are unworkable. It will be like the Greater Bristol Bus fiasco. Millions of pounds to reduce bus times by 45 seconds and increase congestion by putting bus stops out in the road so that all traffic stops when the bus stops or people make dangerous overtaking manouvers on the worng side of the road!! I support the proposal, but feel that without proper enforcement the lowering of the speed limit will be ineffective. I live in an area of the city that already has a 20mph limit imposed on residential areas. Since the introduction of the reduced speed limit I have seen little or no change in the behaviour of drivers, and little or no evidence of enforcement. On most evenings City Road (BS2) sounds like a drag strip with many drivers (including bus drivers) exceeding the speed limit by a considerable degree, presumably because they know that they probably wont get caught. Unless funds are going to be invested in enforcement it would probably be more cost effective to leave the speed limit at 30mph and invest in more speed bumps, cameras and traffic police. For those who oppose the proposal, consider the evidence regarding survivability of impacts at 20mph in comparison with higher speeds: Also consider that the difference in journey time from one side of the city to the other (roughly 10 miles) would be only around 10 mins at 20mph rather than 30mph. Not an onerous delay considered the potential benefits. Finally, it would appear that