Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1697751513740.pdf (Georgia)
Evaluation of research activities Tbilisi - June 14th and 15th Pascal Marty Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon and Hcéres - High Council for Evaluation of Research and Higher Education Session 1 – How to use evaluation report for further development of research activities?

Dissemination and communication of evaluation results ; ratings and rankings ; resource allocation and evaluation ; follow-up.
Dissemination and communication of evaluation results • Adversarial process • Quality of the report • Transparency – Identification of potential readers • Authorities • Colleagues • Students • … and their families – Full publication of the evaluation report?

• Public / non-public version • Memory - archives ratings and rankings • Ratings – A+ / A / B / C – Outstanding / excellent / very good / good – Global / per criteria – Methods • Milestones – E.g.
: A+ = 20% best • Rating meetings – Evaluation officers – Experts – chairpersons of experts committees ratings and rankings • No ratings – Qualitative judgements • Metrics ?

Support / supplant expert judgement.

– Strengths • Better acceptation of the evaluation process • In-depth analysis – Weaknesses • Underestimates weaknesses • Does not show a clear hierarchy • Less useful for decision making?
resource allocation and evaluation • Performance-based research funding (PBRF) – allocation of institutional funding on the basis of ex post assessments of university research performance • Resource allocation – Human resources – Research funding • Funding allocation formula?

– Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) resource allocation and evaluation • Funding allocation formula?
– Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) • metrics-based PRFS • Metrics-informed peer review • peer review based research evaluations • peer review (universities or research organisations) resource allocation and evaluation • Funding allocation formula?
– Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) • metrics-based PRFS • Metrics-informed peer review • peer review based research evaluations • peer review (universities or research organisations) – metric-based / mixed • f (Workforce) • f (workforce*performance) • f (workforce*performance*strategy*relevance*impact*...) – Funding vs eligibility to funding follow-up • “usefulness” of evaluation – Time-consuming et resource consuming process • Interpretation • Recommendations – Scientific vs managerial – T(e)+ 1 • Changes in the evaluation process – Professionalisation – performance Peer Review in Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) – MLE on Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS).
European Commission, July 2017 Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem • Research ecosystem Energy Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem • Research ecosystem Energy Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem • Research ecosystem Energy + interactions (positive and negative) Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem • Generic vs local Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem • Generic vs local • Trajectory Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem Session 2 – Discussion : evaluation of research and local / national research ecosystem • Generic vs local • Trajectory – National R&HE policies – EU Framework • EHEA… – International benchmarking • International competition vs domestic-local needs in Education and research გმადლობთ თქვენი ყურადღებისთვის Thank you for your attention