"So , you consider a so called theory which allows a 10 billion year gap out of an alleged potential 10 to 20 billion year age for the occurrence to be the most credible theory ? And is actually supported by the evidence ? If they have any evidence , why the 10 billion year gap for wiggle room ? No wonder you accept evolution as a rational possibility ."
"Honest question Arch : where is the problem with a potential variance of 10 billion years ? I know this question may appear ridiculous to you but could you take the question in the spirit it was meant ?"
"theory allows a 10 billion year gap potential 10 to 20 billion year age for the occurrence to be the most credible theory ?"
"where is the problem with a potential variance of 10 billion years ?"