# Table	of	Contents

# UNITED	STATES	SECURITIES	AND	EXCHANGE	COMMISSION

ANNUAL	REPORT	PURSUANT	TO	SECTION	13	OR	15(d)

OF	THE	SECURITIES	EXCHANGE	ACT	OF	1934

# ZIMMER	HOLDINGS,	INC.

(Exact	name	of	registrant	as	specified	in	its	charter)

Delaware

(State	of	Incorporation)

345	East	Main	Street	Warsaw,	Indiana

(Address	of	principal	executive	offices)

(IRS	Employer	Identification	No.)

(Zip	Code)

Registrant's	telephone	number,	including	area	code:	(574)	267-6131

Securities	registered	pursuant	to	Section	12(b)	of	the	Act:

Securities	registered	pursuant	to	Section	12(g)	of	the	Act:	None

Indicate	by	check	mark	if	the	registrant	is	a	well-known	seasoned	issuer,	as	defined	in	Rule	405	of	the	Securities	Act.	Yes	þ					No	o

Indicate	by	check	mark	if	the	registrant	is	not	required	to	file	reports	pursuant	to	Section	13	or	Section	15(d)	of	the	Act.	Yes	o					No	þ

Indicate	by	check	mark	whether	the	registrant	(1)	has	filed	all	reports	required	to	be	filed	by	Section	13	or	15(d)	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934	during	the	preceding	12	months	(or	for	such	shorter	period	that	the	registrant	was required	to	file	such	reports),	and	(2)	has	been	subject	to	such	filing	requirements	for	the	past	90	days.	Yes	þ					No	o

Indicate	by	check	mark	whether	the	registrant	has	submitted	electronically	and	posted	on	its	corporate	Web	site,	if	any,	every	Interactive	Data	File	required	to	be	submitted	and	posted	pursuant	to	Rule	405	of	Regulation	S-T	(§	232.405	of this	chapter)	during	the	preceding	12	months	(or	for	such	shorter	period	that	the	registrant	was	required	to	submit	and	post	such	files).		Yes	þ					No	o

Indicate	by	check	mark	if	disclosure	of	delinquent	filers	pursuant	to	Item	405	of	Regulation	S-K	is	not	contained	herein,	and	will	not	be	contained,	to	the	best	of	the	registrant's	knowledge,	in	definitive	proxy	or	information	statements incorporated	by	reference	in	Part	III	of	this	Form	10-K	or	any	amendment	to	this	Form	10-K.		þ

Indicate	by	check	mark	whether	the	registrant	is	a	large	accelerated	filer,	an	accelerated	filer,	a	non-accelerated	filer	or	a	smaller	reporting	company.	See	the	definitions	of	"large	accelerated	filer,"	"accelerated	filer"	and	"smaller	reporting company"	in	Rule	12b-2	of	the	Exchange	Act.	(Check	one):

Large	accelerated	filer	þ Accelerated	filer	o Non-accelerated	filer	o Smaller	reporting	company	o (Do	not	check	if	a	smaller	reporting	company)

Indicate	by	check	mark	whether	the	registrant	is	a	shell	company	(as	defined	Exchange	Act	Rule	12b-2).	Yes	o					No	þ

The	aggregate	market	value	of	shares	held	by	non-affiliates	was	$9,120,369,894	(based	on	the	closing	price	of	these	shares	on	the	New	York	Stock	Exchange	on	June	30,	2009	and	assuming	solely	for	the	purpose	of	this	calculation	that	all directors	and	executive	officers	of	the	registrant	are	"affiliates").	As	of	February	12,	2010,	202,790,978	shares	of	the	registrant's	$.01	par	value	common	stock	were	outstanding.

Documents	Incorporated	by	Reference

This	annual	report	contains	certain	statements	that	are	forward-looking	statements	within	the	meaning	of	federal	securities	laws.	When	used	in	this	report,	the	words	"may,"	"will,"	"should,"	"anticipate,"	"estimate,"	"expect,"	"plan," "believe,"	"predict,"	"potential,"	"project,"	"target,"	"forecast,"	"intend"	and	similar	expressions	are	intended	to	identify	forward-looking	statements.	Forward-looking	statements	are	subject	to	risks	and	uncertainties	that	could	cause	actual results	to	differ	materially	from	those	projected.	These	risks	and	uncertainties	include	the	important	risks	and	uncertainties	that	may	affect	our	future	operations	that	we	describe	in	Part	I,	Item	1A	—	Risk	Factors	of	this	report.	We	may update	that	discussion	in	Part	II,	Item	1A	—	Risk	Factors	in	a	Quarterly	Report	on	Form	10-Q	we	file	hereafter.	Readers	of	this	report	are	cautioned	not	to	place	undue	reliance	on	these	forward-looking	statements.	While	we	believe	the assumptions	on	which	the	forward-looking	statements	are	based	are	reasonable,	there	can	be	no	assurance	that	these	forward-looking	statements	will	prove	to	be	accurate.	This	cautionary	statement	is	applicable	to	all	forward-looking statements	contained	in	this	report.

# PART	I

Item	1. Business

Item	1A. Risk	Factors

Item	1B. Unresolved	Staff	Comments

Item	2. Properties

Item	3. Legal	Proceedings

Item	4. Submission	of	Matters	to	a	Vote	of	Security	Holders 19

# PART	II

Item	5. Market	for	the	Registrant's	Common	Equity,	Related	Stockholder	Matters	and	Issuer	Purchases	of	Equity	Securities 20

Item	6. Selected	Financial	Data 21

Item	7. Management's	Discussion	and	Analysis	of	Financial	Condition	and	Results	of	Operations

Item	7A. Quantitative	and	Qualitative	Disclosures	About	Market	Risk

Item	8. Financial	Statements	and	Supplementary	Data

Item	9. Changes	in	and	Disagreements	With	Accountants	on	Accounting	and	Financial	Disclosure

Item	9A. Controls	and	Procedures 65

Item	9B. Other	Information 65

# PART	III

Item	10. Directors,	Executive	Officers	and	Corporate	Governance 66

Item	11. Executive	Compensation

Item	12. Security	Ownership	of	Certain	Beneficial	Owners	and	Management	and	Related	Stockholder	Matters

Item	13. Certain	Relationships	and	Related	Transactions	and	Director	Independence 66 Item	14. Principal	Accountant	Fees	and	Services 66

# PART	IV

# OVERVIEW

We	are	a	global	leader	in	the	design,	development,	manufacture	and	marketing	of	orthopaedic	reconstructive	implants,	dental	implants,	spinal	implants,	trauma	products	and	related	surgical	products.	We	also	provide	other	healthcare related	services.	In	this	report,	"Zimmer,"	"we,"	"us,"	"our"	and	similar	words	refer	collectively	to	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	its	subsidiaries.	Zimmer	Holdings	refers	to	the	parent	company	only.

Zimmer	Holdings	was	incorporated	in	Delaware	in	2001.	Our	history	dates	to	1927,	when	Zimmer	Manufacturing	Company,	a	predecessor,	was	founded	in	Warsaw,	Indiana.	On	August	6,	2001,	Zimmer	Holdings	was	spun	off	from its	former	parent	and	became	an	independent	public	company.

# CUSTOMERS,	SALES	AND	MARKETING

Our	primary	customers	include	orthopaedic	surgeons,	neurosurgeons,	oral	surgeons,	dentists,	hospitals,	stocking	distributors,	healthcare	dealers	and,	in	their	capacity	as	agents,	healthcare	purchasing	organizations	or	buying	groups. These	customers	range	from	large	multinational	enterprises	to	independent	surgeons.

We	have	operations	in	more	than	25	countries	and	market	products	in	more	than	100	countries,	with	corporate	headquarters	in	Warsaw,	Indiana,	and	more	than	100	manufacturing,	distribution	and	warehousing	and/or	office	facilities worldwide.	We	manage	our	operations	through	three	major	geographic	segments	—	the	Americas,	which	is	comprised	principally	of	the	United	States	and	includes	other	North,	Central	and	South	American	markets;	Europe,	which	is comprised	principally	of	Europe	and	includes	the	Middle	East	and	Africa;	and	Asia	Pacific,	which	is	comprised	primarily	of	Japan	and	Australia	and	includes	other	Asian	and	Pacific	markets.

We	market	and	sell	products	through	three	principal	channels:	1)	direct	to	healthcare	institutions,	such	as	hospitals	or	direct	channel	accounts;	2)	through	stocking	distributors	and	healthcare	dealers;	and	3)	directly	to	dental	practices and	dental	laboratories.	With	direct	channel	accounts,	inventory	is	generally	consigned	to	sales	agents	or	customers.	With	sales	to	stocking	distributors,	healthcare	dealers,	dental	practices	and	dental	laboratories,	title	to	product	passes generally	upon	shipment.	Direct	channel	accounts	represented	approximately	80	percent	of	our	net	sales	in	2009.	No	individual	direct	channel	account,	stocking	distributor,	healthcare	dealer,	dental	practice	or	dental	laboratory	accounted	for more	than	1	percent	of	our	net	sales	for	2009.

We	stock	inventory	in	our	warehouse	facilities	and	retain	title	to	consigned	inventory	in	sufficient	quantities	so	that	products	are	available	when	needed	for	surgical	procedures.	Safety	stock	levels	are	determined	based	on	a	number	of factors,	including	demand,	manufacturing	lead	times	and	quantities	required	to	maintain	service	levels.	We	also	carry	trade	accounts	receivable	balances	based	on	credit	terms	that	are	generally	consistent	with	local	market	practices.

We	utilize	a	network	of	sales	associates,	sales	managers	and	support	personnel,	most	of	whom	are	employed	or	contracted	by	independent	distributors	and	sales	agencies.	We	invest	a	significant	amount	of	time	and	expense	in	training sales	associates	in	how	to	use	specific	products	and	how	to	best	inform	surgeons	of	product	features	and	uses.	Sales	force	representatives	must	have	strong	technical	selling	skills	and	medical	education	to	provide	technical	support	for surgeons.

In	response	to	the	different	healthcare	systems	throughout	the	world,	our	sales	and	marketing	strategies	and	organizational	structures	differ	by	region.	We	utilize	a	global	approach	to	sales	force	training,	marketing	and	medical education	to	provide	consistent,	high	quality	service.	Additionally,	we	keep	current	with	key	surgical	developments	and	other	issues	related	to	orthopaedic	surgeons,	neurosurgeons,	dentists	and	oral	surgeons	and	the	medical	procedures	they perform. Americas.		The	Americas	is	our	largest	geographic	segment,	accounting	for	$2,372.4	million,	or	58	percent,	of	2009	net	sales,	with	the	United	States	accounting	for	94	percent	of	net	sales	in	this	region.	The	United	States	sales	force primarily	consists	of	independent	sales	agents,	most	of	whom	sell	products	exclusively	for	Zimmer.	Sales	agents	in	the	United	States	receive	a	commission	on	product	sales	and	are	responsible	for	many	operating	decisions	and	costs.	Sales commissions	are	accrued	at	the	time	of	sale.

In	this	region,	we	contract	with	group	purchasing	organizations	and	managed	care	accounts	and	have	promoted	unit	growth	by	offering	volume	discounts	to	customer	healthcare	institutions	within	a	specified	group.	Generally,	we	are designated	as	one	of	several	preferred	purchasing	sources	for	specified	products,	although	members	are	not	obligated	to	purchase	our	products.	Contracts	with	group	purchasing	organizations	generally	have	a	term	of	three	years	with extensions	as	warranted.

A	majority	of	hospitals	in	the	United	States	belong	to	at	least	one	group	purchasing	organization.	In	2009,	individual	hospital	orders	purchased	through	contractual	arrangements	with	our	two	largest	group	purchasing	organizations accounted	for	approximately	34	percent	of	our	net	sales	in	the	United	States.	Contractual	sales	were	highest	through	Novation,	LLC	and	Premier	Purchasing	Partners,	L.P.	No	individual	end-user,	however,	accounted	for	over	1	percent	of	our net	sales,	and	the	top	ten	end-users	accounted	for	approximately	4	percent	of	our	aggregate	net	sales	in	the	United	States.

In	the	Americas,	we	monitor	and	rank	independent	sales	agents	across	a	range	of	performance	metrics	including	the	achievement	of	certain	sales	targets	and	maintenance	of	efficient	levels	of	working	capital.

Europe.		The	European	geographic	segment	accounted	for	$1,119.2	million,	or	27	percent,	of	2009	net	sales,	with	France,	Germany,	Italy,	Spain,	Switzerland	and	the	United	Kingdom	collectively	accounting	for	over	75	percent	of	net sales	in	the	region.	This	segment	also	includes	other	key	markets,	including	Benelux,	Nordic,	Central	and	Eastern	Europe,	the	Middle	East	and	Africa.	Our	sales	force	in	this	region	is	comprised	of	direct	sales	associates,	commissioned agents,	independent	distributors	and	sales	support	personnel.	In	Europe,	we	emphasize	the	advantages	of	our	clinically	proven,	established	designs	and	innovative	solutions,	such	as	minimally	invasive	surgical	procedures	and	technologies and	new	and	enhanced	materials	and	surfaces.

Asia	Pacific.		The	Asia	Pacific	geographic	segment	accounted	for	$603.8	million,	or	15	percent,	of	2009	net	sales,	with	Japan	being	the	largest	market	within	this	segment,	accounting	for	approximately	58	percent	of	the	region's	sales. This	segment	also	includes	key	markets	such	as	Australia,	New	Zealand,	Korea,	China,	Taiwan,	India,	Thailand,	Singapore,	Hong	Kong	and	Malaysia.	In	Japan	and	most	countries	in	the	Asia	Pacific	region,	we	maintain	a	network	of	dealers, who	act	as	order	agents	on	behalf	of	hospitals	in	the	region,	and	sales	associates,	who	build	and	maintain	relationships	with	orthopaedic	surgeons,	neurosurgeons	and	dental	surgeons	in	their	markets.	These	sales	associates	cover	over	7,000 hospitals	in	the	region.	The	knowledge	and	skills	of	our	sales	associates	play	a	critical	role	in	providing	service,	product	information	and	support	to	surgeons.

# SEASONALITY

Our	business	is	somewhat	seasonal	in	nature,	as	many	of	our	products	are	used	in	elective	procedures,	which	typically	decline	during	the	summer	months	and	holiday	seasons.

# DISTRIBUTION

We	operate	distribution	facilities	domestically	in	Warsaw,	Indiana;	Dover,	Ohio;	Statesville,	North	Carolina;	Memphis,	Tennessee;	Carlsbad,	California;	and	Austin,	Texas	and	internationally,	in	Australia,	Austria,	Belgium,	Canada, the	Czech	Republic,	China,	Finland,	France,	Germany,	Hong	Kong,	India,	Italy,	Japan,	Korea,	Malaysia,	the	Netherlands,	New	Zealand,	Portugal,	Russia,	Singapore,	South	Africa,	Spain,	Sweden,	Switzerland,	Taiwan,	Thailand	and	the United	Kingdom.	In	2009,	we	completed	construction	of	our	highly	automated,	state-of-the-art	distribution	facility	in	Eschbach,	Germany.	This	new	facility	supports	direct	to	customer,	country	and	dealer	shipments	for	the	European	region and	global	shipments	for	products	sourced	from	certain	European-based	supply	chain	sites.

We	generally	ship	our	orders	via	expedited	courier.	We	do	not	consider	our	backlog	of	firm	orders	to	be	material	to	an	understanding	of	our	business.

# PRODUCTS

Our	products	include	orthopaedic	reconstructive	implants,	dental	implants,	spinal	implants,	trauma	products	and	related	surgical	products.

We	utilize	our	exclusive	Trabecular	MetalTM	Technology	across	various	product	categories.	Trabecular	Metal	material	is	a	structural	biomaterial	with	a	cellular	architecture	that	resembles	bone	and	approximates	its	physical	and mechanical	properties	more	closely	than	other	prosthetic	materials.	The	highly	porous	trabecular	configuration	is	conducive	to	more	normal	bone	formation	and	bone	in-growth.	Trabecular	Metal	implants	are	fabricated	using	elemental tantalum	metal	and	a	patented	vapor	deposition	technique	that	creates	a	metallic	strut	configuration	resembling	cancellous	bone	with	nano-textured	surface	features.

# Orthopaedic	Reconstructive	Implants

# Knee	Implants

Total	knee	replacement	surgeries	typically	include	a	femoral	component,	a	patella	(knee	cap),	a	tibial	tray	and	an	articular	surface	(placed	on	the	tibial	tray).	Knee	replacement	surgeries	include	first-time,	or	primary,	joint	replacement procedures	and	revision	procedures	for	the	replacement,	repair	or	enhancement	of	an	implant	or	component	from	a	previous	procedure.	Knee	implants	are	designed	to	accommodate	different	levels	of	ligament	stabilization	of	the	joint.	While some	knee	implant	designs,	called	cruciate	retaining	(CR)	designs,	require	the	retention	of	the	posterior	cruciate	ligament,	other	designs,	called	posterior	stabilized	(PS)	and	ultracongruent	(UC)	designs,	provide	joint	stability	without	the posterior	cruciate	ligament.	There	are	also	procedures	for	partial	reconstruction	of	the	knee,	which	treat	limited	knee	degeneration	and	involve	the	replacement	of	only	one	side,	or	compartment,	of	the	knee	with	a	unicompartmental	knee prosthesis.

Our	portfolio	of	Minimally	Invasive	SolutionsTM	Procedures	(MIS)	includes	the	MIS	Mini-Incision	Total	Knee	Procedure.	The	MIS	Mini-Incision	Procedure	utilizes	specialized	MIS	Instruments	which	feature	smaller,	ergonomic	and highly	precise	instruments	which	accommodate	and	facilitate	a	smaller	incision	and	less	disruption	of	the	surrounding	soft	tissues.

We	offer	a	wide	range	of	products	for	specialized	knee	procedures,	including	the	following:

NexGen®	Complete	Knee	Solution.		The	number	one	selling	knee	brand	in	the	world,	the	NexGen	Knee	product	line	is	a	comprehensive	system	for	knee	replacement	surgery	which	has	significant	application	across	the continuum	of	care	in	all	things	related	to	primary	and	revision	knee	arthroplasty,	including	CR,	PS	and	revision	procedures.	The	NexGen	Knee	System	offers	joint	stability,	sizing	and	performance	options	that	can	be	tailored	to	individual patient	needs	while	providing	surgeons	with	a	unified	system	of	interchangeable	components.	The	NexGen	Knee	System	provides	surgeons	with	complete	and	versatile	knee	instrument	options	spanning	multiple	surgeon	and	treatment

philosophies,	including	soft	tissue	balancing	and	measured	resection	MIS	Mini-Incision	Instruments,	and	multiple	traditional	instrument	systems.	The	breadth	and	versatility	of	the	NexGen	Knee	System	allows	surgeons	to	transition	from	one type	of	implant	to	another	during	surgery,	according	to	the	respective	needs	of	the	patient,	and	to	support	current	surgical	philosophies.

The	NexGen	CR	product	line	is	designed	to	be	used	in	conjunction	with	a	functioning	posterior	cruciate	ligament.	Similar	to	the	posterior	stabilized	design,	the	NexGen	CR-Flex	Fixed	Bearing	Knee	is	designed	to	provide	a greater	range	of	motion	for	patients	who	require	deep	bending	in	their	activities	of	daily	living.	The	NexGen	CR-Flex	Femoral	Components	offer	a	tissue	balancing	(flexion	balancing)	solution	which	allows	the	surgeon	to	adjust	component sizing	and	balance	and	stabilize	the	implant	without	removing	additional	bone	or	wasting	critical	procedure	time.

The	NexGen	Complete	Knee	Solution	Legacy®	Knee-Posterior	Stabilized	product	line	provides	stability	in	the	absence	of	the	posterior	cruciate	ligament.	The	PS	capabilities	can	be	augmented	via	the	use	of	a	NexGen Legacy	Posterior	Stabilized	Flex	Knee	(LPS-Flex	Knee),	a	high-flexion	implant	that	has	the	potential	to	accommodate	knee	flexion	up	to	155-degrees	range	of	motion	for	patients	whose	lifestyle	and	body	type	demand	and	can	accommodate this	performance	standard.	With	the	2008	rollout	of	the	NexGen	LPS-Flex	Mobile	Knee	in	the	U.S.,	we	are	now	one	of	only	two	companies	that	can	offer	a	mobile-bearing	total	knee	treatment	option	in	the	U.S.	market	for	surgeons	and patients	that	may	be	best	suited	for	this	high	performance	implant	design.

NexGen	Knee	Gender	SolutionsTM	femorals	represent	the	first	knee	implants	specifically	shaped	to	offer	fit	and	function	optimized	for	the	unique	anatomical	considerations	more	commonly	seen	in	female	patients.	Gender implants	are	an	important	strategic	focus,	as	more	than	half	of	total	knee	arthroplasty	patients	are	female.	Gender	Solutions	femorals	are	available	in	both	NexGen	CR-Flex	and	LPS-Flex	configurations.	The	concept	of	advancing	implant design	through	customization	based	on	anatomy	or	other	patient	characteristics	has	manifested	in	rapidly	expanding	gender	technologies	across	the	continuum	of	our	products	and	into	other	important	brands	in	our	growing	portfolio.

The	NexGen	Revision	Knee	product	line	consists	of	several	different	products	that	are	designed	to	provide	clinical	solutions	to	surgeons	for	various	revision	situations,	including	multiple	constraint	levels	for	ligament	and soft	tissue	inefficiencies	and	a	bone	augmentation	implant	system	made	from	our	Trabecular	Metal	Technology	material.	These	augments	are	designed	to	address	significant	bone	loss	in	revision	surgery	while	allowing	natural	bone	to reconstruct	within	the	implant	construct.

We	offer	improved	polyethylene	performance	in	the	NexGen	Knee	System	with	our	conventional	polyethylene	and	Prolong®	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene,	which	offers	reduced	wear	and	resistance	to	oxidation,	pitting and	cracking.	Prolong	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene	is	available	in	designs	compatible	with	both	NexGen	CR-Flex	and	LPS-Flex	femoral	components.

Natural-Knee®	II	System.		The	Natural-Knee	II	System	consists	of	a	range	of	interchangeable,	anatomically	designed	implants	which	include	a	proprietary	Cancellous-Structured	TitaniumTM	(CSTiTM)	Porous	Coating	option for	stable	fixation	in	active	patients.

Gender	Solutions	Natural-Knee	Flex	System.		The	Gender	Solutions	Natural-Knee	Flex	System	adds	our	High	Flex	and	Gender	Solutions	design	concepts	to	the	Natural-Knee	System.	The	Gender	Solutions	Natural-Knee Flex	System	recognizes	that	two	distinct	populations	exist	in	total	knee	arthroplasty	(female	and	male)	and	offers	two	distinct	implant	shapes	for	enhanced	fit.	The	system	is	compatible	with	muscle	sparing	MIS	procedures	and	accommodates high	flexion	capacity	up	to	155	degrees.	The	system	features	the	proven	clinical	success	of	our	asymmetric	tibial	plate,	CSTi	porous	coating,	Prolong	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene	and	the	ultracongruent	articular	surface.

Innex®	Total	Knee	System.		The	Innex	Knee	System	offers	fixed	bearing	and	mobile	bearing	knee	components	all	designed	within	the	same	system	philosophy.	While	the	Innex	Knee	System	is	best	known	for	its	mobile bearing	knee	offering,	the	availability	of	differing	levels	of	articular	constraint,	the	Innex	Revision	Knee	and	Innex	Gender	Solutions	components	make	this	offering	a	comprehensive	mobile	and	fixed	bearing	knee	system.	The	Innex	Knee System	is	distributed	in	Europe	and	Asia	Pacific	and	is	not	currently	available	for	commercial	distribution	in	the	United	States.

Zimmer	Unicompartmental	Knee	Systems.		The	Zimmer®	Unicompartmental	Knee	System	offers	a	high	flexion	design	for	unicompartmental	knee	surgery.	This	high	flex	product	was	designed	specifically	for	MIS Procedures	and	Technologies.	The	system	offers	the	surgeon	the	ability	to	conserve	bone	by	replacing	only	the	compartment	of	the	knee	that	has	had	degenerative	changes.	A	Gender	Solutions	Patello-Femoral	Joint	System	is	also	available which	incorporates	key	gender	specific	design	features	and	a	proprietary	guided	milling	surgical	technique	for	use	in	patello-femoral	joint	replacement.

Zimmer	Patient	Specific	Instruments.		In	late	2009,	a	510(k)	Application	for	the	Zimmer	Patient	Specific	Instruments	was	approved	by	the	U.S.	Food	and	Drug	Administration	(FDA).	The	Zimmer	Patient	Specific Instruments	simplify	a	total	knee	procedure	and	help	enhance	appropriate	placement	of	the	final	implant	based	on	a	surgeon's	preoperative	surgical	plan.	Based	on	a	patient's	MRI	scan,	a	computer	generated,	custom	guide	is	produced	to conform	to	a	patient's	unique	knee	anatomy.	This	guide	is	then	utilized	intraoperatively	to	aid	in	the	surgical	correction	of	the	patient's	knee.

Zimmer	Segmental	System.		Adding	to	our	broad	portfolio	of	revision	options,	the	Zimmer	Segmental	System	is	a	comprehensive	system	designed	to	address	patients	with	severe	bone	loss	associated	with	disease,	trauma	or revision.	This	important	addition	realizes	our	strategic	goal	of	expanding	our	product	solutions	across	the	continuum	of	care	and,	with	the	incorporation	of	Trabecular	Metal	Technology,	expands	the	possibilities	for	treatment,	short	and	long term	fixation	and	stability.

# Hip	Implants

Total	hip	replacement	surgeries	replace	both	the	head	of	the	femur	and	the	socket	portion	of	the	pelvis	(acetabulum)	of	the	natural	hip.	Hip	procedures	include	first	time,	or	primary,	joint	replacement	as	well	as	revision	procedures. Approximately	30	percent	of	hip	implant	procedures	involve	the	use	of	bone	cement	to	attach	or	affix	the	prosthetic	components	to	the	surrounding	bone.	The	remaining	are	press-fit	into	bone,	which	means	that	they	have	a	surface	that	bone affixes	to	through	either	ongrowth	or	ingrowth	technologies.

Our	portfolio	of	MIS	Techniques	includes	the	Zimmer	MIS	Anterior	Supine	Technique,	the	MIS	Posterior	Procedure,	the	Zimmer	MIS	Anterolateral	Technique	and	MIS	2-IncisionTM	Hip	Replacement	Procedure.	The	MIS	Techniques are	designed	to	be	less	invasive	to	soft	tissues	and	to	shorten	recovery	time.

# Our	key	hip	replacement	products	include:

Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Hip	Prosthesis	with	Kinectiv®	Technology.	The	Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Hip	Prosthesis	offers	a	proximally	porous-coated	wedge-shaped	design	based	on	long	term	clinically	proven	concepts.	The	M/L	Taper has	become	widely	used	in	MIS	Procedures	due	to	several	key	design	features.	The	Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Hip	Prosthesis	with	Kinectiv	Technology	is	a	system	of	modular	stem	and	neck	components	designed	to	help	the	surgeon	restore	the natural	hip	joint	center	intraoperatively	by	addressing	the	key	variables	of	leg	length,	offset	and	version	independently.

Alloclassic®	(Zweymüller®)	Hip	System.		The	Alloclassic	(Zweymüller)	Hip	System	has	become	one	of	the	most	used,	primary,	cementless	hip	systems	in	the	world.	This	is	one	of	the	few	stems	available	today	that	is practically	unchanged	since	its	introduction	in	1979.	A	new	offset	design	was	added	in	2004	and	offers	the	surgeon	increased	capability	to	restore	the	patient's	anatomical	joint	movement.

CLS®	Spotorno®	Hip	System.		The	CLS	Spotorno	Stem	is	one	of	our	largest	selling	hip	prostheses,	especially	in	the	European	markets.	Additions	to	the	product	line	provide	the	capability	for	restoration	of	the	physiological center	of	rotation.	The	CLS	Spotorno	Stem	has	excellent	clinical	results,	confirmed	by	the	2006	Swedish	Hip	Registry.

Fitmore®	Hip	Stem.		The	Fitmore	Hip	Stem	was	released	in	2008	and	offers	the	surgeon	a	short,	bone	preserving	stem.	Maintaining	bone	stock	is	particularly	important	for	patients	who	may	undergo	a	later	revision procedure.	Its	unique	shape	facilitates	MIS	procedures,	especially	the	MIS	Anterior	Supine	approach	which	is	gaining	in	popularity.

VerSys®	Hip	System.		The	VerSys	Hip	System	is	supported	by	a	common	instrumentation	set	and	is	an	integrated	family	of	hip	products	with	design-specific	options	to	meet	varying	surgical	philosophies	and	patient	needs.	A unique	offering	within	the	VerSys	Hip	System,	the	VerSys	Epoch®	Fullcoat	Hip	System	is	the	first	reduced-stiffness	stem	specifically	designed	to	address	varying	patient	femoral	anatomies	and	minimize	implant-related	complications	such as	thigh	pain,	bone	resorption	and	leg	lengthening.

ContinuumTM	Acetabular	System,	Trilogy®	IT	Acetabular	System	and	Allofit®	IT	Alloclassic®	Acetabular	System.		These	systems	were	released	in	2009	and	each	acetabular	system	offers	the	surgeon	a	choice	of	advanced bearing	options	to	meet	the	clinical	and	lifestyle	needs	of	each	patient.	Bearing	options	include	Longevity®	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene,	Metasul®	Metal-on-Metal	Technology	and	a	BIOLOX®1	delta	ceramic-on-ceramic	(where Zimmer	has	regulatory	clearances).	The	acetabular	systems	also	provide	surgeons	a	choice	of	fixation	method	that	accommodates	their	surgical	philosophy.

Zimmer	MMCTM	Cup.		The	Zimmer	MMC	Cup	is	an	acetabular	implant	featuring	Metasul	Metal-on-Metal	Technology	and	a	hemispherical	design	that	offers	familiar	handling	for	surgeons.	This	system	was	released	in	2009. It	is	used	with	Metasul	Large	Diameter	Heads,	which	are	designed	to	provide	increased	range	of	motion	and	reduced	probability	of	dislocation,	making	this	implant	an	option	for	active	patients.

Trilogy®	Acetabular	System.		The	Trilogy	Acetabular	System,	with	its	titanium	alloy	shell,	fiber	metal	mesh	ingrowth	surface	and	Longevity	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene	Liners,	is	our	most	widely	sold	acetabular	cup system.

We	offer	the	Trabecular	Metal	Modular	Acetabular	System,	which	incorporates	design	features	from	the	Trilogy	family	of	acetabular	shells	augmented	with	the	advanced	fixation	surface	of	Trabecular	Metal	material.	In addition	to	the	Trabecular	Metal	Acetabular	System,	we	also	offer	a	Trabecular	Metal	Acetabular	Revision	System	that	provides	the	surgeon	with	a	variety	of	off-the-shelf	options	to	address	a	wide	range	of	bone	deficiencies	encountered during	acetabular	revisions	and	to	achieve	a	stable	construct.

# 1	Registered	trademark	of	CeramTec	AG

# Extremity	Implants

Our	extremity	portfolio,	primarily	shoulder	and	elbow	products,	is	designed	to	treat	arthritic	conditions,	soft	tissue	injuries	and	fractures,	as	well	as	to	enhance	the	outcome	of	primary	or	revision	surgery.

# Our	key	products	include:

Bigliani/Flatow®	Complete	Shoulder	Solution	Family.		The	Bigliani/Flatow	product	line	combined	with	the	Trabecular	Metal	Humeral	Stem	gives	us	a	significant	presence	in	the	global	shoulder	implant	market.

Trabecular	Metal	Glenoid.		The	Trabecular	Metal	Glenoid	offers	surgeons	a	glenoid	component	designed	to	improve	fixation.	Trabecular	Metal's	material	properties	allow	for	more	normal	bone	formation	and	maintenance.

Trabecular	Metal	Reverse	Shoulder	System.		The	Trabecular	Metal	Reverse	Shoulder	System	incorporates	advanced	materials	and	design	to	offer	improved	biological	ingrowth	potential	through	the	utilization	of	Trabecular Metal	Technology,	while	addressing	significant	loss	of	rotator	cuff	function.	The	reverse	shoulder	system	is	designed	to	restore	function	to	patients	who,	because	of	debilitating	rotator	cuff	tears,	are	not	candidates	for	traditional	shoulder surgery	and	have	exhausted	other	means	of	repair.

Anatomical	ShoulderTM	System.		The	Anatomical	Shoulder	System	can	be	adjusted	to	each	patient's	individual	anatomy.	This	portfolio	of	products	was	further	expanded	to	include	the	Anatomical	Shoulder	Inverse/Reverse System,	designed	to	address	significant	loss	of	rotator	cuff	function,	and	the	Anatomical	Shoulder	Fracture	System.	Both	the	primary	and	fracture	shoulder	implants	can	be	converted	to	a	reverse	shoulder	without	removal	of	the	initial implant.

Coonrad/Morrey	Total	Elbow.	The	Coonrad/Morrey	Total	Elbow	product	line	is	a	family	of	elbow	replacement	implant	products	to	address	patients	with	conditions	of	severe	arthritis	or	trauma.	It	remains	the	largest	elbow franchise	in	the	world.

# Dental	Implants

Our	dental	products	division	manufactures	and	distributes:	(1)	dental	reconstructive	implants	—	for	individuals	who	are	totally	without	teeth	or	are	missing	one	or	more	teeth;	(2)	dental	restorative	products	—	aimed	at	providing	a more	natural	restoration	to	mimic	the	original	teeth;	and	(3)	dental	regenerative	products	—	for	soft	tissue	and	bone	rehabilitation.

# Dental	Reconstructive	Implants

Our	dental	reconstructive	implant	products	and	surgical	and	restorative	techniques	include:

Tapered	Screw-Vent®	Implant	System.		Our	highest	selling	dental	product	line	provides	the	clinician	a	tapered	geometry	which	mimics	the	natural	shape	of	a	tooth	root.	The	Tapered	Screw-Vent	System,	with	its	two-stage design,	was	developed	to	minimize	valuable	chair	time	for	restorations.	Featuring	a	proprietary	internal	hex	connection,	multiple	lead	threads	for	reduced	insertion	time	and	selective	surface	coatings,	the	Tapered	Screw-Vent	Product	is	a technologically	advanced	dental	implant	offering	features	designed	to	allow	the	clinician	to	meet	the	needs	of	patients.	The	Zimmer	One-Piece	Implant	System,	designed	to	complement	the	success	of	the	Tapered	Screw-Vent	System, enhances	this	product	line	by	offering	clinicians	a	fast,	convenient	restorative	option.

AdVent®	Implant	System.		Utilizing	many	features	of	the	Tapered	Screw-Vent	System,	the	AdVent	Product	is	a	transgingival,	one	stage	design	that	utilizes	the	same	surgical	system	as	the	Tapered	Screw-Vent	System, allowing	the	clinician	to	use	both	design	concepts	without	incurring	the	added	cost	of	a	second	surgical	system.

Tapered	SwissPlus®	Implant	System.		Designed	to	meet	the	needs	of	clinicians	who	prefer	a	transgingival,	one	stage,	dental	implant,	the	Tapered	SwissPlus	System	incorporates	multiple	lead	threads	for	faster	insertion	time and	a	tapered	body	to	allow	it	to	be	placed	in	tight	interdental	spaces.	The	Tapered	SwissPlus	System	also	incorporates	an	internal	connection.

# Dental	Restorative	Products

We	commercialize	products	for	the	aesthetic	market	aimed	at	providing	a	more	natural	restoration.	We	offer	a	full	line	of	prosthetic	devices	for	each	of	the	above	dental	implant	systems	as	well	as	a	custom	solution,	as	follows:

Zimmer	Hex-Lock®	Contour	Abutment	and	Restorative	Products.	Designed	to	be	used	with	our	Tapered	Screw-Vent	and	One-Piece	Implant	Systems,	our	contour	lines	are	a	solution	for	addressing	the	diversity	of	patients' needs.	Featuring	prepared	margins,	titanium	and	ceramic	options	and	snap-on	impression	caps,	our	abutments	are	designed	to	simplify	the	restoration	process,	save	time	for	clinicians	and	technicians	and	offer	versatility.

During	2009,	we	released	our	new	Hex-Lock	Short	Abutment	and	Restorative	System,	an	all-inclusive	system	that	promotes	posterior	restorations,	as	well	as	the	Zimmer	Contour	Angled	Zirconia	Abutment	engineered	for use	with	the	Tapered	Screw-Vent	implants	to	provide	clinicians	with	a	restorative	solution	for	patients'	esthetic	needs.

# Dental	Regenerative	Products

We	market	the	following	product	lines	for	use	in	regenerative	techniques	in	oral	surgery:

Puros®	Allograft	Products.		The	Puros	Material	is	an	allograft	material	which	in	the	case	of	mineralized	bone	and	dermal	tissues	utilizes	the	Tutoplast®2	Tissue	Processing	Technique	that	provides	exceptional	bone	and	soft tissue	grafting	material	for	use	in	oral	surgery.	Zimmer	Dental

2	Registered	trademark	of	RTI	Biologics,	Inc.

offers	seven	distinct	Puros	Allograft	products	to	use	together	or	separately	for	various	bone	and	soft	tissue	grafting	needs:	Puros	Cancellous	Particulate,	Puros	Cortical	Particulate,	Puros	Block	Allografts,	Puros	Pericardium	Membranes, Puros	Dermis	Membranes	and,	in	2009,	we	extended	our	Puros	portfolio	by	adding	Puros	Demineralized	Bone	Matrix	(DBM)	and	Puros	DBM	Putty	with	Chips.	We	market	the	Puros	Allograft	Products	through	an	agreement	with	RTI Biologics,	Inc.

Through	this	same	agreement	with	RTI	Biologics,	Inc.,	we	provide	CopiOs®	Pericardium	Membrane	in	the	United	States.	Sourced	from	bovine	pericardial	tissue,	CopiOs	Pericardium	Membrane	provides	the	characteristics of	natural	tissue	and	can	be	used	as	a	direct	substitute	for	Puros	Pericardium	Membranes.

In	addition,	we	extended	our	regenerative	portfolio	further	in	wound	management	by	adding	the	HemCon®3	Dental	Dressing,	an	advanced	wound	dressing	material	that	utilizes	a	propriety	chitosan-based	technology	to effectively	seal	the	wound	and	minimize	pain	in	various	surgical	procedures.	The	HemCon	Dental	Dressing	is	exclusively	distributed	by	Zimmer	Dental.	In	2009,	we	also	introduced	our	Zimmer	Sinus	Lift	Balloon,	created	to	simplify	the delicate	sinus	lift	procedure	under	an	agreement	with	Osseous	Technologies	of	America	(OTA).

# Spine	Implants

Our	Spine	products	division	designs,	manufactures	and	distributes	medical	devices	and	surgical	instruments	to	deliver	comprehensive	solutions	for	those	with	back	or	neck	pain	caused	by	degenerative	conditions,	deformities	or traumatic	injury	of	the	spine.	We	provide	surgeons	a	broad	range	of	technologies	for	posterior	and	anterior	procedures	in	the	cervical,	thoracic	and	lumbar	regions	of	the	spine.

Zimmer	Spine's	portfolio	of	spinal	solutions	includes:

Dynesys®	Dynamic	Stabilization	System.		The	Dynesys	family	of	implants	was	designed	to	facilitate	a	more	physiologic	approach	to	low	back	spinal	stabilization.	The	system	threads	flexible	components,	instead	of traditional	rigid	titanium	rods,	through	pedicle	screws	in	order	to	stabilize	affected	spinal	segments	in	a	more	natural	anatomic	position	and	to	alleviate	pain.	The	Dynesys	Dynamic	Stabilization	System	is	currently	indicated	for	use	as	an adjunct	to	fusion	in	the	U.S.

