Scientific Errors In Quran About Semon ..?
No, it’s clearly the ejaculation of sperm. As for it being between the backbone viscera, this was the belief of the people at that time. The Quran does use unscientific facts to teach moral/philosophical lessons, l have given two more examples in my answer. Even if we take your explanation , the food of the male sperm in the testicle ( or female ovary ) is blood and this isn’t ejaculated. The blood is ultimately pumped from the heart , so should we link the semen to the heart (chest) as well ? The Arabs at that time had many misunderstanding of scientific facts and the Quran didn’t bother to correct them as this would give them one more reason to reject the Quran. The Quran instead uses the unscientific facts to impart moral/religious teachings. If you accept this methodology of understanding the Quran, you will never feel troubled by the Quran using unscientific facts or legends You should also have the same perspective in mind when the Quran addresses popular legends , for eg the Gates of Alexander. Now, we know this story was falsely attributed to Alexander the Great, referred to as the two horned one in a syriac text dating back to 629 or 630 AD. This legend was spread all over the middle east ( or atleast northern Arabia ) to the point the people questioned the Prophet on its content. The Quran didn’t bother to falsify the legend, it infact gave it’s own unique twist to it by describing dhul Qarnain as a righteous king.