AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: Homeowner is currently 3 months behind on its Mortgage. Homeowner situation is of a temporary nature. Homeowner is ready and willing to commence payments. Servicer refuses to consider a request for a partial claim, forbearance or other workout solution. Homeowner believes there is a simple fix to this servicer made complex issue. A payment plan that will bring homeowner to a current position will resolve issue. 



Homeowner is placing Freedom Mortgage on notice, that I am " putting the world on notice '' of the security interest in order to make the secured parties ' rights fully enforceable is known as " perfection. " Secured Party Creditor, which is the Homeowner and will be referred to Homeowner herein after, has the right to Exercise Judicial Enforcement and request damages for the trespass against the Debtor Property, which is exempt from levy and in accord to XXXX Statement # XXXX 2015 XXXX. The Secure Party is the rightful holder in due course. Secure Party has a superior lien against the property in question and is above all others who profess to have an interest. Any attempt to commence a foreclosure proceeding will be consider a commercial injury and will be subject to the collateral value stated in the XXXX XXXX XXXX stated herein. 

A workout solution would be beneficial to all parties. If a workout solution is not met, the Homeowner will exercise its rights under XXXX XXXX accordingly. 

The Homeowner desires a workout solution. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I revoked Nationwide 's authorization to debit my account several months ago when my insurance and taxes went up. They continued taking {$330.00} out of my account every two weeks for a couple months after several requests for them to stop. I finally worked with XXXX XXXX XXXX and home mortgage and determined that XXXX was taking my money and placing it in a secondary account. Since XXXX XXXX does n't accept partial payments, my mortgage was n't being paid, resulting in a letter saying I owed them {$1600.00}. I paid this out of pocket and XXXX XXXX opened a fraud claim against Nationwide. My bank credited me {$990.00} out of the {$1300.00} that they determined that Nationwide owed me. I 've been waiting for the additional funds that Nationwide owes me, when I receive a letter from them stating that I owe them {$320.00} or they will turn me over to a collection agency. I called Nationwide in regards to the matter and they claim that they were paying my mortgage, when XXXX XXXX home mortgage confirmed they were not. I have spent in excess of 12 hours dealing with Nationwide and XXXX XXXX home mortgage trying to resolve this matter and thought it was resolved through XXXX XXXX, until Nationwide tries this deplorable attempt to further extort fraudulent funds from myself. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This is an old account. I made attempts to contact the collection agency to work out a payment plan which they did n't accept. I 've since received numerous calls. It has become uncomfortable and distracting taking these called while I 'm at work. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I am in the middle of a refi and there is a collection on my credit that is not mine. XXXX is the original creditor and they have given me a letter confirming this is not my debt ( I am actually a current customer of XXXX in good standing ) I contacted the collection company ERC and they refuse to give me anything in writing confirming that they will remove the negative reporting. I need a letter from them so that I can continue the refinance of my home loan as this is affecting the rate I can qualify for. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: The date shown as the 'date opened ' is incorrect. This date is years after the correct date and impairs my status. I need all incorrect information removed, please. The original creditor was XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I applied for a home equity line of credit from Bank of America mortgage department on or about XXXX XXXX, 2015. 
After months of delay, we were told by XXXX XXXX, manager, XXXX x XXXX that they should have the information available by Friday XXXX XXXX. They did not call and we have not heard a word since. The following week they were called and told to stop the application and return all of the reams of information that they required immediately. 
Again no response. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Trans Union has numerous inaccurate balance accounts and has reported accounts discharged in BK. These accounts were not included in my 2010 BK and were paid in full. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I received a call on Friday from Renton Collections saying this was their XXXX attempt to collect a debt. I had not received any notices so asked that they send me the information as I was not willing to pay something without doing my due diligence to make sure it was handled appropriately. The supposed manager got extremely rude, was telling me to just pay the debt and was completely hostile. Keep in mind I had just paid a {$1200.00} bill that was removed from their queue because it had been wrongly sent through our insurance. I wanted to insure this was billed properly since I had n't received notice, not to avoid payment and she continued with the verbal abuse. When I asked to speak to her manager she informed me she was the manager and the only other person above her was the owner and they would n't send me to them. I have no issue paying a bill I owe, but wont just send someone money without any sort of paper trail. Extremely unprofessional and after reading all the similar complaints online, I ca n't believe they are allowed to be in business. Verbal abuse is not ok. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: On my report from XXXX there is a listing from U.S. Bank my bankruptcy filed on XXXX/XXXX/2012 included this account. Fair Credit Reporting Act makes clear that a debt discharged in bankruptcy must be listed as having a 0 balance. FTC OSC section 607, item 6 states : " A consumer report may include an account that was discharged in bankruptcy, as long as it reports a zero balance due to reflect the fact that the consumer is no longer liable for the discharged debt and there should be no additional reporting after the bankruptcy filing date. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Wells Fargo without any form of notice and after refusing to discuss alternative solutions has my home for sale on XXXX/XXXX/2015. I have applied for a modification and submitted all request documents and have not been contacted by them. My title work from the date of purchase does not indicate that Wells Fargo has any ownership right to my property and I have sent them a Qualified Written Request ( QWR ). Wells Fargo has refused to tell me who the attorney is handling the upcoming sale of my property nor have they informed the other owner of the property, this party is on title but not on the debt. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The closing papers that were sent me are dated XXXX/XXXX/15. That means that I contacted BB & T before that, to start the process and I do remember that it took some time for me to get the closing papers sent to me. With that being said, my original call was around or before XXXX/XXXX/15 to the loan officer at BB & T. I can not prove what the exact date is because it was a phone call and I did not think that I would have to create a history log. 

