History Of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology: Nationalism, Colonialism, And The Past , 2007, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, pp. 131-134. It would come as a surprise to many that even a scientific discipline such as archaeology had to find its place amongst contemporary political events in juxtaposition with western imperial and nationalistic ideologies current in the nineteenth century. Hence, in the words of Daz-Andreu, "... archaeology is not a value-free and neutral social science as previously presumed." [ ibid ., p. 4]. Seen by many as the archaeology of the Levant with a (evangelical) Biblical bias, it is of course an entirely different discussion if such a discipline named biblical archaeology is even appropriate. For some topical views see P. R. S. Moorey, A Century Of Biblical Archaeology , 1991, The Lutterworth Press: Cambridge (UK); M. C. Moreland ( Ed .), Between Text And Artifact: Integrating Archaeology In Biblical Studies Teaching , 2003, Society Of Biblical Literature: Atlanta; T. W. Davis, Shifting Sands: The Rise And Fall Of Biblical Archaeology , 2004, Oxford University Press Inc.: New York; J. K. Hoffmeier & A. Millard ( Eds .), The Future Of Biblical Archaeology: Reassessing Methodologies And Assumptions , 2004, The Proceedings Of A Symposium August 12-14, 2001 At Trinity International University, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.: Grand Rapids (MI) & Cambridge (UK). [9] These are the two most accepted models although presently a few others do exist. For example see G. A. Rendsburg, " The Date Of The Exodus And The Conquest/Settlement: