Yes yes, landlords will take a loss in your world. Every month. MAGIC. You insist that people who don't believe in your magic and don't watch trash youtube propaganda are "foolish". Newsbot9 Guessing? I'm reading the study. You're pushing MAGIC losses as good for landlords. Newsbot9 2. The Landlord passes the LVT onto the tenant. 3. Under the proposal which doesn't exist. And the Landlord can't afford to take the loss you're telling him he is. You are saying he MUST take a loss under a LVT. "Market Forces"? Ah yes, you can be homeless. Great alternative! There won't BE cheaper places to live, especially as land passes into the hands of a few under your proposal, as you raise tax on the poor dramatically. Newsbot9 No, energy efficiency isn't the concern of the landlord, he's not the one who pays it. Your LVT WILL throw millions out of their homes, and Harrisburg's social cleansing is a great example of it. LVT is a revolution, right, and like all such it will kill a noticeable part of the population and eat it's children. The bodies get stacked up, every time. You are saying that there will be enough casualties to mean there's a house for everyone, I see. That's a lot of dead bodies. I don't see mass murder as easy. "Planning laws will also protect green gardens, etc." So property will have even larger mandatory tax bills, ensuring that many of the lower middle class will have to die