top 3 mid feilders in the world, any team would have taken him at the time, the prem just wasnt for him. as a united fan we have heard about the veron transfer every single time a debate on transfers is on a blog, he also didnt cost 30m. its the same with rooney and rio, both on the other side of 25m. without starting any nonsense, usually when united spend we win the title. Comment number 50. I don't think there is any reason why Rodgers couldn't accommodate Carroll if he wanted to. The problem is if it's a compromise that doesn't play to either Rodgers' or Carroll's strengths. It makes sense to me that sending Carroll out on loan to a team like West Ham with a manager who will play to his strengths might be preferable to him warming the bench at Anfield where his value will only depreciate further. Comment number 51. Its cheaper to keep Carroll and buy left and right footed wingers such as Jarvis and Kightly from Wolves, and sell some of the other questionable purchases. This would fit in with Rodgers passing game and probably give them a shot at a European place. Making no changes would see them slide further down the table; the current sides form rate was relegation stuff, so something must change and couching isn't the answer. Comment number 52. Rodgers wasn't helping matters in the interview but he is a fair man and will give Andy a