Skeeve is not here at the moment. Yesterday was my first full day at the Policy SIG, and I would like to thank Adam for his help and support. Just to remind you all, the Policy SIG development process, this is an extract from our process.  We have a process where we put policies up and then at this meeting we have face-to-face discussions in the SIG sessions, and those policies that we can put to the meeting and gauge that we have reached consensus on, we move on to the next stage of the process. Yesterday, we had some policy proposals which did gain consensus and some which didn't.  I am going to report on all of those for you. It's important to note that the next stage of the process is, for those that did reach consensus, we report these to you now.  That's what the slide says "We are here."  You are required again to endorse that proposal, anything that has got consensus, and signify that we should continue.  So these are checks and balances to make sure we do a good job on this. I will talk about the policy proposals in a moment. Before we got to the meeting, I posted on the mailing list saying I thought there were some things we were looking at where we needed to do a review of IPv6 policy.  We are now in stage 3 of IPv4 exhaustion.  We are in the last /8.  IPv6 policy is now