BC is what it is -- a 1-3 team This time there were no excuses. No fumbles inside the Red Zone. No "what ifs", "if onlys ". The bottom line for Boston College on Saturday afternoon at Alumni Stadium was simple. The Eagles weren't good enough to beat Clemson. Aren't good enough. That is not a mystery. Clemson is more talented and forget about the two second half picks thrown by BC QB Chase Rettig. They were as much the result of good plays by the Clemson DB's as bad throws by Rettig. BC knew it before the game and they certainly knew it after the Tigers pulled away from a 24-21 halftime lead, built the margin to 38-21 and then held off a fourth quarter Eagle surge to post a  45-31 victory. The Eagles didn't have to play a perfect game against Clemson to win, but it would have helped. They didn't. The Eagles could have used some "Clemson moments" -- times when the Tigers play well below their level of talent both physically and mentally. Those happened in the second half, but there weren't enough of them. So what does this all mean in the grand scheme of a BC season in which Coach Frank Spaziani hoped that his team would be, at worst, 3-1 going into October? That would have quieted, but not silenced, the growing chorus of voices at BC that it is time for a coaching change. It doesn't matter a bit, of course, that