AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I terminated payroll service with Bank of America XXXX last year. This year they started changing my credit card again for the service which I am not using. I send them emails but they are unresponsive. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a several months problem with payments for XXXX credit card in view I have made payments on time or before but Regions reject payments for regions technical problems, the situation is that I have just XXXX checking XXXX Bank account and just to pay on line monthly pressing checking account bottom but regions bank set up this account as a savings and change automatically the payments issue collecting from a savings account instead checking account. I have visited 4 times Regions bank branches but they refuse to fix this problem and I dont have another checking account. Now This negligence affect to my credit report for late payments and Regions'customer service don want to fix the problem. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Ref : Car Ref This is the XXXX 4 times bank of America refused to give me credit ; I Had been trying to reestablished an account with Bank of America and it has keep denying me for either credit cards or bank loan.. I had apply with other loan and card companies and got approved .. I do not understand why bank of America is discriminating me since my property foreclose was canceled by the court. Bank of America is refusing or helping me to reestablished my credit that I already had. I hold other account with max credit of {$6000.00} in good standing and my credit score is XXXX approx. But i do not understand why bank of America is refusing to give credit. I feel discriminated by Bank of America. Please Help 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX VA XXXX XXXX You are in Violation of The FCRA You must supply to me the method of your investigation and VALIDATION not verify everything. 

You must remove the Fraud alter from my credit profile!!! 

You must remove the inquiry for XXXX from my credit report!!!!! I never applied to XXXX DO NOT OPEN A FRUAD ALERT!!!! 

You must remove payment plan from XXXX there is no payment plain account is closed I request the method of verification, under the FCRA section 611 ( a ) ( 7 ). 


Escalate his call to a supervisor do not use the e-Oscar. System You must update my credit score!!!! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Sears updated their website somewhere around last XXXX, 2015. I have ( XXXX ) credit cards with Sears, issues are with both the cards access to internet customer portal. Ever since then, I am not able to access my account online to pay my statement without having major issues which have resulted in payments not being posted, late charges incurred, etc ... Access to the website takes minutes to gain. Each time I try to click on an option for my account, that process also takes a very unusually long length of time. I am not able to access my rewards points from the website to redeem them, I have been trying to redeem them for the past 5 months. I have contacted Sears online support numerous times and spent a great deal of unnecessary time trying to get help for me to access my account to make payments and redeem rewards points. Each phone call I 've made, I was promised they would have someone from technical support trouble shoot and get back with me. I have not heard from anyone. I am extremely frustrated to say the least!! To date they have not fixed the problem. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My property management placed the judgment for a debt with a debt collector and reported the debt to XXXX. I have disputed the amount of the debt with XXXX who rejected my dispute. 
The court judgment amount is for {$2900.00}, which I am willing to pay. However, the collection amount placed by property management is {$10000.00} which is not allowing me to seek financing to purchase a home and overall has fractured my credit. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: I have forwarded all required documentation to Wells Fargo Bank regarding a short sale and they have acknowledged receipt of the material. They indicate they are in receipt and blatantly stated that they will not rescind the foreclosure sale date of XX/XX/2016 even though we have a cash buyer who is ready to close escrow. I have been told that they have n't been able to complete their review of the properly submitted material. On numerous occasions they have asked me to re-submit documents that have been sent previously and acknowledge receiving. When I make phone calls and leave messages, it takes them several days to respond, even though it is clear that time is of the essence. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a mortgage with Bank of America and sold my home in 2010. 
I signed closing papers, closed out the mortgage, transferred ownership of the property. 
Bank of America today still has my mortgage reported as open, reporting past due balances in excess of XXXX, negatively impacting my credit. 
I have attempted several contacts directly to BOA, always with the same response, someone will get back to me shortly. Several months later, no one has. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been trying to get my annual free credit report from all the agency so that i can dispute whats on their and every time they keep telling me i have to pay to get a report from them. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The criminal history section on my report is inaccurate. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Disputed this XXXX account with both XXXX and Experian multiple times. Experian continues to verify. XXXX has agreed to delete this account and request removal from all bureaus. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This is the second complaint I am entering for the same issue. 
I have attempted to call and repeated left messages with no response. 
XXXX XXXX CST left message, XXXX XXXX XXXX CST left message, XXXX XXXX CST left message, XXXX XXXX CST left message, XXXX XXXX CST left message. 
I received one phone call on XXXX acknowledging my complaint, and have not heard back since. 
My complaint is that I had a mortgage with Bank of America, the house has been sold, property transferred over 7 years ago. BOA still has my mortgage reported as open with a past due balance of over XXXX. This is negatively impacting my credit and prevents me from future home purchase and financing. I have tried to contact the bank prior to the complaint, but each time, someone at BOA will acknowledge that the facts I provided are correct and it is a mistake, and they will get back to me with a resolution. No one ever has. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Victim 's debit card was used to fraudulently withdraw {$27000.00} from my Checking and Money Market accounts with SunTrust. 
On XX/XX/XXXX, Victim filed an online report of fraud ( Claim XXXX ) with SunTrust 's Fraud Department On or about XX/XX/XXXX, Victim filed a report with XXXX Police ( Case # XXXX. Note : On page XXXX of said report, the alleged offender acknowledged his guilt. 
On/about XX/XX/XXXX, Victim prepared and filed FTC complaint XXXX. 
On/about XX/XX/XXXX, Victim filed a 2nd compliant with XXXX Police Department ( Case # XXXX ), XXXX Police Department, XXXX, GA XXXX, Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX On XX/XX/XXXX, Victim filed a report with XXXX XXXX Police Department ( Case # XXXX, XXXX XXXX Police Department, XXXX, GA XXXX, Phone : ( XXXX ) XXXX On/about XX/XX/XXXX, Victim filed a FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center ( ICXXXX ) # XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have submitted a complete mortgage modification application based on a material change in my financial circumstances and Wells Fargo Bank acknowledged receipt of my complete mortgage modification packet in XXXX XXXX, however since that time Wells Fargo Bank has not requested any additional documentation or sent out any decision. 
Civil Code section 2923.6 precludes the recordation of a notice of default where the borrower has submitted a " complete '' application for a loan modification on the first deed of trust, while the application is pending, or until the lender gives the borrower a written decision regarding the borrower 's eligibility for the loan modification. This section only applies to a first deed of trust on the borrower 's principal residence. If violated, the statute allows for injunctive relief to postpone a trustee 's sale and allows for a private right of action for damages, including attorneys ' fees, to the prevailing borrower for a violation. 
I have also never been contacted by a single point of contact and Wells Fargo Bank has not explored all foreclosure relief alternatives. Lender Compliance with Civil Code sections 2923.5 BEFORE notice of default can be filed, Civil Code section 2923.5 requires lender to contact borrower in default and " assess the borrower 's financial situation and explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure. '' Lender must attempt to make contact with " due diligence ''. The due diligence required is set forth in the statute. The CA. Homeowner Bill of Rights also provides that dual tracking protections can also protect homeowners who have been previously denied a modification, if the homeowner documents and submits a " material change in financial circumstances. '' I did submit a material change application with evidence of additional income and yet Wells Fargo has gone intentionally silent to preclude the ability to seek all foreclosure relief alternatives. 
Additionally, I have received XXXX curb appraisals from Wells Fargo Bank, XXXX in the amount of {>= $1,000,000}, and XXXX in the amount of {>= $1,000,000}. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX Wells Fargo sent out a 30 day notice to pay my past due amounts owed, or they would seek foreclosure. 
As a result I have been forced to accept a below appraised value offer on my primary residence in the amount of {>= $1,000,000}. 
Wells Fargo knows that any sale of my home will make any alleged beneficiary whole and yet they choose to foreclosure over the alternative to provide me with the ability to preserve my equity, and still be able to provide the beneficiary with a XXXX repayment, including all alleged arrears. 
I would like the CFPB to investigate this dual tracking issue, lack of due diligence issue, as I would like my SPOC to contact me to explore all foreclosure relief alternatives to avoid foreclosure, and be given more time to sell my home without being forced to seek State Law injunctive relief and Federal reorganization plans. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Regions Bank rearranges the posting of items to checking accounts in order to collect higher overdraft fees. I had transactions from XXXX/XXXX/2015, XXXX/XXXX/2015 & XXXX/XXXX/2015 leaving a balance of a little over {$12.00} in my bank account. All those items should have moved from pending and been posted to my account, as they show they were on XXXX/XXXX/2015. A new transaction, dated XXXX/XXXX/2015 in the amount of a little over {$44.00} show as pending on my account. The bank then rearranged all the items, to pay out the XXXX item for {$44.00} and then paying several smaller items, therefore ; charging a total of {$140.00} in overdraft fees. Their explanation is that their practice is to pay out the largest items XXXX so that mortgages, rent payments, car payments do n't get turned down and then pay the small items. This makes no sense, as no matter what, I have the setting on my account that all items get paid regardless of funds, so nothing would be turned away. In addition, the smaller items were already moved from pending on the XXXX and the higher item came in on the XXXX ; therefore, they are putting this item before other items already posted to my account. Upon contacting them, they refuse to do anything. This practice is taking advantage of peoples misfortune and only benefits the bank by allowing them to rearrange items in order to allow them to charge several overdraft fees as opposed to only XXXX. My overdraft charge should be for XXXX item for {$36.00} instead, it 's {$140.00}. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: After applying for a job online, I received a cashier 's check on XXXX XXXX, 2015, for the amount of {$1900.00} with an offer via text for a job position as a XXXX. The stated reason this check was sent to me was to cover errands and complete some tasks as his personal assistant. Before cashing the check, me and my husband were suspicious, so we went to Navy Federal Credit Union to verify the check was real. I was helped by one of their representatives whom I asked " when the check would be clear '' the representative responded " Within a day. You should have it by tomorrow. '' They assured me the check would be cleared by the next day, meaning within XXXX hours. 

Based on these assurances from Navy Federal, I followed further instructions from my supposed new employer to send XXXX wire transfers for {$800.00} and {$900.00} to XXXX, TX. A week later, Navy Federal removed the {$1900.00} and said that it actually takes up to 30 days for a check to clear. The check in fact did not clear after the funds had already been made available, and now my account is delinquent {$900.00}. Thankfully {$800.00} was held by XXXX XXXX and was able to be recovered. The manager repeatedly apologized saying they need to increase training of their staff to avoid this sort of " miscommunication. '' I hold Navy Federal as an accomplice to crediting a fake check under their stated position while still pursuing me for an illegitimate debt where the funds were and then were not available under my name. I have filed police reports and saved all documentation of the fraud committed upon me. Regardless, none of this would have happened had Navy Federal not misinformed me as to the status of the initial cashier 's check. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My account I had with Credit Acceptance was paid in full on XXXX 2010. It is currently being reported as " charged-off '' and a " collection '' account on my XXXX credit reports. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have disputed a lien with Transunion for the amount of XXXX the lien has been paid off and I received a lien release and forward it by fax to Transunion . Transunion updated the lien as paid but did n't erase it from my credit. I was told by XXXX who placed the lien it would be removed from my credit. I told Transunion the same thing and they still wont delete it. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: During a period between XX/XX/XXXX-XX/XX/XXXX I was required to visit the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX XXXX. At the time I was without any form of insurance, and applied for and was approved for what was then termed " XXXX XXXX '' which was sponsored and paid directly by XXXX for uninsured, low-income patients. However, the application was apparently mishandled and the information never properly submitted, so I now have multiple negative credit items reflected on my credit reports ( for several visits, but all covered by the submitted XXXX application at the time ) Due to the manner in which billing is done at the medical center, these negative items are being reflected as different credit items from several departments, and none of them acknowledge or notate the approved XXXX XXXX assistance by XXXX. The items listed and in need of removal include the following : XXXX $ XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX XXXX $ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX REC $ XXXXMy credit score is at least XXXX points lower than it should otherwise be as a result of the failure/refusal of XXXX and the credit bureau 's to remove the items covered by my XXXX insurance. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The last few ( at least XXXX ) statements for my Bank of America credit card have not shown the balances subject to various promotional balance transfer offers that I have taken advantage of. I had this same problem in 2015, and the problem was corrected on a few statements. But now the error has returned. When this happened last year Bank of America took months to resolve the issue and did n't seem to care that they were sending out XXXX incorrect statements. The person assigned to handle my case often did not return calls and was basically useless. A perfect example of a " too big to fail '' bank that does n't care about their customers. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX, XXXX XXXX SOC SEC # XXXX DOB XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX Experian Dispute Department XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX. 


I recently submitted a request for investigation of an Acct Number : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$1500.00} REV {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX SETTLED XP/XXXX Late Dates : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$500.00} REV {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX PD WAS XXXX XP/XXXX Late Dates : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$490.00} REV {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} XXXX 1 PD WAS XXXX XP/XXXX/XXXX Late Dates : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX {$400.00} REV {$0.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} XXXX PAID CHGOFF XP/XXXX I 've submitted enough information regarding the fraudulent account that 's open in my name I have provided information for your company to have carried out a reasonable investigation of this dispute. If you had investigated properly rather then using your XXXX system you would have noticed that this account is not mine which your companies have claimed to " Verified ''. Since you 've obviously neglected to investigate this account thoroughly I am demanding you remove this account off my profile. It is at this time that I will point out the in XXXX v XXXX, XXXX v. XXXX ( Experian ), and XXXX v. XXXX, XXXX et, the courts ruled each and every time that the CRA could n't merely " Parrot '' information from the creditors and collection agencies ... that they have conduct an independent REASONABLE investigation to ensure the validity of the debt and honesty/integrity of the creditors/CA in question. Sending out a generic form through the XXXX system that does n't even contain my reasons for the dispute is not reasonable. 

If you do n't initiate an investigation regarding my dispute, as it is my right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, I will have to take legal action to protect my credit rating and myself. Which I 'm sure you are aware each violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows damages of {$1000.00} should this matter ends up in court. 
I look forward to an expedite resolution of this matter Thank you. 


XXXX, XXXX XXXX SOC SEC # XXXX DOB XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Since I have n't had debt to anyone for over the last twenty or more years I 'm concerned about the frequent calls from Rushmore Service Center # XXXX in XXXX XXXX, SD, a third party collection agency that gives me at least four calls a week. I have no need to answer the phone from them, a quick look on XXXX tells me who they are. The calls from them have been going on for several months now and they need to stop. I suspect they have the wrong number and need to correct their file. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have called several times, I 'm trying to get a mortgage and XXXX of the credit companies show this debt as paid and XXXX does not. First lady I spoke to said she would have a letter sent out showing the debt paid. I waited a week and called back. The guy I talked to was so manipulative, trying to get me to say I did n't pay it. Then he told me he did n't know what the status was but he could n't collect the money so I repeated I do not owe you any money because you do n't have an account for me. He knows he 's being recorded so he would not say anything. Although at the beginning of the conversation he told me it shows its been paid off. All I wanted was a letter showing it was paid off, now I feel like they are going to do something and try to get more money from me. Completely unprofessional and predatory. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Cap Mgmt Called friends ; told them this was my last day to pay and threatened my account would be " sent to the courts ''. I called Cap Mgmt. Told them I could not pay. I told the rep I was on the road and that I would call later. They kept pressuring me to set up a payment plan. Because I was in a dangerous position ( driving ) I agreed to a payment plan I can not execute. I provided them with banking info. This plan was obtained under duress by Cap Mgmt. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: In 2015 I applied for a Bloomingdale 's American Express Card and used it like 2-3 times. The last time I used it was for the purchase of a train ticket. However, that trip did n't happen so I got a partial refund of the ticket price, leaving around {$30.00} as a balance. Then I left U.S for 3 weeks and forgot about this balance since I did not use this card often ( only when I made a purchase at Bloomingdale 's ). After 4 months I got XXXX calls asking me to pay off and card balance and at that point it was $ XXXX including all late charges. And my card was closed because I missed all the payments. So I paid off the huge amount. However, another 3 months later I got XXXX calls asking me to pay additional $ XXXX late charges. It was just unacceptable! Why would they let me know earlier and why would there be additional charges after my card was closed! The worst thing is, after I negotiated with them ( they were just unfriendly and unhelpful ), I paid another {$42.00} and made sure that would the last payment I make -- it is still unreasonable to me but I 'm super busy, I do n't want to be haunted by them again, not to mention my credit history could be negatively impacted. I thought it was the end. But today, I saw another {$4.00} charge posted to that account -- I mean seriously? What are they trying to do to me!!! This is unbelievable and unacceptable!!! I disposed my card a long time ago because I thought the nightmare ended!!! I never ends!!! Bloomingdale 's American Express card is just HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!! 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response