Status Of The Report On The Barking Of The Dogs Of حوأب At Ayesha
وعليكم السلام How is it against Prophet ﷺ or his wife? Rather it’s one of the proof of Prophethood that his prophecy came true.
السلام عليكم 😀 1) How is it new? How does that even make sense? The word most probably used is بدعة, which means invention in religion which she did not do. 2) Yes, the same can be said about these prophesies, which also make zero sense and, therefore, should either be rejected or at least not used. How can somone expect the Prophet to know that his grandson would be martyred and that he still did not tell Muslims to take care of him? Why did Gabriel even tell him that? So that he could grieve? Why would Allah tell him how Ammar was going to die? Doesn’t make any sense. These events had nothing to do with our beloved Prophet’s mission nor anything else. They had zero effect on anything. So, God purposeless told the Prophet these things? Ok, maybe Allah told these things to the Prophet as a “Friend.” But the Prophet told people. Why? No one took any action.These reports do not fit سنة الله, in my current opinion. 3) According to the second report you brought, the Prophet told Ali that he would have a dispute with Ayesha. Why did he not tell the same thing to Ayesha and advise them to always stay united no matter what? 4) Prophecies are prophecies doesn’t cut it. With all due respect, Ali Bhai, it seems like these prophecies are purposeless. The signs of Qiyama are probably not strong reports either but at least they are not purposeless. The Prophet gave us signs to see the Hour draw nearer so that we can correct ourselves before it is too late. The report about Ammar is once again very weak. There was no “rebel” group and noone was “calling to Hell.” Furthermore, Ammar did not call anyone to obey Allah. By the way, how is surrendering to Ali obedience of God? Once again, smells fishy (شيعة influence). And to my limited knowledge, Ammar did not even call towards obedience to Ali. 5) Yes, she wasn’t going to war. Agreed. 😀 I don’t know about you, brother, but کتے بھونکنا in our cultures is very very negative. One just cannot take that in any other way, in my opinion. 6) Agreed. However, some just can’t be interpreted like that, or it is very very hard because the narrators have jumbled up the words or mixed their understanding. There are just so many things which can and did went wrong in these reports and high calibre scholars are aware of them.
السلام علیکم That’s interesting. Thank you for that. I will ان شاء اللہ look into it. Also, what about the جرح on Qais ibn Abi Hazim? That he is منکر الحدیث, by Ali ibn al-Madini.