Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1696592334975.pdf (United States)
IV 118TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. RES.

561 Expressing opposition to the use of State power against people in the United States seeking essential health care, including criminalization of the full range of sexual and reproductive health care such as abortion, gender-affirming care, and contraceptive care, and disapproving of State punishment of people for their pregnancy outcomes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUNE 27, 2023 Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia (for herself, Ms. ADAMS, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. ESCOBAR, Ms. LOIS FRANKEL of Florida, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Ms. JA- COBS, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. LEGER FERNANDEZ, Mrs. MCBATH, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. CROCKETT, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. NOR- TON, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. GARCI´A of Illinois, Mr. EVANS, Mrs. TRAHAN, Mr. MORELLE, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. SEWELL, Mrs. MCCLELLAN, Mr.
BOWMAN, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. TITUS, Mr. PETERS, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr.
FROST, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. TOKUDA, Mr. TRONE, Ms. STEVENS, Ms. MENG, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. TORRES of New York, Ms. BROWN, Ms. BARRAGA´N, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. BROWNLEY, Mr. SCHIFF, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. STRICKLAND, Ms. BUSH, Mr. GOMEZ, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CASAR, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KAMLAGER- DOVE, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. CASTEN, Mr. MFUME, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. MCGARVEY, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. POCAN, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Ms. PORTER, Mr. CA´RDENAS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. WILSON of Florida, and Mr. MCGOVERN) submitted the following resolu- tion; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subse- quently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned RESOLUTION Expressing opposition to the use of State power against people in the United States seeking essential health care, including criminalization of the full range of sexual and reproductive health care such as abortion, gender-affirm- ing care, and contraceptive care, and disapproving of State punishment of people for their pregnancy out- comes.
Whereas most people will need access to sexual and reproduc- tive health care at some point in their lifetimes, whether it be abortion, contraception, or gender-affirming care; Whereas the ability of people to access and make decisions about the full range of sexual and reproductive health care is essential to the health, well-being, and autonomy of all people and to the health and well-being of society; Whereas providers of sexual, reproductive, and gender-affirm- ing health care, and those who support people making important health care decisions, are essential and play a critical role in ensuring people are able to have control over their own bodies and lives; Whereas people deserve to be treated with dignity, empathy, compassion, and respect by their health care providers; Whereas people need their health care providers to be able to provide or refer for essential health care without facing punishment or criminal or civil charges for supporting the autonomous decisions of an individual with respect to their own body and life; Whereas no person should face State-sanctioned punishment for— •HRES 561 IH (1) seeking or obtaining an abortion, or any preg- nancy outcome or decision; (2) seeking or using contraception; (3) seeking or obtaining gender-affirming care; (4) their sexual health status; or (5) for helping someone access the essential health care they need; Whereas people have been penalized or prosecuted in the United States for actions during their pregnancy that the State alleged caused harm or risk to their pregnancies; Whereas people have been prosecuted for not seeking health care, for experiencing a miscarriage or stillbirth, for self- managing an abortion, for alcohol or drug use during pregnancy, and for their HIV status; Whereas research shows there is an increased need and de- mand for medications to self-manage an
 abortion in States with abortion restrictions, and that self-managed abortion with access to medications and accurate infor- mation is safe and effective; Whereas the reasons why people self-manage an abortion are varied and valid; Whereas States and localities have attempted to impose civil and criminal penalties on people who help others access the gender-affirming and reproductive health care they need, including abortion care; Whereas at least 1 State has passed a law attempting to re- strict some out-of-State travel for abortions, and other States have attempted to curtail out-of-State travel for abortion care or the facilitation thereof, in violation of basic constitutional principles, including the right to trav- el; •HRES 561 IH Whereas people have been and continue to be coerced or forced to undergo unwanted medical procedures or sur- gical interventions that negatively impact their sexual and reproductive health, including involuntary steriliza- tion, involuntary cesarean sections, and procedures to change the intersex traits of minors; Whereas coercive or unwanted medical or surgical interven- tions that negate individual autonomy are distinct from gender-affirming care, do not constitute essential health care or sexual and reproductive health care, and are not included within the full range of such care that this reso- lution describes; Whereas more than 30 States around the country have ad- vanced legislation designed to severely limit access to nec- essary gender-affirming care, especially for young people, which is against the recommendations of major medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pedi- atrics; Whereas 3 States have enacted, and nearly 15 have intro- duced, legislation designed to criminalize and penalize providing gender-affirming care to young
 people, pro- viders of gender-affirming care for young people, and the parents of those young people for enabling access to this essential care; Whereas some States are considering legislation that would use the power of the State to remove children from the care of their parent if that parent supports access to gen- der-affirming care for the child; Whereas States and localities have prohibited health care pro- viders in some cases have criminalized the provision of, gender-affirming and repro- from providing, and •HRES 561 IH ductive health care, including abortion care, to patients who are seeking such care whether in person or via tele- health; Whereas States and localities have attempted to prohibit health care providers from referring, and in some cases have attempted to criminalize the referral of, patients to out-of-State resources to receive the gender-affirming and reproductive health care they seek, including abortion care; Whereas States have aimed to restrict the ability of patients to access sexual and reproductive health care by threat- ening provider licensure, certification, or renewal, if even suspected of providing care, regardless of conviction; Whereas the threat of criminalization or prosecution can re- sult in a chilling effect by intimidating people into not seeking or providing needed care; Whereas health care providers have an ethical obligation to provide essential health care to their patients and to pro- tect the private medical information integral to the pa- tient-provider relationship; Whereas limiting the ability of a health care provider to up- hold their ethical obligations to provide essential health care, including sexual and reproductive health care, to patients is a violation of their rights and subjects them to moral injury; Whereas the State
 advances no legitimate interest by impos- ing civil or criminal penalties on medically appropriate sexual and reproductive health care, including abortion, contraception, and gender-affirming care, and has no le- gitimate interest in criminalizing pregnancy outcomes; •HRES 561 IH Whereas State laws criminalizing sexual and reproductive health care, including gender-affirming care and abortion care, sometimes enacted under the guise of protection, constitute an abuse of the power of the State that denies individuals their fundamental rights; Whereas, even when charges are dropped or the defendant is exonerated, the long-term consequences of arrest or pros- ecution are irreparable; Whereas Black, indigenous, people of color, immigrants, peo- ple with low incomes, LGBTQI+ individuals, and other marginalized individuals are more likely, due to persistent disparities and oppression, to experience adverse preg- nancy outcomes that place them under the scrutiny of the legal system; Whereas groups like the American Medical Association, American Public Health Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Society of Addiction Medicine, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Bar Association, and others oppose State- sanctioned punishment for pregnancy outcomes and op- pose criminalizing providers and the provision of health care; Whereas Black, indigenous, people of color, immigrants, peo- ple with low incomes, LGBTQI+ individuals, and other marginalized individuals are more likely to be surveilled, arrested, charged, prosecuted, convicted, and heavily pun- ished within the criminal justice system; Whereas, in the 2022 Abortion Care Guidelines issued by the World Health Organization, the World Health Organiza- tion recommends the full decriminalization of
 abortion; •HRES 561 IH Whereas human rights bodies, including the United Nations Human Rights Committee, have long said that govern- ments that apply criminal sanctions against people who have an abortion, or medical providers who assist people in having an abortion, violate human rights principles and laws; Whereas human rights bodies have explicitly described crim- inalization of abortion and attacks on LGBTQI+ health as a form of gender-based violence; Whereas punishing people for their pregnancy outcomes or for seeking or providing essential reproductive and sexual health care, or supporting access to such care, violates their fundamental rights; and Whereas several States have recognized these facts and taken steps— (1) to repeal or reform laws that had been used to criminalize pregnancy outcomes; and (2) to pass laws to increase access to abortion, con- traception, and gender-affirming care: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives— (1) condemns the application or use of criminal laws to punish people for the outcomes of their preg- nancies; (2) affirms that people deserve access to high- quality health care without fear of reprisal or pun- ishment; (3) condemns the criminalization of providing or supporting access to essential health care; •HRES 561 IH (4) affirms the ethical obligations of health care providers to safeguard patient privacy and the pri- vate medical information integral to the patient-pro- vider relationship; and (5) declares a goal for a future in which— (A) the ability of patients to access
 sexual and reproductive health care, including abor- tion, contraception, and gender-affirming care, is universally free from restrictions, bans, and barriers; and (B) people are able— (i) to exercise self-determination in their reproductive and sexual health; and (ii) manage care on their own terms, free from coercion, discrimination, or pun- ishment; and (6) affirms the commitment of Congress to working toward the goal established in paragraph (5) in partnership with providers, patients, advo- cates, and their communities.
•HRES 561 IH