Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume XI, South Asia Crisis, 1971
Document 139
139. Memorandum of Conversation
1
Washington
,
September 2, 1971
.
SUBJECT
Military Supply Pipeline for Pakistan
PARTICIPANTS
The Secretary
Christopher Van Hollen
, Deputy Assistant Secretary,
NEA
Peter D. Constable, Senior Political Officer, Pakistan–Afghanistan Affairs
Maj. Gen.
Inam-ul Haq
, Director General, Defense Procurement; Pakistan Ministry of Defense
Mr. Z.M. Farooqi, Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of Pakistan

The Secretary welcomed General
Haq
to Washington and expressed his deep appreciation for President
Yahya
ʼs prompt response to Mr.
Sisco
ʼs suggestion that our two governments look at ways to deal with the remaining military supply pipeline. He also expressed appreciation of President
Yahya
ʼs understanding of the problems that military supply pipeline presents. The Secretary stated, however, that he wanted to make clear Mr.
Sisco
ʼs suggestion was just that. We are not pressing the Government of Pakistan. We want to take a look at the problem together. We do not want to change our policy toward Pakistan or to do anything that will hurt Pakistan. If it does work out, it would be to our mutual advantage, since it would give us an opportunity to try to play a constructive role in economic assistance. Comparing the military supply pipeline of $2.6 million with the economic assistance pipeline of $80 million, it is apparent which is the more important. While the military supply question is not an important issue in domestic politics, Congressional opposition to military supply has created a potential political problem in
U.S.
-Pakistan relations. The pipeline question may impair our ability to be helpful with economic assistance. It is in this context that Mr.
Sisco
asked Ambassador
Hilaly
if shipments from the remaining small pipeline might be speeded up or items ordered elsewhere. If that were done, then we could make a low-key statement to the effect that shipments from the pipeline had been completed.
Major General
Haq
replied by expressing President
Yahya
ʼs deep appreciation for being taken into confidence. He does not want to cause any difficulties for President
Nixon
and he is aware of the political pressures. President
Yahya
had instructed him to cooperate fully with us. There is tremendous good will in Pakistan for the United States and there might be some bafflement when the public learns the United States is no longer shipping military items to Pakistan. However, he hoped the announcement can be worded in such a way as to avoid any impression that we have joined hands with India. The General noted that the recent Indo-Soviet treaty had caused an imbalance in the Subcontinent and he alleged that the Indians would be receiving 400 T–60 series tanks from the Soviets as a result of the treaty, while the Soviets had now cut off spares for the inferior tanks they had previously supplied to Pakistan. It was obvious, according to the General, that the new Soviet tanks were for Indian use on the plains of the Punjab. The imbalance of power could be increased by Pakistanʼs difficulties in maintaining
U.S.
equipment, particularly aircraft. He added, however, that they would try for the time being to find alternate sources for the spares. He concluded by saying they would try to ship out as much as possible in as short a time as possible. He also raised a question as to the feasibility of air cargo shipments out by MATS flights, but also recognized possible problems with this method.

The Secretary then emphasized our interest in a low-key announcement, perhaps by the State Department spokesman, noting simply that Pakistan had completed its shipments of military supply items, or some similar formulation that we could mutually agree on. The General and Mr. Farooqi expressed their agreement with and appreciation for this kind of formulation.
Mr. Farooqi asked whether the resolution of the military supply question would enable the United States to take the lead with the Consortium countries in economic assistance questions. The Secretary replied that it would make it easier. In response to Farooqiʼs observation that President
Yahya
also hoped there could be a resumption of arms shipments when conditions settled down, the Secretary noted that while we need not go into that question now, relations between the United States and Pakistan and their leaders were very close and cordial.
(
Note
: In an earlier conversation with the General, Mr.
Van Hollen
sketched out briefly the mechanics of the “drying out” exercise as we saw it, pointing out the need for rapid movement, if there were to be advantage in an announcement before the Senate considered the foreign assistance legislation. Subsequently in the technical discussions with General
Haq
, Mr. Constable pointed out that we were thinking in terms of completion of shipments by the end of September.)
Contents
Preface
Sources
Abbreviations