coverage more after "ClimateGate". Poles Apart doesn't nail the issue completely, but its broad conclusion may be familiar to many: "The weight of this study would suggest that, out of this wide range of factors, the presence of politicians espousing some variation of climate scepticism, the existence of organised interests that feed sceptical coverage, and partisan media receptive to this message, all play a particularly significant role in explaining the greater prevalence of sceptical voices in the print media of the USA and the UK." To those who despair of the success of sceptical lobbying, the message is clear: learn one of the languages of Brazil, China or India. Comment number 2. PragueImp 10th November 2011 - 10:54 With the exception of President Klaus, I don't hear or see much climate skepticism here in the Czech Republic. I also work a lot in Germany and would say the same is true there. Maybe the political divide in the UK and USA has a lot to do with this - media biased to left or right with little consensus? In other nations the press may not be so polemic? Or so influenced by politicians? This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able