are used it is unrealistic to expect people to be able to match the key to the graph. Speaking for myself (though I think others on this board will agree) I prefer much more sobre colours than those used. Slide 31. If my interpretation above of what the non-uniform colours mean is correct, are we to assume that the amount of international credits is almost unknown for 2012, but very precisely known for 2050? Slide 61. In a long a complicated table faint grey backgrounds can be useful for guiding the eye along a long line, but this table isn't complicated enough for that to be an issue, and the backgrounds are too dark. Slide 67. Although more or less the same brownish orange is used on both the left and right halves of the slide, it means "allocated allowances" on the left but "States" on the right. (The green is more logical, meaning "Auctioned allowances" on the left and "Auctions" on the right.) Slide 76. Did the people who prepared these slides not have outline maps of Alaska and Hawaii, or did they think those Sates have little importance? Although in this slide they mostly use nice sobre colours, the boundaries between the States would be better in white. Over 20 years in business and as a strategy consultant, I've seen lots of horrible powerpoint in Australia. And I freely confess lots of it was mine. While I understand the process of writing good business plans and information memorandums