diff --git "a/README.md" "b/README.md" --- "a/README.md" +++ "b/README.md" @@ -39,277 +39,159 @@ widget: this does not apply to a portion of the gift for which performance has been completed.. ' -- source_sentence: In what forum would Iran sue Pakistan in for damages? According - to reports, Iran may claim $18 billion in damages from Pakistan for an unfinished - pipeline if Pakistan does not complete its part of it as agreed. What forum would - such a claim take place in? +- source_sentence: are there any legal systems in the world where the judiciary and + the legislature are the same? it's well known that the limited lawmaking power + that a judiciary has comes from interpretation of statutes but are there any systems + where the judiciary and the legislature are one and the same and have broad lawmaking + powers ? sentences: - - One of the biggest problems here is in proof of injury attributable to an individual... - With asbestos, you can prove that direct exposure in a certain instance caused - a long-term harm. Just because you were around asbestos doesn't mean you get lung - cancer, so if you don't actually suffer any harm (or any harm yet), you won't - get awarded damages. Similarly with lead, you have to prove both the exposure, - the entity which exposed you to it, and harm that you suffered. Just being around - a lead pipe or paint doesn't mean you get damages, you need to have suffered harm. - The problem with second-hand smoke is that you can be exposed to it from many - different sources. Any problems you have (lung cancer) would need to be proven - as a direct consequence of one specific (or prolonged) exposure. I could see this - working if a non-smoking spouse developed cancer from a smoking spouse being exposed - to it for years, but you can't just say "I walked by Joe Camel in the street while - he was smoking now I have cancer and it is his fault". So the issue becomes who - is responsible for your damages. You can't narrow it down to one smoker (or even - cigarette smoke, as lung cancer can develop from other sources), so just proving - that your cause-effect is directly related to smoke will be difficult. After that - you can't say one single person caused it (unless they forcefully locked you in - a room and chain-smoked for a year). So who do you sue? All of smoking society? - You might just as well sue God for putting those people on earth, really the only - recourse you would have is to sue the tobacco companies, the individual smokers - are not going to be held liable as a group. - - The settlement was a politically motivated act to provide de facto disaster relief - and express a moral apology in a cash that there is no plausible way that the - U.S. would lose if it litigated the case on the merits. The articulated basis - for making the payment would not survive a seriously argued dispositive motion - from the United States government, either on behalf of the U.S. government itself, - or against the federal law enforcement officials involved under Bivens. A complaint - making such a claim would barely survive a motion for a Rule 11 sanction for making - a frivolous claim if the government pushed the point, and then, only on the theory - that it advanced a good faith argument for change in the law, not on the theory - that it was supported by existing law. The Parkland case was considerably weaker - than the Charleston shooter of 2015 case even, because Parkland involved a discretionary - law enforcement decision, while Charleston arguably involved a non-discretionary - administrative matter (although the government probably could have won that case - as well). - - This is an interesting hypothetical. In this scenario, Country Z does not have - jurisdiction to enforce such a law on foreign nationals, unless Country Z has - an extradition treaty with Country A. Generally, however, these types of laws - would never be enforced as they are egregious abuses of government, and could - possibly be elevated to the International Court of Justice if Country Z actually - charges any individuals with such a crime. In these instances, however, war is - a very unlikely scenario, since this would often be expensive and any escalation - would most likely be small skirmishes that would lead to an eventual ceasefire, - with the encouragement of the international community, without the involvement - of UN Peacekeeping troops. - - You could probably hire a Pennsylvania lawyer to intervene in the case on your - behalf and file a motion to seal the evidence in the case, and there is a good - chance that it would be granted, and quite possibly, unopposed by the parties. - But, the fact that it has already been made available to the public on the Internet - could cause the court to deny your request on the grounds that it is futile to - do so. - - How close is such a statement corresponding with the reality? Legally, such language - is a meaningless statement of future intent that at best makes clear that the - person making the statement isn't waiving any of their legal rights. Certainly, - no infringer would have standing to sue if they failed to do so. Whether a joint - venture member or foreign reseller could sue the company for failing to enforce - its IP rights is another question that presents itself very differently and depends - upon much more than what the warning labels state, such as the language in the - joint partnership or reseller's agreement with the copyright owner. Also, in criminal - copyright violation cases, even if the