Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1698939970774.pdf (South Africa)
Thursday, 23 July 2020] No 100—2020] SECOND SESSION, SIXTH PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA _____________________ ANNOUNCEMENTS, TABLINGS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS _____________________ THURSDAY, 23 JULY 2020 _____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNOUNCEMENTS National Assembly 1.

Referral to Committees of papers tabled .......................................................................... 2 National Council of Provinces 1.
Referral to Committees of papers tabled .......................................................................... 3 TABLINGS National Assembly 1.

Speaker ............................................................................................................................. 3 COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 National Assembly 1.

2.

3.
2.

3.

Communications ............................................................................................................... 4 Home Affairs .................................................................................................................. 10 Home Affairs .................................................................................................................. 13 ANNOUNCEMENTS National Assembly The Speaker 1.
Referral to Committees of papers tabled (1) The following paper is referred to the Portfolio Committee on Basic Education for consideration and report: (a) Annexure to the Strategic Plan for 2020-21 – 2024-25 and Annual Performance Plan for 2020-21 of the Department of Basic Education, including the Technical Indicator Descriptions.
(2) The following paper is referred to the Portfolio Committee on Health for consideration and report: (a) Revised Annual Performance Plan of the National Department of Health for 2020-21.

(3) The following papers are referred to the Portfolio Committee on Environment, Forestry and Fisheries for consideration and report: (a) Amended Annual Performance Plan of the South African National Biodiversity Institute for 2020-21.

(b) Amended Annual Performance Plan of the South African Weather Service for 2020-21.
(c) Annual Performance Plan Review of the South African National Parks for 2020-21.

(d) Amended Annual Performance Plan of the iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority for 2020-21.
(4) The following papers are referred to the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services for consideration and report: (a) Report dated 21 July 2020, on the provisional suspension from office of Ms K Bodlani, an acting Regional Magistrate at Umlazi, KwaZulu-Natal, in terms of section 13(3)(b) of the Magistrates Act, 1993 (No 90 of 1993).

2 (b) Revised Annual Performance Plan of the Department of Correctional Services for 2020-21.

National Council of Provinces The Chairperson 1.


Referral to Committees of papers tabled (1) The following paper is referred to the Select Committee on Security and Justice for consideration and report: (a) Report dated 21 July 2020, on the provisional suspension from office of Ms K Bodlani, an acting Regional Magistrate at Umlazi, KwaZulu-Natal, in terms of section 13(3)(b) of the Magistrates Act, 1993 (No 90 of 1993).

TABLINGS National Assembly 1.


The Speaker (a) Reply by the Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development to Budgetary Review and Recommendation Report of the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development on Rural Development and Land Reform (Vote 39), as adopted by the Assembly on 9 November 2019.

Referred to the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development.
(b) Adjustments to the Strategic Plan for 2020 – 2025 and Annual Performance Plan of the Public Service Commission (PSC) for 2020/21.

COMMITTEE REPORTS National Assembly 3 1.
Report of the Portfolio Committee on Communications on the consideration of the communication received from the Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies on the filling of six vacancies on the Council of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), dated 22 July 2020 The Portfolio Committee on Communications (“the Committee”), having considered correspondence by the Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies (“the Minister”) on her recommendations after considering the 10 names submitted by the National Assembly on 9 June 2020, reports as follows: On 30 June 2020, the Minister addressed correspondence to the Speaker of the National Assembly in which she requested permission to appoint Councillors in only four of the six vacant positions.
According to the Minister, the proposed candidates did not possess skills relating to the digital economy, cybersecurity and trends of emerging technologies which are necessary for ICASA to effectively execute its mandate.

Accordingly, the Minister requested that the National Assembly embark on a new appointment process to fill the two vacancies that would remain if her request was agreed to.
On 13 July 2020, the Minister addressed further correspondence to the Speaker of the National Assembly, identifying the names of the four candidates that she intended appointing, namely Dr Keabetswe Modimoeng, Mr Peter Zimri, Advocate Luthando Mkumatela and Ms Yolisa Kedama.
The Minister addressed a third letter to the Speaker of the National Assembly later that day, identifying the names of two additional candidates that she intended appointing if her request to appoint only four Councillors was not agreed to, namely Dr Charles Lewis and Ms Dikeledi Mushi.

