AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 1999 Sample Survey of Law Enforcement Agencies

This survey, the fourth in the Bureau of Justice Statistics' program on Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), presents information on law enforcement agencies: state police, county police, special police (state and local), municipal police, and sheriff's departments. Variables include size of the population served by the police or sheriff's department, levels of employment and spending, various functions of the department, average salary levels for uniformed officers, policies and programs, and other matters related to management and personnel.
Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS): 1997 Sample Survey of Law Enforcement Agencies

This survey, the fourth in the Bureau of Justice Statistics' program on Law Enforcement and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), presents information on law enforcement agencies: state police, county police, special police (state and local), municipal police, and sheriff's departments. Variables include size of the population served by the police or sheriff's department, levels of employment and spending, various functions of the department, average salary levels for uniformed officers, policies and programs, and other matters related to management and personnel.
Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), 2007

Every three to four years, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) surveys a nationally
representative sample of state and local law enforcement agencies. The surveys
are conducted as part of the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative
Statistics (LEMAS) program. Data include agency
personnel, expenditures and pay, operations, community policing
initiatives, equipment, computers and information systems, and written
policies. The LEMAS survey has been conducted in 1987, 1990, 1993,
1997, 1999 (limited scope), 2000, 2003, and 2007.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2007 [United States]

The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2007 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), 1993

This survey, the third in the Bureau of Justice Statistics'
program on Law Enforcement and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS),
presents information on five types of general-purpose law enforcement
agencies: state police, county police, special police (state and local),
municipal police, and sheriff's departments. Variables include size of
the population served by the police or sheriff's department, levels of
employment and spending, various functions of the department, average
salary levels for uniformed officers, policies and programs, and other
matters related to management and personnel.
Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), 1990

This survey, the second in the Bureau of Justice Statistics' program on Law Enforcement and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), presents information on four types of general-purpose law enforcement agencies: state police, local police, special police, and sheriff's departments. Variables include size of the population served by the police or sheriff's department, levels of employment and spending, various functions of the department, average salary levels for uniformed officers, and other matters related to management and personnel.
Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), 1987

This survey, the first in the Bureau of Justice Statistics' program on Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics (LEMAS), presents information on three types of general purpose law enforcement agencies: state police, local police, and sheriffs' departments. Data from the primary state police agency in each of 49 states (Hawaii does not have a state police agency) are also presented. Variables include size of the populations served by the typical police or sheriffs' department, levels of employment and spending, various functions of the department, average salary levels for uniformed officers, and other matters relating to management and personnel.
Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk [United States], 2000

Researchers have long been able to analyze crime and law
enforcement data at the individual agency level (see UNIFORM CRIME
REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR 9028]) and at the
county level (see, for example, UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA
[UNITED STATES]: COUNTY-LEVEL DETAILED ARREST AND OFFENSE DATA, 1997
[ICPSR 2764]). However, analyzing crime data at the intermediate
level, the city or place, has been difficult. To facilitate the
creation and analysis of place-level data, the Bureau of Justice
Statistics (BJS) and the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
(NACJD) created the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk. The
crosswalk file was designed to provide geographic and other
identification information for each record included in either the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) files or
BJS's Directory of Law Enforcement Agencies.  The main variables for
each record are the UCR originating agency identifier number, agency
name, mailing address, Census Bureau's government identification
number, UCR state and county codes, and Federal Information Processing
Standards (FIPS) state, county, and place codes. These variables make
it possible for researchers to take police agency-level data, combine
them with Bureau of the Census and BJS data, and perform place-level,
jurisdiction-level, and government-level analyses.
Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk [United States], 1996     

Researchers have long been able to analyze crime and law
enforcement data at the individual agency level (see UNIFORM CRIME
REPORTING PROGRAM DATA: [UNITED STATES] [ICPSR 9028]) and at the
county level (see, for example, UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING PROGRAM DATA
[UNITED STATES]: COUNTY-LEVEL DETAILED ARREST AND OFFENSE DATA, 1997
[ICPSR 2764]). However, analyzing crime data at the intermediate
level, the city or place, has been difficult. To facilitate the
creation and analysis of place-level data, the Bureau of Justice
Statistics (BJS) and the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data
(NACJD) created the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk. The
crosswalk file was designed to provide geographic and other
identification information for each record included in either the
Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) files or
BJS's Directory of Law Enforcement Agencies. The main variables for
each record are the UCR originating agency identifier number, agency
name, mailing address, Census Bureau's government identification
number, UCR state and county codes, and Federal Information Processing
Standards (FIPS) state, county, and place codes. These variables make
it possible for researchers to take police agency-level data, combine
them with Bureau of the Census and BJS data, and perform place-level,
jurisdiction-level, and government-level analyses.
Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1977

The 1977 Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility
Census, is the fifth in a series of surveys of state and local public
residential facilities in the juvenile justice system. There is one
record for each juvenile detention facility that had a population of
at least 50 percent juveniles. Each record is classified into one of
six categories: detention centers or shelters, reception or diagnostic
centers, training schools, ranches, forestry camps and farms, and
halfway houses and group homes. Data include state, county, and city
identification, level of government responsible for the facility, type
of agency, agency identification, resident population by sex, age
range, detention status, and offense, admissions and departures of
population, average length of stay, staffing and expenditures, age and
capacity of the facility, and programs and services available.
Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1975

The 1975 census includes juvenile detention and
correctional facilities that were operated by state or local
governments in November, 1975, and had been in operation at least a
month prior to June 30, 1975. There is one record for each juvenile
detention facility that had a population of at least 50 percent
juveniles. Each record is classified into one of six categories:
detention centers or shelters, reception or diagnostic centers,
training schools, ranches, forestry camps and farms, and halfway
houses and group homes. Data include state, county, and city
identification, level of government responsible for the facility, type
of agency, agency identification, resident population by sex, age
range, detention status, and offense, admissions and departures of
population, average length of stay, staffing and expenditures, age and
capacity of the facility, and programs and services available.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2008 [United States]

The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2008 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1974

The 1974 census includes juvenile detention and
correctional facilities that were operated by state or local
governments in November 1974, and had been in operation for at least a
month prior to June 30, 1974. There is one record for each juvenile
detention facility that had a population of at least 50 percent
juveniles. Each record is classified into one of six categories:
detention centers or shelters, reception or diagnostic centers,
training schools, ranches, forestry camps and farms, and halfway
houses and group homes. Data include state, county, and city
identification, level of government responsible for the facility, type
of agency, agency identification, resident population by sex, age
range, detention status, and offense, admissions and departures of
population, average length of stay, staffing and expenditures, age and
capacity of the facility, and programs and services available.
Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1973

This survey provides information on the characteristics and
 administration of juvenile detention and correctional facilities. Six
 types of facilities are covered in this study: (1) detention centers,
 (2) shelters, (3) reception or diagnostic centers, (4) ranches,
 forestry camps, and farms, (5) halfway houses and group homes, and (6)
 training schools. Survey items include facility capacity, number of
 full-and part-time staff, number of admissions and discharges, average
 quarterly population, and expenditures by the facility. Data for
facility residents include age and sex, and average length of stay.
Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facility Census, 1971

The purpose of this census was to provide information on
juvenile detention centers throughout the United States. The data
include information on type of facility, level of government
administering the facility, resident population by sex, by age range,
by detention status, and by offense, admissions and discharges,
average length of stay, staffing and expenditures, age and capacity of
facility, and programs and services available.
Juvenile Defendants in Criminal Courts (JDCC):  Survey of 40 Counties in the United States, 1998  

This is an independent sample of juvenile defendants drawn
from the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) for 1998 (see ICPSR
2038). SCPS 1998 tracked felony cases filed in May 1998 until final
disposition or until one year had elapsed from the date of filing.
SCPS 1998 presents data on felony cases filed in approximately
40 of the nation's 75 most populous counties in 1998. These 75
counties account for more than a third of the United States population
and approximately half of all reported crimes. The cases from these 40
jurisdictions were weighted to represent all felony filings during the
month of May in the 75 most populous counties. Data were collected on
arrest charges, demographic characteristics, criminal history,
pretrial release and detention, adjudication, and sentencing. Within
each sampled site, data were gathered on each juvenile felony
case. Cases were tracked through adjudication or for up to one
year. The source used to identify the upper age for juveniles and the
filing mechanism appropriate to each state was the OJJDP publication,
Trying Juveniles as Adults in Criminal Court: An Analysis of State
Transfer Provisions (December 1998).
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants in Federal Criminal Cases in District Court -- Pending, 2009

The data contain records of defendants in criminal cases filed in United States District Court before or during fiscal year 2009 and still pending as of year-end. The data were constructed from the Administrative Office of the United States District Courts' (AOUSC) criminal file. Defendants in criminal cases may be either individuals or corporations. There is one record for each defendant in each case filed. Included in the records are data from court proceedings and offense codes for up to five offenses charged at the time the case was filed. (The most serious charge at termination may differ from the most serious charge at case filing, due to plea bargaining or action of the judge or jury.) In a case with multiple charges against the defendant, a "most serious" offense charge is determined by a hierarchy of offenses based on statutory maximum penalties associated with the charges. The data file contains variables from the original AOUSC files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, Tables 4.1-4.5 and 5.1-5.6. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Historical Statistics on Prisoners in State and Federal institutions, Yearend 1925-1986: [United States]

This data collection supplies annual data on the size of
 the prison population and the size of the general population in the
 United States for the period 1925 to 1986. These yearend counts
 include tabulations for prisons in each of the 50 states and the
 District of Columbia, as well as the federal prisons, and are intended
 to provide a measure of the overall size of the prison population. The
 figures were provided from a voluntary reporting program in which each
 state, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons
 reported summary statistics as part of the statistical information on
prison populations in the United States.
Federal Justice Statistics Program: Defendants Charged in Criminal Cases Filed in District Court, 2007 [United States]

The data contain records of defendants in federal criminal cases filed in United States District Court during fiscal year 2007. The data were constructed from the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) Central System file. According to the EOUSA, the United States attorneys conduct approximately 95 percent of the prosecutions handled by the Department of Justice. The Central System data contain variables from the original EOUSA files as well as additional analysis variables, or "SAF" variables, that denote subsets of the data. These SAF variables are related to statistics reported in the Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics. Variables containing identifying information (e.g., name, Social Security Number) were replaced with blanks, and the day portions of date fields were also sanitized in order to protect the identities of individuals. These data are part of a series designed by the Urban Institute (Washington, DC) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Data and documentation were prepared by the Urban Institute.
Gender of Prisoners Admitted to State and Federal Institutions in the United States, 1926-1987

This data collection includes tabulations of annual adult
 admissions to federal and state correctional institutions by gender
 for the years 1926 through 1987. The two data files have identical
 structures: Part 1 includes information on male admissions, and Part 2
 includes information on female admissions. The 3,348 cases in each
 part include one case for each of the 62 years of the collection for
 each of the following 54 categories: the 50 states, the District of
 Columbia, federal institutional totals, state cumulative totals, and
 United States totals (the sum of the federal and state cumulative
 totals). The figures were drawn from a voluntary reporting program in
 which each state, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of
 Prisons reported summary and detailed statistics, as part of the
 National Prisoner Statistics reporting series. Each file also includes
individual state and United States general population figures.
Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics (FCCPS)

The Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics (FCCPS) data tool is an interface that can be used to analyze federal case processing data. Users can generate various statistics in the areas of federal law enforcement, prosecution/courts, and incarceration from 1998. Users can also look up data based on title and section of the U.S. Criminal Code from 1994. This data tool includes offenders held for violating federal laws. It excludes commitments from the D.C. Superior Court.
Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System: CJEE Longitudinal File, 1971-1979, 1985, 1988   

This survey provides criminal justice expenditure and
 employment (CJEE) data for all states and counties in the United
 States, certain municipal governments, and Puerto Rico. Specific
 variables include full- and part-time employees and payroll,
 expenditures for current operations, capital outlay, equipment,
 construction, land, and contributions to employee benefits, and
 intergovernmental expenditures paid to state and local
 governments. Sectors represented in this survey include police
 protection, judicial, legal services and prosecution, public defense,
corrections, and other criminal justice services.
Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System: CJEE individual Units File and Estimates File, 1988

This survey provides criminal justice expenditure and
 employment (CJEE) data for all states, counties, and certain municipal
 governments. Specific variables include full- and part-time employees
 and payroll, expenditures for current operations, capital outlay and
 contributions to employee benefits, and intergovernmental expenditures
 paid to state and local governments. Sectors represented in this
 survey include police protection, judicial services, legal services
 and prosecution, public defense, and corrections, as well as other
criminal justice services.
Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System: CJEE Individual Units File and Estimates File, 1985

This survey provides criminal justice expenditure and
 employment (CJEE) data and for all states, counties, and certain
 municipal governments. Specific variables include full- and part-time
 employees and payroll, expenditures for current operations, capital
 outlay and contributions to employee benefits, and intergovernmental
 expenditures paid to state and local governments. Sectors represented
 in this survey include police protection, judicial services, legal
 services and prosecution, public defense, and corrections, as well as
other criminal justice services.
Expenditure and Employment Data for the Criminal Justice System:  CJEE Annual Files, 1971-1979   

This survey provides information on criminal justice
employment and expenditures for all states, counties, certain municipal
governments, and Puerto Rico. Specific variables include full- and
part-time employees and payroll, expenditures for current operations,
capital outlay and contributions to employee benefits, and
intergovernmental expenditures paid to state and local governments.
Sectors represented in this survey include police protection, judicial
services, legal services and prosecution, public defense, and corrections,
as well as other criminal justice services.