sense of deigning inferior to a white person. Are you unable to understand other analogies and imperfect references as well or just the Schrdinger's Rapist one? Did this xkcd enrage you? Are you under the impression that celebrity roasts are cannibalistic gatherings and, if you're not, do you vehemently correct every person who uses the phrase? Well, it's not my ability to understand that's being questioned here. Unlike you, I get what Schrdinger meant with his concept of the cat in the box, while "Schrdinger's Rapist" is being trotted out as a valid concept, while the author of the concept it's based on designed his own experiment to be nonsense deliberately to ridicule the Copenhagen interpretation. You also appear to have trouble analysing mild annoyance to anger, as you seem to think that comic would send me into a frothing rage. It does not. In fact, it's funny, because it has the concept of Schrdinger's Cat (in this case Schrdinger's Comic) right in that says the last panel is both funny and not funny at the same time while Phaedra Starling has misinterpreted it to mean a rapist or not a rapist. -- julian PG, if you suddenly lost the ability to type, the world would be slightly better off. Then who would keep you in check? Meaning "Schrdinger's Rapist" makes the claim that a man is both a rapist and not a rapist at the same time until he's observed. No. No it doesn't. It doesn't make any claim