owners, on the woman's family, and on the woman herself. Might be worried that the victim's family is going to draw the just conclusion that this whole genetic family of dogs is inherently dangerous. Doesn't realize s/he's acknowledging 'don't matter if you raise them from pup, they still might suddenly kill you.' Is glad the dog type is being obfuscated by inventing yet another paper breed name...and now drunk on that success wants to censor the naming of what these monsters in fact do. Thinks s/he can dictate no more mentioning mauling, maiming, dismembering and killing, we all have to call it 'dog bites'. After all, it's making that distinction that is getting these pit fans into so much trouble when they try to use 'dog bite' statistics. To make it even more appalling, this self-serving message and complete indifference to protecting human life is disguised as concern for relatives of the woman who died. Really the only goal here is to make sure this doesn't get counted as pit bull type dog attack, or even as an attack at all. In fact, the only way we are going to stop this kind of tragedy happening is to acknowledge what Family Friend says: There is a type of dog that suddenly kills, no matter that you were a loving participant in raising them. Only by acknowledging this fact can we protect ourselves...and could this young woman have protected herself. Preston Comment #15 | Tuesday, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:12 am