BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2016-11-20
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NC
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
XXXX is still showing on your credit report stating that there is a balance of {$940.00} on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX i sent a letter requesting validation but received a return letter on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX stating that they sold to another company, XXXX XXXX XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX this account should not be on your report and I want it removed. Immediately. I have since sent another letter on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX to XXXX, still listed on my credit file and XXXX XXXX onXXXX with no response.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-31
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MI
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of my credit report
Sub-issue: Report improperly shared by CRC

Complaint:
My complaint is with Trans-union, XXXX, XXXX. Improper use of my credit report. They are reporting a bk on my report I called the court, and court does not validate or verify that information. That information was pulled from a third party, Therefore its in-accurate and now must be deleted immediately.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-15
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MI
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
My ex husband XXXX XXXX and his current girlfriend XXXX XXXX keeps using my credit and I ca n't even access my report because I do n't know what creditors and mortgage companies they are using.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-03-29
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account status

Complaint:
Type Energy Account Name Account XXXX Other Date XXXX XXXX, XXXX Status Closed No Missed Payments Balance {$0.00} Account Details Last Reported XXXX XXXX, XXXX Creditor Name XXXX Account Type Utility Company Account Status Closed - Paid Opened Date XXXX XXXX, XXXX Closed Date XXXX XXXX, XXXX Limit -- Term -- Monthly Payment {$0.00} Responsibility Individual Balance {$0.00} Highest Balance {$95.00} Payment Status Current Worst Payment Status Current Date of Last Payment XXXX XXXX, XXXX Amount Past Due $ 0 Times 30/60/90 Days Late XXXX Remarks Account closed by consumer Payment History XXXX OK OK OK OK XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-10-01
Company: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Old information reappears or never goes away

Complaint:
Hi, I have made late payments before with the following companies below : - Capital One ( Vehicle Loan ) - XXXX  XXXX XXXX ( Personal Credit ) - XXXX XXXX ( Personal Credit ) - XXXX  ( Personal Credit ) - XXXX ( Personal Credit ) I admit that I have missed and late payments with them before, but I already paid them all off. To this day, even when Im doing better with my credit cards, old information from them still hurts my credit score. 

With Capital One, the full Vehicle Loan was to be paid within 6 years. I have paid it full, 2-3 years early ( XX/XX/2022 ). 

With XXXX  XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX, I have paid them all off, before closing them. 

I couldnt find nor provide my Statement Accounts information from them, because as I said, all my accounts with them were already closed. 

Please do help me resolve this problem. 

Thank you.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-20
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: UT
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account terms

Complaint:
My complaint is with Transunion. 
They have been informed several times that the negative items on my report from : XXXX And XXXX / XXXX XXXX / $ XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX / $ XXXX debts they bought from : XXXX XXXX that XXXX XXXX bought from : XXXX, Way back in XXXX & XXXX. 
I WON the Litigation AGAINST XXXX in XXXX XXXX, California with many others!! 
There for there insisting in buying and selling these debts and destroying my credit, any year they choose " to continue doing, '' '' since '', is unethical, dishonest, slanderess, and actions of CROOKS!!! 
Why Transunion keeps allowing this/ " even when " this is NOT the FIRST TIME they ARE TOLD is beyond any thing honest!, or, Responsible for the PHONY INTEGRITY they pretend to up-hold. If they DID their JOB, this would n't be happening. 
The same thing goes for the public record : XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX 's from XXXX XXXX Aquisitions as well!!!

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-08-15
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: OK
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account information incorrect

Complaint:
XXXX continues to report my credit card balance incorrect. The card is paid to a XXXX balance each month prior to their reporting. XXXX  continues to report the card with almost a {$3000.00} balance. This has been an ongoing issue for over three years now. There have also been consumer financial protection bro complaints filed on the same issue and have never been resolved. There is a serious pattern of non compliance.
I have requested a letter in writing from XXXX XXXX  for federal credit union stating the account was paid to a XXXX balance and was reported as a XXXX balance on XXXXXXXX17.
XXXX refuses to respond to my written correspondence and refuses to speak to me on the phone regarding this issue.
XXXX XXXX and Experian have both tried to contact XXXX at the number provided on their reporting, however, the phone number provided is disconnected.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-07
Company: AFNI INC.
State: AK
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was paid

Complaint:
This is a bill for XXXX service that I did not receive. I called to disconnect service many times due to relocation/move. I spoke with several reps who told me service would be stopped ( XX/XX/2016 ). I believe my service was not stopped. Thus, I am disputing this collection.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-24
Company: REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: IL
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Other bank product/service
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
Regions Bank has provided inaccurate information to CRAs and XXXX in regards to my account. They are claiming I owe a balance of {$150.00} and have listed the same debt several times on the reports and to XXXX. They have not mailed a bill to my address or contacted me by phone in regards to this bill. In addition, in 2014 they swept my account for $ XXXX to satisfy a loan I had with them without my consent and now they are still saying I owe them and providing the CRAs and XXXX with this information.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-12
Company: BANK OF THE WEST
State: CA
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Making/receiving payments, sending money

Complaint:
My bank this morning dispersed $ XXXX.from my bank account, without my permission. They made a {$2500.00}. wire transfer payment on a bill with a balance of {$150.00}. 
The recipient/XXXX knew the payment was in error and has voided the check.Bank of the West Type to enter text is doing nothing to restore that money to my bank account, leaving me overdrawn several thousand dollars! After many hours investigating what could possibly have happened, I believe was caused by an error Bank of the West processing center. 
The Bank is doing nothing to help me even though I notified them at XXXX of the problem. 
Their Customer Service keeps wanting to make it my fault! 
My account is now overdrawn several thousand dollars and I can not pay my bills withdraw any money!. 
Type to enter text

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-19
Company: CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, THE
State: NJ
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Account opening, closing, or management

Complaint:
I 'm a young professional not far removed from college and I had a Charles Schwab Bank High Yield Investor Checking account. After years of being a diligent customer -- never once overdrafting -- Schwab sent me a letter titled 'Re : Closure of Schwab Accounts ' in the mail, in which they informed me they were closing down my account in one month, without providing a reason why. 

This caused angst because I had to scramble in a short period of time to re-arrange my banking life so I could make pending payments on-time and avoid fees. Contributing to the angst was the fact that the monies in the Schwab account were helping Mom and Dad cover some of their bills. 

I asked Schwab by phone for an explanation re : the closure, but they informed me they were not legally required to explain why. I wrote the CEO of the company directly to appeal the closure. This appeal was rejected. And when I asked for an explanation, they again refused to provide any information. 

In short, Schwab fired me as a customer -- a good and diligent customer -- without explaining why.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-03
Company: SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
State: CA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint:
SPS XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX CA XXXX We are writing this complaint .... One that we have written on almost every file that we have had over the last 1.5 years with Select Portfolio Servicing ( SPS ). SPS is again dragging their feet on working on this file and has stretched out the file review for an additional 90 days. They continue to claim that each time their request a new document that they automatically give themselves another 30 days to review the file. So it should be no surprise at all that they end of each thirty day period, a new document is requested. This game has go on now for 3 successive months. Escalations of the file within SPS ' system yield no results and it appears that they only two reasons this is occurring is that it allows them to milk more servicing fees out of their dimwitted investors ( who have yet to catch on that anything is even going on on their asset ) and an utter lack of employees. It is very sad, but we have had managers at SPS tell us that they are doing the 'best ' they can, but are grossly understaffed. One can only assume that the chronic understaffing is being done in order to increase their profits at the expense of their investor, the borrower, and the communities in which these properties reside. 

I humbly request that instead of us having to continually fight to even get our clients documents review and files worked on that the CFPB take administrative action against SPS. Not only is the CFPB 's database filled with complaints against SPS, but a quick XXXX search will provide days .... In not weeks of reading material on the subject of SPS and servicing fraud. 

We would appreciate if the CFPB could put pressure on SPS to actually review and complete the file that we have submitted.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-05-21
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Investigation took more than 30 days

