farmer is facing a 25,000 or higher bill... Rents cannot be lower than tax. This is quite simple, and what you're ignoring. People cannot afford to make a loss by not passing the tax on! You keep ignoring the published proposals, since evidently you prefer to work in a world of your own imagination. I work in the real world. Newsbot9 Yes yes, you keep claiming that concerns are the same as supporting freeloading landowners, when you're trying to concentrate land ownership with a few. People won't keep loss-making land, as you are claiming they will. JohnLVT LVT encourages maximum use of land which in itself encourages energy efficiency. A block of flats per unit uses far less energy than a detached house. Far less fuel is used in transport as well. LVT and eco are bedfellows. LVT DOES NOT throw million out of their homes. Quite the opposite. It actually encourages homes to be built. Take to ex Mayor Reed of Harrisburg. LVT is a revolutionary solution. It is used all over the world and proven., It is what we used before the Income Tax swindle was pushed onto us. " Far more minor changes such as rent caps and a tax on empty brownfield land and empty property will achieve my aims in housing while council housing is built far more easily." That is fiddling the system as we go along -- fire-fighting. LVT encourages maximum use of land and home building. Council homes need not be an