laws of physics, logic, ballistics, etc. That's a given. The official propaganda about 9/11 is every bit as accurate as the Warren Commission Report: fantasy for fools. ttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=5\\... Jaden Morgan I hear ya, because I never drank the koolaid either. ttp://www.facebook.com/silzcarson1 Steven Evan Silz-Carson Must have been "dark energy." Oh, wait, that a repulsive force accelerating the expansion of space-time. How about a black hole generated beneath the WTC? Yeah, that would work! ttp://www.facebook.com/silzcarson1 Steven Evan Silz-Carson Must have been "dark energy." Oh, wait, that a repulsive force accelerating the expansion of space-time. How about a black hole generated beneath the WTC? Yeah, that would work! Kurt Story I don't find the blueprints that compelling. The appearance is far too digitally uniform for an era when blueprints were hand-drawn. Then, there is a real lack of functional details -- where is the engine to spin an outer disk -- and against what force? If the outer ring is spinning, how is the center stablized -- ie, keep the pilot facing forward? How does the pilot see what's below or on the ground to maneuver or land? There's too much cross-section on the leading edges to keep the airframe from melting at Mach 3-4 in the atmosphere, ie anywhere low enough to be seen. Copare leading edges to those on the SR-71 ttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=5\\... Jaden Morgan "If flying saucers were somehow faster or more efficient or capable of lifting heavier loads, we would almost certainly see them in a commercial setting." LOL!