"Well lets speculate about how many possible explanations we could concoct if left to supposition . I 'm talking about the only two explanations for the origins of life that have ever been entertained as viable empirically testable concepts in modern science ."
"God is not a testable , valid theory for being and origin . It fails the falisfiablily AND verificationism criteria -- quite badly . It 's also highly subjective . Creationism is n't even a peer reviewed , promulgated theory in any credible community . It would n't , and does n't , last 5 minutes against logic or science . Creationism = continual propagation of the same cut-paste arguments which have been refuted day in and day out , but not heeded . Creationism IS N'T a powerful force -- it 's fraudulant repetition ."
"I 'm talking about the only two explanations for the origins of life that have ever been entertained as viable empirically testable concepts in modern science ."
"God is not a testable , valid theory for being and origin . It fails the falisfiablily AND verificationism criteria -- quite badly ."