legal profession, and the classic example was Lara Bingle. Reporter : The picture snapped on a mobile phone while Bingle showered has reportedly done the rounds of AFL players. It's now featured in a Woman's Day article, but publishers insist they've done nothing wrong and no money was paid for it. Michael Rivette : The photograph of Lara Bingle that was taken by a footballer was taken as she came out of the shower, there was clearly horror on her face, it was in a private setting that was in...in the context of a sexual relationship that she was having. Sexual relationship is a clearly defined head of confidential information, and to my mind is clearly something that should remain private between the individuals; it's a fundamental human right. I was astounded that people hit the airwaves and said, 'No right of privacy, therefore, she's got no cause of action', and it was wrong, because she did have a clear cause of action; Giller and Procopets had been decided, she could've brought an action under breach of confidence to actually seek damages and to stop the further dissemination of that, those photographs. What she then subsequently did, or was alleged to have done, or I read that she did, was trade off the story. Now then, once she did that, she probably lost the rights to seek damages, because that would've been factored into the mix, but there's great ignorance out there as to what the rights that currently exist,