The Understanding Of Biblical Prohibition Of Images
@Irfan76 sir what if it’s said that in Ahadith the concession was given about keeping pictures and not making them, and biblical prohibition is about making them. And even sir like the text in the translation of bible is just generally mentioning not to make images. And sir coming to the point of surah Araf, if we come to know that the prohibition of image is actually there, then wouldn’t doing it automatically come under ‘Ithm’ ? That Quranic teachers translate into ‘Sin’? Sir also a few things came into my mind that somehow make it a little clear that in Islam images are not fully prohibited. Like the fact that in bible the text that indicate images prohibition say that nothing like that in sky or land or sea is to be made, without distinguishing animate or inanimate object but we see in a Hadith that angel jibraeel saying prophet to cut a head of an image so that it looks like a tree, it means turning it into a form of tree was suggested. Secondly, that even if we say that in bible it may be possible that all images are prohibited previously then the same attitude or injuction would have been also renewed and passed on to the Ummah to prophet by Ijma and tawattur. That separately making images is also a sin. Even if things were prohibited or injunctions were made in previous prophet’s shariah then Prophet Muhammad would have also passed it on as a separate injuction, am i right sir? Am i right about these points?