like the (equally annoying) environmental/disposal surcharge added on at the end of an oil change. Both allow the business to quote a lower initial price. If I have to pay something, I want it included. I also agree that ipsedixit's example has the added political dig. The difference with used motor oil is that the owner of the vehicle typically has the option of taking the used motor oil home with her (thus avoiding the disposal charge). No such option with the surcharge for healthcare. I saw that on a menu last year in SF. It sparked an uncomfortable political discussion at a family dinner about the ordinance the minute we picked up the menus. Boo. Thanks a lot, restaurant. That really enhanced my dining experience. Everyone who lives in SF is aware of the new ordinance so it's not like they are providing anyone with info they didn't already know. I think it is tasteless. Are you saying that you do not tip on the healthcare surcharge, the wine cork disposal surcharge, the employee vacation surcharge, the fried food oil disposal, and then the non-renewable produce surcharge? Fee upon you!!!!! Have you not heard that all restaurant staff must be guaranteed six weeks, no expenses, at an approved Club Med? No, there WILL be more surcharges, than any of us can comprehend. Then, as mentioned up-thread, let's not overlook the VAT at ever level, from asparagus farmer, to the packaging company, to the shipper, to the chef (or distributor