AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I am a cosigner for my sons private student loans through Wells Fargo. My wife and I refinanced our home to pay off the loans which was {$71000.00}. The loans were to be paid to Wells Fargo directly by the closing attorney with the proceeds from the refinance. This took place on the XXXX of XXXX. I checked on line and and saw that a residual amount was still on the loan of {$2900.00} I called Wells Fargo Customer service and said that because the loan was in forbearance the interest was not included in the payoff. i saw i was getting no where. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: COLLECTOR FAILED TO VALIDATE, CALL MY DAD AND SENT COLLECTIONS TO HIS HOUSE AND HAVE BEEN GETTING PHONE CALLS IN VIOLATION OF FDCPA AND TCPA 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: Citibank called my father, whom I do not live with and disclosed personal information about my debt and being behind with my bills. The third party ( father ) was informed about how much I owe them. They leave robocall messages on my phone every day, and do not make themselves accessible for me to try to call back at an appropriate time that allows me to solve the issue. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX offered me a {$20.00} discount on my {$330.00} in store purchase if I applied for their credit card. I applied and the discount was not taken on my purchase. I asked that the application be stopped but the salesperson said it was too late. She said I would receive a check for {$20.00} in the mail in the next weeks. A month later and still no check. I called barclays who said I would n't be receiving any points until I made more significant purchases! I asked them to take the card off my credit report and they refused. Please help. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been receiving numerous phone calls on my cell phone that shows up on my CID with the name XXXX CA and a phone number of XXXX, which XXXX is my local area code. When I called back the recording said ZFN & Associates. On XX/XX/XXXX I was contacted by ZFN & Associates at my place of employment. A lady named XXXX XXXX stated that I owed a loan for {$4400.00} and it was deposited into my bank ( she knew my bank name ) on XX/XX/XXXX. She wanted my birth date. I told her I do not give out any personal information over the phone and if the debt is true she would have my birth date and I do not nor have I ever took a loan for {$4400.00}. I then told her NOT to call my place of employment. I called my bank and talked to the fraud department and they went through all of XX/XX/XXXX deposits and there was never a deposits for the amount the lady stated. Only deposits received were from my employer. On XX/XX/XXXX I received XXXX more on my cell phone from XXXX CA and also at my place of employment. On XX/XX/XXXX I received XXXX phone calls on my cell from XXXX CA and XXXX at my place of employment. When I called back I told the lady I do not know of this debt and because I have not received a validation of debt that this debt is not valid. Also reminded her to NOT call my place of employment again. Which I 'm sure they will from the search I have done on them. From what I have read this place is a scam. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, 2015 I was written a check in the amount of {$270.00}, from XXXX XXXX, with an account from XXXX XXXX Bank. I attempted to deposit the check thru USAA 's mobile deposit, via my cell phone. I got a couple of error messages and decided to go to my local bank, XXXX, to deposit the check. The next morning, XXXX XXXX, I noticed that both banks accepted the deposit. I called both banks immediately and explained the situation, then I asked XXXX to call her bank and explain the situation, she did. USAA advised me to let the transaction happen and XXXX of the banks would reject the deposit. XXXX also informed me that XXXX of the transactions would be rejected. Within a few days I noticed that XXXX had returned the check and charged me a {$5.00} return fee, which I expected. The funds from the check were still in my USAA account. XXXX XXXX, 2015 the funds were pulled from the USAA account. I contacted USAA and the representative told me that the funds would be returned to XXXX XXXX 's account. I contacted XXXX and she explained to me that the funds were debited XXXX, then credited once and charged an overdraft fee. We waited a few days to see if the funds would be returned to her checking account, which never happened. I called USAA again on XXXX XXXX and they told me that the funds had been taken out of my account by the Federal Reserve and put into an account at XXXX XXXX, because it was a duplicate check. USAA told me that my local bank, XXXX, would have to take over and that it was no longer in their hands. The same day I called XXXX and spoke with the branch manager, and she explained to me that the check was not returned due to a duplicate item, but because there were insufficient funds in the XXXX 's account. I was advised to contact the Federal Reserve and give them the reference number that USAA gave me. Ref # XXXX. When I contacted the Federal Reserve they told me that USAA had given me the wrong information and that USAA would have to call on my behalf. The women with the Federal Reserve never asked me for the reference number, but instead suggested that I file a complaint if USAA refused to help me with the situation. I feel like USAA has given me the run around and ca n't seem to answer any of my questions correctly. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I received a pre-paid debit card for {$40.00} when I purchased tires in 2014. I used the card once and still had {$22.00} on it. I moved and misplaced the card. I recently recovered it, and I saw it had expired, I called to see if I could still receive my funds and they told me my card had expired and fees had applied for maintenance and I now have {$0.00} left. I felt this debit card provided not only had a short date on it for expiration, but also that I was charged these fees. This card is produced by citi.com. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Telephone calls received from Hunter Warfield for the past 11 months. Have not ever answered the calls -- can not provide details of reason for calls. 
