were filled with innocents. Before I go even further, let's connect this with a similar bombing in Hamburg, Germany. So Germany was bombed by a joint effort with the USAF and the RAF and well, the bombing had some drastic effects such as a town being destroyed along with the causality rate being in the thousands. Talk about terror bombing. Now, let's compare that to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The war was prolonged than expected and the US needed to end it as soon as possible. So, pretty much they sent out a bomb that would destroy two cities and kill thousands of innocents. Terror bombing level 2000 in my opinion. Rather than thinking about this in a military aspect where we should end the war as quick as possible, we need to think about this "morally" where we should take into account that not all Japanese aren't the savaged "banzai-charged" soldiers who are going to threaten us. I personally think that the inquisition of Japanese Americans was enough for those who were completely innocent in the involvement of any Japanese-related terror plots. Is it really worth winning a war that can lead to the death of innocents? Isn't the intention of war to attack the "bad people" and not "innocent people"? I mean, if you want a more up to date approach, watch that viral video of the US soldiers shooting up innocents in Iraq. Is that justified? If so, then no offense but something is wrong with you. It