AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Utility Wind Project Size by County and State: 2022

<div>This map illustrates the variety of median plant capacity sizes across the United States and California counties for wind plants whose total nameplate capacity is greater than or equal to 1 MW. The absence of plants in the southeastern United States and California is attributable to low average wind speeds (United States - Annual Average Wind Speed, AWS Truepower and National Renewable Energy Lab). Hurricane strength winds are not usable with current technology. Median plant capacity is a function of the statewide capacity and the number of plants within the defined area.</div>

Tags: california-energy-commission, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, ead, pdf
Organization: State of California
Mule Deer Habitat Model for NSNF Connectivity - CDFW [ds1047]

The Maxent modeling algorithm was used to build the species distribution model at 270 m spatial resolution using species occurrence points and environmental layers as predictors (Phillips et al. 2006). Species occurrence points were primarily obtained from CNDDB (California Natural Diversity Database) and other CDFW sources, GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), PRBO (Point Blue Conservation Science) and Arctos museum databases. Vegetation, distance to water, elevation, and bioclimatic variables (Franklin et al. 2013) were used as predictor variables. The models were run at 270 m spatial resolution with five replications using cross-validation as a method of sample evaluation. Cross-validation involved the partitioning of the sample data into n subsets, fitting the models to n-1subsets, and testing the model on the one subset not used in fitting the model. Initial model runs showed that our models converged around 2,000 iterations and for this reason we ran all models with 2,500 maximum iterations. Maxent was implemented in R using the ‘dismo''package (Hijmans et al. 2011). Model evaluation was carried out using the ‘PresenceAbsence''package in R (Freeman and Moisen 2008). We used AUC as a metric to evaluate model performance. The package also computes threshold values using several accuracy metrics to translate predicted probability maps into binary suitable and unsuitable habitats. We selected the MeanProb, a threshold set based on the mean predicted probability of species occurrences. The output from Maxent are grid datasets in a multiband ‘tif''format with one band for each replication. We averaged the five replicated maps and created a mean grid for each species. The grid was then symbolized to represent low (threshold-50), medium (50-75) and high (75-100) habitat suitability, with pixel values that are below the threshold excluded. Models were reviewed by CDFW species experts; please review the use limitations.For more information see the project report at [https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=85358].

Tags: auth_cdfw, california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, cdfw, cn-mule-deer, connectivity-modeling, ds1047_20141006_wm, habitat-modeling, mammal, sn-odocoileus-hemionus
Organization: State of California
Utility Solar Generation and Capacity by Type and County Table: 2019

<span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>Utility Solar Generation and Capacity by Type and County Table: 2019</span>

Tags: california-energy-commission, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, ead
Organization: State of California
Interagency Ecological Program: Discrete water quality monitoring in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay-Delta, collected by the Environmental Monitoring Program, 2000-2018.

The Interagency Ecological Program’s (IEP) Environmental Monitoring Program (EMP) has historically monitored discrete water quality and nutrients in the San Francisco Estuary. The objectives of the EMP are to: (1) obtain consistent and accurate monthly data at established monitoring stations, (2) to provide and document information necessary to achieve compliance with salinity, flow, and dissolved oxygen standards, and (3) to report this information for the purpose of management and conservation of the upper San Francisco Estuary. This dataset is a subset of the larger EMP dataset that includes discrete water quality data collected from 2000-2018. Beginning in 2000, 11 stations were sampled for a full suite of water quality analytes while the remaining 11 were sampled for chlorophyll a and pheophytin a only, totaling 22 stations sampled each month. By 2018, that number increased to 28 stations sampled each month with the full suite of water quality analytes collected at every station. The EMP collects discrete water quality measurements 1-meter below the surface of the water and 1-meter above the bottom of the channel during high slack tide. Over the period of record, the following water quality parameters have been added: pH, total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, dissolved calcium, a rating score for the blue-green algae, Microcystis aeruginosa, and near bottom measurements.

Tags: algae, ammonia, calcium, california-department-of-water-resources, carbon, chloride, conductivity, depth, dissolved-nutrients, dissolved-organic-carbon, dissolved-organic-nitrogen, estuaries, fluorescence, freshwater, latitude, long-term-monitoring, longitude, measurements, monitoring, nitrate, nitrite, nitrogen, nutrients, organic-carbon, organic-nitrogen, oxygen, ph, phaeophytin, phosphorus, rivers, secchi-depth, silica, temperature, total-organic-carbon, total-phosphorus, turbidity, water-quality, water-temperature, wind-speed
Organization: State of California
Utility Hydroelectric Capacity by Size and County: 2020

