Consumer complaint received 2023-06-07
Company: TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC.
State: TX
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
Follow up from CFPB file XXXX I was asked to provide proof of my social security number, via phone call placed XX/XX/XXXX. Due to my family and I being displaced, and homeless, ( due to the debt in dispute ), I am unable to receive correspondence. I express my apologies, as I will fully cooperate in any part of this investigation, to get this debt removed. 

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT In XXXX of XXXX, I submitted a dispute to Transunion against XXXX XXXX XXXX  ' attempt to collect a debt not owed, of over {$16000.00}, on behalf of XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. To validate my claim, I uploaded a Writ of Re-Entry document, granted by XXXX XXXX in XXXX  of XXXX, granting access to the unit, ruling there was no prior rent due, nor prior debt owed to the community. Also included in the uploads were court documents showing XXXX XXXX XXXX ' cause of eviction, including a XXXX  balance, on the rent balance owed line, submitted to the Court. CFPB file number XXXX ( to include the same company in the same dispute ), upon completion of the investigation, was submitted to the FTC for enforcement XXXX entering XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX into the Consumer Sentinel Network . Because of this finding Transunion, ( nor any other credit bureau ), should not be allowed to uphold a debt that was fraudulently submitted against court orders and referred to the FTC for enforcement by the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX attempted to present a court document regarding an eviction case they lost in XXXX of XXXX, citing rent owed, however in this case the Court too, ruled in my favor, as XXXX XXXX XXXX  cashed the money orders presented via XXXX XXXX, and filed for eviction without cause. Because they lost the original case in XXXX, I was still a resident, illegally locked out of the unit in XXXX, with a Judge granting my access to the unit in XXXX. Upon being escorted to the property via a XXXX XXXX XXXX, we discovered ( the deputy and I ) the unit had already been rented to new tenants, with my property disposed of. Between the Writ of Re-Entry dated XX/XX/XXXX by the Court, and the filing of this debt placed on my credit report, the same month after the Judge ruled, against Court orders, is upholding this community in retaliation, as the same community in the complaint acknowledged prior, no rent being owed as their Cause of Eviction in XXXX. My argument is because my family and I were locked out in XXXX, with no balance owed, XXXX XXXX XXXX should not be allowed to collect for a debt not owed nor disputed in the original argument that XXXX XXXX XXXX lost in court. They placed this debt on my credit report, against court orders, to retaliate against me.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief