BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2021-10-03
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint:
On three occasions I have requested credit increases or inquiries and both agencies below continue to report information wrong. My first issue was with XXXX in which XXXX XXXX reported derogatory or public record. For over a year I tried to get a XXXX card until i finally disputed with them, they sent sent two reports that showed no derogatory record, within a week XXXX issued my new card. 

Now XXXX XXXX has sent me a denial showing Equifax as the consumer reporting agency. As i type this my current score on their own web page is XXXX yet they report XXXX to XXXX XXXX they also show derogatory public record which is linked directly to XXXX XXXX. 

Both companies have been advised on two occasions about the lack of reporting accuracy. I am requesting that the CFPB please get involved, I run a small business and this greatly effects me and does not seem to stop. 

Request for credit requested XX/XX/2021 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX Equifax XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX GA XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-20
Company: Newman, Hesse & Associates, P. A.
State: KS
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: I do not know
Issue: Disclosure verification of debt
Sub-issue: Right to dispute notice not received

Complaint:
I unknowingly wrote a bad {$40.00}. check for groceries at a very prosperous business ( and still is ) 18 years ago. The first collection agency had the case from XXXX to XXXX. The second collection agency has the case currently since XXXX. I live in Kansas. They garnished my check in XXXX, but I had to be at home for personal reason and had to quit. First, they contacted me at my place of employment, which they deny. I answered the phone at work, asked my name. I asked who they were, and they hung up on me. It was a number from their same city of their business. Then I get notice that I 'm getting garnished not even a week and a half later. I did not receive notice of right to dispute this amount. No time of hearing. All I received was notice that they went to court and got approved by the judge to garnish. I called them, and they informed me that they have renewed the case every time they were supposed to keep it from being time-barred. XXXX and XXXX They did not keep within the time allotted to renew. It went dormant. XXXX Kansas law allows a recovery fee charge, court costs, up to 3 times the original amount of the check, but it can not exceed XXXX. They are taking out the maximum amount from my check every week. 25 %. The amount they are telling me I have to pay is {$1000.00}, all from a XXXX dollar check. I believe the amount they are making me pay, and leading me to believe I cant dispute because " the judge granted them that amount '' is outrageous, and they already have taken out atleast XXXX from me. I have XXXX children to care for. This is insane.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-27
Company: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: TX
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem when making payments
Sub-issue: You never received your bill or did not know a payment was due

Complaint:
Capital One XXXX, XXXX .... 
The basis for my dispute is ALLEGED balance of - was required to notify me prior to X/XX/2015, or no later than 30 days after Capital Onefailed to notify me about reporting derogatory info. to XXXX, and In section 603 ( p ) 15 U.S.C. ss 168s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( A ) ( I ) ; The notice required under subparagraph ( A ) shall be provided to the customer prior to, or no later than 30 days after, furnishing the negative derogatory 30, 60,90,120, 150, CO information to a consumer reporting agency described in section 603 ( p ), 15 U.S.C. ss 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( B ) ( I ). Plus broke commercial law under UCC 9.501 that all notices were timely and properly given by dated certified mail receipt. They were not met. I asked for documentation & received no response. 
Also, Capital One '' failed to give me my " Mini-Miranda '' five days prior to placing this derogatory item on all of my credit reports, per Section 807 ( 11 ) & FDCPA 809, which is {$1000.00} per violation and the state of TX allows treble damages. 
Under 809. Validations of date and Mini-Mirandi under Section 807 ( 1 ) Capital One failed to send me my initial communication before placing this alleged derogatory 30, 60,90,120, 150, CO status on my credit reports further violating the FCRA, I understand that according to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, failing to provide this notice can result in a penalty up to {$2500.00} and can be enforced by the FTC, and that my state attorney general can also enforce this with a {$1000.00} penalty as well. 
I attached a copy of the law and the actual document from the federal reserve Capital One is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of TX a creditor is who collects their on debt is considered a debt collector under FDCPA. XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Tex.App-XXXX XXXX XXXX reh.den. ) citing XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXXDallas XXXX writ dism 'd w.o.j. )

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-09-29
Company: Better Mortgage, Inc.
State: TX
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Applying for a mortgage or refinancing an existing mortgage

Complaint:
Better.com refuses to provide credit DTI calculation information why they have adjusted the original Loan Estimate that I agreed to move forward with. XXXX XXXX, Processing Expert, NMLS # XXXX, called me at XXXX XXXX CST on XX/XX/2020 on a recorded line and refused to provide accurate calculation information. Then he hung up on me while I was demanding fair lending information to show why my loan was being declined.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-10-14
Company: CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
State: AZ
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: FHA mortgage
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account

