Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1698927123776.pdf (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines)
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (EMF) FOR REGIONAL DISASTER VULNERABILITY REDUCTION PROJECT (RDVRP) St. Vincent and the Grenadines Component January, 2014; revised February 2014; April 2014; February 2016 Prepared by: Reynold Murray; revised by the Ministry of Economic Planning, Sustainable Development, Industry, Labour and Information Prepared for: Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines ACRONYMS Best Management Practice AF Additional Financing APL Adaptable Program Lending BMP CWSA Central Water and Sewerage Authority DVRP Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project EA Environmental Assessment EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMF Environmental Management Framework EMP Environmental Management Plan ENSO El Niño Southern Oscillation ILO International Labor Organization LBS Land Based Sources (of marine pollution) MEAs Multilateral Environmental Agreements OECS Organization of East Caribbean States OP Operational Policy PPU Physical Planning Unit PPDB Physical Planning and Development Board PSIPMU Public Sector Investment Project Management Unit RDVRP Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project SGD St. Georges Declaration (of Principles for sustainable development in the OECS) SVG St. Vincent and the Grenadines SWMA Solid Waste Management Authority UNCBD United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change VINLEC Vincentian Electricity Services WB World Bank Page 2 of 106 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (GoSVG) is collaborating with the World Bank (WB) to implement a Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project (RDVRP) which aims to measurably reduce vulnerability to natural hazards and the adverse impacts of climate change in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG).
The XCD 165.4 million SVG RDVRP was declared effective by the WB on September 9, 2011, and is being implemented over a seven (7) year period that ends on December 31, 2018.

It is 100% financed by credits of USD 46.52 million from the International Development Agency, Strategic Climate Fund Pilot Program for Climate Resilience grants of USD 12 million, and a Strategic Climate Fund Loan of USD 3 million.

Additional Financing (AF) is being sought for the RDVRP project.
This Environmental Management Framework (EMF) updates and expands on the previously prepared EMF, which provides screening methods and procedures for the application of Bank safeguards, including guidance on the scope of studies necessary to complete for each subproject, criteria for triggering additional studies in the case of complex or significant activities, and a generic Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for use in simple situations where activities need no additional assessment.
It is likely that the majority of works will be relatively minor in nature and involve simple civil works where the environmental impacts are limited to the construction phase, requiring only the application of a standardized generic EMP.

However, any exceptions will be identified during screening in the EMF, and subject to additional assessment work.

Project works will be undertaken on mainland SVG - Bequia, and Union Island.
Works contemplated relate to the repair and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure, retrofitting of key government buildings and new facility construction (particularly satellite warehouses), geotechnical studies and engineering supervision for slope stabilization along critical road segments, river defense works and coastal erosion protection studies, the rehabilitation of feeder roads and the repair of a jetty.
The possible project locations have been field-checked by World Bank staff have been inventoried and assessed in preliminary form through this EMF safeguards instrument which also includes a top-level Environmental Assessment (EA) to describe the environmental impacts of the project on a program-wide level.

In addition this EMF includes an EMP with environmental safeguards to guide the implementation of relatively simple civil works for which no additional assessment would be required.
This EMF describes the environmental impacts of the project on a program wide level.

The EMF is the appropriate environmental management tool to be used for future subprojects as detailed information on particular specific sub-projects under the RDVRP have yet to be fully defined.

General guidelines have been provided to assist in identifying potential impacts, mitigate potential negative impacts, statutory administration, and responsibilities as best as possible.
An EMP with standard mitigation management measures has also been prepared and should be incorporated into the civil works contract as clauses to guide the contractor and to also form a basis for monitoring during implementation.
Any additional detailed mitigation measures developed by specific studies (EIAs) for complex or sensitive subproject activities, or any additional environmental requirements imposed by St. Vincentian law and regulations, would Page 3 of 106 also be translated into performance requirements for the contractors through civil works contracting clauses and verified by monitoring during implementation.
Page 4 of 106 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Project Description................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 List and Description of Subprojects .................................................................................... 10 2.0 LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 17 2.1 Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................... 17 2.2 World Bank Safeguard Policies .......................................................................................... 19 2.3 National Regulatory Framework......................................................................................... 22 2.4 Environmental Management Capacities ............................................................................. 23 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT .......................................................... 24 3.1 St. Vincent and the Grenadines General Context ............................................................... 24 3.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Topography and Drainage................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Current Climate ................................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Socio-economy and Human Settlement
 .............................................................................. 30 3.6 Biological Resources .......................................................................................................... 33 3.7 Geo-hazards ........................................................................................................................ 35 3.8 Physical Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... 38 4.0 PROJECTED IMPACTS ..................................................................................................... 40 4.1 Analysis of Projected Impacts ............................................................................................ 40 4.1.1 Positive Impacts ........................................................................................................... 45 4.1.2 Negative Impacts ......................................................................................................... 46 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES ............................................................................................... 50 5.1 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 50 6.0 SCREENING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................ 55 6.1 Screening Processes ............................................................................................................ 55 6.2 Local Permitting.................................................................................................................. 56 6.3 Screening Criteria and Checklists ....................................................................................... 57 6.3.1 Relatively Complex Sub-projects ................................................................................ 57 6.3.2 Relatively Simple
 Sub-projects.................................................................................... 59 6.4 Emergency Procedures ........................................................................................................ 59 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................. 61 Page 5 of 106 7.1 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 61 7.2 Environmental Performance Clauses for Works Contracts ................................................ 65 7.3 Supervision, Monitoring, and Reporting ............................................................................ 66 8.0 DISCLOSURE WORKSHOP / PUBLIC CONSULTATION .......................................... 68 9.0 TECHNICAL REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 70 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 72 Appendix 1 – Project Environmental Screening Checklist Form - Part 1 ................................ 73 Appendix 2 – Project Environmental Screening Checklist Form - Part 2 ................................ 76 Appendix 3 – Guidelines for Using the Project Environmental Screening Checklist .............. 78 Appendix 4 – Guidelines for Preparing an EIS ........................................................................ 81 Appendix 5 – Best Management Practices for Erosion Control ............................................... 87 Appendix 6 – Best Management Practices for Slope Stabilization .......................................... 89 Appendix 7 – Other Best Management Practices ..................................................................... 93 Appendix 8 – Typical Environmental Contract Clauses ........................................................... 94 Appendix 9 – Disclosure Workshop / Public Consultation
 .................................................... 104 Appendix 10 – Redisclosure ................................................................................................... 106 Page 6 of 106 Figures Title Page a, b 10 11 Tables 1 2 3a 3b 4 5 6 Location Map of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Geological Map of St. Vincent Topographic Map of St. Vincent Major Watersheds Used for Water Supply in St. Vincent Major Watersheds in Use in St. Vincent Mean Annual Monthly Rainfall for St. Vincent 1987-2008 Hurricane Track in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico Population Distribution Land Use Map of St. Vincent Important Bird Area and Protected Area in St. Vincent Volcanic Hazard Zone Storm Surge and Coastal Erosion Summary of Pertinent Agencies, Supporting Legislation and Scope World Bank Project Categories Impact Matrix: List of RDVRP Projects Approved Impact Matrix: Proposed Projects Impact Areas and Mitigation Measures 22 24 25 26 26 27 28 30 33 35 36 15 18 38 41 50 Identification Activities of Complex/Sensitive Sub-projects or 58 Standard Minimum Elements of Management Plan (EMP) the Environmental 61 Page 7 of 106 LIST OF APPENDICES 1.
Project Environmental Screening Checklist Form – Part 1 2.

Project Environmental Screening Checklist Form – Part 2 3.

Guidelines for Using the Project Environmental Screening Checklist.

4.

Guidelines for Preparing an EIS 5.

Best Management Practices for Erosion Control 6.

Best Management Practices for Slope Stabilization 7.

Other Best Management Practices 8.

Typical Environmental Contract Clauses 9.

Disclosure Workshop / Public Consultation 10.


Redisclosure Notice Page 8 of 106 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description The GoSVG with the assistance of the WB is implementing the RDVRP as part of the Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Program Adaptable Program Lending (APL) for the East Caribbean Region.

The Program aims at measurably reducing vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change impacts in the Eastern Caribbean Sub-region.
The achievement of the Program Development Objectives would be measured using the following key indicators: (a) Reduced risk of OECS population to failure of public buildings and infrastructure due to natural hazards or climate change impacts; and (b) Increased capacity of OECS Governments to identify and monitor climate risk and impacts.
The objective of the RDVRP in SVG is to measurably reduce vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change impacts and to create some level of resilience at a national level, as well as to include various activities related to institutional strengthening and training.
According to the Bank’s Environmental Assessment (EA) Policy (Operational Policy OP 4.01), the RDVRP is classified as Category B, meaning that environmental impacts for the type of work anticipated under the project are expected to be moderate in nature and can be managed through the application of appropriate engineering and management measures.
A program-level EMF updated the existing EA and included guidance during project execution for screening possible subprojects and identify complex projects which would require additional studies to comply with safeguards policies.

All future subprojects which are as yet not identified in detail are included in a single EMF document.
The EMF will serve as a screening procedure for work activities and subprojects designed to identify potential environmental impacts, provide standardized mitigation measures in the form of an EMP, and identify works requiring additional assessment during project execution.
The EMF and its procedures have been prepared in a form to be incorporated into the Project Operations Manual and will serve as a guide for environmental management of future subprojects or activities once they are defined in sufficient detail for execution.

The EMF as a public document, serves to inform stakeholders and guide environmental management of activities to be implemented.
1.2 Background An important issue confronting SVG’s development is the vulnerability of its population and economy to natural disasters, which can seriously impact the productive sectors of the economy, such as agriculture and tourism, with particularly severe effects on communities and households.

Natural disasters impose large costs on the country’s fragile economy and exacerbate poverty levels.
Page 9 of 106 The island's natural resource base is crucial to the future of the country’s economy and must be considered in any national resilience building program or plan.

Development pressures and systemic deficiencies have resulted in substantial damage to critical infrastructure, housing, and livelihoods during disasters.
Poor land use planning and associated squatter developments, deforestation and developments in disaster prone areas have exacerbated vulnerabilities to climate change impacts and in particular climate related disasters.
Most of the island’s major human settlements, and associated infrastructure (telecommunications, roads, airports and seaports), are located along the narrow coastal belt and are at direct risk from extreme weather activity, sea level rise and storm surges, rain-induced landslides on steep slopes, and flooding and inundation, posing threats to lives, livelihoods and socio-economic activity.
Areas of bare soil exposed by landslides are highly susceptible to erosion; and with even moderate rain can directly affect already damaged water intakes and result in heavy siltation which can cause widespread flooding, and downstream effects on the marine environment.

The scale and complexity of the landslides and debris flows have posed enormous challenges to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as the rehabilitation efforts outstripp local capacity in terms of technical expertise and finance.
Individual project activities with potentially significant environmental impacts will likely focus on small- to mid-sized civil works to be executed under the proposed project.

Works activities include retrofitting of structures to improve disaster resilience, road works and bridge construction/rehabilitation including the possibility of road realignment, sea defenses, and building improvements and new construction.

Several specific individual subprojects have already been identified and prioritized.
A number of other possible subprojects have not yet been specifically identified, but the types of activities and civil works are known in general terms, with detailed design pending.

1.3 List and Description of Subprojects (a) Satellite Warehouses in Rose Hall, Sandy Bay, Bequia, Mesopotamia, Georgetown, Union Island.

These buildings will be less than 1000 square feet in plan and will be constructed from reinforced concrete and concrete block.
The activities will include • Excavation for foundations approximately 3 feet deep 2 feet wide around the perimeter • of the building.

Installation of reinforcement and casting of concrete in trench for a strip footing 2 feet wide by 1 foot thick.

• Backfilling of trench with excavated material.

• • Spreading and compacting gravel material within perimeter block-work to receive 6 Installation of block-work around building perimeter to 1 foot above grade.

inch reinforced (BRC) concrete floor.


• Backfilling of trench with excavated material.

Page 10 of 106 • Erection of concrete block external walls to 12 feet height with upper level ventilation blocks and inline reinforced concrete columns.

• Casting of reinforced concrete roof.

• Levelling of external yard to receive compacted gravel base course and 6 inch reinforced (BRC) concrete pavement.

• Erection of perimeter chain-link fencing and gate.

• Provision of external drains.


• Provision of electrical and plumbing utilities to building with external septic tank and soakpit.

(b) Retrofitting of Emergency Shelters at Kingstown and Dorsetshire Government Schools, and the Union Island Learning Resource Center (LRC).

The retrofitting and rehabilitation works on the schools and the LRC have been designed.

The Dorsetshire Hill school requires the demolition, rehabilitation and extension of the existing building and associated external works.
In this case the construction activities will basically follow that of the Emergency shelters.

The Kingstown school building will require a complete roof demolition and rebuild of the old block, the installation of windows and shutters, and the construction of a new bathroom block.
The LRC will require the demolition and remodelling of the ground floor bathroom, the installation of shutters for existing windows, remedial works to existing water tank, replacing the external security lighting on the building.

In these works provision must be made to identify the presence of asbestos components in the roof structures.

Asbestos disposal methodologies would then be used.

These methodologies are well established and bear no repeat here.
Standard mitigation measures for disposal of asbestos- containing materials are provided in Annex 10 of this EMF.

(c) Bridges and Fords on Fenton to Green Hill Road.

Analysis of these four bridges (spans less than 30 feet) and three fords have been conducted by a consultant.

The final designs are being executed by a consultant.

It is expected that the works will include the full demolition and rebuild of the bridges.
Associated reconstruction activities for the bridges will include: • Upgrading of access roads to the bridges, placing and compacting base course material on existing road.

• Demolition of reinforced concrete bridges using a combination of jackhammer and tracked excavator equipment.

This equipment would have to track up the existing road, as opposed to being transported with a trailer.

Demolished material will be hauled away to a designated disposal site.
• New bridges road width will be approximately 22 feet wide.

Page 11 of 106 • Concrete production will likely be done on site due to access challenges.

This will involve the haulage of sand, aggregate and cement to the various locations.

• Bridge reconstruction will involve excavation at least 4 feet below river bed to cast reinforced concrete abutments.

• Bridge deck construction will involve the installation of formwork, reinforcement and the casting of concrete.
• Activities will also include the construction of 100 meters of concrete road before and after each bridge location (a total of 800m).

This will involve some road widening, embankment excavation , construction of box drains (18 inches wide by 12 inches high), placement and compaction of gravel base course and casting of 6 inch reinforced concrete pavement.

• Construction activities for the fords will include the demolition of the existing minor concrete swale structures.
• Excavation for three feet diameter minimum concrete culverts, with upstream and downstream concrete headwalls and downstream gabion slope protection to prevent water scour.

Vegetation in the riverbeds and adjoining riparian areas, as well as in forest areas in the hilltops above the roadway areas, appears to be relatively well preserved based on a preliminary view.
Accordingly, the potential environmental aspects of the civil works will be closely examined and the appropriate mitigation measures designed, as described later in this EMF.

(d) Middle Bridge over South River Kingstown, Bay Street Bridge over North River Kingstown Work on these sub-projects will include: • Demolition of the existing bridge decks and abutments.
• Reconstruction of new reinforced concrete single span bridges will require temporary diversions which are available at both locations over adjacent bridges • No piling is anticipated at the abutments • Some upstream and downstream embankment and channel improvement work (concrete) is required at both locations as part of bridge contract.

More extensive channel improvement work will be contracted separately to extend between 500m to 1000m upstream of the bridges.
(e) Slope Stabilisation Design studies for slope stabilization works at Dark View, Petit Bordel, Rose Bank, Maroon Hill, German Gutter, English Gutter, Ginger Village, Mt Greenan and Spring have commenced.

A design study for slope stabilisation and road realignment at Coull’s Hill and Belle Isle is also underway.

The anticipated interventions will include the following activities.
• For Rose Bank, Dark View, Petit Bordel and Mt Greenan, the anticipated interventions are reductions in the slope gradient using a combination of both re-sloping and benching.

This will involve the excavation and removal of earthwork with large amounts at Mt Page 12 of 106 Greenan (60,000 cubic yards) with excavators and the haulage via trucks to a designated disposal site.

Replanting of the slope is also anticipated.


• For Ginger Village, the anticipated intervention will include a combination of reinforced concrete retaining walls, benching, planting of vegetation and control of rainfall runoff.

Activities associated with the construction of retaining walls at this location will probably require the construction of a temporary access road to the wall locations.
The location of the walls may be at the top adjacent to the road as well as the toe and a few intermediate locations.

The retaining walls themselves will require excavation for the footing, erection of formwork and reinforcement and the casting of concrete.

The control of rainfall run- off may require the construction of a concrete box drain.
• At German Gutter and English Gutter, the anticipated interventions are reinforced concrete retaining walls and gabion basket slope protection to mitigate scour from drainage run-off.

• At Maroon Hill, reinforced concrete retaining walls will be required.

• At Spring, the slope protection here will probably be a reinforced concrete sea wall at the toe of the cliff.

The construction will require an excavator to track down the coastal embankment to the beach to carry out the excavation works.
This could cause some permanent damage to the slope, therefore the appropriate restoration and revegetation will be designed and included in the contract scope of work.

• At Coull’s Hill, the upgrade and improved resilience of approximately 500m of road with widening, drainage and slope protection works (gabion baskets, reinforced concrete retaining walls, benching of slopes, surface water control and tree planting).
• At Belle Isle, the upgrade and improved resilience of approximately 100m of road with widening, drainage and slope protection works (gabion baskets, reinforced concrete retaining walls, benching of slopes, surface water control, and tree planting).

• At Paget Farm road in Bequia, consulting services to carry out feasibility and pre- engineering studies and preparation of preliminary designs and reliable cost estimates.
In cases where only feasibility designs or studies will be undertaken, those feasibility studies will include information relevant to the EIAs which would be required for the actions eventually being considered as viable alternatives, either as the preparation of the EIA itself, or as a scoping and identification of the EIA requirements and associated cost estimates to develop the EIA.
(f) Georgetown Coastal Defence A Final Design Study for the protection of the Georgetown coasts is expected to commence soon.

Concept designs are substantially complete.

North of the playing field the designs comprise of a rock armour revetment with some land reclamation.

This land reclamation aspect is currently being finalised.

The plan is to reclaim sufficient space to construct a seaside road, vending strip and small recreational space e.g.

beach volleyball court.


These facilities are expected to add commercial value to the project as opposed to providing a pure sea defense structure.

South of the playing field, the intervention is a combination of groynes and bio engineering.

The construction activity associated with this structure will include boulders being Page 13 of 106 brought in by barge and dumped overboard in the relevant locations.
Final placement will be done using an on board crane with a clamshell bucket directed by underwater divers.

At this time the origin of the boulders is not clear.

The final design study will consider the potential of various quarries identified around the island.

Loading a barge with these size boulders could present significant logistical problems regarding transport and loading facilities.
Civil works in the near-shore and marine environments will require specific mitigation measures to prevent significant potential environmental impacts, and will be detailed and developed through a site-specific EIA once designs are sufficiently advanced, as described further in this EMF.

This condition will apply to all coastal defence projects.

(g) Dark View Coastal Defence The consultant has provided the following final design option at this location viz.
(i) (ii) A 620m long boulder revetment on the Eastern side of the site.

The boulders will have a D50 size of 1m placed in two layers at the base of the cliff between mean sea level (msl) and + 6.5m above msl.

The boulders are supported on a gravel filter bed on geotextile fabric.

The boulder slope configuration is 1V to 2H.

A 100m long offshore breakwater situated approximately 25m from the water line.

The D50 size is 1.3m placed in a 1V to 1.5H configuration with a 3m crest width.
The crest of the breakwater will be at elevation +1m.

The boulders are supported on geotextile fabric on the sea bed and will have an approximate crest height of 5m above the sea bed.

The construction activity associated with the offshore breakwater will include boulders being brought in (a) by barge and dumped overboard in the relevant locations or (b) via a temporary access road constructed out from the seashore to the breakwater location.
Final placement will be done using crane with a clamshell bucket directed by underwater divers.

At this time the origin of the boulders is not clear.

Loading a barge with these size boulders could present significant logistical problems regarding transport and loading facilities.

For the construction of the boulder revetment, access along the cliff base will require the development of a temporary access road to allow the trucks to haul in the boulders.
This access road will need to be built to the far end of the revetment and just above sea level with work proceeding from the far end back to the start.

