I invoke my own definitions that arrange a stable understanding in my mind ... fairly formed in my nurture ... to understand my nature. 'Religious' 'spirited' and 'moral' are the primary three words I conform for three different meanings. Comments in this thread so far present my ideas (and better-said) among the three words. But let's add just this: adopting a (an 'organized') religion does not make you moral, does not change your inborn morals or morality. And my reference is Pinker's "The Blank Slate" for 'inborn morality' (also intrinsic, innate, and yes genetic), found with my definition of 'moral(s)'. As a proactive plan To PRECLUDE some (plausible) worldwide 'religion' contest and then a winner that gets to dictate Earthlings' motto, whether: In God we trust In Allah we trust In Abraham we trust In Confuscious we trust In Dharma we trust, instead let's coin a new word, change the semantic, which designates the object of humankind trust. Let's say Luck -- branding (objectifying) the sense of superstition. In Luck we trust. Go with Luck. OML (Oh My Luck) Almight Luck. Praise be to Luck. Luck bless America. The expression makes plain that in each now, T(n), anticipation of a next moment in time, T(n+1), exists of our forming (anticipation) ... well, we are pressing our Luck. By translating the article's title into my language, I can answer its question: Yes, all are born Lucky ... and if it wasn't for bad Luck, some have no Luck at all. One