PathFinder®	Minimally	Invasive	Pedicle	Screw	System.		A	pioneering	technology	in	MIS,	the	PathFinder	System	is	a	posterior	stabilization	system	used	in	fusion	procedures	of	the	lumbar	and	thoracic	spine.	The	system easily	facilitates	single	or	multi-level	procedures	while	featuring	reduction,	compression	and	distraction	capabilities.

Universal	Clamp®	Spinal	Fixation	System.		The	innovative	design	of	the	Universal	Clamp	implant	allows	it	to	be	used	alongside	traditional	hooks,	screws	and	wires	to	treat	scoliotic	deformities	and	correct	complex	spinal pathologies.

Sequoia®	Pedicle	Screw	System.		The	Sequoia	System	was	developed	to	simplify	surgical	flow,	reduce	implantation	time	and	improve	ergonomic	tool	design.	This	advanced	pedicle	screw	system	combines	ergonomic instrumentation	with	an	effective	design	that	reduces	implant	metal	volume.

Ardis®	Interbody	System.		The	Ardis	implant	features	a	self-distracting	nose,	convex	geometry	and	wide	range	of	sizes.	This	versatile	PEEK-OPTIMA®4	device	incorporates	a	large	space	for	graft	placement,	plus	an advanced	tooth	design	to	effectively	resist	migration	and	expulsion	during	procedures.	Ardis	instrumentation	was	also	designed	to	streamline	the	surgical	procedure	and	improve	surgeon	comfort.

Trinica®	Select	Anterior	Cervical	Plating	System.		The	Trinica	Select	System	is	designed	to	simplify	the	surgical	procedure	with	the	Secure-Twist®	anti-migration	system,	which	provides	visual	confirmation	of	screw capture,	as	well	as	a	wide	variety	of	screw	options	to	customize	the	construct	depending	on	patient	need.

Biological	Products.		Zimmer	Spine	offers	a	full	line	of	bone	void	filler	products	to	accommodate	most	surgical	procedures.	Puros®	Demineralized	Bone	Matrix	is	available	in	Putty	and	Putty	with	Chips	formulations,	and the	CopiOs®	Bone	Void	Filler	family	of	products	includes	synthetic	bone	graft	material	in	the	form	of	sponges	or	pastes	that	are	used	to	fill	bone	voids	during	spine	surgery.

Wallis®	Posterior	Dynamic	Stabilization	System	(available	outside	the	U.S.	only).		The	Wallis	system	is	an	innovative	spinal	implant	that	was	designed	to	stabilize	the	lumbar	spine	while	preserving	the	anatomy	and minimizing	the	need	for	bony	resection.	The	Wallis	system	combines	a	PEEK-OPTIMA	spacer	linked	to	the	vertebrae	via	a	polyester	band	that	permits	an	even	distribution	of	stresses	on	bone.

# Trauma

Trauma	products	include	devices	used	to	stabilize	damaged	or	broken	bones	and	their	surrounding	tissues	to	support	the	body's	natural	healing	processes.	Fractures	are	most	often	stabilized	using	internal	fixation	devices	such	as plates,	screws,	nails,	wires	and	pins,	but	may	also	be	stabilized	using	external	fixation	devices.	Orthobiologics	are	used	in	conjunction	with	traditional	trauma	devices	to	encourage	healing	and	replace	bone	lost	during	an	injury.	We	are focused	on	providing	exceptional	options	to	treat	a	broad	range	of	traumatic	injuries,	addressing	unmet	clinical	needs

3	Registered	trademark	of	HemCon	Medical	Technologies,	Inc.

4	Registered	trademark	of	Victrex	PLC	Corporation,	United	Kingdom

and	implementing	next-generation	technologies	into	our	portfolio	of	trauma	solutions.

Zimmer	Trauma	offers	a	comprehensive	line	of	products,	including:

Zimmer	Natural	NailTM	System.		The	Zimmer	Natural	Nail	System	includes	a	series	of	intramedullary	nails	designed	to	address	a	broad	range	of	long	bone	fractures.	The	nails	are	anatomically	shaped	and	incorporate	an innovative	feature	that	allows	the	screws	to	be	linked	to	the	nails,	creating	a	robust	construct	even	in	poor	quality	bone.	Instrumentation	for	nail	placement	is	designed	to	make	it	easy	for	surgeons	to	utilize	the	implants	as	well	as	to	address growing	concerns	with	obesity	and	osteoporosis.

NCB®	Polyaxial	Locking	Plate	System.		NCB	Polyaxial	Locking	Plates	provide	surgeons	with	the	ability	to	place	screws	with	polyaxial	freedom	and	utilize	both	conventional	and	locking	technology	in	the	treatment	of complex	fractures	of	the	distal	femur,	proximal	humerus	and	proximal	tibia.	We	continue	to	invest	in	additional	applications	of	this	exciting	technology.

Zimmer	Periarticular	Locking	Plate	System.		The	Zimmer	Periarticular	Locking	Plate	System	combines	advanced,	anatomic	designs	with	locking	screw	technology	to	create	constructs	for	use	in	comminuted	fractures	or where	deficient	bone	stock	or	poor	bone	quality	is	encountered.	By	combining	locking	screw	holes	with	compression	slots,	the	plates	can	be	used	as	both	locking	devices	and	fracture	compression	devices.

Zimmer	Universal	Locking	System.		The	Zimmer	Universal	Locking	System	is	a	comprehensive	system	of	mini	and	small	fragment	plates,	screws	and	instruments	for	fracture	fixation.	The	Universal	Locking	System	plates resemble	standard	plates,	but	have	figure-8	shaped	holes	which	allow	the	plates	to	be	used	as	compression	plates,	locked	internal	fixators	or	as	an	internal	fixation	system	combining	both	techniques.

Zimmer	Cable-Ready®	System.		The	Zimmer	Cable-Ready	System	includes	a	series	of	instruments,	cables	and	other	implants	that	help	a	surgeon	treat	several	different	fracture	types,	including	those	that	occur	around	a previously	implanted	device	(periprosthetic).	The	cables	are	wrapped	around	the	bone	and	then	secured,	either	to	themselves	or	to	plates,	to	provide	fixation	for	fractured	limbs.

# Orthopaedic	Surgical	Products

We	develop,	manufacture	and	market	products	that	support	our	reconstructive,	trauma,	spine	and	dental	implant	procedures	in	the	peri-operative	environment,	with	a	focus	on	Bone	Cements,	Surgical	Wound	Site	Management	and Blood	Management.	Orthopaedic	Surgical	Products	include:

PALACOS®5	Bone	Cement.		We	have	exclusive	United	States	distribution	rights	for	the	PALACOS	line	of	bone	cement	products	manufactured	by	Heraeus	Kulzer	GmbH.	Included	in	these	brands	are	PALACOS	R	and PALACOS	R+G	Bone	Cements,	as	well	as	PALACOS	LV	and	PALACOS	LV+G	Bone	Cements.	The	PALACOS	R+G	and	PALACOS	LV+G	products	are	bone	cements	with	the	antibiotic	gentamiacin	pre-mixed	in	the	formulation;	both	are used	by	orthopaedic	surgeons	to	reduce	the	risk	of	postoperative	infection	in	second	stage	revisions.	These	products	have	handling	characteristics	that	make	them	well-suited	for	minimally	invasive	procedures.

Hi-FatigueTM6	Bone	Cement.		We	have	exclusive	European	and	Asian	distribution	rights	for	the	Hi-Fatigue	line	of	bone	cement	products	manufactured	by	aap	Biomaterials	GmbH.	Included	in	these	brands	are	Hi-Fatigue and	Hi-Fatigue	G	Bone	Cements.	The	Hi-Fatigue	G	bone	cement	utilizes	the	antibiotic	gentamiacin	pre-mixed	in	the	formulation	and	is	used	by	orthopaedic	surgeons	to	reduce	the	risk	of	postoperative	infection.

A.T.S.®	Automatic	Tourniquet	Systems.		The	A.T.S.		Tourniquet	Systems	Product	Line	is	a	family	of	tourniquet	machines	and	cuffs	designed	to	safely	create	a	bloodless	surgical	field.	The	portfolio	includes	the	A.T.S.	3000 Tourniquet	System,	which	utilizes	proprietary	technology	to	determine	a	patient's	proper	"Limb	Occlusion	Pressure"	(LOP)	based	on	the	patient's	specific	physiology.	A	decrease	in	LOP	may	reduce	tissue	or	nerve	damage.	The	range	of cuffs	which	complement	the	machines	provides	the	flexibility	to	occlude	blood	flow	safely	with	convenience	and	accuracy	for	limbs	of	virtually	every	size	and	shape.

Pulsavac®	Plus,	Pulsavac	Plus	AC	and	Pulsavac	Plus	LP	Wound	Debridement	System.		These	Pulsavac	Systems	are	used	for	cleaning	and	debridement	of	contaminants	and	foreign	matter	from	wounds	using	simultaneous irrigation	and	suction.	All	three	Pulsavac	Systems	are	completely	disposable	to	reduce	the	risk	of	cross	contamination.	While	Pulsavac	Plus	and	Pulsavac	Plus	LP	Wound	Debridement	Systems	are	both	battery-powered,	the	Pulsavac	Plus AC	Wound	Debridement	System	is	a	disposable	system	that	is	powered	by	a	reusable	AC	power	source	to	address	battery	disposal	concerns.

Zimmer	Blood	Reinfusion	System	(ZBRS)	and	Hemovac®	Blood	Management	Systems.		These	two	blood	management	systems	are	part	of	a	larger	family	that	supports	the	clinician	in	managing	patient	blood	loss	after	the surgical	procedure.	The	ZBRS	product	is	a	closed-loop	postoperative	system	that	effectively	salvages	and	filters	the	patient's	own	blood,	which	can	help	reduce	the	dependency	on	banked	blood	and/or	preoperative	autologous	donation.

# HEALTHCARE	CONSULTING

Our	healthcare	consulting	services	subsidiary,	Accelero	Health	Partners,	LLC	(Accelero),	is	based	in	Canonsburg,

5	Registered	trademark	of	Heraeus	Kulzer	GmbH

6	Registered	trademark	of	aap	Biomaterials	GmbH	&	Co.	KG

ZIMMER	HOLDINGS,	INC. 2009	FORM	10-K	ANNUAL	REPORT

Pennsylvania.	Accelero	consultants	work	to	design	a	customized	program	for	each	client	that	promotes	the	active	participation	and	collaboration	of	the	physicians	and	the	hospital-based	departments	with	the	goal	of	consistently	producing	a superior	outcome	in	the	form	of	a	growing,	efficient,	and	effective	care	delivery	network.	Currently,	revenue	related	to	Accelero	represents	less	than	1	percent	of	our	total	net	sales.

# ORTHOBIOLOGICS

Our	research	and	development	efforts	include	an	Orthobiologics	group	based	in	Austin,	Texas,	with	its	own	full-time	staff	and	dedicated	projects	centralizing	on	the	development	of	a	variety	of	biologic	technologies	for musculoskeletal	applications.	This	group	works	on	biological	solutions	to	repair	and	regenerate	damaged	or	degenerated	musculoskeletal	tissues	using	biomaterials/cell	therapies	which	offer	the	possibility	of	treating	damaged	joints	by biological	repair	rather	than	replacing	them.	A	sampling	of	some	of	our	key	projects	in	the	Orthobiologics	area	is	set	forth	below.

We	are	collaborating	with	ISTO	Technologies,	Inc.	(ISTO)	to	develop	chondral	and	osteochondral	grafts	for	cartilage	repair.	ISTO	creates	cell-based	therapies	for	cartilage	regeneration	using	cells	from	juvenile	donor	cartilage. DeNovo	ET	Engineered	Tissue	Graft	is	a	living	tissue-engineered	cartilage	graft	under	clinical	investigation	for	the	restoration	of	cartilage	defects,	reestablishment	of	joint	function	and	relief	of	pain	in	the	knee.	The	Phase	I/II	clinical	trial for	DeNovo	ET	has	been	completed	and	the	data	has	been	supplied	to	the	FDA	with	a	request	to	allow	Zimmer/ISTO	to	proceed	with	enrollment	with	the	pivotal	Phase	III	clinical	trial.	In	addition,	we	completed	the	full	launch	of	our	first cartilage	repair	product,	DeNovo	NT	Natural	Tissue	Graft,	in	2009.	This	product	provides	particulated	juvenile	cartilage	tissue	for	repair	of	articular	cartilage	defects	of	the	knee,	ankle,	shoulder,	hip,	elbow	and	toe	joints.	More	than 700	patients	have	undergone	this	innovative	cartilage	repair	procedure.

Many	musculoskeletal	surgical	procedures	use	bone	grafts	to	help	regenerate	lost	or	damaged	bone.	Our	Spine,	Dental	and	Trauma	divisions	have	introduced	a	technologically	advanced	all-human	demineralized	bone	matrix,	Puros DBM	Putty	and	Putty	with	bone	chips.	This	bone-derived	allograft	material	is	used	to	fill	bone	voids	or	defects.	It	is	placed	into	the	bone	void	where	it	is	then	completely	replaced	by	natural	bone	during	the	healing	process.

# RESEARCH	AND	DEVELOPMENT

We	have	extensive	research	and	development	activities	to	develop	new	surgical	techniques,	materials,	orthobiologics	and	product	designs.	The	research	and	development	functions	work	closely	with	our	strategic	brand	marketing function.	The	rapid	commercialization	of	innovative	new	materials,	orthobiologics	products,	implant	and	instrument	designs	and	surgical	techniques	remains	one	of	our	core	strategies	and	continues	to	be	an	important	driver	of	sales	growth.

We	are	broadening	our	product	offerings	in	each	of	the	product	categories	and	exploring	new	technologies	with	possible	applications	in	multiple	areas.	For	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007,	we	spent $205.4	million,	$192.3	million	and	$182.6	million,	respectively,	on	research	and	development.	Our	primary	research	and	development	facility	is	located	in	Warsaw,	Indiana.	We	have	other	research	and	development	personnel	based	in, among	other	places,	Winterthur,	Switzerland;	Austin,	Texas;	Minneapolis,	Minnesota;	Carlsbad,	California;	Dover,	Ohio;	and	Parsippany,	New	Jersey.	As	of	December	31,	2009,	we	employed	more	than	800	research	and	development employees	worldwide.

We	expect	to	continue	to	identify	innovative	technologies	and	consider	acquiring	complementary	products	or	businesses,	or	establishing	technology	licensing	arrangements	or	strategic	alliances.

# GOVERNMENT	REGULATION	AND	COMPLIANCE

We	are	subject	to	government	regulation	in	the	countries	in	which	we	conduct	business.	In	the	U.S.,	numerous	laws	and	regulations	govern	all	the	processes	by	which	medical	devices	are	brought	to	market.	These	include,	among others,	the	Federal	Food,	Drug	and	Cosmetic	Act	and	regulations	issued	or	promulgated	thereunder.	The	FDA	has	enacted	regulations	that	control	all	aspects	of	the	development,	manufacture,	advertising,	promotion	and	postmarket surveillance	of	medical	products,	including	medical	devices.	In	addition,	the	FDA	controls	the	access	of	products	to	market	through	processes	designed	to	ensure	that	only	products	that	are	safe	and	effective	are	made	available	to	the	public.

Most	of	our	new	products	fall	into	FDA	classifications	that	require	the	submission	of	a	Premarket	Notification	(510(k))	to	the	FDA.	This	process	requires	us	to	demonstrate	that	the	device	to	be	marketed	is	at	least	as	safe	and	effective as,	that	is,	substantially	equivalent	to,	a	legally	marketed	device.	We	must	submit	information	that	supports	our	substantial	equivalency	claims.	Before	we	can	market	the	new	device,	we	must	receive	an	order	from	the	FDA	finding substantial	equivalence	and	clearing	the	new	device	for	commercial	distribution	in	the	United	States.	Other	devices	we	develop	and	market	are	in	a	category	(class)	for	which	the	FDA	has	implemented	stringent	clinical	investigation	and Premarket	Approval	(PMA)	requirements.	The	PMA	process	requires	us	to	provide	clinical	and	laboratory	data	that	establishes	that	the	new	medical	device	is	safe	and	effective.	The	FDA	will	approve	the	new	device	for	commercial distribution	if	it	determines	that	the	data	and	information	in	the	PMA	constitute	valid	scientific	evidence	and	that	there	is	reasonable	assurance	that	the	device	is	safe	and	effective	for	its	intended	use(s).	All	of	our	devices	marketed	in	the United	States	have	been	cleared	or	approved	by	the	FDA,	with	the	exception	of	certain	pre-amendment	devices	which	were	in	commercial	distribution	prior	to	May	28,	1976.	The	FDA	has	grandfathered	these	devices,	so	new	FDA submissions	are	not	required.	The	FDA	has	the	authority	to:	halt	the	distribution	of	certain	medical	devices;	detain	or	seize	adulterated	or

misbranded	medical	devices;	or	order	the	repair,	replacement	or	refund	of	the	costs	of	such	devices.	There	are	also	certain	requirements	of	state,	local	and	foreign	governments	that	we	must	comply	with	in	the	manufacture	and	marketing	of our	products.

In	many	of	the	foreign	countries	in	which	we	market	our	products,	we	are	subject	to	local	regulations	affecting,	among	other	things,	design	and	product	standards,	packaging	requirements	and	labeling	requirements.	Many	of	the regulations	applicable	to	our	devices	and	products	in	these	countries	are	similar	to	those	of	the	FDA.	The	member	countries	of	the	European	Union	have	adopted	the	European	Medical	Device	Directive,	which	creates	a	single	set	of	medical device	regulations	for	products	marketed	in	all	member	countries.	Compliance	with	the	Medical	Device	Directive	and	certification	to	a	quality	system	enable	the	manufacturer	to	place	a	CE	mark	on	its	products.	To	obtain	authorization	to affix	the	CE	mark	to	a	product,	a	recognized	European	Notified	Body	must	assess	a	manufacturer's	quality	systems	and	the	product's	conformity	to	the	requirements	of	the	Medical	Device	Directive.	We	are	subject	to	inspection	by	the Notified	Bodies	for	compliance	with	these	requirements.

Further,	we	are	subject	to	various	federal	and	state	laws	concerning	healthcare	fraud	and	abuse,	including	false	claims	laws	and	anti-kickback	laws.	These	laws	are	administered	by,	among	others,	the	U.S.	Department	of	Justice,	the Office	of	Inspector	General	of	the	Department	of	Health	and	Human	Services	and	state	attorneys	general.	Many	of	these	agencies	have	increased	their	enforcement	activities	with	respect	to	medical	device	manufacturers	in	recent	years.

Violations	of	these	laws	are	punishable	by	criminal	and/or	civil	sanctions,	including,	in	some	instances,	fines,	imprisonment	and,	within	the	United	States,	exclusion	from	participation	in	government	healthcare	programs,	including	Medicare, Medicaid	and	Veterans	Administration	(VA)	health	programs.

Our	operations	in	foreign	countries	are	subject	to	the	extraterritorial	application	of	the	U.S.	Foreign	Corrupt	Practices	Act	(FCPA).	As	part	of	our	global	compliance	program,	we	seek	to	address	FCPA	risks	proactively.

Our	facilities	and	operations	are	also	subject	to	complex	federal,	state,	local	and	foreign	environmental	and	occupational	safety	laws	and	regulations,	including	those	relating	to	discharges	of	substances	in	the	air,	water	and	land,	the handling,	storage	and	disposal	of	wastes	and	the	clean-up	of	properties	by	pollutants.	We	do	not	expect	that	the	ongoing	costs	of	compliance	with	these	environmental	requirements	will	have	a	material	impact	on	our	consolidated	earnings, capital	expenditures	or	competitive	position.

# COMPETITION

The	orthopaedics	industry	is	highly	competitive.	In	the	global	markets	for	reconstructive	implants,	trauma	and	related	surgical	products,	our	major	competitors	include:	DePuy	Orthopaedics,	Inc.	(a	subsidiary	of	Johnson	&	Johnson), Stryker	Corporation,	Biomet,	Inc.,	Smith	&	Nephew	plc,	Wright	Medical	Group,	Inc.,	Synthes,	Inc.	and	Tornier,	Inc.

In	the	Americas	geographic	segment,	we	and	DePuy	Orthopaedics,	Inc.,	Stryker	Corporation,	Biomet,	Inc.,	Smith	&	Nephew,	Inc.	(a	subsidiary	of	Smith	&	Nephew	plc),	Wright	Medical	Group,	Inc.	and	Synthes,	Inc.	account	for	a large	majority	of	the	total	reconstructive	and	trauma	implant	sales.

In	the	Asia	Pacific	market	for	reconstructive	implant	and	trauma	products,	we	compete	primarily	with	DePuy	Orthopaedics,	Inc.,	Stryker	Corporation,	Synthes,	Inc.	and	Smith	&	Nephew	plc,	as	well	as	regional	companies,	including Japan	Medical	Materials	Corporation	and	Japan	Medical	Dynamic	Marketing,	Inc.	Factors,	such	as	the	dealer	system	and	complex	regulatory	environments,	make	it	difficult	for	smaller	companies,	particularly	those	that	are	non-regional,	to compete	effectively	with	the	market	leaders	in	the	Asia	Pacific	region.

The	European	reconstructive	implant	and	trauma	product	markets	are	more	fragmented	than	the	Americas	or	the	Asia	Pacific	segments.	The	variety	of	philosophies	held	by	European	surgeons	regarding	hip	reconstruction,	for example,	has	fostered	the	existence	of	many	regional	European	companies,	including	Aesculap	AG	(a	subsidiary	of	B.	Braun),	Waldemar	LINK	GmbH	&	Co.,	KG	and	Mathys	AG	which,	in	addition	to	the	global	competitors,	compete	with us.	Today	most	hip	implants	sold	in	Europe	are	products	developed	specifically	for	the	European	market,	although	global	products	are	gaining	acceptance.	We	will	continue	to	develop	and	produce	specially	tailored	products	to	meet	specific European	needs.

In	the	spinal	implant	category,	we	compete	globally	primarily	with	the	spinal	and	biologic	business	of	Medtronic,	Inc.,	DePuy	Spine	(a	subsidiary	of	Johnson	&	Johnson),	Synthes,	Inc.,	Stryker	Corporation,	Biomet	Trauma	and Biomet	Spine	(subsidiaries	of	Biomet,	Inc.)	and	NuVasive,	Inc.

In	the	dental	implant	category,	we	compete	primarily	with	Nobel	Biocare	Holding	AG,	Straumann	Holding	AG,	Astra	Tech	Dental	and	Biomet	3i	(a	subsidiary	of	Biomet,	Inc.).

Competition	within	the	industry	is	primarily	based	on	technology,	innovation,	quality,	reputation	and	customer	service.	A	key	factor	in	our	continuing	success	in	the	future	will	be	our	ability	to	develop	new	products	and	improve existing	products	and	technologies.

# MANUFACTURING	AND	RAW	MATERIALS

We	manufacture	substantially	all	of	our	products	at	nine	sites	including	Warsaw,	Indiana;	Winterthur,	Switzerland;	Ponce,	Puerto	Rico;	Dover,	Ohio;	Statesville,	North	Carolina;	Carlsbad,	California;	Parsippany,	New	Jersey; Shannon,	Ireland;	and	Etupes,	France.

We	believe	that	our	manufacturing	facilities	are	among	the	best	in	our	industry	in	terms	of	automation	and	productivity	and	have	the	flexibility	to	accommodate	future	growth.	The	manufacturing	operations	at	these	facilities	are designed	to	incorporate	the	cellular	concept	for	production	and	to	implement	tenets	of	a	manufacturing	philosophy	focused	on	continuous	operational	improvement	and	optimization.	Our	continuous	improvement	efforts	are	driven	by	Lean and	Six	Sigma	methodologies.	In	addition,	at	certain

of	our	manufacturing	facilities,	many	of	the	employees	are	cross-trained	to	perform	a	broad	array	of	operations.

We	generally	target	operating	our	manufacturing	facilities	at	levels	up	to	90	percent	of	total	capacity.	We	continually	evaluate	the	potential	to	in-source	products	currently	purchased	from	outside	vendors	to	on-site	production.

We	have	improved	our	manufacturing	processes	to	protect	our	profitability	and	offset	the	impact	of	inflationary	costs.	We	have,	for	example,	employed	computer-assisted	robots	and	multi-axis	grinders	to	precision	polish	medical devices;	automated	certain	manufacturing	and	inspection	processes,	including	on-machine	inspection	and	process	controls;	purchased	state-of-the-art	equipment;	in-sourced	core	products,	such	as	castings	and	forgings;	and	negotiated reductions	in	third	party	supplier	costs.

We	use	a	diverse	and	broad	range	of	raw	materials	in	the	manufacturing	of	our	products.	We	purchase	all	of	our	raw	materials	and	select	components	used	in	manufacturing	our	products	from	external	suppliers.	In	addition,	we purchase	some	supplies	from	single	sources	for	reasons	of	quality	assurance,	sole	source	availability,	cost	effectiveness	or	constraints	resulting	from	regulatory	requirements.	We	work	closely	with	our	suppliers	to	assure	continuity	of	supply while	maintaining	high	quality	and	reliability.	To	date,	we	have	not	experienced	any	significant	difficulty	in	locating	and	obtaining	the	materials	necessary	to	fulfill	our	production	schedules.

# INTELLECTUAL	PROPERTY

Patents	and	other	proprietary	rights	are	important	to	the	continued	success	of	our	business.	We	also	rely	upon	trade	secrets,	know-how,	continuing	technological	innovation	and	licensing	opportunities	to	develop	and	maintain	our competitive	position.	We	protect	our	proprietary	rights	through	a	variety	of	methods,	including	confidentiality	agreements	and	proprietary	information	agreements	with	vendors,	employees,	consultants	and	others	who	may	have	access	to proprietary	information.	We	own	or	control	through	licensing	arrangements	more	than	4,000	issued	patents	and	patent	applications	throughout	the	world	that	relate	to	aspects	of	the	technology	incorporated	in	many	of	our	products.

# EMPLOYEES

We	employ	more	than	8,200	employees	worldwide,	including	more	than	800	employees	dedicated	to	research	and	development.	Approximately	4,900	employees	are	located	within	the	United	States	and	approximately 3,300	employees	are	located	outside	of	the	United	States,	primarily	throughout	Europe	and	in	Japan.	We	have	over	3,500	employees	dedicated	to	manufacturing	our	products	worldwide.	The	Warsaw,	Indiana	production	facility	employs more	than	1,600	employees.	Fewer	than	200	North	American	employees	are	members	of	a	trade	union	covered	by	a	collective	bargaining	agreement.

We	have	a	collective	bargaining	agreement	with	the	United	Steel,	Paper	and	Forestry,	Rubber	Manufacturing,	Energy,	Allied	Industrial	and	Service	Workers	International	Union	for	and	on	behalf	of	Local	2737-15	covering	employees at	the	Dover,	Ohio	facility,	which	continues	in	effect	until	May	15,	2012.

# EXECUTIVE	OFFICERS

The	following	table	sets	forth	certain	information	with	respect	to	our	executive	officers	as	of	February	15,	2010.

Bruno	A.	Melzi 62 Chairman,	Europe,	Middle	East	and	Africa

Stephen	H.L.	Ooi 56 President,	Asia	Pacific

Jeffrey	B.	Paulsen 48 Group	President,	Global	Businesses

Chad	F.	Phipps 38 Senior	Vice	President,	General	Counsel	and	Secretary

Mr.	Dvorak	was	appointed	President,	Chief	Executive	Officer	and	a	member	of	the	Board	of	Directors	of	Zimmer	Holdings	on	May	1,	2007.	From	December	2005	to	April	2007,	Mr.	Dvorak	served	as	Group	President,	Global	Businesses and	Chief	Legal	Officer.	From	October	2003	to	December	2005,	Mr.	Dvorak	served	as	Executive	Vice	President,	Corporate	Services,	Chief	Counsel	and	Secretary,	as	well	as	Chief	Compliance	Officer.	Mr.	Dvorak	was	appointed	Corporate Secretary	in	February	2003.	He	joined	Zimmer	Holdings	in	December	2001	as	Senior	Vice	President,	Corporate	Affairs	and	General	Counsel.

Dr.	Blanchard	was	appointed	Senior	Vice	President	and	Chief	Scientific	Officer	of	Zimmer	Holdings	in	December	2005.	She

is	responsible	for	Corporate	Research,	Global	Quality	and	Regulatory	Affairs,	Global	Medical	Affairs,	Biologics	Research	and	Development	and	Biologics	Marketing.	From	October	2003	to	December	2005,	Dr.	Blanchard	served	as	Vice President,	Corporate	Research	and	Clinical	Affairs	and	from	August	2002	to	October	2003,	she	served	as	Vice	President,	Research	and	Biologics.

Mr.	Crines	was	appointed	Executive	Vice	President,	Finance	and	Chief	Financial	Officer	of	Zimmer	Holdings	on	May	1,	2007.	From	December	2005	to	April	2007,	Mr.	Crines	served	as	Senior	Vice	President,	Finance,	Operations	and Corporate	Controller	and	Chief	Accounting	Officer.	From	October	2003	to	December	2005,	Mr.	Crines	served	as	Senior	Vice	President,	Finance/Controller	and	Information	Technology	and	from	July	2001	to	October	2003,	he	served	as Vice	President,	Finance/Controller.

Mr.	Davis	was	appointed	Vice	President,	Finance	and	Corporate	Controller	and	Chief	Accounting	Officer	of	Zimmer	Holdings	in	May	2007.	He	has	responsibility	for	internal	and	external	reporting,	planning	and	analysis,	and	corporate	and business	unit	accounting.	From	March	2006	to	May	2007,	Mr.	Davis	served	as	Director,	Financial	Planning	and	Accounting.	From	December	2003	to	March	2006,	Mr.	Davis	served	as	Director,	Finance,	Operations	and	Logistics	and	from April	2003	to	December	2003,	he	served	as	Associate	Director,	Finance.

Mr.	McCaulley	was	appointed	President,	Zimmer	Reconstructive	in	November	2008.	He	has	overall	responsibility	for	the	Global	Reconstructive	Business,	including	direct	responsibility	for	Global	Brand	Management,	Product Development	and	Medical	Training	and	Education,	as	well	as	Americas	Marketing	and	Sales.	Prior	to	joining	Zimmer,	he	served	as	President	and	Chief	Executive	Officer	of	the	Health	Division	of	Wolters	Kluwer	from	2005	and	Vice President	and	General	Manager	of	the	Diabetes	Division	of	Medtronic,	Inc.	from	2002.

Mr.	Melzi	was	appointed	Chairman,	Europe,	Middle	East	and	Africa	of	Zimmer	Holdings	in	October	2003.	He	is	responsible	for	the	sales,	marketing	and	distribution	of	products	in	the	European,	Middle	Eastern	and	African	regions.	From March	2000	to	October	2003,	Mr.	Melzi	served	as	President,	Europe/MEA.

Mr.	Ooi	was	appointed	President,	Asia	Pacific	of	Zimmer	Holdings	in	December	2005.	He	is	responsible	for	the	sales,	marketing	and	distribution	of	products	in	the	Asia	Pacific	region,	including	responsibility	for	Japan.	From	September 2003	to	December	2005,	Mr.	Ooi	served	as	President,	Australasia,	where	he	was	responsible	for	operations	in	Asia	Pacific,	excluding	Japan.	From	September	2002	to	September	2003,	Mr.	Ooi	served	as	President,	Asia	Pacific	region.

Mr.	Paulsen	was	appointed	Group	President,	Global	Businesses	of	Zimmer	Holdings	in	December	2009.	He	has	responsibility	for	Zimmer	Spine,	Zimmer	Dental,	Zimmer	Trauma	and	Zimmer	Orthopaedic	Surgical	Products.	Prior	to joining	us,	Mr.	Paulsen	served	as	Chief	Operating	Officer	of	MPS	Group,	Inc.,	a	privately	held	environmental	services	and	facility	management	firm,	from	September	2008	to	December	2009.	Prior	to	that,	he	served	as	Group	President	of TriMas	Corporation,	a	specialty	manufacturing	company,	from	January	2007	to	June	2008.	Before	joining	TriMas	Corporation,	Mr.	Paulsen	held	a	number	of	increasingly	responsible	executive	roles	at	Stryker	Corporation	from	1996	to December	2006,	including	President,	Orthopaedic	Reconstructive	Division.

Mr.	Phipps	was	appointed	Senior	Vice	President,	General	Counsel	and	Secretary	of	Zimmer	Holdings	in	May	2007.	He	has	global	responsibility	for	our	legal	affairs	and	he	serves	as	Secretary	to	the	Board	of	Directors.	Mr.	Phipps	also oversees	our	Government	Affairs,	Corporate	Communications	and	Public	Relations	activities.	From	December	2005	to	May	2007,	Mr.	Phipps	served	as	Associate	General	Counsel	and	Corporate	Secretary	and	from	September	2003	to December	2005,	he	served	as	Associate	Counsel	and	Assistant	Secretary.

# AVAILABLE	INFORMATION

Our	Internet	website	address	is	www.zimmer.com.	Our	annual	reports	on	Form	10-K,	quarterly	reports	on	Form	10-Q,	current	reports	on	Form	8-K	and	amendments	to	those	reports	filed	or	furnished	pursuant	to	Section	13(a)	or	15(d) of	the	Exchange	Act	are	available	or	may	be	accessed	free	of	charge	through	the	Investor	Relations	section	of	our	Internet	website	as	soon	as	reasonably	practicable	after	we	electronically	file	such	material	with,	or	furnish	it	to,	the	SEC.	Our Internet	website	and	the	information	contained	therein	or	connected	thereto	are	not	intended	to	be	incorporated	by	reference	into	this	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K.

The	following	corporate	governance	and	related	documents,	among	others,	are	available	through	our	website:	Corporate	Governance	Guidelines,	Code	of	Business	Conduct,	Code	of	Ethics	for	Chief	Executive	Officer	and	Senior Financial	Officers,	Audit	Committee	Charter,	Compensation	and	Management	Development	Committee	Charter,	Corporate	Governance	Committee	Charter	and	Science	and	Technology	Committee	Charter.

We	will	post	on	our	Internet	website	any	substantive	amendment	to,	or	waiver	from,	our	Code	of	Ethics	for	Chief	Executive	Officer	and	Senior	Financial	Officers	or	a	provision	of	our	Code	of	Business	Conduct	that	applies	to	any	of our	directors	or	executive	officers.

Risk	factors	which	could	cause	actual	results	to	differ	from	our	expectations	and	which	could	negatively	impact	our	financial	condition	and	results	of	operations	are	discussed	below	and	elsewhere	in	this	report.	The	risks	and uncertainties	described	below	are	not	the	only	ones	we	face.	Additional	risks	and	uncertainties	not	presently	known	to	us	or	that	are	currently	not	believed	to	be	significant	to	our	business	may	also	affect	our	actual	results	and	could	harm our	business,	financial	condition	and	results	of	operations.	If	any	of	the	risks	or	uncertainties	described	below	or	any	additional	risks	and	uncertainties	actually	occur,	our	business,	results	of

operations	and	financial	condition	could	be	materially	and	adversely	affected.

# RISKS	RELATED	TO	OUR	BUSINESS

If	we	fail	to	comply	with	the	terms	of	the	Corporate	Integrity	Agreement	we	entered	into	in	September	2007,	we	may	be	subject	to	exclusion	from	federal	healthcare	programs.

As	previously	reported,	in	September	2007	we	settled	an	investigation	conducted	by	the	United	States	Attorney's	Office	for	the	District	of	New	Jersey	(U.S.	Attorney)	into	financial	relationships	between	major	orthopaedic manufacturers	and	consulting	orthopaedic	surgeons.	As	part	of	that	settlement,	we	entered	into	a	Corporate	Integrity	Agreement	(CIA)	with	the	Office	of	Inspector	General	of	the	Department	of	Health	and	Human	Services	(OIG-HHS).	A copy	of	the	CIA	is	filed	as	an	exhibit	to	this	report.	If	we	do	not	comply	with	the	terms	of	the	CIA,	we	could	be	subject	to	exclusion	by	OIG-HHS	from	participation	in	federal	healthcare	programs,	including	Medicaid	and	Medicare.

We	could	be	subject	to	further	governmental	investigations	or	actions	by	other	third	parties	based	on	allegations	of	wrongdoing	similar	to	those	made	by	the	U.S.	Attorney.

Our	settlement	with	the	U.S.	government	does	not	preclude	other	governmental	agencies	or	state	authorities	from	conducting	investigations	or	instituting	proceedings	based	on	allegations	of	wrongdoing	similar	to	those	made	by	the U.S.	Attorney.	As	previously	disclosed,	we	are	cooperating	with	the	U.S.	Securities	and	Exchange	Commission	and	the	U.S.	Department	of	Justice	with	regard	to	an	ongoing	investigation	into	potential	violations	of	the	Foreign	Corrupt Practices	Act	in	the	sale	of	medical	devices	in	a	number	of	foreign	countries	by	companies	in	the	medical	device	industry.	We	are	also	cooperating	with	investigative	demands	made	by	two	state	attorneys	general.	While	we	believe	that	the pending	state	investigations	are	not	likely	to	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	business	or	financial	condition,	similar	investigations	by	other	states	or	governmental	agencies	are	possible.	We	cannot	assure	that	the	costs	of	defending	or resolving	those	investigations	or	proceedings	would	not	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	financial	condition,	results	of	operations	and	cash	flows.

# Our	temporary	suspension	of	the	U.S.	marketing	and	distribution	of	one	of	our	hip	products	has	adversely	affected	sales	growth,	resulted	in	claims	and	may	adversely	affect	our	ability	to	compete	in	the	hip	resurfacing market	in	the	U.S.

As	previously	reported,	we	temporarily	suspended	the	marketing	and	distribution	of	our	Durom	Acetabular	Component	(Durom	Cup)	in	the	U.S.	in	July	2008.	Although	we	resumed	U.S.	marketing	and	distribution	in	August	2008, we	believe	the	effects	of	this	action	had	a	negative	impact	on	our	hip	product	sales	growth	through	2009	and	may	continue	to	have	a	negative	impact	in	2010.

Following	our	action,	product	liability	lawsuits	and	other	claims	were	asserted	against	us	and	additional	similar	claims	may	be	asserted.	In	addition,	our	entry	into	the	U.S.	hip	resurfacing	market	has	been	delayed	as	the	Durom	Cup had	been	integral	to	our	plans	for	entry	into	that	market.

If	we	fail	to	retain	the	independent	agents	and	distributors	upon	whom	we	rely	heavily	to	market	our	products,	customers	may	not	buy	our	products	and	our	revenue	and	profitability	may	decline.

Our	marketing	success	in	the	United	States	and	abroad	depends	significantly	upon	our	agents'	and	distributors'	sales	and	service	expertise	in	the	marketplace.	Many	of	these	agents	have	developed	professional	relationships	with existing	and	potential	customers	because	of	the	agents'	detailed	knowledge	of	products	and	instruments.	A	loss	of	a	significant	number	of	these	agents	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	business	and	results	of	operations.

If	we	do	not	introduce	new	products	in	a	timely	manner,	our	products	may	become	obsolete	over	time,	customers	may	not	buy	our	products	and	our	revenue	and	profitability	may	decline.

Demand	for	our	products	may	change,	in	certain	cases,	in	ways	we	may	not	anticipate	because	of:

•	evolving	customer	needs;

•	changing	demographics;

•	slowing	industry	growth	rates;

•	declines	in	the	reconstructive	implant	market;

•	the	introduction	of	new	products	and	technologies;

•	evolving	surgical	philosophies;	and

•	evolving	industry	standards.

Without	the	timely	introduction	of	new	products	and	enhancements,	our	products	may	become	obsolete	over	time.	If	that	happens,	our	revenue	and	operating	results	would	suffer.	The	success	of	our	new	product	offerings	will	depend on	several	factors,	including	our	ability	to:

•	properly	identify	and	anticipate	customer	needs;

•	commercialize	new	products	in	a	timely	manner;

•	 manufacture	and	deliver	instruments	and	products	in	sufficient	volumes	on	time;

•	differentiate	our	offerings	from	competitors'	offerings;

•	achieve	positive	clinical	outcomes	for	new	products;

•	satisfy	the	increased	demands	by	healthcare	payors,	providers	and	patients	for	shorter	hospital	stays,	faster	post-operative	recovery	and	lower-cost	procedures;

•	innovate	and	develop	new	materials,	product	designs	and	surgical	techniques;	and

•	provide	adequate	medical	education	relating	to	new	products.

In	addition,	new	materials,	product	designs	and	surgical	techniques	that	we	develop	may	not	be	accepted	quickly,	in	some	or	all	markets,	because	of,	among	other	factors: •	entrenched	patterns	of	clinical	practice;

•	the	need	for	regulatory	clearance;	and

•	uncertainty	with	respect	to	third-party	reimbursement.

Moreover,	innovations	generally	require	a	substantial	investment	in	research	and	development	before	we	can	determine	their	commercial	viability	and	we	may	not	have	the	financial	resources	necessary	to	fund	the	production.	In addition,	even	if	we	are	able	to	successfully	develop	enhancements	or	new	generations	of	our	products,	these

enhancements	or	new	generations	of	products	may	not	produce	revenue	in	excess	of	the	costs	of	development	and	they	may	be	quickly	rendered	obsolete	by	changing	customer	preferences	or	the	introduction	by	our	competitors	of	products embodying	new	technologies	or	features.

We	conduct	a	significant	amount	of	our	sales	activity	outside	of	the	United	States,	which	subjects	us	to	additional	business	risks	and	may	cause	our	profitability	to	decline	due	to	increased	costs.

We	sell	our	products	in	more	than	100	countries	and	derive	more	than	40	percent	of	our	net	sales	from	outside	the	United	States.	We	intend	to	continue	to	pursue	growth	opportunities	in	sales	internationally,	which	could	expose	us	to additional	risks	associated	with	international	sales	and	operations.	Our	international	operations	are,	and	will	continue	to	be,	subject	to	a	number	of	risks	and	potential	costs,	including:

•	changes	in	foreign	medical	reimbursement	policies	and	programs;

•	unexpected	changes	in	foreign	regulatory	requirements;

•	differing	local	product	preferences	and	product	requirements;

•	fluctuations	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates;

•	diminished	protection	of	intellectual	property	in	some	countries	outside	of	the	United	States;

•	trade	protection	measures	and	import	or	export	requirements	that	may	prevent	us	from	shipping	products	to	a	particular	market	and	may	increase	our	operating	costs;

•	foreign	exchange	controls	that	might	prevent	us	from	repatriating	cash	earned	in	countries	outside	the	United	States;

•	complex	data	privacy	requirements	and	labor	relations	laws;

•	extraterritorial	effects	of	U.S.	laws	such	as	the	Foreign	Corrupt	Practices	Act;

•	difficulty	in	staffing	and	managing	foreign	operations;

•	labor	force	instability;

•	potentially	negative	consequences	from	changes	in	tax	laws;	and

•	political	and	economic	instability.

Violations	of	foreign	laws	or	regulations	could	result	in	fines,	criminal	sanctions	against	us,	our	officers	or	our	employees,	prohibitions	on	the	conduct	of	our	business	and	damage	to	our	reputation.

We	are	subject	to	risks	arising	from	currency	exchange	rate	fluctuations,	which	can	increase	our	costs,	cause	our	profitability	to	decline	and	expose	us	to	counterparty	risks.

A	substantial	portion	of	our	foreign	revenues	are	generated	in	Europe	and	Japan.	The	United	States	dollar	value	of	our	foreign-generated	revenues	varies	with	currency	exchange	rate	fluctuations.	Significant	increases	in	the	value	of the	United	States	dollar	relative	to	the	Euro	or	the	Japanese	Yen,	as	well	as	other	currencies,	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	results	of	operations.	Although	we	address	currency	risk	management	through	regular	operating	and financing	activities,	and,	on	a	limited	basis,	through	the	use	of	derivative	financial	instruments,	those	actions	may	not	prove	to	be	fully	effective.

# We	may	fail	to	adequately	protect	our	proprietary	technology	and	other	intellectual	property,	which	would	allow	competitors	or	others	to	take	advantage	of	our	research	and	development	efforts.

Our	long-term	success	largely	depends	on	our	ability	to	market	technologically	competitive	products.	If	we	fail	to	obtain	or	maintain	adequate	intellectual	property	protection,	we	may	not	be	able	to	prevent	third	parties	from	using	our proprietary	technologies.	Also,	our	currently	pending	or	future	patent	applications	may	not	result	in	issued	patents,	and	issued	patents	are	subject	to	claims	concerning	priority,	scope	and	other	issues.

The	United	States	Patent	and	Trademark	Office	and	the	courts	have	not	consistently	treated	the	breadth	of	claims	allowed	or	interpreted	in	orthopaedic	reconstructive	implant	and	biotechnology	patents.	Future	changes	in,	or unexpected	interpretations	of,	the	patent	laws	may	adversely	affect	our	ability	to	enforce	our	patent	position.

In	addition,	intellectual	property	rights	may	be	unavailable	or	of	limited	effect	in	some	foreign	countries.	If	we	do	not	obtain	sufficient	international	protection	for	our	intellectual	property,	our	competitiveness	in	international	markets could	be	impaired,	which	could	limit	our	growth	and	revenue.

We	also	attempt	to	protect	our	trade	secrets,	proprietary	know-how	and	continuing	technological	innovation	with	security	measures,	including	the	use	of	confidentiality	agreements	with	our	employees,	consultants	and	collaborators. These	measures	may	prove	to	be	ineffective	and	any	remedies	available	to	us	may	be	insufficient	to	compensate	our	damages.

We	may	be	subject	to	intellectual	property	litigation	and	infringement	claims,	which	could	cause	us	to	incur	significant	expenses	or	prevent	us	from	selling	our	products.

A	successful	claim	of	patent	or	other	intellectual	property	infringement	against	us	could	adversely	affect	our	growth	and	profitability,	in	some	cases	materially.	From	time	to	time,	we	receive	notices	from	third	parties	of	potential infringement	and	receive	claims	of	potential	infringement.	We	may	be	unaware	of	intellectual	property	rights	of	others	that	may	cover	some	of	our	technology.	If	someone	claims	that	our	products	infringed	their	intellectual	property	rights, any	resulting	litigation	could	be	costly	and	time	consuming	and	would	divert	the	attention	of	management	and	key	personnel	from	other	business	issues.	If	we	were	to	lose	such	litigation	involving	material	intellectual	property	rights,	we	may be	unable	to	manufacture,	sell	or	use	some	of	our	products.

# We	may	make	additional	acquisitions	or	enter	into	strategic	alliances	that	could	increase	our	costs	or	liabilities	or	be	disruptive.

We	intend	to	continue	to	look	for	additional	strategic	acquisitions	of	other	businesses	that	are	complementary	to	our	businesses	and	other	companies	with	whom	we	could	form	strategic	alliances	or	enter	into	other	arrangements	to develop	or	exploit	intellectual	property	rights.	These	activities	involve	risks,	including	the	following:

•	 we	may	need	to	divert	more	management	resources	to	integration	than	we	planned,	which	may	adversely	affect	our	ability	to	pursue	other	more	profitable	activities;

•	the	difficulties	of	integrating	acquired	businesses	may	be	increased	if	we	need	to	integrate	geographically	separated	organizations,	personnel	with	disparate	business	backgrounds	and	companies	with	different	corporate	cultures;

•	 we	may	not	recognize	expected	cost	savings	or	the	anticipated	benefits	of	acquisitions	or	strategic	alliances;

•	our	acquisition	candidates	or	strategic	partners	may	have	unexpected	liabilities	or	prove	unable	to	meet	their	obligations	to	us	or	the	joint	venture;	and

•	the	priorities	of	our	strategic	partners	may	prove	incompatible	with	ours.

# We	depend	on	a	limited	number	of	suppliers	for	some	key	raw	materials	and	outsourced	activities.

We	use	a	number	of	suppliers	for	raw	materials	that	we	need	to	manufacture	our	products	and	to	outsource	some	key	manufacturing	activities.	These	suppliers	must	provide	the	materials	and	perform	the	activities	to	our	standards	for us	to	meet	our	quality	and	regulatory	requirements.	Some	key	raw	materials	and	outsourced	activities	can	only	be	obtained	from	a	single	source	or	a	limited	number	of	sources.	A	prolonged	disruption	or	other	inability	to	obtain	these materials	or	outsource	key	manufacturing	activities	could	materially	and	adversely	affect	our	ability	to	satisfy	demand	for	our	products.

# We	are	subject	to	putative	stockholder	class	action	lawsuits	that	could	be	costly	to	defend	and	distracting	to	management.

We	and	a	number	of	our	related	parties	are	defending	putative	stockholder	class	action	lawsuits	alleging	violations	of	the	securities	laws	or	violations	of	the	federal	Employee	Retirement	Income	Security	Act	of	1974	arising	out	of trading	or	ownership	of	our	common	stock.	We	believe	these	lawsuits	are	without	merit,	and	we	intend	to	defend	them	vigorously.	We	may	incur	significant	expenses	associated	with	the	defense	of	these	lawsuits,	however,	and	the	necessary participation	of	our	executive	officers	could	detract	from	their	ability	to	devote	their	full	time	and	attention	to	our	business	operations.

# RISKS	RELATED	TO	OUR	INDUSTRY

The	ongoing	investigation	by	the	U.S.	Securities	and	Exchange	Commission	and	the	U.S.	Department	of	Justice	regarding	potential	violations	of	the	Foreign	Corrupt	Practices	Act	in	the	sale	of	medical	devices	in	a number	of	foreign	countries	by	companies	in	the	medical	device	industry	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	business,	financial	condition	and	cash	flows.

We	are	cooperating	fully	with	the	U.S.	Securities	and	Exchange	Commission	and	the	U.S.	Department	of	Justice	with	regard	to	an	ongoing	investigation	of	potential	violations	of	the	Foreign	Corrupt	Practices	Act	in	the	sale	of medical	devices	in	a	number	of	foreign	countries	by	companies	in	the	medical	device	industry.	Although	we	have	adopted	policies	and	procedures	designed	to	prevent	improper	payments	and	we	train	our	employees,	distributors	and	others concerning	these	issues,	we	cannot	assure	that	violations	of	these	requirements	will	not	occur.	If	we	are	found	to	have	violated	the	Foreign	Corrupt	Practices	Act,	we	may	face	sanctions	including	fines,	criminal	penalties,	disgorgement	of profits	and	suspension	or	debarment	of	our	ability	to	contract	with	governmental	agencies	or	receive	export	licenses.

# The	impact	of	healthcare	reform	in	the	U.S.	on	us	is	uncertain.

There	is	increasing	emphasis	within	the	federal	government	to	reform	healthcare	in	the	U.S.,	though	it	is	uncertain	whether	new	legislation	will	be	enacted.	To	the	extent	that	the	number	of	uninsured	or	underinsured	patients	is reduced,	demand	for	our	products	could	marginally	increase.	However,	efforts	to	pay	for	healthcare	reform	through	a	proposed	new	tax	on	medical	device	companies	and	efforts	to	contain	healthcare	costs,	directly	through	pricing	or reimbursement	controls	or	indirectly	by	government-sponsored	healthcare	insurance,	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	sales	and	results	of	operations.	Accordingly,	the	impact	of	healthcare	reform	on	the	medical	device	industry	in general	or	us	in	particular	remains	uncertain.

# We	are	subject	to	healthcare	fraud	and	abuse	regulations	on	an	ongoing	basis	that	could	require	us	to	change	our	business	practices	and	restrict	our	operations	in	the	future.

Our	industry	is	subject	to	various	federal	and	state	laws	pertaining	to	healthcare	fraud	and	abuse,	including	false	claims	laws,	the	federal	Anti-Kickback	Statute,	similar	state	laws	and	physician	self-referral	laws.	Violations	of	these laws	are	punishable	by	criminal	and/or	civil	sanctions,	including,	in	some	instances,	fines,	imprisonment	and,	within	the	United	States,	exclusion	from	participation	in	government	healthcare	programs,	including	Medicare,	Medicaid	and Veterans	Administration	(VA)	health	programs.	The	interpretation	and	enforcement	of	these	laws	and	regulations	are	uncertain	and	subject	to	rapid	change.

If	third-party	payors	decline	to	reimburse	our	customers	for	our	products	or	reduce	reimbursement	levels,	the	demand	for	our	products	may	decline	and	our	ability	to	sell	our	products	profitably	may	be	harmed.

We	sell	our	products	and	services	to	hospitals,	doctors,	dentists	and	other	healthcare	providers,	all	of	which	receive	reimbursement	for	the	healthcare	services	provided	to	their	patients	from	third-party	payors,	such	as	domestic	and international	government	programs,	private	insurance	plans	and	managed	care	programs.	These	third-party	payors	may	deny	reimbursement	if	they	determine	that	a	device	used	in	a	procedure	was	not	in	accordance	with	cost-effective treatment	methods,	as	determined	by	the	third-party	payor,	or	was	used	for	an	unapproved	indication.	Third-party	payors	may	also	decline	to	reimburse	for	experimental	procedures	and	devices.	If	our	products	are	not	considered	cost- effective	by	third-party	payors,	our	customers	may	not	be	reimbursed	for	our	products.

In	addition,	third-party	payors	are	increasingly	attempting	to	contain	healthcare	costs	by	limiting	both	coverage	and	the	level	of	reimbursement	for	medical	products	and	services.	If	third-party	payors	reduce	reimbursement	levels	to hospitals	and	other	healthcare	providers	for	our	products,	demand	for	our	products	may	decline,	or	we	may	experience	pressure	to

reduce	the	prices	of	our	products,	which	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	sales	and	results	of	operations.

We	have	also	experienced	downward	pressure	on	product	pricing	and	other	effects	of	healthcare	reform	in	our	international	markets.	If	key	participants	in	government	healthcare	systems	reduce	the	reimbursement	levels	for	our products,	our	sales	and	results	of	operations	may	be	adversely	affected.

# The	ongoing	cost-containment	efforts	of	healthcare	purchasing	organizations	may	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	results	of	operations.

Many	customers	for	our	products	have	formed	group	purchasing	organizations	in	an	effort	to	contain	costs.	Group	purchasing	organizations	negotiate	pricing	arrangements	with	medical	supply	manufacturers	and	distributors,	and these	negotiated	prices	are	made	available	to	a	group	purchasing	organization's	affiliated	hospitals	and	other	members.	If	we	are	not	one	of	the	providers	selected	by	a	group	purchasing	organization,	affiliated	hospitals	and	other	members may	be	less	likely	to	purchase	our	products,	and,	if	the	group	purchasing	organization	has	negotiated	a	strict	compliance	contract	for	another	manufacturer's	products,	we	may	be	precluded	from	making	sales	to	members	of	the	group purchasing	organization	for	the	duration	of	the	contractual	arrangement.	Our	failure	to	respond	to	the	cost-containment	efforts	of	group	purchasing	organizations	may	cause	us	to	lose	market	share	to	our	competitors	and	could	have	a material	adverse	effect	on	our	sales	and	results	of	operations.

# Our	success	depends	on	our	ability	to	effectively	develop	and	market	our	products	against	those	of	our	competitors.

We	operate	in	a	highly	competitive	environment.	Our	present	or	future	products	could	be	rendered	obsolete	or	uneconomical	by	technological	advances	by	one	or	more	of	our	present	or	future	competitors	or	by	other	therapies, including	biological	therapies.	To	remain	competitive,	we	must	continue	to	develop	and	acquire	new	products	and	technologies.	Competition	is	primarily	on	the	basis	of:

•	technology;

•	innovation;

•	have	greater	financial,	marketing	and	other	resources	than	us;

•	respond	more	quickly	to	new	or	emerging	technologies;

•	undertake	more	extensive	marketing	campaigns;

•	adopt	more	aggressive	pricing	policies;	or

•	be	more	successful	in	attracting	potential	customers,	employees	and	strategic	partners.

Any	of	these	factors,	alone	or	in	combination,	could	cause	us	to	have	difficulty	maintaining	or	increasing	sales	of	our	products.

We	and	our	customers	are	subject	to	various	governmental	regulations	relating	to	the	manufacturing,	labeling	and	marketing	of	our	products,	and	we	may	incur	significant	expenses	to	comply	with	these	regulations	and develop	products	compatible	with	these	regulations.

The	medical	devices	we	design,	develop,	manufacture	and	market	are	subject	to	rigorous	regulation	by	the	FDA	and	numerous	other	federal,	state	and	foreign	governmental	authorities.	The	process	of	obtaining	regulatory	approvals	to market	a	medical	device	can	be	costly	and	time	consuming	and	approvals	might	not	be	granted	for	future	products	on	a	timely	basis,	if	at	all.	Delays	in	receipt	of,	or	failure	to	obtain,	approvals	for	future	products	could	result	in	delayed realization	of	product	revenues	or	in	substantial	additional	costs.

In	addition,	if	we	fail	to	comply	with	applicable	material	regulatory	requirements,	including,	for	example,	the	Quality	System	Regulation,	recordkeeping	regulations,	labeling	requirements	and	adverse	event	reporting	regulations,	we may	be	subject	to	a	range	of	sanctions	including:

•	 warning	letters;

•	fines	or	civil	penalties;

•	injunctions;

•	repairs,	replacements	or	refunds;

•	recalls	or	seizures	of	products;

•	total	or	partial	suspension	of	production;

•	the	FDA's	refusal	to	grant	future	premarket	clearances	or	approvals;

•	 withdrawals	or	suspensions	of	current	product	applications;	and •	criminal	prosecution.

Our	products	and	operations	are	also	often	subject	to	the	rules	of	industrial	standards	bodies,	such	as	the	International	Standards	Organization.	If	we	fail	to	adequately	address	any	of	these	regulations,	our	business	will	be	harmed.

# We	may	incur	product	liability	losses,	and	insurance	coverage	may	be	inadequate	or	unavailable	to	cover	these	losses.

In	the	ordinary	course	of	business,	we	are	the	subject	of	product	liability	lawsuits	alleging	that	component	failures,	manufacturing	flaws,	design	defects	or	inadequate	disclosure	of	product-related	risks	or	product-related	information resulted	in	an	unsafe	condition	or	injury	to	patients.	Product	liability	lawsuits	and	claims,	safety	alerts	or	product	recalls,	regardless	of	their	ultimate	outcome,	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	business	and	reputation	and	on	our ability	to	attract	and	retain	customers.

Although	we	maintain	third-party	product	liability	insurance	coverage,	it	is	possible	that	claims	against	us	may	exceed	the	coverage	limits	of	our	insurance	policies	or	cause	us	to	record	a	self-insured	loss.	Even	if	any	product	liability loss	is	covered	by	an	insurance	policy,	these	policies	typically	have	substantial	retentions	or	deductibles	that	we	are	responsible	for.	Product	liability	claims	in	excess	of	applicable

insurance	could	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	business,	financial	condition	and	results	of	operations.

Not	Applicable.

| Location | Use | Owned/Leased | Square	Feet |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Warsaw,\tIndiana | Research\t&\tDevelopment,\tManufacturing,\tWarehousing,\tMarketing\t&\tAdministration | Owned | 1,400,000 |
| Warsaw,\tIndiana | Corporate\tHeadquarters\tand\tThe\tZimmer\tInstitute | Owned | 117,000 |
| Warsaw,\tIndiana | Offices,\tManufacturing\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 90,000 |
| Carlsbad,\tCalifornia | Offices,\tResearch\t&\tDevelopment\t&\tManufacturing | Leased | 118,000 |
| Minneapolis,\tMinnesota | Offices\t&\tResearch\t&\tDevelopment | Owned | 51,000 |
| Statesville,\tNorth\tCarolina | Manufacturing\t&\tWarehousing | Owned | 156,000 |
| Dover,\tOhio | Offices,\tResearch\t&\tDevelopment\t&\tManufacturing | Owned | 140,000 |
| Dover,\tOhio | Warehousing | Leased | 61,000 |
| Parsippany,\tNew\tJersey | Office,\tResearch\t&\tDevelopment,\tManufacturing, | Leased | 115,000 |
| Memphis,\tTennessee | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 30,000 |
| Austin,\tTexas | Offices,\tAdministration,\tResearch\t&\tDevelopment | Leased | 97,000 |
| Sydney,\tAustralia | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 36,000 |
| Mödling,\tAustria | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Owned | 14,000 |
| Wemmel,\tBelgium | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 15,000 |
| Mississauga,\tCanada | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 52,000 |
| Shanghai,\tChina | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 18,000 |
| Etupes,\tFrance | Offices,\tManufacturing\t&\tWarehousing | Owned | 90,000 |
| Eschbach,\tGermany | Distribution\tCenter | Owned | 94,000 |
| Freiburg,\tGermany | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 51,000 |
| Kiel,\tGermany | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 21,000 |
| Shannon,\tIreland | Offices\t&\tManufacturing | Owned | 125,000 |
| Milan,\tItaly | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 47,000 |
| Gotemba,\tJapan | Offices,\tService\tCenter\t&\tWarehousing | Owned | 87,000 |
| Tokyo,\tJapan | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 24,000 |
| Seoul,\tKorea | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 22,000 |
| Utrecht,\tNetherlands | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 16,000 |
| Ponce,\tPuerto\tRico | Offices,\tManufacturing\t&\tWarehousing | Owned | 213,000 |
| Singapore | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 19,000 |
| Barcelona,\tSpain | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 16,000 |
| Winterthur,\tSwitzerland | Offices,\tResearch\t&\tDevelopment\t&\tManufacturing | Leased | 374,000 |
| Münsingen,\tSwitzerland | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Owned | 76,000 |
| Swindon,\tUnited\tKingdom | Offices\t&\tWarehousing | Leased | 70,000 |

During	2009	we	commenced	manufacturing	operations	in	our	new	125,000	square	feet	Shannon,	Ireland	facility	and	began	utilizing	our	new	94,000	square	feet	warehouse	facility	in	Eschbach,	Germany	in	an	effort	to	expand	our global	distribution	network.	We	believe	the	current	facilities,	including	manufacturing,	warehousing,	research	and	development	and	office	space	provide	sufficient	capacity	to	meet	ongoing	demands.	Once	a	facility	reaches	85	percent utilization,	we	examine	alternatives	for	either	expanding	that	facility	or	acquiring	new	facilities	to	meet	our	ongoing	demands.

In	addition	to	the	above,	we	maintain	more	than	100	other	offices	and	warehouse	facilities	in	more	than	25	countries	around	the	world,	including	the	United	States,	Japan,	Australia,	France,	Russia,	India,	Germany,	Italy,	Switzerland and	China.	We	believe	that	all	of	the	facilities	and	equipment	are	in	good	condition,	well	maintained	and	able	to	operate	at	present	levels.

Information	pertaining	to	legal	proceedings	can	be	found	in	Note	17	to	the	Consolidated	Financial	Statements,	which	are	included	in	this	report	under	Item	8.

# Market	for	the	Registrant's	Common	Equity,	Related	Stockholder	Matters	and	Issuer	Purchases	of	Equity	Securities

Our	common	stock	is	traded	on	the	New	York	Stock	Exchange	and	the	SIX	Swiss	Exchange	under	the	symbol	"ZMH."	The	high	and	low	sales	prices	for	our	common	stock	on	the	New	York	Stock	Exchange	for	the	calendar	quarters of	fiscal	years	2009	and	2008	are	set	forth	as	follows:

| Quarterly	High-Low	Share	Prices | High | Low |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2009: |  |  |
| First\tQuarter | $44.36 | $30.67 |
| Second\tQuarter | $47.41 | $35.36 |
| Third\tQuarter | $55.25 | $38.55 |
| Fourth\tQuarter | $60.64 | $49.14 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2008: |  |  |
| First\tQuarter | $79.78 | $63.80 |
| Second\tQuarter | $80.92 | $66.12 |
| Third\tQuarter | $74.55 | $60.41 |
| Fourth\tQuarter | $66.42 | $34.10 |

We	have	not	declared	or	paid	dividends	on	our	common	stock	since	becoming	a	public	company	in	2001.	Currently,	we	do	not	anticipate	paying	any	cash	dividends	on	the	common	stock	in	the	foreseeable	future.	Our	credit	facility also	restricts	the	payment	of	dividends	under	certain	circumstances.

The	number	of	holders	of	our	common	stock	on	February	12,	2010	was	approximately	350,200.	On	February	12,	2010,	the	closing	price	of	the	common	stock,	as	reported	on	the	New	York	Stock	Exchange,	was	$57.24	per	share.

The	information	required	by	this	Item	concerning	equity	compensation	plans	is	incorporated	by	reference	to	Item	12	of	this	report.

The	following	table	summarizes	repurchases	of	common	stock	settled	during	the	three	months	ended	December	31,	2009:

|  | Total	Number	of<br>Shares	Purchased | Average	Price<br>Paid	per	Share | Total	Number	of	Shares<br>Purchased	as	Part	of<br>Publicly	Announced	Plans<br>or	Programs(1) | Approximate	Dollar	Value	of<br>Shares	that	May	Yet	Be<br>Purchased	Under	Plans<br>or	Programs |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| October\t2009 |  | –\t $– | 40,940,867 | $730,190,146 |
| November\t2009 | 3,892,800 | 56.88 | 44,833,667 | 508,750,284 |
| December\t2009 | 5,059,981 | 58.82 | 49,893,648 | 211,110,839 |
| Total | 8,952,781 | $57.98 | 49,893,648 | $211,110,839 |

(1) Includes	repurchases	made	under	expired	programs	as	well	as	the	program	announced	in	April	2008	authorizing	$1.25	billion	of	repurchases	through	December	31,	2010.

| Summary	of	Operations | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Net\tsales | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | $3,897.5 | $3,495.4 | $3,286.1 |
| Net\tearnings\tof\tZimmer\tHoldings,\tInc. | 717.4 | 848.6 | 773.2 | 834.5 | 732.5 |
| Earnings\tper\tcommon\tshare |  |  |  |  |  |
| Basic | $3.34 | $3.73 | $3.28 | $3.43 | $2.96 |
| Diluted | 3.32 | 3.72 | 3.26 | 3.40 | 2.93 |
| Average\tcommon\tshares\toutstanding |  |  |  |  |  |
| Basic | 215.0 | 227.3 | 235.5 | 243.0 | 247.1 |
| Diluted | 215.8 | 228.3 | 237.5 | 245.4 | 249.8 |
| Balance\tSheet\tData |  |  |  |  |  |
| Total\tassets | $7,785.5 | $7,239.0 | $6,633.7 | $5,974.4 | $5,721.9 |
| Long-term\tdebt | \t1,127.6 | 460.1 | 104.3 | 99.6 | 81.6 |
| Other\tlong-term\tobligations | 328.5 | 353.9 | 328.4 | 323.4 | 348.3 |
| Stockholders'\tequity | \t5,638.7 | \t5,653.9 | \t5,452.4 | \t4,923.2 | \t4,685.1 |

The	following	discussion	and	analysis	should	be	read	in	conjunction	with	the	consolidated	financial	statements	and	the	corresponding	notes	included	elsewhere	in	this	Form	10-K.

We	are	a	global	leader	in	the	design,	development,	manufacture	and	marketing	of	orthopaedic	reconstructive	implants,	dental	implants,	spinal	implants,	trauma	products	and	related	surgical	products	(sometimes	referred	to	in	this report	as	OSP).	We	also	provide	other	healthcare	related	services.	We	have	operations	in	more	than	25	countries	and	market	products	in	more	than	100	countries.	We	manage	operations	through	three	reportable	geographic	segments	—	the Americas,	Europe	and	Asia	Pacific.

Certain	percentages	presented	in	this	discussion	and	analysis	are	calculated	from	the	underlying	whole-dollar	amounts	and	therefore	may	not	recalculate	from	the	rounded	numbers	used	for	disclosure	purposes.	Certain	amounts	in	the 2008	and	2007	consolidated	financial	statements	have	been	reclassified	to	conform	to	the	2009	presentation.

Beginning	in	2009,	we	no	longer	include	our	Dental	product	category	sales	within	our	Reconstructive	products	category.	Amounts	in	the	years	ended	December	31,	2008	and	2007	related	to	sales	of	Dental	products	have	been reclassified	to	conform	to	the	2009	presentation.

We	believe	the	following	developments	or	trends	are	important	in	understanding	our	financial	condition,	results	of	operations	and	cash	flows	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009.

# Demand	(Volume	and	Mix)	Trends

Increased	volume	and	changes	in	the	mix	of	product	sales	contributed	2	percentage	points	of	2009	sales	growth,	which	is	1	percentage	point	below	the	rate	of	growth	from	2008	compared	to	2007.

We	believe	the	market	for	orthopaedic	procedure	volume	temporarily	decelerated	from	mid	single	digit	growth	rates	to	low	single	digit	growth	rates	on	a	global	basis	due	to	the	weakened	global	economy.	We	believe	long-term market	growth	rates	will	be	driven	by	an	aging	global	population,	obesity,	proven	clinical	benefits,	new	material	technologies,	advances	in	surgical	techniques	and	more	active	lifestyles,	among	other	factors.	In	addition,	the	ongoing	shift	in demand	to	premium	products,	such	as	Longevity	and	Prolong	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylenes,	Trabecular	Metal	Technology	products,	hip	stems	with	Kinectiv	Technology,	high-flex	knees,	knee	revision	products,	porous	hip	stems	and	the introduction	of	patient	specific	devices	continues	to	positively	affect	sales	growth.	Our	2	percentage	points	of	sales	growth	in	2009	from	volume	and	changes	in	mix	decreased	from	2008	and	was	lower	than	market	growth	due	to	the	impact of	the	disruptive	events	discussed	below.

# Pricing	Trends

Global	selling	prices	decreased	1	percent	during	2009	compared	to	flat	pricing	in	2008.	Selling	prices	in	the	Americas	decreased	1	percent	during	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	compared	to	flat	pricing	in	the	same	2008	period. Europe	selling	prices	were	flat	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	which	is	similar	to	the	2008	period.	Asia	Pacific	selling	prices	decreased	1	percent	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	compared	to	a	3	percent	decrease	in	the	same 2008	period,	as	we	anniversaried	out	of	scheduled	reductions	in	reimbursement	prices	in	Japan.	With	the	effect	of	governmental	healthcare	cost	containment	efforts	and	continuing	pressure	from	local	hospitals	and	health	systems,	we	expect selling	prices	to	decrease	approximately	1	to	2	percent	on	a	global	basis	for	2010.

# Foreign	Currency	Exchange	Rates

For	2009,	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	resulted	in	a	2	percent	decline	in	sales.	If	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	remain	consistent	with	2009	year	end	rates,	we	estimate	that	a	weaker	dollar	versus	foreign	currency	exchange	rates will	have	a	positive	effect	in	2010	of	approximately	1	percent	on	sales.	We	address	currency	risk	through	regular	operating	and	financing	activities,	and,	under	appropriate	circumstances	and	subject	to	proper	authorization,	through	the	use	of forward	contracts	and	options	solely	for	managing	foreign	currency	volatility	and	risk.	Changes	to	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	affect	sales	growth,	but	due	to	offsetting	gains/losses	on	hedge	contracts	and	options,	which	are	recorded	in cost	of	products	sold,	the	effect	on	net	earnings	in	the	near	term	is	expected	to	be	minimal.

# Disruptive	Events

We	suffered	customer	losses	as	a	result	of	disruptive	factors	experienced	during	2008,	including	the	implementation	of	our	enhanced	global	compliance	initiatives,	our	temporary	suspension	of	U.S.	marketing	and	distribution	of	the Durom	Cup	and	our	voluntary	recall	and	suspension	of	production	of	certain	OSP	patient	care	products.	We	estimate	that	these	customer	losses	reduced	our	global	knee	market	share	by	approximately	1.5	percent	and	hip	market	share	by approximately	2	percent	on	a	cumulative	basis	through	the	end	of	2008.	These	share	losses	affected	sales	growth	in	2009,	especially	in	the	first	six	to	nine	months	of	the	year,	but	stabilized	as	we	concluded	the	year.

# Global	Economic	Conditions

We	believe	adverse	conditions	in	the	broader	economy	have	resulted	in	a	slowdown	in	elective	hospital	procedures.	We	saw	evidence	of	recovery	in	2009,	although	the	large	developed	countries	in	Europe	appear	to	be	lagging	the U.S.	and	Japan.	Although	many	of	our	products	are	used	in	elective	procedures,	we	believe	our	core	knee	and	hip	franchises	remain	more	insulated	than	many	medical	product	categories	from	swings	in	the	broader	economy	because	the need	for	these	procedures	does	not	diminish,	even	if	the

timing	is	affected.	In	particular,	our	dental	revenues	have	experienced	pressure	due	to	the	weak	economic	environment	as	many	of	those	procedures	are	not	reimbursed	by	third-party	payors.

In	the	second	half	of	2009,	we	saw	encouraging	signs	that	orthopaedic	procedure	volumes	in	certain	markets	were	recovering.	Our	market	assumptions	are	that	in	2010	knee	and	hip	procedures	will	grow	in	mid	single	digits	within the	Americas	and	Asia	Pacific	markets,	and	remain	flat	to	slightly	positive	in	the	large	developed	markets	in	Europe.	Given	the	expected	pacing	of	our	new	product	launches,	such	as	the	Zimmer	MMC	Cup,	Continuum	Acetabular	System and	Zimmer	Patient	Specific	Instruments,	we	anticipate	our	sales	growth	in	2010	to	be	greater	in	the	second	half	of	the	year.

We	expect	to	continue	making	investments	in	R&D	in	the	range	of	5	to	6	percent	of	sales.	Assuming	currency	rates	remain	at	year	end	2009	levels,	we	expect	our	gross	margin	to	be	approximately	75	percent	of	sales	in	2010.	This takes	into	account	the	higher	cost	inventory	we	carry	into	2010	as	well	as	projected	foreign	currency	hedge	losses	partially	offset	by	lower	anticipated	excess	and	obsolete	inventory	charges	in	2010.	We	expect	the	gross	margin	ratio	to	be slightly	lower	in	the	first	half	of	2010	as	compared	to	the	second	half	of	the	year.	SG&A	as	a	percent	of	sales	is	expected	to	decrease	for	the	full	year	as	we	restore	leverage	from	revenue	growth	offset,	in	part,	by	sales	and	marketing investments	in	support	of	new	product	launches.	We	have	completed	the	infrastructure	investment	projects	in	Eschbach,	Germany,	our	automated,	centralized	distribution	facility	for	the	Europe,	Middle	East	and	Africa	region,	and	in Shannon,	Ireland,	our	new	implant	manufacturing	facility.	Both	facilities	are	now	operational	and	should	provide	economic	benefits	for	the	full	year	2010.

We	expect	interest	expense	will	be	unfavorable	year-over-year	due	to	the	$1	billion	senior	notes	offering	we	completed	in	the	fourth	quarter	of	2009.	The	impact	of	this	expense	on	our	diluted	earnings	per	share	should	be	more	than offset	by	the	additional	shares	we	repurchased	with	a	portion	of	the	proceeds	from	the	notes	offering.

# RESULTS	OF	OPERATIONS

# Net	Sales	by	Reportable	Segment

The	following	table	presents	net	sales	by	reportable	segment	and	the	components	of	the	percentage	changes	(dollars	in	millions):

|  | Year	Ended	December	31, | Year	Ended	December	31, |  | Volume/ |  | Foreign |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | 2009 | 2008 | %\tInc/(Dec) | Mix | Price | Exchange |
| Americas | $2,372.4 | $2,353.9 | 1% | 2% | (1)% | –% |
| Europe | 1,119.2 | 1,179.1 | (5) | 1 | – | (6) |
| Asia\tPacific | 603.8 | 588.1 | 3 | 1 | (1) | 3 |
| Total | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | (1) | 2 | (1) | (2) |

"Foreign	Exchange"	as	used	in	the	tables	in	this	report	represents	the	effect	of	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	on	sales	growth.

# Net	Sales	by	Product	Category

The	following	table	presents	net	sales	by	product	category	and	the	components	of	the	percentage	changes	(dollars	in	millions):

|  | Year	Ended	December	31, | Year	Ended	December	31, |  | Volume/ |  | Foreign |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | 2009 | 2008 | %\tInc\t(Dec) | Mix | Price | Exchange |
| Reconstructive |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Knees | $1,760.6 | $1,763.1 | –% | 3% | (1)% | (2)% |
| Hips | 1,228.5 | 1,279.4 | (4) | (1) | (1) | (2) |
| Extremities | 135.6 | 121.0 | 12 | 14 | – | (2) |
| Total | 3,124.7 | 3,163.5 | (1) | 1 | (1) | (1) |
| Dental | 204.7 | 227.5 | (10) | (9) | 1 | (2) |
| Trauma | 234.8 | 222.3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | – |
| Spine | 253.6 | 229.7 | 10 | 12 | – | (2) |
| OSP\tand\tother | 277.6 | 278.1 | – | (1) | 1 | – |
| Total | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | (1) | 2 | (1) | (2) |

|  | 2009 | 2008 | %	Inc	(Dec) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Reconstructive |  |  |  |
| Knees |  |  |  |
| Americas | $1,101.9 | $1,089.8 | 1 |
| Europe | 429.2 | 452.6 | (5) |
| Asia\tPacific | 229.5 | 220.7 | 4 |
| Hips |  |  |  |
| Americas | 565.9 | 576.1 | (2) |
| Europe | 448.6 | 493.9 | (9) |
| Asia\tPacific | 214.0 | 209.4 | 2 |
| Extremities |  |  |  |
| Americas | 103.7 | 88.1 | 18 |
| Europe | 23.9 | 25.8 | (7) |
| Asia\tPacific | 8.0 | 7.1 | 15 |
| Total | 3,124.7 | 3,163.5 | (1) |
| Dental |  |  |  |
| Americas | 102.8 | 114.9 | (11) |
| Europe | 78.2 | 82.2 | (5) |
| Asia\tPacific | 23.7 | 30.4 | (22) |
| Trauma |  |  |  |
| Americas | 125.9 | 126.7 | (1) |
| Europe | 52.7 | 47.4 | 11 |
| Asia\tPacific | 56.2 | 48.2 | 17 |
| Spine |  |  |  |
| Americas | 192.6 | 180.4 | 7 |
| Europe | 46.9 | 40.1 | 17 |
| Asia\tPacific | 14.1 | 9.2 | 54 |
| OSP\tand\tother |  |  |  |
| Americas | 179.6 | 177.9 | 1 |
| Europe | 39.7 | 37.1 | 7 |
| Asia\tPacific | 58.3 | 63.1 | (8) |
| Total | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | (1) |

# Knees

The	NexGen	Complete	Knee	Solution	product	line,	including	Gender	Solutions	Knee	Femoral	Implants,	the	NexGen	LPS-Flex	Knee,	the	NexGen	CR-Flex	Knee	and	the	NexGen	LCCK	Revision	Knee,	led	knee	sales.	In	addition,	the Gender	Solutions	Natural-Knee	Flex	System	made	a	strong	contribution.	In	Europe,	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	negatively	affected	knee	sales	by	6	percent.

The	continued	conversion	to	porous	stems,	including	the	Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Stem,	the	Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Stem	with	Kinectiv	Technology,	the	CLS	Spotorno	Stem	from	the	CLS	Hip	System	and	the	Alloclassic	Zweymüller	Hip	Stem, led	hip	stem	sales,	but	those	sales	were	partially	offset	by	weaker	sales	of	cemented	stems.	Trabecular	Metal	Acetabular	Cups	and	Longevity	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene	Liners	also	made	strong	contributions.	In	the	U.S.	hip	market,	we had	some	product	gaps	related	to	our	acetabular	cups	which	have	affected	sales	growth.	This	was	most	noticeable	in	the	area	of	metal-on-metal	articulation.	In	November	2009,	the	Continuum	Acetabular	System	and	the	Zimmer	MMC	Cup were	cleared	for	sale	in	the	U.S.	These	systems	give	surgeons	a	comprehensive	array	of	acetabular	cup	solutions	that,	in	concert	with	our	comprehensive	stem	portfolio,	provide	additional	patient	matching	options.	These	cups	have	also received	approval	in	various	countries	outside	the	U.S.	and	will	help	complete	our	product	portfolios	in	those	countries	as	well.	In	Europe,	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	negatively	affected	hip	sales	by	6	percent.	In	Asia Pacific,	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	positively	affected	hip	sales	by	4	percent.

