more readily. Of course this is also the brilliant thing about these skis, in the right places. I find a ski with a less aggressive sidecut/larger turn radius more willing to pivot very small turns without the sidecut wanting to engage you into a turn of it's prescribed size. Of course a good skier should easily be able to ski whatever size turns they want without trouble. Case in point, although the Dynastar Sultan 85s were much better than the old Legend 8000s everywhere else (including carving on piste, despite being wider), the L8ks were a lot better in the moguls - I put this down to their mellower sidecut. Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name: Otherwise you'll just go on seeing the one name: Piccadilly , I am not sure discussion here can be described as "gleeful" people sharing there experiences and correcting some misconceptions. It's an interesting topic and everyone is or has been in the same boat when it comes to equipment choice. Truth is that there is no ski that would do everything equally good, and when some ski characteristics can be helpful in one type of terrain/conditions, it can actually be an impediment in other terrain/conditions. It doesn't mean that you need to change skis as your day progresses or need to own ten pairs, but understanding ski limitations will help to overcome them by adapting technique. Point is that money spent on lessons/courses generally yields better returns than money spent on