court proceedings.  Over half were under 25. Typically, this group do not identify themselves as having a 'problem with alcohol' and would be unlikely to seek out alcohol treatment or education of their own accord.  The program evaluation shows that over 90 per cent of participants increased their knowledge of alcohol-related harms and understanding of relevant harm reduction strategies. This translates into more informed decisions about future drinking and a reduced future incidence of alcohol-related offending.  Everybody wins. While attention needs to be paid to the price and availability of alcohol in Australia, we need a greater emphasis on approaches that engage with risky drinkers and the behaviour associated with drinking. The value of Diversion programs is well-recognised, as is prevalence of alcohol-related offences within the Justice system.  To reduce the harmful effects of alcohol misuse on individuals and families within our community, reduce future need for alcohol and other drug treatment, and reduce the burden on our Justice system, we need to introduce an alcohol Diversion structure, as currently exists for illicit drugs. As with other Diversion programs, Alcohol: Considering Change? provides a unique opportunity to engage a new demographic and reduce the potential escalation of alcohol-related harms.  If funding is allocated for alcohol Diversion, our Alcohol: Considering Change? program provides a readily adaptable model that can be implemented in a range of settings. Actually strayan, ReGen has been running the program for four years with no funding. We're hardly in it for the money. What we're arguing is