of the breach of confidence actions.  It highlights a generally conservative approach taken in this area to date (notwithstanding the commentary of Gleeson CJ in ABC v Lenah Game Meats and the Court of Appeal in Giller v Procopets) Damien Carrick : I'd like to talk about a case recently, a week or so ago, in Melbourne, involving Geoffrey Edelsten. Now, we have to be careful here because there are suppression orders, but he won a high profile case against a US woman that he met online, but there was an injunction on any discussion of their dealings. Now, there does seem to be a paradox here because Geoffrey Edelsten and his wife Brynne Edelsten are currently involved in a reality TV show called My Bedazzled Life , and these are people who are clearly making a living out of bringing people into their private lives, but they also want to control that access. Peter Bartlett, what are your thoughts? Peter Bartlett : Well, the media actually appeared in that case to try and oppose a suppression order, or injunction, and a limited form of order was made, and it was made on the basis that there was a confidentiality agreement between the parties. It was a contractual thing, and on that basis the judge took the view that certain materials should be suppressed. Damien Carrick : So, on the basis that there is a contract, rather than the nature of the contract? Peter Bartlett : Exactly, and you would