utilities. And the fact that jet fuel must be aerosolized to a relatively high range of concentrations for it to explode, as opposed to simply burning on ignition, leaves me wondering why NIST failed to make any sort of conjecture as to the route fuel might have taken, the concentrations evaporating fuel could have reached in the first ten minutes 1000 feet below the strike zone. And NO explanation for these reports other than to say "it is plausible" jet fuel fireballs were the cause. Within the first 5 to 8 minutes... Your reliance on NIST's report is understandable, but if there is in fact a coverup, by not considering alternatives you support that effort. In some of your documentary work on this you allow contrary opinions to be heard, but not in great depth, while placing great weight on those backing the official conspiracy theory. Comment number 19. Mike - while it's useful to get all these theories involving physical evidence 'out the way' so to speak (I can see Hank rolling his eyes at me already), I do wish you'd hurry up and do a programme on Omar Saeed Sheikh. Specifically, to explore the 'alleged' connections between him and the ISI, his 'alleged' funding of the 9/11 attacks, and his 'alleged' involvement in the awful capture and beheading of journalist Daniel Pearl. If I honestly believed 9/11 was an inside job, then this is where I'd be looking - the top level funding and planning of what actually