Agricultural, domestic, and ecological vulnerability of California's Central Coast to projected changes in land-use, water sustainability, and climate by 2061 under five scenarios

This data release provides 270-m resolution maps of hotspots of vulnerability to projected changes in land-use, water shortages, and climate from 2001-2061 for agricultural, domestic, and ecological communities in the Central Coast of California, USA, under five management scenarios. This data covers the counties of Santa Cruz, San Benito, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara counties, but only cover those areas overlying a groundwater basin (because these contain the overwhelming majority of regional anthropogenic land-uses). Data are provided as .zip compressed file packages containing geospatial raster surfaces (.tif format). Each map is the product of one of three types of exposure to change (land, water, or climate) and one of three types of sensitivity to that change (agricultural, domestic, ecological). The resulting vulnerability measures map hotspots of nine vulnerabilities, plus a tenth map that is the sum of all nine measures to identify hotspots of overall vulnerability. 
See Van Schmidt et al. (2023) in Ecology &amp; Society (doi: TBD) for full methodological details. Briefly, exposure to future land-use change and water shortages were jointly forecast from 2001 to 2061 with the Land Use and Carbon + Water Simulator (LUCAS-W) based on historical empirical rates. Exposure to climate change was calculated from five model-averaged RCP 8.5 forecasts of the Basin Characterization Model (BCM), which estimated  change in runoff as surface water, potential recharge to groundwater aquifers, and climatic water deficit (CWD), among other variables. Lastly, sensitivity for communities was obtained from diverse datasets including LUCAS-W cropland projections, crop water demand data, farmland importance rankings, 2017 census data, range maps for imperiled species and subspecies, and wildlife agency reports. Sensitivity and exposure layers were rescaled 0-1 to allow for comparison, and the final vulnerability measures therefore have a possible range from 0 (no vulnerability) up to a maximum of 1 (maximum exposure and maximum sensitivity). The nine measures are as follows:
(1) Land-Agricultural: Loss of important farmland; 
(2) Land-Domestic: Lack of new development in areas with housing needs;  
(3) Land-Ecological: Loss of critical habitats for endangered species; 
(4) Water-Agricultural: Increased water demand that cannot be fallowed (orchards/vineyards); 
(5) Water-Domestic: Household vulnerability to increased water inaffordability; 
(6) Water-Ecological: Drying of groundwater-dependent habitats for endangered species; 
(7) Climate-Agricultural: Increased irrigation water needs of crops; 
(8) Climate-Domestic: Household vulnerability to heat-related health impacts; 
(9) Climate-Ecological: Loss of runoff &amp; recharge that keeps streams, ponds, and vernal pools wet.
Each .zip file is a compressed file package containing maps of each measure under five scenarios, which have different sets of management assumptions along two axes, Water management Low/Moderate/High intensity and Land use management Low/Moderate/High intensity:
- MM (Moderate / Moderate management intensity): a scenario where water demand caps under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) reduce development in overdrafted groundwater basins based on current total water supplies, and where prime farmland and groundwater recharge areas will be protected from urban sprawl (i.e., land use projections assuming development stabilizes at a level sustainable with current water supplies, and urban sprawl limits). The other four scenarios differ from the MM scenario by altering one of these management strategies, while keeping the second strategy at the "Moderate" level.
-- WL (Water management Low intensity): a pre-SGMA "business-as-usual" scenario where water demand is uncoupled from land-use change and does not need to stabilize at sustainable levels.
-- WH (Water management High intensity): a scenario that assumes that water demand caps, but with increased caps due to enhanced water supplies proposed under local groundwater agencies' Groundwater Sustainability Plans.
-- LL (Land use management Low intensity): a scenario where prime farmland and groundwater recharge areas are not protected from urban sprawl.
-- LH (Land use management High intensity): a scenario where almost all the state's priority habitats are preserved from urbanization or agricultural expansion.

Tags: biota, california, california-central-coast, groundwater, land-cover, land-use, land-use-change, monterey-county, san-benito-county, san-luis-obispo-county, santa-barbara-county, santa-cruz-county, scenarios, united-states, usgs-6470ce9fd34e4e58932d21c9, water-demand, water-supply, water-sustainability
Organization: Department of the Interior