Causing Others To Do A Sin By Doing A Sin, Or A Generic Halal
“and you are not directly assisting to maintain Shirk” to maintain Shirk, you mean that if someone helps the other person with intention to help him achieve shirk, right? like if I drop someone to a place where I know he’ll go there and do somethings halal but also something’s Haram like shirk. but if intention is not to help him in achieving shirk but rather help him in achieving that which is halal, then it’s no problem. right?
@Irfan76 sir actually Ghamidi Sahab while explaining the lecture about the part of ayah where “la taqrabu ” is written. he told that a person himself has to apply this la taqrabu scenario on himself and he has to look for himself that whatever things that which if he does will suck him towards Zina in a way that is difficult to break out from it’s shackles and there’s a high risk of falling in Zina. he further gave an example, that a person who goes in a bus and he finds out there only one seat left, which in beside a lady. and he knows that if he goes there then he’ll start getting sucked in towards Zina. actually this example made me think that if a normal mundane act of sitting beside a woman can become prohibited based on if it will suck him towards Zina or not. if it does then it’s “la taqrabu” , if it doesn’t suck him into Zina with a strong impulse then it’s not ‘la taqrabu ‘ for him.(if a person knows that he won’t get strong, difficult to control impulses towards Zina because the lady sitting is quite ugly. then it won’t be “la taqrabu” for him if he goes there and sit). actually this made me think that even normal mundane acts can come under “la taqrabu” in such cases. so that’s why I was confused, if Rajesh will be getting sin for merely eating food as well? because he always thanks his false god in a prayer, after eating. eating causes him to do shirk immediately my confusion starts here that, if something which is mundane, like eating food. because this thing immediately causes him to do shirk (just like the man on bus, if it sucks him towards Zina. then a mundane act of sitting beside on a public transport will become prohibited for him in that case) then what if this mundane act of Rajesh which immediately causes him to do shirk, becomes a prohibited act for him? and if it really does become a prohibited action for him (action of eating) then I would be sinful for if I invite him over and I have an active wish/want in my heart that he comes to my house and eats my food. this thing maybe sinful under the category of “wishing/wanting the other person to do a sinful act (mundane act of eating which is now sinful for Rajesh because it causes him to do shirk immediately, just like the man in bus) Sir can you please clear my confusion? what is the thing that I’m missing out? pleas help me
@Irfan76 okay sir so any direct cause of a major sin can be a sin based on Sadd e Zariya. like touching a woman with lust will be sin in itself. right? which can be forgiven if the Zina didn’t happen. but if Zina happens then lustful touch will also be counted in sin. but in above example if Riya kari happens then the sin won’t be counted back from marriage. am I understanding both aspects rights? that lustful touch will be sin itself but marriage won’t be sin itself in the above example. right sir?