in her report she said that should be prohibited steps order against me too because in her opinion I could feel so down and exhausted with court procedures that could wish to flee to my original country Ukraine which is not party to the Hague Convention. Its left me extremely devastated as I have son from first marriage in Ukraine and my old grandmother - and last two years have to visit them only for four - five days in a year by leaving behind the child with friends and my older son who live with me here in UK. Child every time feels in stress being left without mother for those few days, me too. And thought I have never give any reasonable grounds to believe that likely child to be taken to my original country to live permanently, as find myself much more secure here but judge firstly said that prohibited steps order going to be interim for me, but not for the ex but on the final hearing left Prohibited steps order for both of us. So I cannot exercise the Residence order fully for taking child without consent of the father for up to one month. If it would be more reasonable to appeal final hearing decision or better to fight later on - year or two, say with records returning the child after short holidays if I hopefully will be granted with time. Thank you for taking time to read and will appreciate any suggestions.