Civil Appeal Nos 295  296 NT of 1974
From the Judgment and Order dated 1971973 of the Kerala High Court in ITR Nos 32 and 33 of 1971
section Poti section Sukumaran and DN Mishra for the Appellant
GC Sharma KC Dua and Miss A Subhashini for the Respondent
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SABYASACHI MUKHARJI J
These two appeals arise by certificate by the High Court in Income Tax Reference Nos 32 and 33 of 1971
The High Court of Kerala by its judgment dated 19th July 1973 answered the following two questions in the negative and in favour of the revenue i Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the sums of Rs 290220 and Rs 363750 were not assessable as income of the assessee for the assessment years 1960 61 and 1961 62 ii Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law and had material for holding that the sums of Rs 290220 and Rs 363750 are exempt from taxation under section 43vii of the Indian Income tax Act 1922 for the assessment years 1960 61 and 1961 62 respectively The references relates to assessment years 1960 61 and 1961 62
The assessee s accounting year was the calender year
940 The assessee publishes a Malyalam daily newspaper by name Kerala Dhwani
Till 1953 he was a lecturer in History and Political Science in the College at Kottayam
He had his education in the United State of America during 1953 to 1957
During this period of stay in the USA he had the privilege of associating himself with the India Gospel Mission in the United States
The India Gospel Mission it was stated was collecting money for its working abroad through the Indian Christian Crusade
The assessee was also publishing a religious magazine called Viswa Deepam
The magazine was started in January 1957
The father of the assessee Shri KG Thomas was the Editor of Viswa Deepam
Shri Thomas was also in America and he was also doing missionary work in America for some time
In 1958 Shri Thomas the lather of the assessee was in India the was going to America off and on
Indian Christian Crusade USA is an institution sponsoring religious education in India and it was admitted that the assessee was propagating the ideals of the Indian Christian Crusade on returning to India after finishing his education in the States
Later on the assessee started publishing a paper called Kerala Dhwani
This paper was started in 1959
While the assessee was in America he took his PhD degree
For the assessment year 1960 61 the assessee filed a return disclosing a loss of Rs 159894 under the head business 
The assessee as mentioned hereinbefore was publishing Malayalam daily newspaper called Kerala Dhwani 
While t scrutinising the accounts the Income tax Officer found in the ledger folio in the name of the assessee amounts totalling Rs 257138 credited in  his account
The assessee was asked to explain these credits and he represented that most of the amounts were received by the assessee as donations from USA through an organisation known as Indian Christian Crusade USA The Income tax Officer found that the names and other details of persons who had donated the amounts were not available
He also found that such amounts amounted in all Rs 290220
The Income tax Officer had stated that in the absence of definite information regarding the individuals who has made the donations it had to be presumed that the amounts had been given by the Indian Christian Crusade USA to the assessee
The assessee s case before the Income tax Officer was that the amounts received by the assessee were purely personal gifts and testimonials which were given because of the esteem and regard for the personal qualities of the assessee and that the payments were purely voluntary
The Income tax Officer rejected the contention
He held 941 i The payment of donations started simultaneously with the publication of the daily newspaper Kerala Dhwani and the donations were continued during the period the publication continued
ii The donations were regular and continued for the next year also
iii There was nothing to show that the amounts were given on account of the personal qualities of the assessee
iv The donations were being made regularly throughout the year and these were evidently given as aid to the running of the newspaper which was the business carried on by the assessee
v The Indian Christian Crusade USA which was paying money to the assessee was an enterprise in India established for the furtherence of ideals and objectives similar to theirs
For aforesaid reasons the Income tax Officer held that the so called donations were payments by way of remuneration for the work done by the assessee in connection with the spreading in India of the ideals of the Indian Christian Crusade USA The Income tax Officer came to the conclusion that the amounts paid to the assessee were connected with the business of the assessee and were liable to be taxed as the business income of the assessee
He therefore brought to tax Rs 290220 which had been received during the assessment year
For the next assessment year the assessee had received similar amounts totalling to Rs 363750 through the Indian Christian Crusade USA
For the reasons given in the order of the previous year the Income tax Officer treated this amount also as the business income for the assessment year 1961 62 and brought the same to tax
The assessee filed appeals in respect of both the years and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disposed of the appeals by different orders delivered on the same date
He discussed all the contentions raised by the assessee in his appellate orders
The main contention raised by the assessee before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was that the various amounts credited in his bank account and in his personal account in the business represented gifts made by personal friends in the USA that the amounts were collected by the Indian Christian Crusade and forwarded to India to the assessee
The Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejecting these contentions of the assessee found that the assessee was a journalist and it was his avocation or vocation to propagate certain ideas and ideals
He was closely associated with the missionary work carried on by the Indian Christian Crusade in America and he was propagating the ideals of 942 Indian Christian Crusade America in India because of his close relationship with that origination as mentioned hereinbefore
The assessee during his stay in USA and after his return was engaged in a movement for the spread of religion and fighting the forces of atheism
According to the assessee his friends in America and those Who believed in the cause which he sponsored were sending him donations for helping tile movement and the amounts that were handed over to or were collected by the Indian Christian Crusade USA were remitted to him
In further appeal the Tribunal held that the amounts did not represent remuneration or payments for services rendered
The tribunal further held that the receipts were clearly causal and non recurring and aid not arise in the course of the exercise of any vocation
Then the aforesaid two questions were referred to the High Court under Section 66 1 of the Indian Income tax Act 1922
The High Court held that the receipts of casual and non recurring nature would not be included in the total income of a person
But if there were receipts arising from the exercise of a vocation these would be included in the total income even if these were of casual or non recurring nature or voluntary and the receipts resulting from such payments would be outside Section 43vii of the Income tax Act 1922 hereinafter referred to as the  Act 
Relying on the findings of the Tribunal the High Court held that the assessee was very actively fully occupied with the activities connected with achieving the objects of straightening faith in God and fighting against atheism and was occupied with this affair
The payer which he published for this purpose was a daily coming out with views in support of this mission
Teaching and propagating religion could be an occupation
It was not necessary that its object should be to earn a livelihood
Anything in which a person was engaged systematically could be an occupation or vocation
The next question would be whether receipts could be said to arise from such occupation or vocation
There was link between the activity of the assessee and the payments and that the payments were made by those who held similar views as those of the assessee and who were very much interested in the propagation and the acceptance of those views by the general public
The payments were made for the purpose of helping the assessee to run the paper which was the mouth piece or medium through which the ideas were to be spread
The 943 connection between the activity of the assessee and the donations was thus intimate
lt arose out of the vocation or the occupation carried on by the assessee
Therefore the receipts arose from the exercise of an occupation by the assessee
The high Court also considered whether such payments were excluded by Section 43vii of the Act
Section 4 of the Act made the total income of the previous year of any person assessable to tax and sub section 3 specified certain incomes which should not be included in the total income of the person
Sub section vii of Section 43 was in the following terms vii any receipts not being capital gains chargeable according to the provisions of section 12B and not being receipts arising from business or the exercise of a profession vocation or occupation which are of a casual and non recurring nature or are not by way of addition to the remuneration of an employee
As the section made it clear in order to be entitled to exemption the receipts must be of income character first
In the instant case there is no doubt that if a sum of money is received for the purpose in pursuance of an avocation or vocation it arose out of this vocation or profession
If this is so then this was income under the Act
Such income could only be excluded if it was specifically excluded by any provision of the Act
The High Court held and in our opinion rightly that in view of the facts and circumstances of this case as found by the Tribunal these amounts were not excluded under Section 43vii of the Act
The position was thus these amounts were received by the assessee in the course of his avocation or vocation and were given to him for the purpose of the same
These were therefore incomes which were not also of a casual or non recurring nature nor were these capital gains under Section 12B of the Act
If that was the position then in our opinion the amounts were clearly taxable as held by the Income tax Officer and by the High Court
Several aspects of the question were placed before us on a large canvass namely that the High Court had gone into facts of the first time over ruling the findings of the fact of the Tribunal without there being a question to that effect and also there was no finding that the receipts were of income character
In support of these contentions several decisions of this Court were referred before us Inter alia Parimisetti Seetharamma vs 944 Commissioner of Income Tax Andhra Pradesh
 Reliance was placed on the observations appearing at pages 536 537 and 538 of the said report
