"Its yet another definitional issue . Pure semantics not science . No thanks , I find myself becoming anti-semantic . And whats worse your link requires one be a member to even read the darn thing . But I can guess the nature of it ."
"* * Funny how you can dismiss something as 'just a matter of semantics ' when you admit you have n't even read it . Try this link -- http : //www.sciencedaily.com/releases ... 0611154001.htm"
"Pure semantics not , find myself becoming anti-semantic"
"how you can dismiss something as 'just a matter of semantics '"