Carrick : What happened was, was that there was an injunction preventing the publication of details about Ryan Giggs' extramarital affair, but then there were 75,000 tweets across the blogosphere or the twittersphere, and then it became so ridiculous that a member of one of the houses of parliament in the UK named Giggs in parliament. Peter Bartlett : If the mainstream media had breached that injunction, the court could've taken contempt proceedings, but the court cannot take contempt proceedings against 75,000 tweeters, especially where a lot of those people could not be identified and were probably out of the jurisdiction. Damien Carrick : It goes to the reality of the exchange of information in the 21st century. Peter Bartlett : It's very true, very true, and it does point out that there is a significant limit on the power of the courts to enforce their judgments with social media, and the same goes for any statutory privacy law. Damien Carrick : In more recent times there has been enormous concern about phone hacking and the scandal at the News of the World . We had of course the terrible case of Milly Dowler, a murdered teenager and her mobile telephone was hacked into by News of the World journalists. How does the terrible phone hacking scandal feed into this conversation? Peter Bartlett : I was in London the week that that broke -- the end of that week, when the last edition of News of the World out --