Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1698929559154.pdf (New Zealand)
Employment Relations Amendment Bill Government Bill Explanatory note General policy statement This Bill amends the Employment Relations Act 2000 to implement Government policy on trial employment periods for new employees of small and medium sized businesses, and to support Government policy on KiwiSaver that is being enacted through amendments to the KiwiSaver Act 2006.

Trial periods The Bill enables employers in small and medium sized businesses to take on new employees for trial periods.
This will enable those em­ ployers to determine the employees’ suitability for permanent em­ ployment, without the risk of legal proceedings for unjustiﬁed dis­ missal in the event the employment is terminated.

Such trial periods can be particularly important for small and medium sized businesses, as they often face higher recruitment and dismissal costs relative to larger employers who have dedicated human resources departments.
Small and medium sized businesses, therefore, face higher risks in taking a chance on a new employee.

This Bill will provide opportun­ ities for those who might suffer disadvantage in the labour market, for example employees who are new to the workforce or returning 8—1 2 Employment Relations Amendment Bill Explanatory note to the workforce after some time away or speciﬁc groups at risk of negative employment outcomes.
Under the Bill, employers, who employ fewer than 20 employees, and new employees may agree to a trial period of employment of up to 90 days.

During this period, either party may terminate the em­ ployment relationship, and the employee may not raise a personal grievance on the grounds of unjustiﬁed dismissal.

Parties are still able to access mediation services, but the employee cannot take the matter further to the Employment Relations Authority or the Employ­ ment Court.
However, other types of remedies, such as remedies for discrimination, or sexual or racial harassment, will remain available to the employee if that type of behaviour has occurred.

An employer and employee may agree to a trial period only once.

If an employer decides to re­employ the employee, the option to agree to another trial period will not be available.

The option of probation­ ary employment under section 67 of the principal Act will, however, remain open in such situations.
Repeal of provisions relating to Kiwisaver The Government intends to enact separate legislation to amend the KiwiSaver Act 2006 to require that employer contributions must be on top of an employee’s existing pay when the employee joins Kiwi­ Saver.

In light of these proposals, the existing provisions in the Em­ ployment Relations Act 2000 that allow an employee to bring a per­ sonal grievance if the employee is treated on a different basis as a result of being a member of Kiwisaver are no longer required.
Re­ pealing these provisions will support the Government’s KiwiSaver policy and further reduce the potential for personal grievances.

Clause by clause analysis Clause 1 is the Title clause.

Clause 2 is the commencement clause.

The Bill is to come into force on the day after the date on which it receives the Royal assent, except for clauses 6 and 7 which come into force on 1 April 2009.
Explanatory note Employment Relations Amendment Bill 3 Part 1 Preliminary provisions Clause 3 provides that the Bill amends the Employment Relations Act 2000.

Clause 4 states the purpose of the Bill.
The purpose is— • to provide for trial periods that allow an employer, within a period no longer than 90 days, to dismiss an employee with­ out the employee being able to bring a personal grievance or legal proceedings in respect of the dismissal, subject to certain exceptions; and to repeal amendments made by the Employment Relations (Breaks, Infant Feeding, and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2008 relating to an employee’s membership of a KiwiSaver scheme or complying superannuation fund.
• Clause 5 provides that the amendments made by clauses 6 and 7 ap­ ply to employment agreements entered into only after the commence­ ment of the Bill.

Part 2 Amendments to principal Act Clause 6 amends section 67 to clarify that it applies to probationary employment agreements.

This is to distinguish them from employ­ ment agreements containing a trial provision and entered into under new section 67A.

Clause 7 inserts new sections 67A and 67B.


New section 67A provides when an employment agreement may pro­ vide for a trial period of 90 days or less in the course of which an em­ ployer can terminate the employment agreement and the employee is precluded from taking a personal grievance or bringing legal pro­ ceedings in respect of the dismissal, subject to certain exceptions.
The new section contains 2 important limitations— • the employee must not have been previously employed by the employer: • the employer must employ fewer than 20 employees.

New section 67B provides that if an employer terminates an employ­ ment agreement containing a trial period under new section 67A, then 4 Employment Relations Amendment Bill Explanatory note the employee cannot bring a personal grievance or legal proceedings in respect of the dismissal, subject to certain exceptions.
Clauses 8, 9, and 10 repeal amendments made by the Employment Relations (Breaks, Infant Feeding, and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2008, which made it a ground for a personal grievance for an employee’s employment to be adversely affected because he or she is a member of a KiwiSaver scheme or a complying superannuation fund.
Regulatory impact statement Executive summary This Bill amends the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the ERA) to implement pre­election commitments in relation to 90 day trial periods for employees and implement Government changes in rela­ tion to the KiwiSaver scheme.

Currently there are no provisions for trial periods that exclude the employee from raising a personal grievance for reasons of unjustiﬁed dismissal.
The introduction of such a trial period would encourage more businesses, especially small businesses that can ﬁnd it difﬁcult to absorb such costs, to take a risk on potential employees.

The new Government’s policy changes to be introduced into the KiwiSaver Act 2006 in December 2008, will require, among other things, employer contributions to KiwiSaver to be on top of an employee’s existing pay when the employee joins a KiwiSaver scheme.
There will, therefore, no longer be a need for KiwiSaver “discrimination” provisions in the ERA.

Adequacy statement It has not been possible for the Regulatory Impact Analysis Team to undertake an assessment of the adequacy of the Regulatory Im­ pact Analysis and the Regulatory Impact Statement for this proposal within the time frames.
Status quo and problem Trial periods At present there are no provisions for trial periods that exclude the employee from raising a personal grievance for reasons of unjustiﬁed Explanatory note Employment Relations Amendment Bill 5 dismissal.

This is different to most other OECD member States, and means that businesses, particularly small businesses, are less likely to take a chance on new employees.
The existing provisions for trial periods under section 67 of the ERA require the employer to follow a similar process when dismissing an employee who has agreed to a probationary period, as with any other employee.

KiwiSaver Following the introduction of the KiwiSaver Act in 2006, there were reports that some employers were paying KiwiSaver employees less than other employees and claiming the employers’ tax credit.
The previous Government amended the ERA on 10 September 2008 to allow for an employee to raise a personal grievance if their employer adversely affected the employee’s employment because that employee was a member of a KiwiSaver scheme or a complying superannuation fund.
Government policy changes, to be legislated in the KiwiSaver Act 2006 in December 2008, and requiring that employer contributions must be on top of an employee’s pay when the employee joins a Kiwi­ Saver scheme, mean that the September 2008 ERA amendments are no longer required.
Objectives In considering changes to the ERA the key objectives are that the changes— • • should not create undue compliance (compliance): should be simple to apply, and be practical and proportionate to the size of the problem (practicality): should impact only on the problems identiﬁed (impact): should balance the needs of employers and employees (bal­ ance).
• • Trial periods The proposed intervention will enable small businesses to have a gen­ uine trial period of employment that is in line with most OECD mem­ ber States.

This proposal will provide small businesses with surety, while enabling extra opportunities for employees.
In examining this 6 Employment Relations Amendment Bill Explanatory note • proposal and measuring it against the objectives outlined above, it is considered that— compliance: it will lessen compliance, for instance where • small business employers may face claims on grounds of unjustiﬁed dismissal: impact: it will allow trial periods only by mutual agreement, and only small businesses are eligible to utilise this proposal, therefore it impacts directly on the identiﬁed problem: balance: it will provide small businesses with a genuine op­ portunity to assess the suitability of an employee for a period of up to 90 days of employment, while preserving the em­ ployee’s right raise a personal grievance and access relevant dispute resolution institutions on the grounds of discrimin­ ation.
• KiwiSaver The proposed intervention will complement other changes to the KiwiSaver regime, while providing an efﬁcient and robust regulatory framework.
In examining this proposal and measuring it against the objectives outlined above, it is considered that— • compliance: it would lessen compliance, for instance where employers may face claims for personal grievances: practicality: given the changes to the KiwiSaver framework, the ERA provisions are no longer necessary: impact: given the changes in terms of the legislative frame­ work, the problem originally legislated for no longer exists: balance: the proposed intervention will give employers greater certainty in terms of the potential for personal grievance actions, while the wider changes to the KiwiSaver scheme will help to ensure that the employees are treated equitably.
• • • Alternative options Trial periods The alternative option to the trial period proposal is the status quo, that is, the use of the existing section 67 of the ERA to agree to a probationary employment period.
Explanatory note Employment Relations Amendment Bill 7 This option is not the preferred option because— • the employer must still comply with certain procedural re­ quirements if the employer considers the probationary em­ ployee unsuitable for continued employment: the employee may still lodge a personal grievance on the grounds of unjustiﬁed dismissal: compliance costs for employers associated with trialling em­ ployees will not reduce: small businesses will continue to be more adversely affected compared with other sized businesses, as they are unlikely to have dedicated human resource procedures and personnel.
KiwiSaver No alternative option was considered in the development of this pro­ posal.

The Department considers that the KiwiSaver option set out below best ﬁts the Government’s wider objectives.
Preferred option Trial periods The preferred option proposes the following key features in relation to trial periods: • trial periods are agreed to in good faith as part of a written em­ ployment agreement signed by both parties at the beginning of the employment relationship between the employee and em­ ployer for a period of up to 90 calendar days (parties can agree to a shorter trial period if they wish): the trial period applies to employees who are employed in businesses that, at the beginning of the day of hiring, have fewer than 20 staff employed even if this increases the total number of staff over the threshold of 20 employees: the employer must comply with any agreed notice period, or give a period of notice of termination of employment: an employer may, within the agreed trial period, terminate the employee’s employment by notice, and as long as the notice is given within the trial period, an employee may not challenge the dismissal in the Employment Relations Authority (the Au­ • • • • • • 8 • • • • Employment Relations Amendment Bill Explanatory note thority) or the Employment Court (the Court) (subject to the exceptions described below): mediation services are available to parties in relation to the dismissal, although parties may not take the matter further to the Authority or the Court: an employee is not prevented from raising a personal grievance on grounds other than unjustiﬁed dismissal, such as under the discrimination or sexual or racial harassment provisions of the ERA, and such personal grievances may be resolved using the dispute resolution process in the ERA including access to the Authority or Court: an employer and a particular employee may agree to a trial period only once.
If the employment relationship ends and the employee is subsequently re­employed, the option of a trial period will not be available: the general probationary period arrangements that already exist under section 67 of the ERA will remain available to all employers.

This provision is available to businesses of any size and does allow employees to take personal grievances.
This proposal is in line with the Government’s small business and employment relations policies and will reduce personal grievances and costs for small businesses.
KiwiSaver The preferred option proposes that the following provisions of the ERA be repealed: • section 103(1)(h) of the ERA, which speciﬁes that one of the grounds that constitutes a personal grievance is that an em­ ployee’s employment has been adversely affected because the employee is a member of a KiwiSaver scheme or a complying superannuation fund; and section 110A the ERA, which outlines what behaviour by an employer constitutes grounds for a personal grievance as pro­ vided for under section 103(1)(h) of the Act.
• The preferred option supports the Government’s KiwiSaver policy.

Explanatory note Employment Relations Amendment Bill 9 Implementation and review It is intended that the provisions relating to trial periods will come into force on 1 April 2009, and the KiwiSaver changes will come into effect on the day after Royal assent.
Consultation The Treasury, the Inland Revenue Department, the State Services Commission, the Ministry of Economic Development, the Ministry of Social Development, and the Ministry of Justice have been con­ sulted.

The Ministry of Economic Development comments that more ef­ fective trial periods will reduce the risks experienced by small to medium­sized employers and so increase their propensity to take on new staff.
The Small Business Advisory Group has recommended greater employment ﬂexibility, including more effective trial periods and less rigid requirements around ﬁxed­term contracts, as a means for helping small business in the current economic environment.

Ex­ tending this initiative to all employers would have a positive effect on labour market efﬁciency.

