Multiverse And Cosmological Argument
What was Ghazali’s response to inifinte regress?
Causality: Nothing comes from nothing. I understand Ghazali would limit causation to explain the universe because to him infinite regress is illogical and absurb idea but then he would not explain what caused God? If you are going to suggest God is timeless, has no beginning etc. etc. “what is the source of this knowledge”? You better not get into scriptures to define God. My point: Kalam’s cosmological argument (all variants) is “fiction” – It has no bases to stop/limit causation to universe only and treat the “primary mover” differently.