"Sorry to tell you this , but Behe already refuted the idea : Â “ The important question for us biochemists is , can symbiosis explain the origin of complex biochemical systems ? Clearly it can not . The essence of symbiosis is the joining of separate cells , or two separate systems , both of which are already functioning ... Because symbiosis starts with complex , already functioning systems it can not account for the fundamental biochemical systems we have discussed in this book.Â ” ( DarwinÂ ’ s Black Box , page189 )"
"And once again , is this a strong enough rebuttal to assert proof ? no , Behe assumes that a biochemical system that exists today can not have a precursor , or less complex state of existence . Clive did a good job of demolishing this notion with the mouse trap example he lin the debate thread ."
"Behe already refuted important question for us biochemists is , can symbiosis explain the origin of complex biochemical systems ? Clearly it can not . Because symbiosis starts with complex"
"is this a strong enough rebuttal to assert proof ? no Behe assumes less complex state of existence ."