the health groups pressure the government to free the funds on the reserve account to be used in a comprehensive tobacco control programme, the risk of losing the funds will persist. It is certain that the tobacco industry will continue its attack on the programme, continue to attempt to pass preemption bills, and suggest other ways in which the money could be spent. It is in the tobacco industry's best interests to keep the health education programme as limited as possible. While Arizona's tobacco control advocates have essentially fought the tobacco industry to a draw at the state level, they have scored several victories at the local level. Several cities have strong clean indoor air or youth access ordinances despite aggressive attack by the tobacco industry. 10 Arizona tobacco control advocates defeated a high profile attempt by the tobacco industry's National Smokers' Alliance to roll back a strong clean indoor air ordinance in Mesa. 20-22 105-110 With the AzTEPP local projects well under way, an increase in local level activity is expected. Arizona's tobacco control advocates appear well positioned and unified in their efforts to continue to press for local ordinances. The open question is whether they will build on this base and muster the resources necessary to realise fully the opportunities created by Proposition 200 at the state level. Conclusion Arizona's experience with Proposition 200, in addition to California's 2 6-8 and Massachusetts' experience, 3-5 9 provides public health advocates with further insight in their effort to control tobacco