Around XXXX/XXXX/15 I called BB & T XXXX office to complain and got what they call " the chairman 's line ''. This is when a manager above my loan officer called me. I informed him of the long delay in processing my loan and that I now have a late fee. I asked for the fee to be removed and to look into the delay of my re-fi. He said that in order for him to remove the existing late, I needed to bring my loan current. To which I did and by closing out my IRA account. The closing check was just over XXXX. I also informed him that when I asked my loan officer why the delay, he said that re-fi take back seat to new loans and that they are overwhelmed right now due to changes in the regulations. The manager agreed with that statement. 


On XXXX/XXXX/15 I received the follow email : XXXX, I got a call from the processor, XXXX that she was ready to submit your file to underwriting, but that we needed the XXXX payment to be current. When do you expect to make that XXXX payment so we can get your file underwritten please? 
Thank you - XXXX is the loan officer. I called him and said that I have my IRA closing check and it is just over XXXX and I would like to put it towards a down payment. After running some simple numbers we agreed that it would not make enough change in the payment value and he also said that he would have to redo the closing papers. So I agreed that I will bring my existing loan current and the remaining will go to pay off some debt. 

From the email I just referenced, I brought my loan current and was under the impression that the loan had been pulled and sent to underwriting. I have not received ANY calls from BB & T since then, saying the my loan was past due, none. 

Just the other day I received another email from my loan officer saying that I need to provide information pertaining to make IRA deposit of XXXX proving where it come from. It is under XXXX and a legal deposit! He also informed me that I need to bring my loan current again, by 2months. This is of it self, will change the closing loan value. Today XXXX/XXXX/15 I called BB & T XXXX to file a complaint and spoke to a manager. He said that a senior manager would be in touch with me within 2-3 days. He did not give me a direct line or any way to follow up, upon my request, should that not happen. That is when I decided to file a complaint with CFPB. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Mortgage with Wells Fargo Bank in XXXX for my home. Had to file ch XXXX bankruptcy on XXXX XXXX following a nasty divorce in XXXX. I completed the intent to re-affirm on my mortgage with my attorney and sent to the judge as well as to WF. Judge signed off on everything XXXX XXXX ; told everything was fine. XXXX XXXX loan officer from WF contacted me to refinance my mortgage ; completed paperwork and was stopped at underwriters dept stating that re-affirmation paperwork had not been completed/accepted and loan was discharged. After multiple conversations with the bankruptcy dept at WF and my attorney - no resolution was made. Filed a claim w/Attorney General 's office in XXXX against WF. Filed motion to re-open bankruptcy case requesting WF to lift the stay and report payments. Motion to re-open bankruptcy case was granted and on XXXX XXXX, XXXX appeared in front of the judge. Judge granted motion asking WF to lift stay and report all payments ( WF has not reported payments since XXXX XXXX XXXX as I have not missed any payments ( I have records of each pymt ). I can not refinance my mortgage ( to get it out of WF hands ) as my credit score is too low and with a mortgage accounting for more than 78 % of credit score ... I need WF to report my payments. WF has managed my escrow account this entire time - paying my homeowners/property taxes. I am being denied on loan request for my kids ' college parent plus loans, denied for auto loans ( unless I want to pay a ridiculous interest rate XXXX. My attorney believes that I have a lawsuit against WF, however I do not have the funds for this. I am just looking for some help to get this resolved - I have been fighting with this stupid bank ( HORRIBLE CUSTOMER SERVICE ) since XXXX. Any help with this matter would be greatly appreciated. I will attach all documentation ... please advise if you need additional documentation to proceed. Thanks Much! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I made a purchase at Bloomingdale 's and returned the item on XXXX XXXX. I had received a cc bill for a payment due by XXXX XXXX a couple of days prior to XXXX XXXX. Because the item returned was the total amount on bill, I was told in-store that no payment would be due on the XXXX. On that same day I made another purchase, but being that I had already received the month 's credit card bill, believed that the later purchase would carry over onto the following month 's bill ( i.e. due XXXX XXXX ). When I received this month 's bill there was a late fee charge of {$27.00}. When I called customer service, I was told that the reason I accrued the late fee was because returns do n't count as balance pay offs. I tried to explain to the representative that for any other credit card I have, as long as the refund processes well before the due date of the bill, that I can deduct the amount of the returned item from my total payment. I further tried to explain that based on the policy the store was telling me, that Bloomingdale 's in essence can get double monies as they can re-sell the returned item + hold onto my money for merchandise I no longer have ( i.e. have double the money ). It was reiterated that returns do n't constitute payment on credit card balances. I got them to remove the late fee, but was told that I will have the same problem again this month when I explained that on my new bill I owed {$48.00} due XXXX XXXX. I returned XXXX item for {$30.00} and then paid the remainder of my bill in store for {$17.00}. I was assured that yes indeed, I would again be charged a late fee as I did n't pay off my credit card balance. This system sound egregious to me. I was told I could contact Bloomingdale 's Department stores National Bank for an executive complaint, but have opted to contact your agency XXXX, as I beleive what they are doing is a far bigger problem. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Barclaycard contacted me in XX/XX/XXXX and asked if the charges on my account were authorized by me and I said no they were n't. They issued me a new cards and said that they would credit my account the {$210.00} that was unauthorized. I have contacted them on five separate occasions and they still have not credited back my credit card nor have they sent me any correspondence 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I sent an id theft affidavit to Experian to block XXXX items that were opened in my name by someone else. They sent back a notice that they would not block the item without a police report. This is a violation of my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. When this act was amended in 2004, the credit bureau representatives who came to train on the differences clearly indicated that a police report was NOT mandatory. Indeed, they provide copies of an ID Theft Affidavit ( attached ) that could be used to identify the item. 
Section 605B clearly indicates that a copy of an identity theft report would be required but not that it must be a police report:605B. Block of information resulting from identity theft [ 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ] ( a ) Block. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a consumer reporting agency shall block the reporting of any information in the file of a consumer that the consumer identifies as information that resulted from an alleged identity theft, not later than 4 business days after the date of receipt by such agency of- ( 1 ) appropriate proof of the identity of the consumer ; ( 2 ) a copy of an identity theft report ; ( 3 ) the identification of such information by the consumer ; and ( 4 ) a statement by the consumer that the information is not information relating to any transaction by the consumer. 
But like the credit bureaus have done with sending letters extending a mandatory 30 day time frame for investigating disputes ... changing the 7 year time frame for reporting Chapter XXXX bankruptcies after 40 years ... .and not allowing consumers to have their disputes removed ( who else but consumers would know they are no longer disputing ), the bureaus have simply changed the rules without changing the laws. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Security National has wrongfully repossessed my car on XXXX separate occasions. The first time my car was repossessed, Security National made an error on processing a payment deferment and repossessed my car while I was serving a 12 month XXXX. No notice was given after the repossession and my wife believed the car to be stolen. Upon further inspection after returning my vehicle there was significant damage to the front of my car consistent with the repo company improperly towing my vehicle. I immediately notified Security National of the issue and sent detailed photos of the damage. My complaint was however ignored and I was never compensated for the damages or the loss of use of my vehicle. A year passed since this incident and I was forced to file chapter XXXX bankruptcy for some uncontrollable circumstances. I filed a successful motion to redeem my vehicle from Security National at the fair market value. Security National failed to adhere to the court order and held the title to the vehicle in excess of 30 days after the funds had been received far exceeding the 3 day mandated surrender of the title annotated in the court order. During this time they continued to aggressively seek the recovery of my vehicle by having repossession agents come to my home. I contacted Security National about this issue and was told by a representative that they were still seeking to collect a debt from me and were unaware of any court documents sent to them even though the check sent to them had been cashed almost a month prior. It was n't until I was put on an extended hold and told that the documents had been magically found that I was reassured the issue would be resolved and the account would be closed, the title sent out and the repossession efforts would cease. Almost two weeks had passed following this conversation and another repo agent successfully repossessed my vehicle on a Sunday at my residence. I was unable to seek any kind of help because of this and was n't able to contact Security National till the following day. The repo company blamed Security National for not rescinding the repo order and Security National blamed the repo company for not receiving notice to cancel the order. Irrigardless of their communication issues I was still a victim of my car being unlawfully repossessed when Security National had no legal ownership of my vehicle. Again, I was never compensated for the inconvience or loss of use of my vehicle for this second wrongful repossession. The disorganization of this auto lender is appalling and I feel what has happened to me is unacceptable. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I sent an id theft affidavit to Trans Union to block XXXX items that were opened in my name by someone else. They sent back a notice that they would not block the item without a police report. This is a violation of my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. When this act was amended in 2004, the credit bureau representatives who came to train on the differences clearly indicated that a police report was NOT mandatory. Indeed, they provide copies of an ID Theft Affidavit ( attached ) that could be used to identify the item. 
Section XXXX clearly indicates that a copy of an identity theft report would be required but not that it must be a police report:XXXX. Block of information resulting from identity theft [ 15 U.S.C. 1681c-2 ] ( a ) Block. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a consumer reporting agency shall block the reporting of any information in the file of a consumer that the consumer identifies as information that resulted from an alleged identity theft, not later than 4 business days after the date of receipt by such agency of- ( 1 ) appropriate proof of the identity of the consumer ; ( 2 ) a copy of an identity theft report ; ( 3 ) the identification of such information by the consumer ; and ( 4 ) a statement by the consumer that the information is not information relating to any transaction by the consumer. 
But like the credit bureaus have done with sending letters extending a mandatory 30 day time frame for investigating disputes ... changing the 7 year time frame for reporting Chapter XXXX bankruptcies after 40 years ... .and not allowing consumers to have their disputes removed ( who else but consumers would know they are no longer disputing ), the bureaus have simply changed the rules without changing the laws. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am divorced from XXXX XXXX XXXX as recorded on XXXX XXXX, 2013 in the XXXX County Circuit Court, KY. As part of my divorce decree, my ex-wife was deemed entirely responsible for a loan we jointly entered into when married. This loan is with XXXX County Bank and was a loan used to improve a house of which she has current ownership. Even though the payments are less than {$200.00} a month, she has not made them in a timely fashion. I realize that my name is still on the bank records for this loan, but my decree shows that this responsibility is hers and hers alone. The negative impact her continuing poor financial management is having on my credit score is unreasonable. I respectfully request that this entry is removed from my credit score. 
As a second item, I have worked quite hard to satisfy all outstanding debts to the creditors at XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and GLA. These debts are still showing as unsatisfied ; this is simply not true. Please correct these errors. 
Finally, I feel wrongly penalized for the credit inquiries I have had to request in pursuit of rehabbing my credit after divorce from my financially irresponsible ex-wife. How is a man who has served his country supposed to recover from the financial devastation wreaked by the person at home who was trusted to manage those finances if not by getting records and assessing damage? Please, is there any way to remove the negative rating these inquiries give me? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My sister transferred funds from my mother 's HELOC accountto her personal account per Bank of America. These transfers occurred approximately XXXX years after our mother died. 

Original HELOC had XXXX co-signers. XXXX are deceased and I am the third. B of A suspects my sister represented herself to be our mother and made transfers of approximately {$300000.00} between XXXX and XXXX. 

My sister continued to make all interest payments. Further she sold house, collateralizing the HELOC XX/XX/XXXX and made no principal payment from sale proceeds, yet she provided the buyer a Warranty Deed. Bank of America charged off the HELOC in amount of {$340000.00} XX/XX/XXXX and it appears on my XXXX credit report. I had no knowledge of this until XX/XX/XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response