Source document: https://docs-lawep.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/1698931104104.pdf (Uganda)
o I o o PARLIAMENT OF UGANDA mauAulNT oa D+ nEPU6Ir( oF U6ANO REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF NATIONAL ECONOTTY ON THE REQUEST BY GOVERNMENT TO BORROW USD $Ag MILLION FROM THE ISLAMIC ,DEVELOPMENT BANK, FOR FINANCING THE SUPPORT PROJECT (LEleSPl LOCAL ECONOMIC GRO KTH IL3, \" W ) .k' I J DECEMBER 2018 -K As CF'-" , A 2 1.O INTRODUCTION Hon.

Speaker, Hon.
Speaker, Hon.

Members, the Committee on National Economy considered the request by Government to borrow USD $ 33,OO0,OOO from the Islamic Development Bank for financing the Local Economic Growth support Project (LEGSP) accordance with Rute 166 (2) (b) of the Parliamentary Rutes of Procedure.

The request was presented to this House by the Hon.

Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development on 1lttr September, 2018 and accordingly referred to the Committee of National Economy for consideration.
o The committee considered and scrutinized the request and now begs to report 2.O METHODOLOGY 2,L Meetings The Committee held meetings witJ:r; i.

The Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development; and ii.

The Ministry of Loca1 Government; 2.

Document Review ,-.
'- ( Committee further studied and made reference to the follo The Minister's brief on the loan request; li, The Project Appraisal Report dated October, 2OlT; The draft instalment Financing Agreement between the Republic of uganda and the Islamic Development Bank (lDB) for financing the Local Economic Growth Support Project; Letter of no objection from the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Indust and fisheries on the Local Economic Growth support project dated 17n r",Xl11it;ort or the Loca.r Economic otk ,oro., Ministry of Water and Environment dated 17e Jul y,2OI8 t rom the ,ct v I lPage Nw-/ ( t F; 7- a,*kr'g documents; rrc" 2.3 Field Visits The Committee also undertook a field tour to Isingiro District to access the implementation of the Millennium Villages Project whose interventions are similar to that of the Local Economic Growth Support project.
3.O BACKGROUND Local Governments are the frontline service delivery points.

They derive this mandate from the provisions of the LG Act CAP 243 and other provisions and bye-laws of the decentralization policy.

The drive for Local Economic Development and Community Driven Development is taking root and will focus Local Government on productive activities which are indispensable of the challenge of increased local resource mobilization.
Government's focus on socio economic transformation and wealth creation at the household level clearly establishes the local governments as a major channel for development expenditure.

o The Local Economic Growth Support Project is a consolidation and replication of the Millenium villages Project phase I and II (2004-2016) that was implemented in the district of Isingiro in South Western Uganda.
This project is inten{gd.to scale up the key achievement of the Milrenium villages Project to er di icts in the country ECONOMIC GROWTH SUPPORT PR t#.

lLy T LINI(AGE WITH ER, o 4.O COUNTRY STRATEGY qs- \ e Local Economic Growth Support project will support th plementation of Uganda Vision 2040 and the Second National Development plan.
Uganda,s ision 2040 framework has set out the vision for the economic transformation at Uganda seeks a "Transformed Ugandan societ5r from peasant to Modern and Prosperous country within 3o years".

NDp II provides the framework for the country's planning and development to achieve tlris vision, focusing on ) Pa ge &-- /{ I 2' .

* strengthening "Uganda's competitiveness for sustainable wealth creation, Employment and Inclusive Growth".
5.O LOCAL ECONOMIC GROWTH SUPPORT PROJECT COVERAGE ?he Local Economic Growth Support (LEGS) project will be implemented in 6 selected districts.

These include, Isingiro, Gomba, Nakaseke, Bukedea, Amuria and Oyam.

In addition to the above 6 districts, the project will cover the Rural Finance Scheme that will cover 8 additional districts namely;Adjumani,Buyende,Buikwe,Tororo,Luwero,Kibuku,Kyenjojo and Rukungiri.
a 6.0 CRITERIA F'OR SELECTION OF BENEFICIARY PROJECT DISTRICTS Criteria used to select the beneficiary districts include; i.

Severely water stressed areas; ii.

Status of development indicators particularly poverty rates; iii.
Potential for economic activities,tramsformation and contribution national growth; lv Population and demographic features; and Distri tion and status of basic and economic infrastructure \" o i\ \*> CAL ECONOMIC GROWTH PPORT PROJECT OBJECTTVE The overarching development goal of the Local Economic Growth Suppo Project is to accelerate the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (sDGs) especially tl:ose related to the eradication of povert5r, hunger,ensuring good health and well-being, quality education, clean water and.
sanitation among others in the selected benefici ary districts e specific objectives are to enhance agricultural production and.

productivity rough; i.

Water for enhanced agricultural productivity and environmental &.

conservation; and ii.


Support to v J Plge \y ain development for im \YJr- proved households income fr .J &*'e'qt 8.O PROJECTDESCRIPTION The project will use a holistic and integrated approach based on scientifically proven interventions in agriculture, education, health infrastructure, and business development.

The implementation of the project will significantly improve and increase household incomes particularly those of smallholder farmers, women, and youth groups.
It will lead to the improvement of agricultural practices and agricultural productivity in the beneficiary communities.

The project will provide some basic rural infrastructures that will contribute the creation of employment opportunities, especially among women and youth.

a 9.O PROJECT COMPONENTS The project is composed of the following 3 components; i.

Water for Enhanced Agricultural productivity and Environmental Conservation ; ii' support to Household Livelihood and value chain Development; and iii.
Support to Project Coordination and Management ES" e 1: ProJect Components and Description i Component name Component descrlption Tabl i No' i- Water for Enhanced Agricultural Productivity and Environmental Conservation \ 4 're' $/ market roads.

water schemes in the 6 districts.

.

Development of small scale solar powered irrigation schemes covering a total of 1,5o0ha.

r Random water source assessments.


o Design and construction of appropriate solar powered rural r Establishment of Water User Associations.

o Opening and rehabilitation of 300km access to farm and r Construction and renovation of farmer produce storage o Construction and renovation of farmer produce marketing r Construction and renovation of milk collection centres.
o Establishment of community Ied artificial insemination ' o Construction and renovation of processing plants for yards in underserved parishes.

facilities.

units.

selected crops.

a blishment of communi nurserles rq .

*r Component name Compouent description Support to Household Livelihood and Value Chain Development a 3 Support to Coordination Management l l l Projec la and a a a a a a a a a Train farmers in land management and environmental conservation techniques.
Set up shared solar mini-grid systems.

Establishment of community biogas systems Demonstrating the agronomic and economic potential of fertilizers through on farm demonstrations.

Provision of quality seed and fertilizers.

Setting up training and demonstration centres for improved agronomic/Iivestock technologies.

Procurement of power tillers and accessories.

Support cooperative societies in managing the operation and maintenance of farm machinery for sustainable use.
Establishment of 18 training and demonstration centres in the selected districts.

Training of agricultural extension workers.

Support the provision of rural credit for agricultural inputs, appropriate technologies, farm machinery, tools and post harvest handling implements.

Establishment of a project management unit and Iaison unrt.

r Familiarization and startup workshop.

.

Project financial management and Audit.

.


Project desigrrs, Midterm review, monitoring and evaluation and technical backstopping.

Source: Project Appraisal Document, October 2Ol7 1O.O PROJECT COST AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS The total cost of the project is estimated at USD $so.+o million.

Alt custom duties will be paid by the Government of Uganda through counterpart funding.

The project estimated costs are shown in table Table 2: Financing Plan of the project (USD$ Million 2 ..*."

""\V.'
""\V.'

V o IDB-Installment Sales B-Loan Govemment Commun 33.00 10.00 4.8 2.6 Source: Project Appraisal Document, October 2O17 5 lPa,ee ffi" 65.5Y" 19.8% 9.s% 5.2% 1 w (D*$"x t t Table 3: ProJect Cost by Component in US$ Millions ProJect CoEponeat Total IDB GoU Community Instellment sale Loan Loan 16.24 9.18 2.133 13.065 7.76 1.623 27.55 22.45 ,r< 7.17 o.925 o.26 0.325 0.235 3.74 1.42 10.43 2.79 9.A2 0.61 1.69 0.3 o.
175 72.62 1.69 9.82 o.3 o.79 Co and marke A: {Iater for Euhanced Agrlcultural Productivlty aad Enviroamental Conservation A.1.

Increase access to water for production and consum tion for small scale farmers Improve Infrastructure for post harvest A2.

hand throu eratrves A.3.

Enhance Natural Resource Management dA ricultural Productivr for Im Subtotal B.

Value Chaln Enhancement for Iacreaeed Household Incone El1.

Increase Acess to affordable and sustainable Rural Finance 82.
Facilitate the adoption of improved agronomic/livestock practices and appropriate technolo Subtotq.l C. Support to Coordination C1.

National Project Management Unit C2.

District Project Liason Unit Sttbtotal ProJect Management aad Tota.l Ba.se Costs Contingencies (10%) Total Project Costs source: ProJect Appralsal Document, October 2Ol7 50.40 4.61.
3.t2 2.45 5.57 45.74 3.t2 2_444 5.56 29.70 3.3 33-OO 0.03 o.03 4.07 o.73 9.82 0.18 10.oo 4.8 2.2 o.4 2-6 ( }.---a ls \^r 11.O IDB LOAN TERMS AND BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS Islamic Development Bank will make available US$ 43 million corresponding to 85% of the financing of the project.

The linancing shall comprise the following financing windows g 4 o Installment sale of US$ 33 million for which 7O/o is a loan under the installment sale, while 30% is a grant.
r An additional US$ lomillion IDB Page Y\(L- ct '7- \K+ a.k a o This makes it a total of US$ 33 million as debt, while the US$ 10 million witl be a grant.

11.1 Loan Terms of US$ 28 Million under the Installment Sale Financing Installment selling is the sale of goods or service in accordance with the terms of a contract whereby a part of purchase price is paid at the time of the sale, while the remainder is paid in specified installments at stated dates of stated intervals.
Under Installment sale IDB will transfer the asset to government at an agreed value (sale price) including a mark-up.

Installment sales contract is a type of credit sale.

IDB will grant the loan and sell the asset- (project infrastructure) to Government of Uganda in installments and obtain the price in future.
Under the installment sale mode of financing (providing US$ 23 million) the bank will establish the infrastructure therein(the asset) at a capital cost of us$ 23.08 million, with a funding spread of 11obps; and other terms that are indicated in table 4 G rie- & q@ €)- 7 lPage I I f Table 4: Loan Terms under the installment Sale financing (US$ 20 million) Item Loan Amount Loan Period Grace Period Markup ars Terms US$ 23 million 20 ars 5 1 To be applied to each disbursement, the sum of: a) Reference rate of 10 year US$ Mid Swap as of t]le disbursement date hxed for the entire duration of Iinancing b) Contractual spread of 60bps fixed for the entire duration of financing; and c) Funding spread prevailing at the time of disbursement, from 1"t April to 31"t December 2017 is 110bps t Advance Pa5rment 2 3.
The funding spread is subject to semi-annual update by the Bank to reflect cost of funding as published on the Bank's Website.

In the event that the reference is negative, the reference rate shall be deemed to be zero 4.

A mark u rate ca 1 2o/ er annum shall Semi-annua-l payments of accruing mark-up during the estation riod I Source: IDB Drafi F-lnanclng Agreement The sale price by IDB to uganda, based on the above terms will amount to US$ 34.85 million.
This sale price represents the repayment Uganda has to make to the lender (IDB) o The above terms indicate that the 1oan is based on Market interest rate which is the a 1o Year us$ Mid swap plus 100ft of 6o bps (0.60/o), which is a fixed spread; and a funding spread of llobps which will vary depending on rates published by IDB from time to time.
This is approximately equal to an annual 2.8o/o mark up on the sale price EA" G The repayment of the loan will attract a 10 year US$ Mid Swap rate, as the (ry ference rate during the gestation period of r.o9o/o plus 60 bps and a varying funding spread of llobps leading to a total mark up of 2.g%o of the 15 year repayment period as indicated in table 5 lPage r:f \fr\ .& Table 5: Computation of the Capital and Sales price for the project Disbtrrseme nts 10 Year USS Fixed Funding Mark-up No.of (USS million) Mid Swap l'/t Spread lo/o1 Spread t%t years Futu re Value of disbursement 2079 2020 2027 2022 2023 Capital Cost in USS mil I 0 2.3 0 0 2.39 2.39 L.@ L,il 1..79 L.79 1.66 1.66 0.88 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.54 0.55 0.60 0.60 23 1.86 1.85 L.U 7.U 7.U t.u 1.85 1.8s 1.85 1.85 1.84 t.u 7.U 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.8s L.85 1.85 1.8s 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 1.10 1.10 1.
L0 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 L.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.0/1 5.00 4.75 0.04 0.M 4.50 4.25 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 4.00 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.00 0.04 0.M 2.7s 0.04 2.50 0.04 0.ol 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 2.2s 2.00 L.75 1.50 t.25 1.00 o.75 0.s0 0.2s 2.71 2.74 2.72 1.85 L.U 1.99 1.97 L.81 7.79 0.95 0.85 0.93 0.92 0.56 0.56 0.61 0.51 23.08 Sale price in US$ million Source.'
IDB Draft Financlng Agreement & PBO Stalf Computatlons o.ffi% 1.Oy/o 1o/o 2.79% I 15 u.u9 o Therefore the above loan is a market based loan which requires that the project starts generating reve nue for Government over the medium term as provided for in the PDMF2O13.

a-" E& Below is the table indicating the level of concession un e installment sale financing window ty of the above loan terms L 9 lpage ) /.
M \w J @ a.& Table 6: level of Concessionality of the Loan Item Value/rate Grace riod ears Debt senrice of the loan uS$ 34.s5 million Dlscount rate 5% Source,' Appraisal Docurnent, IDB Drafi Flnancing Agreement and pBO Staff Comtrrutatlons Table 6 shows the conditions required for Iinancing this loan.
The present value of this loan (US$ 34.62 million) is higher than the nominal value of this loan contracted (US$23 million) which implies that the country,s total future payment for this loan is more expensive than the amount to be borrowed in present times.

I This implies that the loan portion of the installment sale is a commercial loan since its grant element (-51%) is less than zero.
Therefore the financing of the above project will require it to generate immed.iate returns to Government in terms of revenues in the medium term.

r\oN Despite the loan portion of the installment sale bei blended with a grant of US$ 10 milion.

This makes the installment sale less commercial for social sector ng a commercial loan; it's the US$ 33 million under interven tions by IDB ..---7 ES^, $ 10 lPage Nt&- ,t"/ h w c& ?''
w+ w \\A 11.2 Loan Terms under the Loan Facility of US$ 1O Milllon Table 7: loan terms under direct lending facility Item Loan Amount Loan Period Grace Period Senrice Char Source: IDB Drafi trllnanclng Agreement Jor the Loc:n Terms US 10 million ars 25 7 ears l.5o/o of the disbursed amount Lt.2.l Level of Concessionality of the Direct Lending Facility- US$ lO Milllon Table 8: Level of concessionality for the Direct Lending Facility , Item Re Grace period Debt senrice of the loan Gran Discount rate Source: Appraisal Do Computations Value/rate afs US$ 10.150 million 5o/o cument, IDB Drq.ft Flnancing Agreement and pBO StafJ Table 8 indicates that the Present value of the loan facility (US$ 4.746 million) is less than the nominal value of the loan (us$ 10 million) which implies that the country's total future payment for the loan is cheaper than the amount to be borrowed in present terms o The loan is highly concessional since its grant element (53%) is higher than the threshold of 35% level for concessional loans ES fore, the IDB funds are a blend of a commercial loan facility under the e stallment sale; grant and a highly concessional loan (cheap loan) l1 agc @ \v\ 7/\k I1.3 BUDGETARY PROVISION DURING THE F"T aOLAIIg During the FY 201.8/19 government made a provision of ushs o.o6 billion as counterpart funding to undertake project preparatory activities.
subsequently government needs to make adequate counterpart financing for the project to avoid any implementation delays over the medium term.

t 12.O PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION The project will be implemented for a period of 4 years.

The Ministry of Local Government will be the Executing Agency for the Local Economic Growth support Project.

The Permanent secretary (pS) of the Ministry of Local Government will be responsible for the project disbursement and accounting.
The respective technical departments in the beneficiary districts will be responsible for the day to day implementation of the project in line with their mandates under the decentralization policy.

