Multiverse And Cosmological Argument
If someone chooses to ignore all the empirical evidence – both internal and external to our own existence, our faculty of reason and rationality that’s screaming that everything around us is in fact created, as well as traces in all of the known history, then no cosmological argument will stand in their way of denial of God. If one decides to dig deeper into atheism, he will very soon find out that it stands on very thin ice. Majority of physicalist / materialist theories stand on pure imagination. Quran, on the other hand, makes it’s case on the basis of very strong evidence. There’s no harm in studying the cosmological argument, or any other kalam / philosophical theories, but all of these have been strongly criticized by other philosophical ideas. Neither has anything conclusive ever come out of these arguments, nor is there any hope.
The first step is to define rationality. Does rationality mean denial of God then who came up with that idea. If atheists came up with that then that is a bias and a prejudice. Why is my prejudice for God wrong and their prejudice against God right. Who decided that? Then we can quote the number of discoveries made by believers, the inventions by believers. That shows an intellect. It is proof against believers being irrational. If irrationality can produce sciences then rationality is useless for practical purposes.
Thank you very much. I will chk them out.