AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: We are serious company who makes {$700000.00} gross revenue with a constant positive business account of {$20000.00} to {$30000.00}. We have since XXXX XX/XX/XXXX a business account with the XXXX XXXX former XXXX XXXX XXXX. In XXXX XXXX we received a credit card with a {$5000.00} credit line. 
On the XX/XX/XXXX statement XX/XX/XXXX appears a Balance due of XXXX. 
An automatic payment was previously installed. 
In XXXX XXXX the Credit department of the XXXX XXXX failed to consider our first automatic set up payment and registered an incident. Thus they decreased our limit to XXXX dollars. 
In XXXX XXXX. That was the first damage. 
We called and asked them to solve this issue and come back to the initial XXXX dollars approved limit. 
In fact this call was assimilated as a request for a credit line increase. 
We were surprised to be informed on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX that our request was denied and registered as well in the credit score history. 
A second call produced exactly the same effects and on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX we received a second letter with the same denial of approval on a credit line increase. As a result our Credit score went from XXXX to XXXX. 
On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX we made a payment of {$2800.00} for a due date of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. When we looked up on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX if the payment which was withdrawn of our account on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX was registered in the payment history it did not show up. Again we paid {$2800.00} on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX as it did n't show registered. The same day we paid {$2900.00}. So for we had a credit on our account but the XXXX XXXX refused payments to our suppliers. 
As we tried to explain for a third time to a supervisor the recurrent problems and can not find a positive solution to our matter, we would like you to intervene. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been working for over 2 days to speak to someone who can help resolve an issue. I have been told several times that the procedure to so have someone call me back. So far no one has ever called back, when I call I am just told that the procedure is to put in for a call back and we go through the same drill again. I am concerned about the lack of resources to escalate any issues. The issue stems from being given incorrect information from a customer service rep. At this point I have lost complete trust in them to give correct information, or to return a phone call. We are going on 72 hours with this at this point. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Was not notified of a debt owed before placed into collections. They did not send back up documentation of debt owed. Excessive monthly charges, extortion to intimidate if do not settle credit will continue to be damaged and I will not be able to buy a home. If I do pay in full, it will still remain on credit report and lender will not let me buy a home. That it is better to wait the 7 years. They harass me, are rude, degrading in telling me I should of read the lease. That I can call a lawyer but there is still nothing I can do. This is detrimental to me and my family. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: have been trying for over a month to get a 5 yrs payment history, finally received one last week but XXXX was for some other person. I have talked to supervisors but because of my bankruptcy in XXXX they give me to another dept and sy it will be 10 to 20 days but nothing happens. This week they said a fax was sent to my place I am trying to refinance with, to get some info and when I ask my rep they never received anything. Now I am in danger of loosing my locked in loan rate. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a home equity line of credit with Citibank that has principal and interest in the monthly payment. This account is current. Last month, there was a system error showing an overstated principal amount. I contacted Citibank on XXXX XXXX, XXXX regarding this matter and spoke with a supervisor, XXXX, who agreed there was an error and told me it would be resolved the next day. 
I called two days later and the error was corrected but upon checking one week later, the error was back in the system. I then spoke to a manager, XXXX, ID XXXX, on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, who said they were still working on the issue. I was told the issue would self correct in the following month. 
This is not an acceptable business practice. The error was then corrected in the system when I checked on XXXX XXXX. 
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I checked the system and the principal balance amount is again incorrect. Also, same day, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I received a notice from Citibank dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX that my account is in default and that there will be a property inspection scheduled that I will be billed for as a delinquency expense. 
My account is current and paid. I am appealing to the CFPB to contact Citibank and have this matter rectified. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: It was a loan taken for my daughter to attend XXXX College of XXXX XXXX, in XXXX XXXX, Mn and I co-signed the loan for her. In XXXX my husband and I filed bankruptcy due to a preditory lender situation and this loan was in the the Chapter XXXX filing. United Guaranty owned the loan and filed XXXX claims against us against our Chapter XXXX filing and received payment through our Trustee. United Guaranty had purchased this loan from XXXX XX/XX/XXXX when our Bankruptcy was filed. The Bankruptcy was discharged XX/XX/XXXX. On approximately XXXX/XXXX/XXXX we received letters from XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXXstating that they had a debt we owed and it was being sent to collections on a delinquent account we had never received any information or bill on, and had no knowledge of owing. After reviewing our bankruptcy it appears as though they had been paid through the court by claims they had made against us when our bankruptcy was filed. I ( XXXX ) made copies of the claims made and the discharge paperwork and sent it to both XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX Firm. XX/XX/XXXX a processor came to our home intending to serve our daughter with papers regarding a judgement against her and we explained the situation to him and that our daughter did not reside with us and we had not had contact with her for seven months. He advised I ( XXXX XXXX ) call the law firm he was representing and explain what I had told him. I did that the next day and was told by XXXX ( representing the law firm ) that they had our lawyers name and he asked me if the name they had was correct which it was and that they would not talk to me they would take care of everything necessary through our lawyer and that was the end of the conversation. I ( XXXX ) made copies of all the documents regarding the claims filed by United, copies of our bankruptcy, and the dismissal document and brought them to the law office of XXXX Law Firm on XXXX XXXX, XXXX again stating that XXXX XXXX does not live here. We have now received documents that there is a motion filed and I must appear in court. To the best of our knowledge they have received their claim amount and the bankruptcy is closed. United Guaranty did not file any further claim when asked by the court to do so before the final discharge was approved. They continue to hassle us and have continually threatened us with judgments and to make false statements regarding our credit to creditors. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I signed up for this dating service, XXXX XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/2012. The representative of this company did a bait and switch of their dating services. I specifically told the woman that I DO NOT want a blind dating service. She told me that I would be able to see a photo before hand. She also did not give me a copy of the contract until after the three day rights of recission expired. I also was an emotional wreck when I came into the office and signed it under duress. Afterwards, she told me that I can do a different plan to see the candidates but it would cost me an additional {$10000.00}. 
Now a collection company called Advanced Capital Solutions is hounding me for further payment. As far as I am concerned, they should issue me a full refund for the money that I already paid. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Regarding XXXX CS Number XXXX Previously, I contacted XXXX to verify the return of the company 's equipment. 
I am disputing the total amount of {$330.00} debt or any portion requested by First National Collection Bureau , Inc., XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX and contact number XXXX. I returned all equipment on XXXX XXXX, 2015, to a XXXX Installation Technician. The Technician was installing cable network for my niece XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX. The Technician informed me that he would turn in the equipment promptly. Therefore, I trusted the Technician ethical and moral since XXXX hirer responsible employees for providing excellent customer service. 
Therefore, I should n't be charged or harassed for funds on my account. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have an auto loan with Regional Acceptance Corporation that I opened in XXXX. I have been paying on this loan for more than 5 years giving them almost XXXX a month. The loan amount was {$16000.00} and they are telling me because of interest and late fees that I still owe them over {$10000.00}. As of last month, I have paid them a total of about {$22000.00}, so they are telling me that I have given them {$16000.00} in late fees and interest. When I purchased this car I felt like I was being pressured and plowed down by XXXX people in an office at XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX FL and they found this finance company for me. I am scared they are going to reposses my car which by the way was not even new it was a XXXX when I bought it and only worth about {$12000.00}. I have been struggling to pay for this car since the beginning and I have been taken advantage of to the extreme. I do n't want this on my credit so I continue to pay for it. I feel like I was open prey and that this is very very unfair practice. They have no reason to continue making me pay for this car. They already got the entire sum plus more! Please someone help me. Thank you. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I lost my job at the end of XXXX. On XXXX XXXX, we requested a Loan Modification from XXXX XXXX XXXX, filed all the requested paperwork, more that one time, I might add. Delays and more delays and nothing happened. Finally, in XXXX XXXX, we had a meeting in person, with a XXXX Rep. and started another request for XXXX, kept in touch with her for a couple of months, emailed her often to check status, advised her in XXXX XXXX that I had found a good job and we felt confident to resume payments. We stressed very often that we wanted and would do anything to keep our home, just tell us what to do, to no avail. 
Then the loan went to XXXX XXXX, then to Select Portfolio Services, and of course every time, a new XXXX request, more paperwork, and it dragged and dragged. Of course as time goes by, interest and late fees keep accumulating, what was a XXXX balance, got to XXXX, we still wanted our home, but finally in XXXX of XXXX, almost 4 years later, the only thing left for us to do was a Short Sale or Deed in Lieu, really? after 4 years? 
At what point we had control of the time all this show took place? We could n't abandon the house, we could n't make payments because no agreement had been made, we would 've lost that as well. 
Only thing for us to do was to maintain the property, and we did, even though we did n't live in it full time because of our jobs in another town. 
The house was merely to spend 4-6 days a month while being off work, and served as storage for our furniture. My wife and I still live with relatives because our credit is shot and because guidelines wont let us buy a house for 3 to 7 years. 
XXXX XXXX sold the house 2-3 months after we moved out. We lost our home of 8 years, down payment, closing costs, improvements, not to mention the stress and the uncertainty of the outcome, alongside with the credit consequences that now wont let us even attempt to apply for a mortgage anywhere else. 
A deal is a deal. It was very unfortunate that I lost my job and I expected consequences, like missed payments I had to make up for, late fees, penalties, interest, etc ... and we were ready to comply with that, that would 've been easier, but they kept pushing for a Loan Modification, we did n't wanted one after XXXX XXXX, but they always had control and their plan was to build up the debt, make the house go underwater and forced us out, and it worked. We lost our home and ca n't buy another because our credit shows a Deed in Lieu and no mortgage company wants part of us. Guidelines, they say, you have to wait. 
Have n't we lost enough already? 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I originally was contacted via phone by a payday loan office calling for an XXXX? I figured they would get the hint when they called my voice mail the message says XXXX, NOT XXXX, that they would figure out they have a wrong number. Now I have a collection agency calling me at least once a month. I never went to or took out any loans with any payday or quick cash establishments. XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I accepted Suntrust bank overdraft protection after reading their disclosure statement and what I needed to know about overdrafts and overdraft protection. In their statement it says : " An overdraft occurs when you do not have enough money in your account to cover a transaction, but the bank pays it as a courtesy. Suntrust can cover your overdrafts in two different ways '' : 1. We have standard overdraft practices that come with your account 2. They offer overdraft protection plans. 
It continues : " You will incur a fee of up to {$36.00} each time an overdraft is paid. '' On XXXX/XXXX/2015 my available balance was XXXX and my balance was XXXX. Since XXXX was the last business day until XXXX/XXXX/2015 all transactions made by me with my debit card would show as pending. My total charges from XXXX/XXXX/2015 thru XXXX/XXXX/2015 totaled XXXX against a balance in my account of XXXX. On the morning of XXXX/XXXX/2015 I received an e-mail from Suntrust informing me I had an available balance of XXXX. So all charges showing pending throughout the Holiday week-end would be paid with funds showing in balance of XXXX. Therefore none of those charges should have been charged an overdraft fee. 
Then at XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/2015 I was left without options and if not paid the utilities were due to be cutoff first thing Tuesday morning XXXX/XXXX/2015, so I used my debit card online and paid the utility bill. Well rather than doing what I have been told by several Suntrust employees a pending transaction amount is deducted from available funds so to pay transaction when presented by merchant. That 's not was done. They treated all transactions that were pending as if they came after the XXXX utility charge thus overdrawing the acoount and charging XXXX overdraft charges. There was never an overdrawn acccount. All charges authorized by me before XXXX were done with the available funds. Furthermore based on Suntrust documentation there was never an item presented without sufficient funds. I had the original XXXX available and when the XXXX was presented for payment on XXXX my direct deposit had posited. 
I feel Suntrust is very deceptive in its business practices. They do not adhere to their own disclosures. As a consumer how can you do business when they control your money and once seized by them it is impossible to have returned 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: SPS has insisted XXXX in their response to my last complaint and in correspondence that XXXX XXXX does not allow loan modifications. However, when SPS sends me forms to fill out, they use forms that are copies of the government forms used to evaluate individuals for loan modifications. Secondly, SPS states very clearly that they participate in XXXX and XXXX programs. This contradicts their prior statement directly and means that they have been wasting my time. XXXX and I qualify for Loan Modification based upon her XXXX and our subsequent loss of income. I have supplied paperwork to illustrate this fact. I will submit a complaint against XXXX XXXX separately. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Received a demand letter FOR payment on a mortgage debt that was clearly DISCHARGED IN MY BANKRUPTCY FILING XX/XX/2014.tHIS IS OUTRAGEOUS THAT CitiMORTGAGE IS ALLOWED TO DO THIS WHICH IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF A 93 A AND AGAINST THE LAW, 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Credit Karma has XXXX open accounts for XXXX.They have both been discharged in a bankruptcy therefore they are closed.I tried 3 times to get them to fix this they have not. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX is reporting XXXX open accounts that are discharged through a bankruptcy i have been trying to resolve this but XXXX XXXX insists that this is the information they are receiving from trans union. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In complaint # XXXX and others I proved what Select Portfolio and XXXX XXXX call a modification was actually a cash out refinance loan, and I was never given any RESPA documents showing where the funds were dispersed and never given a 3 day right of rescission as per required by Federal law. 
This cash out refinance was done on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, which would be the day that my right to rescind would start. 
SPS has finally quit trying to deny paying off any other loans ( XXXX actually paid off my then first mortgage with XXXX Mortgage, without my knowledge or permission, but they are trying to claim that my right of rescission was effective from XXXX when I took out my original loan, which was with XXXX. 
How they can assert this is beyond me, because the cash out refinance of my XXXX loan was done on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, not XXXX. 
I rescinded the loan in XXXX XXXX, which is well within the 3 year right of rescission that SPS admits exists. Therefore, I again demand that my loan be rescinded. I also demand that the CFPB take enforcement action against these RESPA violations. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My wife bought a car at XXXX.they got her financed through condor capitol.they have taken payments sometimes twice a month .the when you try to get them to put it back in her account its a hassle.we have paid bank fees numerous to Times.payments were may that were not credited to her account.they closed her online account so she ca n't view it to see if payments are coming off balance.they say they did it because her car is almost paid off.they wo n't give her a XXXX. Schedule refuse.well she has paid XXXX so far.the other day they came and took our car, XXXX 's payment was n't received they say.we sent copy of check to them by e mail and fax.our bank did also, it was stamped by their bank a week before they stole our car.they said that we had five days to get mess straightened up or they were selling our car.they said it could take up to 48 hours to receive fax from our bank.on day three they say they found payment and even though it was their mistake, they need payoff plus repo fees or they 're selling our car in five days.I 'm losing my job because I use it for work XXXX.please help 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Fees charged are excessive are fraudulent. BB & T sent an email showing an item was unpaid, it was a CC payment. Looking at the statement it showed that another bank had removed funds and it failed by a few cents. I immediately put in another CC payment for a lesser amount so that the bill was paid on time. That transaction also failed so once again I put in another payment, that XXXX failed also. Come to find out the original email was wrong, the XXXX item was paid. This caused fees to rack up and for me to suspend any future deposits to the account. When I sent BB & t a message regarding these failures on I did n't receive a reply until weeks later and it was a typical canned response. I do not understand why you ca n't do the right thing for your customer and work with me. Also please communicate via email or if you must via postal mail. I do not have time to do the run around on the phone as I have a XXXX month old daughter that I am taking care of. I attempted to resolve this with them but they are n't budging and have reported the account to XXXX. All that was needed was a reversal of the fees charged, this is n't money they earned its ridiculous fees they made up. Had the original message been correct then the other fees would n't have occured in the first place. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I.Q Data International has incorrectly reported a debt that is affecting my credit score. The company has not taken my side of the dispute into account or the fact that the Texas Property Code Chapter 92 allows me to terminate my lease without penalty. The company is blatantly ignoring the law, Texas Property Code Chapter 92, in order to forcibly collect a debt that is not owed. The only verification they have provided about the debt is the account information from XXXX XXXX XXXX, which does not validate the accuracy of the debt. I am still receiving notification stating that I owe the debt even though the law states otherwise. 

This is my second complaint against the IQ Data International submitted to the Financial Protection Agency. My first complaint is referenced in case number XXXX where I provided all the background information regarding situation between the XXXX XXXX Apartments and I, and the incidents that transpired between IQ Data International and I on the first debt notification. 

Additionally, IQ Data International has failed to provide the below request information : 1 ) The date the debt was transferred from the original creditor to the third party debt collector 2 ) Proof of my agreement to pay the original creditor ; 3 ) Surety bond information As stated by the Texas Finance Code Section 392.202, a debt collection agency or credit bureau is required to provide the alleged debtor with specific information concerning their debt including but not limited to the above mentioned information. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I had a credit card with XXXX card services. The account # XXXX. XXXX closed my account and took away the reward points that were accumulated in this account. XXXX profited from their one sided action, which is illegal or at least unethical. I ask that XXXX will pay me the value of the rewards that were accumulated in the account 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response