"I ascribed potential motivations to the author of the article because I believe it is useful to consider where one is coming from . I did not write that the author explicitly wrote that no God exits , only that he suggests it . I did not write that the author of the article explicitly stated that evolution disproves God 's existence , only that it implies this . etc ."
"So in order to discuss an article you made up a bunch of stuff that was n't in the article , implied it was in the article , and failed to discuss anything that was actually in the article . I see . Will this be a one time thing , or is this the sort of thing we should expect from you on a regular basis ? Just wondering ."
"I ascribed potential motivations to the author of the article because I believe it is useful to consider where one is coming from"
"So in order to discuss an article you made up a bunch of stuff that was n't in the article ,"