collective challenge to the ?HIV equals AIDS equals death? paradigm been given more publicity? These are credentialed people, and there certainly is, as this book shows, reasonableness to their claims.? ?I myself have had three patients with advanced AIDS and substantially debilitated health who then undertook various natural protocols and improved their overall immune function significantly. So why wouldn?t I want to explore alternative approaches to this condition? Why wouldn?t I want to review as many scientific references as possible that support these approaches? I am happy to have a book on hand that goes beyond the party line of those who run the war on AIDS, looks at alternative perspectives, and provides extensive documentation to support them. ?Furthermore, I plan to make this book required reading for all of the persons I counsel with AIDS-defining illnesses. And I would recommend it to every concerned and conscientious physician, nurse, and public health advocate in the country.? Review of ?Aids, A Second Opinion,? Amazon.com, June 18, 2002 ? Dr. Martin Feldman , MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Neurology at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, graduate of Columbia University?s College of Physicians and Surgeons, author of more than 50 articles published in peer-reviewed medical journals ?An intrinsic cytopathic [cell-harming] effect of the virus is no longer credible.? Nature, 12 Jan 1995 ?...HIV is behaving more and more like a virus, without frills or special effects.? ? Dr. Simon Wain-Hobson , Pasteur Institute, Paris ?HIV=AIDS=DEATH is a gross error. The medical