Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1696592450746.pdf (United States)
I 118TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION H. R. 4268 To authorize grants to eligible entities to pay for travel-related expenses and logistical support for individuals with respect to accessing abortion services, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUNE 21, 2023 Ms. STRICKLAND (for herself, Mrs. FLETCHER, Ms. BUSH, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. POCAN, Mr. CLEAVER, Ms. TITUS, Mr. CONNOLLY, Ms. CHU, Ms. CROCKETT, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. KAMLAGER-DOVE, Ms. SA´NCHEZ, Mr. CASTEN, Mrs. MCCLELLAN, Ms. DELBENE, and Mrs. RA- MIREZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce A BILL To authorize grants to eligible entities to pay for travel- related expenses and logistical support for individuals with respect to accessing abortion services, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.

SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reproductive Health Travel Fund Act of 2023’’.

 SEC.

2.

FINDINGS.
2.

FINDINGS.

Congress finds as follows: (1) On June 24, 2022, in its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (142 S. Ct. 2228 (2022)) (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Dobbs decision’’), the Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)), eliminating the constitutional right to abortion and reversing dec- ades of precedent recognizing the constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy.
(2) While abortion has never been available to all even under Roe v. Wade, the Dobbs decision has decimated access for millions of people in the United States.

More than half of States have already banned abortion or are likely to do so.

In fact, just 100 days after the Dobbs decision was announced, 66 clinics across 15 States had already been forced to stop offering abortion services.
(3) As expected, the implications of the Dobbs decision will fall hardest on people who already face barriers to health care access due to systemic bar- riers and discrimination, particularly Black people, Indigenous people, and other people of color, people with disabilities, people in rural areas, young people, people with documentation barriers, LGBTQ+ peo- ple, people who are parenting, people with complex 26 •HR 4268 IH medical needs who require hospital-based care, and people having difficulty making ends meet.
(4) Abortion bans prevent many people from ac- cessing care they want and need.

An estimated 10,670 fewer people accessed abortions at clinics in the first 2 months immediately following the Dobbs decision.

(5) People have always had abortions and al- ways will, even in the face of legal, financial, and logistical barriers, or criminalization.
While some will self-manage their abortions, and have the option of using pills that are medically safe and effective, many others are traveling hundreds of miles out of State, or are forced to carry pregnancies to term.

(6) Just months after the Dobbs decision, one- third of women of reproductive age in the United States faced excessive travel times for abortion.

For residents of States that had banned abortion, travel times increased by more than 4 hours on average.
Black women faced the greatest impact, with 40 per- cent needing to drive at least 1 hour for abortion care after the decision, versus 15 percent before the decision.
(7) Longer travel times lead to a host of other burdens for abortion patients, including the cost of •HR 4268 IH transportation, food, lodging, childcare, and lost wages.
(8) Abortion funds and practical support funds (referred to in this section as ‘‘funds’’) are commu- nity-based organizations that support people in over- coming financial and logistical barriers to abortion care.

(9) Funds work together to remove financial and logistical barriers to abortion access and have been doing this work for decades.

Some of these bar- riers are transportation, food, lodging, childcare, translation, doula services, among other barriers.
(10) Many funds are led by people who have had abortions themselves, including a growing base of Black and Brown leaders who have themselves faced abortion obstacles and understand the complex circumstances individuals may face.

(11) Abortion funds have a history of being under-resourced and rely mostly on volunteer time and energy to support communities.
(12) Abortion and practical support funds hold some of the closest ties to people who are having abortions and have the first-hand experience, up-to- date and on-the-ground knowledge, and the regional •HR 4268 IH and national connections needed to support abortion seekers financially, emotionally, or logistically.
(13) More and more States are seeking to ban abortion or enact extreme restrictions, significantly limiting the circumstances in which abortions are available.

Furthermore, people have been prevented from seeking care because of the confusion created by abortion restrictions, which has contributed to a chilling effect for people seeking legal care out of State.
People seeking abortions often do not have a full understanding of the abortion laws in their State and people calling abortion funds for support often ask if they are doing something illegal by trav- eling to get care.

Abortion funds serve to mitigate this confusion and directly connect people to accu- rate information.

(14) Clinics in States where abortion is legal and more accessible continue to receive an influx of people seeking abortions.
Provider shortages, to- gether with this rapid increase in patients, is caus- ing longer waits for appointments, particularly for clinics near States with bans, many of which have had waiting times of more than 3 weeks.
(15) When people are not able to access an abortion when they need it, they are often forced to •HR 4268 IH seek an abortion much further into their pregnancy.

This increases costs exponentially.


Barriers to abor- tion care after the Dobbs decision have led to an in- creasing complexity in the cases that abortion funds are managing.

People who are forced to cross State lines for abortion care may need support for coordi- nating and paying for higher logistical barriers (such as transportation, lodging, meals, childcare, medica- tion) to access the abortion care they want, need, and deserve.
For many, the increased financial bur- den will push abortion care completely out of reach without financial and logistical assistance for ap- pointment costs and travel.

(16) Funds often collaborate to fully meet the needs of people who are facing barriers to their abortion care, including by filling any remaining funding gaps or referring a caller traveling across regions to another fund.
A national network of al- most 100 abortion and practical support funds has demonstrated these funds are uniquely positioned to lead at this moment and need support.

1 •HR 4268 IH 7 SEC.

3.
3.

GRANTS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS AC- CESSING ABORTION SERVICES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may award grants to eligible entities to pay for travel-related expenses and logistical support for individuals with respect to ac- cessing abortion services.
(b) TIMING.—Beginning not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall so- licit applications for grants under this section.
(c) USE OF FUNDS.— (1) PERMISSIBLE USES.—An eligible entity re- ceiving a grant under this section shall use the grant for travel-related expenses and logistical support for individuals with respect to accessing abortion serv- ices, which may include any of the following ex- penses and support: (A) Round trip travel to the location where the abortion services are provided.

(B) Lodging.

(C) Meals.

(D) Childcare.

(E) Translation services.

(F) Doula care.


1 •HR 4268 IH (G) Patient education and information services.

(H) Lost wages.
(H) Lost wages.

(2) ORGANIZATIONAL COSTS.—An eligible enti- ty receiving a grant under this section may use up to, but not more than, 15 percent of the grant funds to cover organizational costs such as— (A) community outreach efforts; (B) physical infrastructure construction and maintenance; (C) website development and maintenance; and (D) increasing staff capacity and training.
(3) IMPERMISSIBLE USES.—An eligible entity receiving a grant under this section shall not use the grant for costs of an abortion procedure.

(d) APPLICATIONS.—To seek a grant under this sec- tion, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(e) PRIORITY.—In selecting the recipients of grants under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to eligi- ble entities that •HR 4268 IH (1) serve individuals who live in a jurisdiction that has banned or severely restricted access to abortion; (2) serve individuals who travel to a jurisdiction other than the one where they live to be provided abortion services; or (3) have a program in operation, or submit as part of the application required under subsection (d) a plan to establish and operate a program, to help individuals access abortion services.
(f) ANNUAL REPORTS TO CONGRESS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the program under this section.

(2) CONFIDENTIALITY.—The reports under paragraph (1) shall not include any individually identifiable information.
(g) PREEMPTION.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The provisions of this sec- tion shall supersede any provision of State, Tribal, territorial, or local law that would have the effect of prohibiting any use of funds provided for under this section.
•HR 4268 IH 10 (2) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL COOPERATION IN ANTIABORTION PROCEEDINGS.—No Federal agen- cy or official engaged in carrying out the program under this section may cooperate with any State, Tribal, territorial, or local antiabortion proceeding, including any antiabortion investigation, prosecution, or civil lawsuit, relating to the activities carried out under such program or any individual or entity re- ceiving or providing services under such program.
(h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: (1) The term ‘‘eligible entity’’— (A) means a nonprofit organization, or a community-based organization, that assists in- dividuals seeking an abortion through pro- grams, services, or activities that are unbiased and medically and factually accurate; and (B) excludes any entity that discourages individuals from seeking an abortion.
(2) The term ‘‘nonprofit organization’’ means an organization that— (A) is described in subsection (c)(3) of sec- tion 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and (B) is, under subsection (a) of such sec- tion, exempt from taxation.
•HR 4268 IH 11 1 2 3 (i) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To carry out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated $350,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.
•HR 4268 IH