"the questions were not actually questions , but demands . Only projects one type of response . One we try to stay away from here at this forum ."
"okay ... maybe he was a little pushy , but it made me wonder about this issue . I looked at some of the links presented by creationists ; a book that attacks evolutionary biology by an electrical engineer , and a long rant about a false dichotomy established by evolutionists where they will reject any theory that does n't correspond to a philosophy of naturalism . The latter ( http : //www.trueorigin.org/creatheory.asp ) actually presented one aspect of a theory of creation . That being that all creatures started off with all the genetic information they needed and that observed change in animals is a degredation of information . This runs counter to evolutionary theory that simple unicellular organisms with simple DNA eventually became more complex . This is actually a decent claim , in the sense that it is a model that can be examined ... and quickly thrown out for obvious reasons ( antibiotic resistance , why are all creatures on earth so similar in genetic makeup ) I was wondering if anyone could bolster this claim or present another theory of creation . Really , unless some kind of theory is presented , all you are doing is bashing evolution . I can bash the laws of motion too ( not well , though ) but it does n't disprove them . Perhaps I 'm a little pushy too , but I find it annoying when truth is replaced with ... other things ."
"the questions were not actually questions , but demands ."
"maybe he was a little pushy , but it made me wonder about this issue ."