"Faith by definition is a belief without evidence ."
"yes . But then you throw in `` reasoned faith `` . But then you are making up terms that try to show faith as reason . What is reasoned faith ? If reasoned faith is the same as `` reason `` , then fine , you are n't using faith . If it 's faith , belief without evidence , then your evidence is your faith , and thus , it 's circular . If your faith is even part of your `` evidence `` or `` reason `` for belief , then logically the entire claim is arrived at through circular reasoning . You can use both all you like , I 'm just letting you know it 's fallacy to claim faith as evidence , which you do . If you do not , then you are using reason , and not faith , and we do n't need to continue because I see no fallacy in using evidence to back your claim . Enjoy . I found this as well , maybe it will be worded in such a way that you understand , since you seem to reject my arguments based on my name . http : //rous.redbarn.org/objectivism/ ... /answers2.html"
"Faith by definition is a belief without evidence ."
"What is reasoned faith ? If reasoned faith is the same as `` reason `` , then fine , you are n't using faith"