Consumer complaint received 2018-06-25
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
On XX/XX/XXXX I disputed all 3 credit Bureaus via postal service on account with XXXX XXXX account number XXXX asking for verification not validation of this debt because of its inaccuracies. It is my complete understanding that a debt placed on my personal credit report should be 100 percent accurate and verifiable at all time and must match. All 3 responded as the debt had been verified. I then sent another dispute to the credit bureus via certified mail on XX/XX/XXXX and the same response was given the debt was verified. I contacted the XXXX XXXX for documents and I havent received a response to date. I then filed a complaint with you all please see complaints # XXXX XXXX TRANSUNION-XXXX Most I recently disputed with all three ( 3 ) credit reporting agencies the accuracy of reporting on this tradeline, and the results came back either verified or updated ''. There are several inaccuracies across all three credit reporting agencies. I have attached copies of the reports that they are each reporting. i would like justification on what method of verification they used and why they are allowing these inaccurrates to continue to hinder my life. I am filing with the attorney general on XX/XX/XXXX and preparing for a lawsuit. As i have a solid paper trail of these discretions. 

*open dates are all conflicting *XXXX  is even claiming a payment of XXXX was made? How is that when its a charged off account. Which makes them all have incorrect balances? 
*Charge off accounts are acknowledgement that the debt is uncollectable and lets the IRS give a tax credit. So the balance would be XXXX. Each report is reporting a balance whether wrong or not. 
*HOW CAN A CHARGED OFF ACCOUNT THAT SHOULD BE REPORTING XXXX SHOW A PAST DUE BALANCE AND A BALANCE AMOUNT? 
That is clear vioation of myrigthts as of the consumber law 623. which states that Under the provisions of FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 8 ) ( E ) and 16 CFR 660.4,, you have the duty to review all of the information I have provided to you, to complete your investigation of this Direct Dispute within 30-days of my Notice of Direct Dispute, and report directly back to me the results of your investigation within 5-days of your completion of your investigation.

Should you find the disputed information to be inaccurate or incomplete, or if you can not verify the accuracy or completeness of the disputed information, you are additionally required, under FCRA 623 ( ( 1 ) ( E ), to also promptly notify the credit reporting agencies of deletion of this information from my credit file. 

XXXX v XXXX XXXX, XXXX provides a cause of action for individuals against furnishers of information. 


DELETE THIS UNVERIFIED ACCOUNT

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation