha-numeric digits of the
Solicitation number (i.e., GO93007); 2) Applicant name (shortened); 3)
Abbreviated title or form number (i.e., SF424 or Narr). Each segment
should be separated by a dash.

*[IIPS Label]{.underline} [Sample File Name]{.underline}*

Application for Federal Assistance GO93007-MyCompany-SF424.doc

Certifications and Assurances Not to be used with Preliminary
Application

Project Summary Not to be used with Preliminary Application

Narrative GO93007-MyCompany-Narr.doc

Budget Not to be used with Preliminary Application

Budget Narrative Not to be used with Preliminary Application

Attachment 1 Not to be used with Preliminary Application

Attachment 2 Not to be used with Preliminary Application

Attachment 3 Not to be used with Preliminary Application

Attachment 4 Not to be used with Preliminary Application

**NOTE: Any pages that exceed the specified maximum number of pages for
any item will be removed and will not be considered during the
evaluation.**

1)  [Application for Federal Assistance" (Form SF 424)]{.underline}

The Application for Federal Assistance, Standard Form 424, must
accompany the Preliminary Application. The required information must be
completed with the name of the individual authorized to sign the form
typed in the signature block.

2)  [Certifications and Assurances]{.underline}

> This information is [not]{.underline} to be submitted with the
> Preliminary Application.

3)  [Project Summary]{.underline}

This information is [not]{.underline} to be submitted with the
Preliminary Application.

4)  [Narrative]{.underline}

> A Narrative is required for the Preliminary Application. The Narrative
> shall be structured in accordance with the criteria and requirements
> specified below.

5)  [Budget ("Federal Assistance Budget Information," Form DOE F
    4600.4)]{.underline}

> This information is [not]{.underline} to be submitted with the
> Preliminary Application.

6)  [Budget Narrative (Form GO-PF20)]{.underline}

> This information is [not]{.underline} to be submitted with the
> Preliminary Application.

7)  [Attachment 1]{.underline}

> The Preliminary Application shall not include any Attachments.

8)  [Attachment 2]{.underline}

> The Preliminary Application shall not include any Attachments.

9)  [Attachment 3]{.underline}

> The Preliminary Application shall not include any Attachments.

10) [Attachment 4]{.underline}

> The Preliminary Application shall not include any Attachments.

**Narrative Structure**

The Narrative shall consist of the following sections, with page limits
where indicated. The file must be submitted in MS Word for PCs.

NOTE: Any pages that exceed the specified maximum number of pages for
any item will be removed and will not be considered during the
evaluation.

> a\) [Cover Page (one-page limit)]{.underline}
>
> The Narrative cover page must indicate the name and type of
> organization, the Solicitation Number, the Topic and Sub-Topic (if
> applicable) being addressed, the project title, and both the technical
> and business points of contact for the Applicant, denoting the names,
> titles, addresses, telephone and facsimile numbers, and electronic
> mail addresses. The cover page should also identify the name and type
> of organization for key Participants, along with names, titles,
> addresses, telephone and facsimile numbers, and electronic mail
> addresses of Participant contacts.
>
> b\) [Technical Summary (one-page limit)]{.underline}
>
> A one-page technical summary shall be included in the Narrative to
> describe the proposed Project in technical terms and explain how the
> proposed Project will work toward the achievement of the targets and
> objectives in Appendix C. The name of the Applicant and title of the
> proposed project shall be indicated at the top of the summary page.
>
> c\) [Technical Proposal (5-page limit)]{.underline}

The Technical Proposal portion of the Narrative for the Preliminary
Application shall be structured in accordance with the Sections
indicated below (the structure, order of contents, etc., within a
Section are at the discretion of the Applicant). The Applicant must
specify the Topic and Sub-Topic (if applicable) that are being
addressed. This file [must]{.underline} be submitted in MS Word for PCs
format.

For the Preliminary Application, it is not necessarily expected by DOE
that final teaming arrangements will be complete. If the team is not
fully committed, then the Applicant must describe the anticipated
teaming arrangement. The teaming arrangements and all commitments must
be finalized prior to the submittal of Final Applications by those
Applicants progressing beyond the Preliminary Application stage.

**Applicants must review Section IV.D, "Evaluation Criteria for
Preliminary Application," to be certain that the Evaluation Criteria are
adequately covered in the Technical Proposal.**

> [PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL PROPOSAL]{.underline}
>
> Section I: Technical Concept and Approach
>
> Section II: Technology Impact
>
> Describe how the project will enable achievement of the
> Topic/Sub-Topic targets as described in Appendix C.
>
> Section III: Work Plan
>
> Include a milestone chart with GO/NO-GO decision points.
>
> Section IV: Resource Requirements
>
> A summary table showing proposed cost share, by year, must be included
> for the DOE share and the Applicant share.

To avoid duplication of current projects in the Topic areas with a
proposed project under this Solicitation, information regarding current
projects is available at
[www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells](http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells)
.

### C. Final Application Content {#c.-final-application-content .unnumbered}

For the Final Application, the file name(s) should be consistent with
the following structure: 1) last seven alpha-numeric digits of the
Solicitation number (i.e., GO930007); 2) Applicant name (shortened); 3)
Abbreviated title or form number (i.e., SF424, Projsum, Narr, DOE4600.4,
GOPF20 or Att1, Att2, Att3, Att4). Each segment should be separated by a
dash.

*[IIPS Label]{.underline} [Sample File Name]{.underline}*

Application for Federal Assistance Not required unless changed from
Preliminary

Certifications and Assurances Only required if selected for Award

Project Summary GO93007-MyCompany-Projsum.doc

Narrative GO93007-MyCompany-Narr.doc

Budget GO93007-MyCompany-DOE4600-4.doc

Budget Narrative Only required if selected for Award

Attachment 1 GO93007-MyCompany-AttachmentName.pdf

Attachment 2 GO93007-MyCompany-AttachmentName.pdf

Attachment 3 GO93007-MyCompany-AttachmentName.pdf

Attachment 4 GO93007-MyCompany-AttachmentName.pdf

Failure to respond or follow the instructions regarding the order and
content of the Application may result in the Application being deemed
non-responsive, or result in an overall lower score.

**NOTE: Any pages that exceed the specified maximum number of pages for
any item will be removed and will not be considered during the
evaluation.**

1)  ["Application for Federal Assistance" (Form SF 424)]{.underline}

If changed from the Preliminary Application, the Application for Federal
Assistance, Standard Form 424, must accompany the Final Application. The
required information must be completed with the name of the individual
authorized to sign the form typed in the signature block.

2)  [Certifications and Assurances]{.underline}

> This information is [not]{.underline} required to be submitted with
> the Final Application. However, the following forms will be requested
> by DOE from those Applicants selected for negotiation of an award.

a\) \"Financial Assistance Pre-Award Information Sheet\" (GO-PF19)

b\) \"U.S. DOE Assurance of Compliance\" (DOE F 1600.5)

c)  \"Grantee Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension
    and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace
    Requirements\" (FA-CERTS)

d)  \"Disclosure of Lobbying Activities\" (SF-LLL) (Complete only if the
    second block in Section 1 of FA/CERTS is checked; otherwise, leave
    blank.)

e)  Environmental Checklist -- See Section II above.

f)  ACH Vendor/Miscellaneous Payment Enrollment Form, Standard Form 3881

g)  Non-Federal Funding Certification For Hydrogen Research And
    Development Under Hydrogen Future Act Of 1996 (if applicable).

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
3)  [Project Summary (2-page limit)]{.underline}

A two-page technical summary must be submitted with the Final
Application describing, in general terms, the proposed Project, the
Topic and Sub-Topic (if applicable) being addressed, and how the
proposed Project will work toward the achievement of the targets and
objectives in Appendix C. Describe the role of each project participant.
The summary must only contain information that is releasable to the
public. This file must be submitted in MS Word for PCs.

4)  [Narrative]{.underline}

> The Narrative shall be structured in accordance with the criteria and
> requirements specified below.

5)  [Budget ("Federal Assistance Budget Information," Form DOE F
    4600.4)]{.underline}

> A summary of all cost data shall be submitted on this form. Total
> project costs (sum of Applicant, other participants' and DOE cost
> shares) must be included.

6)  [Budget Narrative (Form GO-PF20)]{.underline}

> This information is [not]{.underline} required to be submitted with
> the Final Application. The GO-PF20 form will be requested by DOE from
> those Applicants selected for negotiation of an Award.

7)  [Attachment 1 -- Optional - For Applicant Use (10-page
    limit)]{.underline}

> Attachments may be included, if deemed necessary by the Applicant, to
> further clarify key aspects of the proposed work and associated
> technology. The attachments shall [not]{.underline} include additional
> explanatory text prepared expressly for this Solicitation (all such
> material is limited to the Technical Proposal section of the Narrative
> described below). Allowable attachments include items such as
> graphics, technical papers presented at prior conferences, patent
> cover sheets, process flow sheets, equipment drawings, electrical
> schematics, company informational brochures, maps, layout drawings,
> etc. At least one reference to each attachment and any associated
> explanation shall be included in the Technical Proposal section.
> Attachments must be submitted in MS Word for PCs [or]{.underline} pdf
> format.
>
> The documents may be included in one, two, three, or four Attachment
> files in accordance with the IIPS Labels. The page limit for
> Attachment 1 noted above is the total cumulative pages allowed in up
> to four separate Attachment files (the page limit, however, does not
> include letters of commitment and cost sharing or resumes, as
> described below).

8)  [Attachment 2 -- Optional -- For Applicant Use]{.underline}

> See requirements and page limit under Attachment 1 above.

9)  [Attachment 3 -- Optional - For Applicant Use]{.underline}

> See requirements and page limit under Attachment 1 above.

10) [Attachment 4 -- Optional - For Applicant Use]{.underline}

> See requirements and page limit under Attachment 1 above.

**Narrative Structure**

The Narrative shall consist of the following sections, with page limits
where indicated in the descriptions below. All files [must]{.underline}
be submitted in MS Word for PCs [or]{.underline} pdf format unless
indicated otherwise in the description for the section.

\- Cover Page

\- Table of Contents

-   Technical Summary

-   Technical Proposal

-   Resources by Task

-   Letters of Commitment and Cost Sharing

-   Personnel Resumes

**NOTE**: Any pages that exceed the specified maximum number of pages
below for any item will be removed and will not be considered during the
evaluation.

