AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: I entered into a thirty day escrow to purchase a home on XXXX XXXX XXXX. I had been in contact with Sierra Pacific Mortgage prior to the offer and they indicated a willingness to serve as my mortgage broker. Upon opening of escrow Sierra Pacific Mortgage proceeded to start a loan application process. I received a mortgage report on XXXX XXXX XXXX and a request for documents required to process the loan from the Sierra Pacific Mortgage office at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, # XXXX, XXXX, CA XXXX. Close of escrow was identified as XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX. All documents requested by Sierra Pacific Mortgage were provided to them by XXXX XXXX. The documents included copies of my joint XXXX and XXXX tax returns. I had not yet filed our XXXX return. Sierra Pacific Mortgage also requested a form XXXX be completed and signed by myself and my wife. This was done and provided to Sierra Pacific Mortgage on XXXX XXXX. A Uniform Residential Loan Application was completed and submitted to Sierra Pacific Mortgage on that same date. Sierra Pacific Mortgage made a request for some detailed information on XXXX XXXX which was promptly provided. On XXXX XXXX we received an email from Sierra Pacific Mortgage saying ; " Great news, we have loan approval and you can release the loan and appraisal contingencies. '' We did release the loan contingency on this advice and that of our realtor. In fact, the loan was not approved and ready by the agreed to closing date of XXXX XXXX. We were forced to submit a Closing Date Extension request to the sellers which they accepted with no penalty to us. A new closing date of XXXX XX/XX/XXXX was requested in the extension. Additional loan-related information was requested by Sierra Pacific Mortgage on XXXX XX/XX/XXXX and promptly provided to them. On XXXX XX/XX/XXXX I asked Sierra Pacific Mortgage, " Did we provide everything you needed for the last set on contingencies? '' The reply was, " Yes, I believe so. I sent everything to the underwriter this morning. These conditions get reviewed and signed off, we will be able to get docs early next week. '' The XXXX of XXXX XXXX was a Saturday, upon hearing this clearly closure on the XXXX was not going to be possible. Our realtor sought another Closing Date Extension from the sellers. The sellers accepted but this time sought compensation ; " Sellers credit to buyers of closing costs per Addendum No. XXXX dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX shall be reduced from XXXX to {$1000.00}. '' We accepted rather than risk losing our entire deposit but lost {$1000.00} by doing so. We received word on XXXX XX/XX/XXXX from Sierra Pacific Mortgage ; " We have funding the loan and will let you know once XXXX XXXX XXXX has received the wire and property is recorded with the county. " We feel Sierra Pacific Mortgage lead us to believe they could provide a loan within the original XXXX escrow time period, and continued to do so at Loan contingency release, and also during the XXXX extension to XXXX XX/XX/XXXX. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: After becoming a victim of ID Theft, I obtained a police report from my local police department. With that, I notified all XXXX credit agencies, to put a fraud alert, or freeze my reports. I then filed a complaint with the FTC, and combined that with my police report, and wrote a detailed letter to Experian, explaining exactly which accounts have been effected by identity theft. I send these certified mail, and it has cost me nearly {$40.00} in mail. 
They simply respond with apparent " Stall Tactics ''. XXXX reply dated XXXX XXXX, says " Take some time and review your credit report, look for fraudulent activity '' I clearly told them of each account. I immediately contacted the Fraud department at Experian, with my " CreditCheck Monitoring '' service I have paid for for several years. The man I spoke with, said he thinks the police report looks " Fake '' and laughed. 
I assured him, it was not fake, and to contact the officer to verify the information. He advised me, this police report was not notarized, and therefore worthless. I got the document notorized, and faxed it to the Experian Fraud department. I followed up, with the notarized copy of the police report, and notarized FTC report. 
Experian 's response on XXXX XXXX, is to now include more information. Now it must have nearly XXXX additional pieces of information, I have already provided. 
