effectiveness. In the regular season he's watched like a hawk. I love the "human torpedo" aspect to his game and would love to have a less risky version of it back again. Bleach Clean 01-03-2012, 11:10 AM Tanner Glass, on the other hand, is a guy I think we should have retained. It's true that he was weak in both of the last two post-seasons, but is Dale Weise any better as a player? At $750,000, Glass is having a very solid season in Winnipeg and his fighting ability far outstrips that of Weise. IMO, Glass was also a more consistent physical presence. It seems like Weise can go full games at a time without making a hit. Granted, Aaron Volpatti was supposed to help fill the role that Glass left vacant and he's injured, but that to me was a signing that got away from the team. I don't think so at all. He was a player MG had to let go IMO. First, he could not keep up in playoff hockey (as you stated). So you know his usefulness is limited to the regular season. Second, his primary contribution was not his hitting, but his fists. Yes, he was a consistent hitter, but there are a plethora of that type of player - what set him apart was that he hit _and_ fought. In essence, a middle-weight that could somewhat play. But here's the crux of it, if his primary function is to fight, then there are much