even the Obama administration, which is pledging a much stronger policy of engagement with the U.N. Security Council is going to find that there are certain international crises, security crises or humanitarian crises, that are not workable or are not being adequately addressed through the U.N. system. And I think the Obama administration is going to reserve for itself the possibility of operating outside that system. I think it -- On security issues like weapons of mass destruction proliferation, I think the Obama administration internally is going to reserve for itself options that look a lot like the preemption doctrine that the Bush administration articulated. They're not going to go out and pound their chests and explain it the way that the Bush administration did, and this gets at the important point about tone that John raised before. And on the issue of preventing genocide, the current U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice, made very clear, she was very explicit in her 2007 testimony on the Hill, that if the U.N. doesn't adequately act to stop ongoing genocide in Darfur, the United States should take unilateral military action. This is our U.S. ambassador to the U.N. arguing in favor of unilateral military action, if necessary. TOOBIN: Before we go to questions from the audience, I just want to raise one more topic for everybody to weigh in on, which is the International Criminal Court. We are not part of it. It's coming up on its 10th anniversary now. Is