316usman/thematic2b huggingface dataset:
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632440997.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA By-Laws (Printing of False Copies) (CAP.

66 1 CHAPTER 66 THE BY-LAWS (PRINTING OF FALSE COPIES) ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Penalty for printing false copies.

BY-LAWS (PRINTING O F FALSE COPIES) (25th February, 192 1 .)

1311921.

S.R.O.

2211956.

1.

This Act may be cited as the By-Laws (Printing S h o ~ of False Copies) Act.

2.
2.

Any person who- (a) prints any paper which falsely purports to be a copy of a By-law, or, (b) tenders in evidence any such paper falsely pur- porting to be a copy of a By-law knowing the same to be false shall be guilty of felony and on conviction shall be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years with or without hard labour.

Penalty for printing false
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632460070.pdf (Antigua and Barbuda)
LAWS OF ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Gazette (Authorization) (CAP.

187 1 CHAPTER 187 T H E GAZETTE (AUTHORIZATION) ACT Arrangement of Sections Section 1.

Short title.

2.

Name of printer to be affixed.

3 .

Penalty for printing false copies.

GAZETTE (AUTHORIZATION) (20th April, 1915.)

411915.

S.R.O.

2211956.

1.

This Act may be cited as the Gazette (Authoriza- short title.

tion) Act.

2.
tion) Act.

2.

All printed copies of the Gazette shall have imprinted :;pee ;ii,pfF at the end the name of the printer who printed the same with the words "by authority" added thereafter.

3.

Any person who- Penalty for printing false (a) prints any paper which falsely purports to be "pies.
a duly authorized copy of the Gazette, or ( 6 ) tenders in evidence any such paper falsely pur- porting to be the Gazette, knowing that the same was not duly printed and published, shall be guilty of felony and on conviction be liable to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding two years with or without hard labour.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632464819.pdf (Australia)
I am totally against the human rights and anti-discrimination bill proposed by Nicola Roxon.
Australians have continually had their right to free speech whittled away over the last 30 years and it is now getting that bad that our forefathers would no longer recognise this country as Australia, there has already been too much damage done to the rights of ordinary Australians by well meaning government laws, to criticise where criticism is needed or a slip of the tongue would be at the risk of a severe fine or gaol.
THERE WAS ONCE AN OLD SAYING THAT SEEMS TO BE FORGOTTEN NOWADAYS: “STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAL MY BONES BUT NAMES CAN NEVER HURT ME!” Mary Allison,
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632474080.pdf (Australia)
National Anti-Corruption Commission Bills 2022Submission 38 - Supplementary Submission National Anti-Corruption Commission Bills 2022Submission 38 - Supplementary Submission
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632491193.pdf (Australia)
Dear Secretariat I understand that the submissions have closed for the above inquiry .

How ever, I w anted to bring our submission to Senate Select Committee inquiry into Australia into a Financial and Technology Centre to this committee's attention insofar as it relates to the AML/CTF regime: https://www.aph .gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=6181bfdd-2b0d-49e5-ab68- 4f141f8a04f4&subld=711361 (see recommendation 10, page 19 of 20).
W e have no further comments to add to this but if the committee have any questions, please let me know .

Best, AML Or AARON M. LANE Lecturer in Law Coordinator, Business Law Group I Graduate School of Business and Law Research Fellow I RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub RM IT University SSRN I Google Scholar I Linkedln I RMIT The adequacy and efficacy of Australia’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regimeSubmission 46
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632611901.pdf (Australia)
The economic and social impact of legislation, policies or Commonwealth guidelines, with particular reference to: C :the sale and use of marijuana and associated products, including any impact on the health, enjoyment and finances of users and non-users; I would like to submit my own experience in regard to use of Cannabis and the availability of it and why it should be sold legally.
I am a chronic pain sufferer I am missing a disc in my back so my vertabrae are grinding and pinching making everyday a living hell for pain.

I have personally tried working through the standard channels of finding help and alleviation for my pain.
These channels started on things like prescriptions for Anti-depressants to much more addicitive substances such as Oxy-contin, the Oxy-contin left me addcited and very intoxicated most days, then I was told you can’t have these any longer , but we are glad to put you back on a number of Anti-depressants again and some anti- pshycotic drugs if you would like.

This was not acceptable since the quality of my life went down with each new medication I would try.
Also it created a huge instability for my wife and four children.

I read on the internet that Cannabis was good for pain and decided at the time to grow some of my own.

This took a short time and I eventually tried it .

I had more releif from Cannabis the very first time I tried it than all of my previous treatments, so naturally I would like to see it available for all users who require it.
The current situation of having to either grow it yourself and face a huge stigma and fines or jail time is terrible, and the alternative of going to see a “Dealer” is also terrible.
The idea of regulation sits well with me, because Cannabis taxes can be collected and help fund education and health in our community, and this would be better than wasting millions on law enforcement and incarceration cost chasing people who are using a plant to help their health needs or even recreational desires, because it is a plant that does less damage to society than alcohol, which I’m sure you all use regularly.
Regulation would also help to dis empower unlawful bikie gangs and other un desirable elemnts of society who make a living off of selling this substance, legalsisation would grealty impact their income.

Also If law enforcement was free to concentrate their effort on the Ice epidemic this would mean they could because they aren’t trying to catch so called criminals like myself, a family man, who is just in pain.
Thankyou for your time and consideration of these opinions and testimony of my own personal experience of how Cannabis affects me, and how legalisation of Cannabis would affect my life for the positive.

Sincerly Andrew Toft.

Personal choice and community impactsSubmission 236
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632633159.pdf (Australia)
Inquiry into crystal methamphetamine (ice)Submission 119 Inquiry into crystal methamphetamine (ice)Submission 119 Inquiry into crystal methamphetamine (ice)Submission 119 high volume ROT enforcement is essential to impact the prevalence Sustaining illicit introduction imperative more efficient drug in their system.

of relevant to undertake technology relevant to provide research rate.
prosecution intervention The effectiveness of this enforcement quick succession with an of drivers from the would greatly road side evidential testing.

It is a that achieves and technology benefit to identify equipment the current to maintain Government The Victorian Police grow Automatic Number Highway Patrol drug test, strengthening offences·.

fleet.
fleet.

announced level of 100,000 in the Community roadside Safety Statement, funding for Victoria drug tests per year, and to maintain and Plate Recognition technology capabilities across new offences for refusing and introducing Victoria Police a roadside is also introducing drink driving The Government penalties for drug driving, for more interlocks the entire The Government children, methylamphetamine and is lowering such as speed or ice.
has introduced specific offences for drug dealers the threshold test for trafficking a commercial who endanger quantity of our school and Controlled Substances the laws against people who deal illicit made in 2016 to the Drugs, Poisons the production drugs such as ice to school children Amendments strengthen target new offences also deal with the possession other illicit drugs, intentionally allowing premises to force another 'grow' ice.

These laws to enforce of these offences.


house, and using violence provide person to deal an illicit substantial to be used as a clandestine or around school premises.

courts with the capacity for how to make ice and and distribution for those convicted drug lab or cannabis of instructions drugs in Victoria.
or publication New offences jail time or threats of illicit drug such as Act 1981 The New legislation for trafficking dealers trafficking, recommendation Drugs, Poisons exposing will see a lowering methylamphetamine, commercial of what constitutes one form of which is the drug ice.

This will enable more ice and large commercial quantities to be prosecuted and sentenced to revise the existing quantities for methylamphetamine for the more serious penalties and risk.
It follows offences of commercial-level a Court of Appeal trafficking set out in the them to more significant and Controlled Substances Act 1981.

THE HON MARTIN PAKULA MP Attorney-General 'THE HON LISA NEVILLE MP Minister for Police TRIM ID: CD/17/11133 Inquiry into crystal methamphetamine (ice)Submission 119
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632649277.pdf (Australia)
To whom it may concern, I would like to express a strongly concerned opinion over the new bill you are considering accepting.

How is it that the government want to keep the abuse thousands if not millions of animals suffering everyday a secret?!

Animal cruelty should not only be taken seriously, it should be punishable with stricter penalties and jail time.

There is nothing worse in this world than preying on a defenceless creature.
Whether it’s for enjoyment, to make a buck or to satisfy your sadistic tendencies, it’s wrong and the people educating the public should not be penalised whilst the criminal gets away scotch free.

Take a good look at yourselves and stop thinking about the money.

Regards, Casey Criminal Code Amendment (Animal Protection) Bill 2015Submission 20
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632659827.pdf (Australia)
RECOMMENATIONS FOR PARLIMENT OF AUSTRALIA.

(SENATE) Dear Senate Committee, We are an organisation that sees these sorts of wrongs on a daily basis.

After spending a lot of time with victims that have received such payment as these outlined in this enquiry.

Nearly all the victims are wanting the government to take only some of the reasonability but not all.

For past mistakes and the perpetrator to be fully accountable for their actions.

We are also finding the same to be with the (G2.)


Generation 2 of Forgotten and stolen generation.

Theses G2 I refer to have not as yet to take made claims of compensation as you may be aware that there are many more claims to come.

I go on to make the following recommendations as follows: ACCOUTABILTY I am requesting the following recommendations as stated.

I will require a detailed response to each matter in writing.

To RECOMMENATION 1.
To RECOMMENATION 1.

Statutes of limitations be changed or amended under the child protection act.

With no time limit.

This would only apply from the date this has been passed.

This in turn will hold the perpetrator accountable for their actions.

Thinking before acting.

Putting the right people in the job.

Relieving the system (State government.

)Of further litigations.

Freeing up funds.

RECOMMENATION 2.


Those that are found to be making false and miss leading allegation to be held accountable were by a fine or jail time is imposed.

This will free up funds making funds more available to be spent else were.

This will also free up time for cwo’s.

This will also weed out the time wasters or people that just want to be malice.

RECOMMENATION 3.

A program put in place for young people in the system.
This program will reflect or focus on future goals and what little happiness they have experienced.

RECOMMENATION 4.

Victims or passed yigss to take part in new recruits and tell their stories.

This will create a better understanding of these situations and can be more understood by the recruit for people that have not had these experiences.

They are able to learn from past mistakes.

This includes anyone who works in the department.

(Foster Parents, Group Home, Detention Centres e.c.t RECOMMENATION 5.
A day or week of recognition for yigss past and present.

Incorping the following matters: 1.

Recruitment of staff and carers (foster/temp e.c.t) 2.

Child abuse awareness.

3.

Child abuse is every body’s business.

4.

Encourage victims to come forward.

5.

Recognition for past mistakes.

RECOMMENATION 7.

Put in place a program of living skill.


This will include how to cook, do washing, shopping, budgeting and general day to day living skill that will be required for basic day to day living in the real world.

In turn this will make the transition to independent living smoother.
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632686344.pdf (Australia)
Thank you for seeing the need to ensure our children are safe whilst online.

I find it appallingly that social media platforms and those who provide online services and streaming seem to be exempt from regulation in many areas such as in providing age appropriate advertising, by hindering the law by not disclosing personal details of paedophiles, by allowing live paid cybersex viewing and rape of children and the list goes on!

Public advertising should be G rated!


Advertising such as pop up ads whilst online is public advertising in my opinion and that should be G rated Pornography is harmful.

Studies link pornography to violence, dysfunctional relationships, and to sexualising our children from an early age.

Pornography tries to normalise inappropriate sexual behaviour which confuses our children, making them more vulnerable to predators and to abusing other children by re-enactment.
Children should not be able to see porn whilst online and they should not be able to access porn.

By introducing age verification and tighter laws with huge fines/ jail time for those who breach regulatory laws, only then will our children be protected.

There is no other way.

Sincerely, Inquiry into age verification for online wagering and online pornographySubmission 214
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632687419.pdf (Australia)
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics Review of the four major banks (second report) Australian Bankers’ Association ABA16QW: Why doesn’t the ABA’s Whistleblower Principles include provision for compensation to whistleblowers who face retaliation?

Answer: The ABA’s Guiding Principles on Improving Protections for Whistleblowers1 prohibits actions that disadvantage the whistleblower personally or financially.
The industry supports the payment of compensation or other redress in circumstances where a whistleblower has been personally or financially disadvantaged.

Specifically, the Guiding Principles prohibit any actions “that disadvantage the whistleblower personally or financially in retaliation against their disclosure” (para 5.1).

All reasonable steps must be taken to protect whistleblowers from retaliation or adverse action related to the disclosure, including matters relating to their employment.
The remedy for reprisals or disadvantage may be compensation depending on the circumstances of the situation.

The ABA would expect that banks and other companies would fund their own compensation arrangements, and therefore we do not support the need for a broader and independent compensation fund.

The ABA does not support the provision of monetary incentives or financial rewards for whistleblowing.

We consider this would undermine the integrity and intent of whistleblowing policies and programs.
We note that the provision of incentives/rewards to encourage whistleblowing was recently rejected by the authorities in the United Kingdom.

