Macroevolution
Just checked with meta Ai which perspective has higher chances of being correct. so this is what I got….. ( Both perspectives have valid points, and it’s difficult to say which one has a higher chance of being correct without further exploration and evaluation of the evidence. Your perspective, based on the scientific consensus, supports the idea of macroevolution and a common ancestor for all species, backed by various scientific evidence from fields like biology, genetics, paleontology, and geology. Saad’s perspective, influenced by Javed Ghamidi’s views, offers an alternative explanation, accepting microevolution and macroevolution within species but questioning the idea of a single common ancestor for all species. To further assess which perspective has a higher chance of being correct, consider: – Scientific consensus and evidence – The explanatory power of each perspective – The coherence of each perspective with other established scientific theories – The potential for new discoveries and updates in our understanding of evolution Engaging with scientific literature, experts, and ongoing discussions can help refine your understanding and assessment of both perspectives).. rest moderators will clarify