: Criminal Appeal Nos.
563 64 of 1986 From the Judgment and Order dated 30.9.85 in the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl.
M. (M) Nos.
1105 & 1106 of 1985.
M.R. Sharma and Dalveer Bhandari for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the court was delivered by MISRA, J.
Special leave granted.
We have carefully considered the various aspects of the case and we are of the view that having regard to the nature of the dispute and the fact that the offences, if any, are alleged to have been committed more than six years ago and the appellant was merely a trader at the 174 lowest rung of the hierarchy in the Foreign Exchange Divi sion of the Bank and not a highly placed officer and the trial is bound to occupy the time of the court of first instance for not less that two or three years in view of the complicated nature of the case and even then, it is extreme ly doubtful whether it will at all result in conviction, no useful purpose will be served by allowing the prosecutions to continue.
Hence, we allow the appeals and quash the charges against the appellant.
We may, however, make it clear that if the Bank has any legitimate claim against the appellant, it will be open to the Bank to pursue any civil remedies which may be available to it.
M.L.A. Appeals al lowed.

Summary:
HELD: 1.
The fact that the offences, if any, are alleged to have been committed more than six years ago and the appellant was merely a trader at the lowest rung of the hierarchy in the Foreign Exchange Division of the Bank and not a highly placed officer and the trial is bound to occupy the time of the ' court of tint instance for not less than two or three years in view of the complicated nature of the case and even then, it is extremely doubtful whether it will at all result in conviction no useful purpose will he served by allowing the prosecutions to continue.
[H 174A] However, if the Bank has any legitimate claim against the appellant, it will he open to the Bank to pursue any civil remedies which may be available to it.
[174B]