there is a need for more and more analysis to come out with any change in the current model.  This is one broad agreement which most of the members in the community have agreed. Also, there is an agreement that there is a need for more ideas, because this may not be the only solution. There could be many more models which could be analyzed and the pros and cons of those models could be understood before finalizing a concrete model.  That's how members feel.  Members feel that there should be more and more debate on various options. Also, it has been recommended during the face-to-face meeting that not only the members who are in the Working Group but such proposals may be placed by members who are not part of the Working Group.  So it is recommended that such communications shall be sent to APNIC too. The final agreement we have is that more options should be delivered among members, so that a model can be built after understanding the merits and demerits of each model, so we choose the best out of the models we have. There is a submission placed to the EC by a few of the members.  The members have asked for data that provides a census report on any of the past elections that helps to gather the information regarding participating tiers, so obviously it has to be provided by the Secretariat, but the submission is to the EC.  A member has asked for