Product: Credit reporting or other personal consumer reports

You, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK , NATIONAL ASSOCIATION are in violation of the Federal Credit Reporting Act 15 USC 1681 for unlawfully obtaining my XXXX, XXXX, XXXX consumer report without my authorization and permissible purpose under the FCRA. As a result of you unlawfully obtaining my consumer report without my permission or my consent, you are liable to me in actual damage/statutory damage of {$1000.00} per inquiry/enquiry in punitive damages. 

See document attached ; a recent XXXX consumer report, dated XX/XX/XXXX, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, listed as JPMCB CARD, JPMCB, and JPMCB XXXX, proves XXXX ( XXXX ) records of request for my credit history/inquiries, without my consent/permission, listed as deleted as an outcome of a dispute result on my XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX consumer report . 

Im willing to settle this matter with admitted liability, cease and desist from obtaining copies of my consumer report from XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX witho

ut authorized consent. Please be advised, I am prepared to place a commercial lien on your company if you do not comply with this demand. Upon receipt of payment of {$1000.00} per inquiry/enquiry, there are a total of XXXX ( XXXX ) records of request for my credit history/inquiries, without my consent/permission, totaling a sum of {$82000.00} ( XXXX XXXX dollars ), this letter shall be general release of all claims herein. 


In a scenario where JP Morgan Chase Bank has requested a consumer 's credit history XXXX times without the consumer 's consent, there are several potential violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) : * Unauthorized Inquiries ( FCRA 604 ) : JP Morgan Chase Bank may be in violation of FCRA if they accessed the consumer 's credit report without a permissible purpose or without the consumer 's consent.

* Accuracy of Information ( FCRA 607 ) : If the credit inquiries were not legitimate or if inaccurate information was reported, this could be a violation of the FCRA 's accuracy provisions.

* Duty to Correct and Update Information ( FCRA 611 ) : ** If the bank was aware that the information they reported was inaccurate or incomplete and failed to correct or update it, this could be a violation.

* Record of Credit History ( FCRA 606 ) : Excessive and unauthorized credit inquiries may violate the provision that limits who can access a consumer 's credit report and under what circumstances.

* Permissible Purpose ( FCRA 604 ) : The FCRA requires that there must be a legitimate reason ( permissible purpose ) for accessing a consumer 's credit report. If JP Morgan Chase Bank did not have a valid reason for each inquiry, it could be a violation.

* Failure to Furnish Information ( FCRA 623 ) : If the repeated inquiries were part of a failure to provide accurate and complete information, JP Morgan Chase Bank might be in violation of their duty to furnish accurate information to credit reporting agencies.

* Privacy of Consumer Reports ( FCRA 604 ) : ** Excessive inquiries may implicate the privacy provisions of the FCRA that restrict access to a consumer 's credit report without proper authorization.

* Civil Liability ( FCRA 616 ) : Consumers have the right to pursue civil liability against entities that willfully fail to comply with the FCRA, potentially seeking damages.

* Excessive Inquiries ( FCRA 604 ) : If JP Morgan Chase Bank made an unusually high number of inquiries without a valid reason, it might be considered excessive. Excessive inquiries can negatively impact a consumer 's credit score and may violate FCRA regulations.

* Failure to Obtain Permissible Purpose ( FCRA 604 ) : The FCRA requires that entities accessing credit reports have a permissible purpose. If JP Morgan Chase Bank did not have a valid reason for each of the XXXX inquiries, it could be a violation. 

* Lack of Consent ( FCRA 604 ) : If the consumer did not provide consent for these inquiries, it raises questions about compliance with FCRA requirements. Consent is generally necessary for permissible pulls of a consumer 's credit report.

* Continuous Monitoring Issues ( FCRA 604 ) : If these inquiries were part of continuous monitoring without a legitimate need, it might be a violation. Continuous monitoring should be conducted with a valid reason, not as a routine practice.

* Repetitive Requests without a Change in Circumstances ( FCRA 604 ) : If JP Morgan Chase Bank made repetitive inquiries without a significant change in circumstances, it might be viewed as unnecessary and could raise compliance concerns under FCRA.

Chase Issuance Trust Issuing Entity XXXX XXXX XXXX Chase Card Funding LLC Depositor and Transferor XXXX  Number : XXXX JPMorgan Chase Bank , National Association Sponsor, Originator, Administrator and Servicer XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  J.P. Morgan Securities LLC XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX New York XXXX Indenture Trustee and Collateral Agent : XXXX XXXX XXXX , XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, North Carolina XXXX I will file a Form 211 treasury omb forms to audit consumers account. JP Morgan Chase Bank is the sole member of ; Chase Issuance Trust Issuing Entity XXXX  Number : XXXX, and ; Chase Card Funding LLC Depositor and Transferor XXXX Number : XXXX Securitizing consumers data and no permissible purpose under the FCRA for obtaining consumer report without consent of consumer a total of XXXX separate times/inquiries. Violation of Privacy Act of 1974. 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION REPORT FOR IDENTITY THEFT SEE RECENT U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PRESS RELEASE : JP MORGAN TO PAY {$18.00} MILLION FOR VIOLATING WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION RULE