already know is right anyways. What does her saying "we should impeach" achieve at the moment? Can anyone answer that? " Pelosi did the right thing by saying it was "off the table." Meanwhile, even though she's said this, Kucinich somehow got a bill in there on the impeachment of Cheney. If it was off the table, how did this happen?" This is what the public doesn't understand. If Kucinich understood the process as he should, then why tease with such an empty gesture to a desperate public? Does he lack maturity? Did he wish to appear heroic at the expense of his party? The messages coming out DO NOT CLARIFY and further confuse those who wish to understand. They are making people crazy. I have no argument with any of your statements as to "why" of Pelosi's strategies. I don't think what Kucinich did was a tease to the public at all. Examine the timing of it and what has happened since along with other factors. 1.) Kucinich is looked at as a Dark Horse Presidential candidate. He's one of the few people that can absolutely get away with introducing such a bill with out facing scrutiny that would hold back other issues. 2.) The bill was in regards to the Vice President, not the President. 3.) The VP had been accused, and discovered, of having his nasty hands involved in multiple scandals and possible crimes. In a sense, while I could be wrong, it is my firm belief