Authenticity Of Hadith About Hazrat Fatima (R.A) And Parda
Yes sir I understand what you’re saying But even if we interpret these ahadith in the light of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, we’d still reach the traditional conclusion, no? I mean, none of the above ahadith explicitly contradicts the directives of the Qur’an and The Sunnah.One may as well say that hadith at the top indicates that Khimaar is the to cover the head as well not only the bosom(a question that’s left unanswered by the Qur’an) and “save that what’s normally apparent thereof” doesn’t include the feet. The rest of ahadith , too, are pretty clear about this issue. But as far as I know, the Hanafi school doesn’t consider the feet to be included in the awrah. Is it because these ahadith aren’t authentic? Or is it because there are more authentic ahadith indicating the contrary? I don’t think these hadith contradict the Qur’an and Sunnah, so why do we reject them?
السلام علیکم! Sorry, I forgot to attach the entry from الصحاح. The first line clearly defines عورة.