is the most populated city in Australia.) In the coherence theory, facts are arranged in a consistent and logical manner, using our reasoning. In the pragmatic theory, if something works, it is true. This is using deduction. Scientific thinking plays a big role in these three theories of truth. The origin of the human race is one which really supports scientific thinking. While it has all the traits of a scientific belief, the "missing link" has still not been found. And until this "missing link" is found, we cannot come to a conclusion. Therefore the theory is unproven and cannot be rendered true. However, the "creationist" theory is more convincing because there have been holy writings and scripts such as the Bible and the Qur'an for example. "Scientific foreknowledge in sacred texts" is the belief that certain sacred or holy scripts contain scientific knowledge that was later discovered by technology and science. The circulatory system was mentioned in the Bible. Embryology was explained in the Qur'an. These scripts were sent down long before the evolution and advancement of science and technology. This supports the "creationist" theory adopted by many religions. My point here is that although the "creationist" theory opposes that of Darwin, scientific proof really helps it's feasibility. If we are going to think scientifically, Darwin's theory of evolution is going to win us over very easily. This is because we can't see the creator that religions speak about. In order to believe in something divine like a God,