BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2016-12-27
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: SD
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Reinserted previously deleted info

Complaint:
I successfully disputed inaccurate derogatory information reported on my credit report by Transunion. The account was reported by Transunion as deleted deleted on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. The report was electronic and I have retained a screenshot of the report of deletion. 

At a later date, the disputed account was reinserted by Transunion, with an altered closed date of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, after six years of inactivity and with no change in status. The original reported closed date was XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, six years earlier. 

I called Transunion to dispute the reinserted account on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, the date of discovery. I had been regularly checking my credit report and the reinserted information did not appear until this past month apparently, at an unknown date. 

I spoke with XXXX representatives of Transunion who indicated ( 1 ) no letter notifying me of reinsertion was sent to me and ( 2 ) Transunion has a policy of not notifying persons of reinsertions of accounts. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires a credit reporting to notify a person of a reinsertion of a previously deleted account within five ( 5 ) days of the rejnsertion. In this case at least five ( 5 ) days have passed, and no notice has been sent or received. 

Transunion has indicated that they will not delete the reinserted information if the creditor claims it is accurate, even if the information contained in the report is inconsistent with the previous report of the account. Transunion has additionally stated they have and will continue to violate the FCRA. I wish to have the reinserted account deleted, and to receive a letter admitting wrongdoing and confirming that the account will not be reinserted in the future.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-04-13
Company: ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
State: TX
Product: Consumer Loan
Sub-product: Vehicle loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease

Complaint:
Since Ally Financial has taken over both my car loan and my husbands, we have had nothing but problems. When they took over for GMAC, I had no late fees on my account and then suddenlty with ALLY I continually have late fees. I have written them time and time again but to no avail. They now call all the time either for my husband and myself or just for my husband on my personal phone. I have sent them proof of payment any number of times but am continually harrassed with phone calls. They even attemped to have my car repossessed even though I had proof of payments. Now my husband has not received a statement from them since XXXX and now I am not receiving any statements for several months. Enough is enough. Almost every day I have to block their calls. 
Some agency needs to take a look at these poor financial practices by Ally. We never had problems with GMAC. I am sure that with all the late fees they tack on, my credit will be hurt. When I send them proof of payment, they never acknowledge anything.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-01-17
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
My wallet was stolen on XXXX XXXX 2016 with all my information social security, debit and credit cards, Drivers license. The perps have used my social to open credit card accounts under my name I 've reported the situation to the credit bureaus I 've placed a fraud alert and only transunion has deleted the fraudulent inquiries I 've had about XXXX inquiries since XXXX XXXX and XXXX account was opened. I 've reported this to the FTC and my local police I 'm a victim of identity fraud and I need help. The perpetrators address has been added to my own credit report as if it 's mine.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-19
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: LA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Unable to get credit report/credit score
Sub-issue: Problem getting report or credit score

Complaint:
I have not been able to resolve my credit score issue with Transunion. I have been working with them since XXXX XXXX to resolve correcting my SSN # and DOB on my credit report. TU has mixed up my brother 's and my credit report which caused me not to be able to close on my home in time. I recieved the run around. I have called MULTIPLE times with no resolution and no call back from a supervisor. Their latest excuse is that it is a " computer issue. '' Because of Transunion 's error, my bank is unable to pull a credit report. The credit report has my brother 's information on it causing my score to be falsely low.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-09-23
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
XXXX, XXXX SOC SEC # XXXX DOB XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXXTransUnion Consumer Solutions, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX. 

I recently submitted a request for investigation of an Acct Number : XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX ACC # XXXX XXXX ACC # XXXX XXXX ACC # XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX # : XXXX XXXXI 've submitted enough information regarding the fraudulent account that 's open in my name I have provided information for your company to have carried out a reasonable investigation of this dispute. If you had investigated properly rather then using your XXXX system you would have noticed that this account is not mine which your companies have claimed to " Verified ''. Since you 've obviously neglected to investigate this account thoroughly I am demanding you remove this account off my profile. It is at this time that I will point out the in XXXX XXXX TransUnion, XXXX v. XXXX ( XXXX ), and XXXX v. XXXX, XXXX et, the courts ruled each and every time that the CRA could n't merely " Parrot '' information from the creditors and collection agencies ... that they have conduct an independent REASONABLE investigation to ensure the validity of the debt and honesty/integrity of the creditors/CA in question. Sending out a generic form through the XXXX system that does n't even contain my reasons for the dispute is not reasonable. 

