Historical Objection: The Lack Of Evidence For David And Solomon's Empire
Archeological pieces of evidence are secondary and supportive to history, not that history depends upon them. In history, the most authentic source is authentic reporting when it is based on the consensus of a community. Histories are the work of communities. if a community is agreed upon a happening which is not a singular incident but a public event, it is its own proof. On the very basis, we accept the existence of Socrates, Plato, Ceasar, Hannibal, etc before or without we find any archeological evidence about them.