that much of one. Like how do the Scotia bank ones stand up?: http://www.scotiabank.com/ca/en/0,,393,0\\... I'm by no means an expert at this stuff but some of it seems fairly obvious when you're trying to track down their good deeds aside from their mandates and those lame overview statements they provide about what their funds stand for, rhetorically speaking that is. I really would like some feedback, and if you think it is next to impossible to do some of this stuff, please explain that too. If you think I am digging down the wrong tunnel please say that rather than skip over this babble entry and not saying a thing. I somewhat imagine that some of the reasons for poor stock performance in some wind and solar energy may have little to do with true bad performace but may be due to a lack of sufficient funding to get the real depth of the project implemented that is necessary to start making a return on profits. There are plausible reasons why ethical investing may not be functional due to lack of funding to get a project off the ground, that easily is supplied to more readily returnable profit to shareholder companies like those involved in tar sands energy for example. Provide some feedback please. You know in a number of ways this ethics of investments goes to the heart of society's blind trust that led to this financial crisis of gouging customers and ripping the face off clients type stuff,