wanted terrorists' section , but NOT for 9/11! that's right NOT FOR 9/11 why? they say: "we simply don't have the evidence.." So the FBI are now 'truthers'. don't believe it? look: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/ter\\... so now we know the official story has holes. all 'truthers' want is the truth. is that too much to ask? i think we all deserve it. Especially those more directly affected. Also, who said what about pulling WTC 7 is largely irrelevant, to be pulled the building AT ALL it had to have had the explosives to do the job installed prior to the event, obviously. these types of demolitions take 3-4 weeks to set up. So, no matter what, we know that the building was ready for pulling the day before sept 11 2001 as it cannot be done in a day, especially THAT day. therefore those who planned WTC 7 to be fitted with the explosives had prior knowledge of that days events. or do they have these explosives fitted just in case the building might need a tug one day? PS: anyone who still insists it was not a demolition needs to use the WWW to look up physics for 1st year high school. in particular 'the path of least resistance',and 'gravity' (22mph per sec). Comment number 38. A while back a friend of mine said he had seen one of the key conspiracy films, "Loose Change", and found it very convincing. Since I hadn't seen it, and as a scientist, I decided