too surprising given the respondent??s backgrounds. Results of the survey should be viewed accordingly. 4. Please provide the approximate date (month and year) when implementation of this technique started. 5. Please provide the approximate date (month and year) when implementation of this technique ended. These two items were intended to identify programs that had been in operation for sufficient time to allow "before-and-after" studies. Of special interest to the researchers was the identification of programs that were up and running and had been monitored prior to recent public interest in road rage. This would allow for some evaluation of the effects of this interest. Interestingly, only one program has been in operation since prior to 1997: the City of Falls Church, Virginia began its program in 1994. All respondents to this question reported their programs as currently in operation. 6. How widely was this technique implemented? The question was intended to discern whether responses to the question regarding the location of incidents, were likely to be influenced by the scale of program implementation. For example, if all respondents had reported state and regional efforts, it is more likely that incidents would have been reported on interstate highways than on local roads. The following breakdown, however, reflects a more even distribution of responses. Still, it should be noted that the surveys were sent to organizations in the 50 largest metropolitan areas, which may have influenced the responses regarding location and roadway type in both this survey and its successor on incident