I wouldn't. It is so not a choice. Sophias_Favorite There is no discrimination, other than the kind of discrimination that distinguishes food and dirt, in saying that marriage must involve two sexes. Also, calling male and female "genders" is not only inaccurate -- those are sexes, "gender" refers to a linguistic category -- it's also Eurocentric. In Navajo there are thirteen genders, and none of them has anything to do with male or female -- also they inflect the verbs having to do with motion, not nouns or adjectives. The Bantu languages often have over ten genders, again none of which has to do with the sexes. The two genders in many of the modern Indic and Finno-Ugraic languages, as well as in the extinct Anatolian and I believe Tocharian languages, are "animate" and "inanimate" -- marrying a fellow member of those genders is considered normal, at least till people start demanding the sacred "human right" to take their blowup dolls as spouses. Say that can't happen? There are already otaku asking to marry fictional characters in Japan, 3D. agansister Good god, SF, who are you trying to impress? I'm so not impressed. Since I'm not Navajo, or speak Bantu, etc. I'll stick with male & female genders. And sometimes the same gender (sex if you will) is attracted to the same one they are. Sticking with a gay person is born the the way they are just like a heterosexual is born the way they are. Working on your