The other three islands, Saba, St. Eustatius and Bonaire, became partially integrated into the Dutch Kingdom by the same process, but without the level of political or economic rights required for full political equality under U.N. principles. The main point, though, is that all of these were de-listed before 1960. Had they been reviewed after 1960 based on the updated definition of self-government adopted at that time -- and considering the broader and more diverse U.N. membership - a case could have been made for  a self-governance reassessment and possible re-listing. A number of these 'dependencies in the periphery' are focusing some attention on that now since democratic deficits in the political arrangements are becoming more and more evident, and are impacting their development process. CAR Shouldn't these issues be addressed in the Decolonization Committee? Isn't this where these discussions should take place? CGC Well, the General Assembly has made it clear that the Decolonization Committee can only address territories formally listed by the Assembly as non self-governing. The notable exception is the unique case of Puerto Rico by special decision, and where a committee-only decision is adopted ---- CAR Committee-only resolution? CGC Yes. Again, unlike the other resolutions adopted by the committee, the one on Puerto Rico is not sent to the Fourth Committee for action - even though it is contained in the Decolonization Committee report ---- CAR It appears that the territories which are not listed have a challenge in getting the U.N. to review their status.