so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp it - in a decade, a century, or a millennium - we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise? How could we have been so stupid?" --John A. Wheeler Please join us at our new MDT forum for further discussions regarding MDT: Please join us at the new MDT forum, for future discussions pertaining to novel postulates and equations representing hitherto unsung aspects of physical reality and foundational questions in physics: ttp://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topi\\... Thanks again to Anthony & FQXI for the MDT forum. We will be hosting an "E pur si muove" dance party there for St. Patrick's day. Lawrence--you write, "The MDT idea is not wrong, as far as I can see. The only thing is that it does not really IMO tell us much we don't already know, There is also some rather nonstandard language involved, where if I understand it right it appears that Dr. E's idea of an expanding space is just a way of describing the timelike region enclosed by a light cone. So my sense is that this is just a somewhat nonstandard way of looking at relativity." For the first time in the history of relativity, change has been woven into the fundamental fabric of spacetime with dx4/dt=ic. And all of a sudden quantum mechanics' characteristic trait of entanglement and nonlocality have been given a physical model. dx4/dt=ic distributes locality, lending quantum mechancis its probabilistic nature. And all of a sudden