"Your argument , I believe . The one I said does n't hold water . It appears to claim that the placing of restrictions upon items specifically designed for the killing of other human beings is somehow comparable to and a prelude for the banning of everyday items whose intended use is in no way connected to harm of others . Your title then equates this with a step towards a form of government in which one person is afforded executive , legislative and judiciary power over the country they control ."
"My article was about the banning of swords in Australia . Another step in the tyrranicle overstepping of power by a government over its people . Its called victim disarmament as the criminals that use guns , swords , cars , etc will still use these items to harm . Disarming the law abiding does nothing but flex the power of the fedgov sow ."
"Your argument , I believe ."
"My article was about the banning of swords in Australia"