20mph now and have a huge queue behind them. Do you really think they will still drive everywhere at 20mph after this? I think it is far more likely they will drive everywhere at 10mph after a 20mph limit is introduced, given how slow this will feel i wager ill thought out overtaking maneuvers will become more common and you will see a static set of accident statistics on the back of this. I'd be quite happy to take you out on a bike ride to show you what the Cycling City money was spent on -- then you can judge whether it was a waste of money or not. What isn't necessarily understood is that to implement segregated cycling infrastructure requires space to be taken away from cars whether by removing parking or taking out lanes. I hope you continue to support that notion when the Council actually gets the political will to install some. I'm afraid that this scheme is utter folly and reeks of chasing funding for funding's sake. I wholeheartedly support 20mph outside schools, old people's homes and in narrow residential roads. However, extending the scheme to include main roads such as Whiteladies, Gloucester, Muller, Coronation etc. etc Roads is just wrong. During rush hour, the city's chronic congestion, aided and abetted by our appalling public transport, traffic speeds are self-regulating. Outside of the rush hours i.e. the majority of the time, driving at 20mph will cause completely unnecessary delays to people going about their lawful