and see the direct application of discriminatory thoughts and generalisations. That shouldn't be happening, no matter the purpose. The fact that by pointing out the inherent hypocrisy of the article results in people being told they "dont get it" or that "of course you'd say that" is terrible. What this then generates I'd a scenario where if you do not agree completely and utterly with the flawed argument, you are cast as compromised, rather than the flaws being acknowledged and rectified. It is unfortunate that s deliberately broad brush has been used for "white" and I feel that needs to change. These arguments are becoming ever more discrete in target, and that tiny grouping is then used to represent a whole that is much, much smaller than reality. It's extremely disingenuous - and again, calling this out is net with derision and discarded. In short, we should not be dealing with "I'm right because I am; if you disagree at all you are not only wrong, you do not understand the topic" its an excellent metaphor, where it falls down is the gamer instinct g to seeka win . you don't win at life, you just bust a gut and try to enjoy yourself. the big take away from the article is that the hurdles before you are lower as a swm. and if you're denying that, you need to meet more varied people But that sort of stereotyping is exactly the definition of racism. If this article is to