Suspect that reason for call is a medical debt that my son 's wife owes. I have no debts and I owe no debts. 
Calls come from phone numbers XXXX XXXX XXXX, caller id is Hunter Warfield and XXXX XXXX XXXX, caller id is Toll Free 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I 'm currently homeless and I applied for a home on XXXX, CA. I was denied renting the home because there is an eviction showing on my tenant screening report. I 've reached out to the reporting company ( XXXX ) and advised them that case # XXXX was included in a chapter XXXX bankruptcy and was discharged on XXXX XXXX. The reporting company updated the tenant screening report to show as discharged. According to Experian credit report : " Your Experian credit report does not indicate that you have been evicted from your residence. However, your credit report could include a collection account for unpaid rent or lease payments, and as in your situation, a civil judgment if you were sued for breaking the lease. 
The court judgment will appear as a public record in your credit report and will remain for seven years from the filing date. Any public record item in a credit report would likely be considered very negative and could affect your ability to qualify for a new rental agreement. 
If included in bankruptcy, the judgment will be removed when the bankruptcy is discharged. You may want to submit documentation of the bankruptcy filing, discharge, and schedule of debts showing the judgment was included. A Chapter XXXX bankruptcy will continue to be reported for 10 years from the filing date, regardless of the discharge date. 
Any collection accounts discharged through bankruptcy are updated to show that they were included in the bankruptcy, but will still show the account history for seven years. 
Thanks for asking. '' The " Ask Experian '' team XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have submitted a dispute XXXX with TransUnion for a negative account that is listed XXXX on my credit report. It is obvious that there is a mistake because of the matching information ( creditor, account number, individual account, installment account, secured, balance, date opened, pay status, date closed ) on both of these accounts. However, one of the accounts shows that the date opened is XX/XX/2012 and the date closed is XX/XX/2012 which, again, clearly show a mistake since an account ca n't be closed 2 days before it is ever opened! TransUnion supposedly has verified that the account information is correct and both accounts remain on my credit report. This is still inaccurate information and I do n't understand how it can be verified as correct XXXX when it is obviously incorrect if for no other reason than the fact that the open/close dates on one of the accounts listed are not even possible! How can I get this removed if TransUnion claims that the accounts are verified and accurate? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Home mortgage discharged in bankruptcy. Debt collection company sends collection letter. I call and notify them debt is discharged in bankruptcy. Debt collection company tells me I am still responsible for penalties and fees. They refuse to accept validity of bankruptcy discharge. Internet research reveals this company is running a well known scam to illegally collect money that is not owed to them. They are running a con that relies on uniformed consumers fearing them. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX/XXXX/2015 person ( s ) unknown attempted to open or opened an account with XXXX/XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, OH XXXX, telephone number : XXXX. I became aware of this due to a fraud alert on Experian Credit. I need to have this investigated to determine if the account was opened, closed, etc. also, if my credit report was requested then a hard credit inquiry would be on my credit report. I need to have this removed. I am calling XXXX XXXX to find out what information they have developed. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: There was a news report that several ATM 's had scanners on their ATM 's in an area of town that I use the ATM 's. I checked my bank account and sure enough somebody had scanned my debit card and pulled out {$4500.00} out of my savings and {$100.00} out of my checking over a 7 week period. I had my debit card on me at all times, and I have never given my pin # to anybody. I called the bank, they said it was obviously fraud and said they would return my money. That was on XXXX XXXX. I have since had my claim denied for several ridiculous reasons and still do not have my money that was stolen. I had a savings account for several years and never took money out of savings, then over the course of XXXX weeks, somebody depleted my savings account and then moved on to my checking. The bank never notified me that somebody was withdrawing several hundred dollars a day several times a day without my knowledge. It was definitely not my pattern and out of the ordinary but they called it non-aggressive withdrawals. Seemed pretty aggressive to me that I would never take money out of the account and then nearly empty in XXXX weeks. I deposit cash in to my checking account that I get from my fianc for bills when he would cash his check at Bank of America. Why would I deposit cash into my checking and then turn around and pull out of my savings? It does not make any sense. They tried to tell me that it was my fianc taking the money, but he does n't even know my pin #, and the transactions were happening on the east side of town, while we were working on the west side of town. They showed me still pictures of him on dates that were not the same dates of disputed transactions. He also uses Bank of America. This is purposely trying to frame him and fraud. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Regarding account XXXX, reported by XXXX XXXX as the listed creditor to TransUnion LLC XXXX 
