BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-29
Company: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA
State: CA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Credit card debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was result of identity theft

Complaint:
This is still a dispute with the First National Bank of Omaha XXXX XXXX. A police report and FBI complaint are on filed for the fraud committed by this fraudulent company. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX do not owe First National Bank any money. It had all been paid off. Please stop First National Bank of Omaha XXXX XXXX from calling and sending notice on collection. 

This is a fraud scam that I fell on. It is a fraud company offering fraud employment. 
Its been more than six months and this dispute of identity theft and fraud had not been resolved. XXXX XXXX XXXX 's money was stolen and gifts cards was stolen after the bar code where given to them. Payments were reversed either by the bank or the crooks. XXXX XXXX XXXX did not give out any of her credit card account numbers. Therefore, its either a data breach or the credit card company inside jobs inducing debts on its customer with a ploy. 

This is a total fraud scam and a crime induced upon XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX Bank Fraud department can be investigated on the company account. 

That XXXX XXXX Account is not XXXX XXXX XXXX account. It is most probably a fraud account created by fraudulent scammer.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-26
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Public record information inaccurate

Complaint:
The bureaus are reporting a bankruptcy Under the new law effective XXXX XXXX 2017 any public record data must include name address as well as SSN. or DOB in order for it to appear in your credit file. The credit bureau has not updated the information and per the new law true bankruptcy listed does not include this information..

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-11-29
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CO
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I have a XXXX account on my collections. I made a payment to settle the account in XXXX. The company sent me letters confirming. I made a dispute and neither XXXX nor Equifax will fix the error on my report. 

They are also not reporting the correct amiunts for my student loans. They randomly grabbed a number out of thin air. 

Neither account will change. 
Also EVERY couple of day XXXX put a new remark on my account after the last payment was made. Months after that payment was made to be exact. This made my credit drop like 100 points even after the last payment was made. They updated my account with wrong information Every 2 to 3 days for months. I also made payments three months prior to the last payment for the full settlement. This included two payments in XXXX. I sent all documents confirming that to all three : XXXX Equifax and XXXX.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-26
Company: CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
State: WV
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit repair services
Issue: Confusing or missing disclosures

Complaint:
I WAS LIED TO AND TRICK INTO CO SIGNING MY SISTER ASK ME COULD SHE USE ME AS REFANCE SO SHE GET A CAR .I TOLD HER XXXX NOT CO SIGNING SHE SAID NO NOT THAT.THEN SHE PUT ME ON PHONE WITH THE GUY SHE WAS BUYING THE CAR FROM WHICH A CAR DEALERSHIP.I TALK TO THE GUY I TOLD HIM I'AM NOT XXXX SAID NO JUST NEEDED ANOTHER XXXX ON HER APPLICATION SO I SAID OK AS LONG AS XXXX HAVE CO SIGN OR PAY HER DEAIT. SHE GOT THE CAR AND REPO IT IN XXXX MONTHS NOW IT ON MY CREDIT REPORT.FOUND OUT SHE WENT WITH THE GUY I WAS LIED TO.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-09-02
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: WI
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Was not notified of investigation status or results

Complaint:
On XX/XX/2022, I sent a letter regarding inaccurate and unknown things on my credit report to this day over 30 days later I have not received a response yet. I feel like I'm taken advantage of and being ignored for my disputes. Section 611 ( a ), it is plainly stated that failure to investigate these items within 30 days gives a reason to immediately remove those items from my credit report, it has been over 30 days so they should be deleted promptly. I demand these accounts should be deleted immediately or I will file for litigation due to the stress you caused me. My information was also impacted by the XXXX Data breach and may have got into the hands of the wrong person.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-03-07
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Was not notified of investigation status or results

Complaint:
To Whom It May Concern, Please be advised that I have received your computer-generated letter stating that you have ceased investigation of my credit reports because, in your opinion, you believe that I have used a third-party credit repair agency. Not only do I believe this to be a stall tactic on your part to grant you an additional 30 days to comply with my original request, but I believe it to be a blatant violation of the FCRA. 

You were advised by me on XX/XX/2022 by certified mail that I questioned the accuracy of a few items on my credit reports. That request was written by me and mailed by me- not a third-party agency. It appears obvious to me that you are abusing your power under the FCRA to escape a complete investigation.

Here again is the incorrect information being reported : 1. 15 USC 1666b a creditor may not treat a payment on a credit card account under an open-end A consumer credit plan as late for any purpose FDCPA 807 False misleading information FDCPA 8012 furnishing deceptive forms must remove late payments under XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : XXXX THIS ACCOUNT IS INACCURATE, I DID NOT INCUR ANY LATE PAYMENTS. PLEASE UPDATE TO PAID ON TIME Additionally, there is NO law that states a consumer can not use a third party, so using that as your excuse is an irrelevant. In fact, the United States Congress has found the whole process so overwhelming that they afford consumers the right to use a third party on their behalf if the consumer so chooses. This is why your statement is so shameful. 

