Product: Debt collection

XXXX court lacks subject matter jurisdiction as this is the improper venue. The court also lacks personal jurisdiction. Any case involving securities is a Federal case per the Federal Reserve XXXX, the Securities XXXX XXXX, and the Uniform Commercial Code. Furthermore, all cases are tax cases and as a non-citizen, the Defendant nor the XXXX, are subject to these taxes. Federal documents from the United States XXXX and XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) has confirmed the citizenship status of the Defendant & Agent. 

This was also settled and proof was uploaded to the online portal. It was mailed out a long time ago addressed to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX of the company. According to the XXXX laws, the IRS, XXXX because they are using XXXX funding, it was considered settled the moment it was put in the mail at XXXX. Heres the XXXX Mail tracking number XXXX. This judgement is null and void. 

Plaintiff failed to provide any proof that money was owed to them and they also failed to provide an expert witness. Any evidence provided by the attorney was hearsay. Plaintiff also used XXXX XXXX XXXX as their sole evidence. The plaintiff knowingly provided that information to an unauthorized party. Thats a XXXX violation with up to a {$250000.00} fine. The unauthorized party knowingly accepted the documents without authorization which is another XXXX violation and fine. Being that the evidence was obtained illegally this also serves as a motion to suppress that evidence. 

I know that the plaintiff actually used to the Defendants name, address, XXXX, and other personal identifying information to pull money from the treasury using their clearinghouse which was then put into an account. The Plaintiff is supposed to be a nonprofit organization yet they are using securities to make a profit. The Defendants application was turned into a security. Furthermore, the statements that were sent claiming money was owed was also XXXX. According to the IRS, anything that is XXXX and is considered income and can not be collected as a debt. A XXXX was also filed with the IRS. 

No original documents with signatures were provided or sworn affidavits with proof. Some of the copies of the documents didnt have complete signatures. Anything that they claim was signed was signed under duress and coercion making even those signatures void. The Defendant would not agree to such absurd charges with a sound and competent mind while having complete awareness. 

The XXXX of the Defendant is making a XXXX XXXX claim of fraud upon the court. The XXXX has become aware of the fact that the case has been turned into a municipal bond. All parties involved minus the XXXX and XXXX have a financial interest in this case. The Defendant has a right to a fair and unbiased trial. Upon further research it was brought to my attention that not only could the court be avoiding taxes, but also the plaintiff is avoiding taxes, and violating laws of the XXXX XXXX, The Federal Reserve, and the XXXX. Upon speaking with the XXXX and looking up the latest Enforcement Actions against the XXXX, the plaintiff is also in violation of the banking regulations. ( XXXX ) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or XXXX ; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated ; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable ; or The XXXX for the Defendant respects the IRS, the SEC, and the Federal Reserve not to mention their laws and processes. One would hope that the court and the plaintiff does as well. If this judgment isnt vacated and thrown out, I plan to continue my research on behalf of the Defendant and reach out to all the proper authorities. That includes filing the proper documents with the IRS, CFPB, FTC, OCC, XXXX, & SEC for them to further investigate my findings and the unlawful attack and theft from the XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

The court and clerk also violated the XXXX Duties XXXX as certified copies of the case were stamped with the proper postage and filed into the case per that act meaning taxes were paid. 

XXXX Collector or the so called attorney failed to provide a copy of their license proving they have a right to practice law. Not a bar card, but a License. Bar card is a private members only club. 

Debt collector shall cease and desist all contact and harassment as they are violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act which is also subject to fines.