AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
i03 Proposition1 Funding Areas

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>This data depicts California Proposition 1 Funding Area boundaries as defined by Water Code §79744, which states, &quot;(a) Of the funds authorized by Section 79740, five hundred ten million dollars ($510,000,000) shall be allocated to the hydrologic regions as identified in the California Water Plan in accordance with this section. For the South Coast hydrologic region, the department shall establish three funding areas that reflect the watersheds of San Diego County and southern Orange County (designated as the San Diego subregion), the Santa Ana River watershed (designated as the Santa Ana subregion), and the Los Angeles and Ventura County watersheds (designated as the Los Angeles subregion), and shall allocate funds to those areas in accordance with this subdivision. The North and South Lahontan hydrologic regions shall be treated as one area for the purpose of allocating funds. For purposes of this subdivision, the Sacramento River hydrologic region does not include the Delta. For purposes of this subdivision, the Mountain Counties Overlay is not eligible for funds from the Sacramento River hydrologic region or the San Joaquin River hydrologic region. Multiple integrated regional water management plans may be recognized in each of the areas allocated funding.&quot; Key differences between the old and new P1 FAs data set (original/proposed data set, respectively): 1. Line-work along the coastline formerly excluded much detail (bays, inlets, piers, lagoons, etc.); the new proposed dataset more closely follows the i03_Hydrologic_Regions data set. Hence, this data set includes more line detail along the coastline. 2. Line-work forming the P1 FAs between the Southwest portion of the San Joaquin River funding area and Northwest portion of the Tulare/Kern funding area was inconsistent between the two data sets. This data set corrects this notable discrepancy.</span>
i03 RegionalFloodManagementPlanBoundaries

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>Following adoption of the 2012 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (2012 CVFPP), DWR funded six regionally-led Regional Flood Management Plans (RFMPs) that describe local and regional flood management priorities and challenges. These RFMPs also identify potential funding mechanisms and site-specific improvement needs.</span></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>The Regional Flood Management Planning Regions (RFMP) boundaries were created from the 2013 Levee Flood Protection Zones (LFPZs). Waterways were filled in and the boundaries were broken into the six planning areas by GEI Consultants Inc.</span></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>This is the second generation of study areas after the 2012 CVFPP for more specific regional planning efforts with local agencies.</span></p>
i03 SPFCPlanningArea 20100301

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>State Plan of Flood Control (SPFC) Planning Area is the lands currently receiving protection from the SPFC (CWC§ 9651(g)). State's flood management responsibility is limited to this area.</span>
Draft Protected Areas Exclusion (Geothermal) for 2026-2027 IRP

<p><span>The geospatial data reflected in this Protected Area Layer contain minor data versioning and consolidation updates from the</span><a target='_blank' href='https://caenergy.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=0e216708f0c44b2984bf9eded1be0c3f' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><span> previous Protected Area Layer</span></a><span>. This layer extends outside of the geographic boundaries of California to include electrically-in-state southern Nevada and western Arizona areas of the CAISO.&nbsp;The components of the Protected Area Layer mostly pertain to natural and wilderness areas where development of utility-scale renewable energy is prohibited and were heavily based on RETI 1.0 blackout areas. The protected area layer is distinguished for conventional geothermal technology by the latest </span><a target='_blank' href='https://www.blm.gov/programs/fish-and-wildlife/sagegrouse/blm-sagegrouse-plans' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><span>Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat Management Areas</span></a><span style='font-size:8.0pt;'><span style='line-height:116%;'>&nbsp;</span></span><span> (note: the Greater Sage-Grouse Habitat Management Areas provide separate exclusion areas for solar, wind and geothermal resources).</span></p><p><span>More information is found in the </span><a target='_blank' href='https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/divisions/energy-division/documents/integrated-resource-plan-and-long-term-procurement-plan-irp-ltpp/2024-2026-irp-cycle-events-and-materials/assumptions-for-the-2026-2027-tpp/final_2025_busbar_mappingmag_presentation_cec.pdf' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><span>CEC presentation</span></a><span> from the August 19 webinar, as well as the 2023 </span><a target='_blank' href='https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/california-energy-planning-library/land-use-screens' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><span>Land Use Screens Staff Report in the CEC Energy Planning Library</span></a><span>.&nbsp;</span><br />&nbsp;</p>
i03 SuisunMarshBoundary

This feature class was digitized from the map, A.B. 1717, by Jeff Galef on August 22, 2012. The features were labeled as being in the Primary or Secondary Zone. The digitizing was done at a 1:4,000 scale. The features were digitized by a map that was georeferenced by Jeff Galef on July 25, 2012. The number of control points used was 25. The RMS error was 13.74340. The georeferencing was performed against the 2009 NAIP imagery, which was projected to UTM Zone 10, NAD 83.Digitizing was difficult since the line borders and the associated colors often did not match up. That is, there was a fair amount of overlap. The decision was made that the digitizing would follow the thick red and black lines where available. Otherwise, the digitizing followed the coloring. This feature class was edited on November 26, 2013 by Terri Fong to reflect the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission's map amendments of 2011. The amendments are described in Resolution No. 11-05 which can be found here: http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/BPA/Final2011.07.01.ResolutionNo1.10.pdf. This resolution changes the size of the Water Related Industry Reserve Area near Collinsville. The current Boundaries of the Suisun Marsh map can be found here: http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/plans/SMboundaries.pdf.
i17 Delta Levees Centerlines 2017

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>In the Delta Anatomy Mapping Project, all levee anatomies were delineated using slope grids built from available LIDAR data points. LIDAR data points were converted to digital elevation models and subsequently into slope grids. Thresholds were identified that capture the levee crown, levee landside, levee waterside, ramps and toe ditches. Visual interpretations of slope thresholds were used in conjunction with heads-up digitizing to maintain smooth boundaries at a scale of 1:550. The delineation thresholds were derived from a combination of mapping scale, slope grid resolution and slope thresholds used for each anatomy classification. All anatomy has gone through internal quality control processes to ensure a minimum accuracy of +/- 3 feet. Once the levee anatomy was created and accepted, the Esri geoprocessing tool &quot;Polygon to Centerline&quot; was used to create a levee crown centerline. From there, the centerlines were merged by LMA, with a single line for each LMA. After the centerlines were accepted and any errors fixed, the centerlines were split by reach and attribute fields (such as project or non-project). This data depicts the levee anatomy at the time of the LiDAR survey (2017) and are only accurate for that time. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was created and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. This data is an update to the previous Atlas dataset with Delta Levee Centerlines, derived from the 2007 Delta LiDAR. Processing and digitizing work done by CA DWR, Division of Engineering, Geodetic Branch, Geospatial Data Support Section, specifically by Arina Ushakova (Research Data Analyst I), and initial QC by Joel Dudas (Senior Engineer, Water Resources).</span>
i03 SystemwidePA 20101007

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>This feature class represents the Systemwide Planning Area. It is one of the three Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (CVFPP) Planning Areas. It is comprised of the following layers:Below are layers that delineate the boundary.1. Levee Flood Protection Zones (LFPZs) developed by DWR as a first estimate of areas potentially inundated due to State Plan of Flood Control (SPFC) levee failure. There are no frequencies associated with these areas. LeveeFloodProtectionZone_20100301 (DWR)2. Comprehensive Study 500 year floodplain delineation (CS_FP_500YR_Dissolve.shp) (DWR)3. 200 year floodplain developed by DWR for the reaches of the Sacramento River upstream of Woodson Bridge which was the limit of the floodplain development for the Comprehensive Study. DWR_FloodPlain_200YR (DWR)4. American River Economic Reevalulation Report (ARERR) 500 Year Floodplain.5. legal_delta.shp6. A 50ft buffer of streams defining the hydrologic connections between multi-purpose or dedicated flood control reservoirs within the WPA.7. Added the multipurpose/Flood Control Reservoirs (MultipurposeReservoirs_20100902.shp)8. If Hydrologic features (Rivers, Channels, bypasses, etc) have SPFC Project levees on BOTH sides of the features… Include areas between two levees.9. If Hydrologic features (Rivers, Channels, bypasses, etc) have SPFC Project levees on ONE sides of the features… Include areas from centerline of the feature to the levees.10. Middle Creek, Adin, and North Fork Feather River project have been added.11. HEC-FDA Impact Areas (the latest version developed with no holes/overlaps) were added as a way of filling in and smoothing the ragged boundaries of the Comprehensive Study 500yr Floodplain.12. Data holes were filled using an automated process and supplemented by visual inspection and manual additions/subtractions.13. Added USACE (Sacrametonto Office - SPK) provided protection areas that intersected the existing SPA except those outside of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Hyrdologic Regions (as defined by CA DWR CalWater 2.2).</span>
i17 Delta Levees Centerlines 2007

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>In the Delta Anatomy Mapping Project, all levee anatomies were delineated using slope grids built from available 2007 Delta LIDAR data points. LIDAR data points were converted to digital elevation models and subsequently into slope grids. Thresholds were identified that capture the levee crown, levee landside, levee waterside, ramps and toe ditches. Visual interpretations of slope thresholds were used in conjunction with heads-up digitizing to maintain smooth boundaries at a scale of 1:550. The delineation thresholds were derived from a combination of mapping scale, slope grid resolution and slope thresholds used for each anatomy classification. All anatomy has gone through internal quality control processes to ensure a minimum accuracy of +/- 3 feet.</span></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>Anatomy data was further reviewed and tested by DWR for compliance with an interpretive mapping standard of 80% accuracy. Once the levee anatomy was created and accepted, isolation and export of the levee crown was used in conjucture with ET Geowizards to collapse the crown to a singular centerline which details the levee route. This data depicts the levee anatomy at the time of the LiDAR survey (2007) and are only accurate for that time. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was created and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions. Changes in some linework and attribution were performed by CA DWR Division of Engineering in September, 2018, and current version was posted to DWR GIS Atlas at that time</span></p>
i03 Adjudicated Areas

<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div><p><span><span>Adjudication is a form of groundwater management in California through the courts. When groundwater resources do not meet water demands in an area, landowners may turn to the courts to determine how much groundwater can be rightfully extracted by each overlying landowner or appropriator. The court typically appoints a Watermaster to administer the judgment and to periodically report to the court. As of 2017 there were 29 adjudicated groundwater basins in California, with the majority of the adjudications located in Southern California in the South Coast hydrologic region. The majority of groundwater rights adjudications in California imposes extraction limits and/or initiates management actions in the event of declining groundwater levels or water quality degradation. It should be noted that the primary objective of an adjudication is to provide a proportionate share of the available groundwater to the users within the basin so it can be extracted without having adverse effects to existing groundwater supplies. Environmental concerns were not considered when most of the judgments were written. Areas designated to be treated as adjudicated areas as defined in Water Code Section 10720.8</span></span></p><p><span /></p></div></div></div>
i17 Delta Levees Anatomy 2017

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>The use of high-resolution LiDAR, and the products derived from it, allow for levee anatomy to be captured for the surveyed area. The resulting data is a catalog of precise levee location and components. This data can further be used for levee maintenance and management, flood modeling and prediction, as well as levee inventories.</span>
i17 Delta Levees Anatomy 2007

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>In the Delta Anatomy Mapping Project all levee anatomies were delineated using slope grids built from available LIDAR data points. LIDAR data points were converted to digital elevation models and subsequently into slope grids. Thresholds were identified that capture the levee crown, levee landside, levee waterside, ramps and toe ditches. Visual interpretations of slope thresholds were used in conjunction with heads-up digitizing to maintain smooth boundaries at a scale of 1:550. The delineation thresholds were derived from a combination of mapping scale, slope grid resolution and slope thresholds used for each anatomy classification. All anatomy has gone through an internal quality control process to ensure a minimum locational quality of +/- 3 feet. Anatomy was further reviewed and tested by DWR for compliance with an interpretive mapping standard of 80% accuracy. This data depicts the levee anatomy at the time of the LiDAR survey (2007) and are only accurate for that time. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this data set was created and some parts of this data may no longer represent actual surface conditions.</span>
i17 California Jurisdictional Dams

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>This dataset is a feature class identifying all dams currently under the jurisdiction of the Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD). The dataset is extracted from DSOD internal records and contains basic information about the dam including the type of construction, basic dimensions such as height, length, and maximum storage capacity; abbreviated owner information to identify the entity legally responsible for the dam; an assessment of the downstream hazard associated with the dam; an assessment of the current condition of the dam; and indication as to whether the dam is operating at a restricted storage level. Several dams span rivers that define county boundaries, so DSOD references the right abutment of the dam to identify the location of the structure and to associate it with a singular administrative subdivision of California. Data version published in April 2024 is an update to the data published in January 2024.</span>
i03 FERCBoundaries

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>Digital GIS feature class of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) P-2426 and P-2100 Boundaries. Descriptions and mapping for the P-2426 and P-2100 were originally field surveyed in NAD_1927 and translated to NAD_1983.</span>
i19 Stormwater Resource Plans Polys

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>The feature dataset contains data representing storm water projects planned in the future throughout regions in California that involve groundwater recharge and direct use. It was used to develop storm water targets for the years 2020 and 2035 per directives to DWR in California Water Code Section 10608.50 (b). As of February 2018, projects included are those proposed to be constructed post 2014.</span>
i19 Stormwater Project Points

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>The feature dataset contains storm water projects planned in the future throughout California that involve groundwater recharge and direct use. It was used to develop storm water targets for the years 2020 and 2035 per directives to DWR in California Water Code Section 10608.50 (b). As of February 2018, projects included are those proposed to be constructed post 2014. Information from various databases was used to compile the project database. More details can be found in Appendix A of the DWR report “Determination of New Statewide Stormwater Targets for Groundwater Recharge and Direct Use Benefitting Urban Water Supply”. Expected public release: March 2018.</span>
i19 Stormwater Permitees Municipal

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>The feature datasets contain Phase 1 and Phase 2 municipal separate stormwater sewer system (MS4s) permittees in California. These draft layers are based on 2010 census data and they have not been updated since 2013 and there are no current plans to include them as a SWRCB web service. Most of the Phase 1 permittees encompass an entire metropolitan area. The Municipal Storm Water Program manages the Phase I Permit Program (serving municipalities over 100,000 people), the Phase II Permit Program (for municipalities less than 100,000), and the Statewide Storm Water Permit for the State of California Department of Transportation. The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) and Regional Water Quality Control Boards (collectively, the Water Boards) implement and enforce the Municipal Storm Water Program.</span>
i19 Stormwater Capture Master Plan LosAngelesDWP Geophysical Polys

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>The feature dataset contains geophysical properties to analyze where obstacles to infiltration exist and where infiltration would be most desirable. Such properties include areas of mapped landslides or liquefaction potential, depth to groundwater, slope, hydrologic soil group, and geology (pervious or impervious). An aquifer classification system was also developed to guide prioritization. Each aquifer underlying Los Angeles was classified according to the ability of LADWP to pump the aquifer for use in LADWP’s distribution network. Each sub-basin in the LADWP model was assigned a Category A (High), B (Medium), or C (Low) depending on its combination of geophysical obstacles and opportunities and aquifer class. Areas categorized as “A” or “High” were those having the fewest hydrogeologic constraints (i.e. few obstacles to infiltration, highly infiltrative soils, permeable aquifers) and were overlying the highest priority aquifers. These would be most conducive to infiltration BMPs. Category “B” or “Medium” areas were somewhat geologically constrained and overlying mid-level priority aquifers. These areas were also considered suitable for infiltration BMPs. Category “C” or “Low” areas contain obstacles to infiltration and/or were overlying low-priority aquifers, making them more conducive to direct use BMPs.</span>
i03 IRWM Regions

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>The Region Acceptance Process (RAP) is a component of the Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Program Guidelines and is used to evaluate and accept an IRWM region into the IRWM grant program. The RAP is not a grant funding application; however, acceptance of the composition of an IRWM region (including the IRWM region’s boundary) into the IRWM grant program is required for DWR IRWM grant funding eligibility.</span></p><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>This dataset includes:</span></p><ul><li><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>the boundaries of the most current IRWM Regions (as submitted to DWR by the respective IRWM planning region)</span></p></li></ul><ul><li><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>their RAP status (Accepted, Not Accepted or Conditional) as conferred by DWR the year each entity participated in the RAP</span></p></li></ul><ul><li><p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1.5rem;'><span style='font-family:inherit;'>a descriptive field noting the date of any subsequent IRWM boundary changes submitted and accepted by DWR</span></p></li></ul>