that in keeping with the way you have seen these kinds of cases handled? JANE HARMAN, former U.S. representative, D-Calif.: Well, I was the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee for four years. I served on the committee for eight years. And in my ranking member position, I and the chairman were briefed regularly by the FBI on pending high-level cases. But those cases involved counterintelligence or counterterrorism. I don't think that was this case. I do think there are bizarre issues here. It started out, so far as I can tell -- and I'm not sure I have got it all down here -- as an investigation into alleged cyber-stalking by Paula Broadwell. And that led to the rest of this material. As Matthew Miller just said, if a crime was being -- an alleged crime was being investigated, it would be improper to tell anybody about it. And that could blow the investigation. There also wasn't so far as anyone has said any counterterrorism or counterintelligence charge against David Petraeus. So, at that point, I see no reason why Congress should have been told about it. However, at some point, the FBI not only told a couple members of Congress, including Eric Cantor, but then told the director of national intelligence, Jim Clapper, about Petraeus' involvement. And I think Congress has every right to understand what this process was, who this perhaps rogue agent who -- and I just learned from your broadcast was friendly with the