and have no further claims on it. Price the f'ing work and ask a price for it and release it when you get that money not sooner, what is wrong with that? Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: An inability to determine what constitutes an obvious invention itself is a criticism of the patent system. Patents should only be granted on inventions that won't exist without patents. Without patents, progress will happen and many inventions will continue to occur, as they have in the past in areas without them and as they do today as well in areas that don't really enforce them. The question is, how do we filter out the bad patents from the good ones. If we can not, then that's a criticism of having patents to begin with. We should not grant a patent on every possible idea or invention that anyone can come up with. Also if we can't tell the difference between what deserves a patent and what doesn't, then who's to say that anything deserves a patent? Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Agreed the fact that Glenn Beck its allowed to drive a car from any manufacture and use it for his own personal financial gain should be prohibit, also no electronic manufacturer should let him get away with what he say on television using their creations to make money from himself without having to pay anything to them it is a damn shame. Re: Re: "i think once you have a structure