copyright owner asks for the maximum possible - consequences, the U.S. Justice Department is under no obligation whatsoever to - go along with that request. Likewise, a judge has no obligation to impose the - maximum penalty allowed by law following a criminal conviction, even if the copyright - owner and the U.S. Justice Department both request a maximum sentence for someone - who pleas guilty or is convicted of the offense following a trial. In practice, - something like 98% of federal criminal cases, and a similar percentage of federal - civil cases, result in agreed resolutions which result in less severe penalties - than the maximum penalties allowed by law. This happens as a result of a mutual - agreement to resolve the case with a guilty plea, or a settlement agreement in - a civil case, or both. Also, in practice, none of these companies, nor the federal - government's prosecutors, have the resources to press anything but the most clear - and serious copyright violation cases, and cases that are valuable for P.R. purposes. - Anything else is essentially a random lottery from myriad cases that could have - been brought in order to counteract the argument (both political and legal) that - their copyright protections are empty and completely unenforced is a large part - of the cases to which the statutes would make it seem that they apply. Also, in - a case brought by a joint venture owner or reseller for failure to enforce a copyright - which causes the partner damages, presumably in some sort of breach of contract - or breach of fiduciary duty action, there would be no way to prove damages from - all of the non-enforcement, since enforcing every known infringement would not - be cost effective and would reduce the net profits of everyone involved. - - 'Sure Obama can sue Trump for defamation. Libel is a civil offense and committing - libel is not a part of Trump''s role as president. Regarding official acts, the - President is immune. But not for personal acts. See Is the US President immune - from civil lawsuits? But a libel action would be difficult to win; they''re both - public figures, which makes the defamation threshold higher: Public officials - and figures have a harder time proving defamation. The public has a right to criticize - the people who govern them, so the least protection from defamation is given to - public officials. When officials are accused of something that involves their - behavior in office, they have to prove all of the above elements of defamation - and they must also prove that the defendant acted with "actual malice." Defamation - Law Made Simple | Nolo.com The "actual malice" part is interesting: In the landmark - 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court .... acknowledged - that in public discussions -- especially about public figures like politicians - -- mistakes can be made. If those mistakes are "honestly made," the Court said, - they should be protected from defamation actions. The court made a rule that public - officials could sue for statements made about their public conduct only if the - statements were made with "actual malice." "Actual malice" means that the person - who made the statement knew it wasn''t true, or didn''t care whether it was true - or not and was reckless with the truth -- for example, when someone has doubts - about the truth of a statement but does not bother to check further before publishing - it. (same link above) Could malice be proved? Was Trump reckless with the truth? - Could be. But would Obama sue? What''s the cost/benefit analysis to him and his - legacy, politically and personally? Trump was taking a political or personal risk - - or he''s being stupid - with such accusations, since he may feel invulnerable. - He has sued and been sued and settled many times: see Legal affairs of Donald - Trump I think both would not want to be in court; because once in court, they - (and their lawyers) both have subpoena power and both would have to answer nearly - any question put to them about their public (and possibly private; but not official) - lives. Trump has interestingly enough talked about "opening up the libel laws" - so he can more easily sue people. But if he did that, it cuts both ways: he would - be easier to take to court. See Can Libel Laws Be Changed Under Trump? In my opinion, - Obama is much better off ignoring Trump and letting the FBI, DOJ, Congress and - the Intel Community do their jobs - have the facts fall where they may - and and - not become a right-wing talk radio subject for the rest of his life, as well as - risk being deposed himself in court. Edit 3/21/17: From a timely piece in The - New Yorker: http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-the-first-amendment-applies-to-trumps-presidency - While it is unlikely that former President Barack Obama would sue Trump for libel, - he very likely has a strong case. The First Amendment scholar Geoffrey Stone wrote - in the Chicago Sun-Times http://chicago.suntimes.com/opinion/opinion-trump-could-lose-lawsuit-for-libeling-obama/ - that “there seems no doubt that Trump’s statement was false, defamatory, and at - the very least made with reckless disregard for the truth.” That is the test for - damaging the reputation of a public figure or official: Trump either made his - assertions with knowledge of their falsity or with disregard of a high degree - of probability that they were false. Obama, Stone is confident, could prove that - Trump made his false charge, as the Supreme Court defined the standard, with “actual - malice.”' - - According to reports, one potential forum is the International Court of Arbitration. - All reports I see say that the agreement specifies that the forum will be an arbitration - forum. Whether it can be any arbitration forum or if it must be the ICC, or can - be selected from a list, depends on the specific wording of the Gas Sales and - Purchase Agreement of 2009, which I have not been able to find. - - Graffiti artists are routinely found financially liable for their work, but assertions - of copyright infringement by graffiti artists are vanishingly rare, so I don't - know if that has ever happened in that context. In many jurisdictions, filing - a lawsuit against someone waives any statute of limitations defense you may have - against counterclaims filed by the person you are suing in any related matter. - So, if that rule applies, a counterclaim for financial loss from graffiti could - be brought in a copyright infringement lawsuit, even though the statute of limitations - on the damages claim would otherwise have run. But, I don't know if such a rule - applies to copyright infringement claims filed in federal court. -- source_sentence: 'Q: is there some law or right thats says this is wrong. im 14 - and got my girlfriend pregnant her parents are saying she has to have an abortion - because having the baby can kill her and seriously hurt her and i looked it up - and if that was the case it would be a mandatory abortion and now they dont even - wanna tell if us shes gonna end up getting a abortion or keeping the baby there - had to be something that says they have to tell us something ' + - 'Short Answer Is it illegal for US citizens to travel to North Korea? Yes (but + see the "fine print" below). Long Answer There is: a US travel ban to + North Korea for American citizens, as of July 2017. Now, Americans wishing to + travel to North Korea must obtain a Special Validation Passport from the US Department + of State, only issued under very specific circumstances, such as for journalists + covering the region or for humanitarian aid workers. The Biden administration + extended the ban, initially established by the Trump administration, on traveling + to North Korea on a U.S. passport absent special approval: The ban makes it illegal + to use a U.S. passport for travel to, from or through North Korea, also known + as the Democratic People''s Republic of Korea, or the DPRK, unless the document + has been specially validated. Such validations are granted by the State Department + only in the case of compelling national interest. The U.S. State Department confirms + that this ban is still in place. It states that: Travel to, in, or through North + Korea on a U.S. passport without this special validation may justify revocation + of your passport for misuse under 22 C.F.R. § 51.62(a)(3) and may subject you + to felony prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 or other applicable laws. The maximum + criminal penalty if you use a U.S. passport to go to North Korea and then return + and a charged with a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1544 are quite serious. You could + be sent to prison for up to ten years for a first or second offense, or up to + fifteen years if you have two prior convictions under this statute, and/or fined, + even if you weren''t a terrorist or drug dealer, although the actual sentence + would probably be milder, if you were charged with a crime at all. The criminal + statute reads as follows (with the pertinent parts in bold): Whoever willfully + and knowingly uses, or attempts to use, any passport issued or designed for the + use of another; or Whoever willfully and knowingly uses or attempts to use any + passport in violation of the conditions or restrictions therein contained, or + of the rules prescribed pursuant to the laws regulating the issuance of passports; + or Whoever willfully and knowingly furnishes, disposes of, or delivers a passport + to any person, for use by another than the person for whose use it was originally + issued and designed— Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than + 25 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism + (as defined in section 2331 of this title)), 20 years (if the offense was committed + to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929(a) of this title)), + 10 years (in the case of the first or second such offense, if the offense was + not committed to facilitate such an act of international terrorism or a drug trafficking + crime), or 15 years (in the case of any other offense), or both. There are also + many other North Korean sanctions (and keep in mind that North Korea is legally + an "enemy" of the United States with which the U.S. is officially still + at war and does not have diplomatic relations). The most recent of those, from + 2017, prohibits ships and aircraft owned by a "foreign person" which + have been in North Korean in the last 180 days from entering the United States. + The ban does not prohibit a dual citizen from traveling to North Korea on a passport + from the person''s other country of citizenship, nor does it prohibit U.S. citizens + from entering North Korea without using a passport (although entering North Korea + without a passport or visa probably violates North Korean law). Of course, North + Korea also regulates entry of people into North Korea under North Korean immigration + laws. I do not know whether or not it is legal under North