AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I signed up for a USAirways XXXX XXXX credit card in XX/XX/XXXX when they were running a special promotion : Pay the annual fee of {$89.00} and receive XXXX companion flight certificates to be used anywhere they fly for {$99.00} each. Shortly thereafter, US Airways and XXXX merged and I was sent a letter that they will no longer honor the companion certificates. They did not offer to refund my {$89.00} annual fee. They only offered XXXX bonus miles if I spent another {$3000.00} on the card in 3 months. The company made good on the XXXX miles, but I just received a promotional mailer stating that they are offering the original deal again : XXXX companion tickets for {$99.00} each ... I just spoke with the company and I ca n't get a straight answer. They refuse to discuss the fact that the promo was taken away and now that it is being offered again, they said they could give me {$99.00} companion certificates but they would only be good for use in XX/XX/XXXX. Problem is that we take XXXX vacation per year and already purchased full-price tickets for our XX/XX/XXXX vacation because we were told they no longer offer the original deal ... Is this even legal? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a credit card that is with Bank of America it has been on auto pay for years. The auto pay did not happen in XXXX. I was not aware of why because I did not stop the auto pay. Bank of America Charged me a late fee due to none payment. After calling Bank of America and speaking to the bill pay department, the online department the credit card department and transferred back to online banking I was told that there is a system upgrade that caused an issue. However they still charged the fee and could not confirm that the auto pay was going to happen in XXXX. If they knew there was a system issue why would they not auto correct the issue instead of charging the fee? Because they want to XXXX from people and hope they do n't complain. It took XXXX minutes out of my day and no department took real responsibility they are making it difficult so that people give up and they can collect fees they should not even have charged. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In XXXX, 2014, I disputed a number of accounts for my husband and myself against my Experian credit report. I also provided documentation to support my request. I received a notice that the dispute was received form the bureau. However, the items remain on my and my spouses report with no change. 

Since XXXX, 2014, I have submitted online disputes to no avail. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 'm no longer an account holder of SunTrust. I used to be until I realized how unethical of a company that is. Let me explain to you why I believe this : For years, SunTrust advertised and promoted in big letters their XXXX XXXX debit card. With that card, an account holder could earn XXXX mile for every {$1.00} spent ( for debit and credit card transactions ). SunTrust even advertised that they would not put a cap on a cardholder 's ability to earn miles. 

Over the past XXXX months, SunTrust must have reviewed their debit card portfolio and what they did as a result of their review is shocking : They closed all account holders who had earned above average number of miles regardless of the types of products they purchased, regardless of the length of their relationship with SunTrust, and regardless of the amount of money in their checking accounts. I know of at least XXXX cases where SunTrust contacted XXXX XXXX to have the miles in the cardholder 's account reversed!!! 

SunTrust is clearly engaging in what is commonly referred to as " bait and switch '', a marketing strategy of getting customers to sign up for a product ( that, by the way, carries a yearly fee of {$75.00} ) and then, once a certain number of miles are earned, the account is closed. This is unacceptable and a regulatory violation. 

If SunTrust does not immediately stop closing accounts and reversing miles already earned, I 'll notify a well-known XXXX XXXX lawfirm to pursue a class action lawsuit against SunTrust and its XXXX and XXXX individually. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Please investigate the practices of Experian. They have manipulated my credit report and score. They are unresponsive and vague. My score has recently dropped XXXX points yet no one is able to give me a consistent answer as to what has happened. I have filed several disputes and they remain unresolved in addition I have cancelled my monitoring service. 2 days before the cancellation I was notified my score dropped XXXX points. I pay my credit card balances in full every month and I do not have any late payments that are undisputed. In addition, they are allowing a creditor to continue to " update '' information that is 15 years old. I have made XXXX calls and spoke with a manager " XXXX '' who all provided me with inconsistent and unverified information. I am exhausted with the run around, the responses I receive from Experian are. '' We do n't know '', " Probably '', " Contact the lender '', " It will take 30 days for a response '' I am in need of assistance from a governing agency above and beyond Experian and again I want a complete review into the very suspicious dramatic decline of my credit score upon cancellation of my subscription service. That is key information and I am willing to contact local media to investigate this company. In addition, it is my concern that this action is discriminatory. PLEASE contact me ASAP, I have been caught in this cycle for over a year and I have pending important matters that I need to take care of that involve my credit. Time is of the essence, I need to bring attention to and STOP this FRAUDULENT behavior. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been a XXXX XXXX XXXX for 4.5 years and my identity was stolen last year. The thieves obtained a credit card from Barclay which they used to rent and steal cars XXXX miles away in XXXX California. I have provided tips to law enforcement, leading to seizures of some of the thieves ' equipment, and the police have video surveillance and XXXX suspects in custody, caught in a stolen vehicle with many fraudulent IDs, including some for me. I have provided this information and the police report to Barclay and XXXX in multiple disputes since XXXX. I recently mailed a dispute to Barclay and requested all documents relating to this account, including a list of all charges and payments made, all investigative findings, when they contacted the law enforcement contacts I provided, and how and when they verified any and all information, as is my right under the FCRA. However, they have refused to provide me this information and are thus in willful noncompliance with the FCRA. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I worked in the XXXX for XXXX years during the XXXX. I was entitled to a Social Security ( Pension payment ) which is paid into my Bank of America XXXX Checking account.. 
I am now living in the XXXX XXXX XXXX years old and have experienced major XXXX XXXX recently.Because of my XXXX situation I need to transfer money money to the XXXX. 
A simple wire transfer XXXX would assume, not so, I can not transfer more than {$1000.00} without purchasing " XXXX '' but to do that I need a XXXX mobile phone number which of course I do not have. 
I have spent literally hours on the Telephone trying to resolve the situation all to no avail, the only avenue open to me is to write myself a check which I am told will take XXXX weeks at least and with Bank of America response to date I do not have a great deal of confidence 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: this is regards to the lawsuit settlement between CFPB and XXXX College. My son had XXXX student loans issued thru Genesis Lending via XXXX. My husband is a coborrower on these loans. He has received XXXX letters for the XXXX loans, but our son has not received these letters - it is very important that our son receives these letters addressed to him as it has these XXXX loans have had a negative effect on his credit reports. The letters sent to my husband stated that notification was sent to the XXXX major credit reporting agencies requesting that these tow loans ( accounts ) be deleted from his credit report, but our son has NOT received these leters. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: I am living in XXXX. My Citi bank credit card # XXXX has been blocked on XXXX XXXX 2015 without any proper notification. They have automatically cancelled my XXXX and charged some closer amount also for that. I called the customer care and raised a complaint and they told me this was happening due to the lack of XXXX document. They want me to provide the same and as per their communication XXXX of their representative will come and collect the same from myself. They have filed a complaint but did n't take any action yet. I called them for about more than XXXX times and none of them come to me to collect the XXXX document. I also went to their XXXX of the branch located in XXXX and produced the same. But still my card not got released and I did n't get any status update from them. I also payed for the money ( XXXX ) what I used for that particular month before the actual due date. I was using this card for more than XXXX months and I do n't know how can they allow me to use the card without proper XXXX document for more than XXXX months. I want to take necessary action on this issue. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Here is a copy of the letter I submitted to our mortgage servicer, Nationstar. After further research, Nationstar did contact our county for the tax amount, however, nobody seems to be referencing the figures shown on our XXXX, which reflects amounts necessary to cover our escrow needs. That is my chief complaint. 

Letter to Nationstar-After repeated, unsuccessful attempts to speak with a supervisor regarding our concern, I 'm now attempting to make contact and get answers this way. I want to dispute the increase of our payment based on a faulty escrow analysis performed on our account. According to the CSR 's that I have spoken with, an analysis was done, and revealed that we were short roughly {$2000.00}. This was based on an analysis that was done in XXXX, and based on an amount paid to our taxing authority, XXXX County. Had your analysis been done correctly, it/you would have discovered that the amount you paid to the county was for the last 2 months of XXXX, therefore making it a faulty analysis. Had you done the analysis correctly, you would have contacted the county, or perhaps even read the HUD1, and discovered that the amount to be set aside should have been $ XXXX, or {$2100.00}. An amount that would have more than covered the tax bill. I will not accept, nor be responsible for paying in the rears, and making up for an error made by your company that appears to coincide with your purchase of my loan, and shows the incompetence of Nationstar to properly service my loan. We will continue to make the necessary payments in an amount that will satisfy all current needs on our mortgage. Any shortages from XXXX can be absorbed by your company as a result of your own error. Figures below are based on Escrow Disclosure Statement dated XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, and the original HUD1 from our purchase of the home. P & I- {$900.00} Escrow- {$180.00} Homeowners- {$83.00} ( an increase over the HUD1amount of {$54.00} to cover actual insurance costs with Travelers ) MIP- {$200.00} Total- {$1300.00} This is the amount you will receive on our due date of XXXX XXXX, XXXX unless I hear from you with another option to correct this mess. If this does n't initiate some dialogue, then I 'll be submitting a legal QWR to resolve the issue. Thank you, XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Experian is reporting an item on my credit report on behalf of XXXX, for a credit card that was charged off XXXX, which means the first date of delinq was prior. It is being reported under good standing, which it is not. It was a charged off acct. They state they are reporting until XXXX, past the XXXX years they are allowed to report charged off accts. Since XXXX no longer owns the acct they will not remove the tradeline. I would like for experian to please remove the tradeline, or provide the correct removal date based off XXXX years from the XXXX date of delinquency. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I went to XXXX XXXX for XXXX shopping but my card was declined. I called Phone banking but was put on long holds, finally when some one made their self available I was told that my card was temporarily blocked. This stupid decision was made without even informing me thus after queuing up in line to buy for weekend and XXXX I had to leave store empty handed. Further when ever I contact BoA I have to face long holds and their chat representative are always busy as well. This wastes my time and in case of emergency i do n't think i would be able to get in touch with them. Do n't they calculate their capacity model, whats the use of having help line and chat if they are always out of representatives. 
Can you please look into the above complain because the representatives at BoA do not care about customer complains. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a XXXX mortgage with U.S. Bank. I had a loss of income due to a job loss. I needed to sell the house. Because the value of the house had fallen, I was upside down in the house. We had an offer to purchase the house that would leave a {$30000.00} shortfall. We asked the bank to work with us to either take less at close or lend the balance to me. I have been a U.S. Bank customer for over 20 years and have never missed or been late on any loan payment with U.S. Bank or any other creditor. Regardless U.S. Bank did nothing except ask for paperwork regarding the sale, my financial records, etc all of which I provided. U.S. Bank 's inaction over a 2 month period resulted in the buyer canceling the sale, since we could not provide a clear title. U.S. Bank refused to expedite my paperwork despite pleas from my attorney and me to make a decision so that we could lessen the financial loss to U.S. Bank and me. We presented XXXX solid proposals to the our assigned contact, filled out the paperwork correctly, spoke to a supervisor, all to no avail. U.S. Bank did not want to move forward on a simple {$30000.00} decision or provide any solution other than say they were working on it. Why did U.S. bank decide to harm themselves and me by taking no action. Now all parties will incur larger losses. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Pace Financial in XXXX, TN is horrible & when your unable to make your scheduled monthly payment they call & say if you do n't pay by the end of the month your vehicle will be repossessed because we have to have it in here by the end of the month or it goes to managers review. They keep you on the phone when they call for XXXX or more mins lecturing you & repeatedly tell your hurting yourself & your car will be repossessed if you do n't listen to us!!! They have no compassion to your situation or circumstances!!! Def stay clear of this company!!! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I received a letter from Penn Credit Collection agency dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 
The letter saying I owed {$56.00} for a parking ticket ( XXXX ) from XXXX XXXX, XXXX to the city of XXXX. 

I had paid the ticket in full in XXXX XXXX to a collection agency called XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX with USPS money order ( receipt number XXXX ) in the amount of {$56.00}. 

The amount I paid in XXXX is {$56.00} is the same ticket number XXXX from XXXX XXXX. 

I am not sure why Penn Credit is trying to make me pay for a ticket I 've paid for almost three years ago in full. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I paid my balance in full to reflect on my credit report through XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX original creditor was XXXX XXXX Retail orignal creditor acct # XXXX, when I went to apply for a home loan the mortgage company pulled my credit and it does not show as being paid in full and still shows a monthly payment and shows as delinquet and was not deleted as promised by the creditor upon payment. Equifax has already deleted this off of my credit report and I would like to request that Experian and Transunion does the same. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Unable to get a hold of business ( Progressive Management Systems ) who has reported information to XXXX about a medical debt that does not belong to me. I have contacted ( XXXX ) to clarify accuracy of debt, I was told they have No record of me at XXXX they told me to contact collection agency but I am unable to contact the company as every listed number is not active. I have filed a dispute through XXXX but company reports this is my account. how is that when I do n't live in same state or have ever in my life been to a XXXX hospital or group as XXXX has told me XXXX has No record of me. What do I do? 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Debt Recovery Solutions Of XXXX ( DRS ) did not notify me of a collection against my XXXX and reported the claim on my credit for {$470.00}. We were legally separated when she received medical services and our court orders specify that she is to pay her own XXXX above what insurance covers. I disputed the claim on my credit report and contacted DRS today, they will not remove the file stating I am responsible for her XXXX since we were still XXXX at the time. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: I keep getting a robo call ( XXXX ) threatening me with legal action accusing me of defrauding a financial institution. after i callled them back with a supposed case # they refused me any information like their adress. They told me their name is XXXX in georgia but the calls come from Ohio 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company attempted to collect on a XXXX XXXX debt that was paid in full. I contacted XXXX XXXX and researched with them and they were not showing a debt owed to them and could not find where anything was reported to this debt collection company. They were showing I was paid in full especially since I had current services with them. I contacted the debt collected company back and informed them off this and they said they would report it and have it removed. This was in XX/XX/2014. The account RECENTLY has been ADDED back onto my credit report and is showing as an open account and they are attempting to collect on it again. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Someone from this number, XXXX keeps calling my father 's residence looking to speak with me. Apparently, she has told my dad there will be legal action taken against me if I do not pay " said debt ''. However, I have all my financial information taken care of. She is violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by threatening someone else for a debt I supposedly owe. There is no verified debt amount, who the debt is from, and or a federally required debt collection notification letter sent to my address over said debt. 
I want these calls to stop occurring right now. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: There was a coding error with a Doctors visit ( XX/XX/XXXX ) which was resolved with XXXX XXXX billing Dept. XXXX XXXX picked up the collection. In a 3 way phone conversation ( XXXX billing, XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX Billing Dept. told XXXX XXXX that they were not the collection company authorized to make collection and that there is a XXXX balance on the XXXX XXXX Account. XXXX XXXX Billing Dept. Forwarded a two year billing history to me, which was sent to XXXX, XXXX, and Trans Union credit reporting agencies. All XXXX Reporting agencies did not acknowledge the reporting documents in the investigation. Because XXXX is the only agency that has a telephone number to resolve issues. I made a reinvestigation with XXXX only ( ref # XXXX ) XXXX at XXXX stated that there were no notes regarding the billing history in their investigation. I am convinced that All XXXX agencies took the same lack of investigation. 
In addition to the lack of investigation, XXXX XXXX was requested to send an itemized account regarding this issue in XX/XX/XXXX and has not been delivered to this date XX/XX/XXXXIn conclusion, I am not apposed to paying a debit that I owe. I do not feel that a persons credit should suffer as a result of a wrongful case management. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My wife and I contracted with a real estate agent for a short sale of our home. We notified all lenders, yet the XXXX lender required repeats on many of our documents, claiming they were unreadable or expired. Finally we were told all of our documents had been referred to the committee. After a months wait we were told they did n't have our real estate agent 's email correctly and our file was now paused. Documents were unreadable or expired. We are in our XXXX extension -- expiring at XX/XX/XXXX -- with a viable buyer because of this process. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am a Bank of America depositor with investments via their Merrill XXXX program. My wife is a joint acct holder on the BoA accts and has an IRA via Merrill as do I. BoA offers a Preferred Awards program for their depositors, which earn rewards at different levels for the different accts and amount on deposit, Gold= $ 20-50K, Platinum= $ 51-100K. etc. ALL of their published literature says the amount calculated is the COMBINED AMOUNT OF ALL ACCOUNTS, ON DEPOSIT WITH BOA AND MERRILL. 
Our joint check and MM savings totals avg ( 90days ) $ 25K, JOINT IRA= $ 3K, My IRA= $ 17K, my spouse= $ 38K, ALL of this totals over $ 51K, making us eligible for the $ 50K, or Platinum Tier level rewards. BoA says, not so, I am enrolled in Gold and My spouse is enrolled in Platinum as HER balances, ( which include our Joint Acct ) exceeds $ 51K, but mine do not. And HER Debit card earns rewards at XXXX level and Mine earns at a lower level ( rewards ) The BoA rep says accts can not be combined and ONLY Individual accts count! That is NOT what is published. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response