"Sorry to tell you this , but Behe already refuted the idea : Â “ The important question for us biochemists is , can symbiosis explain the origin of complex biochemical systems ? Clearly it can not . The essence of symbiosis is the joining of separate cells , or two separate systems , both of which are already functioning ... Because symbiosis starts with complex , already functioning systems it can not account for the fundamental biochemical systems we have discussed in this book.Â ” ( DarwinÂ ’ s Black Box , page189 )"
"And once again , is this a strong enough rebuttal to assert proof ? no , Behe assumes that a biochemical system that exists today can not have a precursor , or less complex state of existence . Clive did a good job of demolishing this notion with the mouse trap example he lin the debate thread ."
"Behe already refuted the idea symbiosis explain the origin of complex biochemical functioning systems it can not account for the fundamental biochemical"
"enough rebuttal to assert proof biochemical system that exists today can not have a precursor"