AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Mean transpiration in November from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a12.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in November from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a25.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Multibeam_50m_Bathymetry_2012_RGB_WMS

This map service contains the extents of the multibeam bathymetry data held by GA, as at August 2012, which lies within the boundaries of Australia's Extended Continental Shelf, as well as some data in international waters.

You can also purchase hard copies of Geoscience Australia data and other products at http://www.ga.gov.au/products-services/how-to-order-products/sales-centre.html

Tags: Earth Sciences, Web Service, marine_coastal
Organization: Geoscience Australia
Mean transpiration in May from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a06.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in May from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a19.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in March from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a05.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in March from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a04.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mudgeeraba village character

This layer is displayed on the Mudgeeraba village character overlay map in City Plan version 7 as 'Mudgeeraba village character'. The layer is also available in Council’s City Plan interactive mapping tool. For further information on City Plan, please visit http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/planning-and-building/city-plan-2015-19859.html

Tags: City Plan, City of Gold Coast, CoGC, Mudgeeraba, character, planning, village
Organization: City of Gold Coast
Mean transpiration in March from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a17.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in June from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a07.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in June from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a20.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in July from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a08.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in July from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a21.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in January from the plant canopy for the present day scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a02.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in January from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a15.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Mean transpiration in February from the plant canopy for the pre 1788 scenario

    

Mean annual (00) and monthly (01a|12) transpiration (mm) from the plant canopy
for the period 1980-1999.Interpretation:Canopy transpiration is far more
spatially variable than potential evaporation, reflecting the effects of water
limitation in most areas of the continent. Both the annual mean and seasonal
pattern broadly resemble the corresponding patterns for rainfall. Canopy
transpiration maps have more acontrasta (relative variation) than the total
evaporation or rainfall maps because transpiration is a small component of
total evaporation in areas of low plant cover (the remainder being soil
evaporation).The partitioning between soil evaporation and canopy
transpiration in the model is determined by leaf area index.Notes: These are
model-based estimates from the BiosEquil model. Results are given for the
aBASEa (pre-1788) and aAGRICa (present day) conditions. The aAGRICa case
includes current agricultural inputs of water from
irrigation.EvapCanopy.00.Agric, EvapCanopy.01.Agric a| EvapCanopy.12.Agric a
Mean annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aAGRICa (present day)
scenarioEvapCanopy.00.Base, EvapCanopy.01.Base a| EvapCanopy.12.Base a Mean
annual and monthly canopy transpiration (mm) in the aBASEa (pre-1788)
scenarioData is in geographics and GDA94.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_ctab_r9cl
__01411a16.xml) for more detail.



Tags: geoscientificinformation, maps, models, vegetation
Organization: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences
Monetary Policy Changes

Monetary policy changes are expressed in terms of a target for the cash rate – the interest rate paid or received on unsecured overnight funds in the interbank market. Commencing February 2008, the announcement is made on the day of the Reserve Bank Board meeting, effective the following day. Prior to this time, the announcement and effective dates were the same.


Tags: cashrates, finance, monetary, policy, rba, statistics
Organization: Reserve Bank of Australia