"Originally posted by Crim RUT of proof ? This is how science operates . That does n't make the interpretations equally valid . Their days are not comparable with modern times . They did not have instantaneous spreading of information , equal technology , or nearly the same number of scientists ."
"And thats my point , science operates on it 's means of accesing valid mechanisms . That said , science will only allow what IT decides is `` valid `` , just like the church . Science defines what is valid and what is n't , just like the church . '' Instantaeneous `` comunication and large volumes of scientists does NOT make science any more right , it meerly increases the volume of stuff that they come up with . And again , your point brings back the arguement that when technology proggresses further we may still discover things which force science to re-write their books . Your view is purely subjective , even the evidence itself is opinion ."
"This is how science operates . That does n't make the interpretations equally valid ."
"science operates on it 's means of accesing valid mechanisms ."