BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-29
Company: LD Holdings Group, LLC
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
Loandepot reported a payment 30 days late. I believe this is unfair, as outlined below : Summary of events.
1. XX/XX/XXXX : Received statement dated XX/XX/XXXX, which showed monthly payment of {$440.00} due on XX/XX/XXXX, with the grace period ending XX/XX/XXXX.
2. XX/XX/XXXX : Made monthly payment, but somehow accidentally indicated a checking account that I dont use anymore.
3. XX/XX/XXXX : Received statement dated XX/XX/XXXX, which indicated that the payment due XX/XX/XXXX was made successfully, and the next normal monthly payment due XX/XX/XXXX, with the grace period ending XX/XX/XXXX.
4. XX/XX/XXXX : Realized my mistake in # 2 above, and so immediately made the payment again.
5. XX/XX/XXXX : Received statement dated XX/XX/XXXX, the first time I was notified of any fees, and immediately made payment of {$500.00} to cover monthly payment as well as the fees.
6. Mid-XX/XX/XXXX : Noticed the 30-day-late reported on my credit report.
Apparently the original monthly payment that was due XX/XX/XXXX was deemed 30-days-late because the payment that I had intended to apply toward that amount owed was applied instead to later fees that I had no knowledge of. 

I believe it is inherently unfair to the consumer to report a 30-day-late payment to the Credit Reporting Agencies when the reason for the payment being late is that the payment was unexpectedly allocated to a more recent charge on the account ( the late and NSF fees generated by my clerical error ).
Further exacerbating this, I was given no notice of said fees until well after it was too late to avoid the 30-day-late status. I paid said fees immediately upon notice.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-19
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
us dept of education has two accounts appearing wrongfully on XXXX, transunion and XXXX  ... ..they are both account no.s XXXX and XXXXBOTH OF THE ACCOUNTS HAD A FINAL PAYMENT XX/XX/2011.both of the accounts have been delinquent since XX/XX/2011 and never were brought current.So according to the FCRA both of the accounts should have been removed from all of my credit files about 1.5 years prior.THE DATE OF FIRST DELINQUENCY IS IN XX/XX/2011.THIS IS CAUSED BY MISREPORTING OF THE CREDIT HISTORY.THIS IS A VERY GRAVE ERROR ON THE PART OF THE CREDITOR AND BUREAUS.THE BUREAUS INVESTIGATION MUST INCLUDE WHAT I HAVE JUST STATED AND BE DELETED.ANY OTHER BEHAVIOR WILL LEAD TO INJUNCTION OF THE SUIT IMMUNE CREDITOR AND A STATUTORY WITH LIKELY PUNITIVE DAMAGES AGAINST THE BUREAUS.BEING A REPOSITORY CARRIES OTHER FCRA DUTIES SO WITHIN 30 DAYS ALL BUREAUS MUST REMOVE THESE 2 ACCOUNTS BECAUSE WHAT I HAVE SAID IS FACTUAL.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-19
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
us dept of education has two accounts appearing wrongfully on XXXX, XXXX  and equifax ... ..they are both account no.s XXXX and XXXX..BOTH OF THE ACCOUNTS HAD A FINAL PAYMENT XX/XX/2011.both of the accounts have been delinquent since XX/XX/2011 and never were brought current.So according to the FCRA both of the accounts should have been removed from all of my credit files about 1.5 years prior.THE DATE OF FIRST DELINQUENCY IS IN XX/XX/2011.THIS IS CAUSED BY MISREPORTING OF THE CREDIT HISTORY.THIS IS A VERY GRAVE ERROR ON THE PART OF THE CREDITOR AND BUREAUS.THE BUREAUS INVESTIGATION MUST INCLUDE WHAT I HAVE JUST STATED AND BE DELETED.ANY OTHER BEHAVIOR WILL LEAD TO INJUNCTION OF THE SUIT IMMUNE CREDITOR AND A STATUTORY WITH LIKELY PUNITIVE DAMAGES AGAINST THE BUREAUS.BEING A REPOSITORY CARRIES OTHER FCRA DUTIES SO WITHIN 30 DAYS ALL BUREAUS MUST REMOVE THESE 2 ACCOUNTS BECAUSE WHAT I HAVE SAID IS FACTUAL.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-30
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: PA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I discovered that some of the information on my credit report was incorrect when I reviewed it. Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) require the 3 credit bureaus to validate these accounts ( A ). It is not permissible to fail to validate these reporting accounts as unverified information without providing any proof within the time frame specified by law. My credit report includes the following erroneous information that needs to be investigated and deleted : XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$890.00} XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$530.00} XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX : {$740.00} XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX : {$0.00}

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-04-12
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CA
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Problems caused by my funds being low

