---
language: en
license: apache-2.0
---
## Overview
Model included in a paper for modeling fine grained similarity between documents:
**Title**: "Multi-Vector Models with Textual Guidance for Fine-Grained Scientific Document Similarity"
**Authors**: Sheshera Mysore, Arman Cohan, Tom Hope
**Paper**: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08366
**Github**: https://github.com/allenai/aspire
**Note**: In the context of the paper, this model is referred to as `tsAspire` and represents the papers proposed multi-vector model for fine-grained scientific document similarity.
## Model Card
### Model description
This model is a BERT based multi-vector model trained for fine-grained similarity of biomedical scientific papers. This model inputs the title and abstract of a paper and represents a paper with a contextual sentence vectors obtained by averaging the token representations of individual sentences - the whole title and abstract are encoded with cross-attention in the encoder block before obtaining sentence embeddings. The model is trained by leveraging a novel form of textual supervision which leverages co-citation contexts to align the sentences of positive examples. Test time behavior ranks documents based on the smallest L2 distance of sentences between documents or the smallest L2 distance between a set of query sentences and a candidate document.
### Training data
The model is trained on pairs of co-cited papers with their sentences aligned by the co-citation context in a contrastive learning setup. The model is trained on 1.2 million biomedical paper pairs. In training the model, negative examples for the contrastive loss are obtained as random in-batch negatives. Co-citations are obtained from the full text of papers. For example - the papers in brackets below are all co-cited and each pair of papers would be used as a training pair with the abstracts sentence aligned using the co-citation context. Here the context notes why the cited papers are similar:
> The idea of distant supervision has been proposed and used widely in Relation Extraction (Mintz et al., 2009; Riedel et al., 2010; Hoffmann et al., 2011; Surdeanu et al., 2012) , where the source of labels is an external knowledge base.
### Training procedure
The model was trained with the Adam Optimizer and a learning rate of 2e-5 with 1000 warm-up steps followed by linear decay of the learning rate. The model training convergence is checked with the loss on a held out dev set consisting of co-cited paper pairs.
### Intended uses & limitations
This model is trained for fine-grained document similarity tasks in **biomedical** scientific text using multiple vectors per document. The model allows fine grained similarity by establishing sentence-to-sentence similarity between documents. The model is most well suited to an aspect conditional task formulation where a query might consist of sentence in a query document and candidates must be retrieved along this specified sentences. Here, the documents are the title and abstract of a paper. With appropriate fine-tuning the model can also be used for other tasks such as document or sentence level classification. Since the training data comes primarily from biomedicine, performance on other domains may be poorer.
### How to use
This model can be used via the `transformers` library and some additional code to compute contextual sentence vectors.
View example usage in the model github repo: https://github.com/allenai/aspire#tsaspire
### Variable and metrics
This model is evaluated on information retrieval datasets with document level queries. Here we report performance on RELISH (biomedical/English), and TRECCOVID (biomedical/English). These are detailed on [github](https://github.com/allenai/aspire) and in our [paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.08366). These datasets represent a abstract level retrieval task, where given a query scientific abstract the task requires the retrieval of relevant candidate abstracts. In using this sentence level model for abstract level retrieval we rank documents by the minimal L2 distance between the sentences in the query and candidate abstract.
### Evaluation results
The released model `aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-biomed` is compared against `allenai/specter`, a bi-encoder baseline and `all-mpnet-base-v2` a strong non-contextual sentence-bert baseline model trained on ~1 billion training examples. `aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-biomed`* is the performance reported in our paper by averaging over 3 re-runs of the model. The released model `aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-biomed` is the single best run among the 3 re-runs.
| | TRECCOVID | TRECCOVID | RELISH | RELISH |
|-------------------------------------------:|:---------:|:-------:|:------:|:-------:|
| | MAP | NDCG%20 | MAP | NDCG%20 |
| `all-mpnet-base-v2` | 17.35 | 43.87 | 52.92 | 69.69 |
| `specter` | 28.24 | 59.28 | 60.62 | 77.20 |
| `aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-biomed`* | 26.24 | 56.55 | 61.29 | 77.89 |
| `aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-biomed` | 26.68 | 57.21 | 61.06 | 77.70 |
**Alternative models:**
Besides the above models consider these alternative models also released in the Aspire paper:
[`aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-compsci`](https://huggingface.co/allenai/aspire-contextualsentence-singlem-compsci): If you wanted to run on computer science papers and want to use a model trained to match a _single_ sentence between documents.
[`aspire-contextualsentence-multim-biomed`](https://huggingface.co/allenai/aspire-contextualsentence-multim-biomed): If you wanted to run on biomedical papers and want to use a model trained to match _multiple_ sentences between documents.
[`aspire-contextualsentence-multim-compsci`](https://huggingface.co/allenai/aspire-contextualsentence-multim-compsci): If you wanted to run on computer science papers and want to use a model trained to match _multiple_ sentences between documents.