AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I obtain services from XXXX a while I cancel the service because the services was not what I thought it would be. So I contact the company and the request me return the equipment becuase this equipment was self install by and they did offer installation. So we I was remove the equipment such censor and things I sent them the wrong item. So contact me and informed via mail and phone that I submitted the wrong equipment. So I final figure out the right equipment and return it to XXXX. On Friday, XXXX XXXX, 2015 I contact XXXX to confirm the receipt of there equipment. I spoke with XXXX who inform me that they receive the equipment and had process a refund. I ask the what account number or card number the credit was apply to because I made severall change far has banking and they might trace or put stop payment on the refund. So I aslo provide the credit card number and XXXX to apply the payment to my current card. On Monday, XXXX XXXX, 2015 I received a call from XXXX stating that I will not be receiving my refund becuase it has been apply to close bank account or credit card. Please explain how can a credit be apply to closed bank account and credit card. Then later I was contact be Staf trying to explain the situation that did not make any sense to me. How can refunds be apply to close bank account and bank card. Please review the Banking ( charges ) for XXXX and the account they said was refunding the money to I do not have the card order information anymore. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citi mortgage had a modification package as of XXXX see attachment. 
The sale date was set for XXXX. Never once did Citi reach out stating information was needed/missing. Our office has called in for the last 3 weeks. NO ONE contacted the homeowner regarding missing documents. 
There has been a consistent issue with authorization even though XXXX was sent XXXX and XXXX verbals good for 6 months were issued by the homeowner. 
Friday XXXX XXXX failed to mention documents were needed. 
XXXX supervisor XXXX XXXX reviewed the file and stated we should have been made aware info was needed. 
The XXXX never contacted our office until XXXX even though previous emails were sent to him. On XXXX he emailed and stated the sale date for XXXX would not be postponed as it is to close to the sale date. The file HAD BEEN WITH THE UNDERWRITER. Please see attached email. 
It is very apparent CITI has neglected this file. The employees are very incompetent as well as negligent. We are DEMANDING that the sale date be postponed so the file can be properly reviewed 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I recently found out my credit file was not only incorrect but was a duplicate going back over 7 years. It also has an incorrect amount and this still has not been corrected. It seems they do n't care. XXXX have it right but not Experian! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I recently made XXXX minor debit card purchases which brought the balance in my checking account to a negative status. At the time that I checked the account online there were no fees assessed, so I withdrew the necessary funds from my savings account to bring the checking account to a positive status. 

Two days after I made the transfer, they still applied the {$35.00} fee to each purchase - bringing the total in fees to {$140.00}. After discovering the fees, I then called the bank about it. At that point they reduced the fees to {$26.00} for each transaction, which they referred to as a partial reversal. 

My issue with the matter is that If I made a transfer ( from an account with the same institution ) which brought the status of the account to a positive status - BEFORE they assessed the overdraft fees - why should I have to pay any fees? 

Any help in clarifying this matter for me would be greatly appreciated. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I did not receive any communication of this debt and if it was a true debt, did not receive the opportunity to resolve the matter. I never once receive a letter/bill to reflect what this is for. I only found out as it was reported on my credit report as a 'collection '' on XXXX XXXX. When I called FBCS on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I was told it was for services provided on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. I called XXXX, which was my insurance provider at the time, and they do not show any claims submitted for that date or even for a range that they searched for. I asked FBCS to send me 'proof ' to see what this medical bill was for and they have not sent me anything and keep telling to just pay off the account without justifying the charges. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Today I was informed by CitiMortgage which is my mortgage co. that once again I have been denied a loan modification. My acct # is XXXX. I reside at XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, NJ XXXX. My initial application was in XXXX, the mortgage co. at that time lead me on for more than a year and a half with the hopes of an approval, there were numerous correspondences only for the big let down, now here come the foreclosure letters. threats from their lawyers, in and out of court to stop lockouts. CitiMortgage told me in order to get in good standards with them that I would have to give them at that time excessive amount of {$31000.00} plus. I reached out to a grp. called XXXX, who has been nothing but professional in every way. XXXX submitted a file with the mortgage co. on XXXX XXXX, XXXX and in that time alone CitiMortgage has tried to put the foreclosure in effect at least once each month. CitiMortgage says that I have been denied again due to no change in my income, which is not true in XXXX I became a Commissioner with the City of XXXX which comes with a stipend paid in quarters, although I have not received a raise in 9 yrs. I do not believe that the CitiMortgage is doing an actual review there are so many inconsistencies ... .I am in need of some help ... .this is a family home .... 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Someone from XXXX XXXX ( SLS ) was breaking into my property and was aggressively threatening a tenant on the premises that they were there to remove all of the personal property. She was frightened and stressed to tears. SLS was obviously attempting to illegally confiscate the property, with a secondary goal to terrorize ( rude, threatening, yelling untrue statements, showing false documents, etc. ) the tenants to prematurely terminate their lease. Their ultimate goal is to avoid mediation and fair negotiation of the purchased debt. Only my contacting the Dept of Justice and the property 's escrow attorney stopped their action. Contact by the the aforementioned attorneys caused the SLS attorney to write a disingenuous denial of knowledge of hiring the " henchmen ''. This illegal flexing of muscle was purposefully executed 1 day before a scheduled mediation date for a loan modification. Thank goodness a neighbor questioned the " thieving henchman '' before they gained entry or changed locks. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Credit Solutions Corp did a hard inquiry on my credit report for a debt no longer valid, and also sent a letter stating i still owe the amount. 
I received a XXXX for the debt in 2013. Which was included on my taxes. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Capital Management Services contacted my sister about me and she has no knowledge of my finances. She is not listed on any current outstanding credit I have. She should not have been contacted. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: i have several medical bills from XXXX iowa they did not file with my insurance company properly or not at all i have contacted my insuranse company and they have not recieved any charges that is on my credit report they can not pay what they have not been given i went to them and asked and they told me they did submit it i asked them to resubmit it and they told me they could not also i swear under oath i have never in my life time received a bill for the charges that i see on my credit report from them also they are charging me for an ambulance that i never was transported in and charges in XXXX of 2012 or XXXX the patient was my mother and no charges were ever submitted to either insurance company and again i have never been sent a bill for either i have charges from years ago but in no way knew about them until i looked at my credit report for the first time this year 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: They do not update my information/have incorrect information on me and I can not correct it, I can not log in due to the security questions not being correct 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was working with my prior servicer XXXX XXXX XXXX to remove the PMI on my home. I was told to get an appraisal on the property, by the time I received the appraisal I received notification that my loan had been transferred to a new servicer " SLS ''. I contacted SLS to advise them I just received the appraisal and would like to request the removal of the PMI. I was advised to submit a request with my signature along with a copy of the appraisal. After submitting the documents, I received a letter stating they would not be able to use that appraisal and that I would have to pay for an additional appraisal ( an additional {$400.00} ). Also, the letter stated there was an authorization form attached that I would have to sign and send back for them to begin the process of obtaining a new appraisal. To my surprise there was no authorization form so I called SLS and they said I would receive a new authorization form. Three weeks later I am still waiting. I contacted my prior servicer and was told since my appraisal is not 60 days old SLS should be able to use it. At this point I think this is a stall tactic on the part of SLS. Either use my appraisal or provide me with a form so I can request one from your company. Every time I call SLS I get a different explanation. I 'm so frustrated and feel this is deliberate so that the customer will continue to pay the PMI. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Initially I disputed items on my credit report, which came back as verified. I believe the investigation is questionable. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I paid my mortgage on time. I actually paid them extra money by check. When I went to my bank they had drafted extra money from my account without my authorization. This is the second time they have done this. A few months ago I paid {$850.00} cash money to them. The next week I had checks bouncing all over the place because they kept the cash AND took another {$850.00} from my personal bank. How do they do that? I did n't authorize my bank or them to take ANY money from my personal bank. This is affecting my reputation and my creditworthiness. In fact it is damaging to my reputation in the community. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On the morning of XXXX XXXX, 2016, we received a call from Synchony Bank about a delinquent Sam 's account. According to my wife, there have been multiple calls including concerning dialogs on " sending the police out to your house ''. With verification of the last XXXX of my SSN and address it was determined that it was not my account and that they made a mistake. I then requested to talk to a supervisor " XXXX '' who said that the company made a mistake. 

My concern, it that my family and myself were harassed based on only my name. These types of call should not be allowed based on limited searches with just the name. I understand the need to collect on bad debt, but I believe that his company and Sam 's should be held accountable for these types of collections practices. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Unauthorized credit cards listed on my credit report that I did not authorize while also pulling my credit report. My personal and private information was pulled on XXXX XXXX, XXXX by XXXX XXXX XXXX in California which was deemed impermissible. My personal and private information was also stated in audio copyrighted in XXXX XXXX that is now public knowledge ( ref # XXXX ) Since this person responsible for obtaining my social security number had XXXX pull my information, I have had attempts of people trying to use my social security number to open accounts in my name. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank does n't want to return my ach deposit on a closed account. I met with a banker named XXXX XXXX that put a return of funds. Wells Fargo Bank failed to make such easy task. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I received a message from a XXXX XXXX XXXX from a " Plaintiff 's office '' regarding a case against me and I would be getting served a summons in the next two days. I received messages from two friends of the same message. I called the number right away and spoke with a XXXX XXXX. He said that he was a law firm preparing a lawsuit against me for a payday loan and due to the statute of limitations the creditor is taking legal action against me now before it runs out. It said it was over {$700.00} I owed plus attorney fees and costs. But if I agreed to pay today, they could work out a payment agreement. He stated he was representing XXXX XXXX XXXX. He provided my last XXXX of my social security number and information regarding the debt such from its original company. I agreed to pay the amount I believed this must be legitimate since he called my two friends and knew the original debt information and I did n't want a summons of a lawsuit against me. After I provided my information I asked for his company 's info. He stated he is with a company called XXXX which is a law office in XXXX, Texas XXXX. I asked for his direct number and he provided XXXX. He said he would be sending me a receipt by the end of business day. After the call, I felt like something seemed wrong because I felt as though they were pushing me into resolving this by threatening legal actions against me. So I called back and explained my concerns. He stated he would send me the receipt right away. I received the receipt in my email and it was very vague with limited information and the company was totally different from the company he told me he was with. I called the number on the receipt and a man answered. I asked what kind of company he was and he said it was for mediation services. Then he asked me directly if it was me calling. I said yes and he transferred me back to XXXX XXXX. I have since checked my credit report and this payday loan with XXXX is not listed on XXXX, XXXX or XXXX. Everything on my credit report is current because I have disputed incorrect charges that appeared recently. This company used scare tactics and possible legal action against me to get me to pay a debt that is past the statute of limitations and possibly may not even be assigned to me. From my research, I have determined under the Fair Debt and Collection Protections that threatening legal action is illegal and a company is not allowed under the law to take these actions. Thank you in advance for all help and guidance with this complaint. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: All XXXX reporting agency 's are reporting incorrect information on my credit report and have caused me to loss jobs, etc. The following are the XXXX report numbers that I disputed with them : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX. I have a XXXX on my credit report and it is not my account. I was at XXXX time an authorize user on this account and have asked to be removed from this account. All three reporting agency 's are reporting this account as my account when by law I have no ties to this account. I contacted XXXX and they said I was only an authorize user at XXXX time and asked them to remove me. I also asked all XXXX credit agencys to remove me and they will not remove this account. I am attaching my recorded statement that I took of my conversation with XXXX and what they said that I am not the owner of the account at all. I need your help in getting this account removed from all three reporting agency 's. The XXXX account # XXXX Please assist me in this investigation as the XXXX agency 's will not correct this information and delete this account. This is my last chance to try to get this corrected before hiring an attorney. 

If you could assist me I would appreciate it. 

Warm Regards, XXXX XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX VA XXXX SS # XXXX DOB XX/XX/XXXX Bank of America HAS AGREED TO REMOVE INQUIRY FROM MY XXXX REPORT. 
DELETE bank of America INQUIREY FROM MY REPORT DRIVERS ID AND UTILITY BILL AND SS CARD IS ATTACHED DO NOT SAY YOU DO N'T HAVE MY ID 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have had a CitiAadvantage card for years with Citibank. On XXXX I was told the bank declined my card. They have made no attempt to contact me, and when I check my account online it still shows that it 's open, and current with no overdue balance. I have tried repeatedly to call Citicard customer service to find out why, but they say they can tell me nothing. After several tries to reach upper supervisors ( and being hung up on once ) I was told it was " a security issue '' and that the only way to get a response was to mail them a letter and wait for a response. If there are security issues with my account or credit, I need to know in real time. Apparently there is an " executive response unit '' from which this information is mailed, but there is no way to reach them except by snail mail. The company 's refusal to provide me any information is unacceptable, and puts both my financial security & credit at risk. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I tried to pay off my Citi credit card in XXXX and got a check from my credit union to pay off the balance. I sent in the check with the payment coupon on XXXX/XXXX/2016. I checked a few days later and I still had a balance. I waited a few more days and checked back, still no payoff. I called and was told it would take 7 - 10 days to post, to call back then. I kept checking and nothing. Finally near the end of XXXX I called the credit union to put a stop on the check and was told it was cashed by Citi on XXXX/XXXX/16. I called and emailed a dozen times and still got nowhere. I sent a copy of the cancelled check and was told it would take 30 days to research. Finally the check was located on XXXX/XXXX/16 and kept checking to see if it was posted. I called last night and was told it would take 30 days to post to the account. That is 60 days from the date I sent the payoff check. In the mean time I am accruing interest and having to make payments to stay current while the " find '' my lost check. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The week of XXXX XXXX, 2016 I made a call to CitiCard Customer Service to proactively call and let them know my credit card payment was going to be late for the month of XXXX because I had transitioned into a new job and was waiting for my first paycheck. I requested for the customer service rep. to provide assistance with a forbearance, due date change, or forgiveness due to my situation. The customer service rep. assured me that I would have nothing to worry about, thanked me for my due diligence of calling in to let them know my payment was going to be late and that if I were to receive a late charge I should call back in to request for the XXXX late charge to be removed. This evening, XXXX XXXX, I called to request for my XXXX late charge to be removed, explained my hardship again and explained I will not be late going forward and I was told that my payment was late due to my own error and not a bank related error they would not be able to assist me. I find this unbelievable that a company would treat their customer in this way. I could have just avoided them for a couple of weeks until the payment was withdrawn from my account, but I did n't. I gave them notice that I was having a small and temporary hardship and I feel like they took advantage of me. They basically assured me that my account would be okay and mislead me to get me off the phone and on to the next customer call. Due to this, knowing the risk involved I closed my account immediately further damaging my credit, all because this bank wanted to take advantage of my situation. The sad thing is I know I am probably not the only person who tried to do the right thing and be proactive, but for what? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian is the only company of the XXXX that require supporting documentation such as drivers licenses, utility bill copies etc to be filed with them to establish or renew a 90 day fraud alert. If XXXX and and XXXX can accomplish all that online why not Experian? Their requirements could easily lead XXXX to believe they are attempting to make the process difficult as possible with the hope that consumers will just abandon placing an alert. Alerts, to my understanding, if filed with XXXX company are to be shared with the remaining XXXX agencies but that does n't always happen. Why ca n't the process be, made easier ( this is not concerning myself so much as other filers in the household )? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Last month, my credit score was XXXX. Today, the Experian Credit Monitoring Service notes that my credit score was downgraded by XXXX to XXXX! More concerning, ( 1 ) I have not applied for new credit, ( 2 ) I have not been late on my payments within the past 24 months, ( 3 ) No accounts have been closed, ( 4 ) I have not used my credit cards in since XXXX 2015, and ( 5 ) no credit inquiries last month. 

I would like the credit bureaus to explain why my credit score dropped. I am currently paying $ XXXX/month to monitor my credit because I want to improve my credit worthiness. As a customer, I should be entitled to know why my credit score dropped because it is not showing up on my credit reports. Please advise. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response