"Well lets speculate about how many possible explanations we could concoct if left to supposition . I 'm talking about the only two explanations for the origins of life that have ever been entertained as viable empirically testable concepts in modern science ."
"God is not a testable , valid theory for being and origin . It fails the falisfiablily AND verificationism criteria -- quite badly . It 's also highly subjective . Creationism is n't even a peer reviewed , promulgated theory in any credible community . It would n't , and does n't , last 5 minutes against logic or science . Creationism = continual propagation of the same cut-paste arguments which have been refuted day in and day out , but not heeded . Creationism IS N'T a powerful force -- it 's fraudulant repetition ."
"speculate about how many possible explanations we could concoct if left to supposition . entertained as viable empirically testable concepts in modern science ."
"God is not a testable , valid theory for being and origin . Creationism = continual propagation of the same cut-paste arguments which have been refuted day in and day"