AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
National Inmate Survey (NIS) - Jails: Full Survey Respondents, [United States], 2007

The National Inmate Survey (NIS) is part of the Bureau of Justice Statistics' (BJS) National Prison Rape Statistics Program, which gathers mandated data on the incidence and prevalence of sexual assault in correctional facilities under the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA; P.L. 108- 79). Inmates are randomly assigned to receive either a survey of sexual victimization or a survey of mental and physical health, past drug and alcohol use, and treatment for substance abuse. About 88 percent of the respondents completed modules through the survey of sexual victimization while the other 12 percent completed modules through the alternative survey. However, the data in this study focuses solely upon substance use and treatment. No respondent answered questions about sexual victimization.
The same 37,0888 respondents who are in this data are also part of the 79,973 respondents from the study National Inmate Survey (NIS) - Jails: Full Survey Respondents, [United States], 2007-2009 (ICPSR 37011).
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data, 2004

This data collection contains county-level counts of
arrests and offenses for Part I offenses (murder, rape, robbery,
aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson) and
counts of arrests for Part II offenses (forgery, fraud, embezzlement,
vandalism, weapons violations, sex offenses, drug and alcohol abuse
violations, gambling, vagrancy, curfew violations, and runaways).
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Supplementary Homicide Reports, 2004 

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic
nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported
in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest,
(2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports
(SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Supplementary
Homicide Reports provide incident-based information on criminal
homicides reported to the police. These homicides consist of murders,
non-negligent manslaughter, and justifiable homicides. The data,
provided monthly by UCR agencies, contain information describing the
victim of the homicide, the offender, and the relationship between
victim and offender.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arson, 2004 

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
 nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Seven main classifications of crime were
 chosen to gauge fluctuations in the overall volume and rate of
 crime. These seven classifications that eventually became known as the
 Crime Index included the violent crimes of murder and non-negligent
 manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, and the
 property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft.
 By congressional mandate, arson was added as the eighth Index offense
 in 1979. Arson is defined as any willful or malicious burning or
 attempt to burn, with or without intent to defraud, a dwelling house,
 public building, motor vehicle or aircraft, personal property of
 another, etc. The arson data files include monthly data on the number
 of arson offenses reported and the number of offenses cleared by
 arrest or other means. The counts include all reports of arson
 received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other
sources.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Property Stolen and Recovered, 2004 

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
 nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Law enforcement agencies contribute
 reports either directly or through their state reporting programs.
 Each year, this information is reported in four types of files: (1)
 Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and
 Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police
 Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Property Stolen and Recovered data are
 collected on a monthly basis by all UCR contributing agencies. These
 data, aggregated at the agency level, report on the nature of the
 crime, the monetary value of the property stolen, and the type of
 property stolen. Similar information regarding recovered property is
also included in the data.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Police Employee (LEOKA) Data, 2004 

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as a periodic
 nationwide assessment of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Each year, this information is reported
 in four types of files: (1) Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest,
 (2) Property Stolen and Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports
 (SHR), and (4) Police Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Police Employee
 (LEOKA) Data provide information about law enforcement officers killed
 or assaulted (hence the acronym, LEOKA) in the line of duty. The
 variables created from the LEOKA forms provide in-depth information on
 the circumstances surrounding killings or assaults, including type of
 call answered, type of weapon used, and type of patrol the officers
were on.
A Sentencing Postscript: Felony Probationers Under Supervision in the Community, 1983

This study provides an overview of how the supervision of a
 class of felony probationers operates in a jurisdiction, and gives a
 baseline against which the impact of changes to probationary
 supervision can be measured. The objectives of this study were to
 describe the demographic characteristics of probationers, the nature
 and level of supervision that probationers receive, the extent and
 types of specified conditions imposed on probationers, the degree of
 probationer compliance with these specified conditions, the extent to
 which probationers are arrested and/or subjected to probationary
 disciplinary hearings while under supervision, and the exit status of
probationers from community supervision.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, Summarized Yearly, 2004

These data provide information on the number of arrests
reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime
Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United
States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including
violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by
ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing, per reporting
police agency: an agency header record, and 1 to 43 detail offense
records containing the counts of arrests by age, sex, and race for a
particular offense. ICPSR restructured the original data to logical
record length format with the agency header record variables copied
onto the detail records. Consequently, each record contains arrest
counts for a particular agency-offense.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race, 2004

These data provide information on the number of arrests
 reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime
 Reporting (UCR) Program each year by police agencies in the United
 States. These arrest reports provide data on 43 offenses including
 violent crime, drug use, gambling, and larceny. The data received by
 ICPSR were structured as a hierarchical file containing (per reporting
 police agency) an agency header record, 1 to 12 monthly header
 records, and 1 to 43 detail offense records containing the counts of
 arrests by age, sex, and race for a particular offense. ICPSR
restructured the original data to a rectangular format.
Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United States]: Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, 2004 

Since 1930, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has
 compiled the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) to serve as periodic
 nationwide assessments of reported crimes not available elsewhere in
 the criminal justice system. Law enforcement agencies contribute
 reports either directly or through their state reporting programs.
 Each year, summary data are reported in four types of files: (1)
 Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest, (2) Property Stolen and
 Recovered, (3) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), and (4) Police
 Employee (LEOKA) Data. The Offenses Known and Clearances by Arrest
 data files include monthly data on the number of Crime Index offenses
 reported and the number of offenses cleared by arrest or other means.
 The counts include all reports of Index crimes (excluding arson)
 received from victims, officers who discovered infractions, or other
sources.
Protective Behaviors of Student Victims of Bullying: A Rare Events Analysis of the 2009 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey

This study explored whether bullied students (ages 12 through 18, in grades 6 through 12, enrolled during the current school year, and not homeschooled) engage in specific protective behaviors that inhibit learning, put other students' safety at risk, or foster a negative school climate. It also explored whether bullied students' behaviors varied by the type of bullying (direct, verbal, indirect, or cyber) endured. The researchers conducted secondary analyses of the NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY: SCHOOL CRIME SUPPLEMENT, 2009 (ICPSR 28201), using rare events logistic regression, a technique that enables examination of the effects of several independent variables on a dichotomous dependent variable. The dataset produced contains a total of 65 variables, including 18 variables describing direct, verbal, indirect, and cyber bullying behaviors, 4 variables describing response behaviors by those bullied, and 28 variables describing student and school characteristics.
Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, [United States], 2004

This survey provides nationally representative data on inmates
held in state prisons and federally-owned and operated prisons.
Through personal interviews conducted from October 2003 through May
2004, inmates in both state and federal prisons provided information
about their current offense and sentence, criminal history, family
background and personal characteristics, prior drug and alcohol use
and treatment programs, gun possession and use, and prison activities,
programs, and services. Prior surveys of State prison inmates were
conducted in 1974, 1979, 1986, 1991, and 1997. Sentenced federal
prison inmates were interviewed in the 1991 and 1997 surveys.
Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 1997

Conducted by the Bureau of the Census, this survey provides
nationally representative data on state prison inmates and sentenced
federal inmates held in federally owned and operated facilities.
Through personal interviews from June-October 1997, inmates in both
state and federal prisons provided information about their current
offense and sentence, criminal history, family background and personal
characteristics, prior drug and alcohol use and treatment programs,
gun possession and use, gang membership, and prison activities,
programs, and services. Prior surveys of state prison inmates, called
SURVEY OF INMATES OF STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, were conducted in
1974, 1979, 1986, and 1991 (see ICPSR 7811, 7856, 8711, and 6086).
Sentenced federal prison inmates were first interviewed in 1991 (see
SURVEY OF INMATES OF FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, 1991 [ICPSR
6037]). The federal data are combined with the state data in this
collection. Part 1, Numeric Data, consists of numerically-coded
responses, while Part 2, Alphanumeric Data, contains free-field
responses to "Specify, Other" questions in ASCII text form.
Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals, 2001

The 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals is a
follow-up to the CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 2001 (ICPSR 3957) which examined 8,311 general civil cases (e.g.,
tort, contract, and real property) concluded by bench or jury trial in
a sample of 46 of the nation's 75 most populous counties in 2001.
These cases were then weighted to represent the 11,908 general civil
trials concluded in the nation's 75 most populous counties. Data from
the 2001 Civil Trial Survey were used to produce several Bureau of
Justice Statistics (BJS) reports describing the characteristics of
civil litigation in state courts. The 2001 Supplemental Survey of
Civil Appeals tracks every general civil case concluded by bench or
jury trial in 2001 in the 46 surveyed counties that were subsequently
appealed to an intermediate appellate court or court of last resort.
In the 2001 Civil Justice Survey of State Courts information was
collected for every general civil trial concluded in 43 of the 46
selected counties. In these counties, the 2001 Supplemental Survey of
Civil Appeals collected information on all general trials that
produced an appeal. In the three remaining counties, (Cook County,
Philadelphia County, and Bergen County), the appeals survey obtained
information for both those general civil trials concluded in 2001 that
were subsequently appealed and, in addition, collected information for
those general civil appeals that were not captured at the trial court
level. The 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals tracks data on
general civil appeals that originated from 46 of the nation's 75 most
populous counties. Unlike the 2001 Civil Justice Survey of State
Courts, cases were not weighted to represent appeals in the nation's
75 most populous counties. The appeals were followed until they were
withdrawn, dismissed, or decided on the merits in the appellate
courts. All appeals were tracked until April 30, 2005. Appeals not
disposed on that date are identified as pending. Overall four
appellate datasets were produced from this survey.
Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994

RECIDIVISM OF PRISONERS RELEASED IN 1994
is a database containing information on each of 38,624 sampled
prisoners released from prisons in 15 states in 1994 and tracked for
three years following their release. The majority of the database
consists of information on each released prisoner's entire officially
recorded criminal history (before and after the 1994 release). Sources
for criminal history information are state and FBI automated RAP
("Records of Arrests and Prosecutions") sheets, which contain records
of arrests, adjudications, and sentences. The study is the second
major recidivism study conducted by the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The first study, RECIDIVISM AMONG RELEASED PRISONERS, 1983: [UNITED
STATES] (ICPSR 8875), tracked over 16,000 prisoners released in 11
states in 1983 for three years. These two studies are the
closest approximation to "national" recidivism studies in the United
States. They are distinguished by their large sample size (over 16,000
released prisoners in the first study, 38,624 in the second),
geographic breadth of coverage (11 states in the first study, 15 in
the second), length of prospective tracking (three years from date of
release in both studies), ability to track the movement of released
prisoners across state boundaries (both studies), and multiple
measures of recidivism (both studies). Demographic data include race,
ethnicity, sex, and date of birth.
Recidivism Among Released Prisoners, 1983:  [United States]  

This data collection provides comprehensive criminal history
data on prisoners released from custody in 1983. Precise estimates are
supplied on recidivism among prisoners of all ages with all types of
postrelease supervision. Data cover recidivism both within and outside
the states in which the prisoners were released. Variables include
sociodemographic indices, type of sentence, length of sentence, offense,
court action, and date of court action.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1989: Alabama, Alaska, California, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1988: Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1987: Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1986: Alabama, Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1985: Alaska, California, Delaware, Georgia, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1983:  California, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Virgin Islands, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.
Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS), 1982: California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Minnesota, New York, Virgin Islands, and Virginia

Offender Based Transaction Statistics (OBTS) studies are
 designed to collect information by tracking adult offenders from the
 point of entry into the criminal justice system (typically by arrest)
 through final disposition, regardless of whether the offender is
 convicted or acquitted. Information is provided on arrest, police
 action, prosecutor action, level of charges, charges filed by the
 prosecutor, type of counsel, pretrial status, type of trial, sentence
 type, and sentence length. This allows researchers to examine how the
 criminal justice system processes offenders, to measure the changing
 volume of offenders moving through the different segments of the
 criminal justice system, to calculate processing time intervals
 between major decision-making events, and to assess the changing
structure of the offender population.