this offence': Bryant [1999] NSWCCA 181 . In Alexander (1995) 78 A Crim R 141 Hunt J said that the 3 particular matters which have to be taken into account in provocation cases are: the degree of provocation (which when great reduces the objective gravity of the offence); the time between the provocation and the loss of self-control (which when short reduces the objective gravity of the offence); and the degree of violence or aggression shown by the offender Alexander also contains a useful survey of sentences in provocation cases. 'Momentary inattention' has been defined widely to include driving which is not driving with a selfish disregard to the safety of others, or recklessly, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol: Pyritz (NSW CCA 23/11/98). Not all cases can be categorized as either cases of abandonment of responsibility or momentary inattention; those are two extremes on a continuum of culpability (Khatter [2000] NSWCCA 32 , Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 ). A more lenient approach was taken in Mansour [1999] NSWCCA 180 . There is a useful summary of sentences for reasonably bad culpable drivings in Vukic [2003] NSWCCA 13 and also in Vale [2004] NSWCCA 469 . There is a summary of very bad culpable driving cases in Bombadieri [2010] NSWCCA 161 . In that case a sentence of 10 years with a NPP of 6.5 years (at the time the highest sentence for a single count of culpable driving) was reduced to 9 years with a NPP of