AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Modeled change in the Seasonality between the modeled 2041-2070 period (CanESM2 r5i1p1 model) and the 1971-2000 Normal period

Originators: US Environmental Protection Agency Publisher: US EPA Office of Research & Development (ORD) - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) Publication place: Corvallis, OR Publication date: Time Period of Data: 1900-2010; Projected data for 2041-2070. Data location: GeoPlatform ("https://www.geoplatform.gov/") and EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (https://edg.epa.gov/). Abstract: We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are not within two-standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the vulnerability index for each metric. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially-uniform as temperature. The highest elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the West are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. Purpose: These data were created in support of the US EPA’s ACE CIVA 2.3, Task Project (QAPP: E-WED-0030854). However, these climate data and hydrologic landscape summaries should have broad applicability for hydrological, geomorphic, or ecological modeling, management, and restoration.  This raster contains the modeled change in the seasonality of the month of maximum surplus precipitation between the target time period and model (in title) and the 1971-2000 Normal period (1 = same season, 0 = earlier season, 2 = later season).

Tags: 020:094, 1900 -2010, 2041-2070, climate, downloadable data, environment, united states, water
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EnviroAtlas - Land Cover in Areas of High Water Accumulation in 2011 for the Conterminous United States

This EnviroAtlas dataset contains Land Cover data by Wetness Index for each Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) 12-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC-12) of the conterminous United States, based on the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) from 2011, the December 30, 2009 Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database, and the USDA's Cropland Data Layer (CDL) data from 2011. The dataset includes the percentages of each HUC-12 belonging to several land cover groups that are on land with a Wetness Index greater than 550 (WET550). This dataset was produced by the US EPA to support research and online mapping activities related to EnviroAtlas. EnviroAtlas (https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas) allows the user to interact with a web-based, easy-to-use, mapping application to view and analyze multiple ecosystem services for the contiguous United States. The dataset is available as downloadable data (https://edg.epa.gov/data/Public/ORD/EnviroAtlas) or as an EnviroAtlas map service. Additional descriptive information about each attribute in this dataset can be found in its associated EnviroAtlas Fact Sheet (https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas/enviroatlas-fact-sheets).

Tags: 12-digit hucs, agriculture, alabama, arizona, arkansas, california, colorado, connecticut, delaware, ecosystem, ecosystem services, enviroatlas, environment, environmental atlas, florida, georgia, green space, idaho, illinois, indiana, iowa, kansas, kentucky, land cover, louisiana, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, mississippi, missouri, montana, nebraska, nevada, new hampshire, new jersey, new mexico, new york, north carolina, north dakota, ohio, oklahoma, oregon, pennsylvania, rhode island, soils, south carolina, south dakota, tennessee, texas, united states, utah, vermont, virginia, washington, washington dc, water, west virginia, wetlands, wisconsin, wyoming
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Hydrologic Landscape Classification of the U.S.

We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. The data in this data set provides the Feddema Moisture Index, classified climate class, and classified season class for each time decade and 30 yr normal period from 1900-2010 and the 10 analyzed climate model projections described in the manuscript below (see Credits).

Tags: 020:094, climate, environment, ground water, map files, natural resources, united states, water
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Shark River (New Jersey) sewage no-discharge zone, 1998, EPA HQ OWOW

This is a No Discharge Area (NDA) for Shark River, NJ. The actual NDA areas/polygons were primarily created using narrative description from Federal Register notices and digitized against basemap data for hydrography and from recent aerial photography.

Tags: 020:078, downloadable data, environment, marine, new jersey, water
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1:6000 Scale (6K) Quadrangles developed by USEPA to Support Reconnaissance, and Tactical and Strategic Planning for Emergency Responses and Homeland Security Events (Region 7 Extract)

Reference quads for emergency response reconnaissance developed for use by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Grid cells are based on densification of the USGS Quarterquad (1:12,000 scale or 12K) grids for the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico and are roughly equivalent to 1:6000 scale (6K) quadrangles approximately 2 miles long on each side. Note: This file is a regional subset that has been extracted from a national file 6K quad file. Each regional extract includes a 20 mile buffer of tiles around each EPA Region. To access the national layer (size is greater than 80MB), go to https://edg.epa.gov/data/Public/OLEM/OLEM-OEM/6kquads_epa.zip.

Tags: disaster, emergency response, homeland security, ia, ks, mo, ne, reference grid, response, spills
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EF ACRES

EF_ACRES is a subset of facilities from FRS_PROGRAM_FACILITY and associated best-available geospatial coordinates. Facility Registry Service (FRS) data are refrehsed daily. The layer shows only points from the 'ACRES' (Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System) program.

Tags: alabama, alaska, american samoa, arizona, arkansas, california, cleanup, colorado, connecticut, conservation, delaware, environment, florida, georgia, hawaii, hazards, health, human, idaho, illinois, indiana, iowa, kansas, kentucky, land, louisiana, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, mississippi, missouri, montana, nebraska, nevada, new hampshire, new jersey, new mexico, new york, north carolina, north dakota, ohio, oklahoma, oregon, pennsylvania, puerto rico, regulatory, response, rhode island, sites, south carolina, south dakota, spills, tennessee, texas, toxics, united states, utah, vermont, virgin islands, virginia, washington, washington dc, waste, west virginia, wisconsin, wyoming
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Chemical Data Release (CDR) Sites, 2012

This layer displays points of submission sites extracted from the 2012 Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) database. The CDR database contains comprehensive use and exposure information on the most widely used chemicals in the United States. This layer is drawn at all scales and was procured for EPA through the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT).

Tags: alabama, alaska, arizona, arkansas, california, colorado, connecticut, contaminant, delaware, exposure, facilities, florida, georgia, hawaii, health, human, idaho, illinois, impact, indiana, iowa, kansas, kentucky, louisiana, maine, maryland, massachusetts, michigan, minnesota, mississippi, missouri, montana, nebraska, nevada, new hampshire, new jersey, new mexico, new york, north carolina, north dakota, ohio, oklahoma, oregon, pennsylvania, pesticides, rhode island, risk, sites, south carolina, south dakota, tennessee, texas, toxics, united states, utah, vermont, virginia, washington, washington dc, west virginia, wisconsin, wyoming
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
High Marsh at St. Jones, DE,Lower Delaware Bay, Intermediate Sea Level Rise Scenario, “Protect Developed Dry Land” model protection scenario, EPA ORD NCEA

This raster GIS dataset contains 5-meter-resolution cells depicting the areas of HIGH marsh gain (value=1), lost (value=-1) and remaining (no change; value=0). High marsh (HM) was defined as the aggregation of irregularly-flooded marsh [SLAMM category 7] and transitional salt marsh [SLAMM category 20]. HM is covered by water only sporadically (once per day or less). Based on SLAMM simulation outputs, we generated the gain and loss map by using the “Raster Calculator” tool under “Spatial Analyst Tools” in ArcGIS software. The methodology consists of the three steps listed below (where we use low marsh [LM] as an example). The same process can be applied to other SLAMM land cover categories. 

1) Open ArcMap, add SLAMM simulation raster outputs (all SLAMM categories) for baseline year and future years. 

2) In Raster Calculator, set the SLAMM code equal to 8 (low marsh = SLAMM category 8) to generate a new raster. Each individual cell in the new raster is assigned a value of “0” or “1”. “1” is low marsh and “0” is any other SLAMM land cover category. Perform this step for both the baseline year and future year.

3) In Raster Calculator, subtract the new raster for the baseline year from the new raster for the future year (formula = new future year raster - new baseline year raster). The calculation generates a new raster, in which each individual cell is assigned a value of “-1”, “0”, or “1”. Based on the calculation, “-1” means low marsh loss in the future (the cell has converted from low marsh to a different SLAMM category), “0” means low marsh is remaining (the cell stays the same), and “1” means low marsh gain in the future (the cell has converted from a different SLAMM category to low marsh). 

Prior SLAMM work has been performed in the Delaware Bay, but our methods differ in that we derive results for specific marsh areas and utilize more recent, higher resolution elevation data (2015 USGS CoNED Topobathy Model: New Jersey and Delaware), the most recent SLR projections, and site-specific accretion data (through 2016). These SLAMM simulations were performed as part of a larger project by the USEPA on frameworks and methods for characterizing relative wetland vulnerabilities. 

Note: additional raster files from this project are available upon request. These include files from low and high SLR scenarios and different model protection scenarios. For more information, contact Jordan West (West.Jordan@epa.gov).

Tags: 020:094, coastal wetland, delaware, downloadable data, ecosystem, environment, estuary, exposure, modeling, natural resources, new jersey, relative vulnerability, sea level rise, united states
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index (multiplied by 1000) between modeled 2041-2070 (INM-CM4 r1i1p1) and the 1971-2000 Normal period.

Originators: US Environmental Protection Agency Publisher: US EPA Office of Research & Development (ORD) - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) Publication place: Corvallis, OR Publication date: Time Period of Data: 1900-2010; Projected data for 2041-2070. Data location: GeoPlatform ("https://www.geoplatform.gov/") and EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (https://edg.epa.gov/). Abstract: We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are not within two-standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the vulnerability index for each metric. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially-uniform as temperature. The highest elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the West are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. Purpose: These data were created in support of the US EPA’s ACE CIVA 2.3, Task Project (QAPP: E-WED-0030854). However, these climate data and hydrologic landscape summaries should have broad applicability for hydrological, geomorphic, or ecological modeling, management, and restoration.  This raster contains the modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index over 2041-2070 (INM-CM4 r1i1p1) and the 1971-2000 Normal period.

Tags: 020:094, 1900 -2010, 2041-2070, climate, downloadable data, environment, united states, water
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Modeled change in the Seasonality between the modeled 2041-2070 (CSIRO-Mk3-6-0 r5i1p1) and the 1971-2000 Normal period

Originators: US Environmental Protection Agency Publisher: US EPA Office of Research & Development (ORD) - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) Publication place: Corvallis, OR Publication date: Time Period of Data: 1900-2010; Projected data for 2041-2070. Data location: GeoPlatform ("https://www.geoplatform.gov/") and EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (https://edg.epa.gov/). Abstract: We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are not within two-standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the vulnerability index for each metric. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially-uniform as temperature. The highest elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the West are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. Purpose: These data were created in support of the US EPA’s ACE CIVA 2.3, Task Project (QAPP: E-WED-0030854). However, these climate data and hydrologic landscape summaries should have broad applicability for hydrological, geomorphic, or ecological modeling, management, and restoration.  This raster contains the modeled change in the seasonality of the month of maximum surplus precipitation between the target modeled time period (in title) and the 1971-2000 Normal period (1 = same season, 0 = earlier season, 2 = later season).

Tags: 020:094, 1900 -2010, 2041-2070, climate, downloadable data, environment, united states, water
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Tribal UST and LUST Data

Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended by the Hazardous Waste Disposal Act of 1984, brought underground storage tanks (USTs) under federal regulation. EPA implements the underground storage tank (UST) program in Indian country, providing support to tribal governments to prevent and clean up petroleum releases from USTs. The UST program in Indian country includes marketers and nonretail facilities that have USTs. Marketers include retail facilities such as gas stations and convenience stores that sell petroleum products. Non-retail facilities include those that do not sell petroleum products, but may rely on their own supply of gasoline or diesel for taxis, buses, limousines, trucks, vans, boats, heavy equipment, or a wide range of other vehicles. Of the more than 560 federally recognized tribes about 200 have federally-regulated underground storage tanks on their lands. Of those 200 tribes, over half have 10 or fewer active underground storage tanks. About 20 tribes have 30 or more underground storage tanks. Data on sites managed by this program is assembled by the EPA Regional Offices and varies from region to region in scope and content. Not all regions include Indian Nations. Publicly available data is limited to Excel spreadsheets, but regional contacts are also available to answer questions about the data. Data is updated in May and November of each year.

Tags: diesel, environment, gasoline, indian country, leaking underground storage tank, lust, rcra, tribal, tribe, underground storage tank, united states, ust
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index (multiplied by 1000) between the modeled 2041-2070 period (MRI-CGCM3 r1i1p1 model) and the 1971-2000 Normal period.

Originators: US Environmental Protection Agency Publisher: US EPA Office of Research &amp; Development (ORD) - National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) Publication place: Corvallis, OR Publication date: Time Period of Data: 1900-2010; Projected data for 2041-2070. Data location: GeoPlatform ("https://www.geoplatform.gov/") and EPA Environmental Dataset Gateway (https://edg.epa.gov/). Abstract: We apply the hydrologic landscapes (HL) concept to assess the hydrologic vulnerability of the western United States (U.S.) to projected climate conditions. Our goal is to understand the potential impacts for stakeholder-defined interests across large geographic areas. The basic assumption of the HL approach is that catchments that share similar physical and climatic characteristics are expected to have similar hydrologic characteristics. We map climate vulnerability by integrating the HL approach into a retrospective analysis of historical data to assess variability in future climate projections and hydrology, which includes temperature, precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, snow accumulation, climatic moisture, surplus water, and seasonality of water surplus. Projections that are not within two-standard deviations of the historical decadal average contribute to the vulnerability index for each metric. The resulting vulnerability maps show that temperature and potential evapotranspiration are consistently projected to have high vulnerability indices for the western U.S. Precipitation vulnerability is not as spatially-uniform as temperature. The highest elevation areas with snow are projected to experience significant changes in snow accumulation. The seasonality vulnerability map shows that specific mountainous areas in the West are most prone to changes in seasonality, whereas many transitional terrains are moderately susceptible. This paper illustrates how the HL approach can help assess climatic and hydrologic vulnerability across large spatial scales. By combining the HL concept and climate vulnerability analyses, we provide a planning approach that could allow resource managers to consider how future climate conditions may impact important economic and conservation resources. Purpose: These data were created in support of the US EPA’s ACE CIVA 2.3, Task Project (QAPP: E-WED-0030854). However, these climate data and hydrologic landscape summaries should have broad applicability for hydrological, geomorphic, or ecological modeling, management, and restoration. This raster contains the modeled change in the average Feddema Moisture Index between the 2041-2070 modeled data (specified in the title) relative to the 1971-2000 Normal period.

Tags: 020:094, arizona, california, climate, downloadable data, environment, ground water, idaho, natural resources, nevada, oregon, washington, water
Organization: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency