Consumer complaint received 2019-03-03
Company: BB&T CORPORATION
State: NC
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Opening an account
Sub-issue: Account opened as a result of fraud

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX was formed in XXXX NC in XXXX. The Sole Owner is XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX opened a Checking account at a BB & T Branch in XXXX NC near XXXX XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Some time in XXXX at a Local VA BB & T Branch 2 depository /checking accounts was illegal opened in the name of XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX . The SOLE owner XXXX XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX did not open these accounts nor did be sign for them to be opened. If he had signed for them he would CLEARLY been a Signatory to them. Since the XXXX itself is incapable of walking into a Branch and Opening an account. Common Sence would prevail that ONLY XXXX XXXX XXXX can open accounts on behalf of his SOLE owned XXXX. Other CFPB disputes provided the Articles of Corporation Documents. BB & T states that I am not a Signatory to those 2 Fraudulent Accounts opened in the name of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Their claim is totally debunked, however they are correct that " I wouldn't be a Signatory to them ''. This 110 % proves my case that these accounts where in FACT opened by XXXX, with BB & T by negligence and Fraud. BB & T was grossly negligent in not clarifying or even so much as looking at a single public record of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. They just blindly handed to XXXX not one but two Depository and Checking accounts in the name of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Once XXXX XXXX XXXX obtained these 2 Checking accounts, he was in sole custody of the needed tools, which he then used to write checks made out to CASH. He then had them CASHED by XXXX XXXX and other local VA Branch Tellers. Mr. XXXX also had the statements going directly to his Home Address and from XXXX and he managed to remove XXXX CASH totally XXXX and an additional XXXX or more when XXXX was allowed to close them out even after I reported this SAR to XXXX XXXX the XXXX VA Branch President at the time during XXXX time frame. BB & T has continued to commit Fraud, Fabrication lies, cover up fraud and forgeries. BB & T has further asserted unbelievable claims that it is protecting the account holder. If it was in the name of the XXXX and we know it was by its captured deposited incomes from the XXXX name going into these accounts. They should be held legal and FDIC insured liable to the XXXX itself and it rightful owner XXXX XXXX XXXX. These accounts where established by fraud and BB & T was grossly negligent in its " Due diligence '' in protecting the LLC from being defrauded and essentially Robbed of ALL it's working capital in these Distributions of Its XXXX cash. This cash was handed out by its local tellers at its VA Branches to XXXX XXXX XXXX. In Fact BB & T further took an addition reported XXXX from XXXX, whilst both of them where named Co-Defendants in pending Civil Litigation filed cases that was timely lodged in XXXX VA Circuit Court, later moved to XXXX County Circuit Courts by XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX followed these cases to XXXX County Circuit Court. These cases where filed back in XXXX and have been repeatedly blocked and denied any " Due Process '' of litigation on the merits to date. That's because they all know it's a Fraud and a Lie by design to cover up BB & T 's liabilities for the destruction of a XXXX XXXX Dollar XXXX back in XXXX. BB & T has been evasive, grossly negligent, and boldly has stuck to a indefensible assertion that it did not error. WoW BB & T. Your CEO Line Staff is totally out of line and is trying to continuously cover this up with CFPB, despite the fact that they Fined XXXX XXXX for doing exactly the same things in which BB & T has done here in this case. Why is that?

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation