really really great. It looks at not only advanced technological changes, but true social changes from the bottom up, which is rare. I liked his concepts of reforming the way opinion fits into society. Democracy has proven that the masses can not actually be trusted to make the best choices for themselves and others(example: 2 terms of Bush). However it apears this idea is imcomplete. In the end of the movie he is discussing how everyone will come together at these community 'science fairs,' if you will, and contributes their opinion on what other people are working on. I do believe that opinion can not, and should not be done away with. But not all opinions are valid. Many are formed with no consideration. Somehow the utilization of opinions needs to be reformed. But the main problem I see with his future society is that it still appears to be based on consumption. The earth does not have enough resaources to produce the limitless supplies he speaks of. A society that is truely better than ours will produce what people need to live a basically comfortable life, and no more. We dont need amusment parks in our trains, expecially when they're travelling 3000 miles per hour, or whatever he said. Once society improves it will not be about achieving the maximum amount of comfort, and destroying all conflict. That sounds too much like Brave New World. Conflict makes us grow, and after the basic necessities of life are met, more