do for your god." I don't know where you got any of this from. I don't know the evidence for Vishnu. Is there some? Do the disciples of Vishnu offer any? I don't know the expectation of there being more evidence than there is if Vishnu existed. What I do know, and this was the point if you recall, is that for Christianity there is no expectation that the evidence for God, if God exists, should be more than the amount of evidence there appears to be now. If you're going to continue with this argument that the supposed lack of evidence for God's existence is evidence that he does not exist, then the burden of proving that point (that there is expectation of more evidence if God does exist) is placed solidly and squarely on your shoulders. Re the field of cosmology: It is acceptable practice for any layman to survey the experts with the relevant expertise to see where the majority stand on the issue in order to conclude that it is reasonable to believe said issue. So I don't need understanding of the field of cosmology. I just need an understanding that the field is generally united in their belief that the universe began to exist in order for me to conclude that belief is reasonable. And thats what we have. That GR breaks down for a singularity is not new news -- everyone always knew that. Quantum physics will need to be introduced at the point