Translate the text from Welsh to English.



 
Cais i fwrdd iechyd neu Bwyllgor Gwasanaethau Iechyd Arbenigol Cymru (WHSSC) yw Cais Cyllido Claf Unigol (IPFR) i gyllido gofal iechyd i gleifion sydd y tu allan i’r rhychwant gwasanaethau a thriniaethau y mae corff GIG yn eu darparu fel rheol. Gall IPFR fod ar gyfer pob math o ofal iechyd, gan gynnwys gwasanaeth, triniaeth, meddyginiaeth, dyfais neu ddarn offer penodol. Ceir ychydig o gannoedd o IPFR bob blwyddyn a derbynnir y rhan fwyaf.


Yn sgil yr adolygiad IPFR yn 2014 a gweithredu ei argymhellion, efallai y bydd Aelodau yn cofio imi gytuno yn 2016 bod yr adeg yn iawn ar gyfer adolygiad newydd, annibynnol o’r broses IPFR. Roedd gan y grŵp o arbenigwyr annibynnol a gynhaliodd yr adolygiad rychwant o arbenigedd a gwybodaeth berthnasol a hwythau yn unig oedd yn gyfrifol am gynnwys eu hadroddiad, eu canfyddiadau a’u hargymhellion. Derbyniais bob un o’r 27 o argymhellion – yr oedd rhai ohonynt yn cymeradwyo ac yn adeiladu ar ymarfer da cyfredol yn y GIG – ac ymrwymais i’w gweithredu.


Ymhlith y newidiadau a gafwyd o’u herwydd yr oedd gwella mynediad i wybodaeth am y broses IPFR i glinigwyr ac i gleifion; darparu mwy o hyfforddiant i glinigwyr am y broses IPFR a’r prosesau y mae cyrff GIG yn eu defnyddio i gomisiynu gwasanaethau mewn byrddau iechyd eraill; sefydlu Grŵp Cynghori Sicrhau Ansawdd GIG Cymru (QAAG) i fonitro prosesau IPFR y cyrff GIG a symleiddio’r broses.


Mae’r QAAG yn adolygu sampl o IPFR o bob corff GIG bob chwe mis. Mae’r Grŵp yn ystyried y dilynir y broses IPFR yn unol â’r polisi IPFR yn gyffredinol.


Un arall o’r argymhellion oedd adolygu’r meini prawf y mae panel IPFR corff GIG yn eu defnyddio i asesu IPFR drwy ei wneud yn ofynnol i’r clinigwr ddangos yr enillai claf fudd clinigol arwyddocaol am werth rhesymol am arian i GIG Cymru, yn hytrach na dangos bod gan glaf eithriadoldeb clinigol. Yr adroddiad blynyddol diweddaraf am y broses IPFR (https://www.awttc.org/ipfr) yw’r cyntaf ar gyfer blwyddyn lawn ers adolygu’r canllawiau IPFR ym mis Mehefin 2017\.


Bu nifer yr IPFR yn disgyn ers 2015 ac mae’r nifer fach yn 2018\-19 (358\) yn golygu y byddai’n anodd cyffredinoli neu dynnu casgliadau diffiniol am effaith y newidiadau a wnaethpwyd i’r broses IPFR. Eto i gyd mae’n dda gennyf adrodd y bu’r raddfa gymeradwyo am IPFR yn codi ers 2016\-17, gan gyrraedd y lefel uchaf hyd yn hyn \- 68% \- yn 2018\-19\. Bu’r raddfa gymeradwyo am IPFR i feddyginiaethau yn cynyddu dros y bedair blynedd ddiwethaf nes cyrraedd y lefel uchaf hyd yn hyn \- 71% \- y llynedd. Mae’r raddfa gymeradwyo i driniaethau heblaw meddyginiaethau wedi amrywio dros amser ond y llynedd cafwyd y raddfa gymeradwyo uchaf hyd yn hyn – 66%. Yn ogystal ag IPFR, yn 2018\-19, cafwyd 32 cais i barhau â’r cyllido, ar gyfer estyniadau i’r IPFR gwreiddiol. Cafwyd 28 i feddyginiaethau a chwech am driniaethau heblaw meddyginiaethau, sy’n nodi bod cleifion yn elwa o’r triniaethau y gofynnwyd amdanynt.


Rhan fach ond arwyddocaol o’r gwasanaethau y mae GIG Cymru yn eu darparu yw IPFR ac ni ddylid dibrisio eu heffaith ar gleifion. Credaf fod yr adolygiad annibynnol wedi gwella dealltwriaeth o’r broses IPFR i gleifion a chlinigwyr ill dau a bod y monitro cyson y mae’r QAAG yn ei gynnal yn golygu y gall cleifion a chlinigwyr fod yn gwbl hyderus y cynhelir IPFR i’r safonau uchaf.







Translation:


 
An IPFR is a request to a health board or the Welsh Health Specialised Services Committee (WHSSC) to fund NHS healthcare for patients who fall outside the range of services and treatments that an NHS organisation routinely provides. An IPFR can cover any type of healthcare, including a specific service, treatment, medicine, device or piece of equipment. There are several hundred IPFRs every year and the majority are accepted.


Following the 2014 IPFR review and the implementation of its recommendations, Members may recall that in 2016 I had agreed the time was right for a new, independent review of the IPFR process. The group of independent experts who carried out the review comprised a range of relevant expertise and knowledge and had sole responsibility for the content of their report, their findings and their recommendations. I accepted all of the 27 recommendations – several of which endorsed and built on existing good practice in the NHS in Wales – and committed to implementing them.


Changes introduced as a result included improving access to information about the IPFR process for clinicians and patients; providing more training for clinicians about the IPFR process and the processes NHS organisations use to commission services in other health boards; establishing the NHS Wales Quality Assurance Advisory Group (QAAG) to monitor NHS organisations’ IPFR processes and streamlining the process.


The QAAG reviews a sample of IPFRs from all NHS organisations every 6 months. The group considers that overall the IPFR process is being followed in line with IPFR policy.


Another of the recommendations was to revise the criteria an NHS organisation’s IPFR panel use to assess an IPFR by requiring the clinician to show a patient would gain significant clinical benefit at reasonable value for money for the NHS, rather than showing that a patient had clinical exceptionality. The latest annual report about the IPFR process is the first to cover a full year since the IPFR guidance was revised in June 2017\.


The number of IPFRs made has been falling since 2015 and the small number in 2018\-19 (358\) means it would be difficult to generalise or draw definitive conclusions about the impact of the changes made to the IPFR process. Nonetheless, I am pleased to report the approval rate for all IPFRs has been rising since 2016\-17, reaching the highest level to date \- 68% \- in 2018\-19\. Similarly, the approval rate for medicine IPFRs has been increasing for the past 4 years reaching the highest level to date \- 71% \- last year. The approval rate for non\-medicine IPFRs has varied over time but last year’s approval rate \- 66% \- is the highest to date. As well as IPFRs, in 2018\-19, there were 34 continued funding requests, to fund extensions to original IPFRs. Of these, there were 28 for medicines and 6 for non\-medicines, which indicate that patients were benefitting from the requested treatments.


IPFRs are a small but significant part of the services NHS Wales provides and their impact on patients should not be underestimated. I believe the independent review has improved understanding of the IPFR process for both patients and clinicians and the regular monitoring being undertaken by the QAAG means that patients and clinicians can have every confidence that IPFRs are being carried out to the highest standards.