"The `` evidence for the answer `` is the original evidence ! As you say , the observation was designs in plants and animals . How do you get design ? The only valid hypothesis was `` plants and animals were manufactured `` . IOW , there was a Designer . Now , the attributes of that Designer were such that the only possible entity that could fulfill them was deity . Deity was the only entity with the power and knowledge necessary to manufacture plants and animals ."
"So you 're just ignoring the counters I provided above ? Do you think they are irrational ? How are they any more irrational than basing an argument on the premise that `` something is designed `` when you have no basis for concluding that something is designed ?"
"The `` evidence for the answer `` is the original evidence ! As you say , the observation was designs in plants and animals"
"How are they any more irrational than basing an argument on the premise that `` something is designed `` when you have no basis for concluding that something is designed ?"