I spoke with the reporting creditor employee # XXXX XXXX/XXXX/2015 XXXX, and specialist # XXXX XXXX/XXXX/2015 XXXX in recorded and saved phone calls requesting them to verify and send copies of the information they 're reporting to the CRA. XXXX XXXX XXXX representatives stated they have no records of this account and could not supply any information on what was being reported because it was created by a different lender that no longer services. XXXX XXXX has stated they are not the original creditor but is reporting as such. Account is missing in all variations on annual reports pulled XXXX and prior but is reporting an open date XX/XX/XXXX. The alleged debt buyer identified by XXXX XXXX has made no claims to the account, nor has it sent any records of validation to justify the reported balance. TransUnion verified all account information with the reporting creditor despite admitted missing records, and has not complied with dispute requests to remove or XXXX ( a ) ( XXXX ) requests to disclose THE method of verification used for this particular account, only a general statement of various possible methods with vague and unspecified procedures. Actions are FCRA XXXX violations. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: SUMMARY : TCF intently setup a system to rip-off customers by delaying and manipulating the posting of transactions as a strategy to unfairly deceive for financial gains. 
XXXX TCF intently set up a system to rip off customers by delaying and manipulating the posting of transactions as a strategy to to find opportunistic time to charge unauthorized fees. I have called to complain to TCF on each of the different fee charges below and request that the fees get reversed, but they simply refuse to listen. I do n't understand how such a practice can be legal. Here are the fees charged and the dates they where charged on the accounts end in XXXX & a recently closed account. 

Acct -- -- -Dates XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX $ XXXX funny thing is, for many of the transactions that resulted in those fees, right before issuing the transaction, I would check my bank account, see that there 's enough fund to cover the transactions, only to find the next day that TCF had something else under their sleeves. In most cases, TCF would claim that yes you did have enough fund in your account at the time, but your deposited checks did n't clear in time to cover the currently issued transactions and those " delayed '' transaction that never did show up in the first place. They pick and choose, when or what time to post transactions as a " delaying strategy '' to intently charge unwarranted fees. That 's a clear definition of Unfair and Deceptive Practice. Especially that when all these fees are being accessed, at least XXXX of the accounts ( checking or savings ) always has enough fund to cover for any transactions that may have been issued by me ; but TCF asks for fees every time they would be put in place to process a transfer from your own account to cover a transaction from one account to another. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: A company called Delta Management calls several times a week. The person calling is called XXXX XXXX. I have repeated told her that I am not the person she is trying to reach and that I do not have nor have ever had student loan debt. She keeps trying to get personal information from me. I have asked her to stop calling and have had to block her number to stop the harassment. She is rude and hangs up. Their phone number is XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I request a XXXX credit report and the report indicates a Florida address, phone and an account with Wells Fargo Bank that are not mine. I communicate with Wells Fargo Bank and I have no options for removing this account does not belong to me. I have been a victim of identity theft. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: After using the service XXXX for a few years now to send money to my son in prison and having it charged to my credit card as a regular transaction, no transaction fee, regular interest rate, the Bank of America has recently ( XXXX, 2015? ) reclassifed XXXX as a Money Transfer service so they are now showing it as a Cash Advance item, which is subject to an additional {$10.00} fee AND the much inflated interest rate for Cash Advances. First, no notice was sent that this was happening. Second, it feels predatory on a population of consumers who tend to be the least equipped to take on such additional financial burden - it is the family of the prisoners who pay this fee, not the prisoners who are already being punished. Just to illustrate : My {$100.00} transaction was charged {$6.00} fee by XXXX ( which I was aware of ) then the credit card company charged an additional {$10.00}, then it is treated as a Cash Advance with 25 % interest on the TOTAL amount of {$100.00}, so more than {$25.00} in interest. I 'm not great at math, but I believe that puts the transaction at about XXXX cents on the dollar. The credit card companies do have a choice in how the classify these transactions. Please look into this matter. It is wrong on so many levels. Thank you. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: wells fargo sent a new card to an address that is not mine and did not request refused to take false address off my account. refused to resolve problem or help me find the person that canceled my card and had a new card sent to them. told me they could not take false address of my account. no help offered status of account. do not know if crook is out running up charges on my account or not .the crook has total control they claim I can do nothing. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I went to Bank of America to make a bank transfer to XXXX it 1st goes to a XXXX bank, can not be done on lineThe bank associate did not listen to me and sent the banktransfer direct to XXXX, client called, said money is beingreturned, went back to the bank the associate said she wouldhave the transfer returned and sent another bank transfer, the associate forgot to have the 1st transfer returned so thethe client got XXXX bank transfers of $ XXXXI sent a email to the XXXX of Bank of America it has been7 weeks, and Bank of America says its my fault and want to our company to settle for half the money $ XXXXI never thought that Bank of America would act this wayto a client..they have refuse to take any blame and refuse to refund our money this started XX/XX/2015How I found out the associate forgot the have the transferas I call the bank transfer department and they told me the1st transfer was never stopped so on XXXX/XXXX/15 I called thebank, that is when the associate did the return of the 1sttransfer 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has engaged XXXX XXXX as her official Housing Counselor to submit this complaint on her behalf. Around XXXX XXXX XXXX contact Select Portfolio Servicing ( SPS ) the mortgagee who is the current servicer of her account. In order for them to quantify her for this special program for homeowners living on a small budget and can longer afford her home due the high interest rate of 10.75 %. This program is entitled XXXX XXXX Relief Program that allow homeowners to keep their homes under a paid in full settlement. Without any other cost to them. When she started reaching out to SPS she was current on her loan and was seeking an answer before the end of that first month never happen. After she had and requested that she be considered for this special program. This how the program works, after producing the required documentation the underwriter will closeout the loan. After XXXX XXXX faithfully submitted everything they ask for, now SPS is refusing to accept her income statement concerning her small pension of nearly 20 years to complete the transaction. They have inform us that they will not and can not accept the bank statement where both her XXXX is been deposit. She had inform SPS that the company only gave her a statement of of what her monthly pension will be and the company is refusing to send her any more statement concerning her pension, after informing SPS they are totally denying and workout option for her. They are using her pension as an excuse in order to keep her loan current rate as it is and force her into a foreclosure. This a predatory lending practice which violate Frank Dodd Predatory Lending Practice Act and Discrimination under The National Fair Housing Act. We are refusing to allow SPS to keep abusing Senior homeowners from practicing this negligence and unsound deceptive business practices. Please help. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My mortgage was sold by XXXX to Loancare LLC on XXXX XXXX, 2015. My mortgage payment was due on XXXX XXXX. I submitted a payment to XXXX electronically on the XXXX, not understanding that it would n't go through, and in fact I was given a confirmation number as receipt of payment. A week later I checked my bank account and no funds had been taken out of my account. XXXX 's website now said that my loan had been sold and gave me an incorrect customer service number for Loancare XXXX. After finding the correct number ( and calling XXXX to let them know the number on both their website and customer service line was incorrect, ) I spoke with Loancare who informed me that my payment had not been processed and was now late. I was informed by Customer Service that there were no late fees associated with it - in fact that no late fees could be associated with my account for 60 days after the sale - however, there is a one time payment fee on a sliding scale depending on how late your payment is. For payments 1-4 days after the due date there is no fee, 5-9 days is a {$5.00} fee and 10 days or more is a {$10.00} fee. They say this is a one-time draft fee and not a late fee, although I 'm at a loss to understand how this is n't a late fee in disquise. I made the payment to Loancare electronically - including the additional {$5.00} fee - because I wanted to make sure my account is up to date and I feared racking up any additional " fees. '' Their Customer Service Department said that they can not waive that fee and I should look to XXXX for reimbursement ( which does n't make a lot of sense. ) I believe that the " processing fee '' for late payments is in fact a " late fee '' illegally charged to customers during a confusing and poorly managed loan sale. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response