"It becomes more and more clear why atheists are comfortable with theistic evolution . If there was no Adam , there was no original sin , and no genealogy as described in the book of Genesis , only monkeys . Except for his amazing exception to science in the virgin birth of Jesus , he seems to allow evolutionistic pronouncements to have priority over Biblical statements . Then ALL the basics of Christianity , the nature of God and central New Testament teachings , including the way the sinner Adam ( one man ) and the Savior Jesus ( one man ) are linked together in Romans 5 , 16-18 , are trivialized just the way atheists love . No wonder they 're so comfortable with theistic evolution !"
"Actually , you could probably make your point better if you referred to a `` theistic evolutionist `` who rejected all creation stories ( and other history ) in the bible . As for your point itself , it is fairly correct ( in my opinion ) . Theistic evolution makes no assertions that contradict either evolutionary theory or the teachings of the bible ( morals , etc. ) . This presents no problems for atheistic evolutionists ."
"It becomes more and more clear why atheists are comfortable with theistic evolution . If there was no Adam , there was no original sin , and no genealogy as described in the book of Genesis , only monkeys No wonder they 're so comfortable with theistic evolution !"
"Actually you could probably make your point better if you referred to a `` theistic evolutionist `` As for your point itself , it is fairly correct Theistic evolution makes no assertions that contradict either evolutionary theory or the teachings of the bible"