> a\) [Cover Page (one-page limit)]{.underline}
>
> The Narrative cover page must indicate the name and type of
> organization, the Solicitation Number, the Topic and Sub-Topic (if
> applicable) being addressed, the project title, and both the technical
> and business points of contact for the Applicant, denoting the names,
> titles, addresses, telephone and facsimile numbers, and electronic
> mail addresses. The cover page should also identify the name and type
> of organization for key Participants, along with names, titles,
> addresses, telephone and facsimile, and electronic mail addresses of
> Participant contacts. This file must be submitted in MS Word for PCs
> format.
>
> b\) [Table of Contents (no page limit)]{.underline}
>
> The Narrative shall include a table of contents and page numbers
> corresponding to the elements outlined herein. The Table of Contents
> does not have a page limit. This file must be submitted in MS Word for
> PCs format.
>
> c\) [Technical Summary (one-page limit)]{.underline}
>
> A one-page technical summary shall be included in the Narrative to
> describe the proposed Project in technical terms and explain the
> proposed Project benefits. The summary may contain information that is
> not releasable to the public. It is intended for use by technical
> evaluators. The name of the Applicant and title of the proposed
> project shall be indicated at the top of the summary page. This file
> must be submitted in MS Word for PCs format.
>
> d\) [Technical Proposal (15-page limit)]{.underline}
>
> The Technical Proposal portion of the Narrative shall be structured in
> accordance with the following Sections (the structure, order of
> contents, etc., within a Section are at the discretion of the
> Applicant).
>
> [TECHNICAL PROPOSAL]{.underline}
>
> Section I: Scientific and Technical Merit

A.  Technical Concept

> Include a critical review of the current state of the art for the
> proposed technology and competing technologies, and a discussion of
> the technical feasibility of the concept identifying the critical
> targets and barriers to be overcome. Describe how the project will
> enable meeting the technical targets in Appendix C for the Topic or
> Sub-Topic.

B.  Work Plan and Statement of Objectives

> Include the project goals, scope, and objectives, work breakdown by
> objectives or tasks including the roles of each organization
> participating in the project, a milestone plan and schedule, decision
> points and GO/NO-GO criteria.
>
> The Application [must]{.underline} describe how the project technology
> will advance progress from the current status toward technical targets
> in Appendix C for the Topic or Sub-Topic being proposed. Each
> Application must also include an economic and energy analysis task at
> the end of the first phase based on the results of the analysis. The
> analysis should focus on the potential of the technology to meet the
> specific technical targets and requirements described in the Topic or
> Sub-Topic. On Topics or Sub-Topics pertaining to technical-economic
> analysis, a Go/No-Go decision will be made after completion of the
> first year of work.. This analysis must be updated at the end of the
> project based on the final results and included in the final project
> report.
>
> Section II: Project Management and Facilities

A.  Project Management

> Include the overall project management plan and responsibilities, task
> integration and project coordination, management structure and
> philosophy, teaming approach and commitment.

B.  Facilities

> Describe the facilities and equipment that will be utilized to carry
> out the project.
>
> Section III: Personnel and Organization Qualifications
>
> Include related experience of the Applicant and other organizations on
> previous research projects of similar size, scope, and complexity and
> success in completing similar work successfully.

**Applicants must also review Section IV.D, "Evaluation Criteria for
Final Application," to be certain that all aspects of the Evaluation
Criteria are adequately covered in the Technical Proposal.**

This file must be submitted in MS Word for PCs format.

e\) [Resources by Task (5-page limit)]{.underline}

The Narrative shall include a summary of resources by Statement of
Objectives task. The summary must include the following for the
Applicant and each participant:

-   The job title and estimated number of hours for each of the key
    personnel proposed by task.

-   The estimated travel budget by task.

-   The total proposed equipment, materials, and supplies budget by
    task, with a list by task of each item over \$5,000.

> This file must be submitted in MS Word for PCs format.
>
> f\) [Letters of Commitment and Cost Sharing (two-page limit for each
> letter; no limit to number of letters)]{.underline}
>
> The Narrative should include Letters of Commitment from team members,
> major subcontractors, and other Project Participants to demonstrate
> that the proposed cost share will be provided and all aspects of the
> proposed Project scope will be conducted as described by the
> Applicant. Each letter is limited to a maximum of two pages.
>
> This file may be submitted in MS Word for PCs or, if scanned, letters
> of commitment and cost sharing must be in pdf format. This file should
> be included as one of the four Attachment files rather than with the
> Narrative file (these letters will not count against the Attachment
> page limit).

g\) [Personnel Resumes (two-page limit for each resume; no limit to
number of resumes)]{.underline}

The Narrative should include resumes for Key Personnel only for the
Applicant and major Participants. Each resume is limited to a maximum of
two pages.

This file may be submitted in MS Word for PCs or, if scanned, personnel
resumes must be in pdf format. This file should be included as one of
the four Attachment files rather than with the Narrative file (these
resumes will not count against the Attachment page limit).

### Proprietary Application Information

Applications submitted in response to this Solicitation may contain
trade secrets and/or privileged or confidential commercial or financial
information which the Applicant does not want to be used or disclosed
for any purpose other than evaluation of the Application. The use and
disclosure of such data may be restricted, provided the Applicant marks
the cover sheet of the Application with the following legend, specifying
the pages of the Application which are to be restricted in accordance
with the conditions of the legend:

\"The data contained in pages \_\_\_\_\_ of this Application have been
submitted in confidence and contain trade secrets or proprietary
information, and such data shall be used or disclosed only for
evaluation purposes, provided that if this Applicant receives an Award
as a result of or in connection with the submission of this Application,
DOE shall have the right to use or disclose the data herein to the
extent provided in the Award. This restriction does not limit the
government\'s right to use or disclose data obtained without restriction
from any source, including the Applicant.\"

Further, to protect such data, each page containing such data shall be
specifically identified and marked, including each line or paragraph
containing the data to be protected with a legend similar to the
following:

\"Use or disclosure of the data set forth above is subject to the
restriction on the cover page of this Application.\"

It should be noted, however, that data bearing the aforementioned legend
may be subject to release under the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), if DOE or a court determines that the material
so marked is not exempt under the FOIA. The Government assumes no
liability for disclosure or use of unmarked data and may use such data
for any purpose.

Applicants are hereby notified that DOE intends to make all Applications
submitted available to non-Government personnel (private industry, as
well as research laboratory personnel) for the sole purpose of assisting
DOE in its evaluation of the Applications. These individuals will be
required to protect the confidentiality of any specifically identified
proprietary information obtained as a result of their participation in
the evaluation.

### E. If Selected For Award {#e.-if-selected-for-award .unnumbered}

If a Final Application is selected for negotiation of an award,
additional information may be requested by DOE in writing. The request
will specify the documents to be submitted, and to whom they must be
submitted. DOE reserves the right to void/deselect an Application if the
information requested is not received within the prescribed timeframe.

As a minimum, DOE will request additional information submittals prior
to an Award including:

> \(1\) Items noted in Section III.C above as needed only if selected
> for the negotiation of an Award.

(2) Financial information from the Applicant and any Participant(s)
    providing a source of Cost Sharing or performing work. The financial
    information should be outlined and supported in accordance with the
    following.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
a)  If requested by DOE, Annual financial statements (balance sheet and
    income and expense statement) for the past year from the Applicant
    and Participants providing Cost Sharing and/or performing work.
    Where available, financial statements prepared by certified public
    accountants should be submitted. State and local governments and
    public universities are exempt from providing financial statements.

b)  In order to qualify for a Financial Assistance Award, the Applicant
    must demonstrate a financial management system that satisfies 10 CFR
    600.121 and 600.220 by describing the system's ability to comply.

## IV. [EVALUATION OF APPLICATIONS]{.underline} {#iv.-evaluation-of-applications .unnumbered}

### A. Compliance Review {#a.-compliance-review .unnumbered}

A compliance review will be performed to check the Preliminary and Final
Application packages for compliance with forms and page limits, and its
responsiveness to the requirements of the Solicitation. If a
demonstrated effort to complete all forms is ascertained from
information provided, but minimal information has been omitted, the
Applicant may be contacted to provide the omitted information. To be
considered, the requested information must be submitted promptly, prior
to commencement of the comprehensive evaluation. Failure to respond or
follow the instructions regarding the order and content of the
Application may result in an Application being deemed non-responsive, or
result in an overall lower score.

### B. Minimum Qualifications {#b.-minimum-qualifications .unnumbered}

Minimum qualifications for the Preliminary and Final Applications
include fulfillment of the minimum required Applicant cost share
contribution (see Section II.I), fulfillment of the Eligibility
Requirements (see Section II.A), and a proposed project Scope of
Objectives that is within the areas of consideration indicated for this
Solicitation (see Section I.C). If the Minimum Qualifications are not
met, the Application shall not be evaluated or considered for Award.

### C. Comprehensive Evaluations {#c.-comprehensive-evaluations .unnumbered}

Comprehensive evaluations of Preliminary and Final Applications will be
performed in accordance with 10 CFR Part 600.13 as implemented by the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy in procedures published in the Federal Register on December 20,
2001. In undertaking these comprehensive evaluations, DOE reserves the
right to use any assistance deemed advisable, in accordance with
applicable regulations, including qualified personnel from other Federal
agencies, other Government entities, universities, industry, and DOE
contractors. These individuals will be required to protect the
confidentiality of any specifically identified trade secrets and/or
privileged or confidential commercial or financial information obtained
as a result of their participation in this evaluation. Information
contained in the Applications shall be treated in accordance with the
policies and procedures set forth in 10 CFR Part 600.15. Submission of
an Application constitutes consent to the use of outside evaluators by
DOE.

DOE reserves the right to provide Financial Assistance to all, none, or
certain parts of the Application(s) submitted in response to this
Solicitation. All Applicants will be notified in writing of the action
taken on their Applications. The status of any Application during the
comprehensive evaluation and selection process will not be discussed
with Applicant(s).

A two-step comprehensive evaluation process will be used by DOE for
Applications submitted under this Solicitation. The first step will
include the Applicant submittal of brief Preliminary Applications that
will be evaluated by DOE based on criteria specified in Section IV.D,
Evaluation Criteria for Preliminary Application. As a result of this
initial evaluation, each Applicant will either be requested to submit a
Final Application package or be removed from the competition. In either
case, a letter of explanation will be provided to each Applicant. The
second evaluation step will include comprehensive technical merit
reviews of the Final Application packages based on criteria specified in
Section IV.D, Evaluation Criteria for Final Application.

### D. Evaluation Criteria for Comprehensive Evaluations {#d.-evaluation-criteria-for-comprehensive-evaluations .unnumbered}

The objective merit review criteria establish what DOE considers to be
the determining factors for award. Project cost will not be point
scored, but it will be used in the comprehensive evaluation process. The
objective merit review criteria listed in the table below will be used
by evaluators to determine the value of the Application in meeting the
objectives of the Solicitation. The evaluation weights for the objective
merit review criteria are shown as percents for each criterion.