Korean law for people + to enter it with a U.S. passport. But, given that the only U.S. citizen to enter + North Korea without a special U.S. visa authorizing the trip in the last seven + years was arrested immediately after crossing into North Korea this week, it would + appear that this is illegal under North Korean law as well.' + - Historically, this was true in the Icelandic Commonwealth in the Middle Ages, + and in some democratic Greek city-states in the classical era. Similarly, in non-democratic + feudal regimes, the lord or monarch was both the law giver and sitting in court + was also the arbiter of all disputes arising under the lord's own laws. In places + like Saudi Arabia where the monarchy's power is more than symbolic, the system + still works this way to a significant extent. The practical reality in most one + party Communist states is similar. In the United Kingdom, historically, the Appellate + committee of the House of Lords (staffed by a subset of aristocrats usually appointed + for life by the Prime Minister to the post) was the highest court of appeal of + other courts in the British Commonwealth (with the Judicial committee of the Privy + Council handling final appeals from outside Britain), and it was also a court + of original jurisdiction for certain criminal cases against other aristocrats + to satisfy the Magna Carta's notion that one is entitled to a jury of one's peers. + Top level general purpose legislatures rarely serve as courts at the highest level, + except in very isolated political matters. A good example of narrow quasi-judicial + legislative power is the power of the Congress in the U.S., to be the ultimate + judge for Congressional election disputes and of some Presidential election disputes. + Congress also has quasi-judicial jurisdiction over impeachments of government + employees whether or not they are elected, and over expulsions for cause of its + own members and over other ethical sanctions of its own members. Many other legislatures + have some sort of quansi-judicial impeachment and/or explusion power exercised + as a whole by by some committee within it. It is common in the United States for + administrative agencies, within their narrow area of competence to exercise both + quasi-legislative power to enact regulations with a broad mandate in a subject + area, and also to have quasi-judicial power in that same subject area. The Securities + and Exchange Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, the Internal Revenue + Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Merit System Protection + Board, for example, all operate in this fashion to some extent. Likewise, it is + very common at the local government level for a city council and its planning + board to carry out both legislative roles and quasi-judicial role when disputes + come up regarding its land use regulations. Similarly, school boards routinely + both establish employment regulations and other school rules, and serve in a quasi-judicial + role with respect employee discipline or termination, and with respect to student + discipline. This dual role is also common for the boards of other public institutions + like hospitals and state colleges, and for private non-profit organizations. A + recent example in that kind of situation is Colorado's State School Board which + both exercises legislative power over when charter schools (i.e. public schools + not under the direct supervision of any elected local school board) may be formed, + and has the ultimate and final judicial review role over decisions by local school + boards to grant or deny school charters. + - It isn't explicitly prohibited so long as the amount claimed is in the aggregate + less than $20,000. But, it would probably be better to file separately. First, + very simple single party, single transaction cases are what small claims court + is designed to do, and going against the flow often creates unforeseen confusion + for the judge in the Justice Court who isn't a sophisticated civil litigation + expert. The Justices of the Peace who preside over Justice Courts that handle + small claims cases in Texas often aren't and don't have to be lawyers or even + high school graduates. Second, if you sue as a group, and one of your group is + the lead person handling the case (and that person isn't a lawyer), the lead person + is at grave risk of being found to be practicing law without a license by taking + actions in a lawsuit on behalf of your fellow plaintiffs. +- source_sentence: 'Q: Myself & spouse have lived in home 27 years. If I file for + divorce will he be made to sell home in St Pete and split the. Home in his name + only. Do not trust him! ' sentences: - - A:This is awful. You need to contact the utility immediately to have service restored - in your own name. Deduct from rent what you must pay. Your landlord is prohibited - from doing this to force you out, it is in a statute, I believe Civil Code 1941.6, - or close to it. You need to retain an attorney immediately to get on this LL on - your behalf. Check here and do a google search. You may need to speak with several - before finding one who will assist. Contact your elderly neighbor to see if she - wants to be represented as well. LL are subject to strict provisions about how - to evict tenants, these "heirs" apparently do not appreciate this and think they - can do whatever they want. You are entitled to protection but it won't be quick - or easy. I recommend you contact several attorneys in your area that practice - this type of law, as soon as possible. Thank you for using Justia ask a lawyer. - - A:Even after the Dobbs decision, a woman has the right to choose. A minor woman - would need to work with her parents to obtain a timely abortion. If your girlfriend - chooses to have the baby, keeps the baby, and gives you information, you could - have the option of signing off on the baby's birth certificate to be designated - as the baby's father, or to file a timely declaration of paternity. Use protection/a - condom. Actions have consequences. If your girlfriend has the baby, she can file - a parentage action, seeking a DNA test if you've not voluntarily stepped up. If - you are the dad, you can be held accountable for 18 years of child support, plus - maintaining health insurance for the child, prenatal costs for the mom, costs - of birthing the baby, and splitting out the child's uninsured health care expenses. - Good luck to you. - - A:Under these facts no one is going to jail. If there is no order, there is no - arrears. If there is a pending case, the Court may award arrears, however, the - obligor will have an opportunity to pay back them back over time. Seeing the child - is a separate matter from whether one must pay support. The obligor should contact - an attorney who regularly practices family relations law in whatever county the - child resides, and file a motion to establish paternity, and parental rights and - responsibilities. - - A:Sorry, but your question should be directed to a fanily law or domestic relations - attorney. - - A:Your question involves Delaware law. You would need to contact attorneys in - Delaware for help with this. - - A:I looked online for what you are referencing, and I see a story regarding DeSantis - announcing that the Fla. Dept. of Law Enforcement arrested 20 people who allegedly - voted illegally because their voting rights were not restored, even though they - were allowed to register. (See, for example, https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2022/08/19/desantis-touted-their-arrest-but-ex-felons-say-they-werent-told-they-couldnt-vote/ - ). If all of the arrested individuals have the same story as the lady first mentioned - in the above news article, I'm guessing that they will likely have a good defense - of not having the intent to commit the crime, and hopefully will be found not - guilty or have their cases dismissed. But if you're asking if there's a law that - obligates the governor to inform the public that the arrested individuals have - the defense that they thought their rights were restored, the answer is no. The - government does need to do a much better job of getting the word out regarding - who is qualified to vote after a felony conviction and who is not, and on how - to seek restoration of rights. The government (State or local) should also provide - an instant background check that would allow for the registration office to reject - an application without subjecting the unqualified voter to arrest. Everyone should - talk to their State legislators, local elections officials and/or county/city - commissioners about this issue, as well as talk to private organizations concerned - with voting, such as the ACLU, NAACP, and League of Women Voters. - - A:Your question indicates that your sister is an adult, not a minor (under 18). - In cases when a person has not made an advanced medical directive, then Section - 54.1-2986 of the Virginia Code determines the procedure for making medical decisions - in the absence of an advanced medical directive. The priority for making decisions - starts with guardian, then spouse, then adult child, then parent, then adult sibling. - - A:In California, both parents have rights regarding their child, but these rights - need to be legally recognized and structured, especially in situations where there's - no established custody arrangement. Since paternity has been established and child - support set, the father does have certain legal rights concerning the child. However, - if there's no formal visitation or custody agreement in place, he doesn't have - the automatic right to take the child from you. Normally, custody and visitation - rights are determined through a court order. In the absence of such an order, - you retain physical custody of your child. If the father wishes to be involved - in the child's life, he can request the court to establish a formal visitation - or custody arrangement. This process will involve the court reviewing what's in - the best interest of the child and then making a decision accordingly. It's important - for you to understand your rights and the legal process in such situations. If - you're concerned about custody and visitation issues, it might be advisable to - consult with a family law attorney. They can provide guidance on how to proceed - and represent your interests in any legal actions related to custody and visitation. - Remember, the well-being of your child is paramount, and the court's primary focus - will be on ensuring their best interests are met in any custody or visitation - arrangements. -- source_sentence: how is my info used + - A:As long as the house is a marital asset, which it sounds like it is, the court + will order the equity to be divided as part of equitable distribution. You will + each have the opportunity to buy the other out or else the property will be sold. + Speak with a local family lawyer for more specific advice. + - A:Hi there, good evening. In federal cases, such as yours in the Central District + Court of California, once a case is e-filed, the documents, including the complaint + and summons, can typically be downloaded from PACER. This is a common practice + and allows for easy access to filed documents. A "conformed copy" of a document + is essentially a copy that includes all signatures and official stamps, making + it identical to the original. These copies are often required in situations where + you need to submit a document that is as valid as the original, such as for certain + legal or official proceedings. They ensure that the document you're using is a + true and complete representation of the original filed document. + - A:First off, they read him his rights once. Secondly, not reading your rights + does not mean not guilty automatically, If Miranda is violated it only suppresses + any statements made. He was not charged with underage drinking, curfew, truancy, + or running away. He was charged with a criminal offense, DUI. Time to lawyer up. + If he is convicted of DUI, he loses his license for a minimum of two years and + then must have a hearing with the Secretary of State. +- source_sentence: how private is this app? sentences: - - Provide personalized experiences - - ' In order to make your visits to our website and use of the services available - on or through our website as worthwhile as possible, Pepperplate may also collect - Personal Information about its visitors, but only when a visitor provides such - Personal Information to us in the process of ordering subscriptions, entering - contests or sweepstakes, signing up for our newsletter(s), using our "Feedback" - feature, registering with the website or using other services available on or - through our Website.' - - technical information, including the Internet protocol (IP) address used to connect - your computer to the Internet, your login information (when you sign in as a customer), - browser type and version, and the type of device used to access the Platform; - information about your visit, including the clickstream to, through and from our - Platform (including date and time), products you viewed or searched for, page - response times, length of visits to certain pages, page interaction information - (such as scrolling, clicks, and mouse-overs), and any phone number used to call - our customer service number. - - Such information will also be used, for example, to process your orders, respond - to your requests and inquiries and provide you with the services and features - offered on or through our Website. - - How Long Do We Retain Your Personal Data? - - If you choose to provide such information, during registration or otherwise, Khan - Academy will treat the information as Personal Information and will use it in - the ways described in this Privacy Policy. - - For example, we use HTTPS while information is being transmitted. - - You may request details of personal information which we hold about you under - the Data Protection Act 1998. -- source_sentence: what kind of data will tastemade collect? + - We will not use this information for anything other than providing the Service + for which the information was supplied. + - ), and College Board program participants may provide information regarding study + habits and test scores (e.g., the number of hours studied, modules or tests taken, + scores earned, etc. + - We share your information with Service Providers who process data on our behalf, + such as credit card processors and customer management systems. +- source_sentence: does this app may share my location anonymous? sentences: - - See Cookies and other technologies for more information on the use of cookies - and device identifiers related to the Services. - - ' profiling activity - purpose under par.' - - demographic information such as country, language, operating system and postcode - - For example, we may collect anonymous aggregated information about how users use - our services. - - to make suggestions and recommendations to you and other users of our Platform - about goods or services that may interest you or them. - - We will also collect your usage information of relevant apps on your mobile phone, - so that we can optimize the use experience of TouchPal Keyboard. - - What Choices and Access Do I Have? - - We will collect your SMS and the content published on Twitter and Facebook for - customized prediction, and we just collect such information or content for learning - purpose and it will not be uploaded to our server. + - You may opt out of certain ad targeting and retargeting services by visiting the + Digital Advertising Alliances opt-out page, or the Network Advertising Initiatives + opt-out page. + - 'Delivery of location services will involve reference to one or more of the following: + (a) the coordinates (latitude/longitude) of your location; (b) look-up of your + country of location by reference to your IP address against public sources; and/or + (c) your location settings on your Apple device or Android device, or similar + device identifier/settings.' + - We may collect usage information about your use of our Service, such as the number + of problems you have attempted, the number of videos you have viewed, and the + amount of time spent to complete a problem. datasets: - sentence-transformers/coliee - bwang0911/legal_qa_v1 @@ -354,10 +236,10 @@ model-index: value: 0.36 name: Cosine Accuracy@3 - type: cosine_accuracy@5 - value: 0.38 + value: 0.36 name: Cosine Accuracy@5 - type: cosine_accuracy@10 - value: 0.54 + value: 0.52 name: Cosine Accuracy@10 - type: cosine_precision@1 value: 0.32 @@ -369,28 +251,28 @@ model-index: value: 0.14 name: Cosine Precision@5 - type: cosine_precision@10 - value: 0.106 + value: 0.09799999999999998 name: Cosine Precision@10 - type: cosine_recall@1 - value: 0.10011421911421912 + value: 0.10344755244755245 name: Cosine Recall@1 - type: cosine_recall@3 value: 0.173986013986014 name: Cosine Recall@3 - type: cosine_recall@5 - value: 0.20522843822843825 + value: 0.19522843822843824 name: Cosine Recall@5 - type: cosine_recall@10 - value: 0.30841841491841493 + value: 0.28000932400932405 name: Cosine Recall@10 - type: cosine_ndcg@10 - value: 0.26821891394168423 + value: 0.2554010429460017 name: Cosine Ndcg@10 - type: cosine_mrr@10 - value: 0.36276984126984124 + value: 0.35526984126984135 name: Cosine Mrr@10 - type: cosine_map@100 - value: 0.23063036312378082 + value: 0.2279369510758354 name: Cosine Map@100 - task: type: information-retrieval @@ -400,49 +282,49 @@ model-index: type: mteb/AILA_statutes metrics: - type: cosine_accuracy@1 - value: 0.26 + value: 0.24 name: Cosine Accuracy@1 - type: cosine_accuracy@3 - value: 0.42 + value: 0.4 name: Cosine Accuracy@3 - type: cosine_accuracy@5 - value: 0.52 + value: 0.5 name: Cosine Accuracy@5 - type: cosine_accuracy@10 - value: 0.68 + value: 0.66 name: Cosine Accuracy@10 - type: cosine_precision@1 - value: 0.26 + value: 0.24 name: Cosine Precision@1 - type: cosine_precision@3 - value: 0.15999999999999998 + value: 0.15333333333333332 name: Cosine Precision@3 - type: cosine_precision@5 - value: 0.132 + value: 0.124 name: Cosine Precision@5 - type: cosine_precision@10 - value: 0.11 + value: 0.10399999999999998 name: Cosine Precision@10 - type: cosine_recall@1 - value: 0.06499999999999999 + value: 0.066 name: Cosine Recall@1 - type: cosine_recall@3 - value: 0.125 + value: 0.115 name: Cosine Recall@3 - type: cosine_recall@5 - value: 0.16399999999999998 + value: 0.15600000000000003 name: Cosine Recall@5 - type: cosine_recall@10 - value: 0.261 + value: 0.2506666666666667 name: Cosine Recall@10 - type: cosine_ndcg@10 - value: 0.22914031866900986 + value: 0.21795221118394462 name: Cosine Ndcg@10 - type: cosine_mrr@10 - value: 0.3726904761904762 + value: 0.34710317460317447 name: Cosine Mrr@10 - type: cosine_map@100 - value: 0.19673834325166786 + value: 0.1907807681666918 name: Cosine Map@100 - task: type: information-retrieval @@ -452,49 +334,49 @@ model-index: type: mteb/legalbench_consumer_contracts_qa metrics: - type: cosine_accuracy@1 - value: 0.45202020202020204 + value: 0.45454545454545453 name: Cosine Accuracy@1 - type: cosine_accuracy@3 - value: 0.6843434343434344 + value: 0.6944444444444444 name: Cosine Accuracy@3 - type: cosine_accuracy@5 - value: 0.7878787878787878 + value: 0.7828282828282829 name: Cosine Accuracy@5 - type: cosine_accuracy@10 - value: 0.8661616161616161 + value: 0.8787878787878788 name: Cosine Accuracy@10 - type: cosine_precision@1 - value: 0.45202020202020204 + value: 0.45454545454545453 name: Cosine Precision@1 - type: cosine_precision@3 - value: 0.2281144781144781 + value: 0.23148148148148145 name: Cosine Precision@3 - type: cosine_precision@5 - value: 0.15757575757575756 + value: 0.15656565656565652 name: Cosine Precision@5 - type: cosine_precision@10 - value: 0.0866161616161616 + value: 0.08787878787878788 name: Cosine Precision@10 - type: cosine_recall@1 - value: 0.45202020202020204 + value: 0.45454545454545453 name: Cosine Recall@1 - type: cosine_recall@3 - value: 0.6843434343434344 + value: 0.6944444444444444 name: Cosine Recall@3 - type: cosine_recall@5 - value: 0.7878787878787878 + value: 0.7828282828282829 name: Cosine Recall@5 - type: cosine_recall@10 - value: 0.8661616161616161 + value: 0.8787878787878788 name: Cosine Recall@10 - type: cosine_ndcg@10 - value: 0.6554316826573866 + value: 0.6629903557959665 name: Cosine Ndcg@10 - type: cosine_mrr@10 - value: 0.5881553631553632 + value: 0.5942259900593235 name: Cosine Mrr@10 - type: cosine_map@100 - value: 0.5945229817141628 + value: 0.5996552027282283 name: Cosine Map@100 - task: type: information-retrieval @@ -504,10 +386,10 @@ model-index: type: mteb/legalbench_corporate_lobbying metrics: - type: cosine_accuracy@1 - value: 0.7382352941176471 + value: 0.7588235294117647 name: Cosine Accuracy@1 - type: cosine_accuracy@3 - value: 0.8970588235294118 + value: 0.9029411764705882 name: Cosine Accuracy@3 - type: cosine_accuracy@5 value: 0.9294117647058824 @@ -516,10 +398,10 @@ model-index: value: 0.9647058823529412 name: Cosine Accuracy@10 - type: cosine_precision@1 - value: 0.7382352941176471 + value: 0.7588235294117647 name: Cosine Precision@1 - type: cosine_precision@3 - value: 0.29901960784313725 + value: 0.3009803921568628 name: Cosine Precision@3 - type: cosine_precision@5 value: 0.18588235294117644 @@ -528,10 +410,10 @@ model-index: value: 0.09647058823529411 name: Cosine Precision@10 - type: cosine_recall@1 - value: 0.7382352941176471 + value: 0.7588235294117647 name: Cosine Recall@1 - type: cosine_recall@3 - value: 0.8970588235294118 + value: 0.9029411764705882 name: Cosine Recall@3 - type: cosine_recall@5 value: 0.9294117647058824 @@ -540,13 +422,13 @@ model-index: value: 0.9647058823529412 name: Cosine Recall@10 - type: cosine_ndcg@10 - value: 0.8570656910918443 + value: 0.8685058033071409 name: Cosine Ndcg@10 - type: cosine_mrr@10 - value: 0.822012138188609 + value: 0.8369257703081232 name: Cosine Mrr@10 - type: cosine_map@100 - value: 0.8232073883316766 + value: 0.8383005473609861 