Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1698928364433.pdf (New Zealand)
Reprint as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Public Act Date of assent Commencement 1995 No 27 9 June 1995 9 June 1995 Contents Title Short Title Interpretation Act to bind the Crown Part 1 Request by a Tribunal for assistance Tribunal may request assistance Form of requests Part 2 Arrest and surrender of person to a Tribunal Arrest of persons Notice by Attorney-General Issue of warrants Cancellation of warrant Page 4 4 4 6 6 7 8 8 9 Note Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.
A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.

This Act is administered by the Ministry of Justice.
1 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Remand Release from remand at direction of Attorney-General Application for search warrant Surrender of persons Surrender determination by Attorney-General Release from remand on refusal to surrender person Surrender warrant Persons imprisoned under New Zealand law Detention following surrender warrant Content of surrender warrant Release from remand Effect of surrender on prisoner’s sentence Expiry of New Zealand sentences while under Tribunal detention Part 3 Other forms of assistance to a Tribunal Taking evidence, etc Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence Taking of evidence Producing documents or other articles Legal representation Form of certificate Compellability of persons to attend Tribunal immunity certificates Powers of Judge may be exercised by Registrar Search and seizure Attorney-General may authorise application for search warrant Giving evidence at hearings, or assisting in investigations, in foreign countries Person other than offender giving evidence or assisting Offender giving evidence or assisting Effect of removal to foreign country on prisoner’s sentence Undertakings relating to persons giving evidence or assisting Custody of persons in transit 34 Transit 2 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 18 19 19 20 22 22 23 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 35 Service of process Assistance in serving documents 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Part 4 Sittings of a Tribunal in New Zealand Tribunal sittings in New Zealand Tribunal’s powers while sitting in New Zealand Tribunal may administer oaths in New Zealand Orders made by Tribunal not subject to review Contempt of Tribunal Part 5 Forfeiture of proceeds of Tribunal offences Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders Registration of order Effect of registration of order Registered forfeiture orders Third parties may apply for
 relief Court may grant relief to third party Cancellation of registration of forfeiture order Part 6 Search, seizure, and powers of arrest Search warrants 48 49 50 50A Issue of search warrants Form and content of search warrant [Repealed] Powers conferred by warrant [Repealed] Power to stop vehicles [Repealed] 51 52 53 54 55 Execution of search warrants Person executing warrant to produce evidence of authority [Repealed] Notice to owner or occupier of execution of warrant [Repealed] Certificate to Tribunal of execution of warrant Arrest Power to enter premises to arrest person Retention of things seized General Part 7 Miscellaneous 56 Act not to limit other provision of assistance 24 25 25 26 26 26 27 27 28 28 29 30 31 31 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 34 36 3 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 57 58 59 60 61 62 Attorney-General may decline to comply with request in certain cases Certificates given by Attorney-General Notification of response to Tribunal request Regulations Additional tribunals to be added by Order in Council Amendment to Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1968 Schedule 36 37 37 37 38 39 40 An Act to provide for New Zealand to assist— (a) the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991; and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens responsible for genocide and other such violations committed in the territory of neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994; and other ad hoc tribunals that may be established by the Security Council of the United Nations under chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations for the prosecution of violations of international humanitarian law— (b) (c) in the
 performance of their functions Short Title This Act may be cited as the International War Crimes Tri- bunals Act 1995.
Interpretation In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,— 1 2 4 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 s 2 forfeiture order means: (a) (b) an order made by a Tribunal, under the Statute of the Tribunal or under rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal, for forfeiture of tainted property; or a declaration made by a Tribunal, under the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal, evidencing forfeiture of tainted prop- erty under that Statute or those rules High Court means the High Court of New Zealand Judge means a High Court Judge offence, in relation to the law of New Zealand, includes an offence against a law relating to taxation, Customs duty, or other revenue matters, or relating to foreign exchange control prison has the same meaning as in section 3(1) of the Correc- tions Act 2004 prisoner means a person who is for the time being in the legal custody under the Corrections Act 2004 property means real or personal property of every description, whether situated in New Zealand or elsewhere and whether tangible or intangible, and includes an interest in any such real or personal property Statute of the Tribunal, in relation to any particular tribunal, means the statute of that tribunal, a copy of the English text of which is set out in the Schedule surrender warrant means a warrant issued under section 14 tainted property means property used in the commission of, or the proceeds of, a Tribunal offence Tribunal means— (a) the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Hu- manitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the For- mer Yugoslavia since 1991, established by Resolution 827 (1993) of the Security Council of the United Na- tions; or the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Commit- ted in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens (b) 5 s 3 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 responsible for genocide and other such violations com- mitted in the territory of neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994, established by Resolution 955 (1994) of the Security Council of the United Nations; or any other tribunal that the Governor-General by Order in Council declares under section 61 to be a tribunal for the purposes of this Act; and any of the organs of a particular tribunal referred to in the statute of that tribunal (c) (d) Tribunal offence means, in relation to a particular tribunal, an offence for which the Tribunal has the power to prosecute persons under the Statute of the Tribunal.
Section 2 penal institution: repealed, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).

Section 2 prison: inserted, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).

Section 2 prisoner: amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).

3 Act to bind the Crown This Act binds the Crown.


Part 1 Request by a Tribunal for assistance Tribunal may request assistance 4 (1) Where a Tribunal needs the assistance of New Zealand in order to— (a) perform its functions in respect of an investigation or prosecution it is conducting or proposing to conduct; or give effect to an order issued by the Tribunal,— (b) the Tribunal may make a request for assistance.
(2) Any request under subsection (1) shall be made to the Attor- ney-General or a person authorised by the Attorney-General.
(3) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), a Tribunal may make a request for assistance of any 1 or more of the following types: 6 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 1 s 5 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) arresting and surrendering to the Tribunal a person in relation to whom the Tribunal has issued an arrest war- rant: executing a request for search and seizure: obtaining evidence or a document or other article: providing a document or other record: locating and identifying a witness or suspect: arranging for a person to give evidence or assist an in- vestigation: causing the forfeiture of tainted property: serving documents: arranging for the Tribunal to sit in New Zealand.
Form of requests 5 (1) A request from a Tribunal under section 4 that is in writing and specifies— (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) the nature of the investigation or prosecution in respect of which the request is made; and in a certificate from the Tribunal, that the request is in respect of an investigation or prosecution relating to a Tribunal offence; and the legal basis on which the Tribunal relies for conduct- ing the investigation or prosecution; and the nature of the assistance sought by the Tribunal; and the facts and law relevant to the investigation or pros- ecution (in addition to the statement required by para- graph (c)); and the procedure (if any) that the Tribunal wishes the At- torney-General to follow in complying with the request, including the form in which material shall be given to the Tribunal; and the period within which the Tribunal wishes the request to be complied with; and any confidentiality requirements that the Tribunal con- siders should be observed; and any other matters that the Tribunal considers may assist the Attorney-General in complying with the request; and 7 Part 2 s 6 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (j) any other matters that the Attorney-General has previ- ously notified the Tribunal will assist the Attorney-Gen- eral in complying with the request,— shall be received and dealt with in accordance with this Act.
(2) A request for assistance shall not be invalid by reason only of the fact that it does not comply with the requirements of subsection (1).
Part 2 Arrest and surrender of person to a Tribunal Arrest of persons Notice by Attorney-General 6 (1) Where— (a) (b) the Attorney-General receives from a Tribunal a request for the surrender of a person; and the request is accompanied by an arrest warrant in rela- tion to the person that was issued by the Tribunal, or by a copy of that warrant authenticated by the Tribunal,— the Attorney-General shall, by notice in writing, directed to any Judge, state that the request has been received.
(2) Where any notice is sent to a Judge under subsection (1), a copy of— (a) (b) shall also be sent to the Judge.
the arrest warrant referred to in subsection (1)(b); and the request made under section 4— Issue of warrants The Judge to whom a notice is sent under section 6 shall, with- out undue delay, issue a warrant in the prescribed form for the arrest of the person named in the notice if the Judge is of the opinion, having regard to the documents forwarded under sec- tion 6 and to any other evidence that is available to the Judge, that the person named in the warrant is or may be in or travel- ling to New Zealand.
7 (1) 8 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 2 s 10 (2) When the Judge has considered whether or not to issue a war- rant in accordance with this section, the Judge shall send to the Attorney-General written notice of his or her decision.
Cancellation of warrant 8 (1) Where the Attorney-General is satisfied that there are special circumstances that make it unjust or otherwise inappropriate for a warrant issued under section 7 to continue in force, the Attorney-General shall, by notice in writing, order the cancel- lation of the warrant.
(2) Where the Attorney-General orders the cancellation of a war- rant under subsection (1) the warrant shall cease to have effect and any person arrested under the warrant shall be released, unless the person is otherwise liable to be detained in custody.

Compare: 1965 No 44 s 7(3), (4) Remand 9 (1) A person who is arrested under a warrant issued under section 7 shall, unless the warrant ceases to have effect under section 8, be brought before a Judge as soon as is practicable.
Subject to subsection (3), the Judge shall remand the person in custody or on bail for such period or periods as may be necessary to enable the Attorney-General to make a surrender determination under section 12.
(2) (3) Where any person is remanded in custody or on bail under this section, the provisions of sections 45, 45A, 46, and 47 of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957, and sections 28 to 38 of the Bail Act 2000 shall apply as if the person had been arrested for an offence punishable by imprisonment and with any other necessary modifications.

Section 9(3): amended, on 1 January 2001, by section 74(2) of the Bail Act 2000 (2000 No 38).
Release from remand at direction of Attorney-General 10 (1) Where a person has been remanded under section 9 and the At- torney-General is satisfied that there are special circumstances that make it unjust or otherwise inappropriate for the remand to continue, the Attorney-General shall, by notice in writing, order the release from custody of the person or the discharge 9 Part 2 s 11 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 of the conditions on which bail was granted to the person, as the case may be.
(2) Where the Attorney-General makes an order under subsection (1) in relation to a person who has been remanded in custody, a copy of the notice shall be sent to the prison manager of the prison in which the person is detained, and upon receipt of the notice the person in custody shall be released unless the person is otherwise liable to be detained in custody.
(3) Where the Attorney-General makes an order under subsection (1) in relation to a person who has been remanded on bail, a copy of the notice shall be sent to the Registrar of the court at which the person was released on bail.

Section 10(2): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).
Application for search warrant Where— (a) (b) a person is arrested under a warrant issued under section 7; and a constable who is of or above the level of position of in- spector has reasonable grounds for believing that there is in or on any place or thing any thing that is relevant to the Tribunal offence in respect of which the warrant was issued,— the constable may apply to an issuing officer for the issue of a search warrant in accordance with section 48.
Section 11: amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(2) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Section 11: amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 11(b): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
Surrender of persons Surrender determination by Attorney-General Subject to subsection (2), the Attorney-General shall deter- mine whether a person remanded under sections 6 to 11 is to be surrendered to the Tribunal.
11 12 (1) 10 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 2 s 14 (2) Unless the Attorney-General is satisfied that there are special circumstances that would make it unjust or otherwise inappro- priate to surrender the person, the Attorney-General shall de- termine that the person is to be surrendered to the Tribunal.
The determination shall be made as soon as is reasonably prac- ticable, having regard to the circumstances, after the person is first remanded under section 9.

(3) (4) Notwithstanding subsection (3), every determination required to be made under this section shall be made within 6 months of the date on which the person was first remanded under sec- tion 9.
13 Release from remand on refusal to surrender person (1) Where the Attorney-General has determined not to surrender the person to the Tribunal, the Attorney-General shall, by no- tice in writing, order, as the case may require,— the release of the person from custody; or (a) the discharge of the recognisances on which bail was (b) granted to the person.
(2) Where the Attorney-General makes an order under subsec- tion (1) in relation to a person who has been remanded in cus- tody, a copy of the notice shall be sent to the prison manager of the prison in which the person is detained, and upon receipt of the notice the person in custody shall be released unless the person is otherwise liable to be detained in custody.
(3) Where the Attorney-General makes an order under subsec- tion (1) in relation to a person who has been remanded on bail, a copy of the notice shall be sent to the Registrar of the court at which the person was released on bail.

Section 13(2): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).
14 (1) Surrender warrant Subject to section 15, where the Attorney-General determines that the person is to be surrendered to the Tribunal, the At- torney-General shall issue a warrant for the surrender of the person to the Tribunal.

11 Part 2 s 15 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (2) 15 (1) (2) The surrender warrant shall be in writing in the prescribed form.
Persons imprisoned under New Zealand law The Attorney-General shall not issue a surrender warrant if— the person is serving a sentence of imprisonment in re- (a) spect of an offence against the law of New Zealand; and the Tribunal has been required to give adequate under- takings to the Attorney-General relating to— (i) (b) the person’s return to New Zealand to serve the remainder of the sentence once the person is no longer required to be detained by, or on the order of, the Tribunal; and the person’s custody while travelling, and while in other countries, for the Tribunal’s purposes; and (ii) (c) the Attorney-General is not satisfied that the Tribunal has given adequate undertakings relating to those mat- ters.
For the purposes of this section, the person is not taken to be serving a sentence of imprisonment if he or she has been re- leased on parole or licence, or has been otherwise condition- ally released, for the remainder of the sentence.

Section 15(1)(a): amended, on 30 June 2002, by section 186 of the Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9).

Section 15(2): amended, on 30 June 2002, by section 186 of the Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9).
Detention following surrender warrant 16 (1) Where the Attorney-General issues a surrender warrant under section 14, the person shall, if he or she is in custody, be brought as soon as is practicable before a Judge.

(2) Where the Attorney-General issues a surrender warrant under section 14 and the person has been remanded on bail, any con- stable may arrest that person without warrant, and the person shall be brought as soon as is practicable before a Judge.
12 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 2 s 18 (3) The Judge shall order the committal of the person to a prison to remain there until he or she is surrendered or released ac- cording to law.

Compare: 1965 No 44 s 10(1) Section 16(2): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 16(3): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).
Content of surrender warrant 17 (1) A surrender warrant in relation to a person (in this section re- ferred to as the “eligible person”) shall— (a) (b) require the person in whose custody the eligible person is being held to release the eligible person into the cus- tody of a constable; and authorise the constable to transport the eligible person in custody, and, if necessary or convenient, to detain the eligible person in custody, for the purpose of enabling the eligible person— (i) to be placed in the custody of a specified person who is an officer of the Tribunal or other person authorised by the Tribunal; and to be transported to a place specified by the Tri- bunal; and (ii) (c) authorise the specified person to transport the eligible person in custody to a place specified by the Tribunal for the purpose of surrendering the eligible person to a person appointed by the Tribunal to receive the person.
(2) A place referred to in subsection (1)(b) or (c) may be a place in or outside New Zealand.

Section 17(1)(a): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 17(1)(b): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
18 (1) Release from remand This section applies to a person— (a) in relation to whom a surrender warrant has been issued; and 13 Part 2 s 19 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (b) (b) who is in custody in New Zealand under the warrant, or otherwise under this Act, more than 2 months after the day on which the warrant was first liable to be executed.
Subject to subsection (3), the High Court shall order that a per- son to whom this section applies be released from that custody if— (a) the person has made an application to the High Court to be released; and reasonable notice of the intention to apply to the High Court was given by the person to the Attorney-General.
The High Court shall not order that the person be released from custody if it is satisfied that the surrender warrant has not been executed within the period of 2 months, or since the person last made an application under subsection (2), as the case may be,— (a) because to do so would have been dangerous to the per- son’s life or prejudicial to the person’s health; or for any other reasonable cause.
(b) Effect of surrender on prisoner’s sentence Subject to subsection (2), where a person who is serving a sen- tence in respect of an offence against the law of New Zealand is surrendered to a Tribunal under this Part, the person shall, while he or she is in the custody of, or on the order of, the Tri- bunal (including custody outside New Zealand), be deemed to be continuing to serve that sentence.
If the person is convicted of a Tribunal offence, time spent by the person in custody serving a sentence of imprisonment imposed by the Tribunal for the Tribunal offence is not to be counted as time towards the sentence referred to in subsection (1).
Expiry of New Zealand sentences while under Tribunal detention If— (a) at the time a person was surrendered to a Tribunal under this Part, the person was serving a sentence of impris- onment in respect of an offence against the law of New Zealand; and (2) (3) 19 (1) (2) 20 14 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 3 s 22 (b) the sentence of imprisonment that the person was serv- ing at that time expires while the person is being de- tained by, or on the order of, the Tribunal,— the Attorney-General must without delay inform the Tribunal of the expiry, and, if the Tribunal was required to give under- takings in accordance with section 15(1)(b), that the undertak- ings are no longer required to be complied with.
Section 20(a): amended, on 30 June 2002, by section 186 of the Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9).

Section 20(b): amended, on 30 June 2002, by section 186 of the Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9).
Part 3 Other forms of assistance to a Tribunal Taking evidence, etc Attorney-General may authorise taking of evidence This section applies where a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General— (a) (b) for evidence to be taken in New Zealand; or for documents or other articles in New Zealand to be produced— for the purposes of a proceeding before, or an investigation conducted by, the Tribunal.
Subject to section 57, where the Attorney-General is satis- fied— (a) (b) that the request relates to a Tribunal offence; and that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the evidence can be taken or, as the case may be, the documents or other articles can be produced in New Zealand,— the Attorney-General may authorise, in writing, assistance in accordance with section 22 and section 23.
Compare: 1992 No 86 s 31(2) 21 (1) (2) Taking of evidence 22 (1) Where the Attorney-General authorises the taking of evidence under section 21, the evidence shall be taken on oath from each witness by a Judge.
15 Part 3 s 23 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (2) The Judge who takes evidence in accordance with subsection (1), shall— (a) (b) (c) cause the evidence to be put in writing; and certify that the evidence was taken by the Judge; and cause the writing so certified to be sent to the Attorney- General.
(2) Producing documents or other articles 23 (1) Where the Attorney-General authorises the production of documents or other articles, that production shall be required by the order of a Judge.

Subject to subsection (3), if the documents or other articles are produced, the Judge shall send them to the Attorney-General together with a written statement certifying that they were pro- duced to the Judge.
In the case of documents, the Judge may send to the Attorney- General copies of the documents certified by the Judge to be true copies.
(3) Legal representation The Judge conducting a proceeding under section 22 or section 23, or both, may permit— (a) the person to whom the proceeding before, or investi- gation conducted by, the Tribunal relates; and any other person giving evidence or producing docu- ments or other articles at the proceeding before the Judge; and the Tribunal— (c) to have legal representation at the proceeding before the Judge.
(b) Form of certificate A certificate by a Judge under section 22(2) or section 23(2) shall state whether, when the evidence was taken or the docu- ments or other articles were produced, any of the following persons were present: (a) the person to whom the proceeding before, or the in- vestigation conducted by, the Tribunal relates, or that person’s legal representative (if any): 24 25 16 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 3 s 27 (b) any other person giving evidence or producing docu- ments or other articles, or that person’s legal represen- tative (if any).
26 (1) (2) Compellability of persons to attend Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the law of New Zealand with respect to compelling persons— (a) (b) to attend before a Judge; and to give evidence, answer questions, and produce docu- ments or other articles— on the hearing of a charge against a person for an offence against the law of New Zealand shall apply, with necessary modifications, with respect to compelling persons for the pur- poses of sections 22 and 23.
For the purposes of sections 22 and 23, the person to whom the proceeding before, or the investigation conducted by, the Tribunal relates, is competent but not compellable to give evi- dence.
(3) No person who is required, pursuant to section 22 or section 23, to give evidence, or to produce documents or other articles for the purposes of a proceeding before, or investigation con- ducted by, a Tribunal shall be required to give any evidence, or to produce any document or article, that the person could not be compelled to give or produce in the proceedings before, or investigation conducted by, the Tribunal.
(4) A person who is required, pursuant to section 22 or section 23, to give evidence or produce documents or other articles for the purposes of a proceeding before, or investigation con- ducted by, the Tribunal shall have the same privileges in rela- tion to the answering of questions and the production of docu- ments or articles as if the proceedings were pending in a New Zealand court or the investigation were being conducted in New Zealand, as the case may be.
Compare: 1992 No 86 s 33(2), (4) 27 (1) Tribunal immunity certificates In this section, Tribunal immunity certificate means a cer- tificate or declaration that— 17 Part 3 s 28 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (a) (b) is given or made by a Tribunal under the Statute of the Tribunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal; and specifies or declares that, under the Statute of the Tri- bunal or under the rules adopted under the Statute of the Tribunal, persons generally or a specified person could or could not— either generally or in specified proceedings; and (i) (ii) either generally or in specified circumstances— be required to answer a specified question or to produce a specified document.
(2) A Tribunal immunity certificate, duly authenticated in accord- ance with subsection (3), is admissible in proceedings for the purposes of the application of section 26(3) as prima facie evi- dence of the matters stated in the certificate.

(3) A certificate is duly authenticated for the purposes of subsec- tion (2) if it purports to be signed or certified by a Judge, Regis- trar, or officer of the Tribunal.
Powers of Judge may be exercised by Registrar 28 (1) Any Judge may authorise a Registrar of the High Court to ex- ercise the powers of a Judge under section 22 or section 23 in respect of any particular case.

(2) Any authorisation given under subsection (1) may be revoked at any time by any Judge.
(3) Where any matter in respect of which a Registrar has juris- diction under any authorisation given under subsection (1) ap- pears to the Registrar to be one of special difficulty, he or she may refer the matter to a Judge, who may dispose of the mat- ter or may refer it back to the Registrar with such directions as the Judge thinks fit.

