AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: Bank of America - Acct XXXXXXXXPrevious Complaint # s XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXXXXXXOriginal HAMP loan paperwork was sent to me that included the name of the original co-signer on the loan. The original co-signer holds no interest in the property, it has been quick claim deeded to me 100 % and the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX office shows only my name on the deed. The loan re-modification did not take into consideration the co-signer as to income and only my information was utilized. Final contract papers were sent to me in my name solely. However, recent mailings with regard to current operational aspects of the loan continue to contain the previous co-signer 's name. In a verbal conversation with XXXX XXXX on XXXX XXXX, 2015 at XXXX, I was told that : 1. Despite my sole signature on the current loan documents where I accept 100 % responsibility, the original co-signer would still be on the loan ; 2. XXXX XXXX in effect admitted to me that Bank of America had no intention of ever removing the second borrower from the loan, I told him what prior verbal agreements had been made and he assured me that I was incorrect and past information had been misrepresented to me as he had the correct answer and that despite what I signed he would only be removed if I refinanced the loan. This, therefore tells me that the paperwork I have been requested to sign is a willful misrepresentation of fact designed to get my signature and finalize a fraudulent modification. In prior conversations with past customer relationship manager XXXX XXXX a representation was made to me that upon completion of the final loan documents ( that hold my signature alone ) the original co-signer would no longer be on the loan. A verbal agreement was made on more than XXXX occasion and now I am being told something completely different. Bank of America has willfully misrepresented their position to me in an effort to obtain my signature under the guise of the loan modification, tendering only my name and not that of the original co-signer as agreed to by XXXX XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Why did I make payments to State Farm bank for the prepaid insurance they got from XXXX XXXX? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Experian is reporting information regarding XXXX BANK XXXX .... on my credit report, and their system refuses to let me re-dispute. No other CRA is reporting it, only Experian. Creditor 's statement : Account transferred to another lender, and Experian refuses to investigate the name of that lender. Moreover, I have no knowledge of the account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I applied for a loan modification with Suntrust Mortgage. I qualified for an modification option to convert from an ARM to a fixed rate mortgage. I was 6 years into the mortgage. I am a divorced mother of XXXX and ex-husband was on original loan. In divorce he had to quit claim as I did on his property. 

Suntrust required him to sign modification application but then when presented with quit claim, allowed me to proceed without his signature. I have completed the 4 month trial period and loan mod docs have been sent to me. 

Problem : They are now requiring ex-husband signature now. He is an unfriendly/uncooperative party and is trying to leverage his signature with his lawyers for a percentage ownership in the property and other stipulations. 

Suntrust will not let me sign alone even though I made the application alone and the calculations were based on my income alone. I need them to be compelled to allow me to sign alone. 

If I ca n't execute this modification I will have to default as I owe 6k on demand to go back to the original structure. The ex does n't care about defaulting he has family money and many lawyers. Please help me compel Suntrust to allow my sole signature on this modification. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

THIS IS NOT MY DEBT! 

I WANT THIS ACCOUNT REMOVED FROM MY CREDIT REPORT AND THIS COMPANY TO STOP CONTACTING ME IMMEDIATELY! 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: EXPERIAN / XXXX / XXXX XXXX ALL THE MAJOR CONSUMER CREDIT REPORTING AGENCIES ARE REPORTING FRAUD ACCOUNTS AND WILL NOT BLOCK OR REMOVE ITEMS AS OUTLINED BY LAW. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS AND POLICE REPORT ALONG WITH LETTERS FROM THE COMPANIES REPORTING NEGATIVE AND FRAUD ACCOUNTS. ALL ACCOUNTS REPORTED ON EXPERIAN / XXXX / XXXX XXXX SHOW FRAUD ACCOUNTS OPENED BY XXXX XXXX USING MY NAME / SS # / DL # AND XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX BANKS ACCOUNTS THAT I 'VE BEEN EXONERATED OF ANY DEBT OR LIABILITY. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: In XXXX XXXX I experienced a foreclosure in the state of Arizona. I had a XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. The XXXX lien was with XXXX XXXX XXXX and the XXXX lien with XXXX Bank. XXXX XXXX XXXX has reflected the foreclosure since XXXX. XXXX Bank was reporting the {$25000.00} XXXX lien as closed since XXXX XXXX ; however, it came to my attention that my DTI was extremely high. This was odd since I do n't carry balances on credit cards. I have been building my credit back up over the course of the past XXXX years and it was in the XXXX zone if not higher. I reviewed my credit report and XXXX Bank was reporting that I owed approximately {$24000.00} a month in monthly debt obligations. Absolutely not. I disputed this and they corrected it. But when they corrected it they claimed the charge off to be XXXX XXXX. I have already experienced the devastation of my credit in XXXX and XXXX. I am now being penalized again for the same event by XXXX Bank, but today, XXXX XXXX. I have called XXXX Bank and I get no where. Experian says their hands are tied. This is violation of FCRA and I am being penalized for the same thing that I have been rebuilding from. I just received a notification that my credit score, from being XXXX in XXXX is now a XXXX. I have 8 % DTI. I 'm seeking help. I have also inquired with a lawyer if I ca n't get this resolved. Please help me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

THIS IS NOT MY DEBT! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

THIS IS NOT MY DEBT! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: Received Stop Release due to garnishment and company Union Adjustment XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, Ca XXXX XXXX. Has submitted a new garnishement same case # XXXX. XXXX County, Superior Court ... XXXX Ca. The stop release was given back in XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX here they are again taking my money. Company I purchased a car from over 15 years ago refused to fix a broken computer chip. Had not been 3 months. So I did vouluntary reposession and I ended up out of money put down and car i used as part of down payment. And had no transportation. Now all these years later these people who I do not owe a dime are garnishing my check for the XXXX time ... Please make this stop. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

THIS IS NOT MY DEBT! 

I WANT THIS ACCOUNT REMOVED FROM MY CREDIT REPORT AND THIS COMPANY TO STOP CONTACTING ME IMMEDIATELY! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I set up a date with the collector from ez money payday loans to pay a settlement amount he couldnt do it the same day because they were still trying to collect it from my account the collector called me a day early, then called me the next day. I tried to pay it and he decided to raise the amount by {$50.00} then refused to take anything less which I could n't pay. Now they are calling me at least XXXX a day on the same number which I have told them several times is inconvient to me. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: THIS IS NOT MY DEBT! This company continues to report on my credit report after I sent them a letter telling them that this account was not mine and I have no idea what it is or who it belongs to! 

I asked for proof of a signed contract, I asked for a license to collect in my state, I asked for copies of all information referenced for this debt and still to date, I have not received anything but harassment from this company! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX people are XXXX and XXXX you like a dog. I started trying to communicate with XXXX. My credit limit was XXXX. Why is it XXXX?? No one wants to tell me. I am willing to pay my credit limit as an in full payment and am told no. I am also threatened with legal action and XXXX has sent v this to an attorney. The attorney says that in order to settle for just my credit limit that XXXX wants my income, my bank information, my utility information, my drivers license number etc ... information they are not going to get nor are they entitled to get this info. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had not intent of applying for this kind of loan but was solicited to do so with deceptive practicesI was told the loan would be easy to get and I would have no trouble qualifyingSoon after I was forced to go through a process that called into question my credit worthiness, my property records, and so on. The process turned from " no trouble qualifying '' to a miasma of official documents and the likeI was sent a letter stating that the loan was approvedI was told the loan would not be approved on XXXX XXXX I received another letter asking for documentation so the loan would get approvedSn email from me : In the end I do not understand why the paperwork relative to the divorce and the deed for my home were adequate for a line of equity from Homestreet Bank and a {$400000.00} refinance from XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

You should be very careful about enticing customers to apply for loans without having all of the facts of the matter. This process caused harm psychologically and emotionally and I made financial decisions based on your bank 's words of certain loan approval. 

Deceptive practices were used to get to my apply for a loan that I did not seek. My paperwork was kept without my approval. 

The paperwork was returned. However, I also received a XXXX day air UPS package from a bank XXXX blocks from my home that was supposed to be sent to me on XXXX and should also include my tax documents. In perhaps the most pitiful part of all of this my tax documents are not included in the package. Instead I received tax documents for XXXX XXXX XXXX whom I do not know. 

US BANK cajoled me into applying for a loan I did not seek. I was told the loan was approved but I needed to close XXXX credit accounts. I did this is good faith based on the assurance of my bankerI was told by the banker that the loan was a part of building my relationship with him and US Bank. He did not tell me that he was leaving US Bank even as he had announced this before I applied for the loanMy grievance has to do with the strong arm sales tactics of US Bank and the deceptive parts of the loan process. The banker blamed the incompetence of the underwriters for the delay in processing the loan and left the bank before the loan was denied. 

In this case the bank obviously did not work in the best interests of a customer. In fact the bank did quite the opposite. It compromised by credit availability and also put me through a grueling and intrusive process despite promises to do just the opposite. 

This kind of banking practice is unfortunate and harmful and banks should not be able to make promises that that can not keep and fool consumers 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been attempting to get a Mortgage Modification with Bank of America for over four years. Each time until recently I have been placed in a circle where without explanation by modification has to be restarted without a final answer of the previous attempt. I have a numerous number of agents assist me with this process until recently when I was afforded a Dept of Justice Modification that was part of a settlement with BOA and the XXXX due to the mortgage crisis. BOA has not offered any proof od security in the process in writing and I had to pay a large monthly installments out of faith to ensure the new loan of my home. Now that they have received their money not only has the demeanor of BOA personnel changed towards me but also the timeline to complete the process has been drastically expedited. My rep explained to me the loan would be in underwriting for at least 30 days, at that time I would receive paperwork I needed to sign then given another 30 days to return the information. At this time I have only heard via phone call my modification was approved and I need to send all required paperwork by by XXXX XXXX, 2015. This is gives me less than two weeks to turn around vital paperwork to save my home. It took four years and a 16 billion dollar fine for BOA to get my mortgage right but I have less than two weeks. When I attempted to escalate my concerns to an authority that could better assist I was denied any chance to speak to someone above my case managers supervisor. His supervisor was rude and uncooperative to reason by telling me how they expect anyone above her would respond to my request. This experience with BOA has left me feeling they rather foreclose on my home and sale it at a higher price than what my modification was ordered by the DOJ to be in order to recoup part of the money lost from the previous fine. I served over 20 years and XXXX I 'm confused why BOA would include XXXX in their title. My wife and I are both XXXX veterans and she is a XXXX. Our income has changed dramatically over the last three years plus our flexibility of employment is limited due to high medical demands. We need this modification to go through and our ability to return needed paperwork is important to finalize the details. I pray that BOA would take action not only to allow me time needed to return my paperwork, but adjust their policy to do so when the opportunity warrants. I feel BOA owes it to their customers/ clients to place them in a Mortgage that reflects the true value of their home and should make ample time to ensure all homeowners are given time necessary to salvage their lives do the financial crisis caused by BOA and other banks affiliated with this issue. With extra care to those who have served and lost part of themselves after serving in XXXX protecting our way of life. Some agents say thanks but actions speak louder than words. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I pulled a credit report and noticed a collection account. It is an amount of 120 dollars. I reached out via certified mail in an attempt to verify debt and even settle since it was a small amount. First Credit Services will not answer me with any information about debt and unfortunately I can barely understand their customer service when speaking over the phone with them. 

Back in XX/XX/XXXX spoke numerous times to trainer XXXX. Informed me only XXXX could help me. So after numerous attempts in XX/XX/XXXX turned my key fob in to XXXX as I was unable to reach XXXX.I have been charged up until XX/XX/XXXX. Even XXXX called me to get my new card security info, XXXX numbers on back of card, which I never gave out but they worked around that as I never gave consent to debit my new credit card. 
Emailed XX/XX/XXXX via online " email my club '' link asking for membership and contract info identifying myself. That email wentunanswered. 

XX/XX/XXXX called XXXX spoke with XXXX who tried to call the XXXX branch but like usual no one was in. XXXX said she would call me back when she heard back but would not give me her extension or direct line to reach her. She never called me back. Several calls later all with no answers I had to cancel credit/debit cards and get new account. Since then it appear as if penalty fees have been assessed. 
The cancellation letter and the amount to collect do not even match. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Our initial mortgage was with Bank of America who offered to refinance, but the payment was as much as original mortgage due to pending mortgage deficiency, they then sold our mortgage to one of their subsidiary 's " XXXX XXXX XXXX ''. 

We had sought the assistance of XXXX to assist us with the refinancing. XXXX XXXX XXXX refused to refinance our mortgage telling XXXX they had received our paper work too late. However, this was in correct as all requested documents were sent and submitted within the time frame required. XXXX XXXX simply refused to work with XXXX on our behalf. 

In addition, XXXX XXXX XXXX it would appear intentionally caused our mortgage to become default, which resulted in them selling it to XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

XXXX XXXX at the time of selling our mortgage to XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX, was negligent in their fiduciary duties in that they did not disclose to XXXX that we had filed a complaint with your agency, Consumer Finance and that they ( XXXX ) had refused to work with XXXX. Their action resulted in the property being sold to XXXX without any consideration for our need and ability to re-finance in an attempt to save our home. XXXX obtain a court order resulting in us having to vacate the property no later than XX/XX/XXXX. 

The action of XXXX XXXX has caused not only the loss of our home, but extreme emotional distress and absorbent monetary loss and financial hardship. 

We appeal to you for any all assistance and remedy with respect to the issues raised in this complaint. 
We thank you in advance for your kind consideration and concern in this matter. 

With kind regards, we remain. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: You all have failed to use reasonable care in the course of business and failed to use even minimal procedures to ensure that I was not harmed. You all have also failed to adhere to federal regulations and violated several laws of the FCRA. 

*XXXX # XXXX # XXXX {$510.00} Has agreed to delete all accounts you still choose to report. FCRA guidelines a collection can not be past due. You all have not provided me with the verification method you used on this account that you say you previously verified. This Collection Agency has not verified this account. A collection account can not go into collections according to FCRA guidelines ; the Collection company can not report that because they are not the original creditor. Reporting inaccurate negative information ; violation of FCRA. 
XXXX XXXX # XXXX {$0.00} : Please provide verification the dates XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX regarding late payments listed and provide me with the verification method used. During these periods the military member was XXXX and notified school of her XXXX, but XXXX XXXX released her deferrment due to No Longer Enrolled in School. The memeber was till enrolled, but had to drop classes due to military XXXX. Loan was forgiven because memeber is now a XXXX veteran. Reporting inaccurate negative information ; violation of FCRA. Violation of SCRA. Which is unverifiable and by law should be removed. XXXX XXXX has no information on the account. 
XXXX XXXX # XXXX .... {$8000.00} : Reinserted after previous deletion. According to FCRA guidelines a charge off or collection account can not be past due. The account can not be an installment or note account it is a charge off account according to FCRA guidelines. Please verify the said dates of Charge off Lates and or collection. Date of Satus and remarks in status does not match. The information is contradicting. Reporting inaccurate negative information ; violation of FCRA. Violation of SCRA. Which is unverifiable and by law should be removed. 
XXXX {$65.00} : According to FCRA guidelines a collection account can not be past due. The account can not be an installment or note account it is a collection according to FCRA guidelines. Please verify the said dates of collection. Dateof Satus and remarks in status does not match. The information is contradicting. Reporting inaccurate negative information ; violation of FCRA. Violation of SCRA. Which is unverifiable and by law should be removed. 
Inquiries : You all have stated to contact the reporter about inquiries and I have and they remain unverified. It is also your job to not report unverifiable information. If you can not verify that I authorized these companies access to my credit file then you are in direct violation of the FCRA, because the FCRA states that Reporting Agencies must correct or delete any incomplete unverifiabe information. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response