On 14 July 2020, the Committee met to consider the three letters from the Minister and made the following observations and recommendations: 1 4 1.
Observations (i) The Committee has complied with the procedural steps to fill the current vacancies on the ICASA Council, including advertising the vacancies, short listing candidates, allowing public participation, conducting interviews and finally reaching a unanimous decision on the names to be recommended.

Furthermore, the National Assembly concluded the process of identifying suitable candidates when it adopted the 10 names on 9 June 2020.
(ii) The Minister has exercised her discretion as provided for in the ICASA Act by considering the 10 names from which she recommended the following six names: 2 5 NAME GENDER QUALIFICATIONS EXPERTISE Dr Charles Lewis Male Ms Dikeledi MushiFemale Finance Business systems Corporate governance ICT Policy regulation Corporate governance Doctor of Philosophy M. Com Management of Information Systems, BA Honours in English, Bachelor of Arts Degree Higher Education Diploma Master’s in Management Degree in ICT Policy and Regulation BA Honours in Industrial Sociology Bachelor of Arts (iii) The Committee is of the view that the requirements in terms of section 5(3)(b) of the ICASA Act would be met with the following selection as proposed by the Committee, however the Committee differs with the Minister in respect of one candidate only.
3 6 (iv) The Committee supports the Minister’s choice of candidates 1 to 5.

(v) However, the Committee is of the view that the recommendation to appoint Ms D Mushi would result in the provisions of section 5(3)(B)(ii) of the ICASA Act not being met.
The relevant section reads as follows: “(3) Persons appointed to the Council must be persons who— (b) when viewed collectively— (i) are representative of a broad cross-section of the population of the Republic; and (ii) possess suitable qualifications, expertise and experience in the fields of, amongst others, broadcasting, electronic communications and postal policy or operations, public policy development, electronic engineering, law, information technology, content in any form, consumer protection, education, economics, finance or any other relevant expertise or qualifications.” 4 7 (vi) The Committee, having considered the candidates’ skills set as recommended by the Minister, is of the view that the crucial skill of postal services experience is lacking.
The Committee is further of the view that only Mr ZK Mathews possesses postal services experience, which it deems necessary for the effective functioning of the Council.

The Committee notes that whilst Ms D Mushi possesses expertise in ICT Policy and Regulation, five candidates already possess this skill, over and above the broader skills and expertise they possess individually.
(vii) The legal opinion received from the Constitutional and Legal Services Office in Parliament dated 14 July 2020 affirmed the discretion of the Minister and the Committee’s compliance with the process in terms of the ICASA Act.

It is in the interest of South Africans and necessary for the stability and functioning of ICASA, as well as in the interest of the communications sector, that the appointment process of ICASA Councillors be urgently completed.
There are currently only three Councillors, which may lead to ineffective and compromised governance of ICASA at a critical time when the ICASA Council has crucial decisions to make.

2.
Recommendations The Committee unanimously recommends that the National Assembly: (i) (ii) rejects the request by the Minister to fill four vacancies; accepts the first five names submitted by the Minister in as far as these names are drawn from the list of preferred candidates adopted by the National Assembly; informed by (a) the appointment process the Committee undertook; (b) the broad sense of skills set required, responding to the convergence phenomena and as annotated in legislation; (c) the individual performance of candidates during the interviews; (d) the demographics of the country; and (e) other imperatives such as gender balance; and (iii) requests that the Minister, in terms of section 5(1B)(b) of the ICASA Act, review her recommendation in respect of one of her proposed candidates (number six - Ms Dikeledi Mushi) and consider the appointment of Mr Zolani Matthews, who brings the expertise and experience in the postal sector, which are skills necessary for ICASA to realise its regulatory objectives of a converged sector.
Report to be considered.

5 8 6 9 2.

Report of the Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs on the draft notice determining the remuneration of Commissioners of the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) for 2019/20, dated 21 July 2020.

The Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs, having considered the draft notice of the President’s determination of the salaries and allowances of members of various institutions, including Commissioners of the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC), reports as follows: 1.
A letter, dated 26 March 2020, was received from the President of the Republic, requesting the National Assembly to consider the draft notice of determination of the salaries and allowances of members of various institutions, including the Commissioners of the Electoral Commission of South Africa in terms of the Determination of Remuneration of Office-Bearers of Independent Constitutional Institutions Laws Amendment Act, 2014 (Act No.
22 of 2014) retrospectively for 2019/20, usually required by the end of the financial year but having been delayed by the Covid 19 Pandemic related disruptions.

2.

On 8 April 2020 and again on 30 June 2020, the matter was referred to the Committee for consideration and report.

3.
3.

Section 219(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides that national legislation must establish frameworks for determining the salaries, allowances and benefits of judges, the Public Protector, the Auditor-General, and members of any commission provided for in the Constitution, including the Electoral Commission referred to in section 192 of the Constitution.

4.
4.

The Determination of Remuneration of Office-Bearers of Independent Constitutional Institutions Laws Amendment Act, 2014 (Act No.

22 of 2014), which came into operation on 1 April 2019, creates the necessary framework to determine the salaries of office-bearers of Chapter 9 institutions mentioned in the Constitution.

5.
5.

Section 7 (2) of the Electoral Act 73 of 1998 provides that the conditions of service, remuneration, allowances and other benefits of Commissioners shall from time to time be determined by the President after consultation with the Commission on Remuneration of Representatives established by section 2 of the Commission on the Remuneration of Representatives Act, 1994 (Act 37 of 1994), and a distinction may be made between commissioners appointed in a full-time and part-time capacity.

10 6.
10 6.

The Independent Commission for Public Office Bearers gazetted its recommendations on 13 February 2020 (GG No.

43019, 13 February 2020), having consulted with the institutions concerned and the relevant Minsters to better understand the remuneration of office-bearers in the various independent constitutional institutions, as well as related concerns and challenges.
Pending a major salary review, the Independent Commission recommended that the office-bearers be treated in line with other public office-bearers receiving: • A 3% adjustment to the remuneration of all categories of public office bearers earning above R1 500 000; and • 4% for all categories earning below R1 500 000.

7.
7.

Having taken into account the serious economic challenges that the country faces and the constrained fiscal environment, the President, however, has proposed: • A salary-freeze for office-bearers earning R1.5 million and above.

• A 2.8% adjustment for office-bearers earning between R1 million and R1.5 million.

• A 4.5% adjustment for office-bearers earning below R1 million.

8.

The Independent Commission for Public Office Bearers notice gazetted on 13 February 2020 (GG No.
43019, 13 February 2020), indicates that the Chairperson and full-time Commissioners of the IEC all earn salaries above R1.5 million.

Part-time Commissioners are entitled to a daily sitting rate or hourly sitting rate calculated on a basic salary of a Judge of the High Court.

9.

The one part-time IEC Commissioner is a Judge and as such is remunerated in terms of section 2(4) of the Judges’ Remuneration and Conditions of Employment Act 2001, (Act No 47 of 2001).
The Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services, having considered Draft Notice determining the rate at which salaries, allowances and benefits are payable to Constitutional Court judges and other judges annually with effect from 1 April 2019, tabled for approval the Draft Notice to also allocate no salary increase for the 2019/20.

2 11 Recommendation 10.


The Committee, having deliberated, concur with the President’s determination on the remuneration adjustment of IEC Commissioners, that a retrospective salary freeze or 0% increase be implemented for the Chairperson and other full-time Commissioners given their salary level for the 2019/20 financial year.

For the part-time Commissioner, a similar freeze will thus apply to the daily/hourly rate which they received for 2019/20 over and above the salary freeze applicable to Judges.
The Committee recommends that the National Assembly approve the draft notice determining the remuneration of the Commissioners of the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC).

Report to be considered.

3 12 3.


REPORT OF THE OVERSIGHT VISIT BY THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS TO THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING WORKS HEAD OFFICE, PRETORIA GAUTENG, DATED 17 JUNE 2020 The Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs (the Committee) having conducted an oversight visit to the Government Printing Works (GPW) head office in Pretoria, Gauteng on 21 July 2020, reports as follows: 1.

INTRODUCTION 1.1.

The Committee conducted an oversight visit to the GPW in Gauteng, Pretoria on 17 June 2020.
The Committee exercises oversight over the Department of Home Affairs (DHA), GPW and the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC).

1.2.

The oversight visit was conducted due to the submission to the Committee on 13 April 2020 by Mr Ngwambi, who raised serious allegations against the Acting Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of GPW, Ms A. Fosi, and the Minister of Home Affairs, Dr PA Motsoaledi, MP.
Mr Ngwambi requested urgent investigation of the appointment and conduct of the GPW CEO by the Minister of Home Affairs.

