is 25. Another colleague (B) can't afford to come, but would drive us for free if we paid for his ticket. He also lives close by, so could pick us up and drop us from our doors. I proposed this to work colleague A, who refused to split it on the grounds that he's already paying for another person. He proposed that I pay the whole cost of the ticket, because he's already paying for somebody else and it wouldn't be 'fair'. If I pay the whole 25 cost of the ticket, I'm then subsidising work colleage A + his squeeze's entire transport cost. And paying 10 more than I would using public. If we split the ticket, I save 2.50- not really enough to be massively bothered with. However, he saves 17.50. I've pointed this out to him, but he still insists that it wouldn't be 'fair' to split the ticket and that I should pay. AIBU to think: 1. That my new colleague is unable to do simple mathematics 2. That I am not paying the full cost of colleague B's ticket 3. That it is perfectly fair to split the ticket cost 4. That I am never inviting anyone along to anything out of pity ever again I'm not being stingy, am I? Being made to feel like I am at the moment. So work colleague A can't use public transport alone/with girlfriend without you to hold his hand and Work colleague B doesn't want to be