pay he LVT, only the landowner. "3. You are saying that the landlord will eat the price of the LVT" He will. He also pays no Income or Sales tax either. "He can't. He literally can't afford to. He will pass it on, at a 1:1 value." Under full LVT the landlord pays no Income or Sales taxes. He can't pass LVT on to the tenant as that implies he was charging under the market rate before LVT, which they do not. If he attempts to pass it on market forces come into play and people will move to another cheaper place to live, then he has to keep the rent as it was. LVT will move housing more over to the private owner/occupier sector. JohnLVT What your warped analysis gave was quite the opposite what happened in Harrisburg. You are guessing. The points I gave came from the mayor of Harrisburg out of real world experience. It is best you attempt to understand LVT -- all you are doing is making yourself look foolish. JohnLVT Mark I have just concluded that in my last post. I think he thinks he knows all the answers. He is totally closed to anything his brain is pre-geared to. Sad I know. ttp://profiles.google.com/gmwadsworth Mark Wadsworth "I am pointing out that if you make it economically efficient for people to live in two adjoining houses to keep the "household" income down and minimise tax, then many middle class people will do so!" ??? You've