"It 's just the same flip flopping over and over . Depending on the argument , `` science does n't exclude the divine `` , { then switcharoo } , `` science proves there is no divine. `` Just depends on the setting of the argument . ( you do have your copy of Victor Stenger 's book ; God - The failed Hypothesis / how science shows that God does not exist , do n't you ?"
"I 'd love to see an explanation about how the study of the natural world disproves the existence of all Deities . Especially the Deistic Gods . And I 'd love to see how science is suppose to disprove a being that is not bound by logic , reason or any laws . What science can do is disprove that God was directly responsible for this or that , the sun rising , the rain season , etc . Did you perhaps realize that many scientists are Buddhists because Buddhism which has beings that behave as Gods with such powers and exist partially within the natural and supernatural ? Or are you again assuming all religions do n't exist except for Christanity ?"
"It 's just the same flip flopping over and over . Depending on the argument , `` science does n't exclude the divine ``"
"I 'd love to see an explanation about how the study of the natural world disproves the existence of all are you again assuming all religions do n't exist except for Christanity ?"