Michael Rivette : Exactly, so that was all factored in. So you could see a decided shift from the Mosley case back towards the balance of the freedom of expression. Damien Carrick : Here's the lawyer for the newspaper, outside the London court, immediately following the Rio Ferdinand decision. Lawyer : I think it is unusual for newspapers to win privacy cases; the trend has certainly been against...in favour of privacy claimants and against defendants, but I don't think we won because the judge correctly carried out the balance. He looked at Rio Ferdinand, he looked at Rio Ferdinand, what he'd done, and he also looked at comments that had been made by the Football Association, and the England manager about the position of the England captain, and took all that into consideration. Damien Carrick : So there's this pendulum which is swinging back and forwards, but of course in the UK a few years ago there was enormous concern about the use of injunctions by public figures to prevent newspapers from publishing details such as the extramarital affairs of footballers. I mean, we had the Ryan Giggs case, Peter Bartlett, which was extraordinary, and picking up on what Michael Rivette says about social media, that was immensely important in that case. Peter Bartlett : Well, it was important in that case, but I think that case points out that parliament should not pass statutes that they can't enforce. Courts shouldn't pass or make judgments that they can't enforce. Damien