Macroevolution
You need comprehensive evidence to prove evolution happened. There first premise starts as : “a & b are similar hence they were same at a point of time but due to natural processes they look different”. But this a just a mere possibility. We can also claim they just have a common designer which makes sense because god wants to prove monotheism. Just image a theory which has foundations this weak. It just can induce laughter in the ones who know. Also look around, every organism has all types of organs, everything performing their functions— vital and minor. How come you never see a feature without any function. Why don’t you find any harmful features? Is survival of fittest this perfect. It’s not! They used to say we have vestigial organs, now when one by one their functions are being discovered evolution are on a verge of complete collapse, but only in the minds that know. For me evolution just proves how predictable are we as a whole. The proportion & the composition of the thought of the humans. Debate them with basic :nothing other than (like muslim traditionalists) consensus of understanding is their answer. Consciously or subconsciously they always prove their bais.