Strength Of The Argument For The God’s Existence
You mentioned that the coincidence argument is speculativebut how can we conclusively dismiss it when there is neither solid proof for God’s existence nor for His non-existence? While the design argument affirms that there is order and structure in the universe, couldn’t it also be argued that the natural laws of the universe themselves are responsible for this order and structure? I am not denying the presence of design in the universe, but how can we determine whether this design points to a Creator (God) or is simply the result of the natural laws of the universe? Without solid evidence that decisively proves one argument over the other, how can we declare the coincidence argument to be invalid or inferior to the design argument?