"What is shown very clearly from all of these scientific interpretation of the same evidence is that there are two ways to interpret it ."
"True . There 's the interpretation that assumes the outcome and then looks for evidence disregarding all that does n't agree . And then there is the interpretation that looks at the evidence and then makes conclusions based on that evidence . You abide to assume the outcome , look for evidence . And you have constantly asserted with absolutely no evidence , that your religious interpretation is correct . Essentially you are soapboxing as nothing you 've said has any empirical basis whatsoever ."
"these scientific interpretation of the same evidence is that there are two ways to interpret it"
"You abide to assume the outcome , look for evidence . And you have constantly asserted with absolutely no evidence , that your religious interpretation is correct ."