AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: XX/XX/XXXX I mortgaged ( through a HARP loan ) my property located at XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, RI to Green Tree XXXX and had my taxes escrowed. Taxes on this property are $ XXXX/yr. ( $ XXXX/quarter ). An amount of {$350.00} was transferred from the previous lender into the new escrow account. Monthly escrow was set at {$180.00}. XX/XX/XXXX they paid the quarterly taxes of {$560.00}. In XXXX they paid the quarterly taxes but in the wrong amount. They paid {$580.00}. The tax collector called me and alerted me to a problem. I called the bank and I thought it was all taken care of. 
XX/XX/XXXX they paid {$560.00} which was the correct amount. But in XXXX they paid {$1100.00}. The amount they paid was a combination of my XXXX properties. Again XX/XX/XXXX they paid {$1100.00}. XX/XX/XXXX I received an Escrow Disclosure Statement telling me I am XXXX dollars behind in my taxes. I have sat on the telephone with the bank from XXXX of this year until last week when I finally gave up. They have people dunning my account and telling me to pay up or else. XXXX XXXX XXXX unnamed ) and I had a shouting match and he told me if I did not pay all of this money owed they would foreclose on my home. I did not do anything wrong. They made the mistake and they need to fix it. Every time I called them to get things straightened out they said they needed to investigate and after each investigation they always came back with the same results and that is I owe them XXXX dollars and I better pay up. I have only had this mortgage for one year and it should not be that difficult for them to figure out what they did wrong. I am at wits end and need help. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: This complaint is regarding Home Depot Credit Services who has billed me {$1900.00} in interest charges on a 24 month no interest promotion. In those 24 months, I made payments in the amount of {$4800.00} of which only {$190.00} was applied by Home Depot Credit Services to the promotional balance. When I inquired, they said it was my fault for not calling monthly to tell them where to apply my payments whereas my payment should have been applied to the promotion first ( which does n't account for the {$190.00} credit that I never called them about either ). I would like to know if I have any worthwhile case against Home Depot to remove this interest fee based on my making above-the-minimum-payment each month as was required of me. Home Depot presses that it is my fault for not calling them monthly and for not reading my statement each month, which in the years XX/XX/XXXX-XX/XX/XXXX Home Depot is well aware that online banking exists rampantly and the consumer should feel safe in making regular payments through his bank without reading the " fine lines '' of every billing statement. They count on this for their bottom line as opposed to any concern for the consumer. If even just the payment amount over the minumum payment is applied to the promotional balance, in the last 12 months ( not 24, which the promotional period is for, but for which I do not have statements currently ), then I have paid {$1300.00}, with ( 1 ) shows only one of the two years of payments in the period ; ( 2 ) shows my intent at purposely paying more than the minimum to ensure against incurring an interest fee on the promotion and ( 3 ) ; still begs the question how only {$190.00} was applied to the promotion. While I do n't have the remaining statements showing what I paid above the minimum payment, I have made the request for the archived statements through Home Depot to prove that I should not have incurred the interest on the promotion, based on my having paid Home Depot approximately {$1500.00} more over the past 24 months than the initial promotional balance. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: bought phone from XXXX and got a contract ... but got a really high bill {$180.00}. and told the lady that i was not happy and wanted to go back to prepay ... then they cut me off and said i owe {$810.00}. that is crazy 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have received almost daily calls from XXXX since XXXX/XXXX/15. Each time I answer, there is silence on the other end of the line. I received calls from this phone number on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ( a federal holiday ) at XXXX XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX, and XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX XXXX. 

I looked up the number online and it looks like it might be from Southwest Credit Systems ( a collections agency ) although I have no confirmation of this since no one speaks when I answer the phone. I have never communicated with this agency and just checked all of my accounts and credit reports and nothing is showing overdue or suspicious. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have tried multiple times ( online and by phone ) to obtain my free credit report, both have said my information is not correct and have not been able to get my credit report ( with all XXXX companies ). I lost my social security card and have been denied credit, I just want to make sure no identity theft occurred. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX I purchased a home in the state of AZ. On that day I opened XXXX mortgages ( in other words ... an XXXX split ). In XX/XX/XXXX that property was foreclosed on by XXXX XXXX XXXX via Trustee Sale. Three months before foreclosing XXXX sold the smaller loan to Green Tree. The balance of this loan is considered purchase money as it originated at the same date and time as the 80 % loan ; therefore, this loan meets the requirements for protection under Arizona 's Anti-Deficiency Statutes XXXX ( A ) and XXXX ( G ) ( it was utilized as a single XXXXfamily dwelling and is located on less than XXXX acres ). I have spoken to Green Tree on MULTIPLE occasions over the past 5 years about this issue and they are still reporting that I owe the balance on this loan. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Related Case # XXXXChexSystems had been re-inserted into my credit file derogatory marks from XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

You are required to notify me within five ( 5 ) days of re-inserting a previously deleted item. I did not receive any such notification. Please delete this item immediately. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: A debt collector is reporting the incorrect date of first delinquency on my credit report. I disputed the item and it was verified. In an effort to provide proof of the incorrect reporting to the debt collector, I requested in writing on XXXX/XXXX/15 via certified mail, to Transunion, a copy of the FCRA compliance date/date of first delinquency for the account in question. No where did I list the word dispute. This request was not a dispute. This was a REQUEST to TRANSUNION and not the debt collector. I enclosed a check in the amount of {$11.00}, which is supposed to be the processing fee for said request. I received in the mail a response to my " dispute '' which again was verified. I did not initiate a dispute and Transunion incorrectly initiated one. They sent the information to the debt collector for verification! They did not read my letter and did not attempt to provide the information I requested from them. When I called to request the status of the FCRA compliance date and ask why a dispute was initiated, I was referred to the Special Handling Department who did not understand how to assist me. I was routed to a call center in XXXX, where there is a language barrier and culture barrier. The representative was unable to assist me with my simple request. To date, I still have not received the information I requested, that is supposed to be available to the consumer should they ask for it. Transunion failed to read the request and provide the information I need. They also opened a dispute in which I did NOT REQUEST. However, they cashed me check! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a complaint # XXXX. It has been closed but the issues have not been resolved, nor did I ever hear from anyone. I have a police report. Wells Fargo sent me keys to access my townhouse, but there is no keyhole to put the key in. The front door is sealed without key access. I still have things in the house, and they are aware of this. They leave messages that say, " I have resolved the issue. '' and then close the issue but they never speak to me nor do they resolve the issue. I have lost my XXXX license because I have tax information in the house that was stolen when they changed my locks and the rest is now locked in the house. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The account was deleted by XXXX And Transunion because is from XXXX And more the 7 years has passed but the creditor reinstalled them with a different balance. But it is the same account .XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: The circumstance began when the Indiana Department of Revenue started reaching out to me to collect a debt from a previous employer of mine. The Indiana Department of Revenue contracted with a company called " Premiere Credit XXXX '' to use tactics to collect my old employers debt while I was working with the Indiana Department of Revenue to have me removed from this account. The Indiana department of revenue removed me as a liable party in XXXX 2015 and Premiere Credit continued to collect the debts after this period until they closed the account in XXXX 2015. During this period of time Premiere Credit notified me that they were trying to collect a personal tax debt that I did owe. Premiere sent a garnishment to my employers payroll company. Premiere did not communicate to me that there was this additional debt other than the debt that I had been released from. As soon as I verified this debt to be true it was paid within 2 days of that verification. Premiere had told me that they sent a release to my employer immediately after I paid the balance. Premiere did not communicate the release of the garnishment to my employer for a week after they had told me that they had sent it to my employer. I had to call more than 4 times to premiere and my employer each to verify that the garnishment release had been received. The representatives from premiere were not helpful and disrespectful when I asked for the release to be sent and they would not provide me a fax confirmation that they had sent the release. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Bank Of America Credit Card is failing to give my wife and me a grace period. My wife was XXXX minutes past the due date and they charged me a late fee. After my wife complained they eventually dropped it. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was laid off by my employer for lack of work. I have requested a mortgage modification with my mortgage company Green tree several times for the last 3 years. They will not work with me to modify my mortgage. I was recently sent a property foreclosure sale notice to forecloseon my house XXXX XXXX, 2015. Ditech is my new mortgage company I did not receive a letter stating they were my new mortgage company. I want to keep my house and modify my mortgage. Please assist me with the mortgage modification. and postponing the foreclosure sale date. Thank You 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I paid for medical services with my credit card ( XXXX XXXX XXXX Signature card ). At the time of payment, The Hospital offered a 20 % discount off the bill if the bill was paid before my wife left the hospital. I paid the bill which was {$910.00} ( {$1100.00} minus XXXX % ). Insurance covered more than what The Hospital had calculated because my wife met the out of pocket maximum, so I overpaid. I contacted The Hospital providing all the calculations and how they owed me {$250.00} as a result of the over payment ( actual bill was {$830.00} minus 20 % or {$660.00} XXXX {$660.00} minus {$910.00} is {$250.00}. The Hospital refused to offer a refund so I immediately contacted my credit card to dispute the overcharge. I provided all the necessary information that Bank of America requested in a timely manner, well under the 120 days required by law. Bank of America sat on the request and did nothing. They gave me a case number ( XXXX ), but did absolutely nothing. They did not contact The Hospital ; they did not contact me for clarification ; they did not explain anything in terms of why they would not resolve the case. They just sent me a letter saying it was too late. Bank of America did not do its fiduciary responsibility of investigating the dispute. 
This all happened over many months from XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: RE : Bank Of America Student Credit Card / Timeline of ReportingThis complaint shall serve as formal notice of my Intent to file a lawsuit against Bank Of America, due to its ' blatant and objectionable disregard of the law. 

I can show a judge that these accounts meet the requirements for removal and that they violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by ignoring my requests to delete them. My previous letters -- all sent certified mail -- stated my reasons for an investigation and these reasons were not frivolous in any way. 

This is not a request for validation or verification. 

Violations FCRA Section 611 Part ( A ) ( 1 ) {$1000.00} per violation. 

cc : Law Offices of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX, XXXX XXXX, CA XXXXcc : Board Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX, XXXX XXXXcc : Office of the Comptroller of the CurrencyXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have previously submitted several disputes to Experian regarding my payment history on my XXXX XXXX account. Each time I submit a dispute and provide documentation to support my dispute they state that they can not use the information which in many cases results in my credit report staying the same. Recently XXXX XXXX added a repossession to my credit report on XX/XX/XXXX for the month of XX/XX/XXXX. This lender reported payment status never appeared on my credit report in the past and when I attempted to dispute this with Experian they stated that XXXX said it was valid. This lender reported status was added to my account almost 21 months later without any notification or supporting evidence to show its was valid. In addition to the repossession, XXXX XXXX through the use of the CFPB agreed to change the delinquent status for XX/XX/XXXX on my credit to reflect a positive status. XXXX XXXX never changed the status and a dispute was opened. A copy of the CFPB investigation results presented evidence from the response received from XXXX XXXX that they were to change the status, but Experian failed to utilize this document and again allowed XXXX XXXX to add this information to my report. Also XXXX XXXX has added a XXXX past due for the month of XX/XX/XXXX. This is inaccurate as my XX/XX/XXXX payment is not due until XX/XX/XXXX. Experian seems to allows these inaccuracies to remain on my report without even validating them. After several phone conversations with both XXXX and Experian the issue comes down to date the information was reported. In XX/XX/XXXX Experian stated that XXXX reports the XXXX of each month, but XXXX states that they report the last day of each month. On XX/XX/XXXX I spoke with Experian who stated that XXXX reports to them on the XXXX day of each month which then raises a red flag about some of the statuses on my account. Attached are my past XXXX XXXX XXXX and updates dating back to XX/XX/XXXX. As you see that no repossession was ever reported on my account until XX/XX/2015, also the payment status for XX/XX/XXXX was never changed as stated in the CFPB investigation response. Again all Experian does is call the creditor and ask if the information is valid and pending on what the credit says is how the information is added to the report. Please help because this really making my finances difficult. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Macy 's has changed their online system and as a result I have been unable to access my balance, account information, statements or make a payment online for months. I do not receive a paper statement and have had difficulty getting account and transaction information from telephone. I went into the store received a receipt print out of my balance on XXXX/XXXX/15. I received a slip showing a balance of {$220.00}. I paid that balance in full and made a purchase for {$120.00}. I called XXXX as instructed by the error message when I tried to get my online information, they were unable to assist me in getting online and the telephone rep was confused about my balance. He was unable to give me a balance that makes sense according to the store balance printed on the receipt and the payment I made. I have spent over XXXX minutes on the phone trying to get assistance without resolution and am not sure how I can resolve this at this point. It seems extremely unfair to not provide accurate account transaction and balance information and access to make payments.I typically pay in full and without the ability to know balance information I could have interest charges I would normally not have. They will not give discounts unless you use your card but wo n't provide account and balance information accurately. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: We refinanced our mortgage with Loan Depot. At closing they collected XXXX for the XX/XX/XXXX property taxes. However, this a non-escrow refinance. They claimed that they must collect this outstanding tax to do the closing. Closing on XX/XX/XXXX. Taxes first due XX/XX/XXXX and there is no penalty until after XX/XX/XXXX. I recently call my tax office after I received the tax bill and it was for the full amount. They have no records of having any funds being applied to this account. I called servicing department who referred me to the Loan Depot Escrow Department and they sent me back to the servicing department. I spoke to a manager and they claim it was sent XX/XX/XXXX. I contacted the mortgage officer and he inquired with servicing department. After 5 days I recontacted him and he reiterated he reached out to the servicing department. Three more days past and I get an email from yet another Loan Depot department-Customer Care. They claim it was sent out " on or about XX/XX/XXXX '' .. That was closing day. On or about means they are not sure. They say if XXXX County, NC tax office has not received it I should contact the mortgage servicing officer. It is like a shell game. I do not see how one collects tax money before it is due and on a non-escrow account. They have no right to hold the money and ca n't explain where it is. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I entered into an agreement to combined XXXX accounts into XXXX account. All docs were emailed and fax 'd several times. The email address and phone number to that perticular department ( combined offers ) Never get a response nor does anyone answer the phone, and the rollover feature that 's on the phone is bogus. When I called into the main number I was informed its in process, I called XXXX and XXXX to express my concern on how this is going to be reported, as I have been told a payment is not due while this is being worked on. I was told several time this will not affect your credit. XXXX they reported XXXX delinquent. This dropped my fico score XXXX points, Im guess because its mulitple accounts. i called to inform them of this. XXXX have some very unethical practices and do some things illegal. Such as call your number cell and home XXXX times a day and leave numerous messages. i have never been 30 days with this company and have paid accounts off early. but yet they call prior to the bill due and after, they have several different numbers they use, its harrassment. it is very stressful!!! its unfair to treat customers this way. I have uploaded a few pages of my credit report. Thank you 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I hired XXXX to assitmen in having negative and old information taken off of my credit report. Experian has been sent several request to remove several items and challenges to what they where reporting and they have not responded. these request have been sent to them more than 45 days ago and they continue to report false and inaccurate information. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: There was an outstanding balance owed by my ex-wife at a dentist for our children. The dentist forwarded the debt to a debt collector in XX/XX/XXXX and when I was contacted I immediately payed the debt. In XX/XX/XXXX the debt collector added a collection to my credit report for {$720.00} and refuses to remove it. I contacted the dentist office and they report they have not received the money I paid to the debt collector. Also the balance was only {$470.00} yet I paid {$610.00}. The dentist office was supposed to take care of this error but they refuse to answer my phone calls and the debt collector hangs up on me. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: Some 5 to 7 years ago I received a telephone bill from XXXX for {$370.00}. I paid the bill in full. Years later I received a collection notice that I owed XXXX {$370.00}. Not wanting to ruin my credit rating, I paid the bill AGAIN! Now I have received another collection notice from a different collection agency, stating I owe XXXX {$370.00}. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law