in such wise that that of which I speak is one simple light. The universal form of this knot I believe that I saw because in saying this I feel that I rejoice more spaciously. [23] But Dante found that this unity of which he dreamed and in which he believed was not capable of human expression. He confesses : Thenceforward my vision was greater than our speech which yields to such a sight and the memory yields to such excess. [24] Beyond doubt Professor Small will be inclined to treat lightly both the implied poetical and theological attributes of his proposed science of sociology. But he may not attempt to escape these implications through resort to such expressions as "the science of human personality," "interpretation of the process of becoming," "synthetic, co-ordinating conception," etc., etc. All social sciences are sciences of human personality ; but a complete expression of human personality would not be science. All social sciences are interpretations of the process of becoming, but the attempt to interpret this process as such in terms of any extra-experiential end or ideal of life is theological rather than scientific in its essential nature. All sciences are synthetic, co-ordinating studies ; but there can be no final or absolute synthesis of these synthetic studies, except on the basis of some extra-scientific presupposition -- same standard of values intuitively or authoritatively established. In order, then, that we may have new cause to "rejoice more spaciously," Professor Small must invent other phases