result is the failure of good governance and open, transparent government. In the June version of the accepted Community Plan there was this 'action' item: "investigate the feasibility and applicability of introducing a Development Contributions Plan". The 'measure' was stated to be -- " Report provided to council ". This has now completely disappeared from the September version . We ask: who made this decision? When was it made? Where is the 'report' to council? Next there is the subtle change in language. Another of the 'action' items from the June version states "Introduce a Local Law which creates the framework for a Classified Tree Register". The measure is: "Local Law considered by council " The September version has altered this to read: ' Local Law adopted by council" . Whilst not earth shattering in itself, the very fact that  terms can be changed without formal resolution is a concern. Again, who decided and when was the decision reached? Doesn't this in fact pre-empt the entire process of community consultation on the Local Law? We also need to highlight just one of the ludicrous 'progress reports' on vital aspects of planning which totally ignore both 'actions' and 'measures'. Here is an example: Measure -- "Reduce the number of applications being referred to DPC for a decision by trialling a mediation process and report the results to Council . Provide an information video which explains the DPC role and purpose for the benefit of residents involved." The progress reports says: "