Complaint:
On XXXX/XXXX/16, I received a Payoff Statement from Carrington Mortgage Services of {$570.00} valid until XXXX/XXXX/16. I paid that amount through XXXX online banking. XXXX XXXX XXXX sent that amount on XXXX/XXXX/16 for delivery on XXXX/XXXX/16. A letter from Carrington dated XXXX/XXXX/16 stated Carrington did not receive my XXXX/XXXX/16 payment and that I owed {$550.00} which included a late charge. I immediately called Carrington and informed them I sent them the loan payoff amount and faxed them a copy of my online banking statement. I also contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX Online Banking. On XXXX/XXXX/16. a XXXX XXXX XXXX representative and myself called Carrington and XXXX XXXX XXXX faxed Carrington proof of my payment. XXXX from Carrington told us they located the funds XXXX XXXX XXXX sent. A letter from Carrington dated XXXX/XXXX/16, stated they located the {$570.00} and it was posted to my loan as the XXXX payment with an effective date of XXXX/XXXX/16. On XXXX/XXXX/16, I called Carrington again and spoke to XXXX and informed her the {$570.00} was the Payoff Statement amount and should be applied as such. She put me on hold to speak to someone else. She then told me I should not worry, the funds would be sent to the cashiering dept. I could consider the mortgage paid off. On XXXX/XXXX/16, I received a Call from Carrington trying to collect a debt. I explained the whole thing to this woman and she found all the notes pertaining to this matter in my loan file. She said she 'd pass this to her supervisor for quick action. On XXXX/XXXX/16, I received a Notice of Intent to Foreclose from Carrington. I again called them speaking to the same woman as I did the day before. She informed me she would have her supervisor call me. It is becoming clear to me now that Carrington Mortgage Services, through incompetence and/or outright criminal activities, is trying to extort additional funds from me.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-03
Company: NCC Business Services, Inc.
State: CA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Other (i.e. phone, health club, etc.)
Issue: Cont'd attempts collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was discharged in bankruptcy

Complaint:
I went to apply at an apartment complex 1.5 months ago and they made a mistake and stated this debt XXXX from another apartment complex ( which I never owed anyway ) was still on my credit as unpaid ... later I looked at the credit report copy she gave me about 3 weeks later and it stated it was discharged in the bankruptcy and my father already paid this debt. And NCC lied and stated it was not included in the BK and I know they were notified last XXXX 2015 that it was, I wrote them 15x and the manager said he would refund my fathers card and he never did. I have proof of all documentation and even the credit report ....

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-27
Company: SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
State: NC
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage

Complaint:
Outstanding Escalated Suntrust Case # XXXX ( Foreclosure Initiated/Pending ) Suntrust Mortgage has failed to respond with a substance response specific to my Escalated Case # XXXX. This case was opened on XX/XX/XXXX. Suntrust issued a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX,  addressed to my wife and I, stating Suntrust mortgage services your mortgage loan and intends to initiate a foreclosure on the mortgaged property in the name of : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as Trustee for XXXX XXXX - XXXX ( Noteholder ). Noteholder can not locate the original promissory note and will seek to prove standing thought a lost note affidavit. Neither Suntrust or XXXX XXXX XXXX have provided the required lost note affidavit. I specifically filed my Escalated Case and requested where the lost note affidavit is supporting who the noteholder is. I understand I have protections against unnecessary foreclosure until Suntrust responds to this specific question and provides the required lost note affidavit as the servicer Suntrust has not resolved my Escalated Case, nor has Suntrust suspended the scheduled foreclosure sale set for tomorrow XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX. Its my understanding Suntrust must review each Escalated Case received from a requestor against the information and documentation in the servicing system and or mortgage file and determine the accuracy of the inquiry and reach a resolution. Its my understanding when a server receives an Escalated Case from a Requestor after a foreclosure sale date has been scheduled and the Escalated Case is received no later than midnight of the seventh business day prior to the foreclosure sale date ( Deadline ), the servicer must suspend the sale as necessary to resolve the Escalated Case. With this case being received on XX/XX/XXXX and a response that is specific to my request has not been received I am asking the CFPB to take action and force Suntrust to suspend tomorrows sale. I requested why the Lost Note Affidavit had not been supplied only after Suntrust sent me a letter informing me the NoteHolder had lost the note and would provide the required lost note affidavit necessary to establish standing. Here we are the day before the sale and that document has not been provided nor has Suntrust responded specifically to this still outstanding request. The CFPB should request the audio call files for the dates of XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX from the servicer and the CFPB will have a very clear idea of how Suntrust manipulates borrowers by informing the CFPB it has responded yet never specifically responded to the borrowers question. In this case, where is the lost note affidavit and why does Suntrust continue to refuse to provide this document? XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, NC XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-05-25
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I have disputed this XXXX XXXX XXXX on Transunion and it has not been corrected. The account is still reporting wrong on my credit report but it is already closed. The account has been closed however, the account payment status is 30 days late. The account payment status CAN NOT be 30 days late on an account that has been closed. The account status is wrong and should be closed. Now, I want you to correct this misinformation on my file XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-05-25
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I have disputed this XXXX XXXX XXXX on Equifax and it has not been corrected. The account is still reporting wrong on my credit report but it is already closed. The account has been closed however, the account payment status is 30 days late. The account payment status CAN NOT be 30 days late on an account that has been closed. The account status is wrong and should be closed. Now, I want you to correct this misinformation on my file XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-05-08
Company: AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
State: WA
Product: Credit card
Issue: Rewards

Complaint:
I had an American Express Gold card linked to a MR ( Membership Rewards ) account. In time I also got an American Express Everyday card and linked it to the same account. The MR account had a balance of around XXXX miles. 

I subsequently closed my Gold card. That is when the nightmare with Amex started, they closed my MR account as well stealing all XXXX of my points. I had to book a few air tickets which I was hoping to book using these miles but was not able to. In the meantime I travelled to XXXX and forgot about my misery. 

I returned and had to struggle to reinstate my account. Amex offered no explanation or compensation for not having my miles available to me when I needed to redeem them. I asked for compensation which was summarily ignored. 

I however noticed another issue, as per the contract of my Amex Everyday card, I was to receive XXXX points upon using the card to make {$1000.00} in purchases during the 1st 90 days. I completed these purchases, however again my points are not awarded to me. 

The Amex Membership Rewards department chooses to ignore all my tickets, I have escalated multiple times to managers who dont call back and the issue is still ongoing 3 months after it should have been resolved. I must have XXXX tickets filed for escalation and the MR department just never calls or tries to resolve them. 

I would like for Amex to acknowledge its errors and apologise in writing for closing my MR account without warning and for not making available my points for redemption when I needed them. 

I would also like for them to reimburse me the XXXX points I am legally entitled to immediately. 

I would also like for them to compensate me for : 1. Hardship caused to me due to all their errors. 
2. Not making my points available for redemption when I needed them 3. Making me run from pillar to post to claim something which I am legally entitled to as per contact.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-02-18
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Other personal consumer report
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing issue
Sub-issue: Investigation took more than 30 days

Complaint:
I mailed out a letter to Experian on XX/XX/2021 asking them to fix incorrect late payments. I haven't heard back from these two bureaus since I mailed out the letter. I provided documents with the payments on them to the bureaus showing I paid on time and they took no action. I have even previously asked them to verify with creditor that the payments I made were late to which I had no response. I want the payment regarding my XXXX account corrected to paid as agreed.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-02-18
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I paid my insurance bill as scheduled to XXXX. and they sent my information to a creditor and the account was already paid. They refused to delete the account from my report even after disputing and sending in proof.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2016-03-16
Company: SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Bank account or service
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
I wrote the attached check for {$7500.00} from my XXXX XXXX account and deposited it to my SunTrust account. Of material fact, is that I have used the same accounts to electronically transfer to and from in the past since approximately XXXX without any returned checks issues from my XXXX XXXX XXXX account. The extended hold is until XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. 
Notwithstanding, the above mentioned, although said check cleared my XXXX XXXX account on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, an unreasonable extended hold was placed on my check at SunTrust. I called the call center for assistance on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, however such was not fore coming. I was advised to visit a branch. Please note for the records that I am XXXX. ( my XXXX XXXX income goes to SunTrust via direct deposit so they could ascertain my claim of disability. ) and such advised the representative of the challenges I have to travel without extended planning. however, I was not offered an alternative option to resolve said. 

I called back the same day of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and spoke to XXXX management levels, including a XXXX XXXX XXXX, who denied my request to connect with the executive office for assistance. Of Material fact, I am very disappointed that SunTrust no longer has a direct contact information to its executive offices and am thus left at the mercy of the representatives to receive said. 
Please see the attached and feel free to reach me if with additional questions if required. Please advise. Thank you

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-05-25
Company: ORG GC GP Buyer, LLC
State: TN
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Auto debt
Issue: Communication tactics
Sub-issue: Frequent or repeated calls

Complaint:
XXXX**DEBT VALIDATION LETTER**** To Whom it May Concern : This letter is being sent to you in response to me regarding account # XXXX Be advised this is not a refusal to pay, but a notice sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g stating your claim is disputed and *VALIDATIONis requested. This is NOT a request for " verification '' or proof of my mailing address, made pursuant to the above-named Title and Section. I again respectfully request your offices provide me VALIDATION with evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay you, including the following documentation : 1. Agreement with the creditor that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt ; 2.The agreement bearing my signature stating that I have agreed to assume the debt ; 3.Valid copies of the debt agreement stating the amount of the debt and interest charges ; 4.Proof that the Statute of Limitations has not expired ; 5. Complete payment history on this account along with an accounting of all additional charges being assessed : Proof that you are licensed to collect in my state ; and 7. Your license numbers and Registered Agent. At this time, I will also inform you that if your offices have reported invalidated information to any of the 3 major credit bureaus ( XXXX, XXXX, or XXXX ) this action may constitute fraud under both Federal and State Laws. Due to this fact, if any negative mark is found on any of my credit reports by your company or the company that you represent, I will not hesitate in bringing legal action against you and your client for the following : Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and Defamation of Character. If your office fails to reply to this debt validation letter within XXXXhirty ( 30 ) days from the date of your receipt, all future attempts to collect on debt including excessive calling must cease, moreover credit report deletion. 

Sincerely, XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief