AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System [United States]:  CJEE Extracts File, 1982  

These criminal justice expenditure and employment (CJEE)
 data are taken from a special compilation of sources available from
 the Census Bureau's Annual Surveys of Governments, Finance Statistics
 and Employment Statistics. Levels of government covered are federal,
 state, county, municipal, and towns and townships. Information is
 included on total employment, total police protection, police
 protection with arrest powers, other police protection, judicial-legal
 employment, corrections employment, total expenditures, police
 protection expenditures, judicial-legal expenditures, and corrections
 expenditures. Types of expenditures include direct current, capital
 outlay, equipment, and intergovernmental. Types of employment include
total, full-time, part-time, and full-time equivalent.
Directory of Law Enforcement Agencies, 1996:  [United States]  

To ensure an accurate sampling frame for its Law
 Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey,
 the Bureau of Justice Statistics periodically sponsors a census of the
 nation's state and local law enforcement agencies. This census, known
 as the Directory Survey, gathers data on 49 primary state law
 enforcement agencies and all sheriffs' departments, local police
 departments, and special police agencies (state or local) that are
 publicly funded and employ at least one sworn officer with general
 arrest powers. The 1996 Directory Survey collected data on the number
 of sworn and nonsworn personnel employed by each agency, including
 both full-time and part-time employees. Within the full-time sworn
 category, data were collected from all agencies on the number who were
 uniformed officers with regularly assigned duties that included
 responding to calls for service. For agencies with at least 10
 full-time sworn officers, the number whose primary duties were related
 to investigations, court operations, or jail operations was also
 obtained. This data collection, compiled in June 1996, represents the
 third such census, with the first occurring in 1986 (DIRECTORY OF LAW
 ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1986: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR 8696]) and the
 second in 1992 (DIRECTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1992: [UNITED
 STATES] [ICPSR 2266]). Variables include personnel totals, type of
 government, type of agency, and whether the agency had the legal
authority to hold a person beyond arraignment for 48 or more hours.
Capital Punishment in the United States, 1973-2002  

This data collection provides annual data on prisoners under
a sentence of death and prisoners whose offense sentences were commuted
or vacated during the period 1973-2002. Information is supplied for
basic sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, education, and
state of incarceration. Criminal history data include prior felony
convictions for criminal homicide and legal status at the time of the
capital offense. Additional information is available for inmates removed
from death row by year-end 2002 and for inmates who were executed.
Directory of Law Enforcement Agencies, 1992:  [United States]  

To ensure an accurate sampling frame for its Law
 Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey,
 the Bureau of Justice Statistics periodically sponsors a census of the
 nation's state and local law enforcement agencies. This census, known
 as the Directory Survey, gathers data on all police and sheriffs'
 departments that are publicly funded and employ at least one full-time
 or part-time sworn officer with general arrest powers. This data
 collection, compiled in July 1992, represents the second such census,
 with the first occurring in 1986 (DIRECTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
 AGENCIES, 1986: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR 8696]). Variables include
 personnel totals, type of agency, geographic location of agency, and
 whether the agency had the legal authority to hold a person beyond
arraignment for 48 or more hours.
Criminal Victimization and Perceptions of Community Safety in 12 United States Cities, 1998

This collection presents survey data from 12 cities in the
United States regarding criminal victimization, perceptions of
community safety, and satisfaction with local police. Participating
cities included Chicago, IL, Kansas City, MO, Knoxville, TN, Los
Angeles, CA, Madison, WI, New York, NY, San Diego, CA, Savannah, GA,
Spokane, WA, Springfield, MA, Tucson, AZ, and Washington, DC. The
survey used the current National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
questionnaire with a series of supplemental questions measuring the
attitudes in each city. Respondents were asked about incidents that
occurred within the past 12 months. Information on the following
crimes was collected: violent crimes of rape, robbery, aggravated
assault, and simple assault, personal crimes of theft, and household
crimes of burglary, larceny, and motor vehicle theft.
Part 1, Household-Level Data, covers the number of household
respondents, their ages, type of housing, size of residence, number of
telephone lines and numbers, and language spoken in the household.
Part 2, Person-Level Data, includes information on respondents' sex,
relationship to householder, age, marital status, education, race,
time spent in the housing unit, personal crime and victimization
experiences, perceptions of neighborhood crime, job and professional
demographics, and experience and satisfaction with local police.
Variables in Part 3, Incident-Level Data, concern the details of
crimes in which the respondents were involved, and the police response
to the crimes.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2009

The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2009. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1973-1977 [United States]: National Sample

These Commercial Victimization Surveys were collected as
part of the National Crime Surveys. They document burglary and robbery
incidents for all types of commercial establishments, as well as
political, cultural, and religious organizations. Business
characteristics gathered include form of ownership and operation, size
and type of business, and security measures. Information regarding the
reported incidents includes time and place, weapon involvement,
offender and entry characteristics, injuries and deaths, and type and
value of stolen property. Data were collected by calendar quarter for
four quarters in 1973-1976 and for two quarters in 1977, while the
actual incidents reported in the files reflect those occurring six
months prior to the interview date.
Commercial Victimization Surveys, 1972-1975 [United States]: Cities Sample

The National Crime Surveys, of which these Commercial
Victimization Surveys are a part, were conducted to obtain current and
reliable measures of serious crime in the United States. The
Commercial Victimization Surveys are restricted to coverage of
burglary and robbery incidents. They include all types of commercial
establishments as well as political, cultural, and religious
organizations. The survey includes a series of questions about the
business, e.g., type and size, form of ownership, insurance, security,
and break-in and robbery characteristics. Time and place, weapon,
injury, entry evidence, offender characteristics, and stolen property
data were collected for each of the incidents. Data on both victimized
and nonvictimized establishments in 26 different cities were collected
during 1972, 1973, and 1974. In the 1975 survey, data from the 13
cities surveyed during 1972 and 1973 were collected again.
Census of Tribal Justice Agencies, 2002

The study compiles data on the law enforcement, courts and
 administration, corrections and intermediate sanctions, criminal
 history records, and justice statistics of the federally recognized
 American Indian tribal governing bodies. The data determine which
 tribes have sworn law enforcement personnel and the source of
 authority, what the number and type of tribal court systems are, who
 performs the tribal detention function and what types of sanctions are
 imposed. It also looks at whether tribes have access to state and
national criminal record systems.
Census of State Felony Courts, 1985: [United States]

The purpose of this study was to provide a current listing
of all felony courts in this country and to provide a universe from
which a sample of courts could be selected based on felony caseload.
The study includes information on all state felony courts in the United
States, including the number of cases filed and disposed by conviction,
acquittal, dismissal, or other means. Court administrators were asked
to indicate the manner in which cases filed and disposed were counted,
such as by defendant, charge, or indictment information. The total
number of cases disposed during the period was also collected for
juvenile delinquents and for traffic offenses (moving violations) where
applicable. Finally, data were gathered on whether felonies reduced to
misdemeanors were included in the felony count and whether lower courts
in the jurisdiction accepted guilty pleas to felonies.
Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Training Academies, 2006

As of year-end 2006 a total of 648 state and local law
enforcement academies were providing basic training to
entry-level recruits in the United States. State agencies
approved 98 percent of these academies. This data collection describes
the academies in terms of their personnel, expenditures,
facilities, curricula, and trainees using data from the 2006
Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Training Academies (CLETA)
sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS).
The 2006 CLETA, like the initial 2002 study, collected data
from all state and local academies that provided basic law
enforcement training. Academies that provided only
in-service training, corrections and detention training, or
other special types of training were excluded. Federal training
academies were also excluded.
Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA), 2008

The BJS Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA) is conducted every 4 years to provide a complete enumeration of agencies and their employees. Employment data are reported by agencies for sworn and nonsworn (civilian) personnel and, within these categories, by full-time or part-time status. The pay period that included September 30, 2008, was the reference date for all personnel data.
Agencies also complete a checklist of functions they regularly perform, or have primary responsibility for, within the following areas: patrol and response, criminal investigation, traffic and vehicle-related functions, detention-related functions, court-related functions, special public safety functions (e.g., animal control), task force participation, and specialized functions (e.g., search and rescue).
The CSLLEA provides national data on the number of state and local law enforcement agencies and employees for local police departments, sheriffs' offices, state law enforcement agencies, and special jurisdiction agencies. It also serves as the sampling frame for BJS surveys of law enforcement agencies.
Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA), 2004 [United States]

To ensure an accurate sampling frame for its Law
Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey,
the Bureau of Justice Statistics sponsors a census of the
nation's state and local law enforcement agencies, known
as the Directory Survey. This census, which is conducted every four years, includes all state and local law enforcement
agencies operating nationwide that are publicly funded and employ at least one full-time or part-time sworn officer with general arrest powers. As in previous
years, the 2004 census collected data on the number of sworn
and nonsworn personnel employed by each agency, including both
full-time and part-time employees. The pay period that included September
30, 2004, was the reference date for all personnel data. Variables include personnel totals, type of government, type of agency, and whether the agency had the legal authority to hold a person beyond arraignment for 48 or more hours.
Previous censuses were conducted in 1986 (DIRECTORY OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1986: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR 8696]), 1992
(DIRECTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1992: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR
2266]), 1996 (DIRECTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1996: [UNITED
STATES] [ICPSR 2260]), and 2000 (Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA), 2000: [United States] [ICPSR 3484]).
Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA), 2000: [United States]

To ensure an accurate sampling frame for its Law
Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS) survey,
the Bureau of Justice Statistics periodically sponsors a census of the
nation's state and local law enforcement agencies. This census, known
as the Directory Survey, includes all state and local law enforcement
agencies that are publicly funded and employ at least one full-time or
part-time sworn officer with general arrest powers. As in previous
years, the 2000 Directory Survey collected data on the number of sworn
and nonsworn personnel employed by each agency, including both
full-time and part-time employees. The pay period that included June
30, 2000, was the reference date for all personnel data. A 97.4
percent response rate was obtained from the 17,784 state and local law
enforcement agencies operating in the United States. This data
collection contains June 2000 data from the fourth Directory Survey.
Previous directory censuses were conducted in 1986 (DIRECTORY OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1986: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR 8696]), 1992
(DIRECTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1992: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR
2266]), and 1996 (DIRECTORY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, 1996: [UNITED
STATES] [ICPSR 2260]). Variables include personnel totals, type of
government, type of agency, and whether the agency had the legal
authority to hold a person beyond arraignment for 48 or more hours.
Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities, 2005

This census is the seventh enumeration of state adult correctional institutions and the fourth of federal institutions sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics and conducted by the Bureau of the Census. Earlier censuses were completed in 1979 (ICPSR 7852), 1984 (ICPSR 8444), 1990 (ICPSR 9908), 1995 (ICPSR 6953), and 2000 (ICPSR 4021). For each facility, information was provided on physical security, age, functions, capacity, court orders for specific conditions, one-day counts and average populations, race/ethnicity of inmates, inmate work assignments, inmate deaths, special inmate counts, assaults, and incidents caused by inmates.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2001 [United States]

The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2001. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2002 [United States]

The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2002. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2003 [United States]

The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2003. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2004 [United States]

The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2004. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Offenders Admitted to Prison, 2001

The data contain records of sentenced offenders committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) during fiscal year 2001. The data include commitments of United States District Court, violators of conditions of release (e.g., parole, probation, or supervised release violators), offenders convicted in other courts (e.g., military or District of Columbia courts), and persons admitted to prison as material witnesses or for purposes of treatment, examination, or transfer to another authority. These data include variables that describe the offender, such as age, race, citizenship, as well as variables that describe the sentences and expected prison terms. The data file contains original variables from the Bureau of Prisons' SENTRY database, as well as "SAF" variables that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 7.9-7.16. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Criminal Appeals Cases Filed in Courts of Appeals, 2005 [United States]

The data contain records of criminal appeals cases filed in United States Courts of Appeals during fiscal year 2005. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts' (AOUSC) Court of Appeals file. These contain variables on the nature of the criminal appeal, the underlying offense, and the disposition of the appeal. An appeal can be filed by the government or the offender, and the appellant can appeal the sentence, the verdict, or both sentence and verdict. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 6.1-6.5. Variables containing information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.