Question Regarding Prehistoric Stories In Quran
First of all, thanks for responding to my question, I appreciate it. As I understand you argued that there is enough reason to believe in the divinity of the Quran, based on which we can also accept prehistoric Quranic stories as true. As an argument, it is fair enough. But to prove the divinity of the Quran the Ghamidi’s argument is not convincing enough because of three reasons. A) Some portions of the Quran, like the contents on the Hereafter and prehistoric events, are not verifiable so no one can able to critically assess them therefore this portion is free from criticism. B) People have criticized the portion of the Quran that addresses the modern world phenomena. For example, permitting of beating one’s wife, age human, and creation of Earth before the heavens. For finding more criticism see this link: https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/contradictions-and-inconsistencies-in-the-quran/ C) The third reason is that the interpreters of the Quran always change their interpretations to evade criticism. For example, the old interpreters used to say the Quran says the world is static but when science proved that it is not static then interpreters changed their interpretation and started saying that the Quran doesn’t refer the earth as static rather it implies that the earth is stable and not shaky.