Was This Loophole For Prostitution Of Slaves Allowed?
@meowmeow Thank you for such an insightful answer. I understand that people were exploiting this and even if it wasn’t legally wrong was it sinful on part of the seller if they were doing this repeatedly? As they are literally a pimp. Or the buyer as well for the obvious intent before hand to buy, use and return. Or the text states that “and who returned his ownership of her to her pimp on the pretext of discontent after intercourse” was this a transfer of ownership without being considered a return. I am just trying to understand if there was sin attached to this specific scenario.