Product: Checking or savings account

TO : BANK OF AMERICA COMPLIANCE HENCEFORTH ( BOA ) SETTLEMENT OFFER FROM XXXX XXXX. 
{>= $1,000,000} - I will settle for alleged violations of laws, but not limited to. 
I XXXX XXXX WILL ACCEPT AND SIGN WAVERS UPON BANK OF AMERICA ACCEPTANCE OF ABOVE-SETTLEMENT OFFER. 
OR- TO FILE SUIT OR SUITS IN THE PROPER COURT VENUE TO BECOME KNOWN. 
THE ( THIS APPEARS TO BE A DUPLICATE WE HAVE ALREADY RESPONDED TOO-IS OVER. 
126 times out of 128 CFPB PORTAL REQUEST. 

NOT LIMITED TO THESE REASONS ALLEGED. 
1- CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS 2-MALFEASANCE 3-SENDING UNWARRANTED THREATS TO PLAINTIFF, using us postal services. 
4-FRAUD-S 5-ADMISSIONS OF GUILT. 
6- OMISSIONS, By intention, and in admissions, by failure to perform a legal duty when one has the capacity to do so is a substitute for the commission of a defined offense when the harm done is the same. 
7- INTENTIONALLY MIS LEADING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE CFPB. 
8.-REFUSING TO REPOND TO INQUIRES -AFTER THE CFPB, CLEARLY INFORMED BANK OF AMERICA COMPLIANCE PER BASICALLY XXXX ALL BUT, TAKING THE 5TH ON 126 of 127 or 128 ARROGANTLY EVEN AFTER THE CFPB, MADE IT CLEAR TO BOA WHAT? THAT BOA, YOUR RESPONSES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. 
8- ATTEMPTING TO DEFRAUD XXXX XXXXXXXX AND THE OFFICE OF THE CFPB, by LIEING TO THE CFPB, UPON THE CFPBS VERY 1st CONFRONTATION TO BOA COMPLIANCE, TELLING THE CFPB, WE HAVE NO RECORDS OF A XXXX XXXXXXXX. BUT YET FOR A SIGNED CERTIFIED LETTER, TO THE BOA COMPLIANCE, WHICH EXPLICITLY EXPLAINED TO THE BOA COMPLIANCE- ALL THAT WAS BEING ILLEGAL PREFORMED, SO SPECIFICALLY DETAILED THERE WAS NO, NOT KNOWING A XXXX XXXX WAS MADE OVER CLEAR. 
9- THIS EVIDENCES TO THE CFPB ALLOWED BY XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX ALLOWED THE CFPB-TO REPROACH, BOA COMPLIANCE AND ALL BUT STATE : WE READ XXXX XXXX EXPLICIT, Signed by BOA COMPLIANCE CERTIFIED LETTER- so STOP THE LIES AND START TO WRITE. 
10- FORCING BOA COMPLIANCE TO RESPOND- with a ludicrously generalized letter of ADMISSIONS, BUT MORE INTENTIONAL ILLEGAL OMISSIONS. NOW ONLY OPENING THE DOOR PER MANY FEDERAL LAWS- TO HAVE TO ABIDE BY- YET BOA MUST HAVE INFORMED XXXX XXXX BOA XXXX MANAGER- THE HANDBOOK WAS EVEN ABOVE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA. Much less DOBB FRANK LAWS, FEDERAL PROTECTION LAWS SPECIFICALLY APPLYING TO ANY GOV BENIFITS ACCOUNT. 
11- COLLUSION WITH BOA MARKETING PARTNER XXXX and bank to XXXX. AS ALSO WAS, XXXX XXXX BANK AT THE TIME OF ALL ALLEGATIONS AND XXXX, BEING XXXX XXXX insurance company. SUPPOSED UNDER A SWORN STATEMENT CONTRACTUAL RECORDED AND FRANKLY FRAUD INVESTIGATION PER CHARGES, XXXX WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR-AND BURYED THEMSELVES TRYING TO COVER UP A BREACH BY FRAUD- 11- OF COURSE THIS IS A LIMITED SCOPE OF ALL ALLEGATIONS TO BE RIGHTFULLY LISTED- BEFORE XXXX XXXX BEGIN- ALLOWING BOA TO XXXX WITH SOME DEFENSE. 

NOTE : I AM ONLY SUEING FOR DAMAGES PER TOTAL IMPACT, although it may appear Im also suing CRIMINAL CHARGES- THATS NOT MY PURPOSE NOR A THREAT TO TRY BY SUCH TO GAIN ANY ADVANTAGE IN SETTLEMENT NOR IN A SUIT IN A COURT OF LAW. THATS ILLEGAL. 

By : THREATENING XXXXRIMINAL DR 7-105. DR 7-105 Threatening Criminal Prosecution. A lawyer shall not present, participate in presenting, or threaten to present criminal charges solely to obtain an advantage in a civil matter. 
FRANKLY I DONT FEEL NO NEED TO SEND THREATS AS BANK OF AMERICA ADMIT-TINGLY DID. Why, well thats in discovery right? RIGHT. 

I Reserve all privileges allowed by laws motions to interrogational allowances AS YOU BOA. 
Then THIS INSANITY WILL BECOME CLEAR.