Unfair Life Leading To Unfair Test Among People
You mentioned that some people may appear to suffer more or less depending on their endurance, and that we cannot judge hardship from the outside.But isn’t endurance itself something a person is given?For example, I myself have faced many difficulties in life — situations that dragged me to my limits. Yet somehow, I always managed to get through them. I don’t know how, but I naturally tend to have an optimistic outlook. I’m not saying this to brag — I’m genuinely confused.I’ve seen other people around me who cannot move forward from their pain. They remain stuck, keep crying over their situations, or sometimes even harm others because they never developed emotional resilience — especially those who had toxic or traumatic childhoods.So my question is: if resilience, emotional stability, and optimism are themselves unequal gifts, then how is moral accountability measured fairly?If two people face hardship, but one has the inner strength to recover and the other does not — and that strength was not chosen by either of them — then how is reward purely merit-based?And what about someone who, due to severe childhood trauma, genuinely never developed healthy coping mechanisms and ends up harming others out of emotional damage? How is that evaluated?I sometimes even feel that maybe my path was easier internally — that I always “figured out a way” — and therefore I may receive less reward unless I do something exceptional. While someone else who simply survives their broken reality might be rewarded more just for existing as they are.How does justice operate when even internal psychological tools are unequally distributed?