Ayushnangia/finbench-data huggingface dataset:
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2.1 6.0 8.1 .

( square feet in millions )
unitedstates
othercountries
total
owned facilities1
30.7
17.2
47.9
leased facilities2
2.1
6.0
8.1
total facilities
32.8
23.2
56.0

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .
2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option .
our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .
and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .
we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead .
we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 .
a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies .
incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use .
our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 .
outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china .
our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 .
additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory .
our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam .
in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .
we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .
we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .
for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 3 .
legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: what percentage of total facilities as measured in square feet are leased?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(8.1, 56.0)
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500 index" ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor's industrials index ( "s&p industrials index" ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor's consumer durables & apparel index ( "s&p consumer durables & apparel index" ) , from december 31 , 2012 through december 31 , 2017 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 43.94 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2012 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
masco
$ 138.48
$ 155.26
$ 200.79
$ 227.08
$ 318.46
s&p 500 index
$ 132.04
$ 149.89
$ 151.94
$ 169.82
$ 206.49
s&p industrials index
$ 140.18
$ 153.73
$ 149.83
$ 177.65
$ 214.55
s&p consumer durables & apparel index
$ 135.84
$ 148.31
$ 147.23
$ 138.82
$ 164.39

$ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ 350.00 masco s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2017?
Calculation: subtract(318.46, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(206.49, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 recourse debt as of december 31 , 2010 is scheduled to reach maturity as set forth in the table below : december 31 , annual maturities ( in millions ) .

december 31,
annual maturities ( in millions )
2011
$ 463
2012
2014
2013
2014
2014
497
2015
500
thereafter
3152
total recourse debt
$ 4612

recourse debt transactions during 2010 , the company redeemed $ 690 million aggregate principal of its 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) second priority senior secured notes due 2013 ( 201cthe 2013 notes 201d ) .
the 2013 notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 101.458% ( 101.458 % ) of the principal amount redeemed .
the company recognized a pre-tax loss on the redemption of the 2013 notes of $ 15 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 , which is included in 201cother expense 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations .
on july 29 , 2010 , the company entered into a second amendment ( 201camendment no .
2 201d ) to the fourth amended and restated credit and reimbursement agreement , dated as of july 29 , 2008 , among the company , various subsidiary guarantors and various lending institutions ( the 201cexisting credit agreement 201d ) that amends and restates the existing credit agreement ( as so amended and restated by amendment no .
2 , the 201cfifth amended and restated credit agreement 201d ) .
the fifth amended and restated credit agreement adjusted the terms and conditions of the existing credit agreement , including the following changes : 2022 the aggregate commitment for the revolving credit loan facility was increased to $ 800 million ; 2022 the final maturity date of the revolving credit loan facility was extended to january 29 , 2015 ; 2022 changes to the facility fee applicable to the revolving credit loan facility ; 2022 the interest rate margin applicable to the revolving credit loan facility is now based on the credit rating assigned to the loans under the credit agreement , with pricing currently at libor + 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) ; 2022 there is an undrawn fee of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum ; 2022 the company may incur a combination of additional term loan and revolver commitments so long as total term loan and revolver commitments ( including those currently outstanding ) do not exceed $ 1.4 billion ; and 2022 the negative pledge ( i.e. , a cap on first lien debt ) of $ 3.0 billion .
recourse debt covenants and guarantees certain of the company 2019s obligations under the senior secured credit facility are guaranteed by its direct subsidiaries through which the company owns its interests in the aes shady point , aes hawaii , aes warrior run and aes eastern energy businesses .
the company 2019s obligations under the senior secured credit facility are , subject to certain exceptions , secured by : ( i ) all of the capital stock of domestic subsidiaries owned directly by the company and 65% ( 65 % ) of the capital stock of certain foreign subsidiaries owned directly or indirectly by the company ; and .

Question: what percent of total recourse debt is current?
Answer: 10%
Calculation: divide(463, 4612)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc .
altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc .
peer group ( 1 ) .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis .
source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date .
( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc .
peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc .
and reynolds american inc .
note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc .
( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc .
( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc .
to mondel 0113z international , inc .
( mdlz ) .
on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc .
merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j .
heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) .
on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc .
( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc .
( lo ) .
on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc .
( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc .
( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc .
to conagra brands , inc .
( cag ) . .

date
altria group inc .
altria group inc . peer group
s&p 500
december 2011
$ 100.00
$ 100.00
$ 100.00
december 2012
$ 111.77
$ 108.78
$ 115.99
december 2013
$ 143.69
$ 135.61
$ 153.55
december 2014
$ 193.28
$ 151.74
$ 174.55
december 2015
$ 237.92
$ 177.04
$ 176.94
december 2016
$ 286.61
$ 192.56
$ 198.09

altria altria group , inc .
group , inc .
peer group s&p 500 .

Question: did altria outperform the s&p 500?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(286.61, 198.09)
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .

( in thousands )
at december 31 , 2016
at december 31 , 2015
at december 31 , 2014
at december 31 , 2013
at december 31 , 2012
cash and cash equivalents
$ 250470
$ 129852
$ 593175
$ 347489
$ 341841
working capital ( 1 )
1279337
1019953
1127772
702181
651370
inventories
917491
783031
536714
469006
319286
total assets
3644331
2865970
2092428
1576369
1155052
total debt including current maturities
817388
666070
281546
151551
59858
total stockholders 2019 equity
$ 2030900
$ 1668222
$ 1350300
$ 1053354
$ 816922

( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio?
Answer: 22.4%
Calculation: divide(817388, 3644331)
2 0 1 9 a n n u a l r e p o r t1 6 performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2019 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company .
historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
jkhy
100.00
110.51
151.12
182.15
231.36
240.29
2019 peer group
100.00
126.23
142.94
166.15
224.73
281.09
2018 peer group
100.00
127.40
151.16
177.26
228.97
286.22
s&p 500
100.00
107.42
111.71
131.70
150.64
166.33

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2014 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .
total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .
peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .
some peer participant companies were different for fiscal year ended 2019 compared to fiscal year ended 2018 .
the company 2019s compensation committee of the board of directors adjusted the peer participants due to consolidations within the industry during the 2019 fiscal year .
companies in the 2019 peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; black knight , inc. ; bottomline technologies , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions , inc. ; cardtronics plc ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; exlservice holdings , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; fleetcor technologies , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; square , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total system services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verint systems , inc. ; and wex , inc .
companies in the 2018 peer group were aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone .

Question: was the five year total return of the 2019 peer group greater than the 2018 peer group?
Answer: no
Calculation: greater(281.09, 286.22)
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

( in millions )
2011
2010
2009
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production and administrative costs
$ -7922 ( 7922 )
$ -6330 ( 6330 )
$ -4876 ( 4876 )
net changes in prices and production and administrative costs related to future production
12313
9843
4840
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs
1454
1268
1399
development costs incurred during the period
1899
2546
2786
changes in estimated future development costs
-1349 ( 1349 )
-2153 ( 2153 )
-3773 ( 3773 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates
2526
1117
5110
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place
233
-20 ( 20 )
-159 ( 159 )
accretion of discount
2040
1335
787
net change in income taxes
-6676 ( 6676 )
-4231 ( 4231 )
-4345 ( 4345 )
timing and other
130
250
-149 ( 149 )
net change for the year
4648
3625
1620
beginning of the year
9280
5655
4035
end of year
$ 13928
$ 9280
$ 5655

.

Question: what was the average net annual change in discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) for the years 2011 , 2010 , and 2009?
Answer: 3298
Calculation: table_average(net change for the year, none)
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income increased $ 0.8 million primarily due to higher other income , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower interest expense , substantially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax rate .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue
$ 705.4
volume/weather
-18.2 ( 18.2 )
retail electric price
13.5
other
2.4
2017 net revenue
$ 703.1

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in rates , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in the energy efficiency rider , effective with the first billing cycle of february 2017 , each as approved by the mpsc .
the increase was partially offset by decreased storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the november 2016 billing cycle .
entergy mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the september 2017 billing cycle .
see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider. .

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Answer: 704.25
Calculation: add(703.1, 705.4), add(#0, const_2), divide(#1, const_2)
there were no share repurchases in 2016 .
stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

12/11
12/12
12/13
12/14
12/15
12/16
fidelity national information services inc .
100.00
134.12
210.97
248.68
246.21
311.81
s&p 500
100.00
116.00
153.58
174.60
177.01
198.18
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services
100.00
126.06
194.91
218.05
247.68
267.14

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
item 6 .
selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . compared to the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/16?
Answer: 113.63%
Calculation: subtract(198.18, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(311.81, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#3, #1)
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .

2016
high
low
quarter ended march 31
$ 102.93
$ 83.07
quarter ended june 30
113.63
101.87
quarter ended september 30
118.26
107.57
quarter ended december 31
118.09
99.72
2015
high
low
quarter ended march 31
$ 101.88
$ 93.21
quarter ended june 30
98.64
91.99
quarter ended september 30
101.54
86.83
quarter ended december 31
104.12
87.23

on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse .
as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders .
dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) .
generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) .
we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) .
dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors .
the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant .
we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: for the quarter ended march 312015 what was the percentage change in the share price from the highest to the lowest
Answer: 9.3%
Calculation: subtract(101.88, 93.21), divide(#0, 93.21)