AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I got a copy of my credit report an learned that a collection agency has the same debt listed on it XXXX with different account numbers and different amounts and more than what I actually owe the creditor I did business with. The debt is for an old utility account I that closed and I did not get in the final bill in the mail because I moved. I called the collection agency and they said they would investigate my concern about them listing the same bill twice and get back to me however they never did. I went to the utility company for the original bill and paid it in full and I want the collection agency to correct their reporting on all XXXX of my credit reports. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, 2014 Paypal " limited '' XXXX of my accounts with them, which is a friendly way of saying they locked the money in them and wo n't give me access to it. Although they refused to explain why they did this, they did tell me that my money would be available 180 days after they " limited '' my accounts. Now that 180 days has passed they 're still not letting me withdraw my money. I have {$1000.00} locked away in XXXX account and {$990.00} locked away in the other account. Can you send them a friendly reminder to follow their own terms and conditions and release my funds to me? 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: The Mortgage company has omitted some of our mortgage payments for the last two years and they are trying to foreclose on us tomorrow. We, need help to hold the Mortgage Company liable for misappropriating your mortgage payments. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I believe the debt not to be mine as the apartment manager claimed I could move out and as long as they re-rented the apartment there would no problem. I know they quickly re-rented it. Yet they are trying to collect {$3000.00} on damages? How do they come up with that number. They say after insurance I owe {$750.00}. Plus a XXXX collection for {$3900.00}. Its all fee 's. 
I was medically ordered to move from the location, I have a doctors note as well as my personal statement attached. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My husband and an XXXX filed bankruptcy in XX/XX/XXXX. We had a home equity line of credit with Bank of the West and the borrower was the XXXX, my husband and me. Bank of the West was notified by the courts and our attorney. The billing continues to be sent in the name of the XXXX, even after I sent them copies of the bankruptcy notice. I called the bank the end of XX/XX/XXXX and they said they would change the name on the billing notice to my name since I did not file bankruptcy or not send notices to us at all. This process took about 4 years to complete. If a Chapter XXXX bankruptcy was discharge and the debt was not reaffirmed, can they send notices? The XXXX was no longer a viable company 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a Bank of America account in 2009 and some one got a hold of my checks and over drafted my account by over {$1700.00}. Bank of America refused to do anything about it and I refused to pay it so it went into collections. XXXX acquisitions had it first so I hired XXXX to have it removed and XXXX in turn did remove it off of my credit report but turned around and sold it to XXXX XXXX XXXX. So we disputed it again and it came off my report again, however it now got sold to XXXX. We are disputing this for a XXXX and hopefully last time 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a Macy 's AmEx. Yesterday I received an unsolicited issue of XXXX magazine. The mailing label said " Macys American Ex '' and listed my address ( not my name ). Immediately preceding " Macys American Ex '' was the password to my Macy 's account ( which has since been changed )! So not only did Macy 's not keep my password private within the company, it sent it to the magazine publisher and through the USPS! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am a victim of identity theft. I do not owe for this debt. A representative from Credit Collection Services continuously called me and harassed me, and told me I will be arrested if I do n't take care of this debt. Credit Collection Services is in violation of the Minnesota Debt Collection laws and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I opened a Bank of America account in XXXX for {$25.00} and was going to use it as a backup account. I had forgotten, until today when I received a statement from them showing I owed {$23.00}. Having never used the account I was curious what occurred. I called and they informed me the per the terms and conditions they fee 'd the account several times. I asked them to reverse the fees and close the account. They refused. I believe this is happening to XXXX of other citizens I spoke with XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX on XXXX XXXX. The stated the account had been access an {$11.00} fee XXXX times and I had gone from a positive balance of {$25.00} to a negative balance of {$23.00} and per the terms and conditions they could and would continue to fee the account. This means they made {$48.00} from an account with no activity. Again, this practice I feel is highly deceptive unles you read the XXXX point font on their XXXX page agreement you will find that they will fee you. That information needs to be very clear at the front and they should notify their customers if and when they would ever access a fee of this type giving them the opportunity to close the account or fund it to a level that would be adequate. This was never done. I 'm sure Bank of America is earning XXXX from this policy which becomes a tax, especially on low income earners. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am a victim of identity theft and I do not owe for this debt. A representative from Capital Management Services , LP continuously called me back and informed me that the FBI would arrest me and I would not be able to get and bank loan or federal student loan from the government ever again, if I do n't pay this debt. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: To whom it may concern Checking my credit report the other day I found some items that I would like cleared up. 

First I 'd like to address the XXXX XXXX ... This was included in our Bankruptcy which was final XXXX XXXX 2013. I 'd like to have it removed from my Credit Report and considered dissolved under our Bankruptcy. 

Next ... 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is paid in full. This was supposed to be paid by our insurance Company but they did n't want to pay 100 % .We fought this and lost. 

Next ... 
XXXX This debt also was included in our Bankruptcy and I would appreciate if this item can be removed from my report. 

Next ... XXXX XXXX XXXX .... 
This Debt was paid off not by Bankruptcy! We paid this off all the way to the final Payment. No Bankruptcy Discharge on this debt. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XX/XX/2015 I submitted a FULLY VALID check ( convenience check with plenty of available balance ) to a grocer and it was sent to collections erroneously as a " returned check '' because they did n't process the check properly. The debt collector it was sent to lied to me, stating they sent me a notice XX/XX/2015 about this check being " returned ''. I never received that letter and they sent me a " copy of the letter '' ( dated XXXX XXXX when they sent it after I called, not XX/XX/2015 ), when I discovered the error on my credit report. The bank on which the check was drawn NEVER RECEIVED the check and thus could not have returned it. I have that letter in writing from that bank proving it was never received, thus not returned. Now my credit scores have plummeted, and is marked as a collection. Just today on XXXX XXXX it is saying the collections were removed, but my score is still disgustingly low, and it has marred my standing for anyone looking at my report all this time. It is showing I wrote a " bad check '' when I did no such thing! My scores were " Excellent '' and now " Poor '' due to something I did not do, and the involved bank gets off scott free. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Citibank offers a yearly bonus of XXXX Elite Qualifying Miles on AAdvantage if you charge and pay more than {$40000.00} in a given year. In 2014 I exceeded that amount by almost 50 % yet they refuse to honor that bonus offer which, by the way, is still shown on their web site. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I signed up for a Small Business Checking account with U.S. Bank on or about XX/XX/XXXX with a E-Deposit limit {$10000.00} for daily deposits. On XX/XX/XXXX I attempted to make a deposit of {$2500.00} and the deposit was declined. I was told my limit was lowered to {$2500.00} XXXX without notice ) and now I am unable to deposit my check. I contacted customer service and spoke to XXXX tier customer support and was told " nothing could be done '' and that " it will not change ''. I have never have had a returned check, a bounced check or any negative account interaction. I maintain XXXX times the required minimum balance for the account. Calls to a regional manager XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX at XXXX are not returned. The nearest branch and/or atm is over XXXX miles away from our location to deposit our checks. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX I contacted the B of A because I am trying to refinance my XXXX mortgage and have a lien on my property for XXXX. The Lien is actually in the name of California XXXX XXXX as it was a down payment assistance program. Bank of America has the loan ( Loan # XXXX ) and sends me a statement every month with a XXXX balance. This loan was discharged in a Bankruptcy discharge on XXXX Case # XXXX. On XXXX I asked Bank of America for a lien release on this loan. They told me it was still an active loan, I explained it was discharged in a chapter XXXX BK and asked to speak to a supervisor, they would not let me be transferred and then opened a research case on XX/XX/XXXX told me it would be XXXX days. I called every day to see if there were any notes or resolution which there were none. I called yesterday and XXXX told me there are notes on the loan from the research team but that he did n't understand what they are saying so he opened a case again and told me to call back in XXXX hrs. I have not received any phone calls from the research team or any letters. I now have XXXX business days to complete my refi. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I brought a XXXX debit card. I loaded XXXX on the card. At XXXX. I tried to activate the card.and was told I ca n't activate becuase there is a restriction on account. Representative said she will send a email to have it removed in 4 hrs. The next day I called to check on the status is the Restriction. The automatic machine allow me to complete activation. XXXX I finish it said my balance was XXXX. I asked customer service, they said it was a debit for XXXX i owed net spend from XX/XX/XXXX I have filed bankruptcy in XX/XX/XXXX and it was discharged. Also I do n't understand how I owe money on a pre paid card. When I asked for proof of debt they said they do n't have it. And to be honest the last time I hand net spend was in XX/XX/XXXX. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have had my identity stolen. The Experian dispute processing is not consumer friendly. You can not dispute online, ( as soon as you select " identity theft '' as the cause for your dispute, the system prevents you from submitting and demands you call their XXXX number ). Once you call the listed XXXX number, there are NO options to talk to someone or report identity theft. It directs you BACK to the website. 

