Existential Difference Among Humans
Distinction is between capacity and active awareness. Religion says the potential to recognize God, morality, and accountability exists within human nature. But having a capacity does not mean it will always be consciously activated. For example, every human being has the capacity for deep moral reasoning, yet many people live without ever seriously examining their moral framework. The potential exists, but it may remain dormant.Another factor is environment and distraction. A person absorbed in routine, comfort, survival, or social conditioning may never pause long enough to question existence. Psychological stability does not necessarily mean existential resolution. Sometimes it simply means the person has adapted to a certain worldview and feels no urgency to go beyond it.Also, not feeling anxiety about the Hereafter does not automatically mean the inner moral compass is absent. Some people suppress existential thoughts because they are uncomfortable. Others genuinely find sufficient meaning in worldly structures and stop there. But that does not logically negate the possibility that deeper questions remain beneath the surface.From a religious framework, the test is not whether every human constantly feels existential tension. The test is whether the signs, moral awareness, and reason available to a person are sufficient for accountability. Reflection is encouraged, but not everyone engages with it equally.In fact, the very fact that this question arises in the human mind suggests that the capacity for transcendental inquiry is real. Some ignore it. Some explore it. That difference itself becomes part of human responsibility.So the phenomenon you described does not necessarily contradict the religious view. It may simply show that human awareness unfolds differently depending on exposure, environment, personality, and choices.