"When Dr Richard Dawkins admits that `` Universal love and the welfare of the species as a whole simply do not make evolutionary sense , `` he is confirming that tere is no way - or it is very unlikely - to arrive at personal morality from an impersonal universe ."
"And I ask the question again . Have you read Dawkins ? Do you actually know what he says ? It 's a bit disengenuous to make such statements if you have n't read the books in question . How shall I say this ? You have been duped . Well - that 's going to be censored !"
"When Dr Richard Dawkins admits that `` Universal love and the welfare of the species as a whole simply do not make evolutionary sense ,"
"And I ask the question again . Have you read Dawkins ? Do you actually know what he says ? It 's a bit disengenuous to make such statements if you have n't read the books in question ."