Consumer complaint received 2015-08-16
Company: Solomon and Solomon, P.C.
State: CT
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Non-federal student loan
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Need information about my balance/terms

Complaint:
I received a collection notice from Solomon and Solomon P.C. of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX regarding a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX loan that was apparently originated around XXXX. I have not received any information about the original loan, no copies of the original loan application or documents and no proof that this loan is indeed my responsibility, but it is certainly not my personal debt since I have n't been a student since XXXX. I have helped my XXXX sons get through college, however, and XXXX of them did attend college in XXXX until XXXX, but again, I have n't received any original loan information, so I have no way of knowing if this is his debt. All I have received is collection notices demanding {$22000.00} of which they now claim {$21000.00} is principal and {$430.00} interest. In XXXX XXXX, they claimed {$12000.00} was principal and {$7500.00} interest. In XXXX, they raised the interest to {$7800.00}. So now they 've changed the interest due into principal due. 
Secondly, in XXXX XXXX, Solomon and Solomon served me with a Civil Summons for which I had to file an " Appearance '' with the " CLERK, SUPERIOR COURT, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX '' by XXXX XXXX, XXXX, which I did. I also sent Solomon and Solomon a copy of my " Appearance '' form. They then asked the court for a " Motion For Default - Failure To Plead ''. The court responded thus : " The foregoing, having been considered by the clerk, is hereby : ORDER : DENIED. The person sought to be defaulted is not a party to this case ''. Then on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, Solomon and Solomon filed yet another " MOTION FOR DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD '' with the court against me for " failure to file an Answer in this matter ''. I have n't been asked to plead to anything. The only action requested of me was to file an " Appearance '' by XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. Since I have n't been told anything about the original loan and nothing about how I may have acquired this debt, I consider this not only heavy-handed, but also a devious tactic because they are requesting something that has already been denied, perhaps in hopes that the court will inadvertently contradict its prior ruling. 
XXXX, I am considered " Totally and Permanently XXXX '' by the XXXX and also by the XXXX. To continually harass a XXXX American over a debt he knows nothing about is outrageous. I am considering what options I may have against Solomon and Solomon for their intimidating tactics and constant correspondence demanding more and more money including attorneys fees and absurd interest charges ( that somehow turn into principal debt ). 
I will gladly forward copies of any paperwork I have regarding this matter as well as proof of my XXXX status. Thank you for taking the time to review my information. Please help me if you can.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief