Private Letter Ruling   
Number 202424012   
Internal Revenue Service   
March 12, 2024     
     
     
     
Internal Revenue Service   
Department of the Treasury   
Washington, DC 20224   
     
Number: 202424012   
Release Date: 6/14/2024   
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 1400Z.02-00     
Third Party Communication: None   
Date of Communication: Not Applicable   
Person To Contact:   
ID No.   
Telephone Number:   
Refer Reply To:   
CC:ITA:B05   
PLR-119310-23   
Date:  March 12, 2024   
     
Dear ******:     
     
This ruling responds to Taxpayer's request dated Date 1. Specifically, Taxpayer requests relief under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, granting an extension of time to make a timely election under § 1.1400Z-2(a)-1(a)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations to self-certify as a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF), as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).   
     
FACTS   
     
Taxpayer represents the facts as follows:   
     
Taxpayer is a limited liability company organized under the laws of State on Date 2. Taxpayer is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. Taxpayer uses the cash method of accounting and the calendar year as its taxable year.   
     
Taxpayer was formed for the purpose of investing in a qualified opportunity zone business and operating as a QOF as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(1) on Date 2.   
     
On Date 3, Taxpayer engaged Accounting Firm to prepare its Year 1 income tax returns and related forms. The Accounting Firm filed the Members' Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return and Form 8997, Initial and Annual Statement of Qualified Opportunity Fund Investments. The Accounting Firm also filed Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information and Other Returns, on behalf of the Taxpayer.   
     
However, due to a miscommunication, Accounting Firm did not file the Taxpayer's Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, and Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund, failing to certify the Taxpayer as a QOF for the Year 1 tax year.   
     
In Year 2, upon later review of the Year 1 tax filings, Accountant discovered that Accounting Firm had not completed and filed Taxpayer's Year 1 partnership return or Form 8996. Once it became clear that the return had not been filed, Taxpayer retained Accounting Firm 2 and began preparing the documents to submit a private letter ruling request.   
     
LAW AND ANALYSIS   
     
Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides the rules for an entity to self-certify as a QOF. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a QOF must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.   
     
To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund, with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). The information provided indicates that Taxpayer did not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its income tax return due to the Accounting Firm's failure to timely file Taxpayer's Year 1 return.   
     
Because § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to self-certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in § 301.9100-1(b).   
     
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in § 301.9100-2) will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.   
     
Under § 301.9100-3(b) a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. However, a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have known that the professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory election or was not aware of all relevant facts.   
     
In addition, § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer--   
     
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;   
     
(ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or   
     
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will not ordinarily grant relief.   
     
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.   
     
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).   
     
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.   
     
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, based solely on the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling request, we grant Taxpayer an extension of 60 days from the date of this letter ruling to file a Form 8996 for Year 1 to make the election to self-certify as a QOF under § 1400Z-2 and § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i). The election must be made on a completed Form 8996 attached to the Taxpayer's tax return for Year 1. This letter ruling grants an extension of time to file a Form 8996 for Year 1. This letter ruling does not grant an extension of time to file Taxpayer's Form 1065 for Year 1.   
     
This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual information, representations, and other data submitted.   
     
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in § 1.1400Z2 (a)-1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under § 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF.   
     
Further, we express no opinion on whether any interest owned in any entity by Taxpayer qualifies as qualified opportunity zone property, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(2), or whether such entity would be treated as a qualified opportunity zone business, as defined in § 1400Z-2(d)(3). We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.   
     
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.   
     
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.   
     
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being faxed to your authorized representative.   
     
Sincerely,   
     
Christina M. Glendening   
Senior Counsel, Branch 5   
Office of Associate Chief Counsel   
(Income Tax & Accounting)   
     
cc: