"Evolutionists often claim Â “ Evolutionary biology has moved past DarwinÂ ’ s modelÂ ” but they never specify what it has Â “ moved toÂ ” . Â “ Natural selectionÂ ” doing some mysterious thing to a collection of genomic accidentsÂ ” is the only materialist explanation IÂ ’ ve heard for the origin of biological novelty . ( How could Â “ natural selectionÂ ” ( premature death ) , possibly create anything ? Â “ Natural selectionÂ ” can only select that which is already created , and RM & amp ; NS is the only detailed materialistic explanation IÂ ’ ve heard suggested for such creation . All other explanations include some form of intelligent , purposeful organization . If that organizing intelligence is internal , that would make it no less no less intelligent . Theism is compatible with the concept of a natural organizing intelligence , but theism is not the only alternative to materialism . For instance : All living systems have some ability to respond to stimuli , intelligently and purposefully . Inanimate objects do not . All living systems have some of our own ability to override automatic function in times of emergency , and make novel , fallible , spontaneous , subjective choices . Living systems have ability to monitor their own level of function , recognize weaknesses , and to explore novel responses . Furthermore if function is not immediately restored , intelligently organized biological systems have the ability to explore other possibilities immediately , without being removed from action by Â “ natural selectionÂ ” . If some people choose to call the creative intelligence of nature Â “ godÂ ” , I have no objection . As an agnostic , I donÂ ’ t speculate about the origin of mass , energy , electromagnetism , gravity , creative intelligence -- or anything else . Fanatical evangelical atheists would be the only people who feel obligated to do battle against the term Â “ intelligent designÂ ” . http : //30145.myauthorsie.com/"
"Well for one thing , Darwin did not know about genetics . He knew there was a mechanism , but did not know what that mechanism could be . As for everything else , you are making what is known as a 'straw man ' , also assertions without evidence , and just plain bad logic ."
"Evolutionary biology has moved past"
"Darwin did not know about genetics ."