(4) Nothing in this section shall prevent the exercise, by any Judge, of any jurisdiction or powers conferred on any Regis- trar under this section.
Compare: 1992 No 86 s 35 18 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 3 s 30 Search and seizure 29 30 (1) Attorney-General may authorise application for search warrant Subject to section 57, where— (a) a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General to assist in obtaining by search and seizure any thing that is relevant to a Tribunal offence; and the Attorney-General is satisfied that there are reason- able grounds for believing that the thing is located in New Zealand,— (b) the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise a constable to apply to an issuing officer for the issue of a search warrant in accordance with section 48, and that constable may apply for the warrant accordingly.
Section 29: amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(3) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Section 29: amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
Giving evidence at hearings, or assisting in investigations, in foreign countries Person other than offender giving evidence or assisting This section applies where— (a) a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General for the attendance of a person— (i) at a hearing in a foreign country in connection with a proceeding before the Tribunal; or in a foreign country to assist an investigation be- ing conducted by the Tribunal; and (ii) (b) the person is in New Zealand and is not a person de- scribed in section 31(1)(b).
(2) Where, on receipt of a request to which this section applies, the Attorney-General is satisfied— (a) that the proceeding or investigation relates to a Tribunal offence; and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the per- son can give evidence relevant to the proceeding or as- sist the investigation; and (b) 19 Part 3 s 31 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (c) (d) that the person has freely consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country; and that the Tribunal has given, to the extent, if any, required by the Attorney-General, an adequate undertaking in respect of the matters specified in section 33,— the Attorney-General may, subject to section 57, authorise, in writing, assistance to the Tribunal in accordance with this sec- tion and may assist in the making of arrangements to facilitate that attendance.
31 (1) Offender giving evidence or assisting This section applies where— (a) a Tribunal has made a request to the Attorney-General for the attendance of a person— (i) at a hearing in a foreign country in connection with a proceeding before the Tribunal; or in a foreign country to assist an investigation be- ing conducted by the Tribunal; and (ii) (b) the person is in New Zealand and is— (i) (ii) a prisoner; or on parole, home detention, or compassionate re- lease, or is subject to release conditions, under Part 1 of the Parole Act 2002; or subject to a sentence of home detention imposed under section 80A of the Sentencing Act 2002; or [Repealed] at large pursuant to section 62 of the Corrections Act 2004; or subject to a community-based sentence (within the meaning of section 4(1) of the Sentencing Act 2002).
(iia) (iii) (iv) (v) (2) Where, on receipt of a request to which subsection (1) applies, the Attorney-General is satisfied— (a) that the proceeding or investigation relates to a Tribunal offence; and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the per- son can give evidence relevant to the proceeding or as- sist the investigation; and (b) 20 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 3 s 31 (c) (d) that the person has freely consented to giving evidence or assisting in the foreign country; and that the Tribunal has given, to the extent, if any, required by the Attorney-General, adequate undertakings in re- spect of the matters referred to in section 33,— the Attorney-General may, subject to section 57, authorise the travel of the person to a foreign country in accordance with this section.
(3) Where travel by a person to a foreign country is authorised in accordance with subsection (2), the Attorney-General may,— in the case of a person who is a prisoner, direct that the (a) prisoner be released from the prison in which that per- son is detained for the purpose of travelling to the for- eign country to give evidence at the hearing, and may make arrangements for the prisoner to travel to the for- eign country in the custody of a constable or a prison officer: in the case of any other person to which this section ap- plies, approve and arrange the travel of the person to the foreign country to give evidence at the hearing, and may obtain such approvals, authorities, and permissions as are required for the purpose, including the variation, discharge, or suspension of the conditions of the per- son’s release, or the variation, cancellation, or suspen- sion of the person’s sentence, or of the conditions of the person’s sentence.
(b) (5) (4) A direction given, pursuant to subsection (3)(a), by the Attor- ney-General in respect of a prisoner shall be sufficient author- ity for the release of the prisoner from the prison in which he or she is detained for the purposes of the direction.
Every person released under a direction given pursuant to sub- section (3)(a) shall, while that person is in New Zealand dur- ing the period of that release, be deemed, for the purposes of section 120 of the Crimes Act 1961 (which relates to escaping from lawful custody) and for that purpose only, to continue to be in legal custody for the time being under the Corrections Act 2004.
Compare: 1992 No 86 s 38 21 Part 3 s 32 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Section 31(1)(b)(ii): substituted, on 30 June 2002, by section 125 of the Parole Act 2002 (2002 No 10).

Section 31(1)(b)(iia): inserted, on 1 October 2007, by section 58 of the Sen- tencing Amendment Act 2007 (2007 No 27).

Section 31(1)(b)(iii): repealed, on 30 June 2002, by section 125 of the Parole Act 2002 (2002 No 10).
Section 31(1)(b)(iv): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Correc- tions Act 2004 (2004 No 50).

Section 31(1)(b)(v): amended, on 30 June 2002, by section 186 of the Sentenc- ing Act 2002 (2002 No 9).

Section 31(3)(a): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 31(3)(a): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).
Section 31(4): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).

Section 31(5): amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).
32 Effect of removal to foreign country on prisoner’s sentence Where a prisoner who is serving a sentence for an offence against the law of New Zealand is released from a New Zealand prison pursuant to a request by a Tribunal under section 31, the prisoner shall, while in custody in connection with the request (including custody outside New Zealand), be deemed to be continuing to serve that sentence.
Compare: 1992 No 86 s 41 Section 32: amended, on 1 June 2005, by section 206 of the Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50).
33 Undertakings relating to persons giving evidence or assisting (1) Where a Tribunal makes a request to the Attorney-General for the attendance of a person to whom section 31 applies or a person to whom section 30 applies to give evidence or assist, the Attorney-General shall seek from the Tribunal an under- taking— (a) that the person will only be required to give evidence or assistance in relation to the Tribunal offence specified in the request; and 22 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 3 s 34 (b) (c) that any evidence given by the person will not be used in any proceeding other than the proceeding to which the Tribunal offence relates; and that the person will be returned to New Zealand as soon as practicable in accordance with arrangements agreed to by the Attorney-General.
(2) In a case where the request relates to a person who is a pris- oner, and the Attorney-General requests the Tribunal to make arrangements for the keeping of the prisoner in custody while the prisoner is in the foreign country, the Tribunal shall also give, to the extent, if any, required by the Attorney-General, the following undertakings: (a) that appropriate arrangements will be made for that pur- pose: that the prisoner will not be released from custody in the foreign country without the prior approval of the Attorney-General: that if the prisoner is released in accordance with para- graph (b), the prisoner’s accommodation and expenses will be paid for by the Tribunal until the Tribunal de- cides that the person is no longer required to give evi- dence in the proceeding, or to assist the investigation, to which the request relates.
(b) (c) Custody of persons in transit Transit 34 (1) Where a person is to be transported in custody from a foreign country through New Zealand to another foreign country for the purpose of— (a) (b) giving evidence in a proceeding before a Tribunal; or giving assistance in relation to an investigation being conducted by a Tribunal; or being surrendered to a Tribunal,— (c) that person may be transported through New Zealand in the custody of another person.
(2) Where an aircraft or ship by which the person is being trans- ported lands or calls at a place in New Zealand, the person 23 Part 3 s 35 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 must be kept in such custody as the Attorney-General may di- rect in writing until the person’s transportation is continued.
(3) Where— (a) a person is being held in custody pursuant to a direction under subsection (2); and the person’s transportation is not, in the Attorney-Gen- eral’s opinion, continued within a reasonable time,— (b) the Attorney-General may direct that the person be transported in custody to the foreign country from which the person was first transported, and such a direction shall be sufficient au- thority for that person’s removal from New Zealand by such means as the Attorney-General directs.
For the purposes of enabling the grant of a limited visa under the Immigration Act 2009 to any person whom it is proposed to transport through New Zealand pursuant to this section, the Attorney-General may issue a certificate, in writing, that the person is to be transported through New Zealand pursuant to this section.
The Attorney-General may, at any time by notice in writing, cancel any certificate issued under subsection (4) in respect of any person who is in New Zealand for the purposes of being transported through New Zealand pursuant to this section if the Attorney-General is satisfied that that person’s presence in New Zealand is no longer necessary for that purpose.

Compare: 1992 No 86 s 42(5), (6) Section 34(4): amended, at 2 am on 29 November 2010, by section 406(1) of the Immigration Act 2009 (2009 No 51).
Assistance in serving documents Service of process Subject to section 57, where— (a) a Tribunal requests the Attorney-General to arrange for service in New Zealand of a process relating to a pro- ceeding before, or an investigation conducted by, the Tribunal in respect of a Tribunal offence; and the Attorney-General is satisfied— (i) that the request relates to a Tribunal offence; and (b) (4) (5) 35 (1) 24 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 4 s 37 (ii) that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be served is located in New Zealand,— the Attorney-General may authorise service of the process.
(2) Where service is authorised under subsection (1), the Attor- ney-General shall direct the appropriate authority to arrange service, and in such a case the authority shall— (a) use its best endeavours to have the process served— (i) (ii) (ii) in accordance with procedures proposed in the request; or if those procedures would be unlawful or in- appropriate in New Zealand, or if no procedures are so proposed, in accordance with the law of New Zealand; and is served, transmit to the Attorney-General for transmission to the Tribunal a certificate as to service; or is not served, transmit to the Attorney-General for transmission to the Tribunal a statement of the reasons that prevented the service.
(b) if the document— (i) Compare: 1992 No 86 s 51(3) Part 4 Sittings of a Tribunal in New Zealand Tribunal sittings in New Zealand 36 (1) A Tribunal may sit in New Zealand for the purpose of perform- ing its functions.

(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), a Tribunal may sit in New Zealand for the purpose of— (a) (b) taking evidence; or conducting or continuing a proceeding before the Tri- bunal; or giving judgment in a proceeding before the Tribunal.
(c) 37 Tribunal’s powers while sitting in New Zealand While a Tribunal is sitting in New Zealand, it may exercise such powers that the Tribunal may exercise under the Statute 25 Part 4 s 38 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 of the Tribunal, and under any rules of procedure and evidence adopted pursuant to the Statute of the Tribunal and for the time being in force.
(2) Tribunal may administer oaths in New Zealand 38 (1) A Tribunal may at any sitting of the Tribunal in New Zealand administer an oath or affirmation in accordance with the prac- tice and procedure of the Tribunal.

Evidence given by a person on oath or affirmation adminis- tered by the Tribunal under subsection (1) shall, for the pur- poses of section 108 of the Crimes Act 1961 (which relates to perjury), be deemed to have been given as evidence in a judi- cial proceeding on oath.
Compare: 1908 No 89 s 56M; 1990 No 44 s 3 Orders made by Tribunal not subject to review No application for review under Part 1 of the Judicature Amendment Act 1972 and no application for an order of mandamus or prohibition or certiorari or for a declaration or injunction may be brought in respect of any judgment or order or determination of a Tribunal made or given at a sitting of the Tribunal in New Zealand.
Compare: 1908 No 89 s 56N; 1990 No 44 s 3 Contempt of Tribunal Every person commits an offence who, at any sitting of a Tri- bunal in New Zealand,— (a) assaults, threatens, intimidates, or wilfully insults— (i) (ii) (iii) a Judge of the Tribunal; or the Prosecutor of the Tribunal; or the Registrar or any other officer of the Tribunal; or a person appearing as a barrister or solicitor, or both, before the Tribunal; or a witness in proceedings before the Tribunal; or (iv) (v) (b) wilfully interrupts or obstructs the proceedings.
Every person commits an offence who, wilfully and without lawful excuse, disobeys any order or direction of a Tribunal made or given in the course of its proceedings.

39 40 (1) (2) 26 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 5 s 42 (3) Every person who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or to a fine not exceeding $1,000.
Compare: 1908 No 89 s 56O; 1990 No 44 s 3 Part 5 Forfeiture of proceeds of Tribunal offences 41 (1) (2) Requests for enforcement of forfeiture orders Subject to section 57, where— (a) a Tribunal requests the Attorney-General to make ar- rangements for the enforcement of a forfeiture order made in relation to property that is believed to be in New Zealand; and the Attorney-General is satisfied that a person has been convicted by the Tribunal of the Tribunal offence to which the order relates; and the Attorney-General is satisfied that the conviction and the order are not subject to further appeal in the Tri- bunal,— (b) (c) the Attorney-General may, in writing, authorise the Solicitor- General to apply for the registration of the order in a specified court.
The court specified shall be the office of the High Court that is closest to the place in which the property is believed to be located, or, where the location of the property is not known, any office of the High Court.

Registration of order 42 (1) Where the Solicitor-General applies to the High Court for the registration of an order in accordance with section 41, the court shall, if it is satisfied that the order is in force, register the order.
(2) An order, or an amendment of an order, shall be registered in the High Court by the registration, in accordance with the prescribed procedure, of— (a) a copy of the appropriate order or amendment sealed by the court or other authority making that order or amend- ment; or 27 Part 5 s 43 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (b) a copy of that order or amendment duly authenticated in accordance with subsection (3).
(3) A document is duly authenticated for the purposes of subsec- tion (2) if it purports to be signed or certified by a Judge, Regis- trar, or officer of the Tribunal that made the order or amend- ment.
(4) Where the High Court registers an order in accordance with this section, the court shall direct the Solicitor-General— (a) to give notice of the registration, in the manner and within the time the court considers appropriate, to spe- cified persons (other than a person convicted of an of- fence in respect of which the order was made) that the court has reason to believe may have an interest in the property; or to publish notice of the registration in the manner and within the time the court considers appropriate.
(b) Compare: 1992 No 86 ss 56(1), 63(2) Effect of registration of order Subject to sections 44 to 47, a forfeiture order registered in accordance with section 42 has effect and may be enforced as if it were a profit forfeiture order made by the High Court under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 and entered on the date of registration.

Section 43: substituted, on 1 December 2009, by section 203 of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 (2009 No 8).
Registered forfeiture orders Where a forfeiture order against property is registered in ac- cordance with section 42,— (a) subpart 3 of Part 2 of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 so far as is applicable and with any necessary modifications, and except to the extent that this Act pro- vides otherwise, applies in relation to the order; and the property may be disposed of, or otherwise dealt with, in accordance with any direction of the Attor- ney-General or of a person authorised in writing by the Attorney-General for the purposes of this paragraph; and (b) 43 44 28 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 5 s 45 (c) if for any reason the Attorney-General decides not to di- rect that the property be transferred to a person or per- sons in accordance with the request from the Tribunal that made the order, the Attorney-General shall arrange for the property to be transferred to the person in whom it was vested immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
Compare: 1991 No 120 s 23A(a); 1992 No 87 s 4 Section 44(a): substituted, on 1 December 2009, by section 204 of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 (2009 No 8).
Third parties may apply for relief 45 (1) Where a forfeiture order against property is registered in ac- cordance with section 42, any person (other than a person con- victed of an offence in respect of which the order was made) who claims an interest in any of the property to which the order relates may apply to the court for an order under section 46.
(2) A person on whom notice of the hearing of the Tribunal held in connection with the making of the forfeiture order was served, or who appeared at the hearing, may not apply under subsec- tion (1) except with the leave of the court.

The court shall not grant leave under subsection (2) unless there are special reasons for doing so.
(3) (4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), the court may grant leave under subsection (2) if it is satisfied— (a) that the applicant had good reason for failing to attend the hearing held by the Tribunal in connection with the making of the forfeiture order; or that evidence proposed to be adduced by the applicant in connection with the application under subsection (1) was not reasonably available to the applicant at the time of that hearing.
(b) (5) (6) Subject to subsection (6), an application under subsection (1) shall be made before the expiry of the period of 2 months be- ginning on the date on which the forfeiture order is registered in the court.
The court may grant a person leave to apply under subsection (1) outside the period referred to in subsection (5) if the court 29 Part 5 s 46 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 is satisfied that the person’s failure to apply within that period was not due to any neglect on the person’s part.
(7) A person who makes an application under subsection (1) shall serve notice of the application on the Solicitor-General, who shall be a party to any proceedings on the application.
Compare: 1991 No 120 s 23C; 1992 No 87 s 4 Court may grant relief to third party 46 (1) Where— (a) a person applies to the court under section 45 in respect of an interest in property; and the court is satisfied that the applicant’s claim to that interest is valid,— (b) the court shall, subject to subsection (2), make an order— (c) declaring the nature, extent, and value of the applicant’s interest in the property; and either— (i) (d) directing the Crown to transfer the interest to the applicant; or declaring that there is payable by the Crown to the applicant an amount equal to the value of the interest declared by the court.
(ii) (b) The court may refuse to make an order under subsection (1) if it is satisfied that— (a) the applicant was, in any respect, involved in the com- mission of the offence in respect of which the forfeiture order was made; or if the applicant acquired the interest at the time of or after the commission of the offence, the applicant did not acquire the interest in the property in good faith and for value, without knowing or having reason to believe that the property was, at the time of the acquisition, tainted property,— but nothing in this subsection shall be taken to require such a refusal.
Compare: 1991 No 120 s 23D; 1992 No 87 s 4 (2) 30 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 6 s 48 Cancellation of registration of forfeiture order 47 (1) Where a forfeiture order has been registered in accordance with section 42, the Attorney-General may direct the Solici- tor-General to apply to the High Court for cancellation of the registration of the order.
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the Attorney- General may give a direction under that subsection in relation to an order if the Attorney-General is satisfied— (a) that the order has, since its registration in New Zealand, ceased to have effect; or that the order was registered in contravention of section 42.
(b) (3) Where, in accordance with a direction given under subsection (1), the Solicitor-General applies to the High Court for cancel- lation of the registration of an order, the court shall cancel the registration accordingly.
(4) Where, pursuant to the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009, a forfeiture order registered in accordance with section 42 is discharged (in whole or in part) or is revoked, that discharge or revocation may be a ground for an application for cancellation of the order under this section.

Section 47(4): amended, on 1 December 2009, by section 205 of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 (2009 No 8).
Part 6 Search, seizure, and powers of arrest Search warrants Issue of search warrants 48 (1) Any issuing officer (within the meaning of section 3 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012) who, on an application made in the manner provided in subpart 3 of Part 4 of that Act by a constable who is of or above the level of position of inspector under section 11, is satisfied that there are reason- able grounds for believing that there is in or on any place or thing— (a) any thing upon or in respect of which a relevant Tri- bunal offence has been, or is suspected of having been, committed; or 31 Part 6 s 49 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (b) any thing which there are reasonable grounds for believ- ing will be evidence as to the commission of any such offence— may issue a search warrant in respect of that thing.
(2) An issuing officer (within the meaning of section 3 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012) who, on an application made in the manner provided in subpart 3 of Part 4 of that Act by a constable authorised under section 29, is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that there is in or on any place or thing— (a) any thing upon or in respect of which any Tribunal of- fence has been, or is suspected of having been commit- ted; or any thing which there are reasonable grounds for be- lieving will be evidence as to the commission of such an offence— (b) may issue a search warrant in respect of that thing.
The provisions of subparts 1 to 5 and 7 to 10 of Part 4, and sections 161 and 162 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 apply.

In subsection (1), relevant Tribunal offence means a Tribunal offence in respect of which a person has been arrested under a warrant issued under section 7.

Section 48(1): amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(4) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Section 48(1): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
Section 48(2): amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(5) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Section 48(3): replaced, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(6) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Form and content of search warrant [Repealed] Section 49: repealed, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(7) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).
(3) (4) 49 32 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 6 s 54 50 Powers conferred by warrant [Repealed] Section 50: repealed, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(7) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

50A Power to stop vehicles [Repealed] Section 50A: repealed, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(7) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).
51 52 53 Execution of search warrants Person executing warrant to produce evidence of authority [Repealed] Section 51: repealed, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(7) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Notice to owner or occupier of execution of warrant [Repealed] Section 52: repealed, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(7) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).
a warrant issued under section 48 is executed; and any thing is seized pursuant to the warrant,— Certificate to Tribunal of execution of warrant Where— (a) (b) the Attorney-General shall, where the Tribunal concerned re- quests, give to the Tribunal a certificate specifying the date and time of execution of the warrant, the identity of the person who executed the warrant, and the thing or things seized under the warrant.
Section 53: amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(8) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).
Arrest 54 (1) Power to enter premises to arrest person Subject to subsection (2), where— 33 Part 6 s 55 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (2) (a) (b) a constable has, pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act or pursuant to section 16(2), power to arrest a per- son; and the constable believes on reasonable grounds that the person is on any premises,— the constable may enter the premises, using such force as is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances, at any time of the day or night for the purpose of arresting the person.
If, in any case to which this section applies, the constable is not in uniform and any person in actual occupation of the premises requires the constable to produce evidence of his or her author- ity, the constable shall before entering on the premises produce his or her badge or other evidence that he or she is a constable.

Section 54(1): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
Section 54(1)(a): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 54(1)(b): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 54(2): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
General Retention of things seized 55 (1) Where a constable seizes a thing pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act, that constable shall deliver it into the custody and control of the Commissioner of Police or a constable who is of or above the level of position of inspector designated by the Commissioner of Police to receive things seized under this Act.
Subject to subsection (5), the Commissioner of Police or des- ignated constable shall— (a) (2) inform the Attorney-General that the thing has been so delivered; and retain the thing for a period not exceeding 1 month from the day on which the thing was seized pending the At- torney-General’s direction under subsection (3) about how to deal with the thing; and (b) 34 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 6 s 55 (c) comply with any direction that the Attorney-General gives.
(3) The Attorney-General may, by written notice, give the Com- missioner of Police or designated constable a direction as to how to deal with the thing seized.

(5) (4) Without limiting the directions that may be given under subsection (3), the Attorney-General may require the Com- missioner of Police or designated constable to send the thing seized to the Tribunal concerned.
Subject to sections 154 and 155 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (which apply with any necessary modifications), the Attorney-General shall direct the Commissioner of Police or designated constable to return the thing seized if— the reason for its seizure no longer exists; or (a) it is decided that the thing is not to be used in evidence (b) by the Tribunal concerned— (6) unless the thing seized is the subject of a dispute as to who is entitled to it.
Subject to sections 154 and 155 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (which apply with any necessary modifications), if no direction is given by the Attorney-General before the ex- piry of the period referred to in subsection (2)(b), the Com- missioner of Police or designated constable shall arrange for the thing to be returned to the person from whose possession it was seized as soon as practicable after that period has expired unless the thing seized is the subject of a dispute as to who is entitled to it.
Compare: 1992 No 86 s 49(4) Section 55(1): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 55(1): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 55(2): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 55(3): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
Section 55(4): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Section 55(5): amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(9) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

35 Part 7 s 56 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Section 55(5): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).
Section 55(6): amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 267(10) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).

Section 55(6): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(b) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).

Part 7 Miscellaneous Act not to limit other provision of assistance Nothing in this Act shall prevent the provision of assistance to a Tribunal otherwise than under this Act.
(b) Attorney-General may decline to comply with request in certain cases The Attorney-General may decline to comply with a request to which section 21, 29, 30, 31, 35, or 41 applies where, in the Attorney-General’s opinion,— (a) to comply with the request would prejudice the sovereignty, security, or national interests of New Zealand; or the request relates to the prosecution of a person for an offence in a case where the person has been tried by a national court or authority, whether in New Zealand or elsewhere, in respect of that offence or for another offence constituted by the same act or omission except where the Tribunal is exercising jurisdiction because— the act or omission for which the person has been (i) tried was characterised as an ordinary offence under the law of the country where the trial took place; or the proceedings in the national court or authority were— (A) (B) not impartial or independent; or designed to shield the person from inter- national criminal responsibility; or not diligently prosecuted; or (C) (ii) 56 57 36 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 7 s 60 (c) (d) the request is for assistance of a kind that would require steps to be taken for its implementation that could not be lawfully taken; or there are some other exceptional circumstances that jus- tify non-compliance with the request.
Certificates given by Attorney-General 58 (1) Where the Attorney-General receives a request made by a Tri- bunal, the Attorney-General may give a certificate certifying all or any of the following facts: (a) that a request for assistance under this Act has been made by the Tribunal: that the request meets the requirements of this Act: that the acceptance of the request has been duly made under and in accordance with this Act.
(b) (c) (2) In any proceeding under this Act a certificate purporting to have been given under subsection (1) shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be sufficient evidence of the matters cer- tified by the certificate.

Compare: 1992 No 86 s 64 Notification of response to Tribunal request 59 (1) Where a request for assistance under this Act is received from a Tribunal, the Attorney-General shall ensure that the Tribunal is provided with a response to that request.
If the Attorney-General declines, in accordance with this Act, to comply with a request, the Attorney-General shall give rea- sons to the Tribunal for the Attorney-General’s decision.
(2) 60 Regulations The Governor-General may from time to time, by Order in Council, make regulations for all or any of the following pur- poses: (a) prescribing the procedure to be followed in dealing with requests made by a Tribunal, and providing for notifica- tion of the results of action taken pursuant to any such request: 37 Part 7 s 61 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) prescribing the procedures for obtaining evidence or producing documents or other articles pursuant to a re- quest made by a Tribunal: providing for the payment of fees, travelling allow- ances, and expenses to any person in New Zealand who gives or provides evidence or assistance pursuant to a request made by a Tribunal: prescribing conditions for the protection of any property sent to a Tribunal pursuant to a request made under this Act; and making provision for the return of property in New Zealand pursuant to a request: prescribing the forms of applications, notices, certifi- cates, warrants, and other documents for the purposes of this Act, and requiring the use of such forms: providing for such other matters as are contemplated by or are necessary for giving full effect to this Act and for its due administration.
61 (1) (2) Additional tribunals to be added by Order in Council The Governor-General may from time to time, by Order in Council, declare a tribunal that has been established by the Security Council of the United Nations under chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations to be a tribunal for the pur- poses of this Act, and, for that purpose, may also, by the same Order in Council, add a new Part to the Schedule setting out the statute of that tribunal.
The Governor-General may from time to time, by Order in Council, declare that a tribunal has ceased to be a tribunal for the purposes of this Act and, for that purpose, may also, by the same Order in Council, omit the Part of the Schedule that sets out the statute of that tribunal.

(3) An Order in Council made under this section is deemed to be a regulation for the purposes of the Regulations (Disallowance) Act 1989.
38 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Part 7 s 62 62 Amendment to Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1968 Amendment(s) incorporated in the Act(s).
39 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Schedule s 2 Part I Statute of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia Since 1991 Having been established by the Security Council acting under Chap- ter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, the International Tri- bunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Viola- tions of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 (hereinafter referred to as “the International Tribunal”) shall function in accordance with the provi- sions of the present Statute.
Article 1—Competence of the International Tribunal The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 in accordance with the provisions of the present Statute.
Article 2—Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute per- sons committing or ordering to be committed grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the rele- vant Geneva Convention: wilful killing; (a) torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experi- (b) ments; wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health; (c) 40 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part I—continued Article 2—continued (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justi- fied by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wan- tonly; compelling a prisoner of war or a civilian to serve in the forces of a hostile power; wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or a civilian of the rights of a fair and regular trial; unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a civilian; taking civilians as hostages.
Article 3—Violations of the laws or customs of war The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons violating the laws or customs of war.

Such violations shall include, but not be limited to: (a) employment of poisonous weapons or other weapons calcu- lated to cause unnecessary suffering; (b) wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation (c) (d) (e) 1.
2. not justified by military necessity; attack, or bombardment, by whatever means, of undefended towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings; seizure of, destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to religion, charity and education, the arts and sci- ences, historic monuments and works of art and science; plunder of public or private property.
Article 4—Genocide The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute persons committing genocide as defined in paragraph 2 of this article or of committing any of the other acts enumerated in paragraph 3 of this article.
Genocide means any of the following acts committed with in- tent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: 41 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part I—continued Article 4—continued (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
3.

The following acts shall be punishable: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) genocide; conspiracy to commit genocide; direct and public incitement to commit genocide; attempt to commit genocide; complicity in genocide.
Article 5—Crimes against humanity The International Tribunal shall have the power to prosecute per- sons responsible for the following crimes when committed in armed conflict, whether international or internal in character, and directed against any civilian population: (a) murder; (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) extermination; enslavement; deportation; imprisonment; torture; rape; persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds; other inhumane acts.
Article 6—Personal jurisdiction The International Tribunal shall have jurisdiction over natural per- sons pursuant to the provisions of the present Statute.

42 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule 1.

2.

3.

4.
2.

3.

4.

Part I—continued Article 7—Individual criminal responsibility A person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of a crime referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statute, shall be individually responsible for the crime.
The official position of any accused person, whether as Head of State or Government or as a responsible Government of- ficial, shall not relieve such person of criminal responsibility nor mitigate punishment.
The fact that any of the acts referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statute was committed by a subordinate does not relieve his superior of criminal responsibility if he knew or had reason to know that the subordinate was about to commit such acts or had done so and the superior failed to take the necessary and reasonable measures to prevent such acts or to punish the perpetrators thereof.
The fact that an accused person acted pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior shall not relieve him of criminal responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punish- ment if the International Tribunal determines that justice so requires.
Article 8—Territorial and temporal jurisdiction The territorial jurisdiction of the International Tribunal shall extend to the territory of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yu- goslavia, including its land surface, airspace and territorial waters.

The temporal jurisdiction of the International Tribunal shall extend to a period beginning on 1 January 1991.

Article 9—Concurrent jurisdiction 1.


The International Tribunal and national courts shall have con- current jurisdiction to prosecute persons for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1 January 1991.

43 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 2.

1.

2.

3.

Part I—continued Article 9—continued The International Tribunal shall have primacy over national courts.
At any stage of the procedure, the International Tri- bunal may formally request national courts to defer to the com- petence of the International Tribunal in accordance with the present Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal.
Article 10—Non-bis-in-idem No person shall be tried before a national court for acts con- stituting serious violations of international humanitarian law under the present Statute, for which he or she has already been tried by the International Tribunal.
A person who has been tried by a national court for acts con- stituting serious violations of international humanitarian law may be subsequently tried by the International Tribunal only if: (a) the act for which he or she was tried was characterized as an ordinary crime; or the national court proceedings were not impartial or in- dependent, were designed to shield the accused from international criminal responsibility, or the case was not diligently prosecuted.
(b) In considering the penalty to be imposed on a person convicted of a crime under the present Statute, the International Tribunal shall take into account the extent to which any penalty imposed by a national court on the same person for the same act has already been served.
Article 11—Organization of the International Tribunal The International Tribunal shall consist of the following organs: (a) The Chambers, comprising two Trial Chambers and an Ap- peals Chamber; The Prosecutor, and A Registry, servicing both the Chambers and the Prosecutor.
(b) (c) 44 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part I—continued Article 12—Composition of the Chambers The Chambers shall be composed of eleven independent judges, no two of whom may be nationals of the same State, who shall serve as follows: (a) (b) Three judges shall serve in each of the Trial Chambers; Five judges shall serve in the Appeals Chamber.

1.

2.
1.

2.

Article 13—Qualifications and election of judges The judges shall be persons of high moral character, impar- tiality and integrity who possess the qualifications required in their respective countries for appointment to the highest judi- cial offices.

In the overall composition of the Chambers due account shall be taken of the experience of the judges in crim- inal law, international law, including international humanitar- ian law and human rights law.
The judges of the International Tribunal shall be elected by the General Assembly from a list submitted by the Security Council, in the following manner: (a) invite nominations for The Secretary-General shall judges of the International Tribunal from States Mem- bers of the United Nations and non-member States maintaining permanent observer missions at United Nations Headquarters; (c) (b) Within sixty days of the date of the invitation of the Sec- retary-General, each State may nominate up to two can- didates meeting the qualifications set out in paragraph 1 above, no two of whom shall be of the same nationality; The Secretary-General shall forward the nominations received to the Security Council.
From the nominations received the Security Council shall establish a list of not less than twenty-two and not more than thirty-three can- didates, taking due account of the adequate representa- tion of the principal legal systems of the world; The President of the Security Council shall transmit the list of candidates to the President of the General As- sembly.
From that list the General Assembly shall elect (d) 45 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part I—continued Article 13—continued the eleven judges of the International Tribunal.

The candidates who received an absolute majority of the votes of the States Members of the United Nations and of the non-Member States maintaining permanent ob- server missions at United Nations Headquarters, shall be declared elected.
Should two candidates of the same nationality obtain the required majority vote, the one who received the higher number of votes shall be con- sidered elected.

In the event of a vacancy in the Chambers, after consultation with the Presidents of the Security Council and of the General Assembly, the Secretary-General shall appoint a person meet- ing the qualifications of paragraph 1 above, for the remainder of the term of office concerned.

The judges shall be elected for a term of four years.
The terms and conditions of service shall be those of the judges of the International Court of Justice.

They shall be eligible for re-election.

Article 14—Officers and members of the Chambers The judges of the International Tribunal shall elect a President.

