"If all life evolved from a common ancestor , then there should be countless instances of new body parts evolving . Body parts such as eyes , muscle , bone , etc . We have not seen one instance of a new body part evolving in a population in which it has not existed previously . Evolutionists will wave the magic `` time wand `` and simply claim that such a change could never be observed in a few decades . What about fruit flies ? One generation of fruit flies = around a day . Fruit flies were exposed to x rays to speed up mutation rates , we have observed the equivalent of millions of years ( in terms of human generations ) of super-accelerated mutation and .... no new body parts . Evolutionists will also list in steps how a new body part can arise . This is only plausible if each of those steps could be directly observed . If not , then it is nothing more than science fiction . Evolutionists have been searching for any direct evidence of the theory of evolution since the 1800 's . They are still looking ."
"in defense of the fruit fly , why would one evolve when one is already suited well to their environment ? what good does a 7th leg do ? and about the experiment itself - please , ALWAYS post references . who did the experiment ? when ? under what conditions ? how ? assuming you were correct about the experiment , were variables put in place such as habitat changes to reflect the timeline you speak of , a large variety of fruit flies to begin with , random mating , etc etc or did some people just shoot some x rays at a couple fruit flies , did some arithmetic which was probably wrong and called it that ? and im sorry , but there is mountains of direct evidence for evolution , you just need to go and look at it ."
"If all life evolved from a common ancestor , then there should be countless instances of new body parts evolving"
"why would one evolve when one is already suited well to their environment ?"