watch the video above. Dawkins uses several arguments in the God Delusion, and they all fail miserably, as Craig demonstrates beyond reasonable doubt. The claim that god exists is extraordinary, but the evidence is anything but. More begging the question. There's nothing extraordinary about the claim that God exists unless you have presupposed that he doesn't. And if God exists, then the claim that he doesn't is the most extraordinary claim you could come up with. It would not surprise me if I were blocked or my comments not allowed really. Your comments will be blocked if you continue to present assertions and insults instead of arguments and evidence. This is what sheltered thinking does. It cuts itself off from the real world and convinces itself that that was the real world's fault. Considering your obvious ignorance of just about every topic we've discussed here; considering that Stuart and I have clearly spent a lot more time than you have investigating the evidence for and against God; and considering (if your performance is anything to go by) that we have also spent a great deal more time debating hostile interlocutors than you have, this sort of rhetoric is not only unbecoming of an adult, but positively laughable. I dunno, maybe you're still in high school. That would explain and excuse a lot. But in the real world, this sort of psychoanalysis is just passive-aggressive bullshit. I can also say that it would not surprise me if you stopped posting here