campaigns you would do better to add your weight to), then I'd urge you to choose one or the other. In my work as tutor/mentor I constantly witness dynamic range compression and data compression being confused. I was even at a seminar with some industry 'names' last year where a questioner and the respondant were discussing these two completely differing subjects for several minutes, neither able to comprehend the other! Lumping the two together in your campaign is only likely to add further to the confusion. I want to see the end of data compression for audio, but do we need 24-bit consumer audio? I'm unconvinced. As to the loudness wars... I'm right behind you right up to the point where my refusing to hit that limiter means I lose the job. I can educate, but I can't dictate. I wonder when the petition against people recording and mixing who have not got the foggiest will start up ? Arguably of greater consequence than heavy limiting. Just a tongue in cheek thought. You can moan about anything ultimately but by and large perspective is a good thing and case by case is the way forward, no blanket statements/approaches because they usually have little relevance to any individual piece of music/job. Quote SafeandSound Mastering: I wonder when the petition against people recording and mixing who have not got the foggiest will start up ? Arguably of greater consequence than heavy limiting. Just a tongue in cheek thought. Probably when people start