"Both are matters of faith . To believe that there is no logic in seeing the evidence that way is saying Darwin , Crick and Gould were not logical . They choose to believe in evolution but they all saw the overwhelming evidence for design ."
"i like this . lets assume that both are mattes of faith , in that there is the unknown element in both cases ( which there is ) . the only thing left is which fits reality best the evidence that supports creation is a book written by some middle-east religiously biased men about 4000 years ago . nothing in this book can be replicated or observed , and they defy observable reality the evidence that supprts the theory of evolution is the observed reality that dna mutates , species that adapt to their environment survive , fossils exist , several aging mechanisms date the planet in the billions of years , and life forms in the millions , and so on . so , do we believe our own eyes , or what a very very old dtory tells us we should believe . thats what it really comes down to , all other things being equal"
"Both are matters of faith . To believe that there is no logic in seeing the evidence that way is saying Darwin , Crick and Gould were not logical ."
"lets assume that both are mattes of faith , in that there is the unknown element in both cases"