Aurametrix/dermatology_longitudinal huggingface dataset:
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — pityriasis versicolor: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Pityriasis versicolor (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — tinea corporis: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — atopic eczema: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Atopic eczema (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — discoid lupus erythematosus: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — a clavus: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Clavus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — warts: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Warts (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — basal cell carcinoma: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Basal Cell Carcinoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — actinic keratosis: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — pityriasis versicolor: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Pityriasis versicolor (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — tinea corporis: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — erythrasma: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Erythrasma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — an abscess: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — chronic urticaria: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Chronic urticaria (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — shingles: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — pityriasis versicolor: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Pityriasis versicolor (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — tinea corporis: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — dermatomyositis: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Dermatomyositis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — scleroderma: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Scleroderma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — an abscess:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — discoid lupus erythematosus:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — malignant melanoma:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Melanoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — scleroderma:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Scleroderma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — warts: Additional Sources Listed
Condition/subject: Warts (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — actinic keratosis: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — basal cell carcinoma: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Basal Cell Carcinoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — actinic keratosis: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — chronic urticaria: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Chronic urticaria (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — shingles: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — an abscess: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — discoid lupus erythematosus: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — basal cell carcinoma: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Basal Cell Carcinoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — actinic keratosis: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — shingles: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — a clavus: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Clavus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — tinea corporis: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of command-xlarge-nightly (Cohere series) — dermatomyositis: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Dermatomyositis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — chronic urticaria: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Chronic urticaria (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — pyoderma gangrenosum: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Pyoderma gangrenosum (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — fungal nail infections: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Fungal nail infections (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — pityriasis versicolor: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Pityriasis versicolor (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — tinea corporis: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — an abscess:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — chronic urticaria:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Chronic urticaria (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — pyoderma gangrenosum:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Pyoderma gangrenosum (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — shingles:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — warts: Additional Sources Listed
Condition/subject: Warts (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — dermatomyositis: Additional Sources Listed
Condition/subject: Dermatomyositis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — atopic eczema: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Atopic eczema (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — discoid lupus erythematosus: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — actinic keratosis: benefits of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — fungal nail infections: Is it clearly presented that more than one possible treatment procedure may exist
Condition/subject: Fungal nail infections (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — chronic urticaria: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Chronic urticaria (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — pyoderma gangrenosum: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Pyoderma gangrenosum (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — fungal nail infections: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Fungal nail infections (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — tinea corporis: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — impetigo: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Impetigo (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — erythrasma: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Erythrasma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — dermatomyositis: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Dermatomyositis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — scleroderma: the information is an aid to "shared decision-making"
Condition/subject: Scleroderma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — a clavus: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Clavus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — pyoderma gangrenosum: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Pyoderma gangrenosum (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — shingles: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — erythrasma: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Erythrasma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — scleroderma: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Scleroderma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of gpt-3.5-turbo (GPT series) — morphea: overall quality of generated text as a source of information
Condition/subject: Morphea (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 60.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of bloomz (BLOOM series) — an abscess: NOT harmfulness
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of bloomz (BLOOM series) — shingles: NOT harmfulness
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of bloomz (BLOOM series) — shingles: NOT Falsness
Condition/subject: Shingles (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — atopic eczema: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Atopic eczema (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — psoriasis: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Psoriasis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — an abscess: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — discoid lupus erythematosus: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — warts: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Warts (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — basal cell carcinoma: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Basal Cell Carcinoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — malignant melanoma: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Melanoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — actinic keratosis: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — pityriasis versicolor: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Pityriasis versicolor (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — tinea corporis: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Tinea corporis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — impetigo: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Impetigo (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — erythrasma: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Erythrasma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — scleroderma: Objectives Clear and Achieved
Condition/subject: Scleroderma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — atopic eczema:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Atopic eczema (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — psoriasis:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Psoriasis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — discoid lupus erythematosus:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — warts:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Warts (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — basal cell carcinoma:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Basal Cell Carcinoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — malignant melanoma:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Melanoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — chronic urticaria:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Chronic urticaria (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — impetigo:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Impetigo (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — erythrasma:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Erythrasma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — scleroderma:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Scleroderma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — morphea:  information presented is balanced and unbiased
Condition/subject: Morphea (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity
Dataset: 20 dermatologic diseases out of 60 arbitrarily chosen diseases (19 ophthalmologic, 20 dermatologic, and 21 orthopedic)  - dermatology information (therapy recommendation) generated by LLM ranked by 3 specialist physicians
Reference (2023): Wilhelm TI, Roos J, Kaczmarczyk R. Large Language Models for Therapy Recommendations Across 3 Clinical Specialties: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 30;25:e49324. doi: 10.2196/49324. PMID: 37902826; PMCID: PMC10644179.

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — an abscess: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Abscess (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — discoid lupus erythematosus: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Discoid lupus erythematosus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — a clavus: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Clavus (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — warts: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Warts (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — basal cell carcinoma: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Basal Cell Carcinoma (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity

Evaluation of claude-instant-v1.0 (Claude series) — actinic keratosis: mode of action of each treatment procedure described
Condition/subject: Actinic Keratosis (English)
Category: Medication Recommendations and Treatment Efficacy — Clinical Practice
Validity/accuracy: 80.00% (sample size: 3)
Comments: Score derived from rankings of 3 specialist physicians on a scale 1 - 5, converted to percentages of accuracy/validity