AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: My account went over XXXX in overdraft fee for charges that processing on my account before XXXX electronic checks were charge to my account. When I went back to take a look at my account I notice that the items that was in my account process somehow came out of a negative charge balance on my account. When the XXXX checks came into my account my account had fund in it with XXXX items processing. Overnite I check my account and XXXX elerctronic checks that came into my account somehow was processing and the items the was slide using my debit card was in the negative status and not the XXXX checks. I called and ask the rep on the phone what happened to my surprise the rep stated that the checks camae in before the items that I slide on my debit card going back and forth with the rep stating that was not true that rep became to tell me that is how it goes. Then I asked how was I charged XXXX overdrafted fee I thought I was only charged XXXX fee and then after 5 days I would have another XXXX added if that XXXX was not paid for. He then told me no bank of America charge you {$35.00} per item by government law. I then let the rep know that I have had this account for sometime and there has never been over draft fee on my account like this. So then I check my account on the 3rd day of overdraft and seen there was a 5 day over draft fee add and then another and then another. I called the bank the rep said that is right and there is nothing I could do about it. Now my account is XXXX in over draft fee with my account went negative on the XXXX of XXXX. I ca n't take this anymore I have been paying fee more than using my account. I do n't know what is going on but I need to report this because there is something seriously wrong with there system with charging these fee incorrectly to the consumers account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: debts are still reporting in the credit file. however, debts were paid back 2013 as part of settlement. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a mortgage with Pentagon Federal Credit Union with a balance of approximately {$130000.00}. I applied in early XXXX for a re-finance in the amount of {$160000.00} on an adjustable XXXX rate mortgage and stipulated a Title Service company here in Alaska as my choice of service. After the loan was approved and scheduled for closing - I was notified at the last minute another Title company would service the loan. I objected ( by email ) because it would cost more - they said they would lower some fees to make up for it and they did ( but not for as much as promised initially - again by email ). 
Also questioned why we are paying {$1000.00} for an appraisal that cost {$700.00} ( which is why we wanted to choose our appraiser and Title company ) basically told verbally by " XXXX '' it was a service fee tacked on by XXXX (?? ) Signing was scheduled at our home for XXXX. Prior to that I requested copies of all documents we would be signing. I asked more than XXXX time by email. 
From XXXX XXXX we received XXXX different disclosures. 
We signed on XXXX and was told funds would be available on the XXXX - then the XXXX ... 
Was given an electronic deposit tracking # and told was made n the XXXX after XXXX. 
As of today the XXXX still no funds after repeatedly requesting by emails starting XXXX As of today no accounting received for our request for clarification of " changes '' we were told would result in funds received As of today we have not received ANY copies of any documents we signed. 
Emails attached along with copies of documents sent to us. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank of America is issuing inaccurate statements. I have XXXX balance transfers, XXXX with a promo short-term zero interest rate ( after the. Under the Interest Charge Calculations section of my statement, under " balance subject to interest rate '' it shows a zero balance for each of the balance transfers. This is not correct. I have several thousand dollars subject to that special zero-percent interest rate. While the special promo rate happens to be XXXX at the moment, this will change when the promo time period is over. 

Every other credit card company I have ever had a balance transfer with shows the actual balance in this section of the statement, even when the rate is zero. Right now I have no idea of much of my actual balance is currently subject to this promo rate. When I called Bank of America about the issue, I spoke to supervisor who said they used to show the correct balance amount there, but it was changed last year, she did n't know why, they had had a lot of complaints, but while they knew they were providing inaccurate information to the consumer, they were not going to change it and will continue to provide inaccurate information. She said that If I wanted to know my balance for each balance transaction each month, I would just have to call each month since they would not provide the statement regarding my correct balance on my statements. 
This is completely ridiculous and counter to the information they are supposed to provide me so that I can make good financial decisions. As I said, every other credit card company provides this information correctly on their statements, and by their own admission, BofA used to provide this information correctly. 

I 've attached a sample of my BofA statement and my statement from XXXX bank. As you can see, the BofA statement gives me incorrect information in that it is stating that I have a XXXX balance subject to the promo interest rate. this is completely incorrect. The XXXX statement presents the exact same situation correctly. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am filing this on behalf of my mother, who is incapable of using the computer. My mother is the victim of identity theft. My mother has been sick and hospitalized over the past year and had been cared for by an aide with whom she became " close '' with. She trusted the aide implicitly and gave her full access to her apartment. My mother is frail, has much trouble in XXXX, and is XXXX. Besides her physical problems she has been hospitalized several times when her XXXX XXXX spiked due to anxiety It was a shock when my mother was informed by the Bank of America in XXXX, 2015 that her account was overdrawn and there was a list of suspicious checks that did not seem to be hers. When I came down to help, I identified even more checks that were appeared to be forged. All of these checks were made out to the aide 's name or to " Cash ''. 
While I had numerous conversations with bank employees and filed reports of these checks since XXXX, the bottom line is that the bank denied our claim. Their explanation was " timeliness and same wrong doer ''. According to the bank, the claim had to be first made within 60 days of the first suspicious check, which was in XXXX, 2015, as that would have prevented any of the other forged checks to follow. 
The problem for us is that my mother had no reason to suspect foul play and had not looked at her statements. She was in a vulnerable state and just worried about her health, so she was not focused on her bank statements. She was trusting that everything in the part of her life was fine. No one in the family suspected the aide and this was a shock to all of us. This is not uncommon for victims of exploitation, and it is why we depend on banking institutions to compare signatures. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: These accounts need to be deleted because they are not mine and they have not been validated. I have disputed these accounts with Experian numerous times. The response I get back is that the information has been 'verified '. I contacted each one of these collection agencies and I never received a response from the collection agency to 'Validate ' the account. With that being said I am sure that Eperian did not get a verification from the collection agencies pertaining to the collection agencies on my credit report that do not belong to me. XXXX is not a way to verify an account. I requested there '' method of verification '' meaning who did the physically talk to at the collection agency. I want to know what paperwork Experian have showing that this account was validated and verified. The person they spoke with, what department, what day and time, and the paperwork they have showing ownership of the collection account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This is an official complaint against Dietech Financial in conducting an illegal and wrongful foreclosure action on said property on the alleged date of XXXX XXXX, XXXX, in which I believe was backdated to legitimize the sale. During the merger between Ditech Financial, LLC and Greentree Servicing, LLC, there was no effort by the above entities to offer any resolution or modification. Neither party provided me with any remedies or provide any full disclosure of the loan transaction. It is my contention that no sale took place on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Prior to execution of any Deed Under Power, the law-firm retained by Ditech Financial told me on the telephone that the Sale of my property was cancelled. Besides the failure to provide any remedies or working out any resolution, Dietech and Greentree failed to adhere to CFPB 's new servicing rules : Failure to adhere to rigorous servicing transfer requirements Failure to comply with mortgage servicing rules Failed to engage in efforts to preserve home ownership Failed to address any redress and Grevances Allowed the merger to maintain and sustain consistency with CFPB rules Failed to provide adaquate notice to the homeowner. 
Failed to provide full disclosure to XXXX of the loan transaction and underwriting of the loan I filed a Notice of Rescission pursuant 15 USC 1635. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX send me a renewal policy XX/XX/XXXX.The policy was much higher than the previous year. I decided to go with another company and I did not realize that I had to give decline in writing. 
A collection company R.M.S ( Receivable Management Services Corporation ) contacted me to set up a payment plan.I was contacted by XXXX XXXX XXXX. Agent I came to a payment agreement that XXXX XXXX negotiated with XXXX XXXX. 
The agreement of XXXX payments of {$160.00} totaling {$1200.00}. My first payment was on XXXX XXXX 2015. XXXX, XXXX, XXXX all checks were electronic and everything went smoothly. XXXX I send a check on the XXXX XXXX for the regular {$160.00}. I received a text notification that my account was overdrawn on Monday morning. I looked into my account and noticed that {$1000.00} had been deducted instead of the regular {$160.00}. I went directly to the branch and my banker contacted XXXX XXXX and asked to reverse the excess funds. XXXX thing happened XXXX we could not access the account as it had been closed. Keep in mind this was XXXX XXXX time on Monday morning. No one including XXXX was willing to help in any way as she was well aware of our agreement fully knowing that there was a serous over pay.After many attempts in the branch and within the coming days i tried with no success as no one was willing to discuss this.Every phone call was transferred to another person which led to nobody and finally it disconnected. The anger and helplessness was emotionally upsetting. Thankfully after evaluating my problem XXXX reversed the payment. I was told to close my account and open a new account. In XXXX I received a call from XXXX XXXX who said I owe money at first I could not believe she would call after everything that I went through.She was not apologetic. i was so disgusted I wanted nothing to do with them. I received a letter and called to be told that it was given to a law firm. 
I have not contacted the law firm .I need your help as they lied to me on several issues. They tried to grab money illegally and thanks to XXXX they saved me would have no recourse finacially to is to expensive to obtain a law firm.. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My loan servicer was transferred effective XXXX XXXX from XXXX ( Sterns Lending ) to XXXX. I never received notice of this transfer ; I therefore logged on to the original servicers website on XXXX XXXX and made a payment. I received an e-mail confirmation of acceptance for that payment. On XXXX XXXX, 2016 when the money had not been debited from my checking account I called to follow-up. It was at this point that I was made aware that my loan servicing was transferred as I never received the paperwork in the mail. There was NOTHING on the website notifying me of the loan transfer and I was allowed to submit a payment on XXXX XXXX, 2016, the date of the transfer. The individual I spoke to said that they would transfer my payment to the new servicer within 10 days. At this point I call the new loan servicer, XXXX, and via automated message on XXXX XXXX am notified that they do not have my loan information. I waited for more than 10 days and still no payment debited from my checking account. Additionally, the new loan service had called twice asking me why I had not made my payment for XXXX. On XXXX XXXX I again call the original mortgage servicer. On this call I am told that no, they will not be debiting my checking account for the payment even though I received a payment confirmation. Per the CFPB, the servicer should either transfer the payment to the transferee servicer for application to a borrower 's mortgage loan account, or return the payment to the person that made the payment and notify such person of the proper recipient of the payment. In my opinion neither of these actions occurred as the original servicer never once notified me that my payment was in fact not accepted ( although I received an electronic confirmation of acceptance ) and thus due to the non-acceptance needed to make my payment to the new company. Only though my own continued calling was the correct information eventually provided. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have received numerous calls from ( XXXX ) XXXX and ( XXXX ) XXXX, both of which belong to Creditors Collection Service. However, I only know that because I searched the numbers online. The calls to my phone either do no leave a message, or the message is a recording of a man leaving only the phone number ( XXXX ) XXXX. He does not say anything else in the message. I have records of nine calls since XXXX/XXXX/2016, but there were more before those. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX filed a Tax Lien, which was originally sent to old address. Recently it was forwarded to my new addressed via USPS. I immediately called XXXX XXXX Tax collector and paid the tax lien the day I was notified and requested they update address as I was not receiving tax bill. The representative I spoke with confirmed they had old addressed and would be sending out new docs with correct address, which I completed. He also confirmed that they did not report this to my credit, as account is now paid in full ( Removed tax lien ). However, this is showing up as public record/tax lien on my credit reports. Tax collector advise to dispute with credit reporting as they are not reporting it. I am disputing this as account is paid, and tax lien should be removed as it in not accurate information reporting. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have a mortgage with DITECH which is a XXXX mortgage. It was first with XXXX Then it was transferred so many times without giving me a goodbye notice or anything. Now Ditech is stating that I owe them XXXX that is not accurate. I sent a validation request to Ditech as permitted under the law of the FDCPA. Ditech refuse to validate the debt. This is theft. I do not XXXX please help me 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: I have several account that are reporting on my credit file incorrectly. 
1 XXXX XXXX have me listed as late never late 2 XXXX fraud account not mine 3 XXXX XXXX fraud not mine 4 XXXX XXXX fraud not mine 5 bankrupcy not mine must be mixed file 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian is reporting a tax lien with incorrect information. I 've called and sent in requests for information to be removed with no help. They continue to report inaccurate information which has hurt my personal life moving forward. I have been denied credit and or rental requests due to this inaccurate information. They need to reveal the verification they 've done or remove asap. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Essentially I got tricked into selling my house in a manner I was unaware of. Instead of the buyer paying off my mortgage and getting their own, it got put into some sort of owner financed deal which left the mortgage in my name. I ca n't have this, because of this mortgage account I can not get approved for any loans because my income to debt ratio is so far off. 
The mortgage is also in extremely poor shape and borderline to foreclosure again. I am unable to contact any of the other parties in the deal and the contact I did have with them did not help. I have the right to foreclose the property if the account is in default but its been in default for over 6 months and no one will let me exercise my rights in the contract. 

Wells Fargo has the mortgage and they have the ability to end this situation immediately via my original loan but I can not get in touch with someone who can take any action or even look into this. As long as payments come in, late or not or wrong amount even, they just keep the loan current. I also get phone calls non stop, everyday from Wells Fargo wanting me to make the payment which I have not made in over 3 years. My family is basically being held hostage by this mortgage, we need a newer car and a home and we ca n't get it. The reason I sold this house is because my wife was XXXX and XXXX throughout the XXXX, all this did was make things much worse. Everywhere I turn for help I get sent somewhere else and I do n't have {$270.00} an hour for an attorney. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Called my place of employment. The caller said that this was a personal business matter and asked for my social security number twice and then asked for my birthdate to comfirm it was me that they needed to speak with. I asked the caller what does this pertain to and his name and company who he is with and he would not tell me until I gave him my social security number and birthdate. I told him that this is a scam and I am not giving such information out and I told him to stop calling or I would report him. I work for the government and this caused a security breach within my department due to the nature of this call. I was highly embarrassed and my supervisors are all concerned due the the nature of this call. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 'm a victim of identity theft as a result of this there were some inquiries made without my knowledge or consent, i have sent out numerous letters to Transunion with supporting documents, they are ignoring me and they still have n't removed these items that clearly do not belong to me, this is very frustrating and disappointing and I need help to remove these inaccurate items, i 'm attaching the letter that i sent out to the bureaus 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a Citi Card XXXX account the balance for which I have always paid by the due date. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I received an urgent call and text message about a possible security breach on the account. I called the customer service office and was informed of XXXX charges on the account ( XXXX from the same company ) for purchases I had not made. When I confirmed that these charges were not mine, the customer service representative told me that Citi Card was closing my account. I objected arguing that this action would cause significant problems because of my automatic payment creditors. But the customer service representative would not budge. I then asked to speak to a supervisor and was transferred to XXXX. As I had told the previous customer service representative, I told XXXX I check my account every week so I could quickly inform them of any security breach. But he said the company policy required the closing of the account. And again, XXXX refused to reconsider his decision when I complained about the automatic payments. When XXXX would not change the decision, I asked for a refund of the remaining portion of my annual membership fee. XXXX explicitly told me I would receive a refund of that amount. 
Citi Card closed my account on XXXX XXXX, XXXX but never refunded my membership fee. 
I, then, engaged in a lengthy back-and-forth with the Customer Service Department at Citi Cards. At first, the representatives simply ignored my complaint. Then I received a response that my request was untimely because refunds were only possible within 30 days from the mailing of the statement with that charge. ( I was charged {$95.00} on XXXX XXXX, XXXX ). When I reiterated that Citi Card 's supervisor XXXX had told me the unused portion of the fee would be reimbursed, I received a message apologizing for the " incorrect information you received. '' Then, when I asked if Citi Cards was acknowledging that XXXX had made a misrepresentation, I received a message from XXXX, a senior account specialist, who asserted that " Our records do not show that you were advised that the membership fee would be credited. '' 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response