AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Registration Decision RD2021-04, Indole-3-butyric acid, Calcium Disodium EDTA hydrate, VNT RTU MFG, and VNT Selective Herbicide Ready-to-Use

This decision is consistent with the Proposed Registration Decision PRD2021-01, Indole-3-Butyric Acid, Calcium Disodium EDTA Hydrate, VNT RTU MFG and VNT Selective Herbicide Ready-to-Use, which contains a detailed evaluation of the information submitted in support of this registration.

Organization: Health Canada | Santé Canada
Languages used at work by employment income statistics, immigrant status and highest certificate, diploma or degree: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts

Data on language used most often at work by employment income statistics, knowledge of official languages, other language(s) used regularly at work, highest certificate, diploma or degree, immigrant status and labour force status for the population&nbsp;aged 15 years and over who worked since 2020, in private households of Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts.

Organization: Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada
Registration Decision RD2019-16, Hop Beta Acids (Present as Potassium Salts), HopGuard Liquid, HopGuard II

This decision is consistent with the Proposed Registration Decision PRD2019-08, Hop Beta Acids (Present as Potassium Salts), HopGuard Liquid, HopGuard II, which contains a detailed evaluation of the information submitted in support of this registration. 

Organization: Health Canada | Santé Canada
Languages used at work by industry groups and knowledge of official languages: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts

Data on language used most often at work by other language(s) used regularly at work, industry groups - North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 2017, knowledge of official languages and labour force status for the population aged 15 years and over who worked since 2020, in private households of Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations with parts.

Organization: Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada
Languages used at work by occupation and knowledge of official languages: Canada, provinces and territories and census metropolitan areas with parts

Data on language used most often at work by other language(s) used regularly at work, occupation - unit group - National Occupational Classification (NOC) 2021, knowledge of official languages and labour force status for the population aged 15 years and over who worked since 2020, in private households of Canada, provinces and territories and census metropolitan areas with parts.

Organization: Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada
Registration Decision RD2019-01, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. galleriae Strain SDS-502, grubGONE! G, grubHALT!, beetleGONE!, beetleJUS!

This decision is consistent with the Proposed Registration Decision PRD2018-19, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. galleriae Strain SDS-502, grubGONE! G, grubHALT!, beetleGONE!, beetleJUS!, which contains a detailed evaluation of the information submitted in support of this registration.

Organization: Health Canada | Santé Canada
Registration Decision RD2019-14, Chlorine Generating Devices, Chlorinsitu II 24, Chlorinsitu II 200 and Chlorinsitu II 400

This decision is consistent with the Proposed Registration Decision PRD2019-06, Chlorine Generating Devices, Chlorinsitu II 24, Chlorinsitu II 200 and Chlorinsitu II 400, which contains a detailed evaluation of the information submitted in support of this registration. 

Organization: Health Canada | Santé Canada
The Honourable Bernard Synnott’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Bernard Synnott.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Anne Louise Kirker’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Anne Louise Kirker.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Gillian E. Roberts’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Gillian E. Roberts.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Barry M. Tobin’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Barry M. Tobin.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Sylvain Lussier’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7 and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Sylvain Lussier.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable W. Paul Riley’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial appointment process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for such appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire could be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable W. Paul Riley.


Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Warren B. Milman’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial appointment process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for such appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire could be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Warren B. Milman.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Michael J. Brundrett’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial appointment process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for such appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire could be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Michael J. Brundrett.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Sally A. Gomery’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial appointment process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for such appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire could be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Sally A. Gomery.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Barbara J. Norell’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial appointment process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for such appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire could be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Barbara J. Norell.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Christian Lyons’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Christian Lyons.


Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Susan Wong’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Susan Wong.


Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable April D. Grosse’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable April D. Grosse.


Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Forward Regulatory Plan

A forward regulatory plan is a public list or description of anticipated regulatory changes or actions that a department intends to bring forward or undertake in a specified time frame. It is intended to give consumers, business, other stakeholders and trading partners greater opportunity to inform the development of regulations and to plan for the future. It should be noted that this forward regulatory plan will be adjusted and updated over time as Justice Canada's operating environment also changes over time.

This plan provides information on planned and potential regulatory initiatives that Justice Canada expects to bring forward over the next two years. It also identifies public consultation opportunities and a departmental contact point for each regulatory initiative.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Disclosure of Contracts for Legal Services

On March 23, 2004, the Government announced a new policy on the mandatory publication of contracts over $10,000. At the time, certain types of contracts were excluded from the proactive disclosure requirements, chief among these being contracts for legal services. TBS has revised the Treasury Board Guidelines on the Proactive Disclosure of Contracts to remove the exemption for contracts for legal services. Under the current guidelines, the only contracts exempted from proactive disclosure obligations are those where disclosure of information would compromise criminal investigations, national security, negotiations or public safety.

This Website provides information on legal agents appointed by the Minister of Justice and the related contracts for legal services issued by the Department of Justice. The general policy of the Department is that legal services within the department's statutory mandate should be handled by departmental counsel. The Department recognizes, however, that there are instances when such services may or should be outsourced to legal agents. The Department of Justice's Policy on Contracting for Legal Services and Legal Agent Appointments sets out the principles which guide the appointment of legal agents.

Every three months we will be reporting new legal agent appointments made by the Minister of Justice in the quarter being reported. By June 30th, following the last quarterly report for each fiscal year, a report will include the total annual expenditures by firm, based on amounts taxed by the Department, where the aggregate value of amounts taxed exceeds $10,000.00 in the fiscal year being reported. This approach balances the need for transparency and disclosure of contract information with the recognition that aspects of contracts for legal services are protected by solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege. The overall disclosure is presented fairly, in all material respects and in accordance with TBS Guidelines on the Proactive Disclosure of Contracts.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Disclosure of Briefing Materials for the Minister, the Deputy Minister and the Associate Deputy Minister: 2019

The briefing material titles listed below were prepared for the Minister, the Deputy Minister and the Associate Deputy Minister of Justice. The lists are generated at the end of each month and are a snapshot in time of records created for that month. In keeping with the spirit of the Access to Information Act, the briefing material titles that would be exempted pursuant to the Act are redacted. Briefing material titles relating to Cabinet Confidences do not appear on the list. If you find a title of interest, you may make an Access to Information Request in order to obtain the records.

Beginning in May 2019, the titles of briefing materials prepared for the Minister, Deputy Minister, and Associate Deputy Minister of Justice are now published by the Department exclusively through the Open Government Portal under Proactive Disclosure - Briefing Note Titles and Numbers.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Research at a Glance: National Justice Survey 2017 - Sentencing Commissions and Guidelines

Most Canadians feel that sentencing guidelines are the best way to ensure a fair sentence and they believe that sentencing would be more consistent with such guidelines. Many Canadians also believe that Canada should consider having a sentencing commission, and that most important activity of this body would be to give judges guidelines for sentencing decisions. 

What we also found: 

Seven in ten (71%) Canadians indicated that the best approach to sentencing is to provide guidelines while sill allowing for a judge's discretion. 

More than eight in ten (83%) thought that guidelines for sentencing would help making sentencing more consistent (only 4% did not believe that this would be the case) and that Canada should consider having set guidelines (81%). 

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
2017 to 2018 Fees Report

This 2017 to 2018 Fees Report is the first report to be prepared under the Service Fees Act. The report includes new information such as a detailed listing of all fees along with future year fee amounts. Additional fee information will be included starting next fiscal year, once the Department of Justice Canada fully transitions to the Service Fees Act regime.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
2018 to 2019 Fees Report

This report, which is tabled under section 20 of the Service Fees Act and section 4.2.8 of the Directive on Charging and Special Financial Authorities, contains information about the fees that the Department of Justice had the authority to charge in the 2018 to 2019 fiscal year.

This report contains information about all fees that are under the Department of Justice’s authority, even if some or all of the fees are collected by another department.

The information reported includes fees that:

fall under the Service Fees Act
are exempt from the Service Fees Act
The information covers fees set by:

contract
market-base, auction or both
act, regulation or fees notice
For fees set by the following mechanisms, the report provides totals only:

contract
market-base, auction or both
For fees set by act, regulation or fees notice, the report provides totals for fee groupings, as well as detailed information for each individual fee.

Although the fees charged by the Department of Justice under the Access to Information Act are subject to the Service Fees Act, they are not included in this report. Information on the Department of Justice’s access to information fees for fiscal year 2018 to 2019 is posted on the Department of Justice Access to Information and Privacy Research and Reports web page.

Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
The Honourable Nancy Dilts’s Questionnaire

Under the new judicial application process introduced by the Minister of Justice on October 20, 2016, any interested and qualified Canadian lawyer or judge may apply for federal judicial appointment by completing a questionnaire. The questionnaires are then used by the Judicial Advisory Committees across Canada to review candidates and submit a list of “highly recommended” and “recommended” candidates for consideration by the Minister of Justice. Candidates are advised that parts of their questionnaire may be made available to the public, with their consent, should they be appointed to the bench. The information is published as it was submitted by the candidates at the time they applied, subject to editing where necessary for privacy reasons.

Below are Parts 5, 6, 7, and 11 of the questionnaire completed by the Honourable Nancy Dilts.


Organization: Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada