Fear Around Touching To Be Mother In Law, Hurmat-E-Musahrat
@Irfan76 and sir there are a few sayings mentioned by hanafi scholars Ibn Abi Shaybah narrated in al-Musannaf (3/479-480) with his isnaads that ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) undressed his slave woman, then one of his sons asked to marry her, and he said: She is not permissible for you. ‎ ‎It was narrated from ‘Amr ibn Shu‘ayb, from his father, from his grandfather, that he undressed one of his slave women, then one of his sons asked to marry her and he said: She is not permissible for you. And some riwayah associated with prophet that says in meaning that if a person has seen the inside of vagina of a woman then he shouldn’t marry her daughter or mother. Sir what is the reality of these sayings? Lastly sir, in surah nisa 23. The words used are “ila dakhaltu.. ” Now what does it mean? Some scholars say the full act of sexual relations, some say it means act of intimacy (which can be of the low level also, such as touch), and ghamidi Sahab used the word khalwat… So what does the word mean in this context and what does ghamidi Sahab mean by “khalwat”? Does he include touching also in it? Or just the final act of sex?
As told before. This is a matter of ijtihad. If You choose to extend it, you will apply it to minor details, if not then it will stay with intercourse only.
@Irfan76 sir can you please guide me that if these Athaar are authentic then what was the reason and evidence behind their such saying? And what is the evidence on the other side? And which side has stronger evidence? Can you teach me about this lesson sir
It is only physical relation of a man in every case that makes a woman haram to his father or son.
Ok. Now you have different opinions, you can adopt any one of them