was pro-choice before he was "pro-life," and aside from nominating justices for SCOTUS presidents don't have much power to end elective abortions anyway; and in the unlikely event that Roe-Wade would be overturned (a long shot) elective abortions will still take place. We've already seen Ryan flip-flop over elective abortion in the case of rape and incest (vice presidential debate). So, just as LFN inflates and exaggerates the President's record on choice, the "pro-life" rhetoric of Romney and Ryan isn't to be trusted. Frankly, yes I do want to see President Obama nominate the next two supreme court justices. The court needs to be brought back to the center. Citizens United was a devastating blow to democracy, and without a truly democratic system of government it is unlikely that the dignity of human life will enjoy any greater degree of recognition in our society. I respectfully reject the logic inherent in single issue voting, particularly when advocates of an issue which on the face would tend to be preferable cannot be trusted to tell the truth. To Timothy Ephesus: Colin Donovan and Father Mitch Pacwa, had a whole program last week on the very point you are addressing. Basically, they did a very nice job addressing the many concerns of Catholics who are considering not voting, and also related answers to the current election. Father Pacwa made the statement that if a Catholic does not vote, and an unworthy candidate is elected, it would constitute a mortal sin! I was