Many "come-outers" bring an early anger against religion that generally, but not always matures to primarily dealing with how to live their lives as Humanists. Some of us were never religious. The way I see it we all exhibit all of the proclivities we see in the non-theistic movement at one time or another. We all have moments where we are more rational, and others where we are more emotional, moments where we are angry to religion and others where we are more tolerant, moments where we desire to be solitary and moments where want to be nurtured by our communities, moments where we like the ritual of celebrations, and moments were we are more skeptical. We are both/and creatures and while having certain proclivities, we are constantly changing which is why labels of any sort are inherently misleading. We are universes in ourselves. Regardless, our orientations do matter and people and our chapters tend to emphasize one aspect or another. Some of us concentrate on building intentional Humanist communities and others on stomping out religions intrusion into church and state. Some of us are drawn to creating a more rational society, while others on building a more caring society. I don't consider any of the tendencies we carry as ideologies, but more like styles. It's sort of like when we wake up in the morning and we decide if today we dress casually in jeans or we dress up or even change later in the day. In the end