Ijma And Tawatur In The Context Of Wuzu And Acts Which Nullify It
Yes it does. It is a well known ‘nawaqis’ of Wuzu and doesn’t depend on ahad.
If it does nullify Wudu, why do you have to redo Wudu and not Istinja? That doesn’t make sense
Please could you elaborate
The presence of ijma and tawatur renders the possibility of such a mishap to minimal. The same way it does for Quran and other established history.
And how is quoli tawatur easier to be preserved than amali tawatur? amali tawatur extends to more masses than the quoli tawatur.
“- we have found many such traditions being started and can trace them back to a hadith “I think almost all of them
That’s assuming that the ijma and tawatur wasn’t built on the state synthetically creating it by crushing opposition