Quran 2:285-286 Time Of Revelation
There is no need to refer to any shan-e-Nazul in order to understand the specific application of Quran 9:5 . It is true that it is not described in explicit words, but the context , concomitant factors and the intrinsic indicators in those verses make it clear that al-mushrikin mentioned in those verses related to Muskhrikin of that time and the alif laam used with Mushrikun is that of ‘ ehad ‘. Reading simple translation of those verses make this point clear. Whatever we find in hadith corpus complement this viewpoint of Quran, but the scheme we follow in understaning Quran is from Quran to Hadith and not the other way round. Same is the case with narrations on ‘ Shan-e-Nazul ‘, they are not outrightly rejected, but are referred to and studied in the light of Quran. If the context of Quran demands or refers in some way to see its shan-e-nazul or other historical background or previous divine book , then thsoe sources will be referred. The point here to note is that seqence of understanding Quran shoud not be compromised and Quran should always take precedece on all other supplementary material ( Please see : Discussion 56116 ). Please also refer to the video below from 6:56 to 8:23 https://youtu.be/YUNtNys5KrQ?t=416