Complaint:
I have documentation that shows that US Bank would not charge a Returned Item Fee nor an Overdraft Fee on my account ( Number XXXX ). When a withdrawal or other debit came in and there were non-sufficient funds, the payment was returned, without charging any fees, unless the resulting overdraft amount was negligible ( This occurred seven times between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX on the old account as shown by notices received in the mail attached herein ). 
On XX/XX/XXXX, I opened a new account at US Bank ( XXXX XXXX ). On XX/XX/XXXX, an overdraft fee was charged, and a few days later two other payments were returned, one other was returned and more fees were added. The Bank has failed to provide satisfactorily explanation of this change in policy. At the time of opening the new account, I was not given any notice or warning that new rules would apply. The Bank keeps adding extended overdraft fees. 
In my perception, the bank should have not honored any payments that were underfunded nor charged any fees for overdraft nor returned items because US Bank created a reasonable expectation through consistent behavior upon which reliance was reasonable. The Bank should bring the account to XXXX balance at its own expense. Further, the bank should refrain form a threatened charge off or any other report that will harm my credit history.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-04
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
Debt collectors aren't supposed to commit abuse, deceptive and unfair debt collection practices but your firm has done so. 


A debt collector furnishing an alleged debt to my consumer report as a means of coercing me to pay an alleged debt is extortion. Collection of extensions is a violation of 18USC894 and carries a criminal liability up to 20 years.

Debt Collectors do not have any lawful right to be in possession of my identifying information.

A debt collector thats furnishing a collection to my consumer report is in violation of 15 USC1692d ( 4 ) which is engaging in unlawful extortionate activities. 


Coercing myself to pay you an alleged debt by ruining my financial reputation is a violation of 18 USC894. Now because you all benefit at my expense, the debt collector, original creditor, and consumer reporting agencies again are engaging in racketeering activity 18 USC 892 ( b ) ( 1 ) -Companies have no right to attempt to collect the alleged debt by way of judicial processes.

Again debt collections can't lawfully : Possess by identifying information, Contact me about an alleged debt, ruin my credit, or SUE me for nonpayment of a debt.

Please understand debt collector has no lawful standing according to 15 U.S. Code16921 ( b ) Please understand this is also aggravated identity theft 18 USC 1028A.

Lastly, 15 USC 1692c ( a ) states debt collectors shouldnt be contacting me if I didnt give prior consent. 

Im requesting to have this alleged trade line debt to be removed effective immediately from all CRAs

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-19
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: FL
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Problem caused by your funds being low
Sub-issue: Bounced checks or returned payments

Complaint:
Banking errors due to branch teller and credit card department verification resulted in overdraft of over {$4100.00} to my checking account. 

On XX/XX/XXXX, I visited the local branch on XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, FL to see about depositing a BOA credit card 0 interest promotional check that I received from BOA in the mail. I talked to the teller and explained I want to deposit the check for {$5000.00}, which I had in availability from my BOA Credit card. The teller contacted credit card services to verify the amount and check and said yes you can however regular interest applies. She then issued the deposit for XX/XX/XXXX availability. On XX/XX/XXXX, without any notifications or phone calls, I noticed my account overdraft - {$4100.00}. I contacted BOA, who for 1 hour 40 minutes gave me the run around and didn't help me. They explained an error in which the check goes to cash advance in which I only have {$3000.00} available. I explained this wasn't the case and teller verified, however they said no, it doesnt come out of regular balance, only cash advance. I then said please help resolve this and no one at BOA did their diligence to help me. I was transferred to card src, who explained a cash limit can be req. I did this, only for the rep to say after, it will take 5 days for a response. Why didnt she tell me this before the req? I needed this done now to fix the overdraft issue. Now fees will pile up for days, even though bank manager on phone said they would remove the fees. I don't trust BOA now and I doubt they will stick to their word by clearing all these fees, even though this was total miscommunication on BOA 's end and 100 % not my fault. Once this is dealt with, I will close all BOA accounts and never do business with them again. The lack of customer service, communication and the fact they left a 20 plus year customer like me hanging for this issue with no care at all. Just to tell me to wait. BOA did nothing to help me for almost 2 hours tonight. Worst customer service ever imaginable and now I'm stuck with a negative balance with no access to account funds. Put yourself in my shoes and see how this feels.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2021-08-06
Company: Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.
State: MO
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint:
Chrysler keeps calling me harassing me for payments even after my loan has been paid in full and is failing to update the credit bureaus.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-30
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: AZ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint:
On my transunion report I dispute a collection and it says it was removed but it still shows on my credit report and I have screenshots saying its was removed

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2019-11-27
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: LA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account information incorrect

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX transferred loan to XXXX. XXXX split loan into 2 separate loans. 
XXXX is reporting negative late payment from 2018 inaccurately. XXXX not only created 2 separate accounts from one account from XXXX XXXX but are also incompletely and inaccurately reporting negative information. The time that XXXX is reporting Negative, XXXX XXXX is reporting positive. The account was transferred to XXXX. DELETE XXXX ACCOUNTS ON ALL 3 CREDIT BUREAU REPORTS AS THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE CREATED 2 LOAN ACCOUNTS FROM 1 TRANSFERRED ACCOUNT AND SHOULD NOT BE REPORTING ANY NEGATIVE INFORMATION. SEND REPORTS WITHIN 30 DAYS SHOWING ITEMS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM CREDIT REPORTS.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-30
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MO
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
Upon reviewing my reports, the incorrect accounts was still presenting in my reports which I believe has been taken care of due to the written appeals I sent. The last letter sent to XXXX, XXXX and TransUnion was XX/XX/2022, but no response was ever received from them to date. Thus, their action has violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 USC Sections 1681i. The following accounts listed below are still reporting on my Credit Reports and need to be corrected in my file immediately : XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} ; XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance Owed : {$1500.00} ; XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance Owed : {$1200.00}

