Exile Of Non Muslims From Arabia
As we discussed in “no compulsion” thread, it is immaterial if completion of proof is done.. as it is the Muslim view .. forcing people to accept Islam or be killed .. is certainly compelling them. Also, if it is so clear, that only wicked can deny it, then what is the problem in applying it now ? Are we saying that at present, the truth of Islam is not clear ? What about the people who deny the current Islam ? Is current Islam not so convincing as it was in the time of Prophet ? When Prophet wrote letters to other kings, he did not explain them the truth.. just sent them letters and threatened them to accept Islam or be killed. Now, if letters can work as proof, then what is the problem of today ? Today, we know about Prophet more than what those kings might have known.. today we have the best scholars, and medium of information .. almost every detail about Prophet and Qur’an is available today.. what valid excuse does a person today have which he can use to deny Prophet ? In 7th century America, the native Americans, might not even have ANY idea who Prophet Muhammad was .. so what about their completion of proof ?