I would be interested to know what others think of my website , having spent some time on adding images and other information I realised that I have no idea how viewers react to it? there are also some pages relating to vintage photography. I know there are a lot of different opinions about what a website should look like, and I didn't want mine to look like many of the others that I see especially the flash type that take so long to load. I like it very much. For me some more info on the cameras would be nice and, of course, some more photos. You have the Anglican Cathedral in Liverpool but not the 'modern' RC one - perhaps some photos of that would make an interesting contrast? Not my cup of tea. I think it doesn't compete well with the slick photographer websites we have come to expect. I think this would have been great 10 years ago. Please do not take this as an offensive post, just my honest opinion. Looks like a website belonging to a photographer with a genuine love for his photography, with some beautiful images on show. I'm afraid though, it does seem like a site from the early days of the internet, and could benefit from the introduction of variation in tonality. As Eviscera bluntly states "All the images are brown." There's a website facility connected to this forum. I can't remember it's name though I'm sure someone else will!