wilful dissemination of disinformation? They tell us they are the custodians of democratic rights. Pull the other one. Gollygosh: 14 Jun 2012 7:40:26am You are so right RRRAR, thank you for expressing my thoughts (and I am sure those of so many others) so succinctly. I have just written my second complaint to the ABC re Q & A, and the fact that we watch such programs in the hope of hearing information so we can make our own judgements, rather than watching public figures being demeaned, and being attacked with rehashed old news. The response to my first complaint was in a nutshell: I was wrong and they were ok. Time for all likeminded people to stand up and be counted, I feel How about it, Drummers? Robert: Gollygosh: 14 Jun 2012 10:25:58am Specifically two interviews with the PM, the first where Tony Jones asked questions and then answered them himself and was unpardonably rude. The second on Q & A the other evening, although admittedly the PM gave as good as she got in a composed and polite way. Time was ABC interviewers had a conversation rather than an interrogation. More information came to light that way, and it was possible to assess the character of the guest. Adversorial interviewing is unpleasant to watch and does not inform the viewer. It does rouse some in the community to display the less attractive side of the Australian public. I would not even wish equal Q & A time for