AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: There is a foreclosure sale scheduled for a loan held by Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. My company owns the property in California which is collateral for the deed of trust. On XXXX XXXX, 2016, I contacted WFHM and requested reinstatement figures per CA Civil Code section XXXX, we are an " entitled party '' by being a successor trustor through foreclosure. The fax documents were sent to WFHM per instructions received from a representative and subsequent calls have been made as well to no avail. 
XXXX XXXX 2016 - Call to XXXX # XXXX he informed me the fax had not been processed yet. and to call back. 
XXXX XXXX 2016 - Called again spoke with XXXX # XXXX - She told me processing time could be two weeks and to try back again. 
XXXX XXXX 2016 - Called again, spoke with XXXX XXXX # XXXX, he said to try back on Friday XXXX XXXX to see if the request was processed. 
XXXX XXXX 2016 - Called again and asked about the reinstatement numbers to stop the foreclosure sale. Spoke with XXXX in BK dept. She said she did n't see the fax was ever received and gave me # XXXX to re-send it to. I did. 
XXXX XXXX 2016, Called spoke with XXXX in collection dept. She said the fax was received and had not been processed by any dept. I thanked her and asked her to let me know who could look at the package and issue figures to stop the foreclosure. She did n't know who could do the processing. 
This leads me to this website to file a formal complaint against WFHM for not issuing reinstatement figures against CA Civil code. We are a successor in interest to this deed of trust and I demand a viable method of reinstating the mortgage which encumbers the Real Property lawfully owned by my employer in California. Please help. 

Loan # XXXX Property : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX CA XXXX Borrower : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX . 
Last XXXX : XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had my loan with country wide bank of America took it over everything was fine until I feel on some hard times last year. There collections department called and I was able to set up a repayment plan to get caught up but then even while I was making all my payments on the time table they set up for me every few days they would call me and tell me my home was going into foreclosure and I side I 'm making all my payments on time that they had set up. They then told me that until I made the last payment they had the right to call me any time they wanted. I got everything caught up last month I made my payment early this month I am a little tight but will have it payed before any late fees go on it which is how I paid it for years and they never called or complained about it now they have there collections department calling me way before the grace period is up I still have 11 days in the grace period. I filed a complaint at the bank when the issue with the harassment during the repayment and got no results. I have always paid extra on my loan and did even on the repayment plan and every month since I do not think I need to be harassed before I am out side the grace period. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Pinnacle Credit Services is repeatedly calling my mother-in-law, threatening that I am going to jail. I have never received verification or validation that this debt belongs to me. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Citi credit card customer for 4 years. Pristine record until the day I switched my banking relationship and forgot to update the auto-pay info with Citi and was charged {$31.00} on a {$31.00} account balance. Customer service was horrible. In fact, horrible is an understatement which led me to close the account. ( {$22000.00} credit limit ) and an existing brokerage, IRA relationship totaling {$600000.00}. Yep that 's right for {$32.00}. Never again will I do business with Citi, especially that the level of customer service has taken a nose dive from where it was. Poor command of XXXX, the person sounded like she wanted to get rid of me, transferred me 2 times to the wrong person and seemed to care less if the issue was solved. Great job Citibank!. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: XXXX is reporting to XXXX and Experian as current 120 and 180 days delq for an account that was charged off in XX/XX/2009 for both of us- XXXX and XXXX XXXX . XXXX XXXX has already removed the derogatory item all together. XXXX is dropping our credit scores by XXXX points based on these consistent lates for years. We demand they fix their reporting right away. We have complete XXXX rounds of dispute letters to both XXXX and Experian and have attempted several CFPB complaints and to date we still have not received any assistance or resolution. We demand CFPB steps in and gets this fixed right away. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I 've submitted multiple disputes to Experian in regards to collection accounts that XXXX XXXX XXXX has inserted into my credit report as credit tradelines. I provided documentation to Experian on different occasions and each time the accounts come back verified. I supplied Experian a copy of their own documentation showing how a collection account should be reported and they still have not deleted the inaccurate information. XXXX purchased delinquent charged off credits cards and are now misrepresenting themselves as a Debt buyer and my original creditors which they are not. I have no other option but to file a complaint with the CFPB and the XXXX Carolina Attorney General office. 

These accounts are reporting with payment history whereas there is no provision under the collections segment of a consumer credit file for debt collectors to report payment history profile dates and items. 

These accounts are reporting payment terms as well. Again information that should not be reported by a collection agency. 

A party who purchases a debt that is in default for the sole purpose of collecting the debt is not a creditor, FDCPA 803 ( 4 ). This reporting is frivolous and inaccurate. 

Documentation attached. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: After several unexpected medical bills, and with no living family to turn to, I was forced to search for a quick way to pay bills in advance of my regular paycheck. I found Green Trust Cash after a frenzied google search and the agent I spoke to was friendly and understanding, if hurried and pressuring me to see the benefits of having cash now. Agreeing, I accepted the terms of the loan, not understanding the incredible interest rates or the way that I would not be able to increase my payment schedule/pay the principal down quickly -- - although the agent I spoke to assured me that repayment was easy. I received the {$300.00}, less {$25.00} in wire transfer fees, and the schedule for repayment began. As per the loan agreement, I paid {$720.00} over the course of 3.5 months, more than 200 % of the loan. However, with the clear of day, I have come to understand that they are attempting to charge me 751.07 % ( or a total of {$1400.00} ) for a loan of {$300.00}. I was unable to keep up with their punishing 'repayment ' schedule, that actually kept the principle very high, so as to keep me paying for as long as possible ( more than 1 year ). I closed the bank account they were aware of in order to get some breathing room ( after being charged late fees/overdraft fees ). Then, before I was able to contact the lender about finding a schedule that would fit within my state 's legal repayment/interest laws, Green Trust Cash began to badger and call incessantly. Some times as often as 4 times a day, on my personal and work phone numbers. Having a diagnosed XXXX, I have been thus far unable to answer their abusive emails, voice mail messages or calls. I am in over my head and in need of help. Please do not trust this company. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Today I logged into my XXXX account only to find out it showed a {$6400.00} credit line ( with a {$0.00} balance ) from Kay Jewelers had been closed TODAY ( XXXX/XXXX/2016 ). 

I have not received any correspondence whatsoever in regards to my card ( aside from just having received a brand new card in the mail ) and as far as I am concerned my account was in very good standing. 

Upon reaching out, I was advised that they have a standard policy of deactivating accounts that have not been used in a certain amount of time. Now this is complete, absolute and utter XXXX -- they do n't reach out to the consumer, send a letter advising that this is about to happen or anything -- they just simply close down a credit account that has been active and in good standing for 3 or 4+ years. 

Nobody from Kay was in any position to help me whatsoever or help fix the issue, and now they 've not only lost a customer for life but they went ahead and shut down a {$6400.00} credit line that I had every intention of continuing to use. 

It is absolutely heinous to me that they have absolutely no requirement or responsibility to the cardholder to advise them of something they will be doing that can so negatively impact their credit reports. Moreover, the complete apathy from Kay staff was disgusting. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: on XX/XX/XXXX I disputed the account the account with hunter warfield on the grounds that the company has failed to notify me prior to reporting to the beauru. according to the FCRA the reporting agency has a responsibility to have a process to investigate not only the companies response buy mine as well. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I had applied for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX More Credit card from Citibank and the same got approved on XXXX XXXX, 2015. The card has an annual fee of {$95.00} and it has an offer related to refund of up to {$650.00} incurred towards purchase of new cellphone from XXXX XXXX XXXX after consumer spends {$2000.00} within 3 months. I purchased an XXXX XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX for {$740.00} at XXXX XXXX, Ohio on XXXX XXXX, 2015. I promptly faxed the receipt to Citibank Customer care ( Fax No XXXX ) around XXXX XXXX, 2015. The same had been acknowledged by Customer care as well as XXXX XXXX, Executive Response Unit from Citi Bank. I met the purchase target of {$2000.00} within 2 months instead of stipulated 3 months. However, I am yet to receive my refund of {$650.00} from citi bank. Every follow up is met with standard reply that it will take effect in next billing cycle. Today, I have been informed by citibank that they do not have the Fax copy of my receipt and would like me to send it back in order to avail the offer. I feel I have been cheated by the fraudulent advertisements of citibank and Citibank is intentionally misplacing documents to avoid paying the refund amount of {$650.00}. Please initiate suitable action against citi bank for fraudulent activities. Please find a similar CPFB case logged earlier for the same card ( Case # XXXX ). XXXX XXXX XXXX from CitiBank had called up and expressed false intent to resolve the issue. However, subsequent calls barring one customarily lands up on her voicemail which she never cares to return back. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On my Experian account there is a company reporting a collections account. I have filed a dispute with Experian and all they did was send a notice to the collection agency and did not ask the collection agency ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) if they had documented legal proof that I owe this debt. I visited the office of this collection agency ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) in XXXX, AZ. and they could not provide any documentation of any form. I sent them a registered letter requesting such information and I also contacted the physical therapy office and they could not provide any proof either, nor have they called me with any status regarding the claimed debt as they promised. I advised Experian and asked them why they did not require documented proof from the collection agency and they responded that the business can report to them any information that they want. I asked if they require the reporting business to have or provide any type of legal documentation indicating that the person that they are reporting negative information on their credit report, they indicated that no basically the reporting company can report whatever they want and Experian in their dispute process will only ask them if they want to continue reporting the information, whether or not they have any legal grounds to do so. 
My complaint is that the credit reporting agency in their dispute should require that the reporting client of Experian should be able to provide legal documentation regarding the information that they are reporting, especially in this electronic age where the information could easily be provided. And if the creditor or collection agency can not provide such documentation then it must be removed. 
If this agency had any legal documented proof they would have filed legal action against me long ago, as I have lived at the same address for over 24 yrs. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I filed bankruptcy and XXXX XXXX was left on my credit report an I had no balance and it lowered my score 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I paid my loan on XXXX XXXX and it 's still showing up negative when I actually paid up until XX/XX/XXXX 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I have sent several letters asking them about this debt and they refuse to send me anything. I continue call XXXX and inform them that I do not owe them any debt to them inwhich they showed that I do not own any debt. This company IC Systems continue to report this collection on my Credit Reports. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I attempted to order a new card with Continental Finance, the card I have is damaged, there is a crack on the bar code and will not scan correctly due to it. I have to use the card online, it will not work in any terminal. The rep I spoke with stated my account needs to be current, which it is, it is not past due. She would not order a new card. I am not due until the XXXX, the account is current, not past due. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I was making regular payments. In XXXX XXXX I was XXXX in the Michigan XXXX. The finance company knew this but continued to harass my parents. 
I was released XXXX XXXX, XXXX. I got my Social Security XXXX reinstated and started making payments XXXX XXXX, XXXX. I have been making, and plan on continuing to make regular payments until it is paid off. 
I have been regularly checking my credit score and have noticed that the balance is still at {$19000.00}. I called Ditech to inquire as to why my payments are not being reported. I was told that they do n't report payments until the outstanding balance is paid in full. At {$300.00} a month, that will take about 6 years. It will state on my credit report that I still owe {$19000.00}. 
If I am making regular payments, then they should be reported to the credit bureaus. They are quick to report if you DO N'T make a payment. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: This is in reference to my ongoing dispute with bank of America case number XXXX. A resolution specialist named XXXX left me a voicemail to return her call. On XX/XX/2016, I left her XXXX voicemails before she returned my call. She said she will " INVESTIGATE '' and she will call me back on XX/XX/2016 which she never did. During the conversation, I asked her for written correspondence instead for her " findings '' and SHE REFUSED. She refused to mail, email or fax as a form of correspondence, she said she will call, maybe to avoid incriminating herself in writing. She attached a document, a letter dated XX/XX/2016 a letter which was supposedly have been mailed to me which I have never received. Today is XX/XX/2016, and I presume that letter was written and attached to my ongoing case for the sole purpose of showing she " responded ''. 

Company response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage continues to use the United States Postal Service to mail fraudulent statements to me, claiming I owe them over {$200000.00}. I never contracted with Wells Fargo Home Mortgage. They continue demanding unsubstantiated amounts, usually in the range of thousands of dollars at a time. I have written many times asking for verification of this alleged debt and have not received proof they are the holder in due course. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Hello I found an open collection account listed on a recent Credit Report which i obtained using XXXX and XXXX XXXX. I attempted to research the company, Enhanced Recovery ( ERC ) using XXXX. I found that this company does not have a website, which raised my eyebrows about the legitimacy of this collection. I called the original creditor ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) to find out more. XXXX XXXX has NO RECORD of my name or social security number in their system. They told me to try to find a number for the Collection agency so I called the number on my report. The person who spoke with me did not inform me that I could dispute this debt, that I had any right what so ever to challenge the facts of the debt. I asked for him to send me a letter to verify the facts of the debt. They ended up sending me a " summary of the payment agreement. '' I can assure you I did not agree to pay them anything, especially when I had no information about why they had this debt and did not share with me my rights. Then they somehow assumed I had agreed to pay them in full without those words ever coming from my mouth. 
I Believe this is deceptive and illegal and furthermore, an immoral practice, especially coming from a company that is doing its best to hide their identity by not having a website or any contact information readily available to the public. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Today I received in the U.S. Mail a letter dated " XXXX/XXXX/XXXX '' from " XXXX '' with a copy of my " XXXX '' credit report. Under the " Adverse Account '' section, there is only 1 false/Identity Theft listing. It is from a debt collection agency called " Enhanced Recovery Company , LLC. " ; XXXX. XXXX XXXX ; XXXX, FL ; XXXX ; ( XXXX ) XXXX. It claims that I owe " XXXX XXXX. $ XXXX. '' I have NEVER used " XXXX '' I 've had " XXXX '' for the last 22 consecutive years. I am a victim of Identity Theft. And this is the exact same company that unlawfully posted the exact same adverse information on all XXXX of the major credit bureaus ( i.e., XXXX, XXXX, & XXXX ) around XXXX of XXXX before being ordered by the same XXXX credit bureaus to " Delete '' this intentional false/Identity Theft " XXXX '' debt scam that this company has been allegedly running. When I called their toll free phone number, their company 's rude telephone operator just told me " ... just pay the $ XXXX, fool! ... '' 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: Aqua finance, financial systems of greenbay and there investors are increasing there harassment again. We are a little behind in our mortgage and I guess they think this a opportunity to incorporate there extreme harassment tactics. Since Monday were having problems with our cable service, we 're having major telephone harassment, on yesterday XXXX/XXXX/15 a truck driver driving a semi acted like he was going to run me over and yes he was looking directly at me! The harassment intensified on Monday and is still continuing. There trying to intimidate us into not paying our mortgage there by going into foreclosure and ultimately loosing our home. That was there goal from the beginning and in my opinion AQUA Selling us that defective equipment was a set up from the very beginning! We 're constantly reading various stories on AQUA 'S rip off and complaint web site that show that AQUA is using the same harassment tactics against people all over the U.S. Whenever I case ends up in court, we will reach out to as many of AQUA 'S victims as we can to testify. We will also get as much media as we can involved! We are n't abandoning our house and we wo n't be intimidated! 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law