AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: The company XXXX has sent a bill I do not owe to XXXX different collection agencies. XXXX, and ERC. The first attempt at sending it to collections I requested validity of the debt and was told XXXX had to look into the balance and if I did not receive anything then it would be resolved. I did not receive anything and then a year later got a letter from ERC collections also from XXXX for the same date of service but the bill was {$20.00} more than it was before. I disputed the bill with this agency and they said I did everything I could do with them and that to get the bill adjusted I would need to contact XXXX. After calling XXXX they claim they can not find the account and then gave me a number to call that was a disconnected number. So at this point the bill has been with XXXX collection agencies, shows XXXX different amounts for the same service, the current collection agency says they can not do anything unless XXXX adjusts the bill which they claim they cant find and that if I cant get them to fix it then it will be sent to a different collection agency for me to dispute again. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: We received a " virtual '' prepaid Citi Visa card containing {$250.00} XX/XX/XXXX. When we tried to use it XX/XX/XXXX we found that it expired XX/XX/XXXX. I subsequently learned that the federal CARD act requires prepaid Visa cards to not expire in less than 5 years. I contacted Citi, but they refuse to extend the expiration date. I have uploaded a file containing an email I sent to Citi requesting the extension, and their reply in which they claim their card is exempt from the legislation. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I bought a vehicle from a dealer in XXXX NY, AND they give me a New jersey, plate which was a fake license plate, and l got arrested, And they had no explanation for me, So i tell them i will like to return the vehicle, which I did, Come to find out they were some scam dealers 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My loan was serviced by XXXX XXXX and transferred to Mohela in XXXX 2015. My history of loan shows shocking info such as eight and five months period where my balance does not change despite a faithful monthly payments! XXXX has been ignoring my requests. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I received a deposit of {$50.00} from XXXX XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/2015. I spent a total of XXXX off the card on XXXX at XXXX. I go to the store to make a {$7.00} purchase and my card declined yet i still had a XXXX balance. I called them up they said it was a business/company error my money would be back on the card at XXXX. XXXX comes my money is not there, i call again at XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/2015 they then tell me its my fault and i have to wait 8 days to get my money back. I am so fed up with speaking to these people. How can they just take my money and get away with it. I spoke to a guy name XXXX he claim he was corporate, but there was nothing that he could do. I have to wait 8 days. That money was to be used for bus fare for me to get to work until i got paid I have not been able to go to work or eat because of this situation. It 's not fair. They should not be able to just take my money and not put it back on the card. I do n't understand that. They did the same thing with my girlfriends card but put her money back on the card at XXXX. Please help with this situation. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 'm trying to refinance my house but when they pull my credit score theycant get it??? 6 months ago it showed XXXX now It 's not available?? Theysaid Wells Fargo is n't sending the info on my house payments. Is thatpossible? please help me. How can I not have a credit score? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been working on a short sale contract for my condo in Florida with GreenTree ( now Ditech ) since XX/XX/XXXX. I have a real estate lawyer to help me navigate this but he has not been able to get much response from the bank. They are constantly passing my contract to a new negotiator who claims to know nothing. This buyer has been very patient and agreed to the bank 's asking price of XXXX ( which is above all the comps ) in XX/XX/XXXX, yet the contract fell through because GreenTree was not responding to any calls or emails from my lawyer. I almost lost this buyer but he decided to give it another shot, we resubmitted the contract in XX/XX/XXXX, and still the contract gets no response. This is for the amount the bank negotiated and I have provided all paperwork they asked, so why is this not moving forward? I 'm afraid this will go into foreclosure. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX, 2015 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXXOffice of Consumer ResponseConsumer Financial Protection BureauConsumerfinance.gov ( XXXX ) XXXX ( XXXXREFERENCE : Select Portfolio ServicingXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX Number : XXXXAccount Number : XXXXDear XXXX XXXX : Selected Portfolio Services is my mortgage servicer. I have entered dialogue with this servicer due to the following : In 2015 I received approximately {$5000.00} in funds that had been held back in error when my loan was transferred from XXXX XXXX XXXX to Select Portfolio Services. 
During this period SPS reported late payments and other derogatory information to the credit agencies. This has damage my credit and made it impossible to receive mortgage financing. I am requesting compensation. 

SPS escrows my taxes. SPS failed to calculate the taxes required and did not make a tax payment on time. This causes the local county to place a tax lien on my property. 
This contributed to my poor credit rating and credit distress. 

My original mortgage was with XXXX. I was living overseas at the time : This mortgage had undisclosed PMI insurance. 
The mortgage was uneconomic in that the annual mortgage P & I is less than the property taxes. This was not disclosed. 

SPS modification was simply fraud : The modification decreased the monthly P & I from the original {$2700.00} to $ XXXXThis modification on a payment basis is insignificant and does not provide relief. 
I like for this mortgage to be exclude for in favorable HAMP reporting and financial benefits. 

I have had the house on the market over the past modification. The P & I to Property Tax ratio push buyers away. I will need a principle reduction to {$750000.00} to make the home attractive to buyers and fair to me. 

SPS has placed PMI insurance of my HAMP loan which was undisclosed to me. 

Please help. I am XXXX now and would like to remedy this due to XXXX. 


Sincerely, XXXX XXXX, XXXX 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Unethical and discriminatory lending criteria. 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I moved to US in XXXX XXXX. In XXXX, I started receiving many adverse actions from banks/potential landlords due to my Experian Credit Bureau Report. When I contacted Experian to get the bureau report, I was never provided it and was never given a resolution to the problem. Till now, I continue to get declines. As I learn from the people reviewing the reports, I have delinquent trades from XXXX in my bureau reports, when I was not even in US!! Someone can contact XXXX to verify that information. Not being able to rent a house is the most difficult thing. Where am I supposed to live! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Can not verified my identity. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have some accounts on my credit report that are not mines. I can not dispute online per Experian. Experian is not questioning these accounts just saying they are mines. I have a lot of inquiries I have disputed they wont remove but yet put a fraud alert on credit report. 
Account XXXX ' XXXX XXXX XXXX, shows on credit report as a charge off not once but XXXX. Both accounts should be deleted. Both are wrong. 
Account XXXX XXXX XXXX, opened in 2006 should have been deleted due to age of account more than 8 years old and information is incorrect. This account was deleted by XXXX. 
Account XXXX XXXX, this is not my account. 
Account XXXX XXXX, account on this report should be deleted. I have a XXXX for them. ( attached ) Account XXXX XXXX XXXX, This account is paid in full not a charge off. 
Account XXXX XXXX XXXX, account not mines and has been deleted by XXXX . 
XXXX account is not mines and have dispted with experian for the last 5 years. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: it was payed-should have never been reported-credit protection if I could I would XXXX for this false report 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: It is basically impossible to get a hold of someone at Transunion. The phone number on my credit report is just a loop, and all they want to do is sell you products. I need to tell them they are reporting judgments that are not mine, and I 'm currently paying too much for my mortgage due to this. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: THIS COMPLAINT REPLACES Case number : XXXX : It appears that the credit bureaus are reporting inaccurate statuses for XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX tradelines. Never delinquent in 2008. Original creditor refused to remove this information. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My name is XXXX XXXX. Yesterday XXXX XXXX, 2015. I went inside of Wells Fargo Bank on XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX in XXXX, Fl XXXX. My reason for visiting the bank was to get another bank card. My old one was cancelled due to misused. I was told from XXXX of the customer rep. When visited a month ago or so.. That I had to wait thirty day 's. Keep my account clear. Before I can get another card. It 's now pass those thirty days. XXXX XXXX who was helping me was not able to help nor give me a temporary card because she was told by her supervisor XXXX. The same reason the guy rep told me. Not even to bother looking further into that it 's been pass thirty days etc.. Well once I got home I called Wells Fargo XXXX XXXX number to find out why that bank would n't give me a card and to see if they could send it to me. I was told to go back into that same branch and ask to speak to a supervisor. Because they could n't understand as well why they could n't give me another card nor help me. At the time I was n't able to go right back up there. So I called that branch and asked to speak to the supervisor who was the person who answered. XXXX. She remembered me once I explain and she was n't so polite. Very nonchalant and told me that I was n't gone be able to get a temporary card not today. That she will give XXXX my information to try again and give me a call back. I never received that called back. I called the XXXX XXXX again.. To see what else can I do. And they told me to try another branch which I did. The on off of XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX, fl I was in and out in XXXX minutes.. No problem whatsoever! And the lady who helped me said she did n't know why they could n't help me and even ask me what bank that was. I was not pleased at all nor did I appreciate the nonchalant attitude of the supervisor at that branch. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I recently submitted a request for investigation of an Acct Number : XXXX XXXX # XXXX XXXX I 've submitted enough information regarding the fraudulent account that 's open in my name I have provided information for your company to have carried out a reasonable investigation of this dispute. If you had investigated properly rather then using your XXXX system you would have noticed that this account is not mine which your companies have claimed to " Verified ''. Since you 've obviously neglected to investigate this account thoroughly I am demanding you remove this account off my profile. It is at this time that I will point out the in XXXX TransUnion, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ), and XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX et, the courts ruled each and every time that the CRA could n't merely " Parrot '' information from the creditors and collection agencies ... that they have conduct an independent REASONABLE investigation to ensure the validity of the debt and honesty/integrity of the creditors/XXXX in question. Sending out a generic form through the XXXX system that does n't even contain my reasons for the dispute is not reasonable. My correct name is XXXX XXXX NOT XXXX XXXX XXXX THOSE ACCOUNT DOES NOT BELONG TO ME I NEED THEM REMOVED OF MY CREDIT PROFILE If you do n't initiate an investigation regarding my dispute, as it is my right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, I will have to take legal action to protect my credit rating and myself. Which I 'm sure you are aware each violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows damages of {$10000.00} should this matter ends up in court. I look forward to an expedite resolution of this matter Thank you this account has been deleted then put back on my credit report your company reported that you have reviewed my complaint along with the information you previously provided regarding this issue. In order to verify the accuracy and completeness of XXXX # XXXX we initiated an investigation into the account. In response to the investigation, XXXX # XXXX was updated to reflect the remark of " Credit Card Lost or Stolen '', and the balance has been updated to reflect as {$0.00}. Then deleted the account then reposted the account again 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank of America has been requesting that we re-sign and re-notarize our mortgage documents because they detected formatting errors in the original documents that are preventing them from filing our agreement with the XXXX XXXX Court. 
Bank of America hired a third party agency to contact us and arrange to have their notary public come to our home to have a new set of revised mortgage documents signed and notarized. We requested that Bank of America send us a copy of XXXX our originally signed documents and a copy of the revised documents, highlighting the formatting errors that they mean to correct. We have made this formal request to them three times. 
The first time they requested this action was in XXXX 2015. At that time, we let the third party know that we wanted to know exactly what formatting errors are questionable to the court. The third party is not privy to that information and connected us with Bank of America to have our questions answered. We told Bank of America that we are not signing any new documents until they show us the specific, highlighted errors that they are revising. Bank of America said they would get back to us with that information. 
Instead, in XXXX 2015, we received a second set of documents with the identical request for signature and notarization to be arranged by a third party agency. Again, we told the third party agency that we only want to know the exact changes to be made to our mortgage documents before we sign anything. The third party agency began a series of harassing phone calls to schedule the notary public to meet us at our home. We asked them to discontinue this protocol until our questions to Bank of America are answered. 
In XXXX 2015, we received a third identical copy of the request to sign and notarize newly revised documents and the process with the third party agency began anew. We let the third party agency know that we were still awaiting Bank of America 's response to our question. 
Then, XX/XX/XXXX, a notary public randomly showed up at our residence and said they were sent by Bank of America to witness us sign a new set of revised mortgage documents. No one called to schedule this visit and we let the notary public know the history of what had transpired thus far and that we would not sign anything until Bank of America gave us a highlighted version of the documents to make clear what the formatting errors are and what would be revised in the new documents. 
We believe that Bank of America is trying to do something underhanded with regard to our mortgage. We understand that we agreed to assist in correcting any possible errors. However, we did not agree to sign new papers without knowledge of what specific mistakes were made and how the corrections impact our mortgage. 
Please have someone from your office contact me, or my husband, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, to discuss any possible recourse we might have and what our rights are under the law. 
Thank you very much. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX/XXXX/15 I received a phone message from XXXX XXXX to call XXXX about a credit card matter that, if not resolved, would result in a lien placed on my house. I called, she passed me on to the atty, XXXX XXXX @ XXXX. He told me I had a XXXX XXXX in arrears for {$43000.00} and could resolve the matter by paying him {$3000.00} on my credit card. I do n't have a XXXX XXXX. I did not pay him. Instead I told him that I was reporting this call as a scam. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: I received a complaint from RAB Performance Recoveries. I filed an answer and sent my request for discovery and interrogatories. The firm then filed a summary judgment motion saying there were no material facts and yet they have not even responded to my discovery, so no facts were known yet. I requested a postponement of their Motion and they claimed they would postpone it and even sent me a new court date. Then, instead they went to Court on the original date and got their judgment, as I was home still waiting for their discovery answers. They never postponed the matter, and lied. They got a judgment and started strong arm tactics and threats to extort money from me. I began research while I was paying {$100.00} each month. I finally found out how they got the judgment as there were so many other victoms on line who they had done the same thing to. 

I outlined all of the research I found and sent it to them via e mail, regular and certified mail. I said I had evidence of their wrongdoing and would go to the court with it upon motion. They responded by saying they would drop the case. So, I contacted the court who suggested I prepare a Warrant to Satisfy Judgment. I prepared it and sent it to be signed and filed by RAB Performance Recoveries. I never heard another single word, or received any correspondence whatsoever for about 6 years now. 

RAB now just pulled up the 8 year old file and has filed a motion to attach wages based on the Judgment they received through fraud. Turns out that they failed to file the Warrant on the order they received through trickery and defrauding of the court and myself. They also gave no credit in this new Motion for Garnishment for the {$1000.00} that they extorted from me, and I have long ago disposed of this file, as I truly thought it was a closed matter after not hearing a word for more than five years. 

Since they initilly falsified court papers to get the judgment in the first place, the judgment should be voided and the matter should be outside the statute of limitations at this point. 

I desperately need help in communicating their wrongdoing to both the public and the court as well as other victims of their scam. They operate a business by ignoring court rules, lying to debtors about what their intentions are and what remedies are available, lie about court hearing dates, fail to abide by court rules of discovery and are still in business not being held accountable for all of these illegal activities. They need to be stopped. thank you. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: We have a timeshare at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. We were contacted by XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX saying that they have someone interested in buying shares in order to have voting privileges at the resort. We participated for a while, including sending a wire transfer and providing our drivers license copies to them. Then, we began researching the companies and became skeptical. They placed many phone calls to us, but once we asked for all communication to be via email, reimbursement for our expenses, and to void on the deal, their communication has ceased. We have not received a refund, after them saying it would take 25-30 days. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: i am being called by MRS BPO every day. a machine makes the call. i am not the person they are looking for. it is the person who used to have this phone number. 
there is no way to get them to stop because the machine circles around and around. i have called their main number where the operator says she can not help me and transfers me to a number where nobody answers. please make them stop. when calls for the same person were made by human beings, i was able to convince them i am not the one who owes the debt. can not get the machine calls stopped. 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I recently received documents from Wells Fargo, Dated XXXX XXXX, 2015 which suggest that my investment property will be refinanced, however, I did not apply for a refinance or authorize Wells Fargo to do this on my behalf. There is also an internal email correspondence that was inadvertently included in my package, which is telling Wells Fargo employees that I am waiting for these documents and working with the Office of the President to refinance my loan. This is a lie. I would like this to be investigated. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX have my ssn wrong, when I had an original complaint they were unable to located my information due to the fact that they had my information wrong in the system. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I notice my credit had a negative reporting from this company. This debt was an older debt but they reported it as current charge off as of XXXX/XXXX/15 which isnt true. This was already sent to another agency who could validate the debt ad was removed off my credit. This is the XXXX time it has been reported. So now im being punished XXXX times for the same debt that was originally removed. Just because they purchase the debt doesnt mean they can lie and try and ruin your credit. Also i notice they do this all the time with many people. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Called XXXX and the associate told me that as far as she can see all my payments are made on time and are current. The date on my bank online credit monitor says date last reported as XX/XX/2015 and stated that I have 1- 30 day late which is this month she should see something. Also this account has autopay which would also make this impossible. She said that She could give me copies of statements but could not transfer my call or other wise resolve the dispute. My Phone is XXXX email XXXXXXXXXXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response