I had to submit the dispute as a 'regular ' dispute and indicate identity theft in the comments and provided supporting documents. The dispute result took only XXXX hours, and they declined to acknowledge the dispute as valid, and the fraudulent activity remains on my credit report. 

I have had the SAME issue with XXXX, but the results took longer than XXXX hours. XXXX is the ONLY bureau to actually assist me, and the only bureau to have human customer service agents on their XXXX numbers. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, 2015, CitiCard put a charge of XXXX on my credit card from XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX. I went online on XXXX XXXX and saw the charge on my credit card and called CitiCard and told them I did not make this purchase and I did not want them to pay it. They asked if I had ever bought from this company and I said I had but I did not authorize this purchase and I did not want them to pay it. 
I had previously agreed to an Autoship in 90 days in the amount of XXXX, with the right to cancel the Autoship. I cancelled the Autoship on XXXX XXXX, 2015. I never agreed to the XXXX XXXX, 2015 charge of XXXXXXXXCitiCards sent me a follow-up letter to which I responded. They asked for a copy of the order. Since I did not order anything, and this was an unauthorized charge, I did not have a copy of any order. They sent me a XXXX letter again asking for a copy of the order. I responded again telling them I did not place this order and did not have a copy of the order. Then they sent me a letter saying they had finished their investigation and I had not supplied what they had asked for so they were recharging my credit card for the XXXX The only thing they asked for was a copy of the order. Since I did not place this order, I do not have a copy of an order to send them. 
I had called the XXXX XXXX that made the fraudulent charge to my card and told them to remove the unauthorized charge. They said a mistake had been made and they had already sent merchandise and to return it unopened and they would issue a credit. I did not accept the package. It was left on my doorstep by the postman. I took the unopened package to the post office and returned it to the sender with a tracking number so I had proof it was returned. When the company did not issue a credit, I filed a complaint against them with the New Jersey Attorney General Consumer Affairs Division because the address was in New Jersey. After I filed the complaint with the New Jersey Attorney General, I tried to call the company but they did not answer their phone.. 
Citi advertises XXXX Liability for unauthorized charges. I did not agree to buy anything and I did not authorize this charge. I have sent CitiCards a notarized letter certifying that this was an unauthorized charge and asked them to remove the charge from my credit card. They have not removed the charge. 
I believe CitiCards has violated the law by trying to make me pay for a fraudulent charge I did not authorize, and because they have not honored their advertised XXXX Liability for unauthorized charges. They have now added late fees and interest to my card. I expect CitiCards to honor their guarantee and remove this charge and fees from my credit card. 
I am attaching copies of our correspondence, a copy of my notarized letter and a copy of my complaint to the XXXX Attorney General against the company that put the unauthorized charge on my credit card. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am a Bank of America customer. Approximately 5 years ago I requested for a home retention assistance from Bank of America. I was told several times that the amount owed would be placed on the back end of the loan. I started receiving notices that my loan was in the arrears and that it needed to be brought forward. The amount was never placed in the arrears and I can not get in front of the loan. I requested again for a home retention modification. This process was delayed repeatedly by Bank of America. Documents were requested by BOA and resent several times. My account was transferred to several account reps each time being asked for documents that were already sent. Loan took over 7 months to process. I was again informed that my arrears would be placed on the back end of the loan. I never received notice except for a phone call from XXXX XXXX that my loan modification was approved. I began making payments but then received notices that my loan was again significantly in the arrears. I started setting in bi-monthly payments at an amount that was more than what the new loan amount was for but was told this was not acceptable because I was placed in a " TRIAL '' program. When I inquired about this program I was told that I was only permitted to pay the exact amount that was due and not more, not less. My new account representative, XXXX XXXX, advised me that I was no longer in the trial program and that my loan was reverting back to the original amount owed because I was not complying with the " TRIAL '' program. I did not receive information on this trial program and was never informed of the terms of the program. 
The BOA refusal to place my outstanding owed amount in the back end of the loan has made it impossible for me to bring my loan current and has destroyed my credit scores. The reasons for requesting for a loan modification was to save my credit ratings but BOA has outright destroyed any and all hopes of rebuilding. I have been making payments that are larger than the amount due in an effort to bring the loan current but this can not happen. My payments are made ever two weeks yet BOA does not acknowledge the payments until the next payment is made. They collect the interest on this loan and also collect interest on the payment. 
I have called numerous times to no avail. I am making my payments and they continue to report negative entries on my credit scores. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I continue to dispute an invalid lien labeled under ID # XXXX with Transunion. My initial dispute was of XXXX invalid and prematurely placed liens in the public records section of my file and one was removed but not the other. These liens have been removed as they were joint liens with another indiviual who has since cleared and removed them from his reports as well. Yet, TransUnion keeps denying me a proper investigation and the proof of verification which I requested via certified mail, such as the descriptions and the procedures used to verify the liens that have since been removed from my file at the clerks office. They deny me any documentation and though they have deleted XXXX lien they refuse to remove the XXXX invalid one. XXXX has already deleted XXXX liens because they are unverifiable and no longer on record at the county clerks recorders office. So how does Transunion have the ability or the evidence to keep this lien on file when I have informed them many times that it needs to be deleted from my file and the public records section of my credit report with them. Please, can the government assist me in holding them accountable for denying me my right to an accurate credit report and a proper investigation? Transunion continues to ignore my correspondences and refuses to provide me proof and yet they deleted the other lien and XXXX deleted both. It is very hurtful and I have to spend so much money fighting them on this invalid and unverifiable lien on my record while the other bureaus remove them without hesitation. Please help me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I applied for a FHA/HUD loan with SWBC Mortgage, XXXX, TN. I submitted all paperwork and documentation to receive a pre-approval, GFE, and loan was sent to underwriting after submitting a letters and other documents to processor. I was called on XX/XX/XXXX by loan officer XXXX XXXX and was told that loan was denied because of statement in letter regarding " why '' I amended XX/XX/XXXX taxes. I stated it was the request of a former lender ( XXXX ) in which I did not close on foreclosed home. I scheduled a meeting with XXXX and his supervisor. I was informed that I was committing fraud and falsifying documents. I informed SWBC I did nothing wrong. I do not know anything about their industry as I am ignorant to the lender/mortgage industry. I 'm working on becoming a XXXX time homeowner. I did what the lender requested of me. I asked that they call FHA/HUD while in their presence to verify what was stated and amendment of taxes is illegal and verifiable reason for loan denial. Unfortunately, XXXX ( FHA/HUD customer service line ) stated only an underwriter can speak with HUD underwriters to get the information. Also, I requested the SWBC 's underwriter to send me documentation of the information as I may have to retain an attorney due to the implications of fraud ( me and/or lender ). I was told by XXXX supervisor that XXXX underwriters of SWBC have denied the loan. I 'm still awaiting the denial letter from SWBC Mortgage and the information from the underwriter that verifies I have committed fraud via FHA/HUD policies and they have the right to deny me the loan. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I do not owe this debt. I have rechecked my dates that I was covered by my parent 's policy with XXXX and verified with the insurance company that I was actually covered from XXXX not as what I had presumed of XXXX. I came of my parent 's policy in XXXX XXXX. 
On turning the age of XXXX, it became my secondary policy with XXXX and my primary was with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and part of my employment package in XXXX. 
All payments for health care services had been compensated for via insurance. I do not own any medical debts, I even had additional coverage in my employment package. Please note this to my prior entry I do not owe this debt. 
On turning the age of XXXX, it became my secondary policy and my primary was with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and part of my employment package in XXXX. 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I filed complaint against Bank of America refused to serve me a new credit card application because of overdraft history and bad credit records in their discrimination against American with Disabilities Act, so they do not interest in American with Disabilities Act 1990, Please relocate me to other bank institution what they denied my credit card application discrimination against XXXX XXXX XXXX from Bank of America. They do not want me applying a credit card with reward points that they do not like my appearance and XXXX issues. I complain against Bank of America that they insulted me in XXXX addresses that they denied my reward point with credit card application because of bad credit record and overdraft records. Report to US Senators and Speaker XXXX XXXX in charging serious requirement. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response