and determine its validity or shortcomings. If it is thrown out wholesale, the courts that rely heavily on human testimony could get nowhere. And there is nothing neat about the events of 9/11, or attempts to understand the sanitized, and very "neat" official conspiracy that 19 rank amateurs flew the some of the most sophisticated aviation technology in existence with the precision of highly trained professionals. Hani Hanjour was said to have dropped from 7000 ft in a tight 270 degree spiral at speeds around 400 to 500 mph, pulling 4, 5, 6 G's in doing so, and yet his flight instructor refused to fly in a single engine Cessna because he was so bad a pilot. And the Kean Report, the 9/11 Commission report, said he was "one of the best pilots they had." What is "neat" about that? Comment number 26. Whether it was Islamic fundamentalists seeking to strike at the heart of Western Capitalism, covert US Governmental agencies conspiring to control the world's oil supplies, covert Israeli operatives using a group of Islamic patsies to turn the West against the Arab World, or little green spacemen from Planet Chug-A-Lug 5 seeking to take over the planet - it remains the case, one way or another, there WAS a conspiracy. It'd be nice, though, if the tone of the debate could be raised a little on all sides: yes, their shrieks against you are on the shrill side, but you're hardly better referring to them as 'truthers' -