"The ID movements form of ID states that there are `` large gaps `` in the theory of evolution that can only be explained by the presence of a supernatural designer . Behe is happy to think that it is the christian god ( like the rest of them ) , but they ar n't allowed to say that , because if they do , they violate that annoying ammendment ! The ID argument is not scientific , because it 's not falsifiable , and has no supporting evidence . The ID movement relies solely on LACK of evidence for evolution , which is complete bunk . Just because we do n't know yet , it does n't mean that godditit . ( Incedentally , most of Behe 's claims of `` Irreducible Complexity `` are already destroyed by science , as DamEtel will be more than happy to explain . )"
"That , of course , is the logical fallacy known as 'Personal incredibility `` . The concept he promoted of `` irreducilble complex `` has been shown to be devoid of any meaning . All example he showed of 'gaps ' in systems he proclaimed to be 'irredibly complex ' have been shown to be reducible . Some were even found to be reducible even BEFORE his book `` Darwin 's black box ' was published . Those gaps in knowledge were filled in . What Behe was basiclaly saying is 'Gosh , we do n't know , it must have been God ' . We found out . God retreats . Yes , there are unknowns , and probably always will be . But our ignornace is not evidence of an intelligent designer . To promote an intelligent designer as a scientific theory , you have to have evidence FOR an intellient designer , rather than gaps in the knowlege of how biochemical systems formed . Believing in a God is fine , but it is n't science ."
"The ID movements form of ID states that there are `` large gaps `` in the theory of evolution that can only be explained by the presence of a supernatural designer ."
"of course , is the logical fallacy known as 'Personal incredibility `` . The concept he promoted of `` irreducilble complex"