"For this to be a consistent pro-choice argument , and assuming this to be a rightful interpretation and application of the 14th amendment there would be necessary conclusions . Those who hold this as an absolute belief must extend the right of a womanÂ ’ s right to choose the allocation of her bodily resources beyond pregnancy and into every instance of life . Therefore the pro-choice line of reasoning that says that a woman has the right to choose to abort because she does not wish do share her bodily resources can be extended to conclude also that a newborn infant can be aborted if a woman decides not to donate her bodily resource of nutrition and she has no access to formula ( no other factors involved ) ."
"That is an erroneous line of reasoning because it fails to take into account the myriad of other options open to a women after birth to remove the newborn from her care without any ill effects ( physically anyway ) . Killing in the instance of a newborn is not justified because of those other options open to her . By contrast , a pregnant woman has exactly one option open to her to remove the fetus from her care and that is abortion . I would contend that the same line of reasoning that allows for adoption can be used here , that no one must donate their resources to a dependant . Your reasoning that a woman , using the same line of reasoning that pro-choice people employ , can withhold her bodily resources `` until the newborn dies `` as if that is equal to withholding bodily resources in pregnancy is faulty ."
"For this to be a consistent pro-choice argument , and assuming this to be a rightful interpretation and application of the 14th amendment belief must extend the right of a womanÂ ’ s right to choose the allocation of her bodily resources beyond pregnancy and into every instance of Therefore the pro-choice line of reasoning that says that a woman has the right to choose to abort because she does not wish do share her bodily resources can be extended to conclude also that a newborn infant can be aborted if a woman decides"
"That is an erroneous line of reasoning because it fails to take into account the myriad of other options open to a women ``"