in where or how the money is invested...We do not want farms that produce at the edge of the envelope: no matter what the season or the weather producing food to their maximum capacity and without regard to what that means in terms of soil fatigue, animal welfare, bio diversity, disease resilience, and frankly sheer enjoyment of the countryside. In the end a farm run at the edge of the envelope will die of exhaustion. We do not want that in farming. We should not want that in investing... Bi-productive investment, by contrast, intentionally seeks to be productive twice - for the investor at one end of the investment chain, and for the company and its other stakeholders at the other end. The heroes (of investment management) might no longer be mathematicians and nuclear physicists who can construct ever more intricate trading strategies. They might become social and environmental experts who can best advice how to channel private sector finance for the benefit of both society and investors. (...) Significantly, moving towards bi-productive investment would re-connect investors with their investments, and perhaps this would be the most profound change of all. Our current investment arrangements mean that we are disconnected from where the money is invested. Few of us could name the top 10 companies in which our savings and pensions are invested. With that level of knowledge it is no wonder that we do not care what the companies do with our money, how they treat their staff, or