"So why does the slippery slope fallacy keep appearing despite a Supreme Court ruling that stands in the way of it becoming a reality , a decline in the number of gun laws , and little or no credible evidence to suggest that gun control advocates really do intend to ban all guns ?"
"Why ? Because people like you are still pushing gun bans regardless of the Heller ruling ! It does n't help your side 's argument when your people continually talk about `` reasonable `` and `` common sense gun regulations `` and their examples include bans on `` assault weapons `` , semi-automatic firearms , `` armor piercing ammunition `` , `` high capacity magazines `` , waiting periods , mental health evaluations , fingerprinting and photographing of gun owners , permits , nationwide registration , etc . DC is a fine example of this . After Heller dissolved their gun laws they basically said `` Fine ! If it ca n't be 100 % impossible to get a gun in DC then we 'll make it 99.9999999 % impossible ! `` They did this through the enactment of so-called `` emergency legislation `` which violates the Heller ruling in every conceivable way . DC even sold out their home rule to California in the sake of having gun control . Do n't you dare forget that DC denied a woman the ability to register her legally owned handgun because it 's color scheme was n't on a list of approved firearms . People like you are continually demanding that magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition be banned , saying that nobody has a legal use for them and they 're used exclusively for killing large groups of people , or turning animals into meat paste . Yet at the same time you claim that `` Saturday Night Specials `` as you call them , are the preferred choice of criminals , and yet not one of these `` Saturday Night Specials `` is capable of holding more than 7 rounds of ammunition in their magazine . People like you continually talk about gun violence , but your answer to the question always involves more laws that only affect the law-abiding . This suggests that you 're either too stupid to live , or you have an absolute distrust of anyone who is n't a government working dog . Which is it that you fit into , stupid or paranoid ? Why does the slippery slope argument prevail ? Because to you anti-gunners nothing is ever good enough ! There are more than enough laws regulating every possible facet of gun ownership and possession and punish anybody for committing a criminal act , and to you that 's just not good enough !"
"So why does the slippery slope fallacy keep appearing despite a Supreme Court ruling that stands in the way of it becoming a reality , a decline in the number of gun laws , and little or no credible evidence to suggest that gun control advocates really do intend to ban all guns ?"
"Why ? Because people like you are still pushing gun bans regardless of the Heller ruling ! ``"