AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I have been paying my private school loans since XX/XX/XXXX. Never late, no problems. In XX/XX/XXXX, I lost my job and entered into a graduated extended repayment schedule with Access Group. At no time did they tell me it was only for 2 years with that repayment structure. During this time, Access Group sent my loans to be serviced with XXXX. XXXX has been a disaster from the start. They took away my repayment structure telling me the time had expired. Since that time, I have been having trouble making my monthly payments because I can not afford them. I get calls on my cell telling me I 'm late and threatening to report me to the credit burue said the time. I also receive emails from access group telling me to contact them to talk about my options on repayment. I call each time I get that email and then they tell me, there are no options. I do not understand how this company rather get paid zero than try and work something out so they can get paid something. People at this point have nothing to lose by not paying their loans. We have no property and our credit scores are shot either way! I feel that access group/XXXX do not care about the millions of people that want to pay, but they refuse to work something out. I am sure that in my lifetime, the bankruptcy laws will change to have this debt dissolved, and I will probably be amongst the first to do so if access group/XXXX does not step up and work payment plans with people. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a checking account and a savings account at metro credit union. XXXX XXXX XXXX is a member only bank. Not just anyone can open up an account the only way to do so is to add my ex boyfriend to My ex boyfriend to my savings account only so he would be able to open a checking account of his own. XXXX XXXX stated that he could open one and be a member if he was put on my savings. So thats exactly what we did. They never once mentioned that I would be responsible for any negativity on his accounts or loans. Eventually I wasnt with this exboyfriend anymore. I have an account from XXXX XXXX XXXX reported on my Experian credit report for {$2500.00}. I have no idea what this is or what it was for. It does have my account listed however. I have never recieved a bill for this. The credit report says its an installement loan. At that time I had direct deposit into my checking account. The bank however did tell me that I was unable to remove him off of my account because he had a negative balance on his checking account and even though he was on my savings that meant he was on my checking account as well even though he wasnt suppose to have his name on my checking account. The bank was going to take my money from me even if he had a loan that I had nothing to do with or even if he had a negative balance in his account all because he was on my savings account. I have no memory of this loan I have never seen paperwork with my signature saying i authorize this loan or that I would be responsible for this loan or even his loans. We were never married. I was not on his personal checking or savings account. This balance doesnt belong to me. I have tried to dispute it but I dont feel they actually did a investigation because if they did this item wouldnt be on my report right now. the amount is {$2500.00} and it says the account was opened on XX/XX/XXXX according to my experian credit report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have had numerous unauthorized withdrawals from my checking and savings accounts with Suntrust Bank, XXXX was an illegitimate Pay Pal account that was withdrawing directly from my savings and checking accounts. When I approached the bank to have these rescinded the person assisting me assisting me asked if I had a pay pal account, to which I answered yes one that is tied to my debit card not my bank accounts. He intimated that I was at fault and that he would not help me, that I should contact pay pal and have them do something. I contacted pay pal, sure enough the person stealing my money did not have a legitimate pay pal account. I was instructed to contact the police to have this matter looked into and that I would have my money refunded. No refund, no help from the bank. A few days later the same thing happened to XXXX of the XXXX new accounts that I had opened, to prevent any further withdrawals from taking place, no help from the bank. This is XXXX issue I have with this bank, the other was a recurring charge that took place monthly but the bank would not help me locate who the money was sent to so that I could have it stopped. I contacted the XXXX number and was told that all moneys were going to be refunded upon their receipt of a signed affidavit sent to me by e-mail, I never received the e-mail, called again was promised the same thing, no e-mail, called again and was told I would receive XXXX in the mail, you guessed it no affidavit. I have since closed that account to prevent this from happening any further but in so doing my claim for the refund has been rescinded. An additional problem is concerning a separate account that was being charged a monthly fee when it should have been no charge as there was a direct deposit being made to that account as per the bank 's requirements. I do n't trust this bank nor do I think they are very interested in customer service. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have all these hard credit inquiries on my credit report which I did not approve. How can I get these removed? they all happened on XXXX XXXX, XXXX please help me remove these from my report? 

XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: After applying for a mortgage I found that there is a judgement on my credit report from XX/XX/XXXX. So I disputed it with Experian and investigated it on my own. I found that this judgement was obtained illegal and that the only information on this judgement that matched to me was my name. The address is incorrect and my social security number is not on the judgement. When I spoke to Experian they stated that the judgement has a address I used in XX/XX/XXXX. Only problem is I was residing in the state of XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX not XXXX. so they stated there not going to remove this invalid judgment. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX is a collection that was paid on my credit report. On my experian credit report it states it was open on XXXX. On my XXXX report it states the companys name as XXXX XXXX XXXX. And it states it was open on XXXX. The amount reported by both is {$700.00}. I payed this collection on XXXX. I was told it would be removed after 60 days as Ibwas told from the collection agency. It 's still not removed. I have disputed and yet it still remains on both credit reports. I finally got them to remove it from my XXXX. This item was paid and states that it 's paid. It has been over the 60 days. Also the reporting dates are both different and they are XXXX different collection companies reporting in my credit report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I just recently realize that for a long time my bank account had been illegally charged with unfair overdraft fees, my banking institution had been so abusive of these fees, that at times I had more than XXXX overdraft fees in XXXX week at {$36.00} each. After complaining to the bank, I realized that the bank manipulates the transaction history to their advantage, making it impossible for me to keep an accurate track of my financial transaction. My banking transactions are not posted in pending in the right order and if there is a cash request they will deliver cash withdraws over the pending transaction to purposely overdrawn my account and later charge all pending transactions an overdraft fees for each on of them. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX is a collection that was paid on my credit report. On my experian credit report it states it was open on XXXX. On my XXXX report it states the companys name as XXXX XXXX XXXX. And it states it was open on XXXX. The amount reported by both is {$700.00}. I payed this collection on XXXX. I was told it would be removed after 60 days as Ibwas told from the collection agency. It 's still not removed. I have disputed and yet it still remains on both credit reports. I finally got them to remove it from my transition. This item was paid and states that it 's paid. It has been over the 60 days. Also the reporting dates are both different and they are XXXX different collection companies reporting in my credit report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Background : We have been a loyal US Bank " Platinum '' customer for more than 15 years with credit scores in the mid XXXX 's. We have not missed any payments or ever been late on any payments on our existing loan, which US Bank originated approximately 5 years ago. Our current LTV and debt-to-income ratios are under 50 %. 
Details : In XXXX, we received a marketing piece from US Bank advertising a fixed rate of 3.5 % for a 20 year refi loan. At the time of application, the rate was 3.625 % with zero points for a 20yr refi loan. We submitted our loan application at the local US Bank branch on XXXX with XXXX XXXX. XXXX said we could start the process and if the rate dropped to 3.5 % we would get it. The first Good Faith Estimate ( GFE ) he provided on XXXX was at 3.625 % with {$1300.00} in buydown points and the loan amount was {$65000.00} higher than our current loan balance. We informed XXXX that the numbers on the GFE were wrong. He said he would issue a new GFE. In XXXX, the rates dropped to 3.5 % ( per the US Bank website ). On XXXX we emailed XXXX and told him we were still waiting for a corrected GFE and mentioned that we noticed the rates had dropped. XXXX issued a new GFE on XXXX with a correct loan amount but with the rate at 3.625 % and {$750.00} in points. He said " sign and return we can try to get lower rate once loan is approved. I need everything today please. '' We signed and sent everything back the same day. On XXXX we emailed XXXX telling him we still had not received a correct GFE. He requested more documentation from us and sent a new GFE on XXXX at 3.625 % with {$740.00} in points. Several months went by. On XXXX XXXX forwarded an email to us from XXXX XXXX of US Bank requesting even more documentation. We sent him the requested docs on XXXX. XXXX kept requesting " just one more thing '' several times, including copies of documents that were already of record in the County courthouse. Although we kept requesting a corrected GFE with the correct numbers, XXXX would send a new GFE at random intervals, always with incorrect numbers and usually including buydown points, which we said repeatedly we did not want. On XXXX, he finally sent a " final '' XXXX closing statement for review with a rate of 3.75 % and zero points. We spoke with his supervisor, XXXX XXXX, who said he could n't do anything except refund our application fee. We feel we were the victims of " bait and switch '' marketing, predatory lending, and possibly discrimination. Also, the lender did not process our loan application in a timely manner ( almost 7 months ). 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: i tried to open a complaint or dispute a charge on my credit card and received no help from my credit card.i was litterly scammed out of XXXX from a company that called itself XXXX.the services they promised were never provided and that is why i turned to my bank for help.i thought elderly people were supposed to be protected from fraud. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Several years ago I purchased a car from XXXX XXXX. At the time of picking up the car I had auto insurance with the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Michigan and I told the dealer to contact my insurance agent and transfer my XXXX insurance policy to my new car. 