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-28
Company: Coinbase, Inc.
State: NY
Product: Money transfer, virtual currency, or money service
Sub-product: Virtual currency
Issue: Other transaction problem

Complaint:
I have an account with Coinbase.com where I have roughly {$50000.00} worth of cryptocurrency stored currently. I recently traveled to XXXX as a tourist and my account is locked as a result ( as of XX/XX/XXXX ). I can not get a response from Coinbase support to reactivate my account and restore access to my assets ; I have contacted the company approximately 15 times since my account was disabled, and provided all of the documentation they requested ( e.g., proof of residency in US, government ID, etc ). Coinbase has replied ( XX/XX/XXXX ) noting that they have escalated the issue, but I have heard nothing since, despite repeated follow-up attempts by me. I need reassurance that I will have access to my money restored immediately. Three weeks is an unacceptable amount of time to be waiting for a response on an issue that should straightforward to resolve. 

Case number : XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-30
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
My name is XXXX XXXX XXXX this complaint is not made in error neither is it being made by a third party.I declare under penalty of perjury ( under the laws of the United States, if executed outside of the United States ) that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Further, I certify that I am permitted by FEDERAL and STATE LAW to file this dispute. I also understand that knowing and willful misstatements or omissions of material facts constitutes a FEDERAL CRIMINAL VIOLATION punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Additionally, these misstatements are punishable as perjury under 18 U.S.C. 1621. The items found within my credit report that I listed on the following pages are not related to any transaction that I made. I am alleging that a person or company- without my authorization- used my personal identifying information to apply for goods, services, or money ; and, was successful in creating some accounts. All is being investigated by the FTC.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-19
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NV
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
These are not my accounts. Please remove them.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-30
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MO
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I come across on my credit report, there was incorrect items appears when I reviewed it. Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) require the 3 credit bureaus to validate these items ( A ). It is not permissible to fail to validate these reporting accounts as unverified information without providing any proof within the time frame specified by law. My credit report includes the following erroneous items that needs to be investigated and corrected : XXXX XXXX  XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} XXXX XXXXBankruptcy Reference # XXXX Date Filed/Reported:XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-19
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: PA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
In XXXX, I disputed an account on my credit report with XXXX XXXX as I was a victim of identity theft. Upon XXXX  XXXX doing their own investigation, I received a letter in the mail dated XX/XX/XXXX indicating that they looked into my claim and found that the account in fact was fraudulent and also indicated that a request would be sent to XXXX, Equifax, XXXX  and XXXX to delete this account from my credit file. 

XXXX XXXX did exactly that and everything was as it should be until XX/XX/XXXX when suddenly a third-party collector, XXXX XXXX XXXX reported this same account to all three major credit bureaus, and it showed up as an unpaid derogatory and collection account. 

First and foremost, I never had any association with this company whatsoever. Secondly, how did they even obtain my personal information, and thirdly and most importantly, I still have possession of the letter directly from XXXX XXXX on their letterhead regarding this matter which they indicated the account was fraudulent and then subsequently requested the removal of this account from my credit file to no longer negatively impacting my creditworthiness. 

I truly value my credit and manage it very well, so I find it appalling that XXXX  XXXX would sell my information even after this matter was resolved in XX/XX/XXXX and this third-party company would try to coerce me into paying them money that I DO NOT owe them. What is most bothersome in this entire matter is the fact that XXXX XXXX XXXX sent me a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX and acknowledged my dispute and stated that they are awaiting to receive additional documents from the seller! Their words not mine. They paid for my information and admitted to it. Additionally, the same letter indicates in the interim they initiated a request that the three major credit reporting agencies delete this referenced account. 

Well why would XXXX XXXX XXXX proceed to have the account deleted if in fact I owed them any money at all which I clearly do not? Is this an attempt for them to clean up an oops on their part and cover their tracks because I should have never had to experience this egregious error causing unwarranted anguish by sabotaging my credit as if I'm guilty until proven innocent. 

To date, this account has already been removed from XXXX  and XXXX  but not Equifax. I corresponded with Equifax directly about this matter and was told they're unable to remove the account despite the fact that I have written proof that should easily remove it just as it was removed from the two other major credit bureaus already. 

With all of that in mind, your assistance with a swift resolution to this very upsetting matter will be greatly appreciated.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-30
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
This is not a duplicate nor is this complaint being filed by a third party, I am filing this complaint myself. Please see this complaint is processed to the letter of the law. 
. When I reviewed my credit report, I discovered that some of the information was erroneous. The 3 credit bureaus must validate this account in line with Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). It is not authorized to fail to validate this reporting account as unverified information without providing any proof within the period allowed by law. The account need to investigate and delete from erroneous reporting in my file are listed on my credit report:XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation