711 and 734 patents failed. Conclusion After a skip and a jump over a contractual point regarding the meaning of an undertaking by Delta to Virgin, the Court ended on a 14-page meaty non-designation point - a point raised on appeal by Premium.  This discussion warrants a separate post by the AmeriKat, save to say that the point failed. So, for those keeping score the judge held that the 908 and 711 is not infringed by the Solar Eclipse seating system (in original and variant headrest form) 734 would be infringed by the Solar Eclipse seating system (in original and variant headrest form) The modified Solar Eclipse does not infringe any of the patents None of the patents are invalid for added subject matter or for obviousness So after 10 days in trial 5 QCs and 4 junior barristers (yes, count them, 9 barristers in total) we are only a step closer to seeing a finale of this ongoing dispute which has seen the parties before the High Court (three times), the Court of Appeal (twice?), the Supreme Court and the EPO (see previous Kat posts here ). Readers may recall that this dispute also has a damages element which is subject to an appeal to the Supreme Court on the Unilin Beheer v Berry Floor point.  That point questions whether there can be a recovery of damages at a time when validity is still in issue in opposition proceedings before the EPO.  Under the current law, even where the