I reserve the right to sue a credit bureau for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and I believe I can prove that you did not use reasonable measures to ensure the accuracy of my credit reports and now you are stalling the process even further. 

I realize disputes can be expensive and it is your job to stall them, but you do so at great risk. Please take notice that this letter dated XX/XX/2022 is formal notice to you that I am requesting that you continue forward with my original investigation request and please send the results to me within 15 days. I therefore legally and lawfully refuse your " form letter '' thus giving you only 15 days not 30 more.

I am annoyed and outraged at your accusation and I have researched my rights in regards to my credit file. Please expedite my original request immediately.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-03-07
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize

Complaint:
On XX/XX/2022, I sent the credit reporting agencies letters notifying them that they are in violation of 15 USC code 1681b ( f ) - reporting inquiries without my permission. I am in distress and this matter has affected me from getting access to different forms of credit which is I personally needed in my everyday living. I will be left no choice but to seek legal remedies shall this issue not be taken care of.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-26
Company: Manhattan Beach Venture, LLC
State: NY
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Federal student loan debt
Issue: Communication tactics
Sub-issue: Frequent or repeated calls

Complaint:
Over a year, a company called Manhattan Beach Venture , LLC a loan consideration company reached out to me to help me with my student 's loan. As the process took place information was exchanged, and I wanted to reach back from them to see if I was approved. I never heard back from them. A few weeks later I heard from a different company called XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) reached out to me in regarding telling me that they were the ones who processed the consolidation and payment will start up in XXXX of 2016. 
I was afraid that Manhattan Beach Venture , LLC might have sold my information to this company. I asked them to provide a phone number for Manhattan Beach Venture since I have had a hard time reaching them two days after speaking to them. The number XXXX XXXX offered was a nonworking number. I also told them that I did n't reconsolidation with them and was still waiting to hear back from Manhattan Beach about my application. I told them that I spoke with Manhattan Beach and I did n't know why a different company was reaching out to me for future payment. For a service that I did n't yet agree to pay for yet. I did n't sign my name to anything so, why would I provide a phone to a person over the phone that I had never hear of. 
Ever since XXXX XXXX got my phone number, they have been harassing by phone and email. They also stated that they had emailed me notifications for payment as well. I ask them many times to stop calling me. Each time they called me they asked for a credit payment. And each time I tell them that I will not pay them for something that I can do myself by going online through the department of education. 
I have reported them to the BBB and other government entities. 
I have been trying for over a year to reach Manhattan Beach Venture , LLC, the company I originally dealt with, and I have had no luck. Each phone number I have tried I get an error message, or fax sound come from the other end. 
Begin of XXXX I got in contact with XXXX XXXX about the contract I signed and as I read the document place that should have been signed or name should have written on was done by someone else. Because the signatures/printing does n't match my own. 
I am at a loss, I contacted a lawyer about this situation, and I am frustrated and at a loss and I do n't know what do. 
Any help I can receive would be greatly appreciated. 
Thank you,

Company public response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-09-02
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
My name is XXXX XXXX this complaint is not made in error neither is it being made by a third party.I declare under penalty of perjury ( under the laws of the United States, if executed outside of the United States ) that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Further, I certify that I am permitted by FEDERAL and STATE LAW to file this dispute. I also understand that knowing and willful misstatements or omissions of material facts constitutes a FEDERAL CRIMINAL VIOLATION punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Additionally, these misstatements are punishable as perjury under 18 U.S.C. 1621. The items found within my credit report that I listed on the following pages are not related to any transaction that I made. I am alleging that a person or company- without my authorization- used my personal identifying information to apply for goods, services, or money ; and, was successful in creating some accounts. All is being investigated by the FTC.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2019-11-29
Company: LD Holdings Group, LLC
State: MD
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Closing on a mortgage

Complaint:
My loan experience has been awful. While that is one thing, it has now cost me money out of my own pocket so I felt the need to formalize my complaints.

From day 1, I made it clear my cashout refinance needed to close early to mid XXXX. I literally followed up every day with the LO or Processor to ensure this happened. I was never once told this would not happen, but it felt like we were moving slow. Then, the day for closing, when I finally reviewed my documents, I noticed they had the wrong property address on the CD ( embarrassing considering they had an appraisal completed ) and did not have a deed to add my wife to title ( which was told to both the LO XXXX and Processor XXXX ). This delayed closing another week. I escalated to a manager ( XXXX ) and was essentially told this timeline is completely normal. 

