example - they've got 3,000,000 people they follow and 5,000,000 that follow them. and only 4,000 tweets! auf - I found that with some of the other sites (bright minds, I think) - they don't know their logical ands from their logical ors. Still, at least that means they aren't generating just bath bomb kits. I got some fairly good (read: blood-boiling) pictures today, which I'll upload to Facebook when I get home. Should we encourage our 'likers' again to upload their own photos of retailers that are getting it right (to show it can be done easily!), the ones that are getting it wrong, and also pictures of their kids (or either gender) who are just getting on with playing, and enjoying toys that wouldn't be marketed to them because of their gender. Once we have a decent number of pictures, I'd like to organise them into albums - kids letting toys be toys, shops letting toys be toys, and then one for pics of the worst offenders. Also, does another facebook admin know how to make a tab for the twitter address (next to the boxes for photos and where the number of 'likes' is displayed), so that it doesn't have to sit at the top of our timeline? Where it is now, it pushes new posts further down the page so that you have to scroll down to see them. I glanced at it this morning and mistakenly thought it was the most recent post, and I'm