B1tta/Drug-ACE huggingface dataset:
[Title]: Phase I study of a weekly schedule of oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin, and infusional fluorouracil in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
[Abstract]: PURPOSE: To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) given on a weekly schedule including fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), to define the toxicity profile of this regimen and to find preliminary evidence of its activity in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with progressive disease, treated with fluoropyrimidines and with histologically measurable MCRC entered into this phase I study. Fixed doses of LV (500 mg/m2) followed by a 48-hour 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 infusion (5-FU48h) were administered with escalating doses of L-OHP, starting from 60 mg/m2 and with stepwise increments of 5 mg/m2. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Treatment was given once a week for four consecutive weeks, followed by a one-week rest period. RESULTS: Three dose levels were tested. The MTD was L-OHP 70 mg/m2 since two of the three patients showed dose-limiting diarrhea and the third developed neutropenia during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Most patients complained of mild peripheral sensitive neurotoxicity, which was related to the cumulative dose of L-OHP. Treatment delays were necessary for a total of 42 cases, but only in II of 42 after the pre-arranged 10% dose reduction of 5-FU (2300 mg/m2). Sixteen patients were evaluable for response: seven (33%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.6%-57.0%) were considered to show a major response (one complete), six showed a stable disease, and in addition progressive disease was observed in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that L-OHP, LV and 5-FU can be administered safely and repetitively using a weekly schedule. Diarrhea and neutropenia are the DLT of this regimen. Its activity and its manageable toxicity profile deserve further evaluation in chemotherapy-naive MCRC patients. The doses recommended for phase II trials are: L-OHP 65 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU48h 2300 mg/m2 infusion given on a weekly-times-four schedule followed by a one-week rest period.
[Drug-Disease]: 5-FU - colorectal cancer
[Title]: Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
[Abstract]: The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost, a member of a new class of pharmacological agents called prostamides, were compared with the efficacy and safety of timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Pooled 6-month results from two ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, clinical trials were analyzed. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% once a day ([QD] n = 474), bimatoprost 0.03% twice a day ([BID] n = 483), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 241). Scheduled visits were at prestudy, baseline, week 2, week 6, month 3, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was in diurnal intraocular pressure ([IOP] 8 AM, 10 AM, 4 PM, 8 PM). Bimatoprost QD provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than timolol at every time of the day and at each study visit (p &lt;/=.05). BID dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions than timolol at most timepoints, but was not as effective as QD dosing. The IOP lowering provided by bimatoprost QD was sustained for 6 months. At month 6, the mean IOP reduction from baseline at 10 AM was 8.1 mm Hg (33%) with bimatoprost QD, 6.3 mm Hg (26%) with bimatoprost BID, and 5.6 mm Hg (23%) with timolol. Low target pressures were achieved by a significantly higher percentage of patients in the bimatoprost QD group than in the timolol group. At 10 AM (peak timolol effect) at month 6, IOP &lt;/= 17 mm Hg was achieved by 63.9% of bimatoprost QD patients, compared with 37.3% of timolol patients (p &lt;.001). Bimatoprost was safe and well-tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. The most frequent side effect was trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia. Changes in iris pigmentation were reported in 1.1% of bimatoprost patients. There were no other significant findings in slit lamp examinations, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity, or visual fields, and systemic safety parameters were also unaffected. Together these results indicate that bimatoprost QD is statistically and clinically superior to timolol in lowering IOP, and is safe and well-tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
[Drug-Disease]: bimatoprost - glaucoma
[Title]: Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
[Abstract]: The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost, a member of a new class of pharmacological agents called prostamides, were compared with the efficacy and safety of timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Pooled 6-month results from two ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, clinical trials were analyzed. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% once a day ([QD] n = 474), bimatoprost 0.03% twice a day ([BID] n = 483), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 241). Scheduled visits were at prestudy, baseline, week 2, week 6, month 3, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was in diurnal intraocular pressure ([IOP] 8 AM, 10 AM, 4 PM, 8 PM). Bimatoprost QD provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than timolol at every time of the day and at each study visit (p &lt;/=.05). BID dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions than timolol at most timepoints, but was not as effective as QD dosing. The IOP lowering provided by bimatoprost QD was sustained for 6 months. At month 6, the mean IOP reduction from baseline at 10 AM was 8.1 mm Hg (33%) with bimatoprost QD, 6.3 mm Hg (26%) with bimatoprost BID, and 5.6 mm Hg (23%) with timolol. Low target pressures were achieved by a significantly higher percentage of patients in the bimatoprost QD group than in the timolol group. At 10 AM (peak timolol effect) at month 6, IOP &lt;/= 17 mm Hg was achieved by 63.9% of bimatoprost QD patients, compared with 37.3% of timolol patients (p &lt;.001). Bimatoprost was safe and well-tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. The most frequent side effect was trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia. Changes in iris pigmentation were reported in 1.1% of bimatoprost patients. There were no other significant findings in slit lamp examinations, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity, or visual fields, and systemic safety parameters were also unaffected. Together these results indicate that bimatoprost QD is statistically and clinically superior to timolol in lowering IOP, and is safe and well-tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
[Drug-Disease]: bimatoprost - ocular hypertension
[Title]: Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
[Abstract]: The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost, a member of a new class of pharmacological agents called prostamides, were compared with the efficacy and safety of timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Pooled 6-month results from two ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, clinical trials were analyzed. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% once a day ([QD] n = 474), bimatoprost 0.03% twice a day ([BID] n = 483), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 241). Scheduled visits were at prestudy, baseline, week 2, week 6, month 3, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was in diurnal intraocular pressure ([IOP] 8 AM, 10 AM, 4 PM, 8 PM). Bimatoprost QD provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than timolol at every time of the day and at each study visit (p &lt;/=.05). BID dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions than timolol at most timepoints, but was not as effective as QD dosing. The IOP lowering provided by bimatoprost QD was sustained for 6 months. At month 6, the mean IOP reduction from baseline at 10 AM was 8.1 mm Hg (33%) with bimatoprost QD, 6.3 mm Hg (26%) with bimatoprost BID, and 5.6 mm Hg (23%) with timolol. Low target pressures were achieved by a significantly higher percentage of patients in the bimatoprost QD group than in the timolol group. At 10 AM (peak timolol effect) at month 6, IOP &lt;/= 17 mm Hg was achieved by 63.9% of bimatoprost QD patients, compared with 37.3% of timolol patients (p &lt;.001). Bimatoprost was safe and well-tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. The most frequent side effect was trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia. Changes in iris pigmentation were reported in 1.1% of bimatoprost patients. There were no other significant findings in slit lamp examinations, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity, or visual fields, and systemic safety parameters were also unaffected. Together these results indicate that bimatoprost QD is statistically and clinically superior to timolol in lowering IOP, and is safe and well-tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
[Drug-Disease]: timolol - glaucoma
[Title]: Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
[Abstract]: The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost, a member of a new class of pharmacological agents called prostamides, were compared with the efficacy and safety of timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Pooled 6-month results from two ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, clinical trials were analyzed. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to treatment with bimatoprost 0.03% once a day ([QD] n = 474), bimatoprost 0.03% twice a day ([BID] n = 483), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 241). Scheduled visits were at prestudy, baseline, week 2, week 6, month 3, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was in diurnal intraocular pressure ([IOP] 8 AM, 10 AM, 4 PM, 8 PM). Bimatoprost QD provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions from baseline than timolol at every time of the day and at each study visit (p &lt;/=.05). BID dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions than timolol at most timepoints, but was not as effective as QD dosing. The IOP lowering provided by bimatoprost QD was sustained for 6 months. At month 6, the mean IOP reduction from baseline at 10 AM was 8.1 mm Hg (33%) with bimatoprost QD, 6.3 mm Hg (26%) with bimatoprost BID, and 5.6 mm Hg (23%) with timolol. Low target pressures were achieved by a significantly higher percentage of patients in the bimatoprost QD group than in the timolol group. At 10 AM (peak timolol effect) at month 6, IOP &lt;/= 17 mm Hg was achieved by 63.9% of bimatoprost QD patients, compared with 37.3% of timolol patients (p &lt;.001). Bimatoprost was safe and well-tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. The most frequent side effect was trace-to-mild conjunctival hyperemia. Changes in iris pigmentation were reported in 1.1% of bimatoprost patients. There were no other significant findings in slit lamp examinations, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity, or visual fields, and systemic safety parameters were also unaffected. Together these results indicate that bimatoprost QD is statistically and clinically superior to timolol in lowering IOP, and is safe and well-tolerated in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
[Drug-Disease]: timolol - ocular hypertension
[Title]: Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: identification of prognostic factors in a phase 2 study of 169 patients.
[Abstract]: This report of a phase 2 trial of thalidomide (THAL) (200 mg/d; 200 mg increment every 2 weeks to 800 mg) for 169 patients with advanced myeloma (MM) (abnormal cytogenetics (CG), 67%; prior autotransplant, 76%) extends earlier results in 84 patients. A 25% myeloma protein reduction was obtained in 37% of patients (50% reduction in 30% of patients; near-complete or complete remission in 14%) and was more frequent with low plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) (below 0.5%) and normal CG. Two-year event-free and overall survival rates were 20% +/- 6% and 48% +/- 6%, respectively, and these were superior with normal CG, PCLI of less than 0.5%, and beta(2)-microglobulin of 3 mg/L. Response rates were higher and survival was longer especially in high-risk patients given more than 42 g THAL in 3 months (median cumulative dose) (landmark analysis); this supports a THAL dose-response effect in advanced MM.
