right to educate a child in a school of the parents' choice -- whether public or private or parochial -- is also not mentioned. Nor is the right to study any particular subject or any foreign language. Yet the First Amendment has been construed to include certain of those rights. By Pierce v. Society of Sisters, supra, the right to educate one's children as one chooses is made applicable to the States by the force of the First and Fourteenth Amendment s. By Meyer v. Nebraska, supra, the same dignity is given the right to study the German language in a private school. In other words, the State may not, consistently with the spirit of the First Amendment , contract the spectrum of available knowledge. The right of freedom of speech and press includes not only the right to utter or to print, but the right to distribute, the right to receive, the right to read ( Martin v. Struthers, 319 U.S. 141 , 143) and freedom of inquiry, freedom of thought, and freedom to teach ( see Wiemann v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 195) -- indeed, the freedom of the entire university community. Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 , 249-250, 261-263; Barenblatt v. United States, 360 U.S. 109 , 112; Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 , 369. Without [p483] those peripheral rights, the specific rights would be less secure. And so we reaffirm the principle of the Pierce and the Meyer cases. In NAACP v.