"This post contains a perfectly simple explanation of why ToE is a sham along with a challenge to any Darwinist to prove me wrong . ToE is constructed on a fraud premise . This premise says that the fundamental unit of evolution is the gene . Whenever an evolutionist talks about Â “ evolutionÂ ” heÂ ’ s not talking about mere phenotypic change Â– heÂ ’ s talking about changes in genes . To a Darwinist , just because an animal changes phentoypically , or even if he passes these changes down to progeny does not mean that Â “ evolutionÂ ” has occurred . A fish could morph into a human , but if there are no changes in genes then this would not be considered `` evolution. `` The only way evolution can happen , by their own definition , is if there is a change in genetics . This premise , I suggest is a complete and total fraud ... and I will explain why now : LetÂ ’ s take humans and dogs , for example . When compared side-by-side , sure enough , humans may have an assortment of genes that dogs do not Â– and possibly the other way around . But just because humans may have certain genes that dogs do n't , does not mean that these genes cause the difference between humans and dogs . Of course , there are no Â “ dog genesÂ ” or Â “ human genes.Â ” But likewise there are no Â “ tongue genes , Â ” Â “ tail genesÂ ” or Â “ toenail genes.Â ” Parts are not translated genes . Thus , the assertion that new genes got created or that individual genes mutated over time to chnage one kind of animal into another is blatantly false and physically impossible . But it 's worse than that . As I said before , humans have a whole slew of genes Â– theoretically , at least -- that dogs ( or other animals ) donÂ ’ t have . But evolutionists still contend that these genetic differences cause the difference between the organisms ! ThatÂ ’ s why they analyze DNA with such scrutiny ! But did it ever dawn on them that studying genetics is a compete waste of time because of the real possibility that each dog or each human has the genes they have because of what they are ? Scientists have been telling us for decades that who or what we are is determined by what genes we have ... But theyÂ ’ ve got it backwards ! Instead , we have the genes we have because of who we are . A dog is n't a dog because he barks ; a dog barks because of what he is . Same with genes . This , of course , spells destructin to ToE because it means genetic evolution is a fraud . Evolution , thus , should not be a theory based on changes in genes , but a theory based on changes in traits . But scientists continue to mess around with genes and try to make the body do weird things by mutating them . They simply wonÂ ’ t give up because theyÂ ’ ve seen correlations between gene activity and various physiological responses . But hereÂ ’ s where theyÂ ’ re screwing everything up : When you were a kid did you ever stand on your head ? If so , did your face ever get red if you stayed upside down for a period of time ? If so , do you admit that it was the act of being upside down that caused the blood to rush to your head ? Or , do you have the audacity to claim that you were upside down because your face was red ? ThatÂ ’ s excactly what science is doing with genetics : theyÂ ’ ve got the audacity to claim that changes in genes ( the red face ) is causing the organsim to change physiologically ( go upside down . ) In reality , whatÂ ’ s happening is the organism is experiencing a new environment ( turning upside down ) and then the genes are responding in kind ( turning red ) . The only way you can prove this logic wrong is to do one of two things : 1 ) show me conclusively that mutations happen completely randomly and unoriented to environmental pressures . 2 ) show me that the same environmental pressures on genes will not produce the exact same physiological effects over and over and over . So there it is . Go for it ."
"So what this guy is saying is that he believes in natural selection but not evolution ?"
"a perfectly simple explanation of why ToE is a sham ToE is constructed on a fraud premise `` The only way you can prove this logic wrong is to do one of two things : 1 ) show me conclusively that mutations happen completely randomly and unoriented to environmental pressures . 2 ) show me that the same environmental pressures on genes will not produce the exact same physiological effects over and over and over . So there it is . Go for it ."
"this guy he believes in natural selection but not evolution ?"