BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2022-03-01
Company: Comerica
State: MI
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account
Sub-issue: Money was taken from your account on the wrong day or for the wrong amount

Complaint:
comerica bank XXXX XXXX direct express card services is adding fraud alerts to freeze customers accounts to gain money in bank intrest i am now one of those victims this is XXXX XXXX crimes ab=nd the abuse of XXXX people

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2021-08-17
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: CA
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Closing your account
Sub-issue: Company closed your account

Complaint:
I was opened a XXXX  credit card with Citibank, and they closed my account today due to returned payment as I didnt missing any payment, my next due day is not coming yet.also they was never created those payments on my account but when the payment was returned, they add those amounts to my balance.All of that with no notice to me, also I didnt have access to the account a week ago due to some security reasons, at that time they was told me, thats only option for access to the account is sending me a letter, its takes 7-10 business days to arrive my address, so I never received that letter as today.now they said the account can not reopen.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2021-06-13
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: MS
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Investigation took more than 30 days

Complaint:
I received notice through my credit monitoring app that I had a number of collections posted to my credit reports. These accounts are not mine. At or around XX/XX/2021 I submitted letters to XXXX, XXXX  and TransUnion requesting verification of these collections/ charge-offs and to see proof that these accounts were mine since I am the only one who can truly verify this debt. I did not give them permission to share this information. It has been over 30 days and have not received an updated report, nor any documents with signature from the companies in question, even the bureaus. They are in violation of FCRA 623 ( b ) ( 2 ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) as well as 15 United States Code 1681i for no response within a reasonable time limit. Accounts in question : XXXX {$2100.00} XXXX XXXX {$660.00} XXXX {$0.00} XXXX  {$14000.00} I am acting on my own behalf. I do not authorize anyone or third party to act or verify who isn't me.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-07-05
Company: TRINITY HOPE ASSOCIATES
State: NC
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Medical debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt is not yours

Complaint:
This company, which I hold no contract with nor have received services from, reported a collection account against my SSN in the amount of {$2200.00} with XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX credit reporting agencies. I requested verification/validation of the debt and account however the business failed to provide adequate proof. Considering that the business does not have a contract with me for goods or services they have provided nor have they provided adequate proof that I am obligated to pay for the alleged debt.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-27
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: CA
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Problem caused by your funds being low
Sub-issue: Overdrafts and overdraft fees

Complaint:
US Bank has be reordering my transaction in order to accrue more overdraft fees on multiple dates. After raising the issue with them, they stated it was because of the clearing date but the transactions are not even chronological order. I have attached photos of the dates of the transactions and screenshots my bank account showing the order doesnt match. I will include their proper order below. In addition, another occurrence an incorrect overdraft put a hold on my account putting it negative resulting in multiple overdraft fees. The original fee was refunded but the hold putting my account negative remained. 

In the first case on XX/XX/XXXX, they reordered transaction including a loan deposit ( not a wire, the loan company said it is a direct deposit and takes 24-48hrs tops ) in order to obtain fees. On XX/XX/XXXX I was charged an overdraft fee that was refunded and put a hold on my account making it appear negative when it wasn't. The correct order of the transaction is XXXX XXXX  was made XX/XX/XXXX ( attached ) and the XXXX XXXX loan was issued the XX/XX/XXXX and should have cleared XX/XX/XXXX resulting in a positive balance. In addition the order of the transactions is XXXX XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX XXXX, then XXXX XXXX ( in less than 24 hrs from the XXXX XXXX which would not result in a overdrsft. But the loan was not accepted until XX/XX/XXXX at which another automatic payment came out on XX/XX/XXXX resulting in a third overdraft fee. I've attached all bills and the loan deposit receipt showing the payment date which matches the deposit date. It also shows that the loan owner says it should be 1-2 days tops. I called the loan company and they said it was cleared on their side and showed deposited. The bank however held it. In addition, to saying my account was negative for " hold '' for a overdraft fee that was refunded. 

The second occurrence was the weekend of XX/XX/XXXX. The transactions correct order is XX/XX/XXXX XXXX, after-party XX/XX/XXXX and then XXXX  XX/XX/XXXX. I have attached the bills to verify this. The transactions were reordered in order to charge fees and a " hold '' was put on funds for transactions that occurred before the payment even ordered. I was also told my an additional {$36.00} fee or more depending on the interpretation of the account. You can see from rhe screenshots they've notated tons of transactions that the account was negative because a transaction that occurred after the transactions being called negative. I've attached everything I can to prove these. This is the just most recent incidence of transaction reordering to obtain more overdraft fees from me as a long time customer and state employee.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-20
Company: U.S. BANCORP
State: MO
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Fees or interest
Sub-issue: Unexpected increase in interest rate

Complaint:
I own a small business and, our business has been using US Bank Credit Card for over 10 years. Our company has always paid the full balance or the minimum balance required by the credit card terms and conditions. However, our business took a downturn in XX/XX/2016 with unexpected drop revenue and change in the market place. 

We haven't been able to recover thus we have not been able to make the full payments to the credit card. 

Since XX/XX/2016 the US Bank Credit Card started to increase our interest rates from 13 % to 24 % APR. and 29 % APR thus costing us a lot more to make the minimum payment and sequentially our ability to eliminate the debt. Furthermore, they allowed our credit card to go over the {$6000.00} credit limit causing our account to incur additional fees per cycle. 

I spoke with the credit card stating we didn't want our credit to be expanded if we didn't have any additional credit and also to return the {$39.00} fees assessed to our account and Indeed they did. however, they continue to add the fee each and every cycle. 

First, we have paid our credit card for the last 13 years. We should not be penalized our interest rate increased 10 points on the Apr. It's simply unfair and predatory. 

Second, if the credit granted we should not be charged the recurring {$39.00} over the limit fee. In both instances, it not because we are not paying our bill on time it is simply trapped to charge our account additional fees. 

I would like a comparable credit to our account our ability to fairly negotiate the debt so we can move our business forward. 

sincerely XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-27
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In accordance with the Fair Reporting act. The account listed below has violated my federally protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality under 15 USC 1681. 
XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX. No account number given. On XX/XX/2021 has violated my rights. 
15 U. S. C. 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U. S. C. 1681 Section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not without my written instructions.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-02-02
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account information incorrect

Complaint:
To Whom It May Concern, This letter is a formal complaint that the following companies ( XXXX, Transunion, XXXX ) are reporting inaccurate and incomplete credit information. 

I am distressed that the aforementioned entities have included the information below in my credit profile and that they have failed to maintain reasonable procedures in their operations to assure maximum possible accuracy in the credit reports they've published. Credit reporting laws ensure that bureaus report only 100 % accurate credit information. Every step must be taken to assure the information reported is completely accurate and correct. The following information therefore needs to be re-investigated and deleted from my credit profile. 

FPDCPA Section 807 Violation Misleading False Reporting PARAMOUNTRMG Account Number : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-27
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
'In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Everything has to be 100 % accurate on my credit report.

The Credit bureaus stated my account was properly investigation but how is that possible if the open date is inaccurate, the date last active is inaccurate, and date last reported is not accurate. This ground for removal they also violated my rights under 15 U.S.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S. C 1681 Section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions Also the Credit bureaus took more than 30 days to complete my investigation here is my certified mail tracking #

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-09-29
Company: Ditech Financial LLC
State: UT
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Trouble during payment process

Complaint:
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX I mailed in a check for payment of {$1400.00} for my mortgage. The check cleared as expected, and I thought all was good. It was not until the next month, that I noticed my payment balance was twice what it normally was. I thought nothing of it, and proceeded to pay my bill as usual, because any inquiries at such institutions fall on deaf ears. It was n't until XXXX, XXXX that I reached out to DiTech to ask why the payment amount was twice what it normally was, as a missed payment showed up on my credit report ( I have flawless credit, nearing XXXX XXXX. They proceeded to tell me that the payment for the month of XXXX was not received. Ok, how can this be? I ask the lady to investigate further ( she was awesome XXXX XXXX, and discovered the XXXX check was applied to only escrow ... .the entire {$1400.00}. This was done on behalf of DiTech, under NO circumstance did I direct them to do so. Is this a normal practice? No. Whoever received my XXXX payment in the mail applied the payment incorrectly, and not in accordance with procedure. 

I swiftly asked that the payment be corrected ( it was XXXX, and that the missed payment be taken off my credit report i.e., that DiTech draft and send a letter to the credit reporting agencies that this was a MISTAKE ON THEIR BEHALF, and that I ( the consumer ) did in fact not make a late payment. I was told this was completed in late XXXX, XXXX. However, upon recently getting another credit pull on XXXX XXXX, XXXX - I was reluctant to see that the late payment from DiTech was still on my Credit Report. Shame on them. I reached out to DiTech again on XXXX XXXX, XXXX to inquire about the error on their end, and have yet to hear from them XXXX as I mentioned earlier, these requests often fall all deaf ears XXXX. Please inquire about the credit report issues, and the complaint handling at DiTech. In accordance with the Title X of the Dodd-Frank XXXX XXXX Reform and Consumer Protection Act of XXXX XXXX the XXXX XXXX XXXX established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( CFPB ) and authorizes it to supervise certain consumer financial services companies and large depository institutions and their affiliates for consumer protection purposes. I, as a consumer, do believe that the internal policies and procedures at DiTech are not adequate to appropriately address issues or concerns with the FCRA, XXXX XXXX, and TIL acts. Please investigate my issue, and use this complaint to pursue any harmful acts at DiTech.

