fired, or banned from NatGeo/SCiblogs. I feel somewhat bad for reed, but she supported the hell out of the crap the FC5 pulled against people she felt were "bad". Well, that's the problem when you start supporting fair game tactics against people. At some point, someone is going to pull that shit against you, if nothing else, just to prove they can. She enjoyed that shit, or stood by silently and supported it that way while it was directed at "others'. When it came home to her, now it's a problem. Well, yes it is. Before you start a fight, ask yourself how fine you are with being hit back. Offer links to these complaints. You guys have a long history of misunderstanding and misrepresenting people's positions. Offer some evidence of your complaints and let's see if they're similar to what happened here. You have to be smart enough to realize what an awesomely shitty reply that is. I can tell what evidence is guaranteed to be unconvincing, the evidence you've supplied: no evidence. I think you are very bad at reading and understanding things in the rare instances when you're not intentionally misrepresenting people's positions. I will therefore not believe your Cliff's notes version of any given event unless you can supply a link -- note that evidence of that sort is very, very easy to come by if you're not full of shit. The fact that you won't is a good indication that you really don't have any,