I have been skipping a bit). AND worst of all, it is generally accepted that it is 'cohort' not 'cohorts' -- sorry! Exceptionally nice post Violet, as it happens I was interested in the religious post and it is part of what makes me like Paul's blog (go Paul! Even though it is a catholic, Rangers hating name, go Paul!) I too am interested in the whole EBT question, and while I am on landing on Celtic's side in defence of the cleared case against their's, I can see where AB is coming from -- even if it is done in a very irritating way and one eyed way, Finally, in defence of Paul, and shame on you for skipping some of the comments, but Paul was replying to AB's comment which including cohorts. Paul, I forgive you for not checking AB's comment better, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt in assuming AB is a literate, analytical poster. mikey re yrs of 15 sep 7.24 pm. glad you think AB may have a valid point. sorry but have to take issue with you and other like-minded souls over your interpretation of an ebt and how the celtic one was ok. no it wasn't. firstly it is no great surprise to me that spl deem it ok, AFTER celtic had put right, under duress from hmrc, what had, up to that point, been deemed illegal. the time for spl to come down hard on celtic would have been when