"This post contains a perfectly simple explanation of why ToE is a sham along with a challenge to any Darwinist to prove me wrong . ToE is constructed on a fraud premise . This premise says that the fundamental unit of evolution is the gene . Whenever an evolutionist talks about Â “ evolutionÂ ” heÂ ’ s not talking about mere phenotypic change Â– heÂ ’ s talking about changes in genes . To a Darwinist , just because an animal changes phentoypically , or even if he passes these changes down to progeny does not mean that Â “ evolutionÂ ” has occurred . A fish could morph into a human , but if there are no changes in genes then this would not be considered `` evolution. `` The only way evolution can happen , by their own definition , is if there is a change in genetics . This premise , I suggest is a complete and total fraud ... and I will explain why now :"
"Well the premise you claim is not the core premise of evolution . Indeed Darwin never invoked genes at all . He did make the observation that some variability was clearly inherited ( but not all variability ) , he also observed that some variants survived and reproduced better than others . From this he concluded that natural selection operated to change the heritable traits exhibited by populations , and extended this to resulting in large changes over long times . Changes sufficient to result in new species which were reproductively isolated or nearly so . To an actual Darwinist genes did not enter the theory at all - they were not known at the time except to an obscure Monk who published in a less than prominent journal ! As to a fish morphing into a human without any genetic alterations .... Produce a case where that has happened and we can discuss it in depth . Till then I will claim that such a transformation can not be accomplished without alteration of the underlying genome . I am most dubious that you have any such example at hand ."
"perfectly simple explanation morph into a human"
"observation that some variability Changes sufficient to result"