B1tta/Drug-ACE huggingface dataset:
[Title]: Effect of niacin and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia.
[Abstract]: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of atorvastatin and niacin on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-design study of patients with total cholesterol >200 mg/dl, triglycerides between 200 and 800 mg/dl, and apolipoprotein B >110 mg/dl. Patients were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 10 mg or immediate release niacin 3,000 mg daily for 12 weeks following a low-fat diet stabilization period. Lipoprotein subclasses were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Atorvastatin and niacin both significantly reduced the concentrations of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (-31% and -29%, respectively) and small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (-44% and -35%, respectively). Niacin increased the concentration of large LDL (+75%). Atrovastatin reduced the number of LDL particles more than niacin (31% vs 14%). In patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia, both drugs had important effects on lipoprotein subfractions, which contributed to a reduction in coronary heart disease risk. The drugs equally reduced VLDL subclass levels. Niacin shifted the LDL subclass distribution toward the larger particles, more effectively converted patients from LDL phenotype B to phenotype A, and increased levels of the larger and perhaps more cardioprotective high-density lipoprotein particles. In contrast, atorvastatin preferentially lowered the concentration of small LDL particles without increasing levels of large LDL, and more effectively, reduced LDL particle numbers. Atorvastatin had a preferred LDL effect, whereas niacin had a preferred high-density lipoprotein effect.
[Drug-Disease]: Atorvastatin - atherogenic dyslipidemia
[Title]: Effect of niacin and atorvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia.
[Abstract]: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of atorvastatin and niacin on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-design study of patients with total cholesterol &gt;200 mg/dl, triglycerides between 200 and 800 mg/dl, and apolipoprotein B &gt;110 mg/dl. Patients were randomly assigned to atorvastatin 10 mg or immediate release niacin 3,000 mg daily for 12 weeks following a low-fat diet stabilization period. Lipoprotein subclasses were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Atorvastatin and niacin both significantly reduced the concentrations of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (-31% and -29%, respectively) and small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (-44% and -35%, respectively). Niacin increased the concentration of large LDL (+75%). Atrovastatin reduced the number of LDL particles more than niacin (31% vs 14%). In patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia, both drugs had important effects on lipoprotein subfractions, which contributed to a reduction in coronary heart disease risk. The drugs equally reduced VLDL subclass levels. Niacin shifted the LDL subclass distribution toward the larger particles, more effectively converted patients from LDL phenotype B to phenotype A, and increased levels of the larger and perhaps more cardioprotective high-density lipoprotein particles. In contrast, atorvastatin preferentially lowered the concentration of small LDL particles without increasing levels of large LDL, and more effectively, reduced LDL particle numbers. Atorvastatin had a preferred LDL effect, whereas niacin had a preferred high-density lipoprotein effect.
[Drug-Disease]: Niacin - atherogenic dyslipidemia
[Title]: Moclobemide vs. imipramine in bipolar depression: a multicentre double-blind clinical trial.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy, tolerability and risk of precipitating mania of moclobemide and imipramine in the treatment of bipolar depression. METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study of moclobemide (MCB) (450-750 mg daily) and imipramine (IMI) (150-250 mg daily) in 21 centres in nine countries; 156 patients (65 males, 91 females) aged 18-65 with bipolar depression (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score chi16) participated. Clinical status was assessed using standardized rating scales before treatment and at 1,2,3,4,6 and 8 weeks. The data were analysed on an intention to treat basis with the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: In the MCB group, the mean HAMD fell from 23.0 to 13.1, in the IMI group it fell from 22.5 to 9.5; the mean score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) fell from 29.5 to 16.3 on MCB and from 29.2 to 11.6 on IMI. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on any efficacy measures. Anticholinergic side-effects were three times more common with IMI than MCB and weight gain was also greater on IMI. Two patients (3.7%) on MCB and six patients (11%) on IMI were withdrawn because of manic symptoms, with manic symptoms occurring earlier on IMI, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: No differences in efficacy were detected between MCB and IMI in the treatment of bipolar depression. The data suggests that MCB is less likely than IMI to precipitate mania.
