"Not true . I most certainly do apply EAM to all empirical observations of biological originality , just to see if it still applies . To date , it always has ."
"That 's because it 's not a falsifiable hypothesis . No matter what happens to an organism , you will always be able to say it happened on purpose . The observations you cherry-pick are those you use when attempting to prove that darwinian evolution can not work . So you ignore the countless studies where variation is unambiguously stochastic and focus on the very small number which seemed initially to show non-random mutation . You ignore the countless studies where adaptive mutations arise , and can be elevated by carcinogens , in the absence of any hypermutational organismic response , and focus only on those where it does occur ."
"Not true . I most certainly do apply EAM to all empirical observations of biological originality , just to see if it still applies ."
"That 's because it 's not a falsifiable hypothesis . No matter what happens to an organism , you will always be able to say it happened on purpose ."