316usman/thematic2c huggingface dataset:
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640733836.pdf (Australia)
Submission on Government’s Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill To put it plain and simply, I feel threatened by some of the amendments proposed by the Government’s Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill.

As a young Christian woman with strong beliefs and a black-and-white view of many issues, I am concerned that some of the new amendments will cause more discrimination than it will supposedly prevent.
I agree with Former NSW Chief Justice James Spigelman who believes the new laws could threaten true freedom of speech and freedom of religion in Australia.

I strongly believe that laws should restrict hate speech and protect people's dignity against assault and group-directed attacks but I don’t think it is right to extend this over protecting people's feelings against mere ‘offence’.
We cannot all have the same view about every issue and to say that some cannot voice their own opinions for fear of causing “offence” is to curb the freedom our country tries hard to protect.

As mentioned in Spigelman’s speech, unlike existing s 18C (or its replacement by the new s 51), there is no element of objectivity, as found in the words “reasonably likely to offend”.

The new Bill, therefore, appears to contain a subjective test of being offended.
None of Australia’s international treaty obligations require us to protect any person or group from being offended.

We are, however, obliged to protect freedom of speech.

We should take care not to put ourselves in a position where others could reasonably assert that we are in breach of our international treaty obligations to protect freedom of speech.

Take for example my views on homosexuality as a Christian.
I try hard to express my views in a sensitive manner although I strongly believe homosexual relations are wrong.

Although I do not condone hate speech at all, I still believe I have a right to express my opinions without fear of offending someone and therefore being prosecuted by the law.

As outlined by ACL, and in agreeing with them, if discrimination is defined to include behaviour that “offends or insults” it will invariably increase the likelihood of vexatious claims.
It also moves the onus of proving there was no unlawful discrimination to the respondent if a complainant establishes prima facie a case, leading to concerns of nuisance claims.

Some amendments fail to outline the importance of balancing the right to non- discrimination with other human rights including religious freedom and freedom of association.
Many churches and other religious organisations are small and poorly equipped to deal with an increase of regulation and complaints, which may come with the new Bill.

Please consider my concerns, which are probably better articulated by James Spigelman and ACL, and the negative impact that these amendments may have to other important values including freedom of speech and freedom of religion – as they are all interwoven.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640765059.pdf (Australia)
Basically we are against any tightening or increase of anti discrimination or vilification laws, indeed we would like them loosened & decreased.

These sorts of laws are basically the Government ie.

“Big Brother” telling individuals what they should think, say or believe.

They are an imposition on free speech, freedom of conscience & freedom of religion.

Such laws have caused problems in some of our States & other nations like UK.
Minorities who are covered by such laws have used them to gain power over those who disagree with their way of life, their culture or even religion.

It is a fact that in UK homosexual groups have targeted & prosecuted businesses that for religious reasons did not want 2 people of the same sex or 2 unmarried people sharing a bed.

Where were the rights of the business owners??

Why can’t individuals decide what they personally think , & who they want to have living in their holiday camps/homes.etc.
A good case in point is the CYC Philip Island camp.

We note there are exemptions for religious bodies but know that could easily be changed in the future – it has in other places.

We believe Aged Care Facilities should not be forced to have homosexual residents.

This could be embarrassing & awkward for other existing residents – what about their rights??

We truly think there is far too much ‘political correctness’ which basically takes away freedom of speech, thought & religion.
There can never be a situation where everyone has equal rights because one person’s right can take away another’s rights.

CYC Philip Island Camp for example.

That was a clear case where the law said people should to do something against their religion & conscience – where were their rights??

The problem when it comes to implementing such laws is that what one person sees as discrimination or offense may not be the intention.
When it goes to court it can be very difficult & costly to prove & particularly to argue for religious conviction.

Please do not implement the proposed changes
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640790575.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Rewards for the Apprehension of Criminals (CAP.

382 1 CHAPTER 382 T H E REWARDS FOR T H E APPREHENSION O F CRIMINALS ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Rewards for apprehension of persons charged with treason or felony.

3.

Amount of reward.

4.

Payment of reward.

REWARDS FOR T H E APPREHENSION O F CRIMINALS (1st March, 1882.)

411881.

S.R.O.

2211956.

1.

This Act may be cited as the Rewards for the Short title- Apprehension of Criminals Act.

2.
2.

It shall be lawful for the Governor-General to pro- :;;zn@;n of claim and offer a reward for the apprehension of any person persons charged charged in due form according to law with having committed with treason the crime of high treason, murder, or any other felony.

felony.

3.

The amount and the conditions of such rewards Amount of reward.
shall be in the discretion of the Governor-General, but the amount shall not in any case exceed the sum of four hundred and eighty dollars for each and every person to be apprehended: LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 2 CAP.

382) Rewards for the Apprehension of Criminals Payment of reward.
Provided that, if there shall be any question as to the person or persons entitled under the provisions of this Act to receive any such award, and if there be more than one persgn, then as to the proportion of the reward to which each is entitled, the same shall be determined by the Governor-General whose decision shall be final.

4.
If shall be lawful for the Governor-General, on the apprehension of any person for whose apprehension any reward shall have been offered under the authority of this Act, by warrant under his hand directed to the Accountant- General or other proper officer to draw from the public money of Antigua and Barbuda the amount so proclaimed and offered; and the production of such warrant shall be a full and sufficient voucher for the payment by the Accountant- General, or other proper officer of the amount so drawn.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640792750.pdf (Australia)
I am writing with great concern about the Human Rights and Anti- Discrimination Bill which I believe is a threat to the freedom of expression held dear by Australians.

What price being free to think if we cannot toss those thoughts about among ourselves and others?

Most of us would never intentionally offend somebody, but this is life - offence happens and we just have to get on with it.
The concept of being guilty until proven innocent immediately gives the upper hand to a devout liar accusing an innocent person of causing offence, and using this law to horrendously offend that innocent person - albeit indirectly.

A very sneaky backhand kind of offence which could become legal.

Perhaps Nicola Roxon could find something a little more positive to pour her talents into - it would truly be a terrible legacy for her to leave this bill behind when she exits parliament.

Celia McCoy
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640795954.pdf (Australia)
Dear Secretary I write to oppose the Human Rights and Anti-discrimination Bill.

I am making the following submission to the Committee: 1.

I believe the Bill severely restricts FREEDOM OF SPEECH, as people can so easily be "offended" over an issue.

This means, I assume, that they could take legal action.

2.

I am concerned that those who will potentially handle such cases, could take on a "big brother" role.

It sounds like a mine field to me with so many potential levels of "offense".
The courts, already over committed would have so many more cases with which to deal.

Yours faithfully Edwin Holt
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640808599.pdf (Australia)
The Clerk of the Committee.

Dear Sir/Madam, There are several anti-discrimination laws in the ACT and in other States which mean a person may not discriminate re a person’s sexual orientation.

If Marriage happened to be redefined I believe many people in the public, as well as those in business could by at the risk of receiving complaints if they had religious beliefs which were different from the proposed changes in the Marriage Act.
For seventeen years’ groups, have assembled and prayed outside the ACT Health Building where abortions are performed.

Groups and individuals were respectful and spoke to anyone who approached- no one from the group reached out to passers-by or to those entering the building.

Legislation was passed in the ACT to prevent these peaceful gatherings.

A restricted area was marked out.

Some people have been fined for praying silently in the restricted area.
This has put the Police under some pressure to decide, by whatever means possible, who is “praying” – if a person is “praying”.

Police have several duties, but this is an imposition on their precious time and is hardly allowing freedom of movement and or religion.

The Human Rights Commission has been active in Queensland and has shown by its treatment of students at QUT, that discrimination is alive and well.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other International Covenants recognise the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

There are other examples of which I am sure you are aware.

Please bring some common sense back into the law in this area.

Yours faithfully, B. Cains.

Inquiry into the status of the human right to freedom of religion or beliefSubmission 141
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640824334.pdf (Australia)
Submission to the Inquiry into the use of the Quinoline anti- malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence Force.

st My name is Paul Gleeson, and I served with the 1 Australian Regiment from 1999 – 2006.

In 2000 I deployed to East Timor as part of 1RAR and was apart of the Mefloquine vs Tafenoquine Anti-malaria trials.

These are my recollections.


Battalion of the Royal (ii) identifying and reporting adverse drug reactions from Quinoline anti-malarial drugs The first Term of reference I would like to address is among ADF personnel; I believe that the participants on the trial were reluctant to come forward with adverse reactions to the drugs because we were told by the Commanding Officer of the Unit (LTCol John Calagari), before we started the trial, that “if we didn’t take it ( the trial drugs) we weren’t going.
(Deploying)” Therefore Soldiers didn’t want to report any adverse reactions for fear of being sent home to Australia or non-deployment.

I heard him say those words on 2 separate occasions to gathered bodies of Soldiers, before we left.

That left no doubt in my mind, and others, that to not participate in the trial would mean that we weren’t going to deploy to East Timor.

This also ties in with f) any other related matters.
The idea that the Trial conducted with The First Battalion, of the Royal Australian Regiment, in East Timor in 2000-2001 was a Voluntary trial is false.

As pointed out previously, we were told that if we didn’t participate in the trial we weren’t deploying to East Timor.

That was made clear to us and we believed what we were told by the Hierarchy.

Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence ForceSubmission 79
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640829577.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Public Authorities Protection (CAP.

352 1 CHAPTER 352 THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES PROTECTION ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Action, etc., against any person in respect ofact done in execution of duty.

3.

Effect on certain Acts.

PUBLIC AUTHORITIES PROTECTION 1.

This Act may be cited as the Public Authorities short title.

