B1tta/Drug-ACE huggingface dataset:
[Title]: Preliminary efficacy assessment of intrathecal injection of an American formulation of adenosine in humans.
[Abstract]: BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies of intrathecal adenosine suggest it may be effective in the treatment of acute and chronic pain in humans, and preliminary studies in volunteers and patients with a Swedish formulation of adenosine suggests it may be effective in hypersensitivity states but not with acute noxious stimulation. The purpose of this study was to screen for efficacy of a different formulation of adenosine marketed in the US, using both acute noxious stimulation and capsaicin-evoked mechanical hypersensitivity. METHODS: Following Food and Drug Administration and institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 65 volunteers were studied in two trials: an open-label, dose-escalating trial with intrathecal adenosine doses of 0.25-2.0 mg and a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adenosine, 2 mg. Cerebrospinal fluid was obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis, and pain ratings in response to acute heat stimuli and areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia after intradermal capsaicin injection were determined. RESULTS: Adenosine produced no effect on pain report to acute noxious thermal or chemical stimulation but reduced mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia from intradermal capsaicin injection for at least 24 h. In contrast, residence time of adenosine in cerebrospinal fluid was short (&lt; 4 h). CONCLUSIONS: These results show selective inhibition by intrathecal adenosine of hypersensitivity, presumed to reflect central sensitization in humans after peripheral capsaicin injection. The long-lasting effect is consistent with that observed in preliminary reports of patients with chronic neuropathic pain and is not due to prolonged residence of adenosine in cerebrospinal fluid.
[Drug-Disease]: adenosine - allodynia
[Title]: Latanoprost and brimonidine: therapeutic and physiologic assessment before and after oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy.
[Abstract]: PURPOSE: To assess, before and during oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug coadministration, latanoprost's and brimonidine's hypotensive action in eyes at risk of glaucomatous progression, assessing the effect of each drug on ocular perfusion and visual function. METHODS: Twenty consenting adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent a double-masked, bilateral, randomized prospective study. Treatment started with either latanoprost 0.005% in the morning and placebo in the evening, or brimonidine 0.2% twice daily in one eye; after 1 week starting the other in the fellow eye. After another week, oral indomethacin 25 mg four times a day, commenced for 2 more weeks. Intraocular pressure, ocular circulation, and visual function were monitored pretreatment, after unilateral monotherapy (day 7), bilateral ocular therapy (day 14), and coadministered oral indomethacin (day 28). Intrasubject differences (interocular and intraocular relative to baseline) were determined by two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS: A loss of the significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine was noted after oral indomethacin coadministration (-14%; P =.004 for brimonidine alone versus -11%; P =.3 with indomethacin). Significant intraocular pressure reduction with latanoprost persisted despite indomethacin (-25%; P &lt;.0001 for latanoprost alone versus -30%; P &lt;.0001 with indomethacin). Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 40% with latanoprost, but was unchanged with brimonidine (interdrug difference, P =.004). Midperipheral retinal microcirculation increased 23% (P =.03) with latanoprost. Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained consistently at or above baseline with both latanoprost and brimonidine. Indomethacin had no significant effect on ocular perfusion or visual function measures. CONCLUSIONS: Circulatory and hydrodynamic findings differed substantially for the two drugs. The loss of significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine during indomethacin treatment may be clinically important.
[Drug-Disease]: brimonidine - ocular hypertension
[Title]: Latanoprost and brimonidine: therapeutic and physiologic assessment before and after oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy.
[Abstract]: PURPOSE: To assess, before and during oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug coadministration, latanoprost's and brimonidine's hypotensive action in eyes at risk of glaucomatous progression, assessing the effect of each drug on ocular perfusion and visual function. METHODS: Twenty consenting adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent a double-masked, bilateral, randomized prospective study. Treatment started with either latanoprost 0.005% in the morning and placebo in the evening, or brimonidine 0.2% twice daily in one eye; after 1 week starting the other in the fellow eye. After another week, oral indomethacin 25 mg four times a day, commenced for 2 more weeks. Intraocular pressure, ocular circulation, and visual function were monitored pretreatment, after unilateral monotherapy (day 7), bilateral ocular therapy (day 14), and coadministered oral indomethacin (day 28). Intrasubject differences (interocular and intraocular relative to baseline) were determined by two-tailed paired t test. RESULTS: A loss of the significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine was noted after oral indomethacin coadministration (-14%; P =.004 for brimonidine alone versus -11%; P =.3 with indomethacin). Significant intraocular pressure reduction with latanoprost persisted despite indomethacin (-25%; P &lt;.0001 for latanoprost alone versus -30%; P &lt;.0001 with indomethacin). Pulsatile ocular blood flow increased 40% with latanoprost, but was unchanged with brimonidine (interdrug difference, P =.004). Midperipheral retinal microcirculation increased 23% (P =.03) with latanoprost. Humphrey perimetry and contrast sensitivity remained consistently at or above baseline with both latanoprost and brimonidine. Indomethacin had no significant effect on ocular perfusion or visual function measures. CONCLUSIONS: Circulatory and hydrodynamic findings differed substantially for the two drugs. The loss of significance of intraocular pressure reduction with brimonidine during indomethacin treatment may be clinically important.
