AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: While checking my personal credit report, I noticed an Employers listed as XXXX and XXXX on TransUnion credit report. I have never been employed by these companies. I am requesting that TransUnion immediately remove the unknown names of Employers listed on my credit report. My Social Security # is XXXX and my Date of Birth is XX/XX/XXXX in case it is needed to correctly identify me in their system. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been a member of Pentagon Federal Credit Union XX/XX/XXXX. I had a checking & saving account and XXXX major credit cards with excellent payment history 's. XX/XX/XXXX I checked my accountso on line and all my accounts are closed and my credit cards are charged off. I called and had several communication was different representative and they stated that my accounts were closed. They had me down on my accounts as being XXXX. I told the representative that this is a mistake on the credit union behalf. They also told me to provide them with notized document stating I ' am not dead. Okay I swallowed my pride on this situation and send them information to theread office. After about 3 weeks I may coctact with the credit union and they stated that they received my information. At that point nothing did not change. I stated to the credit union also how could you have XXXX major credit cards charge off with a XXXX balance. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: incorrect info on my report 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am requesting that TransUnion immediately update and correct the address listed on the TransUnion Credit File to read : XXXX XXXX XXXX Ct XXXX, XXXX, WA XXXX. My Social Security # is XXXX and my Date of Birth is XX/XX/1988 in case it is needed to correctly identify me in their system. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am a customer of Bank of America. I have XXXX separate credit cards. Back in XXXX I was in need of cash and was checking interest rates and fees with each of my credit cards for cash advances. I chatted with XXXX different Bank of America agents before I did the cash advances and I asked some simple questions : " What is the interest rate for a cash advance? Is there a transaction fee? What is the fee? What methods can I use to get the cash ( bank, atm, direct deposit )? 

At that time, XXXX agents I chatted with informed me that I would be a charged a very large fee of 5 % but they told me I would get a 0 % promotional interest rate until XX/XX/XXXX. Based on this information I went ahead with the XXXX cash advances totaling {$11000.00}. I was charged the 5 % fee as expected however when I got my next statements I was charged a very large amount of interest. I contacted Bank of America and the first agent denied my request to have the interest refunded. They said they needed proof that I was promised a 0 % APR that can be used at a bank or atm. I was accused of lying and was told that there was no way they told me they would give me 0 % for a cash advance. I did n't save those chat logs. 

Due to this, I did an experiment last Tuesday ( XX/XX/XXXX ) and I went online and enacted a total of XXXX chats with Bank of America through your website. The first chat I was n't provided any information and I saved the subsequent XXXX chats. Of those XXXX chats, only XXXX agent could answer my questions correctly. XXXX of the XXXX agents gave me incorrect information. XXXX of the agents informed me that I could get the 0 % APR with a cash advance through a bank teller or atm. XXXX agent told me I could get a 5 % interest rate with a {$10.00} FIXED fee. 

This was very alarming to me and I was hurt by misinformation given to me by Bank of America. I am sure many other customers have also been hurt by being given misinformation. My goal is to make sure no other customers are hurt by agents giving them incorrect information like offering a 0 % interest rate when the actual rate is 24.99 %. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Praxis Financial Solutions XXXX have promised a Trade Line deletion in exchange for payment for a Charged -Off debt purchased from XXXX XXXX Unfortunately, the payment was received but the written agreement for the deletion of this account 's " Trade Line '' and " all credit reporting that has been done on this account '' has not been honored. I have brought this concern directly to XXXX. Although my concerns were clearly documented with specifics, XXXX has rerouted my concerns ( with inaccuracy ) to a " request for XXXX to remove its credit bureau reporting due to debt being paid or settled in full with debt buyer ''. Clearly, XXXX 's summation is not the concern, and this gives the appearance that they simply do not care. These institutions have legal teams with great experience at wordplay, at times this only adds confusion to the consumer but not real solutions to problems that have negatively impacted the consumer through no fault of their own. Institutions like XXXX have no incentive to take my concern seriously. This huge oversight has negatively impacted my credit, and re-victimized my family. See previous reports from CFPB Case # XXXX ( and the attached ) where obscene language and abusive language was also reported -- not from XXXX. Using terms like " Trade Line '' deletion and " all credit reporting that has been done on this account '' are clear terms any consumer would reasonably expect to be honored. Any consumer would have been under the impression PFS XXXX received permission to enact this promise. There should not be a need for " buried in blueprint explanations '' or exemptions as to why this promise did not or does not apply. If deception was not the intent, then I simply ask for PFS to work with XXXX to " right this wrong ''. 

We are grateful CFPB supervises banks, credit unions, other financial companies, as well as enforce federal consumer financial laws. The small guy can easily become devoured had it not been for your organization 's dedication to law and fairness. 

As it now stands, XXXX has now " dinged '' my credit report, made changes to it, and has done more harm at this sensitive time. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Hello : I am contacting you with a copy of my email ( phone calls also made ) to my home loan service company XXXX Mortgage Servicing who has recently corrupted my class action law suit modified home loan agreement after taking it over from XXXX who got my loan from XXXX XXXX XXXX. My loan was modified per the settlement and up to date payment wise since XX/XX/XXXX and now suddenly this new company has altered my loan agreement by adding a self serving insurance product ( PMI ) funneling funds from my property tax escrow account set in up my loan payment agreement just for property tax. This unauthorized or advised PMI ( Property Mortgage Insurance ) product they 've added is causing a negative balance and disrupting the allocation of my online loan payments to this company and loan. I read that the practice is called loan padding and is rampant as of late even after the XX/XX/XXXX passing of the homeowners protection act. Can you please advise or assist me in seeking the right course of action as I am being run around by the company and building a negative balance even with making still my regular agreed payments. 

SincerelyXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Florida XXXX : I called in and spoke to your customer service representative XXXX XXXX a week ago as well emailed you regarding the PMI mortgage insurance just added to my loan payment which your representative confirmed was an error since it was never part of my loan agreement and was never authorized. I advised I needed this corrected as its obstructing my mortgage agreement and payments and being taken out of my property tax escrow account. I had to make my regular monthly payment for XXXX made on XXXX XXXX online using the principal and escrow tabs as the scheduled total payment tab was still reflecting the erroneous amount. Now!! It looks like the monies where incorrectly disbursed, your still showing payment due for XXXX and I see monies from my property tax being scheduled for a premium payment disbursement to the unauthorized PMI insurance!! I am making screen shots should this not be resolved and I having to contact the district attorney 's office and legal representation along with the copies of my loan agreement which has NEVER had the PMI as part of it. I need your error corrected and my XXXX payment applied as per my agreement correctly. 

Loan:XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX , Florida XXXX 

Company response: Company believes complaint represents an opportunity for improvement to better serve consumers
Consumer complaint: Current mortgage servicer took over my account mid XX/XX/XXXX. Made the XXXX XXXX payment and it was returned to me along with a letter stating they could not accept my payment because the previous servicer gave them records indicationg I had made no payments for seven months and my account was in foreclosure status. I provided documentation showing the payments were made and I was not in arrears. I have also provided documentation that my bankruptcy was discharged in XX/XX/XXXX and all payments due the mortgage company were paid by the trustee of the court. I have sent them every piece of evidence indicating payments have been made and no monthly payments were missed. Their response is that they are waiting for the previous mortgage servicer to provide them with information as to where these payments were applied. In the meantime, this whole issue hangs over my head with no resolution in sight. They have not accepted a payment from me for 5 months. I am making sure that money is kept available so I can send them what I owe them if and when the time comes. The stress is tremendous and I do n't understand why this matter is not yet resolved. I went through 5 years of a chapter XXXX bankruptcy and am trying to restore order to my financial future. These mortgage servicers are not doing enough to resolve this issue. Is there nothing that can be done to force them to get this matter straightened out. Do they have the right to just do as they please. What if I wanted to sell my house. I ca n't because of their screw ups. I need help badly as I am at my wits end. 

Company response: Company believes the complaint is the result of a misunderstanding
Consumer complaint: Ive been getting calls and they do n't leave a message. I 've had a comminication issue witg this company im the past 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Allied Interstate LLC calls me approximately XXXX times a day. These calls begin before XXXX XXXX. They also continue to call me at work, even after they have been told by my employer that this is not allowed. Sometimes they call me every XXXX minutes all day long. 

They have been notified that they are not allowed to call me with this frequency. They continue to do so. 

When I asked them for an address so that I may file a complaint against them, they would not give it to me. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I believe I was initially overcharged for my vehicle, it has since been repossessed because I lost my job & could no longer afford the payments.. The vehicle in question is a XXXX ... At the time I signed the contract on the vehicle I was desperate & really needed transportation for work, school & to take my kids to & from school ... I really believe the cost of the vehicle was over priced at {$8000.00} with interest the total came to {$12000.00} approximately.. The value of this car at that time I bought it was no more than {$1300.00}, current value approximately {$1000.00} Since the vehicle has been repossessed I have attempted to reach out to Drive Time multiple times with no success to discuss this matter. I just continue to get transferred around & told no one can help me or I 'm directed to call someone else.. I recently received I letter stating the vehicle was sold and I owe {$9700.00} for a vehicle that is only worth {$1000.00} per XXXX XXXX ... At {$160.00} biweekly payments I made for 7 months approximate cost out of my pocket {$2300.00}. I really feel this company has inflated the cost of the vehicle and are attempting to get XXXX times the amount for this vehicle from me & also from whoever they sold the vehicle to. I really feel I have been taken advantage of me as consumer ... I feel that without help from someone they will not sit down to discuss fair compensation I should pay for this vehicle, now that its no longer in my possession.. Can you please assist me with resolving this matter.. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had a car loan with Condor Capital Corp since 2012. Occasionally I paid my loan late but I was never late more than one month. By court order Condor Capital has been dissolved and my loan ended up in hands of ... That the problem. I do n't know who my current lender is. Condor 's website redirects me to blank, generic log in info. When I log in with my previous credentials I see my personal information but under account information there always is message : '' No accounts available to view ''. 
I repeatedly send emails to contact info and made multiple phone calls ( XXXX ) always answered by voicemail. Except XXXX generic response via email, none of my request was answered, including multiple requests for payoff statement. I mailed XXXX payment to XXXX XXXX XXXX under " Contact Us '' info ( XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX ). My check was cashed within 4 days of mailing form XXXX. There was no endorsement on the back and still no response regarding any statement, balance, account information. 
I really do n't know what to do at this point. I have no problem with paying for my car but since Condor Capital was shut down for defrauding its customers, I refuse to make any further payments without being able to oversee that the payments are being applied correctly and my balance is where it should after 3 years of payments. 
I would really appreciate your advice and help in this matter. 

Company response: Company believes complaint caused principally by actions of third party outside the control or direction of the company
Consumer complaint: There was a hard inquiry on my transunion credit report that I did not authorize. It is from in XXXX XXXX, FL. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Filed an erroneous collection tradeline # XXXX to my credit report for original creditor XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have never held an account with XXXX XXXX XXXX and have never had any association with the service address in XXXX XXXX, FL, for which the collection was filed. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I am currently being harassed by email from XXXX loan companies. CashCallXXXX. They are threatening to sue/ garnish my check. I only applied for a loan with CashCall, paid the loan. Then CashCall said I still owe them XXXX dollars. I filed a complaint, they said they wrote it off on my credit report. These orther XXXX I have never applied for a loan nor have I received anything from them. I tried emailing them letting them know these are fraudulent, but no reply. Next I tried calling them at these numbers ( XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX not reachable. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME. Thanks! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I am in receipt of a collection notice from an entity identified only as " ERC '', claiming that I owe USD {$1200.00} to XXXX XXXX XXXX. The notice indicates that, if I return unspecified " equipment '' to XXXX, the return XXXX be used to calculate an unspecified amount of credit toward the debt owed. 

I have never in my adult life -- or even in childhood -- lived in any area served by XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have neither requested nor received any goods or services ( including unspecified " equipment '' ) from XXXX. I have never been nor applied to be a customer of XXXX and I have never used, received, owned, leased, or otherwise knowingly or unknowingly made use of any XXXX services ; including, but not limited to any form of television, Internet or voice service. 

The entity identified as " ERC '' most probably corresponds to this credit enquiry ( information provided by XXXX ) : ENHANCED RECOVERYXXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX On:XXXXThe notice has a return address of XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX, but advises that written communication should be sent only to ERC, XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX. 

Being in receipt of my credit report, both XXXX and ERC are or should be fully aware that I have never lived in any area where I could have received any services that XXXX is commonly known to provide. 

I can only conclude that, barring gross negligence, XXXX and/or ERC are knowingly engaging in fraudulent debt collection practices. The notice also states that they may knowingly make false statements to national or other credit bureaus representing that I owe a debt to them ; presumably if I do not promptly pay ERC the sum claimed to be owed. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I applied for assistance after falling behind on my mortgage due to unemployment. I have hired an attorney to help me with the process. The attorney 's in house underwriter states I qualify for a regular XXXX modification. Bank of America now states I do not qualify for a regular modification due to XXXX / Investor non-approval. I have not received any denial letters or explanations. We believe there may be an error in some of the information the investor is using to make this determination such as the value of the property or similar. Bank of America has also started foreclosure by filing a Notice of Default on XXXX XXXX, 2015. They did not review me in a timely manner that last time I applied for assistance. They stalled and took 76 days to review me. This is after they filed the Notice of Default against me, thereby burning all of my time waiting for them. Per my attorney, this is wrong and I believe illegal as it violates Respa Reg X- Regarding timelines for reviewing someone for foreclosure assistance, especially after a Notice of Default is filed. I am told they were supposed to review me within 30 days of having a complete package. They received my complete financial package on XXXX XXXX, 2015. My attorney confirmed they received the package and that it was complete on XXXX XXXX, 2015. However, they did not make a decision until XXXX XXXX, 2015. I have attached notes from my attorney 's calls to the lender. You can see they did not review me in a timely manner. It feels like they stalled on purpose and then intentionally denied me solely to reach the 90 day mark where they can now set a sale date and I have run out of time to save my house. They give no reason for the denial and now they have burned all my time to be able to correct what ever errors they made while reviewing me to save my home. I am told by my attorney that the timelines set by RESPA Reg x to review someone for loss mitigation assistance within 30 days of submitting a complete financial package were set up this way because lenders were stalling and then just setting sale dates. I fear this is my case. Bank of America seems to have burned two and a half months sitting on my application. This is after foreclosure was started and my timeline to a sale date is also running out. They are not not giving me the reason for my denial and as of XXXX XXXX, they can now set a sale date leaving me no time to figure out how to save my home. Attached you will find notes from my attorney 's office proving Bank of America sat on my loan modification request and has burned my time since my Notice of Default putting me into a bad situation now facing a Notice of Sale. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: This debt reported by Credit Protection Association is not a valid debt. I submitted a letter to their company on XXXX XXXX, 2015 requesting that I be sent several specific documents that prove I owe this debt. Credit Protection Association did not respond to my request. I have attached a copy of the letter. 

In addition, this debt is over 7 years old and can no longer be reported to the credit bureaus according to the Fair Credit Reporting Law. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I have like XXXX or XXXX credit cards on my credit report that when I applied the terms where unclear so I cut them up and never used them now they are trying to use up front fee 's as a balance that I owe even thou as soon as I received the cards I called them and canceled them and never used them for instance a XXXX card that when I received they had already charged the card XXXX for processing fees I canceled them as soon as I got them and read the terms now they are adding interest and making derogatory marks on my credit 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Their is a address listed on my credit report that I never lived at 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have been making payments with an external checking account through the issuer 's website or third-party bill pay service to my credit card. Unknown to me, I was not able to make payments after I opened a checking account with the issuer, which there was no sign or warning that the service has been redesigned. I ended up calling the issuer to make a phone payment, which was considered late due to time zone difference. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION advises today, XXXX XXXX, 2015 ( email attached from XXXX XXXX ) that " the foreclosure is properly processed.. '' CONTRADICTING its purported boss XXXX 's statement made TODAY within CFPB saying : " Please be advised that at this time, we are reviewing the foreclosure process to verify no error occurred. The new expected date of resolution is XXXX XXXX, 2015. " IS IT LAWFUL THEN FOR QUALITY TO PROCEED WITH THE TRUSTEE SALE OF OUR HOME ON XXXX XXXX, 2015 PENDING THIS REVIEW by XXXX - for XXXX 's resolution on XXXX XXXX, 2015? 

Thank you, CFPB for your urgent help! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I recently applied for and received a Barclay credit card. I have been using the card and paying, never late with any issues. This card currently has a XXXX balance. I was shopping for a new computer and happened to be on the XXXX website. I decided to apply for credit to complete my purchase, my application was declined. A few days later, I received a letter in the mail from Barclay card stating they we 're unable to approve my application due to a past charged off account, they also informed me that they did n't run my credit to make this decision. I feel that they extended credit previously with the open credit card I have and that they made an error by denying me credit without reviewing my current credit history, instead they judged me on something from almost 10 years ago. This in an unfair denial of credit from this company. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response