Complaint:
I sent a letter to the credit bureaus and never heard a response back. The information on my credit report is inaccurate and affecting me getting housing. I do not know what to do.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2015-12-04
Company: BB&T CORPORATION
State: VA
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Savings account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
My savings account was involuntarily closed after the financial institution claimed that my overdraft protection exceeded the XXXX per month - preapproved transfers for a period of 12 months. In order to avoid any returned checks or transactions, I was prohibited from making any transfers of my own. This allegation that I exceed the XXXX transaction per month is the furthest from the truth and has caused me financial hardships of authorized e-checks being returned, my account being charge overdraft fees, and thus my checking account going into the negative. The intent of the overdraft protection is to avoid overdraft fees in the amount of {$36.00}, by having any debits that exceed the checking account balance to be extracted from the savings account. I was unaware of any limits per month - not to mention, I have not exceeded the checking account balance more than XXXX times out of a 12 month period. Closing the savings account has cause even more inconvenience as I have a {$500.00} direct deposit going into this account on a bi-weekly basis and will have to re-channel this EFT, in addition, I will need to go into the bank and withdraw the monies into the savings as the account is no longer valid. Much of the confusion stems from the manner in which the financial institution process its transactions, debits/credits/bill pay, etc.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-08-23
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: NC
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX XXXX sold my loan to Nationstar Mortage LLC. It is almost impossible to deal with this company and took pulling teeth to finally find out how to pay my mortgage. Now I receive a letter from my insurance company ( XXXX ) that even though I am paying my mortgage that XXXX is not receiving mortgage insurance premiums. I am paying for insurance with XXXX but XXXX is keeping the money and not paying my insurance company.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-04-17
Company: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Investigation took more than 30 days

Complaint:
NAVY FEDERAL CU has not provided any debt validation, a copy of a contract or anything to that affect to properly report onto the credit bureaus. 

I have asked them repeatedly for some kind of debt validation, a copy of a contact and they are unable to provide that information.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-12
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
I disputed a collection account on my credit report with XXXX XXXX XXXX account number XXXX. I contacted XXXX in XXXX 2016 disputing this account and XXXX sent me a letter stating that the account did not belong to me and that they would remove the account from my credit report. After considerable time, the XXXX account was not removed. I initiated a dispute with Equifax and sent a copy of the letter from XXXX relating to this account and that the account should/would be removed. 

Equifax responded that the account was verified and he information was reporting correctly. How is this possible, when the XXXX sent a letter stating that it did not belong to me and it would be removed. Equifax has violated the FCRA and dishonestly keeping this account on my credit file. I provided the verification from XXXX, so why is the account not removed instead of updated with bogus verification. 

This account should be removed within the 15 days allowed for response relating to this complaint.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-03
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Reinserted previously deleted info

Complaint:
I have had these inquiries on my account for a very long time despite disputing them because I never tried to open these account. I had proved that I have been a victim of Identity theft however these inquiries still remain on my credit report and therefore harming me negatively. They are listed below on all XXXX of my credit reports : XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-10-28
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: AZ
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
Signed up with a billing company to pay for a gym membership. The original company has been paid in full and has given me ample documentation to support that my account is closed and completely satisfied. 
A few months before I fulfilled that contract, however, another billing company which I had never heard of contacted me separately and told me they would be billing me for the same contract, but a much higher amount. They insisted that the original billing company had assigned the account to them but would not provide any documentation to the fact. They proceeded to autodebit my account, which was made possible because the gym gave them my billing information before promptly going out of business, preventing me from contacting them. 
After fulfilling the original contract, I presented this information to my bank during their investigation of the wire fraud. The second company then responded by assigning the fabricated debt to a collection agency, which then reported the information to TransUnion and XXXX. 
Upon requests under the FCRA to the credit agency ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) and Transunion both for validation of the debt, I was merely sent a copy of my original contract with the first company and told that it was valid. All parties plainly ignored the documentation I submitted to them from the contract company, including detailed payment records and a plain-text statement that the account has been completely satisfied. 
The gym which opened the account in my name has closed ( XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, SC ). The billing company who attempted to autodebit my card ( XXXX ) has closed and re-opened under many names. In fact, a simple google search on their business leads to a wealth of information about their shady practices and willingness to verbally abuse their victims. 
TransUnion has elected to not exercise due diligence when investigating my account. This is evident in the fact they attempt to " verify '' the debt by referring to my contract with XXXX, in spite of my submitting plain-as-day letters and statements from XXXX stating that the account is completely satisfied. To make matters worse, they did n't even bother verifying the amount : The contract clearly states a total amount of {$1200.00}, but somehow this has turned into a debt of {$1400.00}! The fraudulent debt quite literally added an arbitrary amount to the debt without any explanation as to why, but this was also ignored. No party attempts to deny that the account in question is the same one that is already satisfied, demonstrating that this collection account is a shameless attempt to force me to pay twice. If a plain English statement from the creditor that this debt is invalid is not enough to invalidate the debt, what in the world is?

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief