"I would call a fossil that had both reptillian and avian features a strange creature that God created at the beginning of time ."
"Exactly , there is absolutely no evidence that biologists could show you that would make you think , `` hey that would count of as transitional . Why ? Because you have already accepted your previous convictions and closed your mind to anything new . How about doing what Porky Pine asked and giving us your definition of a transitional form ? If you have spent any time at University , you should know that references older than 10 years should n't be used . Science has usually progressed sufficiently in this time , so that the information in the older articles/books , probably contains errors or invalid information . Scientists contradict each other all the time ? It 's the first step in finding correct answers . New hypotheses are proposed and tested , observations made etc and falsified ideas are discarded . It 's what makes it work ."
"I would call fossil that had both reptillian and avian features a strange creature that God created at the beginning of time"
"there is absolutely no evidence that biologists could show you that would make you think , `` hey that would count of as transitional"