Consumer complaint received 2016-04-07
Company: Ocwen Financial Corporation
State: MD
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Mortgage
Issue: False statements or representation
Sub-issue: Attempted to collect wrong amount

Complaint:
ocwen have continue to sent false information and Representative. most recently on XXXX XXXX i received affidavit of lost note ... ... .. on a recorded phone conversation i was told by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Ocwen Ombudsman Team of office of WE DO NOT HAVE THE original NOTE YOUR NOTE IS LOST SEE attached affidavit of lost note date XXXX/XXXX/XXXX your original note is still missing.. the affidavit does not have the first name of the notary ( Minnesota require notary name to appear as the would on drivers licence, the signer XXXX XXXX, no first name ..the allege check of the first box, personally known not the second box, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX both signature are missing first name ... i did not sign my loan with first national bank of Nevada ... .but with first national bank of Arizona, two separate entities. 
i said why is these law firm XXXX XXXX XXXX Are co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners? XXXX XXXX XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ... .. created fraud original note when they have admitted from ocwen ombudsman team XXXX XXXX on a record conversation we do not have the note ... your original note is missing that why I sent you this lost note affidavit of lost note, what we have in the recorded conversation he said .. is just scanned image copy we do not have the original note .. so the original ( the law firm of XXXX. XXXX was not in fact original but colored copy of created to show it was the original XXXX XXXX XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ) he said we do not have the original note, is still missing I sent you a letter dated XXXX XXXX XXXX ... your original note is still missing ..your original note is missing see lost note affidavit ... lost note affidavit signer are missing first name of all signer, the notary does have a first name, the signer does not have the first name, the bank is wrong WHEN COMPARE TO DIGITAL IMAGE OF scanned NOTE XXXX XXXX SENT DATE XXXX XXXX he said. Your note is lost we do not have the original, all we have is what I sent to digital image scanned attached to the letter and lost note to confirm your note is missing fraud created document backdated to show standing by XXXX XXXX XXXX $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Pattern of fraud with XXXX ( the law firm of XXXX. XXXX was not in fact original but colored copy created to show it was the original BY XXXX XXXX XXXX co conspiracy filing fraudulent foreclosure complaints with the courts of the State of Maryland and the County Clerks to deceive the Courts and clerks into believing they are accepting proper legal papers to obtain judgments against homeowners ) Is the conduct of Defendants illegal, unlawful and criminal to which they are engaging in a racket against the public and the judiciary that causes homeowners to unlawfully lose their homes, money to CO CONSPIRACY XXXX or XXXX and/or engage in litigation to defend themsleves against false filings by CO CONSPIRACY XXXX or XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation