AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
National Crime Surveys: Redesign Data: Peoria Record Check Study

The purpose of this study was to measure criminal activity
in the United States based on survey reports of crime victims. In the
study two different questionnaire forms were used in order to assess
which provided better responses. One form was very lengthy and asked
detailed questions about each household, person, and incident. The
second form was much shorter and asked very generalized questions. The
data collection was an attempt to find alternative methods of sampling,
interviewing, designing questionnaires, managing data, and reporting
results. Detailed information is provided on household characteristics
and other characteristics of the respondents, as well as on crime
incidents, including burglary, vandalism, assault, and rape.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]:  Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2003  

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic
 nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported
 in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest,
 (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports
 (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Police Employee
 (LEOKA) Data provide information about law enforcement officers killed
 or assaulted (hence the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The
 variables created from the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on
 the circumstances surrounding killings or assaults, including type of
 call answered, type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers
were on.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arson, United States, 2003  

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
 nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Seven main classifications of crime were
 chosen to gauge fluctuations in the overall volume and rate of
 crime. These seven classifications that eventually became known as the
 Crime Index included the violent crimes of murder and non-negligent
 manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and the
 property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
 By congressional mandate, arson was added as the eighth Index offense
 in 1979. Arson is defined as any willful or malicious burning or
 attempt to burn, with or without intent to defraud, a dwelling house,
 public building, motor vehicle or aircraft, personal property of
 another, etc. The arson data files include monthly data on the number
 of arson offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by
 arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of arson
 received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other
sources.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]:  Property Stolen and Recovered, 2003  

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
 nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Law enforcement agencies contribute
 reports either directly or through their state reporting programs.
 Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1)
 Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and
 Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police
 Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Property Stolen and Recovered data are
 collected on a monthly basis by all UCR contributing agencies. These
 data, aggregated at the agency level, report on the nature of the
 crime, the monetary value of the property stolen, and the type of
 property stolen. Similar information regarding recovered property is
also included in the data.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 2003

These data provide information on the number of arrests
 reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime
 Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United
 States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including
 violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by
 ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting
 police agency, an agency header record, 1 to 12 monthly header
 records, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of
 arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR
restructured the original data to a rectangular format.
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Convictions and Sentences: Appeals Data, 2005

This collection contains appellate information from the 12
circuit courts of appeals of the United States. From the Clerk of the
Court of each court of appeals, the United States Sentencing
Commission compiled the final opinions and orders, both published and
unpublished, in all criminal appeals for the time period surveyed. The
Commission also collected habeas corpus decisions even though they are
technically civil matters, because such cases often involve sentencing
issues. Both the "case" and the "defendant" are used in this
collection as units of analysis. Each "case" comprises individual
records representing all codefendants participating in a consolidated
appeal. Each defendant's record comprises the sentencing-related
issues corresponding to that particular defendant.
Organizations Convicted in Federal Criminal Courts, 2005

These data, collected to assist in the development of
sentencing guidelines, describe offense and sentencing characteristics
for organizations sentenced in federal district courts in 2005. The
United States Sentencing Commission's primary function is to inform
federal courts of sentencing policies and practices that include
guidelines prescribing the appropriate form and severity of punishment
for offenders convicted of federal crimes. Court-related variables
include primary offense type, pecuniary offense loss and gain, dates
of disposition and sentencing, method of determination of guilt,
number of counts pled and charged, and dates and types of sentencing
and restitution. Defendant organization variables include ownership
structure, number of owners and employees, highest level of corporate
knowledge of the criminal offense, highest level of corporate
indictment and conviction for participation in the criminal offense,
annual revenue, equity and financial status, whether it was a criminal
organization, duration of criminal activity, and risk to national
security. Organizational defendants data, 2005, covers fiscal year
October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005.
Federal Court Cases:  Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1996

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
 official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
 courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
 in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993,
 and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still
 pending on that date. The records are organized according to the
 fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end
 included in a separate pending dataset. For the bankruptcy data, the
unit of analysis is a single case.
Federal Court Cases:  Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1995

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
 official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
 courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
 in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993,
 and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still
 pending on that date. The records are organized according to the
 fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end
 included in a separate pending dataset. For the bankruptcy data, the
unit of analysis is a single case.
Federal Court Cases:  Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 1994

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
 official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
 courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
 in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993,
 and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still
 pending on that date. The records are organized according to the
 fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end
 included in a separate pending dataset. For the bankruptcy data, the
unit of analysis is a single case.
National Incident-Based Reporting System, 2003

The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is a
 part of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR), administered by the
 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In the late 1970s, the law
 enforcement community called for a thorough evaluative study of the
 UCR with the objective of recommending an expanded and enhanced UCR
 program to meet law enforcement needs into the 21st century. The FBI
 fully concurred with the need for an updated program to meet
 contemporary needs and provided its support, formulating a
 comprehensive redesign effort. Following a multiyear study, a
 "Blueprint for the Future of the Uniform Crime Reporting Program" was
 developed. Using the "Blueprint," and in consultation with local and
 state law enforcement executives, the FBI formulated new guidelines
 for the Uniform Crime Reports. The National Incident-Based Reporting
 System (NIBRS) was implemented to meet these guidelines. NIBRS data
 are archived at ICPSR as 13 separate data files per year, which may be
 merged by using linkage variables. The data focus on a variety of
 aspects of a crime incident. Part 4, Administrative Segment, offers
 data on the incident itself (date and time). Each crime incident is
 delineated by one administrative segment record. Also provided are
 Part 5, Offense Segment (offense type, location, weapon use, and bias
 motivation), Part 6, Property Segment (type of property loss, property
 description, property value, and drug type and quantity), Part 7,
 Victim Segment (age, sex, race, ethnicity, and injuries), Part 8,
 Offender Segment (age, sex, and race), and Part 9, Arrestee Segment
 (arrest date, age, sex, race, and weapon use). The Batch Header
 Segment (Parts 1-3) separates and identifies individual police
 agencies by Originating Agency Identifier (ORI). Batch Header
 information, which is contained on three records for each ORI,
 includes agency name, geographic location, and population of the
 area. Part 10, Group B Arrest Report Segment, includes arrestee data
 for Group B crimes. Window Segments files (Parts 11-13) pertain to
 incidents for which the complete Group A Incident Report was not
 submitted to the FBI. In general, a Window Segment record will be
 generated if the incident occurred prior to January 1 of the previous
 year or if the incident occurred prior to when the agency started
 NIBRS reporting. As with the UCR, participation in NIBRS is voluntary
 on the part of law enforcement agencies. The data are not a
representative sample of crime in the United States.
Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1982: Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C.

This study provides statistical information on how
prosecutors and the courts disposed of criminal cases involving adults
arrested for felony crimes in two individual urban jurisdictions,
Portland, Oregon and Washington, D.C. Cases in the data files were
initiated or filed in 1982. Both the Washington, D.C. file and the
Portland file contain information on all felony arrests (which include
arrests declined as well as those filed), cases filed, and cases
indicted. Sentencing information is provided in the Portland file but
is not available for Washington D.C.
Monitoring of Federal Criminal Sentences, [United States], 2003

This collection contains information on federal criminal
cases sentenced under the Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements
of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. The data files include all cases
received by the United States Sentencing Commission that had
sentencing dates between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003, and
were assessed as constitutional. Constitutionality compares each
case's sentencing date, circuit, district, and judge to provide
uniformity in reporting the cases. In 1999, the United States
Sentencing Commission added more variables from its databases to this
collection, so the data are now provided in two files. Part 1, Main
Data File, includes the most important variables for each case, such
as defendant's age, criminal history points, armed criminal status,
case disposition, sentence, and fines applied. Part 2, Supplemental
Data File, contains additional variables involving multiple guideline
computation and count-based statutes. For a more detailed discussion
of the two files, users should consult the codebook.
Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2003

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
 official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
 courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
 in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993,
 and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still
 pending on that date. The records are organized according to the
 fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end
 included in a separate pending dataset. The records in Part 1,
 Terminations Data, 2003, include cases that terminated in the year
 2003. Part 2, Pending Data, 2003, contains cases still pending in the
 year 2003. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a single
case.
Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2002

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
 official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
 courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
 in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993,
 and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still
 pending on that date. The records in this file are organized according
 to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end
 of the year 2002 included in a separate pending dataset, not currently
 in this collection. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is
a single case.
Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2001

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1,1993, and
any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still pending on
that date. The records in this file are organized according to the
fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end of the
year 2001 included in a separate pending dataset, not currently in
this collection. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a
single case.
Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base Bankruptcy Petitions, 2000

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an
 official public record of the business of the federal bankruptcy
 courts. The data include all petitions filed under the Bankruptcy Code
 in the United States Bankruptcy Courts on or after October 1, 1993,
 and any petitions filed before October 1, 1993, that were still
 pending on that date. The records in this file are organized according
 to the fiscal year of termination with cases still pending at the end
 of the year 2000 included in a separate pending dataset not currently
 in this collection. For the bankruptcy data, the unit of analysis is a
single case.
State Court Statistics, 2006

This data collection provides comparable measures of state
appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are
tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the
Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court
Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of
count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload.
Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state
appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in
state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within
each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are
separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment
cases, other criminal cases, domestic relations cases, juvenile cases, traffic violations cases, and administrative agency appeals.
State Court Statistics, 2005

This data collection provides comparable measures of state
appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are
tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the
Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court
Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of
count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload.
Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state
appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in
state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. Within
each of these areas of state government investigation, cases are
separated by main case type, including civil cases, capital punishment
cases, other criminal cases, domestic relations cases, juvenile cases, traffic violations cases, and administrative agency appeals.
State Court Statistics, 2008

This data collection provides comparable measures of state
appellate and trial court caseloads by type of case for the 50 states,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Court caseloads are
tabulated according to generic reporting categories developed by the
Court Statistics Project (CSP) Committee of the Conference of State Court
Administrators. These categories describe differences in the unit of
count and the point of count when compiling each court's caseload.
Major areas of investigation include (1) case filings in state
appellate and trial courts, (2) case processing and dispositions in
state appellate and trial courts, and (3) appellate opinions. The trial caseload consists of civil, domestic relations, criminal, juvenile, and traffic violation cases.  The appellate caseload consists of appeal by right, appeal by permission, death penalty, and original proceeding/other appellate matter cases.
Federal Court Cases: Integrated Data Base, 2010

The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official
public record of the business of the federal courts. The data
originate from district and appellate court offices throughout
the United States. Information was obtained at two points in
the life of appellate and civil cases: filing and
termination. The termination data (archived in this data
collection) contain information on both filing and
terminations, while the pending data (archived as a separate
data collection) contain only filing information on the most
recent pending cases. The unit of analysis for the appellate
and civil terminations data is the case. This collection also
contains data on criminal cases in federal courts. However, the
unit of analysis for the criminal data is the defendant, and a
defendant can be included in several cases.
Annual Parole Survey, 1999

The 1999 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 1999, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal System.
Annual Parole Survey, 1998

The 1998 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 1998, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race and Hispanic or Latino origin, supervision status, and cause of death. This survey covers all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Annual Parole Survey, 1997

The 1997 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 1997, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Annual Parole Survey, 1996

The 1996 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 1996, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Annual Parole Survey, 1995

The 1995 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 1995, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Annual Parole Survey, 1994

The 1994 Annual Parole Survey provides a count of the
total number of persons supervised in the community on January 1 and
December 31, 1994, and a count of the number entering and leaving
supervision during the year. The survey also provides counts of the number of parolees by certain characteristics, such as gender, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, and supervision status. This survey covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal system.
Firearm Injury Surveillance Study, 1993-2008

These data were collected using the National Electronic
Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), the primary data system of the
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). CPSC began
operating NEISS in 1972 to monitor product-related injuries treated in
United States hospital emergency departments (EDs). In June 1992, the
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC), within the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, established an interagency
agreement with CPSC to begin collecting data on nonfatal
firearm-related injuries in order to monitor the incidents and the
characteristics of persons with nonfatal firearm-related injuries
treated in United States hospital EDs over time. This dataset
represents all nonfatal firearm-related injuries (i.e., injuries
associated with powder-charged guns) and all nonfatal BB and pellet
gun-related injuries reported through NEISS from 1993 through
2008. The cases consist of initial ED visits for treatment of the
injuries. Cases were reported even if the patients subsequently died.
Secondary visits and transfers from other hospitals were excluded.
Information is available on injury diagnosis, firearm type, use of
drugs or alcohol, criminal incident, and locale of the
incident. Demographic information includes age, sex, and race of the
injured person.