that gangs of mutually compatible -- which is almost to say cooperating -- genes are favoured in the presence of each other. At no time does this evolution of the 'cooperative gene' violate the fundamental principle of the selfish gene. Chapter 5 develops the idea, using the analogy of a rowing crew, and Chapter 13 takes it further.' Index references maybe, but cooperation is mentioned right there in the introduction to the 30th anniversary edition The problem with all these views based on human nature or genes is that you construct the views you need to support your view of human nature. Dawkins and Haidt finding support for conservative, competitive views, Eric finds support for balance views and no as the previous post suggest we could make a case for cooperative views. The challenge of politics is make the world the way we want it to be. Even if there was rock-solid evidence that our genes predispose us to evil then that just shows we need to work harder to build structures to support the better angels of our nature and limit the evil ones. Donations or Sponsorship are Welcome This blog is maintained by Tristan Ewins. The vast majority of his work has been published here and elsewhere with no return for the writer. While 'getting the message out there' is more important than money, any support that is offered would be welcome. (within ethical constraints) nb: pls notify the webmaster if you donate - so the webmaster is