"The quality of life ethic is far different from sactity/dignity of life ethic . A quality of life ethic carried out to its logical conclusions does not promote a pro-life society . Instead , there would be genocide against the handicapped , elderly , and people who people of power have deemed life unworthy of life . The problem with this ethic is that it is centered in arbritrary people deciding arbritarily which person passes the `` quality of life `` test ."
"The interesting thing about the 'quality of life ethic ' is that , in a pro-choice framework , it means that we ca n't degrade anyone 's quality of life without their permission . So far from entailing a cull of the elderly , the infirm , the handicapped , and the ugly , the quality of life ethic entails that we can not kill them off . Each person is entitled to the quality of life that they desire where what they desire does not infringe on other 's quality of life ."
"The quality of life ethic is far different from sactity/dignity of life ethic"
"about the 'quality of life ethic ' , in a pro-choice framework , it means that we ca n't degrade anyone 's quality of life without their permission ."