They point to the fact that time after time Israel Is singled out for criticism, as seen in the link you provided. Israel gets a whole day in the human rights council. When considering all the human rights violations in the world right now, and considering the fact that no other human rights violator has gotten a whole day for itself (not to mention that most even don't get to be mentioned in a session), and considering the fact that it is not the first time Israel is singled out in this way (this is an understatement) -- all of these points makes the mere concept of dedicating a whole day for Israel an illegitimate move. Moreover, lets consider the "legitimate criticism" itself: "Gaza blockade is an effective genocide" (what genocide? Not to mention that the UN itself concluded the blockade to be legal), "the de facto authority in Gaza do not engage in retaliation" (Oh, that's right, I forgot... they only engage in attacking first... what a joke), "Israel refuse to cooperate with Richard Falk" (remind me who he is? Oh... the one who likes to flirt with anti-Semitism.. I wonder why Israel doesn't want anything to do with him). If you consider these, and other claims raised in that session, as legitimate criticism, then I have to say that you are a blinded extremist in a moderate peacenik cloths. This whole human rights council is a joke, for known reasons, and to think Israel or its advocats can