had better not mess it up for her. I mean talk about witting law from the branch . Obama argued that this is not a tax and Roberts re-wrote the law saying it is a tax so that he could vote to up hold it. NOT HIS JOB . I will leave the political fallout of all of this to more capable folks, but I want to add one final thought about disappointing Supreme Court decisions. When the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. City of New London that eminent domain could be used in just about any situation the government wished, it felt like a devastating blow to liberty. However, since that decision, nearly every state in the union passed laws aimed at curbing eminent-domain abuse, a result I certainly did not anticipate the day the ruling came down. As my former Texas senator Phil Gramm used to say, no single event is as good or as bad as it may first appear. From NRO. The ink is barely dry on this. Sleep and get up tomorrow ready to do battle for liberty. Benedict Roberts decided how he wanted to vote before he decided the mandate was a tax. farsighted on June 28, 2012 at 8:28 PM Not likely since Scalia's dissent doesn't mention Roberts. Seems this was a last minute change on Roberts' part, and by last minute I mean within last week or so, but prior to Scalia's scathing take down of SB1070, I realize now that