Samtyckeslag: Efter hovrättens friande dom i det uppmärksammade målet med en 15-årig flicka och sex pojkar blossar debatten om en samtyckesparagraf upp igen. http://mobil.svd.se/c.jsp;jsessionid...p%3bnew%3dtrue  Hur skulle en samtyckesparagraf påverka jämställdheten och relationer över huvud taget? Som jag förstår det skulle helt vanliga sexuella möten kunna klassas som våldtäkt eftersom det inte alltid finns ett uttryckligt samtycke även om inget övergrepp har skett.

Annotator 1 assessment: category: Stereotype (A widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing. Includes: Gender essentialism/Benevolent sexism/Intersectional, identity-based misogyny/Transmisogyny and homophobia )
comment: This was difficult to label. It seems to contain an idea that was very common when samtyckeslagen was debated, that men could be accused of rape very easily if they had sex with a woman.

Annotator 2 assessment: category: Anti-feminism and denial of discrimination (Opposing feminism, believing that feminism is not necessary or that women should not have the same rights as men do. Includes: The belief that men are discriminated against/that discrimination doesn’t exist)

Annotator 3 assessment: category: Violence against women (Intent to assert power over women through threats of violence. Includes: Rape and sexual violence/Domestic and other violence/Degrading language)