BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2020-01-29
Company: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
State: CA
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Savings account
Issue: Managing an account
Sub-issue: Deposits and withdrawals

Complaint:
On XX/XX/2020, Goldman Sachs ( Marcus by Goldman Sachs ) emailed a promotional offer to me offering a {$100.00} credit for depositing {$10000.00} in new funds into my existing Marcus Account, and in particular to my Online Savings Account within my Marcus Account. 

The terms stated that the funds must remain, as well as existing funds at the time of the deposit, for at least 60 days. The specific language was " After enrollment, you must deposit {$10000.00} or more in new funds ( internal transfers wont count ) into a Marcus Online Savings Account within 10 days of enrollment and maintain at least {$10000.00} of those new funds in your account in addition to your account balance at the time of enrollment for 60 consecutive days from the date of reaching the required dollar amount. '' Note the  deposit account specifies the online savings account, but the maintain clause simply says " your account ''. 

I made a qualifying deposit on XXXX XXXX A few days later I made an internal transfer with my Marcus account between the Online Savings Account and another online deposit account. Marcus deemed this transfer to disqualify me from the promotional offer. No funds were removed from my Marcus account, and in fact additional funds were added days later.

I contacted Marcus and pointed out that their use of the word account was used by them both to re
fer to the sub-account which called the Online Savings Account and to my total deposit account with Marcus, and that the promotion did not specify which usage was meant. I offered the service representative and subsequently her supervisor the opportunity to restore the promotional offer to my account, so that their treatment would comport with a simple English reading of their promotional materials. After consultation with some internal group, each declined to do so and explained to me why I was at fault.

I believe the service reps that Goldman Sachs meant the smaller sub-account in their design and execution of the promotion. I also believe, however, that they should be accountable to living up to the simple English reading of their offer. I do not believe that I should lose out because their staff were sloppy in their use of ambiguous language in their offering. Goldman Sachs neither did so in the initial case, nor did they correct the error when I pointed it out to their customer service contacts.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-11-07
Company: Revolut Technologies Inc.
State: TX
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Managing an account
Sub-issue: Banking errors

Complaint:
On XX/XX/XXXX my cell phone was stolen. I was using Revolut as my banking servicer. There were charges that were made on the device before it was wiped after reporting it stolen. I attempted to dispute these transactions as fraud to Revolut. The " security team '' at revolut confirmed access to my accounts from another device and stated it was compromised. However before the security team even finished securing my accounts the " chargeback team '' had already claimed to resolve the dispute stating no fraud activity. Completely against the information that was provided to me by the security team. I requested that the case be properly investigated and Revolut informed me multiple times that the chargback was rejected by them and they would not investigate. After multiple times attempting to get them to review the information and screen shots of the conversations with their own security team. They still refused and stated they will not do anything one a resolution was made final. The timing of the quick response and rejection of the dispute as well as the results of the dispute being provided WHILE my account was locked down by the security team who had me reset my passwords and made sure to secure my account, shows that Revolut ignored the regulations to fully investigate the reported dispute in good faith. They refused to re open the dispute and use the information provided to them by their own security team, and based on the evidence provided a result knowingly and willfully when such a conclusion could not have reasonably have been drawn. I spoke with another representative regarding a request to receive all of the dispute documentation including the investigation notes from the security team showing unauthorized activity on my account. The representative informed me that they only provide the results to the dispute and that when a dispute is final there is no way for them to make any changes. I also requested clarification as to why the dispute team did not use the information about my account compromise. I was not provided any avenue to get clarification. This again is against the banking regulations requiring documentation at my request.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-03-21
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting act. 
The List of accounts below has violated my federally protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality under 15 USC 1681 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ... ... HAS VIOLATED MY RIGHTS. 

15 U.S.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S.C 1681 Section 604 A. Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions 15 U.S.C 1681c. ( a ) ( 5 ) Section States : no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the reports by more than seven years.

15 U.S.C 1681s-2 ( A ) ( 1 ) A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-11-30
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: FL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The List of accounts below have violated my federal protected consumer rights to privacy and confidentiality under 15 USC 1681. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Has an inaccurate amount of late payments and is violating my privacy. 

15 US.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S.C 1681 Section 604 A Section 2 : It also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions 15 U.S.C 1681c. ( a ) ( 5 ) Section States : no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information Any other adverse item of information, other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more man seven years 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ( A ) ( 1 ) A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the Information is inaccurate.

15 U.S.C. 1681 section 611 ( 5 ) Treatment of Inaccurate or Unverifiable Information ( A ) In general. If, after any reinvestigation under paragraph ( 1 ) of any information disputed by a consumer, an item of the information is found to be INACCURATE or INCOMPLETE or can not be verified, the consumer reporting agency shall ( i ) promptly delete that item of information from the file of the consumer, or modify that item of information, as appropriate, based on the results of the reinvestigation; and ( ii ) promptly notify the furnisher of that information that the information has been modified or deleted from the file of the consumer.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-10-19
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
Your efficiency and prompt attention to correcting some of the adverse information previously stated on my credit file is appreciated, yet there are still items that need to be addressed again and to be corrected immediately. The three credit bureaus must verify these items in accordance with Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). It is not acceptable to report these items as unconfirmed information without validating them within the legally required time range. Please update the following inaccurate items in my report : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-03-21
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
Despite multiple written requests, the unverified items listed below continue to report on my credit report in violation of federal law. These items must be validated in accordance with Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). If you do not validate these items, I will take legal action against you. Please follow the law so that this matter can be resolved as soon as possible. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-11-30
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
Despite multiple written requests, the erroneous accounts listed below continue to report on my credit report in violation of federal law. The last letter I sent to the Credit bureaus was Dated XXXX XXXX ; but I never received a response from them. These accounts must be investigated and deleted in accordance with Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ). If you do not validate these accounts, I will take legal action against you. Please follow the law so that this matter can be resolved as soon as possible. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-08-05
Company: Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc.
State: CA
Product: Vehicle loan or lease
Sub-product: Loan
Issue: Managing the loan or lease
Sub-issue: Problem with the interest rate

Complaint:
I was approved for a loan with Santander Consumer USA a few years ago. I feel like I was approved with a high interest rate with expectations of defaulting on the loan. I feel like my balance has not changed even after making constant payments. I actually now owe more than the actual principal. My interest rate is over 25 % and its been very difficult to stay on top of it. Im not sure if I am eligible under this class action lawsuit against them but any information would be great. I think that its crooked and unfair that they approved vulnerable people with low credit scores just to add a high interest rate so they can default from loan.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-03-21
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NC
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act XXXX Account # XXXX, has violated my rights. 

15 U.S.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy.

15 U.S.C 1681 section 604 A Section 2 : it also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish a account without my written instructions

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2023-05-26
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX Experian XXXX Account # : XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Type : Revolving Revolving Revolving Account Type - Detail : Charge account Charge account - Bureau Code : Individual Individual Individual Account Status : Paid Paid Paid Monthly Payment : {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} Date Opened : XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Balance : {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} No. of Months ( terms ) : XXXX XXXX XXXX High Credit : {$260.00} {$260.00} {$300.00} XXXX XXXX : {$300.00} {$300.00} {$0.00} Past Due : {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} Payment Status : Late 90 Days Late 90 Days Late 90 Days Last Reported : XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX CREDIT DISPUTE NOTES THE DATE OPENED/DATE CLOSED/ LAST PAYMENT DATE IS INACCURATE ON THE CREDIT BUREAS.ALSO THE ACCOUNT NUMBER IS INCOMPLETE THIS IS GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL.DUE THAT FACT IS CLAIMED AS FRAUD FROM A FEDERALLY PROTECTED CONSUMER IT MUST BE REMOVED FROM CONSUMERS REPORT ACCORDING TO " FAIR CARES ACT '' ANYTHING A CONSUMER REPORTS AS FRAUD MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSUMERS CONSUMERS REPORT WITH IN 4 BUSINESS DAYS OF FRAUD RECEIPT DATE

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-08-31
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: WA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Difficulty submitting a dispute or getting information about a dispute over the phone

Complaint:
Today, XX/XX/2019, I attempted to perform several online disputes for account that were inaccurate, duplicates, or not mine. The company refused to perform the investigations, stating : They are not required to investigate previously disputed items. I also wrote several letters that were rejected because they were deemed fraudulent.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-12-19
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I spoke with Transunion & XXXX about the old address XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX NJ and the old other address that I clearly ask them to remove! They fail to remove all the old address I currently not there no more they are keeping the current! The only address Im currently at and I have residential there is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX NJ. When I dispute theses accusation they fail to remove all the address they told me it would take 24 to 48 hours for them to remove them! Im going to file a lawsuit again them for wrongful inaccuracies on my credit report today. Im a victim here and this needs to be investigate soon as possible, when you do show them proof they discard your evidence of proof that you sent to them. This is totally not fair to any consumer who are not being protected by the law of the consumer right. I have the right to dispute and if anything thing looks too suspicious I have the right to dispute it with evidence of proof!

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-08-05
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Unable to get your credit report or credit score
Sub-issue: Problem getting your free annual credit report

Complaint:
I have been trying to view my credit report from Equifax. 

Have tried to view my credit report from 1. XXXX XXXX XXXX 2. XXXX and 3. XXXX online monitoring service. 

Equifax is preventing me from viewing my credit report for errors or valid information. 
This is a violation!

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-05-09
Company: Penn Credit Corporation
State: OH
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I have lodged disputes with XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and Penn Credit Corp with the belief they have reported negative items to my credit report not in compliance with Consumer Protection law. Specifically, the FCRA and the FDCPA. I most recently requested them to investigate beginning in XX/XX/XXXX, with subsequent requests in XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. I started this process again in XX/XX/XXXX. I have also asked for assistance from each of the credit bureaus

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-12-19
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: GA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX SSN : XXXX DOB : XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX I initially send an investigation letter to XXXX to investigate XXXX bankruptcy cases # XXXX and # XXXX that's currently listed on my consumer report back on XX/XX/XXXX, in which all XXXX consumer agencies, XXXX, XXXX, and Experian responded back and listed those bankruptcies as verified. After those results, I investigated the third party agency that XXXX, XXXX, and Experian stated that they used to verify those bankruptcies with, which was XXXX XXXX. Then I sent method of verification letters to XXXX XXXX to investigate both bankruptcies ( # XXXX ) and ( # XXXX ) and they were not able to verify that these bankruptcies, in which in turn XXXX XXXX removed these records from my consumer report with that reporting agency. This makes these cases unverifiable and should be removed from my XXXX, XXXX, and Experian consumer reports. I sent XXXX, XXXX, and Experian a copy of the XXXX XXXX investigation results, and they still responded that the bankruptcy cases # XXXX and # XXXX were properly verified, and it still remains on all XXXX consumer reports unlawfully. According to FCRA, if these bankruptcies are unverified by the third party agency XXXX XXXX, so by consumer law protection, these bankruptcy cases should be removed immediately from all XXXX consumer reporting agencies as well. If these consumer reporting agencies are to be investigated as of today XX/XX/XXXX, these bankruptcies ( # XXXX and # XXXX ) remain on my consumer report unproperly verified, which is in clear violation of FCRA.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-17
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
A few days ago XXXX sent me documents stating there was a freeze on the account and than a few days later XXXX changed the name to the right name and than changed it back to the XXXX up name. Ofcourse this is what happens in the great XXXX scandal. Lawsuits are being arranged since this is a distraction. but I have several remedies to end this.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-08-05
Company: EOS Holdings, Inc.
State: MD
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Other debt
Issue: Written notification about debt
Sub-issue: Didn't receive enough information to verify debt

Complaint:
I got a phone call from a company claiming to be collecting a debt from XXXX XXXX. I asked them to mail me verification of the debt including any contracts or paperwork signed by me. They did not send me verification of debt only a letter from them stating that they verified the debt. That does help me as I have no memory of this debt or doing business with XXXX XXXX.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-11-09
Company: Recovco Mortgage Management, LLC
State: FL
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Applying for a mortgage or refinancing an existing mortgage

Complaint:
In XXXX, my Broker applied a mortgage with SPROUT MORTGAGE. 
After two months of 0 update on my application, three weeks ago, my broker received an email from XXXX ( LOAN officer ) saying that we have been approved, the same day my title company receive an email from XXXX telling him that it was a LOAN CLOSER from SPROUT MORTGAGE In the Email from XXXX XXXX asked to make an appointment for the closing on XX/XX/XXXX, so we did! But it was the last email received from SPROUT MORTGAGE, the Title Company never received anything else From SPROUT MORTGAGE. everybody just vanished!!! 
My Broker, my realtor XXXX XXXX and I have sent many emails, and we try to Contact SPROUT MORTGAGE Without any response.

Company public response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation