AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I purchased a vehicle that was financed through XXXX on XXXX XXXX 2014. Every payment was made on time and in ful however the credit union has reported me XXXX days late for XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX which is incorrect. The car was totaled in XXXX, insurance paid off {$14000.00} and the remaining balance of {$6900.00} was covered by my GAP insurance. XXXX has refused to update my account and has listed me as XXXX days past due for XXXX, XXXX days past due for XXXX, XXXX days past due for XXXX, XXXX days past due for XXXX on a balance of {$6900.00} even though that amount has been paid since XXXX. This account was NEVER late and is paid off. I have disputed this with all XXXX bureaus, XXXX fixed the issue after reviewing my proof however Experian and XXXX believe XXXX and say they trump any proof I provide. XXXX, the collection manager from XXXX contacted me after I filed my disputes after I told her to contact my attorney to discuss the matter she told me to go XXXX and hung up on me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am in the process of purchasing a home and FHA XXXX my loan type ) requires all trade lines that reflect I dispute to be removed. I called each bureau, XXXX Experian, XXXX to remove all disputes on my credit report. After several attempts Experian will not remove this dispute. I called XXXX to tell them I want a letter stating I am telling them I know longer dispute and they would not give me this letter unless I paid the account in full so that is what I did XXXX XXXX. When I received the letter all it says is they received a payment from me for {$1500.00}. Nothing that says the account is paid in full and nothing that says the trade line is no longer in dispute. My lender then sent me a letter that the credit company use says they can submit to all bureaus to remove the dispute for me. I signed and they tried with no results. At this point I can not get a loan and my husband and I are living in a hotel waiting to clear this matter. I demand that Experian update my report and I demand XXXX funding to remove that I am disputing this account. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I purchased a vehicle that was financed through XXXX on XXXX XXXX 2014. Every payment was made on time and in ful however the credit union has reported me XXXX days late for XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX which is incorrect. The car was totaled in XXXX, insurance paid off {$14000.00} and the remaining balance of {$6900.00} was covered by my XXXX insurance. XXXX has refused to update my account and has listed me as XXXX days past due for XXXX, XXXX days past due for XXXX, XXXX days past due for XXXX, XXXX days past due for XXXX on a balance of {$6900.00} even though that amount has been paid since XXXX. This account was NEVER late and is paid off. I have disputed this with all XXXX bureaus, XXXX fixed the issue after reviewing my proof however XXXX Transunion believe XXXX and say they trump any proof I provide. XXXX, the collection manager from XXXX contacted me after I filed my disputes after I told her to contact my attorney to discuss the matter she told me XXXX and hung up on me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX, 2015 @ XXXX I was contacted by someone caed my job stating that she needed to what time I would be home to serve me some papers I needed to sign for I informed her that I work daily and do not have set hours that i come home in the evening. I then asked what kind of papers she responded just to notify me of debit she gave me contact info of the company with a reference number. I called the company @ XXXX Reference # XXXX & the said the were working for an investor & they wanted full payment I explained i can make a payment of {$20.00} a month she put me on hold said investor would on take {$170.00} a month i explained i could not afford that amount & she got really rude and stated how close can you come i responded {$20.00} she said i need to be more realist with payment. I hung up on her when she got loud. I recieved several number withheld numbers & then a message was left stating she would be out to my home on XXXX XXXX, 2015 & she needs to see my ID to leave papers & she has a XXXX address she will also go to if i am not home and left the number where the papers where sent from. I then called the company who does not give the name of the company & I spoke with XXXX XXXX ext. XXXX I explained to him that I recieved a voicemail from some woman stating she was going to bring papers to my home & XXXX address if I am not home I told him they could not come to my job he stated that she would not and they would just be sent in the mail if she could not reach me. As i was hanging up the phone he stated good luck in court & hung up. I called the number back and asked for his name, company name, & address so I could file a complaint for the comment he made about have a good luck in court when I was told the day before that the papers were just to notify me of the debt & it had not reached that stage yet & I also wanted to report him for his attitude. I also told XXXX XXXX that I was going to report the threat to take legal action to the FTC. He then became reallly rude and gave me the address of Lion Stone Holdings Group LLC XXXX New York XXXX and the Director is XXXX XXXX ( ext. XXXX ) & he stated again good luck in court case we do plan to take action & do you want the attorneys name I hung up on him because he was upseting me with his rude attitude. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I had a short sale approved by the lender, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. During the sale process the loan was sold to XXXX. The sale was successfully closed on XX/XX/XXXX, as reported correctly by XXXX. I have just ( XX/XX/XXXX ) discovered that my credit report shows a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage FORECLOSURE with a XXXX balance outstanding. The most recent reporting by WFHM was XX/XX/XXXX. I called XXXX to begin the process of clearing the error and was told to contact the credit bureau instead. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: When my credit was pulled there was an account from Enhanced recovery for XXXX.I requested validation of debt including contract and account history.The date they are reporting is not accurate and what they submitted proves the way it is reporting on credit is not correct. I have disputed with the bureaus and yet this company still reports inaccurately. They are indicating that the account opened XX/XX/XXXX yet the final bill was received XX/XX/XXXX and what the collection company forwarded was nothing more than a bill showing total due for billing period of XX/XX/XXXX-XX/XX/XXXX and and bill Date XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and it reporting a previous balance of {$1200.00}. No break down of fees or anything. I did save the final bill received from XX/XX/XXXX. I want this deleted and any reference to this on my credit report. It is also past the statue of limitations for collections in NV. I have attached all documents I have referenced above. I am also sending a copy of the letter that was sent asking for validation. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Our home is mortgaged through XXXX XXXX, the servicing agency being Select Portfolio Services XXXX " SPS '' ]. XX/XX/XXXX, the anniversary date, we notified SPS that under the terms of the agreement, we would pay the insurance carrier for hazard insurance on our property directly, and would no longer be paying through SPS. We provided a written notice and the policy declaration to the company. See, Exhibit A, appended. SPS continued to bill us monthly for the escrow payment. XX/XX/XXXX, we resubmitted the same information, again requesting that SPS no longer bill us for escrow for hazard insurance. Although SPS responded in writing [ See, Exhibit B, appended ] and we have had numerous communications with SPS, and promises that the issue would be resolved, SPS has not stopped billing. See, Exhibit C, appended. Because of concern about possible reports by SPS to credit reporting agencies that we are delinquent in mortgage payments, we have continued to pay SPS. SPS, therefore, has taken our money purportedly to pay for insurance, but has never paid the insurance carrier -- we have. At this point, SPS has overbilled us {$1000.00} -- being doublebilling for insurance escrow money SPS never paid the carrier. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Sherriff Sale was on XXXX/XXXX/2015. Financial package requesting loan modification was submitted on XXXX 2015, Sherriff Sale was postponed to XXXX/XXXX/2015. Document requested on XXXX 2015 were submitted, contact with the special contact person on XXXX confirmed they had everything needed and case was on review. No mail or phone call since then, now its XXXX/XXXX/2015, after several ph calls, to no avail, requested to speak to customer service. This Department explains that the special contact person is the only one that can discuss this case. That the last Notes on the case were when docs were received on XXXX and case was sent to review. Sherriff sale still schedule for XXXX/XXXX/2015. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: The Fair Credit Reporting Act was established as Section Nine XXXX 9 ) of the 1970 Currency Act, otherwise known as Public Law 91-508, and subsequently amended many times. It was established to protect consumers as well as the commercial banking industry. It also establishes a playing field for full disclosure on the validation or verification of credit trade lines or items of public record. 
An item of public record being a judgment granted to a creditor against an individual, having the right of being on a credit bureau, that are part of credit reporting agencies ( CRA 'S ). These items have a right to stay on one 's credit report for XXXX XXXX 10 XXXX years from the date the judgment was granted. However, several changes have been accomplished recently based upon rules on re-aged debts. 
Bankruptcies have a right to be maintained on credit bureaus for ten XXXX 10 XXXX years, be it a Chapter XXXX or Chapter XXXX. 
I personally, as part of my right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act have a right to know where an item of public record originated from, such as a public record vendor. It must be presented to me who the public record vendor was, their contact information, and a person XXXX s ) responsible for the maintaining of any true copy original of an item posted against me on any credit bureau ; i.e., XXXX Trans Union respectively. 
Accordingly, I have submitted a request for full authenticity of a bankruptcy posted against my credit bureau, and that no disclosure has been submitted to me as to where this information originated from. 
I respectfully request that since the credit reporting agency in question has failed to live up to the high standards of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, that this bankruptcy listed be deleted permanently. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citibank refuses to provide equal access to services for XXXX customers who do not use TTY services. I was unable to register for an online account for my Citibank Thank You card, in order to pay it directly, and requested assistance via their advertised XXXX account. I had the card in my possession, as well as all other information necessary to open an account. Despite using DM XXXX Direct Messaging ) which is secure, the representative refused to assist, and told me that the only available way they would assist me is TTY, voice telephone, or physically going to the bank. I asked for a supervisor many times and was denied, and eventually ignored. I wasted over an hour of my time trying to get assistance from Citibank. The amount listed below for lost money is my hourly billable rate. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was given a payday loan of {$2600.00} from a Company called XXXX XXXX back in XXXX of XXXX. This loan was illegal in my state of NJ. I found that out after taking the loan, and after I had paid back over {$1800.00}. Payments were {$290.00} per month, and hardly any of it went to principal ( probably less than {$20.00} a month ). 
Once this loan was issue, it was immediately taken over by some company in California called Cash Call so that it would look like a legitimate installment loan. 
I was advised not to pay anymore money to this company in XXXX of XXXX. They were taking money out of my bank account, but I changed the account number once I was told not this loan was illegal. 
I have complained about this company previously. They keep sending me offers to make payment on a loan that has now grown to over {$10000.00} ( {$10000.00} ) from an original loan of {$2600.00} of which payment of {$1800.00} had been made. 
They are asking me to settle this loan for XXXX lump sum of {$1200.00} by XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, or make XXXX payments of {$170.00} starting by XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. 
I am not paying them another cent for an illegal loan that they did not initially make! 
Why are these people allowed to stay in business???? they are crooked and charge up to 300 % in interest. 
I want them to cease and desist their collection efforts and wipe this loan off their books and my credit report. Pls help. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My name is XXXX XXXX - A Housing Counselor submitting the complaint on behalf of my client XXXX XXXX XXXX. 
XXXX XXXX received a loan modification at a XXXX event XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. The modification lowered her interest rate and lowered her payment, however even though XXXX XXXX was NOT behind on the mortgage, {$14000.00} was added to her principal balance. This was discovered after she received the final paperwork. 
XXXX XXXX has been trying to find out why her principal balance increased by contacting Citbank and XXXX her new servicer. Citibank refers her to XXXX. XXXX refers her to Citibank. 
I was able to obtain a payment history from Citibank for years XX/XX/XXXX which confirms her payments were never late. 
Assistance is needed to find out why {$14000.00} was added to her principal balance when her loan was " modified '' XX/XX/XXXX when she was not behind on her payments. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: NET SPEND HAD XXXX OPEN ACCOUNTS OF ME. DID NOT NOTIFIED ME AND IT AFFECTED MY CREDIT. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: All documentation was sent to show payments for each EOB from my XXXX insurance provider. XXXX XXXX XXXX was trying to bill amount outside of contracted agreement with XXXX. 
XXXX representative informed me that this was illegal, per the contract agreement and my obligations were met. 
This information was provided to the Bureau Medical Economics who received all receipts of these transactions, but keeps sending harassing phone calls and notices. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: I took out a loan in 2008 for XXXX. I paid each month XXXX a month for a total of XXXX. I feel as though this loan is paid and their interest rates are outrageous. They are threatening to sue me. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Wells Fargo is the servicer of my loan. I have tried for a remodification 3 times. They always ask for me to resend and update information until I am exhausted, they promise that if I get everything in, there 's a good chance, but in the end, they always find an excuse not to give it to me. In the current application for remodification, I was told that I need a higher income. I told them that I had rented out my rooms in the past and had to get rid of my renters when I could n't afford the payments and tried to sell my home. So an executive that would n't give me his name said that if I send in proof of rental income, I will get my remodification. I sent it all in in XXXX 2015. Since then I have called and called. They are doing the same thing by requesting more and more documents that I have already sent them, and it has been 4 months without an answer. They are crooks! 

In addition, this XXXX they locked me out and barred me from my own home when I was XXXX payments overdue. We did n't even go into foreclosure, no judgements made, and they came to my home and had a contractor steal my orchids, disconnect my plumbing, dirty my carpets and more. I had just spoke to they attorney about moving back in after trying to sell it and having no luck because I owed too much to pay off the loan. After fighting with them over the phone, they returned my key, but never replaced or compensated for damages and stolen items. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was contacted by Colombia Recovery Group of XXXX, WA on Tuesday, XXXX XXXX at XXXX about a debt that I do owe but am unable to pay. I explained to the man who called that I had just lost my employment security funds for going to school, which meant my spouse and I are now out {$1500.00} a month. His response to this was to threaten wage garnishment, stating that it was " his next legal option ''. I searched the Washington State page for people with judgements against them, and neither my wife or myself have any judgements against us from anyone at all. It is my feeling that Colombia Recovery Group threatened me with legal action to illicit a payment by fear of being sued when they have no such suit against us. This account when to collections in XXXX and I 've only received XXXX letter/bill and XXXX phone calls, and their next step is making threats, which is grossly inappropriate. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: A money judgement pending in the Maine XXXX Court - XXXX, ME. was satisfied and dismissed. ( see attached Satisfaction of Judgment & Certified Court Docket ). I wish to remove this Public Record from my credit file as it negatively impacts my XXXX scoring as an erroneous record. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: There was a judgement issued through the courts for my son 's unpaid debt. The judgement was listed on my credit report. I called the Law firm that handled the judgement and verified the social security # and date of birth as being my sons. We both have the same name and address. I want his judgement removed from my credit report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Still reporting a judgement docket # : XXXX from 2008 on my credit report that is seven years old. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I spoke to Roundpoint Mortgage Service about the procedure for making a principal curtailment payment and recasting my mortgage in XXXX 2015. I was told that I should submit my regular monthly payment, then a curtailment payment, then send a request to the servicing help email address requesting a recast. I was informed the processing would occur within XXXX days and that I would be contacted for any further information and given documentation with new loan terms to accept. I submitted a curtailment payment of {$44000.00} on XXXX XXXX. Despite numerous phone conversations and emails, Roundpoint has not to my knowledge taken any steps to complete the recast of the mortgage, including informing me of any further information needed to complete the recast as explained to me prior to making the curtailment payment ( I opted to pursue a recast instead of refinancing the property based on the representations of the Roundpoint representatives ). 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Due to unforseen business problems associated with the downturn in XXXX, I lost a business where I had personal guarantees that caused me to seek personal Bankruptcy in late XXXX through XXXX. At the time I owned XXXX homes with mortgages with XXXX different financial institutions. XXXX I lost through the bankruptcy, but the other I kept which is the XXXX I am writing about. As part of the process, I went through the HAMP ( Home Affordable Modification Program ) which resulted in a loan modification. The trial period was completed in XXXX and a loan modification was completed. I have made all payments fully and on time since the trial period began and continuing with a loan modification through today - additionally earning " pay for performance '' incentives from the program each month eligible. 

A large part of rebuilding my credit is the new history of on-time payments. As such it is important that all of my credit history be available. My mortgage holder refuses to acknowledge and report my mortgage performance to the credit bureaus, citing my bankruptcy as the reason they do not have to report it. They indicated that I did not " reconfirm '' in the Bankruptcy proceedings that I intended to keep the mortgage, although I acknowledged in my initial filing that it was my intent, went through the HAMP program during the Bankruptcy, signed new mortgage modification paperwork, and have made all payments on time since completing the trial period to qualify. Additionally, since they will not report anything, my old mortgage shows on my credit reports as in Bankruptcy without showing resolution. 

The Bank was not asked, nor did they offer, to reduce the principle amount owed on the loan. While the interest rate on the loan is less than the previous amount on the original mortgage, they will be whole once the note is paid off. 

I previously contacted the Bank on more than XXXX occasion, seeking to have payment information reported to the credit agencies. The farthest I have gotten was being referred to the Bankruptcy department where I was told that since I have not " reconfirmed '' my intent during the Bankruptcy they were under no obligation to report my information. My only option was to reopen my Bankruptcy ( at my cost ) to reconfirm the mortgage. 

While others did suffer because of my Bankruptcy, as well as me personally, this particular institution did not. The whole intent of Bankruptcy is to help people get out of overwhelming debt and get back on the right track to financial independence. I am working very hard to resurrect my credit rating which for many years was in the high XXXX. But that is made difficult by the fact that the Bank will not report my credit information. I can not accept that this Bank has the right to hold back such information since I have a modified loan in good standing. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Still reporting a judgement docket # : XXXX from 2008 on my credit report that is XXXX years old. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response