The President of the International Tribunal shall be a member of the Appeals Chamber and shall preside over its proceedings.
After consultation with the judges of the International Tri- bunal, the President shall assign the judges to the Appeals Chamber and to the Trial Chambers.

A judge shall serve only in the Chamber to which he or she was assigned.

The judges of each Trial Chamber shall elect a Presiding Judge, who shall conduct all of the proceedings of the Trial Chamber as a whole.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

4.


Article 15—Rules of procedure and evidence The judges of the International Tribunal shall adopt rules of proced- ure and evidence for the conduct of the pre-trial phase of the proceed- 46 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part I—continued Article 15—continued ings, trials and appeals, the admission of evidence, the protection of victims and witnesses and other appropriate matters.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

2.

3.


Article 16—The Prosecutor The Prosecutor shall be responsible for the investigation and prosecution of persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1 January 1991.

The Prosecutor shall act independently as a separate organ of the International Tribunal.

He or she shall not seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other source.
The Office of the Prosecutor shall be composed of a Prosecutor and such other qualified staff as may be required.

The Prosecutor shall be appointed by the Security Council on nomination by the Secretary-General.

He or she shall be of high moral character and possess the highest level of com- petence and experience in the conduct of investigations and prosecutions of criminal cases.

The Prosecutor shall serve for a four-year term and be eligible for reappointment.
The terms and conditions of service of the Prosecutor shall be those of an Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations.

The staff of the Office of the Prosecutor shall be appointed by the Secretary-General on the recommendation of the Prosecu- tor.

Article 17—The Registry The Registry shall be responsible for the administration and servicing of the International Tribunal.

The Registry shall consist of a Registrar and such other staff as may be required.
The Registrar shall be appointed by the Secretary-General after consultation with the President of the International Tribunal.

He or she shall serve for a four-year term and be eligible for reappointment.

The terms and conditions of 47 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part I—continued Article 17—continued service of the Registrar shall be those of an Assistant Secre- tary-General of the United Nations.
The staff of the Registry shall be appointed by the Secretary- General on the recommendation of the Registrar.

Article 18—Investigation and preparation of indictment The Prosecutor shall initiate investigations ex-officio or on the basis of information obtained from any source, particularly from Governments, United Nations organs, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.

The Prosecutor shall as- sess the information received or obtained and decide whether there is sufficient basis to proceed.
The Prosecutor shall have the power to question suspects, vic- tims and witnesses, to collect evidence and to conduct on-site investigations.

In carrying out these tasks, the Prosecutor may, as appropriate, seek the assistance of the State authorities con- cerned.
If questioned, the suspect shall be entitled to be assisted by counsel of his own choice, including the right to have legal assistance assigned to him without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it, as well as to necessary translation into and from a language he speaks and understands.
Upon a determination that a prima facie case exists, the Pros- ecutor shall prepare an indictment containing a concise state- ment of the facts and the crime or crimes with which the ac- cused is charged under the Statute.

The indictment shall be transmitted to a judge of the Trial Chamber.

Article 19—Review of the indictment The judge of the Trial Chamber to whom the indictment has been transmitted shall review it.
If satisfied that a prima facie case has been established by the Prosecutor, he shall confirm 4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

48 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part I—continued Article 19—continued the indictment.

If not so satisfied, the indictment shall be dis- missed.
Upon confirmation of an indictment, the judge may, at the re- quest of the Prosecutor, issue such orders and warrants for the arrest, detention, surrender or transfer of persons, and any other orders as may be required for the conduct of the trial.
Article 20—Commencement and conduct of trial proceedings The Trial Chambers shall ensure that a trial is fair and expe- ditious and that proceedings are conducted in accordance with the rules of procedure and evidence, with full respect for the rights of the accused and due regard for the protection of vic- tims and witnesses.
A person against whom an indictment has been confirmed shall, pursuant to an order or an arrest warrant of the International Tribunal, be taken into custody, immediately informed of the charges against him and transferred to the International Tribunal.

The Trial Chamber shall read the indictment, satisfy itself that the rights of the accused are respected, confirm that the ac- cused understands the indictment, and instruct the accused to enter a plea.

The Trial Chamber shall then set the date for trial.
The hearings shall be public unless the Trial Chamber decides to close the proceedings in accordance with its rules of pro- cedure and evidence.

Article 21—Rights of the accused All persons shall be equal before the International Tribunal.

In the determination of charges against him, the accused shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing, subject to article 22 of the Statute.

The accused shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the provisions of the present Statute.

49 2.

1.

2.
49 2.

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part I—continued Article 21—continued 4.
In the determination of any charge against the accused pur- suant to the present Statute, the accused shall be entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality: (a) to be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him; to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence and to communicate with counsel of his own choosing; to be tried without undue delay; to be tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing; to be informed, if he does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him in any such case if he does not have sufficient means to pay for it; to examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he can- not understand or speak the language used in the Inter- national Tribunal; not to be compelled to testify against himself or to con- fess guilt.
(b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Article 22—Protection of victims and witnesses The International Tribunal shall provide in its rules of procedure and evidence for the protection of victims and witnesses.

Such protection measures shall include, but shall not be limited to, the conduct of in camera proceedings and the protection of the victim’s identity.

50 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule 1.

2.

1.

2.

3.

1.
2.

1.

2.

3.

1.

Part I—continued Article 23—Judgement The Trial Chambers shall pronounce judgements and impose sentences and penalties on persons convicted of serious viola- tions of international humanitarian law.

The judgement shall be rendered by a majority of the judges of the Trial Chamber, and shall be delivered by the Trial Cham- ber in public.

It shall be accompanied by a reasoned opinion in writing, to which separate or dissenting opinions may be appended.
Article 24—Penalties The penalty imposed by the Trial Chamber shall be limited to imprisonment.

In determining the terms of imprisonment, the Trial Chambers shall have recourse to the general prac- tice regarding prison sentences in the courts of the former Yu- goslavia.

In imposing the sentences, the Trial Chambers should take into account such factors as the gravity of the offence and the indi- vidual circumstances of the convicted person.
In addition to imprisonment, the Trial Chambers may order the return of any property and proceeds acquired by criminal con- duct, including by means of duress, to their rightful owners.

Article 25—Appellate proceedings The Appeals Chamber shall hear appeals from persons con- victed by the Trial Chambers or from the Prosecutor on the following grounds: (a) an error on a question of law invalidating the decision; or an error of fact which has occasioned a miscarriage of justice.

(b) 2.
(b) 2.

The Appeals Chamber may affirm, reverse or revise the deci- sions taken by the Trial Chambers.
51 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part I—continued Article 26—Review proceedings Where a new fact has been discovered which was not known at the time of the proceedings before the Trial Chambers or the Appeals Chamber and which could have been a decisive factor in reaching the decision, the convicted person or the Prosecutor may submit to the International Tribunal an application for review of the judgement.
Article 27—Enforcement of sentences Imprisonment shall be served in a State designated by the Inter- national Tribunal from a list of States which have indicated to the Security Council their willingness to accept convicted persons.

Such imprisonment shall be in accordance with the applicable law of the State concerned, subject to the supervision of the International Tribunal.
Article 28—Pardon or commutation of sentences If, pursuant to the applicable law of the State in which the convicted person is imprisoned, he or she is eligible for pardon or commuta- tion of sentence, the State concerned shall notify the International Tribunal accordingly.

The President of the International Tribunal, in consultation with the judges, shall decide the matter on the basis of the interests of justice and the general principles of law.
Article 29—Cooperation and judicial assistance States shall cooperate with the International Tribunal in the in- vestigation and prosecution of persons accused of committing serious violations of international humanitarian law.
States shall comply without undue delay with any request for assistance or an order issued by a Trial Chamber, including, but not limited to: (a) (b) (c) (d) the identification and location of persons; the taking of testimony and the production of evidence; the service of documents; the arrest or detention of persons; 1.

2.
2.

52 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part I—continued Article 29—continued (e) the surrender or the transfer of the accused to the Inter- national Tribunal.

Article 30—The status, privileges and immunities of the International Tribunal The Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 13 February 1946 shall apply to the Inter- national Tribunal, the judges, the Prosecutor and his staff, and the Registrar and his staff.
The judges, the Prosecutor and the Registrar shall enjoy the privileges and immunities, exemptions and facilities accorded to diplomatic envoys, in accordance with international law.

The staff of the Prosecutor and of the Registrar shall enjoy the privileges and immunities accorded to officials of the United Nations under articles V and VII of the Convention referred to in paragraph 1 of this article.
Other persons, including the accused, required at the seat of the International Tribunal shall be accorded such treatment as is necessary for the proper functioning of the International Tri- bunal.

1.

2.

3.

4.

Article 31—Seat of the International Tribunal The International Tribunal shall have its seat at The Hague.
Article 32—Expenses of the International Tribunal The expenses of the International Tribunal shall be borne by the regu- lar budget of the United Nations in accordance with Article 17 of the Charter of the United Nations.

Article 33—Working languages The working languages of the International Tribunal shall be English and French.
53 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part I—continued Article 34—Annual report The President of the International Tribunal shall submit an annual report of the International Tribunal to the Security Council and to the General Assembly.
Part II Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States, Between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994 Having been established by the Security Council acting under Chap- ter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, the International Crim- inal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Geno- cide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens respon- sible for genocide and other such violations committed in the ter- ritory of neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 De- cember 1994 (hereinafter referred to as “the International Tribunal for Rwanda”) shall function in accordance with the provisions of the present Statute.
Article 1—Competence of the International Tribunal for Rwanda The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have the power to pros- ecute persons responsible for serious violations of international hu- manitarian law committed in the territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens responsible for such violations committed in the territory of neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994, in accordance with the provisions of the present Statute.
54 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part II—continued Article 2—Genocide 1.

2.

3.

The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have the power to prosecute persons committing genocide as defined in para- graph 2 of this article or of committing any of the other acts enumerated in paragraph 3 of this article.
Genocide means any of the following acts committed with in- tent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) (b) Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
(c) (d) (e) Genocide; Conspiracy to commit genocide; Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; The following acts shall be punishable: (a) (b) (c) (d) Attempt to commit genocide; Complicity in genocide.
(e) Article 3—Crimes against humanity The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have the power to pros- ecute persons responsible for the following crimes when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against any civilian popu- lation on national, political, ethic, racial or religious grounds: (a) Murder; Extermination; (b) (c) Enslavement; (d) Deportation; (e) (f) (g) Imprisonment; Torture; Rape; 55 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 3—continued (h) (i) Persecutions on political, racial and religious grounds; Other inhumane acts.
Article 4—Violations of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions and of Additional Protocol II The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have the power to pros- ecute persons committing or ordering to be committed serious viola- tions of Article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 for the Protection of War Victims, and of Additional Protocol II thereto of 8 June 1977.
These violations shall include, but shall not be limited to: (a) Violence to life, health and physical or mental well-being of persons, in particular murder as well as cruel treatment such as torture, mutilation or any form of corporal punishment; Collective punishments; Taking of hostages; (b) (c) (d) Acts of terrorism; (e) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, rape, enforced prostitution and any form of indecent assault; Pillage; The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly con- stituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples; Threats to commit any of the foregoing acts.
(f) (g) (h) Article 5—Personal jurisdiction The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have jurisdiction over natural persons pursuant to the provisions of the present Statute.

Article 6—Individual criminal responsibility A person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or 1.

56 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part II—continued Article 6—continued 2.

3.
3.

4. execution of a crime referred to in articles 2 to 4 of the present Statute, shall be individually responsible for the crime.

The official position of any accused person, whether as Head of State or Government or as a responsible Government of- ficial, shall not relieve such person of criminal responsibility nor mitigate punishment.
The fact that any of the acts referred to in articles 2 to 4 of the present Statute was committed by a subordinate does not relieve his or her superior of criminal responsibility if he or she knew or had reason to know that the subordinate was about to commit such acts or had done so and the superior failed to take the necessary and reasonable measures to prevent such acts or to punish the perpetrators thereof.
The fact that an accused person acted pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior shall not relieve him or her of criminal responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the International Tribunal for Rwanda deter- mines that justice so requires.
Article 7—Territorial and temporal jurisdiction The territorial jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall extend to the territory of Rwanda including its land surface and airspace as well as to the territory of neighbouring States in respect of serious violations of international humanitarian law committed by Rwandan citizens.

The temporal jurisdiction of the International Tri- bunal for Rwanda shall extend to a period beginning on 1 January 1994 and ending on 31 December 1994.
Article 8—Concurrent jurisdiction 1.
The International Tribunal for Rwanda and national courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute persons for ser- ious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens for such vio- 57 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 8—continued lations committed in the territory of neighbouring States, be- tween 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994.
The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall have primacy over the national courts of all States.

At any stage of the pro- cedure, the International Tribunal for Rwanda may formally request national courts to defer to its competence in accord- ance with the present Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal for Rwanda.
Article 9—Non bis in idem No person shall be tried before a national court for acts con- stituting serious violations of international humanitarian law under the present Statute, for which he or she has already been tried by the International Tribunal for Rwanda.
A person who has been tried by a national court for acts con- stituting serious violations of international humanitarian law may be subsequently tried by the International Tribunal for Rwanda only if: (a) the act for which he or she was tried was characterized as an ordinary crime; or the national court proceedings were not impartial or in- dependent, were designed to shield the accused from international criminal responsibility, or the case was not diligently prosecuted.
(b) In considering the penalty to be imposed on a person convicted of a crime under the present Statute, the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall take into account the extent to which any penalty imposed by a national court on the same person for the same act has already been served.

2.

1.

2.

3.
2.

1.

2.

3.

58 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part II—continued Article 10—Organization of the International Tribunal for Rwanda The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall consist of the following organs: (a) The Chambers, comprising two Trial Chambers and an Ap- peals Chamber; The Prosecutor; and A Registry.
(b) (c) Article 11—Composition of the Chambers The Chambers shall be composed of eleven independent judges, no two of whom may be nationals of the same State, who shall serve as follows: (a) (b) Three judges shall serve in each of the Trial Chambers; Five judges shall serve in the Appeals Chamber.

1.

2.

3.
1.

2.

3.

Article 12—Qualification and election of judges The judges shall be persons of high moral character, impar- tiality and integrity who possess the qualifications required in their respective countries for appointment to the highest judi- cial offices.

In the overall composition of the Chambers due account shall be taken of the experience of the judges in crim- inal law, international law, including international humanitar- ian law and human rights law.
The members of the Appeals Chamber of the International Tri- bunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 (hereinafter referred to as “the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia”) shall also serve as the members of the Appeals Chamber of the Inter- national Tribunal for Rwanda.
The judges of the Trial Chambers of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall be elected by the General Assembly from a list submitted by the Security Council, in the following man- ner: 59 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 12—continued (a) invite nominations for The Secretary-General shall judges of the Trial Chambers from States Members of the United Nations and non-Member States maintain- ing permanent observer missions at United Nations Headquarters; (c) (b) Within thirty days of the date of the invitation of the Secretary-General, each State may nominate up to two candidates meeting the qualifications set out in para- graph 1 above, no two of whom shall be of the same nationality and neither of whom shall be of the same nationality as any judge on the Appeals Chamber; The Secretary-General shall forward the nominations received to the Security Council.
From the nominations received the Security Council shall establish a list of not less than twelve and not more than eighteen candidates, taking due account of adequate representation on the International Tribunal for Rwanda of the principal legal systems of the world; The President of the Security Council shall transmit the list of candidates to the President of the General Assem- bly.

From that list the General Assembly shall elect the six judges of the Trial Chambers.
The candidates who receive an absolute majority of the votes of the States Members of the United Nations and of the non-Mem- ber States maintaining permanent observer missions at United Nations Headquarters, shall be declared elected.

Should two candidates of the same nationality obtain the required majority vote, the one who received the higher number of votes shall be considered elected.
(d) In the event of a vacancy in the Trial Chambers, after consult- ation with the Presidents of the Security Council and of the General Assembly, the Secretary-General shall appoint a per- son meeting the qualifications of paragraph 1 above, for the remainder of the term of office concerned.

The judges of the Trial Chambers shall be elected for a term of four years.

The terms and conditions of service shall be 4.

5.
5.

60 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part II—continued Article 12—continued those of the judges of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.

They shall be eligible for re-election.

1.

2.

3.

Article 13—Officers and members of the Chambers The judges of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall elect a President.
After consultation with the judges of the International Tribunal for Rwanda, the President shall assign the judges to the Trial Chambers.

A judge shall serve only in the Chamber to which he or she was assigned.

The judges of each Trial Chamber shall elect a Presiding Judge, who shall conduct all of the proceedings of that Trial Chamber as a whole.
Article 14—Rules of procedure and evidence The judges of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall adopt, for the purpose of proceedings before the International Tribunal for Rwanda, the rules of procedure and evidence for the conduct of the pre-trial phase of the proceedings, trials and appeals, the admission of evidence, the protection of victims and witnesses and other appro- priate matters of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia with such changes as they deem necessary.

1.

2.
1.

2.

Article 15—The Prosecutor The Prosecutor shall be responsible for the investigation and prosecution of persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens responsible for such violations committed in the territory of neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994.

The Prosecutor shall act independently as a separate organ of the International Tribunal for Rwanda.
He or she shall not seek or receive instructions from any Government or from any other source.

61 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 15—continued The Prosecutor of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia shall also serve as the Prosecutor of the Inter- national Tribunal for Rwanda.
He or she shall have additional staff, including an additional Deputy Prosecutor, to assist with prosecutions before the International Tribunal for Rwanda.

Such staff shall be appointed by the Secretary-General on the recommendation of the Prosecutor.

Article 16—The Registry The Registry shall be responsible for the administration and servicing of the International Tribunal for Rwanda.

The Registry shall consist of a Registrar and such other staff as may be required.
The Registrar shall be appointed by the Secretary-General after consultation with the President of the International Tri- bunal for Rwanda.

He or she shall serve for a four-year term and be eligible for reappointment.

The terms and conditions of service of the Registrar shall be those of an Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations.

The staff of the Registry shall be appointed by the Secretary- General on the recommendation of the Registrar.
Article 17—Investigation and preparation of indictment The Prosecutor shall initiate investigations ex-officio or on the basis of information obtained from any source, particularly from Governments, United Nations organs, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.

The Prosecutor shall as- sess the information received or obtained and decide whether there is sufficient basis to proceed.
The Prosecutor shall have the power to question suspects, vic- tims and witnesses, to collect evidence and to conduct on-site investigations.

In carrying out these tasks, the Prosecutor may, as appropriate, seek the assistance of the State authorities con- cerned.

3.

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

2.

62 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule 3.

4.

1.

2.

1.

2.
4.

1.

2.

1.

2.

Part II—continued Article 17—continued If questioned, the suspect shall be entitled to be assisted by counsel of his or her own choice, including the right to have legal assistance assigned to the suspect without payment by him or her in any such case if he or she does not have sufficient means to pay for it, as well as to necessary translation into and from a language he or she speaks and understands.
Upon a determination that a prima facie case exists, the Pros- ecutor shall prepare an indictment containing a concise state- ment of the facts and the crime or crimes with which the ac- cused is charged under the Statute.

The indictment shall be transmitted to a judge of the Trial Chamber.

Article 18—Review of the indictment The judge of the Trial Chamber to whom the indictment has been transmitted shall review it.
If satisfied that a prima facie case has been established by the Prosecutor, he or she shall confirm the indictment.

If not so satisfied, the indictment shall be dismissed.

Upon confirmation of an indictment, the judge may, at the re- quest of the Prosecutor, issue such orders and warrants for the arrest, detention, surrender or transfer of persons, and any other orders as may be required for the conduct of the trial.
Article 19—Commencement and conduct of trial proceedings The Trial Chambers shall ensure that a trial is fair and expe- ditious and that proceedings are conducted in accordance with the rules of procedure and evidence, with full respect for the rights of the accused and due regard for the protection of vic- tims and witnesses.
A person against whom an indictment has been confirmed shall, pursuant to an order or an arrest warrant of the Inter- national Tribunal for Rwanda, be taken into custody, imme- diately informed of the charges against him or her and trans- ferred to the International Tribunal for Rwanda.
63 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 19—continued The Trial Chamber shall read the indictment, satisfy itself that the rights of the accused are respected, confirm that the ac- cused understands the indictment, and instruct the accused to enter a plea.

The Trial Chamber shall then set the date for trial.
The hearings shall be public unless the Trial Chamber decides to close the proceedings in accordance with its rules of pro- cedure and evidence.

Article 20—Rights of the accused All persons shall be equal before the International Tribunal for Rwanda.

In the determination of charges against him or her, the accused shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing, subject to article 21 of the Statute.
The accused shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to the provisions of the present Statute.
In the determination of any charge against the accused pur- suant to the present Statute, the accused shall be entitled to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality: (a) To be informed promptly and in detail in a language which he or she understands of the nature and cause of the charge against him or her; To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his or her defence and to communicate with counsel of his or her own choosing; To be tried without undue delay; To be tried in his or her presence, and to defend himself or herself in person or through legal assistance of his or her own choosing; to be informed, if he or she does not have legal assistance, of this right; and to have legal assistance assigned to him or her, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by him or her in any such case if he or she does not have sufficient means to pay for it; To examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him or her and to obtain the attendance and examination (b) (c) (d) (e) 3.
4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

64 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part II—continued Article 20—continued (f) of witnesses on his or her behalf under the same condi- tions as witnesses against him or her; To have the free assistance of an interpreter if he or she cannot understand or speak the language used in the International Tribunal for Rwanda; (g) Not to be compelled to testify against himself or herself or to confess guilt.
Article 21—Protection of victims and witnesses The International Tribunal for Rwanda shall provide in its rules of procedure and evidence for the protection of victims and witnesses.

Such protection measures shall include, but shall not be limited to, the conduct of in camera proceedings and the protection of the victim’s identity.

1.

2.

1.

2.
1.

2.

1.

2.

Article 22—Judgement The Trial Chambers shall pronounce judgements and impose sentences and penalties on persons convicted of serious viola- tions of international humanitarian law.

The judgement shall be rendered by a majority of the judges of the Trial Chamber, and shall be delivered by the Trial Cham- ber in public.

It shall be accompanied by a reasoned opinion in writing, to which separate or dissenting opinions may be appended.
Article 23—Penalties The penalty imposed by the Trial Chamber shall be limited to imprisonment.

In determining the terms of imprisonment, the Trial Chambers shall have recourse to the general practice regarding prison sentences in the courts of Rwanda.

In imposing the sentences, the Trial Chambers should take into account such factors as the gravity of the offence and the indi- vidual circumstances of the convicted person.
65 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 23—continued 3.

1.

In addition to imprisonment, the Trial Chambers may order the return of any property and proceeds acquired by criminal con- duct, including by means of duress, to their rightful owners.
Article 24—Appellate proceedings The Appeals Chamber shall hear appeals from persons con- victed by the Trial Chambers or from the Prosecutor on the following grounds: (a) An error on a question of law invalidating the decision; or (b) An error of fact which has occasioned a miscarriage of justice.

2.

The Appeals Chamber may affirm, reverse or revise the deci- sions taken by the Trial Chambers.
Article 25—Review proceedings Where a new fact has been discovered which was not known at the time of the proceedings before the Trial Chambers or the Appeals Chamber and which could have been a decisive factor in reaching the decision, the convicted person or the Prosecutor may submit to the International Tribunal for Rwanda an application for review of the judgement.
Article 26—Enforcement of sentences Imprisonment shall be served in Rwanda or any of the States on a list of States which have indicated to the Security Council their willing- ness to accept convicted persons, as designated by the International Tribunal for Rwanda.

Such imprisonment shall be in accordance with the applicable law of the State concerned, subject to the supervision of the International Tribunal for Rwanda.
Article 27—Pardon or commutation of sentences If, pursuant to the applicable law of the State in which the convicted person is imprisoned, he or she is eligible for pardon or commuta- 66 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Schedule Part II—continued Article 27—continued tion of sentence, the State concerned shall notify the International Tribunal for Rwanda accordingly.
There shall only be pardon or com- mutation of sentence if the President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda, in consultation with the judges, so decides on the basis of the interests of justice and the general principles of law.

Article 28—Cooperation and judicial assistance States shall cooperate with the International Tribunal for Rwanda in the investigation and prosecution of persons accused of committing serious violations of international humanitarian law.
States shall comply without undue delay with any request for assistance or an order issued by a Trial Chamber, including, but not limited to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) The identification and location of persons; The taking of testimony and the production of evidence; The service of documents; The arrest or detention of persons; The surrender or the transfer of the accused to the Inter- national Tribunal for Rwanda.
Article 29—The status, privileges and immunities of the International Tribunal for Rwanda The Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 13 February 1946 shall apply to the Inter- national Tribunal for Rwanda, the judges, the Prosecutor and his or her staff, and the Registrar and his or her staff.

The judges, the Prosecutor and the Registrar shall enjoy the privileges and immunities, exemptions and facilities accorded to diplomatic envoys, in accordance with international law.
The staff of the Prosecutor and of the Registrar shall enjoy the privileges and immunities accorded to officials of the United 1.

2.

1.

2.

3.

67 Schedule International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Part II—continued Article 29—continued 4.

Nations under articles V and VII of the Convention referred to in paragraph 1 of this article.
Other persons, including the accused, required at the seat or meeting place of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall be accorded such treatment as is necessary for the proper func- tioning of the International Tribunal for Rwanda.

Article 30—Expenses of the International Tribunal for Rwanda The expenses of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall be ex- penses of the Organization in accordance with Article 17 of the Char- ter of the United Nations.
Article 31—Working languages The working languages of the International Tribunal shall be English and French.

Article 32—Annual report The President of the International Tribunal for Rwanda shall submit an annual report of the International Tribunal for Rwanda to the Se- curity Council and to the General Assembly.
68 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Search and Surveillance Act 2012 Public Act Date of assent Commencement 2012 No 24 5 April 2012 see section 2 1 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) Title This Act is the Search and Surveillance Act 2012.
Commencement Part 1 and subpart 1 of Part 3 (other than section 49(3) and (4)), and sections 136, 140, 141, 148, 162, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 175, 179, 180, 181, 247, 248, 251(3), 325 (other than section 325(4) and (6)), 334(1) and (7), 337(4), 342, 343, 346, 347, 349, 350, 352, 353, 354, 355, and 356 come into force on 18 April 2012.
The rest of this Act comes into force on a date appointed by the Governor-General by Order in Council, and 1 or more Orders in Council may be made bringing different provisions into force on different dates.

To the extent that it is not previously brought into force under subsection (2), the rest of this Act comes into force on 1 April 2014.

In this section, provision includes any item, or any part of an item, in the Schedule.
Section 2(2): Part 2, section 49(3), (4), subparts 2–4 of Part 3, Part 4 (except sections 136, 140, 141, 148, 162, 165–172, 175, 179–181), Part 5 (except sections 201(3)–(9), 247, 248, 251(3), 302, 325(1)–(3), (5), (7)–(13), 334(1), (7), 337(4), 342, 343, 346, 347, 349, 350, 352–356) and the Schedule (except the items relating to the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 and the Tax Administration Act 1994) brought into force, on 1 October 2012, by clause 3 of the Search and Surveillance Act Commencement Order 2012 (SR 2012/229).
Part 1 General provisions 5 Purpose The purpose of this Act is to facilitate the monitoring of com- pliance with the law and the investigation and prosecution 69 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 (b) of offences in a manner that is consistent with human rights values by— (a) modernising the law of search, seizure, and surveillance to take into account advances in technologies and to regulate the use of those technologies; and providing rules that recognise the importance of the rights and entitlements affirmed in other enactments, in- cluding the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, the Privacy Act 1993, and the Evidence Act 2006; and ensuring investigative tools are effective and adequate for law enforcement needs.
(c) Part 5 Amendments, repeals, and miscellaneous provisions Subpart 4—Regulation-making powers, transitional provisions, and review provision Transitional provisions 351 Transitional provision relating to provisions brought into force under section 2 (1) Despite any amendment in Part 5 of this Act,— (a) (b) (c) where an application has been made under an author- ising Act before the relevant commencement, and the application is not finally determined before that date, the provisions of that Act continue to apply to the ap- plication and to any matter or obligation relating to the application in all respects as if this Act (other than this section and any provisions in force immediately before the relevant commencement) had not been enacted; and those provisions continue to apply to a continuing war- rant and to any matter relating to the warrant in all re- spects as if this Act (other than this section and any pro- visions in force immediately before the relevant com- mencement) had not been enacted; and those provisions continue to apply to any other proceed- ing, matter, or thing commenced and not completed be- fore the relevant commencement as if this Act (other than this section and any provisions in force immedi- 70 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 (2) (3) ately before the relevant commencement) had not been enacted.
Subsection (1)(c) does not limit the provisions of the Interpret- ation Act 1999.

In this section,— authorising Act means an Act amended by Part 5 continuing warrant means a warrant or other authority issued under an authorising Act— (a) (b) before the relevant commencement; or on or after that date on an application made before that date relevant commencement, in relation to an authorising Act, means the commencement of a provision in Part 5 that amends an authorising Act.
71 Notes International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 Contents 1 2 3 4 General Status of reprints How reprints are prepared Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first) General This is a reprint of the International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995.
The reprint incorporates all the amendments to the Act as at 1 October 2012, as specified in the list of amendments at the end of these notes.

Relevant provisions of any amending enactments that contain transitional, savings, or application provisions that cannot be compiled in the reprint are also included, after the principal enactment, in chronological order.

For more information, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/reprints/.
Status of reprints Under section 16D of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, reprints are presumed to correctly state, as at the date of the reprint, the law enacted by the principal enactment and by the amendments to that enactment.

This presumption applies even though editorial changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in the reprint.
This presumption may be rebutted by producing the official volumes of statutes or statutory regulations in which the principal enactment and its amendments are contained.

How reprints are prepared editorial A number in the preparation of enacting words are of conventions reprints.

not included are For example, in Acts, followed the and 5 Notes 1 2 3 72 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Notes that are repealed or revoked are omitted.
provisions For a detailed list of see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/editorial-conventions/ or Part 8 of the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations and Deemed Regulations in Force.
the editorial conventions, 4 Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 authorises the making of editorial changes in a reprint as set out in sections 17D and 17E of that Act so that, to the extent permitted, the format and style of the reprinted enactment is consistent with current legislative drafting practice.

Changes that would alter the effect of the legislation are not permitted.
A new format of legislation was introduced on 1 January 2000.

Changes to legislative drafting style have also been made since 1997, and are ongoing.

To the extent permitted by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, all legislation reprinted after 1 January 2000 is in the new format for legislation and reflects current drafting practice at the time of the reprint.
In outline, the editorial changes made in reprints under the authority of section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 are set out below, and they have been applied, where relevant, in the preparation of this reprint: • omission of unnecessary referential words (such as “of this section” and “of this Act”) typeface and type size (Times Roman, generally in 11.5 point) layout of provisions, including: • • indentation position of section headings (eg, the number and heading now appear above the section) format of definitions (eg, the defined term now appears in bold type, without quotation marks) format of dates (eg, a date formerly expressed as “the 1st day of January 1999” is now expressed as “1 January 1999”) 73 • • • • Notes International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 • • • • • • • position of the date of assent (it now appears on the front page of each Act) punctuation (eg, colons are not used after definitions) Parts numbered with roman numerals are replaced with arabic numerals, and all cross-references are changed accordingly case and appearance of letters and words, including: • followed by small capital format of headings (eg, headings where each word formerly appeared with an initial capital letter letters are amended so that the heading appears in bold, with only the first word (and any proper nouns) appearing with an initial capital letter) small capital letters in section and subsection references are now capital letters • schedules are renumbered (eg, Schedule 1 replaces First Schedule), and all cross-references are changed accordingly running heads (the information that appears at the top of each page) format of amendments, and schedules of are rearranged into alphabetical order, chronological).
two-column schedules of consequential they rather than repeals (eg, 5 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first) Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24): section 267 Immigration Act 2009 (2009 No 51): section 406(1) Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 (2009 No 8): sections 203–205 Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72): section 116(a)(ii), (b) Sentencing Amendment Act 2007 (2007 No 27): section 58 Corrections Act 2004 (2004 No 50): section 206 Parole Act 2002 (2002 No 10): section 125 Sentencing Act 2002 (2002 No 9): section 186 Bail Act 2000 (2000 No 38): section 74(2) Crimes Amendment Act (No 2) 1997 (1997 No 93): section 25 74 Reprinted as at 1 October 2012 International War Crimes Tribunals Act 1995 Notes 12 Wellington, New Zealand: Published under the authority of the New Zealand Government—2012 75