AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: Experian is continuing to report outdated information on my credit reports which violates the FCRA. Accounts are over seven years old, or have been more than seven years since any activity. 
XXXX acct # XXXX no activity since XX/XX/XXXX XXXX account # XXXX car was voluntarily reposed in XX/XX/XXXX all of the above accounts are past the statute of limitations ( XXXX ), but experian has still not removed the items from my report and they continue to report as current delinquent accounts. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was given a reverse mortgage with Bank of America and applied for a loan mode that they approved six months later after I mailed all paymnets on time they said my loan mode paper work was lost and I am being forclosed. I turned to my lawer to stop it and while we are waiting for court Bank of America turned around and sold my account to XXXX XXXX mortgate before we had a chance to go to court in XXXX XXXX. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: They call at least 20-30 times a day, using the following phone numbers : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, and never leave a message. This disturbs my work time often. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: It is too long of a story. Suffice to say that XXXX bank took 7 months processing our modification request for an non-owner mortgage modification then denied us in XXXX XXXX because the house was not owner-occupied though we applied under the rules for a non-owner occupied. 

We reapplied using XXXX XXXX ... cost of {$2500.00} after spending {$400.00} from a lawyer whor recommended their free service..from XXXX Washington in XXXX XXXX, who submitted a XXXX plus page modification package XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. But XXXX did not tell Northwest Trustee Services to postpone the sale that was scheduled in XXXX for Friday, XXXX XXXX. Nor did XXXX inform NWTS that they had received a modification package. XXXX then received update document XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. Yet instead of informing NWTS to postpone the sale, they transferred the loan to XXXX in late XXXX. XXXX nor XXXX sent us a letter 30 days in advance of this transfer as required. Now XXXX will not inform NWTS of the modification papers. And NWTS knows of the modification papers because they have responded to parkview services acknowledging the prior XXXX file XXXX and now the new file under XXXX XXXX. But they have not postpone the sale date, as required by law. 

