// File: CamTVToken.sol



// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED
pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

import "./ERC20.sol";
import "./ERC20Detailed.sol";

contract CAMToken is ERC20, ERC20Detailed {
    constructor(uint256 initialSupply) ERC20Detailed("CAM Token", "CAM", 0) public {
        _mint(msg.sender, initialSupply);
        _initManagers(msg.sender);
    }
}
// File: ERC20.sol



pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

import "./IERC20.sol";
import "./SafeMath.sol";

/**
 * @dev Implementation of the {IERC20} interface.
 *
 * This implementation is agnostic to the way tokens are created. This means
 * that a supply mechanism has to be added in a derived contract using {_mint}.
 * For a generic mechanism see {ERC20PresetMinterPauser}.
 *
 * TIP: For a detailed writeup see our guide
 * https://forum.zeppelin.solutions/t/how-to-implement-erc20-supply-mechanisms/226[How
 * to implement supply mechanisms].
 *
 * We have followed general OpenZeppelin guidelines: functions revert instead
 * of returning `false` on failure. This behavior is nonetheless conventional
 * and does not conflict with the expectations of ERC20 applications.
 *
 * Additionally, an {Approval} event is emitted on calls to {transferFrom}.
 * This allows applications to reconstruct the allowance for all accounts just
 * by listening to said events. Other implementations of the EIP may not emit
 * these events, as it isn't required by the specification.
 *
 * Finally, the non-standard {decreaseAllowance} and {increaseAllowance}
 * functions have been added to mitigate the well-known issues around setting
 * allowances. See {IERC20-approve}.
 */
contract ERC20 is IERC20 {
    using SafeMath for uint256;

    mapping (address => uint256) private _balances;

    mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) private _allowed;

    uint256 private _totalSupply;
  
    address[] public addresses;
  
    mapping (address => bool) public whitelisted;
  
    mapping(address => bool) public managers;
    address[] managersArray;

    /**
    * @dev Total number of tokens in existence
    */
    function totalSupply() public view returns (uint256) {
        return _totalSupply;
    }
  
    function addManager(address newManagerAddress) public restricted{
        require(!managers[newManagerAddress]);
        
        managers[newManagerAddress] = true;
        managersArray.push(newManagerAddress);
    }
    
    function deleteManager(address managerAddress) public restricted{
        require(managers[managerAddress]);
        require(managersArray.length > 1);
        
        delete managers[managerAddress];
        
        //remove from array
        for(uint i = 0; i < managersArray.length; i++)
        {
            if(managersArray[i] == managerAddress)
            {
                delete managersArray[i];
                //managersArray.length--;
                return;
            }
        }
    }
    
    function viewManagers() public view returns (address[] memory){
        return managersArray;
    }
    
    function getAddressLength() public view returns(uint256) {
        return addresses.length;
    }
    
    function getWhitelistedAddressStatusFromIndex(uint256 index) public view returns(bool){
        return whitelisted[addresses[index]];
    }

    /**
    * @dev Gets the balance of the specified address.
    * @param owner The address to query the the balance of.
    * @return An uint256 representing the amount owned by the passed address.
    */
    function balanceOf(address owner) public view returns (uint256) {
        return _balances[owner];
    }
    
    /**
    * @dev Function to check the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
    * @param owner address The address which owns the funds.
    * @param spender address The address which will spend the funds.
    * @return A uint256 specifying the amount of tokens still available for the spender.
    */
    function allowance(
        address owner,
        address spender
    )
    public
    view
    returns (uint256)
    {
        return _allowed[owner][spender];
    }
  
    function assign(address to, uint256 value) restricted {
        _balances[msg.sender] = _balances[msg.sender].sub(value);
        _balances[to] = _balances[to].add(value);
    }
  

    /**
    * @dev Transfer token for a specified address
    * @param to The address to transfer to.
    * @param value The amount to be transferred.
    */
    function transfer(address to, uint256 value) public returns (bool) {
        if(!managers[msg.sender]) {
            if(now < 1672531260)
                revert("You cannot move your tokens until 01/01/2023!");
            require(whitelisted[to], "ERC20: address not in whitelist");
        }
    
        require(value <= _balances[msg.sender]);
        require(to != address(0));

        _balances[msg.sender] = _balances[msg.sender].sub(value);
        _balances[to] = _balances[to].add(value);
        emit Transfer(msg.sender, to, value);
        return true;
    }
  
    function addWhitelistAddress(address newWhitelistedAddress) public restricted {
        whitelisted[newWhitelistedAddress] = true;
        // whitelistAmount = whitelistAmount + 1;
        addresses.push(newWhitelistedAddress);
    }

    function addWhitelistAddresses(address[] memory newWhitelistedAddresses) public restricted {
        for(uint48 i=0; i < newWhitelistedAddresses.length; i++) {
            whitelisted[newWhitelistedAddresses[i]] = true;
            addresses.push(newWhitelistedAddresses[i]);
        }
    }
 
    function removeWhitelistedAddress(address addressToRemove) public restricted {
        require(whitelisted[addressToRemove]);
        whitelisted[addressToRemove] = false;
    }

    /**
    * @dev Approve the passed address to spend the specified amount of tokens on behalf of msg.sender.
    * Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk that someone may use both the old
    * and the new allowance by unfortunate transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this
    * race condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the desired value afterwards:
    * https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729
    * @param spender The address which will spend the funds.
    * @param value The amount of tokens to be spent.
    */
    function approve(address spender, uint256 value) public returns (bool) {
        require(spender != address(0));

        _allowed[msg.sender][spender] = value;
        emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, value);
        return true;
    }

    /**
    * @dev Transfer tokens from one address to another
    * @param from address The address which you want to send tokens from
    * @param to address The address which you want to transfer to
    * @param value uint256 the amount of tokens to be transferred
    */
    function transferFrom(
        address from,
        address to,
        uint256 value
    )
    public
    returns (bool)
    {
        if(!managers[msg.sender]) {
            if(now < 1672531260)
                revert("You cannot move your tokens until 01/01/2023!");
            require(whitelisted[to], "ERC20: address not in whitelist");
        }
        
        require(value <= _balances[from]);
        require(value <= _allowed[from][msg.sender]);
        require(to != address(0));

        _balances[from] = _balances[from].sub(value);
        _balances[to] = _balances[to].add(value);
        _allowed[from][msg.sender] = _allowed[from][msg.sender].sub(value);
        emit Transfer(from, to, value);
    return true;
  }

    /**
    * @dev Increase the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
    * approve should be called when allowed_[_spender] == 0. To increment
    * allowed value is better to use this function to avoid 2 calls (and wait until
    * the first transaction is mined)
    * From MonolithDAO Token.sol
    * @param spender The address which will spend the funds.
    * @param addedValue The amount of tokens to increase the allowance by.
    */
    function increaseAllowance(
        address spender,
        uint256 addedValue
    )
    public
    returns (bool)
    {
        require(spender != address(0));

        _allowed[msg.sender][spender] = (
        _allowed[msg.sender][spender].add(addedValue));
        emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, _allowed[msg.sender][spender]);
        return true;
    }

    /**
    * @dev Decrease the amount of tokens that an owner allowed to a spender.
    * approve should be called when allowed_[_spender] == 0. To decrement
    * allowed value is better to use this function to avoid 2 calls (and wait until
    * the first transaction is mined)
    * From MonolithDAO Token.sol
    * @param spender The address which will spend the funds.
    * @param subtractedValue The amount of tokens to decrease the allowance by.
    */
    function decreaseAllowance(
        address spender,
        uint256 subtractedValue
    )
    public
    returns (bool)
    {
        require(spender != address(0));
        _allowed[msg.sender][spender] = (
        _allowed[msg.sender][spender].sub(subtractedValue));
        emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, _allowed[msg.sender][spender]);
        return true;
    }

    /**
    * @dev Internal function that mints an amount of the token and assigns it to
    * an account. This encapsulates the modification of balances such that the
    * proper events are emitted.
    * @param account The account that will receive the created tokens.
    * @param amount The amount that will be created.
    */
    function _mint(address account, uint256 amount) internal {
        require(account != 0);
        _totalSupply = _totalSupply.add(amount);
        _balances[account] = _balances[account].add(amount);
        emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount);
    }
  
    function _initManagers(address firstAdmin) internal {
        managers[firstAdmin] = true;
        managersArray.push(firstAdmin);
    }

    /**
    * @dev Function that burns an amount of the token of a given
    * account.
    * @param amount The amount that will be burnt.
    */
    function burn(uint256 amount) public restricted {
        address account = managersArray[0];
        
        require(account != address(0), "ERC20: burn from the zero address");

        _balances[account] = _balances[account].sub(amount, "ERC20: burn amount exceeds balance");
        _totalSupply = _totalSupply.sub(amount);
        emit Transfer(account, address(0), amount);
    }
    /**
    * @dev Internal function that burns an amount of the token of a given
    * account, deducting from the sender's allowance for said account. Uses the
    * internal burn function.
    * @param account The account whose tokens will be burnt.
    * @param amount The amount that will be burnt.
    */
    function _burnFrom(address account, uint256 amount) internal {
        require(amount <= _allowed[account][msg.sender]);

        // Should https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/zeppelin-solidity/issues/707 be accepted,
        // this function needs to emit an event with the updated approval.
        _allowed[account][msg.sender] = _allowed[account][msg.sender].sub(amount);
        burn(amount);
    }
  
    modifier restricted() {
        require(managers[msg.sender], "ERC20: Manager not found");
        _;
    }
}
// File: ERC20Detailed.sol



pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

import "./IERC20.sol";


/**
 * @title ERC20Detailed token
 * @dev The decimals are only for visualization purposes.
 * All the operations are done using the smallest and indivisible token unit,
 * just as on Ethereum all the operations are done in wei.
 */
contract ERC20Detailed is IERC20 {
  string private _name;
  string private _symbol;
  uint8 private _decimals;

  constructor(string memory name, string memory symbol, uint8 decimals) public {
    _name = name;
    _symbol = symbol;
    _decimals = decimals;
  }

  /**
   * @return the name of the token.
   */
  function name() public view returns(string memory) {
    return _name;
  }

  /**
   * @return the symbol of the token.
   */
  function symbol() public view returns(string memory) {
    return _symbol;
  }

  /**
   * @return the number of decimals of the token.
   */
  function decimals() public view returns(uint8) {
    return _decimals;
  }
}
// File: IERC20.sol



pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

/**
 * @dev Interface of the ERC20 standard as defined in the EIP.
 */
interface IERC20 {
  function totalSupply() external view returns (uint256);

  function balanceOf(address who) external view returns (uint256);

  function allowance(address owner, address spender)
    external view returns (uint256);

  function transfer(address to, uint256 value) external returns (bool);

  function approve(address spender, uint256 value)
    external returns (bool);

  function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 value)
    external returns (bool);

  event Transfer(
    address indexed from,
    address indexed to,
    uint256 value
  );

  event Approval(
    address indexed owner,
    address indexed spender,
    uint256 value
  );
}
// File: Migrations.sol



pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

contract Migrations {
  address public owner;
  uint public last_completed_migration;

  constructor() public {
    owner = msg.sender;
  }

  modifier restricted() {
    if (msg.sender == owner) _;
  }

  function setCompleted(uint completed) public restricted {
    last_completed_migration = completed;
  }
}

// File: SafeMath.sol



pragma solidity ^0.4.24;

/**
 * @dev Wrappers over Solidity's arithmetic operations with added overflow
 * checks.
 *
 * Arithmetic operations in Solidity wrap on overflow. This can easily result
 * in bugs, because programmers usually assume that an overflow raises an
 * error, which is the standard behavior in high level programming languages.
 * `SafeMath` restores this intuition by reverting the transaction when an
 * operation overflows.
 *
 * Using this library instead of the unchecked operations eliminates an entire
 * class of bugs, so it's recommended to use it always.
 */
library SafeMath {
    /**
     * @dev Returns the addition of two unsigned integers, reverting on
     * overflow.
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `+` operator.
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - Addition cannot overflow.
     */
    function add(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        uint256 c = a + b;
        require(c >= a, "SafeMath: addition overflow");

        return c;
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the subtraction of two unsigned integers, reverting on
     * overflow (when the result is negative).
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `-` operator.
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - Subtraction cannot overflow.
     */
    function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        return sub(a, b, "SafeMath: subtraction overflow");
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the subtraction of two unsigned integers, reverting with custom message on
     * overflow (when the result is negative).
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `-` operator.
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - Subtraction cannot overflow.
     *
     * _Available since v2.4.0._
     */
    function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b, string memory errorMessage) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        require(b <= a, errorMessage);
        uint256 c = a - b;

        return c;
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the multiplication of two unsigned integers, reverting on
     * overflow.
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `*` operator.
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - Multiplication cannot overflow.
     */
    function mul(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        // Gas optimization: this is cheaper than requiring 'a' not being zero, but the
        // benefit is lost if 'b' is also tested.
        // See: https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/522
        if (a == 0) {
            return 0;
        }

        uint256 c = a * b;
        require(c / a == b, "SafeMath: multiplication overflow");

        return c;
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the integer division of two unsigned integers. Reverts on
     * division by zero. The result is rounded towards zero.
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `/` operator. Note: this function uses a
     * `revert` opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity
     * uses an invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - The divisor cannot be zero.
     */
    function div(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        return div(a, b, "SafeMath: division by zero");
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the integer division of two unsigned integers. Reverts with custom message on
     * division by zero. The result is rounded towards zero.
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `/` operator. Note: this function uses a
     * `revert` opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity
     * uses an invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - The divisor cannot be zero.
     *
     * _Available since v2.4.0._
     */
    function div(uint256 a, uint256 b, string memory errorMessage) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        // Solidity only automatically asserts when dividing by 0
        require(b > 0, errorMessage);
        uint256 c = a / b;
        // assert(a == b * c + a % b); // There is no case in which this doesn't hold

        return c;
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the remainder of dividing two unsigned integers. (unsigned integer modulo),
     * Reverts when dividing by zero.
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `%` operator. This function uses a `revert`
     * opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity uses an
     * invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - The divisor cannot be zero.
     */
    function mod(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        return mod(a, b, "SafeMath: modulo by zero");
    }

    /**
     * @dev Returns the remainder of dividing two unsigned integers. (unsigned integer modulo),
     * Reverts with custom message when dividing by zero.
     *
     * Counterpart to Solidity's `%` operator. This function uses a `revert`
     * opcode (which leaves remaining gas untouched) while Solidity uses an
     * invalid opcode to revert (consuming all remaining gas).
     *
     * Requirements:
     * - The divisor cannot be zero.
     *
     * _Available since v2.4.0._
     */
    function mod(uint256 a, uint256 b, string memory errorMessage) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        require(b != 0, errorMessage);
        return a % b;
    }
}