people like you get branded a loony." Thanks, Peter. I guess it doesn't seem very coherent. But then again, neither is the official story which you seem so happy to accept. The US governemnt plan called Project Northwood suggested using remote controlled planes and that was in the early 1960s - I would have thought it was even easier to fly remote controlled aircraft nowadays. Comment number 88. You can fool some of the people all of the time I guess. This blog is a testiment to that. The BBC finally allowed the public to see video footage of WTC7 collapsing, after refusing to air this major event for over 5 years. Mike Rudin's been given the task of showing us the footage of what looks like a demolition, and trying to convince us that it's not a demolition. Some of you have apparently been fooled. It's the Emperors New Clothes for the 21st century. One thing I've noticed over the last couple of years, is that the people supporting the official story will often change their minds, as the official story changes. First, the official story people claimed that WTC7 was fake, or that the collapse didn't happen on 9-11, because it wasn't in the 9-11 commission report, and our media hadn't told us about it. Then they claimed that the substation and fuel tanks were to blame, as these theories were postulated on tv and in the news. Now their opinion has changed to support the fire initiated