"I explicitly described science as a methodology , not a philosophy ."
"* * Science is more than a methodology . Empiricism and validation by prediction from anticipated regularit is its methodology . If science were nothing more than a methodology , than no science would exist beyond the confines of any particular experiment and/or collection of observations/measurements undergone currently . However , you are right , in so far as 'science ' _should not_ be conflated with and confused for any particular philosophy , with the possible exception of empiticism . But 'should ' is not the issue . The fact is that , falsely and irrationally , you and other materialist have tried , and with great success unfortunately , to convince the public that your materialism and 'science ' are one and the same . Just denying that you have done so , and that you [ and your fellow darwinists ] continue to do so in your every post , does n't cut the mustard ."
"science as a methodology"
"Science is more than a methodology ."