was that the moderator started asking asinine hypothetical questions about "what if Israel attacks Iran" before we got a single question about Mexico. I'm not a Romney fan but I thought he was 100% right to refuse to answer that one. It was dumb to the point of being insulting. You are right.... this was not much of a foreign policy debate. Not a lot of substance when you consider the number of problems that exist around the world.... Going into this debate, I think I was already pretty familiar with President Obama's foreign policy based on his actions the last four years. I am very comfortable with his world views, policies and temperament regarding foreign affairs. I did learn more about Romney. Not so much about his foreign policy, but that he once again flip flopped in this debate and went from hawk to dove. Honestly...this guy is willing to take any stance at any time...anywhere... to get elected......not to govern but to be president. This is not just rhetoric.... not just a talking point....this guy is a real chameleon and there are miles of videotape to prove it. Yes, I do realize this is politics, but Romney is seriously over the top. So I think I got what I needed from the debate....it was just an affirmation of what I already knew. I think it was quite clear that Romney could not actually debate foreign policy, but rather agreeing with Obama was his best strategy. I find it