them into the limelight" This is highlighting the fact that women Web designers should be given more time in the limelight because they are female. Not because they are good designers. There is no doubt that this is promoting segregation. You're picking out one gender over another regardless of skill. How could it not be segregation? Why should gender determine how much "limelight" you receive? This is just the first two paragraphs. Let's not get into the wording of the questions themselves! I don't know when this issue started to show itself in our industry, but it needs to stop before people start getting fed up with all these women-only posts. I think we need to take on the article in a lighter note. Obviously, no one would want to promote sexism or anything negative around. Whereas the choice of words may sound a bit harsh, it's good for others to share the thoughts from female designers around the world. If we choose to ignore things like this and only look at the positive aspects then we'd never learn from our mistakes and things will continue to happen. Over, and over again. Anyway. I've made my point perfectly clear, and I'm yet to hear one argument for this kind of behaviour that actually makes sense. Women have fought long and hard to be treated equal. Don't go and ruin it all by making unfounded claims of male-dominance and over-generalised statements saying that women don't get the exposure they deserve. You