all have force, but the P3 resisted debate on them at any stage in the Security Council itself, and other Council members were never given sufficient information to enable them to be evaluated. Maybe not all the BRICS are to be believed when they say that, had better process been followed, more common ground could have been achieved.  But they can be when they say they feel bruised by the P3's dismissiveness during the Libyan campaign -- and that those bruises will have to heal before any consensus can be expected on tough responses to such situations in the future. The good news is that there is a way forward, and it is Brazil that has shown the way, in the argument it has been promoting over the last year that the R2P concept, as it has evolved so far, needs supplementing by a new set of principles and procedures  which it calls "responsibility while protecting" ("RWP"). When stripped down to its bare essentials, RWP involves three core propositions: --   First, R2P, as endorsed in 2005 and as refined since, remains a valuable normative advance, not least in its strong focus on prevention of, as well as reaction to mass atrocity crimes, and whatever the issues involved in its  practical implementation, particularly in relation to the use of military force, the baby should not be thrown out with the bathwater: RWP is designed to complement R2P, not replace it. --   Second, before acting under Pillar III of R2P, and under