no one wants their weight back they lost with weight watchers and running. ttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=5\\... Danny Klopovic I'd add the annoying atheist cliche that "absolute fundamentalism is the more logically consistent view" if only because it reveals on the part of the atheist making that claim their intellectual dishonesty. Chris B. We do commonly speaking of losing things that we do not want to get back in other contexts.  For example, we speaking of losing weight without implying that we want the weight back!  Nevertheless it is good to make people aware that we do not see being nonreligious as lacking something desirable. Jake Some annoying atheist cliches? How about "Critical Thinking"/"Reason"/"Evidence Based", basically all forms of these phrases. They have become so overused by the atheist movement that they are now nothing more than mere buzz words repeated endlessly with no real thought given to their meaning. ttp://www.facebook.com/darren.nolen Darren Nolen The use of "Belief" is problematic, and it should not be the case where religionists get to own a word that is so central and necessary for non-religious uses. One simple distinction that can be used is "Believe" versus "Believe In". I believe that Evolution through Natural Selection explains the existence, diversity, and distribution of life. This is a different statement than "I believe in Evolution." To a Christian, saying "I believe _in_ X" is a statement of dogma. I have attempted, in the past, to shift the religious connotation of Believe onto the word Faith (which is where I