Conclusive Arguments For The Existence Of God
The evidence we present to establish the existence of God beyond a reasonable doubt is first and foremost on the basis of observation and logical inferences thereof which are accessible to scientists and non-scientists alike While concluding this subject, does this mean we’ll observe and present planning, diligence, deep wisdom, meaning, beneficence, creativity, harmony, mathematical order, control in general environment, which is available infront of all of us, and then we can easily conclude the fact that the universe is or, at least, “appears to be” designed and requires explanation, thus it MUST have a creator. We’ll stick to this valid, obvious and logical conclusion until and unless anything in the realm of knowledge can conclusively deny it. am I drawing right conclusive approach to deal with this subject? For example, we came across a running computer in the middle of a desert, we’ll conclude an intelligent mind behind this, in this case, a human being. We’ll believe it was created until and unless we get to know conclusively that it somehow got “poped up” am I right?