**[EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS]{.underline}**

The following evaluation criteria will be used in the comprehensive
evaluation of Preliminary Applications. For each criterion, the
weighting (out of a total of 100) is indicated to show the relative
importance.

1\. **Technical Concept and Approach (Weight: 35)**

> For the proposed Topic or Sub-Topic from Appendix C, the overall
> relevance and applicability of the technical concept and approach
> under the requirements of this Solicitation; the degree to which the
> proposed project will advance achievement of technical targets
> described.

2\. **Technology Impact (Weight: 35)**

> The degree to which the proposed project will enable the achievement
> of the targets and objectives for the Topic or Sub-Topic as defined in
> Appendix C, the uniqueness of the proposed technology, and
> minimization of overlap with completed and on-going projects.

3\. **Work Plan (Weight: 30)**

> Appropriateness of the work plan, schedule, milestones, and decision
> points for the proposed project.

4\. **Resource Requirements (not weighted)**

> For DOE information, provide a summary table, by year, showing
> proposed cost share for DOE and the Applicant.

Scores and rankings under the preliminary review will be discarded and
not used for evaluation of the Final Applications.

**[EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR FINAL APPLICATIONS]{.underline}**

The following evaluation criteria will be used in the comprehensive
evaluation of Final Applications. For each criterion, the weighting (out
of a total of 100) is indicated to show the relative importance.

1\. **Scientific and Technical Merit (Overall Weight: 50, with
sub-criteria weights as shown below)**

> a\. **Technical Concept (Weight: 30)**

For the proposed Topic or Sub-Topic from Appendix C, the overall
relevance of the technical concept, including a concise project
overview/discussion of the goals, objectives, and barriers; the
feasibility of the proposed technical approach and soundness of the
research program to enable achievement of the technical objectives and
targets of the Topic or Sub-Topic in Appendix C; the identification and
discussion of the major issues related to the investigation and the key
risk areas of the technology application; and the degree to which the
proposed system advances the technology and achievement of technical
targets described.

> b\. **Work Plan/Statement of Objectives (Weight: 20)**
>
> The soundness and likelihood of success of the proposed research
> approach, goals, and objectives; the feasibility of the approach to
> resolve the major issues and achieve the technical goals; the
> advantages of the proposed approach compared to alternatives; the
> adequacy and reasonableness of the work breakdown structure and
> performance and cost schedules, including decision points and
> performance-based progress measures; the adequacy of the intermediate
> and major milestones; the extent to which the deliverables clearly
> exhibit advancement of the state-of-the art of these technologies
> toward eventual commercial viability; a milestone chart is included to
> clearly indicate key milestones and decision points.

2\. **Project Management and Facilities (Overall Weight: 30, with
sub-criteria weights as shown below)**

a\. **Project Management (Weight: 20)**

> The adequacy of the proposed project organization to facilitate
> project success; the commitment of the team members; the clarity of
> the roles of the team members; the approach to managing the Team; the
> interest of Applicant management and the priority the Applicant and
> team members will place on the proposed work; the assistance that will
> be provided in any specialty area required to solve specific problems.
>
> b\. **Facilities (Weight: 10)**
>
> The adequacy of the Applicant's proposed facilities, and those of
> subcontractors proposed; the commitment to use those facilities for
> the proposed program; and the reasonableness of any request for new
> facilities and/or equipment.

3\. **Personnel and Organization Qualifications (Weight: 20)**

> **Technical and Business Skills**
>
> The adequacy of the education, professional training,
> technical/business-related skills, and work experience of the
> principal investigator (PI) and other key personnel, including major
> subcontractors, on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to
> the Topic or Sub-Topic proposed; the level and reasonableness of the
> time commitment of the PI and other key personnel, including major
> subcontractors, assigned to the proposed program. The adequacy of the
> Applicant's proposed team to address all aspects of the proposed work;
> relevant experience of each organization on the Applicant team and
> success in performing similar projects.

For the Final Application, the proposed cost elements will not be point
scored or adjectivally rated. However, they will be evaluated to
determine if the total proposed amount is commensurate with the proposed
effort. Also, the proposed cost will be evaluated to ascertain that the
Applicant has met the cost sharing requirements specified in the
Solicitation. As previously indicated, **those Applications not meeting
the minimum cost sharing requirements specified in this Solicitation
will be eliminated from further consideration in the initial Compliance
Review and will not be technically evaluated**.

The proposed cost elements may also be used during the comprehensive
evaluation to assist evaluators in judging the Application.

### E. Program Policy Factors {#e.-program-policy-factors .unnumbered}

After the comprehensive evaluations are completed for all Final
Applications, DOE will apply Program Policy Factors. The purpose of
considering these factors is to maximize the effective use of available
Government funding. These factors will be considered by the Selection
Official to ensure that the program, as a whole, meets the goals of the
Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cell, and Infrastructure Technologies and is
consistent with the EERE mission. The factors to be applied to the
eligible Final Applications are:

1.  Selection of Applications to achieve a balance of complementary
    projects, in conjunction with existing projects funded by the DOE
    Office of Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and Infrastructure Technologies
    Program, to meet the overall goals and objectives of that Program.

2.  Selection of projects involving a diversity (types and sizes) of
    proposing organizations and technologies.

3.  Selection of Applications with Applicant cost share above the
    minimum level required.

4.  Geographic distribution of Applicants within the U.S.

## V. [ADDITIONAL INFORMATION]{.underline} {#v.-additional-information .unnumbered}

### A. Clarifications {#a.-clarifications .unnumbered}

DOE may require Applications to be clarified or supplemented to the
extent considered necessary for evaluation, either through additional
submissions or oral presentations.

### B. Debriefing After Selections {#b.-debriefing-after-selections .unnumbered}

Unsuccessful Applicants will be provided the strengths and weaknesses of
their Applications in writing from DOE. This shall be considered the
debriefing.

## APPENDIX A -- DEFINITIONS {#appendix-a-definitions .unnumbered}

**"Amendment"** means a revision to a solicitation.

\"**Applicant**\" means the legal entity or individual signing the
Application. This entity or individual may be one organization or a
single entity representing a group of organizations (such as a
Consortium) that has chosen to submit a single Application in response
to a solicitation.

\"**Application**\" means the documentation submitted in response to a
solicitation. NOTE: 'Application' is referred to as 'Proposal' in IIPS.

\"**Award**\" means the written documentation executed by a DOE
Contracting Officer, after an Applicant is selected, which contains the
negotiated terms and conditions for providing Financial Assistance to
the Applicant. A Financial Assistance Award may be either a Grant or a
Cooperative Agreement.

\"**Budget**\" means the cost expenditure plan submitted in the
Application, including both the DOE contribution [and]{.underline} the
Applicant Cost Share.

\"**Budget Period**\" means an interval of time, specified in the Award,
into which a Project is divided for budgeting purposes.

\"**Consortium (plural consortia)**\" means the group of organizations
or individuals that have chosen to submit a single Application in
response to a solicitation.

\"**Contracting Officer**\" means the DOE official authorized to execute
Awards on behalf of DOE and who is responsible for the business
management and non-program aspects of the Financial Assistance process.

\"**Cooperative Agreement**\" means a Financial Assistance instrument
used by DOE to transfer money or property when the principal purpose of
the transaction is to accomplish a public purpose of support or
stimulation authorized by Federal statute, and Substantial Involvement
(see definition below) is anticipated between DOE and the Applicant
during the performance of the contemplated activity.

\"**Cost Sharing**\" means the respective share of Total Project Costs
required to be contributed by the Applicant and by DOE. The required
percentage of Applicant Cost Share is to be applied to the Total Project
Cost (i.e., the sum of Applicant plus DOE Cost Shares) rather than to
the DOE contribution alone.

**"Deliverable"** is a product defined in the Application to be prepared
and provided to DOE. Deliverables are the basis of schedule and budget
estimates and project monitoring and control functions.

\"**Financial Assistance**\" means the transfer of money or property to
an Applicant or Participant to accomplish a public purpose of support
authorized by Federal statute through Grants or Cooperative Agreements
and sub-awards. In DOE, it does not include direct loans, loan
guarantees, price guarantees, purchase agreements, Cooperative Research
and Development Agreements (CRADAs), or any other type of financial
incentive instrument.

**"Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC)"** means a
research laboratory as defined by Federal Acquisition Regulation 35.017.

**"DOE"** is the United States Department of Energy.

**"GFO"** or **"GO"** is the DOE Golden Field Office.

**\"Grant\"** means a Financial Assistance instrument used by DOE to
transfer money or property when the principal purpose of the transaction
is to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized
by Federal statute, and no Substantial Involvement is anticipated
between DOE and the Applicant during the performance of the contemplated
activity.

**"Hydrogen Infrastructure"** is hydrogen supply (production and/or
transport and delivery) and storage, vehicle refueling, and
infrastructure operation and maintenance.

**"Hydrogen Production"** refers to hydrogen that can be produced from a
variety of feedstocks utilizing a variety of different process
technologies. Feedstock options include fossil resources such as coal,
natural gas, and petroleum, and renewable resources such as biomass and
water. Process technologies include thermochemical, biological,
electrolytic and photolytic.

**"Industry Interactive Procurement System (IIPS)"** is the DOE
Internet-based procurement system which allows access to the DOE
business opportunities database, user registration, and submittal of
Applications. See <http://e-center.doe.gov/> .

\"**Key Personnel**\" means the individuals who will have significant
roles in planning and implementation of the proposed Project on the part
of the Applicant and Participants, including FFRDCs.

**"kW"** means Kilowatt.

**"Pilot Scale"** is defined as one-hundredth to one-tenth of a
full-scale component or system.

\"**Project**\" means the set of activities described in an Application,
State plan, or other document that is approved by DOE for Financial
Assistance (whether such Financial Assistance represents all or only a
portion of the support necessary to carry out those activities).

\"**Project Period**\" means the total period of time indicated in an
Award during which DOE expects to provide support contingent upon
satisfactory progress and available funds. A Project Period may consist
of one or more Budget Periods and may be extended by DOE.

**"Project Team Participant"** is an industrial, government, or other
member of the proposed team.

**"Proposal"** is the term used in IIPS meaning the documentation
submitted in response to a solicitation. See also Application.

\"**Recipient**\" means the organization, individual, or other entity
that receives a Financial Assistance Award from DOE and is financially
accountable for the use of any DOE funds or property provided for the
performance of the Project, and is legally responsible for carrying out
the terms and conditions of the award.

