AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: They called my cell phone and left a message and then went as far to call my place of employment and ask for the Human Resources department. This is an embarassment to me at my place of work for three years over something I dont even know of. Possibly debts that were from my XXXX. I am XXXX. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have n't use my card in days first I was overdraft XXXX than XXXX now XXXX, this bank is n't a honest bank at all, I had to take off my direct deposit so they can stop taking my money. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I sent letter stating that I am XXXX and " judgement proof. '' I included the FDCPA " Ceasing Communication '' statement. This letter was mailed to the Barclay Bank address on file for customer communications on XXXX XXXX, 2016. I have received multiple calls daily and five calls today from this company. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I received a copy of my credit report, and that is when I notice the collection account for National Recovery Agency. I was never notified by the collection company, so I was unable to dispute the account for which they are reporting. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I was asked by the cashier at XXXX if I wanted to apply for a card and get XXXX % off of my purchase, said no I have a card, he said that does not matter so I said go ahead then. 3 or 4 months later I applied for a loan and was declined because I had not paid XXXX in 3 months. 
I contacted XXXX they supposedly sent a bill and it was returned. They did this 3 times? They have my phone number, should't you make a phone call to see what was wrong? 
After my last conversation with XXXX I was told they would file papers stating I was disputing this claim. I have not heard back from them yet nor have I received the credit card or a statement since I started this futile search 3 weeks ago. I had credit scores in the XXXX or so range now I am at XXXX and can not get a loan. I pay out several thousand a month in bills when statements arrive. Why would I not pay a {$75.00} bill to XXXX? 
I could be out of business because of this and do not know where to turn next. 
Thank You 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX ( collection agency ) reported a debt from XXXX XXXX XXXX. ExperianXXXX deleted it. Now XXXX XXXX ( a different collection agency ) is reporting the same debt from XXXX XXXX XXXX and they refuse to delete it again. Also the debt is being reported TWICE on my credit report for the same amount and interest. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Received an unsolicited BankAmericard reward card. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Nationstar Mortgage company is the company that serviced our Mortgage since XXXX with an original loan amount of XXXX. This company used gross manipulation tactics, to get us to refinance and now are falling back on what was promised with regards to removal of the PMI from our loan. Calling, sending mailers and emailing again and again until we finally agreed to refinance in XXXX XXXX and at that time we were advised that we would receive a lower interest rate and could change the terms to payoff in 15 years so it was highly beneficial to complete the refinance. When going through the process we also discussed PMI and were advised that once the PMI dropped below 80 % of the original loan amount of XXXX we would no longer be responsible to pay that amount any longer and it would be removed from our payment amount. So we reached out to Nationstar as we are currently at XXXX and the 80 % valuation would be XXXX and we wanted to ensure that it would just auto remove. When contacting their Customer Service and PMI support we now are being advised that the amount is based on the Refinanced amount and that the new percent is 75 % of the loan amount at time of refinance for the PMI to be removed, which was in no way communicated to us. We would have not refinanced at all if there were any changes to the PMI as we were working hard to pay the balance down so that amount could come back to us and not continue to be removed. The representative said that this is because of XXXX and that the amounts are different now. This is wrong and we need help in getting resolution to this matter and ensuring that Nationstar can not continue to take advantage of customers this way. This is a lie and gross manipulation tactics and we need your help to resolve. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: On XXXX/XXXX/2016, I made a mobile check deposit from XXXX, to BBT. The check was in my name and the amount was {$2500.00}. BBT placed an administrative hold on the funds, until XXXX/XXXX/16. Once the funds were released, I learned that they had frozen my savings account where the check was desposited because they believed that the check was fraudulent. I then contacted XXXX, who told me that the funds had been sent, and that there was no way to get the money back. I contacted BBT multiple times and tried to resolve this issue, but as of XXXX/XXXX/2016, my savings account remains frozen, with no XXXX proof that the check was fraudulent. They told me that they had contacted metabank who told them that the check was unauthorized, but when I contacted metabank they claimed that no such call had occurred. A worker named XXXX in the fraud department for BBT actually placed the hold on the account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had disputed a charge on my account for {$380.00} due to faulty repair work on my Fridge. The initial charge was XXXX XXXX, 2015 and I disputed it on XXXX XXXX, 2015 and Bank of America credited it back to my account. However, the company sent them a copy of the receipt and Bank of America charged it back to my account. 

The complaint was not that it was not authorized, the complaint was they did n't repair the appliance and would not honor the guarantee. I have since bought a new fridge and want my money back to pay at least for part of the new XXXX! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The credit bureau would not properly investigate the public records that are not mine according to the State of South Carolina Department of Treasury and the XXXX County Court Clerk recorder, whom they did not verify any information with. It is against the FCRA to deem any public records as valid without contacting the source. The court stated that they do not verify any information with any of the credit bureaus. 
I sent the investigation in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 1681i., and they refused to respond and have broken the law once again. All letters have been sent certified as documentation. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: in regards to what is going on i have a collection account with Kimball trey & ST John due to an unlawful detainer through the XXXX courts. they claim that i owe them XXXX when the documents that i retrieved from the XXXX county courts say that i owe XXXX in which i have contacted them twice and offered to pay them the XXXX and they refuse to except saying that the XXXX was attorneys fees.and the Memorandum clearly states that the attorneys fees our only XXXX i sent them a copy of the paper work and i told them they where giving false statements to the credit bureau. i did disput the claim and the credit bureau said do an investigation and this was the next step that i am taking .what ever help i can get it is very much appreciated .Thank you in advance Sincerliy 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I pulled my credit report on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and noticed some collection accounts that I have never heard of before. The collection company in question Advanced Collection Bureau , Inc. claims that I owe money to them for a bill that I have had in the past. I demanded that they validate the debt under the FDCPA on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX via a letter sent regular mail, they never replied. They continue to keep this account on my credit report to this day after several rounds of letters to them demanding that they validate this debt. Now that this has gone on this long I am filing a complaint to have this debt removed from my credit report. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have XXXX hard inquiries on my transunion credit report that either are not mine or I did not authorize. They are for XXXX XXXX and XXXX. They are affecting my credit negatively are need to be removed. They were not done by me and the issue needs to resolved immediately before I am forced to take further actions. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX is mis reporting to Experian a collection that is 7 years old. It is a reporting a balance of {$500.00} with a date of last activity of XX/XX/XXXX in error. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Credit report lists my correct address and XXXX false address where I have never lived. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: FIA card service charges retroactive interest. For example, if I spend {$100.00} in XX/XX/XXXX, and payment for that is due on XXXX XXXX. If I pay on XXXX XXXX, I 'm charged for 13 days of interest, rather than one day of interest. Paying three days late therefore comes to an annualized rate of ~140 %. It 's disgustingly predatory. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: number from XXXX keeps calling my house and my cell phone. has also called my place of employment and also has contacted different relatives. calls not only once but several times to try to get information. i do not know who the are but he does state that is is XXXX XXXX. i think eric is the first name. my relatives have given me the information on the call but just says that the man or company keeps harrassing them to get information. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had bank of america and when I was trying to get a modfication they told me to stop paying my mortgage so I did cause they told me i was more likely to get it if I showed I couldt pay now they reported I was 17 payments behind on my mortgage which i was not and they refuse to take it off my credit report 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I currently rent a duplex located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX IA XXXX. The property was sold on XXXX/XXXX/2015 for {$180000.00}. The current owners used FHA financing and are not occupying the property. I know this because I 've been receiving their mail since the begging of XXXX. The mail is addressed to the current owners on record to my address which I have a lease agreement in place until XXXX. There was also {$20000.00} given by the seller back to the current owners for new windows for the property, this was given to the current owners from the proceeds of the sale. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, 2015 I received a letter from CitiMortgage stating The Making Home Affordable Program recently announced an expansion of borrower " pay for Performance '' incentives for eligible loans. I met all the qualifications and received the {$5000.00} which was applied to the principle. This {$5000.00} would have reduced my mortgage by $ XXXX monthly. The form to accept this offer required my signature only ( see attached ) Received my monthly statement from CitiMortgage for {$2000.00} instead of {$1900.00} ( recast ) incentive the paper work I received and phone contact from CitiMortgage all indicated I received the recast and was approved. Called CitiMortage was assigned to XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX # # XXXX EXT # XXXX. She stated only I had to accept the offer but all must sign the RECAST paperwork, if stands to reason IF ALL MUST SIGN TO RECEIVE THE REDUCTION IN THE MORTGAGE " ALL MUST SIGN TO ACCEPT THE OFFER AS WELL. I feel like a VICTIM OF A BAIT & SWITCH SCHEME. Please help me Im XXXX on a fixed income. $ XXXX monthly may not seem a lot to some but it is to me. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: inaccurate information in this account. 
improper collection practices 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian reporting inaccurate information on my credit file. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX has been paid and closed since XXXX XXXX, XXXX. I have filed multiple disputes on this account and each time I file a dispute they update with more inaccurate dates and information. Experian is reporting that this account is just now paid for on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. This is creating negative marks on my credit file. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a car loan out with this company more than a few years ago. I was in an accident and the vehicle was totaled. I had full coverage insurance along with full gap coverage. I am now getting letters saying that I still owe this company money on said vehicle. I have called several times to find out what and why I owe them money. The first few years they where telling me it was unpaid deductable. Which according to the insurance company was not the case. I have recently called trying to get answers to have this resolved and they are now trying to tell me this is for unpaid payments from the time of the total till the claim was paid? I asked them to please show me when and how much the payments where for and to explain why and how much I owe. They are unable to furnish this. All they ca ngive me is a total of what thy say I owe. I want this to be removed. There is no way I can owe them anything. My insurance says it was paid and the gap should have covered the rest! Im at my end with this. Please help. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I XXXX 2015 I disputed a charge from XXXX in the amount of {$380.00} because I paid them to repair my fridge, and it was not completed correctly. I called Bank of America on XXXX XXXX, 2015 and filed to dispute and they credited it back to my account on that same day. In XXXX they sent me a copy of the receipt XXXX had sent them stating the charge was valid because I signed. I never said I did n't make the charge - XXXX never made the repair good or honor their warranty. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Debt is for {$1500.00} Now they are asking for {$1700.00} because interest????? 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I had a business checking account at US bank. I applied for a merchant processing service through XXXX XXXX XXXX, connected to this bank account. I did not use or activate this merchant processing account. However US bank allowed them to take money from the account. At first it was {$43.00}. I then paid US Bank to block any further charges from this company. The merchant services company then came into the account under a different name and took {$490.00} which overdrew the account by $ XXXX. The bank then added fees on top of fees. The result was that the account was closed and charged off because I would not pay for this unauthorized charge. The bank should never have let such a charge go through when there was almost no balance in the account. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was first made aware that I had an outstanding debt with " mrs BPO '' entity when it first appeared as a derogatory entry reflecting an outstanding debt of {$830.00} ; and after extensive research and number out calls I was made aware that this is an entity owned by and/or affiliated with XXXX XXXX XXXX. I then called XXXX approximately 8-10+ times over a period of 4 weeks, with each call having spent in excess of 30-90 minutes per call ; each time ending the call with a different promise from each representative that I spoke to confirming that they would be researching the debt, and getting back to me with a resolution. Despite these promises on numerous, separate accounts, I never received any follow up- by phone, email not by US mail to validate the debt. The only information that I was given during one of my initial calls with XXXX was that their claim appears to reflect an amount outstanding for equipment that was not turned in following the termination of my cable contract with them dating back to 2011 ; to which I made it clear that I was 100 % certain that I did in fact turn my equipment in at the earlier date to which they were referring. My issue with them notwithstanding their dishonestly and lack of cocern and follow up ; was that I wqs Never informed by any Means ( phone email not US mail ) of this alleged debt, and the first instance was almost 5 years following the date of their claim on debt, never once by the entity themselves ( XXXX or under the Alias mrs BPO ) ; but only on the instance in my credit report 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I had a judgment placed on me in XXXX of 2012 by XXXX apartment complex for an eviction in the amount of XXXX plus XXXX in court fees. I have been trying to pay this judgment to the apartment complex that placed it as I was advised to do the the judge 's office over this case. The apartment complex added XXXX in additional fees on my account after the judgment was set in place and then sent my account to collections with Hunter Warfield that now has a total of XXXX. I contacted the judges office that granted the judgement and they stated I am only required to pay the judgment amount of XXXX plus XXXX in court fees. And that the apartments do not have the right to add charges after the judgment was placed. All charges due should have been brought to court when we went. I am trying to pay this judgment and they have refused my payment because of the incorrect balance they are reporting on my account. My rights under the FDCPA have been violated. 
( 1 ) Contacting me at my place of employment despite receiving verbal notice from me that I am not allowed to accept such calls at work. After I stated this to the customer rep and provided her with my cell number she called me right back at my place of employment the same day ; FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692c states : Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a debt collector CAN NOT call the consumer 's place of employment if they have been advised that calls can not be accepted at work. 

( 2 ) Using rude and a hostile tone by the manager I was transferred to after requesting a copy of the itemized of the debt in question because the customer rep state she could not provide me with that information, the manager stated he submitted the information to be mailed to me and I still have not received a copy of the itemized statement for these charges on this account that was requested a month ago ; FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692d states Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a debt collector CAN NOT Use any profane language or any language that is harassing and abusive FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692d states Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a debt collector CAN NOT Engage in any conduct, the natural consequence of which is to harass abuse or oppress. 

( 3 ) Continuing to report to all XXXX credit bureaus an incorrect balance owed of {$4500.00} after I provided a copy of my court judgment for this account stating I actually owe {$1800.00}. 
FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692e states Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a debt collector CAN NOT Send false information to the credit bureaus 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: Hi there, I have a complaint against Experian Credit Bureau. I have been paying for the credit services that they offer to track my credit and score for the past year. I have paid all of my bills on time and for some reason I do n't have a score with Experian but I have one with XXXX and XXXX. I am trying to obtain a loan and I am being denied because the creditors pull credit from this particular bureau. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My identity was stolen in XXXX and there are XXXX accounts on my credit report with TransUnion. i 've disputed the accounts five times in the last year and TransUnion refuses to remove them even though I 've sent supporting documentation and Police Reports to show the identity theft. 

The accounts are : XXXX with an amount of {$320.00} and XXXX with an amount of {$420.00}. NEITHER of these accounts belong to me and are both reported as FRAUD under my consumer statement. additionally the fraud that took place on my credit files so severe I had to legally change my first name. 

I 'm attaching copies of the police report as well as screenshots of the XXXX XXXX accounts. 

As per the XXXX other Credit bureau 's, XXXX remove both accounts from my credit file, and it 's currently under review with XXXX. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I submitted a claim earlier about XXXX XXXX XXXX and gave a description about what happened. The Cash store is another creditor they did the same thing as XXXX in the previous claim. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This is the 5th or 6th complaint on XXXX/Altisource for this fraudulent behavior. Can you please, please investigate. It continues and it gets worse! 
The house has been improperly and illegally foreclosed. 
Stolen payments, from Chapter XXXX, many different servicers, and in-house modifications. 

NOW THE NEW PROBLEM ; I HAVE A RELOCATION AGREEMENT THRU ALTISOURCE TO VACATE BY XXXX XXXX AND RECEIVE {$4300.00} TO AVOID EVICTION. I HAVE 4-5 E-MAILS CONFIRMING, ON SATURDAY XXXX XXXX/ALTISOURCE EMBARRASSED ME AT HOME IN FRONT OF MY NEIGHBORS WITH A CONTABLE SERVING ME AN EVICTION AND COURT DATE. 
How can this happen in America? This was a malicious act and done purposefully by the some or all of the above parties. The money ( XXXX ) is a drop in the bucket to the amount they have stolen, insulting completely. The amount stolen of the payment history and trustee report is XXXX XXXX. The amount added to modification is approximately XXXX ( un-justified and never explained ) NOW COMES COURT DATES AND XXXX TAX ISSUES. 
I will attach emails. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response