experiences of God I don't that's correct, since if we could, we already would have. Plus, I don't think a God consistent with truth would tend to allow such unity. Humans are lazy. Putting aside religion, as it relates to this forum, in my view, if you have logical reasons to believe the Singularity will happen, by definition you have a logical reason to believe in God - regardless of It's nature. If God is truth, whatever you discover as truth would have to be God. That is a simplified form of the qal va-homer argument, but whatever you argue about God by analogy, you would have to assume it to be exactly consistent with truth as you discover it. This is most interesting, because your discovery of truth would always be your discovery, and proof would still not be forthcoming in regard to God. From our point of view there is no discernable difference between the entity that will exist at the other end of the Singularity and God. Again, the problem: if we can discover it, we don't need it in the first place. Whatever we can know can be programmed, so "God by analogy" could never be found. Therefore, if you can believe in the possible existence of a God entity in the future, then you can't really say that It can't exist now. As other threads discussed, time is not as straightforward a concept as we think it is anyway. If we conclude that "God" is