just refuse to absorb anything which doesn't fit into your perspective. Not much of a surprise considering that ignorance of the I/P conflict never prevented the British left from launching racist boycotts or support Islamist fundamentalists. Just under my first comment an anti-Semitic poster compared Peres to Hitler, but why should you bother with that, after all it is, as you said - "our duty to question the foreign policy of Israel, and to highlight the plight of the palestinian people." And when duty calls, nothing else matter. ----------------------------------------\\... toniburtoni "Realistically, fault lies on both sided of this political divide" ----------------------------------------\\... I agree with that. I would love to see this point of view in the cover of the I/P conflict in the Guardian but than again, why bother. This newspaper is, as you said - "an excellent newspaper, as long as you recognise its slant". I guess that "slant" is used by you to describe an on going anti-Israel cover of the I/P conflict, biased opinion articles or giving room to people who promote suicide bombing like Azzam Tamimi et al. But again, who cares about giving room to a few Jew-haters in the Guardian, after all it is better media provider than the Sun, Mail or Fox, and a little bit of antisemitism never heart anyone, especially if it falls under the duty of questioning the foreign policy of Israel, and highlighting the plight of the Palestinian people. toniburtoni is a proof that when the British left isn't