had been stripped of every fixture and fitting and was down to the basics of the building. I have already mentioned this to you yet you bring up the same point. As a scientist i would have thought you would have done some research, or are you the kind of scientist who needs others to hold your hand through your research. Comment number 69. Occams razor does not apply to human affairs, all things being equal is the important part, it is good for understanding things in nature but not so good when dealing with human affairs. but again this is 14th centuary concept that has been argued about for the last 600 years by very clever people who have both agreed and disagreed with it. I think einstien was one of the many who disagreed with it. All in all though it has nothing to do with 9/11 though. and again if you don't care, why are you here reading and commenting like the bad debunker you are. The BBC told you was Osama, your happy with that. Go back to your life. Comment number 73. thanks for the reply. sorry my message was a short of shorthand for a discussion that has come up previously. we were discussing: snip: ""Freefall speed: NIST didn't even apply high school maths to show rate of accleration of building collapse really was Free Fall!!! (9.81mss)" Lets just look at that one specific 'fact' 9.8 m/s/s is an object accelerating freely in a