actions. If someone just came out and said "we got it wrong in all the confusion" then half the conspiracy theories would never have started. It also doesn't help that the official story is itself a conspiracy theory. Of the 19 people that the FBI claim were the hijackers, half a dozen have come forward protesting their innocence. The fact that they are still alive to do so lends their story a certain credence. Comment number 10. Since Chief Daniel Nigro didn't tell you he was in communication with Larry Silverstein on 9-11 (or I assume you'd have highlighted that by now?), and as the Chief says, he doesn't need anyone's permission to direct his team, isn't it unlikely Silverstein was referring to the fire crew? If Silverstein was referring to the fire crew, then why hasn't Chief Nigro confirmed that they spoke together about this? And according to Rudy's lawyer, on the day, when it was still fresh in his mind, he recalls explosions. Now, 7 years later, he's sure it wasn't explosions...maybe his statements have changed because the other guy who was with him, who says he heard explosions has recently turned up dead? Anyway, I'm pretty sure that witness testimony on the day of the event, is more generally more credible than recollections 7 years later. You claim you are not part of the coverup...so why did the BBC refuse to air video footage of the collapse of WTC7 for over 5 years? Why did your organisation,