it on his own hardware - that would be both against the law and silly. It's not that he's edited it and made a collage of it (legal in the US but not in Canada under Fair Use/Fair Dealing - at least until Bill C-32 comes to pass) It's not that he's the only one with a domain name that is similar to the show's name, he's not - in fact the show does not even have "deadliestcatch.com" What the legal-beagles don't seem to understand is that such fan sites as this are what make a show work today. They are what help keep people interested and in fact do the show a major service in many ways. One of the major ways these fan sites help the show is that they support fans that a legitimate site might not appreciate. Fans come in all shapes and size and temperaments. I know, I help look after a "kid friendly" set of sites, and some of the people we've attracted really need to be somewhere else away from the kids. Same thing goes when you're a fairly family-oriented channel like DC - you have a show like Deadliest Catch that attracts some of the more adventurous, and of course likely weird and hence likely to be disruptive to the "normal" people the site might attract, it sure would be nice if they went elsewhere but still supported you... Anyway - 'nuff said. IMHO they (the lawyers) 're idiots. Personally this puts