Consumer complaint received 2021-02-09
Company: Diaz Anselmo Lindberg, P.A.
State: IL
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Mortgage debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Sub-issue: Seized or attempted to seize your property

Complaint:
On XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX etc. deceived me into believing that a Foreclosure Complaint had been filed in the XXXX County Circuit Court. 

By law A complaint must be filed with the Clerk of the Court not with a judge. If you look at the majority of these alleged foreclosure complaints, you will see that they were never filed because they contain a judges file stamp and not the clerks file stamp. Again, they have to engage in these criminal simulated filings because the banks never had standing to sue. The majority of laws firms are employees of XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX illegally owns numerous of properties that were illegally foreclosed in the state of Illinois and several other states. 
How Service of Summons is made It is common knowledge that in XXXX County the sheriff must be used to make the first attempt at service of a summons. If the XXXX County Sheriff is unable to serve the Defendants, then the Plaintiff or the Plaintiffs attorney may first file a Notice of Motion to Appoint A Special Process Server. This form is used to schedule the court date when you will see the judge. This is called the hearing date. This form also : Lists the date, time and place where you will see the judge ; Lists the names and addresses of the other parties or the names and addresses of their lawyers ; and tells the other parties in the case about the court date. The Notice is filed with a Motion to Appoint A Special Process Server This form is used to ask for permission from a judge to use a special process server. A licensed private detective or anyone who is XXXX years old or over and NOT a party to the case can be used. If a judge grants the request at the time of the hearing, he or she will issue a signed Order entitled Order Appointing A Special Process Server. 

A reasonable person would infer that the banks do not want to use the sheriff to serve the alleged Defendant ( s ) because they are fully aware that the summons is not valid. If the summons were valid the Defendant ( s ) would be responsible for paying for the cost and the county of XXXX would benefit financially. Hence, it would benefit the county if the sheriff was used. 

Therefore, it does not take a rocket scientist to know why the banks simulate the use of process servings companies and detective agencies that are owned by XXXX XXXX. When you look at any alleged order appointing a special process server you will notice that they are not signed by a judge. This is yet another of the vast reasons why the alleged defendant ( s ) were never served and the case was void from its inception. 

The alleged Order Appointing A Special Process Server is never signed by a judge. It contains the PRINTED STAMP name of judge XXXX XXXX. It does not contain the file stamp of the Clerk of the Court. Chief Judge XXXX XXXX XXXX and the rest of his criminal enterprise are fully aware that XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Pro-vest and all the service of process companies owned by Chief Judge XXXX XXXX XXXX can not legally serve an invalid summons, can not collect fees, because he runs a criminal enterprise. 

Further, most if not all of the attorneys that file these illegal foreclosures are employees or affiliates of XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX has numerous contracts with, the banks, XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX state and federal governments. This means that even if these lawsuits were legal to begin with and they are NOT. The more than 250 law firms that are either employees or affiliates of his could not/ can not be used to file these illegal foreclosures. Most if not all of the foreclosures that have been conducted for decades in the state of Illinois and numerous other states were void without legal effect. 

It is significant to note, XXXX XXXX XXXX owns the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. A newspaper that caters to attorneys. When his employees fail to serve an illegal summons, they place an ad for publication in said newspaper. The cost for this placement is over {$650.00}. This illegal fee is also added to the alleged defendant mortgage. 

Like the rule of the federal court. The Illinois Supreme Court also has a rule stating that an attorney must filed a written Appearance or other pleading before addressing the court. A Motion is not a Pleading. 

Rule 13. AppearancesTime to PleadWithdrawal Addressing the Court.An attorney shall file a written appearance or other pleading before addressing the court unlessthe attorney is presenting a motion for leave to appear by intervention or otherwise Note some of the following relates to this complaint and it taken from the documents that I filed in the courts. Therefore, some paragraphs contain the words Plaintiff and Defendant In order for process of service to be valid and enforceable there must be a case that was legally filed. Let me trick you into believing that a case was legally filed does not count. In the rare instance when a case is legally filed by an attorney it must strictly conform to the statutory and court rules : It must contain the seal of the court ; it must be signed by the clerk, it must be requested ; it must be dated and time stamped on the date and time that it is issued. 

