tition Nos
1041 1044 of 1980
Under Article 32 of the Constitution Shanti Bhushan K K Venugopal A T M Sampath P N Ramalingam and R Satish for the Petitioner
Lal Narain Sinha Att
General of India M K Banerjee Addl
and Miss A Subhashini for Respondents Nos
P R Mridul P H Parekh C B Singh B L Verma Rajan Karanjawal and Miss Vineeta Caprihan for the Intervener
K B Rohtagi and Praveen Jain for the Intervener
R K Garg and P K Jain for the Intervener
section K Bagga for the Intervener
Altaf Ahmed for the Intervener
section Balakrishnan for the Intervener
P H Parekh for Respondent No 6 in WP No 104279
The following judgments were delivered KRISHNA IYER
The Root Thought The abolition of slavery has gone on for a long time
Rome abolished slavery America abolished it and we did but only the words were abolished not the thing
This agonising gap between hortative hopes and human dupes vis a vis that serf like sector of Indian society strangely described as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes SCs and STs for short and the administrative exercises to bridge this big hiatus by processes like reservations and other concessions in the field of public employment is the broad issue that demands constitutional examination in the Indian setting of competitive equality before the law and tearful inequality in life
A fasciculus of directions of the Railway Board has been attacked as ultra vires and the court has to pronounce on it not philosophically but pragmatically
The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways the point is to change it this was the founding fathers  fighting faith and serves as perspective setter for the judicial censor
193 The Backdrop The social backdrop to the forensic problem raised in this litigation is best projected by lines of poetry quoted in Nehru s Autobiography Bowed by the weight of centuries he leans Upon his hoe and gazes on the ground The emptiness of ages on his face And on his back the burden of the world
The Problem The dynamics and dialectics of social justice vis a vis the special provisions of the Constitution calculated to accelerate the prospects of employment of the harijans and the girijans in the civil services with particular emphasis on promotions of these categories in the Indian Railways that in all these cases is the cynosure of judicial scrutiny from the angle of constitutionality in the context of the guarantee of caste free equality to every person
Petitioners  Challenge The gravamen of the constitutional accusation levelled in this bunch of quasi class actions under article 32 of the Constitution and argued by a battery of counsel led by Shri Shanti Bhushan with heat and light passion and reason is the heartless discrimination shown against vast numbers of members employed by the Railway Administration through its policy directives by bestowal of unconscionably pampering  concessions at promotion levels on these social brackets belonging to the historically suppressed SCs  STs heedless of over all administrative efficiency in the Indian Railways and frustrating the promotional hopes of the larger human segments of economically downtrodden senior members
The fall out of this benign discrimination  of helping out the weakest sections has been to blow up out of all proportion to the social realities the backwardness  syndrome so as embrace many politically powerful castes disguised as Backward Classes
This constitutional amulet rooted largely in caste the petitioners lament has been misused and applied in educational and employment fields on an escalating scale
The perverted result is that a caste riven nation is a spectre that haunts the land pushing back the patriotic prospect of a homogenised Indian Society of casteless equality and projecting instead the divisive alternative of a heterogeneous caste map of Bharat
The fundamental failure of this sterile scheme of reservation wise circumvention of the fundamental right to equality ideologically and pragmatically speaking has deepened the pathological condition of communalism besetting the Indian polity 194 and split the have nots into snarling camps a consummation disastrously contrary to the constitutional design of abolition of socioeconomic inequality through activist stratagem of equalisation geared to actual attainment of integrated equality
Logically the argument leads to the formulation that each caste and community is bargaining politically for bigger bites of the educational and employment cake so much so merit becomes irrelevant or takes a back seat and backward  birth brings a boon
The constitutional stultification of an integrated India through misuse of reservation  power provided for in articles 15 and 16 meant for the direct dalits  the pollution by the political Executive of our founding creed of an egalitarian order by playing casteification politics and the morbid dilution of backwardness  marring the dream of a secular republic by the nightmare of a feudal vivisection of the people if this picture drawn by some counsel be true even in part the basic task of transforming the economic order through social justice will be baulked through destructive communal disputes among the masses
Maybe this may weaken the social revolution leave an indelible stain and incurable wound on the body politic and justify the censure by history of the engineers of our political power and electoral processes
Hearing the arguments of the petitioners one wonders Is caste the largest political party  Has protective discrimination so necessary in an insufferably unequal society created a Frankenstein s monster  Have we no dynamic measures to drown social economic and educational backwardness of whole masses except the traditional self perpetuating quasi apartheidisation called reservation   Surely our democratic secular socialist republic is no wane moon but a creative power rooted in equal manhood an egalitarian reservoir of vast human potential a demographic distribution of talent benumbed by brahman centuries of social injustice but now seeking human expression under a new dispensation where chill penury  shall no longer repress their noble rage 
Caste undoubtedly in a deep seated pathology to eradicate which the Constitution took care to forbid discrimination based on caste especially in the field of education and services under the State
The rulings of this court interpreting the relevant Articles have hammered home the point that it is not constitutional to base identification of backward classes on caste alone qua caste
If a large number of castes masquerade as backward classes and perpetuate that division in educational campuses and public offices the whole process of a caste free society will be reversed
We are not directly concerned with backward classes as such but with the provisions ameliorative of the 195 Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
Nevertheless we have to consider seriously the social consequences of our interpretation of article 16 in the light of the submission of counsel that a vested interest in the caste system is being created and perpetuated by over indulgent concessions even at promotional levels to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which are only a species of castes
Each according to his ability is being substituted by each according to his caste argue the writ petitioners and underscore the unrighteous march of the officials belonging to the SCs  STs over the humiliated heads of their senior and more meritorious brothers in service
The after math of the caste based operation of promotional preferences is stated to be deterioration in the over all efficiency and frustration in the ranks of members not fortunate enough to be born SCs  STs
Indeed the inefficiency  bogie was so luridly presented that even the railway accidents and other operational calamities and managerial failures were attributed to the only villain of the piece viz the policy of reservation in promotions
A constitutionally progressive policy of advantage in educational and official career based upon economic rather than social backwardness was commended before us by counsel as more in keeping with the anti caste pro egalitarian tryst with our constitutional destiny
And Shri Shanti Bhushan at one stage helped the court realise the consequences of its verdict if it upheld the pampering package of promotional preferences by warning us of running battles in the streets a sort of caste war against birth based privileges  for the harijan girijan millions
Our Approach Of course judicial independence has one dimension not fully realised by some friends of freedom
Threats of mob hysteria shall not deflect the court from its true accountability to the Constitution its spirit and text belighted by all the sanctioned materials The other invisible sacrifice of judicial independence relevant to this case is the unwitting surrender to the spirit of the group in which the accidents of birth or education or occupation or fellowship have given us judges a place
No effort or revolution of the mind will overthrow utterly and at all times the empire of these subconscious loyalties
 We quote what the great Justice Cardozo has courageously confessed  I have spoken of the forces of which judges avowedly avail to shape the form and content of their judgments
Even these forces are seldom fully in consciousness
They lie so near the surface however that their existence and 196 influence are not likely to be disclaimed
But the subject is not exhausted with the recognition of their power
Deep below consciousness are other forces the likes and the dislikes the predilections and the prejudices the complex of instincts and emotions and habits and convictions which make the man whether he be litigant or judge
The great tides and currents which engulf the rest of men do not turn aside in their course and pass the judges by  
We shall never be able to flatter ourselves in any system of judicial interpretation that we have eliminated altogether the personal measures of the interpreter
In the moral sciences there is no method or procedure which entirely supplants that subjective reason
We may figure the task of the judge if we please as the task of a translator the reading of signs and symbols given from without
None the less we will not set men to such a task unless they have absorbed the spirit and have filled themselves with a love of the language they must read
The British echo of this judicial weakness is heard in Prof Griffith s words These judges have by their education and training and the pursuit of their profession as barristers acquired a strikingly homogeneous collection of attitudes beliefs and principles which to them represents the public interest
The emphasis on the subtle invasions from within upon functional autonomy and forensic objectivity mentioned by Cardozo will be evident when we turn to the pathetic saga of the depressed classes even today painted by the other side
The learned Attorney General less militant but not less firm in his submissions called all this a caricature of the poignant facts of life and called upon us to assess the facts with cold objectivity and warm humanity casting aside possible sympathies suggested by Justice Cardozo and Prof Griffith
We as judges dealing with a socially charged issue of constitutional law must never forget that the Indian Constitution is a National Charter pregnant with social revolution not a Legal Parchment barren of militant values to usher in a democratic secular socialist society which belongs equally to the masses including the harijan girijan millions hungering for a humane deal after feudal colonial history s long night
Granville Austin quotes profusely from the Constituent Assembly proceedings to prove the goal of the Indian Constitution to be 197 social revolution
Radhakrishnan representing the broad consensus said that India must have a socioeconomic revolution  designed not only to bring about the real satisfaction of the fundamental needs of the common man but to go much deeper and bring about a fundamental change in the structure of Indian society 
The Cultural Core of the Constitutional Protection Let us get some glimpses of history to get a hang of the problem In thy book record their groans  may be the right quote to begin with
We cannot blink at the agony of the depressed classes over the centuries condemned by all social reformers as rank irreligion and social injustice
Swami Vivekananda for instance stung by glaring social injustice argued2 The same power is in every man to the one manifesting more the other less
Where is the claim to privilege
All knowledge is in every soul even in the most ignorant he has not manifested it but perhaps he has not had the opportunity the environments were not perhaps suitable to him
When he gets the opportunity he will manifest it
The idea that one man is born superior to another has no meaning in Vedanta that between two nations one is superior and the other inferior has no meaning whatsoever 
Men will be born differentiated some will have more power than others
We cannot stop that but that on account of this power to acquire wealth they should tyrannies and ride roughshod over those who cannot acquire so much wealth is not a part of the law and the fight has been against that
The enjoyment of advantage over another is privilege and throughout ages the aim of morality has been its destruction  
Our aristocratic ancestors went on treading the common masses of our country under foot till they became helpless till under this torment the poor poor people nearly forgot that they were human beings
They have been compelled to be merely hewers of wood and drawers of water for centuries so much so that they are made to believe that they are born 198 as slaves born as hewers of wood and drawers of water
With all our boasted education of modern times if anybody says a kind word for them I often find our men shrink at once from the duty of lifting them up these poor downtrodden people
Not only so but I also find that all sorts of most demoniacal and brutal arguments culled from the crude ideas of hereditary transmission and other such gibberish from the western world are brought forward in order to brutalise and tyrannies over the poor all the more
Aye Brahmins if the Brahmin has more aptitude for learning on the ground of heredity than the Pariah spend no more money on the Brahmin s education but spend all on the Pariah
Give to the weak for there all the gift is needed
Our poor people these down trodden masses of India therefore require to hear and to know what they really are
Aye let every man and woman and child without respect of caste or birth weakness and strength hear and learn that behind the strong and the weak behind the high and the low behind everyone there is that Infinite Soul assuring that infinite possibility and the infinite capacity of all to become great and good
Let us proclaim to every soul Arise awake and stop not till the goal is reached
Arise awake  Awake from the hyprotism of weakness
None is really weak the soul is infinite omnipotent and omniscient
Stand up assert yourself proclaim the God within you do not deny Him  Too much of inactivity too much of weakness too much of hypnotism has been and is upon our race 
Power will come glory will come goodness will come purity will come and everything that is excellent will come when this sleeping soul is roused to self conscious activity 
Our proletariat are doing their duty  is there no heroism in it  Many turn out to be heroes when they have some great task to perform
Even a coward easily gives up his life and the most selfish man behaves disinterestedly when there is a multitude to cheer them on but blessed indeed is he who manifests the same unselfishness and devotion to duty in the smallest of acts
unnoticed by all and it is you who are actually doing this ye ever trampled labouring classes of India  I bow to you
There was the Everest presence of Mahatma Gandhi the Father of the Nation who staked his life for the harijan cause
There was Baba 199 Saheb Ambedkar a mahar by birth and fighter to his last breath against the himalayan injustice to the harijan fellow millions stigmatised by their genetic handicap who was the Chairman of the drafting committee of the Constituent Assembly
There was Nehru one of the foremost architects of Free India who stood four square between caste suppression by the upper castes and the socialist egalitarianism implicit in secular democracy
These forces nurtured the roots of our constitutional values among which must be found the fighting faith in a casteless society not by obliterating the label but by advancement of the backward particularly that pathetic segment described colourlessly as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
To recognise these poignant realities of social history and so to interpret the Constitution as to fulfil itself not eruditely to undermine its substance through the tyranny of literality is the task of judicial patriotism so relevant in Third World conditions to make liberation a living fact
The learned Attorney General drew our attention to the yawning gap between the legitimate expectations of the socially depressed SC  ST and their utter under representation in the Public Services except in such mean jobs as of scavengers and sweepers where no other caste was forthcoming
Equality of opportunity would be absent so long as equalisation strategy was not put into action and the State stage by stage and with great care and experimental eye took steps to secure the ends of articles 161 and 164 read in the light of the Preambular promise of equality fraternity and dignity the Part IV directive of promotion of educational and economic interests of the SC  ST and the Special Chapter especially article 336 devoted to better representation of the SC  ST in the services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union and States
We could not apprehend the social dimension of the stark squalour of SCST by viewing article 16 4 through a narrow legal aperture but only by an apercu of the broader demands of social democracy without which the Republic would cease to be a reality to one fifth of Indian humanity
The final address to the Constituent Assembly by Dr Ambedkar drives home this point not to interpret but to illumine the scheme of the equality code and the casteless society plea  The third thing we must do is not to be content with mere political democracy
We must make our political democracy a social democracy as well
Political democracy can 200 not last unless there lies at the base of it social democracy
What does social democracy mean  It means a way of life which recognises liberty equality and fraternity as the principles of life
These principles of liberty equality and fraternity are not to be treated as separate items in a trinity
They form a union of trinity in the sense that to divorce one from the other is to defeat the very purpose of democracy
Liberty cannot be divorced from equality equality cannot be divorced from liberty
Nor can liberty and equality be divorced from fraternity
Without fraternity liberty and equality could not become a natural course of things
It would require a constable to enforce them
We must begin by acknowledging the fact that there is complete absence of two things in Indian society
One of these is equality
On the social plane we have in India a society based on the principles of graded inequality which means elevation of some and degradation for others
On the economic plane we have a society in which there are some who have immense wealth as against many who live in abject poverty
On the 26th January 1950 we are going to enter into a life of contradictions
In politics we will have equality and in social and economic life we will have inequality
In politics we will be recognizing the principle of one man one vote and one vote one value
In our social and economic structure continue to deny the principle of one man one value
How long shall we continue to live this life of contradictions  How long shall be continue to deny equality in our social and economic life  If we continue to deny it for long we will do so only by putting our political democracy in peril
We must remove this contradiction at the earliest possible moment or else those who suffer from inequality will blow up the structure or political democracy which this Assembly has so laboriously built up emphasis added
Indeed from another angle of vision article 164 serves to correct a gross social distortion and denial of human rights to whole groups ostracised by feudal history
A holistic concept of human rights includes among its components socioeconomic rights for without basic conditions of social justice survival with human dignity is an impossibility
Thus a great socioeconomic plan to uplift the harijan girijan groups is a must for living equality proclaimed by articles 14 to 16 to become an active reality
It must be stated that the petitioners did not contest the need for State action to raise the lot of these backward most social sectors but objected its widespread 201 erosion of the right to basic equality which belongs to the have nots in the country
Where do we draw the line  These are the disturbing issues going to the root of progressive nationalism raised by the writ petitioners and turned against them by the State but we are not inclined or entitled to venture into the political wisdom of governmental policies vis a vis backward  community calculus save where constitutionality falling within the judicial jurisdiction confronts us
We must therefore confine the forensic focus to the specific issue of profound import projected by the aggrieved petitioners whose chief attack is against being passed over seniority and superior merit notwithstanding in favour of alleged neophytes or nitwits merely because by birth the latter belong to the SCST species trampling underfoot in the process the fundamental rights of equal opportunity entrenched in articles 14 and 161 of the Constitution
The dimensions of the problem the human numbers involved and the agitational potential said to be simmering in the civil services were vividly drawn at the bar by one side
The tragic tale of die hard decades of inequality even after Freedom the socioeconomic miles to go  and the constitutional promises to keep  over which judges will not legally sleep before the dalit brethren may break their chains and become at least distant neighbours to the less socially handicapped sector were highlighted pragmatically statistically hierarchically even desperately by the proponents of the impugned circulars Annexures F to O covered by Prayers I to X
These submissions serve as poignant background but the decision on the vires of the Railway Board s directives will depend on constitutional interpretation applied to Indian actualities not to idealised abstractions or theoretical possibilities
True the politicisation of casteism its infiltration into unsuspected human territories and the injection of caste consciousness in schools and colleges via backward class reservation are a canker in the rose of secularism
More positive measures of levelling up by constructive strategies may be the developmental needs
But the judicial process while considering constitutional questions must keep politics and administrative alternatives as out of bounds except to the extent economics sociology and other disciplines bear scientifically upon the proposition demanding court pronouncement
Here the sole issue spread out into the validity of the supposed sinful circulars Annexures F to O covered by Prayers I to X is whether article 16 in its sweep and savings does permit State action in favour of socially and economically backward classes especially the constitutionally favoured category called the SC  ST to the point of liberal concessions slurring over 202 age  merit  and the like not merely at the initial entrance gate but even at the higher promotional docks
Whether alternative policies should have been chosen by Government or would have served better to remove the handicaps of the SC  STs whether the advantages conferred on these classes are too generous and overly compassionate and whether the considerable numbers of the economically destitute receive the same sympathy as social have nots categorised as SC  ST these and other speculative maybes are beyond the courts orbit save where article 16 is hit by these omissions and commissions
Nor is it the court s province to question the conscionableness or propriety of constitutional provisions which display ultra concern for members of the SC  ST
The court functions under the Constitution not over it interprets the Constitution not amends it implements its provisions not dilutes it through personal philosophy projected as constitutional construction
Objective tuned to constitutional wavelengths is our function and if only if constitutional guarantees have clearly been violated will the court declare as non est such governmental projects as go beyond the mandates of Part III read in harmony with Part IV
If on a reasonable construction the Administration s special provisions under article 164 exceed constitutional limits it is the duty of the court to strike dead such project
Even so while viewing the legal issues we must not forget what is elementary that law cannot go it alone but must function as a member of the sociological ensemble of disciplines
If one out of a few reasonably tenable constructions of the constitutional provisions vis a vis the impugned executive directives may sustain the latter the court should and would refrain from using the judicial guillotine
There is a comity of coordinate constitutional instrumentalities geared to shared constitutional goals which persuades the judicature to sustain rather than slay save where the breach is brazen the transgression is plain or the effective co existence of the fundamental right and the administrative scheme is illusory
This Court has on former occasions upheld executive and legislative action hovering perilously near but not plunging into unconstitutionality see In re Kerala Education Bill 1959 SCR 995 at 1064
It is a constant guideline which we must vigilantly remember as we have stated earlier that our Constitution is a dynamic document with destination social revolution
It is not anaemic nor neutral but vigorously purposeful and value laden as they very descriptive adjectives of our Republic proclaim
Where ancient social injustice freezes the genial current of the soul  for whole human segments our Constitution is not non aligned
Activist equalisation as a realistic strategy of 203 producing human equality is not legal anathema for articles 14 and 16
To hold otherwise is constitutional obscurantism and legal literalism allergic to sociologically intelligent interpretation
The Preamble which promises justice liberty and equality of status and opportunity within the framework of Secular Socialist Republic projects a holistic perspective
article 16 which guarantees equal opportunity for all citizens in matters of State Service inherently implies equalisation as a process towards equality but also hastens to harmonize the realistic need to jack up depressed  classes to overcome initial handicaps and join the national race towards progress on an equal footing and devotes article 164 for this specific purpose
In a given situation of large social categories being submerged for long the guarantee of equality with the rest is myth not reality unless it is combined with affirmative State action for equalisation geared to promotion of eventual equality
Article 164 is not a jarring note but auxiliary to fair fulfillment of article 161
The prescription of article 161 needs in the living conditions of India the concrete sanction of article 164 so that those wallowing in the social quagmire are enabled to rise to levels of equality with the rest and march together with their brethren whom history had not so harshly hamstrung
To bury this truth is to sloganise article 161 and sacrifice the facts of life
This is not mere harmonious statutory construction of article 161 and 4 but insightful perception of our constitutional culture reflecting the current of resurgent India bent on making out of a sick and stratified society of inequality and poverty a brave new Bharat
If freedom justice and equal opportunity to unfold one s own personality belong alike to bhangi and brahmin prince and pauper if the panchama proletariat is to feel the social transformation article 164 promises the State must apply equalising techniques which will enlarge their opportunities and thereby progressively diminish the need for props
The success of State action under article 164 consists in the speed with which result oriented reservation withers away as no longer a need not in the everwidening and everlasting operation of an exception article 164 as if it were a super fundamental right to continue backward all the time
To lend immortality to the reservation policy is to defeat its raison de etre to politicise this provision for communal support and Party ends is to subvert the solemn undertaking of article 161 to costeify reservation  even beyond the dismal groups of backward most people euphemistically described as SC  ST is to run a grave constitutional risk
Caste ipso facto is not class in a secular State
204 The authentic voice of our culture voiced by all the great builders of modern India stood for abolition of the hardships of the pariah the mlecha the bonded labour the hungry hard working half slave whose liberation was integral to our Independence
To interpret the Constitution rightly we must understand the people for whom it is made the finer ethos the frustrations the aspirations the parameters set by the Constitution for the principled solution of social disabilities
This synthesis of ends and means of life s maladies and law s remedies is a part of the know how of constitutional interpretation if alienation from the people were not to afflict the justicing process
A statute rarely stands alone
Back of Minerva was the brain of Jove and behind Venus was the spume of the ocean
These broader observations are necessary to set our sights right to appreciate that our Constitution lays the gravestone on the old unjust order and the cornerstone of the new humane order
This constitutional consciousness is basic to interpretative wisdom
We may now start with the facts of the case and spell out the particular problems demanding our consideration
Constitutional questions cannot be viewed in vacuo but must be answered in the social milieu which gives it living meaning
After all the world of facts enlivens the world of words
And logomachy is not law but a fatal though fascinating futility if alienated from the facts of life
So before pronouncing on the legality of the impugned ten orders we must sketch the social setting in which they were issued and the socioeconomic facts which clothe article 164 with flesh and blood The wisest in council the ablest in debate and the most agreeable companion in the commerce of human life is that man who has assimilated to his understanding the greatest number of facts  The facts The Indian Railways with an impressive record of expansion employs colossal numbers of servants in various typically hierarchical classes and grades
While the Indian Railways Act 1890 substantially regulates many of the functions of the railway administration in India the Railway Board is constituted under the  with a view more effectively to control the administration of railways
The Central Government is statutorily empowered 205 to invest the Railway Board with all or any of the powers and functions of the Central Government under the Indian Railways Act 1890
Power is also given by section 2 to vest in the Railway Board the capacity to make general rules for railways administered by the Government
Of course the investment of powers upon the Railway Board is broadly speaking subject to the condition that the Central Government retains the ultimate authority in all matters connected with the Railway Administration
The Ministry of Home Affairs in the Government of India deals usually with all matters of personnel conditions of service of the Central Government staff and the like
Policy decisions regarding matters covered by article 164 apparently originate from the Ministry of Home Affairs and emanate to the various institutions like the Railway Board which responsively implement them
In the present case ten directives were issued by the Railway Board on different occasions which disclosed benign discrimination  in favour of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and are challenged by the petitioners as reverse discrimination  if we may use that expression popularised in American legalese
These directives were designed to protect and promote the interests of members of the SC  ST in the matter of their employment under the Indian Railway Administration and they specially related to the softer criteria for promotion
The Railway Board acted as is discernible from the relevant orders in obedience to the policy decisions of the Ministry of Home Affairs
Some argument was addressed on the validity of the Railway Board s orders on procedural and other technical grounds
We see no substance in them
The Board was bound to carry out the Central Government s directives under article 164 and did it
The broader issue of benign discrimination  deserves close study
The meat of the matter to put it that way is the gross discrimination alleged to be implicit in the several Circulars of the Railway Board and the non applicability of article 164 to save these circulars
The focus of this litigation must primarily turn on that issue and the court must navigate towards egalitarian justice at the level of promotion posts in the public services keeping the land mark rulings of this Court as mariner s compass
The disturbing perpetuation of socioeconomic suppression of a whole fifth of Indian manhood the dalits and the righteous resistance to prolonged reverse casteism  resulting in deepening demoralization of the economically oppressed the soshits have been projected by counsel on the forensic screen as a conflict between equalisation and equality
Our founding fathers familiar with social dialectics and socialist enlightenment surely would have intended to bring both these have not categories together as a 206 broad brotherhood against the die hard Establishment and would never have contemplated a fratricidal strategy which would blind and divide brothers in distress the dalits and the soshits and harm the integration of the nation and its developmental march
Unless by dialectical approach sociologists lay bare this false dilema of dalits versus soshits the growing distrust in democracy will deepen the jurisprudence of constitutional revolution and egalitarian justice will fade in the books and the founding hopes of January 26 1950 will sour into cynical dupes of the masses decades after Wider perspectives must therefore inform our study of the equality code articles 14 to 16 to rid it of social contradictions and read into it the need for a dalit soshit partnership in demanding social justice
Felix Frankfurter set the judicial function when he said 1 A Judge should be compounded of the faculties that are demanded of the historian and the philosopher and the prophet
The last demand upon him to make some forecast of the consequences of his action is perhaps the heaviest
To pierce the curtain of the future to give shape and visage to mysteries still in the womb of time is the gift of the imagination
It requires poetic sensibilities with which judges are rarely endowed and which their education does not normally develop
These judges must have something of the creative artist in them they must have antennae registering feeling and judgment beyond logical let alone quantitative proof
Be that as it may the court must go to the constitutional basics for guidance decode the articles indifferent to agitational portents and ideological speculations but responsive to the urgent implementation of article 38 into the reality of Indian life
Article 38 reads 381
The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice social economic and political shall inform all the institutions of the national life
2 The State shall in particular strive to minimise the inequalities in income and endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status facilities and opportunities not only amongst individuals but also amongst groups of people residing in different areas or engaged in different vocations
emphasis added 207 The learned Attorney General while emphasising the egalitarian commitment of the Constitution over the whole range of public services throughout their career defended the impugned orders by law and logic pragmatics and statistics and countered the hypotheticals of the petitioners by the actual furnished by official facts and figures
He also relied on a few precedents in particular Rangachari s case1 and Thomas s case2 both of which bind this Bench
He also sought to explain away the effect of Balaji s case3 and Devadason s case4 on which the other side had heavily relied to nullify some of the circulars
The Union of India placed before us its case that notwithstanding measures for bringing the gap in the matter of gross under representation in the Administration no adequate improvement had been registered and and so more dynamic State action to fulfil its constitutional tryst with the frustrated fifth of the people described as SC  ST became necessitous
The raw reality of meagre harijan and girijan presence in the public services conscientised the Administration into taking a series of cautions steps to catalyse the prospects of these categories entering the many Departments of Government not merely at the initial stage but also at promotional points and in appointments to supervisory posts so as to become members of the higher echelons
The learned Attorney General contended that such affirmative actions slurring over fanatical and financial insistence on so called merit and seniority was in conformity with article 161 itself and in any case was protected by Art164
Maybe the human numbers outside the SC  ST honestly suffer some meyhem in their career especially at the higher notches of promotion after long stagnation and are bitter that the shudra or panchama steals a march over him now although the poignant pages of earlier history have been a negation of personhood then for millions of the dregs of society desperately driving Dr Ambedkar to vow I shall not die a Hindu
But the synthesis of article 16 not the antithesis between article 161 and article 164 gives the clue to creative constitutional construction
The learned Attorney General s plea was that in a society of chronic inequality and scarcity of employment actual equality could never be midwifed without birth pangs and discriminatory unconstitutionality could not vitiate programmes meant to achieve real life 208 equality unless we took a pragmatic view
This approach is permissible if we follow Chief Justice Warren Our judges are not monks or scientists but participants in the living stream of our national life steering the law between the dangers of rigidity on the one hand and of formlessness on the other
Our system faces no theoretical dilemma but a single continuous problem how to apply to ever changing conditions the never changing principles of freedom
Let us draw the precise battle lines to contain the constitutional conflict within the actual limits
Equality of opportunity in matters of State employment is a constitutional guarantee and no citizen can be discriminated against on the score only of sex caste descent place of birth or residence
So one point pressed before us is that Scheduled Castes cannot be a favoured class in the public services because they are castes  and cannot claim preference qua castes unless specially saved by article 164
And article 164 speaks of class not caste and the two are different however politically convenient the confusion may be
Another vital contention put forward by counsel for the petitioners was that article 164 could not apply to promotional levels
A third basic plea was that efficiency of administration was a constitutional consideration under article 335 and could not be a sacrificial goat to propitiate the backward class Kali
The impugned circulars offended against efficiency both by fomenting frustration among the Civil Services indirectly producing inefficiency and by manning higher posts which demand higher skills with men of lower competitive calibre and less experience in service thus posting efficiency risks  in strategic positions violating article 335
The contentious issue is now clear
Are SC  ST mere castes within the sense of article 162  If so can article 164 help these castes through rule of promotional partiality  And in any case can article 164 rescue rules of benign discrimination if the impact thereof is generation of gross inefficiency in administration  Is not economic have notism  a better yardstick of backwardness in secular India A brief resume of the structure of the Railway Services may help understand the rival arguments in their precise setting
The pyramid begins at the base with Class IV posts and rises to the apex by stages through Class III Class II and Class I True to our hierarchical culture pervasive in Indian Services there are further sub divisions consisting of many categories in each class and many grades in each category
The agencies for recruitment are the Union Public Service 209 Commission the Railway Service Commission and the top officers authorised by the Railway Board in this behalf
Ordinarily the first entry into each category is filled by direct recruitment if we may use language loosely
Thereafter appointments to higher gradescategories are usually by promotion
The promotional processes are traditionally two fold viz a by departmental selection based on merit cum seniority and b by escalation in the order of seniority from the lower to the higher gradecategory subject of course to being weeded out if found unfit
Candidates belonging to SCST receive certain pronounced advantages both at the stage of initial recruitment and later at the promotion stage
The Indian Railway Establishment Manual a compendious collection of rules and directions bearing on the conditions of employment of railway personnel sets out all the information
Speaking population wise and in approximate terms the Scheduled Castes constitute about 15 and the Scheduled Tribes 7 12
Broadly based on the ratio of the strength of SCST to the whole population the Railway Administration provided for reservation for candidates belonging to the SCST
This percentage of reservation applied to Class IV Class III Class II and in a limited way to Class I posts
The reservation is worked out by the method known as 40 point roster
These special provisions notwithstanding the intake of these communities stagnating at the bottom of the Indian policy continued to be chronically niggardly
To increase the rate of absorption of SCST into the services further facilities concessions and relaxations were offered from time to time
Despite these seemingly attractive employment opportunities the dismal backwardness in the matter of representation in administration from among the SCST was such that the vacancies reserved for them remained in many cases unfilled by SC  ST candidates
Lest the overall representation of the members of the SCST should continue deplorably negligible Government adopted a policy of carry forward for upto three recruitment years of reserved vacancies if enough number of candidates from the said groups did not get selected
The carry forward rule was calculated to keep open reserved vacancies for at least three years so that the under representation could be made up at least in part
Homogenisation of the dalits into the national mainstream was regarded as vital to our democracy by the State and these positive strategies of special opportunities vis a vis SCST had as its raison d etre only the imperative need to exercise the haunting spectre of the socially and economically suppressed species and to abolish the utter squalour of SCST so that the community at large could march ahead without haggard groups dragging their feet
Social conscience considers balanced democratic development as the humane justification for selective discrimination
210 With this backdrop we may epitomise the ten tainted  directives and scan them for their unconstitutionality
Special provisions for depressed classes and even other castes have a pre constitution history
After the Constitution was enacted the legality of old rules based on caste became moot and the Central Government revised its policy
The post Constitution re incarnation of the communal GO concentrated not on caste orientation but on elimination of socioeconomic suppression and the diverse ways to achieve this objective
We must remember in this context not merely the four classes of Service but also the broad division of the staff into selection and non selection posts
The first policy statement of the Union of India on the issue of better representation of SCST in Government Service begins with Resolution No 422149 NG 8 of September 13 1950
To understand the functional compulsions purpose orientation and constitutional parameters relevant to such a policy formulation we have to refer to a few articles of the Constitution
Articles 14 to 16 form a code by themselves and embody the distilled essence of the Constitution s casteless and classless egalitarianism
Nevertheless our founding fathers were realists and so did not declare the proposition of equality in its bald universality but subjected it to certain special provisions not contradicting the soul of equality but adapting that never changing principle to the ever changing social milieu
That is how articles 154 and 164 have to be read together with articles 151 and 161
The first sub article speaks of equality and the second sub article amplifies its content by expressly interdicting caste as a ground of discrimination
Article 164 imparts to the seemingly static equality embedded in article 161 a dynamic quality by importing equalisation strategies geared to the eventual achievement of equality as permissible State action viewed as an amplification of article 161 or as an exception to it
The same observation will hold good for the sub articles of article 15
Thus we have a constitutional fundamental guarantee in articles 14 to 16 but it is a notorious fact of our cultural heritage that the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes have been in unfree Indian nearly dehumanised and a facet of the struggle for Freedom has been the restoration of full personhood to them together with the right to share in the social and economic development of the country
Article 46 is a Directive Principle contained in Part IV
Every Directive Principle is fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of 211 the State to apply that principle in making law
Article 46 in emphatic terms obligates the State to promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and in particular of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation
Reading article 46 together with article 164 the luscent intent of the Constitution framers emerges that the exploited lot of the harijan girijan groups in the past shall be extirpated with special care by the State
The inference is obvious that administrative participation by SCST shall be promoted with special care by the State
Of course reservations under article 164 and promotional strategies envisaged by article 46 may be important but shall not run berserk and imperil administrative efficiency in the name of concessions to backward classes
Article 335 enters a caveat in this behalf 335
The claims of the members of the scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration in the making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State
The positive accent of this Article is that the claims of SCST to equalisation of representation in services under the State having regard to their sunken social status and impotence in the power system shall be taken into consideration
The negative element which is part of the Article is that measures taken by the State pursuant to the mandate of articles 164 46 and 335 shall be consistent with and not subversive of the maintenance of efficiency of administration
Within this broad constitutional framework the Central Government worked out its policy way back in 1950 and made subsequent alterations in keeping with the needs of the situation the poor progress registered the militant impatience of the affected SCST and the improved tactics to hasten abolition of the depressed status of these groups by effective equalisation with the rest
Even here it may be noticed that the Constitution has given a special position for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
Article 341 makes it clear that a Scheduled Caste  need not be a caste  in the conventional sense and therefore may not be a caste within the meaning of articles 152 or 162
Scheduled Castes become such only if the President specifies any castes races or tribes or 212 parts or groups within castes races or tribes for the purpose of the Constitution
So a group or a section of a group which need not be a caste and may even be a hotchpotch of many castes or tribes or even races may still be a Scheduled Caste under article 341
Likewise races or tribal communities or parts thereof or part or parts of groups within them may still be Scheduled Tribes article 342 for the purpose of the Constitution
Under this definition one group in a caste may be a Scheduled Caste and another from the same caste may not be
It is the socioeconomic backwardness of a social bracket not mere birth in a caste that is decisive
Conceptual errors creep in when traditional obsessions obfuscate the vision
This aspect has been referred to in the State of Kerala vs N M Thomas by me and dealt with at more length by Ray CJ Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are not a caste within the ordinary meaning of caste
In Bhaiyalal vs Hari kishan Singh and Ors2 this Court held that an enquiry whether the appellant there belonged to the Dohar caste which was not recognised as a Scheduled Caste and his declaration that he belonged to the Chamar caste which was a Scheduled Caste could not be permitted because of the provisions contained in Article 341
No Court can come to a finding that any Caste or any tribe is a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe
Scheduled Caste is a caste as notified under Article 36625
A notification is issued by the President under Article 361 as a result of an elaborate enquiry
The object of Article 341 is to provide protection to the members of Scheduled Castes having regard to the economic and educational backwardness from which they suffer
The President notifies Scheduled Castes not with reference to any caste characteristics but their abysmal backwardness as is evident from the scheme of Part XVI
He appoints under article 338 a Special Officer whose duty is to investigate into all matters relating to safeguards for the SCST
The Constitution provides not merely for adequate representation of SCST to services and posts under the Union and States but also provides for reservation of seats for SCST in the Legislatures
The cursory study of the Articles relating to the status and safeguards of SCST puts it beyond doubt that the founding fathers have assigned to them a special place and shown towards them special concern and charged the State with special mandates to redeem 213 these handicapped human sectors from their grossly retarded situation
Indeed they are not merely backward but are the backwardmost and cannot be equated with just any other caste in the Hindu fold
It is therefore problematic whether article 162 when it refers to equality among castes deals with the Scheduled Castes which as shown above may even be made of a plurality of castes or groups or races and may vary from State to State
Also a caste subjected qua caste to the most humiliating handicaps may be a backward class although the Court will hesitate to equate caste with class except where the degree of dismalness is dreadful
The relevance of this point will be clear when we deal with the legal submissions of counsel
We will now state in an abbreviated form the various measures of the Railway Board in response to decisions of the Ministry of Home Affairs for reservation in services of SCST
After noting the policy of communal representation in the Services before the Constitution and the constitutional ban on discrimination by way of reservation on the ground of caste save in the case of SCST and in some cases Anglo Indians with whom we are unconcerned here the Home Ministry proceeded to spell out the new stance Pending the determination of the figures of population at the Census of 1951 the Government of India have decided to make the following reservations in recruitment to posts and services under them a Scheduled Castes The existing reservation of 12 12  of vacancies filled by direct recruitment in favour of the Scheduled Castes will continue in the case of recruitment of posts and services made on an all India basis by open competition ie through the Union Public Service Commission or by means of open competitive test held by any other authority
Where recruitment is made otherwise than by open competition the reservation for Scheduled Castes will be 16 23 as at present
b Scheduled Tribes Both in recruitment by open competition and in recruitment made otherwise than by open competition there will be a reservation in favour of members of Scheduled Tribes of 5 of the vacancies filled by direct recruitment
Under the Constitution all citizens of India are eligible for consideration for appointment to posts and services under the Central Government irrespective of their 214 domicile or place of birth and there can be no recruitment to any Central Service which is confined by rule to the inhabitants of any specified area
In practice however recruitment to class I and II services and posts is likely to attract candidates from all over India and will be on a truly all India basis while for the majority of Class III services  posts which are filled otherwise than through the Union Public Service Commission only those residing in the area or locality in which the Office is located are likely to apply
In the latter class of cases the percentages of reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes will be fixed by Government taking into account the population of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in that area
Reservations were excluded for promotions and minimum qualifications were a must 
But age relaxation by 3 years from the maximum fixed for others was allowed
This policy is not challenged as unconstitutional and rightly so
However this special provision showed only minimal concessions to SCST being the first cautious conservative post constitutional measure under article 164
But law is what law does
Did this reluctant relaxation only on a few grounds work Constant monitoring of law in action with an eye on the end result is social engineering
The goal here was to awaken the sleeping soul and harness the harijan resource by mainstreaming techniques constitutionally sanctioned
The policy proved non viable and a change of strategy was called for and by Annexure D the Railway Board altered the rules with a view to securing increased representation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Railway Services
At the instance of the Home Ministry the Railway Board decided on 5 10 1955 that more realistic relaxations were needed and authorised recruiting bodies to slur over low places obtained by the SCST candidates  except where such authority considers that the minimum standard necessary for the maintenance of efficiency of the administration has not been reached
Whenever candidates are selected in this manner the appointing authorities will make necessary arrangements to give additional training and coaching to the recruits so that they might come up to the standard of other recruits appointed along with them
The anxiety to level up the lowly human layers by special training so as to maintain administrative efficiency is evident in this directive
215 Likewise where direct recruitment otherwise than by examination was provided for taking of SCST candidates   fulfilling a lower standard of suitability than from other communities was permitted so long as the candidates have the prescribed minimum education and technical qualifications and the appointing authorities are satisfied that the lowering of standards will not unduly affect the maintenance of the efficiency of administration  Here again obsession with efficiency  is manifest
Then comes what is called the carry forward  rule 3a if a sufficient number of candidates considered suitable by the recruiting authorities are not available for the communities for whom reservations are made in a particular year the unfilled vacancies should be treated as unreserved and filled by the best available candidates
The number of reserved vacancies thus treated as unreserved will be added as an additional quota to the number that would be reserved in the following year in the normal course and to the extent to which approved candidates are not available in that year against this additional quota a corresponding addition should be made to the number of reserved vacancies in the second following year
    b In the event of suitable Scheduled Caste candidate not being available a Scheduled Tribe candidate can be appointed in the subsequent reserved vacancy and vice versa subject to adjustment in the subsequent points of the roster
The quota for two years if carried forward would not materially affect the stream of merit worthy  candidates nor substantially diminish the prospects of non SCST candidates in a given year
So the Railway Board introduced the principle consistently with article 335
Government moved further because real power could be shared by the weakest sections only if the doors of the higher decks were pened to them
The higher echelons are the real controllerates not the menial levels hierarchically structured as our society is
Obviously article 164 was not designed to get more harijans into Government as scavengers and sweepers but as officers  and bosses  so that administrative power may become the common property of the high and low homogenised and integrated into one community
Social stratification 216 the bane of the caste system could be undone and vertical mobility won not by hortative exercises but by experience of shared power
Viewed thus the open sesame  strategy for entry into superior cadres could only be by extending concessions at higher levels of promotions 
Annexure D did not make reservations for SCST for promotion posts but merely asked for sympathy on the part of promoting authorities
Lachrymal exercises even in government directives are in practice little more than skin deep and elitist alibis when the ancient anguish of the lowliest  the lost besieges the citadels of the status quo readily checkmate ameliorative moves
The harijan lot in administrative services at the promotional levels remained a paper hope a teasing illusion and a promise of unreality
Article 46 whether we like it or not ordains that the State shall with special care  promote the interests of the SCST
And so long as the harijan girijan remained an alien to the Civil Service and the janitors for the higher chambers of Administration were themselves non harijan girijan gentlemen he would be a naive sociologist who thought that mere plea for more sympathy made in official orders would work magic
Government on a performance audit of its policy of no reservation  for promotion posts discovered that the harijan could hardly reach higher positions
More effective methods were needed
A radical change in policy was effected by the Railway Board through Annexure F of April 27 1959 Merit  sanctified by tradition lost the battle Tradition is a great retarding force the vis inertiae of history  and so heroic measures of progressive thrust the Railway Board realised alone could effect the break through and bring the harijan girijan groups into the higher brackets of Administration Annexure was promulgated providing for reservation in promotions
This has been challenged before us
The tepid provision opening up promotion posts for reserved  categories was first confined to Class III and Class II Class I being too sacrosanct to be soiled by meritless members
Annexure F reads Sub Reservation for members of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in posts filled by promotion in Railways
Reference is invited to Board s letter No E55CMI3 dated 5 10 55
The Railway Board have in partial modification of para IV of the above letter decided as follows a Promotion from Class IV to Class III and from Class III to Class II
217 The Railway Board have decided that promotions from Class IV to Class III and from Class III to Class II service are of the nature of direct recruitment and the prescribed quota of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be provided as in direct recruitment
The field of eligibility in the case of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates should be four times the number of posts reserved without any condition of qualifying period of service in their case subject to the condition that such consideration should not normally extend to staff beyond two grades immediately below the grade for which the selection is held
This reservation was confined to selection posts  and the circular was explicit that there will be no quota for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates in respect of promotion to non selection posts
For general posts of certain types in Class III it was laid down c General Posts in Class III
There are certain other types of posts on Railways such as Passenger Guides Welfare Inspectors Safety Inspectors Platform Inspectors Publicity Inspectors Vigilance Inspectors etc which are ex cadre posts filled by drawing staff from more than one branch
Filling of these posts is in the nature of direct recruitment and the reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as applicable to direct recruitment should be applied
 More chances to pass tests additional training and coaching to raise the standard of the sub standard were also provided for in the Board s order
Homage was thus paid to the administrative efficiency  component of article 335
This departure regarding reservation at the promotion tier for selection posts was challenged before this Court but upheld in Rangachari s case
We will dwell at some length on that ruling later but we may merely mention than an appeal was made to us by counsel for the petitioners that we should reconsider by reference to a larger bench the ratio of Rangachari which has been approvingly referred to for nearly two decades by this Court acted upon by Government throughout and enjoys if we may say so with great respect our full concurrence
Constitutional propositions on which a whole nation directs its destiny are not like Olympic records to be 218 periodically challenge and broken by fresh exercises in excellence but solemn sanctions with judicial seal set thereon for the country to navigate towards the haven of human development for everyone
To play cross word puzzle with constitutional construction is to profane it unless of course a serious set back to the progress of human rights or surprise reversal of constitutional fundamentals has happened
We find the question discussed decided and consistently followed since Rangachari and see no reason to open the Pandora s box
So it was that we rejected the plea for reconsideration
Even so the alternative method of containing Art 164 within the contours of Rangachari was open to counsel and that has been done in argument as will be evident from the discussion on the vires of the subsequent orders of the Board
All the fire was turned by petitioners  counsel on promotion excesses  through Railway Board circulars
Annexure H of August 27 1979 is one such Annexure H The Railway Board have now revised their policy in regard to reservation and other concessions to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in posts filled by promotion
The particular concessions are concretised thus B Promotion by selection method i Class II appointments In promotion by selection from Class III to Class II as a measure of improving representation of Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes it has now been decided that if they are within the zone of eligibility the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe employees will be given by the SelectionDepartmental promotion Committee one grading higher than the grading otherwise assignable to them on the basis of their record of service ie if any Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe employee has been categorised by the Committee on the basis of his record of service as Good he should be recategorised by the Committee as Very Good
Likewise if any Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe employee is grades as Very Good on the basis of his record of service he will be recategorised by the Committee as Outstanding
Of course if any Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe employee has already been categorised by the Committee as Outstanding on the basis of his record of service no recategorisation will be needed in his case
This recategorisation will then 219 form the basis of allotment of marks in respect of Record of service 
The above concession would be confined to only 25 per cent of the total number of vacancies in a particular grade or post filled in a year
In the matter of selection to Class III and Class IV posts the concession runs thus There will be reservation of 12 per cent and 5 per cent of the vacancies for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes respectively in promotions made by selection in or to Class III and Class IV posts in grades or services in which the element of direct recruitment if any does not exceed 50 per cent
Promotion against reserved vacancies will continue to be subject to the candidates satisfying the prescribed minimum qualifications and standards of fitness
It has also been decided that in respect of promotions to selection posts in Class III where safety aspect is not involved the qualifying marks under Professional ability in respect of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates should be 25 out of 50 instead of 30 out of 50 as applicable to the candidates belonging to the unreserved groups
Similarly qualifying marks in aggregate in respect of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be 50 out of 100 instead of 60 out of 100 for others
It must be noticed that while grading has been modified and qualifying marks reduced as indicated above for SCST care has also been taken to exclude from these concessions posts which involve safety aspects and not to relax prescribed minima of qualifications and standards of fitness
Article 335 has been honoured making a margin on merit inevitable when choosing the second best
The next Order assailed by counsel is that of 20th April 1970 Annexure I and its highlights are revealed by relevant excerpts ANNEXURE I The policy of the Government of India in regard to reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in posts and services under the Government of India was laid down in the Ministry of Home Affairs Resolution No 422149NGS dated 13th September 1950 circulated with Railway Board s letter No E47CMI493 dated 23rd December 1950
The question of revising the percentages 220 of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in post and services under the Government of India in the light of the population of these communities as shown in the 1961 census has been under consideration of the Government for some time
It has now been decided in modification of the decisions contained in paras 2 and 41 of the Ministry of Home Affairs  Resolution dated 13th September 1950 that the following reservations will hereafter be made for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in posts and services which are filled by direct recruitment What are they 12 and 5 are raised to 15 and 7 respectively for SCs and STs consequent on the census picture and population ratio
Likewise in local or regional recruitments presumably they are inferior posts the population ratio prevalent in the concerned States was to be the basis for reservation quota for SCST
By the same order the carry forward rule was carried a little further forward by increasing it in the absence of suitable candidates from SCST from 2 to 3 years
It was also provided that the reserved vacancies if candidates were available and vice versa could well be filled by them instead of being thrown open to the general community
The Board s letter dated April 29 1970 made a further change by revising the roster
Positions Nos 1 4 8 14 17 22 28 36 were to go to SCST candidates
The Note takes care to avoid total deprivation of changes for a particular year for general candidates when the vacancies are few NOTE If there are only two vacancies to be filled in a particular year not more than one may be treated as reserved and if there be only one vacancy it should be treated as unreserved
If on this account a reserved point is treated as unreserved the reservation may be carried forward to the subsequent three recruitment years
Similar provisions though somewhat different in detail were made for posts filled by direct recruitment otherwise than by open competition
A big break with the past was next made by the Board s proceedings of 11 1 1973 Annexure K which hurt the lower classes of employees whose promotion was regulated by seniority cum suitability ie non selection posts according to official jargon
That directive states 221 ANNEXURE K After careful consideration the Board have now decided that a quota of 15 and 7 12 for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes respectively may also be provided in promotion to the categories and posts in Class I II III and IV filled on the basis of seniority cum suitability provided the element of direct recruitment to those grades if any does not exceed 50
The number of reserved vacancies in a recruitment year viz financial year on the Railways should be determined under Board s letter No ESCT 70CM1510 dated 20 4 70  
In the case of reserved community candidates equal to the number of reserved vacancies are not found suitable for promotion even with relaxed standard the reserved vacancies may be dereserved after following the procedure prescribed for dereservation as in the case of selection categories
The quota so dereserved will be carried forward to three subsequent recruitment years the year in which no panel is formed is not to be taken into account for this purpose
This order has been fiercely attached as unconstitutional
The order attached in Rangachari s case supra related to selection posts at the promotion level but Annexure K 11 1 1973 covers promotion to non selection posts
The whole gamut of promotions in Classes II III and IV areas thus comes under the reservation formula
Annexure I extended the principle of reservation to lower ranks of Class I services ie Junior Class I scale
The carry forward  project calculated to ensure adequate representation by broadening the time zone to three years was applicable to all cases of reservations in promotion posts
One of the major broadside attacks made on the validity of the Railway Board s circulars was the serious peril to administrative efficiency a non negotiable value under article 335
The hazards to railway travel it was urged would so increase because of the harijan component and its sub standard performance that rail road accidents would escalate and threaten human life We must by way of antidote to this caricature notice however that provisions for special training and coaching where the recruit was somewhat sub standard was specially insisted on and this at least partially overcame the 222 awesome  deficiency
No factual material to blame all the ills of the Indian Railways on the reservation policy was placed before us except a hunch in a Report to be referred to later
If harijans were excluded would railway accidents have a long holiday  Courts are not credulity in robes  A comprehensive programme of balancing administrative competency with adequacy of SCST representation was attempted by the Railway Board in Annexure M which provided for in service training for candidates who were below standard
This letter of the Board dated 31st August 1974 recalled the earlier letter of 27 4 1959 which provided While filling the posts on promotion however candidates of three communities should be judged in a sympathetic manner and arrangements made where necessary to give to such staff additional training and coaching to bring them upto the standard of others
In the light of actual experience and the complex of considerations implied in articles 164 46 and 335 the Board directed with disturbing concern for the continued exclusion of SCST candidates as follows The matter has been further considered by the Board and it has been decided that if during the selection proceedings it is found that the requisite number of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates are not available for being placed on the panel in spite of the various relaxations already granted the best among them ie who secure highest marks should be earmarked for being placed on the panel to the extent vacancies have been reserved in their favour
The panel excluding the names of such persons may also be declared provisionally
Thereafter the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates who have been so earmarked may be promoted ad hoc for a period of six months against the vacancies reserved for them
During the said six months period the Administration should give them all facilities for improving their knowledge and coming upto the requisite standard if necessary by organising special coaching classes
At the end of the six months period a special report should be obtained on the working of these candidates and the case put up by the Department concerned to the General Manager through SPORP for a review
The continuance of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates in the 223 higher grades would depend upon this review
If the candidates are found to have come upto the requisite standard their names would be included in the panel and the vacancies dereserved and filled in the usual manner by candidates from other communities
The procedure indicated in the preceding para would also apply to promotion to the posts filled on the basis of seniority cum suitability with the only difference that the Review at the end of the six months period would be carried out by the authority competent to approve the Select List
This directive takes good care of harijan girijan obtuseness if any
We move on to Annexure N of February 21 1976 which relates to carrying forward of reserved vacancies remaining unfilled
We need not go into its details except to state that further facilities are offered to SCST promotees on account of unsatisfactory intake as a fact
Although on paper what might appear to be pampering concessions were offered to SCST candidates the painful reality according to the Union of India was alarming under representation and utter inadequacy of SCST personnel in the Railway Services
Arithmetical manipulations and national concessions incorporated in government proceedings did not impact on the raw life of depressed classes unless activist tactics of upgrading the competence and awareness of those human sectors were fruitfully carried out in a result oriented manner
The Union of India and the Railway Board apparently pinned their faith on increasing the percentage hoping that thereby more harijans would be attracted
The twin reservations of 15 and 7 12 for the SCs and STs to be filled by promotion in Class I II III and IV services whereby seniority cum suitability or selection on the strength of competitive examinations had all along been limited in such manner as not to exceed 50 even on the application of the carry forward  formulae
Since this did not ensure fair representation a change was contemplated by Annexure O The question of enlarging the scope of the existing scheme of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the aforesaid cases has been under the consideration of the Government of India for some time past and in partial modification of the instructions contained in the above letters it has now been decided that henceforth the reservations in posts filled by promotion under the existing scheme as indicated above would be applicable to all grades or services where 224 the element of direct recruitment if any does not exceed 66 23 as against 50 per cent as at present
What was done was to raise the maximum from 50 to 66 23 its vice writ on its face according to counsel s argument being promotion of inefficiency along with promotion of SCST appointees
The furious charges of inefficiency in Administration injected by incompetence imported through SCST candidates and by frustration and demoralisation of the non SCST members who were passed over by their less competent juniors was sought to be supported by reliance on the Report of the Railway Accidents Enquiry Committee 1968
There was reference in it to discontent among supervisors inter alia on account of the procedure of reservation of posts for SCST
It is true that the Report has a slant against the SCST promotion policy notwithstanding the assurance given by the Railway Board to the Committee that instructions had been issued not to relax standards in favour of SCST members where safety was involved
We need hardly say that it is straining judicial gullibility to breaking point to go that far
This is an argumentum an absurdum though urged by petitioners with hopeful ingenuity
Nor are we concerned with certain newspaper items and representations about frustration and stagnation
On the other hand the plea forcefully put forward that economic backwardness should be the touchstone of any reservation policy in a secular socialist republic may merit better examination
Surely extraneous factors however passionately projected cannot shake or shape judicial conclusions which must be founded on constitutional criteria and relevant facts only
What then is the defence of the Union to the charge of departure from equal treatment for all citizens alike  What is the principle derivable from the precedents on the points raised  A technical point is taken in the counter affidavit that the 1st petitioner is an unrecognised association and that therefore the petitioner to that extent is not sustainable
It has to be overruled
Whether the petitioners belong to a recognised union or not the fact remains that a large body of persons with a common grievance exists and they have approached this Court under article 32
Our current processual jurisprudence is not of individualistic Anglo Indian mould
It is broad based and people oriented and envisions access to justice through class actions  public interest litigation  and representative proceedings 
Indeed little Indians in large numbers seeking remedies in courts through collective proceedings instead of being driven to an expensive plurality of litigations is an affirmation of participative justice in our democracy
We have no hesitation in holding that the narrow concept 225 of cause of action  and person aggrieved  and individual litigation is becoming obsolescent in some jurisdictions
It must fairly be stated that the learned Attorney General has taken no objection to a non recognised association maintaining the writ petitions
The case of the Union of India is that articles 46 335 161 and 164 must be taken as a constitutional package and not read in isolation
In that view the policy of reservation is geared to equalisation of opportunities for employment and therefore a fulfillment of article 161
Reading the two sub articles as complementary to each other and giving a wider connotation to the expression appointment the learned Attorney General sought to include in its semantic circle appointments by way of promotion deputation transfer and on contract
On this footing it was urged that article 164 completely protected the various directives regarding appointments by promotion
It is the case of the Government that SCST have all along suffered social and economic deprivation and utter under representation in the Government service
Naturally reservation to boost the chances of the SCST in Government services had to be resorted to as a pragmatic policy of levelling up
Having regard to administrative efficiency and other social factors Government had been reviewing the position from time to time and had tailored its reservation policy to fit the needs of a given service or state of affairs
The stand of the State is that  once the Government have decided after reviewing the overall position of representation of Scheduled CastesScheduled Tribes in Government Services that the reservation principles should continue in certain types of appointments the reservation of a certain number of vacancies have to be provided irrespective of whether Scheduled CastesScheduled Tribes are already duly represented or not in specific cadres of the Services
Although Rangachari s case covered only selection posts the Union of India took the view that the same principle held good for nonelection posts also
In fact if at all the prospects of SCSTs in Government Service were to be improved it had to begin with non selection posts
They are the lower categories where the members of the SCST have a chance
Provision of reservation in Class I services would be theoretically attractive to SCSTs but not so much in practice
 reservation in promotional appointments made by means of seniority cum suitability is necessary because the 226 Scheduled CastesScheduled Tribes who generally occupy the lower positions in the recruitmentpromotional panels cannot get further promotion at all or as per the requisite percentage alongwith other employees because of their very low position in the seniority list The submission of the Central Government is that not with standing the extension of the principle of reservation the presence of harijans and girijans is sparse
In this connection an extract from the half yearly report of the Ministry of Railways for the period ending 31 3 1978 showing the representation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the various Railway Services presented to the Parliament by the Government is reproduced below
The table furnished as in 1978 shows that Scheduled Castes have in Class I around 7 representation in Class II 95 in Class III 111 and even in Class IV excluding safaiwalas only 18
Safaiwalas who are menials like scavengers and sweepers are mostly drawn from harijans since other communities consider such jobs infra dig
So there is 83 representation of SCs among safaiwalas
This is not because of representation but because no one else is forthcoming for such untouchable  jobs
The Scheduled Tribes have a more pathetic tale to tell
In Class I services they have 1 representation in Class II 18 in Class III 22 and in Class IV excluding safaiwalas 51 and even among safaiwalas only 15
On the basis of these statistics the Railway Board s case is that adequacy of representation for SCSTs even according to their population forgetting centuries of total exclusion is a long way off
These official figures culled from the Reports of the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are for employment in Central Govt
not confirmed to the Railways and reveal how a square deal to SCs and STs may take centuries observing the current snail s pace in the intake
Social realists will read these pessimistic figure of the last ten years which prove the myth and negate the neurotic rhetoric about the SCST communities having cornered all the posts in the Central Government from Chaprasi to Secretary accelerating there by the impending calamity of administrative collapse due to the disproportionate presence of the inefficient  social components A mere formula of reservation is not the factum of recruitment
That is 227 morbid fancy
The truth is that more aggressive policies than paper reservations are the need if equality and excellence are the creed
Reservation is but one strategy and historically has established itself
More must be done by a complex of processes by which harijansgirijans will get boosted in capabilities  and mainstreamed to share in the Civil Service cake
The poor annual assimilation into the public employment sector of the weakest social segments makes a tragic mockery of the statistical jugglery of harijan monopoly
Any theory or formula is best tested by how it works not by how it is worded
Nikita Kruschev once remarked  a theory isolated from practice is dead and practice which is not illumined by  theory is blind
The theoretical attack on over representation flowing from the reservation rule must be tried out in practice as the figures for the last 10 years show and the justification for more facilities and higher percentage in public employment must be validated by the thesis of social justice
Assertions either way end in a blind alley
That is why we have been at pains to project the constitutional theory and resultant representation of SC and ST reservations under article 164
Percentage of reservations made in favour of Scheduled Castes SC and Scheduled Tribes ST
Class I Class II Class III Class IV As on SC ST SC ST SC ST SC ST 1 1 70 
236 040 384 037 927 147 1809 359 1 1 71 
258 041 406 043 989 170 1837 365 1 1 72 
299 050 413 044 977 172 1861 382 1 1 73 
314 050 452 049 1005 195 1837 392 1 1 74 
325 057 459 049 1033 213 1853 384 1 1 75 
343 062 498 059 1071 227 1864 399 1 1 76 
346 068 541 074 1131 251 1875 393 1 1 77 
416 077 677 077 1184 278 1907 435 1 1 78 
450 085 644 088 1222 286 1913 466 1 1 79 
475 094 737 103 1255 311 1932 519 The facts in the statement we have digested from the Reports of the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes 228 conclusively show the long distance to travel before the SCST members in the civil services can be said to have and a fair or at least a proportional deal
Classes II and III for the whole of the central services have a range of 384 to 737 and 927 to 1255 for Scheduled Castes and 037 to 103 and 147 to 311 for Scheduled Tribes while their eligibility is of the order of 15 and 7 12 respectively
What a grievous beeway after 33 long years may be the acid comment of the victim sector ie the harijans and the girijans
The Central Government has countered the submission of the petitioners presented persuasively by Shri Venogopal that reservation compounded by the carry forward rule has ended up almost in cent per cent reservation to SCSTs thus wholly excluding others from job opportunities
The counter affidavit states thus I do not admit that the Government is giving 100 reservation to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
I submit that normally only 15 and 7 12 of the vacancies by means of a roster mechanism are reserved for the Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes respectively
However in the following cases it may look as if 100 of the available vacancies are being given to the Scheduled CastesScheduled Tribes
Of course based on Rangachari supra the State contends that entry even at the promotional points is constitutionally permitted and protected
The grievance that junior harijans steal a march over other senior members of service is exceptional rather than general according to the Railway Board and in any case is inevitable where reservation is permissible
Furthermore the Ministry of Railways having regard to article 335 had taken special care to give training coaching and the like to prevent inefficiency and to promote competency of SCST members in service
The deponent on behalf of the Union of India has explained the position thus I submit that the Ministry of Railways in 1974 after reviewing the position of intake of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in groups of posts filled by promotion in Railway Services and on the basis of a recommendation made by the Parliamentary Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes introduced a scheme of training of the Scheduled CastesScheduled Tribes employees on the jobs of the posts to which they are to be promoted
According to this scheme if during selection proceedings it is found that the Scheduled Castes 229 Scheduled Tribes of requisite standards are not available for being placed on the panel the best among them numbering to the extent of reserved vacancies ie who secure the highest marks are provided with in service training
For this purpose such candidates are promoted an ad hoc basis for a period of six months to the grade of the post on the jobs of which they are to receive training
During the said six months  period the administration give them all facilities for improving their knowledge and coming upto the requisite standard if necessary by organising special coaching classes
At the end of six months  period a special report is obtained on the working of such candidate which is reviewed by the General Manager or other competent authority
If as a result of this review they are found to have come upto the requisite standard of fitness to hold the post on regular basis they are included in the panel and are promoted to the grade regularly
If however the said review reveals that such candidates even after receiving the training on the jobs to which they are to be promoted regularly have not come upto requisite standard of suitability such candidates are immediately reverted to the grade from which they were given ad hoc promotion for the purpose of training
A further plea is taken that temporary promotions on ad hoc basis are sometimes given to SCST members purely for short duration for the purpose of imparting them with in service training on the jobs of the post to which they aspire for promotion
This had to be treated as a training period rather than an unconstitutional promotion over the heads of seniors
In short the factual submission of massive infiltration of incompetent harijansgirijans into the Railway Service vertically all along the line is refuted by facts and figures
Secondly the legal contentions of the petitioners have also been contested by the Union of India given earlier
In this background we may formulate the following points round which arguments have ranged and then deal with some mini submissions and technical objections put forward before us
1 Does article 161 insist on absolute equality or permit realistic and rational classification of unequal classes and treatment of such classes differently  2 Do SCSTs stand in a different class from the rest of the Indian community 230 3 Are SCST castes within the scope of article 162  If so does article 164 save special provisions in their favour in matters promotion and allied matters  4 Do the directives under attack impair administrative efficiency to a degree that it is violative of article 335  5 Do the ten circulars reduce the fundamental right under article 161 to a husk or cipherise it altogether  We must state certain constitutional fundamentals and societal elementals before we make a dialectical study of the basic issues thrown up by these cases
Most of the submissions made by counsel for petitioners cannot survive Rangachari and Thomas supra and our task is simplified by abiding by the propositions laid down therein because these twin rulings bind us being of benches of five and seven judges
Even though we would we could not and even though we could we would not depart from the holdings in these twin land mark cases which set the gravestone on many of the contentions
What are the constitutional fundamentals bearing on egalite vis a vis backward classes especially the SCSTs  What are the social essentials afflicting the life style of the SCsSTs  What is economic backwardness as distinct from social injustice and how does the Constitution strike the path of remedial jurisprudence harmonising the demands of both categories A luminous preface to the constitutional values nullified by social realities is found in Dr Ambedkar s address to the Constituent Assembly earlier extracted which draws poignant attention to the life of contradictions between the explosive social and economic inequalities and the processes of political democracy
How long shall we continue to live this life of contradictions  How long shall we continue to deny equality in our social and economic life Was the interrogation before the framers of the Constitution and they wanted to enforce the principle of one man one value 
This perspective must inform the code of equality contained in articles 14 to 16
Equality being a dynamic concept with flexible import this Court has read into articles 14 to 16 the pragmatic doctrine of classification and equal treatment to all who fall within each class
But care must be taken to see that classification is not pushed to such an extreme point as to make the fundamental right to equality cave in and collapse
See observations in Triloki Nath Khosa and Ors
vs State of Jammu and Kashmir 231 Ray CJ in Kerala vs Thomas epitomised the position in a few passages Articles 14 15 and 16 from part of a string of constitutionally guaranteed rights
These rights supplement each other
Article 16 which ensures to all citizens equality of opportunity in matters relating to employment is an incident of guarantee of equality contained in Article 14
Article 161 gives effect to Article 14
Both Articles 14 and 161 permit reasonable classification having a nexus to be the object to be achieved
Discrimination is the essence of classification
Classification is therefore to be founded on substantial differences which distinguish persons grouped together from those left out of the groups and such differential attributes must bear a just and rational relation to the object sought to be achieved
There is no denial of equality of opportunity unless the person who complains of discrimination is equally situated with the person or persons who are alleged to have been favoured
Article 161 does not bar a reasonable classification of employees or reasonable tests for their selection
State of Mysore vs V P Narasinga Rao
This equality of opportunity need not be confused with absolute equality
Under Article 161 equality of opportunity of employment means equality as between members of the same class of employees and not equality between members of separate independent class
The rule of parity is the equal treatment of equals in equal circumstances
The rule of differentiation in enacting laws differentiating between different persons or things in different circumstances
The circumstances which govern one set of persons or objects may not necessarily be the same as governing another set of persons or objects so that the question of unequal treatment does not really arise between persons governed by different conditions and different sets of circumstances
A classification in order to be constitutional must rest upon distinctions that are substantial and not merely illusory
The test is whether it has a reasonable basis free from artificiality and arbitrariness embracing all and omitting none naturally falling into that category
232 The learned Chief Justice relied upon earlier decisions to substantiate this proposition
In Triloki Nath Khosa vs State of J  K1 this Court had held that the State may make rules guided by realities just as the legislature is free to recognise degrees of harm and it may confine its restrictions to those classes of cases where the need is deemed to be the clearest Thus we arrive at the constitutional truism that the State may classify based upon substantial differentia groups or classes and this process does not necessarily spell violation of articles 14 to 16 Therefore in the present case if the SCSTs stand on a substantially different footing they may be classified group wise and treated separately since there is a Great Divide between the SCSTs on the one hand and the rest of the Indian community on the other
This is no matter of speculation or investigation because the Constitution itself has recognised the direst socioeconomic backward status of these species of humanity
We may quote Ray CJ where he observed The Constitution makes a classification of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in numerous provisions and gives a mandate to the State to accord special or favoured treatment to them
Article 46 contains a Directive Principle of State Policy fundamental in the governance of the country enjoining the State to promote with special care educational and economic interests of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and to protect them from any special injustice and exploitation
Article 335 enjoins that the claims of the members the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to the services and posts in the Union and the States shall be taken into consideration
Article 338 provides for appointment by the President of a Special Officer for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to investigate all matters relating to the safeguards provided for them under the Constitution
Article 341 enables the President by public notification to specify castes races or tribes which shall be deemed to be Scheduled Castes in the States and the Union Territories
Article 342 contains provision for similar notification in respect of Scheduled Tribes
Article 36624 and 25 defines Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
The classification by the impugned rule and the order is with a view to securing adequate representa 233 tion to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the services of the State as otherwise they would stagnate in the lowest rung of the State services
Article 335 of the Constitution states that claims of members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration in the making of appointments to the services and posts in connection with affairs of the State consistent with the maintenance of efficiency of administration
I had made similar observations in the same case The Directive Principles of State Policy fundamental in the governance of the country enjoin on the State the promotion with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and in particular of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes and protect them from social injustice 
To neglect this obligation is to play truant with article 46
Undoubtedly economic interests of a group as also social justice to it are tied up with its place in the services under the State
Our history unlike that of some other countries has found a zealous pursuit of government jobs as a mark of share in State power and economic position
Moreover the biggest and expanding with considerable State undertaking employer is Government Central and State much so appointments in the public services matter increasingly in the prosperity of backward segments
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes have earned special mention in article 46 and other weaker section  in this context means not every backward class  but those dismally depressed categories comparable economically and educationally to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Proceeding on this footing the fundamental right of equality of opportunity has to be read as justifying the categorization of SCSTs separately for the purpose of adequate representation in the service under the State
The object is constitutionally sanctioned in terms as articles 164 and 46 specificate
The classification is just and reasonable
We may however have to test whether the means used to reach the end are reasonable and do not outrun the purposes of the classification
Thus the scope of the case is narrowed down
234 Of course apart from article 161 article 162 expressly forbids discrimination on the ground of caste and here the question arises as to whether the Scheduled Castes and Tribes are castes within the meaning of article 162
Even assuming that there is discrimination article 162 cannot be invoked unless it is predicated that the Scheduled Castes are castes 
Terminological similarities are an illusory guide and we cannot go by verbal verisimilitude
It is very doubtful whether the expression caste will apply to Scheduled Castes
At any rate Scheduled Tribes are identified by their tribal denomination
A tribe cannot be equated with a caste
As stated earlier there are sufficient indications in the Constitution to suggest that the Scheduled Castes are not mere castes
They may be something less or some thing more and the time badge is not the fact that the members belong to a caste but the circumstance that they belong to an indescribably backward human group
Ray CJ in Kerala vs Thomas supra made certain observations which have been extracted earlier to make out that Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are not a caste within the ordinary meaning of caste
Since a contrary view is possible and has been taken by some judges a verdict need not be rested on the view that SCs are not castes
Even assuming they are classification if permitted will validate the differential rules for promotion
Moreover article 164 is an exception to article 162 also
The constitutional enquiry is whether the harijangirijan fold is so sharply marked off from the rest of the Indian human family as to justify classification for considerate treatment in the field of public employment  Let us be sure of the social facts
Mark Twain cynically remarked once Get your facts first and them you can distort them as much as you please
 By that token let us scan the status of the SCSTs the result of reservations in habilitating them into State services and the depressment impact on efficiency by supersession of meritorious seniors
It is a fact of our social history and a blot on our cultural heritage that 135 million men and women described as SCSTs have been suffering as suppressed classes denied human dignity and languishing as de facto bonded labour
They still are in several places worse than the serf and the slave and their social standard is lower than the social standard of ordinary human beings Ambedkar
Tortured violated and even murdered the saga of the SCSTs is not only one of economic exploitation but of social ostracisation
Referring to the sorrows of the suppressed shudras what I 235 prefer to call the panchama proletariat Swami Vivekananda demanded shudra raj and refuted the incapabilities of the groaning untouchables Aye Brahmins if the Brahmin has more aptitude for learning on the ground of heredity than the Pariah spend no more money on the Brahmin s education but spend all on the Pariah
Give to the weak for there all the gift is needed
Our poor people these downtrodden masses of India therefore require to hear and to know what they really are
Aye let every man and woman and child with out respect of caste or birth weakness and strength hear and learn that behind the strong and the weak behind the high and the low behind everyone there is that Infinite Soul assuring that infinite possibility and the infinite capacity of all to become great and good
Let us proclaim to every soul Arise awake and stop not till the goal is reached  Arise awake To make democracy functional and the republic real the social and economic personality of these backwardmost sections had to be restored
From this angle the ancient injustice on the shudras among the shudras has to be liquidated by effective equalising measures
Power material power is the key to socioeconomic salvation and the State being the nidus of power the framers of the Constitution have made provision for representation of these weaker sections both in the legislature and the executive
More poignant is the fact that all the welfare programmes have been only on paper not in practical life
With all the pampering  complained of we find that these downtrodden millions remain at the bottom of the socioeconomic scale and totter in the administrative services surviving with difficulty and securing some promotion here or there amidst a hostile milieu
If the concessions reservations relaxations and other partisan provisions had actually brought into the Services a considerable percentage at least commensurate with their population maybe the grievance voiced may ring true
But as late as 1971 a former Minister B section Murthy in his book Depressed and Oppressed Forever in Agony has given a sombre picture of the actual plight of the harijans of India and the figures of employment in Government Services of Scheduled Castes and Tribes as on 1 1 1970 20 years after the Constitution furnished by him p 74 are tell tale
In Class I services percentage wise these castes which constitute 225 of India s population had 040 in Class II 040 in 236 Class III 147 and in Class IV 341
This was socioeconomic democracy in reverse gear and a callous picture of under representation in administration as if harijans and girijans were still untouchable and unapproachable vis a vis Services under the State
Once we realise with John Tyndall that It is as fatal as it cowardly to blink facts because they are not to our taste the wind is taken out of the sails of the case of the petitioners
For in truth and actual life whatever the Railway Board s orders may say the representation of the SCSTs remains substantially below the sanctioned level although fair representation at least in proportion to their population is what is demographically just ignoring for the moment the neutralisation of the iniquitions past
We must remember that article 14 speaks of equality before the law and article 16 vouchsafes equality of opportunity
The social dynamics of equality involve the strategy of equalisation in a society of stratification through casteification
One of us did observe  In a spacious sense equal opportunity  for members of a hierarchical society makes sense only if a strategy by which the under privileged have environmental facilities for developing their full human potential
This consummation is accomplished only when the utterly depressed groups can claim a fair share in public life and economic activity including employment under the State or when a classless and casteless society blossoms as a result of positive State action
To help the lagging social segments by special care is a step towards and not against a larger and stabler equality 
It is a statistically proved social reality in India that the depressed employment position of harijans is the master problem in the battle against generations of retardation and reservation  and other solutions have made no significant impact on their employment in public services
In such an unjust situation to maintain mechanical equality is to perpetuate actual inequality
A battery of several programmes to fight down this fell backwardness must be tried out by the State Subha Rao J in Devadasan s case brought out the need for equalisation to produce stable equality in society by a telling imagery
Although he was in a minority on one point in that case that did not detract from the validity or force of the general observations 237 Article 14 lays down the general rule of equality
Article 16 is an instance of the application of the general rule with special reference to opportunity of appointments under the State
It says that there shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State
If it stood alone all the backward communities would go to the wall in a society of uneven basic social structure the said rule of equality would remain only an utopian conception unless a practical content was given to it
Its strict enforcement brings about the very situation it seek to avoid
To make my point clear take the illustration of a horse race one is a first class race horse and the other an ordinary one
Both are made to run from the same starting point
Though theoretically they are given equal opportunity to run the race in practice the ordinary horse is not given an equal opportunity to compete with the race horse
Indeed that is denied to it
So a handicap may be given either in the nature of extra weight or a start from a longer distance
By doing so what would otherwise has been a force of a competition would be made a real one
The same difficulty had confronted the makers of the Constitution at the time it was made
Centuries of calculated oppression and habitual submission reduced a considerable section of our community to a life of serfdom
It would be well nigh impossible to raise their standards if the doctrine of equal opportunity was strictly enforced in their case
They would not have any chance if they were made to enter the open field of competition without Adventitious aids till such time when they could stand on their own legs
A strikingly similar strain of justice thinking has been developed in other jurisdictions in the field of equal protection and benign discrimination by Polyvos G Polyviou in his book The Equal Protection of the Laws
It may be meaningful to notice the argument   focuses on the concepts of equal treatment and equal opportunity professes to construe them realistically and declares that t he minority applicant does not have an opportunity equal to the white s because the discriminatory denial of educational professional and cultural opportunities for generations past has severely handicapped him in any contest of early intellectual attainment 
As Professor Cox has well put the question d we achieve 238 equality by putting each individual on the same starting line today or by giving minority applicants head starts designed to offset the probable consequences of past discrimination and injustice against the group with which the applicant is identified  The same author deals with reverse discrimination  in school admissions and refers to Prof Dworkin s socio jural defense of preferences Nor should it be forgotten in this connection that at least in terms of traditional theory rights to equal treatment and to freedom from discrimination as normally conceived are personal and individual and that equal protection is not achieved through the indiscriminate imposition of inequalities for the alleged benefit of groups however disadvantaged
Benevolent quotas and reverse discrimination on this view fatally offend fundamental notions of individualism inherent in the notion of equality
In answer it may be said that to regard the concept of equality simply from this traditionally individualistic point of view is to take an unduly restrictive view of its social function and to ignore its allegedly multifaceted character
Or to adopt a somewhat different strategy one may read the right to equal treatment both the more general right to equality and the right enshrined in the constitutional guarantee of equal protection in a particularly abstract way and formulate it in such a manner that it is not necessarily violated by the adoption of benign racial classifications
In this way Professor Dworkin distinguishes between two different sorts of rights  which individuals may be said to have
The first is the right to equal treatment which is the right to an equal distribution of some opportunity or resource and the second is the right to treatment as an equal which is the right not to receive the same distribution of some burden or benefit but to be treated with the same respect and concern as anyone else 
For Dworkin it is the right to treatment as an equal that is fundamental whilst the right to equal treatment is only derivable and it is the former that as a general matter is given constitutional standing  by the Equal Protection Clause
In other words white applicants for admission to Law School who may have been turned away because of the reservation of some places for members of disadvantaged minority groups cannot in a case like the one set out above successfully complain the reason being that they 239 do not have a right to equal treatment in the assignment of places but they do have the right to be treated as equals that is with equal respect concern and sympathy in the making of decisions as to which admissions standards should be used
More specifically this right is viewed by Dworkin as meaning that each candidate for admission has a right that his interests should be looked at as fully and sympathetically  as the interests of any others when decisions are being taken as to which of the many possible criteria for admission to elevate to the status of the pertinent ones
But if this condition is satisfied rejected white applicants will fail in their contention that the particular admissions program was unfair and unconstitutional even if they had been effectively excluded from consideration as a result of the adoption of racial criteria in determining the allocation of some of the available places
The simple question Dworkin would ask in these cases is whether the particular admissions program serves a proper policy that respects the right of all members of the community to be treated as equals but not otherwise
No debate is needed to uphold reservation in promotions as such
Not only has Rangachari sustained it in regard to selection posts Thomas s case decided by a Bench of seven Judges has expressly approved Rangachari
The only question bearing on reservation vis a vis promotion is as to whether it is unconstitutional if it is extended to non selection posts while it is constitutional in regard to selection posts
Anyway Annexure F one of the circulars sought to be quashed by the petitioners relates only to selection posts and has been expressly upheld in Rangachari s case
The quantum of reservation is not excessive the field of eligibility is not too unreasonable the operation of the reservation is limited to selection posts and no relaxation of qualifications is written into the circular except that candidates of the SCST communities should be judged in a sympathetic manner
Moreover administrative efficiency is secure because there is a direction to give such staff additional training and coaching to bring them up to the standard of others
The rejection of the invalidatory contention of the petitioners is inevitable
Annexure H is bad for unconstitutionality according to the petitioners for many reasons
For one thing an SCST employee gets one grading higher than otherwise assignable to him on the record of his service
So much so if he is good  he will be categorised as very 240 good 
This fiction or fraud in grading is said to be a vice rendering the promotional prospects unreasonable
We do not agree
Superficially viewed this clumsy process of reclassifying ability may strike one as disingenuous
Of course this concession is confined to only 25 of the total number of vacancies in a particular grade or post filled in a year
So there is no rampant vice of every harijan or girijan jumping over the heads of others
More importantly we think this is only an administrative device of showing a concession or furtherance of prospects of selection
Even as under article 154 and article 164 lesser marks are prescribed as sufficient for SCSTs or extra marks are added to give them an advantage the re grading is one more method of boosting the chances of selection of these depressed classes
There is nothing shady about it
If there is advancement of prospects of SCST by addition of marks or prescribing lesser minimum marks or by relaxing other qualifications I see no particular outrage in re categorisation which is but a different mode of conferring an advantage for the plain and understandable reason that SCSTs do need some extra help
It is important to note that the prescribed minimum qualifications and standards of fitness are continued even for SCSTs under Annexure H
The other vice pointed out against Annexure H is that the qualifying marks in respect of SCST candidates is somewhat less than is applicable to candidates of unreserved groups
There is no merit in this objection and no good ground exists which militates against the constitutionality of Annexure H Annexure I is also unexceptionable since all that it does is to readjust the proportion of reservation in conformity with the latest Census
Posts for which recruitment realistically speaking takes place on a regional basis are subjected to reservation taking into account the percentage of SCST population in the concerned State
This is also reasonable
Likewise the carry forward rule being raised from 2 years to 3 years also cannot be struck down
It must be realised that law is not an abstraction but an actual prescription in action
So what we have to be more careful about is to scrutinise whether the carry forward rule by being increased to 3 years is going to confer a monopoly upon the SCST candidates and deprive others of their opportunity for appointment
From the percentage furnished by the Railway Board we find that even if we carry forward vacancies for any number of years there is no prospect within the reasonable future of sufficient number of SC  ST candidates turning up to fill them
There is a provision that if sufficient number of candidates from the SC  ST are not found applicants from the unreserved communities will be given the appointment provisionally
After 3 years those vacancies cease to be reserved
Going by the actuals it is clear that no serious infraction of 241 any individual s fundamental right under article 161 takes place and no monopoly is conceivably conferred on SCST candidates they are not available in sufficient numbers to reach anywhere near the percentage reserved
Even going by the majority Devadasan s case    lays down the proposition that under article 164 reservation of a reasonable percentage B of posts for members of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes is within the competence of the State
What the percentage ought to be must necessarily depend upon the circumstances obtaining from time to time
 Madholkar J speaking for the majority has struck down only one restriction In order to effectuate the guarantee each year of recruitment will have to be by itself and the representation for backward communities should not be so excessive as to create a monopoly or to disturb unduly the legitimate claims of other communities
 emphasis added
Unlimited reservation of appointments may be impermissible because it renders article 161 nugatory
At the same time article 164 calculated to promote social justice and expressive of the deep concern of the Constitution for the limping bracket of Indians must be given full play
That is why the only restraint imposed by Mudholkar J is that an exercise of power under article 164 does not mean that the provision made by the State should have the effect of virtually obliterating the rest of the Article particularly clauses 1 and 2 thereof  By the three year carry forward  rule one is unable to see how in practice the total vacancies will be gobbled up by the harijangirijan groups virtually obliterating article 161
The court has made it very clear that the problem of giving adequate representation to backward classes under article 164 is a matter for the Government to consider bearing in mind the need for a reasonable balance between the rival claims as pointed out in Balaji s case2 It is true that in Balaji s case and Devadasans casel the carry forward  rule for backward classes for exceeded 50 and was struck down
We must remember that the percentage of reservation for backward classes including SCST was rather high in both the cases
In Devadasan s case the court went into the actuals not into the hypothetical
This is most important
The Court actually verified the degree of deprivation of the equal opportunity  right and discovered 3  In the case before us 45 vacancies have actually been filled out of which 29 have gone to members of the Scheduled 1  at 695
2 1963 Supp 1 SCR 439
3 Ibid at 693 94
242 Castes and Tribes on the basis of reservation permitted by the carry forward rule
This comes to about 644 of reservation
Such being the result of the operation of the carry for ward rule we must on the basis of the decision in Balaji s case hold that the rule is bad
emphasis added What is striking is that the Court did not take an academic view or make a notional evaluation but checked up to satisfy itself about the seriousness of the infraction of the right
On that footing the petitioners have not demonstrated that in any particular year virtually and in actual terms of promotion there has been a substantial excess over 50 in favour of the SCST promotees
Mathematical calculations departing from realities of the case may startle us without justification the apprehension being misplaced
All that we need say is that the Railway Board shall take care to issue instructions to see that in no year shall SCST candidates be actually appointed to substantially more than 50 of the promotional posts
Some excess will not affect as mathematical precision is different in human affairs but substantial excess will void the selection
Subject to this rider or condition that the carry forward  rule shall not result in any given year in the selection or appointments of SCST candidates considerably in excess of 50 we uphold Annexure I Heated arguments about the hurt caused by Annexure J  have been addressed to us
It deals with the 40 point roster and the posts allotted to the SCST allottees
Once the fundamental premises are accepted there is nothing unreasonable or wrong in Annexures 1 and 2 to Annexure J
It is significant that with a view to prevent total exclusion of others there is a provision that if there are only two vacancies in a given year in more than one may be treated as reserved and if there is only one vacancy it should be treated as unreserved
Implementation of reservations necessarily involves practical steps like evolving a roster system
Once the parameters of reservation are within the framework of the fundamental rights minute scrutiny of every administrative measure and hunting for unconstitutionality is not permissible
Far more serious is the criticism of Annexure K  on the basis of which reservations were introduced even to promotion posts filled by the seniority cum suitability  rule
Some other relaxations and con cessions also are granted under it to SCST candidates
But the maximum mayhem inflicted by Annexure K is in the extension of the operation of promotional reservation to non selection posts
It was urged that Rangachari supra did not cover non selection posts and there 243 fore could not be an authority to sustain its validity
There is no force in this submission
The sting of the argument against reservation is that it promotes inefficiency in administration by choosing sub standards candidates in preference to those with better mettle
Competitive skill is more relevant in higher posts especially those where selection is made by competitive examinations
Lesser classes of posts where promotion is secured mechanically by virtue of seniority except where the candidate is unfit do not require a high degree of skill as in the case of selection posts
See 1968 1 SCR p 721 at 734
It is obvious that as between selection and non selection posts the role of merit is functionally more  relevant in the former than in the latter
And if in Rangachari reservation has been held valid in the case of selection posts such reservation in non selection posts is an afortiori case
If in selecting top officers you may reserve posts for SCST with lesser merit how can you rationally argue that for the posts of peons or lower division clerks reservation will spell calamity  The part that efficiency plays is far more in the case of higher posts than in the appointments to the lower posts
On this approach Annexure K is beyond reproach
One may easily sympathise with holders of non selection posts
They are many in number in the lower stations of life
They are economically backward and burdened with the drudgery of life
That is why there is a ballyhoo raised by a larger number of people when some categories in far more distressing social situations enter the arena with preferential treatment
Looking at the problem from the point of view of law and logic and the constitutional justification under article 164 for reservation in favour of the panchama proletariat there is nothing to strike down in Annexure K
As between the socially even economically depressed and the economically backward the Constitution has emphatically cast its preference for the former
Who are we as Judges to question the wisdom of provisions made by Government within the parameters of article 164 The answer is obvious that the writ of the court cannot quash what is not contrary to the Constitution however tearful the consequences for those who may be adversely affected
The progressive trend must of course be to classify on the have not basis but the SCST category is generally speaking not only deplorably poor but also humiliatingly pariah in their lot
Maybe some of the forward lines of the backward classes have the best of both the words and their electoral muscle qua caste scares away even radical parties from talking secularism to them
We are not concerned with that II dubious brand
In the long run the recipe for backwardness is not creating a vested interest in backward castes but liquidation of handi 244 caps social economic by constructive projects
All this is in another street and we need not walk that way now
Trite arguments about efficiency and inefficiency are a trifle phoney because after all at the higher levels the harijangirijan appointees are a microscopic percentage and even in the case of Classes III and II posts they are negligible
The preponderant majority coming from the well reserved communities are presumably efficient and the dilution of efficiency caused by the minimal induction of a small percentage of reserved  candidates cannot affect the over all administrative efficiency significantly
Indeed it will be gross exaggeration to visualise a collapse of the Administration because 5 to 10 of the total number of officials in the various classes happen to be sub standard
Moreover care has been taken to give in service training and coaching to correct the deficiency
It is fashionable to say and there is perhaps some truth in it that from generation to generation there is a deterioration in efficiency in all walks of life from politics to pedagogy to officialdom and other professions
Nevertheless the world has been going forward and only parties whose personal interest is affected forecast a doom on account of progressive deficiency in efficiency
We are not impressed with the misfortune predicted about governmental personnel being manned by morons merely because a sprinkling of harijansgirijans happen to find their way into the Services
Their apathy and backwardness are such that in spite of these favourable provisions the unfortunates have neither the awareness nor qualified members to take their rightful place in the Administration of the country
The malady of modern India lies elsewhere and the merit mongers are greater risks in many respects than the naive tribals and the slightly better off low castes
Nor does the specious plea that because a few harijans are better off therefore the bulk at the bottom deserves no jack up provisions merit scrutiny
A swallow does not make a summer
Maybe the State may when social conditions warrant justifiably restrict harijan benefits to the harijans among the harijans and forbid the higher harijans from robbing the lowlier brethren We have adverted to Annexure M earlier in this judgment which shows the determination of Government to impart in service training to those SCST candidates who are found to be below par
Even temporary promotions on an ad hoc basis are limited to six months only to give training and experience than the spoil permanently the efficiency of the system
The Annexure has come under attack because the reservation quota has been raised thereby from 50 to 66 23
We have earlier dis 245 cussed this aspect and pointed out that what is important is not so much the figures mentioned on paper but the facts and circumstances in real life
We have also entered a caveat that in any particular year there shall not as a fact be a substantial increase upon 50 of induction of reserved  candidates
It is true that Shri Venugopal counsel for some of the petitioners tried to demonstrate that on account of reservation percentages coupled with the carry forward rule it is perfectly within the realm of possibility that in some years a monopoly may be conferred on the SCST candidates for certain categories or classes of posts
The mystic maybe do not scare us
The actual must be will alert us
The Constitution deals with social realities not speculative possibilities
I have limited the physical operation of reservation in any particular year in such a manner that there will be a real opportunity for the exercise of the right under article 161 for every candidate of the unreserved communities
Certain minor attacks such as that a candidate of the SCST communities who has failed may still be tried if other successful candidates from those communities are not forthcoming
This may seem strange disbelief in examinations as measure of merit
But to read stray provisions in isolation may be unfair to the scheme
Look at the desperate State in which Government is trying to give fair representation to harijansgirijans in Administration
These miserables suppressed by centuries of trampling are still slumbering despite inducements to awaken
It is a genetic calumny and unscientific assertion to castigate the SCST communities as possessed of less intellectual potential what with Valmiki and Vyasa to Baba Sahib Ambedkar
The darkening and be numbing environment of ages in which shudras and panchamas have suffered their mental powers to be chained accounts for their seeming retardation
Once brighter atmosphere and better opportunity enliven their talent their contribution to the Indian treasury will raise the human resources and democratic status of Bharat
A democracy of talent is an inarticulate major premise of our culture
The fundamental question arises as to what is merit and suitability
Elitists whose sympathies with the masses have dried up are from the standards of the Indian people least suitable to run Government and least meritorious to handle state business if we envision a Service State in which the millions are the consumers
A sensitized heart and a vibrant head tuned to the tears of the people will speedily quicken the developmental needs of the country including its rural stretches and slum squalour
Sincere dedication and intellectual integrity these are some of the major components of merit and suitability not degrees from Oxford or Cambridge Harvard or Stanford or simian though Indian 246 institutions
Unfortunately the very orientation of our selection process is distorted and those like the candidates from the SCST who from their birth have had a traumatic understanding of the conditions of agrestic India have in one sense more capability than those who have lived under affluent circumstances and are calIous to the human lot of the sorrowing masses
Moreover our examination system makes memory the master of merit  and banishes creativity into exile
We need not enter these areas where a fundamental transformation and a radical re orientation even in the assessment of the qualities needed by the personnel in the Administration and the socialist values to be possessed by the echelons in office is a consummation devoutly to be wished
This may have to be subjected to a national debate
The colonial hangover still clings to our selection processes with superstitious tenacity and narrower concepts of efficiency and merit are readily evolved to push out Gandhis and JPs Ambedkars and Nehrus to mention but a few who knew the heart beats of the people
I diva gate and make these observations only to debunk the exaggerated argument about harijans and girijans being sub standard
We may put aside this angle of vision and approach the problem traditionally because every new idea has resistance to encounter before acceptance every original thought has been branded a hearsay
Be that as it may the constitutional merits of the various Board Circulars now discussed do not warrant their judicial execution  subject to certain cautionary limitations already indicated
The argument that there are rich and influential harijans who rob all the privileges leaving the serf level sufferers as suppressed as ever
The Administration may well innovate and classify to weed out the creamy layer of SCST but the court cannot force the State in that behalf
For a comparative thought we may glance at Polyviou s The Equal protection of the laws    A third argument traditionally employed against the use of preferential discrimination is that affirmative measures of the kind discussed here may significantly curtail efficiency
It does indeed stand to reason that the immediate result of benignity in admission and selection process will almost certainly be the selection of those who are not as competent or as able as some of those left out Special admission programmes almost by definition operate to in sure that students are placed in schools for which they are 1 The equal protection of the laws by G Polyviou p 360
247 not qualified  The same objection applies with equal if not more force to the area of employment and elsewhere
One possible answer is that the importance of efficiency must be compared with and ultimately set against the significance of integration or the prevention of discrimination and that integration and the rectification of socially harmful deprivation are the more pressing needs
Or one can fall back on the very different arguments that traditional admission processes are unfair because these are geared to the usual type of applicant and that preferential treatment after all only seeks to counteract such inherent bias
There is a human problem behind these writ petitions which we clearly appreciate
Most of the Classes II III and IV employees are economically backward and struggle for survival what with price spirals and other tribulations
They hope after years of yeomen service to get some promotion and augment their poor resources in the afternoon of their life
Then they find another class with which the Constitution shows ultra sympathy elbowing them out not on a massive scale but minimally
Even this marginal push hurts these species living at subsistence level and so they scream
The economically backward and the socio economically backward truly belong to the have not  camp and must jointly act to bring about a transformation of the economic order by putting sufficient pressure and make article 38 a living reality
Estrangement between the two categories weakens the militancy of a joint operation to inject social justice in the current economic order
The truth is that the employment market is distressingly a musical chair business and when starvation faces men their sympathy for their far weaker brethren vanishes
The true solution for the country s problems as reflected in these writ petitions is in developmental expansion involving the millions rather than denial to the weakest sector of Indian life the morsel to which it is justly entitled
Even Administration will do well to remember that Indian despair after infinite patience may augur danger unless the sorry scheme of things entire  is remoulded nearer to article 38
Even these observations are made only to emphasise that the legal content of the contentions put forward by the petitioners is less than presentable although their economic grievance may be agonisingly genuine
The Court has its limitations unlike the Administration and can give justice only under the Constitution and not over it
The human pressure behind these writ petitions is the chronic drought of employment opportunities despite talent enough to make 248 deserts bloom
So long as this scarcity persists and power goes with office the jaundiced politics of snatching the jobs going initially or at promotion level by hook or crook is the only development  that takes place whatever the National Plans proclaim
The vast human potential of the harijans and girijans on fifth of the Indian people goes to thistles and every communal effort to twist the politics of power for promoting chances of getting jobs becomes inevitable caste being a deeprooted pathology in our country
Thus jobbery politics casteism and elections make an unholy though invisible alliance against national development which alone can liberate Indians from social and economic privation
If democracy itself thus plays into the hands of hostile forces the jurisprudence of keeping the backward as backward and perpetuation of discrimination as a vested caste right may prevail as a rule of life
The remedy of reservations  to correct inherited imbalances must not be an overkill
Backward classes outside the Scheduled Castes and Tribes cannot bypass article 162 save where very substantial cultural and economic disparity stares at society
The dubious obsession with backwardness  and the politicking with castes labelled backward classes may on an appropriate occasion demand judicial examination
The politics of power cannot sabotage the principles of one man one value
No sociological explanation for the flood of ruinous writ petitions regarding service conditions can be found except on this basis
Behind the writ petitions we deal with now is caste clamour to keep all the jobs safe from being robbed  by reserved  communities
It is forward caste versus backward caste wearing the casteless caste marks And the political process is likewise caste polluted Gunnar Myrdal writes in his Asian Drama    The type of appeal that can be made by politicians has also changed greatly since the liberation movement
They can no longer put the blame for poverty and stagnation on colonial masters but must explain why there is not great progress now that India is independent Thus a key to the understanding of the power of the political bosses is the inherited social stratification of India and above all its caste system
At election times the caste groups function as political vote banks whereby the ballots of their members are joined to the candidate with a party label
For this reason alone the local political bosses have a vested interest in preserving the social and economic status quo and exploiting it as a matrix for political action
1 Gunnar Myrdal Asian Drama Vol
I pp 249 M N Srinivas the noted sociologist is more than right 1 A One cannot help wondering whether the drive to political maturity is after all a good thing in a country which has still not had a proper social revolution
It may well result in premature old age
We need now not stagnation wearing the mask of stability and scrambling acrimoniously over the same shrunken cake but progress by the constructive process of explosive rural development and exploitation of the untapped human potential of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Sterile reservations  will not help us go ahead unless alongside of it we have heroic national involvement of the masses in actual action not paper logged plan exercises
In the last analysis privation can be banished only by production discontent by distributive justice and litigation by socially relevant Justice
The writ petitions are regrettably negative although the driving force of penury deserves sympathy
This perhaps is a materialist interpretation of service litigation  and a trim foot note to these writ petitions
D Before I conclude I must strike a futuristic note
Excellence and equality may cooperating fruitfully and need not compete destructively
Ultimately harijangirijan militancy must find fulfillment in effective main streaming and creative contribution
While they have miles to go they have promises to keep
The poignant words of the Reverend Jesse Jackson come to my mind 1 I don t see how we can survive as a people if we don t have a great push for excellence now
A lot of what we ve done in the past will be in vain if we don t
We can make one of the most valid contributions to Western civilization even more of a contribution than slavery
Because slavery was our great contribution against our will
Now it s time for us to make a great contribution as an act of will
 Given the opportunity and the environment the Indian dalits can make India great and give up crutches
The writ petitions as well as the Special Leave Petitions cannot but be dismissed
PATHAK J
My brothers Krishna Iyer and Chinnappa Reddy are agreed that the writ petitions should be dismissed
They have held against the petitioners on the several contentions raised in the 1 M N Srinivas Changing Attitudes in India Today Yogana October I 1961 p 26
250 case
With respect I find myself unable to agree with all that they have said
I intend to confine myself here to certain aspects of the case which appear to possess a fundamental importance
Three provisions of the Constitution relate to reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
They are article 46 article 164 and article 335
The three form a single frame of reference
article 46 a Directive Principle of State Policy proclaims the principle that the State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and in particular of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation
One of the modes in which the economic interests of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes can be promoted is the reservation of appointments or posts in their favour in services under the State where they are not adequately represented
article 164 declares that when the State intends to make such provision nothing in article 16 shall prevent it from doing so
The equality of opportunity guaranteed to all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State will not restrain the State from making such reservation
It is now well accepted that the equality provisions of Part III of the Constitution constitute a single code illustrating the multi faceted character of the central concept of equality
article 164 also is one facet
It enables a backward class of citizens by the process of reservation in Government service to move along the road to ultimate equality with the more advanced classes
It is part of the process of equalization
Then follows article 335
It provides that the claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration in the making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or a State but and this is imperative such consideration must be consistent with the maintenance of efficiency of administration
The paramount need is to maintain the efficiency of administration
That is dictated by the common good
It embraces the need of all the national good and not of a mere section of the people
To its primacy all else is subordinate
Therefore whatever is done in considering the claims of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes must be consistent with that supreme need the maintenance of efficiency of administration
article 335 it must be clearly stated does not contain a positive principle the advancement of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and a negative principle the maintenance of efficiency of administration
This analysis of the article does not 251 truly comprehend its contents
It contains a single principle the A advancement of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes but through modes and avenues which must not detract from the maintenance of an efficient administration
That limitation is imposed as a clear and positive condition
A generally acknowledged and long established principle for securing an efficient administration is throwing open the doors to general recruitment either directly or by promotion where the governing criterion is excellence and the emphasis is solely on quality
I he net of selection is spread far and wide and the competitive best are collected regardless of religion race caste sex descent place of birth or residence
However a quota of the posts may be reserved in favour of a backward class of citizens but the interests of an efficient administration require that at least half the total number of posts be kept open to attract the best of the nations talent and not more than half be made the sum of reserved quotas
If it was otherwise an excess of reserved quotaas would convert the State service into a collective membership predominantly of backward classes
This it is evident will be inconsistent with the all important goal of maintaining the efficiency of administration
In considering the proportion of reserved quotas in the context of college admissions this  court laid down in M R Balaji vs State of Mysore  that broadly a special provision providing for reservation should be less than 50 and how much less than 50 would depend upon the relevant prevailing circumstances in each case
And in this connection Gajendragadkar J as he then was speaking for the Court observed   when the State makes a special provision for the advancement of the weaker sections of society specified in article 154 it has to approach its task objectively and in a rational manner
Undoubtedly it has to take reasonable and even generous steps to help the advancement of weaker elements the extent of the problem must be weighed the requirements of the community at large must be borne in mind and a formula must be evolved which would strike a reasonable balance between the several relevant considerations Emphasis supplied The Court struck down the reservation of 68 as constitutionally Invalid
1 1963 Supp 1 SCR 439
252 The principle that reserved quotas should not together exceed 50 of the vacancies available in a year was affirmed by this Court by a majority of four learned judges to one in T Devadasan vs Union of India  as the reason for striking down a carry forward rule which for promotions in the Central Secretariat Service permitted a carry forward for two successive years of the annual reserved quota
It was found in that case that observance of the rule had resulted in 65 of the vacancies of the year being filled by reserved quotas current and carried forward
The carry forward rule was held constitutionally invalid on the basis that for the purpose of article 161 each year of recruitment had to be considered as a distinct unit for applying the 50 rule
Mudholkar J on behalf of the majority said We would like to emphasize that the guarantee contained in article 161 is for ensuring equality of opportunity for all citizens relating to employment and to appointments to any office under the State
This means that on every occasion for recruitment the State should see that all citizens are treated equally
The guarantee is to each individual citizen and therefore every citizen who is seeking employment or appointment to an office under the State is entitled to be afforded an opportunity for seeking such employment or appointment whenever it is intended to be filled
In order to effectuate the guarantee each year of recruitment will have to be considered by itself and the reservation for backward communities should not be so excessive as to create a monopoly or to disturb unduly the legitimate claims of other communities
 It seems to me that apart from the impact that an excessive reservation in a particular year is bound to have on the general community of citizens there is the further far reaching significance this assumes in the context of article 335
The maintenance of efficiency of administration is bound to be adversely affected if general candidates of high merit are correspondingly excluded from recruitment because the large bulk of the vacancies numbering anything over 50 is allotted to the reserved quota
In view of a maximum age limit invariably prescribed some of such meritorious candidates may be loss to the service altogether
Viewed in that light a maximum of 50 for reserved quotas in their totality is a rule which appears fair and reasonable just and equitable and violation of which would contravene Art 335
1  253 It has been urged by the respondents that Devadasn supra is A no longer good law in view of the 7 Judge decision in State of Kerala v N M Thomas 
It does appear from some of the individual Judgments delivered in the latter case that although Devadas supra has not been expressly overruled by a majority of the Bench there are observations by the majority of Judges which throw doubt on the validity of the principle enunciated by it and ultimately the Court has upheld the promotion of 34 Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates among the total promotion of 51 candidates
It would seem then that there is an apparent conflict between Devadas supra and N M Thomas supra
The validity of Rule 13AA of the Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules 1958 was questioned in N M Thomas supra
That Rule permitted the exemption of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe members from passing the promotion tests for a specified period
That more than 50 of the promotions went to the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates was a consequence of the operation of Rule 13AA
It is doubtful whether the petitioners  challenge to the carry forward rule can avoid what has been said in N M Thomas supra and therefore a conclusion in their favour does not seem possible in this case
As the position is not clear and in any event as my learned brothers have taken a definite view in favour of the carry forward rule I have confined myself to expressing these observations
The petitioners have challenged other provisions prescribed in favour of members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and have attempted to support their submissions by reference to data purporting to prove that those measures have resulted in reverse discrimination and are also inconsistent with the maintenance of efficiency of administration
We have been taken through charts and statistics among other documentary material but the material placed before us does not clearly and definitely establish what it seeks to prove
In the circumstances it is not possible to record a finding in favour of the petitioners on those points
G Accordingly the writ petitions are dismissed but without any order as to costs
CHINNAPPA REDDY J
In the name of Equality of opportunity we are asked to deny Equality of opportunity in these Writ Petitions
That we cannot do and that we will not do
If we do that we will be subverting the spirit and the sense of the Constitution
The 1  254 petitioners claim that their Fundamental Right to Equality of Opportunity in the matter of public employment guaranteed by article 161 of the Constitution has been flouted by a series of orders and circulars issued by the Railway Board reserving posts at several levels and making various concessions in favour of members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
This has been done it is claimed at the cost of efficiency though forbidden by article 335 of the Constitution
The plain answer of the respondents is that everyone of the orders and circulars has the backing of article 161 164 and other special provisions of the Constitution and that the alarm of inefficiency is nothing but a bogey
My brother Krishna Iyer J has considered the questions raised in his own characteristic scintillating way and in some depth
Though respect for my brother would ordinarily prevent me from venturing to write a separate opinion specially when I agree whole heatedly with his conclusions and the route traversed by him I propose to make in this case certain general observations because I expect the same questions to be raised repeatedly in different situations and in different forms and it is just as well that I project my own prosaic and pedestrian point of view without going into the detail or depth already explored by my brother
The class of people known compendiously as the Scheduled Castes  recognized and described as such in the Constitution of India have been treated as casteless  outcastes and untouchables and have been oppressed and subjected to every manner of depravation and discrimination for centuries upon centuries by a unique system of social and economic segregation a system of graded inequality Dr BR Ambedkar of gradation and degradation Dr CR Reddy and of gigantic cold blooded repression  Rabindranath Tagore
And for centuries they were even prevented from protesting their plight
Nor was any attempt made by the superior and elitist classes to know anything about them
All that a Scheduled Caste parent could do was to lament Hush my child don t cry my treasure Weeping is in vain For the enemy will never Understand our pain
For the ocean has its limits Prisons have their walls around But our suffering and our torment have no limit and no bound
 Then in 1950 came the Constitution rousing expectations raising hopes making promises and generally heralding a new a bitter and 255 a more decent life for the underprivileged and the oppressed people of India
While the preamble to the Constitution proclaims the resolution of the people to constitute India into a Sovereign also Socialist Secular  Since the 42nd Amendment Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens Justice Social economic and political and Equality of Status and opportunity and to promote Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual while the Right to Equality before the Law article 14 and Equality of Opportunity n the matter of public employment article 16 are guaranteed as Fundamental Rights and while the State is enjoyed by the Directive Principles of State Policy to promote the welfare of the p people by securing a social order in which justice social economic and political shall inform all the institutions of the national life article 381 to endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status facilities and opportunities article 38 2 and to direct its policy towards securing that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good article 39b and that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment article 39c pursuant to the very preamble and the provisions of the Constitution special provisions have been made
in particular for the protection and advancement of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in recognition of their existing low social and economic status and the consequent inability and failure on their part to avail themselves of any opportunity for self advancement
It is recognized that the failure of the State to create a climatic situation and provide the necessary impetus for the increasing participation of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the public services would tentamount to a denial to them of equal opportunity in the matter of public employment
article 335 which is included in part XVI of the Constitution dealing with special provisions relating to certain classes  expressly provides The claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration in the making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs to the Union or of a State
 article 46 one of the Directive Principles of State Policy enjoins The State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interest of the weaker sections of the 256 people and in particular of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes and shall protect them from social in justice and all forms of exploitation
 i article 16 1 and 16 4 which guarantee equality of opportunity in matters of public employment read as follows 16 1 There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State 16 4 Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which in the opinion of the State is not adequately represent in the services under the State  article 16 2 which bars discrimination on certain rounds is as follows 16 2 No citizen shall on grounds only of religion race caste sex descent place of birth residence or any of them be ineligible for or discriminated against in respect of any employment or office under the State
 Now it has been said very rightly a Constitutional instrument is sui generis and obviously and necessarily its interpretation cannot always run on the same lines as the interpretation of statutes made in exercise of the powers conferred by it
A constitution like ours born of an anti imperialist struggle influenced by Constitutional instruments events and r evolutions elsewhere in search of a better world and wedded to the idea of justice economic social and political to all must receive a generous interpretation so as to give all its citizens the full measure of justice so proclaimed instead of the austerity of tabulated legalism 1
And so when the Constitutional instrument to be expounded is a constitution like the Indian Constitution the expositors are to concern themselves not with words and mere words only but as much with the philosophy or what we may call the spirit and the sense  of the Constitution
Here we do not have to venture upon a voyage of discovery to find the spirit and the sense of the Constitution we do not have to look to any extraneous sources for inspiration and guidance they may be sought and found in the Preamble to the Constitution in the Directive Principles of State Policy and other such provisions
See Minister of Home Affairs   257 Because Fundamental Rights are justiciable and Directive Principles are not it was assumed in the beginning that Fundamental Rights held a superior position under the Constitution than the Directive Principles and that the latter were only of secondary importance as compared with the Fundamental Rights
That way of thinking is of the past and has become obsolete
It is now universally recognised that the difference between the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles lies in this that Fundamental Rights are primarily aimed at assuring political freedom to the citizens by protecting them against excessive State action while the Directive Principles are aimed at securing social and economic freedoms by appropriate State action
The Fundamental Rights are intended to foster the ideal of a political democracy and to prevent the establishment of authoritarian rule but they arc of no value unless they can be enforced by resort to Courts
So they are made justiciable
But it is also evident that notwithstanding their great importance the Directive Principles cannot in the very nature of things be enforced in a Court of law
It is unimaginable that any Court can compel a legislature to make a law If the Court can compel Parliament to make laws then Parliamentary democracy would soon be reduced to an oligarchy of Judges
It is in that sense that the Constitution says that the Directive Principles shall not be enforceable by Courts
It does not mean that Directive Principles are less important than Fundamental Rights or that they are not binding on the various organs of the State
article 37 of the Constitution emphatically states that Directive Principles are nevertheless Fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws
It follows that it becomes the duty of the Court to apply the Directive Principles in interpreting the Constitution and the laws
The Directive Principles should serve the Courts as a code of interpretation
Fundamental Rights should thus be interpreted in the light of the Directive Principles and the later should whenever and wherever possible be read into the former
Every law attacked on the ground of infringement of a Fundamental Right should among other considerations be examined to find out if the law does not advance one or other of the Directive Principles or if it is not in discharge of some of the undoubted obligations of the State constitutional or otherwise towards its citizens or sections of its citizens flowing out of the preamble
the Directive Principles and other provisions of the Constitution
So we have it that the Constitutional goal is the establishment of a Socialist Democracy which Justice economic social and political 258 is secure and all men are equal and have equal opportunity
Inequality whether of status facility or opportunity is to end privilege is to cease and exploitation is to go
The under privileged the deprived and the exploited are to be protected and nourished so as to take their place in an egalitarian society
State action is to be towards those ends
It is in this context that article 16 has to be interpreted when State action is questioned as contravening article 16
Let us now take a look at article 161 and Art 164
article 161 guarantees equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State
To the class of citizens who are economically and socially backward this guarantee will be no more than mere wishful thinking and mere vanity wind and confusion if it is not translated into reality by necessary state action to protect and nurture such class of citizens so as to enable them to shake off the heart crushing burden of thousand years  deprivation from their shoulders and to claim a fair proportion of participation in the Administration
Reservation of posts and all other measures designed to promote the participation of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Public Services at all levels are in our opinion necessary consequences flowing fro the Fundamental Right guaranteed by article 161S This very idea is emphasised further by article 164
article 164 is not in the nature of an exception to article 161
It is a facet of article 161 which fosters and furthers the idea of equality of opportunity with special reference to an under privileged and deprived class of citizens to when egalite de droit formal or legal equality is not egalite de fait practical or factual equality
It is illustrative of what the State must do to wipe out the distinction between egalite de droit and egalite de fait
It recognises that the right to equality of opportunity includes the right of the underprivileged to conditions comparable to or compensatory of those enjoyed by the privileged
Equality of opportunity must be such as to yield Equality of Results  and not that which simply enables people socially and economically better placed to win against the less fortunate even when the competition is itself otherwise equitable
John Rawls in A Theory of Justice  demands the priority of equality in a distributive sense and the setting up of the Social System so that no one gains or loses from his arbitrary place in the distribution of natural assets or his own initial position in society without giving or receiving compensatory advantages in return
His basic principle of social justice is All social primary goods liberty and opportunity income and wealth and the bases of self respect are to be distributed equally unless an unequal distribution of any or all these goods is to the advantage of the least 259 favoured
One of the essential elements of his conception of social A justice is what he calls the principle of redress This is the principle that undeserved inequalities call for redress and since inequalities of birth and natural endowment are undeserved these inequalities are somehow to be compensated for
Society must therefore treat more favourably those with fewer native assets and those born into less favourable social positions
If the statement that Equality of opportunity must yield Equality of Results  and if the fulfillment of Articles 161 in article 164 ever needed a philosophical foundation it is furnished by Rawls  Theory of Justice and the Redress Principle
The interpretation of articles 161 and 164 came up for consideration in several cases before this Court
Perhaps the most important of them is State of Kerala  Anv
vs N M Thomas  Ors1 which was decided by a Bench of seven Judges
The question was whether a certain rule which gave a longer period of exemption to members belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes than to others from passing certain departmental tests in order to be eligible for promotion from the Post of Lower Division Clerk to that of Upper Division Clerk was not violative of article 161 of the Constitution
The Court by a majority of five to two upheld the rule as valid
Ray C J observed The rule of equality within Articles 14 and 161 will not be violated by a rule which will ensure equality of representation in the services for unrepresented classes after satisfying the basic needs of efficiency of administration
Article 162 rules out some basis of classification including race caste descent place of birth etc
Article 164 clarifies and explains that classification on the basis of backwardness does not fall within Article 162 and is legitimate for the purposes of Article 161
If preference shall be given to a particular under represented community other than a backward class or under represented State in an All India Service such a rule will contravene Article 162
A similar rule giving preference to an under represented backward community is valid and will not contravene articles 14 161 and 162
Article 164 removes any doubt in this respect
I  930 933
260 The classification of employees belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for allowing them an extended period of two years for passing the special tests for promotion is a just and reasonable classification having rational nexus to the object of providing equal opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to public office
 xx xx xx The Constitution makes a classification of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in numerous provisions and gives a mandate to the State to accord special or favoured treatment to them xx xx xx Article 335 of the Constitution states that claims of members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration in the making of appointments to the services and posts in connection with affairs of the State consistent with the maintenance of efficiency of administration
The impugned rule and the impugned orders are related to this constitutional mandate Our constitution aims at equality of status and opportunity for all citizens including those who are socially economically and educationally backward
The claims of members Or backward classes require adequate representation in legislative and executive bodies
If members of Scheduled Castes and Tribes who are said by this Court to be backward classes can maintain minimum necessary requirement of administrative efficiency not only representation but also preference may be given to them to enforce equality and to eliminate inequality
Articles 15 4 and 164 bring out the position of backward classes to merit equality Special provisions are made for the advancement of backward classes and reservations of appointments and posts for them to secure adequate representation
These provisions will bring out the content of equality guaranteed by Articles 14 151 and 161
The basic concept of equality is equality of opportunity for appointment
Preferential treatment for members of backward classes with due regard to administrative efficiency alone can mean equality of opportunity for all citizens
Equality under 261 Article 16 could not have a different content from equality under Article 14
Equality of opportunity for unequals can only mean aggravation of inequality Equality of opportunity admits discrimination with reason and prohibits discrimination without reason
Discrimination with reasons means rational classification for differential treatment having n nexus to the constitutionally permissible object
Preferential representation for the backward classes in services with due regard to administrative efficiency is permissible object and backward classes are a rational classification recognised by our Constitution
Therefore differential treatment in standards of selection are within the concept of equality
xx xx xx xx All legitimate methods are available for equality of opportunity in service under Article 161
Article 161 is affirmative whereas Article 14 is negative in language
Article 164 indicates one of the methods of achieving equality embodied in Article 161
Equally illuminating observations were made by Mathew J Beg
 J Krishna Iyer J and Fazal Ali J in their separate concurring opinions but I do not propose to extract them in the interest of space
It is enough to mention that all five learned judges who constituted the majority were emphatic in repudiating the theory propounded in earlier cases that article 164 was in the nature of an exception to article 161
All were agreed that article 164 was a facet an illustration or a method of application of article 161
So it is now no longer necessary to apologetically explain laws aimed at achieving equality as permissible exceptions it can now be boldly claimed that such laws are necessary incidents of equality
It all began with The General Manager Southern Railway vs Rangachari1
Two circulars issued by the Railway Board reserving selection promotional posts in Class III of the Railway Service in favour of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes were questioned in that case as offending article 16
It was contended that article 164 applied only to reservation of posts at the stage of initial appointment and not to promotional posts
The contention was rejected and it was held that article 164 applied at the stage of initial appointment as well as at the stage of promotion by selection
It was in the case that observations were made to the 1  262 effect that article 164 was in the nature of an exception to article 161 but as we have seen such a view is no longer tenable in view of State of Kerala  Anr
vs N M Thomas  Ors
supra
Much of the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioners was anchored to T Devodasan vs Union of Indiaz  Anr1 17 12 of vacancies in an establishment were reserved for members of the scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Alongside the reservation rule there operated what is known as the carry forward rule familiar to all Govt
employees and those connected with service problems 
The carry forward rule so operated in the particular case that out of 45 appointments made by the Government 29 were from among the candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
In other words the reservation Came to 65 which was far in excess of the 177 originally contemplated by the Reservation rule
In those circumstances a Constitution Bench of this Court Subba Rao J dissenting declared the carry forward rule bad
The Court did not strike down the carry forward rule on the ground that it was inherently vicious or on the hypothetical consideration that it was bound to lead to vicious results in the future if permitted to operate without inhibition
The learned judges indicated that the repercussions of such a rule would have to be watched from year to year
Another case upon which the petitioners placed reliance was M R Balaji  Ors
vs State of Mysore2
In that case the percent age of seats reserved in the Engineering and Medical colleges for the educationally and socially backward classes and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes came to 68 leaving only 32 of the seats for the merit pool
The Court held that generally and broadly reservation should not exceed 50
The actual percentage was to depend upon the relevant prevailing circumstances in each case
As the reservation in that case for exceeded what was generally and broadly permissible the reservation was held to be bad
There again the Court was concerned directly with the immediate actual practical result of the Reservation rule
In A Peeriakaruppan etc
Y State of Tamil Nadu  Ors
3 reservation of 41 of the seat in medical college in the State of 1  2 1963 Suppl
I SCR 439
3 1971 2 SCR 430  441 442 263 Tamil Nadu for students coming from socially and educationally back ward classes was upheld
Hegde J observed at p 441 442 There is no basis for the contention that the reservation made for backward classes is excessive
We were not told why it is excessive
Undoubtedly we should not forget that it is against the immediate interest of the Nation to exclude from the portals of our medical colleges qualified and competent students but then the immediate advantages of the Nation have to be harmonised with its long range interests
It cannot be denied that unaided many sections of the people in this country cannot compete with the advanced sections of the Nation
Advantages secured due to historical reasons should not be considered as fundamental mental rights
Nation s interest will be best served taking a long range view if the backward classes are helped to march forward and take their place in line with the advanced sections of the people
That is why in Balaqi s case 1931 Suppl 1 SCR 439 this Court held that the total of reservations for backward classes scheduled castes and scheduled tribes should not ordinarily exceed 50 of the available seats
In the present case it is 41
On the material before us we are unable to hold that the said reservation is excessive
In State of Punjab vs Hiralal  Ors
l a rule reserving the first out of every ten vacancies to a member of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and providing for carry forward  of the vacancy if suitable candidate was not available was struck down by the High Court by visualising various hypothetical cases which could lead to anomalous situations in which a person getting the benefit of reservation may jump over the heads of several of his seniors not only in his own grade but even in higher grades
This Court reversed the decision of the High Court observing The extent of reservation to be made is primarily a matter for the State to decide
By this we do not mean to say that the decision of the State is not open to judicial re view
The reservation must be only for the purpose of giving adequate representation in the service to the Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes
xx xx 1   272 273 274
264 The mere fact that the reservation made may give extensive benefits to some of the persons who have the benefit of the reservation does not by itself make the reservation bad
The length of the leap to be provided depends upon the gap to be covered
xx xx xx xx There was no material before the High Court and there is no material before us from which we can conclude that the impugned order is violative of article 161
Reservation of appointments under article 164 cannot be struck down on hypothetical grounds or on imaginary possibilities
He who assails the reservation under that article must satisfactorily establish that there has been a violation of article 161
The report of the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for 1977 78 and the Reports on the progress made in the intake of Scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes against vacancies reserved for them in recruitment and promotion categories in the Rail ways  for the half years ending March 31 1974 March 31 1975 September 30 1976 March 31 1977 and September 30 1979 were placed before us
they reveal how painfully slow and woefully in significant has been progress achieved by the members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the matter of their participation in the Railway administration
My brother Krishna Iyer J has extracted some of the facts and figures
I do not think it is necessary for me to refer to them over again
It is sufficient to say that members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes far from acquiring any monopolistic or excessive representation over any category of posts other than sweepers are nowhere near being adequately represented
Neither the Reservation rule nor the carry forward for three years  rule has resulted in any such disastrous  consequences
The complaint of the petitioners that the circulars and orders had resulted in excessive representation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is without foundation generally or with reference to any particular year
One of the contentions vehemently submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners was that efficiency of administration would suffer and safety of the travelling public would consequently be jeopardised if reservations were made and promotions affected in the manner sought to be done by the Railway Board
This is claimed by the respondents to be no more than a bogey
In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Railway Board it has been pointed out that minimum standards arc insisted upon for every appointment 265 and in the case of candidates wanting in requisite standards those h with the highest marks are given special intensive training to enable them to come up to the requisite standards
In the case of posts which involve the safety of movement of trains there is no relaxation of standards in favour of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and they are required to pass the same rigid tests as other candidates
Therefore we see that when posts whether at the stage of initial appointment or at the state of promotion are reserved or other preferential treatment is accorded to members of the Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes and other socially and economically backward classes it is not a concession or privilege extended to them it is in recognition of their undoubted Fundamental Right to Equality of Opportunity and in discharge of the Constitutional obligation imposed upon the state to secure to all its citizens Justice social economic and political  and Equality to status and opportunity  to assure the dignity of the individual  among all citizens to promote with special D care the educational and economic interests of the weaker section of the people  to ensure their participation on equal basis in the administration of the affairs of the country and generally to foster the ideal of a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic 
Every lawful method is permissible to secure the due representation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the public Services
There is no fixed ceiling to reservation or preferential treatment in favour of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes though generally reservation may not be far in excess of fifty percent
There is no rigidity about the fifty percent rule which is only a convenient guideline laid down by Judges
Every case must be decided with reference to the present practical results yielded by the application of the particular rule of preferential treatment and not with reference to hypothetical results which the application of the rule may yield in the future
Judged in the light of this discussion I am unable to find anything illegal or unconstitutional in any one of the impugned orders and circulars
Each order and circular has been individually discussed by my brother Krishna Iyer J with whose reasoning and conclusions I agree and to which I wish to add no more
PBR Petitions dismissed


Summary:
In so far as the initial recruitment and later promotion to classes II III and IV are concerned the Railway Administration provided for reservation of certain percentage of vacancies for candidates belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Since despite the special provision the intake of these communities into the Railway Services continued to be negligible further concessions and relaxations were offered from time to time to members belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Even so in many cases the vacancies reserved for them remained unfilled
Yet another step taken by the Railway Administration to keep open the reserved vacancies was to adopt a policy of carry forward of the unfilled reserved vacancies for at least three years
In obedience to the policy decision of the Ministry of Home Affairs the Railway Board issued certain directives designed to protect and promote the interest of members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the matter of their employment in the Railway Administration
The policy directive of reserving certain percentage of posts in favour of these communities having not proved effective the Railway Board altered the rules with a view to securing increased representation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Railway Services Annexure D
The Railway Board authorised the recruiting bodies to slur over low places obtained by Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates except where it was found that the minimum standard necessary for the maintenance of efficiency of the administration had not been reached
The appointing authorities were directed to give additional training and coaching to the recruits so that they might come up to the standard of other recruits appointed alongwith them
Likewise where direct recruitment otherwise than by examination was provided for the Railway Board directed the selection of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates fulfilling a lower standard of suitability than from other communities so long as the candidates had the prescribed minimum educational and technical qualifications and the appointing authorities were satisfied that the lowering of standards would not unduly affect the maintenance of efficiency of administration
In the case of selection posts the Railway Board decided that promotions from class IV to class III and from class III to class II were of the nature of direct recruitment and the prescribed quota of reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes should be provided as in direct recruitment
This reser 186 vation was confined to selection posts 
In regard to filling of general posts in class III it was stated that they were in the nature of direct recruitment and the reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as applicable to direct recruitment should be applied
Annexure F
In 1969 the Railway Board further revised their policy in regard to the reservation and other concessions to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates in posts filled by promotion Annexure H
The circular stated that in promotion by selection from class III to class II if a member of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was within the zone of eligibility the employee would be given one grading higher than the grading otherwise assignable to him on the basis of his record of service
In April 1970 the percentage of vacancies to be reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes was raised from 1212 and 5 to 15 and 712 respectively Annexure I
By the same order the carry forward rule was altered from 2 to 3 years
In 1973 the Railway Board issued a directive stating that the quota of 15 and 712 for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes may be provided promotion to the categories and posts in classes I II III and IV filled on the basis of the seniority cum suitability provided the element of direct recruitment to those grades does not exceed 50 Annexure K
In August 1974 the Railway Board further directed that if the requisite number of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates were not available for being placed on the panel in spite of the various relaxations the best among them ie those who secure highest marks should be earmarked for being placed on the panel to the extent vacancies had been reserved in their favour
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates so earmarked might be promoted ad hoc for a period of six months against the vacancies reserved for them
During the period of six months the administration was asked to give them all facilities for improving their knowledge and for coming upto the requisite standard
The procedure was required to be applied in cases of promotion to the posts filled on the basis of seniority cum suitability Annexure N
A further modification to the then existing rules was made by Annexure O  which stated that reservations in posts filled by promotion under the existing scheme would be applicable to all grades or services where the element of direct recruitment if any does not exceed 66 23 as against 50 as at present
It was contended on behalf of the petitioners that Scheduled Castes cannot be a favoured class in the public services because i they are castes and cannot claim preference qua castes unless specially saved by Article 164 which speaks of class and not castes ii that Article 164 could not apply to promotional levels and iii efficiency of administration envisaged by Article 335 had been jeopardised by the impugned circulars which fomented frustration among the civil services and produced inefficiency by placing men of lower efficiency and less experience in higher posts
187 A preliminary objection was raised that since the first petitioner was an unrecognised union it was not a person aggrieved and so its petition was unsustainable
Dismissing the petitions Per majority Krishna Iyer and Chinnappa Reddy JJ Pathak J concurring in the result with reservation on certain questions There is nothing illegal or unconstitutional in the impugned orders
Per Krishna Iyer J The argument that since the first petitioner was an unrecognized association the petition is not sustainable must be overruled because whether the petitioners belonged to a recognised union or not the fact remains that a large body of persons with a common grievance exists and they approached this Court under Article 32
Our current processual jurisprudence is broad based and people oriented and envisions access to justice through class actions public interest litigation and representative proceedings
The narrow concept of cause of action and person aggrieved and individual litigation is becoming obsolescent in some jurisdictions
224 G H The well settled position in law is that the State may classify based upon substantial differentia groups or classes and this process does not necessarily spell violation of Articles 14 to 16
Therefore in the present case if the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes stand on a substantially different footing they may be classified groupwise and treated separately
232 B C The fundamental right of equality of opportunity has to be read as justifying the categorisation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes separately for the purpose of adequate representation in the services under the State
The object is constitutionally sanctioned in terms as Article 164 and 46 specificate
The classification is just and reasonable
233 G H Apart from Article 161 Article 162 expressly forbids discrimination on the ground of caste and here the question arises as to whether the Scheduled Castes and Tribes are castes within the meaning of Article 162
Assuming that there is discrimination Article 162 cannot be invoked unless it is predicated that the Scheduled Castes are castes
There are sufficient indications in the Constitution to suggest that the Scheduled Castes are not mere castes
They may be something less or something more and the time badge is not the fact that the members belong to a caste but the circumstance that they belong to an indescribably backward human group
234 A C Articles 14 to 16 form a Code by themselves and contain a constitutional fundamental guarantee
The Directive Principles which are fundamental in the governance of the country enjoin upon the State the duty to apply that principle in making laws
Article 46 obligates the State the promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and in particular of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
Article 46 read with Article 164 makes it clear that the exploited lot of the harijan groups in the past shall be extirpated with special care by the State
A C 188 At the same time reservations under Article 164 and promotional strategies under Article 46 should not be used to imperil administrative efficiency in the name of concessions to backward classes
The positive accent of Article 335 is that the claims of these communities to equalisation of representation in services under the State shall be taken into consideration
The negative element of this Article is that measures taken by the State pursuant to the mandate of Articles 164 46 and 335 shall be consistent with and not subversive of the maintenance of efficiency of administration
211 D F Under Article 341 Scheduled Castes become such only if the President specifies any castes races or tribes or parts or groups within castes races or tribes for the purpose of the Constitution
It is the socioeconomic backwardness of a social bracket that is decisive and not mere birth in a caste
212 A Annexure F relates only to selection posts and has been expressly upheld in Rangachari s case
The quantum of reservation is not excessive the field of eligibility is not too unreasonable the operation of the reservation is limited to selection posts and no relaxation of qualifications is written into the circular except that candidates of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes communities should be judged in a sympathetic manner
Moreover administrative efficiency is secure because there is a direction to give such staff additional training and coaching to bring them upto the standard of others
239 F G There is no vice in giving one grade higher than is otherwise assignable to an employee
based on the record of his service rendering the promotional prospects unreasonable because this concession is confined to only 25 of the total number of vacancies in a particular grade or post filled in a year and there is no rampant vice of every harijan jumping over the heads of others
More importantly this is only an administrative device of showing a concession or furtherance of prospects of selection
Even as under Articles 154 and 164 lesser marks are prescribed as sufficient for these communities or extra marks are added to give them an advantage the regrading is one more method of boosting the chances of selection of these communities
The prescribed minimum qualification and standard of fitness are continued even for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Annexure H 240 B D Annexure I is unexceptionable since all that it does is to readjust the proportion of reservation in conformity with the latest census
240 E F Similarly carry forward raised from two years to three years cannot be struck down
There is no prospect even if the vacancies are carried forward of sufficient number of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates turning out to fill them
Moreover there is a provision that if a sufficient number of candidates from these communities are not found applicants from the unreserved communities would be given appointment provisionally
After three years these vacancies cease to be reserved
240 G A Even in Devadasan s case this Court has laid down the proposition that under Article 164 reservation of a reasonable percentage of posts for member of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is within the competence of the State
What was struck down was that the reservations should not be so excessive as to create a monopoly or to disturb unduly the legitimate claims of other communities
By this rule there is no danger of the total vacancies 189 being gobbled up by the harijangirijan groups virtually obliterating Article 161
The problem of giving adequate representation to backward classes under Article 164 is a matter for the Government to consider bearing in mind the need for a reasonable balance between the rival claims
241 B F Subject to the condition that the carry forward rule shall not result in any given year in the selection or appointment of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes candidates considerably in excess of 50 the Annexure I is upheld
242 E There is nothing unreasonable or wrong in Annexure J
Once the parameters of reservation are within the framework of the fundamental rights minute scrutiny of every administrative measure is not permissible
242 F Annexure K is beyond reproach
As between selection and non selection posts the role of merit is functionally more relevant in the former than in the latter
If in selecting top officers posts could be reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes with lesser merit it cannot rationally be argued that for the posts of peons or lower division clerks reservation would spell calamity
The part that efficiency plays is far more in the case of higher posts than in the appointments to the lower posts
243 D Dilution of efficiency caused by the minimal induction of a small percentage of reserved candidates cannot affect the over all administrative efficiency significantly
Moreover care has been taken to give in service training and coaching to correct the deficiencies
244 B C Chinnappa Reddy J concurring The preamble to the Constitution of India proclaims the resolution of the people to secure to all its citizens justice social economic and political equality of status and opportunity and to promote fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual
The right to equality before the law and equality of opportunity in the matter of public employment are guaranteed as fundamental rights
The State is enjoined upon by the Directive Principles to promote the welfare of the people to endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status facilities and opportunities and special provisions have been made in particular for the protection and advancement of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in recognition of their low social and economic status and their failure to avail themselves of any opportunity of self advancement
In short the constitutional goal is the establishment of a socialist democracy in which justice economic social and political is secure and all men are equal and have equal opportunity
Inequality whether of status facility or opportunity is to end privilege is to cease and exploitation is to go
The under privileged the deprived and the exploited are to be protected and nourished so as to take their place in an egalitarian society
State action is to be towards those ends
It is in this context that Article 16 has to be interpreted when State action is questioned as contravening Article 16
255 A F A Constitution such as ours must receive generous interpretation so as to give an its citizens the full measure of justice so proclaimed
While interpreting the Constitution the expositors must concern themselves not so much with words as with the spirit and sense of the Constitution which could be found in the Preamble the Directive Principles and other such provisions
256 G 190 At one time it was assumed that because the fundamental rights are enforce able in a court of law while Directive Principles are not the former were superior to the latter that way of thinking has become obsolete
The current thinking is that while Fundamental Rights are primarily aimed at assuring political freedom to the citizens against excessive State action the Directive Principles are aimed at securing social and economic freedoms by appropriate State action
The Directive Principles are made unenforceable in a limited sense because no Court can compel a Legislature to make laws
But that does not mean that they are less important than Fundamental Rights or that they are not binding on the various organs of the State
They are all the same fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be the duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws
The Directive Principles should serve the Courts as a Code of Interpretation
Every law attacked on the ground of infringement of Fundamental Right should be examined to see if the impugned law does not advance one or other of the Directive Principles or if it is not in the discharge of some of the undoubted obligations of the State towards its citizens flowing out of the Preamble the Directive Principles and other provisions of the Constitution
257 A G Reservation of posts and all other measures designed to promote the participation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in public services at all levels are a necessary consequence flowing from the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by Article 161
This very idea is emphasized further by Article 164 which is not in the nature of an exception to Article 161 but a facet of that Article
In the State of Kerala vs NM Thomas the court has repudiated the theory propounded in earlier cases that Article 164 is in the nature of an exception to Article 161
It is no longer correct to say that laws aimed at achieving equality as permissible exceptions
Such laws are necessary incidents of equality
258 D F Minister of Home Affairs vs Fisher 19793 All ER 21 State of Kerala  Anr
vs NM Thomas  Ors
1976 1 SCR 906  930 933 and The General Manager Southern Railway vs Rangachari 19622 SCR 586 referred to
The figures quoted from the report of the Commissioner of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for the year 1977 78 reveal how slow and insignificant the progress achieved by the members of these communities in the matter of participation in the Railway Administration had been
Far from acquiring any monopolistic or excessive representation over any category of posts these communities are nowhere near being adequately represented
Neither the reservation rule nor the carry forward rule for these years has resulted in any such disastrous consequence
Therefore the complaint of the petitioners that the circulars had resulted in excessive representation of these communities is without foundation generally or with reference to any particular year
246 D G There is no substance in the argument that efficiency of administration would suffer if the Railway Board s directives were followed in the matter of reservations and promotions
The Railway Board had stated that minimum standards were insisted upon for every appointment and in the case of candidates wanting in requisite standards of efficiency those with higher marks were given special intensive training to enable them to come up to the requisite standards
In the case of posts which involved safety of movement of trains there was no 191 relaxation of standards in favour of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and they were required to pass the same rigid tests as others265 A B There is no fixed ceiling to reservation or preferential treatment in favour of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes though generally reservation may not be far in excess of 50 about which there is no rigidity
Every case must be decided on its own facts
265 E There is nothing illegal or unconstitutional in any one of the impugned orders and circulars
265 G Pathak J concurring in the result with reservation on certain questions Article 46 of the Constitution enjoins upon the State to treat with special care the educational and economic interest of the weaker sections of the people and in particular the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
One of the modes in which the economic interest of these communities can be promoted is by reservation of appointments or posts in their favour in services under the State where they are not adequately represented
By virtue of Article 164 when the State intends to make reservation of appointments or posts in favour of these communities in services under it nothing in Article 16 prevents it from doing so
Article 335 provides that claims of the members of these communities shall be taken into consideration in the making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or a State
But such consideration must be consistent with the maintenance of efficiency of administration which is regarded as paramount
It is dictated by the common good and not of a mere section of the people
Therefore whatever is done in considering the claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes must be consistent with the need for maintenance of efficiency of administration
This Article contains a single principle namely the advancement of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes but through modes and avenues which must not detract from the maintenance of an efficient administration
250 B H For securing an efficient administration the governing criterion in the matter of appointments to posts under the State is excellence and the emphasis is solely on quality
The selection is made regardless of religion race caste sex descent place of birth or residence
However a quota of the posts may be reserved in favour of backward citizens
But the interests of efficient administration require that at least half the total number of posts be kept open to attract the best of the nation s talent
If it was otherwise an excess of the reserved quota would convert the State service into a collective membership predominantly of backward classes
The maintenance of efficiency of administration is bound to be adversely affected if general candidates of high merit are correspondingly excluded from recruitment
Viewed in that light the maximum of 50 for reserved quota appears fair and reasonable just and equitable violation of which would contravene Article 335
251 B D M R Balaji vs State of Mysore 1963 Supp 1 SCR 439 470 T Devadasan vs Union of India 19644 SCR 680 and State of Kerala vs N M Thomas 19761 SCR 906 referred to 192