Consumer complaint received 2017-06-18
Company: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
State: CA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: I do not know
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was already discharged in bankruptcy and is no longer owed

Complaint:
This law firm   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   SB #  XXXX    XXXX   XXXX   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  , #   XXXX     XXXX   XXXX  , CA  XXXX  telephone  XXXX  They are working with a company   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   to commit fraud on the   XXXX    FAMILY, this law firm and the above company is also working with a company named   XXXX   XXXX  , and   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  , whom  XXXX  had already wrote demand to validated the debt letters to, and letters disupting the debt. Even Though these letters were sent out the these entities   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  ,   XXXX   XXXX  , and   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   none every responded to   XXXX   which was their Article/Title 5 responsibility to do. Once the fraud was committed by   XXXX   XXXX  , and   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  , then   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   was also sent the letters from  XXXX  and also did not respond.
Currently,   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  , is working with   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   that is creating fake documents with   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   to steal the   XXXX    home and property.  XXXX  sent out documents to rebut all presumptions of   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  .  XXXX  were supposed to have a jury trial till a summary judgement for unlawful detainer was filed.
Currently   XXXX   had a judgment not in their favor, even thought they showed a judge evidence that they have not debt to foreclose on. And own the Note and are in possession of the note that invalidates the deed of trust that they are trying to foreclose on. There are other evidence that show there is no debt like a report from the secretary of state on the UCC that shows there is no debt since  XXXX  and no current debt owed. I have filed over 15 reports about that same senario but different parties doing this to us over and over again.
The Judge   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   in this case was also trying to work for the Plaintiff and was rushing to judgment even though he did not look through the paperwork. Much of the paperwork prepared by   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   was all manufactured fraudulent done by   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  .  XXXX  found out that the judge also has a pension based in mortgage backed securities and also retired back in  XXXX . He has been out of active practice of law for 10 years, and   XXXX    asked him about certain cases he had no idea, not even knowledgable of IRC 860G and REMIC trusts so he was not qualified to judge this case.  XXXX  feel he acted prejudicail to   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  , since he was helping them craft arguments against  XXXX . Each argument   XXXX   objection handled and diffused. Explaining that there was no mortgage to foreclose on, and that the Judgment listed in the count record was from court fees  XXXX  already paid through the court to the county comptroller. So there is no judgment or mortgage debt they could have purchased in a foreclosure auction. This is a new tactic since they did not respond to any of the other debt dispute letters/or demand for debt validation, any of the companies prepetrating this fraud were non-compliant to respond.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation