of the workforce. In 2003. His comments weren't those of a southern state governor just after Ms. Magazine was launched and feminists burned their bras in the 1970s. His apparent feminist awakening didn't happen in the decade that the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade. This was 21st century Boston, home to a couple of pretty decent colleges with plenty of great women's minds, like Harvard, MIT, Boston College, and Boston University. But even in telling of this momentary awakening, Romney didn't quite get the facts straight. According to a news report, a women's PAC , seeking more gender equity in state leadership roles, put together said binder,  presenting it to their newly-elected governor. Romney was pushed to spend some time with those binders of women out of political necessity, not because he had become enlightened about affirmative action or had his eyes opened to the fact that women really can do the same jobs as men! Want a truer picture of how Romney views the role of working women? Take a look at how many were partners at Bain Capital when he was running it. Why does anyone care? The two candidates must care because women are the majority of voters in America, women vote in larger numbers than men, and women voters have determined the outcome of the last handful of presidential elections.  If you're a candidate who wants to be president, you have to woo and win women voters. And if you have a history of ignoring