looked like a 60?s idea of the world of tomorrow. The architecture looks so much like Thunderbirds if you get where I'm going with this. The Tennis courts made me chuckle though, I mean, why Tennis? Why not some other sport or leisure facility like a football pitch for example. I can think of so many ways this can be improved upon but it does look like a very good starting point. That said, how do you test something like this? Another thing, the centre of the city layout is a huge scientific research facility and university right? But is that really the best use of that space? If you have thousands of these cities all with hugely powerful supercomputers would that much extra science really be needed? Of course, increasing the knowledge of the citizens in such a utopia would be very welcome. Andrew Wow. This is how i always thought society should function. I love how his ideas actually make sense. And he uses everything in equilibrium and sustainability. He doesn't forget about the environment, or how people behave based on their environment. He may well be the smartest person I've ever seen. Applying the scientific method and scientific organization to society and cities is genius. I like how he designed city's with a nucleus and designed things like nature. If it works in nature, why wouldn't it work in technological city's? Hesus @ Cliff First circular designs are usually problematic for optimal use of space. Purely for