just how extensive that is we need to decide together. Yes, that sounds reasonable enough -- I fully support the logic behind the 20mph zone in 'bona-fide' residential roads that people use as rat-runs. However, I would say that 99% of people would know to treat these with respect if they are going to use them, I for one am extra observant when faced with narrow streets with cars parked on both sides where pedestrians could suddenly spring out without looking (don't get me started on the responsibility of people crossing the road to look out for their own safety...). Unfortunately, I don't think the spending of 2.3m on road signs will necessarily stop the small minority who drive recklessly down such street anyway from breaking whatever the speed limit is -- however, i am worried about the concentration of usually law-abiding people spending more time looking at their speedometers rather than the road ahead causing more pedestrian/vehicle collisions. What I am worried about about is logic of imposing a 20mph limit on some wider through route type roads away from the city centre (where this scheme makes more sense), that just happen to have housing along them -- near myself, am thinking of examples such as Southmead Road, Knole Lane or Monks Park Avenue. To me, it would seem illogical (apart from maybe on small sections) to '20mph' these, as these are clearly designed for the movement of traffic as a through-route, as opposed to some of the narrower,