BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2016-02-03
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: NY
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Other bank product/service
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
My grandmother wrote me a check for XXXX, but the date was wrong. I did not notice until the bank teller told me so. Now, this is understandable. I laughed it off and went home to call my grandmother. She apologized and wrote me a new check. Now, keep in mind that she is XXXX XXXX XXXX. After driving quite a distance to pick up this new check, I arrived approximately 1 week later to the very same bank location. And the very same teller. Little did I know, my grandmother had crossed out the new check number and written the old check number. Apparently this is not okay. So, I was denied once again. A little frustrated at this point, but by no means mad. This is again, understandable. After waiting a week and driving ANOTHER quite a long distance, I pick up a third check from my XXXX year old grandmother. Did I mention this has taken up a significant amount of my time and money? Driving long distances and leaving work early, etc. I arrive at the bank once more, same location, same teller, confident that " third times a charm. '' Well it is not. This time, my poor XXXX year old grandmother 's handwriting is " illegible. '' It is to the point where I am being profiled. I was told I need to tell grandma she needs a power of attorney. My grandmother does not need a power of attorney. The best part is, I heard XXXX tellers say the amount of this check aloud. It 's clearly legible.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-09-15
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: MS
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Non-federal student loan
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt is not mine

Complaint:
To obtain student loans my personal information was submitted to the Creditor without my knowledge and without my personal signature to validate any of the information given by the individual who received the loans. I requested over and over again for the company and collection agencies to please stop all collection efforts toward me. I provided proof that the signatures on the applications, did not match my signature, the spelling of my last name, address and place of employment all are incorrect on their loan applications. I disputed the accounts because they are NOT MY LOANS, NOR DID I CO-SIGN for these loans. These loans were granted to the individual without my knowledge and without any request from the creditor asking for approval as a co-signer. I am getting repeated requests and notices from different collectors to pay these loans. I have asked for collection actions to stop and for them to remove the negative infomation from my credit record. My requests go as far back XX/XX/XXXX via phone conversations, then via writing starting in XX/XX/XXXX. Now, they have turned this over to an Attorney firm that is once again sending notices threatening to take action. These are not my loans and I need this to stop as soon as possible and removed from my credit record. This is interfering with my health and XXXX to stay focus.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-29
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: NJ
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Using a debit or ATM card

Complaint:
I was charged three times by XXXX for a ticket I ordered once. I could not get a hold of anyone at Wells. XXXX people at XXXX, in particular XXXX, threatened to hang up on me despite XXXX rippingme off.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-03-15
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: UT
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)
Issue: Communication tactics
Sub-issue: Frequent or repeated calls

Complaint:
This is Wells Fargo. On XX/XX/2017 their system called my cell phone and left a voice mail lasting 1 minute and 22 seconds without saying a word. I feel this should be considered a form of harassment.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-01-25
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: NM
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Non-federal student loan
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Having problems with customer service

Complaint:
Hello my name is XXXX XXXX, I went to XXXX XXXX and have been attempting to pay my loans down and get better interest rates. I have a situation that I may need help with. I figure I 'll give you the info and you can help guid me from here. I refinanced some private student loans from XXXX ( navient ) to XXXX in XXXX of 2015. Everything funded all was well, but in my account login for navient under that same account number it shows I still owe XXXX ( rounded down ) on that account. I verified that the amount XXXX funded was total loan amount. I can only conclude that they made an error. I have contacted them with my concern once in XXXX. Not hearing from them I 'm or seeing any difference in the account I need to address this before any more time passes. I messaged them again inquiring what the deal is but I 'm paying interest on a loan that is already consolidated. I do n't know how exactly to proceed. I could use some guidance if this is an issue you can help me with. 

Thank you, XXXX XXXX. 

Sent from my iPad

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-04
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: TX
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Making/receiving payments, sending money

Complaint:
Bank of America has stolen money from me for years, but now I have proof. 
I was sent {$200.00} and {$100.00} by way of their banking app and never received the money in my account. I have done this numerous times over the past year, and it has worked fine. But for some reason, now, the money is not coming into my account. I have already spent a few hours on the phone about this and they continue to tell me they do n't see anything. I have pictures from the individuals ' accounts who sent me the money confirming the money left their account into mine. I have given confirmation numbers for both transactions and the bank told me those are n't good for anything.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-11-08
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: WA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of my credit report
Sub-issue: Report improperly shared by CRC

Complaint:
This is a formal complaint against TRANSUNIONAccording to my credit report, XXXX XXXX is currently reporting to TRANSUNION that I applied for credit with XXXX XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/2015 I did not grant TRANSUNION authorization to provide access to my credit report or share my credit report with XXXX XXXX. 

The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires that a creditor be able to verify the written authorization of the consumer giving the creditor permission to review their credit. If you can provide a copy of a credit application authorizing the disclosure of my credit files with my signature, I will accept the inquiry. If a signed authorization can not be found please remove the inquiry. 

