"As we all have seen , creationists ca n't debate if their lives depended on it . Let 's examine their style 1 ) Refuse to comment upon scientific procedures 2 ) When faced with hard facts , move the argument to either a emotional ground , or question the personal , non-scientific beliefs of the evolution believer . 3 ) Lie like there is no tomorrow 4 ) Refuse to acknowledge anything they simply do n't like 5 ) When faced with a point they can not use # 2 on , ignore it completely like it does not exist 6 ) Classical ad-naeseum Can you think of any more ?"
"1 . ) Refusing to comment on scientific procedure means absolutely nothing . Maybe we do n't have anything to say . 2 . ) Testing your beliefs of your own scientific conclusions is not wrong . 3 . ) I do n't lie dude . 4 . ) Because we do n't give the response you would like is not wrong . 5 . ) Do n't think so . 6 . ) The only thing classical ad-naeseum is your own preconceived idea's of creationism and creationist . You do n't want to debate the issues like normal civil people , you just want try to make fools of creationists . Usually you 're the one who start 's the insulting . Your hatred is obivious and you 're open to nothing . Just good 'ol boys patting each other on the back . I know this probably does n't apply to everyone , there are some good guys out there ."
"As we all have seen , creationists ca n't debate if their lives depended on it ."
"Refusing to comment on scientific procedure means absolutely nothing ."