value the profession and the importance of the learning that is still going on beyond school. There is so much to learn about the profession of architecture since it is so detailed and complex that we should let everyone know that learning continues beyond school. It is about time. I can not express the disappointed look I have seen in a clients eyes when I have legally had to tell them I am an "intern". I can tell Monica is the mental picture there. Professionally this just makes the firm look like they are dumping the their job off, no matter the experience of the "intern". I know there should be a declaration as to who is registered vs. who is not. "Resident" Doctors seem to have found a non belittling term. CPAs have added some terms to delineate between someone who is licensed and someone who is not. I do not know the answer, I am just glad there is some discussion on this issue and those at the top are not arrogantly letting things go on just because they always have. I think much of the problem lies in the culture of the office. Much of my disappointment with the title "intern" is the liberties that are taken with employees that are title "by law" an intern. Many times I hear "just get an intern to do it", or "that is an intern's job". I think this goes to the heart of what the article was talking about.