Translate the text from English to Welsh.



 
The Counsel General, Mick Antoniw said:



> The High Court yesterday handed down judgment in the above matter. The Court concluded that the UK Government does not have power to give notice under Article 50 for the UK to withdraw from the European Union using the Crown prerogative.  
> 
>   
> 
> It has been widely announced that this matter will be the subject of an appeal to the Supreme Court before the end of the year. In parallel, the High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland recently gave judgment in the matter of Re McCord’s Application. Again, it is widely understood that this matter will ultimately be joined to the proceedings before the Supreme Court.  
> 
>   
> 
> Having considered the judgments in both matters, I consider that they raise issues of profound importance not only in relation to the concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty but also in relation to the wider constitutional arrangements of the United Kingdom and the legal framework for devolution.  
> 
>   
> 
> They raise questions about the use of the prerogative power to take steps which will or may impact on:  
> 
> • the legislative competence of the National Assembly for Wales;  
> 
> • the powers of the Welsh Ministers;  
> 
> • the legal and constitutional relationships of the Assembly to Parliament;  
> 
> • the legal and constitutional relationships of the Welsh Government to the UK Government; and  
> 
> • the social and economic impact on Wales.  
> 
>   
> 
> Therefore, in accordance with my power under section 67 of the Government of Wales Act 2006, I intend to make an application to be granted permission to intervene in the proposed appeal before the Supreme Court. My intention is to make representations about the specific implications of the government’s proposed decision for Wales.  
> 
>   
> 
> I will make an oral statement to the Assembly next week.







Translation:


 
Meddai Mick Antoniw:

 
> Mae’r Uchel Lys wedi rhoi ei ddyfarniad ar yr achos uchod ddoe. Daeth y Llys i’r casgliad nad oes gan Lywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig y pŵer i roi rhybudd o dan Erthygl 50 y bydd yn ymadael â’r Undeb Ewropeaidd gan ddefnyddio uchelfraint y Goron.  
>   
> Cyhoeddwyd y bydd yr achos hwn yn destun apêl i’r Goruchaf Lys cyn diwedd y flwyddyn. Ochr yn ochr â hyn, rhoddodd Uchel Lys Cyfiawnder Gogledd Iwerddon ei ddyfarniad ar achos Re McCord’s (Raymond) Application yn ddiweddar. Unwaith eto, mae’n dra hysbys y caiff y mater hwn ei gyfuno yn y pen draw â’r achos gerbron y Goruchaf Lys.  
>   
> A minnau wedi ystyried y dyfarniad ar y ddau achos, rwyf o’r farn eu bod yn codi pynciau sydd o bwysigrwydd mawr, nid yn unig mewn perthynas â’r cysyniad o Sofraniaeth Seneddol, ond hefyd mewn perthynas â threfniadau cyfansoddiadol ehangach y Deyrnas Unedig a’r fframwaith cyfreithiol ar gyfer datganoli.   
>   
> Maent yn codi cwestiynau ynglŷn â’r defnydd o’r pŵer uchelfreiniol i gymryd camau a fydd yn effeithio, neu a all effeithio, ar y canlynol:  
> • cymhwysedd deddfwriaethol Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru;  
> • pwerau Gweinidogion Cymru;  
> • y berthynas gyfreithiol a’r berthynas gyfansoddiadol rhwng y Cynulliad a Senedd y Deyrnas Unedig;  
> • y berthynas gyfreithiol a’r berthynas gyfansoddiadol rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Llywodraeth y Deyrnas Unedig;  
> • yr effaith gymdeithasol a’r effaith economaidd ar Gymru.  
>   
> Felly, yn unol â’r pŵer a roddir imi o dan adran 67 o Ddeddf Llywodraeth Cymru 2006, rwy’n bwriadu gwneud cais am ganiatâd i ymyrryd yn yr apêl arfaethedig gerbron y Goruchaf Lys. Bwriadaf gyflwyno sylwadau am oblygiadau penodol penderfyniad arfaethedig y Llywodraeth i Gymru.  
>   
> Byddaf yn rhoi datganiad llafar i’r Cynulliad yr wythnos nesaf.