AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I have filed a dispute with for us bank with the CFPB already case # XXXX the reason I am filing another is because US Bank chose to respond to the fact that it was outside their allowed timeframe to dispute. they sent me a response to that effect to the first dispute. That however is not the reason I am filing a complaint here my issue was that us bank allowed me to open up a brand new fraud case with a brand new case # over a year later instead of telling me immediately that it was beyond the time frame to dispute. The customer service rep in the fraud dep. that I spoke to was aware of the timeframe between the account going neg and when I called them about re-opening the case. I asked if that would be a problem and was told no problem at all that they 'd just open a brand new case for me. I was not told at that time that I was beyond the time to file a case or would have moved forward with other options regarding my account to get a new reliable mode of transportation which is what I was trying to clear the account for if you read the previous complaint listed. instead I feel I was misled when they opened up a new investigation for me. I went thru all the motions and paperwork they required, I put my life on hold waiting for their response which caused additional financial hardship to me and my family. that is why there were XXXX case numbers sent with the original dispute. while waiting for them to respond my vehicle broke down costing me several hundred dollars. I would not have had the extra expense if I would have been dealt with honestly in the beginning. when I was finally given my denial months later it was for the old claim number, they did n't even refer to the new claim they started for me. I even requested a letter about the new claim number and a denial for that but never received XXXX. I believe I made that request in XXXX by phone to them. my understanding of the instructions received was that all documentation was required in a certain amount of days of the investigation being opened and receiving the fraud packet. When they opened up a new case for me I assumed I had 30 days from when I received the new fraud packet for the new case number. Does n't the fax that they opened a new case negate the old one? Do n't they have a responsibility to comply with their own rules based on the new case date? My time was wasted I ended up fixing a car I should not of had anymore and got stuch in a high interest loan by getting rushed into picking a car. I did not qualify for anything but in house financing because they did n't get my bank account fixed. please reference documents from the complaint listed XXXX I will not re-attach them to this one. Please respond the actual issue this time. The fact that I was made to jump through hoops on a case that your company had no intention of approving but never adv of this just told " no problem ma'am we 'll just start you an new case '' that is XXXX and when asked if I was expected to pay something I clearly did n't owe rep told me " sorry ma'am '' also XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I called the number on a letter I received XXXX/XXXX/15 dated XXXX/XXXX/15 confirming my on-line user name and the last XXXX digits of my ATM card number. It wanted me to confirm the information and tell me about the services. I contacted the number on the letter XXXX. Spoke to a XXXX in XXXX XXXX and asked what the letter meant. He stated they do n't send these type of letters out. I also ask him why they closed all the ATMs in XXXX and XXXX states. There are no branches either. I am unable to deposit money directly in my Citibank account. Now, I have to pay money for my another bank account XXXX XXXX or XXXX XXXX to transfer money into the Citibank account for my daughter who lives in XXXX XXXX. This gets costly for a person on Social Security XXXX and my husband is retired on Social Security too. Please tell me why they did this. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Terrible customer service, especially by XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX. 

Applied for pre-approval on a mortgage for a new house and cash-out refinancing on our existing house in order to fund the new property 's down payment. Citi 's feedback ( entirely reasonable ) was that we needed to show more assets sufficient to cover payments during the " double carry '' period when both loans would be in effect. Thus ensued over two months of discussions about how to meet the reserve requirement. Citi 's representatives were extremely slow to respond throughout the process. Once we finally came up with a structure that solved the reserve requirement problem -- again, after over two months of discussions -- Citi 's mortgage broker announced that our income was insufficient to qualify for both mortgages at once. ( Not insufficient for either loan, mind you. Just insufficient to qualify for the few months when both loans would be payable. ) She further had the gall to state that she had told me about their income guidelines from the start ; not one email in the first ten weeks says any such thing. 

Citi is entitled, of course, to create whatever underwriting guidelines they choose -- sensible or no. But it is a bit much to be led along for months on end like this. Citi had enough information about our income and borrowing request that they could have denied us within days or hours of receiving our application. Instead, they wasted our time haggling over a reserve requirement that ( according to what they now say ) could never have made a bit of difference from the start. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a bill from Macys that I am late on. The office sure collection department told me the XXXX due is a combination of XXXX ( the past due amount ), XXXX ( late fee ). Leaving XXXX unaccounted for. No one could tell me what the XXXX is for. When I got a supervisor when I asked for one - he supposedly put me on hold to find out and hung up on me. I want to know what the XXXX is for? 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have several accounts on my credit file that are reported inaccurately. I reached out to the credit reporting agencies and have n't seen any change or updated from my original disputes. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was sued with judgment from a collection agency Eichenbaum and Stylianou- XXXX XXXX. I did begin paying after receiving documents filed in XXXX and threats via phone by the company representative, XXXX XXXX XXXX that there would seize everything in my possession and be a lien and garnishments from my bank account and However, on XXXX XXXX, XXXX I received another letter from a different agency for the same collection. This peaked my curiosity. So, I then contacted the phone company which no longer had records of this bill from XXXX. I contacted E & S advising that I would cease payment that the phone company had no records of and that another agency was also trying to on for a different amount beacause I had felt that this had seem fraudulent. In XXXX, a judgment was entered for {$1700.00} for breach of contract. In which I was unemployed at the time. However, I was told that I still must submit a payment.. I contacted the courts and submitted a letter to the court and E & S advising of my employment status. 
In the past year XXXX E & S now changed to XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ) has contacted my relatives looking to collect this debt. My address has not changed. This debt is neither in my credit report nor in public record. A few days ago I received a letter for garnishment of wages. So, I contacted my local court whom advised that the docket has not changed since in over 6 years - yet their letter refers to the docket from when it was filed XXXX and updated in XXXX. So, I really do n't find their collection practice as being legal as 1- the phone company has not record of this. 2. Another collection agency was trying to collect on it. 3. Courts has no updated info regarding the suit nor of a garnishment. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I previously filed a complaint against ATG Credit for not willing to get a corrected amount for a loan they were collecting on. They responded to the complaint that they would find the correct amount and bill me appropriately. It has been 4 months and they still have n't contacted me. When I try to call them, they look up my account number and put me on hold for over a half an hour each time and no one ever picks up. I have even emailed them and receive no response. They believe I am not aware that there are XXXX separate loans but I am and have been paying towards them XXXX for several years. They are trying to charge me the initial amount that the loans were first taken out for and not the balance i owe now. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I ordered credit report on XX/XX/XXXX through my creditchecktotal.com. I noticed account appearing though XXXX XXXX XXXX with $ XXXX balance, apparently this account been open since XX/XX/XXXX. This account appeared out of no where, I never opened that account and it only appeared on my report in XX/XX/XXXX. I send a dispute with Experian, they told me they were able to verify this information though XXXX XXXX. I contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX they said that I do n't have this account through them, and they said call Experian. I called Experian and lady was very rude with me and told me that she would not do any additional investigation and I need to call the bank, I called the bank was on the phone with them for 2 hours and they ca n't find this account. I tried calling her again but she was rude again and said ca n't help me. This account is only being report to Experian. Even if it was my account, this account is over 7 years old and should not be appearing on my credit report. 

I have attached my credit report please review : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was affected by the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX College closure in XXXX 2015 (? ). I just received notice that my Federal loan has been approved to be discharged, but what about the private loan that they made me get through XXXX XXXX ( which the bills are now coming from University XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX for Campus Student Funding? How can I get that loan discharged? Or GREATLY reduced since I am now paying for something I have n't received ... an education ... a college degree. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Phoenix Financial Services is reporting a debt on my credit report for {$740.00}, I was not given notice of a debt collection until I recently pulled my credit report. 
They have also reported a different debt that I have been disputing for a long time with no resolution. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I was directed to this site to request a file disclosure from each nationwide credit bureaus and from nationwide specialty consumer reporting agencies. My files contain inaccurate information and I am exercising my right to this request. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was checking my credit and saw it decrease drastically and there was an account in collections claiming I took an ambulance to the hospital. I called and sent them a dispute after I was informed that was the thing to do. After a month passed, AFTER I 've mailed and faxed my dispute letter, Kansas Counselors , Inc are still stating they have n't received my dispute letter. I mailed and faxed the copy with the information they gave me. I 'm pretty much at a standstill on what to do. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have been out of work for most of XX/XX/XXXX due to moving, illness, and a car accident. I have received repeated calls from Sterling Jewelers/Kay Jewelers during this time in an attempt to collect a payment from me on an account for which I owe less than {$120.00}. I have tried to make the payments when they set them up but with no steady income I have been unable to follow through. They call up to 4-5 times a day, often from different numbers, in an attempt to make me answer the phone I assume. I have blocked XXXX numbers to date that I know belong to this company and yet they still call. They call late in the evening as well. They are sometimes rude and continually ask when I think I can pay and I 've told them I do n't know as I am trying to find a job every day! I just recently was given a position but it does n't start until XX/XX/XXXX and they still want to know when I can make a payment. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I bought a vehicle long time ago in XX/XX/XXXX I was almost payed off in XX/XX/XXXX until it was illegally towed away by a tow truck company, and my car was not repoed by current car company. The car was resold, and any debt incurred should be billed to towing company who stole the vehicle from me years ago. This was a loss to me, and my insurance company could not help me. Police was involved, and as the XXXX vet they just allowed it, and I had to get a lift from the cops just to get home way across town, and it was barely 30 days after I graduated from college where I was still on food stamps. This was a damage as well as a loss I am not responsible for. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have never had a account with a company called XXXX. I have told them this on many occasions and they continue to say that I owe this debt. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 'm showing on my credit report that I owe a balance to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, but I never had phone service with this company. I do n't recall them notifying me about this situation. There is also no evidence to prove that I had service with this company. No billing statements or anything. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: We cancelled home Internet services with XXXX XXXX XXXX when we moved. We went into the store closest to our home, returned our equipment, and paid our final bill in full. We have the receipt for this transaction and we were told at the store that we were " good to go. '' XXXX XXXX XXXX reported us to a debt collection agency for non-returned equipment one month later. We received absolutely no notice that this would occur, even though the company has our mail forwarding, current phone number, and email. The first information we received was from the debt collector notifying us that we had been sent to a collection agency. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Just got another call from a " XXXX XXXX '' from an UNAVAILABLE phone #, who said he was a XXXX XXXX Process Server trying to let me know he was coming to my work and/or my home to serve me a subpoena. He said the party that wants me in court is EZCorp and to call them at XXXX to stop it. I told him I had never heard of someone getting a heads up call for a subpoena and asked if he actually worked XXXX and he said yes. Well, I called the # and got a " XXXX XXXX '' with verification who said this was for a lawsuit from a loan they say I got on XXXX XXXX, 2010 ( I did not get XXXX then, possibly a year to 6 months before but I know for sure I did not get XXXX during that time or since that time. Either way they said they were in contact with a list of people as references, My father, my brother, to name a few, to get this handled and have been unsuccessful. I was transferred to a female named XXXX and then back over to a XXXX. He was giving me my person information including last XXXX of social and my entire drivers license #. I told him I did n't recognize EZCorp as a loan, and especially on that date. And he tried to say I was lying because someone went in there with my ID and got the loan and now I supposedly owe thousands and they are going to have my drivers license suspended and he repeated my actual drivers license # off to me. I told him I did n't think they were legit and I was not paying for something I did n't sign up for. He said he would see me in court so I hung up. I did n't even think to tell him that the State of Texas statue of limitations on debt is 4 years, which this would be past then for sure. This is n't the first time I have heard of this from EZCorp people telling me this and I keep telling them to send me proof and they tell me to quit playing games and that they know what " I did ''. Even still, I google searched this found the CFPB reached a settlement with them for saying these same types of statements. I would have thought with the settlement, they would stop but it is still continuing. I also was n't contacted to sign up on the plaintiffs with CFPB so why would this EZCorp still be contacting me? 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: our XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX XXXX and our XXXX XXXX payments to Ditech servicing have cleared our bank. Ditech claims to not have received them. The payments were made electronically through our bank 's bill pay. XXXX XXXX, i first notified Ditech of XXXX and XXXX missing payments. despite repeated communiques, I have received nothing from Ditech regarding missing payments. I charge them with theft. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Experian deceptively led me to give my CC for charging to me credit report. They did not give any information on the service they are providing and how and which number to call to cancel, or that they have charged my CC. Their WWW deceptively gives information forcing you to give your CC as if it is required to give you the credit report and then without notice they charge your CC, Request made to cancel the service is very aggressive. Calls are dropped, that 's what happened to me and they refused to refund me later call, when I saw the charge on my checking account, 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I think someone in family used my identity to create this false account.. I have no knowledge of this account and, or agreement.. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: CashNetUSA is charging late fees and noting my account as delinquent, but they are not debiting my checking account on the dates agreed upon. Since CashNet has not abided by the contract by not debiting my account as agreed, and as a result are adding interest to my loan and causing and declaring my loan is in default, I am requesting the account closed with a final payment of {$210.00}. They can not say I am in default 73 days when they do not perform the automatic debit as contracted. I took out the loan for travel to XXXX funerals in XXXX 2015 and relied on the terms of the contract to withdraw the agreed upon amount. What they are attempting to do now is steal money and tarnish my credit rating in the form of fees and a default notice. There is a deposit of over {$3000.00} on the XXXX and last day of each month, so CashNet has no grounds for late fees or default notices. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I have a credit card through Wells Fargo Bank. I reached my limit and came to a payment agreement with them that I would no longer be able to charge on my card. They are taking automatic deductions from my checking account. However, once they started doing that they stopped sending me statements in the mail. I tried opening an online account so I can keep track of the account and the site would not allow me to do so. I called them to ask them to help me set up an online account and they told me that because the account was " over charged '' and had been closed, that they would no longer provide me with or allow me to open an online account. The only way they offered for me to follow the progress of my payments was to call them monthly and they would tell me what my balance is. Can they take money from me without giving me a written method of following the account? For all I know, the money could be going to another account or being put into someone 's personal account. I want to be able to open an online account so I can check on the balance and make sure my money is being applied to my account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Back in 2012 I voluntarily surrendered my vehicle. There was a remaining balance on the loan, which then got sent to collections. Since 2012 I have moved twice, and never received anything from the collections agency National Recovery Agency. I called them from from the number that was on my credit report, asking if they could please mail me something to verify my debt and balance that I owed. They said they mailed something back in 2012 and they did not have to send anything again. I told them that I never received anything, and asked again if they could send me something. She said they were not a billing company and since they already sent something in 2012 whether I received it or not - and my address did change- they would not send anything else. She also said that if I made payments on my debt they do not send a receipt or updated statement. How am I supposed to pay on a debt when collections agency practice like this? How am I supposed to pay when I am unsure of the amount, and if they are applying my payments to my account? 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I moved in 2014 & changed health insurance plans, was not forwarded or contacted by company about debt & have not been given any verification regarding debts I was informed insurance had covered 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: This company sent me a credit refund balance from a credit i had on my Barclay credit card in the amount of {$360.00} on XXXX/XXXX/2016. When i received the check i called the number back on my card to make sure it was okay to cash it and the representative said she did n't see any stop payment on it so it was okay to cash it. So i mobile deposited into my XXXX XXXX account and the check came back unpaid and put my bank account in the negative which caused all types of problems and emotional distress. This is considered writing a hot check which is a crime and a felony no matter who you are. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citi has a robo caller that calls my home number XXXX times per day. Trying to collect from someone that has n't lived here in over 5 years. 
The robo caller has no option for me to inform them that they are calling the wrong number. 
This occured two months ago, and I contacted a manager at Citi customer service and informed them that the person they were looking for does not live here. The manager informed me that they would stop calling. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response