[Drug-Disease]: THAL - myeloma protein reduction
[Title]: Cannabinoids for control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To quantify the antiemetic efficacy and adverse effects of cannabis used for sickness induced by chemotherapy. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, bibliographies), any language, to August 2000. STUDIES: 30 randomised comparisons of cannabis with placebo or antiemetics from which dichotomous data on efficacy and harm were available (1366 patients). Oral nabilone, oral dronabinol (tetrahydrocannabinol), and intramuscular levonantradol were tested. No cannabis was smoked. Follow up lasted 24 hours. RESULTS: Cannabinoids were more effective antiemetics than prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, chlorpromazine, thiethylperazine, haloperidol, domperidone, or alizapride: relative risk 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.62), number needed to treat 6 for complete control of nausea; 1.28 (1.08 to 1.51), NNT 8 for complete control of vomiting. Cannabinoids were not more effective in patients receiving very low or very high emetogenic chemotherapy. In crossover trials, patients preferred cannabinoids for future chemotherapy cycles: 2.39 (2.05 to 2.78), NNT 3. Some potentially beneficial side effects occurred more often with cannabinoids: "high" 10.6 (6.86 to 16.5), NNT 3; sedation or drowsiness 1.66 (1.46 to 1.89), NNT 5; euphoria 12.5 (3.00 to 52.1), NNT 7. Harmful side effects also occurred more often with cannabinoids: dizziness 2.97 (2.31 to 3.83), NNT 3; dysphoria or depression 8.06 (3.38 to 19.2), NNT 8; hallucinations 6.10 (2.41 to 15.4), NNT 17; paranoia 8.58 (6.38 to 11.5), NNT 20; and arterial hypotension 2.23 (1.75 to 2.83), NNT 7. Patients given cannabinoids were more likely to withdraw due to side effects 4.67 (3.07 to 7.09), NNT 11. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, the cannabinoids tested in these trials may be useful as mood enhancing adjuvants for controlling chemotherapy related sickness. Potentially serious adverse effects, even when taken short term orally or intramuscularly, are likely to limit their widespread use.
[Drug-Disease]: cannabinoids - nausea
[Title]: Cannabinoids for control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review.
[Abstract]: OBJECTIVE: To quantify the antiemetic efficacy and adverse effects of cannabis used for sickness induced by chemotherapy. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, bibliographies), any language, to August 2000. STUDIES: 30 randomised comparisons of cannabis with placebo or antiemetics from which dichotomous data on efficacy and harm were available (1366 patients). Oral nabilone, oral dronabinol (tetrahydrocannabinol), and intramuscular levonantradol were tested. No cannabis was smoked. Follow up lasted 24 hours. RESULTS: Cannabinoids were more effective antiemetics than prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, chlorpromazine, thiethylperazine, haloperidol, domperidone, or alizapride: relative risk 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 1.62), number needed to treat 6 for complete control of nausea; 1.28 (1.08 to 1.51), NNT 8 for complete control of vomiting. Cannabinoids were not more effective in patients receiving very low or very high emetogenic chemotherapy. In crossover trials, patients preferred cannabinoids for future chemotherapy cycles: 2.39 (2.05 to 2.78), NNT 3. Some potentially beneficial side effects occurred more often with cannabinoids: "high" 10.6 (6.86 to 16.5), NNT 3; sedation or drowsiness 1.66 (1.46 to 1.89), NNT 5; euphoria 12.5 (3.00 to 52.1), NNT 7. Harmful side effects also occurred more often with cannabinoids: dizziness 2.97 (2.31 to 3.83), NNT 3; dysphoria or depression 8.06 (3.38 to 19.2), NNT 8; hallucinations 6.10 (2.41 to 15.4), NNT 17; paranoia 8.58 (6.38 to 11.5), NNT 20; and arterial hypotension 2.23 (1.75 to 2.83), NNT 7. Patients given cannabinoids were more likely to withdraw due to side effects 4.67 (3.07 to 7.09), NNT 11. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, the cannabinoids tested in these trials may be useful as mood enhancing adjuvants for controlling chemotherapy related sickness. Potentially serious adverse effects, even when taken short term orally or intramuscularly, are likely to limit their widespread use.
[Drug-Disease]: cannabinoids - vomiting
[Title]: Efficacy and safety of olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, in patients with schizophrenia: results of an open-label multicenter study in Japan.