The presence of this inquiry is adversely affecting my credit report. Time is of the essence so I would greatly appreciate a response from you immediately. Please mail me the copy of a signed application or a letter indicating your intention to delete the inquiry.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-05-19
Company: Ditech Financial LLC
State: KY
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint:
Our home had a foundation problem that was very bad. Had to send papers to mortgage company where we had a special engineer come in an give us cost home much it was going to cost to fix foundation. Was going to cost us XXXX dollars to fix..was working with mortgsge company ona deed in leiu. But never heard anything back. All i got was my wages garnished..

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-09-14
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: NJ
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Savings account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
While overseas during the month of XXXX and XXXX 2016 and had prepared to use my ATM card held at WF and had successfully made withdraws, such as on XXXX/XXXX/16. Some days later, XXXX/XXXX/16 I went to the same location and attempted to withdraw funds and was given an error message. I went to another ATM ( different Bank ) and got the same error. I then call WF customer service and confirm that funds was available and told her of the error message, to which she suggest that I make sure I select SV. I agreed and told her that I have made successful withdraw before and well aware of options.I tried XXXX other ATMs and still received same error message and placed XXXX more calls to WF, where I was treated with disrespect and horrible customer service. At no time did the agents tried to resolve issue, but instead stress that the account is not being linked. Frustrated on the last call the agent was so rude I asked for a supervisor to which he told me NO! 
I was left cashless, hungry and embarrassed because I had not funds to pay for a surprise cake for my mothers birthday. On top of this I was hit with numerous fees ( multiple in XXXX day ) as " excessive ''.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-30
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: CA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional adjustable mortgage (ARM)
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Complaint:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage has refused to give me this current information and your help is needed. I feel Wells Fargo Home Mortgage is duel tracking in a attempt to refuse a loan to me and discriminate against a XXXX women. Loan # XXXX XXXX XXXX, Property Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX XXXX, CA.XXXXWhat the status of my Loan Modification Application? 
On what date did you receive my Loan Modification Application? 


XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-01-17
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: TX
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker

Complaint:
Ref- Case number : XXXX I just received a call from a representative at Wells Fargo 's Executive Resolution Department where she explained to me that Wells Fargo 's conclusion to my complaint is that I should 've " tried harder '' to get a hold of my processor if I truly wanted to lock in the rate the date that I emailed him. She also proceeded to explain that if I could n't get a hold of him over the phone that I should 've escalated the issue to a manager so I could get a prompt response. I explained that perhaps I would 've if I would 've gotten an out of office response from my processor, but he neglected to have one set up on his email and voicemail. I am very disappointed with Well 's response because this is a big company that should be held to higher standards. Where I work, when you are out of the office you set up an out of office response on your email so people know you are out, when to expect you back, and who to contact for immediate assistance. ( Same goes for voicemail ) Wells Fargo does not believe in this type of best practice. 
As for updating their website to explicitly state a purchase agreement is required to lock a rate, I was told that it is still under a review as to if it is getting updated or not. I 'm not sure how my complaint can be closed out without having a completed review of well 's website if I was directly impacted by the information that was provided on there. I was also told that it was the employees responsibility to inform me what was needed and not the website. That begs me to question why Wells Fargo even has a FAQ page then, if its not complete and accurate, because I 'm clearly being told I should 've only inquired by phone. I disagree with the responses I was provided by Wells because they are excuses and I 'm getting pinned as the customer because they claim I should 've done more to get a prompt response ( instead of 4 days ). I should n't have to suffer for someone who is out of office and I do n't know about it, a different employee should 've had access to his emails and/or my file. What happens when people go on vacation for a week? Do people 's files stay at a stand still? I would like further review from the CFPB and get CFPB 's input on my complaint because I am being treated unfairly.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-26
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: NJ
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Trouble with how payments are handled

Complaint:
My Issue is with NAVIENT : They are a complete scam! 
I have a consolidated Parent Plus Loan. I would like to pay quicker by making extra payments or changing the terms ( when they got loan from XXXX XXXX they put me in what I think is like a 30 year term .. without communicating it to me ) Now, their terms jump from 120 payments to 300 payments .. nothing in between ..really no 180 payments? They have the pay as you earn and such, but I do n't qualify ( because I am a parent ) I called to ask them to apply the excess payment to my principal. I was told that I needed to send a note requesting that with my monthly check. I explained that I pay my bills online, I was told they needed request in writing ... then as instructed requested in writing that my extra payment be applied to the principal NOT interest or to the upcoming payment. My letter was ignored, I sent another.. again ignored bunch of letters later ... I called again.. they verified that they had received my instructions ... yet my extra payment is applied to following month! Even tough I pay regularly the same amount ( {$50.00} above my scheduled payment ) there are string of months when NOTHING goes to lower my principal. Even when they do apply something to principal, it is a fraction and it is always a different amount that has no logic ( it could be more than last month, or it could be less or it could be nothing!! ) Never had a loan like this!! THIS IS A NEVER ENDING LOAN! I pay and pay and owe basically the same principal! I have paid my car loan, my mortgage ... they are mathematically calculated based on a formula ... WHAT IS NAVIENT 's formula? Now I am a grown ( old ) woman with experience dealing with loans, credit cards, mortgages, even do my own taxes .. Can only imagine the what they do to these poor kids just out of college. Navient also does not honor their agreements ... they tell you one thing, then they do another. I agreed in XX/XX/XXXX to 15 years, verified payment amount .. then get letter with different info, longer term, lower payment!!

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-25
Company: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FNIS)
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Other personal consumer report
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
chex systems has not removed my information off there reporting system. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX has claimed there was fraud on my account which there was not due to the privacy act my rights have been violated claiming this information this account was closed on XX/XX/2018 ive disputed this item several times and no resolution has happened

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-01-14
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: CA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Other mortgage
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure

Complaint:
Between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX Bank of America and their business partners, representatives and third party agents have colluded and conspired to defraud of my home and property by circumventing the rules of real estate, mortgages, loans, debt, and contracts. 

Specifically, Bank of America has intentionally withheld material information regarding the true status of my home loan mortgage account AND deliberately set out on a planned course of action to deceive, coerce, defraud, humiliate, and intimidate in their efforts to separate me from my home while pretending to engage in loss mitigation processes for years at a time and receiving monetary assistance from tax payers of the state and federal governments of the United States of America during such a scheme. 

Collusion occurs when two persons or representatives of an entity or organization make an agreement to deceive or mislead another. Such agreements are usually secretive, and involve fraud or gaining an unfair advantage over a third party, competitors, consumers or others with whom they are negotiating. 

A criminal conspiracy exists when two or more people agree to commit almost any unlawful act, then take some action toward its completion. The action taken need not itself be a crime, but it must indicate that those involved in the conspiracy knew of the plan and intended to break the law. One person may be charged with and convicted of both conspiracy and the underlying crime based on the same circumstances. 

104 ) Collusion 105 ) Conspiracy All previously mentioned resolutions are desired and mandatory.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-12-16
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: FL
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Settlement process and costs

Complaint:
Approximately four months ago I initiated a loan with Bank of America through a man named XXXX XXXX, the application number was XXXX. Bank of America assigned a closing date of XXXX XXXX. We requested this to be moved up to XXXX XXXX and they ignored that request. On XXXX XXXX and XXXX I was contacted by XXXX XXXX XXXX of Bank of America saying- after all of the underwriters had approve the loan previously- that they needed more information. The information they needed was assurance that I had more than {$40000.00} in cash reserves. I do most all of my banking at Bank of America and have roughly {$350000.00} available to me and Bank of America has access these accounts. The next day- one day prior to closing - XXXX XXXX contacted me again and said they had noted a payment to XXXX timeshares I own and I had to explain this to them. I own XXXX timeshares and I get bills every year like anyone who owns a timeshare and I paid them. I sent this information to them with a promise that we would close shortly the next day today XXXX XXXX. On Friday, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX was not available nor washis supervisor. I then talked to another person, XXXX XXXX XXXX, who indicated that he would take that information and send it to the underwriter and that we would not be able to close on Monday but possibly Tuesday or Wednesday. The rate lock expires on XXXX XXXX. I fear that Bank of America after having this loan application for four months is now intentionally delaying the closure until the rate lock expires on XXXX XXXX, in order to renegotiate the loan in light of XXXX of the Federal Reserve indicating that rates will go up. I hope I am incorrect in this but I do need some assistance from someone with more clout than I have to get this loan closed in a timely fashion. I have spoken to an independent attorney and an independent mortgage broker both of whom indicate that the material they request is absurdly inconsequential and they feel the bank is not acting in good faith.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-08-30
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: NY
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Account opening, closing, or management

Complaint:
My checking account has no overdraft protection and I explicitly declined it before. However, I was still charged a {$35.00} overdraft fee by the bank.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-04-28
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: MD
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Home equity loan or line of credit
Issue: Credit decision / Underwriting

Complaint:
Was denied a home equity line of credit after a 2 1/2 month application period in which I was continuously asked to provide additional income, tax return information and supporting documentation. Due to the extreme length of time to make a decision, Bank of America has pulled XXXX credit reports which has reduced my credit score and prevented me from being able to apply through another lender. I was told that my debt to income ratio was too high and credit score too low to be approved. This decision was reached after a 2 and a half month process? Had this decision been conveyed in a reasonable time frame I would have been able to apply through a different financial institution without additional credit being pulled and reducing my credit score. Every time the bank has asked for additional documentation, it was provided by my wife and I in a timely fashion. I would ask that the board investigate both the reasons for loan denial since it was not clearly explained and why the process took 2 and a half months to make a decision after telling me that my income, debt to income ratio and credit were not an issue.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-11-26
Company: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
State: FL
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Settlement process and costs

Complaint:
This is very simple, but seems to be complex. I had a mortgage with Wells Fargo for 11 years, and never missed a payment. I refinanced XX/XX/XXXX, and have had this mortgage with Wells Fargo for over a year, and never missed a payment. So far, so good, right? I can not get XXXX or XXXX to reflect that the XXXX Mortgage was for 11 years ... .they show the dates, but on XXXX , neither XXXX or XXXX show 11 years credit, and that is what I need on my report ... .longevity is important to show my good history. 
Wells Fargo show the years XXXX-XXXX, but the XXXX are not showing.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation