genetic science" and the traditional Christian understanding of Adam and Eve. But even after being so informed, at no point did you take the opportunity to say: "Ayala, Venema, Falk, and Alexander have all made erroneous population genetics calculations. There could have been a single couple, within the past 100,000 years, that was the sole source of all the genes currently existing in the human population." But you sidestepped the biological disagreement. Perhaps you were afraid to take on the biologist-TEs, given your usual deference to them in all matters pertaining to genetics and organic evolution. But whatever the reason, you issued no challenge to their scientific conclusions. You complained that their religious view was unorthodox, while leaving their science unchallenged. Yet, as was clearly explained to you, if their science is correct, the traditional view of Adam and Eve *cannot* be true. If I am wrong, show me passages where, when asked by me here, or by others on BioLogos, you stated unambiguously that Adam and Eve were *the sole genetic parents of the entire human race* -- and therefore, by implication, that the population genetics calculations of Ayala, Alexander, Venema, Falk, etc. were *wrong*. The moment you show me the unambiguous statements from your pen, I will retract my statement about your past views. Until then, I maintain that your agreement with Vincent Torley above constitutes a sudden volte-face. Your comments in 42 indicate that you have not been listening to me with full attention, or else have