Ruling On The Exiting Of Less Than Excused Amount Of Najasah In Wudu
A person has to assess his situation honsetly and then decide for himself. The guiding principle for relaxation in Ibadah is ‘ Usar ‘ ( undue diffuculty which is over and above the normal difficulty which could be as a result of medical condition or any other genuine reason ). If it is a medical condition or result of incontinence (i.e. Wudu Nullifier which is happening frequently for which a person has no control for something which usually should be under control of a person ); In such instances, one can be considered excused from redoing Wudu everytime this happens. In all such instances, it is an obvious that such a thing which is usually visible when it happens should be visible to the person otherwise, one cannot assume on his own based on mere doubts that his wudu has terminated. Therefore, if the wudu nullifier can be clearly identified and it is none of the conditions mentioned above which could fall under ‘ Usar ‘ then wudu would be considered terminated. In case of sweat as mentioned above (a ssuming that there is no Usar ), it should be ignored, unless it can be clearly identified that soemthing has excreted which is a wudu nullifier. Only in such case, wudu should be redone. Mere doubts, in the absence of clear evidence should be ignored.
The question is still not clarified to me. Is the wudu only invalidated if the traces of najasah are evident, or can be seen or in principle every amount of najasah is sufficient to invalidate the wudu?
I am actually very sure that urethra has been opened and touched with the clothes by it’s inner side, as a result of bumping with the clothes, and it of course has some urinal traces which are remained after urinating. Also sweating usually 100% has some traces of najasah. One can not deny that.