AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Local Historic District

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>The boundaries of the district polygons are both modified and unmodified pre-existing polygons provided by NPS and SHPO, as well as new, previously unmapped districts. For the previously unmapped districts, the boundaries were defined by any maps provided by the associated resource PDF, for resources that lacked a map the boundaries were drawn based on point location. The boundaries of these district polygons may not be reflective of the boundaries as interpreted by local governments.</span></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'></span></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>Please refer to the local ordinances for specific local boundary information.</span></p>
Postive End Point Rates (meters/year)

Shorelines are continuously moving in response to winds, waves, tides, sediment supply, changes in relative sea level, and human activities. Shoreline changes are generally not constant through time and frequently switch from negative (erosion) to positive (accretion) and vice versa. Cyclic and non-cyclic processes change the position of the shoreline over a variety of timescales, from the daily and seasonal effects of winds and waves, to changes in sea level over a century to thousands of years. The shoreline "rate of change" statistic thus reflects a cumulative summary of the processes that altered the shoreline for the time period analyzed.
CT 2021 Summer Aerial Imagery (NAIP 4-band, 0.6 meter)

This image service is available through <a href='https://cteco.uconn.edu/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>CTECO</a>, a partnership between <a href='https://clear.uconn.edu/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>UConn CLEAR</a> and <a href='https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/GIS-and-Maps/Data/GIS-DATA' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>CT DEEP</a>. It is a virtual mosaic of GeoTIFF tiles covering the state of Connecticut. <div><br /></div><div><b><font color='#104C9B'>Dataset Information </font></b></div><div><b>Extent:</b> Connecticut </div><div><b>Dates:</b> 2021: September 4 - November 6</div><div><b>Bands:</b> 4 (red, green, blue, near-infrared) </div><div><b>Pixel resolution</b>: 0.6m</div><div><b>Image Tile Projection:</b> NAD83 UTM Zone 18N and 19N</div><div><b>Service Projection:</b> WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere (EPSG 3857)<br /></div><div><b>Tide Coordinated:</b> No </div><div><br /></div><div><b><font color='#104C9B'>More Information</font></b> </div><div>-  <a href='https://naip-image-dates-usdaonline.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/57299f7988c5400a928d40f1eac4a28d_0/about' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>2021 CT NAIP Image Dates</a> (the eastern part of the state was captured in September and the western in November. The differences in seasonality and leaf cover cause the imagery to look significantly different depending on the date of capture).  </div><div>- <a href='https://naip-usdaonline.hub.arcgis.com/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) GeoHub</a></div><div>- <a href='https://cteco.uconn.edu/data/imagery/index.htm' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>All about Aerial Imagery on CT ECO</a><br /></div><div>- <a href='https://coastalimagery.blob.core.windows.net/digitalcoast/CT_NAIP_2021_9592/index.html' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>Metadata</a> </div><div><br /></div><div><b><font color='#104C9B'>Credit and Funding</font></b></div><div>National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP), United States Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency (USDA FSA)</div>
Electronic Cigarette Products Tax Due

As of October 2019, a tax is imposed on the first sale or use in Connecticut of any electronic cigarette product at a rate of either (1) $0.40 per milliliter of the electronic cigarette liquid contained within an electronic cigarette product that is prefilled, sealed by the manufacturer and not intended to be refillable, or (2) 10% of the wholesale sales price of any other electronic cigarette product.
Connecticut Broadband Availability Data by Block 2024

Public Act 21-159 established a state goal of universal access to 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload across the State of Connecticut. This map shows progress to that goal. At the town level, the map includes both availability and adoption data for 1000/100 packages while the block level shows only availability.<div>This map uses OPM collected availability and adoption data <div><br /></div><div><b>As of 2023, OPM collected availability data</b> was submitted by internet service providers pursuant to PA 21-159 and processed by the GIS Office in the Office of Policy and Management, cleaned, and matched to the CostQuest location fabric.</div><div><br /></div><div>Metadata:</div><div>All feature layers, maps, and datasets including OPM's internal broadband availability data follows the same basic schema with additional fields added in some case for convenience.</div><div><br /></div><div>Fields named no service, unserved, underserved, served, and GigC are counts of locations where a particular level of broadband service is provided, No service locations are those where there is no reported service at all. Unserved locations are locations where there is a provider offering wireline service, but not at or above 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload. Underserved locations are locations where at least one provider offers wireline service of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload, but there is no provider offering wireline service of 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Served locations are locations where there is wireline service of at least 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. GigC denotes the count of locations that have service at 1000 Mbps download and 100 Mbps upload. <b>Accordingly, <u>total locations is equal to the sum of no service, unserved, underserved, served, and &quot;GigC&quot; locations. </u></b>Availability also includes fields for average download and upload speeds. These are calculated at the relevant level of census geography based on the maximum for all locations.</div><div><br /></div><div>The final field included in all availability data is the provider list. </div><div><br /></div><div>Link to town layer: <a href='https://ctmaps.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=db48863d729149b79fac4fd09532bedb' rel='nofollow ugc'>Connecticut Broadband Availability Data by Town 2024</a></div><div><br /></div></div>
Child Protective Service Reports Accepted by State Fiscal Year, Response Time and Type

This dataset contains aggregate data by State Fiscal Year of all child abuse/neglect reports accepted by DCF CareLine for either a traditional Child Protective Services (CPS) Investigation or, as of SFY2012, a Family Assessment Response (FAR).  Figures are provided by mandated Response Time and Response Type, for each DCF Area Office beginning with SFY2011.  Each report accepted is screened for safety and risk factors, and assigned an amount of time within which the agency is required to respond to the report.  Mandated response times include “Same Day”, “24 Hours”, and “72 Hours”.  Traditionally, DCF responded to all reports through a Child Protective Services (CPS) Investigation only.  As of April 2012, DCF began its Family Assessment Response (FAR) to low-risk reports which does not include the decision to substantiate or not to substantiate the allegations of neglect in these reports.  As a result, there have been fewer substantiated allegations since its implementation but, the agency continues to serve as many or more families reported for abuse/neglect.
Quaternary Geology Point Features

<div><a href='https://www.cteco.uconn.edu/guides/Quaternary_Geology.htm' rel='nofollow ugc' target='_blank'>See full Data Guide here. </a><br /></div>Quaternary Geology Feature Set is 1:24,000-scale data that illustrates the geologic features formed in Connecticut during the Quaternary Period, which spans from 2.588 ± 0.005 million years ago to the present and includes the Pleistocene (glacial) and Holocene (postglacial) Epochs. The Quaternary Period has been a time of development of many details of the Connecticut landscape and all surficial deposits. At least twice in the last Pleistocene, continental ice sheets swept across Connecticut from the north. Their effects are of pervasive importance to present-day occupants of the land.

The Quaternary Geology information illustrates the geologic history and the distribution of depositional environments during the emplacement of unconsolidated glacial and postglacial surficial deposits and the landforms resulting from those events in Connecticut. These deposits range from a few feet to several hundred feet in thickness, overlie the bedrock surface and underlie the organic soil layer of Connecticut. Quaternary Geology is mapped without regard for any organic soil layer that may overly the deposit.

For additional documentation including a description of the unconsolidated glacial and postglacial surficial deposits shown on the map, refer to the CT ECO Complete Resource Guide for Quaternary Geology.

The Connecticut Quaternary Geology information was initially compiled at 1:24,000 scale (1 inch = 2,000 feet) then recompiled for a statewide 1:125,000-scale map, Quaternary Geology Map of Connecticut and Long Island Sound Basin (PDF, 56 Mb) Stone, J.R., Schafer, J.P., London, E.H. and Thompson, W.B., 1992, U.S. Geological Survey Special Map, 2 sheets, scale 1:125,000, and pamphlet, 71 p. A companion map, the Surficial Materials Map of Connecticut (PDF, 26 Mb) Stone, J.R., Schafer, J.P., London, E.H., DiGiacomo-Cohen, M.L., Lewis, R.L., and Thompson, W.B., 2005, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Map 2784, 2 sheets, scale 1:125,000, emphasizes the surface and subsurface texture (grain-size distribution) of these materials. The quaternary geology and surficial material features portrayed on these two maps are very closely related; each contributes to the interpretation of the other.
Impaired 2016 River Lake Estuary Set

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>Connecticut 303(d) Impaired Waters 2016 is a subset of Connecticut 305(b) Assessed Waters 2016. If any one of the assigned designated uses is categorized as NOT Supporting, the assessed waterbody is included in this subset and is considered impaired. Additional information about Integrated Water Quality reporting is available on the CT DEEP website, <a href='https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Water/Water-Quality/Water-Quality-305b-Report-to-Congress' style='color:rgb(0, 121, 193); text-decoration-line:none; font-family:inherit;' rel='nofollow ugc'>Integrated Water Quality Report</a> page. </font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>Connecticut 305(b) Assessed Waters files includes rivers, lakes and estuaries that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.</font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>This assessment is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2016. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. Depending on the type of waterbody - river, lake, or estuary - this information geographically displays attainment and non-attainment (e.g. full supporting, not supporting, not assessed) for each designated use - aquatic life, marine aquatic life, recreation use, fish consumption, shellfish harvesting, and drinking water supply.</font></p>
Impaired Lake 2014

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>Connecticut 303(d) Impaired Waters 2014 is a subset of Connecticut 305(b) Assessed Waters 2014. If any one of the assigned designated uses is categorized as NOT Supporting, the assessed waterbody is included in this subset and is considered impaired. Additional information about Integrated Water Quality reporting is available on the CT DEEP website, <a href='https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Water/Water-Quality/Water-Quality-305b-Report-to-Congress' style='color:rgb(0, 121, 193); text-decoration-line:none; font-family:inherit;' rel='nofollow ugc'>Integrated Water Quality Report</a> page. </font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>Connecticut 305(b) Assessed Waters files includes rivers, lakes and estuaries that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.</font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>This assessment is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2014. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. Depending on the type of waterbody - river, lake, or estuary - this information geographically displays attainment and non-attainment (e.g. full supporting, not supporting, not assessed) for each designated use - aquatic life, marine aquatic life, recreation use, fish consumption, shellfish harvesting, and drinking water supply.</font></p>
Childhood Lead Poisoning: 10-Year Prevalence in Top 5 Cities

As of January 1, 2009, Connecticut law mandates that medical providers must conduct annual lead screening (i.e., blood lead testing) for each child 9 to 35 months of age. Furthermore, the law requires that any child between 36-72 months of age who has not been previously tested must also be tested by the child’s medical provider, regardless of risk.

This dataset includes the 10-year prevalence in Connecticut's top five cities.
Environmental Sensitivity Index 2002 Polygon

Environmental Sensitivity Index 2002 Set:

This data set contains vector lines representing the shoreline and coastal habitats of Connecticut classified according to the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) classification system. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources.The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources.

This data set contains vector polygons representing the shoreline and coastal habitats of Connecticut classified according to the Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) classification system. ESI data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife by their sensitivity to spilled oil. The ESI data include information for three main components: shoreline habitats, sensitive biological resources, and human-use resources. The ESI data were collected, mapped, and digitized to provide environmental data for oil spill planning and response. The Clean Water Act with amendments by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires response plans for immediate and effective protection of sensitive resources.
Prescription Monitoring Program: Schedule V Drug Prescriptions Dispensed

This dataset includes the amount of Schedule V prescription drugs, dispensed over a 3-month span. On the controlled substance Schedule II-V; Schedule V prescription drugs have a lower potential for abuse relative to substances in Schedule IV. Schedule V prescription drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. It only includes dispensations to CT residents reported to the CT Prescription Monitoring & Reporting System (CPMRS).
COVID-19 Cases in CT Schools By School (Current Report Period), 2022-2023 School Year - Archive

This dataset provides the number of weekly COVID-19 cases for staff and students in CT PK-12 schools by school for the current report period during the 2022-2023 school year.

Data by school for all report periods can be found here:  https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-in-CT-Schools-by-School-2022-2023-S/28yj-d752
Impaired Estuary 2010

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>Connecticut 303(d) Impaired Waters 2010 is a subset of Connecticut 305(b) Assessed Waters 2010. If any one of the assigned designated uses is categorized as NOT Supporting, the assessed waterbody is included in this subset and is considered impaired. Additional information about Integrated Water Quality reporting is available on the CT DEEP website, <a href='https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Water/Water-Quality/Water-Quality-305b-Report-to-Congress' style='color:rgb(0, 121, 193); text-decoration-line:none; font-family:inherit;' rel='nofollow ugc'>Integrated Water Quality Report</a> page. </font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>Connecticut 305(b) Assessed Waters files includes rivers, lakes and estuaries that have been assessed in compliance with Sections 305(b) and 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each state to monitor, assess and report on the quality of its waters relative to attainment of designated uses established by the State's water quality standards. Section 303(d) requires each State to compile a subset of that list identifying only those waters not meeting water quality standards and assign a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) priority ranking to each impaired waterbody.</font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><font size='2' style='font-family:inherit;'>This assessment is based on information collected and compiled prior to 2010. It represents conditions at a particular point in time and does not represent current conditions. Depending on the type of waterbody - river, lake, or estuary - this information geographically displays attainment and non-attainment (e.g. full supporting, not supporting, not assessed) for each designated use - aquatic life, marine aquatic life, recreation use, fish consumption, shellfish harvesting, and drinking water supply.</font></p>
Fitch's Home for Soldiers Deceased Veterans Files Index 1882-1936

Connecticut State Archives Archival Record Group (RG) #073, Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Fitch’s Home for Soldiers

Fitch’s Home for Soldiers and Orphans (1863-1940), also known as the Noroton Home, located in Darien, Connecticut, was first erected by Benjamin Fitch and was dedicated July 4, 1864. In 1887, the State assumed control and renamed the home Fitch’s Home for Soldiers.

At the Fitch’s Home, many of the State’s Civil War Veterans were cared for, as well as Veterans of the Spanish American War and World War I. Due to its limited facilities and the increase of returning veterans, the Veterans Home and Hospital Commission sought to relocate the Home. The new Veterans Home and Hospital was opened in Rocky Hill on August 28, 1940.

The Deceased Veterans Discharge Files, 1882-1936, consists of approximately 2300 veterans’ files from the Fitch’s Home for Soldiers. Although the veterans listed served primarily in the Civil War, a few Spanish American veterans are included. The files are arranged by file number. Each file contains the veteran’s name, unit, residence, date of admission, and pension certificate number.

People may request a copy of a file by contacting the staff of the History & Genealogy Unit by telephone (860) 757-6580 or email. When requesting a copy of a record, please include at least the name of the individual and date.

Abbreviations of Connecticut Military Branch of Service:

CLB – Connecticut Light Battery
CVA – Connecticut Volunteer Artillery
CVC – Connecticut Volunteer Cavalry
CVC – Connecticut Volunteer Cavalry
CVHA – Connecticut Volunteer Heavy Artillery
CVI – Connecticut Volunteer Infantry
State Route Local Names

A custom basemap created for internal Connecticut Department of Transportation in web apps and maps.<div><br /></div><div>The basemap represents the most recent and active Public Road Network as maintained by the Bureau of Policy &amp; Planning's Roadway Inventory Unit and is updated on an annual basis.</div><div><br /></div><div>Map styling mimics the format of an Open Street Maps style basemap and routes are differentiated by their prefix (e.g. Interstate, US, CT, etc.) with local roads sharing the same symbiology across the state.</div><div><br /></div><div><span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>At closer zoom levels, ortho imagery from 2019 appears within the map extent.</span><br /></div>