A judges file stamp consists of a square box, The CH stands for the Chancery  The number after the CH is the Judges Room number. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 104 ( b ) requires documents to be filed with the Clerk and not a judge. Further, a lawsuit must be filed in the proper department, for example a foreclosure must be filed in the Chancery Department, a civil suit in the Civil Department a Criminal Suit in the Criminal Department. When not stamped with a judges file stamp some civil law lawsuits will have a Chancery stamp on them. 

The Criminal Tactics Used To Illegally Foreclose Homes In The State Of Illinois As in all courts throughout the world a judgement becomes final only after it is singed and filed. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 272. When Judgment is Entered states as follows : If at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by the judge or if a circuit court rule requires the prevailing party to submit a draft order, the clerk shall make a notation to that effect and the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed. If no such signed written judgment is to be filed, the judge or clerk shall forthwith make a notation of judgment and enter the judgment of record promptly, and the judgment is entered at the time it is entered of record Amended XX/XX/XXXX, effective XX/XX/XXXX ; amended XXXX XXXX, XXXX, eff. XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 
Committee Comments. The purpose of this rule is to remove any doubt as to the date a judgment is entered. It applies to both law and equity ... In 1990 the rule was amended to provide that in those cases in which, by circuit court rule, the prevailing party is required to submit a draft order, a judgment becomes final only after the signed judgment is filed. 

Per the Clerks of Courts Act ( 705 ILCS 105/8 ) ( from Ch. 25, par. 8 ) Sec. 8 : Documents issued by the clerk are required to be signed and bear the seal of the Court. The law states in part as follows : The clerks shall, in all cases, attend in person to the duties of their offices, respectively, when it is practicable so to do, and shall perform all the duties thereof which can reasonably be performed by one person. In the performance of the duties of the office of clerk of the circuit court, any such clerk, after filing with the Secretary of State his or her manual signature certified by him or her under oath, may execute or cause to be executed with a facsimile signature, in lieu of his or her original signature, all forms of process and notices issued by his or her office. " Facsimile signature '' means a reproduction by engraving, imprinting, stamping, or other means of the manual signature of an authorized officer. When the seal of the clerk of the circuit court is required in the execution of any process or notice issued by the clerk 's office, the clerk may cause the seal to be printed, engraved, stamped or otherwise placed in facsimile thereon. The facsimile seal has the same effect as the impression of the seal. ( Source : XXXX. XXXX. ) The XXXX County GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. XXXX ELECTRONIC FILING ( eFILING ) OF COURT DOCUMENTS states as follows : Electronic Signatures a. Any document electronically signed pursuant to this section shall comply with all applicable laws and rules regarding original signatures on court documents and shall be subject to applicable sanctions. i. Each electronically filed document shall bear a facsimile or typographical signature of the attorney or pro se party authorizing such filing. ii. Documents containing signatures of third parties may be filed electronically and shall bear a facsimile or typographical signature. 

APPLICABLE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES If a document was/is not signed by an attorney, the judge was/is required to dismiss the case see the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11. 

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers ; Representations to the Court ; Sanctions ( a ) SIGNATURE. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorneys nameor by a party personally if the party is unrepresentedThe court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorneys or partys attention. 

The Plaintiff in a case is required to serve the defendant within 90 days if the Plaintiff fails to do the case must be dismissed by the judge. See the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 ( m ) : TIME LIMIT FOR SERVICE. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the courton motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiffmust dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant ... 

SOME MAJOR LAWS AND RULES THAT EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW Simulation of legal process is generally defined by most governments as follows : A person is guilty of a misdemeanor who, with a purpose to procure the compliance of another with a request made by such person, knowingly sends, mails or delivers to such person a notice or other writing which has no judicial or other sanction, but which in its format or appearance simulates a summons, complaint, court order or process, including, but not limited to, lien, indictment, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading, subpoena, or order, or an insignia, seal or printed form of a federal, state or local government or an instrumentality thereof, or is otherwise calculated to induce a belief that it does have a judicial or other official sanction. 
N.H. Rev. Stat. 638:14 APPLICABLE COURT RULES AND DEFINITIONS THAT YOU MUST KNOW OFFICER OF THE COURT : Any person who has an obligation to promote justice and uphold the law, including judges, clerks, court personnel, police officers and attorneys ( who must be truthful in court and obey court rules ). 

TITLE 28JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE 1691. SEAL AND TESTE OF PROCESS : All writs and process issuing from a court of the United States shall be under the seal of the court and signed by the clerk thereof. ( XX/XX/XXXX, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945. ) 18 U.S. CODE 505. SEALS OF COURTS ; SIGNATURES OF JUDGES OR COURT OFFICERS Whoever forges the signature of any judge, register, or other officer of any court of the United States, or of any Territory thereof, or forges or counterfeits the seal of any such court, or knowingly concurs in using any such forged or counterfeit signature or seal, for the purpose of authenticating any proceeding or document, or tenders in evidence any such proceeding or document with a false or counterfeit signature of any such judge, register, or other officer, or a false or counterfeit seal of the court, subscribed or attached thereto, knowing such signature or seal to be false or counterfeit, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. ( XX/XX/XXXX, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 714 ; Pub. L. 103322, title XXXIII, 330016 ( 1 ) ( K ), XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX Stat. 2147. ) The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts ( AO ) created a form entitled AO 458 Appearance of Counsel. This form has been approved for use for all Federal District Courts in the United States. The form states as follows : APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL To : The clerk of court and all parties of record I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for, ______________________________. 

The blank line on this form that is used for the attorneys signature does not contain a preprinted s/ or S/. 

Most non-attorneys : ( i ) believe that s/ is a proper electronic signature ( ii ) are not aware that the S/ is preprinted on said forms ( iii ) that the ILND Attorney Appearance Forms are proper and the same as or similar to the official Appearance of Counsel AO 458 form. 

When an attorney types his or her name after the preprinted S/ on the form. The attorney is fully aware that the preprinted /S is already there because they did not physically type the /S on the form with their own hand. In fact, they just placed their name after the preprinted /S. 

Further the attorney is fully aware that because of the foregoing and following. The client that the attorney stated was allegedly represented by them was in fact never represented at all. 

A preprinted S should not be in front of the signature line S_______________. The signature line should be blank line ______________________. 

The sole purpose of the preprinted S/ is to deceive the non-attorney into believing that the form was signed with an electronic signature. 

Again, the attorney appearance form was never signed because a name NOT an electronic signature or wet/ holographic signature /s/XXXX XXXX was placed after the preprinted /S. 

When a person clicks on the text box and enters his or her name into it. The name comes in close contact with the S/. Again, because a majority of Pro-se Litigants believe that S/ is a valid attorney signature and for the reasons already stated Pro se litigants are easily deceived. 

In addition, an Appearance of Counsel/Attorney Appearance must be made prior to or simultaneously with the filing of any document. Let me stress this mandated rule again. An attorney MUST file an Appearance of Counsel along with a Certificate of Service before they can file any documents in court. If they did not it means any document that was filed by an attorney who did not follow the above rules is void without legal effect.

A proper and valid Appearance of Counsel form is paramount because if the attorney fails to file one ( i ) their client is not represented in court, ( ii ) they lose the case by default. In addition, it is obvious that if an attorney does not file an appearance monetary damages can not be legally awarded to that attorney or the party that said attorney states that they are representing. 

The ILND Local Rule 83.12. Appearance of Attorneys Generally states in part as follows : Who May Appear. Except as provided in LR14 and LR83.15 and as otherwise provided in this rule, only members in good standing of the general bar of this [ meaning the ILND court ] Court may enter an appearance on behalf of a party ; file pleadings, motions or other documents ; sign stipulations ; or receive payments upon judgments, decrees or orders. [ The judges of the XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX frequently award attorney fees and monetary awards to lawyers and their corporate friends even though no judgments, decrees or orders have been rendered ] Attorneys admitted to the trial bar may appear alone in all matters. Attorneys admitted to the general bar, but not to the trial bar, may appear in association with a member of the trial bar in all matters and may appear alone except as otherwise provided by this rule.

Even if the attorneys had filed an appearance of Counsel or another valid document along with a Certificate of Service which they did NOT. ( i ) Most of the attorneys re not members of the trial bar, meaning that they could not appear alone in court ( could not be lead counsel ) .See EXHIBIT 3 unsigned Appearance of Counsel forms XXXX  Local Rule 83.12 ( d ) states : ( d ) Waiver. A judge may permit an attorney admitted to the general bar, but not the trial bar, to appear alone in any aspect of a civil or criminal proceeding only upon written request by the client and a showing that the interests of justice are best served by a waiver of these rules. Such permission shall apply only to the proceeding in which it was granted and shall be limited to exceptional circumstances. 

After the attorney has made a significant amount of money which is several months or years down the line. ( Most of their billion-dollar profits come from simulated cases. ) The attorney will file a simulated Motion to Withdraw. The problem is that an attorney can not withdraw from a case in which they were never the attorney. Even if a valid Appearance had been filed and they were NOT. There are a host of local and federal laws that must be followed before an attorney can withdraw from a case. 

The requirements for signing a document are will be filed electronically are set out in Section IX ( A ) of the General Order on Electronic Case Filing it provides as follows : Electronically filed documents must include a signature block and must set forth the name, address, telephone number and the attorney 's bar registration number, if applicable. In addition, the name of the efiler under whose login and password the document is submitted must be preceded by an /s/ and typed in the space where the signature would otherwise appear. Page 3 of the above also states what a proper electronic signature should look like as shown below : Incorrect or no electronic signature The attorney logged into CM/ECF must be the same attorney whose name appears on the signature line. The electronic signature, typed at the signature line of the document, consists of the characters /s/ and the attorneys name typed out. For example, XXXX XXXX is a properly formatted electronic signature. 

The Entry of a Judgment vs. Rendition of a Judgment According to XXXX 's XXXX  XXXX  XXXX XXXX, the Entry of Judgment is defined as follows : Formally recording the result of a lawsuit that is based upon the determination by the court of the facts and applicable law, makes the result effective for purposes of bringing an action to enforce it or to commence an appeal. 

The entry of a judgment is not the same as the rendition of a judgment. Rendition is a judicial act by a court in pronouncing the sentence of law based upon the facts in controversy. Entry occurs after the rendition of judgment and is a ministerial act that consists of recording the ultimate conclusion reached by the court in the action and providing concrete evidence of the judicially imposed consequences. It serves as a memorial of the action. 

For a final judgment to exist there must be an order that is signed by a Judge and the Entry of a Judgment that is dated and signed by the clerk and or deputy clerk of the court. Like other documents issued by the clerk of the court, such as a summons and a subpoena it should also have the seal of the court. 

While it is true, the clerk of the District Court is authorized to spread upon the court docket the proceedings had and relief granted by the court and to that extent is responsible for entry of the judgment, such clerk has no authority to perform the judicial function of rendering a judgment. 

An " order '' entered on the trial docket does not constitute a rendition of judgment. Any action maintaining to be a judgment, decree, or final order must be rendered, signed and entered to be valid. 

Further, XXXX XXXX XXXX is the Chief Justice of the Illinois Court of Claims. The Illinois Constitution Art. 6, 13 ( b ) and Federal law prohibits a judge from holding a position ( s ) of profit yet, XXXX XXXX XXXX holds numerous positions of profit which he greatly benefits from. 

Chief Judge XXXX XXXX XXXX works for the Illinois Secretary of state office. He has access to anyones personal information. Most if not all law firms, banks and other corporations uses his service of process companies and detective agencies listed under various names throughout the U.S. to trick unknowing litigants into believing that they have been served with a valid summons. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX owns most if not all of the process serving companies in Illinois and throughout the United States. His Process Servers know that they can not serve invalid summonses, such as those that are not signed and do not bear the seal of the court. 
Nonetheless his Process Servers brings them to individuals and corporations throughout the united states. This is because XXXX XXXX XXXX through his numerous subsidiaries has a monopoly on attorneys, real estate transactions, foreclosure auctions, etc. 

