"Next theyÂ ’ ve trashed GodÂ ’ s creation by diverting everyoneÂ ’ s attention . ItÂ ’ s a subtle move that not many people have noticed . But IÂ ’ ve noticed . What theyÂ ’ ve done is a clever sleight-of-hand move . Science no longer looks at animals . They no longer study how organisms interact within their environments . Instead theyÂ ’ ve turned everyoneÂ ’ s attention to genes , bacteria and virusesÂ….and this is because they know full-well that most people know nothing about these thingsÂ….Thus , they assume ( correctly , unfortunately ) that most people will just take their word for it ."
"The concept that science no longer looks at animals boggles my mind . My brother is a wildlife biology major in college meaning his primary focus is ...... looking at animals and their relationships to one another . It is somewhat understandable that your misconception could arise because molecular biology and genetic engineering are the latest crazes in science . The simple fact is most of the big breakthroughs when studying whole animals have been made . A similar turn has occured in chemistry . I could argue that chemists have subtly turned away from chemical reactions . All the research now is about electron orbitals and nano-structures . The reason for this is these are new fields that are relatively young and many scientists are interested in them . I myself am doing research on buckminster fullerenes . It does n't mean we 've abandoned good old fashioned reactions , we just have more field to play in now ."
"GodÂ ’ s creation by diverting everyoneÂ ’ s attention . ItÂ ’ s a subtle move that not many people have noticed . But IÂ ’ ve noticed . What theyÂ ’ ve done is a clever sleight-of-hand move ."
"The simple fact is most of the big breakthroughs when studying whole animals have been made ."