316usman/thematic5b huggingface dataset:
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1694846160968.pdf (South Africa)
IMPACT OF LOADSHEDDING PRESENTED BY DR S. MANKUPANE 20 FEBRUARY 2023 PURPOSE • To outline and highlight the impact of loadshedding on Hospital Services.

BACKGROUND: • Loadshedding in hospitals arises through different aetiological causes.

1.

Scheduled loadshedding by Eskom 2.

Breakage of electrical infrastructure like transformers outside the hospitals 3.

Theft and vandalism of electrical cables in or outside the hospitals 4.
Failure in backup mechanisms of diesel generators IMPACT OF LOADSHEDDING AT HEALTH FACILITIES • Loadshedding affects sensitive machinery within the Hospitals ITEM AREAS AFFECTED CONSEQUENCES Boilers • • The steam reticulation system is not operational • No steam Laundry services are affected • Poor Supply of Linen • Kitchen services are affected • Poor supply of Food • Auto-claves are affected • Lack of sterilization of equipment IMPACT ON CLINICAL SPACE • Loadshedding affecting Clinical Areas ITEM AFFECTED AREAS CONSEQUENCES Information Technology System • Patient records • Delayed retrieval of patient files – long waiting times • PACS System • Delayed reporting of Radiological reports.
Long waiting times for patients • NHLS blood results system • Delayed retrieval of blood results – long waiting times • General ICT system supporting support • Cancellation or inefficiencies of operating services services Cost Implications • High costs for procuring of huge quantities • Over-expenditure of budget allocation for Diesel of Diesel IMPACT OF LOADSHEDDING ITEM AREAS AFFECTED CONSEQUENCES Theatre Operations • Elective cases not done • Surgical Backlogs Critical Care Areas (ICU and HIGH CARE AREAS) • Most equipment's can only run for 30 minutes • Morbidity and potential mortalities without power on back up supply Hot Water Challenges • Bathing of patients affected and the sterilization if • Potential Infection Outbreaks water affected IMPACT OF LOADSHEDING ON HOSPITALS GENERATORS • This equipment runs more than the time allowed in the service plan, • This causes the equipment to be serviced twice or more than the planned scheduled intervals hence higher expenditure on maintenance.
• This pushes the cost of fuel higher than in the normal situation, • Constant repairs due to burning of circuit breakers • As generators are meant to be for standby, excessive use can lead to premature failure.

CONCLUSION • Hospitals on exemption of loadshedding are ferrying much better in terms of the consequences of electricity outages.

• Loadshedding exerting heavy demands on the diesel generators and the diesel supply.

THANK YOU 8
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1696590932499.pdf (United States)
In the House of Representatives, U. S., December 6, 2022.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 198) entitled ‘‘An Act to require the Federal Communications Commission to incorporate data on maternal health outcomes into its broadband health maps.’’, do pass with the following AMENDMENT: Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: SECTION 1.

SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Data Mapping to Save Moms’ Lives Act’’.

SEC.

2.
SEC.

2.

MAPPING BROADBAND CONNECTIVITY AND MATER- NAL HEALTH OUTCOMES.

(a) INCORPORATION OF MATERNAL MORTALITY AND SEVERE MATERNAL MORBIDITY DATA.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall incorporate publicly available data on maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity, including for not less than 1 year postpartum, into the Mapping Broadband Health in America platform 13 of the Commission.
14 15 (b) CONSULTATION WITH CDC.—The Federal Commu- nications Commission shall consult with the Director of the 2 1 2 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention regarding the maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity data that should be incorporated under subsection (a).

Attest: Clerk.

•S 198 EAH 2 D S E S S I O N 1 1 7 T H C O N G R E S S S .

1 9 8 A M E N D M E N T
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1696590934859.pdf (United States)
Date Agency CFDA Jan-June 2017 DHHS/CDC Office of State, Tribal, Local & Territorial Support July 2017 - July 2018 DHHS/CDC Jan-Aug 2017 DHHS/HRSA Jan-Dec 2017 Sept 2017- August 2018 DHHS/HRSA DHHS/HRSA Office of State, Tribal, Local & Territorial Support Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs Name of Program Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services Through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation's Health Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services Through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation's Health Association of State Public Health Nutritionists (ASPHN) Association of State Public Health Nutritionists (ASPHN) Association of State Public Health Nutritionists (ASPHN) August 2018 - July 2019 Sept 2018 - August 2019 DHHS/CDC DHHS/HRSA Center of State, Tribal, Local & Territorial Support Maternal and Child Health Federal Consolidated Programs Association of State Public Health Nutritionists (ASPHN) Association of State Public Health Nutritionists (ASPHN) August 2019 - July 2020 November 2019 - June 2020 DHHS/CDC Center of State, Tribal, Local & Territorial Support Association of State Public Health Nutritionists (ASPHN) DHHS/CDC Center of State, Tribal, Local & Territorial Support American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Name of Grant Grant ID Award Amount To Improve Population Health By Supporting Breastfeeding Building Capacity of Breastfeeding Coalitions to Support Increased Communication and Collaboration Support for Children's Healthy Weight CoIIN Support for Children's Healthy Weight CoIIN Support for Children's Healthy Weight CoIIN Building Capacity to Increase Access to Breastfeeding Support Through a Collaborative Process Support for Children's Healthy Weight CoIIN Building Capacity to Increase Access to Breastfeeding Support Through a Collaborative Process Physician Education, Engagement, and Training on Breastfeeding Culture Plan NU38OT000126-03-00 $ 399,999.00 NU38OT000126-04-00 $ 375,000.00 Contract Contract Contract $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Sub-Contract of NU38OT000279 $ 700,000.00 Contract $ 15,000.00 Sub-Contract of NU38OT000279 $ 850,000.00 Contract $ 24,750.00
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1696591069483.pdf (United States)
Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure Hospitals participating in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program are required annually to complete the Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure question.

Data entry is achieved through the QualityNet Secure Portal available to authorized users.
Performance Measure Name: Maternal Morbidity Structural Measure Description: Assesses whether or not a hospital participates in a Statewide or National Perinatal Quality Improvement (QI) Collaborative initiative, and implements patient safety practices and/or bundles related to maternal morbidity from that QI Collaborative.
If the hospital provides inpatient labor, delivery, and post-partum care, the hospital will be required to respond to the following question: • Question: Does your hospital or health system participate in a Statewide and/or National Perinatal Quality Improvement Collaborative Program aimed at improving maternal outcomes during inpatient labor, delivery and post-partum care, and has implemented patient safety practices or bundles related to maternal morbidity to address complications, including, but not limited to, hemorrhage, severe hypertension/preeclampsia or sepsis?
• Answer Choices: (A) Yes, (B) No, or (C) N/A (our hospital does not provide inpatient labor/delivery care) Clarifying Information: Examples of Statewide or National Perinatal QI collaboratives include the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative and the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM).

When answering the Maternal Morbidity Structural measure, please note that there are two parts to this measure’s question.
Both parts of the measure’s question have to be considered by hospitals when determining which answer choice is appropriate.

For example, part one of the question assesses a hospital’s participation in a Statewide and/or National Perinatal QI collaborative.

Part two of the question assesses a hospital’s implementation of patient safety practices and/or bundles related to maternal morbidity from the QI collaboratives.
In order to select “(A) Yes”, a hospital must be able to answer yes to both parts of the question.

If a hospital deems a response of no to either part of the question, then their attestation for the entire question must be “(B) No”.
Hospitals that do not provide inpatient labor and delivery care services, would select “(C) N/A (our hospital does not provide inpatient labor/delivery care).” Hospitals participating in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program must answer the questions during the CMS specified time period.