I contacted the police department, and they do not complete separate police reports, simply because XXXX credit reporting agency refuses to comply with the law. 
Experian refuses to block the fraudulent information from my report. I am trying to keep up with this fraud as its piling up, and they will not even begin assisting me. I have spent XXXX dollars providing them all this information, by taking time off work, visiting police stations, and investigating several databases. They MUST start doing their job! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: trans union and XXXX I could n't get my credit reports. my XXXX report I recieved but not the others 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: We filed for Bankruptcy in XX/XX/XXXX and our case was discharged as planned. However TramsUnion has been has continued to report the XXXX credit card info that has been discharged. I 've gone back to the bankruptcy lawyer that assisted us in the bankruptcy but we have not gotten resolution. We would like XXXX XXXX stopped reporting to my credit report per our bankruptcy. Last reporting date was XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXCreditCardXXXX XXXX XXXXLast Past Due : XXXX/XXXX90+ Days : XXXX/XXXXXXXX : DEBT INCLUDED IN OR DISCHARGED THRU BK XXXX : ACCOUNT DELINQUENT 180 DAYS PAST DUE DATEXXXX : BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX REV XXXX XXXX C XXXX 1963 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXCreditCardXXXX XXXX XXXX30 Days : XXXX/XXXX60 Days : XXXX/XXXX90+ Days : XXXX, XXXX, XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Commonwealth Financial keeps calling me on my cell phone over and over. Each time I speak to a rep there, they claim that they do not have the number they are calling in my system, yet I use my cell phone to tap the incoming number when I 'm calling them back. I have asked them numerous times to remove my number since I have no business with them and they have no business with me. Please help me make them stop calling my phone. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: In 2008 I met a gentleman by the name of XXXX XXXX. His home address is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX. His mobile phone number is XXXX. He told me that he was selling homes that he owned at a great price and that there would be a {$10000.00} USD profit pay-out at closing if I decided to purchase. He also advised that I contact a mortgage broker that he works with named XXXX XXXX. Her company is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX. The address is XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX. Her office number is XXXX and her mobile number is XXXX. The first time I met XXXX, XXXX, myself, and my sister were all in her office at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX at XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX, FL XXXX. She and XXXX were explaining that I would generate $ XXXX to do the repairs and upgrades to the home upon closing on XXXX of XXXX 's homes that he was selling. The address of the home that I purchased and currently occupy is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX never took me to the home to look around and check it out. She never advised that I should take such actions either. Still, XXXX ( the seller ) told me that the sales price would be {$170000.00} USD. Upon getting a pre-approval and an approval for an FHA mortgage from a private financial intermediary ( XXXX of who I also believe partook in this mortgage fraud ), XXXX never mentioned that I would be required to put a down payment on the home, let alone 3.5 %. I believe that a private lender financed the home and sold the mortgage to SUNTRUST BANK in addition to an inflated interest rate. Furthermore, according to the credit history, strength and income-to-debt ratio, the SUNTRUST agent should have known that it was a fraudulent transaction. I was under the false pretense that I would be receiving 100 % financing, get the additional $ XXXX to do the repairs and upgrades on the home, and have the closing cost paid by the seller. There was an appraisal conducted by XXXX XXXX from XXXX. The location is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; XXXX XXXX # XXXX ; XXXX, FL XXXX. Her mobile number is XXXX and the office number is XXXX. She appraised the home at $ XXXXUSD. I also believe that the appraiser inflated the value of the home in accordance to this ordeal. Around XX/XX/2008, I received a call from XXXX to come to her office. She advised me that " the bank '' was having problems approving the loan and that she would have to increase the price of the home from {$170000.00} to {$180000.00} USD in order to get an approval. I had recently signed a contract on the home for {$170000.00}. She assured me that it was n't going to make a difference because I would now be receiving the amount of {$25000.00} USD. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: See attached. A debt collection agency has placed a negative trade line on my credit report without providing the validation of debt requested and a reasonable opportunity to investigate the putative debt. This is important because ( XXXX ) I previously owed money to the original creditor that was handled by Focused Recovery that was discharged in a Chapter XXXX bankruptcy and ( XXXX ) I may have been a victim of identity theft. A full legal analysis and memorandum of facts necessary to adjudicate my claim are attached. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This company is supposedly collecting on an auto loan which was paid. The company they are collecting for is in the name of Sharon Holding Corp. which I have no idea who this is. They and the attorney have harrassed me in so many ways. They have threatened to garnish my wages, have me arrested and levied upon my bank account before a set court date. They will not supply any paperwork to me regarding this debt after many attempts to have them submitted to me. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: USBank provided an email claiming " Earn 20 % MORE REWARD POINTS on purchases made with your XXXX REWARDS XXXX Card through XXXX XXXX! '' However, very few people will receive any extra points. Fine print states you first have to spend {$2700.00}. Then XXXX reward points are earned per dollar only on " additional net purchases ''. That 's like advertising 20 % off the last {$10.00} you spend on a {$100.00} shirt, which is really only 2 % off. Most people will use the card more thinking they will get 20 % more rewards when in reality they will get no more reward on the XXXX {$2700.00} they spend. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: REGARDING A CLOSED DEBIT ACCOUNT WITH WELLS FARGO. XXXX, 2014, MADE AN ONLINE PURCHASE WITH XXXX XXXX. TICKET WAS NEVER USED. XXXX, 2015, XXXX AGREED TO REFUND MY PURCHASE. THEY SAID THE CREDIT HAD TO GO BACK TO THE ORIGINAL DEBIT/CREDIT ACCOUNT. EXPLAINED TO XXXX ... MY ACCOUNT WAS CLOSED. IT WAS SUGGESTED TO CALL WELLS FARGO AND EXPLAIN TO THEM A CREDIT WAS COMING ... AND, TO ISSUE A PAPER CHECK TO ME UPON RECEIPT. WFB, AGREED. CONTACTED XXXX TO TELL THEM GO AHEAD AND PROCESS THE CREDIT TO WFB BASED ON THE COMMITMENT GIVEN TO ME BY WFB. HOWEVER, WHEN WFB RECEIVED THE CREDIT ... THEY DIVERTED THE FUNDS TO MY CLOSED ACCOUNT STATING I HAD A NEGATIVE BALANCE. BELIEVE WFB ERRED AGAINST THEIR POLICY. THE PRESIDENT OF THEIR DEBIT/ATM DIVISION INFORMED ME ... IF THE ACCOUNT HAS BEEN CLOSED FOR 30 DAYS OR MORE ... THE CREDIT IS RETURNED TO THE MERCHANT. BECAUSE WFB WAS ALERTED TO THIS INCOMING CREDIT ... THEY SAW THE OPPORTUNITY TO DIVERT THE FUNDS. THE CREDIT WAS NOT INTENDED TO BE POSTED TO MY CLOSED ACCOUNT. WFB HAD NO RIGHT TO TAKE THESE FUNDS. ONCE AN ACCOUNT IS CLOSED ... TRANSACTIONS CA N'T BE POSTED AGAINST THE ACCOUNT. WFB MADE A COMMITMENT TO ME HOW THE INCOMING CREDIT WOULD BE HANDLED ... THEY IGNORED THIS COMMITMENT. I KNOW FOR A FACT IF I HAD N'T ALERTED WFB TO THE INCOMING CREDIT ... IT WOULD HAVE BEEN RETURNED BY THEIR SYSTEM TO XXXX AS AN UNIDENTIFIED CREDIT. ADDITIONALLY, VISA, INTERNATIONAL INFORMED ME XXXX HAS THE ABILITY TO REVERSE THE CREDIT TRANSACTION. MORE DOCUMENTATION IS AVAILABLE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. PLEASE EXCUSE THE UPPER CASE LETTERS ... HAVING A PROBLEM WITH THE KEYBOARD. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Wells Fargo & Company, has refused to provide me a referral to Identity Theft Assistance Center ( ITAC ). Because I have been a victim of identity theft I have been subject to significant financial problems and expenses as a result of Wells Fargo & Company failing to provide a referral to ITAC. 

