articles attributed only to the Daily Mail Reporter? Not to mention that Platell exists purely to spread hate -- in fact, she's so good at her job that the Mail have even had to issue apologies for her articles in the past: A column by Amanda Platell on 17 September 2011 referred to Sheryl Gascoigne as a 'gold digger' and as 'sleazy and degrading company' for the other participants in the Leveson Inquiry. We now accept that these allegations are entirely unfounded and went beyond fair comment. We have sincerely apologised to Ms Gascoigne in court for the distress caused and have agreed to pay her substantial damages and costs. You know you're spreading some hate when even the 'only-apologise-when-forced-to-in-a-cour\\... Daily Mail feels that a columnist has gone 'beyond fair comment'. Platell does reserve a special hatred for Twitter (maybe it's that Twitter hate is seen as competition) in the past she has dismissed Twitter as 'the domain of the inane, the insane and the desperate' whilst declaring: In a civilised democracy, the idiots who use Twitter should be banned from voting altogether. At least Twitter trolls do it for the love of hate, rather than the money. The Daily Mail likes stories about Hitler and even after over 60 years of revelations regarding the dead dictator it always seems like their is fresh information to raise the interest of the newspaper that quite like fascism back in the day (and, arguably, still does). The story is of no consequence