continuing to promote doping at Katusha and Astana? JV has his faults, but I admire the business plan. You can say that none of them came forward before to admit doping, but if these guys didn't now (see Livingstone), then we'd still be in the dark ages. Plus he basically resurrected Wiggins career. You must be happy about that? Plus you have to respect JV for stepping away from a big contract at CA. He's not Bassons, but he's not victimless either. Sanctimony? Sanctimony? You mean the kind that a bunch of website commentors provide from their office desks about how everyone who ever doped should be piled into a railroad car and sent to a work camp? At least the Garmin guys are attempting to build a new reality with the current dearth of clean riders. Can't but commend them for that, can we? I agree the whole piece except for publishing biopassport data. It's not as easy to interpret data as that pirate speak guy makes it out to be. Sure, it may flag that the UCI is protecting a few riders. But it will also make everyone into faux experts on blood values. Instead, maybe they can open the data to recognized experts and researchers. Transparency through peer review (of a sort) Yes, it can be made available to curious experts. Ivan Basso asked people to register to review his data. And if published anonymously this could help protect riders. But with more frequent tests there would