Consumer complaint received 2019-11-28
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: SC
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Problem with personal statement of dispute

Complaint:
I STARTED OFF ATTACK THESE INCONSISTENT ACCOUNTS IN XX/XX/XXXX MANY REMAINED AND I FIND THAT INCONSISTENT WITH THE REPUTATION OF THE 3 MAIN CREDIT BUREAUS ( TRANSUNION, XXXX, XXXX ) TO REPORT MY INFORMATION THAT IS ACCURATE CONSISTENT AND VERIFIABLE HOWEVER MY CREDIT SCORE IS SUFFERING BECAUSE THEIR ARE MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS THAT IS PASSED MY STATES STATUE OF LIMITATIONS ON WRITTEN CONTRACTS. 

WHICH MEANS NOT ONLY ARE THESE NEGATIVE ACCOUNTS INACCURATE BECAUSE THE WAY THEY ARE REPORTING BUT THEY ARE INACCURATE FOR EVEN BEING REPORTED AT ALL. 

SOUTH CAROLINA LAWS GOVERN THAT THE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS ON WRITTEN CONTRACTS IS THREE YEARS YET I HAVE PROOF THAT THE CREDIT BUREAUS ALLOWS THESE CREDITORS AND COLLECTION AGENCIES TO CONTINUE TO REPORT INACCURATE AND UNLAWFUL INFO ON MY CREDIT REPORT WHICH IS INDEED A VIOLATION OF THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT. 

XXXX XXXX US DEPT VETS XXXX U.S. DEPT OF VETS AFFAIR XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX   XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX   XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX UNIVERSITY OF XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX   XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, AZ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX, XXXX It appears that attempts to collect a potentially time-barred debt that is otherwise valid may not necessarily Violate the Act so long as there is no actual or threatened litigation. ( See Freyermuth v. Credit Bureau SeNices ( 2001 ) 248 F.3d 767. ) However, where, as here, a collection action is instituted, there is a violation of the Act. ( See Kimber v. Federal Fin'l Corp. ( 1987 ) 668 F. Supp. 1480 ; McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger ( 2008 ) 587 F.Supp.2d 1170. ) All of these Accounts Report with various INACCURACIES! AND INCONSISTENCIES WHETHER IT MAY BE THE DATE OPEN, THE DATE OF LAST ACTIVITY OR DATE OF LAST PAYMENT, VARIOOUS CHARGEOFFS AND COLLECTIONS ARE LISTED UNDER THE WRONG ACCOUNT TYPE CODE ALL OF THE DATA VARIES FROM BUREAU TO BUREAU WHICH MAKES IT INCONSISTENT YOU HAVE VARIOUS CHARGEOFFS AND COLLECTIONS REPORTING A BALANCE WITH A PAST DUE BALANCE HOW CAN YOU REPORT BOTH IF THE BALANCE WAS CHARGEOFF, THE HISTORICAL PAYMENT GRIDS ARE ENTIRELY INACCURATE AND UNVERIFIABLE Credit bureaus, if they refuse to correct information after being provided proof of inaccuracy FCRA Section 623 CUSHMAN, v. TRANS UNION CORPORATION US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court Case 115 F.3d 220 June 9, 1997, Filed ( D.C. No. 95-cv- 01743 ).

U.S. Code1692e.False or misleading representations

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation