have been any the wiser. The press didn't care for her, and they most certainly didn't haunt the village, or your mother, armed with nothing more than a deadline and a super zoom lense with which to meet it. Being the future Queen of England, and whipping off your bikini top, 15 miles from the nearest possible camera is not, in any way the same as going out in your underwear, getting fucked off your face and then crying rape the next morning. To say so says more about your attitude to women in general than it does about the women you comment on, so very bloody often. I don't actually think the future Queen of England had much say, if any at all, in how this story was dealt with. I think it might have been left to those who really believe they know best how to deal with this kind of situation. Namely the men. SSx A long lense from a vantage point which saw her sitting on the loo would be OK, James? Or in the shower? Just because she is a 'celeb'. That apart, I see the photos were spread all over a French 'womyn's' magazine, which is where most of these outrageous intrusions go. Female Editors just love this sort of thing. There was a similar 'scandal' last year in Oz where another (non-princess) woman of notoriety who was 'hookin' wiv a footy 'star' had her naked form captured on said dork's phone camera coming