itions Nos
111150 151 180 205 210 220226 270 271 346 352 355 403 396 398 599 541 543 626 635 639 661 687 692 and 75877 154 178 571 574 600 603 605 610 611257221 and 1134 113477
1055 Under Article 32 of the Constitution A K Sen section C Banerjee Y section Chitale K K Sinha section K Sinha Pradeep Hajela section K Verma A K Srivastava M P Jha C K Ratnaparkhi B N Lala Surajdeo Singh D P Mukherjee and A K Ganguli for the Petitioners in WPs
Nos 111 150 151 154 178 610 611 661 180 270 271 599 220 226 205 210 396 398 and 600 of 1977
H M Seervai Kamal Nayan Choubey A K Srivastava B P Singh and Bimal Kumar Sinha for the Petitioners in WP Nos 237 571 574 603 605 355 346 of 1977
D Goburdhan for the Petitioners in WP Nos
687 692 635 639 352 and Respondent No 12 in WP Nos 150 15177
A K Sen section C Bannerjee Y section Chitale section B Sanyal A K Banerjee and A K Nag for the Petitioners in WP Nos
626 541 543 and Respondent No 15 in WP 15477
section V Gupte section N Kacker U R Lalit section P Nayar R N Sachthey and Gobind Mukhoty for the Respondents Nos 1 9 12 in WP No 111 RR 1 7 11 in WP Nos
150 151 RR 1 8 to 12 in WP
154 RR
17 in WP
178 RR
17 in WPs
610 611 RR
156  8 in WP
661 RR 1  7 in WP Nos 270 271 RR 1  7 in WP in 599 RR 1 8 9 12  15 in WPs
Nos 571 574 RR 1 8 13  16 in WP No 603
129 in WP 605RR1210111415 in WP
355 RR 1 8 12 in WP 346 RR 1 3 5 8 9 in WP No 626 RR 1 6 10  14 in WP
541 RR
1 5  9 in WP
543 RR 1 8  12 and 15 in WP
758 RR 1 7 in WP
257 RR
17 in WPs
220 and 226 RR
18 in WPs
205 210 RR 18 in WP
600 RR 1 3 11 15 in WP 403 RR 1 9  10 in WP No 18077
Lal Narain Sinha U P Singh Shambhu Nath Jha and U section Prasad for the Respondents Nos 2 8 in WP Nos 111 2 7 in 154 2 6 in 610 611 2 4 7  8 in 661 2 8 in 180 2 6 10 12 in 270 271 2 6 and 10 13 in 599 2 7 in 571 574 2 7 14 15 17 20  23 in 603 2 7 in 605 3 8 12 13 16 18 in 335 2 6 in 687 692 2 6 in 635 637 2 6 in 352 2 6 7  10 in 626 2 5 11 13 in 541 6 8 in 543 2 6 in 75877 2 7 13 14  16 in 257 2 6 in 220 and 226 2 6 13 14 in 205 210 2 7 in 600 2 6 in 638 639 2 4 to 10 in 40377
Mr P section Khera for Intervener No 1 in WP
11177
section K Verma for the Intervener No 2 in WP
11177
A P Chatterjee and G section Chatterjee for Respondents 2  6 in WPs
150 151  2 to 6 in 396 39877
M P Jha for the Petitioner in WP
No 75877
1056 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHANDRACHUD C J
This is a group of 61 Writ Petitions under article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Act 67 of 1976 on the ground that it is violative of the provisions of articles 14 191f 191 g and 31 of the Constitution
For understanding the basis of that challenge it will be enough to refer to the broad facts of two representative groups of petitions
The facts of writ petitions 270 and 271 of 1977 are by and large typical of cases in which the petitioners claim to be lessees of coal mines while the facts of writ petition 257 of 1977 are typical of cases in which the petitioners claim to be lessees of composite mines containing alternate seems of coal and fireclay
Most of the facts are undisputed and only a few of them are in controversy
In writ petitions 270 and 271 of 1977 petitioner No 1 claims to be the sole proprietor of SD Coal Company  which is engaged in coal business and coal mining operations
Petitioner No 2 is said to be the agent of the company
Both the surface and underground rights in Mouza Bundu in the District of Hazaribagh Bihar previously belonged to the Raja of Ramgarh from whom or whose successors in interest the South Karanpura Coal Co Ltd appears to have obtained a lease of 242 Bighas of coal bearing lands in Mouza Bundu called the Bundu Colliery 
After the enactment of the Bihar Land Reforms Act 30 of 1950 all rights of tenure holders landlords and Zamindars including the rights in mines and minerals vested in the State of Bihar but by virtue of section 10 of that Act subsisting leases of mines and minerals in any estate or tenure became leases under the State Government
It is alleged that on 12th June 1975 the South Karanpura Coal Co Ltd entered into an agreement with the section D Coal Company or prospecting developing raising and selling coal from the Bundu Colliery and that on the strength of that agreement petitioner No 1 was put in possession of the entire area of 242 Bighas of coal bearing land
The section D Coal Company is stated to have made large investments in the colliery and to have started paying rents and royalty to the State of Bihar
The petitioners have cited various facts and figures in support of their contention that they have been in working possession of the coal mine area in question and that they were entitled to remove nearly 30000 tonnes of coal raised by them at a heavy cost
It appears that in a proceeding under section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code the Sub divisional Magistrate Sadar Hazaribagh had made the rule absolute against the South Karanpura Coal Co Ltd as well as the section D Coal Company on the ground that 1057 the State Government had taken over the Bundu Colliery
But in CR Case No 18318W of 1975 the High Court of Calcutta is stated to have set aside the order of the State Government cancelling the lease of petitioner 1 in respect of the Bundu Colliery
Since that lease stands terminated under the Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Act 1976 the petitioners have filed writ petitions to challenge the validity of that Act
On the factual aspect the contention of the State of Bihar is that the lease of the Bundu Colliery which was held by Ms South Karanpura Coal Co Ltd was terminated by the Bihar Government on November 24 1975 on account of the violation of Rule 37 of the Mineral Concession Rules 1960 and that actual possession of the colliery was taken by the State Government on November 26 1975 prior to the coming into force of the Amendment Act of 1976
In writ petition No 257 of 1977 the petitioner Nirode Baran Banerjee made an application dated September 17 1966 for the grant of a mining lease in respect of fireclay covering an area of 164060 acres of the Hesalong Colliery
On September 19 1966 he made a similar application in respect of the same area for a coal mining lease
These applications were deemed to have been rejected since the State Government did not pass any order thereon within the prescribed period
In a Revision application preferred by the petitioner the Central Government directed the State Government to consider the petitioner s application for the grant of a mining lease in respect of fireclay
The dispute relating to the petitioner s application for a coal mining lease was brought to the Supreme Court as a result of which the Central Government on April 1 1972 directed the State Government to grant a coal mining lease to the petitioner
On October 17 1973 a formal lease was executed by the State of Bihar in favour of the petitioner in respect of both coal and fireclay
The lease was registered on October 18
According to the petitioner the Hesalong Colliery in respect of which he holds the mining lease for coal and fireclay is situated in an interior area of the hilly portion of the District of Hazaribagh which has its own peculiar nature trait and character
The reserves of coal in the area are said to be in isolated small pockets and are not sufficient for scientific or economical development in a co ordinated and integrated manner
The coal is ungraded and is not required to be transported by rail
On the composite nature of the mine the petitioner has made a specific averment in paragraph 6 of his writ petition to the following effect 1058 The coal and fireclay deposits in the said area are so mixed up that one cannot work either for extraction of coal or for extraction of fireclay without disturbing each of the said two minerals
The deposits are such that at one layer there is coal the next layer is fireclay the other layer is coal the next layer is again fireclay and so on
In paragraph 15 of his writ petition the petitioner has stated that in the Hesalong Mines the deposit of fireclay is spread over the entire area of 164060 acres in the first layer and just beneath that there is a deposit of coal in the second layer so on and so forth
According to the petitioner it is absolutely impossible to carry on mining operations in coal without disturbing the fireclay and any such disturbance and inadvertent extraction of either coal or fireclay by different lessees if the composite lease is split up will amount to unauthorise mining
The petitioner contends that he employs about 9000 workers has invested a huge amount for making the colliery workable and that a large amount of coal which was lying exposed and unprotected was ready for despatch
Since his composite lease too was in jeopardy under the Amendment Act he filed a writ petition in this Court to challenge the validity of the Act contending in addition that the Act is not applicable to composite mines having alternate layers of fireclay and coal
Some of the petitioners had filed writ petitions in the High Courts under article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of the Amendment Act of 1976
Rules were issued in those petitions and interim orders were passed under which the status quo was maintained on certain terms and conditions
After the passing of the 42nd Constitution Amendment Act the High Courts became incompetent to grant any relief in those petitions whereupon writ petitions were filed in this Court
The petitions were argued on behalf of the petitioners by Shri A K Sen Shri H M Seervai Shri Y section Chitale Shri B K Sinha Shri D Goburdhan and Shri A K Nag
The Attorney General argued in support of the validity of the impugned Act and so did the Solicitor General appearing on behalf of the Union of India
Shri Lal Narain Sinha and Shri A P Chatterjee argued respectively on behalf of the State of Bihar and the State of West Bengal
Shri P section Khera and Shri section K Verma appeared on behalf of the interveners
Before examining the contentions advanced before us by the various learned counsel it will be useful to trace briefly the history of laws bearing on the working of mines and exploitation of minerals 1059 the taking over of management and the nationalisation of mines and finally the termination of certain leases under the impugned Act
According to India 1976 Publications Division Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Government of India coal mining was first started at Raniganj West Bengal in 1774
Coal is an important mineral as a source of energy and in India it constitutes a prime source of energy
On the attainment of independence the importance of coal to industrial development was realised by the Planners and the problems of the coal industry were identified by the Planning Commission in its report on the First Five Year Plan
The Fifth Plan provided for a production target of 135 million tonnes of coal by 1978 79 which amounted to an increase of 57 million tonnes from the level of production of 779 million tonnes at the end of the Fourth Five Year Plan
In 1950 after coal mining was stepped up the production was 32 million tonnes
In 1974 75 it reached a record figure of 884 million tonnes
The overall reserves of coal both coking and non coking were estimated in 1976 at 8095 crore tonnes
But howsoever high the coal reserves may be they are not inexhaustible which underlines the need for a planned development of the natural resources
The reckless and unscientific methods of mining which were adopted by most of the colliery owners without regard to considerations of conservation of the mineral and safety and welfare of workers led the Parliament to pass various legislations on the subject in the light of its accumulated experience
The coking coal mines were nationalised in 1972 and the non coking coal mines were nationalised in the following year
The production of coal in the country is now almost completely controlled by the public sector with the exception of isolated pockets wherein reserves are not sufficient for scientific and economical development and the production is consumed locally
The only important mines which are not nationalised are the captive coking coal mines of the two private sector Steel Companies coking coal being a vital ingredient in the production of Steel
The production of coal in the public sector is organised through three companies the Coal Mines Authority Ltd the Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and the Singareni Collieries Company Ltd A holding company Coal India Limited was formed in 1975 incorporating the Coal Mines Authority the Bharat Coking Coal and the Coal Mines Planning and Design Institute as separate Divisions besides other subsidiaries
Entry 23 List II Schedule VII of the Constitution read with article 2463 confers legislative power on the State legislatures in respect of 1060 Regulation of mines and mineral development but that power is subject to the provisions of List I with respect to regulation and development under the control of the Union
Entry 54 List I enables Parliament to acquire legislative power in respect of Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest
Entry 24 List II relates to Industries subject to the provisions of entries 7 and 52 of List I
Entry 7 List I relates to Industries declared by Parliament by law to be necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war
Entry 52 List I enables Parliament to acquire legislative power in respect of Industries the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest
The Industries Development and Regulation Act 65 of 1951 which came into force on May 8 1952 contains a declaration in section 2 that it was expedient in the public interest that the Union should take under its control the industries specified in the First Schedule
Item 21 of the First Schedule comprises coal lignite coke and their derivatives  under the heading Fuels 
The Act provides for the establishment of a Central Advisory Council and Development Councils registration and licensing of industrial undertakings the assumption of management or control of industrial undertakings by the Central Government control of supply distribution and price of certain articles etc
The Mines Act 35 of 1952 which came into force on July 1 1952 was passed by the Parliament in order to amend and consolidate the law relating to the regulation of labour and safety in mines
That Act was evidently passed in the exercise of power under Entry 55 List I Regulation of labour and safety in mines and oil fields
The Mines and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 67 of 1957 which came into force on June 1 1958 was passed in order to provide for the regulation of mines and the development of minerals under the control of the Union
Section 2 of that Act contains a declaration that it was expedient in the public interest that the Union should take under its control the regulation of mines and the development of minerals to the extent provided in the Act
The Act provides inter alia for general restrictions on undertaking prospecting and mining operations the procedure for obtaining prospecting licences or mining leases in respect of lands in which the minerals vest in the Government the rule making power for regulating the grant of prospecting licences and mining leases special powers of 1061 Central Government to undertake prospecting or mining operations in certain cases and for development of minerals
There was a lull in legislative activity in regard to the enactment of further regulatory measures for controlling mines and minerals
The Coking Coal Mines Emergency Provisions Ordinance 12 of 1971 was passed on October 16 1971 It was replaced by the Coking Coal mines Emergency Provisions Act 64 of 1971 which received the President s assent on December 23 1971 but was given retrospective operation from the date of the Ordinance
The Act was passed to provide for the taking over in the public interest of the management of coking coal mines and coke oven plants pending nationalisation of such mines and plants
By section 3 1 the management of all coking coal mines vested in the Central Government from the appointed day October 17 1971
Section 61 provided that every owner of coking coal mine shall be given by the Central Government an amount in cash for vesting in it under section 3 the management of such mine
Such amount was to be calculated in accordance with the provisions of section 62
The  36 of 1972 was passed in order inter alia to provide for the acquisition and transfer of the right title and interest of the owners of the coking mines and coke even plants
Sections 30 and 31 of that Act dealing respectively with penalties and offences by companies came into force at once but the remaining provisions were deemed to have come into force on May 1 1972
Section 3c defines coking coal mine to mean a coal mine in which there exists one or more seams of coking coal whether exclusively or in addition to any seam of other coal
By section 41 the right title and interest of the owners in relation to the coking coal mines specified in the First Schedule shall stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the Central Government free from all incumbrances
By section 42 after the appointed day that is May 1 1972 if any other coal mine was found to contain coking coal the provisions of the were to apply to such mine until it was nationalised by an appropriate legislation
By section 61 the Central Government becomes the lessee of the State Government where the rights of the owner under any mining lease granted in relation to a coking coal mine by the State Government or any other person vest in the Central Government under section 4
Section 71 empowers the Central Government to direct that the right title and interest of 1062 the owners in relation to coking coal mines or coke oven plants shall vest in a government company
Sections 10 and 11 of the Act provide for payment of the amounts to owners of the coking coal mines and coke oven plants for the vesting of their right title and interest in the Central Government
By an Amendment Act 56 of 1972 which came into force on September 12 1972 section 4A was added to the 
That section provides for premature termination of mining leases and the grant of fresh leases to Government companies or Corporations owned or controlled by Government
The Coal Mines Taking over of Management Act 15 of 1973 which received the assent of the President on March 31 1973 was given retrospective effect from January 30 1973 except section 82 which came into force at once
The Act was passed in order to provide for the taking over in the public interest of the management of coal mines pending nationalisation of such mines with a view to ensuring rational and co ordinated development of coal production and for promoting optimum utilisation of the coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto
 Section 2b of the Act defines a coal mine to mean a mine in which there exists one or more seams of coal Section 31 provides that on and from the appointed day that is January 31 1973 the management of all coal mines shall vest in the Central Government
By section 32 the coal mines specified in the Schedule shall be deemed to be the coal mines the management of which shall vest in the Central Government under sub section 1
Under the proviso to section 32 if after the appointed day the existence of any other coal mine comes to the knowledge of the Central Government it shall by a notified order make a declaration about the existence of such mine upon which the management of such coal mine also vests in the Central Government and the provisions of the Act become applicable thereto
Section 35 casts an obligation on every person in charge of the management of a coal mine immediately before the date on which the Act received the assent of the President to intimate the Central Government within 30 days from the said date the name and location of the mine as well as the name and the address of the owner if the mine is not included or deemed to be included in the Schedule
All contracts providing for the management of any coal mine made before the appointed day between the owner of the mine and any per 1063 son in charge of the mine and any person in charge of the management thereof are to be deemed to have been terminated on the appointed day under section 4 Section 61 empowers the Central Government to appoint Custodians for the purpose of taking over of the management of the mines
Section 71 provides that every owner of a coal mine shall be given by the Central Government an amount in cash for the vesting in it under section 3 of the management of such mine
Section 181a excludes from the operation of the Act any coal mine owned managed or controlled by the Central Government or by a Government Company or by a corporation which is owned managed or controlled by the Government
Clause b of section 181 also excludes from the operation of the Act a coal mine owned by or managed by a company engaged in the production of iron and steel
The  26 of 1973 was given retrospective operation with effect from May 1 1973 except sections 30 and 31 which came into force at once
This Act was passed to provide for the acquisition and transfer of the right title and interest of the owners in respect of the coal mines specified in the Schedule with a view to re organising and reconstructing such coal mines so as to ensure the rational co ordinated and scientific development and utilisation of coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country in order that the ownership and control of such resources are vested in the State and thereby so distributed as best to subserve the common good and or matters connected therewith or incidental thereto
 Section 2b defines a coal mine in the same way as the corresponding provision of the Management Act viz a mine in which there exists one or more seams of coal Section 31 provides that on the appointed day that is May 1 1973 the right title and interest of the owners in relation to the coal mines specified in the Schedule shall stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the Central Government free from all incumbrances
Section 41 provides that where the rights of an owner under any mining lease granted or deemed to have been granted in relation to a coal mine by a State Government or any other person vest in the Central Government under section 3 the Central Government shall on and from the date of such vesting be deemed to have become the lessee of the State Government or such other person as the case may be in relation to such coal mine as if a mining lease in relation to such coal mine had been granted to the Central Government
The period of such lease 1064 is to be the entire period for which the lease could have been granted by the Central Government or such other person under the Mineral Concession Rules and thereupon all the rights under the mining lease granted to the lessee are to be deemed to have been transferred to and vested in the Central Government
By section 42 on the expiry of the term of any lease referred to in sub section 1 the lease at the option of the Central Government is liable to be renewed on the same terms and conditions on which it was held by the lessor for the maximum period for which it could be renewed under the Mineral Concession Rules
Section 51 empowers the Central Government under certain conditions to direct by an order in writing that the right title and interest of an owner in relation to a coal mine shall instead of continuing to vest in the Central Government vest in the Government company
Such company under section 52 is to be deemed to have become the lessee of the coal mine as if the mining lease had been granted to it
By section 61 the property which vests in the Central Government or in a Government company is freed and discharged from all obligations and incumbrances affecting it
The mortgagees and other holders of incumbrances are required by section 62 to give intimation thereof to the Commissioner within the prescribed time
Section 71 provides that the Central Government or the Government company shall not be liable to discharge any liability of the owner agent manager or managing contractor of a coal mine in respect of any period prior to the appointed day
Section 8 requires that the owner of every coal mine or group of coal mines specified in the second column of the Schedule shall be given by the Central Government in cash and in the manner specified in Chapter VI for the vesting in it under section 3 of the right title and interest of the owner an amount equal to the amount specified against it in the corresponding entry in the fifth column of the Schedule
By section 111 the general superintendance direction control and management of the affairs and business of a coal mine the right title and interest of an owner in relation to which have vested in the Central Government under section 3 shall vest in the Government company or in the Custodian as the case may be
For the purpose of disbursing the amount payable to the owner the Central Government is required by section 171 to appoint a Commissioner of Payments
By section 181 the Central Government shall within thirty days from the specified date pay in cash to the Commissioner for payment to the owner of a coal mine an amount equal to the amount specified against the coal mine in the Schedule and also such sums as may be due to the owner under section 9
Section 261 provides that if out of the monies paid to the Commissioner any balance is left after meeting the liabilities of all the secured and un 1065 secured creditors of the coal mine he shall disburse the same to the owner
The Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Ordinance which was promulgated on April 29 1976 was replaced on May 27 1976 by the Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Act 67 of 1976
The Amendment Act consists of five sections by which certain amendments were introduced into the Principal Act namely the  26 of 1973
The Statement of objects and Reasons of the Nationalisation Amendment Act reads thus After the nationalisation of coal mines a number of persons holding coal mining leases unauthorisedly started mining of coal in the most reckless and unscientific manner without regard to considerations of conservation safety and welfare of workers
Not only were they resorting to slaughter mining by superficial working of outcrops and thereby destroying a valuable national asset and creating problems of water logging fires etc
for the future development of the deeper deposits their unsafe working also caused serious and fatal accidents
They were making larger profits by paying very low wages and by not providing any safety and welfare measures
Thefts of coal from adjacent nationalised mines were also reported after the commencement of these unauthorised operations which had shown an increasing trend of late
Areas where illegal and unauthorised operations were carried on were without any assessment of reserves in regard to quality and quantity of coal which could be made available after detailed exploration work was undertaken and results analysed
No scientific exploitation of these deposits could be undertaken in the nationalised sector without these details
It was therefore considered that it would not be appropriate either to nationalise these unauthorisedly worked mines after taking them over under the Coal Mines Taking Over of Management Act 1973 or to get the concerned mining leases prematurely terminated and regranted to Government Companies under the Mining and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 1957
In view of the policy followed by the Central Government that the Coal Industry is to be in the nationalised sector it was decided that the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act 1973 should be enacted to provide for termination of all privately held coal leases except those held by privately owned steel companies so that it may be possible for the Central Government Government company or Corporation to take 1066 mining leases where necessary after the necessary exploration has been made as to the extent of the deposits of coal etc
Sections 2 and 3 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act were brought into operation with effect from April 29 1976
By section 2 of the Amendment Act a new section section 1A was introduced under Sub section 1 of which it was declared that it was expedient in the public interest that the Union should take under its control the regulation and development of coal mines to the extent provided in subsections 3 and 4 of section 3 of the Nationalisation Act and subsection 2 of section 30
By sub section 2 of section 1A the declaration contained in sub section 1 was to be in addition to and not in derogation of the declaration contained in section 2 of the 
By section 3 of the Amendment Act a new sub section namely sub section 3 was introduced in section 3 of the principal Act
Under clause a of the newly introduced sub section 3 of section 3 on and from the commencement of section 3 of the Amendment Act no person other than i the Central Government or a Government company or a corporation owned managed or controlled by the Central Government or ii a person to whom a sub lease referred to in the proviso to clause c has been granted by any such Government company or corporation or iii a company engaged in the production of iron and steel shall carry on coal mining operation in India in any form
Under clause b of sub section 3 excepting the mining leases granted before the Amendment Act in favour of the Government company or corporation referred to in clause a and any sub lease granted by any such Government company or corporation all other mining leases and sub leases in force immediately before such commencement shall in so far as they relate to the winning or mining of coal stand terminated
Clause c of the newly introduced sub section 3 of section 3 provides that no lease for winning or mining coal shall be granted in favour of any person other than the Government company or corporation referred to in clause a
Under the proviso to clause c the Government the company or the corporation to whom a lease for winning or mining coal has been granted may grant a sublease to any person in any area if i the reserves of coal in the area are in isolated small pockets or are not sufficient for scientific and economical development in a co ordinated and integrated manner and ii the coal produced by the sub lessee will not be required to be transported by rail
By sub section 4 of section 3 where a mining lease stands terminated under sub section 3 it shall be lawful for the Central Government or a Government company or corporation owned 1067 or controlled by the Central Government to obtain a prospecting licence or mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands terminated
Section 4 of the Amendment Act introduces an additional provision in Section 30 of the Principal Act by providing that any person who engages or causes any other person to be engaged in winning or mining coal from the whole or part of any land in respect of which no valid prospecting licence or mining lease or sub lease is in force shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years and also with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees
Section 5 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act repeals the Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Ordinance 1976
As stated at the beginning of this Judgment we are concerned in these writ petitions to determine the validity of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Act 67 of 1976 to which we will refer as The Nationalisation Amendment Act 
Shri Seervai who appears on behalf of the petitioners in writ petition No 257 of 1977 challenges the legislative competence of the Parliament to enact the Nationalisation Amendment Act
Article 246 1 confers upon the Parliament notwithstanding anything contained in clauses 2 and 3 of that Article the exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I of the Seventh Schedule called the Union List 
Clause 2 of Article 246 deals with the power of the Parliament and the State Legislatures to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List while clause 3 deals with the power of the State Legislatures to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State List
The relevant entries in List I are Entries 52 and 54 which read thus Entry 52 Industries the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest
Entry 54 Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest
Entry 24 of the State List reads thus Entry 24 Industries subject of the provisions of entries 7 and 52 of List I 1068 We are not concerned here with Entry 7 of List I which relates to Industries declared by Parliament by law to be necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war 
Shri Seervai s argument runs thus a Laws made in the exercise of power conferred by Entry 54 must stand the test of public interest because the very reason for the Parliament acquiring power under that entry is that it is in public interest that the regulation of mines and minerals should be under the control of the Union
In other words Entry 54 confers a legislative power which is purposive that is to say any law made in the exercise of the power under Entry 54 must be designed to secure the regulation and development of coal mines in public interest or else it must fail
The Nationalisation Amendment Act is not such a law which Parliament can pass under Entry 54 because that Act not only terminates all leases but it destroys the contracts of service of thousands of workmen and indeed it destroys all other contracts and all securities for moneys lent without even so much as making a provision for priorities for the payment of debts
Since the Nationalisation Amendment Act terminates all leases it is a complete negation of the integrated scheme of taking over the management of mines acquisition of the rights of lease holders and the running of the mines
b The word Regulation  in Entry 54 does not include Prohibition 
Regulation  should not also be confused with the expression Restrictions  occurring in Article 192 to 6 of the Constitution
In the very nature of things there cannot be a power to prohibit the regulation and development of mines and minerals 
Section 34 inserted by the Nationalisation Amendment Act imposes no obligation on the Central Government or any other authority to obtain a mining lease and work the mines the leases in respect of which stands terminated under the Act
The words it shall be lawful for the Central Government to obtain a lease are words of discretionary power which create no obligation
They only enable the Central Government to obtain a lease making something legal and possible for which there would otherwise be no 1069 right or authority to do
Section 3 4 does not confer a power coupled with a duty it merely confers a faculty or power
No Court can by a Writ of Mandamus or otherwise compel the Central Government to obtain a lease of coal mine and to run it under any of the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act
c Where the Legislative power is distributed among different legislative bodies the Legislature may transgress its legislative power either directly or manifestly or covertly or indirectly
In the instant case the exercise of power by the Parliament is colourable because although in passing the Nationalisation Amendment Act it purported to act within the limits of its legislative power in substance and in reality it transgressed that power the transgression being veiled by what appears on proper examination to be a mere pretence or disguise
d In order to tear off the veil or disguise and in order to get at the substance of the law behind the form the Court must examine the effect of the legislation and take into consideration its object purpose and design Where the legislative entry is purposive like Entry 54 of the Union List it is the object or purpose of the legislation which requires consideration
The purpose for which the Parliament is permitted to acquire legislative power of Regulation and Development of mines must dictate the nature of law made in the exercise of that power because public interest demands that power
Under the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act not only is there no obligation on the Central Government to run a mine but there is no obligation imposed upon it even to carry out prospecting or investigation in order to decide whether a particular mine should be worked at all
Section 34 merely authorises the Central Government to apply for a prospecting licence or a mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands determined
A close examination of the Act thus discloses that far from providing for regulation and development of coal mines it totally prohibits all mining activity even if the State Government wants to run a mine
It does 1070 not impose prohibition as a step towards running the mines since there is neither any obligation to carry out the prospecting or investigation nor to run the mines
e The Nationalisation Amendment Act runs directly counter to the whole policy of the of 1973 to acquire and run the mines
The Parent Act becomes a dead letter in regard to several of its provisions ass a result of the amendment Act
It only adopts a colourable device to amend the Nationalisation Act while completely negativing it in fact
The Act therefore lacks legislative competence and is in the sense indicated a colourable piece of legislation
f Article 31A1e only lifts a restriction on the legislative competence in so far as violation of fundamental rights is concerned
The most benign motive cannot make a law valid if the legislative competence is lacking
In support of his submission that the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act are not conceived in public interest and therefore they transgress the limitations of Entry 56 List I learned counsel relies on the circumstance that whereas the Coal Mines Management Act and the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act of 1973 contain elaborate preambles the Amendment Act contains no preamble setting out the mischief to be remedied or the benefit to be secured for which the parent Act had failed to provide
At first blush it is said it would appear that the preamble to the parent Act can be read into the Nationalisation Amendment Act but that is impermissible since that preamble provides for acquisition and running of the mines and can have no application to an Act which provides for termination simpliciter of all mining leases
The preambles to the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act are said to be significant in that they show that those Acts were enacted in public interest with a view to rational and co ordinated development of coal production and for promoting the optimum utilisation of coal production consistently with the growing requirements of the country
Learned counsel has also compared and contrasted the provisions of these two Acts with the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act for making good his point that the latter serves no public interest since it merely terminates all existing leases
The contrast it is argued is also provided by section 4A of the Mines and Mineral Regulation and Development Act 1957 which while providing for premature termination of mining leases requires that 1071 such termination has to be followed by the granting of a fresh mining lease so that the mines will continue to work
Reliance is placed by counsel on the decision of this Court in K C Gajapati Narayan Deo  Ors
vs The State of Orissa to show how although the legislature in passing an Act purports to act within the limits of its legislative power in substance and in reality it can transgress that power the transgression being veiled by what appears on proper examination to be a mere pretence or disguise
Attention is then drawn to the decision in Attorney General of Alberta vs Attorney General of Canada as showing that in order to tear off the veil or disguise or in order to get at the substance of the law behind the form the court can examine the effect of the legislation and take into consideration its object purpose or design
In support of the submission that the word regulation in Entry 54 does not include prohibition reliance is placed on the decision of the Federal Court in Bhola Prasad vs The King Emperor wherein after setting out two decisions of the Privy Council in Municipal Corporation of City of Toronto vs Virgo and Attorney General for Ontario vs Attorney General for Canada in which it was held that regulation  did not include prohibition  Gwyer CJ Observed that he saw no reason to differ from the view expressed in those cases
The central theme of these diverse points is only one that the laws made in the exercise of power conferred by Entry 54 List I must stand the test of public interest since the very reason for the Parliament acquiring power under that Entry is that it is in the public interest that the regulation of mines and mineral development should be under the control of the Union
The contention is that since the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not impose upon the Government the duty to run the mines which are taken over or even to carry out prospecting and investigation but simply provides for the termination of mining leases the Act is not in public interest
What is in public interest is the regulation and development of coal mines not total prohibition of their working
On a careful consideration of this argument which was made plausible in its presentation we see no substance in it
The learned Attorney General and the learned Solicitor General have drawn our attention to various facts and circumstances and to the provisions of various Acts including the Nationalisation Amendment Act which make it impossible to hold that the provisions of that Act are a mere 1072 facade for terminating mining leases without any obligation in the matter of regulation of mines and mineral development
Granting that Entry 54 List I is purposive since it qualifies the power to pass a law relating to Regulation of Mines and Mineral Development by the addition of a restrictive clause to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act show that they are designed to serve progressively the purpose of Entry 54
The Nationalisation Amendment Act as its very title shows is an amending Act
It amended the  26 of 1973
One must primarily have regard to the object and purpose of that Act in order to find out whether the Nationalisation Amendment Act destroys the structure of that Act and is a mere pretence for acquiring new rights without providing for payment of any amount for such acquisition
The was passed in order to provide for the acquisition and transfer of the right title and interest of the owners in respect of the Coal mines specified in the Schedule to that Act
This was done with a view to reorganising and reconstructing such coal mines so as to ensure the rational co ordinated and scientific development and utilisation of coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country
The high purpose of that Act was to ensure that the ownership and control of such resources are vested in the State and thereby so distributed as best to subserve the common good
In order to achieve that purpose the Nationalisation Act provides by section 31 that On the appointed day the right title and interest of the owners in relation to the coal mines specified in the Schedule shall stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the Central Government free from all incumbrances
The appointed day is May 1 1973
For the removal of doubts it was declared by section 32 that If after the appointed day the existence of any other coal mine comes to the knowledge of the Central Government the provisions of the Coal Mines Taking over of Management Act 1973 shall until that mine is nationalised by an appropriate legislation apply to such mine
1073 By section 4 the Central Government became the lessee of the scheduled coal mines while section 5 empowers it to transfer its leasehold rights to a Government company
Chapter II of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act deals with acquisition of the rights of owners of coal mines Chapter III with payment of amounts to owners of coal mines Chapter IV with management of coal mines Chapter V lays down provisions relating to employees of coal mines Chapter VI contains provisions governing the payments of amounts to be made by the Commissioner of Payments and the last Chapter Chapter VII contains miscellaneous provisions
We have already set out the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act in extenso a little before enumerating the various points made out by Shri Seeravai during the course of his argument
It will now be enough to say by way of a summing up of the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act that 1 by section 33 a of the which was introduced by the Nationalisation Amendment Act no person other than those mentioned in clauses i to iii can carry on coal mining operations after April 29 1976 being the date on which section 3 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act came into force 2 by section 33b all mining leases and sub leases stood terminated except those granted before April 29 1976 in favour of the Central Government a Government company or corporation owned managed or controlled by the Central Government 3 section 3c prohibits the granting of a lease for winning or mining coal in favour of any person other than the Government a Government company or a corporation of the above description provided that a sub lease could be granted by these authorities to any person if the two conditions mentioned in the proviso are satisfied and 4 when a mining lease stands terminated under section 33 it shall be lawful for the Central Government or the Government company or the corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government to obtain a prospecting licence or a mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands terminated
Section 4 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act introduced an additional penal provision in the parent Act
We are unable to appreciate the argument so meticulously woven that these provisions are a direct negation of the principles of the parent Act and that they destroy the integral scheme of taking over the management of mines of acquiring the rights of lease holders and continuing to run the mines
On the contrary the Nationalisation Amendment Act is manifestly in furtherance of the object of nationalisation mentioned in the preamble to the parent Act and effec 1074 tuates the purpose mentioned in sections 31 and 32 of that Act by the addition of a new sub section sub section 3 which terminates all coal mining leases and sub leases except those referred in sub section 3b
The circumstance that the marginal note to section 3 and the title of Chapter II of the Nationalisation Act are not amended by the Nationalisation Amendment Act despite the addition of a new sub section is of little or no consequence
That sub section is a logical extension of the scheme envisaged by the original sub sections 1 and 2 of section 3
Besides marginal notes to the sections of a statute and the titles of its chapters cannot take away the effect of the provisions contained in the Act so as to render those provisions legislatively incompetent if they are otherwise within the competence of the legislature to enact
One must principally have regard to the object of an Act in order to find out whether the exercise of the legislative power is purposive unless of course the provisions of the Act show that the avowed or intended object is a mere pretence for covering a veiled transgression committed by the legislature upon its own powers
Whether a particular object can be successfully achieved by an Act is largely a matter of legislative policy
The Nationalisation Amendment Act needs no preamble especially when it is backed up by a statement of objects and reasons
Generally an amendment Act is passed in order to advance the purpose of the parent Act as reflected in the preamble to that Act
Acquisition of coal mines be it remembered is not an end in itself but is only a means to an end
The fundamental object of the Nationalisation Act as also of the Nationalisation Amendment Act is to bring into existence a state of affairs which will be congenial for regulating mines and for mineral development
In regard to the scheduled mines that purpose was achieved by the means of acquisition
In regard to mines which were not included in the Schedule the same purpose was achieved by termination of leases and sub leases and by taking over the right to work the mines
Termination of leases vesting of lease hold properties in the State Governments and the grant of leases to the Central Government or Government Companies are together the means conceived in order to achieve the object of nationalisation of one of the vital material resources of the community
An infirmity in Shri Seervai s argument is its inarticulate premise that mere acquisition of coal mines is the end of the Nationalisation Act
It is also important to bear in mind while we are on the purposiveness of the Nationalisation Amendment Act that nothing contained in the later analogous Acts can be construed as in derogation of the principle enunciated in section 18 of the Mines and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 67 of 1957 which provides that it 1075 shall be the duty of the Central Government to take all such steps as may be necessary for the conservation and development of minerals in India
Therefore even in regard to matters falling under the Nationalisation Amendment Act which terminates existing leases and makes it lawful for the Central Government to obtain fresh leases the obligation of section 18 of the Act of 1957 will continue to apply in its full rigour
As contended by the learned Solicitor General section 18 contains a statutory behest and projects a purposive legislative policy
The later Acts on the subject of regulation of mines and mineral development are linked up with the policy enunciated in Section 18
Much was made by Mr Seervai of the circumstance that the Nationalisation Amendment Act While providing by section 34 that it shall be lawful for the Central Government etc to obtain a prospecting licence or a mining lease did not impose an obligation on any one to work the mine of which the mining lease stood statutorily terminated
No mandamus it was urged could therefore issue to compel for example the Central Government to work any particular mine
This argument overlooks that Entry 54 refers to two things 1 regulation of mines and 2 mineral development
It is true that the Entry is purposive since the exercise of the power under Entry 54 has to be guided and governed by public interest
But neither the power to regulate mines nor the power to ensure mineral development postulates that no sooner is a mining lease terminated by the force of the statute than the Central Government must begin to work the mine of which the lease is terminated
It is possible that after the Nationalisation Amendment Act came into force there was a hiatus between the termination of existing leases and the granting of fresh ones
But the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not provide that any kind or type of mine shall not be developed or worked
Conservation prospecting and investigation developmental steps and finally scientific exploitation of the mines and minerals is the process envisaged by the Nationalisation Amendment Act
It is undeniable that conservation of minerals which is brought about by the termination of existing leases and sub leases is vital for the development of mines
A phased and graded programme of conservation is in the ultimate analysis one of the most satisfactory and effective means for the regulation of mines and the development of minerals
Learned counsel contended that the Nationalisation Amendment Act is destructive of the provisions of the parent Act
This contention 1076 is wholly unjustified
The destruction which the Nationalisation Amendment Act brings about is of the lease or the sub lease and not of its subject matter namely the mine itself
In terminating the lease of a house one does not destroy the house itself
It may be arguable that prohibiting the use of the house for any purpose whatsoever may for practical purposes amount to the destruction of the house itself
But we cannot accept the contention that the Nationalisation Amendment Act contains provisions directed at prohibiting the working of mines the leases in respect of which are terminated
A simple provision for granting sub leases shows that the object of the Nationalisation Amendment Act is to ensure that no mine will lie idle or unexplored
Interregnums can usefully be utilised for prospecting and investigation
They do not lead to destruction of mines
In fact it is just as well that the Amendment Act does not require the new lessee to undertake an adventure reckless and thoughtless which goes by the name of scratching of mines  which ultimately results in the slaughtering of mines
Natural resources howsoever large are not inexhaustible which makes it imperative to conserve them
Without a wise and planned conservation of such resources there can neither be a systematic regulation of mines nor a scientific development of minerals
The importance of conservation of natural resources in any scheme of regulation and development of such resources can be seen from the fact that the Parliament had to pass in August 1974 an Act called the Coal Mines Conservation and Development Act 28 of 1974 in order principally to provide for the conservation of coal and development of coal mines
Section
41 of that Act enables the Central Government for the purposes of conservation of coal and for the development of coal mines to exercise such powers and take or cause to be taken such measures as it may be necessary or proper or as may be prescribed
By section 51 a duty is cast on the owners of coal mines to take such steps as may be necessary to ensure the conservation of coal and development of the coal mines owned by them
While moving the Nationalisation Amendment Act in the Lok Sabha on May 17 1976 the Minister of Energy said that for proper scientific working of coal mines you have to have the geological data you have to have mine plans you have to know the size of the coal reserves the quantity of coal that can be mined the quality of coal etc
For this the detailed exploration has to be undertaken
It is only after all this is done that the experts can decide whether it will be economically viable and technically feasible technical feasibility comes first and then economic viability to 1077 mine the coal in that particular area
No scientific exploration of coal is possible from these areas until all the facts are known until investigation is done
The nationalised sector cannot step in unless all this information is gathered
Lok Sabha Debates 5th series volume 61 May 17 1976 columns 91 92 Measures taken for judicious preservation and distribution of natural resources may involve restrictions on their use and even prohibition upto a degree of the unplanned working of the repositories of such resources
We may in this connection refer usefully to a passage at page 383 of the First Five Year Plan Though a mining industry has been in existence in this country for about half a century only a comparatively small number of mines are being worked in an efficient manner under proper technical guidance
Many units are too small in size or too poorly financed for such working
Lack of a conservation policy is also responsible for the present condition of the industry
There is large wastage especially in minerals of marginal grades as these are either abandoned in the mines or thrown away on the mine dumps
Ways and means must be devised for the mining and recovery of these low grade materials
Ores which it is not possible to work economically under normal conditions should be left in the mines so that they may be extracted at a later date without serious loss
The mine dumps all over the country have to be carefully examined and sampled so that their valuable mineral content may be recovered by methods of beneficiation now available
It should be a rule that selective mining of high grade minerals alone should not be undertaken and that all grades should be worked and wherever possible blended to produce marketable grades
 It was observed in Attorney General for Ontario supra that a power to regulate assumes naturally if not necessarily the conservation of the thing which is to be made the subject of regulation
This position does not militate against what was observed by Lord Davey in Virgo supra that there is marked distinction to be drawn between the prohibition or prevention of a trade and the regulation or governance of it and indeed a power to regulate and govern seems to imply the continued existence of that which is to be regulated or governed
In the former case the Canada Temperance Act 1886 was held ultra vires the Dominion as it purported to repeal the prohibitory clauses of a provincial Act but its own provisions were held 1078 valid when duly brought into operation in any provincial area as relating to the peace order and good Government of Canada
In Virgo the question turned on the scope of power to frame by laws and the decision of the Privy Council was that a statutory power conferred upon a municipal corporation to make by laws for regulating and governing  a trade does not authorise the making it unlawful to carry on a lawful trade in a lawful manner
It may be borne in mind that different considerations apply in the construction of power to frame by laws but even then the Privy Council qualified the above statement of law by adding the clause in the absence of an express power of prohibition
In support of his submission that under the Nationalisation Amendment Act there is no obligation on any person or authority to run a mine Shri Seervai relies on a passage in Craies on Statute Law 6th edition page 284 to the following effect Statutes passed for the purpose of enabling something to be done are usually expressed in permissible language that is to say it is enacted that it shall be lawful  etc
or that such and such a thing may be done 
Prima facie these words import a discretion and they must be construed as discretionary unless there be anything in the subject matter to which they are applied or in any other part of the statute to show that they are meant to be imperative
But the very passage after enunciating this principle refers to a decision in Julius vs Bishop of Oxford in which Lord Cairns said that though the words it shall be lawful  are words making that legal and possible which there would otherwise be no right or authority to do and that though those words confer a faculty or power still there may be something in the nature of the thing empowered to be done something in the object for which it is to be done something in the conditions under which it is to be done something in the title of the persons for whose benefit the power is to be exercised which may couple the power with a duty and make it the duty of the person in whom the power is reposed to exercise that power when called upon to do so
It seems to us clear and we have discussed that aspect at length that section 34 uses an enabling or permissive expression in order that regulation of mines and mineral development may be ensured after a scientific prospecting investigation and planning
It is doubt 1079 less that in the language of Lord Cairns in Julius there is something in the nature of the thing which the Nationalisation Amendment Act empowers to be done something in the object for which it is to be done and something in the conditions under which it is to be done which couples the power conferred by the Act with a duty the duty being not to act in haste but with reasonable promptitude depending upon the nature of the problem under investigation
An obligation to act does not cease to be so merely because there is no obligation to act in an ad hoc or impromptu manner
It is in the context of a conglomeration of these diverse considerations that one must appreciate why in section 34 which was introduced by the Nationalisation Amendment Act Parliament used the permissive expression it shall be lawful
Thus a broad and liberal approach to the field of legislation demarcated by Entry 54 List I an objective and practical understanding of the provisions contained in the Nationalisation Amendment Act and a realistic perception of constitutional principles will point to the conclusion that the Parliament had the legislative competence to enact the Nationalisation Amendment Act
The argument which we have just disposed of is common to all the matters before us
The contention to which we will now turn is limited in its application to composite mines which contain layers of coal and some other mineral usually fireclay
This branch of Shri Seervai s argument relates to the construction of the  26 of 1973 and the Nationalisation Amendment Act
The argument is that leases of composite mines in which there are alternate seams of coal and fireclay do not fall within the scope of these Acts
The pleadings in this behalf are full and complete in Writ Petition No 257 of 1977 argued by Shri Seervai and they are tolerably adequate in a few other petitions
It is expressly averred and not effectively traversed in Writ Petition 257 of 1977 that the coal and fireclay deposits in the said area are so mixed up that one cannot work either for extraction of coal or for extraction of fireclay without disturbing each of the said two minerals
The deposits are such that at one layer there is coal the next layer is fireclay the other layer is coal the next layer is again fireclay and so on
Nirode Baran Banerjee who is the petitioner in that Writ Petition holds a composite lease dated October 17 1973 for mining coal as well as fireclay
1080 It is urged by the learned counsel that the Nationalisation Amendment Act terminates mining leases in respect of coal only and that the law terminating leases for mining coal cannot apply to a mine which contains not only coal but fireclay also
The totality of the submission on this point may be put thus a Under Article 311 of the Constitution no person can be deprived of his property without the authority of law
Article 31A1 which exempts the laws mentioned in clauses a to e from invalidity under Articles 14 19 and 31 does not dispense with the necessity of the authority of law for depriving a person his property because the opening words of Article 31A1 are  no law providing for   matters mentioned in clauses a to e shall be deemed to be void as offending Articles 14 19 and 31
b The Nationalisation Amendment Act confers no authority to terminate a composite lease for mining coal and fireclay
The right to mine fireclay is given to the petitioner by law and it can only be taken away by law
c Though the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not in terms prohibit the petitioner from mining fireclay the effect of the law in a practical business sense is to prohibit the petitioner from mining fireclay and therefore the position is the same as though the Act had enacted the prohibition in express terms
The Court must look at the direct impact of the law on this right of the party and if that impact prohibits him from exercising his right the fact that there is no express prohibition in the Act is immaterial d The Nationalisation Amendment Act by making it punishable to mine coal in substance and in a practical business sense prohibits the petitioner from mining fireclay
For this prohibition the Amendment Act does not provide and therefore there is no authority of law for it
Coal and fireclay are two distinct minerals as shown by Schedule II to the  67 of 1957 wherein item 1 is coal and item 15 is fireclay
The dictionary meanings of coal and fireclay also show that they are two distinct minerals
In support of these submissions Shri Seervai relies very strongly on the definition of coal mine  in section 2b of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act 26 of 1973 and the definition by contrast of coking coal mine  in section 3c of the  36 of 1972
1081 These submissions are met by the learned Attorney General with the answer that if a mine has a seam of coal it is a coal mine within the meaning of section 2b of Act 26 of 1973 and that for the purposes of that definition it makes no difference whether the mine has seams of fireclay also
The Attorney General says further that the definition of coking coal mine  in section 3c of Act 36 of 1972 contains words of surplusage which ought rather to be ignored than be allowed to determine the scope of the definition contained in section 2b of Act 26 of 1973
The contention in other words is that a coal mine is a mine in which there is at least one seam of coal no matter whether there are seams therein of fireclay or any other mineral
The learned Solicitor General contends that the authority of Law extends to whatever is the necessary consequence of that which is authorised
In other words authority to do a thing necessarily includes the authority to do all other things which are necessary for the doing of that which is authorised
If law authorises the termination of coal mining leases it must be taken to authorise whatever is necessarily incidental to and consequential upon it
Therefore composite leases cannot be excepted from the provisions of an Act which terminates coal mining leases
Section 33 a introduced by the Nationalisation Amendment Act it is contended prohibits persons other than those mentioned in clauses i to iii from carrying on coal mining operation in any form
If a person holding a composite lease can do fireclay mining without mining coal he may do so otherwise section 33 a is the authority of law to prevent him from mining fireclay
In other words according to the learned Solicitor General the necessary implication of law is that though a composite lease for mining coal and fireclay may remain outstanding after the enactment of the Nationalisation Amendment Act the lessee cannot work it if it involves a coal mining operation
The point raised by Shri Seervai is so nicely balanced that it is as difficult to reject it wholly as it is to accept it wholly
The contrast in definitions favours him
The  26 of 1973 defines a coal mine by section 2b thus Coal mine means a mine in which there exists one or more seams of coal
If this definition is considered in isolation the learned Attorney General could perhaps be right in his submission that any mine in which there is one seam of coal at least one is a coal mine
The definition takes no account of whether there are seams of other minerals and if so how many in the mine
One seam of coal is enough to make a mine a coal mine
For reasons which we will presently mention it is not easy to 1082 stretch the definition as far as logic may take it for that will produce the result that just one seam of coal at the roof of a mine or at its base will be enough to bring a mine within the definition contained in section 2b
The scheme of the Coal Nationalisation Acts on which Shri Seervai relies has a relevance of its own on this point
The of 1972 and the of 1973 cover the whole field of Coal  which was intended to be nationalised
The titles of the two Acts and the various provisions contained therein show that what was being nationalised was three distinct categories of mines mines containing seams of coking coal exclusively mines containing seams of coking coal along with seams of other coal and mines containing seams of other coal
Though Parliament had power under Article 31A1 e of the Constitution to terminate mining leases without payment of any compensation or amount  it decided to nationalise coal mines on payment of amounts specified in the Schedules to the Nationalisation Acts of 1972 and 1973
Besides even when something apart from coking coal mines was acquired namely coke oven plants  provision was separately made in section 11 of the Nationalisation Act of 1972 read with the 2nd Schedule for payment of amounts to owners of coke oven plants
Thus whatever was intended to be acquired was paid for
This scheme is prima facie inconsistent with the Parliament intending to acquire lease hold rights in other minerals like fireclay without the payment of any amount
Coupled with this is the unambiguous wording of section 33 b and section 33 c of the Nationalisation Act of 1973 which were introduced therein by section 3 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act
Section 33b says that excepting the mining leases and sub leases granted before the commencement of the Act in favour of or by certain bodies or authorities all other mining leases and sub leases in force before such commencement shall in so far as they relate to the winning or mining of coal stand terminated
emphasis supplied Section 33c provides that no lease for winning or mining coal shall be granted in favour of any person other than the Government company or corporation referred in clause a
emphasis supplied
These provisions carry the scheme of the Nationalisation Acts to their logical conclusion by emphasising that the target of those Acts is coal mines pure and simple
What stands terminated under 1083 section 33b is certain mining leases and sub leases in so far as they relate to the winning or mining of coal
The embargo placed by section 33c is on the granting of leases for winning or mining coal to persons other than those mentioned in section 33a
Since the definition of coal mine  in section 2b of the has an uncertain import and the scheme of that Act and of the makes it plausible that rights in minerals other than coke and coal were not intended to be acquired under the two Nationalisation Acts it becomes necessary to compare and contrast the definition of coal mine  in section 2b of the Act of 1973 with the definition of coking coal mine  in section 3c of the of 1972
Section 3c of the latter Act says  coking coal mine  means a coal mine in which there exists one or more seams of coking coal whether exclusively or in addition to any seam of other coal
emphasis supplied
This definition justifies Shri Seervai s argument that whereas in regard to coking coal mines the existence of any seam of other coal was regarded as inconsequential the existence of any seam of another mineral was not considered as inconsequential in regard to a coal mine
The definition of coal mine in section 2b of the Act of 1973 scrupulously deleted the clause whether exclusively or in addition to any other seam
The same Legislature which added the particular clause in the definition of coking coal mine  in the 1972 Act deleted it in the definition of coal mine  in the 1973 Act
The position in regard to the coking coal mines is crystal clear namely that by section 41 of the Act of 1972 the right title and interest of owners in relation to the coking coal mines specified in the First Schedule to the Act stood transferred to and vested absolutely in the Central Government free from all incumbrances on the appointed day
The same position obtained under section 5 of that Act in regard to coke oven plants specified in the Second Schedule
But in so far as coal mines are concerned we have willy nilly to proceed on the basis that by reason of the definition of coal mine contained in section 2b of the Act of 1973 and the definition of coking coal mine in section 3c of the Act of 1972 which presents a striking contrast to the definition in section 2b composite coal mines that is to say coal mines in which there are seams of coal and fireclay we are only concerned with fireclay in these petition do not fall within the scope of the definition of coal mine  in section 2b of the 1084 Act of 1973
To that extent Shri Seervai s contention must succeed
But what then is the sequitur Can the lessees of composite mines like the petitioners in Writ Petitions Nos
257 220 111 600 1130 1134 352 221 and 178 of 1977 who hold composite mining leases for winning coal and fireclay continue their mining operations unabated despite the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act We think not
It is one thing to say that a composite mine is outside the scope of the definition of coal mine in section 2b of the Nationalisation Act of 1973 and quite another to conclude therefrom that the other provisions introduced into that Act by the Nationalisation Amendment Act will have no impact on composite leases for winning coal and fireclay
Section 33 a which was introduced into the parent Act by the Nationalisation Amendment Act provides expressly that on and from the commencement of section 3 of the Amendment Act that is from April 29 1976 no person other than those mentioned in clauses i to iii shall carry on coal mining operation in India in any form
Section 4 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act which introduced sub section 2 in section 30 of the parent Act provides Any person who engages or causes any other person to be engaged in winning or mining coal from the whole or part of any land in respect of which no valid prospecting licence or mining lease or sub lease is in force shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years and also with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees
These provisions of sections 33a and 302 of the parent Act will apply of their own force whether or not the lessee holds a composite lease for winning coal and fireclay and whether or not the mine is a composite mine containing alternate seams of coal and fireclay
In other words as contended by the learned Solicitor General if a person holding a composite lease can do fireclay mining without mining coal he may do so
But if he cannot win or mine fireclay without doing a coal mining operation that is without winning or mining coal he cannot do any mining operation at all
If he does so he will be liable for the penal consequences provided for in section 302 of the Nationalisation Act of 1973
The provision contained in section 33a totally prohibiting the generality of persons from carrying on coal mining operation in India in any form and the penal provision of section 302 virtually 1085 Leave with the lessees of composite mines the husk of a mining interest
That they cannot win or mine coal is conceded and indeed there is no escape from that position in view of the aforesaid provisions
The only surviving question then is whether they can win or mine fireclay since their composite lease is outside the scope of section 2b of the Nationalisation Act of 1973
The answer has to be in the negative on the basis of the very averments made by the petitioners in their Writ Petitions
For example the petitioner in Writ Petition No 257 of 1957 has stated in his petition more particularly in paragraph 5 thereof that the seams of coal and fireclay are so situated in the mine of which he is a lessee that it is not possible to mine fireclay without mining coal
This position was not only admitted but reiterated by Shri Seervai both during the course of his oral argument and in his written brief
The conclusion is therefore inevitable that the lessees of composite mines will for all practical purposes have to nurse their deeds of lease without being able to exercise any of the rights flowing from them
On their own showing they will be acting at their peril if they attempt to win fireclay
If they cannot win fireclay without winning coal they cannot win fireclay either even if they hold composite leases under which they are entitled to win coal and fireclay
This position fortifies the argument of the learned Solicitor General that though the Parliament provided for the payment of amounts for acquisition of certain interests under the Nationalisation Acts of 1972 and 1973 it did not intend to pay any compensation or amount for the termination of leasehold rights in respect of composite mines
Mines which have alternate seams of coal and fireclay are in a class by themselves and they appear to be far fewer in number as compared with the coking coal mines and coal mines properly so called
The authority of law for the termination of the rights of composite lessees is the provision contained in section 33 a the violation of which attracts the penal provisions of section 302 of the Nationalisation Act of 1973
The Parliament has deprived composite lessees of their right to win fireclay because they cannot do so without winning coal
The winning of coal by the generality of people is prohibited by the section 33 a of the Act of 1973
This is just as well because Parliament could not have intended that such islands of exception should swallow the main stream of the Nationalisation Acts
Obviously no rights were intended to be left outstanding once the rights in respect of coking coal mines and coal mines were brought to an end
1086 The petitioners in Writ Petitions Nos 257 220 111 600 1130 1134 352 221 and 178 of 1977 hold composite mining leases for mining fireclay and coal
In these Petitions we had passed the following order on May 5 1978 These petitions are allowed partly in that the petitioners therein shall be entitled for the duration of the unexpired portion of their existing leases to carry on mining operations for the purpose of winning fireclay so long as and to the extent that they do not carry on any coal mining operation or engage in winning or mining coal
In these Writ Petitions there will be no order as to costs
As we have already stated no tangible benefit will accrue to the petitioners from this order because on their own showing they cannot carry on mining operations for the purpose of winning fireclay without carrying on a coal mining operation or without engaging in winning or mining coal
That is how the matter rests
The only other arguments which requires consideration is the one made principally by Shri A K Sen which like Shri Seervai s argument of legislative competence is common to all the writ petitions
Shri Sen s argument may be stated thus 1 The Nationalisation Amendment Act affects in substance two kinds of transfers the transfer of the leasehold interests of the lessees in favour of the lessor namely the State and the transfer of the mining business of the lessees in favour of the Central Government
Since these transfers amount to acquisition within the meaning of Article 312 the Act is open to challenge under Articles 14 191 g and 31 of the Constitution
2 The Nationalisation Amendment Act is open to challenge under Article 14 because lessees who fall within that Act are patently discriminated against in comparison with lessees of other mines both coking and non coking who were paid compensation when their property was taken over first for management under the Management Acts and then under the Nationalisation Acts
3 The Nationalisation Amendment Act is open to challenge under Article 191 g because the prohibition against lessees from carrying on their business and the transfer of their business in substance to the Central Government or a Company is an unreasonable restriction on the 1087 right of the lessees to hold their lease hold property and to carry on their business of mining
4 The Act is open to challenge under Article 31 because no provision is made for the payment of any amount whatsoever to the lessees whose mining business is taken over under the Act
No public purpose is involved either in the termination of the lessees  interest or in the acquisition of their business
Expropriation without payment of any amount requires a very heavy public purpose
5 Since no provision whatsoever is made for the payment of any amount to the lessees whose leases are terminated the Nationalisation Amendment Act is not a Law  within the meaning of Article 312 and therefore Article 19 1 f is attracted
6 The Act is not saved from the challenge of Articles 14 19 and 31 by Article 31A1e because that Article provides for extinguishment which does not amount to acquisition by the State
If extinguishment amounting to acquisition was intended to be saved under Article 31A1 e the subject matter dealt with by clause e would have been included in clause a of that Article
It shall have been noticed that the entire argument hinges around the premise that by the Nationalisation Amendment Act the petitioners right to property has been acquired without the payment of any amount and that they have been unreasonably deprived of their right to carry on the business of mining
A close and careful examination of the provisions of the and of the amendments made to that Act by the Nationalisation Amendment Act will show that there is no substance in either of these contentions
The  nationalised coal mines by providing by section 31 that on the appointed day that is on May 1 1973 the right title and interest of the owners in relation to the coal mines specified in the Schedule shall stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the Central Government free from all incumbrances
The Scheduled mines 711 in number and situated in reputed coal bearing areas were the ones which were engaged openly lawfully and uninterruptedly in doing coal mining business
Since it was possible to ascertain and verify the relevant facts pertaining to these undertakings they were taken over on payment of amounts 1088 mentioned in the Schedule to the Act which varied from mine to mine depending upon the value of their assets their potential and their profitability
In the very nature of things the list of mines in the Schedule could not be exhaustive because there were and perhaps even now there are unauthorised mines worked by persons who did not possess the semblance of a title or right to do mining business
Persons falling within that category cannot cite the Constitution as their charter to continue to indulge in unauthorised mining which is unscientific unsystematic and detrimental to the national interests by reason of its tendency to destroy the reserve of natural resources
But alongside these persons there could conceivably be mine operators who may have been doing their business lawfully but who were not easily or readily identifiable
Section 32 of the Nationalisation Act 1973 made provision for taking over the management of such mines by declaring for the removal of doubts that if after the appointed day the existence of any other coal mine comes to the knowledge of the Central Government the provisions of the Coal Mines Taking Over of Management Act 1973 shall until that mine is nationalised by an appropriate legislation apply to such mine
Owners of mines whose mines were not included in the Schedule but whose right title and interest was to vest eventually in the Central Government under an appropriate legislation envisaged by section 32 of the Nationalisation Act were by this method placed on par with the owners of mines of which the management was taken over under the Coal Mines Taking Over of Management Act 1973
That Act provides by section 71 that every owner of a coal mine shall be given by the Central Government an amount in cash for the vesting in it under section 3 of the management of such mine
By section 72 for every month during which the management of a coal mine remains vested in the Central Government the amount referred to in sub section 1 shall be computed at the rate of twenty paise per tonne of coal on the highest monthly production of coal from such mine during any month in the years 1969 1970 1971 and 1972
The two provisos to that sub section and the other sub sections of section 7 provide for other matters relating to payment of amounts to the owners of coal mines of which the management was taken over
The Nationalisation Amendment Act carried the scheme of these two Acts to its logical conclusion by terminating the so called leases and sub leases which might have remained outstanding
Thus the purpose attained by these Acts is 1 to vest in the Central Government the right of management of all coal mines 2 to nationalise the mines mentioned in the Schedule 3 to provide for the taking over of management of coal mines the existence of which comes to the knowledge of the Central Government after the appoint 1089 ed day and lastly 4 to terminate all mining leases
The Management Act and the Nationalisation Act provide for payment of amounts by no means illusory to the owners of coal mines whose rights were taken over
In the normal course of human affairs particularly business affairs it is difficult to conceive that owners of coal mines who had even the vestige of a title thereto would not bring to the notice of the Central Government the existence of their mines when such mines were not included in the Schedule to the Nationalisation Act
Those who did not care to bring the existence of their mines to the knowledge of the Central Government even though amounts are payable under the Management Act for the extinguishment of the right of management did not evidently possess even the semblance of a title to the mines
The claims of lessees holding or allegedly holding under such owners would be as tenuous as the title of their putative lessors
The Nationalisation Amendment Act by section 33 b undoubtedly terminates all existing leases and sub leases except those already granted in favour of persons referred to in clauses i to iii of section 3 3a
Similarly section 3 3a imposes an embargo on all future coal mining operations except in regard to the persons mentioned in clauses i to iii
But the generality of leases which are alleged to have remained outstanding despite the coming into force of the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act were mostly precarious whose holders could at best present the familiar alibi that the origin of their rights or of those from whom they derived title was lost in antiquity
Neither in law nor in equity and justice nor under the Constitution can these lessees be heard to complain of the termination of their lease hold rights without the payment of any amount
The provision contained in section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act was made ex majore cautela so as not to leave any lease of a coal mine surviving after the enactment of the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
There was no reasonable possibility of a lawful lease surviving the passing of those Acts but if per chance anyone claimed that he held a lease that stood terminated under section 33b
Once the real nature of the scheme envisaged by the Management Act the Nationalisation Act and the Nationalisation Amendment Act is appreciated it will be easy to see that section 33 b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act brings about an extinguishment simpliciter of coal mining leases within the meaning of Article 31A 1e of the Constitution
That Article as it stood prior to the 44th Amendment read thus 1090 31A 1 Notwithstanding anything contained in Article 13 no law providing for e the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement lease or licence for the purpose of searching for or winning any mineral or mineral oil or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement lease or licence shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 article 19 or article 31
We are not concerned with the amendment introduced by the 44th Amendment Act which deleted the reference to Article 31 since that Amendment Act came into force prospectively with effect from June 20 1979
We are unable to accept that the termination of the mining leases and sub leases brought about by section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act is a mere pretence for the acquisition of the mining business of the lessees and the sub lessees
We have already shown how in the context of the scheme of the Management Act the Nationalisation Act and the Nationalisation Amendment Act it is impossible to hold that the true intent of the last mentioned Act was to acquire  anyone s business
This would be so whether the word acquire  is understood in its broad popular sense or in the narrow technical sense which it has come to possess
Whatever rights were intended to be acquired were paid for by the fixation of amounts or by the laying down of a formula for ascertaining amounts payable for acquisition
It is hard to believe that having provided for payment of amounts for acquisition of management and ownership rights the legislature resorted to the subterfuge of acquiring the mining business of the surviving lessees and sub lessees by the device of terminating their leases and sub leases
The legislative history leading to the termination of coal mining leases points to one conclusion only that by and large every lawful interest which was acquired was paid for the extinguishment of the interest which survived or which is alleged to have survived the passing of the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act was provided for merely in order to ensure that no loophole was left in the implementation of the scheme envisaged by those Acts
1091 This will provide a short answer to Shri Sen s argument that persons whose leases and sub leases are terminated without payment of any amount are discriminated against in comparison with other lessees who were paid amounts when their property was taken over
The answer is that persons dealt with by section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act are differently situated from those who were dealt with by the two earlier Acts
No violation of Article 14 is therefore involved
Likewise we see no substance in the contention that no public purpose is involved in the termination of the interest of the lessees and sub lessees which was brought about by the Nationalisation Amendment Act
The public purpose which informs that Act is the same which lies behind its two precursors the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
The purpose is to reorganize and re structure coal mines so as to ensure the rational coordinated and scientific development and utilisation of coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country
The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Nationalisation Amendment Act points in the direction
Public purpose runs like a continuous thread through the well knit scheme of the three Acts under consideration
This discussion is sufficient to meet the contention of the petitioners that the interest of the lessees and sub lessees has been acquired under the Nationalisation Amendment Act by the termination of leases and sub leases
But we may examine that contention in the light of the relevant Constitutional provisions and principles
It was observed in Dwarkadas Shrinivas vs The Sholapur Spinning  Weaving Co Ltd that the provisions of the Constitution touching fundamental rights must be construed broadly and liberally in favour of those on whom the rights have been conferred
The form is unessential
It is the substance that we must seek
Making every allowance in favour of the right to property which was available at the relevant time and having regard to the substance of the matter and not merely to the form adopted for terminating the interest of the lessees and the sub lessees we are of the opinion that the Nationalisation Amendment Act involves no acquisition of the interest of the lessees and the sub lessees
It merely brings about in the language of Article 31A1e the extinguishment of their right if any to win coal
Whichever right title and interest was lawful and identifiable was acquired by the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
And whichever interest was acquired was paid for
Tenuous and furtive interests 1092 which survived the passing of those Acts were merely extinguished by the Nationalisation amendment Act
In Ajit Singh vs State of Punjab it was observed by Hindayatullah J in the dissenting judgment which he gave on behalf of himself and Shelat J that in the case of extinguishment within the meaning of Article 31A if all the rights in a property are extinguished the result would be nothing else than acquisition because no property can remain in suspense without the rights therein being vested in some one or the other
These observations made by the learned Judge are not contrary to anything contained in the majority judgment delivered by Sikri J and naturally therefore great reliance is placed upon them by the petitioners
Even greater sustenance is drawn by the petitioners from the judgment of a 7 Judge Bench of this Court in Madan Mohan Pathak vs Union of India  Ors
In that case a settlement which the Life Insurance Corporation had arrived at with its employees was substantially set at naught by the Life Insurance Corporation Modification of Settlement Act 1976
It was held by this Court that the Act was violative of Article 312 since it did not provide for payment of any amount for the compulsory acquisition of the debts owed by the Life Insurance Corporation to its employees that the direct effect of the impugned Act was to transfer ownership of the debts due and owing to Class III and Class IV employees in respect of annual cash bonus to the Life Insurance Corporation and that since the Corporation is owned by the State the impugned Act was a law providing for compulsory acquisition of the debts by the State within the meaning of Article 312A
These decisions have no application to the instant case because the interest of the lessees and sub lessees which was brought to termination by section 33 b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not come to be vested in the State
The Act provides that excepting a certain class of leases and sub leases all other leases and sub leases shall stand terminated in so far as they relate to the winning or mining of coal
There is no provision in the Act by which the interest so terminated is vested in the State Nor does such vesting flow as a necessary consequence of any of the provisions of the Act
Sub section 4 of section 3 of the Act provides that where a mining lease stands terminated under sub section 3 it shall be lawful for the Central Government or a Government company or a corporation owned or controlled by the Central government to obtain a prospecting licence or a mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands so terminated
1093 The plain intendment of the Act which may it be reiterated is neither a pretence nor a facade is that once the outstanding leases and subleases are terminated the Central Government and the other authorities will be free to apply for a mining lease
Any lease hold interest which the Central Government for example may thus obtain does not directly or immediately flow from the termination brought about by section 33b
Another event has to intervene between the termination of existing leases and the creation of new interests
The Central Government etc
have to take a positive step for obtaining a prospecting licence or a mining lease
Without it the Act would be ineffective to create of its own force any right or interest in favour of the Central Government a Government Company or a Corporation owned managed or controlled by the Central Government
As observed by Sikri J in Ajit Singh supra the essential difference between acquisition by the State on the one hand and modification or extinguishment of rights on the other is that in the first case the beneficiary is the State while in the second the beneficiary is not the State
The Nationalisation Amendment Act merely extinguishes the rights of the lessees and the sub lessees
It does not provide for the acquisition of those rights directly or indirectly by the State
Article 312A will therefore come into play by which Where a law does not provide for the transfer of the ownership or right to possession of any property to the State or to a corporation owned or controlled by the State it shall not be deemed to provide for the compulsory acquisition or requisitioning of property notwithstanding that it deprives any person of his property
 The position in Madan Mohan Pathak supra was entirely different because the direct effect of the impugned Act was to transfer ownership of the debts due and owing to Class III and Class IV employees in respect of annual cash bonus to the Life Insurance Corporation since the LIC is a Corporation owned by the State the impugned Act was held to be a law providing for compulsory acquisition of these debts by the State within the meaning of clause 2A of Article 31
Shri Sen s argument on the question of acquisition of the rights of lessees and sub lessees by the State therefore fails
It follows that the Nationalisation Amendment Act must receive the protection of Article 31A1e of the Constitution that is to say that the Act cannot be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by Articles 14 19 and 31
1094 These are our reasons for the order passed by us on May 5 1978 which reads thus  The stay orders passed in these Writ Petitions are vacated except in those Writ Petitions viz Writ Petitions Nos 257 220 111 600 1130 1134 352 221 and 17877 in which composite mining leases have been granted for mining both fireclay and coal
The stay orders in these latter petitions shall stand modified as from to day on the lines of the order recorded below
All the Writ Petitions are dismissed with costs except Writ Petitions Nos 257 220 111 600 1130 1134 352 221 and 17877 in each of which there is a composite mining for mining fireclay and coal
These Petitions are allowed partly in that the petitioners therein shall be entitled for the duration of the unexpired portion of their existing leases to carry on mining operations for the purpose of winning fireclay so long as and to the extent that they do not carry on any coal mining operation or engage in winning or mining coal
In these writ petitions there will be no order as to costs
We have already indicated how though the petitioners holding composite leases were permitted to carry on mining operations for the purpose of winning fireclay they according to their own showing cannot win or mine fireclay without doing a coal mining operation or without engaging in winning or mining coal
It is self evident that in attempting to win fireclay they will have to act at their own peril since they will run the risk of being prosecuted under section 302 of the 
Petition Nos 111 178 220 221 257 352 600 and 1130 1134 partly allowed
Petition Nos 150 151 180 205 210 226 270 271 346 355 403 396 398 599 541 543 626 635 639 661 687 692 75877 and 154 571 574 603 605 610 and 61177 dismissed


Summary:
Article 2461 of the Constitution of India confers upon the Parliament notwithstanding anything contained in clauses 2 and 3 of that Article the exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I of the Seventh Schedule called the Union List Clause 2 of Article 246 deals with the power of the Parliament and the State Legislatures to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent List while clause 3 deals with the power of the State Legislatures to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the State List
Entry 23 List II Schedule VII of the Constitution read with Article 2463 confers legislative power on the State Legislatures in respect of Regulation of mines and mineral development but that power is subject to the provisions of List I with respect to regulation and development under the control of the Union
Entry 54 List I enables Parliament to acquire legislative power in respect of Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest
Entry 24 List II relates to Industries subject to the provisions of entries 7 and 52 of List I
Entry 7 List I relates to Industries declared by Parliament by law to be necessary for the purpose of defence or for the prosecution of war
Entry 52 List I enables Parliament to acquire legislative power in respect of Industries the control of which by the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest
Pursuant to these powers the Parliament enacted the Industries Development  Regulation Act 65 of 1951 the Mines Act 35 of 1952 the Mines and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 67 of 1957 the Coking Coal Mines Emergency Provisions Act 64 of 1971 the Coking Coal Mines Nationalisation Act 36 of 1972 the Coking Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Act 56 of 1972 the Coal Mines Taking over of Management Act 15 of 1973 and the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act 26 of 1973
Thereafter the Coal Mines Nationalisation Amendment Act 67 of 1976 was passed the objects and reasons being 1043 After the nationalisation of coal mines a number of persons holding coal mining leases unauthorisedly started mining of coal in the most reckless and unscientific manner without regard to considerations of conservation safety and welfare of workers
Not only were they resorting to slaughter mining by superficial working of outcrops and thereby destroying a valuable national asset and creating problems of water logging fires etc
for the future development of the deeper deposits their unsafe working also caused serious and fatal accidents
They were making larger profits by paying very low wages and by not providing any safety and welfare measures
Thefts of coal from adjacent nationalised mines were also reported after the commencement of these unauthorised operations which had shown an increasing trend of late
Areas where illegal and unauthorised operations were carried on were without any assessment of reserves in regard to quality and quantity of coal which could be made available after detailed exploration work was undertaken and results analysed
No scientific exploitation of these deposits could be undertaken in the nationalised sector without these details
It was therefore considered that it would not be appropriate either to nationalise these unauthorisedly worked mines after taking them over under the Coal Mines Taking over of Management Act 1973 or to get the concerned mining leases prematurely terminated and regranted to Government Companies under the Mining and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 1957
In view of the policy followed by the Central Government that the Coal Industry is to be in the nationalised sector it was decided that the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act 1973 should be enacted to provide for termination of all privately held coal leases except those held by privately owned steel companies so that it may be possible for the Central Government Government Company or Corporation to take mining leases where necessary after necessary exploration has been made as to the extent of the deposits of coal etc
 The petitioners who were the lessees of coal mines by the State Government being aggrieved by the provisions of the Amendment Act 67 of 1976 challenged the competence of Parliament to enact the Amendment Act and also the validity of the Act and contended a Laws made in the exercise of power conferred by Entry 54 must stand the test of public interest because the very reason for the Parliament acquiring power under that entry is that it is in public interest that the regulation of mines and minerals should be under the control of the Union
In other words Entry 54 confers a legislative power which is purposive that is to say any law made in the exercise of the power under Entry 54 must be designed to secure the regulation and development of coal mines in public interest or else it must fail
The Nationalisation Amendment Act is not such a law which Parliament can pass under Entry 54 because that Act not only terminates all leases but it destroys the contracts of service of thousands of workmen and indeed it destroys all other contracts and all securities for moneys lent without even so much as making a provision for priorities for the payment of debts
Since the Nationalisation Amendment Act terminates all leases it is a complete negation of the integrated scheme of taking over the management of mines acquisition of the rights of lease holders and the running of the mines
b The word Regulation  in Entry 54 does not include Prohibition 
Regulation  should not also be confused with the expression Restrictions  occur 1044 ring in Article 192 to 6 of the Constitution
In the very nature of things there cannot be a power to prohibit the regulation and development of mines and minerals 
Section 34 inserted by the Nationalisation Amendment Act imposes no obligation on the Central Government or any other authority to obtain a mining lease and work the mines the leases in respect of which stand terminated under the Act
The words it shall be lawful for the Central Government to obtain a lease are words of discretionary power which create no obligation
They only enable the Central Government to obtain a lease making something legal and possible for which there would otherwise be no right or authority to do
Section 34 does not confer a power coupled with a duty it merely confers a faculty or power
No Court can by a Writ of Mandamus or otherwise compel the Central Government to obtain a lease of a coal mine and to run it under any of the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act
c Where the Legislative power is distributed among different legislative bodies the Legislature may transgress its legislative power either directly or manifestly or covertly or indirectly
In the instant case the exercise of power by the Parliament is colourable because although in passing the Nationalisation Amendment Act it purported to act within the limits of its legislative power in substance and in reality it transgressed that power the transgression being veiled by what appears on proper examination to be a mere pretence or disguise
d In order to tear off the veil or disguise and in order to get at the substance of the law behind the form the Court must examine the effect of the legislation and take into consideration its object purpose and design
Where the legislative entry is purposive like Entry 54 of the Union List it is the object or purpose of the legislation which requires consideration
The purpose for which the Parliament is permitted to acquire legislative power of Regulation and Development of mines must dictate the nature of law made in the exercise of that power because public interest demands that power
Under the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act not only is there no obligation on the Central Government to run a mine but there is no obligation imposed upon it even to carry out prospecting or investigation in order to decide whether a particular mine should be worked at all
Section 34 merely authorises the Central Government to apply for a prospecting licence or a mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands determined
A close examination of the Act thus discloses that far from providing for regulation and development of coal mines it totally prohibits all mining activity even if the State Government wants to run a mine
