because all tagged sharks were potentially dangerous. "It would be risky for people to make value judgments about the level of risk based on the size or species of sharks or their behaviour," he said. chris raff to individual sharks ...didn't realise that before , therefore it is possible to isolate a problematic shark...ohhh what's that , fisheries won't disclose information regarding whether it's 1 shark or many sharks setting off receivers what sort of bulltish is that Oracle From one side, I see the "let them be", but from the other side, "screw diving this year" is ringing in my ears. Why can't the goverment issue licences. Say it costs a boat or individual $2000 to catch and KEEP a GW. Then we can control the "cull" of sharks and also put this money towards research and tagging to sharks. If you have a licence, then you do what you wish. Catch and release, catch and waste, catch and eat/teeth/photo opportunity. Who cares!If you have no licence, then deal with the laws as they stand right now. If you let it go, you need to tag and record it as fisheries does until you get what you are looking for (for me, that big boy!) More money to fisheries to research, few more tags running around and a few less sharks in the metor area, win, win, win. squidder I really think a lot of the posters are very selfish in wanting a Cull. Take a step backwards, say