Fast forward to the day of closing and I'm notified that my funds will be available in 10-15 days. I asked why it was more than 4 ( 3 days to rescind ) and was again told this is normal because they're busy. At that point, I had to take a loan out against my 401k to pay for the trip we had already scheduled as a family. Good thing I did! We are now two weeks since " funding '' and I still don't have my money. I don't even know what it means for a loan to " fund '' when I don't actually receive any funds.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-26
Company: Ditech Financial LLC
State: GA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage

Complaint:
XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX c/o XXXX XXXX ( P.O.A ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Ga XXXX The purpose of this letter is to file a complaint against Ditech LLC ( servicer ) & XXXX XXXX ( investor ). 
Around XXXX or XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX had contacted Ditech ( servicer ) for some assistance on the mortgage payments. XXXX XXXX advised the representative the mortgage payments are almost amount received for her SSI. Thus, XXXX XXXX is experiencing financial hardship due increase of expenses around the house. The representative confirmed that Ditech can aid with this request, but XXXX XXXX is required answer a few questions to see if qualified to receive some forms from XXXX XXXX to aid with her request of a manageable mortgage payment. 
I, XXXX XXXX, am XXXX XXXX XXXX, and I assisted my mother with answering those questions & filling out the forms ; however, XXXX XXXX or I was not advised the main requirement required to be approve for assistance from Ditech & XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX & I was never advised by all the representatives & supervisors from Ditech, letters from Ditech, missing documents from Ditech & XXXX w/ XXXX XXXX XXXX Ditchs response from the file compliant, XXXX 15 days investigating against Ditech , emails from XXXX , and phone calls with XXXX that we were advised that XXXX XXXX mortgage payments must be 60 to 90 days delinquent before providing any assistance. 

Therefore, our thought process is why send the forms for assistance twice, why tell us what documents were missing, why send all the required documents & forms for assistance, and why do a 15 days investigation if Ditech & XXXX w/ XXXX XXXX both knew XXXX XXXX mortgage payments were not delinquent & the account would not be approved because of this reason. 
When XXXX XXXX called Ditech onXX/XX/XXXX to see why, and a representative stated it was XXXX XXXX  who made the decision & that maybe my mother should sell her home if she could not afford her home. However, XXXX w/ XXXX XXXX stated it was Ditech who made the decision, and it was nothing XXXX XXXX could do as an investor. Then XXXX XXXX refused to provide XXXX XXXX with a supervisor, that all supervisors have a set schedule, the supervisors do not wait after XXXX to speak with consumers, and stated did advised XXXX XXXX of the 60 90 days delinquent. 
Thus, I reviewed all letters, documents, & emails very careful before writing this letter, and it was nothing said about the 60 90 days delinquent requirements. Now, XXXX XXXX mortgage payments are going to be {$860.00} w/ a SSI income of {$800.00}. All the letters & documents stated some kind of assistance would be provided ; however, we only got a rejected letter. 

Thanks XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-06-24
Company: FIFTH THIRD FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: OH
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Managing an account
Sub-issue: Problem making or receiving payments

Complaint:
An app, XXXX XXXX, has not been updated in 7 days. This has caused the app to stop functioning. There is little to no communication from 5/3 Bank.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-09-02
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NV
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
When I reviewed my Credit Report I noticed that there are still accounts that are reporting erroneous and incorrect information.I am not satisfied that you have completely fulfilled the guidelines of the Fair Credit Reporting Act in conducting your examination. I sense that the accounts needs a proper action to assure maximum possible accuracy on my credit file. 
XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$35000.00} ; XXXX  XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$700.00}.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-26
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: TX
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement
Sub-issue: Credit card company isn't resolving a dispute about a purchase on your statement

Complaint:
On or about XX/XX/XXXX, 2017, I initiated a billing dispute for {$960.00} with Citi for a charge to XXXX XXXX XXXX. The {$960.00} was a deposit for a moving service that XXXX  XXXX XXXX.was to provide. However, XXXX XXXX XXXX canceled my move mid-move and stole my deposit. I explained this to Citi and attempted to recover my {$960.00} deposit, but was told by XXXX from Kentucky ( Citi Employee # : XXXX ) that " if the contract states the document is non refundable citi can not change the terms because it was agreed by the consumer. '' This effectively allows any business to simply include " non-refundable '' in their documentation, cancel their part of the agreement, and take advantage of/steal from customers. I believe this goes against the intent of customer protections that credit card companies are supposed to provide. Citi allowed XXXX XXXX XXXX to steal my money!

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-26
Company: ID Analytics, Inc.
State: MN
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone

Complaint:
XXXX 2017 applied for a car loan. Was denied credit based on report from XXXX XXXX giving low credit score when all other companies show over 800. Unable to contact via phone and website states only way to obtain report is to mail in numerous personal documents. No clear explanation as to why credit score is reported low by XXXX vs other companies. Reason listed is " trades too low ''?

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation