static inline int mnt_hold_writers(struct mount *mnt)
{
	mnt->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_WRITE_HOLD;
	/*
	 * After storing MNT_WRITE_HOLD, we'll read the counters. This store
	 * should be visible before we do.
	 */
	smp_mb();

	/*
	 * With writers on hold, if this value is zero, then there are
	 * definitely no active writers (although held writers may subsequently
	 * increment the count, they'll have to wait, and decrement it after
	 * seeing MNT_READONLY).
	 *
	 * It is OK to have counter incremented on one CPU and decremented on
	 * another: the sum will add up correctly. The danger would be when we
	 * sum up each counter, if we read a counter before it is incremented,
	 * but then read another CPU's count which it has been subsequently
	 * decremented from -- we would see more decrements than we should.
	 * MNT_WRITE_HOLD protects against this scenario, because
	 * mnt_want_write first increments count, then smp_mb, then spins on
	 * MNT_WRITE_HOLD, so it can't be decremented by another CPU while
	 * we're counting up here.
	 */
	if (mnt_get_writers(mnt) > 0)
		return -EBUSY;

	return 0;
}
static inline int mnt_hold_writers(struct mount *mnt)
{
	mnt->mnt.mnt_flags |= MNT_WRITE_HOLD;
	 
	smp_mb();

	 
	if (mnt_get_writers(mnt) > 0)
		return -EBUSY;

	return 0;
}