"First of all , it 's not a precedent . this is the seventh or eighth state where a higher court has found anti-gay discrimination in marriage unconstitutional . Secondly , when so many rulings go in this direction , it can hardly be called `` lawlessness `` . It 's a call for lawful , constitutional interpretation of statutes . It takes extraordinary intellectual dishonesty to pretend there is some `` agenda `` at work . These decisions are the consequence of two things : our long history of rationally applying those silly words about equality that folks smarter than this generation of politicians put in the Constitution AND a long-term correction of the misunderstandings of what homosexuality IS and what its consequences are . I know you do n't personally believe it , but there is nothing wrong with us ."
"Hey , laws are just laws , they can be overturned by any activist judge . So what is there about marriage which is absolute ? If nothing , then anyone can marry anyone or anything , its just the whim of a judge which decides . That is where we are heading , and heading fast . These laws stop them for now . But even five years ago , no one would have believed that same-sex marriage could be legislated over the objections of the voters . The gay lobby argues that all love should be celebrated and marriage allowed , tradition notwithstanding . So , the next logical step is that a group of people are being discriminated against , or a human/pet couple is being discriminated against , and the rot spreads ."
"this is the seventh or eighth state where a higher court has found anti-gay discrimination in marriage unconstitutional ."
"So , the next logical step is that a group of people are being discriminated against , or a human/pet couple is being discriminated against"