At this point, it's almost a sure thing all 4 will be gone...on the other hand Vick/Reid have had success, what if the OLine was better? Why can't I shake the feeling that KC's FO doesn't know what it takes to win and will keep one or two of these jokers for another year (Pioli included). On a side note, how do people think KC would do with Reid/Vick in place of Cassel and Romeo. Does KC have anything that Philly is missing to be a winning team such as an adequate O Line? Someone started an Andy Reid thread in the KC forum, which is why i'm asking. I don't think we get Vick, but someone without a QB will give him a shot....and KC may be to close too Leavenworth for Vick. Well Vick did something right in '10 and it wasn't fluky stats like Cassel's TD/INT ratio...he's never gonna be above average at reading defenses, but that OLine in Philly is so bad, what if it was just adequate? Reid may use the run game less, but that's not all bad. Most KC fans like the idea of using Charles around 15-18 carries a game and extending his career...but still would like to see him get it 25-30 in a big time close game. I also drool over how good Charles would be with a respected passing game. _________________ terbo559 wrote: Kansas City play calling is predictable. I know when they are passing or running. Well Vick