then, and are now, absolute masters at saying something that is either true, or impossible to prove false when dissected down. "Now there are 250,000 more people working in the auto industry than the day the companies were restructured. Governor Romney opposed the plan to save GM and Chrysler" Those two sentences are and the inferred contradictions with the facts are the basis for Mr. Gregory's article. And yet read them again. The first sentence has NOTHING to do with the second. The crowd goes wild as they draw the lines of conclusion their way, the author fumes going the other, but in fact, all the while Mr. Clinton can claim, and correctly so, to be factually correct. According to the very statistics Mr. Gregory posts, there *are* 236,600 more jobs in the auto industry in America. These are not necessarily jobs at American companies, and in fact Mr. Gregory makes a beautiful case for this, but Mr. Clinton never claimed they were. He simply said there were a quarter million more jobs in the "auto industry." Had he claimed there were a quarter million more jobs "at GM and Chrysler", or "at GM", he would be clearly wrong. But he didn't. It is Mr. Gregory that spent the rest of the article (which I enjoyed, btw) as if Mr. Clinton *did* say that. But he did not, and can claim, as he has in the past so brilliantly, "I didn't say that." The next sentence is a no-brainer. Did