". But we know there is such a thing as legal precedent , and while your idea of people marrying pets is pretty silly , it is certainly NOT beyond the pale for marriage to be broadened to the point of including other arrangements as well like polygamy in some cases . The idea that gay marriage is not an example if simply broadening and moving marriage to a more wide-open concept for anything like many other examples is pretty ridiculous ."
"Actually polygamy is about one man marrying more than one woman . It is a heterosexual insitution . By your argument , it is traditional man/woman marriage that is the slippery slope to this `` broadening `` of marriage . You do not see any same-sex couples asking for a legal marriage for multiple partners . That is the realm of the straights , and all of them is mighty religious , as well ."
"But we know there is such a thing as legal precedent , and while your idea of people marrying pets is pretty silly ,"
"That is the realm of the straights , and all of them is mighty religious , as well ."