"To support creation you must first tackle the concept of something `` outside `` the knowable universe . Because this is irrational , the entire concept of creation is irrational to `` believe `` in . You can believe in it , but you must accept that the belief is not a rational belief ."
"Firstly , we take the actual events of creation and the existence of God by faith - because we were not there to observe the events happening . Similarly , evolutionists must also take the supposed progression of life from simple to complex by faith , as we were not there to observe the events happening and they certainly can not be repeated today . If someone gives you an eye witness account of an event that happened before your time and all the evidence that you have collected does not contradict that account , is it no logical and rational to believe that eye witness ' account ? In a similar way , we have the Word of our Creator who does n't lie and who was there in the beginning . The actual physical evidence fits nicely with what we would expect if the Bible is right , e.g . fossils , mutations , the fact that there are billions of sea things burried in massive `` underwater graves `` all over the Earth - some while still eating or giving birth ( i.e . had to be rapid ) . So if the evidence that we have collected does not contradict what His eye witness account says ( i.e . Genesis ) than , is it not logical and rational to believe it to be true ? In fact , it would be illogical and irrational to not believe it !"
"To support creation you must first tackle the concept of something `` outside `` the knowable universe ."
"Similarly , evolutionists must also take the supposed progression of life from simple to complex by faith , as we were not there to observe the events happening and they certainly can not be repeated today"