[Drug-Disease]: latanoprost - ocular hypertension
[Title]: [Comparison of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of intravenous versus oral propafenone in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation].
[Abstract]: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of intravenous and oral propafenone in the conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation propafenone to sinus rhythm. We analysed two groups of 100 consecutive patients (pts) treated because of propafenone with duration < 48 h. The first group was treated with intravenous PFN (bolus of 70 to 140 mg) and the second group was treated with oral PFN (300 to 600 mg). These 2 groups were comparable in age, sex, evidence of CAD, hypertension, mitral valve disease, history of hyperthyroidism and the level of K+ at admittance. Conversion to sinus rhythm was achieved in 64 (64%) pts who received i.v. propafenone and in 77 (77%) who received oral propafenone (p < 0.05). We conclude that oral and intravenous propafenone is safe in the termination of propafenone. Oral route of administration appears to be superior to intravenous because of greater efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
[Drug-Disease]: propafenone - paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
[Title]: Rapid improvement of icterus and pruritus by the oral administration of colestimide in two cases of drug-induced hepatitis.
[Abstract]: We report two cases of drug-induced hepatitis refractory to therapy of ursodeoxycholic acid and prednisolone, who were relieved of icterus and pruritus immediately by the oral administration of colestimide. Their liver dysfunction was not improved, by withdrawal of causative drugs or by treatment with prednisolone and ursodeoxycholic acid. Colestimide (3.0 g/day), a strong basic anion-exchange resin, was orally taken before breakfast and evening meal, leading to rapid and complete relief of icterus and pruritus. These cases suggested that colestimide would be useful for patients with cholestasis in drug-induced hepatitis, because this agent has few side effects and it is easy to take.
[Drug-Disease]: colestimide - cholestasis
[Title]: Rapid improvement of icterus and pruritus by the oral administration of colestimide in two cases of drug-induced hepatitis.
[Abstract]: We report two cases of drug-induced hepatitis refractory to therapy of ursodeoxycholic acid and prednisolone, who were relieved of icterus and pruritus immediately by the oral administration of colestimide. Their liver dysfunction was not improved, by withdrawal of causative drugs or by treatment with prednisolone and ursodeoxycholic acid. Colestimide (3.0 g/day), a strong basic anion-exchange resin, was orally taken before breakfast and evening meal, leading to rapid and complete relief of icterus and pruritus. These cases suggested that colestimide would be useful for patients with cholestasis in drug-induced hepatitis, because this agent has few side effects and it is easy to take.
[Drug-Disease]: colestimide - hepatitis
[Title]: [Efficacy of simultaneous bolus injection of lidocaine with propofol on pain caused by propofol injection].
[Abstract]: To investigate the effect of simultaneous bolus injection of 2% lidocaine 2 ml on preventing the pain on propofol injection, 80 patients were randomly assigned to one of four study groups; Group I received simultaneous bolus injection of 2% lidocaine 2 ml with infusion of propofol; Group II received bolus injection of saline 2 ml, 10 s before the start of infusion of propofol-lidocaine mixture; Groups III and IV received bolus injections of lidocaine and saline, separately 10 s before starting propofol infusion. Incidence of propofol-induced pain was significantly more frequent (P &lt; 0.001) in Group IV (70%) than in the other groups (20% each). Number of patients who were satisfied with this anesthetic induction and requested for the same induction method in the next anesthesia was significantly larger in the groups receiving lidocaine (P &lt; 0.05). Simultaneous bolus injection of lidocaine with propofol showed a similar clinical efficacy compared with both preadministration and premixing of lidocaine in preventing the propofol-induced pain.
[Drug-Disease]: lidocaine - pain
[Title]: Effects of theophylline withdrawal in well-controlled asthmatics treated with inhaled corticosteroid.
