"Those links have long been refuted http : //www.creationwiki.org/ ( Talk.Or ... dd_information http : //www.creationwiki.org/ ( Talk.Or ... e_new_features"
"`` refuted ? `` O'rly ? First they start off defining evolution as `` moleclues to man `` despite what evolution actually states . That further proves my point about strawman . They do n't discuss what evolution actually is . Furthermore , the whole notion that increasing capacity and adaption is not increasing complexity is insane . If I take a simple structure , modify it to form something more complex , is that not a change in complexity ? The whole idea that modifying DNA , changing it , removing and adding is n't actually changing anything is retarded . And they are separating macro from micro . That 's an invalid argument given that macro is nothing more then the aggregate of micro . A billion tiny changes makes a few large ones . The second idiotic article cites Natural genetic engineering . Despite there being absolutely no evidence of this occuring anywhere ."
"Those links have long been refuted http :"
"The whole idea that modifying DNA , changing it , removing and adding is n't actually changing anything is retarded"