Aiera/finqa-verified huggingface dataset:
the following table provides certain information as of may 31 , 2014 concerning the shares of the company 2019s common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans . for more information on these plans , see note 11 to notes to consolidated financial statements . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 766801 $ 40.85 8945694 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2014 2014 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )|weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )|number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|766801|$ 40.85|8945694|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders|2014|2014|2014|
|total|766801|$ 40.85|8945694|
the information presented in the table above includes shares of common stock available for issuance other than upon the exercise of an option , warrant or right under the employee stock purchase plan and the 2011 incentive plan . in addition , it includes 977296 shares authorized under the amended and restated 2005 incentive plan and 584004 shares authorized under the 2000 long-term incentive plan . as previously disclosed , we do not intend to issue shares under either the amended and restated 2005 incentive plan or the 2000 long-term incentive plan . item 13 2014 certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence we incorporate by reference in this item 13 the information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between us and our affiliates and the independence of our directors contained under the headings 201ccertain relationships and related transactions 201d and 201cboard independence 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders . item 14 2014principal accounting fees and services we incorporate by reference in this item 14 the information regarding principal accounting fees and services contained under the heading 201cratification of the reappointment of auditors 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. .

Question: what is the total value of securities issued and approved by security holders , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 31.32
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
||( in millions )|
|2002 net revenue|$ 380.2|
|base rates|48.3|
|other|-1.9 ( 1.9 )|
|2003 net revenue|$ 426.6|
the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc . gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power . this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales . fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs . the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue for entergy mississippi , inc . in 2003?
Answer: 12.2
.
|currency|2012|2011|2010|
|real|$ 40.4|$ 42.4|$ 32.5|
|euro|27.1|26.4|18.6|
|pound sterling|18.5|17.6|9.0|
|indian rupee|4.3|3.6|2.6|
|total impact|$ 90.3|$ 90.0|$ 62.7|
the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 41.94
notes to consolidated financial statements the following table sets forth the activity related to the 2005 restructuring plan liabilities . ( millions ) .
|balance at january 1 2005|$ 2014|
|expensed in 2005|141|
|cash payments in 2005|-23 ( 23 )|
|foreign currency revaluation|-2 ( 2 )|
|balance at december 31 2005|116|
|expensed in 2006|155|
|cash payments in 2006|-141 ( 141 )|
|foreign currency revaluation|4|
|balance at december 31 2006|134|
|expensed in 2007|38|
|cash payments in 2007|-110 ( 110 )|
|foreign currency revaluation|1|
|balance at december 31 2007|$ 63|
aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities are included in both accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position . aon corporation .

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?
Answer: 18
2022 base rate increases at entergy texas beginning may 2011 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case and effective july 2012 as a result of the puct 2019s order in the december 2011 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate cases . these increases were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2011 and at entergy gulf states louisiana effective september 2012 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan decreases . the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to decreased sales volume to municipal and co-op customers and lower prices . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased electricity usage , including the effect of milder weather as compared to the prior period on residential and commercial sales . hurricane isaac , which hit the utility 2019s service area in august 2012 , also contributed to the decrease in electricity usage . billed electricity usage decreased a total of 1684 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , across all customer classes . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2012 because entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana agreed to share the savings from an irs settlement related to the uncertain tax position regarding the hurricane katrina and hurricane rita louisiana act 55 financing with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the tax settlement . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2012 to 2011 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 2045|
|nuclear realized price changes|-194 ( 194 )|
|nuclear volume|-33 ( 33 )|
|other|36|
|2012 net revenue|$ 1854|
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by $ 191 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to lower pricing in its contracts to sell power and lower volume in its nuclear fleet resulting from more unplanned and refueling outage days in 2012 as compared to 2011 which was partially offset by the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements whereby entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running . amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below . partially offsetting the lower net revenue from the nuclear fleet was higher net revenue from the rhode island state energy center , which was acquired in december 2011 . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .

Question: what are the nuclear realized price changes as a percentage of the decrease in net revenue from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 101.57
compensation plan approved by security holders . the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans . the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5978 22.00 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a )|weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b )|number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|1211143|$ 308.10|5156223|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders|5978|22.00|2014|
|total|1217121||5156223|
item 13 . certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: what percentage of the outstanding options were from plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 99.51
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2014 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2009 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .
||12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|
|hum|$ 100|$ 125|$ 201|$ 160|$ 244|$ 342|
|s&p 500|$ 100|$ 115|$ 117|$ 136|$ 180|$ 205|
|peer group|$ 100|$ 112|$ 123|$ 144|$ 198|$ 252|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . table of contents .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 60.8
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .
||2009|2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|
|vornado realty trust|$ 100|$ 123|$ 118|$ 128|$ 147|$ 201|
|s&p 500 index|100|115|117|136|180|205|
|the nareit all equity index|100|128|139|166|171|218|
.

Question: what was the five year change in the vornado realty trust index?
Answer: 101
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .
||12/31/2007|12/31/2008|12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|
|ball corporation|$ 100.00|$ 93.28|$ 117.01|$ 155.14|$ 164.09|$ 207.62|
|dj us containers & packaging|$ 100.00|$ 61.55|$ 84.76|$ 97.78|$ 96.27|$ 107.76|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 61.51|$ 75.94|$ 85.65|$ 85.65|$ 97.13|
source : bloomberg l.p . aecharts .

Question: the five year total return for the period ending 12/31/2012 on ball corporation stock was how much greater than the same return on the s&p 500?
Answer: 110.49
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .
||12/31/2007|12/31/2008|12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|
|ball corporation|$ 100.00|$ 93.28|$ 117.01|$ 155.14|$ 164.09|$ 207.62|
|dj us containers & packaging|$ 100.00|$ 61.55|$ 84.76|$ 97.78|$ 96.27|$ 107.76|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 61.51|$ 75.94|$ 85.65|$ 85.65|$ 97.13|
source : bloomberg l.p . aecharts .

Question: the five year total return for the period ending 12/31/2012 on ball corporation stock was how much greater than the same return on the dj us containers & packaging index?
Answer: 99.86
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2012 , we repurchased 619314 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of approximately $ 46.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .
|period|total number of shares purchased ( 1 )|average price paid per share ( 2 )|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans orprograms|approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions )|
|october 2012|27524|$ 72.62|27524|$ 1300.1|
|november 2012|489390|$ 74.22|489390|$ 1263.7|
|december 2012|102400|$ 74.83|102400|$ 1256.1|
|total fourth quarter|619314|$ 74.25|619314|$ 1256.1|
( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in march 2011 ( the 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . ( 2 ) average price per share is calculated using the aggregate price , excluding commissions and fees . we continued to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2011 buyback subsequent to december 31 , 2012 . between january 1 , 2013 and january 21 , 2013 , we repurchased an additional 15790 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the 2011 buyback . as a result , as of january 21 , 2013 , we had repurchased a total of approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock under the 2011 buyback for an aggregate of $ 245.2 million , including commissions and fees . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 1.3 billion under the 2011 buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: what was the decimal proportion of the purchase in december 2012 to the purchase in january 2013
Answer: 6.49
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2007|12/31/2008|12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 80.20|$ 86.42|$ 112.60|$ 116.97|$ 121.46|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 63.00|$ 79.67|$ 91.68|$ 93.61|$ 108.59|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 78.58|$ 93.19|$ 118.14|$ 118.15|$ 127.07|
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ups from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 7.76
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .
||1/2/2010|1/1/2011|12/31/2011|12/29/2012|12/28/2013|1/3/2015|
|cadence design systems inc .|100.00|137.90|173.62|224.37|232.55|314.36|
|nasdaq composite|100.00|117.61|118.70|139.00|196.83|223.74|
|s&p 400 information technology|100.00|128.72|115.22|135.29|173.25|187.84|
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the rate of return in cadence design systems inc . of an investment from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 37.9