It was urged that the burden of proof was wrongly placed by the High Court and on the facts that the two circumstances relied on by the High Court did not establish that certain money was given to the assessee as remuneration for services and as such it could not be held that the person concerned was assessable to tax
It was urged that the High Court wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the assessee
But on the facts and in the circumstance of this case the conclusion recorded by the High Court in the instant case was borne out on the facts on record
The observations of this Court referred to above cannot be of much assistance to the assessee
The case which is most apposite to the facts of the instant case is a decision of this Court in the case of P Krishna Menon vs Commissioner of Income Tax Mysore Travancore Cochin and Coorg
Bangalore
 There after retirement from Government service the appellant therein was spending his time in studying and teaching Vedanta philosophy
L who was one of his disciples used to come from London at regular intervals to Trivendrum where the appellant resided and stay there for a few months at a time and attend his discourses and so received instructions in Vedanta and had the benefits of his teachings
L transferred his entire balance standing to this credit in his on account at Bombay amounting to more that Rs 2 lakhs to the account of the appellant opened in the letter s name in the same bank at Bombay
Thereafter from time to time L put in further sums into the appellant s account in Bombay
The question was whether the receipts from L constituted the appellants income taxable under the Travancore Income Tax Act 1121 Malayalam Era which was identical with the Indian Income Tax Act 1922
It was held that teaching was a vocation if not a profession and teaching Vedanta was just as much teaching as any other teaching and therefore a vocation that in order that an activity might be called a vocation it was not necessary to show that it was an organised activity and that it was indulged with a motive of making profit it was well established that it was not the motive of a person doing an act which decided whether the act done by him was the carrying on of a business profession or vocation and if any business profession or vocation in fact produced an income that was taxable income and none the less so because it was carried on without the motive of producing an income that teaching of Vendetta by the appellant in that case was the 945 carrying on of a vocation by him and that the imparting of the teaching was the causa causans of the making of the gifts by L and it was impossible to hold that the payments to the appellant had not been made in consideration of the teaching imparted by him and that therefore the payments were income arising from the vocation of the appellants that the payments made by L were income arising from a vocation
These were not casual or non recurring receipts and no question of exemption under Section 43vii of the Act arose
It was further observed that in order that a payment might be exempted under Section 43vii as a casual and non recurring receipt it had to be shown that it did not arise from the exercise of a vocation
In the instant case before us identical is the position
The assessee carried on a vocation of preaching against atheism
In the course of such vocation and for the purpose of the same he received the amounts in question as donation for the furtherance of the objects of his vocation
The receipts arose to the assessee for the carrying on of the vocation by the assessee and these were not casual and non recurring
These were taxable
These facts were found by the Income tax Officer
These facts not in so many terms but essentially found by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and were reiterated by the Tribunal and the High Court accepted these findings of facts and answered the question accordingly
Reliance was also placed on the decisions of the Gujarat High Court in the case of the Acharya DV Pande vs Commissioner of Income tax Gujarat  and Commissioner of Income tax Gujarat vs Shri Girdharram Hariram Bhagat  decisions of the Bombay High Court in the Case of Maharaj Shri Govindlalji Ranchhodlalji vs Commissioner of Income tax Ahmedabad  and HH Maharani Shri Vijaykuverba Shed of Morvi and Another vs Commissioner of Income tax Bombay City II  decision of the Madras High Court in the case of SA Ramakrishnan vs Commissioner of Income tax Madras  and decision of the Delhi high Court in the case of Siddhartha Publications P Ltd vs Commissioner of Income tax Delhi  dealing with certain facts and circumstances where income could be said be taxable
From all these decisions two facts emerge
The burden is on the revenue to establish that the receipt is of a revenue character
Once receipt is found to be of a revenue character 946 whether it comes under exemption or not it is for the assessee to establish
Facts must be found by the Tribunal and the High Court must proceed on the basis of the facts found by the Tribunal
The High Court cannot afresh go to the facts over ruling the facts found by the Tribunal unless there is a question to that effect challenging the facts found by the Tribunal
These propositions are well settled and in this case in the decision of the High Court these principles in our opinion have not been breached
It has been established that the assessee was carrying on a vocation the vocation preaching of Christian Gospel and helping anti atheism was the vocation of his life
He was running a newspaper in aid of that
The donations received from America were to help him for the said purpose
They arose out of his carrying on and continued so long as he carried on this avocation or vocation
These receipts therefore arose out of his vocation
These were therefore his income
In the facts these were not exempt under Section 43vii of the Act
In the premises these were taxable
Numerous decisions were referred to us on the question as to how far the High Court could interfere with the facts found by the Tribunal
Reliance was placed on the decisions of this Court in the case Karnani Properties Ltd vs Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal  Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd vs Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal  Anil Kumar Roy Chowdhury and Others vs Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal II  Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal III vs Kamal Singh Rampuria  Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal III vs Imperial Chemical Industries India P Ltd  and the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income tax Bombay City II vs Deviprasad Khandelwal and Co Ltd  and also the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income tax vs PS Chelladurai
 145 ITR 139
We have set out the findings of the Tribunal and considered the findings of the Tribunal as well as the judgment of the High Court
There has not been any unwarranted interference by the High Court with the facts found by the Tribunal
Basic facts have been found by the Tribunal
On the question where income could be said to arise it may be relevant to refer to Strong  Co of Romsey Limited vs Woodifield Surveyor of Taxes  There a brewery 947 company owned an inn which was carried on by the manager as part of their business
A customer sleeping in the inn was injured by the fall of a chimney and recovered damages and costs against the company for the injury which was owing to the negligence of the company s servants
The question was whether the amounts paid as damages could be claimed as a deduction from the business of s carrying on the activities of the inn keeper
The Lord Chancellor observed at page 452 of the report as follows I think only such losses can be deducted as are connected with in the sense that they are really incidental to the trade itself
They cannot be deducted if they are mainly incidental to some other vocation or fall on the trader in some character other than that of trader
The nature of the trade is to be considered
To give an illustration losses sustained by a railway company in compensating passengers for accidents in travelling might be deducted
On the other hand if a man kept a grocer s shop for keeping which a house is necessary and one of the window shutters fell upon and injured a man walking in the street the loss arising thereby to the grocer ought not be deducted
Many cases might be put near the line and no degree of ingenuity can frame a formula so precise and comprehensive as to solve at sight all the cases that may arise
In the case of The Commissioner of Inland Revenue vs EC Warnes  Co Ltd  at page 231 of the Report Rowlatt J observed I may shelter myself behind the authority of Lord Loreburn who in his judgment in the House of Lords in Strong  Co vs Woodifield said that it is impossible to frame any formula which shall describe what is a loss connected with or arising out of a trade
That statement I adopt and 1 am not sure that I gain very much by going through a number of analogies but it seems to me that a penal liability of this kind cannot be regarded as a loss connected with or arising out a trade
In the instant case there cannot be any doubt that the receipts by the assessee arose out of the avocation of the assessee of propagating views against atheism and preaching Christian Gospel
948 In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there was a link between the activities of the assessee and the payments received by him and the link was close enough
In that view of the matter in our opinion the High Court was right in answering both the questions referred to it in the negative and in favour of the revenue
The appeals accordingly fail and are dismissed with costs
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No 10046 of 1976 for condonation of delay in filing the additional papers is allowed
APJ Appeals dismissed


Summary:
The assessee appellant had associated himself with the India Gospel Mission while he was getting his education in the United States of America during 1953 to 1957 and was propagating the ideals of Indian Christian Crusade USA an Institution sponsoring religious education in India
The India Gospel Mission was collecting money for its working abroad through the Indian Christian Crusade
On returning to India in January 1957 he started publishing a religious magazine called Viswa Deepam and in 1959 started publishing Malyalam daily newspaper called Kerala Dhwani
In the assessment year 1960 61 he filed a return disclosing a 1088 of Rs 159894 under the head business 
While scrutinising the accounts the Income Tax Office found amounts totalling Rs 290220 credited in the assessee s accounts
Since the names and other details of persons who had donated the amounts were not available it had to be presumed that the amounts had been given to the assessee by the Indian Christian Crusade USA and therefore the Income Tax Officer rejected the contention of the assessee that the amounts received by him were purely personal gifts and testimonials made voluntarily and held that the so called donations were payments by way of remuneration for the work done by the assessee in connection with the spreading in India of the ideals of the Indian Christian Crusade USA and that these amounts were connected with the business of the assessee and were liable to be taxed as his business Income
He therefore brought to tax Rs 290220 which had been received during the assessment year 1960 61
For the assessment year 1961 62 the assessee had received similar amounts totalling to Rs 363750 through the Indian Christian Crusade USA and Income Tax Officer treated this amount also as business income and brought the same to tax
937 The assessee filed appeals and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner while dismissing the appeals held that the assessee was a journalist and it was his avocation or vocation to propagate Christian ideas and ideals and that the assessee during the stay in USA and after his return was engaged in a movement for the spread of religion and for fighting the forces of atheism
In further appeal the tribunal held that the amounts did not represent remuneration or payments for services rendered and that the receipts were clearly casual and non recurring and did not arise in the course of the exercise of any vocation
The Tribunal referred the matter to the High Court which held that the receipts of casual and non recurring nature would not be included in the total income of a person
But if there was receipts arising from the exercise of vocation these would be included in the total income even if these were of a casual or non recurring nature or voluntary and the receipts resulting from such payments would be outside section 43vii of the Income Tax Act 1922
Since there was link between the activity of the assessee and the payments and the same were made by those who held similar views and who were interested in the propagation and the acceptance of those views by the general public the receipts therefore arose from the exercise of an occupation by the assessee
Dismissing the Appeals  HELD 1
The receipts by the assessee arose out of the avocation of the assessee of propagating views against Atheism ant preaching Christian Gospel
947 H 2
There was a link between the activities of the assessee and the payments received by him and the link was close enough
948 A Strong  Company of Romsey Limited vs Woodifield Surveyor of Taxes  and The Commissioner of Inland Revenue vs EC Warnes  Co Ltd 1919 12 TC 227 referred to
Section 43vii of the Indian Income Tax Act 1922 makes it clear that in order to be entitled to the exemption the receipts must be of income character first
if a sum of money is received for the purpose in pursuance of an avocation or vocation it arose out of this vocation or profession
If that is 938 so then this was income under the Act
Such income could only be excluded if it was specifically excluded by any provision of the Act
943 D E 4
The High Court rightly held that in view of the facts and circumstances of this case as found by the Tribunal these amounts were received by the assessee in the course of his avocation or vocation and were given to him for the purpose of the same
These were therefore incomes which were neither of a casual or non recurring nature nor were these capital gains under section 12B of the Act
The amounts were therefore clearly taxable as held by the Income Tax Officer and by the High Court
943 E G P Krishna Menon vs Commissioner of Income Tax Mysore Travancore Cochin and Coorg
Bangalore  relied upon
The burden 18 on the revenue to establish that the receipt is of a revenue character
Once receipt is found to be of a revenue character whether it comes under exemption or not it is for the assessee to establish
Facts must be found by the Tribunal and the High Court must proceed on the basis of those facts
The High Court cannot afresh go to the facts over ruling the facts found by the Tribunal unless there is a question to that effect challenging the facts as found by the Tribunal
In this case the High Court has not interfered with the basic facts found by the Tribunal
It has been established that the assessee was carrying on a vocation of preaching of Christian Gospel and helping anti athesim
He was running a newspaper in aid of that
The donations received from America were to help him for the said purpose
They arose out of his carrying on and contained so long purpose
The carried on this avocation or vocation
These receipts therefore arose out of his vocation
These were therefore his Income not exempt under s43vii of the Act and were taxable
945 H 946 A C Parimisetti Seetharamma vs Commissioner of Income Tax Andhra Pradesh inapplicable
Acharya DV Pande vs Commissioner of Income tax Gujarat  Commissioner of Income Tax Gujarat vs Shri Giurdharram Hariram Bhagat  Maharaj Shri Govindlalji Ranchhodlaji vs Commissioner of Income tax Ahmedabad  HH Maharani Shri Vijay Kuverba Saheb of Morvi and Another vs Commissioner of Income Tax Bombay City II SA Ramkrishnan vs Commissioner of Income tax Madras  Siddhartha Publications P Ltd vs Commissioner of 939 Income tax Delhi  Karnani Properties Ltd vs Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal  Aluminium Corporation of India Ltd vs Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal  Anil Kumar Roy Chowdhury and Others vs Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal II  Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal III vs Kamal Singh Rampuria  Commissioner of Income tax West Bengal III vs Imperial Chemical Industries India P Ltd  Commissioner of Income tax Bombay City II vs Devi Prasad Khandelwal and Co Ltd  and Commissioner of Income tax vs PS Chelladurai  referred to