"This is a statement written by someone who obviously has not read scripture . One of the most astonising `` proofs `` if you will , that the Bible is of supernatural origin , is predictive prophecy . Science can not , as you claim , `` explain `` everything , and it has no natural explanation for the predictions made in scripture . How can science explain through statistical probablity the over 600 prophecies in Biblical writings that have come to pass ? Also , how can it explain how supposedly uneducated people ( uneducated in the ways of modern science ) wrote about astronomy as if they knew about the universe as we do today . How could they have described the hydrological cycle as we have only come to know it recently ? ]"
"600 ? Oh really ? Looks like the following scriptures are vague enough that they could apply to anything and nothing at the same time . Making vague enough comments can easily look prophetic . The fact that there are n't specifics is a key failure in your argument . If the bible was truly prophetic and scientifically accurate , terms that would easily be seen as represenativive of the natural force would be found everywhere , yet they are not . You are talking a little and making it to be far more then it is . Once again , anything vague enough can be taken for anything in any light under any condition ."
"Science can not , as you claim , `` explain `` everything , and it has no natural explanation for the predictions made in scripture"
"If the bible was truly prophetic and scientifically accurate , terms that would easily be seen as represenativive of the natural force would be found everywhere , yet they are not ."