notion seems hard to reconcile with what we have found in Eusebius regarding the church's acceptance of apostolic writings in earlier centuries." (Lee Martin McDonald, James A. Sanders, Editors: The Canon Debate; Everett R. Kalin, The New Testament Canon of Eusebius, p 404, 2002) Problem is that the record of Eusebius, is restricted to that small part of the world where he had influence: Caesarea. He may not represent Asia, Constantinople, Alexandria or Rome! For a complete picture of the time, we need the views of key men in all these areas. It is well documented that different areas of the world had differing views on various New Testament books. This does not mean that Canon was not set. But some parts of the world accepted Revelation and others viewed it with suspicion. It is clear that in some parts of the world, the entire 27 book canon of scripture was likely fixed in its present state.