AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
CDTFA SalesandUseTaxRates Public

<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div style='font-size:12pt;'><p><span>California Department of Tax and Fee Administration sales and use tax rates by jurisdiction. This data is used by the Find Your Tax Rate application to determine the tax rate of an address. https://maps.cdtfa.ca.gov .&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>There are two layers. Layer 1 is the main tax rate map and layer 0 contains additional Tax Area Code (TAC) field with additional geometry for redevelopment areas.&nbsp;</span></p></div></div></div>
California Sales and Use Tax Rates

<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div style='font-size:12pt;'><p><span>California Department of Tax and Fee Administration sales and use tax rates by jurisdiction. This data is used by the Find Your Tax Rate application to determine the tax rate of an address. https://maps.cdtfa.ca.gov .&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>There are two layers. Layer 1 is the main tax rate map and layer 0 contains additional Tax Area Code (TAC) field with additional geometry for redevelopment areas.&nbsp;</span></p></div></div></div>
2017 Clifton Court Forebay Predator Reduction Electrofishing Study

The Clifton Court Forebay (CCF) Predator Reduction Electrofishing Study (PRES) was implemented in response to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) letter dated April 9, 2015, requiring that the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) immediately implement interim measure (a) of condition 3 as part of the larger effort to comply with Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Action IV.4.2(2) of the 2009 Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the Long-term Operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project. The PRES length was three years, beginning with a pilot year effort in 2016, a 2017 effort to refine methods and determine the main factors affecting predator catch, particularly spatial patterns, and a 2018 effort focused on maximizing predator removal based on knowledge gained during the 2016 and 2017 campaigns. The PRES involved electroshocking and removing predators from CCF and transporting them to Bethany Reservoir with the goal of decreasing pre-screen loss of protected fish species with an emphasis on Chinook Salmon and steelhead.

During the 2017 field effort we focused on refining methods based on lessons learned and recommendations from the 2016 effort, determining spatial and temporal patterns in predator catch rates using a standardized electrofishing sampling regime, and assessing environmental variables that may affect catch rates. In addition, we assessed factors contributing to mortality of predators transported to Bethany Reservoir and conducted preliminary analysis to evaluate evidence of black bass depletion in shoreline habitats; it is important to emphasize that predator depletion was not a PRES objective in 2017, but was informative for the 2018 season.
2018 Clifton Court Forebay Predator Reduction Electrofishing Study

The Clifton Court Forebay (CCF) Predator Reduction Electrofishing Study (PRES) was implemented in response to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) letter dated April 9, 2015, requiring that the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) immediately implement interim measure (a) of condition 3 as part of the larger effort to comply with Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Action IV.4.2(2) of the 2009 Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the Long-term Operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project. The PRES length was three years, beginning with a pilot year effort in 2016, a 2017 effort to refine methods and determine the main factors affecting predator catch, and the 2018 effort focused on maximizing predator removal based on knowledge gained during the 2016 and 2017 campaigns. The PRES involved electroshocking and removing predators from CCF and transporting them to Bethany Reservoir with the goal of decreasing pre-screen loss of protected fish species with an emphasis on Chinook Salmon and steelhead.

During the 2018 field effort we focused on maximizing removal of predatory fish based on lessons learned and recommendations from the 2016 and 2017 efforts. Effort increased by fishing 4 days per week using 3 concurrent electrofishing boats (2017 field work used 2 boats on 3 days per week). Fishing removals focused primarily on the locations with highest catch rates identified in 2017: the Intake Canal, Scour Hole, and shore lines. In addition, sunfish species were added to the list of predatory fish removed.
California State Fleet

This dataset contains information on all non-confidential assets within the California State Vehicle Fleet. The purpose of this data is to provide vehicle information including sustainability measurements such as fuel types. The data is extracted from the Fleet Asset Management System utilized by the Department of General Services’ Office of Fleet and Asset Management. The dataset covers the timeframe from the calendar year 2015 until the calendar year 2025 and includes vehicle information reported by all agencies under the executive branch and constitutional offices.
2019 Clifton Court Forebay Predatory Fish Relocation Study

The Clifton Court Forebay (CCF) Predatory Fish Relocation Study (PFRS) was implemented in response to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) letter dated April 9, 2015. The letter required the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) to immediately implement interim measure (a) of condition 3 as part of the larger effort to comply with Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Action IV.4.2(2) of the 2009 Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the Long-term Operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project (NMFS BiOp; NMFS 2009). The PFRS was two years in duration. The 2019 field season was an initial attempt to test the effectiveness of five commercial-type fishing gears and to acquire the necessary information to advise any gear modifications and method refinements to improve catch effectiveness. The PFRS involved capturing and relocating predators from CCF to Bethany Reservoir with the goal of decreasing pre-screen loss of protected fish species with an emphasis on Chinook Salmon and steelhead.

Predatory fish included black basses, catfish, and Striped Bass. Three “active” gears (beach seines, lampara nets, Kodiak trawls) were deployed, pulled through the water, and retrieved by field staff. Two “passive” gears (hoop traps and fyke traps) were placed in the water for ~24 h for each sample to collect predatory fish and then retrieved by field staff. Field work typically occurred 4 days per week between 3/1/2019 and 6/4/2019 with 3-4 gears conducted each day.
2020 Clifton Court Forebay Predatory Fish Relocation Study

The Clifton Court Forebay (CCF) Predatory Fish Relocation Study (PFRS) was implemented in response to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) letter dated April 9, 2015. The letter required the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) immediately implement interim measure (a) of condition 3 as part of the larger effort to comply with Reasonable and Prudent Alternative (RPA) Action IV.4.2(2) of the 2009 Biological Opinion and Conference Opinion on the Long-term Operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project (NMFS BiOp; NMFS 2009). The PFRS involved capturing and relocating predatory fish from CCF to Bethany Reservoir with the goal of reducing pre-screen loss of protected fish species, particularly Chinook Salmon and steelhead.

The PFRS was two years in duration. The Water Year 2019 field season (2019 field season) tested the effectiveness of 5 commercial-type fishing gears and acquired data and other information to advise any gear modifications and method refinements to improve catch effectiveness. The Water Year 2020 field season (2020 field season) incorporated knowledge gained from the 2019 field season to modify and refine the gears and their methodologies to maximize predatory fish capture.
2021 Enhanced Predatory Fish Removal and Relocation Study

The Enhanced Predatory Fish Removal and Relocation Study (EPFRRS) was developed as part of the proposed action during the 2019 Reinitiation of Consultation on Long-Term Operation of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (ROC on LTO) and was included in the Incidental Take Permit for the State Water Project (SWP ITP). The goal of EPFRRS is to use the most successful methods from previous studies, such as the Predator Reduction Electrofishing Study (PRES) and the Predatory Fish Relocation Study (PFRS), to reduce predation on protected fish species in Clifton Court Forebay (CCF), primarily juvenile Chinook Salmon and steelhead.

The 2021 field season of EPFRRS ran from March 8 through May 12, following a two-month delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, there was a 2-week pause during the field season, beginning on April 14 and running through April 27, due to COVID-19 concerns. There were four gear types used during the 2021 field season; electrofishing, beach seine, hoop traps, and hook-and-line.
Medi-Cal Enrollment by Eligibility Group

This dataset includes the total number of individuals enrolled in Medi-Cal by eligibility group: Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI), non-MAGI, and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). The groups are defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Performance Indicators (CMSPI) reporting requirements. The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) submits eligibility and enrollment data regarding Medicaid and CHIP monthly to CMS. The enrollment data represents enrollment totals as of 60 days after the eligibility month (indicated as “Reporting Period” in the dataset). CMS publishes the state total enrollments on the CMSPI website. The total enrollment comprises of individuals who are eligible for full scope Medi-Cal by MAGI – Child, MAGI – Adult, Non-MAGI Child, Non-MAGI Adult, and CHIP eligibility groups. DHCS does not report to CMS the total enrollment in limited scope Medi-Cal or state-only funded programs (indicated as the “Non-CMSPI” in the dataset).
2023 Enhanced Predatory Fish Removal and Relocation Study

The Enhanced Predatory Fish Removal and Relocation Study (EPFRRS) was implemented from March 2021 through June 2023. The EPFRRS was included in the proposed action for the 2019 state and federal endangered species consultation for the long-term operations of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project. The goal of the EPFRRS was to use the most successful methods from previous predator relocation studies conducted by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) from 2016 to 2020, including the Predator Reduction Electrofishing Study (PRES) and the Predatory Fish Relocation Study (PFRS), to reduce predation mortality on protected fish species in Clifton Court Forebay (CCF), primarily juvenile Chinook Salmon and steelhead.

In 2023, predator collection and relocation were conducted from January 3 through June 1. Cancellations occurred during inclement weather conditions that made sampling unsafe (e.g., high winds or rain). There were three gear types used during the 2023 effort: electrofishing, beach seining, and hoop trapping. Electrofishing consisted of two to three electrofishing boats focusing on hotspots identified during the PRES and during the 2021 and 2022 EPFRRS efforts. Hoop traps were deployed for 24-48 hours of passive fishing, when possible, given SWP operations. When hoop traps could not be fished and an additional electrofishing boat was available, the third electrofishing boat was fished instead. Predatory fish removed included black basses, Striped Bass, catfish, and sunfish. However, sunfish were removed opportunistically and were not specifically fished for. Fieldwork was scheduled for four days a week each week. In total, predator relocation was conducted on 48 days during the 2023 field season, which is more than the 2021 field season (26.5 days) which was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, despite the field season being shorter by nearly a month, the 2022 field season had more days the field (55 days), primarily due to weather conditions.
Community Care Licensing Facilities

<p><span style='color:black;'><strong>Community Care Licensing Division</strong></span></p><p><span style='color:black;'>The Community Care Licensing Division’s (CCLD) mission is to promote the health, safety, and quality of life of each person in community care through the administration of an effective collaborative regulatory enforcement system. This is accomplished by:</span></p><ul><li><span>Promoting strategies to increase voluntary compliance</span></li><li><span>Providing technical assistance to and consulting with care providers</span></li><li><span>Working collaboratively with clients, their families, advocates, care providers, placement agencies, related programs and regulatory agencies, and others involved in community care</span></li><li><span>Training staff in all aspects of the licensing process</span></li><li><span>Educating the public about CCLD and community care options</span></li><li><span>Promoting continuous improvement and efficiency throughout the community care licensing system</span></li></ul>
Juvenile Salmonid Collection System (JSCS) Pilot Project Fish and Environmental Data – McCloud River  and Shasta Reservoir (2022–2025)

The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) conducted the Juvenile Salmonid Collection System (JSCS) Pilot Project from 2022 — 2025 to test new methods in fish capture and collect juvenile winter-run Chinook Salmon in the McCloud River (Wintu name: Winnemem Waywaket) as part of the greater effort to assess the feasibility of Chinook Salmon reintroduction above Shasta Dam. The goal of the JSCS Pilot Project was to test the performance of the JSCS structure in the McCloud Arm of Shasta Reservoir and to design, fabricate, and test configurations of the JSCS fish trap. DWR tested initial structural components of the JSCS in Shasta Reservoir in 2022 and operated the complete system at five sites across the reservoir–riverine interface in the McCloud Arm of Shasta Reservoir 2023 — 2024. Based on the results for those years, DWR redesigned the trap (JSCS V2) and deployed it in riverine conditions downstream of the McCloud Bridge Campground between September 30 — December 1, 2025. This dataset summarizes the data collected for the pilot study including environmental data collected on and around the JSCS fish trap, structural performance data for the JSCS fish trap, and fish capture data from the JSCS fish trap.

__Suggested Citation__: California Department of Water Resources. 2026. _Juvenile Salmonid Collection System (JSCS) Pilot Project fish and environmental data—McCloud River and Shasta Reservoir (2022–2025)_. California Department of Water Resources. https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/jscs-pilot-project-2022-2025. Accessed [Month Day, Year].
Groundfish Exclusion Areas - R7 - CDFW [ds3164]

<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span><span>This dataset depicts the eight Groundfish Exclusion Areas located in the Southern California Bight in the area formerly encompassed by the Cowcod Conservation Areas. The Groundfish Exclusion Areas restrict take and possession of groundfish, except for purposes of continuous transit. Fishing for non-groundfish stocks is permitted provided no groundfish are aboard. Located north of Santa Barbara Island, the Hidden Reef GEA measures 5.7 by 6.6 miles. The West of Santa Barbara Island GEA measures 12.6 by 7.9 miles. Located west of San Nicolas Island, the Potato Bank GEA measures 8.5 by 13.8 miles. To the south-west of San Nicolas Island, the 107/118 Bank GEA measures 9.1 by 6.8 miles. Located north/north-west of Tanner Bank, Cherry Bank GEA measures 13.9 by 3.9 miles, with the Seamount 109 GEA measuring 19.8 by 3.7 miles (on the southern end) located west of the bank. Roughly 25 miles west of Cortes Bank, the Northeast Bank GEA measures 6.3 by 10.1 miles. Roughly 49 miles west of San Diego, the</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span><span>43-Fathom Spot GEA measures 8.0 by 11.2 miles</span></span><span><span>.</span></span></p><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span /><span /></p><p style='margin:0 0 0 0;'><span style='font-weight:bold;'>Attributes</span></p><ul><li><p><span>ID: ID for each GEA.</span></p></li><li><p><span>AreaName: Informal Description of each area.  </span></p></li></ul></div></div></div>
Licensed and Certified Health Care Facilities

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:10px; box-sizing:border-box;'><font size='3'><font color='#333333' face='Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif'>Note: This web page provides data on health facilities only. To file a complaint against a facility, please see: </font><a href='https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHCQ/LCP/Pages/FileAComplaint.aspx' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHCQ/LCP/Pages/FileAComplaint.aspx</a></font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:10px; box-sizing:border-box;'><font color='#333333' face='Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif' size='3'>The California Department of Public Health (CDPH), Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification (L&amp;C) Program licenses and certifies more than 30 types of healthcare facilities. The Electronic Licensing Management System (ELMS) is a CDPH data system created to manage state licensing-related data and enforcement actions. This file includes California healthcare facilities that are operational and have a current license issued by the CDPH and/or a current U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) certification.</font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:10px; box-sizing:border-box;'><font color='#333333' face='Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif' size='3'>To link the CDPH facility IDs with those from other Departments, like HCAI, please reference the &quot;Licensed Facility Cross-Walk&quot; Open Data table at https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/licensed-facility-crosswalk. Facility geographic variables are updated monthly, if latitude/longitude information is missing at any point in time, it should be available when the next time the Open Data facility file is refreshed.</font></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:10px; box-sizing:border-box;'><font color='#333333' face='Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif' size='3'>Please note that the file contains the data from ELMS as of the 11th business day of the month. See DATA_DATE variable for the specific date of when the data was extracted.</font></p>
Statewide Death Profiles

This dataset contains counts of deaths for California as a whole based on information entered on death certificates. Final counts are derived from static data and include out-of-state deaths to California residents, whereas provisional counts are derived from incomplete and dynamic data. Provisional counts are based on the records available when the data was retrieved and may not represent all deaths that occurred during the time period. Deaths involving injuries from external or environmental forces, such as accidents, homicide and suicide, often require additional investigation that tends to delay certification of the cause and manner of death. This can result in significant under-reporting of these deaths in provisional data.

The final data tables include both deaths that occurred in California regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence) and deaths to California residents (by residence), whereas the provisional data table only includes deaths that occurred in California regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence). The data are reported as totals, as well as stratified by age, gender, race-ethnicity, and death place type. Deaths due to all causes (ALL) and selected underlying cause of death categories are provided. See temporal coverage for more information on which combinations are available for which years.

The cause of death categories are based solely on the underlying cause of death as coded by the International Classification of Diseases. The underlying cause of death is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury." It is a single value assigned to each death based on the details as entered on the death certificate. When more than one cause is listed, the order in which they are listed can affect which cause is coded as the underlying cause. This means that similar events could be coded with different underlying causes of death depending on variations in how they were entered. Consequently, while underlying cause of death provides a convenient comparison between cause of death categories, it may not capture the full impact of each cause of death as it does not always take into account all conditions contributing to the death.
Death Profiles by County

This dataset contains counts of deaths for California counties based on information entered on death certificates. Final counts are derived from static data and include out-of-state deaths to California residents, whereas provisional counts are derived from incomplete and dynamic data. Provisional counts are based on the records available when the data was retrieved and may not represent all deaths that occurred during the time period. Deaths involving injuries from external or environmental forces, such as accidents, homicide and suicide, often require additional investigation that tends to delay certification of the cause and manner of death. This can result in significant under-reporting of these deaths in provisional data.

The final data tables include both deaths that occurred in each California county regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence) and deaths to residents of each California county (by residence), whereas the provisional data table only includes deaths that occurred in each county regardless of the place of residence (by occurrence). The data are reported as totals, as well as stratified by age, gender, race-ethnicity, and death place type. Deaths due to all causes (ALL) and selected underlying cause of death categories are provided. See temporal coverage for more information on which combinations are available for which years.

The cause of death categories are based solely on the underlying cause of death as coded by the International Classification of Diseases. The underlying cause of death is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury." It is a single value assigned to each death based on the details as entered on the death certificate. When more than one cause is listed, the order in which they are listed can affect which cause is coded as the underlying cause. This means that similar events could be coded with different underlying causes of death depending on variations in how they were entered. Consequently, while underlying cause of death provides a convenient comparison between cause of death categories, it may not capture the full impact of each cause of death as it does not always take into account all conditions contributing to the death.
Average Transit Speeds by Stop

<div style="text-align:Left;"><div><div><p><span>All day and peak transit 20th, 50th, and 80th percentile speeds on segments estimated on a single day for all CA transit operators that provide GTFS real-time vehicle positions data. Segments are primarily stop to stop, but if stops are farther than 1km apart, additional segments between those stops will be added at 1km intervals.</span></p></div></div></div>