The salesman only was interested in delivering the car, and without my permission contacted an agent who purchased an insurance policy with XXXX XXXX. The policy never went into effect, I never bought insurance from them as I had valid insurance with AAA. 
The fact that XXXX XXXX is alleging I owe them {$1100.00} is part of a criminal fraud between their agent and the dealership salesman. 
XXXX, XXXX a credit collection agency for XXXX XXXX is adversely reporting a collection account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I filed complaint ( XXXX and XXXX ), I received response from XXXX XXXX XXXX, Office of the president, Card services, XXXX XXXX is not capable and understand the case neither the knowledge about what is steampod is, XXXX XXXX is hair straightener that it comes with water tank with base and comb with straightener itself they ARE NOT ACCESSORIES that you mentioned I did purchased it fromXXXX, they should came with unit and further more when logged in to XXXX is not included in their product lists, when I purchased it I XXXX the Steampod andfound few, the cheapest was from XXXX and in the description DID NOT INDICATEDTHAT IS USES XXXX PLUG neither the THE XXXX knew it going to U.S.A and warningU.S A 's buyer that is uses different power source ( XXXX volt ) and not shipped the unitwith missing parts and further more THE XXXX knew the XXXX rules that we will be stockwith unit and can not ship it back due to cost that IS FRUAD the intention to deceiveand causing financial injury is FRAUD, your department has to protect their client from such as this predators, US Bank must make sure that The XXXXresponsible for gettingdefective unit back and provide the shipping cost for their unit. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Fair Credit Reporting Act makes clear that a debt discharged in bankruptcy must be listed as having a XXXX balance. FTC XXXX XXXX XXXX, item XXXX states : " A consumer report may include an account that was discharged in bankruptcy, as long as it reports a XXXX balance due to reflect the fact that the consumer is no longer liable for the dischargeddebt and there should be no additional reporting after the bankruptcy filing date. XXXX XXXX XXXX and the XXXX accounts was included in my Bankruptcy and needs to be deleted according to Chex Systems policy. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian recently added a collection on my credit report. The collection name is XXXX XXXX XXXX in the amount of {$290.00}. This collection is an old collection that was deleted from my crdit report and now being reported by a different collection company. I never recieved notice about this collection company, I monitor my credit report very closely and I have never even knew they were going to report this on experian. This is the only credit burea they have reported on. This amount is no longer owed. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My wife and I filed and received a chapter XXXX bankruptcy in XXXX XXXX. We continued to pay Specialized Loan Servicing outside of the bankruptcy, however they refused to send monthly statements and they removed my ability to see my account on-line. In XXXX XXXX, we apparently failed to make the monthly payment, a complete oversight on our behalf. SLS then began showing that we were 30 days late, we were completely unaware, and they continued this until the discharge of the bankruptcy. They also, during this entire time, reported to the credit bureaus that we were paying on time, again making us believe everything was OK. Then suddenly when the discharge took place in XXXX XXXX, they updated all the credit bureaus to reflect that we had been 30 days late every month XXXX 48 months XXXX. We should have been shown 30 days late XXXX time in XXXX of XXXX ... XXXX time, but instead they decided to punish us and show us late for four years. In my opinion this was a willful act to blemish our credit and reputation. When we were notified of the oversight ( missing payment ) we made it good, along with fees, but this was not good enough for SLS. To me it is an unfair practice to not supply a statement to a customer and not allow them access to their account, but then you want to smear their credit when you do not receive a payment. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is being reported on my XXXX, XXXX, and Transunion credit bureaus as a paid charge off. I paid this account in full. There was no profit loss. They said they would remove it after 60/days and they have n't done that. No offer was made. I agreed to pay full amount upon the removal in all three credit resort which hant been done. I payed this item in full on XX/XX/2015. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: A representative from Central Portfolio Control contacted XXXX relatives regarding an account in my name. 1. They contacted my daugther by phone, shared information with her about the account, and attempted to set up payment arrangements. 2. They also contacted my son-in-law about the same debt. During the phone call to my daughter 's husband, the representative shared information about the debt such as the asserted balance owed. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a judgment in XXXX county for XXXX XXXX XXXX that says it was reported in XX/XX/2014 and paid in XX/XX/2014. It 's being reported on my Experian and XXXX report. This item was already paid and part of medical bills from a accident that was n't my fault. They got paid but for some reason its on my credit report as a judgement. It should n't beven been on my credit report. It must be miscommunication. The paid amount is {$710.00} and the judgement is satisfied but should of nevet been a judgement. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian still has showing on my credit report an unauthorized inquiry from XXXX XXXX XXXX dated XX/XX/2014 after they stated it was not showing on my report. I need for this unauthorized inquiry be removed once and for all. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My mortgage was sold from XXXX XXXX XXXX to Carrington Mortgage services in XXXX of 2015. I continued my monthly payments to Carrington starting XXXX 2015. Carrington states they raised my escrow payment beginning XXXX 2015. I never received any notice of this increase. They started not applying my payments in XXXX 2015 because it was not enough for the payment they had raised. They started charging me late fees and eventually reported late payments to credit bureaus. They did not call or send any correspondance regarding my payments ever. I found out after shopping for new hazard insurance and finding derogatory reports on my credit. They claim their actions are legit because they claim they sent me increase notice. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Experian send back results as if I was only questioning the dispute process, when in reality I send A dispute letter asking Experian company to verify negative unverifiable information from my report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I accumulated over XXXX miles on my barclaycard arrival card account. worth at least {$1100.00} if redeemed for travel related purchases. the Bank decided that giving 2.2 % on all purchases is to custy to them, so they closed my account and are refusing to give me my rewards. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My payment made on XX/XX/XXXX was reversed days before Wells Fargo sent the loan to foreclosure. This is a blatant violation of the Frank-Dodd Act and Federal Banking Regulation Z. Wells Fargo has sent a XXXX letter to my insurance company telling them that the property is vacant or abandoned so my insurance company will cancel my policy and I will be forced to pay for Wells Fargo 's over priced insurance. This property has never been vacant in the XXXX years since I purchased it. 
Wells Fargo says " Customer was unavailable for consultation. '' The truth is Wells Fargo made no verifiable attempt to contact me. If Wells Fargo was not harassing me XXXX times a day they would be able to leave a message on the answering machine. 
Case number : XXXXWells Fargo Home Mortgage said : Explanation of closureCustomer was unavailable for consultation. 
See attached resolution letter. 
XXXX XXXX XXXXThis started when Wells Fargo withdrew money from the escrow account for expensesthat Wells Fargo did not incur. Then Wells Fargo applied our principle and interestpayments to the escrow account to cover the money Wells Fargo stole from theescrow account instead of applying the money to the loan. We have requested abalance statement for the escrow account a couple times verbal and a couple times inwriting. Wells Fargo recently sent us a letter stating Wells Fargo will not respond toissues with our account. We record our calls and have written documentation of WellsFargo 's crimes, so we could sue Wells Fargo. We would prefer to keep this out of thecourts. We have managed to make all our full payments before the grace periodexpires for over a year and a half. The last few months Wells Fargo lists our fullpayment as unapplied funds, so they can charge us more interest and late fees. We arecurrent on this loan and we have written documentation to prove it. Wells Fargo hassent us another ultimatum to pay what Wells Fargo says we owe by XX/XX/XXXXor they will foreclose on our property. 

I have filed another complaint with CFPB because XXXX XXXX failed to address the issues with this account. Case number : XXXX XXXX - Wells Fargo Executive Mortgage Specialist, stated that " You would have had to show proof of insurance coverage without any lapse for a full refund of the LPI premium. " This is not only a false statement it is a violation of a Federal Court Order. 
This is why Wells Fargo was sued and lost in Case No. XXXX. 
XXXX XXXX also failed to address the issue with payment of the 2009 property taxes from the escrow account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 've reached out to the debt collector for something that shows on my credit report, but they will not respond. I 've disputed the reporting of this debt to the credit bureaus twice, and they mark them as valid. However I still have never received something from this collector, nor have they responded to my request for more information. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: The investigation of my discharged bankruptcy and unauthorized inquiries by the credit bureaus have been extended for more than 45 days. No validation from the credit bureaus or validation from the companies that the credit bureaus gave access ( to my credit file XXXX XXXX XXXX ) has been given in writing. No validation of Debts has been given at all by XXXX, XXXX, XXXX and XXXX XXXX. BY law You MUST delete the discharged bankruptcy and all accounts in the discharged bankruptcy and ALL the unauthorized inquiries ASAP 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My name is XXXX XXXX Not XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response