[Abstract]: This first clinical study of olanzapine in Japanese patients with schizophrenia was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine. Eighty-one patients were included in the analysis set. Mean modal dose for those patients were 9.4 +/- 3.6 mg/day. For the primary efficacy measure (Final Global Improvement Rating score), 14.8% of patients had remarkable improvement, 59.3% of patients had moderate improvement or better, and 86.4% of patients had slight improvement or better. Results from the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale showed improvement from baseline in all clusters including positive psychotic symptoms (thought disturbance) but also against negative symptoms (anergia). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent signs and symptoms with &gt; or =10% incidence, were insomnia, weight increase, excitement, sleepiness, and anxiety. There was a low incidence of extrapyramidal treatment-emergent signs and symptoms, and events reported were tremor (6.2%), muscle rigidity (3.7%), and akathisia (2.5%). The most commonly reported treatment-emergent laboratory changes, with &gt; or = 20% of incidence, were prolactin elevations (24.3%) followed by increases in triglycerides (20.4%). However, mean prolactin values tended to be normalized during the study. This study result suggests that olanzapine is an "atypical" antipsychotic.
[Drug-Disease]: olanzapine - schizophrenia
[Title]: A multicenter study of lamivudine treatment in 33 patients with hepatitis B after liver transplantation.
[Abstract]: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) may lead to severe and rapidly progressive graft failure. Antiviral treatment may be of benefit in selected patients with recurrent hepatitis B post-LT. The aim of this prospective open-label study is to determine the safety and efficacy of lamivudine in 33 liver transplant recipients with active HBV infection. The median time from LT to study enrollment was 51 months, all patients were hepatitis B surface antigen positive, and 75% and 94% of subjects had detectable hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA at entry, respectively. The median duration of lamivudine treatment on study was 85 weeks, during which time median HBV DNA levels became undetectable by 16 weeks and 9% of patients lost previously detectable HBeAg. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels improved in most patients and normalized in 27% of patients with elevated values pretreatment. Serum bilirubin and albumin levels significantly improved in patients with abnormal values at entry (P &lt;.05). Virological breakthrough was detected in 13 subjects after a median of 61 weeks of lamivudine treatment and was confirmed to be caused by YMDD mutants in all patients tested. None of the patients with virological breakthrough showed a complete loss of clinical response to lamivudine. Serum ALT and bilirubin levels in patients with and without virological breakthrough were not significantly different at last study follow-up. Study results show that lamivudine is safe and effective in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis B. However, the high rate of virological breakthrough with prolonged therapy indicates the need for further studies of combination antiviral therapy in this patient population. Our results and others further establish the improving long-term outcomes with LT for patients with hepatitis B through advances in prevention of reinfection, as well as the availability of safe and effective antiviral therapies to treat patients with HBV recurrence.
[Drug-Disease]: lamivudine - hepatitis B
[Title]: Beneficial effects of converting liver transplant recipients from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on blood pressure, serum lipids, and weight.
[Abstract]: Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are more prevalent after liver transplantation with cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressive agent compared with tacrolimus. To determine whether blood pressure, serum lipid level, or weight improves when patients switch immunosuppression therapy, we retrospectively studied 26 liver transplant recipients with stable graft function who had been converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus therapy with a median follow-up of 8 months. One of the 26 patients developed pruritus necessitating withdrawal of tacrolimus. The results therefore concern the remaining 25 patients. With the exception of a small decrease in bilirubin level (P &lt;.05), there was no difference in graft or renal function after conversion. Mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 158 +/- 25 to 148 +/- 22 mm Hg over a mean of 8 +/- 3 months after conversion to tacrolimus (P =.015), whereas mean serum cholesterol level decreased from 5.3 +/- 0.9 to 4.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/L (P =.01). Sixty-eight percent of the patients lost weight, from a mean of 79.4 +/- 22.6 to 76.1 +/- 20.1 kg, in the 11 months after switching to tacrolimus therapy (P =.024). Serum triglyceride and blood glucose levels did not change, and no patient developed diabetes mellitus after conversion. These results indicate that switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus can reduce blood pressure, serum cholesterol level, and weight after liver transplantation.
[Drug-Disease]: tacrolimus - Hypertension
[Title]: [Anesthetic management for cesarean delivery in a pregnant patient with congenital antithrombin III deficiency and pulmonary thromboembolism].
[Abstract]: Antithrombin III (AT III) deficiency is a rare hereditary disease that predisposes a patient to thromboembolic complications. Anticoagulation is essential for preventing recurrence of thrombi. Concentrated AT III replacement is reserved for acute periods of thromboembolism or moments of increased risk. Hemostatic anomalies are generally considered a contraindication for regional anesthesia, due to the potential risk of spinal hematoma. This paper describes a woman with congenital AT III deficiency and heparin-treated pulmonary embolism whose pregnancy of 29 weeks had to be terminated by cesarean section upon signs of fetal distress. We discuss the pathophysiology and treatment in such cases.
[Drug-Disease]: heparin - congenital AT III deficiency