"Because there IS no evidence against creationism ."
"Actually , there is no evidence to support creationism , which is based on the mythology of bronze age , nomadic herdsmen . Thus , the creationism v. evolution debate becomes an effort by creationists to discredit evolution rather than an effort to offer evidence for creationism . The reason is simple - there is no evidence that supports creationism . On the other hand , it is intentional ignorance to claim that the earth is only 6,000 years old , that there was a universal flood about 4500 years ago , or that the millions of species in the world today evolved from a few thousand species at most at rates no evolutionary biologist would even consider possible . Creationists deny evolution and then offer hyperevolution when they realize that their position is impossible ."
"Because there IS no evidence against creationism ."
"Actually , there is no evidence to support creationism , which is based on the mythology of bronze age , nomadic herdsmen . Thus , the creationism v. evolution debate becomes an effort by creationists to discredit evolution rather than an effort to offer evidence for creationism . there is no evidence that supports creationism . Creationists deny evolution and then offer hyperevolution when they realize that their position is impossible ."