of that is any reason to even begin to suspect that our primitive energy sources are wrecking our planet... [end sarcasm....] It was a fine sarcastic comment. Than you. I need to remember to put [end sarcasm....] on some of my comments. Some people don't have a sense of humor. Of course, if you are really a following of the Fox Noise Party, you comment was right on the money and your [end sarcasm...] at the end of your comment is just an evil HP conspiracy to silence the righteous. Loading comments... Yet one must be somewhat awed by their persistence of blind belief in the face of all empirical evidence and hundreds of years of established scientific knowledge. And one can understand the ever rising shrillness of the protestations and epithets as the evidence mounts and even the most stalwart champions of the cause admit that 1) it is in fact warming, 2) that CO2 is in fact a greenhouse gas, 3) that we humans are in fact responsible for the increasing level of CO2 in the atmosphere, 4) the grudging admission that rise is in fact causing at least part of the warming, and most recently, 5) the paper co-authored by none other than the Surface Stations Project's own Anthony Watts that found that there is no net urban heat island bias in the temperature record, it having already been accounted for in the analysis of the data, just as has been pointed out from the outset. With