better read on. Following on from the same place in the TOS: You must ensure you have the rights you need to grant us that permission. In other words, if you put something you legally bought for your personal, non-infringing use, you've just been made a felon, because Dropbox now requires you to grant them worldwide license (including derivatives!), by uploading a file you didn't author (for a personal backup or so you can have access to it on a business trip, say) you've just granted rights to Dropbox that you don't own. But by uploading it, you're representing that you do have the right to grant those rights, therefore you're committing fraud as well as several sorts of infringement. I'm not a lawyer, but I can't see how in the world this will hold up in court -- but I'll tell you one thing: I ain't ever using this bloody service again. And I'll go one further -- with shit like this getting to be de rigeur among clueless tech companies and their equally stupid lawyers, there's no way in hell I'm ever using a cloud-based archiving service that "reserves the right to change the TOS without notice" again. As Tony Sopranno once said: "You can't fight corruption with card tricks -- they use the law to commit crimes." Folks at Dropbox should be ashamed -- and they should probably be sued. You guys at the EFF, are you listening? Addendum: For an explanation of why the wording of