[Drug-Disease]: IMI - mania
[Title]: Moclobemide vs. imipramine in bipolar depression: a multicentre double-blind clinical trial.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy, tolerability and risk of precipitating mania of moclobemide and imipramine in the treatment of bipolar depression. METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study of moclobemide (MCB) (450-750 mg daily) and imipramine (IMI) (150-250 mg daily) in 21 centres in nine countries; 156 patients (65 males, 91 females) aged 18-65 with bipolar depression (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score chi16) participated. Clinical status was assessed using standardized rating scales before treatment and at 1,2,3,4,6 and 8 weeks. The data were analysed on an intention to treat basis with the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: In the MCB group, the mean HAMD fell from 23.0 to 13.1, in the IMI group it fell from 22.5 to 9.5; the mean score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) fell from 29.5 to 16.3 on MCB and from 29.2 to 11.6 on IMI. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on any efficacy measures. Anticholinergic side-effects were three times more common with IMI than MCB and weight gain was also greater on IMI. Two patients (3.7%) on MCB and six patients (11%) on IMI were withdrawn because of manic symptoms, with manic symptoms occurring earlier on IMI, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: No differences in efficacy were detected between MCB and IMI in the treatment of bipolar depression. The data suggests that MCB is less likely than IMI to precipitate mania.
[Drug-Disease]: MCB - mania
[Title]: Clomipramine versus haloperidol in the treatment of autistic disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.
[Abstract]: Clomipramine, haloperidol, and placebo were compared with baseline in the treatment of autism, and overall outcome, specific symptoms, and side effects were examined. It was hypothesized that clomipramine would be better tolerated than haloperidol and prove superior on a measure of stereotypy. Individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of autistic disorder (mean age, 16.3 years; range, 10-36 years) were randomly assigned, by using a Latin square design, to the following 7-week trials: placebo, clomipramine (mean daily dose, 128.4 mg; range, 100-150 mg), or haloperidol (mean daily dose, 1.3 mg; range, 1-1.5 mg). Data on 36 subjects were analyzed and taken together; the results favored haloperidol. In those patients who were able to complete a full therapeutic trial, clomipramine proved comparable to haloperidol in terms of improvement compared with baseline. However, significantly fewer individuals receiving clomipramine versus haloperidol were able to complete the trial (37.5% vs. 69.7%, respectively) for reasons related to both side effects and efficacy or behavior problems. In the intent-to-treat sample, which is perhaps more clinically relevant, only haloperidol proved superior to baseline on a global measure of autistic symptom severity, as well as specific measures for irritability and hyperactivity. Clomipramine did not seem more effective on a measure of stereotypy, nor was it better tolerated.
[Drug-Disease]: Clomipramine - autistic
[Title]: Clomipramine versus haloperidol in the treatment of autistic disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.
[Abstract]: Clomipramine, haloperidol, and placebo were compared with baseline in the treatment of autism, and overall outcome, specific symptoms, and side effects were examined. It was hypothesized that clomipramine would be better tolerated than haloperidol and prove superior on a measure of stereotypy. Individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of autistic disorder (mean age, 16.3 years; range, 10-36 years) were randomly assigned, by using a Latin square design, to the following 7-week trials: placebo, clomipramine (mean daily dose, 128.4 mg; range, 100-150 mg), or haloperidol (mean daily dose, 1.3 mg; range, 1-1.5 mg). Data on 36 subjects were analyzed and taken together; the results favored haloperidol. In those patients who were able to complete a full therapeutic trial, clomipramine proved comparable to haloperidol in terms of improvement compared with baseline. However, significantly fewer individuals receiving clomipramine versus haloperidol were able to complete the trial (37.5% vs. 69.7%, respectively) for reasons related to both side effects and efficacy or behavior problems. In the intent-to-treat sample, which is perhaps more clinically relevant, only haloperidol proved superior to baseline on a global measure of autistic symptom severity, as well as specific measures for irritability and hyperactivity. Clomipramine did not seem more effective on a measure of stereotypy, nor was it better tolerated.
[Drug-Disease]: haloperidol - autistic
[Title]: Olanzapine for schizophrenia refractory to typical and atypical antipsychotics: an open-label, prospective trial.
[Abstract]: The role of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is still unresolved. This article presents an open-label, prospective, 14-week trial with olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder selected for unambiguous resistance to either clozapine or risperidone and to typical antipsychotics. Forty-three inpatients (mean age, 41.6 years; mean duration of illness, 21.7 years) were enrolled and treated after cross-titration from their previous antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10 to 40 mg daily without any concomitant antipsychotic medication. Patients were evaluated with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, and the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. The change with olanzapine treatment was associated with a PANSS total score improvement of 3.7 (SD = 15.6; not significant). There was a significant improvement for the PANSS cognitive and depression/anxiety factors, whereas the PANSS excitement factor worsened. The improvement rate was superior in patients receiving olanzapine doses higher than 20 mg. A total of 16.7% of patients reached response criteria set forth by a previous study. There was a significant decrease in extrapyramidal side effects (t = 2.04; p &lt; 0.05) and statistically significant, yet modest, weight gain. These results indicate that olanzapine is only modestly effective in these severely treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia. However, a trial with olanzapine can be recommended in these patients before moving to augmentation strategies, given the lack of proven alternatives and the observation that 16.7% of patients reached the response criteria.
[Drug-Disease]: olanzapine - schizophrenia
[Title]: [Clinical study on qiangxinling liquid extract in treating congestive heart failure].
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To find the safe and effective treatment and drugs for congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Ninety CHF patients whose heart function belong to III-IV grade were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group A was treated with Qiangxinling liquid extract (QXLLE); Group B with QXLLE plus small dose of digoxin and Group C with digoxin alone. RESULTS: The total effective rate on heart function of Group A was 86.7%, Group B 93.3% and Group C 83.3%, the effect of Group B was better than that of the other two groups (P &lt; 0.05, P &lt; 0.01). The digoxin withdrawing and reducing rate in Group B was higher than that in Group C (86.7% vs 50.0%, P &lt; 0.05). The left ventricular systolic function, including stroke volume, cardiac output, ejection fraction of the 3 groups were improved after treatment, among them the effect of Group B was the best (P &lt; 0.01). Moreover, improvement in ventricular diastolic function was shown in Group A and B, including the maximum blood flow of the late and the early diastolic stage as well as the ratio of them (P &lt; 0.05, P &lt; 0.01). The plasma renin activity, angiotensin II and atrial natriuretic peptide of Group A and B were also lowered after treatment and were significantly different to those of the Group C (P &lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: QXLLE could improve the heart function, clinical symptoms and neuro-endocrinal indexes of CHF patients and reduce the side effects of digoxin.
[Drug-Disease]: digoxin - CHF
[Title]: Cisapride plasma levels and corrected QT interval in infants undergoing routine polysomnography.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Reported QTc prolongation associated with cardiac arrhythmia in a small number of children undergoing cisapride therapy and lack of pharmacokinetic correlation provided the impetus for this prospective study. The authors evaluated the relation between cisapride plasma concentrations, the electrocardiographic QT interval, and cardiac rhythm in infants undergoing routine 8-hour polysomnography. METHODS: A total of 211 infants were enrolled: 84 (17 born prematurely) undergoing cisapride therapy for at least 4 days for suspected gastroesophageal reflux and 127 controls (10 born prematurely), aged between 1 week and 13.5 months. Infants underwent continuous bipolar limb lead I recording during routine 8-hour polysomnography. QT intervals and heart rate were measured at hourly intervals. The morning after polysomnography, 12-lead electrocardiography was performed (1 hour after cisapride administration). Cisapride plasma concentrations were determined immediately before and 1 to 2 hours after administration. Serum electrolyte concentrations were measured. RESULTS: The administered cisapride dose ranged from 0.35 to 1.55 (mean, 0.81, median 0.79) mg. kg-1. d-1. Cisapride plasma concentrations were significantly higher in infants younger than 3 months of age. Cisapride-treated infants younger than 3 months of age had longer QTc intervals compared with age-matched controls. Heart rate was similar for cisapride-treated and control infants. No arrhythmia or atrioventricular conduction abnormalities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: At comparable doses of cisapride and comparable plasma concentrations, the QTc was significantly higher in infants younger than 3 months of age. This confirms age-dependent cisapride pharmacokinetics in the first 10 to 12 weeks strongly correlated with changes in body weight and may also suggest an altered ability of infants younger than 3 months of age to metabolize cisapride. The clinical significance and risk of the increased QTc interval is unclear. Cisapride should be judiciously prescribed in infants younger than the age of 3 months and electrocardiography should be performed before and during therapy.
[Drug-Disease]: Cisapride - gastroesophageal reflux
[Title]: Efficacy and tolerability of long-term therapy using high lamivudine doses for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.
