who cares if it's original or not? As for unoriginal, I would REALLY love it if he made a movie of the Wheel of Time or Sword of Truth series, though either or both of those would be HUGE undertakings. Am I the only one to see that Jackson didn't put all adaptations and remakes in the same basket? He talked two or three times specifically about "those that are based on TV shows that weren't good to begin with". It's true that "Transformers" and "G.I. Joe" were shit shows in the 80s, and the movies are just as shitty! So he's right. He also said that some stories, such as "Frankenstein" and "Alice In Wonderland", are expected to be remade every twenty years, because they're timeless, they're in a class of their own, they're important in literary and film history. And "King Kong" belongs in that category: it's cinema's greatest myth ever! And "The Lord Of The Rings" is a goddamn masterpiece, so shut up all those who don't know what the hell you're talking about! This Peter Guy is a fake because the film he boasts as a 'strange, weird film' [district 9] is a 10000000000 times remade cliche concept of alien invasion and watching it was such a bore that you will hate the medium of films itself. There was no originality or creativity in that film. Even the makers couldn't make a alien creature that's different from the 'Alien','Predator' and other 100 films which deals with