with a fully updated set of maps (topo maps too) which knocks spots off anything like Google Maps etc etc. eterpulmonary so in situations where camera movement is not an issue #808 is better. when handheld, moving, in low light point and shoot, 920 is better. obviously, for a mobile phone, 920 has the better camera. the powerful camera in #808 really is not suitable for a mobile phone, rather is suited for a digital pro camera. this seems to be an example of how nokia could produce wonderful technology but failed to market it properly until the new ceo came in to guide them. i wonder what other gems they have in the lab. This one fits my case, so yeah, the camera faking is least of my concern. I'm more interested in the other cards of WP8?s features Microsoft still hold and wait until the competitors finished opening theirs LPHeadstrong So you can't zoom in while recording video? That's seems like a basic function! TheVULGAR you can, but not optically but digitally.. ttp://www.facebook.com/jill.banks.900 Jill Banks Folks the 920 isn't even in the same ballpark as far as image quality to the Pureview 808. You can find many picture and video examples online and compare the two. As far as movement goes who the hell is running and taking pictures at the same time? Most people are trying to be as still as possible when taking pics either way. Nokia could have done better with the 920. Even the