events on the ground. Just for instance, the choice by the U.S.A. to attack Afghanistan (2001) was part of a global, non-specific, policy of aggression to assure U.S. dominance. To legitimate that aggression and others to follow anywhere, a suitable propaganda title was created :  "the war on terror" into which the U.S. aggression in Afghanistan could fit. Repeated and repeated, the meaningless phrase has taken on a quality of reality in the minds of a huge population which has become willing to support any U.S. aggression undertaken in that name. The Canadian government admitted the reality of the phrase when it joined the NATO force -- the International Security Assistance Force -- and set Canadian soldiers to fighting (2002) in Afghanistan under its imperial controller -- the U.S.A. Nevertheless, many, many Canadians have always doubted the correctness of being in Afghanistan, revealing often more than half of polled numbers reject Canadian military presence there. The statistics of polling, in fact, appear to back the idea presented here. The huge surge of sympathy for the U.S. when the towers in New York fell with many accompanying deaths on September 11, 2001, was quickly translated into support of a battle for "the cause" in Afghanistan. In the first year, captured by the propaganda campaign for the aggressions -- first called "Operation Infinite Justice" and then "Operation Enduring Freedom", the Canadians polled supported to almost seventy-five percent. But as time passed, the propaganda campaign met the reality Canadians saw day to day.