denied. After discovering this misquote, I called Diane's attorney, Craig Cooley, and called it to his attention. He wrote a supplement to the appeal "before" the "three panel judges" ruled, but to no avail, the three panel judges denied her appeal. In an affidavit Chuckie wrote, that was notarised on March 8, 2005, he (Chuckie) writes, "I never testified at trial that I saw my mother, Diane Fleming, "mixing" the contents of any Gatorade bottles. In fact, I do not recall seeing my mother ever touching the Gatorade bottles." It is so hard to understand how many times, just a simple technicality can justify a mistrial or retrial and something this crucial is completely ignored! Diane's youngest son, Jeff, was graduating from high school the Thursday evening following the death of his stepfather on Wednesday. Diane's parents left Missouri that Monday, in route to Diane's home to attend her son's (Jeff) graduation Thursday evening (the day after Chuck died). How could "anyone" believe Diane would choose that day, Sunday, to kill her husband?! Later, Diane and her sons agreed to polygraphs. Diane was told she passed with "flying colours" as did Jeff, but was told Chuckie's was questionable. A page from the "police report" in Diane's Habeas confirms her results. Knowing this, and believing the detectives were targeting Chuckie; Diane knows now, in retrospect, she did a stupid thing; believing her son was innocent, she removed the hard drive from the "family" computer that contained some horror sites he frequently