<div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>Energy generation data and map are from the California Energy Commission.</div><div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>Map depicts utility scale hydroelectric capacity, with large hydroelectric</div><div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>capacity being &gt;30MW, and small hydroelectric capacity being ≤30MW.</div><div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>Counties without symbols have no utility scale hydroelectric capacity. Data is</div><div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>from 2020 and is current as of July 29, 2022. Projection: NAD 1983 (2011)</div><div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>California (Teale) Albers (Meters). For more information, contact Rebecca</div><div style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size:16px;'>Vail at (916) 477-0738 or John Hingtgen at (916) 510-9747.</div>

Tags: california-energy-commission, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata
Organization: State of California
Least Bittern Range - CWHR B050 [ds608]

<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Vector datasets of CWHR range maps are one component of California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR), a comprehensive information system and predictive model for California's wildlife. The CWHR System was developed to support habitat conservation and management, land use planning, impact assessment, education, and research involving terrestrial vertebrates in California. CWHR contains information on life history, management status, geographic distribution, and habitat relationships for wildlife species known to occur regularly in California. Range maps represent the maximum, current geographic extent of each species within California. They were originally delineated at a scale of 1:5,000,000 by species-level experts and have gradually been revised at a scale of 1:1,000,000. For more information about CWHR, visit the CWHR webpage (</SPAN><A href="https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR</SPAN></A><SPAN>). The webpage provides links to download CWHR data and user documents such as a look up table of available range maps including species code, species name, and range map revision history; a full set of CWHR GIS data; .pdf files of each range map or species life history accounts; and a User Guide.</SPAN></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>

Tags: auth_cdfw, bird, california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, cdfw, cn-least-bittern, ds0608_20160308_wm, habitat, natural-resources, sn-ixobrychus-exilis, species, wildlife
Organization: State of California
Total Generation by Type and County: 2022

<div>Energy generation data are from the California Energy Commission's Quarterly Fuel and Energy Report and the Wind Generation Reporting System databases. Map depicts utility scale power plants (with nameplate capacity of 1 MW or more). Hydroelectric plants are designated as a renewable energy source if their nameplate capacity is 30 MW or less. Renewables include Biomass, Geothermal, Solar Photovoltaic, Solar Thermal, Small Hydroelectric, and Wind. Counties without symbols had no utility-scale plants. Data is from 2022 and is current as of August 10, 2023. For more information, contact Gordon Huang at gordon.huang@energy.ca.gov or John Hingtgen at john.hingtgen@energy.ca.gov.</div>

Tags: california-energy-commission, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, ead
Organization: State of California
California Electric Balancing Authority Areas (Retired)

<div>A balancing authority is responsible for operating a transmission control area. It matches generation with load and maintains consistent electric frequency of the grid, even during extreme weather conditions or natural disasters. The California Independent System Operator (CAISO) is the largest of about 38 balancing authorities in the western interconnection coordinating council (WECC), handling an estimated 35 percent of the electric load in the west. CAISO manages 80 percent of the load in California and a small portion of Nevada.</div><div><br /></div><div>The main balancing authorities in California are:</div><div><ul><li><a href='https://www.caiso.com/about/Pages/OurBusiness/The-ISO-grid.aspx' rel='nofollow ugc' target='_blank'>CAISO - California Independent System Operator</a><br /></li><li><a href='http://www.thebanc.org/' rel='nofollow ugc' target='_blank'>BANC - Balancing Authority of Northern California</a><br /></li><li>LADWP - Los Angeles Department of Water &amp; Power</li><li>IID - Imperial Irrigation District</li><li>TID - Turlock Irrigation District</li><li>WALC - Western Area Power Administration, Lower Colorado</li><li>PacifiCorp West</li><li>NV Energy</li></ul></div>

Tags: balancing-authority, banc, caiso, california-energy-commission, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, electric, iid, ladwp, nv-energy, pacificcorp-west, tid, transmission-line, walc
Organization: State of California
Chronic Wasting Disease Sampling Stations - 2025 - CDFW [ds3154]

<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div><p><span>This data is associated with the following layers: </span></p><ul><li><p><span>Chronic Wasting Disease Sampling Stations - 2023-2024 - CDFW [ds3182] (</span><a href='https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=3182' target='_blank' style='text-decoration:underline;' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><span>https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=31</span><span>82</span></a><span>), </span></p></li><li><p><span>Participating Meat Processors and Taxidermists - 2025 - CDFW [ds3155] (</span><a href='https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov:443/bios6/?al=3155' style='text-decoration:underline;' rel='nofollow ugc'><span>https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=3155</span></a><span>), </span></p></li><li><p><span>Participating Meat Processors and Taxidermists - 2023-2024 - CDFW [ds3188] (</span><a href='https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=3188' target='_blank' style='text-decoration:underline;' rel='nofollow ugc noopener noreferrer'><span>https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=3188</span></a><span>), </span></p></li><li><p><span>Approved Deer Carcass Disposal Sites - CDFW [ds3156] (</span><a href='https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov:443/bios6/?al=3156' style='text-decoration:underline;' rel='nofollow ugc'><span>https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=3156</span></a><span>), </span></p></li><li><p><span>Chronic Wasting Disease Surveys - CDFW [ds3157] (</span><a href='https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov:443/bios6/?al=3157' style='text-decoration:underline;' rel='nofollow ugc'><span>https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/bios6/?al=3157</span></a><span>). </span></p></li></ul><p><span>These layers include CWD Testing Sites, Participating Meat Processors and Taxidermists (MPT), Carcass Disposal Sites, and comprehensive data on CWD surveillance spanning from 1999 to 2025. This compilation of layers provides a comprehensive view of CWD-related activities, facilitating informed decision-making and strategic planning for wildlife management and disease prevention efforts. For the latest information, please visit </span><a href='https://wildlife.ca.gov:443/CWD' style='text-decoration:underline;' rel='nofollow ugc'><span>https://wildlife.ca.gov/CWD</span></a><span>. </span></p></div></div></div>

Tags: auth_cdfw, california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, cdfw, chronic-wasting-disease, cwd, deer, ds3154_20250606_wm, elk, sample, sampling-station, test, testing-site
Organization: State of California
Vegetation - Liberty Island - 2012 [ds821]

<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This map was digitized using 2010 true-color 1-meter National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) aerial imagery. The minimum mapping unit is 0.25 acre with a 10-foot minimum width. The map classification is the same as used for the Delta Vegetation and Land Use map that was based on 2002 imagery and finalized in 2007. The map [ds292] can be obtained here: </SPAN><A href="https://wildlife.ca.gov:443/Data/BIOS" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/BIOS</SPAN></A><SPAN>. The report, which provides the classification detail can be obtained here: </SPAN><A href="https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov:443/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18211" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18211</SPAN></A><SPAN>. Because Liberty Island was mapped as part of the Delta mapping effort, changes over the eight year period between imagery dates can be seen, most obviously land accretion and erosion and invasion of the non-native water primrose, Ludwigia. Mappers used reconnaissance-level data to refine and verify the map. The data were collected at 48 points during two field missions: 1) August 9, 2012 by land covering the levee on the western boundary of the area, and 2) August 28 - 29, 2012 by boat. All vegetation samples were marked with GPS units and can serve as long-term monitoring points. Photos taken at these GPS points can be used for future monitoring. A database of field data and the digital photos are archived at the office of the Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP) of DFW. This map has not been assessed for accuracy, but over 25% of the polygons were visited during field reconnaissance. Lead staff of the program cross-checked and edited the map attributes and delineations. </SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>

Tags: auth_cdfw, california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, cdfw, ds0821_20241030_wm, vegetation
Organization: State of California
i08 C2VSimFG StreamNodes WithBudgets

<div style='text-align:Left; font-size:12pt;'><p><span style='font-family:&quot;Avenir Next W01&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next W00&quot;, &quot;Avenir Next&quot;, Avenir, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif;'>The stream network simulated in C2VSimFG consists of 4,634 stream nodes that make up 110 stream reaches. The stream nodes correspond to groundwater node locations where simulated streams exist. Each stream node is used to define physical properties of the stream including, depth-flow rating tables, stream bottom elevations, streambed thickness, streambed conductance, and wetted perimeter. Stream nodes are also where calculations are performed during a simulation, where diversions, stream inflows, and bypasses can occur within the model. C2VSimFG simulates streamflow of the key components of the river system, including the upstream inflows, diversions, return flows, bypasses, and stream-aquifer interaction at every stream node to generate the water budgets.</span><br /></p></div>

Tags: c2vsimfg, california-department-of-water-resources, central-valley, dwr, dwr-gis-atlas, groundwater, groundwater-analysis, hydrological-model, model, stream
Organization: State of California
Fairview Slender Salamander Range - CWHR A073 [ds1183]

<DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 14 0;"><SPAN><SPAN>Vector datasets of CWHR range maps are one component of California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR), a comprehensive information system and predictive model for California's wildlife. The CWHR System was developed to support habitat conservation and management, land use planning, impact assessment, education, and research involving terrestrial vertebrates in California. CWHR contains information on life history, management status, geographic distribution, and habitat relationships for wildlife species known to occur regularly in California. Range maps represent the maximum, current geographic extent of each species within California. They were originally delineated at a scale of 1:5,000,000 by species-level experts and have gradually been revised at a scale of 1:1,000,000. For more information about CWHR, visit the CWHR webpage (</SPAN><A href="https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;"><SPAN>https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR</SPAN></A><SPAN>). The webpage provides links to download CWHR data and user documents such as a look up table of available range maps including species code, species name, and range map revision history; a full set of CWHR GIS data; .pdf files of each range map or species life history accounts; and a User Guide.</SPAN></SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>

Tags: amphibian, auth_cdfw, california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, cdfw, cn-fairview-slender-salamander, ds1183_20160222_wm, habitat, natural-resources, sn-batrachoseps-bramei, species, wildlife
Organization: State of California
Geothermal Electricity Capacity by County: 2022

<span style='font-size:15px;'>Energy capacity data and map are from the California Energy Commission. Map depicts geothermal energy capacity by county. Unshaded counties had no commercial geothermal energy capacity. Data is from 2022 and is current as of May 14, 2024. Projection: NAD 1983 (2011) California (Teale) Albers (Meters). For more information, contact John Hingtgen at 916 510-9747 or Jessica Lin at 415 990-8392.</span>

Tags: california-energy-commission, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, ead
Organization: State of California
Elk Creek Seismic Waveforms 2012 (Part 7 of 20)

Coal bursts (damaging seismic events in underground coal mines) pose a substantial threat to operations and mine workers. The underground coal mines in Colorado’s North Fork Valley (NFV) have experienced many coal bursts, often with distinct characteristics from those of other US coal mining regions. To better understand these events and manage their associated risks, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health undertook a long-term monitoring campaign at the Elk Creek Mine in the NFV. The monitoring efforts included a seismic network composed of both surface and underground sensors, borehole pressure cells (BPCs), instrumented support Cans, convergence monitors, ground condition surveys, and several other data sources. This dataset consists of the event waveform files from the seismic network for the 983,379 events that were detected during the monitoring campaign. The waveforms are stored in HDF5 files that are broken up by week. Within the HDF5 files, the data are organized by station id, event time, and channel. The amplitudes are velocity in meters/second.
 
This is download 34 of 48 and corresponds to the time range between April 23, 2012, and May 28, 2012.

Tags: industry
Organization: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
FTB EITC Summary of CA Residents Year Comparison Apr 2025

Produced by the Economic & Statistical Research Bureau, monthly tabulations of tax filings statistics for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), Young Child Tax Credit (YCTC) and Foster Youth Tax Credit (FYTC) provide credit use by county, preparer type, credit amount allowed number of dependents and a many other useful cross-sections.

Tags: california-franchise-tax-board, comparison, eitc, ftb, fytc, monthly, yctc
Organization: State of California
Mule Deer Migration Lines - Modoc Interstate CA and OR - 1999-2001, 2017-2020 [ds2893]

<div style='text-align:Left;'><div><div><p style='margin:0 0 11 0;'><span><span>The project leads for the collection of this data were Julie Garcia and Richard Shinn. Female mule deer were captured in February 2017 and equipped with satellite collars manufactured by Lotek, which collected GPS data to June 2020. Additional GPS data was collected from deer in 1999-2001 and included in the analysis to supplement the small sample size of the 2017-2020 dataset. The data was collected from deer throughout Modoc County with a priority to ascertain general distributions, survival, and home range and not to model migration routes, hence the low sample sizes in specific winter ranges. The Modoc Interstate deer herd migrates from a winter range near Clear Lake Reservoir in Modoc County, California north into Oregon in Klamath and Lake counties for the summer. GPS locations were fixed at 12-hour intervals in the 2017-2020 dataset and 8-hour intervals in the 1999-2001 dataset. </span></span></p><p style='margin:0 0 11 0;'><span><span>Migration lines as symbolized connect GPS data points per deer per seasonal migration. GPS points were extracted only during migrations using net-squared displacement graphs. Sixteen migration sequences from 12 deer, with an average migration time of 23.89 days and an average migration distance of 69.71 km, were obtained from the 1999-2001 dataset. Thirty-six migration sequences from 9 deer, with an average migration time of 19.53 days and an average migration distance of 87.57 km, were obtained from the 2017-2020 dataset. </span></span></p></div></div></div>

Tags: auth_cdfw, california-department-of-fish-and-wildlife, california-natural-resources-agency, caopendata, cdfw, connectivity, ds2893_20210127_wm, gps, migration-lines, migration-mapper, modoc, mule-deer, odocoileus-hemionus, telemetry
Organization: State of California