The road material will be removed and used as part of the filter layer between the main boulders and cliff face.

It will also help to form the 1V:2H slope.

As indicated for the Georgetown project, at this time the origin of the boulders is not clear.

The final design study will consider the potential of various quarries identified around the island.
Loading a barge with these size boulders could present significant logistical problems regarding transport and loading facilities even though the project location is on the protected Leeward coastline.

Page 14 of 106 (h) Sans Souci Coastal Defence In anticipation of the reduction of slope angle at Mt.

Greenan that would produce 60,000 – 100,000 cubic yards of material, the coastal defense intervention would provide ideal synergy through landfill to mitigate against coastal erosion.
The works shall include rock armour revetment protection on geotextile fabric on the seaward side of the landfill.

Civil works in the near-shore and marine environments will require specific mitigation measures to prevent significant potential environmental impacts, and will be detailed and developed through a site- specific EIA once designs are sufficiently advanced.

(i) River Defense at North River, South River, Warrowwarrow River.
The designs for these works are currently being finalised by a consultant based on the conceptual designs by a previous consultancy.

The final designs indicate that the nature of the construction activity here will be essentially a combination of gabion basket work, concrete underpinning of existing walls , new reinforced concrete retaining walls and a large box drain lining of the river channel (Warrowwarrow) .

The gabion work activity will be standard.

viz.


excavation three feet below riverbed, followed by the laying of geotextile fabric and baskets in-filled with cobble sized stones.

The baskets will be tied together with tie wire.

Some excavation and /or backfilling will be required on the embankment slopes to form a suitable hydraulic alignment.
In these areas, the civil works in riverbed areas will require specific mitigation measures to prevent significant potential environmental impacts, and will be detailed and developed once designs are sufficiently advanced, as described further in this EMF.

(j) Rehabilitation of Longline Road, Ferguson Mountain Road, Gaskil Road, Fireburn Road, Dandrade Road, Palmiste Road, and Congo Valley Road A preliminary assessment was made of these roads based on reconnaissance in February 2015.
The Longline and Congo Valley roads both traverse areas with well preserved natural habitat and will require EIAs to develop appropriate management plans.

Similar studies for the Fenton – Green Hill Road (RDVRP) were well prepared and can be used as a guide or template, as they covered such aspects as parrot habitat, temporary storage and laydown areas and access, and erosion control, among others.
Chance-find procedures should be rigorously implemented near Palmiste as archeological sites are known in the area (the Layou Petroglyphs).

Finally the environmental effects from quarry sites used for the project should also be included in the environmental assessment and mitigation measures.

(k) Chateaubelair Jetty Page 15 of 106 The existing jetty at Chateaubelair was badly damaged by flooding and must be rehabilitated to provide emergency access to populations on the northwest coast.
The Chateaubelair Islet Wildlife Reserve is a sensitive protected area not too distant from the jetty site, and local fishermen use the area as well.

This has already been done for the other coastal works projects under the RDVRP (Georgetown, Dark View).

Coastal works such as these will require careful planning and detailed mitigation measures, for which an EIA is needed.
Earnest community consultation is also recommended for all coastal works because of the high potential for socioeconomic and environmental impact.

Page 16 of 106 2.0 LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2.1 Regulatory Framework In Saint Vincent and the Grenadines a number of Government and statutory agencies have responsibility for environmental management in one form or another under various pieces of legislation.
Some agencies find themselves operating in grey areas or executing responsibilities that could better be managed under one agency with the relevant legal mandate.

The following matrix provides a general overview of the agencies, laws and regulations pertaining to environmental management and disaster mitigation.
They cover such areas as the environment, land use, water management (including domestic, commercial, and hazardous waste management), historical and cultural patrimony, public health, and disaster response.

The varied environmental management efforts have generally been fragmented and stymied in many cases by a lack of coordinated efforts, absence of empowering legislation or regulations, and financial and technical resources.

Table 1.
Table 1.

Summary of pertinent agencies, the supporting legislations and scope of influence.
Agency Central Water and Sewerage Authority [Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment] Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment [Solid Waste Management Unit] Legislation • Central Water and Sewerage Act (No.6, 1978), amended in 1992 • Central Water and Sewerage Authority Act (No.17, 1991) • Environmental Health Services Act (No.14, 1991) • Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (Draft, 2009) • Environmental Management Act (Draft, 2009) • Waste Management Act (No.31, 2000) Scope Make better provision for the conservation, control, apportionment, and use of water resources of SVG.
Make provision for the conservation and maintenance of the environment in the interest of health generally and in particularly in relation to places frequented by the public The SWMU was established in November, 1999 to execute the activities under the “Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) Solid and Ship-generated Waste Management Project” and is also currently responsible for the collection and disposal of Solid waste on St. Vincent.
In addition, the SWM Unit is responsible for the development of waste management facilities on the Grenadine islands of Bequia, Union Island and Canouan.
Page 17 of 106 Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Transformation Forestry and Fisheries Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Transformation Forestry and Fisheries [Forestry] Ministry of Tourism and Culture Ministry of Housing, Informal Human Settlement, Physical Planning, Lands and Surveys [PPU] The Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment houses the focal point for these conventions.

The Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment.
[The SGD has Page 18 of 106 • Fisheries Act (No.8, 1986), & later amendments (No.32, 1986, and No.25, 1989) • Forest Resource Conservation Act (No.47, 1992 • Marine Parks Authority Act1997(No.33, 2002) • Natural Forest Resource Act (1947) • Wildlife Protection Act (No.16, 1987) & later amendments (1988, 1991) • Wildlife Conservation Act (1991) • National Parks Act (No.33, 2002) • National Parks (Amendment) Act (No.13, 2010) • Town and Country Planning Act (No.45, 1992) United Nations Conventions • UNCBD • UNCCD Promotion and management of fisheries and matters pertaining there to.
To provide for the conservation, management and proper use of the forest and watersheds, declaration of forest reserves, cooperative forest and conservation areas.

The establishment of Marine Parks and other related matters.

Providing for the protection of wildlife and any connected issues.
The conservation and sustainable management of the Nation’s forest, wildlife and national park resources To preserve, manage, protect and develop the natural and cultural heritage of SVG, including the historical and cultural heritage of the Island The Town and Country Planning Act (No.45, 1992) guides planning in St. Vincent & the Grenadines.

Under this act, the PPU has the legal authority for environmental management in general, including the evaluation of the need for and level of EIA requirements.
Convention for the protection of biological diversity.

Convention to combat desertification.

• UNFCCC Convention to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

• Cartagena Convention – LBS protocol • St. Georges Declaration of Principles for Sustainable Development (SGD) in the Organization of the Convent against land based sources of marine pollution.
This sub-regional agreement is designed to support sustainable development and covers a wide range of environmental issues including … the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) reporting requirements for all Ministries of Government] Eastern Caribbean States (OECS) of 2001.
As a signatory to the MEAs and SGD, St. Vincent & the Grenadines has obligations to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, protect and sustainably manage its biological diversity, prevent land degradation and ensure that livelihood issues are not threatened or compromised.
The National Environmental Management Strategy and the National Economic and Social Development Plan 2013-2025 speaks to environmental sustainability; as a consequence, all activities under the RDVRP must respect and respond to these declarations and pronouncements.
2.2 World Bank Safeguard Policies The World Bank projects and activities are governed by Operational Policies (OP), which are designed to ensure that the projects are economically, financially, socially and environmentally sound.1 The Bank has specific safeguard policies, which include Environmental Assessments and policies designed to prevent unintended adverse effects on third parties and the environment.
These specific safeguard policies address natural habitats, pest management, cultural property, involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples, safety of dams, projects on international waterways and projects in disputed areas2.
The World Bank's environmental assessment policy and recommended processing are used to identify, avoid, and mitigate the potential negative environmental impacts associated with Bank lending operations and are described in the Bank’s Operational Policy (OP)/Bank Procedure (BP) 4.01: Environmental Assessment.
This policy is considered to be the umbrella policy for the Bank's environmental 'safeguard policies' which among others include: Natural Habitats (OP 4.04), Forests (OP 4.36), Pest Management (OP 4.09), Physical Cultural Resources (OP 4.11), and Safety of Dams (OP 4.37).

Under OP4.01 the Bank will undertake environmental screening of each proposed project to determine the appropriate extent and type of environmental assessment required.
Proposed projects are classified into one of four categories, depending on the type, location, sensitivity, and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of its potential environmental impacts.
The categories of potential environmental impacts are classified as A, B, C and FI, as described in Table 2 below: 1Source:http://www.worldbank.org/opmanual 2Source:http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTSAFEPOL/0,,contentMDK:20507 440~pagePK:64168427~piPK:64168435~theSitePK:584435,00.html Page 19 of 106 Table 2: World Bank project categories Category Category A Category B Category C Category FI Description Category A project is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented.
These impacts may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject to physical works.

The EA for Category A project examines the project's potential negative and positive environmental impacts, compares them with those of feasible alternatives (including the "without project" scenario), and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimise, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance.
For Category A project, a borrower is responsible for preparing an Environmental Impact Assessment (or a suitably comprehensive regional or sectorial EA).

Category B project has potential adverse environmental impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas, including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural habitats - which are less adverse than those of Category A projects.
These impacts are site specific; few if any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for Category A projects.

Category C project is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts.

Beyond screening, no further EA action is required.

Category F or FI project involves investment of Bank funds through a financial intermediary, in subprojects that may result in adverse environmental impacts.
After review of the project and its components, the overall DVRP project has not been deemed to have any major negative environmental impacts but because of the presence of the civil works with minor to moderate impacts, the project has been classified as a Category B project.

The implementation of appropriate mitigation and management measures will assist in reducing any potential negative impacts from the various project components.
The World Bank Safeguard Policy OP 4.01 for Environmental Assessment (EA) is triggered, and requires that an Environmental Management Framework (EMF) be prepared along with an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to guide recommended measures.
The other World Bank Safeguard Policies dealing with natural habitats, physical cultural resources, pest management, and forests may possibly apply to projects in the future of the DVRP program, so they are described briefly below3: • Operational Policy 4.04 on Natural Habitats seeks to ensure that World Bank-supported infrastructure and other development projects take into account the conservation of biodiversity, as well as the numerous environmental services and products which natural habitats provide to human society.
The policy strictly limits the circumstances under 3Source: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTSAFEPOL/0,,content MDK:20543943~menuPK:1286597~pagePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:584435,00.html Page 20 of 106 which any Bank-supported project can damage natural habitats (land and water areas where most of the native plant and animal species are still present).
• The objective of OP/BP 4.11 on Physical Cultural Resources is to avoid, or mitigate, adverse impacts on cultural resources from development projects that the World Bank finances.

Cultural resources are important as sources of valuable historical and scientific information, as assets for economic and social development, and as integral parts of a people's cultural identity and practices.

The loss of such resources is irreversible, but fortunately, it is often avoidable.
Physical cultural resources are defined as movable or immovable objects, sites, structures, groups of structures, and natural features and landscapes that have archaeological, paleontological, historical, architectural, religious, aesthetic, or other cultural significance.

Physical cultural resources may be located in urban or rural settings, and may be above or below ground, or under water.

Their cultural interest may be at the local, provincial or national level, or within the international community.
The above two policies have been triggered as precautions, so that the appropriate measures to protect natural habitats and physical cultural resources are certain to be included in this EMF.

• Operational Policy 4.09 on Pest Management seeks to ensure that rural development and health sector projects avoid using harmful pesticides.

A preferred solution is to use Integrated Pest Management (IPM) techniques and encourage their use in the whole of the sectors concerned.
The Bank requires that any pesticide it finances be manufactured, packaged, labelled, handled, stored, disposed of, and applied according to standards acceptable to the Bank.
The Bank does not finance formulated products that fall in WHO classes IA and IB, or formulations of products in Class II, if (a) the country lacks restrictions on their distribution and use; or (b) they are likely to be used by, or be accessible to, lay personnel, farmers, or others without training, equipment, and facilities to handle, store, and apply these products properly.
• The Bank's Forests Policy (Operational Policy/Bank Procedure 4.36) aims to reduce deforestation, enhance the environmental contribution of forested areas, promote afforestation, reduce poverty, and encourage economic development.
The objective of this policy is to assist borrowers to harness the potential of forests to reduce poverty in a sustainable manner, integrate forests effectively into sustainable economic development, and protect the vital local and global environmental services and values of forests.

Where forest restoration and plantation development are necessary to meet these objectives, the Bank assists borrowers with forest restoration activities that maintain or enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functionality.
The Bank also assists borrowers with the establishment and sustainable management of environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable forest plantations to help meet growing demands for forest goods and services.
This policy applies to the projects that have or may have impacts on the health and quality of forests, projects that affect the rights and welfare of people and their level of dependence upon or interaction with forests, and projects that Page 21 of 106 aim to bring about changes in the management, protection, or utilization of natural forests.

The above two policies were not triggered.


Careful examination is warranted to ensure that adequate steps are taken for protection of natural habitat, management of forests, conservation of physical cultural resources, and management of pesticides.

Screening of proposed projects will reveal whether the appropriate inquiries must be included in the analysis of environmental impacts and the design of mitigation measures.
This EMF report provides details on those types of possible impacts in the context of this program, as well as guidelines for screening and subsequent actions.

2.3 National Regulatory Framework St. Vincent & the Grenadines has legislation in place to address environmental and social development issues within respective jurisdictions.
The Town and Country Planning Act (No.45, 1992) was initiated to guide planning in St. Vincent & the Grenadines and falls under the jurisdiction of Ministry of Housing, Informal Human Settlement, Physical Planning , Lands and Surveys.

Under the Act, Article 29, an EIA for environmentally sensitive projects or activities is required.
The Physical Planning Unit (PPU) has the legal authority for environmental management in general under this Act, including the evaluation of, the need for and level of EIA required.

In St. Vincent & the Grenadines there is no grading system for projects requiring EIA but the scope of the EIA is determined through discussion with the PPU.
Within this piece of legislation lies the authority of the Planning Department to “… make provision for the orderly development of land, the assessment of the environmental impacts of development, the grant of permission to develop land and for other powers to regulate the use of land, and for related matters.” The PPU functions as the technical/advisory arm of the Physical Planning and Development Board (PPDP), the body that oversees national development.
The Act gives the Minister the ultimate and final decision on any planning matter.

The Chair, Deputy Chair and Committee member of the PPDB are civil society member with the Town Planner as Secretary.
Other members of the PPDB include representatives from the Police, National Properties, Transport and Works (Chief Engineer), Housing and Land Development Corporation, CWSA, VINLEC, Lands and Surveys, Kingstown Town board, the Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Housing.
The Physical Planning and Development Board (PPDB) has the legal authority for carrying out the purpose and provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act.

The PPU is responsible for ensuring Project development occurs within the environmental and social requirements of St. Vincent & the Grenadines.
As part of its regular responsibilities, the Page 22 of 106 PPU will review the EIA and development applications as well as oversee all other development control related matters, from inspection, to monitoring and enforcement.
2.4 Environmental Management Capacities The various management agencies operate under legislation that attempts to guide them but the issues of overlapping and sometimes unclear responsibilities continue to plague effective operations and responses to a number of environmental management issues.

Coastal development is a case in point.

The Fisheries Authority, the Forestry Department and the Physical Planning Department all have some jurisdiction over coastal resources.
These forms of overlap along with lack of adequately trained staff, technical and financial resources coupled with absence of concerted, coordinated, cooperative efforts by the various agencies have contributed to limitations in environmental management.

Such limitations coupled with agencies heavy workloads and deadlines make it difficult if not impossible for them to single-handedly contribute to monitoring and ensuring environmental safeguards as prescribed.
In such a circumstance it appears that utilizing a joint and focused approach in the form of a small multidisciplinary team may be the better approach to managing and monitoring projects to ensure basic environmental safeguards are incorporated and maintained.

Here it is worth noting that there is a dormant cabinet appointed multidisciplinary team called the Environmental Advisory Board that has a mandate to ensure environmental safeguards for SVG.
Page 23 of 106 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENV DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 3.1 St. Vincent and the Grenadines St. Vincent and the Grenadines General Context Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is an archipelagic state in the Eastern Caribbean (Figure 1).

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is an archipelagic state in the Eastern Caribbean (Figure 1).

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is an archipelagic state in the Eastern Caribbean (Figure 1).
The country comprises a main island, St. Vincent, and a chain of 32 islands and cays, the The country comprises a main island, St. Vincent, and a chain of 32 islands and cays, the The country comprises a main island, St. Vincent, and a chain of 32 islands and cays, the Grenadines.

The island is approximately 389 km2 [150 square miles] in area with approximately [150 square miles] in area with approximately Grenadines.
The island is approximately 389 km The island consists of a central axial range of 108,570 inhabitants (preliminary data 2012).

The island consists of a central axial range of 108,570 inhabitants (preliminary data 2012).

mountains starting from La Soufriere (1,179m) South.

From the mountain tops the land rushes to the sea with only a narrow coastal belt and South.

From the mountain tops the land rushes to the sea with only a narrow coastal belt and South.
From the mountain tops the land rushes to the sea with only a narrow coastal belt and is covered in large part by tropical undulating mountainous terrain is covered in large part by tropical limited flat land area.

This undulating mountainous terrain forest.

St. Andrew (736m) to the rting from La Soufriere (1,179m) in the North, to Mount St. Andrew (736m) to the Figure 1.

Location Map of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Figure 1.
Location Map of Saint Page 24 of 106 3.2 Geology St. Vincent and the Grenadines is part of the wider Antillean Arc of islands that are geologically young, not more than 50 million years old and predominantly volcanic in origin.

While the active tectonic processes may not appear evident every day, the region is still active as evidenced by earthquakes and eruptions at La Soufriere in 1812, 1902 and 1979.
La Soufriere is considered to be an active volcano and its crater and dome form the northern quarter of St. Vincent, giving rise to its topography and modifying its climate.

Volcanic ash also enriches the soils of St. Vincent making for immensely fertile conditions.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is almost entirely volcanic with the oldest rocks, largely of andesite and various basalts, forming as long as 3 million years ago with the youngest rocks being erupted as recently as 1979.
The most recent volcanic centres and the Pre-Soufriere volcanic centres (Fig.2) all appear to have evolved in a similar manner.

Early eruptive activities were effusive (non-explosive) and produced a substructure of basaltic lava flows.
These activities then alternated with periods of explosive eruptions which produced large strato-cones by depositing layer upon layer of ash and scoria, followed by voluminous nuee-ardente (“glowing cloud or pyroclastic deposits such as ash-flow tuff layers), and finally culminating with collapse features with the emplacement of summit domes and plugs (Robertson, 2003).
The focus of volcanic activity and the creation of eruptive centres has migrated northward over the last 3 million years, currently culminating in the active volcano of Soufriere on the north end of the island of St. Vincent.

This range of volcanic mountains divides the island almost equally between a gently sloping eastern or windward side and a deeply dissected and rugged western or leeward side.
Volcanic materials that make up the island have been severely affected by erosion and are deeply weathered due to the tropical climate, the steep topography, and the unconsolidated nature of the materials.

The geological history of the island consists of the development and northward migration of a series of volcanic centres (Robertson, 2003).

The southeast volcanic are the oldest rocks exposed on the island and are about 2.75 million years old.
Apart from recent alluvial deposits such as river and beach sands, and a few outcrops of sedimentary and marine deposits such as limestone and coral, only igneous rocks are found on the island.

Page 25 of 106 Fig.2 Geologic Map of St. Vincent 3.3 Topography and Drainage Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is mountainous (Fig.

3) with a south central mountain range rising to La Soufriere at 4,048 feet above sea level.
Many pronounced gulleys and valleys descend to the coast on both the western and eastern side of the central ridge.

Many of the narrow valleys are filled with perennial streams and rivers that water the small alluvial plains before enter then the Caribbean Sea.

The eastern side of the island contains most of the flat and arable lands.
Page 26 of 106 Figure 3: Map of St. Vincent showing topography : Map of St. Vincent showing topography Four major watersheds are currently used as the main water resources for the supply of the watersheds are currently used as the main water resources for the supply of the watersheds are currently used as the main water resources for the supply of the population of St. Vincent: Richland, Cumberland, Colonaire, and Montreal (Fig.

