Australian promising to dedicate its reporting about the Greens to telling them what they already -- because they believe what the Australian tells them about the Greens -- believe about the Greens. Perhaps if they gave less op-ed space to denialists in their paper, and more space to those who can answer this question, they wouldn't need to ask their readers, who are likely to be similarly clueless. I note too that Bob Brown has complained to the ABC about the lack of their focus on the Greens during the campaign, picking up on what I've noticed not just in the campaign, and commented on ages ago. Sky is really the only network that gives time to Greens MPs, and puts the public broadcaster to shame. There is something spectacularly hypocritical about the Greens being attacked for "not getting enough scrutiny" by media that refuse to give them a hearing. Or attacked for "not having costed policies" in the days when government refused to let anyone but them have access to treasury costings. Or attacked for being irresponsible spendthrifts seconds after attacking them for proposing certain taxes that would pay for those policies. I think AB might get his wish. The Australian just ran an experiment, and the lesson it will have undoubtedly learned is that telling a pack of divisive, inaccurate, calculated B.S. delivers outcomes. It's descending rapidly into Fox News territory. I wonder if the "leftist" Sky will follow ... I think it was a crikey article which