to believe as a fact. Not to mention the people with Paul on the journey who didn?t understand/ hear the message. The law of the two or three witnesses is widely accepted by theologians (and by common sense). Since Luke was never mentioned by any of the original apostles, he is basically an unknown, and therefore not an authority for anything. Anybody can write a book and claim it is is inspired. If I wrote one, you would not accept it. The Catholics accepted Paul and his disciple, Luke, only because their agendas were compatible. The claims of Paul to receive a vision from Christ without witnesses are doubly doutful because they are contained in a fictional book written by Luke, a person who was never recognized to be an authority by the Twelve. And besides, the events in Acts are soundly contradicted by Paul's own account in Galatians (in which he never mentioned a vision on the road to Damascus) and are also contradicted by Matthew, Mark and John. Holy scripture cannot contain blatant contradictions. And Jesus never predicted the arrival of new apostles beyond The Twelve, He only predicted the arrival of new false apostles. I will read Galatians today but you are wrong about none of the other apostles mentioning him: 2 Peter 3 15 Bear in mind that our Lord's patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 2 Peter was written by Peter thus