Quran 33:33 – Context And Historical Background
So, in conclusion, this verse does refer to the Prophet’s wives. It does not refer to ordinary women in general, does it?
Hmm, I see… ‎ ‎Yes, I asked about this verse because….. many scholars I have seen use this verse for other ordinary women as well. They say, “Because she is the Prophet’s wife, it is even more clear that we must follow her example,” and because of this, many scholars say that a woman who does not wear a hijab or burqa is considered tabarruj and in accordance with the above verse. My point is…….how can that be? That’s why I want to find out the context of this verse and what kind of clothing style caused women in the past to be called tabarruj?
This outfit is certainly inappropriate and will undoubtedly lead to minor sins, but since it is worn in a place that is in accordance with local norms and does not lead to major sins, it is acceptable. As for dancing, you also have to look at the context in which it is done. If it is just dancing for an art performance, then it is fine. However, if the dancing is done to seduce men, like strippers in clubs, then it is clearly wrong. As I mentioned above, the issue is not about displaying beauty, but rather how the woman displays her beauty to seduce men or not. Examples such as prostitution or hookers who display their beauty to seduce men into adultery, as well as animals such as female cats in heat, are examples of this. That is my opinion.