FOI-02811

#Request 
 
‘-The NHS Business Services Authority's knowledge of and involvement with public health injection programs deployed since 2020, The biochemical composition and technological function of these products, and

-Any related infrastructure, public messaging strategies, and ethical considerations. 

(Plain English: I want to know what you knew, what was in it, who was involved, how it was promoted, and if you understand the implications.) 
 
Technological Signal Emissions from Human Subjects Please confirm: 

-Whether The NHS Business Services Authority is aware of the phenomenon where individuals post-injection emit Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) MAC addresses; Whether any monitoring tools (including smart city sensors, 5G repeaters, Wi-Fi mesh systems) in the jurisdiction are capable of detecting such emissions; 
 
-If any departments or contractors have recorded, stored, or reported on BLE signal emissions originating from biologically modified individuals. 

(Plain English: Are jabbed people emitting Bluetooth signals? Are you, or your tech partners, detecting or tracking it?) 
 
Awareness of Biologically Active Ingredients Capable of Internal Surveillance or Genetic Alteration Please provide evidence that NHS:
 
-Was aware of or advised about the inclusion of ingredients such as: 

• PEGylated lipids (e.g. PEG2000-DMG) 
• Ionizable cationic lipids (e.g. DLin-MC3-DMA, DOTMA, DODAP)
• Modified uridines (e.g. Ψ, m1Ψ, s2U)
• Luciferase, GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein), microspheres
• Spike protein epitope encodings and synthetic RNA codon sequences 
 
-Understood the potential of these substances to: 

• Bypass blood-brain barriers 
• Interact with electromagnetic fields 
• Self-assemble into delivery mechanisms
• Alter gene expression, cellular signaling, or epigenetic function 
 
(Plain English: Did you know these chemical agents can behave like antennas, change DNA, or track people inside their bodies?) 
 
Ethical and Legal Evaluation of Public Messaging, Coercion & Consent Please disclose: 

-Any discussions or guidelines relating to behavioral psychology, coercion, or incentive-based messaging to increase injection uptake; 
 
-Contracts with media outlets or central government agencies coordinating narrative framing; 
 
-Materials used in schools, workplaces, or medical settings that framed experimental gene therapy as "safe and effective" without disclosing investigational status. 

(Plain English: Were people psychologically manipulated into taking something experimental without proper informed consent?) 
 
Jurisdictional Awareness of Human Rights Law, Ethical Boundaries, and Criminal Liability Please confirm: 

-Whether The NHS Business Services Authority  was aware of obligations under the Nuremberg Code, UN Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, and Articles of the Rome Statute; 

-Whether legal reviews were conducted concerning long-term biological experimentation, coercion, or non-consensual risk exposure; 
 
-Any  legal team or otherwise discussion about civil or criminal liability related to the endorsement or enforcement of mRNA interventions. 

(Plain English: Were you aware you could be breaking international law or violating human rights?) 
 
Reminder: Coercive medical treatment is forbidden under Article 6 of the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. 
 
Silence as Consent — Lawful Doctrine Enforcement Under the longstanding principle of "Qui tacet consentire videtur" (He who is silent is taken to agree), failure to respond fully or transparently will be interpreted as: 
 
Acknowledgment of Bluetooth signal emissions from injected subjects; Implicit consent to public distribution of this acknowledgment as lawful truth; Admission of non-compliance with informed consent law; Confirmation that ethical and biological risks were known and dismissed. 

(Plain English: If you don’t answer, the law assumes you agree with everything above — and that will be made public.) 
 
Evidence Archive: Official Patent Documentation This request is supported by and linked to the World Intellectual Property Organization patent: 
 
WO2021155323A1 — Systems and Methods for Coronavirus Vaccines (This ones the Pizer one, i can bring all the other ones up also along side all the other psychological operations which occur under your fictious authority) 
 
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2021155323 
 
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2021213945A1 
 
The patent confirms use of the following technologies in the injections: 
 
Self-assembling lipid nanoparticles

Modified uridines for RNA stability and stealth Luciferase/GFP for bioluminescent tracking Ionizable cationic lipids for intracellular delivery Spike protein codon-optimized synthetic sequences Immuno-targeted epitope libraries

Electromagnetically interactive molecular structures (Plain English: It’s all in the patent — this is not theory. These substances are real, trackable, and legally documented.)’

#Our response

I am writing to advise you that following a search of our paper and electronic records, we have established that the information you requested is not held by the NHSBSA. The NHSBSA was not involved in the creation of any vaccine, so we have no information on their composition or function.


#Advice and assistance 


If, however, you are looking for information on our response to COVID-19, this can be found at the below web link:


https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/our-response-coronavirus-covid-19

Tags: COVID-19
Organization: Freedom of Information Disclosure Log