AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
CCDF State and Territory Funding Allocations

Child Care Development Fund allocation information for states and US territories by year. State allocations are based on the following statistics: Population under 5 and under 13 from the Census Bureau; Free and Reduced Price School Lunch Program participation from the Department of Agriculture; and Per Capita Income from the Department of Commerce.

<b>Units of Response: </b>States

<b>Type of Data: </b>Financial

<b>Tribal Data: </b>No

<b>Periodicity: </b>Annual

<b>Demographic Indicators: </b>Unavailable

<b>SORN: </b>Not Applicable

<b>Data Use Agreement: </b>Not Applicable

<b>Data Use Agreement Location: </b>Not Applicable

<b>Granularity: </b>Tribe

<b>Spatial: </b>Tribes

<b>Geocoding: </b>Tribe

Tags: child-care
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Child Care Market Rate Survey Project: Mail Survey of Oregon Facilities, 2006

States are required by the CCDF Final Rule to ensure that families receiving child care assistance have equal access to comparable care purchased by private-paying parents. A market rate survey (MRS) is a tool States use to achieve this program objective. Some States conduct surveys to collect the child care market rate and others use administrative data, such as data collected by child care resource and referral (CCR&R) and State licensing agencies, to analyze the market rate for child care.

This survey was one strategy used to collect child care market price data. Comparing findings garnered from different methods allows one to evaluate whether different data collection methods produce different price findings (convergent validity) and how well these data collection methods represent the child care market (criterion-related validity). These data can also be used to explore several validity issues of concern with market price studies.

<b>Units of Response: </b>Program

<b>Type of Data: </b>Survey

<b>Tribal Data: </b>No

<b>Periodicity: </b>One-time

<b>Demographic Indicators: </b>Not Applicable

<b>SORN: </b>Not Applicable

<b>Data Use Agreement: </b>Yes

<b>Data Use Agreement Location: </b>https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/rpxlogin

<b>Granularity: </b>Childcare Providers;Individual;Program;Region

<b>Spatial: </b>United States

<b>Geocoding: </b>Unavailable

Tags: child-care
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Evaluation of Child Care Subsidy Strategies: Washington Site Public Use Files, 2005

The Evaluation of Child Care Subsidy Strategies is a multi-site, multi-year effort to determine whether and how different child care subsidy policies and procedures and quality improvement efforts help low-income parents obtain and hold onto jobs and improve outcomes for children. Funding from the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) administered by the Child Care Bureau are divided into two purposes. The vast majority are aimed at assisting children of low-income working parents whose eligibility is determined by states within broad federal guidelines, while a much smaller portion (4 percent) work with state matching funds to improve the quality of child care for all children. For this study series, four experiments were conducted, two test alternative subsidy policies for low-income families and two test approaches to the use of set-aside funds for improving child care quality for all children. The four study sites and focus of evaluation include: (1) the effectiveness of three language and literacy curricula on teaching practices and children's language and literacy outcomes (Miami Dade County, Florida); (2) the impact of alternative eligibility and re-determination child care subsidy policies on parental employment outcomes (Illinois); (3) the impact of alternative child care co-payment structures on use of child care subsidies and employment outcomes (Washington) and (4) the effectiveness of training on Learning Games curriculum in changing care-giving practices in family child care homes and children's developmental outcomes (Massachusetts).

<b>Units of Response: </b>Washington state families receiving child care subsidies.

<b>Type of Data: </b>Administrative

<b>Tribal Data: </b>No

<b>Periodicity: </b>One-time

<b>Demographic Indicators: </b>Household Income;Household Size;Race

<b>SORN: </b>https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/09/19/2022-20139/privacy-act-of-1974-system-of-records

<b>Data Use Agreement: </b>Yes

<b>Data Use Agreement Location: </b>https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/29002/datadocumentation

<b>Granularity: </b>Family;Household

<b>Spatial: </b>States

<b>Geocoding: </b>Unavailable

Tags: child-care
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Child Care Market Rate Survey Practices and Policies of States, Territories, and Tribes, 2005-2006

The primary objective of this study was to describe current market rate survey methods, practices, and policies in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, five territories, and the 28 Native American tribes that conduct their own market rate survey. A market rate survey is a tool to collect up-to-date information on what facilities, within given geographic areas, charge parents for various types of child care. A second objective was to identify the validity issues that emerge from this comparison of current market rate survey practices.

Variables are organized under six specific functions representing the market rate survey process. These were: (1) administration/organization of the market rate survey, (2) facility population and sample, (3) data collection, (4) data analysis, (5) dissemination of the results, and (6) rate setting policy.

<b>Units of Response: </b>Program

<b>Type of Data: </b>Survey

<b>Tribal Data: </b>Yes

<b>Periodicity: </b>One-time

<b>Demographic Indicators: </b>Geographic Areas;Military

<b>SORN: </b>Not Applicable

<b>Data Use Agreement: </b>Yes

<b>Data Use Agreement Location: </b>https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/rpxlogin

<b>Granularity: </b>Childcare Providers;Individual;State;Tribe

<b>Spatial: </b>United States

<b>Geocoding: </b>Unavailable

Tags: child-care
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Health and air quality impact factors developed for GCAM-USA using COBRA

Human health and air quality impact factors can be used to endogenize impacts into a human-Earth systems model such as the state-level Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM-USA). The resulting model can then be used to evaluate the monetized health or air quality benefits associated with a technology or policy. Endogenized air pollution impacts can also be constrained, allowing GCAM-USA to identify cost-effective strategies for achieving targeted goals. This package includes R code for developing health impact values ($/ton) and a spreadsheet for translating those factors into damage factors ($/unit activity). Resulting comma-separated-value files that include health damage factors for ozone and particulate matter are also included. 

Tags: air-quality, emissions, energy, health
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Scenario and sensitivity analysis of U.S. soybean oil biodiesel production within the GLOBIOM model

This dataset provides the scenario output data assessed in the following publication:

Understanding Uncertainty in Market-Mediated Responses to US Oilseed Biodiesel Demand: Sensitivity of ILUC Emission Estimates to GLOBIOM Parametric Uncertainty
Neus Escobar, Hugo Valin, Stefan Frank, Diana Galperin, Christopher M. Wade, Leopold Ringwald, Daniel Tanner, Niklas Hinkel, Petr Havlík, Justin S. Baker, Sharyn Lie, and Christopher Ramig
Environmental Science & Technology 2025 59 (1), 302-314
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09944

Data included consist of 
1. outputs for a central baseline scenario and policy shock which mandates an additional 1 billion gallons of soybean oil biodiesel consumption within the USA
2. calculated scenario differences for each trial under a one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis
3. calculated scenario differences for each trial under a Monte-carlo sensitivity analysis
4. calculated results from a Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) analysis. Citation information for this dataset can be found in Data.gov's References section.

Tags: biodiesel, biofuels, economic-model, international-trade, land-use-change, lca
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Fire Whirl data set

Emission factors from large scale fire whirls burning crude oil. Portions of this dataset are inaccessible because: Data created by external organizations. They can be accessed through the following means: Contact the creator of the data, Michael Gollner. Format: Movie data. Velocity data. 

This dataset is associated with the following publication:
Cui, W., J. Dowling, M. Hajilou, M. Huffman, B. Pawar, J. Aurell, Q. Wang, E. Oran, K. Stone, and M. Gollner. Large-Scale Field Experiments on Enhancing In-Situ Burning with Fire Whirls.   FUEL. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam,  NETHERLANDS,  0, (2026).

Tags: emissions, fire-whirl, heat-flux, in-situ-burning, particulate-matter-pm
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA-generated data associated with the manuscript "Health and air pollutant emission impacts of Net Zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the Energy Modeling Forum 37 study"

Data associated with EPA-generated figures in the manuscript "Health and air pollutant emission impacts of Net Zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the Energy Modeling Forum 37 study.". Portions of this dataset are inaccessible because: The Energy Modeling Forum embargos these data for a period after the completion of the exercise. Future public release is expected. They can be accessed through the following means: Modeling outputs generated by the EMF37 modeling teams are included in the EMF37 Scenario Explorer. The data are submitted to the International Institute of Applied Systems Analyses (IIASA) and will eventually be accessible via the EMF37 Scenario Explorer on the IIASA website. (https://data.ece.iiasa.ac.at/). Format: Database of full model results and data underlying non-EPA generated graphics. 

This dataset is associated with the following publication:
Loughlin, D., A. Barron, C. Chettri, A. O'Meara, L. Sarmiento, D. Dong, D.L. McCollum, S. Showalter, R. Beach, J. Bistline, G. Kim, C. Nolte, J. Emmerling, and P. Kaplanakman. Health and air pollutant emission impacts of Net Zero CO2 by 2050 scenarios from the Energy Modeling Forum 37 study.   Energy and Climate Change. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam,  NETHERLANDS, 5: 100165, (2024).

Tags: climate-change, energy, modeling, nitrogen-and-co-pollutants
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2024 IN DNR Lidar DEM: Indiana Coastline

Original Product: These are Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data as part of the required deliverables for the lidar project. Class 2 (Ground) lidar points in conjunction with the hydro breaklines were used to create a 1 ft hydro-flattened Raster DEM.

Original Dataset Geographic Extent: Cook county, Illinois; Lake, LaPorte, and Porter counties, Indiana; and Berrien county, Michigan; covering approximately 120 square miles. 

Original Dataset Description: The lidar project called for the planning, acquisition, processing, and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.35 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base Lidar Specification. The data was developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD83(HARN), Indiana West Feet, and vertical datum of NAVD88 (GEOID18) Feet. Lidar data was delivered as processed Classified LAS 1.4 files, formatted to 2139 individual 1250 ft x 1250 ft tiles clipped to the DPA, as tiled Intensity Images and tiled bare-earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 1250 ft x 1250 ft schema.

Original Dataset Ground Conditions: Lidar was collected in April 2024, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. Sanborn Map Company, Inc. established a total of 25 accuracy check points, 20 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (20 NVA points), 5 in Tall Grass and Brushland/Low Trees categories (5 VVA points), that  were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data.

This dataset was provided to the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) by the Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources to make the data available for bulk and custom downloads from the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer.

Tags: airplane, coastal elevation, coastal processes, continent, dems, digital elevation/terrain model (dem), doc/noaa/nos/ocm, earth science, indiana, land surface, lidar, light detection and ranging, national ocean service, noaa, north america, oceans, office of coastal management, terrain elevation, topography, u.s. department of commerce, united states of america, vertical location
Organization: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce
2024 IN DNR Lidar: Indiana Coastline

Original Product: These lidar data are processed Classified LAS 1.4 files, formatted to 2139 individual 1250 ft x 1250 ft tiles clipped to the DPA; used to create intensity images, 3D breaklines, and hydro-flattened DEMs as necessary.

Original Dataset Geographic Extent: Cook county, Illinois; Lake, LaPorte, and Porter counties, Indiana; and Berrien county, Michigan; covering approximately 120 square miles. 

Original Dataset Description: The lidar project called for the planning, acquisition, processing, and derivative products of lidar data to be collected at a nominal pulse spacing (NPS) of 0.35 meters. Project specifications are based on the U.S. Geological Survey National Geospatial Program Base Lidar Specification. The data was developed based on a horizontal projection/datum of NAD83(HARN), Indiana West Feet, and vertical datum of NAVD88 (GEOID18) Feet. Lidar data was delivered as processed Classified LAS 1.4 files, formatted to 2139 individual 1250 ft x 1250 ft tiles clipped to the DPA, as tiled Intensity Images and tiled bare-earth DEMs; all tiled to the same 1250 ft x 1250 ft schema.

Original Dataset Ground Conditions: Lidar was collected in April 2024, while no snow was on the ground and rivers were at or below normal levels. Sanborn Map Company, Inc. established a total of 25 accuracy check points, 20 in Bare Earth and Urban landcovers (20 NVA points), 5 in Tall Grass and Brushland/Low Trees categories (5 VVA points), that  were used to assess the vertical accuracy of the data.

This dataset was provided to the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (OCM) by the Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources to make the data available for bulk and custom downloads from the NOAA Digital Coast Data Access Viewer.

Tags: airplane, coastal elevation, coastal processes, continent, doc/noaa/nos/ocm, earth science, indiana, land surface, lidar, light detection and ranging, national ocean service, noaa, north america, oceans, office of coastal management, terrain elevation, topography, u.s. department of commerce, united states of america, vertical location
Organization: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce
COVID-19 State Profile Report - Nevada

<b>After over two years of public reporting, the State Profile Report will no longer be produced and distributed after February 2023. The final release was on February 23, 2023. We want to thank everyone who contributed to the design, production, and review of this report and we hope that it provided insight into the data trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data about COVID-19 will continue to be updated at <a href='https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home' >CDC’s COVID Data Tracker</a>.
 </b>

<p>
The State Profile Report (SPR) is generated by the Data Strategy and Execution Workgroup in the Joint Coordination Cell, in collaboration with the White House. It is managed by an interagency team with representatives from multiple agencies and offices (including the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Indian Health Service). The SPR provides easily interpretable information on key indicators for each state, down to the county level.
 </p>

It is a weekly snapshot in time that:
<ul>
<li>Focuses on recent outcomes in the last seven days and changes relative to the month prior</li>
<li>Provides additional contextual information at the county level for each state, and includes national level information</li>
<li>Supports rapid visual interpretation of results with color thresholds</li>
</ul>

Tags: covid-19, covid-19-spr
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
HHS COVID-19 Small Area Estimations Survey - Primary Vaccine Series - Wave 16

The goal of the Monthly Outcome Survey (MOS) Small Area Estimations (SAE) is to generate estimates of the proportions of adults, by county and month, who were in the population of interest for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) We Can Do This COVID-19 Public Education Campaign. These data are designed to be used by practitioners and researchers to understand how county-level COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy changed over time in the United States.

Tags: covid-19, demography, geographic, hhs, maps, primary-series, public-education-campaign, sae-maps, small-area-estimations, statistical-models, u-s-adults, vaccination
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
HHS COVID-19 Monthly Outcome Survey - Wave 27

The Monthly Outcome Survey (MOS) was designed to assess COVID-19 vaccine uptake as well as beliefs, intentions, and behaviors relevant to COVID-19 vaccination at a point in time. The survey fielded on a monthly basis from January 2021 to April 2023. When the MOS first launched, it focused on the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines; in later waves, it was expanded to assess parents’ intentions to get their children vaccinated or boosted and to track booster and updated vaccine uptake and readiness. The MOS fielded as part of an online omnibus survey, conducted with a cross-sectional sample of approximately 5,000 U.S. adults each month.

Tags: adults, age-groups, agency-for-healthcare, covid-19, covid-19-vaccination, covid-19-vaccine-uptake, covid19, dataset, hesitancy, hhs, no-vaccine-intentions, public-education-campaign, research, u-s-adults, vaccination, vaccine-hesitancy, vaccine-readiness, vaccine-ready, vaccine-uptake, wait-and-see
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Child Victims by Age

Numbers and rates of child victims by single year age and by state for the most recent federal fiscal year for which data are available.

To view more National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) findings, click link to summary page below: 
https://healthdata.gov/stories/s/kaeg-w7jc

Tags: child-abuse, child-welfare
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
HHS COVID-19 Small Area Estimations Survey - Primary Vaccine Series - Wave 07

The goal of the Monthly Outcome Survey (MOS) Small Area Estimations (SAE) is to generate estimates of the proportions of adults, by county and month, who were in the population of interest for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) We Can Do This COVID-19 Public Education Campaign. These data are designed to be used by practitioners and researchers to understand how county-level COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy changed over time in the United States.

Tags: covid-19, demography, geographic, hhs, maps, primary-series, public-education-campaign, sae-maps, small-area-estimations, statistical-models, u-s-adults, vaccination
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
COVID-19 Treatments

<b>NOTE: As of 12/17/2024, this dataset is no longer updated. Please use <a href="https://healthdata.gov/ASPR/ASPR-Treatments-Locator/879u-23sm/about_data">ASPR Treatments Locator.</a></b>

This dataset displays pharmacies, clinics, and other locations with safe and effective COVID-19 medications. These medications require a prescription from a healthcare provider. Some locations, known as Test to Treat sites, give you the option to get tested, get assessed by a healthcare provider, and receive treatment – all in one visit. COVID-19 medications may be available at additional locations that are not shown in this dataset.

The locations displayed have either self-attested they have inventory of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir packaged with ritonavir), Lagevrio (molnupiravir), or Veklury (Remdesivir) within at least the last two months and/or reported participation in the Paxlovid Patient Assistance Program. Sites that have not reported in the last two weeks display a notification, "Inventory has not been reported in the last 2 weeks. Please contact the provider to make sure the product is available." Outpatient COVID-19 medications may be available at additional locations not listed on this website.

All therapeutics identified in the locator not approved by the FDA must be used in alignment with the terms of the respective product’s Emergency Use Authorization. Visit COVID-19 Treatments and Therapeutics for more information on all treatment options.

This website identifies sites that have commercially purchased inventory of COVID-19 treatments and, in some cases, may identify sites that have remaining, no-cost U.S. government distributed supply. Some sites may charge for services not covered by insurance. Some sites may offer telehealth services. This website is intended for informational purposes only and does not serve as an endorsement or recommendation for use of any of the locations listed on the sites.

Clarification for DoD Facilities: Those individuals eligible for care in an MTF include Active Duty Service Members (ADSMs), covered beneficiaries enrolled in TRICARE Prime or Select, including TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS), TRICARE Retired Reserve (TRR) and TRICARE Young Adult (TYA) participants, TRICARE for Life beneficiaries, and individuals otherwise entitled by law to MTF care (e.g., regular retired members and their dependents who are not enrolled in TRICARE but who are otherwise eligible for MTF space-available care, certain foreign military members and their families registered in DEERS, and others).

Tags: covid-19, covid-19-therapeutics, lagevrio, molnupiravir, paxlovid, remdesivir, treatments, veklury
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
COVID-19 State Profile Report - Georgia

<b>After over two years of public reporting, the State Profile Report will no longer be produced and distributed after February 2023. The final release was on February 23, 2023. We want to thank everyone who contributed to the design, production, and review of this report and we hope that it provided insight into the data trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data about COVID-19 will continue to be updated at <a href='https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home' >CDC’s COVID Data Tracker</a>.
 </b>

<p>
The State Profile Report (SPR) is generated by the Data Strategy and Execution Workgroup in the Joint Coordination Cell, in collaboration with the White House. It is managed by an interagency team with representatives from multiple agencies and offices (including the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Indian Health Service). The SPR provides easily interpretable information on key indicators for each state, down to the county level.
 </p>

It is a weekly snapshot in time that:
<ul>
<li>Focuses on recent outcomes in the last seven days and changes relative to the month prior</li>
<li>Provides additional contextual information at the county level for each state, and includes national level information</li>
<li>Supports rapid visual interpretation of results with color thresholds</li>
</ul>

Tags: covid-19, covid-19-spr
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services