idea, which I submit to your lucid examination. It is meant as an alternative (and parallel) program to the essay contests. I will sketch it, and if I will receive positive feedback, I will detail it. I think that any new theory, or idea of theory, can be divided, for a purpose that will become clear further, in three parts. (1) One is logical, and if possible, mathematical, consisting in fundamental principles and definitions, and logical derivation of consequences. This can be considered pure logic and mathematics. (2) The second is rather philosophical, consisting in supporting, with arguments, the basic principles of the first one. This is more speculative, consisting in arguments rather than proofs. But the fundamental principles/axioms need this sort of support. (3) The third consists in matching the consequences developed in (1) to the observations. It contains both explanation of the already observed phenomena, and predictions. Imagine now a website (think at something very useful and huge, like Wikipedia and Arxiv). Imagine that this website contains pages on which everybody, amateur or professional scientist, can post his/her theories. Each basic principle/axiom (2) can have pages containing arguments and counterarguments. Other pages may contain proofs (1), to which everybody can add corrections, spot flaws, and present counterexamples. Each proof can have additional versions, containing the newly added corrections. Each such proof will have a status, one of the following: *unverified*, *validated*, *invalidated*, *incomplete*, and others, if needed. (3) Each prediction will have a page where we can compare