Hassan Ilyas Sahabs Post On Tawatur
Your question is not clear.
My point is how do we know the deen documented by Fiquah was based on ijma and tawatur? There is at least a century wide gap between the prophet (SA) era and the imams and Islam had spread in many countries – that makes it hard for anyone to verify ijma and tawatur during those days with limited communication means.
1. A muslims state introduced a variant of a religious ritual e g. fajr prayers 2. People questioned it. 3. The State explained it as a ‘correction’ in the practice corrupted over the years and provides a hadith to support it. 4. People accept it 5. The next generations start defending it as ijma n tawatur by rejecting hisotrical evidence for bing ‘khaber e wahid. This has happened in Malaysia for fajr prayers and the same thing must have happened when state insisted imam Malik to write his fiqha book so that ‘immut can unite on a single way of practicing islam’. The very motive of introducing fiqha was to eliminate the variants of practices that was popular in different parts of the muslim world or communities. The ijma and tawatur had already corrupted for some reasons and there was no way to correct it except for whatever ahathis were available at that time. Later it became a new ijma n tawatur and clericS like sir Ghamidi are trying to restore it to its original form and this generation is defending it as a deviation from the mainstream or ijma n tawatur.