of qualifiers added or subtracted to your belief. I think to say "no" to the question "can you envision anything that will change your mind on this topic" but then to say "But I will have an open mind when I'm discussing this with you," is a basic contradiction which if carried out would probably look like you nodding your head a lot while someone discussed something and basically humoring that person until they were finished stating their points, but not really hearing any of it, definitely not accepting any of it (because you said that there was nothing that would change your point of view, so how could you accept any of it and not change your viewpoint accordingly?). I think the expression "to have an open mind" does not indicate some facade of being able to accept the fact that other viewpoints exist or a general idea of tolerance while inside being absolutely unchangeable on belief or worldview... that isn't what "to have an open mind" means. The first box in this graph only means to indicate that to have an actual, real discussion where, you know, people understand things at a deeper level, the two parties involved must not hold on to what in essence are arguable facts for any reason other than the idea that the existence of those facts is supported by a flawless line of logic/ evidence. Because why have any sort of logical discussion with anyone if, for example, you actually point out