to Jonathan. I started following your entries a few months ago and enjoy reading your input. I am a relatively new supporter of Federer but became quite knowledgeable about his game quite quickly, mainly because I became quite an afficionado right away. He is the reason I picked up tennis again at the age of 28. Having said that, I think you're being a bit too harsh on him. I missed the first half of the first set and maybe I missed something there but I thought he didn't play/move as terribly as you described. I think Andy played fantastic (and I don't favor him very much; think he has an insipid personality or no personality at all). Federer's serve was MIA, that's true, but the low return stats are very much due to how Andy played, I thought. Perhaps Andy didn't let Federer loosen up and play his game? I don't think he moved bad but just some of his footwork was sluggish. Just wasn't as sharp as he can be, if you're not in the right position to play the shot then you mis hit, shank or generate no power. Seemed to happen quite abit today. Murray played well enough but wasn't like he was on another level. Didn't really have to work hard for his breaks of serve. He returned well as he usually does and Fed just served poorly. I think to be honest that Fed has played too much now this year. And it's more