Existence Of God Is Plausible But Is It True?
I never said that “seeing” God is necessary. We don’t see atoms and molecules but we infer their existence from our physical models. But atoms and molecules are not just logical inferences as is the case with God. There is a mathematical description which predicts certain numbers and those numbers are confirmed by experiments. They match exactly! Such level of rigour is not present in religious arguments and by nature can’t be present. Even gravity ( as you have mentioned ) is not just a label we have put on some phenomenon, we have exact mathematical laws which predict numbers and you can even test those numbers at home using a ball, an inclined plane, a ruler and a stop watch. On the other hand God is purely a plausible logical inference which could be wrong. If plausibility was the sole criteria then QM would have never been discovered. Coming to your last point that all this is a test. I think this analogy is also flawed because in a test the participants know that they are being tested. Here, the existence of the test itself is under question.
There is fundamental issue in your argument. You need to understand the premise of science and and scientific experimentation. Science deal with material world. Also, inorder to experimentally observe anything, there should be change in some sort of properties of material eg dipole, amplitude momentum, contrast etc. I dont know any technique which can observe absolute phenomenon. Everything is relative to some other property. For observing God you should have known set of properties to compare it with. Another propblem is Science philosophy donot allow meta physical explanation. Otherwise this can happen to your work https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/08/creatorgate-how-a-study-on-hands-sparked-a-scandal-about-science-god-and-ethics-in-publishing/ Since, God is metaphysical phenomenon so you cannot do experimentation. You can read about philosophy of science elsewhere. Can you show me any thing which has a begining and come out of nothing? Answer to this question is your empirical evidence. About your comments on test, read little bit about epistemology of testimony and threads link given above. Thats how we know this life is a test.
@Ahsan Jalal. I will definitely go through this paper , Thankyou for sharing it. Would you agree to this statement I made earlier ” God is a very plausible explanation of most facts of the universe but it is not the only explanation and it can be wrong” ??