Israeli attack on Iran and if one does occur, prefer it to happen with US approval or assistance" And what's new or surprising about that? Do you think Israelis like to go to war at the drop of a hat, out of sheer bloody mindedness? What an idiotic argument. 03/02/2012 - 10:47am EDT | wildboy "The debate about Iran's nukes has been going on for years." Isn't that the whole point about why Obama may be skeptical with all the "zone of immunity" talk these days? After all, Israelis were claiming five years ago and ten years ago that Iran was going nuclear, there was little time left to act, something had to be done. Nothing was "done" (at least not the kind of "something" the Israelis wanted), and here we are in 2012 with no Iranian bomb and no Iranian ability to quickly assemble one. Why should the Americans now take Israeli assessments at face value, when they didn't before? Oh, I forgot -- because George W. Bush was a True Friend of Israel and Obama is the kushi who learned ev ... view full comment "The debate about Iran's nukes has been going on for years." Isn't that the whole point about why Obama may be skeptical with all the "zone of immunity" talk these days? After all, Israelis were claiming five years ago and ten years ago that Iran was going nuclear, there was little time left to act, something had to be done. Nothing was "done"