[Abstract]: We examined effects of theophylline withdrawal in 17 adult asthmatics whose symptoms were well controlled under a treatment of a combination of theophylline and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (iBDP). We measured daily symptoms, daily peak flow values, spirometry, peripheral blood eosinophil count (EOS), and serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) at intervals of 1-3 weeks for 3 months after theophylline withdrawal. Twelve patients experienced exacerbation of asthma (exacerbation group), whereas the remaining 5 patients exhibited no symptoms (stationary group). In the exacerbation group, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and percent vital capacity (% VC) gradually decreased until exacerbation of asthma, and the extent of these decreases within the first week after the withdrawal was greater compared with that at later than the third week. V25/HT decreased in both the exacerbation and stationary groups. In particular, the extent of the velocity of expiratory flow at 25% of the vital capacity/height (V25/HT) decrease in the exacerbation group was much greater than that of FEV1 or % VC in this group. Neither EOS nor sECP changed significantly during the clinical course in any patient. The rapid decrease in FEV1 and % VC after the withdrawal suggests that under treatment with iBDP, theophylline causes direct bronchodilating effects on smooth muscle, rather than anti-inflammatory effects. These results also suggest the importance of theophylline on peripheral as well as central airways.
[Drug-Disease]: beclomethasone dipropionate - asthma
[Title]: Effects of theophylline withdrawal in well-controlled asthmatics treated with inhaled corticosteroid.
[Abstract]: We examined effects of theophylline withdrawal in 17 adult asthmatics whose symptoms were well controlled under a treatment of a combination of theophylline and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (iBDP). We measured daily symptoms, daily peak flow values, spirometry, peripheral blood eosinophil count (EOS), and serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) at intervals of 1-3 weeks for 3 months after theophylline withdrawal. Twelve patients experienced exacerbation of asthma (exacerbation group), whereas the remaining 5 patients exhibited no symptoms (stationary group). In the exacerbation group, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and percent vital capacity (% VC) gradually decreased until exacerbation of asthma, and the extent of these decreases within the first week after the withdrawal was greater compared with that at later than the third week. V25/HT decreased in both the exacerbation and stationary groups. In particular, the extent of the velocity of expiratory flow at 25% of the vital capacity/height (V25/HT) decrease in the exacerbation group was much greater than that of FEV1 or % VC in this group. Neither EOS nor sECP changed significantly during the clinical course in any patient. The rapid decrease in FEV1 and % VC after the withdrawal suggests that under treatment with iBDP, theophylline causes direct bronchodilating effects on smooth muscle, rather than anti-inflammatory effects. These results also suggest the importance of theophylline on peripheral as well as central airways.
[Drug-Disease]: theophylline - asthma
[Title]: Effects of clofibrate in primary biliary cirrhosis hypercholesterolemia and gallstones.
[Abstract]: A patient with primary biliary cirrhosis is reported in whom the administration of clofibrate in a dose of 1 g per day for 2 months resulted in a marked increase in hypercholesterolemia, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed multiple intrahepatic gallstones. The stones disappeared 3 months after stopping clofibrate and starting chenodeoxycholic acid in a dose of 125 mg daily. These observations are discussed in relation to the known effects of clofibrate on bile composition.
[Drug-Disease]: chenodeoxycholic acid - intrahepatic gallstones
[Title]: Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: a retrospective study of enoxaparin safety in 624 pregnancies.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To assess the maternal, fetal and neonatal safety of enoxaparin in pregnant women who require antithrombotic therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of case notes of women who received enoxaparin during pregnancy, irrespective of dose, duration and reason for treatment. SETTING: Fifty-five French perinatal centres. SAMPLE: Data from 624 pregnancies in 604 women between 1988 and 1997. The incidence of previous thromboembolism was 29.8%, known thrombophilia 15.2%. METHODS: Indication, regimen of enoxaparin and outcome measures were reported for each pregnancy. Information was obtained from case records, validated by research staff and analysed by an independent scientific committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, seriousness and causality of maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events, pregnancy outcome, and incidence of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Enoxaparin was administered for treatment of an acute episode in 49 cases and for thromboprophylaxis in 574 cases. Serious maternal haemorrhage occurred in 11 cases during pregnancy (1.8%), one being reasonably related to enoxaparin, and in nine cases at delivery (1.4%), all unrelated to enoxaparin. Maternal thrombocytopenia was reported in 10 cases (1.6%). two being serious but unrelated to enoxaparin. Eight pregnancies ended in stillbirth (1.1%). Among the 693 live births, 17 major congenital abnormalities (2.5%) and 10 serious neonatal haemorrhages (1.4%) were reported. None of the fetal or neonatal adverse events was related to enoxaparin. Eight venous thromboembolic events (1.3%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of adverse events reported could be explained by the high risk profile of the study population. Overall, this retrospective study suggests enoxaparin is well tolerated during pregnancy.
