those people, but the word "objective" doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. A=A (but only in the right typeface) posted by acb at 9:25 AM on November 16, 2009 It looks like they accidentally printed "Do not loon on dear" and tried to fix it later. posted by rlk at 9:33 AM on November 16, 2009 [ 1 favorite ] I try to downplay it, but... The thing is, if you know how something is "supposed" to work, yes, it can be offensive to your sensibilities when you see it poorly executed. But in my opinion, as a designer, it's your job to have that relationship with the entire world. I think many focus on type because it's an obscure knowledge with ubiquitous application. Perfect recipe for a bit of snobbery. But that's just knowing about something. Which is not the same as caring about something. If you love type, then your mind doesn't have room for bad type. And if you live in NYC and love type, then you don't need gps coordinates to know that this is on the corner of 25th and 6th, and the Lubalin Archives are at the Cooper Union, and why worry about the bad, when there's so much good? posted by billyfleetwood at 10:23 AM on November 16, 2009 When you look at a paragraph of Arial dishonesty and confusion stares at you from within. You might not notice it, without having been shown, but it's objectively there nonetheless. Okay,