4).
4).

The source population of St. Vincent: Richland, Cumberland, Colonaire, and Montreal (Fig.

4).

population of St. Vincent: Richland, Cumberland, Colonaire, and Montreal (Fig.

4).

elevation mountainous terrains.

Surface diversion of the water of the water is rainfall in the high-elevation mountainous terrains.
Surface diversion of the water of the water is rainfall in the high made to produce hydroelectric energy as well as for public water from streams and rivers is made to produce hydroelectric energy as well as for public water made to produce hydroelectric energy as well as for public water supply.
3.4 Current Climate Precipitation: The location and size of St. Vincent make it highly susceptible to climatic cation and size of St. Vincent make it highly susceptible to climatic cation and size of St. Vincent make it highly susceptible to climatic influences.

On average, St. Vincent receives 219 cm of rainfall per year, making it one of the influences.

On average, St. Vincent receives 219 cm of rainfall per year, making it one of the influences.
On average, St. Vincent receives 219 cm of rainfall per year, making it one of the wetter islands of the Eastern Caribbean.

Figure 4 shows an almost unimodal pattern in the wetter islands of the Eastern Caribbean.

Figure 4 shows an almost unimodal pattern in the wetter islands of the Eastern Caribbean.
Figure 4 shows an almost unimodal pattern in the November and the dry season sland’s rainfall climatology, with the wet season occurring June-November and the dry season island’s rainfall climatology, with the wet season occurring June Page 27 of 106 between January and May.

The rainy season, during which the island receives ~70% of total annual rainfall, coincides with the period of highest tropical storm activity in the region.

Figure 4: Major watersheds used for waters supply of St. Vincent.
(Source: ECLAC, 2011) Page 28 of 106 Figure 5.

Mean annual monthly rainfall for Saint Vincent (ET Joshua Airport 1987 -2008).

Units are mm/month.

There is also considerable inter-annual variability in the rainfall record.
1997 was among the driest years on recent record (~160 cm), but was followed by one of the wettest years, 1998, (~295 cm).There is evidence that some of the variability is driven by global climatic fluctuations such as the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) or by large scale gradients in tropical Atlantic and Pacific sea surface temperatures.

Temperature: Mean temperatures vary by 2 0C throughout the year and peak between May and October.
Maximum temperatures can reach a high of 31oC during these months, and minimum temperatures a low of around 23oC in February.

Highest temperatures on record were seen in 1998, which is consistent with global estimates.

Both the maximum and minimum temperature records show a warming trend over the past 22 years.

(The trend is however not statistically significant at the 95% level).

The warming is consistent with the rest of the Caribbean (Peterson et al.

2002) and the globe (Alexander et al.

2006).


Also, like the global averages, maximum temperatures for St. Vincent are increasing at a slightly faster rate (0.2oC/decade) than minimum temperatures (0.15oC/decade).

Other Climate Elements: Relative humidity across the country tends to be generally high year round (above 70%) and predictably highest during the main rainfall period.
Winds are generally E to ESE, and wind speed is strongest (>9 metres per second) through the dry period to the beginning of the rainy period (December-June).

During this period the north Atlantic high is a persistent and dominant influence on the region.

Notwithstanding, strong wind gusts are also common from June to November during the passage of tropical waves, depressions, storms or hurricanes.

St. Vincent is on the hurricane track of the eastern Caribbean (Figure 5).

Page 29 of 106 Figure 6.


Hurricane tracks in the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico 3.5 Socio-economy and Human Settlement The 2001 population and housing census indicated that SVG has a population of 106,253 persons.

Approximately 90% of the population is of African descent, while the other 10% is a combination of East Indian, European and indigenous people.

St. Vincent and the Grenadines is internationally classified as a lower-middle-income country.
The economic development is structured around the agriculture, tourism and international business services sectors.

The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita (2008) is US$5,515; the literacy rate is 96% and the life expectancy at birth is 74 years.

In 2009, the overall Human Development Index (HDI) Value is 0.772 and the country is ranked 91st in terms of HDI.

Historical settlement patterns have followed along flat coastal areas near major rivers or fishing banks.
The population of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is concentrated in the south of the island, particularly in Kingstown and Calliaqua and their suburbs (Fig.

7).

As the population has increased, the settlement pattern has slowly crept up from the low lying urban areas into the surrounding hillsides creating expanding suburban settlements.

Page 30 of 106 Figure 7.


Population Distributions in St. Vincent There are some unplanned settlements consisting mainly of lower income households generally reside on vulnerable slopes.

Inadequate drainage and unplanned sewage systems and services make these areas vulnerable to landslides during rainstorms.
These settlements in St. Vincent are typically situated on marginal, less favourable lands for economic development that also tend to be more prone to environmental degradation (such as land slippage) under intensive utilization.

Compounding the situation is the fact that these settlements are often devoid of basic sanitation services such as running water and proper sewage disposal facilities, which predisposes the residents to water borne diseases such as diarrhea which affect especially children.
Given the nature of tenure and lack of resources, residents have little or no vested interest in managing the lands and lack the capacity to make any investments that may address sustainable land management.

Extensive forests cover the central mountain ranges (Figure 8).

The eastern side of the island has most of the relatively flat-lying land and consequently has seen the most commercial agriculture (Figure 8).
St. Vincent and the Grenadines was among the world’s top producers of arrowroot flour, however the crop is now of minor importance, dwarfed by banana and other agricultural production.

Other crop commodities of significance in SVG include dasheen, eddoes, sweet potatoes and yams.

Major tree crops include mango, coconut, avocado and citrus.

The livestock industry is relatively small.


According to the 2000 Agriculture Census, production (in terms of number of heads) was dominated by sheep, goats and poultry.

Page 31 of 106 Figure 8.

Land Use in St. Vincent as of 1996.

In recent decades the economy is increasingly dominated by tourism.

In 2004 the number of stop over tourists reached 86,700 with tourism receipts totaling US$95.6 million.
Due to the contraction of the agricultural sector, the tourism sector is now making a greater contribution to national development with direct investment and ancillary development in support service sectors.

This trend is anticipated to increase as national development policy seeks to place the hospitality sector within the main engines of economic growth.
Tourism in SVG has been focused primarily on the “sea and sand” experience especially with respect to the extensive array of water-based activities available on the Grenadine islands.

The rise in eco-tourism in SVG is noteworthy in the context of land conservation.

Sustainable management of land-based resources is of critical importance not only guaranteeing quality of eco-touristic excursion experience but also quality of marine ecosystems that have dive site potential in that sector.
The new Argyle International Airport will be the island’s first international airport and will feature a 50,000 square-foot terminal.

It will effectively open up the island to non-stop international flights.

Page 32 of 106 The industrial sector in SVG employs around 8% of the workforce and in 2008 contributed about 29.2% to GDP.

Industrial activity is focused primarily on agricultural processing of foodstuffs such as flour, rice, animal feeds, beans and other dried grain.
3.6 Biological Resources The natural vegetation of SVG exists in several stages of development and/or disturbance caused by human and natural (volcanic) interventions.

It is therefore defined by a climax vegetation formation based on environmental gradients.

The concentric variations of rainfall with elevation give rise to concentric variations in vegetation.
The slopes of the La Soufriere volcano have been subject to the frequent disturbance of vegetation by volcanic eruptions, however it shows both the success of re-vegetation along with the variation of vegetation with elevation.

This concentric variation in vegetation is modified by factors of topography and geology in the Grenadines, which have lower relief, and a more semi-arid climate than the mainland.
The soils of the Grenadines are shallow with a uniform vegetation distribution of scrub and cacti vegetation.

The physical and environmental conditions of rainfall, soils, elevation, terrain, and exposure to the trade winds, results in a remarkable diversity of eco-systems and forest types, including: • Elfin Woodland: Found on exposed summits above 500 metres on both sides of the central mountains.

They consist of pure stands of dwarfed trees about three metres in height covered with epiphytes.
This vegetation type is commonly associated with the Palm Brake vegetation type.

• Rain Forest: Confined to areas in the upper Colonaire, Cumberland and Buccament Valleys between 300 and 488 metres.

• Palm Brake: This refers to a sub-climax type typically at elevations over 500 metres arising after disturbances such as landslides or tree-falls (opening up the forest canopy).
The land is covered initially by mosses, then by small tree ferns and heliconias followed by the characteristic Mountain Cabbage Palms.

• Secondary Rain Forest: This type describes the resultant forests arising from disturbances from volcanic eruptions, hurricanes and human activity.

The largest areas lie around the Soufriere Mountains.

The vegetation ranges from almost bare soil on the upper slopes of the Soufriere volcano to significant stands of new forest at lower elevations.
• Deciduous Seasonal Forests/Cactus Scrub: On the dry southern and southwestern coasts of St. Vincent and the Grenadines where the soils are extremely thin, deciduous to semi- deciduous and xerophytic species predominate.

• Littoral Woodland: This type of vegetation is characterized by manchineel, button mangrove, sea grape and similar species.

They exist as small narrow strips along the eastern coastline on St. Vincent and on a number of the islets and cays of the Grenadines.
This type of vegetation is fast disappearing as development takes place along the coast.

• Swamp: Only small areas of swamp occur in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

These exist in the southern section of the main land on the coast and on a few of the Grenadine islets.

The typical species found in these areas are Red Mangrove, Black Mangrove, White Mangrove and Button Mangrove.

Page 33 of 106 St. Vincent and the Grenadines is host to many highly biodiverse ecosystems.
More than 1,150 species of flowering plants, 163 species of ferns, 4 species of amphibians, 16 species of reptiles, 111 species of birds, and 15 species of mammals which have been identified.

In terms of marine biodiversity, over 500 species have been identified.

Among these are at least 450 species of fin- fish, 12 species of whales and dolphins, 4 species of turtles, 9 of gastropods, 11 seaweeds and 30 different coral species.
Fifteen Important Bird Areas (IBAs) have been recognized in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (Figure 9a).

Forests are key to biodiversity in St. Vincent, in some cases exhibiting more than 100 species of trees per hectare.

A national forest inventory conducted in 1993 described 38% of St. Vincent land area covered by forest, about 5% of which was mature, mostly undisturbed primary forest (4,308 hectares).
Forests in St. Vincent covered an estimated 14,038 hectares in 1949 and an estimated 12,690 hectares in 1993 (Knights and Joselyn, 2008).

Deforestation was estimated to average 17 hectares per year and approach 30 hectares per year in some watershed areas.

Clandestine cultivation of ganja occurs in the roughest terrain on the slopes of La Soufriere and other mountainous areas, and is an emerging major cause of deforestation and land degradation.
In 1993, land higher in elevation than 305 meters above sea level was designated as forest reserves for the purpose of conserving the remaining resources.

There are 4 designated forest reserves, as shown in Figure 9b, which occur in the high-lying mountainous regions of St. Vincent (Soufriere, Colonaire, Mesopotamia, Cumberland) and another at Tobago Cays where a marine preserve is also located.

St.Vincent and the Grenadines also has designated 26 wildlife reserves and 5 recreation areas.
In all 11% of the land area (36 km2) is under some type of designated protective status (Figure 9b).

Page 34 of 106 Figure 9a,b.

Important Bird Areas (left) and Protected Areas (right) in St. Vincent.

(Sources: Culzac-Wilson (2009), Byrne (2006).

3.7 Geo-hazards Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is vulnerable to a number of natural hazards such as hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic activity, drought, tsunamis, flooding, and landslides.
The effects of these phenomena can be exacerbated by the activities of population such as deforestation, indiscriminate garbage disposal, poor building practices, and unplanned settlements in environmentally sensitive areas.

With the increased frequency of intense weather events resulting from climate change, the possibility for disasters occurring increases placing increased strain on the limited national technical and financial resources and the country’s ability to respond.
Hurricane Tomas was a clear example of this.

The island has also experienced two period of drought, in 2002, and again between 2009 and 2010, placing tremendous strain on the limited national water supply.

In response to these drought events, the CWSA has intensified its search for underground water resources.

A number of boreholes have been dug in St. Vincent and in the Grenadines.
Page 35 of 106 As an example of the vulnerability of St. Vincent and the Grenadines to natural disasters, Hurricane Tomas which impacted St. Vincent and the Grenadines in October 2010 was a major disaster affecting areas around the country resulting in landslides, infrastructural damage and loss of property.

Several the major landslides and debris flows occurred along major roadways and settlements on the north-eastern side of the island.
Some landslides occurred in forested areas affecting critical water supply infrastructure.

In December 2013 more than 400 mm (16 inches) of rain fell on St. Vincent causing at least 8 fatalities and displacing hundreds.

The volcanic hazard of St. Vincent has been studied by many researchers.

Zones near the active La Soufriere volcano in the north part of the island have the highest risk level of a new eruption (Fig.

9).
9).

Loose deposits of volcanic ash from the volcano are also the root cause of many of the devastating landslides which affect the island.

As noted by Robertson 2003: “Geology has had an impact on the development of St Vincent and the Grenadines.

The impact of three eruptions of the Soufrière volcano within the past century has been significant and future eruptions are expected.

The limitations placed on development of the island's resources are unquestionable.
At the same time the volcanic mountains are responsible for the lush vegetation, the abundant rainfall and the rugged beauty that characterises the island.

It is time for the available geological information to be used in a pro-active rather than a reactive manner.

There is much that can be done with proper planning and meaningful application of the information and expertise that is available.
We should not be surprised when the loose ash that drapes the island slides during periods of excessive rainfall.

Rather we should be able to identify the areas and times that this is most likely to occur and take remedial action to prevent this movement from being realised.

We should not wait for the next volcanic eruption before plans are implemented to cater for this eventuality (and this does not only apply to volcano monitoring installations).
We should not place investment in schemes that are unlikely to last due to limitations placed on them by geologic processes such as mass movement and volcanic hazards.

We can use the information we have to build environmentally friendly structures and sustainable systems that will not be destroyed by the processes that have formed the island and that will continue to impact on its evolution.” Page 36 of 106 Figure 10.

Volcanic hazard zones in St. Vincent.


(Source: Robertson, 2005) The University of West Indies (UWI, 2011) has produced updated maps showing seismic hazard (earth shaking) that can be used for planning purposes in the Eastern Caribbean.

These seismic hazards result from tectonic activity (the subduction of the Atlantic Plate beneath the Caribbean Plate).
In St. Vincent the peak ground acceleration (expressed as a percentage (%) of g, the acceleration of gravity), is up to 15%g every 100 years, 25%g every 500 years, and 40%g every 1,000 years.

Costal zones are also vulnerable to storm surge during hurricanes, and erosion from wave energy.

Storm surge from hurricanes is pronounced on the southwest coast, where up to 5 meters of sea level rise during hurricanes could occur (Fig.

10).

Elsewhere, up to 2 meters would be expected during hurricanes.
The eastern side of St. Vincent is exposed to long-fetch waves across thousands of miles of open Atlantic Ocean, and consequently has a number of erosion hot spots (Fig.

10) vulnerable to wave energy.


Tsunamis also pose a hazard in the Eastern Caribbean and can be caused by earthquakes, by avalanches off the side of La Soufriere or other volcanoes (Le Friant and others, 2009), and by eruptions of volcanoes particularly those lying on the seafloor such as Kick-em Jenny near Grenada, which could result in a 2-meter tsunami arriving at St. Vincent within 15 minutes of eruption (Gibbs, 2001).

Page 37 of 106 Figure 11.

Storm Surge and Coastal Erosion hazards in St. Vincent.
(Source: ECLAC, 2011) 3.8 Physical Cultural Resources The rich culture and history of St. Vincent has created physical cultural resources, which are features or objects of interest and value to nation’s people because of their archaeological, paleontological, historical, architectural, religious, aesthetic, or other cultural significance.
These may include artefacts, objects, sites, structures, groups of structures, and natural features and landscapes, and may be located in urban or rural settings, above or below ground, or under water.

Cultural resources are important as sources of valuable historical and scientific information, as assets for economic and social development, and as integral parts of a people's cultural identity and practices.
Recognition of physical cultural resources may be at the local, national level, or within the international community.
Examples may include St. Vincent’s natural treasures such the Botanic Gardens, the petroglyphs in Mesopotamia, Layou, and Barrouallie, the Catholic Church in Kingatown and the old cemetery at Dorsetshire Hill; as marine preserves like the Tobago Cays or Page 38 of 106 forest trails, excellent masonry works, historical buildings, or other features of community importance or international renown.
Page 39 of 106 4.0 PROJECTED IMPACTS 4.1 Analysis of Projected Impacts The following impacts relate to the civil works proposed on the respective sites under consideration.

The proposed civil works activities with any potential impacts are generally small to midsized civil works.
While none of the projects are being implemented in historic or cultural sites, or within designated forest reserves, care must be taken to screen each possible project location and ensure that these resources are carefully protected.
Five subproject activities involve river crossing (Bridges & River crossing at South River, Dauphine, Fenton, Green Hill and river defence for the Warrowwarrow river in the Arnos Vale area), where care must therefore be taken during the reconstruction activities to avoid sedimentation and or pollution of the rivers and ultimately the coastal seas.

Areas for work in coastal zones may involve possible effects to marine and coastal habitat.
Clearing of vegetation and removal of forest cover is generally required for new road segments or at the approach to bridges and fords, so therefore careful analysis must be made to ensure that sensitive habitat, well-preserved forest, or other resources are not affected.

Pertinent environmental management measures in accordance with the screening measures and mitigation plans described later in this EMF must be implemented.
There are both positive and negative impacts attendant to the project and its components.

An initial list of projects was provided by the PSIPMU for which an impact matrix was prepared as below.

The capacity building or institutional strengthening projects could be considered environmentally benign with no adverse impacts.

The Table below provides a list and summary of impacts.
Although the implementing agency is listed as Ministries of Works and Physical Planning, it is expected that some works would be undertaken by private companies but that the Ministries will remain involved at all times giving oversight and performing Monitoring and Evaluation.

Table 3a.

Impact Matrix: List of RDVRP Projects Currently Approved Possibility of Environmental Impact?

Yes Proposed Activities Agency Ministry of Works; Physical Planning.
Satellite Warehouses at Sandy Bay, Rose Hall, Bequia, Mesopotamia, Union Island, Georgetown Level of Environmental Impacts Minimal disruption to the environment if standard EMP and planning guidelines are followed Environmental Impact Aspect, positive(+) or negative(-) 1.

Potential poor construction and management practices leading to poor end products (- ) 2.

Air pollution from dust and Page 40 of 106 vehicular / machinery fumes 3.

Poor Solid waste management from works (-).

4.


Potential resident and worker safety issues (-).

Ministry of Works; Physical Planning Yes 1.

Improved safety of occupants(+) Yes Ministry of Works; Physical Planning 1.

Potential waste management issues (-).

2.

Increased siltation of waterways from works (-).

3.

Potential safety issues for workers (-).

4.

Potential disturbance of natural vegetation (-).


Impact on fauna through noise and presence of human Level of impact will be minimal needing only proper disposal of waste and safety measures for humans.

Moderate but has potential to be significant if not properly scoped and works not properly implemented and managed; may require additional assessment and re-design of bridges in light of floods experienced over the last two years.
Retrofitting of Emergency Shelters at Dorsetshire and Kingstown Government Schools and Union Island Learning Resource Center Bridges & River crossing at South River, North River, Dauphine, Fenton, Green Hill Page 41 of 106 Yes Ministry of Works; Physical Planning Slope Stabilization – Petit Bordel, Dark View, Ginger Village, Troumaca, Maroon Hill, Spring, Mt.

Greenan, Belle Isle, Coull’s Hill and Belle Isle.


Yes Ministry of Works; Physical Planning River Defence on Warrowwarrow River in the Arnos Vale area, South River, North River, Buccament Page 42 of 106 Moderate, if managed with good practices and supervision from implementation to completion.

activity (-).

1.

Potential issues from land disturbance through improper implementation methods/ practices (-).

2.

Poor solid waste (soil) management issues (-).

3.


Increased siltation of waterways from works (-).

4.

Potential worker safety issues especially on steep or unstable slopes (-).

5.

Potential traffic disruption (-).

1.

Increased siltation of waterways from works (-).

2.

Potential worker safety issues (-).

3.

Social issues of land ownership (-).

4.

Impact on Great Head Fisheries conservation area (Warrowwarrow River only) (-) Moderate to significant.
if managed with good practices and supervision from implementation to completion; in some areas could be potentially significant if improperly managed within Forest Reserve or involving highly erodible soils.

Paget Farm Coastal Defence Studies Ministry of Works; Physical Planning No This is primarily a study - social and physical assessment of the area - therefore no impact is expected to result.

Coastal Defence: Georgetown, Sans Souci, Dark View Ministry of Works; Physical Planning Yes 1.
Potential negative impact from vehicular traffic through the community (-).

2.

Potential disruption to coastal wave pattern and wave energy (-).

Moderate level impact associated mainly with transport of material and the potential for alteration and pollution of coastal and marine habitat.

Table 3b.Impact Matrix: Projects Proposed for Additional Financing.

Proposed Activities Agency Possibility of Environmental Impact?
Yes Road and bridge rehabilitation works at Long Line, Congo Valley, Palmiste, Firebun, Ferguson Mountain, Gaskill Ministry of Works; Physical Planning Level of Environmental Impacts Moderate but can be managed with good practices, experienced crew, and proper supervision from implementation to completion.

Environment al Impact Aspect, positive(+) or negative(-) 1.

Potential traffic and other social disruption (-) 2.

Air pollution from earth works on high elevation fumes Page 43 of 106 from equipment.
(-) 3.

Issues of workers safety suspended on slopes (-) 4.

Increased siltation of waterways from works (-).

5.

Potential worker safety issues (-).

6.

Social issues of land ownership (-).

7.

Impact on fauna through noise and presence of human activity (-).

1.

Potential negative impact from vehicular traffic through the community (-).

2.

Potential disruption to coastal wave pattern and wave energy (-).
Moderate level impact associated mainly with transport of material and the potential for alteration and pollution of coastal and marine habitat.
Rehabilitation of Chateaubelair Jetty Yes Ministry of Works; Physical Planning The level or significance of impact indicated above is based on the level of detail of the information provided on the activities of the project components, the intensity of the proposed development, its size, as well as an assessment of the existing environment within which the project is to be implemented.
It should be noted that while the levels of significance of potential impacts have been estimated based on currently available information, there is always the Page 44 of 106 possibility that during implementations, flawed methodologies or poor practices may be utilized or mis-management occur that may increase the significance of the impact in a negative way.

For this reason, consistent monitoring and evaluation of all elements of the work is critical.
It can be seen from Tables 3a and 3b above that most of the proposed civil works or activities with any potential impacts are generally small to midsized civil works.

It is expected that most of the negative impacts associated with the sub-projects are likely to occur during the construction phases.

The proposed projects in Tables 3a and 3b are mainly civil works projects.
By reason of the location of the proposed projects, in adjacent proximity to the marine and river environment, there is the possibility that the civil works to be undertaken can have a negative impact on the coastal marine environment if not managed properly; contamination of coastal waters may result in contravention of the LBS protocol of the Cartagena convention.
Such impacts can occur from spillage of construction materials or chemicals such as cement or oils, from suspended sediments in the water, or from altering the shoreline or coastline configuration such that tidal or water currents are changed to create new areas of erosion or new areas where sediments may be deposited.

In the case of the River Defense Works, hydraulic studies have been conducted to ensure that the proposed works supports flood mitigation efforts.
Final site clean-up after completion of project must be undertaken.

This is very important to reducing the environmental impact of the civil works and should be included in the EMP and contract language as a standard mitigation measure.

4.1.1 Positive Impacts There are several potential positive impacts of the project and associated works.

These will only be highlighted here, as the focus is on negative impacts, and mitigation measures.
The most obvious positive impact is the reduction of the nation’s vulnerability to disasters ensuring safety of property and life.

Other positive benefits include the creation of employment and income generation during the construction phase and finally in the operational phase, although for a less number of persons.
With each sub-project there may be specific positive impacts that can be summarized as follows: • Improving the access to population center, social amenities and farm lands by the upgrading and provision of access roads.

• The creation of temporary employment opportunities and long-term income generation evolving from construction projects, rehabilitation of the community centers and the construction of road and river stabilization works.

• The provision of improved emergency shelters and warehouses.
• Improved learning environments and access to education as in the case of the new schools Page 45 of 106 Efforts to maximize the positive benefits of the works should be sought during design and implementation.

4.1.2 Negative Impacts There is the possibility of the occurrence of the following negative impacts associated with the projects.
• Increased traffic and potential for traffic conflict • Increased Vibration and Noise levels • Poor Solid and Liquid Waste Management • Deforestation and Removal of Natural Habitat • Air pollution • Marine pollution and impacts on marine habitats • Terrestrial pollution • Soil erosion and land slippage • Occupational Health and safety issues • Loss of or Damage to Physical Cultural Resources Each of the impacts is described in more detail below.
Measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the negative effects, are described later in this report.

4.1.2.1 Increased Traffic and Potential for Traffic Conflict There is always the possibility of increased construction-related traffic for civil works of certain sizes especially when the works are occurring adjacent to a main highway.
The potential for vehicular/vehicular and pedestrian/vehicular conflict increases as the scale of construction increases if proper traffic management procedures are not implemented.

This can lead to very tempered negative response from the nearby residents or the community affected.
The matter of safety also becomes a great concern in relation to the speed of the vehicles as well as the alertness of the drivers as they traverse the highways and through communities especially if there are children within the vicinity who may be accustomed to playing on the roads or sidewalk areas.
The breakdown of a large project vehicle causing the blockage of a well travelled route can escalate tensions within a community especially if it contributes to loss of travel time to work, school, or returning home.
4.1.2.2 Increased Noise levels Increased noise and vibration levels resulting from construction activities such as the movement of heavy supply trucks into and out of the site, the use of various forms of heavy equipment such as demolition equipment, can have negative impacts on both the terrestrial and marine environments especially along the coast as well as in the forested areas.

In secluded or forested areas, fauna habitats can be disturbed causing such creatures to flee their homes and nesting areas.
Similarly, increased noise levels from activities adjacent to or within communities and Page 46 of 106 residential areas, can be deemed as an unnecessary and unwanted nuisance affecting local business and day to day activities.

Care must be taken in the judicious usage of any form of heavy noise and vibration equipment.
Associated vibrations from the use of heavy equipment such as rollers can negatively impact surrounding communities, causing nuisances by shaking household items and possibly affecting the stability of nearby structures.

4.1.2.3 Poor Solid and Liquid Waste Management The improper management and disposal of both solid and liquid wastes can be detrimental to both the terrestrial and to the nearby marine environment.
The mishandling of construction wastes such as chemicals, detergents, greases, oils, building materials, can lead to the poisoning of the terrestrial environment.

The entry into the marine environment of any waste or chemical, either through runoff, in drains, or are blown by the wind can also poison the marine environment or damage the fragile marine ecosystem.

The management of human wastes on site is very critical to ensuring a healthy working environment and reduce the risk of faecal contamination.
The management of food wastes is also critical to reducing the incidence of vector entry into an area causing infestation.

Managing excavated soil is also important especially when this soil is being transported to another site for use or storage.

Care must be taken to ensure the appropriateness of the transport and the protocols for transporting and storing the soil.
4.1.2.4 Deforestation and Removal of Natural Habitat The practice of land clearing and especially mass and sometimes indiscriminate land clearing, excavation practices, as well as poor site drainage can lead to land slippage and eventually siltation leading to the loss of life, coastal marine pollution and destruction.

This is especially so on steep slopes.


In forested areas, such deforestation to accommodate the creation of new road segments can lead to loss of habitat for forest and endemic flora and fauna as well as a loss of biodiversity.

Particular care must be exercised in these cases.

4.1.2.5 Air Pollution Air pollution can come from a number of sources.

The vehicles and machinery being utilized can both produces noxious fumes such as carbon monoxide, diesel fumes, as well as burnt oil fumes.
There is the increased potential for air pollution to come from older or improperly service vehicles and machinery as well.

Dust also arises from cleared land that has been exposed to the sun, is dried, and the wind carries this material to nearby residences or communities.

Similarly, uncovered fines such as sands or even cement can be light enough to be blown by the wind.

This is a nuisance to nearby facilities or communities.
The mishandling of particularly noxious chemicals such as solvents or chemical washes, greases, as well as the burning of solid wastes on the construction site, especially chemical containers, can lead to air pollution resulting in negative health impacts.

Page 47 of 106 4.1.2.6 Terrestrial and Marine Pollution The potential for terrestrial and marine pollution can occur with indiscriminate disposal of both solid and liquid wastes.
The mishandling of chemicals and especially waste oils during construction activities can poison the landscape.

During rainfall events chemicals can mix with or be carried by runoff and create liquid wastes that impact both terrestrial and marine environments.

Improper disposal of human wastes can lead to similar effects.

This also applies to pesticides used in termite treatment of construction sites.
With the occurrence of civil works projects along or adjacent, or within the coastal waters such as the River Defence on Warrowwarrow River in the Arnos Vale area, the river defense at Buccament and the coastal defence at Sans Souci, there is the possibility of impact on the marine ecosystem which must be evaluated as project details become more clear.
4.1.2.7 Soil Erosion and Land Slippage The practice of land clearing and especially mass and sometimes indiscriminate land clearing, excavation practices, as well as poor site drainage can lead to exposed soil.

This, the nature of the exposed soil, in combination with the precipitation and/or poor drainage, can lead to land slippage especially on steep slopes.

This can result in loss of life and property.


Eventually this material can wash down into rivers and then to the sea causing siltation and sedimentation.

The resulting effect within the coastal marine environment can be pollution leading to ecosystem death and loss of livelihoods.
In St. Vincent there is a special vulnerability with regards to landslides, and other mass earth movements, due to the loose unconsolidated geologic materials which form the island, the heavy rains to which they are exposed, and the steep slopes upon which they lay.

Opening of roadways, trenching for installation of water lines, grading or clearing for agriculture or housing developments, may all destabilize the soil surface and eventually be the cause for landslides at a later time.
Accordingly, careful planning is required to ensure that soil erosion is minimized and that landslide potential is not exacerbated.

Appendix 6 of this EMF provides a discussion of Best Management Practices (BMPs) for slope stabilization which may serve as a valuable reference to develop mitigation measures.

4.1.2.8 Occupational Health and Safety Issues The International Labour Organization (ILO) defines decent wok as safe and having appropriate compensation.
Worker safety is critical to any operation, therefore, mishandling of equipment, the improper storage and usage of various chemicals and construction materials on site, poor and unsafe working conditions, high levels of continuous noise and fumes, as well as inadequate safety equipment can cause serious injury and down time to the workers and project and should therefore be avoided.

Best management practices should always be implemented as labour laws hold the employer responsible for the workers safety.
Proper facilities will need to be provided for workers in the interest of the workers and the environment.

Page 48 of 106 4.1.2.9 Loss of or Damage to Physical Cultural Resources During construction activities, there is the possibility of coming across or “chance finding” what may appear to be an historical or cultural artifact which may need to be studied and preserved by the relevant authorities.

One example is the sunken ship that became partially exposed on the Georgetown beach a few years ago.
In cases like this, the artifact could be lost due to careless construction activities prior to the relevant authorities determining whether or not it is worthy of preservation.

It is therefore recommended to consult with local stakeholders as to the final design of facility, and the disposition of any potential physical and cultural resources, because the valuation of such items is ultimately subjective and they are of most value to local stakeholders.
Page 49 of 106 5.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 5.1 Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures address the potential impacts of the projects to reduce or avoid any negative impact on the environment.

As indicated in the section on impacts, most of the negative impacts associated with the sub-projects are expected to occur during construction phase.

While these impacts are not expected to be major, the careful implementation of mitigation measures will allow for the reduction or avoidance of any adverse effects.
It is expected that the projects would receive adequate technical review by qualified technical professionals to ensure their technical and environmental soundness.

Engineering review for all construction details and designs should be integral in this process.

A number of general impacts have been identified above and the following in Table 4 is a list of the potential mitigation measures.
The measures are presented in a manner that makes them easily incorporated into an EMP and, with appropriate adjusting, can become contract clauses for the contractor who will undertake the civil works.

This also allows for ease of monitoring as well.

Additional mitigation measures would be derived from any conditions imposed by any statutory agency who reviewed the sub-projects and provided recommendations or conditionalities.

These could also be converted to contract clauses as necessary.

Table 4.
Table 4.

Impact Areas and Mitigation Measures IMPACT AREA MITIGATIVE MEASURES Traffic impacts (a) A traffic management plan to be developed and implemented by 1 contractor in consultation with the Traffic Department of the Royal St. Vincent and the Grenadines Police force.

(b) Alternative routes to be identified in the instance of extended road works or road blockages.

(c) The public to be notified of all disturbances to their normal routes.
(d) Signposting, warning signs, barriers and traffic diversions must be clearly visible and the public warned of all potential hazards.

(e) Provision must be made for the safe passages and crossings for all pedestrians where construction traffic interferes with their normal route.

(f) There must be active traffic management by trained and visible staff at the site or along roadways as required to ensure safe and convenient passage for the vehicular and pedestrian public.
(g) Adjustment of working hours to facilitate local traffic patterns, e.g.

avoiding major work activities during rush hours and do temporary road closures at night.

(a) Construction / work activities will occur within specified daylight hours e.g.

8:00 am to 4:00pm.

(b) Community / public to be informed in advance of any work activities to occur outside of normal working hours or on weekends.

(c) Sites should be hoarded wherever possible.


2 Noise Page 50 of 106 (d) During operations, the engine covers of generators, air compressors and other powered mechanical equipment shall be closed, and equipment placed as far away from residential areas as possible.

(e) There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites.

(f) Noise suppression equipment or systems supplied by manufacture will be utilized.

(g) Ensure all vehicles and equipment are properly serviced.
(h) The contractor must develop and implement a public notification and noise management plan.

(a) Contractor to develop and implement waste management plan in consultation with the local solid waste authorities.

(b) Contractor to abide by all pertinent waste management and public health laws.

(c) Waste collection and disposal pathways and sites will be identified for all major waste types expected from demolition and construction activities.
(d) Construction and demolition wastes will be stored in appropriate bins.

(e) Liquid and chemical wastes will be stored in appropriate containers separated from the general refuse.

(f) All waste will be collected and disposed of properly in approved landfills by licensed collectors.

(g) The records of waste disposal will be maintained as proof for proper management as designed.
(h) Whenever feasible the contractor will reuse and recycle appropriate and viable materials (except asbestos or other hazardous material).

(i) Construction related liquid wastes must not be allowed to accumulate on or off the site, or to flow over or from the site in an uncontrolled manner or to cause a nuisance or health risk due to its contents.
(a) Contractor must provide temporary storage on site for all hazardous or toxic substances in safe containers labeled with details of composition, properties and handling information.

(b) The containers of hazardous substances shall be placed in a leak-proof container to prevent spillage and leaching.

(c) The wastes shall be transported by specially licensed carriers and disposed in a licensed facility.

(d) Paints with toxic ingredients or solvents or lead-based paints will not be used.
(e) Banned chemicals will not be used on any project.

(f) If termite treatment is to be utilized, appropriate chemical management measures will be implemented to prevent contamination of surrounding areas and use only licensed and registered pest control professionals with training and knowledge of proper application methods and techniques.

(a) If asbestos is located on the project site, it shall be marked clearly as a hazardous material.
(b) If work has already commenced, all work in the area must stop immediately.

(c) An asbestos management plan must be prepared by the contractor and 3 Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general) 4 Solid and Liquid Waste Management for hazardous substances.

5 Solid and Liquid Waste Management for asbestos Page 51 of 106 approved by the relevant local health and waste management authorities.

(d) Where possible the asbestos and its location must be appropriately contained and sealed to minimize exposure.
(e) The asbestos prior to removal (if removal is necessary) will be treated with a wetting agent to minimize asbestos dust.

(f) Asbestos will be handled and disposed of by skilled & experienced professionals using appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) such as respirators and tyvec suites.

(g) If asbestos material is to be stored temporarily, the wastes should be secured within closed containments and marked appropriately.
(h) Security measures must be implemented against unauthorized removal of 6 Solid and Liquid Waste Management for Medical Wastes 7 Deforestation asbestos from the site.

(i) No removed asbestos will be reused.

(a) The contractor must ensure that all persons handling medical wastes are provided with proper protective clothing.

(b) All medical wastes must be treated as hazardous.

(c) All medical wastes must be secured in specially labeled and sealed containers separate from other wastes streams.
(d) All medical wastes must be disposed of in accordance with relevant local legislation at specified disposal sites.

(a) There must be no unnecessary clearing of natural vegetation.

(b) Avoid the use of herbicides or other chemicals.

(c) Any works to be undertaken in a protected forest area must be done under the supervision of a representative of the Forestry Department.

(d) The contractor must ensure that any work undertaken in the forest reserve be done by manual means.
(e) There must be minimal impact to flora and fauna in the forest area.

(f) All recognized natural habitats; wetlands and protected areas in the immediate vicinity of the activity must be protected from damage or exploitation.

(g) The contractor must ensure that all staff be strictly prohibited from hunting, foraging, logging or other damaging activities.
(h) A survey and an inventory shall be made of large trees and rare medicinal plants in the vicinity of the construction activity, these shall be marked and cordoned off with fencing, their root system protected, and any damage to the trees avoided.

(i) There will be no unlicensed borrow pits, quarries or waste dumps in protected areas.

(j) Upon completion, all wastes must be immediately removedfrom the forested area.
(a) Construction materials such as sand, cement, or other fines should be kept properly covered.

(b) Cement should be kept stored within a shed or container.

(c) The sand and fines should be kept moistened with sprays of water.

(d) Unpaved, dusty construction roads should be compacted and then wet periodically.

(e) During interior demolition debris-chutes shall be used above the first floor.
8 Air Quality Page 52 of 106 (f) Demolition debris shall be kept in controlled area and sprayed with water mist to reduce debris dust.

(g) During pneumatic drilling/wall destruction dust shall be suppressed by ongoing water spraying and/or installing dust screen enclosures at site (h) The surrounding environment (sidewalks, roads) shall be kept free of debris to minimize dust.

(i) There will be no open burning of construction / waste material at the site.
(j) There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites.

(k) The bins of all haulage vehicles transporting aggregate or building materials must be covered on all public roads.

(a) The contractor must implement all necessary waste management plans and measures.

(b) All construction materials, including chemicals, must be properly stored.
(c) The contractor will establish appropriate erosion and sediment control 9 Terrestrial and Marine Pollution measures such as hay bales, sedimentation basins, and / or silt fences and traps to prevent sediment from moving off site and causing excessive turbidity in nearby streams, rivers, wetlands, and coastal waters.
(d) If works are to be done along coastal marine areas or near major streams and rivers, water quality monitoring must be done before construction, and at regular intervals during construction to determine turbidity levels and other quality parameters.

(e) See soil erosion and slippage mitigation measures below.

(f) Construction vehicles and machinery will be washed only in designated 10 Soil Erosion and Slippage areas where runoff will not pollute natural surface water bodies.
(a) The contractor must ensure that appropriate erosion control measures such as silt fences are installed.

(b) Proper site drainage must be implemented, including drainage at the tops of slopes, around slopes, and beneath roadways.

(c) Any drain clogged by construction material or sediment must be unclogged as soon as possible to prevent overflow and flooding.

(d) The use of retaining structures and planting with deep rooted grasses to retain soil during and after works must be considered.
(e) The use of bio-engineering methods must be considered as a measure to reduce erosion and land slippage.

(f) Keep angle of slopes within limits of soil type.

(g) Balance cut and fill to limit steepness of slopes.

(h) All slopes and excavated areas must be monitored for movement.

(a) The contractor must ensure that an Occupational Health and Safety Plan is in place to guide work activities, and provide a safe environment for workers.
(b) The contractor must ensure that all workers operate within a safe environment.

(c) All relevant Labour and Occupational Health and Safety regulations must be adhered to ensure worker safety.

(d) Workers must be provided with necessary equipment as well as protective gear as per their specific tasks such as hard hats, overalls, gloves, goggles, boots, etc.

(e) Sanitary facilities must be provided for all workers on site.
11 Occupational Health and Safety Issues Page 53 of 106 12 Loss of or damage to Historical and Cultural Artifacts (f) The contractor must ensure that there are basic medical facilities on site and that there are staff trained in basic first aid.

(g) Appropriate posting of information within the site must be done to inform workers of key rules and regulations to follow.
(a) The contractor must ensure that provisions are put in place so that artifacts or other possible “chance finds” encountered in excavation or construction are noted and registered, responsible Authorities contacted, and works activities delayed or modified to account for such finds.

(b) No item believed to be an artifact must be removed or disturbed by any of the workers.

(c) Consultation with local community regarding final design of historical structures will be done as prudent.
Page 54 of 106 6.0 SCREENING PROCEDURES This section of the report provides an important element of the EMF document, namely the screening procedure for future work activities and subprojects.

At present the proposed works are known at a general level of detail and their potential impacts are also known only in a general sense.
The preliminary project descriptions, impact evaluations, and generalized mitigation measures given previously in this report therefore provide a good starting point, but as is often the case details and particulars may change over time.

In the future as detailed actions emerge and physical works ready to begin, the scope, scale, and design of particular activities become fully known.
At that time it will be necessary to ascertain their potential environmental impacts through a screening process, identify potential environmental impacts, and provide standardized mitigation measures in the form of an EMP and develop associated contract clauses to ensure they are indeed executed appropriately.
Perhaps more importantly it will be necessary to identify works which could have more significant impacts and which would require additional evaluation, assessment, and careful planning to best manage impacts during project execution.

Accordingly, this part of the report contains the guidelines, procedures and protocols that will be used to serve as a guide for environmental management of future subprojects or activities once they are defined in sufficient detail for execution.
6.1 Screening Processes Each sub-project may have site specific issues that contribute to potential environmental impacts.

A screening mechanism and a scoping exercise are key tools to assist assessing officers in red flagging potential environmental risks or issues as part of the assessment process at an early stage in the project identification cycle.
This process would allow for the highlighting of potential impacts, mitigation measures to address the potential impacts, and allowing for the incorporation of these mitigation measures as contract clauses for the proposed small works.

The Physical Planning Unit, the agency charged with regulating development in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, is in the process of developing an internal screening mechanism, elements of which are presented in Appendix 1, 2 and 3.
It is proposed that this screening checklist be used during the scoping exercise so that an officer may be able to determine that a project has certain environmental ramifications that were not previously identified.
As part of the general assessment process, The Bank, as the main project sponsor with its own internal procedures, has determined in general that the collective suite of potential sub-projects that together create the RDVRP program have resulted in a classification of “Category B” meaning that while there will be some negative impacts, they can be identified and managed through fairly standard means.
These would include, for simple projects, a generic standardized EMP that could highlight the general impact areas associated with the proposed construction activities, which would then feed into the generalized standard environmental contract clauses for the contractor to follow.

In most of the sub-projects identified in this RDVRP, this will be the case.
In other sub-projects, however, it will be found as details emerge that the possible environmental effects could be significant, that issues surrounding the proper management are more complex than previously assumed, or that sensitive areas or natural habitats require special Page 55 of 106 attention to avoid doing harm.
In those cases, additional study is merited in the form of a separate EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) appropriate to the scale of the potential effects, which would have as its end product a specific tailor-made EMP to best manage the project in question.
To facilitate the process it is necessary for the assessing individual or agency to use a screening or scoping tool, typically a checklist (Appendix 1, 2 and 3), to determine the potential red flags or issues, and to trigger specific responses as appropriate.

Checklists are simple tools that are easily used by the assessing officer or agency.
The checklist helps to identify and assess potential impacts and contribute to the wider decision making process involving the proposed project and project activities.

The checklists and its response should be feed into the EMP and proposed mitigation measures to address potential issues that have been identified and as necessary, trigger additional measures such as impact analysis.
6.2 Local Permitting The Physical Planning Unit (PPU) is the main authority with legislated responsibility for granting development permits or approvals in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
In doing so, this authority relies on reviews and approvals from the Physical Planning and Development Board, a body comprising both public and private sector personnel including the Central Water and Sewerage Authority (CWSA), the power company (VINLEC), the Police, the Kingstown Town Board, National Properties, Ministries of Environment, Transport and Works, Housing and Surveys, and Agriculture.
All development projects including commercial buildings, apartments, hotels, industrial building, residential or commercial subdivisions with civil works such as roads, drains, retaining walls, must submit their plans to the PPU/PPDB for approval before works can commence.

This is to ensure integrity in the designs as well as orderliness of the development in keeping with the national vision.
The PPU/PPDB utilizes their internal checklist to appraise such developments and to red flag any potential issues as part of the screening process.

As an evolving step, St. Vincent and the Grenadines has a Draft Environmental Management Act (2009) and Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations.
Among other things, the draft regulations set criteria and procedure to determine whether an activity is likely to significantly affect the environment and is therefore subject to an environmental impact assessment.

It requires all project proposals submitted to the government be sent to the Environment Department (an agency within the Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment) for environment screening and the Department’s comments shall be submitted to Cabinet.
Further, that all persons, agencies, institutions (whether public or private), unless exempted pursuant to the Regulations, shall, before embarking on a proposed project or activity, apply to the Environment Department for a determination whether such project or activity would require an environmental impact assessment.
During the scoping phase of the project assessment, the PPU officer uses his/her training and experience to make a determination bases on the degree of impact likely to be caused by the project due to its size, proximity to a coastal area, marine or terrestrial reserve and the existing topography that may be disturbed, using Appendix 1, 2 and 3.
For all projects in the RDVRP, the Page 56 of 106 requirements of the PPU must be followed, as well as all laws and regulations pertaining to environmental protection in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

In addition, for World Bank projects, there are additional criteria that are required specific to environmental aspects of the RDVRP.
6.3 Screening Criteria and Checklists In addition to the internal screening of Appendix 1, 2, and 3, the screening criteria for the DVRP projects addresses the environmental aspects and allows for flagging of the pertinent World Bank policy response if or as necessary.
To begin, it is necessary to determine whether a proposed project falls into one of two groups: those which involve more complex environmental conditions and/or potentially significant environmental effects (if unmitigated) and which therefore require more cautious planning efforts; or, those comprising relatively simple or uncomplicated works where the impacts are minimal (e.g., effects during construction of repairs and retrofitting) and which can be addressed through standardized or generic mitigation measures.
6.3.1 Relatively Complex Sub-projects There are several criteria to determine if a sub-project or activity is environmentally complex or may have potentially significant impacts if unmitigated.
These would include the following: • Potential impact to natural habitats (OP/BP 4.04): whether or not a specific activity or subproject would potentially affect land or water areas where the biological communities are formed largely by native plant and animal species where human activity has not essentially or heavily modified the area's primary ecological functions.
• Potential impact to physical cultural resources (OP/BP 4.11): whether or not a specific subproject or activity would potentially affect objects, sites, structures, natural features or landscapes that have archaeological, paleontological, historical, architectural, religious, aesthetic, or other cultural significance.
• Potential for Hazardous Waste: whether or not special or hazardous wastes would need to be handled, for example waste solvents, asbestos, medical waste, infectious or biohazard materials, or radioactive materials.
The following checklist in Table 5 is intended to be used as a first tier screen or adapted with modifications to fit the specific suite of sub-projects being considered by the RDVRP, to assist the PSIPMU, PPU and proposing agencies in determining if a project is likely to have significant environmental impacts or presents complex conditions for which an environmental assessment is required.

The information in Appendix 1, 2 and 3 may be used for more detailed and in-depth analysis as appropriate.
Page 57 of 106 Table 5.

Identification of Complex/Sensitive Sub-Projects or Activities Characteristic of Sub-project or Activity: Yes/No Observations 1.

Does the project involve construction of new roads, or major rehabilitation of existing roads?

2.

Does the project involve dam construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or strengthening?

3.

Does the project involve hazardous materials management and disposal (e.g.
asbestos, medical or infectious waste, solvents or gasoline) except small amounts normally used during construction?

4.

Will the project significantly modify any coastal zone features, reef or marine features?

5.

Could the project activities significantly affect any natural or protected areas or Forest Reserves located within 1 km of the Project?

6.

Could the project impact or affect the habitat of endangered species of plants or animals?

7.
7.

Would the project activities disrupt, trade and commerce or major economic activities of the country?

8.

Is the project within proximity of noise sensitive receptors like hospitals or schools?

9.

Could the project adversely affect critical resources such as drinking water diversions?

10.

Could the project adversely affect natural waterways (streams, rivers, or wetlands) by sedimentation, pollution, flooding, draining, or filling)?

11.
11.

Would the works adversely affect cultural property, including archeological and historical sites?

12.

Would the works require leveling and clearing of lands with natural habitat (those water or land areas where most of the original plant and animal species are still present)?

13.

Does the project involve the use of introduced, non- native species?

14.

Does the project involve the use of pesticides, herbicides, or other agents to destroy pests?

Page 58 of 106 15.
Page 58 of 106 15.

Does the project pose a high risk of causing landslides, slips, slumps, rock-falls, debris-flows, or excessive erosion?

16.

Will the project result in the violation of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines law, international treaty, or Bank policy?
In cases where it is suspected that a specific sub-project or activity could meet these criteria, the screening procedure would result in a positive determination and such subproject would require a separate stand-alone EIA to be done specifically for that sub-project.
For sub-projects requiring a stand-alone EIA, the EIA will be completed prior to initiation of the works and will establish environmental requirements for the design and construction phase of the activity in the form an EMP specific to that sub-project.

Guidance on preparing an EIA is included in Appendix 4.

World Bank staff may assist in preparing the TORs and reviewing the EIAs.
Based on the discussion and analysis of the RDVRP sub-projects presented in Section 4 of this report, most are fairly simple and do not involve significant impacts.

There are only a few which meet the criteria presented in Table 5 above and therefore merit additional analysis.
Once the details of the activities encompassed in those sub-projects are known with greater precision, the screening tools should be applied and an informed decision made with respect to the need for additional assessment and planning.

6.3.2 Relatively Simple Sub-projects If none of the criteria in Table 5 apply to a particular sub-project or activity, then it is considered to have only a limited and minor environmental impact.
Based on the discussion and analysis in Section 4 of this report, most of the sub-projects with minor civil works will involve only limited or minor impact, and can be easily mitigated by using standardized generic environmental controls that represent best practice for construction of civil works.
For the relatively uncomplicated environmental actions required of these activities, standardized generic construction contract clauses are sufficient, and can be applied as needed to works construction contracts.

Best management practices are provided as guidance in Appendix 5, 6 and 7 for various construction practices, and typical draft language for inclusion in contracts can be found in Appendix 8 of this report.

Further discussion of the generic EMP is provided in section 7 of this report.
6.4 Emergency Procedures Component 3 of the RDVRP is intended to provide financing for emergency sub-projects.

Because most of the elements financed under Component 3 are likely to be related to emergency provision of critical goods, it is expected that those subprojects will fall into Category C and therefore would require no environmental screening or assessment work.
However, some Component 3 activities could include demolition, removal, repair or reconstruction of damaged public infrastructure, clearing of debris, or other activities which could have potential negative Page 59 of 106 impacts if not mitigated, and would therefore fall into Category B.
It is even possible that there may be exceptional cases where a proposed sub-project would involve work in highly ecologically sensitive areas, potentially affect physical cultural resources, or require acquisition of substantial areas of land either temporarily or permanently for reconstruction work or relocation of a vulnerable population.
In order to ensure that Component 3 emergency subproject activities are consistent with the World Bank Safeguard Policies as outlined in this EA & EMF document, the activities identified for financing under Component 3 will be subject to an expedited review by safeguards specialists to determine if they are eligible under the safeguard policies and compliance procedures used by the PSIPMU for all activities financed under the RDVRP.
This will allow the possibility to exclude certain activities if the environmental or social impacts are too great, or to include appropriate mitigation measures for a proposed activity if feasible.

Having the existing safeguards screening process in place will also allow a certain degree of flexibility and efficiency in processing potential subprojects or activities.
Page 60 of 106 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN This section of the report describes the link between the predicted environmental impacts, the needed mitigation measures identified during the screening and assessment process, provisions for budgeting the costs of such measures, and the roles of those responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measures are carried out.
7.1 Mitigation Measures The mitigation measures for relatively simple environmental management issues are based on best management practice and industry standards.

These are the mitigation measures which are expected of all professional contractors who are performing civil works, and represent the minimum standard of execution for environmental protection during the execution of such works.
As discussed in Section 4 of this report, most of the civil works in the DVRP will be fairly straightforward and relatively simple from the point of view of environmental management, and only the standard generic mitigation measures need be considered.

Following in Table 6 is a listing of those measures, which have been described more fully in Table 4 under Mitigation Measures and need not be repeated here.
Best Management Practices are provided in Appendix 5, 6 and 7, and typical generic environmental clauses in Appendix 8 of this report will feed into the specific contract clauses for these types of works which are deemed to have minimal or limited impacts.

The following Table 6 provides the elements of the standardized EMP for civil works that have minimal or limited impacts.

Monitoring responsibilities and time frames are also included.

Table 6.
Table 6.

Standard Minimum Elements of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Category Project of Impact Area Mitigation Measures Mitigation Responsibility Monitoring Frequency Air Quality Rehabilitation or demolition existing of buildings.
Traffic Impacts Noise Page 61 of 106 per As per mitigation measures (a) to (k) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (h) per Contractor Site inspection Weekly Contractor Contractor Weekly Weekly Police traffic reports Civil society complaints, interviews and Liquid Solid Waste Management (general) and Liquid Solid Waste Management (hazardous) Occupational Health and Safety Issues Solid and Liquid Waste Management (Medical Wastes) New Building and general construction Air Quality Traffic Impacts Noise Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general) Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous) Occupational Health and Safety Issues Terrestrial Marine Pollution and Soil Erosion Slippage and Page 62 of 106 per per As mitigation measures (a) to (i) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (d) per per per per per per As mitigation measures (a) to (k) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (h) As mitigation measures (a) to (i) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (h) per per per per Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Disposal records, site inspection Disposal records, site inspection Workers report, medical records Disposal records, site inspection Site inspection Police traffic reports Civil society complaints, interviews Disposal records, site inspection Disposal records, site inspection Workers report, medical records Site inspection, marine reports Site inspection Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Loss of or damage to Historical and Cultural Artifacts Deforestation Air Quality Road and drain construction and rehabilitation Terrestrial Marine Pollution and Soil Erosion Slippage and Occupational Health and Safety Issues Terrestrial Marine Pollution and Solid and Liquid Waste
 Management (general) Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous Traffic Impacts River, flood mitigation, and Bridge Works Air Quality Soil Erosion Slippage and Page 63 of 106 per As mitigation measures (a) to (b) As mitigation measures (a) to (j) per per per per per As mitigation measures (a) to (k) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (h) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (i) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) per per per per per As mitigation measures (a) to (k) As mitigation measures (a) to (h) per Contractor Site visits Weekly Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Contractor Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Site visits and forestry reports Site visits, community reports Site inspections , marine reports Site visit /inspection Medical reports, workers interview Contractor Weekly contractor contractor Contractor Weekly Weekly Weekly Disposal records, site visits Disposal records, site visits Traffic police report Contractor Weekly Site visit, water quality test Contractor Site inspection Weekly Occupational Health and Safety Issues Terrestrial Marine Pollution and and Liquid Solid Waste Management (general) Traffic Impacts Solid and Liquid Waste Management (hazardous Slope Stabilization Soil Erosion Slippage and Occupational Health and Safety Issues Solid and Liquid Waste Management (general) Minor works civil and Liquid Solid Waste Management (general) Occupational Health and Safety Issues per per As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) As mitigation measures (a) to (j) per per As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (f) per per per As mitigation measures (a) to (h) As mitigation measures (a) to (g) As mitigation measures (a) to (j) per per As mitigation measures (a) to (j) As mitigation measures (a) to (j) per Contractor Medical log Weekly Contractor Contractor Contractor contractor
 Weekly Weekly Weekly Weekly Site visits, stakeholder reports Site inspection, waste manageme nt log Traffic department log Disposal records, site inspections Contractor Site inspection Weekly contractor contractor Weekly Weekly Medical log, workers interview Disposal records, site inspections Contractor Disposal record Weekly Contractor Weekly Workers interview, medical records The proposed sub-projects in the RDVRP can be classified into the general categories in Table 6 based on the types of works for which impacts can be determined and mitigation measures already identified in Table 4 (Impact Areas and Mitigation Measures).
For example, the works to be done on the community centres and schools can be classified as rehabilitation or demolition of existing buildings.

New construction would include new structures such as storage facilities, Page 64 of 106 or warehouses.

Road and drain construction and rehabilitation, River and Bridge Works and slope stabilization works are also provided with separate categories in Table 6 above.
These categories provide guidelines for the selection of the appropriate mitigation measures to be included, as a minimum, in contract documents for each type of project.

If PPU approval has been sought and granted for the relevant sub-project, then the generic minimum mitigation measures and monitoring conditions in Table 6 above should be amended to include the conditions and recommendations of the PPU.
If an EIA has been conducted for a particular sub-project due to its environmentally sensitive or complex nature, then the specific recommendations for mitigation measures in that EIA should also be included in the specific EMP for that sub-project as well, in addition to the standard minimum EMP in Table 6 above.
7.2 Environmental Performance Clauses for Works Contracts Standard environmental related clauses were developed and are to be appended to or incorporated into the contracts as necessary depending on the type of works to be conducted or the findings of the checklist by the appraising project officer.

These form part of the environmental management plan and the mitigation measure presented there.
These clauses are general and may be modified to conform to applicable laws and contract procedures of St. Vincent and the Grenadines for such works and shall remain in force throughout the contract period.
Generic contract clauses are provided in Appendix 8 for the following general conditions for small civil works, roads, buildings, and other works expected to have minor impacts: • Permits and Approvals • Site Security • Discovery of Antiquities • Worker Occupational Health and Safety • Noise Control • Use and Management of Hazardous Materials, fuels, solvents and petroleum products • Use and Management of Pesticides • Use of Preservatives and Paint Substances • Use of Explosives • Site Stabilization and Erosion Control • Traffic Management • Management of Standing Water • Management of Solid Wastes -trash and construction debris • Management of Liquid Wastes Additional clauses for the following special conditions are also within Appendix 8: • Management of Medical Wastes • Management of Asbestos • Water Pipeline Installation Page 65 of 106 • Works in designated Forest Reserves It is expected that these generic clauses will be incorporated into all contracts, as applicable.
In addition, specific project-related recommendations may also be forthcoming from statutory bodies that are part of the permitting agencies such as the CWSA or VINLEC and that these can be reformatted in to contract clauses as well.

Finally, if an EIA has been conducted for a particular sub-project due to its environmentally sensitive or complex nature (see section 6), then the specific recommendations for mitigation measures in that EIA should also be included as contract clauses.
For purposes of cost estimation and budgeting, the contractors should be aware of the existence of the environmental mitigation measures and associated EMP requirements, and include cost items for such purposes in their proposals.

7.3 Supervision, Monitoring, and Reporting A unified and integrated approach must be adopted in reviewing the EMP, monitoring the projects from pre to post positions, and responding to any issue that may arise.
The purpose of the EMP and its conditions reflected in the construction and operational contract are to ensure accepted good practices are employed and maintained in order to mitigate any adverse environmental impacts.

The person or entity responsible for on-ground implementation and abiding by the contract clauses, recommendations, and mitigation measures will be the contractor.
The frequency of monitoring will be determined by the requesting agencies, but will be frequent enough to allow them to determine site changes, the environmental conditions, the adequacy of the mitigation measures, and the overall ability of the contractor to execute the works in the specified and sustainable manner.

The overall agency with the responsibility to supervise and monitor the sub-projects is the PSIPMU.
The PSIPMU would have the ability to co-opt other technical departments and ministries to assist in executing this duty especially where it came to monitoring and report on the technical aspects of the civil works.
However, the PSIPMU simply does not have the staff to facilitate assessment of each sub-project or to carry out any form of extensive monitoring, so it expected that the agencies who requesting the work, or hired consultants, will need to exercise the simple checklist and provide their findings as part of the project document to the PPU for review and approval.

Any findings and approval conditions will have to be incorporated into the project documents and contract clauses.
The agencies will also have to be part of the monitoring and reporting effort to support the PSIMPU’s efforts.

Understanding that environmental management is a cross-sectorial task especially within a small island developing states like St. Vincent and the Grenadines with limited financial and technical resources, the agencies must collaborate to monitor projects and to ensure sustainable development.
The Project Coordination Unit (PSIPMU) will serve as overall project coordinator for the RDVRP project undertaking the tasks of evaluation, supervision and implementation.
The Environmental Coordinating Unit in the Ministry of Health Wellness and the Environment as the country’s environmental lead agency will serve as the Project’s technical advisory unit and co- Page 66 of 106 opt other technical Ministries and departments as necessary to assist in those functions to ensure fruitful project implementation and sustainability.
It is expected that the PSIPMU, in ensuring the sustainability of the various projects, would assist in ensuring that they are subject to review by the PPU and that approval is granted prior to implementation.

The PPU is expected to provide timely reviews of the projects, reverting to the PSIPMU within a predetermined timeframe that considers the PSIPMU’s requirement for a speedy turnaround time to facilitate project implementation in such cases.
Supervision for environmental compliance will be managed jointly by the Environmental Coordinating Unit and the PSIPMU with periodic technical assistance from the Bank.

The PSIPMU will designate a field representative who shall conduct periodic inspections to assure environmental compliance.

In addition to Bank requirements, the PSIPMU will also be responsible for ensuring the proper application of any national environmental requirements.
The to support PSIPMU should staff an additional environmental specialist or engineer environmental supervision, especially as regards inspection in the field.

Page 67 of 106 8.0 DISCLOSURE WORKSHOP / PUBLIC CONSULTATION The desired state of the environment in St. Vincent was investigated through a recent (2010) consultation effort in the UN’s National Environmental Summary.
The results of interviews, national consultation, and information review revealed the six major environmental issues in St. Vincent are the following (UNEP, 2010): • “The Effects of Climate Change: The effects of global climate change are being felt in SVG in which the climate patterns are noticeably changing into extreme weather events.
A period of drought in 2009 has an effect on the agricultural sector and in addition, has fuelled further land degradation and loss of critical coverage in the forest sector due to the increased incidence of fires9.

In addition, the intensity in rainfall is increasing which are also contributing to increased erosion and land slippages in many areas.

The drought has also triggered a rethinking of SVGs policy of freshwater management.
• Deforestation: By law, any land above the 1000 ft contour is classified as state land and as such majority of forested lands are under government control10.

Illegal marijuana cultivation is done on squatted forest lands often in the higher elevations (in watershed areas) and in areas that are unstable (e.g.

on slopes on the La Soufriere area)11.


This has lead to a significant level of deforestation and concomitant problems include uncontrolled erosion, loss of biodiversity, degradation of critical habitats and watershed area and contamination of the drinking water sources.

As in the case of water, it is noted that is not unusual for water to arrive in homes heavily laden with sediments despite having passed through the treatment process (sedimentation, filtration and chlorination)12.
Although a significant amount of programme intervention was done by the Government to curb deforestation, the problems are short of being abated.

Of the 29% of forest area in St Vincent, 27% of this total is classified as planted forests13, thus demonstrating the magnitude of the problem but also the response effort.
• Land Degradation: Constrained by the small size of the island, topography and increasing population, St. Vincent has limited land available (36,423 ha) for commercial development, housing, recreation, agriculture and other uses.

Currently, there is no National Physical Development Plan to direct growth and development and to facilitate more comprehensive planning which embraces land zoning.
This has resulted in incompatible land use in many areas which has resulted in soil erosion, land slippage and pollution of waterways.

• Lost of Agricultural Lands to Development: Previously the agricultural sector in St Vincent was characterised by a vibrant banana production.

However, the loss of preferential access to the European Union has significantly reduced the agricultural output and many farms were abandoned.
The agricultural lands (especially those privately owned, which is in the majority, if not all) are being converted to housing and other forms of development.

Given the private leasehold issue, little control is being exerted by the Government in addition, the weak land use planning mechanism currently in place, brings little or no solution to the issue.
Within the context of sustainable land management, the loss of agricultural lands to these somewhat irreversible land uses have long term implications for food security in SVG.

Page 68 of 106 • Pollution of Coastal Water and River system: Land-based sources of pollution are mainly from sediments, agrochemical leaching, direct agrochemical influx, industrial and commercial discharge, liquid waste, and storm water runoff from city streets and construction sites.
The issue of pollution is affecting the river and coastal water quality, but is also impacting on the habitats.

Ship generated waste is major issue in SVG, as it is known that some small ships and pleasure crafts traversing the waters of SVG dump their waste into the sea within the EEZ of the country14 and the poor surveillance system serves little as a deterrent.

• Solid Waste: SVG has a good waste collection system but indiscriminate and improper dumping of waste is an issue.
In particular, plastics bottles and containers (the changing consumption patterns from local to more imported foods are driving this increase) and derelict vehicles are the forms of waste which are not adequately captured by the current waste management collection.
In particular, enforcing the waste management laws seem to be the challenges specifically with regard to illegal dumping and enforcement are largely based of voluntary.” A workshop was conducted to obtain agency and public feedback on the draft EMF, and to identify any revisions necessary to better reflect the goals and activities of the RDVRP.

Appendix 9 contains summaries, attendance lists from the review workshop.
This EMF document was revised in April 2014 and February 2016 and redisclosed, as detailed in Appendix 10.

Page 69 of 106 9.0 TECHNICAL REFERENCES Byrne, J. St. Vincent & the Grenadines Protected Areas System Gap Assessment.

Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat and The Nature Convervancy, First Workshop, March 9th & 10th, 2006.

Culzac-Wilson, L. Important Bird Areas – AMERICAS, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Avian Eyes, 2009.

De Graff, Jerome.

Land Slide Hazards of St. Vincent, West Indies.


U S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fresno California.

January 1988.

ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean).

An Assessment of the Economic Impact of Climate Change on the Water Sector in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

United Nations, October 2011.

Eur-OPA.

Major Hazards Agreement.

Hazards.

http://www.besafenet.org/ main/default.aspx?it=1&tabid=49&itemid=1227.

Knights, R.D.

and Joslyn, Otis R.F.


Climate Change and Biodiversity in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Convention on Biological Diversity, Meeting February 25-29 2008, Panama City, Panama.

February 2008.

Gibbs, T. Natural Hazards in the Caribbean.

U.S. Geological Survey, 2001.

Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Draft Environmental Management Act, 2009.

Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Draft Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2009.
Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

National Economic and Social Development Plan 2013-2025.

Government of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Physical Development Act no 21 of 2001.

Highland, L.M., and Bobrowsky, Peter.


The landslide handbook—A guide to understanding landslides: Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1325, 2008. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1325/pdf/C1325_508.pdf Le Friant, A., Goudon, G., Arnulf, A., and Robertson, R. Debris avalanche deposits offshore St. Vincent (West Indies): Impact of flank-collapse events on the morphological evolution of the island.

Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 179, p. 1-10.

2009.
2009.

Ministry of Health, Wellness and the Environment.

National Report, Third International Conference on Small Island Developing States.

July 2013.

Page 70 of 106 Ministry of Transport and Works.

Flash Flood 2011: Damage Assessment Report, Final.

2011.

National Environmental Advisory Board and Ministry of Health and the Environment.

Initial National Communication on Climate Change, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Prepared under the United Nations Framework for Climate Change, CPACC (Caribbean Planning for Adaptation to Climate Change).

November 2000.

Public Sector Investment Programme Management Unit, Ministry of Finance, Government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Hydrology / Hydraulic Analysis & Geotechnical Studies for (i) South River Bridge; (ii) Bridges and Fords on Fenton to Green Hill Road (iii) Arnos Vale Watershed Area.

December, 2013.
December, 2013.

Robertson, R. Final Report on Sustainable Land Management St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

UNDP-GEF project, 2012.

Robertson, R. Volcanic hazard atlas of the Lesser Antilles – St. Vincent and The Grenadines.

University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago, W.I., Seismic Research Unit, 241-273.

2005.

Robertson, R. The Volcanic Geology of the Pre-Soufriere Rocks of St. Vincent, West Indies, 2002.

Singh, A., and Wilson J.


National Environmental Summary (NES), St. Vincent and the Grenadines, 2010.

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2010.

SVG National Physical Development Plan: Preliminary Methodological Framework Report.

Stephen Kemp BA, DipTP, MRTPI, FRSA 16th October 2013.

The Caribbean Conservation Association.

St. Vincent Country Environmental Profile.

St. Michael, Barbados.

1991.

UWI.

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Eastern Caribbean Islands.
The University of the West Indies, Seismic Research Centre, 2011.

Wade, A. Barry.

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT, The Need for a CZM Programme, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Environmental Solutions Ltd. Kingston 6, Jamaica.

October 10, 2013.

Page 71 of 106 APPENDICES Page 72 of 106 Appendix 1 – Project Environmental Screening Checklist Form - Part 1 Part 1 – Project and Sponsor Information.

The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1.
These responses will become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification.

Complete Part 1 based on information currently available and information provided on site plans.

Complete all items in Part 1.

You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the evaluators; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item.
Name of Action/Project: PART 1-PROJECT AND SPONSOR INFORMATION Project Location (describe, and attach a location map): Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: E-Mail: Address: Brief Description of Proposed Action/Project: SITE INFORMATION Total acreage of the site of the proposed action?

Total acreage to be physically disturbed?

Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor?
LAND USE AND PLANs Check all land uses that occur on, adjoining and near the proposed action.

acres acres acres Urban Rural Industrial Residential Commercial Forest Agriculture Page 73 of 106 Other Specify__________________________________ Parkland Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Is the proposed action consistent with adjacent uses?

Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape?
Is the proposed action/project compatible with the National Development Plan and other development plans?

Is the site of the proposed action located in or adjoin an environmentally sensitive or valuable area?

If Yes, specify: TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels?

Are public transportation service(s) available at or near the site of the proposed action?

UTILITIES Will the proposed action connect to an existing public water supply?
Will improvements be necessary to allow for connection?

Will the proposed action/project be able to connect to an existing roadway?

Will improvements be necessary?

Will project require the re-location of existing roadways, drainage and other utilities?

Will the proposed action/project require connection to the electrical grid after construction?

Will the proposed action connect to an existing wastewater utility?

What method is proposed to handle sanitary wastewater?
Please specify ______________________________________________________________________ WATER Will the proposed action/project require connection to water mains?

Will the project include any water conservation devices/techniques?

Will the project include any rainwater capturing devices?

AESTHETICS AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Is the project site known to contain any scenic vistas or recreation area that are important to the community?

Is the proposed action located in an archaeological sensitive area?
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining contain wetlands or other water bodies?

Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or water body?

If Yes, identify the wetland or water body and extent of alterations?

VEGETATION Identify the typical habitat types that occur on, or are likely to be found on the project site.
Check all that apply: Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Acres Shoreline/Beach Forest Farmland Pasture Page 74 of 106 Wetland Urban Rural SENSITIVE OR THREATENED SPECIES Does the site of the proposed action or surrounding sites contain any species of animal or plant that are known to be threatened or endangered?

STORMWATER/DRAINAGE Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non- point sources Will the storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties?
Will the storm water discharges flow to offsite drainage?

Will storm water flow to onsite conveyance or drainage features/devices?

Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of water or other liquids (e.g.

retention pond, waste lagoon, dam)?

Please describe: Yes No N/A Yes No N/A NATURAL HAZARDS Is the project site located in an area that is prone to flooding?

Is the project site located in an area that is prone to landslides?
Is the project located in an area that can be inundated by storm surge?

In what volcanic hazard zone is the project located?

Is the project site located in a coastal area that can be impacted by coastal erosion due to sea level rise and/or strong wave action?
Yes No N/A I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: ___________________________________________ Date: ___________________________ Signature: _______________________________________________________ Page 75 of 106 Appendix 2 – Project Environmental Screening Checklist Form - Part 2 Part 2 – Preliminary Screening of Environmental Impact.

The Lead/Approving Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2.
Answer all of the following questions using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer.
When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept “Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?” LAND USE AND PLANS NO TO MINIMAL IMPACT MODERATE IMPACT LARGE IMPACT Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or surrounding uses?

Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land?

Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community?
Will the project conflict with any existing or planned adjacent uses?

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure?

UTILITIES Will major works be required to allow the project to connect to utilities?

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion, flooding or drainage problems?
Will storm water quality and quantity control devices/techniques be incorporated into project?

SUSTAINABILITY Will the project incorporate any green/sustainable building practices/techniques?

Will the project incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities?

Will the project incorporate energy conservation practices?

Will the proposed action have an impact on existing water supplies?
Will the project incorporate reasonably available water conservation fixtures/devices?

Will the project incorporate water conservation practices?

NATURAL RESOURCES Will the proposed action have an impact on environmentally sensitive areas (steep slopes, rivers, flood Page 76 of 106 plains, unique habitats, etc)?

Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources (e.g., forests, wetlands, waterbodies, groundwater, air quality, flora and fauna)?
Will the project result in a decrease in farmland?

Will the project affect any endangered or threatened plant or animal species (on project or adjacent site)?

AESTHETIC, CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources?

Will the project result in the disturbance/removal of significant historical/cultural resources?
PEST MANAGEMENT Will the project result in the increased use of chemicals used for the control/treatment of pests?

Will the project employ the use of Integrated Pest Control?

NO IMPACT TO MINIMAL IMPACT For all selections in this column, little impact is anticipated; some explanation for why the impact is minimal or mitigation to be used will be required.

MODERATE IMPACT For selections in this column, moderate impact is anticipated.

Documentation will be required that analyses the impacts expected.
Mitigation measures that are planned to be implemented to reduce these impacts will need to be presented.

LARGE IMPACT Large impacts are anticipated by the proposed project.

If >75% of answers are checked in the ‘No to Minimal Impact’ column, no further assessment is needed but documentation and some explanation may be required to verify that the anticipated impacts are minimal and that any mitigation measures that are to be implemented in the areas addressed in the Part 1 and Part 2 are adequate.
If 75% of answers fall within the ‘Moderate Impact’ or the ‘Large Impact’ column, please provide an EIS that fully examines the proposed project using the format provided in the Environmental Management Framework (EMF), Appendix 3 and 4.

An EIS should, in sufficient detail, identify the impacts, including any mitigation measures that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts.
It should also explain how the lead/approval agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.

Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring, duration, irreversibility, geographic scope and magnitude.

Also consider the potential for short-term, long-term and cumulative impacts.

This document should be completed by the lead/approving agency or on their behalf.
Page 77 of 106 Appendix 3 – Guidelines for Using the Project Environmental Screening Checklist Purpose This Appendix gives the Guidelines for completing the Environmental Screening Checklist Forms (Parts 1 & 2), and provides guidance on how to proceed with an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) should one be required.

Overview Natural resources are limited and every effort should be made to protect them.
There is no doubt that development often results in the destruction of valuable resources, but as proposed projects often have social and economic benefits, there is a need for a process that evaluates the negative and positive impacts on natural resources, social and economic effects.

The environmental review process provides for the detailed analysis of a proposed project.

It identifies the public need and other social, economic and environmental benefits of the project and potential adverse impacts.
The process allows stakeholders to weigh the benefits and adverse impacts of a project.

Given the complexity of most projects – delivery timeframe, the variety of environmental settings and the dynamics of natural environmental management/monitoring technology - a single standalone EMP is often inadequate.

This framework and the management processes it describes are continuous institutional functions and not functions that are triggered only by individual development proposals.
The framework establishes ambient or acceptable limits and triggers.

The triggers are signals in advance of the limits that allows for evaluation, adjustment and invocation on an on-going basis.

If the trigger or limit is exceeded there will be a management response.

In general, environmental management framework has three components: the management and planning process, the environmental impact assessment process and the regulatory process.

Table 1.
Environmental Management Framework – Components EMF Component Environmental Management (EMP) Plan Elements of EMF components Category of project Area of Impact Mitigation measure Monitoring Frequency of Monitoring Potential Changes in baseline or ambient conditions of Site: Clearing, demolition Triggers Project application and checklist Checklist results, Potential for significant change in physical environment (>10%) Physical Environment: Land, water, air, vegetation, animals 10% change from baseline or ambient condition Social Conditions: Housing, jobs, utilities % of resident population affected Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Page 78 of 106 Aesthetics, Cultural visibility, conformity, findings.
and Historic: Any artefact discovered or disturbed Waste Management: Solid and Liquid waste, medical waste hazardous that Any potential changes ambient conditions by 1%.

spill for material, Regulations; levels for Monitoring trigger Legal obligations for deviation from norm; Management response, There should be baseline data to change.
determine Legislations/regulations often carries penalties and corrective measures The information in the remainder of this framework document provides guidelines on how to do, manage and monitor various types of subprojects presented in the RDVRP.

Environmental Documentation Environmental documents present the anticipated impacts, negative and positive, and allows for an objective analysis of costs and benefits related to a proposed project.
An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be the primary source of environmental information to help stakeholders and decision makers make informed decisions regarding the proposed action.

The EIS accomplishes those goals by examining the nature and extent of identified potential environmental impacts of an action.

Importantly, steps that could be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts must also be presented.

An EIS is not appropriate for all projects.


In some instances a generic and standard Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that addresses specific issues will suffice.

Deciding between an assessment or an impact is somewhat subjective, but examining the project and using forms and checklists can help determine what type of documentation is needed.

Appendix 5 presents the environmental checklist assessment forms that are to be used as screening tools for projects.
Part 2-Impact Assessment should be completed for those projects that are likely to have adverse impacts based on the Part 1 Environmental Assessment Form.

The Part 2 Impact Assessment triggers additional documentation as follows: If > 75% of answers are checked in the ‘No to Minimal Impact’ column, please provide a document that explains why the impacts are anticipated to be minimal and any mitigation measures that are to be implemented in the areas addressed in the Part 1 and Part 2.
If 75% of answers fall within the ‘Moderate Impact’ or the ‘Large Impact’ column, please provide an EIS that fully examines the proposed project using the format provided in Appendix 4 of this Environmental Management Framework (EMF).

Table 2 below gives some suggested triggers for selected environment resources that may be affected by civil works during the implementation of the RDVRP.
These triggers are very generic since the baseline conditions are assumed conditions and national standards or tolerant levels do not exist in most cases.

Page 79 of 106 Table 2.

Baseline conditions and suggested triggers.


Baseline conditions No visible smoke or dust; CO2, NO2< 0.01% Particulate matter (PM2.5) < 0.01% Colour clear and consistent, PH levels between 6 and 7.5, Odourless, Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 8-10 parts per million (ppm), presence of aquatic life Natural colour, home to normal community of animals, growth pattern consistent, reproduction process good.
Tidal movement and sand deposit pattern; presence of crabs and other community members, Two lane normal flowing traffic, minimal movement of heavy equipment.

spatial, absence of Quiet, stockpiles, free flowing traffic, regular supply of services from utilities.

Triggers Decreased visibility – presence of smoke or dust for more than for more than 30 minutes.

CO2, NO2, PM2.5> 0.019% Increase turbidity, PH < 6 or > 8 Presence of odour, DO <5 ppm.

Absence of life in the water.


Discolouration, of absence community normal members, Absence of flowers and fruits at appropriate season, defoliation.

More vegetation covers.

Changes in coastal dynamics- sand deposition pattern, erosion pattern; Decrease in animal population Single lane traffic, more than 5 minutes delay at bottleneck, Frequent movement of heavy equipment.

Presence of piles of waste, debris, construction material etc.

disrupting visibility; traffic, disruption to utilities.
than xx% removal of Resource Impacted Air Water bodies Vegetation cover Coastal Resource Traffic Residential Communities Page 80 of 106 Appendix 4 – Guidelines for Preparing an EIS Public Involvement The environmental process should be a public and transparent process in which citizens are involved as it is citizens that will be impacted.
Most major projects will have impacts, negative and positive, on the community in which it is located and immediately surrounding communities; however, some projects may have more far-reaching effects; therefore, public involvement may need to be national and not just in affected communities.

Ecologic, social and economic impacts need to be properly evaluated for the proposed project and alternatives.
The scoping process or a process that decides what issues are important to the project and that should be addressed in environmental documents including Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must involve citizens.

Additionally, the public should also be allowed to comment on EISs for moderate to large scale projects during a comment period and their comments addressed in a follow-up document.
Typical Format for EIS • Cover Sheet • Table of Contents • Summary • Description of the proposed action o Introduction o Project Background, Need, Objectives and Benefits o Project Location and Existing Site Conditions o Project Design and Site Layout o Construction, Operation and Schedule o Permits and Approvals Required • Natural Resource Setting (examples only; add/remove as needed) o Soils and Topography Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation o Water Resources Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation o Ecological Resources Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation • Social Setting (examples only; add/remove as needed) o Transportation Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Page 81 of 106 Proposed Mitigation o Land Use, Land Use Plans and Zoning o Community Facilities and Services Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation o Cultural Resources Existing Conditions Anticipated Impacts Proposed Mitigation o Aesthetic Resources and Community Character • Construction-Related Impacts • Cumulative Impacts o Economic Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources • Adverse Impacts That Cannot Be Avoided • • Growth-Inducing Aspects • Alternative 1: Apply mitigation • Alternative 2: Downscale the Project • Alternative 3: Redesign or relocate • Alternative 4: Abandon project A brief background of the project must be provided early on in any documentation.
The project must be clearly defined and all issues/impacts presented and evaluated in an unbiased manner.

Maps, graphics, photographs, site plans, renderings and other data should be included in any documentation.

Impacts on natural resources like soils, water, vegetation, terrestrial and marine species clearly defined.

Social impacts should also be presented.


Impacts on transportation, infrastructure, energy, drainage, sewage, education, health, safety, noise, security, land use, planned projects, community facilities, utilities, cultural and historical resources and community character must be presented and analysed.

All economic impacts must also be presented with supporting data/studies, etc.

Importantly, alternatives to the proposed project must be presented and evaluated.
The description of the proposed action should include: 1.

The purpose or objective of the action, including any public need for, or public benefits from the action, including social and economic considerations; 2.

The location and physical dimensions of the action; 3.

The background and history of the action, or site; Page 82 of 106 4.
Timing and schedule for implementing the action, including construction and operations phases, to the extent the information is available, or can reasonably be estimated; 5.

Relationship of the action to land use plans, zoning restrictions, and other adopted plans and programs at the local or regional level; and 6.

Identification of authorizations permits and approvals required.
Best Practice in EIA Preparation Environmental Impact Assessment should be: Purposive – the process should inform decision-making and result in appropriate levels of environmental protection and community well-being.

Rigorous – the process should apply 'best practicable' science, employing methodologies and techniques appropriate to address the problems being investigated.
Practical – the process should result in information and outputs which assist with problem solving and are acceptable to and able to be implemented by proponents.

Cost-effective – the process should achieve the objectives of EIA within the limits of available information, time, resources and methodology.

Efficient – the process should impose the minimum cost burdens in terms of time and finance on proponents and participants consistent with meeting accepted requirements and objectives of EIA.
Focused – the process should concentrate on significant environmental effects and key issues; i.e., the matters that need to be taken into account in making decisions.

Adaptive – the process should be adjusted to the realities, issues and circumstances of the proposals under review without compromising the integrity of the process, and be iterative, incorporating lessons learned throughout the proposal’s life cycle.
Participative – the process should provide appropriate opportunities to inform and involve the interested and affected publics, and their inputs and concerns should be addressed explicitly in the documentation and decision-making.

Interdisciplinary – the process should ensure that the appropriate techniques and experts in the relevant biophysical and socioeconomic disciplines are employed, including use of traditional knowledge as relevant.
Credible – the process should be carried out with professionalism, rigor, fairness, objectivity, impartiality and balance, and be subject to independent checks and verification.

Integrated – the process should address the interrelationships of social, economic and biophysical aspects.
Page 83 of 106 Transparent – the process should have clear, easily understood requirements for EIA content; ensure public access to information; identify the factors that are to be taken into account in decision making; and acknowledge limitations and difficulties.

Systematic – the process should result in full consideration of all relevant information on the affected environment, of proposed alternatives and their impacts, and of the measures necessary to monitor and investigate residual effects.
Natural Resource Setting All natural resources that will be or have the potential to be adversely affected by the proposed project need to be examined and analysed in environmental documentation.

Given the geologic history, soils and topography of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, any and all development needs to be properly planned and potential adverse environmental impacts examined.
Additionally, given the propensity for landslides in St. Vincent and flooding and the fact that the country is prone to numerous natural hazards, much thought needs to be given to projects that involve impacts on natural resources.

The type of soil in an area needs to be considered, as well as, and in conjunction with slope and vegetation.
Given the propensity for landslide in St. Vincent, in particular, care needs to be taken with development that requires excavations and which disturbs vegetation and soil.

Therefore, all proposed projects that involve the removal of vegetation and disturbance of soil and slopes needs to be a priority in environmental documentation.

Additionally, hydrology and drainage areas, waterways/streams/rivers and associated flood plains need to be considered and presented in an EIS and other documentation.
The project site and surrounding areas need the presence of important/significant or endangered species.

If such species are present the project team should weigh the need and benefits of the project against the ecological benefits of the specie(s) in questions and/or consider alternatives to the proposed project.

to be evaluated for Social Setting The social setting of a proposed project examines the services available and characteristics of a community.
It covers such topics as transportation, land use, educational facilities, aesthetic and cultural resources and other elements important to a community.

If a proposed project is likely to have a significant impact, negative or positive, on a community, constituency or the nation it needs to be presented as part of the environmental documentation associated with a project.
If for instance, a project will require the re-routing of traffic or the relocation of a main roadway, it needs to be discussed in an EIS or other document.

All social impacts must be presented in an unbiased manner to allow for the proper evaluation of benefits and costs of the proposed project.

Page 84 of 106 Coastal and Marine Resources Sea level rise is a great threat to the beaches, low-lying areas and coastal infrastructure in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Due to the limited amount of low-lying areas and the fact that critical facilities are located in proximity to the coastline, sea level rise and the resultant coastal erosion and loss of land will have an impact on the island and its economy.

Add more intense and frequent hurricanes and tropical storms to the steep and rugged topography of St. Vincent the result is the potential for serious floods and landslides.
In addition to sea level rise caused by melting snow caps and glaciers, a warming world means warmer oceans.

Water expands as it warms, so not only will sea levels rise because of melting ice caps and glaciers but it will expand thermally.

Globally and regionally, this means death to coral reefs and increase storm surges.

Any damage to the reef may result in stronger wave action near shore which could exacerbate coastal erosion problems.
Additionally, warming ocean temperatures will have a negative effect on reefs and the species that depend on it.

This will in turn affect fisheries, diving, snorkelling and other water-based activities around the islands, thereby threatening tourism and the economy.

Climate Change Climate change is a global issue that should and must be a priority for St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Although the Caribbean region contributes much less greenhouse gases to the atmosphere than industrialized nations, this will not lessen the impacts experienced by the region nor will it reduce the economic hardship that the islands will face.
Along with the warming of temperatures, changes being observed across the globe include weather and precipitation pattern modifications, increase in storm intensities, more frequent droughts and torrential downpours, changes in growing seasons, expansion of ranges of plants, insects, animals and diseases, warming of oceans and seas, melting of snow caps and glaciers, rising ocean levels and many more changes.
While global temperatures are cyclical in nature, it is accepted by many that human activities are contributing to the changes currently being observed.

Given that climate change is such an important issue, especially for small island states, every effort should be made to make development as sustainable as possible to further reduce contributions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.
Each and every project planned, constructed, implemented at any point going forward should make climate change and sustainability a top priority.

Sustainable building techniques should be practiced; renewable energy utilized as much as possible and energy and water conservation devices/fixtures and practices implemented.
A decision must be made early on to develop a sustainable project as it is more cost effective to include the required elements in the development stage rather than during a retrofit/renovation.

Site Stabilization and Erosion Control Given the topography, volcanic nature, soils and climate of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, special attention is needed in the area of site stabilization and erosion control.
These elements Page 85 of 106 should be addressed during the project design and planning stages and plans included with other site plans.

In an effort to protect natural resources, life, property and infrastructure and given the topography and soils present in St. Vincent, site stabilization and erosion control measures may be necessary during project implementation.

Clearing and site disturbance should be limited only that which is necessary and soils should not be left open to rainfall.
Specific attention should be paid to installing erosion control measures on the downslope side of the project site or disturbance area and in proximity to natural drainage features and waterways.

An erosion control plan should be included with a proposed landscape plan and other site plans.

Best management practices for site slope stabilization and erosion control are presented in Appendix 5 and 6, below.
Other Issues to be considered in the EIS: • Site Security • Discovery of antiquities • Asbestos • Worker Sanitation • Noise Control • Use and management of hazardous materials • Use of preservatives and paint substances • Schools • Agency Responsibility Page 86 of 106 Appendix 5 – Best Management Practices for Erosion Control Mitigation Measures Limit the area of disturbance/clearing, the development footprint and preserve natural drainage patterns and vegetation as much as is feasible.
Ensure that exposed areas are protected in an effort to limit exposure of bare soil to rain and wind during construction.

Immediately after earth moving activities are completed, all exposed areas should be covered with a combination of grass, trees and shrubs to form a permanent protection against erosion.

Grass could be established either with sodding or seeding using grass species that are native to the area.
Mulching should be used as needed around tree roots to improve the supply of moisture and oxygen to the roots.

Wood mulch can be used to spread over the disturbed area as a temporary measure until permanent vegetation can be established.

On very steep slopes erosion occurs more easily and any mulching and seeding laid down may be washed away before the new grass or vegetation are properly established.

In these situations, a special matting material to provide a cover for the exposed soil is recommended.
The matting, available in rolls, can be laid down over the exposed area and secured into the ground with pegs.

The matting allows grass to grow through while preventing the soil from moving as the runoff travels across the land surface.

Install perimeter protection along natural flow areas to prevent sediment from travelling off-site during construction.

These include silt fencing, haybales or other erosion control methods.

See illustrations below.


During construction trucks and equipment entering and leaving the project site tend to track debris and dirt onto roadways.

Efforts should be made to limit the material that is carried onto roadways.

Install rumple strip so that debris/dirt can be shaken off before exiting the site.

For site design and planning do not channel storm water runoff offsite to adjacent properties, drainage features, roadways, waterways or similar.
Retain as much of the runoff generated by impervious surfaces onsite as possible and direct to onsite rainwater collection system or drainage features such as swales, drainage ponds, dry wells, rain gardens, etc.

Eliminate or limit the use of chemicals including pesticides, fertilizers, as they will likely contaminate surface water flows originating on-site.

A depiction of a dry well is included below.


The National Institute of Building Sciences recommends the following: • Keep land disturbance to a minimum and retain prime vegetation features to the extent possible.

• Reduce building and paving footprints.

• Limit site disturbance to a minimal area around the building perimeter, including locating building adjacent to existing infrastructure.
• Plan construction staging areas with the environment in mind Page 87 of 106 • Using alternative paving materials like grass and permeable pavers will reduce runoff generation and increase infiltration.

Several rainwater collection/storage/treatment features are illustrated below.
Figure 2 Cross Section of Retention Cell/Rain Garden http://www.ence.umd.edu/~apdavis/bio- Figure 1 A Grassed Swale http://www.pbcgov.com/coextension/horticultur e/ neighborhoods/tips/_images/swale.jpg Page 88 of 106 Figure 3 Cross-section of a Typical Infiltration Trench Source:http://www.anr.state.vt.us/dec//waterq/stormwater /htm/sw_InfiltrationTrenches.htm Appendix 6 – Best Management Practices for Slope Stabilization In an effort to protect natural resources, life, property and infrastructure Slope Stabilization measures may be necessary for areas prone to slope failure which includes land, rock and debris slides.
Several factors can contribute to land movement.

These include rainfall, slope gradient, earthquakes, erosion and, of course, gravity.

In some cases, rock and landslide can be triggered by clearing and disturbing areas for roads, structures and other development.

In determining the best methods for Slope Stabilization, being able to assess existing conditions, slope gradient, hydrology and drainage characteristics, soil, surface or sediment deposits and underlying rock formations will be important.
Rock-fall-Prevention Methods Rock-falls can be triggered by rainfall, natural and manmade undercutting, earthquakes and vibrations.

Most slope failures in St. Vincent are as a consequence of heavy rainfall.

It should be noted that human activities like clearing of land for roads and structures, undercutting of slopes and improper excavating can contribute to slope failures.

It is also important to note that leaking water mains, pipes and septic systems can also play a role in slope failures.
The USGS (2008, 53) notes that rock-falls can be mitigated through the use of “catch ditches, benches, scaling and trimming, cable and mesh, shotcrete, anchors, bolts, dowels, and controlled blasting.” Catch Ditches The USGS (2008, 100) notes that “[w]ide catch ditches are effective in containing rock-fall, but the ditches must be designed with the cliff geometry taken into account, and it is best to consult a professional about specifications.
The bottom of the catchment ditch should be covered with loose earth to prevent falling rock from bouncing or shattering into pieces or shards.
If there is not enough space to construct as wide a ditch as is specified, then a combination of smaller ditches with a gabion or rock wall along their downhill edges can be used.” Illustration of a Catch Ditch Source: http://www.besafenet.org/main/data/fall_34.jpg Page 89 of 106 Cable, Mesh, Fencing, and Rock Curtains The USGS (2008, 100) outlines how “[c]able lashing and wire nets are simple, low-cost methods for protecting a road or path from rock-fall.
For large, unstable blocks, strands of metal cable are wrapped around the blocks and anchored to the slope.

Where the rock is too fractured to be restrained by individual cables, cable nets are used.

Wire mesh (closely spaced interwoven wires) can be used to prevent smaller rocks, less than 0.75 meter (2.4 feet) in size, from falling.

The standard mesh is double-twisted gabion wire mesh or a heavy gage metal chain link.
The mesh is either loosely draped over a uniform rock face or bolted or otherwise firmly secured where the cliff face is irregular and the mesh cannot make close contact with the rock.

Bolting the mesh to the rock face can prevent rock from becoming dislodged and provides overall stability of the slope or rock face.” It is also noted that “[c]atch nets made of cable and wire mesh can be constructed to catch falling rock at the bottom of gullies and slopes.
When suspended from an anchored cable, the mesh forms a flexible barrier to dissipate the energy of the falling rock and will usually stop boulders up to 1 m in diameter, if properly secured.
Additionally, catch nets can be used in conjunction with roadside catch ditches.” Installed Rock Barrier Fence and Rock Curtain Source: http://www.besafenet.org/main/default.aspx?it=1&tabid=49&itemid=1227 Page 90 of 106 Installed Rock Barrier Fencing Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1325/pdf/C1325_508.pdf It should be noted that proper engineering studies by qualified engineers should be involved in the installation of fences and supporting posts as they will need to be able to withstand the force of falling rocks and debris.
Retaining Walls Retaining walls are commonly used to help stabilize slopes and to prevent road blockages and other infrastructure damage.

They work by increasing the resistance to slope movements.

Proper engineering and installation is pivotal to ensure that the wall functions as intended and does not complicate matters.

Retaining walls can be made out of steel, concrete, timbers, or other materials and must be anchored properly so as not to tip over during rock-fall.
Excavation and Benches Several methods of controlling rock slides involve mechanical manipulation of the slope and rocks.

Benching creates steps in the rock onto which rocks can fall and remain as illustrated below.

The USGS (2008, 104) notes that horizontal benches excavated into a rock face are among the most effective kinds of protection from rock-fall.

In addition to intercepting rock-fall, benches reduce tensional forces in the surface rock and reduce surface erosion rates.
They caution, however, that benches have little or no effect on potential deep-seated rock failure.

Vertical bench-face angles should be avoided, however, as tension cracks, dangerous overhangs, and excessive rock-fall can result.

The placing of bench faces should be stopped at the base of weaker rock layers, fractured rock zones, or water-bearing zones.

A minimum width of 4 m is recommended for the benches, and all benches should have drainage ditches to divert water away from the slope.
Page 91 of 106 Illustration of Benches Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1325/pdf/C1325_508.pdf Page 92 of 106 Appendix 7 – Other Best Management Practices Management of construction waste Every effort should be made to prevent sediment, fill, debris, and pollutants from traveling off site during construction by utilizing sediment barriers and sound construction practices.
It is recommended that silt fencing be installed along the downslope side of the limits of clearing to minimize/prevent sediment from washing offsite to streams, drains, adjacent streets and properties.

Cover exposed area with mulch or hay to prevent erosion during rain events or seed areas that will be exposed for long periods with temporary grass.

Silt fencing and/or anchored tarps are recommended to prevent the travel of materials from the designed stockpile areas.
The site contractor should be responsible for ensuring that storage and stockpiling of construction materials and supplies will be in designated areas and erosion control measures are implemented to prevent/reduce wind-blown dust and erosion from rainwater.

Stored materials may include machinery for construction activities; fill material, stockpiled soil, and building materials as necessary.

A covered dumpster is recommended for waste materials.
It should be the responsibility of the site contractor to ensure the equipment and materials stored onsite are protected as necessary to prevent accidental spills of hazardous materials/substances.

Pest Management Pest management in the tropical is an important issue.

Chemicals used to control pests indoors and outdoors can be potentially dangerous to applicators, the general public and waterways, etc..
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a concept of pest management that seeks to reduce the use of harmful chemicals, target specific pests, increase the use of safer alternatives and techniques and limit exposure of applicators, humans and other organisms to harmful substances.

It is a proactive approach with the premise that if the food and habitat are not provided for the pests, they will go elsewhere.
Chemicals are applied as a last resort and the least hazardous chemical is applied in the lowest possible concentration by trained professional.

The following IPM principles and practices should be implemented/practiced: • Design, construct, and maintain buildings to be as pest resistant as possible.
• Ensure that roof parapets and caps are sealed, any other devices on roofs, such as traps or bait stations, are placed at documented locations and regularly checked, and nets for bird/pigeon activity are checked on a regular basis.

• Eliminate cracks and holes to keep pests out.

Lightly dust gaps between walls • and other voids with boric acid before closing them up.

Inspect the grounds around buildings and fill burrows with gravel.

Keep vegetation at least 12 inches from building perimeter.
• Ensure that devices such as bait stations placed in outside areas are locked, secured, clean, and in good working order.

Rodents do not like dusty and unclean bait stations.

• Use physical barriers to block pest entry and movement (such as door sweeps, screens at air intakes, doors, and windows).
Page 93 of 106 Appendix 8 – Typical Environmental Contract Clauses The following are standard environmental related clauses that may be appended to or incorporated into the contracts for the small civil works which have been determined to be of minimal environmental impact.

These mitigation measures are the core of a generic, standardized EMP (Environmental Management Plan) for these types of small works and the typical associated minor impacts which can be routinely addressed with best industry practice.
These clauses are general and may be modified to conform to applicable Saint Vincent and the Grenadines laws and contract procedures for such works and shall remain in force throughout the contract period.

These mitigation measures are intended for relatively simple environmental management issues and are based on best management practice and industry standards.
These are the mitigation measures which are expected of all professional contractors who are performing civil works, and represent the minimum standard of execution for environmental protection during the execution of such works.

(Specific project related recommendations may also be forthcoming from statutory permitting agencies such as the PPDB or the Ministry of Health, and these can be reformatted in to contract clauses as well.
Finally, if an EIA has been conducted for a particular sub-project due to its environmentally sensitive or complex nature, then the specific recommendations for mitigation measures in that EIA should also be included as contract clauses.)

1.

Permits and Approvals The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that he or she has all relevant legal approvals and permits required to commence works.

2.
2.

Site Security The contractor shall be responsible for maintaining security over the construction site including the protection of stored materials and equipment.

In the event of severe weather, the contractor shall secure the construction site and associated equipment in such a manner as to protect the site and adjacent areas from consequential damages.
This includes the management of onsite, construction materials, construction and sanitary wastes, additional strengthening of erosion control and soil stabilization systems and other conditions resulting from contractor activities which may increase the potential for damages.

3.
3.

Discovery of Antiquities If, during the execution of the activities contained in this contract, any material is discovered onsite which may be considered of historical or cultural interest, such as evidence of prior settlements, native or historical activities, evidence of any existence on a site which may be of cultural significance, all work shall stop and the supervising contracting officer shall be notified immediately.
The area in which the material was discovered shall be secured, cordoned off, marked, and the evidence preserved for examination by the local archaeological or cultural authority.

No item believed to be an artifact must be removed or disturbed by any of the workers.

Work may resume, without penalty of prejudice to the contractor upon permission from the contracting officer with any restrictions offered to protect the site.

Page 94 of 106 4.
Page 94 of 106 4.

Worker Occupational Health and Safety The contractor shall ensure that all workers operate within a safe environment.

Sanitation facilities shall be provided for all site workers.

All sanitary wastes generated as a result of project activities shall be managed in a manner approved by the contracting officer and the local authority responsible for public health.
The contractor shall ensure that there are basic medical facilities on site and that there are staff trained in basic first aid.

Workers must be provided with the necessary protective gear as per their specific tasks such as hard hats, overalls, gloves, goggles, boots, etc.

The contractor shall provide the contracting officer with an occupational health and safety plan for approval by the local health authority prior to the commencement of site activities.
The contractor must ensure that all workers operate within a safe environment.

All relevant Labour and Occupational Health and Safety regulations must be adhered to ensure worker safety.

Sanitary facilities must be provided for all workers on site.

Appropriate posting of information within the site must be done to inform workers of key rules and regulations to follow.

5.

Noise Control The contractor shall control noise emissions generated as a result of contracting activities to the extent possible.
In the case of site locations where noise disturbance will be a concern, the contractor shall ensure that the equipment is in good working order with manufacturer supplied noise suppression (mufflers etc.)

systems functioning and in good repair.

Where noise management is a concern, the contractor shall make reasonable efforts to schedule activities during normal working hours (between 8 am and 5 pm).
Where noise is likely to pose a risk to the surrounding community either by normal works or working outside of normal working hours or on weekends, the contractor shall inform the contracting officer and shall develop a public notification and noise management plan for approval by the contracting officer.

Specific elements of the noise control activities by the contractor shall include: construction/ work activities will occur within specified daylight hours e.g.
8:00 am to 4:00pm; community / public to be informed in advance of any work activities to occur outside of normal working hours or on weekends; sites should be hoarded wherever possible; during operations, the engine covers of generators, air compressors and other powered mechanical equipment shall be closed, and equipment placed as far away from residential areas as possible; there will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites; noise suppression equipment or systems supplied by manufacture will be utilized; ensure all vehicles and equipment are properly serviced; the contractor must develop and implement a public notification and noise management plan.
6.

Use and Management of Hazardous Materials, fuels, solvents and petroleum products The use of any hazardous materials including pesticides, oils, fuels and petroleum products shall conform to the proper use recommendations of the product.

Waste hazardous materials and their containers shall be disposed of in a manner approved by the contracting officer.
A site Page 95 of 106 management plan will be developed by the contractor if the operation involves the use of these materials to include estimated quantities to be consumed in the process, storage plans, spill control plans, and waste disposal practices to be followed.

This plan and the manner of management are subject to the approval of local authority responsible for safety, and waste management, and the contracting officer.
Elements of the hazardous materials management shall include: contractor must provide temporary storage on site of all hazardous or toxic substances in safe containers labeled with details of composition, properties and handling information; the containers of hazardous substances shall be placed in an leak-proof container to prevent spillage and leaching; the wastes shall be transported by specially licensed carriers and disposed in a licensed facility; paints with toxic ingredients or solvents or lead-based paints will not be used; banned chemicals will not be used on any project.
7.

Use and Management of Pesticides Any use of pesticides shall be approved by the contracting officer and shall conform to the manufacturers’ recommendations for use and application.

Any person using pesticides shall demonstrate that they have read and understood these requirements and are capable of complying with the usage recommendations to the satisfaction of the contracting officer.
All pesticides to be used shall conform to the list of acceptable pesticides that are not banned by the relevant local authority.

If termite treatment is to be utilized, ensure appropriate chemical management measures are implemented to prevent contamination of surrounding areas, and use only licensed and registered pest control professionals with training and knowledge of proper application methods and techniques.

8.
8.

Use of Preservatives and Paint Substances All paints and preservatives shall only be used with the approval of the contracting officer.

Information shall be provided to the contracting officer who describes the essential components of the materials to be used so that an informed determination can be made as to the potential for environmental effects and suitability can be made.
Storage, use, and disposal of excess paints and preservatives shall be managed in conformance with the manufacturers’ recommendations and as approved by the contracting officer.

The contractor shall provide the contracting officer with a list of materials and estimated quantities to be used, storage, spill control and waste disposal plans to be observed during the execution of the contract.

This plan is subject to the approval of the contracting officer.

9.
9.

Use of Explosives Use of explosives shall be at the approval of the relevant local authority and shall be supervised and undertaken by a qualified explosives technician.

Blasting will be limited to between the hours of 9:00am and 4:00 pm unless specifically approved by the local authority and the Page 96 of 106 contracting officer.
Any use of explosives shall be permitted only after an explosives management and blasting plan has been approved by the relevant local authority and the contracting officer.

This plan shall include: A.

Description of the explosive agent, charge description, intended use.

B.

Site safety plan including: 1.

Storage of initiators, booster charges and principal blasting agents 2.

Handling precautions to be observed 3.

Transport to and from site 4.

Security of stored materials 5.


Disposal of excess or damaged explosive materials.

C. Analysis of risk to surrounding area and mitigation measures to be employed including: 1.

Over-pressure event 2.

Noise 3.

Flying debris 4.

Seismic transmission 5.

Accidental detonation D. Name and qualifications for all persons responsible for handling explosive agents 10.
Site Stabilization and Erosion Control The Contractor shall implement measures at the site of operations to manage soil erosion through minimization of excavated area and time of exposure of excavated areas, preservation of existing ground cover to the extent possible, provision of approved ground cover.

Where excavations are made, contractor shall implement appropriate stabilizing techniques to prevent cave-in or landslide.

Measures shall be approved by the contracting officer.
The contractor must ensure that appropriate erosion control measures such as silt fences are installed.

Proper site drainage must be implemented.

Any drain clogged by construction material or sediment must be unclogged as soon as possible to prevent overflow and flooding.

The use of retaining structures and planting with deep rooted grasses to retain soil during and after works must be considered.

The use of bio-engineering methods must be considered as a measure to reduce erosion and land slippage.
Keep angle of slopes within limits of soil type.

Balance cut and fill to limit steepness of slopes.

All slopes and excavated areas must be monitored for movement.

All construction materials, including chemicals, must be properly stored.
The contractor will establish appropriate erosion and sediment control measures such as hay bales, sedimentation basins, and / or silt fences and traps to prevent sediment from moving off site and causing excessive turbidity in nearby streams, rivers, wetlands, and coastal waters.

Page 97 of 106 An erosion management plan will be required where the potential exists for significant sediment quantities to accumulate in wetlands, lakes, rivers and nearshore marine systems.
This plan shall include a description of the potential threat, mitigation measures to be applied, and consideration for the effects of severe weather and an emergency response plan.

If works are along coastal marine areas or near major steams and river, water quality monitoring must be done before construction, and at regular intervals to determine turbidity levels and other quality parameters.
Construction vehicles and machinery will be washed only in designated areas where runoff will not pollute natural surface water bodies.

11.

Air Quality The following conditions apply to work sites for the control of air quality including dust control: • Construction materials such as sand, cement, or other fines should be kept properly covered.

• Cement should be kept stored within a shed or container.

• The sand and fines can be moistened with sprays of water.
• Unpaved, dusty construction roads should compacted and then wet periodically.

• During interior demolition debris-chutes shall be used above the first floor.

• Demolition debris shall be kept in controlled area and sprayed with water mist to reduce debris dust.

• During pneumatic drilling/wall destruction dust shall be suppressed by ongoing water spraying and/or installing dust screen enclosures at site • The surrounding environment (sidewalks, roads) shall be kept free of debris to minimize dust.
• There will be no open burning of construction / waste material at the site.

• There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites.

• The bins of all haulage vehicles transporting aggregate or building materials must be covered on all public roads.

12.
12.

Traffic Management In the event that construction activities should result in the disruption of area transportation services, including temporary loss of roadways, blockages due to deliveries and site related activities, the contractor shall provide the contracting officer with a traffic management plan including a description of the anticipated service disruptions, community information plan, and traffic control strategy to be implemented so as to minimize the impact to the surrounding community.
This plan shall consider time of day for planned disruptions, and shall include consideration for alternative access routes, access to essential services such as medical, disaster evacuation, and other critical services.

The plan shall be approved by relevant local authority and the contracting officer.
Elements of the traffic management plan to be developed and implemented by contractor shall include: alternative routes to be identified in the instance of extended road works or road blockages; the public to be notified of all disturbance to their normal routes; signposting, Page 98 of 106 warning signs, barriers and traffic diversions must be clearly visible and the public warned of all potential hazards; provision must be made for the safe passages and crossings for all pedestrians where construction traffic interferes with their normal route; there must be active traffic management by trained and visible staff at the site or along roadways as required to ensure safe and convenient passage for the vehicular and pedestrian public; Adjustment of working hours to local traffic patterns, e.g.
avoiding major transport activities during rush hours or times of livestock movement .

13.

Management of Standing Water Under no circumstances shall the contractor permit the collection of standing water as a consequence of contractor activities without the approval of the contracting officer and consultation with the relevant local environmental health authority.

Recommendations from that local authority on how to manage and treat the standing water must be implemented.
The condition of the standing water must be monitored by the contractor to ensure that it does not present itself as a breeding ground for any pests such as mosquitoes.

14.

Management of Solid Wastes -trash and construction debris The contractor shall provide the contracting officer with a solid waste management plan as part of a site waste management plan that conforms to the solid waste management policies and regulations of the relevant Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authority.
Under no circumstances shall the contractor allow construction wastes to accumulate so as to cause a nuisance or health risk due to the propagation of pests and disease vectors.

The site waste management plan shall include a description of how wastes will be stored, collected and disposed of in accordance with current law.

Additionally the contractor shall provide for the regular removal and disposal of all site wastes and provide the contracting officer with a schedule for such removal.

15.
15.

Management of Liquid Wastes The contractor shall provide the contracting officer with a liquid waste management plan as part of a site waste management plan that conforms to the waste management policies and regulations of the relevant Saint Vincent and the Grenadines authority.
Under no circumstances shall the contractor allow construction related liquid wastes to accumulate on or off the site, or to flow over or from the site in an uncontrolled manner or to cause a nuisance or health risk due to its content.

The site waste management plan shall include a description of how these wastes will be stored, collected and disposed of in accordance with current law.
Additionally the contractor shall provide for the regular removal and disposal of all site wastes and provide the contracting officer with a schedule for such removal.
Specific elements of the contractor’s liquid waste management plan shall include: contractor to abide by all pertinent waste management and public health laws; waste collection and disposal pathways and sites will be identified for all major waste types expected from demolition and construction activities; construction and demolition wastes will be stored in appropriate bins; liquid and chemical wastes will be stored in appropriate containers separated from the general refuse; all waste will be collected and disposed of properly in approved landfills by licensed Page 99 of 106 collectors; the records of waste disposal will be maintained as proof for proper management as designed; whenever feasible the contractor will reuse and recycle appropriate and viable materials (except asbestos); construction related liquid wastes must not be allowed to accumulate on or off the site, or to flow over or from the site in an uncontrolled manner or to cause a nuisance or health risk due to its contents.
16.

Special Condition - Management of Medical Wastes In the event that the contractor discovers medical wastes, the contractor shall provide the contracting officer with a medical waste management plan as part of a site waste management plan that conforms to the waste management policies and regulations of the relevant Saint Vincent and the Grenadines health and waste management authorities.
The plan shall include a description of how these wastes will be stored, collected and disposed of in accordance with current law.

The contractor must ensure that all persons handling medical wastes are provided with proper protective clothing.

All medical wastes must be secured in specially labelled and sealed containers, and disposed of according to relevant local legislation at specified disposal sites.

Medical wastes must be kept separate from the other waste streams on site.
The waste management plan provided by the contractor must ensure that all persons handling medical wastes are provided with proper protective clothing.

All medical wastes must be treated as hazardous.

All medical wastes must be secured in specially labeled and sealed containers separate from other wastes streams.

All medical wastes must be disposed of according to relevant local legislation at specified disposal sites.

17.
17.

Special Condition - Management of Asbestos In the event that during the course of work activities the contractor discovers asbestos as part of the existing site that requires stabilization and removal, the contractor shall contact the relevant local authorities and the contracting officer immediately.

If work has already commenced, all work in the area must stop immediately.
An asbestos management plan must be prepared by the contractor and approved by the relevant local health and waste management authorities and the contracting officer describing how this material will be stored, collected and disposed of in accordance with current law, and identifying the approved experienced professional who will undertake this work.
The plan must include: • Description of the issue and extent of contamination • Site safety measures • Stabilization techniques to be employed • Storage and transport plan • Approved disposal procedure • Worker awareness and training In preparing the plan, the contractor should liaise with the relevant local health and waste management agencies to ensure that the adequacy of the measurements being proposed.
Page 100 of 106 Site management shall consist of enclosing relevant sections of the site with appropriate material by the contractor.

Where possible the asbestos and its location must be appropriately contained and sealed to minimize exposure, and any asbestos shall be marked clearly as a hazardous material.

Stabilizing friable asbestos will be done prior to removal (if removal is necessary) and it will be treated with a wetting agent to minimize asbestos dust.
Asbestos will be handled and disposed by skilled & experienced professionals using appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) such as respirators and tyvec suites which will be provisioned to workers to protect them and prevent contamination with asbestos fibres.

Respiratory protection together with measures to prevent the contamination of clothing and inadvertent transport of asbestos fiber off- site shall be provided to all exposed workers.
If asbestos material is to be stored temporarily, the wastes should be securely enclosed inside closed containments and marked appropriately.

Security measures must be implemented against unauthorized removal of asbestos from the site.

No removed asbestos will be reused.

18.


Special conditions - Water Pipeline Installation The Contractor shall utilize the following measures to mitigate potential environmental, health and safety impacts during the construction and installation of the water pipeline: • Trenching.

Soil stockpiling will be done in designated areas alongside the trench using piles no higher than 2 meters, convex in shape, and located so as to minimize disturbance and hazard to passers-by or traffic.
The contractor shall ensure that stockpiles do not cause damming of water or runoff, or that such stockpiles are themselves not washed away.

• Dewatering.

Removal of water from trenches shall be done in such a manner to prevent the discharge of mud or sediment into any water body, or the creation of standing water bodies on lands outside the work area.

• Dust Control.

During dry periods when dust is a nuisance it shall be mitigated by spraying of water onto work surfaces along the pipeline work area.
Dust shall not be allowed to travel outside of the work zone.

• Traffic Control.

For all works alongside roadways, appropriate safety signage and barriers shall be used to ensure the safety of any foot traffic or vehicular traffic.

If the trench is exposed to foot or vehicle traffic appropriate restrictive barriers, taping, and warning signage shall be used.

Traffic shall be controlled and stopped as necessary on public thoroughfares in accordance with good safety practice and national requirements.
Trenches or equipment exposed to public access must be clearly demarcated and restricted to public access.

Mud and sand brought onto paved public access roads shall be washed and cleared daily.

• Safety Plan.

The Contactor will prepare a Health and Safety Plan which shall include emergency response and first aid procedures, awareness training suitable to the tasks being conducted, vehicle and equipment safety provisions, and personal protective equipment information.
The contractor will provide hard hats, work boots, protective eyewear and gloves to workers and will ensure that they are used by workers on the job.

Page 101 of 106 • Vegetation and Topsoil Clearing.

If any vegetation or brush is cleared, or topsoil removed, it shall be done in such a way as to avoid disturbance or effects outside the established work area.
Herbicides or burning may not be used to dispose of any cleared vegetation, rather such vegetation must be chipped, shredded, and dispersed in approved areas or hauled to an approved landfill.

Should fauna be encountered work will cease until such fauna have been safely relocated.

If any agricultural land is crossed, topsoil shall be stored separately and replaced by spreading on the land surface upon completion of work.

• Access Roads.
• Access Roads.

No new access roads will be opened, only existing roadways will be used for all the entry and exit of materials and equipment to and from the work zone.

• Work Areas.

Contractor will delineate approved work areas for all activities including excavation, stockpiling, access, equipment placement during excavation, and materials storage.
Such work areas are subject to approval by the contract manager and/or supervising engineer, and Contractor may use only those lands for which approval and access has been provided by the contracting officer and/or supervising engineer.

Any rental, use or acquisition of lands from private parties is not permitted without previous notification to and express written approval by the PSIMPU through application of relevant World Bank Policy.

• Vehicle and Equipment Fuelling and Maintenance.


All gasoline and diesel filling, oil changing, and maintenance of vehicles and equipment will be done outside of the project area at established facilities.

If fuel trucks are used they will have adequate safety equipment and fire extinguishers, be free of leaks and be fitted with appropriate dispensers, and have spill kits and absorbent materials ready to retrieve any leaked or spilled fuels.
No fuel, new oil or waste oil will be stored on the work site, and vehicles will not be washed on the work site or in adjacent areas.

19.

Special conditions – works in Forest Reserves For any work in a designated Forest Reserve, the following will apply: • There must be no unnecessary clearing of natural vegetation.

• Avoid the use of herbicides or other chemicals.

• Any works to be undertaken in a protected forest area must be done under the supervision of a representative of the Forestry Department.
• The contractor must ensure that any work undertaken in the forest reserve must be done by manual means.

• There must be minimal impact to flora and fauna in the forest area.

• All recognized natural habitats, wetlands and protected areas in the immediate vicinity of the activity must not be damaged or exploited.

• The contractor must ensure that all staff will be strictly prohibited from hunting, foraging, logging or other damaging activities.
Page 102 of 106 • A survey and an inventory shall be made of large trees in the vicinity of the construction activity, large trees shall be marked and cordoned off with fencing, their root system protected, and any damage to the trees avoided.

• There will be no unlicensed borrow pits, quarries or waste dumps in protected areas.

• Upon completion, all wastes must be immediately removed out of the forested area.
Page 103 of 106 Appendix 9 – Disclosure Workshop / Public Consultation List of Participants Attending the Multi-stakeholder Consultation Names Agency Jennifer Cruickshank-Howard Fisheries Division Janeel Miller-Findlay Environmental Management Department Marcelle Edwards –John Central Planning Claudette Alexander Abena White Anthony Bowman Richard MacLeish Cecil Harris Patrick Rodrigues National Security National Parks Ministry of Housing Central Planning Central Planning Central Planning Fitzgerald Providence Forestry Department Key input, concerns, observations The participants felt that the draft EMF was a good start to a document that can become a national tool.
There were some concerns about the amount of narrative.

Persons would like to see more checklist and tables with guidelines and beat practices.

There were some concerns regarding guidelines for and assistance to consultants/contractors in terms of environmental expectations, regulations and national goals.

Participants felt that there should be some way of helping consultants/contractors address cultural and traditional issues and attitudes.
It was felt that the EMF should address economic issues as a mitigation measure.

There was a request for information on flooding given the events of the last three years.

In responding to these concerns some best practices for EIA are included in Appendix 4 with the expectation that the information will be appended to the contract clause.

Major conclusions, results There is a call for a modified (more condensed, instructive) EMF for regular use by planners, regulating agencies and developers.
The EMF was finalized based on inputs from the national Page 104 of 106 workshop and comments on the draft by the World Bank.

The inputs from the colleagues at the Bank were very instructive in giving shape to this final product.

Unfortunately, the contract arrangement and time frame did not allow for the consultant to address all of the suggestions and recommendations from the Bank.

The suggestions not addressed relates to inclusion of additional information addressing the December floods.
Page 105 of 106 Appendix 10 – Redisclosure The European Union through its 11th European Development Fund is supporting the efforts of St Vincent and the Grenadines in the wake of the severe infrastructure damage suffered from a storm event on December 24th and 25th 2013.

The European Union is integrating its support into the existing Regional Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project through a trust fund with the World Bank.
This aid assistance has allowed for the expansion of the scope of work to be included in the sub project portfolio covered by this EMF.
This increased scope is listed as follows: • Ginger Village Road Rehabilitation and Slope Stabilisation • Congo Valley Road and bridge rehabilitation • Longline bridge and road rehabilitation • Palmiste Road rehabilitation • Fireburn Road rehabilitation • Ferguson Mountain Road rehabilitation • Gaskill Road rehabilitation • Chateaubelair Jetty rehabilitation Project descriptions have been added to the EMF and projected impacts included in table 3b in Section 4.1.
The revised EMF will be circulated to workshop participants listed in Appendix 9 and hosted on the project’s home page on the government’s website, gov.vc.

Notice of the revised sub projects are to be advertised in the local newspapers.

Page 106 of 106