Natofrågan: fruntimmer efter fruntimmer i debatt: I detta allvarliga säkerhetspolitiska läge noterar jag (i riksdagens debatt) att de bara släpper fram fruntimmer efter fruntimmer för att svamla. Är det helt plötsligt kärringar som ska fatta de största besluten,  Jag menar inte blödningar (förutom ebba kanske ), Men ska kärringar på riktigt bestämma över militären? Tänk om de har PMS?

Annotator 1 assessment: category: Stereotype (A widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing. Includes: Gender essentialism/Benevolent sexism/Intersectional, identity-based misogyny/Transmisogyny and homophobia )

Annotator 2 assessment: category: Stereotype (A widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing. Includes: Gender essentialism/Benevolent sexism/Intersectional, identity-based misogyny/Transmisogyny and homophobia )
comment: It also contains a  degrading language,  'fruntimmer', 'kärringar'

Annotator 3 assessment: category: Anti-feminism and denial of discrimination (Opposing feminism, believing that feminism is not necessary or that women should not have the same rights as men do. Includes: The belief that men are discriminated against/that discrimination doesn’t exist)