"Okay , and you , of course , are n't going to be lazy . So , seeing how you started this thread , would you please explain to us what your point is ?"
"`` It is our contention that if 'random ' [ chance ] is given a serious and crucial interpretation from a probabilistic point of view , the randomness postulate is highly implausible and that an adequate scientific theory of evolution must await the discovery and elucidation of new natural laws , physical , chemical and biological. `` quoted from above . It would help if you read the post ."
"are n't going to be lazy . started this thread would you please explain to us what your point is ?"
"that if 'random ' [ chance ] is given a serious and crucial interpretation from a probabilistic point of view , randomness postulate is highly implausible an adequate scientific theory of evolution must await elucidation of new natural laws , physical , chemical and ."