a person, but unthinkable to deal with the outrage it fosters to do so? Hitler would agree. I'm sure that he would have loved to have had you publish his thoughts on the "personhood" of the Jews and then defend him against the outrage that followed. Patduffield I'm shocked and I feel physically sick at the 'ethics' promoted in this article. As the mother of a severely physically disabled adult the suggestion that she should have been murdered at birth is horrific.  I use the word murder because that is what it is. I can accurately state, and prove, that the 'suffering' in her life has not been so much due to her disability but to the attitudes of health care employees who deliberately neglect her needs because they see her as less worthy and believe that they are entitled to discriminate against her because of this.  There have been incidents where her life has been put at risk due to this neglect and discrimination -- but she, quite rightly, refused to lay down and die! There are no 'ethics' in the promotion of murder.  Indeed this promotion of murder constitutes a hate crime.  There is no defence of the writing and publication of this appalling propaganda. It can not be defended by saying 'Singer said it first' -- Singer is wrong too! It can not be defended by quoting 'selected' online comments that disagree vehemently with the promotion of murder. Such comments reflect the horror and anger that people