Proof For God In A Logically Semantic Presentation
I’m not talking about the premises being true. That is logically irrelevant. It’s about if it is deductively sound. The argument you gave is not true since humans are not dogs. And that was not one of your premises. If it was then it would be true.
I showed you example of fallacy of the Undistributed Middle https://www.thoughtco.com/undistributed-middle-fallacy-1692453 First two premises are two, but wrong conclusion. Humans are dogs is the conclusion not premise. You are committing in my opinion similar fallacy.