Consumer complaint received 2017-09-12
Company: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.à r.l.
State: GA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: I do not know
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Sub-issue: Seized or attempted to seize your property

Complaint:
We received an email requesting " Feedback about the company 's response ''. We did not read the company 's response. We know their responses without reviewing them. The XXXX is obvious. We were alerting the CFPB to what you already knew. The CFPB knows that XXXX steals homes ; you acknowledged that by filing a second lawsuit. 

If the Victims were mainly " XXXX '' ; this would have been stopped a long time ago. No ; let me correct that, it would have never started. You have a XXXX XXXX  company that is stealing " XXXX '' people homes ; there are other victims as well ; but just like predatory lending, the main victims were XXXX. 
The CFPB also knows that Altisource is used to illegally confiscate these stolen homes for XXXX. Altisource paid XXXX XXXX for their relationship with XXXX. As of XXXX, XXXX the CFPB was once again investigating the XXXX XXXX XXXX Relationship ; so the CFPB is well aware of their crimes. The CFPB sued XXXX AGAIN for these crimes ; along with XXXX Other States. 

It does not take a genius to see that XXXX States banning these crooks and filing their own lawsuits, as well as cease and desist orders against XXXX proves that XXXX and their attorneys are engaging in Illegal Activities ; and our research has revealed that it is mostly against XXXX People. 

When the CFPB saw that XXXX and their XXXX party vendors, aka Unscrupulous attorneys violated the previous XXXX XXXX ; that alone was grounds for a cease and desist order. They should have issued a cease and desist order just like the XXXX states that sued XXXX on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. The CFPB knew they were continuing to steal homes and chose to look the other way. We 'll say it again ; if it were XXXX people, it would be a different scenario. 

Filing a lawsuit and providing {$1800.00} to people that have lost their homes to these crooks is an INSULT. The CFPB, was created in part to govern these crooks, but has allowed them to continue in their well known, obvious Crimes. XXXX 's actions are not in dispute, or debate. The Investigation from the last Consent Order reported that XXXX files false, deceptive, mortgage related documents and affidavits ; files Illegal Foreclosures and Violates Homeowners Rights. What part of that Investigative Report do you not understand? Altisource is one of their Co-Conspirators ; and the CFPB knows this as well ; or you would not be investigating their relationship. 
In our case ; XXXX, Altisource and these XXXX attorneys knows that they DO NOT have any type of contractual relationship with us. They know that they have NEVER collected for our Lender ; they know they have never received one dime from us ; they know that our home has no liens or mortgages. They Know This. What they did not know was that Criminal Charges would be filed ; and that they could not complete a fraudulent conveyance. 

These crooks have tried everything in the book to steal our home ; and because we XXXX XXXX, has the AUDICITY to defended ourselves and our property, by filing numerous complaints with the CFPB and the Bar Association ; they RETALIATED by having Altiosurce attempt to confiscate our home ; aka steal it out from under us ; but THEY FAILED ; because what they discovered when they went to the courthouse to file one of those " Deceptive Mortgage Related Documents '' referenced in the Consent Order ; is that these XXXX XXXX XXXX, who has the AUDICITY to defend themselves from these Crooks do we do own our home. 

Altisource broke into our Privately Owned Home ; and did over {$7800.00} worth of damage ; and used Foreclosure as the excuse according to Altisource Ombudsman, XXXX XXXX. There was NO FORECLOSURE ; so whats the excuse now. There is no excuse ; XXXX never has an excuse. We have possession of our home ; No Foreclosure was EVER filed. 

This was a XXXX XXXX ; and a Violation of our Civil Rights. I guarantee you that if we were XXXX ; this would not have happened. If we were XXXX, XXXX would have fixed their mess by now. our home would have been repaired by now. 

The CFPB wanted our feedback ; well here is our feedback. We are disgusted. As XXXX we defended this XXXX ; including these XXXX People who tried to steal our home. The CFPB, who has the authority to govern Altisource and XXXX has failed. 
When the CFPB saw a need to file a second Lawsuit because XXXX had violated the previous Court Order/ Consent Order, a Cease and Desist Order should have been filed ; and if the Victims were XXXX ; it probably would have been filed. 

The CFPB deals with Civil issues ; and this is a Criminal Issue as well as a Civil Rights Issue ; plain and simple, a XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX now has the jurisdiction.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation