of 9/11. A dodgy inquiry says it was a 'man in a cave' yet some us fight fo the truth, suffering abuse and detriment for even daring to question. I wonder if we will get our day in court. Both stories even have a solicitor general in them, Although one fought for truth and the other lied about recieving a phonecall from his wife. Comment number 75. "67. At 10:24am on 22 Oct 2008, virginiatroy wrote: Has no-one read or seen The Winslow Boy? You can only be sure that the truth is being told if there are ambiguities, inconsistencies, even incoherency in the story. These are what conspiracy theorists thrive on, thereby demonstrating that their understanding of human nature is risible. If they want things neat they should spend their time reading crime novels. The real world's a mess." I can stand for a certain level of coincidence and ambiguity. But for 9/11 there is just sooooo much. And what's worse, there has been NO attempt to clear up. No standard forsenic analysis of the fires. No air crash investigations. and NIST's explantions of the WTC collapses has been wordy, but woefully inadequate. All three collapses basically say fires hotter than anything previously seen before in an office fire, poor design of buildings and unique, spontaneously collapses. If you get a magician to conjure this event you would believe fakery but somehow if politicans do, then that is all right for some reason? Sorry does not compute. Comment number