name: Cosine Map@100 - task: type: information-retrieval @@ -556,49 +438,49 @@ model-index: type: mteb/legal_summarization metrics: - type: cosine_accuracy@1 - value: 0.49295774647887325 + value: 0.5 name: Cosine Accuracy@1 - type: cosine_accuracy@3 - value: 0.647887323943662 + value: 0.6549295774647887 name: Cosine Accuracy@3 - type: cosine_accuracy@5 - value: 0.7112676056338029 + value: 0.7288732394366197 name: Cosine Accuracy@5 - type: cosine_accuracy@10 - value: 0.795774647887324 + value: 0.8028169014084507 name: Cosine Accuracy@10 - type: cosine_precision@1 - value: 0.49295774647887325 + value: 0.5 name: Cosine Precision@1 - type: cosine_precision@3 - value: 0.23708920187793425 + value: 0.24295774647887325 name: Cosine Precision@3 - type: cosine_precision@5 - value: 0.1640845070422535 + value: 0.16901408450704225 name: Cosine Precision@5 - type: cosine_precision@10 - value: 0.09859154929577464 + value: 0.09929577464788732 name: Cosine Precision@10 - type: cosine_recall@1 - value: 0.437591076763612 + value: 0.4474502316931894 name: Cosine Recall@1 - type: cosine_recall@3 - value: 0.570583729650631 + value: 0.5799413907688555 name: Cosine Recall@3 - type: cosine_recall@5 - value: 0.6355626181330407 + value: 0.6543419608560453 name: Cosine Recall@5 - type: cosine_recall@10 - value: 0.7263897780623133 + value: 0.7329290134747881 name: Cosine Recall@10 - type: cosine_ndcg@10 - value: 0.5975871811338554 + value: 0.6075214960447544 name: Cosine Ndcg@10 - type: cosine_mrr@10 - value: 0.5847250167672702 + value: 0.5952380952380955 name: Cosine Mrr@10 - type: cosine_map@100 - value: 0.555669852845899 + value: 0.5669161422906482 name: Cosine Map@100 --- @@ -660,9 +542,9 @@ from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer model = SentenceTransformer("bwang0911/jev2-legal") # Run inference sentences = [ - 'what kind of data will tastemade collect?', - 'See Cookies and other technologies for more information on the use of cookies and device identifiers related to the Services.', - 'to make suggestions and recommendations to you and other users of our Platform about goods or services that may interest you or them.', + 'does this app may share my location anonymous?', + 'Delivery of location services will involve reference to one or more of the following: (a) the coordinates (latitude/longitude) of your location; (b) look-up of your country of location by reference to your IP address against public sources; and/or (c) your location settings on your Apple device or Android device, or similar device identifier/settings.', + 'We may collect usage information about your use of our Service, such as the number of problems you have attempted, the number of videos you have viewed, and the amount of time spent to complete a problem.', ] embeddings = model.encode(sentences) print(embeddings.shape) @@ -709,21 +591,21 @@ You can finetune this model on your own dataset. | Metric | mteb/AILA_casedocs | mteb/AILA_statutes | mteb/legalbench_consumer_contracts_qa | mteb/legalbench_corporate_lobbying | mteb/legal_summarization | |:--------------------|:-------------------|:-------------------|:--------------------------------------|:-----------------------------------|:-------------------------| -| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.452 | 0.7382 | 0.493 | -| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.6843 | 0.8971 | 0.6479 | -| cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.7879 | 0.9294 | 0.7113 | -| cosine_accuracy@10 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.8662 | 0.9647 | 0.7958 | -| cosine_precision@1 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.452 | 0.7382 | 0.493 | -| cosine_precision@3 | 0.2 | 0.16 | 0.2281 | 0.299 | 0.2371 | -| cosine_precision@5 | 0.14 | 0.132 | 0.1576 | 0.1859 | 0.1641 | -| cosine_precision@10 | 0.106 | 0.11 | 0.0866 | 0.0965 | 0.0986 | -| cosine_recall@1 | 0.1001 | 0.065 | 0.452 | 0.7382 | 0.4376 | -| cosine_recall@3 | 0.174 | 0.125 | 0.6843 | 0.8971 | 0.5706 | -| cosine_recall@5 | 0.2052 | 0.164 | 0.7879 | 0.9294 | 0.6356 | -| cosine_recall@10 | 0.3084 | 0.261 | 0.8662 | 0.9647 | 0.7264 | -| **cosine_ndcg@10** | **0.2682** | **0.2291** | **0.6554** | **0.8571** | **0.5976** | -| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.3628 | 0.3727 | 0.5882 | 0.822 | 0.5847 | -| cosine_map@100 | 0.2306 | 0.1967 | 0.5945 | 0.8232 | 0.5557 | +| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.4545 | 0.7588 | 0.5 | +| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.6944 | 0.9029 | 0.6549 | +| cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.36 | 0.5 | 0.7828 | 0.9294 | 0.7289 | +| cosine_accuracy@10 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.8788 | 0.9647 | 0.8028 | +| cosine_precision@1 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.4545 | 0.7588 | 0.5 | +| cosine_precision@3 | 0.2 | 0.1533 | 0.2315 | 0.301 | 0.243 | +| cosine_precision@5 | 0.14 | 0.124 | 0.1566 | 0.1859 | 0.169 | +| cosine_precision@10 | 0.098 | 0.104 | 0.0879 | 0.0965 | 0.0993 | +| cosine_recall@1 | 0.1034 | 0.066 | 0.4545 | 0.7588 | 0.4475 | +| cosine_recall@3 | 0.174 | 0.115 | 0.6944 | 0.9029 | 0.5799 | +| cosine_recall@5 | 0.1952 | 0.156 | 0.7828 | 0.9294 | 0.6543 | +| cosine_recall@10 | 0.28 | 0.2507 | 0.8788 | 0.9647 | 0.7329 | +| **cosine_ndcg@10** | **0.2554** | **0.218** | **0.663** | **0.8685** | **0.6075** | +| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.3553 | 0.3471 | 0.5942 | 0.8369 | 0.5952 | +| cosine_map@100 | 0.2279 | 0.1908 | 0.5997 | 0.8383 | 0.5669 |