"Perhaps an analogy . Lets say for the sake of the argument you do not smoke or drink ( personally against it , for whatever reason ) . However , you believe others should have the right to drink and smoke if they so choose . So , you are personally against drinking and smoking but you are `` pro-choice `` in that regard ( meaning you believe every person should make that determination for themselves ) . Pro-life would be : You do n't drink and smoke ( morally against it perhaps ) and you are going to make sure that no one else is able to either ."
"In your analogy I would say they are confusing too . I do n't smoke however it is not because I am against smoking it is because I do n't wan na do it eventhough I do n't think it is `` wrong `` . This is a far cry from saying you think something is wrong yet support others doing it if they want to ."
"However , you believe others should have the right to drink and smoke if they so choose ."
"In your analogy I would say they are confusing too ."