I am demanding immediately, that Wells Fargo & Company provide me a referral to ITAC. My phone number is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and Wells Fargo & Company can also contact me via email at XXXXXXXXXXXX, as well as via physical mail to the following address XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX look forward to working with ITAC XXXX an effort to resolve Identity Theft issues and expenses. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX, I contacted a customer service rep at Sears Credit Card. I arranged via phone to pay the credit card off. With Sears writing off some interest, the total amount that the representative told me to XXXX this card out was {$2000.00}. I paid that amount during this same phone call and was even offered the opportunity to now transfer other credit card balances to this account that may be high interest. On XXXX, I noticed that instead of a XXXX balance, my balance showed {$290.00} after payment. I e-mailed Sears about this and ultimately received an e-mail to contact them directly that these matters do n't get handled through e-mail. On this date I reached an individual on the phone who identified himself as XXXX. I explained the above to him and ultimately he said that even though I was told that the account would be XXXX after payment that it was still my responsibility to pay this new balance. He even went so far as to say that I get statements which I told him that I did not get paper statements that I could still log in and get my balance. I told him I understood all of that but in the end I had a live representative on the phone telling me account information and confirming XXXX that after payment my account would be XXXX. In getting no where with XXXX, I asked to speak to someone else in charge and he refused to do so after several attempts, he kept saying that I was accountable. I then asked direct questions as to whether or not he was refusing to give me another rep and ultimately, he said he would and put me on hold. He then came back briefly to tell me he 'd be sending me to a rep. I waited on the phone afterwards about XXXX minutes without feedback from anyone until I hung up. My total call time was XXXX minutes. I would like for Sears to honor what I was told and XXXX my account out. If this does not occur, I will certainly have no choice in paying this additional amount of {$290.00} and will then promptly close this account. I am amazed that even though I talked with their own account rep that ultimately I 'm told that even though they said that, it 's not true. These are shady business practices and XXXX needs to be dealt with regarding his poor, customer service skills as well as keeping me on hold without feedback or another representative getting on the line. I guess he got his revenge against me for questioning him and Sears by placing me on hold and no one coming to the phone. Nice tactic!!!! 

XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had been trying to get my APR correctly reflected to the 6 % as required by law underneath SCRA and the company is refused to adjust after, numerous email, calls and letters. I have since canceled the line of credit, credit card with them and just would like fees and interest returned to me in the amount of {$61.00} 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: US Bank XXXX XXXX Visa Card 's marketed a number of benefits when you pay the annual fee to have the card. The primary XXXX being a free reward night whenever you redeem points for XXXX or more nights. They are removing this feature today, with short notice. They are n't offering any compensation, nor extending the benefit to the renewal date. Forcing me to use all my accumulated benefits prematurely or risk losing 25 % -50 % of their value. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: sls specialized loan servicing llc mortgage brought my mortgage in XX/XX/XXXX and been making it very hard to pay and then adding late fees when I cant get any one to take payment then when I try to pay wont let me they say I owe next month before it even comes thanks for trying to help 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been trying to work with Wells Fargo for over a year on the short sale of a XXXX property.I have provided Wells Fargo with all requested documentation to process the short sale, and have a short sale offer on the property. Over the course of a year, Wells Fargo on several occasions has denied receiving documents despite documents being sent on multiple occasions. They have not returned phone calls, have taken actions, such as placing the home out of short sale and into foreclosure without explanation and refusal to give explanation, and have not explained essential information regarding their processes for the consumer and realtor. A short sale proceeding that could have been resolved by XX/XX/XXXX, continues. The latest report from Wells Fargo is that the short sale request is being reassigned to another negotiator in their liquidation department, with refusal to explain why the short sale is being reassigned. In addition Wells Fargo is again reporting they have missing documentation required to proceed with the process, despite it being provided previously to proceed with the short sale up to this point in time. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I tried to get my APR correctly reflected to the 6 % as required by law underneath SCRA and the company is refusing to adjust after, numerous email, calls and letters. They chose not too and I eventually canceled my card even after stating I would due to their non-complience 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX paid part of a bill for a medical XXXX fee in XXXX 2012 and failed to automatically pass the remainder on to my supplemental insurance company. I can get little information from XXXX about what happened to the remained as they do n't seem to know and can not get any information. The original lab fee bill to XXXX was in the amount of {$590.00} of which XXXX paid an unknown amount but failed to automatically send the remaining amount of {$200.00} to XXXX XXXX XXXX which has my supplemental insurance. I can get no information from XXXX about my account # so I can get no information there. I need to know how I can get XXXX to send this {$200.00} on to XXXX XXXX XXXX as I have been getting Collection Agency bills for XXXX years. Can you help me. We can not afford to pay this bill which we do not owe. We pay more than {$5000.00} a year for this supplemental insurance. Somebody has messed up on this bill, whether it is XXXX or their vendors. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I keep getting getting a call from this company every day and they never leave a message, and I 'm unable to call them back and find out what they want or who they 're looking for. A message comes up that this number can not be reached. I want these calls stopped. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Debt to XXXX was satisfied when account was closed and all equipment was returned, XXXX 2014. NO further contact from XXXX XXXX, however, 13 months later this " collection '' shows up on on my credit report. NO prior written or phone communication. I have attempted to contact this Debt Collector and can not get any information pertaining to my account from them. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I paid UAC the settlement amount of {$1800.00} back in XX/XX/XXXX, but I never received any correspondence or my release of lien from UAC. I have not received any form of communication from UAC. I want my debt settled and I want to receive my release of lien document so I can get a clean title to my XX/XX/XXXX Mercury Mountaineer. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I dispute the validity of this entire debt. I am invoking Texas Finance Code 392.202 CORRECTION OF THIRD-PARTY DEBT COLLECTOR 'S OR CREDIT BUREAU 'S FILES. The XXXX is not bonded in Texas and is acting illegally. They will not send me proof of not being bonded in Texas so I can not send proof to the credit bureaus to remove these charges that I am not liable for. They also will not send me any proof that they have any sort of contract with the hospital that they say I had procedures at. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This has been paid and has been verified with the original crediting company. 

Company response: Company disputes the facts presented in the complaint
Consumer complaint: After I married my XXXX husband, I moved from XXXX to XXXX. It took me forever to locate a job and we became severely behind on this car payment. Fees were minimal however it greatly ruined my credit and they kept reporting and would not due anything after various letter, emails and call 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have had a loan for over 9 years for my mortgage. The loan started with countrywide and fha (Now Bank of America) and was a predatory loan with high rates and an extremely high pmi of $XXXX per month. I was promised by the persons doing the loan XXXX and XXXX that they would look for a better product after signing. however, 90 days afterward they XXXX went into hiding. Once XXXX was reached, he stated "they don't even do those types of loans anymore" they were very bad.  I am highly confused as to how the FHA would allow for such a loan myself.  Fast forward ...I have requested numerous times to have the pmi dropped and found out from XXXX of the reps at Bank of America that the pmi should drop off after so many years. Recently I tried to request again and was turned down by BOA.  The pmi is now $XXXX per month and has caused me problems financially in the past.  I am simply requesting that the pmi be dropped to zero due to the age and monies already collected or lowered to a more manageable amount of
less than $200 per month. This is not a refinance request but a request that predatory practices on the pmi be stopped. No one pays the amount of a car payment or more for a monthly pmi.
Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response