Quran Authenticity
With all due respect I think brother Farhan’s question is based on a misunderstanding of how historical evidence and proof work. The principle he’s referring to is “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” Just because we don’t have independent historical records of Prophet Noah (Nuh, AS) doesn’t mean he didn’t exist. Many ancient events and figures are not documented outside religious or oral traditions, yet that doesn’t mean they are myths. The Quran is not a history book; it conveys truth in a way that goes beyond just physical evidence. Faith is not always dependent on external proof, especially when dealing with events from thousands of years ago. Lack of archaeological or historical records does not make something untrue especially when it comes to figures from early human history, where records were scarce. So, the Quran remains a “proven book” in the sense that its message, consistency, and impact remain unmatched. Its truth is not dependent on whether modern historians have records of every past event. Allah knows best