Hadith Contradicting Quran's Stance That No Soul Will Bear Burden Of Other Soul
The principle is very simple and right in accordance with Justice and Quran – If someone has influenced the other person or generations afterward with his good deeds in a way that others do that because of his example, then he shall also be rewarded for their good deeds. For example, a person famous for his charity work influences others to do the same, he will have a share in their reward as well. If someone has influenced the other person or generations afterward with his bad deeds in a way that others do that because of his example, then he shall also be given a share from their bad deeds. For example, a person who becomes a murderer by getting influenced by a known serial killer, then that serial killer will have to bear the consequences of the effects of his bad deeds by having a share in the sins of that new murderer. And if someone starts a completely new thing like committing a new crime for the first time, performing a good deed by giving it a new attractive form ( or reviving a forgotten Sunnah ) or inventing something new in religion (‘ biddah ‘), then by the same logic, the innovator must get reward or face consequences for the effects created because of his innovation, which is being followed by generations afterward. When Quran says that ‘ No soul shall bear the burden of another soul ‘, the burden here already includes the sins and their corresponding effects as well, because these are not two entirely independent things, one leads to another and hence both constitute that burden to be borne. Justice also entails that effects of one’s deeds must also be taken into account in determining the gravity of consequences or rewards that one must face. And all of this is subject to of course the general principle of intention , knowledge , age , circumstances , resources and environment in which a particular deed is being committed in accordance with Quran 5:48 .
And a thing “”Did the person committing Zina already know that it is a sin and he already had every intention of committing it? or did I actually influence him to commit that Sin? if it’s the latter then I will have a share in that sin too because I influenced him; and I cannot simply get away by saying that it was not my intention to influence him because it is an obvious reality which cannot be negated which we all human beings know that our actions have consequences and simetimes those consequences are in the form of an influence on others.”” “And all of this is subject to of course the general principle of intention, knowledge, age, circumstances, resources and environment in which a particular deed is being committed in accordance with Quran 5:48.” Above you said intention will be seen if a person have intention to mislead then it understandable but when there is no intention to mislead or that other person follow be surly will then he gonna be responsible otherwise because you said he can’t say just i didn’t have the intention but if actually he was telling the truth he doesn’t have the intention then what??