If you do n't initiate an investigation regarding my dispute, as it is my right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, I will have to take legal action to protect my credit rating and myself. Which I 'm sure you are aware each violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows damages of {$1000.00} should this matter ends up in court. 
I look forward to an expedite resolution of this matter Thank you. 
XXXX, XXXX SOC SEC # XXXX DOB XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-05-15
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Information is not mine

Complaint:
There is a new employment added to my credit report that I have never worked for and I had like XXXX cards open in my name sent to me that I did not apply for using that new employment. I have paid off most of those credit cards. But I want new employment taking off my credit and all the inquires from this year. Someone has used my information before that 's why when I file for taxes I have input a code. But all of these new inquires and credit cards have really lowered my credit score. I 'm currently unemployed.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-02-08
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NC
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account status

Complaint:
The last payment on this account was XX/XX/XXXX.XXXX claim the last payment XX/XX/XXXX I wrote XXXX a letter asking for a payment identifier for the last payment the only thing i got was who the account was sold to so i contacted XXXX XXXX at XXXX ext- XXXX and spoke with XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX she advised me that XXXX XXXX do n't have the account. How can XXXX report to the credit bureaus the last payment but they cant send me the last payment identifier..

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-12-22
Company: Mortgage One Solutions, Inc.
State: MD
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Other type of mortgage
Issue: Closing on a mortgage

Complaint:
As a seller I signed and closed my documents on XX/XX/XXXX. My house had been vacant since XXXX and the process had taken a while. On XXXX the buyer was not able to close because the buyers cash deposit was not accepted. This should have been discussed a while back. The buyer now and me the seller are in a waiting game with this lender. The lender is not responsive to my realtor and to the title company. The lending company is lending XXXX or mortgage one solutions in XXXX virginia. Their address is. Their XXXX  and XXXX reviews will tell you to stay away from them. The fact that they are not responsive with something like a home sale is disturbing and as a consumer I urge for this company to be audited and reviewed.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-12-21
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: MN
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Private student loan
Issue: Dealing with your lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Trouble with how payments are being handled

Complaint:
Every year when it comes time for the Income Driven Renewal the federal loans are are renewed correctly. When the FFELP loans are in need of renewal which is at a later date than the federal loans Navient claims new forms need to filed. The link in the Online Account communication for renewal of the Income Driven Repayment for FFELP loans provided by Navient in the online account sends the person to the Federal Student Aid website which already has the information in their data base for the filing of the federal loans which renewed a few months before. Navient claims that this information can not be used and new forms need to filed for FFELP which leaves the consumer in confusion. The link Navient provides in the account directs the consumer to the Student Aid site but Navient claims the information submitted isn't valid and that a new form must be completed. I do not see how Navient is following federal guidelines if they are deciding what information and forms can and can not be submitted when federal guidelines provide them with direction for renewal. I submitted the information to the Federal Student Aid website in XX/XX/XXXX for the XXXX year. The FFELP loan needs the information submitted by XX/XX/XXXX for the 2021 year. Navient refuses to use the information submitted although the Federal Student Aid website states the information submitted is good for one year and needs to renewed at the next renewal date. I called and spoke with a service agent on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX in which I was told new forms had to filed for the FFELP program which the Federal Student Aid website does not state.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2015-10-29
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Account status

Complaint:
Prior to declaring Bankruptcy-Chapter XXXX, which was filed XXXX/XXXX/2011 and discharged in XXXX of 2011, ( Docket # XXXX ) our account with XXXX XXXX was kept current every month, paid on time each month and never paid late.. 
Our recent credit report shows that Transunion has reported this account was past due for 75 days. 
We request that the past due column be changed to show a XXXX ... ..never paid late.

Company public response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-08
Company: RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing LLC
State: MO
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional fixed mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Complaint:
On XX/XX/XXXX, I asked my mortgage company ( RoundPoint Mortgage ) not to send a real estate tax check to the city of XXXX XXXX because I had already paid it. On XX/XX/XXXX, they acknowledged this and said my request was being processed and they would contact me if any additional information was needed. They never contacted me ( indicating they did n't need additional information. On XX/XX/XXXX, they sent a real estate tax check of {$4300.00} to the city of XXXX XXXX instead of following the acknowledged request not to do so. On XX/XX/XXXX, I filed a complaint through their online message system. On XX/XX/XXXX, they acknowledged receipt of the message and said they would forward it to the appropriate department. It has been 30 days since my complaint and my money is still missing ( not in my escrow account ). No other communication from RoundPoint has been made other than the email acknowledging my complaint on XX/XX/XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-09
Company: KEYCORP
State: CT
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Home equity loan or line of credit
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Complaint:
I have a HELOC loan initially opened at XXXX XXXX Bank in XXXX. First Niagara Bank bought XXXX XXXX Bank in XXXX and took over the loan. Key Bank bought First Niagara in XXXX, and then assumed the loan from them. Since Key Bank began servicing the loan, there have been nothing but problems. The most serious of those problems is that Key Bank has been reporting the loan to the credit reporting agencies incorrectly since they assumed the note. I have contacted Key dozens of times over the span of 4 months to try to get them to fix it. Each time they tell me that they are reporting the loan correctly or give some other excuse. They are not reporting correctly. They are reporting the outstanding principal balance as the credit limit, instead of reporting the actual credit limit. This is causing the credit bureaus to report my debt to credit ratio as 100 %, which is negatively impacting my credit score. The actual debt to credit ratio is less than 70 %. They also do not have the correct dates listed for the loan. 
The " Executive '' customer service team looked into the problem and finally came to the conclusion that Key Bank " HAS '' to report the loan incorrectly and have the incorrect dates because the type of loan that I have did n't fit into the computer billing system of Key when they assumed it, so they modified the data to get it to bill correctly. According to them, the damage to my credit and the wrong reporting is an " unfortunate, unintended consequence '' of what they need to do to get the billing correct. They have stated that they do not have a way to correct this problem and have no intention of doing so. And after four months of it being incorrect and of me complaining, they told me not to contact Key Bank about this issue. I tried to escalate it beyond this level, but was told that there is no escalation, and I could not even deal with anyone else in that department. All decisions made by the " Executive Team '' are final and are made by only XXXX person who answers to no one and has no supervisor ( supposedly ). The choices I was given were live with the problems or find a different bank. 
I am sure there are numerous other customers who have the same type of loan that was initiated by XXXX XXXX bank that are in the same predicament.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-11
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: SC
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Credit reporting company's investigation
Sub-issue: Investigation took too long

