Causes Of Hadith Fabrication
How can the healthy chain of narrators be called healthy if their hadith contradicts Qur’an unless Prophet himself contradicted Qur’an ? They all were aware of the implication of attributing a false thing to Prophet, so if they were pious and had good memory, it is not logically possible for them to attribute something which Prophet did not say. The possibility is that they didn’t understand what Prophet meant to say exactly. So, we need to look at all hadiths on that topic and then judge it. Was Prophet not aware of the fact that his words can be misunderstood, so when he gave a ruling, why wasn’t he clear in his words? Many hadiths like “house fly in the drink” and “apostasy/blasphemy punishment” etc. have been misunderstood .. so why didn’t he use proper words for them ? Also, why didn’t Allah prevent these misinterpreted versions of Islam to be propagated and become mainstream ?
Till we get the project of Ghamidi saab completed, what is the source of knowing what exactly Prophet said ? I am not talking about Sunnah and how the isolated hadiths are not the source of deen.. I am only asking about what is the best way to judge what Prophet said and meant in those isolated hadiths .. even though they are not the source of religion. Can we also get the list of hadiths which form the source of religion, i.e. Sunnah ? If I want to read ONLY the Sunnah, which book I should refer to ?