include the Seydels as defendants. In her suit, Dobner alleges the iAroma product was "intentionally mislabeled" as a potpourri product. Her lawyers assert that the store owners and distributors knew that the product was "routinely, if not exclusively, ingested by people" by smoking. Dobner also asserts that Mohsin was warned personally by someone that iAroma was dangerous and could "cause psychotic problems." And, Dobner alleges that Mohsin did not seek the identities of those making the product, or any lab certifications of the product's safety. In their responses, the defendants said the product was not sold to be smoked. Instead, they said, it was labeled "Not for Human Consumption" and was intended to serve as "an ionizer or deodorizer," similar to incense. They said anyone smoking the product, as Max Dobner did, would "misuse" the product. In the court filings, Mohsin's lawyer argued that Max Dobner "smoked iAroma in conscious disregard of the knowledge that doing so would cause him to become intoxicated" and, by doing so, "freely and voluntarily assumed the risk of consuming iAroma by smoking it." In a response filed by his lawyer, Kevin Seydel argues that, as a result, Max Dobner bears "50 percent of more of the total fault" in the incident. Mohsin also denied outright selling the product to Max Dobner on June 14, 2011, or ever being informed of the dangers of the product. Karen Dobner's lawyers, in response, have denied that Max Dobner's death was the fault of his own negligence and