tick off the judge(s), and eventually they will throw the entire judgement out. ttp://twitter.com/MangoHeid Isolavalentine Or find them in contempt. ieterv Shaming a company for good responsive design, this is ridiculous. ttp://www.tumblr.com/blog/his-divine-sh\\... His Shadow Apple is unhappy with the verdict because its out of step with verdicts elsewhere, and the apology requirement is juvenile. That said, the best thing for them to do is run the ridiculous thing and be done with it. ttp://profiles.google.com/neotechni Techni Myoko Apple were forced to "apologize" because the judges were annoyed that following the initial ruling apple went to a neighboring court and re-filed the same case there. The UK ruling was EU wide, Apple knew this but still tried to present the case in Germany as a new case. That in and of itself is contempt of court. It smacks of running to daddy after mummy has said no. ttp://twitter.com/EvolvingViews EvolvingViews I was using on a full desktop screen 24 inch LCD in portrait mode, and I can see the full page of the UK site with footer no problem. So the assumption you made in your article that the code "essentially ensures that the iPad mini advertisement takes up the whole page" and push the footer out of sight was incorrect. Redgrave Anthony These 'jokes' Apple is pulling makes them either idiots, dumb, or childish pricks. This is how Apple shows respect to their customers, first mocking Samsung in the original excuses, now hiding it by default in the second time "let's apology"