Consideration could be given to evaluating the outcomes of this legislative change with a view to extending it to cover all employers in the future.
Hon Kate Wilkinson Employment Relations Amendment Bill Government Bill Contents Title Commencement Part 1 Preliminary provisions Principal Act amended Purpose Application Part 2 Amendments to principal Act Probationary arrangements New sections 67A and 67B inserted 67A When employment agreement may contain provision for trial period for 90 days or less Effect of trial provision under section 67A 67B Personal grievance Section 110A repealed Consequential amendment to KiwiSaver Act 2006 8—1 Page 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 cl 1 Employment Relations Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: Title This Act is the Employment Relations Amendment Act 2008.
Commencement This Act (except sections 6 and 7) comes into force on the 5 day after the date on which it receives the Royal assent.

Sections 6 and 7 come into force on 1 April 2009.

Part 1 Preliminary provisions Principal Act amended This Act amends the Employment Relations Act 2000.
10 Purpose The purpose of this Act is— (a) to provide when an employment agreement may spe­ cify a trial period of 90 days or less, during which an 15 employee can be dismissed and cannot bring a personal grievance or other legal proceedings in respect of the dismissal, subject to certain exceptions; and to repeal the amendments made by the Employment Relations (Breaks, Infant Feeding, and Other Matters) 20 Amendment Act 2008 relating to employees’ member­ ship of a KiwiSaver scheme or complying superannu­ ation fund.
(b) Application The amendments made by sections 6 and 7 apply to employ­ 25 ment agreements entered into only after the commencement of those sections.

1 2 (1) (2) 3 4 5 2 Employment Relations Amendment Bill Part 2 cl 7 Part 2 Amendments to principal Act 6 Probationary arrangements Section 67 is amended by omitting “or trial” in each place where it appears.
5 7 New sections 67A and 67B inserted The following sections are inserted after section 67: “67A When employment agreement may contain provision for trial period for 90 days or less “(1) An employment agreement containing a trial provision, as de­ 10 ﬁned in subsection (2), may be entered into by an employee, as deﬁned in subsection (3), and an employer as deﬁned in subsection (4).
“(2) Trial provision means a written provision in an employment agreement that states, or is to the effect, that— “(a) for a speciﬁed period (not exceeding 90 days), starting at the beginning of the employee’s employment, the em­ ployee is to serve a trial period; and “(b) during that period the employer may dismiss the em­ “(c) ployee; and if the employer does so, the employee is not entitled to bring a personal grievance or other legal proceedings in respect of the dismissal.
“(3) Employee means an employee who has not been previously employed by the employer.

“(4) Employer means an employer who, at the beginning of the day on which the employment agreement is entered into, employs fewer than 20 employees.

“(5) To avoid doubt, a trial provision may be included in an em­ ployment agreement under— “(a) “(b) section 61(1)(a), but subject to section 61(1)(b): section 63(2)(b).
15 20 25 30 “67B Effect of trial provision under section 67A “(1) This section applies if an employer terminates an employment agreement containing a trial provision under section 67A by 35 giving the employee notice of the termination before the end 3 Part 2 cl 8 Employment Relations Amendment Bill of the trial period, whether the termination takes effect before, at, or after the end of the trial period.
“(2) An employee whose employment agreement is terminated in accordance with subsection (1) may not bring a personal grievance or legal proceedings in respect of the dismissal.

5 “(3) Neither this section nor a trial provision prevents an employee from bringing a personal grievance or legal proceedings on any of the grounds speciﬁed in section 103(1)(b) to (g).
“(4) An employee whose employment agreement contains a trial provision is, in all other respects (including access to medi­ 10 ation services), to be treated no differently from an employee whose employment agreement contains no trial provision or contains a trial provision that has ceased to have effect.
“(5) Subsection (4) applies subject to the following provisions: “(a) “(b) in observing the obligation in section 4 of dealing in 15 good faith with the employee, the employer is not re­ quired to comply with section 4(1A)(c) in making a de­ cision whether to terminate an employment agreement under this section; and the employer is not required to comply with a request 20 under section 120 that relates to terminating an employ­ ment agreement under this section.” Personal grievance Section 103(1)(h) is repealed.
Section 110A repealed Section 110A is repealed.

25 Consequential amendment to KiwiSaver Act 2006 Section 101B(5)(b) of the KiwiSaver Act 2006 is repealed.

Wellington, New Zealand: Published under the authority of the New Zealand Government—2008 8 9 10 12 4