Should the Duchess of Cambridge have been able to expect privacy on her French holiday? Some people are saying she is naive for thinking she could go topless without pictures coming out somewhere, while the couples' legal action surely indicates just how angry they are about their privacy being breached? 41 Replies "This was a thread I'd thought about starting today when I read the headlines but thought I'd see if anyone else did so. My take on this is that the Duchess was indeed naive. Now that the pictures are out it is the end of it. There is simply nothing they can do. It is sad to think that someone would take the pictures and make money out of them. Now I think I'm being naive. Granted the palace can press the charges, that won't stop this batch. I think all should move on and put it down to experience. Maybe give the damages to charity so someone benefits." "I think the Duchess has every right to privacy. If she had decided to whip them out in a public place then, fair enough. But when you go to the bother of renting a hideaway holiday home to be out of the way, then surely this signals that privacy is what is wanted. The sneak who took the pics has reportedly made enough cash to buy a house with his ill gotten gains, the really sad thing in all this is that there is a market for this type