AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: My name is XXXX XXXX my husband and I was a customer of XXXX Mortgage and then XXXX XXXX XXXX purchased the account. Since 2014 around about XXXX we asked for a home mortification and learned XXXX XXXX XXXX was told by The State Attorney Office in a Lawsuit to help people keep there homes in XXXX 2014. XXXX XXXX XXXX sold our account to Shellpoint Mortgage again we were told to submit paper to work to help us save our home. No one at XXXX Mortgage has worked with us, all income and bank statements proved we have gotten back on our feet to save our home. We have left messages and again no one will help us. My husband received a XXXX and we got behind while he was recoving XXXX. We need the help the was promised to us!! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I was called out of state for a family emergency and left on XXXX/XXXX/15. I left my landlord a 30 day notice in order to move to a new rental house and half of XXXX 2015 rent ( with instructions to deposit on XXXX/XXXX/15, IF I had not been able to return and submit in person. ) I left on my trip and unfortunately my landlord deposited the check left for him on XXXX. This resulted in over {$500.00} overdraft charges for less than {$200.00} spent on incidentals on my trip. My autodeposit of {$470.00} ( received XXXX ) was all applied toward fees. My friend deposited {$160.00} into my savings account ( upon my discovering the negative balance by surprise on XXXX ) for me to live on until months ' end. That too (! ) was immediately applied to late/overage charges even though I did not KNOWINGLY have Overdraft Protection from Savings established with my checking account. Had I known that was a likelihood, I would have requested my friend send $ via XXXX XXXX or a XXXX XXXX XXXX Option. I contacted my local branch and even with an end-of-the-monthgood faith deposit pending of {$1700.00} set up for auto-deposit, none of the ( excessive! ) fees were waived. I was left XXXX until months ' end and now my work paychecks will be " docked '' ANOTHER - {$400.00} to cover MORE overdraft charges that have mounted. The move to a new residence is having to be delayed and overdraft charges are now amounting to - {$800.00} plus. The US Bank in XXXX, KY was unwilling to forgive any of the " account bleeding '' even though the situation was explained and the date on the check deposited was starred and circled to try to prevent anything like this from happening. The stress and angst from the whole situation has been awful. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I used my debit card between XXXX and XXXX. At this time my checking account was in a positive balance, on XXXX I withdraw funds out of my checking account in the amount of XXXX, that caused me to have a overdraft fee of XXXX. On Tuesday, something told me to check my regions account, which I did and my negative balance was approx. XXXX. I thought this was an error so I called Regions customer service, I spoke to several supervisors on this day, the last person told me that her supervisor would issue a XXXX refund but that was it because, what happen was even though my account was in a positive over the weekend, when I over-drafted on Monday that caused my account to overdraft 9 times, which I am confused, how can you overdraft when your account is in a positive? Regardless of what order your transactions are being entered and I expressed this to the supervisor, whom advised me to go to the branch and speak with a branch manager, on XXXX, I spoke with a branch manager whom stated they can not refund overdraft fees anymore, that was taken away from them, she also gave me the total that I should of been charge, she states XXXX. My transaction receipt says I would be a charged an over-drafted fee and my negative balance is XXXX. This is not right, I do n't have money to give to Regions, I know that I had to pay a over-draft fee for my withdrawal on XXXX. But not for any purchases I made over the weekend prior, this is not right and should be looked into. How can you charge my account over-draft fees when I was in a positive balance and also, why are you turning the transaction order around, that 's how a lot of people miss fraud, the order should stay the way the person uses their debit card. I never knew the order was changed and have always wondered why I had to study my account to make sure there was no fraud transactions on it, this make it hard for a fraud transaction to be recognized immediately, unless in my case it 's XXXX in over-draft fees. And also, on XXXX the branch manager advised me to call customer service back pertaining to the fees, and I did so sitting in her office, the only thing I was told very rudely, was that I was getting nothing back on my account, and spoke to another supervisor that stated she will file a complaint for someone to call me back. This is horrible, I do n't have money to give to Regions, notice i over-drafted on XXXX. Why would a bank try to take a persons money? Upon writing this complaint, XXXX from Regions called me and explained that she will refund another XXXX and also they have charged me another XXXX for a transaction that I made over a week ago, my account balance is now in the negative of XXXX. I have been giving mixed communication about opt in and opt out, so I am opt out of Regions service, and still did not receive a full understanding on that. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Recently, I 've been having difficulty meeting my minimum payments on XXXX of my credit cards with Bank of America. I 've called and explained to them the situation, after being a loyal customer of theirs for many years, no one seemed to care about me and my situation, rather only cared about their money and their high interest rate. In my time of need, I asked them to lower the interest rate and/or work out a payment. I was declined XXXX options. I do n't think I am being treated fairly. They are only out to receive their high late payment and interest fees. They have no interest in what 's best for the customer. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have contacted Experian on several occasions by phone for assistance at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and through their website to dispute bankruptcy that appears on my credit report. Experian refuses to properly conduct investigation and claim they have already investigated item on several times. Experian representatives continuously lie stating they have sent someone over to representative over to federal court to verify information. Pursuant to Rule 1005 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, all documents filed with the court are to contain only the last XXXX digits of the individual 's social security number or tax identification number. 

