some studies. It's impossible to say how much US women under report rape in terms of alerting authorities or in anonymous surveys. However, one thing that is analogous is that both US men and Japanese women are 50 years behind US women in getting rape awareness and "no means no" *targeted at them* being talked about. So, if cultural circumstances exist for Japanese women to be *much* more likely to under report rape (compared to US women)even on anonymous surveys why wouldn't that also be the case for men considering rape awareness *targeted at men*(from hetero sex w/women) is VIRTUALLY NONEXISTENT! It just may *now* be blooming on sights like the good men project and genderratic. I would say this one *now* but I haven't seen anybody give a terribly large shit about male rape victims. As I said, this is the first time "made to penetrate" was included in the cdc's sexual study. New studies may reveal more. I contest that the 12 month is more reliable for the reasons I posted. When you add together the lifetime figures from the CDC report of men being penetratively raped 1 in 71 and being "made to penetrate" 1 in 21, that comes out to 1 in 16 chance in being raped (by somebody of any sex). One in 16 is a hell of a lot closer to women's 1 in 5, than 1 in 71 that was shown in previous CDC studies that didn't cover made to penetrate. That means