slippery slope that these two people should think very, very carefully about, as it may come back to hurt them -- if and when they are no longer deemed to be 'productive'. Isn't this the same kind of rationalization/thinking that gave us Hitler in the 1930s? Isn't this the same kind of thinking that would have killed Beethoven or Helen Keller? And isn't this the same kind of thinking that would have deprived the world of Albert Einstein (deemed by one teacher as being unable to learn)? Very, very misguided and dangerous assumptions to make as to the 'value' of one live by mere in fallible humans. Harry_piper So essentially you published an article that encourages infanticide. Your response (more of a pathetic whine)? "Stop ganging up on me! Be rational, would you?" and, hilariously, "Yeah, well, we wouldn't mind killing babies, but some of our detractors are racist!" I would just like to make this clear- you encouraged infanticide as a live option. I don't have to come up with a good argument against that. Stalin, Hitler or Pol Pot do not strike me as presenting ethical conundrums. I can only hope that some sort of legal action will be taken against the authors of this piece, and against the magazine that published it. Unfortunately, that's probably not going to happen. But at least we can help show this moral squalor to people everywhere, and in doing so destroy your moral credibility so that your damnable magazine can be