world, there is no need to wait until you are back to a WiFi or cable internet connection and a computer. But of course to do this you need a 3G enabled data SIM in the camera and this brings additional costs. In a commercial situation say a surveyor or a mobile worker, there is a strong argument for business where paying for the monthly cost of a SIM in a camera will pay for itself.  It will make the sharing of images easier and simpler and the business can normally afford the associated costs. There will to be a similar argument for professional photographers and avid enthusiasts. However, the average person who walks the street and takes pictures of their friends, families and events, would they use the 3G, I believe all would like to but I am inclined to think many won't and here is why. The confusion between camera and smartphone.  We all carry a phone and many now use the phone camera instead of a compact camera.  The compact camera or SLR comes out only at special events in many family scenarios. The Galaxy camera is a smartphone without the phone function thus does someone now carry a smartphone and the Galaxy camera or do they carry the smartphone and the Galaxy camera only to the events they would normally have taken their compact camera too? The Galaxy camera will take a better picture than a conventional smartphone, but isn't likely to come up to par