"* * Apart from the fact that this claim is utterly unsupported empirically , and is so nebulous as to be fundamentally vacuous , what is there in the article that prompts kronus to say such a thing ? Apparently kronus took this as his cue -- `` To investigate whether there was any genetic basis for the effect , the research group examined the expression levels of about 9000 genes in the brain of the chickens . In birds exposed to stress , there was a number of genes where the expression was either increased or decreased , and the same genes were similarly affected in the offspring. `` N.B. -- -The 'genes ' DID NOT change . The 'genes ' in the brain did not mutate . So there goes RMNS darwinism as an explanation for evolved traits in the offspring , right from the jump ."
"So you do n't have genes in your body that are n't activated ? Aka my father has blue eyes and my mother brown eyes . I have 1 blue eye gene in my body yet I do n't have 1 blue eye and 1 brown eye . But 2 brown eyes . So it 's obviously not active . ( ok bad example ) Do n't know the exact name for it . But do n't rabbits have a genetic response hard coded . As every animal . That when they are being chased that they make irratic maneuvres . He says that the chickens had genes that had some hardcoded information about how to respond to certain conditions . They got activated in them . And the same information was passed to the children . So they do n't come out all big eyed and is mister big teeth my uncle ?"
"So there goes RMNS darwinism as an explanation for evolved traits in the offspring , right from the jump ."
"So you do n't have genes in your body that are n't activated ?"