uprisings against Qaddafi has been to keep our strictly military footprint there as small as possible. Probably the desire to avoid mission-creeping into another Afghanistan or Iraq is at the root of this hands-off attitude. The Libyan government is friendly, and the bulk of Libyan opinion, so far as it can be determined, seems to be pro-American. So why not rely on friendly Libyan forces, along with military contractors hired by CIA, to provide security? In retrospect, it was not enough, but I think you will find nothing that rises to the level of criminality or treason, however much you may wish it did. No nightmare for the people who are paying attention: just more proof of the massive cover up of this mess that keeps changing, morphing and evolving into one more lie and denial by the administration. They cannot get their own stories straight -- and I have to wonder if some patriots on the inside are doing all they can to silently ensure this is so. Just a hunch on that part. Benghazi and all the other scandals and treasonous activities have to be brought out into the light and all involved stripped of office and held to account under the law. That goes from Emperor Caligula-Obama on down the line. Understand that our nation no longer is governed by, for and of the people; it is now governed by and for and of the unions, radicals, internationalists, globalists and those who wish to turn us into