"It 's just the same flip flopping over and over . Depending on the argument , `` science does n't exclude the divine `` , { then switcharoo } , `` science proves there is no divine. `` Just depends on the setting of the argument . ( you do have your copy of Victor Stenger 's book ; God - The failed Hypothesis / how science shows that God does not exist , do n't you ?"
"I 'd love to see an explanation about how the study of the natural world disproves the existence of all Deities . Especially the Deistic Gods . And I 'd love to see how science is suppose to disprove a being that is not bound by logic , reason or any laws . What science can do is disprove that God was directly responsible for this or that , the sun rising , the rain season , etc . Did you perhaps realize that many scientists are Buddhists because Buddhism which has beings that behave as Gods with such powers and exist partially within the natural and supernatural ? Or are you again assuming all religions do n't exist except for Christanity ?"
"you do have your copy of Victor Stenger 's book ; God - The failed Hypothesis / how science shows that God does not exist , do n't you ?"
"? Or are you again assuming all religions do n't exist except for Christanity ?"