those things, since I believe he thinks the judge will go through a list with thousands of entries and make sure that everyone of them is in fact illegal without having to do so by the law. I hold Mr. Abrams in high regard. The same can be said of Mr. Tribe. If Mr. Tribe presented an opinion along the lines of Mr. Abrams I would certainly take note and give it serious consideration. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the submission by the "100 Law Professors", many of whose work I have studied over the years, and none of whom I generally associate with significant expertise in constitutional law. Had they taken the time to engage and traverse Mr. Abrams legal opinion, I would have given their work product fair consideration. Unfortunately, and for reasons unknown, they chose a different path, and it is this failing that leaves those of us who study the law to lend it little credence. Perhaps some time in the future they will cure this glaring defect, but until such time their argument in my opinion carries very little, if any, persuasive force. Re: First, don't use Microsoft Windows. The problem starts and ends with one factor... When the government decides to slander you, articles come out that issue bad PR. Sadly, after they are finished, there is no announcement that the investigation is over or you were cleared of charges. Thus the bad PR remains. Companies like YouTube and MegaVideo will be