Ayushnangia/finbench-data huggingface dataset:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 26 , 2008 through october 27 , 2013 .
this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 26 , 2008 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .
dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .
the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * assumes $ 100 invested on 10/26/08 in stock or 10/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

10/26/2008
10/25/2009
10/31/2010
10/30/2011
10/28/2012
10/27/2013
applied materials
100.00
116.07
113.08
118.21
102.77
175.76
s&p 500 index
100.00
109.80
127.94
138.29
159.32
202.61
rdg semiconductor composite index
100.00
124.98
153.98
166.89
149.81
200.47

dividends during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share .
during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 per share .
during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.07 .
dividends declared during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 469 million , $ 438 million and $ 408 million , respectively .
applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders. .

Question: what is the total return if 100000 are invested in applied materials in 2008 and sold in 2011?
Answer: 18210
Calculation: divide(100000, const_100), subtract(118.21, const_100), multiply(#0, #1)
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

1/2/2010
1/1/2011
12/31/2011
12/29/2012
12/28/2013
1/3/2015
cadence design systems inc .
100.00
137.90
173.62
224.37
232.55
314.36
nasdaq composite
100.00
117.61
118.70
139.00
196.83
223.74
s&p 400 information technology
100.00
128.72
115.22
135.29
173.25
187.84

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . and the nasdaq copmosite for the period ended 1/3/2015?
Answer: 90.62%
Calculation: subtract(314.36, const_100), divide(#0, const_100), subtract(223.74, const_100), divide(#2, const_100), subtract(#1, #3)
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the plan to reflect the allied acquisition .
the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provides for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards .
awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition .
awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic prior to such date .
as of december 31 , 2013 , there were approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan .
stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .
we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .
expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .
the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .
we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options .
when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .
the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 5.27 , $ 4.77 and $ 5.35 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

2013
2012
2011
expected volatility
28.9% ( 28.9 % )
27.8% ( 27.8 % )
27.3% ( 27.3 % )
risk-free interest rate
0.7% ( 0.7 % )
0.8% ( 0.8 % )
1.7% ( 1.7 % )
dividend yield
3.2% ( 3.2 % )
3.2% ( 3.2 % )
2.7% ( 2.7 % )
expected life ( in years )
4.5
4.5
4.4
contractual life ( in years )
7.0
7.0
7.0

.

Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 3.95%
Explanation: the change in volatility from 2012 to 2013 was 3.95%
Calculation: subtract(28.9, 27.8), divide(#0, 27.8)
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 281 pledged assets at december 31 , 2010 , assets were pledged to collateralize repur- chase agreements , other securities financing agreements , derivative transactions and for other purposes , including to secure borrowings and public deposits .
certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged by the secured parties and are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consoli- dated balance sheets .
in addition , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had pledged $ 288.7 billion and $ 344.6 billion , respectively , of financial instruments it owns that may not be sold or repledged by the secured parties .
the significant components of the firm 2019s pledged assets were as follows. .

december 31 ( in billions )
2010
2009
securities
$ 112.1
$ 155.3
loans
214.8
285.5
trading assets and other
123.2
84.6
totalassetspledged ( a )
$ 450.1
$ 525.4

total assets pledged ( a ) $ 450.1 $ 525.4 ( a ) total assets pledged do not include assets of consolidated vies ; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities .
see note 16 on pages 244 2013 259 of this annual report for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated vies .
collateral at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had accepted assets as collateral that it could sell or repledge , deliver or otherwise use with a fair value of approximately $ 655.0 billion and $ 635.6 billion , respectively .
this collateral was generally obtained under resale agreements , securities borrowing agreements , cus- tomer margin loans and derivative agreements .
of the collateral received , approximately $ 521.3 billion and $ 472.7 billion were sold or repledged , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales and to collat- eralize deposits and derivative agreements .
the reporting of collat- eral sold or repledged was revised in 2010 to include certain securities used to cover short sales and to collateralize deposits and derivative agreements .
prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation .
this revision had no impact on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets or its results of operations .
contingencies in 2008 , the firm resolved with the irs issues related to compliance with reporting and withholding requirements for certain accounts transferred to the bank of new york mellon corporation ( 201cbnym 201d ) in connection with the firm 2019s sale to bnym of its corporate trust business .
the resolution of these issues did not have a material effect on the firm. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2009 , what percentage of the collateral that it was able to sell , repledge , deliver , or otherwise use was actually used for these purposes?
Answer: 74.4%
Calculation: divide(472.7, 635.6)
entergy louisiana , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses .
2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

( in millions )
2003 net revenue
$ 973.7
price applied to unbilled sales
-31.9 ( 31.9 )
deferred fuel cost revisions
-29.4 ( 29.4 )
rate refund provisions
-12.2 ( 12.2 )
volume/weather
17.0
summer capacity charges
11.8
other
2.3
2004 net revenue
$ 931.3

the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs .
the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .
rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds .
the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors .
the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .
the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what is the decrease in net income as a percentage of the the decrease in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 44.1%
Calculation: subtract(973.7, 931.3), divide(18.7, #0)
intangible asset amortization expense amounted to $ 12 million , $ 4 million and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
estimated amortization expense for the next five years subsequent to december 31 , 2018 is as follows: .

amount
2019
$ 15
2020
13
2021
11
2022
10
2023
7

note 9 : shareholders 2019 equity common stock under the dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan ( the 201cdrip 201d ) , shareholders may reinvest cash dividends and purchase additional company common stock , up to certain limits , through the plan administrator without commission fees .
shares purchased by participants through the drip may be newly issued shares , treasury shares , or at the company 2019s election , shares purchased by the plan administrator in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions .
purchases generally will be made and credited to drip accounts once each week .
as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately 4.2 million shares available for future issuance under the drip .
anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time .
the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

Question: the company repurchased how many million shares of common stock in the open market for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017?
Calculation: add(0.6, 0.7)
grants of restricted awards are subject to forfeiture if a grantee , among other conditions , leaves our employment prior to expiration of the restricted period .
new grants of restricted awards generally vest one year after the date of grant in 25% ( 25 % ) increments over a four year period , with the exception of tsrs which vest after a three year period .
the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the years ended may 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( share awards in thousands ) : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

shares
weighted averagegrant-datefair value
non-vested at may 31 2011
869
$ 40
granted
472
48
vested
-321 ( 321 )
40
forfeited
-79 ( 79 )
43
non-vested at may 31 2012
941
44
granted
561
44
vested
-315 ( 315 )
43
forfeited
-91 ( 91 )
44
non-vested at may 31 2013
1096
$ 44

the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 13.6 million , $ 12.9 million and $ 10.8 million , respectively .
we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 16.2 million , $ 13.6 million , and $ 12.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
as of may 31 , 2013 , there was $ 33.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years .
employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized .
employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock .
the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period .
as of may 31 , 2013 , 1.0 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.4 million shares reserved for future issuance .
we recognized compensation expense for the plan of $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan during the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 6 , $ 7 and $ 6 , respectively , which represents the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount .
stock options stock options are granted at 100% ( 100 % ) of fair market value on the date of grant and have 10-year terms .
stock options granted vest one year after the date of grant in 25% ( 25 % ) increments over a four year period .
the plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions .
there were no options granted under the plans during the years ended may 31 , 2013 and may 31 , 2012. .

Question: what is the total fair value of the granted shares in 2013 , ( in thousands ) ?
Answer: 24684
Calculation: multiply(561, 44)
future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases at may 31 , 2013 were as follows : fiscal years ending may 31: .

2014
$ 11057
2015
8985
2016
7378
2017
6700
2018
6164
thereafter
16812
total future minimum lease payments
$ 57096

we are party to a number of claims and lawsuits incidental to our business .
in our opinion , the liabilities , if any , which may ultimately result from the outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations .
operating taxes we define operating taxes as taxes that are unrelated to income taxes , such as sales , property , value-add and other business taxes .
during the course of operations , we must interpret the meaning of various operating tax matters in the united states and in the foreign jurisdictions in which we do business .
taxing authorities in those various jurisdictions may arrive at different interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to such operating tax matters , which could result in the payment of additional taxes in those jurisdictions .
as of may 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we did not have liabilities for contingencies related to operating tax items based on management 2019s best estimate given our history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and regulations .
bin/ica agreements we have entered into sponsorship or depository and processing agreements with certain banks .
these agreements allow us to use the banks 2019 identification numbers , referred to as bank identification number ( 201cbin 201d ) for visa transactions and interbank card association ( 201cica 201d ) number for mastercard transactions , to clear credit card transactions through visa and mastercard .
certain of such agreements contain financial covenants , and we were in compliance with all such covenants as of may 31 , 2013 .
our canadian visa sponsorship , which was originally obtained through a canadian financial institution , expired in march 2011 .
we have filed an application with the office of the superintendent of financial institutions canada ( 201cosfi 201d ) for the formation of a wholly owned loan company in canada which would serve as our financial institution sponsor .
on december 12 , 2012 , the loan company received a restricted order to commence and carry on business from osfi which will enable the loan company to become a direct visa member at such time that global payments concludes the appropriate bin transfer process with visa .
in march 2011 , we obtained temporary direct participation in the visa canada system , while the loan company application was pending .
we anticipate that the bin transfer process with visa will be completed by september 30 , 2013. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the expected minimum payments from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -18.7%
Calculation: subtract(8985, 11057)
the following shares were excluded from the calculation of average shares outstanding 2013 diluted as their effect was anti- dilutive ( shares in millions ) . .

2018
2017
2016
mandatory convertible preferred stock
n/a
39
39
convertible notes
2014
14
14
stock options ( 1 )
9
11
13
stock awards
2014
7
8

( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively .
in 2017 , had arconic generated sufficient net income , 30 million , 14 million , 5 million , and 1 million potential shares of common stock related to the mandatory convertible preferred stock , convertible notes , stock awards , and stock options , respectively , would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding .
the mandatory convertible preferred stock converted on october 2 , 2017 ( see note i ) .
in 2016 , had arconic generated sufficient net income , 28 million , 10 million , 4 million , and 1 million potential shares of common stock related to the mandatory convertible preferred stock , convertible notes , stock awards , and stock options , respectively , would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding. .

Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the estimated total value of stock options in 2018 , in millions of dollars?
Answer: 241.11
Explanation: it is the average exercise price of options per share multiplied by the number of shares .
Calculation: multiply(9, 26.79)
.

currency
2012
2011
2010
real
$ 40.4
$ 42.4
$ 32.5
euro
27.1
26.4
18.6
pound sterling
18.5
17.6
9.0
indian rupee
4.3
3.6
2.6
total impact
$ 90.3
$ 90.0
$ 62.7

the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant .
revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s .
dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 .
our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations .
our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions .
we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes .
we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal .
these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 3%
Calculation: subtract(27.1, 26.4), divide(#0, 26.4)