## Marine Corps Legal Support

US Marine Corps DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

PCN 143 000179 00
Headquarters United States Marine Corps Washington, D.C. 20350-3000

## Foreword

Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 11-10, *Marine Corps Legal Support*, provides the doctrinal basis for how the legal community delivers support to the Marine Corps. This publication facilitates each commander's ability to integrate the two types of legal support, command legal advice and legal services support, into the planning and execution of Marine Corps operations across the spectrum of conflict, as well as the Service's responsibilities to organize, train, and equip. MCWP 11-10 provides flexible guidance based on accumulated best practices and applies those practices across the range of legal advice and services.

Legal support is provided to the operating forces, supporting establishment, and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps by Marines with legal training who collectively comprise the Marine Corps legal community. Members of the legal community are integral to the Marine Corps by design. They provide an organic legal capability that is ready to respond when the Nation's force in readiness is called upon. MCWP 11-10 explains what the legal community does for the Marine Corps, identifies key personnel, offers an introduction to legal support functional areas, and addresses the judge advocate's role in the Marine Corps Planning Process. MCWP 11-10 is primarily concerned with providing commanders and their staffs a doctrinal reference for what the Marine Corps legal community brings to the fight. Therefore, it is important for every Marine in the legal community to understand the information contained herein. Reviewed and approved this date.

## By Direction Of The Commandant Of The Marine Corps

Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integration Publication Control Number: 143 000179 00 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Judge Advocate Division, Headquarters, United States Marine Corps ........ 4-3
Staff Judge Advocate........ 4-3 Types of Courts-Martial Convening Authorities........ 4-4 Legal Services Support Sections and Legal Services Support Teams........ 4-5
The Marine Corps Defense Services Organization........ 4-5 The Victims' Legal Counsel Organization ........ 4-5 Reserve Legal Support........ 4-6

## Chapter 5. Role Of The Judge Advocate In The Marine Corps Planning Process

Legal Advice During the Planning Process ........ 5-1 Measure of Performance and Measure of Effectiveness........ 5-2 Early Integration: Problem Framing........ 5-2
Further Integration: Achieving Accuracy and Completeness........ 5-3

## Glossary References And Related Publications To Our Readers Chapter 1 Fundamentals

"Within the Marine Corps, having Marine judge advocates serve as unrestricted line officers, expected to maintain themselves as well-rounded MAGTF officers, makes for not only a better Marine officer, but also a more effective Marine judge advocate."

## Conclusion Final Report Of The Independent Review Panel To Study The Judge Advocate Requirements Of The Department Of The Navy

During the 60-plus years since the passage of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the Marine Corps remains dedicated to two major concepts relative to legal support: the necessity for the Marine Corps legal community's unrestricted Marines to provide legal support to fellow Marines and for the Marines who provide that legal support to be organic to the units that they support, as opposed to a separate corps. These concepts are essential and originate from the Marine Corps expeditionary force character, a character that necessitates legal support inseparably intertwined with the force it helps maintain.

Note: The term "unrestricted" is used here to denote that Marines in the legal community are not restricted to a particular type of duty to which they may be assigned or a separate competitive category. Marines in the legal community provide flexibility for use in a broad span of managerial and career broadening assignments, which are necessary to meet Marine Corps requirements.

Marine Corps commanders have long recognized that good order, discipline, morale, and readiness are all command functions that share a connection with combat readiness and effectiveness.

Changes at strategic, operational, and tactical levels have dramatically increased the amount and diversity of the legal support requirements of commanders. Military operations and day-to-day garrison activities are legally intensive, necessitating the assignment of legal Marines to the staffs of commanders to facilitate mission accomplishment. Legal support requirements are significant and continue to increase, particularly as the number and scope of laws and regulations expands. Consequently, identifying and fulfilling legal support requirements are essential to the Marine Corps in order to fulfill its role in helping to preserve the security and prosperity of the Nation.

## Mission

The mission of the Marine Corps legal community is to provide timely, efficient, and appropriate command legal advice and legal services to commanders, Marines, Sailors, and their families to promote readiness and contribute to Marine Corps mission accomplishment.

## Marine Corps Legal Community

Marine Corps judge advocates, legal administrative officers (warrant officers), enlisted legal services specialists, and civilian personnel comprise the Marine Corps legal community. While there are a number of civilian members, the vast majority of the Marine Corps legal community is comprised of Marines. Uniformed Marines are able to support the Marine air-ground task force (MAGTF) across the full range of military operations. They are ready and able to provide legal services in expeditionary environments.

Note: An unrestricted commissioned officer in the Marine Corps can be designated by the Judge Advocate General of the Navy as a judge advocate, in accordance with United States Code, Title 10, *Armed Forces*, subtitle C, part II, chap. 539, sec. 5587a, *Regular Marine Corps: judge advocates*, and Secretary of the Navy Instruction (SECNAVINST) 1120.9A, Designation of Officers of the Regular Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve as Marine Corps Judge Advocates. The term staff judge advocate (SJA) refers to a judge advocate in a specific billet who serves as the primary legal advisor to a commander and provides command legal advice. See the Command Legal Advice and Staff Judge Advocate sections of this publication for more detailed information.

Members of the Marine Corps legal community also serve tours in nonlegal billets, to include command, staff, and leadership positions, as well as students at resident military schools. Service in these billets produces legal Marines who provide better advice and support to commanders and their staffs.

## Principles

The Marine Corps legal community operates with the following three fundamental principles that guide its actions in support of the Marine Corps:

- *Marines first*. Judge advocates, legal administrative officers, and legal services specialists are,
first and foremost, Marines who adhere to the Service's core values, maintain individual and
collective readiness, and ensure the welfare of those in their charge.
- *Professionalism*. Just as the military is a profession, so too is the practice of law. Members of
the Marine Corps legal community are part of two distinct, yet similar, professions, both bound to follow ethical and professional responsibilities.
- *Mission accomplishment*. The Marine Corps legal community provides timely and accurate
legal support that enables commanders to accomplish their missions, supports commanders in maintaining good order and discipline, protects individual rights, and enhances personal and
unit readiness.

## Types Of Legal Support And Functional Areas

There are two types of Service-level legal support: command legal advice and legal services support. Command legal advice is primarily provided by a command's SJA and the SJA's staff, while legal services support is primarily provided by regional legal services support sections (LSSSs) and their subordinate legal services support teams (LSSTs). Chapter 2 provides further discussion. Command legal advice and legal services support are provided across six functional areas: military justice, international and operational law, administrative law, civil law, legal assistance, and legal administration. Chapter 3 describes each of these functional areas in detail.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

## Chapter 2 Command Legal Advice And Legal Services Support

". . . having a lawyer that understands the culture . . . is critical in our [Marine Corps] culture and in the credibility of our judge advocates."
 Lieutenant General Richard F. Natonski Final Report of the Independent Review Panel to Study the Judge Advocate Requirements of the Department of the Navy Members of the legal community provide support to commanders in two different ways: command legal advice, primarily provided by SJAs, and legal services support, primarily provided by legal services support organizations. An understanding of each is necessary for commanders, their staffs, and members of the legal community to ensure that those with the right skills and knowledge perform required legal tasks.

## Command Legal Advice

Command legal advice is the legal advice provided by judge advocates in their role as command advisors, generally while in a SJA billet. The provision of command legal advice is a component of command and control. Legal advice helps inform the commander's decision-making process with respect to ensuring good order and discipline, maintaining unit readiness, and accomplishing assigned missions. Command legal advice includes, but is not limited to, that advice required by law and regulation. The term "command legal advice" specifically refers to the independent legal advice provided by judge advocates in accordance with United States Code, Title 10, *Armed Forces*, subtitle C, part I, chap. 506, sec. 5046, S*taff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps*. This legal advice is independent because judge advocates who provide the advice are not subject to evaluation of, or supervision in the content of, their advice beyond the commander for whom they work. Command legal advice requirements exist at nearly every level of command. General officers in command and other commanders exercising general court-martial convening authority (GCMCA)
must fulfill statutory and regulatory duties that require legal advice from a judge advocate. The duties of these commanders and their staffs that require legal advice are numerous, diverse, and situation dependent. These duties exist in garrison, during operations and exercises, and in combat. The legal advice requirements of commanders who do not exercise GCMCA are generally fulfilled by a superior commander's SJA. However, some subordinate commanders have sufficient command legal advice requirements to justify the full-time assignment of a Marine Corps judge advocate to serve as a special staff officer. Such assignments occur frequently, resulting in judge advocates assigned to Marine expeditionary units, special purpose MAGTFs, regimental landing teams, and others, depending on the size, mission requirements, and scale of the MAGTF. A Marine Corps judge advocate may also be assigned to a Marine Forces Special Operations Command-led special operations task force depending on mission requirements. Command legal advice requirements originate from the varied and complex areas of military justice and operational law. In July 1775, General George Washington and the Continental Congress appointed a judge advocate general to help manage the discipline of the newly created army.

Washington foresaw that commanders would require uniformed lawyers to assist in following and administering the specialized body of laws that apply to Service members and the laws that govern armed conflict. While the judge advocate began as an administrator of the criminal justice system, the operational legal needs of commanders, particularly advice on the law of war, grew quickly during and following the Civil War. As the legal issues confronting commanders and Service members have evolved and expanded, so have the areas in which uniformed lawyers support commanders. While military justice and operational law continue to be cornerstone functions of the Marine Corps legal community, the legal communities responsibilities have expanded to include administrative and civil law. The education, training, experience, and shared ethos that judge advocates offer commanders make them qualified to advise and support on nonlegal issues as well.

## Legal Services Support

Legal services support are recurring legal support tasks that are executed to implement a commander's decision; sustain the force; and support Service members, retirees, and their families. Legal services support falls within general sustainment or tactical-level logistics, depending on the organization providing the services. See Marine Corps Tactical Publications (MCTPs) 3-40B, Tactical-Level Logistics, and 3-40G, *Services in an Expeditionary Environment*, for more detailed information. Legal services support tasks are executed across all legal support functional areas.

Legal services support is primarily provided by the LSSSs and their subordinate LSST. The LSSSs and LSSTs are located within the supporting establishment, specifically Marine Corps Installations Command, where they provide continuous legal services support to all Marine Corps units as a function of general sustainment.

The office of the SJA resides with the headquarters element of each major subordinate command to the MAGTF. As part of this headquarters element, their primary role is command legal advice as a component of command and control; however, the office of the SJA can provide limited legal services support capabilities to their units as part of the command services subfunction of tacticallevel logistics. These tasks are limited to those within the organic capability of the SJA's office.

Limited legal services support is provided to individual clients when that service capability is organic to the SJA's office and does not interfere with the attorney-client relationship between the SJA and the Department of the Navy. Legal services support to a deployed MAGTF is task-organized based on mission requirements. The Marine logistics groups (MLGs) have legal community personnel on their tables of organization who work in the supporting establishment when not deployed. The MLGs can recall these personnel if mission requirements dictate. For example, if a more robust, forward-placed legal services support is required, the MLG can task-organize an LSST using the Marines recalled from the supporting establishment. Legal services support provided by the MLG in general support of the MAGTF is a subfunction of the combat service support services function of tactical-level logistics. The largest legal services support requirement is military justice, which exists everywhere Marines serve. The manner in which Marine Corps commanders use military justice to maintain good order and discipline reflects the Marine Corps culture and expeditionary nature, as well as the warrior ethos of Marines. Legal assistance for the personal, civil legal affairs of Service members also exists wherever Marines serve. The location and activity of the MAGTFcombat, forward-deployed operations and exercises, afloat, or in garrisonaffect the manner in which legal services support requirements, whether military justice, legal assistance, or another functional area, are fulfilled.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

## Chapter 3 Functional Areas

"It's just the potential, especially in a combat environment for mistakes to be made, some of which potentially could have a strategic level impact. . . . How many situations were averted because of the 'hands on' training, guidance, advice, et cetera that was really daily from an assigned embedded Judge Advocate? We'll never know."
 Lieutenant Colonel Willard A. Buhl Marine Corps Gazette, "The Battalion Judge Advocate"
The Marine legal community provides the Marine Corps with six functional areas

- Military justice. - International and operational law. - Administrative law. - Civil law. - Legal assistance. - Legal administration.
The primary purpose of the tasks entailed in each of the functional areas is to enhance mission accomplishment, unit readiness, quality of life, and, when necessary, to protect the rights of affected parties. The legal community enables effective and efficient operations by providing commanders, Marines, Sailors, and their families legal solutions wherever and whenever required.

