AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX is deliberately reporting erroneously information on my credit report. Payment due XXXX/XXXX/2016 with a 7-day extension to XXXX XXXX, 2016. XXXX XXXX reported on XXXX XXXX, 2016 that consumer was 30-days late. I have disputed this information with Transunion, and the investigation states the information was verified. XXXX is deliberately lying. How can a bill be 30-days late on XXXX XXXX, 2016 when it was due XXXX XXXX, 2016? 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Currently Wells Fargo is trying to foreclose on my home. I purchased a home from the XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX. I was incarcerated in XXXX of XXXX until XXXX of XXXX. A home equity loan was taken out without my permission and signed for sometime in the XX/XX/XXXX. I submitted a fraud complaint with Wells Fargo and provided proof of incarceration but somehow they still ruled against me. The home equity product is not even in my name so I can not even make an agreement with Wells Fargo. At this point I dont even understand what my options are or exactly where I go from here. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have payments of {$360.00}. a month for a 2012 XXXX XXXX. For the past two years everything was fine until I ran into some financial difficulties. If i miss a payment, they constantly call me several times a day.They also call my friends and relatives. I 've told them at least XXXX times to cease and desist. They still keep doing it. I want them to leave me alone. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citibank just acted most unfairly by charging me late fees without any type of notice. I only came to know about after seeing the results from my credit report where my FICO score has been impacted by reduction of XXXX points for a delay in payment for which there was no notification provided. After seeing the issue I went onsite and tried to reason with them and they still charged me {$80.00} over the original charge of {$20.00}. The most disturbing thing is that I have XXXX additional cards with Citibank which have never been late. It is also sad that they did not send any type of paper based statement to indicate delay or even considered making a phone call to indicate that there was delay in payment but kept charging me and then ruined my credit by reporting to XXXX without considering the ultimate consequences on my overall future to get great credit opportunities. I will like them to make amends by at least making sure that this negative information is removed from my credit report and ensure that an apology is issued to me for causing this level of stress. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have auto insurance, banking, and a homeowner 's policy with USAA. I am a XXXX vet who has trouble with short-term memory ( service connected at 90 % ). Last XX/XX/XXXX ( approximately ), my auto policy became wonky and there was some misinformation going back and forth. I spoke to someone in XX/XX/XXXX as I got a notice of cancellation. She helped me square things away, and stated the policy would not cancel after I made a payment over the phone. She also helped me change the billing date to XX/XX/XXXX, and explained the payments would be about XXXX per month. A week later, letters started arriving about cancellations, forcing me to pay the full policy up front, lapses in coverage, etc. I continued to make XXXX a month payments as I gave up. On XX/XX/XXXX, I opened up a XXXX Auto Policy and sent a letter to USAA to cancel my auto. I called today and was told my policy was cancelled for non-payment. 
Here 's where it gets worse. I tried to log on to access my bank account and my homeowners policy, and the system would not allow me access to these XXXX current accounts, stating I must call due to an issue. I called and was transferred to many people, and in fact XXXX of these folks refused to help ( especially a male in the banking side who forwarded me without helping me out ). USAA, who says they care for our Vets, do n't realize that XXXX and frustration do not help us out and that I was extremely XXXX after being passed around like this with many people in different departments. 
I told them, all I want is to access my bank account as it is XX/XX/XXXX. They told me in order to access my banking, I would have to go to the auto side and pay the XXXX payment for an outstanding balance ( which I disagreed with ). 
I went ahead and made the payment, so I could gain access to my bank account. After the payment was made, I was then told I still ca n't access my bank account until the payment clears, but after checking with the manager she came back and said it refreshes after midnight. I asked why I can not access my bank account as this is separate from the auto insurance division. I even went as far as stating that this is ransoming my financial product ( by stating they were kidnapping my account ), which I understand is a silly statement, but was said out of frustration. After 65 minutes on the phone, the only thing I have is a paid account ( which I do n't owe because I gave them the date of my Progressive policy ), and still no access to my bank account. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Recently I was wrongfully denied credit for a mortgage. To my surprise, the mortgage company said that I had a poor credit rating. When I investigated this issue, I discovered that Citi Cards is not reporting my CitiBusiness credit card account to the credit reporting agencies. The account 's high credit limit does not contribute to my credit utilization score as it should. I have a few other cards whose combined credit limits are much less than this account. On these cards I had taken advantage of 0 % interest offers, so over XXXX % of their combined available credit are in use. 

Citi Cards ' failure to report this card to the credit bureaus has seriously damaged my credit profile. This interaction with my mortgage company was highly embarrassing and negatively impacted my lifestyle. Citi Cards ' failure to accurately report my credit information to the credit bureaus has damaged my reputation and my good credit standing. 

I have pursued this issue with XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX. They say there is nothing they can do to get a company to report to them regarding an account if the the company does n't want to. 

I have discussed this issue many times with Citi Cards, and they refuse to report this account to the credit bureaus. I have been told that the reason this card is n't automatically reported to the bureaus is that they consider it to be a business card. However, the legal entity which holds this account is not a business, but is my wife and I, personally. The card is in the name of my wife and me, and the tax ID associated with the account in Citi Cards ' own records is my own personal Social Security number, not the federal tax ID of any business. Because I hold this account personally, and not through any business entity, I believe that Citi Cards is obligated under law to report this account to the credit bureaus that report my personal credit profile. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I very respectfully request a throughout review about the below claim against Freedom mortgage. I sincerely hope that it is resolved on my favor. 
Freedom mortgage has been reported the credit bureaus XXXX, XXXX and XXXX a late payment since XXXX 2015 which has been brought my credit score gradually very low to the point that I was denied a credit transaction. 
I have been greatly affected by this report and have been requesting them several times to fix it to no avail. I am still showing late and my credit score is dropping dramatically. It got to the point that one representative told me to not worry about it that they have all my payments done on time and that was a system mistake. All the times I spoke to Freedom mortgage officers the call was announced to be recorded so I am assuming there are plenty of recording to follow out conversations about my payments that prove I have been asking them many times to fix the issue. 
On XXXX XXXX, 2015 I applied for a refinance loan and was declined. The mortgage office told me I had been late in a mortgage payment since XX/XX/XXXX with Freedom mortgage and with that I was automatically disqualified for a mortgage refinance. 
I immediately call Freedom mortgage but they seem to not understand what is going on and just keep on saying it is going to be fine but the damage is done and they are not fixing it. Nobody has reached me with solutions either. 
I sent the paper work to the credit bureaus but I have not been contacted nor I see any change in my score. My problem needs to be solve with urgency as I am desperately need to refinance a mortgage with very high rate. I am experiencing financial loss due to the false report. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: We constantly receive voice messages from ERC, early in the morning, late in the evenings, during the weekends, for collecting debts we do not have. 
The voicemail give a reference number and we have been advised not to contact them as they would do anything to make us pay something we do n't owe. We are non-residents in the US and have no credits, no debts anywhere. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I received a letter from McCarthy , Burgess & Wolff, their reference number is XXXX. They are representing XXXX. I have never done business with that company. McCarthy, a debt collection company, claims that I owe XXXX I called them and told them that I did not do business with this company and that I will not pay this bill as I have never done business with XXXX. I continue to receive letters From McCarthy , Burgess & Wolff. Whom ever incurred this debt in my name is a criminal and the victim, XXXX, should file a police report in the proper jurisdiction. I am not responsible for this charge. 
Respectfully, XXXX 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Bank of America sold my mortgage loan to XXXX, XXXX. on XXXX XXXX, XXXX with XXXX Mortgage XXXX as the new servicer. Yet, three days later Bank of America with no further interest in this mortgage, scheduled the home to be auctioned, on their behalf, on XXXX XXXX, XXXX then rescheduled by them, for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank of America is a XXXX participating servicer. XXXX allows for full lien extinguishments I requested and was told that I qualified for full extinguishment of my second loan ( Loan # XXXX ) after I provided all requested documents to Bank of America including the XXXX Certification, XXXX Certification and Occupancy Certification form. I have not received the full extinguishment as promised by Bank of America and have been waiting. 
Under the XXXX Lien Modification Program ( XXXX ), when a borrower 's first lien is modified under the Home Affordable Modification Program ( HAMP ), a participating XXXX servicer, in accordance with any applicable pooling and servicing agreement or other investor servicing agreement, the XXXX servicer may elect to partially or fully extinguish a second lien. 
Effective XXXX 2013, Treasury expanded the XXXX program to include qualifying first liens that have been modified under the XXXX Standard Modification requirements. When a borrower 's XXXX lien is modified under the XXXX Standard Modification requirements and the first lien satisfies the HAMP eligibility criteria, the XXXX servicer must offer to modify or extinguish the borrower 's second lien under XXXX. 
I was told that through the extinguishment program, Bank of America will report to the major credit bureaus that the my second lien mortgage is now " paid and closed '' and has a XXXX balance. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Wells Fargo is looking to hold more than {$1000.00} in mortgage escrow account. When they were called they are telling me they need {$3700.00} for the same escrow amounts paid the prior year. Also I have health conditions and have made my payments bi weekly a few times due to financial hardship and they did n't apply my money to the loan they put the funds in a General ledger per the bank representative. I always though the funds had to be applied to the loan when the payment is made. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: RE ACCOUNT # XXXX CLIENT REFERENCE : # SAME COLLECTIONS ACCOUNT # XXXX XXXX CONTINUE TO GET OUTSTANDING BILLS FROM \XXXX XXXX XXXX. WHEN I SIGNED UP IT WAS ONLY A MONTH PROMOTION FOR XXXX A WEEK. I HAVE CALLED TO CANCEL AND CANCEL AND I STILL GET BILLS. NOW I AM IN COLLECTIONS SO I AM VERY UPSET. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have made several requests for Trans Union to verify with whom they received information regarding an item posted in my credit file which I have informed them is not mine. I forwarded a copy of the letter to the creditor to verify the debt as mine and they could not. But, I want to know with whom the credit bureau spoke with to allow them to keep " verify, no change '' report in my credit file. The debt is not mine nor could the creditor properly verify the debt as mine. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: there is an account that continues to report on my credit file from XXXX acct # XXXX and XXXX # XXXX also known as XXXX # XXXX after this acct has been established with the other credit bureaus and the companies to be fraudulent ... .. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: GS Holdings in NY called me last week and demanded I pay a debt and threatened that papers were filed to sue me. I gave them my debit card after they told me they would send verification that I paid and the debt was cancelled as soon as my card went through. They immediately took {$1000.00} out of my account..I never received any verification letter ( they were supposed to email it ) .I waited 5 days and no letter so I contacted my bank and they reported it as fraud. I realized I was scammed. One week later a man named XXXX XXXX the director of operations so he said, called and started threatening me because I cancelled the payment and reported it. He started screaming at me and threatening me. I told him to stop yelling at me that he was not my father and he is unprofessional. He screamed " You sound like my wife '' ... .I told him I talked to my lawyer and my lawyer said to have GS holdings call him call him. The man started screamed at me again and then hung up. I tried to call the number back and it said the number was unavailable. That is definitely fishy, why would a legitimate company not have telephone that worked? And they called off different numbers but all from XXXX XXXX My lawyer said debt collectors can not call you and they can not yell at you or threaten you. He told me to absolutely not pay it, he thought it was a scam!! They should be shut down!!! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I noticed XXXX fraudulent transactions posted to my Citibank line of credit. I first reported the discrepancy on XXXX XXXX, 2015. The XXXX transactions are posted as transfers from my line of credit, in the amount of {$500.00} each, to my checking account. 

On XXXX XXXX, 2015 I requested an investigation. I informed the Citibank representative that the transactions are posted as transfers to my checking account, from my line of credit. The representative informed me that the transactions are posted as teller withdrawals on their system. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have asked to have addresses removed from my credit report because I have never lived there and I just had a background check and found that the addresses are still on my report 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I received repeated phone calls to my cell phone IC Systems today I finally contacted a manager XXXX XXXX to stop blowing up my cell phone and demanded all communication only by mail be sent to me 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: ENHANCED RECOVERY CORP, was disputed and removed off all my credit report only to show back up with misleading information. This account with XXXX was opened up by another person using my information fraudulently. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This debt was paid on XXXX/XXXX/15 which settled this account. I was informed that this would not show on my credit any further. Upon obtaining a new job my credit was ran and this still showed on my report. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Since XXXX XXXX I am a Medicaid recipient and this benefit has never stop. This company is trying to collect a debt that I do not owe because Medicaid pays all the bills that we owe. The situation and my concern is that XXXX members of my family have been contacted by this agency and XXXX of them paid more than XXXX XXXX dollars for a debt from XX/XX/XXXX when he was a child. Also my uncle who is medicaid recipient too, is being harassed by them trying to collect a suppose debt. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I opened a checking account funded with my Barclays Wyndham credit card for {$10000.00}, and they posted the transaction as a cash advance and charged me a {$500.00} cash advance fee. The charge should NEVER have gone through as my cash advance limit was limited to {$6000.00}. This is a security issue on their part letting transactions go through that are higher than the stated limits on the card. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have attempted to dispute this fraudulent XXXX XXXX XXXX account with Experian multiple times, and they refuse to remove it. This account does not belong to me. I am a victim of identity theft. I now have IN WRITING, a letter from the original creditor directly, stating this account was fraudulent and they have requested it be removed. The name on the account ISNT EVEN MINE! 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I Applied for mortgage with Citi with a closing date on a new home being built by XXXX XXXX. Citi did n't schedule final inspection properly and resulted in my closing date being delayed by 4 business days. Per Citi, ( taken from Citi webpage ) " On-Time Closing Guarantee - We 'll close on time or give you {$1500.00}! '' with the following restrictions - XXXX " If you are purchasing a home, we guarantee to close by the date specified in your purchase contract, unless prohibited by federal law, * and further provided that the date is at least 30 days after the application date and the date of your purchase contract. If your loan fails to close on time due to a delay by Citibank, you will receive a credit toward closing costs of {$1500.00}. Offer not available for refinance loans, co-ops, unapproved condos, residences under construction, community lending programs and government loans. In Texas, the credit may not result in your receiving cash back. ( *Federal law requires certain disclosures be delivered to the borrower at least 3 business days before consummation. The Guarantee to close does not apply if such disclosures are required and your closing is delayed due to the 3-business-day waiting period. ) '' Loan Application was formally made XX/XX/XXXX, giving approximately 60 days until scheduled closing. 

Home construction was finished Approximately XXXX XXXX, XXXX and I had the final inspection/walkthrough with the builder shortly after. The final inspection scheduled with citi was scheduled with loan officer for XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Due to Citi scheduling issues, the inspection was rescheduled for XXXX XXXX and finally took place on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 

Citi did not honor on-time closing guarantee stating that house was under construction at time of application. While this is true, that condition is not explicitly stated in Citi 's terms and restrictions. The house was NOT under construction when Citi encountered a scheduling error ( holidays maybe? ) and there for should still be eligible for the on-time closing guarentee per the verbage of Citi 's Terms and Restrictions as they apply to the 'on-time closing guarentee ' The fault for a late closing rests solely with Citi and was in no way influenced by the actions, or lack there of, of myself or the home builder. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response