Product: Mortgage

Countrywide & Bank of America was adjudicated, found liable for damages related to case # XXXX in the U.S Court in the Central District of California managed by the US . Attorney 's Office in Navada. The problem in that, they have XXXX XXXX to whom Bank of America facilitated in embezzling millions including the equity out of my homes located at XXXX XXXX XXXX. in XXXX of $ XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX. in XXXX XXXX XXXX, it was not her house. The case is being investigated by the US Court for Federal Claims, the Office of the Special Masters. It does not matter if I am wrong on what house she financed, she di don't own it. She only arrived in the U.S just months prior to the mortgage that led to the foreclosures of my homes in which both were paid off when she arrived in XX/XX/XXXX. The Office of the Special Masters is also looking into the violation of 18 USC 1956, 1021, 1589 & 1961 as well as 21 USC 848. In other words, local public officials were maliciously deeding XXXX XXXX properties for the purpose of money laundering related to specified unlawful activity related to proceeds. 
The RULE OF LAW : [ 1956 ] states " the beneficiary do not have to know the money was from specified unlawful activity to be held accountable. The STATUTE OF LOMITAQTION is 10 years form the last occurrence in stated Federal violations. you can not sell a man into slavery 3 decades ago & claim the statute of limitation has expired for the non-individual who initiated the sale, and neither can bank of America claim their violations of the CFR regulating the Banking industry are outside the time for prosecution and or appropriate adjudication being that I have been continuously subjected to the loss of property based on Bank of America 's initial illicit activity. the lawyers in XXXX XXXX NC can not subject a XXXX man to slavery and abuse without the complicity of the banks. See 18 USC 1589 1595 as it addresses those who benefit from said violations. As I tried to understand what the local public officials had done, I served Bank of America with a subpoena for XXXX XXXX banking records which would have aided in understanding what all they had done in laundering proceeds related the equity out of my homes before I knew of the case in California and Bank of America declined the subpoenaed records. it is against Federal law to obstruct, interfere in any way to prevent the enforcement of the provisions of Chapter 77 of the US Codes including but not limited to withholding financial records in furtherance of stated violation. Bank of America did all this for XXXX XXXX and she was not a United States Citizen when this took place and not sure if she is a legal citizen now. These felonious acts and more were initiated by the local public Officials to whom I firmly believe are under investigations. We, me and my children were actually sold into slavery when Banks allow lawyers to obtain the equity out of our real property violating fed law. My income was about {$500000.00} a year and has dropped to {$0.00} with the continual abuse initiated by Bank of America and other banks. If you steal the equity out of a XXXX man 's home, he is either forced/ coerced into working or suffer great injury as defined in Chapter 77 of the US Codes.