money. I am an adoptive mom who is eternally grateful for the women who chose life over abortion. So I tend to lean toward pro-life. However, as a woman, I don't care to be part of an unnecessary medical procedure forced on me by misguided laws. But I'm a bit confused. Most of you are outraged that a doctor can be forced by law to perform an unnecessary procedure, and rightfully so. But at the same time, many have jumped on the post from "Sam" which suggested that there may be doctors equally outraged about being forced to go against their beliefs in order to protect their livelihood. So here's my question...if you are outraged that a dr can be forced into performing procedures mandated by law...are you equally as outraged that a doctor can be sued, lose his practice, etc for not perscribing the morning after pill? I get the difference between following a law vs. making a personal decision/choice about what you do with your practice...but at the bottom line, are any of us concerned about protecting the rights of doctors who make decisions that just happen to lean toward pro life? I'm concerned about both but am scared to death that so many others aren't. :-( 1) In your tweet containing this story, you used the term "mandated." While not used in the article, I want to clear up any misconception. I'm assuming all this is related to the drama in Virginia surrounding abortions. To clear up