The Microfinance Support Centre will be an implementing partner to the project that will be responsible to channel the line of Islamic hnancing to end beneliciaries.
t\ 13.O ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL RATE OF RETURN The project as a whole is expected to generate an Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) of 19.74o/o \* r4.O SUSTAINABILITY e prolect is economically, financially, socially and environmentally sustainable.

The participation of local governments, local community institutions, and producer and marketing cooperatives will build capacities in em to sustain the project.
Investments in rural infrastructure with the ttendant establishment of maintenance bodies and fund.s like farmers soclation, water user committees etc, will raise awareness about ustainability of the investments.

The skills knowledge, work ethics plus the Page --( @ .v .

* ?

o a building of self help groups plus investment in community approach will generate capacity that will sustain the project.
15.O THE LOAN AND THE CURRENT DEBT SITUATION OF THE COUNTRY This loan will increase the country's public debt that has been on the rise over the years.

The provisional total public debt stock (at nominal value) as at end of June 2018 stood at Ushs 42,o84.7 billion (42.oso/o of GDp) (Bank of Uganda Annual Report 2Ol7 118).

This is an increase of 21.6 percent relative to June 2or7.
The external debt stock amounted to Ushs 28,164.4 billion (2g.1% of GDP) while the domestic debt stock amounted to Ushs 13,920.3 billion (13.9o/o of GDP).

16.0 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS coordination with other MDAs.

The committee noted that efforts have been made by the Ministry of Local Government to ensure that there is coordination among respective MDAs in the implementation of this project especially for interventions whose mandates fall under other MDAs.
For example, the Ministry of water is mandated to ensure that adequate supply and improved sanitation reaches all communities countrywide, and project's interventions are in line with the ministry of water and environment missio d soals "vater C r"t^, The committee recommen implemented smoothly, the Ministry of Local Government should; Liaise with the Technical Support Units (TSUs) of MDAs in t respective areas of project implemeatation.

that for this proJect to succeed, and b i c fi @ c[ 7---' -k .
Harmonise the proJect with the source per village principle in order to improve sen ice delivery and increase water coverage in areas of project intenrention.

.

The irrigatlon infrastructure planned under the project should be cognizant of the new National Irrigation policy a To manage development lntenrentions.

Vibrant local groups of entrepreneurs should also are created and supported so that there is business to support the development process in rural areas.

o ii.Taxes.
o ii.Taxes.

The committee observed that all taxes, charges, fees, duties and cost overruns related to this project will be borne by the Government.

The committee recommends that in order to curb delays in the implementation of thls project, government should ensure that provisions for counterpart funding for this project are adequately provided for.

E3 o iii.National cooperative development policy.


The committee further observed that when women are organised into producer and marketing groups and trained in business development, they become empowered and increase their incomes.

The Millennium villages project facilitated formation and capacity building of businesses and cooperatives, and linked them to prime markets like the world Food programme (wFp).
/The project has also facilitated the formation and capacity building of SACC tment and e courage savlngs .to provid e Iinance for local inves C The formulation ttee ofa recommends that government expedites national cooperative development policy the and N 14 lpag .$ implementation strategy to empower and guide cooperatives in the country.

1V Mode of Financing.


The committee observed that the mode of financing for the project is a blend of commercial debt, a grant and a highly concessional credit (cheap loan), given the social nature of the project.

This makes this type of borrowing cheaper for social projects of this nature.

This vrill reduce the impact on the country's debt sustainability in the medium to long term.
The committee therefore recommends that all social projects in nature be financed with highly concessional finance or cheaper credit/ grants since the returns to investments have a longer gestatlon period when compared to other public investment projects in energy, transport, agriculture, auong others Rural Finance support and project Area.
The committee observes that the project will support provision of rural credit for agricultural inputs, appropriate technologies, farm machinery, tools and post-harvest handling implements by establishing a line of credit of US$ 10 million through Micro Finance Support Centre.

In addition the project will hire consultancy services to build the capacity of rural financial institutions and SACCos.
However, this is being done by other projects like PROFIRA under the Ministry of Finance which is RXoviding support to SACCOS as well E3 culture Value Chain and Agriculture Cluster Development project are so providing inputs and implements/ post-harvest support to farmers.
e @ o v o B rt >_ \ffiN k lPage C The committee recommends that the Ministry of Local Government coordinates with other public project implementation teams in various sectors to harmonize intenrentions and avoid senrice duplicationsl and also spread intenrentions in areas where other projects are not present of the same intenrention.

vi.

Local content during project implementatlon.


The committee observed that key project cost drivers of construction are to be subjected to National Competitive Bidding which does not guarantee local companies to acquire the contracts.

Further the project will entail development of irrigation systems.

a The committee recommends that during project implementation, local content schemes should be created to olfer contracts to local companies of at least 4o% of all procurements.
The irrlgation schemes to be developed should use local manufactured equipment and support small scale farmers.

rr'lr trIater for Production.

The project makes interventions in the provision of water to the farming communities.
However, the untapped areas that could provide sustainable water for local communities especially in areas where there is not water is critical for the project to achieve its targets EL The committee recommends that the project should identify all potential water sources with a view of opening them up for local communities to manage them and facilitate farmers acquire equlp ment to irrigate their \-- a A fields.

16 I [ra ( (: 6 0 6.


Counterpart f inancing The committee observed that Ushs 60 million has been provided by government to undertake preparatory activities for project implementation during the Fy 2Ol8/19.

However, given that government contribution is estimated to be US$ 4.8 million, this provision relative to the total requirement at the end of 5 years is inadequate to fully prepare the project for implementation.
For example procurement of contractors of good and services should have started for about 3OVo of the project.

The committee recommends that government provides adequate counterpart financing starting in Fy 2o1-gl2o and over the medlum term to expedite project implementation.
17.O CONCLUSION o The committee recommends that the request by Government to borrow USD 33,000,000 from the Islamic Development Bank for financing the Local Economic Growth support Project be approved, subject to the above recommendations.

ES, I o I beg to Moae 0 s,L- 17 lpage ct \w @ -$ t , REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF NA?IONAL ECONOMY ON THE REeuEsr By covERNMENT To BoRRow usD $gg MILLION FROM THE ISLAIVIIC DEVELOPMENT BANK, FOR FINANCING THE LOCAL ECONOMIC GROWTH SUPPORT PROJBCT (LDcSPl NAMT Hop.
Bbumba Syda Namirembe C/p Nakaseke North County CONSTITUENCY SI \ 2 Hon.

Bategeka Lawrence V/CP Holma Munlcipality J Hon.

Tayebwa Thomas Ruhinda North e Hon.

Muyanja Johnson Senyonga Mukono South County 5 Hon.

Kamara John Ninzeyimana Bufumbira North 0 Hon.

Kalule Sengo Emmanuel Gomba East County Hon.

Migadde Robert Ndugwa Buvuma Islands County Hon.

Okello Anthony Kioga County I Hon.

Musoke Paul Sebulime Buikwe County North 10 Hon.

Kibalya Henry Moris Bugabula South Hon.

Guma Gumisiriza David Hon.


Nambeshe John Baptist l3 Hon.

Ikojo John Bosco t4 Hon.

Angura Fredrick 15 Hon.

Katoto Hatwib 16 Hon.

Amero Susan Ibalda North County Manjiya County Bukedea County Tororo South County Katerera County Amuria Woman Rep l, NO NAI!

[E T7 Hon.

Mandera Amos CONSTITUENCY Buyamba County SIGNATITRE 18 Hon.
Babirye Judith Buikwe Woman Rep 19 Hon Seguya l. John Bosco Mawokota County South I 20 Hon.Anne Mary Tumwine Ntoroko Woman Rep 2l Hon.Katwesigre Oliver Koyekyenga Buhweju Woman Rep )c Hon.Akamba Paul Busiki 23 Hon.Adeke Anna Ebaju National Female Youth 24 Hon.Nauwat RosemarSr Amudat Woman Rep 5 Hon.Atiku Bernard Ayivu county 26 Hon.Lakot Oruni Susan (Maj) UPDF 27 Hon.

Jack Wamanga Wamai Mbale Municipality Hon.

William Nzoghu Busongora North Hon.

Herbert Edmund Ariko Soroti Municipality (^E- Hon.


JimmyAkena 2 Hon.Ayepa Michael 33 Hon.Lokeris Samson 34 Hon.Kajara Aston Lira Municipality DWR Namutumba Labwor County Dodoth East Mwenge South 35 Hon.

Kabafunzaki Herbert Rukiga County