AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: Ditech Mortgage held my personal mortgage check ( mailed out the end of XXXX, 2015, for the XXXX XXXX, 2015 mortgage payment ). On XXXX/XXXX/15, when I called and they were unhelpful and clueless when I told them I mailed it in and transferred me to different people in customer service to keep telling my story over & over again. I got no advise so I said I would pay it online to have proof of my payment. The next day, XXXX/XXXX/15, XXXX mortgage payments were taken from my checking account, the check payment and on-line payment. They were holding my check at someone 's desk at Ditech and cashed it when I called in. I want my {$12.00} fee payment back that I was forced to pay online. To require someone to make XXXX mortgage payments in one month does not appear to be legal. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: On Wednesday, XXXX XXXX, leased a new Toyota Sienna. I called Trans Union and " unfroze '' my account for 72 hours. The dealership was unable to get a copy of my credit report as it was still listed a frozen. On XXXX XXXX, I placed a second unfreeze request for 7 days. Again, the dealership attempted to pull a copy of my credit report and was unable to do so because the account was frozen. I called Trans Union at XXXX on XXXX XXXX, escalated through XXXX Supervisors, until I reached a XXXX who claimed that she corrected the issue and everything was fine. However this morning, XXXX XXXX, the dealership attempted XXXX more time - and was unable to pull my credit report. I called Trans Union and they claimed it was corrected. I called the dealership, and once again, they are unable to pull a copy of my credit report because it is frozen, but the supervisor I talked with today XXXX assured me that the problem was corrected. I do n't know what to do next. The dispute is still open and Trans Union does not seem to know what the problem is. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This loan has been paid and is only due for XXXX however XXXX and XXXX reports a $ XXXX balance due and it should report a XXXX balance like XXXX . In addition to that XXXX reports the loan " Charged Off '' for XXXX and XXXX. All Credit Bureau reporting across all three credit bureaus are inaccurate. This loan has been taken care of with GAP and a XXXX payoff leaving me with a balance owed of XXXX, which will be taken care of on XXXX/XXXX/2015, all XXXX should report the updates! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Was a victim of identity theft, someone opened an account, in another state, with XXXX using my name & my ss # on XX/XX/2015. On that very same day happens to be the very same day I last logged in and obtained my credit report from free credit report XXXX. The issue with XXXX has been corrected and they have supplied notice via email attached. 

I was taking the further step of installing credit freezes, starting with TransUnion. On the TransUnion web site they indicate as a victim of ID theft I was entitled to placing a freeze though their site free of charge as a victim residing in Mi. 

I was charged {$10.00} and supplied a reciept. I contacted customer service at TransUnion, they indicated that there was no freeze in place and they had no record of charging my account. I offered to supply the receipt and copy of charge showing on my credit card, they issued a Ref ID # XXXX and a phone number for a supervisor ; XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

I have made repeated attempts ( XXXX ) to contact, leaving messages with all contact information ref # etc. I can not get a response. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been actively filing loan modifications with B of A sinceXXXX. I am a XXXX Veteran and I did use my VA certificateto secure my home in XXXX. My home was finance thruCountry Wide before B of A bought my loan. B of A didservice my home for foreclosure while I was serving in theXXXX XXXX about XXXX XXXX and the loan was noteven 2 months behind. I came home in XXXX XXXX andrequested another loan modification but no response soI obtained an attorney. My attorney did respond to B ofA and requested all correspondence concerning my homebe sent to them and they were actively involved with myloan modification. In early XXXX I was notified by areal-estate agent that my home was listed for foreclosureand public auction. No XXXX service me or my attorney. Theforeclosure was listed in the local newspaper. This wasnews to me and my attorney since we both had no ideaand was actively involve with a loan modification at thetime. I have since been working with Attorney Generaloffice in Florida. I was given guidance from the AG tofile this complaint with CFPB along with their inquireabout my case. I have been told my request formodification has been denied for reasons such as '' I was not living in the home and it is a VA require-ment '' which is not true, " insufficient income '', mycurrent husband signed a form stating he wouldcontribute {$1500.00} additional income to my household to help cover the cost and the list goes on. 
I am currently enrolled in a XXXX programwith the XXXX VA and is receivingtreatment. My condition is described as " XXXX '' at this time but with support from my husbandand adult children I am trying to do what isnecessary to keep my home. I am filing thiscomplaint because I too believe I am a victimof " dual tracking '' with B of A. They are notowning up to their constant mistakes. I don'tunderstand why they will not work with me tohelp me keep my home vice foreclosing. I amnot trying to run from my responsibility of payingfor my home. I just need help with lowering the payment so I can afford it. Is that too much to ask for? 
B of A pulled back the foreclosure because they justrealized we were working on a loan modification with mebut recently filed a petition in court another foreclosure. 
I have no other option but to file bankruptcy to keepmy home. This not fair to me the consumer because allI wanted was a lower payment. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have XXXX Bank of America credit cards. For about the tenth time in XXXX years I have made my monthly payment timely to B of A, in excess of the minimum amount due. B of A has a system error they refuse to fix whereby payments submitted in close proximity to the generation of a monthly statement will be reflected on the account, but will not clear the " payment due '' code online or in their voice response system. And that is not just a harmless " glitch '' -- it is actually on their books that there is a payment still due. The XXXX time I assumed it was a " glitch '' and would resolve itself, it did not, and B of A started calling me about a " late payment. '' Subsequently it happened numerous times. This past month it happened on XXXX of my B of A cards and with the payment due notation still on there, I just went ahead and for about the XXXX or XXXX time just made a double payment because I did not have an hour to dedicate to sitting on hold. So, happened again this month on my other B of A account, made my payment, still showed due. So I started an online chat a few days ago and the rep said they would fix it. They did not. I have now been on the phone for almost an hour with B of A and they are saying all they can do is reverse the payment I made and have me remake it. And they first tried to tell me the incorrect story that it was a " glitch '' that would resolve itself once the next statement generated. I pointed out to them the first time I made that assumption they were on the phone with me calling me and accusing me of failing to make a payment when due. Unbelievable, unacceptable, bumbling incompetence. They should have their license pulled. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I obtained vehicle insurance and I received an Insurance Score Notice stating there was PRESENCE OF A BANKRUPTCY ( SEE ATTACHED ). I do not have a Bankruptcy. In XXXX of 2014, I contacted CFPB to file a complaint against XXXX, Case Number : XXXX. TRANSUNION, DELETED the Bankruptcy from my Credit Report ( SEE ATTACHED ). 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Forster and Garbus, located at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX has been paid in full by me and refuses toforward to me, the letter of satisfaction stating that they were paid infull. Forster and Garbus bought the debt from XXXX and filed a judgment in the with XXXX County Court that states as non satisfied debt paid. I have left Forster and Garbus several voice mails giving them the change of address to send the letter of satisfaction and I have received no response. My new address is XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX. The previous address was XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, NY XXXX. I want a letter of satisfaction sent to my home or please advise me on what the next steps to take to have them send what I need. In addition, much of the debt on the XXXX credit card was charged when I resided in the state of XXXX prior to returning to XXXX. They, Forster and Garbus had knowledge of that. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: In XX/XX/XXXX I filed a complaint against this company and they responded by stating the following : '' Financial Corporation of America shows no open inventory or credit reporting under your name or social security number ''. 

Again I submit my complaint ... In XX/XX/XXXX my personal information was compromised when my car was broken into and my handbag stolen. Since XX/XX/XXXX a series of accounts have been opened using my personal information this has caused my once great credit to plummet to XXXX. Over the past 18 months I have had creditors collections agents harass me for balance owed to accounts that I know nothing about and my credit is non-existent and my hopes of purchasing a home is in jeopardy because of I am a victim of Identity theft. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Bank of America is attempting to collect a debt that does not belong to me. I was forwarded statements with an account number that does not belong to me. As per my credit report I have outstanding debt on this account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX my account at US Bank was XXXX and some change. On Tuesday XXXX 2015 I was charged an extended overdraft fee of XXXX because my account was negative XXXX and some cents. So on that same day I deposited XXXX. To cover the overdraft fee because customer service stated they could not wave the fee. Today I now have another extended over draft fee XXXX/XXXX/15 with no explanation. Not to mention that I am enrolled in overdraft protection and have not made any transactions since XXXX This is insane!!!! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My mortgage servicer is trying to foreclose on my home. They 're saying that I failed to meet the requirements of my modification trial payment period. They sent me some documents via XXXX. I signed them and sent them back via the prepaid XXXX label that was required for me to use. I made copies of all documents sent to me. They 're saying my first payment was due XXXX XXXX, 2015, my documentation ( from the company ) says that my first payment was due XXXX XXXX, 2015, which was paid. The servicer is saying they have n't received the payment, which I know they have via bill pay through my bank account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I notice a new collection on my XXXX credit report and didnt reconize it disputed it with the credit bureau. Cam back as verified. Contact the collection angency that was listed on my credit report and ask about this debt. Then they gave me a name other than mine as the oweing the debt. And told them i am disputing this debt i want original bill and what if anything i paid on this aledged debt and what are the charges for. The agent said to me we dont do that all we have is a computer generated bill ( tied assuming to my social security number being on my experian credit report ) cause the name they gave me was XXXX. Not XXXX, and they told me i need to contact the oringinal creditor not them i keep asking for them to validate the debt but refused telling me its not there job. I told them to remove this from my credit report but refused to. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX is charging me for services rendered for XX/XX/2014, however, as my lease shows ( attached ) I did not even move into the house until XX/XX/2014, further more, I was in XXXX until XX/XX/XXXX, and my service was not activated here in XXXX until appx XX/XX/2014. 

The account has been turned over to Enhanced Recovery Company, and after numerous attempts, I am getting no where with having this information removed from my credit report. I do not owe this debt. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Bank of America has offered an XXXX Rewards XXXX for many years. We had accrued many XXXX dollars worth of points that we typically redeem near XXXX time to purchase restaurant pre-pay cards that we use as gifts. I learned today when I went to their web site that Bank of America unilaterally cancelled the program and eliminated my points. They also failed to provide information on how many points they took from me so I do n't have a total value. When I contacted them, they said they had mailed me notices, but I do not recall receiving that mail. They contend that since they told me the theft was going to occur in advance, that the theft was legitimate. I received nothing of value for the points I had accrued in return for their decision to cancel the program. I consider this fraud and an act of bad faith. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am a homeowner in Massachusetts who has tried for over 2.5 year to work with my lender on both a modification and a short sale. There are serious issues with SLS on both accounts. There is NOW an AUCTION on my property on XXXX XXXX, this year. 

I was not given proper notice, the certified mail informing me of the sale did not arrive until after I spoke with my point of contact, who had informed me that there was still time to pursue a modification. 
The resolution process switched from a short sale to a modification. 
As of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX I was informed that there was no sale date scheduled. 
Although all documents are received by SLS and underwriting has started I am told that the date of sale leaves no time to evaluate my situation. 
SLS has been unable to contact me directly as the phone numbers on file were incorrect SLS has not had an up to date appraisal and is seriously overvaluing the property. 
- SLS has turned down XXXX qualified offers for a short sale I was never approved for the modification, so in XXXX of XXXX we decided to sell our family home. From XXXX of XXXX until XXXX of XXXX, we had submitted XXXX offers on our property from different buyers. In each case SLS REJECTED the offer saying it was too low. The highest offer was {$110000.00}. Our house is our family home, but needs work. The first counter we got from SLS was {$180000.00}. The next counter was {$150000.00}, and now in XXXX of XXXX I 'm being told the lowest they will accept is {$130000.00}. They are saying this last amount without having stepped foot inside this home since last XXXX. 
Where is the regulation on valuations? Why is it we can show proof our house can not fetch the value they want and they are allowed to force a homeowner to foreclosure? At what point over a period of almost two years does the lender realize the home value is not worth their required price? Why are n't we as homeowners allowed copies of their valuations? We are required to get an appraisal to get a loan, so why are n't we privy to valuations when they foreclose on our homes? If their valuation is being used in the determination to foreclose then I feel a citizen I have a right to that information and ANY information being used to make a determination to foreclose upon me. 
I have tried unsuccessfully for over two years to work with SLS, and before them XXXX XXXX XXXX. My loan was sold from HUD to some XXXX party investor, who has made it very difficult to sell. If my loan was still backed by HUD I would at least be given a copy of the appraisal, and they have clear guidelines as to what they will and wo n't accept for short sales. Since my loan has been sold, I have had no assistance with SLS. I will be forced into foreclosure, and I was never offered a Deed in Lieu, which is no better than the foreclosure, because there is no regulation on lenders over proper valuations. 


Respectfully XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been receiving collection calls from Ally Financial after I explained to them I am not the party they are seeking please remove my number and do not call my cell. I have received XXXX more calls this week from XXXX harassing me, these calls were made on XXXX and XXXX to my cellXXXX. I understand they are currently in violation of the FDCPA prohibiting calls to my cell after I have told them numerous times not to contact me I am not the correct party. I will also send this complaint to the CEO of the company 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: A couple of years ago, we were introduced to Nationwide Biweekly Administration regarding a Mortgage reduction plan they were promoting. After speaking with them, they ensured us that there were no up front fees other than a {$3.00} processing fee taken from our bi weekly withdraw. They further stated that the key to the biweekly process came from XXXX bi weekly withdraws ( essentially paying 13 months instead of 12 months ). The process would include an initial debit that acted as a " deferred payment '' which they assured would, in its entirety, eventually go to our mortgage payment. In mid XXXX of 2015, we were contacted by Nationwide Biweekly and informed that for an unspecified reason, they could not pay our bank that month, that they were essentially dropping us until the problem could be resolved, and that we would have to resume making our own mortgage payments for that time. We inquired about the money already taken out for the month, and they affirmed it would be redebited to our account ( which it was, minus {$3.00} ). However, while recently researching making bi weekly payments directly through our mortgage provider, it came to our attention that Nationwide Biweekly had charged its customers a large lump fee up front, which we were told was not the case when we signed up. We then contacted Nationwide Biweekly and inquired about the alleged initial fee. This was the first time anyone at Nationwide Biweekly informed us of that fee. While she would not quote an exact monetary amount, she informed us that it was withdrawn from our initial first debit. Since Nationwide Biweekly failed to inform us of this fee, and since they dropped us prematurely ( prior to the completion of the mortgage pay off ), we wanted to know how to get that initial fee back ( since they originally told us it was a deferred payment that would go toward our final payment - which is did not, nor will it since they dropped us ). The representative told us it was non refundable, but upon further pressing, stated she was not able to answer that question and would transfer us to someone who could. We then waited on hold for approximately 45 minutes before our connection was terminated. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: In XX/XX/XXXX I filed a complaint against this company and they responded by stating the following : '' Financial Corporation of America shows no open inventory or credit reporting under your name or social security number ''. 

Again I submit my complaint ... In XX/XX/XXXX my personal information was compromised when my car was broken into and my handbag stolen. Since XX/XX/XXXX a series of accounts have been opened using my personal information this has caused my once great credit to plummet to zero. Over the past 18 months I have had creditors collections agents harass me for balance owed to accounts that I know nothing about and my credit is non-existent and my hopes of purchasing a home is in jeopardy because of I am a victim of Identity theft. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have paid my account balance to barclay card ( apple rewards ) in full each statement. Each time I went online to access my account, the balance did not XXXX out and I had a balance due. I have as result overpaid my account by {$540.00}. I have requested a refund of this amount from the card holder however, I am reporting this because their systems are not accurately crediting payments. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was promised 18 month 0 % interest financing, however, the company Barclaycard is charging me interest and refuses to correct or refund me for the interest they 've charged. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: There is an open collection 's debt. This debt has been settled in full. The creditor informed me this debt would be reported to all XXXX credit reporting agencies and removed from my credit report. It is still there. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company is telling me that in order to get out of default, they figure repayment plans with gross income and family size only. They wanted {$800.00} a month, plus the {$610.00} out in wage garnishment. The federal student loan website that a rehabilitation plan must be a " reasonable '' amount. I do not think this is a reasonable amount and would like some help with getting out of default. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My wife and I have completed successfully XXXX trial loan modifications with Wells Fargo/ASC on loan number XXXX an Investment property. 
We also completed XXXX trial payments on another Separate Wells Fargo loan number XXXX. Wells Fargo said they would not modify these loans if the liens were not addressed. 
These liens which the Wells Fargo Home Preservation specialists provided us with were cleared. 
In XXXX 2015 Wells Fargo modified loan number XXXX, but they have refused to modify this loan number XXXX. They want us to pay off the second lienholder or have them subordinate the lien. 
The second lienholder has modified their loan twice but Wells Fargo said they will not modify the loan. Our even speak to the Second lienholder who agreed to work with me if Wells Fargo contacts them. I have no single point of contact at Wells Fargo, I keep getting letters but when I call in to Wells Fargo I am transferred from person to persons who keeps telling me to send in documents or call back when I get my second lienholder to subordinate the loan. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My loan was sold from XXXX to BSI mortgage and they have added {$10000.00} in fees to my account and will not remove them. I have sold my home and it is closing XXXX/XXXX/15 I need help to make them reduce the fees and follow the loan contract I have in force. XXXX XXXX XXXX or XXXXXXXXXXXX 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law