Unless something occurs according to what NWTS and XXXX must do according to law, I will need to to file under bankruptcy protection laws to protect my asset. {$2000.00} 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This company Midwest Recovery has violated FDCPA policy, they reported a collection to my credit report with out contacting me about this debt, they did not give me the Rights to fight! when I ask to send me the documents they could not provide the right address..now I have a collection for a fraudulent account, 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have multiple promo rate balances, at different rates and expiring at different times. The last XXXX statements, beginning with my XXXX statement, Bank of America stopped reporting the balance owed under each promo rate plan. I called customer service after the XXXX statement and was told it was probably just a glitch, as they had just switched over their system. Today, I chatted them online, and they told me their new policy is that they " no longer include the balances for the promotional offers on our statements. '' I informed them I believed that was illegal, and I would contact CFPB. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: i have a payment arrangement set up with Kay Jewelers, we have been making reduced payments in accordance with the arrangement. we have been getting XXXX calls since XX/XX/2016 saying that we have not paid. this information is not true and has been verified with Kay jewelers every time we have spoken with them. Their phone dialer system has called my self and my wife a minute apart and we have spoken with them at the same time and have figured out that the nature of the calls is false. i have repeatedly informed them that if calls continue i will file harassment charges against them. today XXXX/XXXX/16 we have received 4 phone calls back to back from them after hanging up with a representative who has been informed that i am taking action against them 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: I applied for a Wells Home Equity Line of Credit to conduct home improvements on XXXX XXXX, 2015. I was approved for a credit limit of up to {$30000.00} on XXXX XXXX, 2015. During the process, I considered seeking a higher credit limit, but was informed by Wells that I could always raise the limit later on if necessary. After the Home Equity Line of Credit was approved, I learned that my anticipated renovations would cost more than expected. Accordingly, I returned to Wells to obtain a higher credit limit. It was only then that I was told by Wells that New York State law allegedly prohibits Wells from increasing the original credit limit on a Home Equity Line of Credit. At no time did Wells inform me of this limitation when I sought the original line of credit. Indeed -- Wells ' representations were the opposite -- that I could always raise my line of credit if necessary. This false representation was a significant motivating factor in my decision to obtain the original line of credit. Now, however, I have been told by Wells that in order for me to obtain a higher line of credit, I must first close the existing Line of Credit and apply for a brand new Line of Credit with a higher limit. This process will cost me over {$800.00}, and Wells has refused to waive the additional service charges and closing costs. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Submitted multiple complaints that all were decided in the consumers favor as Navy Federal continues to disregard original guidance and decisions from CFPB. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I financed repairs to be done to bring my property up to standards through a XXXX loan and the contractor I chose and who was approved by the lender did not complete the work and did more damage than repairs. The lender was made aware of this XX/XX/2015. They were in control of my funds and released 1/2 of the funds to the contractor up front ; they allowed the contractor to exceed his contract due date. And, now they are saying I am in default, even though I have made all my mortgage payments. They are blaming me for the work being stopped for more than 30 days. 
In XXXX 2015, after allowing the contractor to exceed his 90 day contract, the the lender hired a HUD consultant. The HUD consultant stated that 85 % of the work was complete, regardless that it had not been completed in a workman like fashion and failed the final inspection. The lender since XX/XX/2015 insists on only allowing the remaining funds on the loan to cover a repair list provided by the same HUD consultant ; completely ignoring the bid of record which was given to the appraiser in XXXX 2015. 
They have refused to accept any other bids which now exceed the amount of funds left on the loan due to their allowing the contractor damage more than he repaired. They promised that " no matter what he does, we will get someone in there to finish, fix and repair. '' XX/XX/2015 the lender wanted me to allow the remaining loan funds be applied to the pr principle of the loan ; at the same time they were made aware that the new roof was now leaking into my brand new living room and the support beam etc. was not repaired. They have repeatedly threatened default taking their attorney 's fees out of the renovation funds as well. I have also spoken with the original appraiser and he stated not only did the ask for the appraisal and was given the report XXXX/XXXX/15, they then requested a completion inspection on XXXX/XXXX/15 ; the actual closing did not occur until XXXX/XXXX/15 and he sent correspondence asking if they were certain ; they insisted on an inspection ; he inspected and sent a report that none of the repairs had been completed. FHA and HUD have done a review at my asking ; at the time they were not aware of the appraisal issues ; but I have communicated my new findings to my contact in XXXX XXXX. The chief of HUD and the contacts at FHA have urged me to contact you and keep pursuing the issues through my attorney which is difficult because I am a single female and have limited funds ; the co-borrowers are my XXXX year old parents. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I recently reviewed my most recent Transunion. I observed several inquiries that are being displayed that I do n't recall giving the authorization or consent. I have made Transunion aware of this situation is XXXX 2016 and they continue to not conduct a proper investigation. Furthermore, I have informed Transunion that if the inquiries are found to be legitimate to please mail me the documents so that I can determine its validity. Transunion actions are having a negative impact on my credit worthiness and credit score by its failure to comply with the FCRA. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The new mortgage servicer, Speclialized Loan Servicing did not provide me with the required welcome letter. The law requires that borrower receive XXXX notices, XXXX from your original mortgage servicer, the other from the new servicer. Unless you received a written transfer notice at settlement, your current servicer must send you a " Dear Borrower '' letter at least 15 days before the effective date of the transfer, which would be when the first payment is due at the new servicer 's address. The second notice -- a so-called " welcome letter '' -- should come from the new servicer, which must notify you within 15 days after the effective date of the transfer. 
Moreover, Speclialized Loan Servicing is engaging in the prohibited practice of dual tracking while I 'm under review for a loan modification. I was under review with the prior servicer, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX and just prior to the transfer of Specialized Loan Servicing. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The new mortgage servicer, Speclialized Loan Servicing did not provide me with the required welcome letter. The law requires that borrower receive two notices, one from your original mortgage servicer, the other from the new servicer. Unless you received a written transfer notice at settlement, your current servicer must send you a " Dear Borrower '' letter at least 15 days before the effective date of the transfer, which would be when the first payment is due at the new servicer 's address. The second notice -- a so-called " welcome letter '' -- should come from the new servicer, which must notify you within 15 days after the effective date of the transfer. 
Moreover, Speclialized Loan Servicing is engaging in the prohibited practice of dual tracking while I 'm under review for a loan modification. I was under review with the prior servicer, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX and just prior to the transfer of Specialized Loan Servicing. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank of America account # XXXX I disputed this account in XXXX 2016 to all XXXX credit bureaus. XXXX and XXXX has fixed error. XXXX has not fixed the error. The account settled over a year ago in full. I have XXXX to prove it. This my final attempt with XXXX to fix it or I will be contacting a lawyer to handle this matter. This account was settled and should be CLOSED and have a XXXX balance. My case number with CFPB is XXXX. The XXXX confirmation numbers XXXX dated from XXXX XXXX, 2016 and XXXX XXXX, 2016 are # XXXX, # XXXX, # XXXX. This is the final dispute. If not fixed, I will hand it over to my lawyer. I am trying to fix this before I apply for a new car loan in XXXX 2016. Thanks. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, XXXX I filed a complaint with this Agency against Bank of America. See Case No. XXXX. 

Bank of America responded to that Complaint stating it was no longer the service of the Mortgage Loan effective XXXX XXXX, XXXX, further stating those servicing rights had been transferred to XXXX Loan Servicing, ( " XXXX '' ). The problem is Bank of America filed a foreclosure case against me on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, months after it sold its servicing rights to the loan at issue to XXXX. 

I know this because on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I filed a complaint against XXXX asking if and when it filed the foreclosure case, and three ( 3 ) times XXXX refused to respond to that question. See Case No. XXXX. Further, XXXX sent a representative to my home on XXXX XXXX, XXXX because XXXX had not heard from me. That representative informed me that XXXX had no knowledge of any pending foreclosure matter. XXXX sending a representative to my home was a clear indication in and of itself that XXXX had no knowledge of the foreclosure proceeding. 

XXXX stated it halted the foreclosure process on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. See XXXX, XXXX Response at p. XXXX. However the foreclosure attorney continues to proceed in court even after XXXX halted the process indicating Bank of America is still controlling the process, not XXXX. 

This is outright fraud. I demand an investigation as to why and how Bank of America filed a foreclosure case against me long after it sold its right to do so to another servicer. 
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: while travelling my accounts at bank of america were closed. 

No reason was given. 

Uncertain if the rest of money will be returned. Luckily i had stopped using the account and had transferred most out of it because the atm card kept having difficulty while travelling. 

There was less than {$1000.00} in the account, however I worry about my reputation on credit reporting agencies reports since they noted in their letter they could report to XXXX about account closure. Can you help clarify this problem, never bounced check, had no problems except someone deposited a check while my husband and were overseas but the bank accepted it even though they put wrong address on deposit slip and it was deposited out of state. That happened over 3 months ago and we thought the matter was settled. 

XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I get repeated calls from Open Road Lending and I do n't have any loan accounts with this agency. Please stop the calls 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: The XXXX account # XXXX is showing a negative 30 day mark on my credit report for XXXX. I have called them to dispute this multiple times as I was not aware that a payment had not processed. As previously stated to them, this was set up on auto pay with my XXXX account, NOT home depo, and for whatever reason did not get to them. When I was notified, I immediately paid the account and it is even paid in full/off. XXXX XXXX had very good customer service and understood what happened, they refunded all the fees and late fees associated with the error. I appreciate that, however I do not feel this should have been reported on my credit report. I have talked to multiple representatives after, and they all advised that once reported they cant remove. They again proceed to say we updated everything on there end and credit me any fees, however I am disputing the 30 day late reporting on my credit report. I kindly ask you please remove or advise what next step I need to take as I strongly feel this was incorrectly reported. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My husband and I have Netspend Cards for our direct deposit from our jobs. From time to time, my husband will go to XXXX XXXX our banking institution and do a cash advance from our Netspend Cards to deposit funds into either our checking or savings account at XXXX XXXX. On XXXX/XXXX/16 my husband attempted to do a Cash Advance from our Netspend card to our XXXX XXXX Checking account, for whatever reason the transaction was NOT showing in XXXX XXXX, the Bank Teller even called the Branch Manager to make sure the funds were NOT there, and told XXXX he would need to contact Netspend to see what happened with the transaction. My husband spent hours on the phone with Netspend and finally the Supervisor told him " Not to worry, that the transaction has been cancelled ''. So today, XXXX/XXXX/16 I attempted to make a purchase with my Netspend card and the card was declined. I did n't think much of it, I thought more than likely they were having issues with their terminal. The card was declined again when I went to go buy lunch. My husband said I bet that {$800.00} transaction went through. I went to look at the XXXX XXXX XXXX to see if the {$800.00} was in there, it was not. So I signed on to the Netspend website and it shows the {$800.00} went through at XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/16, even though the supervisor assured my husband over and over that he cancelled the transaction. So I called Netspend to clear up the mess, and specifically asked for a supervisor. The 1st time I called the agent tried to assist me and told me the money is in XXXX XXXX. I told him it is not, my husband just got off the phone with them and there is no pending transactions and it is not in our account. I asked for a supervisor and after waiting on hold for 20 mins the phone just rang and rang. I hung up and called back and immediately asked for a supervisor. XXXX claimed to be a Floor Supervisor and I told him the situation and again I was told XXXX XXXX has the money. I again told him XXXX XXXX does NOT have my money. My husband just got off the phone with them and there are no pending transactions and the money is not showing in my account. I told him I looked on my mobile app, as well as my husband just got off the phone with a supervisor. I asked to speak with someone higher and XXXX told me if I do n't like what he has to say then hang up. After going back and forth with him about the money being in XXXX XXXX and I offered to email him my XXXX XXXX Transactions so he can see for himself XXXX said I am lying that the money is in my account. I hung up and called back and spoke with a Supervisor named XXXX who again gave me the same run around as XXXX. I do n't know what game this company is playing, but they do n't want to take responsibility for their mistakes and there seems to be no accountability. They have no regard for their Customers and go as far as calling them liars. I do n't know about them, but {$800.00} is a lot of money, that was my grocery money, gas money, and bill paying money that I no longer have. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Today, XXXX/XXXX/16, I received a XXXX XXXX card with my name on it, which was referred to as a prepaid XXXX card. It was from " netSpend '', XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, TX XXXX. I did not request the card and have never heard of the company/bank which claims to be FDIC. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: After becoming aware that XXXX accounts had been placed on my credit report by this agency, I contacted the agency requesting verification of this debt. The information provided by the agency did not include any information positively associating me with this debt, nor had I visited the associated facility or received any of the medical services associated with this debt. Between XXXX - XXXX, I made multiple attempts to dispute this claim, both with the agency directly as well as XXXX & XXXX. The agency deleted XXXX account but validated XXXX remaining accounts while failing to provide me with any documentation substantiating this debt. On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I contacted the agency again disputing the remaining XXXX accounts and asking that the debts either be validated or deleted from my account.On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I contacted the agency again after notating that the collections were still reporting to the credit bureaus. After being told by the initial representative that the dispute was placed with the Dispute Department on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, this was later given denied by the dispute representative and he asked for me to give the agency more time to validate the dispute. I refused this request in accordance with my legal rights and asked that the issue be resolved by close of business today. The representative informed me that he would need at least 3 business days.This false reporting has negatively impacted my credit score adversely affecting my ability to qualify for a home and car loan during this 180+ days.. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response