AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: Company keeps calling me at work and at home and NEVER identify themselves or company name. They leave leaving threatening messages for fraudulent debt. The message started with " A complaint had been filed against you '' and that I " and or my attorney need to call ''. '' They then threatened to contact my place of employment. I have not received anything in the mail in regard to this nor do I now owe, nor have I ever owed, any bills or other debts. You call the number back and get no information concerning true identity of company. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Debt was paid in XX/XX/XXXX the month it occurred, but keep getting bills and now from Collection agency. Now saying that I showed proof after the bill was sent to Collection Agency. the bill was paid in XX/XX/XXXX and received a notice from Collection Agency in XX/XX/XXXX. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: BEING XXXX BY CASH CALL ON A INSTALLMENT LOAN ... // 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Payments was due on XXXX of XXXX, but was paid on the XXXX. Late fee 's are applicable if paid after XXXX. Received a " Notice of Pre-foreclosure '' by certified mail on XXXX of XXXX stating I had 30 days from the XXXX to discuss Pre-forclosure with them or they would start foreclosure proceedings. If they are going to give me 30 days why do they wait until 6 days into it to tell me by certified mail? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In XXXX, 2014 I received a collection notice from Aargon Collection Agency ( XXXX XXXX XXXX, NV XXXX ) requesting payment for {$7900.00} for an alleged medical bill. 
I immediately responded back, via certified mail, requesting some form of documentation, financial acknowledgement or media. 
After careful review I noticed their was n't any social security number, treatment date or a breakdown of any services provided. 
I wrote back to the collection agency advising them to contact their client and have the account removed, because clearly this was n't my debt and I was never a patient at the facility in question. 
Recently, I pulled my credit profile and noticed the collection agency placed this balance on my credit report knowing they had the wrong person! 
Aargon Collection Agency has clearly violated FDCPA and FCRA and has placed inaccurate information on my credit report knowing they have the wrong person. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I took out a loan over the phone with XXXX/Delbert & westernsky for XXXX at a monthly payment of XXXX a month but after 6 months they said I still owe XXXX and they also put it on my credit and they are not even license my husband had past a way and that left me in a bad financial burden but I did pay them what I borrowed. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX/XXXX/15 I made a settlement agreement in the amount of {$3300.00} with Selip and Stylianou LLP. I agreed to pay this debt once the settlement agreement was received in writing. I did not receive the settlement agreement until XXXX/XXXX/15 and on that same day i mailed a personal bank check in the amount of {$3300.00}. via certified USPS mail. Later on in the afternoon of XXXX/XXXX/15, I went to the ATM to withdraw money and it was then i learned that Selip and Stylianou LLP had placed a levy on my bank account and despite our settlement agreement 3 days prior. I also learned that after my account was levied they illegally withdraw {$1300.00} from my bank account knowing the settlement check in the amount of {$3300.00} was on route to them. Since this time, I have also received notice from my employer that Selip and Stylianou LLP served them with garnishment papers. Prior to the settlement agreement, my debt with selip and stylianou LLP was {$4900.00}. If you add the {$1300.00} that they withdraw from my bank account + {$3300.00}. settlement check, the total that I paid out was {$4900.00} which is {$1300.00} more than the agreed upon settlement that I have in writing. I am requesting a refund of {$1300.00} 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: I am being charged overdrafts fees for transactions that I should n't be. I should only be charged for XXXX overdraft fee and that is when I withdrew {$80.00} from the atm because I have also been having issues trying to get a debit card sent to me. When I withdrew {$80.00} I had money in my account but it was n't enough so that is the only time I should get the fee. Well BB & T decides to process my transactions in the order they want so I occur more fees instead of the order I used my card. So as of XXXX overdraft fees were {$100.00} when I called the customer service line she was supposed to credit XXXX and have a supervisor call. Well today XXXX XXXX 2015 I see I have another overdraft fee for {$72.00} because they charged me {$2.00} for calling them. I called back and was told XXXX thing from customer service and when I called the Branch in XXXX VA off of XXXX XXXX, XXXX told me something different. She also told me a Manager could not help me. I want this taken care of before I get my job to direct deposit my check. I should n't be charged almost {$200.00} for nothing. The only time I used my debit card to overdraft was XXXX time only and that was the last time I used it. If I did n't do that last withdrawal none of this would be happening. Its sad banks manipulate the way they post transactions to occur more fees for their clients. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Multiple recorded calls from XXXX XXXX XXXX about a supposed debt owed to " state of sc '' a state in which i have never lived or worked. 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: I started a modification with my bank in XX/XX/XXXX. I have supplied the bank with all requested documents. I faxed over they do n't receive and I refax then it 's receive it takes several weeks for a response I supply more requested information it takes again several weeks to get no response. It 's has been 7 months. I have complained to the different " relational managers '' some are rude some make notes in my file and others just do n't care. They refuse my request to speak to a supervisor saying they ca n't assit you they will say what I 've said to you. Each day week and months delay creates a further financial hardship. I have paid the amount requested on my loan statement but they the bank and its representatives continue with delays as a form to discourage me. The continue to say as excuses " we have many files, it takes time '', '' the processing team has your file the underwriter will reject your file, " the gatekeepers will recieve your file soon. I did not pay my XX/XX/XXXX mortgage I do n't know what to do. Please help me. Thank you. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am being contacted at my place of employment after I have asked not to be. I offered a payment arrangement that was suitable to me and was laughed at and told " absolutely not ''. I was told that I needed to get a co singer to get a loan or sell something or take money from my XXXX to pay them. The representative kept using my occupation against me " you 're a supervisor then you should know this is irresponsible ''. After stating that I needed to get off the phone because I was at work I was told " you have to call me back today before XXXX, I know you get a break and a lunch ''. I replied that I had to run errands on my lunch and their reply was " they 're not more important than this matter '' an I said actually I have to pay bills on my lunch so yes they are, the reply I received was " I do n't care about your other bills ''. I was also told that there was an attorney present in their office numerous times which I 'm not sure what this had to do with. 

Company response: Company believes complaint represents an opportunity for improvement to better serve consumers
Consumer complaint: My account with Bank of America is in good standing but, after my XXXX daughter had problems with her account they started mixing things up with me. 
Now their telling me that my account was closed even though they just sent me a new card and I even was able to activate it and my account is at XXXX balance. 
They claim its because of my past credit problems after the passing of my wife and are now corrected but, when they were n't corrected they did n't have a problem keeping my account open. How can they justify closing my account that is in good standing for years and say its because of thepast with someone else but, has been fixed? 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been unable to get a credit report from experian. I believe there are wrong information and would like to review all of my credit scores. I have n't had a credit card in a long time and need to find out what is on the credit reports they say I am entitled to a free report but ca n't seem to get in contact by phone or online. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I returned merchandise to Macy 's and filled out the form requesting credit to the Macy 's accounts. However they continually issue a gift card for which I did not request forcing me to go through the process of requesting a reversal to the credit card. However during this time they are charging me interest of the gift card and they do not issue credit for the interest when and if the credit is reverse. Right now I am waiting on XXXX reversals however I am having trouble get them reversed. Its taking to much time and I will be paying the interest. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Enhanced recovery placed a new collection account on my credit report. The original account was settled thrust XXXX on XXXX. XXXX telephone number is XXXX address XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Nebraska XXXX. Per my credit report the file states closed and paid with a, XXXX balance 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Transunion is reporting on report XXXX account is reporting wrong date of first delinquency. XXXX account was sold/transferred XXXX times. Date of first delinquency for XXXX account, original date is XX/XX/XXXX not XX/XX/XXXX. I have disputed several times and sent documents for support. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Collection Agency : XXXXIs reporting inaccurate collections account on my credit file. I have disputed this account several months ago and they still refuse to remove it from my credit file. The last time I spoke with someone from the collection agency on XXXX/XXXX/15, the lady said that i had to give them 30 days to investigate. Although it had already been 2 months, I decided to wait 30 more days. I called today XXXX/XXXX/15 and the guy that I talked to today acknowledged that it had been more than 30 days since I last spoke with them on ( XXXX/XXXX/15 ) but told me I still had to wait because they still had n't received the info they were waiting on from the original creditor. I told him this inaccurate information is destroying my credit and I have been patient with them for at least 90 days but was still told I had to wait longer and they would call me if they heard anything. My original dispute was in XXXX 2015 and as of today ( XXXX/XXXX/15 ) this inaccurate account is still on my credit report. I am very disappointed because this collection agency still refuses to remove this from my credit file even though they have not been able to validate it. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I contacted Consumer Real Estate Finance Co about obtaining a USDA loan to purchase a home. I was told I qualified and we started the process. I signed a contract on a house on XXXX XXXX, 2015. Since that time we have not closed, I have spent {$1800.00} for deposits, appraisals, inspections, etc and the mortgage company has not given us any closing date. We have had to extend the contract date XXXX and my latest expiration is XXXX XXXX. As of today my file still has not moved out of Underwriting and the mortgage company is not returning my phone calls or emails. They are also not returning my real estate agents calls or emails. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Had a SEARS account since 1975 in good standingAttempted to buy a book on XXXX and it was declinedOn their website, my account looks fine, no cancellation or negative information of any kind! 
Selected CHAT and was just now informed that my {$2000.00} line of credit/card was cancelled at sometime due to inactivity! With absolutely NO prior written notice as required by law, I believeThe CHAT female even hung up on my cut me off 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I receive XXXX calls per day from my financier when I am even XXXX day late on my payment. I answer the phone and tell the company that I am at work and they insist that I explain the situation causing me to be XXXX day late on my payment. If I explain they call back the very next day and demand I explain the situation again. I have asked that they not call so many times per day because it interrupts my work and they make statements saying it is not important when they call or how many times they call but what is important is that I make my payment. I have never made a payment more than 30 days late and I have been with this company for 16 months. They have offered me payment arrangements which I have accepted but the day after the payment arrangement is made and after I inform them of when I will be able to become current on my account they resume the harrassing phone calls. XXXX of the CSRs made a disrespectful statement about me having to accept the terms of the payment arrangement. He said " Well you only paid {$50.00} dollars '', which was the amount they offered for me to pay to become current on my payment. They begin calling at XXXX XXXX every weekday and saturday and even called XXXX times on XXXX XXXX. They stop calling at XXXX XXXX each day. They very seldom leave voicemail messages but when I call XXXX of the XXXX phone numbers they regularly call from it is this company. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I called Netspend and was told I could n't open a account because I have to many cards open. I told the representative I lost my DL, bank card and social security card back and 2010. I never open cards with them and I would like to. I was denied. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Information that is XXXX years old is still on my credit report. I have filed a dispute with the XXXX, but the information is still there. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: ProCollect has an incorrect line item on my credit report with XXXX that I disputed in 2011 and they refuse to remove it. The person 's name is XXXX XXXX ... that is NOT my name. 
Procollect , Inc. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, Texas XXXX mapOffice : XXXX or XXXXXXXXFax : XXXXXXXXCorrespondence to Collectors : XXXXXXXXCorporate DirectoryXXXX XXXX - PresidentXXXX XXXX - Vice President / Director of Recovery OperationsXXXX XXXX XXXX Client Services ManagerXXXX XXXX - IT Department Manager 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I opened B of A credit card and within a month I got unauthorized charges. My replacement card that was overnighted to me on XXXX was showing as received at my XXXX XXXX address. However, was never received by me at my address. Apparently it was activated from a phone other than mine using my security questions. Which means it had to be activated by a B of A employee. Within a day there 's been almost a thousand dollars of unauthorized charges. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am recently divorced. My ex-wife and I both purchased automobiles through XXXX XXXX XXXX on our own individual cognizence without involving the other party. XXXX of these debts show up on my credit report. She is responsible for her own debts in the settlement order. The load she made at XXXX is the responsibilty of XXXX XXXX alone. Please tell me how to get this removed from my credit report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I applied and received {$50000.00} from the Hardest Hit Principal Reduction Program. The money was sent to my mortgage come in XXXX 2014. The applied {$48000.00} and took the difference and paid my XXXX payment and applied some to late fees. In late XXXX the funds were reversed and sat in a suspense account and no one was able to explain why it was reversed. It was then applied and reversed XXXX more times and each time money was taken away from the principal. To date only a little over {$44000.00} was applied toward the principal and I was told they took the remaining {$5000.00} or more dollars and paid my XXXX, XXXX and XXXX payment which I have been paying my monthly mortgage. In XXXX explanation they said they were given directives to do it this way then they said they never received any doucumentation as to what to do with the money and it is their perrogative to do what they want and I have no say so in the matter. It is the least to say that this has been fraustrating. So many agents have been dealing with this matter that it is now a total mess and what seemed to be a gift to help with my underwater mortgage has now been turned into a nightmare. I need hellp being directed to the right agency who can speak for me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been locked out of my checking account with Suntrust bank for 2 weeks. After speaking with customer service, I was told it was locked due to a questionable check. I went into a branch and they told me it was turned over the the fraud department and told me it was a check for XXXX from XXXX, which was my daughters payroll check. She had deposited XXXX prior to this with no issues. My daughter contacted the payroll department at her work and they assured her the check was fine. They emailed a few days later and told her the check cleared on the XXXX of XXXX which was the day after she deposited it. 
A Suntrust employee at the branch spoke very rudely to me and treated me as if I were in the wrong. She told me I had to just wait and see if Suntrust wanted to terminate the relationship they have with me. Meanwhile they would hold on to my money with no further explanation. When I asked why someone did n't call me or contact me when the check in question arose, she said she could n't speak to me about it any further and I would have to just wait to hear from them. I asked how long that would be, she said indefinitely. I asked by what means they would contact me and she stated it would be either by phone, email or regular XXXX. It has been 2 weeks and I have heard nothing and my account is still unobtainable. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX children submitted a Power of Attorney form to the Bank of America office in XXXX XXXX, Virginia at least five weeks ago on a Saturday. The representative told us they would send a copy to their Legal Department for authentification and it would take about XXXX hours for a reply. Each week since I have called or gone to the bank and have been put off for XXXX reason or another. Five weeks is too long I believe. Can you Help. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Failed to stop sending notices, failed to provided details of amt due, fialed to send request information per my letters. 

