Why Did Allah Allow People Of The Book To Corrupt Crucial Details?
﷽ وَكَذَٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَا لِكُلِّ نَبِىٍّ عَدُوًّا شَيَٰطِينَ ٱلْإِنسِ وَٱلْجِنِّ يُوحِى بَعْضُهُمْ إِلَىٰ بَعْضٍ زُخْرُفَ ٱلْقَوْلِ غُرُورًا ۚ وَلَوْ شَآءَ رَبُّكَ مَا فَعَلُوهُ ۖ فَذَرْهُمْ وَمَا يَفْتَرُونَ ‎﴿١١٢﴾‏ وَلِتَصْغَىٰٓ إِلَيْهِ أَفْـِٔدَةُ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱلْـَٔاخِرَةِ وَلِيَرْضَوْهُ وَلِيَقْتَرِفُوا۟ مَا هُم مُّقْتَرِفُونَ ‎﴿١١٣﴾ And thus We have made for every prophet an enemy – devilish human and jinn, inspiring to one another decorative speech in delusion. But if your Lord had willed, they would not have done it, so leave them and that which they invent. (١١٢) And so the hearts of those who disbelieve in the Hereafter will incline toward it and that they will be satisfied with it and that they will commit that which they are committing. (١١٣) -Quran 6:112-113
Alright brother, if you r satisfied that Allah left things vague then keep looking, i do not think you will find anything enriching for your faith. Please share if you do I am surprise that you believe that bible is corrupted and also believe that they (jewish and christian scholars) aren’t twisting the words? They have a history of corrupting their own scriptures, every faction of both jewish and christians have revised their books so many times. There own research has proven that. but your argument is that they are innocent as the word Ahmad SAW is not in the bible so they can not come to islam because Allah allowed them to remove it from the bible. Similarly Allah allowed the translations of quran to be corrupted but we have the original text so we r ok. But christians and jews can not learn the history of scripture alterations done over centuries and come to conclude that Ahmad must be there and it must be altered? 7 days after birth his grandfather named him Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim, later Abul Qasim was added as Kunniyah after birth of his son Qasim RA the reports for Amina RA naming him Ahmad SAW r like she had dream… There’s significant christian scholarship surrounding how muslims invented these to make the quran correct. M. Watt goes to length that there’s no Ahmad till atlest 125-200 yrs after the death of Muhammad SAW. Abu Talib has, reportedly, said some poetry calling him Ahmad in Shia litreture His name was Muhammad SAW, Allah called him directly by this name in the Quran 3:144, 33:40, 47:2, 48:29 Ahmad isn’t a name but a quality. Similar to Mehdi, its not a name but quality. All religious scriptures are devoid of any name given by any prophet for the next prophet in line. They always gave descriptions of qualities and attributes and reason is simple, names can be stolen (how many Mehdis we have in our history!) lastly, its not upto us to stop anything. They have the right to prove islam wrong. Our job is to make our message as clear as possible and that is it. you might find works of Bart Ehrman, Jay R Crook on Christianity more meaningful than William Lane Craig or Anis Shorrosh its innocent to think that one can open the quran and convince someone what is the meaning of Khatim, Noor or similar beliefs. You will be bombarded with evidence from every corner of the world, the root word analysis, sayings of so and so, dreams and Ilhams and what not People will always twist and argue till death to stand on their beliefs. Only the courageous few will come forward and show the strength to say the right thing. All this struggle is for those few people we may find in our path of life