on SBS. It has some interesting results that highlight the ambiguity Simon Webb talks about. I'm pleased to see that there is a distinction between being concerned about immigration and being racist -- these are often muddled, especially by people who like to throw in the term "dog-whistling". It's a topic that the government has not wanted to talk about since at least the early 1990s. Many have forgotten that One Nation partly rose because simple questions were asked by the media: why were European migrants having trouble getting to Australia? Why were Middle Eastern and Asian migrants finding it easier to migrate to Australia? Was there an official government or departmental policy? Who was responsible for the policy? These questions were never answered. If they had been answered honestly, the Australian community (migrant and longer-dwelling migrant) might have been more willing to embrace a new migration mix. Also, I think we must stop the simplistic mantras of: "Vietnamese refugees were accepted with open arms". They weren't necessarily. "Italians gave us great food". Yep, and Donald MacKay's murder because of his opposition to the drug trade. "We have great Asian restaurants". We have a takeover of the selective schooling system in NSW. I'm not singling out these groups to make racist claims, but I am saying that if we are talking about benefits of multiculturalism, then let's be honest about the downside, and we might be able to solve some of the problems. We could start by having Anglos admit