AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
BLM OR LWC Historical Inventory Polygon Hub

LWC_INVNTRY_HIST_POLY: This feature dataset represents the spatial extent and boundaries of historical inventoried and managed BLM Lands with Wilderness Characteristics. This dataset also also provides BLM and the public with historical information about naturalness, opportunities for solitude and/or primitive recreation, supplemental values and proximity to Wilderness Areas or Wilderness Study Areas.

BLM Inventoried Lands with Wilderness Characteristics is consistent with Section 201 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), which requires the BLM Colorado Inventoried Lands with Wilderness Characteristics is consistent with Section 201 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), which requires the Secretary of the Interior to “prepare and maintain on a continuing basis an inventory of all public lands and their resource and other values,” and the BLM Land Use Planning Handbook, BLM Colorado has identified and begun an assessment of BLM-managed lands with wilderness characteristics outside of existing WSAs. BLM Manual 6310 - Conducting Wilderness Characteristics Inventory on BLM Lands, provides the guidance from which BLM performs the wilderness characteristic inventory process.

Tags: biota, environment, geospatial, lwc, management, oregon, washington, wilderness, wilderness-characteristics
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM UT Travel Management Areas (Polygon)

<div style='text-align:left;'><p><font size='3'>The layers within this feature service represent the spatial extent and boundaries of BLM Utah Travel Management Areas and Plans (TMAP) Travel Management Area (TMA) polygons. TMA polygons are used for planning purposes only and can exist without a Travel Management Plan (TMP) or Resource Management Plan (RMP). Data within these services are a live copy of BLM Utah's enterprise production environment. Quality control is conducted annually.</font></p><p><font size='3'>Complete metadata for these data sets can be found at:<br /></font></p><p></p><ul><li><a href='https://gis.blm.gov/utarcgis/rest/services/Transportation/BLM_UT_TMA/FeatureServer/0/metadata' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><font color='#4169e1' size='3'><u>BLM UT Travel Management Areas (Polygon)</u></font></a><br /></li></ul><p></p></div>

Tags: authorization, blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, geospatial, management, planningcadastre, polygon, recreation, transportation, travel, ut, utah
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM Natl Wild Horse and Burro Herd Mgmt Area Polygons

Feature Class for BLM Wild Horse and Burro Herd Areas.

Herd Areas were designated in 1971 as places where wild horses and/or burros were found during the initial flights in 1971.  Federal lands identified in 1971 but not managed for wild horses and burros are called Herd Areas.  As additional surveys were done and data gathered, it was determined that some of these lands were privately owned or otherwise not suitable for long-term management of wild horses and/or burros.  Areas with private animals that were claimed during the claiming period were not carried forward as Herd Areas.  Herd Areas were carried forward in land use plans and determinations were made as to whether or not to manage animals on these federal lands.  

Federal lands identified in 1971 but managed for wild horses and burros are called Herd Management Areas.  In Herd Management Areas, specific laws and regulations pertaining to the management of wild horses and burros are applied.  The Bureau uses the term Herd Management Area; the Forest Service uses the term Wild Horse Territory.  All Herd Management Areas need to be contained within an originally designated Herd Area.  Management status can change based on changing conditions.

The BLM Historical Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Area polygon feature class remains empty until a change occurs to any of the BLM Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Area polygons.  When changes occur to a BLM Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Area polygon, the original herd management area is moved to this historical polygon feature class.  The resulting polygons are no longer active and are stored in this feature class for historical reference.

The BLM Historical Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Area features are a result of the BLM Wild Horse and Burro Herd Management Area polygons being permanently changed as a result of a business need.

Tags: alaska, arizona, authorization, blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, burro, california, colorado, economy, geospatial, herd, historical, horse, idaho, management, montana, nevada, new-mexico, oregon, planningcadastre, range, utah, wild, wildlife, wyoming
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM AK Land Use Authorizations

The land use authorization dataset includes the following authorization types: communication sites, facility/site, fiber optics/telephone, lease/permit, pipeline, power transmission, railroad, recreation and public purpose, road, water, and wind/solar.

Tags: alaska, authorization, boundaries, communication-site, communication-sites, easement, energy, facility, facility-site, fiber-optics-telephone, geospatial, land-use, lease, lua, management, permit, pipeline, planningcadastre, power-transmission, railroad, realty, recreation, recreation-and-public-purpose, rights-of-way, road, row, water, wind-solar, withdrawal
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM Natl MLRS Non-Energy Leasables

This dataset contains non-energy leasable cases derived from Legal Land Descriptions (LLD) contained in the US Bureau of Land Management's, BLM, Mineral and Land Record System(MLRS) and geocoded (mapped) using the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) derived from the most accurate survey data available through BLM Cadastral Survey workforce. Geospatial representations might be missing for some cases that can not be geocoded using the MLRS algorithm. This data set contains cases with the dispositions of 'Authorized', 'Pending','Closed', and 'Interim'.<div> </div><div>Each case is given a data quality score based on how well it mapped.  These can be lumped into seven groups to provide a simplified way to understand the scores. </div><div><ul><li>Group 1: Direct PLSS Match. Scores “0”, “1”, “2”, “3” should all have a match to the PLSS data. There are slight differences, but the primary expectation is that these match the PLSS. </li><li>Group 2: Calculated PLSS Match. Scores “4”, “4.1”, “5”, “6”, “7” and “8” were generated through a process of creating the geometry that is not a direct capture from the PLSS. They represent a best guess based on the underlining PLSS </li><li>Group 3 – Mapped to Section. Score of “8.1”, “8.2”, “8.3”, “9” and “10” are mapped to the Section for various reasons (refer to log information in data quality field). </li><li>Group 4- Combination of mapped and unmapped areas. Score of 15 represents a case that has some portions that would map and others that do not. </li><li>Group 5 – No NLSDB Geometry, Only Attributes. Scores “11”, “12”, “20”, “21” and “22” do not have a match to the PLSS and no geometry is in the NLSDB, and only attributes exist in the data. </li><li>Group 6 – Mapped to County. Scores of “25” map to the County. </li><li>Group 7 – Improved Geometry. Scores of “100” are cases that have had their geometry edited by BLM staff using ArcGIS Pro or MLRS bulk upload tool.</li></ul></div>

Tags: alabama, alaska, arizona, arkansas, authorization, boundaries, california, colorado, connecticut, delaware, district-of-columbia, eastern-states, energy, florida, geology, georgia, geoscientificinformation, geospatial, idaho, illinois, indiana, iowa, kansas, kentucky, land-grid, lease, louisiana, maine, management, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, mining, minnesota, mississippi, missouri, montana, nebraska, nevada, new-hampshire, new-jersey, new-mexico, new-york, north-carolina, north-dakota, ohio, oklahoma, oregon, pennsylvania, permit, planningcadastre, plss, public-land-survey-system, rhode-island, section, south-carolina, south-dakota, tennessee, texas, township, utah, vermont, virginia, washington, west-virginia, wisconsin, wyoming
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM OR Monitoring and Sample Point Hub

SAMPLE_PT: This dataset represents monitoring and sample locations (points). Monitoring is a generic term describing various kinds of assessments that the BLM makes on public land natural resources and/or management actions undertaken. The SAMPLE_PT dataset represents places where a measurement of some type has occurred. Examples of measurement types are: vegetation transects or plots, soil pit descriptions, and observations/photos of resource use or impact. For full documentation see SAMPLE POINTS SPATIAL DATA STANDARD. http://www.blm.gov/or/efoia/fy2012/im/p/im-or-2012-051.pdf

Tags: biota, environment, geospatial, management, monitoring, monitoring-points, oregon, sample-points, samples, vegetation, washington
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM ES FA Natl Landscape Conservation Systems NMs and NCAs

This polygon feature class represents the spatial extent and boundaries of the BLM National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS) National Monuments, National Conservation Areas and Similar Designations. This boundary polygon feature depicts the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Eastern States (ES) National Monuments. As of April 2020 BLM ES is home to one Outstanding Natural Area, Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse Outstanding Natural Area in Jupiter, Florida.

Tags: anthropology, blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, eastern-states, endangered, environment, es, facility, fl, florida, geology, geoscientificinformation, geospatial, jurisdiction, location, management, national-conservation-areas, national-monuments, paleontology, planningcadastre, public-lands, recreation, structure, vegetation, wildlife, withdrawal
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM NV NLCS Nevada Wilderness Study Areas Polygons

This polygon feature class represents the spatial extent and boundaries of the BLM National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS) Wilderness Study Areas within the BLM Administrative State of Nevada.

Tags: biota, blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, environment, fire, forest, geoscientificinformation, geospatial, hydrology, inlandwaters, jurisdiction, location, management, nevada, planningcadastre, public-lands, recreation, united-states, western-states, wilderness, wildlife, withdrawal
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM UT Administrative Unit Boundary (Polygon)

<font color='#000000'><font size='3'>BLM Administrative Units to include Utah Field Office and District boundaries at 1:24,000 scale as instructed by the BLM Headquarters Office. Data within these services are a live copy of BLM Utah's enterprise production environment. Quality control is conducted annually.</font></font><div><font color='#000000' size='3'><br /></font></div><div><font size='3'><font color='#000000'>Complete metadata for these data sets can be found at:</font><br /></font></div><div><ul><li><a href='https://gis.blm.gov/utarcgis/rest/services/AdminBoundaries/BLM_UT_ADMU/FeatureServer/1/metadata?format=fgdc' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>BLM UT Administrative Unit Office (Point)</a><br /></li><li><a href='https://gis.blm.gov/utarcgis/rest/services/AdminBoundaries/BLM_UT_ADMU/FeatureServer/0/metadata?format=fgdc' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>BLM UT Administrative Unit Boundary (Polygon)</a><br /></li></ul></div>

Tags: boundaries, geospatial, management, planningcadastre, primarydata, ut, utah
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM Colorado Wild Horse and Burro Herd Areas

This feature class represents the spatial extent and boundaries for Wild Horse and Burro Herd Areas in BLM Colorado. The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act of 1971 designated BLM's Herd Areas. These areas were designated in 1971 as the result of wild horses and/or burros being found during initial flights of them that same year. As additional surveys were done and data gathered, it was determined that some of these animals were actually on private lands and/or were private animals. These areas were not carried forward as Herd Areas. Through land-use planning, BLM evaluates each Herd Area to determine if adequate food, water, cover and space are available to sustain healthy wild horse and burro populations. When a Herd Area meets these criteria, it is designated as a Herd Management Area (HMA). HMA boundaries are available in a separate dataset.

Tags: blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, burro, colorado, department-of-the-interior, doi, geospatial, herd-area, horse, management, range, whb, wild-horse-and-burro
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM CO PLSS Intersected Survey Grid

The fully intersected data is the atomic level of the PLSS that is similar to the coverage or the smallest pieces used to build the PLSS. Polygons may overlap in this feature class. This dataset represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular surveys. The primary source for the data is cadastral survey records housed by the BLM supplemented with local records and geographic control coordinates from states, counties as well as other federal agencies such as the USGS and USFS. The data has been converted from source documents to digital form and transferred into a GIS format that is compliant with FGDC Cadastral Data Content Standards and Guidelines for publication.

Tags: blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, cadastral, colorado, department-of-the-interior, doi, geospatial, intersected, location, management, planningcadastre, plss, public-land-survey-system
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM UT Administrative Unit Office (Point)

<font color='#000000'><font size='3'>BLM Administrative Units to include Utah Field Office and District boundaries at 1:24,000 scale as instructed by the BLM Headquarters Office. Data within these services are a live copy of BLM Utah's enterprise production environment. Quality control is conducted annually.</font></font><div><font color='#000000' size='3'><br /></font></div><div><font size='3'><font color='#000000'>Complete metadata for these data sets can be found at:</font><br /></font></div><div><ul><li><a href='https://gis.blm.gov/utarcgis/rest/services/AdminBoundaries/BLM_UT_ADMU/FeatureServer/1/metadata?format=fgdc' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>BLM UT Administrative Unit Office (Point)</a><br /></li><li><a href='https://gis.blm.gov/utarcgis/rest/services/AdminBoundaries/BLM_UT_ADMU/FeatureServer/0/metadata?format=fgdc' target='_blank' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'>BLM UT Administrative Unit Boundary (Polygon)</a><br /></li></ul></div>

Tags: boundaries, geospatial, management, planningcadastre, primarydata, ut, utah
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM CO Areas of Critical Environmental Concern

Once a polygon feature leaves the Pre-designated phase (transitions from Considered to Designated), that polygon will be removed from the ACEC Pre-designated feature class and be placed in the ACEC Designated feature class. This data set consist of digital data describing (ACEC) Areas of Critical and Environmental Concern for Public Lands in the State of Colorado. ACECs are designated by decisions made during BLM Resource Management Planning. Existing ACECs have a Resouce value tied to them. An example of these resources would be: Threatened and Endangered Plants. Other areas of concern have also been captured within this theme. When the users opens up the attribute table for this theme the user will notice ACEC follows most of names for each area. Some BLM field offices also included Research Natural Areas (RNAs) and Outstanding Natural Areas (ONAs) with in their layer. The data set was compiled from the most current data collected from the BLM Colorado Field Offices. In some cases data boundaries were snapped to BLMs Geographic Coordinate Data Base (GCDB). The GCDB is a statewide survey grid that BLM bases land boundaries on. Also in some cases within the ACECs outer boundary land holdings other than BLM have been cut out to show these Land Patterns, In other cases it has not. It is suggeted that the user of this data also download BLMs most current Surface Management Agency to compare and contrast land holdings within each ACEC.

Tags: acec, areas-of-critical-and-environmental-concern, boundaries, colorado, environment, geospatial, management, planning, planningcadastre
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM OR Fire Poly Hub

FIRE_POLY: Fire History polygons represent the final mapped wildfire perimeter of all BLM fires 10 acres or larger across Oregon and Washington. In addition, wildfires smaller than 10 acres may be included along with many other non-BLM Federal and State agencies wildfires.

Tags: environment, fire, fire-history, geospatial, management, oregon, perimeter, us-forest-service, usfs, washington, wildfire
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM NM REGION CadNSDI MEANDERED WATER FOR KS

This data represents the GIS Version of the Public Land Survey System including both rectangular and non-rectangular survey data. The rectangular survey data are a reference system for land tenure based upon meridian, township/range, section, section subdivision and government lots. The non-rectangular survey data represent surveys that were largely performed to protect and/or convey title on specific parcels of land such as mineral surveys and tracts. The data are largely complete in reference to the rectangular survey data at the level of first division. However, the data varies in terms of granularity of its spatial representation as well as its content below the first division. Therefore, depending upon the data source and steward, accurate subdivision of the rectangular data may not be available below the first division and the non-rectangular minerals surveys may not be present. At times, the complexity of surveys rendered the collection of data cost prohibitive such as in areas characterized by numerous, overlapping mineral surveys. In these situations, the data were often not abstracted or were only partially abstracted and incorporated into the data set. These PLSS data were compiled from a broad spectrum or sources including federal, county, and private survey records such as field notes and plats as well as map sources such as USGS 7 ½ minute quadrangles. The metadata in each data set describes the production methods for the data content. This data is optimized for data publication and sharing rather than for specific "production" or operation and maintenance. A complete PLSS data set includes the following: PLSS Townships, First Divisions and Second Divisions (the hierarchical break down of the PLSS Rectangular surveys) PLSS Special surveys (non-rectangular components of the PLSS) Meandered Water, Corners, Metadata at a Glance (which identified last revised date and data steward) and Conflicted Areas (known areas of gaps or overlaps or inconsistencies). The Entity-Attribute section of this metadata describes these components in greater detail. These are areas of water that are defined from meander lines of the PLSS and GLO surveys. These are not the official representations of coast or water lines and are representations of the lines marked by the survey along the boundaries of meandered water at the time of survey.

Tags: management, new-mexico, planningcadastre
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM OR Withdrawals Polygon Hub

WLDS_PUB_POLY: This theme represents the polygons for withdrawals on lands in Oregon and Washington. The WDLS dataset represents spatial location, boundaries, and basic information about withdrawal cases. Withdrawals are formal actions that set aside, withhold, or reserve federal lands by statute or administrative order for public purposes. Non-Federal lands can be included within the boundaries of a withdrawal. If title to these non-Federal lands is subsequently acquired by the United States, the lands will be subject to the terms and conditions of the withdrawal.

Tags: boundaries, geospatial, management, oregon, planningcadastre, washington, withdrawal
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM CO Administrative Units

This data set consists of digital data describing BLM Colorado's Administrative Unit Boundaries in the State of Colorado, also known as BLM Colorado Field Office Areas. This data set was derived from BLM Colorado Field Office data captured at a scale of 1:24,000 and joined into a resulting statewide map layer. Differences in data capture techniques resulted in the data editor dropping some boundaries from various Field Office Areas to avoid sliver problems. The data was snapped to the 2016 Geographic Coordinate Data Base (GCDB) for boundary consistency

Tags: admu, blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, colorado, department-of-the-interior, doi, field-office, geospatial, management
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM NM Wilderness Study Areas

This polygon feature class represents the spatial extent and boundaries of the BLM National Landscape Conservation System (NLCS) Wilderness Study Areas.

Tags: 002, 003, 007, 008, 012, 013, 015, authorizations, biota, blm, boundaries, bureau-of-land-management, environment, forest, geoscientificinformation, geospatial, hydrology, inlandwaters, jurisdiction, location, management, new-mexico, planningcadastre, public-lands, recreation, united-states, western-states, wilderness, wildlife, withdrawal
Organization: Department of the Interior
BLM CA DRECP ACEC Polygons

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared this Record of Decision (ROD) approving the Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) for the California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) Plan and Bishop and Bakersfield Resource Management Plans (RMPs). The BLM also explains in this ROD the identification of the California Desert National Conservation Lands as discussed in the attached LUPA. The LUPA was prepared as part of the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP). The DRECP has been developed as an interagency plan by the BLM, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Energy Commission (CEC), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) (collectively “REAT Agencies”; Renewable Energy Action Team [REAT]) to (1) advance federal and state natural resource conservation goals and other federal land management goals; (2) meet the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), California Endangered Species Act (CESA), Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (NCCPA), and Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA); and (3) facilitate the timely and streamlined permitting of renewable energy projects, all in the Mojave and Colorado/Sonoran desert regions of Southern California.

The complete ROD can be found on ePlanning at https://eplanning.blm.gov/public_projects/lup/66459/133460/163124/DRECP_BLM_LUPA_ROD.pdf

Tags: acec, administrative-boundaries, boundaries, california, california-desert-district, central-california-district, conservation, drecp, energy, erma, management, mojave, planningcadastre, renewable-energy, srma, united-states, western-states, wildlife, withdrawal
Organization: Department of the Interior