great eating at that size. Ticks, mozzies and leeches on the other hand i terminate with extreme prejudice. But as you say on a taking of life arguement there no difference between one animals life to anothers regardless of what they are. So that would mean theres no difference between taking a shark lifes as a shark taking a humans life. sea-kem I think you've totally missed the point mate. I kill Dhuies wrasse etc to eat and I do it conservitely.The reason I'm against the cull is that it serves man's purpose not the ocean's simple as that. If there is a proven rogue then of course kill it like you would a violent dog, that's a dangerous animal acting out of it's normal natural instinct. Prove to me that there is an over population of sharks (whites) then I would probably change my mind. Buz No didnt miss the point just trying to put it in a differn perspective as Paul was basically saying Killing Dhuis is no differnet than Killing a GW as you are still taking an animals life. But i agree with your view, being against a 'cull', and that if one is proven to be a rogue and can be 100% identified as a man killer, then i dont have a problem with that one being killed. Same as you say as any other wild animal that is 100% identified as a man killer. Just dont get the whole go out and kill X