time, place, and manner of an attack become clear." That authority is "not limited to the battlefields in Afghanistan," Holder continues, adding that, "We are at war with a stateless enemy, prone to shifting operations from country to country." Well, Mr. Holder, what if the neer-do-well Anwar al-Awlaki was hiding out in Canada? Would we send a fully armed drone up there to take him out? How about in Russia? Switzerland? OK, if a missile is too much, how about Seal Team 6? If not, then are we to further apply your "judicial process" only to selected countries? Moreover, General Holder's position lets us conveniently bypass our extradition treaties with other countries. The problem is that most of them, like the more civilized Canada and virtually all of Europe, deny extradition back to the U.S. if the accused may be subject to the death penalty. But, hey, who needs extradition when you've got a guided missile? Most of the civilized world respects the rule of law. Consider Israel for example. The Massad, their equivalent of our CIA, has hunted down, captured and then returned many suspected Nazi war criminals back to Israel for a trial; thus giving them their day in court and honoring due process. Even Iraq, after its "liberation" by the U.S. military, er, Coalition Forces, gave the evil Saddam Hussein a proper trail. And these guys were not "planners." They were, as G. W. Bush would say, really bad evil-doers. Of course, the U.S. mostly spins international