It does not impose prohibition as a step towards running the mines since there is neither any obligation to carry out the prospecting or investigation nor to run the mines
e The Nationalisation Amendment Act runs directly counter to the whole policy of the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act of 1973 to acquire and run the mines
The Parent Act becomes a dead letter in regard to several of its provisions as a result of the Amendment Act
It only adopts a colourable device to amend the Nationalisation Act while completely negativing it in fact
The Act therefore lacks legislative competence and is in the sense indicated a colourable piece of legislation
1045 f Article 31A1e only lifts a restriction on the legislative competence in so far as violation of fundamental rights is concerned
The most benign motive cannot make a law valid if the legislative competence is lacking
g Under Article 311 of the Constitution no person can be deprived of his property without the authority of law
Article 31A1 which exempts the laws mentioned in clauses a to e from invalidity under Articles 14 19 and 31 does not dispense with the necessity of the authority of law for depriving a person of his property because the opening words of Article 31A1 are   no law providing for   matters mentioned in clauses a to e shall be deemed to be void as offending Articles 14 19 and 31
h The Nationalisation Amendment Act confers no authority to terminate a composite lease for mining coal and fire clay
The right to mine fire clay is given to the petitioner by law and it can only be taken away by law
i Though the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not in terms prohibit the petitioner from mining fireclay the effect of the law in a practical business sense is to prohibit the petitioner from mining fireclay and therefore the position is the same as though the Act had enacted the prohibition in express terms
The Court must look at the direct impact of the law on the right of the party and if that impact prohibits him from exercising his right the fact that there is no express prohibition in the Act is immaterial
j The Nationalisation Amendment Act by making it punishable to mine coal in substance and in a practical business sense prohibits the petitioner from mining fireclay
For this prohibition the Amendment Act does not provide and therefore there is no authority of law for it
Coal and fireclay are two distinct minerals as shown by Schedule II to the Mines and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 67 of 1957 wherein item 1 is coal and item 15 is fireclay
The dictionary meanings of coal and fireclay also show that they are two distinct minerals
k The Nationalisation Amendment Act affects in substance two kinds of transfers the transfer of the lease hold interests of the lessees in favour of the lessor namely the State and the transfer of the mining business of the lessees in favour of the Central Government
Since these transfers amount to acquisition within the meaning of Article 312 the Act is open to challenge under Articles 14 191g and 31 of the Constitution
1 The Nationalisation Amendment Act is open to challenge under Article 14 because lessees who fall within that Act are patently discriminated against in comparison with lessees of other mines both coking and non coking who were paid compensation when their property was taken over first for management under the Management Acts and then under the Nationalisation Acts
m The Nationalisation Amendment Act is open challenge under Article 191g because the prohibition against lessees from carrying on their business and the transfer of their business in substance to the Central Government or a Company is an unreasonable restriction on the right of the lessees to hold their lease hold property and to carry on their business of mining
n The Act is open to challenge under Article 31 because no provision is made for the payment of any amount whatsoever to the lessees whose mining business is taken over under the Act
No public purpose is involved either in the 1046 termination of the lessees  interest or in the acquisition of their business
Expropriation without payment of any amount requires a very heavy public purpose
o Since no provision whatsoever is made for the payment of any amount to the lessees whose leases are terminated the Nationalisation Amendment Act is not a Law  within the meaning of Article 312 and therefore Article 191f is attracted
p The Act is not saved from the challenge of Articles 14 19 and 31 by Article 31A 1 e because that Article provides for extinguishment which does not amount to acquisition by the State
If extinguishment amounting to acquisition was intended to be saved under Article 31A1 e the subject matter dealt with by clause e would have been included in clause a of that Article
Dismissing all the Writ Petitions except Writ Petitions Nos 111 178 220 221 257 352 600  1130 113477 which are allowed in part the Court  HELD  1 The provisions of the Amendment Act 67 of 1976 are not a mere facade for terminating mining leases without any obligation in the matter of regulation of mines and mineral development
1071H 1072A Grating that Entry 54 List I is purposive since it qualifies the power to pass a law relating to Regulation of Mines and Mineral Development by the addition of a restrictive clause to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act show that they are designed to serve progressively the purpose of Entry 54
1972 A B The Coal Mines Nationalisation Act was passed in order to provide for the acquisition and transfer of the right title and interest of the owners in respect of the Coal mines specified in the Schedule to that Act
This was done with a view to re organising and reconstructing such coal mines so as to ensure the rational co ordinated and scientific development and utilisation of coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country
The high purpose of that Act was to ensure that the ownership and control of such resources are vested in the State and thereby so distributed as best to subserve the common good
1072 D F The several provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act are 1 by section 33 a of the which was introduced by the Nationalisation Amendment Act no person other than those mentioned in clauses i to iii can carry on coal mining operations after April 29 1976 being the date on which section 3 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act came into force 2 by section 3 3 b all mining leases and sub leases stood terminated except those granted before April 29 1976 in favour of the Central Government a Government company or corporation owned managed or controlled by the Central Government 3 section 33 c prohibits the granting of a lease for winning or mining coal in favour of any person other than the Government a Government company or a corporation of the above description provided that a sub lease could be granted by these authorities to any person if the two conditions mentioned in the proviso are satisfied and 4 when a mining lease stands terminated under section 33 it shall 1047 be lawful for the Central Government or the Government company or the corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government to obtain a prospecting licence or a mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands terminated
Section 4 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act introduced an additional penal provision in the parent Act
The provisions of Ss 3 and 4 are not a direct negation of the principles of the parent Act and they do not destroy the integral scheme of taking over the management of mines of acquiring the rights of lease holders and continuing to run the mines
On the contrary the Nationalisation Amendment Act is manifestly in furtherance of the object of nationalisation mentioned in the preamble to the parent Act and effectuates the purpose mentioned in sections 31 and 32 of that Act by the addition of a new sub section sub section 3 which terminates all coal mining leases and sub leases except those referred in sub section 3 b
The circumstance that the marginal note to section 3 and the title of Chapter II of the Nationalisation Act are not amended by the Nationalisation Amendment Act despite the addition of a new sub section is of little or no consequence
That sub section is a logical extension of the scheme envisaged by the original sub sections 1 and 2 of section 3
1073 C H 1074A B 2
Besides marginal notes to the sections of a statute and the titles of its chapters cannot take away the effect of the provisions contained in the Act so as to render those provisions legislatively incompetent if they are otherwise within the competence of the legislature to enact
One must principally have regard to the object of an Act in order to find out whether the exercise of the legislative power is purposive unless of course the provisions of the Act show that the avowed or intended objects is a mere pretence for covering a veiled transgression committed by the legislative upon its own powers
Whether a particular object can be successfully achieved by an Act is largely a matter of legislative policy
1074 B D 3
The Nationalisation Amendment Act needs no preamble especially when it is backed up by a statement of objects and reasons
Generally an amendment Act is passed in order to advance the purpose of the parent Act as reflected in the preamble to that Act
Acquisition of coal mines is not an end in itself but is only a means to an end
The fundamental object of the Nationalisation Act as also of the Nationalisation Amendment Act is to bring into existence a state of affairs which will be congenial for regulating mines and for mineral development
In regard to the scheduled mines that purpose was achieved by the means of acquisition
In regard to mines which were not included in the Schedule the same purpose was achieved by termination of leases and sub leases and by taking over the right to work the mines
Termination of leases vesting of lease hold properties in the State Governments and the grant of leases to the Central Government or Government Companies are together the means conceived in order to achieve the object of nationalisation of one of the vital material resources of the community
1074 D G 4
Section 18 of the Mines and Mineral Regulation and Development Act 67 1957 contains a statutory behest and projects a purposive legislative policy
The later Acts on the subject of regulation of mines and mineral development are linked up with the policy enunciated in section 18
Therefore nothing contained in the later analogous Acts can be construed as in derogation of the principle enunciated in section 18 of the Mines and Minerals Regulation and Development Act 67 of 1957 which provides that it shall be the duty of the 1048 Central Government to take all such steps as may be necessary for the conservation and development of minerals in India
Therefore even in regard to matters falling under the Nationalisation Amendment Act which terminates existing leases and makes it lawful for the Central Government to obtain fresh leases the obligation of section 18 of the Act of 1957 will continue to apply in its full rigour
1074 G H 1075 A B 5
Entry 54 refers to two things  1 regulation of mines and 2 mineral development
It is true that the Entry is purposive since the exercise of the power under Entry 54 has to be guided and governed by public interest
But neither the power to regulate mines nor the power to ensure mineral development postulates that no sooner is a mining lease terminated by the force of the statute then the Central Government must begin to work the mine of which the lease is terminated
It is possible that after the Nationalisation Amendment Act came into force there was a hiatus between the termination of existing leases and the granting of fresh ones
But the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not provide that any kind of type of mine shall not be developed or worked
Conservation prospecting and investigation developmental steps and finally scientific exploitation of the mines and minerals is the process envisaged by the Nationalisation Amendment Act
It is undeniable that conservation of minerals which is brought about by the termination of existing leases and subleases is vital for the development of mines
A phased and graded programme of conservation is in the ultimate analysis one of the most satisfactory and effective means for the regulation of mines and the development of minerals
1075 D G 6
The Nationalisation Amendment Act is not destructive of the provisions of the Parent Act
The destruction which the Nationalisation Amendment Act brings about is of the lease or the sub lease and not of its subject matter namely the mine itself
In terminating the lease of a house one does not destroy the house itself
It may be arguable that prohibiting the use of the house for any purpose whatsoever may for practical purposes amount to the destruction of the house itself
The Nationalisation Amendment Act neither contains provisions directed at prohibiting the working of mines the leases in respect of which are terminated
A simple provision for granting sub leases shows that the object of the Nationalisation Amendment Act is to ensure that no mine will lie idle or unexplored
Interregnums can usefully be utilised for prospecting and investigation
They do not lead to destruction of mines
In fact it is just as well that the Amendment Act does not require the new leases to undertake an adventure reckless and thoughtless which goes by the name of scratching of mines  which ultimately results in the slaughtering of mines
1075H 1976A D Natural resources however large are not inexhaustible which makes it imperative to conserve them
Without a wise and planned conservation of such resources there can neither be a systematic regulation of mines nor a scientific development of minerals
The importance of conservation of natural resources in any scheme of regulation and development of such resources can be seen from the fact that the Parliament had to pass in August 1974 an Act called the Coal Mines Conservation and Development Act 28 of 1974 in order principally to provide for the conservation of coal and development of coal mines Section 41 of that Act enables the Central Government for the purpose of conservation of coal and for the development of coal mines to exercise such powers and take or cause to be taken such measures as it may be necessary or proper or as may be prescribed
By section 51 a duty is cast on the 1049 owners of coal mines to take such steps as may be necessary to ensure the conservation of coal and development of the coal mines owned by them
Measures taken for judicious preservation and distribution of natural resources may involve restrictions on their use and even prohibition upto a degree of the unplanned working of the repositories of such resources
1076 D F 1077 B Attorney General for Ontario vs Attorney General for Canada  363 Municipal Corporation of City of Toronto vs Virgo explained and referred to
Section 34 of the Act uses an enabling or permissive expression in order that regulation of mines and mineral development may be ensured after a scientific prospecting investigation and planning
It is doubtless that in the language of Lord Cairns in Julius 1880 5 Appeal Cases 214 222 there is something in the nature of the things which the Nationalisation Amendment Act empowers to be done something in the object for which it is to be done and something in the conditions under which it is to be done which couples the power conferred by the Act with a duty the duty being not to act in haste but with reasonable promptitude depending upon the nature of the problem under investigation
An obligation to act does not cease to be so merely because there is no obligation to act in an ad hoc or impromptu manner
It is in the context of a conglomeration of these diverse considerations that one must appreciate why in section 34 which was introduced by the Nationalisation Amendment Act Parliament used the permissive expression it shall be lawful
1078 H 1079 A C A broad and liberal approach to the field of legislation demarcated by Entry 54 List I an objective and practical understanding of the provisions contained in the Nationalisation Amendment Act and a realistic perception of constitutional principles will point to the conclusion that the Parliament had the legislative competence to enact the Nationalisation Amendment Act
1079 C D Julius vs Bishop of Oxford 1880 5 Appeal cases 214222 referred to
The Coking of 1972 and the of 1973 cover the whole field of Coal which was intended to be nationalised
The titles of the two Acts and the various provisions contained therein show that what was being nationalised was three distinct categories of mines mines containing seams of coking coal exclusively mines containing seams of coking coal along with seams of other coal and mines containing seams of other coal
Though Parliament had power under Article 31A1e of the Constitution to terminate mining leases without payment of any compensation or amount  it decided to nationalise coal mines on payment of amounts specified in the Schedules to the Nationalisation Acts of 1972 and 1973
Besides even when something apart from coking coal mines was acquired namely coke oven plants  provision was separately made in section 11 of the Nationalisation Act of 1972 read with the 2nd Schedule for payment of amounts to owners of coke oven plants
Thus whatever was intended to be acquired was paid for
This scheme is prima facie inconsistent with the Parliament intending to acquire leasehold rights in other minerals like fireclay without the payment of any amount
1082 B E Coupled with this is the unambiguous wording of section 33b and section 33c of the Nationalisation Act of 1973 which were introduced therein by 1050 section 3 of the Nationalisation Amendment Act
These provisions carry the scheme of the Nationalisation Acts to their logical conclusion by emphasising that the target of those Acts is coal mines pure and simple
What stands terminated under section 33b is certain mining leases and sub leases in so far as they relate to the winning or mining of coal
The embargo placed by section 33c is on the granting of leases for winning or mining coal to persons other than those mentioned in section 33a
1082 E F H 1083 A The definition of coal mine  in section 2b of the has an uncertain import and the scheme of that Act and of the makes it plausible that rights in minerals other than coke and coal were not intended to be acquired under the two Nationalisation Acts
A comparison of the definition of coal mine in section 2b of the Act of 1973 with the definition of coking coal mine in section 3c of the of 1972 makes it clear that whereas in regard to coking coal mines the existence of any seam of other coal was regarded as inconsequential the existence of any seam of another mineral was not considered as inconsequential in regard to a coal mine
The definition of coal mine in section 2b of the Act of 1973 scrupulously deleted the clause whether exclusively or in addition to any other seam
The same Legislature which added the particular clause in the definition of coking coal mine  in the 1973 Act deleted it in the definition of coal mine in the 1973 Act
In so far as coal mines are concerned by reason of the definition of coal mine contained in section 2b of the Act of 1973 and the definition of coking coal mine in section 3c of the Act of 1972 which presents a striking contrast to the definition in section 2b composite coal mines that is to say coal mines in which there are seams of coal and fireclay do not fall within the scope of the definition of coal mine in section 2b of the Act of 1973
1083 A B C E G H 9
The lessees of composite mines therefore who hold composite mining leases of winning coal and fireclay cannot continue their mining operations unabated despite the provisions of the Nationalisation Amendment Act
It is one thing to say that a composite mine is outside the scope of the definition of coal mine in section 2b of the Nationalisation Act of 1972 and quite another to conclude therefrom that the other provisions introduced into that Act by the Nationalisation Amendment Act will have no impact on composite leases for winning coal and fireclay
Section 33 a which was introduced into the parent Act by the Nationalisation Amendment Act provides expressly that on and from the commencement
Of section 3 of the Amendment Act that is from April 29 1976 no person other than those mentioned in clauses i to iii shall carry on coal mining operation in India in any from These provisions of sections 33a and 302 of the parent Act will apply of their own force whether or not the lessee holds a composite lease for winning coal and fireclay and whether or not the mine is a composite mine containing alternate seams of coal and fireclay
In other words if a person holding a composite lease can do fireclay mining without mining coal he may do so
But if he cannot win or mine fireclay without doing a coal mining operation that is without winning or mining coal he cannot do any mining operation at all
If he does so he will be liable for the penal consequences provided for in section 302 of the Nationalisation Act of 1973
The provision contained in section 33a totally prohibiting the generality of persons from carrying on coal mining operation in India in any form and the penal provision of section 302 1051 virtually leave with the lessees of composite mines the husk of a mining interest
That they cannot win or mine coal is conceded and indeed there is no escape from that position in view of the aforesaid provisions
1084 B H 1085 A The lessees of composite mines cannot win or mine fireclay though their composite lease is outside the scope of section 2b of the Nationalisation Act of 1973
The lessees of composite mines will for all practical purposes have to nurse their deeds of lease without being able to exercise any of the rights flowing from them
On their own showing they will be acting at their peril if they attempt to win fireclay
If they cannot win fireclay without winning coal they cannot win fireclay either even if they hold composite leases under which they are entitled to win coal and fireclay
1085 C D 10
Though the Parliament provided for the payment of amounts for acquisition of certain interests under the Nationalisation Acts of 1972 and 1973 it did not intent to pay any compensation or amount for the termination of lease hold rights in respect of composite mines
Mines which have alternate seams of coal and fireclay are in a class by themselves and they appear to be far fewer in number as compared with the coking coal mines and coal mines properly so called
The authority of law for the termination of the rights of composite lessees is the provision contained in section 33a the violation of which attracts the penal provisions of section 302 of the Nationalisation Act of 1973
The Parliament has deprived composite lessees of their right to win fireclay because they cannot do so without winning coal
The winning of coal by the generality of people is prohibited by section 33a of the Act of 1973
1085 E H This is just as well because Parliament could not have intended that such islands of exception should swallow the main stream of the Nationalisation Acts
Obviously no rights were intended to be left outstanding once the rights in respect of coking coal mines and coal mines were brought to an end
1085 G H 11
A close and careful examination of the provisions of the and of the amendments made to that Act by Nationalisation Amendment Act makes it clear that by the Nationalisation Amendment Act neither the petitioners  right to property has been acquired without the payment of any amount nor they have been unreasonably deprived of their right to carry on the business of mining
1087 E F The nationalised coal mines by providing by section 31 that on the appointed day that is on May 1 1973 the right title and interest of the owners in relation to the coal mines specified in the Schedule shall stand transferred to and shall vest absolutely in the Central Government free from all incumbrances
The scheduled mines 711 in number and situated in reputed coal bearing areas were the ones which were engaged openly lawfully and uinterruptedly in doing coal mining business
Since it was possible to ascertain and verify the relevant facts pertaining to these undertakings they were taken over on payment of amounts mentioned in the Schedule to the Act which varied from mine to mine depending upon the valve of their assets their potential and their profitability
In the very nature of things the list of mines in the Schedule could not be exhaustive because there were and perhaps even now there are unauthorised mines worked by persons who did not possess the semblance of a title or right to do mining business
Persons falling within that category cannot cite the Constitution as their charter 1052 to continue to indulge in unauthorised mining which is unscientific unsystematic and detrimental to the national interest by reason of its tendency to destroy the reserve of natural resources
But alongside these persons there could conceivably be mine operators who may have been doing their business lawfully but who were not easily or readily identifiable
Section 32 of the Nationalisation Act 1973 made provision for taking over the management of such mines by declaring for the removal of doubts that if after the appointed day the existence of any other coal mine comes to the knowledge of the Central Government the provisions of the Coal Mines Taking Over of Management Act 1973 shall until that mine is nationalist by an appropriate legislation apply to such mine
Owners of mines whose mines were not included in the Schedule but whose right title and interest was to vest eventually in the Central Government under an appropriate legislation envisaged by section 32 of the Nationalisation Act were by this method placed on par with the owners of mines of which the management was taken over under the Coal Mines Taking Over of Management Act 1973
That Act provides by section 71 that every owner of a coal mine shall be given by the Central Government an amount in cash for the vesting in it under section 3 of the management of such mine
By section 72 for every months during which the management of a coal mine remains vested in the Central Government the amount referred to in sub section 1 shall be computed at the rate of twenty paise per tone of coal on the highest monthly production of coal from such mine during any month in the years 1969 1970 1971 and 1972
The two provisos to that subsection and the other sub sections of section 7 provide for other matters relating to payment of amounts to the owners of coal mines of which the management was taken over
The Nationalisation Amendment Act carried the scheme of these two Acts to its logical conclusion by terminating the so called leases and sub leases which might have remained outstanding
1087 G H 1088 A G Thus the purpose attained by these Acts is 1 to vest in the Central Government the right of management of all coal mines 2 to nationalise the mines mentioned in the Schedule 3 to provide for the taking over of management of coal mines the existence of which comes to the knowledge of the Central Government after the appointed day and lastly 4 to terminate all mining leases
The Management Act and the Nationalisation Act provide for payment of amounts by no means illusory to the owners of coal mines whose rights were taken over
In the normal course of human affairs particularly business affairs it is difficult to conceive that owners of coal mines who had even the vestige of a title thereto would not bring to the notice of the Central Government the existence of their mines when such mines were not included in the Schedule to the Nationalisation Act
Those who did not care to bring the existence of their mines to the knowledge of the Central Government even though amounts are payable under the Management Act for the extinguishment of the right of management did not evidently possess even the semblance of a title to the mines
The claims of lessees holding or allegedly holding under such owners would be as tenuous as the title of their putative lessors
1088 G H 1089 A C 12
The Nationalisation Amendment Act by section 33 b undoubtedly terminates all existing leases and sub leases except those already granted in favour of persons referred to in clauses i to iii of section 33a
Similarly section 33a imposes an embargo on all future coal mining operations except in regard to the persons mentioned in clauses i to iii
But the 1053 generality of leases which are alleged to have remained outstanding despite the coming into force of the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act were mostly precarious whose holders could at best present the familiar alibi that the origin of their rights or of those from whom they derived title was lost in antiquity
Neither in law nor in equity and justice nor under the Constitution can these lessees be heard to complain of the termination of their lease hold rights without the payment of any amount
The provision contained in section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act was made ex majore cautela so as not to leave any lease of a coal mine surviving after the enactment of the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
There was no reasonable possibility of a lawful lease surviving the passing of those Acts but if per chance anyone claimed that he held a lease that stood terminated under section 33b
1089 C G 13
Section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act brings about an extinguishment simpliciter of coal mining leases within the meaning of Article 31A1 e of the Constitution
The termination of the mining leases and sub leases brought about by section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act is not a mere pretence for the acquisition of the mining business of the lessees and sub lessees
The true intent of the Nationalisation Amendment Act was not to acquire anyone s business
This would be so whether the word acquire  is understood in its broad popular sense or in the narrow technical sense which it has come to possess
Whatever rights were intended to be acquired were paid for by the fixation of amount or by the laying down of a formula for ascertaining amounts payable for acquisition
Having provided for payment of amounts for acquisition of management and ownership rights it is unbelievable that the legislature resorted to the subterfuge of acquiring the mining business of the surviving lessees and sub lessees by the device of terminating their leases and sub leases
The legislative history leading to the termination of coal mining leases points to one conclusion only that by and large every lawful interest which was acquired was paid for the extinguishment of the interest which survived or which is alleged to have survived the passing of the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act was provided for merely in order to ensure that no loophole was left in the implementation of the scheme envisaged by those Acts
Persons dealt with by section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act are differently situated from those who were dealt with by the two earlier Acts namely the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
No violation of Article 14 is therefore involved
1089 G 1090 D H 1091 A B 14
The public purpose which informs the Nationalisation Amendment Act is the same which lies behind its two precursors the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
The purpose is to re organise and re structure coal mines so as to ensure the rational co ordinated and scientific development and utilisation of coal resources consistent with the growing requirements of the country
The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Nationalisation Amendment Act points in the same direction
Public purpose runs like a continuous thread through the well knit scheme of the three Acts under consideration
1091 B D 15
Making every allowance in favour of the right to property which was available at the relevant time and having regard to the substance of the matter and not merely to the form adopted for terminating the interest of the lessees and the sub lessees the Nationalisation Amendment Act involves no acquisition of the interest of the lessees and the sub lessees
It merely brings about in 1054 the language of Article 31A1e the extinguishment of their right if any to win coal
Whichever right title and interest was lawful and identifiable was acquired by the Management Act and the Nationalisation Act
And whichever interest was acquired was paid for
Tenuous and furtive interests which survived the passing of those Acts were merely extinguished by the Nationalisation Amendment Act
1091 F H 1092 A The interest of the lessees and sub lessees which was brought to termination by section 33b of the Nationalisation Amendment Act does not come to be vested in the State
The Act provides that excepting a certain class of leases and sub leases all other leases and sub leases shall stand terminated in so far as they relate to the winning or mining of coal
There is no provision in the Act by which the interest so terminated is vested in the State Nor does such vesting flow as a necessary consequence of any of the Provisions of the Act
Sub section 4 of section 3 of the Act provides that where a mining lease stands terminated under sub section 3 it shall be lawful for the Central Government or a Government Company or a corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government to obtain a prospecting licence or a mining lease in respect of the whole or part of the land covered by the mining lease which stands so terminated
The plain intendment of the Act which is neither a pretence nor a facade is that once the outstanding leases and sub leases are terminated the Central Government and the other authorities will be free to apply for a mining lease
Any lease hold interest which the Central Government for example may thus obtain does not directly or immediately flow from the termination brought about by section 33b
Another event has to intervene between the termination of existing leases and the creation of new interests
The Central Government etc
have to take a positive step for obtaining a prospecting licence or a mining lease
Without it the Act would be ineffective to create of its own force any right or interest in favour of the Central Government a Government Company or a Corporation owned managed or controlled by the Central Government
The essential difference between acquisition by the State on the one hand and modification or extinguishment of rights on the other is that in the first case the beneficiary is the State while in the second the beneficiary is not the State
The Nationalisation Amendment Act merely extinguishes the rights of the lessees and the sublesses
It does not provide for the acquisition of those rights directly or indirectly by the State
Article 31A2A will therefore come into play
It follows that the Nationalisation Amendment Act must receive the protection of Article 31A1e of the Constitution that is to say that the Act cannot be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by Articles 14 19 and 31
1092 F H 1093 A H Ajit Singh vs State of Punjab   Madan Mohan Pathak vs Union of India  Ors  discussed and distinguished
Dwarkadas Shrinivas vs The Sholapur Spinning  Weaving Co Ltd   733 734 applied