"Uh oh . Cash is n't asking for just any kind of evidence , but convincing evidence . We automatically lose because `` convincing `` evidence is already defined by Cash as something we are unable to present ."
"Got that right . Yankeefanwill refuse to define what he means as it allows him to reject everything that proves we are right . Notice he does n't define what a new body part means . Notice his reply to Symbiote . He 's not interested in the real definition of evolution and how it works . He 's attempting to 'refute ' evolution based on his own strawman . It 's a classic creationist tactic . Never discuss honestly the issue but attempt through dishonest methods to refute evolution . Our failure to meet yankeefan 's strawman criteria will only prove to rational people that his strawman is poorly designed . But to an avid creationist who has been annihilated on another board over and over again , it will feed his ideology that his evidence free belief is valid . Of course it 's still a false dichotomy , but logic , reason and facts are not found in YEC creationism ."
"something we are unable to present ."
"refuse to define what he means as it allows him to reject everything that proves we are right ."