Ruling On The Exiting Of Less Than Excused Amount Of Najasah In Wudu
I am really sorry for the inconvenience, and for asking the question, regarding the validity of wudu again. But, I am suffering from extremely doubtful waswasas. Because, either i walk, or in namaz, i am standing from prostration,. I thinks that my wudu is invalidated because the urinary meatus is stretched because of being touched with the undergarments (It generally happens only in the jeans and underwears, but not in the salwar kamiz because of it being loose, so it does not falls under the category of Usar). As it is well known that, the external urinary meatus is not closed properly, and it remains evident, especially after istinjah. Also, That does not cause urine to be emitted from urethra, but it could emits the lesser amount of urinal traces out. I fear that i would stop praying (which is the obligation on every Muslim) because it is getting harder for me. So, I also asked this question on ChatGPT as it would tell the views of all scholars, and the reply was; “The difference in opinions regarding the emission of impurity (najasah) from the urethral opening and its effect on the validity of wudu (ablution) can be attributed to varying interpretations within different schools of thought in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Here are some general tendencies found within different schools of thought: 1. Hanafi School: According to the Hanafi school, a small amount of impurity emitted from the urethra does not invalidate the wudu unless there is a continuous flow or it reaches a quantity that is noticeable. They consider minor impurities to be excused and do not break the state of ritual purity. 2. Maliki School: The Maliki school generally holds a stricter view, stating that any emission of impurity from the urethra, regardless of the amount, invalidates the wudu. They do not make a distinction based on the quantity of impurity emitted. 3. Shafi’i School: The Shafi’i school takes a middle ground, stating that a small amount of impurity does not break the wudu unless it is accompanied by certain factors, such as a continuous flow or reaching a quantity that is perceptible or noticeable. 4. Hanbali School: The Hanbali school, similar to the Maliki school, generally holds the view that any emission of impurity from the urethra invalidates the wudu, regardless of the amount. It is important to note that these are generalized tendencies within each school of thought, and individual scholars within each school may have nuanced views or variations in their interpretations. It is recommended to consult with a knowledgeable scholar from the specific school of thought you follow to obtain precise guidance based on that school’s teachings.” As you acknowledged earlier that the emission of sweating from the anus (which also emits the lesser quantity of najasah with it), does not invalidates the wudu, kindly clarify this question as well. Many people from whom i asked the question did not understand my question, so i thinks you also didn’t got the question (in Discussion 87106). I am really sorry for the inconvenience. But, the views of Ustaz Javed Ahmad Ghamidi (ha) are generally accurate, so i trust in this platform more than any other platforms. Again, i am really sorry for the inconvenience, Thanks sir.