"As derived from my exploratory campaign web site ... d ) But the real issue , is the fact that most often , the girl is left to fend for herself , and ends up alone when she commits a mortal sin by killing her un-born child , BUT WHAT DOES THE FATHER HAVE TO DO ? MORE OFTEN THAN NOT ... nothing ... the fathers are just walking away ... even though often , they made promises and assurances to the girl before the sex act , and yet , when conception occurs those men are no where to be found . Therefore I would propose fathering laws , to hold men responsible for abortions , by mandating that women who have abortions , can give the name of the man or boy , and that simple DNA testing can prove they are the father , and those hesitant fathers , should do three months of hard labor , for each abortion they cause , by their lack of commitment and affection . In this way , the girls , and women are not imprisoned , or punished , but men who choose not to use a condom , and made false promises , will pay for their part of the sin . Of course , the girl , must be willing to give the name , and if she is given anonymity , and protections , she can do so , or not , if she chooses to , or not to . After which , before the abortion , the Father could be contacted by some means and given notice , such that later , after the abortion he can not claim that he did not know , and as such , is guilty , if he allows the abortion to occur . THIS , will give the man , the chance to marry the girl , or be punished for his lack of affection and concern . But again , all of this is dependant on the girl , willingly giving the mans name , and he must actually be the father to be convicted . And as such , this law would directly prevent most abortions , by making the fathers responsible for them , as they SHOULD BE ! So , unless they actually want to have kids THIS LAW , will put a condom on all males . So , if the goal is to prevent abortions , the best and only real solution is to get the males to wear a condom , and or otherwise be willing support the child , or to MARRY THE GIRL ! ! ! ! This kind of law , would do just that ... and does not punish the female . -Mosheh Thezion"
"But you must realize that it is not always the males fault . For sometimes the girl just decides that the male should not wear a condom , and in some instances she insists that he goes without one . So , when she finally cries wolf , why should he be held responsible ? Because she chose not to ? Sure , he should have his wits about him , and think about it , but it 's not all of his fault . I do believe in having to support the girl , but I do n't believe in that having that all based upon a promise . Words are words , she should have made sure that he followed them up with something before uncrossing her legs . It 's not always his fault , that she could n't hold them . He just got caught in the cross fire . While I am pro-life , I do n't believe that he should HAVE TO MARRY THE GIRL ! I do n't think that one mistake should cause them both to be tied down . And then , what if the guy turns out to be a slime-ball ? An abuser , rapist , murderer or something ? Then you 're subjecting both the girl , and the baby to a life of constant danger . I do n't think that 's fair to anyone . All in all , I think that the concept of child support should be kept in tact . That seems to work sometimes . Either that , or we , the people , should work out some sort of chastity pact . Something that enables the girls to have children , but does not allow it possible while they are young . That or having them keep the big V. Something other than the ideas that you proposed , although I do like your child support concept . That should be kept around . However , I do think that the other laws are reckless without thought ."
"even though often , they made promises and assurances to the girl before the sex act"
"But you must realize that it is not always the males fault ."