AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: Hello, this is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX again and I am submitting this complaint against Experian over their frivolous attempt at an investigation at my expense. They are tarnishing my creditability and my good credit by allowing a false riddled account with incomplete and incorrect information to appear on my credit file under XXXX XXXX XXXX account # XXXX ... This account is under another persons name at my business address and it does not belong to me personally and it is affecting every aspect of my financial stability. 

I work for XXXX XXXX XXXX, in the XXXX XXXX offices and I will pursue strict litigation against Experian for false reporting and responding to my initial dispute through the CFPB portal with absolutely ZERO investigative results, evidence and facts! They have not responded to my complain AT ALL though this portal. They have submitted generic and cookie cutter responses to me through this portal that make absolutely no sense. Their has been ZERO validation or investigation with XXXX XXXX XXXX on my account and they have not even verified the addresses that are displayed on this inaccurate account versus the addressed that appear legally join my credit report. 

This account is inaccurate and illegally reporting to my credit report and the investigation I received was UNLAWFUL, INSUFFICIENT and a SHAM! I have no idea what investigation was conducted, there has been ZERO proof, ZERO documentation verified and provided and NO forwarding of my documents to they furnishers illegally reporting to my credit file. This violates FCRA law, this investigation was absolutely half assed and completely unacceptable. If this item is not removed within the next week I will be sending letters for Experian to cease and desist any and all activity upon my account under FCRA law and appear in court regarding this sham of an investigation! 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I paid AMCA in XXXX or XXXX, it was settled at {$300.00} and it is still on my credit report. 

Company response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
Consumer complaint: BOA is requiring approximately 3 times the amounts due for escrow. Please provide a copy of any relevant regulation. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Received a letter thru regular post office mail dated XXXX/XXXX/16 addressed to the wrong name and about a license plate I 've never owned ; letter states " If this matter is not resolved immediately you will be commanded to appear at an administrative hearing where a determination may be made that you owe substantial additional fees and fines, registration of your vehicle being refused, and the use of your vehicle being prevented until the amounts due are paid. '' Letter states the matter has been referred to this firm ( Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson , LLP ; XXXX TX ) by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX which is continuing to record XXXX XXXX XXXX violations by a vehicle with this tag & state records say I am the vehicle owner. They do not explain how they arrived at the large amounts due for the tolls listed. 
I 've never received any toll notice from XXXX. I have driven through there infrequently and have gone online and paid minimal tolls that I have incurred, AFTER the dates of these tolls. There is an error in my name on the letter. This is not and has never been a license plate I own. The tolls are from 9 & 10 YEARS ago. 
Contacting the company resulted in the response that the file would be reviewed and a letter sent. 
I am concerned about getting a future notice to appear in court ( where I do n't live ) and improper research to determine this is not mine. Proper research would have quickly ruled out that it does n't belong here. Others online state that this company has been ruthless harassing other people, and that one tactic is to demand a court appearance and to receive a favorable decision when people do n't show up. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Citimortggae keeps losing letters of authorization .A permanent '' Letter of authorization '' onwas sent to me an I filled out it was sent back electronically and certified mail to XXXX XXXX and XXXX .This is a delay tactic.also CitiMortgage fails to answer my XXXX 2015 letter for answers on a solicitation they sent to me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Received phone call from XXXX XXXX. I did find out that this is a residence phone number. 

Guy wanted the last XXXX of my Social Security number. Would not identify himself or the supposed company for which he was trying to collect a debt. He did have my name and phone number. 

I filed a complaint with the FCC which referred me to the FTC who referred me to you. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: While reviewing my XXXX and XXXX credit report, I noticed an unauthorized and fraudulent inquiries initiated by CREDCO on XXXX/XXXX/2016. I did not authorize any employee of CREDCO to review my records for any purpose at any time. This is as a direct result of ID THEFT. I personally contacted CREDCO to delete this adverse information and requested for any verifiable signed documents by me, to date CREDCO has failed to provide me any signed documents within 5 business days nor did they delete this information from my report.. As a direct result, I have continued to suffer discrimination and irreparable economic loss of denial of meaningful employment. housing discrimination and denial of credits due laegely to gross negligence of the CREDCO employees acts and omission. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Case no. XXXX in the XXXX circuit court of appeals. This is the Tila rescission case XXXX vs XXXX XXXX, which the CFPB filed a previous amicus brief regarding statute of repose, and the three year limitation on filing rescission.As you already know, the scotus ruling on XXXX vs XXXX, did away with the falasy that a person was time barred from having not filed a law suit to enforce rescission within the three years. Attached to the XXXX case, was XXXX vs XXXX. We were reversed and remanded back to the appeals court, which remanded back to the district court, and Judge XXXX XXXX. After both parties moved for summary judgement on the issues, the ruling went like this. Summary judgement was granted to the XXXX party, because the judge believes we could not Rebutt the presumption of delivery of documents. He completely ignored the precedent sent in the eighth circuit in XXXX vs XXXX, and the ruling in XXXX, and XXXX.. He also ignored the plain language of scotus, in that rescission is " effected upon notice '', and allowed the bank the vary the statutory sequence of rescission, by not responding within 20 days. He also ignores the numerical violations in the disclosures themselves, that prove we had rescission. We are appealing his ruling of ignoring the 20 day requirement of the bank not taking action to rescind or seek judicial guidance. Ignoring this rule waves their tenable defenses. Judge XXXX treated us with hostility, at the same time was extremely polite and accommodating to the banks attorney. We feel there is a clear bias displayed here, and would like to get the CFPB 's assistance regarding the clear defiance in the eighth circuit toward Tila Rescission.While this case was playing out, the bank moved for foreclosure in the state court. We rescinded this loan in XX/XX/XXXX, and file suit in XX/XX/XXXX to enforce rescission. We have gone all the way to the Supreme Court to enforce our rights, only to be remanded back to a judge who refuses to accept rescission as a valid consumer defense. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX - XXXX accounts - is still reporting on my credit report and the accounts were opened back in 2007. I thought they were supposed to be removed after 7 years. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have come to the conclusion that the credit bureaus are violating my rights under section 1681 and that they have received the following : NOTICE OF PENDING LITIGATION SEEKING RELIEF AND MONETARY DAMAGES UNDER FCRA SECTION 616 & SECTION 617. I had previously sent my XXXX and XXXX rounds to the bureaus with no resolution, and round XXXX on XXXX/XXXX/15 and round XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. I receive the same response each time saying " verified '', and yet section 609 ( c ) states that I am allowed disclosure of the documentation used to " verify '' the accounts. They refuse to provide the documents as well as their method of verification ; the results they send state that I can request such and then they deny this. The accounts I am disputing do NOT belong to me. In addition, there are multiple addresses on my file that do not belong to me ; therefore, I am positive they belong to someone who has used my information in one way or another. I have attempted to contact each creditor and have not resolved with them either. I am going to have to resort to suing the credit bureaus. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Citibank took over an old account ( Exxon ) credit card from 1990 and said interest has grown to over XXXX they kept calling and harassing me until I changed my number. 
Citibank said I owed XXXX before I canceled the card back XXXX, now they want all the interest money and have reported me over and over again to the credit bureau. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: RS Clark located in XXXX, TX was attempting to collect a debt that I was not aware was owed to a specialty clinic. I requested to have more detailed information of proof of debt since my father has the same name as me and was wondering if it belonged to my father or myself. While evaluating the documentation they provided they did not allow enough time for me to verify the debt with the specialty clinic so I went ahead and paid twice, one payment was mailed through regular mail, RS Clark claimed they did not receive, the second attempt of payment was made electronically with that RS Clark agreed that they would not report any derogatory information to the credit bureaus. RS Clark still went ahead and filed a derogatory collection information with all three credit bureaus. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM XXXX XXXX XXXX COMPANY CLAIMING I WAS INVOLVED IN A HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT ON XXXX ACCORDING TO THE LETTER A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. I SPOKE TO THE AGENT THAT SENT THE LETTER AND THE AGENT STATED IT WAS A LETTER THAT THE POLICY HOLDER FILED A CLAIM STATING THAT A PEDESTRIAN WITNESSED THE HIT AND RUN AND GAVE MY LICENSED PLATE I ASKED SPECIFICALLY DESCRIPTION OF THE CAR AS THERE ARE XXXX CARS REGISTERED UNDER MY NAME, AGENT STATED PER THE INSURED A WHITE PATHFINDER I TOLD THE AGENT THAT NONE OF MY CARS MATCH WITH THE DESCRIPTION THAT WAS GIVEN THE AGENT INSISTED THAT MY CAR WAS INVOLVED IN THE ACCIDENT HIT AND RUN I TOLD THE AGENT THAT MY CAR DOESNT SHOWS NO SIGN THAT IT WAS INVOLVED IN ANY ACCIDENT THAT DAY AND TIME, AND THAT WAS A MISTAKE THT SOMEONE GAVE MY PLATE LICENSE NUMBER THATS ALL AND MY CAR WAS A NONOPERATION VEHICLE FROM XXXX to XXXX FOR SMOKE INSPECTION RENEWAL REGISTRATION. THIS IS A FALSE REPORT INFORMATION GIVEN, FRAUD INSURANCE THAT MUST BE REPORTED. THE AGENT THAT HARRASING ME WITH SEVERAL LETTERS, AND ACCUSSING ME WITH FALSE INFORMATION, NO INVESTIGATION WASNT MADE CORRECTLY TO FIND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS HIT AND RUN ACCIDENT, JUST BASED ON A PEDESTRIAN THAT WITNESSED AND GAVE LICENSE PLATE THAT MATCH XXXX OF MY VEHICLE, WRONG INFORMATION AND OBVIOUSLY FALSE DOCUMENTATION INVOLVING ME IN AN ACCIDENT XXXX CARS XXXX, THAT SOUNDS MORE LIKE FRAUD INSURANCE THAN ANYTHING ELSE, DONT YOU THINK IF WAS REPORTED TO POLICE THEY WILL BE SENDING ME A LETTER, OR SEND SOMEONE TO CHECK MU VEHICLE I AM VERY RESPONSABLE PERSON I DEFINITELY WOULD 'VE STOPPED IF I KNOW I HIT SOMEONE, I FILED A COMPLAINT TO FTC FOR FALSE REPORT AND INSURANCE FRAUD. BUT I RECEIVED ANOTHER LETTER NOW FROM NATIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES CREDITORS COLLECTION AGENCY FOR A SETTLEMENT OFFER AMOUNT OF {$4400.00} FROM SAME XXXX INSURANCE TO BE NEGOTIATED XXXX I DONT OWE ANY MONEY, I DO N'T THINK THATS RIGHT, TO BE HARRASING ME, ESPECIALLY WHEN I TOLD THE XXXX INSURANCE COMPANY BACK IN XXXX THAT I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT ACCIDENT. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: First off, thank you for your prompt attention to complaints.I 'm in the midst of a potential foreclosure, that i 'm trying to avoid.I 've requested a deed of lieu but was told I had to do a short sale.But any offers for my house were turned down by Bank of America, which leads me to believe they are deliberately trying to XXXX me.I 've tried calling the one number & it does'nt go through.The other number I 've used, I get no response from the csm.The house is scheduled for sheriff 's sale on XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 'm an accountant and deposited a {$4800.00} check received for Client # XXXX, I also do the accounting for Client # XXXX. Client # XXXX and Client # XXXX are competitors and completely unrelated, and up to this point unaware that I handled each others bookkeeping. I am a signer on Client # XXXX account, but not on Client # XXXX. 
The teller deposited a check made out to Client # XXXX into Client # XXXX 's account, even though the check was endorsed " for deposit only and Client # XXXX 's account number ''. When a vendor tried to cash a check and the money was not in the bank we went Online and discovered the error. We tried calling the bank for over an hour and the phone was never answered. Wells Fargo Customer Service attempted to call for over an hour and a half and never got through. Customer Service suggested I withdraw the {$4800.00} from Client # XXXX and deposit into Client # XXXX account. I refused to withdraw money from Client # XXXX because I had not made an error, the bank had simply put the money in the wrong account, and just because I was a signer on the account they put the money into did not give me the right to take money out. I was simply the carrier, my client had asked me to deposit his check into his account, the bank deposited the check into someone else 's account. 
Customer Service had me drive to the branch ( XXXX miles ) because they were unable to contact them by phone. When I arrived at the bank the head teller corrected the mistake, but then doubled the amount of the deposit. The bank manager suggested they could give me free deposit slips to compensate for the error. Here 's what I feel they did wrong : 1-Teller did not verify name on check with the account it was being deposited to. 
2-Teller did not verify account number on the back of the check with account deposited to. 
3-Branch does not answer incoming calls. 
4-Customer Service Rep unable to rectify error even though she had images of the check. 
5-Customer Service suggesting I withdraw funds from someone else 's account, that the bank had deposited to in error. 
6-Customer Service issuing a reference number while the problem was being investigated, even though she had all the facts. 
7-Client # XXXX had access to the image of the check made out to Client # XXXX violating Client # XXXX 's privacy, for he now has all the information for Client # XXXX 's account, amount of check, the vendor whom the check was from. 
8-Has violated client # XXXX privacy by suggesting I withdraw the funds and disclosing the balance in the account unrelated to the deposit. 
9-Asking the customers accountant to drive to the branch because they would not answer the phone. 
10-Caused a difficult situation between my clients and myself, for the only connection I had in this situation was being the driver of the check. By the teller automatically attaching a deposit I brought to the bank to another account that I was a signer on she linked XXXX competitors that have lost trust in our relationship. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have disputed this several times and have not received any assistance. I have spoken I I have spoken to several managers and they have admitted SPS is working on getting an updated system in order for customers to delete or change account info online. There is no way to determine whether or not payment is being submitted under the correct acct # due to system only showing last several numbers. Although they are aware of the issue they refuse to update my credit report in spite of THEIR negligence to the system in in place. I would appreciate if these late payments are removed from my c credit report 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: It is with great frustration that I am submitting this complaint. I have requested a loan modification twice with SunTrust to no success.. I am definitely not accepting their decision. They do not want me to appeal the denial. 
I feel their decision was based on incomplete or un-reviewed information. 
They have send me a list with various option indicating eligibility and ineligibility. I want my house. I am not accepting a deed in lieu. Why can they work out a plan that will allows to remain in our home. 
They have not consider the circumstance beyond my control. I was diagnosis with XXXX.. I was unemployed for a long period of time I had no other recourse than to request a work out plan from SunTrust Mortgage.. Refinancing not an option at the time. 
Our mortgage balance is more than what our home is worth. This situation cost me my job. 
Shortly after my personal life was like a turmoil.. It came down to where my wife and I separate it for a year due to this horrific situation. We have let Santrust know that thy have not helped us or done anything to help us. 

She now has returned home and contributes XXXX % to our household expenses We want to maintain our home. I really will like Sun Trust to consider my request. I have file an appeal. I have send all the documents required for a review. My wife " s income was higher for the year 2015 and will continue.. We are confident that we can take care of this mortgage as long as Sun Trust adjust my principal and interest and extended the terms of the loan. Please note that we are not looking to ignore our responsibility. Please help us out. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Is this a legitimate organization? I had to provide my social security number and address to get them to remove my name from their mailing list. Then I got a follow up mailing piece asking me to sign my confirmation to not receive any more offers from their organization. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: There are XXXX XXXX accounts that I know are past the statute of limitations, this agency is trying to advise me they will not honor my request nor remove the items. This is against the FCRA. These items have been re aged and I want removed. XXXX XXXX and XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: During an application for a car loan, I discovered that there were many errors in my Credit Reports with all XXXX credit bureaus ( XXXX ; XXXX ; and TransUnion Consumer Solutions ). I respectfully sent a request letter to them to investigate, delete, and forward me the names and phone others of all the people they contact, any documentation as well as a new Credit Report within 30 days per Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ). 

To my dismay and surprise, I have not received any documentation evidence as stated in all my XXXX letters I sent to all XXXX credit bureaus ( XXXX ; XXXX ; and TransUnion Consumer Solutions ). 
I feel it is an intentional action by these credit bureaus to gain from the errors in other peoples credit reports so that we as consumers can pay for very high interest loans as I am paying now. Per Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ) reuglations they are supposed to investigate any errors and notify me if these have been done. 
I am about to file a law suit against all the credit bureaus ( XXXX ; XXXX ; and TransUnion Consumer Solutions ) ; and before I do that I report it to XXXX. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My XXXX XXXX has not fulfilled their portion of responsibilities agreed upon in the contract. When my daughter 's XXXX was damaged, I notified them right away amd for four ( 4 ) months I continuously contacted them to see when her new XXXX would be delivered and when I could have it replaced. I do have documentation of any and all attempts of communication to recrify the situation as well as the lack thereof. They made absolutely no effort to order the XXXX in a timely fashion let alone maintain open communication regarding her replacement XXXX that has stil yet to be received. The only time this " business '' attempted to contact me was when I stopped payment on an XXXX and services I was no longer receiving due to their blatant neglect and avoidance. 

Company response: Company can't verify or dispute the facts in the complaint
Consumer complaint: Experian.com continued to bill credit card for 3 months after account was cancelled the second day after trial period and the account not accessed or used by the consumer at all during any of the time billed. Experian.com is utilizing deceptive practices to continue to bill consumers XXXX for its credit monitoring services and not cancelling the service upon request. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX was notified of my filing with local police and FTC identity theft. My account was used to obtain a fraudulent payday loan, they charged off the account for {$800.00} after dozens of calls and emails and letters. The {$800.00} is fees generated by the bank, it is NOT money that the bank paid on my behalf to this fraudulent payday loan. They tell me my disputes are frivolous and refuse to investigate. FTC CASE XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX unknown names appear on my credit report. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My Barclays XXXX XXXX was closed without any prior notice and without any reason whatsoever. When I called I was told that my heavy usage caused it to be closed. Barclays was being deceptive with their business practices in promoting a credit card with rewards and asking me to put all my spend on it to create more points and then shutting down my account with no prior notice and not allowing me to redeem my rewards. I believe that 's not the way to treat a costumer you lured in with false promises. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response