"Evolution theory is not science at all , it is faith . Period . How can I conclude that ? Because an examination of the evidence shows that a bias/ ideology/ Godless belief system is the only real evidence for evolution theory :"
"Well , now , here 's the thing : A hypothesis of special creation of all things ( such as is described in the bible ) is inconsistent with the evidence we can elicit from living things today . For instance , there 's the amount of non-functional DNA we share with other creatures , in particular the other apes . With shared functional DNA , now , one could make a case for economy of design , but deliberately putting the same broken genes and garbage DNA into two entirely seperate species ? Then there 's the fact that some creatures have far better 'designed ' bits than others for no readily apparent reason . A good example is the octopus eye , whose retina is supplied with blood from the rear rather than the front , both anchoring the retina more securely ( no detached retina problems ) and avoiding the 'blind spot ' mammalian eyes possess . There 's no reason at all for a designer capable of making an octupus to use the inferior mammalian design . Then there 's the issue of vestigial features . Vestigial does n't necessarily mean 'useless ' , more properly it describes something that is 'overengineered ' for the purpose it currently serves , and often looks very much like a crippled version of a feature possessed by some other species . Ostrich wings , for example , may be useful for balancing when running , or in mating rituals , but they do n't need to be wings in order to serve those purposes . Their complex and delicate internal structure is clearly 'designed ' to allow flight , but their stunted development and the practical impossibility of such a big bird achieving self-powered flight make them a vestigial structure . Again , what rationale can be made for this being the work of a designer ? Then there 's the fossil record . Try as one might to twist the evidence to fit a biblical flood , it just wo n't go . Paleontologists have found spider tracks sandwiched in sandstone layers . Imagine , if you can , the delicate impressions of a spider 's footsteps surviving a deluge sufficient to suspend and deposit yards and yards of sand atop them . Hydrodynamic sorting of fossils , or burial order , does n't fit either , since it requires that we pretend all dinosaurs were large and slow moving ( they were n't ) and that all mammals are small , agile and fast-moving ( they are n't ) . On and on it goes . If we take evolution off the table completely and look at the evidence before us , we have no explanation that fits . Special creation simply does n't add up . With all creation myths falsified , what are we supposed to do ? Just pretend the history of life on earth does n't matter , or should be ignored ? Evolution is n't what you come up with when you apply atheist thinking . Evolution is what you come up with when you discount all the extant hypotheses that do n't fit the facts , be they religiously inspired or otherwise . Now , you may hold your hand up and complain that we 're not admitting the possibility of some kind of divine guiding hand steering or helping evolution . And that 's fair enough ; we generally do n't , for two different reasons : First , it does n't really add anything to the theory ; it does n't increase its power to explain what we see . So while you can of course choose to believe that 's what 's happening , it does n't have any scientific value . Secondly , there 's arguably some merit in the attitude that religion has had its chance and blown it . For thousands of years religions have claimed to bear upon their backs the infallible word of god . Now , if the bible had been saying all along - centuries before the technology existed to verify it - that god coaxed organisms into evolving from simpler organisms over millions of years , that would be compelling evidence that the bible was accurate and divinely inspired , since it would contain accurate predictions ( which no man could have made ) about what we should find when we look into our DNA or beneath the ground . But it does n't make those predictions . So why should we now pay attention when Intelligent Design evangelists do a 6000-year-too-late handbrake turn and invent a new faith-based explanation for the evidence ? After all , they have no divine mandate to do so - it 's the bible that 's supposedly the word of god ; they 're just making stuff up as they go along ."
"Evolution theory is not science at all , it is faith Because an examination of the evidence shows that a bias/"
"here 's the thing : A hypothesis of special creation of all things is inconsistent with the evidence"