applied to all those for whom it was procured. Turretin writes, "It is gratuitous to say that Christ is the Savior of those for whom salvation is indeed acquired, but to whom it is will never be applied." 64 And, as has been demonstrated, the Canon s of Dordt declare that Christ purchased faith for the elect on the cross, and that it is the will of God that faith be conferred upon them (Head II, Article 8). Similarly, Owen summarizes the orthodox position in these words: "Christ did not die for any upon condition, if they do believe , but he died for all God's elect, that they should believe , and believing have eternal life." 65 J. Sufficient for all; effectual for some? The constant refrain of Amyraldianism is that Christ died sufficiently for all, but effectually for some. We do not deny that Christ's atonement, as far as the infinite value of it is concerned, is sufficient to redeem the whole world, but the contention is, what was God's purpose in sending Christ? Alan Clifford makes the following astounding claim, Amyraut's clear commitment to the Canons of Dordt suggests that the Amyraldians are the true 'five point' Calvinists. If anything, the high orthodox may be styled 'four and a half pointers,' since they virtually deny the universal sufficiency of the atonement clearly expressed in the second canon. 66 We have seen that Amyraut was not committed to the Canons of Dordt. Head II, Articles 3-4 do indeed