\"**Selection**\" means the determination by the DOE Selection Official
that negotiations take place for certain Projects with the intent of
awarding a Financial Assistance instrument.

**\"Selection Official\"** means the DOE official designated to select
Applications for negotiation toward Award under a solicitation.

**"SOO"** means Statement of Objectives.

\"**Substantial Involvement**\" means involvement on the part of the
government. DOE\'s involvement may include: shared responsibility for
the performance of the Project; providing technical assistance or
guidance which the Applicant is required to follow; and the right to
intervene in the conduct or performance of the Project. Such involvement
will be negotiated with each Applicant prior to signing any agreement.

**"Technology Validation"** is defined as confirmation that components
meeting the technical requirements for a given technology have been
incorporated into a system, and both system performance and operation
requirements are met under real world conditions outside of research
laboratories.

\"**Total Project Cost**\" means all the funds required to complete the
effort proposed by the Applicant, including DOE funds (including direct
funding of any FFRDC) plus all other funds that will be committed by the
Applicant as Cost Sharing.

## APPENDIX B -- INDUSTRY INTERACTIVE PROCUREMENT SYSTEM (IIPS) {#appendix-b-industry-interactive-procurement-system-iips .unnumbered}

**FOR HELP, CONTACT THE IIPS HELP DESK AT 1-800-683-0751 (SELECT
OPTION 1) OR AT <IIPS_HELPDESK@E-CENTER.DOE.GOV>**

1.  [Locate Solicitation]{.underline}

-   Go to the IIPS website at
    [http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/) and click on
    "Browse Opportunities", or login in if you are already registered.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Click on any of the options for viewing the solicitation, whichever
    is easiest for you to locate the solicitation. (Viewing
    "Opportunities by Contracting Activity" is recommended.)

-   Click on "Enter IIPS".

-   Click on the \"Financial Assistance\" folder.

-   Click on the \"Golden Field Office\" folder.

-   Locate and click on the solicitation number.

-   Scroll to the bottom of the page, where you will find the attached
    solicitation.

2.  [IIPS Registration]{.underline}

An Applicant only has to register once on IIPS. This registration is
permanent and is used for all IIPS submissions. If the Applicant has
already registered, it should not register again. If an Applicant has
not previously registered, it is encouraged to register in IIPS at least
14 days prior to the Solicitation closing date. To register:

-   Go to the IIPS website at
    [http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/).

-   Click on the "Register" button.

-   Click on the box that says, "Check this box for Acquisitions greater
    than Simplified Acquisitions threshold or financial assistance" and
    then click on the radio button next to the "Register only" option.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Click on "Proceed to Form."

-   Read the "Notice of Disclaimer" and click on "I Accept" if you are
    in agreement. (Clicking on \"I Decline\" will return you to the main
    registration page.)

-   Complete the Registration Form. Also print this page, which contains
    your password, for future reference.

-   Click on "Submit Registration." Applicants will receive a
    confirmation of receipt of registration.

-   Applicants will also receive an email confirming successful
    registration. If an Applicant does not receive this email
    confirmation within one business day, contact the IIPS Help Desk.

After the applicant has registered, it is important to use the IIPS test
site at

<http://doe-iips.pr.doe.gov/iips/busopor.nsf/TestSolicitation?OpenView&login>.
This test site allows registered users the opportunity to practice
uploading/downloading files in IIPS. **Do not click on "Go to Main View"
to practice submitting applications, as this button takes you to the
live site.** To start the practice session, click on the folder next to
Financial Assistance, click on DE-FF02-03AA00000, then click on the
button that says "Click here to Login". If you are already logged in,
click on "Create Proposal". (You will not see the "Create Proposal"
button until you are logged in.)

3.  [Join Mailing List]{.underline}

It is highly recommended that Applicants join the mailing list.

-   To do so, go to \"Locate Solicitation\", click on the "Join Mailing
    List" button, enter the required information, and submit.

-   After an Applicant has joined the mailing list, the Applicant will
    receive an email each time a solicitation message is posted.

-   However, the Applicant should visit the solicitation page
    periodically to ensure receipt of the latest information.

######### [Electronic Submission]{.underline}

Applications [must]{.underline} be submitted through IIPS at
[http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/), in accordance with
the instructions in the solicitation. A submission by any other medium
will not be accepted.

4.  [Electronic Signature]{.underline}

Applications submitted through IIPS constitute submission of
electronically signed applications. The name of the authorized
organizational representative (i.e., the administrative official, who,
on behalf of the proposing organization, is authorized to commit the
Applicant to the conduct of a project) [must be typed in the signature
block]{.underline} on the form to be accepted as an electronic
signature.

5.  [Submit Application]{.underline}

Applicants are strongly encouraged to submit applications at least 48
hours prior to the deadline for submissions to ensure timely submission
and allow time to resolve any possible transmission problems. To submit
an application, follow these steps:

####  [Step 1 -- Prepare Application]{.underline} {#step-1-prepare-application .unnumbered}

-   All required files necessary for a complete Application package
    should be prepared in accordance with the instructions in the
    solicitation prior to starting the transmission process. Files
    should be completed, organized and named as instructed in Section
    III the part entitled "Application Content" before proceeding to
    submit an Application.

[Step 2 -- Create Application]{.underline}

-   Enter the IIPS website at
    [http://e-center.doe.gov](http://e-center.doe.gov/).

-   Click on the "Login" button.

-   Click on the radio button that says, "Industry Interactive
    Procurement System" and click on "Login" button again.

-   Enter your user name (as shown on your registration email
    confirmation) and password. Note: These are case sensitive.

-   The "View Opportunities as Sorted by:" screen will appear.

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Follow the directions in "Locate Solicitation." (Item 1.)

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
-   Click on the "Create Application" button and complete the
    information on the Application Cover Page. In order for DOE to
    accurately identify each application, Applicants must enter a unique
    project title in the "Subject" line.

-   Click on "Continue".

[Step 3 -- Attach Application]{.underline}

-   Click on "Attach Application".

-   Scroll to the bottom of the page and attach each file in the
    corresponding block on the page, as outlined in the solicitation,
    and then click on "Submit." Up to 10 files may be attached. Keep
    file sizes to a minimum to ensure a shorter transmission time. Be
    patient while your files upload.

-   IIPS will provide an acknowledgement.

-   Click on the link on the acknowledgement to "Verify Successful
    Transmission" of your application.

Once the Applicant [begins]{.underline} the \"Create Application\"
process, there will be a record created in IIPS. Therefore, Applicants
must verify that duplicate applications were not inadvertently created
in IIPS. If a duplicate was created, follow the steps outlined in 8.a.

**In the event that two or more Applications are received from the same
Applicant with the same unique project title, only the Application with
the EARLIEST transmission start time will be considered for review.**

6.  [Multiple Applications for Unique Projects]{.underline}

An Applicant may submit more than one application under the same
solicitation; however, each Application must be uniquely titled. For
each application, the Applicant is required to follow the instructions
in "Submit Application." Each application must be complete and shall
[not]{.underline} rely upon another application as submission of the
required documents.

7.  [Deletion of Applications]{.underline}

```{=html}
<!-- -->
```
a.  To delete an application (including all files) from IIPS:

> To delete or withdraw an application or an application file, contact
> the IIPS Help Desk requesting the application to be removed. The
> following information is required when requesting to have an
> application deleted:

a.  Registered User's Name as well as User Name of requestor (if
    different)

b.  Email address of the registered user as well as requester (if
    different)

c.  Company/University Name

d.  Complete Solicitation Number

e.  Complete Proposal Tracking Number

f.  Date Submitted (optional)

> In addition, if an application is deleted after the closing date,
> inform the Contract Specialist shown on the solicitation, via email.

b.  To submit a revised application:

> After the Help Desk has removed the requested application, follow the
> steps in \"Submit Application\" to submit a revised application (i.e.
> cover page and all required files).

c.  To submit a revised file:

> After the Help Desk has removed the requested file from your
> application:

-   Locate the solicitation.

-   Click on the yellow folder next to the solicitation number.

-   Click on the cover page of your submission, click on the \"Attach
    Application\" link, and attach the revised file. Files received past
    the due date will not be reviewed.

8.  [IIPS Questions]{.underline}

View the "IIPS Frequently Asked Questions" by clicking on the "Help"
button and scrolling to the bottom of the page. You may also contact the
IIPS Help Desk at 1-800-683-0751 (select Option 1) or at
<IIPS_HelpDesk@e-center.doe.gov> for questions regarding the operation
of IIPS.

9.  [Submit A Question on the Content of the Solicitation]{.underline}

\"Locate Solicitation\", then click on the "Submit Question" button and
enter required information. You will receive an electronic notification
when your question has been answered. DOE EERE will try to respond to a
question within 5 business days, unless a similar question and answer
have already been posted.

10. [View Questions and Answers]{.underline}

\"Locate Solicitation\", then click on the "View Questions" button. If
no questions have been submitted and answered, a statement to that
effect will appear. Potential Applicants should periodically check the
IIPS website for new questions and answers.

11. [IIPS Resources]{.underline}

[IIPS User Guide]{.underline}

This is an A-Z IIPS User Guide\--anything and everything the Applicant
would ever want to know about IIPS. This user guide can be found at:
<http://e-center.doe.gov/doebiz.nsf/Help?OpenForm> by scrolling to the
bottom of the page.

[Golden Field Office Solicitations website]{.underline}

This site contains a links to our current solicitations posted in IIPS,
and provides a multitude of information for applicants. This site can be
found at: <http://www.go.doe.gov/businessopportunities.html>

.

## APPENDIX C -- TECHNOLOGY TOPICS {#appendix-c-technology-topics .unnumbered}

DOE intends to provide financial assistance for the research of
innovative technologies for hydrogen production and delivery. This
Solicitation seeks Applications for research in several specific
technology Topics and Sub-Topics, as described below. Further
information on the hydrogen and delivery program can be obtained from
the Draft Multi-Year program Plan at
[www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells](http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells)
.

## Technology Exclusions from this Solicitation {#technology-exclusions-from-this-solicitation .unnumbered}

Proposed work under this Solicitation should complement and not
duplicate current work being funded by the DOE Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and
Infrastructure Technologies Program. Information on current projects may
be viewed at <http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells> .

This Solicitation does [not]{.underline} include topics that address the
following technology areas:

-   Technology validation of hydrogen production processes.

-   On board (vehicle) hydrogen storage.

-   On board (vehicle) fuel processing.

-   Projects focused exclusively on bulk hydrogen storage.

-   Carbon removal, capture, and sequestration. However, hydrogen
    production systems that lend themselves to subsequent carbon capture
    and sequestration are encouraged.

