everyone says that, it was a very common theme in the submissions to the Guide, it was a very common theme in the submissions to the Windsor Inquiry. Tony Windsor belled the cat and that's why I call it the Windsor Rules Review. I wish I had said it but he said it first -- and good on him -- but I think I have an obligation to incorporate it. So if that's Line A of work: Infrastructure; and that's Line B: Localism (opportunities to make 10 buckets... use more efficiently make it 6 buckets; and this [Line C] is an opportunity to save gigalitres of water by a proper rules review, then the 955GL in the second half gets reduced by whatever we get out of Line A, whatever we get out of Line B and whatever we get out of Line C. So we subtract from that the savings we make out of that work. Now that involves communities, it involves the states and it involves the use of infrastructure. So rather than just a big cut on one day -- a volume of water -- we're incorporating proper management, we're incorporating infrastructure and we're incorporating smarter ways of managing the river under the rules, recognising it's one system rather than a whole lot of state-based systems to give us a dividend at the back-end before we ever actually get to the SDL in 2019. I think that's a more complete story, a more sensible story, than just