the emotional state of ALL sex workers and ALL black people (which I still don't understand how black people came into the conversation, as you completely missed the point of my analogy). Therefore, I countered with the simple statement that, hey, you know what? I know some black people. I'll ask them what their opinion is on the matter. I'll let them judge if my comment was "dehumanizing." I also know a ton of sex workers. I'll ask them as well. You set the perimeters of the conversation, then you got offended when I worked within those perimeters. Now, I'm willing to grant that Twitter can confuse things. However, I'm not so gracious as to grant that this post and your continued stance on the matter (after several clarifications) are not willful. What do you have to say about how the op has conducted himself/herself on the matter? And my point was proven by your non answer. There is no incompatibility with The originally stated ideals of A+ Yet the supporting crowd continues to push away libertarians. I can tell you i was on board with the original ideals. But as soon as i saw what is happening and the underpinnings of the people involved i want no part. Just remember your stance on libertarians when people who support A+ keep coming out and saying its inclusive not exclusive. I don't mind exclusion. I mind social manipulation with a goal towards driving a political wedge. are you talking to me?