Company public response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-09-29
Company: Fay Servicing, LLC
State: CA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage

Complaint:
WE, COMPLETED AN IN-HOUSE TRIAL PERIOD PLAN FOR 6 MONTHS OF {$4900.00} PER MONTH, TOTAL POSTED CHECKS BY FAY {$29000.00} WHICH FAY HAS NOT CURRENTLY APPLIED PAYMENTS TO OUR CURRENT MORTGAGE, FAY HAS ADDED {$100000.00} EXCESSIVE FEES TO THE MORTGAGE PRINCIPAL WHILE I WAS STILL IN BANKRUPTCY IN XXXX. 

FAY OFFERED ON XXXX/XXXX/XXXX AN PERMANET LOAN MODIFICATION OF {$5000.00} FOR A SHORT TERM 20 YEAR FIX WITH AN BALLOON PAYMENT OF {$16000.00} TO BE PAID IN FULL XXXX ON MATURE DATE. 

THIS MODIFICATION IS NOT AN AFFORDABLE MONTHLY PAYMENT FOR 20 YEARS, THIS MODIFICATION WILL FORCE ME A DEFAULT ON LOAN FOR MY HOME TO BE FORECLOSED FOR AN TRUSTEE SALE. 

FAY SERVICING ; STRATIGIES ARE TO DENIE MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS TO GENERATE, EXCESSIVE DOLLARS TO YOUR LOAN, TO MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO SAVE YOUR HOME. 

I, BELIEVE ; FAY SERVICING IS IN VIOLATIONS OF " MORTGAGE FRAUD ''

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-27
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In Accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The list of accounts below has violated my federally protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality under 15 USC 1681. 

XXXX  Account # XXXX has violated my rights. 

XXXX Account # XXXX has violated my rights. 

15 U.S.C 1618 Section 602A states I have the right to privacy. 15 U.S.C Section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions.

15 U.S.C 1618c. ( a ) ( 5 ) Section states : no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antecedents the report by more than seven years.

15 U.S.C 1618 s-2 ( A ) ( 1 ) A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-20
Company: AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
State: OR
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Credit card debt
Issue: Communication tactics
Sub-issue: You told them to stop contacting you, but they keep trying

Complaint:
American Express is repeatedly calling me for a debt owed by someone else. Over past 4 or 5 yrs they call my number asking for someone by the name of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( spelling phonetically ) is the debtor I keep asking them to stop calling they repeatedly tell me they are removing my number and they say they will but I just received a call from them 2 days ago. I am tired of being harassed for a debt that is not mine, nor do I have any information about this person.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2017-11-16
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: NC
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Old information reappears or never goes away

Complaint:
The loans being reported are past the statutes of limitations. They are between XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX and should no longer be reported on my credit report.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-27
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In Accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The list of accounts below has violated my federally protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality under 15 USC 1681. 

XXXX Account # XXXX has violated my rights. 

XXXX Account # XXXX has violated my rights. 

15 U.S.C 1618 Section 602A states I have the right to privacy. 15 U.S.C Section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions.

15 U.S.C 1618c. ( a ) ( 5 ) Section states : no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antecedents the report by more than seven years.

15 U.S.C 1618 s-2 ( A ) ( 1 ) A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-20
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NM
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Received unsolicited financial product or insurance offers after opting out

Complaint:
Experian has been authorizing 'Soft Inquiries ' on my account to sell my information to 3rd party lending companies despite being registered on the do-not-contact/opt-out permanent listing for the last two years. This is in direct violation of the FCRA. Experian offers no mechanism through their web site to dispute these 'Soft Inquiries ' and confirm your status on the permanent opt-out listing ( already confirmed with the two other credit reporting agencies ). However, Experian 's violation was confirmed through their online dispute process by showing the vast number of these 'Soft Inquiries ' that were actioned against my credit report.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-04-27
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: MS
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Public record information inaccurate

Complaint:
To whom it concerns, In accordance to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, my right to fair consumer reporting is being violated. A chapter XXXX Bankruptcy is being reported on my Equifax and XXXX credit report. All information is not accurate and should thus be removed. According to 15 U.S.C. 1681 its states that I have a right to privacy as well as a right to dispute inaccurate information on my credit report. I have tried to correct this with the bureaus who state they did an investigation and verified this account. However, the report from these two bureaus are still reporting inaccurate information and is causing damage to my credit score. 

I request that this erroneous information reported by Equifax and XXXX be removed from my report immediately.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation