BEE-spoke-data/consumer-finance-complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint received 2023-11-08
Company: Security Credit Services, LLC
State: AR
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Credit card debt
Issue: Took or threatened to take negative or legal action
Sub-issue: Threatened to sue you for very old debt

Complaint:
This company trying to collect on debt that I have no knowledge of and I never done business with this company XXXX XX/XX/2023 I asked to provide me proof that I have done business with the company copy of contract and social security number and date of birth copy of picture Id.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-12
Company: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
State: NY
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems
Sub-issue: Other problem

Complaint:
I called XX/XX/XXXX to combine my secured line with my unsecured line. I was told intially that it needed to be reviewed after I was willing to close the account. To stop me from closing my account the young lady stated to call back between the following Tuesday-Friday. In hopes of a solution as promised I called today Tuesday XX/XX/XXXX. The account was not noted and I was not met with solution. I was told the option to combine my accounts were removed at this time and no one could further assist me. I was never notified that I even had the option to do so. My account was open XX/XX/XXXX, I never missed a payment. Where in the contract does it say they can make such changes without notifying me or extending me opportunity. I also requested a limit increase in the secured line and I was responded with they dont do increases for secured Lines but today Im being informed that every so often its reviewed and automatically increased. Yet that has not happened for two years. Customer service is horrible. They tried to make me feel like closing the account wasnt an option because it would hurt my age history as if I was incompetent. I asked to be directed to the proper department that handles such issues and they refused to assist. The accounts I was asking to be increased, combined and my deposit refunded end on # XXXX and # XXXX.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-06-09
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: PA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
Fraud Accounts on credit report 1. XXXX XXXX {$550.00} 2. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$210.00} 3. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$43000.00} Inquiries 1. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 2 XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 3.XXXX  XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX/XX/XXXX 4. XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 5.XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 6. XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 7. XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-07-30
Company: JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
State: CA
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Fees or interest
Sub-issue: Charged too much interest

Complaint:
As has been previously documented with this company on a monthly basis since XXXX XXXX  XXXX, I opened a " Chase Plan '' for 18 monthly payments - no interest - no fee- as confirmed in writing by them on XX/XX/XXXX. 

This no interest plan should end XX/XX/XXXX. 

Despite this they have charged me incorrect interest fees- most recently {$34.00} on XX/XX/XXXX and {$35.00} on XX/XX/XXXX. Total of {$70.00} I have paid for all my new purchases in full. I have even apparently prepaid the purchase amount in the chase plan in full early. I have sent corresponding documentation every single month. I have called the customer service line and spoken with a representative who indicates that I have no 18 month chase plan.

It makes absolutely no sense that any finance charge should have been applied to this bill in XXXX and XXXX.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-07-29
Company: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
State: GA
Product: Checking or savings account
Sub-product: Checking account
Issue: Opening an account
Sub-issue: Account opened as a result of fraud

Complaint:
On XX/XX/23 I received in my mailbox 15 debit cards from the Navy federal credit union that I never applied for. I contacted them about this and they were shocked that this happened. I also received text messages from them on XX/XX/23 if I used a card for {$1.00} several times. They told me that they are going to close the account and follow through by calling me on Monday to see what to do next.

Company public response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Company response to consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2020-12-18
Company: Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
State: TX
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Medical debt
Issue: Attempts to collect debt not owed
Sub-issue: Debt was result of identity theft

Complaint:
I've sent multiple letters to this agency about this not being my account. After being advised by identitytheft.gov, I've completed and sent a fraud affidavit via certified mail. I can see they received it, but nothing has changed. See supporting documents. Even the USPS tracking. My official complaint is against COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL. My information was used to obtain an apartment, cell phone, and an auto loan with my ex-partner. I am a victim of identity theft and have put this off for too long. I've completed the proper steps, 1. notify creditors 2. police report 3. informed the state of Texas. The individual I've suspected for this theft is now deceased, and the police department said to contact the federal trade commission to seek relief. These companies disregard laws and dont care whos credit or lives they impact.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-04-20
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
I appreciate your taking the time to DELETE some of the erroneous items in my credit file ; however, there are still many items that need to be DELETED. The credit bureaus must verify these items under Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ). ( A ). I'm hoping that these disputed items be DELETED immediately. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-02-07
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: CA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX 15 U.S.C 1681 section 602 A. States I have the right to privacy. 

15 U.S.C 1681 Section 604 A Section 2 : it also states a consumer reporting agency can not furnish an account without my written instructions 15 U.S.C 1681c ( a ) ( 5 ) Section States no consumer reporting agency may make any consumer report containing any of the following items of information. Any other adverse item of information other than records of convictions of crimes which antedates the report by more than XXXXXXXX XXXX 15 U.S.C 1681s-2 ( A ) ( 1 ) A person shall not furnish any information relating to a consumer to any consumer reporting agency if the person knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the information is inaccurate

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-12-18
Company: SANTANDER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: MD
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Problem with a purchase shown on your statement
Sub-issue: Card was charged for something you did not purchase with the card

Complaint:
There are numerous automatic charges on my debit card with Santander Bank. I did not authorize these charges and do not want these charges. I wanted the money refunded back to me. The bank sent me a letter saying my claim had been rejected for {$160.00}.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-02-07
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
The unverified account indicated below continues to report on my credit report despite several written requests, in violation of federal law. I dated the previous letter I sent to Experian on XX/XX/2023, but I never received a response. Sections 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) and 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) require this account to be authenticated ( A ). I will take legal action against you if you do not validate this account. Please follow the law so that this situation can be settled quickly. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-02-03
Company: Grant & Weber
State: CA
Product: Debt collection
Sub-product: Medical debt
Issue: Written notification about debt
Sub-issue: Didn't receive enough information to verify debt

Complaint:
I noticed 2 collection accounts from the same collector on my credit report ( {$95.00} and {$88.00} ), Since I never received a notification of these debts I searched the collection agency on internet and called. During the first call to the collection agency -XX/XX/2019- I was informed that the collector had 5 accounts under my name and social security number, with a total of {$300.00}. I asked for a full itemized statement since I never see the original invoices for these 5 accounts, the collector agreed so send the a full itemize statement. After several weeks waiting for the statements, I called the collector one more time -XX/XX/2019-, they claim they sent the itemized statements, but I never received it so I requested for second time, the collector told me the itemized statements can take 2 weeks to send ; since the hospital have search the files and later sent to the collector, that is a red flag because the collector don't know what exactly they are collecting, they don't have the invoices to collect. I haven't received the statements yet.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-09-12
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: OH
Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Report provided to employer without your written authorization

Complaint:
In accordance with fair credit reporting act, this creditor has violated my rights. Under 15 US C 1681 section 602 states I have the right to privacy 15 US C 1681 section 604a section 2 it also states that consumer reporting agency can not furnish an account without my written instructions, under 15 US c 1666B a creditor may not treat a Payment on an credit card account under and open and consumer creditor as late for any purpose.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2020-08-26
Company: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FNIS)
State: MN
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Incorrect information on your report
Sub-issue: Information belongs to someone else

Complaint:
I sent a letter to Chex Systems to dispute the following unpaid fraudulent account listed on my Consumer Report ID : XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX. The unpaid XXXX XXXX XXXX account is fraudulent and not my account. I never applied for or had a checking account with XXXX XXXX XXXX.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-06-20
Company: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
State: IL
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
XXXX, XXXX, Experian is reporting inaccurate information to my credit reports based on wrong information given to them by the following collection agencies. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX I did not give nor did I sign any contract given the original creditors the right to sell the account for the purposes of harassing me and damaging my credit. 
Also XXXX XXXX XXXX is reporting my medical information which is a violation according to the Hippa Law. XXXX is the second collection company that my medical info has been sent to.

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2022-08-28
Company: Westlake Services, LLC
State: VA
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Credit inquiries on your report that you don't recognize

Complaint:
I checked my personal credit report, which I acquired from XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XX/XX/2022 and I noticed Multiple unauthorized credit inquiries had been made. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, I Have the authority to take action against institutions engaging in unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices. Under the terms of the proposed consent order filed today these inquiries where not bought on or made by me. I contacted The Credit Company who conducted the inquiry and asked them to remove their credit inquiry from my credit report. I request that you investigate the inquiry on my credit report to determine who authorized the inquiry. If you find my allegation to be true once your investigation is complete, please remove the inquiry and send me an updated copy of my credit report at the address listed above XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX VA, XXXX. If you find the inquiry referenced above to be valid, please send me a description of the procedures used in your investigation within 15 business days of completing the investigation. 
Thank you for your assistance in this matter,

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2019-02-12
Company: CITIBANK, N.A.
State: CA
Product: Credit card or prepaid card
Sub-product: General-purpose credit card or charge card
Issue: Other features, terms, or problems
Sub-issue: Problem with rewards from credit card

Complaint:
My Citi Bank Visa ( XXXX XXXX ) has a " price rewind '' feature that if I find a lower price within 60 days of the date of purchase, they will credit me the difference. In XXXX of 2018, Citi changed the rules so that items from an " internet auction site '' are no longer eligible.

Here is a link to what is and what isn't covered : https : //www.citipricerewind.comXXXX I recently filed two 'price rewinds ' for some electronic items. A computer monitor that was {$70.00} cheaper than what I originally paid for it and a computer video card that was {$100.00} cheaper. I later found these items on sale at the XXXX XXXX XXXX  : http : XXXX XXXX is a pretty well known for selling computer parts but I believe that they have also opened this 'store ' on XXXX to gain further market share and exposure because they now they sell much more than just computer parts. 

Now I can understand Citi not wanting to 'price match ' and XXXX auction, but an XXXX  XXXX is not an auction - it is a sales platform. Brand new items, with warranties, return policy, etc are sold at a fixed price. In the instance of the computer monitor I filed a Price Rewind about, XXXX sold over 250 of them ( at  {$800.00} each ) through their XXXX XXXX. I view an XXXX XXXX as the same thing as a small vendor selling something through another well-known sales platform - XXXX I don't think it is right that Citi automatically disallows any purchases from an " XXXX XXXX '' and automatically label it as an 'auction site '. I think they are abusing that policy to avoid paying out on claims

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Consumer complaint received 2022-12-20
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NJ
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Improper use of your report
Sub-issue: Reporting company used your report improperly

Complaint:
I Sent my letter off on XX/XX/2022. I told the credit bureaus to " investigate every piece of information '' on the accounts I have listed below. I have also attached the letter I sent out and here is the Tracking #. 
XXXX and XXXX. 

According to the FRCA The term " investigative consumer report means a consumer report or portion thereof in which information on a consumer 's character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living is obtained through personal interviews with neighbors, friends, or associates of the consumer reported on or with others with whom he is acquainted or who may have knowledge concerning any such items of information. 

They stated my account were verified but how is that possible if they did not do a proper investigation according to the law. Also every piece of information on these accounts are still not reporting 100 % Accurate. And according to the FRCA 15 USC 1681 everything has to be 100 % Accurate. 

I have attached the updated credit reports still with inaccuracies across the bureaus after these items were verified according to the law. 

Accounts : Account Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX XXXX  Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX XXXX  Account Number : XXXX Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX XXXX  XXXX  Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX XXXX  Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX  Account Number : XXXX Account Name : XXXX  Account Number : XXXX

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2018-11-13
Company: EQUIFAX, INC.
State: NY
Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports
Sub-product: Credit reporting
Issue: Problem with a credit reporting company's investigation into an existing problem
Sub-issue: Their investigation did not fix an error on your report

Complaint:
I need to file a complaint against XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, New York XXXX. The reporting on what was once a combined commercial/residential wrap around mortgage is now just attached to my personal residence after I sold off the commercial property attached to the collateralized loan. Shortly after I sold the commercial portion, I was hit with an acceleration of my mortgage after XXXX XXXX acquired the mortgage from a bank merger. This was extremely unfair at the time due to the personal hardship I was going through with the passing of my wife, who was also an XXXX and a partner in my XXXX XXXX. Then XXXX XXXX started what was proven to be an illegal foreclosure action. Since the commercial aspects of the mortgage was eliminated with the sale of the larger portioned commercial percentage, my rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices was protected under the XX/XX/2018 addendum of that federal law, My rights were violated by XXXX XXXX as I should have been given the initial right to modify the terms of the loan and take out the balloon payment, normally associated with large scale commercial transactions. After the foreclosure was filed I filed a counterclaim. XXXX XXXX XXXX was trying to ingratiate themselves foreclosing on a {$400000.00} home with only a {$140000.00} balance. I discovered that my rights were being violated under federal guidelines with both the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Eventually, XXXX XXXX XXXX realized their mistake and gave me a restructured mortgage with all past payments, interest, penalties and legal fees waived, and gave to me a six-year mortgage completely interest free as long as I dropped my lawsuit against them with the Supreme Court state of New York. In essence, the current reporting is a complete falsehood, as it was XXXX XXXX XXXX that brought about the illegal foreclosure action. I should have a new payment history starting from the month of the restructured mortgage. This abusive reporting on all credit bureaus is a direct violation XXXX XXXX XXXX has with their subscriber agreement with all three national credit bureaus. The negative reporting must be deleted and only the payment history that started with the interest free mortgage should be posted. Accordingly, XXXX XXXX XXXX has only one option, to rectify this immediately and live up to their subscriber agreement with all three credit bureaus.

Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation
Consumer complaint received 2023-07-28
Company: BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
State: GA
Product: Mortgage
Sub-product: Conventional home mortgage
Issue: Struggling to pay mortgage

Complaint:
BANK OF AMERICA IS ATTEMPTING TO FORECLOSE ON MY HOME WITH A DEED THAT FROM NATIONSBANC MORTGAGE CORP ON IT THERE IS NO ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFERS TO BANK OF AMERICA NA. I HAVE MAILED 2 DIFFERENT QWR AND BOA HAS YET TO RESPOND TO EITHER. I HAVE ASKED FOR THE GAP ACCOUNTING AND SUBMITTED.A DEBT VALIDATION LETTER.BUT HAVE RECEIVED ANYTHING. 
BANK OF AMERICA WAS IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING ON A MODIFICATION WITH ME BUT THE WERE STILL MOVING FORWARD WITH FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS SIMULTANEOUSLY THIS IS CLEARLY DUAL TRACKING. 


COPY OF THE 2ND QWR IS ATTACHED

Company public response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Company response to consumer: Closed with explanation