said he did "(naturally no personal details were passed on). Michael did not want to know, he did not need to know that personal info." Just because he shared some bitchy comments made behind a guy's back with the subject of the bitchfest, does not mean he would spread information that would put someone at risk. "all you have is his word" yes, and the same goes for every single other person on that mailing list. All you have is their word, and some of them have posted made private emails public without consent before. Yeah so try empathising with Natalie Reeds position where she is at the mercy of TF's honesty and integrity in not releasing personal information. Given he dishonestly accessed emails would you trust him with information that important? Especially when he had some spat on Twitter calling Natalie a liar? Do you ever read stuff before replying? This is becoming a pattern. "Just because he shared some bitchy comments made behind a guy's back with the subject of the bitchfest, does not mean he would spread information that would put someone at risk. "all you have is his word" yes, and the same goes for every single other person on that mailing list. All you have is their word, and some of them have posted made private emails public without consent before." I trust all my closest friends with my life, but I wouldn't trust any of them alone with my pint. These are on very