developed the perfect style for a troll but I can only say that because of the way you and others respond with such vitriol. Some of his work is lame, occasionally he is a hoot, but I kind of like the way he has challenged himself to reply always to Author's subject with pertinent verse; with that brief it is some wonder he does not fail more often and little wonder he struggles for consistent position in a debate. JohnnieCanuck says: November 15, 2012 at 3:36 am ..... At least he'll recognise the sky scraper for what it is, but not much of the rest, methinks. OUCH! Nice one, Johnny Walter, Nassar doesn't rile me at all, I find him highly amusing and actually enjoy his contributions to each comic. I've said before that I see him as the 'acceptable face of Trollism'; he doesn't rant and rave IN great BLOCK CAPS POSTS or threaten us all with lakes of fire and such shit, and I've also recognised that the ideas behind his 'poetry' are often very clever, even if the execution doesn't always do the ideas justice. FreeFox, I think it's King Canute's nom-de-plume. I was only wondering the other night where you'd got to. Pleased to see you here again. I assume you've been busy with that cub of yours. Walter I've just realised that you might have thought that my comment about 'rats and religion' was aimed at Nassar, hence your reference to vitriol. That part of