"Biomorphs are an embarrassing attempt to explain just how a complex structure such as an eye might come about by gradual mutations , except they only do this by fooling you into believing the program mimics a natural possibility - when it ca n't , not when you are running the program and interfering at will ."
"no they are not . you quote a web site that is not dawkin 's interpretations of biomorphs and suggest that the web site 's interpretation is what dawkins created biomorphs for . it is outlines very clearly in `` the blind watchmaker `` as to what limitations should be put on the biomorphs when comparing them to real life . again i say to reclaim integrity admit that dawkins never suggested that biomorphs should be considered as a model for evolution or natural selection , and there was only one main point to be taken from them ( small mutations are more likely to produce benefits than large mutations ) ."
"except they only do this by fooling you into believing the program mimics a natural possibility"
"no they are not ."