The Illinois Constitution Article 6, 13 ( b ) as does federal criminal and civil laws prohibits a judge from holding a position ( s ) of profit yet, XXXX XXXX holds numerous positions of profit which he greatly benefits from. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. ( XXXX  ) and its Affiliations ( The Exhibits listed in this section are from [ R. 255 ] and are incorporated herein by reference ) As stated previously Defendant XXXX is President and CEO of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX  ). 

XXXX XXXX XXXX has numerous subsidiaries/affiliates : I will list a few : Some of these are disclosed such as XXXX XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Others are hidden such as : XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( XXXX ) XXXX XXXX is President and CEO of the XXXX. XXXX XXXX is XXXX XXXX ), XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( This organization is used by some attorneys to befriend the elderly so that they can be tricked into getting a reverse mortgage. President XXXX signed reverse mortgages into law. The elderly often loses their homes after getting one. ) XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX loves to use patriotic words in their company names ) XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX what do these tittles remind you of ) XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( According to XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX is the largest provider of services and technology focused exclusively on the e-Filing and eService needs of LAW FIRMS and COURTS in the United States ), XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, The XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX  XXXX  XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, IL. See the pin and deed as follows for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, IL : He often keeps properties that he illegally auctions off for himself or keeps them in a trust for his fellow criminal co-conspirators. 
XXXX XXXX, and the Defendant Banks and other non-defendants use XXXX as its sole property inspector and the XXXX XXXX for the auctioning off of foreclosure properties. 
XXXX has XXXX attorney agents some of which are as follows : XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX who was/is employed by XXXX XXXX XXXX. They are agents for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as [ EXHIBIT 5 ]. 

Mr. XXXX as an attorney had/had a duty not to withhold this information from the court. He is also paid by the Illinois state government and XXXX County through taxpayer dollars. He is Defendants XXXX simulated attorney as he never filed an Appearance of Council. His simulated Motion to Withdraw as her attorney XXXX is also void. See [ R. 214 ]. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX ; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX Agents of : XXXX XXXX  ) ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as [ EXHIBIT 6 ] XXXX and XXXX, Agents of : XXXX, XXXX as [ EXHIBIT 7 ] XXXX XXXX XXXX, Agents of : XXXX, CT, XXXX as [ EXHIBIT 8 ] XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX of : XXXX, XXXX as [ EXHIBIT 9 ] XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Agents of : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX as [ EXHIBIT 10 ] XXXX XXXX - President of XXXX XXXX, and an Agent of ATG as [ EXHIBIT 11 ] ATG and Defendant XXXX are one in the same ; therefore, when ATG makes a monetary contribution to political candidates who help pass laws that benefit his entities financially, it is in clear violation of the law. 

His multi roles along with other judges and officers of the court corrupts and influences the judicial machinery in such a way that the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted. 

On XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX made the tax paying residents of the state of Illinois believed that Senate Bill 0065 could legally be passed. He did this by mimicking the filing of a Complaint in the Chancery Department in the XXXX County Circuit Court. This document was not legally filed. It was submitted manually and not electronically. As explained below he owns XXXX & XXXX the largest provider of efiling services for the courts. See XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX v. The Illinois department of Professional Regulation, et al. XXXX. It is my belief XXXX XXXX XXXX, the Vice President and General Counsel of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX filled out and signed documents involving the Federal Election Commission and Voting Rights. Compare his signature to some of these cases. They care noting about people of color. They only use them as puppets to benefit their agenda. 

If you learn some of the basic court rules you will know that ATG/XXXX  could not legally file the above complaint, therefore he made the taxpayers think it was legally filed. XXXX XXXX XXXX and other Politicians should have thrown out XXXX and all his other bills that put millions if not billions in his pocket. Instead guess what NO ONE said anything. The XXXX was voted on. The void Bill Passed in favor or ATG/XXXX XXXX XXXX. Illinois Senator XXXX XXXX XXXX and Illinois House Representative XXXX XXXX XXXX sponsored senate Bill SB0065. On information and belief XXXX XXXX XXXX has bribed most Republican and Democratic politicians and judges. They work for the benefit of his monopolies not for the benefit of the citizens that they are suppose to represent. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX created a monopoly of companies, bribed public officials, schools, churches, etc. which allowed him and his co-conspirators to keep stealing from taxpayers. This includes but is not limited to : charging enormous fees for closing costs, title insurance, sending his process servers to homes and businesses to serve fraudulent summonses, employing attorneys and law enforcement officials who engage in criminal activities, auctioning off properties that he knows can not be auctioned off. Remember no one owns a property outright unlit the mortgage is paid off or if you are lucky enough to pay if off. XXXX XXXX XXXX may be the most prolific, abysmal, greedy etc. alleged human that ever lived. 

It should be noted, XXXX XXXX a state senator at the time voted for it and for or against other bills that put money in XXXX pocket. Guess what he went to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX the same law school XXXX attended. A copy of the votes for HB 65 are shown below Defendant XXXX, states in ATGs XXXX newsletter ( Id 78 Exhibit ) as follows : E-filing is already in place in most Illinois counties, with the rest joining them soon. The partnership between industry leaders XXXX XXXX and XXXX & XXXX means more efficiency and cost savings for law firms and courts. Illinois filers can now access both the process services of XXXX XXXX ( a subsidiary of ATG ) and the electronic filing service ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) of XXXX XXXX XXXX, which are connected seamlessly through either company 's website. 
A reasonable person would ask why would XXXX, file a document manually and not electronically : ( i ) when they had already partnered with XXXX XXXX XXXX ( ii ) they provide services to lawyers and courts nationwide ( iii ) someone would have had to physically take the document ( s ) to the courthouse, ( iv ) when by e-filing per Defendant XXXX, a law firm can increase productivity as well as enjoy significant cost and time savings ( v ) Petitioner further notes the document was supposedly filed in the Chancery Division yet the file stamp used does not indicate that. ( vi ) The summons lacks a seal as [ EXHIBIT 21 ]. Making the case void from its inception. 
More and more it appears that a reasonable person would infer that Defendant XXXX is one of the top people in charge of the state and Federal Courts in Illinois and other states. 

The summons was allegedly signed by XXXX XXXX. This would be a red flag for a person that knows the law and can put pieces of a puzzle together. The job of issuing a summons is usually done by a Deputy Clerk. A Deputy Clerk can legally issue summonses in their name. A clerk can not sign XXXX XXXX name on a summons, a subpoena or any other documents that they can legally issue. They have to print and sign their own name. This is why when you see her name on a summons it is printed and not an actual signature. This makes sense for several reasons ( i ) in the First District located at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Illinois. XXXX XXXX the head clerk works in her office on a different floor from where court filings take place. With all her alleged duties she could not possibly sign summonses and subpoenas all day. ( ii ) In addition, the XXXX County Circuit Court has six locations/district courts in XXXX County therefore, it would be physically impossible for XXXX XXXX to sign every summons or subpoena that requires the signature of the clerk. Even if this case was legal and could be filed and was legally filed in XXXX County Chancery Division, the illegal legislation makes consumers believe that it effects XXXX County and well as other Counties such as XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX Counties and other counties. XXXX County does not have jurisdiction over these other counties. See XXXX XXXX. XXXX, XXXX  Vice President of Claims and litigation, XX/XX/XXXX XXXX article. 

This means that if you own property in neighborhood in a low economic area in XXXX county and multi-million dollar property in XXXX County, if you are member of the far right or far left you have been a victim of this scam committed by Republicans and Democrats. 
Per its own words XXXX freely states that it controls 100 % of the title insurance underwriting market in Illinois. Therefore, there can be no doubt that it is a monopoly and a casebook example at that. Diaz, Anselmo Lindberg is an employee of XXXX meaning they can not file foreclosures that use any of XXXX 's companies. 

On XXXX XXXX XXXX filed a XXXX XXXX with the XXXX County of Recorder of Deeds under penalty of perjury which he could not legally do because a foreclosure complaint was never filed with the court. All the documents contained an alleged judge 's stamp or no stamp at all. The XXXX 's file stamp is mandated by law to be placed on all documents filed with the court. This illegal action slandered the title to my property.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation