Consumer complaint received 2022-09-06
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account information incorrect

Complaint:
On XXXX I went to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX for the reason to purchase a vehicle. The funds being used were from a certified check verified via telephone by XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX for XXXX as I sat at his desk. Once the funds were verified, XXXX XXXX who I was told doesnt work there anymore, began printing out the paperwork to transfer the vehicle into my name and any other paperwork needed for the transfer of my vehicle. Before signing any of the paperwork, I ask XXXX XXXX if they would be running my credit because one of the papers that was placed in front of me looked like a credit application. I asked to make sure that this was a cash purchase and informed XXXX XXXX that I did not want my credit ran, being that being that I was in the process of building credit and shouldnt have my credit ran on what was equal to a cash transaction. XXXX XXXX assured me that there was no need to run my credit because as I heard when he called to verify the fund, that the funds are indeed verified via the earlier call. With that reassurance I signed all the paperwork XXXX XXXX placed in front of me and drove home an hour later in my XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

XXXX I call up to XXXX  XXXX to inquire as to why I still have not received the license plates or title to my vehicle. While on hold I see the consumer credit contract or retail installment sales contract that shows that I financed the vehicle and made one payment for the total amount of the vehicle. I inquire with XXXX the new Finance Manager, as to why they would document a cash transaction as if I financed the vehicle. XXXX informed me ( 7 months after purchasing the vehicle ) that they indeed did run my credit and the reason that the company does that is in case the funds from the check were not available. Again XXXX XXXX called and verified the funds right in front of me so I immediately pointed that out and addressed the violations including identity theft with him before ending the call. XXXX did not have my permission to run my credit at all. XXXX should not have falsely recorded what is equivalent to a cash purchase as a retail installment loan when there was never a loan that XXXX XXXX provided me. 

There was no reason for them to run my credit. There was no reason to open a retail financing contract when the vehicle was paid in full with a verified check. If they did have a company policy to the contrary that was not disclosed to me and should have been as soon as i told the finance manager that i did not want my credit ran. 

I am rescinding any signature that gave this fraud validity due to the fact that full disclosure was not present even when the opportunity arose to present it was addressed by me demanding that they not run my credit.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation