AndreaBozzo/ceres-open-data-index huggingface dataset:
Auditing Firm Directory for Nonprofits

A. SUMMARY
This dataset was created to support local nonprofit organizations seeking qualified and available auditors to perform their auditing work timely. Included in this dataset are accounting firm details on: 

1. The budget size of nonprofits the firms are interested in working with
2. Whether the firms have prior nonprofit auditing experience
3. The firms' ability to work on-site in San Francisco
4. The firms' ability to perform Single Audits for nonprofits receiving Federal funding
5. Additional types of services the firms provide in addition to auditing


B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED
The Controller’s Office surveyed over 400 local, state, and national accounting firms to develop this dataset, asking surveyed firms to provide details on their interest and history with conducting nonprofit financial audits. This dataset reflects verbatim the most recent survey responses; firms may not have answered all questions.


C. UPDATE PROCESS
The Controller's Office provides a live link to allow firms to submit new or updated data at any time. Approximately twice annually, the Controller's Office will refresh the posted dataset with new results submitted in the prior period. 


D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET
Use this dataset to find accounting firms that meet your organization's needs. Please note nonprofit organizations are strongly encouraged to do further outreach and perform additional review of qualifications to confirm firms’ nonprofit auditing expertise and capacity. Nonprofit organizations are also encouraged to do additional research to identify accounting firms best suited for their organization’s needs.


E. RELATED DATASETS
Not applicable.

Tags: nonprofit
Organization: City of San Francisco
Historic Preservation Survey Units

A. SUMMARY
This dataset is an export from the SF Planning Department's Arches implementation (https://sfculturalheritage.org/search) showing survey results of the San Francisco Cultural Resources Survey.  

B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED
Exported from SF Planning Department's Arches implementation

C. UPDATE PROCESS
Updated as needed

D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET
Each row represents a parcel, with the associated survey result.

Organization: City of San Francisco
Soft-Story Properties

The Mandatory Soft Story Program provides a weekly update on the status of properties identified as soft story.

The dataset represents the different Compliance Tiers for the Mandatory Soft Story Program and the current status of these properties. For more information on the Compliance Tiers, please contact the Soft Story Program.

Tier I. Buildings that contain a Group A, E, R- 2.1, R-3.1 or R-4 occupancy on any story

Tier II. Buildings containing 15 or more dwelling units, except for buildings assigned to Tier I or Tier IV

Tier III. Building not falling within the definition of another tier.

Tier IV. Buildings that contain a Group B or M occupancy on the first story or in a basement or underfloor area that has any portion extending above grade, and buildings that are in mapped liquefaction zones, except for buildings assigned to Tier 1.

Organization: City of San Francisco
Mid-Year Grants 925

In accordance with <a href="https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chicago/latest/chicago_il/0-0-0-2596061" target="_blank">MCC 2-4-055</a>, the Office of Budget and Management releases a Mid-Year Budget Report, which provides information on the City’s financial information through the mid-point of the City’s fiscal year. While most of the required information is included directly in the report, some datasets are provided on the Chicago Data Portal. As described in the Mid-Year Report, this dataset provides details for the Grants 925 Appropriation. 

925 Grant Appropriation:
When a City department receives a new grant award or a grant award that is higher than the amount appropriated in the annual budget, City Council approval is required to accept and spend the grant funds. OBM coordinates with City Departments to bring “925 Amendments” before the Committee on Budget and Government Operations each month.

Data Limitations:
The data available herein reflects all grant expenditures and balances on active grant awards from the inception of the award through the designated reporting period. Because grant award periods often do not align with the City’s fiscal year and can extend over multiple years, active grants are tracked on a rolling basis. The data reflects grant awards that have been received and set up in the City’s financial system, not all grant appropriations reflected in the current year's ordinance, as not all grant awards have been received. Please note, expenditure data for programs funded through the American Rescue Plan Act’s State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund is not within this dataset.

Tags: budget, federal, finance
Organization: City of Chicago
Civil List

The Civil List reports the agency code (DPT), first initial and last name (NAME), agency name (ADDRESS), title code (TTL #), pay class (PC), and salary (SAL-RATE) of individuals who were employed by the City of New York at any given time during the indicated year.

Tags: admin, cei, citywide-equity-and-inclusion, civil-service, construction-and-technical-services, cts, dcas, dem, department-of-citywide-administrative-services, department-of-energy-management, eal-estate-services, employees, facilities-management, fbm, fiscal-and-business-management, fleet, fm, hc, human-capital, ocp, office-of-citywide-procurement, office-of-general-counsel, ogc, pay, payroll, res, salary
Organization: City of New York
NYC Climate Budgeting Report: Climate Alignment Assessment and Capital Climate Investments

This dataset rates all projects in the capital budget with over $50,000 with their climate alignment and categorizes investments that are related to climate. Amounts are in thousands. This dataset will be updated once a year during the Executive Budget.

This data can be used to create visualizations similar to the charts featured in the Climate Investments section of the FY25 New York City Climate Budgeting publication (https://www.nyc.gov/assets/omb/downloads/pdf/exec24-nyccb.pdf).

You can find the complete collection of Climate Budget data by <a href="https://data.cityofnewyork.us/browse?Data-Collection_Data-Collection=Climate+Budgeting" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">clicking here.</a>

Tags: capital-climate-investments, climate-alignment-assessment, climate-budgeting, executive-budget
Organization: City of New York
NYCHA Resident Data Book Summary

Contains resident demographic data at a summary level.
The Resident Data Book is compiled to serve as an information source for queries involving resident demographic as well as a source of data for internal analysis.  Statistics are compiled via HUD mandated annual income reviews involving NYCHA Staff and residents. Data is then aggregated and compiled by development.  Each record pertains to a single public housing development.

Tags: demographics-by-borough, nyc-housing, nycha, public-housing, resident-data-book, statistics
Organization: City of New York
Washington_County_2022_GeologicFormations

This layer contains data concerning the location and characteristics of bedrock, mappable geologic units, within Washington county. This geodatabase contains geologic data from Washington County, Maryland. Data from several geologic quadrangles and two regional scale geologic maps were incorporated into the regional scale geologic feature classes in this geodatabase. Because of the scale of this map, some features were generalized slightly from the quad scale data. Additionally, some corrections were made for accuracy, such as edge matching to resolve "border faults". The source data for this map and geodatabase come from maps published by the Maryland Geological Survey from 2001 to the present, as well as one map published in cooperation with the United States Geological Survey. The source maps are Buckeystown (2001), Catoctin Furnace (2004), Frederick (2004), New Windsor (2004), Point of Rocks (2004), Walkersville (2004), Woodsboro (2004), Middletown (2005), Union Bridge (2006), Funkstown (2009), Keedysville, Shepherdstown, Charlestown, and Harpers Ferry (2009), Myersville and Smithsburg (2009), Hagerstown (2013), Mason and Dixon (2013), Clear Spring and Hedgesville (2014), Williamsport (2014), Blue Ridge Summit (2021, in review), Emmitsburg and Taneytown (2021, in review), all 1:24000 quadrangle scale, as well as portions of two regional maps: Geologic Map of Garrett, Allegany, and Western Washington Counties, Maryland (2013), and Geologic Map of the Frederick 30' x 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia (USGS, 2007). The GIS data from the referenced maps were mosaiced in Arc Map, corrected for accuracy across quad boundaries, merged to form a continuous dataset and clipped to the extent of Washington County. Feature level metadata are included, which contain field descriptions for each feature class. This is a small scale dataset, appropriate for 1:100,000 regional scale. Quad scale data are suggested for display or analysis that requires a larger scale. This dataset is prepared for compliance with the USGS GeMS database standard. Last Updated: 06/01/2022

Organization: State of Maryland
Guided Wildlife Viewing

Maryland, through its Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program, is collecting information on how the public uses the Chesapeake Bay waters and adjacent lands. These baseline data will inform planning efforts being undertaken by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to help inform public access, land acquisition, and future oyster aquaculture planning and decision-making. Collecting data on the variety of ways our Chesapeake waters are used will help us plan for reducing use conflicts in our coastal waters, maximizing efficiency, and enhancing environmental and economic productivity. Chesapeake Bay waters are used in many ways: commercial fishing, aquaculture, transport, habitat for wildlife, and recreation, among others. With new and expanding coastal and marine uses, as well as Maryland’s growing coastal population, the pressure is mounting to ensure that there is space for both traditional and new uses and that conflicts are minimized. Some mapped human use data exist, but Maryland has limited recreational water use data for the Chesapeake waters. Basic data on how we use our coastal waters was collected by inviting residents and experts to share their knowledge about recreational uses at workshops using geographical information systems technology.

Organization: State of Maryland
Shore Use

Maryland, through its Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program, is collecting information on how the public uses the Chesapeake Bay waters and adjacent lands. These baseline data will inform planning efforts being undertaken by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to help inform public access, land acquisition, and future oyster aquaculture planning and decision-making. Collecting data on the variety of ways our Chesapeake waters are used will help us plan for reducing use conflicts in our coastal waters, maximizing efficiency, and enhancing environmental and economic productivity. Chesapeake Bay waters are used in many ways: commercial fishing, aquaculture, transport, habitat for wildlife, and recreation, among others. With new and expanding coastal and marine uses, as well as Maryland’s growing coastal population, the pressure is mounting to ensure that there is space for both traditional and new uses and that conflicts are minimized. Some mapped human use data exist, but Maryland has limited recreational water use data for the Chesapeake waters. Basic data on how we use our coastal waters was collected by inviting residents and experts to share their knowledge about recreational uses at workshops using geographical information systems technology.

Organization: State of Maryland
Guided Rafting

These baseline recreational use data will inform planning efforts being undertaken by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to help inform public access, land acquisition, future planning and decision-making. Collecting data on the variety of ways the Chesapeake waters and surrounding lands are used will help us plan for reducing use conflicts in our coastal waters, maximizing efficiency, and enhancing environmental and economic productivity. Chesapeake Bay waters are used in many ways: commercial fishing, aquaculture, transport, habitat for wildlife, and recreation, among others. With new and expanding coastal and marine uses, as well as Maryland’s growing coastal population, the pressure is mounting to ensure that there is space for both traditional and new uses and that conflicts are minimized. Some mapped human use data exist, but Maryland has limited recreational water use data for the Chesapeake waters. Basic data on how we use our coastal waters was collected by inviting residents and experts to share their knowledge about recreational uses at workshops using geographical information systems technology.

Organization: State of Maryland
8 Digit Watersheds

This file (SWSUB8) is a statewide digital watershed file. It depicts the State with 138 separate watersheds each with an 8-digit numeric code. The file was created primarily for State and Federal agency use. The creation of this file goes back many years and involved several State and Federal agencies. This file was derived from a more detailed watershed file (Maryland's Third-Order Watershed). The process used to create this file is consistent with the elevation contour information found on the US Geological Survey's 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle maps and the Maryland Department of the Environment's watershed location and naming conventions. This file is similar, but not identical, to the US Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC11) watershed file. The watersheds define Strahler (Strahler 1952 p.1120) third order stream drainage by contours on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute quadrangle map sheets. Some watershed drainage areas were defined for streams less than third order and some large area Watersheds were split to maintain a maximum size of 15,000 acres.

Organization: State of Maryland
Long Term Care

OP&R organizes and prepares for public health and medical emergencies through statewide partnerships with public, private and government agencies to coordinate an effective emergency response for the health and safety of all residents of Maryland. The Office of Preparedness and Response is responsible for staffing the Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene (DHMH) Command Center during a significant public health event such as pandemic, natural disaster, act of terrorism or any incident that requires the coordination of state level health department resources. All staff are trained in the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and Incident Command System (ICS). The DHMH Command Center coordinates the state health department response to an incident in collaboration with the MEMA's Emergency Operations Center and other state agencies.

Organization: State of Maryland
Charter Wildlife Viewing

As a member of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO), Maryland, through its Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program is collecting information on how the public uses the Atlantic coast of Maryland. These baseline data will inform planning efforts being undertaken by the Maryland Department of Natural Recources to help develop a Maryland Ocean Plan. Collecting data on the variety of ways you use the Seaside Bays and Atlantic Ocean will help us plan for reducing use conflicts in our coastal waters, maximizing efficiency, and enhancing environmental and economic productivity. State and federally managed waters of Maryland and the U.S. are used in many ways: commercial fishing, aquaculture, shipping, military exercises, sand mining, habitat for wildlife, and recreation. With new and expanding coastal and ocean uses emerging such as energy production and increased shipping and considering Maryland coastal population is increasing, the pressure is mounting to ensure that there is space for both traditional and new uses and that conflicts are minimized. Some mapped human use data exist, but Maryland has limited recreational water use data for its Atlantic Coast and Coastal Bays. So basic data on how we use our coastal waters will be collected by inviting residents and experts to share their knowledge about recreational uses at workshops using geographical information systems technology.

Organization: State of Maryland
Chesapeake Bay Clayey Sand

This is a data table, in comma-delimited, ASCII format, which contains information about selected physical properties, particularly grain size, of 4,255 surficial sediment samples from the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. Samples were collected on a 1-km grid by the Maryland Geological Survey (MGS) between June 1976 and August 1984. Consider the age of the data (1976-1984), the sampling density (1-km grid) and the spatial and temporal variability of estuarine sediments in evaluating the fitness for use of this data set. Graphic displays and printed tabular listings derived from this data set may be used in publications and presentations, provided that credit is given to the originators of the data set (see Section 1.1).

Organization: State of Maryland
Chesapeake Bay Sand Silt Clay

This is a data table, in comma-delimited, ASCII format, which contains information about selected physical properties, particularly grain size, of 4,255 surficial sediment samples from the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. Samples were collected on a 1-km grid by the Maryland Geological Survey (MGS) between June 1976 and August 1984. Consider the age of the data (1976-1984), the sampling density (1-km grid) and the spatial and temporal variability of estuarine sediments in evaluating the fitness for use of this data set. Graphic displays and printed tabular listings derived from this data set may be used in publications and presentations, provided that credit is given to the originators of the data set (see Section 1.1).

Organization: State of Maryland
Yates Oyster Bars

This dataset represents the results of the six years' work of the Maryland Oyster Survey, authorized by Congress and begun in 1906.Three separate government bureaus and one State commission participated in the Maryland Oyster Survey - the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, U.S. Bureau of Chemistry, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, and the Maryland Shellfish Commission. Authoritative Maryland Yates Bars only, not to be confused with the Maryland Historical Bottoms Dataset which include the Yates Bars plus other boundary layers that were conflated in a set spatial geoprocessing method. Yates Bars boundaries have been digitized from Charts and Surveys with only projection related geospatial processes no other applied methods.

Organization: State of Maryland
Preliminary FEMA Floodplain

This layer offers the anticipated floodplain boundaries however, the data shown are in the process of being reviewed and adopted by FEMA and a given community.  Changes to the Preliminary boundaries may occur before official map adoption. Use this layer with caution. The effective regulatory floodplain should be used for conducting all official floodplain determinations until such time the preliminary floodplain is reviewed and adopted by FEMA and a given community. It is reasonable to assume that preliminary floodplain boundaries are more accurate than the Q3, but the Q3 may better represent the current regulatory Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) when verified by using the paper FIRM. 
Last Updated: 8/31/2017

Organization: State of Maryland
Washington_County_2022_GeologicContactsAndFaults

This layer contains data concerning the location and characteristics of contacts and faults within Washington county. This geodatabase contains geologic data from Washington County, Maryland. Data from several geologic quadrangles and two regional scale geologic maps were incorporated into the regional scale geologic feature classes in this geodatabase. Because of the scale of this map, some features were generalized slightly from the quad scale data. Additionally, some corrections were made for accuracy, such as edge matching to resolve "border faults". The source data for this map and geodatabase come from maps published by the Maryland Geological Survey from 2001 to the present, as well as one map published in cooperation with the United States Geological Survey. The source maps are Buckeystown (2001), Catoctin Furnace (2004), Frederick (2004), New Windsor (2004), Point of Rocks (2004), Walkersville (2004), Woodsboro (2004), Middletown (2005), Union Bridge (2006), Funkstown (2009), Keedysville, Shepherdstown, Charlestown, and Harpers Ferry (2009), Myersville and Smithsburg (2009), Hagerstown (2013), Mason and Dixon (2013), Clear Spring and Hedgesville (2014), Williamsport (2014), Blue Ridge Summit (2021, in review), Emmitsburg and Taneytown (2021, in review), all 1:24000 quadrangle scale, as well as portions of two regional maps: Geologic Map of Garrett, Allegany, and Western Washington Counties, Maryland (2013), and Geologic Map of the Frederick 30' x 60' Quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia (USGS, 2007). The GIS data from the referenced maps were mosaiced in Arc Map, corrected for accuracy across quad boundaries, merged to form a continuous dataset and clipped to the extent of Washington County. Feature level metadata are included, which contain field descriptions for each feature class. This is a small scale dataset, appropriate for 1:100,000 regional scale. Quad scale data are suggested for display or analysis that requires a larger scale. This dataset is prepared for compliance with the USGS GeMS database standard. Last Updated: 06/01/2022

Organization: State of Maryland