entity be Please provide evidence for this unsupported assertion. Quote: 5. This entity is not subject to time otherwise it "wasn't" and "nothingness" (try to understand that, if it wasn't then nothingness would be although I cannot say that because being is not nothingness but this is the only way I can describe it in language. The universe simply wouldn't be.) Please provide evidence for your unsupported assertion. On a side note, how can anything be, do or cause anything when being, doing and causing anything requires time? Quote: 6. Time therefore initiated from this entity Another non sequitur based on an unsupported assertion. Quote: This Entity and Man (is man the highest intelligence?) At this point you have yet to present any evidence for the existence of this asserted enity. Whilst, the question of man as the highest intelligence is an interesting question on a cosmological scale, the answer is clearly a definite positive against any non-existent entities. Quote: 1. An apple is an apple before man knows about the apple. An island is an island before man knows about the island. If the apple and the island weren't what they were and if they didn't exist, then how can man come to know of them? We know of many non-existent things / beings via legend, mythology and fictional works. We are extremely creative beings and have a history of creating non-existent things and beings. Quote: 2. Apply this logic to knowledge. When man discovers something, say a cure