Under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure a debtors full social security number is filed with the original petition, and filed under seal. Meaning the only information released to third parties who are not involved directly with your case is ( that includes credit reporting agencies such as Experian ) : ( 1 ) Your Full Name ; ( 2 ) The Last XXXX Digits of Your Social Security Number and ( 3 ) Your Address. Furthermore I was advised in order to obtain a debtor 's full social security number, a third party must file a motion with the court to unseal documents related to a case. This would be very unusual and does not happen on a regular basis. 

I have asked Experian representative to provide me with copy of court subpoena they received granting them full access to case. I have personal looking in The PACER Service and information listed on docket show address I never lived and last XXXX digits of a social security number. 

XXXX and XXXX have both removed this inaccurate information from my credit file and I would appreciate if Experian is forced to do the same. I am very sick and tired of playing cat and mouse with Experian. Their customer service representatives are very rude and company has culture to tending to wait out 30 days and not investigating disputes. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: I woke up Sunday morning ( XXXX XXXX ) to find that my vehicle was missing. I immediately called the police and was told that it had been repossessed. I 'm in total disbelief because I 've paid my car note faithfully around the XXXX of every month. I 've been doing so since XXXX. My driving forth to continue paying my note in the amount of {$350.00} is my maturity date of XXXX. My email address and mailing address has not changed and I was n't notified of any discrepancies of my method and frequency of payments. My rent and utilities are due at the beginning of the month, which is why I ca n't make my on the XXXX, the due date, which is also why I make the payment around the XXXX. I have been totally inconvenienced, I have a young school aged child and I work. My phone number changed last month but I was n't in a hurry to update my information because they constantly called on the XXXX ( the due date ) and throughout the month until the payment posts, also because I 've made the proper payment every month. We have n't had a conversation in regards to changing the payment due date if my paying on the XXXX was an issue, so I 'm not sure what 's going on here. I 'm not going to express the importance of having a vehicle because I 'm sure you know this. I need my car back in the same condition it was picked up in, with all my valuables. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Complaint number XXXX. Federal Law states that the complaint be resolved in 30-days and/or extended only 15 days. 60-days is ILLEGAL. The investigation is being extended another 60-days which is illegal in violation of federal law, Tile 15 USC 1681i ( a ) ( B ) provides in relevant part : Extension of period to reinvestigate : Except as provided in subparagraph ( C ), the 30-day period described in subparagraph ( A ) may be extended for not more than 15 additional days if the consumer reporting agency receives information from the consumer during that 30-day period that is relevant to the reinvestigation. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citibank is calling on Sunday morning at XXXX XXXX ( Arizona time ) for a payment to a past due account. Per the federal guidelines, it states calls can be made between XXXX XXXX - XXXX XXXX on Sundays. This phone call was outside of these hours. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I need your help because I understand I have been a scam victim of sales outboard XXXX XXXX with a bank account in the XXXX XXXX at XXXX, XXXX. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 I made a money transfer to XXXX XXXX head office location XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX related to a purchase of XXXX engineer to sales outboard XXXX XXXX. This purchase has not been received by today. This purchase was performed with all customs fee included. However, new fees for the custom were requested per vendor due to change of XXXX custom policies. These fees were pay with the warranty that if extra fees were requested, my money will be return with 48 hours. The new fees were requested, and then I requested my money back. I understand I am a victim of scam. My bank contacted the XXXX XXXX in order to reclaim my money {$8200.00} XXXX. The response per my bank was that the XXXX can not return the money back because their was not money it the vendors account. I have all the evidence of emails between me and the vendor with the warranty of get my money back. In addition I paid {$1900.00} US to XXXX customs through moneygrams transactions, I have evidence of all the payments. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have contacted Experian on several occasions by phone for assistance at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and through their website to dispute several inquiries that appear on my credit report I did not initiate or authorize. Furthermore I have asked Experian to contact each of this companies to request proof of me requesting credit or completing credit application. I would like for all inquiries highlighted on attached credit report to be removed 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been watching the current balance of my Wells Fargo checking account very carefully over the past few days in order to not incur an overdraft fee, and I have been transferring funds from my savings account to maintain a positive balance. I have taken a snapshot of my checking account balance page as displayed at the XXXX website, and the account never goes negative. I called to complain, and they offered to restore XXXX of the {$35.00} dollar charge, which makes no sense whatsoever, because they should n't have charged me the fee to begin with. 

They are claiming that the XXXX charge that shows as a pending transaction on the attached screenshot on XXXX/XXXX/2015 was actually deducted on XXXX/XXXX/2015, resulting in a negative balance. If a charge is shown at their website as currently pending, I do n't understand how it can possibly be deducted from my account XXXX days prior. You will note that I deposited {$11.00} on the XXXX, having seen the pending XXXX 's charge at the website prior to it 's being deducted from the account balance. I have also transferred an additional {$7.00} to further avoid receiving an overdraft fee for the pending BIGFISHGAMES charge. The available balance of - {$34.00}, as shown at the bottom of the " Activity Summary '' section is entirely due to their overdraft fee of {$35.00}, otherwise the account would still show a small positive balance of XXXX cents. 'Wells Fargo has pulled this kind of ridiculous nonsense on me in the past, and I notified your agency last year when they attempted this same thing. After being contacted by you at that time, they relented on XXXX {$35.00} overdraft charges, but worded it in such a way as to make it appear that your agency 's involvement in the matter had nothing to do with their decision to restore my funds, and that they were just being big-hearted, customer-friendly, respectable business people in making that decision. 

If it was n't so difficult to change banks, I would drop WF in a heartbeat, but I 'm not altogether convinced that the situation would improve by taking my business elsewhere. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I did receive notification of debt, however, I was not given my full XXXX days to dispute. I called the day I received the validation letter XXXX/XXXX/15. I asked what this was for as I had never received anything other then this letter, they said a XXXX item could n't tell me what it was for. I advised them I would contact my insurance company and said if this is a sling I will dispute the charges. I contacted ins. They tried to reach out to the original client about what the item was because they themselves had denied the claim but she did n't know why either. They were unable to reach out to the due to the fact that they were closed. I called the next day and advised Aargon on XXXX/XXXX/15 and spoke with an XXXX or XXXX ( ca n't remember the name ) and advised them that I was disputing the debt. Verbally, I said this has no effected the credit report and he said no but I needed send in writing I dispute the debt and I only have a week in a half to do so implying to me that it would effect my credit. According to the FDCPA I have a XXXX day validation period to dispute the debt from the day I receive the validation notice not when they get the account in their office. According to the FDCPA the collection agency can not make the consumer think the XXXX Validation Period does n't exist, and the debt collector nor the agency can overshadow the validation period. I had called the day prior stating that I just got the letter. On this day I also asked for an itemization to further explain what the charge was for. On XXXX/XXXX/15 I received an " itemization letter '' stating nothing more then what I was told on the phone " XXXX ''. On that same day I called back and spoke with a XXXX who told me that is all they show. In the conversation he stated well you just said that you were told something different on the phone then in the letter and I advised him no I said I was told the exact same thing which did n't tell me anything on the phone and seeing the same thing in writing does n't tell me anything different. He basically told me I was a liar when he just misheard what I said. That is harassment according to the FDCPA. 
I had n't spoken with this agency again until XXXX/XXXX/15 to get the names of the individuals and spoke with XXXX who then trans me to the Operations Manager XXXX XXXX I asked him for the names of the individuals I had spoken with he refused to give them to me stating it is proprietary information and he only collects information. Advised him that FDCPA had been broken I was going to file a complaint he advised me I could sent that to him in writing but still refused to give me any information I asked to speak with his supervisor and he said that would be the owner and gave me his name. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I received a voicemail informing me that my XXXX 's MasterCard was flagged for fraud, and that there may be a hold on my account. I was instructed to call XXXX XXXX XXXX, the same number that left the voicemail. Upon calling, an automated message prompted me to enter my credit card number. I was immediately suspicious, as I do not hand over personal information to a phone number that I did not obtain through a legitimate website and/or company. Instead of entering my credit card number, I repeatedly pressed XXXX and *, as most automated messages will direct you to a human representative when this occurs. The automated message responded that my card number was not valid, and to try again. This process repeated XXXX times until the automated message informed me to call back with my credit card details readily available and I was disconnected. At this point, I contacted Barclay cardmember services using the telephone number provided on the back of my credit card. Upon reaching a representative, I was informed that no fraud had been associated with my account and there were no holds. I was also told that they have been receiving calls from members and nonmembers regarding similar situations. Clearly, the original message I received originated from a phishing attempt. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My husband and I applied for a refinance loan with XXXX XXXX from Good Mortgage. He required us to pay out of pocket about {$850.00} to have our home appraised. Good Mortgage selected the appraiser, XXXX XXXX. In his appraisal, he made several factual errors, and his valuation of {$500000.00} is at least {$50000.00} lower than comparable market values we received. As a result of the low valuation, our refinance application was declined. Both my husband and I have excellent credit, have been steadily employed and our debt-to-loan ratio is acceptable. The valuation is the only element of our application that prevented us from refinancing our home. We sent a response to Good Mortgage, pointing our the errors in the appraisal and other issues that we had with the appraiser 's valuation. [ Please note that I also recently noticed that the appraiser excluded the XXXX and XXXX of the XXXX bathrooms in his appraisal. These inaccuracies should also be addressed in a corrected appraisal. ] The loan officer responded that the 'appraiser will not budge. ' We requested to see the response that he had received from the appraiser, but the loan officer refused to provide it to us. We feel that the appraisal should have been reassigned if the appraiser refused to correct the inaccuracies. The ordeal has cost us both time and money, and we may not be able to keep this property as a result. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Regarding my previous complaint I have spoken to the bank and they do n't want to lower our payments and say that we should do liquidation. I do n't want to lose my home and I do n't want to do a short sale. I 'm willing to pay however the payments the bank wants are outrageous. 
My complain was : We requested a modification from Bank of America they put us on a trial payment after making the payments of {$1300.00} for 3 months and after telling us we will get a better deal how ever they did not modify the loan at all. The interest rate and monthly payments remain the same, they did not modify anything. We were atempting to get a loan modification from the bank for more then 4 years. And they also deferd all the principle to the end of the loan term. Also the market value of the proparty is around {$200000.00} and the bank put {$350000.00}. Basically the loan was not modified. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have an account with TransUnion that allows me to view mt credit report and credit score. The score that Transunion publishes is called a XXXX ( TM ). They listed my score as XXXX. I contacted a mortgage company for a Refinance, and they told me that based on their model, my score is XXXX. Even though I understand that there are different criteria and methods for calculating a score, one would not understand there could be such a large discrepancy. I was mislead by the high score calculated by Transunion criteria. Now I am at a great disadvantage having made plans to refinance at this time.What recourse do I have, since I am dissatisfied with the service I have paid for with TransUnion for XXXX years at {$17.00} per month? By the way- the lender called the scores entered by the credit bureau services " FAKE-O '' scores instead of FICOH scores. It seems very unfair, how can consumers play this game if we are not on a level playing field. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX didnt provide me with the agreed upon paper or electronic statement for two months. No paper statements ever got to me and then gave me a call on XXXX for the XXXX time. They explained I had a late payment for a bill of about {$12.00}. I explained back I never got a notice or any reminder of that in any possible way other than promotional emails and routine emails. I was promised that if I pay on the phone entire amount plus XXXX month ( not XXXX months! ) of late fees, there will be no problem with credit reporting or anything else. I paid all in full as agreed upon on this first call I got form XXXX. Same day I saw to my surprise and against all that was explained to me on the phone that my account was reported delinquent by XXXX. I called back several times to talk to the XXXX but they didnt want to help or explain why the reporting happened after my account was fully paid. In addition, they only send me a notice to dispute the status of the account only after it was in good standing. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response