"Hello , please read http : //www.reasons.org/resources/apo ... ing.shtml ? main It is a good christian site that explains that there are lots of problems with Dr Russell Humphreys ' hypothesis ."
"Some interesting information , that website where you got your link from , `` Reasons To Believe `` ( RTB ) is not a creationist organisation . It is run by compromising Christians , such as Dr Hugh Ross . Answers in Genesis have got quite a lot of information on him and as a result have even more rebuttals to his arguments . Here are several links : http : //www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4149.asp http : //www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4128.asp I did notice , however , that the RIB article was written in the year 1999 . This is most pecular , because the AiG article in which Dr Russell Humphreys defends himself is written in the year 2000 . The following link is a very brief summary of how Dr Humphreys defended himself and his new Relativistic Cosmology from compromising Christians and evolutionists : http : //www.answersingenesis.org/docs ... 10-10-2000.asp The following link is where Dr Russell Humphreys defends himself . It shows both the arguments and his rebuttals : http : //www.trueorigin.org/ca_rh_03.asp I would strongly suggest that you read it . I can definitely see how you may doubt Dr Humphreys new Cosmology , that was a pretty heavy attack , the much of it went zip , right over my head . But I just ca n't help but feel that they mis-interpreted several lines and are using some straw man attacks . I personally can not see anything wrong with his arguments , although if there is , he has given way for a new area of cosmology , a Creationist Cosmology . I hope that this helps clear up this little problem regarding `` Starlight and Time `` . Got to go , Matt ."
"It is a good christian site that explains that there are lots of problems with Dr Russell Humphreys ' hypothesis ."
"But I just ca n't help but feel that they mis-interpreted several lines and are using some straw man attacks ."