were never meant to be released to the public. Which goes along quite well with my idea that the free-market is just justification for capitalism rather than a viable economic theory. Were they fully representative of the Labour leadership, or just a section?\ What did the "business representatives" want? And who were they? Where they fully representative of the business community, or just a section? What assurances, if any, were they given? Why was the meeting held behind closed doors? Why have all the identities of those involved not been revealed? Was monetary donations from business for Labour's election campaign one of the things discussed? What else was discussed? Will any of the subjects discussed behind closed doors between anonymous Labour Party leaders and anonymous business leaders be revealed to the membership? Secret discussions being held prior to conference between unnamed senior Labour Party and Business leaders behind "closed doors" surely is not a good look, does this sort of behaviour by the Labour leadership risk undermining the public's confidence that the Labour Party conference is the supreme democratic policy making body of the party? PS. Interesting how Rogue Trooper tried to divert the thread. Someone feeling a little bit sensitive about this issue being raised? If this is what we can expect from Labour in opposition, what can we expect from them in government? More secret "closed door" meetings with business interests, while social activists are locked out and ignored? Today is the day for all members and delegates