1.3.

The Committee raised these concerns and inquired on allegations with the Minister of Home Affairs during two Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs meeting held in May 2020.
The Minister informed the Committee that he is aware of the allegations and he had referred the matter to the Public Service Commission (PSC) and the Directorate for Priority Crimes Investigations (known as the HAWKS) for investigation and he will report to Parliament once the investigations were complete.

1.3.

The Minister of Home Affairs presented the PSC Report and findings in relations to the allegations levelled against Ms A. Fosi during the Committee meeting held on 2 June 2020.
The PSC report did not find any evidence to suggest wrongdoing by Ms A. Fosi on the initial allegations levelled against her.

1.4.

The Committee did not adopt the PSC Report but recognised its legal standing.

The Committee further noted other matters have been referred to the HAWKS thus the Committee will only adopt the PSC Report once the HAWKS investigation has been completed.

1.5.
1.5.

The Committee also resolved during the meeting on 2 June 2020 that while it awaits completion of the HAWKS investigation, will be necessary to conduct an oversight visit to the GPW to engage the labour representatives of Public Service (PSA) and the National Education, Health and Allied Workers' Union (NEHAWU) to satisfy itself on the allegations levelled against Ms A. Fosi.

2.

DELEGATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND ATTENDENTS 2.1.


It must be noted that Members of the Committee from the Democratic Alliance (DA) have recused themselves for the oversight visit.

Their correspondence on the matter is attached.

13 2.2.

Committee Members: i. Hon.

B.Bongo (Chairperson/ANC).

ii.

Hon.

M. Chabane (ANC) iii.

Hon.

T. Legwase (ANC) iv.

Hon.

A. Molekwa (ANC) v. Hon.

Lerato Tito (EFF) vi.

Hon.

Mr T. Lekota (COPE) 2.3.


Mr Pakamile Hlungwani (Parliamentary Support Staff/ Research Unit) 2.4.

Department of Home Affairs i. Dr A. Motsoaledi ii.

Mr S. Qoza iii.

Mr Mongomarele iv.

Mr M.F.

Makua (Cabinet Liaison Officer) v. Mr M. Njoko (Director: Integrated Governance) 2.5.

Government Printing Works i. Ms A. Fosi (Acting CEO) ii.

Mr B.Baboojee (Acting Chief Financial Officer) iii.

Ms M. Modise (General Manager: Human Resources) 2.6.

Labour Representatives i. Mr P.J.


Mojanago (PSA Branch Chairperson at GPW).

ii.

Mr J. Mashigo (PSA National Office) iii.

Mr B. Mungedzi (NEHAWU/ GPW) iv.

Mr A. Mashimbye (NEHAWU/GPW) 3.

THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST GPW ACTING CEO AND MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS 3.1.

The Public Service Association (PSA) i.

Allegations against the Acting CEO, Ms A. Fosi and the Minister of Home Affairs as presented by PSA representatives are similar to the one’s represented by Mr Gwambi in his email to the Committee.
Ms Fosi has allegations against her of corruption, mismanagement, victimisation of staff, soliciting bribes, interference in the supply chain, nepotism, and abuse of international travel by misleading the Minster.

ii.

The Minster of Home Affairs has decided to short-list and interview Ms Fosi for the permanent position of the CEO at Government Printing Works.
He further alleges that certain members of the public and the private sector are campaigning for the favourable consideration of Ms Fosi’s application, and that this campaign is related to future strategic projects GPW must undertake in the next five years.

iii.

Ms Fosi lacks adequate skills, qualifications and experience necessary for the position of the CEO, and she does not have relevant skills set as per the job advert requirements.

iv.
iv.

Ms Fosi will compromise the existence, operations and the future of GPW.

2 14 v. Ms Fosi has been making unnecessary changes to GPW including bullying of the EXCO members, due to her close proximity to the Minister of Home Affairs.

vi.

Ms Fosi as the acting GPW CEO, has recently organised a strategic workshop in an exotic hotel in Bela-Bela, in order to give business to her closest friends.

This workshop was unnecessary and it could have been held in a boardroom or cheaper venue.
The workshop was the “epic of corruption, where suppliers were given business without following proper procurement procedures”.

The Minister of Home Affairs did not investigate this matter.

The workshop costs incurred by GPW were more than R500,000 without any tangible business benefits, expect one document.

vii.
vii.

Ms Fosi has mislead the Minister of Home Affairs to approve a business trip to France, where her close friends were booked business class flights, for a workshop which was unnecessary, and people who went to the trip were very irrelevant.

The trip was done to favour certain individuals.

viii.

The PSA representatives indicated that efforts and attempts to get the Minister to attend to all the allegations, which were presented to the Minister from February 2020, proved to be futile.
He alleged further that he has also written to the Minister of Home Affairs to withdraw Ms Fosi for the permanent appointment of the CEO at GPW.

He has also ostensibly informed the Minister of Home Affairs that he is making this submission to the Portfolio Committee as well as the Department of Public Service and Administration through the Minister Mchunu.

ix.

Affairs to adequately address this matter and has now decided to escalate this matter to the Committee for immediate intervention.
It is alleged that the Minister of Home Affairs is intending to appoint Ms Fosi, despite the numerous serious allegations against her.

3.2.

Presentation by NEHAWU representatives i. NEHAWU representatives disputed allegations made by the PSA representatives against Ms A. Fosi and Minister of Home Affairs.

In their view, the PSA is the one causing instability and animosity amongst employees at GPW.

ii.
ii.

NEHAWU alleges that PSA Chairperson at GPW, Mr Mojanaga, is angry at the acting CEO because she does not succumb to his threats.

The PSA Chairperson at GPW want Ms Fosi to be dismissed and is misusing the Parliamentary process as a fight back strategy against the acting CEO of GPW.

iii.

NEHAWU alleges that PSA is the one threatening employees, including senior managers who do not agree with their stance on any issues.
According to NEHAWU representatives, it is the PSA which has disruptive tendencies bordering on hooliganism and lawlessness.

For instance, the Chairperson of PSA at GPW has mobilised unknown people who are not employees of GPW to disrupt interviews during the staffing session of Security Personnel during 2019.

The Acting CEO of GPW had to call the South African Police Services in order to continue with the interviews.

iv.
iv.

NEHAWU representatives alleges that PSA want tenders issued by the GPW to go to the companies favoured by the Chairperson of PSA at GPW.

v. NEHAWU representatives agree that GPW senior management should foster good working relationship at GPW and must strive for good governance at all times.

vi.

NEHAWU agree that some disciplinary issues against senior managers, including the alleged assault allegation levelled against the CEO could have been handled better.

3 15 4.
3 15 4.

RESPONSES BY THE ACTING CEO, Ms A. FOSI The Acting CEO, MS A. Fosi responded to the allegations levelled against her as follows: i.

The Acting CEO of GPW disputes all the allegations levelled against her by the Branch Chairperson of PSA at GPW.

She dismisses the allegation with the contempt it deserves and deems them to be malicious attempt to prevent her from doing her job and fostering good governance.

ii.
ii.

Ms A. Fosi disputes allegations that she does not have relevant academic qualifications and experience to act as CEO of GPW.

Ms A. Fosi has a Master’s degree and two post- graduate diplomas.

She further has 24 years’ experience in government of which 14 years were senior Management.

iii.

The Minister of Home Affairs and Ms A. Fosi presented proof that the trip to France was an authorised official trip.
The trip was approved during the Executive Committee (EXCO) meeting at GPW and was supported by the Minister of Home Affairs.

The Acting CEO attended the Security Printing Seminar in France with other two relevant members of the GPW as approved by the Minister following recommendations of the EXCO of GPW.

iv.

The Acting CEO is of a view that the Branch Chairperson of PSA at GPW is disgruntled because she took away power from the unions.
Ms Fosi argued that there has been a culture of the labour unions exercising too much power which has nothing to do with labour issues and she will not let the culture continue.

The Branch Chairperson of PSA interfered on issues not related to him as a Security Director or labour representative.

He concentrates more on union work than the job he has been employed to do at GPW.

v. The Bela-Bela Strategic Retreat was an authorised GPW business meeting to draw up its strategic plans.
The Acing CEO has not interfered with the procurement process and the investigations conducted by the PSA have not found any wrongdoing from her part.

vi.

The Acting CEO stated that there will be no retaliation against the Branch Chairperson of PSA at GPW for reporting her to the Minister of Home Affairs and Parliament.
However, the Minister and Committee should note that she has received correspondence from Private Security Industry Authority (PSIRA) that the Director of Security, who happens to be the Branch Chairperson of PSA at GPW, had his certification withdrawn for none compliance therefore, he cannot continue to work in in his current capacity as he does not comply with the requirements of the PSIRA Act.

5.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSE BY THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS 5.1.
The Minister of Home Affairs stated that he accepts the PSC findings.

The Minister encourages anyone who disputes the PSC Report on the allegations levelled against the Acting CEO of GPW to challenge it thought duly empowered institutions.

5.2.

The Minister has confirmed that the Acting CEO has the required qualification and experience to act or be appointed at her current acting position should she become the best candidate following the outcome of the interviews to fill in the post of CEO at GPW.
The process to appoint the permanent CEO is underway and the appointment will be done once all processes have been concluded and approved by Cabinet.

4 16 5.3.

The Minister confirmed that he has authorised the Security Printing Seminar in France attended by Ms A. Fosi and her two colleagues at GPW.

The Minister had satisfied himself that the trip was in line with GPW business and the relevant delegation was authorised to attend the seminar.

5.4.
5.4.

The Minister informed the Committee that there are Curriculum Vitae’s which were stolen from GPW.

He has reported the matter to SAPS for investigation.

5.5.

The Minister informed the Committee that the Acting CEO is being threatened at GPW and the tyres of her car were slashed.

He indicated that the matter was also reported to SAPS and he further requested protection for the Acting CEO of GPW.

5.6.
5.6.

The Minister disputes that he has a personal and business relationship with Ms A. Fosi as alleged by Mr Gwabi and the PSA representatives.

The Minister confirms that the only relations he has with Ms A. Fosi is that of the Minister and the CEO of the entity under his department, the same way he has cordial relations with other senior officials under his Ministry, DHA and entities.

6.

RESPONSES AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS 6.1.
Committee Members thanked the Minister, Acting CEO of GPW and labour union representatives from PSA and NEHAWU for their time and presentations.

6.2.

The Committee accept that even though it has not yet adopted the PSC report, it recognises its legal standing.

The Committee has resolved that the PSC report will be adopted/ or not adopted once the HAWKS investigation is completed as agreed during the Committee Meeting on 2 June 2020.

6.3.
6.3.

The Committee noted that the PSA disputed the PSC Report, however, unless it has been challenged through a duly authorised body, the PSC Report remains and its legal standing is confirmed.

6.4.

The Committee notes with concern that PSA, and in particular the Branch Chairperson of PSA at GPW is abusing the Parliamentary process to settle personal scores with the Acting CEO of GPW.

6.5.
6.5.

The Committee encouraged the Acting CEO to continue conducting her duties without fear or favour within the prescripts of the law.

The CEO is also encouraged to foster cordial relationship amongst the senior managers, labour representatives and GPW employees in general.

6.6.

The Committee has noted that GPW performance has improved under the stewardship of the current Acting CEO and commended her and her team for the good work.
The Committee further notes the Auditor General findings of 2017/18 financial year are being attended to.

6.7.

The Committee advised the Minister to ensure that the PSIRA directives regarding security officials who are not compliant would be implemented without further delay.

The 5 17 Committee expect a report from the Minister of Home Affairs on the actions taken during the next Committee meeting on the date to be communicated.

6.8.
6.8.

The Committee notes that a police investigation is underway regarding the missing Curriculum Vitae’s (CV’s) of advertised posts which were supposed to have been filled.

However, the Minister of Home Affairs should hold the Acting CEO accountable for the missing CV’s.

The Committee expect a report from the Acting CEO on the actions taken against those responsible for safeguarding the CV’s.

6.9.

The Committee noted the practice of senior managers who are also shop stewards.
Even though there is no law preventing such practice, the Committee discourage it because of potential conflict of interests.

6.10.

The Committee informed the GPW employees that they can make further written representations to the Committee should they need to do so.

6.11.

The Committee noted that GPW has an excess of R2 billion earmarked for the construction of the new Headquarters.
GPW has not been able to proceed with the construction of the new HQ because the Department of Public Works (DPW) was not able to complete the tender process.

The Committee has supported the decision by the Minister of Home Affairs to issue the construction tender on their own, but should also appoint relevant professionals to project manage the construction.

The CEO of GPW should present plans to the Committee on how they are going to proceed on the matter.

Report to be considered 6 18