Consumer complaint received 2018-02-21
Company: Navient Solutions, LLC.
State: CA
Product: Student loan
Sub-product: Federal student loan servicing
Issue: Dealing with your lender or servicer
Sub-issue: Received bad information about your loan

Complaint:
This complaint is regarding loans made with XXXX XXXX and serviced by Navient when I intended to attend the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I deferred one year to pursue XXXX   work opportunities and then obtained a loan to attend through XXXX XXXX. Unfortunately, some of the privacy and human rights violations I am experiencing currently connected to theft of commercial projects actually began well prior. For example surrounding an XXXX process I invented blindly amidst perceiving numerous maintained discovery efforts from malicious individuals but also notably those connected to copyright XXXX which is a film connected the anti nuclear movement from the XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. I made the copyright in XXXX XXXX 's name. This after the loans. However, project discussed well prior. She was someone who was a cosigner in the application. Due to cost of tuition, living and return on investment relative to my desired career prospects I decided not to attend. However, due to the nature of what I am experiencing I do believe her being a cosigner but also submitting my details to the XXXX for a XXXX XXXX and also applying to the school generally did have implications with regards to how the current violations I am experiencing being facilitated. For example with XXXX XXXX, some of her family has been exceedingly malicious to me and one group currently involved isolating me and monitoring my accounts and participating in harassing behaviors. One indicator is I often received bizarre hijacked communications and one of them was regarding XXXX XXXX and had an odd list of her other family some of it not all malicious to me and due to discovery efforts could have been for those purposes by them or others. However beyond this, I believe this application could have different purposes. For example I can prove a connection to the NSA and whereby I do believe XXXX has long since been involved as well. With the numerous peers based in the XXXX I don't think that would be necessary. I did file a report with the XXXX in the XXXX but they have read but not responded. Like in the US I have received suspicious communications from groups indicating they have no involvement such as the Serious Fraud Office but I do believe they are hijacked communications and in fact reflect the opposite. I recently received information from the US Dept of ED regarding these loans and I am requesting any information held at XXXX XXXX with regards to myself and disclosure of any issues and information shared including XXXX based entities. If there have been any privacy lapses I am requesting redress and repayment for damages as well as any conflicts of interest related to the takeover attempt of my commercial projects also that has influenced this. I did not attend but believe this is probably something those involved in this situation would use. Please note that XXXX XXXX from the Environmental Defense Center named as reference on loans is someone I believe also involved and targeted in personal issues. I have named in complaints with the EPA as a witness in multiple complaints but is also someone relevant to history of my XXXX as the EDC was founded during the anti nuclear movement and the first case was regarding XXXX XXXX which XXXX XXXX was involved in. The EDC is something that would be broached in the filmed portrayal of the events as well as any behind the scenes and making of. In communications with XXXX XXXX I did at one point reference making them a fractional beneficiary of elements of proceeds given connection and potential tax benefits and those involved could deduce it's relative importance that way. The EDC has filmed XXXX XXXX and also I believe in negotiation settings privileges to other rights relative to malicious groups trying to takeover and diminish those things amidst the irony of trying to exploit it. XXXX XXXX has handled her accounting for her campaigns in the past and could also be included in this as well. I have referenced the ongoing hijacked communications I have received from XXXX. One of them does reference XXXX actually but it is different then those I receive now which are much more volatile. In having my communications cut off and crippled, those involved are seeking to compel personal deterioration and economic destitution an I believe these loans are a factor. I do know the cosigner has recently went into foreclosure and want to know also if this factored in and concerned about copyright also. Amidst constraints imposed I believe what is occurring is intentional. Note some of the XXXX issues I do believe are occurring in the XXXX as well. For example, the release of XXXX XXXX 's rendition of XXXX XXXX XXXX on XXXX XXXX. Or material that is indirectly referential to the situation such as XXXX XXXX 's XXXX XXXX XXXX or the Television Show XXXX XXXX. I have initiated complaints and investigations such as the FTC with XXXX XXXX 's XXXX XXXX. As this material occurs again those involved denying me information continue to seek to compel personal and financial destitution. Please note I intend to ensure copyright in my name as originally put in XXXX XXXX 's but believe constraints like this designed to prevent it by those involved in conspired takeover attempt.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation