to judgement in the Duke case is like the rush here. Because Martin is dead does not mean that he is the Victim. He appears to have been involved in thefts or burglaries in the past (which was unknown by Zimmerman). He was out and about in a gated community looking at, or in, homes and vehicles and spotted by a neighborhood watch member. Worth watching? Yep. Justifying his death? Nope. Martin appears to have been the aggressor, based on injuries and the sole witness statement explaining Zimmerman resorting to deadly force. Sorry, but if all that is correct, I just don't see a crime. Stupidity yes, but a crime, no. Bottom line, there needs to be more known. But; what is known does appear to agree with what Zimmerman says happened. no, its painfully obvious. i swear to god, people seem to think every black male teenager from an inner city is a criminal, and thus deserves to be killed. it hark backs to bill o'reilly's comment in 2007 or so which the left twisted to hurt him -- his point was that his grandmother had never met a black person, so she was horribly afraid of them. if she had met black people, she might not have been racist. MILOWENT: "He appears to have been involved in thefts or burglaries in the past" -- where is the evidence of that? also, don't forget the eyewitness who said zimmerman was walking around with his hands on his head after