he did not identify changes made to his first report referring to Mr Tomlinson's liver injuries. He played down signs of bleeding by saying there was "no sign of haematoma" on his liver and also failed to comment on the significance of these changes, which was misleading, the panel said. Also in the second report, Dr Patel wrongly concluded that Mr Tomlinson died of a heart attack, and wrongly concluded that "death could not have been due to haemorrhage" and "the injury to the liver was relatively minor", the panel found. And despite having seen CCTV footage of Mr Tomlinson being hit with a baton by a policeman, Dr Patel also wrongly concluded that "there were no significant marks of violence from assault or forceful restraint". The panel has been sitting in Manchester but is due to relocate to London for three days so that Dr Patel can give evidence in person. Just shiws that it takes a criminal to know one. All police are criminals at heart, the challenge the public have is to get past the police standards departments and the policophilic "I"PCC who care onlyto protect policefrom their own criminal behaviour. Keep 'em coming. Lets use this little slot of the www to keep (some) track of all this. "policophilic " -- LOL. So true. I think the MSCM (MainStream Corporate Media) don't give corrupt cops the attention the deserve. Imagine if every bad cop story made it onto the news... the people would be out in