Mustache
Are they symbol of arrogance for every time period?
My confusion is about the criterion. You mentioned two reasons: arrogance and food getting involved. Arrogance is clearly context-based and intention-based. The food issue also seems context-based, because hygiene, habits, and even feelings of disgust differ from person to person. Disgust itself is a subjective human emotion, not an objective moral category—many people do not feel disgust at all if cleanliness is maintained.So my question is: does something become religiously disallowed simply because some people find it unpleasant, or is the ruling conditional on context and neglect of cleanliness? If both reasons are context-dependent, then how can the ruling be treated as a fixed “must-not” instead of guidance tied to circumstances?From what I understand, Islam generally gives principles and leaves their application to context, rather than declaring neutral things impermissible in all cases. So is the moustache issue meant to be advisory and contextual, or is it being treated as absolutely prohibited regardless of hygiene, intention, or culture?