knew there were inklings of this kind of thing (and personally I think you knew more than that) wouldn't it have been prudent to look into it then? Or did you just not care? Is that this is being brought up just before election time. Considering this happened six years ago, I believe this is a deliberate attempt to slander Mr.. Davis. From what I have gathered, the event happened during his late twenties while bar hopping with friends and colleagues. Can we please just move on and judge our candidates on who they are today, as opposed to hearsay? Even more odd is that SFBG is so quick to find Davis guilty of a serious offense when no charges were ever brought against him and no formal investigation conducted. You've played judge, jury, and prosecution in an event that threatens to destroy this man's entire career. One would think that a bit more discretion would be exercised in this instance as well as in his endorsement. Julian Davis should be held responsible for his actions, no doubt about that. It appears from various reporting on these events that he indeed took responsibility for his actions by making amends with both alleged victims months ago. What will ruin his career at this point is creating a media storm and shoving him out of a race which he has built from a serious underdog position with grace, compassion, vigor, and respect. I feel sorry for the man. Yeah, saying that Davis