AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: XXXX credit card. I use this card to buy a XXXX last XXXX XXXX $ in XXXX. When I pay it use this card, I choose 6 month no interest, buy I keep minimal payment each month. After 6 months I send a check XXXX $ pay out all expense, but it come out late fee on my statement every month, till XXXX $ last statement after wife write a check pay another XXXX {$.00} 50 {$.00} XXXX $ total more than XXXX {$.00} because she just following the statement wrote another check payout all balance. This month, the statement come to my hand, I found this mis-statement with another 187 {$.00} they still keep count late fee and interest on 0 spend and o balance. the XXXX $ was count from my XXXX purchase plus late fees and interest from every month that should not charge ( I did 6 month no interest with minimal payment plus payout check XXXX $ ), but they just simply ignore all payment even over paid. I just want them to pay me back and close my account, and ask you to do an investigation to shut down their business in case they continue to steal money from people. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Thru a company called XXXX XXXX XXXX, they negotiated an amount that was smaller than what was owed to XXXX or XXXX XXXX XXXX and I was able to pay off the agreed upon amount in XXXX payments in XX/XX/XXXX in the time stipulated. I also received new credit cards from XXXX XXXX XXXX with the account numbers that were never activated or used that I still have in my possession attached to the Visa Signature package that indicate previous account ending XXXX new account ending in XXXX valid thru XXXX. Payments were received, no new transactions took place an no payments were returned unpaid. This was clearly an entrapment to void the agreement and when this did not occur they decided to wait in hopes that I would not have documents to prove what actually took place. 
I received a summons in XXXX XX/XX/XXXX indicating that the balance of the original amount was due thru the law company of XXXX, XXXX LLC representing XXXX XXXX XXXX who apparently bought the loan from XXXX. I believe under FDCPA my rights have been violated by deceptive and false misrepresentation with regards to modifying the card number to collect a debt that was agreed upon previously. I have provided the relevant information in the allotted time and the above mentioned lawyers are still pursing this thru the court system despite the fact that I received a letter from XXXX XXXX XXXX indicating that they may report the account as charged off to reporting agencies. How can XXXX company accept a payment, then a second company buys the debt and comes after you again. I believed that this debt was paid in full and should not have to go thru this anguish with these large corporations with millions behind them. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: I start making payments to XXXX XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/2012 to XXXX/XXXX/2015 on time for the amount of {$100.00} a month, and XXXX funding they said that already report all payments on time but is not in my credit report I want Experian credit bureau to credit my report pay as agreed for all payments I have made ontime to XXXX XXXX.This account was charge off by XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was given a message on my job that a man called to talk to me named XXXX XXXX and I was given his phone number. I called him and asked him who he was and he said he could not help me until he knew my name. i said XXXX XXXX. He asked what phone number he called. I said I do n't know what phone number you called, I just got a message to call you. Who are you? What kind of business is this. He proceeded to become very rude and belligerent saying he ca n't help me if I ca n't tell him the phone number. I said I told you I do n't know who you called. He said he had no one by that name and again stated he ca n't help me without a phone number and said call me when you get it and hung up on me. His phone number is XXXX and the name of the company is Critical Resolution Mediation. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/2015, a caller who identified herself as XXXX XXXX from Performant Recovery, called the CEO and the Chief Technology Officer of my employer. XXXX of these company leaders are based in XXXX and in separate offices, identifying herself as being from Performant and asked whether I was working. XXXX officers informed the caller such calls were not allowed at work and that the caller should make any calls on a non-work number ( i.e. a personal number ). 

On XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/2015, a caller who identified herself as XXXX XXXX from Performant Recovery XXXX called the New Hampshire office of my company. In the XXXX of the XXXX calls, she left a detailed phone message with the office that included identifying herself as a debt collector. A XXXX call was made from this number XXXX hours later, XXXX. 

Prior to the XXXX XXXX violations, repeated hang-up calls have been made to the New Hampshire office of my employer from XXXX. In several instances, a XXXX telephone number, XXXX, has also made hang-up calls to the New Hampshire office of my employer moments later after the XXXX hang-up calls from the phone number ending in XXXX. 

Since the XXXX XXXX violation, robo and/or hang-up calls from the XXXX have been coming in daily ( including Saturdays now XXXX to the New Hampshire office of my company. 

Note : on XXXX XXXX, I mailed notice to Performant via certified mail with return receipt requested to 1. demand they stop calling my place of employment and 2. put them on notice they have violated FDCPA plus similar consumer protection laws in Massachusetts and New Hampshire XXXX 

I mailed a copy of my letter to Performant to the Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protection office XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX as well as mailed copies to the appropriate enforcement agencies in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: i do not recognize this information this is a fraudulent account that needs to be removed asap as it was opened as a result of identity theft 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank of America sent me a letter in XXXX XX/XX/XXXX stating they reached an agreement with the Federal government and through this program they have forgiven part of my loan and that the forgiveness would be effective XXXX XXXX. The letter also stated that even if I was selling my house or paying the loan in full, I was still eligible for the forgiveness as long as the sale or payoff was completed after the forgiveness was processed. I call Bank of America shortly after receiving this letter and was told and assured by a Bank of America staff member that the forgiven part of my loan would be effective and processed on XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX We are selling our house and we set our escrow closing date after this date based on the information provided by Bank of America. Shortly after XXXX XXXX, our escrow requested a payoff from Bank of America and was given the original payoff amount. I called to find out why the payoff was n't reduced and the Bank of America staff member told me it still had n't processed but that I was n't eligible because I was selling my house. I spoke to her supervisor and was told the same thing. XXXX staff members told me that Bank of America is not in the business of giving away money and that my loan did n't qualify for the forgiveness because I was selling my house and not maintaining my loan with Bank of America. After I read the letter I received from Bank of America to them, they advised me they would have to research the issue but could take up to a week to get an answer. Finally, they agreed that my loan was eligible for the forgiveness after numerous followup phone calls and that my loan forgiveness would be processed by XXXX XXXX and that there was nothing they could do to expedite the processing. I called back to get help from another department that works with the Department of Justice and was told my loan was set to be processed by XXXX XXXX. Now it is the end of XXXX and they are telling me that ca n't give me a date it will be processed. I have been mislead and lied to by several Bank of America staff members and due to their processing delay the buyers of my home are threatening a potential law suit and the sellers of the home we are buying are threatening to cancel the sale if this issue does n't get resolved quickly. The delay, lack of response and misinformation by Bank of America has put me and the parties involved in the sale of our house in a financial bind. We need my loan forgiveness processed immediately before further expenses are incurred and the possible cancellation and law suit if this processing delay continues. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Upon receiving my credit report, I noticed many inaccurate reports that had primarily been reported by Experian. I am seeking all ways to have this report corrected. This is just another tool in this attempt. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Hello, I 'm suppose to receive the Frank Dodd XXXX every year XXXX more years. 
This program includes the incentive rewards for borrowers who have received a permanent home loan modification and pay their mortgage on time every month. 
A borrower should receive annual principal reduction payments in the amount of $ XXXX contacted customer service several times and they are useless. Nobody can give me a straight answer. Last year I received the incentive reward with great difficulty, but this year nothing has been received. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In 2013, I lost my wallet in which my bank card was enclosed. Fraudulent activity occured on my account which placed my bank account in jeopardy. Filed a police report, stating my card was lost and that someone had charged my card in the amount of {$2800.00} dollars through credit. Notified BOA ( Bank of America ) of the transaction and submitted reference number from police report. Eventually my claim was accepted and BOA brought my balance back to {$0.00} or the amount that I had on my account orginally. My account was closed. Attempted to open up another account and BOA refused and told be to notify the consumer credit bureau under FDIC. Attempted to open up an account with XXXX Bank but they refused also. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Last week I applied for a used car loan at my financial institution, USAA. I asked for a loan up to {$15000.00} but also told the loan processer at USAA that I hoped I would need a loan for less than $ 15K after we finished negotiations on the car. I was quoted a rate of 2.75 % for this loan. 
After concluding negotiations with the owner of the vehicle for the sale at {$13000.00}, I gave the owner my personal check for {$1000.00}, so the remainder needed for a loan was {$12000.00}. I called USAA to execute the loan, but was told that for any amount less than $ 15K, the interest rate would be higher than 2.75 %. Because of the higher rate, I complained and spoke to several different people in USAA 's loan department, resulting in rates quoted from 4.75 % down to 3.2439 %. They still refused to give me the rate originally quoted of 2.75 %, even though I have a screen printed from their website showing the 2.75 % rate for my loan. They claimed that if I would take the $ 15K ( or higher amount ) loan, I could still get the 2.75 % rate, but for any lesser amount, the rate would be higher. This makes no sense at all, since their risk for a smaller loan amount is less than with the larger loan amount. 

This is nothing more than a classic " bait-and-switch '' tactic. If this was a disreputable loan shark, I might understand their tactic, but for USAA, I did n't expect such dishonorable and dishonest behavior. They should be prosecuted for their " bait-and-switch '' tactic to the fullest extent of the law. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I was injured at work in XX/XX/XXXX and XXXX took over. I had surgery done on XX/XX/XXXX, and all my medical bills were to be paid by XXXX. They are charging me rather than the Insurance company. I have sent XXXX all the debts outstanding and they promised to pay but they are still delinquent on my credit reports. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Letters threatening to sue on a fraudulent debt alleging I owe a XXXX year old credit card debt from an original creditor ( XXXX XXXX Bank ). I 've never had an account with this company. The debt is time barred. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company, XXXX XXXX XXXX, filed a small claims lawsuit against me for money owed to them, and won a judgment. They then hired someone, XXXX XXXX XXXX, to collect this for them. I have the written agreement between XXXX and me, the paid receipt from XXXX, copies of my cleared checks front and back. XXXX was to have XXXX XXXX file a satisfaction of judgment upon receipt of payment, and remove the items from my credit report. To date, this item is still reflected open on my Experian and XXXX credit reports, and no satisfaction of judgment has been filed with the court. I can not seem to get this updated anywhere. I have filed disputes with XXXX and XXXX, sent both of those credit reporting agencies, copies of the agreement, the paid receipt and front and back copies of my cleared checks, and all they do is ask the courthouse if this item is still open and then they tell me that they have verified the debt and it is still open. Which is what the court would say because the satisfaction of judgment has never been filed. I need these items removed from my XXXX and XXXX credit reports, as they have been paid and satisfied. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: To Whom It May Concern, In XXXX, I wrote a formal letter to the XXXX main credit bureaus Equifax, Transunion and Experian requesting them to close an investigation for disputed items on my credit. I requested them to remove the " DISPUTE REMARKS '' from my credit report since the investigation has taken over 90 days. 

I am attaching a copy of my credit report, SSN card and a copy of my driver 's license for reference. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have attempted to set up an auto payment on my credit card through the bank of America at least XXXX times over the past two years. I finally set up a minimum payment auto pay for {$130.00} monthly for one year via phone payment center ; I set up alerts on my online account and was never notified that the minimum payment set up given to me was not the correct amount due ; I have been charged a late fee for several months and despite calling in my payments, I am still being charged late fees. I believe the web auto pay is set up to make if impossible to use, the phone system is apparently worse, I have been deceived about the amounts due for my minimum payment ; I have been restricted from using the on line billing auto payment and I believe this is all done to defraud consumers. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Was subject to credit card fraud. BankAmerica closed the account and sent out a card for a new account. The new card was sent to someone else at a different address. Then they were supposed to send it to me at my office. Again they sent it to the wrong address. At no time was a signature required. I paid the balance ( not including the disputed amount ) in full on time. They could n't manage to post that to the new account. But they had no trouble moving over the balances owed. When this was brought to their attention, they agreed they got the payment and would move it over. But they would not issue a corrected statement to me. Claimed they could n't. And if they could they could n't email or fax it to me. Prior to BankAmerica buying XXXX it was able to do these sorts of things. After being put on hold for 30 minutes XXXX different times, I finally spoke to XXXX XXXX who claims she is the head of their service center and she reports to no XXXX outside of the chief corporate officers of BankAmerica. She again refused to send me a corrected statement showing the payments I had made. To say the least I will be closing my BankAmerica credit card and will find XXXX that has no connection whatsoever with BankAmerica. Not that I expect customer service anywhere else to be any better. Are n't we glad all of these banks are too big to fail. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In 2008 I attended XXXX University in XXXX off XXXX and XXXX while attending XXXX University I was only known of the XXXX XXXX loans I had. While going to the school they kept telling me I did not have enough money to continue that I had to keep taking out loans just to continue. Right before I graduated they told me I did n't have enough money to XXXX that I had to take out another loan before I can XXXX an at that time is when I found out I had a XXXX lending loan. Then after XXXX i ask for my XXXX to find out they took more then XXXX loan out on the same day at the same time. I also find out that they XXXX about how much money my XXXX will cost it was suppose to cost about XXXX an when i XXXX it was almost XXXX. I was also suppose to XXXX after XXXX years and i did n't XXXX till about XXXX years. Then after XXXX and continuing XXXX i was told i can continue with my XXXX even if i had a XXXX record and it withhold of adjudication. well I just found out that i wasted my time at XXXX and XXXX college In XXXX to get my XXXX and almost my XXXX and XXXX wont even let me withdraw when i told them my situation. Even though they said i am not even suppose to be certified but they still wont withdraw me. I told genesis lending of my situation but they wont drop the loan. I do n't feel I need to pay any loans because it was more then what i was told and I was lied to just so they can get money I wasted my time when I could of went to XXXX for something else. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: I have requested on several occasions on all XXXX credit reports for XXXX XXXX account to be removed off XXXX, Experian, and XXXX. Last deliquency date was XX/XX/XXXX and this company is still reporting charge off and also has sold account as of XX/XX/XXXX to XXXX and now this company is showing collections account and date opened in XX/XX/XXXX. I have also requested on several occasions to a XXXX agencies to correct this information as well. This should also reflect actual date but instead they are using a more recent date to effect my credit for a longer period. Please remove XXXX XXXX account and correct dates on XXXX XXXX. This should not remain on my report longer than 7 year period. Thank you. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX State filed judgement of {$18000.00} on XXXX/XXXX/2015. After our accountant provided them information why we did not owe this amount, XXXXState cancelled this assessment. See attached notice from XXXX State. However, they did not report the cancellation of this assessment/judgement. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: RIDICULOUS I CANT BE HAVIN PEOPLE CALLIN ME AND TELLING THINGS THAT DO NOT EVEN BELONG TO ME. AND ON TOP OF EVERYTHING THEY REPORTING ON MY CREDIT. SO I SENT A NOTICE SAYING TO STOP. THEY STILL DOIN IT 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: For the past 2 years, I have disputed XXXX accounts in particular that only appear on Experian tradelines. These creditors or debt collectors have not complied with the FDCPA and Experian keeps falsely reporting these items as verified items. Today, I spoke with CS Rep. XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX. On the automated system, it reflects when I put in XXXX XXXX personal identifiers {$0.00} past due and {$0.00} balance. I spoke to XXXX and told her there is a open investigation concerning this account on Experian. She told me that the account was settled out. But when I asked for the date of settlement, she said there was a balance of {$2800.00}. XXXX. She was then asked if XXXX will be collecting on this balance, she replied, " XXXX XXXX XXXX is not collecting on debt but reserves the right to send it to collection. She will be sending in the mail to my mailing address any information concerning this false account. 
I also spoke with XXXX in house recovery dept representative XXXX. I gave XXXX XXXX person identifiers and was told there was a open balance of {$250.00}. He was demanded to send all information concerning account in writing to my mailing address. He refused to do so, although I gave him XXXX XXXX personal identifiers. XXXX refuses to verify debt and EXPERIAN refuses my request to delete tradeline. 
Also XXXX XXXX has cease in its collection efforts to collect on a XXXX Credit card that did not belong to me. I made a complaint to CFPB against XXXX XXXX XXXX who falsely filed a judgment and is only reporting their tradeline on EXPERIAN. Their response was unsatifactory and disputed. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: They have repossessed our car and auctioned it off. We get many calls a day. They were sent a notice and still keep calling. Each time we talk they say they will keep calling till we pay. I am XXXX and on XXXX. We do not have enough to pay our regular bills. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My daughters account keeps on getting charged an overdraft fee on her account. They claim when Internet transaction is made it is not debit the day of the transaction. They also state that the merchant has up to XXXX days to submit there debit to get paid. The bank never puts a hold on the transaction and subsequently charges an overdraft fee. They also say that they ca n't tell me who the Internet transaction is from until it is completed. When I complained that XXXX was unauthorized to debit the account they took there time to investigate RIDICULOUS. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian.com offers {$1.00} credit report. Purchased on a mobile device, the XXXX day " trial '' terms and monthly subscription fees are hidden and true service costs are deceptive. XXXX days after signup, they have billed for a {$21.00} monthly credit watch subscription service. I called to dispute the service and the charges and was refunded {$21.00}. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response