"Is n't it wrong to violate women 's rights on a chance guess or ( at best ) a gut feeling or a belief in a perhaps completely mythical God ? We know she deserves rights ."
"Well , you are apparently admitting that I am correct in that we do not know for sure . What God has to do with it I do not know , because I did not bring that side of the debate up . My argument is purely of logic and philosophy . Consider for a second that you are wrong , and that abortion really is the killing of thousands and thousands of people . Then is abortion a woman 's right ? Of course not . No one has the right to take a life for the sake of convenience ( I 'm not talking about aborting because the mother 's life is at stake , for now just clear-cut convenience ) . So you commit a logical fallacy by assuming women have this right , because you assume that people are not being killed , while you provide zero hard evidence that this is the case . So , once again you are risking thousands and thousands of lives based on a hope ."
"Is n't it wrong to violate women 's rights"
"you are apparently admitting that I am correct in that we do not know for sure . What God has to do with it I do not know"