Consumer complaint received 2016-09-02
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: VA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Public record

Complaint:
An initial dispute was made through the CFPB porthole on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. Experian has failed to provide me with the vendors information so that I may contact them with regard to inaccurate information being reported on my Consumer Report. The courts stated that they DID NOT provide any information to Experian and that the company had a third party upload information from Pacer to E-OSCAR. I request my private right of action pursuant but not limited to 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2b and 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( 6 ) ( A ) ( B ). See : XXXX v. XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ). The burden to conduct the reinvestigation is on the credit reporting agency. It can not be shifted back to the consumer. Experian continues to deny me my rights by not properly investigation the dispute ( s ). Additionally, Experian continues to deem fraudulent accounts verified when the alleged furnisher has not provided any authenticating documents to substantiate their claim. A credit reporting agency 's reinvestigation obligation is to verify the accuracy of its original source of information. This duty may include going beyond the original source. Whether the credit reporting agency must go beyond the original source depends on a number of factors, including : ( 1 ) whether the consumer has alerted the CRA that the original source may be unreliable ; ( 2 ) whether the CRA itself knows or should know that the original source is unreliable ; and ( 3 ) the comparative costs of verifying the accuracy of the original sources versus the potential harm the inaccurate information XXXX cause the consumer. See : XXXX v. Experian Information Solutions , Inc., XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ). I request my private right of action pursuant but not limited to 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2b and 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( 6 ) ( A ) ( B ) and ( 15 U.S.C. 1692g ), for verification/validation of the debt including the following ; 1 ) US BKPT CT VA XXXX XXXX is NOT my account 2 ) US BKPT CT VA XXXX XXXX is NOT my account 3 ) US BKPT CT VA XXXX XXXX is NOT my account 4 ) US BKPT CT VA XXXX XXXX is NOT my account 8 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, VA XXXX I never lived at this address 10 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, VA XXXX I never lived at this address 12 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX, VA XXXX I never lived at this address The FCRA section 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) outlines your responsibilities in case of disputed accuracy. Moreover, I am requesting that Experian to verify as required of this company by federal law for physical verification of the original signed certified consumer contract- of any and all accounts listed herein pursuant to 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). I demand to see a copy of the Verifiable, validated proof of the accounts disputed herein ( an original consumer contract with a wet ink signature affixed ) as copies of copies are not validation and by law are not considered proof. ( See : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, PA, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ). ( Finding that computer printouts are not verification of a debt ). The law is very clear as to Civil liability and remedy available to me for " negligent noncompliance ''. I request my private right to action pursuant but not limited to 15 U.S.C. 1681i ( a ) 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2, 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2b and 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( 6 ) ( A ) ( B ). See : XXXX v. XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ). The burden to conduct the reinvestigation is on the credit reporting agency. It can not be shifted back to the consumer

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation