B1tta/Drug-ACE huggingface dataset:
[Title]: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: The most suitable antihypertensive drug to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension and diabetes is unclear. In prespecified analyses, we compared the effects of losartan and atenolol on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. METHODS: As part of the LIFE study, in a double-masked, randomised, parallel-group trial, we assigned a group of 1195 patients with diabetes, hypertension, and signs of left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on electrocardiograms losartan-based or atenolol-based treatment. Mean age of patients was 67 years (SD 7) and mean blood pressure 177/96 mm Hg (14/10) after placebo run-in. We followed up patients for at least 4 years (mean 4.7 years [1.1]). We used Cox regression analysis with baseline Framingham risk score and electrocardiogram-LVH as covariates to compare the effects of the drugs on the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction). FINDINGS: Mean blood pressure fell to 146/79 mm Hg (17/11) in losartan patients and 148/79 mm Hg (19/11) in atenolol patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 103 patients assigned losartan (n=586) and 139 assigned atenolol (n=609); relative risk 0.76 (95% CI 0.58-.98), p=0.031. 38 and 61 patients in the losartan and atenolol groups, respectively, died from cardiovascular disease; 0.63 (0.42-0.95), p=0.028. Mortality from all causes was 63 and 104 in losartan and atenolol groups, respectively; 0.61 (0.45-0.84), p=0.002. INTERPRETATION: Losartan was more effective than atenolol in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as mortality from all causes in patients with hypertension, diabetes, and LVH. Losartan seems to have benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.
[Drug-Disease]: Losartan - hypertension
[Title]: Efficacy of phenytoin against hyponatremic seizures due to SIADH after administration of anticancer drugs in a neonate.
[Abstract]: A neonate with the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) developed refractory hyponatremic seizures following administration of anticancer drugs. The seizures did not respond to diazepam, phenobarbital, or lidocaine, but resolved immediately with administration of phenytoin. The low water-excretion capacity in neonates should be taken into consideration when fluid loading is attempted, to avoid renal damage upon administration of drugs such as cisplatin that have a potential damaging effect on the kidney. Phenytoin could be the therapy of choice for SIADH and resulting seizures in the neonatal period.
[Drug-Disease]: Phenytoin - SIADH
[Title]: Efficacy of phenytoin against hyponatremic seizures due to SIADH after administration of anticancer drugs in a neonate.
[Abstract]: A neonate with the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) developed refractory hyponatremic seizures following administration of anticancer drugs. The seizures did not respond to diazepam, phenobarbital, or lidocaine, but resolved immediately with administration of phenytoin. The low water-excretion capacity in neonates should be taken into consideration when fluid loading is attempted, to avoid renal damage upon administration of drugs such as cisplatin that have a potential damaging effect on the kidney. Phenytoin could be the therapy of choice for SIADH and resulting seizures in the neonatal period.
[Drug-Disease]: Phenytoin - seizures
[Title]: [Possibilities and limits of treatment of aggressive behavior in patients with mental retardation with risperidone].
[Abstract]: Despite definite indication for psychopharmacologic intervention, severe and persistent symptoms of aggressive and self-injurious behaviour still remain a therapeutic challenge. As recent research has demonstrated, not only the dopaminergic and serotonergic but also the endogenous opiate system plays a role in the pathogenesis of self-injurious behaviour. Nevertheless, the efficacy of classical neuroleptics as well as opiate antagonists is questioned. In open and controlled studies, the administration of the atypical neuroleptic risperidone (a serotonin 2A-dopamine D2 antagonist) was associated with a long-term effect in reducing self-injuries. In our clinical trial, 20 mentally retarded adults presenting with severe self-injurious and aggressive behaviour were administered risperidone over a follow-up period of 35 months. Clinical efficacy was measured with the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS), conducted in a home for people with mental retardation. In 17 patients, a significant reduction in self-injurious behaviour is shown. Besides, there was a significant overall clinical improvement in behaviour.
[Drug-Disease]: risperidone - aggressive behavior
[Title]: [Effects of carvedilol on the hemodynamics and its tolerance in elderly patients].
[Abstract]: Clinical trials have shown that beta-blockers can produce symptomatic improvement and decrease the risk of death in chronic heart failure patients. However, the side effects of beta-blockers including worsening heart failure, AV-block, contracting peripheral vessels and unfavorable effects on glucose and cholesterol metabolism tend to make physicians hesitate to prescribe beta-blockers for elderly patients. Carvedilol is a novel non-selective beta-blocker without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) and has vasodilating effect through blocking alpha 1 receptor. We examined the effects of carvedilol on cardiac parameters in order to clarify whether beta-blocker may affect left ventricular function in elderly Japanese patients with hypertension, angina pectoris, or both. We examined the hemodynamic effect of carvedilol in 16 patients with hypertension, angina patients or both, aged 65 and over (75.5 +/- 5.6 y.o.). After 12 weeks treatment with 10-20 mg daily oral administration, echocardiography was performed and hemodynamic parameters were calculated to evaluate their cardiac functions. Blood pressure was significantly decreased, especially in systolic pressure (163.8/87.6 +/- 15.6/11.2 mmHg to 141.6/76.9 +/- 16.6/11.7 mmHg, p &lt; 0.001/p &lt; 0.01, respectively). Ejection fraction increase (65.8 +/- 11.8% to 71.2 +/- 11.4%, p &lt; 0.05) accompanied heart rate decrease (72.0 +/- 16.1 bpm to 63.9 +/- 11.4 bpm, p &lt; 0.05). Carvedilol increased ejection fraction and decreased blood pressure safely in elderly patients with hypertension, angina pectoris, or both. Taking the condition of each patient into consideration, alpha-beta-blocker can be beneficial in elder patients.
[Drug-Disease]: Carvedilol - hypertension
[Title]: Pemetrexed combination therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
[Abstract]: Until recently, the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited to the cisplatin combinations, including a small number of cytotoxic drugs. More recently, combinations with taxanes and gemcitabine have slightly improved outcome. However, when the literature is revisited, it can be realized that older drugs such as nitrogen mustard have some degree of activity in NSCLC, traditionally considered a chemoresistant tumor. However, drugs that are mostly ineffective when used as single agents, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have significant activity when combined with cisplatin in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. 5-FU constitutes the backbone of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients. 5-FU is equally interesting because it permits investigation of thymidylate synthase (TS) levels as a genetic target for predicting response and survival. The assessment of TS levels and ERCC1 as a marker of cisplatin resistance is leading to customized chemotherapy. The possibility of discriminating cisplatin resistance is particularly attractive in choosing between cisplatin and non-cisplatin combinations in the treatment of NSCLC. We have reviewed phase I and II studies of pemetrexed in NSCLC. The response rate is approximately 20% with single-agent pemetrexed and approximately 40% in combination with cisplatin. This combination has mild to moderate toxicity. Other synergistic combinations that should be explored include pemetrexed with gemcitabine, CPT-11, docetaxel, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin. In the future, pharmacogenomically oriented chemotherapy trials should be undertaken based on the accumulated evidence that several genetic markers, such as ERCC1, beta-tubulin mutations, and loss of heterozygosity in the region of the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase, can predict resistance to cisplatin, taxanes, or gemcitabine, respectively. Mechanisms of resistance to pemetrexed need to be investigated, including the potential role of TS messenger RNA. In summary, pemetrexed has emerged as a promising new cytotoxic drug in the arsenal of chemotherapy treatments for NSCLC.
[Drug-Disease]: pemetrexed - NSCLC
[Title]: Pemetrexed combination therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
[Abstract]: Until recently, the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was limited to the cisplatin combinations, including a small number of cytotoxic drugs. More recently, combinations with taxanes and gemcitabine have slightly improved outcome. However, when the literature is revisited, it can be realized that older drugs such as nitrogen mustard have some degree of activity in NSCLC, traditionally considered a chemoresistant tumor. However, drugs that are mostly ineffective when used as single agents, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have significant activity when combined with cisplatin in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. 5-FU constitutes the backbone of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients. 5-FU is equally interesting because it permits investigation of thymidylate synthase (TS) levels as a genetic target for predicting response and survival. The assessment of TS levels and ERCC1 as a marker of cisplatin resistance is leading to customized chemotherapy. The possibility of discriminating cisplatin resistance is particularly attractive in choosing between cisplatin and non-cisplatin combinations in the treatment of NSCLC. We have reviewed phase I and II studies of pemetrexed in NSCLC. The response rate is approximately 20% with single-agent pemetrexed and approximately 40% in combination with cisplatin. This combination has mild to moderate toxicity. Other synergistic combinations that should be explored include pemetrexed with gemcitabine, CPT-11, docetaxel, carboplatin, or oxaliplatin. In the future, pharmacogenomically oriented chemotherapy trials should be undertaken based on the accumulated evidence that several genetic markers, such as ERCC1, beta-tubulin mutations, and loss of heterozygosity in the region of the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase, can predict resistance to cisplatin, taxanes, or gemcitabine, respectively. Mechanisms of resistance to pemetrexed need to be investigated, including the potential role of TS messenger RNA. In summary, pemetrexed has emerged as a promising new cytotoxic drug in the arsenal of chemotherapy treatments for NSCLC.
[Drug-Disease]: cisplatin - NSCLC
[Title]: Epinephrine treatment of hypotension in very low birthweight infants.
[Abstract]: UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of a continuous infusion of epinephrine (adrenaline) on mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), heart rate, urine output and base deficit in very low birthweight infants (VLBWI) with systemic hypotension. In VLBWI who received an infusion of epinephrine for at least 12 h the mean urine output, administered fluid volume, base deficit and administered buffer 12 h before and 12 h during the infusion were recorded. If the infusion was shorter, but given for at least 2 h, the mean heart rate and MABP 2 h before and 2 h during the infusion were recorded. Thirty-one infants with a gestational age of 26 (23-30) wk [median (minimum-maximum)] and birthweight 690 (390-1310) g were included in this retrospective chart review. The patients received an infusion of epinephrine at a postnatal age of 3 (1-21) d. The doses ranged between 0.05 and 2.6 microg kg(-1) per minute within the first 24 h of administration. Three of 31 infants received epinephrine on 2 different occasions. The MABP [+7 (-1 to 13) mmHg, p=0.000001] and the heart rate [+10 (-10 to 42) bpm, p=0.000036] increased significantly (n = 34), whereas total volume administration and urine output remained the same between the 2 periods (Wilcoxon matched pairs test). The base deficit increased significantly [-3 (-10.2 to 2.6), p = 0.0014, n = 19] without a change in the administration of buffer. CONCLUSION: The infusion of epinephrine increased the MABP and the heart rate without decreasing urine output in VLBWI with hypotension not responding to a dopamine infusion up to 15 microg kg(-1) per minute. A potential adverse effect was an increase in metabolic acidosis.
[Drug-Disease]: epinephrine - hypotension
[Title]: Adverse and beneficial secondary effects of mass treatment with azithromycin to eliminate blindness due to trachoma in Nepal.
[Abstract]: Mass administration of azithromycin to eliminate blindness due to trachoma has raised concerns regarding the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. During 2000, we compared the antimicrobial resistance of nasopharyngeal pneumococcal isolates recovered from and the prevalence of impetigo, respiratory symptoms, and diarrhea among 458 children in Nepal before and after mass administration of azithromycin. No azithromycin-resistant pneumococci were isolated except from 4.3% of children who had received azithromycin during 2 previous mass treatments (P&lt;.001). There were decreases in the prevalence of impetigo (from 14% to 6% of subjects; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.80) and diarrhea (from 32% to 11%; adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.43) 10 days after azithromycin treatment. The absence of macrolide-resistant isolates after 1 mass treatment with azithromycin is encouraging, although the recovery of azithromycin-resistant isolates after 2 mass treatments suggests the need for resistance monitoring when multiple rounds of antimicrobial treatment are given.
[Drug-Disease]: azithromycin - blindness
[Title]: Adverse and beneficial secondary effects of mass treatment with azithromycin to eliminate blindness due to trachoma in Nepal.
[Abstract]: Mass administration of azithromycin to eliminate blindness due to trachoma has raised concerns regarding the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. During 2000, we compared the antimicrobial resistance of nasopharyngeal pneumococcal isolates recovered from and the prevalence of impetigo, respiratory symptoms, and diarrhea among 458 children in Nepal before and after mass administration of azithromycin. No azithromycin-resistant pneumococci were isolated except from 4.3% of children who had received azithromycin during 2 previous mass treatments (P&lt;.001). There were decreases in the prevalence of impetigo (from 14% to 6% of subjects; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.80) and diarrhea (from 32% to 11%; adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.43) 10 days after azithromycin treatment. The absence of macrolide-resistant isolates after 1 mass treatment with azithromycin is encouraging, although the recovery of azithromycin-resistant isolates after 2 mass treatments suggests the need for resistance monitoring when multiple rounds of antimicrobial treatment are given.
[Drug-Disease]: azithromycin - diarrhea
[Title]: Randomized comparative study of omeprazole and famotidine in reflux esophagitis.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA) are routinely used in the treatment of reflux esophagitis (RE), no consensus has been reached yet as to whether the first-choice drug should be PPI or H2-RA. In this study, the effects of omeprazole (OMP) and famotidine (FAM) on RE have been examined in a randomized comparative study. METHODS: Protocols of OMP 20 mg once daily or FAM 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks were allocated to 56 cases with RE at random, using an envelope randomization method. Their efficacy in achieving healing was examined endoscopically and a relief from subjective symptoms was compared. RESULTS: Patient's background such as sex, age, recurrence, hiatal hernia, smoking and drinking habits, and complications, and the severity of esophagitis at the time of enrolment were not significantly different between the two groups. Healing in the OMP group and the FAM group was observed in 72 and 32% (P = 0.025) of patients at week 4 and 95 and 53% (P = 0.003) of patients at week 8, respectively. Subjective symptoms were relieved more frequently in the OMP group (at week 2, 67% compared with 29%, P = 0.005; at week 4, 95% compared with 55%, P = 0.009), but this superiority was not significant at week 8 (94% compared with 65%, P = 0.085). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole provided quicker healing and a greater relief from subjective symptoms than did FAM in the treatment of RE, and was considered more suitable as a first-choice drug.
[Drug-Disease]: Omeprazole - esophagitis
[Title]: Randomized comparative study of omeprazole and famotidine in reflux esophagitis.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA) are routinely used in the treatment of reflux esophagitis (RE), no consensus has been reached yet as to whether the first-choice drug should be PPI or H2-RA. In this study, the effects of omeprazole (OMP) and famotidine (FAM) on RE have been examined in a randomized comparative study. METHODS: Protocols of OMP 20 mg once daily or FAM 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks were allocated to 56 cases with RE at random, using an envelope randomization method. Their efficacy in achieving healing was examined endoscopically and a relief from subjective symptoms was compared. RESULTS: Patient's background such as sex, age, recurrence, hiatal hernia, smoking and drinking habits, and complications, and the severity of esophagitis at the time of enrolment were not significantly different between the two groups. Healing in the OMP group and the FAM group was observed in 72 and 32% (P = 0.025) of patients at week 4 and 95 and 53% (P = 0.003) of patients at week 8, respectively. Subjective symptoms were relieved more frequently in the OMP group (at week 2, 67% compared with 29%, P = 0.005; at week 4, 95% compared with 55%, P = 0.009), but this superiority was not significant at week 8 (94% compared with 65%, P = 0.085). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole provided quicker healing and a greater relief from subjective symptoms than did FAM in the treatment of RE, and was considered more suitable as a first-choice drug.
[Drug-Disease]: Omeprazole - reflux esophagitis
[Title]: Randomized comparative study of omeprazole and famotidine in reflux esophagitis.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA) are routinely used in the treatment of reflux esophagitis (RE), no consensus has been reached yet as to whether the first-choice drug should be PPI or H2-RA. In this study, the effects of omeprazole (OMP) and famotidine (FAM) on RE have been examined in a randomized comparative study. METHODS: Protocols of OMP 20 mg once daily or FAM 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks were allocated to 56 cases with RE at random, using an envelope randomization method. Their efficacy in achieving healing was examined endoscopically and a relief from subjective symptoms was compared. RESULTS: Patient's background such as sex, age, recurrence, hiatal hernia, smoking and drinking habits, and complications, and the severity of esophagitis at the time of enrolment were not significantly different between the two groups. Healing in the OMP group and the FAM group was observed in 72 and 32% (P = 0.025) of patients at week 4 and 95 and 53% (P = 0.003) of patients at week 8, respectively. Subjective symptoms were relieved more frequently in the OMP group (at week 2, 67% compared with 29%, P = 0.005; at week 4, 95% compared with 55%, P = 0.009), but this superiority was not significant at week 8 (94% compared with 65%, P = 0.085). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole provided quicker healing and a greater relief from subjective symptoms than did FAM in the treatment of RE, and was considered more suitable as a first-choice drug.
[Drug-Disease]: famotidine - esophagitis
[Title]: Randomized comparative study of omeprazole and famotidine in reflux esophagitis.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Although proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RA) are routinely used in the treatment of reflux esophagitis (RE), no consensus has been reached yet as to whether the first-choice drug should be PPI or H2-RA. In this study, the effects of omeprazole (OMP) and famotidine (FAM) on RE have been examined in a randomized comparative study. METHODS: Protocols of OMP 20 mg once daily or FAM 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks were allocated to 56 cases with RE at random, using an envelope randomization method. Their efficacy in achieving healing was examined endoscopically and a relief from subjective symptoms was compared. RESULTS: Patient's background such as sex, age, recurrence, hiatal hernia, smoking and drinking habits, and complications, and the severity of esophagitis at the time of enrolment were not significantly different between the two groups. Healing in the OMP group and the FAM group was observed in 72 and 32% (P = 0.025) of patients at week 4 and 95 and 53% (P = 0.003) of patients at week 8, respectively. Subjective symptoms were relieved more frequently in the OMP group (at week 2, 67% compared with 29%, P = 0.005; at week 4, 95% compared with 55%, P = 0.009), but this superiority was not significant at week 8 (94% compared with 65%, P = 0.085). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole provided quicker healing and a greater relief from subjective symptoms than did FAM in the treatment of RE, and was considered more suitable as a first-choice drug.
[Drug-Disease]: famotidine - reflux esophagitis
[Title]: Is beta-blockade useful in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation? An analysis of data from two previously completed prospective trials.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Beta-adrenergic blockade is of proven value in chronic heart failure. It is uncertain, however, if beta-blockade provides a similar degree of clinical benefit for heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) as those in sinus rhythm (SR). AIMS: To compare the effectiveness of beta blockade in patients with heart failure and AF. METHODS: Patients with chronic heart failure were randomized to treatment (double blind) with metoprolol 50 mg twice daily or carvedilol 25 mg twice daily in addition to standard therapy. Response was assessed after 12 weeks by a quality of life questionnaire, New York Heart Association class, exercise capacity (6-min walk test), radionucleotide ventriculography for LVEF, 2-D echocardiography measurement of left ventricular (LV) dimensions and diastolic filling and 24-h electrocardiograph monitoring to assess heart rate changes. RESULTS: Both beta-blockers produced significant improvements in LVEF in both the SR group: (+6+/-10% at 12-week, P&lt;0.001) and the AF group: (+11+/-9% at 12-week, P&lt;0.05). However, significant improvement in symptoms (P&lt;0.001) and exercise capacity (P&lt;0.001) were observed only in the SR group but not in the AF group despite a significant improvement in LVEF. CONCLUSION: Beta-blockers were effective in improving LV ejection fraction in chronic heart failure patients in either SR or AF but had less effect on symptoms and exercise capacity in those with AF.
[Drug-Disease]: carvedilol - heart failure