AdiOO7/consumer_complaints huggingface dataset:
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX inaccurately furnished information to collecting agencies regarding an alleged debt owned by them, when this was in fact misleading and inaccurate and known to be misleading and inaccurate. 

I requested a validation of the alleged debt XXXX XXXX XXXX claimed is owed but never received such validation. 

1. I have attempted to contact XXXX / Experian multiple times for them to rectify this mistake but none have done so. 

2. I believe that their conduct violated the RFDCPA and FDCPA in multiple ways, including but not limited to:3. I have contacted Experian via certified mail and they have done nothing at all and continue to report this collections item on my credit report. 




The credit report provided by experian have been and continue to be disseminated to various persons and credit grantors, both known and unknown. 

XXXX And Experian damaged, and continues to be damaged, in the following ways : a. Denial of credit by at least one lender ; b. Emotional distress and mental anguish associated with having incorrect derogatory personal information transmitted about Plaintiff to other people both known and unknown ; andc. Decreased credit score which may result in inability to obtain credit on future attempts. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Civil judgement was vacated. Case was dismissed without prejudice. Forwarded copy of the order from the court to transunion via fax on XXXX/XXXX/2015. On XXXX/XXXX/2015 their " investigation '' was closed and the item was " verified as accurate '' which is impossible, because it is incorrect. After spending several hours on the phone today being transferred and disconnected over and over again, it is clear that they have no intention of fixing this error. They claim to have never received my document and asked me to fax it again. When I asked them to verify receipt of the fax, they said that they could not. 

This is a never ending cycle of incompetence coupled with the inability to easily communicate with anyone due to the language barrier of the operators. I speak English. My initial call, I was transferred to a supervisor and disconnected. The second call I was transferred 3 times to XXXX different supervisors, then disconnected while being transferred to the XXXX. The XXXX call, I was disconnected by the first operator while he was attempting to transfer me. 

This is not a matter of he said/she said. It is indisputable fact that no one is arguing except for transunion. The court will confirm that the judgement was vacated and the case has been dismissed. The original plaintiff will confirm that the judgement has been vacated and the case has been dismissed. I have hard evidence proving that the judgement was vacated. Transunion just really wants to keep this on my report for no apparent reason. 

They categorically refuse to remove it. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Reference dispute XXXX ] also. I spent over an hour on the phone with transunion, requesting access to my report online, so as to be able to dispute any negative credit information. I was sent to several reps and to no less than XXXX different websites. Nothing Absolutely nothing got accomplished. These people are responsible for critical information that effect humans lives. How is it that XXXX can covey this information to the public and they can not. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I filed bankruptcy a few years back and when I did my lawyer didn'treaffirm my mortgage. I never knew this until I tried to refinance. 
Things changed in my life and I could no longer afford XXXX amonth. I have asked over and over with my mortgage company tohelp me to just lower the payments. I do not want to loose my housebut I am now a month behind on my payments. With the mortgagenot being reaffirmed, none of my payments show on my credit. I'mnot trying to get out of paying I just need lower payments. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I am disputing the following hard inquiries on all my credit reports to include transunion, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX TransUnionXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXXI did voluntarily submit my info to XXXX for refinancing my XXXX chevy chevy cruz. I did not authorize any others above other than XXXX XXXX. Ialso am disputing all hard inquiries on all my credit reports with all bureaus with the exception of XXXX. that was my auto loan. I do want to dispute whyXXXX XXXX XXXX is on there more there more than once? Please look into thisas I do not know or have not authorized places like XXXX XXXX, XXXX, etc to pull my credit. Me and my wife had to amend ourtaxes for tax year XXXX due to identity theft. I am a XXXX of this countryand would like to see these stricken from my record. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I received a letter from Commonwealth Financial Systems stating that I owed money to : XXXX XXXX XXXX Services in the amount of XXXX. The letter stated that they had purchased the account and if I considered the debt valid they requested payment. They further stated that if I failed to let them know in 30 days that I disputed the validity of the debt they would consider the debt valid. They also called to request payment and asked for last XXXX digits of my SSN. I told them I do not give out information on the phone. They have a spot on the letter for you to fill out your credit card information and offer XXXX automated payment. They push hard for payment and are hoping you just pay it right away without taking the time to research it. Obviously, XXXX XXXX XXXX is not a real company and the debt was not owed but they sure make you feel like it is. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX has reported a current bankruptcy on my credit report. I filed bankruptcy in XXXX of 2003. It was a Chapter XXXX and should have been cleared from our credit history after XXXX years. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XX/XX/XXXX citicards pulled my credit report and approved me for a credit limit increase on my credit card from XXXX to XXXX. There was negative information on my credit report at the time ( a bankruptcy filed XX/XX/XXXX ), however, my credit limit increase was approved. Since that increase in XX/XX/XXXX I have used my account in accordance with the terms & conditions, however, I am now being turned down for increases because of my bankruptcy on my credit report. 
With this in mind I feel unfairly discriminated against. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Our firm, XXXX XXXX, has been monitoring our client 's request for mortgage assistance with Wells Fargo ( " WF '' ) to ensure WF 's compliance with Regulation X. For several months, our client has been actively trying to get her application reviewed in order to begin paying her mortgage and save her home. However, WF has failed to act diligently and continues to send our client letters with inaccurate statements claiming documents are still missing despite having provided all documents requested. Our client submitted her application for mortgage assistance to WF on XXXX XXXX, 2015 by certified mail, which was received on XXXX XXXX, 2015. On XXXX XXXX, WF sent a letter to our firm requesting a list of additional documents needed to complete the review. Our client supplied all documents from the list that existed on XXXX XXXX. 
On XXXX XXXX, WF acknowledged receipt of those documents however did not state whether anything additional was required. As suggested on WF 's correspondence, we checked the status of the modification review on WF 's online portal on XXXX XXXX. The website showed that the documents step of the review process was complete and the application was being reviewed. But then, WF sent XXXX different letters dated XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX stating the application was not complete and more documents were needed. We submitted a Notice of Error to WF detailing the inconsistent information we were receiving in our efforts to request mortgage assistance for our client. 
Again, our client submitted all the documentation she had in an effort to finally get her application properly reviewed. WF 's response to our Notice of Error dated XXXX XXXX failed to adequately address the issue we raised and instead just stated the application was being reviewed and to contact WF via telephone if we wanted more information. The letter did not address whether any documents were still missing or the actual status of the borrower 's application even though we sent WF several requests for information specifically asking for the status of the borrower 's application and what documents, if any, were missing for their review. Since we received no meaningful response from WF, the borrower believed the application was complete and being reviewed as their stated and the website portal showed. 
WF sent our firm XXXX separate letters both dated XXXX XXXX, only 8 days after their response stating the application was being reviewed. XXXX letter acknowledged receipt of additional documents that were sent in and stated they were being reviewed. The other stated the Borrower was being denied mortgage assistance because the application was pending for too long. WF has not sent the borrower any indication that additional documents were needed since the XXXX XXXX letter, which the borrower complied with. To date, we have submitted XXXX Notices of Error to WF and still have yet to receive a proper review for our client 's request for mortgage assistance. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My home have a sale date XX/XX/XXXX. Please help me to keep my home. I lost my job XX/XX/XXXX due to XXXX XXXX, I 'm XXXX years old. I am now working again since XX/XX/XXXX. Keep Your Home California has agreed to pay the back payments, but Wells Fargo Bank is refusing to accept the funds. I make enough money to pay my mortgage from now on. I ca n't get an answer from Wells Fargo on why they are refusing help from Keep Your Home California. I am still waiting on a call back. Please contact and request an answer for me. Keep Your Home California counselors says they will pay back payments owed up to {$25000.00} but Wells Fargo would have to accept. Thank You very much. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In XXXX 2015, I had settled a debt with XXXX XXXX for an amount less than what was originally asked. This amount was agreed to, and I was given a confirmation over the phone, as well as a receipt over email. However, recently I noticed that a derogatory entry was made on my credit report for the difference between the original debt and what was agreed to in settlement. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: On XXXX XXXX I had a lump sum {$1000.00} taken from my checking account from Machol & Johanas LLC. I was never notified of a judgment entered against me in XX/XX/XXXX for a balance of {$2000.00} that was owed to the University XXXX XXXX After being left without a dime in my account I was advised that I owed them {$11000.00} and that unless i entered into a payment plan wiht them they would continue to withdraw my funds. When I asked them what all of this was about and how I was i never notified, i was forwarded a letter that they claimed was served to me in XX/XX/XXXX at an address that I no longer resided at. She did not care simply said that they did have record that the notice was served. So now i dont know what to do ... Im a single mother paying this company {$100.00} a month for a balance that isnt even on my credit report. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: In XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX did a construction job for XXXX XXXX XXXX. Because, they did not pay there unemployment taxes and XXXX XXXX owner of XXXX XXXX was my husband at that time and signed a contract with XXXX XXXX the unemployment taxes was in his company name. Because Texas is a community property state and both of us had closed accounts they reopen my account and put the unemployed taxes on my account and put a freeze on my bank account and it was sent to the Credit Bureaus. I have manage to get it taken off XXXX and XXXX. But, I ca n't get it off XXXX. I faxed them the same documentation almost XXXX months ago, they sent me out another report but not the dispute for the for the taxes. I called and the representative found the faxed documentation but they had not investigated it. I asked her if she wanted me to upload more documentation and she said no. I told her that I had received documentation from IRS, because I did the Injury spouse form and she told me that they did not need anymore documentation. The reason why XXXX put the unpaid taxes on my account is because when they sent the results of the hearing they put on the top of the letter XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX d/b/a XXXX XXXX, but XXXX started XXXX in XXXX, we was not married at that time. His assume name is in XXXX XXXX d/b/a as XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX took full responsibility for the taxes not XXXX XXXX. Why would I call for a hearing knowing that this was a XXXX XXXX. We was not married when he start his business, we were married in XX/XX/XXXX. But it was put on my credit file as a Individual not Joint. If you look at the account number, they are totally different and if they really investigate they would know that, XXXX XXXX Assume name was acquired in XX/XX/XXXX or XX/XX/XXXX. My assume name was acquired in XX/XX/XXXX I am going back to college but because of this I ca n't get a private student loan. If Texas was following there own rules and the Federal government XXXX XXXX is not responsible, he only paid the employees wages, he did not paid for the material or equipment, and the other company told them where and what time to be at work. By the Sub-Contractors laws State and Federal, XXXX XXXX is responsible for the wages. and this was a Federal Contracting Job. But, one of the representative from the XXXX told XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX how to avoid paying the social and medicare taxes. The third party ( XXXX XXXX ) did not even call in. I have all of my documentations, plus XXXX has them. You can contact me at XXXX, email address : XXXXXXXXXXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Factor Trust Credit Report Agency, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, GA XXXX, had release FALSE information to XXXX potential lenders companies ; consequently, my application for a loan were denied. Factor Trust stated I am employed by XXXX, unknown to me. Also, Factor Trust released FALSE information obtained from XXXX which contains FALSE information including address and phone numbers, and information that are more than 7 years old and not longer are required to be released to others because of the Statue of Limitations. I have faxed all these FALSE information directly to Factor Trust for a prompt remedy since Factor Trust had injured my rights to obtain credit. Other False information released by Factor Trust is from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX which are inaccurate. As long Factor Trust continues releasing FAlse information regarding my credit, I believe, FIRMLY, that Factor Trust SHOULD NOT be permitted to conduct this type of business. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: My husband and I have been separated since XX/XX/XXXX. He is XXXX ( XXXX ) and goes through XXXX of running credit to see who qualifies him for a loan and when he gets qualified he acts like he won the lottery. He has been doing this since our separation. Now that his credit is maxed out and is no longer getting approved for loans he has gone to the extent as putting me on as the co-signer without me knowing. This happened two weeks ago XX/XX/XXXX with USAA. He ran an online application for a loan with USAA since he did n't qualify for the {$10000.00} loan he dishonestly put my social security number as a co signer. He got approved for the loan. USAA, very well known bank/insurance for military -- well they, never contacted me to inform or verify with me that there was a loan being processed under my name and I was the co applicant. I only got an email after the fact saying congratulations your loan has been finalized call us immediately if you did not apply. Well I have gotten nowhere with USAA. I placed a police report sent them everything possible to prove to them that I did not apply. I am trying to deal with this along with finding a full time job, take care of my child and get this marriage over and done with. I hope banks and credit companies understand that this is a serious issue. Just because one is married does n't mean one spouse has the right to run your credit without my knowledge, companies should VERIFY with applicants AND CO APPLICANTS. Apparently, he applied on line he e-signed everything and USAA never verified. Everytime I call USAA my account is locked for investigation " we can not open your account '' all the agents tell me I will get called 24-48 hours from today. This has been going on for two weeks now. I will never trust military banking for anything especially this one. It is used by many military and overseas as well and I am left to just wait .... 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: I was called back in XXXX about a debt that I supposedly own by central portfolio control. The caller left a message but did n't state what the debt was, who I owed the debt too, and then failed to send a letter of verification of said debt after 5 days of first initial contact. Central portfolio control then called Monday XXXX XXXX and still did not tell me they were a debt collector or the debt they were trying to collect. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: Debt is not mineDescribe what happened so we can understand the issue ... 

I have received a XXXX point reduction in my credit score from experian When I got my score in XX/XX/XXXX it was XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX it is XXXX-XXXX. When I reviewed my credit report I found that XXXX had reported me as having a bill of {$340.00}. I have never received a bill from XXXX and since they put me into collection And have never received a bill from them ( XXXX.. ) This bill is showing as 1 year old. If I had received a bill from either one I would have paid it immediately. I have always paid all of my bills on time. I Called XXXX who. Referred me to XXXX. I called covergent who sent me back to XXXX. XXXX said I would have to go to the collection agency because they can no longer send an itemized bill, when calling convergent again they said they did n't have one but I should pay it anyway. Why would I pay a bill that I never received and did n't know what it was for. I finally filed a dispute with Experian and explained that I never received an itemized bill from either XXXX or XXXX. The answer to my disputewas " It was my bill. " That, of course did not answer my problem. I am sure that you would not pay a bill that gave you a number but not itemized and did not know what it was for. I have been given the runaround enough. 

I called XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX because I wanted to unlock my phone ''. I could n't unlock my phone unless I knew I had a XXXX balance '' and was told by the billing department that I had a XXXX balance and my account was current. I ca n't understand why they would now say this. 
XXXX XXXX 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My credit limit with my card is {$8000.00}. I wanted to make a purchase for about {$15000.00} on the card, and so therefore, I prepaid my credit card by {$7000.00} to effectively increase my spending limit to {$15000.00}. The card issuer did not restrict me from making the prepayment and therefore I did so. When I made the purchase, it was declined. Upon talking to customer service at the credit card company, they said that the act of prepaying the card does not increase temporary increase the credit limit -- contrary to intuition of providing the card company with a secured prepayment. I then authorized a hard pull on my credit to see if the limit could be permanently raised to {$16000.00}, taking into consideration the prepayment. The hard pull was performed and the request was denied. This hard pull will impact my credit for the next two years, and the company would not allow me to consolidate this hard pull with a previous hard pull I made to increase my credit line in XXXX 2015. 

In summary, I would like to make a {$15000.00} purchase with my card, and I prepaid the card by {$7000.00} thinking the limit of {$8000.00} would be effectively raised to {$15000.00}. This card company will not allow me to do so, and I believe it should since I provided a secured prepayment. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: In 2007 While I was being treated for XXXX XXXX My Identity was stolen and my credit cards were stolen I reported it to all of my creditors as soon as I became aware of what was going on However none of the creditors were willing to help. Instead they reported and sold the accounts to collection agency 's. The collection agency 's have seine sold the paper to other collection agency 's. I disputed the the debts with the credit reporting agency many times the dates are inaccurate the accounts are over seven years old They were caused by Identity Theft and I did not benefit in any way. I locked my credit report for several years I have been unable to resolve the issue with the credit reporting agency. Mean while I have been harassed and threatened by the collection agency 's I am on SS XXXX and have been for over seven years. This has caused me great hardship as I can not even qualify for an apartment to live in. All of my Student loans have been discharged yet the reporting agency continues to report them as in collection. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: My mortgage loan was acquired by Green Tree from XXXX, XXXX. I have made my payments during my 20 year, fixed-rate mortgage. Now that my mortgage is paid in full, after paying my regular monthly payments as provided for in my statements, Green Tree has sent me a statement indicating there is an additional {$11000.00} due. I believe their records are incorrect and dispute this amount. 

I have tried to get information from my account representative multiple times during the XXXX week of XXXX. However, she has not given me the information I have requested. I even faxed copies of my records to her, and she has not responded. 

Company response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
Consumer complaint: XXXX XXXX is a collection agency attempting to collect for doctors bills from emergency room visits. I provided my insurance information at the time of the visits and numerous times afterwards. When I try to contact the providers, I 'm told I need to speak to XXXX. When I call XXXX, they tell me that they are unable to bill the insurance. The insurance paid out all bills that were sent and my co-payments were paid. I 've tried disputing the accounts with the credit bureaus but they refuse to update my credit report. 3 accounts from 2 separate dates. 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response
Consumer complaint: I just want my credit score, and none of the websites are allowing me to do so. It asks me questions that do not relate to me at all, Asking about loans I do not have etc, it usually asks questions I know the answers too since I am who I say I am, I just need some real help getting it, this is to complicated 

Company response: Company chooses not to provide a public response