Product: Credit reporting, credit repair services, or other personal consumer reports

To whom it might concern, Might it be known that THIS LETTER of consumer check and challenge for lawful reporting compliance is my officially composed writ formal complaint that you are reporting one or more of the following, ILLEGALLY mind you : i ) Your reporting is unproven to be TRUE, so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
ii ) Your reporting is unproven to be Correct ( and regulations are CLEAR on accuracy being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
iii ) Your reporting is unproven to be COMPLETE ( and regulations are CLEAR on mandates to be fully COMPLETE in the application of exacting and reliably consistent precision of any data for reporting being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
iv ) Your reporting is unproven to be TIMELY ( and regulations are CLEAR on mandates to be fully CURRENT and TIMELY in the application of exacting and reliably consistent precision of any data for reporting being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
v ) Your reporting is unproven to be of MY OWNERSHIP ( and regulations are CLEAR on mandates to be fully CONFIDENT in the assignment of OWNERSHIP and or even RESPONSIBILITY to any potentially injurious claim in the application of exacting and reliably consistent precision of any data for reporting being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
vi ) Your reporting is unproven to be of MY RESPONSIBILITY ( and regulations are CLEAR on mandates to be fully CONFIDENT in the assignment of OWNERSHIP and or even RESPONSIBILITY to any potentially injurious claim in the application of exacting and reliably consistent precision of any data for reporting being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
vii ) Your reporting is unproven to be of FCRA COMPLIANCE ( and regulations are CLEAR on mandates to be fully CONFIDENT in the assumption of FULL unmistakable COMPLIANCE to any and all standards of practice as related to the reporting of any potentially injurious claim in the application of exacting and reliably consistent precision of any data for reporting being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. 
Your reporting is unproven to be of XXXX enacted XXXX METRO 2 DATA FIELD FORMATTED REGULATORY REPORTING COMPLIANCE ( and regulations are CLEAR on mandates to be fully CONFIDENT in the assumption of FULL unmistakable COMPLIANCE to any and all standards of practice as related to the reporting of any potentially injurious claim in the application of exacting and reliably consistent precision of any data for reporting being undoubted and irrefutable ), so legally there can be no truth assumed to the allegations of which you report in chicanery lead subterfuge. Notice of my official writ composed DECLARATION of Not Proven Compliant Misinformation that is either or all of the following : DEFICIENT of adequate current status in fullness of TRUTH, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, TIMELINESS, documented OWNERSHIP, certifiable RESPONSIBILITY, or otherwise irrefutable compliant obligatory and regulatory requisite compliant reporting thereby mandating your immediate actions to rectify and remedy and any all infraction- ious behavior ( s ) by retaining or returning to DEMONSTRATED TRUE, CORRECT, COMPLETE, and COMPLIANT METRO 2 data field formatted reporting!

OBVIOUSLY, in this Notice for my DECLARATION of CHECK of COMPLIANCE ( DOCC ) I would like to make known my challenge versus any information by which you fail to present demonstrated PROOF physically to m of the adequate testament of FACTS as related to each and every notation and or aspect of the report allegations, how reported, and the certified Metro 2 Compliance status of any and all entities involved and or tangentially related to the unlawful retaining and reporting of misinformation even beyond my composition of writ complaint compelling you to abide by any and all federal laws and or related regulations within MY STATE. As you might well have concluded, recently while reviewing my report I found a number of likely mistakes and inaccuracies that you are reporting ( again, UNLAWFULLY SO might I add ), among the most troubling are listed below ( see below ) and clearly involves a failure by your firm to maintain reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of consumer credit information 15 U.S.C. 1681. It is with CLARITY that it is UNPROVEN these injurious allegations of VERY severe derogatory nature can not be readily assumed to belong to me. In fact, with your apparent consistency with being extraordinarily INCONSISTENT has to make the question to the actual existence even of this claimed circumstance much less likely being been MIXED onto my credit report by an erroneous reporting error because your company cant maintain accurate information, either WILLFULLY or in IGNORANCE! REGARDLESS, federal laws and civil courts are CONSISTENT in the REQUISITES of all entities involve regularly with reporting of consumer credit reports to be fully and adequately trained and CERTIFIED METRO 2 COMPLIANT. Any claims from an uncertified agent would certainly grant likelihood the information transferred is NOT QUALIFIED for retaining and or reporting per laws of COMPLIANCE for PROVEN ACCURATE and COMPLETE reporting, INCLUDING the full implementation of Implementation of the XXXX enacted XXXX METRO 2 COMPLIANT data entry standards. The item I believe to be incorrect is listed below. I am also including a copy of how this item is reported BY your credit reporting agency. Moreover, I recently requested an investigation regarding inaccurate/erroneous items on my credit file that were being reported incorrectly. In the process of investigating this matter on MY OWN INITIATIVE, I have discovered a POTENTIAL PERSONAL DATA BREACH, since my personal privacy NOW appears to have been violated, I am exercising my rights under the FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 7 ) for a description of the procedure used by your agency in providing all information to the creditor associated with my earlier dispute under FCRA 611 ( a ) .UNMISTAKABLY, Your bureau is now being LAWFULLY COMPELLED by rightful consume DEMAND to provide detailed information in this matter as this matter has escalated into a pending tort action under Telephone Records and Privacy Protection Act of 2006. To be more specific, based on FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ), you WILL forward all of the relevant information provided by you to the creditor for their investigation of my dispute. Please provide me with all of the information you used for your investigation, as required by FCRA 611 ( a ) ( 7 ) .Please reply within 10 days or delete the negative items, as originally requested. If you FAIL to respond to this demand and tort notification, your firm will be added to the pending action as complicit in this data breach of my personal information.

1. Tell me in writing what information you refuse to remove and why.

2. Tell me in writing what you did to determine that the information was accurate.

3. Note the information as disputed BY the CONSUMER on my credit report According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ), you are required by federal law to verify - through the physical verification of the original signed consumer contract - any and all accounts you post on accredit report. Otherwise, anyone paying for your reporting services could fax, mail or email in even a potentially fraudulent account.

According to the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 611 ( a ) [ 15 USC 1681i ( a ) ], these disputed items must be reinvestigated or deleted from my credit record within 30 days. During the investigation period, these items must be removed from my credit report as the mere reporting of items prior to debt validation constitutes collection activity. I am assure questing the names, addresses and telephone numbers of individuals you contacted during your investigation. 

Please notify me that the above items have been deleted pursuant to 611 ( a ) ( 6 ) [ 15 USC 1681j ( a ) ( 6 ) ]. I am also requesting an updated copy of my credit report, which should be sent to the address listed below. According to the provisions of 612 [ 15 USC 1681j ], there should be no charge for this report. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at address noted below. I think 15-20 Days should be ample enough time to get this completed since this is NOT my first time contacting your organization. 

The following claims are UNFOUNDED and as so are ILLEGALLY REPORTING so ERADICATE them each and all RIGHT NOW! 

CREDITOR : PXXXX XXXX XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX  ) ACCOUNT : XXXX NOTATION : Verify and Validate all alleged collection activities accused me above still unproven compliant much less mine or my responsibility. DELETE NOW in its ENTIRETY or else testify in composition to its wholeness in CERTIFIABLE TRUTH, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, undoubtable and documented OWNERSHIP, irrefutable RESPONSIBILITY, total COMPLETENESS as related to the requisite reporting standards to INCLUDE any and all METRO 2 DATA FIELD FORMATTED regulatory reporting obligations such as the exact and full 426-character P-6 Segment ( statement ) along with any and all of its trailing fragments, any and all of the sequential 386 pieces to confirmation of a collection, any and all of the alpha-/ numeric-/and or alphanumeric SOURCE CODES, the credit classification codes, legally and adequately obtained ad reviewed current lawful state photographic identifications, and such as is mandated, whether or not mentioned here and now. Not PERFECTLY COMPLIANT reporting requires immediate eradication of claims, so be it. 

FURTHER, CONFIRM the five key components of our individual identities in case this data breach becomes yet another case potentially leading to my inclusion as a victim of fraud and or of identity theft due to Your DEFICIENT and NOT PROVEN COMPLIENT RETAINING and or REPORTING of consumer records, particularly that of personal identifiers.. Therefore, I must request that your bureau confirm in writing the following personal information : 1- FULL LEGAL NAME as it Appears on my Credit report 2- Legal Address of Record 3- SSN # ( or redacted last 4 digits ) 4- Date of Birth 5- Zip Code for my Home Address The XXXX  enacted XXXX Metro 2 compliant reporting format REQUIRES the precise and exact fully complete 426-character P-Segment or Trailing Segment that is to include the minimally five portioned PERSONAL IDENTIFIERS to which databasing of alleged tradeline information occurs. Per XXXX, auto-populating ANY data field input entry and or application of Slash Entries ( such as XXXX or XXXX, etc ) into the Metro 2 system is automatic call for deletion due to any and all repeating entry as NULL and VOID. More over, the regulatory obligation dictates that any and all data furnishers MUST include an attached TRAILING SEGMENT that absolutely accurately and completely includes ALL of the account of allegation ( s ) specifics! Must be performed in a REAL-TIME browser LOCKDOWN to be lawful. Per CRSA implementation, if a data furnisher fails to respond within20 calendar days, e-Oscar is to terminate challenge in favor of consumers and or auto-escalate any and all consumer complaints to a certified Metro 2 compliance trained SPECIALIST. Being Phase III of the Implementation of thXXXX XXXX XXXX auto-responders are not compliant and unlawful if used by furnishers or accepted by XXXX  .Federal laws mandate MANUAL ENTRY for any and all consumer 's FULL P-Segment PREVIOUS coding for a RESPONSE, please certificate in testimonial fact to this occurring. Submit/re-submit shuffling to populate the metro 2 data fields are illegal. Responsible, Lawful, ethical, and compliant consumer credit reporting is the REQUISITE technical accuracy in EVERY single item retained and or reported to or by any consumer credit reporting agency. Metro 2 compliance requires exacting P-segment, to include the minimal five ( 5 ) portion personal identifiers as well as a PRECISELY and COMPLETELY FULL account trailing segment. Per the XXXX, any and all CRA insourced DISPUTE Specialist MUST BE Metro 2 Compliance Data Entry Evaluation CERTIFIED. Further, this qualifying certification can be REVOLVED by CONSUMER COMPLAINTS per the XXXX  Signing Statement. I repeat, to lawfully retain and or report any claim of information, be it an account or any aspect of such, the must be irrefutable fullness in the truth of reporting, correctness of reporting, COMPLETENESS of reporting, TIMELINESS of reporting and of the reported allegations, undoubtable ownership, irrefutable responsibility of adverse claims, and or adequate and complete INFORMATIONAL COMPLIANCE to the XXXX enacted XXXX Metro 2 data field formatted reporting regulatory standards and obligations to include the 81-month time relevance of account reported/ how reported/when reported, PRESENT and RELEVANT PERSONAL IDENTIFIERS. Further lawful reporting demands that the regulatory compliance rules are applied EVENLY and thoroughly from data provider to consumer credit reporting repository. Accuracy and completeness of all of any and all information, particularly derogatory consumer information, must abide by every and one of current MY states reporting regulations as well as those of federal laws, even the XXXX METRO 2 COMPLIANCE standards due to the implementation of the Credit Reporting Settlement Agreement ( CRSA. ) Is the Personal Identifier information alleged in the reported 426-character P-SEGMENT true, correct, and complete to standards of CERTIFIED METRO 2 COMPLIANCE? 

Please demonstrate adequate proof of precisely true, accurate, and applicable VALIDATION of the claimed reported CREDITOR CLASSIFICATION CODES, or eradicate every single one and each any and all of the adversary derogatory accusations injuring me immediately, TODAY even NOW and HERE! 

Your failure to demonstrate the REQUIRED presentation of composed PROOF as demanded in this declaration would compel me to consult my consumer complaint lawfully to the members of the XXXX, as undoubtedly reporting not only must be true, timely, and accurate but also in its COMPLETENESS of DATA ENTRY presented to any entity INCLUDING all consumer reporting repositories. 

By the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and per the standards of reporting compliance implemented with the XXXX  enacted XXXX Metro 2 COMPLIANCE regulations, I demand that these above-mentioned derogatory items be investigated and permanently removed from my report. It is my understanding that you will recheck these items with the creditor who has posted them. Please remove any information that the creditor can not verify. I understand that under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1681i ( a ), you must complete this reinvestigation within 30 days of receipt of this letter. 

Please send an updated copy of my credit report to the above address. According to the act, there shall be no charge for this updated report. I also request that you please send notices of corrections to anyone who received my credit report in the past six months. 
Thank you for your time and help in this matter. 
Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX E-Signature *Attach copy of ID and Utility bill