Narration Of Sahabi Suwaybit And Nuayman Degrading And Making Fun Of Slaves
I think that you’re confusing slavery with prisoners of war. Hopefully the following thread will help: Discussion 1763
Asalamoalaikum I did mean Prisoners of War, when I said Slavery. That’s a fault on my behalf. I just want to know why this ” ransom ” or ” exchange ” was necessary. If freedom was given within a few coins, it means the Muslims could have freed the POW without taking anything from the POWs. Freedom from ransom comes across as an excuse to keep POWs in their state for no reason but profit. Also, why do POWs have to provide service for their freedom? They should be freed without the need to.
This specific narration can be found in Musnad Ahmad and in Ibn-e-Maja and has been categorized as Daef (weak) because of a weak narrator Zamaa’ bin Saleh. Details can be found in the given links in the footnote [1] . In addition to this, this narration has been narrated by Ibn-e-Shahab Zohri, and Farahi school has recorded some concerns on his narrations in the light of information provided by ulema-e-ilm ur rijal and ulema-e- ilm ul Hadith, which can be read in the following threads under heading: “ Appendix B: The Controversial Personality of Ibn Shihāb Zuhrī “:( Discussion 1740 ) AND under heading “ Appendix A: The Questionable Personality of Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri “:( Discussion 1663 ). ______________________ Footnote [1] : Ibn-e-Maja : https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:3719 Musnad Ahmad : https://al-maktaba.org/book/25794/22388#p1 https://al-maktaba.org/book/25794/22389#p1