Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1698752188753.pdf (Malaysia)
...:.

PARLIAMENTARY SELECT COMMITTEE· ON ELECTORAL REFORMS 10+1 T I R S .
~ ~ .L"!~ _._--- r :] A MATTER OF SIMPLE ARITHMETIC by JOSHUA Y C KONG KOTA KINABALU 25/26 November, 2011 ISBN 976·983·2653·33·2 t: , General Elections 2004 • Listing of Discrepancies of Ballot papers Issued (discrepancies in brackets) (Parliament &State seats) P1-P222; State· 505 for contests &71 Sarawak uncontested.
P1 (215) P2(1) P3(107) P4(1) P5(2) P6(1,OOO) P7(5) P8(31) P9(111) P10(156) P11(533) P12(5) P13(18) P14(117) P15(10) P16(5) P17(5) P18(49) P19(12) P20(110) P21(228) P22(49) P23(57) P24(153) P25(21) P26(81) P27(98) P28(4,843) P29(19) P30(3) P31(43) P32(28) P33(126) P34(31) P35(79) P36(137) p'37(79) P38(36) P39(1,541) P40(118) P41(2) P42(151) P43(1) P44(154) P45(1) P46(23) P47(3) P48(721) P49(59) P50(14) P51(1) P52(1) P53(59) P54(1) P55(1) P56(1,259) P57(40) P58(='l) P59(O) P60X P61(1) P62(O) P63(44) P64(144) P65(1) P66(104) P67(2) P68(O) , P69(O) P70(2) P71(O) P72(101) P73(2) P74(296) P75(19) P76(2) P77(1) P78(1) P79(222) P80(6) ~ P81(876) P82(134) P83(38) P84X P85(1,502) P86(4) P87(17) P88(436) P89(1) P90(20) P91(2) P9.2(O) P93(3) P94(188) P95(49) P96(72) P97(979) P98(94) P99(6) P100{9) P101(266) P102(26) P103(9) P104X P105(4) P106(14) P107(61) P108(1) P109(O) P11C(10) P111(6) P112(162) P113(738) P126(12) P127(223) P128(198) P129(36) P130(752) P131(3) P132(57) P133(76) P134(3) P135(34) P136(132) P137(30) P138(106) P139(1) P140(5) P141(663) P142(1) P143(3) .
P144(O) P145(678) P146(60) P147(57) P148(2) P149(130) P150X P151(O) P152(1,137) P153(74) P154(2) P155(O)P156X P157X P158(2) P159(9) P160(644) P161(1) P162(O) P163(641) P164(1)P165(3) P166X P167(O) P168(14) P169(32) P170(2) P171(9).

P172(82) P173(244) P174(271) P175X P176(9) P177X P178X P179(273)P180X P181X P182(8) P184(11) P186X P187X P188(10) P189(17) Note: X= no comparison; P= Parliament; seats in bold = major discrepancies..
I • ~ ,,> All the returning officers and the elections agents are not allowed Would the Election Commission employer auditors for the votes at I would like to ask the following matters on electoral reform:- (email) 1.

Would the Govemment amend the Election Act as follows: 1.1 Train the election agents including the counting agents as nominated by the Government side and the opposition.

1.2 Pay them allowances for the training and .the day of polling.
1.3 Only two agents (one for the outgoing government and one for the opposition) at each polling booth.

NB: These agents are the linesmen as in football match.

2. the use of phones and handphones at the polling station.

3.

Would an election Court in all major towns be set up as soon as the Parliament is dissolved to handle any complaints until after the polling days?

4. the counting centre?

5.

Would the laws .bechanged for·likelycandidates to seek prequalifi~tion prior to nomination?

6.
6.

Would EC introduce the presentation of birth certificates in addition to • mykad?

{; Would the EC proVide a complete Silt of the election results as declared in each state capital office?

[ no need to wait for the Government Gazette which is normally late.

8.

Cancel all the high deposits and just fix a nomina/sum to allow more people to participate.

9.
9.

Revamp the Registrar of Society in the context of approval for applications of political parties on demand and this would cut down the number of independent candidates for beller organisaUonal standing.

The federal constitution allows free association of tile people·hence a group of people can just do that for the purpose of Gerieral Elections especially those applications had been held up in abeyance for too long.

10.
10.

NRD has failed to allow the nation to have fair, tree and true elections when the electoral rolls are loaded with projectlC and phantom voters.

11.

EC has rigged the General Elections for a hidden agenda now known.

A system of check and balance especially on the ballot papers and the ballot boxes need to be established to make the election as true.

Joshua Y. C. Kong 9 November 2011 to jkpilihanraya@parlimen.gov.my .

, .. 3- i 1 I I I i I , i ,: ' 1-" k · .

I : I " I~, .~., \.

\ S ' ; ' 61 I ! '


,j i i b: I I t II , 117Gl i i : !

!

I litH "'lin ;, rm ' i , : : ; I I i i : ~i !

i GEI!.IEi~L, ~LE~TI NS,I,o,~: M~,!LA)isJ;,'IN ~AklC~ 20J4 Jan lnal,YsJb~ selt (A,''',:' 4H,O~6 1,~!5~OI0794_1112 I ' .<I.i" i : /2i"':"'11 State -NISa/lots I \ ·":1,' \.

I j '" ' I !

I' i I , " I , 12.

PArrAI'fG PO~5 'Pekan : , j , ,.

:, I:· I -bn l :,., ", !

NoiofV tel'S, : Ba/tot ISSI ed , " I i ' '.'


I 8,521 No re/lfcted : C ',' 56, I: ,j &522 "'!1£; ma ority '~E d'l- 1... 1I,,..re ' .

% I I I 1 ' i , !'

i i ' 1 I j ot Rtf fejeq,ed % i majoritY .

"; I \ 1.

I i : IlfL ,,"; 4.491 i i i JH041' I 12661, 80.49; 4.1'.631 :1-3•• ,471 :231 _ n.DI 7;0 I' 9 "t' 7 .9Ii·,:: 8;523' , ,9' ~ 6; ,,/90·1::2 83.3.'14~,05!

I"~ ,5~,a 98' [:~5"'P~: t2"14'11 15~906, ,,: 2 ;92~ " , ' I ' 1:i",....J_-'" 80 6 .
..; ' 'r--r- " T}U3.3!29 1/8.869 :9.104 I"', 3'65 i I I , : ~(~I, ,I: 152.687 i i i ~ 'Extract frOm the book· Malaysian General Elections 2004· Acase of Victory landslide or rigslide by Joshua Y, CKong An illustration of Ballot Papers Issued Discrepancy of 1,502 in this case namely (State 42,548- Parliament 41,046) ,~tal A' i v " " 8,520 8.52/ 8,522 : I 18523 rrch" I' .... ml ,U tot~' q , , , - , ' , ,i I I , I : roo; 80.~8 ,I. j 1/671:' "(I~", ,IOil ,'.

', i i ' " .

, .

_".

i !

, . '

' : , .


, ' i ;,..::... _ ' ; I i ,I : •.:.

: ~.

I : .

: !

i I , !

: : ' !

!

: ; : : i : .

I I l , ; ; .

j , L' , ,1-' +'I I I, 1 -j".

, DNO)!

.

:> 'A'dnHSOr i , I "1, ," : 1.

Introduction .

Commandment 10+1 .. a matter of simpl~ arithmetic 1.1 Why PSC instead .0fROyal Commission ,of Inquiry on ElectoraLReform or rather Election Commission on the conduct of elections as,the focus?
1.2 It is obvious that exposure of the truth would be limited and public concern' and .awareness restricted to lesser number of people at great public funding.

2.

What have Idone recently on the conductof EC 2.1 Since 2004 ,fPolice Reports on Ie and EC out 0130 PRs PR 1.EPIC (Extra People IC) 28 October 2004KKlrptJ23408/04 PR 6.

