"Therefore , I believe that God designed Finch brains to be able to subconsciously decipher when the environment changes and when a modified beak is needed . Likewise I believe God made it so peppered moths are able to modify their wing-patterns based on environment or background colors . This is no more unbelievable than the fact that a fish can change colors or that a snail can grow a bigger shell in the presence of predators . It all comes from the same creative Designer . And whatÂ ’ s funny is evolutionists Â– in one breath Â– will tell you how they do not deny plasticityÂ….yet in the next breath will tell you thatÂ ’ s not how finches and moths changed ! If these people were intellectually honest , they wouldnÂ ’ t talk out of both side of their mouths like thatÂ…they would admit the truth . But I no longer expect the truth out of atheists ."
"To be honest I 'm still not sure what your plasticity arguement is about . You seem to argue that animals can change shape and design like pokemon when the need arises . Now , my body , in the precence of foreign organisms , will create brand new protiens designed to kill the invaders , but this is a simple genetic process well understood by biologists . I still ask you to show me some study where an animal has been placed in an altered environment and makes a larger beak , grows extra limbs , etc . The problem with your fish and moth examples are growing larger shells or changing colors are abilities , not permanent changes , that are shared by the organism 's offspring . If a snail grew a large shell when there were many predators around , its offspring would not have the same large shells unless a similar predator threat existed . You 're arguements about plasticity essentially claim the story of how the elephant got its trunk is a valid evolutionary theory ."
"But I no longer expect the truth out of atheists ."
"You 're arguements about plasticity essentially claim the story of how the elephant got its trunk is a valid evolutionary theory ."