is "lesser" in word only, not deed.  It is at this point that not-voting to make a statement becomes a viable option. We have had lots of politicians like Romney, men who were "almost 100% pro-life".  None of them have done anything significant to help the unborn.  Why are we falling for it again? Posted by Jonathan Darnel on 2012-08-28 22:58:18 Let's see...mother's health, life, etc.  Quality of life, mental health, what else?  If you truly believed that telling a little lie would save the world from utter destruction, would you do it?  What is the Catholic answer to this question?  Think about it! Posted by tima0513 on 2012-08-28 22:28:17 If we keep voting for the lesser of two evils, then evil will never leave the white house. We will never see any quality candidates because the party leaders know we will vote for someone even if they are terrible. Posted by Timmehh on 2012-08-28 22:20:24 Just so we're under no illusions about who we're dealing with here, below is an example of pro-life Romney at work. The truth is that, basically, there is no difference between Obama and Romney on abortion, and we all know that Obama's position on abortion is directly reflected in Obamacare to the extreme of trashing the freedom of religion rights of those people of faith guaranteed them under The Constitution who cannot, moreover, must not, support that moral atrocity which is anathema to their faith. From the detailed research done on Romney's purported pro-life