"BWWWWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! Are you trying to be deceptive or is it that you really did n't understand what you read ? It 's really pretty simple . The first link does not suggest that man arose in China . It is a discussion of a primate fossil . While humans are primates , all primates are not necessarily humans . The article discusses a primate fossil , the oldest yet discovered . It does not claim that mankind arose in China ."
"Can you not understand `` Our Primate Ancestors `` arose in China . The article suggests that previous theories were Afro-centric . '' Could it be that the entire story of primate and human evolution was like watching the movie `` Out of Africa `` over and over , with every major transition in primate evolution occurring on that continent ? `` Are you using 'ancestral with the spin that ancestor may not be anything other than archaic ? Or are you suggesting that they arose in China , then moved back to Africa ? Because the article says `` Carnegie palaeontologist Chris Beard tells how he made the scientific and political choices governing his selection of fossil research sites , and what it 's like to discover a very early rung on the ladder of human evolution. `` Which suggests that they were an actual ancestor . By the way , you do the same bwaahhaa as Iamthetruth . An indication of the level of which you wish to 'discuss ' things . ( Could it be that you have two IDs on this post ? ) . Sorry if that seems ad hominem , but it 's less so that your remarks ."
"does not in China , primate fossil , yet discovered"
"Our Primate Ancestors `` Afro-centric '' , scientific and political choices research sites ,"