1 http://www.betterbanking.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Final_Whistleblower_Guiding_Principles-Dec-2016.pdf bankers.asn.au 30 March 2017 | 1
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632693628.pdf (Australia)
samesex.marriage.sen@aph.gov.au Submission Regarding Definition of marriage Dear Select Committee, I am writing to make a submission regarding the Same Sex Marriage bill.

As a health professional who works with many CALD and diverse communities in Australian over 30 years, I have concerns about the definition but also the drafting of the terms of reference being exclusive.
It is understood “The committee will only accept submissions strictly addressing its terms of reference, with a particular focus on the following areas: (a) the proposed exemptions in the Exposure Draft for ministers of religion, marriage celebrants and religious bodies and organisations to refuse to conduct or solemnise marriages, and the extent to which those exemptions prevent encroachment upon religious freedoms; (b) The nature and effect of the proposed amendment to the Sex Discrimination Act 1984; (C) Whether there should be any consequential amendments to this bill.” This does not allow for normal Freedom of thought, speech and religion and other freedoms are basic human rights.
When people exercise their right to speak up, they are exercising a fundamental human right; this should not be worded as an “exemption” to anti-discrimination laws.

(1)This fundamental right applies not just ministers of religion.

As with any basic, human right, it must be protected for everyone.

Otherwise there will be complete loss of freedom of speech regarding family and marriage for all non clergy in Australia.

(2)Concerns about same-sex marriage are not just for “religious” reasons.
(3)Many Australians are concerned about the accompanying changes to education, the de-gendering of society, the increased pressure for commercial surrogacy (USA) and even pressure on adoptions (UK) which has already occurred overseas.

Providing “exemptions” for religious beliefs will not address these concerns.

We must defend these fundamental institutions and the rights of all humans to object and refuse.

(4) Consider historical examples in countries that have legalised same-sex marriage.
They have been growing precedence of restrictions on religious freedom and free speech face increasing when marriage laws are changed.

Examples are diverse but they include wedding businesses sued, (USA) those in leadership positions being sacked, and some even faced jail time(Europe-) for simply disagreeing with same-sex marriage.

This takes on a witch hunt approach.

Australia has a proud history of freedom of speech supported by our constitution.
Please don’t undermine this with the redefining marriage Karen Goderie B.App.Sc.(O.T.)

(Cumb) A. A.O.T.

Rehabilitation Consultant The Commonwealth Government’s exposure draft of the Marriage Amendment (Same-Sex Marriage) BillSubmission 178
Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697632697800.pdf (Australia)
Submission No 82 Inquiry into potential reforms of National Security Legislation Organisation: Ms Madeleine Roberts Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security SUBMISSION TO NATIONAL SECURITY LEGISLATION INQUIRY The fundamental point of view on which these sweeping and radical changes to the surveillance and intelligence laws of Australia is based is that every citizen should be treated as if they are ‐ or will be at some time in their lives ‐ a criminal.
This undermines the foundational principle that living in a free and democratic state represents and destroys the rights of human beings to free speech and freedom of association.
Compelling Internet providers and social networks to retain detailed logs of every citizen's online activities for two years contravenes the right to free speech and ability to associate with others and could be used just as readily to undermine oppositional groups who disagree with the government of the day as to detect potential criminal activity, especially when the government has the power to determine what 'criminal' means.
Compelling individuals to provide authorities with access to their private data ‐ including passwords to their computer ‐ without cause and threatening them with jail time if they refuse would result in innocent citizens being punished when they have not in fact committed a crime nor have had their day in court.

The government would, in this case, be circumventing the legal system and condemning an individual without just cause.
Allowing secret agencies ‐ whose activities are condoned by the government without the knowledge of its citizens ‐ to add, modify or delete existing files on an individual's computer, or access that person's private information and plant incriminating data on their computer that they did not write or own, would be tantamount to establishing a system akin to the operations of the Soviet KGB.
Allowing secret agencies to access individual's private data ‐ with very little accountability for their activities and a lack of corresponding oversight and capacity for secure storage ‐ would effectively enable hackers to access this important information for ill use far more readily because it is stored in one location.
Allowing secret agencies to treat an individual like a criminal when they may have inadvertently become associated in any way with the target of an investigation, and obliging them to provide access to their computer and personal information, so the agency can gather information on the subject of their investigation has the potential to ruin the lives of innocent people who may be falsely accused, jailed, and ill‐treated as well as having their reputation and standing in the community damaged beyond repair.
Madeleine Roberts