[Drug-Disease]: enoxaparin - thromboembolism
[Title]: Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy: a retrospective study of enoxaparin safety in 624 pregnancies.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To assess the maternal, fetal and neonatal safety of enoxaparin in pregnant women who require antithrombotic therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of case notes of women who received enoxaparin during pregnancy, irrespective of dose, duration and reason for treatment. SETTING: Fifty-five French perinatal centres. SAMPLE: Data from 624 pregnancies in 604 women between 1988 and 1997. The incidence of previous thromboembolism was 29.8%, known thrombophilia 15.2%. METHODS: Indication, regimen of enoxaparin and outcome measures were reported for each pregnancy. Information was obtained from case records, validated by research staff and analysed by an independent scientific committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, seriousness and causality of maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events, pregnancy outcome, and incidence of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Enoxaparin was administered for treatment of an acute episode in 49 cases and for thromboprophylaxis in 574 cases. Serious maternal haemorrhage occurred in 11 cases during pregnancy (1.8%), one being reasonably related to enoxaparin, and in nine cases at delivery (1.4%), all unrelated to enoxaparin. Maternal thrombocytopenia was reported in 10 cases (1.6%). two being serious but unrelated to enoxaparin. Eight pregnancies ended in stillbirth (1.1%). Among the 693 live births, 17 major congenital abnormalities (2.5%) and 10 serious neonatal haemorrhages (1.4%) were reported. None of the fetal or neonatal adverse events was related to enoxaparin. Eight venous thromboembolic events (1.3%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of adverse events reported could be explained by the high risk profile of the study population. Overall, this retrospective study suggests enoxaparin is well tolerated during pregnancy.
[Drug-Disease]: enoxaparin - thrombophilia
[Title]: The efficacy and safety of risperidone for the treatment of geriatric psychosis.
[Abstract]: Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic drug which has been suggested to be beneficial for the treatment of elderly patients with psychotic symptoms. In this study, we assessed the short-term efficacy and the safety of risperidone in geropsychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms. The sample population included 110 elderly inpatients with psychotic disorders. Assessment for drug efficacy using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Sandoz Clinical Assessment-Geriatric scale, and Clinical Global Impression scale was conducted at baseline and also at 4 weeks subsequent to risperidone treatment commencement. Subsequent to commencing risperidone treatment, 80 patients completed a 4-week therapeutic evaluation. Seventy (87.5%) of the 80 patients experienced mild to substantial improvement using the Clinical Global Impression scale. Adverse effects were monitored in all 110 patients. The most commonly detected adverse effects were weakness of legs or walking problems (43/110; 39.1%) and dizziness (32/110; 29.1%). Peripheral edema was noted in 18 (16.4%) patients. Risperidone, in low doses, appeared to have been effective in this sample of patients older than 65 years with psychotic symptoms. The mean dose (2.1 +/- SD 1.4 mg/day) applied was lower then that suggested for young patients and was related to the each specific patient diagnosis. Peripheral edema and walking problems were commonly observed adverse effects for these elderly patients, such problems having not been seen to the same extent in previous studies of young patients.
[Drug-Disease]: Risperidone - psychotic disorders
[Title]: Developmental aspects of psychostimulant treatment in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between age and short-term clinical response to psychostimulant treatment in youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to examine whether weight-corrected doses of optimized psychostimulant therapy varied as a function of patient age. METHOD: One hundred seventy-seven patients were treated with either methylphenidate (MPH) or Adderall (ADL). Sixty-six youths received ADL and 111 patients were treated with MPH. All youths were evaluated at baseline and after receiving a week of treatment at each blinded, randomized dose level (placebo, 5, 10, or 15 mg). A "best dose" for each patient was assigned before the medication blind was broken. Behavioral ratings by both teachers and parents were examined for dose and medication effects. RESULTS: The medications had similar efficacy in children and teenagers. Older youths, however, benefited from a smaller weight-adjusted dose of medication than did the younger children. Similar efficacy was observed between the medications. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that psychostimulants are equally effective in treating children and adolescents with ADHD. Adolescents with ADHD may not necessarily require more medication than younger children to achieve a similar therapeutic response.
[Drug-Disease]: ADL - ADHD
[Title]: Developmental aspects of psychostimulant treatment in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between age and short-term clinical response to psychostimulant treatment in youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to examine whether weight-corrected doses of optimized psychostimulant therapy varied as a function of patient age. METHOD: One hundred seventy-seven patients were treated with either methylphenidate (MPH) or Adderall (ADL). Sixty-six youths received ADL and 111 patients were treated with MPH. All youths were evaluated at baseline and after receiving a week of treatment at each blinded, randomized dose level (placebo, 5, 10, or 15 mg). A "best dose" for each patient was assigned before the medication blind was broken. Behavioral ratings by both teachers and parents were examined for dose and medication effects. RESULTS: The medications had similar efficacy in children and teenagers. Older youths, however, benefited from a smaller weight-adjusted dose of medication than did the younger children. Similar efficacy was observed between the medications. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that psychostimulants are equally effective in treating children and adolescents with ADHD. Adolescents with ADHD may not necessarily require more medication than younger children to achieve a similar therapeutic response.
[Drug-Disease]: methylphenidate - ADHD