these debates over exercise will end because they have zero relevance to how a body via intention engages with it's environment as it moves through space. You have to work on humans like humans, not furniture. Ciao. Most of the evidence comes from over sixty years of practitioners using this method of systemic neuro organization to obtain out comes as well as many books and studies on the method. My observations are from my own clinical experience. Beyond that does the explanation of a dynamic systems theory not resonate in your world? Is all PT education based on isolation intervention? I am thinking this is the case because nobody has been curious about a dialogue around the approach other than where is the empirical evidence. You cant compare a dynamic systems approach with a myopic leaning approach because the they are two systems that are looking for completely different indicators that point to injury resolution. The two approaches also have totally different indicators that would be considered moving towards resolution. The interesting conversation would be a around those indicators and how an entire system organizes to produce a chronic condition or how it organizes around an injury from an out side source. This was a similarly interesting conversation a few years ago when physical therapists realized "Tummy Time" was a bad idea to apply on infants and turned towards working with enhancing developmental movement to resolve slow movement towards rolling, crawling and weight bearing and developmental goals. Good recommended reading