we reach consensus on this policy that we actually abandon this prop-069? At this point, I would like you to signify if you are in favour of that.  Please put your hands up.  This is not just APNIC Members. Anybody against us doing that, abandoning, apart from the troublemakers in the middle?  OK. I am happy that we have reached consensus.  It's sort of an informal consensus because it's not really a full proposal but I think it's good for us to go through the mechanisms.  Thank you. We had four more normal proposals, proposals that we would normally deal with at the Policy SIG, yesterday. Prop-096 talked about maintaining demonstrated needs requirement in transfer policy in the final /8 phase policy.  We had a proposal about optimizing IPv6 allocation strategies, and we had one about IPv6 reservation for large networks and another proposal about a national IP address plan, an allocation of country-wide IP address blocks.  I will talk a little about each of them in more detail. Prop-096, maintaining demonstrated needs.  In summary, the problems this proposal aims to address are that APNIC is the only RIR that does not have a required demonstrated need for transfers.  All the other RIRs have this. Other RIRs are reluctant to recognize any inter-RIR transfer policy with APNIC.  That's kind of a problem for us because we don't have any addresses and they do. So this is what this policy addresses. The proposed solution was that recipients of transfers be required