scientist. I'm a biochemist. Do you seriously think I'm going to fly to New York and conduct my own meterlugrical tests on the ruins? THAT is what 'investigating properly' is. Not reading alt news sites. #76 is spot on. Thermite does not cut in the split second way that explosive charges do. There would be a better than 50:50 chance of toppling the tower across manhattan. Thats why no controlled dem EVER uses thermite. Comment number 79. "However, remote controlled aircraft and explosives are not exotic technology" AHHH! Remote controlled aircraft. Controlled from where exactly? Presumably another plane as the radio signal would be line of sight and the aircraft would have to be steered visually into the towers. Perhaps you can show me some video or radar footage of the 'chase' plane or some eyewitness accounts from ground crew at JFK who towed pilotless planes to the runway. Its precisely for these reasons people like you get branded a loony. There are more holes in the theory than theory itself. If you wanted to bring down the WTC wouldn't a huge truck bomb (coupled with thermite or whatever if you thought it was needed) just be SO much simpler to pull off? Comment number 80. While conspiracy theories are fun, in the case of WTC-7 they are pure fiction. Not only was the timing absurd on the face of it, (WTC-7 would have been destroyed much earlier in the day had it been the result of a conspiracy because