Violated Fair Credit Collection Laws. Fail to response to my letters requests. 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: Here 's my experiance : About two weeks ago, I logged on to Experian, put in my sensitive personal information, and was given the choice of spending about {$30.00} to get ALL XXXX credit reports, or spend NOTHING, and just get the Experian report. OR ( and this is what I did ), I could pay a BUCK ( {$1.00} ) and also get my FICO score, which one does not normally get with the free report. 

So that 's what I did. Except, in tiny letters, it says, " Includes 7-day trial membership ... '' It does n't say that there 's a COST associated with it. Just that you 're automatically enrolled. And there 's no way to opt out before paying that {$1.00}. 

But there IS a cost associated with it. It 's {$19.00}. However, I just found out that cost 2 WEEKS after I thought I had gotten my credit report and FICO score from them. It finally showed up on my on-line bank statement a day or two ago. By the way, when I got the " Welcome to the club! '' email from Experian, it still said NOTHING about the cost, or that it was a recurring monthly cost. 

So I called Experian 's customer support. Experian says you can cancel. So I did. We shall see if that " takes. '' I give them a XXXX/XXXX chance. 

They also say that you can be refunded your " prorated amount when you cancel. '' That has turned out to be a lie, since they repeatedly refused to refund me ANYTHING. 

But I never agreed to $ XXXX/MONTH, and there was no " Opt Out '' feature when I thought I was paying {$1.00} for the FICO score XXXX Therefore, I demanded full reimbursement. They refused. 

What I wound up doing is calling my bank, and disputing the charge. Also, contacting Experian 's billing department to demand full reimbursement. 

And I figured YOU guys might be interested, since ( from a XXXX article ) : '' In XXXX 2005, Experian accepted a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) over charges that Experian had violated a previous settlement with the FTC. The FTC 's allegations concerned customers who signed up for the " free credit report '' at Experian 's Consumerinfo.com site. The FTC alleged that ads for the " free credit report '' did not adequately disclose that Experian would automatically enroll customers in Experian 's {$79.00} credit-monitoring program. " Thank you for your time. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response