Protection Act.

2.
Protection Act.

2.

Where any action, prosecution, or other proceeding ti4; :G3 is commenced against any person for any act done in pur- person in respect suance or execution or intended execution of any Act or of of act done in any public duty or authority or of any alleged neglect or duty.
default in the execution of any such act, duty, or authority, the following provisions shall have effect: execution of (a) The action, prosecution, or proceeding shall not lie or be instituted unless it is commenced within six months next after the act, neglect or default complained of, or, in case of a continuance of injury or damage, within six months next after the ceasing thereof.
( 6 ) Wherever in any such action a judgment is ob- tained by the defendant, it shall carry costs to be taxed as between solicitor and client.

2 C A P .

352) Public Authoritzes Protection LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA (c) Where the proceeding is an action for damages, tender of amends before the action was commenced may, in lieu of or in addition to any other plea, be pleaded.
If the action was commenced after the tender, or is pro- ceeded with after payment into Court of any money in satisfaction of the plaintiffs claim, and the plaintiff does not recover more than the sum tendered or paid, he shall not recover any costs incurred after the tender or payment, and the defendant shall be entitled to costs, to be taxed as between solicitor and client, as from the time of the tender or payment: but this provision shall not affect costs on any injunction in the action; (d) If, in the opinion of the Court, the plaintiff has not given the defendant a sufficient opportunity of tendering amends before the commencement of the pro- ceeding the Court may award to the defendant costs to be taxed as between solicitor and client.
This section shall not affect any proceedings by the Crown.

Effect on certain Acts.

3.


There shall be repealed so much of any Act as enacts that in any proceeding to which this Act applies- (a) The proceeding is to be commenced in any par- ticular place; or ( b ) The proceeding is to be commenced within any particular time; or ( c ) Notice of action is to be given; or (d) The defendant is to be entitled to any particular kind or amount of costs, or the plaintiff is to be deprived of costs in any specified event; or ( e ) The defendant may plead the general issue.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640829677.pdf (Australia)
THE SENATE LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS REFERENCES COMMITTEE The adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regime PUBLIC HEARING Tuesday 9 November 2021 Committee Room 2S3 Parliament House, Canberra Time Witness 9.00 am Panel: AML Experts (Submission 6) Initialism Pty Ltd (Submission 8) Arctic Intelligence (Submission 12) 10.00 am Panel: Police Federation of Australia (Submission 20) Mr John Chevis 11.00 am Morning tea 11.15 am Dr John Coyne, Strategic Policing and Law Enforcement, Australian Strategic Policy Institute (Submission 10) 12.00 pm Lunch 1.45 pm Transparency International Australia (via videoconference and in person) (Submission 17) 2.30 pm Australian Banking Association (via videoconference) (Submission 22) 3.15 pm Afternoon tea 3.30 pm Panel: Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CAANZ) (via videoconference) (Submission 5) Institute of Public Accountants (Submission 9) Financial Planning Association of Australia (via videoconference) (Submission 11) CPA Australia (via videoconference) (Submission 37) 4.30 pm Adjournment Committee Secretary: Sophie Dunstone PO Box 6100, Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: +61 2 6277 3560 Email: legcon.sen@aph.gov.au Internet: www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640834779.pdf (Australia)
Hi, I am writing in regards to the Greens Anti-Terrorism Laws Reform Bill.

I support for the Anti-Terrorism Laws Reform Bill and its amendments in general.

I support for the Green’s Bill to pass through Parliament first, before any consideration is given to the Attorney-General’s proposals for amendments.

I support for the repeal of the sedition offences because they can be applied in a discriminatory way.
I support for the proposed amendments to the definition of “terrorist act”, because the current definition allows individuals to be targeted and charged on the basis of their religious or political beliefs.

I support for the repeal of the offence of ‘possessing things connected to a terrorist act’ and the offence of ‘association with a terrorist organisations or its members’.
I support for the repeal of the presumption against bail for terrorism offences, and the ‘dead time’ provision for excluding investigative periods for police detention (which was used to detain Dr. Haneef).

However, there are two areas where the report does not go far enough: The system for banning ‘terrorist organisations’ should be repealed altogether as it is an arbitrary and draconian measure.
The ASIO compulsory questioning powers should also be repealed because they undermine personal freedoms and create unwarranted anxiety and fear.

Thank you for considering my views.

Regards, Kaled Elhassan
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640839814.pdf (Australia)
As regards the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill, I am against this bill as I believe it to be a threat to our freedom of speech, freedom of association, and freedom of religion, as well as being against natural justice.

It should be rejected.

I find it quite appalling that the accused party has to prove his/her innocence.

This completely reverses the onus of proof so that the basic principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is violated.
This means that anyone can bring any sort of malicious accusation against any other party simply because the accuser has a minor score to settle.

Religious freedom should be upheld at all costs, so that any member of any religion can express disagreement with any other religion without fear of being labeled as a criminal.

This is all part of a robust democracy which encourages robust debate.

No one has a right not to be offended – we all, however, have the right to defend our beliefs and principles.
Yours sincerely Christine Elam
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640867723.pdf (Australia)
FACEBOOK - Religious bigotry and misinformation drive anti-halal campaigns Stickers sold by Mike Holt of Restore Australia.

He tells people to ‘plaster them everywhere’ and advises them to deny posting the stickers if they get caught.

Boycott Halal Certification in Australia makes outrageous claims about certified businesses and encourages people to contact them with abuse.

Boycott Halal in Australia, warning Australian businesses that they intend to close them down.

They harass businesses relentlessly.


Boycott Halal in Australia’s proposal for compulsory labelling.

Yes, they’re serious.

Pauline Hanson, confusing the value of halal certified goods with certification fees, a miniscule amount by comparison.

She asks ‘where does all the money go?’ Misinformation is rampant.
Third party certification of foodSubmission 1333 - Attachment 1 Q Society’s anti-halal campaigner (Kirralie Smith, Halal Choices) would deny Australian businesses the economic benefits of halal certification.

(Picture from a Q Society video currently before the courts for alleged defamation of an Australian halal certifier.)
Q Society and other halal boycott campaigners want mandatory labelling of halal certified foods so they can more effectively target and boycott business which have halal certified products.

Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer, invited to Australia by Q Society.

Spencer is a US anti-Islam blogger and Q Society board member.

Geller’s US anti-Islam groups are classified as hate groups by a US law centre.

Do we want these people influencing Australian food trade policy?
Geert Wilders was banned from entering government buildings in WA when he was last here.

He’ll be back soon to launch Q Society’s party, Australian Liberty Alliance.

Cory Bernardi met with him in Europe.

This inquiry seems to have been called by a few politicians who take instructions from an Australian hate group.

Third party certification of foodSubmission 1333 - Attachment 1
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640873338.pdf (Australia)
Good afternoon, I would like to voice my objection to the anti discrimination bill.

It would tighten the screws on free speech so much that not even a mouse would be permitted to squeak.

Actually the bill offends me.

Does that mean I can take the perpetrators to court under the bill's provisions?

See how stupid its regulations are?

Yours, in the hope that commonsense will prevail, Peter Kriewaldt
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640878034.pdf (Australia)
Gender- based abortion is anti-female and discriminatory.

It has been used in China to the detriment of the Chinese population...they now have a great abundance of Chinese males and hardly any Chinese females because a great majority of females have been aborted in favour of the desired male children.

To ask the public to pay for this type of designer fertility is immoral and I strongly oppose the use of public funds to decimate the female population of Australia.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640895412.pdf (Australia)
Secretary Re the inquiry into the adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti- money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regime.

Re term of reference (i) I fairly recently asked Austrac where they consider money to be located, because it, at least legal money, now largely exists as an electronic “blip on a chip”.
Is it located at the physical address of a bank or financial institution, even though that may be nothing more than an office behind a brass plate on a building, is it located at the physical address of an “associate bank”, eg.

an Australian bank holding records of a bank in the Cook Islands, or is located wherever the server is which contains the blip on a chip?

It seems to be important to consider this when we say money has been transferred.
Is it where the blip is physically, or is it deemed to be somewhere else, such as a jurisdiction with secrecy or low tax?

Eg.

Is the money transferred from Australia considered to be in the US where a server might be housed, or is it considered to be in say, the Seychelles?

Thank you Geoff Taylor, Perth The adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regimeSubmission 47
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640943574.pdf (Australia)
SUBMISSION to Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee on a Draft Anti-Discrimination Bill I would like to register my disapproval of the recommended changes to the Anti-Discrimination Bill as proposed by Minister Nicola Roxon.

I particularly am uncomfortable with the new inclusions of prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.
Where I see this as a problem is in the cases of religious institutions, Commonwealth-funded church-run aged care and schools who exist because in this country we have freedom enshrined into our constitution the capacity of each citizen to believe according to one’s conscience.

Even though some of these areas are proposed as exceptions, examples abound overseas where organisations/single citizens have taken exception to employment rules established at one of these institutions for good reasons.
Consequently, religious organisations and schools have been fined etc if they do not immediately comply to employment of those they do not in conscience feel are suitable for their organisation.

Therefore we will lose our freedoms in this country which have been so carefully given to us by very wise people man years ago.

I ask that there be no further erosion of the rights of our citizens in the ways proposed.

Yours sincerely Nola Drum
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640951924.pdf (Australia)
Submission: Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence Force Dear Sir/Madam, I was an Australian Army Mefloquine trial subject in 2001.

This trial sent a wrecking ball through my life at the ripe old age of 20.
I have effectively been assessed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) as Totally and Permanently Incapacitated for work (TPI) due to ongoing mental health problems since I was eventually medically discharged from the military in November 2005.

I have already submitted to the Senate inquiry into Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel.

I found the effort that went into that submission caused a great deal of distress to myself and my loved ones.
For detailed information about my experience with Mefloquine toxicity and my inability to gain adequate treatment, please see my earlier Senate Suicide Submission #319 on the following link: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Foreign _Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/VeteranSuicide/Submissions I have little faith in the ability of this Senate inquiry to hold the perpetrators of these neurotoxic drug trials to account.
I believe one reason impeding natural justice is the fact that the dysfunctional and defective government we are lumped with have ignored Senate recommendations re Veteran suicide and ADF Mental health in the past, and they belong to the very political party that approved the trials and accepted particularly generous donations from Tafenoquine developers Smithkline Beecham International ($45000) and Glaxo Smith Kline Australia Pty Ltd ($45000) in 2000-2001, at the very time these drug trials were taking place.
(Image attached.

Source: http://democracyforsale.net/search-aec/ ) We need a Royal Commission because they’re unlikely to put themselves into prison.

Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence ForceSubmission 93 Kind regards, Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence ForceSubmission 93
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640962783.pdf (Australia)
Roche supplementary information for Senate inquiry into “Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence Force” Mefloquine was approved in Australia on 3 September 1986 by the Commonwealth Department of Health.

Roche notes that there are some differences in dates for mefloquine’s availability in Australia quoted in various submissions.
This reflects the introduction of the Therapeutic Good Act 1989 and the requirement for products to be listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG).

After the commencement of the legislation, products already approved and on the market were grandfathered into the ARTG.

On the 27 January 1993, mefloquine was grandfathered into the ARTG.

Mefloquine had indications for treatment and prophylaxis since is original registration in 1986.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640977565.pdf (Australia)
Anti-competitive conduct in the retail wine industry and ACCC's roleSubmission 3 Anti-competitive conduct in the retail wine industry and ACCC's roleSubmission 3
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640936710.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
C E L E B R A T I N G 1 2 0 Y E A R S O F P A H O Looking forward, leaving no one behind.
JANUARY 29 30 World Leprosy Day World Neglected Tropical Diseases Day MARCH MAY 4 15 World Cancer Day International Childhood Cancer Day FEBRUARY 3 4 8 9 4-11 22 24 World Birth Defects Day World Obesity Day International Women's Day World Kidney Day Salt Awareness Week World Water Day World Tuberculosis Day World Health Day 7 World Chagas Disease Day 14 23-29 Vaccination Week in the Americas 25 28 World Malaria Day World Day for Safety and Health at Work APRIL 5 8-14 12 15 17 21 21-30 28 31 World Hand Hygiene Day & International Day of the Midwife 7th UN Global Road Safety Week & Caribbean Mosquito Awareness Week International Nurses Day International Day of Families World Hypertension Day World Breastfeeding Protection Day 76th World Health Assembly International Day of Action for Women’s Health World No Tobacco Day Caribbean Nutrition Day World Environment Day World Food Safety Day World Blood Donor Day World Elder Abuse Awareness Day 1 5 7 14 15 26-30 PAHO’s 172nd Session of the Executive Committee International Day Against Drug Abuse 26 JUNE JULY 25 28 World Drowning Prevention Day World Hepatitis Day SEPTEMBER NOVEMBER 1-7 9 12 19 World Breastfeeding Week International Day of the World's Indigenous People International Youth Day World Humanitarian Day AUGUST Childhood Cancer Awareness Month International Day of Clean Air for Blue Skies Caribbean Wellness Day World Suicide Prevention Day 7 9 10 9-15 Wellness Week in the Americas 17 18-24 Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Week World Patient Safety Day 25-29 28 29 in Latin America PAHO’s 60th Directing Council/75th Session of the Regional Committee of WHO for the Americas World Rabies Day World Heart Day Breast Cancer Awareness Month OCTOBER International Day of the Elderly Inter-American Water Day World Mental Health Day International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction World Hospice and Palliative Care Day World Sight Day World Handwashing Day 1 7 10 13 14 14 15 16-22 Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Week in the Caribbean International Lead Poisoning Prevention Week 22-28 World Polio Day 24 World Stroke Day 29 Malaria Day in the Americas Diabetes Day World Day of Prematurity 6 14 17 18-24 World Antimicrobial Awareness Week 19 19 World Toilet Day World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women 25 DECEMBER 25 Nov – 10 Dec 16 Days of Action for the Elimination of Violence against Women 1 2 3 10 12 World AIDS Day 121st Anniversary of PAHO International Day of Persons with Disabilities Human Rights Day Universal Health Day 2023 www.paho.org •�525 23rd St. N.W.
Washington DC 20037 2023
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697640999718.pdf (Australia)
Appendix 2 Anti – Dumping provisions as an anti-competitive tool Steel First has done some number-crunching on the trade cases initiated and closed last year, as well as those with a decision still pending at December 31, 2015.

Initiated cases in 2015 Australia was clearly the most active initiator of trade cases last year.

This is somewhat ironic, considering the country's small share of global steel production.
It produced 4.542 million tonnes of crude steel in January-November 2015, compared with 16.789 million tonnes in Mexico and 73.139 million tonnes in the USA in the same period - the second and third most active initiators of trade cases in 2015.

The production figures are based on the latest data available from the World Steel Assn (Worldsteel).

Source: Steel First The future of Australia's steel industrySubmission 24 - Attachment 2
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641017579.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA By-Laws (Printing of False Copies) (CAP.

66 1 CHAPTER 66 THE BY-LAWS (PRINTING OF FALSE COPIES) ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Penalty for printing false copies.

BY-LAWS (PRINTING O F FALSE COPIES) (25th February, 192 1 .)

1311921.

S.R.O.

2211956.

1.

This Act may be cited as the By-Laws (Printing S h o ~ of False Copies) Act.

2.
2.

Any person who- (a) prints any paper which falsely purports to be a copy of a By-law, or, (b) tenders in evidence any such paper falsely pur- porting to be a copy of a By-law knowing the same to be false shall be guilty of felony and on conviction shall be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years with or without hard labour.

Penalty for printing false
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641025831.pdf (Australia)
We believe that the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill should be rejected, as it undermines free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of associatiuon and natural justice.

Michael & Meryl Stathis
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641038597.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Gazette (Authorization) (CAP.

187 1 CHAPTER 187 T H E GAZETTE (AUTHORIZATION) ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Name of printer to be affixed.

3 .

Penalty for printing false copies.

GAZETTE (AUTHORIZATION) (20th April, 1915.)

411915.

S.R.O.

2211956.

1.

This Act may be cited as the Gazette (Authoriza- short title.

tion) Act.

2.
tion) Act.

2.

All printed copies of the Gazette shall have imprinted :;pee ;ii,pfF at the end the name of the printer who printed the same with the words "by authority" added thereafter.

3.

Any person who- Penalty for printing false (a) prints any paper which falsely purports to be "pies.
a duly authorized copy of the Gazette, or ( 6 ) tenders in evidence any such paper falsely pur- porting to be the Gazette, knowing that the same was not duly printed and published, shall be guilty of felony and on conviction be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years with or without hard labour.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641039546.pdf (Australia)
ASSISTANCE CONTACT INFORMATION Open Arms – Veterans and Families Counselling 1800 011 046 www.openarms.gov.au Lifeline 13 11 14 (24 hour crisis hotline) www.lifeline.org.au Mensline Australia 1300 78 99 78 www.mensline.org.au x
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641075599.pdf (Australia)
Reference: Senate inquiry into the use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine, in the Australian Defence Force (ADF).

Date: 22nd October 2018 I have lived with my partner for the last 11 years and in that time, I have seen both her mental and physical health deteriorate.

I met my partner in 2007 and within 3-5 years her mental and physical health spiralled out of control.

All of her 36 health issues have never properly diagnosed or treated.
All of these issues combined have caused significant damage to both our lives, with no assistance from any Medical professionals or counsellors.

We struggle emotionally, physically, socially and financially.

Out of necessity and desperation we packed up our lives in Regional WA and moved to Victoria in the hope of finding some Medical professionals and other experts to help to get our lives back to some sense of normality.

Living with someone with so many health issues is difficult most of the time.
I feel like I am forever walking on egg shells.

I can never really say what I think or what I need to say.

This creates built up tension within me and causes me to become very stressed and emotional.

After working a 12-hour day and coming home to someone who is either asleep or angry is definitely not ideal.

My partner goes from being happy to being very irritated in the blink of an eye.

Something so insignificant regularly tips her over the edge.
As hard as it is for me to witness, I can’t fathom how difficult it must be for the person living it.

My job is quite stressful at times, so after a full-on day at work, coming home to someone in a poor mental state is very testing.

My partner is constantly saying how guilty she feels that she can’t work.

Even though she is medically retired, this still doesn’t alleviate the magnitude of her health issues.

This very much frustrates her and there isn’t much I can say to ease her mind.
This sends her into a deep depression.

She often wonders what the point to life is when her living standards all the time are so poor.

Maintaining a good health plan with the various medical specialists required to keep my partner as mentally and physically well as is possible is a full-time job, and this alone fatigues her incredibly.

If our relationship wasn’t strong, I know that we wouldn’t have stayed together this long.
My partner's determination to resolve her mental and physical issues encouraged me to stay in her life.

I also know that if I wasn’t in her life, more than likely she would have taken her own life.

Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence ForceSubmission 129
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641077558.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
THE AEDES AEGYPTI MOSQUITO POSSIBLE BREEDING SITES PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Dengue is transmitted by the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which can be found in and around your home.

-Drums/barrels -Uncovered cisterns/tanks PHYSICAL CONTROL: -Cover drums and tanks tightly with mesh or fabric -Only the female mosquito bites and sucks blood therefore, only the females carry diseases.

-One female mosquito can live on an average of six weeks.
She can lay approximately 300 eggs in one container This mosquito lays its eggs on the side of water holding containers, above the water line.

Eggs hatch when submerged in water.

Within 7-10 days the mosquito can complete its life cycle.

Destroy larvae breeding in stored water, to help reduce the mosquito population in your community and to reduce the risk of exposure to Dengue, Chikungunya and Zika.
-Discarded buckets and other containers -Bottles -Flower pots -Old tires -Discarded tin cans -Pet dishes -Construction blocks -Garden containers & tools -Tree holes - Roof gutter holding leaves and debris -Plant in a vase with water -Bromeliads -Get rid of unused containers and old appliances -Clean pet dishes & vases every 2-3 days -Fill tree holes and ground depressions with soil MECHANICAL CONTROL: -Fit all doors and windows with screens -Use mosquito nets over cribs and beds BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: -Add larvivorous fish to cisterns and artificial ponds PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CONTROL: -Wear light colored clothing -Wear long sleeve clothing CHEMICAL CONTROL: -Use aerosol insecticide spray in your home -Apply deet and other repellents to the skin -Mosquito coils SMALL BI TE BIG THREAT!
For more information Contact CBH CHI Office (268) 462-2936 Complaints Line: (268) 562-9300 Fax (268) 460-5992 centralboardofhealthantiguaandbarbuda Email: chi_cbheh@yahoo.com JOI N THE MOSQUITO FIGHT For Medical Advice AND LESSEN THE BITES!

Visit your Community Health Center MINISTRY OF HEALTH CENTRAL BOARD OF HEALTH ST. JOHN’S, ANTIGUA & BARBUDA PROTECT ALL WATER CATCHMENTS FROM MOSQUITO BREEDING
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641079638.pdf (Australia)
Anti-CSG points included the serious health impacts on humans, animals and wildlife reported in Queensland and the US, as well as the risk of "depleting and contaminating ground and surface water" Watch you are already destroying peoples land and lives!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q65F9JteQo
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641111628.pdf (Australia)
To the Senate inquiry into use of the Quinoline Anti Malarials Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the ADF.

I am writing this as a supplementary to my original Submission Number 91 David Madsen.

I have just received my documents from AMI regarding the 4RAR Drug Trials on Operation Tanager.

East Timor.

2001 The documents I have been supplied contained.

1.

A letter from Air Marshal Tracy Smart.

2.

Mid Trial Checklist.

3.

End of Trial checklist.

4.


Some medical notes for some minor injuries I had while on tour.

(Completely unrelated to drug trial).

Air Marshal claims I was in the control group for Doxy and that there was some incorrect notes on my mid Trial and End of trial symptom checklists (its important to note in my original submission i state that I took Mefloquine loading dose and was withdrawn from the trial because i went to my RAP and reported vivid violent nightmares and developed cystic acne on my back).
I will attach my trial docs so you may confirm the following.

1.

On the mid trial symptom checklist it states under symptom skin irritation mild acne on back, worse on Mefloquine.

2.

On my end of trial Checklist at the top, it States STARTED ON MEFLOQUINE.

And then someone has scribbled it out.

I have two concerns with this.

1.


Someone has altered these documents to hide the fact that I was given Mefloquine which means that should I decide to face DVA again i will find it difficult to prove I was given loading dose.

Also I believe that by doing this the trial results have been manipulate the trial results effectively hiding the fact that I had adverse reaction to Mefloquine before I even left Australia.
Please consider this supplementary submission as a true reflection of my experience of Mefloquine.

Thank you for considering my submission.

David Madsen.

Use of the Quinoline anti-malarial drugs Mefloquine and Tafenoquine in the Australian Defence ForceSubmission 91 - Supplementary Submission 1
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641119974.pdf (Australia)
The adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regimeSubmission 52
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641156015.pdf (Australia)
I am totally against the human rights and anti-discrimination bill proposed by Nicola Roxon.
Australians have continually had their right to free speech whittled away over the last 30 years and it is now getting that bad that our forefathers would no longer recognise this country as Australia, there has already been too much damage done to the rights of ordinary Australians by well meaning government laws, to criticise where criticism is needed or a slip of the tongue would be at the risk of a severe fine or gaol.
THERE WAS ONCE AN OLD SAYING THAT SEEMS TO BE FORGOTTEN NOWADAYS: “STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAL MY BONES BUT NAMES CAN NEVER HURT ME!” Mary Allison,
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641165662.pdf (Australia)
National Anti-Corruption Commission Bills 2022Submission 38 - Supplementary Submission National Anti-Corruption Commission Bills 2022Submission 38 - Supplementary Submission
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641184846.pdf (Australia)
Dear Secretariat I understand that the submissions have closed for the above inquiry .

How ever, I w anted to bring our submission to Senate Select Committee inquiry into Australia into a Financial and Technology Centre to this committee's attention insofar as it relates to the AML/CTF regime: https://www.aph .gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=6181bfdd-2b0d-49e5-ab68- 4f141f8a04f4&subld=711361 (see recommendation 10, page 19 of 20).
W e have no further comments to add to this but if the committee have any questions, please let me know .

Best, AML Or AARON M. LANE Lecturer in Law Coordinator, Business Law Group I Graduate School of Business and Law Research Fellow I RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub RM IT University SSRN I Google Scholar I Linkedln I RMIT The adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regimeSubmission 46
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641292922.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE NON-CITIZENS LAND HOLDING REGULATION (BAU PANEL SYSTEMS ANTIGUA LIMITED) (EXEMPTION) ORDER, 2012 2012, No.

44 [Published in the Official Gazette Vol.

XXXII No.73 dated 27th December, 2012] ________ Printed at the Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda, by Ralph George, Acting Government Printer — By Authority, 2012.

800—12.12 [Price $1.90] The Non-Citizens Land Holding Regulation (Bau Panel Systems Antigua Limited) (Exemption) Order, 2012 2 2012, No.

44 2012, No.
44 2012, No.

44 3 The Non-Citizens Land Holding Regulation (Bau Panel Systems Antigua Limited) (Exemption) Order, 2012 THE NON-CITIZENS LAND HOLDING REGULATION (BAU PANEL SYSTEMS ANTIGUA LIMITED) (EXEMPTION) ORDER, 2012 ARRANGEMENT Order 1.

Short title.

2.

Exemption from payment of Stamp Duty.

The Non-Citizens Land Holding Regulation (Bau Panel Systems Antigua Limited) (Exemption) Order, 2012 4 2012, No.
44 ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE NON-CITIZENS LAND HOLDING REGULATION (BAU PANEL SYSTEMS ANTIGUA LIMITED) (EXEMPTION) ORDER, 2012 2012, No.

44 THE NON-CITIZENS LAND HOLDING REGULATIONS (BAU PANEL SYSTEMS ANTIGUA LIMITED) (EXEMPTION) ORDER made by the Governor-General in exercise of the powers conferred on her by section 23 of the Non-Citizens Land Holding Regulations Act, Cap.

293.

1.
293.

1.

Short title This Order may be cited as the Non-citizens Land Holding Regulation (Bau Panel Systems Antigua Limited) (Exemption) Order, 2012.

2.

Exemption from payment of Stamp Duty Bau Panel Systems Antigua Limited is by this Order exempted from the payment of the stamp duties payable under section 18 of the Non-citizens Land Holding Regulation Act, Cap.
293 in connection with the implementation of the Agreement dated 3rd July, 2012 between the Government of Antigua and Barbuda and Bau Panel Systems Antigua Limited.

Made the 14th day of December, 2012.

Dame Louise Agnetha Lake-Tack, Governor-General.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697641295235.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2020 STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2020, No.

9 [Published in the Official Gazette Vol.

XL No.

8 dated 13th February, 2020.]

Printed at the Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda, by Noel F. Abraham, Acting Government Printer — By Authority, 2020.

300—03.20 [Price: $1.90] The Non-Citizens Undeveloped Land (Declaration of Undeveloped 2 2020, No.

9 Land) Order, 2020.

2020, No.


9 3 The Non-Citizens Undeveloped Land (Declaration of Undeveloped Land) Order, 2020.

THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2020 ARRANGEMENT Order 1.

Short title.

2.

Declaration of undeveloped land SCHEDULE The Non-Citizens Undeveloped Land (Declaration of Undeveloped 4 2020, No.

9 Land) Order, 2020.

ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2020 2020, No.
9 THE NON-CITIZENS UNDEVELOPED LAND (DECLARATION OF UNDEVELOPED LAND) ORDER, 2020 made in exercise of the powers contained in section 4 of the Non-citizens Undeveloped Land Tax Act, Cap.

294 1.

Short title This Order may be cited as the Non-citizens Undeveloped Land (Declaration of Undeveloped Land) Order, 2020.

2.

Declaration of undeveloped land The parcels of land specified in the Schedule hereto is declared to be undeveloped land for the purposes of the Non-citizens Undeveloped Land Tax Act, Cap.
294.

SCHEDULE Owner Registration Section Block No.

Parcel No.

Acreage Peter Leeming and Five Islands 54 1292A 64 0.6 acre Margaret Leeming Anne Michelle Armitage St. Phillips South 32 2886A 163 0.182 acre Terence H. D. Horsley Hodges Bay & 43 2197B 132 0.39 acre Thibou’s Made the 12th day of February, 2020.

Hon.

Charles H. Fernandez, Minister of Tourism, Economic Development, and Investment.