-   Sorbents research for CO2 removal, unless part of a comprehensive
    hydrogen production system.

-   Hydrogen separation and collection from ancillary processes where
    hydrogen is produced in limited quantities as a byproduct due to the
    limited or niche market potential.

-   Hydrogen production technologies involving large-scale central
    production (greater than 50,000 kg/day) from non-renewable resources
    such as coal, natural gas, and petroleum coke will not be funded
    under this Solicitation except as related to hydrogen separation and
    purification as indicated in Topic 4. Hydrogen production from
    hydrogen sulfide RD&D is also excluded as it is closely related to
    central production from coal RD&D.

## Topic 1. Hydrogen from Biomass {#topic-1.-hydrogen-from-biomass .unnumbered}

Appropriate Applicant cost share level: see each Sub-Topic

The total funding for Topic 1 will be up to \$15 million (including 20%
cost share) with up to 4 awards. The projects will be two to three years
in length.

Hydrogen produced from renewable biomass is not currently
cost‑competitive with gasoline due to feedstock and capital costs. DOE
is looking for projects that will result in a significant cost reduction
in producing hydrogen from biomass. A mid-term goal of the program is to
develop and demonstrate technology to supply purified hydrogen (purity
sufficient for PEM fuel cells) from biomass at \$2.60/kg at the plant
gate by 2010 (when implemented on a commercial scale; i.e., at \>50,000
kg/day). The long-term objective (2015) is to be competitive with
gasoline. In addition to the specific Sub-Topics listed below, other
process technologies that produce hydrogen from biomass are welcome.

For sub-topics 1A and 1B, areas for reforming technology improvements
include improved catalysts, catalyst regeneration, heat integration, and
reactor configuration for improved yield. In addition, increasing shift
catalyst durability and efficiency and developing a single-stage shift
reactor have the potential to reduce cost. Purification improvements in
the areas of enhanced adsorption technology, operating cost reduction,
and pressure loss would result in lower process costs. Combining unit
operations to reduce the number of steps and capital cost, such as
combining the shift step with hydrogen separations and purification in a
reactive separations mode would have significant benefit. Also, because
biomass feedstocks are often seasonal in nature, feedstock-flexible
processes are needed to operate year-round.

[Sub-Topic 1A. -- Gasification processes, gas clean-up, and catalytic
steam reforming]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

In addition to the areas discussed above, opportunities for cost
reduction in biomass gasification systems include improved feedstock
handling, better heat integration, higher gasification pressures, and
improved gas clean-up.

System modeling and integration research is also needed to move this
technology toward commercialization.

Projects that address these areas are eligible to apply under this
solicitation. Projects that integrate system components are especially
encouraged. Applications should show how the work will bring the
technology closer to the following targets:

  -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ---------
  Feedstock            Cost                \$/kg H~2~           0.60

  Operations through   Cost                \$/kg H~2~           1.20
  gasification                                                  

                       Energy Efficiency   \% (LHV)             75

  Reforming            Cost                \$/kg H~2~           0.40

                       Energy Efficiency   \% (LHV)             89

  Purification         Cost                \$/kg H~2~           0.30

                       Energy Efficiency   \% (LHV)             77

  Total Cost           \-\--               \$/kg H~2~           2.50
  -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ---------

> Note: Feedstock costs are included in these technology targets;
> however, DOE will not fund projects under this Solicitation related to
> biomass raw material feedstock cost reduction.

**[The expected deliverable from projects in this Sub-Topic is a system
that verifies the technology will meet the values shown in the target
table of this Sub-Topic.]{.underline}**

[Sub-Topic 1B. -- Pyrolysis processes, gas clean-up, and catalytic steam
reforming]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

In addition to the areas discussed above, opportunities for cost
reduction in pyrolysis systems include improved feedstock handling,
better heat integration, and improved vapor conditioning/gas clean-up.

Systems modeling and integration research is also needed to move this
technology toward commercialization.

Projects that address these areas are eligible to apply under this
solicitation. Projects that integrate system components are especially
encouraged. Applications should show how the work will bring the
technology closer to the following targets:

  ------------------- -------------------- --------------------- ----------
  Feedstock           Cost                 \$/kg H~2~            0.70

  Operations through  Cost                 \$/kg H~2~            1.50
  pyrolysis                                                      

                      Energy Efficiency    \% (LHV)              72

  Reforming           Cost                 \$/kg H~2~            0.40

                      Energy Efficiency    \% (LHV)              87

  Purification        Cost                 \$/kg H~2~            0.30

                      Energy Efficiency    \% (LHV)              77

  Total Cost          \-\--                \$/kg H~2~            2.90
  ------------------- -------------------- --------------------- ----------

> Note: Feedstock costs are included in these technology targets;
> however, DOE will not fund projects under this Solicitation related to
> biomass raw material feedstock cost reduction.

**[The expected deliverable from projects in this Sub-Topic is a system
that verifies the technology will meet the values shown in the target
table of this Sub-Topic.]{.underline}**

[Sub-Topic 1C. -- Fermentation]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

Fermentative micro-organisms for hydrogen production have not been
adequately evaluated. DOE is looking for projects that investigate
fermentation options for converting renewable biomass resources to
hydrogen including:

-   Evaluate options for converting renewable biomass resources to
    hydrogen using fermentation.

-   Develop and test fermentation technologies for converting renewable
    biomass resources to hydrogen.

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver research
results that verify the technology developed will provide a viable
pathway to producing hydrogen via fermentation for a projected cost of
\$2.60/kg at the plant gate.]{.underline}

## Topic 2. Photolytic Processes {#topic-2.-photolytic-processes .unnumbered}

Appropriate Applicant cost share level: See each Sub-Topic

The total funding for Topic 2 will be up to \$11 million (including 20%
cost share) with up to 3 awards. The projects will be three years in
length.

DOE is supporting work to develop advanced renewable photolytic hydrogen
generation technologies. The goal is, by 2015, to demonstrate an
engineering-scale biological system, which produces hydrogen at a
plant-gate cost of \$10/kg projected to commercial scale, and by 2015,
demonstrate direct photoelectrochemical water splitting with a
plant-gate hydrogen production cost of \$5/kg projected to commercial
scale. The long-term objective for these hydrogen production routes is
to be competitive with gasoline.

[Sub-Topic 2A. -- Photoelectrochemical processes]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

Research and development need to be supported to facilitate a
breakthrough in photoelectrochemical materials to meet the cost,
durability, and efficiency requirements for hydrogen production and to
minimize the land area requirements for hydrogen generation using
photovoltaics. Durable materials that meet program goals with the
appropriate bandgap and bandedge overlap for photolytic hydrogen
production have not yet been identified.

[Material Durability]{.underline}. Durable materials with the
appropriate characteristics for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production
that meet the Program goals have not been identified. The
high-efficiency materials currently available corrode quickly during
operation. The most durable materials are very inefficient for hydrogen
production. Work must be accomplished to discover and evaluate materials
for device lifetime and demonstrate 1000 hrs. of operation as proof of
feasibility, identify and develop coatings to resist corrosion, evaluate
electrolyte options for improved semiconductor durability and
efficiency, and develop accelerated screening protocols to predict
material durability.

[Materials Engineering]{.underline}. Hybrid designs combining multiple
layers of materials could address issues of durability and efficiency.

[Efficiency]{.underline}. Materials with appropriate bandedge and
bandgap for hydrogen production must be developed. Materials with
smaller bandgaps more efficiently utilize the solar spectrum, but are
often less energetically favorable for hydrogen production because of
the bandedge mismatch with respect to either hydrogen or oxygen redox
potentials. Cost-effective, hydrogen-impermeable, translucent materials
also need to be developed for these photolytic production routes.

Applications should show how the work will bring the technology closer
to the following 2010 targets:

  ------------------------------------------- ------------ --------------
  Solar-to-Hydrogen Efficiency                \%           9

  Durability                                  Hours        10,000

  Cost                                        \$/kg H~2~   22
  ------------------------------------------- ------------ --------------

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver research
results that identify materials/systems that could achieve 9%
solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, with projected durability of 10,000 hours,
and a cost projected at \$22/kg.]{.underline}

[Sub-Topic 2B. -- Photobiological processes]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

The current rate of hydrogen production in photobiological systems is
inadequate for cost‑effective implementation. Resolutions to the
following problems associated with continuous hydrogen production must
be researched and developed: 1) the hydrogenase enzyme is neither
available nor operational under aerobic conditions, 2) electron
transport rates are limited, and 3) light saturation occurs at low light
intensities.

[Light Utilization Efficiency]{.underline}. The micro‑organisms used for
photobiological hydrogen generation possess large arrays of
light-capturing antenna chlorophyll (Chl) molecules. Under bright
sunlight, this Chl antenna absorbs much more light than can be utilized
by photosynthetic electron transport, resulting in heat dissipation and
loss of up to 80% of the absorbed light. Research is needed to identify
ways to increase the light conversion efficiency, including the
identification of better and/or modified algae for hydrogen production.
Wild-type algae are optimized to use about 5% of the absorbed light; the
remaining 95% is wasted as heat or fluorescence. If most of the Chl
antenna complex in the algae can be eliminated by molecular genetic
means, the resultant algae would be tuned such that light would
penetrate much further into a culture or the cell density could be
increased. This would result in a greater number of algae producing
hydrogen.

[Rate of Hydrogen Production]{.underline}. It is hypothesized that
restrictions on photosynthetic electron transport from H~2~O to the
hydrogenase need to be eliminated by genetic insertion of a proton
channel into the thylakoid membrane under H~2~-producing conditions to
increase hydrogen production rates. These restrictions are believed to
be due, at least in part, to a non-dissipated proton gradient
established by electron transport and/or to the competitive draining of
electrons away from the H~2~-production pathway by Calvin-cycle-related
activities (competitive inhibition of photosynthetic H~2~ production by
CO~2~ and/or background levels of O~2~). Since the insertion of a proton
channel can dissipate the proton gradient and inactivate the Calvin
cycle, all of these problems might be solved by this approach. This
could allow algal cells to achieve higher rates of H~2~ production.
Other potential approaches to increasing the rate of hydrogen production
are also being sought.

[Hydrogenase Oxygen Inhibition]{.underline}. The current algal
hydrogenase enzyme is sensitive to oxygen in the direct
water-to-hydrogen process, and this limits the production of hydrogen.
There are two hypothesized approaches to address the O~2~-sensitivity
problem. The first is a system that physically separates algal O~2~ and
H~2~ production into two separate bioreactors. Research needs to focus
on how to increase the rates of H~2~ production and decrease the costs.
The second approach involves the design and generation of site-directed
mutants of the algal hydrogenase. Other possible approaches should also
be investigated.

