"How is it that gay marriage recognition is an example of `` equality `` rather than a special right ? You already have the very same right to marry and opposite-sex person right now , as anyone else in this country . The problem is that you want a right over and above that -- special rights ."
"Because homosexuals are n't attracted to members of the opposite sex , so it 's pointless . In order to have a right , you have to have a legimimate way in which you can exercize that equal right . That 's not possible with hetero-only marriages . There is no special right , it 's equalizing it for biological concerns . Saying homosexuals can get married , but only to heterosexuals is like saying that they HAVE the right , but they have to go against their biological/mental state in order to exercize that . That 's unreasonable . Of course , prior to this debate , Blacks COULD get married , but only proper marriage was between members of the same race . They have the same , equal rights !"
"How is it that gay marriage recognition is an example of `` equality `` rather than a special right ? you want a right over and above that -- special rights ."
"homosexuals are n't attracted to members of the opposite sex you have to have a legimimate way in which you can exercize that equal right . That 's not possible with hetero-only marriages There is no special right , it 's equalizing it for biological concerns"