BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2020-06-25
Company: HW Holding, Inc
State: NV
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
In XXXX, I began disputing this date. Ive disputed the debt with the major credit bureaus, as well as Hunter Warfield. I have requested proof of validation. So far, none of the companies have been able to provide such proof. I have sent multiple follow-up letters to each of the companies, and there still is no proof. At this point, XXXX & XXXX no longer respond, or update the account. 

I have fully investigated my rights in this matter. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, if no proof is provided to me within 30 days, I may presume that no proof of the alleged debt, nor therefore any such debt, in fact exists. I have copies of the certified letters and dates as evidence of my requests ( see enclosed ). Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, these disputed items may not appear on my credit report if they can not be supported by any evidence. 
According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, if the debt cant be verified within 30 days, then it must be removed. XXXX XXXX with XXXX, XXXX and XXXX claim to have verified the debt, but this is, in fact not true under law. Simply contacting the alleged creditor, and asking them to match up numbers in their database, or or using the XXXX XXXX XXXX to input codes is not sufficient verification.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-02-05
Company: BROKER SOLUTIONS, INC.
State: CA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Closing on a mortgage

Complaint:
I am responding to New American Funding and to XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, Loan Administration. Unfortunately, New American Funding and XXXX XXXX claim is INCORRECT and the explanation provided has latent factors that are awry. Aforementioned in my original complaint filed on XX/XX/XXXX, aligns with the latest filing on XX/XX/XXXX. The request for PMI removal had required list of criteria that is outlined under the Homeowners Protection Act of XX/XX/XXXX. Those specific factors have been met and qualify for PMI removal. In addition, New American Funding requested a FORMAL WRITTEN REQUEST FOR PMI REMOVAL as I conterminously complied. However, New American Funding back trailed and asked to repeat considerations that had been acquired from the beginning. IN FACT, I have complied with those ALL steps for removing PMI. FIRST, XXXX XXXX failed to mention that during the process of New American Funding obtaining an Appraiser the Appraiser FAILED TO COMPLY with all property appraisal requirements and therefore, left out much preeminent factors to fairly appraise my property. FURTHERMORE, I find it peculiar that New American Funding chooses their own Appraiser and/or an Appraiser rather than selecting a third party that is conterminous with ALL PARTIES INVOLVED and remains a neutral disposition! Albeit, my property DID NOT HAVE A FAIR AND LEGAL ASSESSMENT as THEIR APPRAISER, New American Funding and XXXX XXXX FAILED TO RECOGNIZE the UPGRADES OF MY PROPERTY that would have CLEARLY met ALL REQUIREMENTS AT THE TIME. When I originally performed a public, market analysis of the property in XX/XX/XXXX, property value significantly increase to over 22 % and from XX/XX/XXXX. As the market value fluctuates, overall the home prices are increasing in valuation that impacts the specific criteria requirements. SECONDLY, in my original complaint with New American Funding I had proven that New American Funding had intentionally made delays for what appeared to be ulterior motives thereof. As with any considerations to PMI removal, the Homeowners Protection Act of XX/XX/XXXX recognizes fluctuations within the market in general. With that said, during the request for the removal of PMI and its process requires dedicated timelines outlined under the Homeowners Protection Act of XX/XX/XXXX. HENCE, from the beginning and as I ingeminate once again, in an effort to conterminously operate on a FAIR AND NEUTRAL ground, I am asking that I choose a third party to represent a choice in selection of a certified, licensed Property Appraiser to perform and conduct a fair assessment valuation for consideration of this matter thereof and, hereof! Since my request, it appears that New American Funding is failing to GRANT any parity and work together conterminously.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-12-07
Company: Source Receivables Management LLC
State: PA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Other debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was result of identity theft

Complaint:
This is a fraudulent account. Ive never had XXXX service nor a XXXX phone. My identity was stolen and multiple fraudulent accounts where opened under my name without my authorization and or knowledge. This account is one of them. Ive disputed the validity of this account with SOURCE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT several times to no avail. SOURCE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT refuses to provide me with the documentation Ive demanded them to provide me with, SOURCE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, refuse to remove this account out of my name and off my credit report. Ive included in the desired outcome section the letter mailed to SOURCE RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2021-08-22
Company: ALLY FINANCIAL INC.
State: IN
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Account status incorrect

Complaint:
On XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, I entered into a contract with XXXX, an online car dealer, to purchase a XXXX XXXX XXXX. After discovering numerous negative reviews and a revoked XXXX  rating, I decided to cancel contract on XX/XX/XXXX. I confirmed with sales rep that car was yet to be shipped. I was refunded my {$500.00} deposit, and was assured that lender would be contacted, regarding loan agreement. I received emails confirming cancellation and informing me that car was relisted for sale. 

On XX/XX/XXXX, I received an invoice from Ally Financial, regarding the vehicle that was canceled. Ally states that they never received cancellation notice, and are attempting to collect payment for a vehicle that I do not have. Ally would not access any confirming emails that contract was cancel. Daily calls have been made since XXXX, in the attempt to get XXXX to contact Ally. All customer service reps stated they were unable to help, and would have to transfer me to the " Buy Back '' department. Each transfer resulted in either a dropped call, or a dead end voicemail. Despite leaving numerous voicemails, i have not received any call back from XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-01
Company: CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
State: IN
Product: Vehicle loan or lease
Sub-product: Loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease
Sub-issue: Problem with fees charged

Complaint:
DEAR CFPB, this company CREDIT ACCEPTANCE, HAS CHARGED ME A XXXX LATE FEE EVERYTIME A PAYMENT WAS MADE FOR THE ENTIRE LOAN, THIS IS ILLEGAL AND WRONG, PLEASE HELP ME GET THIS REFUNDED TO ME ASAP, THIS GAS ALREADY BEEN TURNED INTO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THEY ARE NOT WILLING TO GIVE THIS MONEY BACK, WILL YOU HELP ME ASAP,30xXXXX-XXXX, PLESAE HELP ME GET THIS AND MY CAR TITLE TODAY?

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-12-07
Company: Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings LLC
State: MO
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage

Complaint:
I am under a modification as of XX/XX/XXXX, I lost my job in XX/XX/XXXX, which was a challenge but at least I had unemployment to rely on for a few weeks, I got back to work in XX/XX/XXXX ( The job market here in Missouri is seriously askew with phony job postings by recruiters filing their data bases ). After landing my new job shortly after I had a XXXX  injury, not job related. I was on and off work for two months. I once again submitted paper work for financial assistance, and was denied. I read over Harp and I see no reason why I would not qualify for assistance, but was told my Specialized loan Servicing that there was no help for me. I have tried to get my house modified to market value for years, it still is not. Enclosed are the copies of my modification, and the demand letter for a XXXX dollar house that is worth XXXX. I was not sent this information in writing by SLS, I got the information from a phone call. I also have a list of SLS phone calls to my cell phone, asking for someone that is not me on my voice mail.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-01-07
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
You have listed incorrect accounts on my credit report that should not be there at all. This is not only unfair to me, but also very troubling, because I have never committed or made any of the things you accuse me of doing. Investigate these accounts or I will take legal action against you.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-02-01
Company: SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit repair services
Issue: Problem with customer service

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX, Reporting and complaint about my credit problem I recently bought some thing from XXXX and I use the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX.There been a problem were I've tried to pay on the card and tried to login and it's not letting me pay on it and I've called the company and its been 3 mouths and the payment keeps going up. 


My XXXX XXXX number is : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX social number : XXXX email : XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2017-12-07
Company: CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
State: FL
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Mortgage debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was paid

Complaint:
The complaint is in regards to Citizens Bank. I have a home equity line of credit with them. The payment was due on XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX they called to tell me I was late. In actuality they were paid by bank check transfer on XX/XX/XXXX in the amount exceeding 5 times the minimum payment. I checked the account on line on XXXX in the late evening and found no record of the payment. I called their informtion line and got a message the office was closed leave a number and they will call back. They never did. I called again on XXXX and was told the payment was received on XXXX. I had checked with my bank and was told they sent the check XXXX. I can not be responsible if Citizen Bank can not record the transactions property If Citizen Bank received the payment on XXXX why did they call on XXXX. This is an harassing tactic for NO reason. I have NEVER been late with them. On another occasion the payment was made on time and the next months statement had a notion of a past due amount. I asked them to correct it and they refused. I wrote a letter for them to correct it and it was ignored. This bank is totally negligent.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-05
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I've recently checked my credit report from Experian and I was shocked to see previously deleted fraudulent accounts were reinserted back to my credit file. I am a victim of identity theft, and I did not authorize anyone to open accounts under my name. I am requesting to investigate and remove the fraudulent accounts from my credit report as soon as possible.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-06-05
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681 XXXX   XXXX XXXX, XXXX don't have the required by federal law to verify - through the physical verification of the original signed consumer contract - any and all accounts they post on a credit report to assure maximum accuracy. I told XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX Without proper verification by your company, anyone paying for your reporting services could fax, mail or email in a fraudulent account. 

According to the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 611 ( a ) [ 15 USC 1681i ( a ) ], these disputed items must be reinvestigated or deleted from my credit record within 30 days. During the investigation period, these items must be removed from my credit report as the mere reporting of items prior to debt validation constitutes collection activity and they told me no. I am also requesting the names, addresses and telephone numbers of individuals you contacted during your investigation. 

I demand to see a copy of the Verifiable Proof ( an original Consumer Contract with my Signature on it ) that you used to verify that the account belonged to me the first time you reported the account on my credit report and they told me they don't have it. XXXX  XXXX XXXX, XXXX failure to properly verify these accounts has hurt my ability to obtain credit. Under the FCRA 15 U.S.C. 1681, unverified accounts must be promptly deleted. If XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX are unable to provide me with a copy of the verifiable proof that you have on file within 30 days for each of the accounts listed below then you must remove these accounts from my credit report. Please provide me with a copy of an updated and corrected credit report showing these items removed.

Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2018-06-05
Company: SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
State: TN
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Opening an account
Sub-issue: Didn't receive terms that were advertised

Complaint:
On XX/XX/XXXX, I opened a select checking account at SunTrust at their office located at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, TN XXXX. This was after multiple attempts to open it online and over the phone which all failed. I was told that I had to go into the office to open it, so I did. 

I opened this account with SunTrust only to fulfill the requirements for the SunTrust XXXX Mortgage Program I joined for my condo. SunTrust sent me a flyer advertising a {$250.00} reward for opening this select checking account ( attached ). I read the flyer and was under the impression that as long as I fulfill all the requirements listed there I'll receive the {$250.00} reward. So I made the {$100.00} deposit on account opening, set up the $ XXXX monthly direct deposit for my salary, and made more than 10 purchases with the SunTrust debit card. On XX/XX/XXXX I contacted SunTrust via their online portal asking how I would receive the award and I was told that to receive an answer I had to go into a local office. So I went to their office on XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX and the agent told me the problem was that the promo code on the flyer was not documented at the account opening. He said he would contact relevant staff the same day. There was no update. So I contacted the staff who had been in touch with me as I was originally applying for the mortgage. There was still no update. 

This is very frustrating because during the multiple contacts with the SunTrust staff when I tried to open the account online, over the phone, and in person, no one ever asked me about promo code. And the so-called promo code was placed on the top of page 2, which doesn't even say " code ''. Therefore I didn't notice it until the agent told me about it when I was at the XXXX XXXX office on XX/XX/XXXX. Now SunTrust is saying this was not documented at account opening and refusing to give the {$250.00} reward. I feel like this is a trick they play on me as a customer. The process of opening this checking account has been long and difficult enough, and now they are refusing to fulfill their promise even though it's not my responsibility. 

The whole experience of mortgage application and checking account opening with SunTrust has been unpleasant. I would not recommend it to anyone based on what I went through.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-01
Company: Resurgent Capital Services L.P.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
About 30 days ago I submitted a dispute to XXXX regarding an account that had been previously DELETED, yet unexpectedly added to my credit file again. I asked the reporting agency how could they add a debt that was one, proven not mine the first time I disputed it, and two, that you did not validate before added an account that had already been removed. XXXX  confirmed the debt, without validation as this is NOT my debt, I have never had business with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. The debt that was deleted was LVNV Funding LLC. How can the same account be owned by TWO creditors, and also they have attempted to ILLEGALLY re-age the debt to the time is seems like XXXX XXXX XXXX purchased the account, which is a direct violation of the FCRA. More importantly, this was a debt that one company claimed to own ( LVNV Funding LLC ) two years ago, XXXX validated it without cause, then deleted it, they were supposed to notify me in WRITING of an attempt to add a debt that had been previously removed as invalid

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-07-31
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NV
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
There is a collection with XXXX XXXX reporting on my credit file. I have asked the credit companies to validate the debt because I am XXXX XXXX XXXX covered under the VA so this would be under the VA. It may be a mistaken name or something like that but my medical coverage is the government. Please help me with this

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-01
Company: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
State: GA
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Managing an account
Sub-issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
Back in XXXX of XXXX USAA closed my checking account. Its XX/XX/XXXX now and I receive a XXXX  debit cancelation of date XX/XX/XXXX for the amount of {$1600.00}. The account is closed done not active no longer have a debit card for the account. Yet usaa excepted retro pay from my VA XXXX compensation and pension claim on XXXX XX/XX/XXXX ( yet the account is closed or they told me it was ). Usaa is now holding my funds and will not release them. Saying I owed money from an account they sent me a XXXX for  debit cancellation on and I filed with my XXXX taxes. Usaa is disrespectful to XXXX veterans. Why would you take money from and struggling XXXX veteran. I left usaa years ago for this very reason they dont care about the consumer. Usaa I want all of my money back and since this is the only way to not wait 45 mins to speak to someone I will write a complaint daily that you yall are committing tax fraud and stealing money from XXXX veterans.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-07-31
Company: CORELOGIC INC
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
On XX/XX/2018 Credco showed up on my credit report as a hard inquiry. I did not apply for a loan with this company.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2021-03-30
Company: Ocwen Financial Corporation
State: CA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Mortgage debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Sub-issue: Threatened or suggested your credit would be damaged

Complaint:
Account number : XXXX Unpaid Principal Balance : {$29000.00} Interest Amount Due : $ XXXX Late Charges Due : XXXX Advance and Other Expenses : XXXX I called the company PHH Mortgage Services XXXX XX/XX/2021 for information on the account they have under my name. The company could not find any record of the debt they are accusing me for. There is no record of the debt! I want the company PHH Mortgage to delete it from my credit report.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-01
Company: ARVEST BANK GROUP, INC.
State: MO
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Problem with a lender or other company charging your account
Sub-issue: Transaction was not authorized

Complaint:
Arvest Bank allow XXXX go into my account and try to debit it {$380.00}, I did not authorization this transaction and I do not have overdraft protection. Now I am receiving notices from the bank indicating I have a negative balance of - {$290.00} and it must to paid by XX/XX/2019 or will be charged-off. I did not believe this is fair, I did not authorization XXXX into my account, I did not even have overdraft protection on this account, and I am not understanding how XXXX charges can be submitted if you don't have overdraft protection, I have not used XXXX for over 1 year and I have tried to make arrangements with them, but you can never get to the correct person to speak with, everyone tells you something different. I want these charges removed from my checking account.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation