trying to rabble rouse against the law ... surely SF is the wrong place for that. I recently encountered a recorded statement from an administrator of a government program--they were clearly peeved by a change in the law that meant they needed to change the way they were doing things. I was frankly amazed, since the overall law's existence is the only reason they have a business ... My point is that SF is well known as liberal ... there's a reason why this law exists in SF and not, for example, in the red state where I live. I would hope (as a native San Franciscan) that the majority want to do the right thing ... I feel that this is more info, than I want. What about the tip for the trashman, who allows two bins, rather than three? What about the bribe to the traffic cop, who lets patrons park in the empty church parking lot, after hours? Now, being in AZ, it is probably too easy to say, "hey, this sounds like a CA thing," but maybe not. When I dine out, I do not care to see a spreadsheet of the financial comings and goings of a restaurant. I am not an accountant, and do not care where their overhead is spread. Show me the charges (all inclusive), and do not grovel at my feet trying to tack on extra charges, in hopes that I will be pleased that we have saved some fish that