proyects and specifications. If, when we finish, we are not architects, why the hell is there an architectural school? Why not go back to the mentor/aprentice educational sistem? How does passing an exam make you a better architect? Not by some of the built projects I have seen. Also I guess that there is no such thing as a good non licenced architect, and I am not going to even mention Wright. Those who pass the test want a distinction. Call them registered architects. What if I do not want to become a practicing architect? What if I decide to become a theorist, an educator, and get a doctorate? I cannot call myself an architect? Guess almost all the colleges out there are lying about their curriculum. May be we could penalize them for false advertizement? I have commented on this situation before and it is time for me to comment again. Within the architectural profession itself there is no common definition of what intern means. I have wasted much time and money sending resume's and portfolios in answer to want ads for 'Intern' architect and having the firms personnel office tell me I do not qualify because I have too much experience and already have my professional degree. This is quite common for the joint Architecture/Engineering firms as the Intern definition is carried over from the engineering section. On the other hand even with several years of experience and an MArch, B.S., A.S. and A.A.S. I am told by