"This would imply that things such as 'love ' are not 'true ' because they ca n't be measured by science ."
"Are you sure ? Love is an emotion . Do my cat and my dog love me ? They certainly have emotions . Tell you what . Why do n't you propose a method by which `` love `` can be quantified . That way there would be no question as to whether it was scientific or not . I think that it comes back to your constant insistance that science denies anything that is non-material just because science admits a lack of tools to study the topic . Put up or shut up . How can I measure the love for my wife and children and quantify it . Do I have a limited amount of love such that I love my wife less because I also love my children ? Do I love one child more ? How is this scientific ? Are you so unable to grasp the ideas expressed that you still have n't realized that naturalistic science does not deny that there are things that can not be measured by science . Science does not deny any god . Neither can it support a god ."
"This would imply that things such as 'love ' are not 'true ' because they ca n't be measured by science ."
"Are you sure ? Love is an emotion . Do my cat and my dog love me ? ``"