about anybody who didn't see things that way. That's a huge red flag for me. But at the very least, putting misogyny over sexism is terrible awful framing. Misogyny is a subset of sexism, but sexism overall is the problem. I think it's MORE accurate, but I usually prefer to stick to the descriptions of ideas, behaviours, and institutions rather than people. "Bob's attitude is generally misogynistic" might be true of Bob, regardless of how much he totes respects wimminz. I can't believe that linked piece equates being the target of bigotry with BEING A FUCKING BIGOT. As if bigots are somehow a marginalized, oppressed group of people. And that oppression is due to immutable personal traits, like race? is she saying bigotry is just part of a man's genetic make up so we have to tolerate them? what planet does this person live on? Or was the pay check good enough to straight up lie? It's straightforward moral nihilism. Absent an objective criterion that says "X is right" then any viewpoint is as true as its reverse. Thus, a oppressor can claim that stopping their oppression is, itself, oppression. Most kids make this philosophical great leap forward at around age 14, and some never outgrow it. I love the view that people cannot be misogynist or racist only their behaviours and actions. It makes so much sense and is a much more optimistic view than that of someone being an inveterate racist or woman hater when in all likelihood