Studying Atheism
Any discussions on metaphysical or abstract theories with no basis in scientific reality is irrelevant and not important unless there is an agreement with atheists on who’s God and how, if at all, He interacts with mankind.
No brother, natural selection is random and governed by chance transfer of gene pool that would render an animal fit to survive. There’s no intelligent designer deciding which specie to survive? What’s ur proof there’s an intelligent decision is wiping out certain species and leaving the rest? According to WWF the we r losing upto 0.01-0.1% species every yr. Why this is intelligent or conscious decision making? The number of mammals and birds r reduced by 40-60% since 1970. Which God is deciding that? https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/aug/16/nature-economic-security Yes, how God interacts with creation is also a very important question. No disagreement
Exactly!! When we give up objective reasoning we end up with conjecture Think, how can we prove Allah is the only God and Muhammad SAW is his messenger using metaphysics, palmistry, telepathy, hypnotism, astronomy or dreams?? If we can, then someone else can prove Zeus as the true god and so on and so forth If we can not then who cares if they r true or not or someone believes it or not. If your logic can tell u that universe is so vast so there must be other life forms, so be it. It’s not a proof of aliens etc but conjecture or belief. I or no one has to refute it because it doesn’t affect anything. Windows example is flawed because windows is not self-aware or conscious while humans doing science are Brother, I am well aware of science, its limitations but any discussion about Allah, Muhammad SAW and shariah can not happen without using reasoning of today. Imam Ghazali, Ibn Taimiyyah RA did the same, used philosophy to refute falsehood of their time.