evidence to back it up. Another member of his immediate family also phoned me at home many years ago to lambast me for an article I wrote on Hiroshima, Nagasaki. She knew nothing about it, but argued until I hung up. The last survivor who was in both bombings died earlier this year; an extremely old man. Hormesis anyone? I could go on and on about this guy. I see red, whenever his name pops up. He did a 'Nature' type program on rising sea levels on CBC (Canadian Broadcarping Castration) some years ago. I was mightily amused to find that every last second of his program was shot in the areas of the mediterranean that illustrated his fatuous belief by land subsidence. Again, some scientist! TomRude, you are certainly entitled to your opinion. Dr. Ball has stood against an absolute (snip)-storm for better than thirty years. That takes some cobbles. He is eminently qualified in the courage department as well as the climate department. You may want to add that to your calculations. Trying to figure out which camp you are in. The complaint about Suzuki's behavior is not impressive. That could have been due to many reasons. The disturbing thing is how he is combining his science and ideological extremism into a political force that is undermining Canadian civil life. That is much more in line with his calls for criminalization of political disagreement with is climate extremism. David Suzuki has a regular newspaper column in the Georgia