"The ID movements form of ID states that there are `` large gaps `` in the theory of evolution that can only be explained by the presence of a supernatural designer . Behe is happy to think that it is the christian god ( like the rest of them ) , but they ar n't allowed to say that , because if they do , they violate that annoying ammendment !"
"So if I understand this correctly , we should n't believe evolution because it has gaps , but we should believe ID even though no one will/can say when the design happened , where it happened , what it was , or who the intelligence was ? Is that about right ? Seems to me the ID is nothing but gaps . Whenever I push an IDer for details of their claims , all I get is an anti-evolution position . Not even IDers seem to be able to say why ID should be considered correct ."
"ID movements form of ID states that there are `` large gaps ``"
"the ID is nothing but gaps"