solar, wind, hydroelectric, and biomass. This will be difficult. As to our energy policy we should replace imported fuel with our own production. This will not help the global warming problem, nor will it hurt it. In the meantime this will give us more energy security and will help our economy and balance of payments. To show just how full of it and political NOT scientific UCS is go to their page on the "massive increase" in extreme weather caused by global warming: http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/sci\\... Then go to this link to see the real data (All sourced with links you can check) and see the actual number of all extreme events for past 70 years by type of event. These ask yourself who are you gonna believe UCS or YOUR LYING EYES!!! Then also read their study, i use that term loosely, on Fox News climate bias. It is so poorly done and biased that it couldn't get a passing grade as an 8th grade study project. (Note Fox may be bias but this study proves nothing, its not even sourced of what the biased quotes were and if a host or guest made them.) http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/g\\... Just in case anyone wonders where I am coming from, I am in RE industry with hundreds of installed commercial, industrial and a few utility projects. I believe CO2 has wormed earth about 1.8 degrees but further warming is limited as CO2 heating effect has significantly diminishing returns for each doubling. Im skeptical because the