# Extremities

The	Bigliani/Flatow	Complete	Shoulder	Solution	and	the	Zimmer	Trabecular	Metal	Reverse	Shoulder	System	led	extremities	sales.	Trabecular	Metal	Technology	is	playing	a	critical	role	in	addressing	previously	unmet	clinical	needs in	the	expanding	extremities	market.

# Dental

The	Tapered	Screw-Vent	Implant	System	led	dental	sales.	Negative	sales	growth	for	our	dental	business	reflects	overall	weakness	in	the	global	economy.	We	continue	to	believe	the	dental	market	will	rebound	as	the	global	economy recovers	and	look	forward	to	new	opportunities	as	our	product	line	is	expanded	through	internal	and	external	development	efforts.

Zimmer	Periarticular	Locking	Plates	and	the	ITST	Intertrochanteric/Subtrochanteric	Fixation	System	led	trauma	sales	but	were	partially	offset	by	declining	sales	of	compression	hip	screws.	Femoral	and	tibial	nails	within	the	new Zimmer	Natural	Nail	system	also	made	a	contribution	during	the	year.

# Spine

In	the	fourth	quarter	of	2008,	we	acquired	Abbott	Spine.	As	a	result	of	the	acquisition,	spine	sales	have	increased	but	the	increase	is	offset	in	part	by	sales	losses	associated	with	the	integration	of	the	business.	Solid	sales	of	acquired fusion	devices	as	well	as	legacy	interbody	devices	and	bone	graft	substitutes	partly	offset	a	significant	decline	in	sales	of	the	Dynesys	Dynamic	Stabilization	System	during	the	year.	We	expect	our	spinal	business	will	continue	to	experience reimbursement	challenges	related	to	the	Dynesys	system.	Following	the	November	2009	non-approvable	recommendation	by	the	FDA	advisory	panel	of	our	request	for	additional	approved	uses	for	the	Dynesys	system,	we	are	exploring	our options,	which	are	presently	uncertain.	We	believe	that	we	generally	have	a	solid	portfolio	of	spine	products	as	well	as	broad	global	distribution	capabilities	that	should	lead	to	improved	performance	over	time.

# OSP	and	other

OSP	sales	were	led	by	PALACOS	Bone	Cement.		OSP	product	sales	growth	improved	in	the	second	half	of	2009	due	to	the	effect	of	anniversarying	out	of	the	voluntary	suspension	and	recall	of	certain	products	during	2008	and	by	the reintroduction	of	wound	debridement	products	in	2009.

# Cost	of	Products	Sold

Gross	margin	in	2009	was	unchanged	compared	to	2008.	Manufacturing	costs	per	unit	increased	in	2009	due	to	lower	production	levels.	Excess	inventory	and	obsolescence	charges	increased	in	2009	as	a	result	of	certain	product- specific	matters	and	new	product	launches.	These	costs	were	offset	by	foreign	currency	hedge	gains	recognized	in	the	2009	period	compared	to	hedge	losses	recognized	in	2008.

Under	our	hedging	program,	for	derivatives	which	qualify	as	hedges	of	future	cash	flows,	the	effective	portion	of	changes	in	fair	value	is	temporarily	recorded	in	other	comprehensive	income	and	then	recognized	in	cost	of	products sold	when	the	hedged	item	affects	earnings.

The	following	table	reconciles	the	gross	margin	for	2008	to	2009:

| Year	ended	December	31,	2008	gross	margin | 75.8% |
| :--- | :--- |
| Increased\tunit\tmanufacturing\tcosts | (1.7) |
| Excess\tand\tobsolete\tinventory | (0.4) |
| Foreign\tcurrency\texchange\timpact,\tnet | 2.0 |
| Other | 0.1 |
| Year\tended\tDecember\t31,\t2009\tgross\tmargin | 75.8% |

# Operating	Expenses

Research	and	development	expense,	or	R&D,	increased	to	$205.4	million	in	2009	from	$192.3	million	in	2008.	This	increase	reflects	additional	spending	on	certain	development,	clinical	and	external	research	activities	throughout 2009	in	contrast	to	the	delay	in	activities	experienced	in	2008	as	we	implemented	our	enhanced	compliance	program.

Selling,	general	and	administrative	expense,	or	SG&A,	increased	to	$1,729.2	million	in	2009,	from	$1,704.0	million	in	2008.	This	is	an	increase	of	approximately	90	basis	points	compared	to	the	prior	year.	SG&A	expense	in	the	2008 period	included	approximately	$60	million	of	incremental	costs,	such	as	monitor	fees	and	consulting	and	legal	fees	associated	with	the	global	roll-out	of	our	enhanced	compliance	program.	The	savings	from	these	costs	in	2009	have	been offset	by	increased	spending	to	fund	enhanced	medical	education	programs,	Abbott	Spine	costs	and	increased	product	liability	claims.	In	this	challenging	economic	environment,	we	are	carefully	managing	our	SG&A	spend,	reducing expenses	in	certain	areas	in	order	to	fund	growth	and	productivity	initiatives.	Areas	of	investment	include	marketing	and	promotion	and	medical	education	and	training.	The	acquisition	of	Abbott	Spine	increased	SG&A	costs	for	items	such as	selling	expenses,	increased	instrument	depreciation	and	amortization	of	the	acquired	intangible	assets.	Additionally,	SG&A	as	a	percentage	of	net	sales	is	negatively	impacted	by	the	decrease	in	revenues	caused	by	changes	in	foreign currency	rates.	A	majority	of	our	SG&A	spend	is	incurred	in	the	U.S.,	primarily	from	our	corporate	headquarters	and	similar	functions	at	our	various	businesses	such	as	Dental,	Trauma,	Spine	and	OSP.	Therefore,	SG&A	expense	does	not respond	to	changes	in	foreign	currency	rates	proportionally	to	our	revenue,	which	has	caused	SG&A	as	a	percentage	of	net	sales	to	increase.

Certain	claims	expense	is	a	provision	for	estimated	Durom	Cup	patients	undergoing	revision	surgeries	within	specified	times.	A	provision	of	$69.0	million	was	originally	recorded	during	2008	with	an	additional	$35.0	million recorded	during	2009,	bringing	the	total	provision	to	$104.0	million	for	these	claims.	For	more	information	regarding	these	claims,	see	Note	17	to	the	consolidated	financial	statements.

In	connection	with	our	annual	goodwill	impairment	test	performed	in	the	fourth	quarter	of	2009,	we	noted	that	the	carrying	value	of	the	assets	of	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit	was	in	excess	of	its	estimated	fair	value.	As	a	result,	we recorded	a	related	goodwill	impairment	charge	of	$73.0	million	during	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009.	For	more	information	regarding	goodwill	impairment	and	the	factors	that	led	to	the	impairment,	see	Note	8	to	the	consolidated financial	statements.	We	have	five	other	reporting	units	with	goodwill	assigned	to	them.	We	estimate	the	fair	value	of	those	reporting	units	using	the	income	approach	by	discounting	to	present	value	the	estimated	future	cash	flows	of	the reporting	unit.	For	each	of	those	five	reporting	units,	the	estimated	fair	value	substantially	exceeds	its	carrying	value.

Acquisition,	integration,	realignment	and	other	expenses	for	2009	were	$75.3	million	compared	to	$68.5	million	in	2008.	During	2009,	we	initiated	a	workforce	realignment,	which	included	the	elimination	of	positions	in	some	areas and	increases	in	others	to	support	long-term	growth.	As	a	result	of	this	realignment	and	headcount	reductions	from	acquisitions,	we	incurred	approximately	$19.0	million	of	severance	and	termination-related	expenses.	Other	items	in acquisition,	integration,	realignment	and	other	expenses	in	2009	included	approximately	$9.4	million	of	expenses	related	to	contract	termination	costs,	$23.4	million	of	certain	litigation	matters	that	were	recognized	during	the	period	and various	costs	incurred	to	integrate	the	Abbott	Spine	business	acquired	in	the	fourth	quarter	of	2008.	Included	in	acquisition,	integration,	realignment	and	other	expenses	in	2008	was	$38.5	million	of	in-process	research	and	development related	to	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition	and	other	costs	related	to	the	integration	of	Abbott	Spine.	See	Note	2	to	the	consolidated	financial	statements	for	a	more	complete	description	of	these	charges.

We	recognized	a	net	curtailment	and	settlement	gain	of	$32.1	million	during	2009	related	to	amending	our	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	postretirement	benefit	plans.	For	more	information	regarding	the	net	curtailment	and	settlement	gain, see	Note	12	to	the	consolidated	financial	statements.

# Operating	Profit,	Income	Taxes	and	Net	Earnings

Operating	profit	for	2009	decreased	7	percent	to	$1,018.8	million	from	$1,090.0	million	in	2008.	The	decrease	in	operating	profit	is	due	to	higher	operating	expenses,	most	notably	the	goodwill	impairment	charge.

Interest	and	other	expense	for	2009	increased	to	$20.6	million	compared	to	income	of	$31.8	million	in	2008.	Interest	and	other	income	in	2008	included	a	realized	gain	of	$38.8	million	related	to	the	sale	of	certain	marketable securities.	Interest	expense	increased	in	the	2009	period	as	the	result	of	increased	long-term	debt	used	to	partially	fund	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition	and	the	$1.0	billion	senior	notes	offering	during	2009.

The	effective	tax	rate	on	earnings	before	income	taxes	increased	to	28.1	percent	for	2009,	up	from	24.3	percent	in	2008.	The	effective	tax	rate	for	2009	is	negatively	impacted	by	the	goodwill	impairment	charge	of	$73.0	million recorded	during	2009	for	which	no	tax	benefit	was	recorded.	The	effective	tax	rate	for	2008	includes	the	impact	of	a	current	tax	benefit	of	$31.7	million	related	to	the	2007	settlement	expense,	resulting	in	a	decrease	of	approximately 3	percent	in	the	2008	effective	tax	rate.	This	impact	on	the	2008	effective	tax	rate	was	partially	offset	by	Abbott	Spine	acquisition-related	in-process	research	and	development	charges	recorded	during	2008	for	which	no	tax	benefit	was recorded.	These	discrete	items	account	for	the	majority	of	the	change	in	our	effective	tax	rate	year-over-year.

Net	earnings	decreased	15	percent	to	$717.4	million	for	2009,	compared	to	$848.6	million	in	2008,	as	a	result	of	decreased	operating	profit,	increased	interest	expense	and	an	increased	effective	tax	rate.	Basic	earnings	per	share	in 2009	decreased	10	percent	to	$3.34	from	$3.73	in	2008.	Diluted	earnings	per	share	decreased	11	percent	to	$3.32	from	$3.72	in	2008.	The	disproportional	change	in	earnings	per	share	as	compared	to	net	earnings	is	attributed	to	the	effect	of 2009	and	2008	share	repurchases.

|  | Year	Ended	December	31, | Year	Ended	December	31, |  | Volume/ |  | Foreign |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | 2008 | 2007 | %\tInc | Mix | Price | Exchange |
| Americas | $2,353.9 | $2,277.0 | 3% | 3% | –% | –% |
| Europe | 1,179.1 | 1,081.0 | 9 | 4 | – | 5 |
| Asia\tPacific | 588.1 | 539.5 | 9 | 5 | (3) | 7 |
| Total | $4,121.1 | $3,897.5 | 6 | 3 | – | 3 |

The	NexGen	Complete	Knee	Solution	product	line,	including	Gender	Solutions	Knee	Femoral	Implants,	the	NexGen	LPS-Flex	Knee,	the	NexGen	CR-Flex	Knee	and	the	NexGen	LCCK	Revision	Knee,	led	knee	sales.	In	addition,	the Zimmer	Unicompartmental	High-Flex	Knee	and	the	Gender	Solutions	Natural-Knee	Flex	System	exhibited	strong	growth.	Changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	positively	affected	knee	sales	by	5	percent	in	Europe	and	by	6	percent	in Asia	Pacific.

The	continued	conversion	to	porous	stems,	including	the	Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Stem,	the	Zimmer	M/L	Taper	Stem	with	Kinectiv	Technology,	the	CLS	Spotorno	Stem	from	the	CLS	Hip	System	and	the	Alloclassic	Zweymüller	Hip	Stem, led	hip	stem	sales,	but	those	sales	were	partially	offset	by	weaker	sales	of	cemented	stems.	Trabecular	Metal	Acetabular	Cups	and	Longevity	Highly	Crosslinked	Polyethylene	Liners	also	had	strong	growth.	The	temporary	suspension	of marketing	and	distribution	of	the	Durom	Cup	in	the	U.S.	negatively	impacted	hip	sales	growth.	Changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	positively	affected	hip	sales	by	5	percent	in	Europe	and	by	8	percent	in	Asia	Pacific.

The	Bigliani/Flatow	Complete	Shoulder	Solution	and	the	Zimmer	Trabecular	Metal	Reverse	Shoulder	System	led	extremities	sales.

Orthobiologicals	and	prosthetic	implants,	including	strong	growth	of	the	Tapered	Screw-Vent	Implant	System,	led	dental	sales.

Zimmer	Periarticular	Locking	Plates	and	the	ITST		Intertrochanteric/Subtrochanteric	Fixation	System	led	trauma	sales.

The	Dynesys	Dynamic	Stabilization	System	and	the	Trinica	Select	Anterior	Cervical	Plate	System	led	spine	sales,	which	also	reflect	an	increase	as	a	result	of	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition.

OSP	sales	were	negatively	affected	by	the	patient	care	product	recalls	and	related	voluntary	suspension	of	production	of	certain	products,	but	these	negative	factors

were	partially	offset	by	strong	growth	in	PALACOS	Bone	Cement.

# Expenses	as	a	Percent	of	Net	Sales

|  | 2008 | 2007 | Inc	(Dec) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cost\tof\tproducts\tsold | 24.2% | 22.5% | 1.7 |
| Research\tand\tdevelopment | 4.7 | 4.7 | – |
| Selling,\tgeneral\tand\tadministrative | 41.3 | 38.9 | 2.4 |
| Settlement | – | 4.4 | (4.4) |
| Certain\tclaims | 1.7 | – | 1.7 |
| Acquisition,\tintegration,\trealignment\tand\tother | 1.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Operating\texpenses | 49.3 | 48.6 | 0.7 |
| Operating\tprofit | 26.5 | 28.9 | (2.4) |
| Interest\tand\tother\tincome,\tnet | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.7 |

Gross	margin	decreased	in	2008	primarily	due	to	the	unfavorable	effect	of	year-over-year	changes	in	foreign	currency	hedge	gains	and	losses	as	well	as	an	increase	in	excess	inventory	and	obsolescence	charges	due	to	write-offs related	to	the	OSP	patient	care	product	recalls	and	increased	inventory	levels	as	a	result	of	lower	than	forecasted	sales.	Inventory	step-up	related	to	the	completion	of	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition	during	2008	also	had	an	unfavorable	impact on	gross	margin.

| Year	ended	December	31,	2007	gross	margin | 77.5% |
| :--- | :--- |
| Foreign\tcurrency\texchange\timpact,\tnet | (0.8) |
| Excess\tand\tobsolete\tinventory | (0.6) |
| Inventory\tstep-up | (0.2) |
| Other | (0.1) |
| Year\tended\tDecember\t31,\t2008\tgross\tmargin | 75.8% |

R&D	increased	to	$192.3	million	for	2008	from	$182.6	million	in	2007	but	remained	unchanged	as	a	percent	of	total	sales.	The	year-over-year	increase	represents	our	continued	investment	in	R&D	to	grow	at	or	above	sales	growth.

SG&A	expense	increased	to	$1,704.0	million	for	2008	from	$1,516.7	million	in	2007.	Increased	SG&A	costs	include	monitor	fees	paid	as	part	of	our	2007	civil	settlement	with	the	U.S.	government	regarding	financial	relationships with	consulting	orthopaedic	surgeons,	as	well	as	consulting	and	legal	fees	associated	with	the	global	implementation	of	our	enhanced	compliance	initiatives.	Expenses	related	to	other	operating	initiatives	also	caused	an	increase	in	SG&A	as	a percentage	of	net	sales.	Such	operating	initiatives	include	the	planned	implementation	of	a	global	IT	system	and	improving	quality	systems	at	our	Dover	facility.	Additionally,	selling	costs	increased	as	a	result	of	the	ORTHOsoft	acquisition, an	increase	in	the	headcount	of	our	sales	force	in	certain	locations,	increased	commission	incentives	to	sell	certain	key	products	and	a	change	in	the	mix	of	commissions	earned	as	a	result	of	lower	OSP	sales.

Settlement	expense	of	$169.5	million	for	2007	relates	to	the	payment	we	made	as	part	of	the	2007	civil	settlement.

Certain	claims	expense	of	$69.0	million	is	a	provision	for	estimated	claims	from	Durom	Cup	patients	undergoing	revision	surgeries	within	specified	periods.	For	more	information	regarding	these	claims,	see	Note	17	to	the consolidated	financial	statements.

Acquisition,	integration	and	other	expenses	increased	to	$68.5	million	for	2008,	compared	to	$25.2	million	in	2007.	The	acquisition,	integration	and	other	expenses	recorded	during	2008	include	$38.5	million	for	in-process	research and	development	related	to	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition,	costs	related	to	the	integration	of	Abbott	Spine,	facility	consolidation	costs,	legal	fees	and	retention	and	termination	payments,	partially	offset	by	favorable	adjustments	to	certain liabilities	of	acquired	companies.	The	acquisition,	integration	and	other	expenses	recorded	during	2007	reflect	in-process	research	and	development	write-offs	related	to	acquisitions,	costs	related	to	the	integration	of	acquired U.S.	distributors,	estimated	settlements	for	certain	pre-acquisition	product	liability	claims,	integration	consulting	fees	and	costs	for	integrating	information	technology	systems.	See	Note	2	to	the	consolidated	financial	statements	for	a	more complete	description	of	these	charges.

Operating	profit	for	2008	decreased	3	percent	to	$1,090.0	million	from	$1,127.6	million	in	2007.	Operating	profit	for	2007	included	the	effect	of	the	non-recurring	settlement	expense	of	$169.5	million.	Excluding	the	impact	of	the settlement	expense	in	2007,	operating	profit	for	2008	would	still	have	been	unfavorable	compared	to	2007	as	a	result	of	lower	gross	margins,	increases	in	SG&A	costs	attributable	to	the	implementation	of	our	enhanced	compliance	initiatives and	certain	claims	expense	of	$69.0	million.

Interest	and	other	income	for	2008	increased	to	$31.8	million	from	$4.0	million	in	2007.	Interest	and	other	income	for	2008	includes	a	realized	gain	of	$38.8	million	related	to	the	sale	of	certain	marketable	securities,	partially	offset by	increased	interest	expense	as	a	result	of	an	increase	in	outstanding	long-term	debt.

The	effective	tax	rate	on	earnings	before	income	taxes	decreased	to	24.3	percent	for	2008,	down	from	31.6	percent	in	2007.	The	effective	tax	rate	for	the	2007	period	reflects	the	effect	of	the	$169.5	million	settlement	expense	for which	no	tax	benefit	had	previously	been	recognized.	During	2008,	we	recorded	a	current	tax	benefit	of	$31.7	million	related	to	the	settlement	expense,	resulting	in	a	decrease	of	approximately	3	percent	to	the	current	period	effective	tax rate.	The	effective	tax	rate	for	2008	was	further	reduced	as	a	result	of	increased	profits	in	lower	tax	jurisdictions.	These	decreases	in	the	effective	tax	rate	were	partially	offset	by	Abbott	Spine	acquisition-related	in-process	research	and development

charges	recorded	during	2008	for	which	no	tax	benefit	was	recorded.

Net	earnings	increased	10	percent	to	$848.6	million	for	2008	compared	to	$773.2	million	in	2007,	as	the	decrease	in	operating	profit	was	more	than	offset	by	favorable	items	in	interest	and	other	income	and	a	lower	effective	tax	rate. Basic	and	diluted	earnings	per	share	increased	14	percent	to	$3.73	and	$3.72,	respectively,	from	$3.28	and	$3.26	in	2007.	The	higher	growth	rate	in	earnings	per	share	as	compared	to	net	earnings	is	attributed	to	the	effect	of	2008	and 2007	share	repurchases.

# LIQUIDITY	AND	CAPITAL	RESOURCES

Cash	flows	provided	by	operating	activities	were	$1,117.5	million	in	2009	compared	to	$1,038.1	million	in	2008.	The	principal	source	of	cash	from	operating	activities	in	2009	was	net	earnings.	Non-cash	charges	included	in	net earnings	accounted	for	another	$446.4	million	of	operating	cash.	All	other	items	of	operating	cash	flows	in	2009	reflect	a	use	of	$46.3	million	of	cash.	The	resolution	of	outstanding	payments	to	healthcare	professionals	and	institutions resulted	in	increased	cash	outflows	during	the	2009	period	compared	to	the	delay	in	similar	payments	during	the	2008	period	as	we	implemented	our	enhanced	global	compliance	program.	The	resolution	of	these	outstanding	payments,	along with	a	change	in	the	timing	of	employee	bonus	payments	compared	to	the	2008	period	and	product	liability	payments,	contributed	to	increased	outflows	from	accrued	expenses	in	2009.	These	outflows	were	partially	offset	by	improved accounts	receivable	collections	and	better	inventory	management.

At	December	31,	2009,	we	had	56	days	of	sales	outstanding	in	trade	accounts	receivable,	a	decrease	of	3	days	when	compared	to	December	31,	2008,	reflecting	improved	collections	across	all	geographic	segments.	At	December	31, 2009,	we	had	302	days	of	inventory	on	hand,	a	decrease	of	42	days	compared	to	December	31,	2008.	Over	the	past	two	years	we	have	made	significant	investments	in	inventory,	including	investments	in	response	to	growing	demand	for systems	that	provide	more	versatility	and	better	fit	for	patients.	In	2009	we	made	progress	rationalizing	these	investments	through	reductions	in	field-based	consignments	and	through	the	use	of	new	inventory	management	tools	to	speed returns	and	redeployments.	The	continued	build	out	of	pipeline	inventory	for	planned	product	launches	should	partially	offset	these	reductions	in	field	consignments	in	2010.

Cash	flows	used	in	investing	activities	were	$381.2	million	in	2009	compared	to	$924.2	million	in	2008.	Additions	to	instruments	decreased	in	2009	compared	to	the	2008	period,	as	year-over-year	spending	on	instruments	declined compared	to	the	significant	investments	made	in	2008.	In	2010,	we	expect	to	spend	approximately	$170	–	$180	million	on	instruments	to	support	new	products	and	sales	growth.	Spending	on	other	property,	plant	and	equipment	decreased	to $105.1	million	during	2009	compared	to	$250.0	million	in	the	same	2008	period.	Spending	on	property,	plant	and	equipment	decreased	compared	to	2008	levels,	as	certain	planned	infrastructure	initiatives	from	2008	were	completed	and	as we	adjusted	spending	to	lower	production	volumes.	During	2010,	we	expect	to	purchase	approximately	$150	–	$160	million	in	other	property,	plant	and	equipment,	reflecting	the	cash	outlays	necessary	to	complete	new	product-related investments	and	normal	replacement	of	older	machinery	and	equipment.	Acquired	intellectual	property	rights	were	$35.8	million	in	2009	compared	to	$109.4	million	in	2008.	These	items	relate	to	lump-sum	payments	made	to	certain healthcare	professionals	and	institutions	in	place	of	future	royalty	payments	that	otherwise	would	have	been	due	under	the	terms	of	existing	contractual	arrangements.	These	lump-sum	payments	were	based	upon	a	third	party	fair	market valuation	of	the	current	net	present	value	of	the	contractual	arrangements.	During	2009	we	invested	excess	cash	of	approximately	$66.4	million	in	certificates	of	deposit	that	have	original	maturities	greater	than	90	days.	Investments	in	other assets	in	both	2009	and	2008	primarily	relate	to	payments	to	acquire	certain	foreign-based	distributors.	Investments	in	other	assets	in	2007	primarily	related	to	payments	to	acquire	Endius	and	ORTHOsoft.	Included	in	investing	cash	flows	in 2008	were	$363.0	million	paid	to	acquire	Abbott	Spine	and	$54.9	million	of	proceeds	we	received	from	the	sale	of	certain	equity	securities.

Cash	flows	used	in	financing	activities	were	$262.1	million	for	2009	compared	to	$343.5	million	in	2008.	In	November	2009,	we	sold	$1.0	billion	aggregate	principal	amount	of	senior	unsecured	notes	(Senior	Notes)	in	a	public offering.	We	received	net	proceeds	of	approximately	$998.8	million,	net	of	an	offering	discount	of	$1.2	million.	We	also	paid	an	additional	$8.5	million	of	debt	issuance	costs	related	to	the	sale	of	the	Senior	Notes.	The	proceeds	of	the offering	were	used	to	repay	amounts	outstanding	under	our	senior	credit	facility,	to	finance	our	stock	repurchase	program	and	for	general	corporate	purposes.	We	repurchased	$923.7	million	of	our	common	stock	in	2009	as	compared	with $737.0	million	in	2008	under	our	stock	repurchase	programs.

The	Senior	Notes	include	two	tranches:	$500	million	aggregate	principal	amount	of	4.625%	Senior	Notes	due	November	30,	2019,	and	$500	million	aggregate	principal	amount	of	5.75%	Senior	Notes	due	November	30,	2039.

Interest	on	the	Senior	Notes	is	payable	on	May	30	and	November	30	of	each	year	beginning	on	May	30,	2010	until	maturity.	The	Senior	Notes	are	rated	A-	by	Standard	&	Poor's	Ratings	Services	and	are	rated	Baa1	by	Moody's	Investors' Service,	Inc.

We	may	redeem	the	Senior	Notes	at	our	election	in	whole	or	in	part	at	any	time	prior	to	maturity	at	a	redemption	price	equal	to	the	greater	of	1)	100	percent	of	the	principal	amount	of	the	notes	being	redeemed;	or	2)	the	sum	of	the present	values	of	the	remaining	scheduled	payments	of	principal	and	interest	(not	including	any	portion	of	such	payments	of	interest	accrued	as	of	the	date	of	redemption),	discounted	to	the	date	of	redemption	on	a	semi-annual	basis	at	the Treasury	Rate	(as	defined	in	the	debt	agreement),	plus	20	basis	points,	in	the	case	of	the	2019	notes,	and	25	basis	points,	in	the	case	of	the	2039	notes.	We	will	also	pay	the	accrued	and	unpaid	interest	on	the	Senior	Notes	to	the	redemption date.

We	have	a	five	year	$1,350	million	revolving,	multi-currency,	senior	unsecured	credit	facility	maturing	November	30,	2012	(Senior	Credit	Facility).	We	had	$128.8	million	outstanding	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	at December	31,	2009,	and	an	availability	of	$1,221.2	million.	The	Senior	Credit	Facility	contains	provisions	by	which	we	can	increase	the	line	to	$1,750	million.

We	also	have	available	uncommitted	credit	facilities	totaling	$84.1	million.

We	may	use	excess	cash	or	further	borrow	against	our	Senior	Credit	Facility,	subject	to	limits	set	by	our	Board	of	Directors,	to	repurchase	additional	common	stock	under	the	$1.25	billion	program	which	expires	December	31,	2010. Approximately	$211.1	million	remains	authorized	for	future	repurchases	under	this	plan.

Management	believes	that	cash	flows	from	operations	and	available	borrowings	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	are	sufficient	to	meet	our	expected	working	capital,	capital	expenditure	and	debt	service	needs.	Should	investment opportunities	arise,	we	believe	that	our	earnings,	balance	sheet	and	cash	flows	will	allow	us	to	obtain	additional	capital,	if	necessary.

# CONTRACTUAL	OBLIGATIONS

We	have	entered	into	contracts	with	various	third	parties	in	the	normal	course	of	business	which	will	require	future	payments.	The	following	table	illustrates	our	contractual	obligations	(in	millions):

| Contractual	Obligations | Total | 2010 | 2011<br>and<br>2012 | 2013<br>and<br>2014 | 2015<br>and<br>Thereafter |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Long-term\tdebt | $1,127.6 | $– | $128.8 | $– | $998.8 |
| Interest\tpayments | 1,095.6 | 53.7 | 103.8 | 103.8 | 834.3 |
| Operating\tleases | 134.6 | 37.3 | 47.6 | 26.6 | 23.1 |
| Purchase\tobligations | 33.0 | 27.8 | 5.1 | 0.1 | – |
| Long-term\tincome\ttaxes\tpayable | 94.3 | – | 56.5 | 15.3 | 22.5 |
| Other\tlong-term\tliabilities | 234.2 | – | 81.7 | 26.2 | 126.3 |
| Total\tcontractual\tobligations | $2,719.3 | $118.8 | $423.5 | $172.0 | $2,005.0 |

# CRITICAL	ACCOUNTING	ESTIMATES

Our	financial	results	are	affected	by	the	selection	and	application	of	accounting	policies	and	methods.	Significant	accounting	policies	which	require	management's	judgment	are	discussed	below.

Excess	Inventory	and	Instruments	–	We	must	determine	as	of	each	balance	sheet	date	how	much,	if	any,	of	our	inventory	may	ultimately	prove	to	be	unsaleable	or	unsaleable	at	our	carrying	cost.	Similarly,	we	must	also determine	if	instruments	on	hand	will	be	put	to	productive	use	or	remain	undeployed	as	a	result	of	excess	supply.	Reserves	are	established	to	effectively	adjust	inventory	and	instruments	to	net	realizable	value.	To	determine	the	appropriate level	of	reserves,	we	evaluate	current	stock	levels	in	relation	to	historical	and	expected	patterns	of	demand	for	all	of	our	products	and	instrument	systems	and	components.	The	basis	for	the	determination	is	generally	the	same	for	all inventory	and	instrument	items	and	categories	except	for	work-in-progress	inventory,	which	is	recorded	at	cost.	Obsolete	or	discontinued	items	are	generally	destroyed	and	completely	written	off.	Management	evaluates	the	need	for	changes to	valuation	reserves	based	on	market	conditions,	competitive	offerings	and	other	factors	on	a	regular	basis.

Income	Taxes	–	Our	income	tax	expense,	deferred	tax	assets	and	liabilities	and	reserves	for	unrecognized	tax	benefits	reflect	management's	best	assessment	of	estimated	future	taxes	to	be	paid.	We	are	subject	to	income taxes	in	both	the	U.S.	and	numerous	foreign	jurisdictions.	Significant	judgments	and	estimates	are	required	in	determining	the	consolidated	income	tax	expense.

We	estimate	income	tax	expense	and	income	tax	liabilities	and	assets	by	taxable	jurisdiction.	Realization	of	deferred	tax	assets	in	each	taxable	jurisdiction	is	dependent	on	our	ability	to	generate	future	taxable	income	sufficient	to realize	the	benefits.	We	evaluate	deferred	tax	assets	on	an	ongoing	basis	and	provide	valuation	allowances	if	it	is	determined	to	be	"more	likely	than	not"	that	the	deferred	tax	benefit	will	not	be	realized.	Federal	income	taxes	are	provided	on the	portion	of	the	income	of	foreign	subsidiaries	that	is	expected	to	be	remitted	to	the	U.S.

The	calculation	of	our	tax	liabilities	involves	dealing	with	uncertainties	in	the	application	of	complex	tax	laws	and	regulations	in	a	multitude	of	jurisdictions	across	our	global	operations.	We	are	subject	to	regulatory	review	or	audit	in virtually	all	of	those	jurisdictions	and	those	reviews	and	audits	may	require	extended	periods	of	time	to	resolve.	We	record	our	income	tax	provisions	based	on	our	knowledge	of	all	relevant	facts	and	circumstances,	including	existing	tax laws,	our	experience	with	previous	settlement	agreements,	the	status	of	current	examinations	and	our	understanding	of	how	the	tax	authorities	view	certain	relevant	industry	and	commercial	matters.

We	recognize	tax	liabilities	in	accordance	with	the	Financial	Accounting	Standards	Board's	(FASB)	guidance	on	income	taxes	and	we	adjust	these	liabilities	when	our	judgment	changes	as	a	result	of	the	evaluation	of	new information	not	previously	available.	Due	to	the	complexity	of	some	of	these	uncertainties,	the	ultimate	resolution	may	result	in	a	payment	that	is	materially	different	from	our	current	estimate	of	the	tax	liabilities.	These	differences	will	be reflected	as	increases	or	decreases	to	income	tax	expense	in	the	period	in	which	they	are	determined.

Commitments	and	Contingencies	–	Accruals	for	product	liability	and	other	claims	are	established	with	the	assistance	of	internal	and	external	legal	counsel	based	on	current	information	and	historical	settlement	information for	claims,	related	legal	fees	and	for	claims	incurred	but	not	reported.	We	use	an	actuarial	model	to	assist	management	in	determining	an	appropriate	level	of	accruals	for	product	liability	claims.	Historical	patterns	of	claim	loss	development

over	time	are	statistically	analyzed	to	arrive	at	factors	which	are	then	applied	to	loss	estimates	in	the	actuarial	model.	During	2009,	in	addition	to	our	general	product	liability	estimates	and	the	$69.0	million	provision	recorded	in	2008	related to	the	Durom	Cup,	we	recorded	an	additional	provision	for	certain	claims	of	$35.0	million	representing	management's	updated	estimate	of	liability	to	Durom	Cup	patients	undergoing	revisions	associated	with	surgeries	occurring	before	July 2008	and	within	two	years	of	the	original	surgery	date.	These	parameters	are	consistent	with	our	data	which	indicates	that	cup	loosenings	associated	with	surgical	technique	are	most	likely	to	occur	within	that	time	period.	We	expect	to	pay the	majority	of	these	claims	within	the	next	three	years.	Any	claims	received	outside	of	these	defined	parameters	will	be	managed	in	the	normal	course	and	reflected	in	our	standard	product	liability	accruals.

Goodwill	and	Intangible	Assets	–	We	evaluate	the	carrying	value	of	goodwill	and	indefinite	life	intangible	assets	annually,	or	whenever	events	or	circumstances	indicate	the	carrying	value	may	not	be	recoverable.	We evaluate	the	carrying	value	of	finite	life	intangible	assets	whenever	events	or	circumstances	indicate	the	carrying	value	may	not	be	recoverable.	Significant	assumptions	are	required	to	estimate	the	fair	value	of	goodwill	and	intangible	assets, most	notably	estimated	future	cash	flows	generated	by	these	assets.	As	such,	these	fair	valuation	measurements	use	significant	unobservable	inputs.	Changes	to	these	assumptions	could	require	us	to	record	impairment	charges	on	these assets.

In	the	fourth	quarter	of	2009,	we	determined	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit's	carrying	value	was	in	excess	of	its	estimated	fair	value.	Fair	value	was	determined	using	an	equal	weighting	of	income	and	market	approaches.	Fair	value under	the	income	approach	was	determined	by	discounting	to	present	value	the	estimated	future	cash	flows	of	the	reporting	unit.	Fair	value	under	the	market	approach	utilized	the	comparable	transaction	methodology,	which	uses	valuation indicators	determined	from	sales	of	other	businesses	that	are	similar	to	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit.	Factors	that	contributed	to	the	estimated	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit	being	below	its	carrying	value	included	a	decrease	in	projected revenues	related	to	the	Dynesys	Dynamic	Stabilization	System.	This	product	line	experienced	increased	competition	and	insurance	reimbursement	issues	in	2009.	We	have	been	seeking	approval	from	the	FDA	to	market	this	product differently	in	the	U.S.,	which	would	enhance	its	position	in	the	market.	However,	in	November	2009	an	FDA	advisory	panel	issued	a	non-approvable	recommendation,	increasing	the	uncertainty	of	the	estimated	future	cash	flows.	In	addition to	the	Dynesys	product,	revenues	from	other	products	have	been	affected	as	we	work	through	the	integration	of	the	sales	channel	following	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition.

As	a	result,	we	recorded	a	related	goodwill	impairment	charge	of	$73.0	million	during	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009.

We	have	five	other	reporting	units	with	goodwill	assigned	to	them.	We	estimate	the	fair	value	of	those	reporting	units	using	the	income	approach	by	discounting	to	present	value	the	estimated	future	cash	flows	of	the	reporting	unit. For	each	of	those	five	reporting	units,	the	estimated	fair	value	substantially	exceeds	its	carrying	value.

Share-based	Payment	–	We	measure	share-based	payment	expense	at	the	grant	date	based	on	the	fair	value	of	the	award	and	recognize	expense	over	the	requisite	service	period.	Determining	the	fair	value	of	share-based awards	at	the	grant	date	requires	judgment,	including	estimating	the	expected	life	of	stock	options	and	the	expected	volatility	of	our	stock.	Additionally,	we	must	estimate	the	amount	of	share-based	awards	that	are	expected	to	be	forfeited. We	estimate	expected	volatility	based	upon	the	implied	volatility	of	our	actively	traded	options.	The	expected	life	of	stock	options	and	estimated	forfeitures	are	based	upon	our	employees'	historical	exercise	and	forfeiture	behaviors.	The assumptions	used	in	determining	the	grant	date	fair	value	and	the	expected	forfeitures	represent	management's	best	estimates.

# RECENT	ACCOUNTING	PRONOUNCEMENTS

Information	about	recent	accounting	pronouncements	is	included	in	Note	2	to	the	Consolidated	Financial	Statements,	which	are	included	in	this	report	under	Item	8.

# MARKET	RISK

We	are	exposed	to	certain	market	risks	as	part	of	our	ongoing	business	operations,	including	risks	from	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates,	interest	rates	and	commodity	prices	that	could	affect	our	financial	condition,	results of	operations	and	cash	flows.	We	manage	our	exposure	to	these	and	other	market	risks	through	regular	operating	and	financing	activities	and	through	the	use	of	derivative	financial	instruments.	We	use	derivative	financial	instruments	solely as	risk	management	tools	and	not	for	speculative	investment	purposes.

# FOREIGN	CURRENCY	EXCHANGE	RISK

We	operate	on	a	global	basis	and	are	exposed	to	the	risk	that	our	financial	condition,	results	of	operations	and	cash	flows	could	be	adversely	affected	by	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates.	We	are	primarily	exposed	to	foreign currency	exchange	rate	risk	with	respect	to	transactions	and	net	assets	denominated	in	Euros,	Swiss	Francs,	Japanese	Yen,	British	Pounds,	Canadian	Dollars,	Australian	Dollars,	Korean	Won	and	Swedish	Krona.	We	manage	the	foreign currency	exposure	centrally,	on	a	combined	basis,	which	allows	us	to	net	exposures	and	to	take	advantage	of	any	natural	offsets.	To	reduce	the	uncertainty	of	foreign	currency	exchange	rate	movements	on	transactions	denominated	in	foreign currencies,	we	enter	into	derivative	financial	instruments	in	the	form	of	foreign	currency	exchange	forward	contracts	and	options	with	major	financial	institutions.	These	forward	contracts	and	options	are	designed	to	hedge	anticipated foreign	currency	transactions,	primarily	intercompany	sale	and	purchase	transactions,	for	periods	consistent	with	commitments.	Realized	and	unrealized	gains	and	losses	on	these	contracts	and	options	that	qualify	as	cash	flow	hedges	are temporarily	recorded	in	other	comprehensive	income,	then	recognized	in	cost	of	products	sold	when	the	hedged	item	affects	net	earnings.

For	contracts	outstanding	at	December	31,	2009,	we	had	obligations	to	purchase	U.S.	Dollars	and	sell	Euros,	Japanese	Yen,	British	Pounds,	Canadian	Dollars,	Australian	Dollars,	Korean	Won	and	Swedish	Krona	and	purchase	Swiss Francs	and	sell	U.S.	Dollars	at	set	maturity	dates	ranging	from	January	2010	through	June	2012.	The	notional	amounts	of	outstanding	forward	contracts	entered	into	with	third	parties	to	purchase	U.S.	Dollars	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008 were	$1.1	billion	and	$1.3	billion,	respectively.	The	notional	amounts	of	outstanding	forward	contracts	entered	into	with	third	parties	to	purchase	Swiss	Francs	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008	were	$202.4	million	and	$207.5	million, respectively.	The	weighted	average	contract	rates	outstanding	are	Euro:USD	1.40,	USD:Swiss	Franc	1.10,	USD:Japanese	Yen	94,	British	Pound:USD	1.66,	USD:Canadian	Dollar	1.11,	Australian	Dollar:USD	0.75,	USD:Korean	Won	1,208 and	USD:Swedish	Krona	7.52.

We	maintain	written	policies	and	procedures	governing	our	risk	management	activities.	Our	policy	requires	that	critical	terms	of	hedging	instruments	are	the	same	as	hedged	forecasted	transactions.	On	this	basis,	with	respect	to	cash flow	hedges,	changes	in	cash	flows	attributable	to	hedged	transactions	are	generally	expected	to	be	completely	offset	by	changes	in	the	fair	value	of	hedge	instruments.	As	part	of	our	risk	management	program,	we	also	perform	sensitivity analyses	to	assess	potential	changes	in	revenue,	operating	results,	cash	flows	and	financial	position	relating	to	hypothetical	movements	in	currency	exchange	rates.	A	sensitivity	analysis	of	changes	in	the	fair	value	of	foreign	currency exchange	forward	contracts	outstanding	at	December	31,	2009	indicated	that,	if	the	U.S.	Dollar	uniformly	changed	in	value	by	10	percent	relative	to	the	Euro,	Swiss	Franc,	Japanese	Yen,	British	Pound,	Canadian	Dollar,	Australian	Dollar, Korean	Won	and	Swedish	Krona,	with	no	change	in	the	interest	differentials,	the	fair	value	of	those	contracts	would	increase	or	decrease	earnings	before	income	taxes	in	periods	through	2012,	depending	on	the	direction	of	the	change,	by	an average	approximate	amount	of	$54.9	million,	$20.5	million,	$25.0	million,	$10.2	million,	$4.7	million,	$9.9	million,	$2.9	million	and	$1.8	million	for	the	Euro,	Swiss	Franc,	Japanese	Yen,	British	Pound,	Canadian	Dollar,	Australian Dollar,	Korean	Won	and	Swedish	Krona	contracts,	respectively.	Any	change	in	the	fair	value	of	foreign	currency	exchange	forward	contracts	as	a	result	of	a	fluctuation	in	a	currency	exchange	rate	is	expected	to	be	largely	offset	by	a	change in	the	value	of	the	hedged	transaction.	Consequently,	foreign	currency	exchange	contracts	would	not	subject	us	to	material	risk	due	to	exchange	rate	movements	because	gains	and	losses	on	these	contracts	offset	gains	and	losses	on	the assets,	liabilities	and	transactions	being	hedged.

We	had	net	investment	exposures	to	net	foreign	currency	denominated	assets	and	liabilities	of	approximately	$2,346	million	at	December	31,	2009,	primarily	in	Swiss	Francs,	Japanese	Yen	and	Euros.	Approximately	$1,309	million of	the	net	asset	exposure	at	December	31,	2009	relates	to	goodwill	recorded	in	the	Europe	and	Asia	Pacific	geographic	segments.

We	enter	into	foreign	currency	forward	exchange	contracts	with	terms	of	one	month	to	manage	currency	exposures	for	assets	and	liabilities	denominated	in	a	currency	other	than	an	entity's	functional	currency.	As	a	result,	foreign currency	remeasurement	gains/losses	recognized	in	earnings	are	generally	offset	with	gains/losses	on	the	foreign	currency	forward	exchange	contracts	in	the	same	reporting	period.

# COMMODITY	PRICE	RISK

We	purchase	raw	material	commodities	such	as	cobalt	chrome,	titanium,	tantalum,	polymer	and	sterile	packaging.	We	enter	into	supply	contracts	generally	with	terms	of	12	to	24	months,	where	available,	on	these	commodities	to alleviate	the	effect	of	market	fluctuation	in	prices.	As	part	of	our	risk	management	program,	we	perform	sensitivity	analyses	related	to	potential	commodity	price	changes.	A	10	percent	price	change	across	all	these	commodities	would	not have	a

material	effect	on	our	consolidated	financial	position,	results	of	operations	or	cash	flows.

# INTEREST	RATE	RISK

In	the	normal	course	of	business,	we	are	exposed	to	market	risk	from	changes	in	interest	rates	that	could	affect	our	results	of	operations	and	financial	condition.	We	manage	our	exposure	to	interest	rate	risks	through	our	regular operations	and	financing	activities.

Presently,	we	invest	our	cash	and	cash	equivalents	primarily	in	U.S.	government	treasury	funds	and	bank	deposits.	The	primary	investment	objective	is	to	ensure	capital	preservation	of	our	invested	principal	funds	by	limiting	default and	market	risk.	Currently,	we	do	not	use	derivative	financial	instruments	in	our	investment	portfolio.

Our	principal	exposure	to	interest	rate	risk	arises	from	the	variable	rates	associated	with	our	credit	facilities.	Our	Senior	Notes	have	fixed	interest	rates	and	are	not	exposed	to	any	risk	from	movement	in	interest	rates.	We	are	subject	to interest	rate	risk	through	movements	in	interest	rates	on	the	committed	Senior	Credit	Facility	and	our	uncommitted	credit	facilities.	Presently,	all	of	our	debt	outstanding	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	bears	interest	at	short-term	rates.	We currently	do	not	hedge	our	interest	rate	exposure,	but	we	may	do	so	in	the	future.	Based	upon	our	overall	interest	rate	exposure	as	of	December	31,	2009,	a	change	of	10	percent	in	interest	rates,	assuming	the	amount	outstanding	remains constant,	would	not	have	a	material	effect	on	interest	expense.	Further,	this	analysis	does	not	consider	the	effect	of	the	change	in	the	level	of	overall	economic	activity	that	could	exist	in	such	an	environment.

# CREDIT	RISK

Financial	instruments,	which	potentially	subject	us	to	concentrations	of	credit	risk,	are	primarily	cash,	cash	equivalents,	counterparty	transactions	and	accounts	receivable.

We	place	our	investments	in	highly	rated	financial	institutions	and	money	market	instruments	and	limit	the	amount	of	credit	exposure	to	any	one	entity.	We	believe	we	do	not	have	any	significant	credit	risk	on	our	cash	and	cash equivalents	and	investments.

We	are	exposed	to	credit	loss	if	the	financial	institutions	with	which	we	conduct	business	fail	to	perform.	However,	this	loss	is	limited	to	the	amounts,	if	any,	by	which	the	obligations	of	the	counterparty	to	the	financial	instrument contract	exceed	our	obligation.	We	also	minimize	exposure	to	credit	risk	by	dealing	with	a	diversified	group	of	major	financial	institutions.	We	manage	credit	risk	by	monitoring	the	financial	condition	of	our	counterparties	using	standard credit	guidelines.	We	do	not	anticipate	any	nonperformance	by	any	of	the	counterparties.

Concentration	of	credit	risk	with	respect	to	trade	accounts	receivable	is	limited	due	to	the	large	number	of	customers	and	their	dispersion	across	a	number	of	geographic	areas	and	by	frequent	monitoring	of	the	creditworthiness	of	the customers	to	whom	credit	is	granted	in	the	normal	course	of	business.	However,	essentially	all	of	our	trade	receivables	are	concentrated	in	the	public	and	private	hospital	and	healthcare	industry	in	the	U.S.	and	internationally	or	with distributors	or	dealers	who	operate	in	international	markets	and,	accordingly,	are	exposed	to	their	respective	business,	economic	and	country	specific	variables.	Repayment	is	dependent	upon	the	financial	stability	of	these	industry	sectors and	the	respective	countries'	national	economic	and	healthcare	systems.	Exposure	to	credit	risk	is	controlled	through	credit	approvals,	credit	limits	and	monitoring	procedures,	and	we	believe	that	reserves	for	losses	are	adequate.	There	is	no significant	net	exposure	due	to	any	individual	customer	or	other	major	concentration	of	credit	risk.

# Management's	Report	on	Internal	Control	Over	Financial	Reporting

The	management	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	is	responsible	for	establishing	and	maintaining	adequate	internal	control	over	financial	reporting.	Internal	control	over	financial	reporting	is	defined	in	Rules	13a-15(f)	or	15d-15(f) promulgated	under	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934	as	a	process	designed	by,	or	under	the	supervision	of,	the	company's	principal	executive	and	principal	financial	officers	and	effected	by	the	company's	Board	of	Directors, management	and	other	personnel,	to	provide	reasonable	assurance	regarding	the	reliability	of	financial	reporting	and	the	preparation	of	financial	statements	for	external	purposes	in	accordance	with	U.S.	generally	accepted	accounting principles	and	includes	those	policies	and	procedures	that:

•	Pertain	to	the	maintenance	of	records	that	in	reasonable	detail	accurately	and	fairly	reflect	the	transactions	and	dispositions	of	the	assets	of	the	company;

•	Provide	reasonable	assurance	that	transactions	are	recorded	as	necessary	to	permit	preparation	of	financial	statements	in	accordance	with	U.S.	generally	accepted	accounting	principles,	and	that	receipts	and	expenditures	of	the company	are	being	made	only	in	accordance	with	authorizations	of	management	and	directors	of	the	company;	and

•	Provide	reasonable	assurance	regarding	prevention	or	timely	detection	of	unauthorized	acquisition,	use	or	disposition	of	the	company's	assets	that	could	have	a	material	effect	on	the	financial	statements.

Because	of	its	inherent	limitations,	the	company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	may	not	prevent	or	detect	misstatements.	Also,	projections	of	any	evaluation	of	effectiveness	to	future	periods	are	subject	to	the	risk	that controls	may	become	inadequate	because	of	changes	in	conditions,	or	that	the	degree	of	compliance	with	the	policies	or	procedures	may	deteriorate.

The	company's	management	assessed	the	effectiveness	of	the	company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	as	of	December	31,	2009.	In	making	this	assessment,	the	company's	management	used	the	criteria	set	forth	by	the Committee	of	Sponsoring	Organizations	of	the	Treadway	Commission	(COSO)	in	Internal	Control-Integrated	Framework.

Based	on	that	assessment,	management	has	concluded	that,	as	of	December	31,	2009,	the	company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	is	effective	based	on	those	criteria.

The	company's	independent	registered	public	accounting	firm	has	audited	the	effectiveness	of	the	company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	as	of	December	31,	2009,	as	stated	in	its	report	which	appears	in	Item	8	of	this Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K.

# Financial	Statements	and	Supplementary	Data

# Report	of	Independent	Registered	Public	Accounting	Firm

To	The	Stockholders	and	Board	of	Directors	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.:

In	our	opinion,	the	consolidated	financial	statements	listed	in	the	index	appearing	under	Item	15(a)(1)	present	fairly,	in	all	material	respects,	the	financial	position	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	its	subsidiaries	at	December	31,	2009 and	2008,	and	the	results	of	their	operations	and	their	cash	flows	for	each	of	the	three	years	in	the	period	ended	December	31,	2009	in	conformity	with	accounting	principles	generally	accepted	in	the	United	States	of	America.	In	addition,	in our	opinion,	the	financial	statement	schedule	listed	in	the	accompanying	index	appearing	under	Item	15(a)(2)	presents	fairly,	in	all	material	respects,	the	information	set	forth	therein	when	read	in	conjunction	with	the	related	consolidated financial	statements.	Also	in	our	opinion,	the	Company	maintained,	in	all	material	respects,	effective	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	as	of	December	31,	2009,	based	on	criteria	established	in	Internal	Control	—	Integrated Framework	issued	by	the	Committee	of	Sponsoring	Organizations	of	the	Treadway	Commission	(COSO).	The	Company's	management	is	responsible	for	these	financial	statements,	for	maintaining	effective	internal	control	over	financial reporting	and	for	its	assessment	of	the	effectiveness	of	internal	control	over	financial	reporting,	included	in	the	accompanying	Report	of	Management	on	Internal	Control	over	Financial	Reporting.	Our	responsibility	is	to	express	opinions	on these	financial	statements	and	on	the	Company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	based	on	our	integrated	audits.	We	conducted	our	audits	in	accordance	with	the	standards	of	the	Public	Company	Accounting	Oversight	Board (United	States).	Those	standards	require	that	we	plan	and	perform	the	audits	to	obtain	reasonable	assurance	about	whether	the	financial	statements	are	free	of	material	misstatement	and	whether	effective	internal	control	over	financial reporting	was	maintained	in	all	material	respects.	Our	audits	of	the	financial	statements	included	examining,	on	a	test	basis,	evidence	supporting	the	amounts	and	disclosures	in	the	financial	statements,	assessing	the	accounting	principles used	and	significant	estimates	made	by	management,	and	evaluating	the	overall	financial	statement	presentation.	Our	audit	of	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	included	obtaining	an	understanding	of	internal	control	over	financial reporting,	assessing	the	risk	that	a	material	weakness	exists,	and	testing	and	evaluating	the	design	and	operating	effectiveness	of	internal	control	based	on	the	assessed	risk.	Our	audits	also	included	performing	such	other	procedures	as	we considered	necessary	in	the	circumstances.	We	believe	that	our	audits	provide	a	reasonable	basis	for	our	opinions.

As	discussed	in	Note	2	to	the	consolidated	financial	statements,	the	Company	changed	the	manner	in	which	it	accounts	for	uncertain	tax	positions	in	2007.

A	company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	is	a	process	designed	to	provide	reasonable	assurance	regarding	the	reliability	of	financial	reporting	and	the	preparation	of	financial	statements	for	external	purposes	in accordance	with	generally	accepted	accounting	principles.	A	company's	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	includes	those	policies	and	procedures	that	(i)	pertain	to	the	maintenance	of	records	that,	in	reasonable	detail,	accurately	and fairly	reflect	the	transactions	and	dispositions	of	the	assets	of	the	company;	(ii)	provide	reasonable	assurance	that	transactions	are	recorded	as	necessary	to	permit	preparation	of	financial	statements	in	accordance	with	generally	accepted accounting	principles,	and	that	receipts	and	expenditures	of	the	company	are	being	made	only	in	accordance	with	authorizations	of	management	and	directors	of	the	company;	and	(iii)	provide	reasonable	assurance	regarding	prevention	or timely	detection	of	unauthorized	acquisition,	use,	or	disposition	of	the	company's	assets	that	could	have	a	material	effect	on	the	financial	statements.

Because	of	its	inherent	limitations,	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	may	not	prevent	or	detect	misstatements.	Also,	projections	of	any	evaluation	of	effectiveness	to	future	periods	are	subject	to	the	risk	that	controls	may become	inadequate	because	of	changes	in	conditions,	or	that	the	degree	of	compliance	with	the	policies	or	procedures	may	deteriorate.

# PricewaterhouseCoopers	LLP

# Chicago,	Illinois

# Consolidated	Statements	of	Earnings

| For	the	Years	Ended	December	31, | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Net\tSales | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | $3,897.5 |
| Cost\tof\tproducts\tsold | 990.8 | 997.3 | 875.9 |
| Gross\tProfit | \t3,104.6 | \t3,123.8 | \t3,021.6 |
| Research\tand\tdevelopment | 205.4 | 192.3 | 182.6 |
| Selling,\tgeneral\tand\tadministrative | \t1,729.2 | \t1,704.0 | \t1,516.7 |
| Settlement\t(Note\t17) | – | – | 169.5 |
| Certain\tclaims\t(Note\t17) | 35.0 | 69.0 | – |
| Goodwill\timpairment\t(Note\t8) | 73.0 | – | – |
| Acquisition,\tintegration,\trealignment\tand\tother\t(Note\t2) | 75.3 | 68.5 | 25.2 |
| Net\tcurtailment\tand\tsettlement\t(Note\t12) | (32.1) | – | – |
| Operating\texpenses | \t2,085.8 | \t2,033.8 | \t1,894.0 |
| Operating\tProfit | \t1,018.8 | \t1,090.0 | \t1,127.6 |
| Interest\tand\tother\tincome\t(expense),\tnet | (20.6) | 31.8 | 4.0 |
| Earnings\tbefore\tincome\ttaxes | 998.2 | \t1,121.8 | \t1,131.6 |
| Provision\tfor\tincome\ttaxes | 280.8 | 272.3 | 357.9 |
| Net\tearnings | 717.4 | 849.5 | 773.7 |
| Less:\tNet\tearnings\tattributable\tto\tnoncontrolling\tinterest | – | (0.9) | (0.5) |
| Net\tEarnings\tof\tZimmer\tHoldings,\tInc. | $717.4 | $848.6 | $773.2 |
| Earnings\tPer\tCommon\tShare\t–\tBasic | $3.34 | $3.73 | $3.28 |
| Earnings\tPer\tCommon\tShare\t–\tDiluted | $3.32 | $3.72 | $3.26 |
| Weighted\tAverage\tCommon\tShares\tOutstanding |  |  |  |
| Basic | 215.0 | 227.3 | 235.5 |
| Diluted | 215.8 | 228.3 | 237.5 |

The	accompanying	notes	are	an	integral	part	of	these	consolidated	financial	statements.

| December	31, | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| ASSETS |  |  |
| Current\tAssets: |  |  |
| Cash\tand\tcash\tequivalents | $691.7 | $212.6 |
| Restricted\tcash | 0.1 | 2.7 |
| Certificates\tof\tdeposit | 66.4 | – |
| Accounts\treceivable,\tless\tallowance\tfor\tdoubtful\taccounts | 751.4 | 732.8 |
| Inventories,\tnet | 913.2 | 928.3 |
| Prepaid\texpenses\tand\tother\tcurrent\tassets | 105.3 | 103.9 |
| Deferred\tincome\ttaxes | 209.9 | 198.3 |
| Total\tCurrent\tAssets | 2,738.0 | 2,178.6 |
| Property,\tplant\tand\tequipment,\tnet | 1,221.7 | 1,264.1 |
| Goodwill | 2,783.5 | 2,774.8 |
| Intangible\tassets,\tnet | 858.0 | 872.1 |
| Other\tassets | 184.3 | 149.4 |
| Total\tAssets | \t$7,785.5 | $7,239.0 |
| LIABILITIES\tAND\tSTOCKHOLDERS'\tEQUITY |  |  |
| Current\tLiabilities: |  |  |
| Accounts\tpayable | $134.6 | $186.4 |
| Income\ttaxes | 57.5 | 26.6 |
| Other\tcurrent\tliabilities | 498.6 | 558.1 |
| Total\tCurrent\tLiabilities | 690.7 | 771.1 |
| Other\tlong-term\tliabilities | 328.5 | 353.9 |
| Long-term\tdebt | 1,127.6 | 460.1 |
| Total\tLiabilities | 2,146.8 | 1,585.1 |
| Commitments\tand\tContingencies\t(Note\t17) |  |  |
| Stockholders'\tEquity: |  |  |
| Zimmer\tHoldings,\tInc.\tStockholders'\tEquity: |  |  |
| Common\tstock,\t$0.01\tpar\tvalue,\tone\tbillion\tshares\tauthorized, |  |  |
| 254.1\tmillion\t(253.7\tmillion\tin\t2008)\tissued | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| Paid-in\tcapital | 3,214.6 | 3,138.5 |
| Retained\tearnings | 5,102.5 | 4,385.5 |
| Accumulated\tother\tcomprehensive\tincome | 358.6 | 240.0 |
| Treasury\tstock,\t49.9\tmillion\tshares\t(30.1\tmillion\tshares\tin\t2008) | \t(3,039.5) | \t(2,116.2) |
| Total\tZimmer\tHoldings,\tInc.\tstockholders'\tequity | 5,638.7 | 5,650.3 |
| Noncontrolling\tinterest | – | 3.6 |
| Total\tStockholders'\tEquity | 5,638.7 | 5,653.9 |
| Total\tLiabilities\tand\tStockholders'\tEquity | \t$7,785.5 | $7,239.0 |

# Consolidated	Statements	of	Stockholders'	Equity

(in	millions)

|  |  |  | Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Stockholders | Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Stockholders |  |  |  |  |  |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  |  |  |  |  | Accumulated |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  | Other |  |  |  | Total |
|  | Common\tShares | Common\tShares | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury\tShares | Treasury\tShares | Noncontrolling | Stockholders' |
|  | Number | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income | Number | Amount | Interest | Equity |
| Balance\tJanuary\t1,\t2007 | 248.9 | $2.5 | $2,743.2 | $2,768.5 | $209.2 | (12.1) | $(802.9) | $2.7 | $4,923.2 |
| Net\tearnings | – | – | – | 773.2 | – | – | – | 0.5 | 773.7 |
| Other\tcomprehensive\tincome | – | – | – | – | 81.1 | – | – | – | 81.1 |
| Adoption\tof\tFASB's\tuncertain\ttax\tposition\tguidance | – | – | – | (4.8) | – | – | – | – | (4.8) |
| Stock\tcompensation\tplans,\tincluding\ttax\tbenefits | 3.3 | – | 255.9 | – | – | – | – | – | 255.9 |
| Share\trepurchases |  |  |  |  |  | (7.2) | (576.3) |  | (576.3) |
| Currency\ttranslation | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (0.4) | (0.4) |
| Balance\tDecember\t31,\t2007 | 252.2 | 2.5 | 2,999.1 | 3,536.9 | 290.3 | (19.3) | (1,379.2) | 2.8 | 5,452.4 |
| Net\tearnings | – | – | – | 848.6 | – | – | – | 0.9 | 849.5 |
| Other\tcomprehensive\tloss | – | – | – | – | (50.3) | – | – | – | (50.3) |
| Stock\tcompensation\tplans,\tincluding\ttax\tbenefits | 1.5 | – | 139.4 | – | – | – | – | – | 139.4 |
| Share\trepurchases | – | – | – | – | – | (10.8) | (737.0) | – | (737.0) |
| Currency\ttranslation | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | (0.1) | (0.1) |
| Balance\tDecember\t31,\t2008 | 253.7 | 2.5 | 3,138.5 | 4,385.5 | 240.0 | (30.1) | (2,116.2) | 3.6 | 5,653.9 |
| Net\tearnings | – | – | – | 717.4 | – | – | – | – | 717.4 |
| Other\tcomprehensive\tincome | – | – | – | – | 118.6 | – | – | – | 118.6 |
| Purchase\tof\tnoncontrolling\tinterest | – | – | (5.0) | – | – | – | – | (3.6) | (8.6) |
| Stock\tcompensation\tplans,\tincluding\ttax\tbenefits | 0.4 | – | 81.1 | (0.4) | – | – | 0.4 | – | 81.1 |
| Share\trepurchases | – | – | – | – | – | (19.8) | (923.7) | – | (923.7) |
| Balance\tDecember\t31,\t2009 | 254.1 | $2.5 | $3,214.6 | $5,102.5 | $358.6 | (49.9) | $(3,039.5) | $– | $5,638.7 |

# Consolidated	Statements	of	Cash	Flows

| For	the	Years	Ended	December	31, | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cash\tflows\tprovided\tby\t(used\tin)\toperating\tactivities: |  |  |  |
| Net\tearnings\tof\tZimmer\tHoldings,\tInc. | $717.4 | $848.6 | $773.2 |
| Adjustments\tto\treconcile\tnet\tearnings\tto\tnet\tcash\tprovided |  |  |  |
| by\toperating\tactivities: |  |  |  |
| Depreciation\tand\tamortization | 337.4 | 275.1 | 230.0 |
| Goodwill\timpairment | 73.0 | – | – |
| Gain\ton\tsale\tof\tinvestments | – | (38.8) | – |
| In-process\tresearch\tand\tdevelopment | – | 38.5 | 6.5 |
| Net\tcurtailment\tand\tsettlement | (32.1) | – | – |
| Share-based\tcompensation | 75.3 | 69.9 | 70.1 |
| Inventory\tstep-up | 12.5 | 7.0 | 0.5 |
| Deferred\tincome\ttax\tprovision | (19.7) | 2.0 | 63.9 |
| Income\ttax\tbenefit\tfrom\tstock\toption\texercises | 3.5 | 12.5 | 40.8 |
| Excess\tincome\ttax\tbenefit\tfrom\tstock\toption\texercises | (0.4) | (6.5) | (27.0) |
| Changes\tin\toperating\tassets\tand\tliabilities,\tnet\tof\tacquired\tassets\tand\tliabilities |  |  |  |
| Income\ttaxes\tpayable | 7.0 | (77.3) | 6.1 |
| Receivables | (4.6) | (44.4) | (12.5) |
| Inventories | 36.2 | (148.1) | (58.0) |
| Accounts\tpayable\tand\taccrued\tliabilities | (132.6) | 119.3 | 61.9 |
| Other\tassets\tand\tliabilities | 44.6 | (19.7) | (71.1) |
| Net\tcash\tprovided\tby\toperating\tactivities | 1,117.5 | 1,038.1 | 1,084.4 |
| Cash\tflows\tprovided\tby\t(used\tin)\tinvesting\tactivities: |  |  |  |
| Additions\tto\tinstruments | (123.7) | (237.9) | (138.5) |
| Additions\tto\tother\tproperty,\tplant\tand\tequipment | (105.1) | (250.0) | (192.7) |
| Acquisition\tof\tintellectual\tproperty\trights | (35.8) | (109.4) | – |
| Purchases\tof\tcertificates\tof\tdeposit | (66.4) | – | – |
| Proceeds\tfrom\tsale\tof\tinvestments | – | 54.9 | – |
| Abbott\tSpine\tacquisition,\tnet\tof\tacquired\tcash | – | (363.0) | – |
| Investments\tin\tother\tassets | (50.2) | (18.8) | (160.3) |
| Net\tcash\tused\tin\tinvesting\tactivities | (381.2) | (924.2) | (491.5) |
| Cash\tflows\tprovided\tby\t(used\tin)\tfinancing\tactivities: |  |  |  |
| Net\tproceeds\t(payments)\tunder\trevolving\tcredit\tfacility | (330.0) | 330.0 | – |
| Debt\tissuance\tcosts | (8.5) | – | – |
| Proceeds\tfrom\temployee\tstock\tcompensation\tplans | 9.5 | 57.0 | 149.8 |
| Excess\tincome\ttax\tbenefit\tfrom\tstock\toption\texercises | 0.4 | 6.5 | 27.0 |
| Repurchase\tof\tcommon\tstock | (923.7) | (737.0) | (576.3) |
| Proceeds\tfrom\tissuance\tof\tnotes | 998.8 | – | – |
| Acquisition\tof\tnoncontrolling\tinterest | (8.6) | – | – |
| Net\tcash\tused\tin\tfinancing\tactivities | (262.1) | (343.5) | (399.5) |
| Effect\tof\texchange\trates\ton\tcash\tand\tcash\tequivalents | 4.9 | (21.7) | 4.8 |
| Increase\t(decrease)\tin\tcash\tand\tcash\tequivalents | 479.1 | (251.3) | 198.2 |
| Cash\tand\tcash\tequivalents,\tbeginning\tof\tyear | 212.6 | 463.9 | 265.7 |
| Cash\tand\tcash\tequivalents,\tend\tof\tyear | $691.7 | $212.6 | $463.9 |

| For	the	Years	Ended	December	31, | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Net\tEarnings | $717.4 | $849.5 | $773.7 |
| Other\tComprehensive\tIncome\t(Loss): |  |  |  |
| Foreign\tcurrency\tcumulative\ttranslation\tadjustments | 114.0 | (49.4) | 101.1 |
| Unrealized\tforeign\tcurrency\thedge\tgains/(losses),\tnet\tof\ttax\teffects\tof |  |  |  |
| $8.9\tin\t2009,\t$0.7\tin\t2008\tand\t$11.5\tin\t2007 | (28.9) | 35.0 | (49.8) |
| Reclassification\tadjustments\ton\tforeign\tcurrency\thedges,\tnet\tof\ttax\teffects\tof |  |  |  |
| $(0.1)\tin\t2009,\t$(9.2)\tin\t2008\tand\t$(1.3)\tin\t2007 | (18.1) | 43.4 | 27.0 |
| $(15.2)\tin\t2008\tand\t$0.9\tin\t2007 | (0.3) | 24.4 | (1.4) |
|  | – | (23.8) | – |
| Prior\tservice\tcost\tand\tunrecognized\tgain/(loss)\tin\tactuarial\tassumptions, |  |  |  |
|  | 51.9 | (79.9) | 4.2 |
| Total\tOther\tComprehensive\tIncome\t(Loss) | 118.6 | (50.3) | 81.1 |
| Comprehensive\t(Loss)\tAttributable\tto\tNoncontrolling\tInterest | – | (0.9) | (0.5) |
| Comprehensive\tIncome\tAttributable\tto\tZimmer\tHoldings,\tInc. | $836.0 | $798.3 | $854.3 |

# Notes	to	Consolidated	Financial	Statements

# 1. BUSINESS

We	design,	develop,	manufacture	and	market	orthopaedic	reconstructive	implants,	dental	implants,	spinal	implants,	trauma	products	and	related	surgical	products.	We	also	provide	other	healthcare	related	services.	Orthopaedic reconstructive	implants	restore	function	lost	due	to	disease	or	trauma	in	joints	such	as	knees,	hips,	shoulders	and	elbows.	Dental	reconstructive	implants	restore	function	and	aesthetics	in	patients	who	have	lost	teeth	due	to	trauma	or	disease. Spinal	implants	are	utilized	by	orthopaedic	surgeons	and	neurosurgeons	in	the	treatment	of	degenerative	diseases,	deformities	and	trauma	in	all	regions	of	the	spine.	Trauma	products	are	devices	used	primarily	to	reattach	or	stabilize damaged	bone	and	tissue	to	support	the	body's	natural	healing	process.	Our	related	surgical	products	include	surgical	supplies	and	instruments	designed	to	aid	in	orthopaedic	surgical	procedures	and	post-operation	rehabilitation.	We	have operations	in	more	than	25	countries	and	market	our	products	in	more	than	100	countries.	We	operate	in	a	single	industry	but	have	three	reportable	geographic	segments,	the	Americas,	Europe	and	Asia	Pacific.

The	words	"we",	"us",	"our"	and	similar	words	refer	to	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	its	subsidiaries.	Zimmer	Holdings	refers	to	the	parent	company	only.

# 2. SIGNIFICANT	ACCOUNTING	POLICIES

Basis	of	Presentation	–	The	consolidated	financial	statements	include	the	accounts	of	Zimmer	Holdings	and	its	subsidiaries	in	which	it	holds	a	controlling	equity	position.	Investments	in	companies	in	which	we	exercise	significant influence	over	the	operating	and	financial	affairs,	but	do	not	control,	are	accounted	for	under	the	equity	method.	Under	the	equity	method,	we	record	the	investment	at	cost	and	adjust	the	carrying	amount	of	the	investment	by	our proportionate	share	of	the	investee's	net	earnings	or	losses.	All	significant	intercompany	accounts	and	transactions	are	eliminated.	Certain	amounts	in	the	2008	and	2007	consolidated	financial	statements	have	been	reclassified	to	conform	to the	2009	presentation.

Use	of	Estimates	–	The	consolidated	financial	statements	are	prepared	in	conformity	with	accounting	principles	generally	accepted	in	the	United	States	which	require	us	to	make	estimates	and	assumptions	that	affect	the	reported amounts	of	assets	and	liabilities	and	disclosure	of	contingent	assets	and	liabilities	at	the	date	of	the	financial	statements	and	the	reported	amounts	of	revenues	and	expenses	during	the	reporting	period.	Actual	results	could	differ	from	those estimates.

Foreign	Currency	Translation	–	The	financial	statements	of	our	foreign	subsidiaries	are	translated	into	U.S.	dollars	using	period-end	exchange	rates	for	assets	and	liabilities	and	average	exchange	rates	for	operating	results. Unrealized	translation	gains	and	losses	are	included	in	accumulated	other	comprehensive	income	in	stockholders'	equity.	When	a	transaction	is	denominated	in	a	currency	other	than	the	subsidiary's	functional	currency,	we	recognize	a transaction	gain	or	loss	when	the	transaction	is	settled.	Foreign	currency	transaction	gains	and	losses	included	in	net	earnings	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	were	not	significant.

Revenue	Recognition	–	We	sell	product	through	three	principal	channels:	1)	direct	to	healthcare	institutions,	referred	to	as	direct	channel	accounts;	2)	through	stocking	distributors	and	healthcare	dealers;	and	3)	directly	to	dental practices	and	dental	laboratories.	The	direct	channel	accounts	represent	approximately	80	percent	of	our	net	sales.	Through	this	channel,	inventory	is	generally	consigned	to	sales	agents	or	customers	so	that	products	are	available	when needed	for	surgical	procedures.	No	revenue	is	recognized	upon	the	placement	of	inventory	into	consignment	as	we	retain	title	and	maintain	the	inventory	on	our	balance	sheet.	Upon	implantation,	we	issue	an	invoice	and	revenue	is recognized.	Pricing	for	products	is	generally	predetermined	by	contracts	with	customers,	agents	acting	on	behalf	of	customer	groups	or	by	government	regulatory	bodies,	depending	on	the	market.	Price	discounts	under	group	purchasing contracts	are	generally	linked	to	volume	of	implant	purchases	by	customer	healthcare	institutions	within	a	specified	group.	At	negotiated	thresholds	within	a	contract	buying	period,	price	discounts	may	increase.	Sales	to	stocking	distributors, healthcare	dealers,	dental	practices	and	dental	laboratories	account	for	approximately	20	percent	of	our	net	sales.	With	these	types	of	sales,	revenue	is	recognized	when	title	to	product	passes,	either	upon	shipment	of	the	product	or	in	some cases	upon	implantation	of	the	product.	Product	is	generally	sold	at	contractually	fixed	prices	for	specified	periods.	Payment	terms	vary	by	customer,	but	are	typically	less	than	90	days.	In	some	cases	sales	incentives	may	be	earned	by	a customer	for	purchasing	a	specified	amount	of	our	product.	We	estimate	whether	such	incentives	will	be	achieved	and,	if	so,	recognize	these	incentives	as	a	reduction	in	revenue	in	the	same	period	the	underlying	revenue	transaction	is recognized.	Occasionally	products	are	returned,	and,	accordingly,	we	maintain	an	estimated	sales	return	reserve	that	is	recorded	as	a	reduction	in	revenue.	Product	returns	were	not	significant	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and 2007.

The	reserves	for	doubtful	accounts	were	$18.8	million	and	$20.0	million	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.

Shipping	and	Handling	–	Amounts	billed	to	customers	for	shipping	and	handling	of	products	are	reflected	in	net	sales	and	are	not	significant.	Expenses	incurred	related	to	shipping	and	handling	of	products	are	reflected	in	selling, general	and	administrative	and	were	$121.8	million,	$117.3	million	and	$104.1	million	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007,	respectively.

Acquisition,	Integration,	Realignment	and	Other	–	We	recognize	expenses	resulting	directly	from	our	business	combinations	and	other	items	as	"Acquisition,	integration,

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Adjustment\tor\timpairment\tof\tacquired\tassets\tand\tobligations,\tnet | $(1.5) | $(10.4) | $(1.2) |
| Consulting\tand\tprofessional\tfees | 11.7 | 13.2 | 1.0 |
| Employee\tseverance\tand\tretention,\tincluding\tshare-based\tcompensation\tacceleration | 19.0 | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Information\ttechnology\tintegration | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.6 |
| In-process\tresearch\t&amp;\tdevelopment | – | 38.5 | 6.5 |
| Vacated\tfacilities | 1.4 | – | – |
| Facility\tand\temployee\trelocation | 5.4 | 7.5 | – |
| Distributor\tacquisitions | 1.1 | 6.9 | 4.1 |
| Certain\tlitigation\tmatters | 23.4 | – | – |
| Contract\tterminations | 9.4 | 5.7 | 5.4 |
| Other | 4.3 | 6.2 | 5.2 |
| Acquisition,\tintegration,\trealignment\tand\tother | $75.3 | $68.5 | $25.2 |

Adjustment	or	impairment	of	acquired	assets	and	obligations	relates	to	impairment	on	assets	that	were	acquired	in	business	combinations	or	adjustments	to	certain	liabilities	of	acquired	companies	due	to	changes	in	circumstances surrounding	those	liabilities	subsequent	to	the	related	measurement	period.

Consulting	and	professional	fees	relate	to	third-party	integration	consulting	performed	in	a	variety	of	areas	such	as	tax,	compliance,	logistics	and	human	resources	and	include	third-party	fees	related	to	severance	and	termination benefits	matters.	These	fees	also	include	legal	fees	related	to	litigation	matters	involving	acquired	businesses	that	existed	prior	to	our	acquisition	or	resulted	from	our	acquisition.

During	2009,	we	commenced	a	global	realignment	initiative	to	focus	on	business	opportunities	that	best	support	our	strategic	priorities.	As	part	of	this	realignment,	we	initiated	changes	in	our	work	force,	eliminating	positions	in	some areas	and	increasing	others.	Approximately	300	employees	from	across	the	globe	were	affected	by	these	actions.	As	a	result	of	these	changes	in	our	work	force	and	headcount	reductions	from	acquisitions,	we	recorded	expense	of $19.0	million	related	to	severance	and	other	employee	termination-related	costs.	These	termination	benefits	were	provided	in	accordance	with	our	existing	or	local	government	policies	and	are	considered	ongoing	benefits.	These	costs	were accrued	when	they	became	probable	and	estimable	and	were	recorded	as	part	of	other	current	liabilities.	The	majority	of	these	costs	were	paid	during	2009.

Information	technology	integration	relates	to	the	non-capitalizable	costs	associated	with	integrating	the	information	systems	of	acquired	businesses.

In-process	research	and	development	charges	for	2008	relate	to	the	acquisition	of	Abbott	Spine.	In-process	research	and	development	charges	for	2007	relate	to	the	acquisitions	of	Endius	and	ORTHOsoft.

In	2009,	we	ceased	using	certain	leased	facilities	and,	accordingly,	recorded	expense	for	the	remaining	lease	payments,	less	estimated	sublease	recoveries,	and	wrote-off	any	assets	being	used	in	those	facilities.

Facility	and	employee	relocation	relates	to	costs	associated	with	relocating	certain	facilities.	Most	notably,	we	consolidated	our	legacy	European	distribution	centers	into	a	new	distribution	center	in	Eschbach,	Germany.

Over	the	past	three	years	we	have	acquired	a	number	of	U.S.	and	foreign-based	distributors.	We	have	incurred	various	costs	related	to	the	acquisition	and	integration	of	those	businesses.

Certain	litigation	matters	relate	to	costs	recognized	during	the	year	for	the	estimated	or	actual	settlement	of	various	legal	matters,	including	patent	litigation	matters,	commercial	litigation	matters	and	matters	arising	from	our acquisitions	of	certain	competitive	distributorships	in	prior	years.	We	recognize	expense	for	the	potential	settlement	of	a	legal	matter	when	we	believe	it	is	probable	that	a	loss	has	been	incurred	and	we	can	reasonably	estimate	the	loss.	In 2009,	we	made	a	concerted	effort	to	settle	many	of	these	matters	to	avoid	further	litigation	costs.

Contract	termination	costs	relate	to	terminated	agreements	in	connection	with	the	integration	of	acquired	companies.	The	terminated	contracts	primarily	relate	to	sales	agents	and	distribution	agreements.

