but it's a system that's, as sales have shown, fun. Medal of Honor's multiplayer did not start out with such a system -- and Warfighter is, as I said, a prettier but still just the "same old song and dance." If you enjoyed the game, then I'm more than happy for you. But as it stands, and as it's always stood, reviews are opinions, and I did not enjoy Medal of Honor: Warfighter enough to recommend it higher than the opinion attached to the score it's been given. I also recommend that you look beyond the score and into the text (which you partially did, to your credit), and not compare scores one-to-one and focus on that. It's essentially an easy-to-look-to scale for getting a round test of an opinion. Posted by TraumaHunter on 29 October 12 at 2:32pm Then comparing it to a game it IS similar to -- the 2010 reboot. The 2010 reboot got a 7.5 -- yet even in this review it is praised as much better than the 2010 reboot? Has anything drastically changed in the FPS genre since 2010 that would cause the scale to weigh differently? Because isn't that the problem? Nothing is changing about the formula? True, innovation is appreciated when done correctly and for the greater fun factor of the game (especially in a genre as, to me, tired as FPS), but no -- the fact of the FPS genre not altering much is not the problem here. I think you