[Abstract]: PURPOSE: A long-term follow-up study was carried out to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of long-term therapy (1 to 3 years) with high doses (150 or 300 mg daily) of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were studied, including those who were seronegative for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), as well as those with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Viral DNA clearance was monitored by using end-point dilution polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a highly sensitive method. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase gene mutations associated with resistance were determined by sequencing. RESULTS: Response to lamivudine in the sixth month was observed in 19/32 (59.4%) patients. With one exception, viral DNA results observed at this time were maintained. The YMDD mutation was detected in 12 nonresponder patients (9 YVDD, 2 YIDD, and 1 mixed population Y(V/I)DD), generally associated with the L528M mutation. Re-takeover by the wild type was observed 6 to 18 months after lamivudine withdrawal. Lamivudine response rates in noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients were 9/18 (50%) and 10/14 (71.4%), respectively. HBeAg to anti-HBe seroconversion was found after different periods in all responder patients. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance and anti-HBs seroconversion were occasionally found. CONCLUSIONS: In nonresponder patients, resistant mutants appeared up to the second year of lamivudine therapy. In spite of the presence of resistant mutants, maintenance of therapy was usually associated with a lower viral load. In responder patients, maintenance of therapy was associated with continued absence of detectable HBV DNA in serum, as monitored by highly sensitive methods. No significant side effects caused by lamivudine were observed in our patients, even in those with liver cirrhosis.
[Drug-Disease]: lamivudine - chronic hepatitis B
[Title]: A double-blind comparative study of clozapine and risperidone in the management of severe chronic schizophrenia.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: This prospective, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of therapeutic doses of clozapine and risperidone in patients with severe chronic schizophrenia and poor previous treatment response. METHOD: Male or female patients aged 18-65 years who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia and study requirements for poor previous treatment response (N=273) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either clozapine or risperidone administered over 12 weeks in increasing increments. The primary efficacy measures were the magnitude of improvement in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: The magnitude of improvement in mean BPRS and CGI scores from baseline to end of the study was significantly greater in the clozapine group than in the risperidone group. Statistically significant differences in favor of clozapine were also seen for most of the secondary efficacy measures (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Calgary Depression Scale, Psychotic Depression Scale, and Psychotic Anxiety Scale). The adverse event profile was similar for both treatment groups, with a lower risk of extrapyramidal symptoms in the clozapine group. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine showed superior efficacy over risperidone in this patient population. Both treatments were equally well tolerated as demonstrated through their adverse event profiles, although as expected clozapine was associated with a lower risk of extrapyramidal symptoms than risperidone.
[Drug-Disease]: clozapine - schizophrenia
[Title]: Idazoxan, an alpha-2 antagonist, and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias in patients with Parkinson's disease.
[Abstract]: Dyskinesia is a frequent and disabling side effect in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with chronic dopa-therapy. Preclinical data in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6,-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) monkey suggest that alpha-2 antagonists may reduce dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia. We assessed, in a pilot randomised placebo-controlled study, the effects of single oral doses (10 mg, 20 mg, and 40 mg) of idazoxan, an alpha-2 antagonist, on motor parkinsonian disability and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia following an acute oral challenge of L-DOPA in 18 patients with Parkinson's disease. The severity of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia improved after 20 mg idazoxan pretreatment, while there was no concommittant deterioration in the antiparkinsonian response to L-DOPA. These results suggest that blocking alpha-2 receptors in patients with Parkinson's disease might improve L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia without the cost of a return of parkinsonian symptomatology. Further studies are required to assess whether this property could have potential therapeutic applications in the long-term management of dyskinetic patients with Parkinson's disease.
[Drug-Disease]: idazoxan - dyskinetic
[Title]: Randomized comparison of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, with unfractionated heparin adjunctive to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis and aspirin: second trial of Heparin and Aspirin Reperfusion Therapy (HART II).
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Adjunctive unfractionated heparin (UFH) during thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) promotes the speed and magnitude of coronary artery recanalization and reduces reocclusion. Low-molecular-weight heparins offer practical and potential pharmacological advantages over UFH in multiple applications but have not been systematically studied as adjuncts to fibrinolysis in AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred patients undergoing reperfusion therapy with an accelerated recombinant tissue plasminogen activator regimen and aspirin for AMI were randomly assigned to receive adjunctive therapy for at least 3 days with either enoxaparin or UFH. The study was designed to show noninferiority of enoxaparin versus UFH with regard to infarct-related artery patency. Ninety minutes after starting therapy, patency rates (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow grade 2 or 3) were 80.1% and 75.1% in the enoxaparin and UFH groups, respectively. Reocclusion at 5 to 7 days from TIMI grade 2 or 3 to TIMI 0 or 1 flow and TIMI grade 3 to TIMI 0 or 1 flow, respectively, occurred in 5.9% and 3.1% of the enoxaparin group versus 9.8% and 9.1% in the UFH group. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin was at least as effective as UFH as an adjunct to thrombolysis, with a trend toward higher recanalization rates and less reocclusion at 5 to 7 days.
[Drug-Disease]: aspirin - myocardial infarction