who want to change how the Labour Party selects its leader. The 40:40:20 remit looks likely to pass. But remember that's not the critical vote. The trigger within the caucus to start the leadership selection process is your most important vote today. The current remits are focused on 2/3rds, 55%, 51%. You need to understand 51% is the status quo, the current caucus trigger. The trigger needs to be lower if members are going to have real involvement in selecting their leader. In the UK it's 20%. If, for example, you want to have the opportunity to choose between Shearer and alternatives such as Cunliffe, that can only happen with a 40% caucus trigger. Mallard and King have a lock on too many MP's and if the trigger remains at 51% (or is increased) only they will hold the power to begin a leadership selection process. They can stick with Shearer until they are ready to install Robertson (probably far too close to an election). And where's the membership involvement there! If you think Cunliffe should just suck it up and wait, think again. If 40% fails today, it's time for four years of white anting by Mallard and King to stop. Cunliffe's talents should be used more productively outside the Labour Party. That's what Mallard and King want. What do you members want today?! Sorry Ianmac, it was shorthand for Remit 297(d). This is the remit that could finally give members some say on who our leader is. Presently