Note: Some legal functions are provided at the departmental level, including environmental law, civilian personnel and labor law, real property and land use law, and acquisition law, among others. Support to the Marine Corps in these areas is provided by the Office of Counsel for the Commandant, a component of the Department of the Navy Office of General Counsel.

The backbone of each of these six functions is the ability to recruit and retain the right people, to educate and train them, to assign them properly, and to promote processes that ensure efficient and effective legal advice. Each of these functions, along with the capabilities they offer, are described in the following paragraphs.

## Military Justice

The Marine Corps legal community provides the following military justice capabilities at the Service-level: prosecution, defense, legal assistance to victims of crime, court reporting, and posttrial review. These capabilities also include advising commanders on the appropriate disposition of such misconduct, as well as giving general legal advice throughout the legal process. Certain military justice capabilities are provided by the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, including trial and appellate judiciary and appellate counsel. Members of the Marine Corps legal community work alongside Navy personnel in these billets to represent the values and interests of the Marine Corps. The Nation expects and our laws require that justice and due process are rendered before Service members are deprived of their life, liberty, or property. Congress and the President have provided the Military Services with the UCMJ and *Manual for Courts-Martial United States* that ensures due process rights are afforded to those accused of crimes while maintaining the interest of justice and the effectiveness of the Armed Forces. The Preamble to the Manual for Courts-Martial United States best captures this dynamic: "The purpose of military law is to promote justice, to assist in maintaining good order and discipline in the armed forces, to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the military establishment, and thereby to strengthen the national security of the United States." As identified in chapter 2, judge advocates in the US military originated with General Washington's need to administer military justice in order to maintain good order and discipline in the Continental Army. The origin of the Marine Corps legal community as its own distinct community is a direct result of the military justice requirements of commanders following Congress' passage of the UCMJ and follow-on legislation. Much like General Washington's first judge advocate, Marine Corps judge advocates assist commanders in understanding and applying complex areas of the law, thus freeing them and their staffs to focus on fighting and winning wars. Members of the Marine Corps legal community perform the vital role of supporting commanders' efforts to ensure a high state of discipline within the Marine Corps, while simultaneously maintaining justice for individuals. An effective, efficient, and fair military justice system enables the Marine Corps to execute military justice tasks while maintaining a standard worthy of the Nation's trust and confidence.

## International And Operational Law

International and operational law addresses all laws, both international and domestic, that impact the ability of the Marine Corps to conduct training, exercises, and operations. This includes areas such as the law of war, status of forces agreements, and rules of engagement.

This function also encompasses such divergent areas as operational fiscal law, military justice and foreign criminal jurisdiction, intelligence operations and oversight, operations in cyberspace, and domestic operations.

While the United States has implemented rules and regulations enforcing the law of war as far back as 1775, the function of international and operational law is a relatively recent development. Since the late 1970s, operational law has grown significantly within the Department of Defense (DOD), including the establishment of operational legal departments within Service headquarters. From the mid-1980s, within the Marine Corps operating forces, operational law support was provided primarily by the Marine Corps component commands, Marine expeditionary forces, and major subordinate command SJAs. After 11 September 2001, the increasingly complex nature of the environments within which military commanders found themselves operating led them to request the integration of legal advice with planning, training, and operations. As a result, the day-to-day practice of international and operational law is now almost exclusively the province of the judge advocate directly supporting the commander. Ultimately, Marine Corps success depends upon members of the Marine Corps legal community having the experience and adaptability to perform effectively in the operational environment. For example, the requirement for international and operational law expertise within the Marine Corps continues to increase as our involvement in intelligence and cyberspace operations increase. As special staff officers ingrained in the Service culture, Marine Corps judge advocatesand the enlisted personnel who support their effortshelp commanders conduct successful operations across the entire spectrum.

## Administrative Law

Administrative law addresses the statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions governing the establishment, functioning, and command of military organizations, as well as administrative actions regarding military personnel. This function includes command and regulatory authority, administrative investigations, officer and enlisted administrative separations, adverse administrative actions, and government ethics. The administrative law function has grown significantly since the 1950s. Substantial litigation and many changes to Title 10 and implementing regulations have made all aspects of administrative law more complex and considerably rule-based. This necessitates corresponding legal expertise to properly advise commanders. The fulfillment of the administrative law function facilitates the maintenance of good order and discipline and enables commanders to investigate incidents, pursue administrative corrective actions, maintain standards of conduct, and optimize individual and unit performance. The three largest subfunctions of administrative law are administrative investigations, military personnel law, and government ethics.

Administrative Investigations By far the most common administrative investigation is the command investigation. A command investigation serves to search out, develop, assemble, analyze, and record all available information related to the incident under investigation, allowing for a fully informed decision. The commander's use of command investigations serves many purposes, to include protecting the rights and benefits of individual Marines; assisting in making line of duty determinations; recognizing and recording the bases for corrective actions, remedies, and new processes; improving command management and administration; publishing lessons learned; resolving disputes and operational questions; facilitating the development of tactics, techniques, and procedures; and maintaining accountability of individual Marines. The complex nature of rules associated with investigations, as well as the potential for administrative, nonjudicial, or judicial follow-on actions, necessitates the constant involvement of legal personnel. See the Judge Advocate General Instruction (JAGINST) 5800.7F, *Manual of the Judge Advocate General*, for information on how to conduct a command investigation.

Military Personnel Law Military personnel law is the second significant subfunction of administrative law. It is the statutory and regulatory law governing actions and matters specified in United States Code, Title 10, *Armed Forces*, relating to officer and enlisted active, reserve, and retired uniformed Service members of all grades. Such actions and matters include policies and decisions relating to uniforms, leave and liberty, accessions, training, assignment and distribution, promotion (including presidential nominations and appointments, as well as adverse promotion actions such as delay, withhold, and removal), separation (including retirements and involuntary administrative separation), and officer personnel actions and records related to misconduct and substandard performance. Prevalent among the activities within administrative law is the administrative separation of both officers and enlisted Marines.

Government Ethics Government ethics (also referred to as standards of conduct) is the third primary subfunction of administrative law. It involves specific legal and ethical requirements imposed upon the Marine Corps, including relations with and support to non-Federal entities, financial disclosure requirements, fundraising, and gifts to and among Marines. Compliance with government ethics helps Marine Corps leaders and the Marine Corps maintain the public trust by placing loyalty to the Constitution, law, and ethical principles above private gain and entitlement.

## Civil Law

Civil law addresses the statutes, regulations, and judicial decisions that govern the rights and duties of military organizations and installations with regard to civil authorities, as well as interactions with civilian personnel requesting information or making claims against the United States. The majority of issues within this function fall under the category of interactions with civil authorities, including service of process, foreign criminal jurisdiction, defense support of civil authorities, domestic operational law, and the duties of a special assistant US attorney. Defense support of civil authorities and domestic operational law issues primarily emerge when the military supports civilian authorities during civil disturbances and natural disasters. Marine Corps judge advocates can be designated as special assistant US attorneys to represent Federal and DOD interests in the prosecution of civilians who allegedly commit crimes on military installations. Claims against the Government can present a significant issue for commanders, particularly in a deployed environment. Military operations and exercises entail the movement of personnel and equipment, often across great distances. Damage, loss, and injuries often occur, resulting in claims against the US Government. The claims subfunction of civil law provides for the prompt investigation, impartial adjudication, fair settlement, and timely payment of such claims. Claims emerging from military operations and exercises may be brought under a variety of statutes or international agreements or as alternatives to claims, such as solatia payments (i.e., damages awarded to a plaintiff in compensation for personal suffering or grief arising from injury) and statutory authority to pay battle damage claims in combat operations. The diverse capabilities offered by the civil law function contribute directly and indirectly to military readiness and combat effectiveness. The civil law support provided by the Marine Corps legal community helps Marine Corps leaders protect and promote the rights and duties of military organizations relative to civil authorities and protect the Federal interest from misconduct by civilians aboard military installations. The fair and just settlement of claims helps maintain morale when Service members suffer personal property loss as a result of military operations or when the local population, including foreign nationals, suffers harm during military operations and exercises.

## Legal Assistance

Legal assistance addresses the personal legal needs of individual Marines, Sailors, and their family members, increasing their personal readiness, and thus unit readiness. The legal assistance function provides support in the following areas: family law, estate planning (including wills), powers of attorney, naturalization, landlord-tenant law, consumer law, tax law, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and other personal, civil legal affairs. Legal assistance for Marines going through the Disability Evaluation System is provided through the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy.

The legal assistance function focuses on ensuring that Marines and their families receive sound legal advice that responds to their unique, individual needs. This allows Marines to resolve personal legal issues that could otherwise distract them from accomplishing the mission and decrease unit readiness. The legal assistance support that Marines receive while deployed helps them take care of themselves and their families, thereby enabling Marines to concentrate on their operational duties and the mission.

## Legal Administration

Legal administration is the sixth function of legal support. This function encompasses those tasks and associated capabilitiessome unique to legal supportnecessary for the internal administration of legal organizations. These tasks and associated capabilities include, but are not limited to, correspondence, budget, embarkation for deployment, and information technology. Information technology for the Marine Corps legal community is specialized and requires a unique mix of technical and legal knowledge.

## Headquarters, United States Marine Corps

Like all other commands, Headquarters, United States Marine Corps (HQMC) requires all six functions of Service-level legal support. However, many of the legal requirements within HQMC, though they fall within the six functions, are unique and concern the authorities of the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC); the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps; the Director, Marine Corps Staff; the Deputy Commandants; or Marine Corps functions and responsibilities relative to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy, the US Navy, various Government entities, and elected or appointed officials. The Judge Advocate Division (JAD) is responsible for supporting these unique HQMC legal functions. The legal services support needs of HQMC are provided by the regional LSSS. Departmental-level legal support to HQMC is provided by the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy or by the Office of the Counsel to the Commandant, a subordinate office of the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy.

## Chapter 4 Organization, Roles, And Responsibilities

"A commander needs instantaneous legal advice, but the tyranny of distance in Iraq prevents getting help from outside the unit, especially judge advocate help, when the help is needed.

My battalion JA [judge advocate] was crucial to the success of the battalion's detainee processing, which continues to get more complex and requires careful oversight to ensure the packages are complete and the detainee stays incarcerated. In dealing with locals, especially sheiks, my lawyer was particularly helpful. In Iraqi culture sheiks consider the CO [commanding officer] a very important man if he has his own lawyer. Perceived status is everything. Furthermore, in a culture like Iraq's where personal relationships are essential and everything is subject to negotiation and deal making, a lawyer's education, training, and insights are invaluable. I always took my lawyer with me when talking to locals. An infantry battalion simply cannot fight a COIN [counterinsurgency] operation without a judge advocate on the battalion staff."
The Marine Corps legal community facilitates the efficient and effective provision of legal support to both the operational forces and the supporting establishment. This is a significant challenge because the legal support requirements within the operational forces and supporting establishment are dynamic and susceptible to sudden change. Furthermore, there are two competing legal support missions: military justice and international and operational law. Military justice is the predominant mission while in garrison; while during exercises, operations, and combat, international and operational law is the focus (see chap. 3). Therefore, the legal community is organized so that all legal support functions are fulfilled in a manner that ensures the best support to commanders. As currently organized, each GCMCA (and certain subordinate commanders, as discussed in the Command Legal Advice paragraph of chapter 2) has an SJA to provide command legal advice and basic levels of legal services support. All legal services support beyond the organic capability of the SJA office is provided in garrison by one of four regional LSSSs and their nine subordinate LSSTs. Each LSSS (and its subordinate LSSTs) is located within one of the regional Marine Corps installations commands. In garrison, the majority of legal personnel are assigned to the LSSS or LSST to support the military justice function. When combat or other operations arise, operational commanders can recall legal personnel working in the LSSS or LSST to augment the SJA office and to establish an LSST in the MLG to provide forward-positioned legal services support. The LSST established by the MLG is flexible and scalable based on the needs of the supported MAGTF. This organizational structure maximizes the use of legal Marines in garrison while still providing a ready pool for deployment, thus reducing the total number of Marines needed to provide legal support. Commanders ultimately determine legal support requirements and priorities, assuming the risks associated with any particular legal support plan. Because legal support personnel and resources are finite, a recurring prioritization of legal support requirements among various commands is normal. The current organizational structure of the Marine Corps legal community is inherently flexible and readily capable of task organization based upon the requirements of the MAGTF. It accounts for the fact that command legal advice and legal services support are, in essence, two sides of the same coin. The structure of the Marine Corps legal community works because its members are Marines who understand the interrelationship between command legal advice and legal services support. That understanding is derived from a career progression that includes billets in both types of legal support, as well as unrestricted billets.

## Staff Judge Advocate To The Commandant Of The Marine Corps

The SJA to the CMC is the senior uniformed legal advisor to the CMC and performs duties relating to legal matters arising in the Marine Corps, and other duties as directed by the Secretary of the Navy or CMC. The specific responsibilities of the SJA to the CMC are numerous, diverse, and often situation dependent. The SJA's specific roles and responsibilities are discussed in the following subparagraphs. See Marine Corps Order (MCO) 5430.2, Roles and Responsibilities of the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, for further guidance.

Senior Uniformed Legal Advisor The SJA to the CMC is the senior uniformed legal advisor to the CMC as well as HQMC staff and agencies. In this role, the SJA to the CMC provides independent legal advice, counsel, and guidance on any matter within the SJA's cognizance, and any matter that may be assigned.

Director, Judge Advocate Division The SJA to the CMC serves as the director of the JAD, located within HQMC. As director of the JAD, the SJA to the CMC supervises and manages various branches in support of the Secretary of the Navy, CMC, and HQMC.
Proponent for Command Legal Advice and Legal Services Support The SJA to the CMC is the functional proponent for command legal advice and legal services support. In this role, the SJA to the CMC assists the CMC and HQMC officials with the execution of their Title 10 responsibilities to train, organize, and equip organic legal support essential to a global expeditionary force. The SJA to the CMC does this by, among other things, identifying capabilities, deficiencies, and solutions related to legal support structure and staffing. This includes the authority to advise the Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integration on legal structure and the Deputy Commandant for Manpower and Reserve Affairs on the assignment of legal personnel. This special authority is in recognition of the "unique requirements of the legal mission and professional development of the legal community," per SECNAVINST 5430.27D, Responsibility of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps for Supervision and Provision of Certain Legal Services.

Supervisor of the Legal Community The SJA to the CMC serves as functional supervisor of the Marine Corps legal community with the responsibility of overseeing and supervising the provision of legal support tasks within the Marine Corps on behalf of the CMC. This includes the authority to formulate, promulgate, implement, supervise, inspect, and enforce standards of practice and the use of uniform standards and procedures for the performance of legal support tasks. This authority does not include direction and control of individual legal community personnel in the performance of their duties. Direction and control of legal personnel remains an inherent function and responsibility of the respective commander. The SJA to the CMC executes a legal support inspection program and sends members of the staff to visit legal support providers around the world as an extension of the functional supervisory role.

Oversight of Legal Personnel The SJA to the CMC exercises professional responsibility oversight over all Marine Corps judge advocates, legal administrative officers, and legal services specialists, and over those civilian legal support personnel who practice law under the SJA's cognizance. For Marines, this authority exists regardless of assignment within or outside the Marine Corps, with the exception of trial and appellate judges.

## Judge Advocate Division, Headquarters, United States Marine Corps

The JAD serves two primary purposes. The first is to assist the SJA to the CMC in advising the Secretary of the Navy, CMC, and HQMC on legal matters. The second is to assist the SJA to the CMC in providing oversight of the Marine Corps legal community on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy and the CMC. The SJA to the CMC simultaneously serves as director of the JAD. The JAD is organized into branches and also contains an individual mobilization augmentee (IMA) detachment to supervise reserve legal services support. The branches cover all six functions of legal support, including the unique legal requirements of HQMC discussed in the Headquarters, United States Marine Corps paragraph of chapter 3. The provision of reserve legal support and the JAD IMA detachment are discussed in detail later in this chapter.

## Staff Judge Advocate

The SJA is a command's principal legal advisor and a member of the commander's special staff. The SJA advises the commander and staff on all matters within the SJA's cognizance, which includes all six functions of legal support, as well as any other matters on which the commander seeks advice. Staff judge advocates may be unable to provide the complete range of legal services support; available services are determined by the organic capabilities of the SJA's office.

Staff judge advocates are assigned at all levels of command, though they are primarily assigned to general officers in command and other GCMCAs. Subordinate commanders with significant command legal advice requirements are also assigned judge advocates, as discussed in the Command Legal Advice paragraph of chapter 2. By statute and regulation, many decisions require advice by an SJA before the commander can act.

Commanders are often required to speak directly to their SJA. For example, Article 6(b), UCMJ, requires convening authorities to "communicate directly with their staff judge advocates" in military justice matters. Regardless of statutes and regulations, commanders should seek the advice of their SJAs whenever necessary, including recommendations on courses of action (COAs). Many commanders routinely seek out their SJAs' opinions on other matters, often due to the special skills that legal training brings and the independent nature of their legal advice. As stated in United States Code, Title 10, section 5046, *Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps*, no one within the DOD may interfere with a judge advocate's ability to provide independent legal advice to commanders.

## Types Of Courts-Martial Convening Authorities

Summary court-martial (SCM) convening authority typically rests with any person who may convene a general court-martial (GCM) or special court-martial (SPCM). An SCM is a noncriminal forum that consists of one, impartial, active-duty commissioned officer, preferably O-3 or above, who conducts the trial proceedings and makes all the decisions required in the case. An SCM may try any person subject to the UCMJ, except commissioned officers, warrant officers, cadets, and midshipmen, typically for minor offenses. Perhaps the most important limitation on the jurisdiction of an SCM is that a Marine may refuse to be tried by an SCM, even if the Marine has previously refused nonjudicial punishment. In a trial by SCM, an accused has a right to consult with a defense counsel before trial, but does not have a right to be represented by a detailed military defense counsel at the hearing. Special court-martial convening authority typically rests with battalion/squadron or higher commanders. An SPCM is normally composed of a military judge alone or a military judge and other panel members, a legally competent trial counsel (prosecutor), and a defense counsel. The Government provides the accused with defense counsel at no expense. An enlisted Marine tried by SPCM may demand that at least one-third of the panel members be enlisted Service members.

An SPCM may try any Marine for any noncapital (non-death penalty) offense under the UCMJ.

An individual cannot refuse to be tried by a SPCM. General court-martial convening authority typically rests with a general officer who is the commander of an installation or major subordinate command or higher. A GCM is composed of a military judge alone or a military judge and other panel members, as well as legally qualified trial and defense counsel. The GCMCA may refer any person subject to the UCMJ for any offense made punishable by the UCMJ to any level of court-martial; however, prior to referral to a GCM, the GCMCA must comply with the requirements of Article 32, UCMJ (preliminary hearing), and Article 34, UCMJ (advice of SJA). A GCM may, upon conviction, recommend any punishment authorized by the UCMJ. An individual cannot refuse to be tried by a GCM.

Further information on the three types of courts-martial and their jurisdiction and composition can be found in the most current edition of the *Manual for Courts-Martial United States*, the JAGINST 5800.7F, Manual of the Judge Advocate General, and MCO P5800.16A, Marine Corps Manual for Legal Administration (Short Title: LEGADMINMAN).

## Legal Services Support Sections And Legal Services Support Teams

Legal services support outside the organic capability of the SJA is provided by consolidated legal services support organizations. These organizations are task-organized in a variety of sizes and capability sets. Marine Corps Installations Command has a permanent LSSSs for each of its four regions: Marine Corps Installations National Capital Region, Marine Corps Installations East, Marine Corps Installations West, and Marine Corps Installations Pacific. Each of the four LSSSs has between one and three subordinate LSSTs. The LSSSs and LSSTs geographically consolidate the provision of legal services support in garrison to develop greater unity of effort, to increase levels of professional supervision, and to create organizational efficiency, synergy, and flexibility. Consolidation while in garrison also helps to maintain continuity, depth, and breadth of experience in legal services support when legal Marines are not required for operational duties. Ultimately, the flexibility and regional reach of the LSSS allows leadership to provide the right Marines for the right legal services support tasks.

## The Marine Corps Defense Services Organization

The Marine Corps Defense Services Organization (also referred to as the DSO) is a functionally independent organization that provides zealous, ethical, and effective representation to Marines and Sailors in order to protect and promote individual rights under the law and regulations. The head of the Marine Corps Defense Services Organization is the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps. To maintain functional independence, the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps works directly for the SJA to the CMC.

## The Victims' Legal Counsel Organization

Congress established the authority for victims' legal counsel under United States Code, Title 10, Armed Forces, subtitle A, part II, chap. 53, secs. 1044, *Legal Assistance*, and 1044e, Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses, and chap. 80, sec. 1565b, Victims of sexual assault: access to legal assistance and services of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates. The victims' legal counsel primary duties are to advise and represent victims as required by law, regulation, and policies and procedures issued by the Victims' Legal Counsel Organization officer in charge. While the victims' legal counsel primarily operates in the military justice functional area, the placement of their statutory authority in close proximity to the authority for legal assistance clarifies the nature of the services that victims' legal counsel provide. The Victims' Legal Counsel Organization, which supervises the victims' legal counsel, is also functionally independent and provides ethical and effective representation to eligible clients in order to protect and promote individual rights under the law and regulations. The head of the Victims' Legal Counsel Organization is the officer in charge of the Victims' Legal Counsel Organization. To maintain functional independence, the officer in charge works directly for the SJA to the CMC.

## Reserve Legal Support

Like the Active Component of the Marine Corps, the Reserve Component has a legal community that helps provide legal support to the active and reserve forces. The organization of reserve legal support is similar to that of the Active Component. However, unlike in the Active Component, reserve legal services support billets are consolidated in one IMA detachment located within JAD, HQMC. The head of the JAD IMA detachment is competitively selected by the reserve senior leader board. The JAD IMA detachment contains branches to execute reserve legal services support tasks and assists in the execution of active duty legal services support tasks. The JAD IMA detachment also includes reserve legal billets that support departmental functions. Nondepartmental, reserve command legal advice billets remain on the table of the organization of the supported command. Although the JAD IMA detachment is placed within HQMC, its members are located throughout the United States in order to more easily provide support to local active duty and reserve commands.

## Chapter 5 Role Of The Judge Advocate In The Marine Corps Planning Process

"Decisions were impacted by legal considerations at every level. . . . Lawyers proved invaluable in the decision-making process."
The tenets of the Marine Corps Planning Processtop-down planning, single-battle concept, and integrated planningguide the commander's use of staff to plan and execute military operations. Today, most commanders engaged in operations have a judge advocate available for planning. In general terms, the judge advocate is the legal planner and advisor to the process. In order to effectively fill the role as advisor and planner, the judge advocate must be an effective staff officer who understands not only the laws and regulations, but also the military process and operation in which the command is engaged. Depending on the unit procedures and desires of the commander, legal advice is passed in different methods to different audiences within the process. When the commander is attempting to frame the problem, the judge advocate's role is to provide an overview and general principles of the applicable rules. From there, the judge advocate's attention will turn to a particular cell or issue brought to light during development of the plan. As the planning process develops, the judge advocate refines the general overview to apply to a particular issue within a COA. The judge advocate must be able to capture any advice in a form that appropriately supports the planning process and that may be included in any subsequent operational plans or orders.

## Legal Advice During The Planning Process

During planning, effective legal advice is built on the following three cornerstones:

- *Knowledge of the law*. All judge advocates must possess knowledge of the relevant and
applicable law and regulations in order to be effective advisors and planners.
- *Knowledge of the situation*. Knowledge of the situation shapes the framework for the advice.
This knowledge is gained through integration into the process, which is designed to develop
the ability to understand and analyze the situation. A staff properly executing the battle rhythm
in an operational environment is perpetually updating its knowledge of a situation and the planning process merely isolates a problem into a manageable framework in order to achieve a solution.
- *Knowledge of the process*. Understanding the planning process, whether it is deliberate or crisis
action planning, enables a judge advocate to take knowledge of the law as it applies to a situation and integrate this knowledge into the plan. Effective integration of the entire staff, including the
judge advocate, will prevent wasting valuable time and effort on a plan that should have been eliminated at its inception. As MAGTF officers with knowledge of Marine Corps Warfighting
Publication 5-10, *Marine Corps Planning Process*, Marine Corps judge advocates are uniquely equipped to provide specialized legal advice as a part of the overall staff.

## Measure Of Performance And Measure Of Effectiveness

The role of a judge advocate within a staff is to help generate and maintain tempo for a commander through the application of timely, correct, and complete legal advice. A solid foundational knowledge of the law, the situation, and the planning process supports the warfighting function of command and control by illuminating the commander's decision-making process through effective prioritization of requirements and enhances a judge advocate's value within a staff. The following four factors should be used to measure the performance and effectiveness of legal advice during the planning process:

- *Timeliness*. Legal advice must be available to all who require it when needed. - *Accuracy*. Legal advice is accurate when the applicable laws and regulations are correctly
applied to the facts and situation. As operations evolve, so must the legal advice.
- *Completeness*. The advice must address all legal requirements and meet the needs of the plan as
it moves forward and new COAs are developed or new issues arise.
- *Utility*. Judge advocates must provide advice in such a manner as to be meaningful to
commanders, planners, and other staff members unable to navigate the legal complexities presented by the applicable rules and regulations.
The manner in which these measures are met will vary within each unit. However, effective unit procedures will produce and capture legal advice in such a way that all these measures are met.

The judge advocate must understand the planning process and the implementing procedures in order to identify when and where legal advice is needed. Meeting these measures of performance and measures of effectiveness should be what commanders expect of any judge advocate engaged in the planning process.

## Early Integration: Problem Framing

Problem framing presents the first and best opportunity for the judge advocate to educate the commander, staff, and planners on the legal parameters of the operation. To be effective, the judge advocate must have access to all members of the staff and subordinate commanders, as well as the operational information required for planning. Early access and integration help weave the applicable rules into the entire planning process. Early education in laws and regulations helps to steer the commander, staff, and planners away from legally unsupportable COAs and focuses them on viable solutions. The early explanation of the rules applicable to any operation will act as a force multiplier. As an educator during the problem framing stage, the judge advocate provides relevant, timely, and accurate advice that is essential to the plan.

## Further Integration: Achieving Accuracy And Completeness

Just as all planners will continue to refine their input, so will the judge advocate refine and update advice as it applies to the developing situation. In continuing to participate in the process in this manner, the judge advocate ensures all advice is accurate and complete. As the planners fill in the details through COA development and COA war game, so will the judge advocate fill in the details of the broad legal parameters that were initially provided to the planners.

For example, the commander may direct the development of two COAs looking at two entirely different methods of troop insertion, one via ground and the other via air. While operating under the general rules initially presented, the judge advocate would be concerned with ensuring that the two COAs are lawful. Within the legal parameters of the theater, air lifting troops could present very different issues from those encountered in planning a ground insertion. This process of refining legal advice continues from COA development to COA war game. Course of action war game involves a detailed assessment of each COA, to include support estimates as they relate to the enemy and the other elements of the battlespace. The support estimate for the judge advocate goes further than simply determining there are no legal issues; the assessment of the COAs presents the legal planner another opportunity to refine the advice in light of what is expected to play out on the battlefield. The assessment process also allows the judge advocate to further educate the planners in the applicable rules in even greater detail as legal issues present themselves. The refinement of advice and guidance continues and intensifies as the process moves to COA comparison and decision. The comparison is often an open forum event. Commanders, planners, and staffs gather to present the COAs and provide assessments of supportability based upon their area of expertise and knowledge of the environment and the plan. The staff may simply provide estimates by recording a vote on a matrix. However, because the next step is a decision point for the commanderdetermining which COA is to be pursuedthe commander may want to hear not only whether a COA is supportable, but also the reasons that the COA is supportable based upon a staff member's area of expertise. Having initially been an advisor, the judge advocate must now formulate a legal opinion for the commander as to why one particular COA is better or worse than another. Typically, it is not enough to say that all COAs are equally supportable. However, the judge advocate is not a tactician and should refrain from providing tactical critiques, instead focusing on the lawfulness of the tactics. It is important to note that Marine judge advocates are subject to the same assessment, selection, basic training, and continuing education as other officers. So while the judge advocate should avoid tactical advice, an understanding of tactics is essential to provide the best advice on the lawfulness of various tactics. That knowledge of operational matters, which ultimately improves the quality of legal advice, is one of many reasons judge advocates are unrestricted officers and organic to commands. Provided the judge advocate is fully immersed and integrated into the process, a judge advocate should possess sufficient insight into the entirety of the situation to be able to advise why one plan is legally preferable to another.

Completeness as a measure of performance and measure of effectiveness is not fulfilled simply because the advice has been delivered to the commander. Once the decision is made, whether in a confirmation brief or the writing of an order, the judge advocate must take all of the advice that was provided throughout the process and package the advice in its final form. This final act ensures the completeness of the legal advice. The judge advocate must ensure the measures of performance and measures of effectiveness of timeliness, accuracy, completeness, and usability are met within the planning process. To do so requires the judge advocate to be fully integrated into the process from the earliest point. Ideally, this means serving as an educator on the legal environment during the problem framing stage, thereby assisting commanders and decision makers to better understand the environment. The judge advocate then refines the advice from a broad spectrum of rules to particular applications within COA development and COA war game. In this refinement, the judge advocate's advice becomes more accurate and complete. As the process comes to a decision point, all that has been learned is distilled into usable information in the form of an opinion. This opinion can either be woven into the plan or described within an appendix. Most importantly, the judge advocate is effective only if the judge advocate understands both the law and the process in which the advice and guidance are provided.

## Section Ii. Terms And Definitions

active dutyFull-time duty in the active military service of the United States, including active duty or full-time training duty of the Reserve Component. (DOD Dictionary) command1. The authority that a commander in the armed forces lawfully exercises over subordinates by virtue of rank or assignment. 2. An order given by a commander; that is, the will of the commander expressed for the purpose of bringing about a particular action. 3. A unit or units, an organization, or an area under the command of one individual. (DOD Dictionary) command and controlThe exercise of authority and direction by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. Also called C2. (DOD Dictionary) The means by which a commander recognizes what needs to be done and sees to it that appropriate actions are taken. Command and control is one of the six warfighting functions. Also called C2. (MCRP 1-10.2) defense support of civil authoritiesSupport provided by US Federal military forces, Department of Defense civilians, Department of Defense contract personnel, Department of Defense component assets, and National Guard forces (when the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the governors of the affected states, elects and requests to use those forces in Title 32, United States Code, status) in response to requests for assistance from civil authorities for domestic emergencies, law enforcement support, and other domestic activities, or from qualifying entities for special events. Also called **DSCA**. Also known as **civil support**.

(DOD Dictionary) detaineeAny person captured, detained, or otherwise under the control of Department of Defense personnel. (DOD Dictionary). expeditionary forceAn armed force organized to achieve a specific objective in a foreign country. (DOD Dictionary) force1. An aggregation of military personnel, weapon systems, equipment, and necessary support, or combination thereof. 2. A major subdivision of a fleet. (DOD Dictionary) individual mobilization augmenteeAn individual reservist attending drills who receives training and is preassigned to an Active Component organization, a Selective Service System, or a Federal Emergency Management Agency billet that must be filled on, or shortly after, mobilization. Also called IMA. (DOD Dictionary) judge advocateAn officer of the Judge Advocate General's Corps of the Army, Air Force, or Navy, or officers of the Marine Corps or Coast Guard designated as a judge advocate. Also called JA. (DOD Dictionary)
law of warThat part of international law that regulates the conduct of armed hostilities. Also called **the law of armed conflict**. See also **rules of engagement**. (DOD Dictionary) measure of effectivenessAn indicator used to measure a current system state, with change indicated by comparing multiple observations over time. Also called MOE. See also **mission**.

(DOD Dictionary) measure of performanceAn indicator used to measure a friendly action that is tied to measuring task accomplishment. Also called MOP. (DOD Dictionary) mission1. The task, together with the purpose, that clearly indicates the action to be taken and the reason therefore. 2. In common usage, especially when applied to lower military units, a duty assigned to an individual or unit; a task. 3. The dispatching of one or more aircraft to accomplish one particular task. (DOD Dictionary) Tasks assigned by the President to the combatant commanders in the Unified Command Plan. (MCRP 1-10.2) organicAssigned to and forming an essential part of a military organization as listed in its table of organization for the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps, and are assigned to the operating forces for the Navy. (DOD Dictionary)
readinessThe ability of military forces to fight and meet the demands of assigned missions.

(DOD Dictionary) Reserve ComponentThe Armed Forces of the United States Reserve Component consists of the Army National Guard of the United States, the Army Reserve, the Navy Reserve, the Marine Corps Reserve, the Air National Guard of the United States, the Air Force Reserve, and the Coast Guard Reserve. Also called RC. (DOD Dictionary) rules of engagementDirectives issued by competent military authority that delineate the circumstances and limitations under which United States forces will initiate and/or continue combat engagement with other forces encountered. Also called ROE. See also **law of war**.

(DOD Dictionary) staff judge advocateA judge advocate so designated in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, and the principal legal advisor of a Navy, Coast Guard, or joint force command who is a judge advocate. Also called SJA. (DOD Dictionary) sustainmentThe provision of logistics and personnel services required to maintain and prolong operations until successful mission accomplishment. (DOD Dictionary)
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

## References And Related Publications United States Code

United States Code, Title 10, Armed Forces
Subtitle A, part II, chap. 47, Uniform Code of Military Justice
Subtitle A, part II, chap. 53, sec. 1044, Legal Assistance
Subtitle A, part II, chap. 53, sec. 1044e, Special Victims' Counsel for victims of
sex-related offenses
Subtitle A, part II, chap. 80, sec. 1565b, Victims of sexual assault: access to legal assistance
and services of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Victim Advocates
Subtitle C, part I, chap. 506, sec. 5046, Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the
Marine Corps
Subtitle C, part II, chap. 539, sec. 5587a, Regular Marine Corps: judge advocates

## Department Of Defense

Manual for Courts-Martial United States

## Joint Issuances

DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms

## Secretary Of The Navy Instructions (Secnavinsts)

| 1120.9_                                                                      | Designation of Officers of the Regular Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| as Marine Corps Judge Advocates                                              |                                                                                 |
| 5430.27_                                                                     | Responsibility of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy and the Staff Judge    |
| Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps for Supervision and Provision |                                                                                 |
| of Certain Legal Services                                                    |                                                                                 |

## United States Marine Corps

Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP)
5-10
Marine Corps Planning Process
Marine Corps Tactical Publications (MCTPs)
3-40B
Tactical-Level Logistics
3-40G
Services in an Expeditionary Environment
Marine Corps Orders (MCOs)
P5800.16_
Marine Corps Manual for Legal Administration (Short Title: LEGADMINMAN)
w/changes 17
5430.2
Roles and Responsibilities of the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the
Marine Corps

## United States Navy

Judge Advocate General Instruction (JAGINST)
5800.7_
Manual of the Judge Advocate General (JAGMAN)

## Miscellaneous

Colonel Raymond E. Ruhlmann III "The Battalion Judge Advocate." *Marine Corps Gazette*, vol. 91, issue 3, March 2007, pp. 4041. Final Report of the Independent Review Panel to Study the Judge Advocate Requirements of the Department of the Navy. US Senate Committee on Army Services, Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 2011. Keeva, Steven "Lawyers in the War Room." *ABA Journal*, vol. 77, December 1991, pp. 5259. (77 A.B.A.J. 52).

## To Our Readers

Changes: Readers of this publication are encouraged to submit suggestions and changes to Doctrine Control Branch via e-mail: doctrine@usmc.mil. Suggestions and changes must include the following information:

- Location of change
Publication number and title Current page number Paragraph number (if applicable)
Line number Figure or table number (if applicable)
- Nature of change
Addition/deletion of text Proposed new text
Additional copies: If this publication is not an electronic only distribution, a printed copy may be obtained from Marine Corps Logistics Base, Albany, GA 31704-5001, by following the instructions in MCBul 5600, Marine Corps Doctrinal Publications Status. An electronic copy may be obtained from the United States Marine Corps Doctrine web page: https://homeport.usmc.mil/sites/mcdoctrine/SitePages/Home.aspx