god, or a mathematical construct behind what ordinary people consider reality." This model is certainly not an intentionally perverted notion of reality.The model has arisen from determining what time actually is and what model will give subjective time and fit with relativity. It has developed from there until a structure was realised that is able to answer the fundamental questions. It is just a model which in my opinion works, is self consistent, corresponds to other science and explains observations in 3D space including some puzzles within cosmology and quantum physics. I am aware of its correspondence to Buddhist philosophy and the Judaic idea of an omnipotent, omnipresent, unknowable Creator.These are religious explanations of unknowable underlying reality. That is interesting but not a reason to reject the model as unacceptable.Rejection should be based on whether it works, is logical, corresponds with other science and can be used predictively.Not on personal prejudice. Yes I agree with you there is one reality. But it can be considered as two separate realities from our human perspective. This is because one part we are able to access and have knowledge of via information transfer(the picture, which is the subjective reality we inhabit)and the other part (the material reality itself)we can have no direct knowledge of by any means including the scientific method. Between these realities is the Prime Reality Interface where the information is detected by the senses or artificial sensors to provide data input, for subjective reality formation. When you think about it,