in the category of: Rape apologist, rapist (love being called that because I dared to talk about male victims), bigot, racist, homophobe, loser who can't get laid & is angry at women etc... Should also bear in mind that rapes of women are woefully underreported, which is part of why you're full of shit. Treat men in monstrous fashion and you will create monsters. I just can't believe the blind rage and hate that some on this board reserve for white men. And it truly is hate, not revenge or justice. If you think simply observing "there is no way for women to know ahead of time which men are rapists and which aren't is "treating men in mounstrous fashion" then you are in cloud cuckoo land. If you think that "blind rage and hate" is being directed at white men then similarly you're simply not living in the real world. White men get treated fine here when they don't engage in apologetics for rape and racism. Again you mischaracterize Schroedinger's Rapist. It's not a stereotype, regardless of how much you refuse to acknowledge that. It is a colloquial explanation of how women are unable to know if a man is or isn't a rapist in the absence of context. Nor have you "kept your comments on point," you've introduced irrelevant facts like crime statistics and you've insulted feminists and many specific individuals on this thread. You've given as good as you got, and you've stuck around even when the