little shaped by this -- by the fact that I work at CNN and occasionally on the Lou Dobbs program. (Laughter.) And there is a lot of hostility in the political world to the notion of international organizations and a bunch of bureaucrats in fill-in-the-country, Brussels, U.N., whatever, telling us what to do. How, as a senior administration official who appeared in public all the time on these issues, how did you deal with that? BELLINGER: Well, that is frustrating, and that is, in fact, a underlying current, I think, in the United States that we just have to deal with, Republican and Democratic. I think -- I do think you're right. Sadly, the Republican Party, that strand of liberal Republican internationalism seems to have been sort of stamped out, particularly in the Senate. But nonetheless, there is in those parties all across the country this suspicion of international law, of international institutions. It was very difficult for me as the legal adviser to try to stick up for these issues. We need to do more education of why international law -- not every treaty, not all across the board, so you can't generalize -- which I am rapidly generalizing. But there is unfortunately a general hostility to international law, when it needs to be more understood of how particular treaties are in our interest. To respond quickly to David's point, actually, contrary to the image of our administration, we pushed through more treaties in the 110th Congress -- 90