Complaint:
Over 90 days ago I wrote Transunion and demanded proof of the negative items that are on my credit report. I asked for proof of the alleged debt, including specifically the alleged contract or other instrument bearing my signature. So far none of them has been able to provide such proof to me. I have sent follow-up letters and there is still no proof. I have attempted phone contact, but I simply get transferred around and nothing ever gets accomplished. 
I have fully investigated my rights in this matter. Under the doctrine of estoppel by silence, XXXX v XXXX ( Mo ) XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I may presume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact exists. I have copies of the certified letters and dates prepared to bring to court.. Also, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, these disputed items may not appear on my credit report if they can not be supported by any evidence. 
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, if they can not verify the debt within 30 days, then it must be removed. Your letters to me claim to have " verified '' the debt, but this is in fact not true under law. Simply contacting the alleged creditor and asking them to match up numbers in their database is no sufficient verification.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-02-15
Company: ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
State: FL
Product: Consumer Loan
Sub-product: Vehicle lease
Issue: Managing the loan or lease

Complaint:
A leased car was returned to Ally Financial with all leased payments made. Ally inspected the car and stated that the " Key Fob '' did not work and have now billed me {$130.00} for a new fob. My concerns are : I returned the car to the dealer and the dealer made the remaining payments, car returned on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, inspection of car made XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, all fobs worked on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ( last time I saw the car ), I was never present at the XXXX/XXXX/XXXX inspection, do n't know if it needed a battery, or if it was the correct fob. Inspection report attached. 
Called Ally on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and was told that I would be contacted in a few days, no contact was received, only the second letter which is attached. Ally assigned incident number XXXX to my call.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-04
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
It appears that my credit file has been compromised. Again, I was going through my records & noticed many information, accounts or items which do not belong to me. Since Im a stickler for research, I found that under section 605b of the FCRA you are required by law to remove & block any accounts or information which is found to be opened due to identity theft. The dispute items do not belong to me. Im attaching the required FTC Report for you and the bank 's records ( learned through more research both parties require ). Please block/remove these files. 
XXXXXXXX XXXX  # XXXX XXXX XXXX, TX XXXX XX/XX/2012 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX TX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX TX XXXX DP OF EDUC XXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Balance : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Balance : {$1000.00} XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$940.00} If you feel there is a possibility these items belong to me I will require all documentation that bears my signature ( another research item I found that requires you to verify with 100 % accuracy that each items are 100 % true, accurate, correct, complete & VERIFIABLE ). If you do not provide any records & claim the item is verified please understand I will seek legal action. I do not take kindly to games nor does my attorney. SO please comply with the law so this matter can be handled swiftly.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-16
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Sub-issue: Reinserted previously deleted info

Complaint:
Transunion had a glitch in their system that violated the rights of their consumers under section 6.11. As a result, I have been gravely affected and my score is suffering as a result. No notice was ever given which is also a violation and I am requesting that ALL inquiries will be removed.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-25
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MO
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
This is the several times I've complained about being a victim of identity theft. The 3 credit bureaus must remove any item that was opened without my knowledge, consent, or authority within 4 business days with ( 1 ) appropriate proof of the identity of the consumer ; ( 2 ) a copy of an identity theft report ; ( 3 ) the identification of such information by the consumer; and ( 4 ) a statement by the consumer that the information is not information relating to any transaction by the consumer. 
XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$1200.00} ; XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$220.00} ; XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$860.00} ; XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$6800.00} ; XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation