"Uh oh . Cash is n't asking for just any kind of evidence , but convincing evidence . We automatically lose because `` convincing `` evidence is already defined by Cash as something we are unable to present ."
"Got that right . Yankeefanwill refuse to define what he means as it allows him to reject everything that proves we are right . Notice he does n't define what a new body part means . Notice his reply to Symbiote . He 's not interested in the real definition of evolution and how it works . He 's attempting to 'refute ' evolution based on his own strawman . It 's a classic creationist tactic . Never discuss honestly the issue but attempt through dishonest methods to refute evolution . Our failure to meet yankeefan 's strawman criteria will only prove to rational people that his strawman is poorly designed . But to an avid creationist who has been annihilated on another board over and over again , it will feed his ideology that his evidence free belief is valid . Of course it 's still a false dichotomy , but logic , reason and facts are not found in YEC creationism ."
"Cash is n't asking for just any kind of evidence ,"
"Got that right"