"By the way .... it 's not 99 % , as the article states , it 's 94 % http : //www.sciam.com/article.cfm ? cha ... A795436FEF8039"
"The first article is from 2002 and the second one is from 2006 , molecular genetics changed massively over that period of time with the completition of the human genome project and the development of new technology . What they would be looking at and comparing would have changed drastically as well , from just the genes in the first case ( the 99 % figure ) and everything in the second ( 94 % ) ."
"By the way .... it 's not 99 % , as the article states , it 's 94 %"
"What they would be looking at and comparing would have changed drastically as well , from just the genes in the first case ( the 99 % figure ) and everything in the second ( 94 % ) ."