--- base_model: black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-dev --- *Note that all these models are derivatives of black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-dev and therefore covered by the [FLUX.1 [dev] Non-Commercial License](https://huggingface.co/black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-dev/blob/main/LICENSE.md) license.* *Some models are derivatives of finetunes, and are included with the permission of the finetuner* # Optimised Flux GGUF models A collection of GGUF models using mixed quantization (different layers quantized to different precision to optimise fidelity v. memory), created using [mixed gguf converter](https://github.com/chrisgoringe/mixed-gguf-converter). They can be loaded in ComfyUI using the [ComfyUI GGUF Nodes](https://github.com/city96/ComfyUI-GGUF). Just put the gguf files in your models/unet directory. ## Naming convention (mx for 'mixed') [original_model_name]_mxN_N.gguf where N_N is the average number of bits per parameter. ## Good choices to start with ``` - 3_1 is the smallest yet - might work on 6 GB? - 3_8 might work on a 8 GB card - 6_9 should be good for a 12 GB card - 8_2 is a good choice for 16 GB cards if you want to add LoRAs etc - 9_2 fits on a 16 GB card ``` ## Speed? On an A40 (plenty of VRAM), everything except the model identical, the time taken to generate an image (30 steps, deis sampler) was about 65% longer than for the full model (45s v 27s). Quantised models will generally be slower because the weights have to be converted back into a native torch form when they are needed. ## How are these 'optimised'? The optimization is based on a cost metric, representing the error introduced by quantizing a specified layer with a specified quant. The data can be found [here](https://github.com/chrisgoringe/mixed-gguf-converter/tree/main/costs), and details of the process are below. From this, any possible quantization can be given a cost and a benefit (bits saved). The possible quantizations are then sorted from best (benefit/cost) to worst, and applied in order, until the required number of bits have been removed. ### Calculating costs I created a database of the hidden states at the start and end of the transformer stack as follows: - 240 prompts used for flux images popular at civit.ai were run through the full Flux.1-dev model with randomised resolution and step count. - For a randomly selected step in the inference, the hidden states before and after the layer stack were captured. To calculate the cost of quantizing a specific layer to a specific quant: - A single layer in the transformer stack was quantized - The 240 initial hidden states were run through the stack - The cost is defined as the mean square difference between the outputs of the modified stack and the unmodified stack The cost, therefore, is a measure of how much change is introduced into the output hidden states by the quantization. ## Not quantized In all these models, the 'in' blocks, the final layer blocks, and all normalization scale parameters are not quantized. These represent of 0.54% of all parameters in the model. In patch models (where the states were quantised using llama.cpp code), the biases are also not quantized. These represent 0.03% of all parameters in the model.