the games on consoles (never played a PC Bond, and I don't know that I'd like to), and I still think Activision is doing a better job than EA did. AUF was good, NightFire was okay (good levels, but the story was crap), EoN was actually great, Rogue Agent sucked ass, FRWL was generic, TND was crap, TWINE N64 was good but the PS1 version sucked and 007 Racing was a piss poor excuse for both a driving game and a Bond game. Sure, Activision may be making COD clones, but at least the COD gameplay is successful, if repetitive. If you played on consoles @DarthDimi , you'd think differently ;) You missed out on Everything or Nothing and the good version of Nightfire. For me, it's EA&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Activision by a mile. I did play the games on consoles (never played a PC Bond, and I don't know that I'd like to), and I still think Activision is doing a better job than EA did. AUF was good, NightFire was okay (good levels, but the story was crap), EoN was actually great, Rogue Agent sucked ass, FRWL was generic, TND was crap, TWINE N64 was good but the PS1 version sucked and 007 Racing was a piss poor excuse for both a driving game and a Bond game. Sure, Activision may be making COD clones, but at least the COD gameplay is successful, if repetitive. The Nightfire, Everything Or Nothing and Agent Underfire gameplay was more successful because they actually felt