BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: SC
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-10-25
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: PA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
Affidavit of Demand by XXXX XXXX XXXX COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF UNITED STATES The undersigned, XXXX XXXX XXXX, being duly sworn, hereby deposes and says : 1. I am over the age of XXXX and am a resident of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. I have personal knowledge of the facts herein, and, if called as a witness, could testify completely thereto. 

2. I suffer no legal disabilities and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below. 

3. Date : XXXX/XXXX/XXXX Re : Letter to Remove Inaccurate Credit Information : To Whom It May Concern : I received a copy of my credit report and found the following item ( s ) to be errors. Here as follows are items in error : Creditor Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL, XXXX I am sending you a Letter of Demand Under Section 604 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. I see you put an inquiry on my credit report. Please provide me Permissible Purpose of your inquiry. Please provide me proof I consented to this inquiry via FCRA section 609 and 605 as well as the accuracy of this inquiry via FRCA section 623. Please provide me Written Authorization, the original contract copies of my signature that I initiated this Inquiry. I have been a victim of identity Theft. Please see my 10-page attachment ( Your Duties Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ) concerning Fair Credit Reporting Act sections 604 and 605B laws. By the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, I demand that these items be investigated and removed from my report. It is my understanding that you will recheck these items with the creditor who has posted them. Please remove any information that the creditor can not verify. I understand that under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681i ( a ), you must complete this re-investigation within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Please send an updated copy of my credit report to the above address. According to the act, there shall be no charge for this updated report. I also request that you please send notices of corrections to anyone who received my credit report in the past six months. 

FTC Identity Theft Report Number : XXXX Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, PA XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: CT
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting act XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, has violated my rights. 

15 U.S.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S.C 1681 Section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: SC
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2018-01-06
Company: CNG FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: IL
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Payday loan debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was already discharged in bankruptcy and is no longer owed

Complaint:
Opened a XXXX XXXX XXXX account in XXXX which was later closed and subsequently included in a now XXXX discharged Bankruptcy. Yet, the hired debt collector, XXXX XXXX XXXX, continues to inaccurately report this account as opened to credit bureaus. While there is {$0.00} liability, the unclosed debt record is negatively effecting my overall credit. I have submitted more than a dozen combined disputes to the 3 credit reporting agencies and I have contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX directly and with no response or updates to my credit reports. I have exhausted all options and I am reaching out in hopes this can be rectified and that XXXX XXXX XXXX will be penalized for inaccurately reporting my account. 

XXXX - XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Online Dispute XXXX - XXXX Phone Dispute XXXX - Letter to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX - Email to XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-10-05
Company: Convergent Resources, Inc.
State: GA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Other debt
Issue: False statements or representation
Sub-issue: Attempted to collect wrong amount

Complaint:
Based on Section 609 and 601 of the fcra and also USC 1611 this company he supposed to have proper debt validation in which when requested they could not provide therefore this account should be removed I've done no business with this entity please remove

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2021-09-07
Company: CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
State: NC
Product: Vehicle loan or lease
Sub-product: Loan
Issue: Struggling to pay your loan
Sub-issue: Loan balance remaining after the vehicle is repossessed and sold

Complaint:
Bad Warranty Car Vehicle was bought /signed for the amount of {$8300.00} from used car lot. My name was copied and pasted unto more paperwork stating that I would pay back double that amount. No way would I have signed for that. Within 1 month of purchasing the vehicle the car started acting funny. I took it back to the place and the one who sold me the vehicle no longer worked there. I do know " Lemon Law. '' The North Carolina Lemon Law, also known as the New Motor Vehicles Warranties Act ( N.C.G.S. It requires manufacturers to repair defects that affect the use, value, or safety of a new motor vehicle within the first 24 months or XXXX miles ( whichever comes first ). I was told that the car was sold " AS IS '' but I asked them where was the paperwork saying " As Is ''. I called Credit Acceptance and they said they couldn't do anything about the issue as well. 5 months down the line, the vehicle gave out at work. The car wouldn't start, the wheel wouldn't turn and also the wheel locked up. I called Credit Acceptance right than and there. As you look at my paperwork, how my name is signed, that's not my handwriting. Back in 2016, Credit Acceptance went through XXXX of lawsuit loans. Meaning their loans were bad. Credit Acceptance didn't tell the truth to the investors when loans were given out.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-12-22
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: PA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
i have submitted multiple investigation requests to verify and validate this debt with XXXX XXXX as well as all 3 credit bureaus and they say they completed and investigation and it is verified ... .how can they have conducted a full investigation if they are reporting inconsistent across all 3 bureaus? they didnt and that is a major violation of my rights..they are ruining my credit with the reporting of this inaccurate account,,, ,i am attaching a snip of my 3 bureau report ... ..there are too many to point out but look at thhe snip ... look at the 2 year history, this account has been re-aged, they are reporting a credit limit on a charged off account, the high credit is inconsistent, etc .... i need this removed immediately due to the lack of a proper investigation with all 4 parties i disputed to

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-22
Company: AES/PHEAA
State: FL
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Dealing with your lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Received bad information about your loan

Complaint:
I not only should qualify for borrower defense to repayment, I should also qualify for public service loan forgiveness and I am just getting the runaround on both of these issues from XXXX. My loans were put into forbearance while my borrower defense application was being considered, I did not ask for my loans to be put in forbearance they chose to do that, but all of a sudden now I see I have a payment due in XXXX. I put in my application for public service loan forgiveness recently, for the second time, and they are saying they never received my first application which I did in 2016. I provided all of the documentation to show that I worked for XXXX   XXXX for the past 11 years and they are saying that I only qualify for four payments. All of this is a giant mess and it is so negatively affecting my life to the point that I really may become homeless because I have to pay such high rent because I can't qualify for any kind of mortgage because of my student loans which should be forgiven either through borrower defense or through public service loan forgiveness. I can not get a straight answer from anyone on any of this. I am a XXXX XXXX I am making no money and I'm doing the best I can I really need help!!

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-07
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: NY
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Struggling to repay your loan
Sub-issue: Problem lowering your monthly payments

Complaint:
My XXXX career was exclusively funded by student loans. I was never counseled with regards to the number of loans I was taking, career choices, and possible earning potential. When I graduated, I deferred those loans until I got settled into a job and decided what my next steps were. I eventually decided to pursue a XXXX XXXX Degree in XXXX. On top of having to take some additional XXXX coursework, my XXXXXXXX XXXX was also funded by loans. I eventually got a XXXX job in an urban district where I thought, after 5 years, I would have {$17.00} of my {$130000.00} loan balance forgiven. Well- I was wrong. I had consolidated some of my loans, and that. in conjunction with the dates, some of my loans had been taken out, made me ineligible for student loan forgiveness. To add insult to injury, I have since been laid off from XXXX, and found other work, but have been deferring my loans. My husband makes a decent living but will no contribute towards my student loans. Yet his income disqualifies me for the option of an income-based repayment plan and my minimum payment works out to be over {$900.00} per month, which with XXXX kids, and numerous expenses I can't afford. At this rate, the interest accrues, I continue to defer and have no idea how I will ever get out from under all of this debt and start saving for my own kids future.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-02
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
This consumer reporting agency as defined by law has violated my rights under the FCRA for not assuring me 100 % possible maximum accuracy. Every automated complaint that comes back says items are verified when they have not done a reasonable investigation of the items in question Pursuant to 15 U.S. Code 1681e - Compliance procedures section ( b ) says whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares a consumer report it follows reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information concerning the individual about whom the report relates. To my understanding, the only investigation that credit reporting agencies do is a simple communication with the XXXX XXXX system to request verification. Verification could be as simple as a phone number address and name all of which are public information and is not the maximum possible accuracy which would mean that you are in violation of the FCRA. 
These are the Inaccurate tradelines that I disputed that have not been removed or investigated properly. 


XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2021-09-07
Company: Keynote Consulting, Inc.
State: IL
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Medical debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt is not yours

Complaint:
My ward received services at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, and XX/XX/XXXX. I first started receiving bills in XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, by a company called XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX who claimed they were the billing company for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. These bills were paid. On XX/XX/XXXX, several months after services had ended, and in the middle of a global pandemic I received an emailed bill. I noticed immediately that the bill was incorrect, payments had been applied wrong. I spent over an hour on the phone with a Ms. XXXX XXXX who claimed that the issue was with how insurance was applied and that the issue was going to be resolved. She stated that things would be slow due to everyone working from home and not having accurate access to records during the pandemic, and shut down. To confirm this Ms. XXXX XXXX sent me an email on XX/XX/XXXX, four days after our conversation, with an updated invoice and the invoice showed balance of XXXX. I have both the email and the invoice. There were no further communications, and since the issue was resolved and the balance showed XXXX, I assumed all was well. I received no further communications. Around XX/XX/XXXX, almost a year later I received a phone call from a collection agency ( Keynote Consulting Agency XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Illinois ). The collection agency claimed that they had been contracted by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  to collect a debt. I told the debt collector that I was disputing the debt, and that I was requesting debt verification, including a copy of the last bill sent to me by the original creditor, and I further asked that proof be provided that Keynote Consulting had been contracted to even collect the debt. I further put this in writing and mailed to the address on file for the debt collector. I heard nothing back from Keynote, additionally to this day nothing has been provided that even proves that Keynote has been contracted by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to collect any debt as part of services rendered, even though this information has been requested. On XX/XX/XXXX, I noticed that Keynote Consulting Agency, after failing to provide debt verification, as required, they reported this collection activity to the three primary credit bureaus ( XXXX XXXX XXXX  ). Attempts to resolve these issues from both the original creditor and debt collection agency has failed. Not only are both parties violating the Fair Debt Collection act, XXXX XXXX is also refusing to even provide basic contact information about their agency or even proof that they have been contracted to collect a debt from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, which again is a debt that is false. 
Please note the very last invoice shows a balance of XXXX. There were no further invoices after XX/XX/XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation