AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
2020 California Neighborhoods Count: RAND Report

<p style='box-sizing:border-box; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0.875rem; color:rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:adelle, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>The U.S. Constitution mandates that the federal government count all persons living in the United States every ten years. The census is critical to states because its results are used to reapportion seats in the U.S. House of Representatives; guide redistricting; and form the basis for allocating federal funds, such as those used for schools, health services, child care, highways, and emergency services.</p><p style='box-sizing:border-box; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0.875rem; color:rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:adelle, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>In response to long-standing concerns about the accuracy of census data and about a possible undercount, a group of researchers conducted the California Neighborhoods Count (CNC) — the first-ever independent, survey-based enumeration to directly evaluate the accuracy of the U.S. Census Bureau's population totals for a subset of California census blocks.</p><p style='box-sizing:border-box; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0.875rem; color:rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:adelle, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>This 2020 research was intended to produce parallel estimates of the 2020 Census population and housing unit totals at the census block level, employing the same items as the census and using enhanced data collection strategies and exploration of imputation methods. Although the CNC was intended to largely replicate census data collection processes, there were a few methodological differences: For example, much of the address canvassing for the 2020 Census was done in-office, whereas the CNC team undertook a complete in-person address-listing operation that included interviews with residents and door-to-door verification of each structure.</p><p style='box-sizing:border-box; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0.875rem; color:rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:adelle, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>In this report, the researchers detail their methodology and present the enumeration results. They compare the 2020 Census counts with the CNC estimates, describe limitations of their data collection effort, and offer considerations for future data collection.</p>
2020 California Neighborhoods Count: DOF Report

The CNC survey included 26 questions: all of the questions on the 2020 Census form,
five questions on neighborhood quality, and six questions provided by CCC. The CCC
questions were meant to collect information that could be used to help evaluate the
state’s census outreach campaign as well as to assist with planning for any Census 2030
efforts.
This report includes multiple charts that summarize the CNC’s CCC-related questions
and responses. They offer an overview of attitudes toward the decennial count and
households’ plans to participate, or not participate, in different parts of the state and in
areas posing different levels of enumeration challenges.
In general, the survey results indicate high awareness of the census in California,
including in the hardest-to-count areas. <div><br /></div><div><a href='https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2028-1.html' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>The RAND report is available on its website</a>.<br /></div>
California Census 2020 Outreach and Communication Campaign Final Report

More than 39 million people and 14.2 million households span more than 163,000 square miles of Californian’s urban,
suburban and rural communities. California has the fifth largest economy in the world and is the most populous state in
the nation, with nation-leading diversity in race, ethnicity, language and socioeconomic conditions. These characteristics
make California amazingly unique amongst all 50 states, but also present significant challenges to counting every person
and every household, no matter the census year.
A complete and accurate count of a state’s population in a decennial census is essential. The results
of the 2020 Census will inform decisions about allocating hundreds of billions of dollars in federal
funding to communities across the country for hospitals, fire departments, school lunch
programs and other critical programs and services. The data collected by the United States
Census Bureau (referred hereafter as U.S. Census Bureau) also determines the number
of seats each state has in the U.S. House of Representatives and will be used to redraw
State Assembly and Senate boundaries.
California launched a comprehensive Complete Count
Census 2020 Campaign (referred to hereafter as the
Campaign) to support an accurate and complete count
of Californians in the 2020 Census. Due to the state’s
unique diversity and with insights from past censuses, the
Campaign placed special emphasis on the hardest-tocount Californians and those least likely to participate in
the census. The California Complete Count – Census 2020 Office (referred to
hereafter as the Census Office) coordinated the State’s operations to complement
work done nationally by the U.S. Census Bureau to reach those households most likely
to be missed because of barriers, operational or motivational, preventing people from
filling out the census. The Campaign, which began in 2017, included key phases, titled
Educate, Motivate and Activate. Each of these phases were designed to make sure all
Californians knew about the census, how to respond, their information was safe and their
participation would help their communities for the next 10 years.
Census 2020 Campaign: Final Measurement Report

<p style='margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0.75rem; max-width:100%; font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'><span style='max-width:100%; display:inherit;'>The California Complete Count Office (CCCO) implemented the Census 2020 Communications Campaign to provide culturally sensitive and relevant information about Census 2020 to California's 15 hardest-to-count (HTC) populations, with the objective of motivating these populations to complete the 2020 Census form. The campaign combined multi-platform media at the state level with outreach strategies implemented at the region, county and city levels by community partner organizations.</span><div><br /></div></p>
Total Capacity by Owner and County: 2021

<p>Power plant capacity data and map are from the California
Energy Commission. Map depicts total capacity of utility-scale power plant related
at 1MW or more based on owner classification (federal, state, investor-owned utility,
public-owned electric utility, and merchant). Counties without symbols had no
utility-scale plants. Data is from 2021 and is current as of August 19, 2022.
Projecting: NAD 1893 (2011) California (Teale) Albers (Meters). For more
information contact Rebecca Vail at (916) 477-0738 or John Hingtgen at (916)
510-9747.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;</p>
Total Capacity by Type and County: 2021

<p>Energy capacity data and map are from the California Energy Commission.
Map depicts utility scale power plants (with nameplate capacity of 1 MW or
more). Hydroelectric plants are designated as a renewable energy source if their
nameplate capacity is 30 MW or less. Renewables include biomass, geothermal,
solar thermal, solar photovoltaic, small hydroelectric, and wind. Counties
without symbols has not utility-scale plants. Data is from 2021 and is current
as of August 8, 2022. Projecting: NAD 1893 (2011) California (Teale) Albers
(Meters). For more information contact Rebecca Vail at (916) 477-0738 or John Hingtgen
at (916) 510-9747.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;</p>
Total Generation by Type and County: 2018

<p>Reporting requirements for power plants at least 1 MW are in
accordance with 20 CA CCR 304 and 1385. Counties without pie symbols had no
utility-scale (commercial) electric generation installed. Distributed renewable
generation (e.g. rooftop solar) is not included. Map and data from the
California Energy Commission. Energy production data is from the Quarter Fuel
and Energy Report (QFER) and the Wind Performance Report System (WPRS)
databases. Data is from 2018, and is current as of June 2019. Contact Dylan
Kojimoto at (916) 651-0477 or John Hingtgen at (916) 657-4046 for questions.</p>
Total Generation by Type and County: 2019

<div>Reporting requirements for power plants at least 1 MW are in accordance with 20 CA CCR 1304 and 1385. Counties without pie symbols had no utility-scale (commercial) electric generation installed. Distributed renewable generation (e.g. rooftop solar) is not included. Map and data from the California Energy Commission. Energy production data is from the Quarterly Fuel and Energy Report (QFER) and the Wind Performance Reporting System (WPRS) databases. Data is from 2019, and is current as of July 2020. Contact Sam Roodbar at (916) 651-0477 or John Hingtgen at (916) 657-4046 for questions</div>
Total Generation by Type and County: 2021

Energy generation data and map are from the California Energy Commission. Map depicts
utility scale power plants (with nameplate capacity of 1 MW or more). Hydroelectric plants
are designated as a renewable energy source if their nameplate capacity is 30 MW or less.
Renewables include Biomass, Geothermal, Solar Thermal, Solar Photovoltaic, Small
Hydroelectric, and Wind. Counties without symbols had no utility-scale plants. Data is
from 2021 and is current as of October 27, 2022. For more information, contact Rebecca
Vail at Rebecca.Vail@energy.ca.gov or John Hingtgen at John.Hingtgen@energy.ca.gov.
Total Generation by Type and County: 2020

Energy Data is collected for power plants that have a
nameplate capacity of 1 MW or more. Counties without pie
symbols had no utility-scale (commercial) electric generation
installed. Distributed renewable generation (e.g. rooftop
solar) is not included. Map and data originate from the
California Energy Commission Quarterly Fuel and Energy
Reports. Data is from 2020, and is current as of February
2022. For more information, please contact Rebecca Vail at
(916) 477-0738 or John Hingtgen at (916) 510-9747
Utility Natural Gas Capacity and Generation by Type, Heat Rate, and County: 2021

<div>This data originates from the California Energy Commission. Map and data are for 2021 and are current as of June 21, 2023. Projection: NAD 1983 (2011) California (Teale) Albers (Meters). Contact Gordon Huang at (916) 477-0738, or John Hingtgen at (916) 510-9747 for more information. Produced by Rebecca Vail.</div>
Utility Wind Project Size by County and State: 2018

<p></p><p>This map illustrates the variety of average project capacity
sizes across the United States and within the state of California, for wind
projects whose total nameplate capacity is greater than or equal to 1 MW (20 CCR
§ 1385). Average project capacity is a function of the statewide, or
countywide, nameplate capacity and number of projects within the defined area.
The absence of projects in the southeastern United States is arbitrable to low
average wind speeds (United States - Annual Average Wind Speed, AWS True power
and National Renewable Energy Lab), and insufficient hurricane-resistant
technology. 1 August 2019 Produced by the California Energy Commission Projection:
NAD 1983 (2011) USA Congruous Albers Equal-Area Conic Authors: Dylan Kojimoto
(916) 651-0477, John Hingtgen (916) 657-4046, Brandon Davis Data: Energy Information
Administrator (EIA-860) and Wind Performance Reporting System (WPRS)</p>
Utility Wind Project Size by County and State: 2019

This map illustrates the variety of median project capacity sizes across the United States for wind projects whose total nameplate capacity is greater than or equal to 1 MW. The absence of projects in the southeastern United States is attributable to low average wind speeds (United States - Annual Average Wind Speed, AWS Truepower and National Renewable Energy Lab). Hurricane strength winds are not usable with current technology. Median project capacity is a function of the statewide capacity and the number of projects within the defined area. Data is from 2019 and is current as of Oct. 2020. Contact Sam Roodbar at (916) 651-0477 or John Hingtgen at (916) 510-9747 for questions. Data retrieved from Energy Information Administration (EIA-860) and Wind Performance Reporting System (WPRS)
Utility Wind Project Size by County and State: 2020

<p>This map illustrates the variety of median project capacity
sizes across the United States and California counties for wind projects whose
total nameplate capacity is greater than or equal to 1 MW. The absence of
projects in the southeastern United States is attributable to low average wind
speeds (United States - Annual Average Wind Speed, AWS Truepower and National
Renewable Energy Lab). Hurricane strength winds are not usable with current technology.
Median project capacity is a function of the statewide capacity and the number
of projects within the defined area. October 1, 2021; Produced by the
California Energy Commission; Projection: NAD 1983 (2011) Contiguous USA
Albers; Data: Energy Information Administration (EIA-860) and the Wind
Performance Reporting System (WPRS). For more information, please contact
Rebecca Vail (916)477-0738, or John Hingtgen (916)510-9747.</p>
Utility Wind Project Size by County and State: 2021

<p>This map illustrates the variety of median project capacity
sizes across the United States and California counties for wind projects whose
total nameplate capacity is greater than or equal to 1 MW. The absence of
projects in the southeastern United States is attributable to low average wind
speeds (United States - Annual Average Wind Speed, AWS Truepower and National
Renewable Energy Lab). Hurricane strength winds are not usable with current technology.
Median project capacity is a function of the statewide capacity and the number
of projects within the defined area. August 3, 2022; Produced by the California
Energy Commission; Projection: NAD 1983 (2011) Contiguous USA Albers; Data:
Energy Information Administration (EIA-860) and the Wind Generation Reporting
System (WPRS). For more information, please contact Rebecca Vail (916)477-0738,
or John Hingtgen (916)510-9747.</p>
Utility Natural Gas Capacity and Generation by Jurisdiction and County: 2022

<div>Power plant capacity data and map are from the California Energy Commission. The CEC licenses thermal power plants 50 megawatts (MW) and greater and the infrastructure serving the plants such as electric transmission lines, fuel supply lines, and water pipelines. These licensed plants are referred to as jurisdictional plants. This map depicts the capacity of CEC-licensed (jurisdictional) natural gas power plants and non-jurisdictional natural gas plants. Counties without symbols had no natural gas power plants. Data is from 2022 and is current as of June 23, 2022. Projection: NAD 1983 (2011) California (Teale) Albers (Meters). For more information, contact Gordon Huang at (916) 477-0738 or John Hingtgen at (916) 510-9747.</div>
Utility Solar Generation Regions: 2022

The map depicts Solar Generation Regions of California, which 
are regions with concentrations of operating commercial solar 
plants. The regions were delineated using a k-means method 
that groups the plants into discreet regions based on their 
latitude, longitude and distance to the coast. After facilities 
were grouped, the outermost facilities in each region were 
connected to create the boundaries for each region. To include 
all facilities inside each polygon, a 5 km cartographic buffer was 
used. Plants that are farther from a concentration of other 
plants are not included. Areas outside California included in the 
regions are the result of the mapping process and do not 
represent solar generation facilities. Based on the Quarterly 
Fuel and Energy Report dataset, this map focuses on plants of 
commercial scale (at least 1 MW capacity). 
For more information please contact John Hingtgen at 
john.hingtgen@energy.ca .gov. October 2022
Red Bluff Diversion Dam Historical Monitoring Database

The dataset contains an assortment of Excel analysis files and a Access database of fish information and trapping data from the fish ladder trap for years 1977 to 2008.  Data was used to generate escapement counts for all runs of salmon and steelhead and has data on other species passing the Dam.

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000193. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
Historical Screw Trap Monitoring of Red Bluff Fisheries - Mill and Deer Creeks, Tehama County

This database contains data on screw trapping results for monitoring conducted in Mill and Deer Creeks by Red Bluff CDFW project staff to investigate juvenile salmonid and other encountered species.  Database includes dates, locations, flow, times, fish species, counts, brood year, fork length, weight, health code, and trout smolt stage.

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000195. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
Historical Electrofishing Monitoring Red Bluff Fisheries - Antelope, Mill and Deer Creeks

This database contains data on e-fishing results for monitoring conducted in various streams (primarily Antelope, Mill and Deer Creeks) by Red Bluff CDFW staff to investigate juvenile salmonid and other encountered species.  Database includes dates, locations, shocker settings, times, fish species, counts, fork length, weight, health code, and trout smolt stage.

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000196. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
Freshwater Tidal Wetland Fish Monitoring Project - Decker Island, Sacramento River, Solano County

Fish monitoirng in a newly created freshwater tidal wetland on Decker Island. The dataset includes beach seine and electrofishing fish catch and fork length data collected primarily from early spring through the fall. Fyke traps were used a couple of times experimentally. The project was required per conditions in a USACE 404 permit and USFWS and NMFS biological opinions.

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000385. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
Fish Entrainment Monitoring - Spring Head of Old River, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta

Fish entrainment monitoring at the Spring Head of Old River Barrier, in the south Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This project worked closely with the Vernalis Adaptative Management Plan (VAMP) studies. Fish data was collected using fyke nets attached to culverts in years that the barrier was installed and Kodiak Trawls in years with no barrier. Dataset also includes limited fish sampling using various methods prior to VAMP. Dataset spans 1992-2007.

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000386. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
Vertical Distribution of Larval Delta Smelt and Striped Bass - Lower San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers

Larval fishes were collected using three conical plankton nets fished simultaneously on the lower San Joaquin and Sacramento rivers, in 2000 and 2001. Dataset includes larval fish catch and length data, and water temperature and conductivity data. The study was designed to target larval Delta Smelt to address questions regarding their vertical distribution in the water column as related to tidal stage and diel period.

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000387. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
National Highway System

<div style='text-align:Left;'><p>The National Highway System consists of a network of roads important to the economy, defense and mobility. On October 1, 2012 the existing National Highway System (NHS) was expanded to include all existing Principal Arterials (i.e. Functional Classifications 1, 2 and 3) to the new Enhanced NHS. </p><p>Under MAP-21, the Enhanced NHS is composed of rural and urban roads nationwide serving major population centers, international border crossings, intermodal transportation facilities, and major travel destinations.The NHS includes:<br /></p><p><span></span></p><p><span>The Interstate System. </span></p><p><span></span></p><p><ul><li><span>Other Principal arterials and border crossings on those routes (including other urban and rural principal arterial routes, and border crossings on those routes, that were not included on the NHS before the date of enactment of the MAP-21).</span></li><li><span>Intermodal connectors -- highways that provide motor vehicle access between the NHS and major intermodal transportation facilities. </span></li><li><span>STRAHNET -- the network of highways important to U.S. strategic defense. </span></li><li><span>STRAHNET connectors to major military installations.</span></li></ul></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p><p><span></span></p></div>
Beach Width Monitoring - Bolsa Chica State Beach-Huntington Beach

Beach Width Monitoring Bolsa Chica State Beach-Huntington Beach region 5 records the monthly beach width of Bolsa Chica State Beach and Huntington Beach in order to document any trends of erosion that may be caused by the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve Inlet.

The entire width of the beach is measured monthly at 10 chosen locations on both sides of BCER inlet at a high tide of 5 ft. ,or as close to 5 ft. as possible, using a stake in the ground and a 100m measuring tape. Along with the width of the beach the exact time and tide height at the collection time is also recorded. 

This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000414. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.
Oak Fire Structure Status Map

<font color='#666666' face='Lato, sans-serif'><span style='font-size:16px;'>This map feeds into a web app that allows a user to examine the known status of structures damaged by the wildfire. If a structure point does not appear on the map it may still have been impacted by the fire. Specific addresses can be searched for in the search bar. Use the imagery and topographic basemaps and photos to positively identify a structure. Photos may only be available for damaged and destroyed structures.</span></font><div style='font-size:16px; color:rgb(102, 102, 102); font-family:Lato, sans-serif;'><br /></div><div style='font-size:16px; color:rgb(102, 102, 102); font-family:Lato, sans-serif;'>For more information about the wildfire response efforts, visit the CAL FIRE <a href='https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>incident page</a>.</div>