the name. So unless you wish to claim that this letter is a fake too simply because it contradicts you. Also if you think that Acts is fictional you have no reason not to think the entire bible is fictional unless you just want a reason to hate Paul and now that all of your other excuses have fallen through you resort to pretending that Acts is false. Also if it is fake then why did you use it to prove things against Paul? Obviously if these things never happened then it doesn't Matter what Paul does in these books. And also if it is a fake then it shouldn?t matter what Paul wrote in Galatians because it doesn?t have anything to contradict. Most scholars think Matthew was copying from Mark (who also wasn't a first hand witness). And the only evidence about the author of John is double hearsay from Iraeneus - the book itself doesn't identify its author. True Matthew was copying form Mark but he was also elaborating on it. THe reason I think that these books where written by those authors is the same reaons I trust that Jesus did in fact rise from the Dead. the answer is faith. True Matthew was copying form Mark but he was also elaborating on it. THe reason I think that these books where written by those authors is the same reaons I trust that Jesus did in fact rise from the Dead. the answer is faith. Exactly. Faith