Virgin Birth Of Jesus AS
I did not write this so I apologise for any disrespectful tone
Also if the angel blew into maryam عليها السلام then why doesn’t it say فنفخنا فيها but فيه And some say that maryam عليها السلام was married at the time of the birth of Jesus عليه السلام . And that احصنت فرخها indicates this. So when the angel asked her she said that she wasn’t ever touched but that doesn’t mean that later the birth and conception was natural.
Another argument people give is that the ruh would be blown anyway since babies have the ruh blown into them. And that maryam عليها السلام was only fearful because the people would assume she had done zina. But actually, just like the birth of yahya and Ismael, there must have been some physical relationship that took place. They say that maryam عليها السلام actually got married- and then the father went out of the picture for some reason. @Irfan76
They say the reason maryam عليها السلام didn’t say anything was because the Jews were going to accuse her whatever she said
So did the nafkh e rooh that the angels did to maryam عليها السلام create isa عليه السلام or did it give him the insani shakhsiyat?
@Irfan76 unless this is just left to history. Because if we accept that she was married then the same way zakariya عليه السلام had a son (there must have been some physical relation perhaps) then maryam عليها السلام could have also had this relation. But the Jews thought that what she did was so bad because she had violated some rule of the temple. (I’m just covering all bases of questions that people ask about the virgin birth as they think the Quran doesn’t make it fully clear as in ‘don’t you remember the time Jesus عليه السلام was born from no father?’)
Read the whole anecdote of birth of Isa in Quran it tells she was unmarried when she gave birth to Isa. Reiterated. Quran is supposed to correct the previous misconceptions of they are of that importance. Qurankc description is in line with the miraculous birth of Isa without father. Now the arguments are circulating. You may ponder upon the case having both argumenys before you.