Why Did Muslims Back Then Have Slaves/ Servants?
But sir, taking care of POW did not necessarily mean we had to deem them as slaves. We could have provided them with shelter, food, clothing, without making them ” earn their freedom “. We do not do this practice with Free people in Poverty do we? I had one question regarding this: did the slaves get to keep the money they earned in order to be free, or was that Usurped from them by their master?
Sorry wrong usage of terms. I meant just because a group were POW did not mean we had to “take away their freedom”. What does this even mean? What can they not do, whilst being servants, that they can do once they are free? I’m sorry, for my question I meant that the master did not take ALL the money the servant made, right? Or else he would have needed go start again at square one, defeating the purpose of his labour.