be an issue for the AWG crowd) and cherry picking a start point that give the trend that supports your position. Yeah, well I'm just a fish biologist and reporter with an environmental bog of my own, but I know this is bullshit you two are peddling. When it comes to part time and ex-weather announcers and skepticism of global warming, it seems to go hand in hand. Try this assessment on for size: Amateurs on location are still amateurs. Take a class. Get a clue. Best science blog. LOL! After perusing the diatribes posted here by the owner I can safely say this is the realm of a scientifically ignorant wingnut. Just another conservative nutbag in the death throws of flat-earthdom. It's laughable, if not sad. Ignorance always is. REPLY: Thanks for your illuminating labels and opinion. No comment then on this? I recognize typos Watts. Sometimes belatedly, and technologically uncorrectable. Can you, without formulating a new faux theory? REPLY: I can recognize lots of things, rage for example, in the guise of perfection. -- Anthony FWIW, Anthony, Mark A. York has been banned by Patterico and many other blogs for his "abusive" behavior. Perhaps he would care to take this new opportuity to engage in constructive discussion, instead of destructive trolling and invective? Would a fish biologist care to contribute a site survey for a Montana HCN station? I come back to my previous thought that Dr Steig is responsible for the representation of his work. Both his