Product: Student loan

Thousands of students were scammed by Navient into taking out predatory private loans to attend for profit online schools such as the one I attended, XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. As a matter of fact, XXXX  XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX was investigated by the US Congress. 
Because of the numerous claims of fraud and misconduct perpetrated by these online for profit schools, such as The XXXX XXXX of XXXX, I was able to file a Borrower Defense claim with the Dept. of Education against XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and my Fed. loans of {$100000.00} were discharged. 

My loan was discharged based on an ED finding that XXXX  XXXX XXXX made pervasive and widespread substantial misrepresentations that borrowers relied on to their detriment. This conduct affected students who enrolled at XXXX  XXXX XXXX from XXXX XXXX, XXXX through XXXX XXXX, XXXX, when the campuses were sold to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. These misrepresentations related to the salaries and employment rates for its graduates and the benefits and connections XXXX  XXXX XXXX provided to students and graduates. Because of the pervasive and widespread nature of the misconduct by XXXX  XXXX XXXX, ED has determined that it is appropriate to discharge the outstanding loans made to all students who enrolled at XXXX  XXXX XXXX during the time period described above. 

I am aware that Navient was sued by XXXX  state AGs regarding their predatory loans to attend these online for-profit schools and that Sallie Mae/Navient were a " preferred '' lending company in a " deal '' with these schools during the early XXXX 's. These private loans with a high risk of default were part of a package deal offered to " for profit online schools ''. But loans made to students in states outside of the agreement, or those who were not in default for 7 months or more during a " specific '' time frame, were excluded. I am sure this was a big win for Navient, but what a sham of a settlement deal for the rest of borrowers scammed into taking loans to at least XXXX for profit online schools. After the AG settlement, didn't Navient also get out of the Federal student loan business due to scrutiny from lawmakers and borrower advocates? Didn't Navient have to pay restitution to the Federal student loan borrowers for not informing students of IDR/IBR payments students could have enrolled in, but instead steered toward forbearance? Furthermore, hasn't Navient been sued at least a half dozen times for other predatory loan practices and illegal collection practices? 
I am also aware of a " pilot '' program by which Navient is sending out " applications '' to select students who may have filed Borrower Defense claims against their schools and were approved. This application is a sham. Why do we need to prove anything? Navient knows who we are. Under the FTC " Holder Rule '' Navient is liable for giving predatory loans in connection with online for-profit schools. Time is running out for Navient to do right by students who were scammed into taking out private loans to attend online for profit colleges who have committed misconduct and misrepresented themselves to the public to entice students to enroll. Senator XXXX XXXX has sent a letter to Navient 's CEO asking to discharge these loans NOW! It's time Navient do the right thing and discharge all these predatory private loans made to attend online for profit schools NOW!