AGW, is it that there is control of all the world's media or do the world's media only report what they are fed? The question is: What report will be next and to what end or purpose are these reports leading to? "Visible light that comes from an incandescent light bulb in your home puts out 10^6 more energy than your cell phone. Do you get "baked" sitting under the light from this when you are reading a book?" If the cooling of the 70?s over Antarctica is going to be blamed on the ozone hole, then the shrinkage globally of the upper atmosphere lately is going to be letting a lot of heat out of the planet, and deep cooling will be the result. You can't have it both ways. But you sure can fool a lot of politicians who are eager to be spoon fed. I listened to the interview with the "recent warming in Antartica has been reverse-modeled to make up for lack of stations" author who indicated in no uncertain terms that the ozone hole over Eastern Antarctica was to blame for the cooling there. You can find that on NPR (National Public Radio) with the interviewer reacting a bit skeptically. "The strongest consensus on the causes of global warming came from climatologists who are active in climate research, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role." And, from what I read here and at other sites, you'd get about the same number here. The issue