Applications should show how the work will bring the technology closer
to the following targets:

+-------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+
| Utilization Efficiency of Absorbed Light  | \%          | 20        |
| Energy (E1)                               |             |           |
+-------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+
| Absorbed Light Energy to Hydrogen         | \%          | 5         |
| Efficiency (E1\*E2)                       |             |           |
+-------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+
| Duration of Continuous Photoproduction    | Hours       | 1500      |
+-------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+
| Cost of Hydrogen                          | \$/kg H~2~  | 30        |
+-------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+
| ![](medi                                  |             |           |
| a/image2.wmf){width="5.996527777777778in" |             |           |
| height="1.2097222222222221in"}            |             |           |
|                                           |             |           |
| E0 reflects light collection efficiency   |             |           |
| of the photobioreactor and the fact that  |             |           |
| only a fraction of incident light is      |             |           |
| photosynthetically active.                |             |           |
|                                           |             |           |
| E1 is the efficiency with which algae     |             |           |
| convert the energy of absorbed photons to |             |           |
| chemical energy (i.e., electrons).        |             |           |
|                                           |             |           |
| E2 reflects the efficiency with which     |             |           |
| this chemical energy is converted to      |             |           |
| hydrogen.                                 |             |           |
|                                           |             |           |
| E1 and E2 represent peak efficiencies.    |             |           |
+-------------------------------------------+-------------+-----------+

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver research
results that achieve the goals in the target table for this
Sub-Topic.]{.underline}

## Topic 3. Distributed Reforming Production Technologies {#topic-3.-distributed-reforming-production-technologies .unnumbered}

Applicant cost share requirement: **35% minimum**

**The total funding for Topic 3 will be up to \$8 million (including 35%
cost share) with up to 2 awards. The projects will be two to three years
in length.**

**[The expected deliverable for this Topic is a pilot scale system that
can meet or exceed the targets specified in this Topic.]{.underline}**

Small-scale distributed reforming production (i.e., 1,500 kg/day or
less) of hydrogen from natural gas and/or liquid fuels at refueling
stations, with an emphasis on fuels produced from renewable biomass
resources (e.g. ethanol, methanol, biomass pyrolysis oils, etc.), is a
viable approach to hydrogen production, but current small-scale
distributed technologies are too expensive to compete with gasoline.
Renewable biomass based liquid fuels have the added advantage of
near-zero green house gases (GHG) emissions. DOE is seeking to fund
research and development of low cost, highly efficient distributed
hydrogen production technology from natural gas, other liquid fuels and
renewable biomass based liquid fuels.

Research Applications should address ways to achieve the targets listed
in the table below. This research Topic is aimed at distributed
production for refueling stations or stationary power facilities at
capacities of 100-1,500 kg/day of hydrogen.

Hydrogen purity for use in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane fuel cells is
critical. Applications should address the following hydrogen purity
requirements:

Hydrogen Purity: 98% minimum on a dry basis;

Carbon Monoxide \<1 ppm;

Carbon Dioxide \<100 ppm;

Sulfur \<10 ppb;

Ammonia \<1 ppm;

Non-methane hydrocarbons \<100ppm;

Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Argon \<2% in total.

Opportunities for cost reductions in distributed hydrogen production
systems include better heat integration, improvements in reforming
catalysts and purification technology, development of a single-stage
shift reactor, and other unit operation integration.

Additional research concepts important to this Topic include:

\- Developing a system that integrates one or more of the following
process steps: reforming, water gas shift, and hydrogen purification.

\- Use of data from current merchant hydrogen and natural gas
infrastructure projects to evaluate required efficiencies and current
inefficiencies;

\- Delivery of hydrogen at 5,000 psi on a cost effective, synergistic
approach, integrated with the production step with capacities of up to
1,500 kg/day of hydrogen.

Distributed Production Targets

  ----------------- ------------------------ --------- ------------ -----------
  Characteristics                            Units     Status       Target

  Reforming         Natural Gas Cost         \$/kg     0.66         0.58
                                             H~2~                   

                    Cost                     \$/kg     3.08         0.24
                                             H~2~                   

                    Primary Energy           %(LHV)    70           75
                    Efficiency                                      

  Purification      Cost                     \$/kg     0.19         0.03
                                             H~2~                   

                    Hydrogen Efficiency      %(LHV)    75           90

  Compression       Cost                     \$/kg     0.34         0.24
                                             H~2~                   

                    Primary Energy           %(LHV)    82           88
                    Efficiency                                      

  Storage &         Cost                     \$/kg     0.28         0.11
  Dispensing                                 H~2~                   

                    Primary Energy           %(LHV)    100          100
                    Efficiency                                      

  Other             Cost                     \$/kg     0.51         0.30
                                             H~2~                   

                    Primary Energy           %(LHV)    100          100
                    Efficiency                                      

  Total             Cost                     \$/kg     5.00         1.50
                                             H~2~                   

                    Primary Energy           %(LHV)    62           75
                    Efficiency                                      
  ----------------- ------------------------ --------- ------------ -----------

> Notes: Costs are based on a hydrogen refueling station serving 138
> vehicles per day (690 kg per day) with on-site production assuming a
> very high (90%) utilization factor and relatively low capital recovery
> factor (11%). Much lower utilization factors would be expected during
> the early years of fuel cell vehicle introduction. Capital equipment
> costs targets assume mature production volumes of 100 units per year.
> The current status reflects the cost of using current state-of-the-art
> available technology and assembling it into a single unit. Energy
> costs assume a natural gas price of \$4.40/MMBtu (LHV) and a power
> price of \$0.07/kWh. Primary energy efficiency of each step is defined
> as Hydrogen Output LHV / Energy Input LHV of that process step. Input
> energy associated with on-site power use assumes a 35% production and
> transmission efficiency penalty (typical US grid mix). The total
> primary energy efficiency is defined as the net Hydrogen Output LHV /
> Total Energy Input LHV into the process.
>
> Applicants must consider the assumptions described in the notes and
> table above in the Application.

[SPECIFIC EXCLUSIONS FOR THIS TOPIC]{.underline}:

1\. Mobile refueling applications are specifically excluded from this
Topic.

2\. Research pertaining to hydrogen dispensers and other individual
refueling station components will not be funded under this Solicitation
when proposed as isolated research or product development efforts. When
presented as part of the overall distributed generation system,
integrated hydrogen compression for delivery to the vehicle is
encouraged.

## Topic 4. Separation and Purification Technologies {#topic-4.-separation-and-purification-technologies .unnumbered}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

**The total funding for Topic 4 will be up to \$10 million (including
20% cost share) with up to three awards. The projects will be two to
three years in length.** The DOE Office of Fossil Energy is providing a
portion of the DOE funding for this Topic.

**[The expected deliverable for this Topic is research results that
verify advanced pilot scale membranes meet or exceed the Topic
targets.]{.underline}**

As part of integrated decentralized production systems (discussed in the
Distributed Production Topic), and potentially as part of many possible
technologies to be utilized for hydrogen production, the Program
requests research Applications for new hydrogen membrane separation and
purification technologies based on membrane systems that
cost-effectively optimize different types of membrane characteristics
while maintaining key attributes for producing high purity hydrogen.

In addition to contributing to the targets described in the Distributed
Production Topic, R&D proposed under this Topic should have the
potential to meet or exceed the targets outlined in the table below--
Membrane Separations. Although the membrane type proposed may vary from
that used to develop this Target Table, desired hydrogen separation
membrane system characteristics must include: 1) a high flux rate; 2)
low cost; 3) improved durability; 4) low parasitic power requirements;
and 5) low membrane fabrication costs.

Applications proposing systems that integrate the hydrogen separation
and purification membrane with a shift reactor as a one step operation
are also sought.

Examples of desired research advances in this area include but are not
limited to the following:

> \- Verify membrane performance at high temperatures where
> intermetallic interactions are possible;
>
> \- Evaluate size reductions of membranes for use in distributed
> applications;
>
> \- Develop and model new mechanisms for hydrogen separation, e.g.
> porous ceramic membranes as a support for nanostructured dense
> membranes;
>
> \- Develop membranes suitable for use with a wide range of fuels (fuel
> flexible), especially in reforming of renewable biomass based liquid
> fuels (e.g. ethanol, methanol, biomass pyrolysis oils, etc.) and in a
> robust syngas environment, as from natural gas or coal-based
> applications;
>
> \- Develop membranes that are sulfur tolerant;
>
> \- Develop compact membranes for lower cost fabrication.

MEMBRANE SEPARATIONS TARGETS

+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+
| Characteristics       | Units       | Status       | Target         |
+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+
| Flux Rate             | scfh/ft^2^  | 60           | 200            |
+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+
| Cost                  | \$/ft^2^    | 150-200      | \<100          |
+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+
| Durability            | Hrs         | \<1,000      | 100,000        |
+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+
| Operating Temp        | ^o^C        | 300-600      | 300-600        |
+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+
| Parasitic Power       | kWh/        | 3.2          | 2.8            |
|                       |             |              |                |
|                       | 1,000 scfh  |              |                |
+-----------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------+

> Notes: Targets are based on a palladium membrane that is fuel neutral
> and can be used for hydrogen separation and purification from a
> variety of fuels. Although these membranes can be used for both
> separation and purification, the opportunity to develop other novel
> H~2~ membrane separation and purification technologies will not be
> precluded. Advances in microporous membranes and ion transport
> membranes, for example, are encouraged.

## Topic 5. Number range CHAPTERAdvanced Electrolysis Systems {#topic-5.-number-range-chapteradvanced-electrolysis-systems .unnumbered}

Appropriate Applicant cost share level: see each Sub-Topic

**[The total funding for Topic 5 will be up to \$8 million (including
the cost share) with up to three awards. The projects will be two to
four years in length.]{.underline}**

This Topic will include technologies suited for power park and utility
size systems including alkaline and solid oxide electrolysis. PEM
electrolysis is excluded in this solicitation. Key research areas
include system cost reduction and efficiency improvement including power
conversion, storage, and other components through renewable system
integration, and steam electrolysis materials and systems development.

[Sub-topic 5A. Renewable energy/electrolysis system
engineering]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **40% minimum**

Develop a low-cost electrolysis system capable of efficient, reliable
integration with renewable electricity. This can include the use of
reversible solid oxide fuel cells. This system will be designed to match
a utility scale wind turbine in the 500-1,500kW range and have the
modular capability to allow scaling to multi-Megawatt utility
applications. The system will also have the potential for direct
integration with other renewable energy sources. Research may include
electrolyzer system design, renewable electric system interface, and
grid interface with the focus on lowering capital costs and improving
efficiency of system components including storage, power electronics,
and other components.

**[The deliverable from this project is a pilot scale 500-1,500kWe
electrolysis system that can be modularly integrated with a utility
sized renewable electricity system to verify the potential of producing
10,000 kg per day hydrogen at \$2.00 per kg at the plant
gate.]{.underline}**

[Sub topic 5B. High temperature steam electrolysis]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

Research activities will explore solid-oxide technology for low cost
hydrogen production and opportunities for co-generation of hydrogen and
electricity. Research may include development of electrodes and system
designs for reversible electrolysis/fuel cell systems or development of
system designs for low cost production of hydrogen using solid oxide
technology. This technology is targeted for renewable power parks and
distributed production of hydrogen and electricity.

**[Deliverables are low-cost, reversible electrolysis/fuel cell
electrode materials and pilot scale system designs to achieve 70% energy
efficiency and hydrogen production cost of \$2.00 per kg at the plant
gate when scaled to a 500kW system.]{.underline}**

## Topic 6. Hydrogen Production Using High-Temperature Thermochemical Water Splitting Cycles {#topic-6.-hydrogen-production-using-high-temperature-thermochemical-water-splitting-cycles .unnumbered}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

**The total funding for Topic 6 will be up to \$10 million (including
the 20% cost share) with up to two awards. The projects will be two to
four years in length.**

High (500-1000 C) and ultra-high (1000-3000 C) temperature chemistry can
be used to produce hydrogen with near-zero GHG and other emission as
long as the heat source is also near-zero GHG emitting.

There are thermochemical cycles that result in water splitting and
recycling of all other chemical species in a conserved closed loop. Two
examples of this are:

> [S-I Cycle^(^]{.underline}[^1]^[)]{.underline}^
>
> 2H~2~SO~4~ 2SO~2~ + 2H~2~O + O~2~ (Heat input at 800 C)
>
> 2HI I~2~ + H~2~ (Heat input at 450 C)
>
> I~2~ + SO~2~ + 2H~2~ 2HI + H~2~SO~4~ (Heat rejection at 120 C)
>
> [ZnO Cycle^(^]{.underline}[^2]^[)]{.underline}^
>
> ZnO Zn+ 0.5 O~2~ (Heat input at 2300 C)
>
> Zn + H~2~O ZnO+ H~2~ (Heat rejection at 750 C)

There are many other such cycles.

Water can be thermochemically cracked directly into H~2~ and O~2~ at
these high temperatures.

> 2H~2~O  2H~2~ + O~2~

The heat required to achieve these temperatures can be supplied from
next generation (Gen IV) nuclear energy
([www.ne.doe.gov](http://www.ne.doe.gov/) ) or from concentrated solar
energy. Other sources of this high temperature heat are also conceivable
as long as they do not result in GHG or other emissions.

Both the OHFCIT and the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) fund this area
of research on hydrogen production. As a result, this Solicitation will
target research not being covered by NE. Thus, the following areas of
research are specifically **EXCLUDED** from this Solicitation.

-   S-I cycle research

-   Ca-Br cycle research

In addition, there is an excellent analysis of high temperature water
splitting cycles available at
<http://web.gat.com/pubs-ext/AnnSemiannETC/A23451.pdf>. Applications
should consider the results of the analysis.

This Topic is seeking Applications that will lead to the
commercialization of cost effective high and ultra-high temperature
water splitting for the efficient near-zero emission production of
hydrogen. Initial cost estimates done during the first phase of the
project must indicate that, given success, the overall process scheme
will project to a cost of \<\$2.00/kg of hydrogen for a central
production route and/or \<\$3.00/kg of hydrogen for a distributed
production route with the ultimate goal of \$1.50/kg delivered to the
point of use at 5,000 psi being ultimately achievable.

The research project should include:

a)  Verification in the lab and possibly at the pilot scale of the fully
    integrated chemistry/chemical cycles including any recycle loops.

b)  Research and development of the solar concentrator or other
    near-zero GHG emission high temperature heat source. **(Note: If the
    intended heat source is nuclear energy, this heat source is funded
    out of different Congressional appropriations (Nuclear Energy
    Office) and should NOT be included as part of Applications to this
    Solicitation.)**

c)  Integration of the chemistry and ultimate heat source at the lab and
    possibly at the pilot scale **(Note: With the exception of nuclear
    energy heat sources).**

d)  Appropriate materials of construction research for this high
    temperature use.

[At a minimum, the deliverable of the research Application must include
a) above. Applications that are more encompassing should also include
b), c), and d) above.]{.underline}

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver research
results that verify the technology developed and will provide a viable
pathway to producing hydrogen using high-temperature thermochemical
cycling with a projected cost of \$3.00/kg.]{.underline}

##  Topic 7. Hydrogen Production Infrastructure Analysis {#topic-7.-hydrogen-production-infrastructure-analysis .unnumbered}

Applicant cost share requirement: **No cost share is required**

The total funding for Topic 7 will be up to \$1.5 million with up to 2
awards. The projects will be two to three years in duration.

Applications are sought for an analysis of the options and trade-offs
for the establishment of the required hydrogen production infrastructure
assuming that hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are first introduced for mass
marketing in the 2020 timeframe.. The analysis should at a minimum
consider the following options for hydrogen production:

> Distributed Production Routes:
>
> Natural Gas Reforming
>
> Biomass based methanol and ethanol reforming
>
> Electrolysis
>
> Central Production Routes:
>
> Coal Gasification (with and without sequestration)
>
> Natural Gas Reforming (with and without sequestration)
>
> Biomass Gasification/Pyrolysis
>
> Non-Green House Gas (GHG) energy driven electrolysis (wind, nuclear,
> others)

This analysis may also include:

-   The trade-offs between distributed production at refueling stations
    vs. larger central production facilities as a function of time as
    the infrastructure is established.

-   The trade-offs between the various production options including as a
    function of time.

-   The risk of investment and stranded assets as technology improves.

-   Different strategies or options to serve rural and urban areas.

-   The interaction of the build-up of production facilities and types
    with the build-up of hydrogen delivery infrastructure.

-   Infrastructure options relative to cost, energy efficiency, and GHG
    emission impacts.

This is a large and challenging analysis area. Applications are sought
that will significantly increase our understanding of the transition to
a hydrogen economy.

[The expected deliverable for this analysis area is a complete and
comprehensive report that provides a thorough analysis of key aspects of
the necessary production infrastructure build-up for the transition to a
hydrogen economy.]{.underline}

In this Topic, collaborative teaming arrangements are encouraged between
research or analysis companies; energy industry, utility and automotive
companies; and national laboratories and universities as appropriate to
ensure ready access to the requisite available data and information. The
Applicant is also encouraged to utilize available existing relevant
models and assessments developed under the ongoing OHFCIT Program in
order to facilitate the conduct of the studies.

## Topic 8. Hydrogen Delivery {#topic-8.-hydrogen-delivery .unnumbered}

Applicant cost share level: See each Sub-Topic.

The total funding for Topic 8 will be up to \$15 million (including the
indicated cost share) with up to 7 awards. The projects will be two to
three years in duration.

Central production of hydrogen will be a cost effective means of
producing hydrogen due to the economy of large scale facilities. A cost
effective mechanism for the transport and delivery of hydrogen will be
necessary to take advantage of this. The target for the cost of hydrogen
delivery from the central production facility to the point of use at a
refueling station or stationary power facility is less than \$1.00/kg.
This includes handling, compression etc. at the refueling station or
stationary power facility.

Hydrogen can be transported as a gas at low (100-300 psig) or high
(1000-5000 psig) pressure or as a cryogenic liquid. Gas pipelines, gas
or liquid trucks, rail cars and even ocean vessels can transport it.
Some of these delivery methods are in use today for the hydrogen
currently in the marketplace for industrial use.

There is also the possibility of utilizing materials such as metal
hydrides or other hydrogen containing solids or liquids that could be
treated to release hydrogen at a refueling station or stationary power
location or even used directly on a vehicle.

The delivery infrastructure for hydrogen will entail the use of
compressors for gaseous hydrogen and liquefaction for cryogenic
hydrogen. These have significant costs and energy inefficiencies
associated with them. Improved technologies can reduce these costs and
improve the energy efficiency.

Over the course of its introduction and long-term use as a primary
energy carrier, hydrogen delivery technology may well encompass several
options. The transportation methods used at the early stages, when
volumes are relatively low, may be different than those used when it is
well established and being used in large quantities as a primary energy
carrier. At very large volumes, it is likely that an extensive pipeline
infrastructure will be the most cost-effective manner to deliver
hydrogen to much of the market, as is done with natural gas today.
However, other methods will be needed for the transition period and for
more remote locations. Lower cost and more energy efficient, effective
technology is needed for hydrogen transportation and handling.

The Program Targets are:

+---------------------------+---------------------------+-------+------+
| ##### Tar                 |                           | **2   | Ta   |
| get {#target .unnumbered} |                           | 003** | rget |
|                           |                           |       |      |
|                           |                           | **Sta |      |
|                           |                           | tus** |      |
+---------------------------+---------------------------+-------+------+
| Gaseous Hydrogen          | Cost (\$/kg of hydrogen)  | \     | \$   |
| Compression               |                           | $0.18 | 0.14 |
|                           | Energy Efficiency (%)     |       |      |
|                           |                           | 90%   | 95%  |
+---------------------------+---------------------------+-------+------+
| Hydrogen Liquefaction     | Cost (\$/kg of hydrogen)  | \     | \    |
|                           |                           | $1.11 | $.53 |
|                           | Energy Efficiency (%)     |       |      |
|                           |                           | 65%   | 87%  |
+---------------------------+---------------------------+-------+------+
| Hydrogen Gas Pipelines    | Trunk Lines (\$/mile)     | \     | \$   |
|                           |                           | $1.4M | 600k |
|                           | Distribution Lines        |       |      |
|                           | (\$/mile)                 | \     | \$   |
|                           |                           | $600k | 350k |
+---------------------------+---------------------------+-------+------+
| Hydrogen Carrier          | Hydrogen Content (% by    | 3%    | 10%  |
| Technology                | Wt.)                      |       |      |
|                           |                           | 45    | 150  |
|                           | Hydrogen Content (kg of   |       |      |
|                           | hydro-gen/M^3^)           | 80%   | 85%  |
|                           |                           |       |      |
|                           | Energy Efficiency (%)     |       |      |
+---------------------------+---------------------------+-------+------+

[Sub-Topic 8A - Pipelines R&D]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **30% minimum**

Research and development to reduce the capital cost of a hydrogen
pipeline infrastructure including:

-   Materials and installation (joining etc.) research to reduce the
    capital cost of installing new dedicated hydrogen pipeline in line
    sizes from 1" to 36".

