the province of the media alone. That distorts the debate (as Rivette noted). Damien Carrick : So, it would be Prince Harry with nude shots in Las Vegas or Princess Kate's topless shots in France? Peter Bartlett : They used to say, 'What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas', now they say 'What happens in Vegas stays on Google.' Reporter : Well, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are said to be saddened and disappointed at pictures published by a French gossip magazine showing the Duchess of Cambridge topless. The pictures are said... Reporter : The French photos come just a few weeks after photos of a naked Prince Harry in Las Vegas were published in The Sun newspaper after they went viral on the internet. Peter Bartlett : They are two totally different cases. We've got Prince Harry, reputedly with nothing on in a large gathering, at a party, where people were there and someone took, obviously, took photographs. So, you would not have too much sympathy for him in obtaining injunctions and obtaining damages for the publication of those photographs. Now, the Duchess of Cambridge is totally different situation, because the photographs were taken, they say, some one kilometre away, but where photographs are taken from a long distance away, it is a total breach of privacy, but not in the situation of Prince Harry, where he is in a large party. Damien Carrick : So he had no expectation of privacy? Peter Bartlett : Absolutely. Michael Rivette