necessarily mean that this aggravating factor applies: Fahs [2007] NSWCCA 26 at para [21] . The aggravating factor may arise even if there was only one offender: Hewitt [2007] NSWCCA 353 where cases on this aggravating factor are summarised at para [25]. The level of planning must exceed that which would ordinarily be expected in an offence of that kind: Knight v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 51 . Downloading large amounts of pornography from the internet does not mean that the offence was part of a planned or organized criminal activity: Saddler v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 83 . Mitigating Factors Under s. 21A Under s. 21A the following mitigating factors are to be taken into account (a) the injury, emotional harm, loss or damage caused by the offence was not substantial, (b) the offence was not part of a planned or organized criminal activity, (c) the offender was provoked by the victim, (d) the offender was acting under duress, (e) the offender does not have any record (or any significant record) of previous convictions, (f) the offender was a person of good character, (g) the offender is unlikely to re-offend, (h) the offender has good prospects of rehabilitation, whether by reason of the offender's age or otherwise, (i) the remorse shown by the offender for the offence, but only if: (i) the offender has provided evidence that he or she has accepted responsibility for his or her actions, and (ii) the offender has acknowledged any injury, loss or damage caused by