AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I am a Citi credit card customer for almost 8 years. I made a credit line request from online account on XXXX XXXX 2015. The request resulted in a Hard inquiry on my credit report. 
The credit line increase with Citi card has always been a soft inquiry for me in the past 8 years. 
In response to my complaint with CFPB, Citi executive replied ( response attached ) " When a credit limit increase request is submitted, online or by telephone with a representative, the request may be instantly approved without a credit bureau review. If the request requires additional review, you are notified that we need to obtain a copy of your credit bureau report. " When I applied online my request was immediately denied. I did not get a message that someone will respond to me in 24 hours. Based on the Citi executive response I contacted them again and the representative mentioned it specifically mentions if my credit bureau report will be pulled. The website interface is very misleading, when a customer goes to Credit line increase page, sometimes it says " customer will receive instant decision and bureau report will not be requested and few other times it says " bureau report will be obtained and reviewed in 24 hours '' ( see attached ). I told representative that I might have been shown the page with bureau report required but since I was declined instantly it should have been the page when it does n't require credit check. When I asked for a proof the executive said, she can not provide the proof of which page I clicked on as the information is proprietary. I do not understand if it is my information why the bank can not share with me what I submitted rather than saying I must have clicked on the page which says bureau report required. 

I have attached below : 1 ) Previous complaint and Citi 's response. 
2 ) XXXX screenshots of different message on the same page which leads to confusion for the customer. 
I would appreciate if Citi can remove the hard inquiry as my request was instantly declined and if it was a hard pull page I would have got a message after my request that it will be reviewed within 24 hrs. 
It is sad that Citi can not provide the proof and mistrust a customer woh has been banking with them for 8 years. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The day after my monthly car payment is due Wells Fargo calls me constantly, between 4-8 times a day. While I 'm at work, while I 'm eating dinner, while I 'm tucking my kids at night. This has been going on for almost a year despite my constant pleas to them to stop. It 's giving me XXXX and I do n't even want to turn my phone on anymore. Please help me. I do n't know what to do! 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Shellpoint Mortgage servicing has not paid my taxes since they purchased my loan The money is siting in escrow and I am being charged interest by the NY state government. They have made other errors as well such as listing the wrong mortgage rate. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: I am using Wells Fargo as my primary bank account. On XXXX XXXX, 2015, someone has been using my card without my permission ( Unauthorized transaction ). My card were not stolen ( I had my card with me ). The unauthorized transaction was being made at XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ), XXXX XXXX ( XXXX XXXX ), XXXX XXXX ( XXXX 's ), XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), and etc,. XXXX transaction with the same amount of {$36.00} were made in XXXX ( total of {$73.00} ), XXXX transaction of exactly {$100.00} was made in XXXX, XXXX transaction of exactly {$200.00} was made in XXXX XXXX ( Total of {$600.00} ), XXXX transaction of {$2600.00} was made in XXXX 's and XXXX transaction of XXXX was made in XXXX. I was in XXXX XXXX with my wife on the same night ( As a proof, I made some transaction inside the city of XXXX XXXX ). All the transaction made within XXXX XXXX were done by me and my wife, but other transaction made outside the XXXX XXXX, such as XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX, were not me or others with my permission. Also, I was within the XXXX area, so every transaction I made was inside the XXXX of XXXX XXXX ( such as XXXX, XXXX XXXX and XXXX was used by me ). I filed my claim to Wells Fargo, and they gave me a temporarily credit of {$3400.00} on XXXX XXXX, 2015. But, I just received a mail saying that my claim is closed and they deducted the temporarily credit of {$3400.00} from my account. On the letter, it said, they have completed their research of my inquiry about charges to my account. Based on the information available to them ( Wells Fargo ), they found the charges were made by me or someone who had my permission. I do n't know what exactly happened because I had my card with me, and the only people who knows my pin number is my wife and I. But my wife is always with me 24hours a day, and she was with me on that day too. Also, it 's funny because I have never been to XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX 's, XXXX XXXX or XXXX XXXX before. How can I make a transaction in a place I have never been to? Please help me find my money back. Thank you. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Visited the Wells Fargo Bank at XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX, Georgia XXXX to cash a check in the amount of {$120.00}. The check was drawn on the Wells Fargo Bank. I was asked to present XXXX forms of ID and a " Thumb Print '' on the check. After a few minutes, I was then asked if I had an account at their bank. I told them that the check was drawn on their bank and that I was doing electronic work for the owner of the checking account. The bank told me that there was a {$7.00} dollar charge for cashing this check, and if I opened an account, there would no charge to cash the check. I am XXXX years old and I did not like the high pressure tactics used to get me to open an account at the Wells Fargo Bank. No signs were displayed anywhere in the Bank to let the public know of their policy and charges for non customer check cashing. Just the high pressure sales pitch! 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This On-Site company has abused this service that reports inaccurate and bogus credit reporting information to a leasing agents by the name of XXXX Apartments and whomever else they have accounts established here in XXXX XXXX, NV. They asked me to submit documentation to support my disputes for all disputes and discrepancies, and have submitted from both official documents from the US Federal Bankruptcy court of the list of debts discharged in my BK-XXXX on XXXX XXXX, XXXX and a XXXX XXXX XXXX Police report dated XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX of my stolen/lost ID and various other personal information for accounts opened in XXXX that are not mine. Yet XXXX did not do their due diligence to review my official documents to clear my credit file and gave XXXX XXXX a recommendation to not lease to me at the XXXX XXXX. Also, they are incorrectly reporting an old case that was erroneously filed by XXXX XXXX, where I initially leased back in XXXX. That situation has been RESCINDED and cleared from XXXX County public records. And should not have been filed in the first place since the situation was taken care of and paid in full prior to filing the Summary Motion from XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX will be addressed accordingly. On-site rental reporting company has created damages to my reputation and integrity to have their damaging and inaccurate report. sent to prospective landowners/leasing agents. I have been in the mortgage lending industry since XX/XX/XXXX, and On-Site.com is violating FCRA and XXXX Credit laws, US Federal Bankruptcy laws and now stated defamatory remarks to my personal character and integrity on their ill reports which in turn prevents me from living a safe and comfortable lifestyle They have not properly researched for truth or accuracy, yet refuses to accept my official supporting documentation. Nor has XXXX conducted reasonable investigation of my disputes, they are reporting incomplete and inaccurate information, and have refused to accept my documentation to verify and report debts that are paid in full. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: As of my XXXX XXXX, XXXX, billing statement I have incurred a {$26.00} late fee and also interest charge of {$20.00} on my statement for my Citibank thankyou XXXX credit card. I have my account on automatic payments since I received this credit card, and my personal checking account has been debited every month in the amount of {$25.00} on the due date. I also was signed up with a 0 % promotion when I obtained the card in XXXX of XXXX with no interest until XXXX of XXXX. The customer service agent advised that I have incurred interest charges since XXXX XXXX on my account, and I was not notified of this, as I did not receive any e-mails on my account, nor written correspondence in reference to this matter, nor was I contact about this either. I am being billed fraudulently for interest and also billed a late fee. I spoke with Citibank credit card today and was informed that I never was given this promotion, which, is inaccurate and that my payments changed from autopay to recurrent, which, I DID NOT DO AND DID NOT AUTHORIZE TO MY ACCOUNT. I also did not receive any e-mail notifications to my e-mail address about any changes regarding the above issue nor changes to my account. I have paid my balance in full for the amount of {$3400.00}. I was informed by customer service once the account was up to date in payments, I would receive a credit of my late fee and interest charges accrued. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Keep calling with a very aggressive tone, I stated I would try to make a payment when I can and now they are still calling and threatening me. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have been working with Wells Fargo related to an equity line that ballooned XXXX XXXX. Over a year later I was finally able to get Wells Fargo to make payment arrangements with me ( Reference previous CFPB case # XXXX ). After contacting the CFPB I was finally able to get Wells Fargo to make payment arrangements. I began making those payments in XXXX XXXX and I was required to make 3 trial payments - XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX in the amount of {$300.00}. I made all 3 payments in a timely manner. Then in XXXX XXXX I began making payments of $ XXXX/mo. I was sent a loan agreement in XXXX which I was required to sign. I took issue with language in the document and the credit reporting by Wells Fargo and filed another complaint with the CFPB regarding that matter. In addition I sought legal counsel and retained the services of XXXX XXXX XXXX to review the loan document. I executed/signed that document at my attorney 's office and it was notarized and sent back to Wells Fargo at the address listed on the document. I continued to make payments of $ XXXX/month in XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX & XX/XX/XXXX. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX I received a letter indicating that my agreement was void because I had failed to return the signed document. I immediately contacted XXXX XXXX and left a message for him. I did not hear from him so 2 days later I called again and left another message. My calls were never returned. I was given the name of XXXX XXXX as an internal Wells Fargo contact where I could file a complaint so I attempted to contact XXXX. However, in doing so I reached a person at XXXX XXXX ' number who seemed very helpful. I explained the entire situation to her. She said that she could not find the signed loan document????? She was going to talk with XXXX XXXX and get back to me if there was anything further that I needed to do. I continued to make payments in the amount of {$600.00}. My loan was finally set up online and I was able to see the payments recorded so it seemed that all was fine. However, today I received my check sent to Wells Fargo on XXXX XXXX, XXXX returned with a letter dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX stating that this " check can not be accepted because it is insufficient to pay off the entire balance on the account. '' I have met all of my obligations in this matter. My legal counsel worked with me to fulfill the required signed, notarized document and yet Wells Fargo now is coming back to me as if to begin all over again and continue this as if none of my payments were ever received. I am desperately in need of your assistance. Thank you in advance. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citi Bank has determined that my account is over their credit line of {$75000.00} when my total charges are {$59000.00}. I made a payment of {$36000.00} on XXXX nand they put a hold on that payment and treated it as a charge resulting in a {$95000.00} balance. This is wrong. I talked to XXXX people yesterday and am currently on hold now over 15 minutes. I mentioned your agency and that woke them up. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My loan is with Sallie Mae. I have an ongoing, terrible situation with Sallie Mae private loan department. I have spoken to several different customer advocates who have been able to help some but the last one I spoke with les me astray and now Sallie Mae says I owe {$800.00} immediately which I do not have. 

I took a private loan in XXXX 2013 so I could finish XXXX school and my father in law cosigned. Ever since my loan has graduated from the grace period, Sallie Mae always calls and harrasses my cosigner and NEVER contacts me. I have to speak with the customer advocate who has helped with payments but never handles the issue of my cosigner receiving XXXX % of calls and mailings. I have yet to receive anything. 

I have used my forbearance time and am having trouble paying. My husband has been out of work and we have recently moved to take new jobs and our income has yet to catch up. My cosigner is in poor health and does not work. I spoke with a customer advocate who said I could sign up for an income based plan which would take my payments from {$210.00} to {$68.00} which is much more doable. And would erase my late fees once I made three payments. I spent over an hour on the phone with her going over my financials, as did my cosigner. She then called back the next day and said she had to forward to financial for approval and asked me to go over my financials again saying that because I had a monthly deficit that financial would not approve me and we should try to change some things. I was confused and worried because neither myself or my cosigner have available funds. She said she would call the next day. We also set up two years of payments at the {$68.00} amount. 

It took her four days and when she called back she was very curt and said financial said between me and my cosigner we made too much for the income based and the payment would stand at {$210.00} and we owed {$800.00} back payment. She could not extend the amount or help with any postponement of payments. She also never addressed the problem of the reps calling and threatening the cosigner. 

I am really at a loss now. I do not have {$800.00} to get caught up and neither does the cosigner. I can pay the {$68.00} if I can get the income based payments. When I signed on originally I was told the payment was {$25.00} a month while in school and payments would be calculated once I graduated. One month they took {$25.00} and the next {$210.00} without warning or notice ( I was on automatic payments then ). 

I want a company where I can call and get solutions. Not rude customer service agents or advocates who ask me to change financials and then do not get approved. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I applied to refinance my home when I found out that CACH , LLC, has a lien against my home in my husbands name, that was filed in bankruptcy .We were discharged XXXX/XXXX/2013. this means they have been paid but wo n't take it off. The amount filed in bankruptcy was XXXX.I am not sure if you can help but maybe if you ca n't you can direct me to the right source. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Hi my bank account was basically stolen and is being withdrawed of a lot of money 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have an Home Equity ine with Wells Fargo , NA, since they acquired Wachovia Bank. Since the changes in FEMA 's Flood Insurance Maps, Wells Fargo has insisted that I obtain Flood Insurance on the property mortgaged. The requirement was for the amount of the lien against said property. Since last year, Wells Fargo has billed me for an excess of the amount of insurance they claim I require because their figures show a lien amount in excess of the amount of the Actual lien. I have called Wells Fargo on XXXX/XXXX/15 and this situation was supposed to be corrected. To date, Wells Fargo has not reversed the charge of {$740.00}. Today I have had to call Wells Fargo, NA., Insurance division again to try to settle this. I am of the opinion that I am not he only customer that Wells Fargo is trying to " extort '' this way and I feel that this should be looked into seriously. Wells Fargo has stated to me again that it will take 10 days for them to " research '' the lien and asked to be called back. They refused to send an e-mail or correspondence with an answer. Please help.Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The refuse to take any action to remove the fraudulent account. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I called into transunion in XXXX and spoke with a supervisor about XXXX XXXX accounts that I had that where due to come off my report. I told him that the open date and the date of first delinquency was wrong and according to my records, it was time for them to come off my report. The supervisor told me that if I called back in XXXX of 2016 and requested a supervisor to look at the accounts, they would remove them immediately. I was ok with this because it was only a few months. I called back today and requested a supervisor. I told him what I was told in XXXX and that I wanted them removed. He looked at the accounts and told me that because of the dates they have reported, it would be XXXX of this year before they would be removed. That is not what I was told and the dates of the accounts being opened are not the same as what they where when I called in XXXX. I think that is the reason why this supervisor said they wouldnt be removed for another 10 months now. There is also a collection associated with XXXX of these accounts that should be removed as well because of the dates of first delinquency. The accounts are XXXX with account number XXXX, XXXX with account number XXXX, XXXX with account number XXXX, and XXXX XXXX with account number XXXX. All XXXX XXXX accounts where opened on the same date and the last payment was made at the same time. This was over 7 years ago which means they should be removed according to the FCRA. I just want the accounts removed like they said they would do since it is past the time they should be reported. I do not want them disputed as I did that already and I think that is what caused the dates to moved and now I am having problems getting them removed. Transunion needs to honor what they say and remove all XXXX accounts since again, they are past the time that they should be reporting. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Submitted modification application in XXXX to my mortgage company Ditech. I have place numerous call and sent email to obtain my status and nothing. I received constant runaround all the while the clock is ticking and I am falling further behind with my payments. It seems as though the company is trying to reach foreclosure as they are certainly not trying to help me with this process. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My loan documents clearly state that as the loan was opened with a primary loan there are no annual fees, This is at least the 3rd time now that Santander Bank attempts to charge me a {$50.00} fee which then causes me to have to spend hours explaining to them that my loan should not have a fee. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have worked for the same employer and have recently become XXXX and I am collecting Social Security XXXX. I have been denied loan modification on 5 occasions since XXXX 2015. The 1st because I was current with my payments and was told I needed to be 3 months behind to qualify. 2nd, after falling behind 3 months denied due to NOT being current. The 3rd denial was due to " not making trial payments on a internal modification offer. '' The modification offer was on the last XXXX pages of a booklet which instructed me to fill out firms which were already received by the mortgage company. There was no reference to any modification being included in the packet. I did not thoroughly read through the entire packet and resent the forms that I previously sent, which were the same forms the packet requested. After sending the firms, again, I followed up, and to my surprise, was told about the " modification offer ''. I went through the packet and found it on the last XXXX pages. The offer was the same interest rate and the mortgage being extended to 40 years. Although I was in financial difficulty, the offer would have saved a minimal amount of money and I felt it would only hurt my situation in the long run, knowing my XXXX. I called to discuss with my assigned rep. ( Whose name I have ), and was told I did have to accept the modification offer and by not accepting, it would allow my loan to be reviewed again for other, more helpful, modification offers. Within a week, I received a notice that I was denied for " not making the trial modification payments. '' After the 3rd denial, each time I was asked for the same documents multiple times. Each time I sent documents, through email, fax, and USPS. I have proof that all documents were received, including a documents from my account page on the mortgage company website, that states all forms required were received and the modification was being reviewed. 
I knew I was being pushed aside by the mortgage company, that for some reason was working very hard to not help me with the modification but I thought at some point they would have to make me a offer if I hung in there and kept giving them what they were asking for. After the 5th denial in 1 year and do n't know where to turn. I have a wife and XXXX children and have drained my savings and feel my hands are tied. I have always worked and provided for my family. I feel the modification were being encouraged for people in my situation, if not who would they possibly be for. 
I would greatly appreciate any help you can offer. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law