I'm thinking that new moniker would better comport with the objective reality of Web's condition and issues. Hey Web! We're both ol' coots so I was pretty sure you'd enjoy a bit of good-natured ribbing. From your response, I can see I was right. And I can take it too, Web. No need to rush it, naturally. Just keep track, and when I lead with my chin at some moment, nail me. The cat-and-mouse gamesmanship of the deal is part of the fun -- the best part, I think. It is ironic to hear the word restraint form webhubcolonoscope. On the origins of AGW space cadets. 'The exact origins of a space cadet are unknown but rumor has it that their home planet was destroyed due to pollution caused by poor house keeping. Following this disaster they proceeded to disperse themselves throughout the universe and litter the gene pool. Space cadets are known for their poor skills in common sense areas such as coordination, food preparation, basic cleaning and processing simultaneous coherent thoughts.' You guys are birthers because you believe that climate change must come from "naturalized" processes. It can't be from any foreign sources such as man-made forcing functions, such as anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Much like the tea-party birthers, climate birthers won't listen to reason and are driven by an underlying agenda. Most rational skeptics of the CAGW premise are rationally skeptical of the "C" in "CAGW" (not the GH theory, the fact that CO2 is a GHG, that