-   Research and analysis to enable cost effective retrofitting of
    existing natural gas pipelines to dedicated hydrogen use.

-   Research and analysis to enable utilizing existing natural gas
    pipelines to carry a mixture of hydrogen and natural gas, in
    combination with a cost effective separation and purification system
    at the point of hydrogen use to separate out purified hydrogen
    suitable for PEM fuel cells while returning the natural gas to the
    pipeline grid.

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver results
that verify the technology developed will enable achieving the pipeline
target in the target table for this Topic.]{.underline}

[Sub-Topic 8B -- Compression]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **30% minimum**

Research and development to reduce the cost, increase energy efficiency,
and improve the durability and reliability of hydrogen compressors for
use in pipeline infrastructures and other hydrogen production, storage,
transportation and end use operations. Compression from as low as 1 atm.
to as high as 10,000 psig is of interest.

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver results
that verify the technology developed will enable achieving the
compression target in the target table for this Topic and result in
reliable and durable hydrogen compressors that do not require installed
redundant equipment.]{.underline}

[Sub-Topic 8C -- Liquefaction]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

Liquefaction currently costs \> \$1.00/kg of hydrogen. The larger the
scale, the lower the cost, due to the economy of scale and energy
integration. Research and development is sought to reduce the cost by
50% and to increase the energy efficiency from \~ 65% to \>80%. It is
also desirable for the advanced technology to be cost effective and
energy efficient for small scale liquefaction operations (\<1,500 kg/day
of hydrogen) as well as large scale operations (50,000-400,000 kg/day).

The cost to transport cryogenic liquid hydrogen is also costly due to
the need for expensive insulating systems and due to the problem of boil
off. Innovative ideas to reduce these issues and related costs are also
being sought.

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver results
that verify the technology developed will enable achieving a
liquefaction cost reduction of 50% with an energy efficiency of
87%.]{.underline}

[Sub-Topic 8D.- Novel Solid or Liquid Hydrogen Carriers for Hydrogen
Delivery]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement: 20% minimum

There has been considerable research on hydrogen carriers for use for
on-board vehicle storage of hydrogen. Such carriers include reversible
metal hydrides, chemical hydrides, carbon structures, and other
concepts. Some of these technologies are reversible in place, capable of
being charged with hydrogen and then releasing hydrogen by changing
physical conditions. Others need to be returned to a more central
facility for more extensive processing to be "recharged" with hydrogen.
Concepts utilizing organic or other liquids are also possible. These or
other novel solid or liquid carriers that might achieve a high hydrogen
energy density and which could release the hydrogen with minimal
processing and energy use, such as simple heating, either at a refueling
station or stationary power unit, might provide a low cost delivery
system for hydrogen from a central production facility. If it
simultaneously met the overall delivery cost goals and the on-board
vehicle hydrogen storage goals, one technology could be utilized for
both delivery and on-board vehicle storage. (The on-board vehicle
hydrogen storage targets can be found in the draft Multiyear RD&D Plan
at
[www.eere.doe.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells](http://www.eere.doe.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells).)

Research Applications are sought for novel solid or liquid carrier
technologies that would enable achieving the overall goal of a hydrogen
delivery cost of \<\$1.00/kg from a central production facility to the
point of use at a refueling station or stationary power facility.
Potential use of the carrier system for on-board vehicle hydrogen
storage would be an additional very significant benefit.

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver results
that verify the technology developed will enable achieving an overall
cost of hydrogen delivery from a central production facility to its
point of use at a refueling station approaching \$1.00/kg and achieve
the Hydrogen Carrier Technology targets in this Topic.]{.underline}

[Sub-Topic 8E. -Hydrogen Delivery Infrastructure Options
Analysis]{.underline}

Applicant cost share requirement**: No cost share is required for this
Sub-Topic**

Applications are sought for an in-depth comparative analysis of the most
promising hydrogen fuel delivery options to deliver and distribute
hydrogen from large (\>50,000 kg/day) and smaller (1,500-10,000 kg/day)
production facilities to refueling stations and stationary power
facilities. The options should be evaluated on a common basis using
available data and the existing knowledge base, making defensible
extrapolations and projections as needed. Delivery options to be
evaluated should include but not necessarily be limited to new dedicated
hydrogen pipelines, use of the existing natural gas pipelines for pure
hydrogen, use of the existing natural gas pipelines for mixtures of
hydrogen and natural gas with separation and purification of the
hydrogen at the point of use, gaseous truck or rail delivery, liquid
hydrogen truck, rail or pipeline delivery, the use of novel solid or
liquid carriers such as hydrides or solvents, and the strategy of
producing and transporting liquid intermediates such as ethanol that
would be reformed at the point of use to hydrogen. The delivery
system/infrastructure is here defined as what is required starting with
200 psi hydrogen gas at the production facility and ending with delivery
to the point of use at a refueling station or stationary power facility.
In the case of liquid fuels (e.g., ethanol) the delivery
system/infrastructure is defined for the liquid fuel from the production
facility through and including distributed reforming to hydrogen gas at
the refueling station or stationary power facility.

Applicants are expected to include the following in the proposed
comparative evaluation:

-   Evaluation of the current data and knowledge base available for each
    of the candidate delivery options assessing cost and energy
    efficiency. Where there is a paucity of data or information
    available the Applicant should develop "best practice estimates"
    supported by technical rationale.

-   Evaluation of projected cost and energy efficiency for 2010, 2020
    and 2030 based on research in progress and/or rational and
    defensible scientific logic.

-   Evaluation of the existing infrastructure capability for these
    delivery options.

-   Evaluation of which delivery options would be most suitable in a
    well established hydrogen economy to service both urban and rural
    regions, as well as those most suitable during the transition to the
    hydrogen economy and why.

-   Studies to define the energy requirements and levels of GHG and
    criteria pollutants emanating from the use of the delivery options
    examined within the delivery system infrastructure.

-   The analysis should include the needs related to bulk storage of
    hydrogen within the delivery infrastructure (but does not need to
    include storage within the hydrogen/fuel production operation nor at
    the point of use).

[The expected deliverable for this Sub-Topic is a complete and
comprehensive report that thoroughly analyzes all of theses issues and
provides a recommended strategy for hydrogen delivery infrastructure R&D
and establishment.]{.underline}

In this Sub-Topic, collaborative teaming arrangements are also
encouraged between research/analysis companies, energy industry and
utility companies, and national laboratories and universities as
appropriate to ensure ready access to the requisite available data and
information. The Applicant is also encouraged to utilize available
existing relevant models and assessments developed under the ongoing
OHFCIT Program in order to facilitate the conduct of the studies.

NOTE: Applications for this Sub-Topic must be on a schedule for
completion by 4Q 2005.

## Topic 9. Crosscutting Projects {#topic-9.-crosscutting-projects .unnumbered}

The Applicant **cost share requirement** is the highest cost share
requirement defined in Topics 1 through 8 that is a significant part of
the proposed crosscutting project.

The total funding for Topic 9 will be up to \$10 million (including cost
share) with up to two awards. The projects will be two to four years in
duration.

Research projects that cut across some of the specific Topics of
research sought in this Solicitation are also of interest. Examples
include:

> \- Applications that combine research on distributed production of
> hydrogen using reforming or electrolysis combined in a synergistic
> manner with novel integrated compression technology to produce and
> deliver high pressure hydrogen more cost effectively.
>
> \- Applications that combine research on hydrogen pipelines for
> mixtures of hydrogen and natural gas with novel separation technology
> to separate and purify the hydrogen at the point of use.
>
> \- Applications that combine research efforts on central production of
> a bio-based liquid, delivery of that liquid to a distributed refueling
> station, and reforming of that liquid to hydrogen.

There are other possible cross-cutting Applications that might meet a
combination of the needs expressed in the specific Topics of this
Solicitation. Such Applications will be considered under this
Solicitation. The Application must state that it is a Topic 9
Application and indicate which of the above Topics and Sub-Topics will
be addressed in the crosscutting project.

[The expectation is that Applications in this area will deliver results
that verify the technology developed will enable achieving the targets
described in the above Topics pertinent to the crosscutting
project.]{.underline}

## Topic 10. University Projects {#topic-10.-university-projects .unnumbered}

Applicant cost share requirement: **20% minimum**

**The total funding for Topic 10 will be up to \$7.5 million with up to
four awards. The projects will be three to four years in duration.**

Universities are encouraged to participate in collaborative teams with
industry and National Laboratories in response to this Solicitation,
with cost sharing by industry and the university Applicant. Often
universities can conduct more fundamental research in support of the
applied research within a project. This often can yield better overall
results over the duration of the project by applying the fundamental
learning to the project.

In addition, it is recognized that there is value in more basic and/or
high risk feasibility research that industry may not yet be willing to
make a major investment relative to hydrogen production and delivery.
For this reason, DOE is seeking Applications from universities for up to
\$300,000 per year per university for 3-4 years, focused on basic and/or
feasibility research that will be published in the literature and enable
achievement of the goals described in this Solicitation and in any of
the research areas of interest to this Solicitation. Examples include,
but are not limited to, the following:

-   Fundamental analysis, research, or molecular modeling of reforming
    or shift catalysts that could enable the development of step change
    improvements in reforming of feedstock to hydrogen.

-   Fundamental analysis, research, or molecular modeling of membrane
    materials and technology that could lead to a breakthrough in
    hydrogen separation and purification.

-   Fundamental analysis, research, or molecular modeling of hydrogen
    embrittlement of pipelines that could lead to a breakthrough for
    pipeline delivery.

-   Feasibility research on novel, unproven concepts that could result
    in breakthrough technology to meet the stated goals in this
    Solicitation.

A university can, thus, submit an Application under this Topic 10 as a
single entity or as a team of several universities, for more basic
research or initial feasibility research aimed at any of Topics 1-9
(excluding Topic 7 and Sub-Topic 8E). The Application should indicate
which Topic and Sub-Topic the Application supports as well as indicate
that the Application is in response to Topic 10.

[Applications in this area will deliver research results that will
enable the achievement of the relevant Topic targets.]{.underline}

[^1]: . See reference article at
    <http://web.gat.com/pubs-ext/AnnSemiannETC/A23451.pdf> .

[^2]: . A. Berman, M. Epstein, *The Kinetics of Hydrogen in the
    Oxidation of Liquid Zinc with Water Vapor,* Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
    **25**, 957 (2000).