AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
CLM - Walloon Coal Measures Isopach thickness scanned image

## **Abstract** 

This dataset was supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and is presented here as originally supplied. The metadata was not provided by the data supplier and has been compiled by the programme based on known details.



This image was scanned from the Ingram and Robinson (1996) report. It shows the thickness of the Walloon Coal Measures within the Clarence-Moreton Basin in NSW.



This dataset has been provided to the BA Programme for use within the programme only. Third parties should contact the NSW Department of Industry. http://www.industry.nsw.gov.au/

## **Dataset History** 

The image is scanned from: Ingram FT and Robinson VA (Facer RA (ed)) (1996) Petroleum prospectivity of the Clarence-Moreton Basin in New South Wales. New South Wales Department of Mineral Resources, Petroleum Bulletin 3.

## **Dataset Citation** 

NSW Trade and Investment (2014) CLM - Walloon Coal Measures Isopach thickness scanned image. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 28 September 2017, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/02c18a51-61e7-4a20-9edf-bd0138e5002a.

Tags: Clarence-Moreton bioregion, geoscientificInformation
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
2016 SoE Marine Trends in the biomass of large fishes and invertebrates around Australia

Abundance of fish and invertebrates at 7 reef biodiversity monitoring stations around Australia from 2005 to 2015. Source Reef Life Survey - http://reeflifesurvey.com/ 

Data made available under CC BY NC ND terms.

Data used to produce graph MAR27a and b in the Marine Theme of the 2016 State of the Environment Report, available at 
https://soe.environment.gov.au/theme/marine-environment/topic/2016/state-and-trends-marine-biodiversity-species-groups#marine-environment-figure-27

Tags: 2016, 2016 SoE, Biomass, Fish, Invertebrate, Marine environment, Reef, SoE, SoE Graph, State of the Environment
Organization: State of the Environment
2016 SoE Marine Volume of dredged material disposed at sea, 2006, 2011, 2016

Million cubic meteres of dredged material disposed at sea, 2006, 2011, 2016. Prepared by CSIRO for State of the Environment Report 2016, Marine Chapter. 

Data used to produce Figure MAR22, SoE 2016; See;
https://soe.environment.gov.au/theme/marine-environment/topic/2016/dumped-wastes#marine-environment-figure-22

Tags: 2016, 2016 SoE, Dredging, Marine environment, SoE, SoE Graph, State of the Environment
Organization: State of the Environment
2016 SoE Biodiversity Most important knowledge gaps hindering effective management of biodiversity

Key knowledge gaps hindering effective management of biodiversity (in Australia) according to a survey of Ecological Society of Australia members.

In December 2015, Ecological Society of Australia (ESA) members were surveyed to solicit opinions on the current and emerging pressures on biodiversity, and impediments to effective management. 155 members responded.

This data was used by the Department of Environment and Energy to produce Figure BIO3 in the Biodiversity theme of Australia State of the Environment 2016, available at 
https://soe.environment.gov.au/theme/biodiversity/topic/2016/availability-information#biodiversity-figure-3

According to the data, the highest-ranked response (18 per cent) was a lack of basic knowledge about species distributions and abundances, and particularly of threatened species (46 per cent of respondents included this category in the top 5). Other responses identified a lack of understanding of ecological processes, threatening processes and potential ecological thresholds or tipping points. The survey identified a lack of effective control of invasive species and a lack of knowledge about the impacts of climate change as the most important targets that need to be addressed to manage biodiversity cost-effectively. The survey further identified that management was hampered by a lack of understanding about the effectiveness of management and about best-practice management.

For further background see: the full Biodiversity report at http://www.soe.environment.gov.au (in particular, the section titled "Pressures")





Tags: 2016, 2016 SoE, Biodiversity, ESA, Ecological Society of Australia, Gaps, Knowledge, SoE, SoE Graph, State of the Environment, knowledge gaps, management, survey
Organization: State of the Environment
Petroleum Wells North and South SYD v01

## **Abstract** 

The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement. 



Spreadsheets of both the wells for the southern and northern bioregions with relevant well information attributed.

## **Purpose** 

Used to create shapefiles of the existing petroleum wells in the southern and northern Sydney bioregions

## **Dataset History** 

The data has been exported from MinView software courtesy of the NSW Department of Industry - Resources and Energy (Dated 13/08/2014)

## **Dataset Citation** 

Bioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) Petroleum Wells North and South SYD v01. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 22 June 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/4ede4b9b-f4f0-41d7-b0ca-dea1c14508ad.

## **Dataset Ancestors** 

* **Derived From** [NSW Petroleum Boreholes 20140815](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/7629e8db-b01e-4d6e-b926-a4df07e7eebc)



Tags: Hunter subregion, New South Wales, economy, geoscientificInformation
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
Cooper Basin Drawdown Calculations - De Glee method

## **Abstract** 

This dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme. The parent datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The process undertaken to product this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.



This dataset was created in order to calculate the steady-state drawdown extent for potential CSG developments in the Cooper subregion. The calculations are made using the de Glee method, as described in Krusemann (1994)  in accordance with the SA Far North Water Allocation Plan (2009) explanation document. The data was created as part of the conceptual modelling for causal pathways to assess the potential for CSG development-related impacts to propagate via groundwater drawdown.

## **Dataset History** 

The dataset assumes water production rates for CSG in the Cooper subregion based on production rates in other eastern Australian Permian CSG fields, reported in 

Onshore co-produced water: extent and management (http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/6b3d8096-f09d-40a2-b5ee-09c9f8b9bdfc); and

Fell, (2013) Discussion paper for Office of NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer: Water treatment and coal seam gas. (http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/714e35df-76bb-4a5d-b5d8-0fcc65329dfe); 

Distance-drawdown was calculated using the de Glee method for steady-state drawdown described in Krusemann (1994) Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data. (http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/c66b744e-e9bb-4d88-a82c-a6593efe91d2)

## **Dataset Citation** 

Bioregional Assessment Programme (2015) Cooper Basin Drawdown Calculations - De Glee method. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 27 November 2017, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/51323ab4-3613-47eb-acf3-3d89e8b9c062.

## **Dataset Ancestors** 

* **Derived From** [Discussion paper for Office of NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer: Water treatment and coal seam gas.](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/714e35df-76bb-4a5d-b5d8-0fcc65329dfe)

* **Derived From** [Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data.](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/c66b744e-e9bb-4d88-a82c-a6593efe91d2)

* **Derived From** [Onshore co-produced water: extent and management](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/6b3d8096-f09d-40a2-b5ee-09c9f8b9bdfc)



Tags: Cooper subregion, geoscientificInformation
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
Non Rated Species Reptiles - PED

## **Abstract** 

This dataset and its metadata statement were supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and are presented here as originally supplied.

Shows the locations of non-rated species that have not been rated but have been recorded and maybe significant to it's relevant biotic group.



Current biodiversity data are available from the Atlas of Living Australia at http://www.ala.org.au/

## **Purpose** 

To indicate the distribution and effort for survey sites across the subregion.

## **Dataset History** 

Dataset developed for the Lake Eyre Basin Bioregional Assessment: Context statement for the Pedirka subregion. The locational information for biological survey sites is collected in a number of formats, with older surveys in the pastoral region being read from maps at various scales (may be up to 1:250,000) and newer surveys using GPS.

## **Dataset Citation** 

SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (2015) Non Rated Species Reptiles - PED. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 12 October 2016, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/51bfcdff-dd3e-437e-bfb3-bb0771eee03b.

Tags: Pedirka subregion, biota
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
SSB Historical Mining Footprints DTIRIS 20150818

## **Abstract** 

This dataset was supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and is presented here as originally supplied. 

The metadata was not provided by the data supplier and has been compiled by the programme based on known details at the time of acquisition.



The following data was requested for the SSB region from the NSW Department of Trade and Investment to provide/give access to the following information. 

Spatial information (maps, GIS layers, images) showing:

\*	The xyz dimensions of the footprints of underground (i.e. both longwall and bord-and-pillar) mines excavated from 1980 to 2012, updated once every 4-years, in the SSB bioregion. 

\*	The xyz dimensions of the footprints of open cut mines excavated from 1980 to 2012, updated once every 4-years, in the SSB bioregion, including details of rehabilitated areas, if available

\*	The z dimension (elevation) relative to sea level, i.e. the AHD reference.

Other information as follows

\*	The company that undertook each excavation

\*	For underground workings, whether longwall or board and pillar mining was used, and if the latter, whether the pillars have been subsequently extracted.

\*	Mine water discharge volumes between 1980 and 2012, or until mine water pumping ceased, as available.

## **Purpose** 

NSW Department of Trade and Investment collects this information for monitoring purposes.

## **Dataset History** 

NSW Department of Trade and Investment collects this information for monitoring purposes.

This dataset was supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and is presented here as originally supplied. 

The metadata was not provided by the data supplier and has been compiled by the programme based on known details at the time of acquisition.

## **Dataset Citation** 

NSW Trade and Investment (2015) SSB Historical Mining Footprints DTIRIS 20150818. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 18 June 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/52bb3c0a-edcb-47e0-99fb-bbe666818889.

Tags: Sydney Basin bioregion, economy
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
New South Wales CSG wells stratigraphy

## **Abstract** 

The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement. 



This dataset contains two different csv files:



1) location details of coal seam gas wells in NSW

2) associated stratigraphic information (contacts between different geological formations)

## **Purpose** 

This dataset formed a major basis for the development of three-dimensional geological models.

## **Dataset History** 

The data are sourced from well completion reports downloaded from the NSW Department of Trade and Investment DIGS system; it also contains information from re-interpreted geological contacts provided by Metgasco Limited.

## **Dataset Citation** 

Bioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) New South Wales CSG wells stratigraphy. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 28 September 2017, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/52bf4223-7ae7-4499-a8e8-c75e2d586f26.

## **Dataset Ancestors** 

* **Derived From** [QLD Coal Seam Gas well locations - 14/08/2014](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/88028a0b-7c1e-4b70-8217-abc2c536e6c4)

* **Derived From** [Formation tops exploration wells](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/414c8231-9471-4620-b2ea-f57e2114d1bb)

* **Derived From** [CLM - Coal seam gas and petroleum wells](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/598c923e-7eba-47ab-a1de-637dbe0d08fd)

* **Derived From** [CLM CSG-Petroleum Wells v02](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/2df7b68b-b4ee-44c7-b35b-0c6d934b8102)

* **Derived From** [CLM - Queensland well completion reports](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/e66a0708-2d10-4f21-bbe1-c986f5e0d4e7)

* **Derived From** [CLM - New South Wales well completion reports](https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/85d50f57-37bb-4af5-ab67-4e8849d0cd98)



Tags: Clarence-Moreton bioregion, New South Wales, geoscientificInformation
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
Majors streams and rivers in the Gippsland Basin cut to the extent of the Gippsland Basin Bioregional Assessment extent.  Source of the data is not known, either the Victorian statewide dataset or a national hydrology dataset.

## **Abstract** 

This dataset was supplied to the Bioregional Assessment Programme by a third party and is presented here as originally supplied. Metadata was not provided and has been compiled by the Bioregional Assessment Programme based on known details at the time of acquisition.



To represent the locations of major streams and rivers (hydrology features) in Gippsland

## **Purpose** 

To represent the locations of streams and rivers in Gippsland

## **Dataset History** 

Clipped from a river basin database which could be Vicmap hydro - Basin100, or it may have been sourced from the Geofabric database. Unfortunately this hasn't been captured.

## **Dataset Citation** 

Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (2015) Majors streams and rivers in the Gippsland Basin cut to the extent of the Gippsland Basin Bioregional Assessment extent.  Source of the data is not known, either the Victorian statewide dataset or a national hydrology dataset.. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 05 October 2018, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/00160570-97e4-4394-8073-00b2c891ecf5.

Tags: Gippsland Basin bioregion, Victoria, inlandWaters
Organization: Bioregional Assessment Program
ASGS Geographic Correspondences (2011)

Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) geographic correspondences from 2011 in .xls and .xlsx formats. Please be advised that these correspondences are in the format (read from left to right): From Region Code, From Region Name, To Region Code, To Region Name, Ratio, Percent.

Tags: 2011, ABS, Area, Area Correspondence, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Boundaries, Correspondence, Demography not elsewhere classified, Geographic Correspondence, Human Geography not elsewhere classified, Location, Population, Population Correspondence, Public Administration, Statistics not elsewhere classified
Organization: ABS Geospatial Solutions
Vegetation data for the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020

### Overview
The reporting of this data is required to meet statutory obligations under the Basin Plan. Reporting against vegetation targets is specified in the Basin Plan as well as the Basin-Wide Environmental Watering Strategy, this data includes both ruppia and stand-condition reporting.


###Basin Plan Evaluation 2020 products
A range of products have been developed and released as part of the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020.

[Link to content landing zone](https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-management/basin-plan/basin-plan-evaluations/2020-basin-plan-evaluation)

[Link to reports and data page](https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/2020-basin-plan-evaluation-reports-and-data)

[Link to Stand Condition dashboard](https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOWVlZDJiYmUtNDhmMy00MmMwLTkzNDQtM2YwZWUzMDMzZWYzIiwidCI6IjFlMjU3ZjA5LWQ5NmItNDkxYS1hNDg4LWRjMmEzOTljYmVlNSJ9)

[Link to Ruppia dashboard](https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiZWFlNjE0YTQtZTk5NC00OWViLTlkZWYtOTJiNDExMTdmMjZlIiwidCI6IjFlMjU3ZjA5LWQ5NmItNDkxYS1hNDg4LWRjMmEzOTljYmVlNSJ9)


Tags: BPE2020, Basin Plan evaluation, Environment
Organization: Murray-Darling Basin Authority
Modelled hydrologic data for the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020

# Overview
The hydrologic condition analysis for the 2020 Basin Plan Evaluation drew on data of estimated flows derived from hydrologic modelling done during the development of the Basin Plan 2012. The specific data used for the Evaluation was derived from Basin Plan Model Run 845 which was an earlier version of the final model run (Basin Plan Model Run 871) which was used to establish the Baseline (BDLs) and Sustainable Diversion Limits (SDLs) for the Basin Plan.

For the End-of-System Connectivity Theme, the MDBA also drew on data of estimated barrage flows in the Coorong. This data was produced through modelling of barrage flows by the MDBA. Further information on the underlying methodology can be found as part of the MDBA's publications on the [salt export objective and salinity targets for flow management.](https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/salt-export-objective-and-salinity-targets-flow-management)


# Additional Resources

[Link to content landing zone](https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-management/basin-plan/basin-plan-evaluations/2020-basin-plan-evaluation)

[Link to reports and data page](https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/2020-basin-plan-evaluation-reports-and-data)

[Link to Hydrology dashboard](https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOGM2NWUyNmMtZTY0YS00MWZjLWI1YjgtMjk4MmY0OTRjMDBhIiwidCI6IjFlMjU3ZjA5LWQ5NmItNDkxYS1hNDg4LWRjMmEzOTljYmVlNSJ9)

[Link to notebook code on GitHub](https://github.com/MDBAuth/FlowAnalysis2020BPE)

Tags: BPE2020, Basin Plan evaluation, Hydrology
Organization: Murray-Darling Basin Authority
Observed hydrologic data for the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020

### Overview
The hydrologic analysis that underpinned the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020 drew predominately on watercourse discharge observations made at gauging stations across the Basin. Additionally, for the end-of-system analysis done for the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth, observations of water levels in the Lower Lakes and measures of the diurnal tidal ratio in the Coorong were also utilised. 

The sourcing of this data was done predominately through the online water data services provided by each Basin State and the relevant attributions are made below.

### Attributions
Each of the resources under this dataset contain hydrologic data taken from gauging stations across the Basin and sourced from online water data services provided by the relevant state government entity.

For QLD sites, the data was sourced from the Queensland Government's [Water Monitoring Information Portal](https://water-monitoring.information.qld.gov.au/) and used under a [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) licence.

For NSW sites, the data was sourced from the &copy; State of New South Wales through WaterNSW via the [Real-time Data portal](https://realtimedata.waternsw.com.au/). Details of the reuse permissions can be found on the [WaterNSW website](https://www.waternsw.com.au/copyright).

For Victorian sites, the data was sourced from the Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning's [Water Measurement Information System](https://data.water.vic.gov.au/) and used under a [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) licence.

For South Australian sites, the data was sourced from the Government of South Australia's [WaterConnect portal](https://www.waterconnect.sa.gov.au/Pages/Home.aspx) and used under a [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) licence.

# Additional Resources

[Link to content landing zone](https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-management/basin-plan/basin-plan-evaluations/2020-basin-plan-evaluation)

[Link to reports and data page](https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/2020-basin-plan-evaluation-reports-and-data)

[Link to Hydrology dashboard](https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOGM2NWUyNmMtZTY0YS00MWZjLWI1YjgtMjk4MmY0OTRjMDBhIiwidCI6IjFlMjU3ZjA5LWQ5NmItNDkxYS1hNDg4LWRjMmEzOTljYmVlNSJ9)

[Link to notebook code on GitHub](https://github.com/MDBAuth/FlowAnalysis2020BPE)

Tags: BPE2020, Basin Plan evaluation, Hydrology
Organization: Murray-Darling Basin Authority
Hydrologic indicator results for the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020

# Overview

The MDBA analysed hydrologic condition in the Basin across a range of metrics or 'flow components'.

The immediate results of this analysis and well as the results from additional statistical testing are available here.

# Additional Resources

[Link to content landing zone](https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-management/basin-plan/basin-plan-evaluations/2020-basin-plan-evaluation)

[Link to reports and data page](https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/2020-basin-plan-evaluation-reports-and-data)

[Link to Hydrology dashboard](https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOGM2NWUyNmMtZTY0YS00MWZjLWI1YjgtMjk4MmY0OTRjMDBhIiwidCI6IjFlMjU3ZjA5LWQ5NmItNDkxYS1hNDg4LWRjMmEzOTljYmVlNSJ9)

[Link to notebook code on GitHub](https://github.com/MDBAuth/FlowAnalysis2020BPE)

Tags: BPE2020, Basin Plan evaluation, Hydrology
Organization: Murray-Darling Basin Authority
Catchment inflow data for the Basin Plan Evaluation 2020

# Overview
Estimates of inflows into catchments was a core component of the hydrologic condition analysis done for the 2020 Basin Plan Evaluation. These catchment inflows were determined based on daily runoff outputs produced by the Bureau of Meteorology's (BOM) [Australian Landscape Water Balance model (AWRA-L v6)](https://awo.bom.gov.au/assets/notes/publications/AWRALv6_Model_Description_Report.pdf). Usage of this dataset is licenced under the [Creative Commons Attribution Australia Licence](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/).

Additionally the MDBA used these catchment inflows to categorise catchments across water years from a wetness perspective (i.e. 'climate categorisation').


# Additional Resources

[Link to content landing zone](https://www.mdba.gov.au/water-management/basin-plan/basin-plan-evaluations/2020-basin-plan-evaluation)

[Link to reports and data page](https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/publications/2020-basin-plan-evaluation-reports-and-data)

[Link to Hydrology dashboard](https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiOGM2NWUyNmMtZTY0YS00MWZjLWI1YjgtMjk4MmY0OTRjMDBhIiwidCI6IjFlMjU3ZjA5LWQ5NmItNDkxYS1hNDg4LWRjMmEzOTljYmVlNSJ9)

[Link to notebook code on GitHub](https://github.com/MDBAuth/FlowAnalysis2020BPE)

Tags: BPE2020, Basin Plan evaluation, Hydrology
Organization: Murray-Darling Basin Authority