UMNOSabah and its' membership (USKA) "KKlrptl27530/04 21 Dec 2004 PR8.

illegals under P1/P2· 'Project Mahathir' Karamunsing Rptl0227/0621 June 06 PR9.
The PoiiceReport On the conduct of the 11th National General·Elections and ,10th Sabah State General Elections-' ,21 March 2004 by the Suruhanj~ya Pilihan Raya (SPR)1 Election Commission (lEC)K'sing/Rptl10281/06 26Dec06 PR14.
EPIC OF SABAH .K'sing/010000/07 PR16 the Elections Commission K'sing/011997/0710/0812007 PR23 General Elections 2008 Luyang 001100/088 April 2008 Most of these reports had been extended to MACC, EC, Suhakam, press and pursued via Public Complaint Bureau for followed up attention and action.

PSC to succeed?

,RCI is definitely the better ansWer.


Identity Cards..,genuineand dubious'in the hands of , 07/0712007 2.2 Then I filed two cases on GE 2004 and GE 2008 at the High Courts of Sarawak and Sabah in 2008 and the GE 2008 cl:ise wl:is drl:igged on by the Courts beyond the six months when the defendentsfailed to tum up for· the first !hearing.

The High'Cout'ts struck out the two cases for technical factor "5"- Is this change possible?

and not interested to hear the contents of the cases in Open ': Court.
The, prpceE\lclin9s were all done in "discreet?

including sudden q'uestitmable.

changes in the JUdge~' chambefS.

Several affidavits were done for each case.

It was obvious with foregone ;conclusion as.

what happened to the Judges who presided on the two' cases.

.

"Rewards"could be "co-incidental".butwhy so fast after my cases?

2.3..Submission of messages by .email and fascimile.

3.

Key factors of free, fair and JRUE.electipns.

What is free when elections trave been so eXPensive?
This fact needs to be dealt with in great strides as this concept "free" would need a major revamp for' those SOme major players involved - political parties vis-a-vis the Registrar of Societitt, National Registration Department, Police, MACC, the Judlf:iary.

The amount of money incurred for General Elections for whole range of activities are' so massive and such money can be better applied for addressing many pressing issues in society.
It isobliious who are ,the big spenders excessively wasteful incurring abuses of pUblic funds in so many ways andye\ get away with those' glaring election offences' in successive general elections.

What is Fair when we can observe so much lopsidedness, prejudice and bias in the conduct of General Elections so much so the many instances of elections offence committed were not deait with by the relevant authorities.
The very much questio~ed :eleCtoral rolls is the .fundamental b;:lsis for fairness:- I strongly believe Malaysia (not only in Sabah) has about 5 millions Project IC holders and most of these in the Rolls.

What is TRUE as the substance of any General Election is where the ballot papers issued are appropriate/correct without any discrepanciE:!s?

So we need to focus on the ballot boxes, ballot papers, and polling day until declaration of results.

A complete system fromthe'aay of nomination with the - cJ -.
j; l it '( canclidatElsp~$entiJ;1g ,their,J;lirt~ ~rt.ifi~t!!

!l'l iJ;1 adliiticlO.to the.

.

ideiltity'>card$i'toJhe 'day of,.P9!1ing ·'!J.PJft91!~~~· t!~e of th~. '

decJ~r~pn of,.I....ioners., Thed$y$t~m)~!Q;iJ;1c'''lc;(~,!!

:t,aiec;>ntrOJ of b~llE)t1bOXElS1~0.b~reach'$eJj~IIVls",,~.9.ef.~#a@m1,:9!Y~IjI,,~~ ~'I; can~ldates,t~e,prmtIO"g';E1ndfcqotrrpbQflI)~J,q~iRElpeJ~od;',J'l!t.of.

, the serial nurilbers,oftheprin!eg ~aIIQtp~p.ElrJ.C?r;El<.!9t;q.~~t"to.

be given to' all candidates,aod/o"p~te9 ,in.'


tge,p.Y9/ip.

:: IJqtj~ boards' at ,independent .

auditorsl scrutineers aUheICQunting(centre~,an~it~~l.fe~~lts can only;be, .

declared after,a due process·of checking••, the counting centres, '.

.. " ' .

.

J," I " .

'.

.

; " We as voters and the patriotic.~itlzeOlt ofthe,nilt!On wa!

'lt to see some real changes for the better, in several 'major items of crisis proportion ·and electQral .. reform J$ just OI'lEl .of the items.'
Since we are under the que$tioned'ill~~';~Qvel'J1ment (state and federal),and.

another'General~l~cticlO under such scenario would likely .perpetu~i~·thepre.V~"!

(lg$ituat!Ori;for another term of near anarchic governance to~@s pt()f1igacy.

So it is timely and surely right to' ask that, an lnteriil'l Good instailed by Royal Governance Government Command with concerned personalitiies w~odcrno~,belong to ,,,.. the political parties on both sides...', IGGG be" .. . '
... if ... , I i I. I I i ' I II II I I I !

I ' i:.... , doubt'ithe present is illegal Government In all sincerity, Prepared' to implement whatever that are suggested for Etect~raIReform.

, also do 'not have any faith in the present Election CommiSsion to '~pplythose reforms for free, fair and triJe 'elections.

I 'can fore~~Efthat this PSC is a futile event and our precious time and effort' is going to waste if only some 'plastic surgery'is doneto'lleceive the voters.

., " .
., " .

What we havesuggested'have"Sllbstance and what may be applied and implemented"han b~ in great discrepancies for free, fair and true election.

:Since the iUegal Government has been sustained by rigging fur decades, what chance I is there that it would'sim;endefpowefwhen all the checks and balance are applied andimplementedstiictly? '
I I While I have listed 'iComm~ndmer.lt 10 + 1" where the el~venth one is the'focus of rlIy presentation which is also the fo~us of this;handbut and ',my,'book "Malaysian General Elections 2004 - 'sease of victOry -'landslide or rigslide.

, - .... " r ' My Yellow cOver book on GE2004contains a host of election offences largeiy'i9nored by' thi Election Commission which has Clearly I jeopardise Free, 'Fliir and True Elections.
I had intended to write another book on GE2008 based on Police Repo.rts and'mycas~to the Hi9h' Court.

• • : . '

C.l".

.

.

- The evidence of tl1e'abserice ofiFree, Fair and True election is li1o,ov~~helnilrigisomueh so the election reforms and other r~foi:ms'wouldtiikeat'east"two'years of Interim Good Gpve~nance,GOv~mmenflGGG:~efore the nextGE13.

I am pr'eparEil~, tohelrtithfs ;'~GG!fi:>rthe ~ood of the nation and for ~II the peop/e91Malaysla.

I " , I I , " '~.
I " , I I , " '~.

: -,' Pleasel'efer to page 9"'fOi',mOre':summarisedsuggestions of Free, Fair and True Elections: Joshua Y. C. Kong 21 Nov 2011 .. :J -6- ' Summarised suggestions of Free, Fair & True Elections 1.

1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Free Cost of Candidacy - deposits.

Cost of campaign as out of control No disturbance by Regis,trar of Societies.

No Abuses of Government assets by incumbents.

Vote bribes to be properly monitored.

IC retention disallowed.

".•.


Easy access to lodgement of complaints at normal Easy access to EC and other election agents for Special courts to accept/record evidence and tei...hear Fair Fair and justified access to the media of all types and 2.

2.1 no questionable editing.

2.2 hours.

2.3 complaints daily as soon as the Parliament is dissolved.

2.4 instructions and documents.

2.5 2.6 3.

3.1 nomination centre.

No nomination on Sunday or Public holidays.


3.2 Electoral Rolls without phantom and project IC voters.

3.3 3.4 Comprehensive system of control over ballot boxes, ballot papers, and audit of ballot papers at the counting centres.

htlp:lIge-2004-2008.blogspot.com/2009/01Iin-defence-of-public-inleresl-app eal.hlml: htlp:llfresh-air-in-iggg.blogspot.com/: htlp:llmigs-sabah.blogspol.com/ Venues for campaign unhindered.

EC not to be bias.
EC not to be bias.

True Candidates to present Birth certificates and IC at the htlp:llmalaysian-eleclions-2004.blogspol.coml Joshua Y. C. Kong -9- ...-.

=.

, I NOTES .

"y .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

."

' ~!~'t., ~"''''''','''.

"H''',', !

,.

","'=.

i"·, !

General Elections 2008 - Listing of DiscrepanCies of Ballot papers Issued (Parliament & State seats) P1-P222 with 505 of 576 state seats for contests.
P1(337) P2(20) P3(487) P4(O) PS(SS) P6(17) P7(O) P8(O) P9(4) P10(462) P11(103) P12(1) P13(S7) P14(36) P1S(6) P16(S4) P17(S9) P18(O) P19(8) P20X P21(108) P22(2) P23(O) P24(8) P25(38) P26(12) P27(O) P28(5) P29(20) P30(9) P31(1) P32(O) P33(35) P34(23) P35(114) P36(60) P37(63) P38(56) P39(98) P40(2) P41(1) P42(312) P43(167)P44(521) P45(5).
P46(20) P47(2) P48(29) P49(2) PSO(39) P51(546) PS2(53) P53(8) P54(329) PSS(O) PS6(S) P57(30) PS8(2) P59(1) P60(O) P61(1) P62(3) P63(92) P64(19) P65(3) P66(8S) P67(1) P68(1) P69(1,947) P70(210) P71(118) P72(27S) P73(3) P74(O) P7S(O) P76(20) P77(O) P78(O) P79(O) P80(1) P81(12) P82(1) P83(1) _ P84(21) P8S(O) P86(31) P87(26) P88(204) P89(4) P90(2) P91(31) P92(495) P93(O) P94(92) P9S(1) P96(1) P97(331) P98(550) P99(3) P100(S7) P101(81) P102(6) P103(1) P104(3) P10S(104) P106(1) P107(8} P108(S) P109X P110(611) P111(13) P112(1,293) P113(1) P126(94) P127(461) P128(31) P129(S6) P130(294) P131(745) P132(0) P133(44) P134(0) P135(4) P136(4B)P137(1S0)":l138(73) P139(468) P140(11) P141 (0) P142(1) P143(1) P144(1) P14S(8) P146(2) P147(2) P148(O) e149(33) P150(1,157) P151(0) P1S2(1) P153(0) P154(1) P155(1,078) P156(244) P157(0) P1S8(3) P159(0) P160(478) P1S1(2) P162(10) P163(52) P164(30) P16S(28) P166X P167(5) P168(355) P169(8) P170(40) P171(S2) P172(2) P173(0) P174(1) P175(5S) P176(2) P177(421) P178(146) P179(14) P180(4) P181(4) P183(9) P185(9) P186(O) P187(7) P189(4) P190(1) Note: X = no comparison; P=Par1iament; seats in bold = major discrepancies; @Joshua Y.C.
Kong Mar 2008 jkong823@streamyx.com; " WHAT EVIDENCE on rigging?

The evidence of the rigged general elections especially GE2004 and GE2008 is proven by the records of the Election Commission and it is .convincing that Election Commission rigs· the General Elections and by elections with known agenda to keep the illegal BN/UMNOb dominant party in illegal Government.

Summary of ballot papers issue discrepancies:- GE ·2004 in parliament seats in exgess of 500 was 15; in between 200 and 500 is 10.
(summary at inside front page) GE2008 in·parliament seats in excess of 500 was 9; in between 200 an~500 is 17.

(summary at inside ~ck page) -~B: any discrepancies must be verified by EC.

- ~.

Why waste trillions Ringgit (yes Trillions lost) for General Election since 1957/1963 to be cheated by the Election Commission in the guise of democracy when the illegal, corrupted and desperate leaders don't believe in democracy.

Don't believe the 'thieves' can work for you morally.
Elections Law No need to have any laws on arithmetic solution as logic prevails; It is a'tflatter of adding some numbers and when numbers don't add up\'for each parliament seat, the results should'te held up for audit.

System of Verification .. A system of verification from the printing of ballot papers to the counting of votes ballet bexes included should be in place as the major focus of Electoral Reforms.

Commandment 10+1 • a matter of simple arithmetic FREE, FAIR & TRUE ELECTIONS .

..:..'2- ..