by Mike A Males. Check it out. The problem with the libertarian argument here is that if an adult sent or received such photos of minors most of us would say 'yuch', and agree it's nasty child porn and should be prosecuted, just as adults having sex with minors. Logic then begs two questions a) 'why shouldn't it be criminal for teenagers to send/receive the same photos' and b) 'should teens be prosecuted for statutory rape, or only adults'? Seems like some double standards. These charges are nothing but stupidity on steroids and meth. I had commented on the overcharging of the 'sexters' on another site immediately after it happened. The only thing thats' changed is that kids are using cell phones rather than Polaroid cameras. While this trend is not exactly a real good idea,( due to the fact that 'net stuff has a rather long shelf life), it should be discouraged rather than have extreme penalties applied to it. Seems what we have here is a prude who is scandalized that teens are sending pictures of themselves in their 'birthday suit' to other teens. Won't even go near the other bit about kids in swimsuits, or any "provacative" pose. Who decides what is permissable, and what is not? Combating the taliban abroad and emulating them at home seems perverse. This website is named Reason; some of the comments on this article seem totally berift of reason and/or logic.. My only point is that if you take the Bible