before you ask, it is the very same E. Howard Hunt who was involved in Watergate. It doesnt prove that kennedy was assassinated by anyone other than LHO and it also doesn't prove that 9/11 was an inside job, but it does prove that you don't check out what you are saying before you say it. You 'Trumans' with your coincidence theories will have to do much better than this. Comment number 46. ChrisW78, it took nearly thirty years for the evidence that Martin Luther King was assassinated with cooperation of military sharpshooters, and the Memphis police. Those facts are no longer in any dispute. That a conspiracy involving murder is well covered, does not make it any less a crime. The 9/11 crime, in fact, is not particularly well covered. It simply is not palatable to a lot of people, especially in the midst of two wars (both of which resulted from the attacks), a highly polarized public in both the US and the UK, and the conservative drumbeat for Bush's war on terror. In Sept 2000, neo-conservatives at the American Enterprise Institute published a report for the Project for a New American Century called, Rebuilding America's Defenses. This neo-conservative think tank described in quite startling detail then the course the Bush admin has taken these past 8 yrs: greatly increased military spending, creation of long term lily pad bases in strategic locations for constabulary troops that would "keep the peace," changes in nuclear weapons policy, movements toward greater