We have detected that you are using an older version of Internet Explorer and to have access to all the features on this site, you will need to update your browser to Internet Explorer 8 . Alternatively, download Mozilla Firefox or Chrome . We have detected that you have javascript disabled in your browser; to have access to all the features on this site, we recommend you enable javascript. The Emperor LAURENCE REES : How should we characterise the role of the Emperor and this perennial question of the guilt of the Emperor? AKIRA IRIYE : I think there are two aspects of that. One is that war was fought and ended in the name of the Emperor, so that if there had been no Emperor or if the Emperor's role had been defined somewhat differently then the war might not have taken place and might have been fought in a different way. But the whole educational system, mentality and everything else had been so tied to the Emperor system that it would be very hard to say that the Emperor system as such, had nothing to do with war. It was fought in the name of the Emperor. And the second question is the Emperor himself, personally. I mean he's the one who determined and approved the mission to go to war. He's the one who signs the declaration of war, he's the one who admonishes the soldiers to fight and so on. And he's also the one who