the first things that would be approachable for you and something that the Congress would potentially get behind. A: Yes, but I want to talk about the relationship. Just talking about the relationship is only allowing us an opportunity. Whether the mandate is on there or not they have a mandate but they didn't do a very good job. You take away the mandate, I don't know how it would change policy. But it's important to use that as an opportunity to talk about it. So this to me is a good opportunity to get this subject out on the table. Politically, it's an opportunity for us too. And like I said in the committee yesterday we had some former members of the Federal Reserve board there. And I don't know of anybody in the Congress that isn't against these high unemployment problems that we have. The problem is nobody asks the question of how it came about, where the bubbles come from, and why the corrections are necessary, and how it's related to monetary policy. So, politically it's very important for us to talk about jobs and everybody is talking about . Some talk about increasing spending and printing more money, my effort is to try to show how unemployment comes about and how it's related to the bad policies of the Federal Reserve. Q: And considering that jobs is topic number one in Washington right now, do you think that bringing this issue of the Fed's mandate on