"Here 's the relevant point of exposing how evolutionists dealt with defining the Coelacanth . Before evolutionists knew that living examples of this fish existed , they never even hesitated in taking the observable physical features it exhibited and thought nothing of creating a completely inaccurate and totally fictional biography of that fish 's evolutionary journey . They not only claimed that it crawled on the Sea bottom which proved it was an intermediary fish , but they made assumptions based on the fact that it birthed its young live rather than being an egg layer ."
"What is your evidence they did n't do this ? Remember , today 's Coelacanth is different ."
"of exposing how evolutionists dealt with defining the Coelacanth ."
"'s Coelacanth is different ."