guidelines for the evil regime of [insert bogeyman here] tojustify removing any asylum-seeking dissidents from our embassy in Evilia City...bad move, Billy Nomates. Compounded by the dodgy validity of approving an extradition warrant for questioning (not prosecution) for an offence likely to pull a term of less than 12 months. @Jon said, "No it will not -- the Convention allows for exactly these circumstances under section V, sub section 3 where an individual from a country may be arrested in another countries embassy if a serious offence has taken place." ...er there's been an offence, of sorts, well after the supposed events, after the two ladies involved were pressured by who knows who but we can guess. However, Assange has not been charged with anything OR tried with a crime in his absence, both of which occurrences could and have happened in the past. So are we to read this that anyone can be dragged out of an embassy "for questioning"? Because that's where it is right now. This really is an abomination and the so-called defenders of freedom and justice following WW2, are now to be called the international extra-judiciary torture & execution squad of the USA and UK. David Mills, . Your comment is of course empirical but undeniably serious concerns regarding the lack of safeguards and transparency with which actions are being taken against Julian Assange, and the harassment he is being subjected to which has irreparable effects on his physical and mental wellbeing. The threats against