security framing embodies are suitable for progressive campaigning -- justice, interdependence, concern for vulnerable populations and the right to be free from harm -- the term 'security' itself should be avoided, as the associations with negative values are too strong. So the key to using the security frame successfully is to use 'human security' as an organising principle, but not to use the term itself prominently. The media research conducted for our briefing Communicating Climate Change and Migration found that there is not yet a dominant frame in media reporting of climate change and migration. Certain framings were, however, linked predominantly to particular terminology. Use of the word 'security' was commonly associated with articles that described 'refugees', much less so with articles that talked about 'migrants'. Looking more closely at the articles that used a security framing, approximately half used a 'human security' framing (i.e. food and water security, safety and welfare of vulnerable populations) the other half used a 'national security' framing (i.e. potential for conflict, border protection and threats from 'outsiders'), with an equal split for both the 'migrant' and 'refugee' search terms. These results suggest that -- in the same way that there is not yet a dominant media frame for reporting about climate change and migration -- the security frame has not yet become strongly associated with one particular set of values. This means that there is a genuine window of opportunity for pro-actively influencing the language and framing of climate change and migration in the