AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: My installment loan through Wells Fargo has always been paid on time with no issues for the life of the loan. In XXXX 2015 I was locked out of my on-line account and could not resolve the issue or log-in. Therefore I was not able to make my monthly loan payment on time as I always have. Prior to XXXX days late, I finally spoke to someone in person ( their automation system is horrible both on-line and via phone if you do not know your account number, etc ) and told them I mailed a check and asked specifically about it being reported late. I was told that it was noted, not an issue and I did not need to worry about it. 

A few days later I got a credit notification that I had a late payment. I immediately called Wells Fargo and had them reset my online account and paid again, effectively XXXX-paying for XXXX. I complained to my agent and asked to speak to a supervisor ( which I was hung up on ). After calling back I was told that there was nothing they could do and said to contact the credit agencies. 

I have tried disputing the fraudulent claim on my account XXXX through XXXX without resolve. I am desperate to have Wells Fargo fix their error as this lowered my credit score over XXXX points and I am in the process of building a home. They had the audacity to call me and ask if I wanted a car loan! 

This is my last step prior to seeking legal action against Wells Fargo and/or the credit reporting agencies. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian is reporting inaccurate information on XXXX collection accounts ; XXXX account # XXXX and XXXX. They are showing as if they are new collections and they are not. This is affecting my credit scores negatively. Account XXXX was last paid on XX/XX/XXXX. Account XXXX was last paid on XX/XX/XXXX. These errors need to be corrected immediately or the accounts deleted off my credit file. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On my XXXX credit report. XXXX / child support has not been updated. Please update payment amount, due amount and payment history, amount is much lower now and I have made current payments for several years thank you 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Applied for a home refinance with my current lender BofA XXXX 2015 and due to gaps in their process my credit report expired and at some point reran my credit and are now refusing to proceed with the loan, since XXXX of our credit scores is XXXX and their minimum threshold is XXXX. The delay in getting this done in an appropriate amount of time was due to documented and admitted gaps in BofA 's processes. I have emails with approval from their senior management stating loan is approved. I have a good faith statement that they sent to after they had rerun credit and knew it was below XXXX because they said would proceed with the loan due to their delays in the process. Now 6 months later I get a call stating that some committee is not approving my loan with since not at XXXX credit score. This leaves me and my family in a very precarious financial situation since the intent of the refinance was to combine a XXXX and a XXXX and credit card debts to make our monthly payment more affordable and which they had agreed to do and kept us engaged with requiring information again and again and promising that it would get done, which is all we want. See attached documents and approvals. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: It is impossible to access information to ascertain my balance on this card or the transactions that were recorded against the card. 

Information is supposed to be available by phone or on the Web site prepaid.citi.com. However, I am locked out of the Web site with no information on who to contact for support and the phone number provided on the back of the card for support is an automated system that will not respond to my card number and provides no option to actually speak to a human. 

Citi has obviously set this up to make it extremely dificult to utilize the prepaid card and track the balance. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX agreed to remove all collections from the credit report and the reporting agency refused. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: As stated by the FDCPA ( A debt collector may not contact you at inconvenient times or places, such as before XXXX in the morning or after XXXX at night, unless you agree to it. And collectors may not contact you at work if they 're told ( orally or in writing ) that you 're not allowed to get calls there. ) This morning, XXXX/XXXX/2015, I received XXXX phone calls prior to XXXX from Gateway One Lending XXXX XXXX at XXXX, XXXX, XXXX and XXXX, evidenced by phone records and screen shots of my call log taken on my cell phone. I also received an email from XXXX XXXX at XXXX. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: I began shopping for mortgages and applied through several lenders. XXXX, Sebonic Financial ( NMLS # XXXX ), seemed to be a good online option. The broker, himself, was actually very pleasant to work with. However, as part of the application process, Sebonic requires a credit card to hold funds for an appraisal. I applied on XXXX and received an email that an appraiser had been assigned on XXXX. In that email it said that I needed, as the borrower, to schedule to have the appraisal done within ( 7 ) days. However by XXXX the appraisal had been assigned and conducted, without my or my agent 's knowledge/authorization. It is also worth mentioning that I informed Sebonic the same day that I had signed with another lender, whether or not that 's a coincidence or not, I 'm not sure. Additionally, at no point had I signed an intent to proceed with Sebonic. I have since been charged as appraisal fee of {$430.00} and told that is a non-refundable charge. I 'm not an expert in the mortgage process but this strikes me as a serious ethical issue requiring a refund of the appraisal fee immediately. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: I contacted USAA Bank to discuss the interest rate on my Master Card. My hope was that they would consider lowering the rate to help a customer pay down their balance. First, I understand this is their choice and had they said no because it was company regulations I would have been unhappy but accepted it. What they claim is that government regulations do not allow them to lower the rate. They said specifically that XXXX XXXX in the credit card act of 2009 does not allow. I read through that and it never mentioned lowering rates, only increasing them. 

In summary, my complaint is that they are misusing government regulations. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: I have XXXX loans that I have partners. The partners were collecting the rents and making the mortgage payments with the rents. In XXXX of 2015 the partners stopped making the payments unknown to me and the loans are in default. I was never notified by Wells Fargo of the status of the loans. I only found out after pulling my credit report. I was contacted By an XXXX XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX telling me that Wells Fargo needed me to fill out some paperwork to re-fi the loan and get the payments lower that our partners had request this. He never told me that the loan payments were not being paid or ask for them to be paid. In XXXX 2015 I finally received the paperwork and as I began to read it I began to question what this paperwork was about because it talked about the loan in default. I immediately called and spoke with a gentleman whom gave me that status of the loan. I then contacted Wells Fargo office of the president and offered to pay off the loans if they would restore my credit since I was never contacted or notified by them that the payments were not being made. I followed all the necessary steps and I just received notice from the office of the president that they would not be restoring my credit and they they had no obligation to notify me that my loan was not current. I ca n't believe this to be true. they had my information and never sent me one thing. They only sent it to XXXX my partner. I just ca n't believe that the bank has no obligation to notify all parties listed on the loan if there is a payment issue. Is this the case? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX I received XXXX emails regarding my account, both explaining that there were charges pending against my account which would not be able to clear due to nonsufficient funds and I would be charged {$25.00} per item unless I made a deposit into my account to cover the drafts before XXXX on XXXX XXXX. That same evening I made a deposit via the bank-owned ATM sufficient to cover both drafts. The next day I received notification that my account was charged XXXX overdraft fees of {$25.00} each. I quickly went into a branch and was told that due to the age of the ATM. the deposit made would not be processed until XXXX that day. As the teller was unable to assist me any further, I proceeded to call the bank 's office. 

I spoke with XXXX representatives and despite my assertion that regardless of the age of the ATM, the deposit was made by the time indicated on the email notices received and therefore should be credited to my account accordingly. Further, I pointed out that the Expedited Funds Availability Act requires the XXXX {$200.00} of a deposit that is not already subject to next-day availability to be made available by the XXXX business day following the day of deposit. The deposit amount at the ATM was {$20.00} in cash. 

They were willing to remove XXXX of the {$25.00} overdraft fees, but not both. I argue that according to notifications sent to me, timing of my deposit and Reg CC guidelines, I should be reimbursed for both {$25.00} fees. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I received a letter from this company claiming that I owe them money and to my knowledge this company has never provided services to me or for me and I 've never entered into a contractual agreement to pay them for anything 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am not a minor. The bill collector called my parents and told them I was behind on my car and how much I owed. I contacted the company and advised them that they violated my right by calling a number they were previously told not to call and then have out my private financial information. They just did the same thing again. So they have been told multiple time not to call my parents, they still have, and now on two occasions have discussed my personal financial information and debt with them. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: fradulent 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My loan went into default with XXXX XXXX XXXX for almost a year. I was working with XXXX to get a loan modification however after XXXX unsuccessful attempts to resubmit the same documents, we finally just gave up. It was causing undue hardship and mental stress to continue to provide documents again and again only to be stalled in the process. It 's very clear that XXXX was using stall tactics so that they would not have to move forward with the loan medication. In early 2015, I received a letter from XXXX that the loan was sold to BSI financial services. I contacted BSI who advised that they own the loan. I explained to them that I was continuing to receive foreclosure documents from the courts. BSI further explained that they now own the loan and will allow me to short sale my home. I advised BSI that I 'm not going to submit documents again XXXX times only to be stalled once again. BSI assured me that I did n't need to fill out any paperwork and instead they would connect me with XXXX of their preferred realtors to look at the home for potential short sale. Also, I would like to add that BSI advised that if the home did not sell within 60-90 days that they would accept a deed in lieu of foreclosure. They also advised that they would not hold me responsible for the difference whether its a deed or short sale. The realtor and BSI approved the short sale for XXXX and house was listed. Approximately 30-45 days later I received mail that a foreclosure judgment had been granted by the local courts. I contacted my realtor who advised that she would contact BSI to see if we could appeal to additional time to short sale the house. I never heard from her again. This week I received mail from the courts that BSI bought my home for XXXX. In essence, they sold the loan to themselves so that they can resell at a higher value. This is both unethical and fraudulent. They lied to me throughout the whole process and I seriously question if the realtor was in on it from the very beginning and has received some sort of kick-back for assessing the home 's value for them from the start. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Dear Regional Acceptance, I included the following documents : RAC Payment Admin - EZPAY - Phone Payment Confirmation Notice # XXXX am disputing a missed payment currently reflected on my credit reports ( attached ). 
On XXXX XXXX, 2014, I made an EZPAY Phone payment on my account in the amount of {$470.00} Confirmation # XXXX. However, in XXXX of 2014, my account was reported to the XXXX major credit bureaus missing ( XXXX ) payment. 
Please see the attached confirmation and please report to the XXXX major credit bureaus ACCURATELY as NO MISSED PAYMENTS since inception of the loan. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am receiving calls from a debt collection company for a non-existent debt. I originally filed a complaint to comsumerfinance.gov XX/XX/2014. The company'w response was that my name was closely associated with one they had a contract with. They admitted they had no contract with my name or s.s. number and said they had removed my number from their system. However, to this day they continue to call me and leave messages that I need to contact someone in their company about a debt. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I tried to short sale my home XX/XX/XXXX due to financial hardship. BofA agreed to the short sale but there was a purchase money XXXX mortgage ( also with Bank of America ) and they refused. The home went to foreclosure XX/XX/XXXX and sold back to original investor XX/XX/XXXX. BofA keeps reporting a balance due on my credit report which is harming my credit score and Inaccurate. In California Purchase money XXXX mortgages are supposed to be charged off when the property is liquidated. There is no recourse in this state. They are reporting a charge off but with a Balance. They keep changing what there reporting on my credit also. I have XXXX credit reports with them reporting different things on each one. I feel like there purposely trying to damage my credit by repeatedly reporting wrong dates and balances. I 'm sick of dealing with BofA, they are crooks! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have received a XXXX/XXXX/2015 letter and various phone calls from Central Credit Services, LLC attempting to collect a debt from XXXX in XXXX. These are most likely about a XXXX services accrued in a Bundled service. I have statements from XXXX showing that the statements are paid in full. I previously filed a complaint with the FTC regarding this manner and I thought it was taken care of. Now I am receiving bills at my new location in XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: barclays bank placed an account with their attorney who consequently filed suit for a credit card account that Barclays refused to negotiate a reduced interest payment plan so that we could pay the principal balance at a XXXX interest rate for 5 years. 

XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Pa filed suit against us in the beginning of XXXX according to a letter we received XXXX, however we were never notified or served a notice of a court date. They instead served our documents to another individual being sued by Barclays and we in turn received his documents. Docket XXXX. They further advised that they are entering a judgement in this matter on us. They were sent a letter by me on XXXX via certified mail concerning this matterDue to their error, we never had an opportunity to present our side and they also compromised our personal information including address etc and financial information to an individual that we do not know. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I took out a construction loan to be converted into fixed rate mortgage loan in XXXX XXXX. In XXXX XXXX, I received a letter from Washington Federal that my mortgage rate will be a fixed at 4.875 % for 30 years with a 1 % pre-payment penalty provision prior to XXXX XXXX. I sent them a letter explaining that I was offered, in open market, a 30-year-fixed-rate of 3.75 % -- and with XXXX-fees-or-costs. 
When I signed the initial papers in XX/XX/XXXX I was told that the bank would be able to match market-rates for fixed-rate-mortgage in the future. But the bank refused to match the new rate, despite their initial verbal promises. I was left with a choice of paying nearly 1 % higher rate to Washington Federal for next 30 years to save the 1 % penalty, or paying 1 % penalty and saving 1 % yearly for next XXXX years, by refinancing elsewhere. The decision had to be immediate because the rates can change rapidly. 
I had to pay 1 % penalty to Washington Federal to get a 1 % lower fixed-rate for XXXX years. This was completely unnecessary if they had followed through on their initial promise that they would match market rates for fixed rate mortgage to avoid refinancing. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I obtained {$1000.00} cash advance x XXXX on XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX/XXXX/15. When I received my statement in XXXX, 2015, I immediately repaid the {$3000.00} plus associated fees. Furthermore, I have paid my account in full every month in 2015. For some reason, citibank has billed me interest on the XXXX/XXXX/15, XXXX/XXXX/15, and XXXX/XXXX/15 statement, totalling about {$240.00}. Furthermore, the current statement shows the balance of the cash advance as INCREASING as interest is accrued. But the cash advance was PAID OFF IMMEDIATELY, along with the entire balance of the card every month. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have paid for the same debt for XXXX in XXXX 2014 to XXXX debt collector. Now Ehnanced Recover Company is trying to continue to collect the debt wheich has bee paid in full. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My complaint is against Bank of America Merchant Account Services. I received a call from their representative ( XXXX ) this afternoon regarding my newly established merchant account. XXXX called from XXXX. I was advised that my merchant account was flagged because of the type of services that I/my business offer. XXXX advised me that I am an unqualified/high risk business and that my account is under review. 
I advised XXXX that I was very concerned about his call because of the long standing relationship that I have with Bank of America and had with my former merchant provider. I have banked with Bank of America for XXXX years and was often solicited by numerous representatives both at my office and in their branches. So I did n't understand how Bank of America could first offer me a merchant account, approve the account, send the equipment, allow my business to process credit and debit card fees only to then contact me less than XXXX days later to inform me that my merchant account with them could potentially be closed. 
During the completion of the merchant account application with the Bank of America representative on XXXX XXXX 2015 I detailed my long standing relationship, my account history and revisited all the services that were offered to my business over the years as well as the visits to my office that Bank of America representatives made to offer my staff checking account services and other additional services to me. 
After terminating my eight year relationship with another merchant services provider to accept the offer from Bank of America, it is unclear to me how Bank of America could have approved me for a XXXX year lease of the equipment and the account only to be told XXXX days afterwards that my account could potentially be terminated for no wrongdoing on my part. 
I am confused as to why Bank of America marketed services/products to me with intimate knowledge of my personal accounts, business accounts and business model ; then processed and completed a XXXX hour interview/application ; for the application to take the bank more than XXXX days to process ( time for which I am sure they used to complete their due diligence and to qualify me and my business ) ; then to approve me but to call less than XXXX days later and tell me that my business is now high risk/unqualified! 
The termination of my merchant account with Bank of America would cause an enormous financial hardship on my small business and should not be something that I should have to endure. Furthermore the processing of my application has impacted my personal credit profile and could affect my ability to acquire a new merchant account in the future. 
With that said I hope to keep this Bank of America merchant account to circumvent any unnecessary financial hardship to my life and to my business. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: greentree mortgage servicing call me at XXXX from this number : XXXX. this is their number have responded to call from this number before. I fell that they harass me repeatedly over the years however this was the last straw calling me at this time of the night. My mortgage is current although I do you the grace period allowed under the mortgage terms which is I pay a late fee if late after the XXXX of the month. Most of the time I receive repeated call after the XXXX of the month until the show in their system as paid. I have no problem with a company calling however to continually do this each and every month is a little much. my thoughts. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX # XXXX {$620.00} ... .i have contacted this collection agency and they can not verify this account as mine but it comes back as verified with transunion ... ... method of verification is wrong when i disputed this account ... 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response