Cash	and	Cash	Equivalents	–	We	consider	all	highly	liquid	investments	with	an	original	maturity	of	three	months	or	less	to	be	cash	equivalents.	The	carrying	amounts	reported	in	the	balance	sheet	for	cash	and	cash	equivalents	are valued	at	cost,	which	approximates	their	fair	value.

Certificates	of	Deposit	–	We	invest	in	cash	deposits	with	original	maturities	greater	than	three	months	and	classify	these	investments	as	certificates	of	deposit	on	our	consolidated	balance	sheet.	The	carrying	amounts	reported	in	the balance	sheet	for	certificates	of	deposit	are	valued	at	cost,	which	approximates	their	fair	value.

Inventories	–	Inventories,	net	of	allowances	for	obsolete	and	slow-moving	goods,	are	stated	at	the	lower	of	cost	or	market,	with	cost	determined	on	a	first-in	first-out	basis.

Property,	Plant	and	Equipment	–	Property,	plant	and	equipment	is	carried	at	cost	less	accumulated	depreciation.	Depreciation	is	computed	using	the	straight-line	method	based	on	estimated	useful	lives	of	ten	to	forty	years	for buildings	and	improvements	and	three	to	eight	years	for	machinery	and	equipment.	Maintenance	and	repairs	are	expensed	as	incurred.	We	review	property,	plant	and	equipment	for	impairment	whenever	events	or	changes	in	circumstances indicate	that	the	carrying	value	of	an	asset	may	not	be	recoverable.	An	impairment	loss	would	be	recognized	when	estimated	future	undiscounted	cash	flows	relating	to	the	asset	are	less	than	its	carrying	amount.	An	impairment	loss	is measured	as	the	amount	by	which	the	carrying	amount	of	an	asset	exceeds	its	fair	value.

# Notes	to	Consolidated	Financial	Statements	(Continued)

Software	Costs	–	We	capitalize	certain	computer	software	and	software	development	costs	incurred	in	connection	with	developing	or	obtaining	computer	software	for	internal	use	when	both	the	preliminary	project	stage	is	completed and	it	is	probable	that	the	software	will	be	used	as	intended.	Capitalized	software	costs	generally	include	external	direct	costs	of	materials	and	services	utilized	in	developing	or	obtaining	computer	software	and	compensation	and	related benefits	for	employees	who	are	directly	associated	with	the	software	project.	Capitalized	software	costs	are	included	in	property,	plant	and	equipment	on	our	balance	sheet	and	amortized	on	a	straight-line	basis	when	the	software	is	ready	for its	intended	use	over	the	estimated	useful	lives	of	the	software,	which	approximate	three	to	ten	years.

Instruments	–	Instruments	are	hand-held	devices	used	by	surgeons	during	total	joint	replacement	and	other	surgical	procedures.	Instruments	are	recognized	as	long-lived	assets	and	are	included	in	property,	plant	and	equipment. Undeployed	instruments	are	carried	at	cost,	net	of	allowances	for	excess	and	obsolete	instruments.	Instruments	in	the	field	are	carried	at	cost	less	accumulated	depreciation.	Depreciation	is	computed	using	the	straight-line	method	based	on average	estimated	useful	lives,	determined	principally	in	reference	to	associated	product	life	cycles,	primarily	five	years.	We	review	instruments	for	impairment	whenever	events	or	changes	in	circumstances	indicate	that	the	carrying	value of	an	instrument	may	not	be	recoverable.	Depreciation	of	instruments	is	recognized	as	selling,	general	and	administrative	expense.

Goodwill	–	Goodwill	is	not	amortized	but	is	subject	to	annual	impairment	tests.	Goodwill	has	been	assigned	to	reporting	units.	We	perform	annual	impairment	tests	by	comparing	each	reporting	unit's	fair	value	to	its	carrying	amount to	determine	if	there	is	potential	impairment.	The	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit	and	the	implied	fair	value	of	goodwill	are	determined	based	upon	a	discounted	cash	flow	analysis.	Significant	assumptions	are	incorporated	into	these discounted	cash	flow	analyses	such	as	estimated	growth	rates	and	risk-adjusted	discount	rates.	We	perform	this	test	in	the	fourth	quarter	of	the	year	or	whenever	events	or	changes	in	circumstances	indicate	that	the	carrying	value	of	the reporting	unit's	assets	may	not	be	recoverable.	If	the	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit	is	less	than	its	carrying	value,	an	impairment	loss	is	recorded	to	the	extent	that	the	implied	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit	goodwill	is	less	than	the	carrying value	of	the	reporting	unit	goodwill.	During	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	we	recorded	a	goodwill	impairment	charge	of	$73.0	million	related	to	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit.	See	Note	8	for	more	information	regarding	goodwill	and goodwill	impairment.

Intangible	Assets	–	Intangible	assets	are	initially	measured	at	their	fair	value.	We	have	determined	the	fair	value	of	our	intangible	assets	either	by	the	fair	value	of	the	consideration	exchanged	for	the	intangible	asset	or	the	estimated after-tax	discounted	cash	flows	expected	to	be	generated	from	the	intangible	asset.	Intangible	assets	with	an	indefinite	life,	including	certain	trademarks	and	trade	names,	are	not	amortized.	Indefinite	life	intangible	assets	are	assessed annually	to	determine	whether	events	and	circumstances	continue	to	support	an	indefinite	life.	Intangible	assets	with	a	finite	life,	including	core	and	developed	technology,	certain	trademarks	and	trade	names,	customer-related	intangibles, intellectual	property	rights	and	patents	and	licenses	are	amortized	on	a	straight-line	basis	over	their	estimated	useful	life,	ranging	from	less	than	one	year	to	40	years.	Intangible	assets	with	a	finite	life	are	tested	for	impairment	whenever events	or	circumstances	indicate	that	the	carrying	amount	may	not	be	recoverable.	Intangible	assets	with	an	indefinite	life	are	tested	for	impairment	annually	or	whenever	events	or	circumstances	indicate	that	the	carrying	amount	may	not	be recoverable.	An	impairment	loss	is	recognized	if	the	carrying	amount	exceeds	the	estimated	fair	value	of	the	asset.	The	amount	of	the	impairment	loss	to	be	recorded	would	be	determined	based	upon	the	excess	of	the	asset's	carrying	value over	its	fair	value.	The	fair	values	of	indefinite	lived	intangible	assets	are	determined	based	upon	a	discounted	cash	flow	analysis	using	the	relief	from	royalty	method.	The	relief	from	royalty	method	estimates	the	cost	savings	associated	with owning,	rather	than	licensing,	assets.	Significant	assumptions	are	incorporated	into	these	discounted	cash	flow	analyses	such	as	estimated	growth	rates,	royalty	rates	and	risk-adjusted	discount	rates.

In	determining	the	useful	lives	of	intangible	assets,	we	consider	the	expected	use	of	the	assets	and	the	effects	of	obsolescence,	demand,	competition,	anticipated	technological	advances,	changes	in	surgical	techniques,	market influences	and	other	economic	factors.	For	technology-based	intangible	assets,	we	consider	the	expected	life	cycles	of	products,	absent	unforeseen	technological	advances,	which	incorporate	the	corresponding	technology.	Trademarks	and trade	names	that	do	not	have	a	wasting	characteristic	(i.e.,	there	are	no	legal,	regulatory,	contractual,	competitive,	economic	or	other	factors	which	limit	the	useful	life)	are	assigned	an	indefinite	life.	Trademarks	and	trade	names	that	are related	to	products	expected	to	be	phased	out	are	assigned	lives	consistent	with	the	period	in	which	the	products	bearing	each	brand	are	expected	to	be	sold.	For	customer	relationship	intangible	assets,	we	assign	useful	lives	based	upon historical	levels	of	customer	attrition.	Intellectual	property	rights	are	assigned	useful	lives	that	approximate	the	contractual	life	of	any	related	patent	or	the	period	for	which	we	maintain	exclusivity	over	the	intellectual	property.

Research	and	Development	–	We	expense	all	research	and	development	costs	as	incurred.	Research	and	development	costs	include	salaries,	prototypes,	depreciation	of	equipment	used	in	research	and	development,	consultant	fees	and service	fees	paid	to	collaborative	partners.

Income	Taxes	–	We	account	for	income	taxes	under	the	asset	and	liability	method,	which	requires	the	recognition	of	deferred	tax	assets	and	liabilities	for	the	expected	future	tax

consequences	of	events	that	have	been	included	in	the	financial	statements.	Under	this	method,	deferred	tax	assets	and	liabilities	are	determined	based	on	the	differences	between	the	financial	statements	and	tax	basis	of	assets	and	liabilities using	enacted	tax	rates	in	effect	for	the	year	in	which	the	differences	are	expected	to	reverse.	The	effect	of	a	change	in	tax	rates	on	deferred	tax	assets	and	liabilities	is	recognized	in	income	in	the	period	that	includes	the	enactment	date.

We	record	net	deferred	tax	assets	to	the	extent	we	believe	these	assets	will	more	likely	than	not	be	realized.	In	making	such	determination,	we	consider	all	available	positive	and	negative	evidence,	including	future	reversals	of existing	taxable	temporary	differences,	projected	future	taxable	income,	tax	planning	strategies	and	recent	financial	operations.	In	the	event	we	were	to	determine	that	we	would	be	able	to	realize	our	deferred	income	tax	assets	in	the	future	in excess	of	their	net	recorded	amount,	we	would	make	an	adjustment	to	the	valuation	allowance	which	would	reduce	the	provision	for	income	taxes.	Federal	income	taxes	are	provided	on	the	portion	of	the	income	of	foreign	subsidiaries	that is	expected	to	be	remitted	to	the	U.S.

Derivative	Financial	Instruments	–	We	measure	all	derivative	instruments	at	fair	value	and	report	them	on	our	consolidated	balance	sheet	as	assets	or	liabilities.	We	maintain	written	policies	and	procedures	that	permit,	under appropriate	circumstances	and	subject	to	proper	authorization,	the	use	of	derivative	financial	instruments	solely	for	hedging	purposes.	The	use	of	derivative	financial	instruments	for	trading	or	speculative	purposes	is	prohibited	by	our	policy. See	Note	11	for	more	information	regarding	our	derivative	and	hedging	activities.

Other	Comprehensive	Income	–	Other	comprehensive	income	refers	to	revenues,	expenses,	gains	and	losses	that	under	generally	accepted	accounting	principles	are	included	in	comprehensive	income	but	are	excluded	from	net earnings	as	these	amounts	are	recorded	directly	as	an	adjustment	to	stockholders'	equity.	Other	comprehensive	income	is	comprised	of	foreign	currency	translation	adjustments,	unrealized	foreign	currency	hedge	gains	and	losses,	unrealized gains	and	losses	on	available-for-sale	securities	and	amortization	of	prior	service	costs	and	unrecognized	gains	and	losses	in	actuarial	assumptions.

The	components	of	accumulated	other	comprehensive	income	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | Balance	at<br>	 December	31,<br>2008 | Other<br>Comprehensive<br>Income	(Loss) | Balance	at<br>December	31,<br>2009 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Foreign\tcurrency\ttranslation | $319.4 | $114.0 | $433.4 |
| Foreign\tcurrency\thedges | 33.0 | (47.0) | (14.0) |
| Unrealized\tgain/(loss)\ton\tsecurities | (1.3) | (0.3) | (1.6) |
| Unrecognized\tprior\tservice\tcost\tand |  |  |  |
| unrecognized\tgain/(loss)\tin\tactuarial\tassumptions | (111.1) | 51.9 | (59.2) |
| Accumulated\tother\tcomprehensive\tincome | $240.0 | $118.6 | $358.6 |

During	2008,	we	reclassified	an	investment	previously	accounted	for	under	the	equity	method	to	an	available-for-sale	investment	as	we	no	longer	exercised	significant	influence	over	the	third-party	investee.	The	investment	was marked-to-market	in	accordance	with	the	FASB's	guidance	on	accounting	for	certain	investments	in	debt	and	equity	securities,	resulting	in	a	net	unrealized	gain	of	$23.8	million	recorded	in	other	comprehensive	income	for	2008.	This unrealized	gain	was	reclassified	to	the	income	statement	when	we	sold	this	investment	in	2008	for	total	proceeds	of	$54.9	million	and	a	gross	realized	gain	of	$38.8	million	included	in	interest	and	other	income.	The	basis	of	these	securities was	determined	based	on	the	consideration	paid	at	the	time	of	acquisition.

Treasury	Stock	–	We	account	for	repurchases	of	common	stock	under	the	cost	method	and	present	treasury	stock	as	a	reduction	of	shareholders	equity.	We	reissue	common	stock	held	in	treasury	only	for	limited	purposes.

Noncontrolling	Interest	–	On	January	1,	2009,	we	adopted	the	FASB's	newly	issued	guidance	related	to	noncontrolling	interests.	This	new	guidance	changes	the	accounting	and	reporting	for	minority	interests,	which	are	now recharacterized	as	noncontrolling	interests	and	classified	as	a	component	of	equity.	This	new	guidance	requires	retroactive	adoption	of	the	presentation	and	disclosure	requirements	for	existing	noncontrolling	interests.	This	adoption	did	not have	a	material	impact	on	our	consolidated	financial	statements	or	results	of	operations.	During	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	we	acquired	100	percent	ownership	of	our	only	outstanding	noncontrolling	interest	for	approximately $8.6	million.	This	purchase	was	recorded	as	an	equity	transaction	and	is	reflected	as	a	financing	activity	in	our	consolidated	statement	of	cash	flows.	As	a	result,	the	carrying	balance	of	the	noncontrolling	interests	of	$3.6	million	was eliminated,	and	the	remaining	$5.0	million,	representing	the	difference	between	the	purchase	price	and	carrying	balance,	was	recorded	as	a	reduction	in	paid-in	capital.	Transactions	with	noncontrolling	interests	had	the	following

effect	on	equity	attributable	to	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	(in	millions):

Accounting	Pronouncements	–	In	September	2006,	the	FASB	issued	guidance	related	to	fair	value	measurements,	which	defines	fair	value,	establishes	a	framework	for	measuring	fair	value	in	generally	accepted	accounting	principles and	expands	disclosures	about	fair	value	measurements.	This	guidance	did	not	require	any	new	fair	value	measurements,	but	provided	guidance	on	how	to	measure	fair	value	by	providing	a	fair	value	hierarchy	used	to	classify	the	source	of the	information.	In	February	2008,	the	FASB	delayed	the	effective	date	of	certain	provisions	of	this	fair	value	guidance	relating	to	non-financial	assets	and	liabilities	measured	at	fair	value	on	a	non-recurring	basis	until	fiscal	years	beginning after	November	15,	2008.	In	January	2009,	we	adopted	these	additional	provisions	of	the	FASB's	fair	value	guidance.	This	adoption	did	not	have	a	material	impact	on	our	consolidated	financial	statements	or	results	of	operations.	See	Note	7 for	more	information	on	fair	value	measurements	of	assets	and	liabilities.

On	January	1,	2009,	we	adopted	the	FASB's	newly	issued	guidance	related	to	business	combinations.	This	guidance	introduces	new	purchase	accounting	concepts,	expands	the	use	of	fair	value	accounting	related	to	business combinations	and	changes	the	subsequent	period	accounting	for	certain	acquired	assets	and	liabilities.	Additionally,	it	changes	the	accounting	for	deferred	tax	assets	and	income	tax	reserves	recorded	as	part	of	a	business	combination.	If	a remeasurement	of	these	assets	or	liabilities	is	warranted	after	January	1,	2009,	it	will	affect	income	tax	expense	as	opposed	to	the	previous	accounting	guidance	which	would	have	required	goodwill	to	be	adjusted.	We	have	applied	this guidance	to	business	combinations	with	acquisition	dates	occurring	in	2009.	This	adoption	did	not	have	a	material	impact	on	our	consolidated	financial	statements	or	results	of	operations.

On	January	1,	2009,	we	adopted	the	FASB's	newly	issued	guidance	related	to	disclosures	about	derivative	instruments	and	hedging	activities.	This	guidance	requires	increased	disclosure	of	our	derivative	and	hedging	activities, including	how	derivative	and	hedging	activities	affect	our	consolidated	statement	of	earnings,	balance	sheet	and	cash	flows,	but	does	not	impact	our	financial	position	or	results	of	operations.	See	Note	11	for	more	information	on	our derivative	instruments	and	hedging	activities.

In	May	2009,	the	FASB	issued	new	guidance	related	to	the	accounting	for	and	disclosure	of	subsequent	events,	which	is	effective	for	interim	and	annual	periods	ending	after	June	15,	2009.	This	new	guidance	establishes	general standards	of	accounting	for	and	disclosure	of	events	that	occur	after	the	balance	sheet	date	but	before	financial	statements	are	issued	or	are	available	to	be	issued.	This	guidance	introduces	new	terminology	but	is	based	on	the	same	principles that	previously	existed	in	the	auditing	standards.	Under	this	new	guidance	we	are	required	to	provide	disclosure	of	the	date	through	which	we	have	evaluated	subsequent	events	and	whether	that	date	represents	the	date	the	financial statements	were	issued	or	the	date	the	financial	statements	were	available	to	be	issued.	For	the	financial	statements	related	to	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	contained	herein,	we	have	evaluated	subsequent	events through	February	25,	2010	representing	the	date	these	financial	statements	were	issued.

In	July	2006,	the	FASB	issued	guidance	which	clarifies	the	accounting	for	uncertainty	in	income	taxes	recognized	in	the	financial	statements.	This	guidance	provides	that	a	tax	benefit	from	an	uncertain	tax	position	may	be	recognized when	it	is	more	likely	than	not	that	the	position	will	be	sustained	upon	examination,	including	resolutions	of	any	related	appeals	or	litigation	processes,	based	on	the	technical	merits.	Income	tax	positions	must	meet	a	more	likely	than	not recognition	threshold	at	the	effective	date	and	in	subsequent	periods	to	be	recognized.	The	FASB	also	provided	guidance	on	measurement,	derecognition,	classification,	interest	and	penalties,	accounting	in	interim	periods,	disclosure	and transition.	We	adopted	the	FASB	guidance	effective	January	1,	2007.

# 3. SHARE-BASED	COMPENSATION

Our	share-based	payments	primarily	consist	of	stock	options,	restricted	stock,	restricted	stock	units	(RSUs),	performance	shares	and	an	employee	stock	purchase	plan.	For	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	share-based	payment expense	was	$75.3	million	or	$54.4	million	net	of	the	related	tax	benefits.	For	the	year	ended	December	31,	2008,	share-based	payment	expense	was	$69.9	million	or	$49.5	million	net	of	the	related	tax	benefits.	For	the	year	ended December	31,	2007,	share-based	payment	expense	was	$70.1	million	or	$48.1	million	net	of	the	related	tax	benefits.

# Stock	Options

We	had	two	equity	compensation	plans	in	effect	at	December	31,	2009:	the	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(2009	Plan)	and	the	Stock	Plan	for	Non-Employee	Directors.	The	2009	Plan	succeeds	the	2006	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(the	"2006 Plan")	and	the	TeamShare	Stock	Option	Plan	(TeamShare	Plan).	Following	stockholder	approval	of	the	2009	Plan	in	May	2009,	no	further	awards	were	granted	under	the	2006	Plan	or	under	the	TeamShare	Plan,	and	shares	remaining available	for

grant	under	those	plans	are	expected	to	be	merged	into	the	2009	Plan.	Vested	and	unvested	stock	options	and	unvested	restricted	stock	and	RSUs	previously	granted	under	the	2006	Plan,	the	TeamShare	Plan	and	another	prior	plan,	the	2001 Stock	Incentive	Plan,	remained	outstanding	as	of	December	31,	2009.	We	have	reserved	the	maximum	number	of	shares	of	common	stock	available	for	award	under	the	terms	of	each	of	these	plans.	We	have	registered	52.9	million	shares	of common	stock	and	expect	to	register	an	additional	5	million	shares	under	the	Securities	Act	of	1933,	as	amended.	The	2009	Plan	provides	for	the	grant	of	nonqualified	stock	options	and	incentive	stock	options,	long-term	performance	awards in	the	form	of	performance	shares	or	units,	restricted	stock,	RSUs	and	stock	appreciation	rights.	The	Compensation	and	Management	Development	Committee	of	the	Board	of	Directors	determines	the	grant	date	for	annual	grants	under	our equity	compensation	plans.	The	date	for	annual	grants	under	the	2009	Plan	to	our	executive	officers	is	expected	to	occur	in	the	first	quarter	of	each	year	following	the	earnings	announcements	for	the	previous	quarter	and	full	year.	The	Stock Plan	for	Non-Employee	Directors	provides	for	awards	of	stock	options,	restricted	stock	and	RSUs	to	non-employee	directors.	It	has	been	our	practice	to	issue	shares	of	common	stock	upon	exercise	of	stock	options	from	previously	unissued shares.	The	total	number	of	awards	which	may	be	granted	in	a	given	year	and/or	over	the	life	of	the	plan	under	each	of	our	equity	compensation	plans	is	limited.	At	December	31,	2009,	an	aggregate	of	14.2	million	shares	were	available	for future	grants	and	awards	under	these	plans.

Stock	options	granted	to	date	under	our	plans	generally	vest	over	four	years	and	generally	have	a	maximum	contractual	life	of	10	years.	As	established	under	our	equity	compensation	plans,	vesting	may	accelerate	upon	retirement	after the	first	anniversary	date	of	the	award	if	certain	criteria	are	met.	We	recognize	expense	related	to	stock	options	on	a	straight-line	basis	over	the	requisite	service	period,	less	awards	expected	to	be	forfeited	using	estimated	forfeiture	rates. Due	to	the	accelerated	retirement	provisions,	the	requisite	service	period	of	our	stock	options	range	from	one	to	four	years.	Stock	options	are	granted	with	an	exercise	price	equal	to	the	market	price	of	our	common	stock	on	the	date	of	grant, except	in	limited	circumstances	where	local	law	may	dictate	otherwise.	In	the	past,	certain	options	have	had	price	thresholds,	which	affect	exercisability.	All	such	price	thresholds	have	been	satisfied.	The	total	number	of	awards	which	may be	granted	in	a	given	year	and/or	over	the	life	of	the	plan	under	each	of	our	stock	option	plans	is	limited	to	control	dilution.

A	summary	of	stock	option	activity	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009	is	as	follows	(options	in	thousands):

We	use	a	Black-Scholes	option-pricing	model	to	determine	the	fair	value	of	our	stock	options.	Expected	volatility	was	derived	from	the	implied	volatility	of	our	traded	options	that	were	actively	traded	around	the	grant	date	of	the stock	options	with	exercise	prices	similar	to	the	stock	options	and	maturities	of	over	one	year.	The	expected	term	of	the	stock	options	has	been	derived	from	historical	employee	exercise	behavior.	The	risk-free	interest	rate	is	determined using	the	implied	yield	currently	available	for	zero-coupon	U.S.	government	issues	with	a	remaining	term	equal	to	the	expected	life	of	the	options.	A	dividend	yield	of	zero	percent	has	been	used	as	we	have	not	paid	a	dividend	since becoming	a	public	company	in	2001	and	we	do	not	expect	to	pay	a	dividend	in	the	foreseeable	future.

The	weighted	average	fair	value	of	the	options	granted	in	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	were	determined	using	the	following	assumptions:

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Dividend\tYield | –% | –% | –% |
| Volatility | 41.6% | 27.4% | 23.8% |
| Risk-free\tinterest\trate | 1.7% | 2.9% | 4.4% |
| Expected\tlife\t(years) | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.1 |

Summarized	information	about	outstanding	stock	options	as	of	December	31,	2009	that	are	already	vested	and	that	we	expect	to	vest,	as	well	as	stock	options	that	are	currently	exercisable,	is	as	follows:

|  | Options	Already<br>Vested	and	Expected<br>to	Vest* | Options<br>that	are<br>Exercisable |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Number\tof\toutstanding\toptions\t(in\tthousands) | 16,008 | 10,181 |
| Weighted\taverage\tremaining\tcontractual\tlife | 6.3\tyears | 5.3\tyears |
| Weighted\taverage\texercise\tprice\tper\tshare | $67.37 | $68.85 |
| Intrinsic\tvalue\t(in\tmillions) | $75.3 | $38.6 |

# * Includes	effects	of	estimated	forfeitures

As	of	December	31,	2009,	there	was	$85.1	million	of	unrecognized	share-based	payment	expense	related	to	nonvested	stock	options	granted	under	our	plans.	That	expense	is	expected	to	be	recognized	over	a	weighted	average	period of	2.3	years.

# Performance	Shares	and	RSUs

We	have	utilized	both	performance	shares	and	RSUs	as	share-based	payments	to	our	employees.	Some	of	these	awards	have	had	service	conditions	while	others	have	had	performance	conditions.	The	terms	of	the	service	condition awards	have	been	either	two	or	four	years	with	vesting	occurring	ratably	on	the	anniversary	date	of	the	award.	However,	based	upon	meeting	certain	criteria,	as	established	under	our	equity	compensation	plans,	these	awards	may	accelerate upon	retirement	after	the	first	anniversary	date	of	the	award.	Accordingly,	the	requisite	service	period	used	for	share-based	payment	expense	ranges	from	one	to	four	years.

The	vesting	of	the	awards	with	performance	conditions	was	based	upon	the	achievement	of	objective	performance	targets	over	multiple	year	periods.	For	these	performance-based	awards,	it	was	determined	in	2008	that	the performance	targets	would	not	be	achieved.	Accordingly,	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	no	performance-based	awards	were	outstanding.

A	summary	of	nonvested	RSU	activity	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009	is	as	follows	(in	thousands):

|  | RSUs | Value |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Outstanding\tat\tJanuary\t1,\t2009 | 169 | $64.93 |
| Granted | 573 | 40.33 |
| Vested | (118) | 68.27 |
| Forfeited | (189) | 41.28 |
| Outstanding\tat\tDecember\t31,\t2009 | 435 | 42.09 |

The	fair	value	of	the	awards	was	determined	based	upon	the	fair	market	value	of	our	common	stock	on	the	date	of	grant.	We	are	required	to	estimate	the	number	of	RSUs	that	will	vest	and	recognize	share-based	payment	expense	on	a straight-line	basis	over	the	requisite	service	period.	As	of	December	31,	2009,	we	estimate	that	approximately	404,000	outstanding	RSUs	will	vest.	If	our	estimate	were	to	change	in	the	future,	the	cumulative	effect	of	the	change	in	estimate will	be	recorded	in	that	period.	Based	upon	the	number	of	RSUs	that	we	expect	to	vest,	the	unrecognized	share-based	payment	expense	as	of	December	31,	2009	was	$13.2	million	and	is	expected	to	be	recognized	over	a	weighted-average period	of	3.1	years.	For	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007,	pre-tax	expense	(income)	related	to	these	awards	was	$13.4	million,	$4.5	million	and	$(3.3)	million,	respectively,	or	$9.7	million,	$3.2	million	and	$(2.3)	million net	of	the	related	tax	benefits,	respectively.

# 4. INVENTORIES

Inventories	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008	consist	of	the	following	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Finished\tgoods | $718.6 | $731.2 |
| Work\tin\tprogress | 48.0 | 52.6 |
| Raw\tmaterials | 146.6 | 144.5 |
| Inventories,\tnet | $913.2 | $928.3 |

Reserves	for	excess	and	obsolete	inventory	were	$255.1	million	and	$199.6	million	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.	Included	in	finished	goods	inventory	at	December	31,	2009	is	approximately	$1.3	million	of	inventory step-up	resulting	from	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition.	Inventory	step-up	values	are	based	upon	estimated	sales	prices	less	distribution	costs	and	a	profit	allowance.	Included	in	finished	goods	inventory	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008	is approximately	$9.4	million	and	$11.3	of	capitalized	share-based	payment	expense,	respectively.

# 5. PROPERTY,	PLANT	AND	EQUIPMENT

Property,	plant	and	equipment	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008	was	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Land | $21.8 | $21.7 |
| Building\tand\tequipment | 1,147.7 | 992.7 |
| Capitalized\tsoftware\tcosts | 158.8 | 136.7 |
| Instruments | 1,210.2 | 1,161.7 |
| Construction\tin\tprogress | 62.0 | 149.0 |
|  | 2,600.5 | 2,461.8 |
| Accumulated\tdepreciation | (1,378.8) | (1,197.7) |
| Property,\tplant\tand\tequipment,\tnet | $1,221.7 | $1,264.1 |

# 6. ACQUISITIONS

We	made	acquisitions	during	the	years	2009,	2008	and	2007,	the	most	significant	of	which	was	our	acquisition	of	Abbott	Spine	in	2008,	which	is	described	below.	The	results	of	operations	of	the	acquired	companies	have	been included	in	our	consolidated	results	of	operations	subsequent	to	the	transaction	dates,	and	the	respective	assets	and	liabilities	of	the	acquired	companies	have	been	recorded	at	their	estimated	fair	values	in	our	consolidated	statement	of financial	position	as	of	the	transaction	dates,	with	any	excess	purchase	price	being	allocated	to	goodwill.	Pro	forma	financial	information	and	other	information	required	by	the	FASB's	guidance	on	business	combinations	have	not	been included	as	the	acquisitions	did	not	have	a	material	impact	upon	our	financial	position	or	results	of	operations.

# Abbott	Spine

In	October	2008,	we	acquired	Abbott	Spine,	a	former	subsidiary	of	Abbott	Laboratories,	for	an	aggregate	value	of	approximately	$363.0	million,	including	a	$358.0	million	cash	purchase	price	after	certain	working	capital adjustments	and	$5.0	million	of	direct	acquisition	costs.

       In	2009	we	completed	the	final	purchase	price	allocation,	which	reflects	additional	contract	termination	liabilities,	changes	to	the	preliminary	fair	values	assigned	to	acquired	inventory	and	changes	to	deferred	taxes.

The	following	table	summarizes	the	estimates	of	fair	value	of	the	assets	acquired	and	liabilities	assumed	at	the	date	of	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition	(in	millions):

| adjustments	and	$5.0	million	of	direct	acquisition	costs. |  |
| :--- | :--- |
| In\t2009\twe\tcompleted\tthe\tfinal\tpurchase\tprice\tallocation,\twhich\treflects\tadditional\tcontract\ttermination\tliabilities,\tchanges\tto\tthe\tpreliminary\tfair\tvalues\tassigned\tto\tacquired\tinventory\tand\tchanges\tto\tdeferred\ttaxes. |  |
| The\tfollowing\ttable\tsummarizes\tthe\testimates\tof\tfair\tvalue\tof\tthe\tassets\tacquired\tand\tliabilities\tassumed\tat\tthe\tdate\tof\tthe\tAbbott\tSpine\tacquisition\t(in\tmillions): | As\tof\tOctober\t16,\n2008 |
| Current\tassets | $61.4 |
| Property,\tplant\tand\tequipment | 6.5 |
| Instruments | 17.5 |
| Intangible\tassets\tsubject\tto\tamortization: |  |
| Customer\trelationships\t(10\tyear\tuseful\tlife) | 8.6 |
| Developed\ttechnology\t(10\tyear\tuseful\tlife) | 64.3 |
| In-process\tresearch\tand\tdevelopment | 38.5 |
| Other\tassets | 10.0 |
| Goodwill | 203.2 |
| Total\tassets\tacquired | 410.0 |
| Current\tliabilities | 19.5 |
| Deferred\ttaxes | 27.5 |
| Total\tliabilities\tassumed | 47.0 |
| Net\tassets\tacquired | $363.0 |

Goodwill	of	$130.6	million,	$69.9	million	and	$2.7	million	was	assigned	to	the	Americas,	Europe	and	Asia	Pacific	reporting	segments,	respectively.	None	of	the	goodwill	is	deductible	for	tax	purposes.

# 7. FAIR	VALUE	MEASUREMENTS	OF	ASSETS	AND	LIABILITIES

The	following	financial	assets	and	liabilities	are	recorded	at	fair	value	on	a	recurring	basis	as	of	December	31,	2009	(in	millions):

| Description | Recorded<br>Balance | Quoted	Prices<br>in	Active<br>Markets	for<br>Identical<br>Assets<br>(Level	1) | Significant	Other<br>Observable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	2) | Significant<br>Unobservable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	3) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Assets |  |  |  |  |
| Available-for-sale\tsecurities | $0.9 | $0.9 | $– | $– |
| Derivatives,\tcurrent\tand\tnon-current | 12.4 | – | 12.4 | – |
|  | $13.3 | $0.9 | $12.4 | $ |
| Liabilities\nDerivatives,\tcurrent\tand\tnon-current | $32.7 | $– | $32.7 | $– |
|  | $32.7 | $– | $32.7 | $– |

Available-for-sale	securities	are	valued	using	a	market	approach,	based	on	quoted	prices	for	the	specific	security	from	transactions	in	active	exchange	markets.	Derivatives	relate	to	foreign	currency	exchange	forward	contracts	and foreign	currency	options	entered	into	with	various	third	parties.	We	value	these	instruments	using	a	market	approach	based	on	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	obtained	from	active	markets	and	perform	an	assessment	of	counterparty	credit risk.

The	following	nonfinancial	assets	were	measured	at	fair	value	on	a	nonrecurring	basis	during	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009	(in	millions):

| Description | Year	Ended<br>December	31,<br>2009 | Quoted	Prices<br>in	Active<br>Markets	for<br>Identical<br>Assets<br>(Level	1) | Significant	Other<br>Observable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	2) | Significant<br>Unobservable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	3) | Total<br>Losses |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Goodwill | $342.9 | $– | $– | $342.9 | $73.0 |
|  | $342.9 | $– | $– | $342.9 | $73.0 |

In	2009,	goodwill	relating	to	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit	with	a	carrying	amount	of	$415.9	million	was	written	down	to	its	implied	fair	value	of	$342.9	million,	resulting	in	an	impairment	charge	of	$73.0	million.	The	implied	fair value	of	goodwill	equals	the	estimated	fair	value	of	a	reporting	unit	minus	the	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit's	net	assets.	Accordingly,	in	determining	the	implied	fair	value	of	the	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit	goodwill,	we	used	unobservable inputs	to	estimate	the	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit	and	its	assets	and	liabilities.	Fair	value	was	determined	using	an	equal	weighting	of	income	and	market	approaches.	Fair	value	under	the	income	approach	was	determined	by	discounting to	present	value	the	estimated	future	cash	flows	of	the	reporting	unit.	Fair	value	under	the	market	approach	utilized	the	comparable	transaction	methodology,	which	uses	valuation	indicators	determined	from	sales	of	other	businesses	that	are similar	to	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit.	In	estimating	the	future	cash	flows	of	the	reporting	unit,	we	utilized	a	combination	of	market	and	company	specific	inputs	that	a	market	participant	would	use	in	assessing	the	fair	value	of	the	reporting unit.	The	primary	market	input	was	revenue	growth	rates.	These	rates	were	based	upon	historical	trends	and	estimated	future	growth	drivers	such	as	an	aging	global	population,	obesity	and	more	active	lifestyles.	Significant	company	specific inputs	included	assumptions	regarding	how	the	reporting	unit	could	leverage	operating	expenses	as	revenue	grows	and	the	impact	any	new	products	will	have	on	revenues.	Under	the	comparable	transaction	methodology,	we	took	into consideration	when	the	comparable	transaction	occurred	and	the	differences	that	may	exist	due	to	changes	in	the	economic	environment.	We	also	took	into	consideration	differences	between	the	comparable	companies	and	our	U.S.	Spine reporting	unit	that	could	affect	fair	value,	such	as	cash	and	debt	levels.

The	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit's	assets	and	liabilities	were	determined	by	using	the	same	methods	that	are	used	in	business	combination	purchase	accounting.	See	Note	8	for	further	information	regarding	this	goodwill impairment.

There	were	no	other	significant	nonfinancial	assets	that	were	measured	at	fair	value	in	the	year	ending	December	31,	2009.

# 8. GOODWILL	AND	OTHER	INTANGIBLE	ASSETS

The	following	table	summarizes	the	changes	in	the	carrying	amount	of	goodwill	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009	and	2008	(in	millions):

|  | Americas | Europe | Asia	Pacific | Total |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Balance\tat\tJanuary\t1,\t2008 |  |  |  |  |
| Goodwill | $1,443.5 | $1,066.3 | $111.6 | $2,621.4 |
| Accumulated\timpairment\tlosses | – | – | – | – |
|  | 1,443.5 | 1,066.3 | 111.6 | 2,621.4 |
| Change\tin\tfair\tvalue\testimates\tof\tCenterpulse\trelated\tto: |  |  |  |  |
| Integration\tliability | – | (0.1) | – | (0.1) |
| Income\ttaxes | (22.7) | (0.9) | – | (23.6) |
| Change\tin\tfair\tvalue\testimates\tof\tEndius\trelated\tto: |  |  |  |  |
| Integration\tliability | 0.2 | – | – | 0.2 |
| Income\ttaxes | (4.0) | – | – | (4.0) |
| Change\tin\tfair\tvalue\testimates\tof\tORTHOsoft\trelated\tto: |  |  |  |  |
| Developed\ttechnology | 0.8 | – | – | 0.8 |
| Income\ttaxes | (1.0) | – | – | (1.0) |
| Other | 0.1 | – | – | 0.1 |
| Purchase\tof\tAbbott\tSpine | 129.3 | 65.7 | 2.4 | 197.4 |
| Other | – | (0.5) | – | (0.5) |
| Currency\ttranslation | (5.9) | (20.4) | 10.4 | (15.9) |
| Balance\tat\tDecember\t31,\t2008 |  |  |  |  |
| Goodwill | 1,540.3 | 1,110.1 | 124.4 | 2,774.8 |
| Accumulated\timpairment\tlosses | – | – | – | – |
|  | 1,540.3 | 1,110.1 | 124.4 | 2,774.8 |
| Change\tin\tfair\tvalue\testimates\tof\tAbbott\tSpine\trelated\tto: |  |  |  |  |
| Integration\tliability | 1.0 | 4.2 | 0.3 | 5.5 |
| Inventory | 2.2 | – | – | 2.2 |
| Income\ttaxes | (1.9) | – | – | (1.9) |
| U.S.\tSpine\treporting\tunit\timpairment | (73.0) | – | – | (73.0) |
| Other\tacquisitions | – | 5.0 | – | 5.0 |
| Currency\ttranslation | 6.3 | 53.8 | 10.8 | 70.9 |
| Balance\tat\tDecember\t31,\t2009 |  |  |  |  |
| Goodwill | 1,547.9 | 1,173.1 | 135.5 | 2,856.5 |
| Accumulated\timpairment\tlosses | (73.0) | – | – | (73.0) |
| $1,474.9 | $1,474.9 | $1,173.1 | $135.5 | $2,783.5 |

We	conduct	our	annual	impairment	test	in	the	fourth	quarter	of	every	year	or	whenever	events	occur	or	circumstances	change	that	would	more	likely	than	not	reduce	the	fair	value	of	a	reporting	unit	below	its	carrying	amount.	In	the fourth	quarter	of	2009,	we	determined	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	unit's	carrying	value	was	in	excess	of	its	estimated	fair	value.	Fair	value	was	determined	using	an	equal	weighting	of	income	and	market	approaches.	Factors	that	contributed	to the	estimated	fair	value	of	the	reporting	unit	to	be	below	its	carrying	value	included	a	decrease	in	projected	revenues	related	to	the	Dynesys	Dynamic	Stabilization	System.	This	product	line	experienced	increased	competition	and	insurance reimbursement	issues	in	2009.	We	have	been	seeking	approval	from	the	FDA	to	market	this	product	differently	in	the	U.S.,	which	would	enhance	its	position	in	the	market.	However,	in	November	2009	an	FDA	advisory	panel	issued	a	non- approvable	recommendation,	increasing	the	uncertainty	of	the

estimated	future	cash	flows.	In	addition	to	the	Dynesys	product,	revenues	from	other	products	have	been	affected	as	we	work	through	the	integration	of	the	sales	channel	following	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition.

As	a	result,	we	recorded	a	related	goodwill	impairment	charge	of	approximately	$73.0	million	during	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009.	Before	the	impairment	charge,	goodwill	assigned	to	this	reporting	unit	was	approximately $416	million,	of	which	approximately	two-thirds	arose	from	the	Centerpulse	acquisition	in	2003	and	the	remaining	from	the	Abbott	Spine	acquisition	in	2008.

We	will	continue	to	monitor	the	fair	value	of	our	U.S.	Spine	reporting	until	as	well	as	our	other	five	reporting	units	in	our	interim	and	annual	reporting	periods.	If	our	estimated	cash	flows	for	these	reporting	units	decrease,	we	may have	to	record	further	impairment	charges	in	the	future.	Factors	that	could	result	in	our	cash	flows	being	lower	than	our	current	estimates	include:	1)	decreased	revenues	caused	by	changes	in	the	healthcare	market,	or	our	inability	to generate	new	product	revenue	from	our	research	and	development	activities,	and	2)	if	we	are	not	able	to	achieve	the	estimated	operating	margins	in	our	forecasts	due	to	unforeseen	factors.	Additionally,	changes	in	the	broader	economic environment	could	cause	changes	to	our	estimated	discount	rates	which	will	impact	our	estimated	fair	values.

The	components	of	identifiable	intangible	assets	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | Core<br>Technology | Developed<br>Technology | Intellectual<br>Property<br>Rights | Trademarks<br>and	Trade<br>Names | Customer<br>Relationships | Other | Total |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| As\tof\tDecember\t31,\t2009: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Intangible\tassets\tsubject\tto\tamortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Gross\tcarrying\tamount | $144.1 | $499.1 | $145.2 | $34.7 | $129.2 | $51.5 | $1,003.8 |
| Accumulated\tamortization | (44.0) | (183.5) | (40.3) | (20.0) | (23.4) | (31.1) | (342.3) |
| Intangible\tassets\tnot\tsubject\tto\tamortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Gross\tcarrying\tamount | – | – | – | 196.5 | – | – | 196.5 |
| Total\tidentifiable\tintangible\tassets | $100.1 | $315.6 | $104.9 | $211.2 | $105.8 | $20.4 | $858.0 |
| As\tof\tDecember\t31,\t2008: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Intangible\tassets\tsubject\tto\tamortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Gross\tcarrying\tamount | $144.1 | $498.8 | $109.4 | $35.6 | $93.6 | $42.9 | $924.4 |
| Accumulated\tamortization | (36.0) | (147.5) | (6.7) | (16.6) | (15.6) | (26.9) | (249.3) |
| Intangible\tassets\tnot\tsubject\tto\tamortization: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Gross\tcarrying\tamount | – | – | – | 197.0 | – | – | 197.0 |
| Total\tidentifiable\tintangible\tassets | $108.1 | $351.3 | $102.7 | $216.0 | $78.0 | $16.0 | $872.1 |

During	2009,	we	made	lump-sum	payments	of	$35.8	million	to	certain	healthcare	professionals	and	institutions	in	place	of	future	royalty	payments	that	otherwise	would	have	been	due	under	the	terms	of	existing	contractual arrangements.	Such	payments	were	based	upon	a	third	party	fair	market	valuation	of	the	current	net	present	value	of	the	contractual	arrangements.	Under	the	terms	of	these	resolutions,	we	acquired	the	exclusive	rights	to	any	intellectual property,	patented	and	unpatented,	provided	by	the	healthcare	professional	or	institution	during	the	course	of	the	original	contractual	arrangements.	The	weighted	average	useful	life	for	these	assets	is	5.6	years,	which	represents	the	life	of any	related	patent	or	the	period	for	which	we	maintain	exclusivity	to	the	intellectual	property.	Amortization	expense	for	these	assets	is	reported	as	part	of	cost	of	goods	sold.

Total	amortization	expense	for	finite-lived	intangible	assets	was	$93.2	million,	$59.3	million	and	$47.4	million	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007,	respectively.	For	2009,	$33.6	million	of	amortization	expense was	recorded	as	part	of	cost	of	goods	sold,	with	the	remaining	$59.6	million	recorded	as	part	of	selling,	general	and	administrative	expenses.	For	2008,	$6.7	million	of	amortization	expense	was	recorded	as	part	of	cost	of	goods	sold,	with the	remaining	$52.6	million	recorded	as	part	of	selling,	general	and	administrative	expenses.	For	2007,	all	amortization	expense	was	recorded	as	part	of	selling,	general	and	administrative	expenses.	Estimated	annual	amortization	expense for	the	years	ending	December	31,	2010	through	2014	is	$89.7	million,	$80.9	million,	$73.4	million,	$66.8	million	and	$62.6	million,	respectively.

# 9. OTHER	CURRENT	AND	LONG-TERM	LIABILITIES

Other	current	and	long-term	liabilities	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008	consist	of	the	following	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Other\tcurrent\tliabilities: |  |  |
| License\tand\tservice\tagreements | $108.0 | $169.6 |
| Certain\tclaims\taccrual\t(Note\t17) | 42.5 | 62.8 |
| Salaries,\twages\tand\tbenefits | 95.7 | 91.5 |
| Accrued\tliabilities | 252.4 | 234.2 |
| Total\tother\tcurrent\tliabilities | $498.6 | $558.1 |
| Other\tlong-term\tliabilities: |  |  |
| Long-term\tincome\ttax\tpayable | $94.3 | $116.9 |
| Accrued\tretirement\tand\tpostretirement\tbenefit\tplans | 32.9 | 129.9 |
| Certain\tclaims\taccrual\t(Note\t17) | 29.4 | – |
| Other\tlong-term\tliabilities | 171.9 | 107.1 |
| Total\tother\tlong-term\tliabilities | $328.5 | $353.9 |

In	November	2009,	we	sold	$500	million	aggregate	principal	amount	of	our	4.625%	Senior	Notes	due	November	30,	2019	and	$500	million	aggregate	principal	amount	of	our	5.75%	Senior	Notes	due	November	30,	2039	(Senior Notes)	in	a	public	offering.	Interest	is	payable	on	May	30	and	November	30	of	each	year	beginning	on	May	30,	2010	until	maturity.	We	received	net	proceeds	of	approximately	$998.8	million,	net	of	an	offering	discount	of	$1.2	million.	The Senior	Notes	carry	an	effective	interest	rate	of	4.634%	and	5.762%,	respectively.	We	used	the	proceeds	to	repay	amounts	outstanding	under	our	senior	credit	facility,	to	finance	our	stock	repurchase	program	and	for	general	corporate purposes.

We	have	a	five	year	$1,350	million	senior	credit	agreement	(Senior	Credit	Facility).	The	Senior	Credit	Facility	is	a	revolving,	multi-currency,	senior	unsecured	credit	facility	maturing	November	30,	2012.	Available	borrowings	under the	Senior	Credit	Facility	at	December	31,	2009	were	$1,221.2	million.	The	Senior	Credit	Facility	contains	provisions	whereby	borrowings	may	be	increased	to	$1,750	million.

We	and	certain	of	our	wholly	owned	foreign	subsidiaries	are	the	borrowers	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility.	Borrowings	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	bear	interest	at	a	LIBOR-based	rate	plus	an	applicable	margin	determined	by reference	to	our	senior	unsecured	long-term	credit	rating	and	the	amounts	drawn	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility,	at	an	alternate	base	rate,	or	at	a	fixed	rate	determined	through	a	competitive	bid	process.	The	Senior	Credit	Facility	contains customary	affirmative	and	negative	covenants	and	events	of	default	for	an	unsecured	financing	arrangement,	including,	among	other	things,	limitations	on	consolidations,	mergers	and	sales	of	assets.	Financial	covenants	include	a	maximum leverage	ratio	of	3.0	to	1.0	and	a	minimum	interest	coverage	ratio	of	3.5	to	1.0.	If	we	fall	below	an	investment	grade	credit	rating,	additional	restrictions	would	result,	including	restrictions	on	investments,	payment	of	dividends	and	stock repurchases.	We	were	in	compliance	with	all	covenants	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	as	of	December	31,	2009.	Commitments	under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	are	subject	to	certain	fees,	including	a	facility	and	a	utilization	fee.	Borrowings under	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	were	Japanese	Yen-based	borrowings	at	December	31,	2009	and	U.S.	Dollar	and	Japanese	Yen-based	borrowings	at	December	31,	2008.

Outstanding	long-term	debt	as	of	December	31,	2009	was	$1,127.6	million,	comprised	of	$998.8	million	from	our	Senior	Notes	and	$128.8	from	our	Senior	Credit	Facility.	As	of	December	31,	2008,	$460.1	million	was	outstanding from	our	Senior	Credit	Facility.	We	had	no	short-term	debt	as	of	December	31,	2009	or	2008.	The	estimated	fair	value	of	our	Senior	Notes	as	of	December	31,	2009	was	$992.1	million.	The	carrying	value	of	the	Senior	Credit	Facility approximates	fair	value,	as	the	underlying	instruments	have	variable	interest	rates	at	market	value.

Debt	issuance	costs	of	$22.8	million	were	incurred	to	obtain	the	Senior	Credit	Facility	and	debt	issuance	costs	of	$8.5	million	were	incurred	during	the	sale	of	our	Senior	Notes.	These	costs	were	capitalized	and	are	amortized	to interest	expense	over	the	lives	of	the	related	facility	and	the	Senior	Notes.	At	December	31,	2009,	total	unamortized	debt	issuance	costs	were	$11.7	million.

# 11. DERIVATIVE	INSTRUMENTS	AND	HEDGING	ACTIVITIES

We	are	exposed	to	certain	market	risks	relating	to	our	ongoing	business	operations,	including	foreign	currency	risk,	commodity	price	risk,	interest	rate	risk	and	credit	risk.	We	manage	our	exposure	to	these	and	other	market	risks through	regular	operating	and	financing	activities.	Currently,	the	only	risk	that	we	manage	through	the	use	of	derivative	instruments	is	foreign	currency	risk.

We	operate	on	a	global	basis	and	are	exposed	to	the	risk	that	our	financial	condition,	results	of	operations	and	cash	flows	could	be	adversely	affected	by	changes	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates.	To	reduce	the	potential	effects	of foreign	currency	exchange	rate	movements	on	net	earnings,	we	enter	into	derivative	financial	instruments	in	the	form	of	foreign	currency	exchange	forward	contracts	and	options	with	major	financial	institutions.	We	are	primarily	exposed	to foreign	currency	exchange	rate	risk	with	respect	to	transactions	and	net	assets	denominated	in	Euros,	Swiss	Francs,	Japanese	Yen,	British	Pounds,	Canadian	Dollars,	Australian	Dollars,	Korean	Won	and	Swedish	Krona.	We	do	not	use derivative	financial	instruments	for	trading	or	speculative	purposes.

We	report	all	derivative	instruments	as	assets	or	liabilities	on	the	balance	sheet	at	fair	value.

# Derivatives	Designated	as	Hedging	Instruments

Our	revenues	are	generated	in	various	currencies	throughout	the	world.	However,	a	significant	amount	of	our	inventory	is	produced	in	U.S.	Dollars.	Therefore,	movements	in	foreign	currency	exchange	rates	may	have	different proportional	effects	on	our	revenues	compared	to	our	cost	of	products	sold.	To	minimize	the	effects	of	foreign	currency	exchange	rate	movements	on	cash	flows,	we	hedge	intercompany	sales	of	inventory	expected	to	occur	within	the	next 30	months	with	foreign	currency	exchange	forward	contracts	and	options.	We	designate	these	derivative	instruments	as	cash	flow	hedges.	We	have	not	entered	into	any	derivative	instruments	designated	as	fair	value	or	net	investment	in foreign	operation	hedges.

We	perform	quarterly	assessments	of	hedge	effectiveness	by	verifying	and	documenting	the	critical	terms	of	the	hedge	instrument	and	that	forecasted	transactions	have	not	changed	significantly.	We	also	assess	on	a	quarterly	basis whether	there	have	been	adverse	developments	regarding	the	risk	of	a	counterparty	default.	For	derivatives	which	qualify	as	hedges	of	future	cash	flows,	the	effective	portion	of	changes	in	fair	value	is	temporarily	recorded	in	other comprehensive	income	and	then	recognized	in	cost	of	products	sold	when	the	hedged	item	affects	net	earnings.	The	ineffective	portion	of	a	derivative's	change	in	fair	value,	if	any,	is	reported	in	cost	of	products	sold	immediately.	The	net amount	recognized	in	earnings	during	2009	and	2008	due	to	ineffectiveness	and	amounts	excluded	from	the	assessment	of	hedge	effectiveness	was	not	significant.

For	forward	contracts	and	options	outstanding	at	December	31,	2009,	we	have	obligations	to	purchase	U.S.	Dollars	and	sell	Euros,	Japanese	Yen,	British	Pounds,	Canadian	Dollars,	Australian	Dollars,	Korean	Won	and	Swedish	Krona and	purchase	Swiss	Francs	and	sell	U.S.	Dollars	at	set	maturity	dates	ranging	from	January	2010	through	June	2012.	The	notional	amounts	of	outstanding	forward	contracts	and	options	entered	into	with	third	parties	to	purchase	U.S.	Dollars at	December	31,	2009	were	$1.1	billion.	The	notional	amounts	of	outstanding	forward	contracts	entered	into	with	third	parties	to	purchase	Swiss	Francs	at	December	31,	2009	were	$202	million.

As	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	all	derivative	instruments	designated	as	cash	flow	hedges	are	recorded	at	fair	value	on	the	balance	sheet.	On	our	consolidated	balance	sheet,	we	recognize	individual	forward	contracts	and	options with	the	same	counterparty	on	a	net	asset/liability	basis	if	we	have	a	master	netting	agreement	with	the	counterparty.	The	fair	value	of	derivative	instruments	on	a	gross	basis	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008	is	as	follows	(in	millions):

| Asset	Derivatives |  |  |  |  |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Foreign\texchange\tforward\tcontracts\nForeign\texchange\toptions\nForeign\texchange\tforward\tcontracts | Other\tcurrent\tassets\nOther\tcurrent\tassets\nOther\tassets | $23.3\n–\n6.3 | Other\tcurrent\tassets\nOther\tcurrent\tassets\nOther\tassets | $53.7\n4.6\n30.3 |
| Total\tasset\tderivatives |  | $29.6 |  | $88.6 |
| Liability\tDerivatives |  |  |  |  |
| Foreign\texchange\tforward\tcontracts\nForeign\texchange\tforward\tcontracts | Other\tcurrent\tliabilities\nOther\tlong-term\tliabilities | $35.4\n14.5 | Other\tcurrent\tliabilities\nOther\tlong-term\tliabilities | $34.4\n17.7 |
| Total\tliability\tderivatives |  | $49.9 |  | $52.1 |

The	fair	value	of	outstanding	derivative	instruments	recorded	on	the	balance	sheet	at	December	31,	2009,	together	with	settled	derivatives	where	the	hedged	item	has	not	yet	affected	earnings,	was	a	net	unrealized	loss	of $24.9	million,	or	$14.1	million	net	of	taxes,	which	is	deferred	in	other	comprehensive	income,	of	which	$11.0	million,	or	$5.3	million	net	of	taxes,	is	expected	to	be	reclassified	to	earnings	over	the	next	twelve	months.

Derivative	instruments	had	the	following	effects	on	other	comprehensive	income	on	our	consolidated	balance	sheet	and

our	consolidated	statement	of	earnings	on	a	gross	basis	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009	and	2008	(in	millions):

# Derivatives	Not	Designated	as	Hedging	Instruments

We	enter	into	foreign	currency	forward	exchange	contracts	with	terms	of	one	month	to	manage	currency	exposures	for	monetary	assets	and	liabilities	denominated	in	a	currency	other	than	an	entity's	functional	currency.	As	a	result, any	foreign	currency	remeasurement	gains/losses	recognized	in	earnings	are	generally	offset	with	gains/losses	on	the	foreign	currency	forward	exchange	contracts	in	the	same	reporting	period.	These	offsetting	gains/losses	are	recorded	in cost	of	products	sold	as	the	underlying	assets	and	liabilities	exposed	to	remeasurement	include	inventory-related	transactions.	These	contracts	are	settled	on	the	last	day	of	each	reporting	period.	Therefore,	there	is	no	outstanding	balance related	to	these	contracts	recorded	on	the	balance	sheet	as	of	the	end	of	the	reporting	period.	The	notional	amounts	of	these	contracts	are	typically	in	a	range	of	$1.2	billion	to	$1.4	billion	per	quarter.

The	following	gains/(losses)	from	these	derivative	instruments	were	recognized	in	cost	of	products	sold	on	our	consolidated	statement	of	earnings	(in	millions):

| Derivative	Instrument | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Foreign\texchange\tforward\tcontracts | $(10.3) | $(2.2) |
| Total | $(10.3) | $(2.2) |

This	impact	does	not	include	any	offsetting	gains/losses	recognized	in	earnings	as	a	result	of	foreign	currency	remeasurement	of	monetary	assets	and	liabilities	denominated	in	a	currency	other	than	an	entity's	functional	currency.

# 12. RETIREMENT	BENEFIT	PLANS

We	have	defined	benefit	pension	plans	covering	certain	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	employees.	The	employees	who	are	not	participating	in	the	defined	benefit	plans	receive	additional	benefits	under	our	defined	contribution	plans.	Plan benefits	are	primarily	based	on	years	of	credited	service	and	the	participant's	average	eligible	compensation.	In	addition	to	the	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	defined	benefit	pension	plans,	we	sponsor	various	non-U.S.	pension	arrangements, including	retirement	and	termination	benefit	plans	required	by	local	law	or	coordinated	with	government	sponsored	plans.

We	use	a	December	31	measurement	date	for	our	benefit	plans.

# Defined	Benefit	Plans

The	components	of	net	pension	expense	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	for	our	defined	benefit	retirement	plans	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico | Non-U.S. | Non-U.S. | Non-U.S. |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| Service\tcost | $12.3 | $11.7 | $13.0 | $13.7 | $12.1 | $10.8 |
| Interest\tcost | 10.6 | 9.7 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 7.3 | 5.7 |
| Expected\treturn\ton\tplan\tassets | (16.4) | (13.5) | (10.9) | (8.2) | (9.3) | (8.0) |
| Curtailment | 0.4 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Settlement | – | 3.4 | – | – | 0.1 | – |
| Amortization\tof\tprior\tservice\tcost | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | (0.7) | (0.1) | – |
| Amortization\tof\tunrecognized\tactuarial\tloss | 4.1 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Net\tperiodic\tbenefit\tcost | $11.1 | $13.6 | $13.8 | $13.5 | $10.2 | $8.7 |

The	weighted	average	actuarial	assumptions	used	to	determine	net	pension	expense	for	our	defined	benefit	retirement	plans	were	as	follows:

|  | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico | Non-U.S. | Non-U.S. | Non-U.S. |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| Discount\trate | 5.79% | 6.16% | 6.14% | 3.40% | 3.60% | 3.64% |
| Rate\tof\tcompensation\tincrease | 3.84% | 3.84% | 3.84% | 2.39% | 3.06% | 3.12% |
| Expected\tlong-term\trate\tof\treturn\ton\tplan\tassets | 7.75% | 8.00% | 8.00% | 4.16% | 4.64% | 4.73% |

The	expected	long-term	rate	of	return	on	plan	assets	is	based	on	the	historical	and	estimated	future	rates	of	return	on	the	different	asset	classes	held	in	the	plans.	The	expected	long-term	rate	of	return	is	the	weighted	average	of	the target	asset	allocation	of	each	individual	asset	class.	We	believe	that	historical	asset	results	approximate	expected	market	returns	applicable	to	the	funding	of	a	long-term	benefit	obligation.

Discount	rates	were	determined	for	each	of	our	defined	benefit	retirement	plans	at	their	measurement	date	to	reflect	the	yield	of	a	portfolio	of	high	quality	bonds	matched	against	the	timing	and	amounts	of	projected	future	benefit payments.

Changes	in	projected	benefit	obligations	and	plan	assets,	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009	and	2008	for	our	defined	benefit	retirement	plans,	were	(in	millions):

|  | U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico<br>2009 | 2008 | Non-U.S.<br>2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Projected\tbenefit\tobligation\t–\tbeginning\tof\tyear | $188.4 | $166.0 | $192.1 | $181.6 |
| Service\tcost | 12.3 | 11.7 | 13.7 | 12.1 |
| Interest\tcost | 10.6 | 9.7 | 6.8 | 7.3 |
| Employee\tcontributions | – | – | 12.0 | 14.5 |
| Benefits\tpaid | (2.6) | (9.7) | (27.0) | (22.5) |
| Actuarial\t(gain)\tloss | (21.0) | 11.8 | (3.0) | (8.5) |
| Prior\tservice\tcost | – | – | (5.0) | – |
| Curtailment | (0.1) | – | – | – |
| Settlement | – | (1.1) | – | – |
| Translation\tloss | – | – | 7.7 | 7.6 |
| Projected\tbenefit\tobligation\t–\tend\tof\tyear | $187.6 | $188.4 | $197.3 | $192.1 |
| Plan\tassets\tat\tfair\tmarket\tvalue\t–\tbeginning\tof\tyear | $138.5 | $147.2 | $163.7 | $180.4 |
| Actual\treturn\ton\tplan\tassets | 25.8 | (39.3) | 11.0 | (31.4) |
| Employer\tcontributions | 40.4 | 40.3 | 12.2 | 15.2 |
| Employee\tcontributions | – | – | 12.0 | 14.5 |
| Benefits\tpaid | (2.6) | (9.7) | (27.0) | (22.5) |
| Translation\tgain | – | – | 7.1 | 7.5 |
| Plan\tassets\tat\tfair\tmarket\tvalue\t–\tend\tof\tyear | $202.1 | $138.5 | $179.0 | $163.7 |
| Funded\tstatus | $14.5 | $(49.9) | $(18.3) | $(28.4) |
| Amounts\trecognized\tin\tconsolidated\tbalance\tsheet: |  |  |  |  |
| Prepaid\tpension | $21.4 | $– | $1.8 | $2.5 |
| Short-term\taccrued\tbenefit\tliability | (0.3) | (0.5) | – | – |
| Long-term\taccrued\tbenefit\tliability | (6.6) | (49.4) | (20.1) | (30.9) |
| Net\tamount\trecognized | $14.5 | $(49.9) | $(18.3) | $(28.4) |
| Amounts\trecognized\tin\taccumulated\tother\tcomprehensive\tincome: |  |  |  |  |
| Unrecognized\tprior\tservice\tcost | $0.5 | $0.9 | $(5.8) | $(1.3) |
| Unrecognized\tactuarial\tloss | 66.2 | 101.0 | 30.8 | 31.2 |
| Total\tamount\trecognized | $66.7 | $101.9 | $25.0 | $29.9 |

We	estimate	the	following	amounts	recorded	as	part	of	accumulated	other	comprehensive	income	will	be	recognized	as	part	of	our	net	pension	expense	during	2010	(in	millions):

|  | Puerto	Rico | Non-U.S. |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Unrecognized\tprior\tservice\tcost | $0.1 | $(0.6) |
| Unrecognized\tactuarial\tloss | 2.6 | 1.0 |
|  | $2.7 | $0.4 |

The	accumulated	benefit	obligation	for	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	defined	benefit	retirement	pension	plans	was	$148.3	million	and	$140.6	million	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.	The	accumulated	benefit	obligation	for non-U.S.	defined	benefit	retirement	plans	was	$186.6	million	and	$178.7	million	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.

The	benefits	expected	to	be	paid	out	in	each	of	the	next	five	years	and	for	the	five	years	combined	thereafter	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

| For	the	Years	Ending	December	31, | U.S.	and<br>Puerto	Rico | Non-U.S. |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 2010 | $3.7 | $16.1 |
| 2011 | 5.1 | 15.4 |
| 2012 | 6.5 | 15.2 |
| 2013 | 7.2 | 14.9 |
| 2014 | 8.5 | 15.0 |
| 2015-2019 | 64.0 | 78.2 |

The	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	defined	benefit	retirement	plans'	overall	investment	strategy	is	to	maximize	total	returns	by	emphasizing	long-term	growth	of	capital	while	avoiding	risk.	We	have	established	target	ranges	of	assets	held	by the	plans	of	50	to	75	percent	for	equity	securities	and	25	to	50	percent	for	debt	securities.	The	plans	strive	to	have	sufficiently	diversified	assets	so	that	adverse	or	unexpected	results	from	one	asset	class	will	not	have	an	unduly	detrimental impact	on	the	entire	portfolio.	The	investments	in	the	plans	may	be	rebalanced	quarterly	based	upon	the	target	asset	allocation	of	the	plans.

In	the	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico,	we	maintain	an	investment	policy	statement	that	guides	the	investment	allocation	in	the	plans.	The	investment	policy	statement	describes	the	target	asset	allocation	positions	described	above.	We	have	a benefits	committee	to	manage	the	general	philosophy,	objectives	and	process	of	the	plans.	The	benefits	committee	meets	quarterly	to	review	performance	and	to	ensure	that	the	current	investment	allocation	is	within	the	guidelines	set	forth	in the	investment	policy	statement.

The	investment	strategies	of	non-U.S.	based	plans	vary	according	to	the	plan	provisions	and	local	laws.	The	majority	of	the	assets	in	non-U.S.	based	plans	are	located	in	Switzerland	based	plans.	These	assets	are	held	in	trusts	and	are commingled	with	the	assets	of	other	Swiss	companies	with	representatives	of	all	the	companies	making	the	investment	decisions.	The	overall	strategy	is	to	maximize	total	returns	while	avoiding	risk.	The	trustees	of	the	assets	have established	target	ranges	of	assets	held	by	the	plans	of	30	to	50	percent	in	debt	securities,	20	to	37	percent	in	equity

securities,	15	to	24	percent	in	real	estate,	3	to	15	percent	in	cash	funds	and	0	to	12	percent	in	other	funds.

The	fair	value	of	our	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	pension	plan	assets	as	of	December	31,	2009,	by	asset	category	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

| Asset	Category | Total | Quoted	Prices<br>in	Active<br>Markets	for<br>Identical<br>Assets<br>(Level	1) | Significant<br>Other<br>Observable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	2) | Significant<br>Unobservable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	3) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cash\tand\tcash\tequivalents | $12.1 | $12.1 | $– | $– |
| Equity\tsecurities: |  |  |  |  |
| U.S.\tlarge-cap | 67.6 | – | 67.6 | – |
| U.S.\tsmall-cap | 20.8 | – | 20.8 | – |
| International | 22.5 | – | 22.5 | – |
| Intermediate\tfixed\tincome\tsecurities | 79.1 | – | 79.1 | – |
| Total | $202.1 | $12.1 | $190.0 | $– |

The	fair	value	of	our	non-U.S.	pension	plan	assets	as	of	December	31,	2009,	by	asset	category	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

Fair	Value	Measurements	at	Reporting	Date	Using:

| Asset	Category | Total | Quoted	Prices<br>in	Active<br>Markets	for<br>Identical<br>Assets<br>(Level	1) | Significant<br>Other<br>Observable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	2) | Significant<br>Unobservable<br>Inputs<br>(Level	3) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Cash\tand\tcash\tequivalents | $7.4 | $7.4 | $– | $– |
| Equity\tsecurities: |  |  |  |  |
| Energy | 1.6 | 1.6 | – | – |
| Materials | 1.3 | 1.3 | – | – |
| Industrials | 3.0 | 3.0 | – | – |
| Consumer\tdiscretionary | 2.2 | 2.2 | – | – |
| Consumer\tstaples | 3.5 | 3.5 | – | – |
| Healthcare | 6.3 | 6.3 | – | – |
| Financials | 5.7 | 5.7 | – | – |
| Information\ttechnology | 2.7 | 2.7 | – | – |
| Telecommunication\tservices | 1.0 | 1.0 | – | – |
| Utilities | 1.4 | 1.4 | – | – |
| Other\tequities | 23.2 | 20.5 | 2.7 | – |
| Fixed\tincome\tsecurities: |  |  |  |  |
| Government\tbonds | 29.5 | – | 29.5 | – |
| Corporate\tbonds | 36.9 | – | 36.9 | – |
| Asset-backed\tsecurities | 8.6 | – | 8.6 | – |
| Other\tdebt | 0.9 | – | 0.9 | – |
| Other\ttypes\tof\tinvestments: |  |  |  |  |
| Mortgage\tloans | 5.0 | – | 5.0 | – |
| Insurance\tcontracts | 5.1 | – | 5.1 | – |
| Other\tinvestments | 5.8 | – | 5.8 | – |
| Real\testate | 27.9 | – | – | 27.9 |
| Total | $179.0 | $56.6 | $94.5 | $27.9 |

As	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	our	defined	benefit	pension	plans'	assets	did	not	hold	any	direct	investment	in	Zimmer	Holdings	common	stock.

Equity	securities	are	valued	using	a	market	approach,	based	on	quoted	prices	for	the	specific	security	from	transactions	in	active	exchange	markets	(Level	1),	or	in	some	cases	where	we	are	invested	in	mutual	or	collective	funds,	based upon	the	net	asset	value	per	unit	of	the	fund	which	is	determined	from	quoted	market	prices	of	the	underlying	securities	in	the	fund's	portfolio	(Level	2).	Fixed	income	securities	are	valued	using	a	market	approach,	based	upon	quoted	prices for	the	specific	security	or	from	institutional	bid	evaluations.	Some	fixed	income	securities	are	in	funds	with	a	net	asset	value	per	unit	which	is	determined	using	similar	techniques	for	the	underlying	securities	in	the	fund's	portfolio.	Real estate	is	valued	by	discounting	to	present	value	the	cash	flows	expected	to	be	generated	by	the	specific	properties.

The	value	of	Level	3	assets	has	not	changed	significantly	from	the	prior	year.	Further	information	related	to	Level	3	assets	has	not	been	provided	as	we	do	not	consider	the	Level	3	assets	significant	to	the	consolidated	financial statements.

We	expect	that	we	will	have	no	minimum	funding	requirements	by	law	in	2010	for	the	qualified	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	defined	benefit	retirement	plans,	however,	subsequent	Congressional	action	may	impact	the	minimum	funding requirement	for	2010.	We	expect	to	voluntarily	contribute	between	$20	million	to	$30	million	to	these	plans	during	2010.	Contributions	to	non-U.S.	defined	benefit	plans	are	estimated	to	be	approximately	$14	million	in	2010.	We	do	not expect	the	plan	assets	in	any	of	our	plans	to	be	returned	to	us	in	the	next	year.

# Defined	Contribution	Plans

We	also	sponsor	defined	contribution	plans	for	substantially	all	of	the	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	employees	and	certain	employees	in	other	countries.	The	benefits	of	these	plans	relate	to	local	customs	and	practices	in	the	countries concerned.	We	expensed	$21.6	million,	$17.1	million	and	$14.0	million	related	to	these	plans	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007,	respectively.

# Postretirement	Benefit	Plans

During	2009	we	amended	the	postretirement	benefit	plans	for	certain	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico	employees.	Participants	in	the	plan	between	the	ages	of	55	and	65	that	were	previously	receiving	benefits	will	continue	to	receive	benefits until	reaching	the	age	of	65.	For	all	other	participants	in	the	plan,	no	benefits	will	be	paid	after	January	1,	2010.	Additionally,	we	funded	approximately	$7	million	to	a	Voluntary	Employees'	Beneficiary	Association	(VEBA)	trust	to	settle any	future	obligations.	We	recognized	a	curtailment	gain	and	settlement	loss	related	to	these	actions.

The	components	of	net	periodic	expense	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	for	our	unfunded	postretirement	benefit	plans	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Service\tcost | $0.8 | $1.5 | $1.6 |
| Interest\tcost | 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| Amortization\tof\tprior\tservice\tcost | (0.2) | (0.5) | (0.5) |
| Amortization\tof\tunrecognized\tactuarial\tloss | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| Settlement | 3.2 | – | – |
| Curtailment | (35.3) | – | – |
| Net\tperiodic\tbenefit\tcost | $(29.9) | $4.1 | $3.8 |

We	have	not	provided	further	disclosures	related	to	these	postretirement	benefit	plans	as	other	than	the	curtailment	gain	and	settlement	loss	in	2009	discussed	above,	these	plans	are	not	significant	to	our	results	of	operations	or financial	position.

# 13. INCOME	TAXES

The	components	of	earnings	before	taxes	consist	of	the	following	(in	millions):

| For	the	Years	Ending	December	31, | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| United\tStates\toperations | $489.7 | $618.8 | $597.0 |
| Foreign\toperations | 508.5 | 503.0 | 534.6 |
| Total | $998.2 | $1,121.8 | $1,131.6 |
| The\tprovision\tfor\tincome\ttaxes\tconsists\tof\t(in\tmillions): |  |  |  |
| Current: |  |  |  |
| Federal | $204.9 | $136.0 | $173.0 |
| State | 23.3 | 27.3 | 25.0 |
| Foreign | 72.3 | 107.0 | 96.0 |
|  | 300.5 | 270.3 | 294.0 |
| Deferred: |  |  |  |
| Federal | (17.4) | 31.6 | 39.0 |
| State | (3.1) | (2.0) | 19.0 |
| Foreign | 0.8 | (27.6) | 5.9 |
| (19.7) | (19.7) | 2.0 | 63.9 |
| Provision\tfor\tincome\ttaxes | $280.8 | $272.3 | $357.9 |

A	reconciliation	of	the	U.S.	statutory	income	tax	rate	to	our	effective	tax	rate	is	as	follows:

| For	the	Years	Ended	December	31, | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| U.S.\tstatutory\tincome\ttax\trate | 35.0% | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| State\ttaxes,\tnet\tof\tfederal\tdeduction | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.7 |
|  | (9.9) | (9.8) | (10.1) |
| Tax\tbenefit\trelating\tto\tU.S.\tmanufacturer's\tdeduction\tand\texport\tsales | (1.5) | (1.3) | (1.2) |
| R&amp;D\tcredit | (0.3) | (0.1) | (0.4) |
| 2007\tsettlement\t(tax\tbenefit) | – | (2.8) | 5.2 |
| In-process\tresearch\tand\tdevelopment\tcharges | – | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goodwill\timpairment | 2.6 | – | – |
| Other | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Effective\tincome\ttax\trate | 28.1% | 24.3% | 31.6% |

Our	operations	in	Puerto	Rico,	Switzerland	and	the	State	of	Indiana	benefit	from	various	tax	incentive	grants.	Unless	these	grants	are	extended,	they	will	expire	between	fiscal	years	2016	and	2019.

In	September	2007,	we	reached	a	settlement	with	the	U.S.	government	concerning	our	financial	relationships	with	consulting	orthopaedic	surgeons.	Under	the	terms	of	the	settlement,	we	paid	a	civil	settlement	amount	of $169.5	million,	and	we	recorded	an	expense	in	that	amount.	At	the	time,	no	tax	benefit	was	recorded	related	to	the	settlement	expense	due	to	the	uncertainty	as	to	the	tax	treatment.	During	the	third	quarter	of	2008,	we	reached	an	agreement with	the	U.S.	Internal	Revenue	Service	(IRS)	confirming	the	deductibility	of	a	portion	of	the	settlement	payment.	As	a	result,	during	2008	we	recorded	a	current	tax	benefit	of	$31.7	million.

Deferred	income	taxes	reflect	the	net	tax	effects	of	temporary	differences	between	the	carrying	amounts	of	assets	and	liabilities	for	financial	reporting	purposes	and	the	amounts	used	for	income	tax	purposes.	We	have	established valuation	allowances	for	deferred	tax	assets	when	the	amount	of	expected	future	taxable	income	is	not	likely	to	support	the	use	of	the	deduction	or	credit.

|  | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Deferred\ttax\tassets: |  |  |
| Inventory | $204.1 | $165.9 |
| Net\toperating\tloss\tcarryover | 37.5 | 64.8 |
| Tax\tcredit\tcarryover | 20.7 | 23.7 |
| Accrued\tliabilities | 78.3 | 105.4 |
| Share-based\tcompensation | 71.1 | 49.4 |
| Unremitted\tearnings\tof\tforeign\tsubsidiaries | 105.5 | 95.5 |
| Other | 49.9 | 38.4 |
| Total\tdeferred\ttax\tassets | 567.1 | 543.1 |
| Less:\tValuation\tallowances | (37.3) | (37.1) |
| Total\tdeferred\ttax\tassets\tafter\tvaluation | 529.8 | 506.0 |
| Deferred\ttax\tliabilities: |  |  |
| Fixed\tassets | $(105.0) | $(79.1) |
| Intangible\tassets | (162.7) | (188.1) |
| Accrued\tliabilities | (2.4) | (0.4) |
| Other | (1.5) | (4.4) |
| Total\tdeferred\ttax\tliabilities | (271.6) | (272.0) |
| Total\tnet\tdeferred\ttax\tassets | $258.2 | $234.0 |

The	net	operating	loss	carryovers	are	available	to	reduce	future	federal,	state	and	foreign	taxable	earnings.	At	December	31,	2009,	these	net	operating	loss	carryovers	generally	expire	within	a	period	of	1	to	20	years.	Valuation allowances	for	net	operating	loss	carryovers	have	been	established	in	the	amount	of	$13.2	million	and	$18.9	million	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.	The	tax	credit	carryovers	are	available	to	offset	future	federal,	state	and foreign	tax	liabilities.	At	December	31,	2009,	these	tax	credit	carryovers	generally	expire	within	a	period	of	1	to	15	years.	We	have	established	valuation	allowances	for	certain	tax	credit	carryovers	in	the	amount	of	$17.9	million	and $12.9	million	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.	The	remaining	valuation	allowances	of	$6.2	million	and	$5.3	million	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively,	relate	primarily	to	potential	capital	losses.	We	have	established valuation	allowances	related	to	certain	business	combination	transactions	through	goodwill.	These	allowances	were	approximately	$14.5	million	and	$19.3	million	at	December	31,	2009	and	2008,	respectively.

At	December	31,	2009,	we	had	an	aggregate	of	approximately	$1,835	million	of	unremitted	earnings	of	foreign	subsidiaries	that	have	been,	or	are	intended	to	be,	indefinitely	reinvested	for	continued	use	in	foreign	operations.	If	the total	undistributed	earnings	of	foreign	subsidiaries	were	remitted,	a	significant	amount	of	the	additional	tax	would	be	offset	by	the	allowable	foreign	tax	credits.	It	is	not	practical	for	us	to	determine	the	additional	tax	of	remitting	these earnings.

The	following	is	a	tabular	reconciliation	of	the	total	amounts	of	unrecognized	tax	benefits	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Balance\tat\tJanuary\t1 | $129.5 | $135.2 | $95.7 |
| Increases\trelated\tto\tprior\tperiods | 32.9 | 12.1 | 27.4 |
| Decreases\trelated\tto\tprior\tperiods | (26.7) | (32.0) | (5.5) |
| Increases\trelated\tto\tcurrent\tperiod | 17.4 | 15.8 | 21.9 |
| Decreases\trelated\tto\tsettlements\twith\ttaxing\tauthorities | (1.1) | (1.3) | (1.3) |
| Decreases\trelated\tto\tlapse\tof\tstatute\tof\tlimitations | (1.6) | (0.3) | (3.0) |
| Balance\tat\tDecember\t31 | $150.4 | $129.5 | $135.2 |

Included	in	the	balance	of	unrecognized	tax	benefits	at	December	31,	2009	are	$100.4	million	of	tax	benefits	that,	if	recognized,	would	affect	the	effective	tax	rate.

We	recognize	accrued	interest	and	penalties	related	to	unrecognized	tax	benefits	as	income	tax	expense	and	accrued	interest	and	penalties	of	$5.7	million	during	2009,	and	as	of	December	31,	2009,	had	recognized	a	liability	for interest	and	penalties	of	$28.6	million.	During	2008,	we	accrued	interest	and	penalties	of	$3.3	million,	and	as	of	December	31,	2008,	had	recognized	a	liability	for	interest	and	penalties	of	$22.9	million.	During	2007,	we	accrued	interest	and penalties	of	$10.0	million,	and	as	of	December	31,	2007,	had	recognized	a	liability	for	interest	and	penalties	of	$19.6	million.

We	expect	that	the	net	amount	of	tax	liability	for	unrecognized	tax	benefits	will	change	in	the	next	twelve	months.	We	are	currently	under	audit	in	numerous	federal,	state	and	foreign	jurisdictions.	While	it	is	possible	that	such	matters will	be	resolved	in	the	next	twelve	months,	we	cannot	reasonably	estimate	the	amount	or	the	periods	in	which	changes	in	the	unrecognized	tax	benefits	will	occur.

During	the	third	quarter	of	2009,	we	settled	various	tax	matters	with	the	IRS	for	all	years	prior	to	2005.	Our	U.S.	federal	returns	for	years	2005	through	2007	are	currently	under	IRS	examination.

State	income	tax	returns	are	generally	subject	to	examination	for	a	period	of	3	to	5	years	after	filing	of	the	respective	return.	The	state	impact	of	any	federal	changes	generally	remains	subject	to	examination	by	various	states	for	a period	of	up	to	one	year	after	formal	notification	to	the	states.	We	have	various	state	income	tax	returns	in	the	process	of	examination,	administrative	appeals	or	litigation.

Our	tax	returns	are	currently	under	examination	in	various	foreign	jurisdictions.	Foreign	jurisdictions	have	statutes	of	limitations	generally	ranging	from	3	to	5	years.	Years	still	open	to	examination	by	foreign	tax	authorities	in	major jurisdictions	include:	Australia	(2004	onward),	Canada	(2003	onward),	France	(2007	onward),	Germany	(2005	onward),	Italy	(2005	onward),	Japan	(2003	onward),	Korea	(2004	onward),	Puerto	Rico	(2005	onward),	Singapore	(2003 onward),	Switzerland	(2006	onward)	and	the	United	Kingdom	(2008	onward).

# 14. CAPITAL	STOCK	AND	EARNINGS	PER	SHARE

We	are	authorized	to	issue	250	million	shares	of	preferred	stock,	none	of	which	were	issued	or	outstanding	as	of	December	31,	2009.

The	numerator	for	both	basic	and	diluted	earnings	per	share	is	net	earnings	available	to	common	stockholders.	The	denominator	for	basic	earnings	per	share	is	the	weighted	average	number	of	common	shares	outstanding	during	the period.	The	denominator	for	diluted	earnings	per	share	is	weighted	average	shares	outstanding	adjusted	for	the	effect	of	dilutive	stock	options	and	other	equity	awards.	The	following	is	a	reconciliation	of	weighted	average	shares	for	the basic	and	diluted	share	computations	for	the	years	ending	December	31	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Weighted\taverage\tshares\toutstanding\tfor\tbasic\tnet\tearnings\tper\tshare | 215.0 | 227.3 | 235.5 |
| Effect\tof\tdilutive\tstock\toptions\tand\tother\tequity\tawards | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Weighted\taverage\tshares\toutstanding\tfor\tdiluted\tnet\tearnings\tper\tshare | 215.8 | 228.3 | 237.5 |

For	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	an	average	of	14.3	million	options	to	purchase	shares	of	common	stock	were	not	included	in	the	computation	of	diluted	earnings	per	share	as	the	exercise	prices	of	these	options	were	greater than	the	average	market	price	of	the	common	stock.	For	the	years	ended	December	31,	2008	and	2007,	an	average	of	11.2	million	and	3.1	million	options,	respectively,	were	not	included.

During	2009,	we	repurchased	approximately	19.8	million	shares	of	our	common	stock	at	an	average	price	of	$46.56	per	share	for	a	total	cash	outlay	of	$923.7	million,	including	commissions.	In	April	2008,	we	announced	that	our Board	of	Directors	authorized	a	$1.25	billion	share	repurchase	program	which	was	originally	set	to	expire	on	December	31,	2009.	In	September	2009,	the	Board	of	Directors	extended	this	program	to	December	31,	2010.	Approximately $211.1	million	remains	authorized	for	future	repurchases	under	this	plan.

# 15. SEGMENT	DATA

We	design,	develop,	manufacture	and	market	orthopaedic	reconstructive	implants,	dental	implants,	spinal	implants,	trauma	products	and	related	surgical	products	which	include	surgical	supplies	and	instruments	designed	to	aid	in surgical	procedures	and	post-operation	rehabilitation.	We	also	provide	other	healthcare-related	services.	Revenue	related	to	these	services	currently	represents	less	than	1	percent	of	our	total	net	sales.	We	manage	operations	through	three major	geographic	segments	–	the	Americas,	which	is	comprised	principally	of	the	United	States	and	includes	other	North,	Central	and	South	American	markets;	Europe,	which	is	comprised	principally	of	Europe	and	includes	the	Middle	East and	Africa;	and	Asia	Pacific,	which	is	comprised	primarily	of	Japan	and	includes	other	Asian	and	Pacific	markets.	This	structure	is	the	basis	for	our	reportable	segment	information	discussed	below.	Management	evaluates	reportable segment	performance	based	upon	segment	operating	profit	exclusive	of	operating	expenses	pertaining	to	global	operations	and	corporate	expenses,	share-based	compensation	expense,	settlement,	certain	claims,	acquisition,	integration, realignment	and	other	expenses,	net	curtailment	and	settlement,	inventory	step-up,	in-process	research	and	development	write-offs	and	intangible	asset	amortization	expense.	Global	operations	include	research,	development	engineering, medical	education,	brand	management,	corporate	legal,	finance,	and	human	resource	functions	and	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico-based	manufacturing	operations	and	logistics.	Intercompany	transactions	have	been	eliminated	from	segment	operating profit.	Management	reviews	accounts	receivable,	inventory,	property,	plant	and	equipment,	goodwill	and	intangible	assets	by	reportable	segment	exclusive	of	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico-based	manufacturing	operations	and	logistics	and	corporate assets.

Net	sales,	segment	operating	profit	and	year-end	assets	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | Net	Sales | Net	Sales | Net	Sales | Operating	Profit | Operating	Profit | Operating	Profit | Year-End	Assets |  |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 |
| Americas | $2,372.4 | $2,353.9 | $2,277.0 | $1,168.7 | $1,209.4 | $1,184.2 | $3,022.4 | $2,845.6 |
| Europe | 1,119.2 | 1,179.1 | 1,081.0 | 436.8 | 470.2 | 429.6 | 2,273.6 | 2,200.0 |
| Asia\tPacific | 603.8 | 588.1 | 539.5 | 257.4 | 257.1 | 259.5 | 443.6 | 395.1 |
| Net\tsales | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | $3,897.5 |  |  |  |  |  |
| Share-based\tpayment\texpense |  |  |  | (73.8) | (69.9) | (70.1) |  |  |
| Inventory\tstep-up |  |  |  | (12.5) | (7.0) | (0.5) |  |  |
| Settlement |  |  |  | – | – | (169.5) |  |  |
| Certain\tclaims |  |  |  | (35.0) | (69.0) | – |  |  |
| Goodwill\timpairment |  |  |  | (73.0) | – | – |  |  |
| Acquisition,\tintegration, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| realignment\tand\tother |  |  |  | (75.3) | (68.5) | (25.2) |  |  |
| Net\tcurtailment\tand\tsettlement |  |  |  | 32.1 | – | – |  |  |
| Global\toperations\tand |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| corporate\tfunctions |  |  |  | (606.6) | (632.3) | (480.4) | 2,045.9 | 1,798.3 |
| Operating\tprofit |  |  |  | $1,018.8 | $1,090.0 | $1,127.6 |  |  |
| Total\tassets |  |  |  |  |  |  | $7,785.5 | $7,239.0 |

U.S.	sales	were	$2,237.5	million,	$2,212.3	million	and	$2,142.2	million	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007,	respectively.	Sales	within	any	other	individual	country	were	less	than	10	percent	of	our	consolidated sales.	Sales	are	attributable	to	a	country	based	upon	the	customer's	country	of	domicile.

Beginning	in	2009,	we	no	longer	include	our	Dental	product	category	sales	within	our	Reconstructive	products	category.	Prior	year	amounts	related	to	Dental	product	category	sales	have	been	reclassified	to	conform	to	the	current year	presentation.

Net	sales	by	product	category	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Reconstructive |  |  |  |
| Knees | $1,760.6 | $1,763.1 | $1,634.6 |
| Hips | 1,228.5 | 1,279.4 | 1,221.4 |
| Extremities | 135.6 | 121.0 | 104.0 |
| Total | 3,124.7 | 3,163.5 | 2,960.0 |
| Dental | 204.7 | 227.5 | 221.0 |
| Trauma | 234.8 | 222.3 | 205.8 |
| Spine | 253.6 | 229.7 | 197.0 |
| OSP\tand\tother | 277.6 | 278.1 | 313.7 |
| Total | $4,095.4 | $4,121.1 | $3,897.5 |

Long-lived	tangible	assets	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008	are	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Americas | $851.0 | $918.3 |
| Europe | 285.0 | 272.5 |
| Asia\tPacific | 85.7 | 73.3 |
| Total | $1,221.7 | $1,264.1 |

The	Americas	long-lived	tangible	assets	are	located	primarily	in	the	U.S.	Approximately	$232.9	million	of	Europe	long-lived	tangible	assets	as	of	December	31,	2009	are	located	in	Switzerland.

Capital	expenditures	by	reportable	segment	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	were	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Americas |  |  |  |
| Additions\tto\tother\tproperty,\tplant\tand\tequipment | $0.6 | $1.5 | $0.7 |
| Europe |  |  |  |
| Additions\tto\tinstruments | 17.0 | 25.3 | 25.4 |
| Additions\tto\tother\tproperty,\tplant\tand\tequipment | 28.8 | 59.6 | 24.6 |
| Asia\tPacific |  |  |  |
| Additions\tto\tinstruments | 5.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Additions\tto\tother\tproperty,\tplant\tand\tequipment | 5.1 | 9.4 | 2.4 |
| Global\toperations\tand\tcorporate\tfunctions |  |  |  |
| Additions\tto\tinstruments | 101.4 | 210.4 | 111.9 |
| Additions\tto\tother\tproperty,\tplant\tand\tequipment | 70.6 | 179.5 | 165.0 |

For	segment	reporting	purposes,	deployed	instruments	are	included	in	the	measurement	of	reportable	segment	assets	while	undeployed	instruments	at	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico-based	manufacturing	operations	and	logistics	are	included	in global	operations	and	corporate	functions.	The	majority	of	instruments	are	purchased	by	U.S.	and	Puerto	Rico-based	manufacturing	operations	and	logistics	and	are	deployed	to	the	reportable	segments	as	needed	for	the	business.

Depreciation	and	amortization	included	in	reportable	segment	profit	for	the	years	ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007	was	as	follows	(in	millions):

|  | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Americas | $86.4 | $78.5 | $66.9 |
| Europe | 64.8 | 57.0 | 60.7 |
| Asia\tPacific | 26.7 | 25.6 | 22.7 |
| Global\toperations\tand\tcorporate\tfunctions | 159.5 | 114.0 | 79.7 |
|  | $337.4 | $275.1 | $230.0 |

# 17. COMMITMENTS	AND	CONTINGENCIES

# Intellectual	Property	and	Product	Liability-Related	Litigation

In	July	2008,	we	temporarily	suspended	marketing	and	distribution	of	the	Durom®	Acetabular	Component	(Durom	Cup)	in	the	U.S.	Following	our	announcement,	product	liability	lawsuits	and	other	claims	have	been	asserted	against us,	some	of	which	we	have	settled.	There	are	a	number	of	claims	still	pending,	and	additional	claims	may	be	submitted.	We	recorded	a	provision	of	$69.0	million	in	2008,	representing	management's	estimate	of	these	Durom	Cup-related claims.	In	the	third	quarter	of	2009,	based	on	claims	information	we	received	after	we	made	our	initial	estimate,	we	increased	our	estimate	of	the	number	of	claims	we	may	receive	and	increased	the	provision	by	$35.0	million.	The	current reserve	is	$71.9	million	as	of	December	31,	2009.	We	expect	to	pay	the	majority	of	these	claims	within	the	next	three	years.	The	provision	is	limited	to	revisions	within	two	years	of	an	original	surgery	that	occurred	prior	to	July	2008.	Any claims	received	outside	of	these	defined	parameters	will	be	managed	in	the	normal	course	and	reflected	in	our	standard	product	liability	accruals.

On	February	15,	2005,	Howmedica	Osteonics	Corp.	filed	an	action	against	us	and	an	unrelated	party	in	the	United	States	District	Court	for	the	District	of	New	Jersey	alleging	infringement	of	U.S.	Patent	Nos.	6,174,934;	6,372,814; 6,664,308;	and	6,818,020.	On	June	13,	2007,	the	Court	granted	our	motion	for	summary	judgment	on	the	invalidity	of	the	asserted	claims	of	U.S.	Patent	Nos.	6,174,934;	6,372,814;	and	6,664,308	by	ruling	that	all	of	the	asserted	claims	are invalid	for	indefiniteness.	On	August	19,	2008,	the	Court	granted	our	motion	for	summary	judgment	of	non-infringement	of	certain	claims	of	U.S.	Patent	No.	6,818,020,	reducing	the	number	of	claims	at	issue	in	the	suit	to	five.	On	April	9, 2009,	in	response	to	our	earlier	petition,	the	U.S.	Patent	and	Trademark	Office	instituted	re-examination	proceedings	against	U.S.	Patent	No.	6,818,020.	The	U.S.	Patent	and	Trademark	Office	rejected	all	previously	issued	claims	of U.S.	Patent	No.	6,818,020	as	being	unpatentable	in	light	of	one	or	more	prior	art	references.	On	September	30,	2009,	the	Court	issued	an	order	staying	proceedings	in	the	litigation	pending	the	outcome	of	the	re-examination	process. Subsequent	to	that	stay	order,	Howmedica	filed	a	motion	seeking	to	certify	an	appeal	of	the	summary	judgment	ruling	on	the	'934,	'814	and	'308	patents.	That	motion	was	granted	on	January	13,	2010.	We	expect	that	the	U.S.	Court	of Appeals	for	the	Federal	Circuit	will	hear	the	appeal	of	that	ruling	in	2010.	We	continue	to	believe	that	our	defenses	against	infringement	are	valid	and	meritorious,	and	we	intend	to	continue	to	defend	this	lawsuit	vigorously.

In	addition	to	certain	claims	related	to	the	Durom	Cup	within	the	parameters	discussed	above,	we	are	also	subject	to	product	liability	and	other	claims	and	lawsuits	arising	in	the	ordinary	course	of	business,	for	which	we	maintain insurance,	subject	to	self-insured	retention	limits.	We	establish	accruals	for	product	liability	and	other	claims	in	conjunction	with	outside	counsel	based	on	current	information	and	historical	settlement	information	for	open	claims,	related legal	fees	and	claims	incurred	but	not	reported.	While	it	is	not	possible	to	predict	with	certainty	the	outcome	of	these	cases,	it	is	the	opinion	of	management	that,	upon	ultimate	resolution,	liabilities	from	these	cases	in	excess	of	those recorded,	if	any,	will	not	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our	consolidated	financial	position,	results	of	operations	or	cash	flows.

# Government	Investigations

In	September	2007,	we	and	other	orthopaedic	companies	settled	a	U.S.	government	investigation	pertaining	to	consulting	contracts,	professional	services	agreements	and	other	agreements	by	which	remuneration	is	provided	to orthopaedic	surgeons.	As	part	of	the	settlement,	we	entered	into	a	Corporate	Integrity	Agreement	(CIA)	with	the	Office	of	Inspector	General	of	the	Department	of	Health	and	Human	Services	(OIG-HHS).	Under	the	CIA,	which	has	a	term expiring	in	2012,	we	agreed,	among	other	provisions,	to	continue	the	operation	of	our	enhanced	Corporate	Compliance	Program,	designed	to	promote	compliance	with	federal	healthcare	program	requirements,	in	accordance	with	the	terms set	forth	in	the	CIA.	We	also	agreed	to	retain	an	independent	review	organization	to	perform	annual	reviews	to	assist	us	in	assessing	our	compliance	with	the	obligations	set	forth	in	the	CIA	to	ensure	that	arrangements	we	enter	into	do	not violate	the	Anti-Kickback	Statute	(42	U.S.C.	§	1320a-7b).	A	material	breach	of	the	CIA	may	subject	us	to	exclusion	by	OIG-HHS	from	participation	in	all	federal	healthcare	programs,	which	would	have	a	material	adverse	effect	on	our financial	position,	results	of	operations	and	cash	flows.

In	November	2007,	we	received	a	civil	investigative	demand	from	the	Massachusetts	Attorney	General's	office

seeking	additional	information	regarding	our	financial	relationships	with	a	number	of	Massachusetts	healthcare	providers.	We	received	a	similar	inquiry	from	the	Oregon	Attorney	General's	office	in	October	2008.	We	are	cooperating	fully with	the	investigators	with	regard	to	these	matters.

In	September	2007,	the	Staff	of	the	U.S.	Securities	and	Exchange	Commission	(SEC)	informed	us	that	it	was	conducting	an	investigation	regarding	potential	violations	of	the	Foreign	Corrupt	Practices	Act	(FCPA)	in	the	sale	of medical	devices	in	a	number	of	foreign	countries	by	companies	in	the	medical	device	industry.	In	November	2007,	we	received	a	letter	from	the	U.S.	Department	of	Justice	(DOJ)	requesting	that	any	information	provided	to	the	SEC	also	be provided	to	the	DOJ	on	a	voluntary	basis.	We	are	continuing	to	provide	information	and	cooperate	fully	with	the	SEC	and	the	DOJ	with	regard	to	this	pending	investigation.	In	addition,	as	part	of	our	global	compliance	program,	we	have been	conducting	our	own	proactive	reviews	regarding	FCPA	compliance	in	jurisdictions	that	have	not	been	involved	in	the	pending	investigation.	These	reviews	have	yielded	information	indicating	that	certain	third-party,	independent distributors	of	our	products	in	two	South	American	countries	made	certain	payments	that	may	have	potential	FCPA	implications.	In	the	course	of	continuing	dialogues	with	the	agencies,	we	voluntarily	disclosed	information	relating	to	these matters	to	the	SEC	and	the	DOJ,	and	the	reviews	are	ongoing.	We	cannot	currently	predict	the	outcome	of	the	investigation	or	the	impact	of	our	voluntary	disclosures	to	the	authorities.

# Putative	Class	Actions

On	August	5,	2008,	a	complaint	was	filed	in	the	U.S.	District	Court	for	the	Southern	District	of	Indiana,	Plumbers	and	Pipefitters	Local	Union	719	Pension	Fund	v.	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.,	et	al.,	naming	us	and	two	of	our	executive officers	as	defendants.	The	complaint	related	to	a	putative	class	action	on	behalf	of	persons	who	purchased	our	common	stock	between	January	29,	2008	and	July	22,	2008.	The	complaint	alleged	that	the	defendants	violated	the	federal securities	law	by	allegedly	failing	to	disclose	developments	relating	to	our	orthopaedic	surgical	products	manufacturing	operations	in	Dover,	Ohio	and	the	Durom	Cup.	The	plaintiff	sought	unspecified	damages	and	interest,	attorneys'	fees, costs	and	other	relief.	On	December	24,	2008,	the	lead	plaintiff	filed	a	consolidated	complaint	that	alleged	the	same	claims	and	related	to	the	same	time	period.	The	defendants	filed	a	motion	to	dismiss	the	consolidated	complaint	on February	23,	2009.	On	December	1,	2009,	the	Court	granted	defendants'	motion	to	dismiss,	without	prejudice.	On	January	15,	2010,	the	plaintiff	filed	a	motion	for	leave	to	amend	the	consolidated	complaint.	That	motion	is	pending.	We believe	this	lawsuit	is	without	merit,	and	we	and	the	individual	defendants	intend	to	defend	it	vigorously.

On	November	20,	2008,	a	complaint	was	filed	in	the	U.S.	District	Court	for	the	Northern	District	of	Indiana,	Dewald	v.	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.,	et	al.,	naming	us	and	certain	of	our	current	and	former	directors	and	employees	as defendants.	The	complaint	relates	to	a	putative	class	action	on	behalf	of	all	persons	who	were	participants	in	or	beneficiaries	of	our	U.S.	or	Puerto	Rico	Savings	and	Investment	Programs	(plans)	between	October	5,	2007	and	the	date	of	filing and	whose	accounts	included	investments	in	our	common	stock.	The	complaint	alleges,	among	other	things,	that	the	defendants	breached	their	fiduciary	duties	in	violation	of	the	Employee	Retirement	Income	Security	Act	of	1974,	as amended,	by	continuing	to	offer	Zimmer	stock	as	an	investment	option	in	the	plans	when	the	stock	purportedly	was	no	longer	a	prudent	investment	and	that	defendants	failed	to	provide	plan	participants	with	complete	and	accurate information	sufficient	to	advise	them	of	the	risks	of	investing	their	retirement	savings	in	Zimmer	stock.	The	plaintiff	seeks	an	unspecified	monetary	payment	to	the	plans,	injunctive	and	equitable	relief,	attorneys'	fees,	costs	and	other	relief. On	January	23,	2009,	the	plaintiff	filed	an	amended	complaint	that	alleges	the	same	claims	and	clarifies	that	the	class	period	is	October	5,	2007	through	September	2,	2008.	The	defendants	filed	a	motion	to	dismiss	the	amended	complaint	on March	23,	2009.	The	motion	to	dismiss	is	pending	with	the	court.	On	June	12,	2009,	the	U.S.	Judicial	Panel	on	Multidistrict	Litigation	entered	an	order	transferring	the	Dewald	case	to	the	U.S.	District	Court	for	the	Southern	District	of Indiana	for	coordinated	or	consolidated	pretrial	proceedings	with	the	Plumbers	&	Pipefitters	Local	Union	719	Pension	Fund	case	referenced	above.	We	believe	this	lawsuit	is	without	merit,	and	we	and	the	individual	defendants	intend	to defend	it	vigorously.

# 18. QUARTERLY	FINANCIAL	INFORMATION	(UNAUDITED)

(in	millions,	except	per	share	data)

|  | 2009	Quarter	Ended | 2009	Quarter	Ended | 2009	Quarter	Ended | 2009	Quarter	Ended | 2008	Quarter	Ended | 2008	Quarter	Ended | 2008	Quarter	Ended | 2008	Quarter	Ended |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|  | Mar | Jun | Sep | Dec | Mar | Jun | Sep | Dec |
| Net\tsales | $992.6 | $1,019.9 | $975.6 | $1,107.3 | $1,059.2 | $1,079.5 | $952.2 | $1,030.2 |
| Gross\tprofit | 762.3 | 783.1 | 726.3 | 832.9 | 804.5 | 817.2 | 715.0 | 787.1 |
| Net\tearnings\tof\tZimmer\tHoldings,\tInc. | 202.2 | 210.1 | 149.9 | 155.2 | 239.3 | 227.1 | 214.7 | 167.5 |
| Earnings\tper\tcommon\tshare |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Basic | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.75 |
| Diluted | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.75 |

We	have	established	disclosure	controls	and	procedures	and	internal	controls	over	financial	reporting	to	provide	reasonable	assurance	that	material	information	relating	to	us,	including	our	consolidated	subsidiaries,	is	made	known	on a	timely	basis	to	management	and	the	Board	of	Directors.	However,	no	control	system,	no	matter	how	well	designed	and	operated,	can	provide	absolute	assurance	that	the	objectives	of	the	control	system	are	met,	and	no	evaluation	of controls	can	provide	absolute	assurance	that	all	control	issues	and	instances	of	fraud,	if	any,	within	a	company	have	been	detected.

Our	management,	with	the	participation	of	our	Chief	Executive	Officer	and	Chief	Financial	Officer,	evaluated	the	effectiveness	of	the	design	and	operation	of	our	disclosure	controls	and	procedures	(as	defined	in	Rule	13a-15(e)	of the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934).	Based	upon	that	evaluation,	our	Chief	Executive	Officer	and	Chief	Financial	Officer	concluded	that	our	disclosure	controls	and	procedures	as	of	the	end	of	the	period	covered	by	this	report	are effective.

There	was	no	change	in	our	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	(as	defined	in	Rule	13a-15(f)	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934)	that	occurred	during	the	quarter	ended	December	31,	2009	that	has	materially	affected,	or	is reasonably	likely	to	materially	affect,	our	internal	control	over	financial	reporting.	Management's	report	on	internal	control	over	financial	reporting	appears	in	this	report	at	the	conclusion	of	Part	II,	Item	7A.

During	the	fourth	quarter	of	2009,	the	Audit	Committee	of	the	Board	of	Directors	was	not	asked	to	and	did	not	approve	the	engagement	of	PricewaterhouseCoopers	LLP,	our	independent	registered	public	accounting	firm,	to	perform any	non-audit	services.	This	disclosure	is	made	pursuant	to	Section	10A(i)(2)	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934,	as	added	by	Section	202	of	the	Sarbanes-Oxley	Act	of	2002.

The	information	required	by	this	Item	concerning	our	directors	and	executive	officers	is	incorporated	herein	by	reference	from	our	definitive	Proxy	Statement	for	our	2010	Annual	Meeting	of	Stockholders	which	will	be	filed	with	the Commission	pursuant	to	Regulation	14A	within	120	days	after	the	end	of	our	most	recent	fiscal	year	and	the	information	included	under	the	caption	"Executive	Officers"	in	Part	I	of	this	report.

The	information	required	by	this	Item	concerning	remuneration	of	our	officers	and	directors	and	information	concerning	material	transactions	involving	such	officers	and	directors	is	incorporated	herein	by	reference	from	our definitive	Proxy	Statement	for	our	2010	Annual	Meeting	of	Stockholders	which	will	be	filed	with	the	Commission	pursuant	to	Regulation	14A	within	120	days	after	the	end	of	our	most	recent	fiscal	year. ITEM	12. Security	Ownership	of	Certain	Beneficial	Owners	and	Management	and	Related	Stockholder	Matters

The	information	required	by	this	Item	concerning	the	stock	ownership	of	management	and	five	percent	beneficial	owners	and	related	stockholder	matters,	including	equity	compensation	plan	information,	is	incorporated	herein	by reference	from	our	definitive	Proxy	Statement	for	our	2010	Annual	Meeting	of	Stockholders	which	will	be	filed	with	the	Commission	pursuant	to	Regulation	14A	within	120	days	after	the	end	of	our	most	recent	fiscal	year.

# ITEM	13. Certain	Relationships	and	Related	Transactions	and	Director	Independence

The	information	required	by	this	Item	concerning	certain	relationships	and	related	transactions	and	director	independence	is	incorporated	herein	by	reference	from	our	definitive	Proxy	Statement	for	our	2010	Annual	Meeting	of Stockholders	which	will	be	filed	with	the	Commission	pursuant	to	Regulation	14A	within	120	days	after	the	end	of	our	most	recent	fiscal	year.

# ITEM	14. Principal	Accounting	Fees	and	Services

The	information	required	by	this	Item	concerning	principal	accounting	fees	and	services	is	incorporated	herein	by	reference	from	our	definitive	Proxy	Statement	for	our	2010	Annual	Meeting	of	Stockholders	which	will	be	filed	with the	Commission	pursuant	to	Regulation	14A	within	120	days	after	the	end	of	our	most	recent	fiscal	year.

# Exhibits,	Financial	Statement	Schedules

# (a)	1.	Financial	Statements

The	following	consolidated	financial	statements	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	its	subsidiaries	are	set	forth	in	Part	II,	Item	8.

Consolidated	Statements	of	Earnings	for	the	Years	Ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007

Consolidated	Balance	Sheets	as	of	December	31,	2009	and	2008

Consolidated	Statements	of	Stockholders'	Equity	for	the	Years	Ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007 Consolidated	Statements	of	Cash	Flows	for	the	Years	Ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007 Consolidated	Statements	of	Comprehensive	Income	for	the	Years	Ended	December	31,	2009,	2008	and	2007 Notes	to	Consolidated	Financial	Statements

2.	Financial	Statement	Schedules

Schedule	II.		Valuation	and	Qualifying	Accounts

Other	financial	statement	schedules	are	omitted	because	they	are	not	applicable	or	the	required	information	is	shown	in	the	financial	statements	or	the	notes	thereto.

3.	Exhibits

A	list	of	exhibits	required	to	be	filed	as	part	of	this	report	is	set	forth	in	the	Index	to	Exhibits,	which	immediately	precedes	such	exhibits	and	is	incorporated	herein	by	reference.

# Signatures

Pursuant	to	the	requirements	of	Section	13	or	15(d)	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934,	the	registrant	has	duly	caused	this	report	to	be	signed	on	its	behalf	by	the	undersigned,	thereunto	duly	authorized.

President	and	Chief	Executive	Officer

Pursuant	to	the	requirements	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934,	this	report	has	been	signed	below	by	the	following	persons	on	behalf	of	the	registrant	and	in	the	capacities	and	on	the	dates	indicated.

| Signature | Title | Date |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| /s/\t\tDavid\tC.\tDvorak | President,\tChief\tExecutive\tOfficer\tand\tDirector | February\t25,\t2010 |
| David\tC.\tDvorak | (Principal\tExecutive\tOfficer) |  |
| /s/\t\tJames\tT.\tCrines | Executive\tVice\tPresident,\tFinance | February\t25,\t2010 |
| James\tT.\tCrines | and\tChief\tFinancial\tOfficer |  |
|  | (Principal\tFinancial\tOfficer) |  |
| /s/\t\tDerek\tM.\tDavis | Vice\tPresident,\tFinance,\tand\tCorporate\tController | February\t25,\t2010 |
| Derek\tM.\tDavis | and\tChief\tAccounting\tOfficer |  |
|  | (Principal\tAccounting\tOfficer) |  |
| /s/\t\tBetsy\tJ.\tBernard\nBetsy\tJ.\tBernard | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |
| /s/\t\tMarc\tN.\tCasper\nMarc\tN.\tCasper | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |
| /s/\t\tLarry\tC.\tGlasscock\nLarry\tC.\tGlasscock | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |
| /s/\t\tRobert\tA.\tHagemann\nRobert\tA.\tHagemann | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |
| /s/\t\tArthur\tJ.\tHiggins\nArthur\tJ.\tHiggins | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |
| /s/\t\tJohn\tL.\tMcGoldrick\nJohn\tL.\tMcGoldrick | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |
| /s/\t\tCecil\tB.\tPickett,\tPh.D. | Director | February\t25,\t2010 |

# Index	to	Exhibits

Exhibit	No 	 Description

	3.1 Restated	Certificate	of	Incorporation	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	dated	May	13,	2008	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	3.1	to	the	Registrant's	Quarterly	Report	on	Form	10-Q	filed	August	5,	2008)

3.2 Restated	By-Laws	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	effective	May	6,	2008	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	3.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	May	9,	2008)

4.1 Specimen	Common	Stock	certificate	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	4.3	to	the	Registrant's	Registration	Statement	on	Form	S-8	filed	January	20,	2006)

4.2 Indenture	dated	as	of	November	17,	2009	between	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	Wells	Fargo	Bank,	National	Association,	as	Trustee	(incorporated	by	reference	to	the	form	filed	as	Exhibit	4.8	to	the	Registrant's Registration	Statement	on	Form	S-3	filed	November	12,	2009)

4.3 First	Supplemental	Indenture	to	the	Indenture	dated	as	of	November	17,	2009	between	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	Wells	Fargo	Bank,	National	Association,	as	Trustee	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	4.2	to the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	November	17,	2009)

10.1* Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2001	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Appendix	B	to	the	Registrant's	definitive	Proxy	Statement	on	Schedule	14A	filed	March	24,	2003)

10.2* First	Amendment	to	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2001	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	December	15,	2005)

10.3* Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2006	Stock	Incentive	Plan,	as	amended	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	December	13,	2006)

10.4* Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Executive	Performance	Incentive	Plan,	as	amended	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Appendix	B	to	the	Registrant's	definitive	Proxy	Statement	on	Schedule	14A	filed	March	20,	2008)

10.5* Restated	Zimmer,	Inc.	Long-Term	Disability	Income	Plan	for	Highly	Compensated	Employees	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.9	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	28,	2007)

10.6* Change	in	Control	Severance	Agreement	with	David	C.	Dvorak	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.10	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	27,	2009)

10.7* Form	of	Change	in	Control	Severance	Agreement	with	Bruno	A.	Melzi	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.3	to	the	Registrant's	Quarterly	Report	on	Form	10-Q	filed	May	8,	2002)

10.8* Form	of	Change	in	Control	Severance	Agreement	with	James	T.	Crines	and	Cheryl	R.	Blanchard	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.12	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	27, 2009)

10.9* Form	of	Change	in	Control	Severance	Agreement	with	Jeffery	A.	McCaulley	and	Chad	F.	Phipps	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.13	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	27, 2009)

10.10* Change	in	Control	Severance	Agreement	with	Derek	M.	Davis	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.14	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	27,	2009)

10.11* Change	in	Control	Severance	Agreement	with	Stephen	Hong	Liang,	Ooi	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.21	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	March	12,	2003)

10.12* Restated	Benefit	Equalization	Plan	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	Its	Subsidiary	or	Affiliated	Corporations	Participating	in	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Savings	and	Investment	Program	(incorporated	by	reference	to Exhibit	10.16	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	27,	2009)

10.13* Restated	Benefit	Equalization	Plan	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	and	Its	Subsidiary	or	Affiliated	Corporations	Participating	in	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Retirement	Income	Plan	or	the	Zimmer	Puerto	Rico Retirement	Income	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.17	to	the	Registrant's	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	filed	February	27,	2009)

10.14* Form	of	Confidentiality,	Non-Competition	and	Non-Solicitation	Employment	Agreement	with	U.S.-Based	Executive	Officers	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Quarterly	Report	on Form	10-Q	filed	August	7,	2009)

10.15* Non-Disclosure,	Non-Competition	and	Non-Solicitation	Employment	Agreement	with	Stephen	Hong	Liang,	Ooi	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.2	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed March	27,	2006)

10.16* Confidentiality,	Non-Competition	and	Non-Solicitation	Agreement	with	Bruno	A.	Melzi	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.3	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	March	27,	2006)

# Index	to	Exhibits	(Continued)

10.17* Form	of	Nonqualified	Stock	Option	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2001	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.3	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed January	11,	2006)

10.18* Form	of	Nonqualified	Performance-Conditioned	Stock	Option	Grant	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2001	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	January	21,	2005)

10.19* Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Stock	Plan	for	Non-Employee	Directors,	as	amended	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Appendix	C	to	the	Registrant's	Definitive	Proxy	Statement	filed	on	March	20,	2009)

10.20* Form	of	Nonqualified	Stock	Option	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Stock	Plan	for	Non-Employee	Directors	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.2	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8- K	filed	April	5,	2005)

10.21* Form	of	Restricted	Stock	Unit	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Stock	Plan	for	Non-Employee	Directors	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K filed	February	21,	2006)

10.22* Form	of	Nonqualified	Stock	Option	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2006	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.2	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed December	13,	2006)

10.23* Form	of	Nonqualified	Stock	Option	Award	Letter	for	Non-U.S.	Employees	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2006	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.3	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report on	Form	8-K	filed	December	13,	2006)

10.24* Form	of	Restricted	Stock	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2006	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(five-year	vesting)	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.4	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K filed	December	13,	2006)

10.25* Form	of	Performance-Based	Restricted	Stock	Unit	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2006	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form 8-K	filed	February	17,	2009)

10.26* Restated	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	Deferred	Compensation	Plan	for	Non-Employee	Directors	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Appendix	D	to	the	Registrant's	Definitive	Proxy	Statement	filed	on	March	20,	2009)

10.27* Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Appendix	B	to	the	Registrant's	Definitive	Proxy	Statement	filed	on	March	20,	2009)

10.28* Form	of	Nonqualified	Stock	Option	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan

10.29* Form	of	Nonqualified	Stock	Option	Award	Letter	for	Non-U.S.	Employees	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan

10.30* Form	of	Performance-Based	Restricted	Stock	Unit	Award	Letter	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan

10.31* Form	of	Performance-Based	Restricted	Stock	Unit	Award	Letter	for	Non-U.S.	Employees	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan

10.32* Form	of	Restricted	Stock	Unit	Award	Letter	(five-year	vesting)	under	the	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.	2009	Stock	Incentive	Plan

10.33* Summary	Compensation	Sheet

10.35 Corporate	Integrity	Agreement	dated	September	27,	2007,	among	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.,	Zimmer,	Inc.	and	the	Office	of	Inspector	General	of	the	Department	of	Health	and	Human	Services	(incorporated	by reference	to	Exhibit	10.2	to	the	Registrant's	Quarterly	Report	on	Form	10-Q	filed	November	9,	2007)

10.36 Form	of	Indemnification	Agreement	with	Non-Employee	Directors	and	Officers	(incorporated	by	reference	to	Exhibit	10.1	to	the	Registrant's	Current	Report	on	Form	8-K	filed	July	31,	2008)

21 List	of	Subsidiaries	of	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.

23 Consent	of	PricewaterhouseCoopers	LLP

31.1 Certification	pursuant	to	Rule	13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934	of	the	Chief	Executive	Officer,	as	adopted	pursuant	to	Section	302	of	the	Sarbanes-Oxley	Act	of	2002 31.2 Certification	pursuant	to	Rule	13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)	of	the	Securities	Exchange	Act	of	1934	of	the	Chief	Financial	Officer,	as	adopted	pursuant	to	Section	302	of	the	Sarbanes-Oxley	Act	of	2002

32 Certification	pursuant	to	18	U.S.C.	Section	1350,	as	adopted	pursuant	to	Section	906	of	the	Sarbanes-Oxley	Act	of	2002 101 The	following	materials	from	Zimmer	Holdings,	Inc.'s	Annual	Report	on	Form	10-K	for	the	year	ended	December	31,	2009,	formatted	in	XBRL	(Extensible	Business	Reporting	Language):	(1)	the	Consolidated Statements	of	Earnings,	(2)	the	Consolidated	Balance	Sheets,	(3)	the	Consolidated	Statements	of	Stockholders'	Equity,	(4)	the	Consolidated	Statements	of	Cash	Flows,	(5)	the	Consolidated	Statements	of Comprehensive	Income	and	(6)	Notes	to	Consolidated	Financial	Statements,	tagged	as	blocks	of	text.

* indicates	management	contracts	or	compensatory	plans	or	arrangements

| Description | Balance	at<br>Beginning<br>of	Period | Additions<br>Charged<br>(Credited)<br>to	Expense | Deductions<br>to	Reserve | Effects	of<br>Foreign<br>Currency | Acquired<br>Abbott	Spine<br>Allowances | Balance	at<br>End	of<br>Period |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Doubtful\tAccounts: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2007 | $20.4 | $1.4 | $(1.2) | $1.1 | $– | $21.7 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2008 | 21.7 | (0.5) | (1.9) | (1.2) | 1.9 | 20.0 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2009 | 20.0 | 0.1 | (1.8) | 0.5 | – | 18.8 |
| Excess\tand\tObsolete\tInventory: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2007 | $129.5 | $38.6 | $(26.9) | $2.5 | $– | $143.7 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2008 | 143.7 | 66.5 | (23.1) | (2.6) | 15.1 | 199.6 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2009 | 199.6 | 81.7 | (33.5) | 7.3 | – | 255.1 |
| Excess\tand\tObsolete\tInstruments: |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2007 | $40.7 | $3.1 | $(12.5) | $0.4 | $– | $31.7 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2008 | 31.7 | 5.6 | (2.9) | 0.3 | 2.4 | 37.1 |
| Year\tEnded\tDecember\t31,\t2009 | 37.1 | 22.7 | (6.5) | 0.5 | – | 53.8 |



Question: what was the percent change in operating leases between 2011/12 and 2013/4?
Calculation: change_2011_2013 = 26.6 - 47.6
percent_change = change_2011_2013 / 47.6
answer = percent_change * 100
Answer: -44%