have referred to a number of Strasburg decisions from time to time but have not even come close to adopting the approach taken in France.  But the question of where does one's zone of privacy extend, the public's right to know and what other factors are involved is a perennial and universal one.  It is and always will be a matter of balance. Damien Carrick : But isn't the point that maybe we have the balance better here than in places like France, where maybe they have legislation? Michael Rivette : I think, quite frankly, that the media is sometimes taking an approach that might be cutting off your nose to spite your face, to be quite honest. And why I feel this, is because once things are defined with a clear right of privacy, which we know is already there in the law but expressed under breach of confidence, and...but it must be balanced against the freedom of expression, once we...that's enshrined, then it focuses people's attention on what the balance is. Peter Bartlett : The problem is, it is set in stone, and the courts will look at the actual wording of the statutory provision and in 10, 20, 30 years' time, our views on privacy, our views on freedom of expression could well be significantly different, Wrong.  Section 52 of the Trade Practices Act is a simple uncluttered provision which has been subject to considerable judicial consideration.  The jurisprudence has developed successfully over time and it has