"I think there is something wrong with Premse One . It translates into English as `` If God exists , then he exists in all possible worlds. `` No logical rule justifies this statement . It is equally foolish to say that `` If England exists , then it exists in all possible worlds. `` But clearly , England does not exist in the possible world where Earth never formed ."
"the reason why premise 1 can logically stand is that God is first of all defined as the `` greatest possible being `` . no matter what reality we are considering , such a thing as the greatest possible being in that relity must exist . '' greatest `` is a superlative , compared to all other beings that exist its like `` the oldest man alive `` . no matter what scenario , such a person as the oldest man alive will always exist , therefore such a man ( that fits that definition ) will have a necessary existence"
"think there is something wrong with Premse One No logical rule justifies this statement"
"why premise 1 can logically stand is that God is first of all defined as the `` greatest possible being `` . a thing as the greatest possible being in that relity must exist"