Hadith And The Sources Of Religion
Okay so, this is what I understand from your explanation and my prior knowledge. There are 3 types of ahadith: Hadees e Qauli, Hadees e Faili and Hadees e Taqreri. The sayings of the Prophet – Sunnah Qawliyyah/Hadith. The actions of the Prophet – Sunnah Al Filiyya. Sunnah Taqrīriyyah, practices prevailing at the time of the Prophet which he did not oppose or prohibit. Reference to above: https://guides.law.columbia.edu/c.php?g=1221841&p=9280464 The actions of prophet are to be divided into two parts: Religious and Personal. All the religious actions are to be followed regardless as they are the SUNNAH. All the personal actions are personal, one can adopt or refuse depending upon his likeness or wishes. It is better to adopt. The Sunnah Taqririyah are those actions which happened in front of him and he didnot say a word regarding them. One time I listened to a lecture of Ghamidi Sahib, in which he explained an event in Madinah. He told, that Hazrat hamza was in a gathering in which he was drinking and there were women/ or there was a women who was dancing and there was music. Hazrat Ali came and tried to stop this in which Hazrat hamza murdered the she camel of Hazrat ali. Prophet came later and he objected on all the actions that happened there, except for the objection on the music. I dont remember the video, else I would have posted that too. Please correct me if i am wrong. Such events maybe too classified into religious actions or personal. The Hadees e Qawli are the sayings of prophet. Just as for example, grow your beards and shorten your moustache. Now, that is where my dispute lies. How does one identify that these particular hadees qawli is just a time being command from the leader of the muslims at that time, or it is a command for all the muslim generations to come? There are alot of hadith that confuse me and they usually fall into the category of this hadees e qawlii. How does one reconcile with this? Maybe prophet gave such commands and allah actually wanted those to implemented as the religion but as we progressed, the history was lost? How does one come to a final conclusion?