proves all along is that the trumped-up charges against Assange by a Swedish prosecutor were a guise to get Assange extradited to the US where, as he suspects, he would face a long time in harsh conditions, just for revealing the truth. The US is looked upon now like some of the countries it used to criticise, those that have no real laws to protect their citizens, just prisons and gulags to keep dissidents out of the way. . I fear for the future. Why did this same government let Yvonne Fletcher's killers travel from their embassy to the airport, while it will not do the same for Assange who has not been proved to have committed any crime at all, let alone murder? David Mills has clearly not familiarised himself with the Assange affaire other than through the filters of the UK MSM. Assange has not been charged with any offense in any jurisdiction. He has consistently offered to submit himself to questioning by the Swedish police and that offer remains open. He even remained in Sweden for two weeks following the original complaints against him for that purpose. But the original Swedish presecutor considered the complaints too trivial to warrant further action and he left. So what caused the Swedish about face and the drastic step of issuing a European Arrest Warrant against someone with no charges pending? Here's a clue -- Towards the end of Assange's two week wait in Sweden, Carl Rove arrived in Stockholm, ostensibly