isn't that convenient that, that particular custodian gets appointed trustee, since that custodian got to oversee files that contain files with lost note affidavits. Weird huh. The other custodian handled the other 98...%. Now the prior Trustee just got sued. This is such a master plan at work. Is it a conflict of interest if the custodian of an alleged Securitized Trust is substituted in as the Trustee for the alleged Securitized Trust at summary judgment hearing, due to the resignation of the alleged Trustee??? The investors might state that -- -- the custodian is supposed to examine the loan files -- as an initial duty -- -a check on the originator later the custodian is supposed to check the payoffs on prepaid notes etc to make sure the SERVICER is not cheating the investors im having some difficulty seeing how as a contractual matter the custodian acquires a right to enforce however -- -unless the investors appointed it -- in which case the conflict of interest issue is gone This is a forum to exchange experiences, knowledge and thoughts. Could someone please answer this: Is it a conflict of interest if the custodian of an alleged Securitized Trust is substituted in as the Trustee for the alleged Securitized Trust at summary judgment hearing, due to the resignation of the alleged Trustee??? If there was really systematic fraud of the type described surely the volunteer bank attys at Department of justice would be coordinating with state, local investigators and the