What Is Default Ruling In Matters Where There'S No Evidence Of Haram/Halal
@Irfan76 sir but we would be having sin if we know or think that most likely this person will use this gun to do robbery. so in this case we will say it will be Haram to sell him gun. what made it Haram to sell is not the act itself but our knowledge that this thing will most likely or certainly be used by him to do some oppression to others. and we come to this conclusion that he will use it to oppress others for example by evidences like he is a gang member with their associated tattoos, before buying the gun I heard him talking in call “I’m just preparing for our next good loot”. so this suggest his buying is most likely for this purpose. but if we have no knowledge and we stand in middle, don’t know if he will use it or not. no strong evidence to suggest he will do one thing. here we instead of evidence we only have speculations that maybe he will do it maybe he won’t. so here we are required to not go into speculation. and take a step back and only look at the apparent action (which is halal). so the action was basically halal. it would have been Haram if the condition that this man will use it to oppress others, is proved by certainity or most likelohood. but since it was not proved by either means with any evidence we are suppose to not give it any weight to it, which will eventually mean that this thing is halal based on its original basic status of being halal. am I right sir?