of discussion, let's assume he did that. So what? How is it evidence for your imaginary god that you NEVER, EVER provide evidence? "Its always off topic when they get showed up." Liar - he never wrote that it was off-topic nor did he imply it. "Now DPK when challenged on atheist morals refuses to provide a reasonable answer but instead asks a stupid question." Again, liar, there's no such thing as "atheist morals" to challenge. And in your case, apparently there's no such thing as xtian morals. "Let me answer for them." Except that you didn't answer anything - you only made an unsubstantiated claim. "Richard Dawkins in his book claims no absolute morality while proceeding to claim case by case absolute morality all throughout his book." "Great job cutting anony down to size. Let us recap. He tells another poster he doesn't understand his own beliefs." What I said was his professed beliefs contradict that of the Roman Catholic Church, of which he professes to be a member. I never said he didn't understand his own beliefs... lie #1. "You set him straight and he then goes on to say the thread is off topic! ha ha ha" Show me where I said the thread is off topic. Lie #2. I asked which Catholic sect was correct. I received no answer... so much for being "set straight" Lie #3. "Its always off topic when they get showed up." But we notice that you haven't answered ANY of the