have one. Scholes is but he is almost 38! *shakes head in dismay* It wasn't good? We beat Fulham 3v2 and dominated all but the last 20mins, really we should have been 5v0 up by the end of the first half, and we also had the majority of the possession against Newcastle, where we won 2v1. I fail to see how that isn't good. They haven't had much of a chance, but they have made the most of the chances they have been given, it is unfair to judge them against midfielders who are playing constantly every week. I say they deserve a chance to properly prove themselves, and this is the right time to do it, when Cleverley and Anderson are playing well, whilst our first team midfield aren't. Re: What do Cleverley and Anderson have to do? everyone goes on about the cleverley anderson combo since last years start to the season. I personally think they are not world beaters in any way shape or form. For me scholes is still better than both of them. They were effective together last season for a very short period of time but it wasnt just them, everyone was on their game. They have both started games this season and it wasnt good. I look at both of them individually and I can easily name 10 centre mids in the premiership that are better than them. I look at man city, bayern munich, real madrid barca, we are falling behind. All