the government has consulted with 'experts' to determine what the prescribed behaviors should be. What could be wrong with that? .............Oh I know - "When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing; when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors; when you see that men get rich more easily by graft than by work, and your laws no longer protect you against them, but protect them against you... you may know that your society is doomed." -Ayn Rand. This is what happens when the activist base of a party becomes so unrepresentative of the country. I was a witness to, and on the receiving end of, how the Clark led Labour party dealt with the right faction that had supported Rogernomics -- in simple words we were driven out of the party. I remember the very last Labour Party meeting I ever attended. I was an LEC delegate on the Regional Council for the Canterbury region. A meeting held in a musty hall in St Albans was debating what to do with the a very profitable boarding house that the LRC owned in central Christchurch. It was in fact pretty much the sole source of income for the party outside of dues. I came from Mike Moore's electorate -- one that always paid its full dues on time in fact often we'd pay 3 years worth of dues in one go.